[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
- - ----------- Coastal Zone Intormation Canior CONSULTING ENGINEERING SOCIATES. INc. \j Th's cl-tcument was prepared in part throu,-,,,'-) f@nancial assistance provided by the Coastal Zorn Management Act of 1972 TC administered by the Office of Coastal Zone Management 328 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration T74 1985 16580 WYOMING AVENUE DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48221 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED WASHINGTON AVENUE MARINA ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE Prepared for The City of Ludington "'XaPertY Of CSC Librciry Submitted by: Consulting Ehgineering Associates, Inc. 16580 Wyoming Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48221 CONSULTING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 16580 WYOMING AVENUE TELEPHONE DI. 1-5797 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48221 September 9, 1985 City of Ludington 201 S. William Street LuJington, MI 49431 Attn: Mr. Gerald J. Richards, City Yanager F?e: Proposed Washington Avenue Marina on Pere Marquette Lake Gentlemen: In accordance with the agreement between the City of Ludington and this firm, the accompanying preliminary engineering report plans and estimates were prepared for the proposed construction of recreational boating facilities on a 9.3 acre site located on the east shore of Pere Marquette Lake just to the north of the city's Peter Copeyon Park. We are transmitting herewith, ten (10) copies of our report for your review and consideration. Very truly yours, Consulting BiaAi 3 Asso es, :neerin@ '9@iat -Jo C a .--P Jim/vlj ATTACH. CONTENTS Purpose and Scope ........................................ 1 Site Investigation ....................................... 1 Existing Utilities ....................................... 3 Alternative Plans ........................................ 4 APPENDIXES A. Logs of Soil Borings B. Preliminary Cost Estimates C. Preliminary Plans PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this engineering study is to determine the feasibility and most desirable means of constructing a recreational boat harbor on a site ad j acent to the Ci ty o f Lud ing ton I s Pe ter CDpeyon Par k. Th e 9. 3 + ac r e s i te which is located on the east shore of Pere Marquette Lake, lying west of Washington Avenue and north of Second Street extended, is shown on Figure 1. The requirements for this engineering study were detailed in the city's original Request for Proposals (RFP) , and, along with the usual planning and cost estimates, included extensive field surveys and soil investigations. In addition to these requirements, the city also requested that this study include consideration of a plan, developed by the Waterways Division. SITE INVESTIGATIONS Field investigations for this study included a property survey, a topographic survey, a hydrographic survey and subsurface investigations. The required property survey was performed by the firm of Nordlund, Dunlap and Associates, Inc. A surveyor's certificate was also prepared by that firm and a copy filed with City of Ludington. 