[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
";s4 MARYLAND UPLAISIM NATURAL AREAS STUDY FIELD NOTEBOOK WESTERN SHORE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANNAPOLISP MARYLAND COASTAL ZONE INFORMATION QH 76.5 M37 1976 MARYLAND UPLANDS NATURAL AREAS STU7 FIELD NOTEBOOKWESTERN -SHORE Revised 1976 by Tim O'Meara, Tom Chaney, Wayne Klockner ro Prepared for COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Maryland Department of Natural Resources 6 For further information contact: Coastal Zcne Management Program Energy and Coastal Zone Administration Tawes State Office Building Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Preparation of this report was partially funded by the office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Rogers and Golden, Inc., 31 W. Allens Lane, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19119 (215) 242-6858 PREFACE The Maryland Upland Natural Areas Study wag begun in the spring of 1975 and was designed,to partially fulfill the requirements of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. The original sampling methodology was designed by Rogers and Golden, Inc., for inventorying sites on Maryland's Eastern Shore. The fundamentals of this methodology are described in the opening chapters of this report. During the winterof 75-76, the methodology was revised to reflect our experience in the field the previous summer and to better.adapt the methodology to the Western Shore. A great effort was made to obtain input into the methodology from potential users of this study and from experts in the various subject areas for which sample information was to be obtained. This information was then synthesized into a sampling procedure. The sampling-procedure was designed to enable field personnel to quickly obtain a concise, accurate characterization of each site. The sampling is not meant to be a substitute for the detailed site assessments needed for a final project evaluation but to provide a means of screening a large number of sites for specific uses. Approximately 400 sites have been sampled on the Western Shore using this methodology, and the results of this inventory will be made available in computer format for potential data users. In addition, the sites will be evaluated based on the data collected for possible designation as critical areas of state concern. The Field Notebook incorporated in this report represents the methodology developed by the Coastal Zone Management Program for sampling upland natural areas on Maryland's Western Shore. The not ebook contains a description of the methods and techniques for data collection and is intended to serve as a manual for organizations or individuals who may be interested in carrying out field surveys of upland sites on the Western Shore. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This study was greatly aided by information and advice from many experts and professionals. Special thanks are due the following: John Antenucci, Department of State Planning; Earl Bradley, Coastal Zone Management Program; Grace Brush, Johns Hopkins University; King Burnett, Maryland Environmental Trust; James Burtis, Forest Service; Nick Carter, Fisheries Administration; Howard Erickson, Towson College; Francis Golet, University of Rhode Island; Herbert Harris, Natural History Society,of Maryland; Bernard Holla, Wildlife Administration; Lee Jaslow, Environmental Services; William Kramer, Capital Programs Administration; Randy Kerhin, Maryland Geological Survey; Steve Long, Power Plant Siting; Bruce Nichols, Soil Conservation Service; Maryland Park Service; Chandler Robbins, Patuxent Wildlife Research Station; Kenneth Ropp, Capital Programs Administration; Lewis Rudasill, Capital Programs Administration; Craig Ten,Broeck, Wildlife Administration; Tom Siccama, Yale University. As is apparent from the variety of people with whom we have worked, the study incorporates a diversity of disciplines. In bringing the various elements together, we have relied heavily on the knowledge and labor of the professional staffs of the Department of Natural Resources,,the Department of State Planning,, and the Soil Conservation,Service as well as members of the scientific community. In addition, we have had the good fortune to be able to visit.with many - knowledgeable and interested residents of the Western Shore.. We are grateful for the courtesies, hospitality, and kindness they showed us@, as well as for their valuable insights. The discussion of Aquatic Buffer Zones, included in the 'discussion of derived parameters in Chapter III, is part of an unpublished.report undertaken independently of this study. It has been adapted and included for informational purposes. "Aquatic Buffer Zone" Copyright 1975 John W. Rogers, Stephan B. Syz, Arthur A. Sullivan. All rights reserved. The permission of Francis Golet to include his paper "Classification and Evaluation of Freshwater Wetlands as Wildlife Habitat in the G laciated Northeast" in this report is gratefully acknowledged. During the summer and fall, the field crew stayed at.several state parks while involved with the site inventory. We would like to extend special thanks to the Maryland Park Service, the park superintendents, and park employees for providing a temporary home and all of its amenities for our field crew. PERSONNEL Project Manager Tom Chaney Department of Natural Resources Energy & Coastal Zone Administration Tawes State Office Building, B-3 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 301-269-2784(3382) Field Manager Tim O'Meara Field Staff Carolyn Gawne Wayne Klockner Pamela Kohlberg George Robbins John Robinson Eric See Katherine Swan Deborah Van Dyke TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . ... . . Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Survey Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Coding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Encoding Instructions . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 25 Card 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Area Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Area Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Nearest Town . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Card 2 . . . . . . . 33 Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36 Bibliography & Site Sources . . . . . . . . . 37 Current Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Site Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 42 Integrity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Occurrence . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Size . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . . . . 44 Average Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Forest Edge . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 45 Card 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . 47 Contiguous Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49. Aquatic Buffer Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Number of Community Types. 52 Community Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Auditory & Visual Experience . . . . . . . . 53 Wetland Wildlife Rating . . . . . . . ... . . 53 Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54@, One-Line Description . . . . . . . . .. . . . 54 Site Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Text . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 .Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Card 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Subsection Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Similar Subsection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Area of Subsection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 iv Page Waterbody Distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Waterbody Type . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 67 Waterbody Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Waterbody Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Waterbody Bottom Material . . . . . . . . . . 70 Beach Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Beach Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Beach Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 % of Stream Shaded . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Soil Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Soil Drainage . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . 73 Vegetation Type . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 74 Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Source of Disturbance . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Degree of Disturbance . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Passage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 77 Animals . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Site Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 Vegetation Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Plants . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 95 Woody Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Herbaceous Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Birds . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 119 Mammals . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 125 Herptiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 soils . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 D &,D + Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 Well-drained Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Watershed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 @eadings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 Aquatic Buffer Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 v iA All INTRODUCTION The Maryland Upland Natural Areas Study is part of an ongoing effort by the Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program to describe and assess the resources of Maryland's coastal areas. The study was begun in 1975 with the goal of surveying all areas within the Coastal Plain which had been recommended as potential areas of critical state concern because of their floral or faunal characteristics. The Study provides objective and descriptive data on identified natural areas. This information will be used to describe and evaluate the inherent value of an area as a natural ecological unit and to ascertain its value for certain compatible uses. For the purposes of this study, upland natural areas are defined as areas where, at present, natural processes predominate and are not significantly influenced by either deliberate manipulation or accidental interference by man. The majority of sites sampled include mature forests, wooded swamps, non-tidal wetlands, and stream corridors. Tidal areas were excluded from this study and will be subjected to a separate inventory and assessment. The areas selected as candidates for field investigation were recommended by a broad range of published and unpublished sources. These sources are described in the parameter descriptions section under the heading, "Bibliography". The candidate areas fall into at least one of the following categories: 1. Areas with unusual or interesting natural features meriting protection'by the state or local government, 2. Areas crucial to an ecological system which should be protected from inappropriate development or use, 3. Areas considered a primary state resources, and 4. State owned lands such as open space and parks. (See Table 1) 4- The study's sampling methodology was developed with two basic goals: (1) to provide a consistent data base so that areas could be compared, and (2) to enable the characterization of many sites quickly and accurately. An initial step in this study was to identify potential data users and their specific needs. Those users with a continuing and timely need are state agencies and departments with both functional and regulatory responsibilities. Prior to data gathering, these users were involved in the design of the information system. Department of Natural Resources personnel, state and local planners, and knowledgeable persons in related fields were interviewed about data needs to make the study as broad as possible (See Table 2). From an analysis of the data users' needs, the functions and scope of the study were established. As a result of these interviews and a literature search, the sampling parameters for the natural areas study were determined. Table 3 is a listing by field data form of parameters which were found to be important to the study. The major product of the Upland Natural Areas Study is a computer storage file from which specific natural area data can be quickly retrieved. Thi data management-system makes the data more useful by increasing its accessibility to the users such as state agencies, county planners, and private citizens. The data management system was designed with two main purposes: (1) to check the data for miscoding errors and (2) to print the data in an easily readable format. As designed, the management system will also allow retrieval of individual site descriptions or retrieval by individual parameters or groups of parameters. This will allow users of theldata to objectively rank areas by evaluating the different parameters in the context of their importance to potential site uses. Wherever p 'ible, the data format has been made compatible with the Department of oss State Planning's MAGI System. An example of a computer print-out is shown i on the following pages. iThe report that follows is organized into several sections. First, the SWEVey procedure and coding process is described. This is followed by the detailed parameter descriptions and encoding instructions for filling out the field data forms. These descriptions and instructions are organized by data card as shown on the sample field data forms under the section marked "Coding". The remaining portion of the report entitled "Readings" contains study area descriptions, glossary, and other pertinent information. In summary, the important features of the Study are: 1. The sampling mett)-dology is set before field work begins. This is important for consistency and uniformity of the data collected, 2. The methodology is designed to fulfill the information needs of potential users. Since the users were included in the development of the methodology, they are more likely to use the data collected by this methodlogy, 3. The sampling techniques are easily replicated so that new sites can be added and the study can be continuously updated, 4. The data is easily compared between sites, and 5. The natural areas information is readily accessible to potential users. -2- Table 1: Areas Selected for field Survey 1. Areas which have unusual or interesting natural features meriting protection by the state or local government. These natural features might consist of: a Natural habitats supporting unique wildlife population or a species whose range is limited in the state or whose numbers .are so limited as to warrant special consideration. b. Natural areas possessing unique features such as: 1. Sandy beaches or sand dunes. 2. Bluffs having unusual exposed geologic strata or offering scenic vistas. 3. Scarps. 4. Inland rivers having wild character, profuse bloom ing flora, unusual floral communities, or mature, regenerating forests. 5. Forest communities with a species range limit such as bald cypress, laurel oak, loblolly pine or overcup oak. 6. Endangered forest species such as chestnut or elm. 7. Trees which are currently national or state champions. 2. Areas which are crucial to an ecological system and should be protected from inappropriate development or use. This category might include:, a. Streamside forests which buffer aquatic systems from upland contaminations such as silt, bacteria, and toxic chemicals. b. Low wetlands which support many wildlife species, and perform such useful functions as water filtration, floodwater storage, and nutrient assimilation. 3. Areas which can be considered to contain a primary state resource. These areas include: a. Natural wildlife habits of high productivity. b. Areas of exceptional scenic quality. 4. State owned open space and parks. -3- Table 21 PEOPLE INTERVIEWED Wildlif e Nick Carter Fisheries Administration DNR Bernard Holla Wildlife Administration DNR Chandler Robbins Ornithologist Patuxent Wildlife Research Station traig Ten Broeck Wildlife Administration DNR Francis Golet Department of Forestry and Univ. of Rhode Wildlife Management Island Geology Randy Kerhin Md. Geological Survey DNR Vegetation brace Brush Geography'Department Johns Hopkins Univ. James Burtis Forestry Service DNR State Planning ive John Antenucci Div-., of' Comprehens' Dept. of State Planning, Planning Recieation William Kramer Capital P'@ograms Admin. DNR Kenneth Ropp Capital Pirbgrams-Admin.. DNR Rudasill Capital Programs Admin. DNR -Environmental Servides. tee Jaslow Environmental. Servlce@s, DNR Coas@tal,Zone Management., Thomas Chaney Water.' Resources Admin- DNR William Jackson- Water- Resourc7es, Admin.. DNR Earl Bradley- Water- Resourco--s-, Admirf-@.. DNR Soili Bruce Nichols, Sail C6nservatiorf S'drvice USDA Natural Areas Studies- Thomas Sicc a S'chool. of- F'ore@stry, Yale University Harold, Erickson- Biology- Departmeint. Towson College Table I PARAMETERS A list of parameters sampled on Western Shore natural areas follows in the order in which they appear on the data sheets which were completed for each area. Parameters Card 1 Area Number Area Name Date Nearest Town Card 2 Elevation Geology Ownership Bibliography Current Use Security Access Site Type Integrity Occurrence Size Average Width Forest Edge Card 3 Contiguous Land Use Aquatic Buffer of Community Types Community Diversity Visual Experience Score Visual Experience Term Wetland Wildlife Rating Categories One Line Description Card 4 One'Line Description (continued) Cards 5 Text Cards 6 Names -5- Card 7 Subsection Number Similar Subsections Area of Subsection Waterbody Distance Waterbody Type Waterbody Size Waterbody Depth Waterbody Bottom Material Beach Type Beach Length Beach Width % of Stream Shaded Soil Type Soil Drainage Vegetation Type Topography Source of Disturbance Degree of Disturbance Passage Animals - species, source, residency, frequency Card 8 Number of Samples Total % cover - canopy Total % Cover - understory Total % Cover - shrubs Total % Cover - herbs Vegetation Species Average DBH Layer Impact % Cover species -6- *JOHN SNTIDAW -SHI PPEN CREEK WOODS tW93330321305 Nk fl-M Nor -ova -r cy-_ -TOW & ?IF :Cwo-t- -alsyki sfft ONE UNE-DESCRIPTION- LARGE PIRE-OAK FOREST ALONG THE CHESTER R I VE It W-g@m%-AMMVA R r--lCA.T*GDRY _tttkl"MANT-@_040- UNUSUAL- WATER -wLA 14D -1- NTERPR E S T -HAD UT-AT' AR E74 --RARE#- ENCANGERM.-AW.-UNIQUE- @Slao- W W** ik ib o-ivlv* 4i 64_" di A-i**-* *wNu* 4A 6 W IF-6 IF 0 llf* *4rwosw*sr* *wo LOBLOLLY PINE AND OAKS CHARACTERIZE T4ESF FORESTS ON THE 7 @E-c H -WUVERi, 117 S "IM -TV THEL 141 L E- OF S".3RELINE-34 t0t ZHESTER *'I-VER-__- @I-TV, AND H44. OV E R -A It A_ldccu ENtE --AND -ONE OF- ITS SMALL TR 0 UfAR I E S*, -CREEK. SHIOPEN.:l -THIS FOREST ------- --- 'OF913-4MATES. Upl-40 _s_u@cESST3N-;-;1N-J4= SlJTSF-_TION_`COVFRlNG' .211 OF THE SITE9 A UEN;E U14DERSTORY OF SWEETGJ14S'IS COMING DIVERSITY RED lum UP U43ER A C433PY OF LOOLULLY Pf4ES. SEEDLINGS OF OAK AND T_ -THE OTHER -SUB SECT 1 ON NAKlNG__JP_79X-OF- HIEl-ARSAw IAKSv -itt #4 ---AfktAz:' -To @SWEETGU49 HAVE_-143STLY -REPLACED: THE'- -NAPLE, 4NO-SEECA RED lay MAIL -to -EtWITY -(A lUAA'L CV -T-RASIST TOkY@ P I NES_ AS__TAE_ OOKI-NANT---Cli4r]PY-TREES-.-,--'-ollUnLl;rE--IS - 14 3 UNO ANT 9- ESPE:;IALLY'DEER AND UPLAND GAME. NO 3SPREY NESTS WEPE .4 CONTIGUOUS LAND USE N-AGRICULT6RE S-WATER BODY SIGHTED 14 THIS SITE, BUT THJSE 4EST14:; AL(INS THE CHESTER 7 1 f@; A CA I _Mt (A E _aCQASI3NALLY -VISr-Ta- SEVEOA =--H S, WE- SF IILT -SITE*--BUT- L_ NATURAL`- Aai"-tC-BUkt@FER-Zdkg@:----@@N.,@ADEQtM!E-. _S_@-NOT. APPE tC-_X8k_E_- 7'WIT HIj_ THE' S I TF7 4140@@0104ERS-_ -1 47E'0@-_ To "PRE SEE RV;_: THE_ --A-PPLIC-A 1OLE- _W_ADFQUATE____ ---AREA. SEC UR I TV AREA SAFE FOR FIV*E YEARS U S:f-_@7 'SEVEIRAL HOMES- CUM -Pik-IVATF INDIVIDUAL IMORF THAN ONE OWNER) -..INVENTORY. DATE PEOPLE C014TACTED WWxk0-_0+PT*- ST AT F@ PLANN 1*4(; 1975@`(UNPUBLISFE13- -T?4Vr%TORV* HAUPT--W@00- Fo J3HNSO?49 ST 1:2 k@` All. 2t620mw- :HE dk -_-:OF-`#WAYLAN0 CRITICAL AREAS. 2i ItoDe *JOHNS04TOWN-SHIPPEN CREEK WE1,30S t5319333332t335 SUBSECTION SAMPLED E SIMILAR SS 01 02., AREA OF SUBSECTION 059 ACRES 219 A:RES SOIL TYPE 9 NATURAL SOILS GROUP - ------ SAA at - - -- - - E4A F3 JAL. Ir Gw -- --------- .__Smrfi. FT:. -U--FT- WELU----MAI##ED 7SOI"@ N2 10 1 L _- ER OD TAIL EASE OF PASSAGE -------- EASY -------- MODERATE DISTANCE TO WATER BODY 0-10 FEET 0-13 FEFT I TRIP A ACRES --1 :FO.7r- W IADY -SILE AND OfPlff@_ 30-ACRES SAND SILT 7 2@.@Ack--_LENGTH_ AND BEACH TYPE -------- PERCENT OF STREAM SHADED ---- - -- -------- 74 1 NDTWdW_ ac DR-STURBANCE-PRIMARY- 9-SECOhAARY--. SELECT-CUTTING SEL CUT I- I NG -MOTOR -VEHI CL ES. - VIEGEUTIOk TVPC- LOBLOLLY PINE LOOLOLLI PINZ_-4AROb(O3lO--__-'- t6ur-,*VfRAGE'COVER__-BY C*601 U-fTOX KEY TO VEGETATION LA VEGETATION cov I DBH LA VEGETATIO4 COV I OSH _OLL_v__,Pw__ G(Vf SEECH-1:0 --.42iFl4 StA C --C -40ITE' OAK* CK WALNUT.@ -00 ALACK LOCU --t @*41CXE". ur;@---.... lm__ :-_124-W U`---SVEET GUM-.@-- H-HERS U FLR DOGWOOD. to C SWEET GJM. 10 12-18 COV-AVERAGE PERCENT COVER U RED MAPLE. 00 C '.04 PERStMMDN. 00 6-9 Sw -PIwa jt@ In E_FT__- GUN C A Oft UNIQUL--_.l_._--__-___._ ---"-S WINeSERRY. :--_00:: C WILOW OAK., DOG400O." - 30- 30 A#cPJ ON - TREE 4ANUCAT.--t :-:N- -JAP HONFVSUKL. U' FLA' 0 BH-OIAMETER AT BREAST OwlIGHT H VA. CREEPFR. 00' U CON PERSI;AON. 1D H JCK-N-TH-PLPtT 00 U IED 4APLEe 10 "414 A V Mt- AXLY-' U -SWEET GUM. O-OSSERVOO -A8.UNDENT -A - P it ORTED 3()--' D-DEN*NESTqSPOOR R-RARE S SYMPHCRPOS 00 RES-RESIDENCE H S141LAX 00 DRY7 AM ft@@witam_ caceNTRATICN SWEET DAY& 00-@ @W@_Lj_"S4T, BLLfB-Ry U*-UNKNOWN H VA, CREEPERe 00 ANY NX 0 DENOTES INPUT ERROR Am RES- L ND -ft TA I 1@" ft -TAM -`01t 0- 11t, jq m 16 UK *PERCENT S-LO AC OPENINGS 3-52 * BALD EAGLE _R R UN *VISUAL EXPERIENCE SCOPE t3 0 w AW .00: SURVEY PROCEDURE The following section describes the technique to be used in the field inventory. The objective of the procedure is to obtain information to characterize the Natural Area, to paint a mental picture of the area through the use of words. It is not intended to generate data for'any specific scientific purpose but rather to identify areas of potential importance as Natural Areas and to provide information for evaluation of possible compatible uses. In order that the information acquired for different Natural Areas be comparable for these evaluations it is important that application of the sampling methodology be standardized for different areas and sampling crews. The following methodology attempts to draw the guidelines for achieving this standardization. Familiarization Review all air photos, soil surveys, and topographic maps of the Natural Areato become familiar with the topography, soil moisture, location of water bodies and watercourses, and the contiguous land uses. Review all material in the Natural Area folder pertaining to the site. Preliminary Delineation On the basis of this review make a preliminary determination as to whether the Natural Area delineations shown on the county map are appropriate. In some cases, overlapping areas drawn from separate sources were mapped as one area. You may find it desirable to subdivide large areas so as to facilitate description of the Natural Area, to more accurately describe distinct features, orto assign additional importance to a specific area. Similarly, it may be desirable to aggregate areas where the character of the le:d is sufficiently similar and which are in close proximity to each other. In any cases where i sites are divided or aggregated, follow the instructions for numbering the new areas contained under the tab "Card 1.11 Tidal wetlands should be excluded from the Natural Area boundary as they are not under the scope of this study. Enclosed open water areas should be treated as part of the Natural Area. Vegetation Type Delineation Using the soil survey and aerial photos, carefully elineate plant communities which appear different on the aerial photographs Soil types give an excellent indication of the vegetation one may encounter. These are sub- sections(.df the Natural Area. Generally, a subsection should not constitute less than 5% of the Natural Area or 10 acres, whichever is smaller. Exceptions should be made for small communities or features which are unusual or of special significance to the Natural Area. Enclosed open water portions of the Natural Area should not be designated as subsections unless they include significant floating or emergent vegetation. -9- FieldZampling Make a field reconnaissance of the different plant communities you have delineated. In the course of the survey adjust subsection boundaries to more accurately describe distinct vegetation communities or na'tural features. Add or combine subsections where appropriate. Sampling stations should be located, basal area and vegetation sampled, and resulting information recorded on a "Vegetation Sampling Form" for each subsection. Follow the instructions for sampling found under the tab titled Vegetation Sampling. During the course of th' field sampling, record by subsection any spedies of mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians which are observed or heard or for which a nest or sign is found. Where a Natural Area recorded on the site map cannot be found or it has been altered to the extent that it cannot be considered as a Natural Area, write@"Not Found" or "Rejected" on the site folder and list the reason it has been excluded from the survey. Wetlan'd Sampling Wetland Wildlife Rating should be completed for all Natural Areas which include one or more of the wetland classes listed under the "Wetlands" tab. Post Reconnaissance Review Following the reconnaissance, review all Vegetation Sampling Forms making certain that all pertinent portions are completed. Complete the remaining data forms according to the following encoding instructions being cafeful that the recorded information accurately describes the site. Complete a "Cardl" form for each subsection. Subsections which have similar vegetational and ph' sical characteristics may be grouped as "similar subsections." For each ,y set of similar subsections, complete one "Card 7" form and a "Vegetation i Sampling Form" for each component subsection. T,br principally unvegetated areas such as historical sites, state champion trees,on estates, etc., complete the pertinent parameters on all data forms except for "Card 7" and the "Vegetation Sampling Form." Staple the completed data forms together in numerical order according to their@card numbers. Group each set of Card 7 and Cards 8 by subsection. Do not include the "Audio-Visual Experience/Wetland Wildlife Rating" form in the stapled packet but include it in the folder. I Air PAotos Record the numbers of all air photos on which the Natural Area is delineated in the space provided on the sampling forms. Check to be sure that all Natural Area boundaries and subsection boundaries are properly drawn on these photos. Label each Natural Area and subsection by number on each photo. Mark and number all locations where % cover vegetation samples were taken in each subsection. Upon completion, return the photos to the' stack of county photos. Where aerial photos are not available for the Natural Area record the previous information on the soil survey photos and record the appropriate sheet numbers on the data form. Label roads and outstanding physical features on all photos used and indicate North with an arrow. Knowledgeable Persons Be constantly alert for persons who may have knowledge about thenatural, features or history of Natural Areas. These may include hunters, fishermen, birders, school teachers and others. In conversation make it a point to collect names of others and set up appointments to interview the people on rainy days. Record the names of any such persons on the Names form for each Natural Area. The,Study was organized in the following manner to carry out the sampling. Summer students were hired who had demonstrated experience in some type of vegetation analysis. These field crew members then participated in a one week training session to familiarize them with the sampling procedure and to achieve consistency between individuals. The crew was then divided into teams of two and each team was given the responsibility for sampling all the sites in a county. A field manager visited each team at regular intervals to help maintain tb6 consistency of sampling techniques between teamb, bolve proiAL-i-ci relating to the sampling procedure, and to distribute supplies. CODING The nucleus of the study is the field evaluation and the data sheets which are generated for each Natural Area. These data sheets will be digitized on computer cards which will become the data bank for the study. Computer programs are being devised to permit the printing-out of selected combinations of data for easier handling and for comparison or ranking of areas As in any computerized data systIem, observedIor ranked information will have to be translated into coding. This is a relatively easy process. A range of possible phenomena are listed in the encoding instructions with a specific number or symbol assigned to each. These numbers simply stand for the entire descriptive phrase or number associated with the actual field observation. Unlike typographical errors, where mistakes are readily observable, errors in encoding will be extremely difficult to detect. Therefore, it is essential that care be exercised in entering the code numbers into the appropriate spaces. The following sheets are instructions for filling out data forms by parameter. They are organized in the sequence which they occur on the data sheets. The transparent index dividers labeled - CARD #1, CARD #2 .... correspond to the computer card numbers on the data sheets. An example of a completed set of data forms for a hypothetical site follows. -13- Crew UPLAND NATURAL AREAS DATA FORM JRTO Photo Number (s): AHT-5MM-16 Area Name O1Lp' p- I I,- I I I 1 1 2 3 2021 so Month 05. May 08. August 06. June 09. September Card #1 area number *area number date nearest town 07. Ju October 1 125079380022011107 *SINGLTON CREEK WOODS 052076 SINGLETON Sit 11p-p2 IS- pTF I 1 p2 1 p- 1I 1pV p1 8 4 1p9 1pd3U 41 4? 4 76 77 GEOLOGY SECUR OCCURRENCE 2 B 4006 1#220252 0422211 6041 3800 GEOLOGY SECURITY 01. bgb,baltimore gabbro complex 11.i, lowland deposits 1. Threatened with destruction within five years. 02. kg, james run gneiss 12. tu, u, upland deposits a. areas currently being disturbed by man 03. km, mngothy formention 13. sf, setters formation (i.e.. channelization, siltation, logging, construction) 04. kma, matawan formation 14. ta, auia formation b. areas currently under plan to be altered 05. kmo montouth formation 15. te, calvert formation (i.e. sewer lines, homes) 06. kp, potomac group 16. teh, choptank formation c. areas contiguous with new development, highway 07. pcbg, baltimore gneiss 17. tn, nanjenoy formation interc anges 08. pzgg, gunpowerder granite 18.ts, st. mary's formation d. areas zoned commercial residential, industrial 09. pzpd, port deposit gneiss 19. ve, voleanie complex 2. Areas safe for five years 10. du, uaternery deposits 20. wbg, boulder gneiss a. areas not currently threatened with destruction, but *. more than one formation not currently protected. 3. areas safe indefinatly as wildlife management areas or parks 4. unknown OWNERSHIP 5pl Government i as 1pa. 1. Private Individual 6. state Government 4. 2 Corporation T. Federal Gover AVERAGE WIDTH 3titution a. unknown ACCESS 1. Disjunct - Area is broken into 4. Private or Von-Profit Public Or More than one owner 1p3or highway or road to site 2. Less than 200 feet 2. te Trail to site 3. 200t BIBLIOGRAPHY 2 3. Difficult Isolated area, no road or trail to t oo feet 5. 6oo 302 SITE TYPE pl 216 310 5. Lowland Evergreen Forest 7G 207pA Water Body 6. Upland 1200 feet 124-p3AAC 2. Upland Deciduous crest nd st 2 3. Lowland Decid:res 8. Cultural Site 2o6 120 4. Upland Evergreen Forest -a-pion FOREST EDGE 3 252- 1. Mil - Forestal portions of the site occurring INTEGRITY eEs as a single block with a minimum of CURRENT USE 1paion or physical feature is for1pe edge. 0 relatively stable as revealed by the pattern of regeneration 2. ations of the site somewhat 02. Vehicular Traffic (i.e. motor bikes) or tpfysoration. Disturbance is dissected or single block with 03. -rails 1 insignificant although some isturbance pening$ resulting in a moderate amount 04. Hunting 12. Pasture evidence. Vegetation is mature or relatively stable because of pe1pge. 05. Wildlife nt cu of its ability to resist succession. 3. orested portions of the site highly 06. Timber Management 14. W 2. ation or physical feature is dissected, occurriow 07. Single Home 15. changing due on either as a conseuence Includinged openings resulting 0 of ran-made or natural disturbance such as fire, erosion in a pge. or flooding. Veet relatively young and dynamic. 