[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
worfr work product 5ok @sk ockingham Planning 121 Water Street, Exeter, N.H. 03833-2487 Commission 603-778-0885 INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF LAND AND WATER RESOURCES IN THE SQUANSCOTT RIVER CORRIDOR Newfields, NH June 1993 DRAFT Atkinson Brentwood Danville East Kingston Epping Exeter Fremont Greenland Hampstead Hampton Hampton Falls -@;epcl Kingston New Castle Newfields - Newington - Newton - North Hampton Plaistow - Porstmouth Rye Salem Sandown Seabrook South Hampton Stratham Windham INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF LAND AND WATER RESOURCES IN THE SQUANSCOTT RIVER CORRIDOR Newfields, NK June 1993 DRAFT Prepared by: Rockingham Planning Commission 121 Water Street Exeter, IM 03833 This document was financed in part by a grant from the Office of State Planning, Now Hampshire Coastal Program, as authorized by the National Oceanic and Atmospher Administration (NOAA), Award Number XA170ZO311-01. -7j.. so ri TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................... 1 overview of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ............... 3 III. Description of Inventory Layers A. Base Layer ............................................... 3 B. Property Boundaries ....................................... 3 C. Flood Hazard Areas ....................................... 4 D. Wetlands - Soil Based .................................... 5 E. Soil Suitability for Septic Systems ........................ 5 F. Existing Land Use ........................................ 6 G. Zoning ................................................... 6 IV. GIS-Based Analysis A. Identification and Analysis of Protected .................. 7 B. Analysis of "Current Use" Lands .......................... 8 C. Zoning Overlay Districts ................................. 8 V. Conclusion and Recommendations ................................. 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Flood Hazard Areas ................................ 4 Table 2 Wetland Areas ..................................... 5 Table 3 Existing Land Use ................................. 6 Table 4 Conventional Zoning Districts ..................... 8 Table 5 Protected Lands ................................... 9 Table 6 Current Use Parcels ............................... 9 LIST OF MAPS Number/Title Nap Sheet/Panel Map I Town of Newfields Base Map ........................ Map 2 Study Area Boundaries .............................. Map 3 Tax Parcel Boundaries .............................. Map 4 Flood Hazard ....................................... Map 5 Soil Based Wetlands ................................ Map 6 Soil Suitability for Septic Systems ............... Map 7 Existing Land Use ................................. Map 8 Zoning Districts .................................. Map 9 Protected Land .................................... Map 10 Development Suitability and Existing Land Use ..... Map 11 Development Suitability and conventional Zoning Districts .................................. Map 12 Analysis of Protected Land ......................... APPENDIX 1 & 2 Squamscott River Corridor Study, Newfields: Parcel Summary Appendix 1 : Land Use, Current Use, and Protected Category Appendix 2 : Zoning Classification I. INTRODUCTION This project was designed to develop a series of natural and cultural resource inventories and analysis maps for the Squamscott River corridor in:the Town of Newfields, NH. The purpose was, in part, to develop the capability to easily overlay, interrelate and analyze the information contained in the inventory maps. The information is intended to be used on an ongoing basis to evaluate the adequacy of existing land use regulations in protecting coastal resources and to identify and prioritize environmentally sensitive areas for future land acquisitions. The information developed for this project is consistent with that developed for two previous projects carried out under the Coastal Program. The projects, entitled Inventory and Analysiff of Land and Water Resources in Sauamscott River Corridor -- Stratham, NH, June 1990, and Inventory and Analysis of Land and Water Resources in the Scruamscott River Corridor -- Exeter, NH, 1991. The resource information presented in the Stratham, Exeter and Newfields projects can be combined into a single coverage to show corridor resources in a larger geographic area. Corridor maps developed with the GIS in Greenland, Newington, Portsmouth, Durham, Dover and Madbury, if developed, could likewise be combined into single coverages of the entire corridor of the Squamscott River and Great Bay. The principal user of the information presented in this study will be the Town of Newfields. other users may include the N.H. Coastal Program, the Wetlands Board, Port Authority, Fish and Game Department, and the Rockingham Planning Commission, as well as other agencies and groups that have an interest in coastal resource issues. Within the Town it is likely that both the Planning Board and Conservation Commission will use the data and maps. The Ndwfields Conservation Commission has indicated its intention to develop a town- wide GIS-based Bet of natural resource coverages. Many of the same coverages that created for this report will be created on a town-wide basis in the Conservation Commissions study. Project Setting The Great Bay and its tidal rivers make up one of the most important estuarine environments on the eastern Beaboard of the United States. In 1988 the U.S. Office of Coastal Resources Management (OCRM) designated the Squamecott River and its immediate shoreline environment as part of the "second tier" coastal zone in New Hampshire. In the following year, the Great Bay, including the lower reaches of the Squamecott, was accepted as a National Estuarine Research Reserve, part of a national Bystem of 17 important estuaries. One of the reasons that the estuary was eligible for Research Reserve designation was that its shoreline and near shore areas remain relatively undeveloped. Newfields, which covers about half of the Western shore of the Squamscott River has been fortunate to have made it through the 1980's with much less impact from development than was the experience of most of the neighboring communities. Between 1970 and 1990 the Town's population grew from 843 to 888, an annual growth rate of less than 1%. However, since 1953 the land consumed for development has displayed a much more dramatically shift. In 1953 approximately 8% of the Town's land area was classified as "developed". By 1982 that figure had grown to 32.4% -- a four fold increase. Development has occurred in many areas of Newf ields during this period. Fortunately the shoreline of the Squamscott has been relatively untouched by the development. This can be attributed partly to the physical attributes of the land and partly to the Town's zoning land use regulations. Much of the shorelands are wet and poorly suited to development; the B* & M railroad lies between the Newf ields Road and the shoreline and acts as an access barrier to the river. The Town has acted in the last five years to adopt shoreline protection and wetlands protection zoning districts. To supplement these ordinances, the Town saw the benefits in develop a complete and permanent information base of the natural features, land uses and property ownership patterns in the river corridor. This information is needed to better support the rational basis for existing regulations, to identify the need to add to or strengthen regulations, and to identify and justify the future acquisition of environmentally sensitive areas. The Newfields Planning Board and the Rockingham Planning Commission jointly proposed a project to utilize the RPC's Geographic Information System (CIS) to build such an information base.' The principal product would include a set of digitized map overlays ("coverages") of natural resource feature and property information. The purpose of developing the information base using a CIS is threefold: 1) to make the information "permanent" and easy to update; 2) to facilitate the analysis of land use and resource information, and; 3) to demonstrate to the Town of Exeter the techniques, information requirements, benefits and problems associated with using the CIS in resource analyses. Study,Area The study area encompasses an irregular area VARYING IN DISTANCE FROM APPROXIMATELY 6000 to 10,600 feet upland and westward from the river's edge. The area is bounded by the Newmarket town line to the north, the Squamscott River to the east and an abandoned AT&T telephone transmission line to the west. The study area is approximately 1600 acres in size and makes up about 