[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]





            MECHANICAL
            PROTECTION

             GUIDELINES



I .












    NOAA / HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE r7 ASSESSMENT DIVISION
           U.S. COAST GUARD NATIONAL STRIKE FORCE


                    JUNE 1994





















































              Purpose and Use of This Guidance

    This manual and any internal procedures adopted for its implementation
are intended solely as guidance. They do not constitute rulemaking by any agency
and may not be relied upon to create a right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
 enforceable by law or in equity, by any person. Any agency or person may take
  action at variance with this manual or its internal implementing procedures.












          MECHANICAL
           PROTECTION
           GUIDELINES








   MECHANICAL PROTECTION GUIDELINES


           Dr. Jacqueline Michel'
         Dr. Sharon Christopherson2
            Cdr. Frank Whipple3










RESEARCH PLANNING, INC., COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA
2 NATIONAL OCEANIC _'7ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
    3 U.S. COAST GUARD NATIONAL STRIKE FORCE
                  JUNE 1994









CONTENTS

       Inrdcion......................................................................1....


       I Determining Oil Spill Risk                                                          ...................................................3
           Identifying potential spill sources..............................................3
           Vessel operating parameters and environmental conditions                           .....................5
           Oil.properties important to strategy development..............................10
           OPA 90 spill scenario requirements ...........................................13

       2 Prioritizing Resources.......................................................1 5
           Identifying sensitive resources ...............................................15
           Prioritizing resources at risk ..................................................19


       3 Developing Shoreline Protection Strategies .................................25
           Shoreline protection methods ................................................25
           Shoreline protection limitations ..............................................32
           Matrix of protection methods versus operational limits ........................38
           Matrix of protection methods versus support equipment .......................41


       4 Developing Site-specific Protection Strategies..............................43
           Natural resource constraints .................................................43
           General shoreline protection tactics ..........................................44
           Summary of oil recovery methods ............................................48
           Alternative protection methods ...............................................50
           Protection methods for specific physical settings ..............................53
           Steps for developing site-specific protection strategies ........................61


       5 Preparing Work Products for Area Plans ....................................65
           Presentation of work products................................................65


       6 Plan Validation .............................................................75

       Recommended References .......................................................77
       IneI...........................................................7..................7








FIGURES

       I Example plot showing the spatial distribution of spills                             ..........................6

       2   Example plot showing historical spill patterns by river mile                      . ....................7

       3 Example plot showing historical spill frequency by size..........................8

       4   Example pie charts showing the spill oil types and causes.......................9

       5 Major elements of standard boom ............................................27

       6   Cross-section sketch of one type of shallow-water boom ......................29

       7   Plot of the maximum angle for boom deployment at increasing current
           veoiisv..............................................................3..........3

       8   Matrix showing how protection methods will be impacted by operational
           liiains..............................................................4.........4

       9   Matrix showing the support equipment needed for the various protection


       10 Examples of containment booming configurations.............................45

       11 Examples of deflection and exclusion booming configuration...................47

       12 Skimmer selection and employment checklist .................................49

       13 Matrix showing feasible protection methods for various physical settings.          ......55

       14 Checklist of actions to be completed during field-verification visits to
           priority protection sites ......................................................64

       1 5 Sample location map showing the necessary information ......................66

       16 Sample map showing priority protection areas ................................68

       17 Site summary sheet to be completed for each protection priority site...........70

       18 Sample site sketch showing recommended protection strategy .................72

       19 Operations limitations checklist ..............................................74









TABLES

         1   Sensitive biological and human-use resources ........................................................16


        2       Summary of the various ESI ranking scales used throughout the
                 United States, ranked from least (ESI=I) to most (ESI=10) sensitive ...............18


        3    Worksheet for identifying priority protection sites ................................................23








INTRODUCTION


       The main objective of shoreline protection is preventing or reducing the environmental
       effects of spilled oil. This manual emphasizes providing guidance to Area Committee
       members on how best to employ mechanical protection methods, such as booms and
       barriers, when designing workable protection strategies.

       The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) directed that Area Committees be established to
       plan for a coordinated community response to an oil discharge or hazardous substance
       release. For areas under U.S. Coast Guard jurisdiction, Area Committees are designated
       for each coastal Captain of the Port zone. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       (EPA) is in charge of inland Area Committee development, and has designated each EPA
       Region as an Area and the Regional Response Teams (RRT) as the Area Committees.

       There are many components to Area Contingency Plans that need to be addressed by
       Area Committees. This manual provides a framework for the planning requirements
       specified in the Commandant Notice 16471, Annex E, Area Assessments, and focuses on
       the Notice's Appendix IV, Protection Strategies and Appendix V, Identification of
       Sensitive Areas. It also can be used by facilities who must prepare Response Plans for
       Marine Transportation-Related Facilities. These plans identify sensitive areas and set
       guidelines for protecting these resources during a spill.

       Specifically, the objectives of this manual are to:

       * Provide guidelines for identifying and prioritizing areas with sensitive habitats, fish
           and wildlife resources, and human-use resources. We include sample formats for
           mapping and describing sensitive areas that optimize maps' operational usefulness;

       *  Describe the types of shoreline protection measures available to protect sensitive
           resources, emphasizing the limits and requirements of each protection measure.
           Where mechanical shoreline protection response actions are not feasible, Area
           Committees should consider alternative protection methods;

       *  Provide guidance on developing site-specific protection strategies, including
           equipment and logistics needed, operational constraints, and physical conditions at
           the site. Charts and tables are included as tools for developing the most feasible
           and successful strategies-, and








    Encourage continuity among Area Plans to facilitate exchange of information and
    use by Regional and National Response Teams.

The manual is intended to support planning; it does not address spill response or
shoreline cleanup issues. For guidance in these areas, NOAA (1 993) has prepared a
shoreline countermeasures manual.

Although Area Committees must eventually plan for discharges of both oil and
hazardous substances, the emphasis here is on oil spills and shoreline protection.
Similar equipment and strategies are used to control and recover nearly all types of oil
products. In contrast, the range in types and behavior of hazardous substances is too
great to address in a single manual.

The planning process is as important as the final plan. Area contingency planning
provides the opportunity for cross-training among a variety of response organizations.
The success of the plan depends on the participation of the response community, as well
as of local resource experts who are likely to be involved in a spill. For example,
response contractors who understand the basis for setting protection priorities can
make better decisions in the field to fine-tune the response to the environmental
conditions of each spill. Resource managers who understand performance limitations
and logistical requirements of equipment in their areas can participate more effectively
in developing workable response strategies. There is no benefit for resource managers to
recommend booming strategies in locations where boom is operationally unfeasible or
has a high likelihood of failure. However, when operations and natural resource
personnel work together, feasible strategies can be developed to protect sensitive
resources.

Finally, it is important to note that developing the plan is only the first step. You should
field-check each priority site and revise the protection plan as necessary. The response
community should be thoroughly trained in both scientific and operational aspects of
the protection methods. In addition, you must test and refine protection plans to make
sure that they are workable and effective. Developing Area Plans is a multi-step
process: plan, train, exercise, and revise.








DETERMINING OIL SPILL RISK


Identifying Potential Spill Sources


Because identifying sensitive resources and developing protection strategies are
predicated on the location and probable trajectory of a spill, it is important to
understand the most likely spill scenarios. Oil spill risk characterization includes
analyzing the types and volumes of oil products stored and transported in the area and
historical spill patterns.


Transportation systems and patterns include waterborne, rail, highway, and pipeline. The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers publishes annual reports on waterborne commerce of the
United States for all ports and navigable waterways. These reports list the vessel freight
traffic by major commodity types, including specific petroleum types, and summarize
temporal trends in freight traffic. The Coast Guard keeps records of bunkering
notifications. State port authorities can also provide data on the types and frequencies
of oil and hazardous cargoes passing through their jurisdictions. These data can be
used to generate statistics on the frequency of shipments by oil type to identify the most
commonly handled products. Ports with Navy facilities should review traffic patterns
with local Navy representatives to identify products and volumes related to Naval
shipping and storage operations.


Data on rail transportation of oil are difficult to obtain because the only sources on
types, frequencies, and volumes are railroad companies, which generally do not have
such information readily available. Highway oil transportation patterns are also
difficult to obtain because there are numerous trucking companies and many possible
routes. However, the locations where transportation spills could affect coastal
resources, namely at bridges and waterfront rail yards, can be readily identified.
Usually, the potential spill amounts from rail and highway transportation are relatively
small compared to marine transportation. In contrast, the potential spill amount from
pipelines is highly variable, depending on the pipeline diameter, flow rate, spacing
between shut-off valves, and type of leak detection system in place. This information on
pipelines is available from each pipeline operator.


Because oil production wells can be very numerous in both onshore and offshore
regions, point locations or groups of wells should be determined. There are incomplete


                                           3








data available on pipelines from wells, especially in older fields. However, the oil
companies operating the wells can be contacted to provide information.

Storage and transfer facilities are required to determine worst-case discharges from the
facility as part of their facility response plans, which are submitted to the Coast Guard
for the transportation-related portion of the facility, and to EPA for the non-
transportation portion. The criteria used to define a worst-case discharge from
facilities are listed in 33 CFR Part 1 50, ï¿½1 54.1029. These worst-case discharge scenarios
are the best source for assessing the risk of oil spills from facilities. Likewise, vessel
response plans require planning for the worst-case discharge from a vessel, defined in
ï¿½1 55.1020 as the discharge of the vessel's entire oil cargo in adverse weather. If the
facility and vessel response plans are not available, Area Committees should get input
from industry participants in the planning process. Other facilities besides storage and
transfer facilities should be evaluated for their potential for spills (e.g., shipyards).

The spill history for the area should also be reviewed to help select sites for the spill
scenarios. National sources of historical spill data include:

      U.S. Department of
        Transportation          Coast Guard Marine Pollution-
     Hazardous Materials          Marine Safety Information     EPA Emergency Response Center
  Information System (HMIS)             System (MSIS)                Notification System

    provides location only at the   provides location by            tracks spills reported to the
    municipality level              latitudellongitude              National Response Center


State agencies also maintain spill records. 'All of these possible sources should be
investigated because there is no single source that contains all historical spill
information. The spill history is used to generate statistics to estimate the average spill
size. However, some minimum spill volume should be used to calculate the average spill
size. Between 1977 and 1990, the Coast Guard tracked approximately 105,000 oil spills
in coastal and navigable waters, including the Great Lakes and inland regions.
Ninety-five percent of these spills were less than 1,000 gallons and 74 percent were less
than 50 gallons. Because Area Committees focus on planning for larger spills, historical
petroleum spills greater than 1,000 gallons should be evaluated in terms of their
location, cause, product type, and volume as part of the risk assessment database.
Once all the available information on potential spill sources and historical spills has
been compiled, the data should be reviewed to discern trends and devise spill scenarios.
Plot the location of potential sources (facilities, pipeline, and rail crossings, for example)



                                             4








 onto maps to identify potential problem areas. Plot locations of past spills onto
 separate maps to identify spatial patterns. Through such graphical representation of
 the historical spills and potential sources, the Area Committee can identify and rank
 high-risk areas. Figures I and 2 are examples of two different ways to show the
 distribution of historical spills, for a bay and a river. Simple statistical summaries of the
 spill history should be generated by source, oil type, volume, and location. Figure 3
 shows a sample plot of the spill size versus number of spills for all spills greater than a
 minimum volume. Figure 4 shows pie charts for the spilled oil type and cause. Such
 plots are useful aids in developing appropriate spill scenarios in an area.



IVessel Operating Parameters and Environmental Conditions
 Maritime operators familiar with the area, such as harbormasters and pilots, should
 help evaluate the operational considerations for vessel traffic in the area, to identify
 hazards associated with the following:


    Areas of high currents or wave conditions
 Narrow channels with strong tidal currents, river-entrance bars, river crossings, and
 harbor entrances are sites where tides, waves, and river currents can create conditions
 hazardous to ship operations.

     Congested areas
 In congested traffic routes, there is increased risk of collision at the entrances to ports,
 narrow straits, or under bridges. Risk is often reduced by traffic separation zones or
 speed restrictions.

     Draft conistraints
 The Area Committee should identify areas where decreased maneuverability of deep-
 draft vessels could possibly account for an increased risk of spills due to groundings or
 collisions. Also, zones of shoaling can increase groundings.











                                            5


















                               Thre ii~~~~~~~~~~~mii~~~~~~~~- i(











 Missisoippi  I  1.                             o n *Seco u                                                        4
                                   Bay



















                                           +                  0          5          10
                           '~)                                        miles
   GUL F  o f  M E X I C O






Figure 1. Example plot showing the spatial distribution of spills. Data are for Mobile
          Bay, for the period 1982-1986 for spills greater than 500 gallons. It can be
          seen that historical spills tend to cluster in two locations: near the entrance
          to Mobile Bay and in the harbor. The trajectory and impact of spills in each
          of these general areas are likely to be very different.







               13

               12

               11

               10
 Number of
                9
rde d Spills
               8

                7

                6

                5




                2-'




                                                             '~          ~ ~~~~~ II
                    70-90      110-130     150-170    190-210        Algiers       Bayou        Lake 
                                                                    Canal       Savage    Fontchartrain
                                                                        Mississippi  Inner Harbor   Inner
                       I1<    ~ Mississippi River                 H          River     Navigation     Coastal
                                                                        Gulf Outlet    Canal      Waterway







            Figure 2. Example plot showing historical spill patterns by river mile. Data are for
                      petroleum spills over the period 1985-1989 along the Mississippi River, from
                      Baton Rouge (river miles 90-110) to the Gulf of Mexico. Based on these data,
                     spills are more common in the river than in adjacent waterbodies, and spills
                     can occur anywhere along the river. There is a higher frequency of spills near
                      Baton Rouge and Lake Pontchartrain. These areas might be considered as
                     sites for the worst-case spill scenario.















                                                    7








                  26

                   24

                   22
                                                                                            PETROLEUM SPILLS
                  20
    Number of
Spill Incidents
                   16

                   14

                   12

                   10

                    8

                    6                                                                                       --



                    2


                            1-5   5-10  10-15  15-20  20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45  45-50   >50
                                                    Size of Spills (x 1000 gallons)

                                                                              Source: summarized from USCG MPMSIS data









                      Figure 3. Example plot showing historical spill frequency by size. Data are for petroleum
                                spill incidents greater than 1,000 gallons over the period 1980-1990 for the
                                Philadelphia Captain of the Port zone. Small spills are much more common, and
                                large spills may be more likely to result from a limited number of sources. Both
                                location and size of historical spills should be considered in evaluating the
                                type, amount, and location of protection equipment.









TYPE of PETROLEUM SPILLED


                                         No. 1 Diesel Fuel
     Other Petroleum                                                    No. 2 Diee  Fuel
         Prodluot,      24~' "
                                      product:     No. 2 Diesel Fuel


  Clarified Fuels                                                                    l
                                                                      No, 2 Fuel Oil

                         i   rude
                         Oil    Crude  No. 4       No. 6
                             Oil     Fuel Oil     Fuel Oil






CAUSE of PETROLEUM 5PILL5


                                  Structural Failure

Intended    Discharge .. 

Tank Container



   Equipment Failurl                                                Unintended Discharge
                                                                     (Human Error)




Figure 4. Example pie charts showing spilled oil types and causes (as a percentage of total
          number of incidents). Data are for petroleum spills greater than 500 gallons for the
          period 1980-1990. Refined products are more commonly spilled, and lighter
          products are likely to be spilled, compared with heavy products








     Bottomn substrate
 Groundings are more likely to result in a discharge in areas with rocky substrates than in
 softer substrates such as sand or mud.

     Lightering being conducted in the area
 Ships carrying oil from other countries often are unable to use U.S. port facilities due to
 their size or draft limitations. Thus, cargo must be offloaded at sea or in anchorage.
 This increases the amount of traffic and should be investigated in the zone, even if the
 lightering area is outside of the designated area boundaries. Bunkering of vessels at
 anchor from barges is also a potential source of spillage.

     Seasonal considerations
 Time of the year may dictate the type of cargoes carried (e.g., increased shipments of
 heating oil in early winter), the priority of sensitive areas, and the type of weather or
 water conditions expected in a particular geographic region (e.g., low water/floods on
 rivers, ice, reduced visibility, hurricanes, or winter storms).



IOil Properties Important to Risk Assessment and Planning
 The physical and chemical properties of oil greatly affect how it will behave on the
 water surface, its persistence on the water and when stranded, the degree and
 mechanisms of toxicity, and the effectiveness of containment and recovery equipment.
 Some of the most imnportant properties include the following:
         Specific gra vity is the density of the oil relative to water. Fresh oils with a
 specific gravity less than 1.00 will float; any oil with a specific gravity greater than 1.00
 for fresh water and 1.03 for seawater will tend to sink. While most fresh oils have a
 specific gravity less than 1.00, spilled oil can reach these higher densities through
 weathering, emulsification, sorption onto suspended sediments, and incorporation of
 sediments during stranding on the shoreline. The petroleum industry uses another
 measure of the gravity of an oil, called "API gravity." An API gravity of 10 is equal to a
 specific gravity of 1.00. Oils with a high API gravity are lighter, whereas oils with an API
 gravity below 10 have the potential to sink.
         Volatility is an indicator of the amount and rate of loss of the light fractions of
 a spi'II through evaporation. Highly volatile oils pose significant explosion and
 inhalation risks to responders. However, evaporation is a very important mechanism for
 removing the oil from the water or shore, lessening the amount of oil to be recovered.


