[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-22602]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: September 13, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

 

KRT Drywall/Acoustical, a/k/a Construction Associates, Debarment

AGENCY: Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of Debarment, KRT Drywall/Acoustical, a/k/a Construction 
Associates, Logan, Utah.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises of the debarment of KRT Drywall/
Acoustical, a/k/a Construction Associates, (hereafter ``KRT''), as an 
eligible bidder on Government contracts and subcontracts and federally 
assisted construction contracts and subcontracts. The debarment is 
effective immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annie Blackwell, Director Program 
Policy, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, U.S. Department 
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room C-3325, Washington, DC 
20210 (202-219-9430).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 41 CFR 60-30.32(c), the 
Administrative Law Judge issued an Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion 
for a Default Judgment and Entry of Sanctions: (1) finding KRT in 
violation of Executive Orders No. 11246, 11375 and 12086; (2) 
cancelling all Federal contracts and subcontracts and all federally 
assisted construction contracts and subcontracts of KRT, and of its 
officers, agents, servants, employees, successors (including 
Construction Associates), divisions or subsidiaries, and those persons 
in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice 
of the order by personal service or otherwise; declaring KRT ineligible 
for extensions or other modifications of any existing Government 
contracts or subcontracts; and declaring KRT and its officers, agents, 
servants, employees, successors (including Construction Associates), 
divisions or subsidiaries, and those persons in active concert or 
participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by 
personal service or otherwise ineligible for the award of any 
Government contracts or subcontracts and all federally assisted 
contracts and subcontracts, for a period of at least 210 days and 
thereafter, until KRT demonstrates to the Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Federal Contract Compliance Programs that it is currently in 
compliance with the provisions of Executive Orders No. 11246, 11375 and 
12086 and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and that it has 
undertaken to correct past acts of noncompliance, including identifying 
and making whole any victims of its noncompliance, and that it will 
carry out employment practices in compliance with the Executive Orders 
No. 11246, 11375 and 12086. A copy of the Order is attached.

    Signed: September 7, 1994, Washington, D.C.
Shirley J. Wilcher,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance Programs.

Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for a Default Judgment and Entry of 
Sanctions

Date: August 18, 1994.

Case No. 94-OFC-14

    In the Matter of: United States Department of Labor, Office of 
Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Plaintiff v. KRT Drywall/
Acoustical, Defendant.


    It appears that:
    1. Plaintiff U.S. Department of Labor filed the complaint herein on 
July 13, 1994 pursuant to the expedited hearing procedures set forth in 
41 CFR 60-30.31 et seq. A copy of the complaint is attached hereto and 
is incorporated herein by this reference.
    2. The complaint and Plaintiff's Request for Admissions were served 
on Defendant KRT Drywall/Acoustical by Federal Express and were 
received by KRT on July 13, 1994.
    3. KRT did not file an answer, nor has it requested an extension of 
time within which to file an answer.
    4. On August 9, 1994 Plaintiff filed a ``Motion for Default 
Judgment and Entry of Sanctions'' on the grounds that Defendant failed 
to file an answer or request an extension of time within 20 days after 
service of the complaint as required by 41 CFR 60-30.6(a).
    5. On August 10, 1994 Defendant filed an ``Objection to Plaintiff's 
Motion For a Default Judgment and Entry of Sanctions'' requesting a 
denial of the Plaintiff's default motion on the grounds that the 
complaint ``may have been misplaced,'' and that therefore entry of 
default ``will work an injustice upon KRT.''
    6. On August 15, 1994 Plaintiff filed its response to Defendant's 
objection contending that the provisions of 41 CFR 60.32(c) are 
mandatory.
    41 CFR 60.30.32(c) provides that if a hearing is not requested 
within 25 days of the filing of the complaint, the allegations of the 
complaint shall be adopted as findings, and the sanctions and/or 
penalties sought in the complaint shall be imposed. It appears that the 
above provisions of 41 CFR 60.30.32(c) are mandatory and not 
discretionary.
    Since Defendant has neither filed an answer nor asked for an 
extension of time within which to answer, and has to date not requested 
a hearing in any other way, Plaintiff's Motion for Default is granted 
and Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which 
are attached and incorporated herein by this reference, are adopted as 
the findings herein.
    It is therefore ordered that all of KRT's Federal contracts and 
subcontracts are immediately canceled; and that KRT or Construction 
Associates, its officers, agents, subsidiaries, and successors 
(including Construction Associates), are declared ineligible to receive 
any Government contracts or subcontracts or for extensions or other 
modifications of any existing Government contracts or subcontracts, for 
a period of at least 210 days, and thereafter until KRT has 
demonstrated to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract 
Compliance Programs that it is currently in compliance with the 
provisions of the Executive Orders No. 11246, 11375 and 12086 and the 
regulations promulgated thereunder, and that it has undertaken to 
correct past acts of noncompliance, including identifying and making 
whole any victims of its past noncompliance, and that it will carry out 
employment practices in compliance with the Executive Orders No. 11246, 
11375 and 12086.
Alexander Karst,
Administrative Law Judge.
San Francisco, CA.

