[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-22526]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: September 13, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[OH57-2-6367; FRL-5054-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio
AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USEPA is partially approving and partially disapproving a
requested revision to the Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) for sources
within specified source categories that require continuous emissions
monitoring (CEM) and reporting. The revision request consists of CEM
requirements contained in operating permits. USEPA is disapproving the
CEM requirements contained in expired permits and approving the CEM
requirements that are contained in unexpired permits. Additionally,
there are no NOx sources in the specified category. Therefore,
USEPA is also approving Ohio's negative declaration for NOx
sources.
USEPA's action is based upon a revision request which was submitted
by the State to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule becomes effective on October 13, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the SIP revision request, public comments on the
rulemaking and other materials relating to this rulemaking are
available for inspection at the following address: (It is recommended
that you telephone Maggie Greene, at (312) 886-6088, before visiting
the Region 5 Office.) United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (AE-
17J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.
A copy of this requested revision to the Ohio SIP is also available
for inspection at the following address: Office of Air and Radiation
(OAR), Docket and Information Center (Air Docket 6102), room M1500,
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Greene, Air Enforcement Branch,
Regulation Development Section (AE-17J), United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6088.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of State Submittal
On January 5, 1987, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA)
submitted to the USEPA a request for a revision to the Ohio SIP for
particulate matter and nitrogen oxides for sources within specified
source categories that require continuous emissions monitoring (CEM)
and reporting. The revision request consisted of CEM requirements
contained in operating permits for 116 associated sources at 37
facilities.
The revision was submitted to satisfy the requirements of section
110(a)(2)(F)(i), (ii) and (iii) of the Clean Air Act and the specific
provisions described in 40 CFR part 51, appendix P. Section
110(a)(2)(F) provides that the SIP must require the installation of
equipment to monitor emissions from stationary sources, periodic
reporting of such emissions and correlation of such reports with any
emission limitations established in the SIP for source categories
identified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix P.
The source categories and the respective monitoring requirements
identified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix P are listed below:
1. Fossil fuel-fired steam generators. This category shall be
monitored for opacity, nitrogen oxide emissions, sulfur dioxide
emissions, and oxygen or carbon dioxide.
2. Fluid bed catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators. This
category shall be monitored for opacity.
3. Sulfuric acid plants. This category shall be monitored for sulfur
dioxide emissions.
4. Nitric acid plants with greater than 300 tons per day production
capacity shall be monitored for nitrogen oxide emissions.
On March 11, 1994, the USEPA published a rulemaking action in the
Federal Register (59 FR 11569) proposing to disapprove the requested
revision because the CEM requirements were contained in expired permits
and were no longer enforceable. USEPA stated in the proposed rulemaking
action that if the OEPA submitted up-to-date permits containing
approvable CEM requirements for the facilities covered by the revision,
USEPA would approve the revision request through the effective dates of
such permits.
On April 11, 1994, the OEPA submitted a new revision request to
USEPA in response to the March 11, 1994 proposed rulemaking, along with
its comments on the rulemaking. Comments were also received from Dayton
Power and Light Company (DP&L), and Fuller & Henry on behalf of the
Environmental Committee of the Ohio Electric Utility Institute and the
following member companies: Buckeye Power, Inc., Columbus Southern
Power Company, Dayton Power and Light Company, Ohio Edison Company,
Ohio Power Company, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, The Cleveland
Electric Illuminating Company, The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company,
and The Toledo Edison Company (Ohio Utilities).
II. Public Comments and USEPA Responses
USEPA's evaluation of the comments is summarized below.
OEPA Comment: On May 5, 1987, USEPA approved Ohio EPA's SIP
revision based on permits to operate which incorporated the appendix P
sulfur dioxide monitoring requirements for Coulton Chemical Plant in
Toledo, Ohio and the E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company facility in
Miami, Ohio that were issued on January 3, and March 25, 1986,
respectively.
