[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
Attachment #95.5.6.3 TD 224 .N46 P65 1996 A La v POLLUTANT LOADING OF URBAN AND RURAL AREAS IN SOUTHEASTERN NEW HAMPSHIRE FINAL REPORT Submitted by: Cl< Larry K. Brannaka University of New Hampshire Environmental Research Group Durham, NH August 1, 1996 NO Nil This report was funded in part by a grant from the Office of State Planning, New Hampshire Coastal Program, as authorized by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ak- Administration (NOAA), Grant Award Number NA570ZO320. Nil Pollutant Loading of Urban and Rural Areas in Southeastern New Hampshire Abstract This study was a pilot study of the highway maintenance practices of four New Hampshire communities and the loading rates of the non-point source pollutants. The communities selected included one urban community and four surrounding rural communities. The study was performed with a survey form and follow-up interviews. The objectives were to evaluate if there are significant differences between the practices and the loading rates of urban and rural communities. A second objective was to estimate the loading rates of various non-point source pollutants. The only potential pollutants found attributable to highway maintenance practices where sand and salt. Rural loading rates were estimated between 33 to 50 yd 3/Mi for sand and 4.2 to 12 yd 3/Mi for salt. The sand loading rates for the urban areas was significantly lower, with 7.5 yd3/mi. The salt loading rate was within the same range as the rural communities surveyed. The general roadway maintenance procedures were very similar between each community surveyed. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Overall Concept I 11. Present Scope of Work 2 111. Methodology 3 IV. Results 7 V. Salt and Sand Loading 15 VI. Conclusions and Recommendations 17 APPENDIX A. Survey of Road Maintenance Practices APPENDIX B. Interview Questionnaire for Survey of Road Maintenance Practices APPENDIX C. Survey of Road Maintenance Practices Summary of Responses APPENDIX D. Dover Salt and Plow Routes, and Structures Requiring Maintenance List of Ficiures: Figure 1. Selected Town Locations. Figure 2. Town of Dover Road Map. Figure 3. Town of Barrington Road Map. Figure 4. Town of Rollinsford Road Map. Figure 5. Town of Farmington Road Map. Figure 6. Barrington Snow Plow Routes, Bridges, and Major Culverts Figure 7. Barrington Priority Snow Plow Routes and Problem Areas Figure 8. Rollinsford Plow Routes Figure 9. Farmington Downtown Area Figure 10. DoverTraffic Volumes Figure 11. DoverPriority 1 and2Salt Routes Pollutant Loading Mapping of Urban and Rural Areas in Southeastern New Hampshire 6 Final Report The research detailed in this report is the first step or phase in a project conceived to identify those areas in the coastal region of New Hampshire which are the most sensitive to various types of non-point source pollution. The project is directed toward municipal maintenance programs; looking at non-point source pollutants distributed along the municipal highway systems as part of the standard maintenance practices. The first phase of this project was to identify the kinds of non-point source pollutants distributed, and to quantify the loading to the environment on an areal basis. The project did not deal with pollutants resulting from roadway traffic. 1. Overall Concept The ultimate objective of the overall project is to identify the areas in the coastal region of New Hampshire which are the most sensitive to non-point source pollution from various selected pollutants. Once identified, those sensitive areas can be compared to pollutant loading information to create visual maps identifying the loading in sensitive areas. The maps and study results would be useful as a tool in prioritizing and identifying the most appropriate remedial measures for a particular pollutant. The end result will be the most effective use of the municipalities' remedial dollars. The first phase of the project was to develop a pollutant loading data base based on surveys sent out to local municipalities and interviews with local township maintenance departments. The data base may serve as the basis for creating loading maps generated by hand or by combining the survey data with a geographical information system (GIS) data base. This first phase was funded by in part by a grant from the Office of State Planning, New Hampshire Coastal Program, as authorized by the National Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 2 Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Grant Award Number NA570ZO320. The findings of this first phase are described in the body of this report. The second phase of the overall project would be to utilize a computer model, such as DRASTIC, to interface with a GIS data base to identify areas of highest pollution sensitivity or risk. DRASTIC formulates this information using the GIS data for each location in the data base and establishing a weighted value for the pollution risk for that location. This weighted value may include parameters such as land use, soil type, vegetative cover, depth to groundwater, hydraulic conductivity, surface slope, proximity to surface waters, etc. Weights for the each parameter are established with respect to the individual pollutant characteristics and the sensitivity of the parameter to that pollutant. The final risk is the summation of the product of the relative risk that the parameter contributes to the pollution potential, and the degree of the risk held by that particular location for each parameter. The model will compile these risk values for all locations in the selected area. The ultimate product is a detailed map identifying the degrees of risk based on a pre- selected scale of risk values. This map will identify the areas most sensitive to particular pollutants. The model may be reformulated for different pollutants. The third phase of the project is to overlay the maps from the first two phases and identify the locations at which there may be a need for corrective action. Those locations at which remedial measures may decrease NPS pollution will be identified as well as the nature of the remedial measures required. This information in addition to the relative risk from the maps will aid in prioritizing the remedial projects. 11. Present Scope of Work The scope of work for this report is a pilot study of the first phase, or the pollutant loading mapping. The pollutant mapping was based on information collected from four local municipalities, on activities which may either directly or indirectly contribute to non- point source pollution. These activities include salting and sanding the roads; street sweeping; use of dust palliatives; agri-chemicals; maintenance of bridges and runoff control structures; and construction best management practices (131-113s). Information on these activities were gathered through surveys sent directly to the municipalities and their maintenance departments, as well as lollulanl loaling Mapping Final Report 0-6 3 personal interviews with the persons in charge of operations that may affect non-point source pollution. The specific tasks performed as part of this study included: A. Selection of study area, B. Designing a survey, C. Formulating an interview procedure, D. Sending out surveys, E. Setting up and conducting interviews to supplement survey information, F. Compiling the information gathered in a data base, G. Preparation of final summary report. The information gathered was evaluated with respect to its value in identifying loading rates, and areal distribution of the pollutant loading. The procedures used in gathering the information were also evaluated with respect to future efforts in pollutant load mapping. and aid in the evaluation of immediate remedial needs. Lastly, this study evaluated the benefits of the gathered information, especially in light of the cost and effort required to obtain it. 111. Methodology The methodology used in this study is described below Reference is made to the specific tasks outlined in the introduction. A. Selection of Study Area: The first task of this project was to select pilot study area. The objective was to examine at least two communities of different demographics, to see if there was a difference in the type of information which could be obtained. An urban community and a rural community in the same general area were desired. The pilot study area was selected in a meeting between the NHOSP, NHDES, UNH Technology Transfer Center, and the author. Dover, NH was selected as the urban area, since the information gathered in this study could potentially contribute to other on-going studies in that municipality. Three surrounding rural towns were selected because they were either adjacent to the town of Dover, or in the general area. The towns selected were Barrington, Rollinsford, and Farmington. Barrington and Rollinsford Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 0 A-: 4 are adjacent to Dover. Barrington is inland, while Rollinsford borders the Salmon Falls River which flows between New Hampshire and Maine. The locations of the selected towns are shown in Figure 1. Studying towns in the same vicinity reduced the influence of climate variables due to geographic location. The layout of the roads are shown in Figures 2 through 5 for Dover, Barrington, Rollinsford, and Farmington, respectively. The study concentrated only on those roads maintained by the municipalities, and ignored those practices along State or Federal Highways, such as the Spaulding Turnpike and Route 9 in Figure 2. B. Designing a Survey: The first part of this task was to identify the type of information which would be useful in establishing pollutant loading rates, and the distribution of those rates along different sections of roadway. This task was initiated by examining other studies which have been done for highway maintenance practices. We obtained a report by the Office of the Legislative Auditor of the State of Minnesota of a review of the best practices for snow and ice control (Office of the Legislative Auditor ,1995). This document described the results of a detailed survey sent out to each municipality in the State of Minnesota requesting information on the current procedures and equipment used for snow and ice control and removal. The report was intended to provide a media for the exchange of information between municipalities in the state. Included in the report was the survey they sent out to the municipalities, and a tabulation of the results. We utilized this survey as the starting point for our own survey. We first selected those questions pertaining to the spreading of sand, salt, and any pre-wetting agents on the roads. The Minnesota survey was too detailed in many aspects of the snow plowing procedures for our own objectives, so many questions were either eliminated, combined, or simplified. The Minnesota survey only addressed snow removal and traction control for icy conditions, and did not include questions on the other maintenance practices in which we were interested. We consequently added questions to the adapted Minnesota survey to solicit the type information which we were seeking on the other practices mentioned above. The draft of the survey was reviewed first by Mr. David Fluharty of the University of New Hampshire T' Center, and then by Marcia A. Brown-Thunberg and Jennifer Fox of the Office of State Planning of New Hampshire (NHOSP). Their comments were incorporated into the final survey. A copy of the final survey form is included in Appendix A. Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report a A- 5 The survey form was broken down into seven categories. They included: 1. Snow Removal and Traction Management, 11. Soil Stabilizers, 111. Bridge Maintenance Practices, I V. Street Sweeping and Debris Removal, V. Catch/Sediment Basin and Culvert Maintenance, V 1. Pesticide, Herbicide, and Fertilizer Application; VII. Construction Practices. Each category included questions on a particular type of non-point source pollutant. The potential pollutants addressed by each of the respective categories are: 1. Sand and salt; 11. Dust palliatives such as waste oil or liquid calcium chloride; 111. Bridge paint scale, rust, and sand blasting sand; IV. Sand, dust and dirt, roadway residues from vehicles, and litter; V. Sand, dirt, and organic material; VI. Agri-chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, and nutrients from fertilizers; V1. Sand, dirt, organic matter, roadway residues, construction equipment residues, and other erosion materials. The contaminants can be transported by means of surface water runoff, or through infiltration into the vadose zone and eventually to the groundwater table. Some the pollutants listed, such as sand, dirt, and organic matter are responsible for adding to the sediment load of surface waters, making waters more turbid and less suited to aquatic life. Road residues may contain petroleum based contaminants and heavy metals. Excess nutrients from fertilizers accelerate vegetative and alga growth in surface waters, and can make groundwaters unsuited for human consumption. Pesticides and herbicides can be transported to surface waters or groundwaters if the use is excessive, and can reach harmful concentrations for both aquatic life and human consumption. Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 6 C. Formulating an interview procedure: The draft survey was reviewed for questions which were best asked during an interview. Those questions were removed from the survey, and incorporated into an outline for the interview. This outline is shown in Appendix B. The interview procedure as outlined above was altered slightly. It was decided since the final survey was so detailed, that it would be better to hold the interviews after the municipalities had time to review the survey and gather the information together, but before they returned the completed survey forms. The wisdom of this procedure was demonstrated by the fact that only one municipality had taken the time to fill out the survey form by the time of the interview. The interview procedure used was to go over the survey form questions, and incorporate the questions from the outline for the interview. This procedure worked well, with the interviewer filling out the survey form and making supplemental notes as the survey proceeded. D. Sending out surveys: Before surveys were sent out, contact was made with the road agent or public works director of each of the four municipalities. The contacts were: Dover: Mr. Michael Bobinsky, Public Works Director. River Street Dover, NH 03820 (603) 743-6070 Barrington: Mr. Ronald Landry, Road Agent. 