[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-28972]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: November 25, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5111-7]

 

Approval of Revisions to the State of Michigan's Federally 
Approved Wetland Program Resulting From the Reorganization of the 
Michigan Department of Natural Resources

AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Notice of approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the United States Environmental 
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) approves the revisions to the State of 
Michigan's federally approved wetland program resulting from the 
reorganization of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) 
by Executive Order 1991-31.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 25, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Douglas Ehorn, Chief, Wetlands and Watersheds 
Section, U.S. EPA, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson (WQW-16J), Chicago, 
Illinois, 60604. (312) 353-2308

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On October 2, 1984, EPA published notice of its approval of the 
State of Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program pursuant to Section 
404(g)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344(g)(1). 49 FR 38948. 
Michigan's program became effective October 16, 1984. 49 FR 38948 
(October 2, 1984). 40 CFR 233.60.
    40 CFR 233.16 requires that EPA review and either approve or 
disapprove of any revisions to a state's Section 404 wetlands program 
based upon whether the revisions comply with the requirements of the 
Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations. 40 CFR 233.16(d)(3) 
provides that, if EPA determines that a program revision is 
substantial, EPA must provide public notice and an opportunity for 
public hearing on the revision.
    Michigan's original program description submitted to EPA on October 
26, 1983 specified that the Michigan Department of Natural Resources 
(MDNR) was the agency responsible for implementing the permitting and 
enforcement components of Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program. The 
Michigan Water Resources Commission (MWRC) was specified as the agency 
responsible for insuring that wetland permitting was coordinated with 
state, interstate and federal-state water related planning and review 
processes.
    On November 8, 1991, the Governor of Michigan issued Executive 
Order 1991-31. Executive Order 1991-31, which became effective on 
September 2, 1993, provides that:

    All the statutory authority, power, duties, functions and 
responsibilities of the Commission of Natural Resources and the 
Department of Natural Resources * * * and of the director of the 
Department of Natural Resources and of the agencies, boards and 
commissions contained therein * * * are hereby transferred to the 
director of a new Michigan Department of Natural Resources, by a 
Type II transfer, as defined by Section 3 of Act No. 380 of the 
Public Acts of 1965, being Section 16.103 of the Michigan Compiled 
Laws.

    Executive Order 1991-31 also provided that the responsibilties and 
authorities of the MWRC were transferred, via a Type III transfer, from 
the Water Resources Commission to the director of a new MDNR.
    Pursuant to EPA's request, Michigan submitted numerous documents to 
EPA that were necessary for EPA to determine whether the revisions to 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program resulting from Executive Order 
1991-93 would comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and 
its implementing regulations and whether such revisions were 
substantial. According to Michigan, there had been no substantive 
changes in Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program as a result of 
Executive Order 1991-31. Instead, according to Michigan, Executive 
Order 1991-31 merely resulted in some reorganization within MDNR. 
Michigan certified in an Attorney General's Statement that all of the 
state authorities included in Michigan's original October 26, 1983 
program description remained in full force and effect after issuance of 
Executive Order 1991-31.
    Based upon its review of the documents submitted by Michigan, EPA 
made a preliminary determination that there had been no substantial 
revisions in Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program as a result of 
Executive Order 1991-31. However, because there appeared to be a 
significant amount of public interest in this matter, EPA chose to seek 
public comment on its determination. Consequently, on April 21, 1994, 
EPA published a notice in the Federal Register of EPA's preliminary 
determination and stated that ``EPA is seeking public comment 
concerning whether any substantial revisions to the State wetlands 
program were effected by the MDNR reorganization, and comment on Agency 
approval or disapproval of any revisions to Michigan's wetlands program 
as outlined in Executive Order 1991-93 and MDNR's December 15, 1993 
submittal.'' The notice further emphasized that ``EPA is not seeking at 
this time, public comment on unrelated issues regarding Michigan's 
wetland program.'' Finally, the notice stated that copies of Michigan's 
description of the wetlands program, related correspondence and EPA's 
findings of no substantial revisions would be available for public 
inspection at two locations in Michigan.