4, ie - No forested subsections. - ire management to maintain present character. 4. pasource of change is not evident. p4 Card Contiguous Land Use Categories I 4 Prim. Sec. T Site No. t1p1)1160 1 2 IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3940 CONTIGUOUS LAND USE COMMUNITY DIVERSITY of border by use for 4 principle Contiguous Land Uses 1. Contains us different vegetation cou animal habitats or physical features such as streams, bogs, ol. ea 09. Road scarps. 02. Wetland 10. F 2. ontains a few different vegetation types and 1p.d. habitats or features. . Park 12. Residential 05 13. Cr 3. Low - Contains predominantly one vegetation co 06. Managed Forest 14. Industrial or natural feature. 07. A 15. Recreational 0 16. Town 17. Cha Stream ONE LINE continue as one line on Card #4. AUATIC BUFFER ZONE 1. Ad The Natural Area provides a band of natural or successional vegetation greater than 300 feet ie than 66 border of included or contiguous auatic systems (wetlands, 'watercourses, or waterbodies and adjacent D or D 2.1pable - The Natural Area provides a band of natural or successional vegetation greater than 50 feet in width along more than 66% of the bord included or contiguous auatic systems. 3. In,ural Area provides a band of natural or successional vegetation less than 50 feet in width along more than 66% of the border of included or contiguous auatic systems. 4. Card Description (Cont. spP 11,N F ' 7677 TEXT P. 1 Site No. 15!A!T-I,ylilsl IsIll-rIsl 1,1,vicl, -FT-F 1.1pigill IM101 1AIC1,916111 101d 11641elpl-lolo[A l,-IolxWslrl 1,45v ['R FES Olrl 1 2 3 7677 so RI.vlEl,ql1l,vlr,l IsI1l'vlc,141,61-rll@JI ICIAIA.I@l 1WIE151-ri 10I.-I Is-I-/ @.l 1wLylildel 101AIA 1,-IlqlEIDIOI,-flIlAYLAI-ri.-ISI 111,Vl IrWE ICIT11 JOJAII 1V I/IVI/I I llllllcltlllg]Yl I 1A[VI E5i DIWIA1411VI(Al-rl IOICIclulQll IAA.91 IAISI [41SISIol-c I/ IAI-rlElsl. I [PI,91,ql'lsl 11W lrlArIllsl 1,-Iolql-rl1Zvl lol,-l I-rlylz-l kUrI4@Wd 1,41,?FETqTl-l 15:El,qk INT G]EI IUIPI I'rlol 131,51 ll@Nlcl#lilsl lwljr@l PAIVlYl lwllllllrlel 101,41KISI loIF1 ll@fl,-IROSISIIMA 15-116IRI IPIRIAS19IN17-1.1 I I I 151FIsj@IH1114141RI ISI?IClc11leLsj kclolu@vkl IAVI lbelvljlk-IRIsI-rl,,IRIYI.l I-rllll,-l ISIYIRlulBl 1,41NIPI IYl,-IRI.81 1,LIIIYIf1R ISI I I I I L5]GIAI,elEl ISIP[Alqls IEI-r!Alrle@l IAl4lLlOlwljMl--l IfflAWY[ JPWjSjSj,4jCjFJ 141,VI.Pl jPJRJOjJjjj.Pjl -JA4Cj Jqj LSINIAIPEEWPIAWICIE1.1 JAIJOi Jflvl,lpl@-WclfT I/Isl lplqlFlSIF @17-1 1/0,91RI-11 IAILl-rl1Anlul,;l-,ql 1 1 1 [5111SW41,FIC17-11 IV 16 'Irl WAIYI WA I vl 11 191E@ IMI IPI,, INIE I I/ W I-rlv LEI 1A Is IrIA lvlTl If 1,4 Is I @. I I-rlv 1,6 1 1,91/- la lo 6 Ir Iz. @ I/ I'VI I I -1ploFA,T7T-/ Fo 1- I-Id IsIll-ri-Z 151JIFI.1;nlslrl 1411 1,Fls-I 17-1//Ill All FI:, IF, 1 2@ IAIN@l ISI1W,511-lElr-lolvl [email protected] 15 IKI Sl y le, @ Wls Ig I,- I111sl I-rlvl-el ITIVI Aelcllklsl IUT A-1 .1 @@,IPI- 151LIgIl- 1, Tqc Fkl- I-,] u I IRII lvlglel IBIIIelcllll IAII-.s lo I 1A1?j'hfIsWVlrl- I I-P1,611111IS-1 lol,-l I-rlVi,-l ICI,41NIglFlYl 1-HRIFICIA IRI-41VI E511MIFIRIOllyl ItIol ItFal 1.719'1 IAVIC 191SIS1.1 171',VI,61 [PIAVIST, I !A41YISIRI 1,41,vl.Pl ISFcIAI-rl-rl--b?l,51.vl UgIrl 1,41RI614P IHFATJETT@ 15!N!Pi,qlsljl4l6lg'[-lYlllt'lFIIICI,1,[email protected] R011A 1,CLI,,lo@1?11jAljV lg@lsl @Lvl lullv[pijlsirly@ls@61 !41?1?lEklRIAIAilcL511sWvjEj IFlolRU 15i'017-WIAH ICIA61SIE(PI IBIYI 11112s6ild.1 IOU-TrIAIIA I I Emma .60, -U-TVTETRI TEXT P. 2 Site No. 15 IPIMIA I k 19 Isl yl- I/ 1HI-1181,11SIS 11 111EI bVIAITIVIRIA11-1 JAIR IEIAI. I IUIAP I -rlw IR 18 LF IS IlAolQlAsl-rlsl 1.1,-l Y'villsl Im IA H I lrleblr@ Ia 7677 80 15;Q@lgi,F1 IRIAIRIA 111611 141RIS-1 lsl1lvl.-l(ld-rllINI I-CIRIL-1-CIA 1,111?1,11,Yl lcluldrly@IALI ll-IAIAIIIII IAIVlpl :'ISI IV[All-lul,41gll-lEl lll-IAI,9111AAH l,'Iolql 18111-rilli V-1,L1,42RIFio F5TSjWj6j-rjLjA tVIP I kV I 1 11 I.PIL11 1FIC1. I III I I I I I I IIII I i I I I I i I I FITIII IIIIIIIIIIII Ili 111111111111,11 I I I I ITEE I I I I I I I I I I I I 15 VI I I I I TI I I I I I I I I L HIIIIIIIIHIIII 1 1-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T r5MIT-111 III 111 1111 11111 111111 11111 111 111 111 111 L F@ I -M 151XIII 11111 1 111 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F5 FY [TTT@Jjj 1 111 111 1 111-11 I I FTTTM wilti 1 11111 1111 111 111111 -T, IJ 1111 i!11111117 I-SI31 I I I I 1 1.1 1,111 1111 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ITT] @5 141 1 1 1 I-TTT T111111111111 I I FTI NAME(S) Site No. 16111MIRI. I ICIqlulclKl WqWnjPjLjfj8jEj9j9jVI I 1,91ol-91 131*1 IfIIIVI(51f-I,-IT-IOIAIj 1,RIPl.l I ISI1IVI6!41eH,11-lVl-l ImIst-.1 I?IAIqlrl-;IOIWIAJIEIRI I 1131IF1,1101 2 5 76 77 ao 16121HIR1.1 151111.IAISI ICI?IIlc:l,-151-rlTI I 181slyl 13141 I ISIIIMIIGII.IfIT I-INH IADLI lpkl)zl-rl-lo[-lvlEllq-L[ I I I I I i i i i 1 2 3 76 co 16141 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 FEER MG 'O 'no so so 410 so 1W do, #M so an so so 60 'm X_ Source Card Similar Soil of Animals st Di #7 Subqections Area Type 0 20 (Code and Source) 2 4 @ite No. 1700j/ I Y 10 11@ 10 1317 2j;F 1 2 Z 4 5 1.5 Iqld Ill Is-IdAflobighH3 S-106121.3 6171alSill'SI317!Slll@1612-IllI 1d514 17 1 It! /Ill I I I 1-++-H3191qj0 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 7 30 31 32 34 35 16 394041 42 6667 76 77 80 AREA OF SUBSECTION(S) acres. including similar subsections WATERBODY BOTTOM MATERIAL TOPOGRAPHY 1, Peqt - fibrous organic material with 1. Flat - little topographic relief over most of subsection recognizable plant parts. 2. iio-11ing, - hills with slopes < 15% over most of subsection *WATERBODY DISTANCE 2. !t;ck - black ooze compos@-i of silt and 3. Steep - slopes > 15% over most of subsection 1-ecomposed organic matter. 4. Mixed - flat or rolling topography with significant areas 1. Same as this subsection 3. Silt fine sediment with little organic material. (>33%) with steep slopes, gorges, or bluffs 2. Inc-1 @ded or contiguous (1-10 feet) 4. T,7d granular sediment. 3 10-50 feet SOURCE OF DISTURBANCE 5. Gravel - granular se-i ent with particles larger x e,_ 8 4: 50-100 feet than 2= (appro I _ .elmy l/ in.). 5 100-200 feet 6. Cobble - round or sab-round, water-worn rock 1. Channelization 6: 200-300 feet 17. Select"ve Cutting -500 feet 7. Rock - solid aggregate of minerals larger than a 3. Sewer Outlet 19. Fire T. 300 '@ -1/2-'lo incies in diameter. 2. Dredging 18. Clear 'Cutting 8. Greater than 500 feet cobble. 4. Culverts 20. Windthrow 5. Bulkheading. 21. Disease 6. Dikes 22. Litter Accurulation. leaf BEACH TYPE 7. Dams '3. Durping WATERBODY TYPE 8. Change in Watertable 24. paper 1. Bluff steep slope or abrupt embankment along 01. Primary Stream, <5 feet wide vaterbody edge or sandy beach 9. Logs and Debris 25. V an d a I I Sri 2. 10. Beaver Dams Tranpl-n 02. Secondary Stream surrounding area gently sloping to waterbody 1 , 5-30 feet wide 11. Algal Blooms 27. Motor Vehicles 03. Tertiary Stream, 1 30 feet wide edge . -dy T 12. Fedid Odor 28. Postacricultural. 04. Tidal Stream 3Sa Rpach - low, sloping sandy beach without dunes 4. D,=es - low, sloping sandy beach with dunes 13. Siltation 29. Other 05. Sub-estuary 14. Erosion 30. None 06. Potomac River 5. Nct aplicable 15. Ncise, 31. Flooding 07. Chesapeake Bay 16. Air Pollution 08. Pond 32. Grazing 09. Bog BEAC:1 LENGTH - 10, Pre sbvater Marsh 1. L ss than 500 feet 4. Greater than 150 DEGREE OF DISTURBANCE 11. Shrub Sw=, e 0 feet 12. Wooded Sw=-j 2. 500-1000 feet 5. Not Applicable 1. Severe - man's impact resulting in severe 13. Tidal Wetlands 3. lC,,---500 feet alteration of vegetation or natural feature IL .Same as Subsection 01 2. Moderate - man's impact resulting In moderate alteration of vegetation or natural feature BEACH Y,` 1 r-' H ILow - man's impact evident but not significant 1. Less thar. 1 foot 4. Greater than 20 feet 4. TI-One - evidence of man-made disturbance not WATERBODY SIZE 2. 1-10 feet 5. Not Applicable present over most of the subsection 1. Less thin I acre 3. 10-20 feet . I 2. 11-5 acres EASE OF PASSAGE 3. 5-10 acres 4. `0-20 acres OF STREAM SHADED I Difficult Thick understory or wet mucky soil 2. Moderate Interspersed understory or vat soil, 5. 20-30 acres 0. Less than 10" 3. 50-75% 3. Easy - Open understory, dry soils 6. Greater than 30 acres 1. 10-255 4. 75-100% 7- 'lot applicable 2. 25-50% 5. Not applicable ANIMALS WATERBODY DEPTH SOIL DRAINAGE iiecord 4 letter code and source for each animal. I L as than 1 foot 1. Yes, well drained soils occur in the subsection Source 1. Observed or Feld /Sws'-J, /., r - - 2: Greater than 1 foot 2. No, well drained soils do not occur in the subsection 2. Reported 3. Den. Vest or Spoor' VEGETATION SAMPLING FORM /S -b- To,,, S k /S i t e No. C-j 4@ nXII131ST01-oMol 7-1 h7-F7Tild-3 131 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 0 T.11 Aw /Pff Aw Imf III III/ Species Pw /@,f P, Ir /141( I'll /kw 00 LAYER Species I.I.COVA,@16I.COVI"ePlocov 0C011A&A116Cm,[email protected]. C ocov. Cov.. Cov. 1. canopy IT- 7 all1 *171 wX.-I, 0,J # 17 1 1 ? 17 1 1 1 2. understory 25 71 S. Ra 0. 1 .1 117 ;Z 17 1 1 3. shrub 4. herb 33 e 0 41 ;Z f/ 49 Ir AiqA.@ I-AchorIx 0- J, IMPORT 49 1 -3/ 0-L 81-'1 W.&-t 0 1. unique or rare 57 F 0 71 0J, [email protected] O.A 0 rl endangered 65- 091 hlaellecry 73 3 3;z 3-1----l Ifed H. 1/, .3 ;z ERAGE AVERAGE (9-16 Blank)' KOVER DBH 17 2 wMe 2 3 0-5 25@ ;z 0 Pt@vow 0 0 1-10 2=4-611 33 3 1;1 :2 0 Am 6,,t@@t 0 - 2-20 3=6-911 41 7 LE I a S" Rew L& x - 0 -30 4=9-12"" 49 5' 0 1 .0 Al. Red 0. A 4-4o 5=12-18 5-50 6=18-24" 57 2 V 2131 101 X &A 0 --0 6-6o 7=24-30:: 65 4 e 2 13 11 h' 9 2. 7-70 8=30-36 ?3- 6 / I J?.. 0 8-8o, 9= 1-3611 IK3@ - - (9-16 Blank) L-9-90 IT_ 3 H, /e ZJ Vd."..- 0 ANIMALS: 4 25 z ? 61-1 5',- 2 7 3 7 0 81. Clee re 412 ?1? 13-101 0 0 4 .1 2 5- V1 0 ore* 9 a S-, vlt,,- ,v v - 57 A Se, r 0 0 0 65 A. -I er - I I I er greg. Jvo.@,v wo xer 7n3 L mL wL NOTES: I //JS p 7ei e 0 2 fvv,, K0, t: 2 10 fmw m 0 S of Animal Similar Soil I 1pt ource) Subsections Area Type 4 5 ite No. I jj I I I I I I 11pj 211pF 1 o I 11pY 1 1 2 21 22 2 3031 541 42 66 AREA OF SUBSECTION(S) acresar subsections MATERIAL TOPOGRAPHY 1. Peat - fibrous organic material with 1. Flat - little topographic relief over most of subsection zable plant parts. 2. - hills with slopes of subsection WATERBODY DISTANCE 2. oze composed of silt and 3. - slopes f subsection 1pos. r rolling topography with significant areas 1. Same as this subsection 3. Silt fine sediment ttle organic material. eep slopes, gorges, or bluffs 2 1 cus ( 4. Sand granular sediment. 30 feet 1 granular sediment with particles larger SOURCE OF DISTURBANCE 4t than ely 5et 6. Cobr worn rock 1. Chann 1ing 6. 200 . 2. Dredging 1 7. 300 7. Rock - solid aggregate of minerals larger than a 3. Sewer Outlet 2.9. Fire 8. Greater than 500 feet cobble. 4. Culverts 20. W 5. Bul 21. D 6. Dikes 22. Litter Accumulation, leaf BEACH TYPE 7. Dams I WATERBODY TYPE eep slope or abrupt embankment along 8. Change In Wat ng 01. Primary Stream, wor sandy beach 9. Logs and Debris 25 2. 10. Beaver Dams 26. Tr 02. Secondary Stream, 5 surrounding area gently sloping to w 11. Algal Blooms 27. 03. Tertiary Stream, > 30 feet wide edge 12. F 2 04. Tidal Stream waterbody beach without dunes 13. Siltation 29. Other 05. Sub-estuary low sloping sandy beach with dunes 1 30. 06. Potomac River 5. Not a 15. Noise 3 07. Chesapeake Bay 16. Air Pollution 32. Crazing 0 BEACH 09. Bog LENGTH 10. Freshwater Marsh 1. Less than 500 feet 4. Greater than 1500 feet DEGREE OF DISTURBANCE -2p= 2. 50 5. Not Applicable 1. Severe - man's impact resulting in severe 12. Wooded Sw 3. 1000 13. Tidal Wetlands alter tior natural feature 14. Same as Subsection 01 2man's impact resulting in moderate BEACH WIDTH alteration of vegetation or natural feature 3man's impact evident but not significant than I foot 0 feet ce of man-made disturbance nut present over meat of the subsection WATERB 2 5. Not Applicable 3. 10 I. Less than I acre 2es EASE OF PASSAGE 3. 5 4. 10 % OF STREAM SHADED 1. Difficult Thick understory or wet mucky soil 20 2. Moderate Interspersed underoils 0. Less than 10% 3. 50 3. Easy - Open under 630 acres 1. 10 4. 7. 2. 25 5. Not applicable ANIMALS WATERBODY DEPTH 4 letter code and source for each animal. I Less t I. Yes, well drained soils occur in the subsection Source 1. Observed or 21phanfpt 2. soils do not occur in the subsection 2. Reported p, 3. Den. Nest or Spoor SAMPLING -FORM VEGETATION b- T ,P . 3% T.1 /Site No. /S.-,.@t *,' "TP. I I vo I 18111-311rjoI01012171 1717-1710 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 Species Tally LAYER 'Ibl.Cov.)WI Species co,,./,-,... C 0 Z) 2 t1l, C 0 v.,A<0eA1, C 0 % cov.,6eAl. cov Cov. 1 canopy 17 y7 1 2.15- 2- 2. understory 3. shrub 25 17 4. herb 33 33 1/ 3 5- 3 X 3 5-1 1 5, 41 00 1 0 &.4 6.- 0 $4 5- IMPORT 49 01 / 0_v Bir, 0 v - 1 unique or rare 67 13 1 ;t zfee H" . ?: endangered 65 2. 5- 7 2 /1 a,,,. A, 73 d 7 d Algk G.- 6VERAGE AVERAGE I f _8F2 (9-16 Blank) A COVER DBH -17- 31Y 61;2 - 0 0-5 1=1-411 25- - I - 1-10 2=4-6" 33 -1 If 13 3 1 Acr aw 3 2-20 3=6-9" 41 5, 15-1-4 0 1 0 3-30 4=9-12" 49 1 & 7 13 0 -r- 7,ji 0 - 4-4o 5=12-18" 5-50 6=18-24" 57 ?4 13 0 6-6o T=24-30" 65- 3-11- _L A110 /I/. a le T-70 8=30-36" 73 R. 1 8-80 9= >36" 1 8 3 (9-16 Blank) 9-90 17 11 ZeL4 C otle e ;2z ANIMALS: 25 S' 3 3. f 0.;S 0 . 1 0 3@ _L -7- si__ I 41 0 L; a. S 49 01 J-- c X L - A, 4e; t 0 0 @P* 57 Y 8. S_-,rj 65 F crv@ 73 NOTES: '@p..ies 0 5" Z M. 4m aw, AUDITORY AND VISUAL EXPERIENCE. WETLAND WILDLIFE RATING. 1ndicate The Experience Characteristics of The Entire Area. Circle Class Richncss the appropriate word on the data sheet for each evaluation. Where indicated, enter the code in the blank preceding selected evaluations. p1 5 . Add the numerical codes for a Total Score. Dominant Class a / Auditory Size (p/ Noise from offsite loud i2p. Nature of offsite noise intermittent co Site Type Visual 4x 3.0 Cover Type ix Typical length of views long intermediate short< Typical nature of views panoramas enclosed -Scale of landscape elements large eixed 3x Surrounding Habitat-% CODE: 3 2 4x 3 e rate i or Open (diversity) of great' moderate little 0 Forest visual elements Salt Marsh 3 Views of water frequecasional rare/none dscape rapid moderate slow Mining, Waste Disposal change over distance Urban of topography complex intermediate simple 3 Personal impression impressive pleasant unnotew oor Recreation of site Vegetative Interspersion FEE 3x 3. Experience Total Score Juxtaposition (enter in boxes) 2x 3.0 F3 (enter in box) 3. 2. medium Total Score Total ENCODING INSTRUCTIONS gill Al dAAA Samoa= AREA NUMBER Card 1, spaces 3-20. Natural Area Numbers are recorded on the county scale site maps and on the.:folders which correspond to each site.. Record this numl-er on the data form, Where the number is incomplete or a new site is designated, assign numbers according to the following directions. 4V Al 0- R, 4@ 6a, @40 ca 4"Y All 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 110 11 112 13 14 15 16 17 18 [I I I 1 9 T- County Numbers Indicate the County which contains the major portion of the Natural Area. 02. Anne Arundel 08. Cecil 03. Baltimore 09. Charles 04. Baltimore City 13. Harford 05. Calvert 17. Prince Georges 19. St. Mary's Election District Indicate the Election District which cont ains the major portion of the Natural Area. This information is available on the County Topographic Maps. Source We are considered by State Planning's MAGI computer system to be information source #9. -29- Site Number County Site and Field Site Sites have been delineated and numbered on each County Site .Map. Record the number indicated on the map or folder. Natural Areas are given a 4-digit number. The first two digits .refer to the County Site Number. The second two digits refer to the Field Site Number.. County sites are numbered sequentially within the county. Field sites are numbered sequentially within a county site. County sites are separate Natural Areas within a county. Field sites designate contiguous Natural Areas within a county site which, for the purposes of this study, are described as discrete Natural Areas. Where a new Natural Area is designated within a county, assign it a new county site number as the next number in the sequence of county sites. Where a site designated as one Natural Area is determined to be @two or more Natural Areas, assign them Field Site Numbers as the next @numbers in the sequence of field sites with the County Site Number .remaining unchanged. Where two or more sites designated as separate county or field sites are determined to be one Natural Area, combine them under one County Site Number and assign the composite the next Field Site Number in the sequence of field sites. Watershed Number Each watershed and sub--watershed has been numbered by the Mary- land Department of Natural Resources Water Resources Administration. See the attached list and record the watershed number for each Natural Area. ,More Than One Watershed Where a site occurs in more than one watershed, imark an asterisk in space 20. -30- AREA NAME Card 1, spaces 21-57. Sites Already Named Where a site already has a name it should be recorded as given@. on the file folder or in secondary sources of information. Sites Without Names Sites with no names should be given a name which reflects the salient characteristics of the site. Where a site is assigned a name in the field it should be indicated as such with an asterisk before the name. Leave a space between words. For example: 1. *MIXED FOREST WITH RHODODENDRONS 2. *WICOMICO CREEK FRESHWATER MARSH 3. *TALBOT SCARP 4. *PLAINFIELD NATURAL SPRINGS 5. *NATURAL UNDISTURBED LOBLOLLY PINE STAND 6. *REGENERATING BALD CYPRESS FOREST 7. *NORTHERN LIMIT OVERCUP OAY. STAND *ELK NECK CLIFFS -31- ,DATE card 1, 58-63. Indicate the month, day, and year on which the Natural Area was field checked. Month 05. May M. June 07. July 08. August 09. September 10. October NEAREST TOWN Card i, spaces 64-80. 6sing a county scale map as a source,find the town nearest to the I Natural Area by straight line distance. Print the name in the spaces provided, using abbreviations when necessary. W@-- WhARE MORA- m ISO m m ELEVATION Card 2, spaces 3-6. Using the county topographic maps, indicate the elevation of the Natural Area in feet. Where one contour interval crosses the site, record its number as the elevation. Where more than one interval crosses the site or the site falls between contour intervals, record the average as the elevation. Right justify the elevation, leaving blanks before the numbers. GEOLOGY Card 2, spaces 7-9. Indicate the predominant geological formation which underlies the Natural Area using the Geologic Map of Maryland, 1968. Record the code number in the first two spaces. If more than one formation underlies the area, place an asterisk (*) in the third space. 01. bgb, Baltimore Gabbro Complex 02. jb, James Run Gneiss 03. Km, Magothy Formation 04. Kma, Matawan Formation 05. Kmo, Monmouth Formation 06. Kp, Potomac Group 07. pCbg, Baltimore Gneiss 08. Pzgg, Gunpowder Granite 09. Pzpd, Port Deposit Gneiss 10. Qdu, Quaternary Deposits 11. Ql, Lowland Deposits, 12. Qtu, Qu, Upland Deposits 13. Sf, Setters Formation 14. Ta, Aquia Formation 15. Tc, Calvert Formation 16. Tch, Choptank Formation 17. Tn, Nanjemoy Formation 18. Ts, St. Mary's Formation 19. Vc, Volcanic Complex 20. wbg, Boulder Gneiss more than one formation OWNE, RSHIP Card 2, spaces 10 and-11. Indicate who is the principal owner by recording the appropriate code in the left s ace. If the area is owned by more than one party, indicate by pla i P cing an asterisk in the second space on the right. Ownership 1. Private Individual 2. Corporation 3. Educational Institution 4. Private or Non-Profit Public Organization 5. Local Government 6. State Government 7. Federal Government 8. Unknown More than one owner -36- BIBLIOGRAPHY Card 2, spaces 12-29. Indicate the identification number of any,bibliographic citations which relate to the Natural Area. Spaces are provided for citing 6 references. This information is initially available on the site file folder for.the following references. Encode the numbers which pertain to the source initials found on the outside of the folder. Bibliography 034 - Brush 216 - CNAM 207 - CT 124 - HA 2o4 - jA 2o6 - jAE 28o - PA 302 - PLOM 310 - SM 3o8 - smPA 314 - sNAAcP 220 - SP 120 - WA 252 - WE If you become aware of other studies not listed in the folder with information pertaining to the Natural Area, record the.citation as shown in the enclosed sample and give it a discrete number according to the county as follows: County 401-430 Anne Arundel 431-460 Baltimore 461-490 Baltimore City 491-520 Calvert 521-550 Cecil 551-580 Charles 581-610 Harford 611-640 Prince Georges .641-670 St. Mary's -37- Sample: Bibliography Master Sheet IBM INTERNATIONAIL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION X24-23X 80-COLUMN..CARD PUNCH LAYOUT Pri"%d in U. S. Leave 1 & 2 Blank (Book) (Publication Date) (Limit .4 . . )-@, 33 035 3613 36 39 4 41 42 43 3 67 69.7 71 72 73 74 75"I6 77 ?of? 1 2 3 41,3 6 1 7' 0 9 10 IJI 1 131141 15'16117 to is 2 21 22i 23 24 25 2612d26124 31 3 4 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 32 33 54 SS 56 57 59 39 60 61 67 64i 6 I 19:0134184!1. 'L L4/@EYWIElp LT AlAf-P Pzi6lhfl L R 1 3 ElqslT-,Feljv Syoqg F C9 Sid IS 41013,618;AiLl a 1# 5 #,0PxrVS1-f T @d 25'PP wlrlr// meA.-j- I I H separate 2 spaces (Title (Place and before@ and after) a) publishe T' -T I" I la 0 r@ 0 Cd0 0 a) 0 0 w co H r. !31 I I 1 -P -P F4 0 r. 0 F-f a) 0 (1) Cd -441 rd 0 4.3 71_@rcf 0 T Article (Author, Last Name First itle + "in@, (Article) :721AAA/r,go iA11Y1 @W A@ 111,?W I 191a[r4LV1i1A441 FR lg@l IaIF Y1.4 IR I Y 4 1A I 5 I .7.2@1'8t@4'STW !N 5 149 2@X P 9 0 jC[D 6 5 4 P Al A S C 2, 6 NC 6 S hlr A v ot RLIL to Al? ra pqrE om R .4 R S 11 E C r f S 1. (Publication Titl IT- I I Y -160 201- IT32 33 43 47i [49 53 54 $3156157158139 I T23 4 15 161 III I 9110111112 21 22 ZT27 243 31 40 41 4214314 48 61 "I 6P1 7jo III' 721 73'7--@73 @167; 78 79 14115 SITE SOURCES The areas selected as candidates for field investigation were chosen and mapped from the following sources. The initials, preceding each reference are those which are recorded on the site folders to indicate site source and to reference background information. Brush Brush, Grace and M. Katherine Poese, 1975 and 1976. Personal Communications. Following a field study of sampling and mapping forest vegetation in Maryland, these areas were nominated for study as potential Natural Areas. Usually, these are mapped as general areas which require further refinement in the field. CNAM 1968. Catalog of Natural Areas in Maryland. Maryland State Planning Department. The purpose of this document was to briefly present some basic information on certain Natural Areas within the state of Maryland. Areas having unique historical, geological, or ecological value or a combination of such values were represented in this catalog. "Whenever possible the areas selected had to be in a natural state or near natural condition and not show evidence of recent disturbances that would impair their value." These areas were not field checked. CT Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Forest Service. 1976. State Champion Trees. Personal Communication. HA - Harris, Herbert S. Jr. 1976. The Natural History Society of Md., Inc. Personal Communication, Known locations of endangered reptiles and amphibians in Maryland. JA - Jackson, William. 1973. Chesapeake Bay: Inventory of Potential Shoreline Access, Recreation and Open Space Areas. Part I: The West Shore. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Program Planning and Evaluation section. (Unpublished) This study was undertaken in the summer of 1972 to identify areas with the potential to provide public recreation, open space, or water access. Sites described and mapped by this study are included for study as potential Natural Areas. JAE Jackson, William. 1973. Chesapeake Bay: Inventory of Potential Shoreline Access, Recreation,and Op@n7@Tace Areas. Part II: The East Shore. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Program Planning and Evaluation section. (Unpublished) Companion volume to Part I: The West Shore. Areas in Cecil, County are included in this volume. NA U.S. Navy, Planning Division, Chesapeake Division. 1975. Personal Communication. Navy bases with significant forested areas to be checked for Natural Areas. -39- 'PA Public lands taken from areas mapped in green on the county topo maps and areas proposed for acquisition by Department of Natural Resources, Land Planning Services. PtOM - Shreve, Forrest. 1910. The Plant Life of Maryland. Maryland Weather Service, Johns Hopkins Press.. This volume describes the distribution of plant life in Maryland. Potential Natural Areas mentioned in this were chosen for study in the field survey. SM 1974. Natural Areas of the Chesapeake Bay Region: Ecological Priorities. Center for Natural Areas, Ecology Program, Smithsonian Institution. The purpose of the study was to recommend for procurement those Natural Areas which Smithsonian personnel judged to be of highest priority for preservation. This survey made use of information already available. Preliminary field checks were made on 30 percent of the designated areas. SMPA - Smithsonian Center for Natural Areas, 1973. "Areas Currently Protected" mapped on 1:250,000 scale Chesapeake Bay Region map. Conservation areas other than military sites were taken from this map. SNAACP 1974. Survey of Natural Areas of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Center for Natural Areas, Office of International and Environmental Programs, Smithsonian Institution. This survey mapped and described selected Natural Areas on the coastal plain between Georgia and Massachusetts. Sites were mapped on quad scale maps for use by the National Park Service. @P 1975. Compendium of Natural Features Information. Maryland Department of State Planning. This compendium serves as an update of the Catalog of Natural Areas in Marylanai The Natural Areas were briefly described and mapped at a scale of 1:63,360. These sites were not field checked. @A Abbott, Jack. 1976; 1976 Eagle Nest Surve . Cooperative project pu with Maryland Wildlife Administra-tion.@@ A@Un lished) Bald eagle nest sites field checked yearly. WE 1968. State Wetlands Inventory. Cooperative project, Department of Game and Inland Fish, Department of State Planning. (Unpublished) Most of these wetlands were not field checked and any information concerning them should be considered unverified. CURRENT USE Card 2, spaces 30 and 31. Indicate the current major use of the Natural Area. Current Use 01. Recreation 02. Vehicular Traffic (i.e. motor bikes) 03. Trails 04. Hunting 05. Wildlife Management 06. Timber Management 07. Single Home 08. Several Homes 09. Swimming 10. Fishing 11. Boating 12. Pasture 13. Agriculture 14. Woodlots 15. Dumping 16. Other 17. None SECURITY Card 2, space 32. Indicate the probable time frame within which significa-it:"physical alterations by man's activities may occur. Assess all facets of an area which may contribute toward the encroachment or destruction of the Natural Area. Security 1. Threatened with destruction wit hin five years. a. areas currently being disturbed by man (i.e. channelization, siltation, logging, construction) b. areas currently under plan to be altered (i.e. sewer lines, homes) c. areas contiguous with new development, highway interchanges d. areas zoned commercial, residential, industrial 2. Areas safe for five years. a. areas not currently threatened with destruction, but not currently protected 3. Areas safe indefinitely. a. areas owned by conservation organizations, designated as wildlife management areas or parks. 4. Unknown. ACCIESS. Card 2, space 33. Indicate the ease of approach to the Natural Area. Access 1. Easy - Major highway or road to site 2. Moderate Trail to site 3. Difficult Isolated area, no road or trail to the site SITE TYPE Card 2, space 34. The Site Type refers to the general or dominant characteristic of the Natural Area. It attempts to answer the question "Why was this site designated as a Natural Area?" Where more than one type occurs within an arealist that type which is of greater significance to the Natural Area or is of greater regional significance. IlCultural site" should be used to indicate a site of historical or archeological importance. "Champion Tree" should be used to indicatff-sites with a designated or potential "National" or "State Champion Tree." Site Type 1. Water Body 2. Upland Deciduous Forest 3. Lowland Deciduous Forest 4. Upland Evergreen Forest 5. Lowland Evergreen Forest 6. Upland Mixed Forest 7. Lowland Mixed Forest 8. Cultural Site 9. Champion Tree -42- INTEGRITY Card 2, space 35. Indicate the present "Natural Integrity" of the area on the basis of natural regeneration, age, and the absence of disturbance. Integrity 1. Naturally Permanent - Vegetation or physical feature is relatively stable as revealed by the pattern of regeneration or the absence of physical deterioration. Disturbance is insignificant although some natural disturbance may be in evidence. Vegetation is mature or relatively stable because of its ability to resist succession. 2. Naturally Transitory - Vegetation or pbysical feature is changing due to plant succession either as a, conseq@icnce of man-made or natural disturbance such as fire, erosion or flooding. Vegetation is relatively young and dynamic. 3. In Need of Management - Area will require management to maintain present character. 4. Uncertain Possible source of change is not evident. OCCURRENCE Card 2, space 36. Indicate the relative frequency of the Natural Area in the context of its occurrence on the Western Shore Coastal Plain. Where an unusual feature occurs within the area or where the Natural Area provides the habitat for a particular plant or animal which is -in some way rare, un ._q,11e, or unusual, then "Occurrence" shall be defined in terms of this feature, plant, or anim@,:. Occurrence 1. Common - Physical features or organism freque ntly encountered in the region. 2. Infrequent - Physical features or organism not commonly found are present; however, none are rare, endangered or unique. 3. Rare - Natural area containing an unusual physical feature or organism which is rare, endangered or at the geographic limit of its distribution. 4. Singularly Unique - Natural area containing a physical feature, organism or special habitat for an organism for which the area is the only known location in which it occurs. -43- SIZE Card 2, spaces 37-40. Record the size of the Natural Area in acres. Include all areas designated as subsections so that the total acreage of.the subsections equals that recorded for the site. Right justify the area, leaving blanks before the numbers. Use the dot grid to determine the number of acres on the aerial photo- graphs. A dot grid (provided in the notebook) is a transparent overlay with dotsi systematically arranged on a grid pattern. In use, the grid is aligned witha straight line feature to avoid positioning bias and then dots or squares are tallied for the area., Follow the instructions on the transparent overlay Photo Scale 1:20,000 1 inch = 1667 feet 1 dot = 0.996 acres no. dots counted x 0.996 acres/dot = no. acres 1:31,68o 1 inch 2,640 feet (Cecil County) 1 dot 2.5 acres no. dots counted x 2.5 acres/dot no. acres AVE R AGUNE WIDTH Card 2, space 41. Indicate the "Average Width" of the Natural Areas measured on the aerial photographs. Average Width 1. Disjunct - Area is broken into segments 2. Less than 200 feet 3. 200-400 feet 4. 4oo-6oo feet 5. 6oo-8oo feet 6. 800-1000 feet 7. 