99 Brooks Road Barrington, NH 03825 (603) 664-5379 Rollinsford: Mr. Ronald Carignan 477 Silver Street Rollinsford, NH 03869 (603) 742-0831 Farmington: Mr. Clark Hackett Town Office Farmington, NH 03835 (603) 755-4884 The purpose of our study was explained to each of the contacts above. The extent of the information sought was explained. In each case, a commitment to participate was obtained. For Dover, an initial interview was held with Mr. Bobinsky in which he agreed to Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 0 k.; - 7 participate and outlined his department's procedures. Dover was the only municipality surveyed that had a written snow removal operational plan. Mr. Bobinsky provided a copy of the plan for our review. The survey was sent out shortly after the last contact was made. E. Conducting the interviews: The interviews were conducted in person with all but Mr. Clark Hackett of Farmington. Due to conflicts with his work schedule, Mr. Hackett was interviewed by phone. The interviews were performed in May and early June. Supplemental material was provided by Mr. Bobinsky of Dover, regarding material usage and roadway management. F. Compile Information in a Database: The information gathered in the surveys and interviews has been compiled on a single survey document, and is being entered into a data base. The data base being used is Microsoft'D Visual Fox-Pro. The summary survey document is included in Appendix C. Comparisons were made between the urban and rural areas and are presented below. Data on the material usage, number of operations, priority routes, and the relative frequency of sanding were analyzed to estimate the loading rates of sand and salt to specific roads in the municipalities. Loading maps were prepared where appropriate, to indicate the areal extent of different calculated loading rates. IV. Results The four municipalities surveyed provided a cross-section of rural communities with populations from 2,600 (Rollinsford) to 6,700 (Barrington) and an urban population of 26,800. With reference to total land area, Barrington has the largest area, with approximately 49 Mi.2, followed by Farmington (37.4 Mi.2 ), Dover (24 mi.2), and Rollinsford (7.5 mi.2). Although it has only the third largest area, Dover has the most highway miles, with 125 miles of paved two-lane roads, 20 miles of unpaved roads, and 26.5 miles of State and Federal highways. Farmington has 66 miles of two lane paved town maintained roads, 22 miles of unpaved roads, and 15 miles of State highways. Barrington has 52 miles of paved two-lane roads, and 10 miles of gravel roads. Rollinsford, being the smallest town, has only 15 miles of Class V (rural, town maintained) roads. A. Summary of maintenance procedures. Both Dover and Barrington have 27 cul-de-sacs and dead-ends. Farmington and "I'll A_j 8 Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report W Rollinsford both have 16. These features are difficult to plow and sand with the same equipment used on the highways. In the case of each town, these features are plowed and sanded using a smaller, pick-up truck. Dover has 10 bridges 10 feet or more in length, Barrington has 5, Rollinsford has 2 although one is owned by the railroad, and Farmington has 11. Bridges can be direct avenues for salt and sand and other sediments to enter surface waters. All the municipalities rely on state inspections of the bridges to evaluate their safety and rehabilitation requirements. In the rural communities, this inspection is done on a 2 year cycle, in Dover the bridges are inspected on an annual basis. Most of the Road Agents perform a periodic inspection of their own, but not on a regular basis. There is no repainting program in any of the communities surveyed, although Barrington reported having repainted one of their bridges in 1986. The only debris from the repainting operation was what was scraped off the bridge members using wire brushes and manual scrapers. The debris was not captured. Sand and salt are spread on the bridges as the roads are sanded and salted. In the spring, the grit on the bridges is removed as part of the street sweeping in Dover and Barrington. Dover's street sweeping contains the grit, and stockpiles it behind the River Street facility. Barrington uses a side sweeper, which pushes the grit off the roadway, or in this case, off the bridges. In Rollinsford, the grit falls through the bridge deck, and into the water below. Farmington washes the bridge decks in the spring, using river water. The grit is transported off the bridge and is carried with the runoff. Dover has the most catch basins, with 2050. Farmington has approximately 200, whereas Barrington and Rollinsford have only ditches. The curbs in Dover are 80% granite barrier or sloped type, and the rest are bituminous. In Rollinsford, the curbs are 50% granite, and 50% bituminous. Farmington has only 1.5-2 miles of granite curbing. In all three towns, there are only grate-type storm drain inlets. The drain inlets are inspected annually in Rollinsford and Farmington, and on an as-needed basis in Dover and Barrington. Dover has a program worked out where they clean about 500 inlets/yr. Rollinsford cleans about 10/yr. Farmington cleans those needing attention in September, whereas Barrington cleans inlets to culverts on an as-needed basis. The material collected during cleaning in Dover is stockpiled behind the Public Works Garage on River Street and is mixed with Pollulan, Loading Mapping Final Report 9 brush for fill. Rollinsford and Farmington both collect the material at the transfer station and landfill, respectively. The material collected from the culvert inlets and outlets in Barrington is left along the shoulder of the roads, or given to local residents in the area who have requested fill material. In each community, at least 90% of the storm drains discharge to surface water. Keeping inlets clean reduces the potential sediment load to the streams. The number of sediment retention basins in Barrington is 5, and in Rollinsford is 35. Farmington has hone. A list of 59 basins in Dover is provided in Appendix D. The basins are all inspected annually in the rural towns, and on an complaint basis in Dover. Rollinsford cleans approximately 10/yr, and Barrington cleans their basins on an as-needed basis. The basins in Dover are cleaned on approximately a five year cycle. Debris is taken behind the Public Works Garage in Dover and mixed with brush for fill. In Rollinsford debris is taken to the transfer station and stockpiled for future fill. In Barrington, it is deposited in the area of the basin, or given to area residents. Culverts in the town of Farmington typically have a rock lined sediment trap at their outfalls, which is cleaned on a four- year cycle. Sediment is disposed of at the site of the outfalls. In Barrington there is no formal sediment trap structure at the culverts, but the outfalls are dug out as needed. Sediment is disposed of on site. In Dover, the only sediment traps are located on private property, typically at parking lots to trap oil and grease before the runoff is discharged into the storm drain system. Vegetated waterways exist throughout the downtown area of Dover adjacent to the Cocheco River. In Rollinsford, there are vegetated waterways at Sligo gully, Old Mill Lane, the Transfer Station, and Woods Road. Farmington has four vegetated waterways. Each town inspects the waterways at least annually. Those in Rollinsford are also mowed once a year. Sediment accumulated in these waterways in Dover and Farmington are collected at the respective landfills. Ditches are treated similarly. In each town ditches are kept open by excavation or regrading. In all but Farmington, this is done on an as-needed/complaint basis. In Farmington, it is done two to three times a year during the summer. In Barrington road grading on gravel roads is done annually, and backhoes work the ditches on a 5 year cycle. The debris is taken to the respective landfills, except in Barrington, where it is usually given to a list of people in the area Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 10 requesting fill. BIVIPs are not typi cally used during these operations. Dover and Barrington sometimes will reseed ditches if vegetation is removed. Rollinsford does not. Farmington does not typically remove vegetation when cleaning: ditches. Erosion from damaged vegetated areas adjacent to the roadways is kept in check through reseeding in three of the four surveyed towns, with Rollinsford as the exception. In Farmington, hydroseeding is used, which seeds and mulches in one operation. This is typically done by a contractor. No town applies fertilizer to roadside areas. In addition, Dover has instituted a program known as "Adopt a spot", where residents or local groups can assume the responsibility of maintaining an area of vegetated public land, such as parks, traffic squares, and medians. The residents receive recognition for their efforts through a posted sign at the location. In this way , the town is receiving active participation from its residents for approximately 12-14 areas, thereby relieving the town maintenance department is relieved of caring for In municipal construction areas, Dover, Barrington, and Farmington typically use some sort of best management practice to control erosion. In Rollinsford, most contractor construction projects use BIVIPs. In each case, the effectiveness of the BHPs is evaluated by the road agent or the City Engineer (Dover) after major rainfall events. Typically the inspections showed the measures were working. None of the towns surveyed used pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers to any extent. In Dover, herbicides are used typically for control of poison ivy on strictly a complaint basis. There is one staff person qualified by the State of New Hampshire to handle agri- chemicals. Fertilizer is only used infrequently by Dover in the ce mete ry. B . Snow Plowing and Sanding: In the 1995-1996 season the survey area had a near record snowfall of 112.5 in. In the previous season, there was only 60 in. For this past year, Dover listed 18 snow-plowing operations and 18 sanding operations, Rollinsford had 14 plowing operations and 21 sanding operations. Barrington had a combination of 26 snow operations. Farmington had 26 plowing operations, and 12 sanding operations. In Dover, Barrington, and Rollinsford, 100% of the plowing operations included sanding. In Farmington, only about 12% of the plowing operations included the spreading of sand and/or salt. Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 0 -6 11 In each of the towns surveyed, the operators of the plow trucks are trained on the job, by riding with experienced operators, and at some point switching with the experienced driver. Operators from Dover and Barrington attend the annual snow plow rally. None of the towns have a formal training program. In Barrington, three town-owned, and 2 contractor-owned trucks with V-box, slip-in spreaders plus one contractor-owned V- box permanent mount spreader truck are used to plow and sand the roads. The six plow routes for these trucks are indicated on Figure 6. The sand and salt spreaders were not calibrated. Application rates may be varied with controls in the truck cab. Barrington also uses pretreatment just as the snow flakes begin to fall. Their pretreatment mix is the same mix of salt and sand that is used at other times. The mix ratio is 5:1, sand:salt. Barrington does not spread sand with every pass of the plow, but will pretreat, and then plow off the snow and return to sand the bad spots afterward. The hills (Mt. Misery, Beauty Hill, Chesley Drive, Deer Ridge and Lee Oak Road) are sanded after every pass of the plow, as are the major intersections. The snow plowing begins after approximately 2-3 in. Of snow has fallen. Priority is given to bus routes, and those roads through hilly terrain. Gravel roads are done last, usually after 4-5 in. of snow has fallen. Priority routes are typically plowed twice for every plowing of the lower priority routes. Priority routes and problem areas are indicated on Figure 7. Barrington does not haul snow, but rather stockpiles it at each site. Barrington uses approximately 4000 yd 3 per year of a sand/salt mixture. They apply approximately 200 yd 3 per year of straight sand to gravel roads in the winter. These roads are shown as dashed lines in Figure 6. Their material is stored at the town dump in a storage shed which has the capacity to hold 400 yd 3 of mixed sand and salt. It can hold up to 60 yd 3 of salt. Mixing is done on an asphalt pad in a ratio of 5:1. They will be constructing a new storage facility in the near future, approximately 300 ft from the current facility. The shed is three-sided, with the front covered by 6 mil plastic. There is no surface water control structures at the storage shed, but groundwater is monitored at the dump where the shed is located. No elevated levels of salt have been reported. A second stockpile of sand is at Second Crown Point Road, on bare ground with a tarp cover. Rollinsford has only two plow routes, and two trucks with V- box slip-in spreaders. None of the spreaders were calibrated. It does not have established priority plow routes, except that the Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report h 12 police and fire departments are plowed out first. The two plow routes are shown in Figure 8. Plow crews begin their operations after 3-4 in. of snow has fallen. Roads are sanded with a sand/salt mix of 8:1 after the roads have been plowed. Exceptions are on hills, where the roads are sanded with each pass of the plow. No pretreatment is done, nor are prewetting agents used. Rollinsford does not haul snow, and only cleans snow from the intersection areas when visibility becomes a problem. The Rollinsford storage facilities consist of a salt shed on an impermeable concrete