[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 8, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-13834]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: June 8, 1994]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part III
Department of Education
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards Under the Knowledge
Dissemination and Utilization Program for Fiscal Year 1994
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No. 84.133D]
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; National
Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards Under the Knowledge
Dissemination and Utilization Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 1994
Note to Applicants: This notice is a complete application
package. The notice contains information, application forms, and
instructions needed to apply for a grant under this competitions.
The final priorities for the Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization
program are published in this issue of the Federal Register. This
consolidated application package includes the closing date,
estimated funding, and application forms necessary to apply for an
award under this program's competition. Potential applicants should
consult the statement of the final priorities published in this
issue to ascertain the substantive requirements for their
applications.
The estimated funding level in this notice does not bind the
Department of Education to make awards or to any specific number of
awards or funding levels.
Note: The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992 require that
each applicant for a project under this competition must demonstrate
in its application how it will address the needs of individuals from
minority backgrounds who have disabilities.
Application Notice for Fiscal Year 1994--Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization Program, CFDA No. 84.133D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deadline for
ADA training project funding transmittal of Estimated number Estimated size of Project period
priority applications of awards awards (per year) (months)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Independent Living Centers.......... 07/22/94 1 $250,000 36
Family Organizations................ 07/22/94 1 250,000 36
School Districts.................... 07/22/94 1 250,000 36
State and Local ADA Coordinators and
Policymakers....................... 07/22/94 1 250,000 36
Hispanics Whose Proficiency in
English is Limited................. 07/22/94 1 250,000 36
Standards for Accessible Design..... 07/22/94 1 250,000 36
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before your application can be reviewed, it must include this
description. Applications for which this information is not received
will not be reviewed.
Successful applicants that provide services to individuals with
disabilities will be required to advise these individuals, or as
appropriate, the parents, family guardians, advocates, or authorized
representatives of these individuals, of the availability and purposes
of the State Client Assistance Program (CAP), including information on
means of seeking assistance under such programs. A list of State CAPs
will be provided to successful applicants when they are notified of
their award.
This notice supports the National Education Goal that calls for all
Americans to possess the knowledge and skills necessary to compete in a
global economy and exercise the rights and responsibilities of
citizenship.
If you need further information about these requirements, please
contact David Esquith at (202) 205-8801. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number at
(202) 205-5516.
Applicable Regulations
(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations
(EDGAR), 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 78, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86;
(b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR parts 350 and 355;
and
(c) The notice of final priorities as published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.
Purpose of Program
The Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization is designed to support
activities that will ensure that rehabilitation knowledge generated
from projects and centers funded by NIDRR and from other sources is
fully utilized to improve the lives of individuals with disabilities
and their families.
Selection Criteria
The Secretary uses the following selection criteria to evaluate
applications under this program.
(a) Potential Impact of Outcomes: Importance of Program (Weight
3.0). The Secretary reviews each application to determine to what
degree--
(1) The proposed activity relates to the announced priority;
(2) The research is likely to produce new and useful information
(research activities only);
(3) The need and target population are adequately defined;
(4) The outcomes are likely to benefit the defined target
populations;
(5) The training needs are clearly defined (training activities
only);
(6) The training methods and developed subject matter are likely to
meet the defined need (training activities only); and
(7) The need for information exists (utilization activities only).
(b) Potential Impact of Outcomes: Dissemination/Utilization (Weight
3.0). The Secretary reviews each application to determine to what
degree--
(1) The research results are likely to become available to others
working in the field (research activities only);
(2) The means to disseminate and promote utilization by others are
defined;
(3) The training methods and content are to be packaged for
dissemination and use by others (training activities only); and
(4) The utilization approach is likely to address the defined need
(utilization activities only).
(c) Probability of Achieving Proposed Outcomes; Program/Project
Design (Weight 5.0). The Secretary reviews each application to
determine to what degree--
(1) The objectives of the project(s) are clearly stated;
(2) The hypothesis is sound and based on evidence (research
activities only);
(3) The project design/methodology is likely to achieve the
objectives;
(4) The measurement methodology and analysis is sound;
(5) The conceptual model (if used) is sound (development/
demonstration activities only);
(6) The sample populations are correct and significant (research
and development/demonstration activities only);
(7) The human subjects are sufficiently protected (research and
development/demonstration activities only);
(8) The device(s) or model system is to be developed in an
appropriate environment;
(9) The training content is comprehensive and at an appropriate
level (training activities only);
(10) The training methods are likely to be effective (training
activities only);
(11) The new materials (if developed) are likely to be of high
quality and uniqueness (training activities only);
(12) The target populations are linked to the project (utilization
activities only); and
(13) The format of the dissemination medium is the best to achieve
the desired result (utilization activities only).
