[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32083]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: December 29, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Decommissioning of Babcock & Wilcox's Shallow Land Disposal Area
in Parks Township, PA; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement and to Conduct a Scoping Process
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS), to conduct a scoping process for the EIS, and to conduct a
scoping meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
for the decommissioning of Babcock & Wilcox's (B&W) Shallow Land
Disposal Area (SLDA) located in Parks Township, Pennsylvania. The SLDA
is an area which was used in the 1960's and 1970's to dispose of
radioactively contaminated materials in accordance with the previous
requirement at 10 CFR 20.304. NRC rescinded this requirement in 1981.
This notice indicates NRC's intent to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement in conjunction with this proposed action and to conduct a
scoping process that will include a public scoping meeting.
DATES: Written comments on matters covered by this notice received by
February 27, 1995, will be considered in developing the scope of the
EIS. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration only
for comments received on or before this date. A public scoping meeting
will be held at the Leechburg Area High School in Leechburg,
Pennsylvania, on January 26, 1995 from 7-10 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the matters covered by this notice or
the scoping meeting should be sent to: Rules Review and Directives
Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Hand
deliver comments to 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852,
between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., on Federal workdays.
The scoping meeting will be held in the cafeteria of the Leechburg
Area High School, 215 First Street, Leechburg, PA, on January 26, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Astwood, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
Washington, DC 20555, Telephone: 301-415-5819.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has the statutory
responsibility for protection of public health and safety and the
environment related to the use of source, byproduct, and special
nuclear material under the Atomic Energy Act. The NRC believes that one
portion of this responsibility is to assure safe and timely
decommissioning of nuclear facilities which it licenses. This
responsibility can be partially fulfilled by providing guidance to
licensees on how to plan for and prepare their sites for
decommissioning.
Decommissioning, as defined in the NRC's regulations in 10 CFR
40.4, for example, means to remove nuclear facilities safely from
service and to reduce residual radioactivity to a level that permits
release of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the
license.
Once licensed activities have ceased, licensees are required, in
existing NRC regulations, to decommission their facilities so that
their licenses can be terminated. This requires that radioactivity in
buildings, equipment, soil, groundwater, and surface water resulting
from the licensed operation be reduced to acceptably low levels that
allow the property to be released for unrestricted use. Licensees must
then demonstrate by a site radiological survey that residual
contamination in all facilities and environmental media have been
properly reduced or eliminated and that, except for any residual
radiological contamination found to be acceptable to remain at the
site, radioactive material has been transferred to authorized
recipients. Confirmatory surveys are conducted by NRC, where
appropriate, to verify that sites meet NRC radiological criteria for
decommissioning.
Need For Proposed Action
The SLDA is an area which was used in the 1960's and 1970's to
dispose of radioactively contaminated materials in accordance with the
regulations found in the now rescinded 10 CFR 20.304. The former owners
of the Parks Township site (NUMEC) disposed of radioactive (primarily
uranium and thorium) and non-radioactive waste in the SLDA during the
1960's and early 1970's. In 1967, the Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO)
purchased stock in NUMEC. ARCO sold the stock to B&W in 1971. Since the
acquisition of the stock, B&W has maintained the SLDA under an active
NRC license (License No. SNM-414; Docket No. 070-00364). The SLDA is
currently listed in NRC's Site Decommissioning Management Plan (SDMP)
because it warrants special NRC oversight to ensure safe and timely
decommissioning.
Based on available records, the waste placed in the trenches by
NUMEC, consisted of process wastes, scrap, and trash from the nearby
Apollo nuclear fuel fabrication facility. This waste contained
radioactive materials, including natural uranium and uranium that was
either enriched or depleted with respect to uranium-235. The waste also
contained lesser quantities of thorium. At least some of the waste is
known to exceed NRC's existing radiological criteria for
decommissioning. Therefore, NRC is requiring the licensee to remediate
the SLDA to meet the NRC's decommissioning criteria, as described in
NRC's Action Plan to Ensure Timely Cleanup of SDMP Sites (April 16,
1992; 57 FR 13389).
B&W and ARCO have performed characterization activities for the
SLDA and submitted a Site Characterization Report (SCR) for the SLDA,
dated October 1993. The NRC reviewed and commented on the SCR by letter
dated March 24, 1994 and received a response to those comments from B&W
by letter dated September 28, 1994. Also, on September 28, 1994, B&W
submitted to the NRC a proposal for the remediation of the SLDA. B&W
and ARCO have proposed that the waste trenches be stabilized in place.
