[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
COASTAL ZONE INFORMATION CENTER -2. ?j- .W38 1976 irk State Department of Environmental Conservation COASTAL ZONE JNFORMAT1tON CENTER REVISED DRAFT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN LONG ISLAND SOUND-ATLANTIC OCEAN (17) Property of CSC Librar7 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CENTER 2234 SOUTH HOBSON AVENUE CHARLESTON , SC 29405-2413 Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Land Resources and Forest Management December 1976 Grant Number: 04-5-158-50002 The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Federal Grant from the Office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, administered through the New York State Department of State, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as - m_ amended. C Lrfi =q FOREWORD This is New York State's official plan for pollution abatement in the Atlantic Ocean (17-01) Long Island Sound (17-02) Planning Area prepared by the Department of Environmental Conservation pursuant to Section 303 (e) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. The plan identifies pollution problems, treatment needs, priorities, schedules for pollution abatement and governs State and Federal grants-in-aid for any future treatment works and all permits issued under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. This is one of a series of basin water quality plans being prepared statewide to coordinate and direct the State's water quality decisions and to assure wise use and ~management of several billion dollars in public funds for pollution abatement during the next five years. This plan represents the first of a two-phase planning process that will ultimately deal with land use- water quality interrelationships and meet requirements for planning under both Sections 303(e) and 208 of PL 92-500. The plan was developed as an integral part of the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) and designated area 208 study programs to assure a coordinated water quality planning approach. State and local policies and plans on detailed aspects of water quality, water resources and land use management have been factored into this plan. To the extent of available resources, in this first phase of planning, inputs and contributions have been received from many levels of government, private concerns and from the general public at local public hearings on water quality standards and water quality related planning and construction programs. Basin plans are presented at local hearings before final approvals. Local input to the planning process will be further developed in Phase II through CZM and 208. Portions of the plan may be revised at any time based on public comments and concerns, changes in priority and needs for pollution abatement identified through studies being conducted under Section 208. This will include a continuous updating as permits are issued and as changes result in effluent limit evaluations and compliance schedules. The plan will also be revised, at least annually, updated and periodically aired at a public meeting or hearing. Also, accomplishments will be assessed and compared with State and National pollution control goals. Operating efficiencies of facilities will be examined. Long Island Sound - Atlantic Ocean Planning Area 17 303(e) Basin Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward Summary . ............... .1 I. Introduction 1. Scope and Purpose . . . . .................... . I-1 2. Process of Plan Formulation ................... I-1 3. Public Participation-Public Hearings. . . . . . . . . . . I-3 4. Updating The Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-4 5. Terminology . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . I-4 II. Background For Water Quality 1. Description of Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . II-1 2. Economy, Population and Land Use . . . . . . a . . . . . II-1 a. Population. ...........*............. II-3 b. Economy . ............... . II-5 c. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-5 1. Population ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-6 2. Economy........ ........................ II-6 3. Outlook ........................ II-7 d. Nassau-Suffolk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ II-9 1. Population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-9 2. Economy. . . . . . . . . . II-10 3� Outlook . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-11 e. Westchester County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-13 1. Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a v a . . . II-14 2. Economy . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . II-14 3. Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-16 f. Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .II-17 3. Planning Jurisdictions and Related Planning Activities . . . .. II-28 a. New York City Planning Commission .. . . . . . . . . . . II-29 b. County Planning Agencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-29 c. County Water Management and Planning . . . . . . . . . . 11-31 i Page d. Other County Environmental Management and Planning Activities . . . ................ 11-33 e. New York City Environmental Protection Administration....... II-35 f. Regional Planning in the New York Metropolitan Area.. . . . . ....II-36 g. Tri-State Regional Planning Commission. . ......... 11-37 h. Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Commission and Marine Resources Council . . . ........... II-38 i. Regional Plan Association ................ . 11-39 j. Metropolitan Regional Council . . . . . . . . . . . II-40 k. Intergovernmental Planning Coordination Committee . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. ii-40 1. Other Special Function Regional Agencies Impacting Water Quality. . .. . 11-41 m. Interstate Water Pollution Control Agencies . . . ..... 11-42 n. Corps of Engineers Permits. . . . . . . . . . . . . II-43 o. New England River Basins Commission . . . . . 11-43 p. Delaware River Basin Commission . . . . II-44 q. Long Island Sound Study . . . ............... II-44 r. Northeastern Water Supply Study . . . ........... II-45 s. Commission On Water Supply Needs Of SoutheasternNew York.. . ................ II-46 t. Groundwater Studies on Long Island. . . . . . II-47 u. North Atlantic Regional Water Resources Study ....... 11-48 v. Coastal Zone Planning . . . . . . . . . II-48 w. Air Quality Planning ............... . 11-49 x. Solid Waste Management Planning . ... . . ........ II-49 y. Agricultural Land Preservation. . . . . . . . . . II-50 z. Soil and Water Conservation Planning. . . . . ....... i-51 aa. Small Watershed Plans .................. . II-52 ab. Shore Erosion Control.. ................. II-53 ac. Floodplain, Wetland and Special River Management and Protection . . . ............. II-53 ad. County and Local Environmental Conservation Commissions. . . . . . . 11-54 4, 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management ............ II-56 a. Authority and Regulations Governing 208 Planning ...... II-56 b. Purpose and Responsibilities for 208 Planning ....... II-58 c. 208 Studies Underway in Long Island- Atlantic Ocean Basin ... . . . II-59 d. Relationship of 208 Planning With Other Programs ..... II-59 1. Relationship Between 208 and 303(e) Basin Plans . . . II-59 2. Relationship Between 208 and 201 Facilities Plans . . . II-61 3. Relationship Between 208 and 209 Water Resources Plans .. . ...... . . . . . . II-61 4. Relationship Between 208 and 402 Permit Program . . . .I-61 5. Relationship Between 208 and Air Quality Programs . . . II-62 6. Relationship Between 208 and Solid Waste Programs . . . II-63 7. Relationship Between 208 and Other Areawide Management Programs . . . .............. 11-64 ii Page e. Nassau-Suffolk 208 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-64 f. New York City 208 Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-66 g. Westchester County 208 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . .. II-69 III. Hydrologic Profile 1. Stream Gaging Network. . ... . . . . . . . . .. I.II-1 2. Tide and Tidal Current Gaging Stations . . .. . . . . . . . . . III-1 3. Groundwater Gaging Network . . . . . .. . III-16 4. Precipitation - Temperature. . . . . . . . . . . . III-16 5. Hydrologic Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . III-16 IV. Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance 1. Surface Water Sampling Programs, . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1 V. Wastewater Sources and Plans For Abatement 1. Pollutant Sources, Characteristics, and Effluent Requirements.. . . . . . . . . . . . ..... V-1 a. Municipal Discharges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... V-1 b. Industrial Discharges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-18 Is c. Combined Sewers . ........ V-19 d. Thermal Discharges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-21 e. Oil and Grease . . . . . . . . . . . . .V-22 f. Dredge Spoil and Sewage Sludge Disposal . . . . ... V-24 g. Vessel Wastes.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... V-34 h. Duck Farms . . . .. . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . V-38 i. Radiological Wastes. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-39 j. Non-Point Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .V-39 2. Inventories and Descriptions . . . . . . . V-41 a. Municipal and Industrial Discharges. . . . . . . . . . . . V-41 b. Thermal Discharges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-65 3. Municipal Needs and Priorities . ................ V-68 a. Needs Survey. ........................ V-68 b. Construction Grants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... V-68 4. Abatement Requirements and Compliance Schedules . . . . . . . . V-77 5. Interstate Waters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. V-77 Page VI. Classifications and Standards of Water Quality 1. Existing Classifications and Standards . . . . . .. . . .... VI-1 2. Revisions to Standards and Classifications. . . .. .. . *.. VI-9 3. Special Designations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-10 a. Anti-degradation Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-lo b. Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers. . . . . . . . . . . . VI-lI c. Coastal Zone. ... ... . . . . . . . . * * * * * * * * VI-12 VII. Segment Analyses-Water Quality Assessments 1. Water Quality Limiting Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1 2. Closed Shellfishing Waters. . . . . . . . . . . VII-6 3. Closed Bathing Beaches. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-10 4. Water Quality Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-14 a. Raritan Bay .. . . . . VII-14 b. Arthur Kill-Kill Van Kull . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . VII-15 c. New York Harbor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-16 d. East River-Harlem River ....... . . . VII-18 e. Long Island Sound ..................... VII-90 f. Byram River-Port Chester Harbor . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-23 g. Blind Brook-Milton Harbor . . . . . VII-24 h. Mamaroneck Harbor-Mamaroneck River (Sheldrake River)- Guion Creek (Beaver Swamp Brook). . . . . . . . . . .. VII-25 i. Larchmont Harbor-East Creek. . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-27 j. Echo Bay-Premium Mill Pond. . . . . . . . . . . .... VII-27 k. New Rochelle Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-28 1. Lower Harbor-Burling Brook. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-28 m. Hutchinson River-Bronx River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-28 n. Little Neck Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VII-29 o. Manhasset Bay.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-31 p. Hempstead Harbor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... VII-32 q. Oyster Bay Complex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-34 r. Northport Bay Complex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-35 s. Smithtown Bay . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-36 t. Port Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-38 u. PecQnic Bay-Block Island Sound. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-40 v. Peconic River ...................... . VII-41 w. Sag Harbor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . VII-42 x. Mecox Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. VII-43 y. Moriches Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VII-44 z. Shinnecock Bay. ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-45 aa. Great South Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VII-46 ab. South Oyster Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-49 ac. East Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-51 ad. Middle Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-540 ae. Hempstead Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-55 af. Jamaica Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-57 iv Page VIII. Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-1 . 9 1. Physiography . . . .... . . . . . ............. VIII-4 2. Geology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . VIII-4 3. Groundwater Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-6 4. Groundwater Use . . . . . . . . . ... VIII-9 5. Groundwater Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-15 6. Effects of Urbanization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-16 7. Recharge Basins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-19 8. Groundwater Quality. . . . . . . . . . . * . VIII-19 9. Long Island Groundwater Management . . . . . . . . . . . .. VIII-23 10. Groundwater Classifications and Standards . . . . . . . . . VIII-26 11. Groundwater Monitoring Programs Quality. . . . . . .... VIII-27 12. United States Geological Survey Groundwater Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-28 *0 13. Groundwater Legislation and Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-29 Glossary Appendices S~~~~~~~v FIGURES Figure Page 1. Atlantic Ocean-Long Island Sound, Planning Area (17). . . . . . . . II-2 2. 208 Areawide Waste Management Planning Areas. . . . . . . . . . . 11-60 3. Stream Gaging Stations . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ......... III-2 4. Tidal Current Charts--New York Harbor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11I-4 to III-4 5. Tidal Current Charts--Long Island Sound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-10 to III-15 6. Weather Station Locations . . . .X. . . .. . III-18 7. Sampling Stations--West ..................... ... ... IV-4 8. Sampling Stations--Central. ......... . . . . . . . . . . IV-5 9. Sampling Stations--East . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... IV-6 10. Waste Discharges--New York, Westchester . . . . . . . . .. V-3 11. Waste Discharges--Nassau, Western Suffolk... . . . . . . . . . V-4 12. Waste Discharges--Eastern Suffolk . . . . . ...... . . . . . . V-5 13. Dredge Spoil Dumping Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . V-25 14. New York Bight Dumping Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-26 15. Pumpout Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . V-36 16. Projects Pending Grants for Construction .............. V-72 17. Projects Pending Grants for Facility Planning and Design . . .... V-74 18. Existing and Proposed Storm Water Treatment Plants . . . . . . . . V-75 19. Assigned N.Y.S. Classifications for Marine Waters-- New York, Westchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-5 20. Assigned N.Y.S. Classifications for Marine Waters-- Nassau, Western Suffolk. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. VI-6 21. Assigned N.Y.S. Classifications for Marine Waters-- Eastern Suffolk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VI-7 22. Interstate Sanitation Commission Classifications. . . . . . . . . . . VI-8 23. Water Quality Limited Segments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-3 vi Page 24. Closed Shellfishing Areas--New York, Westchester . . . . . . . . . VII-7 25. Closed Shellfishing Areas--Nassau, Western Suffolk. . . . . . . . . VII-8 26. Closed Shellfishing Areas--Eastern Suffolk. . . . . . . . . . . . VII-9 27. Closed Swimming Areas--New York, Westchester. . . . . . . . . . . . VII-11 28. Closed Swimming Areas--Nassau, Western Suffolk . . . . . . . . . . VII-12 29. Closed Swimming Areas--Eastern Suffolk. . a . .. . . . . . . . . VII-13 30. Natural Hydrologic Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-2 31. Water Budget Area ....................... . VIII-3 32. Geologic Cross Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-7 33. Comparison of Ground Water Withdrawals. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . VIII-10 34. Graphs of Average Daily Withdrawals.... . . . . . . . . . . .. VIII-11 35. Water Table Contours--Natural, 1936, 1961, 1974 . . . . . . . . .. VIII-14 36. Hydrologic Cycle as Influenced by Man . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-17 vii TABLES Table Page 1. Historical and Projected Population .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-4 2. Labor Force and Employment . . . . . . . . . II-18 3. Non-Agricultural Employment, New York City 1960, 1970-1974 ......................... . II-19 4. Historical and Recent Migration Rates-New York City ........ . . . . II-20 5. Historical and Projected Population-New York City . . . . . II-21 6. Non-Agricultural Employment--Nassau-Suffolk ............ . .... II-22 7. Non-Agricultural Employment--New York State ........... . 11-23 8. NSRPB Population Project ions--Nassau-Suffolk . . . . . . .II-24 9. Non-Agricultural Employment--Westchester . . . .....11II-25 10. Historical and Projected Population --Westchester . . . . . .II-26 11. Land U s e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. . 11-27 12. 208 Areawide Waste Management Studies I. . . . . . . . . 11-37 13. Stream Gaging Stations. .................... . . . III-3 14. Climatological Data . . . . . . . . ................. 11I-19 15. Major Routine Sampling Programs ........................ IV-3 16. Locations of Chemical Sampling Stations-New York Area. ........ IV-7 to IV-9 17. Waste Sources and Abatement Status. ................. . V-6 to V-15 18. Effluent Limits for Municipal Discharges to Effluent Limited Waters . . . .. * * ..... . . ... V-16 19. Combined Sewer Overflows...................... V-20 20. Sewage Pumpout Facilities * . . .............. V-37 21. Summary of 1974 Survey of Needs . . . . ............. * .. V-69 22. Projects Pending Construction Grants... . ........ V-71 23. Projects Pending Grants for Planning, Design and Construction. . .. . . . ................... V-73 24. NPDES/SPDES Permit Effluent Restrictions. .. . . .. V-79 to V-83 viii Page 25. Classifications and Standards for Fresh Surface Waters.. . . . . . . . O. . . . . . . . ........ VI-2 26. Classifications and Standards for Marine Waters . . . . . . . . . . . VI-3 27. Classifications and Standards for Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . VI-4 28. Water Quality Limited Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-4, 5 29. Water Budget.. . . . . . . . . .. . * VIII-3 30. Pumpage Rates 1950, 1966 and 1973. . . . . . . . ... . VIII-12, 13 ix SUNMARY I. Water Quality Problems Water quality problems are widespread in the Atlantic Ocean- Long Island Sound Basin. - Over 100,000 acres of shellfishing waters are currently closed due to bacterial contamination. This includes scattered areas in Suffolk County, nearly all bays and Long Island Sound waters of Nassau and Westchester Counties, and New York City waters off Rockaway and in a portion of Raritan Bay. - About 50 bathing beaches are normally closed or posted each summer because of bacterial pollution. Most closures are temporary, but chronic pollution exists at several New York City beaches and at a few beaches in Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester Counties. - Weed growth and algal blooms are of nuisance proportion in portions of Western Long Island Sound and adjoining bays, Huntington Harbor, the lower Peconic River, Moriches Bay, South Oyster Bay, Hempstead Bay and Jamaica Bay. - Oil slicks, turbidity, drift and sludge accumulations from combined sewer overflows or raw discharges create serious water quality problems in the poorly flushed backwater areas in the Upper New York Bay. Sludges decomposing cause foul odors in many areas. * ~~~~~~~~~~~S- 1 - portions of the Byram River, Arthur Kill, Harlem and Lower East Rivers approach anoxic conditions at critical9 periods during the summer. Water temperatures on the Arthur Kill reach 85OF thus increasing biological activity and decreasing the solubility of oxygen in water. Shellfish culture and a satisfactory fishery cannot be maintained in these waters. - Many ground water supplies on Long Island are contaminated with nitrates, detergents, chlorides and toxic materials. This problem is of serious consequence since the islanders depend solely on a limited ground water resource for their domestic water supply. 2. Sources of Pollution Water problems cited above are due to a wide variety and multiplicity of sources.9 More than 500 waste discharges have been identified in the Basin. Fifteen percent of these discharges are large municipal discharges, five percent are major industrial discharges and the remaining smaller point sources many of which discharge to the ground water supplies of Suffolk County. Table A provides information on each major source. Figures A, B and C show each discharge location. Other significant sources include combined sewer discharges in New York City and Westchester County, thousands of individual household systems, mostly in Suffolk County, duck farm waste, landfill leachate, vessel waste discharges, thermal discharges, ocean dumping of spoil and sludges and dredging activities. S-2 3. 208 Planning Areawide waste treatment management (208) planning is actively under way in the Long Island-Atlantic Ocean Basin. About 14.4 million dollars have been granted by EPA for 208 planning; 5.2 million dollars for Nassau and Suffolk Counties; 8.1 million dollars for New York City and 1.1 million dollars for Westchester County. These plans are scheduled for completion in early 1978. 4. Sewerage Facility Needs The cost of corrective facilities in the planning area based on DEC's 1974 "Needs Survey" is 14.2 billion dollars. About 3.3 billion dollars are needed for sewage treatment and transmission facilities; 3.1 billion for new collectors; 2.1 billion for sewer system rehabilitation; and 5.7 billion for correction of combined sewers and stormwater control. Table B summarizes these -needs by municipality. These estimates are currently being revised. 0 ~~~Thirty-four projects or phases of projects with an estimated project cost of 2.3 billion dollars are pending construction grants. See Table C. These projects comprise 47 percent of the statewide estimated costs of projects pending construction grants. Twenty additional projects with project costs of $134,160,000 are pending grants for planning and design. See Table D. Short range plans in New York City are for intercepti on and treatment of dry weather flows and separate sanitary sewers on Staten Island. This will cost 2.5 billion dollars. Over 300 combined sewer overflows and storm runoff will remain untreated. New York City, through the 208 program, is developing a water quality model to evaluate the impact of these discharges an water quality * ~~and water quality improvements that could be accomplished through alternative control schemes. 9-3 Currently 5 million cubic yards per year of sewage sludges from metropolitan New York City and New Jersey sewage treatment plants are barged and dumped in a designated site in the New York Bight Apex. This volume is expected to double with increased wastewater treatment during the next 20 years. The Interstate Sanitation Commission has taken the lead in investigations of alternative methods of disposal with the goal of eliminating ocean disposal. Needs for advanced waste treatment to prevent ground water contamination and nuisance weed growths and algae blooms in the Long Island embayments are being evaluated through ongoing 201 wastewater facility planning. Twenty-one advanced waste treatment plants are already on line. Most of these are small plants located in Suffolk County and provide nitrogen removal, effluent polishing and ground water recharge. Fifteen additional plants, including Glen Cove, Sag Harbor and Bay Park are in the planning and design stage. The 208 studies currently underway are identifying costs and evaluating the effectiveness of non-point source control and/or advanced point source treatment alternatives in each water quality limiting segment. The results of these studies are expected to provide a basis for policies and plans to manage the quality and quantity of ground water resources and protect the environmental integrity of bays and surface waters throughout the Atlantic Ocean- Long Island Sound planning area. s-4 5. Water Quality Limiting Segments Based on limited water quality modeling and sampling, the following areas are presently classified as "water quality limited segments": 1. Arthur Kill-Kill Van Kull 2. Upper New York Bay 3. East River-Harlem River 4. Western Long Island Sound 5. Byram River-Port Chester Harbor 6. Manhasset Bay 7. Hempstead Harbor 8. Huntington Harbor 9. Port Jefferson 10. Peconic River 11. Sag Harbor 12. Moriches Bay 13. Great South Bay 14. Middle Bay 15. Hempstead Bay 16. Long Island Groundwaters Water quality surveys and modeling of alternative waste load allocations are being carried out by designated 208 agencies. These studies will confirm these classifications or provide justification for reclassification of segments. S-5 6. Permits For Water Quality Control Permits to control the discharge of point sources of pollution have been issued under the State/National Discharge Elimination System for nearly 90%. of the discharges. Table E summarizes the biochemical oxygen demand limitation for each major discharge. Further information on treatment requirements, abatement conditions and schedules can be found in the discharge permits. These are on file and available for inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Offices. NPDES/SPDES permits are also required at oil storage and transfer sites. These permits require the collection of runoff and removal of oil and grease that runoff might contain. Bulk users and handlers of oil must also have plans for spill prevention and control. The U.S. Coast Guard has responsibility for vessel transfers of oil. Any spills must be reported to the Coast Guard day or night. The discharger has primary responsibility for emergency containment and cleanup. The Corps of Engineers is responsible for updating proper disposal of dredged spoil under Section 404 of PL 92-500. Because of the potential adverse environmental impact of ocean disposal of dredged spoil, the Corps has recently reduced the number of acceptable disposal sites to five in Long Island Sound and to the New York Bight. Studies of these sites are underway to better determine the ways and extent of dumping on the environment. The discharge of wastes from vessels are not controlled by NPDES/SPDES permits but are controlled by State and Federal laws and regulations. The Environmental Protection Agency currently controls sewage discharges from vessels by requiring the use of macerator-chlorinators.* S-6 New York State prohibits the discharge of sewage that has not received a secondary level of treatment. To meet these requirements most small vessels have installed sewage holding tanks which are emptied periodically at some 61 pumipout and land based treatment facilities in the planning area. Seven of these are in Connecticut. This is considered to be an adequate number although additional facilities especially in the New York City Area, are needed for convenience and to discourage illegal discharges. S-7 LEGEND MUNICIPAL. INSTITUTIONAL METAL FINISHING AND OTHER INDUSTRIES I. NASSAU SMELTING AND REFINING 2. SUCREST 3. BUSH TERMINAL 4. AMSTAR 4% 5. INTERBORO SURFACE 6. PHELPS DODGE 2*~ 7. PEARL WICK POWER PLANTS POTIETE T a. LILCO - FAR ROCKAWAY WESTCHSTIER b. CON ED.- ARTHUR KILL c.CON ED.- HUDSON AVE /I 1. CON ED - EAST RIVER LIND BR. STP e. CON ED -WATER SIDE / I I. CON ED - RAVE NSWOOD M M R N C T S. CON ED.- 74TH ST h. CON ED.- ASTORIANEROHLES OUTFALL HUNTS POINCDARURT V.STP -MAINON S INST SYPP I/~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WE RYI BAY T -- -- WA~CR.ST EE NASCSARGE -- -~~~Rl PROPNNTING C.AUX. (17) Tow~~ S-8 FigurePA WESTCHE ER PORT JEFFERSTINGON STP LO~~NORHPR ISLEANDS(N AST-PIL-1 B A Y ~ ~~HOSITAL STP ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PORT EERO ST WESTCHES~~~ ER ASSAU ST SCo.ale O.T 0 OE LNTU SAVEGRDSPSAU PITS SD No.2 &_L2AfL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Fgue ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BLOCKG- L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IT VERHEAD~ ~ ~ ~~~0'-tIt FARMS WIT WAT WAE taueM 0 ~~ 0 Table A Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built - -#/dav- MCD Reuirement *** MAJOR MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES *** ('Tote: Nm-lr Thermal Discharges at end of table) I. New York Bays - Arthur Kill - Kill Van Kull Nassau Smelting and --- Mill Creek, I -Chemical addition 1973 ------- Metals 0.331 -Sanitary waste to Refining and precipitation (Actual) Oakwood Beach STP to remove metals upon completion of and adjust pH interceptor -Cooling Tower -Meet BPT with existing treatment process NYC-Port Richmond, 346 Kill Van Kull, II Primary 1953, BOD , 24 BODu - 150,000 10 -Under construction to WPCP 593 1964 (Actual) NOD - 90,000 (Design) upgrade to 60 MGD Under BOD , 85 (New Design) 17.1 step aeration STP Con- (Proposed) (Actual) -Expand collection struc- 60 system tion (New -Convert to separate Design) sewers Sucrest Corporation --- Erie Basin, I None ------- BODu - 2500 9.65 (Actual -Process waste to Primary Red Hook STP in Cooling) future or provide BPT -Continue barometric condenser cooling water discharge Bush Terminal --- Gowanus Bay, I None ----- BODu - 7,000 0.995 -Inventory of tenants Associates (Actual needed to establish San., combined BPT limits Proc. & -Provide treatment or Cooling) join Owls Head System NYC-Owls Head, WPCP 402 Upper New York Bay, Modified Aeration 1952 BOD -. 55 BODu ' 225,000 160 -Achieving only 357 I (Actual) NOD - 135,000 (Design) 55% removals BOD - 85 (New Design) 99 -Facilities planning (Proposed) (Actual) underway. 135 -Probably provide (Proposed 135 NMD Activated Design) Sludge STP using pure oxygen -Abate combined sewer overflows -Achieving only 58% NYC-Oakwood Beach, 392 Lower New York Bay, Modified Aeration 1956, BOD.- 58 BODu - 68,000 16 -Achieving only 58 WPCP SB Under (Actual) NOD - 40,000 (Design) removals Con- BOD-- 85 (New Design) 19.1 upgrade to 40 tiD step struc- (Proposed) (Actual) aeration STP (Nesi) 4-Expand collection (New system Design) -Project priorities;12 & 13 Table A (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Strem Tratment ear E. Loading Stream Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -%- -CD Requirement Waste S2_Urce -70 MCD step aeration II. East River-Harlem River -5% co nstruction C-Re~d Hook, WPCP 394 East River, SD -None; Raw Under BOD,'- 85 BODu - 175,000 70 -Abate wet weather combined (NPYo-Red Hook, WPOP 394 East RiverSDand Combined Sewer Con- (proposed) NOD - 105.000 (Design) sewer overflows (Proposed) Discharges atruc- -To include flows from Newtown -Step aeration tion Creek under Construction -Project Priorities #37,38,39 & 40 BODu - 2,100 9.27 -Sanitary waste is Amstar Corp. --- East River, SD -Sanitary waste to --- (Actual) conveyed to municipal Amstar Corp. municipal system system I -Barometric condenser -eet T for othe r discharges wastes NYC-Newtown Creek 786 East River, SD 310 FMD Activated 1967, BOD.60 BOD - 850,000 310 -Manhattan pumping station N NWtC o Cre13 8EatRerSDSludge 1975 NOD - 500,000 (Design) tied in 5/76 Includes 20 MCD UNOX (Actual) -The plant is limited in includes 20 t onD UNOX 340 size by land availability Demonstration Project (Actual) & presently overloaded -Engineering studies are proposed to evaluate pure oxygen, inflow infiltration problems, diversion to other collection systems & sub- divisions of district as means of reducing flows or increasing plant capabilities -Diverted flow is being incorporated into Red took design Interboro Surface --- Newtown Creek, II -Dust Scrubber .... --------- TSS - 1500 .020 -Meet BPT, especially Sedimentation (Actual) suspended solids Pit Overflow reduction Phelps-Dodge Ref. 713 Newtown Creek, II -Sanitary : Raw ......" Metala and .565 -Sanitary wastes will Corph -Process: Neutral- Cooling Water (Actual) be conveyed to ization and municipal system Precipitation -Meet BPT for metals, -Cooling Water: pH, temperature, etc. Cooling Towers Pearl Wick, Corp. --- East River, SD None ---- --------- Metals and .041 -Sanitary wastes will Cooling Water (Actual) be conveyed to municipal system -Meet BPT for metals, temperature, etc. NYC-Wards Island, 214 East River, SD 1937,. BOD --60 BODu - 440,000 210 250 MCD step aeration WPCP 363 1948, (Actual) NOD - 260,000 (Design) under construction 395 Under BOD - 85 (New Design) 150 -Abate combined Con- (Proposed) (Treated) sewer overflows struc- 115 tion (Bypassed) (New Design) Table A (contid) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design * Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -%- -/dav- Reqgirement NYC-Bowery Bay, WPCP 398 Rikers I. Channel, Activated Sludge 1939, BOD -- 63 BOOu - 380,000 120 -150 MCD step aeration 406 SD 1958, (Actual) NOD - 220,000 (Design) under construction Under LOD - 85 (New Design) 113 -Abate combined Con- (Proposed) (Actual) sewer overflows struc- 150 tion (New Design) Hunts Point, WPCP 143 East River, I Step Aeration 1952, BOD -. 85 BODu = 335,000 150 -Being upgraded and 397 1964, (Proposed) NOD - 200,000 (Design) expanded to 200 MCD 399 Under (New Design) 151 step aeration STP Con- (Actual) -Harts Island; City struc- 200 Island and Orchard tion (New Design) Beach STPs have been abandoped with flow now to Hunts Point STP -Abate combined sewer overflows OO Tallmans Island, WPCP 166 East River, I Activated Sludge 1939, BOD -'80 BODu - 133,000 60 -Only prir:ary removal 404 1965, (Actual) NOD - 80,000 (Design) while under construc- F-H Under BOD. - 85 (New Design) 61 Lion Con- (Proposed) (Actual) -80 MGD modified struc- 80 aeration by June 1976 tion (New -80MGCD step aeration Design) by January 1977 -Abate combined sewer overflows IIi, Western Long Island Sound Port Chester 069 Byram River, SC Primary 1964 BOD ,-18 BODu = 16,000 6.0 vated sludge STP 695 (Actual) NOD - 9,300 (Design) -Effluent to discharge to BODp..-85 (Existing) 6.2 proposed Blind Brook out- (Proposed) (Actual) fall -Provide sludge disposal service to Blind Brook -Project priorities i173 and #174 Blind Brook 105 Long Island Sound, -Primary 1963 BOD ' 19 BODU - 8,300 5.0 -Upgrade to 5 MGD activated 696 SB -Outfall to Sound (Actual) NOD = 5,000 (Design) sludge STP 9D- S~ (Eiting 2.9 -Install new outfall to B(Proposed) 85(Actual) serve Blind Brook & Port (Proposed) (Actu al) ter -Pump sludge to Port Chester -Project priorities :145& 4 14b Mamaroneck 908 Long Island Sound, -Primary 1965 BOD-- 28 BODu 31,000 18 -Existing plant designed to SB -2.5 Mile Outfall (Actual) NOD - 19,000 (Design) handle 60 MCD storm flows to Sound BOB - 85 (Existing) 18.5 -Upgrade to 18 MCD secondary (Proposed) (Actual) STP -Upgrade to 15 MGD pure New Rochelle 5 Long Island Sound, -Primary 1935, BOD 13 BOD 24000 15 P SB -1.7 Mile Outfall 1964 (Actual) NOD 14,000 (Design) -bate overflows to Sound BOD.-.85 (Existing 14.5 -Correct excessive (Proposed\ prs iin) (Actual) . . Table A (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Waters Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built - - -#/day- MGD Requirement III. Western Long Island Sound Belgrave S.D. 609 Little Neck Bay, SB High Rate 1935, BOD N- 80 BODU - 5000 2.0 Meet BPT requirements Trickling Filter 1965 NOD - 3000 Great Neck Vg. 341 Manhasset Bay, SB High Rate 1933, BOD - 85 BODu - 3750 1.5 Meet BPT requirements Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 2250 (Design) 1.0 (Actual) Great Neck S.D. 629 Hanhasset Bay, SB High Rate 1962, BOD ,- 85 BODu - 6740 2.7 Overloaded; expand Trickling Filter 1967 NOD i 4040 (Design) facilities in future 2.9 and extend service to (Actual) adjacent area Port Washington 351, Manhasset Say, SB High Rate 1951, BOD B- 75 BODu - 7500 3.0 -Unranked pending 666 Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 4500 project; 201 planning needed -Plant overloaded -Extend services to Vg. of Roslyn and adjacent area -Expand capacity to 6.5 MGD -Install outfall to Sound Roslyn Vg. 342 Hempstead Harbor, High Rate 1942, BOD_ 80 BODu - 1250 0.5 - Meet BPT requirements SB Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 750 - Abandon plant and join with Port Washington in regional system in future Glen Cove (C) 236, Glen Cove Creek-I High Rate 1919, BOD - 80 BODu - 10,000 4.0 -Expand to 8 MGD acti- 665 Hempstead Harbor, Trickling Filter 1964 NOD - 6,000 (Design) vated sludge STP with S5.23 discharge to the tidal (Actual) mouth of Glen Cove Creek -Extend service to Sea Cliff, Roslyn Harbor, Brookville-Old Westbury Area in future -Project priorities 52 & 53 Oyster Bay --- Oyster Bay Harbor, High Rate 1963 BOD ' 85 BODU - 3000 1.2 -Plant periodically SA Trickling Filter NOD - 1800 flooded at high tide -System receives excessive inf ion/ inflow Table A (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Waters Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -7.- -#/day- MGD Requirement IV, Central & Eastern Lone Island Sound Huntington SD, STP 343 Huntington Harbor, High Rate 1927, BOD " 85 BODu - 5000 2.0 - Sewer system SA Trickling Filter 1956, NOD -- 0 NOD - 3000 receives considerable 1970 infiltration Northport STP 237 Northport Harbor, Extended Aeration 1973 BOD - 85 BODu - 825 0.5 - Serves Centerport SA NOD 50 NOD - 495 S.D. - Abated - r1ant expansion and sewer services to surrounding area being studied Northport Veterans --- Subsurface Discharge Trickling Filter -- BOD.- 85 BODu - 775 0.31 ----------- Itn~~ ~ Hospital Sand Filtration NOD - 465 In Stony Brook --- Subsurface Discharge Rated Aeration 1965 BOD 85 BODu - 900 0.36 - UDorade Subdivision 1975 NOD - 540 -Planning area has Kings Park SD 46 --- ang Island Sound, Activated Sludge 1935, BOD 85 BSODu - 2500 2.0 been defined SA 1963 NOD - 50 NOD - 1500 -Capacity available for expansion Port Jefferson STP 709 Port Jefferson Primary,Chlorination 1957, BOD --35 BODu - 3680 2.27 - Existing system has SD P1 Harbor, SC 1962 NOD - 2210 (Design) considerable 1973 infiltration - 201 and 208 studies are underway. Completion of 201 study scheduled for 6/77 - Serves SUNY at Stony Brook and Lace Mill Greenport Vs. 621 Long Island Sound, Primary, Imhoff 1940 BOD_ 33 BODu - 1251 0.5 - Plant being upgraded SA Tank NOD - 0 NOD - 750 Actual to 0.5 HGD STP (0.3) consisting of 2 aerated lagoons for extended biological oxidation - Under construction - Project priority 069 V. Peconic River - Peconic Bay Area Brookhaven National --- Trib. to Peconic Primary Clarifier, Unknown N.A. N.A. 1.3 Low level radioactive Laboratory River Sand filters wastes and sanitary waste are within acceptable limits Table A (conted) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. , Loadin g Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -%- -#/day- MGD Requirement Duck Farms (5 Farms) --- Peconic River Aerated Lagoons 1965- ROD.- 85 H.A. N.A. Duck Farms to 1970 improve operation and convert to dry farming by 1983 Riverhead, New York 536 Peconic River - High Rate 1937, BOD- 85 BODu - 3000 1.2 -Abated Peconic Bay, SC Trickling Filter 1971 NOD - 1800 Actual -201 underway -0.6 Shelter Island Heights --- Daring Bay, SA Septic Tank, 1925 BOD ,35 BOD - 100 Association Outfall Sewer NOD - 60 0.04 Provide secondary treatment Bulova Watch Company, --- Sag Harbor Bay, SA None ---- ---------- Metals, 0.1 - Segregate cooling, Toxic sanitary and Substances process waste. Submit engineering report. - Sanitary waste to Sag Harbor STP {M~~ ~ Sag Harbor Vg. 433 Sag Harbor Bay, SA NHone, 2 Sewer Proposed ----------- BODu - 250 0.1 - New, extended I~~-'~~ ~(Proposed) Outfalls and (Proposed) (Proposed) aeration plant Individual Sub- NOD " 150 under construction surface systems (Proposed) to provide 90% over- all removal - Outfall to be located outside breakwater - Future expansion to 0.5 MGD planned .............. - Project priorities VI. Hontauk Point - Atlantic Ocean A46 & 47 U.S. Air Force --- Atlantic Ocean, SA High Rate 1973 BOD-- 85 BODU - 118 0.049 -Abated (Montauk) Trickling Filter NOD - 70 VII. Moriches Bay - Atlantic Ocean Duck Farms (17 Farms) --- Tributaries to Aerated Lagoons 1965- BOD - 85 N.A, N.A. -Duck farms to Moriches Bay 1970 improve operation and convert to dry farming by 1983 VIII. Creat South Bay - Atlantic Ocean Duck Farms (2 Farms) --- Tributaries to Aerated Lagoons 1965- BOD - 85 N.A. N.A. -Duck farms to Great South Bay 1970 improve operation and convert to dry farming by 1983 Patchogue, Vg. 741 Patchogue Cr., D Primary Settling 1927, BOD '-35 BOOu - 1250 0.5 Upgrade level o treat- 1951 NOD - 750 ment, expand service -Participate in regional 208 Study, Suffolk Co. South Central Study Area -Planning area has been defined Table A (conted) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Fa'lities Built -- -#/day- MCD Requirement Ocean Beach STP --- Great South Bay, Primary 1917, BOD 35 BODu = 1251 0.05 -Seasonal flows limited SA Chlorination 1950 NOD - 750 .- Limited room for expansion -Provide secondary treatment -Under construction -Project prior'ity #55 Yaphank Regional 994 ---------- Proposed Proposed --------- ---------- Undefined -208 study is underway S.D. (Proposed) -completion date for the study is 1/77 -Regional system, STP Cn sites & design capacities are undefined -Planning area has been. defined South Central Study --- ---------- Proposed Proposed --------- ---------- Undefined -Reginnal projects to Area Disposal be defined in 201 & 208 District #2 studies -Planning area has been defined IX. South Ovster Bav - Atlantic Ocean Suffolk Co. Southwest 624 Atlantic Ocean, Activated Under BOD 85 BODu = 75,000 30 -Regional STP & inter- S.D. #3 SA* Sludge Con- NOD - 45,000 ceptors under struc- construction. Completion tion scheduled for January 1978 -Finalize plans for ocean outfall -Complete environmental restoration along route of outfall -Includes substantial amount of industrial waste -Project priorities #140, 141, 142, 143 & 144 West Central S.D. 995 --------- Proposed Proposed -------- ---------- Undefined -208 study is underway (Proposed) -Regional system, STP sites & design capacities are undefined -Planning area has been defined Table A (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -1%- -#/davy- MGD Requirement XI. Jamaica Bay (cont'd) NYC-Rockaway, WPCP 68 Jamaica Bay, SB Modified Aeration 1952, BOD J-' 20 BODu - 75,000 30 -Being expanded and 403 1961, (Actual) NOD - 45,000 (Design) upgraded to 45 MGD Under BOD-' /85 19.3 step aeration STP Con- (Proposed) (Actual) -Abate combined struc- 45 sewer overflows tion (New Design) Maimonides -.- Jamaica Bay, SB -Activated Sludge BOD,85 BODu - 15 .0060 -Buildings not currentl1 -Also raw discharges NOD ' 9 (Design) connected to treat- (Design) .0017 ment facility shall be CDO (Actual) connected I k-" NYC-Jamaica, WPCP 109, Jamaica Bay, SB Step Aeration 1943, BOD -70 BODu - 170,000 100 -Being upgraded 321, 1964, (Actual) NOD = 100,000 (Design) step aeration 400 Under BOD '- 93 93 -Abate combined Con- (Proposed) (Actual) sewer overflows struc- tion Spring Creek 347 Old Hill Creek, I -Temporary storage 1972 --------- --------- 1,300,000 -Continue operation Auxiliary STP of combined sewage of and monitoring of -Primary settling and storage operation chlorination of excess -Use results of combined sewage observations -Retained sewage treated as basis for designs at 26th Ward WPCP in of other combined dry weather sewer overflow corrective measures 26th Ward, WPCP 405 Hendrix Creek, I Step Aeration 1944 BOD "-85 BODu - 140,000 60 -Being expanded and 1951 (Proposed) NOD - 85,000 (Design) upgraded to 85 MGD Under (New Design) 66 step aeration STP Con- (Actual) -Continue treatment struc- 85 of stored combined tion (New sewage from Spring Design) Creek Auxiliary STP -Abate remaining combined sewer overflows NYC-Coney Island, 396 Rockaway Inlet, SB 1Mdified Aeration 1936 BOD -.' 55 BOD, - 183,000 110 -Upgrade to step WPCP 345 1963 (Actual) NOD - 110,000 (Design) aeration STP 044 DOD n 85 100 (Proposed) (Actual) ^ ' ^ ' S Table A �(cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Ialand-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year 'Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Sources Number & Classification Facilities Built -- -/dav- MCD Requirement X. East Bav-Middle Bav-Hempstead Bav-Atlantic Ocean Nassau Co. SD #3 - 361, Atlantic Ocean, Activated Sludge 1974 BODO-� 85 BODu - 112,700 45 -Project 982 to Cedar Creek- , 628, SA NOD - 67,500 include 5.0 MGD pilot 982 advanced wastewater treatment-recharge facility -Plant to be expanded to 90 MGD in 1981 to include Freeport and other areas -t.Ae] C7g179 & I .O Jones Beach State --- Sloop Channel, Trickling Filter ---- BODY- 85 BODu - 6,250 25 - Meet BPT Park STP SA NOD - 3,750 (Design) requirements 0.225 (Actual Summer Flow) Freeport V. STP --- Stadium Park High Rate 1927, BODY 85 BODu - 10,000 4.0 -Connect to Canal, SC (Trib. of Trickling Filter 1961 NOD - 6,000 (Design) Nassau SD #3 Freeport Cr. And 3.7 -Receives some In Hreeport Cr. And (Actual) industrial lHempstead Bay), I plating waste LO -Some infiltration inflow problems Nassau Co. S.D. 42 891 Reynolds Channel, Activated Sludge 1951, BOD 90 BODu - 150,000 60 -Plant to be expanded Bay Park STP SB 1961 NOD - 90,000 (Design) to 90 MGD 65 -Install 3.0 mile (Actual) long ocean outfall to depth of 56 ft. -Receive waste from Cedarhurst and Lawrence in future Long Beach (C) 305 Reynolds Channel, High Rate 1952, BOD-. 85 BOoD - 16,000 6.4 -Discontinue dis- SB Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 9,600 (Design) charge to Reynolds 6.9 Channel (Actual) -Tie into proposed Bay Park ocean outfall West Long Beach STP --- Reynolds Channel, High Rate 1927, BOD .-85 BODU - 7,500 1.5 -Meet BPT SB Trickling Filter 1960 NOD - 4,500 (Design) requirements 0.65 (Actual) Lawrence STP --- Banister Creek, I High Rate 1933, BOO - 85 BODu - 3,750 1.5 - Pump to Bay Park (Trib. to Reynolds Trickling Filter 1966 NOD - 2,250 (Design) Channel) 0.76 XI. Jamaica Bay Cedrhurt otta Cr., I High Rate 1934, BOD 85 BD - 2,500 1.0 Pump to (ederhurst STP Trickling Filter 1968 NOD 1,500 Bay Park Inwood ST2 --- Jamaica Bay, High Rate 1963 BODBODuB - 6,250 2.5 -Meet BPT fas C.sSBTrickling Filter NoD - 3,760 (Design) requirements (Nassau Co. S.D,#0) So Bcln itr1.5 Table A (coantd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -%- -#/day- M 4D Requirement *** MAJOR THERMAL DISCHARGES *** CAPACITY -NW- Con-Ed - Arthur Kill ..---. Arthur Kill None - - - - - 911 654 (Actual) Con-Ed - Hudson Avenue --- East River None ---- --------- 700 967 (Actual) Con-Ed - East River --- East River None .----- 513 541 (Actual) CD t~ Con-Ed - Waterside --- East River None -- - -....... 596 55or (Actual) thermal discharges were approved Con-Ed - Ravenswood --- East River None - 1828 1390 March, 1975 (Actual) Con-Ed - 74th Street --- East River None -- -- --------- 209 317 (Actual) -Requirements for Con-Ed - Astoria --- East River None --- 1550 1363 tri-axial (Actual) temperature measurements Con-Ed - Astoria, Unit 6 East River None ---- 800 785 and other permit (Proposed) (Pronosed) requirements � ' ' '' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~are being LILCO - Glenwood Landing --- Hempstead Harbor None ............. 381 395 contested by � contested by (Actual) dischargere; adjudicatory LILCO - Northport -__ Long Island Sound None -- -- 1125 682 hearings 1125 682 ~~hearings (Actual) are to be held LILCO - Port Jefferson --- Port Jefferson Harbor None ---- --- 438 375 held (Actual) LILCO - Shoreham, Nuclear --- Long Island Sound None 820 863 (proposed) (Actual) LILCO - Far Rockaway --- Mott Basin None -- ----- 100 82 (Actual) LIICO - E. F. Barrett --- Barnums Island None ---- ----. . 380 294 Channel (Actual) Rvs12/75 Revised 9/76 TABLE B SUMMARY OF 1974 SURVEY OF NEEDS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES ($1,000 June 1973) CATEGORY NYC WESTCHESTER NASSAU SUFFOLK TOTAL I 0 68,853 56,747 89,817 215,417 II 1,143,553 2,057 347,096 531,160 2,023,866 IIIA 232,900 35,130 6,630 721 275,381 IIIB 1,795,998 3,168 24,582 0 1,823,748 IVA 1,330,321 7,084 649,026' 1,107,413 3,093,844 IVB 216,578 2,950 115,341 750,253 1,085,122 V 2,834,442 0 0 0 2,834,442 Sub total 7,553,792 119,242 1,199,422 2,479,364 11,351,820 VI 99,129 174,017 739,667 1,869,491 2,882,304 Total 7,652,921 293,259 1,939,089 4,348,855 14,234,124 CATEGORY I - Secondary Treatment (AWT not required) CATEGORY II - *Secondary Treatment and/or AWT CATEGORY IIIA - Infiltration/Inflow Correction including treatment CATEGORY IIIB - Replacement or Major Rehabilitation of sewers CATEGORY IVA - *New Collectors, etc. CATEGORY IVB - *New Interceptors, etc. CATEGORY V - Correction of combined sewer overflows CATEGORY VI - Treatment and/or control of storm waters *Categories currently eligible for federal funds under Public Law 92-500. S-21 \ *WESTCHESTER .- Z Armonk- . Genpr W B, -odB._,r lle OSd .-Port I o % N~~~~~~~~~~w R~eer H-ead NE\41 i/~/8ROmx] dJERFSEY y /r' .-ohrgtn %NASSAU QUEENS ) w JoncoBy k edar Cr. G Ocean Beach \Q~~tYN~~~IJ~~~i Say) Park 1/ST ATEN Iq , :: I *~~~~ ~~~~~~~~Ns 4, O Lan Beach ~~~~ ~~~~~~ad S0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~Projct/s Bekn Plonned Or iDeSiqred N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Figure D Mparida Li /0/29/76 TAB1LE C PROJECTS VENDING CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (RANKED STATIEWIDE) (5/76) 57811 APPLICAT17 E l Ct im-Atcd Rpi'2S 11EH7. I 1A' 011 EPA Est. v1�16lo PRIORITY 741t81T4 rflLCM'T SLE' MONGR7 numEB lq' $too' DAlE PROJECT RESC8IPTIO:I Assist'aace Fiajoct cost ra-,o , L7 -' cumto (t7Slo) kys - F-JO-3H6 e (yr. A xo.f (facility Need Scoipe) (SI .01ij (51,033) 10 81.25 He- Rochcflie ID iE637 567 3 12176 poo 498.15?S6 YPSIC~t strr (17) Col 12, 81.25 Oai-,,,d Beach 26114 392 if 10/16 I'o-t,4'sFII0 9, 1;tC (7) ItpsIl 13 81.25 Catnaid Beach 26174 3112 III 3/77 MO0-2 3e.,350 45,300 81.25 Do. 26174 392 IV .7/7 7 mo3-?,4.5 72,100 168 PS ,FR 51.25 D.26174 392 V6/71 M00-2 4 5 18,500. 14 51.25 DO. 26174 312 VI /7I F100-3 6,600 8,800 37 71.6 0r I'co 27073 394 it 5175 RIEsT-3 49,539.25 66,119 N(C (11) STP 38 1 1. P-3 D). 27073 394 III 6/76 Sf0.2 56,611.5 15,432 Inkt. 39 M11.1 Do. 27013 394 IV 8/16 NEW-S 8,212.5 10.950 43 7 1.831 Red Hook 20703 394 V 1177 681W-2 28,755.75 38,341 NYC (17) tnt. 71.83 00. 21073 391 VI 11EV-S 43,1 45 59.51 Sag Harbo~r (VI283 433 It 8/15 m30-1 81I 1os Suffolk (17) OS 4?' 69.57 Sag ~lirber (3) Z ell" 433 III 11/17 MCD-6 162 216 S-jfrik (17) Rehab. 52 m.7 G loen Cove (C) 25520 555 IA 10/76 670-8 4,050 5,400 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~llasoo~a (It) SWr 53 68.75 0a. 26620 545 it 3/17 Y00-3 501.5 810 Ss 56181 C c-a' njwh (Y) 783 3 12/75 RIC0- 3 101.2$ 135 S'iffeib (I)) Col. 61 69.25 Gror-port (9) 20079 62l 3 12176 P:09-3 8.25 1 Suffolk (171. Col. 140 62.60 S-iffolk Co. 50/3 1036 8 5/26 M O M 2 12,259.5 15,345 Suffolk (17) LIRT 141 62.50 Do. 1036 1 3/75 P30-3 21,855 29.140 Col. 142 62.50 aa. 1035 if 10/76 670-2 2,597.25 3,853 143 62.55 Re~~~~~~D. 1036 11 10/26 670.3 24.921 33.228 52.53 De. 101M lt 5/77 K IM3- 4,709 It:T 144 62.50 n o. 1036 fit 5/71 WID-3 42,559.5 .55,146 Col 1562.50 E l 1.r4 Iraak 25119 699 8 3/75 M Y 4 - 1,8 10,836.75 34,449 lVrotchcstor (171 STP,OS 146 62.50 Do . 26719 595 11 11175 POO3-3 1,656.5 2,222 Col. 173 50.25 Port CYestcr ()25761, 55 1 3/16 INr -4.8 l5,P911.5 22.722 Wcs ccester (87) 5TP,014 114 55.25 Do. 28186 615 IT 11716 K ID0 -3 45 to Cc. 173 55.25 Codi, Crc,.k V, CP 26859 9 11,2 1 4/76 N 01 " w 4,09 24.?01 33.016 Nassau (Il) S1I\l4.Reccha rgL 178 55.2 CEdar Cerok V;,rp 2,6 t5 9 Q 82 ti G/75 pF,,Q-3 32.640 43,520 Raisslu (17). Col. 179 55.25 Co. 16859) go, fit 12/16 P10-3 24,775.25 32,357 Co I 1.80 5~~~~~~~-~~~ Do. 20)39 99.2 18 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4'71 ~ - 26,5935 35.458 56.25 Do . 16859 '902 V 121177 fl3 128.640 CotI S5.75 Do . 26P.59 501, 01 171 60- 3 126183 Cal. 55.25 D. W59~t? 90 I 17/79 r.30 0.3 133,708 Col. mg ?l0I S-23 TA BLE D PROJECTS PENDING GRANTS FOR PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION (UNRANKED) (5/76) APPI~~~~~~~~~~~~~Eti- zcedt lrtkl* lotr A Est. eIlgible PeR!lt P91011 AkPtit.VIT W!'t FIR! 51181310 a urb-r 1.LJL. 361 PLOJEC I orsCall'Irwa tetiita"tp? Iwuecrt cost t9n.' S(C? CIJ'I W)T (005111 W.a C-In bose (Yr. 9.Fl. I (I-c ill PI,�r Sco c) (ii*tn)15 0C Suffolk (1)97 2 5/17 Icr. - r 317 106 Pt. JeIffcrs,)n S) 21520 6/11 uN iew 1,02- 1,350 Suffolk Cuo"'ty (111 lnt. SIP Venter.:.. tee (Ifl 3~~~~~~~~~~677 2.25' S 300 525 Corey Island 26162 356 18/16 tnt-a 1.038 1.384 KYC (17) SI.P-UP 114,394 162M 0lSPa 26166 402 1 9176 1311 ,4 NYC (7 .1751174 13.13tl'4.,-i Creek 113 1 i/l .202,6 NYC (11) .6 10.00 -Nassau Cr,. SD 12 265 9 11 1/6811.0 llass,.a (17 676BI 31.25 West Is- Beach 23523 'I043 1 10/7634 Hisssau (1;] SeOol1k Cs. 994 11/176.103l , swiuaCatl (171 97 1D8~~30 7 A~~~~~r~~~~~nk 50 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 117 40 Suffolk Co. 21159 709 1 11 3. P~lt .Thrfer,sj So Suffola. (17 28S]1 Xosta- ta1 fud 23523 117 Sludge. Disposal 1 Bowery Bay 26158 Ig; ldeDsoa 5 0 1136 (11) 92 l d e Dsoi Hnt'C Point 2610 Sludge Disposal 153) 200 NYC (l?) 26115 9177jy Sludge Disposal 150 0 Cocbenay ~~~~~~26221 1m Sludge Dispbsal 36 48 NYC (11) Tallra's Island 24231 1 9 17 Sludge Disposal 1201 0 port Ptl.-sng 26107 g i l l 1 Sludge Dlspusal 541 22 rird's island 261.11 19111 sludge Disposal 240 320 1.06 (12) 26th Card ~~~~~26212 19/17 7 Sludge Disposal -210 20 NYC (Ill. S-24 w~~~s~~c1 ~AlSTTER JjXBO 4G SL A~t N~~~~~~~ ASSAU QUA IT WUA1T EWET ATi LANTIC OCE17 SUN BAY.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 V~~~~~_ K TABLE E NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT WASTE SOURCE I lbs,/day - mg/1 REMOV. | TO EPIRATION DATE I. New York Bays - Arthur Kill - Kill Van Kull Nassau Smelting & _ January 31, 1974 - Refining January 31, 1979 NYC-Port Richmond 15,015 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 Sucrest Corp. 768 June 28, 1975'- June 28, 1979 (28,285) (Until July 1, 1977) Bush Terminal 236 Dec. 31, 1974-Dec. 31, Assoc. 1979 ( 4,695) (Until July 1, 1977) NYC-Owls Head 80,000 60 55% May 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 NYC-Oakwood Beach 10,000 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 II. East River - Harlem River NYC-Red Hook May 31, 1975 - (Proposed) June 30, 1977 Amstar Corp. 756 March 31, 1974 - March 31, 1979 NYC-Newtown Cr. 206,800 80 60% May 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 (111,200) (43) (8 0) (Prior to Manhattan. PS tie in October of 1975)- Interboro Surface DRAFT Phelps-Dodge Ref. 3.3 July 31, 1974 - July 31, 1979 S-26 Table E (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD ' EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERM' WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/l REMOV.1 TO EXPIRATION DATE II. East River - Harlem River (contd.) Pearl Wick Corp. September 30, 1974 - September 29, 1979 NYC-Wards Island 66,300 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 NYC-Bowery Bay 37,530 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 NYC-Hunts Point 50,000 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 NYC-Tallmans I. 20,000 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 III. Western Long Island Sound Port Chester *** ** ** August 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 Blind Brook *** ** ** October 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 Mamaroneck *** ** ** December 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 New Rochelle *** ** ** December 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 Belgrave 500 30 85% June 28, 1974 - June 28, 1979 Great Neck (V) 375 30 85% December 31, 1974;- December 31, 1979 (500) (40) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) S-27 Table E (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD I.~~ I.~~~ ~EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMI1 WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/l REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE III. Western Long Island Sound (contd.) Great Neck SD 35 807% January 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 Port Washington 30 85% November 30, 1974 - November 30, 1979 (35) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) Roslyn (V) 130 30 85% October 31, 1974 - October 30, 1979 (130) (30) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) Glen Cove 100 65% December 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 a Oyster Bay 313 30 85% March 29, 1974- March 29, 1979 ( ) (30) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) IV. Central and Eastern Long Island Sound Huntington S.D. 500 30 85% February 28, 1975 - February 28, 1980 Northport 75 30 85% February 28, 1974 - February 28, 1979 Kings Park State 250 30 85% March 29, 1974 - Hospital March 29, 1979 Port Jefferson *** ** ** March 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 Greenport *** ** June 30, 1974 - June 30, 1977 S-28 Table E (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS | 5 DAY BOD EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERhIT WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/, REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE V. Peconic River-Peconic Bay Area Brookhaven Nat'l. 575 30 85% January 31, 1975 - Laboratory January 31, 1980 H. F. Corwin & Sons 326 January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 (1,400) (Until July 1, 1977) Riverhead 300 30 85% March 29, 1974 - March 29, 1979 Shelter Island 8 30 85% May 31, 1974 - Heights Assoc. May 31, 1979 Bulova Watch February 28, 1975 - February 27, 1980 Sag Harbor 25 30 85% DRAFT (Proposed) VI. Montauk Point-Atlantic Ocean U.S. Air Force 7.5 30 85% May 31, 1974 - May 31, 1979 VII. Moriches Bay-Atlantic Ocean L.I. Duck Farms 70 February 28, 1975 - Coop. February 28, 1980 (200) (Until July 1, 1977) Moriches Duck Farm 113 February 28, 1975 - February 28, 1980 (142) (Until July 1, 1977) Jurgielewic� Duck 120 February 28, 1975 - Farm February 28, 1980 (230) S-29 Table E (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS | I5 DAY BOD 1|~~~ .~~1 ~EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMI] WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/i REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE XI. Jamaica Bay Cedarhurst 250 30 85% July 31, 1974 - July 31, 1979 Inwood 625 30 85% September 30, 1974 - September 30, 1979 NYC-Rockaway 11,260 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 Mainenides Inst. 1.5 30 85% June 30, 1975 - June 30, 1980 NYC-Jamaica 25,020 30 85% January 31, 1975 -' January 31, 1980 NYC-Spring Cr. ** ** ** January 31, 1975 - Auxiliary June 30, 1977 NYC-26th Ward 21,300 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 NYC-Coney Island 41,300 45 55% January 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 1. Values given are for 30-day averages for municipal discharges and daily averages for industries. 2. Where limits are given for lbs./day and for mg/I, the more stringent is the controlling. 3. The symbol , indicates that a value has not been established. 4. The symbol ***, indicates that self-monitoring schedules have been established, in lieu of interim effluent limits. S-30 Table E (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD | |AYO.DVEFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT WASTE SOURCE Ilbs./day mg/l REMOV TO EXPIRATION DATE VIII. Great South Bay-Atlantic Ocean Patchogue *** ** ** July 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 Ocean Beach 125 30 85% June 28, 1974 - June 27, 1979 Yaphank SD PROPOSED (Proposed) Suffolk SD #2 PROPOSED (Proposed) IX. South Oyster Bay-Atlantic Ocean S.W.S.D. __PROPOSED (Under Const.) West Central S.D. PROPOSED (Proposed) X. East Bay-Middle Bay-Hempstead Bay-Atlantic Ocean Nassau SD #3 11,300 30 85% January 31, 1975 - Cedar Creek January 31, 1980 Jones Beach 625 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 Freeport 2,837 85 72% May 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977. (To be discontinued) Nassau SD #2 30 85% December 31, 1974 - Bay Park June 30, 1977 Long Beach 35 75% February 28, 1975 - June 30, 1977 West Long Beach 375 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 Lawrence 375 30 85% February 28, 1974 - February 28, 1979 S-31 I.- INTRODUCTION 1.1. Scope and Purpose The following water quality management plan outlines the Department of Environmental Conservation's water quality management program in planning area 17 - Atlantic Ocean-Long Island Sound. This is neither a broad water and related land use plan nor a basinwide facility plan; it is a document that identified the basin's water quality problems and solutions including a determination of existing water quality, applicable standards and known significant point and non-point sources of pollution. it includes effluent limitations, remedial solutions, priorities and abatement schedules. Moreover, this plan centralizes the results of all levels of water quality planning and it is compatible with water resources and land use planning in the basin. Planning area 17 is a basic resource unit for which plans to meet water quality objectives can be developed somewhat independently of plans in adjacent hydrologic units. Boundaries of this unit were selected on the basis of relationships between present and future waste discharges and water quality impact and response. This is one of several phase I basin plans that are being prepared Statewide to coordinate and direct the State's water quality decisions and to provide essential documentation of wise use and management of several billion dollars in public funds for pollution abatement. On-going areawide waste treatment management programs will result in the development of phase II plans for all the basins of the State. 1.2. Process of Plan Formulation This water quality management plan was prepared under New York State' s continuing planning process pursuant to Section 303(e) of the 1972 Federal 1_1 Water Pollution Control Act (Pt 92-500). it is a basic component of New York State's pollution abatement program submittal to the Environmental 4 Protection Agency under Section 106 of the 1972 Act and is a prerequisite for program grants and participation in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. Plan formulation has been in accordance with regulations promulgated by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and published as Title 40 Part 130 and 131 of the Code of Federal Regulations and in accordance with EPA planning guidelines published in September 1974. Four basic steps are involved in the plan formulation process. First, water quality problems are identified in physical, chemical, biological and qualitative terms through water quality monitoring and surveillance programs. Second, existing and proposed classifications and standards are identified for the water bodies. The classifications and standards set forth the highest and best use objective for the waters and the criteria for evaluating the attainment for each objective. Proposed reclassifications are identified from available plans for water supply, fish, wildlife and recreation. Third, significant industrial, municipal and known non-point sources of pollution and wastewater characteristics are identified. Fourth, effluent limitations, abatement schedules, remedial solutions and priorities are set forth for each significant discharge. Determination of effluent limitations and abatement schedules are an integral part of the US EPA permit program and New York State certification process. Part of 303(e) plan formulation is accomplished simultaneously with the evaluation of permit requirements. Effluent limitations are established in accordance with best practical treatment requirements defined in the 1972 Federal Water Pollution I-2 Control Act and USEPA regulations, or in accordance with NYS treatment require- ments to maintain water quality standards. Municipalities and industries are required to meet the more stringent of these two limitations. Remedial solutions for pollution abatement are integrated into the plan based on completed comprehensive sewerage studies, existing wastewater facility reports, periodic municipal need assessments, and available water and land resources programs, plans and activities of Federal, State, local and private organizations. Investigations in the wastewater facility reports include assessments of flood hazard areas and use of available floodplain information for -roper siting of future treatment plants. The most recent Department of Environmental Conservation list of priorities for pollution abatement is dated May 21, 1976. These priorities are reviewed and revised annually. 1.3. Public Participation - Public Hearings Participation of the public has been provided for and encouraged throughout the planning process so as to obtain greater responsiveness of governmental actions to public concerns and priorities and to improve popular understanding of official programs and actions. The New York State Department of Environmental- Conservation is quite proud of its conservation education program and the dialogue that has developed with grass root organizations over the years. Through the media of the bimonthly magazine "The Conservationist" and the monthly newsletter "Environment", environmental sciences, subjects of interest and issues are explained and the public is kept informed of the progress and status of pollution abatement, government funding, environmental legislation and plans for pollution abatement. I-3 Each of the many components of this water quality management plan was developed cooperatively with local governmental units or subject to public hearings. The countywide comprehensive sewerage studies which identify both the short-range and long-range facility needs, were conducted under the direction of county units of government. The need and scope of areawide waste treatment management planning, conducted under Section 208 of PL 92-500, was defined through public meetings sponsored by designated local-regional planning agencies. New York State's municipal priority system was featured in several articles of New York-DEC's. newsletter "Environment" and presented at public hearings as part of the annual State 106 program grant submittal to USEPA. Effluent limitations and compliance schedules were developed as part of the EPA-NYS permit program. Again, opportunities for public hearings are a requirement in the permit-certification process. Finally, this plan with each component presented in context of the total is presented at a hearing for public review and comment. A record of the hearing and major controversies raised at the hearing, along with the disposition thereof, will become part of New York State's plan submittal to US EPA. I.4. Updating the Plan Portions of the plan will be revised annually or as necessary to reflect changes in State policies, programs, standards, permits and water quality management defined through ongoing 208, 201, Coastal Zone Management and other planning studies. 1.5. Terminology Throughout the report, technical terms, letter symbols and acronyms are used for explanation and abbreviation purposes. A glossary has been added at the end of this report to aid the reader in understanding these terms and symbols. i-4 II. BACKGROUND FOR WATER QUALITY 11.1. Description of Area All of the marine waters of New York State, with the exception of the Lower Hudson River, are included within Planning Area 17. Boundaries of the area are defined along watershed divides, to include all land that drains into these marine waters. The area includes all of Long Island and Staten Island, portions of Manhattan Island and Westchester County, and most of the Bronx. Three states border the planning area: New Jersey to the west, Connecticut to the northeast, and Rhode Island to the east in Block Island Sound. Figure 1 shows the boundaries of this 2,200 square mile area. The western portions of Manhattan, Bronx and Westchester Counties drain into the Hudson River and are included in Planning Area 17-01 - Hudson River-Main Stem. In northern Westchester County, the planning area is bounded by Planning Area 13-02 - Hudson River-Croton Watershed. There are numerous fresh water streams and ponds within the planning area, but the dominant waters of the area are groundwater and tidal salt water. Major water bodies are the Atlantic Ocean, Long Island Sound, the East River, Harlem River, the New York Harbors, Great South Bay, Great Peconic Bay, and Block Island Sound. Nassau County and Suffolk County and a portion of Queens County use the groundwater of Long Island as a primary water supply. The groundwater feeds streams and bays with fresh water and is an important water resource of the area. 11.2. Economy, Population and Land Use The Atlantic Ocean-Long Island Sound Planning Area encompasses the Nassau-Suffolk Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). The II-1 H ~~~~~~~~WESTCHESTERt I N~~~~~~TRS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ID NEW/BRN STATEN ~~~~~~~~~~PLANNIG AREA DOND17SAE:MLE F igure 1J OA7TM remainder of the planning area comprises a portion of the New York-New Jersey SMSA, which in total includes the five Boroughs of New York City, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam and Bergen, New Jersey. 11.2.a. Population In 1970 the planning area, part of the most urbanized and most densely populated area of the nation, had approximately 10,800,000 inhabitants. New York City, with a population of nearly 7.9 million, accounted for about 73 percent of the total basin population. The Nassau-Suffolk SMSA contained about 24 percent of the basin population, and Westchester County the remaining three percent. Table I. summarizes historical and projected population change. In this and other tables, the January 1976 county population projections, prepared by the NYS Economic Development Board, are shown in parentheses,-while sub-county units and totals were compiled in September 1975 and based on June 1974 or earlier projections. Basin population increased by seven percent from 1960 to 1970, compared to nearly nine percent for the State and 13 percent for the nation as a whole. Growth within the basin was unevenwith the Nassau- Suffolk area accounting for 82 percent of the basin population increase and New York City nearly 16 percent. Population densities within the basin are among the highest in the nation and range from 67,000 persons/square mile in the Borough of Manhattan to 160 persons/square mile in the Town of Pound Ridge in Westchester County. Urbanization, a correlative of the high densities which occur in most of the basin, is very extensive in the study area. New York City is 100 percent urbanized, as is practically all of Nassau County. Approximately 90 percent of Suffolk's population is urban. The section of the basin in Westchester County ranges from complete II-3 TABLE 1 HISTORICAL AND PROTECTED POPULATION ATLANTIC OCEAN AND LONG ISLAND SOUND BASINS 1960-2000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Atlantic Ocean and 10,070,639 10,787,431 10,952,000 11,311,200 11,484,500 Long Island Sound Basins New York City (Total) 7,781,984 7,895,563 7,759,600 7,725,400 7,607,200 (7,362,200) (7,082,100) (6,876,200) Nassau-Suffolk SMSA 1,966,955 2,555,868 2,867,600 3,268,700 3,564,300 (2,766,200) (3,044,500) (3,216,100) Nassau County 1,300,171 1,428,838 1,457,300 1,538,100 1,563,200 (1,394,800) (1,391,100) (1,349,900) Suffolk County 666,784 1,127,030 1,410,300 1,730,600 2,001,100 (1,371,500) (1,653,400) (1,866,100) Westchester County (Part) 321,700 336,000 324,800 317,100 312* Westchester County (Total) 808,891 894,406 900,000 900,100 900,000 (880,600) (882,300) (873,000) NOTE: Values in parentheses are EDB 1/76 values for counties, and the other county and subcounty projections were compiled in 9/75 and based on 6/74 county values. SOURCE: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970 NYS Economic Development Board, June 1974 (January 1976) NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, September 1975 9/75 Rev. 9/76 II-40 1I-4 urbanization to little or -none in the Towns of Lewisboro and Pound Ridge ("urban", according to the Bureau of the Census, is any village, city, etc. (not town) with 2,500 or more population). 11.2.b. Economy The almost total urbanization of the planning area has produced the largest and most concentrated industrial and consumer market in the nation. Economic concentrations are to be found in manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, service industries, banking, finance, advertising, engineering, business management and research. In addition, the area offers a rich diversity of cultural, social, education and recreational amenities not readily available in other regions of the nation. The planning area, with an economy that dwarfs other regional economies, had a labor force of about 4.5 million persons in 1970. This concentrated reservoir of manpower, of whom 4.3 million were employed, were engaged in producing a myriad of products and services. Non-manufacturing, including service industries, employed about 79 percent of basin residents in 1970, or almost four times the number engaged in manufacturing (20.6 percent). In contrast, the nation as a whole employed 70 percent in non-manufacturing and nearly 26 percent in manufacturing. During the sixties, area service-oriented businesses grew, especially in New York City, increasing the number employed in non-manufacturing as opposed to manufacturing which began to decline. II.2.c. New York Citv New York City is, of course, the major economic entity of the basin. With more than 3.5 million employed in non-agricultural jobs in 1973, the City is the largest labor market in the nation. The service industry is the leading employer, followed by trade, manufacturing and government. 11-5 II.2.a.c.l. Population The demand for services in New York City stems from its huge resident population. As the gateway to the rest of the nation during most of our nation's history, New York City reached a peak population in 1970 of 7,895,563, up 1.5 percent from 1960. The largest city in the nation exceeds the population of 43 of the 50 states. Although natural increase (excess of births over deaths) generated the aforementioned increase, net out-migration during the past two decades has been significant. For the period from 1950 to 1960, City net migration totalled 792,000 or -10 percent of the 1950 population of 7,891,957. During the 1960-1970 decade, net migration declined to 519,000 or -6.7 percent of the 1960 population of 7,781,984. Latest Bureau of the Census preliminary estimates for the 1970-1974 period are 464,200 net migrants or -5.9 percent of the 1970 population of 7,895,563. Table 4 summar- izes historical and recent migration data for the metropolitan area as published by the U. S. Bureau of the Census. 11.2.c.2. Economy Manufacturing is highly diversified with about 24,000 small and medium sized firms as of 1972. The variety of skills of the ample labor force and the availability of low-cost manufacturing locations have made the City an innovator of products and new industries. Although, the recent economic decline has greatly impacted the manufacturing sector, 39 percent of all manufacturing employment in the State was in the City as of March 1975. New York City is the service, trade and finance center of the nation. In 1973, employment in these three industries accounted for over one-half of all non-agricultural employment. Of the three, services II-6 employed 788.8 thousand persons or 41 percent of the 1,916 million three- industry employment total. The service industries, growing since 1960, are expected to continue to expand in employment, due in part to their labor intensiveness and relatively low productivity per employee. The shift to a service- oriented economy is a national phenomenon and is a characteristic, according to some economic observers, of mature industrial economies. At the national level, services employment increased, relatively, from 21 to 24 percent of total employment from 1960 to 1970. By way of contrast, the percentage of people employed in manufacturing decreased by 10 percent. Services employment in New York State increased by 28 percent from 1960 to 1970 while the nation's grew by 37 percent. From a relative point of view, services employment in the State has been greater than that of the nation, 27 versus 24 percent in 1970. Within the State, New York City services employment accounted for slightly less than one- half of all State services employment in 1970. The most significant services industry employment is found in hospitals, health services, schools and colleges, welfare, religious and non-profit organizations, and legal, engineering and miscellaneous professional services. 11.2.c.3. Outlook Although decadal out-migration rates were declining for the City as a whole, recent economic downturns suggest the rate may be on the increase. Population projections prepared as of January 1976 by the NYS Economic Development Board indicate an overall City population decline of nearly 13 percent by the year 2000. These projections, demographic in nature, are based upon a series of related assumptions concerning future fertility, mortality and migration rates. II-7 Population projections for the State and individual counties were prepared by the NYS- Economic Development Board in January 1976. These projections indicate a greater decline in New York City populations than had been projected in June 1974. Both 1974 and 1976 projections are summnarized in Table 5. Only Richmond County is now projected to exper-. ience a population increase. Non-farm employment projections for the State as a whole, while tentative in nature and subject to revision, show an increase of seven percent for the 1970-1980 decade, much lower than the experience of the 1960-1970 perid. This slower growth is based in part on the performance of the State's economy vis-a-vis the national economy during the recovery period of the 1970 recession. Although the nation began its recovery in November of 1970, non-farm employment in the State in 1973 was still below the level of 1969. The reduced growth rate also seems logical from a population projection point of view, discussed earlier. In addition, recent economic declines, notably rising unemployment rates during the 1974-1975 period, also tend to reinforce the slow employment growth projected for the State. New York City, with approximately 51 percent of State total employ- ment in 1970, is expected to have an employment decline of eight percent by 1980. Manu facturing employment will decline absolutely and relatively from 20 to 15 percent of total 1980 employment, continuing the long term decline of the 1960's. In line with State projections, non-durable goods employment, as a percent of total employment, will fall from 16 percent to 12 percent. Non-manufacturing industries, particularly services, will be relatively more important by 1980. In 1980, nearly 85 percent of all City employment will be in non-manufacturing as opposed to 80 percent I1-8 in 1970. Within this sector, services and miscellaneous employment in 1980 will rise to 34 percent from slightly over 29 percent in 1970, an increase of 17 percent. In summary, the New York City economic outlook, while far from outstanding, nevertheless is one of great strength, if for no other reason than sheer size. Recent budgetary problems will undoubtedly force a review of City economic weaknesses as well as its strengths, and corrections developed. As the trade, financial and services center of the nation, the City will continue to be a significant economic force in the State and nation. II.2.d. Nassau-Suffolk II.2.d.l. Population Jutting eastward into the Atlantic Ocean, Long Island is a finger of land extending east from New York City. With 2.6 million inhabitants as of 1970, the Nassau-Suffolk SMSA is the second largest SMSA in the State, and has a population larger than 23 states. Population increased by nearly 600,000 or 29.9 percent during the 1960's. The nation's population increased by 13.3 percent and that of New YorkState by 8.7 percent during the 1960-70 decade. Nassau-Suffolk experienced a population explosion beginning in the 1950's. Residents of New York City and other areas faced with urban pressures, rising real income and the availability of Island undeveloped land, migrated in large numbers to Nassau and Suffolk counties. These areas have all experienced significant in-migration since 1950. Nassau, for example, had a net migration rate of 70 percent for the 1950-1960 decade. Suffolk's rate, 116 percent, was one of the highest in the nation. Net migration for the State as a whole was 1.8 11-9 percent. During the 1960-1970 period, Nassau County, largely at satura- tion level, had a net migration rate of 1.1 percent. Suffolk on the other hand, continued to have substantial net migration, 49.3 percent. These influxes of new residents raised densities to 5000 in Nassau and in the five western towns of Suffolk to a little over 1800 persons per square mile in 1970. II.2.d.2. Economy Accompanying this population growth was a proliferation of people- serving facilities. Schools, churches, shopping plazas and highways increased at a rapid rate. Sewage treatment plants became overloaded. Single-family residences began to dot the Island landscape and gobbled land in a prodigious fashion. These single-family residences were initially constructed with cesspools. Since cesspools have a limited useful life and subsequently fail, health hazards due to overflowing cesspools are created. In addition, as the density and development increased, widespread pollution of the groundwater aquifer resulted. As the population base grew, the economy expanded and office and industrial space construction accelerated. National defense needs, particularly aircraft, added inpetus to the industrial development of the economy. Aircraft, electronics and the instrument industries flourished. Gradually, however, diversification reduced the importance of defense-related production and non-manufacturing activities became paramount in the Island economy. Table 6 summarizes non-agricultural employment statistics for the Nassau-Suffolk SMSA. Non-agricultural employment in the two county SMSA increased at slightly more than double the population growth rate at 30 percent or 62 percent from 1960-1970. The State as a whole increased by nearly 16 percent and the nation by 30 percent during the same period. Greatest II-10 staff gains were made in Island non-manufacturing industries. These included finance, insurance and real estate; trade; services and govern- ment. The shift to service-oriented employment over goods-producing employment is a national phonomenon as well as a regional one. This trend is projected to continue, although at a decreasing rate. Manufacturing employment increased by 24 percent from 1960 to 1970, chiefly in the non-durable goods industries. Within this sector, employment in the textile mill product industry more than doubled. Employment gains in the apparel and printing industries were also impressive during the decade. Statewide, non-durable goods employment declined by 12 percent and total manufacturing employment by six percent. Table 7 summarizes State non-agricultural employment data. II.2.d.3. Outlook Within the SMSA, changes in the economies of Nassau and Suffolk Counties have occurred and will occur in the future as national and regional economic and demographic forces continue to have their impact. The latter, the eastward movement of population on Long Is land, has been the most significant force for change in the Island's history. Nassau County has largely experienced the population wave which is now impacting Suffolk County. Recent Bureau of.the Census data indicate a slight decline in Nassau population and an eight percent increase in Suffolk's population since 1970. Natural increase was chiefly responsible for Nsa's 60-70 growth, while Suffolk's was in-migration. Since 1970, both the national and the regional economies have been beset by energy shortages, unemployment and inflation. Falling birth rates have resulted in near zero population growth for the nation and the State, and the impact of this and the twin ills of inflation and unemployment call for short term projections based on most recent data. For comparison purposes, two population projections are presented: those of OPS, now the NYS Economic De-velopment Board, and a preliminary set prepared by the Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board. Tables I and 8 summarize these projections. For the hi-county area, the January 1976 NYS Economic Development Board projections show a 30-year rate of increase (1970-2000) of 26 percent increase in Nassau County and a 66 percent increase in Suffolk County. These projected increases are roughly half the increases which had been expected in 1973. Migration, the main component of Suffolk's population growth in the last 20 years, is expected to moderate, and a continuing decline in the County's general fertility rate is probable. The general fertility rate (births/number of women 15-44) has declined from 85.5 in 1970 to a provisional estimate of 65.1 in 1975 or 24 percent. Accompanying a slow growth population projection and the previously noted current economic woes of the nation and the region, a generalized short-term employment forecast is reasonable. Preliminary projections of employment by industry prepared by the NYS Department of Labor for occupational manpower purposes for the 1970- 1980 decade indicate continued growth of Island employment, but at a reduced rate. New York State non-agricultural employment for the 1970- 1980 period is expected to increase by 7.6 percent. Island employment, however, is forecast to increase by 40 percent, with most of the growth occurring in Suffolk. Good gains are expected in the service, trade, finance and government sectors. More moderate gains and some declines characterize industries within the manufacturing sector. II-12 The projected distribution of employment by industry shows a continuing decline in the importance of manufacturing, in terms of total employment, and a rise in that of non-manufacturing. Manufacturing employment, however, is expected to increase by about 11 percent. Employment in the durable goods industries will slip from 14 to 10 percent of total employment in line with past trends. Non-durable goods employment in the textiles, paper, chemicals, plastics, etc. industries is forecast to expand by one-third and account for six percent of total employment by 1980. Preliminary non-manufacturing Island employment projections indicate an increase by nearly one-half by 1980. A little over four-fifths of all Island employment will be in this sector. As previously mentioned, services employment, which includes business, professional and personal services, if forecast to continue its historical growth. Regionally, services employment will increase by about 60 percent, while that of the State will grow by one-quarter during the coming decade. Family median income, $13,475 in 1970, was over 25 percent greater than that of the State, which was $10,617. This relative affluence augurs well for the future of the Island economy. II.2.e. Westchester County The last section of the Atlantic Ocean--Long Island Sound Basin-- to be discussed is in the eastern section of Westchester County. Located immediately north of New York City and part of the New York, New York-New Jersey SMSA, Westchester County is one of the wealth- iest in the nation. In 1970, median family income was $13,784 compared to $10,617 for the State and $9,590 for the nation. Over 44 percent of Westchester families had incomes of $15,000 or more compared to 26.5 percent for the State as a whole 11-13 One of the nation's most famous suburban counties, Westchester has numerous pleasant residential communities and rural sections dotted with large estates. Commuting is heavy to New York City, with nearly 30 percent of the County's residents working in the City. 11.2.e.1 Population With an average density of 2000 person/square mile, nearly one-half of the County population lives in five cities. They include Yonkers, New Rochelle, Mount Vernon, White Plains and Rye. Portions or all of the latter four are within the basin. All are within 15 miles of New York City. Population of the County increased by 10.6 percent from 1960 to 1970 (808,891 to 894,406). Most of the growth, however, has been outside the cities, mainly in villages and the unincorporated areas in the northern part of the County. Basin population grew slowly during the 1960's, 4.5 percent, as the western section along the Hudson River and the northern section of the County gained population in response to industrial and residential development. As of 1970, approximately 94 percent of the County popula- tion was classified as urban, one percent greater than in 1960. Density of the two areas wholly within the basin, the City of New Rochelle and the Town of Rye, had 1970 densities of 7,400 and 6,200, respectively. Table 10 summarizes historical and projected population for Westchester County and that section of the basin within the County. II.2.e.2. Economy The economy of Westchester County has continued to expand for several decades. Non-agricultural employment, for example, increased by 31 percent from 1960 to 1970, while New York State grew by 16 percent. Some of the largest industrial plaits in the New York metropolitan area II-14 are located in the County. General Motors, International Business Machine Corporation and the Standard Oil Company are but a few of the well-known national corporations located in the County. The manufacturing sector, employing 21 percent of County residents in 1970, has concentrations of employment in the following industries: machinery (except electrical), food products, printing and publishing, electrical machinery and apparel. For the most part, these were growth industries during the l96O's. In 1970, approximately 78 percent of County residents were employed in non-manufacturing industries. This percentage was somewhat greater than the 75 percent for the State as a whole and reflects the large number of "white collar" occupations in this sector. More than two- fifths of those employed in non-manufacturing were engaged in providing services of a business, personal or professional nature. Trade activity, retail and wholesale, employed an additonal 25 percent of non-manufac-. turing employment. The balance of those employed in non-manufacturing are to be found in the following industries: utilities, finance, construction, mining and public administration. More recent employment data, summarized in Table 9 and based on place of work series, presents the growth of the non-manufacturing sector, particularly services jobs. From 1960 to 1970, services and miscellaneous employment increased by more than two-fifths in contrast to a 12 percent increase in total manufacturing employment. Floor space growth during the 1963-1972 period has been large in non-residential construction in the County according to the Westchester County Department of Planning. Office space accounted for one-third of all commercial floor space constructed. Transportation, communication and utilities, retail, and wholesale, warehousing, and automotive floor space construe- IT-15 tion totalled 32 percent, with industrial accounting for the balance of 12 percent. The non-goods producing segment of the County economy, as in other State regions and the nation, is becoming increasingly significant. II.2.e.3. Outlook Although theeconomy of Westchester County and that section of the basin has been expanding, the linkages to the New York City economy are still significant. Commuting flows are but one indication of the economic ties between Westchester and the City. Indirectly, therefore, the health of the County's economy is partially dependent upon the City economy. The forecast flow-growth and/or decline of employment in the City will have an adverse effect upon the County economy, which is not measurable at present. Recent population estimates by the Bureau of the Census suggest a minor decline in County population from the 1970 April Census Level of 894,406. Net migration of some -24,000 residents or -2.7 percent of the 1970 figure is the principal reason for the estimated 1974 decline in total population of -1.5 percent. Net migration is the difference between net change and natural increase. Preliminary population projections by the Westchester County Planning Department assume a relatively stable population in the neighborhood of 900,000 to 1985. This projection is based, in part, on recent declines in population attributable to out-migration and declining birth rates. More recent total County population projections prepared by the NYS Economic Development Board indicate a two percent decline in population to 873,000 to 2000. A preliminary allocation of the 900,000 figure to the MCD level and below, presented in Table 10, is schematic and a tentative allocation at best. However, basin population is forecast to decline by seven percent by the year 2000. All cities within or partially within the basin--Mount Vernon, New Rochelle and Rye--are expected to slowly lose 0 ~~population or stablize at best. Rye, however, may make slight gains if recent trends continue. Population growth is also forecast for the northern areas of the basin, particularly the Towns of Bedford, Lewisboro and North Castle. Moderate growth may occur in the villages in line with past trends. Small area projections for 30 years, at best, are educated guesses and subject to large errors. While no employment projections are presented for this section of the basin, an assumption of slow growth in labor force and employment can be predicted upon the preliminary stable population projection and the previously discussed New York City employment forecast. 