[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-28291]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: November 16, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[CO9-3-5603; FRL-5106-6]

 

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Colorado; Regulation 7

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Colorado Ozone 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Governor on September 
27, 1989, and August 30, 1990. The revisions consist of amendments to 
Regulation No. 7, ``Regulation To Control Emissions of Volatile Organic 
Compounds.'' In its review of the September 27, 1989 State submittal, 
EPA identified several areas where the regulation still did not meet 
EPA requirements. On August 30, 1990, the State submitted additional 
revisions to Regulation No. 7 to address these deficiencies. This 
Federal Register action applies to both of these submittals. The 
amendments were made to conform Regulation No. 7 to federal 
requirements, and to improve the clarity and enforceability of the 
regulation. EPA's approval will serve to make the revisions federally 
enforceable and was requested by the State of Colorado.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 1994.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: Douglas M. Skie, 
Chief Air Programs Branch (8ART-AP), United States Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, suite 500, Denver, 
Colorado 80202-2466.
    Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for 
public inspection between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday at 
the following office: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region VIII, Air Programs Branch, 999 18th Street, suite 500, Denver, 
Colorado 80202-2466.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Russ, Air Programs Branch (8ART-
AP), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 
18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466 (303) 293-1814.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 110(a)(2)(H)(i) of the Clean Air Act 
(CAA), as amended in 1990, provides the State the opportunity to amend 
its SIP from time to time as may be necessary. The State is utilizing 
this authority of the CAA to update and revise existing regulations 
which are a part of the SIP.

I. Background

    On March 3, 1978, EPA designated the Denver-Boulder metropolitan 
area as nonattainment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards 
(NAAQS) for ozone (43 FR 8976). This designation was reaffirmed by EPA 
on November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56694) pursuant to section 107(d)(1) of the 
CAA, as amended in 1990. Furthermore, since the Denver-Boulder area had 
not shown a violation of the ozone standard during the three-year 
period from January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1989, the Denver-Boulder 
area was classified as a ``transitional'' ozone nonattainment area 
under section 185A of the amended Act. In order to meet the Reasonably 
Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements of the CAA, 
transitional areas must correct any RACT deficiencies regarding 
enforceability.
    The current Colorado Ozone SIP was approved by EPA in the Federal 
Register on December 12, 1983 (48 FR 55284). The SIP contains 
Regulation No. 7 (Reg 7), which applies RACT to stationary sources of 
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Reg 7 was adopted to meet the 
requirements of Section 172(b)(2) and (3) of the 1977 CAA (concerning 
the application of RACT to stationary sources.1) However, the 
approved Ozone SIP did not rely on the emissions reduction credit that 
Reg 7 would produce in order to demonstrate attainment; rather, the SIP 
relied only on mobile source controls in order to demonstrate 
attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\The requirement to apply RACT to existing stationary sources 
of VOC emissions was carried forth under the amended Act in section 
172(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During 1987 and 1988, EPA Region VIII conducted a review of Reg 7 
for consistency with the Control Techniques Guidelines documents (CTGs) 
and regulatory guidance, for enforceability and for clarity. The CTGs, 
which are guidance documents issued by EPA, set forth measures that are 
presumptively RACT for specific categories of sources that emit VOCs. A 
substantial number of deficiencies were identified in Reg 7. In 1987, 
EPA published a proposed policy document that included, among other 
things, an interpretation of the RACT requirements as they applied to 
VOC nonattainment areas (52 FR 45044, November 24, 1987, Post-87 
Policy). On May 25, 1988, EPA published a guidance document entitled 
``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 
Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of the November 24, 1987 
Federal Register Notice'' (the ``Blue Book''). A review of Reg 7 
against these documents uncovered additional deficiencies in the 
regulation.
    On May 26, 1988, EPA notified the Governor of Colorado that the 
Carbon Monoxide (CO) SIPs for Colorado Springs and Fort Collins were 
inadequate to achieve the CO NAAQS. In that letter, EPA also notified 
the Governor that the Ozone SIP had significant deficiencies in design 
and implementation, and requested that these deficiencies be remedied. 
EPA did not make a formal call for a revised Ozone SIP in the May 1988 
letter,2 even though the Denver-Boulder area was, and continues to 
be, designated nonattainment for ozone. The reason for this decision 
was that no violations of the ozone NAAQS had been recorded in the 
nonattainment area for the previous three years. However, EPA indicated 
that the deficiencies, if uncorrected, could jeopardize the area's 
ability to obtain eventual redesignation as an attainment area for 
ozone.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\Under the pre-amended Act, EPA had the authority under 
section 110(a)(2)(H) to issue a ``SIP Call'' requiring a State to 
correct deficiencies in an existing SIP. Section 110(a)(2)(H) was 
not modified by the 1990 Amendments. In addition, the amended Act 
contains new section 110(k)(5) which also provides authority for a 
SIP Call.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. 1989 SIP Revision Submittal