USEPA Response: This rulemaking action involves CEM requirements
for particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions. As stated in the
proposed rulemaking action, this revision request does not apply to the
monitoring of sulfur dioxide emissions at fossil fuel-fired steam
generators and sulfuric acid plants. The sulfur dioxide CEM
requirements for the above facilities were discussed in a separate
Federal Register rulemaking (54 FR 1693), dated January 17, 1989.
OEPA Comment: Failure on the part of USEPA to act on the opacity
monitoring provisions of the SIP in a timely manner has adversely
affected the State since it is required to resubmit additional
documentation and be subject to changes in USEPA policy.
USEPA Response: This Agency is limited to taking action on the
revision request that has been formally submitted to it, and has no
choice except to disapprove CEM, recording, and reporting requirements
contained in unenforceable expired permits.
OEPA Comment: As late as April 8, 1994, Ohio EPA staff has been
told that even if OEPA filed the required information in accordance
with the March 11, 1994 Federal Register, the SIP submittal may not be
approvable.
USEPA Response: This comment seems to be the result of a
misconception on the part of OEPA. USEPA stated in the March 11, 1994
Federal Register that if the OEPA submitted up-to-date permits,
containing approvable CEM requirements, the USEPA would then approve
the revision request in the final rulemaking action. In an April 5,
1994, discussion regarding furnishing OEPA example CEM rule language,
it was mentioned that USEPA was exploring the possibility of
conditionally approving the SIP revision request in the final action.
It was further stated that conditionally approving the revision might
not be possible and the issue would be discussed further with OEPA. No
statement was made that the revision might not be approved if up-to-
date permits were submitted to USEPA.
Ohio Utilities Comment: The Ohio Utilities' stated concern with
USEPA's proposed disapproval action is OEPA's proposed incorporation of
the CEM program into Ohio's SIP on a permit-by-permit basis. This
method of adopting approvable CEM requirements creates an unnecessary
burden on Ohio EPA and the regulated community, fails to recognize the
flexibility needed to operate a successful CEM program, and does not
allow for due process as in the case of rulemaking. USEPA should
instead require Ohio EPA to go through rulemaking procedures and adopt
40 CFR part 51, appendix P to satisfy CEM requirements.
The Ohio Utilities also expressed concern that permit specific CEM
requirements place unnecessary burdens on OEPA and the regulated
community and that there is little or no opportunity for public
comment.
USEPA Response: The USEPA has requested that the OEPA go through
rulemaking procedures and adopt the CEM requirements in 40 CFR part 51,
appendix P by revising language in existing Ohio Administrative Code
rules or by adopting new rules. OEPA's promulgation of rules will
resolve the problems associated with incorporating the CEM requirements
into the SIP on a permit-by-permit basis. The rules would require that
all sources in a category listed in 40 CFR part 51, appendix P install,
calibrate, maintain and operate equipment for continuously monitoring,
recording and reporting emissions in accordance with appendix P's
minimum monitoring requirements. Section 119.03 of the Ohio Revised
Code requires OEPA to provide public notice and hold a public hearing
when rules are adopted, amended or rescinded. Written or oral comments
may be presented at the public hearing. The rules would then be
submitted to the USEPA as a SIP revision request. Thus, all interested
parties would have an opportunity to comment before the revision to the
SIP becomes final.
Ohio Utilities Comment: The Ohio Utilities expressed concern about
the fact that circumstances at a facility may change requiring a change
in the CEM monitoring requirements and the facility would have to
follow existing permit requirements, even though inapplicable, until
OEPA revises the SIP. Additionally, Ohio Utilities expressed concern
that the OEPA may have erroneously incorporated CEM requirements into
permits for sources not covered by appendix P.