1000-1200 feet 8. Greater 1200 feet Photo Scale 1:20,000 J inch = 1,667 feet 0.12 inches = 200 feet 1:31,68o 1 inch = 2640 feet (Cecil County) 0.07 inches = 200 feet 1:15,84o 1 inch = 1,320 feet (Xerox photos, 0.15 inches = 200 feet Cecil County) -44- FOREST EDGE Card 2, space 42. Using the aerial photographs as a source, indicate the relative length of forest/oPening edge which occurs along the forested portions of the Natural Area. Forest Edge 1. Minimal - Forested portions of the site occurring essentially as a single block 'with a minimum of forest/opening edge. 2. Moderate - Forested portions of the site somewhat dissected or occurring as a single block with internal openings resulting in a moderate amount of forest/opening edge. 3. High - Forested portions of the site highly dissected, occurring in narrow strips and/or including numerous enclosed openings resulting in a substantial amount of forest/opening edge. 4. Not applicable - No forested subsections. The interface between forest and opening contributes to the value of an area as wildlife habitat as well as enhances its scenic qualities. For the purpose of this parameter, "opening" is defined as an open water or vegetated area with less than ten percent cover of canopy or understory trees contiguous with or enclosed by forest. "Forest" pertains to the portions of the site described as subsections with vegetation types numbered 1 through 104. -45- W&@ M6kmk&N6. lq@ SILAALI@, L 1"&@ kjbk&LJ w, A A CONTIGUOUS LAND USE Card 3. spaces 3-18. Four sets of four spaces are provided for indicating the 4 major Contiguous Land Uses and the percent of the Natural krea's border on which each use occurs. In the first two spaces of each set indicate the percent of border and in the second pair of spaces encode the land use. The total of the four percentages need not equal one hundred percent. Where land use 01, "Natural krea" is encoded, this adjacent area must be described as a separate site. Contiguous Land Use 01. Natural krea 02. Wetland 03. Water Body 04. Park 05. old Field 06. Managed Forest 07. kgriculture 08. Wildlife Management 09. Road 10. Highway 11. Railroad 12. Residential 13. Commercial 14. Industrial 15. Recreational 16. Town 17. Channelized Stream 18. Right of Way 19. Dredge Spoil Disposal -49- AOUAtIC BUFFER ZONE Card 3, space 19. Aquatic buffer zones are important in protecting aquatic'systems from@erosion and from contamination by non-point source pollutants such as sediment, fertilizer, and pesticides.. A detailed description of the various aspects of the aquatic buffer zone concept is included in the field notebook. For the purposes of this study, a buffer zone is a band of vegetation contiguous with an aquatic system. An aquatic system is defined as a wetland, watercourse, or water body, and adjacent soils with D or D+ runoff potential. i + D and D soils are included in aquatic systems because +they contribute signifi- cant,overland runoff to storm flow. A list of D and D soils by county is included in the field notebook. The value a Natural Area has as an aquatic buffer depends on the width and length of vegetation that it provides along its border with aquatic systems. These aquatic systems may be included or contiguous: part of, enclosed by, or adjacent to the Natural Area. 'indicate the width of vegetation within the Natural Area which occurs along@more than 66% of the vegetation/aquatic system edge. Encode the lowest numbered category which fits the Natural Area. Aquatic Buffer Zone 1. Adequate - the Natural Area provides a band'of natural or successional vegetation greater than 300 feet in width along more than 66% of the border of included or contiguous aquatic systems (wetlands, watercourses, or waterbodies and adjacent D or D+ soils). 2. Questionable - the Natural Area provides a band of natural or successional vegetation greater than 50 feet in width along more than 66% of the border of included or contiguous aquatic systems. 3. Inadequate - the Natural Area provides a band of natural or successional vegetation less than 50 feet in width along more than 66% of the border of included or contiguous aquatic systems. 4. Not Applicable Photo Scale 1:20,000 1 inch = 1,667 feet 0.18 inches = 300 feet 1:31,68o 1 inch = 2,640 feet (Cecil County) 0.11 inches = 300 feet 1U5,84o 1 inch = 1,320 feet (Xerox Photos, 0.22 inches = 300 feet Cecil County) -50- Example: Aquatic Buffer Zone Without D, D+ SoilS With D, D+ SoilS stream Stream atural Area \,,atural Area P, Y- ADEQUATE j 3 00-.-J.". Stream Stream 7 % :;atural D Area Are NaLural a QUESTIONABLE J,- J! Stream Stream ,o ;atural Area ;7- ,4atural Area J @7 INADEQUATE 60, y y .y < NO. OF COMMUNITY TYPES Card 3, spaces 20 and 21. A diversity of community types contributes to a Natural Area's scenic, recreational, and wildlife habitat values. Indicate the number of community types'present in the Natural Area. Distinct vegetation communities should each be counted as I community type. These are normally equivalent to areas designated as subsections or sets of similar subsections. Where water bodies or tidal wetlands are contiguous with or enclosed by the Natural Area, but are no;t included as subsections, each water body type or wetland type should be counted as one community type. COMMUNITY DIVERSITY Card 3, space 22. Indicate the relative number of different vegetation communities and other natural features which the Natural Area contains. Community Diversity 1. High - contains numerous different vegetatio n communities, animal habitats or physical features such as streams, bogs, scarps. 2. Medium - contains a few different vegetation types and habitats or features. 3. Low - contains predominantly one vegetation community or natural feature. -52- AUDITORY & VISUAL 'EXPERIENCE Card 3, spaces 23 and 24. Complete the form titled "Auditory and,Visual Experience" for the Natural Area. Encode the "Experience Total Score" in the spaces designated on the data form. @Card 3, space 25.' Indicate the Experience Term which the field crew feels most closely describes the Natural Area's Auditory and Visual Experience characteristics relative to other Natural Areas on the Western Shore Coastal Plain. Experience Term 1. Low 2. Medium 3. High WETLAND WILDLIFE RATING Card 3, spaces 26 and 27. Complete the "Wetland Wildlife Rating" form and encode the re'sulting score in the spaces provided, rounding to the nearest whole number. Instructions for completing the form are included in the notebook under the tab entitled "Wetlands." Complete this form and record the score for all Natural Areas containing one or more of the wetland classes described in the instructions. Included or contiguous open water areas not described'as subsections should be included as a wetland class. Otherwise,, this rating pertains only to.wetlands included in the Natural Area. -53- CATEGOR]ES Card 3 spaces 28-39. 'Indicate-the three categories which punctuate the most interesting, unusual or most descriptive characteristic of the Natural Area. The priority forchoosing a category should follow the general rule of .... rare, endangered, unusual, interesting-descriptive. All three categories need not be filled out@; however, the Primary and Secondary Categories should be filled out whenever possible. Record the number listed on the Category Code Sheets which areincluded in the fieldnotebook under the tab labeled ",Categories." Use the first four spaces.labeled "Primary" for the most important characteristics., "Secondary" for the secondmost important, etc. .10NE LINE DESCRIPTION Card 3, spaces 40-76. Card 4, spaces 3-61. Write a brief sentence or phrase describing the salient characteristic of the Natural Area. Youare limited to 98 spaces. Continue this description on Card 4, treating Cards 3 and 4 as one line. For Example: 1. Large and active natural spring 2. Small bog with nearby hiking trails 3. Natural pond, excellent wildlife area 4. Large stand of mixed hardwoods with beech predominating 5. Large bog and pond, unusual vegetation on both 6. Very remote white cedar swamp with rhododendron SITE -NUMBER Card 3, spaces 77-80. Record the site number in the last four spaces on Card 3. This number will automatically be keypunched in the same spaces on Card 4. _54- 91. wm INS oil low TEXT Immediately upon completion or the survey, develop a paragraph fro"' notes and Data Forms which includes the following considerations: a. Unique, distinctive, or characteristic features of the Natural Area. b. Description of the dominant vegetation or, if a mosaic, the types and percent coverage of the Natural Area by each type. c. Characteristic DBH,. any lack of reproduction, obvious trends or vegetation dynamics. d. Disturbances, historical notes. e. Unusual animals, importance of the Natural Area for wildlife, geologic features. f. Role of Natural Area in the coastal zone aquatic system (i.e. buffer, natural spring, site of high erosion). See the Data Form entitled "TEXT." Each line on the Foria will be entered on a separate computer card and will appear on the computer print-out as one line of the paragraph. The County and Field Site Numbers should be entered in the appropriate spaces in the upper right corner of the Data Forms. -57- M, @11'y =Mg OM NAMES Record the names of any people either listed in the folders.or to whom you have spoken with who.have information on the Natural Area or who are very knowledgeable about it. See the Data Form entitled "NAMES." Each line on the Data Form should be used for onename only. The County and Field Site Numbers should be entered ia the appropriate spaces in the upper right corner of the Data Form. all -61- SUBSECTION NUMBER Card 7, spaces 3 and 4. Record the number assigned to the subsection (e.g. 01, 02, 03 SIMILAR SUBSECTIONS Card 7, spaces 5-12. Indicate the subsections which are considered to be "similar subsections." Similar subsections are areas with minor differences in vegetation and comparable water bodies, disturbances and soils. Do not complete an additional Card 7 for the similar subsections. Do complete a vegetation sampling form for each subsection, Where fewer than four similar subsections are designated, leave the unused spaces blank. Card 7, spaces 13-16. AREA OF SUBSECTION Record the area in acres for the subsection or the set of similar subsections. Right justify the acreage, leaving blanks before the numbers. -65- MWAT-E.RBODY DISTANCE -Card space 17. Indicate the straight line distance from the subsection to the nearest waterbody. Where the subsection is a waterbody, encode 1 (same as this subseption) as the distance. Water 'Body Distance 1. Same as this subsection 2. Included or contiguous (1-10.feet) 3. 10-50 feet -100 feet 5. 100-200 feet 4. 50 6. 200-300 feet 7. 300-500 feet 8. Greater than 500 feet -66- WATERBODY TYPE Card 7, spaces 18 and 19. Indicate the Water Body Typ e to which the distance has been recorded. Where one water body is the closest water body for more than one subsection, designate one oil these subsections as subsection 01. Complete theremaining water body, beach, and stream parameters for this subsection. Encode 14 (Same as subsection 01) as the Water Body Type for the other-subsections for which that water body is closest. When "Same as subsection 01" is recorded as the Water Body Type, do not complete the remaining water body, beach, and stream parameters (leave spaces 20 through 26 blank). If more than one Water Body Type is included or contiguous with the Natural Area, indicate different Water Body Types for different subsections so that all included or adjacent types are described. Water Body Type 01. Primary Stream, < 5 feet wide Non-tidal stream with an average width of less than 5 feet. 02. Secondary Stream, 5-30 feet wide Non-tidal stream with an average width of between 5 and 30 feet. 03. Tertiary Stream, > 30 feet wide Non-tidal stream with an average width greater than 30 feet. 04. Tidal Stream Streams with tidal influence which appear as a single blue line on the County Topographic Maps. 05. Sub-Estuary Tidal areas other than the Chesapeake Bay or Potomac River which appear as a light blue signature (indicating width) on the County Topographic Maps 06. Potomac River The Potomac River proper. 07. Chesapeake,Bay The Chesapeake Bay proper. 08. Pond Small enclosed body of freshwater, often artificially formed. 09. Bog Waterlogged spongy accumulation of sphagnum moss which may support herbs such as sedges, rushes or scattered shrubs that cover less than 50 percent of the area. -67- Water Body .Type (Continued) 10. Freshwater Marsh Soils normally covered with between 6 inches and 3 feet of water. Vegetation is usually dominated by robust or marsh emergents. 11. Shrub Swamp Soils are usually waterlogged during the growing season and often covered by standing water. Vegetation is dominated by shrubs including alders, willows, red maple, buttonbush and dogwood. 12. Wooded Swamp Soils are usually waterlogged during the growing season and seasonally covered with up to one foot of standing water. Trees include willow oak, green ash, red maple, bald cypress, black gum, etc. 13. Tidal Wetlands Marshes and swamps which are influenced by the tide. 14. Same.as subsection 01 Closest water body to the subsection is the sane water body as that described with subsection 01. Photo Scale 1:20,000 1 inch = 1,667 feet 0.5 mm = 30 feet 1:31,68o 1 inch = 2,640 feet (Cecil County) 0.3 mm = 30 feet 1:15,84o 1 inch = 1,320 feet (Xerox photos, 0.6 nm = 30 feet Cecil County) -68- WATERBODY SIZE Card space 20. Indicate the size of the water body cited under Water Body Distance. For Water Body Types 01 through 07, encode 7 (Not applicable) under Water Body Size. Where 14 (Same as subsection 01) is encoded for the Water Body Type, leave this space blank. Water Body Size 1. Less than 1 acre 2. 1-5 acres 3. 5-10 acres 4. 10-20 acres 5. 20-30 acres 6. Greater than 30 acres 7. Not applicable WATERBODY DEPTH Card 7, space 21. Indicate whether the water body previously described is greater or less than 1 foot in depth on the average. Where 14 (Same as subsection 01) is encoded for Water Body Type, leave this space blank. Water Body Depth 1. Less than 1 foot 2. Greater than 1 foot -69- "WATERBODY BOTTOM MATERIAL Card'71., space 22. Ind-icat,e the predominant bottom type found in the water body previously des.cri-be& 'Where 14 (same as subsection 01) is encoded forVater Body lype, leave this space blank.. Water Body Bottom Material 1. Peat - fibrous organic material with recognizable plant parts. 2. Muck - black ooze composed of silt and decomposed organic matter. 3. Silt - fine sediment with little organic material. 4. Sand - granular sediment. 5. Gravel - granular sediment with particles larger than 2mm (approximately 1/8 in.). 6. Cobble - round or sub-round, water-worn rock 2@-2-10 inches in diameter. 7. Rock - solid aggregate of minerals larger than a cobble. -70- BEACH TYPE Card 7, space 23. Indicate the beach type which occurs along the water body previously described. Where one of 09 through 13 are encoded for Water Body Type record 5 (Not applicable) for Beach Type. Where 14 (Same as subsection 01) is recorded for the Water Body Type, leave this space blank. Beach Type 1. Bluff steep slope or abrupt embankment along waterbody edge or sandy beach 2. Bank - surrounding area gently sloping to waterbody edge 3. Sandy Beach - low, sloping sandy beach without dunes 4. Dunes - low, sloping sandy beach with dunes 5. Not applicable BEACH LENGTH Card 7, space 24. Indicate the-length of sandy beach which occurs along the water body previously described. Where 14 (Same as subsection 01) is encoded for Water Body Type, leave this space blank. Where no sandy beach occurs on the water body or the Water Body Distance is greater than 10 feet encode 5 (Not applicable) as the Beach Length. Beach Length 1. Less than 500 feet 2. 500-1000 feet 3. 1000-1500 feet 4. Greater than 1500 feet 5. Not applicable -71 BEACH WIDTH Card 7, space 25. Indicate the width of sandy beach which was described under Beach Length. Where Beach Length was left blank leave this space blank. Where Beach Length was encoded as 5 (Not applicable) record the Beach Width as 5 (Not applicable). Beach Width 1. Less than 1 foot 2. 1-10 feet 3. 10@-20 feet 4. Greater than 20 feet 5. Not applicable O/o OF STREAM SHADED Card 7, space 2 Where one of 01 through 04 is encoded for Water Body Type, indicate the percent of the subject stream which is shaded by tree or shrub cover with the sun directly overhead. Where the Water Body Type is not a stream, encode 5 (Not applicable) for % of stream shaded. Where 14 (Same as subsection 01) is encoded for Water Body'Type,,leave this space blank. % of Stream Shaded 0. less than 10% 1. 10-25% 2. 25-50% 3. 50-75% 4. 75-100% 5. Not applicable -72- SOIL TYPE Card 7, spaces 27-30. Record the symbols for the dominant soil type which occurs within the subsection as indicated on the maps in the county soil survey Left register all soil types symbols, leaving blanks after the code. Where a subsection such as a pond which has no soil type recorded on the soil survey, encode "W" in the left most box under "Soil Type." SOIL DRAINAGE Card 7, space 31. Indicate whether well drained soils occur in the subsection. Well drained soil types are listed by symbols under the tab entitled Well Drained Soils in the field notebook. Soil Drainage 1. Yes, well drained soils occur in the subsection. 2. No, well drained soils do not occur in the subsection. -73- VEGETATJON TYPE Card 7, spaces 32-34. Indicate the.vegetation.type which characterizes the subsection.. Forest vegetation types are described in the booklet Forest Cover Types of'North America, Societ .y of American Fo3@esters, 1975. Record the vegetation ty'pe.@ which best' describes the subsection. Vegetation Types 14 Northern pin oak 16 Aspen 21 White pine 23 Hemlock 29 Blackcherry 39 -Bladk'ash-American elm-red maple 40 Post oak-black oak 41 Scarlet oak 44 Chestnut oak 45 Pitch pine 46 Eastern red cedar 47 Eastern red cedar-pine 48 Eastern red cedar-hardwoods 49 Eastern red cedar-pine-hardwoods 50 Black locust 51 White pine-chestnut oak 52 White oak-red-oak-hickory 53 White oak 54 Northern red oak-basswood-white ash 55 Northern red oak 56 Northern red oak-mockernut hickory-sweetgum 57 Yellow poplar 58 Yellow poplar-hemlock 59 Yellow poplar-white oak-northern red oak 60 Beech-sugar maple 61 River birch-sycamore 62 Silver maple-American elm 63 Cottonwood 64 Sassafras-persimmon 65 Pin oak-sweetgum 75 Shortleaf pine 76 Shortleaf pine-oak 77 Shortleaf pine-Virginia pine 79 Virginia pine 78 Virginia pine-southern red oak 80 Loblolly pine-shortleaf pine 81 Loblolly pine 82 Loblolly pine-hardwood -74- Vegetation types continued 87 Sweetgum-yellow poplar 88 'Laurel oaku-willow oak 91 Swamp chestnut oak-cherrybark oak 92 Sweetgum-Nuttal oak-willow oak 93 Sugarberry-American elm-green ash 94 Sycamore-pecan-American elm 95 Black willow 96 Overcup oak-water hickory 97 Atlantic white cedar 98 Pond pine 101 Bald cypress 102 Bald cypress-water tupelo 103 Water tupelo 104 Sweetbay-swamp tupelo-red maple 107 Robust emergents (Typha spp., etc.) 108 Shrub swamp 109 Grasses, sedges, rushes 110 Floating leaved and submerged vegetation 111 Shrub or old field vegetation TOPOGRAPHY Card 7, space 35. Indicate the type of topography which typifies the subsection. Topography 1. Flat - little topographic relief over most of subsection 2. Rolling - hills with slopes < 15% over most of subsection' @3. Ste2k - slopes > 15% over most of'subsection 4. Mixed - flat or rolling topography with significant areas. T>3371) with steep slopes, gorges, or bluffs -75- SOURCE OF DISTURBANCE Card 7, spaces 36-39. Indicate the primary and secondary sources of physical alteration which are evident in the subsection. The first two spaces should be used for encoding the dominant type of disturbance. The co-dominant or less devestating type'should be recorded in the second pair of spaces. Source of Disturbance 1. Channelization 2. Dredging 3. Sewer Outlet 4. Culverts 5. Bulkheading 6. Dikes 7. Dams 8. Change in Watertable 9. Logs and Debris 10. Beaver Dams 11. Algal.Blooms 12. Fedid Odor 13. Siltation 14. Erosion 15. Noise 16. Air Pollution 17. Selective Cutting 18...Clear Cutting 19. Fire 20. Windthrow 21. Disease 22. Litter Accumulation, leaf 23., bumping 24. Littering, paper 25. Vandalism 26. Trampling 27. Motor Vehicles 28. Postagricultural 29. Other 30. None 31. Flooding 32. Grazing -76- DEGREE OF DISTURBANCE Card 7, space 40. Indicate the relative amount, of disturbance which is evident in the subsection as a result of man's actions. Degree of Disturbance 1. Severe mants impact resulting in severe alteration of vegetation or natural feature 2. Moderate.- man.'s impact resulting in moderate alteration of vegetation or natural feature 3. Low man!s impact evident but not significant 4. None evidence of man-made disturbance not present over most of the subsection I)ILIQSAGE Card 7, space 41. Indicate the degree of difficulty a hiker would encounter when walking through the subsection. Ease of Passage 1. Difficult - thick understory or wet mucky soils 2. Moderate - interspersed understory or wet soils 3. Easy open understory, dry soils -77- ANIMALS Card 7, spaces 42-66. Record the code and source for any birds, marnmals, and herptiles which are@known to occur in the subsection. Six sets of five spaces are'provided for citing six species. In the first four spaces of each set, record the four number code for the species. In the fifth space of each set--6ncode whether the animal was observed or heard, reported, or a sign of the species was seen. Where more than 6 species are eligible for citation, encode the more unusual or rare species. If necessary, additional species important to the'Natural Area may be encoded in other subsections. Animals Record 4 number code and source for each animal. Source 1. Observed or Heard 2. Reported 3. Den, Nest or $poor Where known, the residency and frequency of occurence of each animal in Maryland will be automatically printed for each species on the sites' computer printout. These are encoded for your reference with eachlist of species according to the following scheme. Residency 1. Breeding 2. Migratory 3. Winter 4. Year Round Frequency 1. Abundant, common 2. Fairly common, uncommon 3. Rare 4. Endangered -78- SITE NUMBER card 7, spaces 77-80. Record the County Site Number and Field Site Number in the last four spaces of Card 7. -79- in 1 :9 ft@', .MW :-,4f i BA; 'o *A AL @@AoI me SO ow No on., In on VEGETATION SAMPLING Locate sampling stations in areas of each subsection which fairly represent the character of the community as a whole. These sampling stations should be chosen to meet the following criteria: a. The vegetation shall be located on a uniform topographic site, i.e. on the exposure, slope position, and geological substrate. b. The sample area shall generally reflect the character of the mapping unit within which it is located. At each sampling point, first measure basal area by tallying trees with a BAF-10 wedge prism. A properly ground and calibrated prism is merely a tapered wedge of glass that bends or deflects light rays at a specific offset angle. When a tree stem is viewed through such a wedge, the bole appears to be displaced, as if seen through a camera range finder. The prism is rotated above a sampling point for a 360 degree.circle. Use of the prism requires that it be held precisely over the sampling point at all times, for this point and not the observer's eye is the pivot from which the stand is swept. All tree stems not completely offset at 4.5 feet above the ground when viewed through the wedge are counted; others are not tallied. Trees that appear to be borderline should be measured and checked with the appropriate plot radius factor before arbitrarily deciding to tally every other borderline stem. A tree which forks below 4.5 feet is tallied as two trees; a tree which forks above 4.5 feet is counted as one. 'The prism may be held at any convenient distance from the eye, provided it is always positioned directly over the sampling point. Proper orientation also requires that the prism be held in a vertical position.and at right angles to the line of sight; otherwise, large errors in the tree tally may result. A complete explanation of point sampling and instructions for using the wedge prism are included in the reprint following the sampling instructions. Record the number of trees counted at each sample point on the "Vegetation Sampling Form" in the box marked "Tally" above the proper sample number. At the completion of the survey, record the total number of trees counted in each subsection and the number of basal area samples taken in the proper boxes at the top of the "Vegetation Sampling Form." A Basal Area.Factor-10 prism has an offset angle of 104.18 min. With this viewing angle, all trees no farther than 33 times their diameter from the sample point a're tallied. As a result of this relationship, each tree counted represents 10 square feet of basal area/acre at 4.5 feet above the ground. (Basal area is the cross sectional area of a tree stem.) For each subsection, the computer will divide the total number of trees tallied by the number of sample points and multiply this quotient by 10 toget the basal area/acre of the subsection in square feet. This will give an idea of the relative density of trees in different subsections. The number of trees counted in each subsection using the prism is dependent on both the diameter of the trees in the stand and their spacial distribution. The accuracy of the resulting basal area measurement is -83- dependent on the variability of these two factors. For this reason, diverse stands require a higher sampling intensity than even-aged stands of low diversity. As a rule of thumb, a minimum of 4 samples is required for a monotypic, single- aged stand such as a pine plantation; up to 10 samples are required for mixed- aged stands with a diversity of species such as a mixed hardwood forest. As a representation of the species composition of each subsection, the vegetation should be described for each physiognomic strata. The canopy is the highest forest layer. The understory is composed of trees of intermediate height. The shrub layer lies below the understory and is generally composed of species with multiple stems less than 20 feet tall. The herb layer is within a few feet of the ground but may contain woody species such as partridgeberry, poison ivy, etc. Where vines extend into the canopy and understory, record them with the herb layer and note them in the text. Estimate and record percent cover by species for each layer under the appropriate sample point number on the "Vegetation Sampling Form." Record average DBH (Diameter Breast Height diameter at 4.5 feet above the ground) for the canopy species. Record this information at a sufficient number of sampling points to adequately reflect the coniposition of the community. Generally, fewer of these samples will be required than basal area samples, but a basal area sample should be taken at each of these vegetation sample points. At the completion of the survey, average the DBH,and percent cover estimates for each species and record these in the proper spaces at the left of the "Vegeta- tion Sampling Form." Average the percent cover for each layer and note these at the top. Encode the layer for each species and note impact where applicable. Finally, encode the number for each species as found on the lists which follow in the notebook. If conditions do not permit doing Basal area samples and no prism samples are taken, leave "No. Samples" and "Total Tally" blank. Do not put "O"Is in these spaces. An "0" should only be used in "No. Samples" if 10 samples are taken. -84- Reprinted from: Avery, Eugene T. Ph.D. 1967. Forest Measurements. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. POINT-SAMPLE TIMBER CRUISING A NEW ANGLE TO CRUISING 10-1 The concept of point sampling. In its elementary form, point sampling is merely a method of selecting trees to be tallied -on the basis of their sizes rather than by their frequency of occurrence Sample "points," somewhat analogoins to plot centers, are randoinqly or systematically located within a forested tract, and a simple prism or angle quage that subtends a fixed angle of view is used to "sight in" each tredbh. Tree holes close enough to tile observation point to com- pletely fill the fixed sighting angle are tallied; steins too small or too far away are ignored. Thus the probability of tallying any given tree is proportional to its BA, and consequently more time is spent on larger, high-valuqe trees than is the case with conventional strip or line-plot cruising. The concept of point sampling wqas developed and first reported 165 1948 by Walter Biterlich, a forest engineer of Salzburg, Austria. The ing angle chosen, in turn, is largely based on the average size and dis- Introduction and adowption of the method in North America were largely tribution of trees to be sampled. Furthermore, from the standpoint of due to the efforts of Lewis R. Grosenbaugh, a biometrician with the subsequent volume computations, it is desirable to select a sighting angle U.S. Forest Sercice. Groenbaugh recognized the potetialities of the having a BAF that can be expressed as a whole number rather than angel-guage idea and expanded it into a complete inventory system that as a fractional number. has largely supplanted strip and line-plot cruising in many regions. In In Eastern United States, a predetermined sighting angle of 104.48 the United States, the technique is usually referred to as the Bitterlich min (BAF of 10 sq ft per acre) is commonly used in second-growth system of sumply as point sampling. These two terms are generally sawtimber or dense pole-timber stands. Critical angles of 73.66 min (BAF favored ober variable-plot sampling or plotless cruising. 5) and 147.34 min (BAF 20) are often employed for light-density pole stands and for large, old-growth sawtimber, respectively. With small, 10-2 The basal area approach. Point sampling does not require meas- scattered stems, the sighting angle is narrowed so that it will extend urements of either plot areas or tree diameters. If a predetermined basal farther out for trees of minimum diameter; conversely, where large tree atea factor (BAF) of 10 sq ft per acre is assumed and a toral of 75 trees diameters are common, the angle is enlarged to reduce excessively heavy is tallied on 15 sample points, the average of fice trees per point multi- field tallies. plied by 10 provides a BA estimate of 50 sq ft per acre. The well-estab- lished relationship between tree BA and volumes also makes it feasible to use point sampling for obtaining conventional timber inventory data when "counted" trees are recorded by merchantable or total height classes. 10-3 Selecting a sighting anle. BA conversion factors are dependent on the sighting angle (or "critical angle") arbitrarily selected. the sight- -86- TABLE 10-1 Common Basal Area Factors and Angle Sizes Used in 49.5' 66' Point Sampling SAMPLING POINT Basal Ratio (tree area Angle size, Angle size, diameter to Plot radius 6" DIAM 12" DIAM 18" DIAM 24" DIAM factor min diopters plot radius) factor 16.5' 33' 1 32.94 0.96 1/104.4 8.696 2 46.59 1.36 1/73.8 6.149 3 57.06 1.66 1/60.2 5.021 4 65.89 1.92 1/52.2 4.348 5 73.66 2.14 1/46.7 3.889 10 104.18 3.03 1/33.0 2.750 15 127.59 3.71 1/26.9 2.245 20 147.34 4.29 1/23.3 1.944 25 164.73 4.79 1/20.9 1.739 30 180.46 5.25 1/19.0 1.588 35 194.92 5.67 1/17.6 1.470 40 208.38 6.07 1/16.5 1.375 50 232.99 6.79 1/14.8 1.230 FIG. 10-1 Ratio of tree diameter to plot radius for 60 255.23 7.44 1/13.5 1.123 BAF 10. Adapted from Hovind and Rieck. 1961. SOURCE: Hovind and Rieck. 1961. Depending on the region, average tree size, and amount of underbrush The reason for this is that each stem and its imaginary zone "represent" a definite part of an acre and a specific number of trees per acre, depend- restricting line-of sight visibility, the BAF is usually chosen to provide ing on its size. The derivation of values for 6-in.- and 12-in.-dbh trees an average tally of 5 to 12 trees per sample point. In Western United in Table 10-2 provides an explanation or "proof" of this theory. States where larger timber predominates, a BAF of 20 to 60 is in com- mon use. For "West Side" Douglas fir, a BAF of 40 might be regarded Considering the 6-in. dbh first, its imaginary "plot" radius is read as typical, but an instrument with a BAF of 20 would be more frequently from Table 10-2 as 16.50 ft. This hypothetical zone represents an imagi- nary plot of 0.0196 acre around each 6-in.-dbh stem (column 3 of encountered in sampling stands of "East Side" ponderosa pine. 10-4 Plot radius factor. To illustrate the meaning of BA conversions listed in Table 10-1, a sighting angle of 104.18 min (BAF 10) may be presumed. As this angle can also be defined by placing a 1-in. horizontal intercept on a sighting base of 33 in. (column 4 of Table 10-1.), it follows that all trees located no farther than 33 times their diameter from the sample point will be tallied. Accordingly, a 1-in. dbh tree must be within 33 in. of the point, a 12-in.-dbh tree will be tallied up to 396 in. (33.0 E ft) away, and a 24-in. or 2-ft-dbh tree will be recorded up to a distance of 66 ft (Fig. 10-1). This 1:33 ratio of tree diameter to plot radius, a constant for the specified angle of 104.18 min, has a value of 2.75 0G ft (33- 12) when expressed as a "plot radius factor." Thus for each full inch added to stem diameter, a tree can be 2.75 ft farther from the sample point and still be tallied. HOW POINT SAMPLING WORKS 10-5 Imaginary free zones. As the plot radius factor for BAF 10 has F been developed in the preceding section, all subsequent explanations of point-sampling theory and tree volume conversions in this chapter will 0q0 presume a sighting angle of 104.18 min and a BAF of 10 sq ft per acre. Nevertheless, the underlying principles discussed may be applied to any other angle or BAR Because each tree "sighted in" must be within 33 times its diameter of the sample point to be tallied, it is convenient to presume that all FIG. 10-2 Imaginary zones proportional to stem diam- trees are encircled with iiuatqnarv zones whose radii are exactly 33 times eter and encircling each tree determine the diameter of each tree stem. All these imaginary circles that enconi- which trees will be tallied at a given point. pass a given sampling point oil the ground repressent trees to be tallied Adapted from Houind and Rieck, 1961. (Fig. 10-2). Thus tile probability of tallying any given tree is propor- tional to its stem 13A. A 12-in. dbli has four times the probability of Table 10-2). By dividing 0.0196 into 1.00 acre, it can be seen from bein, counted as a 6-in.