31% of Newfields' total land area (see Map 2 - Study Area). All of the study area is located within Squamscott River Watershed. The Squamscott watershed is relatively small in area totalling about 12,000 acres, The river has a legislative classification of "B" (fishable, swimmable). The shoreline of the Squamscott is relatively undeveloped in Newfields. It is a high quality estuarine environment and supports highly valued habitat which is utilized by several threatened and endangered plant and animal species including the bald eagle, common loon and four-toed salamander. Ii. OVERVIEW OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM A Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computer based mapping and planning tool. It combines spatial information such as parcel boundaries (polygons), river shorelines (lines), or well locations (points), with attribute data such as property owners, water quality class, and soil types. Each set of information is entered and stored 2 in its own data layer or "coverage" which is referenced to an external coordinate system and base layer. This enables the user to query the system about a particular map feature, to combine layers, or to generate new layers based on selected attributes from several different layers. The GIS system also enables a user to generate buffer zones around parti@ular features, such as setbacks along roads or shorelines. one of its-most useful features for planning is the ability to overlay different layers of information obtained from sources at different scales. These features are intended to be used both interactively on the computer screeni' and to produce high quality plots for presentation and other purposes. III. DESCRIPTION OF DATA LAYERS This study was designed to use readily available map sources including digitized and hard copy, in compiling the GIS coverages. The best available base map, especially in terms of geographic reference to the state plane coordinate system, was determined to be 7.5" U.S.G.S. quad maps (Newmarket, Exeter). All other map sources were scaled or recompiled to fit this base map. A. Bass Layer (Maps 1 and 2) The base layer for the study area was digitized by the Rockingham Planning Commission from the Newmarket, Exeter, 1:24,000 USGS 7.5 minute quadrangles. These quadrangles are printed on a stable mylar material for accuracy. Information shown on USGS quads and included on the base map consists of water bodies, streams, roads, railways and political boundaries. There were few problems encountered when compiling this layer due to the accuracy of the source information and uniform reference to the State plane coordinate system. Map sections from the two quads matched without difficulty. B. ,Property Boundaries (Map 3) Information for this layer was digitized from the Newfields tax maps (original vellum set) which are produced at scales of 1 inch equals 100 feet and 1 inch equals 200 feet. The parcels shown on Map 3 represent the subdivision of land in the study area as shown on the current tax maps. The maps were last updated in April 1992. Although Newfields' tax maps are referenced to the State plane coordinate system, the scales used made direct conversion somewhat inaccurate. This means that a relatively high level of error in spatial accuracy exists between the USGS quad based layers and the tax parcel layer. For example, when the tax parcel coverage is combined with the road and stream layers the "fit" is not very good. Extensive manipulation ("rubber- sheet ing") of the parcel coverages was required to make a suitable match and consequently result was a much less accurate representation of tax parcels. The greatest difficulty in combining USGS and property tax maps in Newfielde's case was in resolving the differences in scale. The USGS maps are at 1:24000 scale, while the tax maps are at 1:2400 and 1:1200 scale -- 10 to 20 times greater. Typically this means that some of the detail in features (especially roads, streams and shorelines) was absent from the USGS map. For example, a stream segment appearing as a straight line on the USGS may actually have a number of bends are revealed on the tax maps. 3 It is important to note that much of the resource data overlaid with the tax parcel information was not designed to be used on small scale maps (i.e. maps which cover a smaller area and contain greater detail) such as tax maps. Combining parcel and soils data is particularly troublesome because the soil maps do not appear to be referenced to State plane coordinates. Also the soils data is relatively low resolution information, not meant to resolve soil areas smaller than one to two acres. Due to the difference in scale and the lack of common State plane reference for the soils and flood hazard coverages, it is not possible to accurately locate streams, soil types, flood hazard areas, and other physical features in relation to the tax parcels shown. Roads and streams can be located with relatively high confidence; soils and flood hazard locations have relatively low confidence. Despite the accuracy limitations, the combination of tax parcel coverages with physical feature coverages can produce valuable planning and analysis maps at a town wide scale. They can show, for example, the relative suitability of land for development in an area of town and simultaneously show the distribu- tion and use of properties in the same area. They can also be used to identify properties that are located within defined zones and/or are subject to wetland, shoreline or flood hazard restrictions. Appendix 1 and 2 contains a listing of all tax parcels included in the study area. The tax parcel ID number shown in the listing is referenced to the Tax Parcel Index Map (Map 3). Also shown for each parcel is the total acreage current Use and protected land status, land use category, zoning district. It is important to note that due to the inaccuracies of the source data, this information layer shows only the approximate location of the property boundaries in relation to the USGS base layer. It is not possible to precisely locate the position of streams, soil types, or other physical features in relation to the tax parcels shown. Where the tax parcel layer is combined with a layer showing physical features it is done only to show the approximate spatial relationships between them. Despite the limited accuracy of this information it can serve as a useful planning tool at a town wide scale. Features from different sources but that are referenced to the state plane coordinate system (e.g. parcels, roads, streams) are represented more accurately that ones that aren't (e.g. soils and flood hazard areas). C. Flood Hazard Areas (Map 4) This layer is based on the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood insurance rate maps for the Town of Exeter (dated May 17, 1982); these maps are at a scale of 1:1200 and were digitized by the RPC. Table 1 Flood Hazard Areas Acres % of Study Area "Zone A" (100 year floodplain) 4 "Zone B" (500 year floodplain) TOTAL When overlaid with the base layer, the flood hazard area appeared to match poorly with common features. The location of flood areas were consistent with stream channel and shoreline location but their shapes were considerably distorted. Inconsistencies were corrected in favor of the base layer. There are approximately 1110.5 acres in the flood hazard Zone A (100 year flood plain) within the study area. This represents 19.9% of the study area. D. Soil Based Wetlands (Map 5' ) This layer shows wetland soil types within the study area. The soils information used to produce this layer was digitized by the Complex Systems Research Center at UNH for the Soils Conservation Service (SCS). The data has been made available through the State's GRANIT GIS. CSRC used SCS/Rockingham County Soil Survey maps as their source. The soils were originally mapped from aerial photographs at a scale of 1:20000. A listing of wetland soil types was obtained from the SCS which enabled the GIS to identify the wetland soils by selecting specified soil types in attribute tables. Both poorly and very poorly drained soils are shown. Table 2 below shows the acreages of wetlands within the study area. Table 2 Wetland Areas Soil & Drainage Class Acres % of Study Area Poorly Drained to be recalculated Very Poorly Drained TOTAL Although this information was digitized with very high accuracy, it was found that this layer does not correspond well with the USGS base layer. This is because the 1:20000 aerial photographs themselves show considerable distortion relative to the base layer. Problems are most evident at town boundaries, shoreline boundaries and rivers. It would be difficult to correct these kinds of differences due to the fundamental differences in the source maps. Correcting the problem would require a re-compilation of the soils data on the USGS -- a process of unknown feasibility. Despite these inaccuracies, as with property boundaries, the soils layer remains an invaluable planning tool and a critical component of the GIS-based inventory. E. soils suitability for Septic Systems (Map 6) This layer is based on the soils information prepared by Complex Systems 5 Research Center and made available through GRANIT. The GIS system identified soils and their suitability for septic systems based upon the report. "Soils Potential for Development" (Soil Conservation Services and Rockingham County Conservation District, May 1987).