[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 93 (Monday, May 16, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-11380]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: May 16, 1994]


                                                    VOL. 59, NO. 93

                                               Monday, May 16, 1994

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 1, 4, 30, 150

 

Proposed Amendments to Commodity Pool Operator and Commodity 
Trading Advisor Disclosure Rules

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rules.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``Commission'' or 
``CFTC'') is proposing substantial revisions to the disclosure 
framework applicable to commodity pool operators (``CPOs'') and 
commodity trading advisors (``CTAs''). The proposed amendments reflect 
the Commission's experience in applying the disclosure requirements set 
forth in part 4 of the Commission's rules and significant evolution in 
the purposes, structure and activities of the managed funds 
marketplace. These proposed modifications of the CPO and CTA disclosure 
framework are designed to achieve greater simplicity, focus and clarity 
in performance history presentations; streamlining of other required 
disclosures; and a more concise and readable format for disclosure 
documents.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rules must be received on or before 
July 15, 1994.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be sent to Jean A. Webb, Secretary of the 
Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20581.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan C. Ervin, Deputy Director/Chief 
Counsel, or France M.T. Maca, Division of Trading and Markets, 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Street NW., Washington, DC 
20581. Telephone: (202) 254-8955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commission Rule 4.211 requires that 
each CPO registered or required to be registered under the Commodity 
Exchange Act (``Act'' or ``CEA''), 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq. (1988 & Supp. 
1992), provide prospective participants with a disclosure document 
containing the information specified in the rule on or before the date 
it solicits, accepts or receives funds, securities or other property 
from prospective participants for a pool it operates or intends to 
operate. Each CTA who is registered or required to be registered is 
also required, by Rule 4.31, to deliver a disclosure document prior to 
or at the time of soliciting or entering into an agreement to direct or 
guide the commodity interest account of a prospective client. These 
requirements were first promulgated on January 8, 1979, when the 
Commission published part 4 of its regulations relating to the 
operations and activities of CPOs and CTAs.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\Commission rules referred to herein are found at 17 CFR Ch. I 
(1993).
    \2\44 FR 1918 (January 8, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Summary of Proposed Rule Changes

    Based upon more than fifteen years of experience with administering 
the part 4 disclosure framework for CPOs and CTAs, the Commission has 
undertaken a comprehensive review of the disclosure requirements for 
CPOs and CTAs to identify areas in which the regulatory structure can 
be streamlined or simplified, while continuing to provide appropriate 
customer protection. Rules 4.7 and 4.8 were adopted in August 1992 as a 
result of the first phase of this review.3 This proposal 
represents the second phase of the Commission's review of part 4, which 
will also include consideration of the appropriateness of a two-part 
format for pool disclosure documents.4 The Commission is seeking 
public comment on proposed revisions of Rules 4.21 and 4.31. The 
amendments have three major purposes: (1) Simplification of past 
performance disclosures; (2) reduction of required disclosures as to 
matters of secondary relevance; and (3) clarification and modernization 
of various requirements. In addition, Rules 4.21 and 4.31 would be 
redrafted, reorganized and renumbered with a view towards greater 
clarity, simplicity and congruence with contemporary managed funds 
practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\57 FR 34853 (August 7, 1992). Subject to certain conditions, 
Rule 4.7(a) provides relief from the specific requirements of Rules 
4.21 and 4.23 and from certain of the requirements of Rule 4.22 to 
registered CPOs with respect to pools sold only to ``qualified 
eligible participants'' and satisfying the other conditions set 
forth in the rule. Rule 4.7(b) provides relief from the specific 
requirements of Rules 4.31 and 4.32 to registered CTAs with respect 
to the accounts of ``qualified eligible clients'' as defined in the 
rule. Rule 4.8 permits the CPOs of certain privately offered pools 
to solicit participants for those pools upon filing with the 
Commission and delivering to prospective participants the disclosure 
document required by Rule 4.21, eliminating the twenty-one day pre-
filing requirement of Rule 4.21(g) for such pools.
    \4\If determined to be appropriate, such a document could 
consist of: A summary disclosure document, provided to all 
prospective pool participants, containing core information relevant 
to a determination to participate in the pool; and a supplemental 
document, which would be made available upon request, containing 
additional and more detailed information of interest to some 
investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed revisions to the disclosure requirements for CPO 
disclosure documents include the following.

A. Performance Disclosures

    Under the proposal, past performance disclosures would be 
simplified and streamlined as follows.
    1. All past performance presentations for pools would be reduced to 
a summary format containing specified core information.
    2. For pools which have been in operation for at least three years, 
the only past performance record required generally would be that of 
the pool offered.
    3. For pools with less than a three-year history, only the 
performance records of the pool offered, other pools operated by the 
CPO, CTAs allocated at least twenty-five percent of the aggregate 
initial futures margins and commodity option premiums for the pool 
offered and investee pools allocated at least twenty-five percent of 
the assets of the pool offered generally would be required. If the CPO 
has less than a three-year history, the past performance records of the 
CPO's principals would be required to be disclosed.
    4. Certain performance data of secondary relevance to the pool 
offering would be replaced by a statement indicating whether that 
performance was ``adverse,'' i.e., the performance was one hundred 
basis points lower than the relevant Treasury Bill rate or the pool had 
to be terminated due to poor performance pursuant to a loss termination 
provision.

B. Non-Performance Disclosures

    Non-performance disclosures would be revised as follows.
    1. Required disclosures concerning the litigation history of 
futures commission merchants (``FCMs'') would be significantly reduced.
    2. Disclosure of the business backgrounds of principals would be 
limited to principals who participate in making trading or operational 
decisions for the pool or CTA.
    3. Requirements for disclosure of conflicts of interest would no 
longer make specific reference to FCMs and introducing brokers 
(``IBs''). However, a general requirement to disclose conflicts of 
interest on the part of any persons providing services to the pool, 
which would encompass FCMs and IBs as well as persons who may not be 
Commission registrants, would be included.
    4. The required description of each fee and expense of the pool 
would be supplemented by a tabular presentation of fees and expenses 
setting forth how the ``break-even point'' for the pool is calculated. 
The break-even point is the per-unit profit that the pool must realize 
during its first year for a participant to recoup his initial 
investment in the pool.

C. Format Improvements to Enhance Readability

    A number of revisions to the rules are being proposed to enhance 
the accessibility and prominence of relevant disclosures. Disclosure 
documents would be required to contain a table of contents. General 
information concerning the pool, including the break-even point, would 
be required to be set forth in the forepart of the document. The number 
and content of various previously required bold-face ``boilerplate'' 
cautionary statements would be reduced and all information voluntarily 
provided would be required to follow the relevant required disclosures.

D. Other Revisions

    Changes are also proposed to generally facilitate pool offerings, 
particularly with respect to areas of overlap or potential 
inconsistency with Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'') rules. 
Thus, under the revisions, CPOs may update pool disclosure documents 
every nine months, consistent with SEC requirements, rather than every 
six months, as under current CFTC rules. In addition, CPOs may provide 
accredited investors with a notice of intended offering and term sheet, 
prior to delivery of a disclosure document.
    Similar changes are proposed to be made to the requirements 
applicable to CTA disclosure documents.
    The proposed changes are more specifically discussed in the 
section-by-section analysis.

II. Background

    In announcing the adoption of part 4 in 1979, the Commission stated 
that Rule 4.21, the basic disclosure document requirement for CPOs, was 
intended ``to protect pool participants--particularly those who are 
unsophisticated in financial matters--by ensuring that they are 
informed about the material facts regarding the pool before they commit 
their funds.''5 Similarly, Rule 4.31 was premised, in part, upon 
the view that ``a prospective [CTA] client or subscriber should be 
aware of the advisor's commodity and general business experience if he 
is to make an informed decision as to whether or not to avail himself 
of the advisor's services.''6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\44 FR 1918, 1920.
    \6\42 FR 9278, 9279 (February 15, 1977).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 4.21 requires the disclosure document for commodity pools 
to contain various types of information concerning the pool; the pool's 
CPO and CTA, and their principals; the FCM through which the pool's 
trades will be executed and cleared; and the pool's IB, if applicable. 
This information includes, among other things, the pool's and CPO's 
form of organization (Rule 4.21(a)(1)(i)); the pool's investment 
objectives (Rule 4.21(a)(1)(viii)); the business backgrounds of the CPO 
and CTA and their principals (Rule 4.21(a)(2)); material 
administrative, civil or criminal actions within the five years 
preceding the date of the disclosure document against the CPO, CTA, FCM 
and IB and their principals (Rule 4.21(a)(13)(i)); conflicts of 
interest on the part of the CPO, CTA, FCM, IB and their principals with 
respect to the pool (Rule 4.21(a)(3)(i)); the performance records of 
the pool and its CTA (Rules 4.21 (a)(4) and (a)(5), respectively) and, 
if the pool has traded commodity interests for less than twelve months, 
the performance of each other pool operated by the CPO and by each of 
its principals (Rule 4.21(a)(4)(i)(B)); a complete description of each 
kind of expense that the pool has incurred in its preceding fiscal year 
or is expected to incur in its current fiscal year (Rule 4.21(a)(7)) 
and of commissions or other fees that are paid or may be paid by the 
pool, its CPO, CTA or their principals in connection with solicitations 
for the pool (Rule 4.21(a)(14)); and risk disclosure and cautionary 
statements (Rules 4.21(a)(17) and 4.21(a)(18), respectively).
    The disclosure document for CTAs must contain, among other matters, 
the name and business background of the CTA and each principal thereof 
(Rules 4.21(a)(1) and 4.21(a)(2), respectively); a description of the 
trading program (Rule 4.31(a)(1)(iii)); the types of commodity 
interests the CTA intends to trade (Rule 4.31(a)(v)); the performance 
record of the CTA and its principals (Rule 4.31(a)(3)); a description 
of any conflict of interest regarding the trading program on the part 
of the CTA, FCM, IB and their principals (Rule 4.31(a)(5)); material 
actions against the foregoing persons (Rule 4.31(a)(7)); and risk 
disclosure and cautionary statements (Rules 4.31(a)(8) and 4.31(a)(9), 
respectively).
    Since the adoption of Rules 4.21 and 4.31 in 1979, the number of 
registered CPOs has more than doubled and the number of CTAs has 
increased nearly threefold.7 Assets under the management of CPOs 
have also grown dramatically8 and the range of available futures 
and option contracts has increased substantially.9 In addition, 
during the past decade, pool operations and investments have reflected 
increased diversity and complexity. When Rule 4.21 came into effect, 
most CPOs operated one or two pools, and pools usually had one CPO 
which generally directed the commodity interest trading for the pool or 
engaged the services of a CTA who invested pool assets directly in 
commodity interest contracts. Increasingly, however, CPOs operate 
multiple pools, and commodity pools' and CTAs' investments are more 
diverse and complex.10 A single commodity pool may engage multiple 
CTAs to provide advisory services for the pool and also invest in other 
commodity pools (``investee pools'') or securities funds in order to 
access the services of particular traders or advisors, to employ 
multiple trading strategies or programs, or to diversify its 
portfolio.11 ``Investee pools'' may also hold investments in other 
funds, resulting in multi-tiered structures of commodity pools and 
other investment vehicles. Because of the proliferation of trading 
strategies and growing specialization of CTAs, an increasing number of 
pools also retain ``trading managers'' to recommend or select CTAs for 
the pool or to select funds for investment of the pool's assets. Many 
CPOs and trading managers follow dynamic asset allocation strategies 
whereby the performance of the pool's CTAs is continuously reviewed and 
the selection of CTAs and allocation of assets among them are subject 
to frequent modification. Other commodity pools are formed as vehicles 
for collective access to particular CTAs whose services would not be 
readily available on a managed account basis and who are expected to 
provide advisory services to the pool throughout its existence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\In April 1979, 619 persons were registered as CPOs and 976 
persons as CTAs. As of February 28, 1994 there were 1,265 registered 
CPOs and 2,511 registered CTAs.
    \8\Figures compiled by the National Futures Association indicate 
that the assets of commodity pools (both public and private) have 
more than doubled from 1988 to 1991, from approximately $8.6 billion 
to approximately $19 billion. Managed Accounts Reports (``MAR'') 
estimates public pool assets at $15 million in 1975, $250 million in 
1980 and $435 million in 1983. These data reflect, in part, the 
increased use of managed futures by collective investment vehicles 
seeking to diversify their portfolios or manage the risks of 
securities, fixed income instruments or other assets. Concomitantly, 
institutional users such as state pension plans have increased their 
participation in managed futures. See Peltz, The road to managed 
futures--the institutional perspective, MAR Issue No. 181 (March 
1994). In addition, many primarily securities vehicles invest a 
small portion of their assets in commodity interests pursuant to 
Rule 4.12(b), which went into effect on November 2, 1987. See note 
13 infra.
    \9\Commodity futures and option contracts designated by the CFTC 
numbered 90 in 1978 and 419 as of April 18, 1994.
    \1\0For example, in addition to investing directly and 
indirectly in commodity interest contracts traded on U.S. contract 
markets, pools and managed accounts may engage in a variety of other 
transactions, such as swaps, Separate Trading of Registered Interest 
and Principal of Securities (also known as STRIPS), and repurchase 
and reverse repurchase agreements.
    \1\1For its Survey of Commodity Pool Operators, (the ``Pool 
Survey'') dated January 1991, the Commission's Division of Economic 
Analysis surveyed sixty-five large CPOs (defined as those with over 
$10 million in net assets under management) representing about 94 
percent of the total $7.8 billion in net assets reported by the 
approximately 1,200 CPOs registered as of September 30, 1988. The 
Pool Survey indicated that, on average, each large CPO operated 
about four pools and employed about two CTAs per pool. At the upper 
end of the range, the Pool Survey showed two CPOs accounting for 20 
or more pools each and three pools employing the services of as many 
as 14 CTAs each. The National Futures Association reported that, as 
of October 1993, for 300 pools the CPO also served as CTA, 376 pools 
had one CTA and 216 pools had more than one CTA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In implementing its statutory mandate to regulate the activities of 
CPOs and CTAs, the Commission has endeavored to refine its rules as 
appropriate to respond to changing market conditions and to simplify 
and streamline the disclosure process in a manner consistent with 
customer protection. For example, in 1985, the Commission adopted Rule 
4.5, which, as last amended,12 provides an exclusion from the 
definition of the term ``commodity pool operator'' for the operators of 
specified types of collective investment vehicles operating pursuant to 
other regulatory frameworks, i.e., certain pension plans, registered 
investment companies, bank or trust company collective funds and 
insurance company separate accounts, whose use of futures and commodity 
option transactions is limited to hedging and to non-hedging 
transactions for which initial margin deposits and option premiums do 
not exceed five percent of the liquidation value of the entity's 
portfolio.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\258 FR 43791 (August 18, 1993), effective September 17, 1993.
    \1\3Rule 4.12(b) allows the use of a simplified disclosure 
document that does not contain, among other things, the past 
performance records, risk disclosure and cautionary statements 
otherwise required by Rule 4.21. Thus, a pool's securities offering 
memorandum should require little supplementation to meet the 
requirements for a pool disclosure document under Rule 4.12(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 1987, the Commission adopted Rule 4.12(b), which provides relief 
from certain requirements of Rules 4.21, 4.22 and 4.23 with respect to 
pools that commit no more than ten percent of the fair market value of 
their assets to establish commodity interest positions and trade such 
commodity interests in a manner solely incidental to their securities 
trading. Also in 1987, the Commission adopted Rule 4.14(a)(8), which 
provides registration relief to investment advisers registered as such 
with the SEC, who provide commodity interest trading advice to trading 
vehicles that are excluded from the definition of the term ``pool'' 
under Rule 4.5 or are qualifying entities for which a notice of 
eligibility has been filed under Rule 4.5, provided that the investment 
adviser's commodity interest trading advice is solely incidental to the 
adviser's business of providing securities advice and consistent with 
Rule 4.5, and that the investment adviser does not otherwise hold 
itself out as a CTA.
    In August 1992, the Commission adopted Rule 4.7, which provides 
relief from certain part 4 requirements to CPOs offering pool 
participations and to CTAs offering managed accounts to certain highly 
accredited investors.14 Rule 4.7 also facilitates multi-
jurisdictional offerings by making relief available for private 
offerings exempt from registration pursuant to section 4(2) of the 
Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act'') and pursuant to the SEC's 
Regulation S15 and by including certain foreign persons as 
eligible participants in pools qualifying for Rule 4.7 
exemption.16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\4See note 3 supra.
    \1\5Regulation S generally provides that the registration 
requirements of the Securities Act do not apply to offers and sales 
of securities that occur outside the United States and provides two 
safe harbors from those requirements for specified offerings where 
no ``directed selling efforts'' are made in the United States. 
``Directed selling efforts'' are activities undertaken for the 
purpose of, or that could reasonably be expected to result in, 
conditioning of the market in the United States for the securities 
being offered. See 55 FR 18306 at 18307 (May 2, 1990).
    \1\6As of April 5, 1994, relief has been claimed under Rule 
4.7(a) for 360 pools, and 150 CTAs have claimed relief under Rule 
4.7(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Division of Trading and Markets (``Division'') has 
issued relief on a case-by-case basis to facilitate application of the 
disclosure requirements in the context of new market conditions not 
contemplated by the existing regulatory framework, such as multiple CTA 
and fund-of-funds structures, with the objective of fostering clear and 
succinct disclosure of material information, especially concerning fees 
and the manner in which proceeds of the offering will be used. In many 
cases, strict application of existing disclosure requirements to pools 
whose CPOs have voluminous performance histories or which retain 
multiple CTAs or invest in multiple investee funds may result in such 
extensive track record disclosure that past performance records 
generally may be given undue emphasis and the most germane data given 
insufficient prominence. These effects have been mitigated in 
appropriate circumstances through grants of exemptive or no-action 
relief. For example, in Interpretative Letter No. 92-12,17 the 
Division granted relief from required disclosures (including disclosure 
of past performance records) concerning CTAs and investee pools 
allocated less than ten percent of the assets of the investor pool. The 
CPO had an operating history of more than three years and changed the 
pools' CTAs frequently based on its continuous analysis of over 500 
CTAs. This relief has since been made available to other CPOs in 
similar circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\7(1990-1992 Transfer Binder), Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 
25,343 (July 28, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Interpretative Letter 94-10, the Division granted relief 
permitting a CPO to use a summary format containing specified core 
information to present, in the disclosure document of a single-advisor 
pool, its past performance with respect to other pools operated by the 
CPO, none of which was advised by the same CTA as the single-advisor 
pool. The CTA advising the single-advisor pool had a ten-year track 
record that would be fully disclosed in the disclosure document of the 
single-advisor pool and the full performance record of the CPO's other 
pools would be available upon request.18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\8[Current Transfer Binder], Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 25,991 
(December 16, 1993). The Division also allowed the use of a capsule 
performance disclosure format in Interpretative Letter 94-12 under 
similar circumstances. [Current Transfer Binder], Comm. Fut. L. Rep. 
(CCH) 25,993 (December 27, 1993). In Interpretative Letter No. 93-
107 the Division granted relief permitting a CPO to omit disclosure 
of the past performance of certain single-advisor pools in the CPO's 
disclosure documents for two multi-advisor pools, provided that the 
CPO gave a brief description of the single-advisor pools and made 
their performance records available upon request. This relief was 
based upon representations that the CPO, which played an active role 
as an administrator and asset allocator for the multi-advisor pools, 
performed no asset allocation functions for the single-advisor pools 
and that the single-advisor pools served as vehicles to provide 
access to commodity pools advised by certain experienced CTAs whose 
minimum investment levels for managed accounts would otherwise have 
been prohibitive for individual investors. The CPO's track record as 
an asset allocator would be more significant in the context of 
multi-advisor funds than its track record in the context of single 
advisor funds, where the skill of the individual CTA would be of 
greater interest to prospective participants. [Current Transfer 
Binder], Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 25,899 (October 26, 1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Interpretative Letter No. 92-9,19 the Division permitted a 
CPO to use a two-part disclosure document for a commodity pool 
provided, among other things, that both parts of the disclosure 
document were delivered at the same time and that the first part of the 
document contained all of the disclosures required by Rule 4.21 except 
for the disclosures required by Rule 4.21(a)(5) with respect to the 
performance records of the pool's CTAs, which were required to be 
included in the second part. By Advisory 27-92 (June 3, 1992), the 
Division gave notice that it had no objection to the use of a two-part 
disclosure document of the nature described above by other CPOs, 
subject to the conditions set forth in the foregoing letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\9(1990-1992 Transfer Binder), Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 
25,300 (June 1, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In reviewing CPO disclosure documents, Division staff has addressed 
fund-of-funds structures by requiring that certain disclosures be made 
with respect to investee pools but limiting these disclosures with 
respect to investee pools allocated less than twenty-five percent of 
the assets of the pool offered.20 The Division has also issued 
interpretative statements and advisories giving guidance with respect 
to the presentation of past performance in disclosure documents.21
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\0Staff comment letters have stated that pool disclosure 
documents should provide all information required by Rule 4.21 for 
each investee pool, ``generally at the same level of detail as 
though the investee pool were providing its own separate disclosure 
document,'' but that reduced disclosures were appropriate where less 
than twenty-five percent of the assets of the pool offered is 
invested in the investee pool. Moreover, the staff indicated that it 
is always willing to address specific requests for relief and has 
done so in appropriate circumstances.
    \2\1See, e.g., CFTC Advisory 87-2, (1986-1987 Transfer Binder) 
Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 23,624 (June 2, 1987), defining the term 
``beginning net asset value'' for purposes of computing rate of 
return; CFTC Advisory dated February 27, 1991 (1990-1992 Transfer 
Binder) Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 25,005, permitting CPOs and CTAs 
to use alternative rate of return computation methods to more 
accurately reflect the return on funds available for trading during 
the period; and CFTC Advisory 93-13, (Current Transfer Binder) Comm. 
Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 25,554 (February 12, 1993), permitting the use 
of an alternative method for computing CTAs' rates of return. The 
use of this method may result in fewer and simplified performance 
tables.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In developing this proposal, the Commission has taken into account 
its experience in administering the current regulatory framework, 
reviewing disclosure documents and responding to requests for relief 
from registrants. The Commission has also taken into consideration the 
evolution of the industry, the views of the public and of market 
participants and the disclosure implications of recently developed 
trading structures.
    The Commission also has had the benefit of the work of a Special 
Committee for the Review of CPO/CTA Disclosure Issues established by 
the National Futures Association (``NFA'')22 to review and make 
recommendations concerning CPO and CTA disclosure documents. The 
Special Committee's recommendations were presented to NFA's Board of 
Directors in February 1994. On March 15, 1994, the NFA submitted to the 
Commission proposed amendments to, and interpretations of, its 
Compliance Rules which were based upon the Special Committee's 
recommendations. NFA's rule submission consists of several parts. 
Proposed revisions of NFA Compliance Rule 2-13(a) would require CPOs to 
comply, not only with specified Commission rules applicable to CPOs' 
and CTAs' activities and disclosures, but also with interpretations of 
those rules issued by NFA's Board of Directors and approved by the 
Commission. Separately, new paragraph (b) would be added to Compliance 
Rule 2-13 to require CPO disclosure documents to include a ``break-
even'' analysis, i.e., a computation of the trading profit that a pool 
must realize in its first year for a participant to recoup its initial 
investment, presented in the manner prescribed by the NFA's Board of 
Directors, including a tabular presentation of fees and expenses. NFA 
is also proposing interpretations of proposed Compliance Rule 2-13 
relating to disclosure of past performance information, the computation 
and presentation of the break-even analysis, the use of pro forma and 
extracted results in past performance presentations and other topics 
addressed by this proposal, including the disclosure of business 
backgrounds of CPO and CTA principals, material litigation against FCMs 
and other past performance issues. In addition, NFA is proposing to 
replace paragraph (b)(4) of NFA Rule 2-29 with a new, more detailed, 
paragraph (c) concerning the use of hypothetical trading results. 
References to the NFA proposal are made in appropriate sections of this 
release.23 Certain portions of that proposal are being published 
for comment contemporaneously with this release. The NFA submission is 
available from the Commission's Office of the Secretariat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\2NFA is presently the only futures association registered 
with the Commission pursuant to section 17 of the Act. It has 
responsibilities with respect to, among others things, oversight of 
sales practices, including the use of promotional material.
    \2\3The NFA submission also includes proposed new Compliance 
Rule 2-34 which would govern the use of non-fully funded accounts. 
This part of NFA's submission has been remitted by the Commission to 
NFA for further explanation and supporting material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is exploring possible mechanisms for addressing CPO 
and CTA disclosure issues with the benefit of industry and other 
external input on an ongoing basis.