The proposal is based on a comprehensive analysis of three
alternatives: stabilization in place, exhumation of the waste and
stabilization on site, and exhumation of the waste and disposal off
site. NRC and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
are currently reviewing this proposal.
The NRC has determined that approval of the licensee's proposal
would constitute a major federal action and, therefore, warrants
preparation of an EIS in accordance with the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and the NRC's implementing requirements in 10 CFR
Part 51. Approval of the other alternatives may also constitute major
Federal actions. The alternatives may involve significant radiological
and non-radiological risks to humans and the environment resulting from
the remedial actions. In addition, stabilization on site or in place
could also constitute an irretrievable commitment of land resources
dedicated for waste disposal purposes. Concentrations of uranium and
thorium in the waste are known or expected to exceed NRC's current
criteria for allowing release of sites for unrestricted use. These
criteria are listed in NRC's SDMP Action Plan (57 FR 13389; April 16,
1992). As described in the 1992 Action Plan, the criteria are applied
on a site-specific basis with emphasis on attaining residual
contamination levels that are as low as is reasonably achievable
(ALARA).
Consequently, if NRC approved either stabilization in place or
onsite disposal, land use restrictions or other institutional controls
may be necessary to ensure long-term protection of the public and the
environment. NRC expects that B&W would have to apply for and obtain an
exemption from NRC's present requirements because NRC's current
requirements for decommissioning do not allow for land use restrictions
(see definition of decommissioning in 10 CFR 40.4).
In addition to the issues discussed above that fall under NRC's
jurisdiction, there are other environmental issues associated with
decommissioning the SLDA that are regulated by other agencies,
including the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
(PADER). For example, the waste trenches may contain hazardous or solid
waste regulated by PADER in addition to the radioactive waste that is
regulated by NRC. The scoping process and EIS will not only aid NRC in
reaching decisions about the decommissioning of the SLDA, but should
also be useful to PADER in discharging its duties.
Description of Proposed Action
The proposed action is stabilization onsite of radioactive waste
contained in the trenches at the SLDA using an engineered cover system
and a system of hydrologic barriers surrounding the trench areas to
provide groundwater protection.
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement
Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all Federal
agencies must consider the effect of their actions on the environment.
Section 102(1) of NEPA requires that the policies, regulations, and
public laws of the United States be interpreted and administered in
accordance with the policies set forth in NEPA. It is the intent of
NEPA to have Federal agencies incorporate consideration of
environmental issues into their decision-making processes. NRC
regulations implementing NEPA are contained in 10 CFR Part 51. To
fulfill NRC's responsibilities under NEPA, the NRC intends to prepare
an EIS that will analyze the environmental impacts of the proposed
action, as well as environmental impacts of alternatives to the
proposed action and the costs associated with both the proposed action
and the alternatives. All reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action will be analyzed. The scope of the EIS includes consideration of
both radiological and non-radiological impacts associated with the
alternative actions.
This notice announces the NRC's intent to prepare an EIS. The
principal intent of the EIS is to provide a document describing
environmental consequences that will be available to the Agency's
decision makers in reviewing the licensee's remediation proposal and
future decommissioning plan for the SLDA.
The Scoping Process
The Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 51 contain requirements for
conducting a scoping process prior to preparation of an EIS. In
accordance with 10 CFR 51.26, whenever the NRC determines that an EIS
will be prepared by NRC in connection with a proposed action, NRC will
publish a notice of intent in the Federal Register stating that an EIS
will be prepared and conduct an appropriate scoping process. In
addition, this scoping process may include the holding of a public
scoping meeting.
NRC also describes, in 10 CFR 51.27, the content of the notice of
intent and requires that the notice describe the proposed action and
also, to the extent that sufficient information is available, possible
alternatives. In addition, the notice of intent is to describe the
proposed scoping process, including the role of participants, whether
written comments will be accepted, and whether a public scoping meeting
will be held.
In accordance with Secs. 51.26 and 51.27, the proposed action and
possible alternative approaches are discussed below. The role of
participants in the scoping process for this EIS includes the
following:
(1) Participants may attend and provide oral discussion on the
proposed action and possible alternatives at the public scoping meeting
at the Leechburg, Area High School cafeteria, Leechburg, PA, on January
26, 1995, from 7 to 10 p.m.