@ As can be seen-from the map, most of the study area is of medium,;potential to handle on site septic systems. A large portion of the Town Center is detailed as not rated due to Newfields' sewer district. F. Existing Land Use (Kap 7) The existing land use layer was digitized by the RPC from mylar copies of the town tax maps at scales of one inch to 100 feet (1:1200) and one inch to 200 feet (1:2400). This information was provided on a parcel by parcel review of existing use through the efforts of the Planning Board and Board of Selectmen. This enables the map to be much more up-to-date than it would have otherwise been using the standard procedure of digitizing dated aerial photography to establish this coverage. The following table shows the acreage of the different land uses: Table 3 Existing Land Use Category Acres of Study Area Residential 677.40 41.5% .1dommercial 56.46 3.5% Industrial 39.20 2.4% Agricultural 37.80 2.3% Town/Government 51.03 3.1% Cemetery 5.20 .3% Woodlot 115.00 9.5% Open Space 615.29 37.7% TOTAL '1559.58 100.3% The study area is a fairly diverse environment as shown by the existing land use figures detailed on Table 5. For a community of Newfields' size this part of Town has a good mix of land uses. It is important to note that although the study area encompasses the Town center, over one-third of the study area is categorized as open space. G. Zoning (Kap 8) As shown in Table 4, the study area includes 4 different conventional zoning districts. The boundaries shown were digitized from the Town's current zoning map (current through May, 1993) and adjusted to the study area base map as necessary to conform to physical features defined in the zone descriptions. 6 Two of the districts are predominantly residential in nature. The "R" zone or residential is by far the largest zone in the study area encompassing over 900 acres. The "R/A" zone (residential/ agricultural) is the second largest zoning district within the study area with over 260 acres represented. Together with the residential zone these two districts comprise 80% of the study area. The study area also comprises just under 150 acres of industrial land as well as almost 100 acres of commercially zoned land. Table 4 Conventional Zoning Districts Zone Acres of Study Area R Residential 918.1 64.42 R/A Residential Agricultural 261.4 18.34 C Commercial 93.7 6.57 I Industrial 148.3 10.40 TOTAL 1421.5 99.73 Excludes Water bodies IV. GIS-BASED ANALYSIS once the basic coverages of roads, hydrology, soils, wetlands, flood hazards, and property boundaries are prepared, numerous analyses of the information can be performed using the GIS. An analysis can be simple or complex. A simple analysis might,,* include the overlaying of two coverages to compare areas in common. For exam ple, existing land uses could be combined with zoning districts to determine areas where they conflict. A complex analysis might involve the display of features from multiple coverages which match a complex set of criteria. Only a few of the analyses possible using the available information are included here. Many others can be created as the need arises. The foll owing analyses maps were prepared for this study: Identification and Analysis of Protected Land (Map 9 and 12); Development suitability and existing land use (Map 10); Combination of Development Suitability and Conventional Zoning Districts Map 11); A. Identification and Analysis of Protected Lands (Kap 9) As shown in Table 5 below, 152 acres or slightly less than one-ten of the study area is classified as protected land. Protected land in the case of this study refers to those lands, either publicly or privately owned, with very low potential to be further developed. 7 In the case of the privately owned lands within the study area, only two parcels are included on the protected parcels map (Map 10) Both parcels are owned by the Society for the protection of new Hampshire Forests. One of the parcels is the George F. Smith Woodlot. The publicly owned parcels are all owned by the Town of Newfield@. There are 8 parcels making up the 70 acres. The lots range in size from 1.01 to 37 acres. Table 5 Protected Lands % of Protected Land Category Acres Study Area Town Owned 70.45 4.3% Private 82.00 5.0% TOTAL 152.45 9.3% B. Analysis of "Current Use" Lands Over 37% of the 1631 acres of the study area are in parcels registered with the Assessors office as current use or open space land. Under the provisions of the current use statute (RSA 79A), these parcels may not be developed or changed from their open space use without the payment of a land use change tax equal to 10% of the full market value. This would indicate that a substantial portion of the open areas presently found within the study area is susceptible to future development pressure and is not in any way protected from conversion to more intensive land uses. Table 6 Current Use Parcels Acres % of Study Area All Current Use 617.40 37.9% C. Zoning overlay Districts (Kaps 4, 5, 8) Many communities in New Hampshire use "overlay" zoning districts for wetlands, shoreline and other sensitive area protection measures. In many cases, the areas covered by individual overlay districts overlap. This phenomenon can be seen by looking at the soils based wetlands map, the flood hazard boundary map and the zoning map. On each of these maps the surface water resources within 8 the Town affect the boundaries of the different protection measures. Map displays the overlap that exists when Soil-based development suitability is overlaid upon the Towns zoning districts.The overlap is especially evident between the LC zone and septic system potentials ratings. V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This project, along with the Stratham and Exeter portions before it, have demonstrated that a variety of existing natural and cultural resource information can be combined effectively with a CIS to inventory and analyze coastal resources. The scale and accuracy of the data makes the inventory useful for town-wide and river corridor wide planning purposes. It is not appropriate, however, for site specific analysis. Among the specific conclusions that can be drawn from the project are the following: 1. Although existing mapped resource information has a variety of sources and scales, it can be successfully compiled using a CIS to create a useful and effective resource information base and planning tool. 2. Combining property tax maps and physical feature maps generates useful planning information and is among the most useful parts of the database. However, if used incorrectly, it is potentially misleading since the scale and geographic detail of the property information is not comparable to those other map sources. The use of this information should therefore be limited to town-wide or corridor-wide planning purposes. Any conclusions drawn from the data about specific lot conditions should be field verified. 3. The geographic inaccuracy of Newfields' tax maps makes site specific analysis ,.suspect if diligent effort to check actual on-site characteristics is not undertaken. This study can be helpful in displaying to the Town the benefits to be garnered by investing in tax maps closely tied to the State Plane Coordinate system. 4. Considerable distortion exists between the USGS or Tax Maps and Soils and Flood Hazard base maps. Displacement of features is a common problem with both the sails and flood hazard data. Caution should be used in combining information from these layers. The Flood Hazard Maps are particularly distorted and require substantial manipulations to "fit" with State Plane referenced coverages. 