II. Comments

    In response to the April 21, 1994 notice, EPA received comments 
from nine commenters who disagreed with EPA's preliminary determination 
that Executive Order 1991-31 did not substantially revise Michigan's 
wetlands program. In addition, the United States Department of 
Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, stated that it agreed with EPA's 
preliminary determination that Executive Order 1991-31 did not 
substantially revise Michigan's wetland program and offered two 
additional comments. EPA's detailed responses to all comments received 
are set forth in a document entitled ``Response to Comments Raised 
Regarding Revisions to Michigan Wetland Program.'' This document can be 
obtained from Mr. Douglas Ehorn at the address and phone number listed 
above. A summary of the comments and EPA's responses to the comments is 
provided below.
    There were several comments that Executive Order 1991-31 has 
revised the public participation requirements in Michigan's Section 404 
wetlands program. Under 40 CFR 233.16(d)(3), changes in public 
participation requirements must be considered to be substantial 
changes. These commenters, therefore, believe that Executive Order 
1991-31 has effected a substantial revision in Michigan's wetland 
program.
    The public participation requirements for state Section 404 wetland 
programs are set forth at 40 CFR 233.32-34. These provisions contain 
specific requirements regarding the need for, timing of, information 
contained in, method of providing, and persons to be provided public 
notice of permit applications, draft general permits and consideration 
of major permit modifications (40 CFR 233.32); the need for and method 
of conducting public hearings (40 CFR 233.33); and the manner in which 
public comments must be considered and included in the official record 
in making permit determinations (40 CFR 233.34). Michigan, in its 
October 26, 1983 program description, demonstrated that the MDNR had 
authority to comply with all of the above requirements.
    As described above, MDNR is still the authority responsible for 
processing and making determinations regarding wetland permit 
applications in Michigan. None of the public participation requirements 
that were applicable to MDNR in processing and making determinations 
regarding wetland permit applications have changed as a result of 
Executive Order 1991-31. Therefore, EPA did not receive any comments 
that suggested that the public participation requirements applicable to 
MDNR in the processing and issuance of wetland permits had been changed 
or were in any way not in compliance with the requirements of the Clean 
Water Act and the public participation requirements of 40 CFR 233.32-
34. Instead, the comments on public participation focussed on three 
other issues.
    First, one commenter stated that public participation in the 
development of administrative rules implementing Michigan's wetlands 
program has changed in that the Director of the MDNR now establishes 
the administrative rules by which the program is administered rather 
than the Michigan Natural Resources Commission (``MNRC''). This 
commenter stated that the Director of MDNR, unlike MNRC, is not subject 
to Michigan's Open Meetings Act and therefore the Director can make 
final decisions on administrative rules pertaining to the wetlands 
program in closed meetings and the substance of those meetings need not 
be recorded. The commenter suggested that this represents a significant 
change from the way in which MNRC developed administrative rules for 
Michigan's wetlands program.
    EPA does not agree that this apparent change in the manner in which 
administrative rules are developed represents a change in Michigan's 
Section 404 wetlands program. A state's federally authorized Section 
404 wetlands program consists of the statutes and rules which govern 
the state's program. EPA has no role to play in overseeing or dictating 
how those statutes and rules are developed. Instead, EPA's role is to 
determine whether the statutes and rules which comprise the program 
comply with minimum federal requirements for authorized programs, 
regardless of how the state has developed those statutes and rules. If 
the state desires to change those statutes or rules, EPA has no role in 
determining the manner in which those statutes or rules are changed, so 
long as the state submits the proposed changes to EPA for review. 
Consequently, the applicability or inapplicability of the State's Open 
Meetings Act to changes in administrative rules does not represent a 
change in Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program.
    The second reason suggested by commenters that Executive Order 
1991-31 effected a change in public participation requirements pertains 
to changes involving the manner in which Michigan ``assure[s] that any 
state * * * whose waters may be affected by the issuance of a permit 
may submit written recommendation to the permitting state'' and 
``assures continued coordination with Federal and Federal-State water 
related planning and review processes'' as required by Sections 
404(h)(1)(E) & (H) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.Sec. 1344(h)(1)(E) 