11.2.f. Land Use Land use has been identified in detail in the State's Land Use and Natural Resource Inventory Study (LUNR). The inventories are based on 1967-1968 areal photographs for upstate New York and 1969-1970 areal photographs for New York City and Long island. Table 11 is a summary of land use for the planning area. Over one-quarter of the area is water. New York City, Nassau and Westchester are predominantly residential, with much land use for transportation. Westchester and Suffolk Counties have large areas in woodland, and there are even significant areas of agriculture in Suffolk County. In summary, land use varies from the intensive urban-industrial New York City area to the rural-agricultural areas of eastern Long Island. To some extent, water quality parallels land development--the more intensive the development, the more difficult the water quality * ~~problem. 11-17 TABLE 2 LABOR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT UNITED STATES NEW YORK STATE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND LONG ISLAND SOUND BASINS 1970 LABOR FORCE EMPLOYMENT AGRICULTURE MANUFACTURING NON-MANUFACTURING UNITED STATES 80,051,046 76,553,599 '2,840,488. 19,837,208 53,875,903 New York State 7,421,579 .7,124,001 90,076 1,722,377 5,311,548 Basin - Total 4,466,178 4,292,333 16,676 883,847 3,391,810 New York City 3,330,803. 3,191,370 6,408 657,054 2,527,908 = ~ Nassau-Suffolk SMSA 988,686 958,177 8,913 198,838 750,426 Ge Nassau County 585,516 569,199 3,479 114,154 *451,566 Suffolk County 403,170 388,978 5,434 84,684 298,860 Westchester County 146,689 142,786 1,355 27,955 113,476 *Estimates SOURCES: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970 �NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 0 '0 *90 TABLE 3 NON-AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT NEW YORK CITY 1960, 1970 -1974 (000) INDUSTRY 1960 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 TOTAL 3538.4 3743.6 3609.4 3561.3 3538.4 3458.4 Mining 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 Contract construction 125.3 10 110. 110.7 102.8 105.6 100.4 Transportation, public utilities 318.1 323.3 299.1 297.5 293.3 283.8 Wholesale, retail trade 744.8 735.5 704.3 695.2 685.8 666.4 Finance, insurance, real estate 386.0 459.6 450.9 446.5 435.2 428.3 Services and miscellaneous 607.3 784.2 771.2 777.4 789.9 790.1 Government 408.2 562.8 569.2 564.5 574.4 580.7 Manufacturing 946.8 766.2 702.4 675.8 652.8 607.2 Durable goods 228.5 177.7 158.0 152.5 149.1 142.0 Non-durable goods 718.3 588.5 544.4 523.4 503.6 465.2 SOURCE: New York State Department of Labor 9/75 II-19 TABLE 4 HISTORICAL AND RECENT MIGRATION RAES NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA 1960, 1970, 1974 NET MIGRATION NET MIGRATION PERCENT 1950 1960 1970 1950 1960 1970 AREA 1960 1970 7/1/74 1960 1970 7/1/74 NEW YORK CITY -791,904 -519,338 -464,200 - 10.0 - 6.7 - 5.9 Manhattan (New York) -353,795 -218,566 - 93,000 - 18.1 -12.9 - 6.0 Bronx -148,476 - 88,308 -116,200 -10.2 - 6.2 - 7.9 Queens. 74,361. 19,151 - 48,600 4.8 1.1 - 2.4 Brooklyn (Kings) =372,001 -279,994 -225,500 - 13.6 -10.7 - 8.7 Staten Island (Richmond) 8,007 48,379 19,100 4.2 21.8 6. PUTNAM 8,990 20,824 7,300 44.3 65.6 12.9 ROCKLAND 34,643 71,700 9,000 38.9 52.4 3.9 WESTCHESTER 110,278 17,464 - 24,000 17.6 2.2 - 2.7 NASSAU-SUFFOLK 789,171 342,843 10,800 83.2 17.4 0.4 Nassau 467,926 14,390 - 43,300 70.2 1.1 - 3.0 Suffolk 321,245 328,453 .54,100 116.5 49.3 4.8 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports P. 23, No. 7 P. 25, Nos. 461, 599 .9/75 II-20 TABLE 5 O2~~~ ~~HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED POPULATION ATLANTIC OCEAN AND LONG ISLAND SOUND BASIN NEW YORK CITY 1960-2000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 New York City 7,781,984 7,895,563 7,760,000 7,725,000 7,607,000 (7,362,200) (7,082,100) (6,876,200) Manhattan (New York) 1.698,281 1,539,233 1,429,000 1,385,000 1,345,000 (1,371,000) (1,254,600) (1,169,600) Bronx 1,424,815 1,471,701 1,476,000 1,451,000 1,410,000 (1,344,200) (1,274,300) (1,222,900) Queens 1,809,578 1,987,174 2,029,000 2,050,000 2,002,000 (1,932,000) (1,887,900) (1,830,700) Brooklyn (Kings) 2,627,319 2,602,012 2,468,000 2,401,000 2,354,000 0*~~~~~~~~~ ~~~(2,358,100) (2,225,900) (2,127,800) Staten Island (Richmond) 221,991 295,443 358,000 439,000 496,000 (356,900) (439,500) (525,200) NOTE: The projections in parentheses are EDB 1/76 values for counties. The other projections were compiled for county and sub-county areas in 9/75, and were based on 6/74 projections. SOURCE: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970 New York State Economic Development Board, June 1974 (January 1976). 9/75 Rev. 9/76 II-21 TABLE 6 NON-AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT NASSAU-SUFFOLK SMSA 1960, 1970 - 1974 (000) INDUSTRY ' 1960 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 TOTAL 448.5 725.6 ' 728.7 751.6 793.6 803.9 Contract construction 34.9 38.0 39.9 40.7 46.1 41.2 Transportation, public utilities 21.6 33.4 33.5 35.4 35.2 34.7 Wholesale, retail trade 99.6 190.8 192.9 202.6 210.8 213.0@ Finance, insurance, real estate 17.4 33.8 36.4 39.0 41.3 43.3 Services, mining, miscellaneous 72.0 133.3 137.7 141.9 153.6 159.3 Government 78.8 144.1 147.4, 149:2 154.2 159.8' Manufacturing 124.1 153.3 140.8 142.8 152.4 152.6 Durable goods 95.2 104.6 92.1 92.9 99.3 100.8 Non-durable goods 29.0 48.7 48.7 49.9 53.1 51.8 SOURCE: New York State Department of Labor 9/75 II-22 TALE 7 NON-AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT NEW YORK STATE 1960, 1970 - 1974 (000) INDUSTRY 1960 '1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 TOTAL 6181.9 7152.9 -7005.2 7027.5 7124.5 7084.8 Mining 9.1 7.9 7.4 7.1 7.3 7.5 Contract construction 261.8 266.6 272.1 268.1 279.0 262.7 . _Tasotto, pulcutlte Transportation, public utilities 482.2 500.6 471.7 472.8 470.2 457.8 Wholesale, retail trade -1251.2 1445.7 1422.3 1445.0 1459.7 1443.0 Finance, insurance, real estate 483.2 595.6 592.3 594.7 589.6 587.2 Services and miscellaneous 978.0 1358.1 1367.0 1393.7 1434.6 1453.5 Government 837.7 1217.7 1238.9 1242.6 1265.7 1292.0 Manufacturing 1878.7 1760.6 1633.4 1601.5 1618.4 1581.2 Durable goods 817.7 828.1 757.7 749.8 784.1 790.1 Non-durable goods 1061.0 932.6 875.8 851.8 834.2 791.1 SOURCE: New York State Department of Labor 0 9/75 II-23 Table 8 NASSAU-SUFFOLK REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR THE NASSAU-SUFFOLK REGION 1980, 2000, AND 2020 Projected Population 1980 (Preliminary First Estimate First Estimate Town or City Revision) 2000* 2020** Glen Cove 28,500 29,500 31,500 Hempstead 850,000 885,000 935,000 Long Beach 35,000 40,000 45,000 North Hempstead 250,000 260,000 280,000 Oyster Bay 355,000 370,000 400,000 Nassau 1,518,500 1,584,500 1,691,500 (1,394,800) (1,349,900) Babylon 240,000 290,000 290,000 Brookhaven 425,000 810,000 890,000 East Hampton 15,000 55,000 85,000 Huntington 240,000 285,000 290,000 Islip 360,000 390,000 400,000 Riverhead 32,000 95,000 175,000 Shelter Island 2,000 7,000 11,000 Smithtown 160,000 172,000 179,000 Southampton 45,000 116,000 200,000 Southold 23,000 65,000 120,000 Suffolk 1,542,000 2,285,000 2,640,000 (1,371,500) (1,866,100) The Region 3,060,500 3,869,500 4,331,500 (2,766,200) (3,216,100) * Modification of O.P.S., Solid Waste Study (Nassau) and Water Supply Study (Suffolk) Projections ** Modification of Solid Waste. Study and Water Supply Study Projections NOTE: Values in parentheses are EDB 1/76 values for counties. Source: Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board, March 12, 1973 NYS Economic Development Board, (January 1976). 9/75@ Rev. 9/76 II-24 TABLE 9 NON-AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT WESTCHESTER COUNTY 1960, 1970 - 1974 (000) INDUSTRY 1960 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 TOTAL 232.8 304.0 300.9 305.3 313.3 307.5 Contract construction 15.8 19.1 17.8 18.0 18.7 16.8 Transportation, public utilities 16.1 19.4 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.0 * ,, Wholesale, retail trade 49.3 69.2 68.9 70.8 72.8 69.6 Finance, insurance, real estate 10.9 14.4 14.6 15.3 15.9 16.1 Services, mining, miscellaneous 44.3 63.7 64.3 66.9 69.6 70.6 Government 30.3 44.3 46.3 47.4 49.0 50.0 MANUFACTURING 66.3 74.0 70.2 68.2 68.7 66.3 Durable goods 35.2 38.9 36.3 34.5 35.4 33.2 Non-durable goods 31.0 .35.1 33.9 33.7 33.2 33.1 -SOURCE: New York State Department of Labor 9/75 II-25 TABLE 10 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED POPULATION ATLANTIC' OCEAN AND LONG ISLAND SOUND BASINS WESTCHESTER COUNTY 1960 -2000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 WESTCHESTER COUNTY 808,891 894,406 900,000 900,000 900,000 (880,600) (882,300) (873,000) BASIN TOWNS 321,651 335,998 324,800 317,100 312,900 Bedford. T. 3,514 4,455 4,800' 4,800 4,900 Eastchester T. 8,178 9,500 8,800 8,400 8,200 Harrison T. 17,970 20,163 20,309 20,215 20,215 Lewisboro T. 1,080 1,714 2,100 2,300 2,500 Mamaroneck T. 29,107 31,243 30,800 30,300 29,800 Larchmont V. 6,789 7,203 7,700 7,900 8,000 Mamaroneck V. (Pt.) 10,555 11,038 9,700 9,700 9,700 Mount Vernon C. 63,341 60,648 55,200 52,200 50,700. New Castle T. 423 612 700 700 700 New Rochelle C. 76,812 75,385 70,300 67,300 65,800 North Castle T. 5,026 7,092 8,100 8,700 8,900 Pelham T. 13,404 13,933 13,500 13,200 13,000 North Pelham V. 5,326 5,184 5,100 5,000 5,000 Pelham Manor V. 6,114 6,673 6,300 6,100 6,000 Pelham V. 1,964 2,076 2,100 2,100 2,000 Pound Ridge T. 1,871 2,758 3,300 3,500 3,600 Rye C. 14,225 15,869 16,000 15,900 15,800 Rye T. 38,147 43,234 43,800 43,800 43,700 Mamaroneck V. (Pt.) 7,118 7,871 6,900 6,900 6,900 Port Chester V. 24,960 25,803 24,100 23,300 22,900 Scarsdale T. 13,331 14,267 14,000 13,800 13,800 Scarsdale V,. 13,331 14,267 14,000 13,800 13,800 Whiteplains C. 35,222 35,125 33,139 32,000 31,300 *Preliminary Projections SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of.Population: 1970 New York State Department of Environmental Conservatio; September 1975 NYS Economic DeveloDment Board (January 1976) 9/75 II-26 TABLE 11 LAND USE PLANNING TYPE OF USAGE AREA 17 2,3/ NASSAU NYC 2/ SUFFOLK WESTCHESTER 3/ S.M. % S M, 7 S.M. % S.M. % S.M. % ACTIVE AGRICULTURE 108 5 5.1 1 0.2 0 101.3 8 1.4 1 WOODLANDS 377 17 25.0 7 14.3 4 293.2 23 44.3 29 WETLANDS 51 2 16.8 5 7.9 2 25.0 2 1.1 1 WATER 577 26 65,1 19 112.3 27 376.0 29 23.9 16 H RESIDENTIAL 585 27 153.9 44 135.9 33 249.6 19 45.6 30 COMMERCIAL 60 3 14.7 4 24.3 6 17.4 1 3.3 2 INDUSTRIAL 50 2 8.4 2 17.8 4 22.3 2 1.7 1 PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC 90 4 18.0 5 28.3 7 38.5 3 4.8 3 OUTDOOR RECREATION 126 6 24.0 7 29.4 7 59.2 5 12.9 9 TRANSPORTATION 61 3 6.4 2 25.0 6 26.2 2 3.8 3 INACTIVE 108 5 12 5 _ 16.7 4 72�2 6 7.0 5 2,193 100 349.9 100 412.2 100 1,280.9 100 149.8 100 1/ Values from NYS OPC Lunar Study (1967-68 Upstate photos)(1969-70 New York-Long Island photos) 2/ New York City was not disaggregated so portions of Manhattan and the Bronx which drain to the Hudson are included. 3/ Westchester County was aggregated by Drainage Basins and represents that'portion of the county within Area 17 9/75 11.3. Planning Jurisdictions and Related Planning Activities Planning jurisdictions and special planning activities in the eight counties which lie wholly or partially within the area of the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin range from city, town a-ad village planning boards to various regional and interstate boards and commissions. Within the basin area, there exist all or parts of 135 cities, towns and villages, -nearly all of which have planning or zoning boards. Suffolk, Nassau and Westchester counties have individual county planning boards, with staffs providing extensive local planning assistance to municipalities as well as comprehensive countywide planning. The counties of Bronx, Kings, New York, Queens and Richmond are consolidated under the New York City Planning Commission. In addition, there are various interstate and regional agencies and commissions with planning responsibilities in the Long Island Sound! Atlantic Ocean Basin. The Tri-State Regional Planning Commission prepares projections of land use needs and coordinates the actions of planning agencies in 12 counties of New York, nine counties of New Jersey and six planning regions of Connecticut. Agencies concerned with water management problems of the region are the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, New England River Basins Commission and Interstate Sanitation Commission. Special State and Federal studies such as the Southeast New York Water Supply Study and the Long Island Sound Study, having significant implications for water management, have also been undertaken in the area from time-to-time. County comprehensive water supply and sewage studies, facilities planning and groundwater investigations have been conducted. Supplementing the work of government planning agencies, there are several voluntarily supported groups doing work in the areas, such as the Regional Plan Association of New York and the Metropolitan Regional Council. 11-28 11.3.a. New York Citv Planning Commission The New York City Planning Commission serves all five boroughs 10 ~~(counties) of the City. In 1969, they completed the first Citywide comprehensive plan which, while generally accepted in principal, has met with numerous specific controversies in implementation, a major one being revision of the City zoning. Subsequently, the voters of New York City, in November 1975, by a nearly three to two majority, agreed to do away with the City's charter section which requires a Citywide master plan. Plans can now be initiated by the Mayor, the City Planning Commission, the boards of the five boroughs, or any of 62 community planning boards throughout the City, which up to now have been strictly advisory to the City Planning Commission. The 1975 New York City charter revisions also establish a uniform * ~~method for reviewing land use changes that gives initial reviews to these community planning boards. This uniform procedure covers zoning, site selection, housing and urban renewal, and the sale and lease of City property. The community planning boards can now initiate their own planning procedures and hire their own professional planners. However, their plans are subject to adoption by the six-member City Planning Commission, which must have a representative from each of the five boroughs. II.3.b. County Planning Agencies Planning and zoning powers, in particular zoning, are among the most jealously guarded powers of local governments since they deal with land use regulations. In New York State only cities, villages and towns for areas outside of villages have zoning powers. Not all choose to exercise these powers since, especially in rural areas, zoning is still IT-29 very controversial. However, as another indicator of the very urban character of the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin, there are virtually no unzoned communities within it. While counties have no direct zoning powers in New York, they do, under certain circumstances, review local zoning changes. In addition, the technical assistance from their planning agencies and their county- wide plans influence local zoning decisions. Nassau County's Planning Department and Board serve two cities, three towns and 64 villages in a planning assistance and coordinating role. Because of the great number of individual communities with independent planning powers--in many cases, such home rule self-deter- mination was the very motivation for the formation of these communities-- the coordination role of the county in intermunicipal planning cannot be underestimated. No county in the State has more cities, towns and villages than Nassau and, except for New York City, more people (1.4 million). As a consequence, the provisions of Sections 239(1) and (m) of the General Municipal Law, providing for county planning board review of zoning changes within 500 feet of all municipal boundaries and of State or county lands or rights-of-way, have been heavily invoked in Nassau County. During the past five years, over 10,000 such zoning changes have been reviewed by the Nassau County Planning Commission. County planning activities in Suffolk and Westchester counties are quite similar to those in Nassau. While parts of these counties are less densely settled than Nassau, both Westchester and Suffolk have large total populations, one about 10 percent less than a million, the other, Suffolk, about 10 percent over. Both county planning agencies provide technical assistance to localities and have produced countywide master plans. T1-30 In addition to county-level zoning review functions under Section 239(1) and (m) of the General Municipal Law, the Suffolk County Planning Department, by county law, reviews and approves subdivisions within 500 feet of municipal boundaries and of State and county lands. The county exerts special building controls over all shorefront development. Suffolk County also reviews zoning changes and approves subdivisions within one mile of nuclear plants; this particular provision is undoubt- edly a consequence of the several nuclear facilities proposed on Long Island Sound within the county at Shoreham and at Jamesport. In all three counties, the county planning departments assist municipal Conservation Advisory Commissions in their efforts to identify and preserve environmentally sensitive areas within their communities. In the case of Nassau and Westchester, there are also county-level Environmental Management Councils whose planning activities are closely linked with their respective county planning departments. In Nassau and Suffolk counties, the county planning agencies participate in areawide waste treatment management planning by making input to the Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board, which is the designated areawide planning agency under Section 208 of PL 92-500. In Westchester County, the Planning Department is participating in "208" planning through the county Environmental Coordinating Agency, which has county planning representation on its policy board. II.3.c. County Water Management and Planning While zoning assistance and subdivision review functions of the county planning agencies strongly influence local development in all three counties, there is even more direct control at county level through the review actions of the county health, public works or environmental control agencies. 11-31 New York State has had long-standing laws (Public Health Law, Article 11, Title II, and Environmental Conservation Law, Article 17, Title 15), which have provided that residential subdivisions of five or more lots have adequate water supply and waste water disposal systems. Where city or county health departments, exist, as in the case of New York City and Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester Counties, the review and approval of sewer and water facilities for such subdivisions has usually been delegated to them. In addition, where waste treatment facilities are necessary for a new development, city or county health, environmental and/or public works agencies have approved such facilities on behalf of the State when they have demonstrated sufficient technical expertise to perform such review. Recently, under provisions of Section 402 of FL 92-500 (Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972) and of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law, Article 17, Title 8, the State Department of Environmental Conservation has received responsibility for issuance of all surface and subsurface discharge permits. This program is known as the State and National Pollutant Discharge Elimina- tion System (SPDES/NPDES). The Department, in conjunction with county governments, is reviewing the desirability of delegating to the counties the authority for issuing subsurface discharge permits. Permit authority has already been delegated to Suffolk County for privately owned sanitary waste discharges to groundwater. The extension of public water supply systems outside presently approved jursidictions, or the taking of either ground or surface waters for public supply or (beyond certain minimum flows) for private use, is subject to approval by the State Department of Environmental Conservation. Protection of such supply sources from contamination is also part of the 11-32 State Public Health Law. Again, city and county agencies may participate in such reviews and approvals and, in the case of pollution from contamnin- ation, may, if they are water suppliers, invoke and enforce through the State Health Commissioner, necessary protective regulations. The Nassau County Charter authorizes that county to plan for, organize and develop a county sewer system and other water treatement or supply facilities. It also provides that other municipal and private systems must obtain county approval. In Nassau County, such system and facility design approvals are carried out by the county Department of Public Works. In addition, of course, all State reviews and approvals such as SPDES/NPDES must also be obtained. in Suffolk County, the Department of Environmental Control has jurisdiction over water pollution control, including planning design, construction and maintenance of sewage disposal systems for the county sewer agency. Individual septic tanks and cesspools must be approved by the Suffolk County Health Department; also subject to such approval are industrial and other wastes -not discharged into a municipal system. Again, the State SPDES/NPDES permits are also required for all discharges. The Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities is responsible for construction and operation of both county water supply and waste water treatment facilities. Approval of other public and private water supply and sewage treatment facilities is the responsi- bility of the county Department of Health. 11.3.d. Other County Environmental Manageme~nt and Planning Activity Other environmental management activities which affect or are * ~~affected by the placement and intensity of development include the management of solid wastes, the control of air quality, the control of 11-33 surface--generally stormwater--runoff and shoreline erosion and the location of public buildings and transportation facilities. For all three counties outside New York City in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin, there are public works departments which handle their counties' responsibilities for certain public buildings, highways and other county transportation facilities. However, the other public works more directly related to environmental management concerns are split among several special agencies, differing in each county In Westchester, stormwater and solid wastes facilities are handled at the county level by their Department of Public Works. Some local municipalities also maintain their own solid wastes disposal facilities, including incinerators, but long range plans call for much consolidation. County involvement in air quality maintenance planning for the region is through the Westchester County Health Department. The Soil and Water Conservation District in Westchester is involved in flood and erosion control in a number of small watershed areas throughout the county, in conjunction with State and Federal agencies. In Suffolk County, the Department of Environmental Control, in addition to its county water resource protection and pollution control functions, is involved in air pollution abatement, solid wastes manage- ment and in the protection of the quality of the marine resources of the county. In Nassau County, solid wastes management is the prime responsibility of the city, town and village governments, subject to Nassau County Health Department approval. The county health department also enforces the county air pollution control ordinances in conjunction with State air quality regulations. Continuous air monitoring data (NYS Air Quality Report, and NYC Metropolitan Area Air Quality Implementation Plan Transportation Controls) show that much of Nassau's air quality problem is due to motor vehicle use in the county and adjacent New York City, 11-34 The Nassau County Department of Public Works reviews and approves drainage plans and projects for all its constituent municipalities. In Suffolk, the county planning board carries out a similar approval function, based on specific county regulations of stormwater runoff. The Suffolk County Department of Public Works, towns, villages and NYS Department of Transportation also review, approve and/or construct stormwater recharge facilities. It should be noted that recharge of stormwater into the aquifers beneath Long Island is a critical factor in slowing the depletion of groundwater supplies for Long Island. Since about 1960, recharge basins have been included as design features in subdivision plans in both Nassau and Suffolk Counties. II.3.e. The New York City Environmental Protection Administration Within New York City, the Environmental Protection Administration has been the principal agency for the planning and management of all 0 ~~environmentally related programs. Different departments and divisions within the Administration are responsible for the various programq from water supply and sewage treatment to air quality a-ad solid wastes manage- ment. They are the Bureau of Water Supply and the Bureau of Water Pollution Control in the Department of Water Resources, the Department of Air Resources and the Department of Sanitation, the latter having responsibility for all aspects of solid wastes management from collection to incineration to sanitary land fills. It should also be -noted that the New York City Board of Water Supply, which is not part of the City EPA, has planning and construction responsibilities for -new municipal water supply facilities. The EPA Bureau of Water Supply operates and maintains such facilities after their construction. Because of the overwhelming size of New York City's population, essentially all of its environmental management plans and activities have impacts on areas outside the City. Discharges from the City's II-35 sewage treatment plants are suspected of having a carryover effect on the marine waters of the other counties in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin. Provision of the City's water supply, primarily from the Catskills and Westchester, obviously, has impacts upon these areas and, in balance, also affects the groundwater supplies on Long Island. Ocean dumping of residual wastes by New York and other coastal communities impacts the quality of the adjacent marine resources of the basin. Incineration of solid wastes and operation of municipal heating and power facilities adds to the air pollution problems of the entire area. The interdependencies and interactions of the many municipalities in the New York City metropolitan area make totally independent planning by an individual community both impractical and unreal. Considerable intermunicipal coordination is essential, even for town and village plans. II.3.f. Regional Planning in the New York Metropolitan Area The New York Metropolitan Planning and Development Region is one of the 11 regional areas designated in New York State by the Governor in 1971. It is composed of 14 counties, eight of which are included wholly or partially in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin; most of the balance of the region lies in the Hudson Basin. The region contains nearly 12.3 million people, which is over two-thirds of the total population of the State. Because of its size and diversity, at the time of designation as a planning and development region, three subregions were also designated for regional planning purposes. These are the Nassau-Suffolk subregion which covers those two counties and is served by a bi-county regional planning board, the New York City subregion served by the New York City Planning Commission, and the Mid- Hudson subregion covering Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Sullivan II-36 Ulster and Westchester counties. There is no official regional planning unit for this latter subregion. Only a small portion of it in southern Westchester County lies in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin. II.3.g. Tri-State Regional Planning Commission The Tri-State Regional Planning Commission is the official regional planning and coordinating agency for the New York Metropolitan Planning and Development Region in New York State and for those portions of the states of Connecticut and New Jersey lying within the greater New York metropolitan area. Tri-State was created in 1961 as a transportation planning agency for the multi-state metropolitan area and expanded'into a comprehensive planning agency by interstate compact 10 years later. While the original emphasis remains, regional transportation planning is now integrated with land use, housing, parks and recreation, and environmental management planning. The generalized land use plan, the Regional Development Guide, provides policy guidance for public decisions on the kinds of facilities that can serve and shape the Region's physical development. The Guide includes adopted estimates of people, housing and jobs which, in turn, are used to forecast land and facility needs and to evaluate project proposals. Although the powers of the Commission are advisory in nature, it acts to encourage increased levels of cooperation and efficiency. The Commission has been designated the Metropolitan Clearinghouse under the A-95 Project and Notification Review System by the U. S. Office of Management and Budget. The Technical Advisory Group, composed of State, county and major public authority planners, is actively engaged in planning processes. Coordination activities are being further developed through expanded citizen participation and contact with local elected officials via the Metropolitan Regional Council, Inc. (Section II.3.j.). II-37 Planning at Tri-State is a continuing, comprehensive, coordinated multi-functional process which integrates long-range plans with shorter- range plans, programs and projects. Consistency of plans is furthered through cooperative planning contracts, memoranda of agreement, and through the formalized land use plan cross-acceptance process. In addition, the agency maintains liaison with most of the substate and interstate bodies mentioned in this chapter. II.3.h. Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Commission and Marine Resources Council As noted above, regional planning agencies working for two of the subregions of the New York portion of Tri-State's region are the New York City Planning Commission and the Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Commission. Work of the former has been noted above in the description of local and county-level planning. The latter agency, also known as "Bi-County" is closely tied to the two county planning agencies, in particular Suffolk, with which it shares the same staff director. Nassau-Suffolk is one of the earliest regional planning operations in the State, preparing a two-county comprehensive plan with State and Federal planning assistance during the mid-1960s. From time-to-time, elements of the plan have been detailed and updated and a very signifi- cant outcome of the process has been the formulation of the bi-county Marine Resources Council as an offshoot of the Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Commission. The Council, which serves as a coordinating body for the many public interests in the Long Island marine areas, has been of assistance in the formulation of positions on coastal planning and development matters, such as off-shore energy facilities and water quality with respect to marine fisheries and in encouraging much needed marine resources research. Nassau-Suffolk regional planning staff is 11-38 providing significant input into the State/Federal Coastal Zone Planning Program, and the agency has also been designated to-prepare the two- county areawide wastes treatment management plan under Section 208 of PL 92-500. it is the usual role of multi-jurisdictional planning agencies to act primarily in an advisory capacity. They have no authority to go beyond this, although findings of some of their project review-type functions can often influence decisions by other governments, from Federal to local This certainly is the case with the Tri-State Planning Commission. So, too, with Nassau-Suffolk, but there is the advantage of at least a much greater level of plan concurrence when only two counties are involved. Of course, the New York City subregion is unique in that only one agency, ostensibly, is responsible for overall planning. Nevertheless, there are overwhelming problems between plans and imple- mentation in the City due to size and independence of individual program agencies and, of course, due to severe fiscal constraints. II.3.i. Regional Plan Association Somewhat parallel to, but complimentary with, the work of the Tri- State Regional Planning Commission, is the work of the Regional Plan Association (RPA), a non-profit citizen's planning organization serving much the same New York metropolitan region as Tri-State, the difference being only a bit less coverage in Connecticut. RFA produced a plan for the Connecticut/New Jersey/New York region in 1929, the first of its kind for a major metropolitan area, worldwide. Through a continuing program of public involvement, RPA has had some nctable success through- out the area in influencing development decisions. However, as a private organization, they are dependent on contributary funding and powers of pursuasion, rather than the capacity to take direct governmental action. ~II-39 A "Second Regional Plan" was produced in 1968, offering broad regional guidelines for housing, transportation, open space and public facilities, with some special focus on development of regional centers peripheral to New York City itself. In 1974, RPA co-authored a plan for the mid-Hudson Valley from Putnam and Orange Counties, as far north as Colunbia and Greene, in conjunction with another private regional planning organiza- tion, Mid-Hudson Patterns for Progress. Both these regional plans have some influence upon the more official planning activities of Tri-State, and of the county and local governments affected. Recently, RPA examined the influence and work of Tri-State as the official regional planning agency; this has encouraged Tri-State to try to provide more public contact and open forums in both their planning and program review functions. II.3.j. Metropolitan Regional Council The Metropolitan Regional Council is a non-profit organization which serves as a means of communication between the 600 municipalities in the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut area. It consists of elected local government officials, including the Mayor of New York City and, at annual meetings, three State governors. It has set up MRC-TV which has, as its exclusive purpose, transmission of training and informational programs to local governments in the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut area. Though it spends little of its time on planning, it can serve as a supplemental means of communication, both publicly and intergovern- mentally. Tri-State has use of its facilities for some technical advisory group (staff level) and Commission meetings. II.3.k. Intergovernmental Planning Coordinating Committee The Intergovernmental Planning Coordinating Committee is a special ad hoc committee, established by the Mayor of the City of New York and II-40 the county executives of Nassau and Westchester counties, specifically for the purpose of identifying and resolving three-way problems affecting the three municipalities. The Committee is especially concerned with problems of water supply, sludge disposal, air and noise pollution and energy conservation. Committee members include the planning, health, environmental and public works department heads from the City and two counties. 11.3.1. Other Special Function Regional Agencies Impacting Water Quality Because the metropolitan New York area serves as a very major port facility, the management of its harbor facilities must be considered in water quality planning for the area. Much of this planning is within the jursidictions of the Fort of New York Authority (which is an inter- state agency set up between New Jersey and New York), and/or the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Environmental problems caused by shipping wastes and spillage, dock facility locations and channel deredging all impact upon water quality and marine life. In addition, of course, the manner of operation of the Port of New York Authority airports has impact upon air pollution in the region. Storm runoff from these airport facilities affects water quality, and terminals are fairly large sewage sources. There are several other regional agencies in the Long Island Sound/ Atlantic Ocean Basin with special functional jurisdictions whose plans should be examined with respect to their development impacts, which indirectly relate to water quality management. These include three New York State Park Regions: the Long Island State Park and Recreation Commission, the State Park and Recreation Commission for the City of New York, and the Taconic State Park and Recreation Commission. Also of interest are the transportation planning activities of the New York .11-41 State Metropolitan Transportation Authority which has jurisdiction over mass transportation in the metropolitan area. ii.3.m. Interstate Water Pollution Control Agencies There are special interstate water-related regulatory agencies responsible for planning input in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin. The planning and research activities of the Interstate Sanitation Commission and the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commis- sion are closely related. Each deals primarily with pollution, its abatement, and recovery of the areas that have been damaged by pollution. The Interstate Sanitation Commission covers the New Jersey and Long Island coast between Sandy Hook and Fire Island Inlet, extends north up the Hudson to the Bear Mountain Bridge and includes Long Island Sound as far east as New Haven and Fort Jefferson. It was organized in 1936 and has the power to make rules and regulations and orders regarding the pollution of coastal, estuarine and tidal waters. It also determines the adequacy of treatment afforded by the various sewage treatment works aid makes recommendations for State enforcement of the pollution programs. The balance of Long Island, except for the Atlantic Coast is within the jurisdiction of the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission whose basis, the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Compact, directs that it should cooperate with the signatory states of New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island a-ad Massachusetts in the abatement of existing-pollutidn-4nd the.. control of future pollution in the interstate waters of the New England area. Its area of jurisdiction covers all waters which are contiguous to two or more signatory states, except for those waters under the jurisdiction of the Interstate Sanitation Commission in New York and is Connecticut. rI-42 II.3.n. Corps of Engineers Permits It should be noted that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers also plays a significant role in the management of the quality of the water areas of the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin and prevention of undesirable coastal land alternations through the enforcement of Title 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. In addition, the Corps of Engineers, under Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, is also responsible for the issuance of permits which authorize disposal of dredged material in Ocean waters. Under Section 404, which is a reaffirmation of early authority granted, the Department of the Army, through the Chief of Engineers, may issue permits, after notice and hearing, for disposal of dredged or fill material into navigable waters only at specified sites determined in cooperation with EPA and other Federal and State is ~agencies. Similar procedures and coordinations are accomplished in connection with issuance of permits for disposal of dredged material in Ocean waters. Recent indications are that the Corps intends to extend application of Section 404 to virtually all inland waters of the United States under a broadened interpretation of navigable waters. Around Long Is land and New York City, however, such regulation has been in effect for many years and some 400 permits per year are for filling activity in the numerous bays, sounds and estuaries of the basin. In addition, some fifty permits a year are issued for disposal of dredged material in Ocean waters. 11.3.o. New England River Basins Commission The New England River Basins Commission was created in 1967 by the * ~~President of the United States under authority of Title II of the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965. The purpose of this Commission is to II -43 serve as the principal agency for coordination of water and related land use planning in the region, including Federal, State, interstate, local and non-governmental water planning. The Commission also prepares a comprehensive coordinated joint plan for use and development of water and related land resources. The Commission served as the lead agency in the preparation of the recently completed Long Is land Sound Study. 11.3.p. Delaware River Basin Commission The Delaware River Basin Commission created by compact between New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania, has interest in the management of New York City reservoirs in the Delaware watershed. Their recommend- ations and certain specific water release requirements must be considered in any study involving water planning for New York City, and also for Long Island if upstate import of water is contemplated. II.3.q. Long Island Sound Study The Long Island Sound Study (LISS) is a Level "B" planning effort, generally authorized under the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 (PL 89-80) and initiated in 1971 under the lead of the New England River Basins Commission, with participation by the states of New York and Connecticut and by various Federal agencies. Section 209 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (PL 92-500) directs development; through the U. S. Water Resources Council of Level ??BI plans, for all river basins of the United States by 1980. Such studies are intermediate-term (15-25 years) plans which identify further need for water resource planning. A Level "B" plan includes examination within a major basin of water quality, flood plain management, coastal zone management, and overall land use, among other elements of natural i resources management. A Level "B" study is flexible in scope and detail, 11-44 but its objectives are to identify actions, plans and programs to be carried out at all levels of government, and to recommend more detailed implementation studies for authorization of specific projects and measures. The final Long Island Sound Study was released in September, 1975. Many of its recommendations may be implemented through ongoing programs, and may set precedents for other areas. It is felt that LISS will not only benefit the basin, but the State and nation as well. The study did not cover those parts of Long Island and New York City which drain outside Long Island Sound. Those portions of Westchester and Bronx counties and New York County (Manhattan) adjacent to the Long Island Sound, but not covered by the Long Island Sound Study, will be covered in the Hudson-Mohawk Level "B" study which recently has been started. It will be the first managed by a state, with DEC as the lead agency in cooperation with the Federal Water Resources Council. II.3.r. Northeastern Water SuPPly Study The Northeastern U. S. Water Supply Study (NEWS) is a special Congressionally-authorized study started at the time of severe droughts in the mid-60's. The project includes all of New York State except for the westernmost basins. The NEWS study has focused on the major water supply problem areas of the northeast, including those of the three- state region around New York City. It evaluates probable water supply strains anticipated by the year 1980. The study examines such matters as water supply sources and their quality, engineering, preliminary environmental impact and institutional alternatives. In the New York metropolitan area, basins outside those draining directly into the area are also involved because of interbasin transfer of water supplies. 11-45 For example, potentials for expansion of the New York City water supply in the Catskills and other upstate areas can have considerable impact outside of the immediate New York metropolitan area, in terms of, say, reservoir construction. Conversely, decisions on upstate land uses affecting New York City water supply have impact within those portions of the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean BasiA which are dependent on such supplies. A next step in the NEWS study in the New York metropolitan area will be to examine several specific water supply alternatives suggested in the preliminary study. Several of these involve a process referred to as "flood skimming" or taking of excess Hudson River flow and storing for use in dryer perids. 11.3.s. Commission on Water Supplv Needs of Southeastern New York Completing its work in the spring of 1975, the Temporary State Commission on the Water Supply Needs of Southeastern New York made a study involving much the same aspects as did NEWS, but confined essen- tially to downstate New York. Similar conclusions are drawn with respect to water supply needs and potentials in the New York City metropolitan area, but more detailed examination and recommendations are made in the Southeastern New York Water Supply Study, especially with respect to institutional arrangements and non-structural water conservation measures. Both studies concur that sources of supply of water in the region are at critical levels, that is, near amounts below which, in dry years, they would be inadequate to meet demands. The quality of possible alternate sources is inadequate, and planning for new sources and supply systems has been delayed too long. However, recommendations are being made, including legislation, which would provide first for improved system management, including water conserva- tion measures such as metering, and for ultimate expansion of the system, ii-46 probably to upper Hudson tributaries, if and when necessary. Future facilities alter-natives are being studied for impact. Obviously, areas outside the Long Is land Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin will be most impacted by such facility development. 11.3.t. Groundwater Studies on Long Island The problems of groundwater supplies on Long Island, especially in Nassau and Suffolk counties, have received particular attention. In recent years, a large part of the investigatory work has been done through cooperative programs of the U. S. Geological Survey, Nassau DPW, Suffolk DEC, the Suffolk County Water Authority, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and the county health departments. The studies point out that drawdown of the underlying freshwater aquifers of Long Island through over use may result in saltwater intrusion. In addition, failure to recharge wastewater and losses through stormwater runoff in developed areas is resulting in further decline of supplies. In certain areas recharge from exfiltrating sewers and septic tanks,and shimilar individual waste treament facilities, has caused notable decline in groundwater quality. Use of low phosphate, biodegradable detergents has helped to alleviate some of the problem. Because of the integral relationship between water supply and waste water disposal on Long Isla-ad, water supply planning recommendations for Nassau and Suffolk are very important considerations in waste water management for this basin. In Kings and Queens counties a contrary condition exists. Pumping has decreased and water tables have risen to cause flooding of cellars. Sewers are taxed by increased infiltration and by the demand for discharge of sump pump waters. ii-47, II.3.u. North Atlantic Regional Water Resources Study The North Atlantic Regional Water Resources Study (NAR) is the broadest-based of the various levels of water resources studies done '0 under guidelines set by the Federal Water Resources Council. Started in 1965, primarily under the direction of the U. S. Corps of Engineers, substantial input was also provided by other State and Federal agencies and existing river basin commissions. The NAR study was completed in 1972 and serves as the basis for follow-up Level "B" studies in all the North Atlantic River Basins. II.3.v. Coastal Zone Planning The New York State Department of State is the lead State agency to carry out the coastal zone management planning program in New York State under the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The objective of the program is to develop an implementable State Coastal Zone Management Program for the effective management, beneficial use, protection and development of the coastal zone. Substantial technical support is provided to the work by DEC. Under the coastal zone program, the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin is included in shoreline studies being done by planning departments of various counties and regions. Specifically, the Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning staff has work underway for their two counties. New York City has contracted for similar work. Westchester County is expected to work on such studies, both on Long Island Sound and the Hudson in the next year of the program. Such studies are aimed at the restoration, protection and preserva- tion of the tidal waters; the beaches, bluffs, wetlands and other fish and wildlife habitats; and the identification of policies and regulations to carry out such protection. A second phase of the program will involve i commitment to implementation of various aspects of the plan. ii-48 II.3.w. Air Quality Planning In response to Federal requirements under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act of 1970, air quality maintenance planning areas have been identi- fied throughout the State where national air quality standards may be exceeded because of expected growth and development between 1975 and 1985. New York City, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester and Rockland counties comprise one such air quality maintenance area. The New York metropolitan area has one of the most severe air quality problems in the country, but it is expected that exercise of certain stationary source and transporta- tion controls will improve air quality and prevent further deterioration. A Transportation Control Plan has been worked out jointly by New York City, the Federal EPA and DEC to help the City area reach and maintain national air standards by 1979. The plan provides for such strategies as staggered working hours in lower Manhattan, express bus lanes, vehicle inspection, fitting trucks and buses with additional emission control equipment, and stricter enforcement of City traffic regulations. Over the longer range, air quality maintenance plans may be necessary through much of the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin, and more stringent land use controls in dense-population areas may be needed. Such constraints on land use must also be reconciled with land use decisions related to the maintenance of water quality standards throughout the basin. Much basic input for air quality maintenance planning, in the form of population projections and transportation data is provided by Tri-State Planning Commission staff. II.3.x. Solid WastesManagement Planning Comprehensive solid wastesmanagement studies, 100 percent State funded, are being conducted by consultants on behalf of county and regional agencies. In addition, some counties have utilized Federal II-49 funds under Section 207 of the Solid Wastes Disposal Act of 1965 to undertake similar studies without State aid. Nearly 50 counties, covering 95 percent of the State's population, have been studied or have such studies in progress. Their purpose is to identify major alternative solutions to solid wastes management problems which are intermunicipal in nature. This includes the identification of the most economic and environmentally sound systems of collection and disposal. Some of the completed studies include examination, of resources recovery (RR) as an alternative. In New York City a RR potential report is in final review and in Westchester County a RR study has been completed. Both studies were state funded. Westchester County has proceded to develop RR projects. Early solid wastes manageraent studies were made for both Nassau and Suffolk counties, but these did not include analysis of resource recovery potentials. II.3.v. Agricultural Land Preservation Since 1972, New York State counties have had the opportunity to establish Agricultural Districts in an effort to encourage the preser- vation of viable agricultural land and farmsteads. While such districts must be certified by the State as to their consistency with State plans and resource conservation efforts, the basic initiation of such districting is up to the individual landowners. Since one of the mechanisms within an Agricultural District to minimize development and continue farming activity has been to make it economically difficult to establish or extend public sewer and water facilities in the district, Agricultural Districts should be recognized as limiting factors in water quality management planning and especially in 303(e) basin plans and 208 areawide plans. As of now, there are no certified Agricultural Districts in existence within the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin due, in part, to high II-50 urban density. Nevertheless, Suffolk County remains one of the highest dollar value agricultural production counties in the State. The county is engaged in an Agricultural Land Acquisition Program, designed to preserve some of its prime agricultural land from mounting economic pressures caused by urban land development. In an area where land values even for agricultural property are exceedingly high, it was felt that agricultural districting would not work as a preservation device in and of itself. There was concern voiced that the approximately 45,000 remaining productive acres of agricultural land in Suffolk County would go the way of the other 123,000 acres that existed in 1950. Thus, county acquisition of development rights on some of the remaining agri- cultural land was proposed. Most of this land is located at the eastern end of Long Island, away from the population centers. The program would allow the farmer to stay in production by purchasing 80 percent of the full fee value, thus reducing taxes and supplying additional income for farm improvements. The county then possesses the option to decide whether developers may later purchase the land. The importance of keeping the area agricultural is stressed because the area is vital to the fresh food needs of the entire New York metropolitan area. Prices are kept from rising at greater than present rates because of the close proximity of these food sources. It has been suggested that the Agricul- tural Districts Program may be applied to those areas where development rights have been acquired to further insure their preservation. II.3.z. Soil and Water Conservation Planning Suffolk and Westchester counties are the only counties in the basin with established Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Nassau County is soon to become a district, and the city of New York is considering establishing such districts in each of its boroughs (counties). Soil III-5-1 and Water Conservation Districts are responsible for the control of erosion and prevention of floodwater and sediment damages, both through the application of land management plans to individual rural land holdings and through support of small watershed maanagement programs, often involving some structural protection. A recent law passed by the New York State Legislature had made the development of individual soil and water conservation plans mandatory by 1980 for productive land holdings of over 25 acres. In addition, reclamation plans for proposed mining activity are also required under a law passed in 1974. Both such land management plans will be undertaken with assistance of County Soil and Water Conservation Districts. II.3.aa. Small Watershed Plans The Small Watershed Planning Program under PL 83-566, administered by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with local governments and the State Department of Environmental Conservation, is intended to develop and improve the management of land and water resources in small watersheds (less than 250,000 acres) through projects and actions planned and carried out jointly by all levels of government, with the full understanding and support of a majority of private land- owners and farm operators involved. Assistance is authorized primarily for flood provention and erosion control, with supplemental benefits available for fish and wildlife, agricultural water management, recre- ation, forestry and water supply purposes. The planning phase includes preparation of watershed work plans, after which specific detailed project plans are prepared for implementation. There are no completed small watershed projects in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin. Blind Brook near Rye and Port Chester in Westchester County has been i approved for a planning study. II-52 II.3.ab. Shore Erosion Control Shore erosion control and protection from hurricane flooding are available in the basin through a combination of cooperative Federal, State and local programs applicable to the Atlentic shoreline, including lower New York Bay and to the north shore of Long Island. Over 100 State-local government shore protection projects have been built since 1946, totalling over $27,000,000. Federal involvement, primarily through the U. S. Corps of Engineers, in beach erosion control and hurricane protection in the last 15 years has reduced the State-local program to projects in limited areas not covered under the Federal program or to interim protection works pending completion of a Federal study. The Federal-State-local projects are usually much larger in scope and may cost from 20-150 million dollars. Hurricane protection projects may require construction of artificial barriers across intlets, which may impact on water quality within the enclosed embayments. II.3.ac. Flood Plain, Wetland and Special River Management and Protection Several other resource management activities involving cooperative State and local planning should be mentioned because of their direct impact on water quality management or upon land uses which, in turn, affect the needs for and/or quality of the water in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin. Perhaps the most significant iE these is the flood plain management/flood insurance program, wherein local commun- ities, in order to establish eligibility of developed property for Federal flood insurance, must come up with systems for control or flood-proofing of development in all flood hazard areas. Flood hazard areas include those subject to coastal flooding. Lack of flood insurance can severely limit the availability of development financing and mortgage money. Most of the communities in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin 11-53 are involved. Modification or adoption of zoning or building regulations regarding flood hazard areas is the usual means of compliance. A recently initiated State-local program preserves legislatively- designated stretches of Wold, Scenic and Recreational Rivers through environmentally sound land management and limitations on types of development. In Suffolk County, a nine-mile stretch of the Carmans River has been intermittently classified "Scenic" and "Recreational", and a five-mile stretch of the Connetquot River, mostly adjoining publicly held land, has been classified "Recreational". Two other segments of the Connetquot and a portion of the Carmans River have been statutorily specified for study with respect to possible further designation. Another similar program has been recently legislated for designation of freshwater wetlands. An inventory to identify such areas is underway Statewide. Far more important in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin is the Tidal Wetlands Program established in 1973, which covers all of the coastline of the basin. Activities affecting a wetland in or within 300 feet of its boundary may be regulated by DEC. While these several flood and wetland area controls are somewhat piecemeal, they collectively provide considerable guidance for develop- ment in the vicinity of critical environmental areas throughout the basin, and consequently impact upon water quality management plans. II.3.ad. County and Local Environmental Conservation Commissions A program supported by DEC which provides substantial citizen planning input into the "303(e)" basin planning either directly or through influence upon the planning effort of the other agencies is the work of local Conservation Advisory Commissions and county Environ- mental Management Councils. At local levels, such bodies identify and IT-54 prepare open space plans f or their communities and identify critical areas of concern. Such plans and studies become part of local comprehensive development plans. County Environmental Management Councils prepare overall county environmental management plans which, among other matters, must include recommendations on water resources and water quality management. The operations of the Westchester County Environmental Management Council are also particularly noteworthy because of the Council's organ- ization and responsibilities. The Council is unique in that it is made up of two parts: the County Environmental Coordinating Agency (CECA) which is an interdepartmental county review and policy board whose constituent agencies provide staff support, a-ad the County Environmental Advisory Council made up of appointed representatives from the various Westchester municipalities. The CECA technical members are the heads of the county departments of 'Health, Planning, Public Works, Environmental Facilities, and Parks, Recreation and Conservation. They are supplemented by the District Conservationist of the U. S. Soil Conservation Service, the County Agricultural Extension Agent, the citizen members of the county Soil and Water Conservation District, a representative from the county Parks Board and the Chairman of the county Environmental Advisory Council. The Westchester CECA is the designated 208 agency responsible for the production of that county's Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan.' It is felt that through the combined influences of CECA axid the Advisory Council there will be excellent representation of both citizen and agency interests in the development of water quality management and other environmental plan elements in Westchester County. Overall standards and criteria for water, land and air resource management programs may be developed by the State, but county and regional planning agencies represent the only realistic way in which IT-55 sufficient manpower can provide support for solutions at local levels. The Department of Environmental Conservation will continue its policy of close association with such agencies as part of its increasing effort toward local government and general public involvement in all its resource management programs. 11.4. 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management II.4.a. Authority and Regulations Governing 208 Planning On October 18, 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500, became effective. Section 208 of this Act authorized a 100 percent Federally funded areawide waste treatment management program for qualified areas of states. Initial rules and regulations issued by EPA on September 14, 1973, stated that to qualify, areas must be of an urban-industrial nature, and have complex water quality problems. Under the regulations, the Governor had three specific choices of action: he could designate areas and agencies; remain silent; or non- designate specific areas. If the Governor remained silent, the chief elected officials of general purpose local governments could make desig- nations on their own and request approval from EPA. The regulations did not allow the states to obtain any direct funding from EPA for state 208 planning activities. The regulations required that the Governor execute his options within 180 days from September 14, 1973. Within the 180 days, the areas and agencies in the state that might have been eligible for the Governor's designation had not sufficiently met the Federal criteria necessary to have a Governor's designation approved by EPA. Therefore, on March 14, 1974, the Governor of New York State sent a letter to the EPA Administator II-56 that non-designated the entire state. The Governor noted that his non- designation would not preclude future designations. Subsequent to the Governor's March 14, 1974 non-designation, EPA published rules and regulations (Title 40 - Chapter 35) on May 13, 1974, which described the 208 grant procedure and plan content requirements and, most significantly, by the fall of 1974, EPA announced that $150 million was available for 208 grants. Subsequently, State DEC personnel assisted representatives of areas and agencies in the preparation of acceptable designation materials. By June 30, 1975, the final date under the law (PL 92-500, Section 208), whereby designated agencies could receive 100 percent Federal funding, the Governor had designated seven areas and agencies. Six of the agencies received grants. In the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin, the following grants were made: 1. Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board -- Nassau and Suffolk Counties. 2. New York City Environmental Protection Administration - New York City 3. Westchester County -- Westchester County. Therefore, all of the counties in New York State which are in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin will be developing areawide waste treatment management plans under Section 208. On November 28, 1975, EPA issued new rules and regulations (Title 40 - Parts 35, 130 and 131) which give further detail on the preparation of Water Quality Management Plans. These regulations require that Section 208 planning must be done on a Statewide basis by either the State or areawide planning agency pursuant to 40 CFR, Part 130. Hence, the sub- stantive planning requirements were deleted from the 208 grant regulations and incorporated in "Policies and Procedures for Continuing Planning Process" (40 CFR, Part 130) and "Preparation of Water Quality Management Plans" (40 CFR, Part 131). -II-57 II.4.b. Purpose and Responsibilities for Section 208 Planning The objective of the Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plans developed under Section 208 is to develop plans, strategies and waste treatment management organizations needed to meet the 1983 national goal of swimmable/fishable waters. The areawide planning process allows local areas, under the auspices of a local planning agency to develop, implement and manage solutions to its water pollution control problems. At a minimum, the 208 planning process will: a) Identify all anticipated municipal and industrial treatment work over at least a 20-year period. b) Identify urban runoff and combined sewer overflow treatment needs, as well as non-point sources of pollution and feasible control methods. c) Develop alternative systems which incorporate all technical and institutional contraints. d) Recommend the most cost effective alternative establishing construction priorities and a timetable. e) Identify land use requirements where necessary to meet water quality standards. f) Establish a regulatory program and select a management agency or agencies to implement the plan. g) Insure public participation during all phases of development. h) Provide for annual updating and certification. New York State is responsible for 208 planning on a Statewide basis. In the designated areas, the designated agency is responsible for the development of the 208 plan. 11-58 II.4.c. 208 Studies Underway in Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin Figure 2 is a map of the designated 208 study areas in New York State. The 208 studies in Westchester County, New York City and Nassau- Suffolk counties are in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin. The following Table lists the designated 208 programs in the Long Island Sound/Atlantic Ocean Basin: TABLE 12 Designated Designated Grant Completion Area Agency Study Cost Approved Date New York City New York City $ 8,111,533 6/23/75 3/31/78 EPA Nassau & Suffolk Nassau-Suffolk 5,207,000 6/9/75 12/31/77 Counties Regional Planning Board Westchester County Westchester Co. 1,080,000 6/18/75 3/31/78 $14,398,533 II.4.d. Relationship of 208 Planning with Other Programs II.f.d.l. Relationship Between Section 208 and Section 303(e) Basin Plans 303(e) basin plans constitute the overall framework within which 208 plans are developed for specific portions of a basin with complex pollution control problems. Basin pans: 1) identify point source discharges and existing abatement plans; 2) provide water quality standards and goals; 3) define critical water quality conditions; and 4) within the limits of available information, provide waste load constraints. The results of 208 planning will constitute an ingegral part of these basin plans. The 208 plans and basin plans must be mutually consistent, and should be annually certified as so by the Governor. II-59 NEW YORK STATE DESIGNJATED A A E M1iIMED UNDER SEMA4~~U OG L92-500 d CENTRAL NEW YORK REGIONAL PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT BOARD ESTCHESTER COUNT1Y ERIE-NIAGARA REGIONAL SOUTHERN TIER CENTRALPLNGBOR PLANNING BOARDREINLPAIGBOD NEW YORRIYEAFGR 11.4.d.2. Relationship Between 208 and-201 Facilities Plans Facility planning consists of plans and studies prerequisite to the award of an assistance grant for detailed design or construction of public sewerage facilities. Upon completion and approval of a water quality management plan, new 201 grants will be made to the designated 208 management agency. A program Guidance Memorandum (SAM~-1) issued by US EPA is presented in the Appendix. This memorandum delineates in detail the relationship between 208 and 201 plans for grant awards during all phases of 208 planning. 11.4.d.3. Relationship Between 208 and 209 Water Resource Plans Section 209 authorizes the preparation of Level "B" plans for all basins in the United States. These plans are to analyze water related land resources management problems and serve as a basis for recommenda- tion to Congress of priorities for investigation, planning and construc- tion of projects. The Long Island Sound Study included development of a Level 1'B" plan for the Long Island Sound portion of the planning area. NYS DEC has been authorized to conduct a Level "B" study of the adjoining Hudson River Basin. The New York City, Westchester County and Nassau-Suffolk 208 studies will be coordinated with these Level "B" plans. II.4.d.4. Relationship Between Section 208 Plans and Section 402 Permit Program The 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Frog-cam is designed to ensure that pollutant dischargers will not exceed prescribed levels. The permit system provides an essential tool for implementation of the 208 plans within the framework of the 303(e) basin plans. No permits may be issued for point sources which are in conflict with approved 208 plans since they automatically become part of the over- 1.1-61 all 303(e) basin plans. The 208 planning agency should assess current permit requirements and, when -needed to achieve the 1983 goals, recom- mend appropriate conditions for future permit issuance, 11.4.d.5. Relationship Between 208 and Air Quality Programs Sections 107, 108, 109 and 110 of the Clean Air Act provide for the establishment of ambient air quality standards, the partitioning of the nation into Air Quality Control Regions, and the preparation of implementation plans to show how the attainment and maintenance of the standards in each region will be accomposhed. To simplify planning for the maintenance of standards, many Air Quality Control Regions are also partitioned into Air Quality Maintenance Areas pursuant to 40 CFR 51.12(f). States are responsible through State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the attainment and maintenance of the air quality standards. During the 208 planning process, planners will acquire a general familiarity with the requirements of the applicable SIP in the Air Quality Region(s) in which the 208 area is located. If any portion of a 208 area is located within an Air Quality Maintenance Area, planners -will coordinate their activities with the Air Quality Maintenance Area plan development and implementation process. This coordination will include: 1. Use of a consistent data base, especially growth projections; 2. Promotion of complementary air and water quality management strategies; 3. Assessment of 208 plan implementation on air quality, especially the primary and secondary effects of sewage treatment facilities; 4. Review by the appropriate agency(s) to ensure that 208 plans are consistent with applicable portions of the State Implementation Plans. It would be advisable to arrange periodic reviews rather than relying on a single review at the end of the planning process. II-62 Planners will also review the applicable State procedures for implementing and encorcing Section III (Standards of Performance or New Stationary Sources) and Section 112 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) of the Clean Air Act to ensure compatibility with 208 planning. These standards may be important because of their impact on decisions, for example, concerning sludge incineration a-ad the location of facilities generating air pollutants. 11.4.d.6. Relationship Between 208 and Solid Waste Programs Section 208(b) calls for regulatory programs over all dischargers as well as processes to control disposition of residual waste and disposal of pollutants on land or in subsurface excavations. Thus, with regard to water quality impact, solid waste and sludge disposal regulation is needed in a 208 program. Further information on regulatory programs and information on sludge utilization or disposal are contained in Chapters 5 and 7 of the EPA "Guidelines for Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning". In developing programs for dealing with water pollution from solid waste a-ad residual disposal, State- plans for solid waste management will be examined for recommended organizational and technological solutions pertaining to the 208 area. Local agencies having primary responsibility for regulating and implementing solid waste management controls will be identified. The effects of the control program will be considered and appropriate mesures taken in cooperation with local agencies to ensure compatibility between the water quality management provisions of 208 planning and solid waste management within the area. 11I.4.M. Relationship Between 208 and Other Areawide Managment programs The land use aspects of 208 planning provide a direct linkage with other areawide planning efforts within the area, including those supported under the HUD 701, water and sewer, and flood insurance and disaster programs, DOT transportation plans and NOAA coastal zone management plans. 208 planning is viewed as providing the water quality component of the comprehensive plan for the area. Other area planning activities will be considered to ensure that their impact on water quality is incorporated into the 208 planning process and that 208 plans are consistent with these activities. This will facilitate the development of a coordinative relationship between 208 agencies and related agencies which will be carried over into the 208 implementation phase. Special attention wil be given to related plans which are being developed concurrently with the 208 plan. It is likely, for example, that many areas will be preparing land use elements under the HUD 701 program and/or coastal zone management plans. These types of plans will be of particular importance since they will be examining issues related to development, land use and water quality. The 208 planning agency will establish procedures to ensure that such plans are consistent with the 208 plan. 11.4.e. Nassau-Suffolk 208 Program The Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board is the agency designated to develop the 208 plan for Nassau and Suffolk counties. Major surface and groundwater pollution problems have been identi- fied on Long Is land. In the marine waters, the problems include nutrient enrichment and the closing of beaches and shellfishing areas due to bacterial contamination. These are attributed to both point and non-0 point sources of-pollution. Some freshwater streams have dried up and II-64 others are threatened because of lowered groundwater levels due to sewering with surface water disposal and excessive well pumpage. Groundwater quality has been degraded by nitrates, chlorides and other contaminants from cesspools, fertilizers, recharge of wastewater, landfill leachate and stormwater recharge. Groundwater is the only source of water supply in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. NSRPB has developed an extensive work program including the develop- ment of mathematical models of Long Island's surface and groundwater to permit determination of: -- the probable response of ground and surface waters to specific stress situations resulting from various groundwater-waste water management alternatives. -- the permissable volume and quality of effluent that can be discharged into marine and surface waters without causing adverse environmental impacts. -- the impacts of various groundwater levels on salt water intrusion and further pollution of the groundwater resources. Surface water quality models to predict DO, coliform, etc. will be developed for the following water bodies: 1. Great South Bay complex, including South Oyster Bay, Hempstead Bay and Middle Bay 2. Manhasset Bay 3. Hempstead Harbor 4. Oyster Bay complex 5. Huntington Bay complex 6. Port Jefferson Harbor 7. Caril's River 8. Peconic Estuary and Flanders Bay 9. Peconic River II-65 These models can then be used to evaluate management alternatives and develop quantitative estimates of effects of proposed management alter-natives. An existing analog model of the groundwater system of Long Island Counties will be used to identify hydrologic conditions resulting from various water and waste water management alternatives. In addition, a two dimensional salt water interface model of the South Fork will be employed to determine the impact of various technical water and waste water management alternatives. An evaluation of existing surface and groundwater data will be made and an assessment of the existing water quality presented. Sampling of major streams during the storm events will be conducted to obtain data on the impact of urban runoff. In addition, small specific drainage areas will be selected for in-depth study of the urban runoff problems. A program will be initiated to identify the nature and extent of rural runoff problems. Current matm.gement practices will be evaluated and structural or non-structural solutions recommended. The 208 study will develop and evaluate a series of alternatives, including the no-action alternative. These alternatives will include both structural and no-n-structural solutions to the water quality problems. The environmental, social and economic impact of the various alternatives will be evaluated. Based on a comparison of these altern- atives, a final plan will be selected. II.4.f. New York City 208 Program New York City EPA is responsible for developing the 208 plan for New York City. i ii-66 The existing water quality problems arise from several general source classifications, including municipal plant effluents, untreated discharges of dry weather sewage, combined sewer overflows, stormwater runoff, direct industrial discharges, overflows from poorly operating septic tanks and cesspools, and possibly leachates from sanitary and industrial landfills. One major effort of the New York City 208 program will be to develop means of rationally evaluating the effects of these source types, singley and in combination, on specific water quality problems in the harbor. This will involve the development of dynamic two dimensional simulation models which take into accountthe complex flow patterns which interact to transport pollutants in parts of the harbor. Presently available basic relationships and mathematical models will be exhanced and verified to depict water quality interrelationships in the study area and will be used in the 208 planning process to deter- mine the most beneficial and cost-effective waste water management strategies. These will include: -- Overall steady state harbor model to give background water quality characteristics (DO, coliforms, phosphorus, etc.) which are chiefly determined by continuous point source discharges (municipal waste water treatment effluents) and untreated dry weather flow and industrial discharges (most New Jersey). This will be a further adapted and validated version of the Interstate Sanitation Commission model and will permit evaluation of continuous point source loads. -- Intertidal time variable, advective-dispersive model for the harbor complex to permit superposition of intermittent discharges on the steady Xtate situation to determine short-term coliform variation. This will depict general areas of the harbor following storm events or waste spillages. 11-67 -- A rainfall-runoff model is being developed for drainage areas of New York City and adjacent areas of New Jersey. This model will simulate storm events and, based on the effects of current and future land uses, predict0 the quantity-quality of storm and combined sewer discharges. These models will provide input to both the intertidal harborwide model. Structural and non-structural abatement alternatives and combinations of the two will be produced and evaluated for cost-effectiveness and recommendations will he made. Groundwater use will be determined, along with its quality and quantity. Adequacy of the supply will be evaluated for current and future needs. Policie~s, classifications and future disposition of supplies will be reviewed, with emphasis on Queens and Richmond supplies. Non-point sources, such as overflows from areas served by failing septic tanks and leachate from oil handling areas are considered to be localized public health problems in the New York City area. These sources will be monitored and their impact and importance evaluated. Combined sewer overflows are of major importance in this area. Extensive sampling and monitoring of flows will be performed to assure that their full impact is assessed. Using these data and land use information, rainfall-runoff models will be produced that will be used to estimate the combined sewer overflow load throughout the area, and to project future loadings for various population and land use conditions. Coupled with the water quality models, they will be a valuable tool in the assessment of impacts of overflows on specific areas, and the evalu- ation of abatement alternatives, as well as possibly aiding in the design of combined sewer overflow control systems. 11-68 A vital output of the study will be recommendations for a legal- institutional-financial framework that will provide for the implementa- tion of recommended remedial measures. 11.4.g. Westchester County 208 Program The Westchester County government, through a Water Quality Planning Task Force, is the agency responsible for preparing an Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the County. Westchester is a County of varied conditions and requirements. The northern portion of the County is primarily rural. While pressure for development is high, much of the area drains into the New York City water supply system (the Croton and. Ken sico Basins), thus restricting development. -The area itself relies on groundwater for its source of water supply, while its wastes are consigned to a number of small tertiary treatment plants and individual septic systems. These pose a threat to the groundwater supply, and the quality of Croton Reservoir water has been deteriorating in spite of existing controls. The southern portion of the County contains most of the County's population, including the cities of Yonkers, New Rochelle and White Plains. This area obtains most of its drinking water froma New York City. It is almost completely sewered, and treatment levels are generally being upgraded to secondary. However, present treatment plants become overloaded during heavy storms, and urban runoff is suspected to be a significant contributor to pollutant loadings, particularly into Long Island Sound. Occasionally, some Long Island Sound beaches have been closed due to high bacterial counts after heavy rainstorms. II-69 Existing water quality information indicated that the County's goals are not currently being met and that much more quantitative information is needed on existing stream conditions before planning can proceed. Westchester's work program, therefore, includes extensive stream survey work in the Croton, Hudson River, Bronx River and Long Island Sound Basins. An initial evaluation will be made based on existing water quality data and flow data, with some additional stream flow measurements where necessary. Analysis of non-point and inter- mittent point sour-es will be included. These surveys will serve as inputs for the development of a plan for sewerage facilities in the County. In response to the concern for groundwater in the northern part of the County, a study will be conducted to identify potential ground- water/surface water quality relationships and the extent to which the aquifers can be utilized for subsurface waste disposal without polluting them. Outp~uts will include regulations limiting the types of quantities of pollutants discharged to groundwater aquifers, establishment of maximbm safe yield guidelines, and establishment of maximum development densities compatible with the natural environment. 11-70 Another major element of the Westchester County 208 study is the identification of present landfill conditions, leachate generating and migration characteristics, and alternative methods for arresting leachate migration into surface and subsurface receiving waters. 11-71 III. Hydrologic Profile The Atlantic Ocean - Long Island Sound Planning Area comprises (with the exception of the Hudson River drainage basin) all of the marine waters of New York State and all of the land that drains into these waters. The area includes all of Long island, all of Staten island, the eastern half of Manhlattan island, most of the Bronx and the Southeastern section of Westchester. The roughly 2,000 square mile planning area comprises 500 square miles of water and 1500 square miles of land. III. 1. Stream Gaging Network Freshwater streams and ponds are numerous within the planning area, bu~t even the largest of these is small in comparison to the vast marine waters and the important groundwater. Streams are fed by groundwater in dry weather and receive increased flow for short duration during wet weather periods. Table 13 is a summary of stream gaging information and Figure 3 shows the locations of * ~these 21 active gaging stations. Stream gaging data has also been collecte d -for more than 70 partial record stations. II.2. Tide and Tidal Curre~nt Gaging Stations Tides are gaged at five reference stations: Willets Point, the Battery, Bridgeport, New London and Sandy Hook. About 200 subo~rdinate stations exist within the planning area. Tidal currents are gaged at three reference stations; the Race, the Narrows and Hell Gate. There are around 250 subordinate tidal current stations within the planning area. Tables in Appendices B and C are summaries of tide and tidal current data. Figure 4 shows spring tidal current charts for New York Bays and Figure 55 shows charts for Long island Sound. Tides are caused by the moon and sun. Wind, ocean storms, runoff, and droughts also affect tides. The tabulated data are for average conditions. Daily values vary significantly from the average because of moon phase, season, and weather. -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uf - m MARNEC WESTCHESTER 0 -A RZVER~~~~ GLE - COVE SWAMP 025 NC. 6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~NESSEQUOGUE BRONX ~~~~~RIVER I~~~~~~T~~~Th~~~~~ON 3020~~~~~ANN j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~RIVERj N E- B~RONX s35 JE1RSEY OUEE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ GGNGSTAIN STATEN CEKATLANTIC OCEAN - L.I. SOUND CURLTIU PLANNING AREA (17) I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~EK1 0 10 FIGURE vi. 12/75 TABLE 13 STREAM GAGING STATIONS CGglng Name of DA Number Average Minimum Minimum Streae t Stre-am asq.mi. Of Years Plow-cfs flow-cfs Dsily Dischsrge I. N;ew York Bays - Arthur Kill-Kill Van Xull II. Jamaica Day 1-3115 Valley Stream 4 21 2.95 0.0 0.0 iii. Ilopl'tenjd Cay to Great South Bay 1-3110 Pines Br. Outlet :10 38 4.12 0.0 0.0 1-3105 East Meadow Dr. 31 3i 14.9 0.0 1-3110) h I~ollnore Cr. 17 38 10.5 --- 1.1 1-30)5 Mossapequa Cr. 38 38 11.3 0.95 1-3085 Carlis R. 35 31 26,0 0.05 4.5 1-308.) Sampnnans Cr. 23 31 9.53 1.6 1-3075 5 30 6.29 0.9 renataquit Cr. 1-3065 Connetquot R. 24 32 37.8 --- 16.0 l-30)L0 Patchogue R. 14 26 20.4 --- 2.1 1-3055 Swan R. 9 29 12.4 0.06 4.3 1-3050 Carmans R. 71 33 23,0 2.8 6.2 IV. Peconic River to block Island Sound Wll i5 Peconic N. * 75 3 3 34.9 1.4 3,7 V. East River-lfarlem River 1-302(1 Bronx R. 26.5 31 40.2 1'.0 VI. Lfe'tnrn tong Island 1-300( Blind BeL 9.20 31 15.2 0.12 31 6.31 0.0 1-3010 M a maroneck R. 23.4 29 32.7 0.06 0.10 1-_015 Ilutchinaon it. 5.76 31 6. 7 0.01 0.02 1-31)25 Clen Cove Cr. 11 37 6.43 2.1 W 1. G-,I r. I -i:-S 1-1.1 Long I.-iand Sound 1-3030 Mill Neck Cr. 12 38 9.05 0.09 1-3035 Cold Spring Dr. 7.3 25 2.41 0.20 1-3040 Miasequogue R. 27 32 40.7 16.00 19.00 SOURCE: U.S. Geological Survey latei Data Report NY-75-1 Figure 11 Tidal Current Chartsi, New York Harbor (Spring Tides-Knots) rTGURE 14a PCR ~ HIGH WATER IHuAfter NEW YORK Hig Wae - \-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' 8 --'-.*~~~~~~': ~~~~~~~~--.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2 ~~~~~~~~~K~~~~~~ T 12 ~~~~~~~~AV~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~: /z 1.0' / .' &~~~~~~~~~~-* A C) -~~~~~~~~~ Ia'..~~~~Q 'F __ 07 , ~~~~~.SI Figure 4 (cont'd) Tidal Current Charts, New York Harbor (Spring Tides-Knots) Figure 4Ic p 'l j Figure 4-d 2 Hours After 3 Hours After High Water -High Water . . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~9,~~~~p~~~i~~~;:~7 ''"' I _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I 0.5 -, . _ _ _ 0 3 /a . i'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L -AEaA ANj~r~& i~~r(~e.~ \ lo,! ~a"', \i>N / ~~~h-~~Prv K16 If" g~ 6"' ��-�\: --'a. . ~ t~~o -- '- -Is '. 49- Figure 4 (cont'd) Tidal Current Charts, New York Harbor (Spring Tides-Knots) Figure 4-e Figure 4-f 4 Hours After 5 Hours After High Water High Water /1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0-I -~~~~~t~~W~~P-~~ ~~.rn -~~~~~ 1 - q 28LI41 05 046e- J&25A.~ ~ ~ ~ -, 'I*~? ..zC- e~ 4 ELor . ELGT 2.11 --*-~~~~ 17 '~ Y ~~ (4 " - ~ `' __" 1 1 i:** A~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~i~ Z � M~~~~ 13 *C=4 .> .I.27 jb-. 'Ki~2 /.~TS 1LLO r~.~~'"~l 04 ~ru I~C \~~ ~P. ~~ - 03 -:: 'F : \K5~"/ ,x~V\ ,>: N - �29,I ; 9 :ic ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j~ I ,4-'- Ni ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\ u�4.~:i~~ i! ,h.~~~~~~~~ -QZ '. .~� Figure 4 (contTd) Tidal Current Charts, New York Harbor (Spring Tides-Knots) Figure 4- g 4-h Low Water " Ykr Fgur New York .-i-iij bI 1 Hour After Low Water 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2. ~~~ /`i:~ a9> aI'aa3aQn- ~z~.hia C '-.' / i5. ( Iv lgvq" 117 -i ~-o~":xzi ~,1 r.r I2/~~~~-- as.,. slck IIa-X L Oj , r"" Et~~~: 06A r O : �::j . z - . ~ .* ,, ~ * .'al i I~~~~~~~~::: ______zO F ~ ~~ 6L - ti- rr-lSi~ S~~~~ac~~~~~~..I o /a --I C i~~TL~~~:~j,~~~�i'4.^~~~~~"''�~ *4I* *A?""-~":~~~~�i�~" .c~ ~~;:~ Figure 4 (cont'd) Tidal Current Charts, New York Harbor (Spring Tides-Knots) ~~~~~~~Fgr II- Figure 4-1 Figure 4 ALHorsAferr 3 Hours After k Hours After Low Water Low Water 06~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. ... .... 