                                             10








        Flash point is the lowest temperature of a liquid at which its vapor is given off in
sufficient quantities that the vapor/air mixture is in the flammable range.
        Viscosity is a measure of the ease of flow, either on the water surface or
penetrating into sediments. Kinematic viscosity is measured in centistokes (cSt), with
2,000 cSt considered to be moderately viscous and the point at which dispersants
become marginally effective, and 10,000 cSt highly viscous. The kinematic viscosity of
diesel fuel at 15ï¿½C is about 5 cSt, whereas Bunker C can range from 1,000 cSt and up.
Oil viscosity decreases with higher temperatures and increases as a function of
weathering. Viscosity is one of the factors to be considered in evaluating dispersant
effectiveness and mechanical recovery and entrainment. Pumping of viscous oil can be
very difficult and slow, affecting lightering operations
        Pourpointis the temperature above which the oil will flow. Below this
temperature the oil becomes semi-solid, making recovery from the water surface more
difficult using standard equipment. The oil congeals into tarballs, produces less sheen,
and generates less of a dampening effect on the water surface, making it difficult to
keep track of the oil.
        Emulsification, the process by which oil is mixed with water, is particularly
important, because emulsions can contain up to 70 percent water, tripling the volume
of "oil" to recover. Emulsions decrease the recovery rate of many skimmers and the
effectiveness of alternative techniques such as in-situ burning. Emulsions weather
slowly, so they are more persistent on the water and shoreline. Formation of stable
water-in-oil emulsions (mousse) depends on the composition of the oil. Some oils are
well known for their tendency to form strong emulsions (Kuwait and La Rosa crudes) or
weak emulsions (South Louisiana crude and No. 2 fuel oil).
       The water-soluble fraction is the component of oil that dissolves in water. As
rule of thumb, 1-1.5 percent of the fraction of oil that evaporates has the potential to
dissolve in the water. Total aromatic hydrocarbons constitute 35-80 percent of the
water-soluble fraction of crude oils. The aromatic fraction is of concern because this
fraction has the greatest acute toxicity to water-column organisms.








Oil can be divided into five general types with the following properties:

    Group I: Very Light Refined Products (e.g., gasoline, naphtha, solvents, Avgas
   801100)
* Very volatile and highly flammable (flash point near 1000F/40ï¿½C);
*  High evaporation rates; complete removal by evaporation is likely;
*  Low viscosity; spread rapidly to a thin sheen;
*  Specific gravity less than 0.80; float on water;
*  High acute toxicity to biota; can cause localized, severe impacts to water-column
   and intertidal resources
*  Will penetrate substrate, causing subsurface contamination;
*  Recovery usually not attempted because of fire hazards; and
*  Exclusion booming of sensitive areas must be completed rapidly.

   Group II: Diesel-Like Products and Light Crude Oils (e.g., no. 2 fuel oil, jet fuels,
   kerosene, marine diesel, West Texas crude, Alberta crude)
*  Moderately volatile (flash point varies from 100 to 150ï¿½F/40-650C);
*  Light fractions (up to two-thirds of the spill volume) will evaporate;
*  Low to moderate viscosity; spread rapidly into thin slicks;
*  Specific gravity of 0.80 - 0.85; API gravity of 35 - 45, so slicks will float on the
   water surface, except under turbulent mixing conditions;
*  Moderate to high acute toxicity to biota; product-specific toxicity related to type
   and concentration of aromatic compounds in the water-soluble fraction;
*  Will coat and penetrate substrate; some subsurface contamination;
*  Stranded oil tends to smother organisms; and
*  Containment/recovery from the water is most effective early in the response.

   Group Ill: Medium Oils and Intermediate Products (e.g., North Slope crude, South
   Louisiana crude, intermediate fuel oils, lube oil)
*  Moderately volatile (flash point higher than 125ï¿½F/b52ï¿½C);
*  Up to one-third will evaporate;
*  Moderate to high viscosity;
*  Specific gravity of 0.85 - 0.95; API gravity of 17.5-35;
*  Variable acute toxicity, depending on amount of light fraction;
*  Can form stable emulsions;
*  Will coat and penetrate substrate; heavy subsurface contamination likely;
*  Stranded oil tends to smother organisms;



                                          12








 0  Recovery from the water and shoreline cleanup is most effective early in the
     response.

     Group IV. Heavy Crude Oils and Residual Products (e.g., Venezuela crude, Son
    Joaquin Valley crude, Bunker C, no. 6 fuel oil)
 *  Slightly volatile (flash point greater than I 500F/65"C);
 0  Little product loss by evaporation (usually less than 10-1 5 percent);
 a Very viscous to semi-solid; may become less viscous when warmed in sunlight;
 9  Specific gravity of 0.95 - 1.00; API gravity of 10 - 17.5; so slicks will float initially
     and sink only after weathering or incorporating sediment;
 0  Low acute toxicity relative to other oil types;
 *  Form stable emulsions-,
 *  Little penetration of substrate likely;
 *  Stranded oil tends to smother organisms; and
 *  Recovery from the water and shoreline cleanup difficult during all stages of
     response.

     Group V.- Very Heavy Residual Products
 *  Very similar to all properties of Group IV oils, except that the specific gravity of the
     oil is greater than 1.0 (API gravity less than 10). Thus, the oil has a greater potential
     to sink when spilled.



IOPA 90 Spill Scenario Requirements

 Area Committees are required to develop three oil-spill scenarios to prepare their
 response strategies:
         Most proba b/c discharge: This scenario is based on the size of the average spill
 in the area. When determining the most probable discharge, any unusually large spill
 that would skew the value should not be included when calculating the average.
 Alternatively, the median rather than the mean spill volume could be used. The most
 probable type of spilled product can also be determined from tihe spill history. Product
 type is particularly important in determining the persistence of spilled oil and the
 effectiveness of recovery strategies. The spill history should be evaluated to determine if
 there are temporal trends (e.g., decreasing spill volumes since change of a power plant
 from oil to natural gas) that should be factored in.



                                            1 3








        Maximum most proba ble discharge: This scenario is based on the largest
recorded spill size for the area. The maximum most probable discharge will take into
account such factors as the size of the largest recorded spill, traffic flow through the
area, hazard assessment, risk assessment, seasonal considerations, spill histories, and
operating records of facilities and vessels in the area. The spill histories (including
potential spills) are particularly important in identifying likely spill locations and type
of product likely to be spilled, unless there have been major changes in petroleum
transportation patterns in the area.
        Worst-case discharge: For vessels, this scenario is based on discharge of the
vessel's entire cargo, for facilities, the largest foreseeable discharge; fo'r both vessels and
facilities, catastrophic product loss under adverse weather conditions.


These spill-planning scenarios can be a useful test of mechanical protection plans,
especially where oil spill trajectories are available for specific scenarios. These
trajectories can be used to estimate the location of likely shoreline impacts and the
associated protection strategies. They can also be used to help select equipment-staging
areas. Oil trajectories can be determined using the output of NOAA's On-Scene Spill
Model (OISSM), models run by other groups, or simple calculations based on average
currents and wind conditions for the scenario.


    Delineating Sub-Areas
Most planning areas are large and include diverse habitats, resources, likely spill sources,
and trajectories. Thus, to facilitate prioritizing, most Area Committees subdivide their
Areas into logical risk sub-areas and some develop Geographical Response Plans for
these sub-areas. These sub-areas should be delineated based on the likely spill sources,
analysis of the short-term trajectory under both typical and worst-case conditions, and
nature of the sensitive areas to be protected. With smaller sub-areas, it is easier to rank
sensitive areas and identify optimum locations for staging of equipment. Even large
bays can be divided into separate sub-areas, particularly if there are distinct differences
in oil spill risk, likely source of a spill, circulation patterns, and the distribution or type
of sensitive resources.










                                            1 4








2      PRIORITIZING  RESOURCES


      IIdentifying Sensitive Resources
       Resources are considered sensitive to oil spills because they are: 1) of environmental,
       economic, or cultural importance; 2) at risk of coming in contact with spilled oil; and
       3) likely to be affected once oiled. Sensitive resources can usually be identified using
       existing databases of oil sensitivity for aquatic and marine resources developed from
       many case histories and extensive research. However, setting protection priorities
       requires value judgments and difficult trade-offs by the Area Committee, a group with
       its own diverse interests and values.


       For planning purposes, sensitive resources potentially at risk from oil spills can be
       divided into three categories:


       *  Habitats
       *   Fish and wildlife resources
       *   Human-use resources


       Table I lists the sub-categories of resources that have been found to be most sensitive to
       oil spills. For shoreline habitats, many Area Committees use the'shoreline rankings on
       Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) maps to identify habitats and assign a priority
       classification. The ESI ranking is based on the physical and biological character of the
       different coastal types, which in turn control the persistence of stranded oil, severity of
       impact, and ease of cleanup. Table 2 lists the ESI rankings for all shorelines throughout
       the U.S. The highest-priority habitats generally include vegetated wetlands (ESI=1Q)
       and tidal flats (ESI=9). Lowest priority includes the high-energy shoreline habitats
       (ESI=1 and 2). Of the beaches, gravel beaches are ranked highest because of the
       likelihood of deep penetration, difficulty of cleanup, and long-term persistence.
       Subtidal habitats, such as coral reefs and seagrass beds, are deemed sensitive when they
       are used by oil-sensitive species or are themselves sensitive to oil spills. A detailed
       discussion of the basis for habitat sensitivity rankings is provided in NOAA (1992, 1993).









                                                   1 5










Table 1. Sensitive biological and human-use resources.
Resource Category            Sub-Category                            Comments
Habitats                     Shoreline types                         ESI or other geomorphological class
                             Submerged aquatic vegetation           All types of subtidal grass beds
                             Kelp beds
                             Coral reefs
                             Worm beds
Fish and Wildlife Resources
Marine Mammals               Whales                                  Seasonal use areas; migration routes
                             Dolphins                               Population concentration areas
                             Sea lions                              Haulouts
                             Seals                                  Haulouts
                             Sea otters                             Population concentration areas
                             Manatees                               Population concentrations areas
                             Walruses                               Haulouts

le'rrestrial Mammals         Water-associated species (e.g., otter,   Concentration areas
                             beaver, mink)
                             Endangered species                     Important habitats, as identified by
                                                                    resource agency

Birds                        Waterfowl                               Nesting/concentration areas;
                                                                    wintering/migration areas
                             Seabirds                               Rookeries; wintering concentration areas
                             Shorebirds                             Nesting sites; migration stopover sites;
                                                                    wintering concentration areas
                             Wading birds                           Rookeries; important forage areas
                             Gulls/terns                            Nesting sites
                             Raptors                                Nest sites; important forage areas
                             Other migratory species                Nest sites; important migration stopover
                                                                    sites; wintering concentration areas
                             Endangered species                     Important habitats, as identified by
                                                                    resource agency

lish                         Anadromous fish                         Spawning streams
                             Beach spawners                         Spawning beaches
                             Nursery areas                          Areas for all nearshore species;
                                                                    areas of unique concentrations
                             Endangered species                     Important habitats, as identified by
                                                                    resource agency

Shellfish                    Mollusc                                Seed beds; leased/abundant beds

Crustaceans                  Shrimp                                  Nursery areas
                             Crabs                                  Nursery areas; high concentration sites
                             Lobster                                Nursery areas; high concentration sites








                                                      16










Table 1. Sensitive biological and human-use resources, cont.
      Data Element                    Sub-Element                            Comments
Reptiles/Amphibians        Water-associated species (e.g., sea  Nursery areas; high concentration sites
                          turtles, alligators)
Plants                     Endangered species                   Important habitats, as identified by
                                                             resource agency

Human-Use Resources
Recreation                 Beaches                              High-use recreational beaches
                          Marinas
                          Boat ramps
                          Diving areas
                          Boating/fishing                     High-use recreational areas
                          State parks

ManagementAreas            Marine sanctuaries/national parks
                          Wildlife refuges
                          Preserves/reserves                  Areas of special biological concern

Resource                   Subsistence                          Designated subsistence harvest sites
Extraction                 Commercial fisheries                 Concentration areas
                          Water intakes                       Industrial; drinking water; irrigation
                          Aquaculture sites                   Water intakesipens/ponds
                          Other resource extraction sites (e.g.,
                          log storage)

Cultural                   Archaeological sites
                          Native lands                        Culturally important sitesireservations
                          Historical sites                    Water-associated sites




For fish and wildlife resources, the emphasis is on habitats where:


*   Large numbers of animals are concentrated in small areas, such as bays, where
    waterfowl concentrate during migration or overwintering;
*   Animals come ashore for birthing, resting, or molting, such as marine mammal
    haulouts and pupping areas;
*   Early life stages are present in somewhat restricted areas or in shallow water, such
    as anadromous fish streams and turtle-nesting beaches;
*   Habitats are very important to specific life stages or migration patterns, such as
    foraging or overwintering;
*   Specific areas are known to be vital sources for seed or propagation;
*   The species are on Federal or state threatened or endangered lists; or
*   A significant percentage of the population is likely to be exposed to oil.


                                                17









Human-use resources of concern are listed as the last four elements in Table 1. Areas of
economic importance, like waterfront hotels, should also be considered when
establishing resource protection priorities. Human-use resources are most sensitive
when:


*   Archaeological and cultural sites are located in the intertidal zone;
*   Oiling can result in significant commercial losses through fouling, tainting, or
    avoidance because of public perception of a problem;
*   The resource is unique, such as a historical site; or
*   Oiling can result in human health concerns, such as tainting of water intakes and
    subsistence fisheries.




Table 2.  Summary of the various ESI ranking scales used throughout the United States,
           ranked from least (ESI = 1) to most (ESI = 10) sensitive.

ESI No.  Shoreline Type
1       Exposed rocky cliffs
        Exposed vertical seawalls made of concrete, wood, or metal
2       Exposed wave-cut platforms in bedrock
        Scarps in clay with associated wave-cut platforms
        Exposed bluffs in unconsolidated sediments with associated wave-cut platforms
        Fine-grained sand beaches
4       ('oarse-grained sand beaches
        Mixe'd sand and gravel beaches
        Mixed sand and shell beaches
        Gravel beaches
        Riprap
/       Exposed tidal flats
f3      Sheltered vertical rocky shores
        Sheltered bedrock ledges
        Sheltered rubble slopes
        Sheltered solid man-made structures, such as bulkheads
)9      Shellered tidal flats
        Sheltered low banks
1X)     Salt-water marshes
        Fresh-water marshes (herbaceous vegetation)
        Fre.sh-water swamps (woody vegetation)
        Mangroves



Many references can be used to identify sensitive resources, including ESI atlases, state
and Federal resource inventories, resource management plans, and Environmental
Impact Statements. ESI maps have been prepared for the entire U.S. coastline; these
maps show the distribution and seasonality of oil-sensitive fish and wildlife, human-use



                                               18








 resources, and shoreline sensitivity, mostly on U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute
 topographic maps. State and local resource management plans for specific areas can
 provide detailed information on the size or relative importance of local populations,
 which is critical when assigning protection priorities. The knowledge of local resource
 managers is particularly important to include, since they often have access to
 unpublished data and are intimately familiar with the area's resources.



IPrioritizing Resources at Risk
 Establishing site-specific resource protection priorities is a very difficult but critical task.
 Effective response during the early hours of a spill is essential to reduce the potential
 spill damage. First responders must be able to deploy protection equipment
 immediately after a spill occurs. When protection priorities are established and tested
 in advance, response times can be significantly reduced.


 The specifics of a particular spill and the temporal and spatial variations in important
 resources can alter protection priorities. Once local resource experts are activated
 during a spill, they can fine-tune pre-established protection priorities. Valuable time is
 lost, however, if you do not establish initial priorities in advance.


 Resource priorities are usually divided into three classes, as follows:


 A   =  Highest priority: protect first
 B   =  Protect after Aareas
 C -=  Protect after B areas


 Each Area Committee may have a different set of criteria for ranking its sensitive
 resources. Resource prioritizing is an iterative process,,best achieved through open
 discussion and consensus-building among all interested parties before a spill. It requires
 considering a wide range of factors, including resource value, likelihood of the resource
 coming in contact with oil under the spill scenarios, and the relative duration of impact.


 Assuming that all the resources being considered are sensitive and valuable, the
 prioritizing process should address those likely to be oiled, that is, those that have a high
 risk of exposure. Often, there are highly sensitive resources in locations that are not
 likely to be threatened from an oil spill (e.g., above annual high-water levels; not


                                             19








dlirectly connected to an open water body where spills are likely; inland eagle nests).
These areas might be listed with a lower priority for protection in the plan, even though
they are highly sensitive.


The relative ability of the resource to recover once oiled is another important
prioritizing guideline. Generally, resources are considered sensitive if they are likely to
endure long-term impacts resulting from exposure to oil spills. Therefore, when
prioritizing sensitive resources, those that are likely to require longer periods of recovery
should receive a higher rating. For example, sheltered, interior marshes that have little
exposure to natural removal processes should have higher priority than more exposed
marshes. Species that are already stressed by other factors or are undergoing long-term
declines should also have a higher priority.