Administrative Complaint

    Pursuant to 41 CFR 60-30.5 and 41 CFR 60-30.32, Plaintiff, Office 
of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, United States Department of 
Labor (hereinafter ``OFCCP''), by it attorneys, hereby files this 
Administrative Complaint. The hearing, if requested, will be subject to 
the expedited hearing procedures at 41 CFR 60-30.31, et seq. OFCCP 
alleges the following:
    1. This action is brought by OFCCP to enforce the contractual 
obligations imposed by Executive Order No. 11246 (30 Fed. Reg. 12319), 
as amended by Executive Order No. 11375 (32 Fed. Reg. 14303) and 
Executive Order 12086 (43 Fed. Reg. 46501) (hereinafter ``the Executive 
Order'') and the rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto.
    2. Jurisdiction exists under Sections 208 and 301 of the Executive 
Order and the following regulations: 41 CFR 60-1.34, 41 CFR 60-1.26 and 
41 CFR 60-4.8 and 41 CFR Part 60-30.
    3. KRT Drywall/Acoustical (hereinafter ``Defendant'') is a 
construction contractor specializing in drywall work.
    4. At all times pertinent hereto Defendant has maintained its 
principal place of business in Logan, Utah.
    5. At all times pertinent hereto Defendant has held a Federal or 
federally assisted construction contract of $10,000 or more.
    6. At all times pertinent hereto Defendant has been a Government 
contractor, subcontractor or federally assisted construction contractor 
within the meaning of the Executive Order and at all pertinent times 
has been subject to the contractual obligations imposed on Government 
contractors and subcontractors by the Executive Order and the 
implementing regulations issued thereunder.
    7. At all times pertinent hereto Defendant has been required to 
abide by the affirmative action requirements set forth in 41 CFR Part 
60-4.
    8. On May 12, 1992, OFCCP commenced a compliance review of 
Defendant. That review resulted in a Notice of Violation issued on May 
26, 1992, finding that Defendant had violated its affirmative action 
obligations in six specific respects.
    9. On June 26, 1992, OFCCP and Defendant entered into a 
Conciliation Agreement resolving the deficiencies identified in the May 
26, 1992 Notice of Violation.
    10. Defendant agreed in the Conciliation Agreement to provide OFCCP 
with personnel activity reports at six month intervals. The reports 
were to include information on the number of vacancies for each craft, 
the number of contacts KRT had with linkage and recruitment sources to 
fill those vacancies, the number of applications received by KRT from 
each of its recruitment sources, the number of hires, and the total 
number of applicants and hires by race, sex and ethnicity.
    11. The Conciliation Agreement was to remain in full force and 
effect until OFCCP determined that Defendant had submitted two 
acceptable reports as defined by the Agreement.
    12. Defendant agreed in the Conciliation Agreement to notify 
certain employment and recruitment organizations when job vacancies 
arose and to seek referrals from those organizations. The organizations 
to be contacted included the Turning Point Program, the Indian 
Employment Service and the Utah State Job Service.
    13. The first personnel activity summary report was due on November 
10, 1992, and was to cover the period of May 1, through October 31, 
1992.
    14. Defendant submitted a report on November 30, 1992, which stated 
that the company had hired 10 male applicants in the last six months.
    15. Defendant did not notify the Indian Employment Service or the 
Turning Point Program of these 10 openings and did not request that 
these sources supply applicants for any of these positions, as agreed 
upon their conciliation agreement.
    16. Defendant's first personnel activity report was not timely 
submitted.
    17. Defendant did not specifically request qualified female and 
minority applicants when it listed job openings with Job Service.
    18. Defendant did not, during the period May 1, through October 31, 
1992 make every good effort to recruit and employ women.
    19. By letter dated February 4, 1993, OFCCP notified Defendant that 
its untimely filing of the first personnel activity report, its failure 