5. Newfields, existing zoning ordinances (including overlay districts) appear to adequately protect environmentally sensitive areas from development. No substantial change is warranted in the Town's ordinances from the standpoint of resource protection. The Town of Newfields is currently expanding its use of CIS technology. When plans can be finalized the Town intends on using the Geographic Information System to complete a natural resource inventory for the entire community. It is anticipated that additional resource coverages such as aquifers, areas with threatened or endangered species, and public access sites along the Squamscott River be included in that study. Such a -program is a 1ogical extension of the planning process begun with this corridor 9. study. It is recommended that the Town of Newf ields continue to incorporate the GIs as a tool to assist in general planning for resource protection in the study area and elsewhere in Town. Additional analysis of the resource information can be requested of the RPC to assist with specific problems. Further information about this project can be obtained by contacting the Rockingham Planning Commission at 121 Water Street, Exeter, KH 03833; telephone 03-778-0885. 10 STDSPRD2.XLS ON ABBaff, PAMMA S. 102 0.00 0.28 0.3 ABRAHAMSON, LEONARD W. & J. R. 101 17 RES 0.00 1.50 1.8 ADAMS, SANDRA J. 103 22 RES 0.00 0.61 0.5 ANDERSEN, CMUMIAN T. & DONNA M. 207 14 RES 0.001 2.00 2.1 AREND, LAWRENCE R. & PEGGY L. 102 81 RES 0.00 2.00 1.9 BAIER, LYMAN 0. & SHARON H. 102 64 RES 0.00 -0.40 0.4 BATEMAN, VINCENT J., SR. & PAULINE G. 201 21 RES 0.00 1.50 1.4 BEAME, EDWARD B. 102 is RES 0.00 0.45 0.4 BEATrY, DEBORAH J. 102 6 RES 0.00 0.49 0.4 BEATrY, THOMAS N. & MARCIA P. 2041 16 RES 0.00 2.04 2.0 BEDDEB, CYNTIHA S. 203 13 RES 0.00 3.70 3.3 BEGEEBING, ROBERT J. & LINDA A. 101 14. RES 0.00 3.00 2.9 BEHANNA, JAMES IC & CATHERIKE B. 207 18 RES 0.00 2.03 3.1 BERGERON, GLENN A. & DAVID G. 202 26 O/S 0.00 0.33 0.4 BERNIER CORPORAITON 104 22 RES 0.00 0.33 0.3 BERNEER, EDWARD P. & ELAINE M. 104, 15 RES 0.00. 0.23 0.2 BOND, LAWRENCE S. & JENNEE L. 202 2 RES 0.00 2.00 2.1 BONNER, RICHARD E. & SUSAN C. 209 3 RES 0.00 2.03 2.5 BONNER, ROBERT E., JR & JANICE RAE 209 2 RES 0.00 3.06 1.1 BONNER, ROBERT E., SR. 209 4 O/S 0.00 7.40 2.0 BONNER, THE ESTATE OF MYRTLE 104 52, PM 0.00 0.67, 0.7 BOSMN & MAM R-A"O" 201 1 O/S 0.00 3.90 1.7 BOSTON & NUM RAnROAD 201 4 O/S 0.00 3.60 1.0 BOSTON & MAINE RARROAD 202 19 Ols 0.00 1.00 1.0 BOSTON & MAME RAMROAD 202. 21 O/S 0.00 22.00 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RARROAD 202 22 Ols 0.00 25.021 23.6 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 204 1.02 OIS Public 0.00 1.04 0.9 .BRAGG,' WHIJAM C. & MARGARET E. 101 13 RES 0.00 2.39 2.0 BROCKW", LOIS S. 101 15.2 O/S 0.00 4.21 2.8 BROCKWAY, LOIS S. 101 15.1- RES 0.00 3.36 2.6 BROOKE, ANNE P. 102 46 RES 0.00 0.64 0.6 BROOKE, ANNE P. 102 48 O/S 0.00 0.27 0.3 BROOKS, DOROTHY & 203 12 RES 0.00 6.80 8.4 BROOKS, PHELLIPS F. & CYNTIUA E. 203 11 RES 0.00 1.90 2.0 BURN=, HOWARD F. & WENDY L. 104 41. RES 0.00 0.21. 0.2 BUXTON, RAY P. 104 29 RES 0.00 0.26 0.3 BUXTON, RAY P. & EDNA M. 102 63 RES 0.00 0.14 0.1 BUXTON, WILLIAM G. 104 46 RES 0.00 0.00 0.2 BUXTON, WHAJAM G. 104 45 RES 0.001 0.52 0.2 BUXTON, VALLIAM G. 104 441 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 CALKY ASSOCIATES 202 8.2 O/S 0.00 10.00 9.2 CALL, RAYMOND E. & JUDrrH 102 70 RES 0.00 0.25 0.2 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 COM 0.00 9.00 9.3 CASWELL, CUFFORD A. & HAm, juDrrH 103, 18 RES 0.00, 0.24 0.2 CHAFFEE, COLLEEN c. 1041 53 RES 0.00 2.32 2.6 CHAPMAN, MARJORIE 202 to RES 0.00 0.44 0.4 CHENEY, WALTER W. 201 7 O/S 0.00 1.50 0.6 CHIM JOHN A. & DOROTHY P. 102 8 RES 0.00 0.64 0.6 CLAPP, DAVID D. & LINDA B. 204 4 RES 0.00, 1.10 1.1 CLARY, JOANNE J. 202 24 RES 0.001 25.21 20.6 ICLEGG, GORDON & KATHERINE 1 1041 27 RESi 0.001 0.23 Page 1 STDSPRD2.XLS .............. ...... CLUNE, ROBERT 1. 103 16 RES 0.00 0.16 0.1 COES, STEVEN & BETSY ANN 101 9 RES 0.00 1.10 1.1 CONNER BOTTLJNG WORKS 203 17 RES 0.00 0.00 19.8 CONNER, ALFRED, JR. 206 21 VVDL 18.00 19.001 22.3 CONNER, ALFRED, JR. 204 is VVDL 36.00 36.00 35.0 CONNER, THOMAS H. & JEANNE M. 102 11 RES 0.00 0.39 0.4 CORBIN, JUNE L. & CHAMIAN, JOHN 1. 101 19 RES 0.00 0.94 1.1 CME, ARMAND & BARBARA E. 201 11 O/S 0.00, 17.00 21.1 COTE, CHRISTOPHER J. & BRENDA J. 207. 11 RES 0.00 2.20 2.3 CRONSHAW, KENNEM 1041 26 RES 0.00 0.32 0.3 CRONSRAW, WALTER R. & JUUA 101 5 RES 0.00 1.30 0.2 CROSS, ADRIAN & CECILE 101 -16 RES 0.00 1.60 1.5 CROWLEY, PHILIP M. & bLUUA A. 103 17 RES 0.00 0.35 0.3 CUNNINGHAM, CHARLES W. & M. D. 103 12 RES 0.00 0.99 1.3 * & G CONSTRUMON 207. 10 RES 0.00 2.12 2.6 * & G CONSTRUMON 1031 5.3 RES 0.00 2.49 3.0 DALEY, STEPHANY T. 202 19 Com 0.00 2.35 2.2 DALRYMPLE, HERBEItT R. & RACHAEL C. 201 2 O/S 5.50 10.52 4.8 DAVIS, PHMLT A., JR. & ANN W. 204 13 RES 0.00 2.50 2.7 DAWSON, LEE & CWEKLA, KRMTINE 104 38 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 DAWSON, WUJIAM R. & DOROTHY M. 104 431 RES 0.00 0.22 0.2 DE RHAM, M. M. & KULY, BRIAN R. 207 29 RES 0.00 2.94 3.0 DEVANTRY, ROBERT J. & NINA R. 204 9 RES 0.00 1.00 1.0 DEVEREAUX, PAULINE & JOHN 102 31 RES 0.00 0.55 0.5 DLkMENT, JOSEPH & PATTI S. 1021 24 RES 0.00 0.43 0.4 DIMOCK, FREDERICK C. & MAN A. 207 25 RES 0.00 2.02 1.9 DIXON, CARL & KATHLEEN 206 4 RES 0.00 2.70 3.4 DRELICk, JOEL, KAREN & Purm 207 9 O/S 22.00 22.00 0.6 DRINKWATER, GEORGE H. & TONI 102 50 RES 0.00 0.10 0.1 DUMAIS, MONICA & ROY, ALFRED L. & 202 231 O/S 0.00 9.90 7.6 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 27 RES 0.00 2.07 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 45 RES 0.00 0.00 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 44 RES 0.00 0.00 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 46 RES 0.00 1.00 1.8 DUNLIN WOODS REALW COMRAMN 202 431 RES 0.00 0.00 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 42 RES 0.00 0.00 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 41 RES 0.00 0.00 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 40 RES 0.00 0.00 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 39 RES 0.001 14.02 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 102 88-90, RES 0.00 29.27 2.4 EDGERLY, LAWRENCE R. & PATRICIA D. 201 15 RES 0.00 1.70 1.5 ai-IMT, EMILY 104 34 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 EVANS, JOHN R. & DOROTHY Z. 205 1 RES 0.00 9.70 8.6 FAVARA, JAMES C. & NANCY 104 40 RES 0.00 0.231 0.3 FERMERY, CAROL 2031 10 RES 0.00 0.79 0.8 FINN, EDWIN R. 2041 3 O/S 0.00 9.34 7.7 FINN, JOHN J. & BARBARA 204 14 VVDL 61.00 61.00 63.1 FISHER, JERRY H. & ROSE M. 103 13- RES 0.00, 0.91 1.5 FLOYD, MWEL M. 102 73 RES 0.00 0.29 0.2 -FOLEY, MARK D. & LYNNE P. 103 7 RES 0.00 1.09 0.9 I IGEBO, DONALD H. & PATRICLA. M. 207, 24 RES 0.00 2.04 2.1 Page 2 STDSPRD2.XLS ........ --- . .......... ........... GELBERT, MIML 104 23 RES 0.00 0.35 0.3 GLASS, DEBRA R. 102 57 RES 0.00 0.33 0.3 GLASS, ROSS VERNON & CAROL B. 103 20 RES 0.00 0.32 0.5 GLENN, JEFFREY L. 101- 29 RES 0.00 0.17 0.5 GOMMER, ROBERT & DORIS 104 56 RES 0.00 @5.091 4.1 GOLDSMrrH, SHEELA B. 203 15 HAY 0.00 i6.00 64.9 GOLDSMUH, SHEMA B. 203 14 ols 0.00 7.00 5.5 GOODRIDGE, RICHARD H. & JO-ANN 103 6 RES 0.00 1.02 0.8 GOSSELIN, ROLAND R, & IUDrrH L. 2071 27 RES 0.001 2.01 1.9 GOUGH, WUl.IAM 104 47 RES 0.00 0.261 0.2 GOVE, SCOTr & CHERYL 102 77 RES 0.00 0.50 0.5 GRANT, WCHAEL D. & LEAH 207 16, RES 0.00 2.05 2.1 GREAT BAY CAMPING VUJAGE INC. 201 20 com 0.00 31.00 26.8 HACKETr, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 is RES 4.00 6.00 5.5 HACKM, THOMIAS R. & MARY R. 203 7 RES 0.00 0.34 0.3 HACKETT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203. 8 O/S 0.00 2.40 3.7 HACKETT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 9 O/S 0.00 2.40 0.7 HACKETT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 6 O/S 5.30 5.30 4.8 HALUNAN, ROBERT J. 102 68 RES 0.00 j 0.32 03 HALLINAN, ROBERT J. & BARBARA A. 206 9 RES 0.00 9.20 2.8 HARDIN, RICHARD C. & MANE 1. 104 14 RES 0.00 0.23 0.3 HAUSHEL, BRUCE W. & JOANNE L. 201 5 ols 0.00 8.60 8.1 HAYDEN, JAMES & BARBARA 201 23 RES 43.00 44.80 36.7 HAYDEN, JAMES & BARBARA 201 24 O/S 0.00 0.00 0.2 HAYDEN, MARK L. & SUE E. 1021 27 RES 0.00 0.54 0.5 HEATH, LARRY & JOYCE 101 33 RES 0.00 0.57 0.7 HENNESSEY, FREDERICK R. 102 72 RES 0.00 0.22 0.2 HERLMY, BEATRICE T. 102 69 RES 0.00 0.18 0.2 HETr, LESLIE & LETrY 102 34 RES 0.00 0.22 0.2 H=, LESLIE & LETrY 1021 35 RES 0.00 0.32 0.3 HEYL, JAMES T. & NANCY S. 204 is HAY 10.00 11.80 10.7 HIGLEY, THEODORE N. & DAWN A. 204 12 RES 0.00 2.10 2.4 HILL, TERRY D, & CHERYL L. 207 28 RES 0.00 2.12 2.1 HIROSS, EDWARD & UNDA B. 102 28 RES 0.00 0.43 0.4 HOCHSCHWENDER, DAVID J. & C. A. 207 26 RES 0.00 2.00 1.9 HODGENS, HOWARD J. & LORRA]NE M. 104. 31 RES 0.00 0.23 0.3 HOGE, DONALD E. & DONNA K, 103 5.4 RES 0.00. 