-dbli steni. Stated in another way, tile chances column 4 that there can be 51.02 such areas fitted into a single acre. of tallving one 12-in.-cibli tree are the -same as that of encountering Thus when one 6-in.-dbh tree is tallied, it is tacitly assumed that there four 6-in.-Albll tre-. are 51.02 such stems per acre. Accordingly, the BA of a 6-IN.-dbh tree 70-6 Equality of trees on a per acre basis. For the sighting angle of (0.196 sq ft from column 5), multiplied by 51.02 trees per acre, yields 104.18 min, each tallied tree (regardless of its size or relative position the "constant" BAF of 10 sq ft per acre (column 6). For 12-in.-dbh stems, the imaginary plot radius is 33.00 ft, and the to the sampling point) represents 10 sq ft of BA on a per acre basis. 168 FOREST MEASUREMENTS POINT-SAMPLE TIMBER CRUISING 169 0 TABLE 102 Derivation of the Basal Area Factor o 10 S Ft Per Acre for tal inrp at the Other. To 4abfiAi Point Sampn inin (B.\],- 1()@, all int(@r(,,pt wide oil I be czlsik (oi. othcr factor ry 1'ree per I Basal Basal area in(- to rat .lo@ p] Tr Ibi 11 11111gina t:;a,inarv ',r acre, .0vided ill Table 10-1. 0Re8ga in. )1ot radills, o@sizv, ztere p @ee per the sl.E,,htjIj,r @11()Ul(j I)e at lea@t 24 in. 61( ft n of S* ellis S(i ft S ft to keep both tlic intercept and the tree in (4)t (6) .0) (5) -hen the @tick -ati,e 1.@ itcd. all tree diain counted; tlio@ are i-nore 4 11.00 0 00S7 114.94 0.087 10 angle ai e sinallei ZD -cept Shout t6.50 0.0196 51-02 0.196 10 exact IV the wzalllc size as the ilitel Is 22-00 0.0349 2S 65 0.349 10 their exact dbli and distance from the sam 10 27 _50 0.0545 1 S.35 1). 545 10 dbli and the appropriate plot radiuss factor 6(2 12 33.00 0.07S5 12.74 0.78.5 10 whether the tree is "in," "out," or a bordei 4 38.50 0. 10619 9.35 1 . 069 10 trees are rare, but if they are encountered 44-00 0. 1396 7.16 1.396 10 1, ", tree. 49.50 0. 1 5.66 1.767 10 With a stick gatige, the observer@s eye r I C sighting angl(-: lience the 1@tick inust be, piv( 20 55.00 0. 2 IS2 4.58 2.182 10 - n 22 60. 50 0.2640 3.79 2.640 10 exact point for a correct tree tallv. When 24 4@6 00 0. 3142 3.1S 3. 142 10 by a particular individual, the stick -au,e 26 71.50 0.36,,7 2.71 3.13S7 10 as other niore expcn@ive point-@anipling 0de 28 77.00 0.4276 2.34 4.276 10 pole stands and where heavy underbru0Al is e is often ea@ier to u@e than more @Ophisticated r 30 82 W 0.4901) 2.04 4.909 10 32 88.00 0. 55S5 4.79 5.585 10 10-8 The Spiegel relascope. -This i@@ a vers 34 93. 50 0.6305 1.59 6. 305 10 developed foi- point sampling by Walter B0itt 36 99. 01) 0. 7069 1.41 7, 069 W ruc-ed device that rnav be uSe2dfor det crillini lt d of rr2 10 di meters, tree hci(,ht@, horizontal distances o dbli X 2. 75 oA)05454D2 colunin 4 X 5 11 n vlultin 43,561) plot size tion for slope, and inea-@urenleilt of @Aope 1t value for- 1111111hei-of troe-@ per:ivre maY %%ir.% sliglItlY. tjep(!jj(1in,,, upon number topog"raphic @@Cak-- siphtilig all"0A- are prov0i( of lcial plnco-s expresse(l for imaginary plot size. or 40, ind the instrument automatically coi The base has .1 tripod socket for U-se when implied plot size is 0-078.5 acre. OnIv 12.74 trees per aCI-C are as@unie*d- rnent@z- are desired. Fi,@tabll:Aiiiient of nnale@ with t6he appomate1v One-fOlIrtll the IIIIIIII)el. of treeS How- what analogou@ to inc,,o@urin, di@tance, with ever, 12-in.0Abli tre(- have fol,11, tjiije@ th(@ 13A of 6-in.-(11111 8Aen)@@, a-')() this value (0.785 @ fti froin column 5. multiplied by 12.74 trc-c@i per principal diffci-ence i@ that the rela@cope su acre, again I I)ro(hicc.@ a BA of 10 @ ft pei - acr(,. The @@aniv "proof" applies and the trali@@it and :@tadia sx-telli is ba@@(.d anglv@ The Spiegel rvla@:Cope coiill)]CX ill 4d to all other trce encolliltered 11-hen .@,Ilnplillff wid) a BAF 10 an"le lzc.@ to ti.@e. Its principal di@advalitagc@@ are that g and lack.,3 the optical ualjtie:@ for good sig-0lit rainy days. INSTRUMENTS FOR POINT SAMPLING 10-9 The wedge prism. A properly grou0w 10-7 The stick-type angle gouge. This @iinple. horizontfil z I I 11-1, 10 @Ila I I Illerely a tapf-red wf.(Jfr(@ Of aja@;; t1lat 1)('11(61 -1 ;@pccir -cc @tenl i:@z Vic oftn ollsist@ Of a NN-0011011 "Oil vvith a 1)0(-)) 1@zllght at 011(' CDd and a - IC r2X.-Ct angle. Whell a ti 170 FOREST MEASUREMENTS POINT-SAM 2qW the bole appears to be displaced, as if see through a camera range 2qz finder. The amount of offset or displacement is controlled by the prism 0 strength, measured in diopters. As one prism dipoter is equal to a right angle displacement of one unit per 100 units of distance, a 3.03-diopter prism will produce a displacement of one unit per 33 units of distance, qIqr i.e., a critical angle of 104.18 min. Other prism-strength relationships 4qW are given in Table 10-1. qLLqJ 8qXq: ... . ....... .2qz 0 Field use of the prism requires that it be held precisely over the W q>_ sampling point at all times, for this point and not the observer's eye qC2qr qCqr 8qW ------ 6q0 is the pivot from which the stand is "swept" by a 360 circle. All tree qCqO 8qW stems not completely offset when viewed through the wedge are counted; others are not tallied (Fig. 10-3). Trees that appear to be borderline should be measured and checked with the appropriate plot radius factor before arbitrarily deciding to tally every other borderline stem. The Prism may be held at any convenient distance from the eye, 6qFz provided it is always positioned directly over the sampling point. Proper orientation also requires that the prism be held in a vertical position and at right angles to the line of sight; otherwise, large errors in the tree tally may result (Fig. 10-4). The wedge prism is simple, relatively inexpensive, portable, and as accurate as other angle gauges when properly calibrated and used. Some q@qj sighting difficulties are found in dense stands where displaced bole sec- 7 tions offset into one another, and special corrections must be applied when slopes of 15 per cent and greater are encountered. However, the latter disadvantage may be cited for all point-sampling devices except the Spiegel relascope. CL E 10-10 Calibration of prisms or angle gauges. Precision-tested prisms and angle gauges should be used whenever feasible, because a BAF of 0 exactly 5, 10. or 40 is conducive to faster computations than such values as 4.9, 9.8, or 39.5 (See. 10-3). Prisms ground to within +1 r: min of a specified angle are desired, for such deviation will usually result in a maximum error of about 2 per cent for a BAF 10 prism. q_qj Where inexpensive prisms or angle gauges are employed and the exact 2q< BAF is unknown, such devices should be carefully calibrated. As indi- . . ...... qF- vidual eyesights may vary appreciably, it may even be desirable to calibrate all instruments (regardless of price or supposed precision) for 0 each cruiser's own sighting habits or peculiarities. To calibrate a prism or angle gauge, a target of known width (for 2qz example 1.0 ft is set up against a contrasting background. With the angle gauge or prism in proper orientation, the observer backs away I6qE_q7 from the target until the target exactly fills the sighting angle (or until the prism image is displaced as shown for the "borderline" tree in Fig. 0 7 -7 - 172 FOREST MEASUREMENTS POINT-SAMPLE TIMBER CRUISING 173 critical angles, however, this The exact distance from target to instrument is then measured I I 10-31. The of tile near eq and the BAF computed by this relationship: functions for narrow angles. For reliable reults he mounted on a plane table, tripod, or vise BAF = 10,8890 Of the horizontal distance to tile target is tile target width Ill feet, is tile distance to target rived, conversions similar to those in Table where It to simplify subsequent Inventory computation in feet. at target is used in calibra- The foregoing formula, is not exact when a flat 10-11 Corrections for slope. Unless the Spiegel target is a circular cross section with dial but only when the establish subsequent angles, Corrections must be made in point sampling When slope is 15 per cent or greater, that elevation per 100 horizontal feet (Stage, 1959) When the wedge prism is used, an appro pensation for slope can he made by tilting through. the estimated slope angle- at right PRISM HELD CORRECTLY TABLE 10-3 Slope Correction Table for Point Sampling* Maximum per cent Maximum ln degrees, Multiply of slope at of slope at count by sampling point sampling, point 15 6.75 1.01 20 9.00 1.02 25 11.25 1.03 30 13.50 1.04 PRISM TILTED OR DIPPED 35 15.75 1.06 40 18.00 1.08 45 20.25 1.10 50 2 2.50 1.12 55 24.75 1.14 60 27.00 1.17 65 29 .25 1.19 70 31.50 1.22 75 33.75 1. 25 36.00 1.28 85 38. 25 1.31 PRISM TIPPED IN VERTICAL 90 40.50 1.34 PLANE 95 42.75 1.38 100 45.00 1.41 This correction for tree count. BA, and volume per acre is true only when it is assumed that in this sampling procedure a proportionate number of trees will be added when the slope distance is corrected to the true horizontal distance. For all FIG. 10-4 Correct and incorrect methods of holding the practical purposes, however, tree count, BA, and volume can adapted from hovind be corrected by using the above mulitpliers. wedge prism. SOURCE: Hovind and Ricek, 1961. ricek, 1961. A -oil AM: 00 M M With angle. gauges such as the stick type, the unadjusted field tally sampling process, it is helpful to compile tables of limiting distances can be corrected by (1) measuring the slope at right angles to the contour in advance of fieldwork. These are easily prepared by multiplying vari- in per cent or degrees and (2) applying corresponding correction factors ous tree diameters by the appropriate plot radius factor (Table 10-4). to BA or volume per acre estimates from Table 10-3. The amount of For maximum utility, such tables should be expressed in feet and links. slope is usually measured with an Abney level. When brush or other obstructions make it necessary to move from 10-12 Doubtful frees, limiting distances, and bias. Most cruisers pos- the sampling point to view certain stems, special care must be exercised ain- sess some degree of observer bias wben "sighting in" doubtful trees. In a to maintain the correct distances from obscured trees. Failure to in * strict sense, borderline trees occur only when the distance from the sam- tain proper distance relationships can result in sizable errors in the pling point to the stem center is precisely equal to tree dbh times plot tally, especially when using a large BAR radius factor. Therefore, if doubtful trees are regularly checked by care- 10-13 Choice of instruments. In summary, the selection of a point ful measurement, the borderline tree is rarely encountered. sampling sighting gauge is largely a matter of balancing such factors To encourage r .egular field checks.of doubtful trees and speed up'the as costs, efficiency, and personal preferences. All the devices described here will provide a reliable tree tally if they are properly calibrated TABLE 10-4 Horizontal Limiting Distances in Feet for BAF 10 Point-sampling Instruments and carefully used. Accordingly, the following generalizations will be primarily useful to the newer advocates of point sampling: Dbby in. 0.0 0.1 1 0.2 1 0.3 1 0.4 1 0.5 1 0.6 1 0.7 0-8 1 0.9 1 When steep slopes are regularly encountered, the Spiegel relascope is preferred. - I 1 2 For relatively flat topography, either the wedge prism or the stick gauge may 5 13.75 14.02 14.30 14.57 14.85 15.12 15.40 i5.67 15.95 16-22 be used. The prism is particularly desirable for persons who wear eyeglasses, 6 16.50 16.77 17.05 17.32 17.60 17.87 18.15 18.42 18.70 18-97 because the vertex of the sighting angle occurs at the prism rather than at the observer's eve. However, the prism is difficult to use in dense stands 7 19.25 19.52 19.80 20.07 20.35 20.62 20.90 21.17 21.45 21.72 8 22.00 22.27 22.55 22.82 23.10 23.37 23.65 23.92 24.20 24.47 due to displacement of stem sections into one another. 9 24.75 25.02 25.300 25.57 25.85 26.12 26.40 26.67 26.95 27.22 3 The simple stick gauge, though largely supplanted by the prism, is preferable 10 27.50 27.77 28.05 28.32 28.60 28.87 29.15 29.42 29.70 29.97 in dense stands---especially if the cruiser does not wear spectacles. Cruisers who use point sampling only occasionally will find the stick gauge more 11 30.25 30.52 30.80 31@07 31.35 31.62 31.90 32.17 32-45 32.72 reliable, because there are fewer ways for errors to result with this device 12 33.00 33.27 33.55 33.82 34.10 34.37 34.65 34.92 35.20 35-47 than with the wedge prism. 13 35.75 36.02 36.30 36.57 36.85 37.12 37.40 37.67 37.95 38.22 14 38,50 38.77 39-05 39.32 39.60 39.87 40.15 40.42 40.70 40-97 VOLUME CONVERSIONS 15 41'.25 41.52 41.80 42.07 42.35 42.62 42.90 43.17 43.65 43.72 10-14 Tree countand basal area. As previously described, each tree 16 44.00 44.27 44.55 44.82 45.10 45.37 45.65 45@92 46.20 46.47 tallied in point sampling, regardless of its diameter, represents the same 17 46.75 47.02 47.30 47.57 47.85 48,12 48.40 48-67 48.95 49.22 IS 49.50 49.77 50.05 50.32 50.60 50.87 51.15 51.42 51.70 51.97 amount of BA on a per acre basis. BA per acre for any tract may 19 52.25 52.52 52.80 53.07 53.35 53.62 53.90 54.17 54.45 54-72 thus be computed by this relationship: 20 55.00 55.27 55.55 55,82 56.10 56.37 56.65 56.92 57.20 57.47 BA per acre = total trees tallied X BAF 21 57.75 58.02 58.30 58.57 58.85 59.12 59.40 59.67 59.95 60.22 no. of -points 22 60.50 60.77 61105 61.32 61.60 61.87 62.15 62.42 62.70 62.97 23 63.25 63.52 63.80 64.07 64.35 64.62 64.90 65-17 6.5.45 65.72 If the BAF is 10 and 160 trees are tallied at 20 sample points, the 24 66.00 M27 66.55 66.82 67.10 67.37 67-6.5 67.92 6S.20 GS.47 BA per acre would be 160/20 X 10 = 80 sq ft per acre. As with all 25 68.75 69.02 69.30 69.57 69.85 70.12 70.40 70.67 70.95 71.22 cruising techniques, it is presumed that the counted trees are representa- 26 71.50 71i@7 72-05 72.32 72. 60 72.87 73-15 73.42 73.70 73.97 tive of the population sampled. 27 74.25 74.52 74.80 75.07 75.35 7.5.62 75-90 76.17 76.45 76.72 10-15 Derivation of tree volumes. IMost cruisers are . i.nterested in vol- 28 77.00 77.27 77.55 77.82 78.10 78.37 78.65 78.92 79.20 79. 47 29 79.75 80.02 80.30 SO.57 80.85 81.12 81.40 81.67 8 1. 95 82-22 unies expressed in board feet, cubic feet,'or cords rather than BA alone. 30 82.50 82.77 83. 05 83.32 s3.60 83.87 84.15 84.42 84.70 84.97 When using point sampling, volume computations are handled differently POINT-SAMPLE TIMBER CRUISING 177 176 FOREST MEASUREMENTS from conventional cruising, because all sizes of trees have the same To review thr forgoing computations, the height classes desired for field tallying are listed first in column 1. The average dbh that corre- BA per acre. The variable of dbh (a function of BA) can therefore be ignored when only total volumes are required, and the field tally sponds to each height class must be obtained from existing records or can be reduced to a simple stem county by height classes. Average stand special field samples (column 2). With these two values known, the volumn per acre is determined by using ratios of the volumes of each volume per tree (column 3) is read from any desired tree volumne table. height class to their respective BA. The ratios or volume factors can Number of trees per acre (column 4), based on the appropriate dbh be quickly determined by use of the "per acre conversion factors" in class, may be read directly from Table 10-2 for BAF 10 conversions--or Table 10-2 and the volume of one tree of a specified size. Volume per computed as described in Sec. 10-6. Finally, the volume per acre conver- acre can thus be derived by this relationship: sion (column 5) is simply a product of volume per tree and number Volume per acre= volumn per tree)(no trees per acre) of trees per acre. no. of sample points 10-16 Field tally by height classes. The reason that point sampling To illustrate the computation of volume per acre conversions, it may appears to be such a simple method of deriving standing tree volumes be assumed that cordwood factors are desired for 1-bolt (8 ft of mer- is that most of the computational work is accomplished in advance of chantable height) trees in the Lake states by five tree diameter classes. the field tally. When the volumn per acre conversions are incorporated directly into the field tally form and trees are recorded by height classes Essential steps in deriving these converting factors can be illustrated only, a minimum of post-cruising calculations are necessary. Under these in tabular form: conditions, the field record essentially becomes a cumulative tally sheet and volumes call be speedily summarized (Table Trees Per acre Volume Per Merchantable height, Corresponding Volume per (Table 10-2), acre, dbh class, in. tree, cd (column 3 x 4) X 4) ft no. of stems TABLE 10-5 Simplified Field Tally and Volume Summary Fc Point Sampling 8 6 0.017 51.02 0.87 8 8 0.031 28.65 0.80 8 10 0.049 18.35 0.90 Tract: La Crosse, Wisconsin Timbered area: 40 acres 8 12 0.070 12.74 0.89 No. of points: 20 BAF: 10 8 14 0.095 9.35 0.89 Height class, Tree tally, Volume per acre, Ta no. of stems ed For the single 8-ft-height class listed, it will be noted that volume per acre conversions show very little change from one dbh class to an- S 20 0.9 other. Hence, unless stand table are required, it is superflous to break 16 :10 1.5 down the tally by diameter classes. As shown here, a volume factor -24 40 2.0 of 0.9 cd will suffice for a11 8-ft heights, irrespective of diameter changes. alhes 32 20 2.5 1,q11 be C.0111pute'ql 40 10 3. t) For other height classes, volume per acre factors might be computed 4S 5 q3. as follows: Totals 125 Trees Trees per acre Volume per 125 trees Merchantable BA per nere. q- X 11) 62.5 srj ft per acre Corresponding Volume pr (Table 10-2), acre, 20 points height, dbh class, in. tree, cd (column 3 x 4) no. of stems 240.5 ed ft Average volunme per acre 12.0-95 ed Per a 20 points 2,S . 6 -5 S9 8 15 16 11) 0. Its: I S: 52 24 12 0 155 12, 74 1 it 32 );5 2.52 2.5 When stand and stock tables are needed and 14 0. 269 3 qbv qdiallieter special cunuqfqlative tally qsh 40 1S 0-5:; 1 5. 66 71 35 4 22 01pS Thornton and lqlutcllion. 1958t. 7 FOREST MEASUREMENTS 2qOINT8qqLE 4q= 8qM 8qM 4qM POINT-SAMPLE CRUISING INTENSITY and Stover, 1957). In this test, BAF 10 point samples were measured from the centers of 655 circular 1/4-acre plots that were distributed 1017 Comparisons with conventional plots. There is no fixed plot size throughout 12 counties. Volume per acre comparisons were made for when using point sampling; hence it is difficult, to compute cruise inten- BA, cubic-foot volumes, and board-foot volumes. sity on a conventional area-basis. Each tree has its own imagi- Differences in mean volumes by the two sampling methods were not nary plot radius (depending on the BAF used), and the exact plot size significant at the 5 per cent level. Coefficients of variation for point cannot be easily determined, even after the tally has been made. How- sampling were only 7 to 12 per cent larger than for the 1/4-acre plots, ever, approximations can be made on the basis of the average stem and standard errors were within 0.5 per cent of each other. It was esti- diameter encountered at a given point. mated that 20 per cent more point samples would be needed to provide the same accuracy in cubic volume as derived from the plots; however, even with these additional samples the points could be measured in Assuming an even-aged plantation with a single dbh class and a critical angle of 104.18 min, the area sampled would have a radius considerably less field time. of 6 X 2.75 or 16.5 ft-equivalent to about 1/50 acre. If the dbh class were doubled to 12 in., the effective sample area would quadruple to 10-20 Attributes and limitations. In summary, the principal advantages about 1/12 acre. To sample a full 1/5 acre, average dbh would have to be about 19 in. of point sampling over plot cruising are: From the foregoing, it follows that use of BAF 10 sample points in 1 It is not necessary to establish a fixed plot boundary; thus greater cruising lieu of the same number of 1/5- or 1/4-acre plots will usually result speed is possible. in a tally of fewer trees. From a statistical standpoint, however, the 2 Large, high-value trees are sampled in greater proportions than smaller stems. selection of trees according to size rather than frequency may more 3 BA and volume per acre may he derived without direct measurement of stem diameters. 4 When volume per acre conversions are developed in advance of fieldwork, than offset this reduction of sample size--and with an additional saving efficient volume determinations can be made in a minimum of time. Thus in time. Conversely, it must be remembered that smaller samples of the medhod is particularly suited to quick, reconnaissance-type cruises. any kind require larger expansion or blow-up factors. Thus when point sampling is adopted, the so-called borderline trees must always be closely checked, for the erroneous addition omission of a single stem reduces The main drawbacks to point sampling are: the accuracy of any volume estimate by the amount of the BAF. 1 Heavy underbrush reduces sighting visibility and cruising efficiency. 10-18 Number of sampling points needed. The only accurate method 2 Because of the relatively small size of sampling units, carelessness and errors of determining how many point samples should be measured is to deter- in the tally (when expanded to tract totals)are likely to be more serious mine the standard deviation (or coefficient of variation) of BA or volume than in plot cruising. 3 Slope compensation causes difficulties that may result in largo errors unless per acre from a preliminary field sample. When this has been done, special care is exercised. Similar difficulties are encountered in strip and line- plot cruising of course. sampling intensity may be derived from Table 8-1 or by formulas de- scribed in Secs 8-15 and 8-16. If the statistical approach is not feasible, 4 Some problems arise in edge-effect bias when sampling very small tracts the following rules of thumb will often provide acceptable results: or long narrow tracts. 1 If the BAF is selected according to tree size so that an average of 5 to 12 trees are counted at each point, use the same number of points as 1/5-acre plots. 2 With a BAF 10 angle gauge and timber that averages 12 to 15 in. in diameter, use the same number of points as 1/10-acre plots. 3 For reliable estimates, never use fewer than 20 points in natural timber stands or less than 10 points in even-aged plantations. 10-19 Point samples versus plots. Of the numerous field comparisons of point sampling and plot curising, one of the more extensive evaluations was made by the U.S. Forest Survey in Southeast Texas (Grosenbaugh POINT-SAMPLE TIMBER CRUISING 181 180 FOREST MEASUREMENTS AA 0 WOODY PLANTS .20 Abies balsamea. Balsam fir. 23 Aesculus spp. Aesculus. 24 Aesculus Hippocastanum. Hor .sechestnut. 25 Aesculus octandra. Sweet Buckeye. 28 Acer spp. Maple. 29 Acer negundo. Box Elder. 30 Acer nigrum. Black maple. 31 Acer pensylvanicum. Striped maple. 32 Acer platanoides. Norway maple. 33 Acer rubrum. Red maple. 34 Acer saccharinum. Silver maple. 35 Acer saccharum. Sugar maple. 36 Acer spicatum. Mountain maple (Mtn. maple). 39 Ailanthus altissima. Ailanthus, Tree of heaven. 42 Akebia quinata. Akebia. 45 Albizzia julibrissin. Mimosa. 48 Alnus spp. Alder. 49 Alnus maritima. Seaside alder. 50 Alnus rugosa. Speckled alder. 51 Alnus serrulata. Smooth alder. 52 Althaea'officinalis. Marshmallow. 54 Amelanchier spp. Service Berry. 55 Amelanchier arborea. Common Service Berry (Com. svcberry). 56 Amelanchier canadensis. Canadian Service Berry (Can. svcberry). 57 Amelanchier humilis. Low Service Berry (Lo. svcberry). 58 Amelanchier intemedia spach. Intermediate Service Berry (Int. sv.cberry). 59 Amelanchier laevis. Smooth Service Berry (Smith svcberry). 60 Amelanchier obovalis. Obovate Service Berry (Obvt. svcb6rry). 61 Amelanchier sanguinea. Roundleaf Service Berry (Rd. lf. svcberry). 62 Amelanchier stolonifera. Stoloniferous Service Berry (Stol. svcberry). 65 Amoroha fruticosa. Falso indigo. 68 Ampelopsis arborea. Pepper-vine. 69 Aralia sp. L. Aralia. 71 Aralia spinosa. Hercules Club. 74 Aristolochia durior. Pipe-vine. 77 Arundinaria gigantea. Brake cane. 80 Ascyrum spp. Ascyrum. 81 Ascyrum stans. St. Peter's wort. (St. Pete wort). 82 Ascyrum hypericoides. St. Andrew's Cross. (St. Andy Cross). 85 Asimina t:,iloba. Pawpaw. 88 Baccharis halimifolia. High-tide bush. 91 Berberis spp. Barberry. 92 Berberis canadensis. American Barberry (Amer. Barberry). 93 Berberis thunbergii. Japanese Barberry (Jap. Barberry). 94 Berberis vulgaris. Common Barberry (Com. Barberry). 95 Berchemia scandens. Rattan-vine. 97 Betula spp. Birch. 98 Betula alba. European white birch (Eur. white birch). 99 Betula lenta. Black birch. 100 Betula lutea. Yellow birch. -97- Woody Plants cont. 101 Betu la nigra. River birch. 104 Bignonia capreolata. Crossvine. 107 Broussonetia papyrifera. Paper Mulberry. 110 Callicarpa americana. Beauty berry. 113 Calycanthus floridus. Carolina allspice (Carol. allspice). 116 Campsis radicans. Trumpet creeper (Trumpt. creepr.). 119 Carpinus caroliniana. American hornbeam (Amer. hornbeam). i22 Carya spp. Hickory. 123 Carya cordiformis. Swamp hickory. 124 Carya glabra. Pignut. 125 Carya ovalis. Sweet pignut. 126 Carya ovata. Shagbark Hickory (Shagbark). 127 Carya pallida. Pale hickory. 128 Carya tomentosa. Mockernut. 131 Castanea spp. Castanea. 132 Castanea dentata. American Chestnut (Amer. Chestnut). 133 Castanea pumila. Chinquapin. 136 Catalpa spp. Catalpa. 137 Catalpa bignonioides. Southern catalpa (S. Catalpa) . 1138 Catalpa ovata. Chinese Catalpa (Chinese Cat.). 139 Catalpa speciosa. Northern Catalpa (N. Catalpa). i42 Ceanothus americanus. New Jersey Tea (Jersey Tea). 145 Celtis spp. Celtis. 1146 Celtis occidentalis. Hackberry. 147 Celtis tenuifolia. Dwarf Hackberry (Dwf. Hackberry). f,50 Cephalanthus occidentalis. Buttonbush. .1 53 Celastrus scandens. Bittersweet. 56 Cercis canadensis. Redbud. 159 Chamaecyparis thyoides. Southern White Cedar (S. White Cedar). f60 Chamaedaphne calyculata. Leatherleaf. 462 Chimaphila spp. Chimaphila. 1.63 Chimaphila maculata. Spotted Wintergreen (Spot wintergrn.). 164 Chimaphila umbellata. Pipsissewa. 167 Chionanthus virginicus. Fringe-tree. 170 Clematis spp. Clematis. 171 Clematis dioscoreifolia. Clematis. 172 Clematis verticillaris. Mountain clematis (Mtn. clematis). i73 Clematis Viorna. Leather flower. 1!74 Clematis virginiana. Virgin's bower. 1@77 Clethra alnifolia. Sweet Pepperbush (Swt. Pepperbush). 180 Comptonia peregrina. Sweet fern. 183 Cornus alternifolia. Green Osier. i84 Cornus spp. Dogwood. 1;85 Cornus Amomum. Red Willow. 1186 Cornus canadensis. Bunchberry. 1.87 C,ornus florida. Flowering dogwood (Flr. dogwood). 1188 Cornus obliqua. Silky dogwood. f89 Cornus racemosa. Gray-stem dogwood (Gry.-stem dogwd.). 1;90 Cornus stolonifera. Red Osier. 191 Cornus rugosa. Roundleaf dogwood. (Rndleg. dogwood). 193 Corylus spp. Hazel. 04 Corylus americana. American hazelnut (Amer. hazelnut). 195 Corylus cornuta. Beaked hazelnut (Beak. hazelnut). 08 Crataegus spp. Hawthorn. Woody Plants - cont 199 Crataegus basilica. Hawthorn #1. 200 Crataegus biltmoreana. Biltmore Hawthorn (Biltmore Hthn.). 201 Crataegus Calpodendron. Pear Hawthorn. 202 Crataegus Canbyi. Canby's Hawthorn (Canby's Hthn.). 203 Crataegus crus-galli. Cockspur-Thorn. 204 Crataegus Dodgei. Dodge Hawthorn (Dodge Hthn.). 205 Crataegus intricata. Hawthorn #2. 206 Crataegus macrosperma. Variable Hawthorn (Var. Hawthorn). 207 Crataegus Margaretta. Margaret Hawthorn (Margaret Hthn.). 208 Crataegus mercerensis. Hawthorn #3. 209 Crataegus pedicellata. Scarlet Hawthorn (Scarlet Hthn.). 210 Crataegus pensylvanica. Hawthorn #4. 211 Crataegus Phaenopyrum. Washington Hawthorn (Wash. Hawthorn). 212 Crataegus populnea. Hawthorn #5. 213 Crataegus pruinosa. Wax-fruit Hawthorn (Wax-fruit Hthn.). 214 Crataegus punctata. Dotted Hawthorn (Dotted Hthn.). 215 Crataegus rugosa. Hawthorn #6. 216 Crataegus sicca. Hawthorn V. 217 Crataegus stolonifera. Hawthorn #8. 218 Crataegus uniflora. Dwarf Hawthorn (Dwf. Hawthorn). 219 Crataegus viridis. Southern Thorn (S. Thorn). 222 Cytisus scoparius. Scotch Broom. 224 Decodon verticillatus. Swamp loosestrife. 225 Diervilla Lonicera. Bush Honeysuckle (Bsh. Honeysuckle). 228 Diospyros virginiana. Common Persimmon (Com. Persimmon). 231 Dirca Palustris. Leatherwood. 234 Elaeagnus angustifolia. Russian olive. 237 Epigaea repens. Ground laurel. 240 Euonymus spp. Euonymus. 241 Euonymus alatus. Winged Euonymus (Wing. Euonymus). 242 Euonymus americanus. Strawberry Bush. 243, Euonymus atropurpureus. Burning Bush. 246 Fagus grandifolia. American Beech. 247 Fagus sylvatica. European Beech. 249 Forsythia spp. Forsythia. 250 Forsythia suspensa. Forsythia. 251 Forsythia viridissima. Forsythia.. 254 Fraxinus spp. Ash. 255 Fraxinus americana. White Ash. 256 Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Green Ash. 257 Fraxinus nigra. Black Ash. Gaultheria procumbens. Wintergreen. 263 Gaylussacia spp. Huckleberry. 264 Geylussacia baccata. Black huckleberry (Blk. hucklebry.). 265 Gaylussacia brachycera. Juniper Berry. 266 Gaylussacia dumosa. Dwarf huckleberry (Dwf. Hucklebry.). 267 Gaylussacia frondosa. Dangleberry. 270 Gleditsia triacanthos. Honey Locust. 273 Gymnocladus dioica. Kentucky Coffeetree (Ky. Coffeetree). 276 Hamamelis virginiana. Witch-hazel. 279 Hedera Helix. English Ivy. _99- Woody Plants - cont. 2@81 Hibiscus spp. Mallow. @82 Hibiscus syriacus. Rose-of-Sharon. 2'85 Hudsonia tomentosa. Beach heath. 2'88 Hydrangea arborescens. Wild hydrangea. 291 Hypericum spp. St. John's-wort. 2@92 Hypericum densifolorum. St. John's-wort. (St. John-wort). Z93 Hypericum spathulatum. St. John's-wort. (St. John-wort). 2'95 Ilex coreacea. Large Gallberry (Large Balberry). 2'96 Ilex spp. Holly. 2@97 Ilex decidua. Possum Haw. 198 Ilex glabra. Inkberry. 299 Ilex laevigata. Winterberry. A,00 Ilex montana. Mountain holly (Mtn. Holly). 301 Ilex opaca. American Holly (Amer. Holly). 5,02- Ilex verticillata. Black Alder. 305 Itea virginica. Tassel-white. 308 Iva frutescens. Low-tide bush. ill Juglans spp. Juglans. J12 Juglans cinerea. Butternut. 313 Juglans nigra. Black walnut. 316 Juniperus communis. Common juniper. 117 Juniperus virginiana. Red cedar. J20 Kalmia spp. Laurel. 3121 Kalmia angustifolia. Sheep-laurel. j22 Kalmia latifolia. Mountain laurel. (Mtn. laurel). 325 Koelreuteria paniculata. Goldenrain-Tree (Goldenrn.-Tree). 326 Kosteletzkya virginica. Seashore-mallow. @28 Larix laricina. American larch. 531 Leucothoe racemosa. Fetterbush. j34 Ligustrum spp. Privet. j35 Ligustrum obtusifolium. Privet. j36 Ligustrum ovalifolium. California Privet (Cal. Privet). @37 Ligustrum vulgare. Common privet. 1.40 Lindera Benzoin. Blume Spicebush. (Blume Spicebsh.). 343 Linnaea borealis. Twinflower. 346 Liquidambar styraciflua. Sweet gum. J49 Liriodendron tulipifera. Tulip tree. j52 Lonicera spp. Honeysuckle. J53 Lonicera canadensis. Fly-honeysuckle (Fly-honeysukl.). j54 Lonicera dioica. Mountain honeysuckle (Mtn. honysukl.). j55 Lonicera japonica. Japanese honeysuckle (Jap. honeysukl.). j56 Lonicera Morrowi. Honeysuckle #1. 557 Lonicera sempervirens. Trumpet honeysuckle (Trump. hnysukl.). @58 Lonicera tatarica. Tartarian honeysuckle (Tarta. hnysukl.). @61 Lycium halimifolium. Matrimony vine. @64 Lyonia spp. Lyonia. 3 65 Lyonia ligustrina. Male-berry. 566 Lyonia mariana. Stagger bush. 369 Maclura pomifera. Osage orange. 172 Magnolia spp. Magnolia. _100- Woody Plants - cont. 373 Magnolia acuminata. Cucumber tree. 374 Magnolia tripetala. Umbrella Magnolia (Umbrella Mag.). 375 Magnolia virginiana. Sweet Bay. 378 Menisperu 'm canadense. Canadian Moonseed (Can. Moonseed), 381 Menziesia pilosa. Minnie-bush. 384 Mitchella repens. Partridge berry (Partridge bry.). 387 Morus spp. Mulberry. 388 Morus alba. White Mulberry. 389 Morus rubra. Red Mulberry. 392 Myrica spp. Myrica. 393 Myrica cerifera. Wax-myrtle. 394 Myrica pensylvanica. Bayberry. 397 Nemopanthus mucronata. Catberry, Mountain.Holly. 400 Nyssa sylvatica. Black gum. 401 Opuntia humifusa. Prickly pear. 403 Ostrya virginiana. Hop Hornbeam. 406 Oxydendrum arboreum. Sorrel Tree. 409 Parthenocissus quinquefolia. Virginia Creeper (Va. Creeper). 412 Paulownia tomentosa. Empress tree. 415 Persea Borbonia. Red Bay. 418 Philadelphus spp. Mock Orange. 419 Philadelphus coronarius. Garden Mock-orange (Gdn. Mock-orng.). 420 Philadelphus hirsutus. Hairy Mock-orange (Hry. Mock-orng.). 421 Philadelphus inodo Irus. Common Mock-orange (Com. Mock-orng.). 422 Philadelphus pubescens. Gray Mock-orange (Gry. Mock-orng.). 425 Phoradendron flavescens. Mistletoe. 428 Physocarpus opulifolius. Ninebark. 