USEPA Response: The USEPA understands the concerns of the Ohio
Utilities. Instead of incorporating CEM requirements on a permit-by-
permit basis, USEPA has requested that the OEPA revise existing rules
or adopt new rules to incorporate the CEM requirements, for specified
source categories, into the Ohio SIP. Any revised rules adopted by the
State to establish its CEM program must meet all of the requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(F)(i), (ii) and (iii) of the Clean Air Act and the
specific provisions contained in 40 CFR part 51, appendix P. As to the
point regarding erroneous incorporation of CEM requirements into
permits, it is not clear to USEPA which sources are being referred to
by the Ohio Utilities. However, before the new rules are incorporated
in the Ohio SIP, the regulated community will be given an opportunity
to comment regarding the appropriateness of CEM requirements being
applied to sources. Also, see USEPA's response below that addresses
concerns about CEM requirements for two facilities. Adherence to the
State and the Federal administrative procedure acts will ensure that
the regulated community is afforded the due process associated with
rulemaking actions. The CEM requirements being approved by this
rulemaking action will be effective through the expiration date of the
permits.
Dayton Power and Light Company (DP&L) Comment: DP&L objects to
USEPA including and/or identifying DP&L's Longworth andHutchings
Stations as being required to comply with the requirements of appendix
P.
USEPA Response: The OEPA submitted a SIP revision request,
consisting of Permits to Operate to USEPA on January 5, 1987, and
requested that USEPA rulemake only on those portions of the permits
pertaining to the CEM requirements. The Longworth Station, Application
No. 0857040016 B004, was identified in OEPA's January 5, 1987,
submittal as a fossil fuel-fired steam generator with greater than 250
million BTU per hour heat input that requires CEM. The Permit to
Operate for Longworth Station, Application Number 0857040016 B004 in
OEPA's April 11, 1994, revised submittal does not contain CEM
requirements, but instead provides for visible emission readings.
Therefore, USEPA is not rulemaking on the Longworth Station Permit to
Operate.
DP&L Comment: DP&L's Hutchings Station has demonstrated to the
State that it has an annual average capacity factor of less than 30
percent for its boilers and, pursuant to 40 CFR part 51, appendix P,
paragraph 2.1 is not subject to CEM requirements. Because of the low
annual average capacity factor, neither Ohio EPA nor the Regional Air
Pollution Control Agency have required Hutchings Station to install
opacity monitors.
USEPA Response: 40 CFR part 51, appendix P, paragraph 2.1 requires
CEM for fossil fuel-fired steam generators with an annual average
capacity factor of greater than 30 percent as reported to the Federal
Power Commission, or as otherwise demonstrated to the State by the
owner or operator. The Special Terms and Conditions contained in the
Permits to Operate submitted to USEPA by OEPA on April 11, 1994 for
DP&L, Hutchings Station, Application Numbers 0857780013 B001 through
0857780013 B006, require that Hutchings Station undergo an annual
review to determine if continuous opacity monitors must be installed.
As requested by OEPA, USEPA is rulemaking only on the portions of the
permits that contain CEM requirements. Therefore, USEPA is not
rulemaking on the DP&L, Hutchings Station, Permits to Operate.
DP&L Comment: DP&L expressed its concern about the CEM requirements
being approved only through the effective dates of the permits and
about the fact that the OEPA has not adopted rules to incorporate the
CEM program requirements into the Ohio SIP.
USEPA Response: As stated previously in USEPA's response to the
Ohio Utilities comment, USEPA has requested that OEPA adopt new or
revised rules for incorporating the CEM requirements of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix P into the Ohio SIP. As to the limited duration of the
approval, CEM plans are required by 40 CFR 51.214 to contain legally
enforceable procedures for requiring stationary sources listed in 40
CFR part 51, appendix P, to install and operate CEM equipment. In this
instance, USEPA can only approve the CEM requirements through the
effective date of the permits, because expired permits are not legally
enforceable and would, therefore, not meet the requirements of 40 CFR
part 52, appendix P.
