[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-23350]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: September 21, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[CT-11-1-5813; ME-11-1-6313; RI-10-1-6319; VT-6-1-6312; A-1-FRL-5076-5]

 

Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Emission Statement 
Implementation Plans for Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing full approval of revisions to the respective 
State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the following four States: 
Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Revisions to the SIP 
were submitted by each of these four States to implement an emission 
statement program for stationary sources throughout the State. 
Connecticut submitted section 22a-174-4(c)(1), ``Recordkeeping and 
Reporting,'' and amendments to the SIP narrative entitled ``Revision to 
State Implementation Plan for Air Quality Emission Statements'' on 
January 12, 1993. On January 3, 1994, Maine submitted Chapter 137, 
``Emission Statements'' and amendments to Chapter 100, ``Definitions.'' 
Rhode Island submitted amendments to Regulation Number 14 entitled 
``Record Keeping and Reporting'' on January 12, 1993. On August 9, 
1993, Vermont submitted a rule entitled ``Registration of Air 
Contaminant Sources,'' Sections 5-801 through 5-806, and a SIP 
Narrative, ``State of Vermont Air Quality Implementation Plan, February 
1993.'' These SIP revisions were submitted by the States to satisfy the 
Federal requirements for an emission statement program as part of the 
SIP.

COMMENTS: Public comments are solicited on the requested SIP revisions 
and on US EPA's proposal to approve.

DATES: Comments received in writing by October 21, 1994, will be 
considered in the development of US EPA's final rulemaking action.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed to Linda M. Murphy, Director, Air, 
Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division, JFK Federal Building, 
Boston, MA 02203. Copies of the States' submittals and other 
information are available for inspection during normal business hours, 
by appointment, at the following location: Air, Pesticides and Toxics 
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, 
One Congress Street, 10th floor, Boston, MA 02203. In addition, 
Connecticut's submittal is available at the Bureau of Air Management, 
Department of Environmental Protection, State Office Building, 165 
Capitol Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106; Maine's submittal is available the 
Bureau of Air Quality Control, Department of Environmental Protection, 
State House, Station 17, Augusta, ME 04333; Rhode Island's submittal is 
available at the Division of Air and Hazardous Materials, Department of 
Environmental Management, 291 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-
5767; and Vermont's submittal is available at the Air Pollution Control 
Division, Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental 
Management, Building 3 South, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 
05676.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daria L. Dilaj, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Building (APS), Boston, MA 
02203; Phone: (617) 565-3249.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The air quality planning and State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
requirements for ozone nonattainment and transport areas are set out in 
subparts I and II of part D of title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended 
by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA or ``the Act''). EPA has 
published a ``General Preamble'' describing EPA's preliminary views on 
how EPA intends to review SIP's and SIP revisions submitted under title 
I of the CAA, including those State submittals for ozone transport 
areas within the States (see 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992) (``SIP: 
General Preamble for the Implementation of title I of the Clean Air Act 
Amendments of 1990''), 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992) (``Appendices to 
the General Preamble''), and 57 FR 55620 (November 25, 1992) (``SIP: 
NOX Supplement to the General Preamble'')).
    EPA has also issued a draft guidance document describing the 
requirements for the emission statement programs discussed in this 
Notice, entitled ``Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission 
Statement Program'' (July, 1992). The Agency is also conducting a 
rulemaking process to modify part 40 of the CFR to reflect the 
requirements of the emission statement program.
    Section 182 of the Act sets out a graduated control program for 
ozone nonattainment areas. Section 182(a) sets out requirements 
applicable in marginal nonattainment areas, which are also made 
applicable in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) to all other 
classified ozone nonattainment areas. Among the requirements in section 
182(a) is a program in paragraph (3) of that subsection for stationary 
sources to prepare and submit to the State each year emission 
statements showing actual emissions of volatile organic compounds and 
nitrogen oxides. This paragraph provides that the States are to submit 
a revision to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs) by November 15, 
1992 establishing this emission statement program.
    Section 184(b)(2) of the Act extends the requirements for major 
stationary sources in moderate ozone nonattainment areas to sources in 
the ozone transport region which emit, or have the potential to emit, 
50 tpy or more of VOC. Section 182(f) extends the requirements for 
major stationary sources of VOC in ozone transport regions to major 
sources of NOX. For areas designated as attainment or 
nonattainment areas which are not classified, section 182(f) refers to 
section 302 where the major source definition for NOX is the 
potential to emit 100 tons per year. Therefore, the emission statement 
requirement includes sources in attainment areas and nonattainment 
areas which are not classified within ozone transport regions which 
emit, or have the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of NOX or 50 
tpy or more of VOC.
    Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Maine are each located in 
the ozone transport region. The applicability of these States' emission 
statement regulations must be State-wide, and cover all stationary 
sources which emit or have the potential to emit 50 tpy of VOC or 100 
tpy of NOX. In addition, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and the 
following counties of Maine: Androscoggin, Cumberland, Hancock, 
Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Sagadahoc, Waldo, and York are classified 
ozone nonattainment areas and are therefore subject to the more 
stringent source threshold requirement of section 182(a)(3)(B). For 
these classified ozone nonattainment areas, the source threshold of 
these States' emission statement regulations must cover all sources 
which emit VOC or NOX.
    For classified ozone nonattainment areas, the States may waive, 
with EPA approval, the requirement for an emission statement for 
classes or categories of sources with less than 25 tons per year of 
actual plant-wide NOX or VOC emissions in nonattainment areas if 
the class or category is included in the base year and periodic 
inventories and emissions are calculated using emission factors 
established by EPA (such as those found in EPA publication AP-42) or 
other methods acceptable to EPA. Connecticut, Maine, and Rhode Island 
have provided 1990 baseyear inventories which include emissions from 
sources that emit below 25 tpy of VOC or NOX emissions and will be 
updating these inventories every three years until the area is 
redesignated to attainment. In addition, the methods and emission 
factors used by Connecticut, Maine, and Rhode Island to calculate 
emissions for the 1990 baseyear inventory have been reviewed by EPA. As 
a result, EPA finds the 25 tpy threshold acceptable.
    Additionally, if either VOC or NOX is emitted at or above the 
statutory reporting level, the other pollutant must be included in the 
emission statement, even if it is emitted at levels below the specified 
cutoffs.
    The CAA requires that States' rules specify that facilities must 
submit the first emission statement to the State within three years 
after November 15, 1990, and annually thereafter. EPA requests that the 
States submit the emission data to EPA through the Aerometric 
Information Retrieval System (AIRS). The minimum emission statement 
data should include: certification of data accuracy; source 
identification information; operating schedule; emissions information 
(including annual and typical ozone season day emissions); control 
equipment information; and process data. EPA developed emission 
statements data elements to be consistent with other source and State 
reporting requirements. This consistency is essential to assist States 
with quality assurance for emission estimates and to facilitate 
consolidation of all EPA reporting requirements.