Ranking criteria can include relative size, number of individuals present, and importance

to the resource or local population as a whole. Sometimes these rankings can be
numerically defined. For example, a major harbor seal haulout (priority A) would be
those sites with more than one hundred animals typically present. Alternatively, major
resources can be defined as those representing a percentage of the local resource, such
as the anadromous streams that contribute to the majority of the annual escapement.
Finally, characteristics of priority areas would include those that serve numerous
functions in the natural community. For example, a wetland area may serve as a
nursery for fish, as habitat for endangered species, and be heavily used by birds. These
areas provide excellent quality in the ecosystem. However, for many resources, there is
no quantitative basis for ranking. In these cases, the knowledge and expertise of the
resource managers form the basis for these value judgments.


The priority of a site can change seasonally, because of changes in the distribution of
natural resources or their sensitivity. In particular, seasonal sensitivity will vary with the
presence of large concentrations of migrating or overwintering birds, or when early life
stages are in shallow waters or concentrated in susceptible habitats, such as intertidal
spawning beds. Such seasonal influences on site priority include:
        Presence/abseneceof sensitive animals. In areas where the habitat is not
particularly sensitive, such as open water or rocky shores, protection priorities will be a
function of when the animals are present. For example, waterbodies that can contain
large numbers of migratory waterfowl would be sensitive only during migration periods,
and, in the event of a spill, only if the waterfowl were actually present or soon to arrive.


                                           20








However, if the habitat is susceptible to long-term impacts, the site may keep its priority.
For example, some anadromous fish spawning habitat is sensitive even when the adult
fish are absent and there are no eggs or larvae present, because contamination is likely
to persist and affect the value of the habitat.
        Life history of the sensitive resources. Early life stages are usually the most
sensitive to oil spill impacts, both directly and indirectly. Nesting adult birds can survive
light oiling but even small amounts of oil will greatly reduce egg-hatching success.
Also, response disturbances, such as foot and equipment traffic, can drive parents from
the nesting area, leading to nest abandonment or hatchling starvation. Thus, site
priorities may increase when eggs or young are present.


Habitats do not usually show strong seasonal differences in sensitivity. Wetland
vegetation is more likely to be affected if oiled during the growing season, but the
seasonal differences are not large enough to change the protection priority on the basis
of the vegetation alone. However, the likelihood of being oiled can vary seasonally, e.g.,
ice protection of shorelines or isolation of an area during low-water periods.


The prioritizing process consists of the following activities. First, the sub-committee
working on resource priorities should prepare lists of the types of resources to be
considered under each priority ranking. (Use the list of resources in Table 1 as a start.)
Update these initial lists throughout the process, so that the final list for each priority
can be included in the area plan.


Second, the sub-committee needs to compile information on the distribution of sensitive
resources, management status, location of critical habitats for species of concern,
habitat quality, and habitat use by sensitive resources. Using maps and resource
information, identify and locate sensitive areas on an overview map. Give each site a
number and use a worksheet similar to that shown in Table 3 to record available
information on the site. All resources can be mapped together, or separate workgroups
can be formed to address different groups, e.g., fish/shellfish, birds, or mammals. At the
end of this step, locate all of the sensitive resources on maps, and summarize on a
worksheet the specific sensitive resources present and to be protected. Sites with
multiple resources and functions should become obvious. Guidelines should emerge as
to the important considerations in setting protection priorities in the area. The
workgroup should write down these candidate guidelines for prioritizing as they are
proposed.


                                           21








Third, in addition to the fact that the resource is sensitive, two other factors are
extremely important in setting priorities: the likelihood that the resource will be
impacted during an oil spill and the duration of the impact. Likelihood of impact is a
function of the following: geographic position of the resource relative to likely spill
sources/trajectories; position relative to the water surface and intertidal zone, inasmuch
as most oils float or come ashore along the high-water line; and percent of time spent
on the water surface or exposed during low water. For example, seaducks are usually
more susceptible to oiling than dabbling ducks, because dabbling ducks are usually
concentrated in shallow ponds that are not directly connected to open water; and
subtidal seagrass beds are much less susceptible than intertidal wetlands. The likelihood
of impact can be ranked on a relative scale, such as:


ï¿½  Low: Resource present in water depths greater than ten meters, on land above the
    normal spring high tide level, or in isolated waterbodies.


ï¿½  Medium: Resource present in water depths of one to ten meters, spends most of its
   time away from the water, or in locations which oil slicks from likely spill scenarios
   will take one to two days to reach.


ï¿½  High: Resource present in the intertidal zone, spends most of its time on the water
    surface, or is located in close proximity to likely spill sources.


The likelihood of direct impact of the resources at each site is described on the
worksheet, including the reason for each ranking.


Another consideration in setting protection priorities is the ability of the resource to
recover once oiled. Although difficult to quantify, resource recovery can be ranked on a
relative scale for the resources in the area or sub-area. Duration of impact is a
combination of both persistence of oil in a habitat and the ability of the resource to
recover once the oil effects are gone. Thus, areas exposed to physical processes that
speed natural removal of oil from the habitat usually have shorter impacts than those
sheltered from such processes. Also, certain types of resources can recover more quickly
from the acute toxic effects of exposure (e.g., phytoplankton) than other resources (e.g.,
20 years for a mangrove forest to grow to maturity). A recommended ranking system
for living resources is listed below. A different ranking will be required for non-living
resources, such as cultural resources.


                                           22







Table 3. Worksheet for identifying priority protection sites.

 Site          Site             Specific Sensitive        Likelihood of         Seasonality      Duration    Res          Other
 No.          Nanme                 Resources            Direct Impacts   Sp    Su    F  W   of Impact    Pri   Considerations








ï¿½ Low: Resource restabilizing or repopulating will likely occur within six months.

ï¿½ Medium: Resource restabilizing or repopulating will take 6-12 months.

ï¿½  High: Resource restabilizing or repopulating is likely to take more than 12 months.

The seasonal distribution of the resource is very important information, particularly if it
may change the protection priority of a site or resource. For example, a site may be of
high priority only during winter months, when large flocks of overwintering waterfowl
are present or only during summer months in areas of high recreational use. Other sites
will be of high priority year-round. Document on the worksheet any seasonal changes
in site sensitivity, or in the likelihood or duration of impact.

Other considerations for the resource that would affect the priority ranking might
include overall quality of the habitat and its potential to serve as a source for
recruitment and recolonizing (e.g., seed beds in a large shellfish-producing area), public
use, or some unique feature of the habitat that makes it more sensitive than similar
habitats.

All of the data collected and recorded up to this point are used to reach consensus on
the initial priority of each sensitive area, which is recorded on the worksheet and
encoded on the maps. Maps are very important tools that can assist in the prioritizing
process. Maps of sensitive areas color-coded by protection priority identify problem
areas, potential inconsistencies, and missed sites. Stretches with large numbers of "A"
priority sites should be re-evaluated to refine the rankings. Protection methods or
feasibility should not be a factor in ranking at this time; the ranking should be based
strictly on resource sensitivity. Detailed maps will be needed in the final plan to show
the location of priority areas (as discussed in Section 5). However, a larger overview
map of each area or sub-area is much more valuable during prioritization to show
spatial patterns and omissions. These overview maps can be used during the final
prioritizing process when specific protection methods are recommended for each site.

It should be noted that, during actual spill events, the priority of a site does not change
except for when the resource manager determines that the sensitive resource to be
protected is not present (e.g., the waterfowl have already migrated). Even if an "A"
priority site is not in the threat zone of a spill, it still remains an "A" site. However, only
those sites likely to be impacted by the oil spill are to be protected.



                                            24








3      DEVELOPING SHORELINE PROTECTION  STRATEGIES


       Existing methods and technology used in protecting resources from oil spilled on the
       water are based on three principles:


       1. Oil has a density less than water and floats. Under turbulent conditions, the oil can
           be physically dispersed in the water column and not exist as a surface slick;
       2. Oil has properties that attract it to some materials and displace it from others; and
       3. Oil is a compound that undergoes rapid changes once spilled into water. Evapora-
           tion, dilution, and emulsification can rapidly change oil properties, requiring
           different methods of shoreline protection and recovery as the spill progresses.


       The three principles of mechanical protection are containment, deflection, and
       exclusion. Containment consists of deploying a boom or other barrier to hold the oil in
       place, with oil recovery the main objective. Deflection consists of diverting moving oil
       either away from a sensitive area without any attempt to recover the oil at that site, or
       toward a containment site where recovery of the oil is more feasible. Exclusion consists
       of placing either temporary or permanent barriers to prevent oil from reaching an area;
       usually there is no attempt to recover the oil.


       Recovery is the actual removal of the oil, which is achieved by skimmers, sorbent
       material, and manual pick-up. All spills require a combination of methods,
       technologies, and tactics to minimize or eliminate the threat. Each method has its
       limitations and must be employed within certain criteria or operational guidelines.


       This section includes a brief discussion of mechanical shoreline protection methods,
       limitations in their use and performance, general protection tactics, oil recovery
       methods, alternative protection methods, and guidelines for selecting protection
       methods for specific physical settings.



      IShoreline Protection Methods
       Shoreline protection technology has not greatly changed or improved over the last ten
       to fifteen years. The basic methods are open-water recovery, floating booms, and solid
       barriers. Each of these is briefly described below.




                                                  25







    Open~-Water Recomey
Open-water recovery includes using skimmers on oil slicks and netting systems for
tarballs and highly viscous oils. Skimming of uncontained slicks can consist of either
self-propelled skimming vessels or towed skimmer units. Storage capability and time
needed to offload are very important considerations in determining the effectiveness of
oil recovery by skimmers. Historically, skimming efforts have recovered only 10-30
percent of the spilled oil. Skimming systems employing winged or towed booms increase
the encounter rate with oil and improve overall collection of the oil. Frequently,
skimming is the only option in areas with very strong currents and water too deep to
anchor booms. Skimmers are most effective on thick slicks or areas such as convergence
zones where the oil tends to accumulate in thicker concentrations. If the spilled oil
emulsifies, skimmer performance usually decreases significantly.

In areas of shallow water or strong currents, it may be possible to collect or corral the
oil and bring it to deeper water or low-current areas that have better skimmer access
and higher recovery rates. Towing speeds of the corralled oil must not exceed 0.7 knots;
otherwise, the oil will be lost by entrainment under the boom. Towing should be with
the direction of the current to reduce the relative speed'of the oil and boom through the
water.

For spills where the oil is highly viscous or has formed tar balls, netting systems may
enhance oil recovery. Using technology adapted from the fishing industry, a net is either
moored or towed, allowing the oil to be collected and recovered.

   Booms
Boom deployment is by far the most common method of protection. Booms are
essentially devices placed on the water surface to form a floating barrier to oil slicks.
All booms are manufactured using five elements: flotation, skirt, ballast, longitudinal
strength member, and connectorlanchoring points (Figure 5).

The flotation system provides buoyancy to keep the boom afloat. The freeboard is the 
above-water area that prevents oil from splashing over the top. In many booms, the
flotation system and freeboard are combined. The skirt provides the area below the
water's surface (draft) to prevent or limit oil passing under the boom. Combined, the
freeboard and skirt comprise the barrier that prevents or reduces oil passage. Ballast
weights maintain the boom in as near-vertical position as possible. The longitudinal
strength member is the element that allows long sections of boom to be deployed

                                           26








 without separation, normally by using high-strength boom material, chain, or wire rope

 capable of withstanding loads created by currents, wind, towing, and positioning of the

 boom. The last element is the connector and anchor points, which allow anchoring of

the boom or connection to another length of boom. Booms are usually fabricated in 50

to 100-foot sections and need to be connected into the appropriate lengths. It should

 be noted that the many different kinds and brands of boom on the market do not

always have compatible connections.















                            Figure 5.  Major  elements  of  standard boom.~~~~~~~~~~~

                       Boom   is   manufactured  for many different applications, and in many different shapes~.',.-.    .
                         and    sizes.    There    are   four   basic  application types: shallow-water boom, inland or river~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,4.
                    bom abrboan pnwtrbo.                                                 Teseiiain o ahaelse eo
             and  briefly discussed in the~~~~**   folo       in s ecion. We omnbge sntawy
 beter the4          lage th  bom                   h                                            oei ilb ubett urnsadwn. Soren
  bomilodscseatoghisgnrllo sda   st               n-ln bare to.   oil...
           Although~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_               not                         dicusd erthreae ls peil-uroe oossuh sfie om o

inst burn                                                       i         n an  ec4bo o mr emnetisalain.Colceolsol
                          bermoe a oo s osil t reetenrinet n ls o il ddtonly
                         boom~~~~~ ply nipratrl nrcvr prtosweesimr r sd



                                                                 27~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4      444.4









                                  BOOM SIZE CHART

SERVICE                   FREEBOARD               DRAFT             SEA CONDITION
                           (inches)             (inches)              wave height
Shallow-waler             0 and ahovc              < 6                  calm
Inland/river              4-10                     6-12                 < I foot
I larhor/( ;real I Lakes     I O-18                12-24                < 3-4 feet
Open-Waler                > 18                     > 24                 < 6 feet


Effective boom deployment depends on many factors, including working with shorter
lengths of boom that are more manageable; positioning the boom correctly during the
first attempt; and sealing the shoreline end of the boom so that the oil cannot get past
at high water or under the boom when a gap forms between the boom and water
surface, such as on a steep river bank or beach on a falling tide. Once deployed, boom
must be regularly maintained, including checking for wear and tear, ensuring that
anchor lines are secure, repositioning anchors where there is excessive boom
deformation, and repositioning the boom when currents change or the boom is
ineffective.

       Shallow-water Boom
Shallow-water boom is designed for deployment in very shallow water where
traditional boom may foul on the bottom during low water levels. This boom's special
features allow it to conform to the substrate, so that it can continue to act as a barrier
to oil during changing tides or lower water levels. Some use ballast tubes that are filled
with water and actually can lay on the bottom to provide a seal against oil passage
(Figure 6). Shallow-water boom is also effective in higher-current areas because the
shallow skirt minimizes the drag in the current. Shallow-water boom is also known as
"Texas boom," or "intertidal boom."

       Inland Boom
Inland boom is the smallest conventional boom and is designed for deployment in very
shallow water; note that the draft is only 6-12 inches. It is normally deployed in more
protected waters where there is little to no wave action.

       I larbor Boom
Harbor boom is medium-sized boom that has a deeper draft than does inland boom,
but still requires protected waters where wave heights or wind conditions do not cause




                                          28







splashover. Often, it is difficult to estimate whether actual site conditions will be calm
enough to deploy this type of boom.



















Figure 6. Cross-section sketch of one type of shallow-water boom.

       Open-water Boom
Open-water boom is the largest of all boom and required in any offshore situation or
when prevailing sea conditions dictate maximum protection. This boom size requires
mechanical equipment for deployment, boats to position or maintain the boom, and
multiple anchors for proper positioning. These booms are capable of generating very
high loads when moored in even moderate currents, requiring substantial support vessels
and highly skilled personnel.

       Sorbent Boom
Sorbent boom is designed primarily to absorb or adsorb oil although it can act as a
protective measure against thin oil sheens under very quiet water conditions. Circular
sorbent boom (also called "sausage" boom) readily rolls over in any current, making it
an ineffective barrier to flowing oil. Sausage booms are most effective with low-
    vsoiyoils, such as diesel fuel. Snare boom (pom-poms tied onto a line) is effective as
 a orbent of more viscous oils under higher wave and current conditions. In any current,


away from marshes and tidal flats where water depths are too shallow for booms.
When used with conventional boom, sorbents can be placed outside of the boom to pick
up small amounts of escaping oil (primarily sheen), or inside the boom to sorb small
amounts of contained oil.



                                          29







   Solid Barriers
Solid barriers are structures constructed across a feature to prevent oil and/or water
passage. They can be permanent structures, such as flow gates or locks, or temporary
structures, such as darns or trenches. It may be necessary to allow for water passage,

depending on the water flow rates and volumes or downstream water needs. In general , 
solid barriers are most effective where the area to be protected is narrow with low
water volumes and currents, such as small streams and creek mouths.

       Ildrthen Barriers or Berms
Earthen barriers or berms are built across sensitive areas to prevent entry of
contaminants or to divert oil toward collection areas for containment and recovery. An
earthen barrier placed across a sheltered beach or ephemeral tidal inlet will provide
good protection: they are less effective where wave activity or strong currents can erode
them. Methods of water passage or circulation, such as pumps, may have to be
developed to maintain water quality (e.g., dissolved oxygen, temperature) or minimum
flow volumes when the barrier cuts off water flow or exchange.

       Dams (Underfiow and Overflow)
A darn is an earthen barrier with a mechanism that allows for passage of clean water
while containing the oil. An underflow darn allows water to flow through the bottom
of the darn and floating oil to accumulate on the water surface behind the dam. Piping
is normally run under or through the dam to let clean water through. Because low
water volume is the most critical factor in selecting underflow darns, this method is only
effective in small creeks.

Overflow dams are designed to generate a low-flow pool of water behind the dam,
making it easier to divert and recover the oil. They are effective with larger volumes of
water because the water does not have to flow through restricted piping.

