[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 6, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-29898]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: December 6, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the
Requirements of 49 CFR Part 236
Pursuant to 49 CFR Part 235 and 49 U.S.C. App. 26, the following
railroads have petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
seeking approval for the discontinuance or modification of the signal
system or relief from the requirements of 49 CFR Part 236 as detailed
below.
Block Signal Application (BS-AP)-No. 3334
Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Mr. P.M. Abaray, Chief
Engineer-Signals/Quality, 1416 Dodge Street, room 1000, Omaha, Nebraska
68179
The Union Pacific Railroad Company seeks approval of the proposed
discontinuance and removal of the signal system, on the single track
Cedar Bayou Drawbridge, milepost 34.9, near Baytown, Texas, San Antonio
Subdivision, Baytown Branch; consisting of the removal of signals 1, 2,
3, and 4.
The reason given for the proposed changes is that present traffic
does not warrant the signal system.
BS-AP-No. 3335
Applicant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Mr. J.W. Smith, Chief
Engineer--C&S, Communication and Signal Department, 185 Spring Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303
The Norfolk Southern Corporation seeks approval of the proposed
modification of the signal system, on the two main tracks, at the East
End Bluefield Yard and Allen Street Bridge, in Bluefield, West
Virginia, on the Pocahontas District, Pocahontas Division; consisting
of the discontinuance and removal of signals 3633D and 3634B, the
relocation of signal 3627, and the modification of signals 3636A,
3636B, 3633A, and 3635A to display restricting.
The reason given for the proposed changes is to improve operations
and increase efficiency.
BS-AP-No. 3336
Applicants: Springfield Terminal Railway Company and Boston and Maine
Corporation, Mr. S.F. Nevero, Vice President Engineering, Iron Horse
Park, North Billerica, Massachusetts 01862
The Springfield Terminal Railway Company and Boston and Maine
Corporation (BM), jointly seek approval of the proposed discontinuance
and removal of the traffic control system, on the single main track,
between East Northfield, Massachusetts, CP TD, milepost 49.67 and
Greenfield, Massachusetts, CP CPR-38, milepost 37.72, on the BM
Connecticut River Main Line, and operate by NORAC 400 Rules, Voice
Control System.
The reason given for the proposed changes is that the formerly
operated passenger service and through freight trains presently operate
via alternate routes.
BS-AP-No. 3337
Applicants: Southern Pacific Lines, Mr. J.A. Turner, Engineer--Signals,
Southern Pacific Building, One Market Plaza, San Francisco, California
94105
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Mr. W.S. Seery, Director
Signal Systems, Communications and Signal, 4501 Kansas Avenue, Kansas
City, Kansas 66106-1195
Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Mr. William G. Peterson, Director
Signal Engineering, 9401 Indian Creek Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas
66210-2007
Southern Pacific Lines, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Company, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company jointly seek approval
of the proposed conversion of the manual interlocking system to a
traffic control system, at South Denver, milepost WC-3.6, near Denver,
Colorado, Rocky Mountain Region, Subdivision 1.
The reason given for the proposed changes is to enhance safety by
having the dispatcher use only one set of operating rules for the
territory under his control.
Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the
protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the
protestant in the proceeding. The original and two copies of the
protest shall be filed with the Associate Administrator for Safety,
FRA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590 within 45 calendar
days of the date of issuance of this notice. Additionally, one copy of
the protest shall be furnished to the applicant at the address listed
above.
FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC on November 30, 1994.
Phil Olekszyk,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program
Implementation.
[FR Doc. 94-29898 Filed 12-5-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P