    In a letter dated September 27, 1989, the Governor of Colorado 
submitted revisions to Reg 7 to partially address EPA's concerns with 
the Ozone SIP. A detailed description of the specific revisions to the 
regulation is contained in the Docket for this Federal Register 
document. Revisions were made to the following sections of Reg 7:

7.I  Applicability
7.II  General Provisions
7.III  General Requirements for Storage and Transfer of Volatile 
Organic Compounds
7.IV  Storage of Highly Volatile Organic Compounds
7.V  Disposal of Volatile Organic Compounds
7.VI  Storage and Transfer of Petroleum Liquid
7.VIII  Petroleum Processing and Refining
7.IX  Surface Coating Operations
7.X  Use of Solvents for Degreasing and Cleaning
7.XI  Use of Cutback Asphalt
7.XII  Control of VOC Emissions from Dry Cleaning Facilities Using 
Perchloroethylene As a Solvent
7.XIII  Graphic Arts
7.XIV  Pharmaceutical Synthesis
7.XV  Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Vapor 
Collection Systems Located At Gasoline Terminals, Bulk Plants, and 
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities
Appendix A  Criteria for Control of Vapors from Gasoline Transfer to 
Storage Tanks
Appendix B  Criteria for Control of Vapors from Gasoline Transfer at 
Bulk Plants (Vapor Balance System)
Appendix D  Test Procedures for Annual Pressure/Vacuum Testing of 
Gasoline Transport Trucks

    In addition, the following new emission sources and appendices were 
added to Reg 7:

7.IX.A.7  Fugitive Emission Control
7.IX.N.  Flat Wood Paneling Coating
7.IX.O.  Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires
7.XI.D.  Coal Tar
Appendix E  Emission Limit Conversion Procedure