       Improvised Barriers
Improvised barriers have been developed out of necessity and the ingenuity of response
personnel when mnore traditional methods were not available. These barriers can take
any shape or form and can be made with anything, ranging from chain-link fencingI
with hay bales to fishing nets strung out with lumber or boards as the fence. Booms
have been made out of logs in some areas. Improvised barriers are most commonly used
along small creeks in inland areas.



                                          30








       Trenches
Trenches may be used to hold or divert oil temporarily to an area to prevent it from
contaminating a more sensitive site. Trenches can be dug at rivers' edges to divert oil to
containment areas. Trenches placed near the high-tide line along sheltered beaches and
exposed tidal flats can trap the oil. However, they should not be used on exposed
beaches because they will fill with sand and heavily contaminate sediment. If there is
time, trenches should be lined to prevent sediment and groundwater contamination.

       Flow Gates/Ticle Gates
Various waterbodies may have flow gates to control water movement. Flow gates may
be manipulated to decrease water currents in selected channels so that booms and
skimmers are more effective, contain oil within a drainage boundary by temporarily
closing the gate; keep oil from being transported into sensitive areas, especially in tidal
areas where tide gates are common; and divert oil to a less sensitive area.

       Locks
Locks are permanently installed in many river and lake systems to allow the passage of
vessels. When closed, locks may be considered the ultimate boom because they
effectively block the passage of oil and debris. However, closing locks also means
stopping vessel traffic, which may provide an additional operational problem.

   Other Mechanical Protedton Measures

       Air and Water Streams
Air and water streamns may be used to herd or push floating oil toward recovery devices
or away from sensitive sites. This technique is not considered a primary protection
method but is a tool to enhance collection. Plunging water jets are used to create an oil
barrier and are particularly effective in high-current areas. Plunging water jets
incorporate high-pressure, high-volume water directed perpendicular to the direction of
oil flow.

       Bubble Barriers
Bubble barriers use air bubbles rising to the surface to cause a counter-current at the
water's surface. Perforated piping installed along the bottom carries the forced air. A
bubble curtain is generated as the air rises to the surface. This method is only effective
in protected areas or harbors where there is limited current, and may be used where
obstructing traffic is a concern.


                                           3 1







IShoreline Protection Limitations
 Limitations to the use and performance of shoreline protection methods can be divided
 into three general categories: properties of the spilled product, physical and
 environmental conditions, and logistical constraints.

     Spilled Product Prcperties
 The properties of the spilled product will influence the selection and effectiveness of
 methods for shoreline protection, Response plans for very light refined products such as
 gasoline may consist primarily of short-term protection strategies of sensitive areas
 until the product completely evaporates. They must also take into account explosion
 potential, human health, and environmental toxicity. In contrast, a heavy fuel oil spill is
 more likely to reach shorelines and to require strategies for long-term cleanup. Medium
 crudes tend to emulsify into a viscous fluid, making the oil difficult to pick up with
 standard types of equipment.

    Phnysical and Environmental Conditions
 Physical and environmental conditions control the feasibility of mechanical protection
 methods. Area Committee members need to evaluate how these conditions will affect
 the selection, deployment, and performance of protection strategies at each site.

        Current
 Strong currents are probably the greatest single limitation to the effectiveness and
 performance of most protection strategies. Oil on the water surface will move at the
 same velocity and direction as the current. Where floating oil being transported by a
 current encounters a boom placed perpendicular to the current, the oil begins to
 accumulate against the freeboard area of the boom. If the current velocity or towing
 speed normal, or perpendicular, to the boom is over 0.7 knots, the oil that has
 accumulated against the boom may pass under it. This is called "entrainment." Fast
 currents may also cause oil to splash over the boom top. In most coastal settings,
 currents are caused by tidal changes whose alternating directions also complicate boom
 deployment.

 Figure 7 shows the deployment angle of the boom required for increasing current
 velocities. These angles result in an effective current velocity at the boom of less than
 0.7 knots. In most channels subject to currents, boom should not be placed straight
 across the channel, perpendicular to flow. Even where currents. are relatively weak, oil



                                           32 







will collect at a pocket in the boom that usually forms in the middle of the channel, the
area of strongest flow (in straight channels). In most cases, the oil should be deflected
to the shoreline where it can be more easily recovered.


0OOM ANGLE5 FOR VARIOUS CURRENT5


             400 BOO
WATER VELOCITY                                    -k4
(feet per minute)                                                             WATER VELOCITY



             200 -                   21
             200                                                         -2






             100- -2



               0
                   0            I  I      I     I     I      I     I
                 0    10    20    50   40    50    60    70    80   90
                             BOOM ANGLE to 5ANK (d1egrees)

       Figure 7. Plot of the maximum angle for boom deployment at increasing current velocities.


       Waves
Both swells and short-period waves affect the usefulness of protection methods by
causing uneven surface areas that may hamper efforts to contain or direct floating oil.
Once the boom begins to move erratically, performance drops rapidly. Further, the
safety risk to personnel working in rough seas is a major concern.


Short-period waves can severely limit the effectiveness of protection methods by
splashing oil over booms, eroding barriers, and damaging equipment. Waves can cause
problems even in some bays and estuaries with large effective fetches of open water,
especially during storms. Shallow-water boom is totally ineffective and harbor boom
effectiveness diminishes greatly at wave heights greater than two to three feet,




                                        33







especially nearshore. Large waves can be quite unpredictable and pose significant risks
to response personnel operating boats on the water and equipment on the shore.

       Tidal Effects
All U.S. coastal areas are subject to tidal fluctuations that create strong tidal currents,
especially those areas with tidal ranges exceeding six feet (for example, the Georgia
Bight, New England, and Alaska). These currents shift direction every six hours, except
for the Gulf Coast. However, they may not have the same velocities on opposing tides or
even ensuing tides in the same direction of flow, particularly in areas with a strong
diurnal inequality such as the West Coast. Therefore, in order for a booming protection
strategy to be effective, the responder must be able to change the boom configuration
every six hours and be prepared to deal with drastically differing local topography and
water levels as the tides shift. The danger of losing collected oil as the tide changes is
also a problem. Thus, timing is extremely critical in these operations. The operators must
study the tidal conditions carefully and be intimately familiar with local intertidal
topography and nearshore bathymetry in order to deal effectively with the ever-
changing tidal stages.

       Wind
Winds cause oil slicks to move at a speed equal to about three percent of the wind
speed. Rapidly changing wind directions mean that responders have to attempt to move
booms continually to meet the shifts in the oil's movement, which decreases the
effectiveness of the booms. Wind can also push against the freeboard area of the boom,
possibly causing the boom to tip over or otherwise lose effectiveness.

       Water Depth
Water depth affects the type of response equipment that can be deployed. Many types
of protection strategies use vessels and anchoring systems that require relatively deep
water for operation. However, deep water in high-current areas can create anchoring
problems. Shallow-water areas are usually among the most difficult to protect because
of access restrictions, equipment that is too heavy or big for manual deployment, orI


       Water Volumne
Water volume will be a concern where responders are considering employing dams,
trenches, flow gates, or fixed barriers along rivers and small tidal inlets and creeks.
Larger water flows restrict the number of strategies that may be practical and those


                                           34







               that do work require close monitoring. Planners should also consider sudden changes in
               water volume, such as increased runoff from heavy rainfall.

                       Debris/Broken Ice
               Free-floating debris and ice can clog skimmers, fill up the catchment area behind
               booms, and increase the drag on booms (especially logs). Large amounts of debris or ice
               can change the shape of the boom, making it less effective or causing it to fail.

                   Logitcal Gonstraints
               There are many logistical constraints in the proper and timely deployment of protection
               strategies. They generally fall into the categories of equipment, personnel, training, and

               support.
                       Access
               Sites with limited access may require building roads and using vessels and helicopters to
               transport equipment and workers to the site. Often, limited access requires using an
               alternative protection method. Exceptionally high tides and flood water levels in rivers
               also affect site access. In coastal settings with significant tides, responders need to be
               familiar with high-water levels created by spring and storm tides, and should not rely
               on access routes at elevations below those levels.

                       Bulky and Heavy Equipment
               Much of the equipment used for oil-spill response is bulky and heavy. Movement to a
               deployment site requires large trucks and other material-handling equipment.
               Logistical issues must be carefully thought out to reduce deployment time and decrease
               downtime. The large size of the equipment and common need for deployment in less-
               than-favorable conditions create a high risk of injury. Deployment of such equipment
               may cause further damage to the environment by extensive physical disruption and
               mixing the oil into the sediment, especially in areas without roads or other means of


 I            access. ~Towing of Equipment
               Barriers such as booms are commonly deployed into the water at a convenient location
               and towed to their intended position for the protection strategy. However, many factors
t             ~~~~can affect a vessel's ability to tow a barrier, including water that is too shallow or
               current that is too fast, or unfamiliarity of the crew with the shoreline. Towing the
               barrier requires special boat-handling skills to avoid damage and to ensure proper


                                                          35






positioning. Under optimum operating conditions, boom should not be towed in
sections longer than 1,000 feet. The boom may need to be doubled when longer lengths
must be towed or positioned. Currents, wind, or seas may dictate either shorter lengths
of boom or higher-powered vessels to accomplish the same task.

       Positioning of the Equipment
In order for a protection strategy to work, response equipment must be placed exactly
where planned, in its correct configuration, and where it will require the least amountI
of maintenance. The response team must be well-organized and efficient, especially in
dynamic coastal waters (e.g., with 500-1,500 feet of boom and anchors ready, for
deployment in a one- to three-knot current). Otherwise, the current may move the
boom into an unacceptable position. Repositioning boom is very difficult.

       Equipment Tending
All types of shoreline protection methods require tending to compensate for changing
conditions (e.g., wind, tides, currents, and vessel traffic) and movement of the oil.
Barriers usually do not function properly over long periods of time. Therefore,
responders may have to move equipment around continually to maintain effective
protection.

       Required Personnel
In the initial phases of most spills, there is a finite number of personnel who are trained
spill responders with appropriate operational experience and safety training. The
limited number of personnel immediately available for deploying and operating
equipment mnay limit the method of protection itself, as well as the time required for
deployment.

The larger the spill, the more properly trained personn el and support equipment are
required. Larger spills also take larger management organizations to provide direction.

If a response is t~continue 24 hours per day, two to three times as many personnel willI
be required because of the need to have trained, professional responders available. It is
also necessary to have a pool of trained workers from which relief personnel can be
drawn to prevent burnout and safety lapses.

Another consideration is that 29 CFR 1910.120 requires all employers to provide safety
training for their employees involved in basic response and cleanup. Planning to haved


                                          36








              enough trained personnel available for spills is very difficult and costly, considering the
              unpredictable and episodic demand for such personnel.

                      Equipment Resources
              The amount of equipment available, however, is a known quantity. Equipment can
I         ~       ~~~normally be brought in from another location, but the delay may limit protection
              options because of the time to get the equipment to the spill scene. Because time is
              usually the limiting factor, rather than the actual amount of equipment, response
              organizations cache equipment near potential spill locations. However, there will still
              be delays in placing the equipment in the water and in towing equipment to the
              deployment site.

                      Decontamination of Equipment and Personnel
              All the equipment taken to the spill must be returned and cleaned or disposed of. Thus,
              appropriate decontamination chemicals need to be available. In addition, personnel
              decontamination stations, and clean eating and break areas need to be established and
              maintained.

                      Channel Traffic
              Maintaining shipping or other kinds of vessel traffic through navigation channels or
              waterways during a spill response is a difficult consideration because there are usually
              economic and political pressure to re-establish normal operations as soon as possible.
              However, deploying booms and skimmers or constructing recovery sites can conflict with
              such traffic for several days. Also, passage of deep-draft vessels through the waterway
              can suddenly change water level and flow or create wakes, causing booms to fail.


                      Recovery and Storage Capability
              To lessen the chance of additional oiling, the spilled product must be recovered from the
              water surface as soon as possible. The lack of recovery and storage capability in remote
              areas due to inaccessibility is a difficult problem that requires extensive planning and
              strategy development. Environmental operating conditions (water depth, channel
              width) may require specialized recovery devices and may limit storage capacities.

                      Disposal of Contaminated Materials
              In addition to oiled sediment, water, and vegetation, spills generate a lot of
              contaminated cleanup material, including sorbents, debris, and clothing. Interim
              storage and permanent disposal options have to be defined. Disposal of contaminated


                                                         37







 materials to landfills simply moves the pollution from the shoreline to another site.
 Accordingly, the work plan should include provisions for reducing the volume of
 material to be disposed of in landfills and should address options such as recycling,
 using waste oil in road asphalt, and removing excess liquid from the waste oil.

        Darkness
 In past spills, oil recovery and equipment deployment ceased when darkness fell and
 resumed at first light. Response personnel had to anticipate conditions to be
 encountered the next day. Current trends are towards round-the-clock operations thatI
 require additional logistical consideration for lighting systems and methods to track the

 oil.

        Power
 Power is a consideration for many protection methods. For example, power is needed to
 operate open-water boom reels, lighting systems, air/water systems, overflow dams, flow
 gates, and locks. Should power be lost, the entire operation could be severely curtailed.

        Fuel4
 Fuel is required by boats, tractors, trucks, vehicles, skimmers, and pumps. Fuel shortages
 can limit the effectiveness of the response. Identify in advance adequate vessel, aircraft,
 and equipment refueling stations.



IMatrix of Protection Methods versus Operational Limits
 The matrix in Figure 8 summarizes how a particular protection method will be impacted
 by the operational limitations discussed above. After selecting viable protection
 methods, the planning team should use the matrix to ensure that all considerations and
 impacts are being taken into account. The matrix is particularly useful during site visits
 to verify the protection strategy. Used as a checklist, the matrix provides a general
 overview of the effect of each limitation on response methods when actually deployed.
 Because the matrix represents general guidelines, each case will require careful
 consideration by experienced spill response equipment specialists.

        Note
 The impact ratings assume that each protection method will be employed in the manner
 for which it was designed. For example, shallow-water boom is designed for very
 shallow water, the matrix reflects those limitations typical in shallow-water areas.



                                           38









       Should the boom be used in a deep-water situation, the matrix impact rating
may be inaccurate. The impact ratings are defined as follows:
       Heavy Impact: Planners should review these limitations first to determine
whether they may be overcome through planning. "Heavy" impact does not mean the
method cannot be employed. On the contrary, it m eans that, when correctly planned,
the method will be more effective. At times, heavy impact may require pre-constructing
facilities, pre-staging equipment, or other techniques that will increase the likelihood of
success of the strategy. When pre-planning cannot help the planning group overcome
the limitation, the team should select another approach or use alternative protection
methods.
       Moderate Impact: Often, these impacts do not require advance equipment
mobilizing or pre-construction of special facilities. "Moderate" impact implies that
responders need to be aware of the special limitation and be prepared to carry out the
preplan ned method in its entirety.
       Low Impact: Planners need to identify these impacts for the response
community and ensure that enough quantities of the proper equipment are on hand to
perform the protection method with ongoing operations.
       Not Applicable: This rating indicates that this particular operational limit
should not affect the performance of the protection method when it is employed
appropriately.
























                                          39












      PROTECTION METHO0                       4          /U) U
                   versus                                                              411 4
        OPERATIONAL LIMITO~)                                    4i



                 Open-water~kimm~tig    HL       LH               M            H      M HH            H                    M
        Netting 5ystern                 H L M MM L  L L IL H H  H H  H HH HM H ML  .L
                Sh~~~~~~llow-wa~~~~~~~~~~~er~~~~~ooni  LH    lvi    -   HMM  LM-       -I-LMMML    LMM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-   -> ~ HI

        kInand loorm                    L M  M               M -   M  L M M  L L H MH M M M M M
        Harbor~oom                       MLLLM L                 L    MM       MM      M       H: H   H                M - L
CD Open-water loom                       HKM  L MH I  L    H HMH  H H  H HH H  L H  LM L
            BoEertoom                   ML       M        -      M        - H              L   LLL          - L        M      
        Earthen barrier5                    M   M  M  MH    L  MM    L  H   -- - L   L                             M - L    -M
           Uneftw;Pa                     L                 H - - - H                       M      L         L   -ML    LL
        Overflow Parms                  L   L   H        L   L        H-  H   H   L    -MM    L   L   L   -M    L   L   L

                  Flow~~~~~~a~~~~~s             M-- -                     M       -                M -M              L- L -
        Flowk Lae                                L       -        -   -   L L -   -  -  L   L   - L H- L    L

        Air or Water Strearn5           L        H       H I-L   H   L   - L              M - L    L   L   -       ML    L   L


        Improvioeedl~arricro            L  M   L         L  H   L  H   H   M   L   -L   L  M   H   L   L  H   M - -

      H = HEAVY IMPACT   M =MODERATE IMPACT   L =LOW IMPACT   -= NOT APPLICA13LE

      Figure 8. Matrix showing how protection methods can be impacted by operational limitations and thus require consideration during
               planning activities.







IMatrix of Protection Methods versus Support Equipment
 In planning for protection strategies, Area Committees should think in terms of
 "systems." Protection strategies such as deflection booms, earthen barriers, or open-
 water skimming usually require specific support equipment and logistics. The matrix in
 Figure 9 provides planners with a brief guide to the amount of support equipment
 necessary to support each protection method. Identifying support equipment needs is
 critically important, for two reasons:

 1. Logistically attempting to conduct more activities than a particular site is able to
     handle becomes an ALL STOP scenario during a response. Planners must continually
    keep in mind that a method must be properly and safely carried out. Understanding
    the support equipment required will help planners assess a particular site's
    suitability.