11he required topographic survey which covered the entire site of the proposed project was performed by Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. This topographic survey served to locate existing structures, ground elevations and other pertinent features. The required hydrographic survey was made along the frontage of the proposed site for a distance of approximately 650 feet to the west of the northeast property corner. Soundings were made at 10 foot intervals along lines 50 feet apart, extending offshore, between 50 and 60 feet into the lake, to depths in excess of 10 feet below International Great Lakes Datum (EL 576.8). A plan of existing site conditions as determined by this survey work is shown on Plate Cl (see Appendix' C) . j 11011 7111 i., I - !111 ex It 0.2 fj A m"I'll 1-11 ; "'T @ @ I -I I I E.AWLE D@-@r a 71- HS -0 131-1 1 1 JR /I 0 w 1, , U, J, 1- 1,A1, -1,1@,1-14 '24, I' A jj 7 L d. 1-1 I'd Rail. Ono CHESAPEAKE 0410 Joe &A ig .!7 go orrep.l. sr. 1`71A 'Cold I Ll 'c -4 7. 7. S STUDY 7 7 60 X w A)j COP 04 It A (tol 1- 4. a I 7 rTT' Ll ('. *1111ril CITY OF LUDINGTON PROPOSED MARINA WASHINGTON AVENUE FIGURE I The required soil borings were made by the firm of Grand Rapids Testing Service. In conformance with the requirements of the RFP, soils exploration consisted of six borings taken to a depth 30 feet below existing ground. These borings locations are also shown on Plate Cl; and the logs of the borings are to be found in Appendix A. The soils encountered by this subsurface investigation can be characterized as loose to medium-loose fine sands. The only difficulty anticipated with excavating such soils in the dry would be in areas adjacent to the lake, where heavy ground water flows through these soils could lead to a dangerous quicksand like condition. The hydrographic survey work done for this study is deemed adequate for two of the four schemes developed in this study. However, should a plan be selected which proposes modification to the shoreline outside the limits of this hydrographic survey, additional field work will be required prior to any final design work. EXISTING UTILITIES Information regarding existing underground utilities was obtained from city records and frcm record maps maintained by local utility companies. Since available utility records are diagrammatic rather than showing as-built conditions, the locations of those underground services shown on Plate Cl should be considered as approximate only. Referring to Plate Cl, it is to be noted that the only sanitary sewer convenient to the site is located in Washington Avenue. Due to the difference in ground elevations it would be necessary to pump sanitary flows up to this sewr. It is understood that a sanitary lift station is to be installed to serve planned improvements in Copeyon Park, and that this lift station would be adequate to handle sanitary flows for the proposed project. Once that installation is complete, all required city services would be convenient for connections serving the project. 3 Electrical service in the Ludington area is provided by Consumers Power Company. Existing primary distribution in the vicinity is deemed adequate to service anticipated electrical demand for this project. ALTERNATIVE PLANS Four alternative layouts for the proposed Washington Avenue marina are presented in this study. A general plan of each is shown in Appendix C (Plates C2 through C5) and are discussed in this section. Schemes I, II & III were developed by Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. (C.E.A.) following requirements set forth in the city's R.F.P. and applicable design standards of the Department of Natural