III. Rulemaking Action
USEPA is approving the CEM requirements through the expiration
dates of the up-to-date Permits to Operate and disapproving the CEM
requirements as to permits that have expired. CEM recording and
reporting requirements are approved for sources at the following
facilities:
Cincinnati Gas and Electric (CG&E) Company-W. C. Beckjord Station
CG&E Miami Fort Station
Cleveland Electric Illuminating (CEI) Company (Centerior Energy)
Ashtabula Plant ``C''
CEI Lakeshore Plant
Columbus Southern Power Company (CSPC)-Conesville Station
Dayton Power and Light (DP&L) Company-J. M. Stuart Station
Ohio Edison (OE), R.E. Burger Plant
OE Toronto Plant
OE W. H. Sammis Plant
OE Edgewater Station
Ohio Power (OP) Company-Gavin Plant
OP Cardinal Operating Company
OP Buckeye Power, Inc.
OP Muskingum River Plant
Orrville Municipal Power Plant
Piqua Municipal Power Plant
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc.
Procter and Gamble Company
Champion International, Hamilton Mill
British Petroleum Oil Company-Toledo Refinery
Ashland Petroleum
Nitric acid plants of greater than 300 tons per day production
capacity must be monitored for nitrogen oxides. The State of Ohio does
not have any nitric acid plants that exceed the 300 ton per day
production capacity. Therefore, USEPA is approving the State of Ohio's
negative declaration for nitrogen oxide emissions at applicable nitric
acid plants.
USEPA is disapproving the CEM requirements contained in expired
permits for the following sources:
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, W. C. Beckjord Station,
Application Nos. 1413100008 B001 and 1413100008 B04.
Cleveland Electric Illuminating (CEI) Company, Ashtabula,
Application Nos. 0204000211 B002 and 0204000211 B004.
CEI Ashtabula A and B Plant, Application No. 0204010000 B008.
CEI Avon Lake Plant, Application Nos. 0247030013 B010 through
0247030013 B012, and Application No. 02470300013 B014.
CEI Eastlake Plant, Application Nos. 0243160009 B001 through
0243160009 B005.
Columbus Southern Power, Picway Station, Application No. 0165000006
B004.
Ohio Edison, Niles Station, Application Nos. 0278060023 B001 and
0278060023 B002.
Ohio Edison, W. H. Sammis Plant, Application No. 1741160017 B011 and
1741160017 B012.
Mead Corporation, Application Nos. 0671010028B001 B001 through
0671010028 B003.
Toledo Edison (TE) Company, Acme Station, Application Nos.
0448010086 B005 through 0448010086 B010.
TE, Bay Shore Station, Application Nos. 0448020006 B001 through
0448020006 B004.
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., Application No. 0684020038
B004.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Application Nos. 1677010192 B001 and
1677010192 B002.
Procter and Gamble Company, Application No. 1431390903 B021.
Champion Intenational, Hamilton Mill-Champion Papers, Application
No. 1409040212 B020.
British Petroleum Oil Company, Lima Refinery, Application No.
0302020012 P010.
Hamilton Municipal Elecric Plant, Application No. 1409040243 B008.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing
or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any
SIP. USEPA shall consider each request for revision to the SIP in light
of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in
relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
This action has been classified as a Table 2 action by the Regional
Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on
January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an October 4, 1993,
memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. A future document will inform the general public of
these tables. On January 6, 1989, the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) waived Table 2 and Table 3 SIP revisions (54 FR 2222) from the
requirements of section 3 of Executive Order 12291 for 2 years. The
USEPA has submitted a request for a permanent waiver for Table 2 and
Table 3 SIP revisions. The OMB has agreed to continue the waiver until
such time as it rules on USEPA's request. This request continues in
effect under Executive Order 12866, which superseded Executive Order
12291 on September 30, 1993. OMB has exempted this regulatory action
from Executive Order 12866 review.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., USEPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604).
Alternatively, USEPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the CAA
do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP-
approval does not impose any new requirements. I certify that it does
not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover,
due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the CAA,
preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The
CAA forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIPS on such grounds.
Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S. Ct. 1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
USEPA's disapproval of a portion of the State request under section
110 and subchapter I, part D of the CAA does not affect any existing
requirements applicable to small entities. Any pre-existing Federal
requirements remain in place after this disapproval. Federal
disapproval of the State submittal does not affect its State-
enforceability. Moreover, USEPA's disapproval of a portion of the
submittal does not impose any new Federal requirements. Therefore,
USEPA certifies that this action does not have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities because it does not remove
existing requirements nor does it impose any new Federal requirements.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 14, 1994. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation
Plan for the State of Ohio was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
Dated: August 8, 1994.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart KK--Ohio
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(88) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(88) On April 11, 1994, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
submitted a request for a revision to the Ohio State Implementation
Plan for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides for specified source
categories that require continuous emissions monitoring, recording, and
reporting.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 1413100008 B002 and 1413100008 B005 for
Cincinnati Gas and Electric (CG&E) Company, W. C. Beckjord Station. The
dates of issuance are July 16, 1992. These permits are approved through
the expiration date of July 15, 1995.
(B) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 1413100008 B003 and 1413100008 B006 for
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, W. C. Beckjord Station. The dates
of issuance are November 13, 1992. These permits are approved through
the expiration date of November 12, 1995.
(C) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 1431350093 B005 and 1431350093 B006 for
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, Miami Fort. The dates of issuance
are September 3, 1993. These permits are approved through the
expiration date of September 1, 1996.
(D) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1431350093 B007 for Cincinnati Gas and
Electric Company, Miami Fort. The date of issuance is November 19,
1993. This permit is approved through the expiration date of November
18, 1996.
(E) Special Terms and Conditions No. 3 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0204000211 B001 and 0204000211 B003 for
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ashtabula Plant ``C''. The
dates of issuance are April 24, 1992. These permits are approved
through the expiration date of April 23, 1995.
(F) Special Terms and Conditions No. 6 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1318000245 B006 for Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company, Lakeshore Plant. The date of issuance is December
7, 1993. This permit is approved through the expiration date of
December 6, 1996.
(G) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0616000000 B004 for Columbus Southern Power
Company, Conesville Station. The date of issuance is December 4, 1992.
This permit is approved through the expiration date of December 3,
1995.
(H) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0616000000 B001 and 0616000000 B002 for
Columbus Southern Power Company, Conesville Station. The dates of
issuance are June 22, 1993. These permits are approved through the
expiration date of June 21, 1996.
(I) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0616000000 B003 for Columbus Southern Power
Company, Conesville Station. The date of issuance is June 29, 1993.
This permit is approved through the expiration date of June 28, 1996.
(J) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0701000007 B001 through 0701000007 B004 for
Dayton Power and Light Company, J. M. Stuart Station. The dates of
issuance are July 6, 1993. These permits are approved through the
expiration date of July 5, 1996.
(K) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1707130015 B005 for Ohio Edison Company, R.
E. Burger Plant. The date of issuance is July 30, 1993. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of July 29, 1996.
(L) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 1707130015 B006 through 1707130015 B008,
and Application Numbers 1707130015 B011 and B012 for Ohio Edison
Company, R. E. Burger Plant. The dates of issuance are August 3, 1993.
These permits are approved through the expiration date of August 2,
1996.
(M) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 1707130015 B009 and 1707130015 B010 for
Ohio Edison Company, R. E. Burger Plant. The dates of issuance are
October 8, 1993. These permits are approved through the expiration date
of October 7, 1996.
(N) Special Terms and Conditions No. 6 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741180018 B001 for Ohio Edison Company,
Toronto Plant. The date of issuance is March 5, 1993. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of March 4, 1996.
(O) Special Terms and Conditions No. 6 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741180018 B001 for Ohio Edison Company,
Toronto Plant. The date of issuance is March 5, 1993. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of March 4, 1996.
(P) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741180018 B002 for Ohio Edison Company,
Toronto Plant. The date of issuance is October 15, 1993. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of October 24, 1996.
(Q) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741180018 B003 for Ohio Edison Company,
Toronto Plant. The date of issuance is November 23, 1992. This permit
is approved through the expiration date of November 22, 1995.
(R) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 1741160017 B007 and B008, 1741160017 B010
and 1741160017 B013 for Ohio Edison Company, Sammis Plant. The dates of
issuance are March 10, 1993. These permits are approved through the
expiration date of March 9, 1996.
