[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
PHASE 2 REPORT E HE COASTAL WETLANDS MAPPING T PROGRAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE Prepared for The New Hampshire Coastal Program Office of State Planning, NH QH 104.5 N58 na C63 1986 NORMANDEAU ASSOCIA-tE5,, INC. phase 2 rept. V. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS ENGINEERS &PLANNERS PHASE 2 REPORT ETHE COASTAL WETLANDS MAPPING PROGRAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE Prepared for The New Hampshire Coastal Program Office of State Planning, NH Prepared by Martin C. Michener Gretchen Stevens Michael H. Simpson Normandeau Associates, Inc. 25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03102 The New Hampshire Coastal Program provided a grant for the preparation of this report which was funded in part by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, NOAA. June 30,. 1986 P-roPerty Of CSC Libreary U - S - DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CENTER 2234 SOUTH HObOON AVENUE CHARLESTON , SC 29405-2413 SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 GOALS OF THE STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 REPORT OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 GUIDE TO USING WETLANDS MAPS AND EVALUATIONS . . . . 4 2.1 WHAT ARE WETLANDS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 WHAT ARE DUNES AND SALT MARSHES? . . . . . . . 5 2.3 WHAT ARE WETLANDS BENEFITS? . . . . . . . . . 6 2.4 PLANNING WITH A WETLANDS MAP 7 2.5 RESULTS OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS EVALUATION 11 2.6 REVIEWING A PROPOSED PROJECT; AN EXAMPLE . . . 27 3.0 MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON COASTAL WETLANDS . . . 31 3.1 FRESHWATER WETLANDS . . . . . * . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.1 Wetland boundary 4efinitions . . . . . . . 31 3.1.2 Wetland ecology and hydrology . . . . . . 32 3.1.3 Fresh water wetlands results & impacts . . 35 3.1.4 Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.2 SALT MARSHES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2.1 Salt marsh development and ecology . . . . 38 3.2.2 Salt marsh hydrology and degradation . . . 45 3.2.3 Salt marsh soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.2.4 Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3 SAND DUNE COMMUNITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.3.1 Dune ecology and development . . . . . . . 54 3.3.2 Dune uses and degradation . . . . . . . . 56 3.3.3 Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.0 APPENDIX: FRESHWATER WETLANDS, DETAILED RESULTS 4.1 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS 4.2 RESULTS TABLES BY TOWN 4.3 WETLANDS MODELS 5.0 APPENDIX: SALT MARSHES, DETAILED RESULTS 5.1 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS 5.2 RESULTS TABLES FOR STUDY AREA 5.3 IMPACT ANALYSIS OF SELECTED SALT MARSHES 6.0 APPENDIX: SAND DUNES, DETAILED RESULTS 6.1 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS 6.2 RESULTS TABLES FOR STUDY AREA LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE Table 1 List of wetland letter codes . . . . . . . . . . . . 8@ Table 2 List of benefits from freshwater wetlands . . . . . 11 Table 3 Model scores for all freshwater wetlands . . . . . . 15 Table 4 Wetland model ranking by thirds . . . . . . . . . . 21 Table 5 Sample hypothetical ecological summary . . . . . . . 29 Table 6 Indicator plant species for bogs . . . . . . . . . . 34 Table 7 Indicator plant species for salt marshes . . . . . . 42 Table 8 Indicator plant species for sand dunes . . . . . . . 55 Table 9 Summary of impacts at Parson's Creek Marsh (Section 5.3) 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GOALS OF THE STUDY Normandeau Associates, Inc. (NAI) has completed the inventory and mapping of wetlands and sand dunes in the six coastal New Hampshire towns of New Castle, Rye, North Hampton, Hampton, Hampton Falls, and Seabrook (Figure 1). Copies of the maps have been provided along with this report to the Office of State Planning and to each town. This report is primarily intended to provide users of these maps in each town with a tool for medium intensity planning. The tool immediately provides: 1. Mapping of approximate boundaries of dunes and wetlands on aerial photographs taken during March, 1986, at a scale of 1" = 200 ft. Specific dunes and larger wetlands are identified by unique five-letter codes. 