8~ ~ ~~~~~~1 c~, ~ 2 / " 1211 .A6I - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~7-a ir a7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~eLa~ a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a :,a~~ ~ Figure 4 (cont'd) Tidal Current Charts, New York Harbor (Spring Tides-Knots) 02 Figure 4-k Figure 4-1 0 2 &, . .� * t 4 Hours After Low Water 5 Hours After I!: \ Low Waterj �9: ) / '..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~' E La 1.3 C lO/{~ -I~'~iUa HELL OA~t>~ ~ ; '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N 0, .4 M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;-- ----- a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--44 06 C15 ~~- 11 If,,,,i-.~-,�,�� V/ '( - ~~i:::~~:~~;'0.5 n-;II�-;7~~~~~ Figure 5 Tidal Current Charts, Long Island Sound (Spring Tides-Knots) Q2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~0 Slac .7 . ..~~~~~~-... 02 Sac 02 A F BB cret Iww FAST at the RAME I Figure 5LbI.07 0 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. Figure 5 (Cont.) Figure 5-d _-c *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J 2 9 c 3'~lot~~ Figure 5 (Cont.) Fiue5-e J 4 -~~~~ .~~~~~j � ~~~~21.7 32 .0~' 2 6 Nz. 77 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 hoars AffR rwret -- , ~~~tunms EA4ST ft the RA CE Figure 5 (Cont.) Figure~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5- Figure~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A CIA - 30 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 .4' ,.. t WEST a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(t the RA4CE ~~~~~~~~~~~Jy' IhAFTigcuren5t ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 2.- 02 04 ~ ~ ~ >~.-I Figure 5 (Corit.) Figure~~~~~~~~~~~~*. 5-1. O A 09 ~~~~20 hosAR0carn J6 tn WES at the RACE Figure 5 (Cont.) FigueT5-k .1 ~ LL ~~~~ ~~~~~ / " ~~~~~~~~~~4 hoirs AFTER cfiarenft tr WEST at the OACE V 1.3 ~~~~ Li \ C.,1. 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4. 5 Shows AMTR clm-It two HOST at the RACE Tidal current station data are for predicting flow of water at or near the surface. Circular flow, current variations with depth and distance from shore, and mixing are characteristics of flow which are not reflected in the tidal current data. In many areas tidal data is insufficient to predict net tidal flows. III. 3. Grotsndwater Gaging Network The groundwater of Long Island is the sole'fresh drinking water supply for Nassau and Suffolk Counties. The aquifers are independent from mainland aquifers and all of the groundwater comes from percolation of rainfall or recharge directly on Long Island. Groundwater leaves the aquifers through gaining streams, subsurface discharge to bays, evapotranspiration and water supply withdrawals. The water levels in aquifers have been measured for the past 43 years. Appendix A is a copy of the monthly "Water Resources Summary, Long Island, New York, March 1975". III.4. Precipitation-Temperature Weather stations are located at LaGuardia, Newark, Bridgeport and New Haven Airports. These and other stations are located on Figure 6. The average annual precipitation for NOAA's Coastal Division is 45.47 inches. Average annual and monthly precipitation and temperature data for area stations, are presented in Table 14. 111.5. Hydrologic Cycle Precipitation, surface runoff, groundwater flow, evapo-transpiration, and surface water evaporation are phases of the hydrologic cycle. Moisture in the air which causes rainfall comes from the evaporation of surface water and evapo-transpiration of plants. Stream flow is from runoff of precipitation and from groundwater. Groundwater which feeds streams and bays comes from the percolation of precipitation. III-16 Bay and Sound salinities, stream flows, water stages are dependent on the hydrologic cycle. Sewering, water supply withdrawals, and land-use changes can effect change in the hydrologic cycle. Chapter VIII provides more detail. 0 11I-17 Figure 6 Weather Station Locations ~~~~~~~~~~ 0 1 lv,,,.4 0 %/w....wr e cipta t n only N-& *- 3tP Sre cipitationt an Temp eatr rq .J- * Peitameratle and*a Evaplo ato n Typeag e: N on-R e cdin g 0 U..! P.11., ti,,, , 2.. "an It. a u,.. SWB4a 0* *) . Ren t ' ' %I echor d ain g B o t h t "- . A-. I0~ D r'cl co m bnat'ion' I ty..ala ........ IA*7 'q~ <.L- .... -....... deao- m.ete.or . i ca data . ?'I 7I I-Is STATION LEGEND (I) P~~recip itation s Cotage -(2) -- ) Precipitation and Temperature ..e1l ?.. recipitation, Temperature and Evaporation Type of Gage: Notn-RecordingQ Record-ing* Both types ( Double �ircle combi.nations i.ndicate the availabi.lit~y of more detailed meteorological data. 11-18 Table 14 CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION PRECIPITATION (IN.) COASTAL DIVISION January February March April May June July August September October November December Annual Bridgehampton 4.20 3.59 4.61 3.62 3.44 2.88 2.92 4.42 3.67 3.55 4.66 4.10 45.t Central Park 3.31 2.84 4.01 3.43 3.67 3.31 3.70 4.44 3.87 3.14 3.39 3.26 42.: Kennedy 3.23 2.93 4.15 3.48 3.67 3.35 4.04 4.97 4.16 3.21 3.51 3.23 43.9' LaGuardia 3.31 3.09 4.23 3.57 3.58 3.38 3.71 5.08 3.92 3.37 3.59 3.39 44.2. Scarsdale 3.36 2.78 4.39 4.10 4.21 3.79 4.51 4.90 4.40 3.81 4.10 3.73 48.0 Setauket 3.87 3.19 4.26 3.70 3.55 3.40 3.55 4.10 3.91 3.36 4.12 3.64 44.6 TEMPERATURE (OF) January February March April May June July August September October November December Annual Bridgehampton 32.0 31.9 37.6 46.6 56.1 65.3 71.3 70.7 64.4 55.1 45.3 34.8 50.9 Central Park 33.2 33.4 40.5 51.4 62.4 71.4 76.8 75.1 i 68.5 58.3 47.0 35.9 54.5 Kennedy 31.8 31.6 38.7 49.0 60.2 70.1 75.9 74.5 67.8 57.6 46.2 34.9 53.2 LaGuardia 33.6 33.6 40.8 51.2 62.1 71.5 76.8 75.4 68.8 58.6 47.4 36.4 54.7 Scarsdale 30.5 31.2 38.5 49.7 60.5 69.3 74.3 72.7 65.6 55.3 44.2 33.1 52.1 Setauket 33.0 32.8 39.2 49.5 59.8 68.4 73.8 72.5 66.3 57.1 46.8 35.8 52.9 IV. WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE I. Surface Water Sampling Programs There are numerous sampling programs within the planning area. The oldest active program is New York City's Harbor Survey for which there are 60 years of record. No two sampling programs are the same. Some sampling is done once a week; other sampling cruises are run a single time. Sampling may be related to tides or rainfall. Some samples are measured for bacterial indicators, some for heavy metals, others BOD, nitrogen, chlorophyll, turbidity, temperature, or- species diversity. Samples may be from the surface, below the surface, near the bottom, or even bottom sediments. Even established routine sampling programs are changed. New stations are established, old stations discontinued, -new measurements are taken, and short term mass samplings of areas are made. Table 15 summarizes the major routine sampling program, as of 1974. The 200 stations, which were regularly sampled and tested for both bacteria and various chemical and physical characteristics, are located on Figures 7, 8 and 9. These programs have changed over the years. Table 15 and Figures 7, 8 and 9 are representative of program status as of 1974. In 1975, NYS DEC initiated additional monthly sampling at 17 ocean stations between Rockaway Point and the west end of Fire Island. Suffolk DEC has sampled streams and estuaries for several years. In 1974, the program was expanded to develop numerous open water stations. Since 1974, various station changes have been made, and the tables for this case may, therefore, not be fully representative. The routine bacteriological sample stations are in addition to the 200 more completely evaluated samples. They are used to insure the adequacy of water * ~quality in bathing beach areas. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation does additional sampling in shellfish areas to insure the acceptability of shellfish for market- IV - able purposes. The National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration routinely samples benthic macrofauna, samples sediments and measures the hydrography of larger bodies. In addition to these large routine sampling programs, there have been numerous othersurveys which include: the Marine Sciences Research Center of the State University of New York surveyed the water and sediments of the North Shore Bays in the summer of 1971. In 1968, the Town of Hempstead conducted a study of Hempstead Bay, Oyster Bay and the Atlantic off Jones Inlet. The tides and currents of Jones Inlet were measured in 1964. Cruises have been made from New York Harbor to Long Island Sound. Connecticut has begun a routine sampt-ing program. Eaton's Neck dumping ground is one of four dump sites in the nation studied in the Aquatic Disposal Research Project; and many others. Rather than establishment of additional sampling stations or more extensive sampling, a primary need for the basin is a coordination of the various sampling programs. Data collected in one program cannot readily be compared with data from another and data must generally be obtained directly from each collecting agency. Efforts are being made by the State DEC Bureau of.Monitoring-and Surveillance to standarize collection, test parameters, and develop compatible data storage-retrieval systems. STORET, a US EPA computer storage of data on a basin basis, provides for some coordination of data. IV-2 TABLE 15 Regularly Measured MAJOR ROUTINE SAMPLING PROGRAMS (as of 1974) 5 $ e M ROUTINE CHEMICAL/BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING a P .- 4 C r SAMPLING APPROX. NO. APPROX. YEARS FREQUENCY OF � -, C 0 o W PROGRAM STATIONS OF RECORD SAMPLING C 0 o - X s NYC-Harbor Survey 40 60 Weekly; Jun-Sep. x x x x x ISC-Schedule A 15 2 Monthly x xx x xx x x x x ISC-Schedule B 16 2 Monthly x x x x x x Nx � x ISC-Schedule C 14 2 Monthly x x x x Kx K x x x Westchester-HD 36 3 Summer biweekly x x x x x x x x x Nassau-HD 64 16 Monthly x x x xx x xx x x Suffolk-DEG'* 100 1 Quarterly x x x x x XX x NYS 5 7 Summer-Monthly x x x x x x X x ROUTINE BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING Sampling Approx. No. Approx. Years Approx. No. Program Stations of Record Beaches NYC-DH 28 25 6 areas Westchester-HD 48 32 Nassau-HD 116 80 Suffolk-HD 168 224 OT ER, SAMPLING Sampling Program Areas Sampled Sampled NOAA L.I. Sound, Raritan Bay Benthic macrofauna, sediments NOAA NY Bight, N.J. Shore Hydrography NYS-DEC L.I. Sound, Great South Shellfish bed Bay, Peconic Bay, certification Gardners Bay Atlantic IV-3 WESTCHESTER LEGEND 0, 4A~~~t~solt sultvs/ s- A~ ISC-SCHEDULE A oISC-SC14EDULE 5EO BUOA~C/ 2 RONX MONUItOING s7A710% ~~~~~~APIGSTATIONS �0 RARITAN BAY % - 1974SOUN -- -- ~~~~~PLANNING AREA (17) FIGURE 7 i IV-4 WESTCHE5 ERcp LONS ISLAND SOUND 36 Q~UEENS ) ~~~MIDL P6 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~'i O c t 1 ATLANTIC OCEAN - L.I. SOUND Sol ~~~~~~~~~PLANNING AREA (17) 69 70 7/JONES INLET LGN LEGEND ~~~~~~5 05 Statute Miles 5 0 Kilonvaters *(1-36) WESTCHESTER H.D. u UNutc Mie * (37-100) NASSAU H.D. Scal A (a-n) ISC-SCHEDULE C ~~~~~~~SAMPLING STATION S (1974)7/5 F IGURE 8 o NYS-SURVEILLANCE Poe~~~~~~~~~Y~ ISLAND/ --SOUND GARD- IN9R\ SAY SAMPLING STATIONS 0~ . TABLE 16 LOCATIONS OF CHEMICAL STATIONS MrP NO, STATION No,. WNAT-N HO - ~Imfos A O IiloglN. ii VkrEX -D LWATION MC0 ancbor Survey I 3~~ ~ ~~-7 jataica NWy - --f F.Vrme Batin J3427 Jiseeic say - Sheath larzin ealsi 1~ ~~~~- j. anaica B.; - Couga pi"r. Beach Channal, nati44 13Ba reh, ra das 3 J-3 J-1oi sty - sAn ft. S. of Contrsis piat J I-S je.1tc Isy . R~essl laid1., leach Chne 4 J-2 H ill Basis - Ret and tf caol5.33 .o o 0 etS ~a~ePe J1 stay 3. -Coot st I ire 3 .11~~~~~~~~~~~3-2 mitt Bsais - eaSt and N-PA Rackavy nlt .Buoy '2' RX1-2 lodater.Il -X.Mae leland totfall, 7 V146 *Atlantic Oarmen -oo, 1.7 ni. S. Rockmeyf*34 lpaway fnlt- reItaAid. S ~~~~~11.? Loar Bay - 2m ft. S. St-epl~eboax pier A G A Aitletli Oceef - Ltg GM I' 0 1-6~~~Ir Lower lay - S"l ft. OMd Orchard Lo. 12-3 Lower 3ay - 250 ft. S. of Stseplachta., Pier 10 1-SA Raritas liver it sony "r 3 ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ LI-4 Lower Ur7 - 1/4 ei. lil Horton point, Wi. lIo 11 1-5 Arth~~ liii - nfl titteseille Ferry Slip K 0X'1-13 Narrovei - Mid-Chaount, ounder bridge 1l IK-4 Arccer Kill - Sufftesh inxIU 1. 1142 Upper say - lid Bay Ridge Ch.noe, 13 X-3 Arthur 1151 - a & 0 Railroad Bridge i t 01.3 ppatr lay - Passaic Vailley Onifalls Ida 1~~ ~~-2 Newark ray - St of Shooters sland 3 99-21 Uppar Mly * Msis Ship Chansal Lt. Bell '30" 1.5 1-i Artrow 1111 - ~~~~~~~~~ Oppar Way 0 11~~~~U-25 uppeBar sy- Oft Pier A, the Battery 26 H N a row - Id ch111U-20 Upper lay - tlpoth East-River 13C -SCH~EE C 17 H-7 uvpc my - Lt- 3011 '24'~~~~~~~ ra-IS Lon Island Sound-Middl* of ThrASS Rack Blid3* is 1-6 upper B" - La. Ron Ila-~~~~~~~ LI-i? LI13-50 PA. off Stepping Stouns N- of ROMs 19 N-5 Upper flay - afu liar A. thea Battery -1LsOfBel27atGnWyac 20 N-Ic Hudson River - fTI Azd StreaKLelilOflU"7 t tgayok il-li LIS-lOSIT boil 21 N- 3A Nodsos liver - off 72od Street I2Ll arcmBel' 21 1-33 Rdads liver - off 225th Street LI2LnprChseRo1, 23 i-3 lodsoo River - ofn 155th Street2 LSCtj' aro L 4 24 V-2 Buots Piver- -~ Soffe Stnlg1-7 -aputain' lahesiLIa b, LI-2aLSGrev Point Has -Al 25 *~~~-I Holton liver - amfflt. St. Vincent Acadoey I LI-29 LUS-Stoodord berate Lt. Sars & Light JLI-30 LU3-Stosford Lt. Bell "32" & Lt. Bell "1.5 and 28 1-3 wratis River- 155th, Street - kLI-3i L25-oystmv Bay cong " 19 2-4 Bartens liver - 9XIla Ame. I TJ-32 LI-Nuatcerok Pt. Lt. Hall 121' 30 11-3 Barlo liver - Boat of Root 106th LI-33 supstead Rarlmr - Bell "6" ted Light 31 214 Eaat ivr - Oft Uac l0 ve-htttt5 LI-34 M nthasset Bay -LT.C Ruy 'I' Si 1-2 fast River - foot of East 23rd Street UMICHISTM HF-ATIR DEtARV-- 33 2-3 text Rivac - foot of East 42od Street 134 Rev SRohelle Harbor - 9. of LI. 34 1-4 Uat River - Bell Cat. onder BI Bridge 233 Ntv.Rachallft Harbor LB "'IV 33 2-5 Etot liver - 1/3 m1Z arretto Pt. to Ilet's . 33 32 Davenpprt Hock - Paut 36 3-fi flushing B"y - SOD ft. N. Co~lage Pt. ferry Slip, S Davenport Neck - Plst X. Beach 37 1-7 East Mivr - 1/3 off Whitesteans polar N4ebho sty - berates LB '3W ted 3 "29'" 38 2-8 East Rivr - Wi chanoal at hro5gs Bac 6 2 Loom boland Stood - LB "2" 39 2-9 I7ong Ilal ond s.d -. ML n. N of Stepping osesn Lt 23 Long bsantd Stood - N11211 boll 40 2140 Long Isleed Stood - 250 ft. off Sart uleB. S 13. 5gIn tod-PaI tc 9 36 Long Islond Stood- 10 ~~~~30 t erm bey - Sadoos Pk. Beach a ~ ~~ U12- Lover Bay - 550 feat off Old Otchard Lt. 20chlyBsi1 b 12~~~T-2 Lower sty - D.W. Bell off Midldand leach Ito ac 22 R 5ebh ay -8 SottosYWCUu c 11~~~U-13 at~onrs - Ifid-Chmasoal uoder Bridg cosy-Eh t COtel d 11~~~~i-11 Kil Van, loll - Mid-Channel'opposite Lt. Buoy "35"2 27 Echo Bay - below Preaiolm NUX Peed C IS~~~3-S ewaark Bay - bet""m Lt. Buoy 'W4 atd li I= A ` 31 arhotlahr-N..ad f 11-3 levark Bay - Sooth Reath, above R.I. Bridge -16 isLorchnot lathrbo N1.C. Side M1-12 eawrk lay -North Reach, &ahoe L.O. R.I. Bridg. -IaaenekHro ot lt ie b1 A1-S Arthur Kill - at B & 0 3.I. bridge merao Barham - CM5 1, I ~~~~~AK- Arthur 1111 - at Rahwaey River 19 X-..a.rssk lather - LaIV05 S 11~~~~A-13 Arthur Xii - between Lt. Suty '"121 andi Lt. Sony "1" 20 13long Island loved - M11TT boil &-3 Arthu KILL - Ward Point Sand 21 14 Nausacenek Harbor - Xen "4" (I) 32-10 Itriten Bay - Li. Bony"5 21~~~~~~~22 i Mitom Harbor - Betotes La "5" and R "6" (v) 13-lA laritan lay - Can "3" off Commatkak Pt. 2 l a liliesHaathr -.Nmool of Blind 5100k 124 1at~~~~~~~~t55 Bay - 2~~~~~~~~L_ Laon Island Stood - L seln "hi" (o) 11-~~7 atritea may - Lt. Buony 4" off Leonardo Flar Zs II Long Island Seond . 1x0 1 i., L Sell "42" 26 9 L ong I.slan StOMA - 1380. 1 Si., L eI 551 3"IA' 27 7 ~~~~~~~Long Island Booed - BBSTF boil IV-7 TABLE 16 (cont'd.) LOCATIONS OF CHEMITCAL STATIONS NAP NO. STATION MO. vx-rut WDT0 - LOCATION4 MAP A.SAINo?. 11015 N'OY - LOCATION 29 10 Lang~~~~~~~~t.. lalood Sounda - SM??P ball so 2-401 J-nS Ilelt-25O yd. Wf. I In 317 Re 30 4 Long zalaebfocdd - l30* I .1. * N "2" 81 2.409 Atlantic oceon-ili ml. ea ... a-1 f . ParkingPrkintN cd 1 31 MePot Cheater Herbor - Now, '2 a x A-USZyed hne-ff1 eptad ca 32 4 Port Cheste9fr Mchr - mouth, off jetty 534-123 Bin; Ck.anooleutb a Si OSR ' 33 44part Chester Bather - near Cabin RoSa *4 -126lo hnelhteO~ 34 n 09 34 3 Byre- tne: - 5.6'. Boat Teed S s 5.13C S loop Ch-anl oral Bermertcs Ch-1na 33 34 Byron Stor - ?CST? boil. 56 6-29 Locks B., - 125 pd. off 0. Shoret, berenen entra..... 36 2 Byree, 11'er - Ka ftids*..~~~~~~~5 4.40 sea Dog Creek and Lorg Crook NASSAU AT.AL~~~~~~~~~h 0TARTI'STTT 58~~~~~~~~~ 5-173 Broad CreekChne-, 31 4-403 Little Neck Bay - 300 yd. off Wdalls (11Pc H~illn Creak - 35 " S 40 Little neck Bay - Mtdharbur Iff F. Tettont Moot 90 4.93 Baldwin Bay -toot of Nillborn Creek 39 14-407 LIS-hetw..o T. Beck Stock & King* PC. Host 9 1 5-403 H etrick Bey' - 3 VEntcd 40 14-418 I ..g lulond Sound - -if Barst i. Lt. 9 2 5---IS toot Bay - IGO yd. W1. ilootogh Mecto Entr-one 41 9-414 Ma BoetBy -Mouth of Boy 935-17 *Eat Bay - 300 yd. S. Whihte Pt. 42 9-409 iftonhaaet S.)-Bu, 1q.'4'~ 94 3-116 Bormernee Ch-..Inelan Goose Creek 43 9-406 KteobaSoet SAY e- bewee C 'S"S21 `40 943 6-L9 -Chanerl--L- Ones Creek- Bridge, 44 9 -412 B~~~y Midb.7 if P-rt W--h. YC 96~9 6-B HoasoPeque Creek - 300 pci. off W9. Mouth 43 9-413 s. eshetBey 4.~~e~ 2 50Cd 97 6.401 S-uth Oysttr Bay-3iG 1d. S. 44 14-422 Long Soloed Oo...d-lOAO ft. A of Sell 1230 98 h-3D etZhne-aoc 83.0adSuwS 47 14.122 LU-bet Ctote. Lt. & 1, Bell .21 e an 49 .39 Amity Chanoa-300 yd. S. BOqua Pt. Larch. Lt. 4 Glen C. Lt. IO W 2-409 . Atlantic, roan.-ib L. offI Tobay Beaach 4 8 1 5 -54& long 1lod Sou-d-16GO yd. 1. Spring Bach..- 49 10-30.1 Sanpetead Barber-COST? boil MrS.- S113NIFLT\N.1CE 50 ~~~~~~~10-49.1 BeoPatead Barbr-beween UC"A '44Oe - A' USte "B'eat Channel 730 St- Wf. CoPtroa Bridge BS101 Merieben B., Narrow Po ion c. 5SW Maettc 31 zo-&s~~~o neopotead Harbor - BA yd. 5. Can e90 105 9landoce Bay - Off Indian teMylOff[,.di and B B 110 ~~~~Mor Bay - Off Thin0, Poot loa.dW 3: I I-46 Heopst-4'ad Baro S. Bun 1 - B 200 Be'epetead Barber -'off Mar B~eah 53 I I -An eeaodBr.ber -off Incinerator ntack 34 13-402 I-htonL. Bell 21 & C -19-, off P..oe Pt.l 5.TOLC 33 13-403 Son Saint Sound-hO yd. P. of C n19e 36 15%-404 Iis-htwaeo C e19.. 4 Bell e3e10 lod4Oic .ib 10 ekBe M-C-1 Still C-ccI B4ill PI... 57 1.5-ACS L..g elaoad Snod-lOG yd. A. Bel 11" '1-1 swcy Sallow zt, iRauto 25A4 58 H 2 ill Sack Crek - Center, Snutb of -i rehPdEoaiidRd 59 12-6 Oysetr Bay Bather - 130 yd. nit & 300 Yd. 2. of 0.3. BridsaROi lccoon u.s.oa. 9050 40 12-13 O7ster BMY Mvachr Middle, Wet h'iS-2 lNioueciueau7.oi. Drele St 1.2-2 oyaer IS? Barber 200 pci. off - XBs.qc.t out 307 eoeatP. 7P. SL.-i Bcp .ok 0:st 14411 Road 62 32-401 Oyeter Bay Harbor- 0BPS? boil 3(41 eic -vHon, Couty load 63 12-12 Dyoter Bay Barbor - 300 yda. off - Pai- P~c 3eAf~ero.eHe~ Rood Ceotar 1. Shore -S To'oSc:2rog,-,Li510- 44 i2-23 OYoter Boy Barber - 120 yd. S. of Bun "11 esNStr r1-4 S'cwoSie 51' L Shutt. tool 65 13-403 -. old Sprig Borbor -W olbrber off Cooper Bluff MSi T-eDetc' .5.0.G. Csa L1110 'ia 64 12-40S Cold Spring turbot - mid harbor Lt-i, LitLla 0�: C CctC-lrol Ra naar lower 1:1-i :1 oc riller C.rad 67 1-401 tact gocheauy tiet. - Sun ~'B' v-.Mi.U? l.X 48 3-418 Reynolds Cha.-el & Boeeiatar Cree.k TO-I- Bnrr?, Cree r.ute 24 69 1-403 Atlantic Ocean - 114 mL. a 230 Td. tiC-k Herl-ar C. ok 01Cocr,: road v. of El Patio- CA-i S-siiil Cor.k .tl toc 70 ~~~~~~ ~~~1-405 Atlantcl O..aa - 114 mL. off Long Beach T. Hall Tri-I -.rry Czar; ltbod frntlead 71 1-609 ~~~~~~~~~~Ailansic Ocean - 1/4 ml. off T. lfee. P.Jr ITA-1 Roo Once' I'tcoci;C- Riaiood fl 3-414 BanlaCanl uy00AC-i Anitlii c-,o 01015.' BA.- 73 3-406 Seyne~~~~~~~~~07lda Chanl- Lf Aion oec CI niS-1 Cr-b - raIPlc 74 4-49 leyneid. Channel 130 'd. 1. Lang Beech C-t"oo~' Crock Libety 27cec 73 3.415 That Load -Id lWeOdah,.gh Chco~j BC-i Sermnntat1re Coci .retu. Perk 76 ~~~~~~~3-420 Broa Chano.e-ff S. -d of PealaeBaaock 510-2 Oaoataeeq~e Crock U-nt Ul~frn- 7p 3-82 3 ag Island.Channe - at Born-Se Channel . Rotaa-u C..nd TautOifi 72 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~51-2 S;tosap .u V.rc Seerino iliybwa 78 - 4.403 Sacenena- Channel - off HE conner, of Caectt K-re S-3 !outapugo ccc Rn (:0-na 79 3~~~~~-40% He let ay-230 yd. off Bey Perk Beach TV-B 8 TABLE 16 (cont'd.) LOCATIONS OF CH-EMICAL STATIONS CS-2 Z-il. River park A-av.. CS-3 Teils River U.S.G.S. .3.10 cs-I ncrfls River S.-rI;. klglsoy cs-$ teIl .L.Rivr ria& Lake CotlteR CS7 Thviie River August Roadl CS-i umus RIve eira Lk Ote CS-H mail S PAver August Road cSO-1 - %I tetun CWree ....g StK-3 .LvaSCreek Su-rise RighacY SAIl-H 4 ae Creek Ranter Avenue Seal-S so~~~ea~unc rc ay Sheer Road4 5K-i S5.oA~CeCrek K.,ppuc Rood me-i WiljUrt e-,r froth wo a- ju-J], Seer-. Tc-i Tr-e Conk puodi 27 CL-i 1 Corode Laker Haute 2' , Irk-i o1 cjeCa4 Route 27!, PS-i recqi Caret U.S.G.S. gages PS-2 Pectooci, Crak Boo-te... PS-i eatqi core South Shore 11ail AU-i Aoi.. Croci Route 27k All-2 Aw- Creek S..leeie tigivay t~ee-i Grooms Creek r.Scrch 2Laf~ti Scuiev-rd CS-i Chepkli., Creek U.S.G.S. 4q.g SRt-i Cxet. Live: Great Piece road 11P-i West P_ crook Sc ne igh-a CO-i cocee%-ot Rivet U.S.G.S. 9gag CO-3'Caecect;aot River Veker-co Iligh..y, CO-S cersu Ri-c Jokeore Accrue CCi Ge c reek cekpoad 851- 0Gee Crook I. D~rench Gecko 27k P101-2 Gre r Ek a .. RrrCh Racer 210 Tel-i Tatakito Ccti Rou.te 2lk PAT-3 P, tr.aso- Tta- Cos:ioaOce ill-i SI-L firr olte27 C--i Rd CreekSocro ai AG-) Zeeue Crack SO. Core,nt7 Read )1- eei~Ccxe. G.,' Co.... fii Rtet. zRace S-. Ceov4t~. Soad ~ 3eavera~ Creek So. Ceacery Read CA-a 1 er ae rr usGte CA-H 0eur ie GrietR ad es *CA-I CUM.,- fjactC_ 5 oeaRa 3,0-i c-geRve ?. Oor os 7 ~~~-S Th-ge River t. Unor_ Aut 27A rae-a tici Steer Sc1--ar 270 &-t-k AC-atca Ci: Catle, ~~ Tiaea Creek creste 27A V. WASTEWATER SOURCES AND PLANS FOR ABATEMENT V.I. Pollutant Sources, Characteristics and Effluent Requirements Sources of pollutants may be grouped in many ways. Ten categories have been used in this plan: 1. Municipal discharges 2. Industrial discharges 3. Combined sewer overflows 4. Thermal discharges 5. Oil and grease sources 6. Dredge spoil and sewage sludge disposal 7. Vessel wastes 8. Duck farms 9. Radioactive wastes 10. Non-point sources V.l.a. Municipal Discharges Municipal discharges have the largest single impact on water quality. The total discharge to the Atlantic Ocean/Long Island Sound area averages 1,600 million gallons per day. Inadequately treated municipal discharges can cause low dissolved oxygen concentrations, high coliform bacteria counts, sludge banks, turbid water, and contribute phosphorus and nigrogen compounds as nutrients to aquatic growth. Standard "secondary treatement" will reduce biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids by 85 percent. In most cases, this is sufficient to eliminate problems of low dissolved oxygen and turbidity. "Advanced waste treatment" methods are used to achieve higher than 85 percent removals of BOD, trace metals and organics removal, increased bacterial destruction, virus inactivation, and nutrient removal. V-1 Appendix D contains a listing of over 500 industries, municipalities, institutions, etc. that have been identified as dischargers to waters of the planning area. Section V.2.b. and Table 17 provide details on the more significant municipal discharges. Discharges may be located on Figures 10, 11 and 12. Municipal dischargers are required by law to provide at least secondary treatment by July 1, 1977. The effluent limits to be met through secondary treatment are presented in Table 18. Where secondary treatement is inadequate to meet in stream water quality standards, more stringent effluent limits are established, and advanced waste treatment must be provided. Municipalities that are unable to meet the July 1, 1977 deadline because of insufficient time are issued interim discharge requirements and placed on a schedule for abatement. Effluent limits are included in SPDES/NPDES permits and where treatment is inadequate, the schedules of compliance are also included within the permits. These permits are on file with NYS-DEC and US EPA. Copies are available to anyone for inspection. Models developed through the 208 studies will be used to determine needs for advanced waste treatment for BOD removals on a water segment basis. With the exceptions of expanded discharges to confined bays, limited modeling and survey results have indicated that secondary treat- ment will be adequate in terms of BOD removal. Removal of nitrogen requires the application of advanced waste treatment; conventional secondary treatment provides only about 20 percent nitrogen removal. Nitrogen is a principal nutrient for plant growth. In most marine environs, carbon, phosphorus and sulfur are readily available to plants, while nitrogen is scarce and limiting to plant growth. Dissolved nitrogen is provided to aquatic plants in bay areas by fresh V-2 LEGEND MUNICIPAL - INSTITUTIONAL * METAL FINISHING AND OTHER INDUSTRIES I. NASSAU SMELTING AND REFINING 2. SUCREST 3. BUSH TERMINAL 4. AMSTAR I- 5. INTERBORO SURFACE 6. PHELPS DODGE 7. PEARL WICK 4.'. POWER PLANTS PORT CHESTER STP a.LILCO - FAR ROCKAWAY ETH TR Ib. CON ED - ARTHUR KILL WETClyE c.CON ED.- HUDSON AVE/f d. CON ED - EAST RIVER' aIDst T a. CON ED.- WATER SIDE IR SI I. CON ED.- RAVENSWOOD MM R N C T q. CON ED - 74TH ST h. CONED-ASTORIA -4. ~~~~~~~NEW ROCHELLE ST OUTFALL ~~~~~~~~~~~~EARHDSI V. STP \ ~~~~~OWL HEAD STP NASA 40TAUX CNY. STP ~ O ST -JMAINONAE STT.SI ~~~~~ALANI OCAEAN ~~WSTEDSHRS RARITAN BAY ~ -- ATLANTIC OCEAN -L.I. SOUND * ....- ~~~~~~~PLANNING AREA (17) FIGURE 10 V- 3 HUNTINGTON STP NORTHPORT VETERANS -~ ~~~j1SIA T PORT JEFFERSON STP WESTCHE ER 0s~~~~~~~~~~~~ TEXQ 0 0 ~ ~~~ 00 0 ROOKHAVEN ~~Ie I ~HUNTINGTON HAY BAYA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$IP ~~~I JNES NE NA SD~~ _ T ~ ~ ~ ~ UFL SEE -LNDOMS WASTE DSHRESOL77 INABSAU X 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~97 0~ ~~ -fA POERPANT CVNGRDSOA PT IUE w~~~~x * *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~LC YQ~~j ~4~~ISLAN GADNR SON co~~t4D _ _ _ - - IBA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IC SROOKH~~~~~~~~ATE 'LASTA.T RIVERHEAD~~~~~~~~~0JU1 FARMS BAY~t Mi NDERSLUDRM~ ~ ~ m f s ~ e STP~~~~~WIHWST AE BROOKH~~~~~~~~~~~NSAVEN WST DISPCSARGEIS DUCK~~~~~~~ > OUFALL SWRDL i *-METAL FINISHING AND PLANN~~INGUAREA 12 17) 17 Table 17 Waste Sources and Abatement Statue Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17). Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number 6 Classification Facilities .Built -/day-- MD . Requirement *** HAJOR MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES *** (Note: Major Thermal Discharges at end of table) I. New York Bavys - Arthur Kill - Kill Van Kull Nassau Smelting and --- Mill Creek, I -Chemical addition 1973 ------- Metals 0.331 -Sanitary waste to Refining and precipitation (Actual) Oakwood Beach STP to remove metals upon completion of and adjust pH interceptor -Cooling Tower -Meet BPT with. existing treatment process NYC-Port Richmond, 346 (Kill Van Kull, II Primary 1953, BOD .. 24 BODU - 150,000 10 -Under construction to WPCP 593 1964 (Actual) NOD 90,000 (Design) upgrade to 60 MG Under BOD . 85 (New Design) 17.1 step aeration STP Con- (Proposed) (Actual) -Expand collection <struc- 60 system tion (New -Convert to separate CD D esign) sewers Sucrest Corporation --- Erie Basin, I None ---- BODu 2,500 9.65 (Actual -Procesa waste to Primary Red Hook STP in Cooling) future or provide BPT -Continue barometric condenser cooling water discharge Bush Terminal --- Cowanus Bay, I None ---- ----- BODu - 7,000 0.995 -Inventory of tenants Associates (Actual needed to establish San., combined BPT limits Proc. 6& -Provide treatment or Cooling) join Owls Head System NYC-Owls Head, WPCP 402 Upper New York Bay, Modified Aeration 1952 BOD - 55 BODu - 225,000 160 -Achieving only 357 I (Actual) NOD - 135,000 (Design) 55% removals BOD-- 85 (New Design) 99 -Facilities planning (Proposed) (Actual) underway. 135 -Probably provide (Proposed 135 MGD Activated Design) Sludge STP using pure oxygen -Abate combined sewer overflows NYC-Oakwood Beach, 392 Lower New York Bay, Modified Aeration 1956, BOD e- 58 BOD - 68,000 16 -Achieving only 58 WPCP SB Under (Attual) NOD - 40,000 (Design) -Under construction to Con- BOD,-- 85 (New Design) 19.1 pnd c o atruc- (Proposed) upgrade to 40 MD step atruc- (Proposed) (Actual) aeration STP tion 40 e -Expand collectionL - tion (New system Design) -Project prioritics'12 & 13 Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -- -#/dav- MGD Reuirement -70 MGD step aeration II. East River-Harlem River under construction NYC-Red Hook, WPCP 394 East River, SD -None; Raw Under BOD,.- 85 BODu - 175,000 70 -5Abat complet (Proposed) and Combined Sewer Con- (proposed) NOD - 105,000 (Design) sewer overflows Discharges struc- -To include flows from Newtown -Step Aeration tion Creek under Construction -Project Priorities #37,38,39 & 40 .Astar Corp. --- East River, SD -Sanitary waste to - --- --------- BODu - 2,100 9.27 -Sanitary waste is municipal system (Actusl) conveyed to municipal -Barometric condenser system discharges -Meet BPT for other wastes NYC-Newtown Creek 86 East River, SD 310 MD Activated 1967, BOD. .-60 BODU - 850,000 310 -Manhattan pumping station WPCP 713 Sludge 1975 NOD - 500,000 (Design) tied in 5/76. Includes 20 MGD UNOX (Actual) -The plant is limited in Demonstration Project 340. size by land availability (Actual) & presently overloaded -Engineering studies are proposed to evaluate pure oxygen, inflow infiltration problems, diversion to other collection systems & sub- divisions of district as means of reducing flows or increasing plant capabilities -Diverted flow is being incorporated into Red Hook design Interboro Surface --- ewto Creek, II -Dust Scrubber --- ------- TSS - 1500 .020 -Meet BPT, especially Sedimentation (Actual) suspended solids Pit Overflow reduction Phelps-Dodge Ref. 713 Newtown Creek, 1 -Sanitary : Raw ---- Metals and .565 -Sanitary wastes will Corp. -Process: Neutral- Cooling Water (Actual) be conveyed ;o ization and municipal system Precipitation -Meet BPT for metals, -Cooling Water; pH, temperature, etc. Cooling Towers pearl Wick, Corp. --- East River, SD None ---- --------- Metals and .041 -Sanitary wastes will Cooling Water (Actual) be conveyed to municipal system -Meet BPT for metals, temperature, etc. NYC-Wards Island, 214 East River, SD 1937, BOD -60 BODu - 440,000 210 250 mcD step aeration WICP 363 1948, (Actual) NOD - 260,000 (Design) under construction 395 Undbr BOD -- 85 (New Design) 150 -Abate combined Con- (Proposed) (Treated) sewer overflows struc- 115 tion (Bypassed) 250 (Ndw Design) Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built - -/dav- MGD Requirement NYC-Bowery Bay, WPCP 398 Rikers I. Channel, Activated Sludge 1939, BOD' - 63 BODu - 380,000 120 -150 MGD step aeration 406 SD 1958, (Actual) NOD - 220,000 (Design) under construction Under BOD ,-. 85 (New Design) 113 -Abate combined Con- (Proposed) (Actual) sewer overflows struc- 150 tion (New Design) Hunts Point, WPCP 143 East River, I Step Aeration 1952, BOD - -85 BODu - 335,000 150 -Being upgraded and 397 1964, (Proposed) NOD - 200,000 (Design) expanded to 200 MGD 399 Under (New Design) 151 step aeration STP Con- (Actual) -Harts Island; City atruc- 200 Island and Orchard tion (New Design) Beach STPs have been abandoped with flow now to Hunts Point STP -Abate combined sewer overflows Tallmans Island, WPCP 166 East River, I Activated Sludge 1939, BODe- 80 BODU - 133,000 60 -Only primary removal 404 1965, (Actual) NOD - 80,000 (Design) while under construc- Under BOD..- 85 (New Design) 61 tion Con- (Proposed) (Actual) -80 MGD modified struc- 80 aeration by June 1976 tion (New -BOMGD step aeration Design) by January 1977 -Abate combined sewer overflows III. Western Long Island Sound Port Chester 069 Byram River, SC Primary 1964 BOD.-18 BODu 16,000 6.0 vated sludge STP 695 (Actual) NOD - 9,300 (Design) -Effluent to discharge to 65BOD 85 (Existing) 6.2 proposed Blind Brook out- (Proposed) (Actual) fall -Provide sludge disposal service to Blind Brook -Project priorities #173 and #174 Blind Brook 105 long Island Sound, -Primary 1963 BOD. 19 BDDu - 8,300 5.0 -Upgrade to 5 MGD activated 696 SB -Outfall to Sound (Actual) NOD - 5,000 (Design) . sludge STP BOD-- 85 (Existing) 2.9 -Install new outfall to (Proposed) (Actual) serve Blind Brook & Port Chester -Pump sludge to Port Chester -Project priorities #145& #146 Mamaroneck 908 Long Island Sound, -Primary 1965 BOD- 28 BODU - 31,000 18 -Existing plant designed to SB -2.5 Mile Outfall (Actual) NOD - 19,000 (Design) handle 60 MCD storm flows to Sound BOD -. 85 (Existing) 185 -Upgrade to 18 MGD secondary (Proposed) (Acfual) STP -Upgrade to 15 MCD pure New Rochelle 5 long Island Sound, -Primary 1935, B(DAu 13 BODu 24,000 15 oxygen secondary STP SB -1.7 Mile Outfall 1964 (Actual) NOD - 14,000 .(Design) -Abate overflows to Sound BOD ..85 (Existing 14.5 Correct excessive (Proposed) Design) (Actual) inflow & infiltration -Project priority t Table 17 (coant'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Statue Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Waters Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -%- -#/day- MID Requirement III. Western Lone Island Sound Belgrave S.D. 609 Little Neck Bay, SB High Rate 1935, SOD - 80 BODU - 5000 2.0 Meet BPT requirements Trickling Filter 1965 NOD 3000 Great Neck VS. 341 Hanhasset Say, SB High Rate 1933, O8D . 85 BODu m 3750 1.5 Meet BPT requirements Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 2250 (Design) 1.0 (Actual) Great Neck S.D. 629 Manhaaset Bay, SB High Rate 1962, BOD ._ 85 BODU - 6740 2.7. Overloaded; expand Trickling Filter 1967 NOD - 4040 (Design) facilities in future 2.9 and extend service to (Actual) adjacent area Fort Washington 351, Manhasset Bay, SB High Rate 1951, BOD - 75 BODu ' 7500 3.0 -Unranked pending 666 Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 4500 project; 201 planning needed -Plant overloaded -Extend services to Vg. of Roslyn and adjacent area -Expand capacity to 6.5 MCD -Install outfall to Sound Roslyn Vg. 342 Hempatead Harbor, High Rate 1942, ODb 80 BODu - 1250 0.5 - Meet BPT requirements B Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 750 - Abandon plant and join with Port Washington in regional system in future Glen Cove (C) 236, Glen Cove Creek-I High Rate 1919, BOD.- 80 BODu - 10,000 4 xpand to 8 MD acti- 665 Hempstead Harbor, Trickling Filter 1964 NOD - 6,000 (Design) ted sludge StP with BB55~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~5.23 discharge to the tidal (Actual) mouth of Glen Cove Creek -Extend service to Sea Cliff, Roslyn Harbor, Brookville-Old. Westbury Area in future -Project priorities 52 & 53 Oyster Bay --- Oyster Bay Harbor, Hgsh Rate 1963 BOD 85 BODU - 3000 1.2 -Plant periodically SA Trickling Filter NOD - 1800 flooded at high tide -Sistem receives excessive infiltration/ inflow Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Waters Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -7.- -#/day- MGD Requirement IV. Central & Eastern LonR Island Sound Huntington SD, STP 343 Huntington Harbor, High Rate 1927, BOD ," 85 BODu - 5000 2.0 - Sewer system SA Trickling Filter 1956, NOD -- O NOD - 3000 receives considerable 1970 infiltration Northport STP 237 Northport Harbor, Extended Aeration 1973 BOD 85 BODu - 825 0.5 - Serves Centerport SA NOD. 50 NOD - 495 S.D. - Abated - Plant expansion and sewer services to surrounding area being studied Northport Veterans --- Subsurface Discharge Trickling Filter . BOD 85 BODu - 775 0.31 Hospital Sand Filtration NOD w 465 CD Stony Brook --- Subsurface Discharge Rated Aeration 1965 BOD .- 85 BODu - 900 0.36 - UDnrade Subdivision 1975 NOD - 540 -Planning area has Kings Park SD #6 --- Long Island Sound, Activated Sludge 1935, BODO- 85 BODu - 2500 2.0 been defined SA 1963 NOD -- 50 NOD - 1500 -Capacity available for expansion Port Jefferson STP 709 Port Jefferson Primary,Chlorination 1957, BOD - 35 BODu - 3680 2.27 - Existing system has SD #1 Harbor, SC 1962 NOD - 2210 (Design) considerable 1973 infiltration - 201 and 208 studies are underway. Completion of 201 study scheduled for 6/77 - Serves SUNY at Stony Brook and Lace Mill Greenport Vg. 621 Long Island Sound, Primary, Imhoff 1940 BO.D 33 BODu - 1251 0.5 - Plant being upgraded SA Tank NOD b- 0 NOD - 750 Actual to 0.5 MGD STP (0.3) consisting of 2 aerated lagoons for extended biological oxidation - Under construction - Project priority #69 V. Peconic River - Peconic Bav Area Brookhaven National --- Trib. to Peeonic Primary Clarifir, Unknown N.A. N.A. .3 Low level radio ive Laboratory River Sand filtersi wastes and sari waste are witsh acceptable limits Table, (coanted) Waste Sourc nd Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Obean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff., Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -#- -#/day- MGD Requirement Duck Farms (5 Farms) --- Peconic River Aerated Lagoons 1965- BOD - 85 N.A. N.A. Duck Farms to 1970 improve operation and convert to dry farming by 1983 Riverhead, New York 536 Peconic River - High Rate 1937, BOD.- 85 BODU - 3000 1.2 -Abated Peconic Bay, SC Trickling Filter 1971 NOD - 1800 Actual -201 underway - 0.6 Shelter Island Heights --- Dering Bay, SA Septic Tank, 1925 BOD r. 35 BODu - 100 Association Outfall Sewer NOD - 60 0.04 Provide secondary treatment Bulova Watch Company --- Sag Harbor Bay, SA None ---- ........-- Metals, 0.1 - Segregate cooling, Toxic sanitary and Substances process waste. Submit engineering report. - Sanitary waste to Sag Harbor STP 6 Sag Harbor Vg. 433 Sag Harbor Bay, SA None, 2 Sewer Proposed ----------- BODu - 250 0.1 - New, extended (Proposed) Outfalls and (Proposed) (Proposed) aeration plant Individual Sub- NOD - 150 under construction surface systems (Proposed) to provide 90% over- all removal - Outfall to be located outside breakwater - Future expansion to 0.5 MGD planned - Project priorities VI. Montauk Point - Atlantic Ocean -. .. 46 & 47 U.S. Air Force --- Atlantic Ocean, SA High Rate 1973 BOD - 85 BODu - 118 O.049 -Abated (Montauk) Trickling Filter NOD - 70 VII. Moriches Bav - Atlantic Ocean Duck Farms (17 Farms) --- Tributaries to Aerated Lagoons 1965- BOD - 85 N.A. N.A. -Duck farms to Moriches Bay 1970 improve operation and convert to dry farming by 1983 VIII. Great South Bay - Atlantic Ocean Duck Farms (2 Farms) --- Tributaries to Aerated Lagoons 1965- BOD - 85 N.A. N.A. -Duck farms to Great South Bay 1970 improve operation and convert to.dry farming by 1983 Patchogue, Vg. 741 Patchogue Cr., D Primary Settling 1927, BSOD s 35 BODu - 1250 0.5 -Upgrade level of treat- 1951 NOD - 750 ment, expand service -Participate in regional 208 Study, Suffolk Co. South Central Study Area -Planning area has been defined Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Ef. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -0- -#/day- MID Requirement Ocean Beach STP Great South Bay, Primary 1917, BOD 35 BODu - 1251 0.05 -Seasonal flows limited SA Chlorination 1950 NOD - 750 .- Limited room for expansion -Provide secondary treatment -Under construction -Project priority #55 Yaphank Regional 994 ----- - Proposed Proposed -- - - ---------- Undefined -208 study is underway S.D. (Proposed) -completion date for the study is 1177 dY~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~-Regional system, STP sites & design capacities are undefined *'~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~-Planning area has been defined South Central Study -- - --------- Proposed Proposed -......... ---------- Undefined -Regional projects to Area Disposal be defined in 201 6 208 District #2 studies -Planning area has been defined IX. South Ovyster Bay - Atlantic Ocean Suffolk Co. Southwest 624 Atlantic Ocean, Activated Under BOD 85 BODu - 75,000 30 -Regional STP & inter- S.D. #3 SA Sludge Con- NOD - 45,000 ceptors under struc- construction. Completion tion scheduled for January 1978 -Finalize plans for ocean outfall -Complete environmental restoration along route of outfall -Includes substantial amount of industrial waste -Project priorities #140, 141, 142, 143 & 144 West Central S.D. 995 --------- Proposed Prqpoaed -------- ---------- Undefined -208 study is underway (Proposed)- -Regional system, STP sites & design capacities are undefined .:. -Planning area hae defined Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -X/day- NGD Requirement XI. Jamaica Bav (conted) NYC-Rockaway, WPCP 68 Jamaica Bay, SB Modified Aeration 1952, BOD -' 20 BODu - 75,000 30 -Being expanded and 403 1961, (Actual) NOD - 45,000 (Design) upgraded to 45 YGD Under BOD/--85 19.3 step aeration STP Con- (Proposed) (Actual) -Abate,combined struc- 45 sewer overflows tion (New Design) Maimonides ___ Jamaica Bay, SD -Activated Sludge ---- OD 85 BODu - 15 .0060 -Buildings not currentl1 -Also raw discharges NOD - 9 (Design) connected to treat- (Design) .0017 ment facility shall be (Actual) connected NYC-Jam4ica, WPCP 109, Jamaica Bay, S8 Step Aeration 1943, B0O OBODu - 170,000 100 -Being upgraded WL 321, 1964, (Actual) NOD - 100,000 (Design) step aeration 400 Under BOD -,'93 93 -Abate combined Con- .(Proposed) (Actual) sewer overflows a truc- tion Spring Creek 347 Old Mill Creek, I -Temporary storage 1972 i,300,000 -Continue operation Auxiliary STP of combined sewage of and monitoring of -Primary settling and storage operation chlorination of excess -Use results of combined sewage observations -Retained sewage treated as basis for designs at 26th Ward WPCP in * of other combined dry weather sewer overflow corrective measures 26th Ward, WPCP 405 Hendrix Creek, I Step Aeration 1944 8OD -585 BODu - 140,000 60 -Being expanded and 1951 (Proposed) NOD - 85,000 (Design) upgraded to 85 MGD Under (New Design) 66 step aeration STP Con- (Actual) -Continue treatment strut- 85 of stored combined tion (New sewage from Spring Design) Creek Auxiliary STP -Abate remaining combined sewer overflows NYC-Coney Island, 396 Rockaway Inlet, SB Modified Aeration 1936 BOD 55 BODu - 183,000 110 -Upgrade to step WPCP 345 1963 (Actual) NOD - 110,000. (Design) aeration STP 044 BOD , a85 100 (Proposed) (Actual) Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year � ff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Sources Number & Classification Facilities Built -- -Ldayz D Requirement X. East Bay-Middle Bav-Hemostead Bay-Atlantic Ocean Nassau Co. SD #3 - 361, Atlantic Ocean, Activated Sludge 1974 BOD,- 85 BODU - 112,700 45 -Project 982 to Cedar Creek- 628, SA NOD - 67,500 include 5.0 MGD pilot 982 advanced wastewater treatment-recharge facility -Plant to be expanded to 90 MCD in 1981 to include Freeport and other areas -prtAecto pioLioies Jones Beach State --- Sloop Channel, Trickling Filter ---- BOD- 85 BODu - 6,250 25 .Meet BPT Park STP SA NOD - 3,750 (Design) requirements 0.225 (Actual Summer Flow) Freeport V. STP --- Stadium Park High Rate 1927, BOD 85 BODu - 10,000 4.0 -Connect to Canal, SC (Trib, of Trickling Filter 1961 NOD - 6.000 (Design) Nassau SD #3 Freeport Cr. And 3.7 -Receive some Hempstead Bay), I (Actual) industrial plating waste -Some infiltration inflow problems Nassau Co. S.D. #2 891 Reynolds Channel, Activated Sludge 1951, BOD N 90 BODu - 150,000 60 -Plant to be expanded Bay Park STP SB 1961 NOD - 90,000 (Design) to 90 MGD 65 -Install 3.0 mile (Actual) long ocean outfall to depth of 56 ft. -Receive waste from Cedarhurst and Lawrence in future Long Beach (C) 305 Reynolds Channel, High Rate 1952, BOD -. 85 BODu - 16,000 6.4 -Discontinue dis- SB Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 9,600 (Design) charge to Reynolds 6.9 Channel (Actual) -Tie into proposed Bay Park ocean outfall West Long Beach STP --- Reynolds Channel, High Rate 1927, BOD . 85 BODu - 7,500 1.5 -Meet BPT SB Trickling Filter 1960 NOD - 4,500 (Design) requirements 0.65 (Actual) Lawrence STP --- Banister Creek, I High Rate 1933, BOil 85 BODu - 3,750 1.5 -Pump to Bay Park (Trib. to Reynolds Trickling Filter 1966 NOD - 2,250 (Design) Channel) 0.76 XI. Jamaica Bay Cedarhurst STP --- Mott Cr., I Nigh Ra te 1934, BOD - 85 BODu - 2,500 1.0 -Pump to Trickling Filter 1968 NOD - 1,500 Bay Park nwod STP --- Jamaica Bay, Trickling Rate 1963 BOD . 85 BODu 6,250 2.5 -Meet BPT ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~SBTrickling Pl NOD 3,760 (Design) ruiremnt (Naz.sau Co. S.D.#l) SB Tikng i 1.5 (Actual) Table 17 (cont'd) Waste Sources and Abatement Status Long Island-Atlantic Ocean (17) Design Design Plant Raw Design Status & Project Receiving Stream Treatment Year Eff. Loading Flow Abatement Waste Source Number & Classification Facilities Built -%- -#4/day- MID Requirement *** MAJOR THERMAL DISCHARGES *** CAPACITY -NW- Con-Ed - Arthur Kill --- Arthur Kill None .... -- ------ 911 654 (Actual) Con-Ed - Hudson Avenue --- East River None --......... 700 967 (Actual) Con-Ed - East River -.- East River None ---------- 513 541 <(~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~(Acctual) ! Ln Con-Ed - Waterside --- East River None --------- 596 555 -Standards for (Actual) themal discharges were approved Con-Ed - Ravenswood --- East River None -- - --------- 1828 1390 March, 1975 (Actual) Con-Ed - 74th Street --- East River None ------ 209 317 (Actual) -Requirements for Con-Ed - Astoria --- East River None -- -- --------- 1550 1363 triaxial (Actual) temperature measurements Con-Ed - Astorie, Unit 6 --- East River None --800 785 and other permit (Propose~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ad) - EathRier Noermit---So 8 (Proposed) .,........ (Proposed) requirements LIWO, Glenwood Landing --- are being LIICO - Glenvood Landing --- Hempstead Harbor None ---- --------- 381 395 contested by (Actual) dischargers; adjudicatory LILCO- Northport --- Long Island Sound None .. . -------- 1125 682 hearings (Actual) are to be held LILCO - Port Jefferson --- Port Jefferson Harbor None ---- --------- 438 375 (Actual) LILCO - Shoreham, Nuclear --- Long Island Sound None ---- --------- 820 863 (proposed) (Actual) LILCO - Far Rockaway --- Hott Basin None ---- ------- 100 82 (Actual) LIICO - E. F. Barrett --- Barnums Island None ---- --------- 380 294 Channel (Actual) 12/75 Revised 9/76 TABLE 18 EFFLUENT LIMITS FOR MUNICIPAL DISCHARGES TO EFFLUENT LIMITED WATERS - SECONDARY TREATMENT - EFFLUENT MAX. DISCHARGE CONCENTRATION MIN. REMOVAL CHARACTERISTIC 30 Day Ave. 7 Day Ave. 5-day-20�C Biochemical 30 mg/1 45 mg/1 85% Oxygen Demand Suspended 30 mg/l 45 mg/l 85% Solids pH Between the limits of 6.0 - 9.0 Fecal The geometric mean for samples collected in Coliform a period of 30 consecutive days less than 200/100 ml, and in 7 consecutive days 400/100 ml. Floating solids or visible foam None V-16 water runoff, direct rainfall, inflow of groundwater, wastewater dischargesrand benthic resuspension. Some bays are "overfertilized" and algae blooms develop. In some areas, nitrogen removal, phosphorus removal or alternate out-of-bay discharge are strategies to reduce nutrient concentrations sufficiently to allow only the more desirable plant life to establish. In other areas, grazing fauna, wave action, tidal exchange, or temperature are limiting, and nitrogen removal is not justified or even desirable. Some municipal treatment plants on Long Island recharge the ground- water through recharge basins. Nitrate build-up in groundwaters is a health hazard. Methemoglobinemia can be caused by nitrates in drinking water. It is a rare "blue baby" disease for which the U. S. Public Health Service and New York State have established a drinking water standard maximum of 45 mg/l as Nitrate (10 mg/1 as N). Also, nitrates are suspected of being carcinogenic. Most municipal recharge is in Suffolk County where nitrogen removal has been included in the newer treatment facilities. There are now some 21 facilities with nitrogen removal and another 15 are in stages of planning. Any significant recharge project on Long Island will necessarily require nitrogen removal. Nitrification-denitrification is one of several advanced waste treatment methods for nitrogen removal. Nitrogen compounds (principally urea and ammonia) are biochemically oxidized to nitrates and then biochemically reduced to free nitrogen gas. Partial nitrogen removal through the removal of ammonia may be accomplished by ammonia stripping or breakpoint chlorination. Ammonia stripping releases free ammonia gas to the air through a raised pH and aeration. The addition of chlorine in breakpoint chlorination results in the release of nitrogen gas and the formation of hydrochloric acid. V-17 Both of these processes are temperature dependent and are very ineffi= cient at low temperatures. Algae harvesting and aqua culture are biochemical processes which transform dissolved nitrogen compounds into living bio-mass, which is physically removed from the system. With appropriate soil conditions and vegetation, irrigation and groundwater recharge through controlled land application can effectively remove nitrogen. Electrodialysis, distillation, reverse osmosis and ion exchange are additional methods for nitrogen removal. Septic tanks with leach fields and cesspools allow recharge without nitrogen removal. The effluents contain about 40-95 mg/i total nitrogen which is 4 to 10 times the drinking water standard. Most of this is oxidized to nitrate nitrogen, very little is lost to the atmosphere, absorbed by the soil, or used by plants. Septic systems in rural areas are of little effect on groundwater, as infiltration of precipitation is locally a dominant source of recharge. In suburban-urban areas, septic systems do have an effect. Problems of nitrate build-ups and surface well closures are attributed to septic systems. Chapter VIII provides more on groundwater. V.1.b. Industrial Discharges Industrial discharges may be sanitary wastes, process wastes, cooling water or a combination of these. Sanitary wastes are similar to domestic wastes or municipal wastes and are usually given secondary treatment or sent to a municipal system. Cooling water from condensers, boiler blowdown or air conditioning or refrigerator condensers are heated wastes. They do not, or-should not, contain pollutants and are generally not sent to municipal systems. They are discharged or cooled and then discharged at the site. Cooling V-18 water discharges are thermal discharges (q.v.). Process wastes may be high in biochemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, bacterial counts, toxic chemicals, dyestuffs, floating debris, heavy metals, oil or grease, etc. Process wastes may also be sent to a municipal system, but they frequently must be given special treatment at the industry, so that the waste will be compatible with the municipal treatment. Without this pretreatment, some process wastes would "upset" or overload the municipal treatement plant, others would not be adequately treated by a municipal process. Some process wastes require only pH adjustment, or sedimentation and are simply treated at the site. Effluent limits for industrial waste discharges, which parallel secondary treatment for municipal waste discharges, have been established by EPA and termed "Best Practical Control Technology Currently Available" (BPCTCA or BPT). Industries are required to provide BPT by July 1977. Effluent limits more stringent than BPT may be required in water quality limited waters. Effluent limits for industries are included in NPDES/SPDES permits. Where treatment is inadequate, or in-plant modifications will be needed to meet BPT effluent limits, schedules of compliance are also included within the permits. These permits are on file with NYS DEC and US EPA. Copies are available to anyone for inspection. As with municipal discharges, locations and details are provided in Appendix D, Section V.2.b., Table 17 and Figures 10,11 and 12. V.l.c. Combined Sewers Combined sewers exist in New York City and Westchester County (Nassau and Suffolk counties have separate sanitary and storm sewer systems exclusively). During periods of heavy rainfall, treatment plants and parts of the combined sewer collection systems become hydraul- V-19 ically overloaded and overflows or bypasses of untreated sewage result. Some overflow points presently discharge even in dry weather. After correction of the relatively few dry weather overflows, there will still be over 300 overflow points in need of abatement. TABLE 19 COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS AREA NO. AREA NO. Port Richmond 8 Wards Island 71 Owls Head 19 Bowery Bay 40 Coney Island 3 Hunts Point 24 26th Ward 3 Tallmans Island 16 Jamaica 3 Blind Brook 2 Rockaway 27 Mamaroneck 3 Red Hook 33 New Rochelle 3 Newton Creek 74 TOTAL 331 Combined sewer overflows are commonly high in suspended and settle- able solids, fecal coliform and debris. In some cases overflows may be high in BOD, heavy metals, nutrients, toxic chemicals, or oil and grease. The frequency of occurrence, volume discharged and strength of discharge vary from overflow to overflow. Some overflows presently discharge even in dry weather. The strength of an overflow is largely dependent on the "first flush" phonemonon. The first volumes of runoff tend to clean the streets and scour sediments from sewers and are thus of higher pollutant concentration than subsequent runoff volumes. Similarly, a storm after a dry spell is likely to cause a stronger overflow than a storm following wet weather. V-20 Combined sewer overflows cannot be effectively treated by standard secondary treatment systems--flow rates and pollutant concentrations are too sporadic. Storage and partial treatment at overflow points is possible, but it is generally more economical and effective to modify the sewer system so as to contain flows, especially first flush flows, f or subsequent treatment at the main plant. Effluent limits have not yet been imposed on combined sewer over- flows, as the approach is to reduce the occurrence and strengths of overflows before resorting to overflow treatment or storage. General interim requirements are that the treatment plant and sewer system must be operated to minimize discharges from combined sewer overflows and bypasses, and that no new sources of inflow shall be connected to any separate sanitary sewers in the collection system. Additionally, over- flows are to be monitored, and the system is to be studied with the objective of developing plans to reduce overflows through the elimination of inflow, the installation, repair, or modification of regulators, the increase in capacities of sewers and pump stations and temporary storage within or outside of the sewers. V.l.d. Thermal Discharges Thermal discharges have been considered separately from other industrial discharges. The major thermal discharges within the planning area are the condenser cooling water discharges from the 14 electric power generating stations. The metabolic rates of fish and other fauna and flora are affected by temperature and temperature changes. Dissolved oxygen saturation and BOD oxidation rates are also temperature dependent. Thermal discharges have "near field" and "far field" effects. Effluent limits emphasize conditions in the immediate area of the thermal v-2 1 discharge. This is where temperature changes are largest. A temperature prediction model of Long Island Sound was developed by Stone and Webster Engineering Company. This model predicted that existing and proposed power plant discharges would cause a maximum (both in season and depth) temperature difference of 0.25�F or less throughout most of the Sound, and up to 10F in areas of the western Sound. The seasonal range of temperature is roughly 32�F to 73�F in the western Sound. These results reinforce the premise that "near field" effects have control over "far field" effects. Cooling towers are an alternate to once-through cooling, but are not necessarily superior. These towers may be 600 feet high, create noise, or cause fog and precipitation. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires the development of environmental impact statements prior to the construction of new power plants, or major modification of existing plants. These statements are based on biological and water quality surveys, power needs, aesthetics, etc. Adverse environmental effects must be considered to be minimal or construction will be prohibited. In addition to NEPA requirements, Article VIII of the NYS Public Service Law has required, since 1972, that extensive studies and several public hearings be held prior to construction of new power plants. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has additional requirements and reviews for atomic power plants. All power plants which discharge heated wastewater are required to have SPDES/NPDES permits. V.l.e. Oil and Grease Federal and State laws prohibit discharges of oil in harmful quanti- ties and require that spills be reported day or night to NYS-DEC (518- 457-7362), US EPA (201-548-8730) or USGS (800-424-8802). In accord V-22 with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan, spills in coastal waters should be reported to the Coast Guard and spills in inland waters to EPA. Rapid initiation of emergency contaminant and cleanup is important. Primary responsibility for cleanup of spillage is placed on the discharger and, in addition, the Coast Guard and EPA have access to a revolving contingency fund for cleanup of oil spills into surface waters where responsibility cannot be immediately determined. Bulk storage rules and regulations for non-transportation related facilities have been administered by US EPA Since 1974. Bulk handlers and users of oil are required by US EPA to have and implement spill prevention, control and countermeasures (SPCC) plans. These plans identify effective methods, procedures and equipment requirements. As a minimum, onshore facilities must be provided with contaminant and/or diversionary structures or equipment such as the placement of dikes * ~~around storage areas to contain oil in the case of a tank failure. Floating booms or fences that can be deployed to keep oil from spreading and oil-water separation pumps are required for offshore facilities. Coast Guard regulations govern oil transfer operations from vessels to onshore terminals and to offshore terminals within the 12-mile limit. Facility operators must submit operation manuals which describe the duties and responsibilities of operations personnel in conducting transfer operations and the procedures and means to be used in meeting operating rules and equipment requirements. Contingency plans for reporting and containing oil discharges, two-way communications between the facility and vessel and lighting are some of the equipment requirements. Harbor authorities and local governments also have controls over vessels and transfer operations. V-23 While efforts to prevent and mitigate spillage of oil to surface waters are being actively pursued, response to groundwater spills rests solely with the State without benefit of Federal contingency funds or clearcut policy on removal of contaminants. The complexity of ground- water systems and-substantial lack of proven methods to assess and miti- gate groundwater damage has limited spill response to essentially defensive measures, such as closing well supplies, evacuation of fume- contaminated buildings, etc. DEC is, however, gradually developing expertise in investigating and controlling underground spills which will be invaluable to protection of the critical groundwater supplies of Long Island. While many measures have been taken to insure against oil, spills, accidents do happen. Additional precautions and restrictions will continue to be developed. V.l.f. Dredge Spoil and Sewage Sludge Disposal Dredge spoil and sewage sludge disposal can cause pollution problems. Until about four years ago, there were 19 defined dumping grounds in Long Island Sound (New York, Connecticut and Rhode Island waters). As a result of interstate activities, the number of dumping sites has been limited to five in number and severely limited in usage. The Bridgeport site is used exclusively for non-polluted spoil. The New London site is being used for spoils of the Thames River Dredging Project. The Eaton's Neck, New Haven and Cornfield Shoals sites are being studied and considered for limited usage. Sewage sludge must be disposed of through incineration, ocean dumping or land disposal. Sewage sludge cannot be dumped in area waters. The pollution effects of dredging and dredge spoil dumping are not- well known. It appears evident that dredging of sediments containing trapped V-24 EING CONSIDERED FOR LM~ITED USE NIA~TI NON BE~~~~ING CONFIELD POLLUTED SUIDSOL DEGE SPOIL WHV 4 - - BRIDGE~~~~~~~~~~~~PORT HRO \WESTCHESTER SOUTHPOET 2~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ORD JERSEY NASS U= DREDGE SPOIL ~~8ROOKLYN ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UN DUMPING GROUNDS ISLA 1) ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ATLANTIC OCEAN -L.I. SOUND s ~~~~~LEGEND PLANNING AREA (17) EATONS NECK L ~~~~~~~INACTIVE ' SCALE MILE~t AREAS WITHIN~~~~~~~~ RESIRICTED USE. UNDjER STUOV OR ,JL 3 E E ? ~~BEIN(; CONSIDEREV FCR LhIIIED L-SE. 75, 14' 13 72MOTU I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~POINT 41.~~~~~~~~~~IILN ISLAND SOUND LONG ISLAND 'm-- ROCKWAYGE N A' DREDGEDASNY RCAA ON IRUBBLE IDEBRIS 40 ~~~NEW JERSEY BGTAE I IDERELIT 200 100~~~~~~~~0 CONTOURS \A.~~~/~BIGHT LIIT62 10~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 .0 .0 ....CA COTUS LIII ETERS KILOMETERS~ WASTES MILES (STATUTE) DUMPl. S.I TE: -NAUTICAL MILES NEW YORK BIGHT DUMPING GROUNDS ATLANTIC OCEAN - L.I. SOUND PLANNING; AREA (17) Figure 14 V-26 pollutants will allow pollutants to some degree to reenter the waters at the dredge site and the dump site, and that dumping in excess of a certain rate adversely affects the environment at the dump site, but to what extent is not known. Eatons Neck is one of four dump sites in the nation studied by the Corps of Engineers in the Aquatic Disposal Research Project. The distribution of sediments a-ad the distribution of currents affecting sediment erosion, transport and deposition within the site have been determined by the Department of Geology and Geophysics at Yale. The baseline water quality and sediment physiochemistry of the site and adjacent reference area have been determined by the Marine Science Research Center at Stony Brook. The baseline spatial and temporal distribution patterns of planktonic, nektonic and benthic communities within the site, the reference area and the area surrounding the dump site were determined by the New York Ocean Science Laboratory in Montauk. The controlled dumping of dredge spoil within the Eatons Neck site was expected to indicate the extent to which dumping could be permitted at this and other sights. Public opposition has caused cancellation of this study. The Bridgeport site is being used for disposal of non-polluted spoil, such as dredged from marinas; the New London site is being used for spoil from the Thames River and is being considered for use by the Coast Guard and by General Dynamics Electric Boat Division; the Cornfield Shoals site is under consideration for use for non-polluted spoil, and the New Haven site is being studied, but in less detail than the Eatons Neck site. V-27 Under Section 404 of FL 92-500, the Army Corps of Engineers has primary responsibility for regulation of the discharge of dredged or fill materials into defined areas of navigable waters. Permits may be issued only after notice and opportunities for public hearings. U.S. EPA is authorized to define new dumping grounds or to prohibit dumping in defined areas, and is in the process of developing standards for dredged material quality. Significant projects, under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, are required to develop Environmental Impact Statements. New York State., under the Protection of Waters Act, Article 15, NYS Environmental Conservation Law, requires permits for dredging or dumping. These permits require review and legal public notification. States also have a certification responsibility in federal permit processes. Tidal wetlands permits under Article 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law and the State Environmental Quality Review Act are also controls on dredging and disposal. Dredging is required to maintain navigation depths. Moratoriums and restrictions have delayed projects, but not eliminated the demand. As mentioned, efforts are being made to determine the extent to which dredged material may be disposed of with minimum adverse environmental impact. New York and Connecticut are in the process of developing a Dredged Materials Interim Management Plan to provide regional guidance in enhancing -federal regulation and investigatory procedures. Bordering the planning area, the New York Bight is an area of the Atlantic Ocean off the Coasts of New York and New Jersey. As shown in Figure 14, there are currently five dump sites located within th apex of the Bight, and a sixth sight for chemical wastes is located on the edge of the continental shelf just outside the Bight limits. V-28 New York City, Nassau County, Westchester County, the City of Long Beach, West Long Beach SD, and the City of Glen Cove, along with 6 municipal and 6 biological industrial treatment plants in New Jersey have Interim Permits for ocean dumping of sewage sludge at the site. An average of 403 million cubic yards per year was dumped between 1960 and 1975. EPA's stated goal is to implement environmentally acceptable alternatives to ocean dumping of all sewage sludge in the Bight by 1981, where environmentally,. technically, and economically feasible. Schedules have been established for phasing out sludge dumping by three industries by 1977. Middletown, N.J., Glen Cove and West Long Beach are to begin incineration of sewage sludge as are Westchester and Nassau Counties. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorized through the Inter-State Sanitation Commission (ISC) a study of possible alternatives to ocean disposal, which is the principal method of sludge disposal now employed in the NYC area. EPA and ISC formulated a three-phase program, referred to as the "Sludge Program!' to develop a coordinated system for the New York and North Jersey Metropolitan Area. Phase I - a technical examination of applicable alternative methods for sludge processing and disposal. Phase 2 - evaluation of the feasible alternatives identified in Phase 1. Phase 3 - examination of legal and institutional aspects of a regional sludge management program. That work is being separately conducted by the ISC. In June, 1974, ISC engaged Camp Dresser and McKee to conduct the Phase I study to: v-29 1. Define the problem in terms of present and future quantities and properties of sludge produced in the study area. The sources in- clude all municipal plants in the area, including those disposing of sludge by methods other than ocean dumping. 2. Identify how each public wastewater treatment system in the area now disposes of its sludge. 3. Identify feasible alternatives. 4. Compare these alternatives. Factors to be considered include envir- onmental impact, energy conservation, technical feasibility, conven- ience, and cost for collection, treatment, transportation, and dis- posal as waste or unable products. 5. Recommend A limited number of alternatives for in-depth investigation in Phase 2. The Phase I Study was completed in June of 1975 and recommended further study of the following alternatives: 1. Incineration or pyrolysis with Solid Wastes. 2. Land application of limited quantities. 3. Drying and composting for Use on Land. 4. Siting and transportation. The Phase 2 technical report was issued in June, 1976 and recommends a number of:- regional pyrolysis plants for sludges produced in the treatment plants within the highly urbanized portion of the study area and the land appli- cation or composting of sludges produced by treatment plants in outlying areas. Phase 3 of the Sludge Study covering the legal and institutional con- straints is being prepared by ISC and is due out by the end of November, 1976. V-30 In light of present study being conducted by the.ISC concerning alter- natives to ocean disposal of sewage sludge the 208 studies for Nassau-Suffolk, N.Y.C. and Westchester are not emphasizing sludge disposal studies.. The alter- natives of continued barging to the N.Y. Bight or some other sight will not be investigated since EPA has issued ocean dumping permits which require that al- ternative means of sewage sludge disposal be developed and implemented by De- cember, 1981. A special condition in each permit establishes the following. interim deadlines which are eligible for 75% Federal funding under PL 92-500: Step I - Facility Planning Submit Application for funding 10/1/76 Start Planning and EAS 12/31/76 Complete plan 12-31-77 Step II - Plans and Specifications Submit Application for funding 2/15/78 Start 7/1/78 Complete plans and specifications 6/30/79 Step III - Construction Submit Application for funding 7/31/79 Start Construction 12/31/79 Start-up 12/31/81 The 208 studies will concentrate their efforts on the investigation of alternatives to ocean dumping and will rely heavily on the final DEC report and ongoing 201 facility plans for guidance in developing and evaluating these al- ternatives. v-31 In mid-June, 1976 materials associated with human activities such as garbage, tar ball, grease balls and other floatable materials began washing up on the beaches of Southern Long Island. Several beaches were closed, in- cluding those at Robert Moses State Park and Jones Beach, for approximately one week. The decision to close these beaches was based on the potential health hazard implied by the nature of the materials deposited on the shores. Materials observed along the beaches were "floatables" consisting of flotsam, grease balls, tar/oil balls, burnt wood debris, papers, fabrics, chicken heads, hair, vegetables, cigarette and cigar tips, and other human items of plastic or rubber composition. This problem on Long Island's bathing beaches gives dramatic publicity to a problem which has existed for decades to varying degrees. However, incidents in June of 1976 were magnified due to several important factors: 1. the "creeping sludge" concept from the New York Bight. 2. New York City raw sewage and combined sewer discharges. 3. formation of a persistent and dominant southerly wind flow pattern. 4. barge dumping in the New York Bight. 5. unusual accidents such as oil spills and Nassau County's Bay Park sludge holding tank explosion on June 2, 1976. V-32 All of these coincided to create the abnormal situation encountered. As a result, concerned federal, state and local officials closed down the various beaches within their respective jurisdictions until water quality testing and debris cleanup operations could be completed. Analyses of the materials collected from the area by the U.S. Coast Guard revealed that, by far, the major components (over 90% by volume) were wood (60-95%) seaweed (4-17%), and normal beach litter (4-20%). Sewage related plastic debris (7%) were collected only from beaches east of Robert Moses State Park beaches. Sewage and petroleum-related debris were collected from Jones Beach (1%) and beaches east of Robert Moser (3%). Probable sources of pollutants include:-., 1. Dredge Spoils - Approximately 11 million cubic yards of dredge materials per year are dumped at a site five miles from the nearest shore line in the New York Bight. It is estimated that dredge spoil dumping contributes 38% of the total input of oil and grease to the Bight. 2. Sewage Sludge - Barge dumping of sewage sludge into the Bight at the 12 mile sight accounts for approximately 3% of the total'oil and grease discharged to the Bight. 3. Urban Runoff - Combined and stormwater runoff from New York - New Jersey metropolitan area contributes an estimated 31% of the oil and grease discharged to the Bight. 4. Municipal Wastewater - Untreated and treated sanitary sewage from New York and New Jersey accounts for another 20% of'the oil and grease discharged to the New York Bight. V-33 5. Water Quality Accidents - During May, June and July, 1976- various incidents of oil and hazardous material spills occurred including the explosion at Nassau County's Bay Park STP sludge facilities. 6. Municipal Solid Waste Disposal - The possibility of windblown material from open barges and refuse in barge ships entering the water system and the possibility of short dumps. 7. Mobile Marine Sources - Garbage, debris, oil and grease are- contributed by pleasure craft, freighters and tankers. All of the above sources, activities and incidents occurred during meteorological conditions which were unusually persisent for early summer. Wind directions were from the south to southwest 86% of the time with wind speeds greater than 5 MPH 94% of the time. The persistent and strong wind pattern contributed significantly to the transport of unusually large amounts of floatable debris and other pollutants toward.the south shores of Long Island. This meteorological condition, abornmal because of its persistence and strength, coupled with various sources listed previously combined to create the unique intensity of beach wash-up materials. V.l.g. Vessel Wastes Vessel wastes include the discharge of oily bilge water, sanitary V-34 discharges from heads, and discharges of debris. Section 33-c of the Navigation Law of New York State of 1966 prohibited or restricted discharges of wastes and debris. The Law became effective in 1970. Parts 656 and 657 of the Environmental Conservation Law established effluent standards to marine toilets and standards for marine toilet ce rtification. To date, 49 models of holding tanks and 26 models of recirculating assemblies are the only approved equipment. No flow through devices yet developed are expected to meet the standards. While it is expected that certain incinerating devices could be approved, none have been submitted for certification. Public Law 91-224 of April 3, 1970 and Public Law 92-500 of 1972, provided for development of no-discharge requirements on a national basis. Since many areas do not have sufficient pumpout facilities, flow through treatment systems such as macerator-chlorinator installa- tions are being permitted on an interim basis. Treatment systems certified during this interim period will continue to be acceptable even after no-discharge requirements become fully effective. This Federal Law supersede the New York State restrictions on all navigable waters, except Lake George. Figure 11 and Table 14 give the locations of sewage pumpout facilities. As indicated on the Table, copies of this information are available at Environmental Conservation, Health, and State Parks Commis- sion offices. Additional facilities are expected to be constructed at private marinas. Construction of facilities at new municipal treatment plants may make them eligible for 87-2 percent construction aid. Prime public sites include Glen Cove, Long Beach, West Long Beach, Northport, Ocean Beach, Sag Harbor, New Rochelle, Port Chester, Hither Hills S. P., Montauk Point S.P., and Orient Beach S.P. v-3-5 -0 ains d. isle, c SEWAGE' PUMP-OUT FACILITIES Cii lfic Roch d.10 Lib-ty T S Si EFFECTIVE JUNE 1 1975 o Pleasant WA VA# 0 no, V., L L WATERCRAFT POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM c PC- Plas NEW YORK STATE 8 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERY14TION T NMI. kill mi Soul SCALE OF MILES 06 T M cast Pbt 1-i 91 w G.Shi 10 5 0 10 20 cl buy W-ick EST B df 12 2 1;71 132 6 12 133 son 1 2 83 No 2 Sca 127 304 103 152 lie Sowhamp city*( M 128 01 ton Ste Bay I 0136 10 154 NEW YORK C I 1 140 37 Ma.h.itan(80,91 14 4 FLOW. LI 39 FIGU 5 Beach TABLE 20 SEWAGE PUMP-OUT FACILITIES The following locations of pumpout facilities for boat tollets correspond to the 129. Shinnecock Canal Marina, Shinnecock Canal, Southampton (T) map on the opposite side. The map is divided Into counties and towns; town names 130. Maidstone Marina, 3 Mile Harbor Road, East Hampton CT) being designated by CT). These facilities are available for use by the general 131. Three Mile Harbor Boat Yard, 3 Mile Harbor Road, East Hampton CT) boating public. Additional Information, and copies of this map are available at 132. Deep Sed Marina, Star Island Lake, Montauk, East Hampton (T) the following offices: 133. Montauk Marina Basin, W. Lake Drive, Montauk, East Hampton IT) 134. Great Gun Beach Marina. Fire Island, Brookhaven CT) Department of Environmental Conservation 135. Forge River Boat Basin, Brookhaven CT) Region 1 - Bldg. 40, SUNIY, Stony Brook, NY 11790 136. Dockside 500, Colonial Drive, E. Patchogue, Brookhaven CT) Region 2 - 2 World Trade Center, 61st floor, Iew York, HY 10047 137. Sandspit Marina, Brookhaven CT) Region 3 - 21 South Putt Corners Road. New Paltz, NY 12561 138. Blue Point Marina, Brookhaven (T) 139. Davis Park. Fire Island, Brookhaven (T) Bureau of Sewage Programs, Special Projects Section, 50 Wolf Rd., Albany,NY 12233 140. Corey Creek Marina, Brookhaven (T) 141. Sailor Haven, Fire Island, Islip (T) County Health Departments 142. Watch Hill, Fire Island. Brookhaven (T) Dutchess, liassau, Rockland, Suffolk, Ulster & Westchester; New York City 143. Oakdale Yacht Service, Oakdale, silp CT) 144. Bay Shore Marina Basin, S. Clinton Ave., Bay Shore. Islip CT) State Park Commissions 145. Captree State Park, Moses & Ocean Pkwys, Babylon, Islip (T) (516-669-0449) Taconic, Staatsburg, NY 12580 --- Palisades, Bear Mt., IIY 10911 146. Land's End Marina, Sayville, Islip (T) Longlstand, Babylon, fNY 11702 147. Robert Moses State Park. Robert Hoses Pkwy., Babylon. Islip CT) (516-669-0449) 148. Pete Newins, 121 Maple Avenue. Bay Shore, Islip CT) Dutchess County - Region 3 149. Timber Point County Park, Islip (T), 2 facilities 305. T.L. Ilorrte State Park, Rt. 9, Hyde Park CT) (914-889-4646) 150. Knutson's Marina. Mill Dam Road, Huntington CT) 306. Poughkeepsie Yacht Club, Hyde Park CT) 151. Halesite Marina, Huntington Harbor, Huntington {T) 152. Milldam Marina, Mill Dame Road. Huntington CT) Nassau County - Region 1 153. Anchoraqe Marina, E. Shore Rd., Lindenhurst, Babylon CT) 100. Aqua Marine Associates. Inc.. 55 Hudson Ave., Freeport, Hempstead CT) 154. Babylon Yacht Marina, Lindenhurst, Babylon CT) 101. Glen Cove Yacht Service, 88 Shore Rd., Glen Cove, Oyster Bay (T) 155. Babylon Yacht Marina, 415 Fire sland Ave., Babylon.(T) 102. Island Bay Marina, 2920 Island Channel Rd., Seaford, Hempstead T) 156. Pebler's Marina, 710 S. Wellwood Ave., Lindenhurst, Babylon CT) 103. Poosevelt IMemrial Park, 58 Ma'ln St., Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay (T 157. Rutherig Marina, Lindenhurst. Babylon CT) 104. Tappen Beach Marina, Shore Rd. & Tappen Beach, Glenwood Landing, Oyster Bay CT) 105. Tobay Beach, South Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay CT) Westchester County - Region 3 IC6. Wantagh Park County Marina, Wantagh Pkwy. & Merrick Rd., Hempstead CT) 301. NicholsYacht Yards, Inc., Mamaroneck (V). by appointment (OWB-6065) 107. Schatz Bros. Boatyard, Gordon Place, Freeport, Hempstead CT) 302. Mamaroneck Boat & Motor, Mamaroneck CV) (5C8-2700) 108. Rest End Beach Marina, Jones Beach State Park, Wantagh. Hempstead CT) 303. Municipal Marina. New Rochelle City, by appointment (NE2-2032) 109. Treasure Island 'Marina, 2880 Ocean Ave., Seaford, Hempstead CT) 304. Tide Mill Yacht Basin, Rye (T) (W07-2995) 110. Al Grover's Hi & Dry Marina, 500 S. Main St., Freeport, Hempstead (T) 111. Sacken's Boatyard, 5 R.R. Place, Island Park, Hempstead (T) Connecticut Ul. Stamford Landing Yacht Corp., Stamford, Conn. flew York City - Region 2 02. Clinton Harbor, Clinton, Conn. 200. Minneford Boat Yard, City Island, Bronx (885-2000) 03. Mianus Marine Corp., Cos Cob, Conn. 201. World's Fair Marina, Flushing, Queens (898-6300) 04. Black Swan Marina, Old Saybrook, Conn. 202. Great Kills Boat Yard, Staten Island, Richmond (984-6716) 05. Rex Marina, S. Norwalk, Conn. 06. Slen Moor Marine, Mystic, Conn. Suffolk Countv - Region 1 07. Harbor Marine Center. Cos Cob, Conn. 116. WoodbTne Marina, ,orthport Harbor, Huntington (T) 117. Long Beach Marina, Long Beach Road, Smithtown CT) 118. Nissequoque Yacht Club, Jericho Turnpike, Smithtown CT) 119. Little Africa Town Park, Ilissequoque; Smithtown CT) 120. Port Jefferson Marina, Port Jefferson Harbor, Brookhaven CT) 121. Cedar Beach Marina, Mt. Sinai Harbor, Brookhaven CT) 122. Orient by the Sea Marina, Mair Road, Southold CT) 123. MFtchel's Sea Resort, Front St., Greenport, Southold CT) 124. North Folk Shipyard, Inc., Main St., New Suffolk, Southold CT) 125. Dering Harbor Marina, Oering Harbor, Shelter Island CT) 126. Coecles Harbor Marina, Coecles Harbor, Shelter Island CT) 127. Baron's Cove Marina, . Water Rd., Sag Harbor, Southampton IT) 128. Seatuck Cove Marina, South Bay Ave., Eastport, Southampton T There is not an overabundance of pumpout facilities in New York State, but there are presently enough facilities in New York and adjoining states to effectively maintain the existing New York State no-discharge laws. Efforts are being made to continue New York State's prohibition of macerator-chlorinators which do not meet approved New York State standards. Discharges of untreated or inadequately treated sewage from vessels do not commonly cause a widespread pollution problem. Pollution is through discharge of visible clumped material in harbors near shore or near bathing waters or the discharge of inadequately disinfected wastes near shellfish areas, bathing waters or Class "A" waters. There are some 25,000 New York State registered boats in the metropolitan area and numerous transient craft that have heads, many of which are unsatis- factorily equipped. V.l.h. Duck Farms Duck farms have been a pollution problem in Suffolk County for many years. The wastes generated in duck production are typically high in suspended solids, oxygen demanding organics, ammonia, nitrogen, phosphorus and coliforms. These wastes have caused sludge deposits in streams and bays, violations of DO and ammonia standards, and have caused or contri- buted to the closing of shellfishing areas. Nitrogen and phosphorus in combination with poor exchange of bay and ocean waters is considered to have caused undesirable algae blooms. Separation of duck pens from streams and ponds was accomplished around 1965 by the placement of dikes or barriers. Aerated lagoons, settling lagoons and chlorination were typical treatment systems installed by 1968. In 1972, effluent requirements of 50 mg/l BOD5, 50 mg/I SS, and total coliform of 70 MPN/100 ml were standardized for V-38 all duck farm effluents. With proper operation and maintenance, these limits can be obtained. To adequately treat these duck farm wastes, extraordinary treatment, including nitrogen removal, would be needed. The 1983 effluent limita- tions for "Best Available Technology Economically Achievable" (BAT) for duck farms are zero discharge of process wastes and containment of process wastes and runoff from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall. Rather than require installment of advance waste treatment facilities which would be obsolete in 1983, it is more economical to convert to dry farming directly. V.l.i. Radiological Wastes Radiological wastes could derive from hospitals, research labs or atomic power plants. The use of radioactive materials is stringently controlled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Discharge limits set by the NRC, EPA and NYS are also stringent. Accidents during transport and storage, or catastrophies such as crashes, explosions or fires involving radioactive materials are rare, but these pose more danger of radiological pollution than the very limited amounts of radioactive materials tolerated in discharges. V.1.4. Non-Point Sources Non-point sources of pollution result from activities of man which have adverse effects on groundwater or in-stream -water quality and which do not have point discharges to a stream or other body of water. They result from man's use or disturbance of the land, air or adjacent waters. Non-point pollutants can enter the waters of the planning area as: -- Sediment from construction sites, mining sites, cropland, suburban and urban areas. V-39 -- Nutrients from cropland, pastures, feed lots, suburban and urban area. -- Pathogens and toxic chemicals from feed lots, croplands, suburban and urban areas (both overland and underground flows). -- Pestcides. -- Oxygen demanding organics from fields, forests, agricultural wastes suburban and urban runoff. -- Salt, oil, heavy metals, etc. from roadways, airports and parking lots. -- Oil, nutrients, sediment, etc. from rainfall. -- Organics, nutrients, heavy metals from resuspension of benthic deposits. -- Various pollutants from the inflow from adjoining waters. -- Leachates from landfills. Non-point source control is in its infancy. It is known that oil is washed from roadways, that shellfish areas near urban and suburban areas must be closed as a result of high bacterial counts after rain- falls and that waters become debris filled from storms, but what measures can be taken that will be cost-effective? "Buffer zones" of vegetation between urban development and waterways; diversion, collection and treatment of stormwater; use of pervious pavements; improvement of air quality; placement of membranes under landfills; and control of runoff at construction sites are some of the many ways to combat non-point source pollution. The 208 studies are to provide assessment and cost effective recommendations on non-point sources. V-40 V.2. Inventories and Descriptions Appendix D contains a listing of over 500 industries, municipalities, institutions, etc. that have been identified as dischargers to waters of the planning area. Various Tables and Figures provide details on about 80 of these dischargers. The remaining discharges are comparatively small and will not have significant impact on water quality. Descriptions of major municipal and industrial discharges are followed by descriptions of power plants. Point discharges may be located on Figures 10, 11 and 12. V.2.a. Municipal and Industrial Discharges I. New York Bays - Arthur Kill - Kill Van Kull 1. Nassau Smelting and Refining Company, Inc. is located at 286 Richmond Valley Road, Tottenville. The company discharges .331 MGD of waste, treated through chemical addition and precipitation, to Mill Creek (Class I), a tributary of the Arthur Kill (Class I). Plans are to discharge sanitary wastes to the Oakwood Beach system when possible and continue present treatment. 2. The Port Richmond Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Richmond Terrace and Bodine Street, Richmond. The primary treatment plant is designed for an average daily flow of 10 MGD, but is overloaded and currently discharges 17.1 MGD. The outfall is located on the Kill Van Kull east of the plant at U. S. Bulkhead (Class II). The plant will serve the northern 1/3 of Staten Island, including the Sun Oil Corporation and the Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing Company. Plant expansion to 60 MGD, upgrading to the step aeration process and placement of interceptors are under construction. Eight wet weather overflows exist. V-41 3. Sucrest Corporation, located at 280 Richards Street, Brooklyn, is a manufacturer of refined liquid and crystalline sugar from 1000 tons/day of raw sugar cane. The industry has several separate discharges, all to Erie Basin (Class I) in the vicinity of the plant. The major source of flow is from 4 outfalls (#I007, #009, #020 and #021) which discharge 9.65 MGD of wastwater which is primarily barometric condenser cooling water. Plans are to connect to Red Hook for treat- ment of process wastes (which are high in BOD and TSS), but to continue Erie Basin discharge of cooling waters. 4. Bush Terminal leases loft buildings to approximately 130 tenants. These tenants' activities include plastics molding, metal plating, food packing and the manufacture of flavors and fragrances. There are two discharges: #001 is 0.02 MGD to Gowanus Bay (Class I) at the south end of the 31st Street Pier and #002 is 0.943 MGD to Gowanus Bay at the Slip. 5. The Owls Head Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Bay Ridge Avenue and Narrows Avenue, Brooklyn. The treatment plant is designed for an average daily flow of 160 MGD and currently discharges with modified aeration, 99 MGD to the Upper New York Bay (Class I). Industries discharging to the system include: Metal Fabricating or Finishing Companies French, Rhoda, Marino Polishing and Plating, Inc. Custom Plating Company Barrett Plating and Polishing Company S'Electro Plating Company, Inc. Roger's Silversmith, Inc. Coney Island Electro Plating Works, Inc. Lincoln Metal Products Corporation Aetnacraft Industries, Inc. Demarlo Electro Plating Company J.F.D. Electronics Corporation English Silver Manufacturing Corporation Baltio Finishing Corporation Greco Manufacturing Corporation Delizza and Elster, Inc. Halcolitr Company, Inc. Plans are to upgrade treatment and place interceptors. Facilities plans for this project have not been completed, but it is likely that plant capacity may be reduced to around 135 MGD. There are 19 combined sewer overflows. 6. The Oakwood Beach Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Emmet Avenue and Mill Road, Richmond. The treatment plant is designed for an average daily flow of 16 MGD, but is overloaded and currently discharges 19.1 MGD. The outfall is to the Lower New York Bay (Class SB). Expansion to 40 MGD, upgrading from modified aeration to step aeration, placement of interceptors, and a new outfall are under construction. Projects for addition of interceptors have statewide priorities of 12 and 13. Bypass and five raw discharges will be eliminated. Sludge is to be pumped to Port Richmond for treatment. II. East River - Harlem River 1. The Red Hook Water Pollution Control Plant is to be located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, with discharge to the East River (Class SD). Presently, there are 33 combined sewer discharges. The 70 MGD step aeration Red Hook plant will treat dry weather flows, but wet weather overflows will persist. This project was ranked 10, but construction has been dealyed due to New York City budget problems. Projects are ranked -37, 38, 39 and 40. The following industries will be discharging to the Red Hook System: V-43 - Metal Finishing Industries (SIC Code #3471) 1. Specified Plating and Anodizing Corporation 2. Trio Polishing Corporation 3. Alabey Polishing and Plating Corporation 4. Electrical Manufacturing Company, Inc. 5. Majestic Metal Spinning and Stamping Company, Inc. Organic Dyestuffs and Pigment for Food (SIC Code #2815) 1. H. Rohnstamm and Company, Inc. 2. The Amstar Corporation Brooklyn Cane Sugar Refinery is located at 49 South Second Street, Brooklyn. The 9.27 MGD discharge to the East River (Class SD) is located just upstream of the Williamsburg Bridge. The discharge is primarily water from barometric condensers. Sanitary and other wastes are discharged to Newtown Creek sewer system. 3. The Newton Creek Water Pollution Control Plant is located at 329-69 Greenpoint Avenue, Brooklyn. The plant is designed to treat an average flow of 310 MGD. The plant currently discharges around 340 MGD to the East River (Class SD) to an area about 440 feet past the bulkhead line. An alternate outfall for treated effluent is to the head of Whale Creek (Class II). Industries which discharge to the system include: Major Contributing Industries Etco Knitgoods Processing Company Acme Dye works Royal Yarn Dyeing Corporation Cosmo Dye Works, Inc. Pfizer, Inc. Duveen Soap Corporation The Borden Chemical Company Supreme Synthetic Dyers, Inc. Lori Dye Works Reichold Chemicals, Inc. Art Plating Corporation Sicania Electroplating V-44 Globe Plating Company Jomar Metal Finishing Corporation State Pipe and Nipple Company General Instrument Corporation The Nelkin Companies Supreme Platers Regent Metal Products, Inc. Fischer Chromium Plating Company, Inc. Presto Electroplating Corporation United Metal Goods Manufacturing Company, Inc. Egyptian Polishing and Plating Works Alberts Plating Works, Inc. Chromium Plating and Polishing Company S.C. Plastic Electrofinishing Company Grant Chromium Plating Corporation Imperial Plating Company, Inc. Kings Automatic Plating Company, Inc. Structural Processing Corporation Triboro Platers, Inc. Service Plating Company Leviton Manufacturing Company Berkman Brothers Republic Steel Corporation G.M.C. Process Spectranome Plating Company, Inc. Standard Plating Corporation Sun-Ray Electroplating Company Atlas Metal Products Hardchrome Electro Processing Corporation Ruebro Manufacturing Company, Inc. Industrial Electronic Hardware Corporation The Ravenware Company, Inc. Revere Copper and Brass, Inc. Columbia Meal Frame Company Ainsley Lamps, Inc. Nova Manufacturing Company Tome Silver Smiths, Inc. Duro Bronze Company National Graphics Service Silverman-shaw, Inc. T&M Electroplating and Polishing Corporation Colgate Plating Corporation Nelson Brothers Metal Ornaments, Inc. King Kaster, Inc. Bumper and Auto Processing of New York, Inc. Cohan-Epner Bay White Metal Casting Company Spray Art Finishing Corporation E. B. Stimpson Company, Inc. The Manhattan Pumping Station was placed on line in May, 1976, thus eliminating many untreated dry weather discharges from Manhattan. The plant, however, is overloaded and there are extensive I/I problems. The plant is limited in size, V-45 new modifications and treatment processes such as pure oxygen and biodiscs are being studied. Projects rank 37, 38 39 and 4. Interboro Surface Company produces approximately 1,000 tons of bituminous concrete per day. About 0.020 MGD of overflow from a dust scrubber sedimentation tank is discharged to the south bank of Newtown Creek (Class II) 500 feet west of Whale Creek. The discharge contains excessive suspended solids and iron. 5. The Phelps-Dodge Refining Corporation, Laurel Hill Refinery, is located at 42-02 - 56 Road, Queens. Secondary copper is refined and copper sulfate and basic copper sulfate are produced. There are nine discharges from the plant to Newtown Creek (Class II), three of which are via the 43rd Street municipal sewer. The remaining six are about 1,000 feet southeast of Kosciusko Bridge on the east bank. The discharge averaging 0.565 MGD contain process waste and sanitary wastes. Sanitary wastes are to be sent to the municipal system upon sewer construction. Process wastes are treated by neutralization and clarification. Cooling water is recycled through cooling towers. 