II. Analysis of State Submission

A. Procedural Background

    The Act requires States to observe certain procedural requirements 
in developing its SIP, of which the emission statement program will 
become a part. Section 110(l)(2) of the Act provides that each revision 
to an implementation plan submitted by a State under the CAA must be 
adopted by such State after reasonable notice and public hearing. EPA 
must at the outset determine whether a submittal is complete and 
therefore warrants further EPA review and action (see section 110(k)(1) 
and 57 FR 13565). EPA's completeness criteria for SIP submittals are 
set out at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V (1991), as amended by 57 FR 42216 
(August 26, 1991).
    Connecticut held public hearings on the proposed changes to the SIP 
narrative on January 5, 6, and 7, 1993. Following the public hearing, 
Connecticut submitted the SIP revision to EPA on January 12, 1993. The 
SIP revision was reviewed by EPA and deemed complete on March 16, 1993. 
The State of Maine held a public hearing on Chapter 137 and amendments 
to Chapter 100 on July 14, 1993. Following the public hearing, the 
regulations were adopted by the State on November 10, 1993 and 
submitted to EPA on January 3, 1994. EPA deemed the submittal complete 
on February 16, 1994. Rhode Island held a public hearing on Regulation 
14, ``Record Keeping and Reporting'' on December 16, 1992. The 
regulation was adopted by the State on January 11, 1993. EPA received 
the submittal on January 12, 1993 and deemed the SIP revision complete 
in a March 9, 1993 letter. The State of Vermont held a public hearing 
on the proposed changes to the SIP narrative on March 10, 1993. Vermont 
submitted the SIP narrative and regulations 5-801 through 5-806 to EPA 
on August 10, 1993. On October 25, 1993, EPA deemed the submittal 
complete.
    EPA proposes to approve the emission statement program SIP 
submittals of Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island and Vermont and invites 
public comment on the action.