to specifically request affirmative action job orders when it contacted 
the Job Service, and its failure to make every good faith effort to 
recruit and employ women during the period from May 1, through October 
31, 1992, violated the June 16, 1992, Conciliation Agreement.
    20. Defendant's second personnel activity report was due on May 10, 
1993, and was to cover the period from November 1, 1992, through April 
30, 1993.
    21. On May 7, 1993, Defendant filed with OFCCP a letter stating 
that there had been no hiring activity, and hence no contact with 
linkage or recruitment sources during the period covered by the second 
report.
    22. OFCCP contacted and visited KRT during June and July 1993 in an 
effort to confirm Defendant's representation that there had been no 
hiring activity during the six months preceding the May 7, 1993, 
letter.
    23. The letter submitted by Defendant to OFCCP on May 7, 1993, 
misstated defendant's hiring activity during the preceding six months.
    24. During the period from November 1, 1992, through April 30, 
1993, Defendant failed to maintain personnel records including hire 
dates, termination dates and applicant information as required by the 
June 16, 1992, Conciliation Agreement.
    25. Defendant hired a number of individuals during the period from 
November 1, 1992, through April 30, 1993.
    26. Defendant did not contact the linkage organizations agencies 
regarding vacancies filled during the period from November 1, 1992, 
through March 30, 1993, and did not request those sources to supply 
applicants for any of these positions.
    27. The acts and practices described in paragraphs 16 through 18, 
above, breached the June 16, 1992, Conciliation Agreement Defendant 
entered into with OFCCP.
    28. The acts and practices described in paragraphs 23 through 26, 
above, breached the June 16, 1992, Conciliation Agreement Defendant 
entered into with OFCCP.
    29. The acts and practices described in paragraphs 16 through 18 
and 23 through 26, above, violate Executive Order 11246, and the 
regulations promulgated thereunder, and therefore violate KRT Drywall/
Acoustical's contractual obligations to the Federal Government.
    30. Plaintiff notified Defendant of its determination that the 
company had violated its obligations under the Conciliation Agreement. 
Defendant has not demonstrated that it did abide by the terms of the 
Conciliation Agreement and so, pursuant to 41 CFR 60-1.34(a), 
enforcement proceedings may be initiated immediately.
    31. KRT failed to contact the linkage organizations referenced in 
the June 16, 1992, Conciliation Agreement; consequently, Defendant may 
have failed to consider for employment qualified individuals registered 
with these organizations.
    32. Unless retrained by an Administrative Order, KRT Drywall/
Acoustical will continue to violate the obligations imposed upon it by 
the Executive Order and the rules and regulations issued pursuant 
thereto.
    Wherefore, plaintiff prays for a decision and order pursuant to 
Section 209 of the Executive Order, 41 CFR 60-1.26 and 41 CFR Part 60-
30, permanently enjoining Defendant, and its officers, agents, 
servants, employees, successors, divisions and subsidiaries and those 
persons in active concert or participation with it from violating the 
Executive Order.
    Plaintiff further prays for a decision and order debarring 
Defendant and its officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, 
divisions and subsidiaries and those persons in active concert or 
participation with it, from entering into future Government contracts, 
subcontractors or federally assisted construction contracts until such 
time as Defendant satisfies the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal 
Contract Compliance Programs that it has undertaken to correct past 
acts of noncompliance and that it is currently in compliance with the 
provisions of the Executive Order and the regulations promulgated 
thereunder, but in no event less than 210 days.
    Plaintiff further prays for a decision and order canceling any 
contracts Defendant may hold by the time a final order is issued.
    Plaintiff further prays for such other relief as justice may 
require.

