[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-13389]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: June 2, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL94-64-000, et al.]

 

Middleborough Gas and Electric Department and Pascoag Fire 
District, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

May 24, 1994.
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. Middleborough Gas and Electric Department and Pascoag Fire District 
v. Montaup Electric Company and Eastern Edison Company

[Docket No. EL94-64-000]

    Take notice that on May 5, 1994, Middleborough Gas and Electric 
Department and Pascoag Fire District (Middleborough) tendered for 
filing a complaint against Montaup Electric Company and Eastern Edison 
Company. In its complaint Middleborough moves to consolidate this 
proceeding with Montaup Electric Company, ER94-1062-000.
    Middleborough and Pascoag seek an order from the Commission: (1) 
Finding that the rates charged by Montaup to Middleborough and Pascoag 
for their wholesale power purchases, as well as under the Middleborough 
breaker and radial contracts, may produce excessive revenues from 
Middleborough and Pascoag and should be subject to reduction and refund 
consistent with this complaint; (2) establishing a refund effective 
date 60 days after the date of filing of this complaint; (3) setting 
for hearing under section 206 whether the provisions of the 
Middleborough and Pascoag contracts regarding contract demands and 
terminations are unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory and 
preferential, or otherwise contrary to the public interest and if so, 
establishing just, reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or 
preferential terms; (4) consolidating the consideration of the matters 
raised by this complaint with the ongoing proceeding in Docket No. 
ER94-1062-000; and (5) affording Middleborough and Pascoag such other 
relief as may be deemed appropriate.
    Comment date: June 23, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

2. Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems v. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. EL94-66-000]

    Take notice that on May 18, 1994, the Utah Associated Municipal 
Power Systems (UAMPS) tendered for filing a revised complaint against 
PacifiCorp. In its complaint UAMPS states that PacifiCorp has refused 
to provide firm transmission services over existing facilities from 
UAMPS' resource available at Four Corners to UAMPS' loads in 
PacifiCorp's control area. UAMPS further states that it had seriously 
filed its complaint on May 6, 1994, but that it had revised the 
complaint and refiled it in light of recent Commission precedent. UAMPS 
requests that the revised complaint be substituted for its May 6, 1994 
complaint.
    Comment date: June 23, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

3. Cogenerators of Southern California, Midway-Sunset Cogeneration 
Company, Harbor Cogeneration Company, Kern River Cogeneration Company, 
Sycamore Cogeneration Company

[Docket No. EL94-69-000]

    Take notice that on May 16, 1994, Cogenerators of Southern 
California and its members tendered for filing a petition asking the 
Commission to undertake an enforcement action against the California 
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for implementing improperly the 
Commission's regulations under PURPA with respect to the calculation of 
avoided cost payments at the time of delivery.
    Comment date: June 13, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

4. Chicago Energy Exchange of Chicago, Inc.

[Docket No. ER90-225-016]

    Take notice that on April 7, 1994, Chicago Energy Exchange of 
Chicago, Inc. (Energy Exchange) filed certain information as required 
by the Ordering Paragraph (L) of the Commission's April 19, 1990 order 
in this proceeding, 51 FERC 61,054 (1990). Copies of Energy Exchange's 
informational filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.

5. Elkem Metals Company

[Docket No. ER94-966-000]

    Take notice that Elkem Metals Company (Elkem), on April 22, 1994, 
tendered for filing with the Commission additional information to its 
February 9, 1994, filing of an initial rate schedule pursuant to a 
request by Commission Staff.
    Copies of the filing were served by Elkem upon what will be its 
sole jurisdictional customer, Appalachian.
    Elkem renews the request for waiver made in its original February 
9, 1994, filing of the Commission's Rules and Regulations to permit the 
proposed sale to become effective on less than 60 days notice.
    Comment date: June 9, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

    E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-13389 Filed 6-1-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P