3.25 3.2 HOLMES, PAUL R. 102 38 RES 0.001 0.14 0.1 HOLMWOOD, FRANK & MHUAM 101 6 RES 0.00 1.60 2.0 HOLMWOOD, FRANK & MMUAM 101 30&31 O/S 0.00 0.45 0. HOWCROFr, DONALD H. 204, 6 RES 0.00 2.00 1.8 HOWCROFr, THOMAS H. & MARGAREr 204 7 RES 0.00 3.95 3.5 HOYT, CARL B. & DoRoTHy M. 101 28 RES 0.001 0.38 0.6 HOYT, JUDSON W. 207 6 O/S 76.00 76.00 74.5 HUGHES, STEPHEN E. & SHARON 207 13 RES 0.00 2.43 2.5 HULL, ELIZABETH E. 102, 9 RES 0.00 0.73 0.7 HULL, ELIZABLTH E. 102 45 RES 0.00 0.18 -0.2 IANNICELU, VATHIE P. 102 36 RES 0.00, 0.29 0.3 JACKSON, RALPH W, & NLARGAREr 201 19 RES 0.00 3.20 2.7 JOURDENIAS, RICHARD & COLLEEN D. 104 3=6 RES 0.00 0.2=8 0.2 KAUFMANN, TEMA M. & WAYNE R. 2031 161 RES 0.00 1.901 1.91 Page 3 STDSPRD2.XLS .............. KEEP, WESLEY R. & CONSTANCE L. 1041 17 RES 0.00 1.09 1.1 KELLEY, ROBERT J. & CAROL B. 202 16 RES 0.00 1.50 1.5 KEMCY, PAULINE F. 103 21 O/S 0.00 8.70 6.6 MNGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 56 IND 0.00 9.201 8.6 KENGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 511 RES 0.00 1.60 1.4 KNGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 52 ols 0.00 2.40 3.1 IGNOSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 5 O/S 0.00 21.00 12.3 IMGSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 1 IND 0.00 30.00- 27.5 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 8 O/S 0.00 13.56 13.0 KNMMTJN, BRIAN J. 1021 67 RES 0.00 0.21 0.2 KNMMTJN, BRIAN J. 102 67 RES 0.00 0.21 0.3 KNE?9MIN, HARR= 102 66 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 KURTH, SYLVIA 102 12 RES 0.00 0.93 1.7 LA BONTE@ LIONEL & GRFrA 201 13 O/S 0.00 130.00 117.9 LA BRANCHE, RAYMOND & JEANNMTE 1011 10 RES 0.00 0.56 0.8 LAGASSE, DAVED & ELAINE L. 1041 19 RES 0.00 0.64 0.7 LANE, FRANCIS F., JR. & SHEELA S. 102 18 RES 0.00. 0.17 0.2 LAWRENCE, 0. KENT M 101 25 RES 0.00 .0.15 0.2 LE GAULT, ROBERT & LUC= 201 8 O/S 0.00 1.10 Lo LE GAULT, ROBERT P. & DONNA E. 101 23 RES 0.00 0.16 0.2- UNSCOTr, IMNNETH W. & AUDREY E. 102, 42 RES 0.00 0.27 0.4 LLOYD OWEN, PAMELA H. & PMRS, S. C. 102 13 RES 0.00 0.22 0.2 LONG, HAROLD F. & DOROTHY P. 201 9 O/S 0.00 0.57 0.5 LOOSE, JOHN C. 102 21 RES 0.00 0.20 0.2 LYNCH, DONALD 102 78 PO 0.00 0.44 0.4 LYNCH,DONALD 2031 19 RES 0.00 2.70 3.2 MACDONALD, TIMOTHY S. & PAIMCIA 1041 18 RES 0.00 0.32 0.3 MACQTfARRIE, MICHAEL J. & KATHIE E. 102 75.2 RES 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAHER, MEGAN E. & DANEMS, WCHAEL 207 12 RES 0.001 2.03 2.1. MARSHALL, THOMAS, JR. & KATHERINE 101 20 RES 0.001 0.26 0.31 MARTIN, D. D. & L. HULLMARnN 103 9 com 0.001 6.20 12.3 MARTIN, D. D. & L. HULUMARTIN 1021 79 RES 0.00 0.92 0.8 MASTROPMrIM0, ARMAND R., JR. 2021 12 O/S 0.00 0.00 1.5 MASTROMMO, ARMAND R., JR. 2021 11 ATS 0.00 1.50 0.1 MATMEWS, NANCY A. 1031 15 RES 0.00 0.30 0.2 MCCARTHY, TIMOTHY C. & CONSTANCE 2071 23 RES 0.001 2.00 2.1 MCCLURE, MARK P. & LOUISA 1. 101 26 RES 0.00 0.32 0.4 MCGRAEL, NUCHAEL D. & MARY P. 207 30 RES 0.00 2.02 2.1 MCGRAIL, NHCHAEL D. & MARY P. 102 75.1 RES 0.00 0.00 0.0 MCLAUGHLIN, ROBERT H. & BARBARA 101 3 RES 0.00 0.73 0.8 MEDLEY, WILLIAM N., JR. & KELLY M. 207. 17 RES 0.00 2.32 2.1 MICHAUD, BRETT 103 5.2 RES 0.00 2.01. 1.7 MICHAUD, KENT R. 201 10 O/S 0.00 0.69 0.7 MICHAUD, KENT R. 204 19.1 RES 0.00 4.90 5.2 NUCHAUD, RAYMOND, SR. & NORMA 104 25 RES 0.00 0.33 0.3 MONAGHAN, ESTATE OF MARY 102 23 RES 0.00 0.56 0.5 MONAGHAN, FRANK 103 10 RES 0.00 1.10, 2.7 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 5 O/S 0.00 17.95 18.9 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 4 O/S 0.00 22.50 20.1 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 2071 31 mi- 0.00 2.02 2.0 WORGAN, THOMAS F. 1 2071 33 mi -0-00 2.26 3.2 Page 4 STDSPRD2.XLS ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .......... . me ---------- NNW .............. ... .............. MORSE, GOULD G. & ELM4,BffrH D. 102 3 RES 0.00 0.35 0.4 MUSJAY, JOSEPH G. & SHAW, LESLIE J. 104 13 RES 0.00 0.26 0.2 NATIONS CREW FINANCUL SERVICES 101 22 RES 0.00 0.28 0.2 NFAL,ALDEN 104 11 RES 0.00 0.49 1.0 NELSON, BARBARA L. 101 32 RES 0.001 1.30 1.4 NELSON, CATHERINE M. 102 29 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 NERNEY, WCHAEL G. 104 33 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 209 5 RES 0.00 0.39 0.2 NEWLIN, ELIZABUM B. 1021 94 RES, 0.00 3.00, 3.4 NEWLJN, EUIZABLTH B. 102 93 ATS 0.00 0.29 0.3 NEWLIN, ELICZABEM B. 203 1 O/S 16.00 16.00 16.6 NEWLIN, ELXZA13EM B. 203 2 O/S 7.70 7.70 7.4 NOEL, JACK E. & DOREEN F. 102 25 RES 0.001 0.25 0.3 O'BRIEN, JOHN A. 1021 41 RES 0.001 0.27 0.3 O'BRIEN, JOHN A. & AUCE A. 102 40 RES 0.00 0.77 0.7 UDONNELL, JOAN 202 17 RES 0.00 2.09 1.9 OLIVER, CHARLES B. & LUCIE A. 102 62 RES 0.00 0.25 0.2 PALMER, PAUL K., JR. & ELIZABEM S. 101 1 RES 0.00 2.50 2.7 PARISH, LEWIS L. & GRACE A. 1041 12 RES 0.001 0.33 0.3 PARKM", THEODORE B. & FLOYD H. 2041 2 RES 0.00 4.20 3.5 PATRIDGE, HEIRS OF EVA 1021 53 O/S 0.00 1.00- 0.9 PEASLEE, DAVID H. & FRANCES P. 2031 3 RES 0.00 3.40 3.4 PELLEnER, KAREN J. 1021 55 RES 0.00 0.45. 0.4 PELLErIER, RAYMOND J. & SUSAN E. 2021 3 RES 0.00 3.50 3.8 PERKINS, GREGORY C. & SANDRA N. 101 24 RES 0.00 0.13 0.2 PERRY, CHRLSTOPHER L. & EUZABEM M. 102 17 RES 0.00 1.02 1.0 PETERSON FAMILY TRUST 207 20 RES 0.00 2.03 2.2 PHnqNgy TRusT, B. PHDmEy TRusr 104 51 RES 0.00 1.90 2.9 PLANTE, MARGAREr S. 102 16 FDG 0.00 0.11 PLOOF, MICHAEL F. 104 39 RES 0.00 0.23 0.3 PORTER, NATHAN B. & M E. SMALL 101 11 RES 0.00 0.42 0.8 PRO 2000 INC. 207 22 RES 0.00 2.28 2.1 PUBLJC SERVICE CO. OF N H 201. 22 RES 0.00 0.081 0.1 PUGH, ROBERT M. & MANE J. 101 21 RES 0.00 0.28 0.3 QUDINEY, JAMES G. & PAULA E. 101 7 RES 0.00 0.24 0.3 RANDLEIT, MARK R. & MAUREEN L. 102 30 RES 0.00 0.49 0.5 RANDLHff, RAYMOND & JANEr 102 54 RES 0.00 0.34 0.4 RAWSON, WMEERT F., SR. 102. 61 RES 0.00 0.34 0.3 RAY, KEVIN D. & PATRICIA G. 2071 15 RES 0.00 2.18 2.3 RENNER, BARBARA A, 101 Is RES 0.00 0.90 1.1 RIDGELY, ERNEST A. & BEVERLY 104 32 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 ROBINSON, WHIJAM R. & LEE J. 104 50 RES 0.00 0.26 0.3 ROBINSON, WMUAM R. & LEE J. 104 49 RES 0.00 0.26 0.3 ROBINSON, WMLIAM R. & LEE J. 104 48 RES 0.00 0.26 .0.2 ROGERS, MARIAN E. 2011 14 RES 0.00 0.91 0.8 ROLLINS, EENNEM A. & SYLVIA J. 203 20. RES 0.00 1.90 2.1 ROLLINS, NORMANS. &SHIRLEY L. 103 19 RES 0.00 0.72 0.2 ROY, BENJAMN & MARELYNNE 202 25 O/S 0.00 0.53 0.5 RUGG, OLIVE L. 205 2 RES 128.00 122.00 60.9 RUMFORD, JARED N. & VMJDnMINE W. 102 4 RES 0.00 0.27 0.2 IRUMFORD, JARED N., JR. & CATHEUNE PM 0.001 0.24 0.2 Page 5 STDSPRD2.XLS ................ RYAN, HELEN S. 1031 14 RES 0.00 2.10 1.6 SACRED HFART CHURCH 101 4 CHR 0.00 0.88 1.1 SANCHEZ, MANUAL G. & JUDrrH R. 207 21 RES 0.00 2.01 2.1 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 1 RES 65.00 112.30 42.9 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 5 RES 0.00 -.O.oo 0.9 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 1041 4 T/O 0.00 0.00 0.3 SCANLDN, EDWARD J. 10-41 3 O/S 0.00 0.00 3.1 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 7 RES 0.00 0.00 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 8 RES 0.00. 0.00 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 9 RES 0.00 0.00 0.2 , SCANLON, EDWARD J. -104 10 RES 0.00 0.00 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 1041 2 RES 0.00 0.00 0.4 SCHNEER, CECIL J. &MARY B., TRUST 1021 47 RES 11.50 12.60 15.1 SCOT,r, JOHN S., JR. & JUDUH C. 2071 19 RES 0.00 2.00 2.4 SHARP, REGINALD H. & CHARLOTrE H. 102 58 & 59 O/S 0.00 1.18 0.9 SHAW, PAULINE R. & GEORGE J. 101 2 RES 0.00 0.95 1.2 SHEEHY, FREDMUCK B. 202 5 RES 0.00 8.70 3.5 SLArMY, ROBERT G. & KATHLEEN A. 104 37 RES 0.00, 0.28 0.3 smrrH, cARL F., SR., HELEN D. & 2061 5 RES 0.00 7.20 7.4 SMrM, FLA)RENCE 1011 12 RES 0.00 2.55 1.6 SMUH, GARY D. & SHARON L. 1041 54 RES 0.00 2.40 3.2 SOCEBTY FOR PROTEMON NH FORESTS 2021 9 O/S Private 33.00 33.00 32.6 SOCIEff FOR PROTECIION NH FORFSTS 2021 7 O/S Private 49.W 49.00 41.6 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE -202 13 ORD 0.00 17.00 16.2 STEMON, ELVIN & PEARL 102 60 RES 0.00 1.50 1.3 S717EVENS, MARY E. . 102 821 RES 0.00 1.00 1.0 M7EWART, JACQUELINS 201 181 RES 0.00 0.43 0.4 sumulm, S s & SUDDUTH, GAEL R. 102 14 RES 0.00 6.20 6.5 SWANSON, GORDON 201 17 Com 0.00 2.00 1.7 SWELT, LYNNE P. 207 7 O/S 13.40 13.40 14.0. SWISHER, HELEN K. 203 21 RES 0.00 3.10 3.8 TAYLOR, ALLEN S. & NANCY E. 102 32 RES 0.00 0.31 0.2 TAYLOR, JEFFREY B. 206 8 RES 0.00 7.20 3.6 TSMO, MARGAREr M. 204 17 RES 0.00 2.30 2.2 THEOBOLD, LOUIS C. & JEAN H. 102 85 RES 0.00 0.38 0.3 TOTH, TEBOR & DIANA 2061 3 RES 0.001 6.10 5.4 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 202 14 CEM 0.00 3.70 3.6 TO" OF NFWFIELDS 101 8 T/O Public 0.00 14.03 14.6 TOWN OF NEWFEEIDS 202 38 RES Public 0.00 6.88 7.2- TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 101 34, wwr 0.00 13.00 7.0 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 103 2 OIS Public 0.00, 1.02 0.8 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 103 3 O/S Public 0.00 1.01 0.8 TOWN OF NEWFEELDS 103 4 O/S Public 0.00 1.47 1.2 TOWN OF NEWFEELDS 104 35 RES 0.00 0.041 0.0 TOWN OF NEWUHMS 1021 20 RES 0.00 0.00 1.2 TOWN OF NL"WFIELDS -102 10 RES 1 0.00 0.00 1.1 TOWN OF NEWFEELDS 102 1 CEM 0.00 1.50 2.8 TOWN OF NEWFEELDS 102 7 Vns 0.00 0.14. 