(d) Probability of Achieving Proposed Outcomes: Key Personnel
(Weight 4.0). The Secretary reviews each application to determine to
what degree--
(1) The principal investigator and other key staff have adequate
training and/or experience and demonstrate appropriate potential to
conduct the proposed research, demonstration, training, development, or
dissemination activity;
(2) The principal investigator and other key staff are familiar
with pertinent literature and/or methods;
(3) All required disciplines are effectively covered;
(4) Commitments of staff time are adequate for the project; and
(5) The applicant is likely, as part of its nondiscriminatory
employment practices, to encourage applications for employment from
persons who are members of groups that traditionally have been
underrepresented, such as--
(i) Members of racial or ethnic minority groups;
(ii) Women;
(iii) Handicapped persons; and
(iv) The elderly.
(e) Probability of Achieving Proposed Outcomes: Evaluation Plan
(Weight 1.0). The Secretary reviews each application to determine to
what degree--
(1) There is a mechanism to evaluate plans, progress and results;
(2) The evaluation methods and objectives are likely to produce
data that are quantifiable; and
(3) The evaluation results, where relevant, are likely to be
assessed in a service setting.
(f) Program/Project Management: Plan of Operation (Weight 2.0). The
Secretary reviews each application to determine to what degree--
(1) There is an effective plan of operation that insures proper and
efficient administration of the project(s);
(2) The applicant's planned use of its resources and personnel is
likely to achieve each objective;
(3) Collaboration between institutions, if proposed, is likely to
be effective; and
(4) There is a clear description of how the applicant will include
eligible project participants who have been traditionally
underrepresented, such as--
(i) Members of racial or ethnic minority groups;
(ii) Women;
(iii) Handicapped persons; and
(iv) The elderly.
(g) Program/Project Management: Adequacy of Resources (Weight 1.0).
The Secretary reviews each application to determine to what degree--
(1) The facilities planned for use are adequate;
(2) The equipment and supplies planned for use are adequate; and
(3) The commitment of the applicant to provide administrative
support and adequate facilities is evident.
(h) Program/Project Management: (Budget and Cost Effectiveness
(Weight 1.0). The Secretary reviews each application to determine to
what degree--
(1) The budget for the project(s) is adequate to support the
activities;
(2) The costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the
project(s); and
(3) The budget for subcontracts (if required) is detailed and
appropriate.
Eligible Applicants
Parties eligible to apply for grants under this program are public
and private nonprofit and for-profit agencies and organizations,
including institutions of higher education and Indian tribes and tribal
organizations.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 761a and 762.
Instructions for Transmittal of Applications
(a) If an applicant wants to apply for a grant, the applicant
shall--
(1) Mail the original and two copies of the application on or
before the deadline date to: U.S. Department of Education, Application
Control Center, Attention: (CFDA # [Applicant must insert number and
letter]), Washington, DC 20202-4725, or
(2) Hand deliver the original and two copies of the application by
4:30 p.m. [Washington, DC time] on the deadline date to: U.S.
Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA #
[Applicant must insert number and letter]), room #3633, Regional Office
Building #3, 7th and D Streets, SW., Washington, DC.
(b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.
(c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service,
the Secretary does not accept either of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should
check with its local post office.
(2) An applicant wishing to know that its application has been
received by the Department must include with the application a
stamped self-addressed postcard containing the CFDA number and title
of this program.
(3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and--if not
provided by the Department--in Item 10 of the Application for
Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA number--and letter,
if any--of the competition under which the application is being
submitted.
Application Forms and Instructions
The appendix to this application is divided into four parts. These
parts are organized in the same manner that the submitted application
should be organized. These parts are as follows:
PART I--Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424 (Rev.
