[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
FINAL REPORT PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED OUTLINE AND DIRECTION 'W'j PREPARED BY: DAVID C. BROWNLEE, PhD. AND TAMARA L. BLAKE co DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING CALVERT COUNTY 176 MAIN STREET PRINCE FREDERICK, MARYLAND, 20678 DECEMBER 31, 1991 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Preparation of this report was partially funded by the Coastal Resources Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, through a grant provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of Resource Management, National oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. TC 409 .B76 '99, PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED - OUTLINE AND DIRECTION INTRODUCTION Calvert County has adopted a Comprehensive Plan which directs growth toward Major and Minor Town Centers. This approach is consistent with the recommendations of the Governor of Maryland's 2020 Panel and current growth management theory. Three Major Town Centers have been designated and Prince Frederick, the County Seat, is the only one located completely outside of the Critical Area. Thus, extensive growth is expected in Prince Frederick. In some ways Prince Frederick is an environmentally sensitive area consisting generally of hills and stream valleys with many minor drainage areas. The town is located within two major drainage areas, Parkers Creek which drains to the Chesapeake Bay and Hunting Creek which drains to the Patuxent River. The later is an anadromous fish spawning stream. Parkers Creek has received considerable attention by conservation groups as well as by Maryland's Department of NaturalResources in relation to trying to preserve its pristine nature. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to map the potential location of wetlands of Hunting Creek where development has and is expected to be greatest and to begin to develop a Watershed Management Plan for Prince Frederick which would be consistent with the watershed management requirements of the Maryland Nontidal Wetland Program. The proposed Maryland Nontidal Wetland Regulations recommends development of Watershed Management Plans which must include the following elements: 1. A functional assessment on nontidal wetlands within the watershed; 2. The location of potential mitigation sites; 3. Protection of nontidal wetlands; 4. A plan for limiting cumulative impacts to nontidal wetlands; 5. Water supply management; and 6. Flood management. RESULTS PRELIMINARY WETLAND INVENTORY Data from the Soil Survey Maps for Calvert County have proven to be the most useful in estimating the extent of nontidal wetlands in Calvert County. The Soils Maps for Calvert County within the Hunting Creek Watershed have been entered into the County's Auto Cad computer mapping system and a map of potential waterways and wetlands has been produced from this data base which shows all of the streams (including the unclassified streams) and hydric soils for this watershed (see Map #1). It is our experience that a large number of the unclassified stream areas are nontidal wetlands. In those areas of the Town Center where the greatest impact of development is expected and where the wetland extent is in question, a gross wetland assessment was conducted by a wetland consultant. Letters for permission to access property to conduct the survey was sent to all property owners in the portion of Prince Frederick which drains into the Hunting Creek Watershed (see Appendix A.1 for a copy of the letter). Not all of the drainage area within the town center could be included in the assessment for the monies allotted, so priority was given to county sites where development is expected, sites adjacent to these parcels and only those sites for which permission to access was granted. The results for this study, including maps and dominant vegetative species, is included in a Preliminary Wetland Assessment Report prepared by McCarthy and Associates, Inc. (see Appendix B). PRELIMINARY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING EFFORTS The Environmental Planner consulted with private consultants and state and federal officials to determine the necessary information, work and expense that would be necessary to complete all aspects of the Watershed Management Plan for Prince Frederick. These meetings and associated correspondence are documented in the Coastal Zone Grant Quarterly Reports and in Appendix A.2. An interdepartmental meeting within Calvert County Government was also held to discuss development of the Plan and for recognition of pertinent issues (meeting agenda is included in Appendix A.3). From these discussions and the draft "Watershed Management Guidelines" an Outline was created for a watershed management plan for the Hunting Creek watershed (see Appendix A.4). This information was also used to produce a Coastal Zone Management Grant Request for fiscal year 1992. Among the final products proposed in this grant request was a draft watershed management plan for Prince Frederick. This request also included cost estimates for completing the work. (A copy of the grant I t I request is included in Appendix C.) Preparation of this document also satisfies one of the work products required of this grant which is to document the costs of preparing the watershed management plan. In addition, correspondence and meetings with representative from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Planning Division and DNR, WRA, Flood Management Division has resulted in potential additional funding (up to approximately $70,000) for flood management studies. The results of these studies will also be very useful in developing the stormwater management section of the watershed plan. SUMMARY The creation of the wetland maps and development of the Watershed Management Plan for Prince Frederick will allow our county to develop one of our major Town Centers in an environmentally sensitive manner and will prescribe in advance what would be required for development in the Town Center. The outline of the plan in itself could be used as a guide for other jurisdictions that are faced with developing such plans in light of the proposed Maryland Nontidal Wetland Program. It will also set the groundwork for continuing the Prince Frederick Watershed Plan. The work completed during this grant cycle has made it possible to submit a Coastal Zone Management grant request to produce a draft Watershed Management Plan which will be consistent with the guidelines set up by the Maryland Nontidal Wetland Program. In addition the completed computer mapping will serve as the base map from which additional natural resources overlays can be conducted and will be used in assessing the Hunting Creek watershed wetland types and functions in future studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Preparation of this report was partially funded by the Coastal Resources Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, through a grant provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 1. LETTER REQUESTING PERMISSION TO ACCESS PROPERTY IN PRINCE FREDERICK 2. LIST OF MEETING DATES, DESCRIPTIONS OF MEETINGS AND ASSOCIATED CORRESPONDENCE. 3. INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEETING ON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN - AGENDA 4. PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED - OUTLINE S. PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED - COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT GRANT PROPOSAL f It I I I I APPENDIX A I SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION I 1. LETTER REQUESTING PERMISSION TO ACCESS PROPERTY IN PRINCE .FREDERICK I I I .. I I I I I I I - I - I I I CALVERT COUNTY V'vr coo DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678 41. Phone (301) 535-1600 (DQ 855-1243 (301)535-2348 Director Board of Commissioners Frank A. lkliLh Patrick M. Buehler Mary M. Krug Hagner R. Mister Michael J. Moore Joyce Lyons Terhes. September 13, 1991 Dear Prince Frederick Town Center Property Owner, The Department of Planning and Zoning, Calvert County is beginning to conduct a watershed management plan for the Hunting Creek Watershed which includes the northern half of Prince Frederick. one of the initial steps is to inventory the wetlands in the Prince Frederick Town Center. The purpose of this letter is to let you know about the watershed plan and to request your permission for access onto your property for our environmental consultant to conduct a gross wetland delineation. We have limited funding through a Coastal Zone Management Grant to pay for a gross wetland delineation in portions of the Prince Frederick Town Center. We do not expect the funding will allow coverage of the entire north section of Prince Frederick, so, even though your property has received some priority, it may not be included in the area to be delineated. If you approve, the consultant will simply be walking your property in the areas of potential wetlands and will make notes on his maps. He will not leave any flagging or cut any vegetation. The result will be a map of approximate'wetland boundaries for some portions of the Prince Frederick Town Center. These maps will be made available to you. These maps could be used by you to guide any future development away from wetlands. If you propose future work in wetlands, such as a driveway or road crossing, a more accurate and detailed wetland delineation will be necessary. Planning and Zoning will be requesting and advertising for public participation in the development of the watershed plan. The purpose of the plan would be to allow development of the Prince Frederick Town Center in an environmentally sensitive manner including addressing environmental protection, wetland mitigation, cumulative impacts, flood management and water supply on a watershed scale. We look forward to your participation in the planning process. I t.I Attached is a consent form to allow our consultant access onto your property. Please, sign and date the form and return it to us immediately. We hope to complete the work in the next two weeks and priority will be given to those responses returned early. If we do not receive an affirmative response, your property will not be included in the wetland survey. Si ,@c )ely, David C. Brownlee, PhD. Environmental Planner I I I t I I I I APPENDIX A I SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 2. LIST OF MEETING DATES, DESCRIPTIONS OF MEETINGS AND I ASSOCIATED CORRESPONDENCE. I I I I I I I I I I I I LIST OF MEETING DATES, DESCRIPTIONS OF MEETINGS DATE ACTIVITY 10/15/90 MEETING WITH McKEWEN, DNR, NONTIDAL WETLAND DIVISION ON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING, ANNAPOLIS 12/18/90 PRELIMINARY MEETING WITH JESSIAN, HORN PT. ENVIRONM. LAB., UNIV. MD. ON M-WET MODEL FOR DETERMINING WETLAND FUNCTION, CAMBRIDGE 1/15/91 FOLLOW-UP MEETING WITH JESSIAN ON M-WET MODEL, AT PRINCE FREDERICK 1/24/91 MEETING WITH DNR, WRA, WATER RIGHTS DIVISION ON WATER SUPPLY AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING, ANNAPOLIS 