0.1 TOWN OF NEVIFIELDS 102 74, T/O 0.00 0.00 0.1- TOWN OF NEWFEELDS 102 801 RES, 0.00 0.19 0.2 ITOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 871 ELEI 0.00 0.00 3.9 Page 6 STDSPRD2.XLS ......... . . . . . .. . . . . --------------- --------------- 'Am EN TOWN OF NEVIFIELDS 102 49 L14C 0.00 0.61 0.6 TOVM OF NE%VFEEIJ)S 206 1 PLY 0.00 0.00 3.4 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 96 EMS 0.00 0.00 0.5 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 44 osw 0.00 0.04 0.0 TOWN OF NEVIFIELDS 204 1.01 O/S Public 0.00 8.00 7.7 TOWN OF NEMULDS 205 3 T/O Public 0.00 37.00 33.7 TRIPP, HOMIER G. & JEAN C. 202 1 RES 0.00 0.91 0.9 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.3 O/S 0.00 2.07 1.4 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.2 O/S 0.00 4.76 4.4 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.1 Com 0.00 4.52 3.9 UNIVERSALNr SOCEM 102 76 CHR 0.00 0.00 0.2 VEEIRA, ROBERT F. & DLANE R. 102 39 RES 0.00 0.89 0.9 WALKER, RICHMM G. 207 8 O/S 0.00 4.10 3.9 WEBB, LYLE R. & SHHtLEY 1. 1021 37 RES 0.00 0.53 0.5 WEBB, ROBERT 201 3 O/S 0.00 2.50 3.5 WEU,ER, RICHARD J. & KATHERINE A. 101 27 RES -0.00 0.37 0.5 WHrrE, BRUCE D. & EUMEN R. 104 55 RES 0.00 3.47 5.3 WIDELL, WELLIAM D. & CATHEY J. 104 30 RES 0.00 0.231 0.2 WnMER, D. A. & JANEWAY, B. 103. 11 RES 0.00 0.56 1.1 VALLIAMS, ALAN G. & JANEr 1041 U RM 0.00 0.26 0.2 VnUIAMS, CRAIG B. 201 25 Com 0.00 1.39 1.5 WELLMMS, DAVID L. & ELAINE B. 104 16 RES 0.00 0.23 0.2 WELSON, DONALD A. & CIMSTINE D. 102 5 RES 0.00 1.60 1.5 WR4KLER, MATTHHW & FRANCES 202 is, RES 13.00 13.50 13.1 WOODS, JOHN R. & LAURIE A. 102 43 RES 0.00 0.45 0.4 WRAY, JERRY W. & BARBARA E. 104 42 RES- 0.001 0.22 0.2 YOUNG, GEORGE A., JR. & PATRICIA S. 104 24 RES O.Ob 0.34 0.4 ZALAN9KAS, KEVIN R. & ALLEYNE M. 102, 19 RES 0.00 0.41 04 TOTALSI 617.40 1631.11 Page 7 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTNO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES ABBOTT, PAMELA S. 102 26.0 R-A 0.3 0.3 ABRAHAMSON, LEONARD W. & JOSEPHINE R. 101 17 R 1.8 1.8 ADAMS, SANDRA J. 103 22 R-A 0.5 0.5 ANDERSEN, CHRISTIAN T. & DONNA M. 207 .14 R 2.1 2.1 AREND, LAWRENCE R. & PEGGY L. 102 81 R-A 1.9 1.9 BAIER, LYMAN 0. & SHARON H. 102 64 R-A 0.2 0.4 BAHR, LYMAN 0. & SHARON H. 102 64 1 0.2 0.4 BATEMAN, VINCENT J., SR. & PAULINE G. 201 21 C 1.4 1.4 BEATTIE, EDWARD B. 102 15 R-A 0.4 0.4 BEATTY, DEBORAH 1. 102 16 R-A 0.4 0.4 BEATrY, THOMAS N. & MARCIA P. 204 16 R 2.0 2.0 BEDDIE, CYNTHIA S. 203 13 R 3.3. 3.3 BEGIEBING, ROBERT J. & LINDA A. 101 14 R 2.6 2.9 BEGIEBING, ROBOLT J. & LINDA A. 101 14 R 0.3 2.9 BEHANNA, JAMES K. & CATHERINE B. 207 18 R 2.4 3.1 BEHANNA, JAMB K. & CATHERINE B. 207 .18 R-A 0.6 3.1 BERGERON, GLENN A. & DAVID G. 202 26 C 0.1 0.4 BERGERON, GLENN A. & DAVID G. 202 26 1 0.3 0.4 BERNIER CORPORATIO14 104 22 R-A 0.3 0.3 BEkNIER, EDWARD P. & ELAINE M. 104 15 R-A 0.1 0.2 BERNIER, EDWARD P. & ELAINE M. 104 15 R 0.1 0.2 BOND, LAWRENCE S. & JENNIE L. 202 2 C 0.1 2.1 BOND, LAWRENCE S. & JENNIE L. 2M 2 R 1.2 2.1 BOND, LAWRENCE S. & JENNIE L. 202 2 R 0.3 2.1 BOND, LAWRENCE S. & JENNIE L. 202 2 R 0.5 2.1 BONNER, RICHARD E. SUSAN C. 209 13 R 2.3 2.5 BONNE .R, ROBERT E., SR. 209 14 R 0.71 2.0 BONNER, THE ESTATE OF MYRTLE 104 52 R 0.7 0.7 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 201 1 R-A 0.2 1.7 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 201 1 R 1.4 1.7 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 201 4 R-A 0.7 1.0 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 201 1 R-A 0.1 1.7 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 201 4 R 0.3 1.0 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 is C 1.0 1.0 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 21 1 3.8 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 .22 1 0.9 23.6 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 22 1 1.7 23.6 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 21 1 3.2 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 22 1 21.1 23.6 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 21 C 0.3 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 21 1 13.5 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 -21 C 0.2 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 202 21 C 0.1 21.2 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 204 1.02 R 0.2 0.8 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 204 1.02 R 0.4 0.8 BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD 204 1.02 1 0.1 0.8 BRAGG, WILLIAM C. & MARGAREr E. 101 13 IR 2.0 2.01 ,BROCKWAY, LOIS S. 1101 115.2 IR 2.31 2.81 Page 1 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTWO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES BROCKWAY, LOIS S. 101 15.1 R 2.6 2.6 BROCKWAY, LOIS S. 101 15.2 R 0.5 2.8 BROOKE, ANNE P. im 46 R 0.6 0.6 BROOKE, ANNE P. 102 48 R 0.31 0.3 BROOKS, DOROTHY & 203 12 R 6.71 8.4 BROOKS, DOROTHY & 203 12 R 1.71 9.4 BROOKS, PHUJ-MS F. & CYNTHIA E. 203 11 R 2.0 2.0 BURNETT, HOWARD F. & WENDY L. 104 .41 R-A 0.2 0.2 BUXTON, RAY P. 104 29 R-A 03 03 BUXTON, RAY P. & EDNA M. 102 63 R-A 0.1 0.1 BUXTON, RAY P. & EDNA M. 102 63 1 0.11 0.1 BUXTON, W1111AM G. 104 46 R-A. 0.2 0.2 BUXTON, WlIJ.JAM G. 104 45 R-A 0.2 0.2 BUXTON, WILLIAM G* 104 44 R-A 0.2 0.2 CALEY ASSOCIATES 202 8.2 C 1.8 9.2 CALEY ASSOCIATES 202 8.2 C 0.2 9.2 CALEY ASSOCIATES 202 18.2 C 7.3 9.2 CALL, RAYMOND E. & J-UDrrH 102 70 R-A 0.2 0.2 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 C 2.1 9.3 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 C 2.81 9.3 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 1 0.2 9.3 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 j8.1 C 1.1 9.3 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 R 1.7 9.3 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 R 1.2 9.3 CAPRON, RAE & RICHARD B. 202 8.1 R 0.11 9.3 CASWELL, CLIFFORD A. & HAM, JUDITH M. 103 18 R-A 0.1 0.2 CASWPiL, CLEFFORD A. & HAm, juDrrH m. 103 is IR 0.1 0.2 CHAFFEE, COLLEEN C. 104 53 R 2.0 2.6 CHAFFEE, COLLEEN C. 104 53 R-A 0.6 2.6 CHAPMAN, MARIORIE 202 10 C 0.4 0.4 CHENEY, WALTER W. 201 7 R-A 0.6 0.6 CHICK, JOHN A. & DOROTHY P. 102 8 R-A 0.6 0.6 CLAPP, DAVID D. & UNDA B. 204 4 R 1.1 1.1 CLARY, JOANNE J. 202 124 1 4.31 20.6 CLARIC, JOANNE J. 202 24 R 0.7 20.6 CLARK, JOANNE J. 202 24 R 5.1 20.6 CLOY., JOANNE J. 202 24 R 1.2 20.6 CLARK, JOANNE J. 202 24 1 1.1 20.6 CLAM JOANNE 1. 202 24 R 5.0, 20.6 Cl-UM JOANNE 7. 202 24 1 3.1 20.6 CLEGG, GORDON & KATHERINE 104 27 R-A 0.2 0.2 CLUNE, ROBERT 1. 103 j 16 R-A 0.1 0.1 CLUNE, ROBERT J. 103 16 R 0.0 0.1 COBS, STEVEN & BETSY ANN 101 9 R 0.1 1.1 COES, STEVEN & BETSY ANN 101 9 R-A 1.0 1.1 CONNER B077LING WORKS 203 17 R 2.5 19.8 CONNER BOTTLING WORKS 203 17 R 4.0 19.8 CONNER BOT7LING WORKS 1203 117 IR 0.41 19.8 Page 2 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTNO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES; CONNER BOTII.JNG WORKS 203 17 R 13.0 19.9 CONNER, ALFRED, JR. 204 is R 34.4 35.0 CONNER, ALFRED, JR. 206 2 R 21.1 22.3 CONNER, ALFRED, JR. 206 2 R 1.2 22.3 CONNER, THOMAS H. & JEANNE M. 102 11 R-A 0.4 0.4 CORBIN, JUNE L. & CHAPMAN, JOHN 1. 101 19 R 1.1 1.1 COTE, ARMAND & BARBARA E. 201 11 R-A 18.3 21.1 COTE, ARMAND & BARBARA E. 201 1 t R 2.7 21.1 COTE, CHRISTOPHER J. & BRENDA J. 207 11 R 2.3 2.3 CRONSHAW, KENNEM 104 26 R-A 0.3 0.3 CRONSHAW, WALTER R. & JULIA 101 5 R-A 0.2 0.2 CROSS, ADRIAN & CECILE 101 16 R 1.5 1.5 CROWLEY, PHILIP M. & MARIA A. 103 17 R-A 0.1 0.3 CROWLEY, PHILIP M. & MARIA A. 103 17 R 0.2 0.3 CUNNINGHAM, CHARLES W. & MADELYN D. 103 12 R-A 0.3 1.3 CUNNINGHAM, CHARLES W. & MADELYN D. 103 12 R Lo 1.3 * & G CONSTRUCTION 103 5.3 R 3.0 3.0 * & G CONSTRUCTION 207 10 R 2.6 2.6 DALEY, STEPHANY T. 202 19 C 2.2 2.2 DALRYMPLE, HERBERT R. & RACHAEL C. 201 2 R 1.3 4.9 DALRYMPLE, HERBERT R. & RACHAEL C. 201 2 R-A 3.5. 4.8 DAVIS, PHILLIP A., JR. & ANN W. 204 13 R 2.4 2.7 DAWSON, LEE & CWlKl-A, KRISTINE 104 38 R-A 0.2 0.2 DAWSON, WILLIAM R. & DOROTHY M. 104 43 R-A. 0.2 0.2 DE RHAM, MARGARET M. & KELLY, BRIAN R. 207 29 R 3.0 3.0 DEVANTRY, ROBERT J. & NINA R. 204 9 1 1.0 1.0 DEVEREAUX, PAULINE & JOHN 102 131 R-A 0.5 0.5 DIAMENT, JOSEPH & PATTI S. 102 24 R-A 0.4 0.4 DIMOCK, FREDERICK C. & JEAN A. 207 25 R 1.9 1.9 DIXON, CARL & KATHLEEN 206 4 R 3.3. 3.4 DIXON, CARL & KATHLEEN 206 4 R-A 0.1 3.4 DRINKWATER, GEORGE H. & TONI 102 so R 0.1 0.1 DUMAIS, MONICA & ROY, ALFRED L. & 202 23 R 6.0 7.6 DUMAIS, MONICA & ROY, ALFRED L. & 202 R 1.5 7.6 DUMAIS, MONICA & ROY, ALFRED L. & 202 23 R 1 0.2 7.6 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 102 88-90 R 1.9 2.4 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 102 88-90 R-A 0.5 2.4 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 27 R 2.0 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 45 R 1.9. 