2. Mapping of approximate boundaries of poorly-drained soils where they extend beyond wetland boundaries (as hatched areas enclosed by dashed lines) superimposed on the same aerial photos. 3. A means of evaluating wetlands and dunes in each town; a list of observations for salt marshes & larger wetlands; and a table of model results by which to gauge the values of the larger and many of the smaller mapped freshwater wetlands; these include: a. a brief list of the representative plants in each wetland and summary of the overall ecological community structure (trees, shrubs, etc.) b. the value to wildlife and downstream aquatic life c. value for groundwater recharge, d. value for flood water retention, e. value for shoreline protection from erosion, f. value for the maintenance of surface water quality, L E /R E N R T H 0 A P 7 N H-A F A L L LINE 7 A 5 LINE 6 LINE 4 LINE 1 LINE 5 LI 3 LINE 2 Figure 1. Study Area for coastal mapping Project. 3 g. value for economic, recreational, aesthetic and educational potential. This report secondarily provides data and guidelines to each town for continuing the planning process in greater detail: 4. Establishing a scientific basis for reviewing projects, to present evidence to aid the NH State Wetlands Board (NHSWB) and the US Corps of Engineers (COE) in permit review, so the towns will have a more important role in development decisions and the resulting impacts to each community. 5. Mapping the prime wetlands in the town. 1.2 REPORT OVERVIEW This report is organized to accommodate a range of users from layman to planner; it progresses from a "how-to" beginning to a detailed account of the concepts, methods and results in the appendices: 2.0 This section explains how to approach wetlands location and evaluation and gives the model results. It also describes what these maps and data do not do. 3.0 This section explains in more detail the definition of wetlands and dunes, and how the maps and model results can provide additional information important in minimizing impacts from projects. 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 These three appendices contain detailed evaluation results for freshwater wetlands, salt marshes, and dunes. These include descriptions of the areas and results of the study. 4 2.0 GUIDE TO USING WETLANDS MAPS AND EVALUATIONS 2.1 WHAT ARE WETLANDS? Wetlands are neither open water nor well drained dry land; they are intermediate areas subject to high water during some of each year's growing season. They are shown on the project maps by solid lines; the more significant wetlands along with some smaller wetlands are identified by unique codes. Within these areas, high water causes a saturated condition in the upper 24 inches of soil 'producing a community of plants adapted to wetness. In a complex and interactive process, soils saturated with water above 5 degrees C (41 degrees F) become rapidly depleted of oxygen, killing the root systems of most plants. Wetland plants have adaptations allowing them to survive this lack of oxygen. Saturation also leads to chemical conditions in which the soil turns shades of grey or black, replacing the normal yellow or red colors (chroma) or causing visible mottling to appear among the lumps of soil. These features place the soil in either the "Very Poorly Drained" or the "Poorly Drained" category. Note that, in this usage, the word "drained" has a special meaning denoting height of the yearly water table. Some sandy permeable soils are "Very Poorly Drained" due to their low location relative to the nearest stream or river. "Permeable" denotes ease of water movement through-the soil; "drained" denotes how close to the soil surface the water table lies. Most people are aware that septic system leachfields function poorly in saturated soils, causing groundwater pollution. Wetlands were first legally defined as areas unsuited to septic systems and many people still think of them in this very limited sense. High intensity soils mapping is essential to define the proper placement of leach- fields. 