    In a letter dated September 27, 1989, the Governor of Colorado 
submitted revisions to Reg 7 to address EPA's concerns with how the 
State was addressing RACT for major non-CTG sources of VOC. A detailed 
description of the specific revisions to the regulation is contained in 
the Docket for this Federal Register document. Based upon the reasons 
stated below, EPA is approving the State's non-CTG rule for its 
strengthening effect on the SIP.
    Areas of the country which requested extensions of the attainment 
date for the ozone NAAQS beyond the initial 1982 target specified in 
the CAA, as amended in 1977, were required to submit SIP revisions by 
July 1, 1982 (46 FR 7182, January 22, 1981). This requirement applied 
to the Denver-Boulder metropolitan area. The 1982 submittal was 
required to include RACT regulations for all sources of VOC covered by 
a CTG and for all remaining stationary sources in the nonattainment 
area with potential to emit VOC emissions (before control) of 100 tons 
per year or greater (``major non-CTG sources'').
    This 1982 Ozone SIP revision was submitted to EPA on June 24, 1982. 
Among other deficiencies, the SIP did not contain regulations requiring 
RACT on major non-CTG sources of VOC. EPA noted this deficiency in 
February 3, 1983, but proposed approval of the submitted SIP revision 
(48 FR 5030). The State responded by committing to adopt RACT for any 
VOC sources covered by a CTG and EPA approved this revision on December 
12, 1983 (48 FR 55284).
    EPA's review of the Ozone SIP during 1987 and 1988 revealed that 
the intent of the requirement for RACT for major non-CTG sources had 
not been met. EPA tentatively identified several stationary sources 
which should have applied RACT since 1982, but were as yet unregulated. 
Reg 7 contained no mechanism for requiring control of these sources, 
other than a ``General Emission Limitation,'' for sources not 
specifically regulated by Reg 7, of 450 pounds per hour or 3000 pounds 
per day. This general limitation allowed sources to have actual 
emissions of up to nearly 550 tons per year before control was 
required. This provision clearly did not meet the 1982 SIP requirement, 
which was reiterated in the May 25, 1998, Appendix D Clarification 
document.
    To address this concern, the State revised Reg 7 to delete the 
existing ``General Emission Limitation'' and to require RACT for 
stationary sources with potential emissions of VOC of 100 tons per year 
or more, under certain conditions. Section 7.II.C. applies this new 
RACT requirement to sources not specifically covered by the regulation 
as follows:
    (a) Sources with actual emissions of 100 tons per year or more of 
VOCs must apply RACT.
    (b) Sources with potential emissions of 100 tons per year or more 
of VOCs, but with actual emissions of less than 100 tons per year, may 
avoid having to apply RACT by obtaining a federally enforceable permit 
to limit production or hours of operation to keep actual emissions 
below 100 tons per year.
    (c) Sources with potential emissions of 100 tons per year or more 
of VOCs, but with actual emissions of less than 50 tons per year on a 
12-month rolling average, may avoid RACT and permit requirements by: 
(1) Submitting a report each year demonstrating that the 50 tons per 
year threshold has not been exceeded; and (2) maintaining monthly 
records of VOC usage and emissions to enable the State to verify these 
reports.
    The State developed this approach to regulating 100 tons per year 
non-CTG sources after receiving comments on the proposed Reg 7 
revisions from several industries in the Denver-Boulder area. These 
sources indicated that their processes involved a number of non-CTG 
category operations that are performed infrequently (such as painting 
letters on four production units per year), resulting in low actual 
emissions, but which would result in large potential emissions when 
calculated on an 8760 hour per year basis.
    EPA is approving section 7.II.C. of the State's rules for its 
strengthening effect on the SIP. The submitted rule is stronger than 
the pre-existing non-CTG RACT rule because it specifically applies to 
sources that have a potential to emit more than 100 tons per year of 
VOCs and that are not yet covered by a CTG. The rule requires those 
sources to adopt RACT on a case-by-case basis. The previous rule, which 
was a commitment of the State and did not directly affect non-CTG 
sources, only applied to those sources for which EPA subsequently 
issued a CTG. Therefore, the submitted rule strengthens the SIP because 
it applies to major sources not covered by a CTG. It should be noted 
that EPA is not addressing whether this rule establishes RACT for major 
stationary sources not subject to a CTG.
    The Denver-Boulder metropolitan area is classified as 
``transitional'' for ozone under the CAA. This means that the area is 
legally designated as an ozone nonattainment area, although it did not 
experience violations of the ozone NAAQS during the 1987-1989 period 
used to classify areas under the 1990 CAA amendments. Therefore, the 
Denver-Boulder metropolitan area is not subject to the RACT fix-up 
requirement of Section 182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA.
    Under the transitional ozone classification, EPA must review the 
available ambient air quality data and make a determination whether the 
Denver-Boulder metropolitan area has, in fact, attained the ozone 
NAAQS. In a letter dated October 22, 1992, from Jack McGraw, EPA Region 
VIII Acting Regional Administrator, to Governor Roy Romer, EPA Region 
VIII advised the State that EPA had reviewed ambient air quality data 
which had been entered by the State into the Aerometric Information and 
Retrieval System (AIRS) national database. EPA further advised that 
these data indicated that the Denver-Boulder metropolitan transitional 
ozone area, as defined in the November 6, 1991 Federal Register (56 FR 
56694, codified at 40 CFR 81.306), had not violated the ozone NAAQS 
during the period beginning January 1, 1987, and ending on December 31, 
1991. EPA's October 22, 1992 letter was not a determination that the 
Denver-Boulder nonattainment area had met the CAA's Section 
107(d)(3)(E) criteria for redesignation to attainment, but rather 
served as an affirmation that no violation of the ozone standard for 
this area was found.
    The State has indicated, in the current State-EPA Agreement (SEA), 
that it will begin developing an ozone redesignation request and 
maintenance plan for the Denver-Boulder metropolitan area. The 
maintenance plan must demonstrate that the ozone NAAQS will be 
maintained for an initial period of 10 years after the redesignation 
request is approved by EPA. The maintenance plan must be updated, after 
8 years into the initial 10-year period, to demonstrate that the NAAQS 
will be maintained for an additional 10 years. During the development 
of the maintenance plan, the State may consider additional revisions to 
the ozone control strategy in order to demonstrate maintenance of the 
ozone standard; such revisions could include further modification of 
the VOC control requirements of Reg 7. For a maintenance plan to be 
approved and the Denver-Boulder metropolitan area to be redesignated as 
attainment pursuant to Section 107(d)(3)(E), the State may have to 
develop specific RACT regulations for major non-CTG sources. 
Information available to EPA suggests that there has been growth in 
emissions from some non-CTG sources in the area; RACT regulations for 
these sources may be necessary to ensure maintenance of the NAAQS for 
the initial 10-year redesignation attainment period, as is required by 
Section 175A of the Act.