1/30/91 MEETING WITH HUGHES, DNR, WRA, FLOOD MANAGEMENT DIV., ANNAPOLIS 4/16/91 ATTEND NONTIDAL WETLANDS PERMIT REVIEW WORKSHOP, ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ANNAPOLIS 4/17/91 PRESENT UPDATE ON GRANT PROGRESS AT THE COASTAL RESOURCES DIVISION PLANNERS WORKSHOP, ANNAPOLIS 5/2/91 MEETING WITH WATSON AND NEUNDORFER, MDE, WRA, DIVISION OF STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION, WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, BALTIMORE 5/15/91 MEETING WITH BEEGLE, ARMY CORP OF-ENGINEERS, PLANNING DIVISION, BALTIMORE 8/8/91 INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEETING ON PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, PRINCE FREDERICK 8/16/91 FOLLOW-UP MEETING WITH REBECCA HUGHES, DNR, WRA, FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND BEEGLE, ARMY CORP, ANNAPOLIS 9/9/91 MEET WITH McCARTHY, McCARTHY AND ASSOCIATES ON PRINCE FREDERICK WETLAND ASSESSMENT STUDY I It I I I I CORRESPONDENDCE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I of MA* NATU William Donaid Sch- fer Maryland Departm of Natund Resources Torrey C. Elsowi. M.D. Water Resources Administration Sammy Tawes State Office Building Catherine P. Stevenson Annapolis. Maryland 21401 February'5,, 1991 Dr. David Brownlee Calvert County Planning & Zoning Courthouse Annex 175 Main Street Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678 RE: Hunting Creek watershed Dear Dr - YM"_e'1_- it was a pleasure talking with you about your plans to work on atruly comprehensive plan for the Hunting Creek watershed. As Iindicated, Vat writinq to clarify the aspects in which this Division may be able to be involved. Floodnlain Studipa: The Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Hunting Creek and its tributaries depict.Approximate Floodplains for which detailed engineering has not been undertaken. For Many areas, appr xinate floodplains are adequate for guiding development away from these sensitive areas. However, as you proceed with your preliminary survey of needs, you may determine that additional hydrologic and hydraulic modelling and mapping is an important missing element. We should more carefully evaluate the need for additional study. This Division is authorized to fund or perform studies to delineate floodplains and to evaluate alternatives for addressing existing flood hazards. Although this is our primary objective when considering studies, we have determined thatprovidinq communities with more-accurate data and maps in order to improve local management of floodplain& is an acceptable adjunct. In the interest of assisting Calvert County in accomplishing a ampy-shensive study and plan,, I would be willing to add the Hunting Creek watershed to our priority study list. 0 Telephone: (301) 974-3825 Cilf DNR TTY for the Deaf: 301-974-3683 The county also has an active flood management program and the improved mapping would help in the Implementation of that program. The Calvert County Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan requires that the County attempt to provide sufficient water supply for potable water and fire protection. The watershed Management Plan would provide detailed information on these parameters in the watershed including Prince Frederick. V1. Supporting Grants As discussed above, the Flood Management Division, water Resources Administration, Department of Natural Resources is considering conducting hydrologic and hyraulic modeling and mapping in the Hunting Creek Watershed as a contribution toward the Hunting Creek watershed Management Plan Study (see attached letter from Ms. Hughes dated February 5, 1991). VII. Additional Information This project would be one of the first to use the watershed management provisions of Maryland's nontidal wetlands regulations. in-addition, Calvert County would be one of the first to use DNR's "A guide for Developing Nontidal Wetlands Watershed Management Plans In Maryland" In developing a watershed management plan. Thus, this project can serve as a prototype for other local governments to use In developing watershed management plans in their Jurisdictions. The watershed management approach shifts the focus of state and federal regulators from site specifics to a watershed based approach which allows cumulative Impacts to be addressed and makes more sense environmentally. Also, by establishing certain ground rules and Identifying mitigation sites in advance, projects in the watershed which meet the provisions of the plan can proceed more efficiently through the permitting process. S Mr. David Brownlee February 5, 1991 Paqe Two Nontidal Wetland-: In areas where we are already participatinq in floodplain studies, we can add an element to delineate nontidal wetlands. It may be possible to add identification of potential mitiqation sites to a scope of work. Sgurges Of Sediment: Similarly,, we can add an element to qualitatively identify and assess existinq sources of sediment- that may be adversely affectinq the stream system. This can help tarqet erosion and sediment control activities in watersheds experiencinq excessive streambank erosion and sedimentation. Tax Man Overlays': Recently.. we$ve not been producinq floodplain map overlays for local tax maps. We expect to utilize the MIPS system to prepare computerized overlays once the system- is fully implemented. I donOt know what the time line for this is, which is of course dependent.upon fundinq. There is a possibility that we could partially support the County's preparation of floodplain overlays if they are diqitized or comparably prepared to be compatible with your AUTOCAD/GIS. Despite the various opportunities for our participation, r cannot commit a specified amount of fundinq at this time. once the General Assembly has acted on our bond bill, we'll have a better idea of our possible participation. I look forward to hearinq from you as you more accurately define the scope of Your undertakinq. Sincerely, "-@Rebe@cca @Q.H@uqhes@,Chief Flood Manaqement Division ROH/cq Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tidewater Administration Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 William Donald Schaefer Torrey C. Brown, M.D. Governor Secretary March 28, 1991 David C. Brownlee Department of Planning and Zoning Calvert County Court House Prince Frederick, Maryland 20768 Dear Mr. Brownlee: This letter confirms that you will be giving a presentation titled, "Hunting Creek Watershed Management Plan: Getting Started", at the upcoming Local Government Coastal Zone Planners' Workshop on April 17, 1991, at the Holiday Inn in Annapolis. Your presentation should be about one half-hour long including time for questions. We anticipate around 60 people will be attending the workshop. You can expect to have 25-40 people attending your particular session. If you want everyone attending the workshop to have a copy of the material you bring; plan on bringing 60 copies. Otherwise, 40 copies should be sufficient. If it is more convenient for you, bring one copy of your material for review and those interested in it can sign the list to have it mailed to them. Audio visual equipment will be provided for your use. This will include a slide projector, overhead projector, easel, tape, pins, etc. Enclosed please find an agenda for the workshop. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me at 301-974-2784. Sin ere , Mi e Thomas Local Technical Assistance Program __44ere Encls. MT/jer Telephone: DNR TTY for Deaf: 301-974-3683 CALVERT COUNTY T co" DEPARTMENT OF PIANNING & ZONING Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678 &LISH99 Phone (301) 535-1600 (DC) 855-1243 (301) 535-2348 Director Board of Comnd=.oners Patrick M. Budder Frank A. Jakfitsch Mary M. Krug Raper R. Mister Michad J. Moore Joyce Lyons Terhes May 7, 1991 Mr. Noel Beegle, Chief Basin Planning Branch Planning Division U.S. Army Engineers District, Baltimore P.O. Box 1715 Baltimore, MD 21203-1715 (301) 962-3235 Dear Mr. Beegle, I would like to confirm our meeting to discuss the proposed "Prince Frederick Watershed Management Plan, Hunting Creek Watershed" scheduled for May 15, 1991 at 10:30 a.m. in your office in Baltimore. Enclosed are three copies of some background information on the project. The County objectives of our upcoming meeting are to determine the- Corps role in the proposed watershed management plan, to get some guidance in preparing watershed management plans, and to explore what technical and/or financial support the Corps might be able to offer in support of this project. Any guidance documents on watershed management planning, examples and references of such plans and/or sources of funding would be greatly appreciated. If you need any additional information, please let me know. I'm looking forward to meeting you next week. Y, David C. Brownlee, PhD. Environmental Planner C. Frank Jaklitsch, Director, Planning and zoning MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: June 25, 1991 MEMO TO: Board of COuntY Commissioners VIA: Dick Holler County Administrator VIA: Frank Jaklitsch, Directore Department of Pla ng a Zo in MEMO FROM: David Brownlee Environmental Planner RE: Watershed Management Plan for Prince Frederick, requests to the State and Army Corps for technical support. 1. BACKGROUND The County has applied for grant monies through the Coastal Zone Management Program to develop a watershed management plan for the Hunting Creek Watershed which includes a substantial portion of Prince Frederick. The proposal will be funded if it receives favorable action by NOAA (see attached letter from Dr. Lima to the Calvert County Board of County Commissioners). Flood management is one of the objectives of the watershed management plan. Both the Army Corp of Engineers and Maryland DNR, Water Resources Administration have indicated that they would be willing to entertain request for technical support for flood management. II. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS I have prepared (enclosed) draft letters requesting support for flood management to both the Corps and DNR from the Board of County Commissioners. If both were to provide support for the project, their technical studies and assistance might be valued at somewhere between $50,000 and $100,000. The results of their studies could also be used in evaluating future stormwater management requirements for Prince Frederick. The details of the support to be provided and the detailed work approach of the watershed management plan will be developed through interdepartmental coordination with Planning and Zoning, Economic Development, Engineering, Public Facilities ' Directo Zang_a and Services and Public Safety. III. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend that you modify if necessary and send the attached letters requesting support to the Army Corps and DNR. IV. COORDINATION Economic Development Taima4j-e Reeves Date Engineering Bob Taylor Date Public Facilities and Services @L 091 ohn Berg n Date Public Safety 6) G. Bob Short Date C. Bill Bailey John Bergin Dennis Brobst Bob Short Talmage Reeves e arg CALVERT COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Courthouse Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678 "LIS HF Phone (301) 535-16W, (DC) 855-1243 Board of Commissioners Patrick M. Buehler Mary M. Krug Hagner R. Mistcr Michael J. Moore Joyce Lyons Terhes July 2, 1991 Mr. James Johnson, Chief Planning Division U.S. Army Engineers District, Baltimore P.O. Box 1715 Baltimore, MD 21203-1715 Dear Mr. Johnson, The Calvert County Board of County Commissioners is requesting your division's technical assistance under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, Section 206, Flood Control Act of 1960. Your assistance, if available, would be used in the development of a Watershed Management Plan for the Hunting Creek Watershed (outline enclosed). The Hunting Creek Watershed is the largest watershed in Calvert County and includes a major portion of the largest town in the County, Prince Frederick. The main objective of the Plan is to facilitate development in our designated town centers in an environmentally sensitive manner using a watershed approach. The County's Environmental Planner, Dr. David Brownlee, met with Mr. Noel Beegle, Chief, Basin Planning Branch of your division on May 15, 1991 to discuss the possible Army Corps involvement in this watershed management plan. Mr. Beegle encouraged Dr. Brownlee to have a letter of request submitted. Calvert County has applied to the Maryland coastal Zone Management Program administered by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division (CRD) for grant monies to develop a watershed management plan for the Hunting Creek watershed (proposal enclosed). We have received a letter of intent to fund from CRD (letter from Dr. Jacob Lima enclosed) though the final contract will not be signed until August and monies are not absolutely committed until that time. our request to you is for technical services under the flood management section of the watershed management plan (section III.C. of the Outline). We are asking for your assistance in conducting hydrologic and hydraulic studies to better define the flood plain in the watershed, especially in the area of Prince Frederick and identified problem areas. The results of these proposed studies would also provide invaluable data for modeling stormwater management. We are also requesting that you assess the possible imoacts on the flood plain of expected changes in land use. In adaition, we are requesting that a flood damage reduction study be conducted for the wat-ershed. Dr. Brownlee hds also been discussing the Hunting Craek Watershed Management Plan and flood management assistance with Ms. Rebecca Hughes, Chief, Flood Management Division, Water Resources Administration, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Her division may also be able to provide assistance (see attached lette-.- from Ms. Hughes, 2-5-91, and our letter to her, 6-25-91). If assistance becomes available from both DNR and your agency, then we would ask Dr. Brownlee to coordinate the assistance to maximize coverage of the watershed, to maximize use of resources and to avoid duplication. We would greatly appreciate your consideration of our request. If our request is granted we would hope that the work could be done concurrent with the Coastal Zone grant which would begin in October., 1991. Dr. Brownlee will be our contact person for this projent and we -request -hat ycu submit any questions concerning the det;_@_;!s Qf the projeCt to him (DepartiaeDt Of Planning and Zoningl 176 Main Street, Prince Frederick, MD 20678; (301) 535-2348). SinFerely, Mary M. Krug, Presiden Calvert County Bo-@Ard of County Commissioners C. Mr. Noel Beegle, Division of Planning, Army Corps Dr. David Brownlee, Department of Planning and Zoning Ms. Rebecca Hughes, Water Resources Administration, DNR Mr. Frank Jaklitsch, Department of Planning and Zoning Ms. Sherrod Sturrock, Department of Administration and Finance CALVERT COUNTY VC, co BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSIONERS Courthouse Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678 Phone (301) 535-1600, (DC) 855-1243 Board of Commsmoners Patrick M. Buckler Mary M. Krug Haguer R. Mister Michad J. Moore July 2, 1991 Joyce Lyons Terhes Ms. Rebecca Q. Hughes, Chief Flood Management Division Water Resources Administration Maryland Department of Natural Resources Dear Ms. Hughes, The Calvert County Board of County Commissioners is requesting your division's technical assistance in flood plain management services. Your assistance, if available, would be used in the development of a Watershed Management Plan for the Hunting Creek Watershed (outline enclosed). The Hunting Creek Watershed is the largest watershed in Calvert County and includes a major portion of the largest town in the County, Prince Frederick. The main objective of the Plan is to facilitate development in our designated town centers in an environmentally sensitive manner using a watershed approach. The County's Environmental Planner, Dr. David Brownlee, met with you and Mr. John Joyce on January 30, 1991 to discuss the possible Water Resources Administration involvement in this watershed management plan. You kindly responded with a letter (February 5, 1991) indicating the type of services your division might offer and indicating your potential involvement. In this letter we would like to make a formal request for your divisions services. Calvert County has applied to the Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program administered by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division (CRD) for grant monies to develop a watershed management plan for the Hunting Creek watershed (proposal enclosed). We have received a letter of intent to fund from CRD (letter from Dr. Jacob Lima enclosed) though the final contract will not be signed until August and monies are not absolutely committed until that time. Our request to you is for technical services under the flood management section of the watershed management plan (section III.C. of the Outline). We are asking for your assistance in conducting hydrologic and hydraulic studies to better define the flood plain in the watershed, especially in the area of Prince Frederick and identified problem areas. The results of these proposed studies would also provide invaluable data for modeling stormwater management (section III -D of Outline). We also are requesting your assistance in delineating nontidal wetlands in and around the town centers and in locating appropriate mitigation sites (sections III.B.1 and III.E.3 of the Outline). In addition, we are requesting your assistance in identifying sediment pollution problem areas (section III.E.5 of the Outline). And finally, we would appreciate any assistance you can provide in the preparation of Tax Map overlays (section III.F.1 of the Outline). Dr. Brownlee has also been discussing the Hunting Creek Watershed Management Plan and flood management assistance with Mr. Noel Beegle, Chief, Basin Planning Branch, Planning Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (see attached letter to Mr. Beegle's supervisor, Mr. James Johnson, Chief, Planning Division). The Planning Division of the Corps may also be able to provide assistance under Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960. If assistance becomes available from both the Corps and your agency, then we would ask Dr. Brownlee to coordinate the assistance to maximize coverage of the watershed, to maximize use of resources and to avoid duplication. We would greatly appreciate your consideration of our request. if our request is granted we would hope that the work could be done concurrent with the Coastal Zone grant which if approved would begin i.n October, 1991. Dr. Brownlee will be our contact person for this project and we request that you submit any questions concerning the details of the project to him (Department of Planning and Zoning, 176 main Street, Prince Frederick, MD 20678; (301) 535-2348). i-1:11cerely, Mary M. Kru President Calvert Co' ty Board of County Commissioners C. Mr. Noel Beegle, Division of Planning, Army Corps Dr. David Brownleef Department of Planning and Zoning Mr. Frank Jaklitsch, Department of Planning and Zoning Mr. James Johnson, Division of Planning, Army Corps Ms. sherrod S4--urrockp Department of Administration and Finance Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tidewater Administration ' Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis. Maryland 21401 William Donald Schaefer Torrey C. Brown, M.D. Governor Secretarv May 29, 1991 M's. Mary M. Krug, President Calvert County Board of Commissioners Court House Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678 Dear M's. Krug: The Coastal Resources Division (CRD) has evaluated and competitively ranked the projects submitted by the Coastal Zone local governments for funding through Section 306 of the Coastal Zone Management Act. Based upon this evaluation, CRD has submitted a grant application to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) which included the following allocation of funding for your jurisdiction: Standard CZM Activities Federal Funding $10,000 Local Match $ 0 Watershed Management Federal Funding $20,600 Plan Local Match $18,708 Due to the number of grant requests received, funding may not have been allocated for all of the projects you requested or at the level requestedA. Subject to favorable action by NOAA, the funds will be available October 1, 1991. CRD staff will be getting in touch with your staff to discuss the development of a contractual agreement for this project (s) . In order to provide you with a fully executed contract by October 1, 1991, we will be working under the following schedule: June 1991 .............. negotiate final Scopes of Work Telephone: DNR TTY for Deaf: 301-974-3683 M's. Mary Krug May 29, 1991 Page Two July 1, 1991 - August 14, 1991 ........ local government review August 15, 1991 - and approval of contract September 30, 1991 ..... state review and approval of contract If you have any questions concerning your grant request, please call Gwynne Schultz at 301-974-2784. Sincerely, Jacob N. Lima, Ph.D. Director Coastal Resources Division cc:/David Brownlee Gwynne Schultz 4;; ilvw" Ii@ j,@ I I I I APPENDIX A I SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 3. INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEETING ON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN - I AGENDA I I I I I I I I I I I I MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: August 8, 1991 MEMO TO: Dick Holler, County Administrator John Bergin, Public Facilities and Services Linwood Beverly Greg Bowen, Water and Sewerage Dennis Brobst, Water and Sewerage Ron Clark, Engineering Roxana Homer, Planning and Zoning Talmage Reeves, Economic Development Bob Short, Public Safety and Services Bob Taylor, Engineering Randi Vogt, Planning and Zoning MEMO FROM: David Brownlee and Frank Jaklitsch RE: PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED Attached is an agenda and documentation concerning the "Prince Frederick Watershed Management Plan, Hunting Creek Watershed" scheduled for 1:00 today. Please, review the agenda and documents before the meeting if at all possible. Come with lots of questions and good ideas. AGENDA PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED AUGUST 8, 1991 1:00 P.M. Rm. 10, COURTHOUSE ANNEX 1. PURPOSE OF MEETING 2. PURPOSE OF PLAN 3. PROGRESS TO DATE A. CZM PROJECT 1990-1991 B. CZM PROPOSAL 1991-1992 4. OUTLINE OF PLAN A. REVIEW OUTLINE AND IDENTIFY PARTIES INVOLVED IN EACH SECTION B. IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL ISSUES - REVISE OUTLINE AS NECESSARY C. IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES TO ASSIST MEETING COUNTY GOALS 5. FLOOD MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE FROM DNR AND THE STATE A. IDENTIFY PRIORITY AREAS FOR STUDIES B. COUNTY INVOLVEMENT IN STUDIES 6. INTERDEPARTMENTAL PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN 7. SUMMARY AND PLAN OF ACTION -11 111 I I I APPENDIX A I SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 1 4. PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED - OUTLINE I I I I I I I I I I I I I HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN OUTLINE DAVID BROWNLEE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 176 MAIN STREET PRINCE FREDERICK, MD 20678 I. INTRODUCTION A. Status B. Need for Watershed Management Plan 1. County Comprehensive Plan 2. Prince Frederick development and wetland permits 3. Address wetland loss, mitigation and protection comprehensively II. HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED A. Size (29 sq. mi.) and Location B. Extent of Wetlands C. Land Use III. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN A. Identify Goals of Plan and Issues 1. Protect natural resources 2. Facilitate development in town centers 3. Address wetland loss and mitigation on a watershed scale 4. Assure public health and safety B. Identify Natural Resources 1. Wetlands by type and aerial extent 2. Flood plains 3. Water supply 4. Forest cover 5. Habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species C. Determine Wetland Function 1. M-WET model 2. Other appropriate models and approaches D. Wetland Protection 1. Wetland buffers 2. Habitat areas of special Federal, State and Local concern 3. open space purchase 4. Limit development in 100 yr. flood plain 5. Stormwater Management 6. Review of County Plans and ordinances E. Cumulative Impact Assessment 1. Stream monitoring 2. Wetland loss 3. Nutrient loading 4. Review by state and federal agencies F. Flood Plain Management 1. Review and update flood plain maps 2. Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling 3. Identify flood problem areas and plan corrections 4. Limit development in flood plain G. Water Supply 1. Determine water supply and demand - present and future 2. Develop well-head protection plan 3. Identify water supply or quality problems and plan corrections IV. GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION A. Federal 1. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers 2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 5. National Marine Fisheries Service 6. Soil Conservation Service B. State 1. DNR-WRA-Nontidal Wetlands Division 2. DNR-WRA-Flood Management Division 3. DNR-WRA-Water Rights Division 4. DNR-TA-Coastal Resources Division 5. DNR-Forest, Park and Wildlife Service 6. MDE-Water Quality Certification 7. MDE-Sediment and Stormwater Management 8. Critical Area Commission C. Regional and Local 1. Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland 2. Dept. of Engineering 3. Dept. of Public Facilities and Services 4. Dept. of Public Safety 5. Dept. of Economic Development 6. General public and organized citizen associations and citizen advisory groups V. SUMMARY APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 5. PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED - COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT GRANT PROPOSAL -, I I I I APPENDIX B I PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT REPORT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I McCARTHY & ASSOCIATES, INC. REGULATORY and ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Preliminary Wetland Assessment For Portions of the Hunting Creek Watershed Prince Fredrick Town Center Calvert County, Maryland Prepared By: Mccarthy and Associates, Inc. October, 1991 14458 Old Mill Road #201 Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 (301) 627-7505 Tr PURPOSE AND INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Hunting Creek Watershed wetland assessment is to provide Calvert County planners with a rough approximation of the extent and location of jurisdiction of non-tidal wetlands, on various properties, within the town center. This assessment: is not intended to replace actual field delineation and surveyed locations. An actual delineation would require the field implementation of the 1987 Corps Manual. This methodology requires that three parameters be satisfied in order for an area to be classified as a jurisdictional wetland. The three parameters include the presence of wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and a dominance, 50% or greater, coverage of hydrophytic vegetation. In making this approximation, the three parameter system was applied in a general form to the various more questionable areas at a number of locations along stream margins and swale bottoms. Soils were sampled and compared to the Munsell Color Chart. Munsell colors of two chroma or 1 chroma with mottles are considered hydric. Vegetation was identified and placed into either tree, sapling/shrubs, herbaceous, and woody vine categories. The three most dominant species in each category have been recorded on the enclosed data sheets with their appropriate indicator status. Obvious signs of hydrology were noted, as well. If all three parameters are deemed to be present, then the area in question would be considered wetland. Contiguous wetland areas have been drawn, to the best of the field evaluator's ability, on a topographic map corresponding to the portions of land being evaluated. The properties evaluated were: Property Owner County Comm. of Calvert County, P. 549 Board of Education, P. 4 John William, Jr., P. 566 and P. 5 County Comm. of Calvert County, P. 511 and Section "A" and "B" Gott Realty C., Inc., P. 15 Calvert Village LTD Partnership, P. 236 Calvert Association for Retarded Citizens, P. 66 A copy of the tax map corresponding to the properties is included in Appendix B, along with access consent forms for properties not owned by Calvert County. Calvert County Tax Map Number 24, indicating the properties evaluated, was overlain on a corresponding topographic map. Property lines are approximation based on limited information and will likely vary in reality. For the purposes of the study the lines should be sufficient. The maps were taken into the field and used to locate position and show point corresponding to data sheets. Maps and data sheets are enclosed in Appendix A. The data sheets document the finding at each location and reasons for the determination made. Vegetation is broken into four categories: Trees, sapling/shrub, herbaceous, and woody vines. Within these categories the three most dominant species are listed by scientific name. Besides each of the species identified, the indicator status is listed. The indicator status is listed in Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur In Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). U.S. Fish and Wildlife service Biol. Rep. 88 (26.1). 111 pp. This publication cites species tolerance to anaerobic soil conditions found in wetlands. The classification hierarchy is iesigned to predict the chance of finding a particular species in a wetland. Indicator categories cited in the plant list are: Indicator Categories obligate Wetland (OBL). Occur most always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACW). Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67%-99%), but occasionally found in non wetlands. Facultative (PAC). Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non wetlands (estimated probability 30-66%). Facultative Upland (FACU). Usually occur in non wetlands (estimated probability 67%-99%), but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability A-33%). obligate Upland (UPL).. Occur in wetlands in another region, but occur almost always (estimated probability > 99%) under natural conditions in non wetlands in the region specified. If a species does not occur in wetlands in any region, it is not listed on the National List. Under the 1987 Corps Manual (FAC-) or dryer indicators are not considered to be typically adapted to anaerobic soil conditions. Areas need to have 50% or greater dominance of FAC, FACW, and\or OBL species to be considered wetland. Soil evaluations were made using a 2 1/2 inch bucket auger and extracting a sample to 12 inches in depth. The soils were evaluated for color and mottling, as well as other indicators of saturation. Color determinations were made by comparison to the Munsell Color Chart and findings were recorded on the data sheets. A copy of the county soil map has been included in Appendix A. The maps show the overall rough determinations based on the data gathered in the field. Red areas indicate jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the United States. Yellow areas depict more questionable wetland calls. These areas would knowingly require more field time and a jurisdictional determination by the appropriate agencies. CONCLUSIONS For the most part, the data sheets and maps conclude the findings as they were found in the field. It should be noted that during an actual delineation a mere comprehensive vegetative analysis would be done, and a greater number of soil samples are taken when defining the wetland/upland boundary. This analysis was an overview and much less time was spent at each location. The question was raised, prior to the evaluation, as to the changes in the manuals used to identify and delineate non- tidal wetlands. The 1989 Federal Manual is no longer being used by the Army Corps of Engineers. In its place, the 1987 Corps Manual is now being implemented. A 1991 manual is being reviewed, though its future implementation is unknown at this time. It was determined that in order to make a general determination on the site, the differences between manuals was not a major issue. The evaluation, though, was directed by the 1987 Corps Manual methodology as there needed to be a set of criterion for making a determination. The inherent inaccuracies of a hand drawn line is overriding differences between manuals in most places. References: National List of Plant Species That Occur In Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, May 1988 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Preparation of this report was partially funded by the Coastal Resources Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, through a grant provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1@1 1;1 I I. I , I I I I I I I APPENDIX A I I I I I I I I I I 0A_ SILPAIRWAN IT61406 CRAXL4% Wf0tol st.00A. M& ,.to 44136t. -_j sm a. sow .9&X ts np= 40cl" 04 ov 'MA" lk a JXL jamwl V@gw An MI 436 "if AL pmiwr^WwAbm 44C GO.Mm. aw dr-M ,t,w aq AW JftfAP SW 4*WW ow za AUMr/- 01.16AL oww tv 41%46% 60011* )ob.0 A. -io S10A, T. %,.A IS" P.344 4 KTAL Lc =110"2.0 I AOE12"]., 7,40*. P. 5(.