(2) The Commission will also accept written comments on the
proposed action and alternatives from the public. Written comments
should be submitted by February 27, 1995, and should be sent to: Rules
Review and Directives Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555. Hand deliver comments to 11545 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland between 7:45 am and 4:15 pm on Federal workdays.
According to 10 CFR 51.29, the scoping process is to be used to
address the topics which follow. Participants may make written
comments, or verbal comments at the scoping meeting, on the following
(current preliminary NRC staff approaches with regard to each topic are
included for information):
(a) Define the proposed action to be the subject of the EIS. The
proposed action and alternatives are stabilization in place,
stabilization onsite, and disposal offsite of the waste in the trenches
at the SLDA in Parks Township, Pennsylvania. NRC will also consider the
designated ``No Action'' alternative for comparison with the other
alternatives.
(b) Determine the scope of the EIS and the significant issues to be
analyzed in depth. The NRC is proposing to analyze the costs and
impacts associated with the proposed action and alternative
decommissioning approaches. The following proposed outline for the EIS
reflects the current NRC staff view on the scope and major topics to be
dealt within the EIS:
Proposed Outline: Environmental Impact Statement
Abstract
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action
1.3 Description of Proposed Action
1.4 Approach in Preparation of the Draft EIS
1.5 Structure of the Draft EIS
2. Alternatives including the Proposed Action
2.1 Factors Considered in Evaluating Alternatives
2.2 Alternatives
2.3 Regulatory Compliance
3. Affected Environment
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Description of the B&W SLDA
3.3 Land Use
3.4 Geology/Seismicity
3.5 Meteorology and Hydrology
3.6 Ecology
3.7 Socioeconomic Characteristics
3.8 Radiation
3.9 Cultural Resources
3.10 Other Environmental Features,
4. Decommissioning Alternatives Analyzed and Method of Approach for
the Analysis
4.1 General Information on Approach and Method of Analysis of
Decommissioning Alternatives
4.2 Alternatives Considered--each of the alternatives represent
alternate decomissioning approaches.
(a) Alternative 1, Stabilization in Place [Licensee's Proposed
Action]--radioactive waste in the trenches would be stabilized in
place. This alternative includes an engineered cover, a slurry wall,
a grout curtain and hydraulic control borings all designed to
isolate the waste in a manner to provide long-term protection of the
waste and to minimize groundwater contamination. This alternative
would also likely include land use restrictions and/or other
institutional controls to prevent or reduce potential intrusion into
the waste and to monitor the long-term effectiveness of the disposal
and take mitigative measures as necessary to protect the public and
environment. The alternative may also include a long-term license to
ensure that necessary surveillance and monitoring activities are
conducted.
(b) Alternative 2, Disposal On Site--trench wastes would be
exhumed from the trenches, sorted, treated, and packaged in
appropriate containers. The containers would then be placed in an
engineered vault for disposal on site. This alternative would also
likely include land use restrictions and long term monitoring of the
site. The alternative may also include a long-term license to ensure
that necessary surveillance and monitoring activities are conducted.
(c) Alternative 3, Disposal Off Site--trench wastes would be
exhumed from the trenches, sorted, treated, and packaged onsite and
then shipped offsite and disposed of at various disposal facilities,
depending on the type of waste. The disposal facility may either be
located in the vicinity of Parks Township SLDA, for material that
can be disposed of in a municipal landfill, or in another area in
permitted hazardous waste or licensed low-level waste disposal
facilities. Radioactive contamination onsite would be reduced down
to levels that NRC presently considers acceptable for release for
unrestricted use (e.g., 30 picoCuries per gram (pCi/g) enriched
uranium and other criteria such as exposure rate and radon
concentrations):
(d) Alternative 4, No Action--trench contents would be left in
their present condition without any additional processing or
stabilization. This alternative does not consider any protective
measures, such as land use restrictions or other institutional
controls, that might mitigate or prevent intrusion into the waste or
long-term release and transport of contamination in the environment.
4.3 Method of Analysis of Alternatives
(a) Define a range of alternatives;
(b) Evaluate the alternatives with respect to: (1) The
incremental impact to workers, members of the public, and the
environment, both radiological and nonradiological, resulting from
each alternative, and (2) the costs associated with each regulatory
alternative. Evaluations of impacts and costs are contained in
Sections 5 and 6 below;
(c) Perform a comparative evaluation of the alternatives based
on the impacts and costs of each alternative from 4.3(b).