(S) Special Terms and Conditions No. 3 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741160017 B009 for Ohio Edison Company,
Sammis Plant. The date of issuance is June 25, 1993. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of June 24, 1996.
(T) Special Terms and Conditions No. 6 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0247080049 B003 for Ohio Edison Company,
Edgewater Plant. The date of issuance is February 25, 1994. This permit
is approved through the expiration date of February 25, 1997.
(U) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0627010056 B003 and 0627010056 B004 for
Ohio Power Company, General James M. Gavin Plant. Thes date of issuance
are May 2, 1992. These permits are approved through the expiration date
of April 30, 1995.
(V) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741050002 B001 for Ohio Power Company,
Cardinal Operating Company. The date of issuance is March 30, 1993.
This permit is approved through the expiration date of March 29, 1996.
(W) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741050002 B002 for Ohio Power Company,
Cardinal Operating Company. The date of issuance is November 12, 1993.
This permit is approved through the expiration date of November 11,
1996.
(X) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1741050129 B002 for Ohio Power Company,
Buckeye Power, Inc. The date of issuance is October 10, 1992. This
permit is approved through the expiration date of October 19, 1995.
(Y) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0684000000 B002, 0684000000 B003,
0684000000 B004, and 0684000000 B005 for Ohio Power Company, Muskingum
River Plant. The dates of issuance are May 12, 1993. These permits are
approved through the expiration date of May 11, 1996.
(Z) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0684000000 B006 for Ohio Power Company,
Muskingum River Plant. The date of issuance is April 20, 1993. This
permit is approved through the expiration date of April 19, 1996.
(AA) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0285010188 B001 for Orrville Municipal Power
Plant. The date of issuance is November 13, 1991. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of November 14, 1994.
(BB) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 028501018 B004 for Orrville Muniticpal Power
Plant. The date of issuance is January 22, 1993. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of January 21, 1996.
(CC) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0855100041 B001 and 0855100041 B002 for
Piqua Municipal Power Plant. The dates of issuance are April 10, 1992.
These permits are approved through the expiration date of April 9,
1995.
(DD) Special Terms and Conditions No. 5 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0855100041 B003 for Piqua Municipal Power
Plant. The date of issuance is April 12, 1993. This permit is approved
through the expiration date of April 11, 1996.
(EE) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permits to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Numbers 0684020037 B001 and 0684020037 B003 for
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. The dates of issuance are October
12, 1993. These permits are approved through the expiration date of
October 11, 1996.
(FF) Special Terms and Conditions No. 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 0684020037 B002 for American Municipal
Power-Ohio, Inc. The date of issuance is November 30, 1993. This permit
is approved through the expiration date of November 29, 1996.
(GG) Special Terms and Conditions No. 8 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Application Number 1431390903 B022 for Procter and Gamble
Company. The date of issuance is December 4, 1992. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of December 3, 1995.
(HH) Special Terms and Conditions No. 6 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate Number 1409040212
B010 for Champion International, Hamilton Mill. The date of issuance is
November 8, 1991. This permit is approved through the expiration date
of November 7, 1994.
(II) Special Terms and Conditions Nos. 3 and 4 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate an Air Contaminant
Source, Appplication Number 0448020007 P007 for BP Oil Company-Toledo
Refinery. The date of issuance is March 27, 1992. This permit is
approved through the expiration date of March 26, 1995.
(JJ) Special Terms and Conditions No. 3 of State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Permit to Operate Number an Air
Contaminant Source, Application Number 1576000301 P002 for Ashland
Petroleum Company. The date of issuance is January 21, 1993. This
permit is approved through the expiration date of January 21, 1996.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter dated April 11, 1994 from Donald R. Schregardus,
Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5. The letter states that the public hearing for the SIP
revision which was held on November 13, 1986 included the negative
declaration regarding existing nitric acid plants (Section 2.2 of
Appendix P).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 94-22526 Filed 9-12-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F