2. 1990 SIP Revision Submittal

    In general, the revised Reg 7 ( as submitted by the Governor on 
September 27, 1989) met the CAA requirements, which were interpreted in 
the CTGs, the Blue Book, and the Post-87 Policy. However, in its 
review, EPA identified two remaining issues where the regulation did 
not explicitly follow EPA guidance: A. The compliance schedule, and B. 
Clarification of the Graphic Arts definition for potential to emit. 
These remaining two issues were addressed by the State in its August 
30, 1990 submittal and are described below.
    In a letter dated August 30, 1990, the Governor of Colorado 
submitted revisions to Reg 7 to address EPA's remaining concerns with 
the September 27, 1989 Ozone SIP revision. A detailed description of 
the additional specific revisions to Reg 7 is contained in the Docket 
for this Federal Register document. Revisions were made to the 
following sections of Reg 7:

7.I  Applicability
7.XI  Use of Cutback Asphalt
7.XIII  Graphic Arts

    A. Compliance Schedule: Reg 7 did not contain an explicit deadline 
for compliance with the revised regulation. In response to EPA 
comments, the State adopted additional revisions (Section 7.I.B. and 
7.I.C.) to Section 7.I. (Applicability) of Reg 7, requiring all sources 
to come into compliance with the revised Reg 7 by October 31, 1991. EPA 
considered a 2-year timeframe for compliance with the Reg 7 revisions 
to be acceptable because no ozone SIP Call was made in 1988 (no 
violations of the ozone NAAQS have been monitored in the Denver-Boulder 
area since 1984) and thus, the revisions were not immediately necessary 
for the area to attain the NAAQS. The 2-year compliance timeframe 
applies only to the regulation revisions, and not to requirements which 
existed prior to October 30, 1989. Sources which were in existence 
prior to the regulation revisions and which were covered by the 
regulations at that time were required to maintain compliance with 
those provisions.
    B. Graphic Arts definition: The Graphic Arts definition of 
potential to emit, contained in Section 7.XIII.A.2. of Reg 7, was 
somewhat unclear. The definition referenced the EPA requirement that 
potential to emit be determined at maximum capacity before control (per 
the Appendix D Clarification document), but also included a requirement 
that potential emissions be based on historical records of solvent and 
ink consumption (per the previous regulatory guidance document, 
Guidance to State and Local Agencies in Preparing Regulations to 
Control Volatile Organic Compounds from Ten Stationary Source 
Categories, September, 1979). As a result, the definition could have 
been interpreted to require potential to emit to be calculated at both 
maximum and historical operating rates, which in most cases will be 
different. EPA's interpretation of this definition was that potential 
to emit should be calculated at maximum capacity before control; 
historical records of solvent and ink consumption should be used to 
determine VOC emissions at a given operating rate, not to determine the 
historical maximum operating rate. The Reg 7 revisions, submitted by 
the Governor on August 30, 1990, addressed this concern by not 
including a reference to the historical records.
    C. Capture Efficiency: As a final issue, on January 13, 1992, EPA 
notified the State that, prior to proposing this action, it was 
necessary to document the State's position with regard to capture 
efficiency (CE) determination. During earlier reviews of the State's 
VOC regulations, EPA Region VIII indicated that, because EPA had not 
issued final, generally-applicable CE test methods, an acceptable State 
approach to CE was a commitment to develop test methods consistent with 
the most recent EPA guidance on CE testing on a case-by-case basis as 
needed, and a commitment to adopt test methods after EPA issued final 
CE test methods. The CE provision adopted by the State in Section 
IX.A.5.e of Reg 7 does address the requirement that testing for CE be 
performed on a case-by-case basis, and that this testing be consistent 
with EPA guidance. In a letter dated February 5, 1992, from John Leary, 
Acting Director, Colorado Air Pollution Control Division, to Douglas 
Skie, Chief, Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VIII, the State committed 
to adopt and use all new CE methods as they are developed and 
promulgated by EPA's rule-making process. In that same letter, the 
State indicated that until changes are promulgated, the Air Pollution 
Control Division will use the CE protocols that were published by EPA 
on June 29, 1990 (55 FR 26814, codified at 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii) and 
Appendix B).
    Due to additional information received after the adoption of 
revisions to Reg 7 in September, 1989, the State reconsidered its 
regulation of coal tar under Section 7.XI. (Use of Cutback Asphalt). In 