& (H). In Michigan's original program description submitted to EPA on 
October 26, 1983, Michigan stated that it could assure such 
coordination because ``[t]he broad powers that were statutorily 
allotted to Michigan's Water Resource Commission [``MWRC''] are more 
than sufficient'' to provide such assurances.
    Commenters noted that Executive Order 1991-31 abolished MWRC and 
transferred its responsibilities and authorities to the Director of 
MDNR. These commenters claimed that MWRC was subject to the Open 
Meetings Act while the Director of MDNR is not. Consequently, these 
commenters suggest, there has been a change in the opportunities for 
public participation in the ``Federal and Federal-State water related 
planning and review processes.'' These commenters go on to suggest 
that, because Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program must assure 
coordination with these planning processes, a change in the public's 
opportunity to participate in those planning and review processes 
constitutes a change in the wetlands program's public participation 
provisions. EPA does not agree that changes in Federal and Federal-
State planning and review processes in the State of Michigan are 
changes in Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program.
    Section 404(h)(1)(E), 33 U.S.C. 1344(h)(1)(E), requires that state 
wetland programs ``assure that any State * * * whose waters may be 
affected by the issuance of a permit may submit written recommendations 
to the permitting State.'' Similarly, Section 404(h)(1)(H), 33 U.S.C. 
1344(h)(1)(H), requires that state wetland programs ``assure continued 
coordination with Federal and Federal-State water-related planning and 
review processes.'' Nothing in either section or anywhere else in 
Section 404 or the regulations implementing Section 404 requires that a 
state, as part of its Section 404 wetlands program, assure that the 
public is allowed to participate in any Federal, Federal-State or 
interstate coordinating processes. EPA's review of Michigan's Section 
404 wetlands program, therefore, is limited to a review of whether 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program contains provisions which 
assure the interstate, intrastate and Federal-State coordination 
required by Sections 404(h)(1)(E) and (H). As described below, EPA has 
determined that Michigan's Section 404 wetland program does contain 
such assurances.
    Section 323.1 et seq. of Michigan's Compiled Laws (Mich. Comp. 
Laws) established MWRC. Mich. Comp. Laws Sec. 323.2a(1) provides that 
``[t]he water resources commission is designated the state agency to 
cooperate and negotiate with other governments, governmental units and 
agencies thereof, in matters concerning the water resources of the 
state, including but not limited to flood control, beach erosion 
control and water quality control planning, development and 
management.'' Michigan, in its October 26, 1983 program description, 
relied upon Mich. Comp. Laws Sec. 323.2a(1) as the basis for assuring 
EPA that the interstate, intrastate and Federal-State coordination 
required by Sections 404(h)(1)(E) and (H) would occur. Section III.B.1 
of Executive Order 1991-31 transferred all of these duties and 
authorities from the MWRC to the Director of MDNR and the Michigan 
Attorney General has certified that these authorities remain in full 
force and effect. Consequently, Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program 
assures that the interstate, intrastate and Federal-State coordination 
required by Sections 404(h)(1)(E) and (H) shall take place through the 
MDNR.
    A number of commenters noted that the Michigan Attorney General's 
Statement failed to specifically mention that MDNR, rather than MWRC, 
would be responsible for the interstate, intrastate and Federal-State 
coordination described above. According to these commenters, this 
claimed failure rendered Michigan's modified program description 
``deficient on its face and, as a matter of law, [provides] an 
inadequate basis for public comment and provides EPA with an inadequate 
basis on which to determine whether or not the Michigan wetlands 
permitting program currently complies with applicable federal 
requirements.'' EPA disagrees.
    The basis for these commenters concern is their apparent belief 
that EPA must limit its review in this matter to the documents included 
with Michigan's December 15, 1993 letter to EPA, which included the 
Attorney General's Statement and Michigan's original October 26, 1983 
program description. However, 40 CFR 233.16(d)(1) provides that a State 
may submit ``a modified program description or other documents which 
[EPA] determines to be necessary to evaluate whether the program 
complies with the requirements of the Act and this part'' (emphasis 
added). As described above, Michigan submitted a number of other 
documents to EPA in addition the December 15, 1993 letter, including a 
September 20, 1993 letter from Michigan which contained Executive Order 
1991-31. As noted above, EPA's determination that Michigan's Section 
404 wetlands program assures interstate, intrastate and Federal-State 
coordination is based upon the Attorney General's Statement, Michigan's 
