[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-29093]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: November 25, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-4717-7]

 

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared November 7, 1994 through 
November 11, 1994 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), 
under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(C) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of 
EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 
(202) 260-5076.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 8, 1994 (59 FR 
16807).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D-USA-G11027-NM Rating EC2
    White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), Implementation, Range-wide, Las 
Cruces, NM.

Summary

    EPA expressed environmental concern regarding cumulative impacts 
and requested that the final EIS discuss this issue in greater detail.

Final EISs

ERP No. F-CDB-C80013-NY
    Southwest Middle School Project, Construction and Operation, Site 
Approval and CDBG Funds, City of Rochester, Monroe County, NY.

Summary

    EPA believed that the implementation of this project will not 
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Accordingly, 
EPA had no objection to its implementation.

ERP No. F-COE-G32053-LA
    Port Fourchon Navigation Channel Project, Channel Deepening, 
Implementation, Lafourche Parish, LA.

Summary

    EPA had no objection to the project as proposed. The Final EIS 
adequately addressed EPA's comments on the Draft EIS.

ERP No. F-DOI-L39051-AK
    Institute of Marine Science Infrastructure Improvement, Long-Term 
Research and Monitoring of the Ecosystem affected by the Exxon Valdez 
Oil Spill, Funding, Seward, AK.

Summary

    EPA had no objection to the preferred alternative as described in 
the EIS.

ERP No. F-EPA-E90014-FL
    Tampa Bay Area Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) 
Designation for Material Not Suitable for Beach Nourishment and Other 
Suitable Disposal Options, Offshore Tampa, FL.

Summary

ERP No. F-FHW-K40183-CA
    Eastern Transportation Corridor (ETC) Construction, CA-231 between 
the Riverside/CA-91 and Santa Ana/I-5 Freeways, Funding and COE Section 
404 Permit, Orange County, CA.

Summary

    EPA expressed environmental concerns for the minimal consideration 
of emission impacts of travelling at speeds greater than 55mph, and for 
the lack of response to the mitigation acreage recommendations of the 
California Fish and Game Department.

ERP No. FS-COE-A36364-LA
    Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project, Fish 
and Wildlife Mitigation Plan, St. John the Baptist, St. Charles, 
Orleans and St. Bernard Parishes, LA.

Summary

    Review of the final EIS was not deemed necessary. No comment letter 
was sent to preparing Agency.

ERP No. FS-NPS-K61085-00
    Lake Mead National Recreation Area, General Management Plan, 
Updated Information on Willow Beach Development Concept Plan Amendment, 
AZ and NV.

Summary

    Review of the final EIS was not deemed necessary. No comment letter 
was sent to the preparing Agency.

    Dated: November 21, 1994.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, Federal Agency Liaison Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 94-29093 Filed 11-23-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P