revisions submitted on August 30, 1990, Section 7.XI.D., covering coal 
tar, was deleted. Regulation of coal tar is not covered by the CTG for 
cutback asphalt use; EPA believes that it is not needed to meet the 
RACT requirement of the CAA.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\Under section 193 of the amended CAA, States cannot delete 
control requirements in effect prior to enactment of the amendments 
unless the modification ensures equivalent or greater emission 
reductions of the same air pollutant. By this same submittal, the 
State has submitted additional control requirements that more than 
compensate for any greater emissions that may result from the 
deletion of the coal tar regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this action, EPA is proposing to approve the State's VOC 
definition as submitted in the 1989 and 1990 revisions to Reg 7. 
However, on February 3, 1992, EPA published a revised definition of 
volatile organic compounds (57 FR 3941). The definition excludes a 
number of organic compounds from the definition of VOC on the basis 
that they are of negligible reactivity and do not contribute to 
tropospheric ozone formation. The State's definition excludes some, but 
not all, of these compounds. Therefore, the State's definition of VOC 
provides for the regulation of some compounds which are no longer 
considered VOCs by EPA. In light of EPA's most recent definition of 
VOC, EPA will not enforce against sources for failure to control the 
emission of compounds that are exempt from the federal VOC definition. 
EPA has informed the Region VIII States of the revised definition of 
VOC and will request that future SIP revisions reflect the most recent 
federal VOC definition.
    Based on the above revisions, EPA believes that Colorado has met 
the ozone RACT requirement of the CAA as it applies to the Denver-
Boulder metropolitan area. Colorado has corrected its RACT rule 
deficiencies regarding enforceability.
    This action was previously published as a Direct Final Rule on June 
26, 1992 (57 FR 28614). This Direct Final Rule was withdrawn on August 
12, 1992 (57 FR 36004) as EPA Region VIII received a letter, dated July 
16, 1992, from William Owens, Executive Director of the Colorado 
Petroleum Association (CPA), to Jeff Houk of EPA Region VIII, 
expressing adverse comments. These comments will be considered by EPA 
during the comment period, along with any other comments that are 
received on this proposed rule.

II. Proposed Action

    EPA proposes to approve Colorado's Ozone SIP revisions, submitted 
by the Governor on September 27, 1989, and August 30, 1990. These 
revisions consist of amendments to Reg 7.
    Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
revision to any State Implementation Plan. Each request for revision to 
any State Implementation Plan shall be considered separately in light 
of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
50,000.
    SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the CAA 
do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the federal SIP-
approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify that it does 
not have significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover, 
due to the nature of the federal-state relationship under the CAA, 
preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute 
federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. 
Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    This action has been classified as a Table 2 action by the Regional 
Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on 
January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an October 4, 1993, 
memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for 
Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget has exempted 
this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
    The Agency has reviewed this request for revision of the federally-
approved SIP for conformance with the provisions of the 1990 Amendments 
to the Clean Air Act enacted on November 15, 1990. The Agency has 
determined that this action conforms with those requirements 
irrespective of the fact that the submittal preceded the date of 
enactment.
    Approval of this specific revision to the SIP does not indicate EPA 
approval of the SIP in its entirety.
    Interested parties are invited to comment on all aspects of this 
proposed action.

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this rule from the 
requirements of Section 6 of Executive Order 12866.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
Plan for the State of Colorado was approved by the Director of the 
Federal Register on July 1, 1980.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: October 13, 1994.
Jack W. McGraw,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-28291 Filed 11-15-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P