6. The Pearl Wick Corporation is located at 27-50 First Street, Long Island City, Queens. The company manufactures tubular products used in the manufacture of hampers and juvenile furniture. Four discharges have been discontinued. The single remaining 0.041 MGD discharge is to the East River (Class SD) at the plant. 7. The Wards Island Water Pollution Control Plant is located on Wards Island, New York. The plant is being expanded from V-46 210 MOD to 250 MOD and upgraded from conventional aeration to step aeration. The plant presently receives 265 MGD, There are three outfalls to the East River (Class SD). The two main outfalls to the Upper East River are being replaced by a twin outfall between the existing two. The third outfall is a primary effluent bypass. Industries discharging to the system include: Textile Products (SIC Code 22) Gotham Dyeing and Finishing Metal Fabricating and Finishing (SIC Code 3471) Art Steel Company S. W. Farber Division Bronx Metal Polishing Compan3 Inc. Merit Plating Company, Inc. Okala Plating Company Ace Plating Works, Inc. Rapid Plating, Inc. Grand Silver Company, Inc. X-L Brass Company, Inc. B & D Polishing and Plating Corporation There are 71 combined sewer overflows. 8. The Bowery Bay Water Pollution Control Plant is located at 4301 Berrian Boulevard and Steinway Street, Queens. The plant is designed for treatment of 120 MGD and is being expanded to 150 MGD of step aeration. The plant presently discharges 113 MGD to Rikers Island Channel (Class SD) 1,000 feet past the bulkhead line. An emergency bypass also discharges to this area. Industries discharging to the system include: Miscellaneous Manufacturers West Chemical Products, Inc. Warner-Lambert Company Equitable Paper Bay Corporation V-47 Sny-Tex Dyers Long Island Processing Master Dye Works Marblette Corporation Metal Platers Eagle Electric Company Legion Utensus Company, Inc. Black Ox Metal Finishing Company, Inc. Anacote Corporation Defianca Button Machine Company Acme Associates, Inc. Gould-Merseru Company, Inc. Guilp Platters, Inc. Intaglio Service Corporation Admiral Plating, Inc. Brooklyn and Queens Polishing Salkover Metal Processing of New York, Inc. Eagle Metals Works, Inc. Berger Industries, Inc. Bulova Watch Company Federal Pacific Electric Company Abbro Metallics, Inc. Star Chromium Corporation Savoy Brass Manufacturing Company, Inc. Levco Metal Finishers, Inc. J. Sklar Manufacturing Company, Inc. Long Island Mechanical Plating Company Kollsman Instrument Corporation Jacoby-Bender, Inc. Peer Plating Company Matson Manufacturing Company, Inc. Rotobroil Corporation of America Monarch Barrel Plating Works, Inc. Vernon Plating Works, Inc. Waldes-Kokinoor, Inc. Continental Connector Corporation Accurate Casting Company, Inc. Slide-rite Manufacturing Corporation U. S. Optical Frame Company Plastro Metric, InC. Sil-Glo Sales Company, Inc. Pell Jewelry Company Master Metal Polishing Corporation Programatic Platers, Inc. Joseph Carruba, Jr., Inc. Eclador Int. LTD George Dietrickn and Sons Queens Plating Company, Inc. Nelson Galvanizing, Inc. Electra Color Corporation Anoca Plating Service Corporation Unit Processes Assemblies Latin Watch Case Company Wolgro Products Company V-48 Stylebuilt Accessories, Inc. Western Sealant Metal Finishing Corporation Buglecraft, Inc. LS Plate and Wire Corporation There are 40 combined sewer overflows. 9. The Hunts Point Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Coster Street and Ryawa Avenue, Bronx. The plant is being upgraded and modernized to provide 200 MGD of step aeration. Fl0s from Orchard Beach, Harts Island and City Island have been diverted to Hunts Point. The plant currently discharges 151 MGD to the East River (Class I). Industries discharging to the system include: Chemical Manufacturer (SIC 2819) Dexter Chemical Corporation Organic Chemical Manufacturer (SIC 2865) Hexagon Laboratories Textile Mill Products (SIC 22) Keystone Dyeing and Finishing, Inc. Metal Fabrication and Finishing (SIC 3471) Local Electronics Victoria Plating Company National Wire Products Stevens Plating Works Embee Plating Corporation Express Electroplating Corporation General Galvanizing and Supply, Inc. Electro-Chemical Engraving Company American Bank Note Company Eastern Rolling Mills, Inc. Audio Matrix Corporation Clarmil Anodizing Corporation Riverdale Plating Corporation U. S. Components, Inc. U. S. Metal Treating Corporation Lamo Fashion Manufacturing There are 24 combined sewer overflows. V-49 10. The Tallmans Island Water Pollution Control Plant is located at 127th Street and East River, College Point, Queens. The plant is designed for 60 MGD and is being expanded to 80 MGD and upgraded to step aeration. The plant presently discharges 61 MGD to the East River (Class I) at the bank adjacent to the plant. An emergency bypass also discharges to this area. Inadequacies in the collection/interceptor system are suspected of causing several dry weather discharges. Industries discharging to the system include: Metal Finishing and Plating (SIC 3471) Park Nameplate Company Kent Electroplating Corporation Serval Slide Fasteners, Inc. Miller Tube Corporation EDO Corporation North American Specialties Corporation Levin Fixture Corporation Styl-Rite Optics, Inc. Paramount Silversmith, Inc. There are 19 combined sewer overflows. III. Western Long Island Sound 1. The Port Chester Sewage Treatment Plant is located on Fox Island Road. The plant provides primary treatment of municipal and industrial wastes of average flow of 6.2 MGD. The 6.0 MGD design capacity plant discharges to the Byram River (Class C). Plans are to combine treatment with Blind Brook. Port Chester will provide 6.0 MGD of secondary treatment, sludge disposal service to both plants, and the Blind Brook outfall will be used. The Sound discharge will negate the need for classifying the Byram River as Water Quality Limited. Facility plans for upgrading this plant have recently been completed. The projects are ranke.� 173 and 174. V-50 2. The Blind Brook Wastewater Treatment Plant is located at 141 Oakland Beach Avenue, Rye. The system provides primary treatment for an average flow of 2.9 MGD with a plant design capacity of 5.0 MGD. Portions of the collection system are combined sewers. The principal outfall is to the Sound, about a mile offshore, at a depth of 46 feet. This is at the center of a 1 s~quare mile section of SB water, surrounded by presently closed SA waters. Wet weather flows in excess of 12 MGD are screened, chlorinated and discharged to an unnamed ditch which flows into Blind Brook. Two other wet weather discharges occur: one is from a manhole overflow to a ditch near the plant and then to Blind Brook (Class I). The other is a pump station emergency bypass to Playland Lake (Class I). Plans are to combine treatment with Port Chester to provide secondary treatment with Sound discharge. Investi- gations are to be made on reducing wet weather problems. Facility plans for upgrading this plant have recently been completed. The projects are ranked 145 and 146. 3. The Mamaroneck Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck. The system provides primary treatment for an average flow of 18.5 MGD, with a plant design capacity of only 18 MGD. The collection system is partially combined sewers. The principal discharge is to the Sound at the center of a 1 square mile section of SB water that is surrounded by presently closed SA waters. A plant bypass for wet weather flows discharges to SB waters of the East Basin of Mamaroneck Harbor. Another bypass V-51 discharges from Harbor Island to the SB waters of the West Basin of Mamaroneck Harbor. Two pump station bypasses and an overflow discharge to Larchmont Harbor. A plan of study to upgrade and expand treatment and to determine methods of reducing overflows has recently been completed. There is no facility plan and the project is not yet ranked. 4. The New Rochelle Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on LeFerve Lane, New Rochelle. The system provides treatment of an average flow of 14.5 MGD of municipal and industrial wastewater by a 15 MGD primary plant. The collection system is combined. The principal discharge is to the center of a 1 square mile section of SB water, surrounded by Water Quality Limited SA waters. Overflows and bypasses discharge to Larchmont Harbor (SB), Echo Bay (SB), Lower Hudson (SB) and Pine Brook (D). Industrial discharges include: Metal Plating Accessecraft Products Corporation Techni-Plate, Inc. A plan of study and engineering report have been completed for this project. It is ranked 10 Statewide 5. The Belgrave Water Pollution Control Plant is located at 34th Avenue and 255th Street in North Hempstead Town. The plant is a 2.0 MGD trickling filter. The plant presently treats an average daily flow of 1.5 MGD with discharge to Water Quality Limited Little Neck Bay (Class SB). V-52 6. The Village of Great Neck Sewer District Sewage Treatment Plant is located at 265 East Shore Road, Great Neck. The 1.5 MGD trickling filter discharges 1.0 MGD to Water Quality Limited Manhasset Bay (CLass SB) just offshore from the plant. 7. The Great Neck Sewer District, East Shore Road Sewage Treatment Plant is located at 236 East Shore Road, Great Neck. The plant is a 2.7 MGD trickling filter which presently discharges 2.9 MGD to Water Quality Limited Manhasset Bay (Class SB). The district serves Kensington (V), Saddle Rock (V), parts of Thomaston (V), Great Neck Plaza (V), Great Neck Estates (V), Great Neck (V), and some of the unincorporated areas of North Hempstead (T) in Great Neck and Manhasset. 8. The Port Washington Water Pollution Control District Sewage- Treatment Plant is located at 70 Harobr Road, Port Washington. The 3.0 MGD trickling filter currently discharges 3.12 MGD to Water Quality Limited Manhasset Bay (Class SB). Indus- tries discharging to the system include: Thomson Industries, Inc. Primate Imports Corporation Dependable Fastener An evaluation is to be made of the feasibility of expanding the plant or diverting flow along with flow from Roslyn and neighboring unsewered areas to the Cedar Creek plant. 9. The Roslyn Village Sewage Treatment Plant is located on Skillman Street, Roslyn. The 0.52 MGD trickling filter currently discharges 0.46 MGD to Hempstead Harbor (Class SB) at the extreme upper end of the Harobr at about mean sea V-53 level. Plans were to abandon the plant and connect to the Port Washington system via a -newly formed collection district between Roslyn and Fort Washington. Formation of the collection district has been delayed and this plan abandoned. Plans are to connect to Sewer District No. 3. 10. The City of Glen Cove Sewage Treatment Plant is located on Morris Avenue in Glen Cove. The plant is a 4.0 MGD trickling filter which presently discharges 5.2 MGD to Water Quality Limited Glen Cove Creek (Class I) adjacent to the plant. Industries discharging to the system include: Edmos, Products Corporation Photo Circuits Eastern Heat Treating and Brazing Corporation Long Island Metal Plating, Inc. Long Is land Paint and Chemical Company Slater Electric, Inc. Colubmia Ribbon and Carbon Manufacturers Pall Corporation Powers Chemco The comprehensive sewerage plan for the north shore of Nassau County calls for treatment of sewage from the future Sea Cliff-Roslyn Harbor and Brookville-Old 'Westbury sewer collection districts at the City of Glen Cove sewage treat- ment plant. In 1970, Nassau County announced its intention of forming the Sea Cliff-Roslyn Harbor collection district and requested the City of Glen Cove to provide capacity at the City sewage treatment plant to handle the sewage from the proposed collection district. In 1973, Glen Cove prepared construction plans and specifications for an activated sludge sewage treatment plant adequate to serve both the City of Glen Cove and the Sea-Cliff-Roslyn Harbor sewer collection district. In 1974, however, there was unexpected strong public opposition to the formation of v-54 the Sea Cliff-Roslyn Harbor sewer collection district, and the Nassau County Board of Supervisors postponed indefinitely the formation of the district. Thus, it became necessary for the City of Glen Cove to revise its plans and provide for construction of a smaller capacity treatment plant designed to meet the needs of the City only, with provision for expansion of the plant in the future to serve the Sea Cliff- Roslyn Harbor and Brookville-Old Westbury sewer collection districts, if and when they are formed. The present proposal is to construct an 8 MGD tertiary treatment system which will provide nitrification (i.e., oxidation of organic nitrogen and ammonia to nitrates). The projects are ranked 52 and 53. 11. The Oyster Bay Sewer District treatment facility is located on Bay Street, Oyster Bay. The 1.2 MGD trickling filter which discharges to Oyster-Bay (Class SA) near the plant is occasionally overloaded. An area around the outfall is closed to shellfishing. There are no immediate plans to expand the plant. Long range plans are to sewer surrounding areas, expand the plant and construct an outfall to Long Island Sound. Operation and maintenance will be examined with the aim of achieving required removals. Inflow/infil- tration correction could substantially reduce flow to the plant. IV. Central and Eastern Long Island Sound 1. The Huntington Sewer District Sewage Treatment Plant is located on Creek Road, Huntington. The 2.0 MGD trickling filter currently discharges 1.83 MGD to Huntington Harbor (Class SA) near Mill Creek. An alternate pump discharge is V-55 used at high tide and is located within 300 feet of the gravity outfall. An area around the outfall is closed to shellfishing. Inflow and infiltration corrections and oper- ation and maintenance improvements are proposed. 2. The Northport Village Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant is located on Beach Street, Northport. The 0.5 MGD activatated sludge plant currently discharges 0.15 MGD to Northport Harbor (Class A) 1,100 feet from shore. An area around the outfall is closed to shellfishing. 3. The Suffolk County Sewer District No. 6 - Kings Park Sewage Treatment Plant is located at St. Johnland Road and Squire Lane, Kings Park. The 2.0 MGD activated sludge plant currently discharges 1.0 MGD to Long Island Sound (Class SA) about 1 mile offshore in water 16-18 feet deep at low water. Water quality in an area around the outfall generally meets SA standards, but is closed to shellfishing as a precaution. 4. The Suffolk County Sewer District No. 1 - Port Jefferson Treatment Plant is located on Beach Street in Port Jefferson. The 2.27 MGD primary plant currently discharges 1.8 MGD to Port Jefferson Harbor. The facility serves a portion of the Village of Port Jefferson and the NYS University at Stony Brook. 5. The Village of Greenport Sewage Treatment Plant is located on Moore's Lane, Greenport. The 0.50 MGD Imhoff Tank (primary treatment) currently discharges 0.323 MGD to Long Island Sound (Class SA). Plans are to upgrade the plant to secondary treatment and the project is ranked 69 Statewide. V-56 V. Peconic River - Peconic Bay Area 1o The Brookhaven Area Office, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission is located in Upton. This basic reaearch laboratory discharges about 1 NGD of treated sewage effluent to the Peconic River. The effluent contains radioisotopes which are reported to be well within MRC effluent standards for off-site radioactive discharges. 2. H. F. Corwin and Son is a commercial duck farm which processes and freezes approximately 4,000 ducks per day with an average population of 150,000. The facilities are located in Aquebogue. Wastes collected from farming and processing are provided with primary settling, biological treatment in an aerated lagoon (4-5 days detention), final settling and chlorination. The 1.35 MGD discharge is to Meeting House Creek (Class SD:, 900 feet north of the Long Island Railroad and 1,500 feet east of Edgar Avenue. 3. The Town of Riverhead, Riverhead Sewer District Facility is located on Riverhead Drive, Riverhead. The 1.2 MGD trickling filter plant currently discharges 0.6 MGD to the Peconic River. There are no plans for immediate plant improvement. A 201 study is underway. 4. The Shelter Island Heights Association Sewage Treatment Plant is located at Summerfield Place and Clinton Avenue, Shelter Island Heights. The .030 MGD primary plant currently discharges 0.04 MGD to Shelter Island Sound about 350 feet offshore from the sewage treatment plant. 5. Bulova Watch Company is located on Washington Street, Sag Harbor. The industry, in production of 2,000 watch cases V-57 per day, discharges a combined 0.517 MGD of non-contact cooling water, process water and sanitary waste to Sag Harbor. Plans are to send sanitary wastes and some process wastes to the Sag Harbor facility. The industry presently has a settling basin. 6. The Village of Sag Harbor presently discharges 0.02 MGD of raw sewage to Sag Harbor Bay. Plans to provide o.1 MGD of advanced treatment potentially including nitrogen removal. Projects are ranked 46 and 47. VI. Montauk Point-Atlantic Ocean 1. The U. S. Air Force Station at Montauk operates an 0.02 MGD secondary treatment plant which discharges treated domestic waste water through an outfall to the Atlantic Ocean (Class SA). VII. Moriches Bay-Atlantic Ocean 1. Long Island Duck Farms Cooperative is located on Moriches Boulevard, Eastport. Approximately 13,000 ducks per day are processed with no farming at the site. Wastewater is biolog- ically treated in an aerated lagoon (5 day detention), a settling lagoon and chlorination. The 0.25 MGD discharge is to Seatuck Creek (Class SD), 1,000 feet west of Seatuck Avenue and 1,250 feet south of Montauk Highway. 2. Moriches Duck Farms, Inc. processes 2,000 ducks per day with an average population of 45,000 ducks. The facility is located on Barnes Road, Moriches. Wastes collected from the farm and processing are provided bioligical treatment in an aerated lagoon (5 day detention), sedimintation and chlorin- ation. The 0.16 MGD effluent is discharged to Swift Stream V-58 (Class D) 1,000 feet west of Barnes Road and 3,500 feet north of Montauk Highway. 3. Jurgielewicz Duck Farm processes approximately 5,000 ducks per day with a population of 45,000. The facilities are located on Barnes Road, Moriches. Wastes collected from farm and processing are provided biological treatment in an aerated lagoon (5 day detention), a settling lagoon and chlorination. The 0.37 MGD discharge is to Swift Stream (Class D), 1,000 feet west of Barnes Road and 2,300 feet north of Montauk Highway. VIII. Great South Bay-Atlantic Ocean 1. The Village of Patchogue Sewage Treatment Facilitv is located on Hammond Street, Patchogue. The 0.35 MGD primary plant currently discharges variable flows to Patchogue River. Plans are to develop an 0.5 MGD secondary treatment plant, and in the interim, attempt to eliminate excessive infiltra- tion and inflow. 2. The Village of Ocean Beach facility is located on Bay and Surfview Walk, Ocean Beach. The .05 MGD primary plant currently discharges 0.15 MGD to Great South Bay. The plant is being upgraded. A collector has priority 55. IX. South Oyster Bay-Atlantic Ocean 1. The Suffolk County Southwest Sewer District No. 3 is under construction. More than half of the trunk and lateral sewer lines have been placed and the 30 MGD activited sludge STP, to be located on Great East Neck between Lindenhurst and Babylon, is under construction. An ocean outfall is to be build from the plant across Great South Bay and Cedar Island, V-59 through Gilgo State Park and extending out into the-Ocean. X. East Bay-Middle Bay-Hempstead Bay Atlantic Ocean 1. The Nassau County SD #3, Cedar Creek Water Pollution Control Plant is located on Merric Road at Cedar Creek Park, Wantagh. The 45 MGD activated sludge plant has recently gone into operation. The outfall is to the Atlantic Ocean at 40033' 57" N 73026'46'W. The outfall was damaged during construction and discharged to South Oyster Bay. The Bay portion has been repaired. The Ocean portion is also being repaired. Water quality in an area around the outfall generally meets SA standards, but is closed to shellfishing as a precaution. A 5 MGD groundwater recharge demonstration project with 3.5 MGD of advanced waste treatement and recharge basins is proposed for this site. This project is ranked 57 Statewide. 2. The Jones Beach Sewage Disposal Plant is located in the State Park at Wantagh. The plant is a 2.5 MGD trickling filter that discharges 0.225 MGD in summer and 0.05 MGD in winter to Sloop Channel about 270 feet offshore. There are no plans for modifying this plant. Water quality in an area around the outfall generally meets SA standards, but is closed to shellfishing as a precaution. 3. The Village of Freeport Sewage Treatment Plant is located at the foot of Albany Avenue, Freeport. The plant is a 4.0 MGD trickling filter which presently discharges 4.2 MGD to Stadium Park (CLass SC). Plans are to discontinue discharge. Sewage is to be transferred to the Nassau County Sewer District #3 at Wantagh. 4. The Nassau County Bay Park Sewage Treatment Plant is located on 4th Avenue in East Rockaway. The 60 MGD activated sludge V-60, plant is currently discharging 63 MGD to Reynolds Channel (Class SB). Industries dischrging to the system include: A.M.F., Inc. G.I.M. Metal Products Great Neck Saw Norwich Manufacturing Company, Inc. Bernard Screening Plans are to upgrade and expand the existing secondary treatment plant and construct an ocean outfall. 5. The City of Long Beach Water Pollution Control Plant is located at West Pine Street and National Boulevard, Long Beach. The 6.36 MGD trickling filter presently discharges 6.9 MGD to Reynolds Channel (Class SB) about 150 feet off the South Bank of Reynolds Channel and about 1,100 feet northeast of the plant. Nassau County is preparing a facility plan for this facility. 6. The West Long Beach Sewer District Sewage Treatment Plant is located at 2150 Bay Boulevard, Atlantic Beach. The 1.5 MGD trickling filter discharges 0.65 MGD to Reynolds Channel (Class SB). 7. The Village of Lawrence Water Pollution Control Facility is at Rock Hall Road and Doughty Boulevard, Lawrence. The plant is a 1.5 MGD trickling filter which currently discharges 0.95 MGD to Bannister Creek about 3,000 feet from its conflu- ence with Reynolds Channel (Class SB). XI. Jamaica Bay 1. The Village of Cedarhurst Water Pollution Control Plant is located on Peninsula Street, Cedarhurst. The plant is a 1.5 MGD trickling filter which presently discharges about 1.0 MGD to Mott Creek (Class I). V-61 2. The Nassau County Inwood Sewage Treatment Plant is located at 1 Incinerator Road. Inwood. The 2.5 MGD trickling filter currently discharges 1.5 MGD to Jamaica Bay (Class SB). There are no plans to modify the system. 3. The Rockaway Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Beach Channel Drive and 106th Street, Queens. The plant is being expanded to an average daily design flow of 45 NGD and presently discharges 19.3 MGD to Jamaica Bay (Class SB) through two outfalls. An emergency bypass discharges to Jamaica Bay at the plant. There are 27 combined sewer overflows. The adjacent Broad Channel area is unsewered and is a source of untreated discharges to Jamaica Bay by roughly 1400 residents. There is no current abatement plan for this area. 4. The Maimonides Institute Sewage Treatment Plant is located at 34-01 Mott Avenue, Far Rockaway, Queens. The plant is designed to provide biological treatment to an average flow of 0.0060 MGD and currently discharges 0.0017 MGD. The outfall is to Jamaica Bay (Class SB) adjacent to and north- east of the plant. There are a number of raw discharges from the Institute to the Bay. Plans are to intercept these discharges for treatment at the plant. 5. The Jamaica Water Pollution Control Plant is located at 150-20 - 134th Street, Queens. The treatment plant is designed for an average daily flow of 100 MGD and presently discharges 93 MGD to Jamaica Bay (Class SB). Discharge #002 is an emergency bypass to Jamaica Bay at the plant site. Industries discharging to the plant include: V-62 Pharmaceutical Company (SIC 2834) The Vitarine Company Metal Plating and Fabricating (SIC 3471) Jamaica Electro Plating Corporation Sherman Electro Plating, Inc. Ideal Toy Corporation Quad Metal Polishing Company Angel Harp Manufacutring Corporation Automotive Plating Corporation Clermont Electro Plating and Polishing The plant is under construction to upgrade treatment from the modified aeration process to step aeration. An area adjacent to Hawtree Basin consists of numerous homes built on pilings which are a source of untreated discharges. There is no current abatement plan for this area. 6. The Spring Creek Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Autumn Avenue and Fairfield Avenue, Brooklyn. The Spring Creek facility was designed to treat runoff entering combined sewers in the area. The Basin has a capacity of 1.3 million cubic feet; flow in excess of this volume is chlorinated and discharged to Old Mill Creek. Water retained in the Basin is pumped to the 26th Ward water pollution control plant for treatment and discharge. 7. The 26th Ward Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Flatlands Avenue and Hendrix Street, Brooklyn. The plant is being expanded from 60 MOD to 85 MGD of step aeration. The plant currently discharges 66 MGD. There are two discharges to Hendrix Creek. Industries discharging to the system include: Textile Mill Products (SIC Code 220) Nylor Knit Goods Dyeing Company V-63 Metal Fabricating and FinishinR (SIC Code 3471) 1. International Appliance Corporation 2. Sheffield Plating Corporation 3. Pivot Metal Works 4. Process Finishing Company, Inc. 5. Norwood Electroplating Corporation 6. Perma Plating Company 7. Beaver Plating and Polishing 8. Ideal Corporation (808 Georgia Avenue) 9. Ideal Corporation (436 Liberty Avenue) 10. Spear Lighting Fixtures, Inc. 11. Badger Aluminum Extrusion 12. J & L Mirror Novelty Company There are three combined sewer overflows. 8. Conev Island Water Pollution Control Plant is located at Avenue Z and Knapp Street, Brooklyn. The treatment plant is designed for an average daily flow of 110 MGD and currently discharges 100 MGD through two outfalls (#001 and #002) to Rockaway Inlet (Class SB). Discharge #001 is a 90-inch diameter outfall which discharges 41 feet below the water surface. Discharge #002 is a 72-inch outfall which discharges 41 feet below the water surface. A third outfall for treated, but unchlorinated effluent, discharges to Shell Bank Creek (Class I) in 11 feet of water about 35 feet past the bulkhead line. Industries discharging to the system include: 1. Electro-Knit Fabrics, Inc. Metal Finishing (SIC #3471) 1. Abie Anodizing Corporation 2. General Iron Corporation 3. Phoenix Lighting Fixture Company, Inc. There are three combined sewer overflows. Plans are to upgrade the plant from modified aeration to step aeration. V-64 V.2.b. Thermal Discharges 1. The Consolidated Edison-Arthur Kill Generating Station is located at 4401 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island. The two stream units have a total generating capacity of 911 MW. The single 654.4 MOD discharge to the Arthur Kill is 4500 feet north of Little Fresh Kills. 2. The Consolidated Edison-Hudson Avenue Generating Station is located on Hudson Avenue at the East River, Brooklyn. There are 7 units with a total nameplate capacity of 700 MW. There are two discharges. Number #001 has a maximum flow of 967.9 MGD of condenser cooling water and boiler blowdown, ion exchanger wastes, boiler chemical cleaning wastes, air preheater wash wastes and equipment and floor drain wastes. Discharge #002 with a maximum flow of 0.114 MGD is boiler blowdown only. 3. The Consolidated Edison East River Generating Station is located at 14th Street and the East River, Manhattan. The three steam units have a total generating capacity of 513 MW. The discharge of 541.2 MGD to the East River between 14th and 15th Streets is primarily condenser cooling water. 4. The Consolidated Edison Waterside Generating Station is located at 38th Street and First Avenue, Manhattan. The 12 units have a total nameplate capacity of 596 MW. There are two discharges to the East River between 38th Street and 39th Street. Discharge #001 of 555.0 MGD is primarily condenser cooling water. Discharge #002 of 0:53 MGD consists of boiler blowdown, floor drain wastes, etc. Sanitary wastes are discharged to a municipal system. 5. The Consolidated Edison Ravenswood Generating and Steam Station is located at 3854 Vernon Boulevard, Long Island City, Queens. V-65 The three units have a total capacity of 1828 MW. There are two existing discharges to the east channel of the East River. Discharge #001 of 1390 MGD which is primarily condenser cooling water is located just upstream of a New York City Park. Discharge #002 which is 0.427 MGD of boiler blowdown is located approximately 1300 feet farther upstream. 6. The Consolidated Edison 74th Street Generating Station is located at 506 East 75th Street, Manhattan. The four stream units have a total generating capacity of 209 MW. The discharge of 316.8 MGD to the East River between 74th and 75th Streets is primarily condenser cooling water. 7. The Consolidated Edison Astoria Generating Station is located at 20th Avenue and 21st Street, Astoria, Queens. Steam units 1-5 have a capacity of 1550 MW. Unit 6 is to be constructed with an additional capacity of 800 MW. There is a single 1362.5 MGD dis- charge (primarily condenser cooling water) to the East River, approximately 300 feet northeast of the intersection of 20th Avenue and Shore Boulevard. Unit 6 is to discharge 758 MGD approximately 2000 feet northeast of the existing discharge. 8. LILCO-Glenwood Power Station is located on Bay Shore Road, Glenwood Landing. The station has a maximum generating capacity of 381 MW. There are four steam units and 21 discharges to Hempstead Harbor. Discharges 001, 002 and 003 are the dominant discharges averaging 392 MGD of condenser cooling water. The remaining discharges average 3.3 MGD and consist of boiler blowdown, floor drains, etc. Discharge #22 is a .003 MGD snaitary discharge. 9. The Long Island Lighting Company Northport Generating Station is located on Waterside Avenue at Eatons Neck Road, Northport. The v-66 three steam units have a total capacity of 1125 MW. There are 9 discharges to Long Island Sound. Dischargel/006 of 681.8 MGD of condenser cooling water is the principal discharge. The other discharges are to the facilities intake canal which transports water from the Sound. 10. The Long Island Lighting Company Port Jefferson Power Station is located on Beach Street, Port Jefferson. The station, with 4 steam units, has a maximum generating capacity of 438 MW. There are 24 discharges to Port Jefferson Harbor with a total average flow of 375 MGD. 11. The LILCO Shoreham Nuclear Power Station is being constructed on North Country Road, Wading River. The net generating capacity is to be 820 MW. The discharge of 862.8 MGD to Long Island Sound is primarily non-contact cooling water. 12. The LILCO-Far Rockaway Power Station is located at 1425 Bay 24th Street, Far Rockaway, Queens. The single steam unit has a maximum generating capacity of 100MW. There are 20 discharges to Mott Basin. Discharge #001 of 82 MGD of condenser cooling water is the predominant discharge. 13. LILCO-E. F. Barrett Power Station is located on McCarthy Road, Island Park. The station has two steam units (No. I - 189 MW and No. 2 - 191 MW). There are five discharges to Barnums Island Channel. Discharge #005 is the dominant flow of 294 MGD of condenser cooling water. Other discharges total an average flow of .028 MGD and consist of boiler blowdown, floor drains, etc. V-67 V.3. Municipal Needs and Priorities To meet water quality standards, municipalities must upgrade wastewater treatment plants, sewer unsewered areas, renovate old equipment or systems, and expand existing facilities. Interceptors must be placed, pump stations must be constructed and outfalls must be improved. Additionally, techniques of aquaculture, groundwater recharge, land disposal, storm water treatment, virus detection, sludge conditioning, runoff control, and dredge disposal methods need to be tested and developed. V.3.a. Needs Survey The Department of Environmental Conservation conducted the "1974 Needs - Survey" to estimate the cost of construction through 1990 of publicly owned wastewater treatment facilities needed to meet the long-range objectives of PL 92-500. Approximately 2200 survey questionnaires were completed statewide to estimate these costs. Cost estimates for the planning area are presented in eight categories in Table 21. A more detailed breakdown of these needs is provided in the Appendix. A "1976 Needs Survey" is presently being developed. V.3.b. Construction Grants In progressing toward the long-range water quality goals, municipal treatment systems are to be providing secondary treatment (or higher removals where needed to meet water quality standards) by July 1977 or shortly thereafter. Table 21 presents the abatement status of those dischargers located on Figures 13, 14 and 15. State and federal construction grants were established to promote pollution abatement and to economically assist local governments in construction costs. Funded projects include pump stations (PS), force mains (FM), interceptors (INT), sewage treatment plants (STP), and outfall sewers (OS). Trunk sewers, lateral sewers, house connections, infiltration/inflow corrections, and non-point source V-68 TABLE 21 SUMMARY OF 1974 SURVEY OF NEEDS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES ($1,000 June 1973) CATEGORY NYC WESTCHESTER NASSAU SUFFOLK TOTAL I 0 68,853 56,747 89,817 215,417 II . 1,143,553 2,057 347,096 531,160 2,023,866 IIIA 232,900 '35,130 6,630 721 275,381 IIIB 1,795,998 3,168 24,582 0 1,823,748 IVA 1,330,321 7,084 649,026 1,107,413 3,093,844 IVB 216,578 2,950 115,341 750,253 1,085,122 V 2,834,442 0 0 0 2,834,442 Sub total 7,553,792 119,242 1,199,422 2,479,364 11,351,820 VI 99,129 174,017 739,667 1,869,491 2,882,304 Total 7,652,921 293,259 1,939,089 4,348,855 14,234,124 CATEGORY I - *Secondary Treatment (AWT not required) CATEGORY II - *Secondary Treatment and/or AWT CATEGORY IIIA - Infiltration/Inflow Correction including treatment CATEGORY IIIB - Replacement or Major Rehabilitation of sewers. CATEGORY IVA - *New Collectors, etc. CATEGORY IVB - *New Interceptors, etc. CATEGORY V - Correction of combined sewer overflows CATEGORY VI - Treatment and/or control of storm waters *Categories currently eligible for federal funds under Public Law 92-500. V-69 control were initially all ineligible for construction grants and had to be constructed at local expense. In early 1976, federal grants were extended to include most community sewer construction and repair. Several construction grants projects are under construction. Table 22 and Figure 16 present those projects for which facilities plans and designs have been completed and are pending construction grants. These are the next projects scheduled to be constructed. Area projects have been compared with projects statewide and assigned the priority ratings indicated. Table 23 and Figure 17 present those projects pending grants for design, as well as construction. Patchogue is a primary plant which must be upgraded. Project descriptions are abbreviated in Tables 22 and 23 as: STP - Sewage treatment plant STP ADD - Sewage treatment plant addition STP UP - Upgrading existing sewage treatment plant from primary to secondary MOD - Modification PS - Pump station FM - Force main OS - Outfall sewer INR - Interceptor Site Prep. - Site preparation Rehab. - Sewer system rehabilitation Ret. Fac. - Retention facilities They are also coded as: TYPE WORKS 1. New waste treatment system (NEW) 1. Outfall sewer 2. Interceptor sewer 2. Modification of existing system 3. Collector sewer with increase in capacity (INC) 4. Forcemain 5. Pumping station 3. Modification of existing system with 6. Sewer infiltration correction increase in treatment level (INT) 7. Separation of combined storm/ sanitary sewers 4. Modification of existing system 8. Treatment plant with increase in both capacity and 9. Other works treatment level (ICT) 5. Modification to existing system with no increase in capacity or treatment level -- interceptor, pumping station, etc. (MOD) V-70 TABLE 22 PROJECTS PENDING CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (RANKED STATEWIDE) * ~~~~~~~~~~~(5/76) GRANT AP'PLICATIONI E s timated NPDES IoasT. TARGET EPA [St. Elflible PPRIORITY RARTY MPPLCAIIT LEGAL NWfl MWEll &Mber ;,tep DATE PROJECT DESCRIPTlO~l Ass ktance Project Cost Raekle9 ~~~~~~COUNTV (tSlm) HYG00 C36_ s Y171(yr. A Maj (Facilityv Need Scope) CSI .000) (S1.010) 10 81,25 New Rochelle 50 567 3 12176 m oo - 3 498.75 6 Westchester (17) Col -.. .12. 81.25 Oakwood Reach 26174 392 U1 10/76 1100-2,4,5 .14,700 19,603 hie0 (17) Int.PS.Fli 13 81.25 O akwood Beach 26174 312 III 3/77 MO004 34,350 45,300 lot BUS2 Do. . 26174 392 IV 7/77 vo0-2,4's 72,100 1111,PS.Fm 81.25 Do. 26174 392 v 6/77 110-2 4 5 18,SOG 14 81.25, Do. 26174 392 VI :.477 1100-3 6,600 8;800 Col. 37 71.6 B ed flook 27073 394 it q176 meV-B 49,539.25 66,119 NYC (17) STP 38 71.88 Do. 27073 394 ITT 6/75 MrEW2 56,611.5 75,432 lot. 39 71.88 De. 27073 394 IV 8/76 NEll-5 8,212.5 10.950 43 , 71.88 Red Ifook 21073 394 V 1177 MElf-2 28,75S.75 38,341 NYC (17) Int. 71.83 Do. 27073 394 JI 11111-824,1 STP 46 69.57 Sag Harbor (Y) 28908 433 it 8/76 MOM0- S1Io Suffolk (17) as 41 69.57 Sag Harbor Mv 28908 433 III 11176 1100-6 162 216 Suffolk (17) Kebab. 62 68.iS Gl~~~~en Co-la (C) 266410 665 IA 10/76 ma4 ,505a0 5368.7 0:. 260 665 It 3/7 MOD03 607.5 810 Suff~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol. Suffolk (17) Col . 149 602.50 Sruffort (. 2009613 136 I 576 M D 00- 1 .2.2 5 15.4 Suffolk (17) Cl.l 141 . 62.SD Do6 1036 1 5/76 1100.3 21.855 29,140 Cat. 142 62.50 Do. 1036 if 10/76 110D-2 2,897.25 3,863 143 52.50 Do. 1036 it 10/76 11003 . 24,921 33.228 cat 62.50 De. 1036 115/77 1100-2 4.709 VIlT 144 62.SQ Do. 1036 III 5/77 1100-3 42,559.5 56.746 Col 146 62.50 e l Ind Brook 28719 69.5 1 3/76 TNT - 1,8 10,836.75 14,449 Westchester (17) SIP1,06 16 62.50 De. 26719 696 11 11/76 MO-03 1,668.5 2,222 173 56.25 Port Chester ()26786 695 1 3/76 TNT -4,8 16,891.5 22,522 Westchester (17) SPn 174 56.25 Do. 26186 695 it 12/76 MOD0 -3 45 so Col. 178 56.25 Cedar Creek WPCP 26859 882 B 4/76 31 .4.8.9 24,807 33.076 Nassau (17) STP.Mt.RecIharge 178 56.25 C edar Creek 1.1M, 26859 982 it 6/76 WO3-3 32.640 43,520 Nassau (17) Col. 179 $6.25 Co0. 16859 982 III 12176 1100.3 24,275.25 32.367 IS0 56.25 Do. 26859 982 IV 4177 moo-3 .26,593.5 35,458 ColI. 56.25 o 16859 982 V, 12/77 HOD-3 128.640 Col 56.2 Do. 26859 98? VI 17/78 1100-3 126.183 Col. 56.25 Do. 26839 982 1111 12/72 1100-3 133.708 V-71 -Cl QUEENS ) 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~REMPR 1100K *-~~~~~~~~ r ~~OCEABEC PROJECTS PENDING GRANTS ATLANTIC OCEAN - L.I. SOUND ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PANNAREACH17 ~~1CEDARCR.~~~~~~~RCR. ~~10 0 0 SCALE: MILE S FIGURlE 16 - TABLE 23 PROJECTS PENDING GRANTS FOR PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION (UNRANKED) (5/76) MPtrs 10ENt. M U M t EI'A [%E. 821~ PRIORITY PRIO4RI T APPI2CIT tECAt N"1E IUMSNER Mvybr DAFE PSOJECT M2CWTII'T lsisld'cc 9'.0jact cost ~~ank~ng SCCSN CuIMEAY (RASIM] NYQ9- =-36- pha~se (Yr. 7. 1o.) (racilityv IIed Scoo'e) (ai I('~ WA .CO) 43.75 Riverhead CT) 20061 Mi~lkc (11) 917 2 - 57? 1C.T. - C 1.377 1 .83G. SIP Jt 'efferson SD 275 709 2 6/71 K 1ew - 2.8 1,012-5 1.350 Suffolk county (17) Int ST Ka5rtarofleck so 26701 9J Westchester (13) 000 -ell 2.25' 6.5 Coniey Island 26182 396 1 8/76 Int-11 1.038 1 38 NYC (1)STP-UP 1 4.9 56.25 W.s He~d 26266 432 1 9/76 1317 ,4 NYC (17 .1. 5 1791 53.13 I1e.Lotow Creekt 713 1 ;7 .2 .6 NYC (17) 161 .6 50.00 Iaussau Co. SD 12 26450 $92 /181 .3 Passau (171 67 1 ,3 31.25 West LOA3 Beach 23523 '1043 11/634 Nassau (1; 1/6 YSuffok Co. Sufronk Ce. 994 11/76 1037 *4 Suifujk (27) 138.7 .906 Ites Castie IT) Acrewontc So 97 21/76 30 40 1:estchlester (13) Suffolk Co. 21759 709 1 77 3. 2 * Port Jefferson So 77 Suffolk (17) 3. 1 Nassau (11) (1owry)a 26158 9/77 Sludge Disposal 10200 )funt's Point 211 . 1Sbu 5 0 NYC (17) 211197SldeDisposalI S 2 0 Jamisaca 26177 . lde ps 0 NYC (1) 26215 S ldg Dipoa IO200 Rockaway 26222 19/7 SueDspal364 NYC (17) 97 ldeDs ~ ~ 34 Tall-an's Island 26239 29/71 Sludge Disposal 120 160 NYC (11) Por 9iIsd260 /77 Sludge Disposal 54 72 Ward's Island 261311SldeDpol2430 NYC fl)97 Sug'7ipsl24 2 26th Vard 26212 19/77 Sludge Disposal 210 900 NYC (17]STT V-73 STATEETCHSTP JERSE~~~~~fNY =$IANI Olif~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~FGR 17N IN P~LANT NO.~ LOCATION STATUS- I. BUSHNEL.L AVE REII CSI Z. CONMER ST. PREum. DESIGN 3. BOSTON RO. PRELIM. DESIGN 4.z 4. THROGS NECIC UWO. M PERDEGAT SAMO PRELKi DESIGNWETETR S. FRESH, CREEK PRELIM. DESIGN H. ENDRIX CREEK PRELIM DESIGN ETHS R IL SPRING CREEK IN OPERATION S. B ERME BASIN la. rl4JsToN &AMI i. VIELE AME. IS. INAIW ST. !Tax 13. SOUJNOVEW ML. 4. wwnI PLAINS MC 15. MIGSLEY CREEK t. WESTCHESTER CI. VL %.~ 12 WESTCHESTER CK. E. la. fOWER BAY g.T.W. 2. IsE. LOF BOVRY SAY &TX.~ M GRAN CENTRIAL PKWV m3 2006 AVE. FU9S"WlB 24. n4UISIN DAY N. is COL.LEGE POINT 1 21k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ XSTN PROPOSED - ~~--- STOR ATER RAMNTPAS show, ~~ ATLANTIC OCEAN -L.I. SOUND PLANNING AREA (17) FIGURE 18 from NYC Plan V- 75 Figure 18 presents a New York City plan for development of storm water treatment plants. These auxiliary plants are one means of controlling combined sewer overflows. Abatement of combined sewer overflows will require auxiliary plant construction and extensive additional construction and controls. V.4 Abatement Requirements and Compliance Schedules The State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permits are part of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). These permits establish effluent limits and schedules of compliance in meeting these limits. Effluent limits are established for each discharge. For most dischargers, several specific limits have been established. Table 24 presents fivemday BOD limitations. Interim effluent limits and self-monitoring requirements were established for those discharges which did not meet BPT or AWT requirements at permit issuance. When plans, designs, or construction were firmly underway, final effluents were also included in the permits. When plans were not firm, such as when a sewer district expansion was uncertain, final limits could not be established and the permit was set to expire on June 30, 1977. Compliance schedules for these permits include the development of facilities plans, and engineering reports. By July 1, 1977 or shortly thereafter, all wastewater treatment plants are to be providing at least secondary treatment or BPT. Any exceptions to this will be due to delays in funding, construction, design or planningand dischargers may be subject to penalties. Discharges to water quality limited segments may be required to provide removals greater than BPT. Water quality models being developed through 208 studies are expected to evaluate the need. V.5. Interstate Waters The planning area shares boundaries with New Jersey, Connecticut and Rhode Island. Discharges from these states to waters which flow into the planning V-76 area affect area water quality. Detailed plans for these discharges are to be .included in these states' Basin Plans. The New Jersey discharges to New York Harbor, Raritan Bay, the Kill Van Kull, the Arthur Kill and their tributaries are -numerous and many are industrial discharges. The Passaic Valley primary discharge of 250 MGD is the largest discharge in the metropolitan area. The Middlesex County Sewerage Authority, Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority and the Elizabeth Joint Meeting are other municipal discharges. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection may be contacted on Basin Plans for these areas. A restaurant-motel-light industry complex is-being developed with septic tanks, followed by an 0.08 M4GD AWT process which discharges to Wampus River, a tributary of the Byram River. This flows into Connecticut. Farther northeast, there ate several communities with septic tank systems. Increased populations in these areas could create pressure to sewer, provide AWT, and discharge to . headwaters of Connecticut water supply watersheds. Title 10, Section 155.108 of the New York State Health Law (see Appendix) places restrictions on activities and discharges within headwaters of the Stamford Water Company water supply reservoirs. There are no active plans to sewer these areas, and unless popula- tions drastically inc mase, conflict between watershed development for water supply and surface discharge will be avoided. Connecticut discharges to rivers which flow to the Sound are numerous. The currents of the Sound are considered to minimize the effects of Connecticut discharges on New York waters of the Sound. The Byram River at its mouth appears to be affected not only by the Port Chester discharge, but by Connecticut sources. Dredging and dredge disposal are also a sharediconcern. The Connecticut Depart- ment of Environmental Protection may be contacted on Basin Plans for these areas. Rhode Is land waters on Block Island Sound border New York waters. These waters are of excellent quality. V-77 TABLE 24 NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD l |1~ ~ DA BDEFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT WASTE SOURCE I Ibs,/day mg/l REMOV. I TO EXPIRATION DATE I. New York Bays - Arthur Kill - Kill Van Kull Nassau Smelting & January 31, 1974 - Refining January 31, 1979 NYC-Port Richmond 15,015 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 Sucrest Corp. 768 June_28, 1975-- June 28, 1979 (28,285) (Until July 1, 1977) Bush Terminal 236 Dec. 31, 1974-Dec. 31, Assoc. 1979 ( 4,695) _ (Until July 1, 1977) NYC-Owls Head 80,000 60 55% May 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 NYC-Oakwood Beach 10,000 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 II. East River - Harlem River NYC-Red Hook May 31, 1975 - (Proposed) June 30, 1977 Amstar Corp. 756 March 31, 1974 - March 31, 1979 NYC-Newtown Cr. 206,800 80 60% May 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 (111,200) (43) (8 0/) (Prior to Manhattan: PS tieiin October .of 1975) Interboro Surface _ DRAFT Phelps-Dodge Ref. 3.3 July 31, 1974 - July 31, 1979 V-78 Table 24 (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS |I -. 5 DAY BOD EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMI' WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/I REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE II. East River - Harlem River (contd.). Pearl Wick Corp. September 30, 1974 September 29, 1979 NYC-Wards Island 66,300 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 NYC-Bowery Bay 37,530 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 NYC-Hunts Point 50,000 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 NYC-Tallmans I. 20,000 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 III. Western Long Island Sound Port Chester ** ** August 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 Blind Brook *** ** ** October 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 Mamaroneck ** ** December 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 New Rochelle *** ** ** December 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 Belgrave .500 30 85% June 28, 1974 - June 28, 1979 Great Neck (V) 375 30 85% December 31, 1974 - December 31, 1979 (500) (40) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) V-79 Table 24 (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD ~~~~~~~I ~EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMI1 WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/l REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE III. Western Long Island Sound (contd.) Great Neck SD 35 80% January 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 Port Washington 30 85% 'November 30, 1974 - November 30, 1979 (35) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) Roslyn (V) 130 30 85% October 31, 1974 - October 30, 1979 (130) (30) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) Glen Cove 100 65% December 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 X Oyster Bay 313 30 85% March 29, 1974- March 29, 1979 (_) (30) (80%) (Until July 1, 1977) IV. Central and Eastern Long Island Sound Huntington S.D. 500 30 85% February 28, 1975 - February 28, 1980 Northport 75 30 85% February 28, 1974 - February 28, 1979 Kings Park State 250 30 85% March 29, 1974 - Hospital March 29, 1979 Port Jefferson *** ** ** March 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 Greenport ** ** June 30, 1974 - June 30, 1977 V-80 Table 24 (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS | 5 DAY BOD, EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMII WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/l REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE V. Peconic River-Peconic Bay Area Brookhaven Nat'l. 575 30 85% January 31, 1975 - Laboratory January 31, 1980 H. F. Corwin & Sons 326 January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 (1,400) . (Until July 1, 1977) Riverhead 300 30 85% March 29, 1974 - March 29, 1979 Shelter Island 8 30 85% May 31, 1974 - Heights Assoc. May 31, 1979 Bulova Watch February 28, 1975 - February 27, 1980 Sag Harbor 25 30 85% DRAFT (Proposed) VI. Montauk Point-Atlantic Ocean U.S. Air Force 7.5 30 85% May 31, 1974 - May 31, 1979 VII. Moriches Bay-Atlantic Ocean L.I. Duck Farms 70 February 28, 1975 - Coop. February 28, 1980 (200) (Until July 1, 1977) Moriches Duck Farm 113 February 28, 1975 - February 28, 1980 (142) (Until July 1, 1977) Jurgielewicz Duck 120 February 28, 1975 - Farm February 28, 1980 (230) V-81 Table 24 (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS 5 DAY BOD EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/l REMOV TO EXPIRATION DATE VIII. Great South Bay-Atlantic Ocean Patchogue ** ** *** July 31, 1974 - June 30, 1977 Ocean Beach 125 30 85% June-28, 1974 - June 27, 1979 Yaphank SD PROPOSED (Proposed) Suffolk SD #2 PROPOSED (Proposed) IX. South Oyster Bay-Atlantic Ocean S.W.S.D. PROPOSED (Under Const.) West Central S.D. PROPOSED (Proposed) X. East Bay-Middle Bay-Hempstead Bay-Atlantic Ocean Nassau SD #3 11,300 30 85% January 31, 1975 - Cedar Creek January 31, 1980 Jones Beach 625 30 85% May 31, 1975 - May 31, 1980 Freeport 2,837 85 72% May 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977. (To be discontinued) Nassau SD #2 30 85% December 31, 1974 - Bay Park June 30, 1977 Long Beach 35 75% February 28, 1975 - June 30, 1977 West Long Beach 375 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 Lawrence 375 30 85% February 28, 1974 - February 28, 1979 V-82 Table 24 (contd.) NPDES/SPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT RESTRICTIONS I 5 DAY BOD I asI~ ~~~ | EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMI' WASTE SOURCE lbs./day mg/, ~REMOV. TO EXPIRATION DATE XI. Jamaica Bay Cedarhurst 250 30 85% July 31, 1974 - July 31, 1979 Inwood 625 30 85% September 30, 1974 - September 30, 1979 NYC-Rockaway 11,260 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 Mainenides Inst. 1.5 30 85% June 30, 1975 - June 30, 1980 NYC-Jamaica 25,020 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 NYC-Spring Cr. *** * ** January 31, 1975 - Auxiliary June 30, 1977 NYC-26th Ward 21,300 30 85% January 31, 1975 - January 31, 1980 NYC-Coney Island 41,300 45 55% January 31, 1975 - June 30, 1977 1. Values given are for 30-day averages for municipal discharges and daily averages for industries. 2. Where limits are given for lbs./day and for mg/I, the more stringent is the controlling. 3. The symbol -- indicates that a value has not been established. 4. The symbol ***, indicates that self-monitoring schedules have been established, in lieu of interim effluent limits. V-83 VI. CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF WATER QUALITY VI.i. Existing Classifications and Standards The declared public policy of the State of New York is "to maintain reasonable standards of purity of the waters of the State consistent with public health and public enjoyment thereof, the propagation and protection of fish and wildlife, including birds, mammals and other terrestrial aquatic life, and the industrial development of the State and to that end require the use of all known available and reasonable methods to prevent and control the pollution of the waters of the State of New York". The classification of New York State's groundwaters, 3.5 million acres of lakes, and more than 70,000 miles of rivers was initiated in 1949, and officially adopted in 1967. Every stream, lake, river, bay and estuary within New York has been classified as to its best usage. Water quality standards have been established to judge the suitability of water for its best usage. Both classifications and standards are periodically reviewed and are modified to reflect changes. The classifications and standards for marine waters, fresh surface waters and groundwaters are summarized in Tables 25, 26 and 27. In general, an "A" or "SA" water is for water supply, food proces- sing or shellfish culture, "B" or "SB" waters are for swimming, "C", "SC" or "I" waters are for fishing, and "D", "SD" or r`II" waters are suitable for fish survival, but not for fish propagation. The tables are more specific. Figures 19, 20 and 21 show the assigned classifications of area marine waters. More complete listings, including freshwater classifi- cations, may be found in Article 12, Nassau County Waters, Article 13; VI-1 TABLE 25 CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR FRESH SURFACE WATERS DISSOLVED OXYGEN STANDARDS COLIFO~RM STANDARDI RADIOACTIVITY STANDARDS Trout Waters Non Trout Waters Conditions Trout of Waters Min. M i n o. Monthly 20t% Monthly Total Classi- Blest Best Spawn- Daily Daily Median of Geometric Dissolved Phienolic Radium Strontium ficationt Usage U~sage ins Average Mini. Average Mini. Value Sample Mean ph Solids Compounds Gross Beta 226 901 Class AA Water supply Waters will 7 mg/i 6 mg/i S mg/i 5 mng/I 4 mg/i Less than Less than . ..6.5-8.5 As low as Less than Less than Less than Less thari for drinking meet ilealttl 50/1 00mlI 240/lO0rsi practicable. o.ooi vig/l 1000pc/i 3pc/i IQpc/l or food pro- Departiment colilorsis colitlurms Less than (phenol) (in absence of cessing standards 500 Alg/i Sr9O and alpha emitters) Class A Water supply Waters will 7 mg/i 6 mng/i S mg/i S mg/i 4 mg/I Less thaii Less than Less than 6.5-8.5 As low as Less than Less than Less than Less than ofa drinking creet Health 5000/100fill 20,0001 200/100mI practicable. 0.005 mg/i 1000pc/l 3pc/I iopc/i or food pro- Department coiiforniss 100mI fecal colt- Less than (phenol) (iii absence of cessing standards for coliforins forms 500 mg/i Sr9and alpha drinking e sitters) water with a1pproved treatmfent Class It Contact rec-----7 mg/i 6 mg/i S mng/i 5 mgt/i 4 mg/i Less lhan2 Lem~athan Less than2 6.5-8.5 None detri- *......-. reation and 2,400l/100 s,UO 200/100ml mental to other uses ml Coll- 100 ml fecal call- aquatic life. except water forms coliforms forms Waters cur- supply and rently letss food pro. than 500mg/i cessing shall restain below this limit. Class C Fishing and .-- 7mg/i 6 mg/i S mg/i 5 mg/i 4 mR/l ------- Less than2 6585Nn er. --- t'-3 ~~~~~~~~~oilier uses 10,000/i O0ml 6 m-1sNn ental -----o... except water coliforms and aquatic life. supply, lood 2,000/1(illm Waters cury- processing fecal cut forms rostly less and contact than 500mig/I recreation shall remain below this Ilximit, Class D Secondary Waters must ----- - . - m/ ---- .- - 3ig .... 6.0-9.5 -------....----... contact inc. be suitable reation. for fish Waters are survival not suitable for propaga- lion of fish CI1455 N Enjoyfrrvili of No waste Natural Nataral N~lutal Nalafal Nsaural Natural Nsatral Natural Naturaf Natural ...-- Natural Natural Natural water In Its discharges natural con- whatsoever dition for permitted whatever without ap- compatible proved fli- purposes trat ion through 200' of unconsol- idated earth N OTES: it A minimum of tIes uxamlnations are required. 21 Standlaid lo be met during all teriods of dlisinfection. 31 Additional standards applicable tu the above classifications: Turbidity-no Increasue ilit will ncause a substantial visible contrast to natrale conditlonsu: Color-None from man-made sources that .ill be detrimnetrat to the specified best ousag of waters; Suspended. coltodial of other *utirts-Norm from any waste discharge which will cause depOsitIon to the best usage or muter; Oil and floatine Subslances-Nu residuu attributable to a wasto discherue not visible oil rint nor gtobules of grease: Taste and odor-producing substances. toxic wastes and delsterious substances-None that will be iniorinus tu finsh life xi which will adverasly affect the flavor, color or odor, thereof, at impair the waters for the speciftud beat usage of water. Thermal discharges-No diuxharge =hch will be iniorinus to list life or tu make the waturs .-saet at nsusitoblo for any claussified use. 41 wit h t reeonce to certain touic substances affecting fish life. the establishmont of any smote. numerical standard for waters of Now York State would be too restrictive, There ate many waters. whic hbecause of tour bslferin capacity and composition will require special study to deturmine sale concenotrarions of route subutantens. However. most of the non-trout waters near industrial areas is this state will leave an alkalinity ottO0 milliarams per liter or above, Without considurinu increased of decreased tosicity from Possible combinations, the fltlowing may be considered a. safe streams concutrrutions fcmr sortain substatices to comply with tise above standard for this tyou of wotor. Water of lower alkutinity tast be specifically considered sInce the toxic slfcr of muost pollutants will be greatly inctausud. Amnunuia or Arnnmnmam Compoonds-Not grsater than 2.0 moilliarams Per titer espressed as NH3 at PH ofl0.0oar above: Cyanide-Not greater titan 0.1I milliliranis par liter eutiessed a. CN; Fatio or Forricyanido-Not utreiter than 0.4 mtllliuraims par liter uxprossed as FeICNi6; Coppur-Not gieatet than 0.2 milligrains Por liter estressed as C.s Zinc-Not ureater than 0.3 milligraws p0r lIaer eupressed as Znl Cadmium-Not ml . milgams per liter euimressed as Cd. TABLE 26 CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR MARINE WATERS DISSOLVED OXYGEN STANDARD COLIFORM STANDARD1 -Cl Bs2 207%2 Monthly2 TOXIC WASTES AND Cl:asa- Best MPN Monthly2 of Geometric DELETERIOUS fication Usase Hinimum Any Titme Median S-mel mean SUBSTANCES OTHER STANDARDS Class SA Shellfishing for 5.0 mg/1 Less than ---- None in amountst hat Varbae. cinder. ashes. o market purposes 70/100ml will interfere with use sludge or other refuse7: None and primary and colitform' for primary contact recre- in any waters of the marine secondry contact aton or 4 district as defined by Environaoaenal recreation Conservation Law (� 17-0105) Class SB Primary and secondary 5.0 mg/1 ---- Less than Less than Ltas than None in alnonts that pHi: The normal range shall not contact recreation 2,400/100ml 5,000/100mi 200/100ml will interfera with use be extended by more than one- and any other use coliform Collform fecal collform for primary contact tenth (0.1) pH unit. except for the recreation or 4 taking of shellfish recreation or ... 4 for market purpfses TurbidityB: No increase except for market purposes from natural sources that will cause a substantial visible Class SC Fishing and other 5.0 mg/l ---- ls than None in amounts that contrast to natural conditions. uses except primary 10,000/100ml will interfere with use In cases of naturally turbid contact recreation coliform and for secondary contact waters the contrast will be or the taking of 2,000/100ml recreation or ... 4 due to increased turbidity. shellfish for fecal colifotm market purposes Color8: None from man-made h-i ss rn All waters not primarily sources that will be detri- Class SD All waters not primarily 3.0 mg/i None alone or in combina- mental to anticipated be detri- for recreational purposes. tion with other substances usage of waters. shellfish culture or the or waates ... 5 development of fishlife an~~~~~~d b~~e cav u~elopment of natura ish~~ l ife~~ ~Suspe ndr d . collo d ial o r sett le able and because of natural sollds�: None from sewage, or man-made conditions industrial wastes or other wastes nnot meeOf these requirses - which will cause deposition or mentc as o f these a e uses. be deleteri ous d for the specific waters which are assigned to Clanas Secondary contact 4.0 mg/l ---- ---- - Less than None in amounts that each class. recreation and any other 10,000/100l 1 will interfere. with use usoagect primar y coliform anr for secondary contact Oil and floacine substancesa contact recreation follfon0 ecrea iion or ,.. 4 anA she)lfishing for 2,0001iOOmi f crcation or, 4 1 residue attributable to m-~~arketc purposes ~fecal colifori sewage, industrial wastes or market purposes other wastes, nor visible oil Class II All wate-s not primarily an a f hot less ---- ----- --lone n film nor globules of grease. for recreational purposes, than 30 per cent saturation ti with other substoneca lherml Diharen 8: No dis- shellfish culture or during any week of the or wastes . 6 cha wtanich ill be inuriou - the development of fish- year. provided such saturn- to fishlife or make the waters life tion levels insure adequate unsaf or unsuttabl for any oxygen to support fish and besr unatc dOrerm'ned for the shellfish life at all timee. epecific vt-rs which are aseigned to each class. Notes: 1) A minimum of five examinations are required. 2) Standard to be met during all periods of disinfection. 3) The Class 11 standard applies to Toxic wastes, oil, deleterious substances, colored or other wastes, or thermal discharges 4) ... that will be injurious to edible fish or shellfish or the culture or propagation thereof, or which in any manner shall adversely affect the flavor, color, odor or sanitary condition thereof or impair the waters for any beat usage as derarmintd for the specific waters which are assigned to this class. 5) ...in sufficient amounts to prevent survival of fish life or impair the waters for any other best usage as determined for :he specific waters which are assigned to the class. 6) ...in sufficient amounts to be injurious to edible fish and shellfish, or the culture or propagation thereof, or whlth shall in any manner affect the flavor, color, odor, or sanitary condition of such fish or shellfish so as to injuriously affect the sale thereof, or which shall cause any Injury to the public and private shellfisheries of this state. 7) Applicable co all marine classifications. 8) Applicable to all miarine classficaclons except Class II, see "TOXIC WASTES AND DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCES" and Note 3. TABLE 27 CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR GROUNDWATERS Standards Classification Best UsaRe Condition I Condition II Class GA - Fresh potable (The water table is an unconsolidated deposit (The water table is in consolidated rock, or water supply 15 feet or more thick, of which 10 feet or the water table is in an unconsolidated deposit more is saturated.) of which less than 10 feet is saturated.) Biological - none in amounts to render Bacterial - 50 coliform/100 ml, arithmetic average water detrimental to public health, of 4 or more samples in 30 day period - safety and welfare. 50 coliform/100 mlin not more than 20% of olor -0nis.samples in 30 days. Color - 50 units. Odor - 33 nil sample diluted to 200 ml with Biological - none in amounts to render water unsafe odor free water has no detectable odor. [ or otherwise objectionable. Chemical Color - 15 units Ass 1.5 mg/l Fe 0.6 [ Odor - 70 ml diluted to 200 ml with odor free water As 0.1 Pb 0.10 has no detectable odor. Be 2.0 Mn 0.6 Cd 0.02 NO3 20.0 (N) Chemical CCE 0.4 Phen. 0.002 [ C1 500. Se 0.02 ABS . 1.0 mg/l Fe 0.3 mg/i Cr 0.10 Ag 0.1 I As 0.05 Pb 0.05 Cu 0.4 S04 500. r Ba 1.0 Mn 0.3 CN 0.4 TDS 000 Cd 0.01 NO3 10.0 (N) F 3.0 Zn 0.6 CCE 0.2 Phen. 0.001 C1 250 Se 0.01 pH 6.5 - 8.5 I Cr 0.05 Ag 0.05 Fe + Mn 0.6 mg/l Cu 0.2 S04 150 [ ' CN 0.2 TDS 500 F 1.5 Zn 0.3 pit 6.8 8.5 Fe + Mn 0.3 mg/l Class GSA , Saline water for None in such manner or amount as to potable mineral impair the waters best usage. waters, for conversion to fresh potable water, or as raw material for manufacture of NaCl. Class OSB Saline water of None which are detrimental to 1,000 mg/l Cl-, public health, safety or welfare. 2,000 mg/I total State permit required. dissolved solids, or greater, for disposal of wastes. *< 0 V4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C WESTCHESTER -LEGEND /SB t SA- SHELLFISHING ff�JJBSB- SWIMMING SC- FISHING - SD- OTHER I - FISHING s 7r-OTHER QUESIGE NAYSSA ~~~ -~l- IS~~~~~~~LANNIGAEA(7 NEW~~~~~~~ Y O R BAY ---~~ASFIGURED1 VI-5 WESTCHE ER LONG ISLAND SOUND S~~~~~NSA SUFOL H ~ ~ ~- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~LGNDSA StaUFOMLes Se ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SA-SELI-IG SA~~~~~~~~~~~~III~ 8 SeIMN ESTae SC- FISHLANING CAREFIATIN FOR JONES ~~~~~~~AINLET WAER LEGENDStatutIGUe Mile - / ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BLOCK __ _ _ _ _ _ - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ISLAND z I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SOUND -~~~~~~~~~~~S PLNNN AE (7 R~~~~~SA SAYLFSHN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SCa S8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~DhI~f SB- PLANNING ARSGEA N.17 OL �.SC-SELFISHING CSSFcalINSFO MARINE WATERS FIGURE 21 H~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~R ~~~~~~~~~WSCHETRIt . ~ COMMISSIONLSIIAIN 'D~~~~~~iJ~2 B-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~82 B2 NAVINTRSATEO SANDITATURIVAL New York City Waters Series; Article 16, Suffolk County Waters Series; and Article 18, Upper East River and Long Island Sound within Queens, Bronx and Westchester counties, of Title 6 of the New York State Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations. Groundwater classifications are site specific, and depend on salinity and aquifer dimensions. All fresh groundwaters are classified as a source of potable water supply. The Interstate Sanitation District covers parts of three states. The ISC has established a system of uniform classifications and standards, which are different from, but compatible with the individual State systems. These classifications are shown in Figure 22. VI.2. Revisions to Standards and Classifications Water body classifications are periodically reviewed and, if warranted, classifications are changed. The Arthur Kill (from mile point 2.0 to mile point 12.9), the Harlem River (south of the George Washington Bridge), and the East River (from mile point 0.3 to mile point 12.3) have been reclassified from Class II waters to Class SD waters. Area reclassification hearings for fresh waters were held in 1974 and are pending review and adoption. Marine water reclassification hearings are to be held in 1977. Standards are also periodically reviewed by the Department of Environmental Conservation and, if warranted, modified. The groundwater standards are presently being considered for modification. Some issues which may be considered in future reclassification hearings include: 1. Reclassification of shellfish waters to be "SB'7 waters in areas such as those affected by non-point sources, with no prospects of * ~~~being made safe for the taking of shellfish. VI- 9 2. Some lakes on Long Island are essentially exposed groundwater, and standards for groundwater, as well as surface water, could be applied. 3. water could be reclassified to "N11. This no-discharge classification has been recently developed. 4. Streams can be considered for trout stream classificiation or upgrading. Standards are periodically reviewed by the Department of Environ- mental Conservation and, if warranted, modified. The groundwater standards are presently being considered for modification. VI.3. Special Designations VI.3.a. Anti-Degradation Statement On May 7, 1970, the New York State Water Resources Commission adopted the following anti-degradation statement: "It is recognized that certain waters of New York State possess an existing quality which is better than the classi- fication standards assigned thereto. The quality of these waters will be maintained unless and until it has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation that other uses and different standards are justifiable as a result of necessary economic or social development. To accomplish this objective, all proposed new or increased sources of pollution will be required to provide the best practical degree of waste treatment to maintain these waters at this higher quality. In addition, there will be furnished to the Federal Water Quality Administration, U. S. Department of the Interior, such information as is -needed to enable the VI-10 Secretary of the Interior to fulfill his responsibilities under the Federal law. Water which does not meet the assigned classification will be improved to meet the standards." VI.b. Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers The Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System was established in 1972 by an Act of the Legislature (Chapter 869, Laws of 1972) to provide for the protection of certain selected streams and their immediate environs. Such streams are to possess outstanding natural, scenic, historic, ecological and recreational values. Streams included in the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System receive strict water qulaity classifications, non-degradation protection, as well as protec- tion from incompatible land uses. Wild Rivers flow through undeveloped areas. These may be found only in regions such as the Adirondacks. Scenic Rivers flow through areas largely undeveloped or developed for agriculture, forest manage- ment or other dispersed human activities. Scenic Rivers should have limited road access and be free of diversion and impoundments except for log dams. Recreational Rivers are easily accessible, may have development in the river area, and may have diversions or impoundments. Generally, corridor widths for Wild Rivers are one-half mile from each bank and for Recreational Rivers, 330 feet. Various management controls may be established within these areas. A 5-mile section of the Connetquot River within the Connetquot River State Park was designated a Recreational River on May 7, 1973. A 6.25 mile section and a 3.0 mile section of the Carmans River were, respectively, designated Scenic and Recreational Rivers on July 7, 1974. Study reports have been prepared on a 1-mile headwater section of VI-Il the Connetquot and a 3-mile section of estuary. A 3/4-mile headwater section is being proposed as an additional section of Recreational River. Sections of Tibbetts Brook, the Bronx River and the Harlem River have also been studied, but no designations are proposed. The Nissequogue and Peconic Rivers have been suggested for study. VI.c. Coastal Zone The coastal waters and adjacent land areas of the State are being studied under the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. The Great Lakes, the tidal Hudson and the Marine waters are included in the program. This three-year program will result in a management plan for the coastal zone, and will include: 1. An identification of the boundaries of the coastal zone, subject to the management program; 2. A definition of what shall constitute permissible land and water uses within the coastal zone, especially those which have a direct and significant impact on the coastal waters; 3. An inventory and designation of areas of particular concern within the coastal zone; 4. An identification of the means by which the State proposes to exert control over the land and water uses referred to in Item 2., including a listing of relevant constitutional provisions, legislative enact- ments, regulations and judicial decisions; 5. Broad guidelines on priority of uses in particular areas, including specifically those uses of lowest priority; 6. A description of the organizational structure proposed to implement the management program, including the responsibilities and inter- relationships of local, areawide, State, regional and interstate agencies in the management process. VI-12 VII. SEGMENT ANALYSIS - WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENTS VII. 1. WATER QUALITY LIMITING SEGMENTS Some areas of the Atlantic Ocean/Long Island Sound planning area contain waters that are extremely vulnerable to pollution or waters that are overburdened by discharges. These areas, which require extraordinary abatement measures, require additional technical evaluation, require tailored planning, or require some other atypical measure, are termed "Water Quality Limiting Segments". In more concise terms, a water quality limiting segment is: "Any segment where it is known that water quality does not meet applicable water quality standards and/or is not expected to meet applicable water quality standards even after the application of the effluent limitations required by sections 301 (b)(1)(A) and 301 (b)(1)(B) of the Act." The effluent limitations of sections 301 (b)(1)(A) and 301 (b)(1)(B) of PL 92-500 require that publicly owned treatment works provide at least secondary treatment and that all other point discharges provide at least the best practical treatment currently available (BPT) as defined by USEPA for each of several discharge categories. An "effluent limiting segment," in contrast to a water quality limiting segment, is: "Any segment where it is known that water quality is meeting and will continue to meet applicable water quality standards or where there is adequate demonstration that water quality will meet applicable water quality standards after the application of the effluent limitations required by sections 301(b)(11)(A) and 301 (b)(1)(B) of the Act." All waters of the Atlantic Ocean/Long Island Sound Planning Area which receive a significant discharge have been classified to be either water quality limiting or effluent limiting. The water quality limited segments, VII-1 1. Arthur Kill-Kill Van Kull 9o Port Jefferson Hbr. 2. Upper New York Bay 10. Peconic R.-Flanders Bay 3. East River-Harlem River 11. Sag Harbor 4. Western Long Island Sount 12. Moriches Bay 5. Byram River-Port Chester Hbr. 13. Great South Bay 6. Manhasset Bay 14. Middle Bay 7. Hempstead Harbor 15. Hempstead Bay 8. Huntington Harbor 16. Long Island Ground water are located on Figure 23 and detailed in Table 28. Intermittent streams (i.e. streams which periodically go dry, or streams in which the MA7CD/10 yr flow is less than 1.Ocfs with a MA7CD/10 yr stream flow to wastewater flow ratio no greater than 8:1) are potentially critical areas of water quality concern, and are also considered water quality limiting. Discharges to intermittent streams must meet the discharge criteria of the NYSDEC policy governing discharges to intermittent waterways (Appendix 0). Segment classifications will continue to be reconsidered as additional information and data are collected, as permits are issued and as planning continues under Section 201, 208 and 303(e) of PL 92-500. The State's "Continuing Planning Process", submitted to USEPA on February 15, 1973 designated only the Groundwaters of Long Island to be water quality limiting. There are now 16 segments that are considered to be water quality limiting. These designations are based on the results of various water quality studies; sampling programs; water quality predictive models for the East River, Hempstead Harbor, Manhasset Bay and New York Harbor; and a tidal average (advective-dispersive) model for the entire metropolitan area. More complex and realistic models for these and other areas are being developed through the 208 areawide waste treatment management programs (see Sections II 4.f and II.4.g), and will aid in refining segment classifications. VII-2 WESTCHESTER H~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~POTJFESN~ HARBOR AR~~~~~~~~~~~~~~hUR~~~~~~~~~~~~ KILL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~FGR 23ELM7 TABLE 28 WATER QUALITY LIMITED SEGMENTS 0 Principanl S,,.r.nat Probliems After TP Sourccsl Reason Arthur Kill-Kill Van Kull Chronic dissolved oxygen Municlpal The point discharges fron Staten deficits aigr:avnated by Industrial Island to this segment are minor thernal discharges Thermal compared to inflow from Ncw Jers.y Combined sewers streams,, the lUpper Harbor, and Upper New York Harbor New Jersey point dischar eos. New Jersey point Treatment beyond secondary will be discharges needed in the general area, but the need for extraordinary treatment of Staten Island discharges is not apparent. Further study and coordination between New York and New Jersey are to be accomplished through 208 and other programs. Oil slicks Tank 'arms (primarily BPT is expected to ameliorate this New Jerscy) condition. Spills and combined Indus:rial sewers may persist in causing Combined sewers occasional problems. Upper New York Harbor Coliforms Combined sewers Dry weather discharges are to be abated Dissolved oxygen deficits Municipal Combined overflows will persist1 in back water areas causing coliform and back water Potential for algal blooms. problems. The volumes of municipal discharges to this area provide the potential need for nutrient removal. Industrial discharges to municipal systems in both New York and New Jersey create the need to investigate special trea.ment and pretreatment requirement.;. East River-Harlem River Coliforms Municipal Municipal discharge to the Eastler Potential dissolved Therlal are voluminous, but unluss oxygen deficits Comb:.ned sewers nitrification establishis, diss d Potential for algal blooms Inflow and oxygen deficits are not expected infiltration after BPT. Combined sewers and bypasses are to cause coniform problems in the rivers and the Western Sound. With limited space for expansion, combined sewers, and large discharge volumes, nutrient removal must be thoroughly investigated to evaluate the cost effectiveness of nutrient removal. Western Long Island Sound Coliforms Combined sewers East River flows on a tidal and Algal bloom Storm sewers density gradient basis are not well Potential dissolved East River inflow defined, but East River influences oxygen deficits and combined discharges have the potential of causing periodic oxygen deficits or algal blooms. The relative contribution of municipal discharges which discharge to the segment are such that thorough investigations must be made to evaluate tlhe cost effectiveness of extraordinary treatment. Eyram River Dissolved oxygen deficits Port Chester STP Relocation of the Port Chester outfall Connecticut sources to the Long Island Sound will allow for reclassification of the segment as effluent limiting. With the present discharge location EFT would be inadequate. Manhasset Bay Coliform Westarn Sound Shellfishing areas are closed because Algal blooms Stormwater of high coliform counts following Oxygen deficits Municipal. rains. A feasibility study of runoff control is needed. Nutrient levels are elevated by discharge to the segment and by ambient levels i the Sound. Under present con ,s the cost effectiveness of nutriZ removal fur boy discharges is counsidered margiin.nl; with i:ilnled sewcraze cxtraordluary treatmlont or out of Lay dischargue will be 1l'ceded, iertpstcd IlHirbor Cl llform Wesntrn Sound Simillar to M:lnhasel;t lay, but with Al.-:: lI bi,,geis Stornr.aiiter the S-iund hia..uv lesas rTclarive ixygren Lttli vtra M, Icltpll illflulence and the exilhLln;r ne,xd for VII-4 oextri.,rdinolry trlclltiiuL tit Clen C io,. TABLE (Cont.) Principal Serment Problems After B[r, Sources Reason Hluntington Hlarbor' Potential algal blooms Municipal Expansion of the HuntinLgcon S(iwer District would require extraordinary treatment or alternate discharge locations. Port Jefferson Harbor Coliform Municipal Shellfish grounds are closed due Algal blooms Industrial primarily to storm runoff and Thermal commercial and recreational port activities. Thermal effect has yet to be studied in detail. Occasional algal blooms occur. Eparnsion of the existing sewer district would be expected to require extraordinary treatment or an alternate discharge location. Peconic River Algal blooms Municipal The series of impoundments along the Coliform. Duck tarms river provide evidence of eutrophic Non-poinr conditions. Further study of the Institutional system is needed. Sag Harbor Dissolved oxygen deficits Sag Hatrbor (V) Discharge beyond the Sag Harbor Algal blooms breakwater would result in precautionary closure of a shellfish area. The discharge is therefore to be within the breakwater where A!:T for BOD removal and TKN reduction are considered to be cost effective. Moriches Bay Algal blooms Duck farms Algal blooms occur within the bay affecting swimming and oyster growth. BPT at duck farms is impractical as dry farming will be rec,tired as BAT. Flushing of the bay is liniced by siltation at the bay inlet. Non-point source control is needed. Great South Bay Potential algal blooms Municipal This Bay is a unique source Non-point sources providing a large percentage of the nation's marketable shellfish. While the water is now of excellent quality, algal problems in adjacent bays and at shore indicate the potential for nutrient enrichment of this shallow bay with poor circulation. Long Island Groundwaters Nitrate contamination Non-point sources Nassau and Suffolk Counties use Water supply depletion including: septic groundwater for water supply, and Saltwater intrusion tanks/cesspools, AWT is required to protect these farm/lawn fertilize-rs waters from nitrates, trace Depletion through substances and other contaminations. water supply usage Middle Bay Potential algal blooms Municipal Municipal discharges are considered Non-point to be a substantial source of nutrients to this bay. Alternatives of advanced waste treatment and/or ocean disposal are to be considered. Hempstead Bay Algal blooms Municipal Occasional dissolved oxygen Dissolved oxygen deficits Non-point contravention anrd algal blooms presently occur. VII-5 Combined sewer overflows and stormwater discharges, are significant in these water quality limited segments. They cause the closure of shellfishing areas and bathing beaches, and frequently contain oil, debris, sediment, nutrients and organic loadings. These sporadic discharges are extremely difficult to quantify or model, but wet weather sampling dramatically shows the significant effects on water quality. The opportunity to limit algae growth through nitrogen removal at municipal treatment facilities exists. Algal blooms in water quality limited segments interfere with bathing and boating, can reduce shell- fish productivity and, upon decay, cause oxygen depletion. Nitrogen removal, on the other hand, requires extensive treatment facilities, added operational costs, additional chemical and power requirements, and an increased volume of sludge requiring disposal. Ocean disposal is an alternative to nitrogen removal, but this is also costly and disruptive. Because of the significance of wet weather discharges and the uncertainties in algae growth control, requirements for treatment in excess of BPT have not been definitely established for most discharges to area water quality limited segments. It is expected that advancements in wet weather discharge technologies and algae control technologies, in combination with 208 activities, will eventually provide a practical basis for development of statewide, basin wide or areawide plans or policies for nutrient removal and wet weather pollutant discharge abatement. In the interum, the needs for extraordinary treatment will continue to be primarily established only for new or modified treatment, facilities on a case-by-case basis. VTI.2. CLOSED SHELLFISHING WATERS A significant portion of the marine resources in this major basin are classified as shellfishing waters. Standards of water quality for shellfishing waters are very stringent, as are the Federal Food and Drug VII-6 * ~WESTCHESTER / P00~~~~~~~~~ca. LEGE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~NDc B RONXl! AR~~~~~~~~~~~~~~QEEAS NLASSAUIE FOR~~~~~~~KY ATLANTIC NT OCEAN-Ll ON PLANNING AREA (17) ~~~ ,~~~~~~~ ~FIGURE 24 VII-7 WESTCHE ER cOVA-~- W3 ~~ LONG ISLAND SOUND NASSAU plI.-A~ paci He~~p ugh AEA CLSooIE 0 ttteNj S~~~~~~~~~~~ S A ..,r L.,,l~~~~~~l;;;~~~;;.-$.~~~~�L-1Y~~~~Crurr~~~lll-r��ly�AI.. L 7:K! ~~�I �~~~ J,.L.,rs.., K-p~,i~flfli I - - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SOUND~ GARDINERS -A- LIT LE PE )NIC GREAT SoA HOLbor BAY Rich.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ atia ie BnY Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cl Alberta' noy LEGEND ATLANTIC OCEAN L.I. SOUND CLOSE SHELLF INPLANNING AREA (17) AREAS CLASSI~~~~~~~ FIGUED2 AK3 ~FOR SHELLFISHING BUT CLOSED Statute Miles - Ki~~lometers Scale CLOSED SHELLFISHING3 AREAS DJL -177 FIGURE 27 ORK U/76 Administration's criteria for the taking of shellfish for marketing purposes. Figures 24, 25 and 26 show those areas which are classified for shellfishing, but are closed to shellfishing because of standards violations and/or for potential shellfish contamination. Descriptions of areas closed to shellfishing, which include both areas classified for shellfishing and areas that are not classified for shellfishing, are included in the Appendix. Shellfishing waters are closed because of combined sewage discharges, inadequate disinfection of treated municipal sewage, stormwater runoff and other non-point sources. Even the proximity of a sewage treatment plant ourfall line or a docking facility are causes for closure to insure safety in the marketing of a raw food product. VII.3. Closed Bathing Beaches Swimming waters are tested regularly by city and county health departments during the summer. Bathing beaches are closed and reopened on the basis of these bacteriological tests. Complete chemical analyses are conducted at selected sampling stations. Combined sewer discharges, sewage treatment plant bypasses, raw discharges, and inadequate disinfection have caused chronic swimming restrictions in some metropolitan waters. In other areas, occasional closures are made after heaby rains. Some temporary closures have been made as the result of sewer breaks, illegal discharges or temporary bypasses during construction. Figures 27, 28 and 29 represent bathing beach conditions in 1974. Some of these closures or poor quality areas have been regularly restricted; other areas were closed for short periods. These figures provide a pictorial overview of typical conditions. VII-10 > '\Yk~~~~~~~~~~ 1i WESTCHESTER U QUotE: THSeSAI. 'JrJ Jre r ~~~closed 9/4-9)/S (ol1owing 6~ jocheS sf raici oc / 9/2-9/3, whdch ca.