 2. There is always the potential for deployment and maintenance of a selected
    protection method to damage a site physically, even when used properly.

 In Figure 9, support equipment is designated using the following terms:
        Required: In most cases, support equipment will be needed to employ this
 particular protection method effectively. The equipment identified below highlights
 only the major categories of support equipment and may not be inclusive.
        Optional: The identified support equipment is not normally mandated and will
 require careful consideration by the planning group. At times, need for the equipment
 will be dictated by a particular system available through contractors in an area or at
 the decision of the planning group.

        Note
This manual cannot describe support measures for every system in existence. However,
 the matrix does give the planning group the ability to foresee support needs for various
 protection methods. It is clear from the matrix, for example, that larger or more
 mechanized equipment requires more support equipment.








                                           41





            PROTECTION~~~~~~~~~ METO/


 UPPOTETION MEHODST


          versus IMIJn                                                0   )   )qi


           111latia ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -&z C1  3o    z-.                                          00~

   Open-water Ski0mmn               -   RR                       R -0   RO      K0

   Eatettngbrsters                  -   RR       --0             R        0      -           





   HAiror WQater 5tea                             0                  0        0 R  R - -R-    


   Imarovied arriers o                        R      R   -   -   -                         0     

  OvRfo =a                          REQUIRE 0        =  OPTIONAL    - -  0 - 
Figre9.Mtix hwinhesupr eqimn nede fo   th vriu prt cto m e t hods.-







           4DEVELOPING SITE-SPECIFIC PROTECTION STRATEGIES

               Natural Resource Constraints
               There are many site-specific, secondary natural resource constraints on implementing
               and maintaining protection strategies that need to be incorporated into the overall
               protection plan. Secondary natural resource constraints fall into the following
               categories:
                      Minimizing human activity disturbance. Certain animals are very susceptible to
               impacts caused by humans in the immediate vicinity, particularly during nesting or
               pupping periods. For example, birds can abandon eggs or young if the disturbance
               reaches intolerable levels. Therefore, certain areas may be designated as off-limits
               during response or protected with an exclusion zone during the breeding season. Often,
               minimum elevation and distance restrictions are set for aircraft operations; the
               conditions under which these restrictions might be implemented should be identified in
              the plan. For example, vessel traffic can be excluded from sensitive areas or restricted to
               specific corridors through sensitive areas. The normal periods during which such
               restrictions might be enforced should also be specified.
                  CesMinimizing physical disturbances while implementing protection strategies.
                  Cesdeploying and maintaining protection methods can physically disrupt shoreline
              and nearshore habitats during activities such as setting and repositioning anchor points,
               particularly when they are placed onshore; digging into sediments to excavate dikes or
              trenches; and transiting to and from sites in shallow water where the motor prop can
              cut into benthic habitats such as seagrass beds. Even foot traffic around soft-sediment
              sites can trample vegetation and mix oil into the substrate, increasing the impact to the
I         ~~~~habitat. Site-specific restrictions should be included in the protection plan.
                      Controlling access to and release of information about the location and nature of
               sites likely to be affected by increased public recognition, in terms of vandalism or
               poaching. Many agencies are concerned about the publication of information on some
               resources, such as archaeological sites, eagle or peregrine falcon nests, and endangered
              plandals. Theccause is therdsgationuin publicato plans oresulring inreaeovstection acivtis
              plandalsm beaue cofnceirn designationuch publicato plans oresurting pnrecsdvsttion acivtis
              Such areas can be flagged without indicating their exact location and nature of
              concern. Workers must receive strict instructions not to disturb readily recognized
              archaeological or cultural resources (e.g., fossils and artifacts). Some sites will be
              sensitive enough to require the presence of a monitor during all response activities to
              prevent either inadvertent or deliberate damage to particular resources.

                                                         43







       General types of natural resource restraints. There are many general types of
constraints on access and activities that should be included in the plan. Examples
include restricting access to sensitive habitats to minimize trampling of vegetation, tide
pool fauna, or particularly rich intertidal communities; restricting physical disturbance
of the stream bottom in spawning reaches of streams; and using low water pressures in
areas of fine-grained sediments to minimize erosion and high suspended sediment loads.




General Shoreline Protection Tactics

   Boomning Tackis
Figures 10-1 1 show common tactics for containment, deflection, and exclusion
booming. These tactics are the building blocks for developing protection strategies.
Guidelines for successfully deploying these tactics are summarized for each figure.

       Containment Booming
The key to successful containment booming is understanding current speed and
direction, and how they change over time, so that the effective current at the boom does
not exceed 0.7 knots. Figure 10 shows two types of containment booming.


I . Teardrop or Donut (Figure IlOa)
*  Often used in areas with very strong currents and deep water, which make holding 
   the oil in place nearly impossible.
*  Thick slicks are collected and enclosed in boom, which drifts with the currents.
*  Skimmers go to the contained oil to recover the oil as it drifts.
ï¿½  To collect the oil in shallow water, it may be necessary to corral the oil and bring it
   to deeper water or low-current areas with better skimmer access.


2. Ship Containment (Figure l0b)
  *When anchoring boom around the ship, leave space between the two for oil
   accumulation.
  * Multiple anchors improve the holding capacity and the configuration of the boom;
   boom pushed against the hull will be completely ineffective.
ï¿½  The bow of an anchored ship will face into the prevailing wind or current and shift
   accordingly. Booming must account for vessel swing.
*  Large lengths of boom (2,000-5,000 feet) are often required for ship containment.


                                          44







* Boat/manpower-intensive; requires highly skilled personnel. Access/egress to ship
    must be coordinated.


Containment Booming






                          BOOM




           a    donut                                 b   ship conitainment

Figure 10. Examples of containment booming configurations.

        Deflection and Exclusion Booming
Deflection booming requires exact placement and securing. The most common failures
result from placing boom at the wrong angle for the current speed and improper
anchoring so that the boom sags and a pocket forms. The pocket orients perpendicular
to the flow at the point of highest current speeds, and usually results in boom failure by
entrainment.


Exclusion booming is effective only where the currents are relatively weak, otherwise
entrainment under the boom is likely. Even so, deflection booming can be added as a
backup in come cases. Multiple booms should be used to ensure effectiveness. It is
imperative that the boom is well sealed to the shoreline to prevent leakage. Figure 11
shows examples of deflection and exclusion booming.


I. Cascade to Collection Points (Figure II a)
ï¿½ Used to deflect oil from areas of strong currents, such as the center of channels,
    toward an area of weaker currents for enhanced recovery.
ï¿½  High currents require small angles and, thus, long boom lengths. To reduce the
    strain on the longitudinal member, use shorter lengths in an overlapping
    configuration.
*  There must be adequate overlap between boom sections.
ï¿½  Use multiple anchors to handle heavy strains in strong currents.


                                          45







ï¿½  Anchoring points, collection sites, and boom configuration will change with shifts in
   tidal current and wind directions, and so must be regularly tended.
ï¿½  Use two to three booms to collect oil that is entraining under upstream booms.
ï¿½  Sites for collection along the shore must have access for personnel and equipment.
   These collection sites should have impermeable substrates to minimize the extent of
   site contamination.
*  Create or find collection points (trenches) to speed removal of accumulated oil from
   the water surface.

2. Chevron (Figure  I Ib)4
ï¿½  The boom is anchored in the middle of the channel, with the oil deflected towards
   recovery sites on both banks.
*  This tactic allows the smallest boom angle in the center, where the currents are
   highest, and deflection to shore where currents are low.

ï¿½  Use chevron booming where the current flows only in one direction.
3. Deflection (Figure I I cid)
ï¿½  Used to deflect oil away from a sensitive area without attempting recovery because
   of inadequate access, high currents, or other limitations.
*  Can be used to exclude even gasoline from sensitive areas or ignition sources.
*  Under tidal conditions, the oil might approach from opposite directions because of
   reversals of tidal current flow, requiring complex deployments and anchoring.
*  Plans need to include eventual recovery of the oil.

4. Exclusion (Figure I I c/d)
*  Need to maintain a tight configuration against the shoreline.I
*  There should be no sagging in the boom to prevent pocket formation.
ï¿½  Used in marinas, harbors, and canals where currents at the entrance are very weak.
ï¿½ Riprap structures may be permeable to oil and thus may need to be lined.
ï¿½  With narrow entrances and good access, multiple booms are usually deployed to
   improve success.










                                         46








a   Cascadeto collection points                               b  Chevron




              PRIMA13P                               OE PON




                     00  ~~ RECOVERYPON
                                                                                   RECOERYPOINTS


    OIL MOVEMENT                                       /                              VE\\
                                                                           PRIMARY     SECONDARY







            -a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!




c/d Combination of exclusion and deflection

                                                                WEAK
    CURRENT                                                CURRENT













 Figure 11. Examples of deflection and exclusion booming configurations.







IOverview of Oil Recovery Methods
 Recovering oil on the water is limited to skimmers, sorbents, and manual recovery.
 Recovering floating oil would appear to be an easy task: oil floats on water so all that isI
 required is a means to gather the floating oil. In fact, recovering floating oil is one of
the most difficult operations to perform. Effective recovery leaves less oil to be
deposited on the shoreline. Skimming oil off the water surface frequently collects large
amounts of water, which increases the volume of product to handle. Skimmers may
operate independently, be mounted on vessels, or may be completely self-propelled.
Skimmers are classified in five different categories: weir, suction, centrifugal,
submersion, and sorbent or oleophilic skimmers.

Key factors in selecting appropriate skimmers are the amount of debris present, the
viscosity of the oil, and the water depth. Figure 12 is a skimmer selection and
employment checklist. Area Committees should match up skimmer requirements with
their proposed protection strategies and work with response organizations to determine
whether their equipment and capabilities are adequate to meet protection requirements.


Sorbents are not primary oil cleanup techniques but are used mainly during final
cleanup or when small or trace amounts are being removed. They are used in areas that
are inaccessible to skimmers and where heavy equipment may cause excessive damage.
Sorbents are measured by how much oil they will recover in weight compared to the
weight of the material. The most efficient sorbent can sorb nearly 20-25 times its
weight in oil. Overuse of sorbents can generate a large disposal problem because most
used sorbent material is placed in landfills, although some areas have approved
incineration. Recycling of sorbents should be done whenever possible.

Manual recovery involves using hand equipment to recover oil, primarily with rakes and
shovels to lift tarballs or tarmats from the substrate or water surface. Heavy or
weathered oil can sometimes be recovered by hand, depending on its viscosity. The
recovered oil is bagged for later disposal. Manual removal is not considered a primary
means of removing oil from the water and it is used most often in shoreline cleanup.








                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~48









SKIMMER SELECTION AND EMPLOYMENT CHECKLIST

1. Amount of oil to recover
     LI   Correct number of skimming systems
     -I  Logistics to support each additional skimming system
     _. Thickness of the oil

2. Type of oil to recover
     U    Product viscosity
     U   Weathering
     LI  Emulsification
     Li   Sheens versus heavy oil concentrations
     U    Contamination with spill response chemicals

3. Debris
    LI  Size - clogs skimmer head and pumps
    U   Type - paper, wood, trash, and brush
    El   Amount

4. Water depth
    L   Skimmer underwater profile
    L    Floating skimmer
    LI  Anchoring system
    L    Changes in water depth

5. Collected water
    L    Sufficient holding capacity/interim storage
    LI   Decanting capability
    LI   Reducing the collection through more efficient oil containment

6. Current
    LI Velocity
    Li   Direction (does the direction change?)
    L   Cross-currents
    LI   Heavy impact on skimmer maneuverability

7. Logistics
    L   Skimmer location
    Li  Transportation arrangements
    LI   Skimmer contractual arrangements
    L    Fuel
    L    Nighttime operational requirements

8. Heavy equipment
    Li   Cranes/forklifts
    LI  Vessels/boats
    LI   Equipment contractual arrangements
    LI   Location

9. Skimmer size
    LI   Location suitable for small or large skimmer
    Li   Personnel handling requirements
    L    Physical ability to get skimmer from storage area to the site

Figure 12.         Checklist for selecting and deploying skimming systems.






                                                  49








10. Wind
    U   Velocity - high or low, moves the oil and the skimmer
    Li  Direction - will the direction change on location?
    r. Creates wave action detrimental to skimming

11. Maneuvering skimmer
    LJ  Self-propelled skimmers need room to maneuver
    Li  Non-self-propelled skimmers need to be maneuvered into the oil
    .. Changing anchoring positions

12. Qualified operators
    [] Past oil spill experience
    Li  Local availability
    Li  Time to arrive on scene
    LI  Area familiarization

13. Shoreline type
    L   Sand, mud, gravel, rock, or cliffs
    LI  Ability to support skimmer operational needs
    LI   Damage to associated shoreline from response personnel

14. Containment efficiency
    LI Maximum efficiency with thick oil contained in a barrier
    LI   Reduce the water intake
    L   Other limitations impact efficiency

15. Access
    LI  Roadways available to site
    LI  Helicopter sling-loading required
    LI  Boatiship access only
    LI  Building or construction required for access
    LI  To temporary storage device
    L   To shoreside discharge location with recovered oil



Figure 12., cont.

       The skimmer selection and employment checklist should be used during field
       verification. After areas have been examined and equipment requirements laid
       out, various spill scenarios can be used to determine whether a particular
       skimmer will work in a given situation.



Alternative Protection Methods
Because of the many operational, logistical, and environmental limitations, mechanical
methods cannot protect all sensitive shorelines. In those areas where these methods do
not work, the only alternatives will be taking no action at all or using non-mechanical
methods that are usually implemented away from the shore in open water. All chemical
countermeasures require RRT consultation.





                                               50








    Chemical Dispersants
Chemical dispersants are specially formulated compounds designed to reduce the oil-
water interfacial tension and allow the oil to break into small droplets that mix into the
water column. Dispersants are normally used in offshore waters to prevent oil from
moving into sensitive environments. They may work when other protection strategies
are most likely to fail, that is, in conditions of strong currents and high waves.
Dispersant application by aerial spraying is limited by high winds, fog, and darkness.
Effectiveness drops rapidly with time after the initial release of the oil. The tradeoffs
between increasing oil concentration in the water column and removing oil from
surface water will have to be evaluated.

    Herding Agents
Herding agents are products that push or compress oil slicks on the water surface. They
have low solubility and volatility, and must have a spreading pressure greater than the
target oil. Application rates are very low (1-15 gallons per lineal mile). They are most
effective on thin films and low-viscosity oils. Weather and sea conditions must be calm,
with no breaking waves, low currents, and no rainfall. Their optimal use may be in
harbors to control slicks under docks and piers and in water too shallow for booms.
Commercially available products vary widely in their aquatic toxicity.

    Sdidifiers
Solidifiers are usually organic polymers that mix with oil and turn it into a rubber-like
solid or gel. The most limiting factor is the amount of product needed to solidify a
given volume of oil; current solidifiers require application rates of 1 to 200 percent. The
solidifier must be mixed into the oil, making it more difficult to treat emulsified, thick,
or heavy oils. There is also concern about inconsistent application rates and resulting
areas of liquid, semi-solid, and solid oil. Available products are insoluble and have very
low aquatic toxicity, thus the greatest environmental concern will be the ability to
recover the solidified- oil from the water surface.

    Shoreline Pre-Treatrnent Agents
These products prevent oil from adhering to a shoreline. There are two sub-classes:
film-forming agents and wetting agents. However, currently there are no commercially
available products for oil-spill applications. There would be concern about contact
toxicity and smothering since these products would be applied directly on clean
substrates. This category does not include products that are dispersants.



                                           51







   Burning
Burning spilled oil produces the highest potential rate of oil removal. Whether the oil is
burning due to the casualty or being ignited in situ, the results are worth considering.
Oil must be a minimum of two millimeters thick to maintain a burn on the water
surface. Otherwise, the cooling effects of the water below will extinguish the flame. The
tradeoff between creating an air plume of soot and combustion by-products and
leaving the oil on the water surface needs to be evaluated.

   Hazing
Hazing is the intentional use of mechanical devices to generate loud noises to prevent
wildlife from coming in contact with floating or stranded oil. However, the devices have
a very limited period of effectiveness because wildlife quickly acclimate to them. Hazing
should be coordinated with local fish and wildlife representatives to ensure that greater
harm is not being done to animals than would happen with no action. In addition,
responders must be aware of the chance that they could actually haze animals away
from their habitat and into another oiled area.

   Operadomal Rewtictcins and Modifcalicvs
Altering vessel patterns and operational procedures may be a viable option to reduce
risk to environmental areas that cannot be adequately protected with mechanical
means. This can be achieved through local councils, port safety committees, and
international agencies, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO). These
efforts could include traffic rerouting, establishing exclusion zones, modifying or
restricting operational procedures (such as requiring booms), limiting bunkering during
seasonal coral spawning, and requiring pilots and tugboats to guide vessels into port in
high-risk areas.