(. jqa@ 14 ALONE& C.Tom" I LT .1.1.2 @ I AAH Mgt 00 $as* Aggismaso Zvo 04.444. tp P.m$ 3.W.W i i,-^ , all* P346 CdLLV ".We ik" 0. t7 rza ar Palo Ah I ("i tu.a*4L 0 L_: 06.%lt%0 54: vs A, aw P.440 IlA. FUCA rAw 4vrr 49v P. 14 .4'rom A JV.OVA Alw Oro Wippm Affma f W44A. P". 44 ac SAC, ofts 04 jr1f ---------------- ASI MUSES It pop C A44 11 11 41 COC ft4 wasiL. cm Allashylool 4208A. 4 W.111,46 "low W;Cvl dMAW P.w4 COURST COMM GFCALVINT COVOTT lellf its. Mal" Ann 4/400 8-11 lo.toa. P. CIOARLall 16-41414 to - P.100 A1111141/136 JAAIC& L 90OF1101 .3 11014" P. ROJO, Jim RON, as acomm -Ir =711" AMOCO. of SOA. 9 I" 204 FiL 164 R'64 .96 00 AN PUMP AWJVV 4 joamerAw At s 4R M, ^V go" pull M^w A. 40M vgmvw 341 An salialls 4&11 A. 34 1 PETS, Awl P-1111 0411F jdo%vff v,^.. Rjw Am. "APSA-9.4 IF am PAW PWO Jaw go 4. 14.311A. 0 1 1 _%, MAV J, *ONE" MAI, J.. Vote INIJ60 I Age Siena, A99310/123 ot.C.IA6 I 110A. V. &wv zo@ W. WILL" a. 31. CUIPIRT CTL . Gamoltz, I'm ;FLM 81/110 30 JL4 109 ISIS 10-reigaim if 164,011 MLQCrAIC .. P"O .620 U43 893/4 P.11 Civ.0"O P.4 4 2.0.. W A A992SInSt 114.64A. re, 21 p %@AUVIKIP IftVIAll 0 P-"l "I&" jv A" *11, 90"w. :c Pool .W.0 w S.00A. PAN- IAAF .000' PAR A 4rw 6.9811. A it. )p , '. two guzmtvm A. WILSON US JLO 01191 wit 94.16A. A&FID 0 ; rp-.m .9 FAV, &VIP 9v. 6 Coww" CAL.LMT I"OPMN Op"40110 MICRO W-9 CALVII14'roco. A192131104 gualsor M.44A. 44 VGA. ec:r) A Sit 046141 PA'r .......... ....... All lawcolcaldw../ A61543/429i 1.50A for-#" as p Ito PIAV r 1, " 4. - ArdwA*Wp 10 AN d.^"f ell C \. ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Number: Name: State: _County: ~6qC~L~qJ~1~J~9~L~f~q+~qLeg~al Description: Township: Range:_ Date: Plot No.: Section: Veget~at~qi~ol~l [list t~qhe three ~qdo~m~qi~n~a~l~it species in e~ac~ql~i vegetation layer (5 if ~On~qL~qy I or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with nit asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species stat~t~qi~s Trees Herbs ~0qA~6qx ~r~qm~e~2q4~0qk~a~, ~8q(~qF~qAC~.) 7. ~l~8qp 2~. A .I. ~q9~. ~a~qpl~qi~ng~s/~s~qhru~qbs Woody vines 4. ~2qP ~2qL~6q) ~q5~. n. ~4qV~1~1~q4~q" I 6 . ~8qX ~-~,~r~- at, 12. ~8qF~2qA~qk~*~'A~8q0~r~-~q; ~S~qj~'~-~-~qS ~q% of species that, nr~e 0~q1~2q%, FA~qCW, and/or FA~qC~: ~0 Other indicators: ~8q2~6qQ~,~8qZ ~qf~qlydrophyticvegetatio~n: Yes-No Bn~s~ql~s.~-~qk)~,~:~-~q@ ~:6 Soil Series ~an~qd phase: Ott hydric soils list? Yes_; N~O~-~6qZ~q,~. Mottled: Yes No Mottle color: Matrix color: ~2qL~b ~0qY~4q&~-~qq~4qz~4qv ~qGleyed: Yes ~qN~o~-~-~8qA~q- Other indicators: ~q1~1ydr.~q1c soils: Yes- No. Basis~: > ~ql~qlydr~o~ql~og~,~qy ~qI~t~iund~ated: Ye~a ~qNo Depth of ~stn~t~id~qi~n~qg wnter~- ~1~q1~qg~q4 Saturated soils: Yes_; No__~,~q?~q@_. Depth to saturated soil: ~#~q1~a~q4~- Other Indicators: ~qV1 ~qe~q) A ~q& Wet~2qi~qa~qnd hydrology: Yes_; No Basis: ~qr~-~q.~qf Atypical ~qs~2qituati~qon~qt Yes No Normal Circumstances? Yes X~q, No Wetl~qand Determination: Wet~4qland~q. No~qnweL~4ql~qa~qnd Comments~q: Determined by: ~56qA~24qL ~8qg~44qw~- B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAN~qD DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project ~qba~m'e:~qg~0qf "I v, Number: Name* ~o~u~n ~Ity: ~0qC _ ~q" I State: ~~4qt~4q=~4qt~qV~,~.~0q+Leg~al Description: T~ownship~:_R~an~qge: ~qu~s ~qt~qe~: ~0q5~e~-~qp . 1 ~-7 not No. ~4q2 Section: Vegetation [list t~qhe three d~om~qi~n~auL species i~n e~n~ch vegetation layer (~q5 if only I or 2 layers)). ~qI~t~id~qi~c~ate species with observed m~orpho~qi~og~qic~al or known physiological adaptations with ~a~n asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Statu's Trees Herbs ~q(F~6qA~,~-~qw~q) 7. 2~.~qF-~4qO~L~-~s 3. ~0qL~@ ~q5 - ~q@~c~Ar ~f~q4~,~y eat ~<~i ~1~4~.~" ~4q(~6qF ~qA~,~8qC~4q) 9. 4 Sa~qp~qli~n~qgs/~n~qI~trubs Woody vines ~L~4qi ~q1~q0. 5 ~8qr~8q4~c~- ~0qO~rA~e~-) 12. ~qZ of species that are ~qOB~qL~, FACW, and/or FAC~.~,_~q!~2q1~0q0~4q@ Other ind~ql~c~ator~s~*~qC~-~q4~,~a~,~,~.~Q_~qJ~- Hydr~ophytic vegetation: Yes ~2qX No Basis: Soil Series and phase- b~0qA O~n hydric soils list? Yes No__- Mottled: Yes. ~q>~qe, ; No Mottle color: I Oy~qq ~@4~2q/~e~, ; Matrix color: ~0qT~4qY~q611 ~qGleyed: Yes ~q-~q>~C No Other indicators: ~2q0~,~K~,~.~8qQ~2q" ~2~-~-~4qk ~qr~- ~q@~,, -7~. ~qHydric soils: Ye~a No Basis: ~6qg~k~-~q@~, ~q1~6q9~q- ~CQ ~QJ~-~A~,~2~!~@ me ~q@~-~qt~qb ~-~1 Hydrology Inundated: Yes No_. Depth of standing water: ~q@~qJ~o Saturated soils: Ye~s-~q2~2q< No Depth to saturated soil: Other Indicators: A ~qt W~qet~0qi~qa~qnd hydrology: Yes ~0q>~q<~q, ; No Basis: ~6q&~0q4~q-~qr~q,~q;~qp Atypical situation: Yes ; N~qo__~q@~36qK_. Normal C~0qircumst~qances7 Yes ~36qK No Wetland Determination: Wetl~qand N~qonweL~4ql~qand Comments: Determined by! B2 ~0 ~qDA~qXA FORM I WETLAN~qD DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Name ~V a/ ~8qC~-~0 ~qJ,~@~8q@ Number: Name. ~4qP~-~1~c~. ~d~qJ State: ~o~u~nty: Legal Description: Towns hip:_~qR~a~nge:_ ~qVat~q#:~-~.~q5~&~q,~, 1 7, ~qI~I~qI~-~'~qi~qj~q- Plot No. Section: Ve~qaetat [list t~qhe three dominant species i~n e~nch vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with ~s~i~t asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species -Statu's Trees Herbs ~qI~.~6qL~%~C~qb~v~.~q: 7.~0qP Pei ~ql~4qy ~i ~c-~qL~,~% ~4~-~q"~4~6qA~q/~r~-~q@~1~q0~q;~6qS~6qz~y (FA~q& ~q@~A) 3. ~qF~-A 9. S~ap~qli~ngs/shru~qb~s Woody vines to. 5. As; ~A~,~,~.~,~-~k ~q1~q1. 6. ~qL~.~,~., 12. ~qZ of species t~qhat are ~qUB~qL, FA~qCW, and/or FA~qC~t~.~q4~,~qE~4qg Other indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation, Yes No Basis: T~4qk~,~,~s ~1~q5 L Soil Series a~nd phase: ~qS ~r ~qF~- O~n hydric soils list? Yes_; No X Mottled: Ye~a No X Mottle color: Matrix color: ~q1~q0~qy~qg 4~6q/~&~qJ. ~qGleyed: Yes No Other indicators: ~ql~lydr.i~c s~o~qil~s~t Yes~q- No. ~q>~q< ~q; Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Ye~a N~o__~0qX_. Depth of ~9~0q0nd~qi~ng wnt~er~- n~e~i Saturated soils: Yes_; No__~.~*~q@_~. Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: I ~qr ~8q@~q,~qO~8qj ~q4 ~0qA~q!~0qJ ~q0 Wet~6ql~qand hydrology: Ye~qs ; No__~4q@~32q@. Basis: Atypical situation: Yes ; No__~q,~4q@~0qC Normal Circumstances? Yes ~4q>~4q< No Wetl~qand Determination: Wetla~qn~8qd No~qnwetland I look Comments~q: ~4qT~60qi~2qv~8qs ~qC it I ~qd~q- ~q1~q, Determined by- ~16q/~q-~80qt~ql~qo~ql ~q'~q0~96q1~q, 1~2q12 ~0 DATA FORM I W~qETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project I ~2qr~2qq ~2q9 Number: Name: ~, State: County,_ Legal Description: Town~ship~:_R~ange: ~qDate~,~-~q5~"~,~-~,~g~, 1~q8~, 1 ~qq~d~o~q@ I Plot No.: Section: Vegetation [list t~qhe three dominant species i~n each vegetation layer (~q5 if only I or 2 layers~q)~q]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known phy~s~ql~o logical adaptations with ~s~i~t asterisk. I~t~id~qic~ator Indicator Species Status Species Status Trees Herbs 7. ~qC~-~; ~C~2qJ~q) 2. LAI-,&,$ 3. 9~- ~9~qk 4~- ~qh~v I ILA,, S~a~qpl~qings/shrubs Woody vines 10~- ~q1~q1. 1~7~4qA ~qC~q-~t~A~. ~qI~@ A ~r- ~j - 12. ~q4~qt~%~,~- a ~c- ~q% of species t~qhat are OBL, FA~qCW, and/or FAC~qk~2q= Other indicators., ~qHydr~ophyt~qic vegetation: Yes ~q- No Basis; low /I 4~4~, Soil Series a~nd phase: Ott hydric soils list? Yes_; No ~8qX . Mottled: Yes. ~q>~q( ; No Mottle color: ~rL.~, Matrix color:~2q2.~qS~8qy ~qG~qleyed: Yes No Other indicators: ~qI~qlyd~nic soils: Yes ~q>~q( No Basis: Hydrology In~t~i~n~t~qinted~: Ye~s~q-~q-~q>~6qC~q; No Depth of ~at~t~ind~qi~n~qg water: A~8A Saturated soils: Ye~a~q-~4qx~q-~q; No. Depth to saturated soil: I Other Indicators: Wet~0qla~qnd hydrology: Yes ~8q)~qw\; No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes No_~q!~52qK_~q. Normal C~2qircumst~qa~qt~qices7 Yes No Wetl~qand Determination: Wetl~qind Nonwet~4ql~qa~qnd Comments., ~6q7~4qt~2q, ~4q; ~qJ~q.~8q'~qr ~0q5 lly ~qi~qT I-/ I ~0q>~q@ I Determined by., ~qt~q. ~6q6~4qt~84qa~qw~q- B2 ~0 DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Name: ~2qC~-~V~L~^~,~n Number: Name: ~q5~-~8qq ~q9 State: T~q) ounty~:~qe~-~-~e_~qJ~qu~,~,~,~,~,~q@ Legal Description: Township:_Range:_ Da t~e: ~-~0qS~e~:p I a, I ~4qg ~0~q@ I Plot No.: ~q4 Section: Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species -Statuis Trees Herbs I. ~qL~-~q;~q8 ~S~q+~y ~q(FA~c~.) 7. P ~6qr~o ~n 4~oL~o~, 2. ~qP~q1~6~%~q@~0~,~A~%~&~S ~0~C~C~.~,~,~C~J~q(~q2~,~W 8. ~qJ~q) ~qS (~rA~r~- ~t~qj ~:~@~- ~q" ~q(~qFA~IA~,~)) 9.13~.~ae~qAA~,~-~@~1~V~r~q;~0~L Saplings/shrub~s Woody vines 4.L~;~.~,~q;~qL~q~.~.~e~a~, ~qt~o~o-~m~-~L~o~q'~-~) ~0q(~qFA~C~-~1~-~J) 10. T~4 ~x~'~l ~c~@ ~o ~-~i (F~8qA~C 5. , ~,~% ~q(r~8qA~c~@~qL~A~q@ ~q1~q1.L~o~n~l~,~@~q~-~r~q /~' ~1~-~1~0q/ ~F~qF~6qA ~6qC~8qJ 6. ~4qC~.~q"~, ~l~qp ~)~~1~) ~@~, I ~e~-~w~, ~@ ~0 ~q@~q; ~, ~e~. ~0~, ~n~,~q@ 12. ~qS~qm~8qd, % of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or ~qFAC:_~2qL~qg~'~q@~2qy ~. Other indicators: ~qHydrophytic vegetation: Yes ~qV~6q" No Basis: Soil Series and phase:~4qM~,~,~qk~6qa ~8 ~0 ~,~qj~@ ~qJ~.~,~6qk On hydric soils list? Ye N Mottled: Yes, No Mottle color:~ql~t~o~qy~P~1~q3 ~q@/~qt ; Matrix color:~q1~8q0 4~0qA~. Gleyed: Yes ~qV~e~' No other indicators: Hyd~ric soils: Yes ~qJ~.#~,~' N~o_~q; Basis: ~o ~qk~,~- a ~A~o~% ~0, ~1~,~4 ~a~L ~0qJ~jr ~y~.~, Hydrology Inundated: Yes ~V~-~1 ~, No Depth ~o anding water: Saturated soils: Yes No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: Wetl~qand hydrology: Yes ~qk~q,~q-~8q@~0q; No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes No Normal Circumstances? Yes No Wetland Determination: Wetland ~qr~q-~q-~q*~q, Nonwetland Comments: Determined b~6qy~q:~q.~40qA~q. ~40q4~8q!~64qp~q, B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Name: ~q(~*~,~O~k ~q(~L~,~.~r~q4 ~0qC~-~V~,~, Number: Name: ~2qP~,~,~r~e~-~-~e I State: ~q)~@~-~qkD ounty: ~qC~-~.~tJ~L~,~,~,~q@ Legal Description: Township~:_Range~:_ Date~f:~.~q@~6q*~, ) Plot No.: ~2qq ~O~L Section: Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Statu's Trees Herbs 7. 2. 8~- ~C~) ~Q,~1 ~-~S S ~qF ~2qA~C~q-~q) 3. 9. A ~^~1 ~q(~qI~=A~e- Saplings/shrub~s Woody vines ~4qN/A 4. ~c- I A ~q@~q;~:4~c~-~q) 10~. 5. L ~1~,~, ~1) ( F A ~e~-~-~,~-~) ) ~q1~q1. 6. F A 12. ~qZ of species that are ~OBL, FACW, and/or FAC~.~*~4q)~1~8q0~2q@~,~4q/~qOther indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes ~po' No Basis*- Soil Series and phase: ~-~'~q@x~qk~s~1~2qT~e~r~,~q6 ~0q@~8q"~,~2qW~6qW~6qQn hydric soils list? Yes_; No ~r`~o~o~q@~. Mottled: Yes. No Mottle color: ~r~L-~q~q@ Matrix color: ~q6 ~0q/~qL Gleyed: Yes ~qp~,~-~q' No Other indicators: ~4qC~)~-~2- ~qHyd~ric soils: Yes No_; Basis: ~2qA~q@~2qJ~f~q; ~X ~.~. ~qC~6q" < Hydrology Inundated! Yes. No Depth of standing water: 4~. ~j~-~q, Saturated soils: Yes-~qj~qf~'~6q@~'~, No Depth to saturated so~0qA:~qp~8qA~;~, other indicators: ~q:~q5 ~q4~qL ~0qC~20q/ Wetland hydrology: Yes ~4qp-; No' Basis: Atypical situation: Yes_; N~qo~0q-~40qz~80qf- Normal Circumstances? Yes ~q,~q-~0q' No Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments: Determined by: B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Name: ~6qC~v, ~-4 ~qq ~qI~L~"~e~- ~f ~0q@ Number: Name:~0qF~e~r~r~-~,~,_~q1 ~q!