-sed 4~~ ~~~~~ bypasses. - 1 LEGEND / W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. K BA 9. WATERS CLASSIFIED FORE A BRONX ' SWIMMING BUT CLOSED OR CONSIDERED UNsAFE 4PIN 1974.AA1 V-11 I' i I I! O~~~~UEENS ( ASSAJ 1 �\ . i~~~~~~~~~~~ROKY - PEY - -- ALNI I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S,.. ISAN ~~~~~~~~-- FIUR 27 8e OI WESTCNSER * 1~j~2 >R ALONGTISLOCAND-~t SOUND ~~ WATERS C~~~~~~~~~LAKSFED O H~~~SIMN U LSDNuntingon PANAMOK HNINGTON4 eck ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ WTR CLASSIEDFRCO D SW M NG AREA PatL 775 ONLY FA~~~~~~~IRSULITY 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~LC ISLAND -4 -------- - - - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -~SUN IMUNTHA AEOF RE A T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~FGR 29THM While many bathing areas have been restricted, there are many more areas that are open to bathing. Much of the area water is not merely acceptable, but of excellent quality. VII.4. Water Quality Assessments The following water quality assessments are provided for bays, rivers and water areas from Raritan Bay, around Long Island in a clock- wise direction, to Jamaica Bay. The assessments are based on various study reports, sampling and monitoring records, and mathematical model results. Assessments are fairly complete for some areas, but for other areas, there is a dearth of information. VII.4.a. Raritan Bay Raritan Bay is located between Staten Island, the New Jersey Shore, Sand Hook Bay and Lower New York Bay. The New York-New Jersey State Line divides the Bay. The Raritan River and the Arthur Kill are major tributaries. The Bay is shallow, averaging less than 10 or 15 feet in most areas. A 600-800 foot wide navigation channel, dredged to a depth of about 35 feet, connects the Lower Yew York Bay with the western tributaries. The tidal range is 4 feet, but tidal currents are relatively weak, being generally less than 0.5 knots. The system is not well mixed and density currents tend to follow shorelines and bottom contours. The greater body tends to sluggishly rotate with the tides. Available 1974 data indicate that dissolved oxygen is at fair levels in Raritan Bay, averaging between 4 and 6 mg/l in summer. Fecal coliform concentrations are more variable, going from less than 100 to 9000 per 100 ml. VII-14 The flux of pollutants from New York Harbor has an effect on Raritan Bay, where beaches and shellfishing beds are closed due to high coliform counts. Also, nutrients from New York-New Jersey sources are believed to be the cause of eutrophication problems that are beginning to crop up in Raritan Bay. VII.4.b. Arthur Kill-Kill Van Kull The Arthur Kill is a tidal channel between New York and New Jersey on the western shore of Staten Island. The Arthur Kill connects Raritan Bay and the lower West Newark Bay. The Fresh Kills in New York, and the Elizabeth River and Rahway River in New Jersey, are major tributaries. The Kill Van Kull is a tidal channel between New York and New Jersey, on the northern shore of Staten Island. The Kill Van Kull connects the lower east end of Newark Bay (directly east of the Arthur Kill) with Upper New York Bay. There are no major tributaries. Dredged navigation channels, 35 feet deep and 500-600 feet wide, follow both waterways. Maximum tidal currents average 1.0-1.5 knots. Water quality in the Arthur Kill is poor. In the summer of 1975, dissolved oxygen averaged 35 percent of saturation versus 31 percent in 1974. The Kill Van Kull is better, at 41 percent in 1975 and 40 percent in 1974. Fecal coliform concentration averaged 4,284 per 100 ml in 1975 in Arthur Kill, and 5,749 in Kill Van Kull. These are Class II waters; and, therefore, have no coliform standard. Dissolved oxygen in Arthur Kill often drops to zero in summer, and averages less than 1 mg/l, in places, for several months at a time. Winter values are much higher, reaching 8 mg/1 at times. Fecal coliforms vary widely, from 100 per 100 ml to 15,000 per 100 ml. On occasion algal blooms occur, causing short term dissolved oxygen increases. VII-15 The Arthur Kill is heavily loaded with industrial wastes and thermal inputs from power plants and industries along its shore. In summer, the water temperature reaches 850F, worsening dissolved oxygen conditions by increasing biological activity, and decreasing the solubility of oxygen in the water. Oil slicks are often visible on the surface of the Arthur Kill, as well as the rest of the harbor. These are attributable to industrial sources, heavy waterway traffic and combined sewer overflows. This body of water does not have the benefit of vigorous tidal flushing action, so that residence times of pollutants tend to be longer than elsewhere in the harbor, with consequently worse conditions. Although there are several major oil terminals on the New York shore, most pollution there is attributable to New Jersey sources, so that abatement in New York City will not have a profound effect on water quality there. VII.4.c. New York Harbor New York Harobr comprises the Upper New York Bay, the Lower New York Bay and the Narrows, which connects the two Bays. The Hudson River (which terminates at the Battery in Manhattan), the East River and Kill Van Kull terminate at the Upper Bay. The Lower Bay joins the Raritan Bay to the east, Rockaway Inlet to the west, and the Atlantic Ocean to the southeast. Lower New York Bay has substantially better water quality than Upper New York Bay because the Lower Bay has fewer pollutant sources and mixing occurs witht ocean water. In summer 1975, the Lower Bay averaged 82.4 percent of saturation versus 50.8 percent for Upper Bay. The corres- ponding average concentrations are 6.3 mg/1 Lower Bay and 4.0 mg/l Upper Bay. A similar difference is apparent in mean fecal coliform VII-16 concentrations, with Upper Bay averaging 2,738 per 100 ml and Lower Bay 136 per 100 ml. Fecal coliform concentrations vary from less than 100 per 100 ml to more than 11,000 per 100 ml, mostly due to combined sewer overflows. After a rainfall, there is a marked increase in total coliforms at nearby beaches. These high coliform concentrations are sometimes persistent. Nuisance problems develop in "back water" areas such as the Gowanus Canal. These waters are not subject to much tidal flushing action. Sludge accumulations from combined sewer overflows or raw discharges decompose, exerting an oxygen demand and causing foul ordors. In some cases, these waters are essentially extensions of the sewer system. An area contiguous to the Lower Harbor, but outside the planning area, presenting a unique problem is the New York Bight. The New York- New Jersey metropolitan area has disposed of sewage sludge and dredged spoil in the Bight for many years. Until the last ten years, limited information has been available as to the consequences of disposal of sludge and spoils in the Bight. Studies conducted by the Middle Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Center, Sandy Hook Laboratories, indicate that disposal of dredging spoils and sewage sludges has had a significant effect on the living resources of the Bight. Heavy metals have accumulated in the sediments directly receiving the sludges and spoils and have been measured at 100 times background values of apparently uncontaminated sediments at areas surrounding the designated disposal site. High coliform bacteria concentration levels were also evident throughout the dumping zone. A point of concern regarding this area is that there has apparently been some outward spread of contamination from the designated disposal site. ,VII-17 However, the October 1975 report from NOAA to EPA indicated no evidence of massive migration of sewage sludge toward beaches in New York or New Jersey, and recommended that the present site not be relocated. The problem of sewage sludge disposal from the New York-New Jersey metropolitan area is complicated by the sheer volumes of sludge produced. Until such time as a more effective way of handling the hugh volumes of sludge are developed, ocean disposal will have to continue. However, this activity should be limited as much as possible, particularly in regard to contaminated dredged material. The responsibility of permit- ting and enforcing regulations regarding ocean disposal lies with EPA. The February 1976 Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Ocean Dumping of Sewage Sludge recommended: (1) continued useof the existing sewage sludge dump site in the Bight Apex; (2) designation of an alter- nate dump site in the northern area of the Bight for future use if necessary; (3) that the existing dump site and nearby sensitive recre- ational and marine areas (Hudson Shelf Valley) near Long Island and New Jersey be closely monitored for potential hazards to public health or water quality; and (4) that upon confirmation of such hazards, permittees be required to use the alternate dump site. VII.4.d. East River-Harlem River The East River connects the Upper New York Bay and the Long Island Sound. Hell Gate and Wards Island are located at the East River-Harlem River confluence about the mid-lenght of the East River. The river is commonly divided, at this area, into the Lower East River (Bay to Hell Gate) and the Upper East River (Hell Gate to the Sound). The East River is a "hydraulic channel". Unlike most tidal currents, the currents in the East River are caused by the differences in elevation of two reservoirs--the Sound and the Upper Bay. The tidal stage of the VII-18 Sound happens to be high when the Bay is low and vice-versa. The result is that water rushes from the Sound to the Bay and then as the tides reverse, rushes in the other direction. These rapid currents limit the growth of fixed plants, algae and other aquatic life. It is suspected that the biochemical oxidation of nitrogen compounds will continue to be suppressed by the currents. The Harlem River connects the East River and the Hudson River, and bounds Manhattan Island. Newtown Creek is a relatively short tidal tributary to the Lower East River. The Bronx River and Westchester Creek discharge to the Upper East River, but discharges from the muni- cipal sewers of New York (treated, combined and raw discharges) comprise the major fresh water inflow to the rivers. Water quality varies from generally poor in the Harlem and Lower East Rivers to fair in the Upper East River. In summer of 1975, dissolved oxygen in the Lower East River averaged 32 percent of saturation as opposed to 34 percent in 1974. The Upper East River also declined from 43 percent in 1974 to 40 percent in 1975, as did the Harlem River from 38 percent to 34 percent. The 1972 five-year moving average for these rivers (which includes up to 1974 data) are 33 percent LER, 45 percent UER and 38 percent HR showing the gradual downward trend. The corres- ponding dissolved oxygen concentrations are 2.7 mg per liter HR, 2.5 mg/l LER and 3.2 mg/l UER. Fecal coliform mean concentrations ( organisms per 100 ml) for the summer of 1975 were 7,982 for the Harlem River, 6,215 for the Lower East River and 2,831 for the Upper East River. The values vary greatly with location and time, particularly with respect to rainfall, varying from less than 100 to much more than 8,000. The lower East River and part of the Harlem River are Class II waters and, therefore, have no coliform standard. VII-19 While algal blooms are not a persistent problem in these waters, it is estimated that 170,000 pounds per day of nitrogen compounds are discharged to the East River, possibly having a carry-over eutrophication effect on W~estern Long Island Sound. Eight major power plants, having a total capacity of 45 x 109 BTU/HR, discharge cooling water to the East River. This waste heat may reduce the waste assimilative capacity of the East River by 10 percent. One of three beaches in the Upper East River is closed due to high coliform, levels, as are potentially productive shellfish beds in Long Island Sound, which are believed to be affected by New York City coliform sources. Due to the complexities of the problems throughout the New York City metropolitan area and the magnitude of waste loads discharged to these waters, the entire harbor complex and East River-Harlem River systems are classified water quality limiting. Surveys and sophisticated mathematical models will be performed on these waters as part of the New York City 208 areawide waste management study. VII.4.e. Long Island Sound Long Island Sound is one of the nation's unique and irreplaceable natural resources. The Sound is almost a fully enclosed arm of the Atlantic Ocean with a surface area of approximately 1300 square miles and nearly a thousand miles of coastline through parts of Rhode Island, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York, and the entire north shore of Long island, New York. The majority of Long Island Sound waters within New York State, except water between the Queens and the Bronx, New York, which are classified SB, are classified SA for the taking of shellfish and primary and secondary contact recreation. Usages of the Sound are many and varied and include commercial and sport fisheries, VII-20 recreational boating, bathing, commercial shipping, wastwater disposal, dredge disposal and wildlife habitats. Movements of water within major estuaries are complex. The Sound displays estuarine characteristics in its western and central parts and embayment characteristics in its eastern third. The minimum tidal range and maximum tidal currents occur at the eastern end and the maximum tidal range and minimum tidal currents at the western end. Circulation is controlled principally by tidal currents modified by fresh water inflow, weather conditions and topography. The circulation pattern of surface and near surface waters if fairly well defined, but relatively little is known about deep circulation. Surface tidal current patterns in the central and western Sound are elliptical and counter-clockwise in direction. At the eastern end, surface water flows out of the Sound into Block Island Sound, while more dense and saline bottom. waters flow into Long Island Sound. At the western end, surface water from the East River flows into the Sound and bottom waters move into the East River. Lack of quantified information on inflows and outflows on the western end of the Sound is a major gap in knowledge necessary to understand and manage this portion of the Sound. The Sound has been classified as a moderately-stratified estuary, in that ocean waters and fresh waters do not mix completely. The well oxygenated, cold, dense marine waters remain unmixed below the surface throughout a large area of the eastern Sound. The less oxygenated, warmer, lighter fresh water enters mostly in the eastern end from the Connecticut and Thames Rivers, remains near the surface, a-ad is flushed out to sea rather rapidly, thus producing minimal salinity dilution.' This physical two-layer water movement system influences the Sound's chemical VII-21 regime. It tends to flush out to sea the lighter suspended pollutants from inland sources and to bring up nutrient-rich waters from the bottom. The waters of Long Island Sound and its embayments vary greatly in water quality. The Sound proper, within New York State jurisdiction, is generally of high quality, except in the extreme western section of Long Island Sound (particularly the area from the Throgs Neck Bridge to a point between Hempstead Bay and the Oyster Bay complex). Shellfish beds from Oyster Bay westward have been closed due to bacterial contam- ination. In addition, nutrients have caused nuisance algal blooms which can impact bathing beaches and interfere with other usages of the Sound. Dissolved oxygen levels in this zone are also depressed with summer averages of approximately 5 ppm. From Hempstead Harbor eastward to the Connecticut River, the wat er quality of the Sound improves significantly in a fairly uniform manner. I Major sources of pollution affecting Long Island Sound include municipal and industrial wastes, combined sewer overflows, non-point sources, wastes from pleasure craft and commercial shipping, oil spills, thermal inputs and dredged spoils. The impacted quality of the western Sound is attributed to the carry-over of pollutants from the New York City treatment plants and combined sewers through the East River. An estimated loading of 170,000 lbs/day of nitrogen compounds (as N) is discharged to the East River complex from these plants. While -no significant algae blooms, are evident in the East River, nuisance blooms of algae do occur upon dilution with western Sound waters. While the net transport is not fully understood, the wide seasonal variation in bacteriological quality coincides with and is partially attributed to the seasonal chlorination practices of the City. In addition to New York City loadings, several major waste v~i-29 inputs occur at Mamaroneck, Blind Brook, New Rochelle and Port Chester in Westchester County. Pollution abatement efforts to date have focused almost entirely on the control of municipal and industrial point sources. As these programs are completed, the magnitude of the other sources of pollution, particularly combined sewer overflows and separate stormwater discharges, will become more evident. Spills of oil and hazardous materials can be expected to occur despite the strict regulations regarding the handling and transport of these materials. The effects of dredged spoils deposited in the Sound has not been adequately studied. Permits for the deposition of spoils are under the jurisdiction of the Harbormaster, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The 18 existing dredged spoil sites in the Sound have been cut back to four active sites and this activity has been drastically reduced. Due to the apparent problems in the western portion of the Long Island Sound, the Sound from Throgs Neck to Hempstead Harbor is now being classified as a water quality limiting segment. A better under- standing of this area of the Sound is expected from the modeling proposals of the New York City 208 study, which should identify in greater detail transport of pollutants through the East River. VII.4.f. Bvram River-Port Chester Harbor The Byram River at the border of Westchester County and Connecticut presents one of the worst water quality problems in this study area. Sampling by the Westchester County Health Department from 1971 through 1975 shows that dissolved oxygen (D.0.) and coliform bacteria standards were regularly violated near the mouth of the Byram River. These viola- tions occur both above, at and below the Port Chester STP outfall. Noteworthy, however, is the fact that the worst quality samples were VII-23 consistently taken above the STP outfall on the Byram River. The quality sampling of Port Chester Harbor itself shows that coliform counts are usually above the acceptable standard and batter than the Byram River, as a dilution-mixing effect appears to take place. Just outside of Port Chester Harbor in Long Island Sound, there have been no violations of water quality noted. This stream-harbor system drains a predominently commercial-industrial area and oil, grease and floating solids are occasionally noted in these waters. The Byram River in the lower reaches has a rocky bottom with sludge deposits, mud and debris noted. There is occasional floating scum and the water usually is brown to muddy in color. The streatm current is tidal with depths of from 12 to 19 feet near the mouth. VII.4.g. Blind Brook-Milton Harbor Blind Brook at Rye, New York has a total drainage area of approxi- mately 10.8 square miles and an average discharge of 15.4 cfs. Blind Brook is tidal in the lower reaches with some pooling evident. The stream depth varies from 0.25 to 4.0 feet at the mouth. The channel varies from rocky to sand and gravel with some sludge deposits observed. The bacteriological quality of Blind Brook is marginal. Sampling data taken by the WCHD 1972-74 indicates that the Class I standards are not being violated, but elevated coliform levels were being experienced. Dissolved oxygen concentrations are in general saturated in the headwaters with low concentrations recorded only occasionally at the mouth. There are no major point discharges to the waters of Blind Brook- Milton Harbor. A discontinued landfill located near the Blind Brook STP may be a contribution of leachate to Blind Brook, but the magnitude of the impact from the landfill cannot be estimated-at this time. VII-24 There have been fish kills on two occasions in the area attributable to natural causes. VLL.4.h. Mamaroneck Harbor-Mamaroneck River (Sheldrake River) Guion Creek (Beaver Swamp Brook) The drainage basin of the Mamaroneck River is approximately 23.6 square miles. The rectangular shaped basin contains three (3) principal tributaries; the East Branch, the West Branch and the Sheldrake River. The Mamaroneck River channel is primarily rocky with depth ranging from two to 15 feet at the mouth, with noticeable silt deposits. The lower reaches are tidal with limited flushing. The water color ranges -from slightly to distinctly brown and, on occasion, oil slicks and floating debris are observed. The Sheldrake River is tributary to the Mamaroneck River and is similar to the Mamaroneck River with respect to color, velocity and floating debris observed. The Sheldrake River drains an intensely developed industrial area of Mamaroneck. During periods of heavy rainfall, the Sheldrake River rises quite high and inundates portions of the industrial area and thereby drains much oil and grease to Mamaroneck Harbor by way of the Mamaroneck River. The Mamaroneck-Sheldrake River system is the prime contributor of high bacteria counts in Mamaroneck Harbor; however, such counts are not great enough to warrant closing of beaches. Guion Creek (Beaver Swamp Brook) outlet has also been known to have high bacteria counts. The fact that it drains a swamp area and is subject to stormwater over- flows from sewers are probably causes for these high counts. Upstream on the Mamaroneck River, there are two (2) reservoir systems, one on the Mamaroneck River (Mamaroneck Reservoir) and the other on the Sheldrake River (Sheldrake Lake or Larchmont Reservoir). VII-25 Both have filter plants to treat the water, but neither reservoir is currently used nor has been for the last few years, mainly for economic purposes in that it is cheaper to buy water from New York City. However, both are supposedly on standby status, although personnel from WCHD believe that because of the brown color and turbidity of the reservoirs, it is unlikely either will be put back into operation. Also, the Mamaroneck Reservoir has had periodic high bacteria counts after rains which, in part, may be due to a horse farm operation upstream. The Mamaroneck Harbor itself has been recorded by the WCHD in 1973-74 as having coliform levels near or above the Class SB standards. These coliform levels, however, were much lower than the high coliform and fecal coliform counts recorded at the mouth of the Mamaroneck River. Such high reading of coliform for the harbor may be due, in part, to the occasional bypass of the Mamaroneck STP outfall (i.e., utilization of short outfall to the east basin of Mamaroneck Harbor during wet weather) and storm sewer discharges, aside from the contributing factor of the Mamaroneck River. The Mamaroneck STP outfall passes through Mamaroneck Harbor in getting to its offshore discharge in Long Island Sound. On two occasions in the recent past, this outfall has ruptured, resulting in elevated bacteria counts for a slight period. The harbor is tidal and occasionally floating material such as seaweed has beennoted in the harbor. For reasons previously mentioned, the shellfish area located offshore from Mamaroneck has remained closed, although as recently as last summer (1975), clams have been transferred from this area to less polluted waters off Long Island where, after a few weeks, their harvesting would be allowed. Fish kills have been noted to occur in Mamaroneck Harbor, but investigation determined them to occur from natural causes and not the VII-26 effects of pollution. VII.4.1. Larchmont Harbor-East Creek The Larchmont Harbor area's sewage system comprises a number of pump stations which bypass sewage flow during excessive wet weather. Also, the collection system in this area is old and there are overflow interconnections between the sanitary and storm sewer lines which, likewise, cause discharges of untreated sanitary wastes during wet weather and result in occasional high bacteria counts in the harbor. Otherwise, the bacteria counts in the harbor are low on the average and well within Class SB standards. Larchmont Harbor is tidal and, occasionally, seaweed has been noted floating in the waters. The East Creek is the major stream entering the harbor and sewage discharges have recently been found to occur to this stream due to a cross-connection in the sanitary and storm sewer systems. Also, as this stream passes through a light industrial-commercial area, waste oil and oil from accidental spills have been known to enter the stream through storm sewers during wet weather. Through the actions of the WCHD, such discharges to the East Creek are being corrected. VII.4.1. Echo Bay-Premium Mill Pond Sampling of Echo Bay by the WCHD in 1973-74 has shown coliform levels in the excess of the Class SB standards of these waters. Such results have, on occasion, caused the closing of bathing beaches in the area. The New Rochelle STP overflow, one pump station overflow and sewer line regulators overflow to Echo Bay during the periods of wet weather. The area surrounding Echo Bay is highly urbanized, with many apartment houses which have been the cause of several small oil spills with storm runoff of accumulated spillage. VII-27 Similar to the other systems in the Long Island Sound portion of Westchester, oil discharges have been noted in Pine Brook and high coliform counts recorded in Ferris Brook, both of which drain into Echo Bay. Echo Bay is tidal and occasional seaweed and other floating material have been noted. VII.4.k. New Rochelle Greek The New Rochelle Creek in the Town Dock Road area received the sewage discharges from seven (7) private dwellings. Tests by the WCHD in 1975 showed high coliform counts in the Creek, however, investigations are now underway to serve the area with a pump station through Federal and State funding. In addition, this area has been noted to have floating debris and oil in the water, which seems to be the result of individual dumping. VII.4.1. Lower Harbor-Burling Brook Burling Brook drains a light industrial-commercial area and, as is typical of such an area, oil has been noted in this stream on occasion. The quench water from the New Rochelle incinerator is discharged to this area and causes a gray discoloration to the water. The City of New Rochelle is currently under orders from DEC toabate air pollution from this incinerator and this water pollution will be handled collectively in that DEC order. VLL.4.m. Hutchinson River-Bronx River Although these two streams do not discharge to the Long Is land Sound directly from Westchester County, they do drain a significant area of the county and contribute a pollutional load to the Long Island Sound when they discharge from Bronx County (New York City). Similar VII-28 to the stream systems mentioned previously, the streams drain a heavily developed area and suffer the same types of pollution from oil discharges and untreated sanitary wastes. The Bronx River has a drainage area of approximately 62 square miles located in both Westchester County and New York City. The Hutchinson River has a drainage area of approximately ten square miles and is also located in both Westchester County and New York City. VII.4.n. Little Neck Bay Little Neck Bay is located on the north shore of Long Island on the boundary of Queens and Nassau counties. The Bay is approximately four miles long and one mile wide and has a mean depth of 7.5 feet. The lands contiguous to the shoreline are residential in nature. The southern section of the Bay is occupied by a large boat anchorage. The waters of the Bay are classified SB, which assigns bathing and anyother usages except shellfishing for market as the best usage of waters. Circulation is dominated by tidal exchange, hence exchange of polluted waters from the East River into the Bay propogates a water quality problem within the Bay. Also, effluents from the Belgrave Sewer District, from septic tank failures and discharges from the unsewered Douglaston area of New York City, and raw and combined over- flows from Tallman's Island Sewer District augment the pollutional loadings to the Bay. As the quality of this Bay is primarily dependent on the quality of the water in western Long Island Sound, this Bay is considered effluent limiting for discharges to the Bays. VII-29 VII.4.o. Manhasset Bay Manhasset Bay is located entirely within Nassau County on the north shore of Long Island. It is an open mouth bay, experiencing good tidal flushing except in the head of the Bay where flushing is restricted. The Bay is approximately four miles long and one mile wide with twelve miles of shoreline. The average depth of the Bay is between ten to 15 feet. Tidal rise in the Day is seven feet, resulting in a daily tidal exchange with western Long Island Sound approximately equal to the Bay volume. Although there is substantial tidal exchange, the Bay waters are not completed mixed. However, because of the large tidal exchange, the water quality of the Bay is influenced to a major extent by the quality of western Long Island Sound, particularly in the wide open sections of the Bay where more complete tidal mixing and flushing occur. Manhasset Bay is classified in sectors with the main body and western shore designated SA waters, the Port Washington Cove area SB and the head of the Bay classified SC and I. Manhasset Bay has long been considered one of the best pleasure boat harbors on Long Island Sound due to its favorable physical characteristics and protected waters. Bathing beaches are maintained in the harbor; however, Manorhaven Beach has been found to have excessively high bacterial counts. The shellfish grounds of the Bay have been closed to the taking of shellfish since 1963 due to bacterial contamination. Other pollution problems in the Bay are the periodic nuisance blooms of algae caused by nitrogenous compounds and lowered summer dissolved oxygen levels (3.0 - 5.5 ppm) due to a combination of carry-over in the area from western Long Island Sound waters and existing discharges. Studies of the Bay by Hydroscience, Inc. and Dr. Hugo Freudenthal i of H2M Engineers indicate that the chemical and biological quality of VII-30 the Bay is primarily that quality of water existing in Long Island Sound. Treated waste effluents are discharged to the Bay from Great Neck (V), Great Neck SD and Port Washington SD. These effluents contribute significant -nitrogenous compounds to the Bay. However, without actions in the New York metropolitan area to control nitrogen levels in the western Long, Island Sound, periodic algae problems could be expected in M~anhasset Bay, even without the existing sewer districts. However, proposed expansion can make this nitrogen contribution more significant in the future. Similarly, bacterial water quality and suimner dissolved oxygen levels are not expected to significantly improve without corrective actions on combined sewers and upgrading of the New York City plants on the East River system. The above does -not mean all treatment facilities are adequate in Manhasset Bay. In fact, it is desirable to limit nitrogenous compounds * ~~entering the Bay from point discharges to avoid further worsening of the algal problem, Also, extremely high levels of nutrients and local pollution problems, such as depressed dissolved oxygen levels, exist at the head of the harbor, where flushing is limited, as a result of *the Great Neck SD and Great Neck (V) discharges. The overall solution to the problems in this area may involve upgrading of all existing treatment plants, relocation of discharge points and/or recharge based on the results of the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. As part of this study, a one dimensional link-node (steady state Time Variable Models) will be developed and be used to assess impact of the various alternative abatement measures. Due to the existing water quality problems in Manhasset and expansion of the existing sewer districts, this Bay is now classified water quality limiting, VII-31 VII.4.p. Hempstead Harbor Hempstead Harbor is a north shore harbor in Long Island located 1 in North Hempstead and Oyster Bay townships. The funnel shaped harbor tapers from a width of 0.25 miles at Roslyn to a width of approximately two- miles at Long Island Sound. Bar Beach, a midway bar, divides the harbor into two segments. T'Le southernmost segment ranges in depth from 12 to 25 feet. Tidal induced dispersion provides transport of various constituents discharged within the Harbor to Long Island Sound. Tidal exchange also introduces water quality effects from the Sound into the Harbor. Commercial and industrial activity predominate along the Hempstead Harbor shoreline with little vacant land remaining for development. For classification purposes, the waters of the Hampstead Harbor are basically divided into four regions--inaner, middle, outer and Glen Cove Creek. The inner and outer regions are classified SB, the middle Harbor is classified SA and Glen Cove Creek is classified I. Major point source discharges include municipal wastewater treatment facilities at Glen Cove and Roslyn discharging 5.2 MGD and 0.5 MGD of secondary effluent to the Bay waters respectively. Also the North Hempstead Town Incinerator and landfill introduces pollutants to the Bay. Data collected in August 1973 indicated average dissolved oxygen concentrations in inner Hempstead Harbor are 4.4 mg/l with average diurnal and vertical variations of 1.5 to 2.5 mg/I. The depressed values of dissolved oxygen within the Harbor are primarily the result of background quality levels plus diurnal variations associated with algal photosynthesis and are -not attributed solely to the wastewater treatment plant discharges. Violations of the dissolved oxygen standard of 5.0 mg/l are attributed to the tidal transport of Long Island Sound waters into the VII-32 Harbor. Average dissolved oxygen concentrations of 4.8 mg/l occur in Long Island Sound waters during the critical summer periods. The available nutrients, nitrogen and phosphorus, in combination with proper temperature and sunlight conditions, support the growth of algae in the Harbor. Data indicates the concentration of phosphorus remaining relatively constant on an annual basis with minor decreases evident during the summer months. A background concentration of inorganic nitrogen in the waters of Long Island Sound near Hempstead Harbor is also experienced within Hempstead Harbor with no noticeable change in magnitude. Variations in the concentrations of inorganic nitrogen from 0.5 mg/l during the winter months to 0.1 mg/l during the summer months are observed in both locations. Based on the above, it appears that algal growth in Hampstead Harbor may be limited by the available inorganic nitrogen (ammonia plus nitrate). The problems of algal growth in the future will be alleviated by the control of any future input of inorganic nitrogen sources. The bacteriological quality of the Harbor waters does not consistently comply with the coliform standard required by the SA classification. The entire harbor as well as the waters of Long Island Sound contiguous to the Harbor are presently closed to shellfishing and coliform standards have been exceeded at the Sea Cliff Village Beach. The overall solution to water quality problems in this area may involve upgrading of all existing treatment plants, relocation of discharge points and/or recharge. These alternatives will be assessed by the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. As part of this study, one dimensional link-node (steady state models) will be developed and be used to assess the water quality impact of the various alternative abatement measures. This Bay is now classified water quality limiting, VII-33 VII.4.q. Oyster Bay Complex The Oyster Bay Complex is located on the northern shore of Long Island at the eastern extremity of Nassau County, near the Nassau-Suffolk Line. The complex as defined herein shall included Oyster Bay, as well as Oyster Bay Harbor and Cold Spring Harbor. Oyster Bay Harbor is located in Nassau County; Oyster Bay is divided by the Nassau-Suffolk Line while Cold Spring Harbor is mostly in Suffolk County. Oyster Bay is supplied by marine waters from Long Island Sound. The Bay in turn supplies tidal waters to Oyster Bay Harbor and Cold Spring Harbor. Oyster Bay Harbor is connected to the remainder of the complex by a one-half mile wide inlet located between Plum Point and Cove Point. Depths of up to 50 feet have been measured in this section, whereas the average depth throughout the major portion of the complex is 12 feet. Tidal induced currents provide circulation to the waters. However, the circulation pattern is greatly altered during periods of high winds and, at times, the winds are the most dominant cause of water circulation. In general, the land area is sparsely population with large private homes and estates and much undeveloped land. The major portion of the waters of the Oyster Bay complex are classified SA, which assigns shellfishing for market purposes as the best usage of the waters. Some remote areas of the Bay where circulation is inhibited, are classified I, SC, D and C in accordance with their best usage. The waters of Oyster Bay Harbor support a large population of oysters (CPASSOSTREA VIRGINICA) and hard clams (NERCENARIA NERCENARIA) which are of commercial significance to the area. The major pollutional discharge source to the Oyster Bay Harbor is located in the Village of Oyster Bay. The Oyster Bay Sewer District VII-34 discharges secondary sewage effluent to the Bay. Additional sources of pollutants include a shipyard, an oil depot, a lumber company, sand and gravel companies, and an oyster processing plant. There are four areas of the Bay complex closed to shellfishing. These are (1) around the Oyster Bay SD discharge, (2) Mill Neck Creek, (3) cove west of Plum Point, and (4) southern portion of Cold Spring Harbor. The Oyster Bay Complex is scheduled to be studied and a one dimensional link-node (steady state model) developed and verified as part of the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. This model will be used to evaluate the impact on water quality of the various alternatives to be addressed under the 208 study. VII.4.r. Huntington-Northport Bay Complex The Huntington-Northport Bay Complex is located on the north shore of Long Island and consists of Huntington Bay, Northport Bay, Northport Harbor and Huntington Harbor. The waters of Huntington Bay, Northport Bay and Northport Harbor are classified SA for the taking of shellfish and primary and secondary contact recreation, while Hunting Harbor is classified for secondary contact recreation. The waters of this complex are utilized for shellfishing and is a prime recreational area. Northport Bay is about three square miles in area, with an average depth of 15 feet. The opening to Huntington Bay is restricted by West Beach to a width of approximately one-half mile. Huntington Bay has a surface area of 3.9 square miles and is the deepest part of the complex, with a mean depth of 25 feet. Northport Harbor is a narrow extension of Northport Bay. It has an average depth of eight feet, a surface area of approximately 0.4 square miles and has no defined channel. Water quality of these areas is generally good. VII-35 Huntington Harbor is a small embayment located on the southwest side of Huntington Bay. Yacht clubs, marinas and oil-depots are located on the southern side of the Harbor. The Huntington sewage treatment plant discharges to the south end of Huntington Harbor and is a major contributor of nutrients to the area. This part of the complex has a high eutrophication, particularly due to a relatively low flushing rate. Because of this, Hunting Harbor (only) is classified as water quality limiting. A link-node stead-state model of the Untington-Northport Complex will be verified as part of the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. VII.4.s. Smithtown Bay Smithtown Bay is a relatively large open embayment located along the northern shore of Long Island. It is defined as that area lying southerly of a line extending easterly from Eatons Neck Point on the west to Crane Neck Point on the east and is entirely within Suffolk County. The depth of the Bay varies directly with the distance from shore. The maximum depth of 60 feet is reaches near its confluence with Long Island Sound. Mean tidal range in the Bay is 6.1 feet. The Nissequogue River is a fresh water stream and tidal estuary discharging into Smithtown Bay. It is one of the two principal tribu- taries to Smithtown Bay; the other being Stony Brook Harbor. A mean tidal range of 7.0 feet is experienced at the mouth of the Nissequogue River carrying tidal water as far upstream as five miles. The river is over 6� miles long and has a drainage area of approximately 27 square miles. The river is generally quite shallow with a narrow channel maintained near its mouth. VII-36 Most of the Bay is classified SA for the taking of shellfish a-ad is primarily used for shellfishing and recreation. The major portion of Smithtown Bay is open to the taking of shellfish. As a precautionary measure, it is necessary to close a substantial area (-2 mile radius) around the outfall line of the Kings Park State Hospital to the taking of shellfish. In addition, the waters of the Nissequogue area, due to cesspools, are of such condition,, that the harvesting of shellfish is also restricted. Most of the shoreline of Smithtown Bay is covered by either public parks or private country clubs, the largest of these being Sunken Meadow State Park. Most, if not all, of these park areas are equipped with sanitary waste disposal systems with subsurface disposal. The remaining shoreline area is scattered with private homes, ranging from small summer cottages to large estates. All of these homes use some form of subsurface device as a means of waste disposal. However, most of the homes are located a sufficient distance from the Bay so that this type of disposal has had little or no effect on the sanitary or bacteriological quality of the waters of the Bay. The largest source of pollutants to Smithtown Bay is the discharge from the sewage treatment plant serving Kings Park State Hospital. The hospital operates a secondary treatment plant of the activated sludge variety with its outfall located approximately one mile offshore, north of the mouth of the Nissequogue River. The plant serves an estimated 9500 people and experiences an average flow of 1.0 million gallons per day, which is half of its design capacity. The Nissequogue River is subject to potential contamination from the subsurface systems, particu- larly in the vicinity of the Jericho Turnpike, where a high water table exists. VII-37 The vastness of Smithtown Bay, together with its depth minimizes the effects of boating on the sanitary quality of the Bay water. Very few boats are moored in the open waters of the Bay, most finding shelter within Stony Brook Harbor. There is one small marina located near the south of the Nissequogue River, but again the effects of pleasure craft are negligible, due to vessel discharge restrictions and the extensive dilution provided by the 7.0 foot tidal range in the area. VII.4.t. Port Jefferson Harbor Port Jefferson Harbor is located on the north shoreof Suffolk County within the Town of Brookhaven, 14 miles southeast of Bridgeport, Connecticut. The Harbor is approximately 1000 acres. Located to the west are tributary shallow tidal basins of Conscience Bay and Setauket Harbor. A deep channel for the purpose of navigation, 300 feet wide by 26 feet deep, spans the length of the Harbor. The Harbor is of industrial, commercial and recreational significance with marinas, yacht clubs, docks, oil terminals, sand and gravel facili- ties, and a power plant located on the southern shoreline. Approximately 125 acres of the Harbor, located south of a line running between the Long Island Lighting Company bulkhead and the Beach House at the foot of Beach Road in Belle Terre, are classified SC. The remaining 875 acres of the main harbor, along with Conscience Bay and Setauket Harbor are classified SA. The circulation pattern throughout Port Jefferson Harbor is controlled by the tidal cycle. The shallow depths of Conscience Bay and Setauket Harbor result in a large percent of the volumes being exchanged with Port Jefferson Harbor water each tidal cycle. However, this does not define true flushing of these areas, as the only exchange with Long Island Sound waters is through the Port Jefferson Harbor mouth. This VII-38 limited flushing results in occasional localized problems observed in these two remote coves. The Port Jefferson Sewer District discharges approximately 1.8 MGD of primary treatment plant effluent to the waters of the Harbor. Addi- tional factors influencing water quality include storm runoff and commercial and recreational activities such as an oil terminal, ferry service and large marinas. The LILCO facility in Port Jefferson Harbor is a source of thermal loadings, but detailed studies of its effects on the Bay have not been perfo rmed. Approximately 80 percent (690 acres) of the SA classified waters are presently closed to shellfishing. Over the past several years, the general water quality in the Harbor and adjoining waters has been found to be improving, based on coliform levels found in the SA waters. Based on surface water data collected by the SCDEC, water quality continues to be generally satisfactory. The Harbor proper experiences good tidal flushing. Data from the 1974 Suffolk County Department of Health Services Report of Bathing Beach Water Quality rated beaches in the Harbor and adjoining waters as excellent. A proposal to increase the existing sewer discharge to somewhere in the range of 5 to 8 MGD is under consideration. It is not explicitly known what impact an increase discharge would have on the overall quality or biological quality in this area (eutrophication). Alternative collection, treatment and disposal plans are being considered. With expansion, it is likely that advanced waste treatment and/or out of Harbor discharges will be required and, therefore, Port Jefferson Harbor has been classified as water quality limiting. The Port Jefferson Harbor Complex will be studied as part of the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. The study shall include the development and VII-39 verification of a one dimensional link-node model for the entire complex. Development of this model will provide a basis for a better evaluation of treatment/location requirements for any increased discharge to this area. VII.4.u. Peconic Bay-Block Island Sound At the east end of Long Island, the Island is separated into two forks. Between these forks is located the complex of waters that contains, among others, Gardiners Bay, Peconic Bay and Little Peconic Bay. Block Island Sound is that body of water between the bays and the open waters of the ocean. Great Peconic Bay covers an area of 19,700 acres. Little Peconic Bay covers some 14,470 acres. The waters of the complex are relatively deep, with a mean depth of 22 feet for Great Peconic, while much of the central portion of Little Peconic is 30 to 50 feet or more. The land acres around the Bay generallyare not highly developed. A good deal of land around Great Peconic Bay is used for farmland or is wooded land. South Jamesport, a small community on the northern shore is the largest developed area along the shoreline. The population is around 500 people. Deep Hole Creek, a tributary, drains a small area on which are located several summer homes using subsurface sewage disposal systems. The underflow from these systems could cause water quality problems. Great Peconic Bay also has a large transient boat population that could cause problems due to illegal discharges from onboard toilet facilities and from marinas servicing these boats. The land surrounding Little Peconic Bay is similar in use to that of Great Peconic Bay, mainly farming and woodlands. The Town of New Suffolk (population 500) has a marina. This area has been closed to shellfishing. There are several small summer colonies that are served VII-40 by cesspools which pose a potential health and water quality hazard. The waters of the Peconic Bay Complex are classified SA, which assigns shellfishing as the best potential use. Wind and wave action in combination with tidal induced currents promote good circulation of the top and bottom waters of the Bay. There are no point source discharges of pollutants into any portion of the Great Peconic Bay Complex or its tributaries. The bacterial quality of these waters is excellent, therefore, the majority of the waters of the Great Peconic Bay Complex are open to the taking of shellfish. The overall quality of the waters of the Peconic Bay Complex is high. No immediate threats to the degradation of the water quality exist. Therefore, with continuous monitoring and organized planning, the high quality of the waters will be insured. The Peconic Eastuary-Peconic Bay system will be studied to some extent as partof the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. VII.4.v. Peconic River The Peconic River is the major tributary to the Peconic Bay-Flanders Bay Complex. It is a tidal estuary for about 2� miles from the Bay to a dam in the hamlet of Riverhead. Westward, the river winds through the hamlet and then through open farmlands and woodlands for about 11 miles. The headwaters of the river are located to a large extent, in the property controlled by the Brookhaven Laboratories. The Peconic River is one of the largest on Long Island and drains most of the central section of Suffolk County. Waste sources on the Peconic River include the Brookhaven National Laboratory, Gumman Aerospace, several duck farms and the hamlet of Riverhead. The lower section of the river has several impoundments and VII-41 profuse growths of rooted aquatics have been a chronic problem. Due to the complexities of the Peconic River caused by the series of impoundments and the existing stream eutrophication, it is now classified a water quality limiting segment. A water quality survey and mathematical model of this stream are scheduled as part of the Nassau-Suffolk 208 Areawide Wastewater Management Plan. VII.4.w. Sag Harbor Sag Harbor is one of many embayments of the Shelter Island Sound and has a surface area of approximately 575 acres. It is a relatively shallow body of water, having an average depth of five feet at mean low water and a maximum depth of up to 12 feet. This Harbor is classified SA for the taking of shellfish and primary and secondary contact recreation. Because of the relatively shallow nature of the Harbor, tidal varia- tions have a major effect on the pattern of circulation. The mean tidal range for Sag Harbor is 2.5 feet, although this increases to 3.0 feet during spring tides. Tidal waters enter the Sag Harbor-Sag Harbor Cove Complex at the northeastern extremity and flow southwesterly past the breakwater under the North Haven Bridge. A portion of these waters enter the Big Narrows and the Little Narrows. This tidal action affects the circulation pattern of the area in a general in and out pattern. At present, coliform levels have caused the closure of approximately 30 percent of these shellfish grounds. The major sources of contamina- tion are Sag Harbor (V), which discharges raw wastewater through storm sewers behind the breakwater and the groundwater seepage from subsurface disposal systems. Portions of Sag Harbor (V) are being sewered and a treatment system is being constructed. The exact point of discharge has been disputed because of impact on the shellfish grounds. Presently, VII-42 the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation favors extended aeration treatment with discharge behind the breakwater of Sag Harbor to minimize impact on open shellfish grounds. Other sources of contamination are the Bullova Watch Company, which presently partially treats its wastes by settlingand the heavy concentration of pleasure craft moored throughout the area. Sag Harbor is now classified as water quality limiting. VIi.4.x. Mecox Bay Mecox Bay is a south shore bay in Suffolk County. It is located in the Town of Southampton. The Bay is shallow with an average depth of two feet. Surface area of the Bay is approximately 1045 acres. The Bay is separated from the ocean by a barrier beach that restricts flow. Normally the Bay does not have an inlet that is open to the sea. The Town maintains an inlet that is opened as it is needed to maintain salinity levels. Despite the limited tidal flushing, wind and fresh water induced currents produce relatively complete mixing. The Bay is classified SA with Hayground Cove classified SA and SB. Some tributary areas are classified SC. Some surrounding land is used for agricultural purposes, for truck farming and duck farming. The Bay is a valuable waterfowl area and is valuable as a recreational area for boating and sailing. The Bay is held to be an economic asset with respect to the propagation of oysters and blue claw crabs. The soils surrounding the Bay have limited perme- ability and, therefore, surface water runoff is relatively high. Mecox Bay Duck Farm (70,000 ducks) is located at the head of Hayground Cove and has, in the past, been a major source of coliforms and nutrients. This farm did not operate in 1975. The farm's owner is attempting to sell the property, but plans to operate in 1976. The VII-43 size and type Of operation will depend on availability of ducklings. There are no other major point sources of wastewater. The area around the Bay is lightly populated so that septic tank contributions should not pose a problem. The boats that use the Bay are small and do not significantly contribute to pollutional loading. The waters of the Bay are generally pollution-free to a degree to which shellfish can be taken. Hayground Cove and Calf Creek are closed to the taking of shellfish with the remainder of the shellfish areas open. V1I.4.y. Moriches Bay Moriches Bay is a south shore bay located in Suffolk County, Long Island. The Bay is about 10 miles long and has a surface area of 15 square miles. The Bay is relatively shallow with an average depth of four feet with some dredged channels being deeper. The land surrounding the Bay has a rural character. There are several duck farms located around the Bay. There are also a growing number of private homes. The shore of the Bay is used by many boat clubs for their headquarters. The Bay proper is classified SA with tributaries classified SB and SC. The Bay is used for boating, commercial and sport fishing, as well as shellfishing. it is also a valuable waterfowl area. Uses that have been impacted by degraded water quality are shellfishing and swimming. The Bay was once productive for oysters, but these have declined to the point where they are hard to find and unsuitable to use. Moriches Bay receives waste inputs from duck farm activities along with groundwater inputs of nitrogen compounds from septic tank and cess- pool leaching. Duck wastes are usually high in organics, nutrients and coliform and are difficult t~o properly treat without stabilization of VII -44 raw wastewater flow and diligent maintenance effort. As more housing is added to the area, septic tank leaching will become a more significant source of nutrients and coliforms. The industrial wastes are from poultry processing and contribute over 60 percent of the yearly nitrogen inputs. Past activities at duck farms have caused sludge deposits throughout various protions of the embayment. The nitrogen contributed by these duck farms and other non-poing sources cause excessive growths of algae and aquatic plants which make portions of the Bay unfit for recreation. In addition, these conditions have caused a decline in the oyster popu- lation. The algae cause increased turbidity and clog the gills of clams. The turbidity blocks sunlight that is needed by bottom life for growth. High coliform levels have resulted in closing of many shellfish areas. Enforcement efforts during 1974-1975 have resulted in a decrease in effluent coliform violations and incaeased chlorination reliability at the duck farms. An important factor in this area is the limited circulation patterns and flushing of the Bay. Studies of the Bay's hydrography indicated that low flushing rates of Moriches Bay and eastern Great South Bay were responsible for holding the pollutants long enough to cause massive proliferation of minute algae which are deleterious to oysters. Dredging of Moriches Inlet served to increase the flushing rates and consequently reduce these pollutional effects until sufficient silting of the inlet served to again lower the flushing rate. Conclusions from these past studies were that low salinity and low flushing rates augment the ill effects caused by the organic nitrogen loadings from duck wastes, septic tank and cesspool leaching and other non-point sources. Problems are such in this embayment that it is now considered water quality limiting. VII-45 VII.4.z. Shinnecock Bay Shinnecock Bay is located on the south shore of Eastern Long Island in the Town of Southampton. The Bay and tributaries have a surface area of about 8300 acres. The average depth is about five feet with a mean total range of about 2.9 feet. It is connected by the Shinnecock Canal to the Great Peconic Bay to the north and to the Quantuck Bay on the west via the Quogue Canal. The majority of the Bay's waters have been classified SA, with some tributary areas classified SB and SC. The Bay has an inlet from the ocean that provides a good exchange with the sea waters that are of high quality. Freshwater inflow entering from the tributaries is also of high qaulity. The land around the Bay is sparsely populated with some development taking place particularly in Pine Neck and around Tiana Bay. All of the houses have cesspools and the depths of soil cover may be inadequate in some areas. The major uses of the Bay are for recreational purposes and for shellfishing beds. Generally, the waters of the Bay are of high quality. Pollution from boats is not felt to be significant. The only areas closed for shellfishing are for purposes of relaying beds. Sanitary surveys of the Bay indicate the bacterial pollution does not seem to be significant and has not been increasing to any noticeable extent. The development in the area of Pine Neck could cause some problems and will need additional monitoring. Development in the Tiana Bay area may also become a threat to the water quality of the Bay. Sewers may be needed to minimize any potential problems arising from this area, depending on the ultimate density of development.. VII.4.aa. Great South Bay Great South Bay is located on the south shore of Long Island near VII-46 the Towns of Babylon, Islip and Brookhaven. The boundaries of the Bay as defined herein are the Nassau-Suffolk Line on the west ard Smith's Point on the east. The Great South Bay, as described herein, is a part of the Great South Bay Complex which extends from the East Rockaway Inlet in the west to Smith's Point in the east. The western region of the Complex includes Hempstead Bay, East Bay, Middle Bay and South Oyster Bay, and is characterized by many channels, islands and tidal flats which are not common to the eastern portion of the Bay Complex. The Bays contained in the western portion of the Complex are addressed individually under appropriate sections. Great South Bay proper is approximately 30 miles in length. The average depth of the Bay is six feet with only main navigational channels and dredged areas exceeding depths of ten feet. Twenty percent of the Bay has a depth of less than three feet. This shallow depth allows the bottom of the Bay to be well illuminated, hence promoting the growth of benthic plants. The shallow waters of Great South Bay support a standing crop of eelgrass (ZOSTERA MARINA) and algae. Great South Bay is presently the most important hard clam (MERCENARIA MERCENARIA) producing area of the world. Approximately 50 percent of the hard clams produced in the United States are produced in tbe waters of Long Island, of which greater than 80 percent of the above come from Great South Bay. The shoreline area is presently under intense develop- ment by recreational and commercial interests. The waters of the Great South Bay are classified as SA, the highest classification for marine waters which assigns shellfishing as the best potential use. VII-47 Great South Bay is a shallow embayment with limited tidal flushing. Hence, wind is the primary mover and inducer of currents and mixing. Dissolved oxygen concentrations within the Bay have been monitored and available data indicates that concentrations are consistently near or in excess of 100 percent saturation. One would anticipate this in a shallow, wind driven system such as Great South Bay. The overall bacterial quality of the waters of Great South Bay is very good. The primary sources of coliform. organisms are attributed to runoff, with the exception of inputs from several small treatment plants. The only areas seriously impacted are those contiguous to the north shore of the Bay. This may be attributed to the increased development of the north shore which has resulted in an input of nutrients to the waters. Circulation patterns tend to concentrate these nutrients along the north shore, hence, posing a potential water quality prblems. Duck farming was once a major source of pollutants to Great South Bay. Untreated a-ad inadequately treated wastewater contributed substan- tial quantities of solids, BOD, coliforms and nutrients to the eastern portion of Great South Bay. There are now only two major duck farms tributary to Great South Bay and both provide biological wastewater treatment and disinfection. Nitrogen in the form of nitrates enter the Bay from streams which drain the south shore communities. Groundwater underf low quantity and quality is significant, but can only be estimated at this time. The addition of nutrients, specifically nitrogen, in combination with low tidal flushing rates, allows for the accumulation of nutrients within the Bay system. Since the concentrations of these nutrient materials are in excess of the amounts required to support nearshore plankton growth, the streams are potential sources of eutrophication. VII-48 Since nitrogen is the critical factor to algal growth and eutrophication in marine waters, continued enrichment of the Bay can be controlled only by limiting the addition of nitrogen and nitrogen-bearing compounds and maintenance of the limited inlets. Although eelgrass has been a recurring phenomena, the present degree of eutrophication of Great South Bay is not overly critical and the Bay presently provides one of the best environments in the nation for shellfish. However, as this is not a permanent condition, nutrient and algal concentrations must be monitored closely in the futue to insure maintenance of a healthy marine resource The open eastern section of Great South Bay Complex is also covered in the modeling studies of the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. Of great concern in this area is the bacteriological water quality along the -north shoreline, which can be addressed by the proposed link-node hydro- dynamic water quality model (time variable) proposed for Great South Bay. Steady-state conditions will also be assessed by modeling efforts of the Bay Complex and will help better understand and manage the nutrient inputs into the complex. Due to the great value of this resource and the potential for serious future eutrophication problems (due to shallow nature), should large wastewater loadings be proposed in the future, Great South Bay is now classified water quality limiting. VII.4.ab. South Oyster Bay South Oyster Bay is that body of water on the south shore of Long Island between the Wantagh State Parkway and the Nassau-Suffolk Line. The Bay has a surface area of 12 square miles. The water of the Bay is relatively shallow and is generally less than five feet in depth, with numerous drains and channels winding their way in and among the many small islands. VII-49 The land adjacent to the Bay on the north is relatively heavily populated. However, heavy industrial complexes are not concentrated near the shore areas or along tributaries to the Bay. South Oyster Bay was once a major producer of hard clams and some soft clams. Excessive growths of eelgrass and algae have reduced the production to the point where few commercial harvesters are presently using the Bay. The Bay is classified SA with some tributaries classi- fied SB and SC. Protions of the Bay are still open to the taking of shellfish. A portion of the Bay was closed due to the break in the Cedar Greek STP outfall. Areas along the mainland shore were closed to the taking of shellfish due to possible bacterial contamination from housing developments. These developments were previously not sewered and used cesspools for sewage disposal. Presently, Nassau County SD #3 encompasses the area tributary to this Bay. The treatment plant is operational and 25 percent of the district hookups have been made, including all of the southern shoreline areas which were shown to be contributing to Bay contamination. Further, the developments have also required the installa- tion of stormwater drains. This stormwater drainage is directed towards the tributaries of the Bay. Thus, non-point sources of pollution, while not quantified, appear to be significant. The major usage of the Bay is for water oriented recreation, particu- larly for boating. This has led to demand for more and better boat channels. This leads to dredging which alters the bottom conditions and can radically change the circulation patterns in the Bay. All in all, the waters of the Bay are of generally good quality. The development of the shores and use of the Bay for recreation requires that surveillance be carried on to insure the water quality does not VIT- 50 deteriorate. While the Bay is enriched by nutrients, it is ecologically well balanced. However, control of nutrient inputs are needed to allev- iate algae problems which would ultimately improve the shellfish resource. This Bay will be part of the study area of the Great South Bay Complex to be studied in great detail under the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. As part of the study, one dimensional., link-note (steady state and time variable) models will be developed and verified for the entire Great South Bay Complex. These models will be used to assess the impact on water quality of the various abatement alternatives to be addressed under the 208 study. VII.4.ac. East Bay East Bay is a south shore bay located between Wantagh State Parkway and Me-adowbrook State Parkway in the town of Hiempstead, Nassau County, New York. The Bay as described herein is bounded on the east by South Oyster Bay, on the west by Middle Bay and includes Merrick Bay. The Bay has a surface area of approximately six square miles which is utilized for recreation and is a good shellfish habitat. The Waters if East Bay, as common to all four south shore bays, contain large areas of shallow depths (2�, to 3 feet), with only main navigational channels and other dredged areas exceeding depths of 10 feet. The Bay is defined as a "barrier built" -estuary. Due to its shallow depth and limited tidal flushing, wind is the prime mover and inducer of currents and mixing. The major portion of the Bay has been classified as SA., the highest classification for a given area, which assigns shellfishing as the best potential use. Some northern areas of the Bay have been classified I. Is I~~~n March 1972, closure of approximately the upper half of the Bay to shellfish harvesting was instituted as a result of a large portion VII-51 of these waters not being able to consistently comply with the stringent water quality requirements necessary to permit shellfish harvesting. The remainder of the shellfish growing areas were closed in April 1974. The Bay contains sufficient concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus which act a nutrients for the support of an active plankton population. The concentrations of these elements are significantly lower than those experienced in Hempstead and Middle Bays, hence the problem of algal blooms has not been overly critical in this Bay. The overall higher quality of the waters within East Bay as compared to the waters of Hempstead and Middle Bays is attributed primarily to the smaller quantity of pollutants introduced to East Bay. The major point source discharges to East Bay are from the Jones Beach Wastewater Treatment facility and the Merrick Municipal Incinerator Complex. The ,incinerator uses cooling water and process water. Extremely high coliform counts in the process waters are due to the transfere of organisms during refuse processing and for a proliferation of the bacteria during the incineration process. Recycling of process water or discharge of process water only after chlorination and other treatment are options which will avoid contrivention of standards. Associated with the Merrick Incinerator are 50 acres of land set aside for use as landfill. Leachate from this landfill, high in ammonia, organic nitrogen, and BOD, also imposes a pollutional load on the Bay. VIT-52 The incinerator has significant thermal discharges. However, no ill effects such as fish kills or destruction of aquatic life indigenous to the waters of the Bay has been detected. The overall water quality of the East Bay is good. The bacteriological quality is good, as indicated by median TAPN at nine sample points in 1972, being less than 70/100 ml. However, bacterial concentrations experienced in the northern areas of the Bay may exceed average Bay concentrations. This may be attributed to the following: a) many areas along the shoreline and areas tributary to the Bay are presently served by individual sewage disposal systems such as cesspools; b) failure of individual systems contaminates groundwater which introduces pollutants, specifically nitrates, to the Bay as non-point sources; c) stormwater drainage is directed towards the tributaries of the Bay; d) stream and subsurface discharges and discharges from incinerator process waters and landfill 0 ~~leachate and runoff at the Merrick Incinerator; e) intrusion of polluted waters from the northern areas of Middle Bay in Freeport to East Bay; and f) tidal interchange in the northern areas of the Bay tend to concentrate pollutants which enter the area. The Nassau County SD #3 encompasses much of the shoreline areas tributary to the Bay. This plant is operational and approximately 25 percent of the hookups have been made. This should result in significant reduction in future pollution loadings from individual systems. Existing dissolved oxygen data indicates that the average dissolved oxygen concentrations at various sample points throughout the Bay are in compliance with the standard. This Bay will be part of the study area of the Great South Bay Complex, to be studied in great detail under the Nassau-Suffolk 208 study. 'As part of the study, one dimensional link-node (steady state VII-53 and time variable) models will be developed and verified by the entire Great South Bay Complex. These models will be used to assess the impact on water quality of the various abatement alternatives to be assessed under the 208 study. VII.4.ad. Middle Bay Middle Bay is located on the south shore of Long Island in the town of Hempstead. The Bay as defined herein includes Bay of Fundy and Baldwin Bay and all contiguous waters bounded by Meadowbrook State Parkway on the east, Lido Beach and city of Long Beach on the south, Long Island on the north and the Long Beach Boulevard on the west. The Bay has a surface area of approximately nine square miles, most of which is classified SA -- best usage -- taking of shellfish. Middle Bay, like all south shore bays is an important recreational area. The Bay is also a prime shellfish habitat and supports a good sport fishery. Intensive sampling has been performed on Middle Bay by several agencies. In 1966, a biological study was conducted for Nassau County DPW. Bacteriological results of the survey indicated the possibility that some areas within the Bay may not be suitable for the harvesting of shellfish. Follow up surveys of the Bay indicated that many areas of Middle Bay could not meet the rigid bacteriological standards required for shellfishing. In 1972, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation closed all of Middle Bay to the taking of shellfish. Major wastewater discharges to Middle Bay are the Freeport (V) STP and Freeport Incinerator, which discharge to Stadium Park Canal, the Oceanside Incinerator, and the E. F. Barrett Lilco Power Station located on Barnums Channel. Other sources of contaminants are stormwater runoff i and carry-over from Reynolds Channel and Hempstead Bay. VTI-54 As expected, the highest bacterial levels have been found in the Freeport area and Oceanside area. Similarly, violations of the dissolved oxygen standard have been recorded in the vicinity of Freeport and in Reynolds Channel, just east of Long Beach Road, This latter area is also being impacted by carry-over from Hempstead Bay. The concentration of nutrients within Middle Bay are essentially the same as within Hempstead Bay, with the highest levels of nitrogen and phosphorus observed in the vicinity of Freeport. As phosphorus is usually present in sufficient quantities in the marine waters of Long Island to support phytoplankton growth, nitrogen is generally considered the limiting nutrient. It is felt that Middle Bay is experiencing excessive nutrient levels, which, under proper wind and tidal conditions, with sunlight, could trigger nuisance algae blooms. Preliminary mass balances of nitrogen compounds indicate 93 percent of the nitrogen loading to the Bay from the municipal sewage treatment at Freeport. Thus, direct control of this source may have a substantial effect on nutrient levels with the Bay. This has generally been the position of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in this area. It is primarily for this reason that Middle Bay is now classified as water quality limiting. The Nassau-Suffolk 208 study will provide for detailed studies of the south shore embayments within Nassau County. Benefits of abatement alternatives involving advanced treatment, discharge and/or ocean disposal along with stormiwater runoff control will be evaluated by complex water quality and groundwater mathematical models. VII.4.ae. Hempstead Bay (West Bay) Hempstead Bay is a south shore bay in Long Island, New York. The Bay has a surface area of some five square miles and is the westernmost VII-55 portion of the Hempstead-South Oyster Bay estuary. Hempstead Bay can be classified as a "bar-built" estuary. Inlets connecting a bar-built estuary with the ocean are relatively small compared to the dimensions of the Sound within the barrier. This reduces tidal influence and makes wind the primary moving force for mixing. This is due to the shallow depth and the barrier island influence. The mean depth of the Bay is four feet, with deeper depths occurring in the main navigational channels. The majority of the Bay has been classified SA, with some tributary areas classified SB and SC. The Bay is used predominantly for recreation and is also considered to be valuable waterfowl, shellfish and finfish habitat. Hempstead Bay is beginning to show signs of excessive nutrient enrichment. There are more prolific blooms of blue-green algae in this Bay than in adjacent south shore bays, indicating a pcssible shift toward less desirable phytoplankton organisms in the Bay. This is attributed to the heavy point source loading of nitrogenous compounds from the major STPs. There has also been a gradual deterioration in a bacteri- ological quality throughout the Bay. This has resulted in the closure of all shellfish areas throughout the Bay. There is also some concern for the county bathing beaches as bacterial quality has also apparently been deteriorating at these beaches since 1968. Sewage treatment plant effluents and stormwater runoff are both major sources of pollution. Stormwater runoff and possibly any bypassing by the STPs seem to be significant factors since after rainfalls, the bacterial quality of the Bay is more degraded. The sewage treatment plants discharging to the Bay include Bay Park STP, Long Beach STP, West Long Beach STP and Lawrence STP. According to preliminary mass balances of nutrients, these treatment plants are VII-56 responsible f or over 95 percent of the total yearly nitro-en load. These plants are also deemed to be responsible for the organic loadings which, coupled with the secondary algal effects, cause occasional contravention of the 5.0 ppm DO standard sor SA waters. Due tothe existing problems in this embayment, it is now classified water quality limiting. Hempstead Bay will be extensively studied under the Nassau-Suffolk 208 Planning Study. A hydrodynamic link-node model of the Bay will be utilized with comprehensive groundwater models to evaluate various alternative means of wastewater disposal in this area. The alternative systems include advanced waste treatment (nitrogen removal), with Bay discharge, secondary treatment with ocean outfalls and/or recharge. VII.4.af. Jamaica Bay Jamaica Bay is located on the south shoreof Long Island, almost totally within the bounds of the boroughs of New York City. The Bay is bounded on the north by Queens, the south by Rockaway Peninsula, the east by Nassau County and JFK Airport, and on the west by Brooklyn. The Bay is approximately six miles long and four miles wide, with a surface area of approximately 20 square miles. Similar to other south shore bay systems, Jamaica Bay is a geographically enclosed area of the ocean. It has a mean depth of only 16 feet, supports an extensive system of tidal marshes and has a limited tidal exchange of waters. The only connection to the ocean is through Rockaway Inlet, located at the southwest corner of the Bay. The absence of major rivers or streams discharging to the Bay limits the fresh water input to the Bay. The major fresh water inputs result from discharges from water pollution control facilities, combined sewer overflows and storm drainage systems. Circulation within the Bay waters is limited by an extremely small net tidal exchange. VIT-57 Land areas contiguous to the Bay are heavily urbanized. This leads to a considerable diversity in the uses made of the Bay. Presently, fishing, boating, wildlife management, solid and liquid waste disposal, land reclamation, residence, airport facilities and shipping are the dominant uses of the Jamaica Bay resources. The major portion of the waters of the Bay are calssified SB, which assigns bathing and any other usages, except shellfishing for market purposes, as the best usage for the waters. Other waters of the Bay area are classified I, C, D and SC. The contributions to the past and continuing degradation of the waters of Jamaica Bay are manifold. Extensive impact on the water quality parameters of the Bay is attributed to t he discharge of waste- water from the Coney Island, Rockaway, 26th Ward, Jamaica, the Spring Creek Auxiliary Plant water pollution control facilities and combined sewer overflows. Other contributing factors to this problem are urban surface runoff, drainage from Kennedy Airport, and raw discharges from the Broad Channel and Hawtree Basin areas. This has led to the restric- tion, and in many cases, the elimination of the uses of the waters for activities such as swimming, fish propagation and basic esthetic enjoyment. Combined sewer overflows are responsible for approximately 25 percent of the BOD, 42 percent of the suspended solids and 27 percent of the total coliform. discharged to Jamaica Bay on an annual basis. A major portion of the combined sewers discharge to small basins or ,creeks within the Bay. This condition has led to the contravention of water quality standards in these locations with respect to dissolved oxygen and coliform levels. Periods of significant rainfall result in increased coliform, levels throughout the entire North Channel, hence, VI-1-58 making evident the significance of combined sewer overflows. The present water quality of Jamaica Bay is consistently in non- compliance with the coliform standards set forth by the New York City Health Department. Existing coliform levels in the waters contiguous to major beach areas fail to meet the standard and, hence, restrict the recreational activities within the environment of the Bay. Dissolved oxygen problems within the Bay are minor and contravention of standards occurs infrequently. The use of the waters of the Bay is further restricted by the high algal population. The algal blooms result in excessively turbid waters, which hampers bathing uses and also reduces sunlight penetration to the Bay floor. This reduction in penetration results in a deficient benthic grass population, which is needed for the feeding of fish. The problem of extensive algal population is attributed to biostimulants discharged 0 ~~by sanitary sewage effluents. The algal concentration increases towards the head of the Bay, indicating that they are being produced in the Bay. Sediments have been realized as a factor contributing to the water quality degradation of the Bay. High levels of coliforms, organics and nutrients characterize these deposits. In certain segments of the Bay, the oxygen demand of these sediments appears to be a dominant factor on water quality. A significant percentage of the materials appearing in sediments has been attributed to combined sewer overflows. The City has realized the problems of the Bay. in an effort to alleviate these problems, a program of construction of treatment facili- ties to eliminate the problem of combined sewer overflow is in effect. It is the desire of the City to achieve the understanding of the problems Is inherent to the Bay so that improvement to the receiving waters may be planned. A two dimensional hydrodynamic time variable model of Jamaica Bay has been developed and verified by Rand Corporation for NYC EPA. VII-59 This model can be used to evaluate various abatement alternatives being considered for Jamaica Bay, particularly in regard to coliform contamination. VII-60 VIII. GROUNDWATER The purpose of this section of the Long' Island 303(e) Report is to generalize some of the aspects of the groundwater system of Long Island. In- cluded in this section are summaries of the groundwater hydrology, supply, quality, management problems, alternatives and policies. The information for this Chapter has been obtained from various publications pertaining to the groundwater of Long Island and are listed in the bibliography. Because of the critical reliance on groundwater by most of the Island, general information on groundwater hydrology has been developed for over 40 years by such agencies as the United States Geological Survey, the former New York State Water Resources Commission, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, New York State Health Department and various local agencies. Other reports pertaining .to the more specific problems of groundwater availability and pollution problems have also been published'. Some of these specific reports are also listed in the bibliography. The most recent studies on groundwater have been aimed at developing management techniques so the quantity and quality of groundwater on Long Island are maintained or improved. Fundamental to understanding the water resources of any area is the hydro- logic cycle. A representation of the cycle is shown on Figure 30. The portion of the hydrologic cycle paramount to' the groundwater system is noted as solid lines. The cycle represented by Figure 30 is the natural cycle and does not reflect the i'nfluence of man. A modified hydrologic cycle is presented later in the paper to illustrate this effect. ,A water budget analysis has been made for about 760 square miles of Long Island as indicated by Figure 31. Excluded from the budget areas are the .extreme eastern section commonly known as The Forks and the heavily urbanized areas of Kings and Queens. The water budget analysis is based on a continuous VIII-l ATMOSPHERE PRECIPI FATION EVAPOTRANSPIRATION V/ I EVAPOTRANSPIRATION - - I v J~ b~ ~~ .EVAPORATION SURFACE-WATER 0 ~, ~ ! EVAPORATION |OILY I., OUIFLOW\ LAND SURFACE IDIREECT: DO.S OF SURFACE WATER' INFILTRATION INFILTRATION ZONE OF E AERATION " - ' -- l~ l ~EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ",~~~~ / ~SEEPAGE A CAPILLARY RISE OWNWARD SPRING SEEPAGE I SUBSURFACE N ,\ J\ 8 GROUND.WATER I OUT FLOW \ ZONE OF SATURATION IO EXPLANATION Heavy lines represent malor flow paths; thin hlines, minor flow paths; solid lines, flow of liquid water; dashed hlines, flow of gaseous water Figure 30 Natural Hydrologic Cycle VIII-2 VIII-2 = '. NEW - ~~~CONNFCTICUTr NWYORK - NEW S15 ~~~~~~~~Northern part of p rlar.h JILJ(;.rt. r.oi,' Nr~~ ~~~~~ Srtt..rIt..r ,t %r It-VI K wa~~~~~~~~~~tr -budget atea S j Souttlorn pM! ni Lih'r nearshore area A ANT 1 0 315 23 25 MILES Figure 31 WATER BUDGET AREA (Reference 1.) record'of streamflow, climatological and groundwater data for 26 years, 1940- 1965. A summary of the overall water budget versus the groundwater budget is presented as Table 29 below. Table 29 WATER BUDGET (Reference 2) * ~~~Overall Water Budget (mgd) Groundwater Budget (mgd) Inflow-Precipitation 1600 Inflow-GW Recharge 820 Outflow-Evapotranspiration 760 O~utflow-GW Discharge to 320 streams Subsurface outflow 470 Subsurface outflow 470 Streamflow discharge 340 Evapotranspiration 15 of groundwater Evapotranspiration 15 of groundwater Spring flow 15 Spring flow 15 ___ 1600 mgd 820 mgd VIII-3 VIII.1. Physiography The present day landscape of Long Island was produced by glacial action approximately 11,000 years ago and subsequent erosion. Within Long Island, different physiographic areas can be noted, the most apparent of these are the east-west trending topographic highs known as moraines. The longest, the Harbor Hill Moraine, extends from Kings County the entire length of-the Island and forms the North Fork. The Ronkonkoma Moraine eminates from the Harbor Hill Moraine a short distance from the Queens County eastern boundary, extends the length of the Island and forms the South Fork. Sloping gently southward from the moraines is the moderately level surface of the outwash plain. Recent deposits along the south shore have formed the barrier beaches such as Long Beach and Fire Island. By contrast, the northern shore is typified by steep erosional bluffs and deep embayments. VIII.2. Geology Several authors have prepared reports that describe the hydrogeology of Long Island with various degrees of detail. One of the more detailed reports covering the Island is one done by Suter, de Laguna and Perlmutter, Mapping of Geologic Formations and Aquifers on Long Island, 1949 GW-18 (Reference 3). Numerous other reports have been written concerning specific areas of Long Island.- In general, Long Island is composed of a wedge of unconsolidated materials resting on crystalline bedrock. A portion of the bedrock is exposed in northwest Queens and consists of pre-Cambrian schists and gneisses with local (northwest) occurrences of granodorite and "limestone" (probably the Inwood marble). The bedrock slops at about 65-80 feet per mile to the south- east to a depth of approximately 2,200' in south-central Suffolk County. The water bearing properties of the bedrock makes it unimportant as an aquifer, although a few wells in western Long Island obtain water from wells finished in the rock. VIII-4 Above the bedrock lies unconsolidated material of Cretaceous age. The basal unit of cretaceous age is the Lloyd-sand member of the Raritan Formation that forms the Lloyd aquifer. The aquifer has-a maximum thickness of.500 feet lies 200 feet to 1800 feet below land surface. The material consists of fine to coarse sand and gravel that locally has clayey matrix. Specific capacities, gallons per minute per feet of drawdown range from 1 gpm/ft to 25 gpm/ft and occasionally 50 gpm/ft. Locally, the aquifer has been invaded by salt water. The Lloyd aquifer is overlain by the Raritan clay which confines the Lloyd and creates an artesian condition. The maximum thickn~ss of the Raritan is approximatel 300 feet and lies 70-1500 feet below land surface. Stringers or lenses of sand produce some water but, in general, the importance of the Raritan clay is its confining nature rather than its water yielding capacity. Above the Raritan, clay is the Magothy formation of late Cretaceous age. This unit is approximately 1000 feet thick and lies from 0 to 600 feet below the surface. Materials are primarily sands and gravels with clay found as lenses. Specific capacities range from 1-30 gpm/ft and occasionally 80 gpm/ft. Water in the upper portion of the aquifer is unconfined while lower sections are most often confined. This aquifer. is a principal source of public water supply for Nassau and Suffolk, and to a lesser extent in Queens County. In some locations, the Magothy has been contaminated by salt water due to overpumping. The Mannetto gravel rests on the Magothy formation and has a maximum thickness of 300 feet. The Mannetto is found from 0 to 120 feet below the surface but is of limited areal extent being present only near the Suffolk-Nassau County border in the center of the Island. Most often, this unit is associated or confused with the upper glacial aquifer. The aquifer itself is highly per- meable but is usually above the water table. The high permeability, however, gives the Mannetto good infiltration characteristics making it important as a recharge unit where it is found above the water table. VIII-5 The Jameco gravel is the next unit up and the 300-foot thick.at maximum unit is foul from 50-500 feet below the surface. The Jameco occurs in Kings, Queens and southern Nassau counties as sand and gravel with few lenses of clay. The materials make the unit moderately to highly permeable with specific capacities ranging from 20 to 50 gpm/ft of drawdown. In some locations, brackish water and high iron content have affected the water quality. The Jameco is overlain by another Pleistocene age material with a maximum thickness of 300 feet. This unit, the Gardiners clay, is found 50-400 feet below the surface and is of poor permeability making only minor quantities of. water available where small, local sand lenses are tapped. The most widely used aquifer on Long Island is the Upper Pleistocene materials. The depth of this "unit" is from 0' to 50' below surface and has a maximum thickness of approximately 600 feet. -The aquifer is actually a mixture of different material ranging from till and clay, both poorly permeable, to coarse sand and gravel of high permeability. Specific capacities of these materials varies from about 10 gpm/ft to 200 gpm/ft of drawdown. Good infil- tration characteristics are also important characteristics of the aquifer. The water quality of this unit is good except for areas near the shoreline where salt water has invaded the "unit" and where land development has degraded the water. Quality will be further discussed in a later section. (References for this Section include number 1 through 5.) VIII.3. Groundwater Development As mentioned in various reports, the development of groundwater supplies has followed the evolution of Long Island from the first settlers to the present day urbanization and industrialization of one of the major population centers of the country. The first inhabitants of Long Island required small water supplies. Shallow dug wells and spring sources provided ample domestic water supplies. Waste VIII-6 UPPER7.. 101. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~RAC EIJ~ H~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Poie Lot 40 40N og-0-2' H .j I~~~~NASA I j~~~~~oJ IUEN I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 BROOKLYN K ~~~ N ~~FIGURE 32 ~APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION PROFILES I ,.+ AnO= AnI I. ^t 7n-Or I u/. water was returned to the ground through individual disposal systems. The impact of these systems on the groundwater regime was negligible and although contaminants were released to the groundwater, contamination, however, was minimal because of low population density and abundant water for dilution. Phase II of the evolution came about as the population increased with the subsequent increase in waste disposal. Contamination of the shallow ground- water sources used in early development necessitated the development of deeper supplies. Since the cost of obtaining deeper supplies was much greater, public water systems were developed to distribute costs amon g users. Individual waste disposal systems, however, were continued and pollution of the shallow gro und- water also continued. As population grew, water demand increased and withdrawals from the deeper aquifer systems became larger. Because of increased consumptive use and development of larger supplies, recharge to the deeper aquifers could not keep pace with use resulting in landward movement of the freshwater-saltwater interface and contamination of some wells. The third phase of development is characterized by the installation of sewers, waste water treatment and direct discharge to offshore waters and bays. The direct loss of water to the sea and increased withdrawals from the groundwater system causing accelerated landward migration of the fresh-salt water interface. Since sewering took place near the major population centers, their effect was drastically felt at the western end of the Island it Kings and Queens Counties. The events in Kings County serve as a prime example of the effect of surface water outfalls and decreased recharge. In 1936, several years after sewer installation, pumpage was at 75 mgd with discharge of waste directly to the sea. Although other factors were involved, this caused the groundwater levels in Brooklyn to decline as much as 35 feet below sea level allowing contamination of the groundwater by salt water intrusion. In 1947, Kings County joined the New York City water supply system and, except for pumping for air conditioning (a relatively non-consumptive use), nearly all groundwater withdrawal ceased. VITI-8 A new report (1976) by Garber and Sulam (61) of the USGS presents the results of an analysis to assess the decline in water level in sewered areas of Nassau County. The area is about 71 square miles in size and is known as Sewer District 2. In the study, it was determined that the lowering of the water table ranged from 5.1-21 feet due to sewering. Also affected, and mentioned in the report, are the surface streams in the area. Loss of flow in one particular stream amounted to 2.5 cfs. As part of the 208 study for Long Island, the affects of sewering on the groundwater have been projected to 1995 (62). This report presents water level (head) changes for various aquifers under proposed sewering plans for Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long Island. The change in stream flow has also been determined using the electric-analog model. At present, all phases of the evolution are found on Long Island. The eastern most areas typify Phase I and "evolve" to Phase III in the western areas. VIII.4. Groundwater Use The majority of groundwater use is presently in the counties of Nassau and Suffolk with lesser withdrawals in lCings and Queens. The pumpage for Kings, Queens and Richmond Counties from 1905 to 1950 is illustrated in Figure 33 and a breakdown for Queens by aquifer and use for 1950, 66 and 73 is shown in Table 30. As mentioned above, present withdrawals are limited. This is due to the contamination problem and the increased water demand that brought about the importation of water from upstate sources. A comparison of groundwater levels for Kings and Queens is shown on Figure 35 which represents conditions without pumping and conditions in 1937, 1961, and 1974. Nassau County presently relies solely on groundwater for supply with need net by approximately 46 municipal systems, water districts and companies. VIII-9 70 Note:-.No jround-water pumpage fo public supply in ronx or New York Coun- ies,1905-l9152. 60 "Water Sho rtageIs 50 Catskill system in full operatio/\ of n9L9 11 (1917) 40 c~~~~~~~~~~ o I-.1 Il QUEENS CA o ,,3FN.AI I ci 30 ~20 A.. 'KINGS C). New YIrk Water Ser vice (Flatbush Plant) abao doned June 1947 CHMOND C: i. 0 R 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 3950 Figure -Comparison of average daily withdrawal of ground water for public supply, by Counties. 1905-52. FIGURE 33- (Reference 7) EPA 014 miio -r sex.- - FIGURE 34 NASSAU COUNTY PONDS 40 120 JMC 401 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CRE TACEOUS ~ 01InloL GRAPHS SHOWING AVERAGE DAILY WITNORAINAL OF WAVER FOR PUOLIC SUePPLY FROM THE DIFFERENT SOURCE FORMATIONS Its KINGS, QUEENS, ANDo NASSAU COUNTIES. MY. NOTE AS OF 1950 CRETACEOUS IS DIVIDED INTO MACDOTlY AND LLOYD COMPONER1S. (Reference 8) TABLE 30 (References 7,8,9,10 & 11) Queens Co. Pumpage by'Use (mgd) Public Supply Industrial** Agriculture 1950 51.2 14.5 (9.3) 0 1966 57.6 17.2 (6.5) 0 1973 65.1 39.07* (16.0 estimated) 0 * Includes Kings Co. (24.83) ** Values in parenthesis is the amount of water "wasted." The difference in values is the amount recharged. Queens Co. Pumpage by Aquifer (Public Supply Only)* Upper Pleistocene Jameco Magothy Lloyd Total 1950 29.94 5.49 8.78 6.74 50.94 1964 32.10 2.30 19.8 4.1 58.4 1973** 32.46 3.14 31.95 6.6 65.15 * Woodhaven and Jamaica Plants ** Does not include 1973 Kings Co. Use (24.83) Nassau Co. Pumpage by Use (mgd) Public Supply Industrial** Agriculture 1950 100 mgd 8.8 (2.7) 0.9 1966 185 mgd 29.7 (22.4) 0.2 1973 178.48 35.63 (28.5) 0.8 mgd (estimate **Values in parenthesis is the amount of water "wasted." The difference in values is the amount recharged. Nassau Co. Pumpage by Aquifer (Public Supply) Upper Pleistocene Jameco Magothy Lloyd Total Use 1950 52.9' 6.3 32.20 9.4 100.6 1966 21.24 5.46 143.75 14.80 185.25 1973 7.60 4.95 153.06 12.84 178.45 VIII-12 TABLE 30 (Cont'd) Nassau Co. Projected Water Use (Major Suppliers) 1990 226.44 mgd 2000 251.00 mgd 2020 304.77 mgd Suffolk Co. Pumpage by Use (mgd) Public Supply Industrial** Agriculture Private Domestic I 1950 24.3 12.4 (7.3) 5.6 -- 1966 75.1 36.3 (27.4) 18.7 -- 1973 102.36 39.24 (31.0 8.56 27.5 estimatet estimated) **Values in parenthesis is the amount of water "wasted." The difference in the values is the amount recharged. Suffolk Co. Pumpage by Aquifer (Public Supply) Upper Pleistocene Magothy Lloyd Total Use 1950 22.1 1.3 .30 23.7 1966 41.5 33.4 .43 75.33 1973 72.3 57.3 .3 129.9 Suffolk Co. Projected Water Usage (Major Suppliers) 1980 465.45 mgd 2000 885.64 mgd 2020 1229.91 mgd VIII-13 4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Figure 35 Long Island W~ater Table Elevation, MSL NEW CONNECTICUT~S7~ YORK - NEW -- - ~~~~JERSE~Y 0tv h- (a) Natural Water Table (Reference1) (b) 1936 Water Table (Reference'12) (c) 1961. (Reference 1,3) ATLANTIC OCEAN (d) 1974 (Reference 14) VIII-14 Water withdrawals from various sources, including use of surface water, for public supply from 1904-1950, are illustrated as Figure 34. Pumpage by use and aquifer for 1950, 66 and 73 are shown in Table 30. General pumping trends indicate decreased pumpage of the Pleistocene aquifer, a large increase in the Magothy pumpage, and moderate increases in both the Jameco and Lloyd. Reduction in withdrawals from the Pleistocene is due to contamination by sewerage waste and resultant high nitrate, synthetic detergent and ammonia levels. Average daily pumpage from 1940 projected to 2020 are shown on Table 30. Water table maps indicate a slow-gradual decline in water levels from 1903 to 1956, no change from 1956 to 1959 and the maximum lowering (partly due to drought conditions) 15 feet in Hicksville from 1959 to 1967. The rapid lowering of the water table is accounted for by drought conditions and the effects of sewering. Increased pumping in Queens also contributed to lowering the water table levels in southwestern Nassau Co. Water Table contours are also illustrated in Figure 35. Suffolk County (except for Fisher Island) like Nassau, relies solely on groundwater. Pumpage in the county occurred primarily in the glacial materials. Except for parts of western Suffolk County, the quantity of withdrawals of water from from the glacial materials were 23.9 mgd in 1950 and rose to 62.7 mgd in 1967. The drought years saw pumpting up to 78.9 mgd in 1964. Magothy pumping ranged from 4.2 mad in 1950 to 38.0 mgd in 1967 with a high of 44.7 mgd in 1967. The lowest pumpage has been from the Lloyd and ranges from 0.13 mgd in 1960 to 0.16 mgd in 1967. In 1963, the withdrawal from the Lloyd went to 0.57 mgd due to drought conditions. Table 30 illustrates pumpage by use, and from the aquifers used in Suffolk County, also included are projected water needs for 1980, 2000, 2020. VIII.5. Groundwater Exploration Subsurface exploration to determine the extent of aquifers, their characteristics (hydraulic conductivity, head relationships and flow direction) VIII-15 and quality of groundwater was undertaken in the mid-island area of Suffolk County in 1963. The area of study extended from the Nassau County Line 20 miles into Suffolk County to the unincorporated hamlet of Lake Ronkonkoma. The area is approximately 7 miles wide and occupies the center portion of the island. The results of this exploration are summarized in a report by Julian Soren 1971 (L.I. WR Bull. I). Pumpage in the mid-island area could provide an average yield of 100-200 mgd for several decades as reported by Soren. Net withdrawals, and consumptive use, would cause a decline in water levels and salt water intrusion. In addition to the above mentioned type of exploration, investigations have been undertaken to determine aquifer characteristics. These investigations are an important step in the determination of proper management of the aquifer systems. The studies involve subsurface mapping of geologic units as well as determination of head relationships, hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, storage coefficients and location of the fresh-saltwater interface. The USGS has been the primary investigator and has published reports on their findings as Hydrologic Investigation Atlas'- (5, 15, 16). The Atlas' mentioned above are usually done on a county size basis, specific site investigations or studies are found in the USGS Water Supply Papers. These reports detail various aspects such as geology, geohydrology, hydrology, recharge basins, etc. (References 10, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22). VIII.6. Effect of Urbanization The effects of urbanization have been mentioned previously but will be reiterated here because of their profound impact to the natural hydrologic system. (Figure 30 vs. Figure 36.) The most apparent result of urbanization is the increased demand for water accompanied by increased waste water for disposal. Urbanization has increased to the point in some places that the groundwater VIII-16 ISPE EXPLANATION ATMOSPHERE A H ERSolid lines represent flow of liquid water PRECIPITATION EVAPOTRANSPIRATION Dashed lines represent movement of water vapor EVAPOTRANSPIRATION I f ----.