[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-7046]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: March 25, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG94-36-000, et al.]

 

2285241 Nova Scotia Ltd., et al; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Regulation Filings

March 16, 1994.
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. 2285241 Nova Scotia Limited

[Docket No. EG94-36-000]

    On March 10, 1994, 2285241 Nova Scotia Limited (``GP Sub'') (c/o 
Mary Ann Ralls, Reid & Priest, 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20004) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission an application for determination of exempt wholesale 
generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission's Regulations.
    GP Sub states in its application that it is a Nova Scotia 
corporation formed to acquire a general partnership interest in 
Brooklyn Energy Limited Partnership, a Nova Scotia limited partnership 
formed to own an electric and steam generating facility to be located 
in Brooklyn, the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Comment date: April 5, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

2. LG&E-Westmoreland Southampton

[Docket Nos. QF88-84-005 and EL94-45-000]

    On February 23, 1994, LG&E-Westmoreland Southampton (Applicant), 
filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a 
temporary waiver of the operating standard, and an application for 
recertification, of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility 
pursuant to Secs. 292.205(c) and 202.207, respectively, of the 
Commission's Regulations. No determination has been made that the 
submittal constitutes a complete filing.
    According to applicant, the 62.64 MW topping-cycle cogeneration 
facility, which is located in Southampton County, Virginia, consists of 
two stoker-fired boilers and an extraction/condensing steam turbine 
generator. The primary energy source is coal. The facility was placed 
in service on March 7, 1992.
    Applicant states that the temporary waiver is requested due to: (1) 
Start-up problems in calendar year 1992, (2) the difficulty of 
producing extraction steam at a sufficient pressure during low electric 
loads, and (3) operating company personnel error.
    Comment date: Thirty days after publication in the Federal 
Register, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this 
notice.

3. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation

[Docket No. QF94-76-000]

    On March 9, 1994, Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation 
(Temple-Inland) of 303 S. Temple Drive, Diboll, Texas 75941, submitted 
for filing an application for certification of a facility as a 
qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to Sec. 292.207(b) of the 
Commission's Regulations. No determination has been made that the 
submittal constitutes a complete filing.
    According to the applicant, the topping-cycle cogeneration facility 
is located at the Temple-Inland Bleached Pulp and Paperboard operation 
in Evadale, Texas, and will consist of three recovery boilers, two 
biomass gas-fired boilers, a natural-gas-fired boiler and two steam 
turbine generators. The net electric power production capacity is 30.6 
MW. Thermal energy recovered from the facility used for process 
purposes in the papermill.
    Comment date: Thirty days after publication in the Federal 
Register, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this 
notice.

Standard Paragraphs

    E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-7046 Filed 3-24-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P