5. Environmental Consequences, Monitoring, and Mitigation
5.1 Construction and Remediation Consequences
5.2 Monitoring Programs
5.3 Mitigation Measures
5.4 Unaviodable Adverse Environmental Impacts
5.5 Relationship between Short-Term Uses of the Environment and
Long-Term Productivity
5.6 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources
6. Costs and Benefits Associated with Decommissioning Alternatives
6.1 General
6.2 Quantifiable Socioeconomic Impacts
6.3 The Benefit-Cost Summary
6.4 Staff Assessment
7. List of Preparers
8. List of Agencies, Organizations, and Persons Receiving Copies of
the Draft EIS
9. References
Appendix A--Reserved for Comments on DEIS
Appendix B--Results of Scoping Process
(c) Identify and eliminate from detailed study issues which are not
significant or which are peripheral or which have been covered by prior
environmental review. The NRC has not yet eliminated any nonsignificant
issues. However, NRC is considering elimination of the following issues
from the scope of this EIS because they have been previously analyzed
in a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) (NUREG-0586) and
included in an earlier rulemaking (53 FR 24018; June 28, 1988): (i)
planning necessary to conduct decommissioning operations in a safe
manner; (ii) assurance that sufficient funds are available to pay for
decommissioning; (iii) the time period in which decommissioning should
be completed; and (iv) whether facilities should not be left abandoned,
but instead remediated to appropriate levels. In addition, requirements
were recently established in a separate rulemaking regarding timeliness
of decommissioning for licensed facilities regulated under 10 CFR Parts
30, 40, and 70 (59 FR 36026; July 15, 1994). NRC also recently proposed
establishing radiological criteria for decommissioning, which are
supported by a draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (NUREG-
1496; 59 FR 43200; August 22, 1994).
(d) Identify any Environmental Assessments or EISs which are being
or will be prepared that are related but are not part of the scope of
this EIS. An Environmental Assessment on the timeliness of
decommissioning has been prepared as part of a separate rulemaking on
decommissioning timeliness (59 FR 36026; July 15, 1994). NRC is
presently developing a Generic EIS (NUREG-1496) to support the
rulemaking to establish generic radiological criteria for
decommissioning (59 FR 43200; August 22, 1994). In addition, NRC is
presently developing EISs for decommissioning sites owned by the
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation in Cambridge, OH, and Newfield,
NJ.
(e) Identify other environmental review or consultation
requirements related to the proposed action. NRC will consult with
other Federal, State, and local agencies that have jurisdiction over
the decommissioning of the Parks Township SLDA. For example, NRC has
already been coordinating its reviews of decommissioning actions at the
SLDA with PADER. NRC anticipates continued consultation with this and
other agencies, as appropriate, during the development of the EIS.
(f) Indicate the relationship between the timing of the preparation
of environmental analysis and the Commission's tentative planning and
decision making schedule. NRC intends to prepare and issue for public
comment a draft EIS in late 1995. The comment period would be for 90
days. The final EIS is scheduled for publication in the Fall of 1996.
This schedule may be impacted by the availability and adequacy of
information about the site. Subsequent to completion of the final EIS,
the NRC would review and act on a license amendment from the licensee
requesting authorization for decommissioning the site, including review
of the decommissioning plan as required in 10 CFR 40.42(c)(2).
(g) Describe the means by which the EIS will be prepared. NRC will
prepare the draft EIS according to the requirements in 10 CFR Part 51.
Specifically, in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51.71, the draft EIS will
consider comments submitted to NRC as part of the scoping process and
will include a preliminary analysis which considers and balances the
environmental and other effects of the proposed action and the
alternatives available for reducing or avoiding adverse environmental
and other effects, as well as the environmental, economic, technical,
and other benefits of the proposed action.
The EIS will be prepared by the NRC staff and an NRC contractor.
NRC is arranging a project with Oak Ridge National Laboratory to
provide technical assistance in the preparation of the EIS. In
addition, NRC anticipates requesting specific information from the
licensee to support preparation of the EIS. Any information received
from the licensee related to the EIS will be available for public
review, unless the information is protected from public disclosure in
accordance with NRC requirements in 10 CFR 2.790.
In the scoping process, participants are invited to speak or submit
written comments, as noted above, on any or all of the areas described
above. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.29, at the conclusion of the
scoping process, NRC will prepare a concise summary of the
determinations and conclusions reached, including the significant
issues identified, and will send a copy to each participant in the
scoping process.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of December 1994.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John E. Glenn,
Chief, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, Division of
Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 94-32083 Filed 12-28-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M