-- -----__ EVAPORATION BASINS Irlr c.r Iyruu r/�SURFACE WATER I OUTFLOW ~~t~~~~~~~t I 0 II I EVAPOTRANSPIR ATiON INFILTRATION Z ( -I- ZON AERATION 1 .. E PERCOLATION SEEPAGE AND AND SEPTIC T i . W PIC . . _ 4 |WATER~~~~ SEAENtSPRIN FLOW RE STR A SEWAGE-EFFLUENT AND CESSPOOLS PIPES WELLS WER DRAOUTFLOW srstssw-'.I - tEXPORTED N . i �-|~ ~. [ ; r r WATER OUTFLOW ZONE OF SATUION SUBSRFACE ZONE OF SATURATION K SUBSURFACE OUTFLOW [.IGURE 36 Hydrologic Cycle As Influenced By Man VIII-17 system has not been replenished at a sufficient rate to keep pace with pumpage. Where this groundwater mining occurs, primarily western Long Island, the water table has dropped allowing an advancement of the fresh-salt water interface landward. To dispose of the waste water, sewers have been installed in the heavily urbanized areas of the island. The primary effect of the sewers has been mentioned but the secondary problem of seepage from groundwater into the sewer systems has not. In areas where the water table is close to the surface, storm and sanitary sever lines intersect the water table and act as drains to the groundwater. Estimates of this loss are as high as 20 mgd (Reference 1, 2). In areas where the water table is not intersected, recharge to the aquifer (Reference 1) takes place but figures on the amount of compensation are not available. Another feature of urbanization, loss of permeable ground materials also changes the groundwater conditions. The loss is due to paving of streets, parking lots and highways and the building of housing development, shopping centers and industrial complexes. The amount of loss was determined by Sawyer (Effect of Urbanization on Storm Discharge and Ground Water Recharge in Nassau Co., New York, 1963,1 USGS Prof. Paper 475-C) by studying changes in flow in two streams, one in an urbanized area, the other rural. Both streams have long coincident periods of flow record (1938-1960) so "before and after1' urbanization comparisons can be made. According to Sawyer, the loss of groundwater recharge amounted to 63,000 gallons per day in the developed area of 10 square miles. This, loss of recharge is nearly tota~lly offset by collection systems and recharge basins and will be discussed in Section VIII.7. Another result of urbanization is the loss of groundwater due to lawn sprinkling. This consumptive use is most apparent during long hot spells and drought conditions. The loss, which ranges from 25-50% of total sprinkling VIII-18 is due to evapotranspiration. In 1965, public supply loss due to evapotrans- piration was figured to be about 20 mgd. This amount does not include loss from private, "backyard," wells that are used for fawn sprinkling. VIII.7. Recharge Basins Recharge basins to replenish groundwater have been used on Long Island for over 40 years. In 1950, the number of recharge basins was 14 (Reference 23). Due to urbanization and increases in area covered by impervious surfaces the number rose to over 2,000 in 1969 and is projected to reach 5,000 (Reference 23) as development moves eastward. The basic recharge basin is an open pit excavated 10-15 feet below land surface and averaging between 1 to 2 acres in size. A few reach 30 acres in size and some 40 feet deep. Construction is usually in sandy or gravelly material although some have natural bottoms of less pervious materials. The latter often contains water. Storm water is delivered to the basins by storm sewers and inlet structures. More elaborate basins have terraced interiors, stilling basins for sediment accumulation, overflow structures, and diffusion wells. Depth of construction is dependent on the distance to the water table. The amount of inflow to the basins varies but is roughly equivalent to the percentage of impervious areas served by the basins. In 1969, the area drained by basins was approximately 73,000 acres with a total of 148 mgd being recharged. This amount includes recharge through open areas and lawns that amount to 87-mgd. The remaining 61 mgd of recharge through basins compares favorably with natural areas, i.e., lawns and open areas in their effectiveness. VIII.8. Groundwater Quality Groundwater quality under natural conditions, before the influence of man, was of excellent quality. The only constituent that "degraded" the original quality was iron with the original iron content of waters in the Magothy and VIII-19 Lloyd aquifers being about 0.61 ppm and 1.5 ppm, respectively. The glacial aquifer iron content was about 0.01 ppm. Since water in Phase I type develop- ment was pumped from the glacial aquifer, a supply of excellent quality water was available in most places. Those wells located near bodies of salt water may have encountered naturally occurring, not induced by pumping, salty water. Under the influence of man, the quality of groundwater has deteriorated to such an extent that in some places it is unuseable. The deterioration has followed the pattern of development from west to east. Groundwater in many places in the eastern portion of the island is still of near pristine quality. Increased demand for water resulted in public supplies but the disposal of waste was still through individual septic systems. Deeper wells were installed to stratigraphically lower aquifers and pumpage increased causing-the lowering of the water table by downward migration of water in the glacial materials. These increases caused the contamination of groundwater in two ways: (1) The landward movement of the salt water boundary on the south shore, and; (2) The downward migration of inferior quality water from the glacial materials that had received enormous volumes of waste water. Recently, 1960's to date, studies to assess the nature of groundwater contaminants and their effects, have been undertaken. The studies were begun because of the severe contamination of groundwaters and the threat to public health in Nassau and western most Suffolk Co. The USGS is soon to publish a .groundwater quality map as part of the 208 study. The relative order of importance of contamination has been estimated by Holzmacher (CPWS-24) for Suffolk County. The only difference found in Nassau County is that the extent of nitrate contamination has probably increased.� A brief description of these contaminants follows: VIII-20 1. Synthetic Detergents. This contaminant, detected by methylene blue active substance (EBAS), is more of an indicator of contamination by sewerage rather than a threat to health. The MBAS indicates linear alkyl-benzene sulfonate (IAS), the prime ingredient of synthetic deter- gents. The IAS reaches groundwater primarily through septic systems. The standard of 0.5 ppm for drinking supplies is due to the odor, taste and foam caused by 1AS at or above this concentration. Although there are numerous interferences, the 0.5 ppm indicates that at least 5% (Reference 10) of the water has been derived from sewerage. 2. Nitrates. Nitrates are also derived from sewerage andare included in the standards specifically for health reasons. Two standards exist, the United States Public Health Service recommendation of 45 ppm as nitrates and the N.Y.S. Health Department Standard of 10 ppm, measured as nitrogen. Concentrations of nitrates can cause poisoning in some infants called methomoglobenimia. Susceptibility to this sickness varies among people. Nitrate studies in Nassau County indicate over 24% of wells show increasing nitrate levels and that one well per year will become unuseable due to nitrate contamination for the next 50 years, 16% of the public supplies. A USGS report by Koch and Perimutter presents an analysis of nitrate contamination and provides short and long-term nitrate trends in the glacial and Magothy aquifer. Other sources of nitrate pollution include fertilizers, surface runoff and landfills. Treatment of waters high in nitrates is primarily by blending with acceptable quality water. In agricultural areas of Long Island, primarily eastern Suffolk County, fertilizers containing nitrogen compounds have been used extensively to increase crop yields. The affect of these nitrogen compounds has not been completely investi- gated but in one instance, the nitrogen concentration reached 12ppm. (References 10, 24 and 25). VIII-21 Contributions of nitrogen to groundwater from various sources are as follows: Source Contribution No-fertilized agricultural area 3 #/acre/yr. Fertilized agricultural areas 55 #/acre/yr. Surface runoff (residential light 21 lbs. commercial area) Unsewered developed Suffolk Co. 50.5 #/yr./family (cesspools) Nassau County 185 #/acre/yr. Sewage plants discharging to 1560 #/day groundwater (References 24, 26) The 208 study is presently investigating the non-point sources of nitrates and their effect on groundwater quality. 3. Iron and Magnesium. The "contaminants" occur naturally but when concentrations are 0.3 ppm or greater, the water becomes excessively corrosive and iron bacterial growths may cause clogging of pipes and discolorations of laundered materials. 4. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). The standard for TDS is 500 ppm based on taste. Eastern Suffolk County groundwater may contain high TDS due to salinity. Groundwater affected by landfills may also be high in TDS. 5. Chlorides and Sulfates. High chlorides occur as a result of salt water contamination but may also indicate sewerage contamination. The chloride limit of 250 ppm is based on health effects. Sulfates occur naturally as a result of decay of organic material. The standard of 250 ppm is based on the laxative effect on some people. Sulfates may also be contributed to the groundwater by leaching of waste in landfills and air pollution (Reference 23). VIII-22 6. Toxic Materials. These materials include arsenic, barium, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, copper, lead, cyanide, silver, phenols, zinc, selenium, floride carbon chloroform extract and others. The occurrence of these materials is primarily the result of industrial waste dis- charges and landfills. The standards vary from item to item. Under the ongoing 208 study, the occurrence and effect of nitrates and toxic materials on the ground-water are being investigated. VIII.9. Long Island Groundwater Management One of the first sections of this Chapter pertained to the hydrologic cycle and the basic elements thereof (see Figure 30.) Subsequent to that Section, it may seem that the hydrologic cycle was disregarded. To tie all elements of the groundwater section together, we must again return our attention to the hydrologic cycle, for the basis of any management policies or practices lies in an understanding of the formula: Inf low =Outflow t change in storage. Modification to any element in the formula obviously will have a direct effect on the other elements; whether the modification is tolerable or not depends on society. At present, the hydrologic cycle formula is not in balance due to a negative (decreasing) change in storage. This change has led to declining groundwater levels, decreasing stream flow and deterioration of groundwater quality. Technically, to achieve a balance in the equation may or may not be socially acceptable, depending on various factors such as cost and aesthetic values. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss the social aspects of groundwater management, but it will be these factors that will guide policy decisions. To change the inflow portion of the equation, it is necessary to find * ~additional sources of water. It is apparent that within the Is land there is little possibility to find additional water. In fact,, Nassau County is VIII-23 projected to have a water shortage by 1980, the Suffolk County supply is pro- jected to be sufficient into the next centiary. One additional "outside" source is the present New York City supply system. New York City, however, has no obligation to furnish water to locations to Nassau or Suffolk Counties and, in light of the fact that under drought conditions (as in 1965-66), there was a shortage in the New York City system, it seems unlikely supply arrangements could be made to Nassau and/or Suffolk Counties. Another scheme of water importation, derived additional supply from Connecticut or northeast New Jersey. Like the New York City system, the drought indicated that additional water was unavailable. The establishment of a Long Island Sound Reservoir has also been suggested. Under this scheme, a dam structure located toward the eastern end of the Island would control (prevent) the inflow of salt water. The fresh water following into the Sound would replace the salt water and, thus, be available as a water supply. The legal implications of the above proposals are staggering, but the concepts are mentioned here for discussion purposes. Recent advances in technology are making the desalination of salt water more and more feasible. Presently, the Office of Saline Waters of the U. S. Department of Interior, lists 13 methods of desalination. The 13 methods fall under the headings of (1) distillation, (2) membranes, (3) freezing, (4) humidifi- cation, and (5) chemical processes. Cost, however, is still the major drawback to this proposal although the Riverhead Water District has considered buying desalted water from a proposed nuclear plant. A further drawback is the 950 temperature of the desalted water, compared with the 550 temperature of the present supply. The high temperature and possible change in flow direction within some of the mains, may cause high turbidity, color and unacceptable taste of the delivered water. Vill-24 Water reuse is presently being used on Long Island, more as a secondary result than a planned program. The discharge of septic tanks and cesspools to the Upper Glacial Aquifer helps to maintain water levels but has the obvious effect of degrading water quality. The use of recharge basins is a more planned water reuse system. A discussion of recharge basins was made previously. The use of recharge wells to return water to the ground-water system has been practiced since the passage of regulations on groundwater withdrawal around 1933. In most cases, the water recharged was air conditioning water. At Bay Park (Reference 27), a study has been undertaken to recharge "reclaimed" water (tertiary treated sewage) to the Magothy aquifers. The results of the study, as mentioned in Reference 27, show the method to be impractical under present technology. Another scheme, using highly treated waste water, would be to recharge the water along the coast with closely spaced injection wells. The effect of this recharge plan would be to form a pressure ridge parallel to the coast. The ridge would have a gradient landward and seaward and, thus, reduce sub- surface outflow and salt water intrusion. One of the drawbacks to this scheme is that eventually the injected waste water would reach supply wells. The time factor and resultant water quality aspects of this plan are being evaluated (Reference 13). As indicated in an earlier section of this report (Table 29), it was shown that about 320 mgd of groundwater discharges to streams which, in turn flow into salty surface water bodies. This outflow of water could be salvaged using shallow skimming wells and pumping galleries adjacent to streams. Large volumes of water could be removed without lowering groundwater levels signifi- cantly. Stream flow, however, would reduce significantly and thus upset the ecological balance in the bays and estuaries. Since the water salvaged is derived in part by discharges from cesspools and septic tanks, the quality of water may be questionable and require treatment. VIII-25 Another management technique would be to reduce water use. As living conditions improve, water consumptions increase, to counter balance this a metering system would be used to limit water use by economic measures. Additional water might be saved by lowering water pressures. Both of these techniques would have the net effect of increasing water supply by lowering demand. An additional large quantity of groundwater could be realized if the fresh water-salt water interface were allowed to move landward. The planned over- development would lower the hydraulic gradient (head) and thus decrease outflow from the system. Salt water contamination of some wells would occur under this plan. VIII.10. Groundwater Classification and Standards Groundwater classifications, and standards, are based upon the best usage of such resources. Since Long Island relies almost entirely on the groundwater resources for potable water supply, the classification GA has been adopted to reflect this best usage. No discharges which may impair the quality of water are accepted. Discharges must meet standards at the point of discharge. Two other classifications have been adopted and reflect the quality of groundwater prior to use. Class GSA are natural saline water whose best use is conversion to potable waters or the manufacture of sodium chloride or related products. Class GSB groundwater is water having an excess of 1,000 ppm of chloride or a total dissolved solids content of 2,000 ppm. These waters are best used as receiving waters for the disposal of waste. The GSB class can only be assigned following a hearing. The classifications are set forth in Part 703 under the authority of Section 1208, Article 12 of the Public Health Law. In order to preserve the best usage classification, it is necessary to establish standards. The standards adopted to date represent the maximum allowable concentration at the point of discharge. Under existing regulations, two sets of standards apply: (1) discharge to unconsolidated materials, and VIII-26 (2) discharge to consolidated rock. An excerpt from Part 703 of Public Law 1205 gives a comparison of these standards and is presented in Table 27. The above rules and regulations have been adopted by New York State agencies (DEC and the Health Department). Presently, the New York State standards are under- going review and revision. On the Federal level, two other agencies are involved with groundwater quality. The U. S. Public Health Service has recommended a set of standards and the Environmental Protectio n Agency adopted regulations under the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act that rescinds Federal funds to projects that may con- taminate groundwaters where that resource is judged by EPA upon petition or on their own to be the sole source of drinking water supply. Such a petition has been made to the EPA to protect Long island's groundwater supply. VIII.1l. Groundwater Monitoring Programs Quality The Nassau County Health Department presently monitors 559 wells for chemical quality that includes iron, manganese, carbon dioxide, ammonia, albu- minoid, nitrate, nitrate, oxygen consumed, chloride, hardness, alkalinity, pH, total solids, specific conductance, MEAS, dissolved oxygen, hexavalent chromium, temperature, phosphate, sodium and sulphate. Special analysis includes copper, zinc, lead, cadmium, nickel, phenals, barium, floride, cyanide and aluminum. The wells sampled are major public suppliers, quasi-public wells, private wells and observation wells. Of the 559, 409 are Magothy, 97 glacial, 48 Lloyd and 5 Jameco. In Suffolk County, 285 wells are sampled on a yearly basis for full chemical analysis by Suffolk County Department of Environmental Control. These include 195 observation wells, 40 wells at various STP's and from 50-75 fire wells. In addition to chemical analysis, water levels are recorded for 235, 195 ob- O ~servation wells and 40 STP wells, quarterly. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the Suffolk County Water Authority conjunctively sample VIII-27 195 public wells, nearly all of -which are in the Magothy, and 118 quasi-public wells, 100 of which are in the glacial aquifer. VIII.12. United States Geological Survey Ground-water Program The USGS Cooperative Program began in 1931 to provide data on groundwater development in western Long Island to the New York State Water Power and Control Commission. Over the years, the program has grown considerably to more than one million dollars. On Long Island, the cooperative agreement is between the Geological Survey, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Suffolk County Department of Environmental Control, Suffolk County Water Authority and the Nassau County Department of Public Works. The majority of the funding dor the cooperative (50-50) program an Long Is land presently comes from Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Three basic phases of study are recognizable under the present program: 1. Data Acqiuisition: This phase involves studies to refine the infor- mation on Long Island hydro~geology, obtain basic data on geology, hydrogeology and water quality for application to computer analysis techniques. 2. Water Quality Appraisal: Under this plan, the effects of man, urbanization, etc. are related to changes in water quality. This phase includes studies on salt water encroachment, nitrate pollution and leachate from sanitary landfills. 3. Compilation: Ultimately, the above phases will be integrated with various conservation and management techniques to develop mathematical models of the groundwater system which will aid policy and decision making for the best management of the groundwater of Long island. A list of publications of the USGS Cooperative Program up to 1967 is included in "Bibliography of the Ground-Water Resources of New York Through 1967.1! An update of USGS publications is found in "Water Resources Investigation in New York, 1973." VIII-28 VIII.13. Groundwater Legislation and Policy 9 ~~Ground-water legislation began in New York around 1933 with the passage of Section 521-a, Chapter 563 of the Conservation Law. This Law was adopted because of the severe lowering of the water table on Long Island due to uncontrolled withdrawal. The severe conditions were brought to light when a water table map was published in 1933, the first map since 1903. It was very evident from these maps that controls on groundwater withdrawal must be enacted. The Water Power and Control Commission was given the authority to regulate the installation of new large wells by a review and permit system due to the emergency condition of the water table on Long Island. This Law, however, did nothing to control rehabilitation and pumping of existing wells. Another feature of this Law required the groundwater used for air conditioning and refrigeration to be returned to the aquifer it was withdrawn from. Additional legislation came in the form of well driller licensing under Section 521-b, Chapter 338 effective O ~1935. This Law facilitated the administration of Section 521-a by requiring -well drillers on Long Island to be licensed. Today's laws concerning ground-water on Long Island are much the same as those mentioned above. The size of the wells that require permits is now 45 gpm instead of the 69.44 gpm rate (100,000 gpd) of the original bill, Section 521-a. In recent years, the Department of Environmental Conservation has attempted to formulate a policy regarding the groundwater of Long Island. Several draft policy statements were written, none of which were satisfactory to all parties involved, i.e. Federal, State and County governments. Any new attempts at writing the policy statement have been postponed until the ongoing Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan, Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution * ~Control Act (1972) is complete. VIII-29 REFERENCES 1. "Summary of the Hydrologic Situation on Long Island, N.Y. as a Guide to Water-Management Alternatives," O. L. Franke and N. E. McClymonds, USGS, 1972. 2. "An Atlas of Long Island's Water Resources," NYS Water Resources Commission, 1968, Bulletin 62. 3. "Mapping of Geologic Formations and Aquifers of Long Island, N.Y." R. Suter, USGS, GW-18, 1949. 4. "Hydrogeologic Data From Selected Wells and Test Holes in Suffolk County, Long Island, N.Y.," H. M. Jensen and Julian Soren, USGS, Long Island Water Resources 1971. 5. "Water Transmitting Properties of Aquifers on Long Island, N.Y.," N. E. McClymonds and O. L. Franke, USGS, 1972. 6. "Engineering Report on the Water Supplies of Long Island," R. Suter, New York Water Power and Control Comm. Bull GW-2, 1937. 7. "Groundwater in Bronx, New York, and Richmond Counties with Summary Data on Kings and Queens Counties, New York City, New York," N. M. Perimutter and T. Arnow, USGS, GW-32, 1953. 8. "Withdrawal of Ground Water on L.I., 1952" GW-28. 9. "Comprehensive Public Water Supply Study, CPWS-60 for Nassau Co.," Greeley and Hansen, 1971. 10. "Comprehensive Public Water Supply Study for Suffolk County, N.Y.," CPWS-24, Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell Consulting Engineers, 1970. 11. "Long Island Water Resources," NYS Office of Planning Coordination, 1970. 12. "The Changing Pattern of Ground-Water Development on Long Island, N.Y." R. C. Heath, R. L. Foxworthy and P. Cohen, USGS, 1966. 13. "The Water Table on Long Island, New York in March 1974," Edward J. Koszalka, USGS Long Island Water Resources, 1975. 14. "Hydrogeology of Suffolk County, Long Island, N.Y.," H. M. Jensen, Julian Soren, USGS, 1974. 15. "Hydrogeology Along the Proposed Barrier-Recharge-Well Alinement in Southern Nassau County, Long Island, New York," Ku, Vecchioli, Cerrillo, 1975. 16. "Regional Rates of Ground-Water Movement on Long Island, N.Y.," O. L. Franke and P. Cohen, USGS, 1972. 17. "Design and Construction of a Unique Injection Well on Long Island, N.Y.," P. Cohen and C. N. Dufor, USGS, 1966. VIII-30 -2- 18. "Geology and Hydrology of Northeast Nassau County, Long Island," J. Isbister, USGS, 1966. 19. "Salt-Water Encroachment in Southern Nassau and Southeastern Queens Counties, Long Island, N.Y." N. J. Lusczynski and W. V. Swarzenski, USGS, 1966. 20. "Hydrologic Interpretations Based on Infrared Imagery of Long Island, N.Y.,'` E. J. Pluhowski, USGS, 1972. 21. "Hydrologic Effects of the 1962-66 Drought on Long Island, N.Y.," P. Cohen, 0. L. Franke and N. E. McClymonds, USGS, 1969. 22. "Influence of Recharge Basins on the Hydrology of Nassau and Suffolk Co., L.I., N.Y.," G. Seaburn and D. Aronson, USGS WSP-2031. 23. "Nitrate Summary" Suffolk Co. Department of Environmental Control, 1973. 24. "Preliminary Hydrogeologic Appraisal of Nitrate in Ground-Water and Streams, Southern Nassau County, Long Island, N.Y.," N. M. Perlmutter and E. Koch, USGS, 1972. 25. "Report on Nitrate Pollution of Groundwater," Nassau Co. Department of Health, 1969. 26. "Report on Untreated Water Quality for Public Water Supply Wells in Nassau Co.," Nassau Co. Department of Health, 1973. 27. "Integrated Water Supply and Waste Water Disposal on Long Island," prepared by the Center for the Environment and Man, Inc. 1972. 28. "The Long Island Ground Water Pollution Study," NYS Health Dept., 1969. 29. "Ground Water Recharge on Long Island," Arthur H. Johnson, 1948. 30. "The Water Table in L.I., N.Y., in Jan. 1951," GW-27. 31. "The Water Table on Long Island, New York in March 1970," Grant E. Kimmel, USGS, Long Island Water Resources 1971. 32. "Summary of Studies and Research Related to Artificial Recharge of Treated Waste Water in Suffolk Co., N.Y., Suffolk Co. Department of Environmental Control, 1972. 33. "Preliminary Feasibility Study on the Recharge of Treated Waste Water," Suffolk Co. Department of Environmental Control, 1972. 34. "Effect of Urbanization on Storm Discharge and Ground-Water Recharge in Nassau Co., N.Y." R. M. Sawyer, USGS, 1963. 35. "Effect of Synthetic Detergents on the Ground Waters of Long Island, New York," N.Y.S. Department of Health, 1957, VIII-31 -3- 36. "Proceedings of the Seminar on Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Disposal," Regional Marine Resources Council of Nassau-Suffolk Regional 0 Planning Board, USEPA, USGS, 1971. 37. "Hydrogeochemical Data From Investigations of Water Quality in Sewered and Unsewered Areas, Southern Nassau County, L.I., N.Y.," N.M. Perimutter and E. Koch, USGS, 1975. 38. "Environmental and Planning Aspects of Waste Water Treatment Practices on Long Island, New York," Suffolk Co. Department of Environmental Control, 1972. 39. "Underground Waters of Nassau Co., "NYS Department of Health, 1964. 40. "Chloride Concentration and Temperature of the Waters of Nassau Co., Long Island, N.Y.," F. A. DeLuca, J. F. Hoffman and E. R. Lublee, USGS, GW-55, 1965. 41. "The Precipitation Regime of Long Island, N.Y.," J. F. Miller and R. H. Frederick, USGS, 1969. 42. "Geohydrology of the Artificial-Recharge Site at Bay Park, L.I., N.Y.," Vecchioli, Bennett, Pearson and Cerrillo, USGS, 1974. 43. "The Water Table in the Western and Central Parts of L.I., N.Y. 1945" GW-12. 44. "Configuration of the Rock Flood in Western L.I., N.Y., 1948" - GW-13. 45. "Water-Level Surface in the Aquifers of Western Long Island, N.Y. in 1959 and 1970," G. E. Kimmel, USGS, 1971. 46. "Appraisal of Operating Efficiency of Recharge Basin on Long Island, New York in 1969," D. A. Aronson and G. E. Seaburn, USGS, 1974. 47. "An Assessment of the Viral Hazard Associated with Various Long Island Aquatic Resources," J. M. Vaughn, 1975, Brookhaven National Laboratory. 48. "Feasibility of a Hele-Shaw Model Study of Contaminant Motion in the Long Island Aquifer System," Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrel Consulting Engineers, 1970. 49. "Model Study Relating Recharge, Distribution of Hydraulic Conductivity and Ground-Water Level Elevations for Selected Cross-Sections of the Ground-Water Reservoir in Western Suffolk Co., N.Y." O. L. Franke, Consulting Hydrogeologist. 50. "Preliminary Evaluation of the Hydrologic Effects of Sewering Planned for Southwest Suffolk Co., N.Y. - Phase I," O. L. Franke, Consulting Hydrogeologist, 1973. 51. "Wastewater Reclamation and Recharge, Bay Park, N.Y." J. Vecchioli, J. Oliva, S. Ragone and H. F. Ku, USGS, 1975. VIII-32 -4- 52. "Water Recharge Considerations Confronting Suffolk County," Suffolk County Department of Environmental Control, 1971. 53. "Summary of Studies and Research Related to Artificial Recharge of Treated Water in Suffolk County, N.Y." Suffolk County Department of Environmental Control, 1972. 54. "Pollution and Water Supply of the Town of Southampton" Flynn & Mahoney Consulting Engineers, 1967. 55. "The Flow of Contaminants in the Saturated Zone," Ellis Koch, 1974. 56. "Record of Wells in Suffolk Co., N.Y." GW-31, 1952. 57. "Saline Waters in N.Y.S. Long Island, Staten Island & Manhattan 1956" GW-36. 58. "Ground-Water Levels and Related Hydrologic Data from Selected Observation Wells in Nassau County, Long Island, New York," John Isbister, USGS, 1959 GW-41. 59. "Urbanization and Its Effect on the Temperature of the Streams on Long Island, N.Y.," Edward J. Pluhowski, USGS, 1970. Analog - Model Analysis of the Effect of Waste Water Management on the Groundwater Reservoir in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, L.I., N.Y. Report 1: Proposed and Current Sewerage, G. E. Kimmel, A. W. Harbaugh, USGS, Open File Report 76-441. VIII-33 APPENDICES A. Water Resources Summary, U.S.GoSo B. Current Differences and Other Constants, N.O.A.A. C. Tidal Differences and Other Constants, N.O.A.A. D. Surface Waste Source Discharge Inventory, D.E.C. E. 1972 (Feb.) Municipal S.ToW. Inventory, DoE.C. F. Waters Closed to Shellfish Harvesting, D.E.C. G. 1974 Needs Survey Summary, D.E.C. H. Status of Water Quality Improvement Projects, D.E.C. I. Status of M.S.T.W.'s Commenced Between 7/1/37 and 3/31/72, D EoC. J. Status of Inactive Grants Projects, D.E.C. K. Program Guidance Memorandum, Construction Grants No. 66, Water Quality Management SAM-1, EPA L. Drinking Water Supplies, Part 5, Chapter 1, NYS Sanitary Code M. Drinking Water Standards, Part 72, Chapter 11, NYS Administrative Rules and Regulations N. Stanford Water Company Watershed Restrictions O. Intermittent Stream Policy UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1505 Kellum Place Mineola, New York Water Resources Summary Long Island, New York [arch 1975 Prepared in cooperation with the NASSAU COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS NEW YORK STATE DEPART1IENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY ~A-1~ ~ L 0 ~~~~~~~~A-1 G GLOSSARY BAT, BATEA - Best Available Technology Ecomonically Achievable; under this terminology, effluent limits for certain categories and classes of point sources shall be implemented by July 1, 1983. This may be a more stringent level of treatment than the UPCTCA level. Batch Process '' A treatment process in which a tank or reactor is filled, the water is treated and the tank contents are released. BPT, BPCTCA - Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available; under this termi- nology, effluent limits are defined by the EPA administrator and must be met by July 1, 1977. BOD - Biochemical Oxygen Demand; a measure of the amount of oxygen consumed in biochemical decomposition of organic matter in water; a measure of the organic pollutant load. BODS - The amount of oxygen utilized in five days by biochemical decomposition processes. BODu - The amount of oxygen utilized in the complete biochemical stabilization of the carbonaceous portion of a waste. For municipal waste, typically 1.46 x BOOD5. cfs - Flow in cubic feet per second. COD - Chemical Oxygen Demand; indicates the quantity of chemically oxidizable organic compounds present in sewage or a water sample; COD will vary with water composition, concentration of reagent, temperature and other factors; a rough correlation between BOD and COD can be established. Coliform - The coliform group of bacterial organisms; a bacterial indicator of con- tamination; this group is always present in the intestinal tract of human beings and other animals but is also widely distributed in nature (in soil, on vegetation, etc.). DO - Dissolved Oxygen; oxygen dissolved in sewage, water or other liquid usually expressed in parts per million, milligrams per liter or per cent saturation. Effluent - Sewage or other liquid, partially or completely treated or in its untreated or natural state, as the case may be, flowing out of a treatment plant or pipe. Effluent Limitation - Any restriction limiting the quantity, rate or concentration of discharge from a point source. Effluent Limiting Segment - A stream segment which receives a waste discharge and either currently meets applicable stream standards ar is expected to meet such standards after the application of BPT limitations. A segment is bounded by; 1) the location of all waste disc.arges which mutually contribute to water quality degradation and, 2) by the downstream point of stream recovery to background conditions. EIS, EAS - Environmental Impact Statement, En-ironmental Assessment Statements - Under the National Environmental Plicy Act of 1969 (NEPA), environmental assessment (impact) statements are prepared for every federally funded project. These statements are revawed by EPA and recommendations of the project are submitted to the Presifent's Council on Environmental Ouality. New York State may also require an environmental statement in reviewing permits under Part 615, Title 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law. EPA - (United States) Environmental Protection Agency; the Federal organization charged with implementing the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. Eutrophic - Condition of a lake characterized by small depths, high primary pro- ductivity, abundance of littoral plants, high plankton density, presence of?plankton blooms, depletion of oxygen and absence of cold water fishes. Fecal Coliform - A tribe of bacterial organisms in the coliform group which originate in the intestines of warln blooded animals. FM - Force main. gpd - Flow in gallons per day. Infiltration - The entrance of groundwater into a pipe through joints, porous walls or breaks. Influent - Raw or partially treated sewage or other liquid flowing into a treatment plant. INT - Interceptor. Interceptor Sewer - A sewer which receives sewage flows from a system of lateral and trunk sewers and conveys such waters to a point for treatment or disposal. Kjeldahl N - Total oxidizable nitrogen as measured by organic and ammonia nitrogen. LUNR - Land Use and Natural Resource Inventory (of New York State). MA7CD/lO year - The minimum average seven day consecutive stream flow that occurs once in a ten year period. This or the minimum regulated flow, whichever is applicable, is used by the State in waste assimilation analyses and in determining effluent limitations for maintaining stream standards. Mesotrophic - Condition of a lake which exhibits characteristics which fall between the two extremes of lake primary productivity (see eutrophic and oligotrophic). mgd - Flow in millions of gallons per day. mg/l - Concentration in milligrams per liter; equivalent to ppm or parts per million for aqueous solutions. MOD - Modification in waste treatment strategy. MP - Mile point, normally measured upstream from the mouth. MSL - Mean Sea Level. MRF - Minimum Regulated Flow. Nitrification - The biochemical conversion of unoxidized nitrogenous matter (ammonia, nitrite and organic nitrogen) to oxidized nitrogen (nitrates). BOD is normally exerted in two distinct stages; the first is called the carbonaceous st8 and the second is called the nitrogenous stage. W NOD - Nitrogenous Oxygen Demand; the amount of oxygen required for nitrification to take place. Each unit of organic and ammonia nitrogen requires 4.57 units of oxygen for bio-oxidation to nitrate nitrogen. Non-Point Source - Any discreet source from which possible pollutants enter a waterway. Non- point sources include air-borne precipitates, stormwater runoff from rural and urban areas, sediment, benthic deposits and seepage from contaminated groundwater. NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; the Federal permitting system authorized under Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, applying to surface water discharges. Nutrients - Substances which are required to support living plants and organisms. Major nutrients are carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen and phosphorus. These nutrients especially nitrogen and phosphorus, when present in excess, can stimulate noxious levels of weed and algal growth. Oligotrophic - Condition of a lake characterized by large depths, low primary productivity, scarcity of littoral plants, low plankton density, absence of plankton blooms, little if any oxygen depletion in the hypolimnion, and presence of cold water fishes. Organic Pollutants - Harmful or objectionable matter whose source is of plant or animal origin. OS - Outfall sewer. Oxidation - The addition of oxygen, removal of hydrogen, or the removal or electrons from an element or compound. In wastewater treatment or in stream self- purification, organic matter is oxidized to more stable substances. Permit - A legally binding document issued by a State or Federal agency to the owner or manager of a point source discharge. The permit document contains a schedule of compliance requiring the permit holder to achieve a specified effluent limitation by a specified date. ['ermit documents also specify monitoring and reporting requirements to be conducted by the applicant. Phosphorus - A chemical element which acts as a nutrient for aquatic plant growth ant is often the limiting nutrient which determines whether rapid aquatic growth will occur. pH - A measure of the hydrogen ion concentration in water on an inverse logarithmic scale ranging from 0 to Il4. A pH of under 7 indicates rrore hydrogen ions and therefore more acidic solutions. A pit greater than 7 indicates a more alkaline solution. A pH of 7.0 is considered neutral, neither acidic nor alkaline. Point Source - Any discerible, confined and discreet conveyance from which pollutants .are or may be discharged. ppm - Concentration in parts per million; equivalent to mg/l or milligrams per liter. PS - Pumping station. PST - Permit Summary Table. Worksheet used to certify allowable effluent limits. Reach - A section of surface waters which has common hydrologic characteristics; common natural, physical, chemical and biological processes and has common reactions to external stresses, i.e. discharge of pollutants. S.D. - Sewer District. Secondary Treatment - Sewage treatment to produce 85% removal of 8OD5 and suspended solids or an average (30 day arithmetic mean) effluent concentration of 30 mg/1 for BOD5 and suspended solids, whichever is less. Segment - See water quality or effluent limiting segment. Sewage Treatment - This is a process in which solids in sewage are partially removed and partially changed by decomposition from complex highly putrescible organic solids to mineral or relatively stable organic solids. The extent of this change is dependent on the treatment processes involved. SMSA - Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area; an area composed of a county or group of contiguous counties which are socially and economically inte- grated and which contain at least one city with a minimum of 50,000 inhabitants. SPOES - State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; the State permitting system established to provide a permitting structure compatible with the xNES system in order that the eligibility for eventual State take-over of :he entire permitting system be assured. This system applies to surface and groundwater discharges and recognizes NPDES permits where they have -een issued. Species Diversity Index - Mathematical expressions for categorizing and describing the composition of biological organisms in a stream. Species diversity values of less than 1 indicate areas of heavy pollution, values from 1 to 3 indicate areas of moderate pollution and values greater than 3. indicate clean water conditions. SS - Sewerage system. Also used as abbreviation for suspended solids. STP - Sewage Treatment Plant. STP Add - Sewage Treatment Plant Addition. STP UP - Upgrading existing treatment plant. TOD - Total Oxygen Demand; TOD = Ultimate carbonaeeous BOD + Ultimate Nitrogenous BOD. UOD - Ultimate Oxygen Demand; The upper limit of biochemical oxidation. Used interchangeably with TOD. WAC - Waste assimilation capacity. Water Quality Limiting Segment - A stream segment which receives a waste discharge and which is not expected to meet applicable stream standards even after the application of !sT effluent limitations required by New York State or under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. The sagment is bounded by; 1) the location of all waste discharges which mutually contribute to water quality degradation and; 2) by the downstream point of stream recovery to background conditions. WWFR - Wastewater Facility Report, engineering report. _1 Streamflow in ?larcll was in tile normal range at the index station on Massanetua Creek at Mlassapequa. Average monthly discharge at the ' station was 12 cubic feet per second, compared with the normal for the month of 14.8 cubic feet per second. GRnOUID-l'ATER LEVELS .''] Cround-water levels in most wells rose. The twells listed in Table 1 are reasonably representative of the areas in which tile wells are found; and the average change in levels in these wells is assumed to be an index of the overall water-level ii 1 change in shallow aquifers on Long Island. Table 2 shows change in :... . . water levels in wells in other areas and in all aquifers. PPECIPITATIONI 3 0 Precipitation at Mineola was scattered throughout the month. <s--- Preliminary precipitation figures for 11arch 1975, for calendar year 1975, and departures from long-term averages for selected stations are given below (all figures in inches). Departure Cumulative Departure ! Station Precipitation from 1975 from Average Precipitation Average BridRgehampton 3.63 -0.85 15.94 +3.71 Kings Park 3.71 � .92 13.06 �+2. Gc4 I :'lneola 3.36 - .G9 12.08 +1.64 -n fakdale 3.19 - .45 12.17 +2.95 ..!f Riverhcad . 3.34 - .80 -14.27 +3.0t *X ( e olden '3.87 13.30 A-2 Table l.--Water levels measured in 14 selected wells in Nassau and Suffolk Counties at the end of March 1975 !: I : Water levels are in feet above or below (-) mean sea level. All wells are screened in thle upper glacial aquifer (water table). '.: Depth Water Net change since Well Location of well Level Last month Last year (feet) (feet) (feet) N3269 Old Westbury 5s 66.46 + .67 .69 N1259 Plainedge 4 52.53 + .50 - .16 M- n263 Levittoan 2 51.78 + .53 - .44 N1614 Carden City Park 53 51.26 + .25 -1.40 Nt615 East Mteadow 33 42.12 + .42 + .09 N1616 Westburv 68 75.78 + .34 - .18 S1P03 Babhlon 19 17.21 + .03 +1.66 Sl805 alavwood 29 41.75 + .60 - .32 S1806 Pinela-mn 44 55.00 + .74 - 04 S1807 West Islio 8 20.75 - .44 - .68 S1808 I!est Islip 15 10.60 + .01 � .31 S1809 Brightwaters 29 29.33 + .50 - .70 S1810 Brentwood 57 51.63 +1.42 - .21 Average water level, 14 wells 44.06 + .'39 - .34 Hiphest average water level, 50.99 (April 1939); lowest average water level, 39.45 (Aupust 1966). Extremes are based on records from 1912 to 1918 and 1932 to present. *ater level affected by tide LD Lowest daily reading I'D FIichest daily reading MD Dailv rean reading R a-ntcr-sta-e rccordcr IIT '!easured near high tide 1/ Screened in !nagothlr aquifer 2/ Hydraulically connected with Lloyd 3/ Water level unobtainable A-3 Table 2.--atecr levels in water-table and artesian welis at the cnd of llarch 1975 "- I Water levels are in feet aboce or below (-) mean sea level (see page 2 for explanation of symbols). ; Depth Water Net change since Well Location of well Level Last month Last year (feet) (feet) (feet) ''' i jr, . Upper glacial aquifer (water-table) 01254 Richmond �Hill 65 2.2 +0.5 +3.2 :'!;': , 02346 Flushing 17 16.3 - .3 + .9 :, :! M11(9 Elmont 37 10.7 + .5 -1.0 N1129 West Hempstead 43 24.2 + .4 -1.0 Nl243 Cold Spring 22 56.8 .0 - .8 11117O Creat Neck 62 20.0 + ,1 -1.4 ri7309 Munsev Park 199 39.7 + .2 - .7 ~P--'~i S1812 East Ilauppauge 39 47.6 + .6 - .9 � -.? ; SIP113 Ronkonkoma 39 39.4 + .3 - .6 S:, S3513 Selden 65 64.7 + ..3 - .9 S3514 Commack 95 71.8 .0 +1.3 S3521 Mledrord 50 37.9 +"' .3 + .3 : ,S3543 IWesthampton 58 18.0 + .4 - .4 54271 Riverhead 105 10.9 + .2 - .9 S5517 Unton 91 40.9 + .3 - .5 S6411 Shoreham 149 32.0 + .7 - .2 : S6439 kYoriches 42 24.6 + .4 - .8 S8839 Amagansett 37 8.0 + .5 .0 Sl6874 M'elville 82 73.2 + .2 -1.0 S24771 Brentwood 220 55.8 + .8 - .i S40849 South Setauket 61/ 42.9 ' + .3 -3.7 A-4 o- . -, -. i.~ Table 2.--Later levels in water-table and artesian wells at the end of '.arch 1975- . ~' continued . . E ater levels are in feet above or below (-) mean sea level (see page 2 for explanation of symbols), 4^ {5; Depth Water .et change since W _ell Location Symbol , of well Level Last month Last year "'i' F (feet) (feet) (feet) Jameco aquifer (artesian) N 35 2/Port Washington R-IID* 387 6.7 -0.1 +0.5 R-LD 6.6 .0 + .6 Magothy aquifer (artesian) .<h<*. 11N2790 Bay Park R-MD* 560 3.3 - .1 - .4 3RfI. Cedarhurst (salty) R-IIT* 533 -4.3 + .1 + .5 _ N3867 Green Acres R-HT* 517 -2.5 - + .3 2 N7161 Rockville Centre R-ND* 673 5.5 + .4 + .3 N7493 Elmont R 353 6.7 + .2 -1.0 521311 Fire Island R-IIT* 723 11.5 - .8 + .4 __ 5S33380 Lake Ronkonkoma R-l1D 850 49.5 + .5 -1.0 ' .:--' Lloyd aquifer (artesian) N7152 Bavville R-HT* 367 11.2 - .6 +1.3 118N46 Kings Point R-HT* 186 4.9 + .6 +1.0 S21091 Fire Island R-HT* 1920 20.7 + .3 .0 S33379 Lake Ronkonkoma R-MD 1300 38.4 + .5 - .4 A-5 Table 2.--Natcr levels in water-table and artesian wells at the end of Search 1975-- continued PiIZ i ,, Depth Water Net change since Tell Location Symbol of well Level Dec. 1974 Last year (feet) (feet) (feet) Upper glacial aquifer (water-cable) FK30 Brooklvn 56 4.0 -0.8 -0.2 01252 J3amaica 60 .1 + .4 +1.2 01663 3/Clendale 133 02124 Aqueduct 32 2.0 + .2 + .8 N1.11 Valley Stream 27 8.6 +1.2 -1.2 T11212 I1l.ocust (rove 185 86.6 + .5 - .6 N1461 1/South Hicksville 86 77.0 + .6 -1.1 N1478 (rcat Neck 55 20.1 - .1 *N1622 Flmont 85 7.4 + .1 -1.i Nl623 Elmont 71 6.3 - .3 -1.7 Sl$311 Lake Ronkonkoma 23 54..6 + .3 - .6 . S37 7 Centereach 64 57.7 .0 -1.7 S613l Upton 125 45.1 +1 . F.8a 6 Southamptorn 37 7.0 +1 . I + .1 SA.6777 Pcconic 66' 4.7 +1.n - .7 534742 Speonk 92 21.8 +1.1 - .1 *� 5?36141 Smitlitown 113 51.6 - .2 -1.( Jameco acutiuer (artesiani) K19 Brooklyn 136 7.8 .0 -.4 012'37 Baislev 220 -3.2 - .5 4H13.82 Woodmere HT* 200 6.2 + .4 +1.5 N3932 Cedarhurst IIT* 176 6.5 + .3 + .6 IT4020- IUodsburg Dock HT* 153 4.6 - .1 + N4213 Green Acres HT* 134 6.3 + .7 +1.1 A-6- Table 2.--Water levels in water-table and artesian wells at the end of March 1975-- continued * -1 *.� LocatioDepth Water N' et change since W-,Iell Location Symboi of -well Level Dec. 1974 Last vear (feet) (feet) (feet) ;Ii I hagothy aquifer (artesian) I Valley Stream 137 12.3 +2.3 -0.2 VIS 5 C arden City 396 58:4 - .2 - .9 l1F30 Seaford 768 17.7 +2.5.3 N25?8 Brookville 282 69.6 -1.1 - N6?35 Fort Vashington 154 25.4 + .5 - .9 143362 Lawrence (salty) HT* 306 3.7 + .3 + .6 13364 Woodmere 11T* 469 4.4 + .1 + .8 1,3365 Oceanside HT* 565 4.0 + .2 - .7 N4150 Freenort I-T* 745 10.5 - .4 +1.3 S6455 Upton 962 39.2 +1.2 - .5 Lloyd aquifer (artesian) l64 Elmhurst 560 - 5.8 + .8 +3.5 0273 Forest Hills 438 -. .6 + .5 +1.5 0293 Flushing 409 - 3.6 ,- .0 0470 Bavside 375 2.1 - .8 -1.1 0543 Rockaway HT* 840 1.9 - .1 + .2 N7 Valley Stream 911 - 3.4 + .7 -8.0 N511 Mill Neck IIT* 330 22.6 - .8 +2.0 N3355. Plainview 1090 31.5 +..9 +1.0 S6434 Upton 1392 33.0 + .6 - - - .5 A-7 -CURRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS MAXIMUM CURRENTS POSITION TIME OIF. VELOcrr MAXIMUM CUIENTS FERENCES RAIlOS Flood fEbb NowI , | . Sloc |i Mi. . Mosi i. DOrec. A'er Direc. A.e. l 0 . Lo t s omum mum Ion age ,an 9ge curvenl [load ebb (i'u. lneloc- lru(el -1.. 8O*C *LI iin . ' . m. o A. m.i deg. knots knws BLOCK ISLAND SOUND X. Won THE RACE, P.j hP-m dudth Ion THE RACE, p.T3 1370 Harbor of Refuge, south entrance--- 41 22 71 30 -2 25 () 0.2 ') 330 0.6 140 1375 Harbor of Refuge, west entrance---- 41 22 71 31 See table 5. 1380 Pond entrance---------------------- 41 23 71 31 -3 20 -3 25J 0.61 0.4 350 1. 185 1.5 1385 2.4 miles SW. of------------------ 41 20 71 31 (5) -0 lo o.2 0.2 260 0.7 090 0.6 1390 4.5 miles SW. of------------------- 41 18 71 33 See table 5. Btock Island 1395 four miles north of--------------- 41 18 71 32 0 0C +0 10 0.2 0.2 285 0.8 075 0.8 1400 Sandy Pt., 2.1 miles NNE. of------- 41 16 71 34 -0 10 -0 50 0.4 0.5 2?5 1.0 065 1.7 1405 Sandy Pt., 1.5 miles north of------ 41 15 71 34 -0 40 -0 40 0.6 0.5 315 1.9 065 2.1 1410 Clay Head, 1.2 miles ENE. of------- 41 13 71 32 (i) -1 15 0.2 0.1 300 0.7 165 0.5 1415 Old Harbor Pt., 0.5 mile SE. of---- 41 09 71 32 -0 20 -0 10 0.1 0.1 335 0.2 175 0.6 1420 Lewis Pt., 1.0 mile SW. of--------- 41 08 71 37 (7) -1 10 0.7 0.5 300 1.9 135 1.8 1425 Lewis Pt., 1.5 miles west of------- 43 09 71 38 -1 10 -1 05 0.4 0.4 320 1.4 170 1.7 1430 Great Salt Pond entrance----------- 41 12 71 36 -3 55 -4 00 0.1 0.1 165 0.3 325 0.3 1435 Great Salt Pond ent.,l mile NW. of- 41 12 71 36 -1 20 -0 45 0.1 0.1 160 0.4 035 0.4 1440 Sandy Pt., 0.4 mile west of-------- 41 14 71 35 ----- '-1 301 () 0.2 ---- ---- 010 0.7 ...tCurraPt tro uW-oI Ad -r i .hl +, I Fr S,.. "A{ I'm rA double ebb occurs at this station (see note b). Time differences: first ebb, -4h 0C: minimum ebb, -2h 40-; second ebb, -1l 55"; maximum flood, -2Z 50'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.2; min- imum ebb, 0.1: second ebb, 0.2. SFlood begins, -0A 50=; ebb begins, +0' 20'. 'Ebb begins, -40' 35'; minimum between ebb and flood, -2 20" with velocity of approximately 0.5 knots at 220' true. ?Flood begins, -1l 35'; ebb begins, -Oa 35'. 'Flood velocity is too weak to be predicted. Time difference gives mid-point of four hour stand of weak and variable current and time of maximum ebb. 'A double flood occurs at this station; the ebb is regular. After flood begins the velocity in- creases to a maximum (called "first flood"); it then decreases, reaching a minimum (cilled "minimum flood") near the middle of the flood period and at some places may actually run In an ebb direction for a short period at this time; It then again floods with a stronger velocity (called "second flood") after which It decreases to the slack before ebb. Differences and ratios given for first, minimum, and second floods should be applied to the time and velocity of maximum flood at the reference station. Other values should be applied to the corresponding phases at the reference station. &A double ebo occurs at this station. A similar slackening occurs during the ebb period as is de- scribed for the flood period in "footnote ". Differences and ratios given for first, minimum, and second ebbs should be applied tq the time and velocity of maximum ebb at the reference station. Other values should be applied to the corresponding phases at the reference station. B-1 -CURRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS TIME DIF. VELOCI AIIM CURRENTS FERENCES RATIOS curedflood Ebb ruJ loc (ruJ elo Lot. Lon. Stck mve M.. floe "D. age b. age -u~elseC. flood ebb jt1c.0 ~eIoc- itryal .410C. B. O t. m, A. . deg. knots deg. knot BLOGX 1ILAND SOUO--Continued XN. W. on TIE RACE, p.34 rlte Eertdlan. 75'Y. 1445 Green Hill Pt., 1.1 miles 5. of------ 41 21 71 36 -O 50 -O 50 0.2 0.1 250 0.6 070 0.4 1450 Sandy Pt., 4.1 miles iW. of------ - 41 17 71 38 +0 10 +0 1Oj 0.2 0.2 270 0.7 085 0.6 1455 Grace Pt., 2.0 miles NW. of .--------- 41 12 71 38 See table 5. 1460 quonochontaug Beach, 1.1 miles S. of-- 41 19 71 43 (1) -0 05 0.4 0.1 250 1.1 080 0.4 1465 Quonochontaug Beach, 3.8 miles S. of-- 41 16 71 43 +0 10 0 00 0.2 0.2 245 0.7 060 0.6 1470 Lewis Point, 6.0 miles WI. of-------- 41 12 71 44 (2) +0 40 0.2 0.3 285 0.6 095 1.2 -1475 Southwest Ledge -----� -- ------ �----- 41 07 71 42 -O 20 -O'20 0.5 0.5 320 1.5 140 2.1 1480 Southwest Ledge, 2.0 miles W. of------ 41 07 71 43 0 00 -0 15 0.5 0.5 355 1.5 170 1.S 1485 Watch Hill Pt., 2.2 miles E. of ------ 4118 71 49 (3) -0 15 0.4 0.2 260 1.2 085 0.7 1490 Watch Hill Pt., 5.2 miles SSE. of ----- 41 13 71 49 +0 30 +O 15 0.4 0.3 265 1.2 C65 1.2 "1495 Mantauk Pt., 5.4, miles NNE. of-------- 41 10 71 50 ('] O 00 0.4 0.5 280 1.1 080 1.6 1500 Wontauk Pt., 1.2 miles E, of---------- 41 04 71 50 -1 10 -1 30 1.0 0.8 345 2.8 160 2.8 1505 Fentauk Pt., 1 mile NE. of ---------- 41 05 71 51 -1 35 -1 35 0.7 0.4 355 2.4 145 1.9 1510 Wicopesset Island, 1.1 miles SSE. of-- 41 16 71 55 (Cs) -O010 0.5 O.2 250 1.5 075 0.8 1515 East Pt., Fishers I., 4.1 miles S. of- 41 13 71 56 +0 25 +0 20 0.3 0.5 235 0.9 075 1.8 1520 Cerberus Shoal, 1.5 miles East of ----- 41 10 71 55 -O 30 -0 35 0.4 0.5 255 1.1 090 1.8 1525 Between Shagwqng Reef & Cerberus Shoal 41 08 71 56 -O 35 -0.50 0.6 0.5 240 1.9 055 1.8 1530 Mantauk Harbor entrance--- --- ---- 41 05 71 56 -2 50 (6) 0.4 (') 225 1.2 015---- 1535 Mt. Prospect, 0.6 mile SSE. of -------- 41 15 72 00 -0 20 (7) 0.6 0.5 275 1.7 055 1.6 1540 Between Cerberus Shoal and Fishers I-- 41 13 71 58 -O 25 -O 05 0.4 0.3. 265 1.3 095 1.3 1545 Little Gull Island, 5.7 miles ESE. of- 41 1 72 02 See table 5. 1550 Gardlners Island, 3 miles HE. of ------ 41 08 72 02 -O 35 -O '40 0.3 0.2 305 0.9 140 1.0 1553 Eastern Plain Pt., 1.2 miles H. of---- 41 07 72 05 (D) -2 05 0.3 0.2 290 1.0 110 0.8 1555 Eastern Plain Pt., 3.9 miles ERIE. of-- 41 07 72 00 -O 50 -1 15 0.3 0.3 245 1.0 095 1.0 1560 Little Gull Island, 0.8 mile SSE. of-- 41 12 72 06 (') (1) 0.4 (C) 330 1.3 ---- ---- 1563 Rocky Point, 1.8 miles NW. of -------- 41 03 72 02 -1 45 -120 0.1 0.1 265 0.2 065 0.2 GARCIIERS BAY, etc. 1565 Goff Point, 0.4 mile NW. of ---------- 41 01 72 04 -1 45 -2 30 0.4 0.5 225 1.2 010 1.6 1566 Acabonack Hbr. ent., 0.6 mile ESE. of- 41 01 72 07 -1 Z0 -2 20 0.5 0.3 345 1.4 140 1.2 1570 Hag Creek Point, north of ------------- 41 04 72 10 -1 20 -1 20 0.1 0.1 280 0.3 065 0.5 '1571 Ram Island, 2.2 miles E. of -------- 41 05 72 14 -0 25 -0 20 0.1 0.1 250 0.2 090O 0.3 1573 O-rint Point, 2.4 miles SSE. of ------- 4 08 72 12 (0) -O 30 0.1 0.1 250 0.4 025 0.3 1575 Gardiners Pt. Ruins, 1.1 miles N. of-- 41 10 72 09 -O 20 -0 10 0.4 0.5 270 1.2 065 1.8 1580 Between Gardiners Point & Plum Island- 41 10 72 10 -O 30 0 00 0.4 0.2 255 1.4 080 0.9 1583 Ram Island, 1.4 mile N:JE. of ---------- 41 06 72 16 -O 05 +0 10 0.1 '0.2 240 0.4 075 0.6 1585 Hay Beach Point, 0.3 mile NW. of------ 41 07 72 20 +O Z0 ('1 0.5 {11) 210 1.5 025 C() 'Flood begins, -0h 50'; ebb begins, 40" 35'. 'Flood begins, +0" 50'; ebb begins, +0" 051. JFlood begins, -01 356; ebb begins, 40' 35'. iFlood begins. 40' 25'; ebb begins, -0a 45'. 'Flcod begins, -Ih 001; ebb begins, +06 401. 4A double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time ditferencesi fIrst ebb -4A 501; minimum ebb, -2h'301; second ebb, -0" 45'; maximum flood, -2. 45'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.2; min- Imumn ebb, O.1; second ebb. 0.2. 'Maximum flood, -0' 05'; maximum ebb, -1' 00. 4FIood begins, -2" 55"; ebb begins, -1a 201. *Flood begins, -2- 20'; ebb begins, -0" 35'. A double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time differences: first ebb, -3' 00"; minimum ebb, -IA 55'; second ebb, -a0' 30': maximum flood, -0a 50". Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.2: second ebb, 0.2. Minimum ebb is extremely weak, possibly flooding for a short period. ?"Flood begins, +0" 1IO; ebb begins, +1h 00O. "Every other ebb phase exhibits a double ebb pattern (see note ). Time differences: first ebb, -0, 501; minimum ebb, +40 40"; second ebb, +1" 35-'; maximum flood, +0h O 0h . For single ebb phases use time differences and velocity ratios of the first ebb. Velocity ratios: first ebb, 0.3;; minimum ebb, 0.1; second ebb, 0.2, ' A double ebb occurs at this station. A similar slackening occurs during the ebb period as Is do- Scribed lor the flood period In "footnote -, pajgn 140". Differences and ratios given for first, min- Imum, and second ebbs should be applied to the time and velocity of maximum ebb at the reference sta- tion. Other values should be applied to the corresponding phases at the reference station. B-2 - ;URRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS POgIION TIME OIF. v T MAXIMUM CUVEOCRRENTS FERENCES RLTIOS flod Ebb �No. KACE | Sisk*,i. S a.oi- 0 .... Ac.... Olec- A ...c let. lo9. Sc mum mum mum lIrn oga Ilon o0a rcuIrol flood Ibb Iruei teloc- Iru.) .ioc- ily ity iV m. Ih. "m deg. knolt deg. Cne,, GARDINERS BAY, etc.-Continued i. W. aon THE RACE, p.34 Ttme merldian, 75W'Y.. 1587 Jennings Point, 0.2 mile NNW. of ------ 41 04 72 22 40 25 +0 05 0.6 0.4 290 1.6 055 1.5 1590 Cedar Point, 0.2 mile west of--------- 41 02 72 16 000 -0 30 0.6 0.5 195 1.5 005 1.6 1592 North Haven Peninsula, north of------- 41 02 72 19 +0 15 -O 30 0.8 0.6 230 2.4 035 2.1 1593 Paradise RPint, 0.4 mile east of----- 41 03 72 23 +0 25 +t 05 0.5 0.4 145 1.5 345 1.5 1595 Little Peconic Bay entrance---------- 41 02 72 23 +0 35 +0 10 0.6 0,4 240 1.6 015 1.5 1600 Robins Island, 0.5 mile south of----- 40 57 72 27 +0 35 +0 10 0.6 0.2 245 1.7 065 0.6 FISHERS ISLAND SOUND 1605 Edwards Pt.-Sandy Pt. (between)------- 41 20 71 54 -2 30 (1) 0.4 (1) 035 1.1 235 --_ 1610 Napatree Point, 0.7 mile SW. of------- 41 18 71 54 -O 55 -1 10 0.6 0.6 285 1.7 115 2.2 1620 Little Narragansett Say entrance------ 41 20 71 53 -2 00 -2 15 0.4 0.3 090 1.3 270 1.3 1625 Avondale, Pawcatuck River------------- 41 20 71 51 -2 05 (2) 0.2 (2) 060 0.6 255 ---- 1630 Ram Island Reef, south of------------- 41 18 71 58 -O 45 -O 50 0.4 0.4 255 1.3 090 1.6 1635 Noank �-------------------------------- 41 19 71 59 (3) (3) 0.2 (3) 340 0.5 -------- 1640 Mystic, Highway Bridge, Mystic River-- 41 21 71 58 -2 05 (4) 0.2 (') 040 0.5 230 --- 1645 Clay Point, 1.3 miles NNE. of------- 41 18 71 58 -0 40 -1 00 0.5 0.5 265 1.4 035 1.9 1650 North Hill Pt., 1.1 miles NNW. of----- 41 18 72 02 (S) (5) 0.5 0.4 260 1.5 080 1.2 LONG ISLAND SOUND The Race 1655 Race Point, 0.4 mile SW. of-------- 41 15 72 03 -0 35 -0 40 0.9 1.0 290 2.6 135 3.5 1660 THE RACE, near Valiant Rock-------- 41 14 72 04 Oaily predictions 295 2,9 100 3,5 1665 0.5 mile NE. of Little Gull Island- 41 13 72 06 -O 20 -O 20 1.0 0.7 000 3.3 105 3.1 1670 Little Gull I., 1.1 mi. ENE. of---- 41 13 72 05 -0 05 -0 30 1.4 1.3 300 4.0 130 4.7 1675 Great Gull Island, 0.7 mile WSW. of--- 41 12 72 08 -O 40 () 0.9 0.9 300 2.6 135 3.2 1680 Plum Gut---------------------------- 41 10 72 13 -110 -1 50 1.2 1.2 325 3.5 125 4.3 1685 Eastern Point, 1.5 miles south of----- 41 18 72 05 -1 30 -1 50 0.1 0.1 250 0.4 055 0.4 1690 New London Harbor entrance------------ 41 19 72 05 -1 45 -1 35 0.1 0.1 350 0.1 210 0.2 Thames Rtuer 1695 Winthrop Point -------------------- 41 22 72 05 -1 05 (') 0.1 (7) 010 0.4 185 ---- 1700 Off Smith Cove ------------------- 41 24 72 05 -1 25 (1) 0.2 (') 020 0.7 200 --- 1705 Off Stoddard Hill------------------ 41 28 72 04 -1 00 (0) 0.2 (') 330 0.7 165 --- 1710 Lower Coal Oock------------------ 41 31 72 05 cC.rrnt too . ..h .nd r-ri.bl. to bh pr.diet.d. IA double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time differences: first ebb, -3h 40'; minimum ebb, -1b 30'; second ebb, -0h 05; maximum flood, -3" 15'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.3; min- imum ebb, 0.1; second ebb, 0.2. 1A double ebb occurs at this station (see note '1. Time differences: first ebb,-3" 40'; minimum ebb, -1h 10'; second ebb, +Oh 05'; maximum flood, -2' 40'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.2; second ebb, 0.1. Minimum ebb is extremely weak, possibly flooding for a short period. 'Flood begins, -1 35'; ebb begins, -4h C10. A double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time differences: first ebb, -4h 30'; minimum ebb, -1' 25'; second ebb, +0h 20'; maximum flood, -35 15' Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.1; second ebb, 0.1. Minimum ebb is extremely weak, possibly flooding for a short period. 4A double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time differences: first ebb, .3h 40=; minimum ebb, -1' 40'; second ebb, -0o 20'; maximum flood, -2h 50'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.1; second ebb, 0.1. Minimum ebb is weak. 'Flood begins, -1' 05-; maximum flood, -h0 25'; ebb begins, -Oh 20-; maximum ebb, -li 35'. 'Maximum flood, -Oh 35'; maximum ebb, -1' 40'. VA double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time differences: first ebb, -2h 35*; minimum ebb, -1b 10; second ebb, +04 05'; maximum flood, -2' 00'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.1; second ebb, 0.1. Minimum ebb is weak. 'A double ebb occurs at this station (see note '). Time differences: first ebb, -1' 55S; minimum ebb, -1a 30=; second ebb, o40 15'; maximum flood, -2' 20'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.2; min- imum ebb, 0.1; second ebb, 0.2. 'A double ebb occurs at this station (see note *). Time differences: first ebb, -2h 30-; minimum ebb, -1l 10=; second ebb, +0* 25'; maximum flood, -2' 25'. Velocity ratio for first ebb is 0.1; second ebb, 0.2. Minimum ebb is weak. 'A double ebb occurs at this station. A similar slackening occurs during the ebb period as Is de- scribed for the flood period in "footnote ', page 140". Oifferences and ratios given for first, mi,- lmum, and second ebbs should be applied to the time and velocity of maximum ebb at the reference sta-\ tion. Other values should be applied to the corresponding phases at the referenc. station; B-3 -CURRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS MAXIMUM CURRENTS POSTIN�IME D IF. VELOCITY .rU4 ' '- �~QS~1 FERENCES aTrIOS max; MaOi. MOi- Dilev- A'er- ODec. A'e,- a. I mm mum. mum 0.. . age hoe age tet e curra! flood ebb (rtu) veloc.- [lueJ el-: _iy iti - - *'* i. -n. i. t deg. knots deg. knots LONG ISLAND SOUND-Continued" I. W. on THE RACE, P.34 rtae meridian, 75�V. 15 Goshen Point, 1.9 miles SSE. of------- 41 16 72 06 -1 05 -1 25 0.4 0.5 285 1.2 060 1.6 l;20 Little Gull Island, 0.8 mile NNW. of-- 41 13 72 07 () -1 00 0.7 0.8 260 1.9 045 2.9 1.25 Bartlett Reef, 0.2 mi le south of------ 41 16 72 08 -1 30 -1 10 0.3 0.3 255 1.4 090 1.3 1730 Twotree Island Channel -------- 41 1 72 08 -0 55 -1 35 0.4 0.4 265 1.2 100 1.6 11735 Nlantic (Railroad Bridge) ------ 41 20 72 11 -0 55 -0 50 0.6 0.2 350 1.6 .180 0.8 .1140 Black Point, 0.8 mile south of-------- 41 17 72 12 -1 25 -1 40 0.5 0.4 265 1.4 080 1.3 1745 Black Point-Plum Island (between)--- 41 14 72 12 +0 25 + 15 0.7 0.7 235 2.1 075 2.4 -1150 Plum Island, 0.8 mile NNW. of------- 41 12 72 12 (2) -0 30 0.6 0.7 245 1.7 065 2.4 1753 Hatchett Point, 1.1 miles WSW. of----- 41 16 72 17 0.4 0.3 240 1.3 045 1.2 Connectleut Rtuer 1755 Lynde Point, channel east of------ 41 16 72 20 +030 +0 40 0.3 .0.2 345 0.9 160 0.7 1157 Saybrook Point, 0.2 mile NE. of--- 41 17 72 21 +0 40 +0 40 0.5 0.4 355 1.5 160 1.5 1760 -Railroad drawbridge---------------- 41 19 72 21 +0 50 +1 00 0.5 0.5 000 1.6 180 2.1 1765 Eustasia Island, 0.6 mile ESE. of-- 41 23 72 24 +1 40 +1 30 0.4 0.4 290 1.1 070 1.4 4767 Eddy Rock Shoal, west of---------- 41 27 72 28 +1 50 +1 50 0.3 0.2 350 0.3 155 0.6 1769 Higganum Creek, 0.5 mile ESE. of--- 41.30 72 33 +2 50 +2'55 0.3 0.3 270 0.8 080 1.0 1770 Wilcox Island Park, east of-------- 41 34 72 39 (4) +3 35 0.3 0.3 355 0.9 160 1.0 1773 . Rocky Hill --------� ------------ 41 40 72 38 Cs) +3 35 0.2 0.2 335 0.6 135 0.8 -1175 Hartford Jetty---------------- 41 45 72 39 ( C) +4 35 C) 0.2 290 0.1 095 0.7 .1777 Saybrook Breakwater, 1.5 miles SE. of- 41 14 72 19 -1 10 -1 35 0.7 0.6 260 1.9 070 2.0 1750 Mulford Point, 3.1 miles FN1. of------- 41 12 72 19 -0 05 (?) 0,7 0.6 270 1.9 065 2.3 1733 Orient Point, 1.0 mile WNW, of-------- 41 10 72 15 -0 50 (3) (') 0.9 250 ---- 055 3.1 1785 Terry Point, 1 mile north of -------- 41 10 72 19 -0 05 -0 10 0.8 0.7 255 2.7 070 3.2 1767 Cornfield Point, 3 miles south of---- 41 13 72 22 -0 30 -0 20 0.6 0.4 255 2.0 095 1.7 1790 Cornfield Point, 1 mile south of------ 41 15 72 23 -1 25 -150 0.5 0.4 270 1.6 100 1.8 1793 Kelsey Point, 2.1 miles SE. of- -_---- 41 14 72 25 -0 45 -1 00 0.5 0.5 260 1.5 070 1.8 1795 Six Mile Reef, 1.5 miles north of----- 41 13 72 29 -0 20 -0 25 0.3 0.4 290 1.0 095 1.3 1797 Six Mile Reef, 2 miles east of -------- 41 11 72 27 -0 20 -0 25 0.6 0.6 235 1.6 040 2.1 1799 Horton Point, 1.4 miles NNW. of------- 41 06 72 27 0 00 -0 05 0.5 0.6 260 1.4 040 2.0 2800 Kelsey Point, 1 mile south of--------- 41 14 72 30 -1 15 -1 25 0.6 0.3 250 2.0 120 1.5 1805 Sachem Head, 1.0 mile SSE. of--------- 41 14 72 42 -0 35 -0 50 0.4 0.3 255 1.1 065 1.0 1810 Sachem Head, 6.2 miles south of------ 41 09 72 42 +0 10 0 10 0.2 0.3 260 0.6 065 0.9 1812 Roanoke Point, 5.6 miles north of----- 41 04 72 43 -0 10 -0 15 0.2 0.3 255 0.7 050 0.9 1814 Roanoke Point, 2.3 miles NNW. of------ 41 01 72 43 (9) -0 25 0.3 0.2 270 0.9 070 0.7 1&15 Sachem Head, 1 mile south of ---------- 41 14 72 43 -O 40 -0 15 0.3 0.3 280 0.9 085 1.2 1820 New Haven Harbor entrance" ----------- 414 72 55 -0 55 -1 25 0.4 0.2 320 1.4 150 0.9 1822 City Point, 1.3 miles NE. of---------- 41 18 72 54 +0 20 +0 20 0.1 0.1 015 0.3 215 0.4 1823 Oyster River Pt., 1.3 miles SSE. of--- 41 13 72 58 C") -0 30 0.1 0.1 255 0.3 060 0.3 1-25 Pond Point, 4.2 miles SSE. of--------- 41 09 72 58 -0 10 -0 05 0.2 0.2 265 0.6 065 0.6 1 26 Stratford Shoal, 6.0 miles east of---- 41 05 72 58 -0 05 -0 05 0.2 0.2 265 0.6 060 0.6 1527 Sound Beach, 2.2 miles north of------- 41 00 72 58 -0 10 -0 15 0.3 0.3 270 0.9 075 0.9 1828 Charles Island, 0.8 mile SSE. of----- 41 11 73 03 -0 40 -0 45 0.1 0.1 250 0.4 070 0.4 'Flood begins, +40 15"; ebb begins, -2* 30'. 'Flood begins, +40 05'; ebb begins, -1a 15'. 'Flood begins, -2" 35'; maximum flood, -1h 10'; ebb begins, -0h 50-; maximum ebb, -2" 35a. -'Flood begins, +4 05'; ebb begins, +3h 05'. 'Flood begins, +4* 40'; ebb begins, +3" 20'. 'Flood begins, +5" 45'; ebb begins, +3" 0CO; maximum flood current is weak and variable. 'Maximum flood, -1b 05'; maximum ebb, -0" 25-. 'A double flood occurs at this station (see note 6 on page 139). Time differences: first flood, -24 00O; minimum flood, -1* 00'; second flood, -0 10-; maximum ebb, -1l 15-. Velocity ratios: first Ilood, 0.5; minimum flood, 0.3; second flood, 0.7. 'Flood begins, -1" X0'; ebb begins, -0^" 10-. "Insidoe breakwaters. In channel, the current is only 0.4 knot. '"Slacks are indefinite. B3-4 -CURRENT DIFFERENCES AND O1IHR (.LNSIANIM MAXIMUM CURRENTS TIME DIFF VElOCItY TEIOENCES RATIOS Flood Ebb Nt rPLACE MaxJ-� Mo... Moxi- O,,ec, A",*'. Direo- Avf. L tes , Stock mum mum mum h gon oge I,*" ag. C urr.en flood ebb Itle) .eloc. lIrue) e*I.c- 't� ily . hm. h. m. deg. knot, drg. kmeo LONG ISLAIND SOUND--Continued 1. W. on THE RACE, p..31 flae meridian, 751Y. Iousatonlo River 18530 Milford Point, 0.2 mile west of---- 41 10 73 07 +O 05 . (') 0.4 0.3 330 1.2 135 1.2 1835 R ailroad drawbridge, above--------- 41 13 73 07 +0 30 (2) 0.4 0.4 350 1.1 185 1.3 1837 Fowler Isand, 0.1 mile NNW. of---- 41 14 73 06 +0 40 +0 30 0.4 0.3 040 1.1 270 1.1 1840 Wooster Island, 0.1 mile SW. of---- 41 17 73 05 (3) +0 30 0.2 0.2 020 0.8 220 0.7 1845 Derby-Shelton Bridge, below-------- 41 19 73 05 ----- ----- ---- 0.1 (4) (4) 095 0.4 1850 Point No Point, 1.2 miles south of ---- 41 08 73 08 -0 10 -0 20 0.4 0.3 255 1.3 095 1.3 1855 Old Field Point, 2 miles NE. of ------- 41 00 73 06 +0 05 +0 10 0.2 0.2 250 0.8 100 0.9 1860 Port Jefferson Harbor entrance ------ 40 58 73 06 +0 20 '+0 25 0.8 0.4 150 2.6 325 1.9 1865 Crane Neck Point, 0.5 mile NW. of ----- 40 58 73 10 -1 10 -1 30 0.4 0.3 255 1.3 015 1.5 1870 Bridgeport Hbr.ent., betwaeen jetties' 41 09 73 11 O 00 -O 10 0.2 0.1 340 0.7 175 0.6 1875 Pine Creek Pt., 2.3 miles SE. of------ 41 05 73 14 (') -0 15 0.3 0.1 265 0.8 060 0.5 1880 Saugatuck R., 0.5 mile above Bluff Pt- 41 06 73 23 c,,r.nt ,.. .,. ,.,hi.l.. 1885 Shoffield I. Tower, 1.1 miles SE. of-- 41 02 73 24 +0 45 +0 15) 0.3) 0.21 2651 1.0 075 0.6 1890 Sheffield Island Harbor--------------- 41 03 73 26 Cur,,.nt .,. end ,ri,,.bl.. 1895 Norwalk River, off Gregory Point------ 41 05 73 24 -0 10 -0 15 0.2 0.1 320 0.7 145 0.6 1900 Eatons Neck Pt., 0.5 mile north of---- 40 58 73 24 -1 10 -0 30 .0.2 0.3 310 0.6 070 1.4 1905 Eatons Neck Pt., 1.8 miles west of---- 40 57 73 26 -0 50 -0 45 0.2 0.1 200 0.5 070 0.6 1910 Huntington Bay, off East Fort Point--- 40 56 73 25 +0 30 +0 35 0.1 0.1 180 0.4 020 0.6 1915 Northport Bay entrance (in channel)--- 40 55 73 24 -0 05 +0 10 0.3 0.4 080 1.1 250 1.8 1920 Northport Bay, south of Duck I. Bluff- 40 55 73 23 +0 20 +0 25 0.1 0.1 005 0.4 285 0.3 1925 Long Neck Point, 0.6 mile south of ---- 41 02 73 29 (7) -0 10 0.3 0.2 245 0.8 050 0.6 1930 Lloyd Point, 0.8 mile north of-------- 40 58 73 29 -0 10 -0 15 0.4 0.3 280 1.3 065 1.4 1935 Shippan Point, 1.3 miles SSE. of ------ 41 00 73 31 +O 40 -O 15 0.3 0.3 245 1.0 085 0.9 Os ter Bal, 1940 Channel off West Fort-------------- 40 55 73 30 +0 05 .4015 0.2 0.1 120 0.5 320 0.6 1945 Harbor ent., S. of Plum Point------ 40 54 73 31 000 +0 05 0.2 0.2 245 0.7 055 0.7 1950 Harbor, west of Sooer Point ------- 40 53 73 32 +0 15 +0 25 0.2 0.1 335 0.6 140 0.4 1955 Cold Spring Harbor- . ..... 40 53 73 29 Curr.nt ...k n..d ern.bl. 1960 Stamford Harbor- --------------------- 41 02 73 32 Cnt. ..d ...b.. 1965 Captain Harbor entrance--------------- 41 00 73 36 +0 05 - 3.305 0.7 105 0.8 1970 Cos Cob Harbor, off Goose Island------ 41 01 73 36 +0 10 -O 2 0.5 190 0.4 1975 Peningo Neck, 0.2 mi. off Parsonage Pt 40 57 73 41 +0 35 +0 0 0 01 210 0.5 050 0.5 1980 Matinecock Point (midsound) ----------- 40 56 73 39 +0 55 +0 50 02 02 25 5 0.5 050 0.7 1985 M3tinecock Point, 0.5 mile north of--- 40 55 73 38 +0 30 + 0 .2 0.2 260 0.7 055 0.9 1990 Hempstead Harbor, off Mott Point------ 40 52 73 40 c,,.t ,,.kend -,!,.bI.. 1995 Hempstead Harbor, east of Bar Beach--- 40 50 73 39 0 0 -0 101 0.5s 0.41 i70) 1.5 350 1.9 2000 ismaroneck Harbor, off Shootfly I ----- 40 56 73 43. Cu,. .,.& , ,ib/.. 2005 Echo Bay entrance ---------- .------- 40 54 73 46 Cur.-nt .,.A -d ,r.el*b.. 2010 Davids Island, channel north of ------- 40 53 73 46 +1 05 +0 40 0.11 0.11 2301 0.4 050 0.6 2015 Davids Island, channel O.1 mi. E. of-- 40 53 73 46 C.....e ...k..d ...i.bl.. 2020 Execution Rocks, southeast of--------- 40 52 73 44 +1 20 +0 55 0.2 0.2 225 0.5 025 0.7 .o025~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 0.2 t. 2025 Manhasset Bay entrance --------------- 40 51 73 44 -O 05 -0 15 0.2 0.1 140 0.5 335 0.4 2030 Hart Island, southeast of ------------- 40 51 73 46 +2 30 +3 25 0.1 0.2 200 0.4 020 0.8 2035 Between Hart Island and City Island--- 40 51 73 47 +3 10 +3 10 0.2 0.2 IS 0.5 355 0.7 2040 City Island Bridge-------------------- 40 51 73 48 c.,...t...iebl...,. IAt. . 2045 Eastchester Bay, near Big Tom --------- 40 50 73 48 +0 30 -O 10 0.2) 0.1 04 2050 Hutchinson R., Pelham Highway Bridge-- 40 52 73 49 -O 30 -O 50 0.5 0.51 3 31 1.7 135 1.1 2055 Little Neck Bay entrance-------------- 40 48 75 46 -O 15 +0 151 0.11 ..1135 0.3 335 0.3 :Maximum flood, Oh 00'; maximum ebb, -O0 55-. 'Maximum flood, +0n 15=; maximum ebb, -0h 55=. �Flood begins, +1i 20-; ebb begins, +06 201. 'Current seldom floods. SNear Tongue Point, Bridgeport Harbor, the current is weak and Irregular. 'Flood begins, -Oh 30C; ebb begins, 4C 45=. tFlood begins, -0h 55-; ebb begins, K)h 55-. 'Current variable, running over )J knots at times. MaxImum north and south currents occur about : hour before maximum flood end ebb, respectively, at The Race. B-5 .CURRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS MAXIMUM CURREI'm TIME 0IF. VELOCITYM FERENCES RATIOS '~N M Aa Food Ebb � iM Maxi. M.i.- Maoi. O.eec- Aver- Direc- Aver- - Lot. Lo..g mw, g.w. ,cSm lo. age liar age .ateri uyntm mum mum non aga . urrnt flood ebb lruel reloc. (lrueJ aloec ib ith -*- ' * ' h m. | m. de. knots deg. knots EAST RIVER it. W. on HELL GATE, P.'O Tine xeridfan. 75'I. 2060 Between Willets Point and Throgs Neck- 40 48 73 47 -0 50 -1 15 0.3 0.1 050 1.0 250 0.6 2065 Cryders Point, 0.4 mile NNW. of ------ 40 48 73 48 -0 30 -- 50 0.4 0.2 110 1.3 285 1.1 2070 Old Ferry Point------------------ 40 48 73 50 -0 40 -0 35 0.5 0.3 075 1.7 240 1.5 2075 Clason Point, 0.2 mile SSW. of------ 40 48 73 51 -0 10 -0 40 0.5 0.3 070 1.8 250 1.5 2080 Flushing Creek entrance -------------- 40 46 73 51 Cur.-n ... -*nd ,.rlabl. 2085 Rikers I. chan., off La Guardia Field- 40 47 7353 +0 05 -0 05 0.31 0.31 0901 1.1 2650 1.3 2090 Bronx River (1 mile N. of Hunts Pt)--- 40 49 73 52 Crr ...x,,r .nd ..rbl-. 2095 Hunts Point, southwest of------------- 408 A3 53 0O0 -0 05 0.5 0.3 110 1.7 280 1.3 2100 Between N. Brother I. and S. Brother 1 40 48 73 54 +0 15 'O 00 0.7 0.4 065 2.5 255 1.8 2105 Port Morris, channel off of------- 40 48 73 54 +0 05 -0 15 0.4 0.4 -045 1.5 220 1.7 2110 Off Winthrop Ave., Astoria------------ 4 47 73 55 O 00 -0 05 1.0 0.5 040 3.4 220 2.5 2115 i1ill Rock, northeast of --. ------- 40 47 73 56 -O 25 -O 15 0.7 0.1 105 2.3 290 0.6 2120 Mill Rock, west of ------------------ 40 47 73 56 -0 15 - 05 0.4 0.2 000 1.2 180 1.0 2125 HELL GATE (off Mill Rock) ------ 40'47 73 56 Oaily predictions 050 3.4 230 4.6 2130 Welfare Island, west of, off 75th St-- 40 46 73 57 -0 05 O 00 1.1 1.0 035 3.8 215 4.7 2135 Welfare Island, east of, off 36th Ave- 40 46 73 57 -010 -0 05 1.0 0.7 030 3.5 210 3.4 2136 Welfare Island, west of, off 67th St-- 40 46 73 57 +0 10 000 1.1 0.9 010 3.6 230 4.0 2137 Welfare Island, west of, off 63rd St-- 40 46 73 57 -O 05 CO 0.8 0.6 035 2.8 225 2.9 2138 Welfare Island, east of ------------- 40 45 73 57 0 00 0 00 0.8 0.6 030 2.8 200 2.6 2140 Off 31st Street, Manhattan-- ------ 40 44 73.58 0 05 0 10 0.4 0.5 000 .1.5 175 2.1 2145 Newtown Creek entrance ------------- 10 44 73 57 C- rrent .4k end .rible. 2150 Off 19th Street (Pier 67) ----------- 40 44 73 58 -010 +0 05 0.5 0.4 355 1.8 180 1.9 2155 Williamsburg Bridge, 0.3 mile N. of--- 40 43 73 58 -O 05 +4 10 0.8 0.6 020 2.7 220 2.9 2160 Corlears Hook, south of, midstreamt--- 40 43 73 59 - 10 0 00 0.9 0.7 060 3.0 235 3.0 2165 Brooklyn Bridge, 0.1 mile SW. of----- 40 42 74 00 -O 10 0 00 0.9 0.8 045 2.9 220 3.5 2170 Governors I., N. of (sr5 CAUTION Tor8--- 40 42 74 01 -0 20 +0 15 0.4 0.4 095 1.2 270 1.7 2175 Buttermilk Channel ------------------ 40 41 74 01 -0 0 0 00 0.5 0.5 050 1.8 220 2.4 HARLEM RIVER 21ao Little Hell Gate, western end ----- 40 47 73 56 -0 25 0 05 0.9 0.6 100 2.9 300 2.7 2185 East 105th Street--------------------- 40 47 73 56 -O 10 -0 05 0.4 0.2 035 1.2 215 1.0 2190 East 117th Street (midchannel)-------- 40 48 73 56 -O 30 40 10 0.4 ---- 195 1.3 ---- ---- 2195 Willis Ave. Bridge, 0.1 mile NW. of--- 40 48 73 56 -O 20 -O 05 0.4 0.3 140 1.2 330 1.3 2200 Madison Ave. Eride -------------.---- 40 49 73 56 -0 20 0 00 0.5 0.4 160 1.8 000 1.7 2205 Macombs Oam Bridge------------------- 40 50 73 56 -0 20 000 0.5 0.3 180 1.7 000 1.4 2210 High Bridge ------------------------- 40 51 73 56 -O 20 0 00 0.6 0.4 190 2.0 015 2.0 2215 West 207th Street Bridge------------- 40 52 73 55 -O 20 0 00 0.6 0.4 215 2.0 035 2.0 2220 Broadway Bridge----------------------- 40 52 73 55 -O 20 +0 05 0.6 0.5 115 2.1 300 2.3 2225 Spuyteri Duyvil Creek entrance-------- 40 53 73 56 -O 10 0 15 0.4 0.3 100 1.4 285 1.5 LONG ISLAND, Soutb Coast on THE NARROWS, p.46 2230 Fire Island Lighted Whistle Buoy 2FI-- 40 29 73 11 See table 5. 2235 Fire Island Inlet, 22 miles south of- 40 16 73 16- ---- ---- () 0 (2) 2240 Shinnecock Canal, railroad bridge----- iC 53 72 30 ---- 4010.8 ---- ---- 10 .5 :The current on the bMnhattan side of the channel Is about I ;not stronger and on the Brooklyn side about j knot weaker than at this'station. 'Maximum flood only. The ebb or northerly current is weak and variable. East of the channel the current flows southward practically all the time, but with changing velocity, the maximum velocity being about the same as In midchannel and occurlng about the same time. On the Manhattan side, Just off the piers, the flood or southerly current Is weak and variable but the ebb or northerly current has an average maximum velocity of about 2 knots which occurs about the time of maximum ebb at Hell Gate. 'Tidal current Is weak, averaging about 0.1 knot at maximum. aFor maximum southward current only, the gates of the lock being closed to prevent northward flow. Apply difference and ratio to maximum ebb at The Narrows. CAUTION--Durln. the first 2 hours of flood In channel north of Governors Island the current In Hudson River is still ebblng while during first It hours of ebb In this channel the current In Hudson River Is still flooding. (Sea Tidal Current Charts, New York Harbor.) At such times special care must be taken by largo ships In navigating this channel. B-6 ZURRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS POSIT*Or" TIME DIF. VELOCT UMAXIMUM CURRENTS fERENCES RATIOS Flood Ebb tLt. ta,,. Slack |Moa.i Mo.;. M.li- D-,ee- Aver. Direc. Aver. ~Lot. Log. SIOCt , mumlmum "ha oge tion age urffetnl flood ebb (Irue veloc:. (Iruc reloc. itY ity .. '* . m. | h. m. i deg. knots deg. kno, LONG ISLAND, South Coast-Continued N. W. on THE MARROWS, P.46 rIlae nertdlan, 75'W. 2245 Ponquogue bridge, Shinnecock Bay------ 40 51 72 30 +0 40 40 35 0.5 0.3 250 0.8 090 0.6 22501 Shinnecock Inlet --------------------- 40 51 72 29 -0 20 -O 40 1.5 1.2 350 2.5 170 2.3 2255' Fire I. Inlet, 0.5 mi. S. of Oak Beach 40 38 73 18 +0 15 000 1.4 1.2 080 2.4 245 2.4 2260 Jones Inlet -------------------------- 40 35 73 34 -1 00 -0 55 1.8 1.3 035 3.1 215 2.6 2265 Long Beach, inside, between bridges--- 40 36 73 40 -0 10 40 10 0.3 0.3 075 0.5 275 0.6 2270 East Rockaway Inlet----�-- ---------- 40 35 73 45 -1 25 -1 35 1.3 1.2 040 2.2 225 2.3 2275 Ambrose Light------------------------- 40 27 73 49 See table 5. 228M, Sandy Hook App. Lighted Horn Buoy 2A-- 40 27 73 55 See table S. JAWI I CA BAY 2285 Rockaway Inlet --------------------- 40 34 73 56 -1 45 -2 15 1.1 1.5 085 1.8 245 2.7 2290 Barren Island, east of --------------- 40 35 73 53 -2 00 -2 25 0.7 0.9 005 1.2 190 1.7 2295 Canarsie (midchannel, off pier)------- 40 38 73 53 -1 35 -1 50 0.3 0.3 045 0.5 220 0.7 2300 Beach Channel (bridge)---------------- 40 35 73 49 -1 20 -1 20 1.1 1.0 060 1.9 225 2.0 2305 Grass Hassock Channel ---------------- 40 37 73 47 -1 10 -1 00 0.6 0.5 050 1.0 230 1.0 NEW YORK HARBOR EITRANCE 2310 Ambrose Channel entrance------------- 40 30 73 58 -1 10 -105 1.0 1.2 310 1.7 110 2.3 2315 Ambrose Channel, SE. of West Bank Lt-- 40 32 74 01 (1) -0 25 0.8 0.9 310 1.3 170 1.8 2320 Coney Island Lt., 1.6 miles SSW. of--- 40 33 74 01 -0 10 (2) 0.5 0.8 330 0.8 145 1.5 2325 Ambrose Channel, north end ------------ 40 34 74 02 +0 05 +0 15 0.8 0.9 330 1.3 175 1.9 2330 Coney Island, 0.2 mile west of-------- 40 35 74 01 -0 55 -0 55 0.9 1.0 330 1.5 170 2.0 2335 Ft. Lafayette, channel east of------- 40 36 74 02 (i) (3) 0.6 0.5 345 1.1 195 0.9 2340 THE NARRCOWS, midchannal-------------- 40 37 74 03 Daily predictions 340 1.7 160 2.0 IEW YORK HARBOR, Upper Bay 2345 Tcmpkinsvill e------- ------------- 40 38 74 04 -0 10 +0 20 0.9 1.0 005 1.6 170 2.0 2350 BEy Ridge Channel--------------------- 40 39 74 02 -0 35 -0 45 0.6 0.6 040 1.0 220 1-.1 2355 Red Hook Channel---------------------- 40 40 74 01 -0 35 -0 35 0.6 0.4 355 1.0 170 0.7 2360 Robbins Reef Light, east of----------- 40 39 74 03 +0 10 +O 20 0.8 0.8 015 1.3 205 1.6 2365 Red Hook, 1 mile west of, ------------- 40 41 74 02 +0 45 +1 00 0.8 1.2 025 1.3 205 2.3 2370 Statue of Liberty, east of------------ 40 42 74 02 40 55 +1 00 0.8 1.0 030 1.4 205 1.9 HUDSON RIVER, Ilidchannel' 2375 The Battery, northwest of------------- 40 43 74 02 +1 30 +1 35 0.9 1.2 015 1.5 195 2.3 2380 Desbrosses Street-------------------- 40 43 74 01 +1 35 +1 40 0.9 1.2 010 1.5 ---- 2.3 2335 Chelsea Docks ----------------------- 40 45 74 01 +1 30 +1 40 1.0 1.0 020 1.7 185 2.0 2390 Forty-second Street----------------- 40 46 74 00 +1 35 +1 45 1.0 1.2 030 1.7 --- 2.3 2595 Ninety-sixth Street------------------- 40 48 73 59 +1 40 +1 50 1.0 1.2 030 1.7 ---- 2.3 2400 Grants Tomb, 123d Street ------------- 40 49 73 58 +1 45 +1 5S 0.9 1.2 025 1.6 ---- 2.3 2405 George Washington Bridge-------------- 40 51 73 57 +1 45 +2 00 0.9 1.1 020 1.6 200 2.2 2410 Spuyten Duyvil ---------------------- 40 53 73 56 +2 00 +2 10 0.9 1.1 020 1.6 ---- 2.1 'Current is rotary, turning clockwise. Minimum current of 0.9 knot sets SW. about time of "Slack, flood begins" at The Narrows. Minimum current of 0.5 knot sets NE. about 1 hour before "Slack, ebb begins" at The Narrows. smaximum flood, -Ch 5C0 maximum ebb, +0" 55'. AFlood begins, -Zh 15-; maximum flood, -0" O05; ebb begins, +O4 05- maximum ebb, -1" 50X. 4The values for the Hudson River are for the summer months, when the fresh-water discharge Is a miinimum. B-7 -CURRENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS POSITNI TIME OIF VELOCITY MAXIMUM CURtENTS FERENCES ,ATIOS flood Ebb N, P LACE Mix o Maxil. xi. Drec- Aver. Dire-. Aer. LoOt- mum mum mum fien age lhan age current flood ebb (rue) eloc. (Iruel eoc i l. ity A m. A. in d g. kIatj knot NEW YORX HAR0R, Lower Say . . Wo.n THE MARROWS, P.46 2535 False Hook Channel---------------- -- 40 28 74 00 -1 45 -1 30 1.1 0.7 320 1.8 135 1.4 2540 Sandy Hook, 1.7 miles ENE. of N. Tip-- 40 30 73 59 -1 25 -1 45 0.9 0.8 295 - 3 100 1.7 2545 Sandy Hook and South Chans. (junction) 40 29 73 59 -1 20 -1 20 0.8 0.8 300 1.3 115 1.7 2550 Sandy Hook Chan., 0.4 mi. W. of N. Tip 40 29 74 01 -1 40 -1 50 1.2 0.8 235 2.0 050 1.6 2555 Sandy Hook Pt., 2 mi. W. of (channel)- 40 29 74 04 -1 45 -1 50 0.4 0.3 265 0.f 085 0.6 2560 Chapel Hill South Channel--------- - 40 30 74 03 -1 55 -2 20 0.4 0.3 255 0.7 075 0.6 2565 New Dorp Beach, 1.2 miles south of-- 40 32 74 06 -4 25 -3 55 0.2 0.2 225 0.4 030 0.5 2570 Old Orchard Shoal Lt., 1.2 mi. ENE. of 40 31 74 04 -1 50 -2 05 0.4 0.2 270 0.7 085 0.4 2575 New Oorp Beach, 1.8 miles SE. of----- 0 33 74 04 (4) (4) 0.3 0.3 ---- 0.5 --- 0.5 2580 Midland Beach, 2.6 miles SE. of----- 40 33 74 02 (5) 40 05 0.5 0.6 335 0.8 160 1.3 2585 Coney Island Lt., 1.5 miles SSE. of--- 40 33 74 00 -1 10 (5) 0.6 0.6 310 1.1 125 1.3 2590 Hoffman Island, 0.2 mile west of----- 40 35 74 04 (t) (?) 0.5 0.4 020 0.9 210 0.8 2595 Rockaway Inlet Jetty, 1 mile S'V. of-- 40 32 75 57 -1 50 -1 55 0.7 0.7 285 1.2 140 1.4 2600 Coney Island Channel, west end------ 40 34 74 00 -0 50 -0 45 0.6 0.6 295 1.1 100 1.2 SAiOY HOOK BAY' 2605 Highlands Bridge, Shrewsbury River--- 40 24 73 59 +0 25 +0 25 1.5 1.3 170 2.6 ---- 2.5 2610 Seabright Bridge, Shrewsbury River--- 40 22 73 58 40 55 +1 00 0.8 0.9 185 1.4 ---- 1.7 RARITAN BAY 2615 Point Comfort, 1.5 miles north of----- 40 29 74 08 -1 50 -2 05 0.4 0.3 270 0.6 070 0.6 2620 Keyport Channel entrance-------------- 40 27 74 12 C.rn.t ..& snd ...rbL1,. 2625 Red Bank, 1.4 miles south of---------- 40 29 7413 -135 -2 00. 0.4 0.3 280 0.6 0.5 2630 Seguine Point (in channel) ------------ 40 31 74 12 -1 30 -1 55 0.5 0.31 275 0.S 080 0.6 2635 Great Beds Light---------------------- 40 29 74 15 -1 25 -1 55 0.5 0.5 280 0.8 100 0.9 - The values for the Hudson River ar.e for the summer months, wnen the fresh-water discharge Is a minimum. = In Roundout Creek entrance between Itghts, eddies on the flood make navigation difficult. Little difficulty wll be experIenced on the ebb. 'Current does not flood. 'Current Is rotary, turning clockwise. It flows NW. at time of "Slack, flood begins" at The Narrows; NE. 1 hour after maximum flood; SE. 1. hours after "Slack, ebb begins"; and SW. 2 hours after maximum ebb. 'Current is rotary, turning clockwise. Minimum current of 0.2 knot sets W. about the time of "Slack, flood begins" at The Narrows. Minimum current of 0.2 knot sets ENE. about time of "Slack, ebb begins" at The Narrows. 4Maximum flood, -1' 55'; maximum ebb, -& 55'. "Flood begins, -1- 45;: raximum flood, -1h 50C; ebb begins, -OA 15-; maximum ebb, -CA 50'. I In Sandy Hook Say (excopt In southern extremity) the current is weak. B-8 - TIDAL DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS �I - PoaT~no �DIFFERENCES R ANGES Na )UQ Tirrr~~a ise Heig h t Mean I&. too. I I lid* High I Low I High Lo- M-8o Srinfg Lera waItr water Water wator on WILLETS POINT, p.52 Long Island Sound, North Side 1'253 Port Chester�--------------------- 41-OiF'73 40 -0 09 -0 12 +0.1 0.0 7.2 8.5 3.6 1254 Rye Beach�------------------------ 40 58 73 40 -0 28 -0 29 40.1 0.0 7.2 8.4 3.6 L 255 PEamaroneck------ 40 58 73 44 -0 08 -0 11 40.2 0.0 7.3 8.6 3.6 .1?57 New Rochell e -------------- ------- 40 54 73 47 -0 24 -0 17 *0.1 0.0 7.2 8.6 3.6 U 159 Davids Island-------------------- 40 53 73 46 -0 02 -0 07 40.1 0.0 7.2 8.5 3.6 12961 City Island-- �� 40 51 '73 47 -0 03 -0 03 +0.1 0.0 7.2 8.5 3.6 1263 Throgs Neck � ---------- 40 48 7348 +0 02 +O 14 -0.1 0.0 7.0 8.2 3.5 East River 1265 Whitestone�----------------------- 4- 40-'48-73'49 40 02 40 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 8.3 3.5 126'7 Old Ferry Point--------------------- 40' 48` 73 50 40 04 +0 16 0.0 0.0 7.1 8.3 3.5 126CA College Point, Flushing Bay--------- 40 47 73 51 40 20 40 28 -0.6 0.0 6.5 7.6 3.2 1271% Northern Blvd. BrIdge, FlushIng Cr-. 40 46 13 50 +0 23 40 37 -0.3 0.0 6.8 8.0 3.4 1273 Westchester, Westchester Creek------ 40-50 73*"50 +0 10 +0 16 -0.1 0.0 7.0 8.3 3.5 1275 Hunts Point------------------------- 40 48 73 52 +0 08 40 15 -0.2 0.0 6.9 8.1 3.4 1277 Westchester Ave. BrIdge, Bronx R---- 40 50 73 53 +0 10 +0 17 -0.2 0.0 6.9 8.1 3.4 1279 North Brother Island---------------- 40 48 73 54 +0 09 +0 17 -0.5 O.Q 6.6 7.8 3.3 1281 Port ibrrts (Stony Point)�---------- 40 48 73 54 +0 13 40 16 -0.8 0.0 6.3 7.4 '3.1 1283 Lawrence PoInt ---------------------- 40 -47 73 55 -0 03 +0 13 -0.7 0.0 6.4 7.6 3.2 1285 Wolcott Avenue�-------------------- 40 47 73 55 -0 03 +0 13 -1.0 0.0 8.1 7.2 3.0 on NEW YORK, p.56 1287 .Pot Cove, Astoria---- 40 47 73 56 +2 20 +2 29 +0.8 0.0 5.3 6.3 2.6 31289 H~ell Gate, Hallets Point-------�- 40 47 73 56 +2 00 +2 04 +0.6 0.0 5.1 6.1 2.5 1291 l-;orns Hook, E. 90th Street�------- - 40 47 73 57 +1 50 +1 30 40.3 0.0 4.8 5.8 2.4 1293 Wlelfare Island, north end�-------- 40 46 73 56 +1 45 +1 25 +0.3 0.0 4.8 5.6 2.4 0 1295 3 7th Avenue, Long Island City--- 40 46 73 57 +1 30 +1 10 0.0 0.0 4.5 5.5 2.2 1. 7 Ea st 41st Street, New york Cit y----- 40 45 73 58 +1 20 +0 56 .0.2 0.0 4.3 5.2 2.1 1. '99 Hu nters Point, Newtown Creek------ 40 44 73 57 +1 18 40 53 -0.4 0.0 4.1 4.9 2.0 I, 01 Enl,1ish Kills ent., Newtown Creek--- 40 4 73 55 +130 +104 -0.3 0.0 4.2 5.0 2.1 13 03 Eas;t 27th Street, Bellevue Hospital- 40 44 73 58 +108 +103 -0.3 0.0 4.2 5.0 2.1 13k 15 Eas t 19th Street, New York City--- 4044 73 58 +102 +0 58 -0.4 0.0 4.1 4.9 2.0 130 7 Nor- th 3d Street, Erooklyn------- 40 43 73 58 +0 55 40 42 -0.4 0.0 4.1 4.9 2.0 130. 1 Will iamsburg Bridg e----- 40 43 73 58 +0 52 4O 38 -0.4 0.0 4.1 4.9 2.0 1Z11 1. Wall about EavY � ---- ------ -- 40 42 73 59 +0 50 +0 35 -0.4 0.0 4.1 4.9 2.0 1313 Broot lyn Bridg�----- 40 42 74 00 +0 13 40 07 -0.2 0.0 4.3 5.2 2.1 sari( rh River 1315 E'.110th Street, New York City--- 4047 73 56 +1 52 +1 35 40.8 0.0 5.1 8.1 2.8 1317 W illis Avenue Brii Ige 40 48 73 58 +1 47 +1 30 +0.5 0.0 5.0 6.0 2.5 1319 14 idison Avenue Bridg �----------- 40 49 73 58 +1 52 +1 35 40.4 0.0 4.9 5.9 2.4 1321 Ci ntral Bridge ----------------- 40 50 73 56 +1 52 +1 35 +0.2 0.0 4.7 5.7 2.3 1323 Wa shinqton Bridge---- 40 51 73 58 +1 52 +1 35 .0.1 0.0 4.4 5.2 2.2 13z5 20 7th-Strcet Bridgo------ - 40 52 73 55 +1 40 +1 30 -0.5 0.0 4.0 4.8 2.0 1327 Br. 'adway Oridge-. � ------- 40 52 73 55 +1 20 +1 20 -0.7 0.0 3.8 4.6 1.9 1329 Spi lyten Duyvil Bridge-----� - 40 53 73 56 +1 01. +1 03 0.9 0.0 3.8 4.3 1.8 C-. .TIDAL DIFFERENCES AID OTHER CONSTANTS POSITION OIFFERENCES INGES Na: PAC. Time Height Mean Lat Lon g. Ti de High Low High Low Mean .i"ng Le, . water water water water I*L h h. m. | h cm.1 feet feet feet feet fmt Nt. . l Long island Sound, South Side on W1ILETS POINT, p.52 Time merldlan, 75'�. J [ 1331 WILLETS POINT�--- 40 48 73 47 Daily predictions 7.1 8.3 3.5 1333 Hewlett Polnt ---------------------- 40 50 73 45 -0 03 -0 03 0.0 0.0 7.1 8.3 3.5 1335 Port Washington, Manhasset Bay------ - 40 50 73 42 -0 OI1 +0 11 +0.2 0.0 7.3 8.6 3.6 1337 ExecutIon Rocks -------------------- 40 53 73 44 -0 06 -0 08 +0.2 0.0 7.3 8.6 3.6 1339 Glen Cove, Hempstead Harbor -------- 40 52 73 39 -0 11 -0 06 +0.2 0.0 7.3 8.6 3.6 on BRIDGEPORT, p.43 Oyster Bay 1341 Oyster Bay Harbor--------------- 40 53 73 32 +0 08 40 11 +0.6 0.0 7.3 8.4 3.6 1343 Bayville Bridge----------------- 40 54 73 33 +0 13 +0 18 +0.7 0.0 7.4 8.5 3.7 1345 Cold Spring Harbor-------------- 40 52 73 28 +0 08 +0 06 +0.7 0.0 7.4 8.5 3.7 1347 Eatons Neck Point ------------------ 40 57 73 24 +0 03 +0 06 40.4 0.0 7.1 8.2 3.1; 1349 Lloyd Harbor ent., Huntington Bay--- 40 55 73 26 +0 03 +0 01 +0.7 0.0 7.4 8.5 3.'? 