431 Picea spp. Spruce. 432 Picea Abies. Norway Spruce. 433 Picea glauca. White Spruce. 434 Picea pungens. Blue Spruce. 435 Picea rubens.. Red Spruce. 438 Pinus spp. Pine. 439 Pinus echinata. Yellow Pine. 440 Pinus resinosa. Red Pine. 441. Pinus rigida. Pitch Pine. 442 Pinus serotina. Marsh Pine, Pond Pine. 443 Pinus strobus. White Pine. 444 Pinus sylvestris. Scotch Pine. 445 Pinus taeda. Loblolly Pine. 446 Pinus virginidna. Virginia Pine. 447 Pinus nigra. Austrian Pine. 449 Platanus occidentalis. Sycamore. 452 Populus spp. Populus. 453 Populus alba. White poplar. 454 Populus canescens. Gray poplar. 455 Populus deltoides. Eastern cottonwood (E. cottonwood). 456 Populus gile.adensis. Balm of Gilead (Gilead Balm). 457 Populus grAndidentata. Large-toothed aspen (1g. tooth aspen).. 458 Populus heterophylla. Downy poplar. /@459 Populus nigra. Black poplar. 460 Populus tremuloides. Trembling aspen. 461 Potentilla spp. Cinquefoil. _101- Woody Plants cont. 463 Prunus spp' P'runus. 4@4 runus all;ghaniensis. Allegheny Plum (Allgny. Plum). 465 Prunus americana. American Wild Plum (A. Wild Plum). 466 Prunus.angustifolia. Chickasaw Plum. 467 Prunus'avium. Bird Cherry. 468 Prunus Cerasus. Sour Cherry. 469 Prunus Mahaleb. Mahaleb Cherry. 470 Prunus maritima. Beach Plum. 471 Prunus pensylvanica. Pin Cherry. 472 Prunus Persica. Peach. 473 Prunus.,serotina. Black Cherry. 474 Prunus virginiana. Choke Cherry. 07 Ptelea trifoliata. Water-ash. 480 Pyrus spp. Pyrus. 481 Pyrus americana. American mountain ash (Am. mtn. ash). ,48L Pyrus angustifolia Ait. Wild crab. '480 Pyrus arbutifolia.. Red chokeberry. 484 Pyrus communis. Common pear. 485 Pyrus coronaria. Wild crab. -486_ Pyrus floribunda. Purple chokeberry (Pur. chokeberry). 487 Pyrus.Malus. Apple. 488 Pyrus, melanocarpa. Black chokeberry (Blk. chokeberry). 49!1`@ Quercus spp. Oak. 4�2' Quercu"S alba. White oak. 4�3 Quercus bicolar. Swamp white oak. 4@4 Quercus coccinea. Scarlet oak. 495 Quercus falcata. Southern red oak (S. red oak). 406 Quercus ilicifolia. Scrub oak. 497 Quercus imbricaria. Shingle oak. 408 Quercus lyrata. Swamp post oak. 499 Quercus macrocarpa. Bur oak. 500 Quercus marilandica. Black Jack oak. 561 Quercus Michauxii. Basket oak, Swamp Chestnut Oak. 562 Quercus Muehlenbergii. Yellow oak. 503 Quercus nigra. Water oak. 564 Quercus palustris. Pin Oak. 505 Quercus Phellos. Willow oak. 566 Quercus prinoides. Chinquapin oak. 507 Quercus Prinus. Chestnut oak, Rock oak. 508 Quercus rubra. Red oak. 509 Quercus Shumardii. Shumard's oak. 5iO Quercus stellata. Post.oak. 5il Quercus velutina. Black oak. 512 Quercus laurifolia. Laurel-leaved oak. 514 Rhamnus spp. Buckthorn.. 5i5 Rhamnus cathartica. Common Buckthorn (Com. Buckthorn). 5i6. Rhamnus f .rangula. European Buckthorn (Eu'r. Buckthorn). 5i, 9 Rhodo ,dendron spp. Rhododendron. -102- Woody Plants - cont. 520 Rhododendron arborescens. Smooth Azalea. 521 Rhododendron atlanticum. Dwarf Azalea. 522 Rhododendron calendulaceum. Flame Azalea. 523 Rhododendron canescens. Sweet Azalea. 524 Rhododendron maximum. Rosebay. 525 Rhododendron nudiflorum. Pink Azalea. 526 Rhododendron roseum.' Mountain Azalea (Mtn. azalea.). 527 Rhododendron viscosum. Swamp Azalea. 529 Rhus spp. Rhus. 530 Rhus aromatica. Fragrant Sumac. 531 Rhus copallina. Shining Sumac. 532 Rhus glabra. Smooth Sumac. 533 Rhus radicans. Poison IVY. 534 Rhus toxicodendron. Poison Oak. 535 Rhus typhina. Staghorn Sumac. 536, Rhus vernix. Poison Sumac. 539 Ribes spp...Ribes. 54o Ribes americanum. Black Currant. 541 Ribes cynosbati. Dogberry. 542 Ribes glandulosum. Skunk Currant. 543 Ribes rotundifolium. Eastern Wild Gooseberry (E gooseberry). .546 Robinia spp. Locust. 547 Robinia hispida. Bristly Locust. 548 Robinia pseudo-acacia. Black Locust. 551 Rosa spp. Rose. 552 Rosa canina. Dog Rose. 553 Ro'sa carolina. Low Pasture Rose (L. Pasture tose). 554 Rosa eglanteria. Sweet Brier. 555 Rosa multiflora. Multiflora Rose (Multif1r. rose). 556 Rosa palustirs. Swamp Rose. 557 Rosa virginiana. Pasture Rose. 56o Rubus spp. Raspberry. 561 Rubus argutus. Tall Blackberry (Tall bkberry). 562 Rubus allegheniensis.' Allegheny Blackberry (Allgny bkberry). 563 Rubus cuneifolius. Sand Blackberry (Sand bkberry). 564 Rubus eusleuii. Southern Dewberry (S. dewberry). 565 Rubus flagellaris. Northern Dewberry (N. dewberry). 566 Rubus hispidus. Swamp Dewberry. 567 Rubus occidentalis. Wild Black Raspberry (Blk. raspberry). 568 Rubus odoratus. Purple-Flowering Raspberry. 569 Rubus ostryifolius. Dewberry. 570 Rubus pensilvanicus. Blackberry #1. 571 Rubus phoenicolasius. Wineberry. 572 Rubus ideas strigosus. Maximum Red Raspberry (Max. red rsberry). 575 Salix spp. Willow. 576 Salix alba. White Willow. 577 Salix babylonica. Weeping Willow. 578 Salix bebbiana. Bebb's Willow. .579 Salix capral. Goat Willow. 580 Salix caroliniana. Ward's Willow. 581 Salix.discolor. Pussy Willow. 582 Salix,,fragilis. Crack Willow. .583 Salix hispida., Bristly Crier. 584 Salix humilis. Upland Willow. -103- Woody Plants - cont. 585 Salix interior. Sandbar willow. 596 Salix lucida. Shining willow. 581 Salix nigra. Black willow. 598 Salix pentandra. Bay-leaf willow (Bay-1f. willow). 589 Salix purpurea. Purple willow. 550 Salix*rigida. Heart-leaf willow (Heart-1f. willow). 5j1 Salix sericea. Silky willow. 594 Sambucus spp. Elder. 595 Sambucus canadensis. Common elder. 556 Sambucus pubens. Red-berry Elder (Red-bry. Elder). 5�9 Sassafras albidum. White Sassafras (Wt. Sassafras). 602 Smilax spp. Smilax. 603 Smilax Bona-nox. Bullbrier. 604 Smilax glauca. Sawbrier. 605 Smilax laurifolia. Laurel-leaf brier (Laurl.-lf. brier). 666 Smilax rotundifoli.a. Common greenbrier (Com. greenbrier). 607 Smilax walterei. Redberried Greenbrier. 668 Solanum spp. Nightshade. 669, Solanum Dulcamara. Bittersweet. 612' Spiraea spp. Spiraea. 613 Spiraea alba. Narrow-leaved Meadow Sweet (Nr.-lv. Md.-Sweet). 614 Spiraea corymbosa. Corymed Spiraea. 615 Spiraea japonica. Japanese spiraea (Jap. spiraea). 616 Spiraea latifolia. American Meadow Sweet (Am. Md.-Sweet). 6b Spiraea tomentosa. Steeple-bush. 620 Staphylea trifolia. American bladdernut (A. bladdernut). 6il Styrax grandifolia. Storax. 6@3 Symphoricarpos spp. Symphoricarpos. 624 Symphoricarpos alba. Snowberry. 625 Symphoricarpos orbiculatus. Coralberry. 628 Symplocos tinctoria. Horse-sugar. 631 Syringa spp. Lilac. 632 Syringa Persica. Persian lilac. 633 Syringa vulgaris. Lilac. 63i6 Taxodium distichum. Baldcypress. 639 Thuja occidentalis. N. white cedar. 642 Tilia spp. Basswood. 643 Tilia americana. Basswood. 6 '44 Tilia heterophylla. White Basswood. 6,47 Tsuga canadensis. Hemlock. &@O Ulmus spp. Elm. 6 '@1 Ulmus americana. American elm. 6.52 Ulmus parvifolia. Chinese elm. 6'53 Ulmus procera. English elm. 04 Ulmus pumila. Siberian elm. 6,55 Ulmus rubra. Red elm. 6i58 Vaccinium. spp. Vaccinium. 659 Vaccinium angustifolium. Low sweet blueberry (Lo. swt. blubry.). 66 Vaccinium atrococcum. Black High-bush blueberry (Bk. hi.-bs'h. bbry.). 661 Vaccinium caesariense. Jersey blueberry (Jsy. blubry Y. . I 662 Vaccinium corymbosum. High-bush blueberry (hi.-bsh.-blubry.). 6,63 Vaccinium. macrocarpon. American cranberry (A. cranberry),. -104- Woody Plants - cont. 664 Vaccinium myrtilloides. Canadian Blueberry (Can. Blueberry). 665 Vaccinium Oxycoccos. Small cranberry (Sml. cranberry) 666 Vaccinium stamineum. Deerberry. 667 Vaccinium vacillans. ''Low blueberry. 670 Viburnum spp. Viburnum. 671 Viburnum acerifolium. Maple-leaved viburnum (Maple-lv. vib.). 672 Viburnum alnifolium. Hobblebush. 673 Viburnum cassinoides. Witherod. 674 Viburnum dentatum. Southern Arrow-wood (S. Arrow-woo .d). 675 Viburnum Lentago. Nannyberry. 676 Viburnum nudum. Possum-haw. 677 Viburnum prunifolium. Black-haw. 678 Viburnum Rafinesquianum. Downy Arrow-wood (Downy Arrow-wd.). 679 Viburnum recognitum. Smooth Arrow-wood (Smth. Arrow-wd.). 680 Viburnum rufidulum. Rusty black-haw. 681 Viburnum molle. Soft-leaved Arrow-wood (Sft. Lvd. Arrow-wd.). 682 Vitex Agnus-castus. Chaste tree. 685 Vitis spp. Grape. 686 Vitis aestivalis. Summer grape. 687 Vitis Labrusca. Fox grape. 688 Vitis riparia. Frost grape. 689 Vitis rotundifolia. Muscadine grape (Muscadine grp.). 690 Vitis rupestris. Sugar grape. 691 Vitis vulpina. Winter grape. 694 Wisteria spp. Wisteria. 695 Wisteria floribunda. Wisteria #1. 696 Wisteria frutescens. Wisteria #2. 697 Wisteria sinensis. Sweet Wisteria. Sources: Brown, Russell G. and Melvin L. Brown. 1972. Woody Plants of Maryland. Port City Press, Baltimore. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th ed. American Book Co., New York. -105- HERBACEOUS PLANTS 2000 Acalypha virginica. Three-seeded Mercury. 2003 Achillea millefolium. Common Yarrow. 2006 Acnida cannabina. Water-Hemp. 2009 Acorus calamus. Sweet Flag. 2012 Actinomeris alternifolia. Wingstem. 2013 Adiantum pedatum. Maidenhair Fern. 2015 Aeschynomene spp. Sensitive Joint Vetch. 2018- Agastache nepetoides. Purple Giant Hyssop. 2021 Agrimonia spp. Cocklebur. 2024 Agropyron spp. Couch Grass #1. 2027 Agropyron repens. Couch Grass #2. 2030 Agrostis spp. Agrostis. 2033 Agrostis hyemalis. Rough Hair Grass (Rg Hair Grass). 2036 Alisma spp. Water Plantain #1 (Watr Plantan 1). 2039 Alisma plantago-aquatica. Water Plantain #2 (Watr Plantan 2). 2042 Ailium. spp. Garlic. 2045 Amaranthus spp. Amaranth. 2048 Ambrosia spp. Ragweed. 2051 Amianthium. Muscaetoxicum. Fly-Poison. 2054 Ammophila arenaria. Sand Reed. 2057 Amphicarpa bracteata. Hog-Peanut. 2060 Anagallis arvensis. Scarlet Pimpernel. 2063 Andropogon spp. Beard Grass. 2066 Andropogon geradi. Forked Beard-Grass (Frk Berd Grass). 2069 Andropogon scoparius. Little Blue-Stem (Ltl Blue Stem). 2072 Andropogon ternarius. Silvery Beard-Grass (Slv Berd Grass). 2075 Andropogon virginicus. Broom-Sedge (Va Beard Grass). 2078 Anemone spp. Anemone. 2081 Anemonella thalictroides. Rue-Anemone. 2084 Antennaria spp. Everlasting. 2087 Anthemis spp. Chamomile. 2090 Anthoxanthum. spp. Vernal Grass #1. 2093 Anthoxanthum. odoratum. Vernal Grass #2. 2096 Apios americana. Groundnut. 2099 Aplectrum. hyemale. Putty-Root. 2102 Apocynum spp. Dogbane. 2105 Aquilegia spp. Columbine. 2108 Arabidopsis thabana. Mouse-Ear-Cress. 2111 Arabis spp. Rock-Cress. 2113 Arctium. spp. Burdock. 2115 Arisaema sp. Jack-in-the-Pulpit (Jk-n-th-pl-pit). 2117 Arisaema triphyllum. Jack-in-the-Pulpit (Jck-n-tb-plpit). 2119 Aristida spp. Three-Awn. 2121 Aristida dichtoma. Poverty Grass. 2123 Asclepias spp. Milkweed. 2125 Asparagus officinalis. Asparagus. 2127 Asplenium platyneuron. Ebony Spleenwort (Ebony Splnwort). 2129 Aster spp. Wild Aster. 2131 Athyrium felix-femina. Lady Fern. 2133 Athyrium Thelypteroides. Crested Fern. 2134 Atriplex spp. Orach. 2137 Baptisia spp. False Indigo. 2140 Barbaria spp. Winter-Cress, -107- Herbaceous Plants cont. 2143 Bidens spp. Beggars Tick. 2146 Boehmeria cylindrica. False Nettle. 2149 Botrychium dissectum. Grape Fern. 2152 Botrychium virginianum. Virginia Grape Fern (Va Grape Fern). 2155 Brasenia schreberi. Water-Shield. 2158 Bromus spp. Brome-Grass. 2161 Bulbostylis capillariis. Bulbostylis. 2164 Cahile edentula. Sea-Rocket. 2167 Callitriche spp. Water Starwart. 2170 Calopogon pulchellus. Grass-Pink. 217i Capsella bursa-pastoris. Shepherd's-Purse. 2176 Cardamine spp. Bitter Cress. 2179 Carex' spp. Carex. 2182 Cas.�ia spp. Senna. 2185 Cenchrus tribuloides. Bur-Grass.. 2188 Centaurea spp. Star-Thistle. 2191 Cerastium spp. Mouse-Ear-Chickweed. 2194 Ceratophyllum sop. Coontail. 2197 Chamaelirium spp. Blazing Star #1. 2200 Chamaelirium luteum. Blazing Star #2. 2203 Chelone spp. Turtlehead. 2204 Chelone Iyoni. Red Turtlehead. 2206 Chen6o6ditini.spp. Pigweed. 2209 Chimaphila macdlata. Spotted Wintergreen. (Spottd Wintrgrn). 2212 Chr:ysopgis spp. Golden Aster. 221.5 Cichorium intybus. Chicory. 2216 Cicuta maculata. Water Hemlock. 221� Cinna spp. Wood Reedgrass. 2221 Circaea quadrisulcata. Enchanters Nightshade (Ench Nitshade). 2224 Cirsium spp. Common Thistle. 2227 Cladium mariscoides. Twig Rush. 223b Claytonia spp. Spring-Beauty. 2233 Collinsonia canadensis. Horsd-Balm. 2236 Comandra umbellata. Bastard-Toadflax. 223� Commelina spp. Day Flower. 22412 Convolvulus spp. Bindweed. 224i5 Corallorhiza spp. Coral-Root. 2240 Coreopsis spp. Tickseed. 2251 Croton spp. Croton. 225 '4 Cryptotaenia canadensis. Honewort. 2257 Cuscuta spp. Dodder. 2260 Cynoglossum spp. Wild Comfrey. 2263 Cyperus spp. Cyperus. 2266 Cypripedium spp. Ladies Slipper. 2269 Cypripedium acaule. Moccasin Flower (Mocasin Flwr). 2272 Danthonia spp. Wild Oat-Grass. 227.5 Daucus Carota. Wild Carrot. 2278 Datura spp. Jimson Weed., 228'0 Dennstaedtia punctilobula. Hayscent Fern. 2281 Den*taria spp. Toothwort. 2284 Deschampsia spp. Hairgrass. 228 '7 Desmodium spp. Ticl-trefoil. 229,0 Dianthus spp. Pink. 2293 Digitaria spp. Finger Grass #1. Herbaceous Plants - cont. 2296 Disitaria ischaemum. Small Crab-Grass. 2299 Digitaria sanguinalis.. Finger Grass #2. 2302 Diodia teres. Buttonweed. 2305 Dioscorea spp. Yam. 2309 Distichlis spicata. Marsh Spike Grass (Mrsh Spk Grass). 2411 Draba spp. Draba. 2414 Drosera spp. Sundew. 2417 Dryopteris spp. Wood Fern. 2420 Dryopteris cristata. Crested Wood Fern. 2423 Dryopteris hexagonoptera. Broad Beech Fern. 2426 Dryopteris marginalis. Marginal Shield Fern (Margn Sld Fern). 2429 Dryopteris noveboracensis. New York Fern. 2432 Dryopteris phegoptaris. Long Beech Fern. 2435 Dryopteris spinulosa. Spinulose Wood Fern. 2438 Dryopteris thelypteris. Marsh Fern. 2440 Duchesnea indica. Ind. Strawberry. 2441 Dulichium arundinaceum. Dulichium. 2444 Echinochloa spp. Echinochloa. 2447 Eleocharis spp. Spike Rush. 2450 Elephantopus spp. Elephant's Foot. 2453 Elodea spp. Waterweed. 2456 Elodea canadensis. Waterweed. 2459 Elymus spp..Wild Rye. 2462 Epifagus virginiana. Beechdrops. 2465 Epilobium. spp. Willow Herb, 2468 Equisetum spp. Horsetail. 2471 Equisetum. arvense. Field Horsetail (Field Horsetl). 2474 Equisetum hyemale. Scouring-Rush. 2477 Eragrostis spp. Love Grass. 2480 Erechtites spp. Fireweed. 2483 Erianthus spp. Plume Grass #1. 2486 Erianthus giganteus. Plume Grass #2. 2489 Erigeron spp. Fleabane. 2492 Eriocaulon spp. Pipewort #1. 2495 Eriocaulon septangulare. Pipewort #2. 2498 Eriophorum spp. Cotton-Grass. 2501 Eriophorum virginicum. Virginia Cotton-Grass (Va Coton Grass). 2504 Erythronium. spp. Adder's Tongue. 2507. Eupatorium spp. Joe Pyeweed. 2508 Eupatorium. Perfoliatum. Boneset. 2510 Euphorbia spp. Spurge. 2513 Festuca spp. Fescue. 2516 Fimbristylis spp. Finbristylis. 2519 Fragaria spp. Strawberry. 2522 Frbelichia spp. Cottonweed. 2525 Fuirena spp. Fuirena. 2528 Galium. spp. Bedstraw. 2531 Gentiana spp. Gentian. 2534 Geranium spp. Cranesbill. 2537 Gerardia spp. Gerardia. 2540 Geum spp. Geum. 2541 Glechoma Hederacea. Ground Ivy. 2543 Glyceria spp. Manna Grass. 2546 Gnaphalium spp. Cudweed. _109- Herbaceous Plants cont. 2549 Gonolobus spp. Angle-Pod. 2552 Goodyera pubescens. Rattlesnake Plaintain (Ratlsnk Platn). 2555 Gratiola spp. Hedge-Hyssop. 2558 Habenaria spp. Orchis. 2561 Hackelia.virginiana. Stickseed. 2564 Helianthemum. spp. Frostweed. 2567 Helianthus spp. Sunflower. 2570 Hemerocallis fulva. Day Lily. 2573 Hepatica spp. Liverleaf. 2576 Heteranthera spp. Mud Plantain. 2579 Heteranthera dubia. Water Star Grass (Watr Star Gras). 2582, Hexalectus spicata. Crested Coral-Root. 2585 Hieracium spp. Hawkweed. 2588 Hordeum spp. Barley. 2591 Houstonia spp. Star-Violet. 2594 Hydrocotyle spp. Water-Pennywort. 2597 Hypericum spp. St. John's Wort. 2599@ Hypericum Virginicum. Marsh St. John's-Wort (Marsh St. Jns-Wt.) 2600 Hypoxis hirsuta. Star Grass. 2603 Hystrix patula. Bottle-Brush Grass (Botle-Brsh-Grs). 2606 Impatiens spp. Jewel-Weed. 2609 Ipomoea spp. Morning Glory. 2612. Iris spp. Iris. 2615 Iris versicolor. Large Blue-Flag (Lg."Blue-Flag). 2618 Isoetes saccharata. Quillwort. 2621 Isotria verticillata. Whorled Pogonia. 2624 Juncus spp.,,Bulrush.. 2626 Jussiaea repens.' Primrose Willow. 2627 Lactuca spp. Wild Lettuce. 2630 Lamium spp. Dead-Nettle. 2633 Laportea canadensis. Wood-Nettle,. 2636 Lechea spp. Pinweed. 2642 Lemna minor. Duckweed. 2643 Leontodon autumnalis. Fall Dandelion. 2645 Lepidium spp. Pepperwort.. 2648 Lespedeza spp. Bush Clover. 2651 Liatris spp. Button Snakeroot. 2654 Lilaeopsis chinensis. Lilaeopsis. 2657 Lilium spp. Red Lily. 2660 Lilium. canadense. Wild Yellow Lily (Wld Yelow Lily). 2663 Limonium spp. Sea-Lavender. 2665 Linaria canadensis. Toad-Flax. 2666 Lindernia spp. False Pimpernel. 2669 Linum spp. Flax. 2672 Liparis lilifolia. Large Tway Blade (Lg Tway Blade). 2675 Lobelia cardinalis. Cardinal Flower. 2678 Lolium spp. Lolium. 2681 Ludwigia spp. False-Loosestrife. 2684 Ludwigia palustris. Water-Purslane. 2687 Lugala spp. Woodrush. 2690 Lychnis spp. Campion. 2693 Lycopodium spp. Club-Moss. 2696 Lycopodium complanatum. Crow-Foot. 2699 Lycopodium inundatum. Bog Club-Moss. _110- Herbaceous Plants - cont. 2702 Lycopodium lucidulum..Shining Club Moss. 2705 Lycopodium obscurum. Ground Pine #1. 2708 Lycopodium tristachyum. Ground Pine #2. 2711 Lycopsis spp. Water Horehound. 2714 Lygodium salmatum. Climbing Fern.. 2717 Lysimochia spp. Loosestrife. 2720 Lythrum spp. Loosestrife. 2723 Malaxis unifolia. Green Adders Mouth (Grn Aders Moth). 2736 Malva spp. Mallow. 2739 Medeola virginiana. 'Indian,Cucumber-Root (Idn Cucumbr Rt). 2742 Melampyrum lineare. Cow-Wheat. 2745 Melanthium spp. Bunch Flower #1. 2748 Melanthium lybridum. Crisped Bunch Flower (Crsp Bnch Flwr). 2751 Melanthium virginicum. Bunch Flower #2 (Bunch Flowr #2). 2754 Melilotus spp. Sweet Clover. 2757 Mentha spp. Spearmint. 2760 Mikania Scandens. 2763 Mimulus spp. Monkey-Flower. 27@64 Mimulus ringens. Monkey-Flower. 2766 Mollugo verticillata. Carpetweed. 2769 Monarda spp. Horsemint. 2772 Monotropa spp. Pine Sap. 2775 Monotropsis odorata. Pygmy Pipes. 2778 Ifuhlenbergia spp. Dropseed Grass. 2781 Myosotis spp. Forget-Me-Not. 2784 Myriophyllum spp. Water Mill Foil. 2787. Myriophyllum spicatum. Eurasian Water Milfoil. 2790 Najas spp. Naiad. 2793 Najas flexilis. Pondweed. 2796 Najas gracillima. Thread-like Najas (Thrd-lke-Najas). 2799 Narcissus spp. Narcissus. 2802 Nasturtium officinale. Watercress. 2805 Nuphar spp. Water Lily (W.t Lily). 2808 Nymphaea spp. Fragrant Water Lily (Frgnt Wt Lily). 2811 Obolaria virginica. Pennywort. 2814 Oenothera spp. Evening-Primrose. 2817 Onoclea sensibilis. Sensitive Fern. 2820 Ophioglossum spp. Adders Tongue #1 (Aders Tongue 1). 2823 Ophioglossum vulgatum. Adders Tongue #2 (Aders Tongue 2). 2826 Opuntia humifusa. Prickly Pear. 2829 Orchis spectabilis. Showy Orchis. 2832 Orontium aquaticum. Golden Club. 2835 Osmorhiza spp. Sweet Cicly. 2838 Osmunda cinnamomea. Cinnamon Fern. 284.1 bsmunda claytoniana. Interrupted Fern (Interupt Fern). 2844 Osmunda regalis. Royal Fern. 2847 Oxalis spp, Wood Sorrel. 2850 Panicum spp. Panic Grass. 2853 Panicum agrostoides. Red-Top Panic Grass (Nw-Lv Panic Gs). 2856 Panicum capillare. Witch Grass. 2859 Panicum dichotomum. Narrow Panicum (Nrw Panic). 2862 Panicum microcarpon. Barbed Panic-Grass (Barb Panic Gs). Herbaceous Plants - cont. 2865 Paspalum spp. Paspalum. 2868 Paspalum floridanum. Florida Paspalum (Flord Paspalum). 2871 Paspalum laeve. Field Paspalum. 2874 Passiflora spp. Passion-Flower. 2877 Pellaea spp. Cliff-Brake. 2880 Peltandra, virginica. Arrow-arum. 2883 Penthorum sedoides. Ditch-Stonecrop. 2886 Phalaris spp. Phalaris. 2889 Phalaris arundinacea. Reed Canary Grass (Rd. Cnry G rass). 2892 Phalaris canariensis. Canary Grass. 2895 Phaseolus solystachios. Wild Bean. 2898 Phleum pratense. Timothy. 2899 Phlox maculata. Phlox. 2901 'Phragmites communis@. Reed Grass. 2904 Phryma, leptostachya. Lopseed.; 2907 Physalis spp. Ground-Cherry. 2910 Phytolacca americana. Pokeweed. 2913 Pilea spp. Richweed. 2916 Plantago spp. Plantain. 2919 Pluchea spp. Stinkweed. 2922 Poa spp. Poa. 2925 Podophyllum peltatum. May Apple. 2928 Podostemum ceratophyllum. Threadfoot. 2931 Pogonia spp. Pogonia. 2932 Pogonia ophioglossoides. Beard Flower. 2934 Polygala spp. Milkwort. 2937 Polygonatum biflorum. Solomons Seal. 2940 Polygonum spp. Smartweed. 2943 Polygonum arifolium. Halberd-Leaved Tearthumb. 2945 Polygonum sagittatum. Arrow-Leaved Tearthumb (Arr-Lvd Trthmb). 2946 Polygonum ceandens. False Climbing Buckwheat. 2949 Polymnia uvedalia. Leaf-Cup. 2952 Polypogon monspeliensis. Beard-Grass. 2955 Polystichum acrostichoides. Christmas Fern. 2958 PontederiA cordata. Pickerel-Weed. 2961 Potamogeton spp. Pondweed #1. 2964 Potamogeton crispus. Pondweed #2. 2967 Potamogeton diversifolius. Pondweed #3. 2970 Potamogeton nodosus. Pondweed A. 2973 Potamogeton mysticus. Pondweed #5. 2976 Potamogeton natans. Pondweed #6. 2979 Potamogeton epihydrus. Pondweed V. 2982 Potamogeton pectinatus. Pondweed #8. 2985 Potamogeton perfoliatus. Pondweed #9. 2988 Potamogeton pulcher. Pondx4eed #10. 2991 Proserpinoca spp. Mermaidweed. 2994 Prunella vulgaris. Heal-All. 2997 Pteridium aquilinum. Bracken Fern. 3000 Ptelimnium spp. Mock Bishop-s-Weed. 3003 PycnAnthemum. spp. Mountain-Mint. 3006 Ranunculus spp. Buttercup. 3009 Rhexia spp. Deergrass. 2912 Rhynchospora spp.,Beaked-Rush. 3015 Rhynchospora alba. White Beaked-Rush (Wt Beakd-Rush). 3018 Rhynchospora corniculata. Horned Rush. Herbaceous Plants - cont. 3021 Rorippa spp. Yellow Cress. 3024' Rorippa islandica. Yellow Cress. 3027 Rudbeckia spp. Coniflower. 3030 Rumex spp. Dock, Sorrel. 3033 Ruppia maritima. Tassel Pondweed (Tasel Pondweed). 3036 Sabatia spp. Sabatia. 3039 Sagittaria spp. Arrow-Head #1. 3042 Sagittaria engelmanniana. Arrow-Head #2. 3045 Sagittaria graminea. Arrow-Head #3. 3048 Sagittaria falcata. Lance-Leaved Arrow-Head (Lance Lv Ar Hd). 3051 Sagittaria latifolia. Arrow-Head A. 3054 Sagittaria subulata. Arrow-Head #5. 3057 Salicornia spp. Glasswort. 3060 Salsola kali. Saltwort. 3063 Salvia spp. Sage. 3066 Samolus parviflorus. Wate'r-Pimpernel. 3069 Sanguinaria canadensis. Bloodroot. 3072 Sanguisorba spp. 3075 Sanicula spp. Black Snakeroot. 3078 Sarracenia spp. Pitcher., Plant. 3091 Satureja spp. Savory. 3094 Saururus cernuus. Lizard Tail. 3097 Saxifraga spp. Saxifrage. 3100 Scirpus spp. Club-Rush. 3103 Scleria spp. Nut Rush. 3106 Sedum spp. Stonecrop. 3109 Selaginella apoda. Selaginella. 3112 Senicio spp. Squaw-Weed. 3115 Seriocarpus asteroides. White-Topped Aster.- 3118 Setaria spp. Foxtail Grass. 3111 Sicyos angulatus, Burr-Cucumber. 3124 Silene spp. Catchfly. 3127 Sisyrinchium. spp. Blue-Eyed Grass (Blu-Eyed Grass). 3130 Sisyrinchium angustifolium. Stout Blue-Eyed Grass (St Blu-Eyd Gras). 3133 Sium. suave. Water Parsnip. 3136 Smilacina racemosa. False Solomon Seal (Fls Solmn Seal). 3137 Smilax pseudo-china. False China Root (Fls China-Root). 3139 Solidago spp. Goldenrod. 3142 Sorgum halepense. Johnson-Grass. 3145 Sparganium spp. Bur-Reed. 3148 Spartina patens. Salt Meadow Grass. 3149 Spartina cynosuroides. Salt-Reed Grass. 3151 Sphagnum spp. Sphagnum. 3154 Sphenopholis spp. Eatons Grass. 3157 Spiranthes spp. Ladies-Tresses. 3160 Spirodela polyrhiza. Greater Duckweed (Grt Duckweed). 3163 Sporabolus spp. Rush-Grass. 3166 Stellaria spp. Chickweed. 3169 Strophostyles spp. Wild Bean. 3172 Stylosanthes spp. Pencil Flower. 3175 Symplocarpus foetidus. Skunk Cabbage. 3178 Taraxacum spp.,Dandeli -on. 3181 Teucrium'canadense.. Wood-Sage. 3184 Thalictrum spp. Meadow Rue. -113- Herbaceous Plants - cont. 3187 Tipularia discolor. Crane-Fly Orchis (Crn-Fly Orchis). 3190 Tovara virginiana. Jumpseed. .3193 Tradescantia virginiana. Spiderwort. 3194 Trapa spp. Waterchestnut. 3196 Trifolium spp. Clover. 3199 Trillium spp. Wake-Robin. 3202 Triosteum spp. Horse Gentian. 3205 Triplasis purpurea. Sand-Grass. 3208 Tripsacum dactyloides. Gama Grass. 3211 Typha angustifolia. Narrow-Leaved Cat-Tail. 3214 Typha domingensis. Southern Ca.t-Tail. 3217 Typha latifolia. Common Cat-Tail. . 3220 Urtica spp. Stinging Nettle (Stinging Nettl). 3223 Uniola spp. Uniola. 3226 Uniola latifolia. Broad-Leaved Spike Grass (Bd-Lv Spk Grs). 3229 Uniola laxa. Slender Spike Grass (Sl Spike Grass). 3230 Urtica dicila. Stinging Nettle (Stng Nettle). 3232 Utricularia spp. Bladderwort. 3235 Uvularia spp. Bellwort. 3238 Valerianella spp. Lamb's-Lettuce. 3241 Vallisneria americana. Tape Grass. 3244 Veratrum viride. American White Hellebore (Am Wt Helebore). 3247 Verbascum spp. Mullein. 3250 Verbena spp. Vervain. 3253 Verbesina spp. Crown-Beard. 3256 Vernonia spp. Ironweed. 3259 Veronica spp. Speedwell. 3262 Vicia spp. Vetch. 3265 Vinca minor. Periwinkle. 3268 Viola spp. Violet. 3269 Wolffia spp. Water-Meal. 3271 Woodwardia areolata. Netted Chain Fern (Nettd Chan Frn). 3274 Woodwardia virginica. Virginia Chain Fern. 3277 Xanthium spp. Cocklebur. 3280 Xyris spp. Yellow-Eyed Grass. 3283 Yucca filamentosa. Silkgrass. 3286 Zannichellia palustris. Horned Pondweed. 3289 Zizania aquatica. Wild Rice. 3292 Zizaniopsis miliacea. Water Millet. 3295 Zizia aptera. Zizia. 3298 Zostera marina. Eelgrass. 3301 Lichens. 3304 Unknown Fern. 3307 Unknown Herb. 3310 Unknown Grass. 3313 Unknown Sedge. 3316 Unknown Moss. Sources: Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th ed. American Book Co., New York. - Higman, Daniel. 1975. Addition to: An Ecologically Annotated Checklist of the@Vascular Flora at the Chesapeake Bay Center for Field Biology,. Chesapeake Bay Center for Field Biology. Rhode River. (Unpublished). -114- Herbaceous Plants - Sources - cont. Mercer, W. 0. 1969. Taxonomic and EcoloAical Survey of the Flora of Calvert County, Maryland. Masters Thesis. University of Maryland. College Park. Sterber, Michael T. C.S.V. 1967. "The Vascular Flora of Anne Arundel County, Maryland: An Annotated Checklist." Castanea 36:263-312. -115- %AMA ffs MMM, PgL?gN X@L' TO. N NO i ; rl" BIRDS rd NUMBER SPECIES P@ NUMBER SPECIES @-4 6007 Common Loon 3,'2 6332 Sharp-Shinned Hawk 3 2 6011 Red-throated Loon 3,2 6333 Cooper's Hawk 3,3 6002 Red-necked Grebe 3,3 6337 Red-Tailed Hawk 4,2 6003 Horned Grebe 3,2 6339 Red-Shouldered Hawk 4j2 6006 Pied-billed Grebe 4,2 6343 Brood-Winged Hawk 1,2 6117 Gannet 3,3 6347 Rough-Legged Hawk 3,2 6120 Double-Cr. Cormorant 2,2 6349 Golden Eagle 3,3 6194 Great Blue Heron 4,2 6352 Bald Eagle 4,4 6201 Green Heron 1,1 6331 Marsh Hawk 3,2 6200 Little Blue Heron 1,2 6364 Osprey 1,1 6198 Cattle Egret 1,2 6356 Peregrine Falcon 3,4 6196 Common Egret 1,2 6357 Merlin 3,3 6197 Snowy Egret 1,2 6360- American Kestrel 4,2 6199 Louisiana Heron 1,2 6289 Bobwhite 4,1 6202 Blk.-Cr. Night Heron 4,2 6309 Rg-Necked Pheasant .4,2 6203 Yel.-Cr. Night Heron 1,3 6208 King Rail 4,2 6191 Least Bittern 1,2 6211 Clapper Rail 4,2 6190 American Bittern 1,2 6212 Virginia Rail 4,2 6186 Glossy This 1,2 6214 Sora 1,3 6178 Mute Swan 4,3 6216 Black Rail 1,3 6180 Whistling Swan 3,2 6218 Purple Gallinule 1,3 6172 Canada Goose 3,2 6219 Common Gallinule 1,2 6171 Wt.-Fronted Goose 2,3 6221 American Coot 3,2 6169 Snow Goose 3,2 6274 Semipalmated Plover 1,2 6132 Mallard 4,2 6277 Piping Plover 1,2 6133 Black Duck 4,2 6273 Killdeer 4,2 6135 Gadwall 2,2 6270 Blk-Bellied Plover 3,2 6143 Pintail 3,2 6283 Ruddy Turnstone 2,3 6139 Green-Winged Teal 3,2 6228 Am. Woodcock 4,2 6140 Blue-Winged Teal 4,2 6230 Common Snipe 3,2 6136 European Wigeon' 3,3 6265 Whimbrel 2,2 6137 American Wigeon 3,2 6261 Upland Plover 2,3 6142 Shoveler 3,3 6263 Spotted Sandpiper 1,2 6144 Wood Duck 1,2 6256 Solitary Sandpiper 2,2 6146 Redhead 3,2 6258 Willet 1,2 6150 Ring-Necked Duck 3,2 6254 Greater Yellowlegs 2,2 6147 Canvasback 3,2 6255 Lesser Yellowlegs 2,2 6148 Greater Scaup 3,2 6234 Knot 2,3 6149 Lesser Scaup 3,2 6239 Pectoral Sandpiper 2,2 6151 Common Goldeneye 3,2 6240 White-Rumped Sandpiper 2,2 6153 Bufflehead 3,2 6241 Baird's Sandpiper 2,3 6154 Oldsquaw 3,2 6242 Least Sandpiper 3,2 6165 White-winged Scoter 3,2 6243 Dunlin 3,2 6166 Surf Scoter 3,2 6231 Short-B. Dowitcher 2,2 6163 Black Scoter 3,2 6233 Stilt Sandpiper 2,2 6167 Ruddy Duck 3,2 6246 Semipalm. Sandpiper 2,2 6131 Hooded Merganser 4,3 6247 Western Sandpiper 2,2 6129 Common Merganser 3,2 6262 Buff-Br. Sandpiper 2-3 6130 Red-Br. Merganser 3,2 6249 Marbled Godwit 2:3 6325 Turkey Vulture 4,1 6248 Sanderling 4,2 6326 Black Vulture 4,1 6225 American Avocet 2,3 _119- W (U (U k NUMBER SPECIES P@ NUMBER SPECIES 6223 Northern Phalarope 2,2 6617 Rough-Wing. Swallow 1,2 6042 Glaucous Gull 3,2 6613 Barn Swallow I'l 6043 Iceland Gull 3,2 6612 Cliff Swallow 1,2 6047 Gt. Blk-Backed Gull 4,1 6611 Purple Martin 1,1 6051 Herring Gull 4,1 6477 Blue Jay 4,2 6054 Ring-Billed Gull 4,1 6488 Common Crow 4,2 6058 Laughing Gull 1,2 6490 Fish Crow 4,2 6060 Bonaparte's Gull 2,2 6736 Carolina Chickadee 4,1 6063 Gull-Billed Tern 1,2 6731 Tufted Titmouse 4,1 6069 Forster's Tern 1,2 6727 White Br. Nuthatch 4,2 6070 Common Tern 1,1 6728 Red Br. Nuthatch 3,2 6074 Least.Tern 1,2 6729 Brown-Head. Nuthatch 4,1 6065 -Royal Tern 1,2 6726 Brown Creeper 4,2 6064 Caspian Tern 2,2 6121 House Wren 1,1 6077 Black Tern 2,2 6722 Winter Wren 3,2 6080 Black Skimmer 1,2 6718 Carolina Wren 4,1 6316 Mourning Dove 4,1 6725 Lg. Bill. Marsh Wren 4,2 6387 Yellow-Billed Cuckoo 1,1 6724 Sht.-Bill. Marsh Wren 1,2 6388 Black-Billed Cuckoo 1,2 6703 Mockingbird 4,1 6365 Barn Owl 4,2 6704 Catbird 4,2 6373 Screech Owl 4,1 6705 Brown Thrasher 4,2 6375 Great Horned Owl 4,1 6761 American Robin 4,1 6368 Barred Owl , 4,1 6755 Wood Thrush 1,1 6366 Long-Eared Owl 4,3 6759 Hermit Thrush 3,1 6367 Short-Eared Owl 3,2 6758 Swainson's Thrush 2,2 6372 Saw-Whet Owl 4,3 6757 Gray-Cheeked Thrush 2,2 6416 'Chuck-Will's Widow I'l 6756 Veery 1,1 6417 Whip-Poor-Will 1,1 6766 Eastern Bluebird 4,2 6420 Common Nighthawk 1,2 6751 Blue-Gr. Gnatcatcher 1,1 6423 Chimney Swift 1,1 6748 Golden-Cr. Kinglet 4,2 6428 Ruby-T. Hummingbird 1,2 6749 Ruby-Cr. Kinglet 3,2 6390 Belted Kingfisher 4,2 6697 Water Pipit 3,2 6412 'Yellow-Sh. Flicher 4,2 6619 Cedar Waxwing 4,2 6405 Pileated Woodpecker 4,2 6622 Loggerhead Shrike 4,3 6409 Red-Bellied Woodpecker 4,1 6493 Starling 4,1 6406 Red-Headed Woodpecker 4,2 6631 White-Eyed Vireo 1,2 6402 Yellow-B. Sapsucker 4,2 6628 Yellow-Throat. Vireo 1,2 6393 Hairy Woodpecker 4,2 6629 Solitary Vireo 1,2 6394 Downy Woodpecker 4,1 6624 Red-Eyed Vireo 1,1 6444 Eastern Kingbird 1,2 6626 Philadelphia Vireo 2,3 6452 Gt. Crest. Flycatcher 1,1 6627 Warbling Vireo ' 1,2 6456 Eastern Phoebe 1,2 6636 Blk.-&-White Warbler 1,2 6463 Yellow-Bellied Flyc. 2,2 6637 Prothonotary Warbler 1,1 6465 Acadian Flycatcher 1,1 6639 Worm-Eating Warbler 1,2 6466 @Traill's Flycatcher 1,3 6642 Golden-Wing. Warbler 1,2 6467 Least Flycatcher 1,2 6641 Blue-Winged Warbler 1,2 6461 Eastern Wood Peewee 1,2 6647 Tennessee Warbler 1,2 6459 Olive-Sided Flyc. 2,2 6645 Nashville Warbler -2,2 6474 Horned Lark 4,2 6648 Parula Warbler 1,3 6614 Tree Swallow 1,2 6652 Yellow Warbler 1,2 6616 Bank Swallow 1,2 6657 Magnolia Warbler 1,1 6650 Cape May Warbler 2,2 -120- NUMBER SPECIE9@ NUMBER SPECIES 4) @4 6654 Blk. Thr. Blue Warb. 1,1 6549 Sharp-Tail. Sparrow 4,2 6655 Myrtle Warbler 3,1 6550 Seaside Sparrow 4,2 6667 Blk. Thr. Green War. 1,1 6540 Vesper Sparrow 6658 Cerulean Warbler 1,2 6575 Bachman's Sparrow 1,3 6662 Blackburnian Warbler 1,2 6567 Slate-Colored Junco 4,2 6663 Yel.-Throated Warbler 1,1 6559 Tree Sparrow 3,1 Chestnut-Sided Warbler 1,1 6560 Chipping Sparrow 4,2 6660 Bay-Breast.. Warbler 2,2 6563 Field Sparrow 4,1 6661 Blackpoll Warbler 2,2 6554 White-Crown. Sparrow 3,2 6671 Pine Warbler 4,2 6558 White-Thr. Sparrow 3,1 .6673 Prairie Warbler 1,1 6585 Fox Sparrow 3,2 6672 Palm Warbler 3,3 6583 Lincoln's Sparrow 2,2 6674 Oven Bird 1,1 6584 Swamp Sparrow 4,1 6675 North. Waterthrush 1,2 6581 Song Sparrow 4,1 6676 La. Waterthrush 1,2 6536 Lapland Longspur 3,3 6677 Kentucky Warbler 6534 Snow Bunting 3,2 6678 Connecticut Warbler 2,2 6310 Wild Turkey 4,3 6679 Mourning Warbler 2,2 6681 Yellowthroat 4,1 6683 Yellow-Breast. Chat 1,1 6684 Hooded Warbler 1,1 Wilson's Warbler 2,3 Source: 6686 Canada-.Warbler 1,1 6687 American Redstart 1,1 1974. List of Species 6688 House Sparrow 4,1 Numbers and Recommende and Sizes. 6494 Bobolink 1,2 American Ornithological'Union. 6501 Eastern Meadowlark 4,1 6498 Red-Wing. Blackbird. 4,1 Robbins, Chandler S. and Willet T. 6506 Orchard Oriole 1,1 Van Velzen. 1968. Field List of the 6507 Baltimore Oriole 1,2 Birds of Maryland. Maryland Ornithological Rusty Blackbird 3,2 Society. Baltimore. 6513 Boat-Tailed Grackle 4,2 6511 Common Grackle 4011 6495 Brown-Head. Cowbird 4,2 6608 Scarlet Tanager 1,1 6610 Summer Tanager 1,2 6593 Cardinal 4,1 Rose-Br. Grosbeak 1,2 6597 Blue Grosbeak 1,2 6598 Indigo Bunting 1,1 6604 Dickcissel 1,3 Evening Grosbeak 3,2 6517 Purple Finch 4,2 6519 House Finch 4,2 6533 Pine Siskin 3,3 6529 American Goldfinch 4,2 Red Crossbill 3,3 6587 Rufous-Sided Towhee 4,2 6542 Savannah Sparrow 4,2 6546 Grasshopper Sparrow 1,1 .6547 Henslow's Sparrow 1,2 4@2 ggj- MAMMALS 5034 Bat, Big Brown. Eptesicus fuscus. 4,1 5035 Bat, Eastern Pipistrelle. Pipistrellus subfl4vus. 5036 Bat, Evening. Nycticeius humeralis. 1:2 5037 Bat, Hoary. Lasiurus cinereus. 2,3 5038 Bat, Keen's Myotis. Myotis keenii. 4,1 5039 ,Bat, Little Brown. Myotis lucifugus. 4,1 5040 Bat, Red. Lasiurus borealis. 4,1 5041 Bat, Silver Haired. Lasionycteris noctivagans. 2,- 5002 Beaver. Castor *canadensis. 4,2 5026 Chipmunk, Eastern. Tamias striatus. 4,1 5025 Cottontail, Eastern. Sylvilagus floridanus. 4,1 5015 Deer, White-Tailed. Odocoileus virginianus. 