[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 1994)] [Notices] [Pages 338-340] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-48] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: January 4, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Rel. No. IC-19983; 812-8726] NBD Bank, N.A. et al.; Application December 27, 1993. AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``SEC'' or ``Commission''). ACTION: Notice of application for permanent order under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act''). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANTS: NBD Bank, N.A. (``NBD''), NBD Bank, and NBD Bancorp, Inc. RELEVANT ACT SECTIONS: Permanent order requested under 9(c) for an exemption from the provisions of section 9(a). SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: On December 17, 1993, the Commission issued a conditional temporary order and notice of application for permanent order under section 9(c) of the Act exempting applicants from the disqualification provisions of section 9(a) solely with respect to a securities-related injunction entered against NBD.\1\ Applicants have discovered that the application, and consequently the notice, contains a factual misstatement with respect to the composition of the board of trustees of the Woodward Funds and Renaissance Assets Trust. Applicants have filed an amended application to correct the misstatement. \1\Investment Company Act Release No. 19961 (Dec. 17, 1993). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FILING DATE: The application was filed on December 17, 1993, and amended on December 23, 1993. HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: Interested persons may request a hearing on the application by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on January 18, 1994, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the SEC's Secretary. ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549; Applicants, NBD and NBD Bancorp, Inc., 611 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48266. NBD Bank, 211 South Wheaton Avenue, Wheaton, Illinois 60189. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John V. O'Hanlon, Senior Attorney, at (202) 272-3922, or Elizabeth G. Osterman, Branch Chief, at (202) 272-3016 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from the SEC's Public Reference Branch. Applicants' Representations 1. NBD is a national banking association and a wholly-owned subsidiary of NBD Bancorp, Inc. NBD serves as investment adviser to The Woodward Funds and Renaissance Assets Trust (the ``Funds''). The Funds are open-end management investment companies registered under the Act. The Woodward Funds consist of thirteen separate portfolios: Woodward Growth/Value Fund; Woodward Opportunity Fund; Woodward Intrinsic Value Fund; Woodward Equity Index Fund; Woodward Intermediate Bond Fund; Woodward Bond Fund; Woodward Money Market Fund; Woodward Government Fund; Woodward Treasury Money Market Fund; Woodward Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund; Woodward Michigan Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund; Woodward Municipal Bond Fund; and Woodward Michigan Municipal Bond Fund. It is anticipated that additional portfolios will commence operation at calendar year-end 1993 or shortly thereafter. Renaissance Assets Trust consists of two separate portfolios: the Renaissance Government Fund and the Renaissance Money Market Fund. 2. NBD Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NBD Illinois, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NBD Bancorp. NBD Bank is not currently an investment adviser to any registered investment company. NBD Bank has entered into an agreement to act as sub-investment adviser to the Separate Account I (the ``Separate Account'') of the Washington National Life Insurance Company (``Washington National''). 3. NBD Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company incorporated under Delaware law. 4. On December 17, 1993, the Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in a civil action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Comerica Bank (the ``SEC'' Action''). The complaint alleged that NBD violated Regulation U, as promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under section 7(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in connection with extensions of credit in a custodial trust account maintained for an individual named Mark Sendo.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\The Commission brought an action against Sendo and two of his associates for ``free-riding''--paying for purchases of securities with anticipated proceeds from offsetting sales of the same securities--in violation of the antifraud and margin provisions of the federal securities laws in June 1991. SEC v. Sendo, Burman and Tringale, 91 Civ. 4408 (S.D.N.Y.), Litigation Release No. 12894 (Jun. 27, 1991). Summary judgment was rendered in favor of the Commission in October 1992. Litigation Release No. 13475 (Dec. 17, 1992). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. On the same day, NBD consented to the entry of a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief (the ``Final Judgment''), without admitting or denying any of the allegations in the Commission's complaint except as to jurisdiction. The Final Judgment enjoins NBD from further violations of Regulation U. The Final Judgment requires that NBD disgorge $2,500, which represents its gross custodian services fees earned on Sendo's accounts. In addition, the Final Judgment requires NBD to pay a civil money penalty of $100,000. The Final Judgment also requires NBD to adopt internal procedures designed to prevent a recurrence of the violative conduct. 