5 2.2 WHAT ARE DUNES AND SALT MARSHES? Dunes, rare in New Hampshire, are ridges or mounds of loose sea sand, formed by waves and wind, trapped by plants specially adapted to the sandy conditions. Wind-born sand moves during dry, windy weather in dune areas, filling in calm areas and eroding peaks exposed to the force of the wind. Dunes are fragile ecosystems because they depend on plants for stability and these plants are easily impacted by man's activiti&s. Typical dune plants in New Hampshire include dune grass (Aminophila breviligulata), beach pea (Lathyrus japonicus), beach plum (Prunus maritima), and seaside goldenrod (Solidago sexper- vire ns). Dunes are protected by NH state law from development. They are delineated on project maps by solid lines and identifying codes which start with "DU". Detailed results are presented for 12 dunes with identifying numbers in Appendix Section 6.0. Salt marshes are level areas regularly inundated by the salt tides. In New Hampshire, tidal wetlands are protected up to 3J feet above local mean high tide. They are shown on project maps by solid lines and identifying codes starting with "SM". Woody plants cannot survive in salty soils, which are usually dominated by salt marsh grass (Spartina spp. ). The combination of salt and peat preserves the layers of organic muck as long as the peat is a part of an intact tidal system. Road culverts and banks may restrict the normal tidal flushing, allowing the salt to be slowly washed out of the marsh peat. In many areas of NH, this process has already degraded many salt marshes by a sequence of events: fresh rain water replaces the salty water, flushing out the salt. Lacking the salt preservative, the peat oxidizes, becomes acid, rots and slumps, producing offensive odors. Pools form in depressions in the rotting soil, on which little vegetation will gr ow. Evaporation during dry weather concentrates any salt in these shallow pools, so they become too salty for fauna to survive. This means they make poor feeding places for birds, and lack the fish which normally control mosquitoes. Inundation by the highest tides (spring tides) allows the brief breeding of the salt marsh mosquito, and these impacted marshes 6 become a major nuisance. More detailed accounts of these developmental processes, along with evaluations of the existing impacts to NH salt marshes, are presented for 51 numbered salt marshes in Appendix Section 5.0. 2.3 WHAT ARE WETLAND BENEFITS? The study of wetlands has shown that they provide benefits to the public well beyond any negative effects associated with mosquito production or failing septic systems. Wetlands provide necessary habitat to many birds and wildlife not associated with upland or open water areas. Freshwater wetlands located along a stream or river help downstream abuttors by controlling flood crests, providing water quality purification, and maintaining water purity and flow during dry periods (important to protect downstream fresh and saltwater fisheries resour- ces). These and other public benefits are lost when wetlands are drained or filled. These benefits require legal protection, just as public wildlife resources require state game laws to prevent improper exploitation of deer, fish, ducks or grouse. Freshwater wetland benefits can be measured by experienced wetland scientists using observable parameters. For 238 numbered freshwater wetlands, NAI has recorded field observations on standardized data sheets and computed scores for ten beneficial functions. These computation methods are called models. To put the models in historical perspective, they were developed in 1981 jointly by IEP and NAI to meet the requirements of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in reviewing and ranking over 100 small wetlands. For the New Hampshire study, the models use the same parameters as the original Wisconsin models, but computations have been modified somewhat to increase precision and to reflect the applicable wetland laws. The results of the model computations can be found in Tables 3 and 4 (Section 2.5). More detailed results, data sheets, and plant lists for each wetland are given in Section 4.0. 