4,1 5028. Fox, Gray. Urocyon cinereoargenteus. 4,1 5030 Fox, Red. Vulpes vulpes. 4,1 5042 Lemming, Southern Bog. Synaptomus cooperi. 4,_ 5014 Mink. Mustela vison. 4,- 5021 Mole, Eastern. Scalopus aquaticus. 5004 Mole, Star-Nosed. Condylura cristata. 4,1 5043 Mouse, Deer. Peromyscus maniculatus. 4,2 5044 Mouse, Eastern Harvest. ,Reithrodontomys humulis. 4,3 .5012 Mouse, House. Mus musculus. 4,1 5031 Mouse, Meadow Jumping. Zapus hudsonius. 4,1 5018 Mouse, White-Footed. Peromyscus leucopus. 4,1 5016 Muskrat. Ondatra zibethicus. 4,1 .5006 Opossum. Didelphis marsupialis. 4,1 5008 Otter, River. Lutra canadensis. 4,1 5020 Raccoon. Procyon lotor. 4,1 5017 Rat, Marsh Ric6. Orzomys palustris. 4,1 5045 Rat Norway. Rattus norvegicus. 4,1 5005 Shrew, Least. Cryptotis.parva. 4,1 5024 Shrew, Masked. Sorex cinereus. 4,1 5046 Shrew, Pigmy. Microsorex hoyi. 4,3 5001: Shrew, Short-Tailed. Blarina brevicauda. 4,1 5047 Shrew, Southeastern. Sorex longirostris. 4,3 5010 Skunk, Striped. Mephitis mephitis. 4,- 5023 Squirrel, Eastern Fox. Sciurus niger vul@inus. 4,3 5022 Squirrel, Gray. Sciurus carolinensis. 4,1 5027 Squirrel, Red. Tamiasciurus hudsonicus. 41)2 5007 Squirrel, Southern Flying. Glaucomys volans. 4,1 5011 Vole, Meadow. Microtus pennsylvanicus. 4,1 5048 Vole, Pine. Pitymys pinetorum. 4,1 5013 Weasel, Long-Tailed. Mustela frenata. 4,_ 5032 Woodchuck. Marmota monax. 4,1 Source: Paradiso, John L. 1969. Mammals of Maryland. North American Fauna, Number 66, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. -125- HI@RPTILES CAUDATA Q) $-4 P@ rX, 7006 Dusky salamander, Northern. Desmognathus fuscus fuscus. 4,- 7009. Four-toed salamander. Hemidactylium scutatum. 4,- 7001 Hellbender. Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis. 4,4 7013 Long-tailed salamander., Eurycea longicauda longicauda. 45- 7004 Marbled salamander. Ambystoma opacum. 4$- 7010 Mud salamander, Eastern. Pseudotriton montanus montanus. 4,- 7007 Red-backed salamander. Plethodon cinereus ' cinereus. 4s- 7011 Red salamander, Northern. Pseudotriton 'ruber ruber. 4s- 7002 Red-spotted newt. Notophthalmus viridescens viridescens. 4$_ 7008 Slimy salamander. Plethodon glutinos us glutinosus. 4s- 7003 Spotted salamander. Ambystoma maculatum. 4,_ 7005 Tiger salamander, Eastern. Ambystoma tigrinum.tigrinum. 4,4 7012 Two-lined salamander, Northern. Eurycea bislineata bislineata. 4,- SALIENTIA 7021 American toad. Bufo americanus americanus. 4.)_ 7028 Bullfrog. Rana catesbeiana. 411- 7023 Cricket frog, Northern. Acris crepitans crepitans. 4 - 7022 Fowler's toad. Bufo woodhousei fowleri. 4:- 7027 Gray treefrog. Eastern. Hyla versicolo.r.. 4,- 7034 Gray treefrog., Southern. Hyla chrysoscelis. 4,- 7029 Green frog. Rana clamitans melanota. 4,- 7025 Green treefrog. Hyla cinerea. 4,- 7031 Leopard frog, Northern. Rana pipiens. 7035 Leopard frog, Southern. Rana utricularia utricularia. 4,- 7036 Narrow-mouthed toad, Eastern. Gastrophryne carolinensis. 4,4 7037 New Jersey chorus frog. Pseudacris triseriata kalmi. 4,- 7030 Pickerel frog. Rana palustris. 4,- 7020 Spadefoot, Eastern. Scaphiopus holbrooki holbrooki. 41,- 7026 Spring peeper, Northern. Hyla crucifer crucifer. 4,- 7038 Upland chorus frog. Pseudacris triseriata feriarum. 4,- 7032 Wood frog. Rana sylvatica sylvatica. 4s- SQUAMATA (SAURIA) 7073 Broad-headed skink. Eumeces laticeps. 4,- 7070 Fence lizard, Northern. Sceloporus undulatus hyacinthinus. 4$1 7072 Five-lined skink. Eumeces fasciatus. 4,1 7074 Six-lined racerunner. Cnemidophorus sexlineatus sexlineatus- 4$- 7071 Ground skink. Leiolopisma laterale. 4,2 -129- AQUAMATA (SERPENTES) Resid. Freq. 7044 Black racer, Northern. Coluber constrictor constrictor. 4,1 7046 Black rat snake. Elaphe obsoleta obsoleta. 4,1 7054 Brown snake, Northern. Storeria dekayi dekayi. 4,1 7059 Copperhead, Northern. Agkistrodon contortrix mokasen. 4,1 7045 Corn snake. Elaphe guttata guttata. 4,3 7056 Earth snake, Eastern. Virginia valeriae valeriae. 4 3 7050 Garter snake, Eastern. Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis. 4,1 7042 Hognose snake, Eastern. Heterodon platyrhinos. 4,1 7047 Kingsnake, Eastern. Lampropeltis getulus getulus. 4,- 7049 Milk snake, Coastal plain. Lampropeltis triangulum temporalis. 4 3 7048 Milk snake, Eastern. Lampropeltis triangulum triangulum. 4,- 7060 Mole snake. Lampropeltis calligaster rhombomaculata. 4,2 7052 Queen snake. Natrix septemvittata. 4,1 7061 Rainbow snake. Farancia erytrogramma erytrogramma. 4,4 7055 Red-bellied snake, Northern. Storeria o. occipitomaculata. 4,2 7057 Ribbon snake, Eastern. Thamnophis sauritus sauritus. 4,- 7041 Ringneck snake, Northern. Diadophis punctatus edwardsi. 4,- 7043 Rough green snake. Opheodrys aestivus. 4,1 7050 Scarlet snake, Northern. Cemophora coccinea copei. 4,3 7062 Timber rattlesnake. Crotalus horridus horridus. 4,2 7053 Water snake, Northern. Natrix sipedon sipedon. 4,1 7040 Worm snake, Eastern. Carphophis amoenus amoenus. 4,1 CHELONIA 7091 Atlantic green turtle. Chelonia mydas mydas. 2,4 7092 Atlantic leatherback. Dermochelys coriacea coriacea. 2,4 7093 Atlantic loggerhead. Caretta caretta caretta. 2,4 7094 Atlantic ridley. Lepidochelys kempi. 2,4 7084 Bog-turtle. Clemmys muhlenbergi. 4,4 7085 Box turtle, Eastern. Terrapene carolina carolina. 4,1 7095 Cumberland turtle. Feral. Chrysemys scripta troosti. 4,- 7086 Diamondback terrapin, Northern. Malaclemys terrapin terrapin- 4,1 7087 Map turtle. Graptemys geographica. 4,- 7081 Mud-turtle, Eastern. Kinosternon subrubrum. subrubrum. 4,1 7088 Painted turtle, Eastern. Chrysemys picta picta. 4,1 7089 Red-bellied turtle. Chrysemys rubriventris. 4,1 7096 Red-eared turtle. Feral. Chrysemys scripta elegans. 4,- 7082 Snapping turtle-, Common. Chelydra serpentina serpentina. 4,1 7083 Spotted turtle. Clemmys guttata. 4,1 7080 Stinkpot. Sternotherus odoratus. 4,1 4,1 7097 Wood.turtle. Clemmys-insculpta. 4,1 Sources: 1973. "Endangered Amphibians and Reptiles of Maryland: A Special Report." Bulletin of the Maryland Herpetological Society. The Natural History Society of Maryland, Inc. Vol. 9, No. 3. Harris, Herbert S. 1975. "Distributional Survey (Amphibia/Reptilia): Maryland and D.C." Bulletin of the;Maryland Herpet logical Society. The Natural History Society of Maryland, Inc. Vol. 11, No. 3. McCauley, Robert H. Jr. Ph.D.,1945. The Reptiles of Maryland the District of Columbia. Hagerstown, Maryland. A WN "MRS D & D+ SOILS Anne Arundel County Charles County Bm Bibb (D) Bo - Bibb (D) Ck, Cm, - Colemantown (D) Ek - Elkton (D) Ek, En - Elkton (D) Fs - Fallsington (D) Fa Fallsington (D) Le - Leonardtown (D) Mt Mixed Alluvial (D+) Os, Ot - Othello (D) Os Osier (D) Ov - Osier (D)'.. Ot Othello (D) Sr, Ss - Shrewsbury (D) Harford County Baltimore County Ad - Aldino (D) Av - Alluvial (D) Ad - Aldino (D) Ba - Baile (D) Av - Alluvial (D) Cr - Chrome (D) Ba - Baile (D) En - Elkton (D) Co, Cn - Chrome (D) Fs - Fallsington (D) Du - Dunning (D) Hb - Hatboro (D) Em, En, Eo - Elkton (D) Ke, Kf - Kelly (D) Fa, Fs - Fallsington (D) Kr - Kinkara (D) Hb - Hatboro (D) Lr - Leonardtown (D) Ke, Ks, Ku - Kelly (D) Ot - Othello (D) Ll, Lm, Ln, Lo - Lenoir (D) Wa, Wc - Wachung (D) Lr - Lenardtown (D) Mh, Mo - Meluin (D) Ot - Othello (D) Prince Georges County Po - Pocomoke (D) Wa, Wc - Wachung (D) Bn, Bo, Br - Bibb (D) Cl - Colemantown (D) Ek, El - Elkton (D) Calvert County Fl, Fs, Fu - Fallsington (D) Ha - Hatboro (D) Ek - Elkton (D) Hy - Hyde (D) Fs - Fallsington (D) +) Jo, Ju - Johnston (D) Mu - Mixed Alluvial (D Le - Leonardtown (D) Ot - Othello (D) Mw - Mixed Alluvial (D+) 01, Ot - Othello (D) Pr - Plummer (D) Cecil County Sm, Sn Shrewsbury (D) Ad - Aldino (D) Ba - Baile (D) Cm, Cn - Chrome (D) El, Em - Elkton (D) Fa, Fm - Fallsington (D) Ha - Hatboro (D) Lo - Leonardtown (D) Mu - Mixed Alluvial (D"+. Oh - Othello (D) Wa - Wachung (D) -133- WELL -DRAINED SOILS Anne ArundelCounty Calvert County Ca, Cb - Chillum Ev - Evesboro Cc, Cd - Christiana Ho, Hw, Hy - Howell Cn, Cc, Cp - Collington Ml - Marr Cr Comus Mm, Mn - Matapeake Cs, Ct - Croom Oc - Ochlockonee Eo, Es, Eu, Er - Evesboro Rd, Re - Rumford Ga Galestown Sa, Sh, Sl, Sp, Sr.- Sassafras Hf, Hg, Hs, Ht, Hy, Hz Howell Wa - Westphalia Mf Marr Mk, Mm, Matapeake Mu, Mv, Mw, Mx - Monmouth Cecil County My, Mz - Muirkirk Ru, Ry - Rumford Au - Aura Sa, Sf, Sn - Sassafras Ce - Chester Wa Westphalia Ch - Chillum ClB2 - Christiana Cm, Cn - Chrome Baltimore County Cs, Ct - Collington Cu - Comus Bm, Bn - Baltimore Eo - Elsinboro Bw, By - Brandywine Ev - Evesboro Cc, Cg - Chester Ge - Glenelg Ch, Ck, Cl - Chillum Le, Lg - Legore Cm - Christiana Ml, Mm - Manor Cn, Co - Chrome Series Mn, Mo - Matapeake Cv - Comus Mt, Mv, My - Montalto Cw - Conestoga Ne - Neshaminy Ed, Eg - Edgemont Ru - Rumford Eh, Ek, El - Elioak Sa, Sg, Sf, Sr Sassafras Es - Elsinboro Ft - Fort Mott Ga - Galestown Gc, Gg, Gl - Glenelg Ha - Hagerstown Ho, Hr, Hs - Hollinger Jp, Ju - Joppa Le, Lf, Lg, Lh -'Legore Mb, Mc, Md, Me, Mg, Mh Manor Mk - Matapeake Ms - Montalto Mt - Mt. Airy Ne - Neshaminy Re, Rs, Ry - Relay Sh, Sl, Sn, Ss - Sassafras Su - Sunnyside Charles County Prince Georges County Au. - Aura ChB, ChC - Chillum Au, AV - Aura CrB, CrC - Croom Ca, Cb - Chillum Eqv - Evesboro Cc, Cd, Ce, Cf - Christiana Ga. - Galestown Cm, Co - Collington GvE - Gravelly Land Cr - Comus Mg - Magnolia Cs, Ct, Cu - Croom M1 - Marr Em, En, Eu - Elsinboro Mm, Mn - Matapeake Ge, Re, We - Evesboro Oc - Ocklockonee Ga, Gd, Gm, Ge - Gaiestown Gn, Go - Glenelg Rd, Rg - Rumford Hc - Howell SaE - Sandy Land Mf, Mg - Magnolia Sh - Sassafras Mh, Mk - Manor Wa, We - Westphalia Ml - Marr Wk, Wm - Wickham Mn, Mm, MP - Matapeake Mx - Monmouth Harford County Mz - Muirkirk Oc, Oh, Ok - Ochlockonee Rd, Re - Rumford Br - Brandywine Cc, Cg - Chester SaE - Sandy Land Ch, Ck - Chillum Sf, Sg, Sl, Sh, Sk - Sassafras CrE Chrome St, Su, Sw - Sunnyside Cv - Comus Wa, Wb, We - Westphalia Eh - Elioak ES - Elsinboro EvC Evesboro Gc, Gg - Gleneig Jp Joppa Le, Lg, Lf - Legore Mb, Mc, Md, Mg - Manor Mk Matapeake Ms Montalto Ne, Ns - Neshaminy Sh, Sl, SS - Sassafras Wh - Whiteford -135- Mull, NO m t --, -4 WATERSHED DESIGNATIONS STATE OF MARYLAND WATER RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION Watershed Designations Major Basin Minor Basin Sub-Basin Segment 02-13-99 Chesapeake Bay (Proper) -98 Lower Chesapeake Bay (below north side original Bay Bridge) - 99 Upper Chesapeake Bay (above north side original Bay Bridge) 02-12-02 Lower Susquehanna River Area - 3 -01 Susquehanna River (below Conowingo Dam) -02- Dear Creek drainage -03 Octoraro Creek drainage -05 Susquehanna Ri.ver (above Dam) -o6 Broad Creek drainage -07 Castleton area drainage -o8 Oakwood area drainage -00 Pennsylvania line area drainage -10 Havre De Grace area drainage -11 Bainbridge area drainage -12 Camp Ramblewood area drainage -15 Susquehanna River (Pennsylvania area) drainage 02-13-06 Elk River Area - 9 -01 Sassafras River drainage 02 Elk River, mainstem -03 Bohemia River drainage -o4 Back Creek drainage -o6 Northeast River drainage -07 Furnace Bay area drainage -o8 Stillpond - Fairlee area drainage -09 Christina River drainage (Delaware) -10 Crystal Beach area drainage -11 Elk Neck (Elk River) area drainage -12 Port Herman area drainage -13 Elk River headwaters area drainage -14 Elk Neck (Bay) area drainage -139- 92-15@07 Bush River Area 10 -01, Swan Creek drainage -012 Bush River drainage -03 Bynum Run drainage -o4 Winters Run drainage -05 Aberdeen Proving Ground area drainage -06 Susquehanna Flats area drainage 02@13-o8 Gunpowder River Area -01 Gunpowder River drainage -02 Gunpowder Falls drainage -013 Little Gunpowder Falls drainage -o4 Bird River drainage -05 Middle River drainage -o6, Browns Creek area drainage -07 Seneca Creek drainage O@-13-09 Patapsco River Area - 12 -01 Back River drainage -0@ South Branch Patapsco River drainage -03 North Branch Patapsco River drainage -04 Patapsco River drainage (confluence North and South Branch. to Hanover Street Bridge) -05 Inner Baltimore Harbor (Patapsco River from Hanover Street to straight line between Hawkins Point and Sollers Point) -o6 North drainage to Inner Baltimore Harbor -w Outer Baltimore Harbor drainage (straight line between Rock Point and North Point from Sollers Point) -08 South drainage to Inner Baltimore Harbor -09 Bodkin area drainage -10 Shallow Creek drainage 02-13"10 West Chesapeake Bay Area - 13 -01 Magothy River drainage -02 Severn River drainage -03 South River drainage -A West River drainage -05 Other drainage of West Chesapeake Bay area -o6 Beverly Beach area drainage -07 Bay Ridge area drainage -o8 Broadneck area drainage -05 Pinehurst Gibson area drainage -140- 02-18-11 Patuxent River Area 14 -01 Patuxent River, mainstem. -02 Western Run (Branch) drainage -03 Little Patuxent River drainage A Middle Patuxent River drainage :05 Other drainage of Patuxent River area (directly into Chesapeake Bay) -o6 Patuxent River east area drainage -07 Patuxent River southwest area drainage -o8 Patuxent River west area drainage -09 Patuxent River headwaters area drainage o2,14-'ol. Lower Potomac River Area 16 -02 Lower Potomac River, mainstem (from mouth to Marshall Hall) Saint Mary's River drainage -o4 Saint George Creek drainage -05 Breton Bay drainage -o6 Saint Clement Bay drainage -07 Wicomico River drainage -o8 Gilbert Swamp drainage -09 Zekiah Swamp drainage -10 Port Tobacco River drainage -11 Nanjemoy Creek drainage 12 Nattawoman Creek drainage ;-13 Potomac River mouth area drainage -14 Huggins Point Strait Point area drainage -15 White Neck Point to Colton Point area drainage @16 Morgantown area drainage -17 Cedar Point area drainage -18 Chicamuxen Creek to Riverside area drainage -19 Potomac Heights area drainage -20 Lower Potomac River area Virginia drainage 02-14-02 Washington Metropolitan Area - 17 -01 Potomac River, mainstem. (from Marshall Hall to FR/MO County Line) -02 Piscataway Creek drainage -03 Anacostia River drainage -o4 Rock Creek drainage -05 Bryan Point area drainage o6 Seneca Creek drainage -_07 Washington,D.C. south area drainage -o8 Central Washington,D.C. area drainage -09 Rockville-Bethesda area drainage -10 Poolesville area drainage -15 Washington-Metropolitan area Virginia drainage -141- CATEGORIES GEOLOGIC (Landform) 100i Gorges 1002 Distinctive mountain features .1003 Cliffs, Bluffs loo4 Natural rock outcrops of geologic significance 1005 Mannade rock outcrops of geologic-significance (road,cuts and quarries) loo6 Natural sand, beach, dune features 1007 Fossil evidence loo8 Scarp 1009 Otherunusual geologic formations SOILS 2101 Unusual soil groups; undisturbed by human activity HYDROLOGIC 3091 Significant and unusual water-land interfaces (i.e. islands; scenic stretches of coast, rivers, streams, lakes or ponds) 3092 Whitewater stretches 3093 Waterfalls 3o94 Natural Springs 3095 Marshes, bogs, swamps, flats (coastline) 3o96 Marshes, bogs, swamps, flats (inland) 3097 Aquifer recharge areas 3o98 Water areas supporting unusual or significant.freshwater aquatic life 3099 Lakes, ponds of unusually low productivity 3100 Lakes, ponds of unusually high productivity 3101 Unusual natural river, lake, pond 3102 Stream and marginal wetland habitat 3103 Floodplain 31o4 Lake or pond 3105 Other unusual hydrologic feature BIOLOGICAL FLORA, 4ool Rare, remnant or unique species of plants 4002 Unique plant community 4003 Plant communities unique to a geographic area 4oo4 Individual plant specimen(s) of unu sual significance (i.e. large- trees). 4005 Plant communities of-unusual age or-maturity 4oo6 Plant communities of unusual diversity and productivity 4007 Areas exhibiting outstanding seasonal color -145- Category Code Sheet cont. 4008 Forest 4oO Managed Forest 4olO Field or shrub vegetation BIOtOGICAL FAUNA (terrestrial animals) 5091 Habitat area of rare, endangered and unique species .5092 Habitat area of unusual significance to a fauna community (i.e. feeding, breeding, wintering, resting) 5093' Fauna communities unusual to a geographic area 5094, Habitat areas supporting fauna communities of unusual diversity and productivity 5095, Habitat areas exhibiting other interesting features BIOLOGICAL FAUNA (birds) 6001 Habitat areas of rare, endangered and unique species 6002 Habitat area of unusual significance to a fauna community (i.e. feeding, breeding, wintering, resting) 6oO3' Fauna community unusual to a geographic area 6oo4 Habitat areas supporting fauna communities of unusual diversity and productivity BIOLQ'GICAL FAUNA (aquatic life) 7091 Habitat areas of rare, endangered and unique species 7092 Habitat areas of unusual significance to a fauna community 7093 Fauna communities unusualto a geographic area 7094 Habitat areas supporting fauna communities of unusual diversity and productivity CULTURAL - AESTHETIC - VISUAL 8ool Manmade features having unusual aesthetic features or aesthetic significance due to natural setting (i.e. old mill along creek) 8002 Scenic gravel or unimproved roads 80D3 Vista points 8oo4 Trail systems 8005 Unusual juxtaposition of manmade and natural features 8oo6 Unusually scenic area -146- WETLAND WILDLIFE RATING A Wetland Wildlife Rating should be completed for all Natural Areas which include one or more of the wetland classes listed on the following page. These wetlands should be sampled according to the procedure outlined in the enclosed reprint by Frances C. Golet. The categories used in this procedure along with their significance coefficients and rank are summarized for your convenience. Encode the data choice which describes the wetlands in the appropriate boxes and record percent of border for each use by "Surrounding Habitat." Determine the significance coefficient for each choice and multiply by the rank to get subscores. Record and total the subscores, and round up to the nearest whole number to get the Wetland Wildlife Rating. Record the resulting score in the appropriate boxes on "Card 3." -149- Wetldnd Classes Class Dominant 5 acre minimum Richness Class Rank 1. Open water 5 or more 4,2 3.0 2. Deep marsh 4 3 2.5 3. Shallow marsh 3 7,6 2.0 4. Seasonally flooded flats 2 1,8 1.5 5. Meadow 1 5 1.0 6. Shrub swamp 7. Wooded swamp 8. Bog Size Rank 9. Very small - less than 10 acres 1.0 10. Small - 10-50 acres 1.5 11. Medium-sized - 51-100 acres 2.0 12. Large.- 101-500 acres 2.5 13. Very large - greater than 500 acres 3.0 Site.,Types Site Types Rank 14. Upland-isolated 17, 18, 19 3.0 15. Upland-lakeside 2.5 16. Bottomland-isolated 15, 16 2.0 17. Bottomland-lakeside 1.5 18. Bottomland-streamside 14 1.0 19. Bottomland-deltaic Cover Types 20. Cover occupies more than 95 percent of the wetland area. 21. Cover occupies 76-95 percent of the wetland area, occurring in a peripheral band. 22. Cover occupies 76-95 percent of the wetland area, occurring in dense patches or diffuse open stands. 23, Cover occupies 26-75 percent of the wetland area, occurring in a peripheral band. 24. Cover occupies 26-75 percent of the wetland area, occurring in dense patches or diffuse open stands. - I 25. Cover occupies 5-25 percent of the wetland area, occurring in a peripheral band. 26. Cover occupies 5-25 percent of the wetland area, occurring .in patches or diffuse open stands. 27. Cover occupies less than 5 percent of wetland area. -150- Cover Types (continued) Cover Types Rank 24 3.o 23 2.5 22,26 2.0 20,21,25 1.5 27 1.0 Surrounding Habitat Types Habitats Rank 28. Agricultural or open land 2 or more of 29. Forest land 28,29,30 making 3.0 30. Salt marshes up more than 90% 31. Mining or waste disposal area 1 or more of 32. Urban land 28,29',30 making 2.0 33. Outdoor recreation facilities up 50-90% 1 or more of 28,29,30 making 1.0 up less than 50% Vegetative Interspersion Rank 34. Type 1 1.0 35. Type 2 2.0 36. Type 3 3.0 Juxtaposition 37. Hydrologically connected to other wetlands (different dom. class) or open water*bodies within one mile. (or) Hydrologically connected to other wetlands (same dom. class) within 1/4 mile.. (or) Wetland greater than 500 acres, with three or more wetland classes (including deep marsh or shallow marsh). 38. Hydrologically connected to other wetlands (different dom. class) or open water bodies from 1-3 miles away. (or) Hydrologically connected to other wetlands (same dom. class) from 1/4-1 mile away. (or) Within 112 mile of other wetlands (different dom. class) or open water bodies, but not hydrologically connected. 39. All other possibilities Rank 37 3.0 38 2.0 39 1.0 CTASSIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS AS WILDLIFE HABITAT IN THE GLACIATED NORTHEAST 1,2 Francis C. Golet, Assistant Professor, Department of Forest and Wildlife Management, University Rhode Island. Abstract A detailed classification system for freshwater wetlands is presented along with ten criteria for the evaluation of wetlands as wildlife habitat. The results are based on a two-year field study of over 150 wetlands located throughout the state of Massachusetts. The major components of the classi- fication system include wetland classes and subclasses, based on the domi- nant life form of vegetation and surface water depth and permanence; size categories; topographic and hydrologic location; surrounding habitat types; proportions and interspersion of cover and waterand vegetative intersper- sion, These components are combined with wetland juxtaposition and water chemistry to produce criteria for metland evaluation. Using a system of specifications and ranks, wetlands can be arrayed according to their wild- life value for decision-making. Wetlands traditionally have been regarded as waste areas. More than one- third of the nation's total original wetland acreage has been obliterated, and the remaining acres are fast disappearing (Shaw and Predine, 1956). In the prairies and in the south, man has drained wetlands primarily for agri- cultural purposes. In the northeast, expansion of urban areas has created a growing need for land suitable for highway construction and commercial, industrial and housing development, often at the expense of wetlands. During the last 10 years, several northeastern states, realizing the natural values of freshwater wetlands, enacted laws to control their alteration. Implementation of these laws has been generally unsuccessful because decision- makers lack appropriate criteria for metland evaluation. In 1969 a research team of wildlife biologists, hydrogeologists, landscape planners and resource economists organized at the University of Massachusetts to develop a decision- makingmodel for public management of freshwater wetlands (Larson, 1971). This paper is a contribution of the Massachusetts Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. The work vas supported by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Water Resources Research, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-379), Dr. Joseph S. Larson, Principal Investigator. Reference: 1973. Trans. Northeast Fish & Wildlife Conf. 30:257-279. -152- This paper is a contribution of the wildlife sub-project toward evaluation of wetlands as wildlife habitat. Early in this study, it became clear that a detailed wetland classification system was prerequisite to development of criteria for evaluation. The national classification system devised by Martin et al. (1953) has been used widely, but it is too generalized.for wetlands research and management on a regidnal or statewide scale. Stewart and Kantrud (1971) produced a detailed system for the Prairie Pothole Region, but similar refinements are notably lacking in other parts of North America. Golet (1972) and Golet and Larson (1,974) have described several of the more prominent systems being used throughout the United States and Canada. Nearly all of these classification systems were developed to facilitate description and evaluation of waterfowl habitat. Because of the greatly expanded use of northeastern freshwater wetlands by educational groups, bird watchers, hikers, nature photographers, as well as.sportsmen, the standard for evaluation in this 'Study is maximum wildlife production and diversity. The classification system presented here identifies wetland features that determine the presence and abundance of a great variety of wildlife species. Criteria for wetland evaluation are developed from this system. Acknowledgments Special appreciation is extended to my major advisor, Dr. Joseph S. Larson, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts, for his advice and criticism throughout this study. I am grateful to Warren Blandin, Chief of Research; Richard Cronin, Chief of Information and Educa- tion; Harry Heusmann, Chief Waterfowl Biologist; and all district biologists of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Game who helped in various phaseis of this work. Massachusetts Audubon Society personnel identified many wetlands valuable for wildlife. Harry Ahles, Department of Botany, University of Massachusetts, reviewed the section on plant classification. Materials and Methods During 1970 a reconnaissance study provided.a broad range of qualitative data on the nature and diversity of 131 freshwater wetlands in Massachusetts. After refining earlier physiographic maps of the state (Office of River, Basin Studies, 1954;, Beaumont, 1956), 1 selected usually four or more U.S.G.S. map quadrangles as study areas within each physiographic region (Figure 1). These quadrangles were selected so as to include a maximum number of wetlands, a maximum diversity of surficial geologic substrates, both alkaline and acidic hydrochemical ground-vater facies (Motts and Saine6, 1969), and several vetlands deemed valuable as wildlife habitat by state.or federal wildlife agencies. Within each study area, I selected specific wetlands so as to achieve diver- sity with respect to the following criteria: hydrologic location, surficial -153- ------ ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS LEGEND I Berkshire Valley Lowland OF 2 Western Highland MASSACHUSETTS 3 Conn River Valley lowland k- A Central Upland STUDY AREAS0970) Alto STUDY WETLANDS (1971) Plat au olas:.,@r,-Sudb'@ry Lowland 7 Seaboard Lowland 8 Coastal lowland Study Quadrangle 1070 F1 Q, 0 Study Welland 1971 'I Ellu. Figure 1. Physiographic regions of Massachusetts, study areas for wetland reconnaissance (1970) and high value study i,.ietlands (1971). geologic substrate, wetland class as outlined by Martin et al. (1953), size, and' urban-rural context. Land-use maps (MacConnell and Garvin, 1956) were used in the selection and field study of wetlands. I obtained additional data from topographic maps, surficial geologic maps and 1:20,000 aerial photographs. During 1971 1 asked biologists from the Massachusetts Division of fisheries and Game and the Massachusetts Audubon Society to identify wetlands of high value to wildlife in the various physiographic regions. After adding several wetlands designated "high value" for waterfowl by the federal inventory (Office of River Basin Studies, 1954), 1 selected 38 high value wetlands and gathered detailed qualitative data on them in the field. The locations of these wetlands are designated by dots in Figure 1. Extensive literature reviem on the habitat requirements of wetland wildlife species supplemented field work (Golet, 1972). In addition, I reviewed and summarized nine years of unpublished water chemistry data collected by the Massachusetts Division ofTisheries and Game in 95 lakes and ponds located throughout the state. Results Classification of Freshwater Wetlands Life forms and sub-forms of wetland vegetation. The classification of plant life forms was the first step toward wetland classification. Five life forms and 18 sub-forms are recognized (Figures 2 and 3). The forms represent obvious divisions of vegetation: trees, shrubs, emergents, surface plants and submergents. Because differences in wildlife value often exist betiyeen plants belonging to the same life form, I have divided each form into sub- forms which reflect not only differences in structure, but differences in ecology and stand density as well. Below is a description of each life form and sub-form. Height classes given are average. Latin names are taken from the eighth edition of Gray's Manual (Fernald, 1950). TRE.ES (3 sub-forms). Woody plants greater than 20 ft tall. 1. Live deciduous trees. Living trees that lack leaves or needles during late fall, minter and early spring (e.g., Acer rubrum). 2. Live evergreen trees. Living trees that retain their leaves or needles throughout the year (e.g., Picea mariana). 3. Dead trees. Standing dead trees and tree stumps 5 ft or more in height. SHRUBS (6 sub-forms). Woody plants less than 20 ft tall. Woody plants taller than 20 ft at maturity (and commonly called trees) are considered shrubs when less than 20 ft tall. 4. Tall slender shrubs. Shrubs 10 to 20 ft tall, having usually one distinct trunk, and unbranched for 3 ft or more above the ground 5. Bushy shrubs. Non-aquatic shrubs 4 to 7 ft tall, having (e.g., Alnus rugosa). usually several stems, a bushy appearance and often branched from within 1 ft of the ground (e.g., Vaccinium corymbosum). TREES SHRUBS 40- 30. Ln 20. LIVE L IVE DEAD TALL BUSHY LOW LOW DECIDUOUS EVERGREEN IREES SLENDER SHRUBS SPARSE COMPACT AQUATIC DEAD. TREES TREES SHRUBS SHRUBS SHRUBS SHRUBS SHRUBS Figure 2. Sub-foxms of metiand trees and shrubs. EMERGENTS SURFACE SUBMERGENTS PLANTS N V. I 2- X V rA TALL SHORT MEADOW MEADOW ROBUST NARROW- EMERGENTS EMERGENTS EMERGENTS BROAD- SUB-SHRUBS LEAVED MARSH LEAVED FLOATING MARSH EMERGENT$ PLANTS EMERGE NTS FLOATING- LEAVED :PLANTS SUBMERGENrs Figure 3. Sub-foms of metland emergents, surface plants and s-abmergents. Low compact shrubs. Non-aquatic shrubs less than 4 ft tall, having usually several stems, very dense foliage, and often branched from within 6 in of the ground (e.g., Myrica gale). 7. Low sparse shrubs. Non-aquatic, simple o@r_sparsely branched shrubs up to 3 ft tall (e.g., Spiraea tomentosa). 8. Aquatic shrubs. Shrubs up to 7 ft tall, growing in standing water T'"In-or more deep (e.g., Cephalanthus occidentalis). 9. Dead shrubs. Standing dead shrubs and tree stumps.less than 5 ft tall. EIVIERQENTS (6 sub-forms). Rooted herbaceous or semi-woody plants that have the majority of their vegetative portion above the water surface. This includes herbaceous plants growing on moist, but exposed soil. 10. Sub-shrubs. Emergents up to 5 ft tall with herbaceous, arching stems; a persistent semi-woody base; and growing in water up to 18 in deep (e.g., Decodo verticillatus). 11. Robust emergents. Stout, erect emergents 5 to 10 ft tall which persist upright during the winter and into the second spring (e.g., Typha latifolia). 12. Tall meadow emergents. Grass-like emergents up to 6 ft tall, often forming dense stands; found on moist or seasonally flooded soil (e.g., Phalaris arundinacea). 13. Short meadow emergents. Sedge-like emergents less than 4 ft tall, some species forming tussocks; found on moist or seasonally flooded soil (e.g., Juncus effusus). 14. Narrow-leaved marsh emergents. Narrow-leaved emergents less than 5 ft tall, growing in water up to 18 in deep (e.g., Sparganium eurycarpum). T5. Broad-leaved marsh enmergents. Broad-leaved emergents less than 3 ft tall, growing in water up to 18 in deep (e.g., Pontederia cordata). SURFACE VEGETATION (2 sub-forms). Plants with vegetative parts principally on the water surface. 16. Floating-leaved vegetation. Rooted plants with leaves floating on the water surface (e.g., Nymphaea odorata). 17. Floating vegetation. Non-rooted plants that float freely on the water surface (e.g., Lemna minor). SUBIVIERGENTS (1 sub-form). Plants that lie beneath the water surface, except for flowering parts in some species. 18. Submergents. (e.g., Ceratophyllum demersum). i Wetland classes and subclasses. Wetland classes are synonymous with the foll6ving freshwater wetland types outlined by Martin et al (1953): open fresh vater, deep fresh marsh, shallow fresh marsh, fresh meadow, seasonally flooded basins and flats, shrub swamp, wooded swamp and bog. Seasonally flooded flats are restricted to river floodplains, whereas they also include upland basins in the Martin et al.(1953) system. A wetland subclass is one of two or more types of i.?etlands of the same class that differ signif- icantly in their wildlife value, chiefly because of differences in dominant sub-forms of vegetation. The subclasses below are those most common in 1iiassachusetts. Additional subclasses can be named simply by using a sub-form name to modify a class name; e.g., sub-shrub shallow marsh. -158- OPEN WATER (OW). This class applies to water 3 to 10 ft deep, associated uith any of the other metland classes, but usually with deep or shallol? marshes. Submergent and surface vegetation are dominant. Vegetated open vater (Ow-l). Surface vegetation is present. Sub- mergents that reach to within 6 in of the surface may be present. Non-vegetated open water (OW-2). Surface vegetation and near-surface submergents are absent. DEEP MARSH (DM). Thih,@class applies to wetlands with an average water depth between 6 in and 3 ft during the growing season. Emergent marsh vegeta- tion is usually dominant, with surface and submergent plants present in open areas. Dead woody_deep marsh (DM-1). Standing dead trees (sub-form #3), dead shrubs or stumps (1',19) are the most abundant form of cover. -ab s '8) are the dominant form of Shrub deep marsh (DM-2). Aq'uatic shr cover. If shrubs cover less than 50 percent of the area, the wetland is classified shrub deep marsh. It is classified shrub swamp (see below) if the shrub cover is 50 percent or greater. Sub-shrub deep marsh (DM-3). Decodon verticillatus (sub-form #10) is the dominant cover plant. Robust deep marsh (DM-4). Robust emergents (#11) are dominant. This is the classic deep marsh described as Type 4 by Martin et al.