[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-19390]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: August 9, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC94-22-000, et al.]

 

Ocean State Power, Ocean State Power II, et al.; Electric Rate 
and Corporate Regulation Filings

August 3, 1994.
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. Ocean State Power Ocean State Power II

[Docket Nos. EC94-22-000 and EL94-82-000]

    Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Ocean State Power (``OSP I'') 
and Ocean State Power II (``OSP II'') filed a Petition with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (the ``Commission'') For an Order 
Disclaiming Jurisdiction Under Section 203 of The Federal Power Act Or, 
In The Alternative, Granting Authorization Pursuant To Section 203 of 
the Federal Power Act over a merger involving J. Makowski Company, Inc. 
(the parent company of JMC Ocean State Corporation, which is a partner 
in OSP I an OSP II.) OSP I and OSP II are two separate Rhode Island 
general partnerships each of which owns and operates a combined-cycle 
wholesale electric generating in Burrillville, Rhode Island.
    Comment date: August 15, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

2. Power Barge Antilles, L.P.

[Docket No. EG94-88-000]

    On July 29, 1994, Power Barge Antilles, L.P. (``Antilles'') filed 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for 
determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to Part 365 
of the Commission's regulations.
    Antilles is a California limited partnership which is an indirect 
subsidiary of ESI Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of FPL Group, 
Inc. Antilles owns a 28.5 MW barge-mounted electric generating facility 
that it will use to sell electric energy exclusively at wholesale 
outside of the United States.
    Comment date: August 26, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

3. Oglethorpe Power Corp. v. Georgia Power Co. Municipal Electric 
Authority of Georgia v. Georgia Power Co.

[Docket No. EL94-81-000]

    Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Oglethorpe Power Corporation 
(Oglethorpe Power) and the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia 
(MEAG) (collectively the Complainants) filed a Joint Complaint against 
Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) pursuant to Sections 206 and 306 
of the Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure. The Complainants allege that Georgia Power 
Company unlawfully included certain capacity associated with a Unit 
Power Sale contract between Gulf States Utilities Company (Gulf States) 
and certain of the Southern Companies (including Georgia Power) in 
calculations of reserve charges under a Partial Requirements (PR) 
Tariff on file with the Commission applicable to sales to the 
Complainants. Complainants argue that Georgia Power violated the 
``filed rate'' doctrine because it included such capacity in reserve 
charge calculations in violation of a PR Tariff and a related 
settlement agreement between the parties.
    As an alternative theory of relief, Oglethorpe Power and MEAG argue 
that even if Georgia Power has not violated the ``filed rate'' 
doctrine, Georgia Power is obligated to share with ratepayers 
appropriate portions of the proceeds that it received from Gulf States, 
especially with PR customers who shouldered over $16.5 million, plus 
interest, in extra reserve cost associated with the flow-through of the 
Gulf States charges.
    Comment date: September 2, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice. Answers to the complaint shall 
be due on or before September 2, 1994.

4. Boston Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER94-1497-000]

    Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Boston Edison Company (Edison) 
filed a letter agreement between itself and thirteen Massachusetts 
municipal electric systems further extending the deadline for the 
Municipal's submission of objections to Edison's 1992 bills for 
services rendered under each municipal system's Pilgrim power purchase 
contract in 1992. On June 20, 1994, Boston Edison filed a letter 
agreement in Docket No. ER94-1383-000 extending that deadline from June 
20, 1994, until July 31, 1994. The new letter agreement extends that 
deadline from July 31, 1994 until August 15, 1994. The letter agreement 
makes no other changes to the rates, terms and conditions of the 
affected Pilgrim contracts.
    Edison states that it has served copies of this filing upon each of 
the affected customers and upon the three other Pilgrim power 
purchasers: Reading Municipal Light Department, Montaup Electric 
Company and Commonwealth Electric Company; as well as the Massachusetts 
Department of Public Utilities.
    Comment date: August 17, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

5. Union Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER94-1498-000]

    Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Union Electric Company (UE) 
tendered for filing a Transmission Service Agreement dated July 20, 
1994, between AES Power, Incorporated (AES) and UE. UE asserts that the 
purpose of the Agreement is to set out specific terms and conditions 
for transmission service transactions from UE to AES.
    Comment date: August 17, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

6. Southwestern Electric Power Co.

[Docket No. ER94-1499-000]

    Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Southwestern Electric Power 
Company (SWEPCO) submitted for filing an ``Agreement for Backup and 
Maintenance Service and Scheduling Agreement,'' dated July 27, 1994, 
(Agreement), between SWEPCO and Tex-La Electric Agreement, SWEPCO will 
schedule power and energy which East Texas Inc. (EPI), for the account 
of Tex-La. SWEPCO will also provide backup and maintenance service at 
such time as the power and energy from EPI are not available.
    SWEPCO seeks an effective date the later of August 1, 1994, or the 
date on which EPI energy and power is available for scheduling. 
Accordingly, SWEPCO seeks waiver of the Commission's notice 
requirements.
    Copies of the filing were served on Tex-La, ETEC and the Public 
Utility Commission of Texas. Copies are also available for inspection 
at SWEPCO's offices in Shreveport, Louisiana.
    Comment date: August 17, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

7. Public Service Company of New Mexico

[Docket No. ER94-1500-000]

    Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Public Service Company of New 
Mexico (PNM) tendered for filing a Letter Agreement Implementing 
Certain Temporary Arrangements (letter Agreement) between PNM and 
Plains Electric Generation Transmission Cooperative, Inc. (Plains). The 
Letter Agreement implements a reduction in cost to Plains under Service 
Schedule G to the PNM-Plains Master Interconnection Agreement until 
December 31, 1994.
    PNM has requested that the notice requirements of 18 CFR Section 
35.3 be waived, and that the Commission accept for filing the Letter 
Agreement, with an effective date of July 28, 1994.
    Copies of this filing have been served upon Plains and the New 
Mexico Public Service Commission.
    Comment date: August 17, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

8. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94-1504-000]

    Take notice that on July 29, 1994, Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy 
Services), on behalf of itself, Arkansas Power & Light Company, Gulf 
States Utilities Company, Louisiana Power & Light Company, Mississippi 
Power & Light Company (MP&L), and New Orleans Public Service Inc. 
(collectively, the Entergy Operating Companies), tendered for filing 
the Amendment (Amendment) to Interconnection Agreement between MP&L and 
South Mississippi Electric Power Association, dated as of July 18, 
1979, as amended (Interconnection Agreement). Entergy Services requests 
that the Amendment be made effective on May 17, 1994.
    Comment date: August 17, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

    E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-19390 Filed 8-8-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P