III. Section-by-Section Analysis

    Current Rule 4.21 would be reorganized with a view towards 
simplification of presentation. Rule 4.21 would continue to require 
CPOs to deliver a disclosure document. New Rule 4.24 sets forth general 
disclosure requirements, i.e., requirements applicable to disclosure of 
all matters other than past performance. Past performance disclosure 
requirements would be codified in new Rule 4.25. New Rule 4.26 would 
contain requirements with respect to the use, amendment and filing of 
the disclosure document.24
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\4The disclosure requirements for CTAs would be 
correspondingly reorganized and set forth in Rules 4.31, 4.33, 4.34 
and 4.35. Many of the proposed changes for pool disclosure documents 
are also proposed for CTA documents. Rather than repeating the 
discussion of these changes, the text or footnotes thereto indicate 
where amendments similar to those discussed for pool disclosure 
documents are also proposed for CTA disclosure documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Section 4.25--Performance Disclosures

    Simplification of past performance disclosure requirements has been 
a primary objective of this rulemaking. The proposed revisions of the 
past performance disclosure requirements are predicated upon the view 
that past performance is not predictive of future performance results 
and that inclusion of multiple performance records in disclosure 
documents may tend to give undue importance to past performance data. 
Nonetheless, the Commission believes that past performance disclosure 
may serve to reveal negative performance results and the volatility of 
pool returns. Consequently, the Commission is proposing to 
substantially simplify past performance requirements with the objective 
of eliminating required disclosure of past performance that is of 
secondary relevance to the pool offered.
    The proposed rules are designed to foster clarity and simplicity. 
This objective would be achieved in part by substituting a summary of 
core performance data for the multicolumnar presentations called for 
under current rules. This new ``capsule'' format, which has recently 
been used by some CPOs pursuant to exemptive relief issued by the 
Division of Trading and Markets on a case-by-case basis,25 
provides a simple, readable and succinct overview of pool performance 
and substantially reduces the overall quantity of performance data 
required to be presented without sacrificing the elements important to 
customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\5The proposed summary format differs in minor respects from 
that used by those CPOs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The past performance disclosure requirements have also been 
comprehensively reviewed and revised with a view towards eliminating or 
reducing past performance disclosures of secondary importance. As a 
result, the primary focus of past performance disclosure would be the 
performance of the pool offered and for most pools with less than a 
three year operating history, upon pools of a similar nature. Only the 
past performance records of CTAs with responsibility for managing 
substantial amounts of a pool's futures or commodity option trading 
would be required. The performance of CTAs managing lesser amounts of 
the pool's futures trading and other performance data of secondary 
relevance to the offering would generally not be required except to the 
extent that such performance was below a specified benchmark rate of 
return or resulted in significant losses. The performance of pools 
dissimilar to the pool offered would be permitted to be shown in 
composites, subject to limitations on the types of pools that may be 
included in a composite.
    The proposed rules also take into account structures in which a 
trading manager, rather than the pool's CPO, allocates pool assets, and 
fund-of-funds structures. In addition, because, under the proposal, the 
volume of required performance disclosures would be considerably 
reduced, the time period for these disclosures would be increased from 
three to five years to provide pool participants with a better 
chronological perspective of the track records presented in the 
disclosure document.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\This recommendation is consistent with a similar 
recommendation by the NFA Special Committee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, the proposed past performance requirements require 
presentation of the past performance of the pool itself. For most pools 
with at least a three-year track record this would be the only past 
performance required to be disclosed. Proposed Rule 4.25(c) would 
require the following additional disclosures with respect to pools with 
less than a three-year history. If the pool has not commenced trading, 
a short statement to that effect would be required to be prominently 
disclosed. The performance of the CPO (or of the pool's trading 
manager, if applicable) would be required to be disclosed and if the 
CPO (trading manager) had less than a three-year trading history, the 
performance of its trading principals also would be required.\27\ If 
applicable, a legend would be required to disclose the fact that 
neither the CPO (or trading manager), nor its principals has any 
commodity interest trading experience.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\This performance would be presented in a capsule format and 
the performance of pools of a different class than the pool offered 
could be presented in a composite format. See discussion of proposed 
Rule 4.25(a)(3)(ii) relating to composites, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to CTAs and investee pools, proposed Rule 4.25(c)(3) 
would provide for disclosure of the performance of ``major'' CTAs and 
investee pools, i.e., CTAs allocated at least twenty-five percent of 
the pool's aggregate initial futures margins and commodity option 
premiums and investee pools allocated at least twenty-five percent of 
the pool's assets, to be set forth in the specified capsule format. The 
CPO would only be required to indicate any ``adverse performance'' as 
defined in proposed Rule 4.25(a)(8) on the part of CTAs allocated less 
than twenty-five but at least ten percent of the pool's futures margins 
and commodity option premiums and investee pools allocated less than 
twenty-five percent but at least ten percent of the assets of the pool 
offered. No performance disclosure would be required for CTAs allocated 
less than ten percent of the pool's futures margins and commodity 
option premiums or investee pools allocated less than ten percent of 
the pool's assets. If a major CTA or investee pool had no experience in 
trading commodity interests, a prominent legend would be required to so 
indicate. The legend would also indicate the percentage of futures 
margins and option premiums allocated to the particular CTA or pool 
assets allocated to the investee pool.
    Past performance disclosure requirements would be codified in Rule 
4.25, which would contain three sections. Paragraph (a) would set forth 
general principles applicable to pool performance disclosure; paragraph 
(b) would set forth the requirements applicable to pools with three or 
more years history; and paragraph (c) would address other pools.\28\ 
The proposed changes are more fully described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\Rule 4.34, which sets forth performance disclosure 
requirements for CTA disclosure documents, would include paragraph 
(a), setting forth general principles applicable to CTA performance 
disclosures, and paragraph (b) setting forth specific requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Capsule Performance Presentation
    Rule 4.21(a)(4) currently requires performance to be disclosed in 
tables showing at least quarterly the beginning and ending net asset 
values for the period, all additions, withdrawals and redemptions, 
whether voluntary or involuntary, the net performance for the period, 
net of additions, withdrawals and redemptions, and the rate of return 
for the period. These requirements have been applied in practice such 
that multiple pages of small-type numerical tables, frequently 
including performance data not required by Commission rules, are 
presented, often mixing without differentiation the performance of 
trading vehicles similar to the pool offered and of vehicles different 
in material respects. Such performance presentations are voluminous and 
may give equal weight to relevant data and to data of secondary or 
marginal pertinence.
    The Commission is proposing a new summary format for presentation 
of all required past performance history.\29\ This format is intended 
to capture the most significant information concerning a pool's history 
in a reader-friendly, largely nontabular form, which would generally 
permit multiple performance track records to be provided on a single 
page. The proposed new format, which is set forth in Rule 4.25(a)(1)(i) 
for pools and Rule 4.25(a)(1)(ii) for accounts, calls for core 
information intended to convey relevant data in a condensed format. The 
capsule format for pools would set forth the date when the pool 
commenced trading, the aggregate gross capital subscriptions for the 
pool, and the pool's current net asset value. The ``largest monthly 
draw-down'' and ``worst continuous peak-to-valley draw-down'' are 
intended to show that material changes in rates of return may occur. 
Rates of return would also be included, on a monthly basis for the pool 
offered, and on an annual basis for other pools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\The only exception to the summary format presentation is 
that a CTA disclosure document would be required to present the 
performance of the program offered in the full format currently 
required by current Rule 4.31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ``largest monthly drawn-down'' and the ``worst continuous peak-
to-valley draw-down'' would demonstrate the significant one-month and 
sustained declines to which commodity pool returns may be subject. Both 
draw-down figures would be expressed as a percentage of the pool's net 
asset value. The largest monthly draw-down would indicate the largest 
net asset loss experienced by the pool in any calendar month and the 
month and year in which it occurred. The peak-to-valley draw-down would 
indicate the largest calendar month-to-calendar month continuous net 
asset loss experienced by the pool during any period and the months and 
year in which it occurred. Dating the monthly and peak-to-valley draw-
downs would permit participants to assess whether the losses were 
connected to market conditions by comparing the draw-downs of several 
pools. As explained in the rule, a peak-to-valley draw-down of 4 to 8-
91/25% would indicate that the peak-to-valley lasted from April to 
August of 1991 and resulted in a twenty-five percent draw-down of the 
pool's net asset value.
    The rate of return would be presented for each month for the pool 
offered and for each year for other pools. It would be computed on a 
monthly compounded basis in order that the rate of return for a given 
month will take into account the prior months' trading profits. Annual 
rates of return computed on a monthly compounded basis assume 
reinvestment of accrued profits and therefore the investment base on 
which rates of return are calculated is effectively adjusted by these 
amounts, presenting a more accurate picture of actual returns realized 
on an investment. Information currently required by Rule 4.21(a)(4) 
concerning additions, withdrawals and redemptions, the beginning and 
ending net asset values and the number of units outstanding at the end 
of each period at least for each quarter, would not be required.
    The proposed capsule format for CTA accounts would contain similar 
core information, i.e., the name of the CTA or other person trading the 
account and the name of the trading program; the date when the CTA 
began trading client funds and the date of inception of the program 
being disclosed; the number of accounts in the program; the total 
assets under the management of the CTA and in the trading program; the 
largest monthly and worst continuous peak-to-valley draw-downs for the 
program; and the annual and year-to-date rates of return. Registrants 
who compute rates of return for CTA programs on the basis permitted by 
Advisory 93-13 would continue to be required to state the actual and 
nominal account sizes, as required therein.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\But see note 23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The summary format is designed for presentation purposes only. CPOs 
and CTAs must continue to compute pool performance on the basis set 
forth in current Rule 4.21(a)(4)(ii) (proposed to be renumbered as Rule 
4.25(a)(6)), as interpreted by the Commission and to maintain records 
substantiating such computations in accordance with Rule 1.31.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\Among other things, Rule 1.31 requires all books and records 
to be kept for a period of five years and available for inspection 
by any representative of the Commission or the U.S. Department of 
Justice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An example of capsule past performance presentation follows. This 
table sets forth on a single page capsule past performance for eight 
pools.

                                                 Sample.--Capsule Performance of All Pools Operated by X                                                
                                                                 [As of March 2, 1994]                                                                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Current                                                       Rate of return               
                                                 Aggregate    total     Worst monthly     Worst continuous ---------------------------------------------
   Name of pool       Type of    Start date    subscription   NAV ($  percent draw-down    peak-to-valley                                       Year-to-
                       pool                    ($ x  1,000)     x                            draw-down      1989   1990   1991   1992   1993      date  
                                                             1,000)                                                                            (percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A; B...............   2, 3, 6     8/93; 10/89       9,101     20,701     *(1.09%) 12/93  *(1.09%) 10-12/93   6.8     8.9    9.6  11.2   12.6       0.51 
C..................   2, 4, 6            4/86       2,104      3,313      (11.70%) 4/90    (20.47%) 1-4/90   4.2     9.8    6.5   9.3    5.7      (9.08)
D..................   2, 3, 5            8/87       3,964      5,144     (10.13%) 11/91  (16.11%) 10-11/91   9.6     9.5    2.5   5.8    8.6      (0.28)
E..................   1, 3, 6            6/87         534        292       (9.86%) 9/93   (21.14%) 9-11/93   3.4     7.8    8.2   7.6   (5.2)     (2.98)
F..................   1, 4, 6            8/86         617        730      (11.73%) 7/93    (19.61%) 4-8/91  11.17    6.2    3.4  10.6    6.8       6.82 
G..................   1, 4, 5            1/90         931        379      (16.01%) 6/92    (40.81%) 5-8/92  (2.3)    4.3    6.2  (8.2)  13.9     (17.26)
H..................   1, 3, 6            9/91         278        N/A      (12.20%) 6/93    (28.41%) 1-6/89  (7.8)    6.3    2.3  (0.7)   8.1    N/A     
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Worst draw-down for any of the pools included in the composite.                                                                                        
Key to type of pool: 1--Private; 2--Public; 3--Multi-advisor; 4--Non-multi-advisor; 5--Limited risk; 6--Non-limited risk.                               