Resources, Waterways Division. it was assumed in the development of these three schemes that mooring was to be split between seasonal and transient boaters, and therefore, the percentage of slips provided in each length group follows current Waterways recommendation@ for such a facility. The nLnber of parking stalls provided in each of the schemes also follows those ratios currently in use. Since the R.F.P. did not impose any cost constraints, nor specify total number of slips to be provided, these layouts were developed letting site shape and existing topography control the size of the proposed mooring basin. Referring to Plate Cl, it can be seen that the abrupt change in ground elevation, along with the excluded parcel, serve to restrict development to the east. To facilitate excavation in the dry, each layout maintains a narrow strip of earth to function as a dike between the lake and the proposed basin prior to digging out the entrance channel, thereby minimizing costs for both excavating and shore protection. As a result, the mooring capacities of these three schemes were limited to between 55 and 63 boats. After review of these schemes, the city and Waterways Division decided that the proposed mooring facilities should be enlarged to accommodate at least 100 craft, and, 4 primarily be used for mooring of seasonal craft. On the basis of that criteria, Waterway's engineering staff developed an alternative layout which is included in this study as Scheme IV, providing mooring for 115 boats. This plan is shown on Plate C5. To achieve an increase in capacity over those schemes developed by C.E.A., it was necessary to enlarge the basin to the west, excavating out into Pere Marquette Lake; sheet pile an area to accommodate the toilet and shower building; excavate into the existing hill at the east end of the parking lot to provide for parking and elimination of mooring slips for 60 foot boats. This increase in size of the mooring basin reduced land area available for parking and, therefore, this scheme is short on parking for some 40 cars. of the plans developed by C.E.A., Scheme II is thought to represent the best of the three. However, if funding is available and maximizing mooring is the primary concern, then Scheme IV is certainly the plan of choice. The only real problem to be addressed in that plan is the need for additional parking. Utilization of the land area to the east of the basin is not thought to be practical or convenient. In those terms, the most suitable area for additional parking would appear to lie to the south of the propc)sed parking area where an additional 50 cars could be accommodated. Although this would solve parking needs, it does block future widening of the existing access road which may be incompatible with the inevitable increase in the traffic. 5 APPENDIX A LOGS OF SOIL BORINGS TAKEN FOR THE PROPOSED WASHINGTON AVENUE MARINA ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE IN THE CITY OF LUDINGTON Borings for this engineering study were taken by Grand Rapids Testing Service on July 29, 1985. The logs of these soil borings are presented in this Appendix and their locations are shown on Plate Cl of Appendix C. A-1 Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 48th St.. S.E., Grand Rapids, MI 49508 616-534-8277 ALA d& (Page I of 2) SURFACE ELEv 582.2 IrL- DEMRIMON 1 2 3 GRAVELLY TOPSOIL 2 3 5 1-5- LOOSE 2-5 2.0 BROWN CLAYEY SAND 2 6 5 4 3-0- BLACK fine to coarse SAND 4.0 AND GRAVEL WITH SOME ORGANICS 4 3 3 10 -5- BLACK ORGANIC MATERIAL 6.0- L.L (PEAT AND WOOD) 6 3 3 LOOSE TO MEDIUM LOOSE 5 2 6 8 7-5- 9-0- 1 10-5- BROWN 14-5- fine 8 16.o- 19.5 SAND 21.0 F9 18M Boring Continued on Page 2 Ar- =Mr) PEWMT70r4 R=7X4QE ff?0jECr Small Craft Harbor Ludinaton, Michigan FROJECT No. 60-0785 @5 6 *@-jEw? Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. ctjEw's FRouELT No %14 0- rM,!V D47E SM7rW- 7 / 2 9 / 8 5 _DATE WWFLETED 7/29/85 C)R,11 rr S. De Weese LpER R. Burmeister jj HC pLUGG,-M &jETHOD_ Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 48th St., S.E., Grand Rapids, MI 49508 616-534-8277 r WRING M I (Page 2 of 2) SURFACE ELEV 5 8 2. 2 3 U- N DEZRIP7M 1 2 3 Zl.n A R 0. 1 1 1 MED I UM LOOSE TC MED I UM DENSE BROWN 24.5- 26.o- fine E 28.5 SAND 30 0 30.0 Fy jo jE(,-r Smal lCraft Harbor Ludington, Michigan PROJECT No. 60-0785 @- 7' -;7' CUEML_ Consulting Engineering Astipc'-aty_-,,_ i-)-. cuwrt FRojEcr iyo DWE 7/29/85 __WTE COMPLETE[) 7/29/85 L _Elf S. De Weese -HELPER R. Burmeister PLUGGlr4GIWETHO0_jaural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 4sth St., S.E., Grand Rapids, MI 49508 616-534-8277 -ism IL BMING No 2 SURFACE ELEV 589.o wIq DESCRIFITM 1 23 0 . OVS 0 SOIL a 1 12 1. 1. 5BROWN SANDY TOPSOIL lb-I LOOSE 2 2 23 3-0- BROWN fine 4.3 SAND 3 22 4. 5'- VERY STIFF 4 9 912 6.o- BROWN 6.S SANDY CLAY MEDIUM DENSE 5 6 913 7-5- CLAYEY 8. SILT 8 14 18 9.0 HARD 10-5- CLAY 17 8116118 AND 13.0 SILT 14-5- LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE 16.o- BROWN fine 19.5 SAND 21.0, Boring Continued on Page 2 imoor) PEPETRAPoty- &=wcE Z r8 R-jojECr Small Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan -fROXC;T IYO. 60-07F5 es ajef it mac%-, no. Iwum a47E smRrED--!L2L8 -5 DATE WWRETED-_Z/ 2 9 / 8 5 DRfl-LER S. De Weese HELJ@M R. PLL)GGIIYG METHOD Natural Soil 'Grand Rapids Testing Service ALR 565 48th St S.E., Grand Rapids, Ml 49508 616-534-8277 AAA 01" SCRING NO 2 (Pa e 2 of 2) C) SURMCE ELEV U. DEMRIPnolq 1 2 3 21.0 01 a MEDIUM DENSE 24.5- BROWN 2 6. 0*_ fine 110 28.5 SAND 3P 0 30.0. DAR PRO ./E(,T Small Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan PROJECT M. 60-0785 CUEMT Consulting Enginpering Ar,-ociatpq cuEur's FRojEcr tqo DZUIW-. -DATE 57ARTED_J@@8 DATE CCIVIRETED 7/29/85 DR&1-Ef? S. De Weese HELPER R. Burmeister rjWGGlrqGMETHOO_ Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service an 565 4sth St., S.E., Grand Rapids, Yl 49508 616-534-8277 low, o7 WRING NQ 3 (Page I of 2) SURFACE ELEV 581.4 0. Ca DESCRIMM 1 2 3 WHITE 1 10 28 22 2.0 1. 5 SANDY lu .I I 23 22 3-0- (LIMESTONE) 2 10 +@- [OOSE DARK BROWN fine SAND 4-5- LOOSE TO VERY LOOSE � 12 4 5 BLACK ORGANIC MATERIAL 4 4 1 1 6.o- WITH WOOD 6.5 AND LENSES OF SAND 5@3 LOOSE TO MEDIUM LOOSE 5 1 2 3 5 7-5- BROWN fine 6 4 6 6 9-0- q.s SAND z I - 10-5- MEDIUM LOOSE TO LOOSE 7 3 LIGHT BROWN 14-5- 16.0- fine 19. 2.L 0 SAND 9 1 M22 Boring Continued on Page 2) "PP- 2WQ0Q PMEM4T70N M=7A@CE FROjECZ Small Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan FROJECT No. 6 0 - 0 7 8 5 CL.IENr. Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. CLJENT'S FROJELT IYO __Lo M%31@ 047E =ww_L12@L8 5 DATE 0CmRE7W 7/29/85 S. De Weese -HELJDER R. Burmeister PLUGGIIYG IWET?40 Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 5655 4eth St., S.E., Grand Rapids, Ml 49508 616-634-8277 AA6, AAA Aft SCRING M 3 (Page 2 of 2) SURFACE ELEV Sgi-h U. of to N DESCRIMON 1 2 3 2 L.L a LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE 24-5- LIGHT EROWN 26. 