B. Components of the Emission Statement Program

    There are several key general and specific components of an 
acceptable emission statement program. Specifically, the State must 
submit a revision to its SIP and the emission statement program must 
meet the minimum requirements for reporting by the sources and the 
State. In general, the program must include, at a minimum, provisions 
for applicability, definitions, compliance, and specific source 
requirements detailed below.
1. SIP Revision Submission
    EPA requires States to submit their SIP revision within 2 years of 
enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) (November 15, 
1990).
    Connecticut and Rhode Island submitted their SIP revisions on 
January 12, 1993. Maine and Vermont were each notified in a letter 
dated January 15, 1993 that a finding of failure to submit a SIP for 
Emission Statements was made. Vermont submitted its SIP revision on 
August 9, 1993, and Maine submitted its SIP revision on January 3, 
1994. EPA reviewed these two submittals and, as outlined above, found 
them complete. Therefore, the sanctions clock was stopped for this plan 
element for each of these states. However, the January 15, 1993 finding 
also triggered the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) clock. EPA remains 
obligated to promulgate a FIP until a final rulemaking action to 
approve these two SIP revisions is taken.
2. Reporting Requirements for State
    In addition to the program elements applying to sources, the SIP 
should include a provision that States provide to EPA the identifying 
information for the sources covered by the emission statement program, 
the value for rule effectiveness utilized by the State in its SIP 
calculations, the source data elements entered into AIRS, and quarterly 
emission statement status reports. The minimum source identification 
information should include the AIRS code, the AFS point number (ID), 
the AFS segment number (ID), and the Source Category Code (SCC) and 
descriptions for each segment.
    In addition, States should supply to EPA the current rule 
effectiveness (RE) factors at the SCC pollutant level, if applicable, 
and the RE method codes. The emission statement data submittal to AIRS 
should include all data obtained from the source and the State. These 
source-supplied data elements include source identification information 
(name, physical location, mailing address of the facility, latitude and 
longitude, and 4-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 
code(s)), operating schedule information (percentage annual throughput, 
days per week on the normal operating schedule, hours per day during 
the normal operating schedule, and hours per year on the normal 
operating schedule), process rate data (annual process rate (annual 
throughput) and peak ozone season daily process rate), control 
equipment information (current primary and secondary control equipment 
identification codes and current combined control equipment efficiency 
(%)), and emissions information (estimated actual VOC and NOX 
emissions at the segment level (in tons per year for an annual emission 
rate and pounds per day for a typical ozone season day), estimated 
emissions method code, calendar year for the emissions, and emission 
factor (if used)). EPA recommends that the States electronically submit 
emission statement data into the AIRS database no later than July 1 of 
each year, commencing in 1993. The quarterly reports should show the 
total number of facilities that met the State's emission statements 
program requirements and the number of facilities that failed to meet 
the requirements. Quarterly reports should be submitted commencing no 
later than July 1, 1993.
    Connecticut commits to submitting data along with supplemental data 
to EPA by July 1. All the EPA required data elements will be covered. 
EPA will negotiate with Connecticut to include a requirement for 
quarterly emission statement reports in future 105 grants.
    Maine covers all the EPA required data elements. Maine has not 
committed to a data submittal date to EPA. Maine will not meet the 
present July 1 deadline of submitting data to EPA. Maine will, however, 
have plenty of time to meet the deadline of November 15 being proposed 
by the Emission Statement Workgroup. EPA will negotiate with Maine to 
include a requirement for quarterly emission statement reports in 
future 105 grants.