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 144 R 2.0 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 46 R 1.8 1.8 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 43 R 2.0 2.0 DUNLJN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 42 R 1.9 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 41 R 2.0 2.0 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 .40 R 1.9 1.9 DUNLIN WOODS REALTY CORPORATION 202 139 R 1.9 1.9 EDGERLY, LAWRENCE R. & PATRICIA D. 201 is R-A 1.1 1.5 201 115 1 1 EDGERLY, LAWRENCE R. & PATRICIA D. R 0.5 1.5 Page 3 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTNO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES ELLIOT17, EMILY 104 34 R-A 0.2 0.2 EVANS, JOHN R. & DOROTHY Z. 205 1 R 8.6 8.6 FAVARA, JAMES C. & NANCY 104 40 R-A 0.31 0.3 FERMERY, CAROL 203 110 R 0.81 0.8 FINN, EDWIN R. 204 3 R 7.71 7.7 FINN, JOHN J. & BARBARA 204 14 R 60.01 63.1 FINN, JOHN J. & BARBARA 204 14 R 0.2 63.1 FISHER, JERRY H. & ROSE M. 103 13 R-A 0.2 1.5, FISHER, JERRY H. & ROSE M. 103 13 R 1.3 1.5 FLOYD, ETHEL M. -102 173 R-A 0.2 0.2 FOLEY, MARK D. & LYNNE P. 103 7 R-A 0.9 0.9 GEBO, DONALD H. & PATRICIA M. 207 24 R 2.1 2.1 GILBERT, ETIML 104 23 R-A 0.3 0.3 GLASS, DEBRA R. 102 57 1 0.3 0.3 GLASS, ROSS VERNON & CAROL B. 103 .20 R-A 0.5. 0.5 GLENN, JEFFREY L. 101 29 R 0.5 0.5 GOERNER, ROBERT & VORIS 104 56 R 3.2 4.1 GOERNER, ROBERT & DORIS 104 56 R-A 0.9 4.1 GOLDSMITH, SHEILA 8. 203 is R 20.9 64.9 GOLDSMITH, SHEILA B. 203 is R 10.9 64.9 GOLDSN=, SHEILA B. 203 is R 16.6 64.9 GOLDSMITH, SHEILA B. 203 is R 16.5 64.9 GOLDSM3TH, SHEILA B. 203 14 R 5.5 5.5 GOODRIDGE, RICHARD H. & JO-ANN 103 .6 R-A 0.81 0.8 GOSsElIN, ROLAND R, & juDrrH L. 207 127 R 1.91 1.9 GOUGH,WUAJAM 104 47 R-A 0.2 0.2 GOVE;'scoTr & CHERYL 102 77 R-A 0.5 0.5 GRANT, blICHAEL D. & LEAH 207 16 R 2.1 2.1 GREAT BAY CAWING VILLAGE INC. 201 20 C 5.5 26.8 GREAT BAY CAWING VILLAGE INC. 201 120 R-A 20.51 26.8 GREAT BAY CAWING VILLAGE INC. 201 20 R 0.8 26.8 HACKFIT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 is R 3.3 5.5 HACKUT, THOMAS It. & MARY It. 203 18 It 1.6 5.5 HACKErr, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 18 R 0.6 5.5 HACKETT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 17 R 0.21 0.3 HACKEIT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 7 R 0.1 0.3 HACKETT, THOMAS R. & MARY It. 203 8 R 0.2 3.7 .HACKETT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 8 R 3.2 3.7 HACKUT, THOMAS R. & MARY It- 203 8 R 0.2 3.7 HACKET17, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 203 9 R 0.7 0.7 HACMT, THOMAS R. & MARY R. 2M 8 R 0.1 3.7 HA=rr, THOMAS R, & MARY R. 203 6 R 3.0 4.9 HACKErr, THOMAS R. & MARY IL 203 6 R 1.8 4.8 HALLINAN, ROBERT J. 102 68 R-A 0.3 0.3 HALLINAN, ROBERT J. & BARBARA A. -206 .9 R 2.1 2.8 HARDIN, RICHARD C. & DIANE J. 104 14 R 0.2 0.3 HAUSHEL, BRUCE W. & JOANNE L. 201 5 R-A 6.6 8.1 HAUSHEL, BRUCE W. & JOANNE L. 201 5 R 1.1 8.1 Page 4 GKG7-N3.XLS NAME MAP ILOTNO ZONDESC ACRES GIS ACRES HAUSHEL, BRUCE W. & JOANNE L. 201 5 R 0.3 8.1 HAUSHEL, BRUCE W. & JOANNE L. 201 5 waterbody 0.1 8.1 HAYDEN, MIES & BARBARA 201 23 C 19.2 36.7 HAYDEN, MIES & BARBARA 201 23 JR-A 14.5 36.7 HAYDEN, JANIES & BARBARA 201 23 R 2.9 36.7 HAYDEN, JAMES & BARBARA 201 24 C 0.2 0.2 HAYDEN, MARK L. & SUE E. 102 27 R-A 0.5 0.5 HEATH, LARRY & JOYCE 101 .33 R-A 0.7 0.7 HENNESSEY, FREDERICK R. 102 172 R-A 0.2 0.2 HERLIHY, BEATRICE T. 102 169 R-A 0.2 0.2 HETr, LESUE & LEM 102 34 R-A 0.2 0.2 MMT, LESLIE & LETrY 102 35 R-A 0.3 0.3 HEYL, JAMES T. & NANCY S. 204 18 R 10.71 10.7 HIGLEY, THEODORE N. & DAVIN A. 204 12 1 1.4 2.4 HIGLEY, THEODORE N. & DAWN A. 204 112 R 0.9 2.4 HILL, TERRY D, & CHERYL L. 207 128 R 2.1 2.1 HIROSS, EDWARD & IRMA B. 102 28 R-A 0.4 0.4 HOCHSCHWENDER, DAVID J. & CHRISTINE A. 207 26 R 1.9 1.9 HODGENS, HOWARD 1. & LORRAINE M. 104 31 R-A 0.3 0.3 HOGE, DONALD E. & DONNA K. 103 5.4 R 3.2 3.2 HOLMES, PAUL R. 102 138 R-A 0.1 0.1 HOLMWOOD, FRANK & bMUAM 101 6 R-A 2.0 2.0 HOLMWOOD, FRANK & MIRIAM 101 30&31 R-A 0.2 0.2 HOWCROFr, DONAU) H. 204 6 R 1.8 1.8 HOWCROFr, THO" H. & MARGAREr R. 204 7 R 3.5 3.5 HOYT, CARL B. & DOROTHY M. 101 128 R 0.6, 0.6 HOYTJUDSON W. 207 6 R 74.2 74.5 HOYT, JUDSON W. 207 6 R 0.3 74.5 HUGHES, STEPHEN E. & SHARON 207 13 R 2.5 2.5 HULL, ELIZABETH E. 102 9 R-A 0.7 0.7 HULL, ELJZABErH B. 102 145 R 0.21 0.2 IANNICELLI, KATHIE P. 102 36 R-A 0.3 0.3 JACKSON, RALPH W. & MARGARET 201 19 C 2.7 2.7 JOURDENIAS, RICHARD & COLLEEN D. 104 36 R-A 0.2 0.2 KAUFMANN, TERESA M. & WAYNE R. 203 16 R 1.9 1.9 KEEP, WESLEY R. & CONSTANCE L. 104 17 R-A 0.6 1.1 KEEP, WESLEY R. & CONSTANCE L. 104 17 R 0.5 1.1 KELLEY, ROBERT J. & CAROL B. 202 16 C 1.5 1.5 KENICK, PAULINE F. 103 21 R-A 2.2 6.6 KENICK, PAULINE F. 103 21 R 4.3 6.6 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 56 1 8.6 8.6 MNGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 51 1 0.2 1.4 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 151 R 1.0 1.4 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 51 watedody 0.2 1.4 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 52 R 2.4 3.1 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 102 52 waterbody 0.7 3.1 @ ol 201 ol 2 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 5 R 7.8 12.3 IKINGSMN-WARREN CORP. 1204 11 rR 3.8 27.5 Page 5 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTNO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 1 1 23.6 27.5 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 8 R 7.2 13.0 KINGSTON-WARREN CORP. -204 5 1 4.5 12.3 EINGSTON-WARREN CORP. 204 a 1 5.8 13.0 KNIPSTEIN, BRIAN J. 102 67 R-A 0.2 0.3 KNIPSTEIN, BRIAN J. 102 67 1 0.1 0.3 KNIFWrEIN, HARRIETT Im R-A 0.1 0.2 KNW=]N, HARRIff" 102 166 1 0.1 ol KURTH, SYLVIA 102 12 R 0.9 1.7 KURTH, SYLVIA 102 12 R-A 0.9 1.7 LA BONTE, LIONEL & GRETA 201 13 R 8.0 117.9 LA BONTE, LIONEL & ORETA 201 13 R-A 108.4 117.9 LA BONTE, LIONEL & GRFrA 201 13 R 0.2 117.9 LA BONTE, LIONEL & GRETA 201 13 waterbody 1.2 117.9 LA BRANCHE, RAYMOND & JEANNETTE 101 .10 R-A 0.8 0.9 LAGASSE, DAVID & ELAINE L. 104 19 R-A 0.7 0.7 LANE, FRANCIS F., JR. & SHEILA S. Im 19 R-A 0.2 0.2 LAWRENCE, 0. KENT M 101 25 R 0.2 0.2 LE GAULT, ROBERT & LUCILLE 201 8 R-A 1.01 1.0 LE GAULT, ROBERT P. & DONNA E. 101 .23 R 0.2 0.2 LJNSCOTT, KENNETH W. & AUDREY E. 102 142 R 0.4 0.4 LLOYD OWEN, PAMELA H. & PIERS, s. c. 102 13 R-A 0.2 0.2 LONG, HAROLD F. & DOROTHY P. 201 9 R-A 0.5 0.5 LOOSE, JOHN C. 102 21 R-A 0.21 0.2 LYNCH,DONALD 102 78 R-A 0.4 0.4 LYNCH, ' DONALD 203 19 R 2.5 3.2 LYNCH,DONALD 203 119 R 0.7 3.2 MACDONALD, TIMOTHY S. & PATRICIA A. 104 18 R-A 0.3 0.3 MACQUARRIE, MICHAEL J. & KATHIE E. 102 75.2 R-A 0.01 0.0 MAHER, MEGAN E. & DANIELS, MICHAEL A. 207 12 R 2.1 2.1 MARSHALL, THOMAS, JR. & KATHERINE 101 20 R 0.3 0.3 MARTIN, D. DAVID & LAURA HULtMARTIN 102 179 R-A 0.8 0.8 MARTIN, D. DAVID & LAURA HULL-MARTIN 103 9 R 6.1 12.3 MASMOPIETRO, ARMAND R., JR. 202 12 C 1.5 1.5 MASTROPIETRO, ARMAND R., JR. 202 11 C 0.1 0.1 MATTHEWS, NANCY A. 103 15 R-A 0.1 0.2 MATTHEWS, NANCY A. 103 .15 R 0.1 0.2 MCCARTHY, TIMOTHY C. & CONSTANCE m. 207 23 R 2.1 2.1 MCCLURE, MARK P. & LOUISA J. 101 26 R 0.4 0.4 MCGRAIL, MICHAEL D. & MARY P. 102 75.1 R-A 0.0 0.0 MCGRAIL, MICHAEL D. & MARY P. 207 30 R 2.1 2.1 MCLAUGHLIN, ROBERT H. & BARBARA A. 101 13 R-A 0.8 0.8 MEDLEY, WILLLA-M N., JR. & KELLY M. 207 17 R 2.1 2.1 MICHAUD, BRETT 103 5.2 R 1.7 1.7 MICHAUD, KENT R. 201 10 R-A 0.7 0.7 MICHAUD, KENT R. 204 19.1 R 5.2 5.2 HAUDt RAYMOND, SR. & NORMA R-A 0.3 0.3 Lim 1104 25 JMONAGHAN, ESTATE OF MARY .1102 23 R-A 0.5 0.5 Page 6 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTWO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES MONAGHAN, FRANK 103 10 R-A 1.0 2.7 MONAGHAN, FRANK 103 10 R 1.7 2.7 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 5 R 3.1 18.9 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 5 R 14.01 18.9 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 15 1 1.7 18.9 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 4 1 3.3 20.1 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 4 R 16.8 20.1 MOORE, WESLEY T., JR. & SUZANNE 207 31 R 2.0 2.0 MORGAN, THOMAS F. 207 -33 R 3.21 3.2 MORSE, GERALD G. & 13117-ABRM D. 102 3 R-A 0.4 0.4 MUSJAK, JOSEPH G. & SHAW, LESLIE J. 104 13 R 0.2 0.2 NATIONS CREDrr FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. 