2. Pools With Three or More Years Operating History
    Current Rule 4.21(a)(4) requires disclosure of the performance of 
the pool offered and of its CTAs and their principals for all pools. If 
the pool offered has less than a twelve-month track record, the 
performance of the CPO and of each of its principals must also be 
disclosed. Under the proposed rules, past performance disclosure 
requirements would differ based on whether the pool had a three-year, 
rather than twelve-month, track record. Generally, where a pool has at 
least a three-year track record, the only performance required to be 
disclosed would be that of the pool offered.
    The Commission believes that, generally, where a pool has an 
extensive operational history, presentation of the pool's own past 
performance record should fulfill the objectives of past performance 
disclosure. If, however, the pool's historical track record occurred 
under materially different conditions, the track record of the pool 
alone may not be sufficient. For example, if the pool was essentially a 
proprietary trading vehicle investing a relatively small amount of 
funds contributed by third party sources, the track record generated 
may have little or no relevance to a publicly offered pool. To assure 
that a pool's three-year history was not acquired under circumstances 
in which the pool was essentially a proprietary trading vehicle, 
proposed Rule 4.25(b) would provide for past performance disclosure to 
be limited to that of the pool offered for pools that have traded 
commodity futures and option contracts for at least three years with no 
fewer than fifteen participants who are unaffiliated with the pool's 
CPO and in which no more than ten percent of the assets were 
contributed by the CPO. The pool's performance would be required to be 
disclosed for five full calendar years and year-to-date (or, if the 
pool had less than a five-year history, for the pool's entire operating 
history), in the specified capsule format with monthly rates of return. 
The CPO would be free to include additional performance records in 
compliance with the provision relating to voluntary information.
    The Commission requests comment as to whether the performance 
record of a pool with a three-year operating history is generally 
sufficient without supplementary performance data concerning the pool's 
CTAs or other pools operated by the CPO. The Commission also requests 
comment as to whether the offered pool's operating history should be 
considered for purposes of the three-year minimum if such history was 
acquired when the pool differed in some material respect from the pool 
as offered, for example, in cases in which the pool's CTA, types of 
interests traded or the trading program have been significantly 
modified or the pool was initially privately offered but is now offered 
to the public.
3. Pools With Less Than Three Years History
    As noted above, current Rule 4.21(a)(4) requires a pool disclosure 
document to disclose the performance of the pool offered, of each of 
the pool's CTAs and of each principal of the CTAs, and, if the pool 
offered has traded commodity interests for less than twelve months, the 
performance of the CPO and each of its principals.
    As discussed in the preceding section, the Commission is proposing 
to limit required performance disclosures to the performance of the 
pool offered if the pool has at least a three-year performance history. 
With respect to pools that have less than a three-year history, 
proposed Rule 4.25(c) would require presentation of the performance 
records of the pool offered, the CPO (or trading manager), the CPO's 
(or trading manager's) trading principals if the CPO (or trading 
manager) has less than a three-year history, and the performance of 
each ``major'' CTA and investee pool, i.e., CTAs allocated at least 
twenty-five percent of the pool's futures margins and commodity option 
premiums and investee pools allocated at least twenty-five percent of 
the assets of the pool offered.32 For CTAs allocated less than 
twenty-five percent of the pool's futures margins and commodity option 
premiums and investee pools allocated less than twenty-five percent of 
the pool's assets, the sole requirement would be to indicate any 
``adverse'' performance as defined in the rule. No disclosure would be 
required for CTAs allocated less than ten percent of the pool's futures 
margins and option premiums or investee pools allocated less than ten 
percent of the pool's assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\2The lack of prior trading history of the specified persons 
would be indicated by legends set forth in the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules would require that the performance history for 
the pool offered be presented before any other performance history in 
the disclosure document. The performance of pools similar to the pool 
offered would be presented after that of the pool offered, on a pool-
by-pool basis.
    The performance disclosure requirement of current Rule 4.21(a)(4) 
focuses on the past performance of the pool offered, its CTAs, 
principals of the CTAs and, if the pool has less than a year history, 
the CPO and each of its principals. As noted above, these requirements 
would be largely eliminated for pools with at least a three-year 
operating history. For pools with a shorter history, additional past 
performance records would be required to be disclosed. These 
requirements were devised to focus upon the performance of pools 
similar to the pool offered and of persons responsible for management 
of a significant portion of the offered pool's assets. Further, to the 
extent that performance of principals is required, unlike the current 
rule which requires disclosure of the performance of all principals, 
the proposed rule would require disclosure of the past performance of 
``trading principals'' only. A ``trading principal'' would be defined 
in proposed Rule 4.10(m) to mean a principal of a CPO or CTA who 
participates in making commodity interest trading decisions for a pool 
or client or who supervises, or has authority to allocate pool assets 
to, persons so engaged.
    The proposed rules also would take into account arrangements in 
which pools use trading managers to direct their trading.33 The 
term ``trading manager'' is defined in proposed Rule 4.10(j) as any 
person, other than the pool's CPO, with authority to allocate pool 
assets to CTAs or investee pools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\3Trading managers are CTAs and are required to be registered 
as such.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the practice of retaining trading managers to 
select and monitor the performance of CTAs and investee pools to which 
pool assets will be committed has become commonplace. CPOs seek to 
maximize pool returns by allocating pool assets based on analysis of 
the returns achieved by CTAs retained for the pool and investee pools 
in which the pool has invested as compared to those of other CTAs and 
investee pools, and in response to changing market conditions. CPOs 
frequently rely on trading managers to continuously review the 
performance of CTAs and investee pools and allocate and reallocate pool 
funds. Because the trading manager, rather than the CPO, conducts the 
asset allocation activities for the pool, the Commission believes that 
the principal focus of the performance disclosure for a pool in which a 
trading manager is responsible for allocating the assets should be on 
the trading manager, rather than the CPO. Thus, when a pool has a 
trading manager, the trading manager's performance would replace that 
of the CPO.
    With respect to CTAs, the proposed rules would require disclosure 
of the past performance of CTAs only where they manage twenty-five 
percent or more of the pool's futures and commodity option trading and 
thus would constitute ``major CTAs,'' as defined in proposed Rule 
4.10(k). The proposed rules also would require disclosure of past 
performance of investee pools constituting ``major investee pools, that 
is investee pools allocated twenty-five percent or more of the pool's 
assets. The term ``major CTA'' would be defined in Rule 4.10(k) to mean 
a CTA allocated or intended to be allocated twenty-five percent or more 
of the pool's initial margins for futures contracts and premiums for 
commodity options. Proposed Rule 4.10(l) would define ``major investee 
pool'' as an investee pool allocated or intended to be allocated at 
least twenty-five percent of the assets of a pool. These definitions 
are intended to include CTAs or investee pools to whom the CPO of a 
pool that has not commenced trading intends to make allocations at or 
above the specified thresholds. Similarly, CTAs and investee pools to 
whom the CPO of an operating pool intends to reallocate assets such 
that the allocations will total twenty-five percent or more under the 
margin or total asset standards also would be included.
    To further reduce the volume of performance data contained in the 
disclosure document, the proposed rules would eliminate the requirement 
to present performance data with respect to CTAs allocated less than 
twenty-five percent of the pool's initial margins and commodity option 
premiums and investee pools allocated less than twenty-five percent of 
the pool's assets and require only that ``adverse'' performance be 
disclosed as to CTAs allocated ten percent or more of the pool's 
initial futures margins and commodity option premiums and investee 
pools allocated ten percent or more of the pool's assets. ``Adverse 
performance'' would be defined in proposed Rule 4.25(a)(8) as an annual 
rate of return of one hundred basis points less than the ninety-day 
Treasury Bill rate on December 31 of the calendar year in which the 
performance occurred or the termination of any pool pursuant to a loss 
termination provision. To disclose adverse performance, the CPO would 
indicate the year in which the performance occurred, the rate of return 
for that year, and the name of the CPO, CTA or investee pool 
responsible for the performance. An indication of adverse performance 
would be required to be given for the pool's CPO (where the pool had a 
trading manager whose performance was disclosed in lieu of that of the 
CPO), any trading principal of the CPO or trading manager whose 
performance was not otherwise disclosed, any CTA, other than a major 
CTA, allocated at least ten percent of the pool's initial futures 
margins and commodity option premiums and any investee pool, other than 
a major investee pool, allocated at least ten percent of the assets of 
the pool offered and the trading principals of major CTAs and the CPOs 
of major investee pools that have no prior operating history. Proposed 
Rule 4.25(c)(3)(iii) would permit CPOs to provide capsule performance 
in lieu of giving an indication of adverse performance.
    Comment is requested concerning the proposed treatment of CTA and 
investee pool performance, including the definitions of major CTA and 
major investee pools. In particular, commenters may wish to address 
whether use of a twenty-five percent of futures margin or commodity 
premium benchmark as compared to twenty-five percent of total assets 
adequately reflects the relative risks of direct futures trading as 
compared to trading through vehicles which limit the risk of loss to 
the initial investment. Comment also is requested as to the definition 
of adverse performance, in particular, as to whether any additional 
benchmarks for identifying whether past performance is sufficiently 
``adverse'' to warrant disclosure would be appropriate. For example, 
should the adverse performance definition be revised to include a one-
month draw-down exceeding a specified percentage, e.g., twenty-five 
percent, of account equity traded pursuant to the trading program under 
which the CTA will trade for the offered pool.
4. Past Performance Disclosure in CTA Disclosure Documents
    CTA disclosure documents would be required to include the past 
performance of the CTA and its trading principals. The past performance 
of the program offered would be required to be disclosed in the full 
format currently required. For other programs, the CTA would be 
required to use the capsule format used by CPOs to present CTA past 
performance in pool disclosure documents.
5. Updating Past Performance Records
    Concurrently, Rule 4.22(a) is proposed to be revised by adding 
paragraph (a)(4) to require periodic account statements to include the 
names of all of the pool's CTAs and investee pools regardless of the 
amount of pool assets allocated to them. In addition, to provide a 
ready means of presenting the performance of newly added major CTAs and 
investee pools, account statements would be required to include the 
past performance of all CTAs and investee pools that are major CTAs and 
major investee pools as of the date of the statements and whose 
performance was not previously disclosed. Use of account statements to 
update major CTAs' and investee pools' performance records would 
provide a convenient means for CPOs to amend pool performance 
disclosures. In the event that the pool acquired a new major CTA or 
investee pool whose past performance had not previously been disclosed, 
the CPO would be required to notify pool participants of such event and 
provide the relevant performance records as required by proposed Rule 
4.26(c) (current Rule 4.21(b)),34 within twenty-one calendar days 
after the CPO knows or should know of this occurrence, whether by way 
of the account statement (if this would provide timely notice under the 
twenty-one day requirement) or by other similar means.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\4Rule 4.21(b) (proposed to be renumbered as Rule 4.26(c)) 
sets forth the requirements for amending pool disclosure documents 
to reflect a material change in the document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. Time Period for Which Past Performance Disclosure Would be Required
    Current Rule 4.21 generally requires past performance to be 
presented for a three-year period. However, the Commission is aware 
that some registrants nonetheless include longer performance periods in 
their disclosure documents for marketing purposes. The Commission 
believes that requiring performance to be disclosed for a period longer 
than three years will have the benefit of making performance 
disclosures more uniform and will provide a better picture of the 
evolution of performance over time, including positive and negative 
fluctuations in returns. In addition, under the proposed summary format 
for performance disclosure, lengthy tables to present performance data 
would not be required. Consequently, adoption of a five-year disclosure 
period would not result in any significant increase in the volume of 
performance disclosures. Accordingly, the Commission is proposing to 
increase the minimum time period for which performance would be 
disclosed from three to five years. CPOs may continue to provide 
additional performance disclosures provided the performance is 
calculated in compliance with proposed Rule 4.25 and is included in the 
document following the required performance disclosures as required by 
proposed Rule 4.24(v) for information voluntarily provided.
    A summary table of the proposed past performance disclosure 
requirements follows.

        Summary of Proposed Amendments to Performance Disclosure        
Pools with three or more   Performance of pool offered for up to five   
 years history.             calendar years and year-to-date (``YTD''),  
                            with monthly rates of return (``RORs'').    
Pools with less than       Performance of pool offered for life of pool 
 three years history.       (monthly RORs); statement if pool has no    
                            history.                                    
                           Performance of CPO's or trading manager's    
                            other pools and accounts (annual RORs).     
                           If CPO or trading manager has less than three
                            years history in trading same type of pool, 
                            performance of its principals (annual RORs).
                            Statement if no prior trading history of CPO
                            or trading manager and its principals.      
                           Performance of major investee pools (``IPs'')
                            (allocated at least 25% of pool assets) and 
                            major CTAs (allocated at least 25% of       
                            futures margins and option premiums).       
                            Statement if no prior history.              
                           Unless performance otherwise disclosed,      
                            indication of adverse performance of CPO,   
                            CPO's or trading manager's trading          
                            principals and IPs allocated 10% or more of 
                            the pool's assets and CTAs allocated 10% or 
                            more of the pool's futures margins and      
                            option premiums.                            

7. Composite Performance Presentations
    Rule 4.21(a)(4)(iv) currently permits the performance of pools 
operated by each person for whom performance is required to be 
disclosed to be presented on a composite basis provided that the 
performance of the pool offered is separately disclosed, the CPO 
describes how each composite was developed, and the composite is not 
misleading. Rule 4.31 also permits composite presentation of the 
performance of accounts directed by the CTA and each of its principals 
provided that material differences among the accounts and the manner in 
which the composite was developed are described.
    Composite presentations have the obvious advantage of reducing the 
volume of past performance data presented. However, composite 
presentations raise a number of regulatory concerns precisely because 
they supplant individualized presentations of potentially quite 
different types of pools and trading programs and may smooth or 
camouflage actual rates of return. Composite results not only fail to 
reflect differences among the pools and accounts whose results are 
presented but also merge potentially disparate trading results into 
average trading results and thus fail to reflect the actual dispersion 
of returns as well as the volatility of individual pools and accounts. 
For these reasons, the Commission considered prohibiting the use of 
composite performance data for pools as well as accounts.
    The Commission has carefully considered the benefits and 
disadvantages that may accrue from the use of composites and is 
proposing an approach designed to realize the benefits of reducing the 
volume of performance data created by the use of composites while 
reducing the potential for misleading result presentations. Under the 
proposal, past performance data for the pool offered and pools similar 
to the pool offered would be required to be separately disclosed. Pools 
of a different type from the pool offered would be permitted to be 
presented in composites with other pools of the same type, provided 
that such presentations would not be misleading. Pools would be 
considered to be of a different type or category if they differed in 
material respects. The proposed rule delineates several types of 
material distinctions among pools for this purpose, including the 
following: Pools privately offered pursuant to Regulation D of the 
Securities Act and public pools; pools traded with materially different 
leverages; limited risk pools and non-limited risk pools; pools using 
different commodity or trading methodologies; and multi-advisor 
pools35 and non-multi-advisor pools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\5Proposed Rule 4.10(h) would define the term ``multi-advisor 
pool'' as a pool in which no CTA is allocated twenty-five percent or 
more of the pool's aggregate initial margin and premiums for futures 
and commodity option contracts and no investee pool is allocated 
twenty-five percent or more of the pool's assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A pool could be included in a composite with another pool only if 
both pools were of the same type with respect to each of these 
categories. For example, a publicly offered non-multi-advisor pool 
could not be included in the same composite as a privately offered non-
multi-advisor pool and two limited risk pools that used different 
trading programs or materially different degrees of leverage could not 
be included in the same composite. Moreover, there may be instances in 
which even composites of pools of the same type may be misleading, such 
as where differences between the trading results of the pools are so 
great that a composite would materially distort their results. For 
example, two publicly offered multi-advisor pools with the same CTAs 
could show widely disparate results unless each CTA were allocated 
substantially the same portion of each pool's assets. Also, two single-
advisor pools with different CTAs may achieve very different results. 
The proviso in proposed Rule 4.25(a)(3)(ii) that results may be 
presented in composite form ``unless such presentation would be 
misleading'' is intended to assure that composites are carefully 
reviewed to protect against any material distortion that may result 
from these types of situations.
    Proposed Rules 4.25(a)(6) and 4.34(a)(2) would require that records 
substantiating the performance data set forth in CPO and CTA documents, 
respectively, and documenting the underlying calculations be maintained 
in accordance with Rule 1.31. Naturally, this requirement also applies 
with respect to composite presentations. Pursuant to proposed Rule 
4.25(a)(3)(ii), a CPO must be prepared to justify the inclusion in a 
composite of the pool results contained therein.
    To present capsule performance of pools in a composite, the CPO 
would name all pools included in the composite, set forth the 
categories of these pools (which, as discussed above, would be the same 
for each pool in the composite), including at a minimum the categories 
specified in proposed Rule 4.25(a)(3)(iii), and specify the dates on 
which each pool commenced trading. The aggregate gross capital 
subscriptions would be the total subscriptions for all pools in the 
composite. The draw-down figures would be the worst experienced by any 
one of the pools included in the composite and the rate of return would 
be the average rate of return for all pools included. The sample 
capsule past performance presentation table set forth above following 
the discussion on capsule performance includes an example of 
performance presentation for pools (pools A and B, in the example) 
whose performance is disclosed in composite form.
    The Commission requests comment as to whether the pool categories 
delineated in proposed Rule 4.25(a)(3)(iii) relating to composite 
presentations are appropriate for purposes of limiting composite 
presentations and as to whether any additional categories of pools 
should be identified for this purpose. Comment is also requested as to 
the costs and benefits of a general requirement of separate rather than 
composite presentation of pool performance in lieu of a qualified 
approach of the nature proposed.
    Proposed Rule 4.34(a)(5) would permit CTAs to include in a 
composite all accounts traded pursuant to the same trading program, 
provided that such a presentation would not be misleading and provided 
that the CTA describes how the composite was calculated. The term 
``trading program'' would be defined in the rule as ``a trading 
strategy differentiated from others by commodity trading methodology, 
degree of risk or degree of leverage.'' Comment is requested as to the 
necessity and feasibility of providing a more detailed definition of 
the term ``trading program'' or additional guidance as to how trading 
programs can be differentiated.
8. Proprietary Trading Results
    Use of proprietary trading results in soliciting customer accounts 
is a practice which has long been of concern to the Commission. CPOs 
and CTAs may trade proprietary funds for a variety of purposes, 
including to test a new trading strategy before implementing it for 
customer funds or to establish a track record prior to trading customer 
funds. However, proprietary accounts may be traded in a different 
manner, for example, more aggressively, using higher leverage and 
assuming greater risk, than customer accounts. Also, proprietary 
accounts are usually not subject to the same fee schedule as customer 
accounts. Naturally, no management or incentive fee would apply where a 
CTA traded its own account, and clearing fees may be waived or reduced 
if the account is cleared by an affiliate. In addition, where 
proprietary and customer assets are combined for purposes of 
performance presentations, the total amount of assets under management 
is inflated and conceals the actual amount of customer funds being 
traded. For these reasons, proprietary trading results may, in many 
cases, be of little relevance to a prospective pool participant or CTA 
client and actually misleading in others.
    Currently, the Commission's rules do not specifically address the 
use of proprietary trading results in disclosure documents. However, in 
reviewing disclosure documents, because the rules require performance 
of ``directed accounts'' and because of the prohibition against 
misleading disclosures, Division staff have advised that any 
proprietary trading results provided must be clearly labeled as such 
and presented in a separate table to reduce the potential for 
misleading investors. The staff also has required that if fees, 
expenses, commissions, margin-to-equity ratios, or any other item 
pertaining to the proprietary trading is materially different from that 
relevant to the trading program offered to clients, the registrant must 
``pro forma'' such items to correspond to those in the program offered.
    In reviewing the Part 4 rules, the Commission considered 
prohibiting the use of proprietary results in CPO and CTA disclosure 
documents given the potentially misleading nature of such presentations 
and their at best marginal relevance in the non-proprietary trading 
context. However, the Commission is aware that proprietary trading 
results may be the only performance results available to some new 
traders to present to customers as evidence of trading experience. 
Accordingly, rather than prohibiting disclosure of proprietary trading 
results, the Commission is proposing to permit such disclosure under 
appropriate restrictions. Under proposed Rule 4.25(a)(9), pools and 
accounts in which the pool operator, trading manager, CTA or other 
person providing services to the pool owned or controlled fifty percent 
or more of the beneficial interest could not be included in disclosure 
documents unless prominently labeled as such and set forth following 
all required performance and non-performance disclosures. The 
requirement that proprietary results follow all required disclosures, 
rather than just the required performance disclosures, would reflect 
the peripheral and potentially misleading nature of proprietary trading 
results and reduce the potential for confusion of proprietary and 
customer trading results.36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\6The NFA Special Committee also reached the conclusion that 
proprietary results should be displayed separately and labeled as 
such and that adjustments for fee differentials and other 
differences should be made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