1351 Northport, Northport Bay------------ 40 54 73 21 +0 03 +0 06 +0.6 0.0 7.3 8.4 3..6 1353 Nissequogue River entrance---------- 40 54 73 14 -0 03 -0 06 +0.3 0.0 7.0 8.0 3 .5 1355 Stony Brook, Smithtown Bay---------- 40 55 73 09 +0 08 +0 08 -0.6 0.0 6.1 7.0 3.0 1357 Stratford Shoal�--------------------- 41 04 73 06 -0 05 -0 09 -0.1 0.0 6.6 7.6 '.3 1359 Port Jefferson Harbor entrance------ 40 58 73 05 +0 03 -0 01 -0.1 0.0 6.6 7.6 tS.3 1361 Port Jefferson---------------------- 40 57 73 05 +0 06 +0 03 -0.1 0.0 6.6 7.6 5.3 1363 Setauket Harbor ---------- - --------- 40 57 73 06 +0 04 +0 09 0.0 0.0 6.7 7.7 3.3 1365 Conscience Bay ent. (Narrows)------- 40 58 73 07 0 02 +0 02 0.0 -0.0 6.7 7.7 3.3 1567 Vount Sinai Harbor ------------ - --- 40 58 73 02 40 05 +0 16 -0.7 0.0 6.0 6.9 3.0 1369 Herod Point------------------------- 40 58 72 50 -0 07 -0 16 -0.8 0.0 5.9 6.8 2.9 1370 Northville----------------------- - - 40 59 72 39 -0 02 -0 05 -1.3 0.0 5.4 6.2 2.7 1371 Mattituck Inlet--------------------- 41 01 72 34 +0 05 -O 06 -1.5 0.0 5.2 6.0 2.6 1373 Horton Point------------------------ 41 05 72 27 -0 20 -0 35 '0.60 '0.60 4.0 4.6 2.0 1374 Hashamomuck Beach--------- - -------- 41 06 72 24 +0 04 -0 15 '0.63 '0.63 4.2 4.8 2.1 1375 Truman Beach------------------------ 41 08 72 19 -0 42 -O0 52 *0.51 '0.51 3.4 3.9 1.7 on NEW LONDON, p.4u 1377 Plum Gut Harbor, Plum Island-------- 41 10 72 12 +0 27 +0 16 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.:L 1.3 1379 Little Gull Island------ - - - ------- 41 12 72 0 +0 12 -O 22 -0.4 0.0 2.2 2.6 1.1 SheZter Island Sound 1381 Orient-------------------------- 41 08 72 18 +0 36 +0 36 -0.1 0.0 2.5 3..0 1.2 1383 Greenport----------------------- 41 06 72 22 +1 04 +0 49 -0.2 0.0 2.4 2 .9 1.2 1385 Southold-------------------- 41 04 72 25 +1 43 +1 33 -0.3 0.0 2.3 2.7 1.1 1387 Noyack Bay --- ----------------- 41 00 72 20 +2 05 +1 44 -0.3 0.0 2.3 2..7 1.1 1389 Sag Harbor --------- ----- 41 00 72 18 +0 59 +0 48 -0.1 0.0 2.5 I5.0 1.2 1391 Cedar Point ------- - --------- 41 02 72 16 +0 44 +0 27 -0.1 0.0 Z.5 3.0 1.2 Pecontc Baoys 1393 New Suffolk--------------------- 41 00 72 28 +2 26 +2 11 0.0 0.0 2.6 '3.1 1.3 1395 South Jamesport ---------------- 40 56 72 35 +2 32 +2 40 +0.1 0.0 2.7 3.2 1.3 1397 Shinnecock Canal-- - ----------- 40 54 72 30 +2 33 +2 31 -0.2 0.0 2.4 2.9 1. 1399 Threemile Hbr. ent., Gardiners Bay-- 41 02 72 11 +0 21 +0 02 -0.2 0.0 2.4 2.9 1. 2 1401 Promised Land, Napeague Bay- ------ 41 00 72 05 -O 14 -O 08 -0.3 0.0 2.32..7 1 .1 1403 Mobntauk Harbor entrance------------- 41 04 71 56 -0 25 -0 16 -0.7 0.0 1.9 2.3 0 .9 1405 Mbntauk, Fort Pond Bay------- 41 03 71 58 -0 29 -0 24 -0.5 0.0 2.' . 2.5 1 .1 1407 Montauk Point, north side----------- 41 04 71 52 -1 13 -1 31 -0.6 0.0 2.1 2.4 ,,0 Long Island, South Side on SANDY HOOX, p.64 1409 Shlnnecock Inlet (ocean)------------ 40 50 72 28 -O 50 -1 08 0.63 *0.63 2 9 3.5 1.4 1411 Ponquogue Bridge, Shinnecock Bay---- 40 51 72 30 +0 29 14 -2.3 0.0 2.3 2.8 1. 1413 Potunk Point, boriches Bay---------- 40 48 72 39 +3 35 +3 45 '0.11 '0.11 i.5 0.6 0.2 1415 Morlches inlet--:------------------- 40 46 72 45 -0 56 -1 11 '0.63 '0.63 ;.9 3.5 1.5 1417 Mastic Beach, Mbriches Bay---------- 40 45 72 50 +3 28 +3 39 '0.11 '0.11 0.5 0.6 .2 1419 Fire Island Breakwater-------------- 40 37 73 18 -0 39 -0 51 -0.5 0.0 4.1 5.C 2.^ 1421 Oemocrat Point, Fire Island Inlet--- 40 38 73 18 -0 38 -O0 29 '0.57 '0.57 2.6 3.: '1. 'Ratlo. C-2 -TIDAL DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS * -~ ' ' ~POSITION DIFFERENCES IRANGES o TAcE rim Height Mean Tide Lot. Long. Tide High |o. High | ,v Mean W-g Laval water water water woter * * * . brn.1 A. in feet l et feet feet fed Long Island, South Side- continued M. W. on SANDY HOOK, p.64 Ttre mertdlan, 757'. ' . Great South BaU Z:-22 Fire Island Coast Guard Station- 40 38 73 15 -0 19 -0 17 *0.41 e0.41 1.9 2.3 0.9 :t23 Fire Island Light -------------- 40 38 73 13 +0 47 +1 20 '0.15 '0.15 0.7 0.8 0.3 ;25 West Fire Island---------------- 40 39 73 12 +2 11 +2 16 '0.13 *0.13 0.6 0.7 0.3 ::27 FPoint ol Woods------------------ 40 39 73 08 +2 28 +2 33 '0.15 10.15 0.7 0.8 0.3 :;:9 Bellport, Bellport Bay---------- 40 45 72 56 +3 44 +4 14 '0.17 '0.17 0.8 1.0 0.4 .:;31 Patchogue----------------------- 40 45 73 01 +3 23 +3 47 '0.15 '0.15 0.7 0.8 0.3 1:33 Sayville (Brown Creek)---------- 40 44 73 04 +3 39 +3 44 '0.13 *0.13 0.6 0.7 0.3 4'35 Great River, Connetquot River--: 40 43 73 09 +3 20 +3 30 '0.15 '0.15 0.7 0.8 0.3 ;37 Bay Shore----------------------- 40 43 73 14 +2 23 +2 39 '0.13 '0.13 0.6 0.7 0.3 ::439 Oakbeach ------------ - --------- 40 38 73 17 +2 24 +2 56 '0.15 '0.15 0.7 0.8 0.3 :'41 Babylon------------------------- 40 41 73 19 +2 12 +2 39 '0.13 '0.13 0.6 0.7 0.3 :.43 GlIgo Heading-------------------- 40 37 73 24 +2 23 +2 56 '0.24 '0.24 1.1 1.3 0.5 ::45 Amltyvllle-------------------------- 40 39 73 25 +2 21 +3 03 '0.26 '0.26 1.2 1.4 0.6 :447 8lItmore Shores, South Oyster Bay--- 40 40 73 28 +2 05 +2 30 *0.30 *0.30 1.4 1.7 0.7 :449 Jones Inlet (Point Lookout)--------- 40 35 73 35 -0 19 -0 27 '0.78 '0.78 3.6 4.3 1.8 5empstead Bay . :451 Deep Creek Meadow--------------- 40 36 73 32 +1 02 +1 09 -0.52 '0.52 2.4 2.9 1.2 :453 Green Island ------------------- 40 37 73 30 +1 22 +1 29 '0.41 '0.41 1.9 2.3 0.9 455 Cuba Island --- - --------------- 40 37 73 31 +1 08 +1 20 '0.50 '0.50 2.3 2.8 1.1 ::57 Bellmore, Bellmore Creek-------- 40 40 -73 31 +1-29 +1 56 '0.43 '0.43 2.0 2.4 1.0 ::59 Neds Creek --------------------- 40 37 73 33 +0 50 +0 52 -1.9 0.0 2.7 3.3 1.3 1:61 Freeport Creek --------------- 40 38 73 34 +0 34 +0 27 -1.5 0.0 3.1 3.8 1.5 :653 Freeport, Baldwin Bay----------- 40 38 73 35 +0 38 +0 53 -1.6 0.0 3.0 3.6 1.5 ::65 Long Beach---------------------- 40 36 73 39 +0 19 0 00 -0.7 0.0 3.9 4.7 1.9 ::47 Long Beach, outer coast------------- 40 35 73 39 -0 29 -0 35 -0.1 0.0 4.5 5.4 2.2 Hempstead Bay- Contlnued - - :'69 East Rockaway------------------- 40 38 73 40 +0 42 +0 45 -0.7 0.0 3.9 4.7 1.9 ':71 Woodmere, Brosewere Bay--------- 40 37 73 42 +0 35 -0 48 -0.7 0.0 3.9 4.7 1.9 :473 East Rockaway Inlet----------------- 40 36 73 44 -0 06 -0 16 -0.5 0.0 4.1 5.0 2.0 Ja�atca Bay :475 Plumb Beach Channel------------- 40 35 73 55 40 03 -0 05 +0.3 0.0 4.9 5.9 2.4 :477 Barren Island, Rockaway inlet--- 40 35 73 53 0.00 -0 06 +0.4 0.0 5.0 6.0 2.5 :479 Beach Channel (bridge)---------- 40 35 73 49 +0 38 +0 22 +0.5 0.0 5.1 6.2 2.5 :481 Mbtts Basin--------------------- 40 37 73 46 +0 40 +0 46 +0.8 0.0 5.4 6.5 2.7 ':83 Norton Point, Head of Bay------- 40 38 73 45 +0 39 +0 43 +0.8 0.0 5.4 6.5 2.7 :iS5 J. F. K. International Airport-- 40 37 73 47 +0 26 +0 43 +0.7 0.0 5.3 6.4 2.6 487 Grassy Bay (bridge) ------------- 40 39 73 50 +0 44 +0 45 +0.6 0.0 5.2 6.3 2.6 :439 Canarsle------------------------ 40 38 73 53 +0 25 +0 06 +0.6 0.0 5.2 6.3 2.6 ::91 Mill Basin---------------------- 40 37 73 55 +0 29 +0 02 +0.5 0.0 5.2 6.3 2.6 NEW YORK and NEW JERSEY Kew York Harbor :493 Coney Island------------------------ 40 34 73 59 -0 03 -0 19 40.1 0.0 4.7 5.7 2.3 :'95 Norton Point, Gravesend Boy--------- 40 35 74 00 -0 03 +0 01 40.1 0.0 4.7 5.7 2.3 I:97 Fort Wadsworth, The Narrows--------- 40 36 74 03 +0 02 +0 12 -0.3 0.0 4.3 5.2 2.1 :99 Fort Hamilton, The Narrows ---------- 40 37 74 02 +0 03 +0 05 +0.1 0.0 4.7 5.7 2.3 on NEW YORK, p,56 :'31 Bay Rid9e------ - ----- - --------- 40 38 74 02 -0 24 -0 24 +0.1 0.0 4.6 5.5 2.3 :.03 St. George, Staten Island--- -------- 40 39 74 04 -0 21 -0 18 0.0 0.0 4.5 5.4 2.2 :!05 Bayonne, New Jersey----------- 40 41 74 06 -0 19 -0 08 0 .0 00 4.5 5.4 2.2 ':!7 Gowanus By --40 40 74 01 -0 19 -0 15 -0.1 0.0 4.4 5.3 2.2 G9 Covernors Island------ 40 42 74 01 -0 11 -0 06 -0.1 0.0 4.4 5.3 2.2 ::11 NEW YORK (The Battery)-------- 40 42 74 01 - Daily predictions 4.5 5.4 2.2' "Rati o. --TIDAL DIFFERENCES AND OTHER CONSTANTS ?OSIT*ON 0IFFE9ENCES ZANGES PL~a Lt. Long..1 High Laer High Low M**" LwSp60`9 water Wt. ON~ afar afa LI freet f eet fee -fi nudson River- w. on NEW YORK, p.56 ftme merldtit, 7520. 1513 Jersey City, Pa. RR. Ferry, N. J-- 40 43 74 02 +0 07 40 07 -0.1 0.0 4.4 5.3 2.: 1515 New York, Desbrosses Street---- 40 43 74 01 +0 10 +0 10 -0.1 0.0 4.4 5.3 '2. 1517 New York, Chelsea Oocks- ----- 40 45 74 01 40 17 40 16 -0.2 0.0 4.3 5.2 2.: 1519 Hoboken, Castle Point, N. .----"" 40 45 74 01 40 17 +0 16 -0.2 0.0 4.3 5.2 2.1 1521 Weehawken, Days Point, N. .---- 40 46 74 01 40 24 40 23 -0.3 0.0 4.2 5.0 2.1 1523 New York, Union Stock Yards-- 40 47 74 00 40 27 40 26 -0.3 0.0 4.2 5.0 2.: 1525 New York, 130th Street- -- 4049 73 58 +0 37 -1035 -0.5 0.0 4.0 4.8 2.: 1527 George Washington Bridge----- 40 51 73 57 40 46 40 43 -0.6 0.0 *~.9 4.6 1.; 1529 Spuyten Ouyvil, West of RR. bridge- 40 53 73 56 +0 58 +053 -0.7 0.0 3.8 4.5 1.:' The Kills and Newark Bay on NEW YORK, p.56 fill Van full 154'1 Constable Hook- -- 40 39 74 05 -034 -0 21 0.0 0. 4.5 5.4 2.2 1573 New Brighton----- - 40 39 74 05 -0 12 -018 0.0 0.0 4.5 5.4 2.2 1575 Port Richmond----- 40 38 7408 -003 4005 0.0 0.0 4.5 5.4 2.2 1577 B ergen Point 40 39 74 08 40 03 410 03 40.1 0.0 4.6 5.5 2.3 1579 Shooters Island 40 39 74 10 4006 0 40.2 0.0 4.6 5.5 2.3 MI1 Port Newark Terminal ---------------- � 40 41 74 08 -0 01 40 18 40.6 0.0 5.1 6.1 2.5 1583 Newark, Passaic River--- 40 44 74 10 40 22 -*0 52 40.6 0.0 5.1 6.1 2.5 1585 Passaic, Gregory Ave. brid ge 40 5. 74 07 40 49 +1 57 40.6 0.0 5.1 6.1 2.5 Rac9 ensack Riter 1586 Kearny Point�-------------- --40 44 74 06 +0 09 +0 33 5 0 5.0 6.0 2.5 1587 Secaucus 40 48 74 04 +113 +109 40.6 0.0 5.1 6.1 2.6 1588 Little Ferry---- ~ ------ 40 51 74 02 +1 22 +114 40.8 0.0 5.3 6.4 2.7 1589 Hackensack---- 40 53 74 02 +133 +158 +0.8 0.0 5.3 6.4. 2.6 on SANDY HOOK, p.65 Arthur illt 1591 E I I zabeth port 40 39 7411 0.0 4.9 5.9 2.4 1593 Chelsea�---------- ------ ----- 40 36 74 12 -0 24 4035 40.4 0.0 5.0 6.0 2.5 1595 Carteret4----------- - -----------0 35 74 13 +0 23 40 31 40.5 0.0 5.1 6.2 2.6 1597 Rossvill�-------- �----- ------ - 40 33 74 13 +0 17 +0 25 40.7 0.0 5.3 6.4 2.6 1599 Tottenvillle------------------� 40 31 74 15 +0 03 40 13 40.7 0.0 5.3 6.4 2.6 160M Perth Ambo y�------------- ----40 30 74 16 40 13 40 19 40.6 0. 5.2 6.3 2.6 Lower New Yqrk gay, Raritan Bay,etc. I 'lie xrrdaln. 75W. .- :603 N-* wrp beac �0----------- ---------- 4034 74 06 -0 04 +0 04 40.3 0.0 4.9 5.9 2.4 :S05 Great Kills Harbo�------------------ 40 33 74 08 +0 07 40 19 +0.1 0.0 4.7 5.7 2.4 I 1207 Princes �ay�------------ 40 31 74 12 +0 01 40 04 10.3 0.0 4.9 5.9 2.4 Raritaln Rtvcr South Amboy--------------------- 40 29 74 17 +0 05 40 15 40.4 0.0 5.0 6.0 2.5 :812. Washington Canal------- - -- --- 40 28 74 22 40 34 +0 50 +1.0 0.0 5.6 6.8 2.8 :813 South River highway bridg e------ 40 27 74 22 +0 55 +1 02 +0.9 0.0 5.5 6.7 2.8 :615'l New Brunswick�---------------- 40 29 74 26 -0 46 +1 26 +1.2 0.0 5.8 7.0 2.9 :j17 Keyport�------ 40 26 74 12 40 00 +0 19 40.4 0.0 5.0 6.0 2.5 :619 Keansburg--------------� ------- 40 27 74 09 -0 03 -0 01 -0.3 0.0 4.9 5.9 2.4 :621 jPort W'nmouth-------- ------� ---- 40 26 74 05 -0 02 -0 02 +0.2 0.0 4.8 5.8 2.4 :623 Atlantic Highlands---��-------- 40 25 74 02 -0 01 000 40.1 0.0 4.7 5.7 2.3 :625 SAII2Y HOOK�--------------------- 40 28 74 01 DaIly predictions 4.6 5.6 2.3 c-4 0 NYS DEPARTMENT OF Et'- ENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION ,"URE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOURCE DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN* PLANNING AREA AND NAME- - PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTO STA EPA SMP- SEG* NO. ' _,'AREA-'REG _CNTY C B -8 - NAME A. LOCATION FLOW FLOW --CAT CYCL. CAT ' RPT' INF' NO.- ----------------~-----~------------------ -------------------------------------------- 0007811 '- -. 1 28 '-0 -AFCO PLA5TICS CORP FREEPORT'V_'_'__. 000.000 -000.029, N S2 a0 00127, 0075582 01 1 47 2 0 AIRBORNE INSTRUMENTS LAB DEER PARK 000.069 000.000 94 HO P OHIO. 0088447 01 1 47 3 0 ALLSTATE REGIONAL HO BROOKIJAVEN T 000.128 a000.000 M 03. X 04103 01 `147-"47-~2 0'~_'AE ERICAN METAL FINISHERS INC----- -0000000 00.000-- 00143 01 2 61 2 0 AMERICAN SUGAR BROOKLYN 000.000 000,000 00315 0084905 DI 1 47 2 0 ANTENNA At RADOME RESRCH BAYS-ORE V 000.000 0 .0.000 a P 03778 0033189 DI-- 12T64-4'O -ARTHUR KIUL REHAB CT TRT' PLANT----- 000'0100.""0' 00N 04048l 0079502 01 1 47 '6 0 ARTIST LAKE CONDO MIDDLE ISLAND V 0004.097 -000.000. 9 02 -- 1. . ,3792 a 0079464 01 1 47 6 0 ARTIST LAKE V HOMEOWNERS MIQ IS V 000.118 000.000 94 02 . 03830 0074764- 01-- 1 47-'2'-O _'ASTRO ELECTROPLATING INC BABYLON'T__00_0O*O00'_.ooQ WN o P00106-- 0008095 01 2 61 2 0 ATLANTIC PASTE & GLUE BROOKLYN ... 000.000 000.000 0 0031? 0084841 01 1 47 2 0 AUTH ELEO CO INC DEER PARK V 000.005 000.000 H MD P 03771 0084549 -10 T 147-2 O -B H AIRCRAFT CO INC FARMINGDALE V 000. 011 000.000 MO' Ho. -P'.00136 0028398 -01 1I 28 2 0 8 P OIL O8RP OCEAN SIDE 000.000 000.00 0 .03065 0074284 01 1 47 1 0 BABYLON T SCAVENGER TAT PLT 000.266 000.000 H 03 03541 OO082481O-~~(lt`- 1 7608 aL`O ~- BALMORAL AT' SPRING' LAKE CORAM-V__- OO650000O,0QO-- --7S3-- 03860.. 0026450 -01 1 28 1 0 BAY PARK SO EAST ROCKAWAY M . 060.000 000.000 N 01 a P 00084 0077437 01 1 47 1 0 BAY SHORE SCAV PLT BAY SHORE V 000.120 .000.000 H 01- 03731 - 01OI_~-ED- 64 4 0 13ETHLEHEM STEEL CORICCHMONO 000.059 000.000 00093 0065463 01 1 4 6 0 BIRCHWOOD GLEN GARDEN APTS 8ROOKHAV 000.100a 000.000 S 01 02536 0079511 D1 1 47 6, 0 BIRCHWOOD NORTH SHORE BROOKMAVEN'T 000.200 000.000 H 02 03794 ~007T2830FI ~O 1_-1 47 6 -~-'BIRCHWOOO ON THE GREEN OAKDALE V 000.009 000000 HM' S17T--- 03719 0065455 01 1 41 6 0 8IRCHWOOO SAGAMORE HILL CONDOMINIUM 000.080 000.000 H Ss 02535 0085499 DI 1 47 2 0 BIX SERVIOE CORAM V 000.001 000.000 H S4 03891 NYS DEPARTMENT OF FNVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE 116 0 DIVISIOrV PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE &OuuCE DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINfL PLANNING AREA AND NAME - -------------------- -- ---- ------r---r----~---rr-----r------r------------------------ ---- PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTO STR EPA, $MP SEQ. _ NO. AREA REO CNTY C B NAME LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAt CYCL CAT RPT INF NO-. ----------r-------r-------~---r---------- --------------------------------------------- 0025518 01 1 41 2 QBILUE POINT Co W SAYVILLE 000.000 000.01 N flO 0 0 00133 0079448 01 1 41 7 6 0 BLUE RIDGE HONE ASSOC MEDFORD V 0000200 000.000 - H M 02 03877 0075728 01 1 47. 2 0 BOLAR PHARMACEUTICAL CO CPRA61UE T 000.001 00 0000 H M MO 00201 00773480--1 O- 47 6 OBRENTWOODGARDEN APTS BRENTW0OD V.O0O.0360on0000 00. 4A?. 03792. 0065366 01 1 47 6 0 BRETTON WOODS CONDOMINIUM BROOKHAVE 000.275 000.000 H 03 02534 01 2 64 0 BREWER ORY DOCK STATEN ISLAND 000.000 000.000 . . 00293 0028266 .01 1 - 47 299BRIDGEVIEW DUCK FARM RIVERMEAO 'T___00Q.120' 000.600f(.- P. 00154 . - ~1 01 1 47 2 9 BRIDGEVIEW DUCK FARM RIVENREAD T 000.120 P 03612 0026930 GI 1 47 2 9 BROAD COVE DUCK FARM RIVERHEADT 000.600 000.000 X P 005 s 01r- 1`~il 472 `~'9B- BR0A0 COVE-DUCKIFARM-RIVERtlEAD-T0---00.'600.-------- P 03622 0087807 01 1 47 1 0 BROMPTON RECHARGE BASIN BROMPTON V 000.300 000*000 M SS 03898 0084671 01 2 61 0 BROOKOALE HOSPITAL MED CT RROOKLYN 000.001 000.000 H MO 03826 0074730 01 1- 47 40 BROOKHAVeN MEMOR HOSP EPATCHOGUE' V000O150 o000OOM-"-03' 03540 0005835 91 1I47 4 'O BROOKHAVEN NATL LABORATORY UPTON _ 002.300 000.000 N. 02 0 00094. 0079332 01 1 47 1 Q BROOKHAVEN SCAV PLANT BROOKHAVEN T 000.050 0004004 94 Al 04117 00 7 4 7 5 6"-~ 01 1 `47 OO R`~P ~'BROOKWOOD COMMUNITIES SIP CORAM V0 00 .;044 1- 000.00 "CMMAUIES 034T6P 0008362 01 1 I 47 2 0 BULOVA WATCH COINCSAG HARBOR V 0 00.009 - 000a000 N MO 03712 - 0005223 01 2 61 2 0 BUSH TERMINAL ASSOC BROOKLYN 000,000 000.000 N HO E P 00306 0 0782 8 o- i-.7-47 2 9 C & R DUCK FARM RIVERHEAOVT 000.075s p00.0- 7P 00118 01 1 47 2 9 C L R DUCK FARM RIVERHEAD T 000,075 . P 03631 0027821 01 1 47 2 9 C & R DUCK FARM SOUTHAMPTON c 0oI0.0 000.000 X P 00145 01 1 47 2 9 C & R DUCK FARM SOUTHAMPTON 000100 .P- 03632 0080616 01 1 47 6 0 CALVERTON MILLS CALVERTON V 000.060 000.000 H c5 _ SS. 03896 0074713 01 1 47 2 0 CAROWELL CONDENSER LINDENHURST V 000.008 .000.000 H MO P 00158 - - _ - - - . . -. ~ - - - - - . - - _ _ - ...~~~~~~~~~~~~~ j4L/05/76 NYS DEPARTMENT u.F ENVIR NTAL CONSERVATION P DIVISION OF W WATERS SURFACE. WASTE SOURCE'_.SCHARGE INVENTORY . REPORT BY BASIN* PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 --------------- -------~~----~------------- ----------------- ----------- --------------- - PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. - - AREA--RE '--CNT.Y-C 8 NAME & LOCATION__"_ FLOW FLOW --CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO. - -------'---`"----------~--------------- ----"'~--------------------~------------------------------------- 0027928 01 I- 47 5 a CARmEN RIVER DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN T 000 o .144 0 000.000 a P 00140 0079:341 ol 0 1 47 6 0 CAVALIER ASSOCIATES HOLTSVILLE V 000.034 000.000.H4 A6 03550 0080586 01 1 47 4 0 CEDAR LODGE NSG HOME CT MORICHES V 000.030 000.000 N AS 03825 0022462__ Ul T 1 281_ I-0 '- CEDARHUR5T . V--- -- O o I . O O 00o 86 N0020, 8-6-pN-oo__P '001S3 0077291 101 I.47 4 0 CENTRAL 1SLIP PSYCH CT ISLIR T 001.500 000.000 4 03. 03558 0076171 61 1 28 2 0 CERRO WIRE & CABLE CO SYOSSET V 000*254 000.000 M MO p 00202 0027791-- 0 I 47 -2- 9 CERTIFIED DUCK FARM BR0OKHAVEN'--O00.050- 00.000-X� P XO-l;--------- 01 1 47I 2 9 CERTIFIED DUCK FARM-BROOKHAVEN T _ - P 03633 0084573 01 1 47 2 0 CHARLES SOHWENK DAIRY E HAMPTON T 000.050 000.000 H MO x 00029 jl. OOeil604--or-0 14_r~7'_2 0-0-.C CHASSAN METAL PR0DUCT FARHI:METAL PRODUCT FARMINGDALE -A0. 001 000.oO0 H 6 03702 0075655 01 1 47 2 0 CIRCUITRUN CORP E FARMINGDAUE V 000.001 000.000 H MO P- 00144 0023299 01 1 28 2 0 CITIES SERVICE OIL INWOOD V a 0.I090 0 00O.0 N 01 04 00146 0 0 6544 T__0 I 1 __47 -_6' 0 COLLEGE PARK SUBDIVISION BROOKHAVEN -000*0B4 00.000 - H S4 '-02575 0004715 01 2 61 2 0 COLONIAL SAND STONE BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N Q2 E 00305 0004723 01 1 28 2 0 COLONIAL SAND & STONE CEDARHURST V 000.000 000.000- N 52. 00147 -0004758 01-- 2 62-2_0 COLONIAL SAND & STONE NEW YORK-o0o0o00 00 O.0 0 N a2 'N 00248.'- .0004740 I1 .2 62 2 0 COLONIAL SAND &STONE NEW YORK 000.000 000.000 N 02 00249 0004766 01 2 62 2 0 COLONIAL SAND & STONE NEW YORK 000.000 000.000 N 01 00251 0004791 0 -01- 2 64 2 0"COLONIAL SAND & STONE STATEN ISV-- 000.000 000.000 __N Q02 ------- - 00304 _ 01 1 28 4 0 COLUMBIA AIR CRAFT VALLEY STREAM V 000.065 000.009 00100 00815.74 01 1 47 2 o COMCO PLASTICS INC E FARMINGDALE V 000.000 000.00 0 P 56 . 03823 0077402 01 1~ '476-(i:- 0 CONCORD VILLAGE CENTRAL ISLIP V_- 000.150 000.000MQ1 -- 04137 -- 0026182 01 2 61 1 0 CONEY ISLAND WWTP NYC DWR 110.000 091.900 N 02. E P. 00298 0008222 01 1 47 2 0 CONNETQUOT RIVER CLUB OAKOALE 04015 -. . -- ..-..,. .*~~~~~~~~~~~--��--*<-. *--.**'.'-...-.---~- .. -.....,....;. ,-. c'. NYS DEPARTMENT OF EN1"'ONMENTAL CONSERVATION ~GE 120 DIVISION lURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOUR%,ci DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINw PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 __ __ 17 ______________ -- - -. ., .-..,. . - PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STA EPA SHP SEQ. NO. --AREA -REG CNTY C' U . NAMEA LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT - INF' NO. --,---i----------r------------- r-------- v-------------------------------------------- 006964801i 1 47 - 2 0 0'-CONTROL OMEMICAL CORP BABYLON T ---000.001 "000.000 S S3 .04176 0081639 01 1 47 2 0 CONVECTRON INC FARMINGDALE V 000.002 000.0O M 56. 03759 01 1 - 47 2 0 CORAM WASWBUCKET BROOKHAVEN T 000.000 000.000 00123 0 6 01a~l~ !1 472 0 COR1NA INSULATED WIRE FARMINGDALE 000.001 000.000 H S_ 00156 0080667 01 1 47 6 0 COVENTRY TOWN HOUSE MIDDLE IS V __ 000.060 000.000 a4 -5S3 _ 03867 0075809. 01 1 47 2 0 DAYTON T BROWN INC BOHEMIA V . 000.006 000.000 H HO P 02991 0065391 0 1 47600EER PARK AIRPORT CONDOMINIUM BABYLO00.082 00000 S --,ISi 0590 0086045 01 1 47 2 0 BEL LABORATORIES INC FARMINGDALE V 000.010 000.00 0 0 53M - 03862 0075761 01 1 47 2 0 DELTOWN FOODS INC COPIAGUE V 000.037 00o o000 H MO 03503 ~'00o50o so8B 2--o i i 6 12 0-Z D' O - O IAMOND PR I NT WORKS -ABROOKLYN PRINTWK- O00000.00O 00295 0086053 01 1 47 2 0 DONORA ME6 CO INC HOLTSVILLE V 000.0 0 1 000.*000 H - HO '03904 0077356 01 1 47 4 0 DOWLING COLLEGE OAKDALE V 0 000.043 000.00Q H A& 03551 000750101 1 028-200O-DPW OCEANSIDE INCIN OCEANSIDE V 04002 0080705 01 1 47 30O' DUTCH INNS HOTEL RONKONKOMA V 000.056 000.000 H S4 03888 0085863 01 1 47 2 0 'DYNA CORP MEDFORD V 000.001, 000.000 H 3 03863 0 1 1j--47 -720 -OZUS FASTENER CO INC-ISIP ___ 00110, 0075884 01 1 47 2 0 E B STIMPSON CO INC BAYPORT V 000.000 000.000 H MO P 0015? 0086487 01 1 47 3 0 E HAMPTON LAUNDRY E HAMPTON V 000.006 000.000 H MD 00129 01 1 472 0 ELECTRICAL FITTNGS 'CO FARMINGDALE 000.O00 00.00, no 00115 01 1 47 2 0 ELMONT ANALYTICAL LAB BABYLON T 000.000 000,000 0 U114- 0030333 01 2 64 6 0 ELHWOOD PARK INC STATEN ISLAND PROP P. 04064 0077453 01 1 47 6 0 EMERALD GREEN ASSOC HOLBROOK V 000.027 000.000 H A6 - r 03556 002B118 01 1 47 2 9 EMERY TUTTLE DUCK FARM SOUTHAMPTON 000.100 000.000 X -P 00125 01 1 47 2 9 EMERY TUTTLE DUCK FARM SOUTHAMPTON P 03662 __~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-- * .<*' . - " NYS DEPARTMENT OF f"W NMENTAL CONSERVATION E 121 DIVISION. PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOURCE DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN. PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 - . . . . .. -------------'-------------1------------- ----- --------------------------------------- PE.RMIT PING T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SHP SEQ* NO. AREA' REO- CNTY C B.NAME & LOCATION- FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO. �-------------------------------- 0075493 - 01 1 47 2 0 ENTENMANS BAKERY BAY SHORE T 000.250 000.000 H MO 00109H 0081591 01 1 47 2 0 EXTRUDYNE INC AMITYVILLE V 000,001 000.000 H HO . 03747 0005339 01 2 61' 2 0 EXXON CO BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N 01 E 00301 --0025577 -0 - 0I 1128 2 ' 0 EXXON CORP OCEANSIDE V.- 0 a00000 000.000 N 01 E 00135 0074276 01 1 47 2 0 FAIRCHILD REPUBLIC CO FARHINGDALE 000.500 000.000 H 55 03465 0074314 01 1 47 6 0 FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS 000.035 000.000 H A5 03506 *0075698 -- 01 1I--74 2 '0 FAIRFIELD NOBLE CORP BABYLON T 000.200 "000,000 N MO --.P 02990 0074322 01 1 47 6 0 FAIRHAVEN APARTMENTS NESCON$ET V 000*050 000.000 H AS 03508 0080918 01 1 47 2 0 FARMINGDALE GRANITE SALES BABYLON T 000.006 000.000 H HO 03761 r~n 0080942 0-1 1 --47 2 0 FARMINGDALE MATERIAL HANDLING CORP 000.000 O00.000M M0 03746 0073563 01 2 64 3 0 FIRST FEDERAL SAV L LOAN NEW YORK 000.005 000.000 S A3 03013 0075680 01 1 47 2 0 FRANK TOOLE & SON INC FARMINGDALE V 000.002 000 .000 H HO 0p 03743 r-0030481 I0 1 2- I 0 FREEPORT .004 000 04069- N'--'03-A P 00138 01 1 28 2 0 GALAXY LITHO INC FARMINGDALE V 000.000 000.000 - 00091 0027839 01 1 47 2 9 GALLO BROS DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN T 000.300 000.000 X P 00078 0 - - 4 7 9 GALLO BROS DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN-T' OO 00.300 -P- 03636 00755518 e1 1 47 2O GERHAINE NONTEIL COSMET BABYLON T 000*002 000.000-( -MO - 03059 0079545 01 1 47 2 0 GLOBAL STEEL PROD BABYLON T 000.000 000,000 H me P 00089 oo1Se5 O~I- l 47-2<o-0 ~ GOLDISC RECORDING5 INC HOLBROOK V 000.000000.a000 M -56 S 6 00059P 0077313 01 1 47 4 0 GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL W ISLIP V 000.165 000.000 o 01 03720 01 2 61 2 0 GOYA FOODS BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 00310 0F I----I1 2 0 GRAPHIC COMPONENTS INC COPIAGUEV--- 000000 000.000 a - O( O 0 0074. 0075604 01 I 47 2 *0 GRAPHIC ELECTRO CRCTS DEER PARK V' 000.000 000.000 ... MO' T00073 0074349 01. 1 47 6. 0 GREENTREE CONDOMINIUMS MIDDLE IS V 000.076 000.000 H AS 03510 NYS ODPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAoE 142 SURFACE WASTE SOLz DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINs PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 -- --__-_ - - - - - - - -- - - - --- 17 . - -*-*- ---~-------* -------- - . ---------- *- - -------------------------- PERMIT PLNG T T . DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SHP SEQ. *NO. AHLA HEG rCNTY C U NAME & LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO , 0065421 01 1 47.6 0 GREENTREE COUNTRY CONDOMINIUM BROOK - 000.075 000.000 M Ss 02629 0075701 01 1 . 47 2 0 GRINNELL LITHOGRAPHING CO ISL *P T 000*005 000.000 m 9' *** 00072 0007838 01 2 61 3 0 GROSSEN PROPERTIES INC BROOKLYN 04005 01 1 28a 0 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE CORP BETHPAGE V 000.000 0000 G . 03700 0081663 01 1 47 2 0 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE CORP ISLIP T. *000.000 - 000,000 -..3. _____ 00066. 0081663 01 1 47 2 0 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE GREAT RIVER' V 000.000 000.000 H O H 03749 . 0085529 01I 1 47 2 0 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE WYANDANCH V -000,000 000.000 N 54 - 03881 0025453 01 1 47 2 0 GRUMMAN AIRCRAFT-SAO HARBOk V___ 000*0.088 00 0.00 0 N 03 E ______ 00071 0004871 01 2 61 4 0 GSA FEDERAL BLDG BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N XX 03769 0004502- 01 T-2 64 --2- 0-'GULF OIL CORP STATEN ISLAND- . -000,000 000.0000 00316. 0005O97 01 1 28 2 0 GULF OIL OCEAN SIDE 00..000 000.000 N 01 E _____ 00092 0005304 01 1 47 2 0 H F. CORWIt! & SON INC AQUEBOGUE 001.440 001.350 N 01 P7- 0008z 008456501 1 47- 2 0- MALLMARK NAMEPLATECF4MINGDOAE-V 000.008 0 I0D00 - H ?4O _P0 777O 0076449 01 1 47 4 0' HAMPTON IJOSP & MED CT SOUTHAMPTON.000.100 0006009 H AS_ _ _ 03469 - 0023116 01 1 47 6 0 HARBOUR APTS BABYLON -t 000.090 00000 - 00079 0079375 511 47 601 H EATIERWOO MOUSE RONKONKOMA 000,030 000.000 M A7 03745 _00117321 01 1 47 6 0 HEATHERWO6O HOUSE RONKONKOMA V CO 000090 000.00. 0 Si 03730 0007498 01 1 28 1 0 HEMPSTEAD T TOWN INCINERATOR 000.090 00 010 10 P 03929 oo IBI?3 - '01" '--'1 47 6 O HIGHVIEW ASSOCIATES SELDEN V 000.088 000.000 H 03436 ____ 0077372 01 1 47 6 0 HILLCREST VILLAGE HOLBROOK V________ 000.075 000.000 4 __S6______ 03553 0075795 01 1 47 2 0 HISTACOUNT CORP BABYLON T 000.000 000.000 M MO P 00081 008167101 1 47 2 0 HOUSE OF PLASTICS FARMINGOALt V 000.051 000.000 H MO 03760 0076210 01 1 28 2 0 HUGHS-TREITLER HEMPSTEAD T 0 000.000 000.01 0 IP P 00080 01 2 64 2 0 HYMAN MUSS SONS STATEN ISLAND 000.000 000.000 00313 OtPAR1bUtYI r~ W4LWA A~L CO~dS(uvaIIo, SURFACE WASTE: *OU.4 OISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN* PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 ~~~~~~~--------~-------~~,,,;--- ------------------------------------------------ PERMIT PLN6 T T (DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SHP SEQ. NO._' PREA-RERI CNTY-LC NAME T LOCATION' .FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO. 0026441 __ 01 I-"-- 28 ''1 0 INHOOD SI HEMSTEAD T - 000.900 000.000 N G1 E. P 00086 0079413 01 1 47 4 0 IRS/ADP CENTER HOLTSVILLE V 000.165 000.000 M G1 03754 0075647 01 1 47 2 0 IVERSON CYCLE CORP MEDFORD V 000.000 000.000 P 03775 00o o 26 1 1 S0I-- O iT" 2 -_ 63 --1 0"JAMACIA WWTP NYC DWR 100.000 092.000 N 02 E - P 00312 0081540 01 1 47 2 0 JAMECO INDUSTRIES BABYLON T 000.036 000.000 M MO P 00067 DI 2 61 2 0 JAYEM MFG CORP BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 D. 00266 002778Z at 1-472 -9-JHN ROMANOWSKI DUCK FM' BROOKHAVEN - 000.030 _'000.000- X -. 00139 01 1 47 2 9 JOHN ROMANOwSKI DUCK FM BkOOKHAVEN.. . P 03652 0077A29 01 1 47 3 0 JOHN SMYTI4E FOOD SERV HAUPPAUGE V 000.100 000.000 n S6- 03703 00 401- 01 1 28-40--J0'ONES BEACH WWTP'WANTAGH V N-0025000000;00N03 P 00099 0008125 01 1 47 5 0 JURGIELEWICZ DUCK FARM MORICHES V -'--000.360o-- 00.370,"' N 03 P 00137 0028134 01 1 47 2 9 KANAS DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN T 000.030 000.000 X P 00049 01- 1--47-2-9 KANAS DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN T P.- P03630 0026760 01 2 64 6 0 KAUFMAN & BROAD HOMES INC RHCHMOND 001.000' 000.000 N 01 E' P.." 00275 0084859 01 1 47 2 0 KEEL MFG CORP HAUPPAUGE V 000.506 000.000 N. MO 03878 0085871 0101-l47-2-'0' KENSOL-OLSENMARK INC-MELVLLE-LV---0O. 00 2 00000'0D4- 03890 00 ob1 4 01 2 - 61 2 0 KENTILE KLOORS INC BROOKLYN 000.00 0 -- 000000 N S4 00292 0085502 01 1 47 2 0 KETCHUM LABS INC AMITYVILLE V 000.002 000.000 m NO 03874 00ooB9O65-OlF.-71-47 K2-N-'K-NENOTIVE CORPORATION BABYLONr-T 00.002-000-00-,S---mo', 04175 ________ 0080527 01 1 47 6 0 KINGS CREEK STP YAPHANK V 000.3350 000.00 0 M 3. - 03859 0075957 01 1 47 2 0 KOLLMDRGEN CORP RIVERHEAD T 000.525 000.000 N NO: 00128 00758922-01 V4V2K0-KOSTERK KEUNEN INCSAYVILLEV -00O.0,o0 -00O.00gM-Mo ( 00032 0004898 01 I 47 2 0, L I DUCK FARMERS COOP INC E PORT- 000.250' 000.000 N' 03 P 00034 0007552 01 1 47 2 0 L I ICE . FUEL RIVERHEAD V 000.050 000.000 N S5 00013 -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~.~ .,,. .-..-b..-..-. .-:. jz2/0 $1. NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE 124- 4N DIVISID "F PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE G CE DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN, PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 ---------------------- ----------~--------~--------'---------------- ---------------------- PERMIT PLNG r T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTO STR EPA SHP SEQG NO. ARLA REG CNTY- C B NAME & LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL. CAT RPT INF NO * ----------- ---------- ----L------------~-------~--------------------------------------- 00366410 -1 1 47 20 L I LIGHTING Co JAMESPORTV .-03933 0005924 01 2 63 2 0 L I LIGHTING FAR ROCKAWAY 000*446 000.000 N MO p - - -00261 0005908 01 1 28 2 0 L I LIGHTING ISLAND PK V 293.800 a000000 N MO P 00035 0o 7 95 53'0 1--- 1'-- .^k 47 6-0- LA BONNE VIE APTS CORAM V I *000.060 "~ 000.0001 . -S2 03820 0079472 01 1 47 3 0 LAKE GROVE SHOP CT LAKE GROVE V 000.050 000.000 A7 03195 0073385 01 1 28 2 0 LAWRENCE d BENNETT INC GARORN CITY . 000.000 000.009 14 MO - 03015 0020354 28 1I . LAWRENCE V ..500 000.750 N 03.-0 P 00030 0079359 el 1 47 6 0 LEISURE VILLAGE RIDGE V' 0040.495 00O.0DIC 1 0 03758 01 1 47 2 0 LERNER HMG CO MELVILLE, V . 0.ooo 00000 . 00058 0080683011 47 6 0 LEVITT MOUSE0SIP 31EDF1RO 1.000 0 00 7 Q3. . 03868 0077399 01 1 47 6 0 LEXINGTON VIL AT BAY SHORE ISLIP T 000.021 _00ooo.o s Al 04126 0081558 01 1 47 2 0 LINCOLN GRAPHIC ARTS FARMINGDALE V 0 00.056 000.000 H MO P 00041 0020567 01 I 28 1 0 LONG BEACU C OPW 006.360 006.870 ThE 03 A P 0033 00058190el I 28 20 LONG ISL SEA CLAM CORP PT LOOKOUT V 000.000 000_ 000 A 00020 0 0080926 01 1 47 2 0 LONG ISLAND BAKING LINDENHURST T 0000 05 000.00*0 1 MO 0 0 009. 01 1 47 2 0 -MACKENZIE CHEMICAL WORKS ISLIP T- 000.000 1009.000 * - -7oo - -- 0084875 01 1 47 2 0 MAGNUS M96 LTD CENTRAL ISLIP V1 000.001 000D000 M S6 03831 0075949 01 1 47 2 0 MAJESTIC MOLDED PROD INC ISLIP T 0 000.003 000#009 M S6 03055 0 0008079 0'_1 1-2 61 2-0 MANHATTAN ADHESIVES CORP BROOKLYN - - 04014 0027944 01 1 47 2 0 MASSEY DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN T 000,025 000000 p O P e 00070 0084557 01 1 47 2 0 MASTER CRAFT FINISHERS DEER PARK V 000.001 000.000 m HO P 03776 0075868 01 1-47-2 0 MEADOWBROOK OISTRIB CO PATCHOGUE V . 000.045 000.000 S '__MO 03643 at 1 47 2.0 MECOX BAY POULTRY FM SOUTHAMPTON ___ 000.130- 000.000 -0 00039 0004669 01 2 62 Z 0 MERCHANTS REFRIGERATION NEW YORK 004.020 000.000 N 02 E 0 00271 -U...~~~~~~~~~)--- 0o~~~~2/o0s/7 NYS DEPARTMENr OF E MENTA CONSfRVAT! % '~e.W~ DIVISION 1P RE WATERS SURFACE WASTE $OU-i'/E DISCHARGE INVENTORY .........REPORT BY BASIN. PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 - -------------------------------------------------------------------r-----r---r---,---- - PERMIT PLNG' T T ' DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SHP SEQ. NO. A--REA REG CNTY C 8 NAME & LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO, - --------------------- ------------------- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - -- - - -- - - -- -. 0028282- 01 2 -61 2 ' 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM CO BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 03063 ... 0028291 01 2 61 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM CO BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 . 03064 .- 0007714 01 2 61 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM MADISON TERM 000.000 000,000 N D1 E 00289 .-' 0080632- 01 ..1- 41 -6 0 MIDDLE IS GARDEN APTS BROOKHAVEN T 000.030 000039020 H... .. . ..... 0085839 01 1 47 2 0 MIDLAND PHOTO SERVICE PATCHOGUE V 000.000 000.009 H MO P 03779 01 1 28 2 0 MOBIL OIL CO INWOOD V 000000 000.000 . 00069 *-"-0004961- 01 2 64 '2 0 MOBIL OIL STATEN ISLAND. 000000 000.000 -N 01 00273. 0021041 01 2 64 2 0 MOBIL OIL STATEN ISLAND 000.000 000.000 N 01 00288 0021644 01 1 47 4 0 MONTAUK AE STATION MONTAUK 000,142 000.000 N S6 E 00098 -- -0008036 ...0 --1 47-2 ' O''MORICHES DUCK FARM MORICHES V 000,214' 000.000- N P .03 P." 00022 0020460 01 1 28 4 0 N Y INST OF TECHNOLOGY OLD WESTBURY 000.000 000.00 D 00060 0005517 01 2 64 2 0 NASSAU SMELTING L REFINING RICHMOND 000.331 000o079 N MO E P 00285 * 0085847-O 01'--1:-- 47--72- 0' NATIONAL GABRICATING COPIAGUE' V ...000, 0 02 .00 S4. ' 0-'- "' 03892 0008397 01 1 47 2 O0 NATL METALS COATING CORP DEER PK T 000,000 000.003 00031 0027995 01 2 61 2 0 NEPCO TERMINAL CORP BROOKLYN 000,000 000.000 03067 --0079430- -01'- I . 47---6- 0"NORTH ISLE GARDEN APTS CORAM V 000.115" 000.00.0' H . -- 03748 0076544 01 2 64 3 0 NY TELEPHONE CO STATEN ISLAND 000.001 000,000 S AS 03470 0075990 01 2 64 3 0 NY TELEPHONE CO STATEN ISLAND 000.001 000,000 S A8 03832 01'-2-' -'64'--2 -0- NYC MARINE L AVIA RICHMOND' 000,000-.000.000 00284 0079456 01 1 47 4 0 OAK HOLLOW NSG CT MIDDLE ISLAND V 000,052 000.000 HM S2 03814 0065439 01 1 47 6 0 OAKDALE SHORES SUBDIVISION ISLIP T 000.200 000.000 02716 0026174- D- 2-01 64 -1 O'-OAKWOOO BEACH NYC' OWR ........015.000 016,000 -'N'- 0Q3 E' P- 00057 0020168 01 1 47 1. 0 OCEAN BEACH V ....000.500 000.324 N 1 GQ 00005 0027936 01 1 47 2 0 OLIN WARNER DUCK FARM CLAVERTON V 000G000 000O000 0 P 03785 02/05/76 NYS DEPARTMENT OF EW- IONMENTAL CONSERVATION E IZ6 DIVISION Oh~PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOURCE DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN# PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER- RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. AREA RES CNTYC B NAME ' LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO* -----------------------r_ ----------------------------- - - "" - - .--- --- - - "- -----" - - 0026166 01 2 61 1 0 OWLS HEAU NYC OWR 160.000 000.000 N 03 a P 00255 0075671 01 1 47 Z 0 P R B METAL PRODUCTS INC BABYLON V 000 001 I000000 tooa0 -M P 0011,1 0022209 01 1 47 6 0 -PARK AVE APTS BABYLON T 000.035 000.000 N A4 0 00149' 0065358 01 1 47 6 0 PARKLAND STP ISLIP T.000.265 000.000 S 030 . 02124 0080543 01 1 47 6 0 PARR VILLAGE SHIRLEY V 000.450 000.000 - 03 03872 0080454 01 1 47 4 0 PATCHOGUk NSG CENTER PATCHOGUE V 000.030 000.000 M A8 B 03871 6023922_01' 1_ _i_471 0 ..PATCHOGUE V 50 SO 000.350 - 000.27SN 02 0 00108 0075663 01 1 47 2 0 PEERLESS PHOTO PRODOS SHOREEMAM V 000.002 000.00 0 4 140 _ p 03509 0075922 DI 1 47 2 0 PERFECT LINE HFG LINDENHURST V 000.000 000.000 M MO P 00122 ---0077305 01 1. 47 4 0 PILGRIM PSYCH CT WEST BRENTWOOD V 002.400 000.,000 #4 0 03733 I - C 0079405 01 1 47 6 0 PINE HILLS COMM STP BROOKHAVEN T a 000.181 000.000 A 013 03557 0 0081612 01 1 47 2 0 PIPER PLASTICS CORP COPIAGUE V -000.002 000.00 M MDO 03742 0074691 01 1i 7 . 0 PLESSY INCORPORATED MELVILLE V 000.004 000.000 # MO P 03079 0008117 01 I 47 4 0 PLUM ISLAND LAB GREENPORT V 002.600 000.000- N 01 0 02898' 0008109 . 01 2 63 2 0 PONYA JFK INTERNATL AIRPORT QUEENS 000.381 000a000 N X4 ' Q p 00250 -.0r 02610 O 7 0-B1 1-_~2 846d'I 1 0 PORI 'RICHOND NYCIDW ' Ho6 ONO 060 000 0 0 003 0 P O a029 ' -007S531 01 1 47 2 0 PRECISION GRAPHICS INC FARMINODALE - 000*000 000.0008M -.t4-0 o - P -- 00124' 0078255 01 1 47 2 0 PREFERREG PLATING INC FARMINGDALE 000.000 0000.000 .- No 03555 * -.0075540--F--71 .. 47 O-PRINTEX rL-ECTRONICS'INCc BABYLON-t - o000,00 0o 00,000 MDo -- 00132- 0005771 01 2 64 2 0 PROCTOR & GAMBLE STATEN ISLAND '000.199._000.000 N #4 - E P 00309 - 0075841 01 1 47 2 0 PROOUCTN SPRAYING MFG CO DEER PK T 000.004 000.00 0 # MO 00134 0012958 01 2 64 4 0 PUBLIC S6WGOOL'3 PLEASANT PLAINSiY-_ 000O.00 1- 00.000 S __ A3 02877. 01 2 61 2 0 PUERTO RICO STEEL BROOKLYN 000. 0000000 - 00303----_ 0075566 01 1 47 2 00 C CIRCUITS BAY SHORE V 000.050 000.00 0 M MO: P 00036 NYS DEPART'ENT OF F ONMENTAL CONSERVATION . 121 OIVIS1O0 PPURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE S6-.iCE DISCHARGE INVENTORY ______-" REPORT BY BASIN* PLANNING AREA AND NAME'- - 17 -----------------------r---------------r-------------~---,------------------------------- PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG SIR EPA SMP SEQ, NO. "- AREA REG CNTY C B NAME &-LOCATION . FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT' RPT INF- NO, ----------------------- -----------------~----~--------I--~-------------------------- 0065S3T - 01 1-47 _2 0 - R F INTERONICS INC BAYSHORE V' 000.008 000.000 H HO - 03873 0075710 01 1 47 2 0 RANGER MEiG CORP FARMINGDALE V 000.001 000.000 M14 56 03519 0027952 01 I 47 2 0 RAYMOND POWLL DUCK FM SOUTHAMPTON V 000.050 0 0 0 . 0 00 P 00021 ____ - 0o1 l- 47 2--O'REPUBLIC AVIATION CORP BABYLON T000.000 000.000 P 00103 0080497 01 1 47 4 0 RIDGE HAVEN ESTATES SIP RIDGE V -.000.200 000.000 H GI 03911 0079391 01 1 47 6 0 RIDGE V STP 000.050 000.000 H S2 *03822 008452201 47 2 0 RINGLER-DORIN INC FARMINGDALE V-'-- 000.001' 000.000'-HS 03915 0020061' 01 1 471 0 RIVERHEAQ SD RIVERHEAD I *, - 001.200 000.600 N G1 E P 00028 *. 0007145 OL 2 64 2 0 ROAD MATaRIALS CORP STATEN ISLAND 000.053 000.000 . N MO E 00280 00262210 D2I- 63 ..0 ROCKAWAY WWTP NYC DWR' 045.000-000.000 N 2-- -.' E--_--- 00283 - 0065382 01 1 47 6 0 ROCKY POINT GARDEN APIS BROOKHAVEN 000.030 '000.000 S A8 02747 0004928 01 1 47 2 0 ROE INTERNATIONAL INC PATCHOGUE V 000,010 000.009 N 02 E 00141 007T4610 1 -1-47-6-0 ROLLING HILLS APIS HAUPPAUGE V 000.163 OO.000' MQ2 0077275 01 I 47 4 0 ROSS NURSING HOME BRENTWOOD V 000.018 000.000 H 1 A 03716 0078221 01 1 47 2 0 RSM ELECTRON POWER INC DEER PARK V 000.000 000.000 M HO P 03502 -- -- -01 2 64~~0 -' 2 '~ DS I H T HI~nMOD ~'RICHMOND 000 00.00 00287 00_ 591_ 01 1 47 2 _ S H FRANK & CO INC BROOKHAVEN T 000.071 000.000 14 HO 03053 0028908 01 1 47 1 0 SAG HARBOR V 000.100 000.000 N XX A P- 00050 ---0079324-- 01 I 47 6 0 - SELOEN SANITARY CORP CORAM V Y 001.300 000.00 0 - H - 03 ' - 03861 0074705 Ol 1 47 2 0 SEN-DURE PRODUCTS INC ISLIP T' 000.000 000.000 M HO P 02983 ) 0076252 01 1 28 6 0 SERVO CORR OF AMERICA HICKSVILLE V 000.000 O0.000 H HO p 00063 0006131-- 01 Z-- 61 -- 20 SHELL OIL CO BROOKLYN . -. 000.000 000 000 0 N 0 1F- 00278 0006190 01 1 28 2 0 SHELL OIL CO INWOOD V 000.000 000.000 N (01 00018 0021814 01 1 47 1 0 SHELTER ISLAND HGTS SHELTER ISLAND 000.030 000.000 N S6 E 00244 * NYS DEPARTMENT OF L-'!ViONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE. 128 DIVSIO I-PURE WATERSAV SURFACE WASTE SL,'E DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN, PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 Q f~~~~~~~~~~~~~-------------------------- ---,----~----------------------- -------- ____ ___ DLNG _ _ f~_ T___~__~~~~_~~.OESIGN ACTUAL .TPER TPTO STR T EPA SMP SEa. NO. AREA REG CNTY C H NAME L LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT HPT INF NO. - ---------------------- ----^--~--------~------------ -------------------------------------- * 0005975 01 147 2 0. SHELTER ISLAND OYSTER GREENPORT V 03985 ol_0 147 2 0 SHOREWOOD PACKAGING CORP BABYLON T 000'*000 000.000 00010 0085804 01 1 47 Z 0 SHOREWOOD PACKAGING CORP BABYLON T 0o00.000 000,000 s HO X 04169 * 002807001 1 47 2 9SHUBERT BUCK FARM RIVERRHEAO . p 03618 01 1 47 2 9 SHUBERT DUCK FARM RIVERHEAD . ..-. . P---- 03619 0080446 01 1 47 6 0 SMITH HAVEN MALL LAKE GROVE V 000.120 000.000 M 03. 03864 0015779 01 1 4700SOLIo POWER CORP FARMINGDALE V 0 001."000,00.000 M'O .03437 0074250 - I01 .147 6 0 SOMERSET WOODSS ASSOCIN BABYUON V 000. 0 71 000.0004 -A5S 03461 - 0077267 01 1 47 6 0 SOUTH SHORE HALL INC BAY SHORE V 000.24.0' 000.009 N G1 403718 0065374 01 1 47' 4 0 SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL.SOUTHAMPTON -Y 000.105-000.000 '--S'-i 01 02762 007744501 1 47 1 a 0 SOUTHAMPTON T SCAVENGER WWTP 000.050_-000.000 H AT L 03763 0075736 01 .1 47 2 0 SOUTHERN CONTAINER CORP DEER PK V 000.002 000.009 14 MO 03524 0026140 012 61 10 SPRING CHEEK WWTP-NYC OWR -- 010.000 - o 000.0004-o- -o2E P 00256 0027804 01 1 47 2 9 SPRINGWATER DUCK FARM SOUTHAMPTON T 000.030 000.000 x P__ 00061 01 1 47 2 0 SPRUNG MONUMENTS BABYLON r 000.000 000.000 00065 0007234,01 o 2 64 --2- 0 STANDARO TCHEMICAL-RICHl1OND o00oo000 0ooO8TN - 00286 * _____fjoTriU6 s 1_ _4?_4 _ 0 4 STATE U AU . TEC COL FARMINGDALEV * 000.300 000.000 M 1 'A5 ______ 03525 0086061 01 *1 47 2 0 STAVER CO INC BAY SHORE V 000.003 000.000 H S5 00175 0086029 01 - l 1 05T 3-EETREBEL A RLAUNDRYOUOUTHAMPTON-T 000.0000-600.000-H -MO 03909 00074041 01 2 __61 2 0 SUCREST CORP BROOKLYN 000.000 010..16 N M MO 0. P 00257 01 1 47 2 0 SUFF CO MICROFILMG CTR RIVERHEAO T 000.0000 000.000 . 00016 0078131 01 1 47 4 0 SUFFOLK CO COM COLLEGE RIVERMEADoV'1 000.035000.000 _' - 03842 0079481 01 ___ 1 47 4 P SUFFOLK CO COMMCOLLEGE SELDON V --- 000.151 000.000 14 02 02936 0068071 01 1 47 6 0 SUFFOLK DEVELOPMENT CT HUNTINGTON T 000.220 000.000 H 02 . 02764 NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVI ENTAL CONSERVATION P# 12 DIVISION' -POE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOUZ' DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINt PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 � - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - --- ---- � ---- - ----------- ____PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. -_AREA' REG CNTY C B NAME & LOCATION . FLOW FLOW -CAT CYCL _CAT RPT INF NO. -------------- ------------ ~ ----------------------+-------,----,,,,,,,,------'-------------------------------- 0081647T 01 '' 1I 47 -Z - 0 -SUFFOLK METAL FINISHING HOLBROOK V '000.001 000.000 m XX 00015 0006726 01 1 47 2 0 SUFFOLK MILK PROC LINDENHURST V. 000.025 000. 00 N S4 A P 00027 0084506 01 1 47 2 .0 SUFFOLK PROCESSING LINDENHURST V` 000.127 000.000 S 56 03882 1007824T--I -. _ I 471 60 -'SUFFOLK SANITARY CORP BROOKHAVEN 'T0006.360 00O.000 M 02 03796 a0028169 ol 2 61 2 0 SUN OIL 00 BROOKLYN (1000.00 0 000,000 . 00270 0008273 01 1 28 Z 0 SUN OIL 00 OCEANSIDE V 000.003 000.000 N 01 00025 0027871 - 01.1 47 2 9 SUNRISE DUCK FARM RIVERHEAD T' OOO I500 O.O00X~-p 00052 01 1 47 2 9 SUNRISE DUCKFARM RIVERHEAD T P 03609 0077259 01 1 47 6 0 SUNRISE GARDEN APTS BOHEMIA V 000.a120 000.000 H 03 03701 t~j 00278800 ~ 91- 1`-r' -:' 47 -2 9 SWIFT STREAM DUCK FARM BROOKHAVEN' T'_O000.100 ,O0O.000O-_'X X_ P-00051 U.)- 01 1 47 2 9 SWIFT STREAM DUCK FARM BROOKHAVENT 000.100 . . - -I p 03634 0015612 01 1 47 0 i 0 T & S METAL FINISHING DEER PARK V 000.002 000.000 m MO P 03774 --00936T- 01 47-- 6 0 TALL OAKS GARDEN APTS SELDEN V 000.060 000.000 M N S- 03815 01 1 47 3 0 TAURUS LAUNDERETTE ISLIP T 000. 00 0 000.00 -. . 00085 01 1 47 2 0 TELKA METAL PROD INC W ISLIP V 0on0.000 000.ODQ . 00168 OI_----2 -6I-Z-0-TERRM NAL ASSOCIATES BROOKLYN 000.0a0 0 00258 ____ O0006327 01. . 2 60 2 0 TEXACO INC BRONX 0 0 0. o0o00 00.o0 0 N 01 E - 00176 0006301 01 2 61 2 0 TEXACO INC BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N 01 E 00264 000682 T 0 IT1-2-B2 '_0__'TEXACO INO INWOOD'V 000.000'-' 000'000N 0Q1__ E 00173- 0075965 01 -2- 64 -2 0 TEXAS EASTERN CRYOGENICS INC NYC - 000.001 000.000 5 AS 03518 0085791 01 1 47 2 0 THOMPSON AIRCRAFT TIRE BRENTWOOD V 000.002 000.000. 4 S4 03889 - . r 012 - 61' 20~~ZI6 ' -_THRIFTY PAPER BROOKLYN-----~ 000.000 a 000.oo0 _ - - 00272 00717241 01 1 47 6 0. TOWNE HOUSE VILLAGE HAUPPAWGE V 000.040 000.00 0 1 AT - - - 03717 0015574 01 1 47 2 0 TRONIC PLATING CO FARMINGDALE V 000a.005 000.00 0 m MO P 00177 NYS OEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE 130 DIVISION PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SO--,Z.E DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN, PLANNING AREA ANO NAME 0 17 -J: --------------------------------------, ------ --------------------------- PERMIT PLNG T T ------------- ------- �7. _ DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. AREA REG CNTY- C8 NAME L LOCATION FLLOW F CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO. ------------------------------------------------------------------------t----------~------,,,,,,,, 0078239 01 1 47 2 0 TRYG PHOTOGRAPHERS LTO BABYLON T__ 000.008 000.00 H MO 03528 0026212 01 2 61 I 1 0 TWENTY-SIkTH WARD WWTP NYC OWR 0850000 070.100 N 02 E_ P _ 00290 3'-: 0006S99 01 2 64 2 0 US GYPSUM STATEN ISLAND 001 000 000.00 N MO 'E 0 00320 '0081582 - 01 1 47 .2 0 'UNEXCELLED CASTINGS Cd HAUPPAUGE-V oo 000.012"'0 UOOOO. M Si - .. -. 0079529 01 1 47 6 0 UNIVERSITY GARDEN APT BROOKHAVEN T 000.100 000.000 H S2 0:17S 0024023 01 2 63 4 0 US COAST OUARD AMBROSE 000.001 000.000 N XX E 02783 I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 -8 * _00'24546 01 2_ 64 4 0 US COAST OUARD NEW YORK'HARBOR : 020.018 DI (O2 ~I - 0024376 01 2 64 4 0 US COAST (IUARD ST GEORGE 000.000 000.000 N XX 02945 0024911 01. 2 61 4 0US NAVY FLOYD BENNETT FIELD BROOKLY 000.400 000.0 00 N 03' E 0?789 006533FT01_f_47 _6_ 0 VALLEY FORGE HOBILE HOME PKISLIP 000O053__00.0007oM SS 0008435 01 V1 28 2VALLEY FORGE PROD INWOOD V 000.000 'O00.000 *N S s 00624 0085821 DI 1 47 20V AN B UREN AUTO PRODUCTS MEOFORO V 000.0 01 000.000 H 5s 0389! 0084883 011 47 2 0 VANGUARD EXTRUDERS FARMINGOALE V ---o00.00.0 0.00. 56 03821 0 28215 01 _1 .47 _ 2 9 VICTOR KOSTUK DUCK FARM EASTPORT � X P 03616 01 1 47 2 9 VICTOR KOSTUK DUCK FARM EASTPORT P 03617 0036927 01 1 75 4 5 -VIGLIOTTA DUCK FARM BRKHAVN T NORTH-000.176 000.090 X . P 00112 _0-2260 01 *1 .47 *0 -- 9VIGLIOTTA DUCK FM E MORICHES EAST 000.060 000.000x . P__ 00180 01 1 4I 2 9 VIGLIOTTA DUCK FM E MQRICHES EAST 000.060 P; 03613 0027278 01 1I 4 2 9 VIGLIOTTA DUCK FM'E MORICHES WEST' P ---- _ 03614 01 _ 1 _~~ 4f~~~2~ 9 VIGLIOTTA DUCK FM E HORICHES WEST P 03615 0075639 01 1 47 2 0 VINYL MASTERS INC BABYLON T 000.003 000.000 H S6 03056 0085481 01 1 47 2 -0 'WALL-MATET-.VINYLS INC CORAM V' 000*002- 000.000 M S4 --' 03893 0026859 01 1_ 28 _1 0 WANTAGH $0 HEMsTEAD T,*, ____ 045.000 00O.000 N '01 P 02844 0075931 01 1 47 2 0 WASH BUCKET rNC CORAM V 000.00 a 000.00 H MO - 03069 NYS DEPARTMENT Of El" VO MENTAL CONSERVATION 131 DIVISION '-PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOU,.E DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY HASINt PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 - ---------------------------------------- PERMIT. PLNG V T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. _- AREA REG CNTY C 8 NAME 6 LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL. - CAT RPT INF NO, -------------------------- -------------------------------- 0080730 0 1 I47 '6 0 WATERGATE APARTMENTS PATCHOGUE V 000.023 000.000 M A9 03866 0077381 01 I1. 47 6 0 WAVERLY PK HOMES HOLTSVILLE V 000.025 000.000 SI 0344 S 0023523 01 1 28 1 0 WEST LONG BEACH SD ATLANTIC BEACH 001.500 . 000.000 N 02 a P 00174 00 77411 0 1 -I 47 6 0 ' WINDBROOKE HOMES CENTRAL ISLIP V 000.095'- 0 0 00.00 0 M S 6 03705**. 0077364 01 1 47 6. 0 WOLF HILL ASSOCIATES BAYPORT V 000.118 000.000 H 03 03704 0075817 01 1 47 2 0 WOODBINE PRODUCTS INC DEER PARK V 000.000 000.00 0 0 140 P 00160 00681440--l I1 474 .0 WOODHAVEN MANOR NURSING HOME BROKM- 0006070- 000.000 __._ S1i 02810"' 0076988 01 1 47 0 0 WOODSIDE SITES STP BELLPORT V 000.303 000.000 14 03 03554 0085693 01 1 47 1 0 YAPHANK CNTY CT WWTP YAPHANK V 000*250 000.000 1 03 04039 007436S_01_--47T3---0- YARDARM CLUB HOTEL'SOUTHAMPTON 'T 0.046 "000.000 "H-A5 03468". -- t v, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. -. -. - 0077232 - 01 1I 47' 6 0 10a TOWNE HOUSE VIL HAUPPAUGUE V - 000.043 000.00014 A9 03910. 02 2 63 2 0 AIHRASIVE BLAST QUEENS 000.000 000I000 00325 00056 80-02 2-2 6o0'-2 -0 -'AMERADA MESS'CORP BRONX . 000.000 000.000-'--N 1I- 00327 0030872 02 1 28 2 0 AMERICAN OIL CO INWOOD V.-----. ......0C 0.000a 000. a 000.00207 0004634 CZ 3 55 2 0 AMERICAN OIL CO MOUNT VERNON 000.003 0006000 N 01 00818 8 l a A ;ti=8~ *-- : bti= 2 AMPHitAN6L6 f BL -C MfV VERNONL.0" '0 00.000N 1 0 00812 .-- 0004596- 02 2 61 2 0 AMERICAN OIL CORP BROOKLYN -.---O 000.000 000.000 N 01 00326 0076261 02 1 28 2 0 AMPEREX ELECTRONIC CORP HZCKSVILLE 000.000 a00.000 1 MD1 P 03018 -0008443-02' 2- 61--2 0AM'-STAR CORP BROOKLYN- 0- 0a IO.00 0 009.270""-- N "' MO P 00324 0081698 02 1 47 2 0 ARKAY PACKAGING CORP HAUPPAUGE V. 000.003 000.000 M4 MO' P 00205 0032255 02 3 55 3 0 ARMONK POLLUTION CONTROL ARMONK V 000.081 000.000 N 52 03736 02 1I 47-2 '0 AUSTIN 1NSTRUMENT INC HUNTINGTON T_- 00o.00 0 0�0.oO . * -.-0 00210 0081566 02 1 47 2- 0 AUTOMATIC CONNECTOR INC COMMACK V 000.008 000O000 1 140 03729 0005045 02 1 28 2 0 8 P OIL CORP GREAT NECK V 000.000 000.000 N 01 . 00186 02/05/lA NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE. 132 DIVISIO' F PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE if,-,CE DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINc PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 ------------------------ --------------------------------------~---tT----------------------,-------------- ---- -PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ, ' NO. AREA REGCNTSfC NAME - LOCATION- FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT' INF NO. 5 ------------------ - ---~-------~--------------------~-------------------------------- 0005274 0? 3a55 2 .08 P OIL CORP MOUNT VERNOND 00o. 00f0oo 'oo 0 01 00820 0026841 0 _ o 1 28 1 0 BELGRAVE SO N HEMPSTEAO T . 0 02.000 001.34 0 N GI E.0019 02 1 47 2 0 BIELER NATIONAL IND INC ISLIP T 000.000 000.000 00189 001029702 1 47 .4. 0 BIRCHWOOD NSG HOME HUNTINGTON T 000.039 000 000H 'H"*AN 02906e 0026119 02 3 55 1I0 BLIND BROOK WWTP RYE_ C ,_005.000 000.000 N 02 P 00815 02 2 61 2 0 BOHACK CORP BROOKLYN 0 00.000 0a00,000 00369 0026158 02 2 63 BOBWERY BAY NYC OWR goo-N P._ 0 0 03 608 0068411 0;! 1 47 4 0 CARILLON NURSING HOME HUNTINGTON 1 0004030 000.000 S'', 02543 0022675 02 2 62 2 0 CERTIFIED IND NEW YORK 000.000 000,000 00372 .0022667 026 2 6CrTIFI CERINOJST'jSTIROEQLNT 008.000000.000 00379 (F_0047650 O Z 2 __60 2 O CIRILLO BROS BRONX 000.000 _000.000 N 01 00365 0076163 02 1 28 2 0 CLAREMONT POLYCHEM OLD BETHPAGE .V 0 000.000 000a000 H MO P 03076 0076279 02 1_-28__2 0 COCA COLA BOTTLNGtOEdfCHO*V 000.03200.000M MO ra 03897 00268? r02 1 47 4 0 COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB HUNTINGTON T"000.0000 -000.00 0 7 N 03 E 02544 0004782 02 2 60 2 0 COLONIAL SAND . STONE BRONX ' 000.000 000.009 N 02 00375 0004774 02 2 .60 0 COLONIAL SAND 4 STONE BRONX 000.000 00383 _ 0004707 0o 2 61 2 0 COLONIAL SAND & STONE BROOKLYN . ...000.000 , 000 0 9 N S6 . 02576 0,004812 02 1 28 2 0 COLONIAL $AND & STONE PT WASH V . 03975 0004731 02 1 28 2 0 COLONIAL SANO&STONE PRT WASHINdTO - 0000 00 0a0 0 N S -. 00190 0007854 02 2 63 2 0 COLONNA 4 CO INC LONG ISLAND C04006 0081680 02 1 47 2 0 COLORPAK MINEOLA MFG CO HAUPPAUGE V 000.001 *000.000 H St 03757 0076180 02 1 28 2 0 COLUMBIA CONTAINER CORP SYOS ET MO 00008000 H MO 03505 0005878 02 1 28 2 0 COMMANOER TERMINALS CO OYSTER BAY T s000000O 000.000 N GI 00 0075825 02 1 47 2 0 COMMUNICATION ASSOC INC HUNTINGTON 000.a00 000,000 H NO ' P 02994 NYS DEPARtMEtr OF ENV ENTAL CONSERVATION 133. 32/05/7 O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IVISION _4133. SURFACE WASTE 50U.._ DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINt PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 ------------------------------ -------- a+-----------~----I-------------------------------------------- 17MI .* N - -- - ____---.--...-,,,,,,,,,, PERMIT 'PNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SHP SEQ. NO. - AREA REG-- CNTY - C ' 8 NAME L 'LOCATION -. - FLOW - FLOW -_ CAT CYCL"'CAT RPT INF NO. ------------I-----------C----------------- --~----f--~------------------------------------------- 0075485 02 1 47 2 0 COMPUTER CIRCUITS INC SMITHTOWN T 000.000 000.00 0 H HO P 00197 0015876 02 1 47 2 0 COMTECH LABORATORIES SMITHTOWN T a 000.000 000.000 H HO P 03058 0007340 02 2 63 2 0 CON EDISON ASTORIA GEN STATION 641.000 000.000 N mO P 00342 0005116 02 __632-'0 -CON EDISON ASTORIA GEN STATI0N`' 0000 000.000 N HO P 00382 00 05 142 02 2 60 2 0 -CON EDISON BRONX 000 000 000.000 0 00353 0005126 02 2 62 2 0 CON EDISON EAST RIVER NEW YORK 000.000 000.000 N HO P 00347 r00 0 15 --- 02_ 2 61 2 O__ CON EDISON HUDSON AVE BROOKLYN --- -000.000- 000 0 0 0TN --- -- MOH0- ---- P- 00384 0 0005215 022 62 2 0 CON EDISON KIPS BAY NEW YORK . 000.120 000.000 N M O P 00380 0005193 02 2 63 2 0 CON EDISON RAVENSWOOD 000.000 000.000 N MO P 00381 000510 0 02- 2 62 2.0 CON EDISON STATEN-'ISLAND) ---- -- -00 0 0 O0 0 _-654. 10 o N HMO P 00373T3 0005 207 02 2 62 2 0 CON EDISON WATERSIDE NEW YORK 0 00.0 00 000.000 N MHO P 00351 0005134 02 2 62 2 0 CON EDISON 59 ST MANHATTAN 000.000 000.009 N MO P 00366 0 0 0 51-.7r---- 02-- 2'- 62-- 2 0 - CON EDISON 74 ST MANHATTAN OOO.o000" 000.000_-N_'__' MO- P 0 0O374 *--'-0028495 02 1 28 2 0 CONCORD OIL INC INWOOD V__ _ V0004000 000.000 00199 0075591 02 1 47 2 0 DEUTCH RELAYS INC EAST NORTHPORT V 000.000 000.000 m MO P 0307a _000633502Z_ 1 - 282o' DIAGNOSTIO RESEARCH INCROSLYN'V___ _ ---------- 03q27, 0006980 02 2 61 2 0 DIAMOND SWAMROCK CORP BROOKLzYN 000.000 000.001 N - S2 00350 0007480 02 2 61 2 0 -DUVEEN 50AP CORP BROOKLYN 000.000 0 00.00 N 02 E 00294 -00 lsaaoO75906"4T2 0'_ DYNELL ELECTRONICS CO HUNTINGTON' T O00.OB O0-.0000. 14PH0 - 00204 0076937 02 1 47 2 0 E C SUMEREAU & SONS HUNTINGTON T 000.0000 0 000.000 M MO P 03515 0078701 02 3 55 3 0 ECHO BAY YACHT CLUB NEW ROCHELLE C 000.006 000.000 S A8 03755 O~ 007546 97OZL 1 ~_-47' O 27 - 0ELMONT MF.8 CORP SMITHTOWN T -' 000.o o 000.000'14" M0 _P_ o00200 0076996 02 1 47 2. 0 ESTEE LAUDER INC MELVILLE V 000.020 000.000 4 S6. 0- 03471 0005452 02. 2 63 2 0 EXXON CO UUEENS 000.000 000.000 N 01 . 00359 :2/05/7h, NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE 134 DIvISION' I PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SO,---E DISCHARGE'INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN, PLANNING AREA AND NAME ':3 ---------------------'---------~--------------------------------------------- -PERMIT PLNG .T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPT STR EPA SHP SEQ. NO. AREA REG CNTY C B . NAME & LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL 'CAT RPT INF NO, ---" '-----"-------' ~L----~---------------- ----------------7---------------------------- 0025682 02 3 55 2 0 EXXON CORR PELHAM MANOR V 000.000 000.000 a N G I 00829 0025828 02 147. 2 0. EXXON CORP PRT JEFFERSON V 000.000 000.000 N G1 _ 00188 0005631 02 2 61. 2 0 F M H SCHAEFER BREWING BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N 03 00341 0076155 O 102 128 2 0 FAIRCHILP INSTRUMENT SYOSSET V -. 0000.000 000.009 HM MO . . P 03017 0087874 02 2 60 .2 0 FERRIS PLACE CORP NEW YORK C 000.000 000.000 s- HO -' X 04045 0007641 02 2 61 2 0 FILTERED PETROLEUM CORP BROOKLYN 0 0 0.000 000.000 N G1 00345 0075787 02 . 1. 472 20 FLAIR HANUFACTING CORP SMITHTOWN T 000.000 000.00 m 56p 030575 0006505 02 3 55 2 0 FLINTKOTE CO WHITE'PLAINS'_C 03990 0025321 02 2 62 2 9 FRUEHAUF CORP MASPETH V X . 03667 ;.. ae0084361 02 2 63 2 9 FRUEHAUF OORPF MASPETH V 00.0 a1t 00 00 0 S MD 03668 022a 62 3 0 FULTON FISH HKT MANHATTAN 000.000 000a000 � . 00358 ) 0076198 02 1 28 2 0 GENERAL INSTRUMENT HICKSVILLE V 000.000 000.009 H MO P 03440 0028452 02 2 63 2 0 GETT Y OIL CO L I CITY QUEENS Oa a Oa a OOO -ooO 02618. OC06620 02 1 28 1 0. GLEN COVEC DPW STP 004.000 005.060 N G1 A P 00330 02 1 28 2 0 GOLDSTEIN MLP BAYVILLE V . 000.000 000,0a0 00217 0006246 022 63 2 0 G OOD HUMOR CORP QUEENS 0 000too00000 70 a0G1 :E 00332 0083313 0?2 3 55 2 0 GOTHAM CbEMICAL CO PORTCHESTER V 000,000 000.000 H HO __ _ 03903 0026999 .02 1 28 1 0 GREAT NECK SD GREAT NECK 002.700 002.560 N 02 a P 00216 0022128 02 1 28 1 O GREAT NECK V . 6005O 000'.991N "01 0GI 00331 0028002 OZ 2 63 2 0 GREATER NEW YORKTERMINAL ASTORIA' 000.000 000.000 0. 03068 0020079 02 1 47 1 0 GREENPORT V .000.500 000*323 N el E 00215 0005789 02 2 61 2 O GULF OILCO8HOOKLYN . .. 00.0 000.009 NOI 00311 0z 2 60 2 0 GULFOIL OORP BRONX 000.000 000.000 ..00338 0007463 02 1 28 2 0 HARBOR FUEL CO GLENWOOD V 00-0.000 000.009 N 01 00213 3 ~ ~ ~ - -~ - . . -- - - - - __ - - . . -- - - . - - - NYS DEPARTMENT OF EN71 5MENTAL CONSERVATIN. DIVISION ( URE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOURL-& DISCHARGE INVENTORY `REPDRT BY 8ASIN. PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 --------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----~---~--- PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER. RPTG STR EPA S)4P SEQ. NO. AREA REG' CNTY C B NAME & LOCATION --- FLOW FLOW "''CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO, ------------------------------------ l--------------------------------------- -------- 0026654 __OZ 2 60 I1 0 HART'S ISLAND WWTP NYC DWR_ 001.500 000.000 N 01 E P 03401 0066028 Oz 1 47 4 0 HAUPPAUGE COUNTY CENTER SMITHTOWN T 000.288 000.000 S 02 02653 0075752 02 1 47 2 0 HAZELTINE CORP GREENLAWN V 000.038 000.009 H HO P 00212 --- 0075744-- 02 -14 7 2 0 HAZELTINE CORP GREENLAWN V . 000.006 000.00 0 HM MO 03444 0084514 02 1 47 6 0 HEARTLAND IND PK STP HAUPPAUGE V 000.100 000.000 H 53 03870 0006343 02 2 63 2 0 HOROWITZ 8 MRGT QUEENS 000.000 000.000 00339 0021342' 02 I1.47"I 0 HUNTINGTON T 002.000 001.200-_ N 03. -'E'' P - 00211 0026191 02 2 60 1 0 HUNTS POINT WPCP NYC DWR 200.000 145.400 N __ 01 P 00335 0021237 02 3 55 2 0 IBM ARHONK 000.000 000.000 N SS -.E 02657 0 06'- 0602 3 55 2 . 0 '1WB WHITE PLAINS C - 000.000 *ooo..ooU .- - 1 00816' . - 0006114 02 3 55 2 0 IBM .WHITE PLAINS C 000.000 000.0090 N 55 02901 0007544 02 2 61 2 0 INTERBORO SURFACE CO BROOKLYN 000.200 000.000 D 00333 0008214a 1 02 4 0 2- 2 61 2 0 J P ELKINS INC BROOKLYN ,000.000 00001N S4 _- 00337 - 0026611 -02 3 55 6 0 JEFFERSON VALLEY CORP SHRUB OAK 000.150 000.000 N 02 00813 007628? 02 1 28 2 0 JOHN HASSALL INC WESTBURY V 000.000 000.000 H HO P 03G14 o0B86711'-0tr- 1 2- 2o~~K oLKOsL~1AN INSTRUMENY"CO SYOSETT-V----000.000 -00000V- H'-- MO P P 03180 `0007315 02 3 55 2 0 KRYSTINEL CORP PORT CHESTER T . 0 O 000.000 000.000 H 56 Q -- - 00805 0005941 02 1 47 2 0 L I LIGHTING CO NORTHPORT V 681.843 000.000 N MO e P 00220 0026344 OZ V 47 Z-70-1--I LIGHTING CO SHOREHAM 0 00. 00 0 000.000---N 'H M -- 03066 `0005894 02 1 228 R 0 L I LIGHTING GAS PLT GLENWO LANONG 000.000 00 0.000 N MO P 02957 0005916 02 1 28 2 0 L I LIGHTING GLENWOOD LANDING 176.200 000.000 N MO a P 00243 --O0 059 32 OiT I sflZ~1"0~~-`L- I 'LIGHTING PORT JEFFERSOf4- V37----375.400"-000*000tf-'N MO__Q P 00232 - 0075477 02 U~1 47 2. O LAMBDA ELECTRONICS CORP MELVILLE V 9000.000 000.000 M H MO* -- P 03507 - 0089656 0? 1I 47 2. 0 LAWRENCE AVIAT INO PT JEFFERSON V 000.014 000.000 S 53 00226 VYS OEPARrMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE 138 DIVISIONv' %PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOL6i, DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT bY BASIN- PLANNING AREA AND NAME -------------------- ------ ------------------- --~---------�----------------------------I PERMIT PLNG T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER 'RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. ' - ARt AREG-CNTY- C_ NAl--M--NAE i LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT-.,CYCL CAT RPT INF NO. ---------------------- -------------------------- ----------'--"----------'~"------------- Oooa?4*9 0.~2 --1~ -~ 28 -~ i! ~ .~ -2 0 I TUNGSTEN CORP GLEN COVE C .000.317 000000--7N MDO Q P 02670 0076228 02 1 28 2 0 LIBERTY 4bND FINISHING OYSTER BAY T 000.030 000.000 14 MO P 00042 0006165 02 2 .60 2 0 LORAL CORP BRONX 000.095 000.000 -N Al E 02669 02 1 47 2 0 H L T CHEMICAL INC HUNT'INGTON T 000.000 000.000 00223 0026701 02 3 55 1 0 MAMARONECK V SD a t e .000 016.90d 01 E N P _ 00809 02 2 63 2 0 MARLYN COIP LONG ISLAND CITY 000a000 000.009 00391 0075621~il--oz 07 1.0 4 MCPHHILBENLIGHITING MELV1ILE V 0D0 0,8 00 0.0 00 4 NHO P 030741 0016244 02 1 28 2 Ea METALLURGICAL PROCESSINGtYOSSET V- 7000.000 000.000 M MO0 P _ 03504 0076236 02 1 28 2 0 METATRONIO MFG CORP HICKSVILLE V 000.000 000a000 m MO0 P . 03439 0007663 02 '260-20 60 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUiIBRONX' 00 a. Oo a 00o.000 0039Z 0028312 02 2 60 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM BRONX . - 03490 0007676 02 2 61 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM CO BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N 01 00406 000768 4 02 2~ 63 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM CO FLUSHING 000..00 000.000 N 01 . 00403 0007106 02 1 28 2 0' METROPOLITAN PETROLEUM GREA1 NECK V 000.000 00oo.000 N 00222 0007692 02 3 55 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLM CO MT VERNON C 000.001 000.000 N 01 . 00811 002830402e 3 55 2 0 METROPOLITAN PETROLM MT VERNON C 03491 02 1 28 2 0 MOBIL OIL CO GLENWOOD LANDING 000.000 000.000 00231 0004995 02 2 61 2 0 MOBIL OIL CORP BROOKLYN 000.000 000.000 N a1 00405 0004944 02 3 55 2 0 MOBIL OIL CORP, MT VERNON C 00000-10 00.0 8 _______ 0076147. 02 1 28 2 a NARDA MIC14OWAVE CORP PLAINVIEW V 000.007 000.000 N HO 03829- 0076147 02 1 28 2 .0 NARDA M[CROWAVE INC PLAINVIEW V 000.000 000.000 P 03772 02 -1 28 2 0 NET REALTY GREAT NECK V 000.000 000.000 0 00230 0072281 02 a 62 3 0 NEW YORK PLAZA BLDG CO N Y C 052 000 000.000 S- M0" P 00400 0075515 02 1 47 2 0 'NEW YORK TWIST DRILL MELVILLE V 000.000 cO O000 N MO P . 03075 0YS DEPARTMENT 3; Et'"WNNENTAL CONSERVATION 7e ~~~~~~~~~DIVISION' PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOUN(.E DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASINf PLANNING AREA AND NAME.- 17 -------- -------------- --'---~--^---~---------~--------I----------------------------------- PERHIT PLNG. T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTO STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. -'AREA---REG--CNTY--C B NAME &-LOCATION'- FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO. )r----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0026204- 022'--61--'I ' -NEWTOWN- CK NYC DWR- . .'310400 _ 169.200- N 0 03 ' P 00003' 02 2 63 2 0 NEWTOWN REFINING CORP LONG ISLAND C 000.000 000.00. P 00263 0007421 02 1 28 2 0 NORTH HEMPSTEAD T ROSLYN HARBOUR v . 04000 7-0o2E81 028 7-- 1 U NORT-PORT V. -. 000.000 00O.150'_ N 03Q - 00242 02 2 63 2 0 NYC POULTRY H QUEENS 000.000 000.000 00395 0070106 02 1 47 -2 0 OAK TREE DAIRY INC E NORTHPORT V 000.080 000.000 H HD 03544 "02 -2--60-3 O-OCEANA TERMINALS BRONX 0 -000.000 000.000* � -.. -.-0 00401 -. 0026662 02 2 60 1 0 ORCHARD BEACH WWlTP NYC DWR - 000.250 000.000 N 01 E P 03402 0086031' 02 1 47 2 0 OWENS ILLINOIS INC COMMACK V 000.004 000.000 H M S4 03883 "; 0021822_02 1 2810DYSOYSTER BAY7'SDOOYSTER-'BAY-T0---- 001.200-00 1"230'-N----"al'-' -p----p- 00045 0005479- 02 2 63 ;? 0 PEARL WICK CORP LONG ISL C . 000.000 000.041 'N MO 14 0. 00300 0007323 02 3 55 2 0 PELHAM OIL CORP PELHAM MANOR V 000.000 000.000 N 01 00828 i ~~.-~..0034750~-2: . ~ ~62 2. O~-PENN CENTRAL TRANS CO NEW--YORKR0-000G000--00S-0-0 00348 - 0 004 9 10 02 2 6 3 2 - 0 PEPSI COLA CO LONG ISLAND CITY- 000.000 005.010 -- 0 -- IP a-. 00371 0022799 02 2 63 2 0 PHELPS DODGE REFINING MASPE3)H 000.000 000.000 N M HO, 00377 90052583,022 - 63 2-0-- PHELPS DOUGE-'RLrINING'MASPETH"' - ,oo -00000.50-o0 o -MO P 00378 0022781 02 2 263 2 __ 0 PHELPS DODGE REFINING NEW YORK - 0 02O OOo OOO.o -- 02894 1 0008133 02 2 63 2 0 PONYA LAGUAROIA AIRPORT QUEENS 001.185 000.000 N . X4 P 00356 002678 6 Q2) 55- Op-PORT CHESTER-P- 3 0O63000-000.00ON' t. P T0830 9 : 0026778 02 .1 28 -1 0 PORT WASHINGTON SD N HEMPSTEAD'T T_ 003.000 002.629 N - 03 - 0 --. P 00185 0006955 Di! 28 2 0 POWERS CbEM CO INC GLEN COVE T . 000.215. 000.000 N 01 P 00187 (O007455-OZ---2261 -0-PREMIUH COAC- f OI-cO 00361 - 0007447 02 2 63 2 0 PREMIUM COAL L OIL CO INC FLUSHING- 000.000 000.0000 N G01I 00344 0083216 02 3 55 3 0 RAMADA INN ARMONK V 000.001 000.000 H Ho 03884 NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PAGE 1J8 U IVISI06r i PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SG,.-E DISCHARGE INVENTORY REPORT BY BASIN& PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 - -----------------------------------------"""" ~"'---f ---- c---------- ------------------ PERMIT PLNG T T ---------- -----~~---L---'---_ -----� PERMIT PLNA -G TCY r -- -DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. NO. AREA 'REG _CNTY C EJ' NAME & LOCATION FLOW FLOW CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF 'No, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0085545 02 ~~-~1 47~ 0 "RAMBLER PUBLISHINGSMITt1T0W T H MO 0 000. 000-�--- 000, 000-- - 03875 -. 002!073 02 _ 61 1 0RED HOOK NYCDWR.0a 0,0 00 00.000.N XX _ P 00279 0016295 02 1 28 2 0 RONZONI FOODS CO INC HICKSVILLE V 000.026 000,000 H MO 03865 0085553 02 - 42 RO-CO TOOLS INC SMITHTOWtN T - 000.006 000.000 H S3 03869. 0022349 02 1 28 1 0 ROSLYN V - 0 00520 000.425 N-... __0 0 00235 - O 0007625 02 2 63 2 0 ROYAL PETROLEUM CO LONG ISLANO CITY 000a000 000.000 N GI 00346 0007633 '2 -S 55 - - 6-ROALPETROLEUM CO RP MOUNT VERNON C-_000.000, 000.000 o p GI 00822 0087360 0Oa 3 55 .0.._SENTINEL OIL C(.INC NEWIROCHELLE V 0004000 000.o g S MO 04037 . . 0081655 02 1 47 2 0 SEVEN-UP UKLYN BTTLN6 MELVILLE V 0000.008' 000.000 MO 00240 C 0006211 02 3055 a a 000o ogo-oo00 00825. 0075833 02 1 47 02oSMc MICROSYSTEMS 000.000 000a000 H MO P 03438 0o0S634 02 1 41 4 0 SMITHTOWN GEN HOSPITAL SMITHTOWN T 000.093 00.a000 S AB 02161 aoi4jji 02 -. 1 47 4 0- SMITHTOWN'NSG HOME SMITHTOWtTli 000.060 o.oo -. s__-_ 00229 0023311 02 1 47 1 0__SMITHTOWN T 001.000. 000.600 N G1 E P 00238 0074292 02 1 47 4 0ST JAMES NURSING HOME ST JAMES V 000.750 000.000 H 03 0 .03542 0074683 02 *1 -7 .. T4JHI'HT~6N DPSInol adbjoboo-~ 03462 -`-~ - -0 6746830 Z l~74-OST JOHN$* 'SMlTMT(WN_ S ~- M03PSMTH62iF~O~4 O.QM 0O0217O 02 1 47 1 0SUFFOLK CO SD I PORT JEFFRSON V 001.500 00I.2?4 N G I E P 00196 0070033 02 1 47 6 0 SUFFOLK CO SO 5 HUNTINGTON T 000.150 000.000 N 03 02638 0 007200 02_;2~--6jj_ 0 '_SUN COO-6 00397 0006891 02 3 55 2 0 SUN OIL CO PELHAM MANOR V 000.000 000000 -N 01 00824 * 0026239 02 2 63 1 0 TALLMANS ISLAND NYC OWR 08 0, 00 0 058,000 N 03 E P 00394 0006297 .02 2-61 2o'T TEXACO INC BROOKLYN[_'_00 389 0 0006319 02 1 28 2 0TEXACO* INC ROSLYN V 0 oo000.000 00*00 N GI 00233 0076309 02 1 28 2 0 TOO MANUFACTURING CO HICKSVILLE 000.00 0 0 00.0 00 H MO P- 03016 B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...~--- NYS DEPARTMENT OF F- INMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISIONkJ_ PURE WATERS SURFACE WASTE SOURCE DISCHARGE INVENTORY ~REPORT BY BASIN* PLANNING AREA AND NAME 17 ----------------------- �------------------------------------------------ _PERM IT __PLNG .T T DESIGN ACTUAL PER RPTG STR EPA SMP SEQ. No. AREA REG 'CNTY - C 8 - '--NAME CLOCATION - ---FLOW FLOW -. CAT CYCL CAT RPT INF NO.' ------------------------I-------------------------------------------- 0008028 __02 3 55 2'- 0 U S V PHARMACEUTICAL TUCKAHOE V.-----04012 [0P0326.8 02 1.28 -2 0 UNIVERSAL OIL GREAT NECK V 000.000 0 0 0. 000 00182 ) 0023388 02 2 63 4 0 US COAST GUARD EXECUTION ROCKS 00 0. a001 00 0 .0 00 N XX 02779 0024457~~~~~~~ 02 147 0 US COAST GUARD LITTLE GULL- 0006001 00 0. 0 00 _N '--"-X 0278 0 0024031 02 'I 47 4 0 US COAST SUARD RACE ROCK 00 0.0 01 000.000 N XX E 02781 0022276 02 2 60 4 0 US COAST GUARD TH-ROGS NECK 000.001 000.000 N xx E 00323 0069159-- 02 I-- '47- _O- VA HOSPITAL' HUNTINGTON 'T 0 00.2 00M------ 02 02T95__'_ 0006068 02 2 63 2 0 VAN IDERSTINE CD L I CITY QUEENS- 0 00).0 00 000.000 D . 02893 0076317 02 1 28 2 0 VEECO INSTRUMENT CO PLAINVIEW V 000.000 000.0000 M MO P 00162 0 026131- 02 -2 62 I 0 WARDS ISLAND WPCP NYC OWR___ -_265.000 258.000 N.-Q1. "-.:E P 010322 0020052 02 2 62 6 0 WATERSIDE HOUSING DEVEL NEW YORK'- 000. 0 00 - 0100.000 N AS a 02806 0075132 02 3 55 40 WESTCHESTER CNTY AIRPORT 000.000 000.0000 S MO 03887 0026697-0? -3 55'- 1 '*0 WESTCHESTER EFC NEW ROCHELLE ~WP05001~0~N1 EP 088__ 0 0 06416 02 2 63 2 0 WESTERN ELEC CO JAMAICA --. -..- 03988 a 0006360 02 3 55 2 0 WESTERN ELECTRIC CO YONKERS C 000.000 000.000 N SI 00806 003080021~~~~~4r 430 WHITE DEPT' STORE' HUNTINC.TON T- '-000.o4o-~Oo.o00_$4__AN 02811 .-02 1 -28 2 0 WINDSOR OIL GLEN COVE C 0000 0000 O .. 00103 _- -.. 19?-MFE8 UNICIPAL SvTsWa I NVENTORY-. 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 54 _,_____3a .NAME OF PLANT.. PORTRICHMON0 4m PLANT N40 11 %4.-TYPE eF PLANT C. ITY__________ 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN L LONr ISLANO SOUND 76--ENVIRONMIENTAL -REGION ~ r C LT~y__ 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT I 2 9._.COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE ____COMaI-ED 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES Ila.-..PLANT GRADE 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE ___lASSISTANT OPERATOR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1953 *13,.-YEAR. LATEST MAJOR IHPROVEMEm T. 1964 146 TRIBUTARY POPULATION 131000 A&__ODES5IGN FLOW (1005I OLGAL- iQOODO o 18. TREATMENT UNITS "i. ~~~~~RELIMINARY p.8rAE AT IO1AL~RSCREEN~ , GR tT-C8AM1tER.- PRIMARY SETTLING TAN-- MECH. SLUDGE COLL. TMTERMEDIATF SECONDARY TERTIARY--- CHLORINATION pOST CHLORINATION DZSPQSAL. Of..LI2U103 SI4EOLI SCHARG~L1O.AUREAICLAXrERS 19. SLUDGE HANOLrNG UNITS V P_____ fRELIMINARY: wOL(ING O D DIGESTION ANAEROdIC DIGESTION(SEpARATE DIGESTERS --DEWATER ING DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE To SEA 20 -STREAM TYPE T LO AL 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A _~._ R22.RECEIVING WATER - MILE PTI XILL VAN KUUL 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL ______ 24. ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS Og - 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUEO ON 6/ 50 26. OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 2T, ACTUAL FLON (MGD) 14*300 1 0 -P __~..2g, BASES FOR FLOW - ETEREU__ 29, ADEOUACY OF CHLORINATION INADEQUATE Q_.fYHYOKAULIC OVERLOAU YES 31. METERING SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT . OPERATIONAL RESULTS ---e------ -ERKIILIMITS- ____ INF.EFFLUENT. -_ PERCENTL.___I OLA-.SAHSAMLES NG/L LB/DAY NG/L 44G/L LB/OAT REM04AL TION U O ~ 8,. 0~0. 237. ~2254D2D.3 PLANT RECORD 0~~~~~~~ _________ ~~~~~19 2 .126.0 052 t-34.4 t T_ REC 0R 0 SET. S,* 106.3 5DOS. 52,4 OTHER AGENCY Po TOTAL _ __9,0 -_ 8*2_.. 97. ... .o.__ PLANT RECORD' No TOTAL 19.10 20.30 2421 c 0 o PLANT RECORD 0 ' GIVEN IN nL/L -~ill ~ -- 9' MlLE:PDINT STONEAREST..IENT$ CC- L-- .-- .- - - - _ -- E-1 - ---- .--- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.--~-- _ A9T3~2 -<-(FEBLN-UNICIPAL SsaW a.IKVENTORY- _- MAKE flFLOCALlTl NEK-TORK-C 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 58 o - - 3 HNAME OF PLANT. D - OAKNOU BEACH 4; PLANT NO. 12 -- 5,.-TYPE OF PLANT CITY o ~ - r6. DRAINAGE OASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN u LONs ISLAND SOUND ILENVIRONMENTAL REGION N.Y' -I-2 80 LOCAL HEALTH UNIT O - ___9mCOLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE_- SEPARATE 3oe SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES 1. -..._ . _ll PLANT GRADE Og j2. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE ti1.ASSISTANT DPERATDti 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1956 15. .YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEHEMTS 18. TRIdUTARY POPULATION 60000 1Z*-DESIGN FLOM (Do1S OFilIAL.) 050O- O1. TREATMENT UNITS PRIMARY hTNERi-EO1A. E 4101F3.EEDAERAlTION SECONDARY TERTIARY - CHLORINATION POST CHLORIN ATION DISPOSAL OF. LIQUIDS sH0RE DISCHARaEJAURE&kCZEATXRs 19. SLUDGE HArNOLING UNITS io ~.__.~~_____~_PRELIMINARY T H'j C K E I N G. DIGESTION ANAERObIr DIGESTZONCSEPARATE DIGESTERS DRYING UED DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIAL" INCL, SANITARy LANDFILL 10 tL-TREAX.TYPE. SP IQALA 21. STREAM CLASS SPEGIAL-A O 2t ___LZAI2RECEIVING AATER & MILE-PT,.* LOWE:R NEWIYOR{B4Y 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS __24, .ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIM4ITS 25. OPEHATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 10/ 1/54 R6.1OPERATING PERMIT E~A~jI~FON 27. ACTUAL FLON (MtO) 160010 -___2_BASES FOR FLO- ___ 0ETEKEU- 29, AODEUACY OF CHLQ,'NATION AOEq2UATE ' .J0.~~3mHYONAULIC VLQA__IE- j~ ~ 3 _HD ILI DVLRLfi LU 'Vu �eL _3 1. METERING - SEhAGiE FLO"d EFFLUENT ........... OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------------ 0ERMIT LIMIT3._ INFi __EFFLUENT -PERCENT _qIOLA-_SAMPLES HG/L LB/OAY Mi/L mG/L LB/OAY REMO.,AL 7NON Y 1050 45. 6004 5813 P LANT RECORD -~~ Sg~~t~ 123. 43.0 5 73L..6d5 ,t PLAnT..RECONO - - SET, 5'* 107.5 20.0 81.4 OTHLR AGENCY P' TOTAL 494 587__.33 O__ _ PLANT RECORD NO TOTAL 19,40 15#30 2041 21.0 PLANT RECORD t GIVEN IN ML/L _ *t.J(4ILE-POINT S TO -NEAREST -TENTri - - --------I- ---~ I- ~-- -%rr �-r -u ~-u lt-- -ICC �-4��-. -*UCII E-2 o .-_ __ __ ___ -_ _______________ 1 (fE) MUNICIPAL S#TtWo INVENTOR. J__ls AME .Of-LOCALITY J4NEW-YORK-C 2, COUNTY N Y CITY 58 31a- NAME OF PLANT W. ML.s HEAO_ 4. PLANT NO, v _._TYPE OF PLANT CITY O fg 6. DRAINAGE RASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN * LONG ISLAND SOUND 0 78 EtlIIRONmENTAL REGION N . Y.-.IC I-T- 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT 8 _ _ COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE_. 10. SIGNIrICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES ..11.- PLANT GRADE A - 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE I _ 13a-ASSISTANT UPERATOl.-, 14, YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1952 *.5. -YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS .16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 800000 -7-.-DESIGN FLOn (1003 .OF.-GALl 1600800 18. TREATMENT UNITS e - ~~~PRELIkINARY i ~~~~~PRI14ARY YNTERAEDIATE- XO lFIEOAEiRATIONI U N SECONDARY TERTIARY _ CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION .QISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS SHORPE01SLAfJE TQSM REATE. RS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS - -PRELIM INARY.- OLDIN(i DIGESTION ANAEROUIC DIGESTION:SEPARATE DIGESTERS - ________DEWATERING.T-SA DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA 2QL.STREAS TYPE TIDAL. 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A O t _~___22 .-RECEIVING WATER & mILE PT*_ __ UPPER NEWnQORXBAY 0 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL ___24. -ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS O 2r5 OPERATING PERMIT ISSUtD ON 10/ 6/48 26t OpERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 27. ACTUAL FLOW (MOD) 96.300 0 _ ____ 28,,- OASES FOR FLOW (ETEREU. 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION INAOEQUATE 30t-~_HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD Ro 31t METERING - SEWAGE FLOw EFFLUENT ........... OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------------ PERMIT. LIMITS _ INF _ EFFLUENT ___.ERCENT____vOILA-__SAmPLES XG/L LB/DAY MG/L Mr/L LB/DAY EXRMUAL TION UV 0 5.0,0. 137I. 62. 41979 62.7 PLANT RECORD S.SQ 132. 4ito 32926 P PLANT-RECORD SET. S.. 83, 12.4 8!.I UTHI.R AGENCY * *. PO TOTAL -5,8 5 55 --4417-___ 5t0 ---___ LAN TRECORD.________ NO TOTAL 24.00 17.40 13974 27.0 PLANT RECORD o * "~-o GIVEN IN ML/L OI _ _ _ _ _ _ __E_ _ _ ---TO -NEAREST TERw E-- 3 ~8~ ~� -- �5- �-- ---lI - r~a . ~ rLz- M ~-rCl tII4.P�aL ~ IL- - l2mO~ E-3 o - --~-~� I C W I-------__ W --CI * -lrl ____ __-U~ 1972 CFES) MUNICIPAL sqTin. INVENTORY jI"AHE.O-PLOCALI-11Y NEW-YUH-Ot-C0 2. COUNTY IN Y CITY 58 O ___ 3tNAHE OF. PLANT ENTUnCREE 4. PLANT NO. 13 s,-TYPE OF PLANT. _CITY o 6. DRAINAGE UASIN ATLANTIC OC AX - LON^, ISLAND SOUND ( ENVIRONMENTAL. REGIoN '.Y. C .Y7T 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT 0B __91_.CLLCEOTION SYSTEM TYPE-- eOXI�NEP 10, SIaNIFICANT INOUSTRIAL hASTES yES II1__PLANT GRADE o 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE I 13~.ASSISTANT OPERATON 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1967 O)_ 151YEAF4R LATEST MAJUR IMPHOVE-KENTS 16. TRIbUTARY POPULATION 1475000 *l ~ DESIGN FLOH 3100 .OFGAL.) 3100000 18. TREATMENT UNITS ( PRELIMINARY. -ARREEEL3ILCHAAaER PRIMARY INTERMEDIATE MO IEiDOAE-RATION' SECONDARY- TERTIARY-- CHLORINATION POST CHLORINAIION .DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS 9 liZ- I 5 C f4 S r~lT--S E .- C E-11 ERS 19. SLUDGE HANOLING UNITS -______ ~PRELIMINARY THICKENING, �L0ING- DIGESTION ANAEROuIC DIfE5TIONcSEpARATE DIGESTERS o DEMATERING DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA _ _20STREAR TYPE.- TJDAL. 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A O _ 22. RECEIVING WATER A NILE PT.�' EAST RIVER 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL * -_~__ 24. _ ADUITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS- 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 4/26- -26, OPERATING.PERNIT EXPIRES ON 27. ACTUAL FLOW (MGO) 169.200 23j_ BASES FOR FLOW PUMP OPERATIGW TIME 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE 30 t.-O_ HYDRAULIC 0VERLGAU.I Nn a A ETERING - SEAAGE FLOW EFFLUENT . OPERATIONAL RES'LTS O eL~~~~~~~_RHIT._ LI mI T5 _ INF._ EF FLUENT , E R CEZ._. I OL A- ___.AMF.LE_ NO/L LS/DAY MG/L %G/L - LS/DAY REMO.r-L TION 13 Oa I 0,100 201. Ss* 12179 56,1 P LANT RECORD 165 .__ 66.0 _ 9 3134 -6O &;t PLAwXT-..RECURUO SET, S.* 98.3 A4.7 5 4 OTHER AGENCY Pm TOTAL__ _ .5.6 3.3 _.. 4656 -_41i PLANT RECORD Na' TOTAL 36.50 16.00 22b7d 56 v: PLANT RECORD O ' GIVEN IN ML/L t I ----~-i' HILEPOINTS TO- EAREST.TENTH -----.-*--.-.-----.- *. ----- -. __ E -4 _19T 2 UFEB).MUNICIPAL S.t.Io INVENTORt JJ NAHEOfLDCAlJY Ew. _ O ~ 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 58 ____3,___NAME OF PLANT -WARDS ISLANOD 4. PLANT NO, 2 St - TYPE OF PLANT CITY DRAINAGE 8ASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN a LONG ISLAND SOUND _ _ ___HYIRONHENTAL REGION4 -C ftfi~ LOCAL HEALTH UNIT S T7__ ~~ P9,_COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPEI- CONNINED 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES Ils..._PLANT GRADE O 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE I __ _3ASSLSTANT OPERATOR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1937 _ _ 1,T~---EAR LATEST .AJDR IMPROVEMENT I 98a- .16.TRIBUTARY POPULATION 1250000 �i: ._.._~._-_.11.~ DESIGN FLOW tlOQS.QF_.GALol -1800000 18. TREATMENT UNITS P RELINHAR.I N A IREAERAA I N1 1 AR .REEC. ~GREE I tCHI CAbltR- PRIMARY SETTLING TAA&w MECH, SLUDGE COLL. SECONDARY ACTIVATED SLUDGE TERTIARY~ ij ~~~CHUORINATION OISPOSAL. OE.LIDU1OS SH0RLSQHARIDS~aEACL A1LRS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS 0 ~~~~PRELIMINARY DIGESTION DEWATERINQ-- DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA 20_ STREAN.-TYPE TIOAL .21, STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A 22, -RECEIViING WATER & MILE PT,*e EAST RIvER 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24#.. ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25, OPERATING PERHIT ISSUED ON .5/ 5/37 26 o OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRESOM 27. ACTUAL FLOW CNGO) 255.000 I 0 ~ ~25, _BASES FOR FLO'K -___ PUr4POPfERATION1 TIME 29. ADEOUACY OF CHLORINATION -30,__HYDRAULIC OVERLOAU D .Y 0 35,. METERING - SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ............. OPERATIONAL RESULTS --- -- -- O ' P __ERHIT-LIMITS _ INF# ____ EFFLQENT .-ERCEZAT __'IIoLAw_SAMPLES fQ/L LB/DAY MG/L HG/L LB/OAY REND-AL TION 13Y * 6.0.0a 140. 31. 66703 7 79 PLANT RECORD sea- t53 32 t 0-64 8 55.19t xQ_ R______P.LAN7__RECO SET. S. 116.3 15.0 87.1 OTHER AGENCY Fe- T..P OTAL- 40___ 3.O._ 6455._ ._25 TLANL-RECORD Me TOTAL 16,70 11.40 2qb29 3Is0 PLANT RECORD 0 GIVEN INNL_/L -�-- 1 *t NILE-PDINITS-TO1-EARESLTE- THA.. E-5 . --.-__i~~sP---.--~- ~~=----'-- C-'J~-LY�I~-� 1972 -(FEB)-MUNICIPAL .SalTN. INVENTORY - - NAME-OF-LOCALITY - EWAOftKXK- 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 58 8 - __ ,( NAME OF PLANT -RHERT' BAY f 4. PLANT NO. 4 5.TYPE OF PLANT CITY 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN * LONG ISLAND SOUND ( To ENVIRONMENTAL REGION a LY- 3. LOCAL HEALTH{ UNIT * C_ _OLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE comaINED 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL HASTES YES i �(a .11.-lIt* PLANT GRADE A * ~ 012. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 1 I _13..ASSISIANT OERATOL 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1939 15._~___ t rEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEHEN.T 958 16. TRIVUTARY POPULATION 637000 1Io-- DESIGN FLON (1006 OFGAL! 420000.0 o - .18 TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY PRE-AERATIC . qARSCREEHpGHIT _CK0U4F PRIMARY SETTLING TANA-u KECH, SLUDGE COLL, INTERtEOIEATF SECONDARY *. ACTIVATED SLUDGE TERTIARY- DISPOSAL OFLIPUIOS '1VRLDI lARGELSURFACLAIERs 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARt- tHICKENINGzi-HOLDING DIGESTION ANAEROBIC DIaESTION(SEpARATE DIGESTERS o -~~------*- DEdATRiNGOF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA ( 20, STREAHRTYPE.. TIOAL. 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIALmA O .__22. RHECEIVING HATER & M I E PF,* - EAST RIVER 23., PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24t- ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIHITS 25t OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 2da OPER.ATING PERMIT EXPINE5-Q.N 27. ACTUAL FLOW (MGOU) 103900 I 0 __28, A-ES FOR FLOW F pLj.p OPERATt0LI ( 29. AOEQUACY OF ChLORINATION INAoEQUATE 2 .... 30.i HYDRAULIC OVERLOAU 31. METERING - SENAGE FLOW EFFLUENT mm-a-m --- 0- OPERATIONAL RESULTS, ---------- - - ERXIT.LIH!TS.___ INF..___ _EFFLUENT ~.__PERCENT__l vOLASAMPLE. S... KG/L LB/DAY MG/L KG/L LB/DAY REMOAL TION by ___B O.O, 148. 54. 46792 63.5 PLANT RECORD. O-IE. 65.0 5 6 3 2 _6 5 a 3 _ _ELAN TRECORDH SET. S,* 81. 22.3 72.5 OTHER AGENCY Pa TOTAL __ 3 _ 5. 5O29 7,0.______ PLANT RECOR-_ No TOTAL 24.30 22.10 1915' 9 LANT RECUND qlGVEN IN ALC/L ,. ~. -~t _# LFOI1NTS.10-.NEARAEST-TENTH E-6 O .__ -� - --- --~- ~ ------- --- -___.__ -< V .1912 _CFEB .MUNICIPAL S.T.W, INYE*~OYR- II ~J+-- NAME-OF-LOCALITYY krOR:- 2. COUNTY N y CITY 58 _______ 3tNAHE OF PLANT IUNTS.YINT 40 PLANT NO, 9 ______rSTYPE OF PLANT I-..-- ______ 0 - 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LON', ISLANI SOUND ' 1.ENVIRONMENTAL REGION B. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT -- 9COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE__ COOKIN ED 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES yES ______ll*PLANT GRADE 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 1 ( 13#--AS51STANT OPERATOR-. l4. YEA R PL ANT CONSTRUCTED 1952 . .j5&__EAR.LATEST MAJORHRLVN~S 94 16* TRIWATRY POPULATION .70-3000 17.t-__I~r DES IG8 FLON CIOOS OF-GAL&I "(Q0000 1 t. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY FRE.1AERATlOtzARSCREEI{_GRLTXMA"JER PRIMARY SETTLING TANI- MECH4 SLUDGE COLL. I -TERMEDIATF It _ SECONDARY ACTIVATED SLUDlt TERTIARY CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIDS SHOOISCHA RE AC &1.ERS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS Pi)EELIHINARY THICKENING ,* .-MtDING f DIGESTION ANAEROBIC OIGl5ITI0NtiMHOQFF DEWATERING DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA -� 0 &_S 7 R E REA -TYPE TIDAL 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A _ -M-2cFRECEIVING HATER & MILE T______EAST RIVER 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24. AODITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS_ 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 10/24/AO 261--OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRESON 27. ACTUAL FLOW (NGDI 145.400 28. BASES FOR FLOi. RETEREO 29. ADEQJUACY OF CHLORINATION INAUEQUATE - -~301...__HY0RAULIC UVERLGAUQ RL - 0 31. METERING w SEAAGE FLON EFFLUENT ...Am ......... OPERATIONAL REkJM.S �----------- PERIT LIMITS. _. INF1 _-.EFFLUENT _. PERCE-iT._tIOLA-__.SAMFPLES HG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/DAY REMO.4~ TION BY 0 . ' o8.6D. 12?. 29. 35166 6 77. PLANT RECORD j iJT� 9~~~Z,.~ 1.O. Ai?5...RANT . RECUO _______ SET. s,, o ot 10.5 855*I(Z OTHER AGENCY PO TOTAL __ __. . 43 193 _LANT RECUHO _ _ NO TOTAL 16.60 13.10 15885 2 1 T PLANT RECORD G - 6IVEN IN ML/L -111 1.-- "*tHILLpOINTSS TQ.NEARE~S~_TTENTW b~~~~~~~~~o~~~- ----- -` - -I E- 7 - -**----* .~~_1972 (~FES) MUNICIPAL SaTi,w INVENtTORY 1~ NAME OFLCALI.TY o -~~~~ 2. COUNTY NLN NYCITY 58 4* PLANT NO, 5.TYEOF PLANT rIT 6# DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OcEAN aLONG. ISLAND SOUND f 1. ~~~_u EfV LRONMENTAL-REQION 7.Yi~! s. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT ?.-COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE._ ______CaMaINED 10, SIGNIEICANT INDUSTRIAL rmASTES YES 11 _PLANT GRADE - 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE llA3-ASSISTANT OPERATOR- 14. YEARi PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1939 ~ A5.YEARLATEST MAJOR IMPROVEHENXS ~1965- 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 39O000 - il, DESIGN FLU',1CIOO OFGAL.) 600000 O ~~18. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMIN{ARY -~RCEN.IUOGI~HiBR PRIMARY SETTLING TANw NECN. SLUUGE CULL. INTERMED! ATF *SECONDARY ACTIVATED SLUDGE CHLORINATION 0 ~Ps T Cicu 1INATom~ DISPOSAL UF. LIQUID-S S REU CAIQ RACA-ERs k~~~~) - ~~19. SLUDGE HANDLINCI UNITS P-R ELIN~I NARY DIGESTION ANAEROtilC UICE5TIMNSEpARATE IEER DISPOSAL UP SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA 29, STREAK4.TYPE 'TIDAL. 21. STREAM CLASS SpECIAL..A 0__~___22. RECEIVING 4ATER & MILE Pl~ttk EAST RIYER 23_ ___ _PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL ~~ 25. OPERATIONG PERFUTLMITISSUDO - 2~OPERATING PERMITE ISSUF ON 2?. ACTUAL FLOM ViGO) 586000 ._0 _28#_.ASES FOR FLOW PUMP OPERA-IION TImE 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE 30*_HYURAULIC OVERLOAU i 3.METE.RING - SE'dAGE FLOW EFFLUENT .. 20ERATl0?4AL.RE5;jLTS *-a ----------- - ERAIT. LIMITS ___INF&_,FFLUENT P~,CENT__vIULA-_SAMFLE5 XG/L LS/OAf MG/L 14G/L LB/UAY KrE-(]AL TION b Q - 8.0.0. ~~~~~ ~~~~~138. 18a 8706 8 7 %0 PLANT RECORD -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----5S 16_,2 3 so- 125-610. PLAATE CURO SET* 5,* 6 9.08 .1, t I6 OtHER AGENCY Po TOT A L - -637--~5.8 _ 2___ .-13.0- pLANT RECORQ he TOTAL ~~~24.70 19.07 0 9529 20,0 PLANT RECORD ' GI-V-EN N1-- -L/ L ---~~~-XILE PCINTS.-TO -NEAREST -TEI4TH-- - E~~~~~~~~~~~-8a 1972.. (FEB) MUNICIPAL SoTeW. INYENTORs A --NAME- F--L0 ALIT.Y P CHESTR -V 2. COUNTY TCN6TN 55 0 8 ~~_____NHAME OF PLANT PORT.CKESTE. At PLANT NO, 15 5,Tfi.-.SYPE OF PLANT, VILLAGE __ 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LONG ISLAND SOUND - T�7, ENVIROhRENTAL REGION REh -pALTYr-3- - 8l LOCAL HEAIAN UNIT '; WESTCHESTER COUNTY ..-_g9iCOLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE . - SEPARATE&SaEINED 10. SIrNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES It s11,- PLANT GRADE - - -a-- o 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 A3.L.ASSISTANT..OPERATOR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1964 ---o ---15i-YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMEN.TS 168 TRIUUTARY POPULATION 23000 I~r .DESIGN FLOW C100-S O.GAL. 50000 Lee TREATNENT UNI.TS t PBELIHINARY eARCHEENkCO1tINUTORLQRIT-jt8E PRIMARY SETTLINC TAN-S HECK. SLUDGE COLL. * ___________IRTERmEOIATE SECONDARY -TERTIAHY CHLORINATION BOTH PRE & POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIOS ..sHDQ4TFLsC Ri0JsURE&CL ATFRS 19m SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS 0 __ ______REIINR ?1ENLN~G DIGESTION DENATERING. O3~ - ~ DISPOSAL OF TLUoGE tO ANOTHER ST.Y. ___ 20. stREAITYPE_ IIDAL ' 021, STREAM CLASS C __.... _.22,. _~R E CEIJ V ING N ATER & MILE PJT,-** -1-y 4 _ARIVER 04 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL I 24,-ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERHIT ISSUED ON 9/29/59 ;65&VpEHAT.NG PERMIT EXP-IES,-N 27. ACTUAL FLuA (MGO) 4,400 -28t ._ -ASES FOR FLOW METERED 29. AOEgUACY OF CHLORINATION ATERUTED - *- 5t _.HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD __ 31. METERING a SENAGE FLOd EFFLUENT OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------------- 0 . ___________ERMIT LIMITS _ INF__ EFFLUENT PERCi01 T-VIOLA- SAMFPLEU KGA/ LB/DAY MIL AGIL -LB/UAY REMOD-XL TION BY O~ 8~s~,0,, 725.00 162, 6458 7 57 PLANT RECORO - S.- 2301 loop. .____ __ 6 5 PLAN-T-RECORO SET, S.* 10l0 0a2 980 PLANT RECORD o~ -P- TOTAL.- #4. TOTAL 0 GiVEN IN ML/L *---* Ji-nLL POI NTS. Ta. NEARE5~L1ENT~L. E-9 .1972 .FEB)~HUNIC1PAL ST.W. .INVEMTORT.... iLs AME OF-LOCALITY R YC 21 COUNTY WESTCHSTR 55 ....3a- NAME OF PLANT BLINDO 8RK STM____ 4. PLANT NO. '21 5. TYPE OF PLANT .* COUNTY DISTRICT OR O-INERSHIP 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LONI ISLAND SOUND Is EqVIRONMENTAL REGIOK NIEn. FACT-~1 ____ 8, LOCAL HEALTH UNIT WESTCHESTER COUNTy - 9-.-COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE _________SEPARATEA..CI4, INEO. 10, SIUNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES No -- - , PLANT GRADE 12.. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 *-.. ASSIS.IANT OPEHATRi- - 14,- 'ZE~ Y;PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1963 ____ 15, YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROYEMENT9 16. TRIRUTARY POPULATION 10000 - _ 1L DESIGN FLOW C 105. UF__GALm) 50000 18. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY -A--I-EEN.--MINUTOR-I tHa.z PRIMARY SETTLING TAN-j-, mKCH SLUDGE COLL, INTER-AEDIATE SECONDARY * -.--- TERTIARY-. CHLORINATION 80TH PRE t POST CHLORINATION DISPoSAL. DF.LIQUID- {DREULSCHAqGET0SUBEACE A1rs 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS ('i 0 ___ PRELHIMIAR KOLOINQ..__ DIGESTION WET OXIDATID3I(ZIMMERANAN ETC, ---- . .DEWATERING MECH. UEwATU1!NGq aiAC. FILTHATION-_ i o I~--- ;;l~DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIAL/TO PF-ULIC AS SOIL CONDITIONER ___ 20s.STREAM TYPE .TIDAL 219 STREAM CLASS B O._ _.__ 22 .REC E I V ING NATER & MILE pT..* LONG ISLAND-ZQUNQ 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24t--ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS O .25 OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 2O6sOPERATING PERMIT_.FXPIRE&0_N 27. ACTUAL FLON (KGO) 1.900 ___� 28%_BASES FOR FLO-i RETEREU 29, ADEwUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEgUAIE 30t._.HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD N.0 jq ~31. METERING - SE~iAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ------- OPERATIONAL RESULTS --------- LIMIT _INF..__ tLUENT ..__PERC NT .-IOLA--.SAMtLES kI/L LB/DAT MG/L MG/L LB/OAT RERD AL TION BY 8 0.-. 86. 70l 1109, 186 PLANT RECORD - 6.Sa a 7&86 62 PLANTRECORO SET, S.* 89-6 OTHLX AGENCY P -p TOTAL K mTOTAL GIVEN INIL/L. .I . .t*..MNLE POINTS...TU..tEAREST..LE-NT 0 --- .- - . - . . - . - - - - - - -.. - _ E-1O J.54_YEAR _PrFBMUNICIPAL SeT01a 1MPYENTORYOVE ILHAWE OF-LOC A L.Ll ,8000 24 COUNTY WES2Ccmb7 R 0# PLANT UIO 20 PR5*__TYE OF PLANT, COUNTY, DISTRICT ORft QERSHIP_ 6, DRAINAGE RASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN TLING I SLAN D SOUND CaLL ENVIROWIEREdL REGION NEW-F907.3- -39 LOCAL HEALTH UNIT wESTCHESTE R C INATI __ _9SACQULECT l.N SYSTEM TYPEAQItAJaR lot SIGNIFICANT IND USTRIA WASTES NO lieLLPL ANT GRACE ID 12, CHIE OPERATOR GRADET ------- DSSISTANTL OP ERATORF 14. TEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1965 o ______ _ 22. LATEST MAJOER MPROVEmNT, s LA 23 PERIBUTARY PCPULATION 80C00 ~_�._--1Tr.-DESGnFLOA 100S OF--GAL-% ' tBOO00 O 25. TREATMENT UNITS O I S~~~~RELIN(INAKY A-FEN-OS IUIIr~.OI'-HME 26. O PRINGRY SEPTLINi TAqia ECH, SLXIGE COLL, TRIERMEDOIATE. -SECONDOARY TERTIARY . 9. A ACHLORINATION OBOH PRE POST CHLORINATION DI SPOSD AUL OUE-LIQUaID.s s M D kL) I C HtRaEJQ_ RF-kC E-AJ- 31. SLUDEGE HANDLING UNITS PRELI TINA S DIGESTION DENATER11 4Q _.. DISPOSAL OF SLUD GE TG/ O ANOTHER TION f i t 133. 67. 1226. 34TE N IECOR j 111 ~21# STREAMI CLASS 8 ___22s RECEIVING W._ER _ MILE.6Z~ _LA tLRElC2R 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS ___ 0 S2 ADDITIONAL EfF.UENT LImIT5_ Q P~~25 OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED O N 46/27163 26, OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 27O ACTUAL FL GIVENIN) 1,900 28 A*M SES FOR FLOMT . -EARSLEETNEREU 29t ADEUUACY OF CHL08INATION AGOiaQATE ___.___30 #___HYORAULIC OvERLOAL) Nn 31$ METERINQ , SEMiAGE FLON EFFLUENT ....... ......r OPERATIONAL REWLTS ----I~cl�)�l MG/L LB/OAY te/L -AG/L LB/DAY REMO t1lLT113 ti ~~ e~~~o~~o, ~ 57 'i PZ LANT RECORD SET, S,* Po TOTAL._ No TOTAL 13.2t388 1950 atzEWZR CONSs i 8 s PGIVEN IN ML/L **_K. rILEPOjNTS. To .-NEAFREST-1ENTH- E-ll 0 s,-�wrr-F-s _~ -- ~~~Q~~ucw~~rL'l~ -- 97a2--CFEBs MUNICIPAL SoTsV. INVENTORY I- 1.HAM ODTLLCAUL1 NlRDCI4LLC 2* COUNTY WESTCHSTR 55 3,_HAME OF PLANT . RQCHEIE ST.___ 4. PLANT MO. I 5.-TYPE 13F PLANT - COUNTY DISTRICT OR OiNERSHIP_ O 6s DRAINAGE 6ASIN ATLANTIC~ OCEAN - LONn ISLANU SOUND LL_.ENY1RONMENTAL REGION PE)_PALTL233 __ 8 LOCAL HEALTH UNIT KEA RMtELLE CITY 9tGCOLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE SP__ RATE' 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO '-11,-PLANT GRACE S- 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 13#-ASSISTANT OPERATOR 1t4 YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1955 O 15 ___ .___1ScTYEAR -LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEHMENTS 964 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 64500 .. 17.lr-OESIGN FLOW OO0SDL~GALci i50000 18. TREATMENT UNITS i , F~~~RELIMINAa! 8ARSCn~~tiCOKMINUTOR ,LGHttC(HAWlEP -- PRIMARY SETTLIM rZAN( MECH, SLUDGE COLLI INTERMEOIATF SECONDARY CHLRINATION BOTH PRE I POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS SBO9EUI-~iARGEJOJRFACEAIERS 19t SLUDGE HANDLING.UNITS O C~~~~~~~RELIMINARY-Nrol~~Ero~sbj~iE~jEi DIGESTION ANAEROBIM DIGESTIONISEPARATE 0IGESTERS DEWATERING ..ECH URIN VAC.FILTRIION 0 DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE INCINEWA5AIOC 20I.STREAN.TYPE TIDAL 21. STREAM CLASS B __22._ RECEIVING WATER 4 MILE P-T qt* LONG ISL-00_SOUND 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24A__ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS- 25, OPERATING PER1IT ISSUED ON 2/11/64 26. OPERATING PERIT_ .PIRES ON 27, ACTUAL FLOW (mGO) 11.500 28 BASES FOR FL0U - .- ---- METERED 29, ADEQUACY OG CHLORINATION ADEQUATE .. 30, HYDRAULIC UVERLOAU No J -~ 31, METERING - SEAAGE FLOW EFFLUENT .............. OPERATIONAL P-SULTS ------------- -- ~ ..ePERMITLIMITS ____ 1N7 EFFLUENT -_ Pi.RCENT_.I OLA_._ SAMPLES_ _ MG/L L8/OAY AG/L MG/L LB/DAT FMO AL TION 3 B.O.O, .110 88, 8440 20.0 PLANT RECORD SS, Ui*S6*.OLQ75A 6.0 RLANTRECOR _ SET, S.* 86.0 OTHER AGENCY Pe TOTAL- N' TOTAL 0 GIVEN IN ML/L - *MILLEPOINTS TO NEAREST-TENTH o aE E-12 4b . 