0-* fine 28.5 30-0130.01 SAND jDA60 p0maram @MEW& FROJECT-Sma 1.1 Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan PROJECT No. 60-0785 .@ a 1 1- cuENT Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. 7 lyo. CUENT t FpOjEL OWE SMRTED 7 / 2 9 / 8 5 L)A7-E WwFLETED 7/29/85 OPIL-W, --L-/ DREISr, S - De Weese HELPER R. Burmeister rlJJGGM A4ElH0V- Na tura I So i I Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 48th St., S.E., Grand Rapids, M 1 49508 616-534-8277 ILA- IL. AA" qam. BMING NC2 4 (Page I of 2) SURFACE ELEV 588.5 DE-90RIPTM ty 0. 1 2 3 F:>U I L 5 BROWN SANDY GRAVEL '11 3 5 6 7 n BLALK ORGANIC SAND 2t!@ - MEDIUM LOOSE 2 18 7 7 3.0 3. 5 BROWN fine SAND 2@ 4. @- LOOSE ORGANIC MATERIAL 3 5.0 WITH LENSES OF SAND 5. 5 My @= BROWN finp ';AN 3 1 1 6.0- VtKY LUU:)t ULALK UKUANIL 5AND # 6.S WITH SOME GRAVEL 2E -_ 7.5- VERY STIFF 5 5 10 16 BROWN 6 5 9 10 9.3 9-0- c).3 CLAY 77 10.5- STIFF L7 BROWN SILTY 14.5 -IS-0 CLAY n5z 16. 0 MEDIUM DENSE TO MEDIUM LOOSE 8 BROWN 19.5- fine 21.0 SAND P4 T66 I.- F Boring Continued on Page 2 XWgon PEwTgAnm =7wcE FRO.j Cr Small Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan -PROJECT NO. 60-0785 L_Ak APMP CUENT Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. CLJffYTt PROUOr IYO. [email protected]'j ?rM 7 /29/F5 D47E SW DATE CCMFLETED 7/29/85 j)Rg.LEp S. De Weese HELFER R Burmeister PLUGGIMMETHO Natural Soil 'Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 4sth St., S.E., Grand Rapids, M 1 49508 616-534-8277 Aw- AA- & JL ;A AM a.AAL a&;. aim -4, 4 (Page 2 of 2) SLjRFAcE ELEv 538.5 u- r- N zl. 0 A DE9CRIPTK)N 1 2 3 -7-"T--l MEDIUM LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE 24-5- BROWN LO 26.0- fi-ne 28.5 SAND 30. 01 30. 01 FROJECT Small Craft Harbor Ludington, MichiQan PROJECT NO, 60-0785 r.- 12 17 CLJENTI Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. Cufffrt RWXXTT No Davrl# DA7E 57AI(rt -. 7/29/85 04TE(DUR =1EX, 7/29/85 DRI_LE.rq S. De Weese -HELJ:ER R. Burmeister pLUGGlrqG METHOD_ Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 48th St_ S.E., Grand Rapids, 1 49508 616-534-8277 j. A@ - - oi BMING NQ 5 (Page I of 2) suRmcE ELEv 582.3 Iq 0 Ov, DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 WHITE GRAVELLY SAND 1 3 1 7 BLACK ORGANIC MATERIAL 2 16 11 16 3.0- 3 5 6 5 4.5- WITH 6.0- 5.9 WOOD 5 26 5 6 4 2 7.5- WOOD 9.0- 10.5- VERY LOOSE GREY 14.5- 16.0- fine 19.5 SAND 21.0 7 1 f or 18" Boring Continued on Page 2 =Noon PFNETR4T?orq =TANcE A?OJECT ___Lma I I C ra f t Ha rbo rLudington, Michigan PROJECT NO. 60-0785 CLi7lqT Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. CUENTIS FROJECT NO.- r 0/85 WWFLEM 7/30/85 lVj.V DAM =RTED--M DRUE17% S. De Weese -HELPER R. Burmeister f-l-UGGINGMETHOO_ Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 4ath St., S.E., Grand Rapids, M 1 49508 616-534-8277 t BGRING M 5 (Page 2 of 2) 0 P SURFACE ELEV 582.3 LL DEMRIMM 1 2 3 1. 