9. Pro Forma, Hypothetical and Extracted Results
    The Commission also recognizes the potential for inappropriate use 
of certain other types of performance data. These include hypothetical, 
pro forma and extracted results. Hypothetical results are results 
calculated based upon the application of a given program to historical 
market prices and purport to present results that could have been 
obtained in trading a particular program during the specified 
historical period. Thus, hypothetical results are based on hindsight 
and can be readily manipulated. Rule 4.41 requires that any 
presentation of simulated or hypothetical trading results be 
accompanied by a specified cautionary statement describing the limited 
value of such results. In its rule submission, the NFA notes that a 
number of NFA disciplinary cases have involved NFA members who 
advertise hypothetical results to solicit unsophisticated customers. 
When the trading program is unsuccessful and causes substantial 
customer losses, the program is abandoned in favor of a new program for 
which hypothetical results, based on hindsight, are presented. The 
actual performance of customers whose accounts were traded under the 
prior program may never be disclosed.
    Pro forma results present trading results with adjustments to 
reflect certain factors, such as a particular fee schedule or degree of 
leverage, to permit easier comparison with other types of results. In 
its rule submission, the NFA notes that in some instances the use of 
pro forma results may have some of the same limitations as hypothetical 
results. For example, some CPOs may use pro forma data to present 
results that a multi-advisor pool could have achieved had assets been 
allocated differently among CTAs than occurred in actuality. As the NFA 
Special Committee concluded, ``[t]his use of pro forma results reflects 
the same sort of hindsight that hypothetical results do and invites the 
same sort of abuse.''
    Extracted performance results isolate a single component of a 
trading strategy for presentation to customers, and although based on 
actual results, are subject to manipulation as they may 
disproportionately emphasize a small portion of the overall strategy.
    Although the Commission believes that the use of pro forma, 
hypothetical and extracted results must be closely scrutinized, it has 
determined not to prohibit them at the present time. Instead, like 
other disclosures voluntarily provided, the disclosure of these types 
of results would be subject to such restrictions as may be imposed 
under the rules of a registered futures association and to the 
Commission's general antifraud prohibitions. NFA's proposed Compliance 
Rule 2-29(c) would strictly limit the use of hypothetical results in 
promotional material, except in promotional material directed 
exclusively to qualified eligible participants, as defined in CFTC Rule 
4.7(a)(1)(ii). NFA's proposed interpretation of Compliance Rule 2-13 
would permit pro forma performance histories solely for the purpose of 
adjusting performance presentations to the same fee structure as that 
of the pool or program offered. No pro forma results which reflect a 
hindsight analysis, such as to show results a multi-advisor pool could 
have achieved using a different allocation of assets among CTAs, would 
be permitted. Extracted results would only be permitted to be presented 
based on the percentage of net asset value actually committed to the 
particular component extracted.
10. Voluntary Performance Disclosures
    Pursuant to proposed Rule 4.24(v), disclosures, including 
performance disclosures, other than those required by CFTC rules must 
follow all relevant required disclosures in the disclosure document\37\ 
and may not be misleading in their content or presentation or 
inconsistent with required disclosures.\38\ Performance disclosures 
voluntarily provided could have misleading effects if favorable 
performance data are given undue prominence. For example, if the 
performance of two pools other than the offered pool operated by the 
CPO were voluntarily provided, it may be misleading to show the 
favorable performance of Pool 1 but not the negative performance of 
Pool 2 or to show the performance of Pool 1 in capsule format and that 
of Pool 2 in full format. It may also be misleading to show the 
performance of a pool in capsule format for year one and in full format 
for year two or to show the pool's performance for 1991 and not 1992. 
Generally, inclusion of voluntarily provided performance data should be 
made on a result-neutral basis that results in inclusion of all similar 
data. For example, the past performance of two CTAs allocated an equal 
portion of a pool's assets should either be included or omitted, as 
should the performance of the CPO's other pools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\As noted above, proprietary trading results would be 
required to follow all required disclosures.
    \38\See general discussion on voluntary disclosures, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also notes that the practice of advertising the 
performance of a particular CTA with an excellent track record to 
attract prospective participants and shortly thereafter reallocating 
pool assets to another CTA, a practice commonly referred to as ``bait-
and-switch,'' is misleading and that performance voluntarily provided 
for this purpose is prohibited under general antifraud standards.
11. Cautionary Legends
    The proposed rules would continue to require the inclusion of 
certain legends alerting pool participants and prospective participants 
to the lack of experience of the CPO (or trading manager), the pool's 
CTAs and their principals. However, these legends have been revised and 
substantially streamlined. Under current Rule 4.21, these legends are 
required to recite the relevant performance disclosure requirement. For 
example, Rule 4.21(4)(i)(B) requires a statement that the CFTC requires 
disclosure of the performance of the pool offered and of other pools 
operated by the CPO and its principals and that neither the CPO nor its 
principals have any prior performance history.\39\ The proposed rules 
would eliminate the prescribed statements concerning CFTC rules, with 
the effect of deleting the bulk of the bold-faced disclosures and of 
focusing attention upon the primary point to be conveyed, i.e., the 
fact that the CPO and its principals have not previously operated any 
commodity pools. Thus, the legend relating to the lack of trading 
history of a pool would read: ``THIS POOL HAS NOT COMMENCED TRADING AND 
DOES NOT HAVE ANY PERFORMANCE HISTORY'',\40\ and the legend relating to 
the lack of experience of the CPO and its trading principals would 
read: ``NEITHER THIS POOL OPERATOR NOR ANY OF ITS TRADING PRINCIPALS 
HAS PREVIOUSLY OPERATED ANY OTHER POOLS OR TRADED ANY OTHER 
ACCOUNTS.''\41\ Similar legends would be required, where applicable, 
with respect to trading managers and major investee pools. To further 
reduce the bulk of these disclosures, where several legends may be 
required, the proposed rules provide an alternate legend consolidating 
the several statements that would otherwise be required. For example, 
the proposed rules would require a CTA disclosure document to disclose, 
if true, the lack of experience of the CTA and its principals. If the 
CTA had no prior experience, the following legend should be included: 
``THIS TRADING ADVISOR PREVIOUSLY HAS NOT DIRECTED ANY ACCOUNTS.'' The 
following legend would be used for trading principals: ``NONE OF THE 
TRADING PRINCIPALS OF THIS TRADING ADVISOR HAS PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED ANY 
ACCOUNTS.'' If neither the CTA nor any of its principals had prior 
trading experience, rather than displaying these two separate legends, 
the following single sentence would be included: ``NEITHER THIS TRADING 
ADVISOR NOR ITS TRADING PRINCIPALS HAVE PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED ANY 
ACCOUNTS.'' These proposals are designed to reduce disclosures that 
complicate and lengthen disclosure documents while preserving 
disclosures that may be important to prospective investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\The entire legend reads as follows: ``THE COMMODITY FUTURES 
TRADING COMMISSION REQUIRES THE OPERATOR OF A POOL THAT HAS TRADED 
COMMODITY INTERESTS FOR LESS THAN 12 MONTHS TO DISCLOSE THE ACTUAL 
PERFORMANCE RECORD OF THE POOL FOR ITS ENTIRE OPERATING HISTORY AND 
THE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD OF EACH OTHER POOL OPERATED BY THE 
POOL OPERATOR AND ITS PRINCIPALS. YOU SHOULD NOTE THAT THIS POOL 
OPERATOR AND ITS PRINCIPALS PREVIOUSLY HAVE NOT OPERATED ANY OTHER 
COMMODITY POOL.''
    \40\Proposed Rule 4.25(c)(1)(ii).
    \41\Proposed Rule 4.25(c)(2)(iii). Similarly, the legend 
concerning major CTAs who have never directed accounts would read: 
``(name of CTA), A COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR THAT HAS DISCRETIONARY 
AUTHORITY OVER (percentage of the pool's aggregate initial futures 
margin and commodity option premiums allocated to that CTA) OF THE 
POOL'S DIRECT FUTURES AND COMMODITY OPTION TRADING HAS NOT 
PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED ANY ACCOUNTS.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A legend indicating that ``PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT PREDICTIVE OF 
FUTURE PERFORMANCE'' would be required to precede any performance 
presentation, whether required or given voluntarily.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\Numerous studies have shown the general lack of predictive 
value of past performance. See, e.g., Irwin, The Predictability of 
Managed Futures Returns: Evidence from Multiple CTA Public Commodity 
Pools, Working Paper Version, Ohio State University, Department of 
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology (April 1992) 
(unpublished). See also Futures Pools' Returns Are a Far Cry From 
Their Brochures and Prospectuses Wall St. J., Oct 2, 1992.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

12. Order of Disclosures
    For pools with an operating history shorter than three years, the 
performance of the pool offered would be required to be the first 
performance record presented in the disclosure document. Performance 
data for pools of the same category as the pool offered would be 
required to appear after the performance history of the pool offered 
and to be presented on a pool-by-pool, that is non-composite, basis. 
Pools of a different category from the pool offered would be required 
to follow the performance of pools of the same category as the pool 
offered. As discussed above, for purposes of applying the requirement 
that composite presentations be used only for pools of the same 
category, the rule would identify a number of categories of pools.
    The Commission believes that the streamlined past performance 
disclosure requirements should substantially increase the clarity and 
readability of past performance disclosures.
    The Commission requests comment on all aspects of Rule 4.25 and, in 
particular, on the adequacy of the summary performance format to 
provide a basis upon which a prospective pool participant may make an 
informed judgment with respect to past performance results; whether a 
three-year history is a sufficient basis for eliminating any 
requirement for disclosure of past performance other than that of the 
pool offered; and whether the ten percent allocation thresholds for 
major CTAs and investee pools, below which no performance disclosures 
would be required, is appropriate. The Commission also requests comment 
as to whether past performance presentations would provide more 
meaningful information if they were required to include rates of return 
on a risk-adjusted basis, that is, reduced by the relevant Treasury 
Bill rate or comparable interest figure, or to break out trading 
results from passive interest income.