7 2.4 PLANNING WITH A WETLANDS MAP Federal and state laws define the boundaries of wetland areas (for detailed definitions, see Section 3.1.1). NAI has provided each town with sepia maps, indicating and numbering wetland areas delineated not just by soil drainage class, but by four parameters observed in the field: plant community, soil characteristics, topographic features and hydrologic clues. These parameters are necessary to match the defi- nition of freshwater wetlands found in NH CAR Chapter Wt 100, Part Wt 101.01, and defined by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Areas found to fit these definitions are delineated by solid lines. Brooks with narrow linear wetlands borders were not delineated. All significant wetlands, and as many lesser wetlands as field time allowed, are labeled with codes of five characters: two letters and three digits. These have been evaluated in the field for the ten benefits. Dune areas are all assigned the letters "DU" and salt marshes are assigned "SM" for all six towns. All other letter combinations denote major watersheds in which the freshwater wetlands occur (Table 1). Smaller wetlands are also delineated by solid lines, but the five-character labels are replaced by swamp symbols. The maps also show areas mapped by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) as poorly drained soils, but not found to be wetlands. These are shown as cross-hatched areas, surrounded by dashed (not solid) lines. These areas do not share the list of public benefits known to derive from wetlands. However, if septic leachfields are to be sited, these areas should be carefully investigated with test pits and hand augering. In summary, solid delineations show wetlands with potential benefits to offsite abuttors which may require protection from project- related impacts; these areas are also unsuited to siting septic system leachfields. Dashed areas are unsuited to septic system leachfields, but in areas where water and sewering are available, loss to project construction probably does not present a threat to public welfare. 8 Table 1. List of wetland letter codes LETTER WATERSHED, RIVER CODE OR OTHER LABEL AW Awcomin Swamp BA Bailey Brook BE Berry's Brook BR Brown's River BW Blackwater River CA Cain's Brook DR Drake's River *DU DUNE, not a watershed HA Hampton Falls River HU Hunt's Island Creek LI Little River LU Lucy Brook ME Meadow Pond NC New Castle PB Philbrick Brook PH Philbrick Pond *SM SALTMARSH, not a watershed TA Taylor River WA Wallis sands creeks WN Winnicut River WT Witch Creek not a freshwater wetland When development is proposed, project review should begin with the use of these maps and data, followed by a high-intensity study to define the limits of jurisdiction and impact. The extrapolation of measurements from aerial photos introduces distortions which are inherent in the process. Tax maps are also drawen from aerial photo projections, and each produces distortions due to variations in the angle of view (Figure 2). If every landscape were flat and every photo taken by a level airplane no problems would arise. However, a straight map line passing over a hill will appear straight only from directly overhead (Figure 2, "B"). From one side it appears to curve one way, from the other it curves the other way. The distortion increases with the distance from the photo's center and with the height of the hill. This affects the scale of the photo reproductions and tax maps as well. VIEW FROM POINT A VIEW FROM POINT B VIEW FROH POINT C Figure 2. Illustration of distortion inherent in aerial photographs of uneven terrain. 10 To correctly locate property lines on th e wetland maps, some estimate of accuracy should be made in each case, based on the flatness of the terrain and the nearness of the property to the map's center. The most accurate method is to identify the property bounds or location of proposed work relative to real objects visible on the wetland aerial photos, such as field edges, water courses, or stone walls. The wetlands are, of course, accurately delineated with resepect to visible objects, so this procedure will eliminate the effects of distortion. In reviewing projects where dredge or fill of more than 10,000 square feet (sf) of wetland is proposed, towns should require applicants to independently verify wetland boundaries. The project site should be flagged by a wetland scientist then surveyed onto the project topo- graphic map by licensed surveyors. This is necessary to accurately determine the project boundaries with respect to each wetland boundary. Many New Hampshire towns now require developers of subdivisions and other major projects to present engineering surveys on recent topo- graphic maps. For hilly terrains, 5 or 10 foot contour intervals may be sufficient, but for most of the towns on the New Hmpshire seacoast, relief is very low and 212 foot intervals are more appropriate for locating wetland edges, slopes and buffer zones. 