0 a 9- @ o@@@ -7-7@@ VERY LOOSE GREY fine SAND MEDIUM STIFF 24.5 GREY CLAY 26.0 WITH 8 A TRACE OF SILT 77.01 MEDIUM STIFF 28.5 GREY SANDY 9 30.0 110-0 CLAY FROjECr Small Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan -o78r - PROJECT r4o. 6o IL Cl-ENT Consulting Engineering Associates, Inc. CUUqTt PROJECr f4O Vl.Mtjlw OWE SMITrED 7 L3 08 5 DATE CCmFLETED 7/30/85 DRXLER_L S- De Weese HELPER R. Burmeister PLILWING IWETHOD- Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 4sth St., S.E., Grand Rapids, Y1 49508 616-534-8277 A@ @011 ii- raw., BORING Na 6 (Page I of 2) SURFACE ELEV 582. O� N 1 2 3 0. WHITE 1 2 6 14 1-5- medium to coarse 2.4 GRAVEL AND LIMESTONE X37 6 5 NOTE A: 3.0 5- V w 2 MEDIUM LOOSE DARK BROWN ---- fine SAND WITH SOME ORGANIC 2 4 4 MATERIAL AND WOOD 4.5' LOOSE 31 5 1 DARK BROWN 4 14 4 5 6.01 fine SAND 7.0 WITH WOOD 4 3 4 7.5 7.6 wnnn 9.0 LOOSE 6 13 3 3 10.5 BROWN fine 14.5 1S.0 SAND VERY LOOSE I for 12" 16.o BLACK 8 SANDY SILTY ORGANIC MATERIAL LOOSE 9. 5 GREY fine SAND 21.0 WITH A TRACE OF ORGANIC MAT'L-[9 11 M24 Boring Continued on Page 2 57ANgon PENETRAPON =WCE R?OJE,17-2mall Craft Harbor Ludington. Michican PROJECT NO. An-n785_ Do, F--Fw CLIF'P,--,___Co.nsultinq_En-,iaeerinq Associates, Inc. DME =RrED--2LjQL8 CtANT13 MOJECT NO. DATE COWRXTED 7 / 3 0 8 5 L-iRLLER S. De Weese HELF;ER R. Burmeister PLUGGIM hIETHO0 Natural Soil Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 48th St., S.E., Grand Rapids, M 1 49 608 616-534-8277 6 (Page 2 of 2) SURFACE ELEV 582.0� U. 21.0 DEMRIMM 1 2 3 LOOSE GREY fine SAND 2 WITH TRACE-OF ORGAN-IC MATFRIAl 24.5- LOOSE BROWN fine 10 26.0- SAND ?7 n WITH A TRACE OF SILT MEDIUM LOOSE 28.5 BROWN fine 11 4 6 7 30.0 30.0 SAND old#- MNOAM FROjE(,T Small Craft Harbor Ludington, Michigan -PROJECT No. 60-0785 Z @2 CUEK Consulting Engineering A sociates, Inc. CLIENTS FROJEcr 1yo. oar,"M DAM SMRrED-L 7./-30/85 DATE WWRETM 7/30/85 I)RrajcR S. De Weese HELpER R. Burmeister FV_UGGjjyG IWETHOD Natural Soil VISUAL GOLDR CONSISTENCY OR k6LATIVE D6451" GUN SIZE IDeMFICATION UNIFIED SOIL CIASSIF7GA77ON !n * m C) MINOR M4TERIAL C-7 .0- DEpm (SrANDMD 0 MA JOR MATERIAL PENETWION CL 0 ID co rn SAMPLE NUM BE? NUMBER CF BLDWS CORE MILUNG U4- WATM LEVEL SHaBY TUBE 90rRE SAWLE LINER S4MPLE SAMPLE DISCARDED 4:- A' SrR4" CHAtM -J r: Grand Rapids Testing Service 565 48th St., S.E., Grand Rapids, M 1 49508 616-534-8277 A A- - - A; xv RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY TABLE Sand and Silt, Relative Density Consistency of Clay No. of blows req'd No. of blows req'd to drive a sampler to drive a sampler I ft. using a 140# 1 ft. using a 140# hammer failing 30" RELATIVE hammer failing 3011 CONSISTENCY DENSITY 2" 0. D. 2" O.D. Samplers Samplers <4 Very Loose <2 Very Soft 4-10 Loose 2-4 Soft 10-30 Medium 4-8 Medium 30-50 Dense 8-15 Stiff >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very Stl ff >30 Hard IAJLA APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES FOR THE PROPOSED WASHINGTON AVENUE MARINA ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE IN THE CITY OF LUDINGTON Preliminary Cost Estimates The following cost estimates were prepared for the four alternative schemes shown in Appendix C for the proposed Washington Avenue Marina Site. Each of the following estimates includes the costs for all the principal items of work which are identifiable during this preliminary study, except for any costs associated with acquistion of the site. The unit prices and job costs used in the following estimates represent 1985 price levels and are intended to represent the in-place value for each of the items of work listed. The construction cost determined for each scheme is not intended to represent the lowest price that might be expected if the project were bid in 1985, but rather a price somewhere between the low and average