B. Section 4.24--Required General Disclosures

    Under the proposal, non-performance disclosure requirements would 
be set forth in Rule 4.24.
1. Table of Contents and Order of Required Information
    As noted above, a primary objective of this proposal is to foster 
clarity and comprehensibility in the disclosure of relevant information 
to prospective pool participants. To this end, in addition to 
eliminating certain required disclosures, the Commission is proposing 
that certain information be presented in a required sequence which 
would be specified in proposed Rules 4.24(a) through (d). Like current 
Rule 4.21, proposed Rule 4.24 would require that a cautionary 
statement, i.e., a statement that the CFTC has not passed upon the 
merits of the pool investment or the adequacy of the disclosure 
document, and any other information required under any other applicable 
federal or state laws and regulations, appear on the cover page of the 
disclosure document. The risk disclosure statement specified in Rule 
4.24(b) would be required to be set forth immediately after these 
disclosures. The next item in the disclosure document would be a table 
of contents.\43\ Prior to any detailed disclosures with respect to the 
pool and persons involved in operating and trading the assets of the 
pool, in what would constitute the ``forepart'' of the disclosure 
document, a prospective participant would find very basic information 
concerning the pool.\44\ This information would include the name and 
address of the pool and CPO; the type of pool being offered, i.e., 
whether the pool is privately offered pursuant to section 4(2) of the 
Securities Act of 1933, a multi-advisor pool\45\, or a limited risk 
pool\46\; a statement whether the pool is continuously offered or the 
closing date of the offering; the date of the disclosure document; and 
the ``break-even point'' for the pool, that is, the trading profit that 
the pool must realize in its first year for a participant to recoup its 
initial investment. The break-even point would provide a simple 
illustration of the costs of investing in the pool and facilitate 
comparisons among pools.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\Rule 4.21 currently does not require a table of contents. 
However, most disclosure documents reviewed by the Division contain 
such a table. Further, Form S-1, the form most frequently used to 
register pool offerings with the SEC, requires ``a reasonably 
detailed table of contents showing the subject matter of the various 
sections or subdivisions of the prospectus and the page number on 
which each section or subdivision begins.'' See Item 502(g) of 
Regulation S-K, 17 CFR 229.502(g), incorporated by reference into 
Item 2 of Form S-1, 17 CFR 239.11. The Commission believes that a 
table of contents should contribute to making the disclosure 
document ``user-friendly''.
    \44\The cover page and forepart of CTA disclosure documents 
would be organized in a similar fashion and a table of contents 
would also be required.
    \45\Proposed Rule 4.10(h) would define a ``multi-advisor pool'' 
as a pool in which no CTA is allocated twenty-five percent or more 
of the pool's aggregate initial futures margins and commodity option 
premiums and no investee pool is allocated twenty-five percent or 
more of the pool's total assets.
    \46\Proposed Sec. 4.10(i) would define the term ``limited risk 
pool'' as a pool designed to limit the loss of the initial 
investment of its participants.
    \47\The break-even point is discussed in greater detail in the 
fees and expense section, infra. The break-even point would be 
required to account for hidden costs such as costs associated with 
investments in investee pools. In multi-advisor pools the potential 
consequences of incentive fees being calculated advisor-by-advisor 
should also be a disclosed risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission considered whether a particular order for all 
required information should be mandated in order to ``standardize'' the 
entire format of disclosure documents but determined to propose only 
the limited sequence requirements discussed above at this time. 
However, the Commission requests comment on the appropriateness and 
desirability of mandating that all required information be presented in 
a specified order to foster clarity in and comparability of disclosure 
documents, ease of regulatory review, and development of compliance 
guidance or instructions.
2. Voluntary Disclosures
    To address concerns that in many cases the disclosure process fails 
to achieve its intended purpose due to the high volume of information 
included in the disclosure document, the Commission is proposing a 
format for disclosure documents under which ``voluntary'' disclosures, 
i.e., those not required by Commission rules48 or those of other 
regulators, would be required to be placed in the disclosure document 
after all relevant required disclosures. Proposed Rule 4.24(v) would 
require all information, other than that required by the Commission, 
the antifraud provisions of the Act, and any federal or state 
securities laws and regulations, to appear following the related 
required disclosures. Such ``voluntary information'' could not be 
misleading in content or presentation or inconsistent with required 
disclosures. In addition, voluntary information would be subject to the 
antifraud provisions of the Act and the regulations thereunder and to 
rules regarding the use of promotional material promulgated by a 
registered futures association pursuant to section 17(j) of the Act. 
This format is designed to accommodate the apparent desire of some CPOs 
and CTAs to include in disclosure documents information that is not 
required under the Commission's rules or those of other regulators, 
while assuring that core disclosures are given due prominence. 
Naturally, CPOs and CTAs would continue to be subject to the antifraud 
prohibitions of sections 4b and 4o of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 6b and 
6o,49 with respect to all disclosures, including disclosures 
voluntarily provided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\8CFTC-required disclosures include information required by 
Rules 4.21(h) (proposed to be renumbered as Rule 4.24(w)) for CPOs 
and 4.31(g) (proposed to be renumbered as Rule 4.33(o) for CTAs. 
These rules require CPOs and CTAs to disclose all material 
information to existing and prospective pool participants and 
clients even if the information is not specifically required by 
Commission rules.
    \4\9Generally, section 4b of the Act prohibits fraud in 
connection with the making of any contract of sale of any commodity 
for future delivery. Section 4o of the Act prohibits CPOs, CTAs and 
their associated persons from employing any device, scheme, or 
artifice to defraud a pool participant, prospective pool participant 
or client and from engaging in any transaction, practice or course 
of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon such 
participant or client. In addition, CPOs, CTAs and their associated 
persons are precluded from representing or implying that they have 
been sponsored, recommended or approved by the United States or by 
any agency or officer thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Investee Pools
    The proposed disclosure framework specifically addresses 
disclosures concerning investee pools. As discussed in the performance 
section, for purposes of past performance disclosures, investee pools 
would be treated comparably to CTAs, i.e., the scope of performance 
disclosure required would be based on the amount of assets of the 
offered pool committed to the investee pool. However, a different 
benchmark for applying the twenty-five percent (as used in the major 
investee pool definition) and ten percent (for adverse performance 
disclosure to be required) thresholds is used for investee pools in 
light of the fact that investments in other pools generally expose the 
pool only to loss of the initial investment and that the full amount of 
the investment is required to be paid at the inception of the 
investment. The relative importance of investee pools to prospective 
pool participants is thus more appropriately determined by reference to 
the proportion of the pool's total assets invested in the investee 
pool. The proposal would streamline other investee pool disclosures to 
obviate the need for CPOs to substantially incorporate in the document 
the contents of each investee pool's disclosure document.50 Non-
performance disclosure requirements relating to investee pools also 
would be tailored to take into account the relative importance of the 
investee pool to the offered pool, as measured by the amount of assets 
of the pool offered allocated to it. Thus, no disclosures would be 
required for investee pools allocated less than ten percent of the 
assets of the pool offered and disclosures with respect to other 
investee pools would be limited based on the proportion of the pool's 
assets allocated to them. Specifically, with respect to each investee 
pool allocated at least ten percent of the assets of the pool offered, 
the CPO also would be required to disclose its name and that of its CPO 
and its principals and any conflicts of interest on the part of the 
investee pool's CPO in respect of the offered pool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\0See note 20 supra and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to major investee pools, i.e., those allocated twenty-
five percent or more of the assets of the offered pool, the CPO would 
be required to disclose the business background of, material litigation 
against, and any ownership in the pool offered on the part of its CPO 
and its principals. In addition, the use of proceeds, risk factors, 
fees and expense, and redemption sections of the document would call 
for specific information relative to investments in investee pools. 
Risk disclosure relative to investee pools would be required because 
investments in investee pools may create both the risks inherent in the 
investee pool's own investments and liquidity risks due to restrictions 
upon redemption of the investment in the investee pool. Fees and 
expenses may accrue at each level of a multi-tier structure and should 
be disclosed. Investments in investee pools with redemption periods 
different from those of the pool offered or with minimum ``lock-in'' 
provisions51 may affect the ability of that pool to promptly honor 
redemption requests from its participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\1Certain pools lock in initial investments for a specified 
period before allowing any redemptions. There are no rules requiring 
availability of redemption of pool interests in very short 
timeframes as for investment companies, hence the added importance 
of volatility disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission requests comment concerning the proposed treatment 
of investee pools. In particular, commenters are invited to address any 
special public policy or disclosure considerations presented by tiered 
investment structures by means of which a commodity pool can, in 
effect, appropriate the value of a second fund's management by 
investing all or a portion of its funds in the second fund. The 
Commission also requests comment concerning whether any additional 
protections, other than disclosure of applicable fees, are appropriate 
in light of the ``layering'' of fees that typically occurs at each 
level of a fund of funds structure.
4. Risk Disclosure Statement
    Rule 4.21 currently requires that disclosure documents include a 
prescribed bold-face statement alerting prospective pool participants 
to the risks involved in participating in a pool. This statement does 
not specifically address the risks of trading foreign futures or 
foreign option contracts. The risks attributable to foreign futures and 
foreign options were originally required to be addressed by a special 
disclosure statement, set forth in part 30 of the Commission's 
regulations, which generally governs transactions in foreign futures 
and foreign options.52 Thus, a CPO offering a pool expected to 
trade foreign and domestic futures or options was required to include 
in the disclosure document the Rule 4.21 risk disclosure statement, 
which does not refer to foreign futures or options, and the Rule 30.6 
foreign futures and options risk disclosure statement. However, Rule 
1.55, the basic risk disclosure requirement applicable to FCMs and IBs 
opening accounts for domestic futures and option contracts, was 
recently amended to consolidate the required disclosures concerning 
foreign futures and options into the domestic risk disclosure 
statement, and the separate Rule 30.6(a) disclosure statement was 
eliminated.53 Consequently, under the revised Rules 1.55 and 30.6, 
CPOs and CTAs offering pools and accounts, respectively, which may 
engage in foreign futures and option transactions would be required to 
include the new consolidated Rule 1.55 risk disclosure statement as 
well as the part 4 risk disclosure statement in the disclosure 
document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\2The Rule 30.6(a) statement was required to be provided by 
FCMs and IBs to clients opening foreign futures or foreign option 
accounts and, pursuant to Rule 30.6(b), by CPOs and CTAs trading 
foreign contracts for their pool or clients.
    \5\358 FR 17495 (April 5, 1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is proposing to address the potential for 
duplicative disclosure created by the recent rule revisions and to 
eliminate the necessity for providing two prescribed risk disclosure 
statements by revising the part 4 risk disclosure statements for CPOs 
and CTAs to address the risks of foreign as well as domestic 
transactions. Rule 30.6(b) would be revised to cross-reference the part 
4 statement. In addition, the terms ``domestic'' and ``foreign'' 
previously used to refer to contract markets or exchanges in foreign 
jurisdictions are proposed to be replaced with the terms ``United 
States'' and ``non-United States'' to avoid confusion in the context of 
offerings in non-United States jurisdictions to non-United States 
participants for whom the term ``foreign'' does not mean ``non-United 
States''.54 Rule 1.55 would also be amended to provide that pools 
need not be treated as customers for the purposes of delivery of the 
risk disclosure statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\4This discussion also applies generally to CTA disclosure 
documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Business Background
    Rule 4.21(a)(2) currently requires disclosure of the business 
backgrounds of the pool's CPO and CTA, and their principals. This 
disclosure requirement would be streamlined by: (1) Eliminating the 
requirement to disclose business backgrounds of CTAs except those of 
major CTAs, i.e., CTAs allocated at least twenty-five percent of the 
fund's futures margins and commodity option premiums; and (2) limiting 
the requirement to disclose business backgrounds of principals55 
of CPOs and CTAs to those principals ``who participate in making 
trading or operational decisions for the pool or who supervise those so 
engaged.''56 Comment is requested as to whether the business 
backgrounds of all principals, even those who hold a passive ownership 
interest in the CPO, should continue to be required to be disclosed. 
The business backgrounds of trading managers, who represent a subset of 
CTAs, and their principals who participate in making trading or 
operational decisions or supervise persons so engaged would also be 
required to be disclosed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\5Pursuant to current Rule 4.10(e), the term ``principal'' 
includes, with respect to an entity, a sole proprietor, general 
partner, officer or director, or person occupying a similar status 
or performing similar functions, having the power, directly or 
indirectly, to exercise a controlling influence over the activities 
of the entity. Holders and beneficial owners of at least ten percent 
of the CPO or CTA and persons who contributed at least ten percent 
of the CPO's or CTA's capital are also included.
    \5\6All principals would continue to be required to be named in 
the disclosure document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. Principal Risk Factors
    As noted above, current Rule 4.21(a)(17)(ii) requires the 
inclusion, at the front of the disclosure document, of a ``boiler-
plate'' risk disclosure statement that describes generically the risks 
of pool investments. Proposed Rule 4.24(g) would require, in addition 
to this required disclosure, a discussion designed to address risk 
factors specific to the pool offered. This discussion would address the 
volatility of the pool investment as compared to investments in other 
types of trading vehicles and other risks relating to the particular 
trading program to be followed, such as risks resulting from 
concentration of investments in particular commodities or contracts or 
from trading foreign contracts that are subject to currency rate 
fluctuations. Risks relative to transactions in off-exchange 
instruments, e.g., counterparty creditworthiness risks,57 or to 
the lack of relevant experience of the CPO or CTAs should also be 
addressed. The Commission believes that a succinct ``plain English'' 
discussion of the risks of the investment being offered would be highly 
material to the prospective participant's evaluation of the proposed 
investment and that this type of disclosure warrants particular 
attention when complex over-the-counter transactions are contemplated. 
Establishment of an express requirement for disclosure of principal 
risk factors essentially codifies disclosures that would likely be 
required under the specific requirements of existing rules or as 
material information.58
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\7These risks may differ materially from those entailed in 
exchange-traded futures and option transactions, which are backed by 
clearing organization guarantees, daily marking-to-market and 
settlement, and segregation and minimum capital requirements 
applicable to intermediaries. Transactions entered directly between 
two counterparties generally do not benefit from such protections 
and expose the parties to the risk of counterparty default.
    \5\8This requirement is consistent with SEC requirements for 
public offerings and investment company offerings. See, e.g., Item 3 
of Form S-1, which requires a discussion of the principal factors 
that make the offering speculative or one of high risk and Item 4(c) 
of Form N-1A which requires a brief discussion of the ``principal 
risk factors associated with investment in Registrant, including 
factors peculiar to the Registrant as well as those generally 
attendant to investment in an investment company with investment 
policies and objectives similar to Registrant's.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission welcomes comment as to whether additional guidance 
should be given in the rule as to the types of risk factors that should 
be discussed and as to any specific factors that should be identified 
in this context.
7. Use of Proceeds
    Under current Rule 4.21(a)(1)(viii), the pool operator must 
describe the types of commodity interests that the pool is expected to 
trade and any restrictions or limitations on such trading established 
by the CPO. Current Rule 4.21(a)(9) requires a description of the 
manner in which the pool will fulfill its margin requirements and of 
the form in which non-margin funds will be held. The nature of non-cash 
items must be described and the person to whom any income generated by 
such items will be paid must be identified. Taken together, Rules 
4.21(a)(1)(viii) and (a)(9) call for information concerning all types 
of trading and investments in which the pool is expected to engage. As 
a result, under current rules, CPOs generally provide a description of 
the overall trading activities of the pool, such that the full range of 
transactions, whether in securities, commodity interests or other types 
of interests, is disclosed.
    Under the proposal, current Rules 4.21(a)(1)(viii) and 4.21(a)(9) 
would be consolidated into Rule 4.24(h) under the caption ``Use of 
Proceeds''59 and revised to better reflect changes in the nature 
of funds management. Proposed Rule 4.24(h) would require the 
description of the pool's trading60 to include not only 
transactions in commodity interests but also any other types of 
interests in which the pool is expected to trade. With respect to pool 
funds that are not deposited as margin or held in cash or cash 
equivalents, the proposed rule would require disclosure of the nature 
of such property, for example, whether it consists of securities listed 
on a national securities exchange, bonds, commercial paper or interests 
in commodity pools, whether such property is subject to state or 
federal regulation or to regulation by a foreign government, and any 
investment rating applicable to such property. The proposed rule also 
would require the CPO to indicate the type of custodian, e.g., bank, 
broker-dealer or other entity, which will hold property not deposited 
as margin or option premiums and the jurisdiction where held, if other 
than the United States. The Commission believes that the proposed use 
of proceeds provision should provide a more coherent statement of the 
matters called for by current requirements in a manner that is 
consistent with current practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\9Captions are proposed to be added to increase ease of 
reference to the rules.
    \6\0The proposed rule would also call specifically for a 
description of the trading program that will be followed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. Fees and Expenses
    Rule 4.21(a)(7) currently requires a description of the expenses 
that the CPO knows or should know have been incurred in the past year 
or will be incurred in the current year. Expenses required to be 
disclosed include, without limitation, fees for management, trading 
advice, brokerage commissions, legal advice, accounting and 
organizational services. Rule 4.21(a)(14) requires disclosure of fees 
and commissions paid in connection with solicitations for the pool. 
Proposed new Rule 4.24(i) would combine the requirements of Rule 4.21 
(a)(7) and (a)(14) to provide in a single section of the disclosure 
document a complete discussion of costs incurred by the pool for all 
purposes.
    The proposed provision relating to fees and expenses (Rule 4.24(i)) 
requires a detailed description of fees and expenses, including certain 
fees and expenses that are not specifically enumerated in current Rule 
4.21 but that constitute material disclosures and are thus required to 
be disclosed.61 Thus, clearance fees and fees paid to national 
exchanges and self-regulatory organizations, incentive fees, including 
any disproportionate share of profits allocated to the CPO, i.e., a 
right of the CPO to receive a greater than pro-rata share of the pool's 
profits, and fees and expenses incurred as a result of investments in 
investee pools and other investment vehicles or to fund the guarantee 
of a limited risk pool, would be required to be set forth specifically 
in the table. In addition, the proposed rule would clarify that 
disclosure of fees paid in connection with solicitations for the pool 
must include trailing commissions as well as any type of benefit that 
may accrue to persons engaged in such solicitations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\1See note 48.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Expenses, fees and commissions are assessed based on various 
factors. For example, brokerage fees are assessed based on a round-turn 
commission, management fees may be based on the net asset value of the 
pool's assets, incentive fees on trading profits, and sales commissions 
may be charged as a percentage of the proceeds of the offering. A 
description of each separate fee and expense may not, however, convey a 
clear understanding of the actual portion of each pool participation 
absorbed by fees and expenses. As the risk disclosure statement 
required by current Rule 4.21(a)(17) indicates, ``in some cases, 
commodity pools are subject to substantial charges for management, 
advisory and brokerage fees,'' and ``it may be necessary for those 
pools that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading 
profits to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.''
    To foster a better understanding of the nature of those costs and 
their impact upon the investment, the proposal would require, in 
addition to a narrative description, a tabular presentation of fees and 
expenses from all sources setting forth how the break-even point for 
the pool is calculated (``break-even analysis''). As noted supra, the 
``break-even point'' for the pool, i.e., the trading profit that a pool 
or trading program must realize in its first year to equal all fees and 
expenses such that a participant or client will recoup its initial 
investment,62 would be required to be set forth as a single figure 
in the forepart of the pool disclosure document, expressed as a 
percentage of a unit of initial investment. The break-even analysis 
would provide an explanation, in tabular form, of how the break-even 
point is calculated, taking into account all fees, expenses and 
commissions applicable to the pool. The proposal would require the 
break-even analysis to be prepared in accordance with rules promulgated 
by a registered futures association pursuant to section 17(j) of the 
Act. As noted above, NFA has filed with the Commission a proposed 
interpretation of Compliance Rule 2-13 which would set forth how a 
break-even point must be calculated and the format in which such 
calculation must be disclosed.63 The Commission believes that 
these proposed requirements with respect to fees and expenses will 
serve to better codify disclosures required under existing rules and 
assist readers of disclosure documents in understanding the nature and 
effect upon investment returns of costs incidental to the offering and 
operation of the pool. The Commission requests comment as to whether a 
description of fees and expenses should continue to be required or 
whether the break-even analysis is sufficient to accurately describe 
the costs of participation in a pool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\2This definition would be set forth in Rule 4.10(n).
    \6\3As set forth in NFA's proposed interpretation of Compliance 
Rule 2-13, to calculate the break-even point, the CPO would 
determine, per unit of participation, the amount of fees and 
expenses expected to be incurred by the pool during its first year 
of operation and subtract from that amount the amount of interest 
income expected to be earned by the pool in its first year, to 
obtain the pool's gross trading profit necessary for the pool to 
retain its initial net asset value per unit. The CPO would then 
determine the amount of additional trading profits necessary to 
offset the incentive fees which the CPO would charge for managing 
the pool. Finally, the CPO would calculate the total amount of 
trading income that the pool must earn to equal the initial selling 
price per unit after one year. This calculation would be required to 
be presented in tabular form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

9. Conflicts of Interest and Related Party Transactions
    Pursuant to current Rule 4.21(a)(3), a description of any actual or 
potential conflict of interest regarding the pool on the part of the 
CPO, CTA, FCM, IB and their principals must be included in the 
disclosure document. This discussion must include a description of any 
arrangement whereby the CPO, CTA or their principals may benefit from 
the maintenance of the pool account with the FCM or from its 
introduction to an FCM by an IB. Like current Rule 4.21(a)(3), proposed 
Rule 4.24(j) would require disclosure of any conflict of interest on 
the part of the pool's CPO and its principals. Subject to the 
requirement that all material information be disclosed, the proposal 
would eliminate such disclosure with respect to CTAs allocated less 
than ten percent of the pool's futures margins and commodity option 
premiums and investee pools allocated less than ten percent of the 
pool's assets.64 The proposed rule also would require disclosure 
of conflicts of interest with respect to any persons providing services 
to the pool or soliciting participants for the pool. This provision 
would encompass certain categories of Commission registrants specified 
in the existing rule, i.e., FCMs and IBs, as well as any other person 
providing services to the pool.65 The Commission believes that the 
purposes of conflict of interest disclosure are not limited to 
situations where such conflicts relate to a Commission registrant and 
that there may be unregulated parties, e.g., a CPO affiliate acting as 
counterparty to over-the-counter transactions with the pool, as to whom 
such disclosure may be equally material. Consequently, the Commission 
proposes to delete the specific reference in the current rule to the 
pool's FCM and IB and their principals and to substitute more general 
terminology intended to include but not to be limited to FCMs and IBs. 
Although the express requirement of disclosure of conflicts of interest 
on the part of FCM and IB principals would be eliminated, disclosure of 
such conflicts may be required as material information in specific 
situations, e.g., where an FCM's majority owner or other controlling 
person has such a conflict in regard to the pool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\4Under the general materiality standard, disclosure of 
conflicts of interest on the part of CTAs and CPOs of investee pools 
below the ten percent thresholds would be required if, in light of 
all relevant circumstances, including, for example, the nature and 
severity of the conflict, such disclosure would be material to 
prospective pool participants.
    \6\5However, current Rule 4.21(h) would require disclosure of 
all material conflicts of interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the current provision requiring the description of 
carrying broker or introducing arrangements benefitting the CPO or CTA 
and their principals has been revised to make clear that payments for 
order flow and soft dollar arrangements must be included. Payment for 
order flow is a practice whereby FCMs and IBs compensate CPOs and CTAs 
for directing customers to them. Soft dollar arrangements consist of 
arrangements whereby customer or pool funds are used to pay for 
research or other services that benefit the CPO or CTA. Both practices 
have been of concern to regulators because, among other things, they 
are often inadequately disclosed.66
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\6See, e.g., SEC Release No. 34-33026, 58 FR 52934 (October 6, 
1993) and Market 2000, An Examination of Current Equity Market 
Developments: Study V, Best Execution (Division of Market 
Regulation, SEC, January 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Separately, under proposed Rule 4.24(k) (``Related Party 
Transactions''), any material transactions or arrangements for which 
there is no publicly disseminated price between the pool and any person 
affiliated with a person providing services to the pool, would be 
required to be disclosed, including the costs of such transactions to 
the pool.67 The Commission believes that this type of disclosure 
may be viewed as already required in many cases under the general 
requirement that material information be disclosed. However, given the 
increasing use of over-the-counter transactions in which pools contract 
with the pool operator or an affiliate of the pool operator, an express 
requirement for such disclosure appears warranted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\7The purpose of this requirement is illustrated by the events 
preceding the demise of Stotler Funds, Inc., a wholly-owned 
subsidiary of Stotler Group, Inc. (``Stotler Group''), a registered 
FCM. See Complaint, CFTC v. Stotler Funds, Inc., Civil Action No. 90 
C 4387 (N.D. III., July 31, 1990). The defendant, Stotler Funds, 
Inc., was the general partner and CPO of, among other pools, Compass 
Futures Fund (``Compass'') and Advanced Portfolio Management, 
Limited Partnership (``Advanced''). The Commission's complaint 
included allegations that in December 1989, Compass used pool funds 
in the amount of approximately $4,550,000 (about 80% of its assets) 
to purchase commercial paper issued by Stotler Group and that 
Advanced used pool funds in the amount of approximately $1 million 
(about 10% of its assets) to make a loan to Stotler Group. The 
disclosure documents of Compass and Advanced did not disclose such 
uses of pool funds. The limited partnership agreement for Compass 
specifically precluded the use of pool funds to make loans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Litigation
    Current Rule 4.21(a)(13) requires disclosure of any material 
administrative, civil or criminal action within the five years 
preceding the date of the disclosure document against the CPO, CTA(s), 
FCM, IB and their principals. Like the current rule, proposed Rule 
4.24(1) would require the disclosure of administrative, civil or 
criminal actions against certain persons involved in operating or 
trading the pool during the five years preceding the date of the 
disclosure document. However, this requirement would be substantially 
simplified. Concluded actions that resulted in an adjudication on the 
merits in favor of such persons would not be required to be disclosed. 
In addition, disclosure of the litigation background of FCMs and IBs 
would be limited as follows. First, with respect to litigation brought 
by private parties, the proposed rule would provide for the materiality 
of the action to be determined by reference to the potential financial 
impact upon the FCM or IB. Specifically, an action would be considered 
material if it would be required to be disclosed in the notes to the 
registrant's financial statements prepared pursuant to generally 
accepted accounting principles (``GAAP''). Generally, under GAAP, 
certain information regarding litigation must be disclosed if the 
potential of a financial loss from the litigation is either probable 
(i.e., likely to occur) or reasonably possible (more than remote but 
less than likely).68 Except for events occurring subsequent to the 
issuance of the latest certified financial statements, under this 
paragraph, litigation required to be disclosed would already have been 
disclosed in the FCM's or IB's latest certified financial statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\8See FASB-5 (Accounting for Contingencies) relating to 
disclosure of contingencies, including litigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the requirement to disclose actions brought by the 
Commission and other regulatory agencies against FCMs and IBs would be 
streamlined. Actions brought by the Commission would be treated 
differently from those brought by other regulatory agencies due to the 
presumptively greater significance of such actions to an investment 
decision. All actions brought by the Commission would be considered 
material other than concluded actions which did not result in fines 
exceeding $50,000 and did not involve allegations of fraud or other 
willful misconduct. Actions brought by any other federal or state 
agency or by a self-regulatory organization, whether domestic or 
foreign, would be considered material if they involved allegations of 
fraud or other willful misconduct.69
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\9Litigation disclosures in CTA disclosure documents with 
respect to FCMs and IBs would be simplified in similar fashion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed rule would eliminate the requirement to 
disclose litigation against CTAs allocated less than twenty-five 
percent of the pool's initial futures margins and commodity option 
premiums and the principals of FCMs and IBs. Of course, as noted above 
with respect to conflicts of interest on the part of FCM and IB 
principals, the requirement to disclose all material information may 
require such disclosure in particular cases. Proposed Rule 4.24(l) also 
requires disclosure of litigation against a pool's trading manager, if 
any, and its principals, a requirement which is encompassed within the 
existing requirement for disclosure of litigation against CTAs.
11. Limited Risk Pools
    So-called ``guaranteed pools,'' which generally are designed to 
assure participants the return of their initial investment, have been 
extensively offered in recent years. Such pools generally commit a 
significant portion of their assets to interest-bearing instruments, 
letters of credit or other investments to fund the ``guarantee'' and 
correspondingly reduce the level of their futures or other investments. 
Many ``guarantee'' structures require that the participant maintain his 
investment in the fund for a specified period of years in order to 
realize on the guarantee. Because such structures impose significant 
costs which limit the potential for futures and other investment-
related returns, are often subject to significant conditions, e.g., 
that redemption rights not be exercised for a specified period of years 
from the date of the initial investment, and are subject to varying 
degrees of risk of nonfulfillment due to unforeseen trading losses or 
other reasons, the use of ``guarantee'' terminology in pool disclosure 
documents raises certain regulatory concerns. These concerns relate to 
such matters as the representations expressly or impliedly made as to 
the nature and security of the pool investment and the impact of the 
guarantee structure upon the overall investment. In Advisory 86-
170, the Division of Trading and Markets set forth certain 
disclosures that should be made in this context to assure that 
prospective investors are apprised of material information concerning 
guarantee structures. These include, for example, statements that a 
specified percentage of each unit of participation in the pool has been 
set aside to purchase the guarantee, that redemptions are not available 
for a specified period and that additional expenses and management fees 
are charged in connection with the guarantee, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\0(1984-1986 Transfer Binder), Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 
23,035 (April 25, 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 4.24(o) would codify minimum disclosures relevant to 
limited risk pools. Under the proposal, the term ``limited risk pool'' 
would be defined in Rule 4.10(i) to mean ``a pool * * * that is 
designed to limit the loss of the initial investment of its 
participants.'' Rule 4.24(o) would generally codify Advisory 86-1 by 
requiring the CPO of a limited risk pool to describe the nature of the 
limitation on risk intended to be provided, the manner in which the 
limitation is achieved, including the cost of providing it, the 
conditions that must be satisfied for participants to receive the 
benefits of the risk limitation and the circumstances in which the risk 
limitation becomes operative.71 CPOs are also reminded of the 
admonition in Advisory 86-1 that ``(a)ny statements that suggest that 
the risks of futures trading are decreased by reason of this structure 
have a high potential to mislead or deceive and could result in serious 
violations of the Commission's regulations and anti-fraud provisions.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\1Proposed Rule 4.24(p), which deals with transferability and 
redemption, would require a description of restrictions on 
redemption associated with the pool's investments. The Commission 
intends that this discussion include a description of any 
restrictions on transferability and redemption due to use of pool 
funds to support a guarantee and of any restrictions upon vesting of 
a guarantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

