[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 18, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12084]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: May 18, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP94-368-000, et al.]

 

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate 
Filings

May 10, 1994.
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and Trunkline Gas Company

[Docket No. CP94-368-000]

    Take notice that on April 21, 1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252 and Trunkline Gas 
Company (Trunkline), P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251, filed in 
Docket No. CP94-368-000, a joint application as supplemented, pursuant 
to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to 
abandon an exchange service provided pursuant to Tennessee's Rate 
Schedules X-29 and X-35 and Trunkline's Rate Schedules E-2 and E-13, 
all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    It is stated that by order issued February 19, 1970, in Docket No. 
CP70-122-000, Tennessee and Trunkline were authorized to exchange 
natural gas pursuant to an agreement between them dated October 14, 
1969. The agreement, it is said, provided for Trunkline to deliver to 
Tennessee a maximum volume of 65,000 Mcf of natural gas per day at the 
Texas interconnection and receive equivalent volumes the same day from 
Tennessee at the Louisiana interconnection.
    It is stated further that by order issued May 2, 1972 in Docket No. 
CP72-111-000, Tennessee and Trunkline were authorized to exchange 
natural gas pursuant to an agreement between them dated October 11, 
1971. The agreement, it is said, provided for Tennessee to deliver to 
Trunkline at the Kinder Delivery point near Kinder, Louisiana or other 
mutually agreeable delivery points, daily volumes of up to 125,000 Mcf 
of natural gas and Trunkline would redeliver to Tennessee at the same 
delivery points quantities of exchange gas equal in volume to the 
quantities previously received by Trunkline.
    Tennessee and Trunkline state that due to restructuring of services 
under Order No. 636, these exchange services have been rendered 
obsolete and the parties have agreed, by mutual written agreement, to 
terminate them.
    No facilities are proposed to be abandoned herein.
    Comment date: May 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph F 
at the end of this notice.

2. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company

[Docket No. CP94-526-000]

    Take notice that on May 4, 1994, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in Docket No. 
CP94-526-000 a request pursuant to Sec. 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization to 
install a one-inch tap in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi, under 
its blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-430-000, all as more 
fully set forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Koch states that the proposed sales tap will serve a farm tap 
customer of Entex, Inc. (Entex). Koch further states that the volumes 
proposed to be delivered to Entex will be within Entex's currently 
effective entitlements.
    Comment date: June 24, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
G at the end of this notice.

3. CNG Transmission Corporation

[Docket No. CP94-531-000]

    Take notice that on May 5, 1994, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), 445 West Main Street, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301, filed in 
Docket No. CP94-531-000, a request pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) for 
authorization to construct a new transportation tap in Monongalia 
County, West Virginia under CNG's blanket certificate issued in Docket 
No. CP82-537-000 pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    CNG states that the facility would serve as a new delivery point to 
Hope Gas, Inc. (Hope), a local distribution company and an affiliate of 
CNG. CNG further states that Hope would install a small meter and 
regulation (M&R) station to serve the new Jamestown Residential 
Subdivision, which is currently under construction, south of 
Morgantown, West Virginia.
    CNG says that it would tap into its existing 10-inch TL-387 
pipeline located near Morgantown, Monongalia County, West Virginia, 
with Hope's new small M & R station being adjacent to CNG's TL-387 
pipeline.
    CNG states it would transport the quantities for Hope, destined for 
the new residential development, under existing, certificated Part 284 
transportation arrangements with Hope. In order to make deliveries to 
Hope, for redelivery to the residential development, CNG must construct 
a two-inch ``hot'' tap and valve on its TL-387 pipeline. The total 
estimated cost of CNG's construction is $2000, which is to be fully 
reimbursed by Hope. Additionally, Hope would be installing a new meter 
and regulator within a 20-foot by 20-foot fenced area within CNG's 
existing TL-387 right-of-way. The maximum design capacity of the 2-inch 
tap and M & R is 500 Mcf per day, it is stated.
    Additionally, CNG states that it has sufficient system delivery 
capacity to deliver these quantities, under existing contractual 
arrangements with Hope, without disadvantaging its existing customers. 
Finally, CNG verifies that the proposed construction complies with the 
requirements of Subpart F of Part 157 of the Commission's Regulations 
under the Natural Gas Act.
    Comment date: June 24, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
G at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

    F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before the comment date, 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a 
party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in 
accordance with the Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval 
for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and 
necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if 
the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
    G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-12084 Filed 5-17-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P