slab,. Which holds only the salt. The shed is enclosed on three sides, with no door. Mixing is done outside on the bare ground. The mixture is stored outside and covered with a tarp. There is a perforated pipe installed in front of the shed door, and a gully behind the shed. Otherwise, no surface water control measures have been used. Rollinsford uses approximately 800 tons per year of sand and 100 tons per year of salt. Farmington operates on a bare pavement 48 hours after the storm policy. They have 5 trucks with uncalibrated V-box slip-in spreaders, and a one-ton pick-up to do the cul-de-sacs. Farmington is split into 6 plow routes plus a sidewalk tractor route. The routes are described as 1.) Main arteries in and out of the downtown area, shown in Figure 9, 2.) East side of town, 3.) West side of town, 4.) East side of the outlying area, 5.) West side of the outlying area, and 6.) Dead end roads, fire station, school yard, and town hall. There are no established priority routes. The same operators and equipment are assigned to each route for every storm, except for sickness or breakdowns, respectively. The plow crews begin to spread sand almost immediately, with a 3:1 mix of sand:salt. If the snow is wet and "greasy" the plows begin to work right away. If it is a fluffy snow, they wait until at least one inch has fallen to start plowing. No pretreatment is used, nor are any prewetting agents added to the salt mix. On gravel roads, only straight gravel is spread, no salt. Snow is occasionally hauled from the town square, and from Main Hill, Central Hill, and Tappan Street. In addition, intersections are cleaned as needed and the snow hauled away. The snow is deposited at the landfill. In Farmington, the salt shed is located at the landfill. It consists of a 100 by 30 ft building with concrete walls and a wood frame structure with an asphalt-shingle roof. There are three bays, one with capacity for 300 tons of salt, and two for the sand/salt Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 0 h; = 13 mixture. An asphalt pad extends 40 ft beyond the shed on which the mixing is done. There is no surface water control structures, but groundwater is routinely monitored at the landfill, and there has been no evidence of elevated levels of salt. Farmington used approximately 8000 yd 3 of sand this year, which they sift themselves. The rural towns maintained the same mix of sand and salt for both snow storms or ice storms. In Dover, they pretreat major arteries and collector streets using salt prewetted with liquid calcium chloride just before a snow or ice storm hits. After one inch of snow is on the streets, the trucks begin to plow. After 2-4 in. of snow has fallen, the trucks begin to sand. The trucks do not sand with every pass of the plow, but when the temperature is below 300 F, the plow trucks usually spread a layer of sand as they plow. When the temperature drops below 10' F, liquid calcium was substituted for salt. After the plowing, Dover usually sands the roads if they hadn't before. If conditions warrant, a sand/salt mix is used. Dover's policy is to reach bare pavement conditions for storms over 2 in. within 24 hours after the initial 2 or more inches of snow on all priority I and 2 streets. Typically the Dover priority I and 2 streets are plowed twice for every one time plowing the lower priority streets. The priority intersections may be sanded up to 20 times more than the roads in a snow storm. In a typical ice storm, the priority intersections may be sanded 10 times in a 24 hour period. The priority routes are based on part on the traffic flow volumes, shown in Figure 10. The majority of the priority I and 2 routes and the priority intersections are shown in Figure 11. The priority one streets are indicated in orange, the priority 2 streets are shown in green. Snow is removed and hauled away from the downtown Dover main street areas and downtown parking areas. The snow is deposited in a Dover area parking lot. This is a problem for Dover; there is very limited space in which to deposit snow. Dover makes use of a fleet of 10 plow trucks with V-box slip- in spreaders, 4 trucks with tail-gate spreaders, I truck with a 40- yd' roll-off spreader, and two trucks with tow-behind spreaders commonly used for pretreatment. Each spreader was calibrated. Typically the same truck and operators a@e assigned to the same routes each time out, with the exception of breakdowns or sickness, respectively. Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report A- 14 in the past year Dover used approximately 2000 tons of salt and 2500 tons of sand on the roads. Salt is stored in a three-sided, roofed storage bay at the Public Works facility on River Street, which has a 200 ton capacity. Sand is stored behind the garage. Mixing of sand and salt is presently done on a gravel surface. Typically only enough is mixed at a time for one storm, resulting in short term storage on a permeable surface. There are no surface water control measures at the storage or mixing sites. C. Soil Stabilizers: Soil stabilizers, or dust palliatives are used in Barrington and in Farmington. In both towns, liquid calcium chloride is spread on a gravel road. This application tends to increase the binding of the soil particles to each other, and thus reduces air-borne dust. Barrington last year used two 20 gallon drums of liquid calcium chloride on Scruton Pond Road. They used to use waste oil in the distant past. Farmington applies approximately 0.3 gallons/yd2 on the dirt roads in late April or early May. The dirt roads are each approximately 14 ft wide. D. Street Sweeping and Debris Removal: All the towns surveyed do some sort of street sweeping to remove the grit and dirt from the road before it is washed into the drainage system. Dover sweeps all the city streets annually in the spring. In the summer months, the downtown areas are swept once a week from May to early September. The sweepings are taken to behind the Public Works Garage on River Street, and mixed with brush. Ultimately the material is used as fill. Dover does not track the amount of material recovered from the streets, but estimates the recovery at 50% of the material spread, or approximately 1200 tons. Barrington collects only the sweepings from the intersections and cul-cle-sacs. The Class V roads are side swept, removing the granular material from the paved road surface, and pushing it onto the shoulders. Typically, 8 yd 3of material is recovered per year, and stockpiled behind the town garage for use as fill. Rollinsford sweeps all of their streets once a year, in the spring. The volume of material recovered was reported as 40-50% of the volume spread. The material recovered is stockpiled at the transfer station, for future use as solid fill. Farmington also sweeps its in-town streets, those shown in Figure 9, on an annual basis in the spring. They recover approximately 280 yd' of material, which is stockpiled at the landfill for use as backfill. Their streets are swept by a contractor. Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 15 V. Salt and Sand Loading Preliminary calculations were made using the information obtained from the survey to estimate the non-point source distribution of sand and salt in each town. The results of this analysis are presented below for the surveyed towns. Barrington used approximately 4000 yd' of sand and salt mixture this season on the paved Class V roads. This value included approximately 750 tons of salt, or approximately 500 yd'. Assuming the priority routes are sanded twice for every sanding of the non- priority routes, and estimating the priority route mileage as 15 miles, the annual application rate for the non-priority routes are approximately 49.8 yd 3/ mile. This annual application rate is roughly equivalent to a well rounded 5 gallon bucket of material spread over a 3 ft length of highway. The application rate for the priority routes is double this value, or 99.6 yd 3/Mi le. Considering just the salt, the total salt application rate for the entire year was 7.46 yd 3/ mile. This is equivalent to approximately 7/8 of a gallon - milk jug of salt spread over one 3-ft long section of roadway. On unpaved roads, only sand was applied, at a rate of approximately 20 yd 3/Mi le, or roughly half of what was applied to the paved roads. In Rollinsford, there were 15 miles of plowed roadways. Allowance was made for approximately 1 mile of problem areas (shown in Figure 8) which received twice as much material as the remaining roads. The annual usage for this season was 533 yd 3 of sand and 67 yd 3 of salt. The loading rate for sand was 33 yd 3/ mile, and for salt it was 4.2 yd 3/ mile. Farmington did not have priority routes, or areas which received special attention, and consequently a disproportionate amount of sand and salt loading. Approximately 4000 yd 3of sand were used this season on 66 miles of paved roads and 22 miles of unpaved roads. Straight sand was applied to the unpaved roads, representing 25% of the total mileage. Approximately 800 yd 3 of salt was applied to the paved roads, at a ratio of 3:1 sand to salt. The resulting application rate was 45.5 yd 3/mile for sand, and 12 yd'/mile of salt. In Dover, the usage of sand was 2500 tons per year, or approximately 1667 yd 3per year. Dover also used approximately 2000 yd 3 of salt per year. The salt usage has been increasing in the past few years, and it is expected to continue to increase. Dover has 125 miles of paved surface, and 20 mile of unpaved roads. The priority I and 2 routes shown in Figure 10 represent approximately Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report A 16 50 miles, which typically receives double the amount of sand and salt as the rest of the paved surfaces. In addition, 15 priority intersections are sanded on the average of about 20 times for each storm. It is estimated that the material spread on these intersections is roughly equivalent to an additional 28 miles worth of road surface. The net result is that the annual loading rate of sand in Dover is 7.5 ydl/mi of sand for the non-priority routes. The priority routes receive approximately 15 ydl/mi of sand per year. The rate of salt application is not directly proportional to the sand usage, since Dover pretreats with salt. Thus, the volume of salt used is actually greater than the volume of sand. The application rates for the non-priority roads was estimated at 9 ydl/mi for salt. The priority routes received double that, or 18 yd'/mi. A comparison of the rural loading rates and the urban loading rates is presented in Table 1. The table shows that of the rural communities, Barrington and Farmington, operating under bare pavement policies, have a slightly higher application than that of Rollinsford, which does not have a strict bare pavement policy. Farmington has the highest salt content in its sand/salt mix, and consequently has the highest application rate of salt of any of the towns. Application rates are similar between Barrington and Farmington, especially with respect to sand. The rural communities have a significantly higher sand application than that reported by Dover. Dover does have a higher salt application rate than all but Farmington. Table 1. Comparison of Sand and Salt Loading of the Selected Towns Town Sand Loading Rate* Salt Loadi@@Rate Barrington 49.8 yd 3/Mi / 20 7.5 yd 3/Mi. yd 3/Mi Rollinsford 33.0 ydl/mi 4.2 yd 3/Mi Farmington 45.5 yd 3/Mi 12.0 yd 3/Mi Dover 7.5 yd 3/Mi 9 yd 3/Mi Priority route rates are doubled. The figures presented in Table I represent only the application loading rates. If the volume of material recovered from the street sweeping is taken into consideration, the net loading to the environment is, in some cases significantly less than that indicated Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 0 A- 17 in Table 1. Two communities reported significant recovery of material from the roadway surfaces. Dover reported that as much as 50% of the material spread was recovered by the street sweeping program. In this case, the net sand loading rate would be 3.25 yd 3/Mi for the non-priority routes, and double that for the priority routes. Rollinsford also reported recovering approximately 40-50% of the volume of sand spread in their street sweeping program. The net loading rate to the environment would be 16.5 yd 3/Mi of sand. Farmington reported recovering 280 yd 3 of material from the town streets this past year. The town streets constitute approximately eight miles of roadway. This represents approximately a 75% recovery rate for in-town. This would reduce the environmental loading of sand in Farmington to 11.4 yd'/mi. The rural areas of the Town of Farmington still maintained the 45.5 yd 3/Mi loading rate. Barrington reported recovering only 8 yd 3 of material this past year from the major intersections. This is represents only 0.2% of the total loading, therefore there is no significant reduction in loading. The net environmental loading rates for the towns surveyed are summarized in Table 2. Dover has by far the lowest sand loading rate of any of the towns surveyed. Table 2. Net Environmental Sand Loading Rate Town Net Sand Loading to Environment* Barrington 49.8 yd 3/Mi Rollinsford 16.5 yd 3/Mi Farmington 11.4 (in town)/ 45.5 yd 3/Mi (rural) Dover 3.2 5 yd 3/Mi *: Priority Routes are Doubled. VI. Conclusions and Recommendations The objectives of this study were to identify the types of potential non-point source pollutants that are associated with standard highway maintenance practices in both an urban and rural setting in the coastal region of New Hampshire. A second objective was to try to quantify the loading of these pollutants, and map the distribution of the pollutants. Finally, the third objective was to evaluate the procedures used to gather the information presented in this report with respect to future efforts. Pollutant Loading Mapping Final Report 18 The study has identified the most prevalent substances being introduced into the environment is sand and salt. Sand and associated fines can contribute to the sediment loading of surface waters, increasing turbidity. Salt can affect both surface waters and groundwaters beneath the roadways. Liquid calcium chloride is applied to gravel roads in two towns. In Barrington, dirt and sediment from ditches and drainage structures is spread on site, leaving the potential for the material to be washed into the drainage waters again. A significant reduction in the environmental loading of sand and potential sediment is realized by sweeping the roadways and collecting the sweepings. Both Dover and Rollinsford reported up to 50% recovery rates. Loading rates were estimated based on the information provided in the surveys. These rates ranged from 33 -50 yd 3/M He of sand on rural roadways and from 4.2 to 12 yd 3/ mile of salt. The urban loading rates were much lower for sand, 7.5 yd 3/Mi . The salt usage was comparable to the surrounding communities. As to general maintenance practices, all the communities surveyed had similar practices. The winter roadway maintenance program of the urban community was more sophisticated, but the rural communities compared favorably with what was being done in the urban areas, especially given the more limited financial resources and similar land areas as the urban area. The urban area had significantly more roadway mileage, requiring a more intensive maintenance program. The survey and interview procedure was successful in obtaining useful information which has lead to the evaluation of non-point source loading rates for sand and salt. At this point a follow-up interview would be recommended to verify the information interpretations used in this report, and to obtain more details to aid in the distribution mapping of the material. In some cases, clarification would as to the extent of the priority routes which typically receive more loading for a given storm event than non-priority routes would have enhanced the analyses. In most cases, the required information was obtained by interviewing only the Road Agent or Public Works Director of the municipality. Future surveys in urban communities may be enhanced by interviewing not only the public works director, but also the supervisors which report to the director, to obtain specific details of the maintenance practices. NEW HAMPSHIRE it COASTAL REGION: MOO%` 44 r FIELD 1992 POPULATION DENSITY 1% rn C MIDDLE- Po(som p4r sq"s mllA.