~q; State: ~0qW ~q1~q2 ~o~u~nt~qy~: ~4qC~1, Legal Description: Township: Range:_ Da t~qt: ~4qSp ~6qp ~q1~,~q6 ~q@ ~0qq ) Plot No.:. ~6q4 ~6q6 Section: Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species -Statu's Trees Herbs I ~- ~s ~t, ~0q<~qr~-~qj~q4 ~e~-) I- 2. ~-7 ~c~.~, ~q ~qF~.4~c ~L~A~q) 8. 3. 9. Saplings/shrubs Woody vines 4. ~r ~.~0 ~q6 ~C~% ~2qk~c~- ~L~k io. ~qF- ~q-~- n >~, ~6qQ~A L) 5. V; ~2q6, AL., ~a~x ~e- ~C~, ~2q@~0 L 6 12. ~qZ of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC:~6qX ~q9~,~". Other indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes ~q- No ~k~l~*~*~q" Basis: Soil Series and phase:~.~qU ~W~-~J~qL~qJ~2 On hydric soils list? Yes N~o~q-~8qz~q:~2q@ Mottled: Yes. No Mottle color: Matrix color ~*1~0q6 ~q!~qe~4qp ~q3~8qV~4~q4~. Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators: ~qHyd~ric soils: Yes- No__~qE~q:~q@~q@~q-~, Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes No Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yes No ~v~,~q"~-~. Depth to saturated soil: other indicators: ) ~q1~q. ~q- I Wetland hydrology: Yes_; No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes No Normal Circumstances? Yes ~q,-~6q' No Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments: Determined by: ~q1~16q/~4q2~60q4 B2 7j, 0 11 i15L 145, X 149.. 150 6 RACE TP CK S.EL FIELD 144.9 9v 1Q, @440 B2 TM ReD T Tm r Al r VX, 3 MID3 MIBZ ErE II5Z E 2:, MIC3 40 ShB ShB2 MnC3 oak "h MIN luB2 MuA hC2 Er' SrE 4 lEt @:Iplmp, B2 71 uA C, sh BIB2 B. u C hC3 7 Keu I @A ErE- DID, 1-7 ..Srk. SrE MIB2 -EiF -5 cg, ~0 ? ~~, 1 P 250 ~ 4 IMAGO fir Pie ~P~-~1~6 ~Ck~U~A~V~V ~A~A~W~qM~W~d ~j~w~A~w~d 41~9~d~e~a~s ~1~9~9.~94A~. ~.~1 ....... . ~O~U~N~T~Y ~A~A ~P~& ~.~A~~~~ ~/~0~ A. C~"~-~L~l~l~l ~4~1~1~60 ~~ A~9~9~2~69~/~13~6 J~41~d~e~s RIM a. sows" .~ J~L~* ~1~70 ~4~4~1~6 ~6~9~.~9~4, ~4~4. ~~4 .5~ Ono ~I~S~qM~W~A~W~r ~0q=~,~W~A~3~9~W ~#~&~W~A ~3~9 ~o~l~l ~409.~3~q" If. ~A~s~e~t~o~qw Alit ~s ~A~K~W~W ~s~o~m~o~ur~f~o~r~m~i~n #Ad ~4~4 row ~o~t~a, ~A. ~*~1~1~7~6 ~1~62 ~o~w As ~.a ~8 ~q"~W~i~l~a. ~I~f~A~r ~.~~ ~A~d~o~f~t~%~@~a I~.~%~ ~"~'~o~! ~r~A~w Pill am. ~f~W To ~q@~W~q~p~. ~c~q-~, ~3~2~.~51~P~A. AV ~J~FA~I ~P~.~S44 ~F.~2~1~5 ~S~^~1 )A. ~10~0.00~" ~4 ~M so"" W. ~W~I~L~L~S~O~qW~S. ~3~0~L ~E~qML ~'~L~OCA~L~I~f~t~N~T~2~0 ~0~"~"~0~2~6~20 ~I~L~D 20 A~S~E3~2~qM3~9 ~1~6~9 ~1~?~7~t 4_ ~1.40a. ~C. ~L~c A ~P~. ~5~4~L ~p~s~, ~A~1~,0~1~6~2~A ~C~.~1~f~o~u~l~l~e ~P.~1~1 ~A~A~H~q:~7~/~2~6 ~9 ABC ~3~1~/~5~3 ~P~. ~S~L~]~r~^ ~P~.64~2 ~5~4~.~4~6~A I ~P~i~t~$ ~4 ~p it ~C~.~^~L~v~g ~0~0~4~0 '1, ~0~-~1~7~0 A~AH~N .~6.~9 ~A~A~q@~T~ql~s~s~l ~&.~0~0A. ~90 ~0 ~4~1~1 ~K I~qi~qi\ ~1~, 'AN. ~0.~30~5 A ~R~4~w "'AN A ~q7~q4 A A.- ~qtL~qI~qZ~qA~qS~qU~qMA.~qW~qI~qL~qS~qO~qN ~q2~q1~q0 J~qL~q8~q1~q/~q1~q9~q1 $;.VGA. AV ~qP~q. Now ~qP.~q8~q6~q8 'ago ~q5~q" ~q.~q6 ~q7 ~q. ~qF. ~qP~qC~qs~q@ TWO Oro ~qc~qo~qu~q"T'~qr ~q4~8q~~q4~q0~q5~qs~q"~qN~2q"~qA~qS Cc"= A~qs~qs~0qm~qs A~q9~q9~q2~q?~q3~q/?~q8~q4 JAC. ~q1~q2.~q4~q4~qA. ~ql~qo~qp~qw~2qm~qw~q. ~qw 44 To A. ~q1~q6 ~qd~qw ~qT~q-~q-~0q- ~qP~qA~qI~qW so. ~4qzoc ?. ~q50A ~qJ~q) ~qm~qo~qs~qs~qi~qr~qr ~qF~q3~q1~q0 lie ~q ~-~qF 9~q3 ~qA~qM~2qW~qA~8qM~8q@ Arm~8q" A~qSE343/~q4~q2~q9 ~q'~qA~qL~qW~qf A ~q-~qi~4q-~qI ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Name:.(,' A ~ql~v~@~@ Number:- Name: ~qd State: County: Legal Description: Township:. Range:_ Date: Plot No.: Section: Vegetation (list t~qhe three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator S2ecies Status Species Status Trees Herbs ~q1. ~q7. Do ~r~I ~c~.~,~,~, 2. ~qL~;~q6~K~;~A~@~c-~t~q0~re ~t 8. ~6qC~- 4~1 3. 5~@~ ~qt; 9. -4, r) Saplin~qgs/shrubs Woody vines 4. ~< ~qF~' A c. ~t~-~)) 1~q0. 5. ~q1~-~,~$ ~@~qQ~p~. - ~~, ~q6~a- 7 ~q0~1 6. 12. ~S ~q% of species t~qhat are ~OBL, FA~qCW, and/or FA~qC:~4qg~6qO /A Other indicators: ~2qL Hydrophyt~qic vegetation, Yes ~r~,~'~- No Basis: Soil Series and phase:J~@~qJ~Q~Q~,~q@~qL~q@~q4~0~'~qW~'~n On hydric soils list? Yes No_j~,~q@~q--~' Mottled: Yes ~ql~e~.~q"~'~q; No ~. Mottle color: ~qJ~qO~qV~q)~q? ~qq~4qZ~t~~qJ ; Matrix color: ~:~qZ~,~qf~-~qV~qq~0qA~-~,~- ~qGleyed: Yes No ~qP~q-~q- Other indicators: ~qHydric soils: Yes No Basis: ~9~1~1"~, ~@~q"~O~-~0q#4~1 Hydrology Inundated: Yes. ~V~-~q"; No Depth of standing water:--- Saturated soils: Yes No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: ~qr Wetland hydrology: Ye~qs_~8q@~00q@~q, No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes No Normal Circumstances? Yes ---'No Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwet~2qland Comments* Determined by:~q,:~16q@~q,-~q, B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Pro ~qject Name: Number: Name: ~1~0~q@ ~s State: ~q@~qA ~qT~q) ounty:~6q" Legal Description: Town~sh~qip:~q-Range: Date: ~-~q- q ~q9 Plot No.: Section: Vegetation [list t~qhe three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Status Trees Herbs 1.~,~qp~q)e ~qj~e-, ~4~c~c. 7. r 2. ~@~qJ 8. 3. 9. Saplings/shrubs Woody vines 10. F~q/ 5. ~q1~q1.~qL ~C~- o r ~#4 ~c~-- 6. 12. % of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC:~@~@~2p~p~~ Other indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No Basis. Soil Series and phase: On hydric soils list? Yes No Mottled: Yes ~2q"~, No Mottle color: Matrix color: ~c Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators: :~--~i Hyd~r~qic soils: Yes ~k~q-~-~- No Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes ~,~q-~'; No Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yes ~k~,~-; No Depth to saturated soil: ~e, Other indicators: Wetland hydrology: Yes No Basis -5 Atypical situation: Yes No Normal Circumstances? Yes ~qe~q-~0q' No Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwet~2qland Comments: ~2q7~88q4~q, ~q5 1'. ~q1~q.~q17 -~q.4- Determined ~0qby:~q,~q@~q,~q-~q'~8q@~q' B2 ~0 DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project ~qN~umber~t Name: ~q4~1~q,~q@ ~V State: )A ~qT~q) ~6qCo~nlity~: Range: ~, 1~q,~,~,~qf Legal Description: Township~* Date: Plot No.: ~8q4 Section: Vegetation (list the three dominant species i~n each vegetation layer (~q5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with a~n asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species -Statu's Trees Herbs ~qI. A& FA~c) 7. ~0q6~) ~-~s ~l~o ~4~@ ~7 -1 a, ~C~) 'I, 2. ~q@~,~,~f ~q@~qn~o~ql~q, ) ~- 8~- 1~-3 o 3. V ~e A ~qr 9~. ~q0~.~1 a Sa~qp~ql~qi~ng~s/~shrub~s Woody vines 4 ~.~,~:~:~qL e- ~,~p ~-~1 ~q10. ~L~_ ~0 ~@~J ~s~, ~C~_ ~0 ~0 ~1~1 ~C 5. V~A~e~-~c~, ~qJ~q1 I 6. ~2qr~ql ~0 ~!,~'~, ~q1~q2. of ~spe~c~qle~s t~qhat are 0~1~1~1, FACW, and/or FAC~- Other indicators: Hydr~ophyti~c vegetation: Yes ~r~q"~6ql~u Basis:. e-~q0~ Soil Series ~a~nd phase: On hydric soils list? Yes No Mottled~: Yes ~)~e-~' No Mottle color: , ~- ~i Matrix color: Gley~ed: Yes No Other Indicators: Hyd~r~qic soils: Yes ~s._~q@No Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes No Depth of standing water- Saturated soils! Ye~s No Depth to ~s~aturnted soil. Other Indicators: Wetl~qa~qnd hydrology: Yes No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes No_ Normal Circumstances? Yes We~4qtl~qa~qnd Determination: W~qetl~qand ~2qNo~qnwet~6ql~qa~qn~6qd Comments: ~qq ~qe a ~qv~qn ~q-~qo Determined by: ~q7~q1 _~qe~2qt~0q,~q, ~8qK~64q; B2 ~0 DATA FORM I W~qETLAND DETER~qMINA~'~qr~qI~qON Applicant Application Project Name: ~qC~@~-~qi~y~q"~2qA ~0qC, Number:. State: ~q1~1~qA ~4qU ~o~u~nty: Legal Description: T~own~sh~qip:~q-R~a~nge: Date (1 1~:2 7 Plot No. Section, ~q@~q-~e~qg~.~q@~q-~qL~at~ql~o~n (list t~qhe three dominant species i~n each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers) I. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations w~qit~qf~, an asterisk. ~qh~i~qd~ql.c~nt~or Indicator ~0qa~.~qS~c ~qi e s Status Species Stat~q@~s Trees Herbs F ~J~/~1 ~c~- 7. r a ~e-~a~.~1~1 ~"~V ~.~5 ~T ~'~4 ~qr~, ~C ~C~-~- -I ~e~t 3. 9. ~qL ~q>~,~, -~, ~t~. e~. ~0q0 L S~a pl~qi~ng~s / stir ubs Woody v~qlne~s ~q10. r ~tp I ~0qFA ~C~@~q) 6. A 12. ~qZ of species that are ~qO~qR~qL~, FA~qCW, and/or FA~qC~: Other indicators: ~qHydrophytic vegetation: Yes No Basis: Soil Series a~nd phase: ~F~-~)~" ~o On hy~qdric soils list? Yes No Mottled: Yes No Mottle color: Matrix color::?, ~qG~qleyed~: Yes N~o Other Indicators: ~Hydr~-~q1c soils: Ye~s_~1~4~0q@ No Hydrology ~qI~nu~ndnt~ed~: Ye~s ~qHo Depth of ~otn~ud~qi~ng water: Saturated Rolls: Yes No Depth to saturated ~s~o~qil:~~,~-~qIe~-~- Other ~6qt~6qw~6qitc~qator~qs: W~qetla~qnd hydrology~q- Y~qe~qR No Basis~q: Atypical situation: Yes No Normal Circumstances? Yes ~q#~q.~q-~0q" No Wetl~qa~qnd Determination: W~qetl~qind Nonwetland Comments: Determined by: B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Appl~qic~ati~o~t~t Project Name 4 ~e~' Number-. St~ate:~q_~2qL~-~0q"~_~qi~q_~qC~0U~I~Ity: Legnl D~e~s~cripti~o~qw Township: Range:_ Date: 'I/ Plot No.: ~qSect~qlo~qw ~'~qR 7 Vegetation [list the three d~o~in~qi~n~a~nt ~spec~qles in e~n~c~qil vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 Inyer~s~q)~q]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with ~a~t~i asterisk. ~qh~id~qi~c~ntor Indicator S~qeec~qle~s Status S~q2ec~qies Status Trees Herbs 7.T ~q2. ~4qU ~V~.~& ~C ~L~i) ~q8. ~q3. ~8qr ~q4~-~0 ~.~1 ~- 1~0 ~C~-~,~:~, ~T (~2qrA~cj~qi) 9. Woody vines 5. 6. 12~- ~s~2q/~q; ~qd) ~c~- ~qZof species L~qh~at are ~01~1~qL~, FA~CW, and/or FAG: Other Indicators: ~qI~qly~qdrop~qhyt~qic veg~eL~at~qi~o~qw~- Yen A--- No Basis: Soil ~q!~q!~qS~.~,~- ~5 ~1 ~4q#~ S e r ~qie~s and ph~a~ge: ~e~q-)~0q4 ~< I a ~C On hydric soils list? Yes-; No Yes No Mottle color: ~@~~q) Y~l~q@ 3~,~q/~qJ Mottled: ~@/~:~z ; Matrix color: ~qGleyed: Yes No Other ~qi~t~id~qic~at~or~s: ~I~lyd~r~qic soils: Yes A-- No- ~q; ~qB~n~"~qi~s~: ~qI~qlydr~o~ql~u~q&~qZ ~N~o Depth of ~S~t~n~i~ld~qi~l~i~qg ~Wnt~er: ~q7 ~qInu~i~8qW~ot~ed I Yes~q- Saturated soils: Yen ~k--; No Dep~Lh to saturated ~so~qi~ql:~qC~4q/ <_ ~qJ~'~, Other ~8qI~qi~qid~4qic~qator~qs~q.~q, Wet~2qiand hydrology~q- Ye~qs No B~qn~qg~8qi~qs~q: Atypical situation: Yes Normal Circumstances~8q7 Yes No W~qetla~qnd Determination~q- Wet~4ql~qi~qn~0qd No~qnwetl~qa~qnd Comments: ~6qDete~qrm~0qi~qi~qied by: _~qJ ~6q1~6q32 -13 N I;; .13 iW/ lzo -:ZO /-1, 154 47, .1290 J3 /",/ , r-150- /.!o A/z, 14,3 0 ;cc rp .9 143.5 1'.9. I;v If A Ak -77 . . ---_ - I..1 -,4 . Ali s /* 140 V 0...X �3 r of,i", V11-1V \11 1-9 414- 1 .43.0 N yo It 135s 62 P A VERT COUNTY, MARYLAND !3111--El NUMBER 18 ShC3 vV;)(:j [IF SIM IWOM) FEET 'X ReB pe, T e S1102 ( 0 s s C3 ... ... my" R ma WaD2 5 .ev net; C8 R C t e6 A% -1., r clot) 11118 Ix Ric 0 B- ShC3 en Ef S,.G MA !fly i,. :,--y'! e hC3 Irv "j, 17 Rd8 ShC3 W11-A 1.11 7". ten' Shc A. b ShO WE :g et Cu FS Reu 7r: Min.) NA11 lieu StiC3 S1 z 1920(M FEET @Mfi 9, bows" jLb 001446 PAO 212 IF V* it 84 64 40S.304. .06 AWF.W.AWJWV at IS :20W V44 otu R 9 A. JOINT VKNTLW9 ABE 334,03 4LO A. P.34 Pat 4 WasA. JUMP 34 Aw -@, , 3 -".CAW .0 mol 17 rm - -all 9.14 W.-Fo."SA, M. "A/ 14.35 A. 40 SAIAMW fov@ L 00.1m WAY L 60.10 9.1 1, - ?. 