October 26, 1983 program description, and Executive Order 1991-31. All 
of these documents were included in the administrative record which was 
made available for public review after EPA made its preliminary 
determination on April 21, 1994.
    The third set of comments regarding how Executive Order 1991-31 
effected a change in public participation requirements pertained to the 
roles formerly played by the MWRC and the Michigan Natural Resources 
Commission (``MNRC'') as public ``sounding boards'' and sources of 
information pertaining to wetlands issues. According to these 
commentators, Executive Order 1991-31, in abolishing the MWRC and 
changing the role of the MNRC effected a change in public participation 
because the public now has less of an opportunity to understand issues 
or being decided or express concerns regarding the state's wetland 
program. EPA does not agree that this represents a change in the public 
particpation provisions of Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program.
    As described above, Michigan's original October 26, 1983 program 
description indicated that federal public participation requirements 
would be met based upon state statutory and regulatory requirements 
applicable to MDNR. There is nothing in Michigan's original program 
description which indicated that either MWRC or MNRC would play any 
role as part of Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program in assuring 
compliance with federal public particpation requirements. Consequently, 
although these commissions may in fact have provided the public 
additional opportunities to receive information about and to comment on 
wetland issues, those opportunities were above and beyond the 
opportunities which were reviewed and approved by EPA as part of 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program. Consequently, the abolishment 
of MWRC and change in role for MNRC did not revise the public 
participation provisions of Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program.
    There were a number of comments regarding perceived changes in 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program that have occurred since it was 
first approved by EPA in 1984, but which were not related in any way to 
Executive Order 1991-31. For example, commenters suggested that 
Michigan agencies and courts have interpreted the ``feasible and 
prudent alternatives'' test under Michigan law in a manner inconsistent 
with the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) guidelines.
    As was stated in the April 21, 1994, Federal Register notice, EPA's 
review in this matter is limited to a review of the revisions in 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program that have resulted from 
Executive Order 1991-31. A number of commenters stated that EPA cannot 
so limit its review. These commenters pointed to 40 CFR 233.1(b) which 
provides that ``[p]artial State programs are not approvable under 
section 404.'' EPA does not agree that 40 CFR 233.1(b) is applicable 
here.
    The prohibition on approval of ``[p]artial State programs'' at 40 
CFR 233.1(b) comes into play at the time when a state is initially 
seeking federal approval of its Section 404 wetlands program. At that 
time, there is no Section 404 wetlands program in the state. If the 
state fails to address all of the Section 404 requirements, 40 CFR 
233.1(b) would prohibit EPA from approving the program. The present 
matter involves review of possible revisions to Michigan's already 
approved Section 404 wetlands program.
    40 CFR 233.16 contains the requirements pertaining to program 
revisions. 40 CFR 233.16(a) requires that a State keep EPA informed of 
changes in the State's statutory or regulatory authority or other 
modifications which are significant to administration of the State's 
authorized program. Under 40 CFR 233.16(e), EPA may request and a State 
must provide documents or information whenever EPA believes that 
circumstances have changed with respect to the State's program. 
Finally, whenever EPA or a State finds that the State program is in 
need of revision, EPA must review and approve or disapprove of such 
revision. 40 CFR 233.16(d).
    In the present matter, EPA requested that Michigan submit 
information to EPA pursuant to 40 CFR 233.16 on whether any revisions 
occurred in Michigan's federally approved Section 404 wetlands program 
as a result of Executive Order 1991-31. EPA has not requested 
information pertaining to any other issues regarding Michigan's Section 
404 wetlands program. EPA is therefore limiting its review to the 
effects of Executive Order 1991-31.
    EPA appreciates the comments received on these matters, has 
forwarded them to Michigan and will consider them in the context of 
EPA's ongoing oversight of Michigan's wetlands program. If, in the 
course of its ongoing oversight, EPA determines that a program revision 
has occurred in any of the ways described in the comments, EPA will 
take the appropriate steps as set forth at 40 CFR 233.16 to review and 
approve or disapprove of the revisions.
    There was one other comment, in addition to the comment pertaining 
to the feasible and prudent alternatives test, which suggested that 