- fox 0 - 250 250.1 - _500 MILION 500.1 - 750 J/ 750.1 or grecier Farmington I SCALL 1 V-ch f 0 M@ f t z ITT- ----------- Rollinsford Barrington y . .. . I -.. '_ NO-RIHY000 i -. , ' , * *..,. / I o er '@4 D ver ZONE C DEERFIELD Lf I I I F XEV CANDIA CASTLE e T T "BURY" 00, CRESTE F VE" T, Plscafoqua coosici Besbn bou-Kkrle:s CO-nly bou-)d<" ---------- krJctpd bourxkry Wbp prodxod cl Nj 0fr,04 qf Sicis P4y*-4 JKXU n V94. Figure 1. Pilot Study Town Locations Ilk, Beayeii-Oam- '0ifl, TE HES ThotWsorr K// Uathews- Hill 16 EE I.-P V Hall HVi ly EE PAGE 79 @T' 6368 VVIL; L pi:k \) Sladberry Hi*# 7 yvortf.@ itti-CounItry Club MER N Picketing Fobndry ckwaief ..it 0 Aqwmllcus cummifl Oesmf ivec A, A. Cfocke@s + at , ; . . C assing III VCentra llinsf 6d erwick' T rc -E'Se A, EE P b I i7l' Ong . ..... 67 8 POWde, e17 house Cacheco n Park a ./N,' S 0 Ga( or Witch t,-or H. 0 n":, ewe t/ @n, n, i V . . .............. UJIlegO Pldh7S ;1 44 YOU 4 E.40'RO V E R Fill t eas.717C Swasey Hill,' he/Z 79A ,s Hill Thz@d Hill r_B Be Inv - A, ould Coiner Uk Madbun (,7g R. i, 116. , 7"@ Du&e Hill Great Madbur C'. HN Raitr Hill A **411 Se '@r Hill 11 .-y X'@' Slate 0 T. Eli Re&S A, I ISSA rTF ' * * .. .. Nv+,I,\ Uarsh H11, Y178 H1h 9 PAGf,59, j\ U.* ty A .11@ Nur a Uni,r f@i Tu 1.". 1 O-ncp H4 C..it iin " I Surrsef @j 0 rl@w Ice x .03 er Ri r nnar D(nec r V Criats Carriett 3 niel B'h gi da - 1A -Urrace _,%ry ma - ohys. JL @S Solt Ht# ..ulliv'xo Bridge - @? Carrie(/ cle V1 1,)M AM uih Hr. Ift4l, dn I Packers f 11 J *6. LL - @HE S R ,L, H,7f 1;ckorv Pond Golf r-0 B@ IF t HI Figure 2. Town of Dover Road Map. L" 8507F tain Tr2il Merrill Comerttl\ 0'. .@g F A.R. M,1 -V .Jet).ck Po.d P -j V er 0 C E R 4 ao" Pml so eaderb Uamef airier 4.1 41. R,xhe51,r Heser,-r Ilk 4 11 EN7 ey "Z111, F@,,O R@ 0 41i C t G o. 7 Roch ten a. @y Club Pu ,g Po.d @6016 icket ng /704 o es, La P-Wage eyri lb '15 A. el ij A Cot: rzo LA c Goll Lout Sw6y hluckleb&7? KO%Gt CIA A.1 B sl@gtoh ;,T6 virp@y ve cast San@ringtan A -P. P 1* 4,..- P id d Po-L lwjll@gc P1. o?_+1k o", 49 8e"y HIV Igicng H171 A -0 11W HIv I / . .- AA : I .- , I P, U1 am ".4 x j Coop RI' N27jv \3@ @z auth Barritiq on .7 v HW S" e r0se Cea W' U R/ est Notba am M; itg For 1, .2 ,Irr A @e HR /C S V A nt Non win ham lb 46J6 jj!@ Fjue arnexs q1eve,7s Hill. YIV P N M"-,c sr Oil P ,d is . ry A Un;v Ouke Hd A Nom h.. St. e FO*r at:, Fin HIR. C 0., Cedar % F,,, vy e -Weduesda --A WedUesda Figure 3. Town of Barrington Road Map. Rollinsford @,7: A. 'Iscatqguo- it@ r 4. A V ::.r?. C ro c 6-f i's" 6o s sn g z .1v cum ings ollinsfor SoUth BerrwICK C entral Park V Y.S; 1; z7 oflin.s .0@d 15tati n 40 rz@ ;@@Y`. elw y nt. a ri-@ 7 V@ Fletche Hill a t e sCr r`,,,, Z@ .0 @43 S Wentwo -Douglas Ho ital arnilton Hou Garrison/Hill A :W: "G4z a3 :77L. 3- ? Id er. kNI,orme 199 t"M as VS A I fQ a 'nt (800452-5931 ag 14.00 Secondary SR, Road, Hwy R*p Large City ue Jul 30 13:24 1996 cale 1:31,250 (at center) Major Connector A Summit 2000 Feet State Route _EL Hospital I or 1000 Meters Primary State Route Locale utility State Boundary Railroad Population Center 13 Point of Interest Land 0 Town, Small City Lake, Ocean Figure 4. Town of Rollinsford Road Map. N ew urham. 163 M srrx" % h wMA Ourham COrDel i \Ne Hay@lc. fid9e__Umej UAG -kpwpec @_AUSIO _N 1. r? t A4 @qrmlng A, Z. es )jation Club I 41' Ao Dextet, Cofnef LockE@s CGM_@r 10 G,, -0- A, c@' pta 41 T2 S*. E EP ATT sc,uton Cif b SF com T it m Merfill 411@eqm H@x este, x: b.l,b.ck Po.d 0 c GO tan Comets er Ott eaderb COM d @fo '58f Rcich@jfer r hesle H;11A, p N G Bef rys COM r /* eate t 7 R h r /6016 po-I :1 /204, 4112 _S 6W 7Z) 6evnert lxwf ST CJV Figure 5. Town of Farmington Road Map- SU I# Ilu Coco. R I XE w3rom OLD WLL 0) (D 0 0 CL CL 19 360, c V 4-8- 'Figure 8. Rollinsford Plow Routes Farmington 41 rL YALLF % U VV ORE.. 4A( Farmington '7. d j, V -7 r,7 'e@ ...... 7 7 y -7 Wh LLn' itchous@ MO ta.n:. - *A J: ';-7 o". V; C-tf] R064@ij 11 96 ',L@et Atl@5 U',S @Q Ell fa to@b : (, Mag 15.00 - Secondary SR, Road, Hwyi Woodland n Jul 28 18:49 1996 ale 1:21,875 (at center) State Route Sand 2000 Feet I 'Primary State Route Contour 500 Meters - Utility River 1 Railroad - - - - Intermittent River 0 Town, Small City Summit Population Center Figure 9. Farmington Downtown Area DOVER TRAFFIC VOLUME$ 4124 In 0 f14 > 0 23193 2 .35 Z but 17.949 No'c Al . ............ Taken from Roadway Management Report, Cfty of Dover Engineering Department, 1994. 2 6 7 DOVER mo-h A I PARK (11-114 4c or c SEE PAGE 30 Central Park A flicker Hill IF NumeRive mpf" sf@f m-ri; wh" mp "it 11 w"oa At "ad A IS7 $I F4 COLEBROOK Flo 2ND $1 F4 1.1;DWAY PARK A3 Its -ton Mt RD 3FR) ST E4 MILK SO E4 4 ST E3 MILL $I IM Rollinsfor IM ST F4 MINERAL PARX OR E2 @\tatl 57 9 arm SO D2,03. f4 MORROESTS4 OMER WOR H S At ORIN ABBOTT ST/I ADELLE DR I" D4 MOFUN?$I C3 DRKS 11AAll ORD all too 6728 I ""' I RADAR R" T111 CITY go A191FITA.0 MOSE RD AT f\ ALLEN ST A2 MOUNT PLEASANT no ALUMNI OR 13 05 Id Pand ANGLE ST MOUNT wilmoN sT APPLEVAL E4 M ARDO OAKS ULLIGAN DR go eme(ery ARCHIST F3 MMAVE3 if ARCOLA SO t3 N PINE SI IS AR ELSON ST F4 Kelwy Park AMMONAV04 I'll IOU "O"ROOK Flo n EW YORKST 1A VOO B ASH ST D4 NEWPORT RD H5 ATKINSON $I FAI NEWTON ST B3 ATLANTICAVES RILES DA GOT AUBURN SO 83 on IS ST 65 Fletcher Hill AUSTIN DR K5 NOFGHWAYCIAC3 G Afi q Corner AUTUMN ST E3 NUTE RD K7 AVON AV E3 OAK HILL On D3 Cemetery BACK no 61 DARIO ST 05, 111 BACK ROVER AD H4 010 COLONY no is BAKER SO ES OLD DOVER POINT AD _U4 BARRY SO C3 J6 BARTLETT ST D3 OLD ENGLISH BEECH Flo H5 VILLAGE RD C3 BELKNAP SO 04 OLD KNOX MARSH RD BELLAMY PARK RD 03 OLD LITILEWO TH BE"tLAMYRDG3.13 PARK no 02 R 0- 0 R Q BELLAMY WOODS J6 01.01ITTLEWORTH BERKSHIRE IN KS RO G3 11A BERWICK SO 05 DID MILL LN of C e m f I C -M BIRCH OR K5 OLD ROCNESTIFIRD BIRCHWOOD Pl. H4 A2, 83 IROADWAYD5 OLD ROLLINSFORD BROOKLINE AVMIM E3 RD 05 to BROWNING on G5 OXBOW LM 02 CARR AD AT PACE AV CA W e@'h t rih-Dou lasq If 3pliall ifNn*UCWG AV CATARACT AV H3. PA In PARK ST E4 CEDAA SO E5 PARKER ST 04 CEDARBROOK OR (3 PARTRIDGE tHid ou .0 Aq 4 ne bostyli. cmnanooftwm PAUL sT Is e 0 To IlZE3 PEARL ST D5 CENTRAL " C3. EA. PI ILLIP SO A2 scho Fork I - IA, M4 PIERCE ST [4 40 CHABOT ST A4 PIRECTIEST IN B3 MESLIT CMARLESSTH4 PISCATAOUA RD K4 CHESLEY ST D4 PLAZA OR B3, C3 $110JC R111:51) -eme(ery CHESTNUT 51 F4 PLEASANT VALLEY Flo 4 0 EYENWE SO At J3 Xt ST G4 oollAtior 0= PLEASW VIEW CIA Cr HIGH 111001 ON CLEMENT AD All E2 I I SO COCRA)GE AV 04 PO OLAND $I IS .......... Sit$ A, COCIRECO SO 10. IS PORTLAND AV 07 COUNTRY CLUB EST PAIRIKE SO E4 Flo PREEN. [I E ST/112 EAT COURTSTG5 PROGRESS DR 112 r V(3 BE V CRIAN ROOK 1-1482 PROSPECT CRESC ITT AV CA PROSPECT SO F3 CRESIVIEWORC3 RAINBOW DR K4 -?k CRES IVIEW GRPIKI REDDER $I D4 C3 R(NAUOAVH5 OVER CROSSSIES ESERVOIASIrIIJD4 CUSHING Flo is 1ICHMOMO 31 FA MR, HAM f ISTC4 DOVER S RY RIVER SO FS OANDU ONES DEERFIELD on n TVFFIDALE AV K5 RE 10915 %A@ DIMON I'll A"Go, CUSHING SO F4 RIDG OBINAIDGE) AV K4 ORO A DOVER POINT AD 15, ROGERS SO ES A@. s y , iii 11 - 11 if ROLLINS RD A?, 86 4 111 ST AN C, ASIE4 ROOSEVELT AV D4 GULF RD DONALIBY CT 03 ROSE ST DS GREW Flo X4 11 DURELL GAR 1415 RUTLAND ST 64 Cemete DURHAM AD 144. J3 S PIK SI G5 A P@@ f COW-ORD ST (4 SAIN JDHNSI/11414 EARLE S183 SALEM AV 15 EAST SO AA, ES SCHOOL ST/I 13 FS ILA ST DS SEABORNE OR KS ERJOT PARK M5 SI(ADOW OR JS SHADY tR JIS ILMVIEWCIAGS SILWRDCX twill 114 ELMST GA 10"I Clu@b@ ELMWOODAV(6 SMAVVIJEE tNA2 ESSEX ST E5 SHAWStNJS in [ON EVERETT SI [5 SHERMAN ST 03 @!ry Ls.- FAIRtIELOORH3 SILVER ST G3.G4 all Park FAIRVFEWAV/IvstG SILVER ST EXT G3 FEDERAL ST GS S=1 FtDnII H4 JER ST GAI TER CIF4 S FISIN M TH WELL RDC3 ro A SNOW AV D4 r FLORAL AV DA SHOWS CI 14 si LORENCE SO DS SOMERSWORTH RD t IOLSOM SO F4 AT AS AV, - I TOAFSTSTE5 SONNETT ST IS In[( MAN CT is SORRIFY RUN SO J3 t'oodm n I till 4#4, IFIRMAPICIn ES SPAULDING IPK F2. Woodman P I- I- \ 11 06 W CONIC All 11 1% . I I / J-1 FRESHFI RD K3 is. K? GAGE ST 93 SPAULDING SPR or, Sit Pt,, GAR S TURN IKE 02 G R:SON LN GA. K5 AS ROJ4 PRING'ST GA x GAR S104 AA SPRUCE DFI X4 Park FARM jj EK IT S UCEDFV1T,X4 111111 0 A, GEORGE ST IS SPA \Ivoodman Tj@n'(j j- IRAKVY ILMM SO CA AW Q, G PRUCE OR J4. KS ark G (WREStAVC3 SPUFIAOJ5.X? A HHl Gt NVIEW OR AS A STAR V GLENWOOOAVC2 STFX .RORO. GOOD'Al TOGAS SUILIVAN DR 93 44 Cemet GRANHE ST IS SUMMER S1 G4 N I Inift College! 8.-.. OR IN SfF4 SUMMER DR 19 OUT GRE EIRSIfIVIAS SUNSET DR KI GREENFIELDDRJS SYLVAN ON 13 GROVE ST E4 TANGLEWOOD DA K5 GULF RD 16 F7 up TtNNYSONAVGS D, 0 V E R HALL ST CA TETRIAUDR.14 Ce HAM ST F4 THOMPSON AD Gs CAI tX HAMILTON IiI G4 TIDEVIEW DR J5 SHIA PARKNO r 10 HAMPSHIRE CIA 12 lo"RIAL"Is -5 HANCOCK ST ES FOILING RD E2.13 "OnKtil DO wyers "-cr HANSON AV Go TOWLE AV G3 HAARSONSTG5 TRAKEY SO CA HARTSWOOD AD M3 TFtf-CtrYRDM V KAWTMOFNE RD HS TUVILE LAI J? J HAYES L" 115 TWOMBLY rk HEATHER LN D2 UNION ST GS HEF40CX COVINKS VALLEE ST 02 HEMLOCK FOR 13 VARNEY ST D4 In HENRY LAW AV GS. WCONCORDIST G4 lvo@ "",4 OR, 5 0 ORO Bellamy Ps HERITAGE DR AT WASHINGTON $I F3, .4 Dover INALLINGFORDSTFS . ... i G6 . ... MIT RIDGE on D5 IA Bells "Y' Rive HIGH5193 WATSON LN A?, H5 HIGHLAND AV 05 WATSON $I GAT HIGHLAND ST F3 WEDGEWDOO AD M (s WERANCTIONAV82 ---------------- WILLING ORPM20 Wtuo. ST Gs "OWE CI 04 WEStERMAV)Q "ORME Sl r4 WESIGATEDAW HDUGli $I E4 WHITTIER $10 HUaUKFtqy IN KI W11LDROOAVC2 emele HULL " IM WRLANDAVIII Pudding H#7 V WXMRD83 INDUS TRIAL PARK RD WIRLAND PORCI AD 93 A PORANE3 WIHSTONAVH5 11r, JAMESSTJAI WOODLAND RD H5 JOL JERMISSSTn LIMA WOOOMM PARK GAT Dover Point Road KEELEY OR GS, KS 111 G4 k CP IQIWYNORS4 YOUNG 31 FS C 0 KENNEDY CIA F3 DID C < OMNI AV "S ArrRIIIl 0 (D K1RJQ)M 51 FAI DIV cl;@h ter) Olt Kum MARSH no It? LAKE ST B3 LAKEVIEW OR 93 LAW.AST(ASLRII jj Car 0 schoo I GS 8 1 "INGTONST14 I [RDA AV K5 tISA KIM DR Q Et tfrrLrAFORT14ROG2 l(TRIAU OCKE $I GS LOCUST SO 144 DUN ST 03 0 RULE ONGAAFADOW RD HIS ------ "ONG MILL Flo AT :p ORING AV E3 I. ark LOWTIL AV CIA swctl of SO F4 =E SO (4 K MAPLEWOMAV82 M D B R N) MAST AD n. J4 ORMOR I. MCCANIE IN G6 MI- MCKINNA 31 JS sro M I 01-11-11 MERIDIAN OR JS WxKt[Kp" I MERRY ST CA V MESERVE AD K4 kfe MIDDLE RD 06. MY. J? Lorrine lip yRiverWhIA MIDDLE $I A4 0 C: r+ I I I APPENDIX A. Survey of Road Maintenance IPractices I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Larry Brannaka Ph-D. P.E. Research Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Office, UNH (603) 862-1545 form RS1.0-1996 University of New Hampshire Department of Civil Engineering/ Technology Transfer (T2) Survey of Road Maintenance Practices This survey was adapted from a survey conducted in Minnesota to reflect the information we are seeldng. We realize the information requested is quite detailed, and that not all of it may be available. Please gather as much of the information as you can. You may attach copies of lists, routes, schedules, etc., as applicable, to minii-nize the time involvement. Try to be as accurate as possible. Identify that information which is not recorded or otherwise not available. If you have any questions as to our intent, or meaning, pass over that particular question, and we will discuss it later. I will contact you to arrange a meeting where we can work on completing this survey together, C, 0 or at least you can point me in the direction of the information you have available. 1. Snow Removal and Traction Management General Information 1.) Name of Jurisdiction: 2.) Present Population in Jurisdiction: 3.) Centerline nuiles of roadway of- Unpaved roads: Paved two-lane roads/ local streets: Multiple lane/major arterials: State or Federal highways: 4.) Number of the following features: Cul-de-sacs/dead ends: Bnidges: Alleys: Other (specify): 5.) Indicate approximate % of the type of curbs in your jurisdiction: surmountable biturninous right angle concrete barrier other: (type & percent of total) 6.) Types of drain inlets in Jurisdiction: (approMimate % of total) curb openings: grate inlet: other (specify): 7.) How often are drain inlets inspected? cleaned? 8.) Where is collected debris disposed oV 9.) Percentage of storm drains connected to sewer fines? 