(1953). Narrow-leaved deep marsh (DIA-5). Narrow-leaved marsh emergents (#14) are dominant. Broad-leaved deep marsh (DM-6). Broad-leaved marsh emergents G45) are dominant. SHALLOW MARSH (SM). This class applies to wetlands dominated usually by robust or marsh emergents, with an average water depth less than 6 in during the growing season. Surface water may be absent during the late summer and abnormally dry periods. Floating-leaved plants (#10) and submergents V18) are often present in open areas. Robust shallow marsh (SM-1). Robust emergents (#11) are dominant. Narrow-leaved shallow marsh (SM-2). Narrov-leaved marsh emergents (1,14) are dominant. Broad-leaved shallow marsh (SM-3). Broad-leaved marsh emergents O#L15) are dominant. Floating-leaved shallow marsh (SM-4). Floating-leaved vegetation (#16) dominates. This is an unusual wetland type which occurs primarily on Cape Cod. It is classified shallow marsh since the average water depth is less than 6 in. Most of the surface 7.jater is f gone by late summer, leav- ing water lilies lying on exposed mud. Emergent plants occur only in sparse stands on the periphery... SEASONALLY FLOODED FLATS (SP). This class applies to extensive rive 'r flood- plains where flooding to a depth of 12 or more inches occurs annually during late fall, minter and spring. During the summer, the soil is ..saturated, with a few inches of surface iiater occurring locally. Dominant vegetation usually is emergent, but shrubs and scattered trees may be present. Seasonally flooded emergent flats (SF-1). Meadow emergents (#12, 13) '11) 15) occurring in dominate, with robust (j't ind marsh.emergents (#14, 7.ietter places, particularly along the streami. Bus',y (#5) and aquatic shrubs (-#8) are often found near the stream ar scattered across the -159- floodplain. This subclass resembles an ungrazed meadow (M-1, belov) exce.-ot for its greater sise, its floodplain locction and its generally deeper surface water during the spring. Seasonally flooded shrub flats (SF-2). Aquatic (#8) and bushy (#5) shrubs are dominant. Low sparse shrubs 04;@7) are sometimes abundant. Ground cover is largely sedges and grasses like those that dominate the previous subclass. Shrub flats are similar in appearance to bushy shrub swamps (SS-2) and aquatic shrub swamps (SS-4) except for their floodplain location and their generally deeper surface water during the spring. MEADOW (M). This class applies to wetlands dominated by meadow emergents (#12, 13), with up to 6 in of surface water during the late fall, winter and early spring. During the growing season the soil is saturated and the surface exposed, except in shallow depressions and drainage ditches. Meadows occur most commonly on agricultural land where periodic grazing or mowing keeps shrubs from becaning established. The structural differences in meadow vegetation often result frcm grazing; therefore, meadows have been divided into grazed and.ungrazed subclasses. Ungrazed meadom.(M-1).. The effects of grazing"are absent. By early summer, most ungrazed meadows support dense,, unbroken stands of tall t13) and broad-leaved meadow emergents (#12); short meadow emergents U herbs are often present, but rarely dominant. This subclass occurs in two major locations: on agricultural land and on the floodplains of small streams. In the latter site, the meadows resemble miniature seasonally flooded flats. Grazed meadow (M-2). Cover plants are greatly modified as a result of grazing. Certain plants such as Juncus effusus and Spiraea tomentosa persist while most of the grasses and sedges are sea7ectiveli remove d. SHRTJB-SWAMP (SS). This class applies to wetlands dominated by shrubs where the soil surface is seasonally or permanently flooded with as much as 12 in of water. Carex stricta is the characteristic ground cover beneath shrubs. Meadow R-12, 13) or marsh emergents (#14, 15) occupy open areas. Sapling shrub swamp (SS-1). Tall slender shrubs (#4) are dominant. The term "sapling" is used because the most common woody species in this subclass is Acer rubrum. Large Alnus rugosa, although technically not a sapling, i the secoiid nost ccim@on species. Bushy shrub swamp (SS-2). Bushy shrubs 0#5) are dominant. Compact shrub swamp (SS-3). Compact shrubs (#6) are dominant. Stands of Chamaedaphne calyculata are excluded because this species typically grows on peat, in bogs, rather than on mineral soil or muck, the charac- teristic substrate of swamps. Aquatic shrub swamp (SS-4). Aquatic shrubs (#8) are dominant. They shrub swamps contain surface water longer and of greater depth than cover more than 50 percent of the wetland area (cf. DM-2). Aquatic other shrub swamp subclasses. WOODED SWAMP (WS). This class applies to wetlands dominated by trees. The soil surface is seasonally flooded with up to 1 ft of water. Several levels of vegetation are usually present, including trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants. In mature wooded swamps, microtopography is very Pronounced. Trees and many shrubs gro@@i on iiell developed windthrow' mounds while marsh emergents and ferns occupy the vernal pools. -160- Deciduous -tviooded swamp (TATS-1). Deciduous trees (#1) are dominant. Evergreen wooded swamp (WS-2). Evergreen trees (#2) are dominant. Sphagnum often covers the ground in metter areas, but the soil is muck rather than peat. BOG(BG). This class applies to wetlands where the accumulation of Spha moss, as peat, determines the nature of the plant community. Young bogs commonly have floating peat mats which creep out-eard from shore over the surface of open water. Northern New England bogs-resemble those of the Boreal Forest region. Picea mariana and Larix laricina, are characteristic tree species. In southern New England boSs especially those in the coastal zone, Chamaecyparis thyoides is dominant. Chamaedaphne calyculata, Kalmia angustifolia, Sarracenia purpurea, and Eriophorum spp. are.,charac- teristic plants found in bogs throughout the northeast. A bog often can be divided into at least five zones (Molizuk'and Livingston, 1966): open vater, bog mat (Sphagnum and sedges), low shrubs, high shrubs and trees. In Massachusetts,-bogs dominated by low shrubs or by trees are most cormlon. Shrub bog (BG-1). Low, compact shrubs (-#16) are dominant. Wooded boE (BG-2). Evergreen trees (#2) are dominant. Acer rubrum is usually present, but seldom does it reach maximum size on the peat mat. Size categories. Wetlands in the glaciated northeast range from less than 1 acre to several thousand acres in size. The size categories devised apply ,to individual wetlands as typed on aerial photographs. In interpreting the influence of size..on a wetland's wildlife value, both the size and the juxtaposition of the vTetland vith others in a complex must be considered. The following size categories were devised for use in statewide or regional planning. In a more localized area, a 50-acre metland might be considered `large. Size categories: 1. Very Small -- less than 10 acres 2. Small -- 10-50 acres 3. Medium-sized -- 51-100 acres 4. Large -- 101-500 acres 5. Very Large -- greater than 500 acres Site types. Site type is a wetland descriptor based upon topographic and hydrologic location. Topographic location can be broadly categorized as either upland or bottomland@ Upland sites lie above alluvial or outwash plains, above stream valleys and floodplains. Most upland wetlands occur on bedrock, on till or on small pockets of outmash overlying till; the mater table is usually perched. Bottomland sites lie chiefly on the alluvium of stream floodplains, on outwash plains or on glacial lake deposits. Perched water tables may occur, but regional water tables are the rule. A vetland's hydrologic location may be lakeside, streamside, deltaic or isolated. To.be isolated, the -T.,7etland r!iust not border any larger body of ol)en water. Small streams may course through it, but the vetland is obviously not subordinate to the streams. Isolated wetlands usually owe th;eir wetness as much to groundwater seepage and surf ace runoff as to stream-flow. . . Streamside wetlands occur along a large stream and occupy part of all of its floodplain. A lakeside wetland occurs on the margin of a lake. A deltaic vetland lies at the point where a stream enters a lake. -161- Site types: 1. Upland isolated 2. Upland lakeside 3. Bottomland isolated 4. Bottomland lakeside 5i Bottomland streamside 6. Bottomland deltaic Cover types. The relative proportions of cover and open water and their degree of interspersion are two of the most vital features affecting wildlife value (Williams and Marshall, 1938; Meindall, 1958; Weller, 1964; Weller and Spatcher, 1965; McGilvrey, 1968). Collectively these features constitute the cover type, a term coined by.Stewart and Kantrud U971). In their system, "cover" refers to vhero each wetland usually consists of one wetland class stan,As of plants on the periphery of, or interspersed with,.areas of open i..iate@r. I have expanded their concept considerably to fit the no*rtheastern wetland which often consists of several wetland classes. In this system cover type is determined from aerial photographs with field checking. hrub swamp) as well as stands of individual plants. "Open water@' consists'of the class "Cover" can include entire metland classes (e.g., wooded swamp, s open water (OW) and the smaller open portions of marshes.and bogs. Stewart and Kantrud (1971) recognized four cover types; I have outlined eight. They'are diagrammed in Figure 4 and described below. Cover types: 1. Cover occupies more than 95 percent of the wetland area. 2. Cover occupies 76-95 percent of the wetland area, occurring in a peripheral band. 3. Cover occupies 76-95 percent of the wetland area, occurring in dense patches or diffuse, open stands. 4. Cover occupies 26-75 percent of the wetland area, occurring in a peripheral band. 5. Cover occupies 26-75 percent.of the wetland area, occurring n dense patches or diffuse, open stands. 6. Cover occupies 5-25 percent of the wetland area, occurring in a peripheral band. 7. Cover occupies 5-25 percent of the wetland area, occurring in patches or diffuse, open stands. 8. Cover occupies less than 5 percent of the wetlandarea. Vegetative interspersion types. Since most wildlife species require more than@one structural type of vegetation, their population density depends partly on the presence and length of certain kinds of edge. In this con- text', edge refers to the line of contact between two different sub-forms of vegetation. Whereas wildlife numbers are closely related to the total length of edge, wildlife diversity is.a function of the number of kinds of edge. Small sub-form stands have more edge per unit of area than larger stands. For wetland evaluation, I recommend a minimum size of 1 acre for r like@those that flank streams, are extremely significan"t to wildlife, these ecognition of a sub-form stand. Since long, narrow strips of vegetation, should be considered during evaluation, even though the total area of such a strip might be far less than 1 acre. -162- Figure 4. Wetlana cover types. White areas indicate water (with or without surface plants); black areas indicate emergents, shrubs or trees. @1;,jl A06 COVE R TYPE I COVE R T Y P E2 COVE R TYPE 3 COVER TYPE 4 Jill jo Iwo COVER TYPE 5 COVER TYPE 6 Aff COVER TYPE 7 COVER TYPE 8 Vigt!�6 5-illustrates three -wetlands which contain the same number of life PQimisl(thtee) and sub-forms (six), but which represent different vegetative inters"pe-r-sision types. The number of kinds of edge associated with each type 18 JupA an example; it is not the characteristic number for that type. V6getative interspersion types: 1. Low Interspersion -- Length and types of edge are at a minimum, The wetland consists of concentric life form and sub-form zones or a single sub-form. Sub-form stands are.large and unbroken. 2. Moderate Interspersion -- Edge is moderate in length and diver@ity. Ther(.! is same'irregularity in the distribu- tion of sub-form stands, but life form zones remain largely intact. High Interspersion -- Edge is abundant and consists of many kinds. Life form zones are broken into segments of variable size and shape. Sub-form stands are small and scattered. Surrounding habitat types. The nature of the surrounding habitat is a key feature determining a wetland's mildlife value. Waterfowl and most other wetland wildlife depend upon suitable surroundings for food and nest sites. The surrounding habitat types also determine what upland species are likely to us6 the wetland. Furthermore, intense human activity adjacent to a met- land dan deter many species from utilizing the metland. Surrounding "natural" habitat may serve as a buffer, reducing disturbance of wildlife and satisfying some 6P their requirements. The broad surrounding habitat types below were addpt6d tram a land use cover-typing system developed by iviacConnell and Pywell (1969): 1. Agricultural or Open Land 2. Forest Land 3. Salt Marshes 4. Mining or Waste Disposal Areas 5. Urban Land 6. Outdoor Recreation Facilities Additional descriptive components. The components described so far represent the most important ecological features determining a uetland's mildlife value. Two other components, wetland juxtaposition and water chemistry, are useful in metland evaluation (see next section) but are not employed in classifica- ti6h. Criteria for Wetland Evaluation Once a. vtetland has been classified, evaluation is straightforward. Table 1 dontains ten criteria and a relatively simple rating system. Each criterion has specifications describing three or more possible categories into which a given wetland might be placed. Specifications have been assigned ranks, ranging from 3 (highest value) to 1 (lowest value). During evaluation a v6tl&n,d receives a rank for each of the ten criteria. If, for any criterion, more @,hah one specification seems to fit the wetland, the ranks for those specifications are averaged. Since scme criteria are more important than others, each has been given a fixed numerical value, called a significance coefficient, ranging from 5 (most important criteria) to 1 (least important -164- INTERSPERSION TYPE 1 INTERSPERSION TYPE 2 INTERSPERSION TY P E 3 DECIDUOUS TREES TALL MEADOW EMtRGENTS TALL SLENDER SHRUBS ROBUST EMERGENTS GENTS BUSHY SHRUBS BROAD-LEAVED EMER Figure 5. Examples of the three vetland vegetative interspersion types., Type 1 -- minianum length of edge, large units and few types of edge (five in this example).. Type 2 -- moderate length of edge, medium-large units and moderate number of types of edge (seven in this examiple). Type 3 -- great length of edge, small units and many types of edge (eleven in this example). -165- Table 1. Wildlife criteria, significance coefficients, specifications and ranks. Rank (3-0) (2-5) (2.0) (1-5) (1.0) Criteri4. Specifications Wetland Cless 5 or more 4 classes 3 classes 2 classes 1 class Richness (5)l classes Lominant Wet- SF, DM SM WS, Ss OW, BG M land Class (5) Size Category (5) over 500 acres 101-500 acres 51-100 acres 10-50 acres under 10 acres Subclass 10 or more 6-9 4-5 2-3 Richness (4) subclasses subclasses subclasses. subclasses subelabs Site Type (4) bottomland - bottomland.- upland lakeside isolated isolated bottomland - b e;6;6 ea!lftnd deltaic lakeside bottomland - streamsiae 1Number in parentheses after each criterion is its significance coefficient. Table 1. (Continued) Rank (3-0) (2-5) (2.0) (1-5) (1.0) Criteria Specifications Wetland Juxta- Hydrologically Hydrologically All position (2) connected to connected to other wetlands other wetlands (different dom. (different dam. class) or open class) or open 'ttiater bodies water bodies within 1 mile. from 1-3 miles (or) - away. Hydrologically (or) other connected to Hydrologically other wetlands connected to (same dom. other wetlands class) within (same dom. 1/.4 mile. class) from 1/4- .(or) 1 mile away. Wetland greater (or) possibilities than 500 acres, Within 1/2 mile with three or of other wetlands more wetland (different dom. classes (includ- class) or open ing DIM or. SM)'. water bodies, but not hydrologically connected. ow. 4M low an on M AM 'M On OW an' an go as 'M M, as as Table 1. (Continued) Rarll-.-. 0-0) (2-5) (2.0) (1-5) (1.0) Criteria Specifications Surrounding 2 or more of 1 or more of foi- 1 or.more of Habitat following con- lowing constitute following con- Types (4) ttitute more 50-90% of surrounding stitute less than 9(#o of habitat: than 50% of surrounding 1. forestland surrounding habitat: 2. agricultural or habitat: 1. forestland open land 1. forestland 2. agricultural 3. salt marsh 2. agricultural or open land (or) or open land salt marsh I of preceding con- 3. salt marsh stitutes more than 94, of surrounding habitat. Cover Type (3) Type 5 Type 4 Type 3 Type 1 Type 8 Type 7 Type 2 Type 6 Vegetative Interspersion Type (3) Type 3 Type 2 Type I Table 1. (Continued.) Rank (3.0) (2.5) (2.0) (1-5) (1.0) Criteria Specifications Water ChEMistry (1) Total Alkalinity Total Alkalinity Total Alkalinity greater than 69 23-69 ppm CaCO3 less than 23 ppm CaCO ppm CaCO 3' 3' pH greater than 7.5 pH 6.5-7.5 pH less than 6.5 GIN criterion). A sub-score is calculated for each criterion by multiplying the significance coefficient for that criterion by the rank given. Scores for all criteria are summed and a total wetland score is obtained. This final'score represents, in simple quantitative fashion, the wetland's relative wildlife value. Table 2 illustrates the scoring procedure for an imaginary wetland. Table,2. Wetland scoring (ranks are based on fictitious data). Significance Criterion Coefficient Rank Subscore 1. Class Richness 5 2.0 10.0 2. Dominant Class 5 3.0 15.0 3. Size 5 2.5 12.5 Subclass Richness 4 2.5 10.0 5. Site Type 4 2.0 8.0 6. Surrounding Habitat 4 3.0 12.0 7. Cover Type 3 2.0 6.0 8. Veg. Interspersion 3 1.0 3.0 9. Juxtaposition 2 2.0 4.o 10. Water Chemistry 1 3.0 3.0 Total Wetland Score 83.5 The lowest possible total score is 36 and the highest is 108. This implies, and rightly so, that even the least valuable wetland has some wildlife value. For some criteria there are five categories of specifications and five corre- sponding ranks (3-0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5 and 1.0). For other criteria, where our knowledge or measurement ability is less refined, only three categories of specifications and ranks (3.0, 2.0, 1.0) are recognized. A brief description of each of the criteria follows. 1. Wetland class richness. This criterion describes the number of wetland classes present in a wetland, where 5 acres is the minimum area recognizable as a separate class. As class richness increases, so does the likelihood for greater wildlife species richness. Wetland class richness is the broadest and single most important criterion for evaluation. 2. Dominant wetland class. Some wetland classes have greater value than others for wildlife diversity and production, and certain classes provide the only suitable habitat for some species highly valued by man (e.g., water- fowl). Dominant life form of vegetation, water depth and permanence of , surface water are the major characteristics considered in ranking classes (see Table 1). The dominant class is the one that clearly occupies the greatest area. If two or more classes are co-dominant, the ranks are averaged. -170- 3. Size categories. Wetlands are ranked frcm largest to smallest, according to the general principle that as size increases, so does wildlife value. Greater size usually results in greater insulation from human disturbance, greater habitat diversity and greater metland longevity. In addition, wet- lands larger than .100 acres are of great value to flocks of migrating water- fowl. 4. Subclass richness. This variable goes one step further than wetland class richness in assessing habitat diversity. Just as particular life forms characterize classes, particular.sub-forms characterize subclasses. A met- land's broad wildlife value increases as the number of subclasses increases. As noted above, a wetland segment must be at least 1 acre in size to be recognized as a separate subclass. 5. Site type. Bottomland wetlands are generally more valuable than upland wetlands because of greater soil fertility, more sustained surface water levels and greater life expectancy. Similarly, wetlands associated with open water bodies are usually more valuable than isolated ones.' Using this rationale I grouped site types into three categories for. evaluation (see Table 1). 6. :,Surrounding habitat types. Freshwater wetlands bordered by forest, agricultural or open landi or salt marsh are more valuable to wildlife than those adjacent to land more intensively developed by man. Furthermore, diversity in the surrounding habitat increases the possibility of wildlife diversity within the wetland. The percentage of the surrounding habitat types present determine, the rank given for this criterion. 7. Cover type. This variable can be assessed in vetlands consisting of one or many metland classes, although its value is most evident in evaluating deen and shallow marshes. Studies (Weller and Spatcher, 1965; McGilvrey, 1968) suggest that a cover-water ratio of approximately 50:50 is optimal for waterfoml and marsh birds in general. Highest ranks are thus given to wet- lands with nearly equal proportions of cover and water. Areas with nearly total cover or total open water receive low ranks. In addition, cover inter- spersed with water is deemed more valuable than a band of cover surrounding open water. 8. Vegetative interspersion. A wetland receives a rank for this criterion according to which interspersion type (Figure 5) it approximates. High ranks are associated with an abundance of edge between sub-form stands, small size of such stands and a large number of different kinds of edge. 9. Wetland_juxtaposition. A metland's value is generally higher if it is located near other wetlands, expecially if the adjacent wetlands contain classes or subclasses different from those of the-metland being evaluated. Moreover, the value increases if these wetlands are interconnected by streams. In such cases, wildlife (especially waterfoml) can move safely between wet- lands to best meet their habitat requirements. The ranking of specifications listed in Table 1 reflects these considerations. _171- 10. Water chemistry. Water chemistry influences the presence, abundance and distribution of aquatic plants and invertebrates (Juday, 1942; Moyle, 1945, 1946;@Jahn and Hunt, 1964). Decision-makers have no time to adequately sample and describe wildlife food plants and animals, but water chemistry - determinations can serve as indices of potential productivity. Brooks and Deevey (1963) pointed out that New England surface waters are very dilute and extremely soft for the most part. Analysis of water chemistry data provided by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Game produced support for this generalization. These data suggest that average total alkalinity in excess of 70 PPm CaC03 and pH values above 7.5 can be considered high. Specifications for pH (Tdble 1) are basedupon clear-cut groupings of th 'e- graphed data for 95 ponds and lakes. Alkalinity specifications derive from classes of Brooks and Deevey (1963). Total alkalinity is the better index of productivity; pH is less reliable, and should only be used if alkalinity data a.re not obtainable. Discussion This system of wetland classification and evaluation allows one to objectively group-wetlands-according to their -wildlife value and to identify key areas for preservation and acquisition. Use of the system assumes, however, .acceptance of the stated standard for evaluation: maximum wildlife prbduc- .tion 'and diversity. The above criteria would not be suitable for use by a state fish and game agency attempting to identify valuable wood duck (Aix sponsa) production areas. For that case, more specialized criteria would be required. Two major constraints guided the development of this system. First 'it 'was designed for use by decision-makers. A special.effort was made to produce criteria that are as uncomplicated and objective, and yet as sensitive, as possible. The necessary data for most of the evaluation can be obtained, from recent aerial photographs, topographic maps and surficial geology maps. Wetland subclass, vegetative interspersion and water chemistry are key descriptors which require unavoidable, but limited, field work. Shortage of ti,me and expertise 'would render a more sophisticated system useless to the decision-maker. The choice to consider virtually all wildlife species during evaluation impos 'ed another major constraint. Although wildlife production and diversity are both reasonable goals, they are not strictly-compatible. It is impossible to maximize the production of all species at once, since each has a different set of habitat requirements. The broadness of the criteria reflect the over- riding influence of compromise. Certain wetlands possess characteristics that render them unique or of out- standing value. For example, a wetland might support the only nesting colony Such a wetland merits preservation, even though it might not score highly of black-crovned night herons (!Tycticorax nycticorax) in an entire state. by this system. Clearly, some subjective decisions must be made. _172- Similarly, after a wetland has been scored :by @his sysuem, other subjective considerations are in order. What human impacts are.operating on the w6tland, and to what extent do these depress the total score? In some cases, proper control of land use practices can raise significantly a wetland's wildlife value. Secondly, what is the Wetland's potential for enhancement via habitat manipulation? Two wetlands with identical scores might be differentiated according to their potential for enhancement.. This potential depends on such factors as topographic and hydrologic location. Above all, the value of any metland must be vieved in its proper context. The absolute value of a score is meaningless; the score has meaning only in relation to the scores of other wetlands. All wetlands in Amherst, Massachu- setts might be evaluated and their scores compared. The "average" score would undoubtedly vary from the "average" score in Worcester or Provincetown since wetland characteristics are greatly influenced by physiography and'. . land use. Any attempt at the use of cut-off scores in decision-making must be sensitive to the importance of the scale of reference. Literature Cited Beaumont, A. B. 1956. The soils of Massachusetts. Univ. Massachusetts Ext. Serv. Spec. Circ. No. 64. Amherst, Mass. 32 pp. Brooks, J. L. and E. S. Deevey, Jr. 1963. New England. Pp.'117-162. In Prey, D. G. (Ed.), Limnology in North America. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wis. 734 pp. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th ed. American Book Co., N.Y. 1632 pp. Golet, F.,C. 1972. Classification and evaluation of freshwater wetlands as wildlife habitat in the glaciated Northeast. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. xv+ 179 Pp. and J. S. Larson. 1974. Classification of freshwater wetlands in the glaciated Northeast. U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Resource Pub. i\To. 116. Washington, D.C. 56 pp@@ Jahn, L. R. and R. A. Hunt. 1964. Duck and coot ecology and management-in Wisconsin. Wis. Conserv. Dept. Bull. No. 33. Madiso'n., Wis. 212 pp. Juday, C. 1942. The sumer standing crop of plants and'animals in four Wisconsin lakes. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters-34:103-135. Larson, J. S. 1971. Progress toward a decision-making model for public management of freshwater 7,,ietlands. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. and Nat. Resources Conf. 36:376-382. MacConnell, W. P. and L. E. Garvin. 1956. Cover mapping a state from aerial photographs. Photogranmetric Engineering 22(4):702-707. -173- MacConnel I W. P. and H. R. Priell. 1969. Use of aerial photographs to evaluate the recreational resources of the Connecticut River in Coraiec- tidut. Univ. Massachusetts Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 574. Amhersty Ma s s - 73 PP Viartin!, A. C., N. Hotchkiss, F. M. Uhler and W. S. Bourn. 1953. Classific a- tiQn of wetlands of the United States. U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv.L Sp ec. 5ci. Rept. No. 20. Washington, D. C. 14 pp. McGilv:iey, F. B. (Ed.) 1968. A guide to wood duck production habitat require- uk"_Xlts. U. S.' Fish and Wildl. Serv. Resource Pub. No. 60. Washington,. D.C. 32 pp. Mendall, H. L. 1958. The ring-necked duck in the Northeast. Univ. Maine Bull. 6o(16). 320 pp. 1-:@`oizuk, G. A. and R. B. Livingston. 1966. Ecology of red maple in a Massa- chusetts upland bog. Ecol. 47(6):942-950. NlottS3 W. S. and M. Sain&s: 1969. The occurrence and characteristics of ground-water contamination in Massachusetts. Univ. Iviessachusetts Water Resources-Research Center Pub. No. 7. Amherst, Mass. 70 pp. Moyle, J. B. 1945. Some chemical factors influencing the distribution of aquatic plants in Minnesota. Ani. Midland Naturalist 34(2):402-420. 1946. Some indices of lake productivity. Trans. Am. Fisheries Sop. --- 76:322-334. Office' of River Basin Studies. 1954. Wetlands inventory of Massachusetts. U S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Boston, Mass. 14 pp.+ appendices. Sham, S. P. and G. C. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. qirc. No. 39. Washington, D.C. 67 PP. Stewart' R. E. and H. A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Resources Pub. No. 92. Washington, D. C. 57 PP. Weller, M. W. 1964. Ecology. In Delacour, J. (Ed.), The waterfowl of the World. Country Life, Ltd., London. Vol. 4.364 pp. and C.,S.. Spatcher. 1965. Role of habitat in the distribution and abundance of marsh birds. Iowa Agr. and Home Econ. Exp. Sta. Spec. Rtpt. No. 43. Iowa State Univ. of Sci. and Tech., Ames, Iowa. 31 PP. Williams, C. S. and W. H. Marshall. 1938. Evaluation of nesting cover for waterfowl on Bear River Refuge. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 3:64o-646. -174- ag Ab Irv 4, 4L 03511-A vq -Tit IL It, WESTERN SHORE STUDY AREA -7 Scale 7i Md. G ...I STUDY AREA The Upland Natural Area Study is confined to the Maryland counties bordering the.Western Shore of the Chesapeake Bay, the Potomac River up to the District of Columbia, and Cecil County. The inland boundary of the study essentially follows a line corresponding to Interstate 95. The study is therefore limited to areas lying within Maryland!s Coastal Plain. Maryland's Coastal Plain falls within the northern embayed portion of the Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province. This embayed portion of the Coastal Plain is characterized primarily bythe presence of drowned river systems and barr ier beaches (ocean coast). The Bay itself represents the drowned portion of the Susquehanna River and its tributaries. The rolling uplands of the Western Shore Coastal Plain are generally bounded by deep stream valleys. These uplands are underlain by a series of southeasterly dipping layers of relatively unconsolidated sand, clay and gravel. These sediments range in age from early Cretaceous to Holocene and represent deposition in a variety of marine environments. Fossils are abundant in many of these formations particularly in the Calvert Cliffs area. (The first fossil to be described in North America came from these formations.) Nine major soil associations occur in the study area. Because of the nature of the parent material these soils are usually sandy,and often have significant amounts of silt and clay mixed in. Medium to moderately course textured soils predominate throughout the Western Shore. Of note are the Beltsville soils which cover much of-Southern Maryland. These soils axe characterized by a deep,compact fragipan lying below the soil surface. This layer inhibits both water movement and root penetration often causing the vegetation in these areas to represent types associated with arid regions. Othello soils, found throughout the Coastal Plain, develop on the fine silts of lowlands deposits and, therefore, are generally found in level, flat areas bordering the Bay and its tributaries. Mixed hardwood forests originally covered most of the Western Shore uplands. These forests are characterized by oaks, hickories, maples, beech and gum. Dogwood, sassafras and holly are characteristic understory species. Because of intensive agricultural practices and logging, few remnants of Maryland's original forests remain. Typical forest-stands today are second and third growth stands. This extensive clearing also accounts for the increase in the percent of pine forests through out the region. The pines represent an early successional stage which is often maintained because of continued disturbance. Typical pine species include Scrub Pine (Pinus virginiana) and Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) (Shreve, et al, 1910). Two vegetation associations can be considered lowland areas, the Gum-Pine association and river swamps. The Gum-Pine association is characterized by Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and Loblolly pines along with red maples and several oaks. The river swamps occur along the flood plain of the rivers. The best example of this vegetative community is Zekiah swamp running along the Wicomico River in Charles County. The dominant trees of this association are Sweet Gum, River Birch, and Swamp Oaks. Southern Maryland lies just within the range of the Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum) which is represented in a large swamp in Southern Calvert County (Shreve, et al, 1910). Extensive marshes are found bordering the rivers of Maryland. These grade-from typical salt marshes in the lower stream reaches to fresh marshes further upstream and in the northern portions of the Bay. These marshes play an important role in buffering the stream banks from the waves washing against the shore as well as trapping sediments washed from the uplands. Typical species range from Spartina, Scirpus and Juncus for salt marshes to Typha, Potamogeten, and Numphaea in fresh marshes. -179- Aquatic Buffer Zone Owing to its importance to the Coastal Zone Management Program, various aspects of the aquatic buffer zone are extensively detailed be- low. in recent decades, the degradation and loss of aquatic systems has underscored the need for sound ecological management of streams, ponds and wetland. Increased public awareness of the relationship of land use, water quality, and aquatic life led to the enactment of the Coastal Zone Manage- ment Act of 1972 as well as to passage of the 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Quality Act. Such legislation provides the potential for environmental protection through responsible State action. As mandated in Section 205 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, states are required to delineate areas of particular concern and indicate permissible land uses. Sites with rare or otherwise important species and physical features are candidates for designation as areas of concern. Within all sites containing water courses or water bodies, a critical zone of land exists between the water and the neighboring upland. This' zone is of particular concern because it is both fragile and, under nat- ural conditions, acts as a buffer to the,aquatic system. Throughout the coastal zone, buffers play a variety of roles. They are of primary impor- tance in protecting aquatic systems against impacts accompany agriculture and development, which include sediment, toxic chemicals such as herbicides and pesticides, fertilizers, nutrients, oils and bacteria. In addition, this zone detains runoff and controls erosion on streamside slopes. These vegetated buffers provide a visually diversified landscape and contribute to environmental quality by providing wildlife shelter, nesting sites and food. The present land use pattern of the Eastern Shore contains many lush stream side forests of sufficient width to serve important protective func- tions with respects to aquatic biota. The natural vegetation in these buffer zones maintains the health of the aquatic system by (1) maintaining a balanced nutrient regime, (2) moderating water temperatures by shade, (3) providing aquatic organisms with food sources, (4) reducing the scouring of stream bottoms and (5) preventing sedimentation through con- trol of runoff and erosion. Thus, when retained in a natural condition, buffer zones serve as maintenance-free "public works projects". once destroyed, these amenities and their services are lost and are difficult, if not impossible, to replace at reasonable cost. Functionally equiva- lent benefits can only be attained by public expenditures for water fil- tration, dredging, recurrent stocking of streams with fish, flood control- programs and the creation of artificial wildlife habitats. Natural amenities are irreplaceable. -180- The following discussion outlines the key features considered in the identification of aquatic buffers and in ascertaining adequate buffer widtq@s under varying conditions. First is described the key physical pro- cesses which occur along water bodies and watercourses, these are then re- lateqd to appropriate buffer widths. A discussion of possible compatible uses is included. This discussion is detailed to provide decision makers with a thorough understanding of the processes and considerations involved in determining adequate widths for aquatic buffer zones. Runoff When rain strikes the ground it can dislodge soil particles and trans- port,this sediment, as well as any oil residues, pesticides, fertilizers, to watercourses. In general, it is the properties of the soil which deter- mine whether the rain will infiltrate into the ground or move overland as runoff to the aquatic system. If the rate of rainfall is greater than the capacity of the soil to absorb it, or if the soil is already saturated, the unabsorbed excess becomes overland flow, and the water and its contents can reach the aquatic system. If the precipitation is absorbed by the soil it may move toward the sur- facewater system by a variety of pathways. If the soil is deep and of fairly uniform permeability, the subsurface water moves downward to the zone of saturation and then flows within the soil to the nearest watercourses. (Dunne, 1974). OVERLAND Figure 2 Soils or rocks with varying properties may compl qicate this simple pattern (Davis and Dewiest, 1966). Generally, ground water flows slowly, and the unde rground paths of flow are long. Therefore, most underground flow con- tributes only to the streamisaseflow, the basic stream flow to which storm water is an addition. If percolating water encounters an impeding horizon (claypan or fragi- pan),in the subsoil, at some shallow depth part of the water will be diverted horizontally over the impeding layer and will reach the watercourses sooner by a shorter path. This diversion through the soil, often along the impeding surface, is called sub-surface flow, and is one form of the general ground flow. (June, 1974). Where water follows this shorter path or where steeper slope gradients occur, water may reach the stream channel more quickly than by typical ground- water flow and may contribute to the storm peak-flow of the stream (Weyman, 1970:, Ragan, 1968). On some slopes, sub-surface flow may intersect the ground -181- surface and emerge as a spring or seep. The water then traverses the sur- face of a saturated area as return flow (Dunne, 1974). Figure 3 @Ub-6URFACE:, RETURN, kND 6ATURATED OVERLAND 6kTU I?ATEP FLOW!b KLMD FL6W .......... FIZA6 I F \0 :"i:::31Mj1P 5A-ruR A -r i ot4 OF 0 _K, Rain falling directly onto saturated soils near streams cannot infil- trate into the wet soil, but runs over the surface to the stream channel.' This is termed saturated overland flow. It is impossible to separate sa- turated overland flow from return flow and the two together are usually considered saturated overland flow (Dunne, 1974). Partial Areas The occurrence of each water flow process is a function of geology, physiography, soil properties, vegetation and land use in a particular region. Recent studies of undeveloped watersheds in the eastern United States and in England have shown that a saturated area adjacent to streams contributes the greatest runoff volume during storms. A number of inves- tigations (Table 3) support the idea that most overland flow occurs from areas that make up no more than 107., and usually only 1-17. of a drainage basin (Dunne and Black, 1971). Betson (1964) first discussed these areas when he realized that only partialareas of entire basins in the Tennessee Valley could be contributing runoff to storm flow. Hence, he coined the term "partial area" for these saturated, often shallow, stony, or compacted areas. This modifies the classic theory of Horton (1933) which implies that most rainfall events exceed the infiltration capacity of the soil and that overland flow is commonly widespread in area. Partial areas are dynamic, expanding and contracting seasonally and with variations in storm duration and intensity, When expanded during storms, the outer edge of these areas can be considered the outer edge of the functional aquatic system. Under dry conditions the areas contract. In general, partial areas parallel the water's edge, but their shape and size is dependent on local geology, soils, relief, vegetation and land use. At a minimum, partial areas are critical to the protection of aquatic systems. They are the natural zone of overland flow and are highly erodible. Table 3. PROPONENTS OF PARTIAL AREA THEORY S.E. Forest Exp. S.E.F.E.S. Postulate West Virginia Station, 1962 Betson, 1964 Tennessee Valley Postulate Tennessee Authority Ragan, 1968 U.S. Forest Ser- Field Study Vermont vice Dunne and Black, McGill & Cornell Field Study Vermont 1971 Universities Chiang, 1971 D.E.P. Penn. Computer Model Pennsylvania (Pers. comm.) Hills, 1971 Bristol Univ. Field Study England Freeze, 1972a,b IBM, Thomas Computer Model New York Watson Research (sub-surface Center runoff) Grubr.uck and U.S.D.A. Water- Field Study Pennsylvania Heald,, 1974 shed Research (Phosphate Center transport) -183- 0 Soils are a good indicator of where partial areas are located. Chiang, (1971) has recognized that certain physical soil properties help identify the relative runoff potentials of different soils. Chiang's method of classi- fication is an expansion of the Soil Conservation Service's Hydrologic Soils Groups, as well as a reclassification of certain soil series (Table 4). Table 4. RUNOFF POTENTIAL RATING TABLE (Chiang, 1971) 11 TTT TV V Vi Vii Well Drained Moderately Somewhat Poorly Very moderately well drained poorly crained poorly shallow deep deep drained drained (181.) (18"-36") (36") 1. Medium texture C or (-FD)*** +C B or (+Bq)** +C C +D D or mixture of coarse to fine texture 2. Coarse texture +C or (+I))*** B +11 or (A) B +C -D D (B)* 3. Fine texture C or (D)*** C +C or (B)** C C D D 4. Medium textured +C B +B + C C -D D soil on vertically fractured rock 5. Coarse textured qB + B A B + C + D D soil on vertically fractured rock Revised rating for well-drained soils: if fraqgipans or clay pans exist in deep soils if tqhe soil is deeper than 10 ft. and ex- cessively well drained if the soil is less than 9" deep qlqoq/q. 0 This system recognizes that shallow soils over impermeable bedrock, as well as deep soils with shallow fragipans or clay lenses, may quickly become sa- turated, generating runoff. This is supported by other recent studies (Hewlett and Hibbert, 1967; Hewlett and Nutter, 1970; Whipkey, 1965). Soils classified byhiang as D and D2q+ have high runoff potentials and are roughly equivalent to partial areas (Chiang, 1974, pers. comm.). Where these soils existin juxtaposition to aquatic systems, they should be considered the outer boundaries of the aquatic system. In addition, C and C2q+ soils may be- come sIaturated seasonally or during storms, and generate runoff. Although these soils generate runoff less frequently, they may be included as part of the buffer zone. Several processes combine to reduce the infiltration capacity of the soil during a storm. When soils are cleared of vegetation, the filling of fine pores with water reduces capillary forces drawing water into the soil and the storage potential of the soil is more quickly reached. If clay is present in the soil, the clay particles swell as they become wet, reducing soil pore size. The impact of the raindrops, the major cause of erosion, (Young and Weirs8qma, 1973) breaks up soil aggregates, splashing fine particles over the surface and washing them into pores where they impede infiltration. At the beginning of a storm, percolation generally exceeds rainfall intensity and there is little accumulation of water on the soil surface. As either the in- tensity increases or the infiltration rate is decreased by saturation, rain- fall exceeds infiltration capacity. At first, this excess rainfall fills surface depressions. When the depressions become filled the excess becomes overland flow traversing the land in a system of rills (Emmett, 1970). Slope Another consideration in the protection of aquatic systems from excess runoff and siltation is the slope of the adjacent land. On slopes greater than qiqO percent the slope of surface depressions is too steep to permit a significant retention of water and silt (Leopold, 1968). In fact, depending on the pattern of land management or the type of soil, surface depressions may be absent. Where denuded slopes of greater than 10 percent occur next to aquatic systems, particularly with soils having high erosion potentials, they Pose a significant hazard to the aquatic system. In developing water- sheds, where the soils are denuded of vegetation, the sediment yields in streams can be increased to 100 times their natural rates (Wolman., 1964). Slopes greater than 10 percent must be carefully managed, particularly along,streams, and should be kept covered with vegetation. They should be considered. as part of the buffer zone depending on their proximity to the aquatic system. Urbanization In an urbanizing watershed, the path of surface water flow is largely determined by sewers, roads, rooftops and other impervious surfaces and by land uses. The two factors governing the stream flow regime are the per- centage of the watershed area made impervious and the rate at which the water is transmitted to stream channels. The former is governed by the type of land use, the latter by the density, size and characteristics of tribu- tary channels and storm sewers (Leopold, 1968). Impervious surfaces in up- lands which are connected to aquatic systems by sewers are, in effect, man- made partial areas. Alternative methods for infiltrating water on site, such as pervious pavement and rooftop or other types of detention ponds, should be given serious consideration over shunting water directly to aquatic systems via sewers. Surfaces such as lawns, pastures and trails are usually compacted and may act as impervious surface. In intense storms surfaces such as lawns become matted and runoff occurs in sheets and rills. When next to aquatic systems, they do not provide the impediment to runoff necessary for the system's protection. Vegetation undergoing natural succession is much more effective in detaining and retaining runoff. Vegetation Vegetation protects the soil from raindrop impact, traps sediment, and impedes overland flow. At the same time, root systems, particularly in partial areas, absorb significant volumes of soil water during the grow- ing season, thereby potentially increasing the infiltration capacity of streamside soils. The foliage and roots of streamside trees such as blackgum, willow, red maple and beech are substantially more efficient than other plants at removing water from the soil (Fowells, 1965; Lee, 1942). Trees also pro- vide litter and humus which absorb and store water. Roots which penetrate deep into the ground aerate the soil, maintaining its porosity and granular structure (Buckman and Brady, 1974). Shade from a floodplain or streamside forest moderates temperatures in the stream, thus buffering aquatic organisms 136 AQUATIC BUFFERS Figure 8 j7zoge5T CAKsOPY, :5H P.00, AND CANOPY E-VAPO-`TlZAPSetF;-'0S H,EAB L-AYER-5 INTE-ACEEP7 "IPFALL- I LI-rTE R AND 4UMUS FOKE-5-F -r", + 'zs4A0F- MOOF-AATE-=. STIZaA ABi@oil!46 w A m PROTECT 501 , D TM-MpE-P-ATUFLE=- FLUCTUATIONS. FeE-0 -5o'L- lis 5@ vli IcH LEAVaS 6Eco(.JE F@oop POLIO P04ZO05 SOIL .1 Klc--STIN6 MA-rE-17-IAI- Foe @S-Tgkjc- Uav 5TPL5=AM 0AGP@r"'SMS- gOC,r MAT flZOV I PJES 6 U LAIR -Tt:,@, TI-V SOIL- STIZvc-TL)9@s AND 401-t-n-5 SOIL FILT A-rfON A"D PRoMo-rE i S@t@,u E35/-rRICKE7S, AND @VE-93 L-A'YC'@ P^iNFA@LL AND Pe5lS-r rZ -TP 1(-!KC-T L I TT r--a HUI-lU5 AeSOIZO VjAll-- AN P IMPeDI2- WIATEIZ NIEL@17(- C-0 \/2 K 9.OOT MAT PIZOMOTeS GR.AMUL-AIZ SOIL@ 5TR(-)CTL)12C-) I+OLDW4 SC)lf- LL 14E" LA-,ree- ^jAT0:e VaLoc-iTY FILTC-1:2S -5eDimr-wr AIJD NUTP-101@, LL AND 12@E51ST5 EIZOSIC311J. 0 0 LP F MAT @+O@-DS 50(L) AS'509-,L@13 KLM-IOPF, AtiD fp@oMoTfE@s rIZAIk-3L)LA9 SOIL- STRUCTUP-e. z LU -ru P -TE LAV\/NJ AKP cz@!-P&5 -F F:1 L -125 5iE--0im C-NT AND WA-rEIZ \J97-LC)C-17-Y. PAG-T UP, E <@i@j-IPA<--rizl) 5L)PF-,-kcF=- I F+,[email protected] P-.0"OF-F -roPF MA-r 5,OtL NUTIZIENT -r9-j",NSP09T 5AFE 5 01 L- N UTP-1 E-tJ T AQUATIC 14At3ITAT5 69F Ve5T97YP@@ -187- from temperature extremes. Leaf material also serves as a significant source of food and nutrient for aquatic flora and fauna (Vannote, 1975). If vege- tation is removed and more sunlight allowed to penetrate the water surface, diurnal temperature fluctuations may exceed the tolerance of aquatic fauna during one or.all of the life phases (Auberton and Patrick, 1965), meanwhile, the food necessary for certain organisms may be eliminated by tree removal (Vannote, 1975). Biological Contamination The soil is a rich medium for culturing both pathenogenic and non-path- enogenic bacteria. The nutrient rich, moist soils of partial areas,are es- pecially important in this respect. Bacteria and viruses move through the soil with ground water flow. The movement of the pollution in the soil is connected with and dependent upon the rise and fall of the ground water table and the alternation of wet and dry weather conditions (Stiles and Crohurst, 1923). The soil between the highest water table level and one foot below the lowest water table level is called the bacterial danger zone (Stiles and Crohurst, 1923). Here the conditions are ideal for bacterial growth. Par- tial areas often have a seasonal high water table at or near the surface, therefore, the bacterial danger zone is at or near the surface in these areas. 4qBAqCrqe @Z I A A qQ D V I RU-S RICW 5okl__ 15 TF+G 01@ %X -Vr_' -2-qOqWF- IDEEAL CULTUR-AIL 501 L AS q-"Pq_Tq@AOL_C_ q-D1vm F-vp-MAWY qWV4T TA.SLr VIRVSS AI-jL> 4qMIC2qK04q51A2qL- t r-T f5ek-OqW 6q52qU6q62q5T4qK0qAT4qEq: LOJEL- O;r qWATER . . ... .. .. . Noma 8qW Figure 9 The properties of the soil in contact with bacterial or viru lent sources play a dominant role in the subsequent life and movement of the contaminant (Caldwell, 1937, 1938). Soils which are very fine to fine grained sands with a high clay content are best suited to remove biological contamination (Romero, 1972). Bacteria in wet, nutrient rich soils have been known to survive up to five years, however, 60-100 days is probably a more common life span in temperate climates (Romero, 1972). Many scientific studies report various sicknesses and epidemics caused by viruses traveling more than 50 feet in soil. Most controlled experiments indicate that viruses have a tendency to deteriorate within 10 feet of their source (Romero, 1972). Significant concentrations of anaerobic bacteria pro- bably travel 50 feet according to Caldwell (1938, 1937);and Romero (1972) concludes that under ideal conditions the maximum travel distance of biolo- gical contaminants within ground water ranges from 50 to 100 feet. However, contaminant movement in non-saturated soils is considerably less than.in saturated soils, with maximum lengths of travel appearing to be in the vicinity of 10 feet. Bacteria or viruses might travel considerably farther -188- than predicted if contaminated water is intercepted by a stream during the course of travel (Romero, 1972). If impregnated with bacteria and viruses by septic tanks or leaky sewers, partial areas, which shed surface waters, to streams, may become contaminated, creating a health hazard. BACTEAIA rP_A\jr-L. SO'-(00' IN 0RUNDWATP_P,. rOLLUTAPTS T9_,4f\JC-L VIR-US AND MUCH L_12_ss 11`1@ NOW -SATUIZATED Fv1,P IA AKsO \j I fZuseS j85A0C_74T 6E 4F-i A Cft TRAVEL rn(5444T F0AV 6E L F#,P-1-PC-IZ -T4)%,@j ?P_EPtcrE-v . . . . . . Figure 10 Setbacks The United States Public Health standards suggest a minimum setback of 100 feet between wells or watercourses and septic tanks (Romero, 1972). The Maryland Health Department requires a minimum setback of 25 feet from wells and watercourses. Romero (1972) recommends a 100 foot setback from all wells and water bodies unless it can be shown that a shorter distance will not in- crease the probability of contamination. Aquatic biologists and hydrologists realize that circumstances dictate different setbacks, and that a setback of 300 feet should be recognized as a standard if all bacteria and nutrients are to be filtered out by the soils, (Leopold, 1968; Patrick, pers. comm.) '360' Lse-r5Ar_K :5ur,6Fs-rec> 13OLEOPOLD AND PArKicK. 106 5ETSACKSUG(51@57f=_17 By DE.PT OF @4EALTW AND M. KOME11RO VA R 10 U 65 ?-1' M I WIMUM ts-rwc FROM WAMQcouesF_ 5F_T5ACKS REQU19 ED IN MAIZYLA)JD Figure 11 Using partial areas increases the accuracy of determining the length of setbacks from water bodies and aquatic systems. The setback should be de- lineated from the landward edge of the partial areas (D and D+soils). Thus, while the setback is standard, the distance from the water body is variable depending on the width of the partial area. As noted above setbacks less than 50 feet will probably not filter out the biological and nutrient con- taminants. Setbacks over 300 feet increase the adequacy. The following illustrations show the considerations of soil character and vegetation used to evaluate the adequacy of aquatic buffer zones during the field survey of sites for this study. T 189- ADEQUATE P A fz-7- IAL A F-eA -TV PA'R,71AL ARE@N S U F F F--@ ............. ..... . . . . . . . ........ .. .. .. .... 0 AIND V+ ot 9AFMAL Af-E-A NARROVIJ 5 T ?--P-A M P -T I A L A?- F--A AP 65@ 8t., C' C- so I L-S 13 F F E FZ- allESTIONADLE 5TREAM-SIDE: FAKTIAL AF-E 5.15,11C AK6 C. I" C+ . ....... . . .......... FE H A PNJ 5 CC) . . . . . . . . . . . 7 ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PARTIAL AREA -TIAL I(.. re S' 3 T-' c-, A'tJ D P ........... . . . . . ........ [+@\Nj 50, lilt [ImOllitl I I I- re Figure 12 -190- QUIR5TIONADLE (POSS]t5LY INADEQUATE-) PAR-TIAL AKCRA MWIMAL 50-5ACK n 71-7 r ;T Y-@.. F\,4!@. P55 I \j E LY D FIA I N E P 50) L--(; So -A, N F-0 50ILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I.... ....... . . . .... . ............ ..................... t>P jig", D DT 50 ApolTIoNAL BOFFEK AREA _FA2.TIAL AP_2A b. - - - - - - - - - -- S_rEEP SLOPES -2 0 WHEM :SLc)PC-5 C4P.C-ATEZ TRAPJ loolo ccc-uK NZ-A4Z 09- AD)AcZrs'r rO PA F@_T I A L A?- 9:-@ , T t+EY M (6, H T L@F_ tr-J,'_LV0GD IN T4F_ BUrF@FR ;@ofje, 416H loc7o SL-oPF-- RUNOFF MA<C- -rl4C-SE- AIRPAG . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D A D P It L s !Z- _e@, OF ?C)LLUT@ON. 0,.) 9,c PA@Z-r I A L- A I:z EA INADEaUATP WIPE 5T R C-A M - 5 t I? E@ 174N RT I A L A F, RA C, C+ 1-@+A E501 I L5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . D AND Pt DiL PACLTI,kL AREA Ap- zo VV ST REAM- Y- FAF__T I A L A 17-RA 8) 13+, C, @,ND c 5 o I L-5 @-035 T@@AK3'50' Figure 13 GLOSSARY Aquatic Buffer Zone - a band of vegetation contiguous with wetlands and watercourses which protects an aquatic system from excess runoff, erosion and contamination from non-point sources of pollution such as fertilizers and pesticides. The width of vegetated land necessary to adequately buffer the aquatic system varies, depending on the soil's ability to store water and the type and extent of the vegetation in the buffer. Aquatic System - a wetland, watercourse, or water body and contiguous areas with D or D+ soils. Bacterial Danger Zone - soil between the highest water table level and one foot below the lowest water table level; where conditions are ideal for bacterial growth. Basal Area - the area, usually measured in square feet, of the cross-section at breast height of a single tree or of all trees in a stand. Baseflow - stream flow derived from deep percolation of infiltrated water that enters the permanently saturated ground water system and discharges into the stream channel. Buffer - a limited use area between a developed area and a protected area. Categories - a division within a parameter used for the purpose of scaling. Class - a group of areas considered as a unit (e.g., wetlands, forests, fields). Community - any assemblage of populations living in a prescribed area or physical habitat. Contamination - befoulment through contact with a pollutant (e.g., pesticide, herbicide, toxic chemical, oil residue, bacteria, sediment). Contiguous Land Use - the type of use being made of land adjacent to and bordering a natural area. Critical Area - areas where man's activities can have a relatively severe impact on natural systems. Critical areas may also be habitats which are infrequently found in a state or in the nation as a whole. DBH - tree diameter at breast height (4.5 feet above the ground). Detritus particles of plant matter in varying stages of decomposition. Disturbance - a disruption, or perturbation, of an ecosystem resulting from human activity. Diversity - the number of different vegetation types, animal species or physical features (e.g., streams, scarps, bogs) which the natural area contains. Drainageway - a pathway for watershed drainage, characterized by wet soil vegetation; often intermittent in flow. Edaphic Climax - where topography, soil, water, fire and other disturbances are such that the climatic climax cannot develop. Endemic - a species of limited geographic extent. Erodibility Coefficient - (K factor) - the erosion rate per unit of erosion index for a specific soil in continuously cultivated fallow ground on a 9% slope, 72.6 feet long. This factor is used by the Soil Conservation Service to calculate the erosion from a particular soil. Exotic species - any plant or animal species not naturally a member of the plant community in which it is found. Fauna - a collective term for the animal species present in an ecosystem. Fldodplain - a,flat, low-lying area bordering a river or stream which is flooded only at times of high water. Flora - a collective term for-the plant species present in an ecosystem. Fldristics plant species composition of an area. Ground flow themovement of water within the ground. Ground water that part of the subsurface water which is in the zone of saturation. Habitat - the area of residence for an animal species or a community of species. Home ran&e - the area to which individuals, pairs, or family groups of ver- tebT'ates and the higher invertebrates restrict their activity. Infiltration - the flow or movement of water through the soil surface into the ground. Mottling - colored spots in soil horizons which indicate the existence of fludtuations in the ground water level. Natural area - areas where at present natural processes predominate and are not@significantly influenced by either deliberate manipulation or accidental interference by man. Nattiral integrity the degree to which a natural area is characterized by the natural regeneration of vegetation, mature or stable vegetation and the absence of man-induced disturbances. Natural soils group - a new classification system of the State of Maryland's Department of State Planning which groups soils into similar major proper- tie: and features. The soil typologies of each county are regrouped around six'categories of interest: agriculture, productivity, erosion susceptability, perme general, the natural soil groups are arranged in order of increasing limita ability, depth of bedrock, depth of water table, and stability. In tion for most uses. Occurrence - the relative frequency of the vegetation type(s) or natural features in a natural area within the context of its frequency of occur- rence on the Delmarva Peninsula. -193- overland flow water flowing over the ground surface. Parameter - a topic whose information is amenable to collection and analysis. Partial area - dynamic, saturated, often shallow, stony or compacted areas near streams which contribute large volumes of runoff during a storm. Perched water table - water table above an impermeable bed underlain by unsaturated rocks of sufficient permeability to allow movement of ground water. Percolation - movement under hydrostatic pressure of water through the in- terstices of the ground. Primary productivity - the amount of organic matter produced by photosynthe- SIS, Quadrat - a sampling area, usually square, of relatively small but consis- tent size. Return flow - subsurface'flow which intersects the ground surface and emerges as a spring or seep. Runoff - the discharge of water through surface streamsi expressed usually in units of volume such as gallons, cubic feet or acre-feet. Runoff potential - the potential of the soil to shed rainwater. The runoff potential rating is based on soil catenas. Soils are grouped into seven runoff potential rating categories according to.internal drainage, depth and texture of the soil as well as subsurface soil conditions. The rating system enables hydrologists or land management personnel to classify the soils hydrologically. D and D+soils have the highest runoff potential while A soils have the lowest. This system not only expands S.C,S. hydro- logic soil groups but also includes relevant soils information to reclassify certain soils based on recent research. Saturated overland flow - surface water flowing over saturated soils near streams and drainage ways. Security - the probable period of time during which no significant man- induced, direct or indirect alteration ofa natural area is foreseen. Sedimentation - the process of gravitational deposition of soil and other particles transported by water. Soil series - a group of soils developed by the same combination of genetic processes. Its horizons have similar differentiating characteristics and arrangement in the soil profile and soils have developed from the same kind of parent material. Except for the "A" horizon texture (which is used to classify soil series into types) all soils having similar physical, chemical and morphological characteristics such as structure, textureY pH, base.sa- turation, organic matter content, topographic position, drainage, depth, color, parent material and horizon thickness, type and arrangement belong to the same series. _194- Soil series are named for the geographic location where they were first described. Hence names such as Pocomoke, Sassafras, etc. Soil type - a subdivision of the soil series based on the texture of the "A" horizon. Soil individuals belonging to the same type have similar characteristics as required by the soil series as well as the same sur- face texture. Soil types derive their name by adding the surface texture to the series name. Subsection- a division of a natural area which reflects a discrete vege- tation type, site-type or natural feature. Substrate - layer beneath the soil surface. Subsurface flow - water flowing through substrate, often along impeding layers (fragipan) in the soil. Succession - a systematic series of species replacement in a biological J system. Transpiration giving off of moisture and gases through the surface of leaves and other parts of a plant. Trophic level -a step.in the food chain. T@pe - a subdivision of a class, a group having distinguishing characteris- tics, (e.g., pond, marsh, swamp; oak-beech, mixed oak, oak-pine). Uplands - sites where the soil is dry or moist most of the year including ridges, upperslopes, midslopes, lowerslopes and well drained stream ter- races. Vegetation - the mosaic of plant communities in the landscape. Ve getation. structure - the density and distribution of leaf surfaces ver- tically and horizontally. Canopy, understory, shrub and herb layers are common descriptions of vegetation structure. Vegetation types - an assemblage of plants consisting of particular species composition. The vegetation type is named for the dominant or co-dominant species. Vegetation types such as "Oak-Hickory" or "Bald cypress", may include as many as 20 different species of trees, as well as numerous shrubs and herbs. In some cases the transition between adjacent types are gradual; therefore the description given the vegetation type is more typical of the center of the type than its edge. Water table - the highest level at which the soil or underlying rock mate- ridl is wholly saturated with water. In certain places a perched water table may be separated from a lower water table by a dry zone. Well drained soil - soils nearly free of mottling and commonly of an inter- mediate texture. Wetland - any area where the water table stands at or above the land sur- face for at least part of the year. Wetlands are described according to the degree of wetness and the type of vegetation which the site supports. - r r r F t= I I I I I I I "I I I I I I I IIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 3 6668 14109 8931 1