[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7230-7234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3129]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. 301-92]
Determination of Action Concerning the People's Republic of
China's Protection of Intellectual Property and Provision of Market
Access to Persons Who Rely on Intellectual Property Protection
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of determination pursuant to sections 301 and 304 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (Trade Act), 19 U.S.C. 2414.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 304(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act, the
United States Trade Representative (USTR) has determined that certain
acts, policies and practices of the Chinese government with respect to
the enforcement of intellectual property rights and the provision of
market access to persons who rely on intellectual property protection
are unreasonable and constitute a burden or restriction on U.S.
commerce. Pursuant to section 304(a)(1)(B) and section 301(b), the USTR
has determined that trade action is appropriate and that sanctions are
appropriate. The sanctions will take the form of increasing duties on
products listed in the attached Annex originating in China to 100
percent ad valorem.
EFFECTIVE DATE: USTR's determination as to actionability and the
specific action to be taken was made on February 4, 1995. The increased
duties will be assessed upon all products of China identified in the
Annex to this notice that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, on or after February 26, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20606.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Lehr, Director for China and Mongolian Affairs (202) 395-5050,
Joseph Papovich, Deputy Assistant USTR for Intellectual Property (202)
395-6864, or Thomas Robertson, Assistant General Counsel (202) 395-
6800.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 30, 1994, China was identified as a
priority foreign country under the ``special 301'' provisions of the
Trade Act for its failure to enforce intellectual property rights or to
provide fair and equitable market access to persons who rely on
intellectual property protection. On the same day, the USTR initiated
an investigation of those acts, policies and practices of China that
were the basis for its identification as a priority foreign country.
See 59 FR 35558 (July 12, 1994).
The effectiveness of China's enforcement regime is hampered by,
among other things, internally inconsistent laws; a lack of
transparency in the enforcement structure; a lack of protection for
existing works; gaps in responsibility in the enforcement structure; a
lack of consistent application of the laws throughout the central,
provincial and local governments; a lack of funding, training and
education; possible conflicts of interest; burdensome and
discriminatory agency requirements that restrict foreign access to
trademark protection; overly-broad compulsory licensing provisions; a
failure of enforcement authorities to coordinate; and the absence of an
effective border control mechanism.
In the area of market access, the most serious problems with the
Chinese system are found in the areas of audio-visual products, sound
recordings, and published written materials. Particular concerns
include a hidden system of internal quotas, a lack of transparency, a
lack of consistency in application, monopoly control over the
importation and distribution of products embodying intellectual
property, and a prohibition on the production or distribution of
products embodying intellectual property that is not related to the
content of those products.
Extension of Investigation, Proposed Determinations, and Public
Comment
On January 5, 1995, the USTR published a notice that the six-month
statutory deadline for the close of this investigation had been
extended until February 4, 1995, in light of the complex and
complicated nature of the issues involved. See 60 FR 1829, 1830
(January 5, 1995). In that notice, the USTR also published a proposed
determination of action and request for public comment concerning the
proposed action. The USTR proposed to determine that China's failure to
enforce intellectual property laws or to provide market access to
persons who rely on intellectual property protection is unreasonable
and discriminatory and constitutes a burden or restriction on U.S.
commerce. If that determination were finally made, the USTR also
proposed to increase duties on certain products of China in an amount
equivalent to the damaged caused by the Chinese acts, policies and
practices which formed the basis of the investigation. The USTR
published, as an annex to the notice, a list of products from which
specific products could be selected for the imposition of increased
duties.
In response to the January 5, 1995, Federal Register notice, the
USTR and the section 301 Committee receive approximately 198 sets of
written comments and heard the oral testimony of 53 witnesses at public
hearings held on January 24-25, 1995. The comments primarily focused on
the appropriateness of subjecting the products listed in the proposed
retaliation list to an increase in duties, the levels at which duties
on particular products should be set, and the degree to which an
increase in duties on particular products might have an adverse effect
on U.S. consumers, workers and industries. [[Page 7231]]
The United States estimates that the damage caused by China's
failure to provide adequate intellectual property protection or market
access for persons who rely on intellectual property protection is at
least $1.08 billion on an annual basis. The USTR has directed the
section 301 Committee to examine the effect on U.S. commerce of the
export of infringing products from China to third countries.
Determination and Action
Numerous meetings have been held with the Chinese Government on
these issues since the initiation of this investigation. While China
has indicated it will take some action to address U.S. concerns, issues
remain unresolved. Consequently, pursuant to section 304(a)(1) of the
Trade Act, the USTR has determined (1) that China's acts, policies and
practices which formed the basis of the investigation are unreasonable
and discriminatory and constitute a burden or restriction on U.S.
commerce, and (2) that trade action is appropriate. Pursuant to section
301(b) and 301(c), the USTR has decided to increase duties to 100
percent ad valorem upon goods described in the Annex to this notice
that are of Chinese origin. These products were selected in light of
the comments submitted to the section 301 Committee in response to the
January 5, 1995, notice and the testimony presented at the public
hearing held on January 24-25, 1995.
Accordingly, effective with respect to articles entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after February 26,
1995, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) is
hereby modified by inserting the provisions listed in the Annex to this
notice in numerical sequence in subchapter III of chapter 99, with the
content of the new subheadings and superior text set forth in the HTS
columns designated ``Heading/Subheading'', ``Article Description'', and
``Rate of Duty General'', respectively. The amount of trade affected by
this action is equivalent to the value of the burden or restriction on
U.S. commerce by the Chinese practices that formed the basis of the
investigation.
Irving A. Williamson,
Chairman, Section 301 Committee.
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
[[Page 7232]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07FE95.003
[[Page 7233]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07FE95.004
[[Page 7234]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07FE95.005
[FR Doc. 95-3129 Filed 2-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-C