of all bids. These estimated construction costs are intended for comparative purposes only and would require adjustment for a future construction date. B-1 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR PROPOSED RECREATIONAL BOAT HARBOR ON PERE MARQUETrE LAKE SCHEME I UNIT (1) ITEMS CF WORK UNIT QUANTITIES PRICES AMOUNTS 1. Demolition & Clearing job $ 32,000 2. Excavation C.Y. 113,290 4.00 453,200 3. Revet Mttress S.Y. 7,300 25-00 182,500 4. Riprap C.Y. 720 21.00 15,100 5. Floating Docks S.F. 11,220 23.00 258,100 6. Dock Anchorage System job 15,400 7. Dock Office job 2,000 8. Thilet & Shower Bldg. S.F. 1,000 75.00 75,000 9. Paved Foads & Parking S.Y. 1,830 8.50 15,600 10. Concrete Walk S.Y. 435 16.00 7,000 11. Sodding S.Y. 2,960 2.50 7,400 12. Topsoil & Seeding S.Y. 3,900 .65 2,500 13. Landscaping job 2,500 14. Electrical Service job 100,000 15. Water Service Job 27,500 16. Sanitary Pumpout System job 5,000 17. Sanitary Sewer job 11,000 Construction Cbst $1,211,800 Contingencies 121,700 Engineering 77,500 TOTAL PRDJBCT COST (2) $1,411,000 (1) rounded to nearest 100 dollars (2) does not include land acquisition PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR PROPOSED RECREATIONAL BOAT HARBOR ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE SCHEME 11 UNIT (1) ITEMS CF WORK UNIT QUANTITIES PRICES AMOUNTS 1. Demolition & Clearing Job $ 32,000 2. Excavation C.Y. 103,570 4.00 414,300 3. Revet Mattress S.Y. 3,735 25.00 93,400 4. Gabion Retaining Structure L.F. 580 250-00 145,000 5. Riprap C.Y. 80 30.00 2,400 6. Floating Docks S.F. 12,103 23.00 278,400 7. Dock Anchorage System Job 17,600 8. Dock office Job 2,000 9. Toilet & ShovRr Bldg. S.F. 1,000 75.00 75,000 10. Paved lbads & Parking S.Y. 7,825 8.50 66,500 11. Concrete Walk S.Y. 695 16.00 11,100 12. Sodd ing S. Y. 2,540 2.50 6,400 13. Topsoil & Seeding S.Y. 6,470 .65 4,200 14. landscaping Job 2,500 15. Electrical Service Job 122,000 16. Water Service Job 25,200 17. Sanitary Sewer Job 7,000 18. Sanitary PLnpout Job 6,500 Construction Gost $1,311,500 Contingencies 130,900 Engineering 82,600 TOTAL PROJECT COST (2) $1,525,000 (1) rounded to nearest 100 dollars (2) does not include land acquisition PRELI14INARY COST ESTIMATE FOR PROPOSED RECREATIONAL BOAT HARBOR ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE SCHEME III ITEMS OF WORK UNIT (1) UNIT QUANTITIES PRICES AMOUNTS 1. Demolition & Clearing Job $ 32,000 2. Excavation C.Y. 101,432 4.00 405,700 3. Pevet Mattress S.Y. 5,400 25.00 135,100 4. Gabion Retaining Structure L.F. 235 250-00 58,800 5. Riprap C.Y. 1,140 20-00 22,800 6. Floating Docks S.F. 11,720 23-00 269,600 7. Dock Anchorage System job 17,000 8. Dock Off ice Job 2,000 9. Toilet & Shower Bldg. S.F. 11000 75-00 75,000 10. Paved lbads & Parking S.Y. 7,245 8.50 61,600 11. Concrete Walk S.Y. 485 16.00 7,800 12. Sodding S.Y. 3,230 2.50 8,100 13. rIbpsoil & Seeding S.Y. 4,000 .65 2,600 14. Landscaping Job 2,500 15. Electrical Service Job 112,000 16. Water Service Job 27,200 17. Sanitary Sewer Job 32,400 18. Sanitary Pumpout System Job 4,000 19. Sanitary Lift Station job 24,200 Construction Cost $1,300,300 Contingencies 130,600 Engineering(3) 82,100 TOTAL PROJECT COST (2) $1,513,000 (1) rounded to nearest 100 dollars (2) does not include land acquistion (3) does not include additional field work that may not be required PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR PROPOSED RECREATIONAL