2.5 RESULTS OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS EVALUATION NAI has completed evaluations and ranked 238 wetlands in this study to provide each town with ranking estimates of the public values specifically cited by state and federal laws (Table 2). These benefits are listed below in the order they are most commonly used, along with the abbreviation used throughout this report for each: Table 2. List of benefits from freshwater wetlands Model Abbreviation and Beneficial function 1. Biol Biological function, includes biological productivity and wildlife habitat (eg. duck breeding, muskrat, amphibian breeding, aquatic life support for fish, etc.). 2. Hydro Hydrological Support, ability to maintain good quality downstream flow during dry periods of weather and consequently support downstream aquatic life. 3. GrWat Ground Water, ability to protect ground water recharge (a value also attributable to permeable uplands). 4. Flood Flood & Storm water storage, ability to store runoff and reduce or delay flood crests, preventing downstream damage. 5. ShLi Shoreline protection from erosion by waves or runoff. 6. WQual Water Quality maintenance, ability to renovate water quality by filtering, absorbing, or breaking down pollutants. 7. Econ Economic values, primarily noting timber value 8. Recr Recreational values, provide public with fish & game or passive rec reation opportunities 9. Aest Aesthetic values, degree of visual scenic appeal based on an assessment of both water and plant features. 10. Educ Educational value, capacity to provide public with access- ible wetland ecology, rare plants, or animals. 12 The scores from the models range from zero to 100, and are listed by model and wetland code (Table 3). Unfortunately, these scores do not provide an ideal means of understanding wetland values, because res ults from different models are grouped in different ways. For example, the results of the biological model (#l) range from 14to 87, with an average of about 47, or about what one might expect. The shoreline protection model (#5) ranges from 0 (84 occurrences) to 66, with an average of about 14; not what one would expect. Some model results are grouped around one value due to regional similarities in wetland parameters; many wetlands score the same due to similar soils, slopes and hydrology. In the economic model (#7), 40% of the wetlands (94 occurrences) have a score of exactly 73.9. The point is that one would have to be extremely familiar with each model to understand the raw" scores in Table 3. One further.level of analysis was therefore performed. For each model, the 238 wetlands were sorted by score from lowest to highest. The range was then broken into thirds. Each wetland in the lowest third was given an L for lowest; each wetland in the middle was assigned an M for medium; each in the highest third was assigned an H for high (Table 4). This ranks the wetlands in the study area against one another, instead of assigning them on an arbitrary scale, just as scholastic tests provide results in percentile, ranking students against one another. The ranking was performed separately on all ten sets of model scores. The results of this ranking are easier to interpret: of the wetlands studied, those scoring H in some benefit are of outstanding public value. Those with M are quite valuable. Those with L may be locally important, but are probably on a par with those numerous wetlands in the study area which were mapped but not numbered or evaluated. Wetlands should not be given a single rating, lumping different wetland benefits. This would compromise the process of planning projects to avoid specific impacts. No two benefits are of exactly comparable local importance. To.illustrate the role of local 13 importance, contrast the values of a ten acre forested wetland to two communities: one with many low-lying, similar wetlands; the second, with many dense urban areas, more vertical relief, well confined streams with no flooding problems, and very little wild open space. In the first location, the wildlife habitat value (1 Biol) would be of lower importance than the value for flood control (4 Flood). In the second, forested wetlands would be more valuable