   Permanent Structures
Permanent structures are intended as preventive measures to eliminate or reduce the
impact of a spill in advance of the actual incident. Some structures could be staging
areas for response equipment deployment, some for isolating the potential source, and
others for isolating the sensitive area to be protected. These structures might include
permanent booms at piers, permanent boom anchor points and rollout mounted booms,
and tide gates or permanent barriers erected around a potential spill source.

   No Action
No action should be considered when the response is likely to cause more injury to the
resource than would the oil alone. An example would be a marine mammal pupping


                                          52








 area where any physical disturbance might either drive the animals into the water (and
 the oil) or cause the mothers to abandon the young.


IProtection Methods for Specific Physical Settings
 Determining the most effective protection methods for a particular setting may not
 relate directly to either the presence of sensitive resources or the priority of the area.
 Rather, it may depend on the physical setting of the sensitive area. For example, the
 sensitive resource being protected could easily be a nesting endangered species or a
 public swimming beach. However, if both are located on open exposed beaches the
 options are limited to those technologies available for protection of open exposed
 beaches. Below are brief general descriptions and guidelines for selecting protection
 strategies for the thirteen physical settings listed. These same settings are used in the
 protection methods versus physical setting matrix in Figure 13. Feasible protection
 methods are indicated, either as viable or conditional, for each physical setting. Viable
 methods are those most likely to be effective under normal physical conditions at a site.
 Conditional methods are those that may be effective under optimum conditions but
 site-specific constraints may render the method ineffective or cause more harm than the
 anticipated benefit. Dashes indicate methods that are not applicable to that physical
 setting. Figure 13 is not a cookbook, it is intended to provide planners a starting
 position when considering protection methods.

    Open Wate
 Open-water habitats include offshore areas along the coastline, the Great Lakes, and
 large bays. They are characterized by frequent high waves, moderate currents, and deep
 water. The water surface itself may have sensitive resources such as large flocks of
 waterfowl, concentrations of marine mammals, and kelp beds. Feasible protection
 methods include open-water skimming, netting, and booming.

 * Open-water skimming is most effective on thick oil early in the spill before the oil
    spreads into thin slicks and over large areas.
 0 Responders should take full advantage of natural convergence zones where the oil
    tends to concentrate, even large distances from the source. Some convergence zones
    are quite stable and form in the same location, whereas others are more variable
    due to changing tidal and wind conditions.

  *Aerial observations are essential to direct skimmers.




                                           53








Often, mechanical protection is not possible because of high waves, strong currents, or a
spilled product that rapidly evaporates or naturally disperses. Thus, alternative
protection methods may need to be considered, such as in-situ burning and dispersants.
Otherwise, no action is the only alternative.

   Open Exposed Shorelines
Open exposed shorelines occur along the outer coast and the Great Lakes where there is
sufficient fetch to generate large waves. The shoreline may be composed of sand, gravel, 
rock, seawalls, or a combination of types. These areas might have high priority for
protection because of the presence of large marine mammal haulouts or seabird nesting
sites. Feasible protection methods include open-water skimming, netting, booming,
earthen barriers, and trenches.

*  Where there are large waves and strong currents, deploying boom in the nearshore
   zone will not keep oil off the shore.
ï¿½  In less exposed areas, such as on lakes or during periods of relative calm water, wave
   heights may be small enough to use deflection boom anchored to the shoreline to
   deflect oil onto sandy beaches where it can be recovered.
*  Earthen berms can provide very temporary protection for resources at or above the
    high-tide line on exposed beaches, such as turtle nests; however, the berm is likely to
   be eroded by waves during the next period of significant wave activity.
*  Trenches may be possible on sandy substrates to trap or direct large amounts of oil
    heading toward sensitive areas when there are no other oil recovery options.
*  No action is the only option when physical conditions render protection ineffective.
   Alternatives to reducing the amount of oil coming ashore include in-situ burning
   and dispersants.

















                                           54








                                          Oil Recovery   Floating Barriers     5oici Barriers       Other


   PROTECTiON METHOP3
              verouo
     PHY5ICALSOETTNG




  Open. Exposed Shoreline               V   C  - -C  V   -C   --C   -- 
    hrcd hOrelti                       C   CC:,;   V   C                          V     -      C
  Rivers an&; lbanks                        -  V   V   C   --C --C -C - -  C


  Salt Water Marshes and Greek Mouths o         V   C --  C   V   C  C   C  C   ---V
   tFr h Waerzmarlhm  a5~ndi watp                                                                   10I -                        
  Tidal Inlets                               -  V  C   C   --C - - -- -- - -





  Sancl/~MUd FlatO                      C   -  V   C        C -     C   -- --                      


V =VIA13LE METHOD   C =CONDITIONAL METHOD   -=NOT APPLICA13LE

Figure 13. Matrix showing viable protection methods for various physical settings.







    Sheltered Shorelines
Sheltered shorelines occur on the inside of barrier islands, in bays and estuaries, or along
lakes and rivers. The substrate can range from mud to sand to bedrock. Sheltered
shorelines do not have large fetches of open water for waves to build across, although
water currents can be locally strong. Nearshore water depths are variable. The
sheltered character of the shoreline may vary seasonally with storm wind patterns.
Feasible protection methods include open-water skimming, netting, booming, trenches
and earthen barriers on beaches, flow gates, improvised barriers, and bubble barriers.

ï¿½  Shoreline access is often a problem, from both land and water.
*  Large areas will require many sections of boom, which can be difficult to deploy and
   maintain in proper configuration.

   Riwj3r and Banks
Rivers are characterized by high-flow channels and river banks typically composed of
muddy, organic-rich sediments. Terrestrial vegetation containing threatened and
endangered species, and wildlife use by birds and terrestrial mammals, make rivers
potential areas for priority protection. Rivers pose a very difficult situation to
responders because of high flow rates in the channel, turbulent mixing, and heavy debris
loads. Furthermore, many rivers flood several times a year, drastically changing the
physical characteristics of the river as well as the location of possible sensitive areas.
Such seasonal water-level changes must be considered and incorporated into the plan.
Feasible protection methods include skimming, booming, earthen barriers, locks, trenches
(with boomns), and improvised barriers.

*  Deflection booming away from high-flow areas to low-flow areas is the most
   efficient countermeasure.
ï¿½  Take advantage of natural collection points where the oil tends to accumulate
   anyway.
*  Shore-based access is often limited; sites need to be identified that have access and
   where recovery operations can be established.
ï¿½'Clay banks are preferred containment sites because the clay minimizes sediment
   contamination during recovery operations.
*  Use trenches to divert oil off the water surface to recovery equipment.
ï¿½  Plan for large amounts of debris in the river and in collection sites.



                                           56








               *  Use lines tied to banks on smaller rivers, rather than anchors to secure boom; line
                   allows better control of boom and angle.
               *  Air or water streams can be used to direct oil toward collection and recovery sites.
               a Use the shortest skirted booms possible where currents are strong.

                   Entrances
               Entrances connect semi-enclosed water bodies to larger tidal waterbodies such as an
               ocean, bay, or estuary. They are characterized by reversing tidal currents, large open
               areas with complicated water-circulation patterns, and highly variable water depths
i           ~     ~~~ranging from intertidal shoals to deep channels. These areas can be sensitive themselves
               because of the presence of waterfowl, or they can lead to more sensitive, sheltered
               habitats. Feasible protection methods include open-water skimming, netting, booming,
               and digging trenches on shore. Alternative strategies include in-situ burning and using
               dispersants in deep water. The complexity of these areas often requires equally complex
               booming strategies devised for the specific sites and refined through field testing.

                   Saltwate Marsh Creek Mouths
               Saltwater marsh creeks typically have muddy banks that are exposed during low tide;
               water floods into the vegetation at high tide. Tidal channels can be numerous in
               extensive marshes, and they are the focus of protection because they lead to extensive
               sheltered marshes where oil persistence and impacts are greatest. The larger creek
               channels can have surprisingly strong tidal currents. Feasible protection methods
               include various types of deflection and exclusion booming, depending on tidal current
               velocities, earthen barriers, overflow and underflow dams, flow gates, and improvised
               barriers.


               * The soft, muddy substrate may cause anchor points to fail-, visit the site to verify the
                  best anchoring locatioris.
               * It may be difficult to seal the boom to the shore to prevent leakage at high tide;
                  response personnel may have to go a long distance to find a good anchor point.
               * With potentially lonyg distances, boom handling and deploying is often a serious
                  problem.
               * Constantly alternating tidal currents and water levels in coastal settings require
                  regular tending of boom.
               a Earthen barriers (use sandbags if sand is available) can often fail because of strong
                  tidal currents.


                                                          57








ï¿½ Earthen barriers may require water circulation to maintain water temperature and
   dissolved oxygen at specified levels.
ï¿½ Sorbent boom can be used to protect vegetati on from thin sheens.
ï¿½ Deflection to collection points is likely to fail in large channels with strong tidal flow
   where exclusion or deflection is the lone preventive method.
* Physical disturbance to the substrate by foot traffic can be severe.

    Freshwater Marshes and Swamps
Freshwater marshes and swamps are flat, vegetated areas of standing water with few
well-defined channels. Marshes are vegetated wetlands dominated by grasses; swamps
are dominated by woody vegetation. Water levels vary seasonally with freshwater
discharge; those near the coast may be under some tidal influence. A special type of
freshwater swamp includes backwater lakes that occur along major rivers and are
isolated from the main current but still hydrologically connected to the river at higher
water levels. Connecting channels can be narrow, shallow, numerous, and poorly
defined. Feasible protection methods include booming, earthen barriers, underflow
dams, trenches, and improvised barriers.


ï¿½ Deflection/exclusion booming can be effective because currents are typically slow.
*  Consider the potential for reversing water flow directions during flooding
    conditions.
*  It may be difficult to close all connections along rivers when water levels are high or
    under flooding conditions.
ï¿½  Slow water currents may require air and water streams to push oil flow toward
   collection and recovery sites.
*  Access is often difficult and limits use of recovery equipment.
*  Expect large amounts of debris to accumulate.
*  When barriers are used, water quality should be monitored.'
*  Physical disturbance to the substrate by foot traffic can be severe.

    Tidal Inleft
Tidal inlets are narrow channels connecting the open ocean to interior bays and
wetlands that are subject to reversing tidal currents. The inlet size and current rates are
controlled by the volume of water, called the tidal prism, that flows in and out of the
inlet during a tidal cycle. In the main inlet channel, the currents often reach one to two
knots during some stage of the tidal cycle. Some inlets have maximum currents of three








or more knots, rendering boom ineffective in the main channel. There may also be
multiple channels. Inside the tidal inlet, wetlands and tidal flats dominate, making it
difficult to locate appropriate sites for oil containment and recovery. Feasible
protection methods include open-water skimming in the deeper channels, booming
tactics where the currents are slower, and sediment barriers where the inlets are small
and freshwater flow rates are very low.


*  Place deflection boom at low angles to the flow to minimize entrainment; use
    multiple sections of boom rather than long sections.
*  Responders may need to deploy booms landward of the main inlet channel where
    current velocities drop.
0  Locate sandy substrates with good access as sites for oil deflection and recovery.
*  Small inlets with minimal freshwater outflow may be effectively closed with a
   sediment barrier; monitor water quality.
a Protecting very difficult inlets requires delineating primary, secondary, and tertiary
    lines of defense.
0  Because inlets can change shape and location rapidly, strategies may need to be
    modified at the time of the spill.

   Intermittent Greeks
Intermittent creeks are characterized by a shallow stream bed that can completely dry
up seasonally. The sediments are often composed of sand or gravel. Feasible protection
methods include booming, earthen barriers, underflow and overflow dams, trenches,
flow gates, and improvised barriers. Strategy selection will depend on the presence or
absence of water flow.


*  Place barriers diagonally across the creek rather than perpendicular to the bank.
*  In a dry stream bed with gravelly sediments, trapped oil can penetrate deeply into
   the gravel (up to tens of feet).
0  Watch for rapid changes in stream flow that can wash out dams and barriers.

   Streams
Streams always have running water in the channel or bed, although the flow rates can
vary seasonally. The banks can be steep or flat and are often natural and composed of
riparian vegetation, rather than manmade materials such as seawalls and riprap.




                                          59








Feasible protection methods include booming tactics, earthen barriers, overflow and
underflow dams, trenches, and improvised barriers.

*  Response will be driven by location of access points, such as at bridges or parks.
*  Containment will be most effective where the slope is gentler and the flow rates
   slower.
ï¿½  Take care to minimize contamination of stream-side sediments.

    Vegetted Shorelines
Many embayments and other sheltered areas have large areas of vegetated shoreline.
The vegetation can be fresh- and saltwater marshes, mangrove swamps, or low banks of
terrestrial vegetation. The nearshore areas are usually shallow, limiting access for
booming or other protective methods. Booming is the only feasible protection method.


*   Responders should take extreme care to avoid trampling vegetation/substrate.
*   In tidal settings, a combination of both shallow-water and inland booms may be
   needed.

   Sand/Mud Rlas
These flats consist of accumulations of sand or mud that are exposed at low water levels
and completely submerged during high water levels. They occur at the mouths of tidal
inlets and next to many shoreline types in bays and estuaries. Sandy flats usually
indicate strong tidal currents and/or wave activity; however, muddy flats do not always
indicate weak currents. Booming is the only feasible protection method.


*  Shallow water and shoreline access are major operational limitations.
ï¿½   Responders may need a combination of both shallow-water and inland booms,
   especially where waves may cause entrainment.

   Submerged Habtats and Resources
Submerged habitats include all areas below low-low water level, sensitive habitats such
as submerged aquatic vegetation and coral reefs, and human-use resources such as
water intakes and fish pens. These areas are extremely difficult to protect because of
their open nature. Most water intakes should have an internal contingency plan that
includes water-quality monitoring, closure when slicks are near the intakes, temporary




                                          60








 alternate sources of water, and increased carbon filtration of the raw water. Feasible
 protection methods include open-water skimming, booming, and improvising barriers.


 * Booms are only effective where wave heights are small and water depths are
     appropriate for anchoring.
 o Responders may need to give special consideration to heavy oils or oil mixed into the
     water column attached to debris or sediments.


ISteps for Developing Site-Specific Protection Strategies
 When developing Appendix V, Sensitive Areas, Area Committees complete two very
 important components of the area plan: identifying sensitive areas and developing
 specific response strategies to protect these sensitive areas. Developing the site-specific
 protection strategies is another iterative process as the committee evaluates the
 feasibility of various strategies. Before working on the strategies, the committee should
 have identified and initially prioritized sensitive resources (see Chapter 2). All priority
 areas should be listed in tabular form and pinpointed on work maps. The committee
 should have compiled available information on the physical and environmental
 conditions on each site.


 The process can be divided into a series of steps.


 Step 1. Identify the following information for each site:


 * Nautical charts, for water depths, bathymetry, and navigation information
 * Topographic maps, for access points, topography, and demographics
 0 Water velocities, average and maximum
 * Average and storm wave heights and direction
 * Tidal range, for neap and spring tides
 * Seasonal changes in water levels
 0 Shoreline types
 a Lists of sensitive resources present
 0 Potential spill sources


Step 2. Summarize the resources being protected at the site. For example, a priority site
 is an extensive marsh system that is connected by a series of channels to an open bay.
Channels are the primary conduit for an oil spill in the bay to enter the marsh during all


                                           61








but extreme water levels. Protect the marsh by focusing on preventing oil from entering
the channels during flood tide.


Step 3. Determine the physical setting of the actual protection site. In this example, it
is a saltwater marsh creek mouth.


Step 4. Using the matrix for weighing viable protection methods versus physical setting,
list the "recommended" and "conditional" protection methods for the site. For saltwater
creek mouths, consider using shallow-water boom and earthen barriers.


Step 5. Evaluate the feasibility of employing each listed method at the site. Use the
matrices on operational limits (Figure 8) and support equipment (Figure 9) for each
method and recovery device, as well as the available information on site conditions and
resources. Consider each of the limitations for the specific site, realizing that many
decisions are made based not on information from a report, but on the knowledge,
experience, and judgment of the committee members. Thus, it is very important to have
resource and response community members present. Select the most appropriate
protection method or combination of methods. If no mechanical actions are feasible,
then consider alternative protection strategies.4


Step 6. Develop the full, site-specific response strategy. Describe the strategy in detail
so that the committee's intent is very clear. Include specific actions to follow or avoid.
For example, if diversion booming is recommended, specify collection points. If special
conditions at the site were noted during the evaluation, they should be included here so
that responders implementing the strategy can benefit from the work of the committee.


Step 7. Field-verify and revise the protection strategy through site visits. Each priority
site should be visited to determine that the site is properly located on maps and
classified, the proposed protection strategy is feasible, and that access and anchor
points are properly located. Figure 14 is a suggested checklist of actions to be
completed during the site visit. It is likely that, for some high-priority sites, the only
possible protection strategies will be deemed to be of low feasibility during field
verification. The committee will have to consider alternative methods and/or prevention
strategies for these sites. Field verification of each site does not have to be completed
prior to submitting the Area Plan, but key sites (those of highest priority and the most
questionable protection strategies) should be visited within the first year, and


                                           62








subsequent sites visited within the first five years. It is important to verify the plans at
different conditions of tide, water level, discharge rates, etc.