10.) Percentage of storm drains discharging to surface water? Snow plowing / sanding 11.) Recorded total winter snowfall 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 12.) Total number of snow-plowing operations in: 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 13.) What percentage of above snow plowing operations included'sanding salting in: 1993-94 % 1994-95 % 1995-96 LO i 14.) Total number of sanding salting operations in: 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 2 15.) Was there any difference in the amount of sand and salt applied during a snowfall event compared to an ice storm, ONO ClYes If Yes, please explain? 16.) Please fill the table below for the personnel manpower evaluation for snow removal: Snowplowing Snowplowing Personnel Employee Data Supervisors Regular Staff Back-up Staff Contract Staff Number of snowplowing emplovees Employee Man-hours 94- 95 Employee Man-hours 95- 96 List Plowing Contractors 17.) Please indicate the type of equipment used in your jurisdiction for spreading sand and salt: Sand/Salt Spreading Equipment Calibrated? Number Yes I Frequency No Trucks equipped w/ Tail-gate Spreaders Trucks w/ V-box, Perm. Mount Spreaders Trucks w/ V-box, Shp-in Spreaders Trucks with Tow-Behind Spreaders Trucks equipped w/ Other Spreaders (list): 3 IS.) Please complete the following table with descriptions of the route locations and the operators and equipment assigned to each route if applicable, or attach route assignment sheets. No. Route Description )perator(s) Spreader(s) 4 19.) Are priority routes established for first snow plowing and road treatment? C3 No CI Yes If Yes, complete following table with route number or descriptions of their locations (or attach priority list): Fliionity 1 Nority 2 Elfion*ty 3 Location Route Description Location Route Description Location Route Description 5 20.) Are priority intersections identified? 0 No C3 Yes If Yes, please indicate location in the following table, or attach a summary sheet. Priority I Priority 2 Priority 3 Location Route Description Location Route Description Location Route Description 6 2 1.) How many snow plowing routes in jurisdiction? 22.) Are the same operators assigned to the same routes for each snow/ice event? ONo C)Yes 23).) Are the same plows and spreaders used on the same routes for each snow/ice event? C3 No C1 Yes 24.) How often are priority routes plowed in relation to lower priority routes? 25.) Are the roads sanded with every pass of the plow? 26.) Is computerized routing software used in the Jurisdiction? 0 1 27.) How often are the routes reevaluated? 28.) What kind of training do snowplow operators receive? 29.) After what amount of snowfaU do crews begin to plow? 30.) After what amount of snowN1 do crews begin to spread sand? 3 1.) After what amount of snowfaU do crews begin to spread salt? 32.) Are anti-icing measures or pavement pre-treatment methods routinely used prior to SnowfiLlIs? C3 No C3 Yes If yes, describe methods: 7 33.) Is the salt or salt/sand mix roufmely pre-wetted? o No El Yes If yes, what procedure is used? And, what material is used to pre-wet? (i.e. salt brine, chernical, water..) 3 M.) Please summarize the material use and the circumstances under which each is used. Proportion and Conditions for Use Materials Used I Total Usel Unit Costi (percent material used an.d weather conditions for use) Sand only Salt only (no sand) Salt/Sand Mix Dry Calcium Chloride Liquid Calcium Chloride Alternative Delcers (specify) Other: 8 Material Storage: 35.) Please fill out the table below with respect to the storage of sand and salt: Number of Storage Facilities d -T. Facility Salt Sand Salt/San Location(@ Dram Mix Control Outside covered pile on impermeable pad Yes/No Outside covered pile on ground surface Yes/No Outside uncovered pile on impermeable pad Yes/No Outside uncovered pile on ground surface Yes/No 36.) What type of storage facilities are used for sand and salt? 37.) Are the storage facilities fully-, partially- or not- enclosed? C3 No U Yes If Yes, describe: 3 8.) Is water runoff controlled around the storage facilities? 0 N 0 C1 Y e s If Yes, describe: 9 3 9.) Is water runoff controlled around the mixing and loading areas? 0 N 0 Q Y e S If Yes, describe: 40.) Is infiltration controlled at each storage site? 0 No Q Y e s If Yes, how? 4 1.) Is infiltration controlled at each mixing / loading site? 0 N 0 El Y e s If Yes, how? 42.) Does part of clean-up operations include: a. Removing snow windrows? 0 No Q Y e s If Yes, where? b. Hauling and disposing of snow? L'J No Q Yes c. Cleaning intersections? ONO oYes d. Cleaning medians? ONO QYes e. Other? (specify) 43.) Where is the removed snow deposited? 44.) How is the effectiveness of the snow plowing/removal program evaluated? 10 EL Soil Stabilizers 1.) Are soil stabilizers or dust palliatives used? 0 No QYes If Yes, indicate where: 2.) How often are they applied? 3.) What is used? UL Bridge Maintenance Practices 1.) Number of bridges in jurisdiction? 2.) How often are they inspected? 3.) How often are they repainted? 4.) What methods are used to collect and dispose of old paint debris? 5.) Where is debris disposed of7 6.) How often is grit (sand) removed fi7om the bridge surfaces? IV. Street Sweeping and Debris Removal 1.) What streets or route areas have debris swept? 2.) How often are streets swept? 3.) Where is the swept material disposed of? 4.) Is the volume or weight of the collected material recorded? 5.) Is the percentage of grit recovered calculated? If so, how? And, typically, what is the recovered percentage?- 6.) Is the collected material stockpiled? 0 No C1 Yes If Yes, Where? If Yes, what is the ultimate use of the material? 12 V. Catch / Sediment Basin and Culvert Maintenance 1.) Number of catch/sediment basins in Junsdiction 2.) Where are the major sediment/catch basins located? (attach list if available) 3) Inspection frequency of the basins: 4.) Cleaning &equency of the basins: Where is the removed sediment disposed of? 5.) Are outfalls and outlet structures inspected? Cl No Ek Yes If Yes, how often? 6.) Where are the major culverts located? (attach list if available) 13 7.) Do culvert outfaUs have sediment traps? 0 No El YeS If Yes, what is their cleaning frequency? And where is the sediment disposed of? 8.) Are there vegetated waterways 'in the jurisdiction? ONO QYes IfYes,Where?_ 9.) Are vegetated waterways inspec ted, cleaned and repaired? ONO QYes If Yes, what is the ins pection frequency? If cleaned, where is the sediment disposed oV 14 V. Pesticide, Herbicide and Fertilizer Apptication 1.) If pesticides, herbicides or fertilizers are used in annual maintenance procedures, please complete the Mowing tables: Uf more space is needed, use the back of the form) Pesticide (type) Application Application Locations of Application Frequency Method Herbicide (type) Application Application __T@tions of Application Frequency Method T Fertilizer (type) Application Application _F___To7ations of Application Frequency Method 2.)Do you have a pesticide-herbicide management program? 0 No 0 Y e s If Yes, please describe: 15 VL Construction Practices 1.) Are Best Management Practices (BMPs) used at municipal construction sites? 0 No Q Yes 2.) Are the effectiveness of these practices evaluated after rainfall events? Cl No C3 Yes If yes, what were the results? If Yes, how are they evaluated? 3.) Are ditches kept open by regrading or excavating?. C]No QYes If Yes, how often? And where? (Attach list if availabl 4.) Where is removed debris disposed of? 5.) Are BMPs used in the ditches during this operation? 0 No U Yes If Yes, what type? 6.) Is vegetation typically removed in the ditches during this operation? 0 No El Yes 7.) Are ditches reseeded after regrading? C3 No C3 Yes 16 8.) Are damaged roadside vegetated areas reseeded? ONo UYes 9.) Are damaged roadside vegetated areas mulched? 0 No El Yes 10.) Are damaged roadside vegetated areas fertilized? 0 No 0 Yes Form Completed By: (signature) Title: Date: Phone 9: 17 I I I APPENDIX B. Interview Questionnaire for Survey of Road Maintenance Practices I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Larry Brannaka Ph.D. P.E Water Resources Research Professor Civil Engineering Office, UNH C (603) 862-1428 form RS 1. 1- 1996 Interview Questionnaire for: Survey of Road Maintenance Practices University of New Hampshire Department of Civil Engineering (Complete these questions during interview -*vith jurisdiction representative and iiith completed Survey of Road Maintenance Practices form RS 1.0- 1996.) Jurisdiction: Person(s) interviewed: Date of interview: 1. Snow Plowing / Sanding 1) Does Jurisdiction have a written snow plan or policy? If so, who has it been approved by? 2) Are policies different for different snow storms and conditions? If so, how? 3) How many times have policies been used in 1995-96? 1994-95? 4) Specify snowplowing policy procedures, if set according to: a) Class of street. b) Level of service desired. c) Time of day. d) Amount of traffic. e) Weather conditions. f) Other (spet*,). 1) Are these policies communicated to the employees? If so, how? 6) Are these policies communicated to the public? If so, how? 7) Does jurisdiction have a bare pavement policy? If so, specify. (i.e., type of roads, specific roads, particular intersections) 8) Does jurisdiction have a policy for snowplowing and sanding/ salting sidewalks? 9) WMch sidewalks are: plowed? sanded? salted? 10) Where is Salt and Sand stored? j) How is runoff controlled around the storage facility? k) How is runoff controlled around mixing and loading areas? c) When is the salt delivered? d) How is it handled? e) What happens to carry-over volumes? 11) How many miles of State and Federal highways in jurisdiction? Are there cooperative agreements? 12) Does jurisdiction share or cooperate in the use of equipment, personnel, or duties? If so, please list- a) Materials: b) Equipment: c) Operators: d) Plowing service: 2 e) Other: Please specify with whom- f) Other governmental jurisdictions: g) Other departments.- h) Other group s/interests: U. Pesticide, Herbicide and Fertilizer Application 2) Is there a staging area for mixing and tank loading of a) Pesticides? Where? b) Herbicides? Where? c) Fertilizers? Where? 2) Does staging area(s) have runoff control features? If so, what are they? Do they require maintenance? 3) Where are chemicals stored? 4) How is the application equipment cleaned? 5) Where are they cleaned? 6) Are there controlled drains at the cleaning / staging areas? 7) Where is drainage routed / disposed? 8) What is done with excess chetmicals in the application tanks? 111. Other Aspects of Road Maintenance Practices 3 I I I I I I Interviewed By: Date: I I I I I I I I I I I 1 4 1 I I I APPENDIX C. Survey of Road Maintenance Practices Summary of I Responses I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Larry Brannaka Ph.D. P.E. Research Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Office, UNH (603) 862-1545 University of New Hampshire fonn RS1.0-1996 Department of Civil Engineering/ Technology Transfer (f) Survey of Road Maintenance Practices Summary of Responses This survey was adapted from a survey conducted in Mnnesota to reflect the information we were seeking. It was sent out to the Road Agents or Public Works Director of each municipality for them to review and gather together information. An interview was scheduled within two weeks of sending out the surveys. At the interview, we went ouver the survey in detail, and gathered additional information through the conversations that ensued. Of the four municipalities surveyed, only one had filled out the survey forms in advance. The responses to each of the survey questions are concisely summarized below. 1. Snow Removal and Traction Management General Information 1.) & 2.) Name of Jurisdiction-, Present Population in Jurisdiction: Dover: pop. 26,800 Barrington: pop. 6,700 Rollinsford: pop. 2,600 Farmington: pop. 5,800 3.) Centertine miles of roadway of Centerline Roadway Miles FD-over Banington Rollinsford Farmington Unpaved roads 20 10 22 Paved two-lane roads/local streets 125 52 15 66 Multiple lane/major arterials 0 State or Federal highways 126.5 123.2 1 17 1 15 4.) Number of the following features: Roadway Features Dover Barrlgton Roffinsford Farmington Cul-de-sacs/dead ends: 27 27 16 3/13 Bridges: I I I+ I RR owned I I Alleys: 0 0 0 5 Other (specify): 5.) Indicate approximate % of the type of curbs in your jurisdiction: Curb Types Dover Barrington Roffinsford J Farmington Granite Barrier 80% 50% z 1.5-2 rm'. Bituminous Barrier 15% 100% 50% 0 Concrete 5% 0 0 0 6.) Types of drain inlets in jurisdiction: (approximate % of total) Drain Inlets Dover Barrington Roffinsford ngton Grates 100% 100% 100% Curb openings Catch Basins 2050 1 Ditches only 200 7.) & 8.): Drain Inlets: Dover igton Rollins ord Farmington Drain inlets inspected As needed As Needed Annually Annually Drain inlets cleaned 500/yr As Needed 10/yr September Debri Disposal Turnkey Shoulder/Dump Transfer Station Landfill Notes: 1. Dover stockpiles some debri, and mixes it with brush behind their highway barn. Petroleum contaminated soils/sediments disposed as a hazardous waste. 2. Barrington cleans the ditches and leaves the material along the shoulder, or if there is too much, it is collected and transported to the dump. 9.) & 10.): Stonn Drains Dover I Barrington J Roffinsford Fannington Percentage of storm drains < 10% None Basement drains None connected to sewer lines only Percentage of storm drains > 90% 1000/0 Foundary Street 20% discharging to surface water Area Snow plowing / sanding 11.) Recorded total winter snowfkll in: 1993-94: 48 in. -1994-95: 60in, -1995-96: 112.5in. 2 12.) Total number of snow-plowing operations in: Number of Snow Plowing Coerations Dover Banrington Rollinsford Famu'ngton 1993-94 Rec. Not Avail.