to the public for their wildlife habitat than for flood control. The models do not take into account the setting, and to average the two model results as if they mattered equally would be unsound planning. New Hampshire law (NH CAR Chapter Wt 700) requires each town to map and list wetlands of unusual value. These wetlands are to be evaluated and a selection submitted for overall town approval to be designated as "Prime Wetlands". The state guidelines only require that wetlands must have "Very Poorly Drained" (VPD) soil and be of some high value. NAI has incorporated these guidelines into the model compu- tations. Wetlands are given a "P" in Table 3 to indicate candidacy for prime status which meet two criteria: 1. SOILS: a wetland must either include an SCS mapping unit with overall VPD class, or have shown sufficient standing water, swamp or muck deposits on a site visit to fit the VPD class, with summertime water tables at or above the soil surface. 2. BENEFITS: a wetland must rank in the upper third of those sampled in at least one of the ten model scores (see Table 4, 11 H11). With these model results each town should establish a review procedure which follows the state guidelines. The following is a suggested checklist to act as a starting point: 14 1. Review the list and maps provided in this report for boundary and data sheet accuracy. All "SM" and "DU" areas are automatically candidates for prime protection. (There are 10 freshwater wetlands in the study area determined to have VPD soils which were not evaluated during this study. These are marked on the wetland maps with wetland codes preceeded by an asterisk (*). They do not appear among the data sheets but should be investigated further for prime candidacy.) 2. For each wetland, add known cultural, historic and archaeological values not included in the NAI survey procedure. Reassess the prime candidacy. 3. Make copies from the sepia maps containing all candidates for prime status and highlight these wetlands and dune areas. 4. Present this combined mapping for public review and incorporate into a warrant for town meeting. 5. After approval, submit the requisite copies to the NHSWB and the coastal program as prime wetlands maps. 6. For review of projects, the town is required to notify the state of all proposed action in prime wetlands. Table 3. Model scores for all freshwater wetlands These wetland functional models were developed jointly by NAI and IEP in 1981 to meet the requirements of the state of Wisconsin in protecting ten benefits which accrue to the public from wetlands. They were pub- lished in 1981 as part of a site review for Exxon Minerals Co., Rhine- lander, WI, and later by G. Hollands and D. Magee in a presentation to the Association of State Wetland Managers in 1985. The models are run here in modified form; they include the parameters originally specified by the Wisconsin models, but have been altered to fulfill the requirements of wetlands laws in north central New England. Each model ranges from 0 to 100. It is important to understand that a result of zero does not indicate zero importance; only that the wetland is at the low end as compared to others in the region. Model values do not represent the actual value of a wetland in performing each function; they represent a numerical figure suitable for ranking wetlands one against another. A 'P' in the PRIME column indicates the wetland ful- fills the New Hampshire definition of prime wetlands: Very Poorly Drain- ed soil and a high (upper one third) ranking in the value of at least one benefit (see Table 4, 'H' for high). WETLAND Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ*PRIME AW002 51.9 56.5 41.5 62.7 0.0 50.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 AW003 65.1 68.4 66.0 73.5 14.4 55.8 91.3 54.7 47.8 71.4 AW004 48.8 67.1 41.5 62.7 31.0 50.