BOAT HARBOR ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE SCHM IV UNIT (1) ITEMS OF WORK UNIT QUANTITIES PRICES AMOUNTS 1. Demolition & Clearing Job $ 32,000 2. Excavation C. Y. 111,055 4.00 444,200 3. Pevet Mattress S. Y. 3,700 25.00 92,500 4. Stone Breakwater C.Y. 3,705 30.00 111,200 5. Steel Sheet Piling L.F. 135 450.00 60,800 6. Gabion Retaining Structure C.Y. 1,560 60-00 93,600 7. Floating Docks S.F. 27,500 23.00 632,500 8. Dock Anchorage System Job 32,200 9. Bock Of f ice Job 2,000 10. Toilet & Shower Building S.F. 1,500 75.00 112,500 11. Paved Roads & Paving S.Y. 3,690 8.50 31,400 12. Sodding S.Y. 1,540 2.50 3,900 13. Concrete Walk S.Y. 430 16.00 6,900 14. T:)psoil & Seeding S. Y. 1,500 .65 1,000 15. Landscaping Job 2,500 16. Electrical Service Job 160,000 17. Water Service Job 33,300 18. Sanitary Siewer Job 5,000 19. Sanitary Pumpout Job 7,700 Construction Cost $1,865,200 Contingencies 183,400 Engineering (3) 111,400 TO`rAL PROJECT COST (2) $2,160,000 (1) rounded to nearest 100 dollars (2) does not include land acquistion (3) does not include additional field work that may be required APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED WASHINGTON AVENUE MARINA ON PERE MARQUETTE LAKE IN THE CITY OF LUDINGTON Plate Title Cl Plan of Site and Underground Utilities C2 General Plan - Scheme I C3 General Plan - Scheme II C4 General Plan - Scheme III C5 General Plan - Scheme IV C-1 TO LUOINSTOM YACHT Cue LUI Q LUI I UT BOAT LAUNCHING RAMP 131P --sft- pp p PETER COPEYON PARK 582 CONCRETE FOUNDATION of 594 .;P *PP X Pp I STO Y a SHEET AL ST III CONSUMERS POWER SuB- STATION I ASPHALT FoVEmEmT 1 2 STORY MASONRY "so BUILDING SHELTER-w WOODEN 59 P 604 COMMERC,:S STORY n@RY OING IVERSON PARK Cot C. DRIVE P sa,,_ WASHINGTON-hVj@_YQ@WQ cf)l Lr LL LEGEND jS - - sANIIAR Y -1-1WER bNVM--t -#VA MR MAW f q SITE PLAN -6,45 M411Y e- ---0YtR#,FAV 4&ZWRAC go 290 r- -0 ICRNAFAD MEAOW@ 0 AMAJA00LE opp &WrRIC AME ;TP r4f4ePA"Lr P04E BORAva LOCAMW PAL/AG ?V L40AAAWW LU2 Isl YAcoff e4do LU2 ISI x /s r1l va 8OAr Wgqg- ,@'z TY 4-13 ah 45' 14 tA I @Z 7/0" K 7',5ZLOW IG.L.D. --&6 -S rA 45EIWv I i - 6.4. -SOD __j .5 rolq y caAsWVC1AIL,& H RVIAU IVERSON PARK WA,51-111',IGTOAI AVE. 70'WD U) SCHEME GENERAL PLAN TO.... 5p. Cxlsrllva ZOAT AAMA rollEr -ShOWER BIDG AL-AER Ca0-=YOA1 Wn hORAP PARK /0 sz/ps -Boa'_ 45 Or7oM OF BASM 7'6&.OW LAMM A -S-ACE.S M 4e 3 20' 30' itz- AZOA /0 !P Z 4' 3640' -,e16-STA710A1 -SOD 51-ORr A&WVA' IRVIAG NER56W PARK WA -5 /-///VG TON A VE. 70' WD U) 2c3 SCHEME]a GENERAL PLAN IT'.... 5p too 270 401AAWW Ixlsrllva A50AT RAMP :5FrIFFr, ),r (6&ON 14SLD)@ PARA: 45 w w, 66, 4e 4ff oe %A ;n 1-51 in Al, Wb -$;'A r/0" Mink 5 7OR YY cawmc,Ai. aL IRYIIW IVSR-50M AARK WA31-11AJGTOAI AVE. 70 wo C2 T) SCHEME IM GENERAL PLAN 1010.... 5p. too ,C44WAASIW LU?- S4 LU2 134 IFX /S rIlva SOAr RAMP ROCK FILLED 6Adb/&W WAILL rovz 6REAKWArZe W olLOA //%or- TOM Oe 6A-,W -T'MLO W ZM TZ RA M /< +4 . . . . . .. .......i X-1 IIA 7',',Va RIAV ki 4, "1 "WE', FT I T70MAr,8AShV 7 6ELOW DAMM SOLKREAD WAL4 E@ ars" 2r. Saps -.6eo, A +4 Lj 1U)A r/vis 70 IN-11, . . .. .. .. . rj CaV5LIA-'E,e,oow.e,e -W S L IRS 529r -US -S;IA 710" A5017,Ohf O.C &ASIN in ff'&ELIOW OArilm ,u --ROCK F11 LED CA 8 /DA/ RFrAINWAS WA4,L f 5TORY A"54VR caimERchu- aL IRYIA6 IVERSON RARK WA3H1"GrON AVE. M'WD SCHEMETZ GENERAL PLAN 100 ASII @@@15,2112W DaAr", I i i i . I I I I I i i I I I i I I A I immillovillill t @ 3 6668 14102 9902