[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-5786] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: March 14, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Use of Bait in Hunting AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice; adoption of interim policy; request for public comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Forest Service gives notice that it is issuing interim policy on the agency's role in regulating the placement of bait on National Forest System lands. The intended effect is to clarify the agency's role in relation to the role of the States and, thus, to provide a consistent approach to the regulation of baiting resident game. Public comment is invited and will be considered in the adoption of a final policy, notice of which will be published in the Federal Register. DATES: Interim Directive No. 2640-94-1 was effective on March 3, 1994, and will expire no later than September 4, 1995, unless removed before that date. Comments must be received by May 13, 1994. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Director, Wildlife and Fisheries (2640), Forest Service, USDA, P.O. Box 96090, Washington, DC 20090- 6090. The public may inspect comments received on this interim policy in the Office of the Director, Wildlife and Fisheries, 4th floor Southwest Wing, Auditors Building, 205 14th Street SW., Washington, DC. Those wishing to inspect comments should call ahead at (202) 205-1207 to facilitate entry into the building. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Darden, Wildlife and Fisheries Staff, (202) 205-1207. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: State fish and wildlife agencies have the primary responsibility for protection and management of wildlife populations on National Forest System lands, including adoption of State fish and wildlife laws and regulations affecting the taking of resident game animals. The Forest Service enters into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with each State which governs Forest Service/State cooperation on matters of Statewide fish and wildlife policy or procedure affecting the National Forest System. See FSM 2611.1. The States issue regulations regarding hunting licenses, methods, seasons, locations, and bag limits for resident game and have the primary responsibility for enforcement of fish and wildlife laws and regulations on National Forest System lands. Federal land management statutes acknowledge the States' traditional role in managing fish and wildlife; see the National Forest System Organic Administration Act at 16 U.S.C. 480, the Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Act at 16 U.S.C. 528, the Sikes Act at 16 U.S.C. 670h, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, at 43 U.S.C. 1732. The Forest Service therefore is generally reluctant to override State fish and wildlife regulation, except where federal interests, such as protection of forest land, resources, and users require federal intervention. The practice of placing bait (food or scent to attract wildlife) is a hunting activity allowed by some State laws and regulations. The baiting of bears is particularly controversial. While the total number of States allowing bear baiting has declined, State fish and wildlife agencies permit the baiting of black bear as a hunting activity in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The Forest Service intends to work diligently through its ongoing cooperative efforts to encourage the States to evaluate their regulation of the practice of baiting bears. In the meantime, the agency is issuing interim policy regarding the use of bait on National Forest System lands. In the past, some national forests have regulated the placement of bear baits by requiring hunters and commercial guides to obtain special use authorizations in order to prevent conflicts with other users or other problems associated with the location and removal of bait. Additionally, some Forest Service Regions have issued orders under 36 CFR Part 261 to control litter, as well as to close certain areas to bear baiting where the practice would create unacceptable adverse effects on other resources or forest users. In early 1992, the Forest Service's role in the regulation of bear baiting on the national forests in Wyoming became an issue. Special use authorizations for bear baiting had been issued on a number of national forests in that State. Typically, those special use authorizations included conditions with which the holder had to comply to minimize adverse effects created by placement of bear bait. In March 1992, the Regional Foresters for the Rocky Mountain and Intermountain Regions issued a joint closure order prohibiting bear baiting in the national forests in Wyoming, unless the baiting activity was conducted in compliance with the requirements of the order pertaining to the placement and disposal of baits. Like the conditions that previously had been included in special use authorizations, the requirements of the order were intended too minimize adverse effects on forest resources and users. The Fund for Animals and the Friends of the Bow brought suit to challenge the Forest Service's closure order and to challenge what Plaintiffs considered a shift in established policy, that is, no longer requiring special use authorizations for bear bait placement and using closure orders instead (The Fund for Animals v. Robertson, (D.D.C. Civ. No. 92-1694-TPJ)). These groups perceived this shift in method as a diminution in the level of Forest Service regulation and wildlife protection. The parties settled the case upon the Forest Service's decision to rescind the closure order and, in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, to analyze the effects of eliminating the practice of issuing special use authorizations for the placement of bear bait on National Forest System lands in Wyoming. The Regions then prepared an Environmental Assessment to disclose effects on the proposed