4-88)) and instructions
PART II--Budget Form--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424A)
and instructions
PART III--Application Narrative
Additional Materials
Estimated Public Reporting Burden.
Assurances--Non--Non Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
Certification Regarding Lobbying, Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters: and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED
Form 80-0013).
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED Form ED 80-
0014) and instructions.
(Note: ED Form ED-80-0014 is intended for the use of primary
participants and should not be transmitted to the Department.)
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL (if applicable)
and instructions; and Disclosure Lobbying Activities Continuation
Sheet (Standard Form LLL-A).
An applicant may submit information on a photostatic copy of the
application and budget forms, the assurances, and the certifications.
However, the application form, the assurances, and the certifications
must each have an original signature. No grant may be awarded unless a
completed application form has been received.
Information about the Department's funding opportunities, including
copies of application notices for discretionary grant competitions, can
be viewed on the Department's electronic bulletin board (ED Board),
telephone (202) 260-9950; or on the Internet Gopher Server at
GOPHER.ED.GOV (under Announcements, Bulletins, and Press Releases).
However, the official application notice for a discretionary grant
competition in the notice published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dianne Villines, U.S. Department of
Education, room 3417 Switzer Building, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-2704. Telephone: (202) 205-9141. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD
number at (202) 205-8887.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 760-762.
Dated: June 3, 1994.
Judith E. Heumann,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
Appendix
Application Forms and Instructions
Applicants are advised to reproduce and complete the application
forms in this Section. Applicants are required to submit an original
and two copies of each application as provided in this Section.
Frequent Questions
1. Can I Get an Extension of the Due Date?
No! On rare occasions the Department of Education may extend a
closing date for all applicants. If that occurs, a notice of the
revised due date is published in the Federal Register. However, there
are no extensions or exceptions to the due date made for individual
applicants.
2. What Should Be Included in the Application?
The application should include a project narrative, vitae of key
personnel, and a budget, as well as the Assurances forms included in
this package. Vitae of staff or consultants should include the
individual's title and role in the proposed project, and other
information that is specifically pertinent to this proposed project.
The budgets for both the first year and subsequent project years should
be included.
If collaboration with another organization is involved in the
proposed activity, the application should include assurances of
participation by the other parties, including written agreements or
assurances of cooperation. It is not useful to include general letters
of support or endorsement in the application.
If the applicant proposes to use unique tests or other measurement
instruments that are not widely known in the field, it would be helpful
to include the instrument in the application.
Many applications contain voluminous appendices that are not
helpful and in many cases cannot even be mailed to the reviewers. It is
generally not helpful to include such things as brochures, general
capability statements of collaborating organizations, maps, copies of
publications, or descriptions of other projects completed by the
applicant.
3. What Format Should Be Used for the Application?
NIDRR generally advises applicants that they may organize the
application to follow the selection criteria that will be used. The
specific review criteria vary according to the specific program, and
are contained in this Consolidated Application Package.
4. May I Submit Applications to More Than One NIDRR Program
Competition or More Than One Application to a Program?
Yes, you may submit applications to any program for which they are
responsive to the program requirements. You may submit the same
application to as many competitions as you believe appropriate. You may
also submit more than one application in any given competition.
5. What Is the Allowable Indirect Cost Rate?
The limits on indirect costs vary according to the program and the
type of application.
Applicants in the FIR, AND Innovation grants programs should limit
indirect charges to the organization's approved rate. If the
organization does not have an approved rate, the application should
include an estimated actual rate.
6. Can Profitmaking Businesses Apply For Grants?
Yes. However, for-profit organizations will not be able to collect
a fee or profit on the grant, and in some programs will be required to
share in the costs of the project.
7. Can Individuals Apply For Grants?
No. Only organizations are eligible to apply for grants under NIDRR
programs.
8. Can NIDRR Staff Advise Me Whether My Project is of Interest to
NIDRR or Likely To Be Funded?
No. NIDRR staff can advise you of the requirements of the program
in which you propose to submit your application. However, staff cannot
advise you of whether your subject area or proposed approach is likely
to receive approval.
9. How Do I Assure That My Application Will Be Referred to the Most
Appropriate Panel For Review?
Applicants should be sure that their applications are referred to
the correct competition by clearly including the competition title and
CFDA number, including alphabetical code, on the Standard Form 424, and
including the title of the priority to which they are responding.