- No Record No Record No Record 1994-95 9 No Record 2 1 1995-96: 18 26 14 26 Percent operations includ.sand/sait 100% 100% 100% 12% 14.) Total number of sanding / salting only operations in: Oper.s I Do _TB_ R m Famiington Number of Sanding/Salting Only ver arrington oll' sford 1993-94: Rec. Not Avail. No Record No Record No Record 1994-95 : 9 No Record 7 No Record 1995-96: 18 Includ. above 21 12 15.) Was there any difference in the amount of sand and salt applied during a snowUl event compared to an ice stonn? Dover: C3 No V Yes In icey conditions: pretreat. Below 10' F no salt, used liquid calcium chloride. Barrington: V No 0 Yes Rollinsford: V No 0 Yes Farmington: V No 0 Yes 16.) Please fill the table below for the personnel manpower evaluation for snow removal: Snowplowing Snowplowm'g Personnel Em2loyee Data Super-visors Regular Staff I Back-up Staff 1. Contract Staff Number of snowplowing employees Dover Barrington 1 4 0 4 -Roflinsford 1 3 12 0 -Farmington 7 19 0 3 17.) Please indicate the type of equipment used in your jurisdiction for spreading sand and' salt: Salt and Sanding Equipment Dover Banington Rollinsford Farminjgo.n 4 Trucks equipped w/ Tail-gate Spreaders Trucks w/ V-box, Perm. Mount Spreaders 1: 40 yd. Roll I (Contractor Off owned) Trucks w/ V-box, Slip-in Spreaders 10 3: Town owned 2 5 2: Contract owned Trucks with Tow-Behind Spreaders 2 Trucks equipped w/ Other Spreaders Oist): I ton pick-up for cul-de-sacs E ment Calibrated? If so, Frequency? Yes, 3-4 yrs. No No No 18.) Route Locations. Route Sheets attached at the end of the summary. 19.) Are priority routes established for first snow plowing and road treatment? Dover: C3 No V Yes See attached fist. Barrington: 13 No V Yes See attached list Rollinsford: [I No V Yes Fire department and Police Department on Main st. Farmington: VNo C]Yes 20.) Are priority intersections identified? Dover: C3 No V Yes See attached sheet. Barrington: C3 No V Yes Mt. NIisery, intersections along Rt. 125, Beauty Hill, Province IM along State routes. Rollinsford: V No 0 Yes Farmington: V No Q Yes 4 Questions Dover Barrington Rollinsford --7Fannington 2 1.) How many snow plowing 22 3 Town 2 6 routes in jurisdiction? 3 Contractors 22.) Are the same operators Yes Yes Yes Yes assigned to the same routes for each snow/ice event? 23.) Are the same plows and Yes Yes Yes Yes spreaders used on the same routes for each snowfice event? 24.) How often are priority routes 2:1 2:1 NA NA plowed in relation to lower priority routes? 25.) Are the roads sanded with No No No No every pass of the plow? No No No No 26.) Is computerized routing software used in the jurisdiction? Annual Annually NA Seldom 27.) How often are the routes Debrief (usually) reevaluated? 28.) What kind of training do snowplow operators receive? Dover- Instituting cross training with supervisors, and experienced operators, once a year they attend snow plow rally. No formal training. Barrington- Ride along with experienced operators, supervised before soloing; snow plow rally. Rollinsford: Ride along with experienced operators, supervised before soloing Farmington: New person operates wing plow with Road Agent, then they switch. After 2-3 storms, they go on their own. 5 Question: FD-Over Barrington -TR-ollisford Ff!@Wington 29.) After what amount of I in. 2-3 in. 3-4 in. Wet & heavy: snowfall do crews begin to plow? right away. M. 30.) After what amount of 2-4 in. Pretreat with After plowing Right Away snowfall do crews begin to spread sand/salt mix. sand? 3 1 .) After what amount of 2-4 in. Also Pretreat with After plowing, Right Away snowfall do crews begin to spread common to sand/salt mix. direct salt on in salt? pretreat emergencies. 32.) Are anti-icing measures or Yes. 3 or 4 Yes, with No No pavement pre-treatment methods trucks with sand/salt mix liq. Calcium routinely used prior to snowUls? Chloride to spray on sand/salt, priority areas 33.) Is the salt or salt/sand mix routinely pre-wetted? Dover: V No U Yes Barrington: V No Q Yes Rollinsford: V No 0 Yes Farmington: V No Q Yes 34.) Please summarize the material use and the circumstances under which each is used. Dover Barrington Roffinsford TF-armington Sand only 200 yd@/yr (Dirt 0 Gravel Roads Roads) Salt only (no sand) ? Emergency only Emergency only Extreme Cond. Salt/Sand Mix ? 4000 yd3/yr 800 ton/yr. 8:1 z 8000 yd' 3:1 mix Dry Calcium Chloride ? 3 bags/yr 0 Not in winter Liquid Calcium Chloride ? 0 0 Not in wi Alternative Deicers (specify) ? 3/8 in. Stone on None None dirt roads None. MaterW Costs Dover Barrington Roffinsford Farmington Sand $7.50 /yd' $5.00 /yd' Sieve own Salt $29.66 hon $30.00 /ton 6 Material Storage: 3 5.) Please fill out the table below with respect to the storage of sand and salt: Number Storage Facilities Facility Salt Sand Salt/Sand Location(s) Drain Mix Control Outside covered pile on impermeable pad Yes/No Outside covered pile on ground surface Ye&No Outside uncovered pile on impermeable pad Yes/No Outside uncovered pile on ground surface Yes/No 36.) What type of storage facilities are used for sand and salt? Dover: Salt storage bay at the public works budding holds 200 tons of salt. Dover is planning to construct a new storage facility. Sand is stored uncovered behind the public works garage. The material is mixed on a gravel surface and stored there for a short duration. Barrington: Storage shed at the town dump has 400 yd 3 capacity for sand/salt mixture, 60 ton capacity for salt only. Mixing is done on a bituminous pad; 8:1 mix. A new storage facility will. be constructed in the near future, about 300 ft away. Rollinsford: At the town maintenance building is a salt shed on a slab. Sand and salt mixture is stored outside, covered with a tarp. Farmington: Salt shed at the landfill 10000 ft. With 8 ft concrete walls and a wood firame structure and asphalt shingle roof There are three bays, one for salt (300 ton), the remaining two hold sand/salt mix. (300 ton each). 7 37.) Are the storage facilities fully-, partially enclosed? Dover: No Yes 3 sided enclosure for salt. Barrington: No Yes 3 sided shed; front covered with 6 ml plastic, 1 pitch to the rear. Rollinsford: NO Yes Salt shed is enclosed on three sides with no door. Farmington: No Yes Three sided enclosure. 38.) Is water runoff controlled around the storage facilities? No Yes Dover: No Yes Water is channeled away from the mixing area and is kept out of the storage bay. Barrington: No Yes Groundwater monitoring at the dump ... site of salt storage. Rollinsford: No Yes Except for a perforated pipe outside the shed door, and a gulley behind the shed. Farmington: No Yes 39.) Is water runoff controlled around the mixing and loading areas? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes 40.) Is infiltration controlled at each storage site? Dover: No Yes For salt only. Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes None for mixing, just salt bay itself is on concrete pad. Farmington: No Yes Asphalt pad 40 ft beyond bays. Groundwater monitoring wells at the landfill. 4 1.) Is infiltration controlled at each mixing / loading site? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes Asphalt pad 40 ft beyond bays. Groundwater monitoring wells at the landfill. 8 42.) Does part of clean-up operations include: a. Removing snow windrows? Dover: No Yes Downtown main street areas; downtown parking areas. Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes Haul snow from the square, Main Hill, Central Hill, Tappan Street; also use a sidewalk tractor. b. Hauling and disposing of snow? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes c. Cleaning intersections? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Only if visibility problem, and then no hauling. Farmington: No Yes d. Cleaning medians? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes e. Other? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes 9 43.) Where is the removed snow deposited? Dover: In the downtown Dover area parking lot. This is a big problem, space limitations limit the options. Barrington: NA Rollinsford: In the past behind the mills on Front Street, but not for the last 34 yrs. Farmington At the landfill 44.) How is the effectiveness of the snow plowing/removal program evaluated? Dover: Public Feedback, annual internal debriefing, Police/Fire Feedback, Chamber of Commerce (merchant's opinion); "How would you spend it?" surveys to public. Barrington: Public Feedback, Selectmen or Administrator, Road Agent inspection. Rollinsford: Public opinion/feedback. Farmington: Public Feedback 11 Soil Stabilizers 1.) & 2.) & 3.) Are soil stabilizers or dust palliatives used? How often? What is used? Dover: V No 0 Yes Except for grading and the application of gravel on dirt roads. Barrington: 0 No V Yes Used two drums (20 gallons ) of liquid calcium chloride on Scruton Pond Road. Many years ago used waste oil. Rollinsford: V No El Yes Farmington: 0 No V Yes Liquid calcium chloride on 8 mi. Of dirt roads. Most 2 roads are 14 R wide, and they apply 0.3 gal/yd . Application is made once a year in late April/early May. Applied on the following roads: Sheep Bur-row Rd., Reservoir Rd., Canrod Rd., Proding Park Rd., River Rd., Waldron Cross Rd., Woodland Ac., Landfill Entrance, and Little City Rd. 10 in Bridge Maintenance Practices Dover Bamngton Roffinsford Farmington 1.) Number of bridges in 10 5 1 owned by I I jurisdiction? town. 2.) How often are they Annually by Bi-annually by Bi-annually by Bi-annually by inspected? NHDOT NHDOT NHDOT; NHDOT, annually by periodically by Road Agent Road Agent 3.) How often are they None done to I bridge in 1986 Timber bridge, Going to repainted? date. not painted. replace, not repaint 4.) What methods are used NA Wire brush & NA NA to collect and dispose of old paint scrape, debri not collected. debris? 5.) Where is debris disposed NA NA NA NA of? 6.) How often is grit (sand) Annually by Annually Not done. Grit Washed down removed from the bridge surfaces? street falls through annually with sweeping cracks into creek. river water...into prog. river. IV. Street Sweeping and Debris Removal 1.) What streets or route areas have debris swept? Dover: All city streets. Barrington: Side sweeping done on all Class V roads. Debri picked up at intersections and in cul-de-sacs. Rollinsford: All streets. Farmington: AJI in-town streets by contractor. Dover BL%@mon -FR-offinsford Farmington 2.) How often are streets Annually in Annually in Annually in Annually in swept? spring. spring spring spring Downtown once a wk from May to September. 3.) Where is the swept Public Wor-ks -Stockp-iled Transfer Station Landfill or land material disposed of? Garage at behind Town owner for fill. River St. Garage Temp. Deposit at Hom St. Park & Garrison Rd. 4.) Is the volume or weight No No No No of the collected material recorded? 5.) Is the percentage of grit NO No No No recovered calculated And, typically, what To be 8 yd3 40-50% 280 yd 3 is the recovered volume? estimated volume recovered. 6.) Is the collected material Yes, at River Yes, at Town Yes, Transfer Yes, at Landfill stockpiled? St. (Public Garage Station Works Garage) If Yes, what is the ultimate Fill, ground Fill Solid Fill Backfill use of the material? cover. IV. Catch / Sediment Basin and Culvert Maintenance 2.) Where are the major sediment/catch basins located? (anach list if available) I Dover Barrington Roffinsford TF-arinington 1.) Number of catch/sediment ? 5 35 None basins in jurisdiction 3.) Inspection frequency of the Complaint Annually Annually NA basins: basis 4.) Cleaning frequency of the 5 year cycle As needed When about half NA basins: full (@z 10/yr) Where is the removed Nfixed with In area of basin Transfer Station NA sediment disposed of? brush behind River St. -5.) Are outfalls and outlet Complaint Annually As time permits NA structures inspected? basis: 5yr cycle 12 6.) Where are the major culverts located? Dover: See attached fist. Barrington: (see attached map) Swains Lake, Causeway on Young Road, Tolend Road, Green Hill Brook, Berry River, Pond Hill Rollinsford: Along Route 4, Foundry Street to the river ftom town, Sullivan Way to stream from Hills, a couple on Main Street, gully behind Silver Street, a few culverts along the path to the River. Farmington: All over downtown area, back country roads, problem areas. I Dover Baffington Roffinsford EgLon 7.) Do culvert outfalls have Only on private No No 4-6 ft basin around property for inlet lined with sediment traps? oillgrease in rocks. paricing is If Yes, what is their cleaning Private owners Outlets dug down NA 4 yr cycle responsibility as needed frequency? And where is the sediment NA On site NA On site disposed of? 8.) Are there vegetated waterways Throughout city, No Sligo gully, Old Tamrod, Palsor,@ adjacent to NEU Lane; Transfer Oxbow, Madethoro in the jurisdiction? Cocheco River Station; Woods Road Road/River Rd. (privately owned) 9.) Are vegetated waterways Along Cocheco- No Mov@,@- over once a "Yes inspMted year insp cted, cleaned and repaired? annually If Yes, what is the inspection Annually NA Annually Annually, checked prior to large storm frequency? If cleaned, where is the sediment Turnkey NA NA Landfill disposed of? V. Pesticide, Herbicide and Fertilizer Application 1.) If pesticides, herbicides or fertilizers are used in annual maintenance procedures, please complete the following tables: Dover: Very little pesticide used, herbicide only on poison ivy on a complaint basis. Barrington: None used Rollinsford: None used Farmington: None used 13 2.)Do you have a pesticide-herbicide management program? Dover: No Yes One employee certified by the State for pesticides/herbicides. No formal staging areas, just shop. Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes VI. Construction Practices 1.) Are Best Management Practices (BMPs) used at municipal construction sites? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Contracted construction does, municipal; construction usually not. Farmington: No Yes Only during construction 2.) Are the effectiveness of these practices evaluated after rainfall events? Dover: No Yes Post construction inspection by City Engineer; field observations by employees Barrington: No Yes Road Agent check Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes Road Agent check If yes, what were the results? Dover: Favorable Barrington: Favorable Rollinsford: NA Farmington: Favorable If Yes, how are they evaluated? Observation 3.) Are ditches kept open by regrading or excavating? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes 14 if Yes, how often? Dover: Inconsistent .... on a complaint basis Barrington: As neeeded Rollinsford: As needed Farmington: Two to three times a year, typically last week of May, and during summer. And where? (Attach Est if available) Dover: No formal fist available Barrington: Grading on gravel roads annually, backhoe work on ditches on 5 yr cycle Rollinsford: No list available Farmington- No list available 4.) Where is removed debris disposed oV Dover: Turnkey Barrington: List of people in the area that want it. Rollinsford: Transfer station Farmington: Gravel pit 5.) Are BMPs used in the ditches during this operation? Dover: V No C3 Yes Barrington: V No CJYeS Rollinsford: &/No Q Yes Farmington: V No El Yes 6.) Is vegetation typically removed in the ditches during this operation? Dover: 13 No V Yes Barrington: C3 No VYeS Sometimes Rollinsford: 13 No V Yes Farmington: V No Q Yes 7.) Are ditches reseeded after regrading? Dover: C3 No V Yes Not always. Barrington: 0 No 6/ Yes Sometimes Rollinsford: V No Ll Yes Farmington: V No U Yes 15 8.) Are damaged roadside vegetated areas reseeded? Dover: No Yes As time allows. Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes Hydroseeded 9.) Are damaged roadside vegetated areas mulched? Dover: No Yes Sometimes. Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes Mulch included with hydroseeding 10.) Are damaged roadside vegetated areas fertilized? Dover: No Yes Barrington: No Yes Rollinsford: No Yes Farmington: No Yes 16 APPENDIX D. Dover Salt and Plow Routes, and Structures Requiring Maintenance Priority Salt Routes D-1 Plow Routes D-3 List of Church Sidewalks Maintained D-41 List of Bridges Maintained by the City D-42 List of Catch Basins D-43 NORTHSIDE SALT ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 HENRY LAW AVE to WASHINGTON ST SIXTH ST TO T/L PROSPECT ST CRESTVIEW DR WASHINGTON ST to MAIN ST COUNTY FARM RD CEDARBROOK DR OLD ROLLINSFORD RD MAIN ST to CENTRAL AVE COUNTY FARM CROSS RD BROOKLINE AVE VARNEY ST CENTRAL AVE NORTH to MIRACLE MILE WATSON RD MINERAL PARK DR HIGH RIDGE DR MIRACLE MILE NORTH TO CHILIS TOLEND RD PLEASANTVIEW CIR OLD ENGLISH VILLAGE CHILIS NORTH TO PORTLAND GLASS COLUMBUS AVE UPPER FACTORY RD MORIN ST LEFT AT PORTLAND GLASS TO 16B N WHITTIER ST FRENCH CROSS RD LAKE ST AREA RT 16B NORTH TO T/L GLENWOOD AVE ENDOFTOLENDRD __WlLLANDAVE_,__.. - ----- ------ TURN AROUND HORNEST GLENHILL RD STRAFFORD RD AREA GO 10 BACK TO PORTLAND GLASS GROVEST -MT. VERNON ST OLD ROCHESTER RD GO SOUTH TO MIRACLE MILE FOURTH ST NEW YORK ST CRANBROOK LN MIRACLE MILE TO CENTRAL AVE THIRD ST FIFTH ST MAPLEWOOD AVE GEN I RAL AVE TO LOWER SQUARE SECONDST LINCOLN ST COLONIAL PARK PORTLANDAVE _______FlRSTST SCHOOLST L'ONGHILL RD OAKST i STJOHNSSJ MECHANIC ST VARNEY RD BROADWAY ATLANTIC Sl REDDEN ST. BLACKWATER RD COCHECO ST COUNTRY CLUB EST DR HILLCREST DR VENTURE DR ROGERSST BARTLETT ST REYNERS BROOK DR WAZJHINGTON ST PLAZA DR FIELDSTONE DR CHESTNUT ST NORTHWAY CIR FOREST ST AREA GREEN ST BARRYST MWOOD AREA CRESCENT AVE FAIRWAY DR LG@:LENCREST AVE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS A- __ 2].. NORTHSIDE SALT ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 HE Y LAW AVE to WASHINGTON ST SIXTH ST TO T/L PROSPECTST CRESTVIEW DR WASHINGTON ST to MAIN ST COUNTY FARM RD CEDARBROOK DR OLD ROLLINSFORD RD MAIN ST to CENTRAL AVE COUNTY FARM CROSS RD BROOKLINE AVE VARNEY ST CENTRAL AVE NORTH to MIRACLE MILE WATSON RD MINERAL PARK DR HIGH RIDGE DR MIRACLE MILE NORTH TO CHILIS TOLEND RD PLEASANTVIEW CIR OLD ENGLISH VILLAGE CHILIS NORTH TO PORTLAND GLASS COLUMBUS AVE UPPER FACTORY RD MORIN ST LEFTAT PORTLAND GLASS TO 16B N WHITTIER ST FRENCH CROSS RD LAKE ST AREA RT 16-B NOR-THTO T/L GLENWOOD AVE .-------ENDOFTOLENDRD -WILLANDAVE---.- TURfJ AROUND HORNEST GLENHILL RD STRAFFORD RD AREA GO 10 BACK TO PORTLAND GLASS GROVEST MT. VERNON ST OLD ROCHESTER RD GO.SOUTH TO MIRACLE MILE- FOURTHST NEW YORK ST CRANBROOK LN MIRACLE MILE TO CENTRAL AVE THIRD ST FIFTH ST MAPLEWOOD AVE GENI-RAL AVE TO LOWER SQUARE SECOND ST LINCOLN S COLONIAL PARK PORTLAND AVE FIRST ST SCHOOLST LONGHILL RD OAKST STJOHNSS1 MECHANIC ST VARNEY RD BROADWAY ATLANTIC ST R E D D E.N. S T. BLACKWATER RD COC-HECO ST COUNTRY CLUB EST DR HILLCREST DR VENTURE DR ROGERSST BARTLETT ST REYNERS BROOK DR WAtiH.INGTON ST PLAZA DR FIELDSTONE DR .CHESTNUT ST NORTHWAY CIR FOREST ST AREA G,REE-N ST BARRY S ELMWOOD AREA CRESCENT AVE FAIRWAY DR GLENCREST AVE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 31 41. L SOUTHSIDE SALT ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 HENRY LAW TO HANSON ST ARCH ST BROWNING DR S. PINE ST HANSON ST TO CENTRAL AVE RUTLAND ST TENNYSON DR CHURCH ST CENTRAL AVE NORTH TO WASHINGTON CATARACT AVE BACK RD MIDDLE ST WASHINGTON TO MAIN ST ALUMNIDR BRICKYARD ESTATES KIRKLAND ST TURN LEFT AT THE FOUNTAIN MAST RD DOVER NECK RD ATKINSON ST CENTRAL AVE SOUTH TO STARK AVE MAST RD EXT EVANS DR ST. THOMAS ST STARK AVE TO DOVER PT RD GARRISON RD OLD DOVER PT RD ELM ST DOVE-R PT RD TO WILLIAMS CADILLAC HENRY LAW AVE END OF CUSHING RD WALNUT ST RE I URN TO CENTRAL AVE COURTST HAWTHORNERD BELKNAP ST CENTRAL AVE SOUTH TO DURHAM RD MIDDLE RD HUBBARD RD TOWLE AVE DURHAM RD TO MAST RD SPRUCE LN TO BACK RIVER BRIARWOOD LN WOODMAN PK AREA RETURN 10 LOWER SQUARE TUTTLE LN APPLEVALE AREA SUNSET DR LOCUS TOFTREE LN ELLIOT CIRCLE FAIRFIELD DR SILVER ST CUSHING LN GOVERNOR SAWYER LN BELLAMY EXT BACK RIVER RD SPUR RD BEECH RD OLD LITTLEWORTH RD PISCATAQUA RD DOVER PT BY NEWICKS LONG MEADOW RD OLD STAGE RD SIJRUCE LN COTEDR BIRCHWOOD PL RICHARDSON DR MAS1*.RD HOMESTEAD LN RENAUD AVE WESTWOOD CIRCLE BELLAMY-R,D-'--'-.- PINEVIEW DR ..-CHA-RLESST PROGRESS DR INDUSTRIAL PARK DR PEARSON DR MILL ST SUMNER DR CROSBY.-R-D ROBERTA DR WATSON ST LISA BETH CIRCLE BACK RIVER TO MAST RD ROBERTS RD WATSON LN REDDEN GARDENS SPRUCE LN TO DURHAM RD LANDING WAY ELMVIEW CIR SPRUCE DR NEW BELLAMY LN LOCKEST PARTRIDGE LN RIVERSIDE DR UNION ST ROBINWOOD AVE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 2] PLOW RUNS IDATE: SUPV: RUN TRUCK 11 1 LOCATION NO. DRIVER HELPER COMMENTS CITY ROUTE J_ APPLEVALE 79 iLAROCHELLE BACK RIVER 112 1LEMEUIX CENTRAL AVE NORTH 54 !HEALY CENTRAL AVE SOUTH 77 IGREGOIRE COLONIAL PARK 20 IWILSON COUNTYFARM 71 IFREEMAN DOVER PT RD 60 WHITE IHUGHES FISHER 76 PELLETiER I INDUSTRIAL PK 78 TRUDELL LABREQUE MORNINGSIDE AREA 52 -FLANAGAN MT VERNON 70 ALONZI IREARDON NEW YORK ST 73 TURCOTTE PORTLAND AVE 61 DEWS WASHINGTON 75 SNOW CONTRACTOR HENRY LAWIBACK RD GRADER GUPTILL THEN OMI 10 WHEEL TOLEND ROAD 6w AYER-JR DEAD ENDS/4x47F- 1) THOMPSON LN 45 4X4 2) SCHOOL ST 89 4X4 THORPE 3) STP 64 CHAPMAN 4) WATER 21 IPHIPPS 5) BACK RIVER 51 PRATT, J 6) WELLS 4X4 FAUCHER - SiDEWALKS CENTRAL AVE UNILOADER ALON DOVER-NORTH 83 IREED DOVER-SOUTH 82 IPILWESKI SNOW REMOVAL #1 IST. MARYS SCHOOL lalonq both sides of school IANGLE ST lone side near wall 1 IUNION ST Central to Court I side TRAKEY ST Central to Locust NORTH side only SILVER ST Central to Locust BOTH SIDES LOCUST ST Silver to Washington On Nelson St to Day Care CENTRAL AVE around CITY HALL WALNUT ST to Washington St ST. THOMAS ST near Telephone building and the Jr. High School 6 i t9 SNOW REMOVAL #2 1 ST. MARY'S CHURCH Third St side Include front of old B&M building along Fourth.St 2 FOURTH ST Chestnut to Dunkin' Donuts also near Temple 3 FIFTH ST Chestnut to Central 4 NEWYORK ST Central to Park St 5 SIXTH ST PARKING Central to Chestnut 6 BROADWAY Central to St. Johns 7 ST. JOHNS Both sides Durell St to corner 8 PORTLAND ST Main St to Mechanic St 9 MECHANIC ST Portland St to School St ISchool St to Main St SNOW REMOVAL #3 CLAROSTAT Both sides to River STAY AWAY FROM LIGHTS YOUNG ST Both sides PORTLAND ST Both sides to Cocheco St IORCHARD ST (near Spa an) Both sides Remove snow in small parking lot Remove snow behind Spartan in alley way CENTRAL AVE Liquor Store Parking Lot 3 FAYETTE ST Near Post Office GREEN ST Near Post Office BLOWER SNOW ROUTE I HENRY LAW To Lower Washington St 2 MAIN ST 3 CENTRAL AVE Ham St south to Trakey St BOTH SIDES Pick up pile at Christie Carpets 4 WASHINGTON ST Central Ave to RR tracks 5 SECOND ST 6 THIRD ST 7 CHESTNUT ST 8 FIRST ST APPLEVALE PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: &OUTE NOTES/COMMENTS i EELTY ST OCKEST PINE ST &ENTRAL > COURT NION ST LLIOT PARK NOTE: CLEAN CORNER AT BACK SIDE ELLIOTT OV. SAWYER LN PARK AWTHORNE RD JJIUBBARD RD RIARWOOD LN ICOLEBROOK RD ENT AVE PPLEVALE DR [WINSTON AVE ALEM AV IDDLE S HURCH ST NGLEST IRKLAND ST EWPORTST UPERVISOR COMMENTS s JH @K 1 @4 BACK RIVER ROAD PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS CENTRAL AVE STARK AVE TO DURHAM RD DURHAM RD BACK RIVER RD MAST RD PRUVEN CONCRETE TO BACK RIVER RD SPRUCE LN MAST RD TO GARRISON RD GARRISON RD PISCATAQUA RD DREW RD GOLD POST RD II I SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 4] I I CENTRAL AVENUE NORTH PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: MROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS MAIN ST ICENTRAL AVE MAIN ST TO CHILI'S INTERSECTION CENTRAL AVE CHILI'S TO WAASHINGTON ST CHESTNUT ST RFIRST ST ISECOND ST THIRD ST FOURTH ST CENTRAL AVE TO FIFTH ST JFIFTH ST JUNCOLN ST GROVEST SIXTH TO END : SUPERVISOR COMMENTS I] 2 31::_ :4 CENTRAL AVENUE SOUTH PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS MAIN ST CENTRAL AVE SECOND ST TO STARK AVE STARK AVE SILVER ST LOCUSTST WALNUT ST LONGMEADOW RD BEECH RD WOODLAND RD RENAUD AVE SHAMROCKLN KEATING DR HAYES LN BIRCHWOOD PL SMITH RD GREEN ST FAYETTE ST SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 4] I I COLONIAL PARK PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: IROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS AUBURN ST ESHERMAN ST LAKE S GAGEST SOLD ROCHESTER RD JOXBOW LN NPINECREST LN WILLARD RD WILLAND AVE ISTRAFFORD RD AT BACK CORNER PUSH BACK TO DRIVEWAYS WELLINGTON RD MAPLEWOOD AVE BE CAREFUL OF CORNER FOR WATER DRAIN ICRANBROOK LN @ ALLEN ST LL LLIP PHILLIP ST @SHAWNEELN _ W C I CHEYENNE ST COMMANCHEE ST MORIN ST COLONIAL PARK NORTH SOLD ENGLISH VILLAGE ESTER RD FROM CHILI'S TO PORTLAND GLASS SUPERVISOR COMMENTS mll 121 COUNTY FARM ROAD PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS SIXTH ST WHITTIER ST TO ROCHESTER T/L COUNTY FARM RD WINGS: WATCH FOR SMH IN DRAINAGE DITCHES ERIC DR COUNTY FARM CROSS RD LONG HILL RD SIXTH ST TO RTE 16 LONG HILL RD EXT TURN AROUND AWAY FROM DRIVEWAY & PLOW WIDE FIELDSTONE DR VARNEY RD VARNEY RD EXT BLACKWATER RD RTE 16B TO ROCHESTER T/L REYNERS BROOK DR VENTURE DR SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 AT WEEDEN DEVELOPMENT PUSH SNOW INTO ROAD 21 31 4] D-t- DOVER POINT ROAD PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: IROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS ]CUSHING RD SPUR RD BELLAMY LN OLD BELLAMY LN 9AYER'S LN JOAK LN SHILTON RE) :OOLD DOVER PT RD OV T T T OFTREEE LN IHILTON DR WENTWORTH TERR COTE DR %MESTEAD LN OM ST p V PINEVIEW DR DON'T CLOG DRAINAGE DITCH �PEARSON DR BELANGER OR ROBERTS RD ILANDING WAY ROBERTA DR V SID @RIVERSIDEE DR R SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 IN AN EMERGENCY YOU MAY BE ASKED TO PLOW OLD GEN'L SULLIVAN BRG- 2 CHECK CUTTING EDGES EVERY 2 HOURS j C- C :?31 CHECK MIDDLE AND BACK ROAD 14] PUR RD @B @E L My OLDBELL ER I @IJUIP ANVE FISHER STREET PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS TOWLE AVE WOODMAN PARK COMPLETE BEFORE 7AM - NOTIFY SUPV IF UNABLE TO COMPLETE PARKER ST CLIFFORD ST WOODMAN PARK DR RUTLAND ST ABBEY LN CATARACT AVE FISHER ST CENTRAL AVE TO BELLAMY RD ELM ST HAMILTON ST BELKNAP ST SUMMERST TRAKEY ST SPRING ST CHARLES ST CENTRAL AVE TO SEWER PUMP STATION MILL ST BE CAREFUL OF CURBS AT SAWYERS _jl SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 21 31 41 D-L. HENRY LAW and BACK ROAD PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: OUTE NOTES/COMMENTS ENRY LAW AVE OURTST ROWNING DR ENNYSON AVE ENNY LN LMVIEW CIR cKONE LN ANSON AVE IANSON ST ULLIGAN DR ACK RD IDDLE RD AAC LUCAS CIR RICKYARD DR UTHIES RUN OVER NECK RD UTTLE LN UPERVISOR COMMENTS INDUSTRIAL PARK PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS PROGRESS DRIVE SUMNER DRIVE INDUSTRIAL PK RD CROSBY RD FARADAY DR OLD STAGE RD RICHARDSON DR WESTWOOD CIR CONCORD WAY OLD LITTLEWORTH RD BELLAMY EXT BEVERLY LN W. KNOX MARSH RD WESTERN AVE WESTGATE MARTHAS WAY HARTSWOOD DR NOTIFY SUPV. IF PLUGS UP AT END FAIRFIELD DR SUNSET DR ALSO DO DEAD END OFF OF SUNSET DR BELLAMY RD LISA BETH CIR ALUMNIDR SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 3] 41 MORNINGSIDE AREA PLOW ROUTE ,t)RIVER: DRIVER: DATE: EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT: ROUTE ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS SYLVAN DR MAST RD EXT ADELLE DR SHADY LN PONDVIEW LN BIRCH DR GRADY LN HEMLOCK CIR PARTRIDGE LN AUSTIN DR ROBINWOOD AVE LINDA DR SPRUCE DR RIVERDALE AVE JAMES ST ARBOR DR KELLY DR MERIDIAN DR RAINBOW DR MORNINGSIDE DR BERKSHIRE LN SHADOW DR I-TANGLEWOOD DR SHAWS LN GREENFIELD DR SPRUCE LN EXT McKENNA ST ISUPERVISOR COMMENTS 3] MORNINGSIDE AREA PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS SYLVAN DR ADELLE DR PONOVIEW LN GRADY LN MAST RD EXT PARTRIDGE LN ROBINWOOD AVE SPRUCE DR JAMES ST SHADY LN KELLY DR RAINBOW DR BERKSHIRE LN TANGLEWOOD DR BIRCH DR HEMLOCK CIR AUSTIN DR LINDA DR RIVERDALE AVE ARBOR DR MERIDIAN DR MORNINGSIDE DR SHADOW DR SHAWS LN GREENFIELD DR SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 4] I I MT. VERNON STREET PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: I@OUTE NOTES/COMMENTS 7 T. VERNON ST LENWOOD AVE ORTHAM OR ILK ST ROVE S IJCHESLEY ST BBOTTST OOSEVELT DR ILOWELL AVE PAGE S SH ST WAPLE ST OUGHST ARTLETT ST ILLCREST DR OGAN AVE WORNE ST EDGEWOOD RD AK HILL DR EDDEN ST NOTE: BE CAREFUL OF PETROFF LAWN LENCREST DR NOTE: BE CAREFUL OF LAWNS lirRESCENT AVE NOTE: BE CAREFUL OF LAWNS ORNESTSCHOOL ESERVOIR ST ESMITH WELL RD UPERVISOR COMMENTS 12] H G G L GI NEW YORK STREET PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS PIERCE ST PREBLE ST NEW YORK ST EAST ST DOVER ST PARK ST HAM ST EAST CONCORD BAKER ST EVERETT ST FREEMAN CT COOLIDGE AVE PEARLST FLORENCE ST ELA ST FLORAL AVE HIGH RIDGE DR VARNEY S NOTE: TO LEFT AND TO RICHARD'S HOUSE BROADWAY OAKST CENTRAL AVE TO BROADWAY SECTION HILL ST TWOMBLY ST OLD ROLLINSFORD RD SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 4] I I PORTLAND AVENUE PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: &OUTE NOTES/COMMENTS IORTLAND AVE CENTRAL AVE TO OAK ST SECTION JORTLAND ST TLANTIC AVE TO COUNTRY CLUB RD OCHECO ST ROADWAY OGERS ST SSEX ST OREST ST ANCOCK ST T. JOHN'S ST AK STREET TO BROADWAY HREE RIVERS FARM RD OUNTRY CLUB EST DR ROSS ST AIRVIEW AVE LMWOOD AVE OUNTRY CLUB RD TO STONE WALL AIRWAY MEADOWS