      Respectfully submitted,
Thomas S. Williamson, Jr.,
Solicitor of Labor.
James D. Henry,
Associate Solicitor.
Debra A. Millenson,
Senior Trial Attorney.
L. Denise Galambos,
Attorney.

Certificate of Service

    I hereby certify that on this 12th day of July 1994, the foregoing 
Administrative Complaint has been served upon Kenneth R. Thigpen, 
President of KRT Drywall/Acoustical, by Federal Express, postage 
prepaid, at the following address: 1375 West 200 North, Logan, Utah 
84321.
Sonya Boyd,
Legal Technician.

Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law\1\

    Plaintiff Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs 
(``OFCCP'') filed this action on July 12, 1994. As is set forth more 
fully in OFCCP's Motion for a Default Judgment and Entry of Sanctions 
filed this date, defendant KRT Drywall/Acoustical a/k/a Construction 
Associates (hereinafter ``KRT'') failed to answer the Administrative 
Complaint or to request a hearing within the period provided by the 
applicable regulations. 41 CFR 60-30.6 and 60-30.32. The Administrative 
Law Judge therefore is required to enter a default judgment against 
KRT. 41 CFR 60-30.32(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\All the statements contained in this document have been drawn 
from the Administrative Complaint and OFCCP's Requests for 
Admission. Because KRT failed to answer the Requests for Admission, 
they should be deemed admitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OFCCP proposes that the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions 
of Law be included in the Order of Judgment issued in this case.

I. Findings of Fact

    1. KRT Drywall/Acoustical (``KRT'') is a construction contractor 
specializing in drywall work.
    2. At all times pertinent hereto KRT has held a federal or 
federally assisted construction contract or subcontract of $10,000 or 
more.
    3. On May 12, 1992, OFCCP commenced a compliance review of KRT.
    4. On May 26, 1992, OFCCP issued to KRT a Notice of Violation 
finding that KRT had violated its affirmative action obligations in six 
specific respects and was not in compliance with the requirements of 
Executive Order 11246.
    5. On June 16, 1992, OFCCP and KRT entered into a Conciliation 
Agreement resolving the deficiencies identified in the May 26, 1992 
Notice of Violation.
    6. KRT agreed in the Conciliation Agreement to provide OFCCP with 
personnel activity reports at six month intervals. These reports were 
to include information for the relevant six-month period on the number 
of vacancies for each craft, the number of contacts KRT had with 
linkage and recruitment sources to fill those vacancies, the number of 
applications received by KRT from each of its recruitment sources, the 
number of hires, and the total number of applicants and hires by race, 
sex and ethnicity.
    7. The Conciliation Agreement was to remain in full force and 
effect until OFCCP determined that KRT had submitted two acceptable 
reports as defined by the Agreement.
    8. KRT agreed in the Conciliation Agreement to notify certain 
employment and recruitment organizations when job vacancies arose and 
to seek referrals from those organizations. The organizations to be 
contacted included the Turning Point Program, the Indian Employment 
Service and the Utah State Job Service.
    9. The first personnel activity summary report was due to OFCCP on 
November 10, 1992, and was to cover the period of May 1, through 
October 31, 1992.
    10. On November 30, 1992, KRT submitted a report which stated that 
the company had hired 10 male applicants in the six month period 
covered by the report.
    11. KRT's first personnel activity report was not timely submitted.
    12. KRT did not notify the Indian Employment Service or the Turning 
Point Program of these 10 openings and did not request that these 
sources supply applicants for any of these positions, as agreed upon in 
their conciliation agreement.
    13. KRT did not specifically request qualified female and minority 
applicants when it listed job openings with Job Service.
    14. KRT did not, during the period May 1, through October 31, 1992 
make every good effort to recruit and employ women.
    15. On February 4, 1993, OFCCP notified KRT that its untimely 
filing of the first personnel activity report, its failure to 
specifically request affirmative action job orders when it contacted 
the Job Service, and its failure to make every good faith effort to 
recruit and employ women during the period from May 1, through October 
31, 1992, violated the June 16, 1992, Conciliation Agreement.
    16. KRT's second personnel activity report was due on May 10, 1993, 
and was to cover the period from November 1, 1992, through April 30, 
1993.
    17. On May 7, 1993, KRT filed with OFCCP a letter stating that 
there had been no hiring activity, and hence no contact with linkage or 
recruitment sources, during the period covered by the second report.
    18. OFCCP contacted and visited KRT during June and July 1993 in an 
effort to confirm KRT's representation that there had been no hiring 
activity during the six months preceding the May 7, 1993, letter.
    19. KRT's letter to OFCCP of May 7, 1993, misstated KRT's hiring 
activity during the preceding six months.
    20. During the period from November 1, 1992, through April 30, 
1993, KRT failed to maintain personnel records including hire dates, 
termination dates and applicant information as required by the June 16, 
1992, Conciliation Agreement.
    21. KRT hired at least twenty seven individuals during the period 
from November 1, 1992, through April 30, 1993.
    22. KRT did not contact the linkage organizations agencies 
regarding vacancies filled during the period from November 1, 1992, 
through March 30, 1993, and did not request those sources to supply 
applicants for any of these positions.
    23. On September 14, 1993, OFCCP notified KRT of its determination 
that the company had violated its obligations under the Conciliation 
Agreement. OFCCP provided KRT 15 days in which to respond.
    24. KRT failed to demonstrate within the 15-day period that it did 
abide by the terms of the Conciliation Agreement.
    25. On July 12, 1994, OFCCP filed an Administrative Complaint in 
this matter and served upon KRT Requests for Admission.
    26. To date, KRT has not answered either the Administrative 
Complaint or the Requests for Admission.