Step 8. Submit the protection strategies to the Area Committee for approval, both for
an individual site or updates to sub-areas. The final products are:


1. Feasible protection strategy for priority sites;
2. Alternative approaches for low-feasibility sites, and
3. Consideration of alternative protection methods.


Formats for presentation of these products are described in Section S.







































                                            63








FIELD VERIFICATION CHECKLIST



       Site Name                                       Site No. ____Date

       Survey Team Members

                   El  Is the site properly located on the map?

                   El  Has the name of the site changed?

                   El Verify latitudellongitude if GPS is available.

               El     Are the physical settings of the site correct?

                   El Are all the shoreline types listed?

                   El Verify presence of sensitive resources listed for the season of the visit.

                   El Are other sensitive resources present?

               El     Evaluate whether the protection strategy is appropriate.
                        * Check feet of boom needed for currents and width at the site.
                        * Are the anchor points accessible at high/low tide or water levels; will4
                          they hold?
                        * Is water depth compatible with protection strategy?
                        * Are natural collection sites identified?

                   ElWhat logistics are available on-site?

               El     Verify the possible staging areas. Are the directions correct?

               El     Verify the possible access points. Are the directions correct?

               El     Verify operational response limitations.

               El     Verify resource protection limitations.


       Figure 14. Checklist of actions to be completed during field-verification visits to
                   priority protection sites. The checklist should be used with the site summary
                   sheet and map of the site from the area plan.





                                                  64








5 PREPARING WORK PRODUCTS FOR AREA PLANS


      IPresentation of Work Products
       The Coast Guard guidance for identifying sensitive areas in Appendix V, Annex E of the
       Area Contingency Plan specifies that sensitive areas be mapped out with as much detail
       as possible using the information from sensitivity and protection strategies. The plan
       should include the following information, at a minimum:


       * Maps showing the location of the prioritized areas;
       9 Summary sheets that describe each area (both sensitive resources and protection
           strategies);
       0 Detailed sketches of priority sites showing site-specific information on protection
           method, access, anchor points, location of sand bars, etc.


       Each of these types of information is discussed in the following section.

          Maps affensiti'w Areas
       Maps show both the location of sensitive areas and their priority. The most cost-
       effective maps are black-and-white, page-sized (8.5 x 1 1 inches). Color and larger-
       format maps are more readable, but are not widely used because of the initial cost of
       reproduction and the difficulty of rapidly reproducing or transmitting them with
       standard office equipment, such as photocopiers and facsimile machines.


       If possible, maps at various scales should be used to display the information in the plan
       most effectively. Two types of maps should be considered: location maps and protection
       priorities maps. You need a location map of the entire area or region covered by the
       plan to show the area of concern, the division of any sub-areas, and the location of
       more detailed maps. Figure 15 shows a sample map containing all of the necessary
       information on a location map:


       o The boundaries of the area covered by the plan;
       * Location of the area map on a state map',
       * Map scale and north arrow;
       0 Map source; and
       * Area covered and key for more detailed maps



                                                65















based on 
NOAA Chart No. 11524
          Nautical Miles  
        EPo o.                                                                    . , . ~   
                                      14



                                   17-1\





              Figure 15. Sample location map showing the necessary information.















                      20         :0!r--66
      t; :: ' rS~~~~~~~~~~6








Protection priorities maps show the location of priority protection areas. Use standard
base maps, such as NOAA charts or U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps, because
they are commonly used by response agencies and provide detail missing on other maps.
Also, shoreline and other types of information are distributed in digital format for these
maps, which the Area Committee can use with readily available mapping software to
generate their own computer maps. If the Committee decides that the base maps will be
the original 1:24,000-scale USGS topographic map (7.5-minute quadrangle), but
reduced to page size, the scale of the reduced map becomes 1 :64,800 when the map is
8.5 x 1 1 inches, and about 1:80,000 when room for a legend is added. If this scale is not
appropriate, it may be better not to reduce the whole map to page size, but instead cut
the original map into page-sized sheets. The objective is to keep the area covered by the
map or the map scale tied to a recognizable format, because computer-generated maps
will necessarily lack much of the detail shown on printed maps. The response plan maps
should have:


*  Map name and number;
0  Map base (and computer file name if in digital format);
*  Latitudellongitude tick marks;
0  Scale (e.g., 1:24,000) and distance ruler;
0  Date published by the Area Committee (to facilitate updating);
o  Legend for all symbology used on the map; and
*  North arrow.


The protection priorities maps should be kept relatively simple and emphasize the
location and priority of the protection priority areas (Figure 16 is a sample map).
Shoreline sensitivity or the distribution of sensitive resources should not be included on
these maps. Each priority area should be marked with a symbol and unique code that is
linked to tables or summary sheets with detailed information (discussed in the next
section). The symbol indicates the protection priority. The priority area code includes an
identification number; the priority should be included in the code (e.g., Al12 represents
an "A" priority site with identification number 12). The map provides a visual summary
of the areas requiring protection and their priority. They do not provide detailed
information on specific protection configurations.






                                          67





                                       4   Highest protection priority   Boom
                                       A27
  COTP  Savannah                        #         Protect after A areas    A  Skimmer
                                       B26
                                        M  Protect after B areas
  Map 4                                      C25
  prepared by NOAA                            /   Collection Point

                                          "  Boat Ramp





                         tt A13 Chishol


                                      -XaS"r  \Island



                                                                                  veI
Z                                     A2 : nV e Ar 






                         ds :                      1/7,---




                                   0   10  00 30:0                         :V0 60Broomfield
                            xO Portd.~ :   X                   ,;          :  X;;    Creek        0 f


















                               "0           "000 300 00














                                            68
                     0810 45'                       :                      0810 40; W
                                          (Scale: 1/80,000)
                               0    1000         3000               6000





                                             68                           ;







    Site Summary Sheet
Site summary sheets contain text descriptions of sensitive resources and response
strategies. Figure 1 7 is a sample sheet. Data to be included in these summaries include:

Map Number: Refers to the map in the published plan where the priority site is located.
Each map should be numbered sequentially.

Site No.: Refers to the site number shown on the map. Number the sites in logical order
on the map, at least at first. However, the initial numbers are likely to change during
the process.

Site Name: The site name should be very descriptive and accurately represent its
location on the map and in the field.

Latitude/Longitude: These coordinates should be carefully measured from detailed
maps for the center point of the site.

Date Entered: The month/day/year that the sheet was initially completed.

Date Updated: The month/day/year that any information on the sheet was changed.

Local Expert/Land Manager Contact: List local experts so that you can contact them
during a spill for information on the resources that are actually present or to provide
more detail during planning. For example, the regional wildlife biologist would know if
the piping plovers have completed nesting and have dispersed, and thus no longer need
protection at that site. This is a good reason for including their specific expertise. The
listed experts should be the most knowledgeable local contact, someone who is very
familiar with the site and/or resource. Include the land manager contact to provide
access permission, directions, special restrictions due to current conditions, and resource
information.

Site Description: This section of the sheet includes identifying the physical settings at
the site, using whatever terminology is in use in the area. List the shoreline types present
using the ESI terminology if appropriate.




                                           69








                          SITE SUMMARY SHEET
MAP NO.___  SITE NO._____  NAME                       DATE ENTERED:____
LATITUDE:                 LONGITUDE:                  DATE UPDATED: ___
LAND MANAGER/CONTACT                            ExPERTISE         PHONE




SITE DESCRIPTION
PHYSICAL SETTINGS:
SHORELINE TYPES:

SENSITIVE RESOURCES TO BE PROTECTED





PROTECTION STRATEGIES


EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS:

STAGING AREAS:

ACCESS POINTS:

OTH ER:


RESPONSE LIMITATIONS
OPERATIONAL:


RESOURCE PROTECTION:









REVIEWED BY: FOSC _____SOSC _____FEDITRIBE                 OTHER ___



Figure 17. Site summary sheet to be completed for each protection priority site.


                                   70








Sensitive Resources to be Protected: List all of the specific sensitive resources at the site,
emphasizing the basis for sensitivity. Note any seasonal variations in presence or
sensitivity of the resources. Sample text would include "heron rookery, ï¿½ 100 nesting
pairs, May-September." The information should be correct, concise, and informative to
the resource manager who will be able to revise priorities quickly based on conditions
during a spill event, and to the responder who will know what is to be protected at the
site.


Protection Strategies: This section should include a clear description of the type of
protection to be used at the site, in preferred order of use if more than one strategy is
applicable. The description should include the intent (e.g., exclusion, diversion), method
(e.g., booming, underflow dams), location (e.g., ten feet inside the channel, at the north
end of the seawall), and any specific collection points.


Equipment Requirements: List the equipment needed to complete the protection
strategy, such as the type and feet of boom, and number of anchors, boats, bulldozers,
pipe, and pumps.


Staging Areas: List facilities or locations that can provide necessary services, such as
parking, work spaces, storage, security, power, and sanitation.


Access Points: For water-based response strategies, list the nearest boat ramp or hoist,
including details such as size and construction. For land-based response strategies,
provide directions to the shore from major roads. Be sure to identify locked gates and
private property; provide contact phone numbers.


Other: Examples of other information that can be provided are:


Response Limitations-Operational: Use the checklist in Figure 18 to generate site-
specific operational conditions that may affect the success of protection strategies. The
objective is to give the responder site-specific information to implement the protection
strategy effectively. It is important to identify the conditions under which the proposed
strategy will not work.


Response Limitations-Resources: Use the checklist in Figure 18 to generate site-specific
constraints on crews working at the site that will minimize disturbances to the site.


                                           7 1







Site Name                                         No. ___Date4



Water Conditions

   El Water current: <1 knot__ 1-2 knots ___2-3 knots ___>3 knots__

   El Flow direction:

   El Wave height: Average ___feet                   Storm ___feet

   El Tidal range:   Neap ___feet                    Spring ___feet

F]     Non-tidal water changes (describe):4

El     Water depths: Maximum ___feet  Minimum ___feet

El     Describe variations in water depth:I


Access4

El     Possible by: Vehicle ___Boat ___Foot ___Helo___

El     Land access restrictions:

El     Water access restrictions, at high tide:

El     At low tide:

   El Nearest staging area:

   El Nearest boat ramp:

   El Vessel traffic restrictions:


Other

El Describe: 


Figure I18. Operations limitations checklist.



                                 72








           Detaile Sketches  Fftiriy rtectcio Areas
    Produce detailed site sketches for all priority areas where you have developed and
    ground-truthed protection strategies. These sketches are usually plan-views drawn at a
    scale proportionate to the size and complexity of the site. Figure 19 is an example of a
    detailed site sketch. Note that the site sketch includes:


    *  Site name, number, and location (descriptive and map number);
    o   Date prepared;
    9  Tidal conditions during the site visit;
    o   North arrow;
    *  Scale bar;
    *  Legend for all symbols and abbreviations used on the sketch;
    0   Protection methods used;
    *  Access points;
    a Anchor points; and
    9  Collection areas (primary and alternative)


   You should also briefly describe or explain the protection strategies shown on the map.
   These detailed protection strategies should only be developed by a team of experienced
    response and resource personnel. All of the available information on currents, water
    levels, wave energy, and sediment transport patterns should be compiled and reviewed.
   A site visit is necessary to field-check access, locations for anchor points, current
   velocities, and other site-specific features that affect the design and logistical
*   requirements for site protection. It may be necessary to install permanent anchor points
   at some locations.

















                                              73





 INLET SKETCH MAP
                                      TI-JUA~~~~iq C-!5TMAMY   ~ ~ ~ ~ ~POTENTIAL PROTECTION
    Inle    t~aeItql-E'   CT~Ar.                                                                            STRATEGY (FLOOD TIDE)
                               Inlet~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~il ae thIE  OfOi

                               Rcorder($ )   M D   14 1  T 'M M                                                   0 - -~~~~~~~~~~~~o~ r   D e f l e c t i o n   B o o m
                                Date/Time  Q M U V -  I S 1 9 2 's  1 0 0 1 0                                     M   ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~O i l   O n   S h o r e l i n e
 TideStage L~I-008tt5j(42-2); PT. LOMQD                                           -L+Anco on
 Inlet Classification    B3gy3                                                                                          Hinge Line

 CHECKLIST                                                I   ,

   /North Arrow                                                           4
    Scale                        IIC 
   'High-Tide Line
   /Low-Tide line                                        1.
   2Substrate Type                                                                        i

 LEGEND                            4.

4--XXXXXXX--

 Recommended
 Oil-Catchment Area 




 Salt-Water Marsh                                                      -



 Fresh-Water Marsh                       I



High-Tide 
Overwash Zone



Last High-Tide
Swash line0                                                                                                                       S    30



Figure 19. Sample site sketch showing recommended protection strategy.







PLAN  VALIDATION

I. Match protection strategies with three OPA 90 scenarios most probable maximum most
   probable waost-case
Validation of the plan includes identifying equipment shortfalls and optimizing staging
areas according to the three scenarios outlined in OPA 90. The procedure is to run each
scenario, identify priority areas at risk within the specified time periods, then total up
equipment requirements.

2. Ran, train, exercise and reise
Conduct field exercises to test and refine the protection strategies, particularly where
site conditions are close to the operational limitations of the equipment. Field-test the
protection strategies as an integral component of the regular exercises and drills being
conducted in each area. Facilities, response contractors and co-ops, and others should
be encouraged to test the protection strategies in the plan during any field exercises
they conduct. Poorly designed or unfeasible protection strategies must be revised and
re-tested to verify their performance.


























                                           75








RECOMMENDED REFERENCES

       American Petroleum Institute. 1985. Oil Spill Cleanup: Options for Minimizing Adverse
       Ecological Impacts. API Publ. No. 4398. Washington, D.C. 110 pp.


       Code of Federal Regulations. 1992. Title 40, Part 300, National Oil and Hazardous
       Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. Washington, D.,C.: U.S. Government Printing
       Office.


       Exxon. 1990. Valdez Oil Spill Technology, 1989 Operations. Houston: Exxon Production
       Research Company.


       Exxon. 1992. Oil Spill Response Field Manual. Fourth Printing. Houston: Exxon Production
       Research Company. 193 pp.


       Oklahoma State University. 1993. Field Operations Guide. Report ICS-420-1. Stillwater,
       Oklahoma: Fire Protection Publications.


       Fingas, Mervin F., Wayne S. Duval, and Gail B. Stevenson. 1979. The Basics of Oil Spill
       Cleanup, with particular reference to Southern Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Environmental
       Emergency Branch, Environmental Protection Service, Environment Canada. 155 pp.


       IMO. 1988. Manual On Oil Pollution, Volumes 1-4. London: International Maritime
       Organization.


       International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Ltd. 1988. Response to Marine Oil
       Spills. New York: State Mutual Books. 125 pp.


       National Conventioneer. 1993 Oil Spill Conference and Instrumentation Equipment and
       Supplies Exposition. Pittsburgh: Publishers for Conventions, Inc.


       NOAA. 1992. Shoreline countermeasures manual template for temperate coastal
       environments. Seattle: Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division, National
       Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.





                                                 77








NOAA. 1993. Guidelines for developing digital environmental sensitivity atlases and
databases. Seattle: Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.


National Response Team. 1990. Oil Spill Contingency Planning, National Status. a Report
to the President Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.


Tramier, B. 1981. A field guide to coastal oil spill control and clean-up techniques. Report
No. 9/81. The Hague, The Netherlands: CONCAWE. 112 pp.


Texas A Et M University. OilSpill Control Course. Galveston: Occupational Environmental
Safety Training Division, Texas Engineering Extension Service.


Schu Ize, Robert and Harry L Hoffman, eds. 1993. World Catalog of Oil Spill Response
Products. Elkridge, Maryland: World Catalog. 592 pp.






