10. How Soon After Submitting My Application Can I Find Out If It
Will Be Funded?
The time from closing date to grant award date varies from program
to program. Generally speaking, NIDRR endeavors to have awards made
within five to six months of the closing date. Unsuccessful applicants
generally will be notified within that time frame as well. For the
purpose of estimating a project start date, the applicant should
estimate approximately six months from the closing date, but no later
than the following September 30.
11. Can I Call NIDRR To Find Out If My Application Is Being Funded?
No! When NIDRR is able to release information on the status of
grant applications, it will notify applicants by letter. The results of
the peer review cannot be released except through this formal
notification.
12. If My Application Is Successful, Can I Assume I Will Get the
Requested Budget Amount In Subsequent Years?
No. Those budget projections are necessary and helpful for planning
purposes. However, a complete budget and budget justification must be
submitted for each year of the project and there will be negotiations
on the budget each year.
13. Will All Approved Applications Be Funded?
No. It often happens that the peer review panels approve for
funding more applications than NIDRR can fund within available
resources. Applicants who are approved but not funded are encouraged to
consider submitting similar applications in future competitions.
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
TN08JN94.000
TN08JN94.001
TN08JN94.002
TN08JN94.003
TN08JN94.004
TN08JN94.005
TN08JN94.006
TN08JN94.007
TN08JN94.008
TN08JN94.009
TN08JN94.010
TN08JN94.011
TN08JN94.012
TN08JN94.013
TN08JN94.014
[FR Doc. 94-13931 Filed 6-7-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-C
_______________________________________________________________________
Part VII
Department of Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
Research and Special Programs Administration
_______________________________________________________________________
Pipeline Safety Summit; Notice
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Research and Special Programs Administration
Pipeline Safety Summit
AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA)
invites representatives of industry, state and local government, other
interested groups, and the public to a Pipeline Safety Summit. The
purpose of this open meeting is to assist RSPA in developing a public/
private agenda that establishes priorities for pipeline safety
initiatives and identifies the next steps needed to make them a
reality. The Summit will identify how to leverage available resources
to optimize public safety and environmental protection. This effort
will explore new and revised policies, procedures, and possible
legislation utilizing strengthened partnerships.
DATE AND LOCATION: The Pipeline Safety Summit will be held on June 20,
1994, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., at the Radisson Hotel, 128 Frontage
Road (Newark Airport), Newark, New Jersey, telephone (202) 690-5500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Whetsel, RSPA, U.S. Department
of Transportation, room 8321, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590, telephone (202) 366-4431, FAX (202) 366-7431. To pre-register
for the Summit, contact Ms. Whetsel by June 15. On-site registration
will begin at 7:30 a.m. on June 20.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 23, 1994, an interstate natural gas
transmission pipeline, operated by Texas Eastern Gas Pipeline Company,
exploded in Edison, NJ. Preliminary examination indicated evidence of
previously inflicted excavation damage to the pipeline. While the
incident resulted in only one fatality (a heart attack), it raised
important questions about the safety of pipelines. Following the
accident, Department of Transportation Secretary Federico Pena proposed
significant changes to the federal pipeline safety program for both the
short and the long terms.
Secretary Pena also announced that the Department would convene a
Pipeline Safety Summit, calling together experts to assess the current
state of the nation's pipeline system. The Summit will include four
panel discussions: allaying public concerns about pipeline safety,
using existing and evolving technologies to maximize pipeline safety,
calculating the cost of pipeline safety, and creating effective
partnerships for reducing pipeline risk. Limited time will be available
at the end of the day for the audience to ask questions of the
panelists.
To help ensure that all concerned voices are heard, RSPA invites
interested persons to submit brief 2-3 page issue papers in advance for
distribution at the June 20 Summit. To reduce reproduction costs,
please keep these papers concise and targeted on issues relevant to
enhancing pipeline safety and reducing the risk to the environment
associated with pipeline transportation.
Papers should arrive at the address noted above by June 15, 1994,
to be distributed at the Summit. RSPA will also accept papers until
July 20 for inclusion as appendices in the final report of the Summit
proceedings.
George W. Tenley, Jr.,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 94-13834 Filed 6-7-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P