OUNG ST ATER ST OWER WASHINGTON ST FROM MAIN ST TO END OF WASHINGTON 1 UPERVISOR COMMENTS ------------ A R 0 c y N- 7 TOLEND ROAD PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS TOLEND RD OLD TOLEND RD WHITTIER ST FROM TOLEND TO GLENWOOD AVE GLENWOOD AVE FROM WHITTIER TO SIXTH ST CRESTVIEW DR 0 EN CUL DE SAC THEN 4 WHEEL DRIVE WILBROD AVE WILL COMPLETE PLAZA OR NORTHWAY CIR IDOES NOT INCLUDE IN FRONT OF OFFICE GLENHILL RD ROCHESTER NECKED TO BROX GLENHILL RD FROM TOLEND RD TO T/L FRENCH CROSS RD DEAN DR WATSON RD FROM TOLEND TO COUNTY FARM RD UPPER FACTORY RD COLUMBUS AVE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 21 31 4] L I I WASHINGTON STREET PLOW ROUTE MEQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ,ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS i .q ARCH STREET WCONCORDST BRICHMOND ST LEXINGTON ST CUSHING ST INFOLSOM ST INELSON ST WATKINSON ST @BELKNAP ST FROM WASHINGTON TO SILVER L W W S ASHINGTON ST �HIGHLAND ST PROSPECT ST SNOW'S COURT NFOURTH ST ITO INTERSECTION OF FIFTH ST IKENNEDY CIRCLE WALBERTA ST BROOKLINE AVE PLEASANT VIEW CIR IMINERAL PARK DRIVE AVON AVE Vo V L MPS :@HAMPSHIRE CIRCLE 1WHITTIER STREET CEDABROOK DR STTHOMASST NIHALE ST SUPE VISOR COMMENTS 1] '121 mJ31 141 IFUPER CONTRACTOR PARKING LOT PLOW ROUTES CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE TIME IT TAKES TO CLEAR EACH LOT. SUPERVISIOR TO CALL ALL CONTRACTORS WHEN WE SCRAPE -- THEY SCRAPE AMERICAN LIGHTNING ROD NOTE: RED 1 -TON HAS SANDER IF NEEDED 1) DOVER HIGH SCHOOL - BELLAMY PARKING LOT 2) DURHAM RD FIRE STATION 3) GARRISON SCHOOL 4) ARENA DAN AYER 1) LIBRARY LOT 2) WOODMAN PARK 3) THIRD ST 4) CHESTNUT ST A TONY'S 5) THIRD ST (LD SENIOR CENTER 6) CLEAN ISLANDS AROUND FOUNTAIN (LOADER) 7) LOWER SQUARE (LOADER) LIZOTTE NOTE: 45 MINUTES TO 1 HOUR TO ARRIVE 1) ORCHARD ST and FIREHOUSE RESTAURANT 2) FIRST ST 3) LOCUST ST 4) CITY HALL (2 LOTS) 5) BELKNAP LOT (LIQUOR STORE) 6) COURT HOUSE CoD ST. THOMAS ST 7) POST OFFICE 4-J CONSTRUCTION 1) PORTLAND ST 2) SCHOOL ST (LOWER LOT ALSO) 3) BROADWAY FIRE STATION 4) HORNE ST 5) BUTTERFIELD (FRONT and BACK) 6) RIVER ST 7) ISLANDS AT GLENWOOD AVE 8) WATER ST SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 .41 [1] -THOMPSON LANE 4X4 PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: zZOUTE NOTESICOMMENTS ITHOMPSON LN AUL ST @ ALLINGPORO ST ILE -q'f t6pdff ST ONNETT ST I&VENTWORTH ST OFF OF COURT ST ILES DR EDERALST ONROEST OFF OF LOCUST ST ERNS CT OFF OF FOLSOM ST J@VILLIAMS ST EECH RD DEAD END OODLAND AVE DEAD END cKONE LN ATSON LN DEAD END IWATSON ST DEAD END UPERVISOR COMMENTS �2] sI JF I W EQUIPMENT: [2] SCHOOL STREET 4X4 PLOW ROUTE DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS SCHOOLST MECHANIC ST ESSEX ST AT DEAD END GRANITE ST DANBURY CT COUNTRY CLUB EST PLOW CUL-DE-SACS ROSEST HIGH RIDGE DR FREEMAN'S CT N. PINE ST WINTER ST CEDAR ST MERRY ST RIDGE ST HALLST GILMAN ST WILLAND POND RD NEWTONST SULLIVAN DR EARLE ST COLONIAL PARK PLOW CUL-DE-SACS AVON ST IONA AVE ARCOLA S SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 1;31 [3] STP 4X4 PLOW ROUTE &QUIPMENT: DRIVER: STREET and LOCATION :INOTES/COMMENTS OCHECO ST STATION T- TRAFFORD STATION RANBROOK STATION RANBROOK CUL-DE-SAC ILL ST IFROM CHARLES ST STA TO END PRUCE DR STATION LISHING ST STATION CSTON HARBOR STATION ALSO DEAD END ACROSS FROM STA OSTON HARBOR RD EIGHTON WAY ILTON DR ENTWORTH TERRACE EAD END ACROSS FROM BELANGER DR IVERSIDE DR WPERVISOR COMMENTS 14] v (4] WATER 4X4 PLOW...-ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: STREET and LOCATION INOTES/COMM'ENTS HORNESCOURT ASH STREET EXT MAPLE STREET EXT DEAD END OFF REDDEN STREET SNOWS AVENUE HULLAVE IF LOADER NEEDED NOTIFY SUM END OF BARRY STREET CRESTVIEW CUL-DE-SAC'S VALLEY STREET (OFF GLENWOOD AVE) DOWALIBY COURT (OFF WHITTIER ST) AUTUMN STREET (OFF SIXTH ST) ERIC DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC (COUNTY FARM RD)_; DEAD END TOWARDS OLD COVERED BRIDGF- COLD SPRINGS ROAD MESERVE ROAD BACK RIVER RD -VETERANS BUILDING PLOW AFTER STORM OLD COLONY ROAD NUTE ROAD EVANS DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC CIRCLE AT BRITTANY PARK END OF MORIN ST PINECREST OFF TRAFFIC CIRCLE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 4] D-30 (5] BACK RIVER 4X4 PLOW ROUTE mEQUIPMENT: DRIVER: OUTE 11NOTES/COMMENTS 1@cKENNA DR HADY LN PRUCE LN EXT IRESIDENT TAKES CARE OF LEFT SIDE ABBIT RD Ir- Wp-LD GARRISON RD IFROM BAYVIEW TO DAVE HILL'S HOUSE 113AYVIEW RD TURN AROUND AT THE "Y" ISPRUCE DR IAT DEAD END PARTR DGE LN IAT CUL-DE-SAC YLVAN DR IIAT CUL-DE-SAC 48DELLE DR _11AT CUL-DE-SAC ISUNSET DR I AT DEAD END SHARTSWOOD DR -7AT END OLD CATARACT AVE AT DEAD END W. KNOX MARSH RD SUPERVISOR COMMENTS �3] rl,UPERVI z [6] WELLS 4X4 PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: WELL NAME and LOCATION NOTES/COMMENTS BOUCHARD WELL FRENCH CROSS RD CALDERWOOD WELL GLENHILL RD CAMPBELL WELL GLENHILL RD CUMMINGS WELL SMITH WELL RD GRIFFiN WELL MAST RD AT 2ND ENTRANC HUGHES WELL OLD STAGE RD IRELAND WELL MAST RD AT I ST ENTRANCE, LOWELL AVE STATION LOWELL AVE SMITH WELL SMITH WELL RD SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 21 3] 4] b-3z GRADER PLOW ROUTE _gQUIPMENT: DRIVER: TREET and LOCATION NOTES/COMMENTS ENTRAL AVE WOUTE 16 & 16B ( URHAM RD TARK AVE ILVER ST ORTLAND AVE WROADWAY HESTNUT ST ASHINGTON ST ELLAMY RD IXTH ST UPERVISOR COMMENTS 31 p s GRAVEL ROADS PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: STREET and LOCATION NOTES/COMMENTS BOSTON HARBOR RD ACROSS FROM DMV COLD SPRINGS RD OFF OF BELLAMY RD COVERED BRIDGE LN OFF OF GLENHILL RD IONA AVE OFF OF BROOKLINE AT FOURTH ST MCKONELN OFF HENRY LAW AVE OLD GARRISON RD OFF OF BAYVIEW DR RABBIT RD OFF OF BACK RIVER RD THOMPSON LN OFF OF HENRY LAW AVE THREE RIVERS FARM RD OFF OF GULF RD VALLEE ST OFF OF GLENWOOD AVE WATSON LN OFF OF WATSON ST SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 21 31 4] D -3,/ I I NORTHSIDE SIDEWALK PLOW ROUTE EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ENRY LAW AVE FROM RIVER ST TO MAIN ST (RIGHT SIDE) AIN ST FROM HENRY LAW AVE TO PORTLAND ST (RIGHT SIDE) ASHINGTON ST IN FRONT OF CLAROSTAT BLDG OUNG ST ORTLAND ST IN FRONT OF PRINT SHOP CHOOLST URN AROUND &T JOHNS ST FROM PORTLAND AVE TO BROADWAY (BOTH SIDES) ROADWA FROM CENTRAL AVE TO OAK ST (LEFT SIDE) URN AROUND AM ST FROM BROADWAY TO CENTAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) AM ST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO PARK ST (RIGHT SIDE) @PENTRAL AVE FROM HAM ST TO OAK ST (RIGHT SIDE) AKST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO PARK ST (RIGHT SIDE) URN AROUND NTRALAVE FROM RESERVOIR ST TO CHESTNUT ST (RIGHT SIDE) W YORK ST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO BROADWAY (LEFT SIDE) PIERCE ST FROM BROADWAY TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) l[OURTH ST FROM DUNKIN DONUTS TO CHESTNUT ST (RIGHT SIDE) OURTH ST FROM CHESTNUT ST TO ARCOLA ST (LEFT SIDE) URN AROUND -IFTH ST FROM CONDOS TO CENTRAL AVE (LEFT SIDE-) IXTH ST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO GROVE ST (LEFT SIDE) IJPIXTH ST FROM GROVE ST TO HORNE ST (RIGHT SIDE) ORNEST FROM SIXTH ST TO GLENCREST AVE (LEFT SIDE) ORNEST FROM CRESCENT AVE TO GLENWOOD AVE (RIGHT SIDE) LENWOOD AVE FROM HORNE ST TO WHITTIER ST (LEFT SIDE) URN AROUND .LGLENWOOD AVE FROM HORNE ST TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) &RACLE MILE FROM W D HOSPITAL ENT TO MERCHANTS BANK ENT (RIGHT SIDE) IRACLE MILE OPPOSIDE SIDE FROM BLOCKBUSTER ENT TO ASH ST (RIGHT SIDE) SH ST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO HORNE ST (LEFT SIDE) HESTNUT ST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO WASHINGTON ST (RIGHT SIDE) IRST ST FROM CHESTNUT ST TO CENTRAL AVE (BOTH SiDES) MECOND ST FROM CHESTNUT ST TO CENTRAL AVE (BOTH SIDES) UPERVISOR COMMENTS y T T T E E i T s-- ;H 'V JF 1 J2 EQUIPMENT: SOUTHSIDE SIDEWALK PLOW ROUTE DRIVER: HANSON ST FROM HENRY LAW TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) CENTRAL AVE FROM SILVER ST TO STARK AVE (RIGHT SIDE) STARK AVE FROM CENTRAL AVE TO STORE 24 (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND CENTRAL AVE FROM STARK AVE TO DURHAM RD (RIGHT SIDE) BACK RIVER RD FROM MILL ST TO GARRISON RD (LEFTSIDE) GARRISON RD FROM BACK RIVER RD TO GARRISON SCHOOL (LEFT SIDE) GARRISON RD FROM GARRISON SCHOOL TO AUSTIN DR (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND BACK RIVER RD FROM GARRISON RD TO SPRUCE LN (LEFT SIDE) TURN AROUND DURHAM RD FROM CENTRAL AVE TO ALUMNI DR (RIGHT SIDE) DURHAM RD FROM ALUMNI DR TO MAST RD (LEFT SIDE) CATARACT AVE FROM CENTRAL AVE TO BELLAMY RD (LEFT SIDE) TURN AROUND BELLAMY RD FROM CATARACT AVE TO DURHAM RD (LEFT SIDE) TURN AROUND BELLAMY RD FROM CATARACT AVE TC KNOX MARSH RD (RIGHT SIDE) TUNNEL ENTRANCE AT THE END OF W. KNOX MARSH RD SPAULDING TP TURNPIKE TO SILVER ST TUNNEL ENTRANCE END OF SILVER ST EXTENSION SILVER ST FROM OVERPASS TO TOWLE AVE (RIGHT SIDE) TOWLE AVE FROM SILVER ST TO CLIFFORD ST (LEFT SIDE) TURN AROUND SILVER ST FROM TOWLE AVE TO RUTLAND ST (RIGHT SIDE) RUTLAND ST FROM SILVER ST TO FISHER ST (LEFT SIDE) RUTLAND ST FROM PARKERST TO CATARACT AVE (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND. ISILVER S7- iFROM RUTLAND ST TCD CENTRAL A@7if iRIGHT SIDE) SILVER ST ENT @RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUNDI FROM CENTRAL AVE TO TEXACO STf ARCH ST FROM SILVER ST TO WASHINGTON ST (RIGHT SIDE) WASHINGTON ST FROM ARCH ST TO WHITTIER ST (RIGHT SIDE) WHITTIER ST FROM WASHINGTON ST TO HAMPSHIRE CIR (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND WASHINGTON ST FROM ARCH TO LEXINGTON ST (RIGHT SIDE) LEXINGTON ST FROM WASHINGTON ST TO SILVER ST (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND WASHINGTON ST FROM LEXINGTON ST TO CUSHING ST (RI HT SIDE) CUSHING ST FROM WASHINGTON ST TO SILVER ST (LEFT SIDE) TURN AROUND WASHINGTON ST FROM CUSHING ST TO WALNUT ST (RIGHT SIDE) WALNUT ST FROM WASHINGTON TO ST THOMAS ST (BOTH SIDES) WASHINGTON ST FROM WALNUT ST TO LOCUST ST (RIGHT SIDE) LOCUST ST FROM WASHINGTON ST TO ST THOMAS ST (RIGHT SIDE) LOCUST ST FROM ST THOMAS ST TO WASHINGTON ST (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND LOCUST ST FROM ST THOMAS ST TO PUBLIC LIBRARY (RIGHT SIDE) LOCUSTS WALKWAY TO LIBRARY FRONT DOOR LOCUST ST FROM LIBRARY TO FISHER ST IRIGHT SIDE) FISHER ST FROM LOCUST ST TO RUTLAND ST (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND LOCUST ST FROM FISHER ST TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) TRAKEY S FROM CENTRAL AVE TO LOCUST ST (RIGHT SIDE) COURTST FROM UNION ST TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) FISHER ST FROM LOCUST ST RUTLAND ST (RIGHT SIDE) TURN AROUND LOCUST ST FROM FISHER ST TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) TRAKEY ST FROM CENTRAL AVE TO LOCUST ST (RIGHT SIDE) COURTST FROM UNION ST TO CENTRAL AVE (RIGHT SIDE) SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 1] 21 31 CULVERTS AND WASHOUT AREAS STREET and LOCATION INOTES/COMMENTS CHECO ST AT PSNH BUILDING RTLAND AVE NEAR RAVINE RTLAND AVE AT PORTLAND ST OADWA ACROSS FROM RED'S AKER ST HOUSE #4 ERRY BROOK AT 6TH, HOUGH AND ASH ST URTH S NEAR KENNEDY CIRCLE LACKWATER RD ORNEST OUNTY FARM RD EMLOCK CIR XTH ST RAVINE 2 SIXTH ST ALONG EDGE OF PAVEMENT 0 0 0 R b-n EXTRA RUN HEAVY SNOW EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE NOTES/COMMENTS CENTRAL AVE !STRAFFORD FARMS TO MAST RD and STARK AVE TO ELLIOTT ROSE CO. GREENHOUSE RTE 16B JITO COLONIAL VILLAGE NORTH RTE 16 ITO PORTLAND GLASS CHESTNUT ST SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 21 3] 4) I I EXTRA RUN HEAVY SNOW EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: J OUTE 11NOTES/COMMENTS CODLAND RD ONGMEADOW RD EECH RD IRCHWOOD PL LLIOTT CIR IPUSH BACK SNOW EATING ST AYES LN HAMROCKLN ENAUD AVE MITH RD ENTRALAVE TARK AVE AIN ST OCUSTST ILVER ST RCHST ASHINGTON IFROM LOWER SQ TO WHITTIER ST HITTIER IFROM TOLEND TO GLENWOOD OURTH ST UPERVISOR COMMENTS 14] w BI K, @R iL b bq EXTRA RUN HEAVY SNOW EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: ROUTE INOTES/COMMENTS PORTLAND ST PORTLAND AVE MAIN ST FOURTH ST WASHINGTON ST WHITTIER ST SILVER ST DURHAM RD LOCUSTST CHESTNUT ST SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 CHECK BROADWAY 21 31 41 CHURCHES -- SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE &QUIPMENT: DRIVER: ISTREET LOCATION CHURCH NAME NOTES/COMMENTS ENTRAL AVE FIRST PARISH ENTRAL AVE ST. JOSEPH*S ENTRAL AVE ST.CHARLES HESTNUT & THIRD ST. MARY'S 110URTH & GROVE TEMPLE ISRAEL OCUSTST GREEK ORTHODOX ORTLAND AVE & MECHANIC ST. GEORGE MARONIT ASHINGTON DOVER BAPTIST UPERVISOR COMMENTS L L w BRIDGES -- CITY MAINTAINED BRIDGES FREEZE BEFORE ROADS EQUIPMENT: DRIVER: BRIDGE NAME and LOCATION INOTES/COMMENTS BELLAMY ROAD CATARACT AVE. CENTRAL AVE. CHESTNUT ST. FOURTH ST. GLENWOOD AVE. over TP SAWYER'S BRIDGE SPUR RD. over TP SIXTH ST. over TP TOLEND RD. WASHINGTON ST. WATSON RD. WHITTIER ST. SUPERVISOR COMMENTS 11 21 31 41 I NORTH SIDE CATCH BASINS JEQUIPMENT: DRIVER: STREET and LOCATION NOTES/COMMENTS CENTRAL AVE AT TASKER FUNERAL HOME CENTRAL AVE NEAR FRIENDLY MARKET ICENTRAL AVE ACROSS FROM SHOP&SAVE ENT @ LENW000 AVE NEAR CENTRAL OAK ST AT PARK ST AK ST ATBROADWAY PEARL ST AT CHURCH IIIIHILL ST NEAR #9 JE. CONCORD ST NEAR #5 @BAKER S NEAR HYDRANT PARK ST ATHAM NEW YORK ST ATPARK BROADWAY AT RED'S SHOE BARN BROADWAY AT PIERCE PORTLAND AVE IN "HOLLOW" IIIIATLANTIC AVE AT PORTLAND AVE. PORTLAND AVE NEAR SPINELLI'S APTS. COCHECO ST NEAR #108 RCOUNTRY CLUB EST IMT. VERNON ST BEHIND CHURCH IMT. VERNON ST BETWEEN HOUGH & ASH MT VERNON ST AT ASH ST ROOSEVELT ST NEAR HORNE HORNE S NEAR ASH ST EXT SIXTH ST AT HORNE ST 9SIXTH ST NEAR EAST COAST AUTO BODY @MAPLE ST NEAR HOUGH ST GROVES NEAR HOUGH ST CHESTNUT ST NEAR FIFTH ST ICHESTNUT ST AT FOURTH ST ST NEAR SNOWS CT CENTRAL @CENTRAL AK ST @PEARL ST IPORT@ANI COCHECO i @H,ORNE ST S XTH ST SOUTH SIDE CATCH BASINS EQUIPMENT: STREET and LOCATION DRIVER: NOTES/COMMENTS PLEASANT VIEW CIR WASHINGTON ST ARCH ST LEXINGTON ST LEXINGTON ST TOWLE AVE CUSHING ST LOCUST ST ST. THOMAS KIRKLAND ST LOCUSTST FISHER ST LOCUSTST BELLAMY RD LISA BETH CIRCLE DURHAM RD BACK RIVER RD BACK RIVER RD SHADOW OR LINDA DR AUSTIN DR MORNINGSIDE DR RIVERDALE DR KELLEY DR SPRUCE DR SPRUCE LN SPRUCE LN WESTWOOD CIR lommillmillm 3 6668 14101 9580