II. Conclusions of Law

    1. The Office of Administrative Law Judges has jurisdiction over 
this matter pursuant to Sections 201, 208, and 209 of Executive Order 
11246, and 41 CFR 60-1.26 and 41 CFR Part 60-30 of the Secretary of 
Labor's implementing regulations, and is empowered to issue a final 
order determining whether KRT is in current violation of its 
obligations under the Executive Order and its implementing regulations 
and to recommend appropriate remedies and sanctions. 41 CFR 60-
30.32(c).
    2. KRT is a Government contractor, subcontractor or Federally 
assisted construction contractor within the meaning of the Executive 
Order. At all material times KRT has been subject to the contractual 
obligations imposed on Government contractors and subcontractors by the 
Executive Order, and the implementing regulations issued thereunder.
    3. At all material times, KRT has been required to abide by the 
affirmative action requirements set forth in 41 CFR Part 60-4.
    4. KRT breached its obligations under the Conciliation Agreement 
entered into on June 16, 1992.
    5. KRT's actions as described in the Findings of Fact, above, 
violate Executive Order 11246, and the regulations promulgated 
thereunder.
    6. The Executive Order, and its implementing regulations authorize 
sanctions, including contract cancellation and debarment. See, Section 
209 of the Executive Order.
    7. Sanctions are appropriate when, as here, a contractor has failed 
to abide by the terms of a conciliation agreement, and is in violation 
of the Executive Order.
    8. Under the applicable regulation where, as here, a defendant 
fails to answer an administrative complaint or to request a hearing 
within 20 days of service of that complaint, its right to a hearing 
shall be deemed waived and the Administrative Law Judge shall order the 
sanctions and remedies sought in the administrative complaint. 41 CFR 
60-30.32(c).
    9. For these reasons, I order that all of KRT's Federal contracts 
and subcontracts immediately be canceled and that KRT or Construction 
Associates, its officers, agents, subsidiaries, and successors 
(including Construction Associates), be declared ineligible to receive 
any Government contracts or subcontracts or for extensions or other 
modifications of any existing Government contracts or subcontracts, for 
a period of at least 210 days, and thereafter until KRT has 
demonstrated to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract 
Compliance Programs that it is currently in compliance with the 
provisions of the Executive Order and the regulations promulgated 
thereunder, and that it has undertaken to correct past acts of 
noncompliance, including identifying and making whole any victims of 
its past noncompliance, and that it will carry out employment practices 
in compliance with the Executive Order.

III. Conclusion

    OFCCP requests that these proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions 
of Law be adopted by the Administrative Law Judge.

      Respectfully Submitted,
Thomas S. Williamson, Jr.,
Solicitor of Labor.
James D. Henry,
Associate Solicitor.
Debra A. Millenson,
Senior Trial Attorney.
L. Denise Galambos,
Attorney.

Certificate of Service

    I hereby certify that on this 8th day of August, 1994 the foregoing 
Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law have been 
served upon Aaron Milligan, Chief Executive Officer of KRT Drywall/
Acoustical, by Federal Express, postage prepaid, at the following 
address: 1375 West 200 North, Logan, Utah 84321.
Sonya Boyd,
Legal Technician.

Service Sheet

Case Name: KRT Drywall/Acoustical
Case Number: 94-OFC-14
Title of Document: Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for a Default 
Judgment and Entry of Sanctions

    A copy of the above document was sent to the following:

Kenneth R. Thigpen, President, KRT Drywall/Acoustical, Attn: Sonya 
Boyd, 1375 West 200 North, Logan, Utah 84321
Karen Diddens, Compliance Office, U.S. Department of Labor, 10 West 
Broadway, Suite 305, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
T.A. Housh, Jr., Regional Solicitor, Region VII, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 911 Walnut St., 21st Floor, Kansas City, MO 64106
Thomas S. Williamson, Jr., Solicitor of Labor, Attn: L. Denise 
Galambos, Esq., Office of the Solicitor/USDOL, Room S-2002, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
Director, Office of Admin. Appeals, Department of Labor, Room S-4309, 
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, P194-427-378
Civil Rights Division, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Room N-2464, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
Special Counsel to the Assistant Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment & Training Admin., Room N-4671, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Room C-3325, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210

Millie Janey,
Reporter.
    Dated: August 18, 1994.
[FR Doc. 94-22602 Filed 9-12-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-27-M