action and alternatives to the proposal. Upon completion of the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Decision Notice by the Rocky Mountain and Intermountain Regional Foresters in April 1993, there were new challenges to the agency's position. Subsequently, the Deputy Chief for the National Forest System decided that national direction was needed to end the conflict and controversy. Accordingly, the Decision Notice was rescinded, and bear baiting in national forests in Wyoming was prohibited pending issuance of national direction. However, because the spring hunting season will begin before a final policy can be adopted, the agency has determined that in fairness to outfitters, guides, and individual hunters, an interim policy should be issued to ensure consistency and uniformity of policy and practice by the Forest Service. State agency regulations have been developed and published in Wyoming and other States governing the use of bait in spring hunts for 1994. These new Wyoming regulations were developed in close coordination with the Forest Service to be in concert with federal regulation and law on the national forests involved and to be protective of National Forest System resources. In addition, hunters, outfitters, and guides in Wyoming have moved forward with the normal practice of planning and booking hunting activity based on the expectation that the Forest Service would have a final policy in place for the spring hunting season. It is unfair to continue the bear baiting prohibition in Wyoming when such a prohibition is not in effect on other National Forest System lands in other States where the practice is permitted, because of the agency's delay in adopting a final policy. Therefore, the agency has issued an interim directive to Forest Service Manual Chapter 2640, which is set out at the end of this notice. The Forest Service special use authorization regulations at 36 CFR 251.50 exempt noncommercial use and occupancy, including ``hunting,'' from the special use authorization requirement. Since hunting methods subject to State regulation are included within the term ``hunting,'' the interim directive makes explicit that where State regulations permit baiting, the Forest Service will not require a special use authorization for the practice of baiting connected with hunting on National Forest System lands. Outfitter and guide activities require a special use authorization. Outfitters and guides must comply with applicable State laws and regulations, and Forest Service closure orders as a condition of special use authorizations. However, if the placement of bait should become a land or resource management issue and it is determined that the State regulations governing baiting would not protect resources in an area adequately or would otherwise be inconsistent with the applicable forest plan or conflict with federal laws such as the Endangered Species Act, then the authorized officer will issue an order to close the area to baiting. The authorized officer also may close an area to baiting considering the likely impact on a site-specific basis on water quality, public health and sanitation, or the potential threat to the viability of wildlife. Finally, the policy would explicitly prohibit the issuance of a special use authorization to individuals for the specific act of placing bait on National Forest System lands for hunting purposes. The approach adopted in the interim policy maintains protection of national forest resources. First, under the terms of the Memorandums of Understanding with the State fish and wildlife or game agencies, the Forest Service continuously participates in the review and adoption of State game regulations as they affect National Forest System land or resources. Second, the interim policy provides the Regional Forester or Forest Supervisor with the flexibility and discretion to determine if baiting should be prohibited in a specific location. Finally, if a hunter, in placing bait to attract resident game creates litter through improper placement or untimely removal of bait in violation of State regulations or Forest Service closure orders, the agency has the authority under its regulations at 36 CFR 261.11 to cite the hunter for violating the prohibition on litter. If such bait results in violation of State regulations, the agency has authority to cite the hunter for violation of 36 CFR 261.8, and agency employees routinely do so where such violations occur. In short, the agency's approach (1) relies on existing relationships with each State, (2) prevents duplicative regulation by Federal and State agencies, and (3) provides site- specific environmental safeguards to address those situations where baiting would have an adverse site-specific effect on National Forest System land or resources. Pursuant to the rules at 36 CFR part 316, the text of the baiting policy as it has been issued in Interim Directive No. 2640-94-1 to the Forest Service Manual is set out at the end of this notice. Public comment is invited and will be considered in adoption of a final policy. Environmental Impact Section 31.1b(2) of Forest Service Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR 43180, September 18, 1992) excludes from documentation in an environmental assessment or impact statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to establish Servicewide administrative procedures, program processes, or instructions.'' This interim directive would provide administrative instructions to Forest Service field offices on the procedures and processes to follow in the case of baiting resident game. Accordingly, the agency's preliminary assessment is that this policy falls within this category of actions and that no extraordinary circumstances exist which would require preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. A final determination will be made upon adoption of the final policy. Controlling Paperwork Burden on the Public This policy will not result in additional