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 BA001 72.0 75.0 39.6 53.9 20.6 62.7 '65.2 54.7 82.6 76.1 P BA002 51.1 63.1 43.3 61.7 17.5 58.8 73.9 50.6 39.1 53.9 BA003 68.2 75.0 45.2 56.8 51.7 56.8 73.9 45.2 59.4 63.4 P BA004 47.2 61.8 58.4 72.5 16.5 52.9 73.9 36.9 43.4 50.7 P BA005 72.8 82.8 81.1 66.6 48.2 64.7 91.3 52.0 52.1 76.1 P BA006 45.7 64.4 62.2 67.6 14.4 55.8 73.9 36.9 34.7 46.0 P BA007 34.8 52.6 49.0 72.5 0.0 50.9 56.5 21.9 34.7 41.2 BA008 54.2 65.7 64.1 68.6 14.4 57.8 73.9 41.0 47.8 63.4 BA010 66.6 68.4 75.4 70.5 16.5 59.8 91.3 52.0 52.1 76.1 P BE004 47.2 51.3 37.7 64.7 19.6 54.9 39.1 21.9 36.2 46.0 P BE005 36.4 9.2 50.9 65.6 0.0 57.8 65.2 35.6 55.0 42.8 P BE007 27.9 55.2 24.5 44.1 2.0 29.4 13.0 43.8 69.5 33.3 P BE008 39.5 55.2 33.9 64.7 0.0 48.0 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 BE012 71.3 72.3 49.0 69.6 17.5 77.4 73.9 45.2 49.2 76.1 P BE013 26.3 47.3 33.9 60.7 0.0 45.0 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 BE014 32.5 63.1 54.7 72.5 16.5 55.8 73.9 32.8 30.4 28.5 P BE015 54.2 68.4 60.3 61.7 17.5 54.9 91.3 52.0 52.1 76.1 P BE016 56.5 68.4 67.9 68.6 0.0 64.7 91.3 52.0 52.1 76.1 P BE017 43.4 63.1 35.8 64.7 19.6 55.8 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 P BE018 45.7 53.9 37.7 58.8 17.5 55.8 73.9 36.9 43.4 50.7 P BRO02 27.9 51.3 69.8 63.7 0.0 47.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 BWO01 40.3 57.8 60.3 63.7 0.0 55.8 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 BWO02 44.9 44.7 54.7 55.8 14.4 40.1 56.5 26.0 39.1 46.0 P BWO03 33.3 51.3 69.8 67.6 0.0 50.0 73.9 32.8 30.4 28.5 BWO04 44.9 71.0 77.3 65.6 16.5 65.6 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 BWO05 29.4 51.3 54.7 73.5 0.0 50.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 BWO06 27.9 51.3 54.7 69.6 0.0 47.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 Model modified from Wisconsin original 16 (Table 3. Model scores for all freshwater wetlands, cont'd) WETLAND Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ*PRIME CA003 42.6 65.7 39.6 56.8 17.5 56.8 73.9 36.9 34.7 49.2 P CA004 55.0 64.4 62.2 65.6 14.4 55.8 73.9 41.0 47.8 58.7 P CA005 65.1 64.4 75.4 49.0 17.2 56.8 65.2 54.7 65.2 66.6 P CA015 28.6 51.3 69.8 63.7 0.0 47.0 73.9 35.6 30.4 36.5 CA016 24.0 51.3 18.8 61.7 0.0 46.0 73.9 35.6 30.4 36.5 CA020 24.0 51.3 67.9 58.8 0.0 46.0 56.5 21.9 30.4 28.5 CA021 44.1 61.8 58.4 72.5 16.5 52.9 60.8 31.5 26.0 28.5 CA024 53.4 68.4 75.4 63.7 28.9 51.9 73.9 41.0 47.8 63.4 CA025 30.2 52.6 56.6 70.5 0.0 48.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 P DR001 57.3 68.4 33.9 61.7 19.6 60.7 73.9 49.3 39.1 61.9 DR002 25.5 7.8 54.7 57.8 0.0 44.1 30.4 12.3 42.0 22,.2 P DR003 44.9 61.8 58.4 68.6 14.4 50.0 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 DR004 39.5 59.2 62.2 64.7 0.0 57.8 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 DR005 43.4 56.5 52.8 69.6 0.0 50.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 DR006 49.6 51.3 54.7 71.5 0.0 50.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 P DR007 34.8 50.0 67.9 62.7 0.0 45.0 73.9 32.8 30.4 25.3 P DR010 58.9 53.9 52.8 65.6 8.2 54.9 47.8 32.8 55.0 69.8 P DR011 20.9 47.3 66.0 64.7 0.0 48.0 56.5 24.6 30.4 28.5 P DR012 53.4 59.2 58.4 75.4 16.5 53.9 73.9 43.8 43.4 58.7 P DR013 42.6 56.5 69.8 63.7 14.4 47.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 DR014 14.7 0.0 30.1 50.0 0.0 39.2 56.5 19.1 34.7 25.3 DR015 20.1 52.6 26.4 64.7 19.6 47.0 56.5 21.9 30.4 20.6 DR016 33.3 51.3 30.1 57.8 0.0 46.0 73.9 32.8 39.1 38.0 DR018 56.5 65.7 41.5 52.9 31.0 51.9 73.9 41.0 47.8 71.4 P DR019 52.7 60.5 45.2 62.7 13.4 71.5 65.2 39.7 63.7 63.4 P DR022 27.1 57.8 32.0 54.9 13.4 46.0 43.4 16.4 26.0 12.6 DR023 30.2 7.8 32.0 58.8 15.5 44.1 43.4 13.6 26.0 12.6 DR026 27.1 44.7 54.7 48.0 0.0 47.0 73.9 32.8 30.4 28.5 P DR027 48.8 56.5 56.6 41.1 35.1 48.0 73.9 41.0 50.7 46.0 P HAO02 31.7 50.0 47.1 58.8 12.4 38.2 56.5 30.1 34.7 25.3 HAO03 32.5 51.3 30.1 61.7 0.0 46.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 HAO04 56.5 75.0 37.7 60.7 65.5 54-.9 73.9 45.2 59.4 71.4 P HAO05 37.9 47.3 43.3 24.5 10.3 25.4 13.0 52.0 69.5 30.1 P HAO06 45.7 22.3 39.6 59.8 9.3 53.9 47.8 28.7 50.7 46.0 P HAO07 51.9 59.2 49.0 34.3 10.3 31.3 30.4 67.1 69.5 41.2 P HAO08 31.0 55.2 39.6 61.7 0.0 48.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 HAO09 53.4 7.8 64.1 60.7 14.4 51.9 39.1 20.5 36.2 53.9 P HAO10 31.0 5.2 54.7 66.6 0.0 46.0 60.8 24.6 26.0 20.6 HAO11 63.5 76.3 66.0 69.6 17.5 70.5 91.3 60.2 39.1 61.9 P HAO15 37.9 42.1 47.1 49.0 0.0 38.2 30.4 15.0 37.6 26.9 HAO17 46.5 59.2 50.9 59.8 19.6 53.9 56.5 26.0 39.1 53.9 P HAO18 60.4 80.2 66.0 77.4 16.5 66.6 91.3 52.0 43.4 58.7 P HA021 34.1 56.5 30.1 57.8 17.5 46.0 73.9 32.8 39.1 33.3 HA024 52.7 57.8 54.7 64.7 0.0 63.7 56.5 30.1 40.5 50.7 P HA025 45.7 51.3 30.1 67.6 0.0 56.8 56.5 30.1 40.5 46.0 P HA028 59.6 71.0 64.1 64.7 17.5 60.7 91.3 52.0 43.4 66.6 P HAO,30 30.2 56.5 33.9 62.7 0.0 49.0 73.9 32.8 30.4 33.3 HA032 65.1 68.4 37.7 62.7 31.0 52.9 73.9 41.0 43.4 63.4 p HA034 47.2 61.8 41.5 63.7 0.0 58.8 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 HU003 38.7 52.6 58.4' 50.0 28.9 48.0 43.4 16.4 30.4 20.6 P Model modified from Wisconsin original 17 (Table 3. Model scores for all freshwater wetlands, cont'd) WETLAND Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ*PRIME HU004 31 7 59.2 32.0 51.9 17.5 50.9 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 HU005 27'9 51.3 69.8 63.7 0.0 47.