6. Applicants have been advised by the trustees of the Funds and by Washington National that (a) the trustees of the Funds and the directors of Washington National have reviewed the circumstances pertinent to the Final Judgment, and, in the case of the Funds, have considered the prior services rendered to the Funds by NBD; and (b) after review and consideration of such factors as they deemed appropriate, a majority of the trustees of the Woodward Funds who are not interested persons with respect to applicants, a majority of the trustees of Renaissance Assets Trust who are not interested persons with respect to applicants, and the directors of Washington National have determined that the retention of NBD in the case of the Funds and of NBD Bank in the case of Washington National as investment adviser is in the best interests of the Funds' shareholders and the account holders of the Separate Account. 7. In making the application, applicants acknowledge, understand, and agree that the application and any temporary exemption issued by the Commission shall be without prejudice to the Commission's consideration of any application for exemptions from statutory requirements, including the consideration of the instant application for a permanent exemption pursuant to section 9(c) or the revocation or removal of any temporary exemption granted in connection with the application. Applicants' Legal Analysis 1. Applicants seek a permanent order exempting applicants and their affiliates from the provisions of section 9(a) of the Act solely with respect to the Final Judgment. 2. Section 9(a) of the Act, in pertinent part, disqualifies any person or company from serving or acting in the capacity of employee, officer, director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser, or depositor of any registered investment company, or principal underwriter for any registered open-end company, registered unit investment trust, or registered face amount certificate company if such person, or an affiliated person of such person, has, by reason of misconduct, been permanently or temporarily enjoined by an order, judgment, or decree from any court of competent jurisdiction from acting as an underwriter, broker, dealer, or investment adviser, or from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. 3. Section 9(c) provides that the Commission shall grant an application for an exemption from the disqualification provisions of section 9(a), either unconditionally or on an appropriate temporary or other conditional basis, if it is established that these provisions, as applied to the applicant, are unduly or disproportionately severe or that the conduct of the applicant has been such as not to make it against the public interest or protection of investors to grant such application. 4. As a result of the Final Judgment, NBD and its affiliated persons are subject to the disqualification provisions of section 9(a). Applicants assert that the application of such provisions to applicants is unduly and disproportionately severe. Applicants further assert that NBD's conduct has been such as not to make it against the public interest or protection of investors to grant the requested relief. 5. Applicants state that the conduct that gave rise to the Final Judgment was not in any way related to activities of applicants as investment advisers. Applicants further state that neither applicants' senior management nor anyone involved in the management of investment advisory services on applicants' behalf were involved in the activities giving rise to the SEC Action. 6. Applicants assert that denial of the requested order would cause irreparable injury to applicants and to the Funds' investors because the investors would no longer have the services of their investment adviser. In addition, investors could be harmed by the uncertainty caused by applicants being prohibited from serving as investment advisers to the Funds. 7. NBD has implemented policies and procedures designed to prevent a recurrence by other account holders of the type of conduct that gave rise to the SEC Action. In addition, pursuant to the Final Judgment, NBD has taken or will take the following steps to remedy its conduct and prevent the recurrence of violations: a. NBD will maintain policies and procedures to ensure that it complies with Regulation U, including policies to ensure that purchases of securities in custodial accounts are not paid for with proceeds from sales of the same securities in the accounts. b. Within thirty days after the entry of the Final Judgment, NBD will retain an independent consultant who will review NBD's custodial securities clearing operations and who will make such recommendations as are necessary with respect to NBD's policies and procedures to ensure that NBD complies with Regulation U. c. The consultant will issue a report within sixty days of its retention setting forth its findings and recommendations and will forward the report to the New York Regional Office.\3\ Unless the Commission objects to the consultant's recommendations within thirty days, applicants will implement the consultant's recommendations by no later than forty days after the end of the period for the Commission to object. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\Applicants state that in a report dated July 12, 1993, an independent consultant concluded that, based on its review, the policies and procedures of the custodian securities clearing operations for non-investment adviser accounts of NBD are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the requirements of Regulation U. Applicants state that the recommendations of the independent consultant have been implemented. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Applicants state that they have not been the subject of prior Commission enforcement proceedings, and have not previously filed an application for relief pursuant to section 9(c) of the Act. Applicants' Condition Applicants agree that any order granted by the Commission pursuant to the application will be subject to the condition that NBD will comply with the Final Judgment. For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, pursuant to delegated authority. Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 94-48 Filed 1-3-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-M