12. Other Proposed Changes
    Current Rule 4.21 requires certain negative statements to be made 
in a pool disclosure document where there is no pertinent information 
to report. A CPO must state, if true, that there are no actual or 
potential conflicts of interest regarding any aspect of the pool on the 
part of certain persons, that certain persons do not own any beneficial 
interest in the pool, that no material litigation occurred within the 
past five years against the CPO, CTA, FCM, IB and their principals, and 
that the CPO, CTA, and their principals will not trade for their own 
accounts. These negative statements would no longer be required.
    Proposed Rule 4.21 would permit CPOs to provide prospective 
participants who are accredited investors as defined in Rule 501 of 
Regulation D of the Securities Act\72\ with a notice of intended 
offering and term sheet prior to delivery of the disclosure document. 
This provision should facilitate the offering of pools that qualify for 
relief from registration under the Securities Act as private offerings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\217 CFR Rule 230.501 (1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is requesting comment as to whether there are 
specific situations in which the streamlined disclosure document 
proposed herein may not offer adequate protection to prospective and 
existing pool participants or managed account clients. Further, the 
Commission requests comment as to whether additional changes to further 
streamline the requirements of Rule 4.21 and 4.31 and improve the 
clarity of such disclosures could be made without reducing customer 
protection and on whether any additional disclosures should be 
required.
    The Commission also requests comment on whether the requirement in 
current Rule 4.21(d) (proposed to be numbered as Rule 4.21(b)) that a 
CPO must receive from a prospective pool participant an acknowledgment 
that the participant has received a disclosure document for the pool 
continues to be necessary.

C. Section 4.26--Use, Amendment and Filing of Disclosure Documents

    Except as follows, the requirements for updating pool disclosure 
documents would remain substantially unchanged and are proposed to be 
set forth in Rule 4.26. The Commission is proposing to extend from six 
to nine months the maximum period between the date on a disclosure 
document and the date of its use. This would conform the updating 
requirements of pool disclosure documents to those of Section 10(a)(3) 
of the Securities Act for public securities offerings.73 As under 
current Rule 4.21(b), two copies of each amendment to the disclosure 
document must be filed within twenty-one calendar days of the date upon 
which the pool operator first knows or has reason to know of the defect 
requiring the amendment. There has been some uncertainty as to whether 
amendments are subject to the twenty-one day prefiling requirements of 
current Rule 4.21(g)(1) (renumbered as Rule 4.26(d)(1)). The Commission 
is confirming that such amendments may be used simultaneously with 
their filing with the Commission, i.e., not more than twenty-one days 
after the date on which the pool operator first knows or has reason to 
know that the disclosure document is materially inaccurate or 
incomplete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\3Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act requires that when a 
securities prospectus is used more than nine months after the 
effective date of the registration statement, information contained 
therein may not be as of a date more than sixteen months prior to 
such use if the information is known and can be furnished without 
unreasonable effort or expense.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Related Matters

A. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''), 5 U.S.C. 601-611 (1988), 
requires that agencies, in proposing rules, consider the impact of 
those rules on small businesses. The rule amendments discussed herein 
would affect registered CPOs and CTAs. The Commission has previously 
established certain definitions of ``small entities'' to be used by the 
Commission in evaluating the impact of its rules on such entities in 
accordance with the RFA.74 The Commission previously determined 
that registered CPOs are not small entities for the purpose of the 
RFA.75 With respect to CTAs, the Commission has stated that it 
would evaluate within the context of a particular rule proposal whether 
all or some affected CTAs would be considered to be small entities and, 
if so, the economic impact on them of any rule.76
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\447 FR 18618-18621 (April 30, 1982).
    \7\547 FR 18619-18620.
    \7\647 FR 18618, 18620.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The amendments proposed herein would reduce rather than increase 
the requirements of Rule 4.21 for CPOs and the requirements of Rule 
4.31 for CTAs. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 3(a) of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 
605(b)), the Acting Chairman, on behalf of the Commission, certifies 
that these proposed amendments would not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Commission 
nonetheless invites comment from any registered CPO or CTA who believes 
that these rules would have a significant impact on its operations.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, (``PRA'') 44 U.S.C. 3501 et. 
seq., imposes certain requirements on federal agencies (including the 
Commission) in connection with their conducting or sponsoring any 
collection of information as defined by the PRA. In compliance with the 
PRA the Commission has submitted these proposed rule amendments and the 
associated information collection requirements to the Office of 
Management and Budget. The burden associated with this entire 
collection, including this proposed rule, is as follows:

Average Burden Hours per Response: 124.65.
Number of Respondents: 3,924.
Frequency of Response: On Occasion.

    The burden associated with these specific proposed rules, is as 
follows:

Average Burden Hours per Response: 8.05.
Number of Respondents: 1,162.
Frequency of Response: On Occasion.

    Persons wishing to comment on the estimated paperwork burden 
associated with this proposed rule should contact Gary Waxman, Office 
of Management and Budget, room 3228, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 
395-7340. Copies of the information collection submission to OMB are 
available from Joe F. Mink, CFTC Clearance officer, 2033 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 254-9735.

List of Subjects

17 CFR Part 1

    Customer protection, risk disclosure statements.

17 CFR Part 4

    Commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors.

17 CFR Part 30

    Foreign futures and foreign options transactions.

17 CFR Part 150

    Limits on positions.

    In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority 
contained in the Commodity Exchange Act, and in particular, sections 
2(a)(1), 4b, 4c, 41, 4m, 4n, 4o, and 8a, 7 U.S.C. 2, 6b, 6c, 61, 6m, 
6n, 6o, and 12a, the Commission hereby proposes to amend Chapter I of 
Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 1--GENERAL REGULATIONS UNDER THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT

    1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 2a, 4, 4a, 6, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 
6g, 6h, 6i, 6j, 6k, 61, 6m, 6n, 6o, 6p, 7, 7a, 7b, 8, 9, 12, 12a, 
12c, 13a, 13a-1, 16, 16a, 19, 21, 23 and 24.

    2. Section 1.55 is proposed to be amended by adding paragraph 
(a)(1)(iii) to read as follows:


Sec. 1.55   Distribution of ``Risk Disclosure Statement'' by futures 
commission merchants and introducing brokers.

    (a)(1) * * *
    (iii) Solely for purposes of this section, a pool operated by a 
commodity pool operator registered under the Commodity Exchange Act or 
exempt from such registration need not be treated as a customer.
* * * * *

PART 4--COMMODITY POOL OPERATORS AND COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS

    3. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 4, 6b, 6c, 61, 6m, 6n, 6o, 12a and 
23.

Subpart A--General Provisions, Definitions and Exemptions

    4. Section 4.10 is proposed to be amended by adding new paragraphs 
(h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m), and (n) to read as follows:


Sec. 4.10   Definitions.

* * * * *
    (h) Multi-advisor pool means a pool in which no commodity trading 
advisor is allocated or intended to be allocated twenty-five percent or 
more of the pool's aggregate initial margin and premiums for futures 
and commodity option contracts and no investee pool is allocated or 
intended to be allocated twenty-five percent or more of the pool's 
total assets.
    (i) Limited risk pool means a pool (commonly referred to as a 
``guaranteed pool'') that is designed to limit the loss of the initial 
investment of its participants.
    (j) Trading manager means, with respect to a pool, any person, 
other than the commodity pool operator of the pool, with authority to 
allocate pool assets to commodity trading advisors or investee pools.
    (k) Major commodity trading advisor means any commodity trading 
advisor that is allocated or is intended to be allocated at least 
twenty-five percent of the pool's aggregate initial margin and premiums 
for futures and commodity option contracts.
    (l) Major investee pool means any investee pool that is allocated 
or intended to be allocated at least twenty-five percent of the assets 
of the pool.
    (m) Trading principal means:
    (1) A principal of a commodity pool operator who participates in 
making commodity interest trading decisions for a pool, or who 
supervises, or has authority to allocate pool assets to, persons so 
engaged; and
    (2) A principal of a commodity trading advisor who participates in 
making commodity interest trading decisions for a client account or who 
supervises or selects persons so engaged.
    (n) Break-even point means the trading profit that a pool or 
trading program must realize in its first year to equal all fees and 
expenses such that a participant or client will recoup its initial 
investment, as calculated pursuant to rules promulgated by a registered 
futures association pursuant to section 17(j) of the Act. The break-
even point must be expressed as a percentage of the minimum unit of 
initial investment and assume redemption of the initial investment at 
the end of the first year of investment.

    5. Section 4.12 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs 
(b)(2)(i) and (b)(5)(i) to read as follows:


Sec. 4.12  Exemption from provisions of part 4.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) In the case of Sec. 4.24, that the Commission accept in lieu 
and in satisfaction of the disclosure document specified by that 
section an offering memorandum for the pool which does not contain the 
information required by Secs. 4.24(a), 4.24(b), and 4.24(n), provided, 
that the offering memorandum:
    (A) Is prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act 
of 1933 or the exemption from said Act pursuant to which the pool is 
being offered and sold;
    (B) Contains the information required by Secs. 4.24(c) through (m) 
and (o) through (u);
    (C) Complies with the requirements of Secs. 4.24(v) and (w).
* * * * *
    (5)(i) If a claim of exemption has been made under 
Sec. 4.12(b)(2)(i), the commodity pool operator must make a statement 
to that effect on the cover page of each offering memorandum, or 
amendment thereto, that it is required to file with the Commission 
pursuant to Sec. 4.26.
* * * * *
    6. Section 4.21 is proposed to be revised to read as follows:


Sec. 4.21  Required Delivery of Pool Disclosure Document.

    (a) No commodity pool operator registered or required to be 
registered under the Act may, directly or indirectly, solicit, accept 
or receive funds, securities or other property from a prospective 
participant in a pool that it operates or that it intends to operate 
unless, on or before the date it engages in that activity, the 
commodity pool operator delivers or causes to be delivered to the 
prospective participant a disclosure document for the pool containing 
the information set forth in Sec. 4.24, Provided, however, That where 
the prospective investor is an accredited investor, as defined in 17 
CFR 230.501, a notice of intended offering and term sheet may be 
provided subject to rules promulgated by a registered futures 
association pursuant to section 17(j) of the Act.
    (b) The commodity pool operator may not accept or receive funds, 
securities or other property from a prospective participant unless the 
pool operator first receives from the prospective participant an 
acknowledgment signed and dated by the prospective participant stating 
that the participant received a disclosure document for the pool.

    7. Section 4.22 is proposed to be amended by adding new paragraph 
(a)(4) to read as follows:


Sec. 4.22  Reporting to pool participants.

    (a) * * *
    (4) The Account Statement must provide the names of all commodity 
trading advisors directing trading for the pool and of all investee 
pools as of the date of the Account Statement, together with the 
percentage of pool assets each is allocated. In addition, if the 
performance of major commodity trading advisors and investee pools is 
required to be disclosed in a pool disclosure document, the Account 
Statements must include the past performance of each commodity trading 
advisor previously allocated less than ten percent of the pool's 
aggregate initial margin and premiums for futures and commodity option 
contracts and investee pool previously allocated less than ten percent 
of the pool assets that is a major commodity trading advisor or 
investee pool as of the date of the Account Statement.
* * * * *
    8. Section 4.23 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph 
(a)(3) to read as follows:


Sec. 4.23  Recordkeeping.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (3) The acknowledgement specified by Sec. 4.21(b) for each 
participant in the pool.
* * * * *
    9. Sections 4.24, 4.25 and 4.26 are proposed to be added as 
follows:


Sec. 4.24  General disclosures required.

    Except as otherwise provided herein, a disclosure document must 
include the following information.
    (a) Cautionary statement. The following Cautionary Statement must 
be prominently displayed on the cover page of the disclosure document.

    THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE 
MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS POOL NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED 
ON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.

    (b) Risk Disclosure Statement. (1) The following Risk Disclosure 
Statement must be prominently displayed immediately following any 
disclosures required to appear on the cover page of the disclosure 
document as provided by the Commission or any applicable federal or 
state securities laws and regulations.

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

    YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION 
PERMITS YOU TO PARTICIPATE IN A COMMODITY POOL. IN SO DOING, YOU 
SHOULD BE AWARE THAT FUTURES AND OPTIONS TRADING CAN QUICKLY LEAD TO 
LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS. SUCH TRADING LOSSES CAN SHARPLY 
REDUCE THE NET ASSET VALUE OF THE POOL AND CONSEQUENTLY THE VALUE OF 
YOUR INTEREST IN THE POOL. IN ADDITION, RESTRICTIONS ON REDEMPTIONS 
MAY AFFECT YOUR ABILITY TO WITHDRAW YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THE POOL.
    FURTHER, COMMODITY POOLS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL CHARGES 
FOR MANAGEMENT, AND ADVISORY AND BROKERAGE FEES. IT MAY BE NECESSARY 
FOR THOSE POOLS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THESE CHARGES TO MAKE 
SUBSTANTIAL TRADING PROFITS TO AVOID DEPLETION OR EXHAUSTION OF 
THEIR ASSETS. THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CONTAINS A COMPLETE 
DESCRIPTION OF EACH EXPENSE TO BE CHARGED THIS POOL AT PAGE (insert 
page number) AND A STATEMENT OF THE PERCENTAGE RETURN NECESSARY TO 
BREAK EVEN, THAT IS, TO RECOVER THE AMOUNT OF YOUR INITIAL 
INVESTMENT, AT PAGE (insert page number).
    THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL THE RISKS AND OTHER 
FACTORS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS COMMODITY 
POOL. THEREFORE, BEFORE YOU DECIDE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS COMMODITY 
POOL, YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY STUDY THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, INCLUDING A 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS OF THIS INVESTMENT, AT PAGE 
(insert page number).

    (2) If the pool may trade foreign futures or options contracts, the 
Risk Disclosure Statement must further state:

    YOU SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT THIS COMMODITY POOL MAY TRADE 
FOREIGN FUTURES OR OPTIONS CONTRACTS. TRANSACTIONS ON MARKETS 
LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING MARKETS FORMALLY LINKED 
TO A UNITED STATES MARKET, MAY BE SUBJECT TO REGULATIONS WHICH OFFER 
DIFFERENT OR DIMINISHED PROTECTION TO THE POOL AND ITS PARTICIPANTS. 
FURTHER, UNITED STATES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES MAY BE UNABLE TO 
COMPEL THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RULES OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OR 
MARKETS IN NON-UNITED STATES JURISDICTIONS WHERE TRANSACTIONS FOR 
THE POOL MAY BE EFFECTED.
    (c) Table of Contents. A table of contents showing, by subject 
matter, the location of the disclosures made in the disclosure document 
must appear immediately following the Risk Disclosure Statement.
    (d) Information Required In the Forepart of the Document: (1) The 
name, address of the main business office, main business telephone 
number and form of organization of the pool. If the mailing address of 
the main business office is a post office box number or is not within 
the United States, the pool operator must state where the pool's books 
and records will be kept and made available for inspection;
    (2) The name, address of the main business office, main business 
telephone number and form of organization of the commodity pool 
operator. If the mailing address of the main business office is a post 
office box number or is not within the United States, the pool operator 
must state where its books and records will be kept and made available 
for inspection;
    (3) A statement whether the pool is:
    (i) privately offered pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 4(2) of the Securities 
Act of 1933;
    (ii) A multi-advisor pool as defined in Sec. 4.10(h);
    (iii) A limited risk pool as defined in Sec. 4.10(i); and
    (iv) Continuously offered and if not, the closing date of the 
offering.
    (4) The date when the disclosure document will first be used; and
    (5) The break-even point per unit of initial investment, as 
specified in Sec. 4.10(n).
    (e) The name of: (1) Each principal of the pool operator;
    (2) The pool's trading manager, if any, and each principal thereof; 
and
    (3) Each investee pool allocated or intended to be allocated at 
least ten percent of the assets of the pool offered, each commodity 
trading advisor that is allocated or intended to be allocated at least 
ten percent of the pool's aggregate initial margin and premiums for 
futures and commodity option contracts, the operator of each such 
investee pool and each principal of such commodity trading advisor and 
of the commodity pool operator of such investee pool;
    (4) Which of the foregoing persons will make trading decisions for 
the pool; and
    (5) If known, the futures commission merchant through which the 
pool will execute its trades.
    (f) Business background. (1) The business background, for the five 
years preceding the date of the disclosure document, of:
    (i) The commodity pool operator, the pool's trading manager, if 
any, each major commodity trading advisor and the operator of each 
major investee pool; and
    (ii) Each principal of the foregoing persons who participates in 
making trading or operational decisions for the pool or supervises 
persons so engaged.
    (2) The pool operator must include in the description of the 
business background of each such person the name and main business of 
that person's employers, business associations or business ventures and 
the nature of the duties performed by such person for the employers or 
in connection with the associations or ventures.
    (g) Principal risk factors. As applicable, a discussion of the 
principal risk factors of this investment. This discussion must 
include, without limitation, risks relating to volatility, leverage, 
and counterparty creditworthiness.
    (h) Use of proceeds. The pool operator must disclose:
    (1) The types of commodity interests or other interests the 
commodity pool operator intends that the pool will hold or trade, with 
a description of the trading program that will be followed and any 
restrictions or limitations on such interests or trading required by 
the pool's organizational documents or otherwise.
    (2)(i) The manner in which the pool will fulfill its margin 
requirements and the approximate percentage of the pool's property that 
will be segregated pursuant to the Act and the Commission's regulations 
thereunder.
    (ii) If property deposited as margin generates income, to whom that 
income will be paid.
    (iii) If the pool will fulfill its margin requirements with other 
than cash deposits, the nature of such deposits.
    (3) With respect to pool property not deposited as margin, paid as 
premiums or held in cash or cash equivalents:
    (i) The nature of such property (e.g., securities listed on a 
national securities exchange, interests in commodity pools or other 
funds, bonds, commercial paper) including whether such property is 
subject to state or federal regulation or to regulation by a foreign 
government, and any investment rating thereof; and
    (ii) The custodian or other entity, e.g., bank or brokerdealer, 
which will hold pool property not deposited as margin or paid as 
premiums, and, if such property will be held or invested outside of the 
United States, its territories or possessions, the jurisdiction in 
which it will be held;
    (i) Fees and expenses. (1) A complete description of each fee, 
expense and commission which the commodity pool operator knows or 
should know has been incurred by the pool for its preceding fiscal year 
and is expected to be incurred by the pool in its current fiscal year, 
including fees and expenses occurring within investee pools.
    (2) This description shall include, but not be limited to:
    (i) Management fees;
    (ii) Brokerage fees and commissions, including interest income paid 
to futures commission merchants;
    (iii) Fees and commissions paid in connection with trading advice 
provided to the pool;
    (iv) Fees and expenses incurred within investments in investee 
pools and other collective investment vehicles, disclosed separately 
for each investment tier;
    (v) Incentive fees and any disproportionate share of profits 
allocated to the commodity pool operator, i.e., any right of the 
commodity pool operator to receive a greater than pro rata share of the 
pool's profits, based on the percentage of capital contributions made 
by the commodity pool operator.
    (vi) Commissions or other benefits, including trailing commissions 
paid or that may be paid or accrue, directly or indirectly, to any 
person in connection with the solicitation of participations in the 
pool; and
    (vii) Professional and general administrative fees and expenses, 
including legal and accounting fees and office supplies expenses;
    (viii) Organizational and offering expenses;
    (ix) Clearance fees and fees paid to national exchanges and self-
regulatory organizations;
    (x) For limited risk pools, any costs of providing the limitation 
on risk as referred to in paragraph (o)(3) of this section; and
    (xi) Any other fee or expense.
    (3) Where any expense, fee or commission is determined by reference 
to a base amount including, but not limited to, ``net assets,'' ``gross 
profits,'' ``net profits,'' or ``net gains,'' the pool operator must 
specifically explain how such base amount will be calculated.
    (4) Where any expense, fee or commission is based on an increase in 
the value of the pool, the pool operator must specify how the increase 
is calculated, the period of time during which the increase is 
calculated, the expense, fee or commission to be charged at the end of 
that period and the value of the pool at which payment of the expense, 
fee or commission commences.
    (5) Where any expense, fee or commission of the pool has been paid 
or is to be paid by a person other than the pool, the pool operator 
must disclose the nature and amount thereof and the person who paid or 
who is expected to pay it.
    (6) The pool operator must provide, in a tabular format, an 
analysis setting forth how the break-even point for the pool was 
calculated. The analysis must include all fees, expenses and 
commissions of the pool, as set forth in Sec. 4.24(i)(2).
    (j) Conflicts of Interest. (1) A full description of any actual or 
potential conflicts of interest regarding any aspect of the pool on the 
part of:
    (i) The commodity pool operator, the pool's trading manager, if 
any, any commodity trading advisor allocated or intended to be 
allocated at least ten percent of the pool's aggregate initial margin 
and premiums for futures and commodity option contracts and the 
commodity pool operator of any investee pool allocated or intended to 
be allocated at least ten percent of the assets of the pool;
    (ii) Any principal of the foregoing; and
    (iii) Any person providing services to the pool or soliciting 
participants for the pool.
    (2) Included in the description of such conflicts shall be any 
arrangement whereby a person may benefit, directly or indirectly, from 
the maintenance of the pool's account with the futures commission 
merchant or from the introduction of the pool's account to a futures 
commission merchant by an introducing broker (such as payment for order 
flow or soft dollar arrangements) or from an investment of pool assets 
in investee pools or other investments.
    (k) Related party transactions. A full description, including a 
discussion of the costs thereof to the pool, of any material 
transactions or arrangements between the pool and any person affiliated 
with a person providing services to the pool for which there is no 
publicly disseminated price.
    (l) Litigation. (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (l)(2) 
of this section, any material administrative, civil or criminal action, 
whether pending or concluded, within five years preceding the date of 
the document, against any of the following persons, except a concluded 
action that resulted in an adjudication on the merits in favor of such 
person:
    (i) The commodity pool operator, the pool's trading manager, if 
any, the pool's major commodity trading advisors and the operators of 
the pool's major investee pools;
    (ii) Any principal of the foregoing;
    (iii) The pool's futures commission merchants and introducing 
brokers, if any.
    (2) With respect to futures commission merchants and introducing 
brokers, an action will be considered material if:
    (i) The action would be required to be disclosed in the notes to 
the futures commission merchant's or introducing broker's financial 
statements prepared pursuant to generally accepted accounting 
principles;
    (ii) The action was brought by the Commission, Provided, however, 
That a concluded action that did not result in fines exceeding $50,000 
need not be disclosed unless it involved allegations of fraud or other 
willful misconduct; or
    (iii) The action was brought by any other federal or state 
regulatory agency, or by a self-regulatory organization, domestic or 
foreign, and involved allegations of fraud or other willful misconduct.
    (m) Trading for Own Account. If the commodity pool operator, the 
pool's trading manager, any of the pool's commodity trading advisors or 
any principal thereof trades or intends to trade commodity interests 
for its own account, the pool operator must disclose whether 
participants will be permitted to inspect the records of such person's 
trades and any written policies related to such trading.
    (n) Performance disclosures as set forth in Sec. 4.25.
    (o) Limited risk pools. If the pool is a limited risk pool, as 
defined in Sec. 4.10(i) the commodity pool operator must:
    (1) Describe the nature of the limitation on risk intended to be 
provided, the manner by which such risk limitation will be achieved, 
including sources of funding, and what conditions must be satisfied for 
participants to receive the benefits of the risk limitation;
    (2) Specify when the limitation on risk becomes operative; and
    (3) Disclose, in the break-even analysis required by 
Sec. 4.24(i)(6), the costs of purchasing and carrying the assets to 
fund the limitation on risk, expressed as a percentage of the price of 
a unit of participation.
    (p) Transferability and redemption. (1) A complete description of 
any restrictions upon the transferability of a participant's interest 
in the pool; and
    (2) A complete description of the manner in which a participant may 
redeem its interest in the pool. That description must specify:
    (i) How the redemption value of a participant's interest will be 
calculated;
    (ii) The conditions under which a participant may redeem its 
interest, including the cost associated therewith, the terms of any 
notification required and the time between the request for redemption 
and payment;
    (iii) Any restrictions on the redemption of a participant's 
interest, including any restrictions associated with the pool's 
investments; and
    (iv) Any liquidity risks relative to the pool's redemption 
capabilities.
    (q) Liability of pool participants. The extent to which a 
participant may be held liable for obligations of the pool in excess of 
the funds contributed by the participant for the purchase of an 
interest in the pool.
    (r) Distribution of profits and taxation. (1) The pool's policies 
with respect to the payment of distributions from profits or capital 
and the frequency of such payments; and
    The Federal income tax effects of such payments for a participant, 
including a discussion of the Federal income tax laws applicable to the 
form of organization of the pool and to such payments therefrom. If a 
pool is specifically structured to accomplish certain Federal income 
tax objectives, the commodity pool operator must explain those 
objectives, the manner in which they will be achieved and any risks 
relative thereto.
    (s) Inception of trading and other information. (1) The minimum 
aggregate subscriptions that will be necessary for the pool to commence 
trading commodity interests;
    (2) The minimum and maximum aggregate subscriptions that may be 
contributed to the pool;
    (3) The maximum period of time for which the pool will hold funds 
prior to the commencement of trading commodity interests;
    (4) The disposition of funds received if the pool does not receive 
the necessary amount to commence trading, including the period of time 
within which the disposition will be made; and
    (5) Where the pool operator will deposit funds received prior to 
the commencement of trading by the pool, and a statement as to whom any 
income from such deposits will be paid.
    (t) Ownership in pool. The extent of any ownership or beneficial 
interest in the pool held by:
    (1) The commodity pool operator;
    (2) The pool's trading manager;
    (3) The pool's major commodity trading advisors and the operators 
of the pool's major investee pools; and
    (4) Any principal of the foregoing.
    (u) Reporting to pool participants. A statement that the commodity 
pool operator must provide all participants with monthly or quarterly 
(whichever applies) statements of account and with an annual report 
containing financial statements certified by an independent public 
accountant.
    (v) Voluntary information. If any information, other than that 
required by the Commission, the antifraud provisions of the Act, or any 
federal or state securities laws and regulations, is provided, such 
information:
    (1) May not be misleading in content or presentation or 
inconsistent with required disclosures;
    (2) Shall be subject to the antifraud provisions of the Act and the 
regulations thereunder and to rules regarding the use of promotional 
material promulgated by a registered futures association, pursuant to 
section 17(j) of the Act; and
    (3) May only appear following the related required disclosures, 
unless otherwise specified in this rule.
    (w) Material information. This section does not relieve a commodity 
pool operator from any obligation under the Act or the regulations 
thereunder, including the obligation to disclose all material 
information to existing or prospective pool participants even if the 
information is not specifically required by this section.


Sec. 4.25  Performance disclosures.

    (a) General principles and definitions. (1)(i) Capsule Performance: 
Unless otherwise specified, the disclosure of the performance of a pool 
must be net of any fees, expenses or allocations to the commodity pool 
operator and include the following information.
    (A) The name of the pool;
    (B) A statement as to whether the pool is:
    (1) Privately offered pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 4(2) of the Securities 
Act of 1933;
    (2) A multi-advisor pool as defined in Sec. 4.10(h); and
    (3) A limited risk pool as defined in 4.10(i);
    (C) The date of inception of trading;
    (D) The aggregate gross capital subscriptions to the pool;
    (E) The pool's current net asset value;
    (F) The largest monthly draw-down, during the most recent five 
calendar years and year-to-date, expressed as a percentage of pool net 
asset value; the month and year of the draw-down must be specified.
    (G) The worst continuous peak-to-valley draw-down during the most 
recent five calendar years and year-to-date, expressed as a percentage 
of pool net asset value, indicating the months and year of the draw-
down (for example, a peak-to-valley draw-down of ``4 to 8-91/25%'' 
means that the peak-to-valley draw-down lasted from April to August of 
1991 and resulted in a twenty-five percent cumulative draw-down;) and
    (H) The annual and year-to-date rate of return for the pool, 
computed on a compounded monthly basis, except that performance of the 
pool offered must include monthly rates of return.
    (ii) Unless otherwise specified, the performance of accounts must 
include:
    (A) The name of the commodity trading advisor or other person 
trading the account and the name of the trading program;
    (B) The date on which the commodity trading advisor began trading 
client accounts and the date when client funds began being traded 
pursuant to the trading program;
    (C) The number of accounts directed by the commodity trading 
advisor pursuant to the trading program specified as of the date of the 
disclosure document;
    (D) The total assets under the management of the commodity trading 
advisor and in the trading program specified, as of the date of the 
disclosure document;
    (E) The largest monthly draw-down for the trading program specified 
during the most recent five calendar year and year-to-date expressed as 
a percentage of client funds. The month and year of the draw-down must 
be specified;
    (F) The worst ever continuous peak-to-valley draw-down in for the 
trading program specified during the most recent five calendar year and 
year-to-date, indicating the months and year of the draw-down, 
expressed as a percentage of net asset value (for example, a peak-to-
valley draw-down of ``4 to 8-91/25%'' means that the peak-to-valley 
draw-down lasted from April to August of 1991 and resulted in a twenty-
five percent cumulative draw-down;) and
    (G) The annual and year-to-date rate-of-return for the program 
specified, computed on a compounded monthly basis.
    (2) The performance of the pool offered must be identified as such 
and separately presented first and its rate of return must be stated in 
monthly increments.
    (3) With respect to pools other than the pool offered for which 
performance is required to be presented under this section:
    (i) Pools of the same class as the pool offered must be presented 
following the performance of the pool offered, on a pool by pool basis.
    (ii) Pools of a different class must be presented less prominently 
and, unless such presentation would be misleading, may be presented in 
composite form; Provided, That the disclosure document must disclose 
how the composite was developed and that pools of different classes may 
not be presented in a composite. The commodity pool operator must be 
prepared to justify the inclusion in a composite of the pools contained 
therein.
    (iii) For the purpose of Sec. 4.25(3)(ii), without limitation, the 
following shall be considered pools of different classes: Pools 
privately offered pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act and 
public offerings; pools of materially different leverages; limited and 
non-limited risk pools; pools using different trading programs; and 
multi-advisor pools as defined in Sec. 4.10(h) and non-multi-advisor 
pools.
    (iv) Material differences among the pools for which past 
performance is disclosed must be described.
    (4) The past performance of accounts required to be presented under 
this section must be presented on a program by program basis using the 
format set forth in Sec. 4.25(a)(1)(ii).
    (5) The disclosure document must indicate whether the pool offered 
will use any of the trading programs for which past performance is 
presented.
    (6) All past performance presented in a disclosure document, 
including voluntarily presented performance, must be calculated in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as specified 
below or by a method otherwise approved by the Commission. All 
performance data presented in a disclosure document must be current as 
of a date not more than three months preceding the date of the 
document. The commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor must 
maintain all supporting documents necessary to substantiate such 
calculations, in accordance with Sec. 1.31.
    (i) The beginning net asset value for the period, which shall be 
the same as the previous period's ending net asset value;
    (ii) All additions, whether voluntary or involuntary, during the 
period;
    (iii) All withdrawals and redemptions, whether voluntary or 
involuntary, during the period;
    (iv) The net performance for the period, which shall represent the 
change in the net asset value net of additions, withdrawals, and 
redemptions;
    (v) The ending net asset value for the period, which shall 
represent the beginning net asset value plus or minus additions, 
withdrawals, redemptions and net performance;
    (vi) The rate of return for the period, which shall be calculated 
by dividing the net performance by the beginning net asset value or by 
a method otherwise approved by the Commission; and
    (vii) The number of units outstanding at the end of the period, if 
applicable.
    (7) All required performance information must be presented for the 
most recent five calendar years and year-to-date or for its entire 
duration, if less than five years.
    (8) Adverse performance: Where presentation of adverse performance 
is required hereunder, adverse performance means any annual return of 
one hundred basis points less than the ninety day Treasury Bill rate on 
December 31 of the calendar year in which the performance occurred or 
any termination of a pool pursuant to a loss termination provision. To 
disclose adverse performance, the pool operator must indicate the year 
in which it occurred, the annual rate of return for that year, the 
commodity trading advisor or commodity pool operator responsible for 
the performance and the capacity of such person in respect of the pool 
being offered.
    (9) The performance of any pool or account in which the pool 
operator, trading manager, commodity trading advisor or any principal 
thereof, or any person providing services to the pool owns or controls 
fifty percent or more of the beneficial interest shall not be included 
in a disclosure document unless such performance is prominently labeled 
as proprietary and is set forth separately after all required 
disclosures.
    (10) Any past performance presentation, whether required or 
voluntarily provided, must be preceded by the following statement, 
prominently displayed:

    PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT PREDICTIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

    (b) Pools which have traded commodity interests for three years or 
more with no fewer than fifteen participants unaffiliated with the 
commodity pool operator and in which no more than ten percent of the 
assets were contributed by the commodity pool operator. The pool 
operator must disclose the performance of the pool offered, as set 
forth in Sec. 4.25(a)(1)(i) (C) through (H).
    (c) Other pools. (1)(i) The pool operator must disclose the 
performance of the pool offered, as set forth in Sec. 4.25(a)(1)(i) (C) 
through (H).
    (ii) If applicable, the pool operator must prominently display the 
following statement:

    THIS POOL HAS NOT COMMENCED TRADING AND DOES NOT HAVE ANY 
PERFORMANCE HISTORY.

    (2) (i) The pool operator must disclose the performance of each 
other pool operated and each other account traded by the pool operator 
or, if the pool has a trading manager, by the trading manager.
    (ii) If the pool operator, or if applicable, the trading manager, 
has less than a three-year history in trading pools with no fewer than 
fifteen participants unaffiliated with the pool operator and in which 
no more than ten percent of the assets were contributed by the 
commodity pool operator, the pool operator must also disclose the 
performance of each other pool operated and each other account traded, 
by each trading principal of the pool operator or the trading manager, 
if applicable.
    (iii) If neither the pool operator or trading manager, if 
applicable, nor any of its trading principals has operated any other 
pools or traded any other accounts during the prescribed period, the 
pool operator must prominently display the following statement:

    NEITHER THIS POOL OPERATOR (TRADING MANAGER, if applicable) NOR 
ANY OF ITS TRADING PRINCIPALS HAS PREVIOUSLY OPERATED ANY OTHER 
POOLS OR TRADED ANY OTHER ACCOUNTS;

    (3)(i) The pool operator must disclose the performance of any 
accounts (including pools) directed by any major commodity trading 
advisor and of any major investee pool.
    (ii) If a major commodity trading advisor or major investee pool 
has no prior performance history, the pool operator must prominently 
display the following statement(s), as applicable:

    (name of the major commodity trading advisor), A COMMODITY 
TRADING ADVISOR THAT HAS DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY OVER (percentage of 
the pool's aggregate initial margin and premiums for futures and 
commodity option contracts allocated to that trading advisor) 
PERCENT OF THE POOL'S DIRECT FUTURES AND COMMODITY OPTION TRADING 
HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED ANY ACCOUNTS; and
    (name of the major investee pool), AN INVESTEE POOL THAT IS 
ALLOCATED (percentage of the pool assets allocated to that investee 
pool) PERCENT OF THE POOL'S ASSETS HAS NOT COMMENCED TRADING.

    (iii) Unless this performance is otherwise required to be 
disclosed, the pool operator must indicate, as set forth in 
Sec. 4.25(a)(8), any adverse performance for any account (including 
pools) directed or operated by the pool operator, any trading principal 
of the pool operator or trading manager, any commodity trading advisor 
allocated at least ten percent of the pool's aggregate initial margin 
and premiums for futures and commodity option contracts and for any 
investee pool allocated at least ten percent of the pool's assets. In 
addition, if a major commodity trading advisor or major investee pool 
has no prior operating history, the pool operator must indicate any 
adverse performance for any account (including pools) directed or 
operated by any trading principal of that advisor or of the commodity 
pool operator of the investee pool. In lieu of giving an indication of 
adverse performance, the commodity pool operator may provide capsule 
performance disclosure as set forth in Sec. 4.25(a)(1).


Sec. 4.26  Use, amendment and filing of disclosure document.

    (a)(1) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, all information 
contained in the disclosure document must be current as of the date of 
the document; provided, however, That performance information may be 
current as of a date not more than three months prior to the date of 
the document.
    (2) No commodity pool operator may use a disclosure document dated 
more than nine months prior to the date of its use.
    (b) The commodity pool operator must attach to the disclosure 
document the most current Account Statement and Annual Report for the 
pool required to be distributed in accordance with Sec. 4.22.
    (c)(1) If the commodity pool operator knows or should know that the 
disclosure document is materially inaccurate or incomplete in any 
respect, it must correct that defect and must distribute the correction 
to:
    (i) All existing pool participants within 21 calendar days of the 
date upon which the pool operator first knows or has reason to know of 
the defect; and
    (ii) Each previously solicited prospective pool participant prior 
to accepting or receiving funds, securities or other property from any 
such prospective participant. The pool operator may furnish the 
correction by way of an amended document, a sticker on the document, or 
other similar means.
    (2) The pool operator may not use the document until such 
correction has been made.
    (d) Except as provided by Sec. 4.8:
    (1) The commodity pool operator must file with the Commission two 
copies of the disclosure document for each pool that it operates or 
that it intends to operate not less than 21 calendar days prior to the 
date the pool operator first intends to deliver the document to a 
prospective participant in the pool; and
    (2) The commodity pool operator must file with the Commission two 
copies of all subsequent amendments to the disclosure document for each 
pool that it operates or that it intends to operate within 21 calendar 
days of the date upon which the pool operator first knows or has reason 
to know of the defect requiring the amendment.