'at 3#W13 5/393 AW 189.66A. V. P.3 1*64 LT^L BY To FLO jaMpor AD=GLo AAE3224 I PIC 6 1 ALDNIA C lie P. 564 Ic P &Aft 3V Is ABE ISVIA639 A.WAWffMM I- A PSJLSI mateftow OZ P.343 :3ilA. .P.61@2 L IC. yr-orr 4 D A. 110 -W,*.- P. r6i, S As P209 27 If IA V.,W4 ..a 303 PAR v 14 Aro KUZAGIT ;.A.WILSON Mw 09, 1 T I JLS d . - I, WTS 1.112 A. P.368 394 Troop t &o- F.23r. P.m, WPGRO PAW AtAOA Its CEMM Amaw@s ZT.V754, .0&4 Wal a As 44 'a'. 10.44k p A 01 595 P"ILIP, T. A",# so D JV -- j;l ?ABA. ;; -co m U- Jf d. *wPj7"w 0.294 ABE 3 11621i ;4 a Soo .4/yr4w, S.fff@w V97 ~0 DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application ProJect ~qP~l~l~c~'~,~4-~q1 ~qName:~4qa,~qt~y,4 c~a Number: Name: ~2qW~,~'~qj i ~q;~,~,~,~q, ~, State: ~q1~6qA ~ID county: ~2qC~ej~qu~qg~,~1~q4 eg~al Description: Township:. -Range:_ Date~f:~. ~@~qS~4qq~, ~-~qX7~, ~4qH I I Plot No.: I Section: Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Status Trees Herbs I ~- L; ~J~0q4, ~0qk, ~q4~,~q1 (F~qAc~-~qk)~q'~- All ~qi ~e~v~) 2. ~8qC~o~-~,~-y ~o, ~4q+~o~,~q"~V~q-~*~r~I~q4~-~o~qs~c~q@ (~qv~0qF~0qL~q) 8. 3. 9. Saplings/shrubs Woody vines 4~.C~4~@~-~I~8qf~q"~n~q"~s ~e-~Q-~-~O~q@~I~n~'~1~0~@~-~%~v~, ~q(~0qF~0qA~qC~q) 10. L~o~n~,~'~c~-~&~q-r~1~2~- 5 . ~n 1~q1. ~0qP~,~- ~- ~q@~L~j ~e~,~,~i ~C~, ~C~@~q; ~-~@~.~s ~Q~q@~qs FA ~6qC~qt~qA) 6. 12.~2qM~qi~q4~8qJ~-~q)~q1~q0~, ~f ~qa~2qf~g-~1 ~qS ~qA~C~-~(~qA~q) L ) ~qZ of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC:~2qI~0qQ~q@~2q9~2q/~r Other ind~qicators:~q1~0q1~r~A~e~-~- Hydrophytic vegetat ion: Yes ~q- No Basis: Soil ~6qs~a~s~s~a~, ~g~r~qa~-~5 ~C~,~-~I~l~2qk On Yes_; No ~6qP~q@ ~. a Series and phase: ~2qW~.~S ~q@~qP~qj~3~qa~ql hydric soils list? Mottled: Yes. No_~ql~.~,~,~q" . Mottle color: Matrix color~:/~8qOYR Gleyed: Yes No ~@~.~.~6q@Other indicators: Hyd~ric soils: - Yes- No__~qk~qf~q:~q:~-~-~*~, Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes ~' No Depth of standing water: Saturated soil Yes No__~I~qf~q:~q:- Depth to saturated soil: ~s~: Other indicators: Wetl~qand hydrology: Yea_; No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes N~6qo-~2qt~6q:~2q:~4q:~6q:~04q@. Normal Circumstance97 Ye~qs-~qt~2q@~84q@~6qN~4qp_~q- Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments: Determined by: %..A B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project Name:~4qc~,~,~qI~V~4~-~,~6q4 ~6qC~1~6~o~, ~0qi~qv Number: Name: ~q1~,~q/! ~.~1 State: ~2qP~,~q1~q2 ounty: C~.~, Legal Description: Township: Range: ~, ~qJ~v~a~,~,4 ~q- I Date~f:~.~q'~-~>~,~.-~,~,~qe~. ~q;2~-7, ~q1~q111 Plot No.:. Section: A~0q6~.~v~t~-- ~q@20 J~I~2q& Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Statu's Trees Herbs ~qC~-~0 7. r ~2qV~-~qt 2. (~qF~-~8qA~-~0qL~qL~,~,~;~q) ~q8. ~0qP~- I~6q/~V~q1 1~4q3 L 3.~-~qr~8q-~qX~v~c~qQ~.~q@~,~-~-~-~% 9. Sapling~s/~shrubs Woody vines 4. A~qJ~v\~V~.~.~S ~q1~q3L) 10. 5. ~ql~a ~2qF~6qA~c~- ~q"~1 ~q1~q1. 6. 12. % of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC:~8q1~8q6 Other indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes ~qv--~q-N~-o Basis: Soil Series and phase: On hydric soils list? Yes_; No Mottled.: Yes_;.No_. Mottle color: Matrix color: Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators: ~qHyd~ric soils: Yes- No Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes~q-~qk~4qL~8q"~, No Depth of standing water: ~e~, Saturated soils: Yes~q-~0qz~-~*~ql No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: Wetland hydrology: Yes ~q@~q-~8q-~q,~4q@No Basis: Atypical situation: Yes No ~2qC~2q/ Normal Circumstances? Yes Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments: ~24qL~q-~44q?~q.~q,~qt~4qJ~qC~4qQ~q- r~04qP~4q-~2qS~q-~0q5~q- ~qo_ ~q.5 ~qe_~2q= ~6q'~q0, 4~q,~q, ~qc~q-~0qo Determine d by B2 ~0 DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application ProJect Name: ~0qC~qa~ql~qv~,~,~6q4 Number: Name: ~qc~0qi State: ounty:~6qC~.~,~,~,~.~qI~v~j~,~,~,~6q+ egal Description: Township: Range:_ Date: Plot No.: 3 Section: ~qt~4q3~e~ql~o~qw ~0qp~I~n~l~i~e~4qQ Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Status Trees Herbs ~q1. P ~-~a~e~-~e~-~,~'~o~6qk~0q" 4~,~% 1 is 7. ~8q0~q0~0q" 2. ~qL~A~@ ~o~, -~4q4~, ~qs ~c~-~-~. ~qs ~V~- 3. L~'~N ~q& ~0q4~6qy ~q(~2qF~8qA~C~-~q) 9. Saplings/shrubs Woody vines 4. A ~qio. A 5. ~4qU be, ~i ~2q7~.~0qo ~t~ql ~e~- ~L~j) 6~-A~e~q-~e~-~.~- ~q@~q1~=~6q"~q) 12. % of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FA~qC:~qL~2q2~0q2~.~4q0 Other indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes ~v~-~-~-No Basis., Soil Series and phase: _ ~, On hydric soils list? Yes~q-~2qz~-~q" No Mottled: Yes. ~w~l~q" No Mottle color: ~r~-~,~,~c Matrix color:~2qg~.~qT~qy~1~q4~8qZ~qR Gleyed: Yes N o Other indicators: Hyd~ric soils: Yes-~qk~qf~q!~q:~q@~.- No Basis: ~qC~qk~r~g~y~c S~. Hydrology Inundated: Yes ~8qK~q-~-~-~,~q"No Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yes No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: Wetland hydrology: Yes ~4qe-~q-~q-~q,~0q-N~qo Basis: ~4qC I ~0qC ~qV~q%~q!~4qS~q' Atypical situation: Yes ; No_~4qk~4qf~00qf~q'. Normal Circumstances? Yes ~8qk~8qf~q-~88q@ No- Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments: Determined by: B2 N or A 777@ 2eK F-- FL V V, .1548 d A V,IV ,290 /-N, ".4b J)1 150- UC2 ),3 E V 036s NkK - 7 tZ 'k I k%s Cw 140 k\ tlo\ elk! 1446 r Al N R" NZ =.@ 41 L I1L\ I Y'A W, V, 41A JAMO uj all - 4 f 1 6 'jai /20 IL 62 .,4r r COUNTY, MARYLAND SHEEI NUMBER 18 C3 ShC3 1920000 FEET sbc. Ay silo 'TZF Re 2 Sk3 n 0? 'Srf Acig'. Rec, i82 s 43 SIE;. P@S C V. ErE' f; YI EvB -"r WC2 RdB WB 4r, SbC3 aBzi.;.i ShB2 t Re W .-WX ffill" vl_ oil ;Sit- RdB SaC2 Rai tit r ma "lieu .xy, hD . VPD3.-'. -i:" '4 ft Wn[32 ..tw, A@ C Re 4' /C shQ, A D mi 1E.; m r bit SIIQ . ........... Pun RU%'.d LL Cox a- Wt- W4 "T ON ASA. 4 piw RIV palf Cavan COMM.GrOALVan, Cavan, :.137 .............. '77 OA I* PAIAT SILPANAMIS Otis C"Alkas lopolill Alloolulm ROM sows% 60.2&^. 04 AM a jri= IV All 'A",c. 40114"V- .go0 RIN Is Asp Apd, g4w a d1liblow or mid 44 MT Volvas - 4 row, sallialf R*4 AINNoft &W It A-MOW AW O"W* eir fist Am RAW st.16A. KAV L "Was L &0094 All 11*460 100.00 'we-m- .4 MV384' A14340/323 lig.664. YL a" VMS ps X.Mm W. WILLIA04%, 31L.. am CALVERT ... . ...... ... IL: I A, I A116021120 ILS". ILG 1% 5 6 Nl. 0.10 6, -1 .. 0epar-A-TIVc.l.L. %, .629 J&D I!,at; V.476 44 ADS llwaslll 41. JUM so P.6 4'N 10 P.19 4 Mo. .1616# '.400 IT "binj"o -:4 MAP --moo a I@al it RI PAR Let. Agent. r M JPW MAP. cowerr CAL.IXT to. AS 75K :9 0.44A. 44:90 AM.4 lw TNI-, . ........... 11 Af q 7.90A is r Mo _0! ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project ~0qr Number: Nam Name~:~(~qr~q,~q1~1~f~'~,~8q4 -~0 e:~8qd ~0qR~o~.~2q@~qo D~r~q:~qv~e- State: ~q-~0qL~-~0qU~q-~q-~q@~6q"unty: e~qg~al Description: Township, Range*.- Date: ~q4~1~4qA~qZ~qq~.~2q/~-~qT I Plot No.: Section: Vegetation (list t~qhe three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. ~qV~d~q@~qS~c~-4~,~4~2q@~'~o~l ~qa~qS~qL~qI~'~CA~.~qC~.~1~0~-~1~q4~' Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Status Trees Herbs ~q1. ~qr~q-~8qJ &Is ~qV~o~6qW~% ~q(~qFA~&~6~% 7 . ~-~qr ~qk vo ~1~1~0~qV~q~L~q1~q0~0~-~C~L~C~-~4~-~-~4~S~q;~qS ~6q0~8q4~2q0 2. ~L~. 8. A 3.~qL 9. Sapling~s~qt~ahrubs~~- Woody vines 4. A 6. ~4qe-- F~4qA ~C~-) 12. -I to- ~4 ~C~qL ~qZ of ~spec~qies~.that ~-~are~@OBL, FACW, and/or FAC~:_~q?~qj~4qk~0 Other indicators: ~qHydrophytic vegetation: Yes No ~r~-~q'. Basis: Soil Series and phase., ~v~qJ~&~0qA~-~qa~qiA~, 1~q1~1~% On hydric soils list? Yes_; N~qo-~-~0qe~l~q-~,~, ~qm~ott~0q4~qd~.: Yes -~8qe~q"` No_. Mottle c~olor-j~qo~qy~q?, ~L~qj~2qZ~q1~,__; Matrix color:~q;~qZ~,~qg~qy~14~0qZ3 ~- ~qGleyed: Yes No Other indicators: ~e~- No Hydr~-~qic soils: Ye~qs Basis: ~8qM~&~q4~. Hydrology Inundated% Yes No D~eptl~i of standing water~i Saturated ~soi~ql~s~.~,~,~2p~~p~p~p~p~ No Depth to saturated soil: .Other indicators. Wetla~qnd hydrology: Yes ~qr~q-~2q-; No' Basis: Atypical situa ~q-t~q-ion: Yes-; No__,=- Normal Circumstances? Yes ~qe~q-~q--No Wetl~qa~qnd Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments- T~8qk~4qA~, wow ~4q6 a. ~q&~qJ~q'~qC~64qL~q-~q1 ~qO~q-~76qZ 4~6q4~qa Determined by.-. ~2q;~0q1~12qe~8q,~q- B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION . ..... Applicant Application Project L~A~A~qA~a so. L~A Name: ~qr_~,~.~qk ~~C~e Number: Name: of RKa~,~, ~4qp~t~qi~y~a~, State: ~qpunty: eg~al Description: Township: Range:_ Date: Plot No.: Section: Vegetation [list t~qhe three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Statu's Trees Herbs ~qCF~0qA~2q0 7. ~qC~@~,~#~A~A~o- ~8qFA~c~-~q- 8. ~6qF 9~' ~qL~4q3 a Sapling~s/shrubs Woody vines ~.6 ~0q(~J~qr~,~q4~e 4. ~f~- ~q10~. x 'a ~0qFA ~C- 5. 1 A ~6q(~8qr~,~q<~e~- u~-~1) 11. To ~x~C~'~o ~2qk~a~l~@~,~I~2qQ~e~qw -I ~-~-~a~'~6qA~ql ~C.~A~q^ ~5 ~2qr~-~q,4~qc~- 6. ~L~4 ~A~j ~C~@~~0 12. ~.~k ~(~qI~8qL ~c~@~'~OL ~-~1 ~'~qy ~q6~,~0~q1~q- F~qX~qC~--~J 'are O~qBL, %'of spec~qie~s~-that FAC~qW, and/or FAC~: ~qJ~g~qP~6qA~I~P. Other indicators: ~qHydrophytic vegetation: Yes No Basis: ~i~L ~c~L Soil ~0~. ~4~9~,~0 ~d~t ~2qP~P ~4 Series and pl ~tase ~q&~qJ~e~,~'~s ~q4~. On hydric soils list? Yes No ~v~-~q1 Mottle a. Mottle color:~qA~@~qp d~.: Ye Matrix color: ~ql~6qa~8qa Gleyed: Yes N~o~qL~, -,Other indicators: ~qa~c~qg ~d~k A ~C~, ~S ~q4 Hyd~ric soils: Ye No Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes- No Depth of standing water: Saturated ~soils:`~,Yes No Depth to saturated soil: ~:~1~@~1~1~-~@~0qM~8qW~@~1~1~@~q@ ~E~-~1 ~2qW~6qW~ Other indicators:, L Wet~0qlaUd hydrology: Yes No Ba~qsis~6q@ Atypical situa~-ti.o~4qn:~ Yes-; No-~0qk~q,~12q@~4q-~q. Normal Circumstances? Yes No Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland Comments: ~8q5 ~8qV~q.~q-~q- ~qr~qo ~q4~qk~q,~q-~qF ~ql~92qa~ql~ql~72qu Determined by: ~24qo~04qo~60q/, ~40qV B2 ~0 DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION A~plican~qt Application Project ~q4~. Name: ~qC~qk~v~q&~,~q@ ~2q6-~-~,~.~,4~qu Number: Name: ~4qs~.~.4~2q@ ~6qV OF State: ~q@~6qA~q:~qp ounty~:~C~-~t~-~q@~,~,~., Legal Description: Township: Range:_ Da t~q6: ~0q1~0q2~-~qq 1~4~q1 Plot No.: Section: Vegetation [list t~qhe three dominant species In each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species -Status Trees Herbs 7. ~4qP + ~q2 . ~q0 k ~@~% ~i ~L~r- ~0~. F 8. 3.~q4~.~" ~4qk~e~@~q~.~8q"- 4 ~6qL~,~4~qi~0qf~. ~6q@~0qF~-4~Q~J~qA~q) 9~- ~qSaplings/~shru~qbs~@ Woody vines ~q4. ~6qA~q1 ~q6 ~%~-~1~1~q@~'~-~z~-~q; ~,~@ ~s ., ~q(~qt~A 10. L ~q~2qp -I ~C~@ ~C~, ~2qF~2q@ 6. ~q1~q2. ~q2 of species that-are O~qUL, FACW, and~qjor FAC:~qa~:~q~q@~,~e~,. Other indicators: ~qHydrophyt~qic vegetation, Yes No ~P~,~*~q"~. Basis: Soil Series and phase* ~0~qa On hydr~qic soils list? Yes_; No. Mottled.: Ye~s~~!' No Mottle color: Matrix color: ~l~o ~8qe~8qx~0ql~4~ql~. Gleyel: ~qYe~s ,,-'Other indicators: ~4q0~6 ~qHyd~r~qic soils: -'Yes No ~p~e- Basis: 2 Hydrology Inundated* Ye's N~o__~,~!~:~qf~6q@ Depth of standing water: ~-~~7 ~- ~7~, Saturated soils: Yes No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicator'. ~q9: ~2qs~12qo~qa ~2qt~q,~0q4~q- ~0qx ~q4, ~q'~qe~0q- ~q0 ~qj~q7 Basis, Wetla~qnd hydrology: Yes_; N~qo__~64qZ~q. ~qL~qj J ~4qJ ~q-~qe a ~qC~q- ~qm ~qC~qL Atypical situation: Yes No_~q,~q,~0q:~24q@~8q-~q. Normal Circumstances? Yes ~q@~q-~4q' No Wetla~qnd Determination: Wetland Nonwetland ~qe~ql~q-~20q@ Comments: ~qe-~84q4 I. ~qd~qk ~0qs ~q, ~q4~qA~q. 6~q#. ~qv ~qok~q@ ~6q1~q0~q,~qV ~qe~q@ Determined by: ~28q7~q1~2qJ~6q@~qA~q% -~8qf ,-I ~0q!