Michigan's wetland program failed to comply with the Clean Water Act 
and its implementing regulations. This comment was that Executive Order 
1991-31 has ``substantially changed the criteria and burden of proof by 
which the permitting agency routinely reviews or decides upon permits, 
thereby allowing agency action to take place without assurance of 
minimum-floor compliance with the Section 404(b) guidelines as required 
by 40 CFR 233, part 50.'' According to the commenter, ``[t]he Michigan 
Department of Natural Resources's (``MDNR'') flow-chart for decision 
making * * * allows an agency to apply overly vague and broad 
evidentiary tests to routine agency decisions when considering issuance 
of wetland permits.''
    EPA does not agree that Executive Order 1991-31 has caused the 
changes suggested by the commenter. There is no indication in any of 
the materials submitted by Michigan regarding any changes in criteria 
or burden of proof for decisionmaking. EPA is not aware of any MDNR 
``flow-chart'' that addresses wetland issues. The sole flow-charts in 
the documents submitted by Michigan to EPA are flow charts contained in 
a December 13, 1991 Draft Plan for the Implementation of Executive 
Order 1991-31. Those flow-charts specifically pertain to National 
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits and permits to 
construct air emission sources. The December 13, 1991 Draft Plan also 
specifically states that the wetland permitting process remains 
unchanged by Executive Order 1991-31.
    The United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service 
provided comments noting that it agreed with EPA that Executive Order 
1991-31 did not effect any substantial revisions in Michigan's Section 
404 wetland program. The Fish and Wildlife Service also noted that 
there are a number of federally listed threatened and endangered 
species present in Michigan and that, if EPA determines that EPA's 
approval or disapproval of the revisions in Michigan's Section 404 
wetlands program may affect these species, EPA would be required under 
Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act to consult with the Fish and 
Wildlife Service.
    As described above, Executive Order 1991-31 has not caused any 
substantive changes in Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program. 
Instead, the only effects that Executive Order 1991-31 have had on 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program have been to reorganize the 
MDNR and transfer certain authorities and duties of the MWRC to MDNR. 
EPA therefore has determined that its approval of these revisions in 
Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program will not affect endangered 
species.
    A number of commenters noted that, pursuant to 40 CFR 
Sec. 233.16(c), a state may not transfer all or part of its Section 404 
program ``from the approved State agency to any other State agency'' 
until the new agency is approved by EPA. These commenters claimed that 
Executive Order 1991-31 effectively abolished the ``old'' MDNR and 
created a ``new'' MDNR. These commenters suggested that this transfer 
of authority from the ``old'' MDNR to the ``new'' MDNR constituted a 
transfer of authority from an ``approved Agency to any other State 
agency.''
    EPA has determined that the revisions to Michigan's Section 404 
wetlands program resulting from Executive Order 1991-31 are consistent 
with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and its implementing 
regulations. Consequently, MDNR is authorized to administer Michigan's 
Section 404 wetland program. The question of whether MDNR remained the 
same agency or whether it became ``any other State agency'' as a result 
of Executive Order 1991-31, and therefore whether it was authorized to 
administer Michigan's Section 404 wetlands program, is not at issue 
here. Nevertheless, due to the significant number of comments on this 
issue, EPA believes it is appropriate to address this question here.
    EPA recognizes that the Michigan Supreme Court has made clear that 
Executive Order 1991-31 created a ``new'' MDNR. Dodak v. Engler, 443 
Mich. 560 (1993). However, the Michigan Attorney General, in a letter 
dated November 8, 1993, has stated that the Executive Order did not 
create a new agency. In either event, the question of whether MDNR is a 
``new'' agency under state law is not controlling with respect to 
whether there has been a transfer of authority from an ``approved 
Agency to any other State agency.'' Instead, it is EPA's regulations 
which are controlling on this issue.
    EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 233.16(c) do not provide clear guidance 
on whether the reorganization and consolidation of environmental 
programs accomplished by Executive Order 1991-31 constitutes a 
``transfer'' of authority requiring prior EPA approval. The preamble to 
the 1988 state wetland program regulations similarly fails to provide 
any such guidance. See 53 FR 20764 (June 6, 1988). However, the 1980 
preamble to the final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 
(``NPDES'') state program rule, in addressing language at 40 CFR 
123.62(c) which is similar to that at 40 CFR 233.16(c), stated:

    It was not the intent of the proposal nor is it of these final 
regulations to require EPA review in such cases [``nominal changes'' 
in state agencies]. Only when controlling Federal or State statutory 
or regulatory authority is modified or supplemented, or when the 
State proposes to transfer all or part of a program from an approved 
State agency to another State agency may EPA approval be necessary. 
Changes solely to the internal structure of an approved State 
agency, with no changes in the overall authority of the agency, do 
not require EPA approval.

    45 FR 33290, 33384 (May 19, 1980).
    Consistent with the above preamble language, EPA interprets the 
language of 40 CFR 233.16(c) as not applying to a mere restructuring or 
internal consolidation of environmental programs within a state's 
executive branch. Instead, the prior EPA approval requirement in 40 CFR 
233.16(c) applies in situations where such restructuring or 
consolidation impacts the controlling authorities by which a state 
implements the Section 404 wetland program.
    As described above, MDNR has been the approved State agency for 
implementation of Michigan's Section 404 wetland program both before 
and after the Executive Order. MDNR's authority and responsibilities 
under State law pertaining to wetland matters were not affected by 
Executive Order 1991-31. Consequently, there have been no changes of 
any significance to the function or structure of the portions of MDNR 
that has been approved to implement Michigan's Section 404 wetland 
program. Therefore, EPA does not agree with the commenters that 
Executive Order 1991-31 constituted a transfer of authority from an 
``approved Agency to any other State agency.''
    Finally, a number of commenters requested that EPA provide a public 
hearing on this matter. Pursuant to 40 CFR 233.16(d)(3), EPA is 
required to provide an opportunity for a public hearing whenever a 
proposed revision is substantial. 40 CFR 233.16(d)(3) provides that 
``substantial revisions include, but are not limited to, revisions that 
affect the area of jurisdiction, scope of activities regulated, 
criteria for review of permits, public participation, or enforcement 
capability.''
    EPA has determined that Executive Order 1991-31, in reorganizing 
MDNR and transferring responsibilities for assuring interstate, 
intrastate and federal-state coordination on wetland matters from MWRC 
to MDNR, has not affected a substantial change in Michigan's Section 
404 wetlands program. EPA notes that these changes have not affected 
any of the items listed in 40 CFR 233.16(d)(3). Moreover, EPA has found 
that the comments sufficiently addressed any issues relevant to the 
effects of Executive Order 1991-31 and therefore has determined that a 
public hearing would not be useful to aid in this review. EPA, 
therefore, is not providing an opportunity for a public hearing.

III. EPA's Final Determination

    EPA, after review and consideration of all the information 
submitted by Michigan and the comments received, has determined that 
the revisions to Michigan's wetland program effected by Executive Order 
1991-31 comply with the Clean Water Act and its implementing 
regulations. Moreover, EPA has determined that the revisions were not 
substantial.

    Dated: November 3, 1994.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-28972 Filed 11-23-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P