                                           78








INDEX                                                    steep banks 28, 59
                                                     barrier islands 56
                                                     barriers 1, 25, 30, 33, 34, 35, 41, 53, 54,
                                                     56,57,60,61,62
      A                                                 bubble barriers 31, 56
       access 35, 43, 46, 56, 58, 60, 72                 improvised barriers 30, 33, 56, 57,
           restrictions 34                               58, 59
       acute toxicity 11                             bathymetry 61
       "A" priority site 24, 67                      Baton Rouge 7
       Aerial observations 54                        bay 14, 57, 58
       aerial spraying 51                               large bay 55
       Air and water streams 31, 57                  beaches 15, 56
       air plume 52                                  bedrock 56
       Alaska 34                                     berms 54
       Alberta crude 12                              biological resources
       ALL STOP scenario 41                             crustaceans 16
       anadromous 17, 20                                dabbling ducks 22
       anchor booms 26                                  early life stages 17
       anchors 44, 72                                   endangered species 20, 53, 56
       API gravity 10                                   habitat sensitivity rankings 15
       Appendix V, Sensitive Areas 61                   habitats 15, 16
       Aquaculture 17                                   life history of the sensitive resources
       aquatic toxicity 51                              21
       Archaeological 43                                marine mammals, 16, 53
           artifacts 43                                  migratory waterfowl 20
           archaeological and cultural sites 18          natural resource restraints 44
           culturally important                          nesting 16, 21, 43, 53
           sites/reservations 17                            nesting/concentration areas 16
           fossils 43                                    nursery 16, 20
       Area                                             oil-sensitive species 15
           Committee 1, 2, 4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 19,         population concentration areas 16
           32, 41, 48, 61, 63, 67,                          presence/absence of sensitive
           Contingency Plan 1, 65                           animals 20
              plan validation 2, 62                     seabird nesting sites 54
              delineating sub-areas 14                  seaducks 22
       areas of high currents or wave                   shellfish 16, 24
       conditions 5                                     spawning 44, 52
       artifacts 43                                         spawning beaches 16
       average spill size 4                                 spawning streams 16
       Avgas 80/100 12                                  terrestrial mammals 16, 56
                                                         threatened or endangered lists 17
                                                     birds 16, 56
       B                                                 dabbling ducks 22
                                                         nesting 43, 53
       backwater lakes 58                                   nesting/concentration areas 16
       ballast 26                                       seabird nesting sites 56
       ballast tubes 28                                 seaducks 22
       banks                                         boats/vessels 72
          clay banks 56



                                                 79







   boat ramp or hoist 72
   draft constraints 5
   draft limitations 10                       canals 46
       deep-draft vessels 5, 37               cascade to collection points booms 45
   tugboats 52                                case histories 15
   vessel freight traffic 3                   centrifugal 48
   Vessel Operating Parameters and            changing wind direction 34
   Environmental Conditions 5                 channels 56, 62
   vessel response plans 4                        channel width 37
   vessel traffic 5, 31, 37, 43 chemical countermeasures 51
boom 1, 26, 32, 33, 35, 36, 39, 43, 46,               chemical dispersants 51
51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 72         chevron 46
   anchor boom 26, 40, 45, 54, 56, 59         circulation patterns 14
   anchors 44, 72                             clay banks 56
   boom size chart 28                         Coast Guard 4, 65
   cascade to collection points 45                Coast Guard Marine Pollution-
   chevron 45                                     Marine Safety Information System
   connector/anchoring points 28                  (MSIS) 4
   containment boom 44                            Commandant Notice 16471 1
   deflection boom 41, 45, 54, 56, 59             Philadelphia Captain of the Port 8
   exclusion booming 12, 45, 57, 58           Code of Federal Regulations
   fence boom 27                              29 CFR 1910.120 36
   fireboom 27                                33 CFR Part 1ï¿½155.1020 4
   floating booms 24                          33 CFR Part 154,1029 4
   harbor boom 28, 33                         collision 5
   inland boom 27, 28                         collisions 5
   intertidal boom 28                         combustion by-products 52
   longitudinal strength member 26            commercial losses 18
   sausage boom 29                            conditional methods 53
   shallow-water boom 39                      congested areas 5
   snare boom 29                              connector/anchoring points 26
   special-purpose booms 27                   contact toxicity 52
   straight deflection 48                     containment 10, 12, 25, 30, 56
   teardrop or donut 44                       containment boom 44
              ~~~~~~~~~coteainen boom 28
   Texas boom 28                              convergence zones 26, 54
   towed booms 26
                                              coral 52
bottom substrate 10                                coral reefs 16,60
bridges 3, 60                                  creeks 34
bubble barriers 31, 56                             creek mouths 30
bulky and heavy equipment 35                       intermittent creeks 59
bulldozers 72                                  crustaceans 16
Bunker C 11, 13                                culturally important sites/reservations
bunkering 10                                   17
   notifications 3                            currents 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 74
burning 52 (see also in-situ burning)              areas of high currents or wave
   combustion by-products 52                      conditions 5
burnout 36                                         current speed and direction 44
                                                  strong currents 30, 44, 51



                                         80








             ~~D                               ~~~~~~~EPA 4
ID
                                                EPA Emergency Response Center
 dabbling ducks 22                             Notification System 4
 dams 30, 34, 59                               ephemeral tidal inlet 30
     underflow and overflow 30                 equipment 1, 19, 33, 34, 37, 41, 48, 53,
 darkness 38, 51                               56, 58, 72
 databases 15                                      bulky and heavy equipment 35
 debris 35, 48, 49, 56, 58                         bulldozers 72
 decontamination 37                                equipment tending 36
 deep penetration 15                               equipment-staging areas 14
 deep water 34, 53, 57                         erosion 44
 deep-draft vessels 5, 37                      estuaries 56, 60
     draft constraints 5                        evaporation 10
     draft limitations 10                       exclusion 25, 46, 72
 deflection 25, 46                                 booming 12, 57, 58
 deflection boom 41, 45, 54, 56, 59,               zones 52
 delineating sub-areas 14                      explosion 10
 determining oil spill risk 3                      potential 32
 developing shoreline protection               exposed beaches 54
 strategies 25
 developing site-specific protection
 strategies 43                                 F
 diesel fuel 11, 29
     diesel-like products and light crude       fence boom 27
     oils 12                                    fetch 54, 56
 dilution 25                                   field exercises 77
 dispersants 51, 52, 54, 57                    field verification checklist 64
     dispersant effectiveness 11                film-forming agents 52
 disposal 38                                   fine-grained sediments 44
 diversion 72                                  fire boom 27
 docks 51                                      fish 16
 draft contraints 5, 10                        fish and wildlife resources 15, 16
                                                fish pens 60
                                                flash point 11
                                                floating booms 25
                                                floating oil 32, 48
 early life stages 17                          flood 56, 57, 62
 earthen barriers or berms 30                  flood-water levels 35
 ease of cleanup 15                            flotation 26
 embayments 60                                 flow gates 31, 34, 38, 56, 59
 emulsification 11, 25                         flow gates or locks 30
 endangered species 20, 53, 56                 fog 51
 entrainment 11,26, 27, 32, 45                 foraging/wintering areas 17
 entrances 57                                  freshwater marshes and swamps 58
     narrow entrances 46                        Fuel 38
 Environmental Impact Statements 18
 Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI)        G
 maps 15
 environmental toxicity 32                     gasoline 12, 32


                                           81








Geographical Response Plans 14                  intertidal boom 28
Georgia Bight 34                                intertidal communities 44
gravel 54, 59                                   intertidal resources 12
gravel beaches 15
Great Lakes 53, 54
groundings 5, 10
Gulf Coast 34
Gulf of Mexico 7                               jet fuels, 12


H                                            JK
habitat sensitivity rankings 15                 kelp beds 53
Habitats 15, 16                                 kerosene 12
harbor boom 27, 28                             kinematic viscosity 11
harbor entrances 5                              Kuwait 11
harbormasters 5
harbors 46, 51
haulout 16, 20, 54                           I
hazardous substances 2
Hazing 52                                       La Rosa crude 11
heavy                                           Lake Pontchartrain. 7
   heavy crude oils and residual               lakes 56
   products 13                                 landfills 38
   fuel oil 32                                 large bay 53
   Impact 39                                   leased/abundant beds 16
   oils 61                                    life history of the sensitive resources 21
herding agents 51                               lightering 10
high tides 35                                   locks 31, 38, 56
high-energy shoreline habitats 15               logistics 1
high-ri          sk areas 52 logistical constraints 32, 35,38
highly volatile oils 10                            access 35, 44, 46, 56, 58, 60, 73
highway oil transportation 3                           restrictions 35
historical spill pattern 3                         darkness 38, 51
human health 32                                    fuel 38
human-use resources 15, 17, 18, 60                 power 38,72
hurricanes 10                                      work spaces 72
                                               long-term cleanup 32
                                               longitudinal strength member 26
                                               low Impact 39
                                               low water/floods 10
ice 10, 35                                      low-viscosity oils 29
identifying potential spill sources 3           low-water periods 21
identifying sensitive resources 15              lube oil 12
improvised barriers 30
in-situ burning 11, 27, 54, 57
inhalation 10                                   M
inland boom 27, 28, 60
Intermittent creeks 59                          Management Areas 17


                                          82








mangrove                                       nautical charts, 61
    forest 22                                  navigation channels 37
    swamps 60                                  Navy facilities 3
manual                                         nearshore 56, 60
    deployment 34                                  bathymetry 34
    pick-up 25                                     zone 54
    recovery 48                                nesting 43, 53
map 66, 68, 70                                     nesting/concentration areas 16
mapping 1, 5, 21, 24, 61, 65, 67               netting 53, 54, 56, 57
marinas 46                                         systems 26
marine diesel, 12                              New England 34
marine mammals 16, 53                          no action 53, 54
marine sanctuaries 17                          no. 2 fuel oil 11, 12
marsh 61, 62                                   no. 6 fuel oil 13
matrix of protection methods                   NOAA charts 67
   versus operational limits 38               non-mechanical methods 51
   versus support equipment 41                North Slope crude 12
maximum most probable discharge 13             nursery 16, 20
mechanical protection 25
    protection methods 32
    protection plans 14
medium crude 32
medium oils and intermediate products          ocean 57
12                                            oil
migration routes 16                                API gravity 10
migratory waterfowl 20                             average spill size 4
minimizing human activity disturbance              emulsification 11, 25
43                                                 ntermediate fuel oils, 12
minimizing physical disturbances while            jet fuels 12
implementing protection strategies 43              kerosene 12
Mississippi River, 7                               maximum most probable discharge
moderate Impact 39                                 13
most probable discharge 13                         medium crude 34
mud 10, 56                                         medium oils and intermediate
                                                   products 12
                                                   most probable discharge 13
IN                                                 no. 2 fuel oil 11, 12
                                                   no 6 fuel oil 13
naphtha 12                                         North Slope crude 12
narrow                                             persistence 10, 13
    channels 5, 58                                 properties 10
    entrances 46                                   pour point 11
    structures 46                                      specific gravity 10
National Response Team 1                              viscosity 11, 48
Native lands 17                                       volatility 10
natural collection points 56                       risk characterization 3
natural removal processes 20                       South Louisiana crude 12
Natural Resource Constraints 43                    spot check recovery 11, 12, 13, 25,
natural resource restraints 44                     30, 46, 48, 57


                                          83








   stranded 10                                pour point 11
   tarballs 26, 48                            power 38, 72
   thick oil 54                               preparing work products for area plans
   thin slicks 54                             65
   total aromatic hydrocarbons 11             presence/absence of sensitive animals
   Venezuela crude 13                         20
   very heavy residual products 13            presentation of work products 65
   very light refined products 12, 32         prioritizing resources 15, 19
   West Texas crude 12                        protection
   worst-case discharge 4, 14                    short-term protection Strategies 32
   worst-case spill scenario 7                   steps for developing site-specific
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 1                       protection strategies 61
oil production wells 3                            protection methods for specific
oil properties important to risk                  physical settings 53
assessment and planning 10                    public swimming beach 53
oil recovery methods 48                       public use 24
oil-sensitive species 15                      pumping 11
oil spill risk characterization 3             pupping 17, 43, 53
On-Scene Spill Model (OSSM) 14
OPA 90 77
OPA 90 Spill Scenario Requirements 13         R
open exposed shorelines 54
open water 19, 20, 22, 33, 51,53, 56          rail transportation of oil 3
   boom 27, 29                                rainfall 35, 51
   recovery 25, 26                            ranking criteria 20
   skimming 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 61            "recommended" and "conditional"
operational limitations 40                    protection methods 24, 53, 62, 75
   operations limitations checklist 73        recovery equipment 10
overwintering 17                              recovery and storage capability 37
                                              recreation 17
                                              recycling 48
p                                             reduced visibility 10
                                              Regional Response Teams (RRT) 1
parking 72                                    reptiles/amphibians 17
permanent structures 52                       resource inventories 18
persistence 10, 13, 15                        resource management plans 18
Philadelphia Captain of the Port 8            resource managers 2, 19
physical and chemical properties 10           response community 62
phytoplankton 22                              response plans for marine
piers 51, 53                                  transportation-related facilities 1
pilots 5, 52                                  riprap 46
pipe 72                                       risk assessment database 4
pipelines 3                                   risk sub-areas 14
plan validation 77                            river banks 56
plants 17                                     river crossings 5
   seed beds 16, 24                           river currents 5
plunging water jets 31                        river-entrance bars 5
polymers 51                                   rivers 10, 31,34, 35, 56, 58
population concentration areas 16             rock 54


                                          84








rocky substrates 10                           ship containment 44
rookeries 16                                  ship operations 5
rough seas 33                                 shoaling 5
rough seas 36                                 shoreline
round-the-clock operations 38                     open-exposed shorelines 54
RRT consultation 51                               habitats 15
                                                  impacts 14
                                                  pre-treatment agents 52
IS                                                protection 2, 25
                                                  protection limitations 32
safety lapses 36                                  protection measures 1
safety risk 33                                    protection technology 25
safety training 36                                types 61
saltwater marsh creeks 57                         site-specific protection strategies 1,
San Joaquin Valley crude 13                       61
sand 10, 54, 56, 59                               Site-specific restrictions 43
    sand/mud flats 60                          short-term protection strategies 32
sandbags 55                                   site sketch 74, 75
sanitation 72                                 site summary sheet 70, 71
sausage boom 29                               sketches of priority sites 65
seabird nesting sites 54                      skimmers 11, 25, 26, 27, 35, 44, 48, 54
seaducks 22                                       skimmer selection 48, 49
seagrass beds 15                              skirt 26
seasonal considerations 10                    small streams 30
    ice 10, 35                                 smothering 52
   seasonal distribution 24                   snare boom 29
   seasonal influences on-site priority       soft-sediment sites 43
    20                                         solid barriers 25
   seasonal variations 72                     solidifiers 51
   winter storms 10                           solvents 12
seawalls 54                                   soot 52
security 72                                       sorbent 25, 29
sediment                                          sorbent or oleophilic skimmers 48
   sediment contamination 56                  sorbent boom 29, 58
   sediment transport 74                      sorbents 48
   suspended sediment loads 44                South Louisiana crude 11
seed beds 16, 24                              spawning 44
sensitive biological and human-use                spawning beaches 16
resources. 16                                     spawning streams 16
setting protection priorities 15              special-purpose booms 27
severity of impact 15                         specific gravity 10
shallow-water 34                              spill history 4, 5
   shallow-water areas 39                     spill-planning scenarios 14
   shallow-water boom 27, 28, 33, 39,         spills greater than 1,000 gallons 4
   62                                         spills greater than 500 gallons 9
shellfish 16, 24                              staging areas 14, 72
sheltered beach 30                            steps for developing site-specific
sheltered shorelines 56                       protection strategies 61
sheltered, interior marshes 20                storage 72








    storage and transfer facilities 4          topographic map 67
    storage capability 26                      total aromatic hydrocarbons  11
straight deflection 46                         towed booms 26
stranded 10                                    toxicity 10
stream 59                                          acute toxicity 11
    spawning streams 16                            aquatic toxicity 51
strong currents 32                                 contact toxicity 52
strong tidal currents 5                        trajectories 14
sub-areas. 63                                  trajectory 3
submerged                                      trampling 44
    aquatic vegetation 60                      transportation systems 3
    habitats 60                                trenches 30, 31, 34, 46, 54, 56, 57, 58,
subsistence 17                                 59, 60
substrate 13, 48, 56, 57, 58                   tugboats 52
    bedrock 56                                 turbulent mixing 56
    mud 10, 56                                 turtle nests 17, 54
subtidal habitats 15
    seagrass beds 22
suction 48                                     U
summary sheets 65
suspended sediment loads 44                    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3
swells 33                                      U.S. Department of Transportation 4
                                               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                               (EPA) 1
IT                                             U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute
                                               topographic maps 18
tarballs 26, 48                                U.S. Geological Survey topographic
teardrop or donut (boom) 44                    maps 67
terrestrial mammals 16, 56
Texas boom 28
thick oil 54                                   V
thin slicks 54
threatened or endangered lists 17              vegetated shoreline 60
tides                                          vegetated wetlands 15
   tidal changes 32                           vegetation 43, 44, 56
   tidal channels 57                          Venezuela crude, 13
   tidal current flow 46                      very heavy residual products 13
   tidal currents 34, 57, 46                  very light refined products 12, 32
   tidal flats 15, 59                         very shallow water 28, 32
   tidal fluctuations 34                      very strong currents 26
   tidal inlets 34, 58, 60                    vessels/boats
       ephemeral tidal inlet 30                   boat ramp or hoist 72
   tidal prism 58                                 draft constraints 5
   tidal range 61                                 draft limitations 10
   tidal scale boom 28                                deep-draft vessels 5, 37
   tidal stages 34                                tugboats 52
   tide gates 53                                  vessel freight traffic 3
   tide pool fauna 44                             vessel operating parameters and
   tides 5                                        environmental conditions 5



                                         86








    vessel response plans 4
    vessel traffic 5, 31, 37, 43
viable methods 53
viscosity 11, 48
volatility 10


W

water
    column 61
    conditions 10
    depth 34, 37, 48
    intakes 17, 60
    velocities 61
    volume 34
    Water-associated sites 17
    water-column organisms 11
    water-in-oil emulsions (mousse) 11
    water-quality monitoring 61
    water-soluble fraction 11
waterfowl 53
waterfront rail yards 3
wave 60, 74
waves 5, 33, 51, 53, 54, 56
    areas of high currents or wave
    conditions 5
weather 10
    changing wind direction 34
    hurricanes 10
    ice 10, 35
    winter storms 10
weir 48
West Coast 34
West Texas crude 12
wetlands 15, 58
wetting agents 52
wind 34, 51, 54, 56
winter storms 10
wintering/migration areas 16
work spaces 72
worst-case
   discharge 4, 14
   spill scenario 7







                                          87