101 22 R 0.2 0.2 NEAL, ALDEN 104 11 R-A 0.8 1.0 NEAL, ALDEN 104 111 R 0.2 1.0 NELSON, BARBARA L. 101 32 R-A 1.4 1.4 NELSON, CATHERINE M. 102 29 R-A 0.2 0.2 NERNEY, MICHAEL G. 104 33 R-A 0.2 02 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 209 5 R 0.0 0.2 NEWLIN, ELIZABETH B. 102 94 R-A 0.9 3.4 NEWLJN, ELU-42ETH B. 102 83 R-A 0.3 0.3 NEWLIN, ELIZABETH B. 102 94 R 2.5 3.4 NEWLIN, ELIZ"ETH B. 203 1 R 16.2 16.6 NEWLIN, ELIZABETH B. 203 1 1 0.3 16.6 NEWLIN, ELIZABETH B. 203 .2 R 4.0 7.4 NEWLIN, ELIZABETH B. 203 2 R 3.1 7.4 NEWLIN, ELIZABETH B. 203 2 waterbody 0.4 7.4 NOEI,'JACK E. & DOREEN F. 102 25 R-A 0.3 0.3 O'BRIEN, JOHN A. 102 41 R 0.3 0.3 O'BRIEN, JOHN A. & ALICE A. 102 40 R 0.7 0.7 O'DONNELL, JOAN 202 17 C 1.81 1.8 OLIVER, CHARLES B. & LUCIE A. 102 62 R-A 0.1 0.2 OLIVER, CHARLES B. & LUCIE A. 102 62 1 0.1 0.2 PALMM, PAUL K, JR. & ELIZABETH S. 101 1 R 1.1 2.7 PALMER, PAUL YL, JR. & ELIZABETH S. lot I R-A 1.7-- 2.7 PARISH, LEWIS L. & GRACE A. 104 12 R-A 0.1 0.3 PARISH, LEWIS L. & GRACE A. 104 12 R 0.2 0.3 PARKMAN, THEODORE B. & FLOYD H. 204 2 R 3.5 3.5 PATRIDGE, HEIRS OF EVA 102 53 1 0.9 0.9 PEASLE33, DAVID H. & FRANCES P. 203 13 R 3.4 3.4 PELLETIER, KAREN J. 102 155 1 0.4 0.4 PELLETTER, RAYMOND J. & SUSAN E. 202 3 C 1.6 3.8 PELIXTIER, RAYMOND J. & SUSAN E. 202 3 C 0.3 3.8 PELIZIUR, RAYMOND J. & SUSAN E. 202 3 R 1.9 3.8 PERIaNS, GREGORY C. & SANDRA N. 101 24 R 0.2 0.2 PERRY, CHRISTOPHER L. & ELIZABLrrH M. 102 17 R-A 1.0- 1.0 PETERSON FAMILY TRUST 207 20 R 2.2 2.2 21 2 iPHINNEY TRUST, THE BETTY PH94NEY TRUST 1104 51 R 2.6 2.9 JPHINNEY TRUST, THE BETTY PHINNEY TRUST 1104 151 IR-A 031 2.9 Page 7 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTNO ZONDESC ACRM GIS-ACRES PLAITM MARGARET S. 102 16 R-A 0.1 0.1 PLOOF, MICHAEL F. 104 39 R-A 0.3 0.3 PORTER, NATHAN B. MARGARET E. SMALL 101 11 R 0.8 0.8 PRO 2000 INC. 207 22 R 2.1 2.1 PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 201 22 C 0.1 0.1 PUGH, ROBERT M. & DIANE 1. 101 21 R 0.3 0.3 QUINNEY, JAMES G. & PAULA E. 101 7 R-A 0.3 0.3 RANDL=, MARK R. & MAUREEN L. 102 30 R-A 0.5 0.5 RANDLETT, RAYMOND & JANET 102 54 0.4 0.4 RAWSON, HERBERT F., SR. 102 61 R-A 0.1 03 RAWSON, HERBERT F., SR. 102 61 1 0.21 0.3 RAY, KEVIN D. & PATRICIA G. 207 is R 2.31 2.3 RENNER, BARBARA A. 101 18 R 1.1 1.1 RIDGELY, ERNEST A. & BEVERLY 104 32 R-A 0.2 0.2 ROBINSON, WILLIAM R. & LEE J. 104 50 R-A 0.3 0.3 ROBINSON, WILLIAM R. & LEE J. 104 49 R-A 0.3 0.3 ROBINSON, WILLIAM R. & LEE J. 104 48 R-A 0.2 0.2 ROGERS, MARIAN E. 201 .14 R-A 0.6 0.8 ROGERS, MARIAN E. 201 14 R 0.2 0.8 ROLLINS, KENNETH A. & SYLVIA J. 203 20 R . 2.1 2.1 ROLLINS, NORMANS. &SHIRLEY L. 103 19 R-A 0.21 0.2 ROY, BENJAMIN & MARILYNNE 202 25 R 0.1 0.5 ROY, BENJAMIN & MARILYNNE 202 25 1 0.3 0.5 RUGG, OLIVE L. 205 .2 R 57.5 60.9 RUMFORD, JARED N. & WILHELMINE W. 102 4 R-A 0.2 0.2 RUMFORD, JARED N., JR. & CATHERINE A. 102 2 R-A 0.2 0.2 .RYAN'111131" S. 103 14 R-A 0.3 1.6 RYAN, HELEN S. 103 14 R 1.3 1.6 SACRED HEART CHURCH 101 4 R-A 1.1 1.1 SANCHEZ, MANUAL 0. & JUDITH R. 207 .21 R 2.1 2.1 SCANLON, EDWARD 1. 104 1 R 39.2 42.9 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 1 R-A 0.7 42.9 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 6 R-A 0.1 2.7 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 6 R 2.4 2.7 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 R-A 0.1 0.9 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 15 R 0.8 0.9 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 4 R 03 0.3 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 3 R 3.1 3.1 SCANLON, EDWARD 7, 104 6 R-A 0.1. 2.7 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 7 R 0.2 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 .8 R 0.2 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD 1. 104 9 R 0.2 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 10 R 0.2 0.2 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 6 R-A 0.11 2.7 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 104 2 R-A 0.1 0.4 SCANLA)N, EDWARD J. 1104 2 R 0.3 0.4 SCANLON, EDWARD J. 1104 1 R 0-5 42.91 rs-CHNEER, CECIL 1. & MARY B., TRUST .1102 47 R 11.2 15.11 Page 8 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP JLOTNO ZONDESC ACRES GIS-ACRES SCM[NEER, CECIL J. & bbkRY B., TRUST 102 147 R 3.2 15.1 sCHNEER, CECIL J. & MARY B., TRUST 102 147 waterbody 0.7 15.1 SCOTT, JOHN S., JR. & JUDITH C. 207 19 R 2.4 2.4 SHARP, REGINALD H. & CHARLOTTE H- 102 59 & 59 1 0.7 0.9 SHARP, REGINALD H. & CHARLOTTE H. 102 58 & 59 IR 0.2 0.9 1.2 SHAW, PAULINE R. &GEORGE J. 101 2 R-A 1.2 SHEEHY, FREDERICK B. 202 5 R 2.3 3.5 SHEEHY, FREDERICK B. 202 5 R 1.1 3.5 SLATTERY, ROBERT G. & KATHLEEN A. 104 .37 R-A 0.3. 0-3 smrrH, CARL F., SR., HELEN D- & 206 5 R 7.4 7.4 SMITH, FLORENCE 101 12 R 1.6 1.6 SMITH, GARY D. & SHARON L. 104 54 R 2.3 3.2 SMITH, GARY D. & SHARON L. 104 54 R-A 0.9 3.2 SOCIETY OF PROTECTION NH FORESTS 202 .9 1 32.6 32.6 socwry OF PROTECTION NK FORESTS 202 7 1 7.5 41.6 SOCIETY OF PROTECTION NH FORESTS 202 7 R 34.1 41.6 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHRE 202 13 C 3.2 16.2 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 202 13 C 12.9 16.2 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHRE 202 13 C 0.2 16.2 STETSON, ELVIN & PEARL 102 60 R-A 1.0 1.3 STETSON, ELVIN & PEARL 102 60 1 0.2 1.3 STETSON, ELVIN & PEARL 102 60 R 0.1 1.3 snram, MARY E. 102 82 R-A 1.0 1.0 STEWART, JACQUELINE 201 18 C 0.4 0.4 SUDDUTH, SOLON SCOTT & SUDDUTH, GAEL R. 102 14 R 4.9 6.5 SUDDUTH, SOLON SCOTT & SUDDUTH, GAEL R- 102 14 R-A 1.7 6.5 SWANS .ON,GORDON 201 -17 C 1.7 1.7 SWEET, LYNNE P. 207 7 R 13.3 14.0 SWISHER, HELEN K. 203 21 R 3.8 3.8 TAYLOR, ALLEN S. & NANCY E. 102 32 R-A 0.2 0.2 TAYLOR, JEFFREY B. 206 8 R 3.6 3.6 TERRIO, MARGAREr M. 204 17 R 2.2 2.2 THBOBOLD, LOUIS C. &JEAN H. 102 95 R-A 0.3 03 TOTH, TIBOR & DIANA 206 3 R-A 1.0 5.4 TOTH, TMOR & DIANA 206 3 R 0.1. 5.4 TOTH, TMOR & DIANA 206 3 R 4.3 5.4 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 101 .9 R 10.7 14.6 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 101 8 R-A 3.9 14.6 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 101 34 R 5.8 7.0 TOWN OF NEMMIELDS 101 34 IR 0.9 7.0 TOWN OF NEW'FIELDS 101 34 waterbody 0.3 7.0 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 20 R-A 1.2 1.2 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 10 R-A 1.1 1.1 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 1 R-A 2.8 2.8 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 7 R-A 0.1 0.1 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 74 R-A 0.1 0.1 TOVfW OF NElWFMI.DS 102 90 R-A 0.2 0.2 1TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 102 87 R-A 2.01 3.8 Page 9 GKGZN3.XLS NAME MAP LOTNO ZONDESC ACRES IMS-ACRES TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 102 49 R 0.51 0.6 TOWN OF NEVVFMLDS 102 96 R-A 0.5 0.5 TOWN OF NEWFM.DS 102 87 JR 1.8 3.8 TOWN OF NEVIFMLDS 103 2 R-A. 0.8 0.8 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 103 3 R-A 0.8 0.8 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 103 4 R-A 1.2 1.2 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 202 .14 C 3.6 3.6 TOVM OF NEWFMLDS 202 39 JR. 7.2 7.2 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 204 1.01 R 0.3 7.7 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 204 1.01 R 3.0 7.7 TOWN OF NEWFEELDS 204 1.01 R 3.9 7.7 TOMM OF NUMMELDS 204 1.01 1 0.5 7.7 TOWN OF NEWFMLDS 205 3 R 28.8 33.7 TOWN OF NEWFIELDS 205 3 R. 4.4 33.7 TOWN OF NEMTEELDS 206 1 R 3.4 3.4 TRIPP, HO&M G. & JEAN C. 202 1 R 0.5 0.9 TRIPP, HOMM G* & JEAN C. I R 0.4 0.9 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.3 R-A 1.21 1.4 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.3 C 0.21 1.4 TYLER, GEORGE P, 201 16.2 C 0.91 4.4 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.2 R-A 3.5 4.4 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 16.1 C 1.0 3.9 TYLER, GEORGE P. 201 116.1 R-A 2.9 3.9 uNrvERsALNr sociEry 102 76 R-A 0.2 0.2 VIEIRA, ROBERT F. & DIANE R. 102 39 R 0.81 0.8 WALTCMi RICHALAN G. 207 8 R 2.0 3.9 WEBB,'i.YLE R. & SHMLEY 1. 102 37 R-A 0.5 0.5 WEBB, ROBERT -201. 13 R-A 2.5 3.5 WEBB, ROBERT 201 13 R 1.0 3.5 WELLER, RICHARD J. & KATEUMM A. 101 27 R 0.5 0.5 VairrE, BRUCE D. & EnXEN R. 104 55 R 4.4 5.3 WHITE, BRUCE D. & EUMEN R. 104 55 R-A. 0.9 5.3 WIDEI-L, WUJIAM D. & CATHEY J. 104 30 R-A 0.2 0.2 WILDER, DONALD A. & JANEWAY, BARBARA 103 11 R-A 0.3, 1.1 WILDER, DONALD A. & JANEWAY, BARBARA 103 11 R 0.81 1.1 VMJ-lAMS, ALAN G. & JANEr 104 28 R-A 0.2 0.2 VaLLIAMS, CRAIG B. 201 25 C 0.9 1.5 WMLIAMS, CRAIG B. 201 25 R 0.6 1.5 WILLIAMS, DAVID L. & BLAINE B. 104 116 R-A 0.2 0.2 WlLSON, DONALD A. & CHRWINE D. 102 5 R-A 1.51 1.5 W]NICLER, MATTHEW & FRANCES 202 15 C 12.6 13.1 W]NIUM, MATMEW & FRANCES 202 15 C 0.5 13.1 WOODS, JOHN R. & LAURIE A. 102 43 R 0.4 0.4 WRAY, JERRY W. & BARBARA E. 104 42 R-A 0.2 0.2 YOUNG, GEORGE A., JR. & PATRICIA S. 104 24 R-A 0.4 0.4 ZALANSKAS, KEVIN R. & ALLEYNE M. 102 19 R-A OA OA TOTAL 1425.1 Page 10 NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CTR LIBRARY 3 6668 14112721 9