paperwork. Therefore, the review provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3507) and implementing regulations at 5 CFR Part 1320 do not apply. Regulatory Impact This interim policy has been reviewed under USDA procedures and Executive Order 12866 on Federal Regulations. It has been determined that this is not a significant rule. Dated: March 7, 1994. Jack Ward Thomas, Chief. FOREST SERVICE MANUAL Washington, D.C. Interim Directive: !!ID 2640-94-1 Effective Date: Expiration Date: Chapter: 2640--Stocking and Harvesting Posting Notice: Remove: This directive clarifies roles, responsibilities, and procedures to regulate the placement of bait on National Forest System lands. FSM 2643 emphasizes the cooperation between the Forest Service and State fish and wildlife agencies through memorandums of understanding. FSM 2643.1 clarifies the States' role and emphasizes the need for consistency of State regulations with Federal laws and forest plans. FSM 2643.12 adds factors to consider and methods to regulate baiting. 2643--Applicability of State Fish and Wildlife Laws and Regulations The Forest Service actively cooperates in the development of State fish and wildlife laws and regulations and may assist in the enforcement of State fish and wildlife laws on National Forest System lands. Pursuant to FSM 2610, Regional Foresters shall ensure that memorandums with State fish and wildlife agencies recognize the role of the Forest Service in cooperating in the development of State fish and wildlife laws and regulations, especially those addressing hunting, fishing, and trapping as they would apply to occupancy and use of National Forest System lands. 2643.1--Hunting, Fishing, and Trapping Regulations Hunting, fishing, and trapping of fish and wildlife and associated practices are permitted on National Forest System lands subjects to State fish and wildlife laws and regulations, unless one or both of the following apply: 1. State fish and wildlife laws and regulations conflict with federal laws; or 2. State laws and regulations would permit activities that conflict with the land and resource management responsibilities of the Forest Service or that are inconsistent with forest plans. 2643.12--Trapping Furbearers Use of Bait for Resident Game Hunting. The use of bait as a lure or attractant for the purpose of taking resident game on National Forest System lands is considered a hunting practice subject to State regulation. Where State hunting regulations prohibit the use of bait, the practice is prohibited on National Forest System lands. Where States permit the use of bait for attracting resident game, this activity is allowed on National Forest System lands, subject to State hunting laws and regulations, unless the authorized officer determines on a site-specific basis that there is a need to prohibit or restrict the practice of baiting because one or more of the following circumstances exist: 1. The State laws and regulations on placement of bait are inadequate to protect forest land or other resources or users in a particular location and/or to prevent trespass or litter; 2. Baiting is inconsistent with the applicable forest plan; or 3. The State law and regulations conflict with Federal law, such as the Endangered Species Act. In addition to the mandatory causes for prohibiting or restricting baiting, the authorized officer also may prohibit baiting, regardless of the adequacy of State regulations, based on consideration of the likely impact of baiting on such matters as water quality, public health and sanitation, the potential for litter, or the potential to threaten the viability of wildlife. Where the authorized officer determines that baiting is a significant problem and should be restricted or prohibited: 1. The officer shall notify State fish and wildlife officials and provide them the opportunity to resolve the issue through further restrictions or the prohibition through State regulation rather than for the Forest Service to issue the restriction or prohibition. 2. If the State does not revise its regulations to adequately regulate or restrict baiting, the Forest Service authorized officer shall, time permitting, close the area or otherwise restrict baiting by issuing an order pursuant to 36 CFR part 261. Where time does not permit closure of an area to baiting because the hunting season is underway and it would be impracticable to issue a closure order, the Regional Forester or Forest Supervisor shall take such mitigation and/or enforcement measures as are appropriate and practicable to ensure consistency with forest plan management direction and compliance with Federal laws, orders, and regulations, and protection of forest users and resources. For example, the agency may close a road or gate, or cite violations of other State or Forest Service regulations. Closure is not the only way to address the practice of baiting. It is expected that land managers as part of their day-to-day management of National Forest System lands and resources will be cognizant of the effects of hunting activities and take such proactive measures, after consultation with the responsible fish and wildlife agency, such as hunter education, as may be necessary to ensure resource protection consistent with forest plan management direction. This policy, in and of itself, does not compel an authorized officer to undertake a specific decision or to make a determination of whether baiting is allowed in those States where the practice is permitted. Special use authorization shall not be issued for placing bait on National Forest System lands for hunting purposes (36 CFR 251.50(c)). For the purposes of this section and to assure consistency in coordination of national forest wildlife matters with State agencies, the authorized officer is the Regional Forester or Forest Supervisor responsible for executing memorandums of understanding with the State wildlife agency. [FR Doc. 94-5786 Field 3-11-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-11-M