    10. Section 4.31 is proposed to be revised to read as follows:


Sec. 4.31  Required delivery of disclosure document to prospective 
clients.

    (a) No commodity trading advisor registered or required to be 
registered under the Act may solicit a prospective client, or enter 
into an agreement with a prospective client to direct the client's 
commodity interest account or to guide the client's commodity interest 
trading by means of a systematic program that recommends specific 
transactions, unless the commodity trading advisor, at or before the 
time it engages in the solicitation or enters into the agreement 
(whichever is earlier), delivers or causes to be delivered to the 
prospective client a disclosure document for the trading program 
pursuant to which the trading advisor seeks to direct the client's 
account or to guide the client's trading, containing the information 
set forth in Secs. 4.33 and 4.34.
    (b) The commodity trading advisor may not enter into an agreement 
with a prospective client to direct the client's commodity interest 
account or to guide the client's commodity interest trading unless the 
trading advisor first receives from the prospective client an 
acknowledgment signed and dated by the prospective client stating that 
the client received a disclosure document for the trading program 
pursuant to which the trading advisor will direct his account or will 
guide his trading.

    11. Section 4.32 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph 
(a)(2) to read as follows:


Sec. 4.32  Recordkeeping.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (2) The acknowledgement specified in Sec. 4.31(b).
* * * * *
    12. Sections 4.33, 4.34 and 4.35 are proposed to be added as 
follows:


Sec. 4.33  General disclosures required.

    Except as otherwise provided herein, a disclosure document must 
include the following information.
    (a) Cautionary statement. The following Cautionary Statement, must 
be prominently displayed on the cover page of the disclosure document:

    THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE 
MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS TRADING PROGRAM NOR HAS THE 
COMMISSION PASSED ON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE 
DOCUMENT.

    (b) Risk disclosure statement. (1) The following Risk Disclosure 
Statement must be prominently displayed immediately following any 
disclosures required to appear on the cover page of the disclosure 
document as provided by the Commission or any applicable federal or 
state securities laws and regulations:

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

    THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITIES CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. YOU 
SHOULD THEREFORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE 
FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION. IN CONSIDERING WHETHER 
TO TRADE OR TO AUTHORIZE SOMEONE ELSE TO TRADE FOR YOU, YOU SHOULD 
BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING:
    IF YOU PURCHASE A COMMODITY OPTION YOU MAY SUSTAIN A TOTAL LOSS 
OF THE PREMIUM AND OF ALL TRANSACTION COSTS.
    IF YOU PURCHASE OR SELL A COMMODITY FUTURE OR SELL A COMMODITY 
OPTION YOU MAY SUSTAIN A TOTAL LOSS OF THE INITIAL MARGIN FUNDS AND 
ANY ADDITIONAL FUNDS THAT YOU DEPOSIT WITH YOUR BROKER TO ESTABLISH 
OR MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION. IF THE MARKET MOVES AGAINST YOUR 
POSITION, YOU MAY BE CALLED UPON BY YOUR BROKER TO DEPOSIT A 
SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL MARGIN FUNDS, ON SHORT NOTICE, IN 
ORDER TO MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION. IF YOU DO NOT PROVIDE THE REQUESTED 
FUNDS WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME, YOUR POSITION MAY BE LIQUIDATED AT 
A LOSS, AND YOU WILL BE LIABLE FOR ANY RESULTING DEFICIT IN YOUR 
ACCOUNT.
    UNDER CERTAIN MARKET CONDITIONS, YOU MAY FIND IT DIFFICULT OR 
IMPOSSIBLE TO LIQUIDATE A POSITION. THIS CAN OCCUR, FOR EXAMPLE, 
WHEN THE MARKET MAKES A ``LIMIT MOVE.''
    THE PLACEMENT OF CONTINGENT ORDERS BY YOU OR YOUR TRADING 
ADVISOR, SUCH AS A ``STOP-LOSS'' OR ``STOP-LIMIT'' ORDER, WILL NOT 
NECESSARILY LIMIT YOUR LOSSES TO THE INTENDED AMOUNTS, SINCE MARKET 
CONDITIONS MAY MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO EXECUTE SUCH ORDERS.
    A ``SPREAD'' POSITION MAY NOT BE LESS RISKY THAN A SIMPLE 
``LONG'' OR ``SHORT'' POSITION.
    THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN OBTAINABLE IN 
COMMODITY TRADING CAN WORK AGAINST YOU AS WELL AS FOR YOU. THE USE 
OF LEVERAGE CAN LEAD TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS.
    IN SOME CASES, MANAGED COMMODITY ACCOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO 
SUBSTANTIAL CHARGES FOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORY FEES. IT MAY BE 
NECESSARY FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THESE CHARGES TO 
MAKE SUBSTANTIAL TRADING PROFITS TO AVOID DEPLETION OR EXHAUSTION OF 
THEIR ASSETS. THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CONTAINS, AT PAGE (insert 
page number), A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF EACH FEE TO BE CHARGED TO 
YOUR ACCOUNT BY THE COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR AND A STATEMENT OF THE 
PERCENTAGE RETURN NECESSARY TO BREAK EVEN, THAT IS, TO RECOVER THE 
AMOUNT OF YOUR INITIAL INVESTMENT, AT PAGE (insert page number).
    THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL THE RISKS AND OTHER 
SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE COMMODITY MARKETS. YOU SHOULD THEREFORE 
CAREFULLY STUDY THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT AND COMMODITY TRADING 
BEFORE YOU TRADE, INCLUDING THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL RISK 
FACTORS OF THIS INVESTMENT, AT PAGE (insert page number).

    (2) If the commodity trading advisor may trade foreign futures or 
options contracts, the Risk Disclosure Statement must further state the 
following:

    YOU SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT THIS COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR MAY 
ENGAGE IN TRADING FOREIGN FUTURES OR OPTIONS CONTRACTS. TRANSACTIONS 
ON MARKETS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING MARKETS 
FORMALLY LINKED TO A UNITED STATES MARKET MAY BE SUBJECT TO 
REGULATIONS WHICH OFFER DIFFERENT OR DIMINISHED PROTECTION. FURTHER, 
UNITED STATES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES MAY BE UNABLE TO COMPEL THE 
ENFORCEMENT OF THE RULES OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OR MARKETS IN 
NON-UNITED STATES JURISDICTIONS WHERE YOUR TRANSACTIONS MAY BE 
EFFECTED. BEFORE YOU TRADE YOU SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT ANY RULES 
RELEVANT TO YOUR PARTICULAR CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTIONS AND ASK THE 
FIRM WITH WHICH YOU INTEND TO TRADE FOR DETAILS ABOUT THE TYPES OF 
REDRESS AVAILABLE IN BOTH YOUR LOCAL AND OTHER RELEVANT 
JURISDICTIONS.

    (3) If the commodity trading advisor is not also a registered 
futures commission merchant, the trading advisor must make the 
additional following statement in the Risk Disclosure Statement, 
prominently disclosed as the last paragraph thereof:

    THIS COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR IS PROHIBITED BY LAW FROM 
ACCEPTING FUNDS IN THE TRADING ADVISOR'S NAME FROM A CLIENT FOR 
TRADING COMMODITY INTERESTS. YOU MUST PLACE ALL FUNDS FOR TRADING IN 
THIS TRADING PROGRAM DIRECTLY WITH A FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANT.

    (c) Table of contents. A table of contents showing, by subject 
matter, the location of the disclosures made in the disclosure document 
must appear immediately following the Risk Disclosure Statement.
    (d) Information required in the forepart of the document. (1) The 
name, address of the main business office, main business telephone 
number and form of organization of the commodity trading advisor. If 
the mailing address of the main business office is a post office box 
number or is not within the United States, the trading advisor must 
state where its books and records will be kept and made available for 
inspection; and
    (2) The date when the disclosure document will first be used.
    (e) The name of. (1) Each principal of the trading advisor;
    (2) The futures commission merchant with which the commodity 
trading advisor will require the client to maintain its account or, if 
the client is free to choose the futures commission merchant with which 
it will maintain its account, the commodity trading advisor must make a 
statement to that effect; and
    (3) The introducing broker through which the commodity trading 
advisor will require the client to introduce its account or, if the 
client is free to choose the introducing broker through which it will 
introduce its account, the commodity trading advisor must make a 
statement to that effect.
    (f) Business background. (1) The business background, for the five 
years preceding the date of the document, of:
    (i) The commodity trading advisor; and
    (ii) Each principal of the trading advisor who participates in 
making trading or operational decisions for the trading advisor or 
supervises persons so engaged.
    (2) The trading advisor must include in the description of the 
business background of each such person the name and main business of 
that person's employers, business associations or business ventures and 
the nature of the duties performed by such person for the employers or 
in connection with the associations or ventures.
    (g) Principal risk factors. As applicable, a discussion of the 
principal risk factors of this trading program. This discussion must 
include, without limitation, risks due to volatility, leverage, and 
counterparty risks.
    (h) Trading program. A description of the trading program. This 
description shall include the types of commodity interests and other 
interests the commodity trading advisor intends to trade, with a 
description of any restrictions or limitations on such trading 
established by the commodity trading advisor.
    (i) Fees. A complete description of each fee which the commodity 
trading advisor will charge the client.
    (1) Wherever possible, the trading advisor must specify the dollar 
amount of each such fee.
    (2) Where any fee is determined by reference to a base amount 
including, but not limited to, ``net assets,'' ``gross profits,'' ``net 
profits'' or ``net gains,'' the trading advisor must specifically 
explain how such base amount will be calculated.
    (3) Where any fee is based on an increase in the value of the 
client's commodity interest account, the trading advisor must specify 
how that increase is calculated, the period of time during which the 
increase is calculated, the fee to be charged at the end of that period 
and the value of the account at which payment of the fee commences.
    (j) Conflicts of interest. (1) A full description of any actual or 
potential conflicts of interest regarding any aspect of the trading 
program on the part of:
    (i) The commodity trading advisor;
    (ii) Any futures commission merchant with which the client will be 
required to maintain its commodity interest account;
    (iii) Any introducing broker through which the client will be 
required to introduce its account to a futures commission merchant.
    (2) Any principal of the foregoing.
    (k) Litigation. (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (k)(2) 
of this section, any material administrative, civil or criminal action, 
whether pending or concluded, within five years preceding the date of 
the document, against any of the following persons, except a concluded 
action that resulted in an adjudication on the merits in favor of such 
person:
    (i) The commodity trading advisor and any principal thereof:
    (ii) The futures commission merchant with which the client will be 
required to maintain its commodity interest account; and
    (iii) The introducing broker through which the client will be 
required to introduce its account to the futures commission merchant.
    (2) With respect to the futures commission merchant and the 
introducing broker, an action will be considered material if:
    (i) The action would be required to be disclosed in the notes to 
the futures commission merchant's or introducing broker's financial 
statements prepared pursuant to generally accepted accounting 
principles;
    (ii) The action was brought by the Commission, Provided, however, 
That a concluded action that did not result in fines exceeding $50,000 
need not be disclosed unless it involved allegations of fraud or 
willful misconduct; or
    (iii) The action was brought by any other federal or state 
regulatory agency, or by a self-regulatory organization, domestic or 
foreign, and involves allegations of fraud or other willful misconduct.
    (l) Trading for own account. If the commodity trading advisor or 
any principal thereof trades or intends to trade commodity interests 
for its own account, the commodity trading advisor must disclose 
whether clients will be permitted to inspect the records of such 
person's trading and any written policies related to such trading.
    (m) Performance disclosures as set forth in Sec. 4.34
    (n) Voluntary Information. If any information, other than that 
required by the Commission, the antifraud provisions of the Act, or any 
federal or state securities laws and regulations, is provided, such 
information:
    (1) May not be misleading in content or presentation or 
inconsistent with the required disclosures;
    (2) Shall be subject to the antifraud provisions of the Act and the 
regulations thereunder, and to rules regarding the use of promotional 
material promulgated by a registered futures association, pursuant to 
section 17(j) of the Act; and
    (3) May only appear following the related required disclosures, 
unless otherwise specified.
    (o) Material information. This section does not relieve a commodity 
trading advisor from any obligation under the Act or the regulations 
thereunder, including the obligation to disclose all material 
information to existing or prospective clients even if the information 
is not specifically required by this section.


Sec. 4.34  Performance disclosures.

    (a) General principles. (1) The performance of the program offered 
must be displayed first, calculated in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting principles as specified below or by a method 
otherwise approved by the Commission, in a table showing at least 
quarterly the following information.
    (i) The beginning net asset value for the period, which shall 
represent the previous period's ending net asset value;
    (ii) All additions, whether voluntary or involuntary, during the 
period;
    (iii) All withdrawals and redemptions, whether voluntary or 
involuntary, during the period;
    (iv) The net performance for the period, which shall represent the 
change in the net asset value net of additions, withdrawals, 
redemptions, fees and expenses;
    (v) The ending net asset value for the period, which shall 
represent the beginning net asset value plus or minus additions, 
withdrawals and redemptions, and net performance;
    (vi) The rate of return for the period, computed on a compounded 
monthly basis, which shall be calculated by dividing the net 
performance by the beginning net asset value;
    (2) The performance of all other programs must be presented as set 
forth in Sec. 4.25(a)(1)(ii)(C) through (G) and must be based on the 
information set forth in Sec. 4.34(a)(1), and calculated on a current 
basis. The commodity trading advisor must maintain all supporting 
documents necessary to substantiate such calculation in accordance with 
Sec. 1.31.
    (3) All performance information presented in the disclosure 
document must be current as of a date not more than three months 
preceding the date of the document.
    (4) All required performance information must be presented for the 
most recent five calendar years and year-to-date or for its entire 
duration, if less than five years.
    (5) Unless such presentation would be misleading, the performance 
of accounts traded pursuant to the same trading program may be 
presented in a single composite table provided that the trading advisor 
describes how each composite was calculated. The term trading program 
means a trading strategy differentiated from others by commodity 
trading methodology, degree of risk or degree of leverage.
    (6) The performance of any account in which the commodity trading 
advisor, any of its principals or any person providing services to the 
pool owns or controls fifty percent or more of the beneficial interests 
shall not be included in a disclosure document unless such performance 
is prominently labeled as proprietary and set forth separately after 
all required disclosures.
    (7) Any past performance presentation, whether required or 
voluntarily provided, must be preceded with the following statement, 
prominently displayed:

    PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT PREDICTIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

    (b) Performance to be disclosed. The commodity trading advisor must 
disclose the actual performance of all accounts directed by the 
commodity trading advisor and by each of its trading principals; 
Provided, however, That if the trading advisor or its trading 
principals previously have not directed any accounts, the trading 
advisor must prominently disclose this fact with one of the following 
statements, as applicable:

    (1) THIS TRADING ADVISOR PREVIOUSLY HAS NOT DIRECTED ANY 
ACCOUNTS; or
    (2) NONE OF THE TRADING PRINCIPALS OF THIS TRADING ADVISOR HAS 
PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED ANY ACCOUNTS; or
    (3) NEITHER THIS TRADING ADVISOR NOR ITS TRADING PRINCIPALS HAVE 
PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED ANY ACCOUNTS.


Sec. 4.35  Use, amendment and filing of disclosure document.

    (a) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, all information 
contained in the disclosure document must be current as of the date of 
the document; Provided, however, That performance information must be 
current as of a date not more than three months preceding the date of 
the document.
    (b) No commodity trading advisor may use a disclosure document 
dated more than nine months prior to the date of its use.
    (c)(1) If the commodity trading advisor knows or should know that 
the disclosure document is materially inaccurate or incomplete in any 
respect, it must correct that defect and must distribute the correction 
to:
    (i) All existing clients in the trading program within 21 calendar 
days of the date upon which the trading advisor first knows or has 
reason to know of the defect; and
    (ii) Each previously solicited prospective client for the trading 
program prior to entering into an agreement to direct or to guide such 
prospective client's commodity interest account pursuant to the 
program. The trading advisor may furnish the correction by way of an 
amended document, a sticker on the document, or other similar means.
    (2) The trading advisor may not use the document until such 
correction is made.
    (d)(1) The commodity trading advisor must file with the Commission 
two copies of the disclosure document for each trading program that it 
offers or that it intends to offer not less than 21 calendar days prior 
to the date the trading advisor first intends to deliver the document 
to a prospective client in the trading program.
    (2) The commodity trading advisor must file with the Commission two 
copies of all subsequent amendments to the disclosure document for each 
trading program that it offers or that it intends to offer within 21 
calendar days of the date upon which the trading advisor first knows or 
has reason to know of the defect requiring the amendment.

PART 30--FOREIGN FUTURES AND FOREIGN OPTIONS TRANSACTIONS

    13. The authority citation for part 30 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 4, 6, 6c, and 12a.

    14. Section 30.6 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs 
(b)(1) and (b)(2) to read as follows:


Sec. 30.6  Disclosure.

* * * * *
    (b) Commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors. (1) No 
commodity pool operator registered or required to be registered under 
this part, or exempt from registration pursuant to Sec. 30.5 of this 
part, may, directly or indirectly, solicit, accept or receive funds, 
securities or other property from a prospective participant in a 
foreign pool that it operates or that it intends to operate or, in the 
case of a commodity trading advisor, no commodity trading advisor 
registered or required to be registered under this part, or exempt from 
registration pursuant to Sec. 30.5 of this part, may solicit or enter 
into an agreement with a prospective client to direct or to guide the 
client's foreign commodity interest trading by means of a systematic 
program that recommends specific transactions, unless the commodity 
pool operator or commodity trading advisor, at or before the time it 
engages in such activities, first provides each prospective participant 
or client with the Risk Disclosure Statement set forth in Sec. 4.24(b) 
in the case of a commodity pool operator or Sec. 4.33(b) in the case of 
a commodity trading advisor.
    (2) The disclosure statement required to be provided in paragraph 
(b)(1) of this section may be given as a separate document or, if part 
of the disclosure document required to be furnished customers or 
potential customers pursuant to Sec. 4.21 or Sec. 4.31 of this chapter, 
must be prominently disclosed immediately following any disclosures 
required to appear on the cover page of the disclosure document as 
provided by the Commission or any applicable federal or state 
securities laws and regulations.
* * * * *

PART 150--LIMITS ON POSITIONS

    15. The authority citation for part 150 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6a, 6c and 12a(5) (1988).

    16. Section 150.3 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph 
(a)(4)(i)(D) to read as follows:


Sec. 150.3  Exemptions.

    (a) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) Solicit funds for such trading by separate disclosure documents 
that meet the standards of Sec. 4.24 or Sec. 4.33 of this chapter, as 
applicable, where such disclosure documents are required under part 4 
of this chapter.
* * * * *
    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 1994, by the Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 94-11380 Filed 5-13-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P