~8q@~80qj ~qe- B2 ~0 7~: DATA FORM I WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant Application Project ~qNam~'e:~0qC~,~n~2qL~qP_~0qA ~6qC~-~q4~%A~A Number: Name:,~,~-~6qr ~4qR-~q@~qZ~~1~6 State: ~U ~t Legal Description: Township: _Range: Date: ~qC~qt ~4qZ~-~q2 I Plot No.: Section: . . . . . . . . . Vegetation ~q(li~st~.the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known Physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator S ~qpe c ie ~9 Status Species Status ~qq~, Trees Herbs 1 e- 7. ~C~x ~qK ~*~-~i 2. 8. ~e~l~o~l ~c~f~@ A~8qJ~q: A ~<~- ~Q~, A 3. 9. Sapl~qing~s/~shrubs . . .... 4. ~0qL~it~v~-~q; 10. M 4 ~n ~q;~O~@~. ~-~S ~4~-~-~qw~l A~-~6 A ~S 5. ~S ~q(F ~qA~,~q(~A~qJ 6. 12. -that are O~qBL, FACW, and/or ~q% o~qf ~species~@ FAC~-~1~q1~4q0~2q0~2q% Other indicators: Hydrophytic v Yes No Basis: ~.~q@~qA~qetatio~n~: Soil Series and phas on hydric soils list? Yes No ~8qV~1~- Mottled Yes, Mottle color: Matrix color:1~q3~q1,_~qL No Gleyed~, Yes Other indicators: Hyd~ric soils:.-'- ~qYe~s~q@~0q@ No_; Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes No Depth of standing water: Saturated soila~l~,~:.Ye~a ~oo~0~o; No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: Wetla~qnd~q. hydrology.-: Yea ~qV~qo~qo' No' Bag is ~64qk~qe~qr~qA ~qS~qN~q'~ql ~qS-~q3 ~q6~q, ~q4 ~qe2 Atyp~2qic~qal.situation ~q'~.Y a No ~qV~q-~4q-~4q-~q. 'Yes Normal Circumstances? No Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland ~q"~qM~qi~0qi Comments: Determined by: A ~q1~04q0~q. ~0q;~56qO~60qe ~0qD2 -: Et--- - -) iMY I Ak ", @lu Irj@ ;iy ><, 140 4al. rl; 47\ 100 IT 2 .'gu 150 k4 129.5 L7 jj loo CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND - SHEE] NUMBER IS MID3, hC3 'NaC3 DE SIC Evc ErE a Lv.n Sh03 j Mn82 y Er.E. Sh Sh W3 7- met; MnB sh s E ErE E Re ReC Reo RB eC me Sh ShO 0 Kev My "SrE J 82 1c; rim Rep "V% uj n. 7 sho E - C T m 3' RdB StE AM r.Re Re S'E shm sh 4c, SrE ShC3 03. SrE ReC _-Rec B mnl RdS SrE R Cp SrE ReC > RIC er I m I I I I APPENDIX B I I I I I I I I I I I CONSENT FORM FOR ACCESS I/we give my/our consent to allow access of the Calvert County Department of Planning and Zoning's environmental consultant onto our property identified below for the purpose of conducting a gross wetland delineation. I/we understand that vegetation will not be cut or flagging left on the site and that all work will be completed by the end of September, 1991. Date Property Owner or Agent's Signature Date Co-owner's signature PROPERTY OWNERS NAME AND ADDRESS: The Gott Company Rte 2/4 Prince Frederick, MD 20678 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TAX MAP NO. 24 PARCEL NO.14 & 15 ais form into thirds, staple or tape secure and return to ,anning & Zoning (postage provided) If consent is denied, please return blank form without signatures. 1_@'Proper; E Ic z 1 'v zv z s IE CONSENT FORM FOR ACCESS I/we give my/our consent to allow access of the Calvert County Department of Planning and Zoning's environmental consultant onto our property identified below for the purpose of conducting a gross wetland delineation. I/we understand that vegetation will not be cut or flagging left on the site and that all k will be completed by the end of September, 1. Date rty owner or A46n -I's-S'Ignature Date Co-owner's signature PROPERTY OWNERS NAME AND ADDRESS: Calvert Association for Retarted Citizens 355 W. Dares Beach Road Prince Frederick, MD 20678 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TAX MAP NO. 24 PARCEL NO.66 Fold this form into thirds, staple or tape secure and return to Planning & Zoning (postage provided) . If consent is denied, please return blank form without signatures. je r Pro4pe lty0iW2ner "IT CONSENT FORM FOR ACCESS I/we give my/our consent to allow access of the Calvert County Department of Planning and Zoning's environmental consultant onto our property identified below for the purpose of conducting a gross wetland delineation. I/we understand that vegetation will not be cut or flagging left on the site and that all work will be completed by the end of September, 1991. Date Property/OvMer or Agent's Signature Date Co-owner's signature PROPERTY OWNERS NAME AND ADDRESS: Calvert Village LTD Partnership 5550 Friendship Blvd Chevy Chase, MD 20815 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TAX MAP NO. 24 PARCEL NO.236 Fold this f orm into thirds, staple or tape secure and return to Planning & Zoning (postage provided) . If consent is denied, please return blank form without signatures. CONSENT FORM FOR ACCESS i/we give my/our consent to allow access of the Calvert County Department of Planning and Zoning's environmental consultant onto our property identified below for the purpose of conducting a gross wetland delineation. I/we understand that vegetation will not be cut or flagging left on the site and that all work will be completed by the end of September, 1991. -7/ Pro /Date p.@ ty owner or Agent7s Signature Date Co-owner's signature PROPERTY OWNERS NAME AND ADDRESS: Mr. John Williams, Jr. 2715 Hollowing Point Rd. Prince Frederick, MD 20678 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TAX MAP NO. 24 PARCEL NO. 566 & 5 APPENDIX C PRINCE FREDERICK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED FISCAL YEAR 1992, COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT GRANT PROPOSAL ACKN E GEMENT Preparation of this report was pa tially funded by the Coastal Resources Division, Maryland Depar ment of Natural Resources, through a grant provided by the Coa tal Zone management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by t Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National ceani and Atmospheric Administration. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRINCE FREDERICK, THE HUNTING CREEK WATERSHED III. REVISED WORK APPROACH During the current (October 1, 1990 to September 30, 1991) Coastal Zone Contract Period, Calvert County has received CZM funding for a Category B project to investigate the feasibility and requirements for conducting a Watershed Management Plan for Prince Frederick and the Hunting Creek Watershed. One of the products of this grant will be guidance maps to wetlands which combine the Wetland Inventory Maps with the soils map. From these maps, a detailed inventory of the wetland area by subwatershed and wetland type will be derived. Requests will be submitted to DNR, Natural Heritage Program and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to identify any areas that are habitat to rare, threatened and endangered species. These items will be completed during the first quarters of the grant period. From these findings, protection measures will be proposed in the watershed plan and county-wide and area-wide ordinances will be reviewed for consistency. Calvert County will have topography prepared for the portion of the watershed presently undocumented (approximately 55%, work to be completed during first three quarters of the contract period) - Topography is necessary for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. WRA will also provide a list of flood water gauging stations in the watershed and accompanying data. Water supply for potable water and fire protection in the watershed will also be reviewed in terms of quantity and quality of existing and projected future supply, water recharge, and wellhead protection. Water supply for potable water and fire protection will be investigated. WRA, Water Rights Division will provide a list of water appropriations for the watershed and provide technical assistance in the preparation of this section of the Plan. During the first quarter, the local government officials and local government department heads will receive a presentation on the objectives and scope of the watershed management plan and comments and directives will be requested. At the same time, an advertisement will be placed in the local papers announcing the beginning of the watershed management effort and requesting comments and volunteers to serve on a watershed management task force. After preparation of much of the mapping and factual data on the watershed (most carried out during the first and second quarters of the grant period), the task force will meet to begin to develop issues and guide the plan preparation. Interested parties including regional, state and federal agency representatives will be invited to meet with the task force at one of their early meetings. A draft Hunting Creek Watershed Management Plan including an implementation schedule will result . The draft Plan will be distributed for review by 'regional, state and federal agencies and the general public. IV* REVISED EXPECTED WORK PRODUCTS 1. Draft Hunting Creek Watershed Management Plan 2. Map of Land Use for the Watershed 3. Map of all potential Wetlands in watershed. 4. Table of Wetland Areas by Subtributary and Wetland Type. VI, REVISED SUPPORTING GRANTS The Flood Management Division, Water Resources Administration, Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers are considering conducting hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and mapping in the Hunting Creek Watershed as a contribution toward the Hunting Creek Watershed Management Plan Study (see attached letter from Ms. Hughes dated February 5, 1991). In addition, Counties along the Patuxent River are expected to receive funding through the federally funded "Patuxent River Demonstration Project" to address non-point source pollution to the Patuxent River with an emphasis on stormwater management. If these additional sources of funding are received then much of the work approach and many of the expected work products which have been deleted due to cuts in funding for this grant may be accomplished. These include work in the area of flood management, wetland function, and forest cover analysis. In addition, the stormwater management section of the watershed management plan could be greatly expanded. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT GRANT PROPOSED BUDGET REVISION SUMMARY ORIGINAL PROPOSAL REVISED PROPOSAL FUNDING LOCAL FUNDING LOCAL REQUESTED MATCH REQUESTED MATCH STANDARD 10,000 2,000 ACTIVITIES WATERSHED 20,600 18,700 13,000 13,000 PLAN TOTAL 30,600 18,700 15,000 13,000 DETAILED BUDGET STANDARD ACTIVITIES ORIGINAL PROPOSAL REVISED PROPOSAL FUNDING LOCAL FUNDING LOCAL REQUESTED MATCH REQUESTED MATCH SALARIES 10,000 2,000 DETAILED BUDGET - WATERSHED PLAN ORIGINAL PROPOSAL REVISED PROPOSAL FUNDING LOCAL FUNDING LOCAL REQUESTED MATCH REQUESTED MATCH SALARIES 91690 4,700 SUPPLIES 800 200 2,990* 100 EQUIPMENT 300 410** TRAVEL 310 100 CONSULTANT FEES 15,000 8,600 PRINTING AND REPORT 4,500 500 1,000 100 OTHER (TOPO MAPS) 8,000 8,000 TOTAL 20,600 18,700 13,000 13,000 $2700 to establish an Autocad software station for intern Cost of digitizer tablet to replace mouse in original proposal IIIINIIIIIIII]IM 3 6668 14103 9273