    Rhode Island's rule has covered all the EPA required data elements. 
Rhode Island has not committed to submitting emission statement data to 
EPA by July 1. EPA will negotiate with Rhode Island to include a 
requirement for quarterly emission statement reports in future 105 
grants.
    Vermont has committed to report all the necessary data elements to 
EPA by July 1 of each calendar year. Vermont states in its SIP 
narrative that for any emissions estimates which depend on rule 
enforcement for control of potential emissions, rule effectiveness will 
also be included in the submittal to EPA. EPA will negotiate with 
Vermont to include a requirement for quarterly emission statement 
reports in future 105 grants.
3. Sources Covered
    Section 182(a)(3)(B) requires that States with areas designated as 
nonattainment for ozone require emission statement data from all 
sources of VOC or NOX in the nonattainment areas. This requirement 
applies to all classified ozone nonattainment areas, regardless of the 
classification (Marginal, Moderate, etc.). Section 184(b)(2) of the Act 
extends the requirements for major stationary sources in moderate ozone 
nonattainment areas to sources in the ozone transport region. Section 
182(f) extends the requirements for major stationary sources of VOC in 
ozone transport regions to major sources of NOX. Therefore, the 
emission statement requirement encompasses all stationary sources in 
all classified nonattainment areas, as well as sources in attainment 
areas and unclassified nonattainment areas within ozone transport 
regions, which emit or have the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of 
NOX or 50 tpy or more of VOC.
    The States may waive, with EPA approval, the requirement for 
emission statements for classes or categories of sources with less than 
25 tons per year of actual plant-wide NOX or VOC emissions in 
nonattainment areas if the class or category is included in the base 
year and periodic inventories. Connecticut, Maine, and Rhode Island 
emission statement regulations have exempted sources with VOC and 
NOX emissions below 25 tpy from emission statement requirements. 
Connecticut, Maine, and Rhode Island have provided 1990 baseyear 
inventories which include emissions from sources that emit below 25 tpy 
of VOC or NOX emissions and will be updating these inventories 
every three years until the area is redesignated to attainment. In 
addition, the methods and emission factors used by Connecticut, Maine, 
and Rhode Island to calculate emissions for the 1990 baseyear inventory 
have been reviewed by EPA. As a result, EPA finds the 25 tpy threshold 
acceptable.
    The entire state of Connecticut is designated as nonattainment for 
ozone and is located within the boundaries of the ozone transport 
region. Connecticut's SIP narrative describes how for the first 
reporting year (1993), Connecticut will require an emission statement 
from each company whose actual 'calendar year 1992 emissions from all 
sources at a plant site total 25 tons per year or more of VOC, 
NOX, or CO. For the second reporting year (1994), the state will 
lower the reporting threshold to 5 tons per year or more of VOC, 
NOX, or CO. For the third (1995) and future reporting years, the 
state will expand the reporting requirement to 5 tons per year or more 
of any criteria pollutant (PM10, SOX, NOX, CO, VOC, Pb). If 
the 25 tpy (first year) or 5 tpy (later years) threshold is exceeded by 
any one pollutant, the company is required to supply data for all 
remaining pollutants addressed by the respective threshold criteria.
    The entire state of Maine is located within the boundaries of the 
ozone transport region. In addition, the following counties of Maine: 
Androscoggin, Cumberland, Hancock, Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Sagadahoc, 
Waldo, and York are classified ozone nonattainment areas and are 
therefore subject to the more stringent source threshold requirement of 
section 182(a)(3)(B). For these classified ozone nonattainment areas, 
EPA requires Maine's emission statement regulations to cover all 
sources which emit VOC or NOX unless the State waives requirements 
from sources with less than 25 tons per year of actual plant-wide 
NOX or VOC emissions. Maine's Chapter 137 is applicable to all 
stationary sources which emit, or have the potential to emit into the 
ambient air, the following air pollutants at or above the minimum 
required reporting level:

1. Carbon Monoxide, 100 tpy
2. Sulfur Dioxide, 40 tpy
3. Volatile organic compounds, 25 tpy
4. Nitrogen oxides, 25 tpy
5. Fine Particulate Matter, 15 tpy
6. Lead, 0.1 tpy

    In addition, this rule requires the reporting of 189 hazardous air 
pollutants identified by the CAA and other compounds known to be 
emitted in Maine that are of concern to human health. The list of 
pollutants can be found in Section 1(C) and Appendix A of Chapter 137. 
If any one pollutant as specified above is emitted at or above the 
minimum required reporting level, all the other pollutant data listed 
must be collected and reported.
    The entire state of Rhode Island is designated as nonattainment for 
ozone and is located within the boundaries of the ozone transport 
region. Section 14.3.1 states that the owner or operator of any 
facility emitting VOC or NOX which has or has had actual facility-
wide emissions of 25 tons per year or more of either pollutant in 1990 
or any year thereafter, shall submit annually an emission statement 
which includes both pollutants in accordance with the requirements of 
section 14.3.2. A facility may apply to the Division to be allowed to 
discontinue submitting annual emission statements if actual emissions 
at that facility decrease to below 10 tons per year as a result of a 
permanent process change.
    Although the entire state of Vermont is in attainment it is located 
within the ozone transport boundaries. EPA requires Vermont to regulate 
source which emit, or have the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of 
NOX or 50 tpy or more of VOC. Regulation 5-802 requires submittal 
of complete data from all sources of the five criteria pollutants which 
have actually emitted more than 5 tons of all of the criteria 
pollutants combined during the previous year.
4. Reporting Requirements for Sources
    Sources covered by the State emission statement program will 
submit, at a minimum, the data elements described under section II.B.2. 
of this document.
    The emission statement submitted by the source should contain a 
certification that the information is accurate to the best knowledge of 
the individual certifying the statement. EPA recommends that the State 
program require the submission of the data from the sources no later 
than April 15 of each year.
    Connecticut has required, in its SIP narrative, that sources submit 
their emission statement data no later than April 15 of each year. The 
emission statement forms sent out by DEP require all data elements 
described under section II.B.2. of this document. Along with the forms, 
a letter is sent which informs the source that accuracy of the data 
must be certified.
    Maine's Chapter 137 requires the owner or operator of any facility 
meeting the applicability requirements in section 1 of chapter 137 to 
submit an emission statement to the Department on an annual basis. The 
emission statement must be submitted no later than July 1 for the 
previous calendar year, beginning no later than July 1, 1994 for the 
calendar year 1993. EPA is proposing to approve this submittal date 
since the Emission Statement Workgroup is proposing to require States 
to submit emission statement data to AIRS by November 15 rather than 
July 1. Maine will have sufficient time to submit data to AIRS by 
November 15 if sources submit emission statements by July 1. Chapter 
137 also includes a list of data elements required by the sources and 
the demand for certification of the data's accuracy.
    Rhode Island's section 14.3.1 requires facilities to submit 
emission statements to the Director within 45 days of the end of the 
calendar year. Emission statements shall be submitted for the calendar 
year 1992 and for every year thereafter. Rhode Island requires each 
facility subject to section 14.3.1 to submit an emission statement in a 
format approved by the Director which contains all data elements 
described above and certification that the information contained in the 
emission statement is accurate.
    Vermont's rule, section 5-803, requires sources to submit to the 
Air Pollution Control Officer source emissions data and other 
information on or before February 1 of each year. Certification of the 
data is required.
5. Reporting Forms
    Although EPA has developed a proposed format for the emission 
statement reporting process in its guidance document, the Act allows 
States to develop their own format for emission statement reporting.
    Connecticut, Maine, and Vermont provide the sources with emission 
statement forms. Connecticut and Vermont included the forms with their 
SIP submittals. Rhode Island does not provide sources with an emission 
statement form; each facility subject to emission statement 
requirements must submit an emission statement in a format approved by 
the Director.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA has evaluated the States submittals for consistency with the 
Clean Air Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA has determined that 
the proposed rules meet the Clean Air Act's requirements and is 
proposing approval of the following rules under section 110(k)(3): 
Connecticut's section 22a-174-4(c)(1), ``Recordkeeping and Reporting;'' 
Rhode Island's regulation Number 14 entitled ``Record Keeping and 
Reporting;'' Vermont's rule entitled ``Registration of Air Contaminant 
Sources,'' Sections 5-801 through 5-806; Maine's Chapter 137, 
``Emission Statements'' and amendments to Chapter 100, ``Definitions;'' 
and the SIP narrative revisions of Connecticut entitled ``Revision to 
State Implementation Plan for Air Quality Emission Statements,'' and 
Vermont entitled ``State of Vermont Air Quality Implementation Plan, 
February 1993.'' Based upon EPA's evaluation of Connecticut's and Rhode 
Island's January 12, 1993 submittals, Vermont's August 9, 1993 
submittal, and Maine's January 3, 1994 submittal, EPA is proposing to 
approve the emission statement submissions as revisions to the ozone 
SIP.

IV. Request for Public Comments

    Public comments are solicited on the requested SIP revisions and on 
EPA's proposal to approve. Public comments received by October 21, 
1994, will be considered in the development of EPA's final rulemaking 
action.

V. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order (EO) 12866

    This action has been classified as a Table 2 action by the Regional 
Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on 
January 19, 1989. 54 FR 2214-2225. On January 6, 1989, the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) waived Table 2 and 3 SIP revisions, 54 FR 
2222, from the requirements of section 3 of Executive Order 12291 for a 
period of 2 years. US EPA has submitted a request for a permanent 
waiver for Table 2 and 3 SIP revisions. OMB has agreed to continue the 
temporary waiver until such time as it rules on US EPA's request. This 
request continues in effect under Executive Order 12866 which 
superseded Executive Order 12291 on September 30, 1993.

B. Regulatory Flexibility

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit 
enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations 
of less than 50,000.
    SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the 
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve 
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements, the 
Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on 
small entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the federal-state 
relationship under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility 
analysis would constitute federal inquiry into the economic 
reasonableness of state action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions 
concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 
U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: September 12, 1994.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, Region I.
[FR Doc. 94-23350 Filed 9-20-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P