9 2CfEB) MUNICIPAL S.TsWo INVENTORY__ L-NAAME .-CF-OCALLTT iEYON~ C_ 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 58 _____3.- NAME OF PLANT~ e ARL.JLAND 4. PLANT NO. - 5i .-TYPE OF PLANT CITY 0 Qr6% DRAINAGE HASIN ATLANTIC OCEAI - LONG ISLAND SOUND 1..EN'NIRONNENTAL REGION S. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT * _____ 9tCOLLECT IOIV SYSTEM TYPE.---- CUM-iNED 10, SIQNIEICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES YES * . _.11, PLANT GRADE B 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 A3L.ASSISTANT OPERATOR 14i YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1942 _ _ rs.� YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMP4OVEMENTS 16i TRIBUTARY POPULATION 6000 _____A7OESIGN FLO4 (100$ OFGAL0 15000 O - 18. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY PRIMARY . PLAIN SETTLING TANK INTERMEOIATF SECONDARY TERTIARY CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION 01.SPOSAL O aRY L I -i ...A 19, SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIXINARY RIGESTION AANAEROBIC DIGESTIONeSEPARATE OIGESTERS DENATERING nRYING BED DISPOSAL OF SUD BURIAL0 INCL, SANITARY LANDFILL 20OJSTREAHTYPE - 1IDAL 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A 022_.R_.____22~_AECEIVING WATER & MILE 1T LONG> ISLANSO SUNA_______ 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24, __ADITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25, OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 26; OPERATING PERMIT .EXIRES ON 27. ACTUAL FLO4 tMGO) 1.000 O ~...___ .258 -BASES FOR FLON OTHER 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE -.----.30s HYDRAULIC OVERLOAU - -- 31. METERING - SENAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ---- ----- --a OPERATIONAL RESdLTS -- �---------- 0 - P--------- ERMIT .LIHITS ____ INF___ EELUENT _PERAENT VjIOLA-___SAMPLE5 HG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/DAT REMO !Ai. TION BY I to110. 62. 517 4 3, PLANT RECORD SET, So* 58. 16 0 72.4 OTHER AGENCY ?P TOTAL Nu TOTAL 91 E, YEHIN ML/LC 0 ..--. --.~~lL~ELPINT __O. HELIRE~SI~_ ~1 --�rsr-ul,, - - --a- -___ - __-~a~ro~ E-13 *~~~~~ 1'~~~ - II 9192 -(FEB) -MUNIC IPALST &Wt 4YEHTORY I .JAME-GF-LQCALIT.Y ~H E P-1LT- 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 � . .1NAHE OF PLANT 1BELGRAVE.S A4. PLANT NO, * 5aTYPE OF PLANT -- TOWN DISTRICT 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEMA - L0N'r ISLAND SOUND 7. ENVIRONMENTAL.REGION RO- KOiKOMA--tI 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTS' * __________9..COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE SEpAgATf: 10, SIGNIEICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO tIs.PLAmT GRADE- 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 .33LA SSISTANT OPERATOR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1928 15a.YEAR-LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS .4965 Id, TRI8UTARY POPULATION 15000 iITL1LO ESIGN FLO'4. IOOSOF.UGALa1 2qqOa 18. TREATMENT UNITS -PRELIMINARY rHN tIUTDOR__4_T -CHAXER PRIMARY SETTLING TAN<w mECH, SLUDGE COLL# I I~~~~~ITER~tECIATE SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRIC-411ING FILTER TERTIARY -- CHLORINATION POST CHLORINAT~rIN DISPOSAL-OCF.-LIQUIDS sgQR ISCtRfJSLazAC.EATEjS PRELIMINARY DIGESTION *ANAEROBIC DIGE'STIONSEpARATE DIGESTERS DEWATERING-_ DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO ANOTHER S*TI*4, 2(t STREAH.-TYPE - TTOAl 21. STREAM CLASS B ________22 RECEIVING WATER & MILEPITZL~** LITTLE-NECg"AW7 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS ___ ___AODITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25, OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 26-,OPERATING PERMIT EXULRUAN 2?, ACTUAL FLOw (MOD) .1.340 2a-,-BASES FOR FLO14 - xETERE0 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE *30,.HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD _ l .. C 31. METERING - SENAGE CLON *-i. -EFFLUENT .......-P OPERATIONAL RESILLTS ------- PERMIT- LMITS MIT$INF. a_--EFFLUENT .--PERCEN-ii _V IO LA---SAMPLES XG/L LB/DAY M9/L XG/L LB/DAY REMOW.L TION BY C 5.60.00 284. 41. 458 84.4 PLANT RECORD - a S.S. 0 517 22.6 2. _Z & .In8 PLANTRECORD ___________ SET. 5$a 7.2 0.1 99.9 PLANT RECORD TT 115 7i 52 _*59 0 __ _ENVIRCUNS_ Nw TOTAL 31.16 27.48 30J 11.0 ENVIR. CONS* * GIVEN IN ML/L MI EIL.P-F-INU T5JEAREST TENTH E-14 *�I~~F--P~naf~r~L=IICI ~IP -C-- !972-(tFES HUNICIPAL. SsT*W- INVEIORY-- A. MIME OFLOCALI1Y nREAT.-NK-S 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 t__JNAHE OF PLANT GREAT-NECK v 4. PLANT NO. 40. St--TYPE OF PLANT VILLAGE - -6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OC AN s LONr ISLAND -SOUND 7. ENVIRONMENTAL-REGION VONKONkOKA-1 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY 9A_-COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE XEPARATL 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO ____I PLANT GRADE - 12.- CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 13m ASSISTANT OPERATOR- 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1933 15AL-YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS 1 9118 16.2 TRI8UTARY POPULATION 9083 3 I Ta3.DESIGN FLOW (1OOSDF..GAL.~ 1sQo 18,- TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY aRSCXE ,C0NINUTORlrITCHAtsV- PRIMARY SETTLING TANA- MtCR. SLUDGE COLL, TNTERMEDIAtE SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRICKlING FILTER TERTIARY-- CHLORINATION BOTH PRE x POST CHLORINATION QISPOSAL.OF- LIQUIDS sATE-S 19. -SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS E~~~~RELIMINARY DIGESTION ANAEROJ8C OIGESTION'SEpARATE DIGESTERS OE0ATERING___ iECHd .DEATEWERI- vAC._rILTHATIOR_ DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIAL" INCL, SINITARY LANDFILL j T9, STREAM-TYPE TIDAL 21. STREAM CLASS B 22. RECEIVING WATER & MILE PTv** MANHASSET BA- * �� .233 PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS . 24, ADOITZONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 2 5.P OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 6/ 6/6? 26. OPERATING PERMIT .xPIRES ON 6/ 6/12 27. ACTUAL FLOW (NOD) .991 28. BASES FOR FLOW mETERED 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION A0oEUATE ________3Q0j1YDRAULIC OVERLOAD Nn 31, METERING a SEWAGE FLOW -EFFLUENT r OPERATIONAL RESaLTS� PERMILTLIkITS _ INF. EFFLUENT PERCEXT_.vIOLA-_6AMPLES MG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/DAY RENO-AL TION 8Y 6,0 0a 254. 30. 24? 88.3 PLANT RECORD 5.5..~ . 20Q 22.1 161 88a1 PL-AMRECORD SET: S.. 9.5 0.1 99t0 PLANT RECORD _____P___ PJTOTAL.. 10,l ... 8_ 8#5 715H . NVIRS CONS, No TOTAL -58.50 39.a49 326 32.0 ENVIR. CONS, t GIVEN IN 9L/L * MILEPOINTSTaXEARESLTT.Nw E-15 d~~~ I N AME gF-LaCALLTY NMEM3TD T 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 _ ____I NAME OF PLANT- kftEAT NK-SDSR 4. PLANT NO, 7T S*-TYPE OF PLANT TO0 DISTRICT i6 DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN q LONG ISLAND SOUND 7, ENVIRONMENTAL REGION RONONAOUMA-1 68 LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY 10s.-COLLECTION SYSTEM TYP _____ _ SEPARATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES s O Is.-_-PLANT GRADE 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 l3.--ASSISTANT-OPERATOR. 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1962 1IS'YEAR LATEST MAJOR IHP.RDVEHENTS 126? 16. TRI8UTARY POPULATION 10000 1aL DESIGN FLOW CIOOS OF__GALi� I700 18, TREATMENT UNITS ) PRELIHINARY SARACREEHi-COMKIMUT ORp- GRILC TCH-aF PRIMARY SETTLING TANim MECH, SLUDGE COLL, t - INTERmEOIATE SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRICLINO FILTER TERTIARY -_ *. ..- CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL. DF-LIQUIDS SMOR SCHidQGj0SUREACLATERS 19. *SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY DIGESTION .ANAEROtIC DIGESTIONtSEpARATE DIGESTERS DEWATERING ItECM1 OEWATERING- VAC. FILTRATION- DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIAL- INCLs SANITARy LANDFILL '20t 5TREAM_TYFE_ T IDAL *li t' 21. STREAK CLASS a _________2RECEIVING WATER & MILE-PFT** RANHASSETL-B1 23s PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 2_4,AOOITIONAL EFFLUEriT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON __ _4OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRZS-N 217 ACTUAL FLOd (NGO) 2*560 C .21 BASES FOR FLOW , ETERED 29s ADEjUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE : J,.3HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD N 31o METERING a SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT - ----------- OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------------- C� PERNZL ~LIMITS ___INf. __ EFFLLUENT. IPERCENTiIfOL A-SAMSLE~s MG/L LB/DAY nG/L MG/L LB/DAY REMO,-AL TION jY. C a 10. -2338 39. 8 32 3.6 PLANT RECORD I64. 25t0 5 3 8a 4 a PLA NTLRE CORQ SET. S.* 3.8 0 1 97.4 PLAN(T RECORD C .P ~TOTAL 3.t .7Z 10 0 10 _ _ VIRR-ONS_ Me TOTAL 36,41 27.00 576 25.0 ENV-IRs CONS* KLE GIVEN IN AL/L *a MILt�oI KLS1_AONEARE~L~1I~iT E-16 1972-CEB) eXUNICIPAL.-STWs ViNVENTORY iliHAME.OiE-LfCIT'~l 1*HES~ 2* COUNTY NASSAU 28 3 NAHE.OF PLANT pLaASHOT!LSD A. PLANT NO. � TYPE OF-PLANT 104K DISTRICT.- 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LONG ISLAND SOUND V. FRVIRONMENTAl REGION RONKDNKdMA-I 8. -LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY Sjc, COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPL E- -EpARKTE 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL MASTES NO .Its PLANT. GRADE - -. . 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 I.a A SSSTANT OPERATOCR-. 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1951 A5Z. -YEAR LATEST MAJOR IHPROVEMLNTS 1a68 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 21600 17, DESIGN FLOVL 30000AL ~ ~ P~ 18, TREATMENT UNITS J PRELIMINARY PRIMARY SETTLING TANKs mECH* SLUU'GE COLL. INTERHEDIATF -SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRICKLING F-LTER TERTIARY. CHLORINATION 8QTH PRE g POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL. OFI LIQUIDS 403 RC EIQJREA.CL�ITfRS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS DIGESTION DEWATERING - oRyING BED (. DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE INCINERATION .2 0 ST REAK -TYPE T !OAL 21. STREAM CLASS B 22. RECEIVING MATER & MILE .fII~* MANHASSET BAY 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS :24. ADDTIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 1/ 9/68 26, OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 1/ 9/73 2T.a ACTUAL FLOW CMGO) 2,629 e28. BASES FOR FLOM ETEREO 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEqUATE _________Hr3Q1YDRAULIC -OVERLOAU N o 31. METERING a SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT * OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------- (-: PERRII.LTLIMITS_ IN______F FLUENT ____PERCENT.j___V0LA-!_3AMPLE.S 2 MO/L LS/DAY MG/L HQ/L LB/DAY REMOvAL TION By ( 5.0.. .210. 33. 1160 74 6 PLANT RECORD .2) 5,5. ~~2O8i..eOt3.I1_O2. I6L0~L NLRtCORO_______ SET$ S.* 6.3 0.1 96.5 vLANT RECORD PTOTAL 6,5 1 42AT.0 NVIR.CONS_ No TOTAL 45.098 28.08 615 38.0 ENVIX. CONS. 4 GVYEN IN ML/L *l* ILE. _POINTSTDAEARESTLILNIH E-17 I. -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. '9TZ4-FEB).J~UN1ICIPAU5.T.W INVl~EH(TURT_ '. NAME O-LLOCALLY ROYLYH Y 2a COUNTY NASSAU 2d 36 SAME OF PLANT qO5CYN V 4. PLANT NO. 12 � SkTYPE OF PLANT - VILLAGE_. 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN L LONi ISLAND SOUND ?. ENVIRONMENTAL--REGION ROKKONKQMA-lI B. LOCAL HEALTH-UNIT NASSAU COUNTY. _______t COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE_. _SEP-AgAE 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES .iPLANT GRADE 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 � I 3L A SSISTANT-- OPERATOR - 14. YE-AR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1942 15a YEAR-LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMEXTS t963 .16. TRIOUTARY POPULATION 3500 *-i7-.L ESIc t i 7-sDESIGNL OS.AiALJ 12Q 18. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY AR-SCHEENx-COMMINUTORA-GRI-T--CHARSFR PRIMARY SETTLING TAN-,- ECH. SLUUGE COLL. YNTERMEOIATF SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRIC,~LING FILTER TERTIARY CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATIUN nISPOSAL-OF.-LIQUIDA SHOM-0R.SCRARGE GItQURiACF FlA ER 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY DIGESTION ANAEROBIC DIGESTION'IMHOFF DEKATEHING_ DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO ANOTHER ST,.. 2.AL TREAM --TYPE TIOAL 21i STREAM CLASS A 22. RECEIVING WATER M NILE PTs** HEMPSTEAO HAR-OR 23, pERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS '24m.'AODITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS :C; 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON /111/67 26, ~OPERATING PERMIT EXPIBES ON ?/1IL2 2 '27 ACTUAL FLOW onUO) 0.422 28. BASES FOR FLOW _ _K __ METEREO 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE ________3AHYDRAULIC OVERLOAD N n C 31. METERING - SENACE FLOW I. *. EFFLUENT . ----.- ..... OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------------- CE RX I I L I M I T_ IFR____ a F LU E NT .- P ER CENT . I L A -___SA MPLES MG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/DAY REMO..AL TION t C 5.0,0. 2275 5 1 179 81I4 PLANT RECORD SIT6, 6 t 3 7 3 3. PLANT--RECORD SET. Set 10.8 Olt 9910 PLANT RECORD - _ _TOTAL I0#8I8 19 10.. EN V IR..C O N S.._ No TOTAL -31.4 ENVIR4 CONS. t GIVEN IN ML/L mc ** RifIL P O INT ~i...IOJEA RESL1JEE18 E-18 of 1 9?2 CFE5)jHUNIC 1PAL_ 5.T.1 IIAMIHfSNTORY .. A -NAEA L-F- LOCALITY GLEtLEYS 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 3t.NAMZ-QF PLANT GLEM-COVE- i 4. PLANT NO, 1* t-TYPE OF PLANT C I TY.. _________ 6. DRAINAGE iASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN L LONP ISLANO SOUND Ta ENVIROHMENTAL. REGION RONKONKOMA-1 - 'a 8. LOcAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNT- .9.COLLECTION SYSTER TTPE--- SEPPRAIE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES IxlPLANT GRADE 12I CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 ) iU a-ASSISTANT OPERATOU 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTEO 1919 15t YEA?, LATEST MA.JORIHPROVEMENXIS 4S64 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION '25000 .-~---~-~t- .--DESIGN FLO&. C 10OS-Of-GAL-0 aof 18. TREATMENT UNITS 'I -p&tLZgINARy ~ARCRCOMK1RUTORHT- H* ! - PRIMARY SETTLING TAnW mECH. SLUDGE COLL, !NTER;EOIATr 11 SECOhOARY HIGH RATE TRICALING FILTER IERTIARY.-- C. CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION OISPOSAL-OF-LIQUIUS ,aFiSIIAasEILaEACL)BERs 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINAR~Y T H ICKENING DIGESTION ANAERQuIC OIGESTIONCSEpARATE DIGESTERS DEWATERINS- * DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA .2STREARJEYtPE_ YrnflA 21. STREAK CLASS * 22-,-RECEIVING SATER & MILE P-it ** C QvfIi-QEEX 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS _________2kADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIHITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 12/ 6/63 24,jOpERATING PERMIT-ePLRLW ON 27. ACTUAL FLOW CMGD) (M.06 C _________Z 4.jASES FOR FLOW tE TERED 29. AOEIUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEqUATE Qf0 HYDGAULIC OVERLOAO_ YES C 31. METERING w SEAAGE FLOW D EFFLUENT -P OPERATIONAL RESULTS P-----I ---e C. PERHlT-LIM1TS -IHfv EEFLQENT- PERCTA L T _Dy I 9LA--m--SA-t-l LES M2jL .LB/OAY NG/L MG/L LB/DAY REM A.L- TIO tN y C a B.ID. 324. 299 4177 69.5 PLANT RECORD s4o. Z5 .-IL98 2 4 5 PLANL-ECQRO SET, S.* 10*5 .1 99.9 PLANT RECORD C1, P" T O1 AL * 13,3.83s8 3536.:38,0 Ei YI0...C ON~t__._ _ N _ - No TOTAL 26.00 24*90 1050 4.0 EsOIR, CONS. . GIVEN IN HL/L 9 �L t1L-1N1P S LIn NEARESTTENTH E-19 A.*N a _. .__._- __ _ _ c _d1972..-CFE8) MUNICIPAL S.TaWs INvENTORY ___ A-ME OF-LOCALI.y GtEN.-COU-C 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 Q ___ 3#_NANE OF PLANT -jQ8GAN ISLAND 4A PLANT NO. 2 ..TYPE OF PLANT * 6.ba DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN.- LONG ISLAN0. SOUND 7. ENVIRONAENTAL.REGIN . RONKONKOMiA-1 - 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY -- � .. ____ _1COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE _ SEPAHA.ATE ( 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES HO - _____ L11..PLANT GRADE . O 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 ( *J3_AS13j SISTANT OPERATOR__ 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTEO 1945 ___15,.-VEAR LATEST MAJOR. 1MPROVEMENTA ( 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 250 .__. ~ZDESlGN FLOA (�OOS OF---GALl Soo o 18. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY PRI1ARY SEPTIC TANKc ~~ :J pH~INIRNEOIATV SECONDARY TERTIARY. - CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATI;DN . DISPOSAL OF LUI9D0 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS Q� 0PRELIMINARY DIGESTION ANAEROtIC OIGESTIUN(IMHOFF. ______________DEXATERING o DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO ANOTHER Sa.T.4 s20..STREAH -TYPE IOAL 21. STREA) CLASS A _22RECRECEIVING WATER . HILEATI~* LOND IAND~5OUDT ( 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS -_____ 24s. -ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIM-ITS 0- 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON . 26. OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 27, ACTUAL FLOW (MG -0 0 _ 28._ BASES FOR FLOWi OTHER 29. ADEUUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQtUATE tHYUAHY0RAULIC OVERLOAD - 31. METERING - SEWAGE FLOW Ii1 EFFLUENT -.......-..-....OPERATIONAL RESULTS ---------- -L 8 ~~. 9E R _ERMIT_ LIMITS - INFO -EFFLUENT - F.ERCENT_, V I(LA-.___5AmES MG/L LBIDAY MG/L MG/L LB/DAY REM0,41. TION try . ``~B~b, o, 144. 118. 39 1821 ENVIR. CONS, 3.5.- a . f iks-19itIHa CONS. SETO So* 13.0 5.0 61.6 OTHLK AGENCY Po TOTAL.._ No TOTAL *'GIVEN IHN L/L -t MILE. PGINTS.-.T.-hEARESTTIEhTl' E-20 i9~-~LB)MUHICIPAL4.�T.4INV!ENtORv 4- NAME OF-LOCAL I T Y rfYST_8AY_:? 2. COUNTY. NASSAU 28 3&-HNAE O F PLA NT EYSTER BAY--.50' 4. PLANT NO* *stTYPE OF PLANT _ TOWN DISTRICT 6s ORAINAGE AASIN kTLANTIC OCEAN LONr, ISLAND SOUND0 7. ENVIRONMENTAL .REGION RONKONKJMA-1 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY 9t COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE-- ____ SEPARATL E * 10 SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO laI_.PLANT GRADE - - 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 IZ..ASSISTANT.OPERATOR a 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1965 1A5 4i'YEAR LATEST MAJOR iHFROlE.MENWTK 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 7125 ?IaL-DESIGH FLOACt1DOS OF__GjL.0 12000 18. TREATMENT UNITS 9 * pBELTMINAI~ .PLARSCREEN LQRLTCIAgqEP PRIMARY SETTLING TANBm mECH. SLUoGE COLL, !NTER4EDIATP SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRICKLING FILTER IERTIARY-- CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION nlSPOSAL. OF-LIQUID- ; lt0RF_ SCKARGE__1 _fiUA.C ATERS 19s SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY DIGESTION ANAEROBIC OIGESTION'SEPARATE DIGESTERS DEWATERING. !4ECHa.-OEWATERING' vAC#.-.FILTKATIGN DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIAL" INCL, SANITARy LANDFILL 2.._SlREAMTYPF TTOAL 21. STREAX CLASS A 22.2 RECEIVINGAIIATER 6 HILEB rIYSTER BAY.AARBOF 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS _________A-f1ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LImITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON . P22-UPEHAT-ING PERMIT _E(XP1RE3 ON 27. ACTUAL FLOW (CGD) t o 199 C _________2tLBASES FOR FLOA - METEHETE E 29, ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEUUATE IQLAHYORAULIC OVERLOAD 31. METERING w SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ..... OPERATIONAL RESULTS -o- - - -I-lS PERMITLImITS __JNF. EFFLUENT _ PERCENTL IOA- __SA14PLES 9 MO/L L8/DAY MQ/L MGlL LB/OAT REHOAL TION By (.0.0. 14I . 23. 229 83.7 PLANT RECORD 9 7-9 a5 .~2p a ?PLhNTREC0RD_ SET, 5* 3.3 .1 99,9 PLANT RECORD Pm TOTAL 7T4 A 5. 55 24,0 _nVIR. CONS* N- TOTAL 26065 20.46 204 23,0 ENVIR, CONS. * GIVEN IN ML/L ** M~t-IIILE IriT5 TIOJ4EARESTLMIMtl -2 E-2 1 0-~~�ie~~~~~rr~~r~--- ___j6liIU)i~b~~~ 0 ---_-� C-' r.. 1972 --CFEEB13MUN ICIPAL S-T-Xv INV ENTORY... ArNANE 0F-.LOCALITY 4UNTGTNT. -T 2. COUNTY 4UFFOLK 47 3*- NAME OF PLANT. NUNTIN6TON So 4. PLANT NamD. ._-~ ~._TYPE OF PLANT TOMN DISTRICT O 6. DRAINAGE 8ASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LowNi ISLAND SOUND 1. E NVIRONMENTAL REGION RD NK ONINUOIA-1I *.4 LOCAL HEALTH.UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY O____ 9__ _COLLECTIO3 SYSTEM TYPE Ep sEPAA T E 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO _____ II.. PLANT GRAOE -- 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 .A3,-ASSISTANT UPERATOR 1l4 YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1915 _______15.YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENIS~I97O 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 1600 _--- 17t-_ESIGN FLOro C100 OF_-GAL.0 20099. 15, TREATMENT UNITS II PRELIMINAaY lARSCREN__G.RTCHAUaER PRIMARY SETTLING TAN:, NECH, SLUDGE COLL, TNTERCODIARC SECONRARY HIGH RATE TRICKLING FILTER TERTIARY CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION 49 DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS sT CXLRINAIDN 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS 0: ~ ~~~~PRELIMINA R Y CHERHICAL-ADUITION DIGESTION -- ___________ CEWATERING NECK.. DEWATERjNG- VAC*FILTRATION DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIAL- INCL, SANITARY LANDFILL .A -. .Rot-,0STREAK TYPE,- T IDA 21, STREAM CLASS 0 O __ 22 RECEIVING WATER & MILE pI,~ ISLAND SOU-ND 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS _ ~24o 'ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25, OPEHATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 10/ 9/70 26, OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRESON 10/_9/72 2?. ACTUAL FLO4 tHGO) 1R200 _.___ j28._BASES FOR FLOH METERED 29,0 ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION AuEtUATE ___30._HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD No 31. METERING I SEAAGE FLOW EFFLUENT . ....... OPERATIONAL RESULTS -------------- PERMIT.,LIMITS INF, EFFLUENT __ PERCENT VIOLA- __SA'4PLES MG/L: LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/DAT REMDAL TIUN BY 0 8,O.~. *3T19, 190 p4,9 PLANT RECORD ---- S� S L_._ ~ Ba,.~ 7010 rpo._710 PLANT._RECORO ______ SET# SOTL 28*0 0,1 99.6 ENVIR. CONS. Q~~~~~~~~~~*, 1,6_p ______ 16P__ __6 68~_ O _____ ENVIR,~ CONS. ____ N- TOTAL 42163 12.11 121 .ltO ENVIR. CONS. 0 '-`-; ~MGIVEN TI ML/L0- ji E A R E 3 T- 1 E N T - -------- - -------- - - - - -2 E-22 7 FEB) MUNICIPAL S*T*Wo INVENTORY .IL. NAME aF LOCALITY NORTHPRTLI 2. COUNTY SUFFOLK 41 _______r__NH3,AE OF PLANT NORTHPURL V -1 4. PLANT NO% 4 .55-TYPE OF PLANT -VILLAGE o b6 DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN L-ON., ISLANO SOUND ZLENVIRONMENTAL REGION RONKONKONA-J of LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY 9,tCOLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE ~ SE___- sEFAJRATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES NO %I,__--2 PLANT GRADE _ 0 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 1.1 ASSISTANT OPERATOR- 14i YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1932 O _15,YEARLATEST MAJOR INPROVENEj{TS 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 3000 1?-. IZI-.~DESIGM FLON (OOS OF-GAL-a 33QO 18, TREATMENT UNITS ( PRELIAINARY 5taL-SCREEfL PRIMARY IMHOFF TANK INTERMEDIATE .3ECONDARY TERTIARY CHLORINATION *POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIDS 05OREUISCtAEIQ4RL..A1ERS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNIT3 PRELIMINARY HOLDING ( DIGESTION ANAEROIC DIGESTIONrIMHOFF H O~r(ATEHING____ DRYING BED O- DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIALm INCL, SANITARY LANDFILL ( ft0.STREAX TYPE.. TIDAL 21, STREAM CLASS A 22. t_~RECE I V ING HWATER & MILE FT,*. NORTM TAR. R 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24, AOOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERHIT ISSUED ON 2/2/32 51 26. OPERATING PERMITEXPIRES ON 2?. ACTUAL FLOW (RHD) 04170 O 28. BASES FOR FLOA ._ METERED 29, ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE 30, HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD . 3 31. METERING - SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT . ............. OPERATIONAL RESULTS .......... 0 . PERMIT LIMITS __ INF__ - EFFLUENT _. PERCENT vIOLA- __SAMPLES MO/L LB/DAY MG/L MGiL -LB/QAY REMU:AL. TION dY 1 0 - B~o~o. 21-6. 1~2. 170 4j.5 ENVIR. CaNS. SS, ~ ~ ~ ~ T_ . 19 155.0 21 1PI3,r4 ENV I R ,CONS,________ SET. s.* 11.0 093 91 ENVIRO CONS. 0 . Pw TOTAL N. TOTAL 0t GI~VEN EHINML-/L --.~.---r*JILL2 OIITS TDNEARE ST-EHT 0 E-23 Q~~~~~~~ 8 ~ ~ - �-- - --�-� - -- �----� - - - - 0z 1972 -(FEB) MUNICIPAL 5.J.NV IVENTCRY N.NAME. OF_ LOCALfIY BROKHAYN-1- 2. COUNTY SUFFOLK 41 O _________3. MNA4E OF PLANLT_ STRtROR Y BRT ____ 4. PLANT MOD 9 59--TYPE OF PLANT PRIVATE SENERAGE DISPOSAL CORP. 6. DRAINAGE MASIN ATLANT'IC OCEAN LONt; ISLAND SOUND ?,-ENVIRONMENTAL REGION ROKKONKOMA-1- 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLA COUNTY 9. COLLECTION SISTER TYPE ____ ____SEpARATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO lit.!II PLANT GRADE A t12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 1UnASSISTANT OPE8ATOR__._ 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTEO 1966 O __-I _5.YEAR LATEST HAJOR IMPXOVEMENTS 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 6400 IT%__OeSIGN FLOW CLOOS.-OaGAL,3 3600 18. TREATMENT UNITS C PRELIMINARY KM1NUIORRrN{I~ijSR PRIMARY * ~~~~~INT~EQiIATE- SECONDARY CONTACT STABILIZATION TERTIARY CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATIINI ) O-ISPOSAL OF.-LIQUIDS ILIAAI.IUKIDEi 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UAITS DIGESTION AEROBIC DIGESTION DEhATERING DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE .SCAVENGER ____ 20_.STREAM.TYPE 4RO-N0 21. STREAM CLASS A 22, RECEIVING WATER t MILE.PT.*. TRIP3 O_LNGjSQSHI)N 23s PER100 OF CHLORINATION 24% -AOGDTIONAL EFFtLUENT LIMITS 25, OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 1f2015 26, OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 21o ACTUAL FLOW (RGD) 0289 3 0 -...-~-__ 28. BASES FOR FLOO ... METERED 29. ADE4UACY OF CHLORINATION AOEQUATE 30# HYDRAULIC OVENLOAD -0 31. METERING A SEWAGE FLOW WEIR EFFLUENT ......r OPERATIONAL RESULTS-w-- A-a... PERMIT LIMITSI__,NF __ EFFLUENT - -, PERCENTVIlaLA-__SAmPLES jG/L LB/DAY MG/L MS/t. LB/DAY REHMOAL TION U Y o 5.0.. I290. 27'. 6! 90.1 P LANT RECORD 20Qs..__5Q 12Q_ I.,O PLA.RIREFCOR9 _ SET. S.* A TOTAL_ No TOTAL 0 � - *GIVEN INML/L - ----- . E.tIL E-OINTS 1 Q.NEAR S1E 5 IT- -r-� I. -n -- -�4 I1V~ . 9 *- nI- �~-L- - - E-24 _____________ - ------ - -~-- --U-.- .-LIYUJ- LMy~Yi�-�(i L_ 2A972 -CFES.. MUNICIPAL SoT.N, INVENTORY- 1 .__IIHAHE L~LPGCLIT.Y IRO HAYNLT 2. COUNTY SUFFOLK 41 3. NAME OF PLANT- - pJEFERSON s o 4. PLANT NO. I 5, -TYPE OF PLANT COUNTY DISTRICT OR O,;NERSHP O6 DRAINAGE BASIN � ATLANTIC OCEAN - LONG ISLANU SOUND 0 __ _ __ENVIRONAENTAL REGION RlNONQONMA-I 8S LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY 0 ____ 9,j9 COLLECTION SYSTEN TYPE __ 10, SIG!IFICANT IMUUSTRIAL WASTES YES I.1la PLANT GRADE' - 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE - __ _ 13L ASSISIA4T OPERATOR _3 3 14i NEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTE D ~ t O ~ _1r._.r~LALTEST MAJOR I MP O VE E 4TS-S~l 6 3-- 16% TRI~UIAR~ POPULATION 9000 ____ IiaDESIGN FLOW ttOOS 00- OGAhL, 15000Q 18. IREATHENT UNITS PMELIMINARY PAR SCREEN- PRIMARY SETTLIK TA~x, MECH4 SLUDGE COLL# INTERHEDIATE ' C U SECONDARY TERIIARY CHLORINARION BOTH PRE & POST CHLORINATION1( D I SPOSAL OF-LIgUIs V RRF CHAEGEJLOJF*ACElA ftj 19g SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS o PPRELIMINAR Y HOLDING O __ DIGESTION ANAEROBIC 0IGESTIONCSEPARATE DIGESTERS DEWATERING DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE 3 k-i WGE 20--,- TRAR T A MY-PE V - TIDAL 21.c STREAM CLASS C 0 - _22._RECEIVI2G NATER & MILE-PTI** pORT JEFFERSON HAR80 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL 24v-ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERRIT ISSUED ON J/35 26.DOPERATING PERMIT LAPIRESUN 271 ACTUAL FLON (MGD) 1.240 -.25. BASES FOR FLO41 METERED 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION AOE0UATE 30 HY DRAULIC OVERLOAD NO 31. METERING v SEMAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ..... OPERATIONAL RESULTS O------~--.l- O ______________EERM1T LIMITS _ _INF,_--- EFFLUENT _PERCENT -VIOLA- -__SAMPLES MO/L LB/DAY Mo/L AG/L LB/DAT HE9OQvAL TION U Y O - 8.0.0. 141. 94. 972 33,3 PLANT RECORD 5,5, S t I I?, - Is V. 5-_ At5 8 PLANRECGRD _ - SET. 5St 552 Oft 99.9 PLANT -ECORD - P- TOTAL- _ __________ X-. TOTAL 19.06 24,03 245 A.O ENVIR* CONS. o ik GIVEN- IN-NL/L .~* � - ~M LEQPOINTS I 61 NEARE S T-TE TH 4 -- �- -- L- � - --- - -9 -f-1 . I - - 2- - E- 25 E-2 5 ..1972 .(FE8 MUNICIPAL. TW. INVERITOCRT 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AL.JNAME OF-LOCALITY GREENPKI-Y 2. COUNTY SUFFOLK 47 O -.~ ),..NAME OF PLANT - REENP URT_,_ V- 4. PLANT Nos 7 _______5TYPE OF PLANT . VILLAGE O 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LONG ISLAND SOUND O 1-ENVIRORNENTAL REGION RONKUNK~OMA- go LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUrrT ___ ___ ,COLLE~ON SYSTEM TYPE . __ _SEFAO-TE- 10. SIGNIFICANT INOUSTRIAL WASTES NO il_. PLANT GRACE O _ 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 _ 13tASSISTANT UPERATCH,_ I 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1940 ID___ 15.rEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVE9ENTS 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 3000 ._L 1T.0ESIGt{ FLOA (1006o OFGAL.x )000 - O) 18. TREAT*ENT UNITS PRELIHMNARY QAR3SCREEN PRIMARY 1nHUFF TANK INTERMEDIATE SECONDARY TERTIARY CHLORINATION BOTH PRE , POST CHLORINATION .DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIDS 9 N LAI. .CH A R E-1 1A-Eig5U RF-.LtA ER5 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS .Q P~~~~~RELIMINAA't HOLD ING_ DIGESTION ANAERUdIC ojG~sTlOHtIMH0FF DENATERING DRY.ING-BED - DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO PUBLIC AS SoIL CONDITIONER oil 20L___S.TREAR TYPE r!OAL 21, STREAM CLASS __22, RECEIVING WATER & MILE--PT.#* - LONG JSLAND-SOUN0 23, PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS __.___24t.AOOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS. 0~ 25, OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 3/21/38 _24t-OP ERATING PERMIT EXPIRESON 27. ACTUAL FLOR (MGOD 00296 2 , eASES FOR FLOW METRERE 29, ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION AOEQUATE _-___ .3OtHjORAULIC OVERLOAL) - - 31, METERING - SEWAGE FLON EFFLUENT . ............. OPERATIONAL RESULTS � ------- ;;:; 0 h; PERMIT LIMITS __lNFa_ EFFLUENT --PERCENT _.vIOLA-_SAMFLE OG/L LB/ODAY G/L MG/L LB/IAY RENOiAL TION By a 08.0ao0 234, 156.* ENVIR, CONS. 5. as22 2 95.0 236- 9 5NVIR.33NS.__a____ I R *-c SET: S., 14,0 O 1 l 99,9 ENVIR, CONS. 0 . P- TOTAL. - Mm TOTAL o3 ' GOIVE IN NL';-L 'PLZLEP.O1NT51OJNEARET _fT~rE- __~~_ _. C1_ . _ i-C - - - - I- - ----� rc Lm- -u ~-- -- - ~r ~.r r -~ ri.~ -1 rr CLD.LDe~ - ~ ~ q~~~_- ~~ E-26 --rwnw S ____._ -- -- 8 . .~--.. ----- .1972__(FEB) MUNICIPAL.SiT.~r 1NVENTORY j 2. COUNTY 3,UFFQLK 47 OJNAME OF PLANT - RI YIERH E A 0_ 30 4. PLANT NO, 6 .5---5*.TY PE OF PLANT. TOaiN OISTRiCT _ 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN L IONf; ISLAND -SOUND. ( ?.--NYIRONMENTAL REGION RONKOONMA-L1_ 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY * _______ 9,.COLLECT IOu SYSTEM TYPE SEPAHATE ( 10.. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL XASTES NO II&.PLANT GRADE R 0 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 ( J3..ASSISTANT OPERATORI 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1937 O _______i5aYEAR LATEST.MAJOR .IHPROMENTS ( 16.' TRIBUTARY POPULATION 6000 o1?* DESIGN FLOW tlOOS.Of-GAL0 !2000 : O 18rSe TREATMENT UNITS PRELIAINARY 5AR.-5CREUIT--L8AMBER PRIMARY SETTLING TAN:- RECHo SLUDGE COLL, - ~~~~INTERAEDIATE,___ SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRIC4LING FILTER TERTIARY- CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION 01SPOSAL .OF-LIQUIOS tOEDSCAGTSi~C 'ATR 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS *0o __-PRELIHINARY THICKNING DIGESTION ANAER08IC OIGEFTIONCSEpARATE DIGESTERS -DEWATERING DRYING BED DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE eURIAL/TO PUdLIC AS SOIL CONOITIONER 20*STREANTYPE._ TLUAL 21, STREAM CLASS C *_____22o__,RECEIVING OATER 4 MILE-P-T-,_* FECONIC RIVEH 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24t.ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS- OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 11/159 2 t OPERATING PERMIT EXPI9ES ON 27. ACTUAL FLOW (MOO) 01375 28, BASES FOR ML METEREU 29. AOE;UACY OF CHLORINATION AOEQUATE 30t-HYUHAULIC OVERLOAU NG a METERING - SEMAGE FLOW EFFLUENT . .......... OPERATIONAL RESULTS ----------- 0 ----- ~PER MIT- LIMITS INF. EFFLUENT _ __ PERCENTuIOLA..SAAPLE5 MG/L LB/OAY MG/I HG/L LB/UAY REHO-iAL TION BY dofD. 4332. 57. 178 82.8 ENVIR* CONS. ._StSt 188L $9, 100*0 312_ ____ _VIR__.. CONS_ SET, S,* 23,0 oil 9909 ENVIR. CONS, -a TOTAL-, . -' 9.7 __T. 5_____ 2 322,0 ___ E___NVIR.. CONS. N* TOTAL -35364 3 9048 123 29.0 ENVIR. CONS$ 0 - ig MLLEN IN *A - ILE.pOINTS TO._NEARESLTIERT? E-27 __~972- -(FEB) MUNICIPAL SiT.,t INVENTORY- NAHM OF-LOCAL11Y PATCHUSEY- 2. COUNTY SUFFoLk 41 0 _______ 3t.NAnE OF PLANT PATC-HUVUE __Y At PLANT NO, 2 -__ S -TYPE OF PLANT IYLLAGE 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LONG ISLAND SOUND E.NVIRONMENTAL REGION RONKONKOHA-I1 8 ..LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY- 9, #COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE S___ EPAR -ATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES YES ______ It .v.PLANT GRADE R 12. CHIEF OPEHATOR GRADE 3 3 31L.ASS5STANT OPERATOR - 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1927 L A5,-.YEAR LATEST IiAJOR IMPROVEMENTS 4951 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 5000 _. 17a�__OEStGN FLOH (100 OFGAL0i 5000 O3 18s TREATNENT UNITS PRELIMINARY aARSCNEEl_& -RlTCMAmjER -- PRIMARY SETTLING TANm AECHs SLUDGE COLL. INTERMEDIAtr SECONDARY TERTIARY. CHLORINATION POS CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIDS s HOR U IACHAGEI LSURfLACE AIERS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY MOLDING DIGESTION ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONrSEPARATLtDIGESTERS DENATERING MECHN UENATERING'-VAC, FILTRATION. DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO PUBLIC AS 50IL CUNOITIONLR -------------Qi&STREAH.TYPE. rjuE.S 21, STREAM CLASS 0 -. _ . 22,-RECEIVING iIATFR A MILE .PT-ct* pATCHDUUE CREE E9 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS - __ 24s___A0DITlONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS ___ ___- 25o OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 3/21/72 26, OPERATING PERMIT .XPIRES ON 3L20/T4 27. ACTUAL FLOO (MMGC0- 02T5 0____ 28_BASES FOR FLOi . METEREU 29. AODEUACY OF CHLORINATION AOEQUATE _-__ 301, HYDRAULIC OVERLOAU Ni 0 31. METERING - SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT --- ......... OPERATIONAL RESULTS ----------- ! 0 -- PERMIT LIITS INFI, EFFLUENT - PERCENT __VIOLa- SA .PLE3 X1/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L La/OAY REMOvAL TION 13 f. -399. 196. 44950.9 EhVIR, CONS* --_____ 5.5. - - 235t .9,0 22' 58St _____ IR..CO _____ SET, S.o 10*0 0.1 99.9 ENVIK. CONS, PO TOTAL 11.3 _ 7___ 16_37.0 ENYIRCONS_ N TOTAL 14.64 12.72 29 13.0 ENVIRm CONS. 0! * GIVEN IN ML/L -_ -'._HILE POINTS TO NEAREST-TENTH - I- �-�-----~~--�-r~,s.~--rr--� -- -3~�E-28 E-28 o ------- ---��-- ------ -------.-. ___ _ _ ----- --_____� -----.1912 CFEB) MUNI.CIPAL.SiTont INVENTORY..- AL.NAME OF_-OCALI OCEAJ-jH V 2. COUNTY SUFFOLK 4? ~t ___ 3,1_ NAME OF PLANT _ !OCEAN OEACH1 V 4, PLANT NO* 5 -5.- TYPE OF PLANT VILLAGE 6. DRAINAGE RASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LOgN ISLAND SOUND It ENVIRONHENTAL REGION-..ONKONKONA-t- St LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY O ~~~ _~_ c9v-.COLLEUTION SYSTEH TYPE ____ SEPARATE ( 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES ND .I1.. PLANT GRADE R 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 13g.-SSIZTANT OPERATOR I t 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 19ir 15, YEAR LATEST HAJOR IMPROVEMENTS 1950 _( 164 TR113UTARY POPULATION 11000 AT.- DESIGN FLOW (100S OF GALel- 5090 2 18 TREAT'ENT UNITS PRELIMINARt RARL-SCNCEE1 PRIMARY SETTLING TAtiz MECH# SLUU0E COLL. * T~~~~NTERiIEDIATE SECONDARY TERTIARY CHLORINATION B0TH PHE t POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL Of ..b-U1Ds ..LDRUI I.QSHE E A. iATERS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS __________PRELIMINARY. DIGESTION ANAEROdIC DIGESTIONCSEPARATE OIGESTERS DEWATERI ~ ~ nR YING 50 DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BURIALR INCL SAZNITARY LANDFILL 20.QSIREAM TYPE- -D AL 21, STREAM CLASS A O 2 ____2,RECEIVING HATER C MILE PFT,* GREAT SOUTHBAT 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINI'd N CONTINUOUS _ 24,- ADDITIONAL EFFL-j' T LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERHIT ISSUEO ON 5/12/55 2�_f OPERATING PERAIT EXPIRES _ON 27. ACTUAL FLON (MGO) .324 _24 OASES FOR FLOA NETEREU 29, ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEUUATE J30. HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD 31, METERING mSENAAE FLOw EFFLUENT -Oft ----l --- OPERATIONAL RESULTS ------------ RT J LINITS ___ EFFLUENT - --.PERCLIO- LA-SAMPLES- MG/L La/OAY MG/L NG/L. LBUOAT REMOZL TIUN 0 eja~o. 8Q. 4 ITi 31z ENVIR, CONS. --- ----Sgt 1Q--.ti .0 I 1a Ii 1.___ ___ E N V I R ,-C 0 N S a SET#S.. 4A.5 Of 9631. ENVIK. CONS. N" TOTAL N- TOTAL o P*-IVEN IN ML/L ---A'il~ILFOINISJQNEAREST--TE.MT--L --~'~` -'-L-r1-~n -2- 9-- a- - E-29 0. --- ------ -.--19T2 .(FEB) MUNICIPAL S.T*Wv INVENTORY 4. KAHE.-CF-LOCALITY BROKKAVK-7 II 2r~~~2 COUNTY tUFFOLK 47 f~ ___ 3,AH~E OF PLANT mOLOACOIK s6 AtPLANT NO# to ..___ -TYPE OF PLANT COUNT'MOISTRICT OR O!NERSHIP-- 0�Z6 DRAINAGE H1ASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LONG ISLANQ SOUND __________TEN~vIRoNENTAL-REGION RONK0?NKOMA-l- 5. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY __.__ 9aCOLLECTZUN SYSTEM TYPE---______ SEPARATE ( 10. SIUNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES No -. _ I ____ 11 PLANT QRADE . 12.. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 3..ASSISTANT UPEeAATUR tIA YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTEO D966 o -----15t-YEAR LATEST NA4JOR IMPROVENENTA 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 1200 ATI-OESI GN FLOA (100S.-OF-GAL. 7200 18. TREATmENT UNITS PRELIRINAE0 ARSCREEN -.COMMItOR PRIMARY SETTLING TAN1- 4ECH. SLUDGE COLL, INTERHEDIATE SECONDARY HIGH RATE TR1V.ALIHG FILTER TERTIARY (0%" C) CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL QFLIQUIDS - 19a SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELINIHARY ROLDIR1 DIGESTION DENATEMINQ SLDESAJNE DISPOSAL UF SLUDG E SCAVENGER 2_28. STREAH.TYPE- GROUND *21 STREAM CLASS A O - 22s RECEIVING 'ATER & MILE PT-,** ROUND WATER G.StBAY 23. pERIOD OF CHLORINATIaN CONTINUOUS * _ 24s,_.ADDITIONAL EFFLUEiNT LImITS.-_ 25a OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 4/11/71 26. OPERATING PERMIT LAPIRESON 113 /3T3 21. ACTQAL FLON tHGD) 8.053 24, BASES FOR FLO" METERED 29. ADEQUACY OF ChLORINATION ADETERTE 3Qv-.HYDRAULIC- OVERLOAU qn 31. METERING - SEXAGE FLON' EFFLUENT --a ...------ OPERATIONAL RESULTS ---- ------- PERMIT.LIMITS .Z lNF.. EFFLUENT --?ERCENT~.--IOLA- !.5AmPLES kG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/OAY. REMO.AL TION BY O - a-ots. 2ii. 123. 0 54 413? PLANT RECORD 1991 A 16.6 ____ 6 __ % 0 PLANT- RECORD __ SET. S.* 8.9 0.3 96,16 PLANT RECORD 0P- TOTAL ______ 27,5 .-. 28.5 11 1,0 _ ESVIN, CONS 5 It____ n eTOTAL 56#66 52.24 23 7.0 ENVIR. CONSs 0 * GIVEN IN ML/L Mt NILE POINTS-TO NEAREST .TERTH E-30 -.1,72PT AES)-MUNICIPAL .SqTN, INVENTORY- to-NAME Of. LOCALITt HUNTNGTN-.T 2. COUNTY 'SUFFOLK 41 O - _______ ~.3 NAME OF PLANT. STRATMOR HUNT- ( 4. PLANT NO. 11 _____ P OF PLANT -PRIVATE SENERAGE DISPOSAL CORP, DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LONG ISLAND SOUND C It ENVIRONMENTAL. REGION RaONNKOMA-1 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT SUFFOLK COUNTY * _~~__ 9~ CO.LECTION SYSTEM TYPE_ __ SEPARATE _ 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL 4ASTES NO �1 ___-11 PLANT GRAaE 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 ( 13c-ASSISTANT OPENATOR.. a 14, YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1968 O 15,YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS ( 16, TRI811TARY POPULATION 808 7I~-..DESIGN. FLOR (1005 OF-GAL-I 0360 - 8, TREATMENT UNITS - PRELIIRNARy RHINUTOR aARMtNUAtRLY -~~~ ~PRIMARY INTER,-!EDIATF SECONGARY EXTENDED AERATION * TERTIARY -. - ~AGOHft CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF- LIGUIDs ) 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS O~ _________________ REtLIMINART- 14OIiING DIGESTION DENATERING Q -- * � DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE SCAVENGER 20, STREAM.TYPE A GROUND 21. STREAM CLASS A O 22. RECEIVING WATER & MILEPT.** - R I TO ATLAjN~jIIVQC-N 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24.-ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS -25, OPERATING PER.MIT ISSUED ON 10/. 5/67 26! OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRESON � I 5/17 271 ACTUAL FLOH (MGD) .162 28,-BASES FOR FLO$i METEREO 29, ADEQUACY OF CNLORINATIDN ADEQUATE 30. HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD O-31, METERING a SEwAGE FLON WE IR EFFtUENT .. OPERATIONAL RESULTS-- ------ PERMIT LIMITS. INFt _ EFFLVENT PEEWT..UIDLA-SAMPLES MG/L LB/DAY HG/L MG/L LB/OAY REMO AL TION by 0 8.0,0S 20.0 39 1651 PLANT RECORD S---- * St .240 4f 0A4 �A * P CaLANRECORO________ SET. 6,* -P- i0TOTAL - * TOTAL o '; oGIVEN' IN ML/N ii ----~-tAYLELOlI{TS TQ2INEARt.STAIEnrT E-31 8..._ ~~-- .0 * 19?2. (FES) nUNICIPAL-.SBT.N, INVENTORY i. NAME.ODFLQCALITY HENPSTED-1 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 J.3.NAME OF PLANT TrHiIINATQR___ 4, PLANT NO, 25 _ SrLTYPE OF PLAVT COUNTY DISTRICT OR O-,NERSHIP 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LOaN ISLANU SOUND Zs ENVIRONMENTAL.REGION tONKONKOMA-I a. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY 0 _____.9 LCOLLECTION SYSTEM4 TYPL __ _ __EPARATE 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES - NO IlI.PLAt4T GRADE 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 3 Ila.tASSISTANT uPERATU-N 14. YEAR PLANT C3NSTRUCTED 1963 I 15s.-YEAR LATEST HAJOR IFPROVERENTS C 16s TRIBUTARY POPULATION 30 IA7.DESlGN FLOW 0005 OF-aAL,.l O Ia TREATMENT UNITS PRELVAINARY 9AR-.CReE PRIMARY INTERMEDIATE ( SECONDARY EXTENDED AERATIDN TERTIARY LAGOON. SPCHLORINAT ION POST CHLURINATID?4 19a SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS RIC GJ RALi. OD7 PRELIMINARY DIGESTION DEOATERING DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE SCAVENGER tlL-- 6 TRE A N-T YP E __ TIDAL 21s STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A ___22, RECEIVING WATER & MILE PT.** FREEPOT CREEK A 23. PERIOD Of CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24_, ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIHITS - 25s OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 26, OPERATING PERMIT EXPJ.ESlN 27. ACTUAL FLOW (MGD) 0.001 C ~ 28. BASES FOR FLOA OTHER 29. AOEOUACT OF CHLORIMATICN ADEQUATE 30: .HYDRAULIC UVERLOAU 31. METERING , SEmAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ............ FLER UET LIMITS OPERATIONAL RESULTi EFFLUENT __.PERCENT__IvOLA__SANPLES MG/L LB/DAY MG/L NG/L LB/OAl REMO rAL TION BY -. - 8.0.0. 350. 30~ ENVIR. CONS, 5.5,f250. ..-.. 65s2 _ ENVIRLCONS. SET. So* 134.0 Moog 87.2 ENVIR. CONS. ID TOTAL 7, NI~N TOTAL GIVEN IN ML/L k-AILE.-POIHTS TO NEAREST..-TENTH E-32 1 972UE8l~BL#1'N IC IPAL S TrW I,AKVENTQR 1-.NAME OF-LOCALITY F.VEEP0RL 2. COUNTY NASSAU 28 3 #NAME OF PLANT FRT v 4. PLANT NO. . 7 m t TYPE OF PLANT VILLAGE .6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LON!! ISLAND SOUND 7. -ENVIRONMENTAL-REGIOH ROONKNKOMA-1 Be LICAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNT" *�9 OLLCOLECTION SYSTEM TYPE . - SEPARATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES 1it.-PLANT GRACE t2. CHIEF OPERATOR GRACE 2 � I 5U-A SSISTANT OPERATOR. 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1927 ISA.YEAR -LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS i J961 16t TRIBUTARY POPULATION 34200 � It7 -OESIGR FLOW (1D0S0 OFGAL&-3 40000 18d' TREATMENT UNITS RPELIMINARY "KKMINUTOR--GRLT-CHAm4ER PRIMARY SETTLING'TANi MECH. SLUDGE COLL. INTERmEODIAT. SECONOARY HIGH RATE TRIC4LING FILTER TERTIARY - C . CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIDS -ARTERscHSaREoRFtME.Rs .19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY DIGESTION ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONMSEPARATE DIGESTERS DERATERING--- C . DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO ANOTHER SoTsiN 0 - T 8RE A HTYPE TIOAL 21. STREAM CLASS D '.C 22. RECEIVING WATER & MILEPI,** FREEPORT CREEx 23, pERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS ic ?4#-.ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LImITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 7/28/59 _________26.OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRE$ ON 27. ACTUAL FLOW (MGD) 4.060 C: _________28.BAUES FOR FLOW __ METERED 29. AoEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE -30v-HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD Y!S 31 . METERING - SEWAGE FLOW .(.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I EFFLUENT I--*-or-.c OPERATIONAL RESULTS . . . . . . C 'PERMIT LI1ITS INF. FFLfLENT--PERCENT VIOLA--SAMPLES MGOL LB/DAY MG/L HG/L LB/DAY REMOvAL tION By C B.0 Go 173. 74. 2505 57.2 PLANT RECORD S167, 3a.2 21396Za3 PLAKt-AKRECORD SET. S, t 10,5 0.1 99.9 PLANT RECORD (.�. P!..DTTA L 9,0 5t .10 64 -.Q1 E2VIR..CONS, __________ No TOTAL 43.77 33,04 I lia 24*0 ENVIR. CONS. C * GIVEN IN ML/L mjLL--aI 1.3-0-N ARE 5 T-3T E-33 UCC ~-__ __ 0----2~ - --1 ~ t972aP3ELIIjUNICzpAL_5 .T, W1KVE&TORY ~~.KH~TIC~t HEHP5TEDJ rtr 2. COUNTY .NASSAU 28 ___ ____ NAE OF PLANT- 1CCLO0 015 --2 4. PLANT NO. St-.TYPE OF PLANT COUNTY DISTRICT OR O..NERSHIP---- 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LONG ISLAND SOUND '7 2 ENVIRONMENTAL -REGION RONKONKOMA-1 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY i-CoLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE SEPARATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTE S YES Us1_.PLANT GRADE 12t CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 134-ASSISTANT UPERATOR-- 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1951 1IYt._EAR. LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEiMEN TS 961 I16. TRI8UTARY POPULATION 459000 .AZLDE;1 ESIGN FLOW (iOS._UfGAL-) AD000 - 16 TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY Q&RACREEN GRIT3CHKAIEF PRIMARY SETTLING TAN,( 44ECHm SLUDGE COLL. X X!?TER-EDLATF SECONDARY ACTIvATED SLUDGE TERTIARy-- C CHLORINATION BOTH PRE 4 POST CHLORINATION nISPOSALQOF_.LIUIOs bORL1rISCHAR.GLIOSURAcA iRs 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY HIVCKENING-1-HOLOING- DIGESTION ANAExuUIC DIGESTIONtSEpARATt DIGESTERS DEWATERING- DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA .20 STREARTYPF T IDAL 21, STREAM CLASS C ________22jRECEIVING -WATER & HMILEF- RYN1OLD CHANNEL a 23*2 pERI00 OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS ?c 4.ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMIT.$ -C 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON ________26.tQPERATING PERMIT EXPLitS ON 21' ACTUAL FLOW (AGO) 654000 C 28, BASES FOR FLOW KIE-TERED .29 AOEQUACY Or CHLORINATION ADEQUATE _QLHYDRAULIC OVERLOAD yrs C Ji1 METERING a SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT .....---1-a--- OPERATIONAL RESULTS -------------- C PE9M I I M I T -INF . _E fL E N T- ___PERCENT -I0L A-SAMiPLES XG/L La/DAY HG/L AG/L LB/DAY REMO AL TION 13 8 0.D, 182. 21. 0 I 11384 90.17 PLANT RECORD oS a S - . ~ ,_k a 2 0 A l 92z4 PLiAN LR EC fOall SET* SON 12.5 .I 99.9 ENVIR. CONS* C 7 ~ ~AOTL 13 a i 3,3 17 85-7 410 EN___________ No TOTAL 54,61 24095 1352t 54.0 ENYIR, CONS* * GIVEN IN ML/L 0 tYILEJ P IN T J-1 aji EARf 5 T--EN T, E-34 i~~~~~~~~~~~~~I A 1 4972CFEB 3.M-UNIC IPAL-S&T T.Ka -INVENT ORY I MIKE--II" OCALI-Y -.iGACKV 2. COUNTY N AZ S s0u 28 3&.NANE F_ PLANt LPN _EAVALC 4. PLANT NO. 3 � --------. --5. TYPE OF PLANT- CITY--- 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN * LONr ISLAND SOUND * �7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGION RONKONKOMA-1 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY Zi �Br CO LLECTION SYSTEM TYPE.. SEPARAIE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO .FI L oPLANT GRADE - - -. ** 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 Z.IIJASSISTAN1-OPERATOUR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1952 1-5.mEAR-LATEST MAJOR IMPROOIEMENiS 1I65 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 35000 4.ZL DESIGN FLOk C1OOS-OZGA~t. 61600 Ig8 TREATMENT UNITS i ~~~~~RLBIH~INARr SR.SCR~EENACONNlNfhUZIURr-LtLLCJ4A~FlFR 'PRIMARY SETTLING TAN.,a MECH. SLUDGE COLL. !RTERMEOTATF SECONDARY HIGH HATE TNIC80LING FILTER TERTIARY- *. .� CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF--LIQUIDS SRJS CHARGLI0DiUREAC i:Atf S 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS P.BELIMINARY DIGESTION ANAEROIC DIGESTIONISEpAHATE DIGESTERS cDEnATERING_ DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA I 20L-STIREARi-TYPE 'tnAL 21. STREAM CLASS B 22, RECEIVING WATER & MILE PtA�* - REYNOLDS CHANNEL 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24. ADDITIONAL EFFLUEN.T LI4ITS- ic, 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 6/22/07 26( OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON OZ22/72 2?. ACTUAL FLOO (NOD) 6.070 C at__2 ASES FOR FLON M METERED 29. ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE * $0.DLHYDMAULIC OVERLOAU - YES C J31. METERING a SEAAGE FLOW PARSHALL FLUME EFFLUENT .e, OPERATIONAL RESULTS -------- a--- C� PERRIT- LIMIT S Fir. EFFLUENT _ PERCENT ilOLA-.!_SAHPL E S NGIL LB/DAY NG/L MG/L LB/DAY REHOvAL 7ION DM C. .. B,80D, 136, 24. 1375 _ 2.4 PLANT RECORT 155 3 7-1 1 4b5 lIA- 2 PLANUTRECORO_ SET. Sao 7.1 0.2 97.1 PLANT RECORD ____ _.P-TOTAL_ ____ * N TOTAL 29.72 33.12 1897 0.8 ENVIR, CONS. G GIVEN IN NL/L *CM~lLLY p OINTS.XQNEZARL&LITEETH E-35 * .1----- a-1-------"-- 1972 LIFEBLMUNIC IPAL rZtWI. ZLYEMTOR Y l. NAME OF-LOCALITY HEnPSTEO-T 2. COUNTY NASSAU 2. * NAME OF PLANT W BCN5S A4. PLANT NO. - 9 ____ TYP OF PLANT -- TOWN DISTRILT 6. DRAINAGE HASIN ATLANTIC OCE&N - LON(, ISLAND SOUND 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REGION nONKOMA-I It LOcAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNT4- 9*.COLLECTION.SYSTEN TYPE -AEPARAL-T- 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO * Z Zi-PLANT GRADE 9k 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 2 13A--ASISTANT OPERATOR 14, YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED j1927 -1-.-EAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROYEMENTS 96 Q 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 13000 ~7. fESION FLOW UOO5OF.GAt_*' 10-i TREATHENT UNITS PRELIMINARY CAR-SCKHE.L- I-T-CHAg4,ER PRIMARY SETTLING TAN4- mECHa SLUDGE COLL, NMTERmZO1ATE- SECONDARY NIGH RATE TRICKLING FILTER TERTIARY _____ CHLORINATION POST CHLORINA-ITGN DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIDS DROSURE-AC HARE-EAC---SRS C 19, SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY OIGESTION ANAEROBIC DIGESTION:SEPARATE DIGESTERS DEIAWERIOF SLUDGE 1ECH&- DEWATERI1.1"G, tAC, FILTRATION DISPOSAT OF SLUDGE BURIAL/TO PUiLIC AS SOIL CONDITIONER 20. S-T.REAX-T YPE TTUA- 21. STREAM CLASS B ________22IRECEIVING WATER & MILEPT1!.* QZEYNOLOS CHANNEL * . B23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS ________24. ADOITIONAL EFFLUENT LINITS 25, 'OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 11/17/9 _______2_2 6OpERATING PERMIT EXPIFE5-N 27. ACTUAL FLOW (CGD) 0.599 C . BASES FOR FLON m;,tEREO 29, ADEQUACY OF CHLORINATION AOEQUATE 3-0 HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD 31. METERING - SEXAGE FLOW -EFFLUENT � OPERATIONAL RESULJ -S � --- --- C PFERHILLIMITS _ INF, __EFFLUENT __PERCEHTvIOLA.SAMPLES KM/L LB/DAY MG/L NG/L LB/DAY REMO;,AL TION 8Y CI D.O.D. 192 10too 49 94.a PLANT RECORD L .3 .19 2-2Z 9 1333 PLANT-RECORO SET. St* 11.0 0,1 9911 PLANT RECORD (- P ~TOTAL E14NVI1 _______ -52,O LNVIRfCONSt _ Me TOTAL 33.a23 12.86 64 61.0 ENVIR, CONS. * GIVEN IN ML/L M * IL YDOI - lTQ(NEARF.STTENT,4 E-36 * �~~~~~~~~~972....FE8)i4UNIC IPALS.-ST.r. IKtNUTORY. Is NAME. OF-LOC ALITY<7'-' LANRENgr; v 2. COUNTY - NASSAU 26 3.XNAME OF PLANT - L A WRE 4. PLANT NO* a 5. _TYPE OF PLANT V uILLAGE. - _ 6. DRAINAGE BASIN *ATLANTIC OCEAN - LON, ISLAND SOUND 7. ENVIRONMENTAL-REGION RORKONKOMA-i 69 LOCAL HEALTH.UNIT NASSAU COUNTY ______9. COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE_ REPARATE 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES K O lit-FLANT GRADE a 12,. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 5 13&-ASSISTANT OPERATOR - 149 YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1933 15s t YEAR LATEST MAJOR 1HPRnVEHRtTS 126. .16 TRIBUTARY POPULATION 5300 .1 1cDESIGN FLOW clOOQ5OF-GAL&I I ~ .O4O 18a TREATMENT UNITS PRELIMINARY - RRREEN, C0.YHI NU TQRj-&-GR LL CKA MHER -- F PRIMARY SETTLING TAN.w asECH# SLUUGE COLL, i . !INTERMEIATEi SECONDARY HIGH HATE TRICiLIXG FILTER TERTIARY . - CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF--LIQUIDS sjj9ft~piMAgGEIO~URFC.~ EfiS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY DIGESTION . ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONISEPARATE DIGESTERS DERATERING\ _____ fRYIN E ____BEV DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO PUBLIC AS SOIL CONDITIONER 2 o STREAM .TYPE TIDAL 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A 22. RECEIVING OATER 9 MILE PTzh* BANNISTER CREEI 23. pERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24Qk_'ADITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25o OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 4/To 262-_PERAING PEF -EXP IITS-0 27. ACTUAL FLON (MGO) 0.758 : _________28#BASES FOR FLON METERED 29. AOEQUACY OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE _0_2__3tYDRAULIC OVERLOAU -- Nn c -31. METERING a SEMAGE FLOM EFFLUENT , OPERATIONAL RESULS ------ C FERMIT-LIKITSIS INF,_ EFFLUENT _PERCENT-_-ZIOLA..SAMPLES NG/L LB/DAY G/GL 14G/L LB/UAY REMU4,AL TION 6Y (.. B..o~, .104 13. 4 82 87. 5 VLANT RECORD _________ 2 0 1 8 Esta1t 7 0 PLANCLREC _RO SET. 5.' 61 0O1 t 98.4 PLANT RECORD _ Pw TOTAL.- 1 . . 6 03q - N-9i.4C3N_ _ _ NoK- TOTAL GIVEN IN ML/L ** KlLY__eOlH'INTS..iiE~ARESLJEMT-37 E-37 ! h~fOr N QLJOCAIVEL CEDRHRST V 2. COUNTY - NASSAU 28 : 3.<NAHE.OF PLANT CEOANHURS3T 4. PLANT NO. 54-TYPE OF PLANT -- VILLAGE. 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN * LON.. ISLAND SOUND 7mENVlRON?4ENTAL_.REGIOR& ASSKOAU OUNTY 6. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY 9&C COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE- qEPARATF 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES No Ila - PLANT GRADE 12. CHIEF OPERATUR GRADE 3 13. AS5ISTANT OPERATOR. 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1934 1 J5tYEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS 4 96. 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 6930 ItLDESIGN FLOK -O S(OLGA LI 100,00 It. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIHINNARL SACRENCOHMINU.TRRILHAHaER * . PMARY . SETTLING TAN*w AECH. SLUDGE COLL. TNTERHEOIATE SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRIC,<LZNG. FILTER TERTIARY - CHLORINATION BOTH PRE i POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQVIDS w HGI TDSURFACLLE.R_ 19. SLUDGE HANULING UNITS PRELIMINARY. DIGESTION ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONeSEpARATE DIGESTERS b~~~~~~~ DOSATERING D nRYING BED_ DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE qURIALw INCL, SANITARy LANDFILL 2Q*STREANTYPE. TIDAL 21. STREAM CLASS -SPECIAL-A 22. RECEIVING WATER & MILE PTi,** MUTTS CREEK 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24. -ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LINITS IC_25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 4/18/67 26. OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 4/16/72 21. ACTUAL FLOW (MGO) .961 28. BASES FOR FLOW __uTARv ZOPULATION 29i ADEOUACT OF CHLORINATION ADEQUATE Q tHYDlRAULIC OVERLOAJ - C . 31. METERING a SEWAGE FLOW * i EFFLUENT -.0000.00 .... OPERATIONAL RESULTS ---------- :; PERHIT-LIHZTS __INF__ EFFLUENT__. PERCENT I1O3 L AvS LES XG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L LB/OAT RE90,;AL TION 8y s.0,to 165. 28. 224 63.3 PLANT RECORD _________S..St t65L2I5( 5 2Q_84 P-LANILA RECORDO_ _ _ SET. S.' 10.0 $I 99.9 PLANT RECORD . TOTAL -11 08-- _______ 52 -_ -4 4 a q_ __ E N V I R ..CO ___ N _ N- TOTAL 380404 25*00 200 16.0 ENV~IR. CONS. a GIYEN yIN LI tiL-ILE-POINTSAOA{EAREST-IENRH E-38 '9TaCFEEB)WxUNICIPAL5JIT.I,..ZHVEFHIY t. NAMEIF.1A OCAlIIY HEMPSTEDLT.r 2g COUNTY NASSAU 28 3, NAME OF PLANT -H08O5.DA 4* PLANT NO. la Ss--TYPE OF PLANT. -OUNTY DISTRICI OR 04.NERSHIP- 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LON,- ISLAND SOUND 7. EHYIRONkENTALREGION PONKONKOMA-1 be LOCAL HEALTH UNIT NASSAU COUNTY __________9..COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE_ S EPA RATE 10, SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES NO ____l PLANT GRADE a 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRACE 2 131 ASSISTANT OPERATOHC 14, YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1963 A5, iYEAR LATEST MAjOR.-IMPRVEMEENlT V6 o TRIeUTARY POPULATION 6000 Ut -DESIGN FLOW (10OS-OF-GAL&I 5-0 Do 18. TREATMENT UNITS i; PBELIEINARY t G?.LTCHAGtavR PRIMARY SETTLING TAN.- HwE RN SLUDGE COLL* INTERMEDIATF -SECONDARY HIGH RATE TRICALt(.G FILTER * c ~ 1[RTIARY. CHLORINATION - POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF-LIQUIO-5 SHOREP1MA&~ApRFA E IATRS 19, SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS -PREL I MINARY 1- DIGESTION ANAEROtfIC DIaESTIZN'SEPARATE DIGESTERS -4nENATERING (: n�; t QISPOSAL OF SLUDGE TO ANOTHER S#Tww ,1L '; .2~sTri~ FtA.-TYPE -TIAL 1 a ZTRDM CLASS : B ICZeRECEIVING HATER 93MILE..P-T-, JAMAICA BAY 23. PERaDU Or CHLORINATION CONTINUOUS 24.v_-.ADD3'TIONAL EFFLUE-T LIMITS 7 25. ORGERATING PERMIT ISSUED O1. 61OPERAIING OERMI NI.ESN .Pw~r AFSUAL FLON (MNGIl 1670 C7 ____2SA1 FOR FLO*- 4 &tETERED 3 A3 29. ADiUACY OF. CHUrAINATION ADEQUATE _______r~D. lI'.Dfi~ULIC OVERLnIA *. P iXifRING - SE-nA! Z LOHfU C I EFFLUEVY .... OPERATIONAL RESULTLTS ERMILA I T-0 VJ' . --]f __2EFFLLJENT PER C ENT- U OL A 5 A4? LES b G/L lAVt.D 'r HG/L. LB/DAT REMOl 4AL TION a Y * . . 4p~a~l, .. ~.27-4 16. .222 911B PLANT RFCORC -am 2 0 i.4- I9A 4 RLANLRECOaO SET. S.~b 1Dc~SI 0.1 9909 PLANT RECORD i so_9n~ UT L. N- TiuTAL i , .SS75 .32000 445 Sao ENVIR, CONS. *GIVEN IN I1L4, 9 . . -BfYI~ n-39 E-39 o -... ----- ---- -_ ----.------- - - - -. * .__ __~~_ .1972 .--FE8) MOUNICIPAL.SaTsWe.-IN'IENTURY I. . 1L NAME-OF-.LOCALLTY NEN_-ORK II 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 56 Og 3 __.3a_~ NAME OF PLANT ROCKAWAY- 4. -PLANT NO. to TYPE OF PLANT CITY 6. DRAINAGE UASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN - LONI ISLAND SOUND 71xENVIRONMENTAL REGION s-Y 8. LOCAL HEALTH-UNIT O ~~ ~9~__.31-_COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE 0_____ I N E 0 10. SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES 11.- PLANT GRADE O4 -- 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE _13.ASSISTANT OPERATOR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1952 _-15L EARLATEST MAJOR IMPRtYEMENTS 1961. 16* TRIBUTARY POPULATION 70000 17.- DESIGN FLOW (1005- OFGAL.A sOOOQ 18. TREATMENT UNITS PRELIAINARY PEAEftAT.1 0 N C REEN"Ul__CHABaE'R lif PRIMARY * U ItNTER�EOCIATF RO0 -IF O-ERA-TIO SECONDARY ________TERTIARY CHLORVIATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF.LIQUID5 sHEUISCHA6GEJTLSVREACE.�IiRS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY -THICKENING_ A HOLDING_____ DIGESTION ANAEROWIC DIGESTION(SEpARATE DIGESTERS# _________DENATERING - DISPOSAL OF S LUDGE BARGE TO SEA 2O1.STREAM TYPE T TAL_ 21% STREAM CLASS SPEClALwA 0 ~ _~___22, _RECEIVING WATER ' A ILE P-T.. A A IJAICA IfAY 23., PERIOD OF CHLORINATION - SEASONAL 24, ADDITIONAL EFFLUE-NT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 3/10/59 26. OPERATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 27, ACTUAL FLOW (MGD) 19g300 I O -_ _ 2s-BASES FOR FLOW R'iEERED ( 29. ADEVUACY OF CHLORINATION *. ADEGUATE -a . - 303 t__HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD NO 31. METERING - SEWAGE FLOW EFFLUENT ............. OPERATIONAL RES-ULTS ------�------- PERHIT.LINITS INF..* .EFFLUENT _ PERCEVNTVIOLA.__SAMiLE5 XG/L LB/DAY NG/L MG/L LB/DAY REMOaAL TION BY O - 8.0 861 36. 5794 5a.2 PLANT RECORD 5di 5. a 4 26. a9._198_7__. 6141 PLANT-RECORD SET. S.* 82. 8.5 89,6 OTHt. AGENCY Po TOTAL. a1 _40 ____ 643 __.0l ____PLANT RECORD N- TOTAL 17.10 16.30 2623 4.0 PLANT RECORD o * GI~VE "IK4WL/L I- N --- II --------'-- XILE_~OL PDTS J0 ARE;SL1ErTu -- I----3----aa - - ,-- -- E-40 O ...___. ._I- --. -- -- -- ------ - .19?2 .. FEB)3MUNICIPAL_ SoT*Wa. *NVEN�ORy 1. NAME0_ZLDCALLU - NEMIOR~LC. 2. COUNTY M Y CITY 58 31..NAME OF PLANT _ IAMAICA . PLANT NO. 6 St-,--TYPE OF PLANT .CITY o 6. DRAINAGE BASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN LONG ISLAND SOUND * L ERYIRONHEHlTAL REGION y 't T~yL 2 et LOCAL HEALTH UNIT O ____ 9._OLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE. _C__________MINED 10. SIGNIFiCANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES Il.. PLANT GRADE O~ 12. CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE 1 I ________13tASSISTANT UPERATOR 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1943 0. ___.___ 1..EAR LATEST NAJOR IHPRDVENT &.1964. ( l6. TRIbUTARY POPULATION 585000 ..17. DESIGN FLOl (1003 OF- GAL,) 1000000 18. TREATkENT UNITS P.RELIKINARY RAR.. SCREEN, INUTORs.CRIT.CHAHtA PRIMARY SETTLING TAN- , ECH, SLUOGE COLL, TnTERPEOIATE . SECONDARY ACTIVATED SLUDFG CHLORINATION CPSTC8LORINA'GN DISPOSAL. OF.-LIQUIDS AORLUIS.CHARIJOS[RJEACE AIER5 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIHINARY THICKENINQ. -WONG. __ A OIGESTION ANAEROUIC DIGETEIONCSEpARAT. DIGESTERS DENATERINQG ( Q DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE eARGE TO SEA 20 & T REAK_1YPE 7IOAL- 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIALA __ _~____ 22. _ RECEIVING nATER! & nILE Pi* BERGEN BASIN ( 23.- PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL . .. 24c__.AQUITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS 25. OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 11/ 9/60 ___ 26t._OPEdATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON -s Zsi27, ACTUAL FLON (sGD) 92.600 0 __'_28 BASES FOR FLD4 PUQMPOPEREATION TIME 29. AOE4UACY OF CHLORINATION - 30s HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD -4 31 METERING m SEmAGE FLOW EFFLUENT .Ilso~~'OPERATIONAL R1ESuLTS ............... MG/L LB/DAY NG/L MG/L La/OAT REMUVXiL TION by O ~~~ x~~;o.D, ~~1344 5 4 i f i-9 i-S PLANT-.RECORD SET# S'A 224s 20s3 9 0*9 OTHLR A'GENCY 0~ -.PoP TOTAL ~(__..69 30_~12409 ?LANT.RECOROD No TOTAL '26.00 31.90 24689 O.OQ PLANT RECORD 0' ~~~r--G~iIEN IN NL/L ,~ ------tCMILE.OINTS TO.-NEAREST-TENPi E-41 ---- 1972 CFEB) MUNICIPAL. So TO INVENTORY.- NHAME OF-LOCALLTY NEW.-YURK-C 2. COUNTY m Y CITY 58 __IL3__.NAM OF PLANT *�6DLNARD At PLANT NO, 7 -5,-TYPE OF PLANT CITY__ ____ O 6. DRAINAGE 8ASI4 ATLANTIC OCEAN * LONG ISLAND SOUNO 7. FNVIRONMENTAL.REGION WC1Tt~ 8. LOCAL HEALTH UNIT 0- _COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE. I__COMjINEG 10. -SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL WASTES YES - ..__ A1_itPLANT GRADE GRa 12, CHIEF OPERATOR GRADE I tA.3A _ASSITANT OPERATOR - 1; 14, YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 19A4 _ _ 15. YEAR LATEST HA-JOR 14PROVYmENTS- 1951 .161 TRIjUTARY POPULATION 316000 .I7. DESIGN FLOX tIOGS OF-.GAL.) 18, TREATmENT UNITS PRELIMINARY REAATIORSAa. SCREaRITCHA8Ls- PRIMARY SETTLING TAN*- MECHg SLUDGE COLL. INTERHEDIATE_ SECONDARY ACTIVATED SLUDGE TERTIARY CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL OF.LIQUIO5 -TREpISFCHAA GLTO.SUJ~CERATERS 19. SLUDGE HANDLING UNITS ?__ RELIMINARY THICKENING DIGESTION ANAERODIC DOlESTION(SEpARATE DIGESTERS DEWATERIING---. DRYING 5ED DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE BARGE TO SEA ______?OSTREAH.TYPE- T1OAl- 21. STREAM CLASS SPECIALmA sO.._.?2.RE OZICEIYING WATER & MILE-P-7,A* JAMAIC A_"AY 23. PERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL �---24,- ADDITIONAL EFFLUENT LIMITS OPERATING PERMIT ISSUED ON 1/23/40 26. OPERATING PERMIT EXPFIES ON 21 ACTUAL FLON (MG) 70.100 ___28,_8ASES FOR FLOA T ________ 29. AOEQUACY OF CHLORINATION INADEQUATE -- .-----0: t HYDRAULIC QVERLOAU -_E_ METERING - SEMAGE FLUX EFFLUENT -.-ft ........ OPERATIONAL RESULTS-0- - -- -- -- PERMIT LIMITS -INFF. .* EFFLUENT - __PERCENT. *4IOLA--SAMPLES. MG/L LB/DAY MG/L NG/L LS/DAY REMO-jAL TION By 0 ?.DO 97. 38. 21046 62,9 PLANT RECORD -.-..---.-.S.S, _________ 111,. *37.Q.21 A1 6 7 '.LLAN T..RECORO SET. St* 160a8 6.3 96.1 OTHtR AGENCY 0 P- TOTAL_ 3.5.... 3.8 .2221 _. 0.0 'LANT.. RECO3O*3 _ - h" TOTAL 17.10 13.70 809 1 9 0 PLANT RECORO * GOIVEN INCML/L -- *t -XILL POINTS. TO -NEARESTTENTH E-42 --. ..I--- .. f1972---CFEB) MUNICIPAL. SaTafle INVENTORY 4.NAME. OF-LOCAL-tTYI *JLC-DR9 "' 2. COUNTY N Y CITY 58 _______3.AE OF PLANT tONEt-SLAND 4. PLANT NO, I 5s-_TYPE (IF PLANT. CITY- 6 DRAINAGE ASIN ATLANTIC OCEAN M LONG ISLAND SOUND 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REGION M CITY-9 as LOCAL HEALTH UNIT O -_ ~~~~~,~~_ 91... COLLECTION SYSTEM TYPE a REIH iN E 0 10a SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL NASTES YES o .~_.......PLAiNT GRADE - 12. CHIEF CPERATOR GRADE I _____3 I..ASSISTANT OPERATOR.. 14. YEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTED 1936 _______154-YEAR LATEST MAJOR IMPROVEiENLTS 1963 16. TRIBUTARY POPULATION 600000 ___ __T.-.DESIGN FLUA (1OOS OF-GAL,' !100000 186 TREATMENT UNITS PRELIRINARY R__SCRErEN"?WT__CHA.MT' PRIMARY INTERMEOIATE DIrIfOAE1RATIO~ SECONDARY TERTIARY_ CHLORINATION POST CHLORINATION DISPOSAL. 0F..LQUIDS HRUSHI1.UFC..~1R 19. SLUOGE HANDLING UNITS PRELIMINARY THIC~ENING. DIGESTION ANAEROBIC DlaESTIONfSEpARATE DIGESTERS - ~~~DEWATERINI3-BAG _________2ODS POSAL OF SLUDGE TO SEA 20o STREAHi TYPE.- TIOAL, 21, STREAM CLASS SPECIAL-A O ______22._RECEIVING MATER & MILE PTO** ROCKAWAY INLET 23. pERIOD OF CHLORINATION SEASONAL S24 ADDITIONAL EFFLUEUT LIMITS_____ o 25. D~~~OERATING PERI-IT ISSUED ON 1-1/209 26, OPEHATING PERMIT EXPIRES ON 27. ACTUAL FLOV CHGO) 91,900 __ 28_ 2 BASES FOR FLO- I4ETERED 29. AOEquACY OF CHLORINATION ADEcUATE 30*.-..HYDRAULIC OVERLOAD 31. METERING a SEWIAGE FLOW EFFLUENT . ..... ------- OPERATIONAL RESUJLTS - -- - --� - -- PERM IT_ L I M ITS____ INF. . EFFLUENT , - -PERCENT-_,, I OLAr-SA mPLE S HG/L LB/DAY MG/L MG/L- LB/JAT REMD,,AL TION by 1 0 8O,.0 132. 56, 42920 57.6 PLANT RECRD - 3?.. ____r 0.A5459. . 7.LANT0.REC_4RD2____9 SET. S,* a898 9.3 89,1 OTHER AGENCY P" TOTAL _ 5.8 4. __ 3602 18 *0,4.. ENVI:. CONS _ No TOTAL 22.80 I1790 13719 21,0 ENVIR, CONS. O Q . +'-OIVEN IN ML/t. -- ----rt . MILLFPOINTS-TI-.TNEARE ST-TESLTE -- - -�-- �----- - -.-~r� ~- - -- - E-43 TOWN OF BABYLON PAGE 1 OF 2 0NU YCRK STATE DEPARTMENT OF EZ'IRONMT~AL CONSERVATION VZIIRONCENAL CONTPOL UNIT STONY BROOK, N.Y. 11794 NOTICE TO ALL STL7LLFISH HARVFSTERS NOTICE OF CONDITION OF ALL SHELLFISHI GROUNIDS LOCATED WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO TtE TOWN-OF BABYLON, StFFOLK COLNTY, STATE OF NEX YORK. Excerpted from Part 41 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Re- gulations of the State of New York. The following is a statement of sanitary condition of shellfish lands in New York State. Notice of changes in classification will be sent to baymen by mail as and when they may occur. Whenever used in this Part 41: (a) the term "mile" refers to statute mile; (b) the term '"onumeat" refers to a permanent post or marker placed on or near the shore by the Department of Environmental Cor.servation to serve as a landmark in establishing the lines of closure. Section 41.3 Shellfish Lands In Suffolk County (a) .The shellfish lands in Suvffolk County, except those listed in sub- division (b)- are in such sanitary cot.dition that shellfish thereon may be taken for use as food, and such lands are designated as certified areas. (b) The following shellfish lands in Suffolk County are in such sanitary condition that shellfish thereon may not be taken for use as food and such. lands are designated as uncertified areas. Town of Babylon Great South Bay 1. All that area, including adjacent creeks and canals, north of a line extending easterly from the southernmost tip of the bulkhead at Unqua Point to the southeastern end of the dock at the Unqua- Corinthian Yacht Club (local landmark). 2. All that area, including adjacent creeks and canals, north of a line extending easterly from the southeastern end of the dock at the Unqua-Corinthian Yacht Club (local landmark) to the southern tip of the easternmost bulkhead at the Amityville Village Beach (local landmark). 3. All that area, including adjacent creeks and canals, lying north of a line extending easterly from the southern tip of the eastern- most bulkhead extending from shore at the Amityville Village Beach (local landmark) to the southern tip of the bulkhead extending - from shore at the foot of Western Concourse at Copiague (local landmark), 4. All that area, including adjacent creeks, rivers and canals, lying north of a line extending southeasterly from the southern tip of the bulkhead extending from shore at the foot of Western Cobcourse at Copiague (local landmark) to a buoy located at the northern edge of the east-west boat channel south of the entrance to Howell Creek, thence continuing easterly along the northern edge of the east-west boat channel, as defined by a series of buoys regularly spaced, to a buoy marking the intersection of said east-west channel with Oak Island Channel, thence continuing easterly along a line as defined by a series of buoys to the southwestern corner of the large con- crete base at the northern end of the Robert Moses Causeway Bridge - located at Conklin Point. Said burvs are of a can type, white and orange in color and have lettered thereon, '".Y.S. CONSV. DEPT., SETLLFISH CLOSURl LINE". F-1 TC(N or 'BA.BYLON PAGE 2 OF 2 Atlantic Ocean 1. All areas of the Atlantic Ocean in the Tbun of B~abylon are certified for the taking of shellfish. Note: All reference points in the Town of Babylon taken from U.S.C. & G.S. Nautical Chart #120-SC dated December, 1971, except as indicated as "local landmark". Ogden Reid 3y: Robert B. Mac Millan Supervisor of Marine *-Environmental Con~trol Dated: Albany, N.Y. - April 8, 1969 As amended thru October 23, 1972 As Amended * ~~1/1/176 STATE LAW PROHIBITS THlE TMtIVG OF SHILLFISR FROM THE UNCZRTIYIED-AP.EAS -OF TFE SHELLFISH LANDS AND WATERS OF THE STATE. if you intend to harvest shellfish from the vaters of any town other than that in which you claim residency, then contact the offices of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at Story Brook and obtain listings of the uncertified areas in that town. F-2 ~ -. '� T:!TN OF BROCKSAVEN PAGE l of 3 I1T YGRK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRPNTENSTAL CONSEIVATION BURSZAU OF SH�LLFISIHERIES- STCRY BRCOK, NU4 YOMK 11794 NOTICE TO ALT, SHELLFISH HARVYSTERS. NOTICE OF CCNDITICN CF ALL ShILLFISH GROUNDS LOCATED TWITHIN OR ADJACENT TO TRE TrWN OF BROCKHAVES, SUFFOLK COLNTY, STATE OF N.3V YOUK. Excerpted from Part 41 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York. The fellowing is a statement of sanitary condition of shellfish lands in Nei York State. Notice of charges in classification will be sent to baymen by mail as and when they may.occur. Whenever used in this Part 41: (a) the term "mile" refers to statute mile; (b) the term "monument" refers to a permanent post or marker placed on or near the shore by the N.Y.S. DenartmInn of Environmental Conservation to s-rve as a landmark in establishing the Liies of closure. Section 41.3 Shellfish Lands in SufIolk County (a) The shellfish lands in Suffolk County, except those listed in sul- division (b) are in such sanitary condition that shellfish thereon may be taken for use as food, and such lands are designated as certified areas. (b) The following shellfish laads in Suffolk County are in such sanitary condition'that shellfish thereon shall not be taken for use as food, and such lands are designated as uncertified areas. Town of Brookhaven (South Shore) Great South Bay 1. All 'rivers, creeks, canals and boat basins between Nicoll Point aid EHoells Point. 2. All that area lying 500 feet easterly and westerly of the bulkheads forming the entrance to the harbor serving Fire Island Pines and extending 1,000 feet northtrly of the entrance to said harbor. 3. All that area adjacent to Sailors Raven lying within an area extending one thousand feet northerly of the entrance to the boat basin at Sailors Haven and extending five hundred feet easterly and westerly of the entrance to said boat basin, during the period May 15 to September 30, both inclisive. 4. �All that area adjacent to Barrett Yeach lying within an area extending one thousand feet northerly of the entrance to the boat basin at Barrett Beach and extending five hundred feet easterly and westerly of the entrance to said boat basin, during the period May 15 co September 30, both inclusive. 5. All that area adjacent to Davis Park lying within an area extending one thousand feet northerly of the entrance to the harbor serving Davis Park and extending five hundred feet easterly and westerly of the entrance to said harbor, h&ring the period May 15 to September 30, both inclusive. 6. All that area adjacent to Watch Hill lying within an area extending one thousand feet northerly of the entrance to the harbor serving watch Hill and extending five hundred feet easterly and westerly of the entrance to said harbor during the period May 15 to September 30, both inclusive. Note: All reference points in the Tvwn of Brookhaven (Great South Bay) taken from N.O.A.A. Nautical chart 712352 dated December 1975, YvcpPr ma+ L,-ncted as "Re.al lOtRlDsrk" or "local ume." F-3 TC-N OF BEOKHA~VEE PAGE 2 of 3 Patchogue Bay - 1. All that area lying north of a line extending easterly from the scuthwesternmost extremity of the Brookhaven Town Dock located at the foot of Blue Point Avenue in Blue Point (local landmark), to Buoy N"4" in the channel leading from Patchogue River, thence continuing easterly to Buoy Fl G"1" located at the entrance to Abets Creek and thence continuing northeasterly to the southernmost extremity of land.forming the eastern- side of the entrance to Abets Creek. Note: In the eventBuoy N"4" and/or Buoy FL G"I", referenced above, are moved from their established locations per U.S.C. & G.S. Nautical Chart #120-SC, dated December 1971, that area no;:th :. of a line extending easterly from the southwesternmost '. :extremity of the Brookhaven Town Dock located at the foot of Blue Point Avenue in Blue Point (local landmark), to the southernmost extremity of land forming the eastern side of the entrance to Abets Creek, shall remain closed to the taking of shellfish until said Buoy N"4" and/or Buoy Fl G"I" shall be permanently relocated on their designated stations by the - United States Coast Guard. Bellport Bay 1. All that area, including tributaries, north of a line extending .outh- easterly from the flagstai f of the Bellport Yacht Club (local landmark), located at the foot of Bellport Lame in Bellport, to Buoy Fl G"S', located in the main east-west channel southerly of Fireplace Neck, and thence northeasterly 4o the peak of the'gable of the building known as the "Manor of St. George Museutm" (local landmark), located on the eastern shore of B.llport Bay south of Sandy Point at Shirley. Note: In the event Buoy 1l G"5" is moved from its established location per U.S.C. & G.S. Nautical Chart #120-SC dated December 1971, that area'north of a line extending southeasterly from tae flagstaff of the Ballport Yacht Club (local landmark) lorcated at the foot of Beli port Lane in Bellport to Smith Point shall remain closed to the taking of shellfish until said Buoy FI G"5" shall be permanently relocated on its designated station by the United Statecs Coast Guard. Narrow Bay - 1. Shirley Basin (local landmark) located west of the Smith Point Bridge at the foot of the William Floyd Parkway. 2. All that area, including creeks, canals, rivers and coves of the mainland shore, north of a line extending easterly from the shore at the northern end of the Smith Point Bridge to the bulkhead at the foot of Cranberry Drive. 3. All that area, including Pattersquash Creek and Mastic Beach Lagoon (local name), at Mastic Beach north of a line extending northeasterly from the southern tip of the first point of land east of the foot of Cranberry Drive to the bulkhead at tne foot of Jefferson Drive and continuing northeasterly to the southern tip of the point of land at the foot of Washington Drive. 4. All coves, creeks, and canals between Pattersquash Creek and Home Creek (local name). Moriches Bay 1. All that area including all creeks, canals, rivers and coves north of a line extending easterly from Forge Point and running magnetic east to Buoy C"25", thence running ncrtheasterly to Buoy Fl G"27", thence running easterly to Buoy C"29'", thence running southeasterly to Buoy X"4",. thence running southerly to the northeasternmost point of lend located on the west size of Moriches Inlet, thence continuing northeasterly to Buoy N"41" (located within waters of the Town of Southampton). Atlantic Ocean 1. All areas of the Atlantic Ocean in tie Town of Brookhaven are certified for the taking of shellfish. F-4 -ICVH (2F BS3CjiL;XEi WAGE 3 of 3 Note: All reference points in the Town of Brookhavan (South Shore) takan from U.S.C. & G.S. Nautical Chart #120-SC dated December 1971, except as indicated as "local landmark" or "local name". Town of Brookhaven (North Shore) Port Jefferson Harbor 1. All that area south and east of a line extending southwesterly from the flashing light and bell on the jetty on the eastern side of the entrance to Port Jefferson Harbor to the flashing red light on the jetty on the western side of the harbor entrance and then continuing southerly to a stone jetty at the shore near Buoy C"3" at the antrance to Setauket Harbor. Note: All reference points in the Town of Brookhaven (North Shore) taken from U.S.C. & G.S. Nautical Chart #361 dated December 7. 1968 Peter A. A. Berle Commissioner By: Robert B. Mac Millan Supervisor Marine Environmental Control Dated: Albany, New York July 16, 1976 STATE LAIJ PROHIBITS THE TAKING OF SEELLFISH FROM THE UNCEPKIFIED AREAS OF THE SHELLFISI{ LANDS AND WATERS OF TFE STATE. If you intend to harvest shellfish from the waters of any town other than that in which you claim residency, then contact the offices at N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation at Stony Brook and-obtain listings of the uncertified areas in that town. F-5 TrTN OF EAST HAMPTON PAGE I OF 2 NEW YORWK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON.1PNT.AL CONSERVATION EXVITO0N.i2NTAL COCTROL UNIT STONY BOCOK, N.Y. 11794 NOTICE TO ALL S1ELLFISH RHAPVESTES NOTICE CF CONDITION OF ALL SHELLFISH GROUNDS LOCATED WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF EAST HAU/FTON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, STATE OF NEN YORK. Excerpted from Part 41 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York. Thd folloying is a statement of sanitary condition of. shellfish lands in New 'fork State. Notice of changes in classification will be sent to bay-men by mail as and when they may occur. Whenever used in this Part 41: (a) the term "mile" refers to statute mile; (b) the term "monument" refers to a permanent post or marker placed on or near the shore by the Znvironmental Ccnservation Ddpartment to serve as a landmark in establishing the lines of closure. Section 41.3 Shellfish Lands in Suffolk County (a) The shellfish lands in Suffolk County, except those listed in subdivision (b) are in such sanitary condition that shellfish thereon may be taken for u.,e as food, and such lands are designated as certified areas; (b) The following shellfish lands in Suffolk County are in such sanitary condition that shellfish thereon shall not be taken for use as food, and such lands are designated as uncertified areas. Town of East Hampton Sag Harbor 1. All that area, including tributaries, lying westerly of a line extending northerly along the breakwater located at the entrance to Sag Harbor (local landmark) and thence continuing northerly from the northern .and of the breakwater to the northeasterrmast extremity of the timber builk- head protecting the shoreline adjacent to East Harbor Drive, North /aven (local landmark); and east of a line extending south (magneticjfrom the wooden staircase located at the southern end of Cliff Drive, Sag Harbor, to the staircase on the opposite shoreline (local landmarks). Note: All reference points in Sag Rarbor in the Town of East Hampton taken from N.O.AA. Nautical Chart 7'12358 (formerly U.S.C. & G.S. #363) dated August 17, 1974, except as indicated as "local land- mark". Montauk Lake (Montauk Harhor) 1. All that area lying south of a line extending easterly from the flashing red light on the jetty on the western side of the entrance to Montauk Harbor (Lake Montauk) to the flashing green light on the jetty on the eastern side of the entrance to the harbor; and north of the causeway to Star Island and a line extending easterly from the flag tower at the U.S. Coast Guard Station on Star IsLmnd to the southern extremity of the gas and oil dock serving the Lake Montauk Marina (local landmark) on the eastern shore of Montauk Harbor (Make MIontauk). Note: All reference points in Miontark Lake (Montauk Harbor) in the Town of East Hampton taken from N.O~.A.. Nautical Chart #13205 (form- erly U.S.C. & G.S. #1211) daitd November 23, 1974, except as in- dicated as "local landmark". %Peter A. A. Pete As amended Commissioner January l175 !.;rtWhr P. !-d M.illan Datedt Albany, N.Y. F-6 S i r of june 3.., 19'.:- e t al C-ctrol TaJW1 OF ZAST RAM~PTO!Nl PAGE 2OF2 STA'TE LAU i-10HIHITS THE TAKIN~G OF SI=LFISH FROH! THE UNCF-2TIFIED fLREAS OF THE SEELLFISH LAZNTS AND WATERS OF THE STATE. If you intend to harvest shellfish from th-- waters of any town other than that in which you claimm residency, then contact the offices at 11,Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation at Stony Brook and obtain listings of the uncertified areas in that town.~- F-7 * -. .' - ~~~~TOWN OF UENPSTZ&D VW YOR , STATE DEPA2IIZT OF ENVIRCMNTrAL CONSE5LVATION. - RMION I, EWVIRONENTAL CONTROL UNIT STONY BVOOK, N.Y. .117S * -NOTICE TO ALT, SHELLFISH THARVESTERS NOTICE OF CONDITION OF ALL SEMLF1SR GROUNDS LOCATED WIflI OR ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF M-UTSTEAD, NASSAU COUNTY, STATE OF NQ1 YOUK. Excerpted from Part 41 of the Offic'ial Compilation of Codes, Rules and Pe- gulations. of the State of New York. The following is a statement of sanattary condition of shellfish. lands in New York State. Notice of changes -.n classification will be sent to baymen, by mail as and when they may-occur. -Whenever used in this Part 41: (a) the term "mile" refers to statute mile; -, (1, the term "monument" ref ers to a permanent post or marker placed an or near the shore by the N.Y.S. -Environmental Conservation Department to perve, as a landmark- in establishing the lines of closure. Section 41.2 Shellfish Lands in Nassau County (a) The shellfish lands in Nassau County, except those listed in sub- division (b) are in such sanitary C~ondition that shellfish thereon may be taken for 3ase as food,'and such lands are therefore designated Zs certified areas. (b) The following shellfish lauds in Nassau County are in such sanitary condition that shellfish thereon sh-all not be taken for use as food and s~ich lands are therefore designated as itneertified areas. Town of Hempstead Jamaica.Bay *- 1. All of the headwaters of. .Iamaica lay and its tributaries lying 'within the Town of Hempstead. 'Hempstead Bay 1. All that area lying west of the Jnmes Beach Causeway portion of the Wantagh State Parkwiay which include all waters within Henpstead Bay. Atlantic Ocean 'L. All that area of the Atlantic Ocean= lying west of a line extending southeasterly from GONG R"4",. locszed at the entrance to East Rockaway Inlet, through. Buny R"4"MHISTLE, located at the south- western corner of the Fish Haven.. 2. All that area in the Atlantic Ocesri lying within a one-half nautical mile distance of any portion of the Ocean portion of the sewer out- fall line serving the Wantagh. Water Pollution Control Plant. South Oyster Bay 1. All that area lying east of the zams Beach Causeway portion of the Wantagh State Parkway and west of a magnetic north-south line orig- inating at the southernmost tip of the bulkhoad at the western side of the unnamed canal at Fort Neck Iihadow (property occupied by- the Harbour Green Shore Club) and extmiding to the barrier beach. TO%-1b OF HDeSTF.AD PAG E2 OF 2 South Oyster Bay, (Cont.) . 2. All of Jonas Creek and all other creeks and canal a between Fort Neck Meadov and Unqua Point, including that area lying north of a line extending easterly from the southeasternmost tip of the bulk- ]lead at the western side of the unnam~ed 'canal at Fort Neck Meadow ( property occupied by the Hiarbour Green Shore Club) , to the south- ernmost tip .of the bulkhead at Unqua Point. 3. All that area, including adjacent creeks and canals, north of a tlne extending easterly from the southernmost tip of the bulkhead at 'Unqua Point to the southeastern end of the yacht club dock at the Unqua-Corinthiarx Yacht Club (local landmark). Note: All reference points in the Town of Hempstead taken frord U.S.C. & G.S. Nautical Charts i'1lZ-SC dated December 1970 and #121:5 dated July la, 1970, except as indicated. as "local lardmarkt1. .02dan Reid Commissioner By: Robert B. Mae.Millan Supervisor of Marine Environmental Control. Dated: Albany, N.Y. April 8, 1969 As Amended thru 0 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~July 1. 1974 Dated: January 1, l'~h STATZ LAW PRCHIBITS THE TkKT2TG OF S3iELLFISH FROM THE 0mU1'CE'FIEJ) AREAS OF TEE SHELLFISH LANDS AND WATE1"S OF THE 8'-ATE., If you intend to harvest shellf ish from the waters of any townm other than that in which you claim residency, then contac-t the off ices at X.Y.S. Depart- ment of Environmental Conservation at Stony Brook and obtain listings of the uncert~ified areas of that town. F-9 TO iNF TfILMTOM OAF 0 2 UEU7 YOMK STATE DEPAPME".T OF MM.M'F~k=,AL CONSERVATION LUGICm I, ENVT1 mM'Iz"A C&-TmO mufl STC11 UrCOI~, N. y. 11794I Yr-TyCE TO) P.'U SH23 MSTEVS NOTICE OF COINDITIOIT GM ALL SEZ~TIISF GROMIilS !.O'UED WITHIN OR ADJACIMT TO M~E TU~N OF m IN71Gr:N,.SUFrTLK CCULTY TAT OF NIW YORK. Excerpted from ParL 41 of the Of,'krial Compilation of Codes, rules and Regulaticns -of the State of Naew Yorl.. The f ollr.wing La a statement of sanitary condition of thellf ioh leads in New York Scate. Not-Ize of charges in clossiftcation "7ill be sent to bayran by mail as and when they may occ=. Whenever used In this Part 41: (a) the term '"mile"l refers te. Statute mile; (b) the term "monument" refers ta, a Twormanent poat or marker placcd on or near the shcre by tba:.N.Y.S, Environmental Cornservation Department to sez-ve as a landmark in establishing the lines of ClO.9ura. Section 41.3 Shellfish Lauds in- Snffolk Cz~ty. (a) Thae shellfishb lauds in Svr~folk Camty, ercept those listed in subdivision (b) are in ercli saniteay coadiUon that shellfish thereca may be taksn for use as Ewd, and such lands are de- sianated ao certUfied arc~ac. * (bi ~~~~The following shellfish '-.ands it, Mffolk County'are in eu.ch saaitary condition that selllisil therson shall not be takten fo L e as food, and eu,.h lands a.- designated as uncertiflied Towin of Funtington vortflport Harbor 1. 'All that area, including tribnitar-ig, south and east ef a line extending south-westarly from the td3 of the dock serving the large white house !casted at 27 3ld Point Road, Nort'npcrt, and owned in November, 1972 by 11, I-Ichardsoa (local landmark) , to the northernmost side of tha btiifdiug knvwn as the Vauderbilt Plane H1anaer, lodated on the opposite shore (local landmark) . Centerport Harbor 1. All that area, including tributarin~, a~n outh of a lIne extending in an eazterly dircction Zrom the dock serving the Huntington Beach Association Re r-Aimant Stand (local landmark) , located at the foot of Ad&.'s Strew, Uuntington Beach, to the western tip of the sand opit furmtz~, the entrance to Canterport Harbor. Huntt.ngton Harbor 1. All that area including tributarier,, lying south and asst of a line e-ytending northeasterly from ITLility Pole N~o. "LIL 55", located at the foot of Wendover Die on West Shore- Road, to the staircase l~ocated an the point of land on the opposite shore (ownrez by Thomas A. Krnutson and for~erly known as Elbertson's Point-). 10~~. TOWN OF HUNTfllGTON VAGE 2 OF 2 Cold Spring Harbor 1. All that area, ircludirg tributaries, south and east of a line extending southnrly from: the t4' of the dock serving the Cold Spring Ea-bor Beach Club (Iccal laudork) to the westcrn ex- trammity of the whitze hcuse Iccnted oa the shoreline inediately west of Cold Spring Baach (local landr-ark). Note: All reference poirts in the Tw-,s of Huntirgton taken from U.S. Department rf Conz~erce, National Oceanic and Attozpherir' eAdministratlon, National Ocean Surve7, Nautical Chort #224 dated August 26, 1972 ecxept those indicated as "local landmark". - 1 oe~gdcn Reid Commiss~onc-r - Robert B. Mec Fillan s perviaor Marine Environmental Contrcl Dated: Albany, N.Y. April 8, 1969 As amended thru Dated: January I, L'7- June 4, 1973 Az zaisndad-: Jauuar -L755 STATE tAW PROHIBITS TX: TAKIXi OF iRELLFISH FROtX THE UNCEXCIFIED ARHAS (UT TRE SHMLFiSl LltZUDS AND WATERS OF -,FE STATE. If you intend to harvest shellfish from the waters of any tcun other than that in which you claim residency, contact N nY.S Environrental Con- servation Department and obtain listings of the uncertified areas in that town. F-li TOWN OF ISLIP _ - : * - - g . ___ PAG_- -Fa2_ STONY BROOK, N. Y. 1174 - - ' NOTICE TO ALL SHELLFISlr HATV-STERS NOTICE OF CCEDITION OF ALL SHELLFISH GhCUNDS LOCATED WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO TEE TONT OF ISLIP, SUFFOLK COLUTr, STATE OF NE_. YOrK. Excerpted from Part 41 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York. The following is a statement of sani:ary condition of shellfish lands in New York State. Notice of changes i'l classification will be sent to bay- men by mail as and when they nay occur. W!henever used in this Part 41: (a) the tera 'mile" refers to statute nile; (b) the term 'monument" refers to a permanent post or marker placed on or near the shore by the N.Y.S. Department of Envirormental Conservation to serve as a landmark in establishing the lines of closure. Section 41.3 Shellfish Lands in Suffolk County (a) The shellfish lands in Suffolk County, except those listed in 'sub-division (b) are- in such sanitary condition that.shellfish therein may be taken for use as food, and such lands are designated as certified areas. (b) The following shellfish lands in Suffolk County are in such sanitary condition that shellfish thereon shall not be taken for use as food, and such lands are designated as uncertified areas. Town of Islip Great South Bay 1. All that area, including adjacent creeks, rivers and canals, lying north of a line extending southeasterly from the southern tip of the bulkhead extending from shore at the foot of Western Concourse at Copiague (local landmark) to a buoy located on the northern edge of the east-west boat channel south of the entrance to Howell Creek, thence continuing easterly along the northern edge of the east-west boat channel, as defined by a series of buoys regularly spaced, to a buoy marking the intersection of said east-West channel with Oak Island Channel, thence continuing easterly along a line as defined by a series of buoys to the __ _---s-outhwestern corner of the large concrete base at the northern end of the Robert iooses Cause.ay Bridge located at Conklin Point. Said buoys are of a can type, white and orange in color and have lettered 'thereon, "N.Y.S. ENV. CONSV_ DZPT., SHELLFISH CLOSURE LINE." 2. All creeks and canals between Conklin Point and the southwestern tip of'the'bulkhead at the Bay Wlay Cabana and Tennis Club, located- at the foot of Girard Avenue in Brightwaters. 3. All that area of Great Cove (Islip Cove), and all adjacent creeks, rivers and canals lying north of a line extending easterly from the southwestern tip of the bulkhead at the Bay !Jay Cabana and Tennis Club,,located at the foot of Girard Avenue in Brightwacers, as defined by a series of buoys regularly spaced, to the south- western tip of the bulkhead at the Islip Town Beach, located at the foot of South Bay Avenue at Bayberry Point. Said buoys are of a can type, white and orage in color and have lettered thereon, "N.Y.S. EZV. CONS. 0DPT., SIELLFISH CLOCUPE LINE." 4. All of Champlin Creel: and adjacent creeks and canals, north of a line extending easterly from the southwestern tip of the bulkhead at the Islip Town Beach, located at the foot of South Bay Avenue at Bayberry Point, along a series of buoys to the southern extremity of the beach house serving Collins memorial Beach (Town of Islip), located at thefoot of Bayview Avenue at East Islip. Said buoys are of a can type; white and orange in color and have lettered--thereon, -.Y.S. EbrF-. COUSV,. DEPT., SHELLFISH CLOSURE LINE." F-12