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 p HU006 37.2 57.8 75.4 57.8 0.0 55.8. 73.9 32.8 39.1 38.0 LI003 44.9 57.8 43.3 67.6 0.0 54.9 73.9 39.7 39.1 46.0 LI004 43.4' 46.0 49.0 71.5 0.0 53.9 39.1 19.1 31.8 41.2 P LI005 55.8 68.4 43.3 63.7 35.1 66.6 56.5 34.2 36.2 49.2 P LI006 68.2 63.1 52.8 43.1 17.2 49.0 30.4 52.0 53.6 79.3 P LI007 41.8 67.1 47.1 64.7 0.0 64.7 91.3 47.9 39.1 46.0 LI008 41.0 63.1 54.7 68.6 14.4 52.9 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 P LI009 32.5 52.6 56.6 70.5 0.0 49.0 73.9 32.8 30.4 28.5 P LI010 24.8 46.0 32.0 63.7 0.0 46.0 56.5 21.9 30.4 28.5 LI011 66.6 69.7 73.5 53.9 27.5 64.7 65.2 52.0 63.7 71.4 P LI012 50.3 59.2 50.9 59.8 17.5 51.9 56.5 26.0 39.1 46.0 LI013 48.0 82.8 45.2 68.6 17.5 68.6 91.3 47.9 43.4 50.7 P LI014 34.8 52.6 62.2 59.8 0.0 53.9 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 P LI015 43.4 72.3 41.5 67.6 39.3 61.7 73.9 36.9 30.4 41.2 P LI016 44.1 65.7 52.8 63.7 17.5 58.8 60.8 31.5 26.0 28.5 P LI017 53.4 63.1 54.7 69.6 19.6 61.7 56.5 34.2 36.2 53.9 P LI018 65.1 69.7 32.0 63.7 65.5 61.7 39.1 23.2 44.9 63.4 LI019 73.6 86.8 52.8 70.5 58.6 68.6 78.2 54.7 39.1 58.7 P LI020 41.0 57.8 49.0 58.8 0.0 52.9 73.9 36.9 34.7 46.0 P LI021 55.8 64.4 45.2 60.7 15.5 65.6 56.5 34.2 31.8 46.0 LI022 39.5 9.2 32.0 52.9 11.3 50.9 47.8 30.1 57.9 41.2 P LI023 41.0 51.3 24.5 51.9 11.3 49.0 47.8 32.8 53.6 41.2 P LI024 59.6 69.7 37.7 59.8 39.3 57.8 73.9 41.0 43.4 66.6 P LI025 20.9 44.7 22.6 58.8 0.0 47.0 17.3 9.5 20.2 4.7 LI026 52*7 61,8 33*9 64,7 7,2 55,8 47,8 30*1 46*3 60*3 LI027 35.6 10.5 39.6 59.8 0.0 50.0 73.9 30.1 39.1 38.0 LI028 20.9 44.7 22.6 54.9 0.0 37.2 56.5 21.9 34.7 25.3 LI029 65.8 56.5 35.8 64.7 17.5 56.8 39.1 23.2 36.2 53.9 LI030 55.0 59.2 39.6 57.8 19.6 63.7 56.5 34.2 36.2 53.9 LI031 42.6 51.3 30.1 67.6 0.0 56.8 56.5 30.1 31.8 41.2 LI032 58.9 69.7 43.3 65.6 17.5 58.8 91.3 52.0 43.4 66.6 P LI036 66.6 68.4 45.2 56.8 51.7 51.9 73.9 41.0 43.4 58.7 P LI037 51.1 51.3 24.5 63.7 19.6 52.9 39.1 19.1 36.2 38.0 LU101 36.4 68.4 79.2 69.6 0.0 58.8 91.3 43.8 30.4 33.3 P ME002 52.7 69.7 39.6 61.7 35.1 61.7 73.9 36.9 39.1 53.9 P ME003 41.0 51.3 32.0 62.7 0.0 48.0 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 P ME004 38.7 51.3 32.0 62.7 0.0 48.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 P ME005 44.1 71.0 47.1 62.7 15.5 64.7 91.3 47.9 34.7 41.2 P ME006 47.2 53.9 43.3 71.5 19.6 58.8 56.5 43.8 36.2 46.0 P ME008 65.8 76.3 41.5 58.8 51.7 60.7 73.9 41.0 39.1 58.7 P ME011 64.3 77.6 49.0 63.7 31.0 66.6 91.3 52.0 47.8 63.4 P ME015 26.3 44.7 22.6 52.9 0.0 40.1 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 ME016 34.8 56.5 30.1 61.7 19.6 49.0 73.9 32.8 39.1 46.0 NCO02 27.1 3.9 32.0 66.6 0.0 54.9 39.1 12.3 44.9 42.8 NCO03 35.6 46.0 24.5 59.8 0.0 49.0 47.8 35.6 65.2 50.7 NCO04 34.8 18.4 24.5 60.7 11.3 51.9 47.8 21.9 59.4 50.7 NCO05 21.7 18.4 37.7 51.9 5.1 36.2 13.0 43.8 82.6 34.9 P NCO06 34.8 3.9 32.0 66.6 0.0 54.9 39.1 15.0 44.9 42.8 Model modified from Wisconsin original 18 (Table 3. Model scores for all freshwater wetlands, cont'd) WETLAND Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ*PRIME NCO07 53.4 56.5 41.5 68.6 0.0 60.7 56.5 34.2 40.5 58.7 NCO08 29.4 44.7 32.0 44.1 3.1 31.3 13.0 39.7 72.4 34.9 PB009 65.1 71.0 69.8 73.5 16.5 66.6 91.3 52.0 52.1 76.1 PBO12 41.8 68.4 75.4 66.6 14.4 56.8 91.3 47.9 39.1 53.9 P PBO14 22.4 2.6 69.8 59..8 0.0 43.1 56.5 19.1 34.7 25.3 PH003 37.9 57.8 37.7 56.8 0.0 56.8 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 P PH004 34.8 60.5 52.8 66.6 0.0 56.8 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 P PH005 50.3 57.8 45.2 53.9 15.5 53.9 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 P PH006 29.4 51.3 35.8 54.9 0.0 44.1 56.5 19.1 43.4 38.0 PH007 44.1 50.0 35.8 62.7 0.0 45.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 TA002 31.0 50.0 28.3 56.8 0.0 44.1 73.9 41.0 34.7 33.3 TA004 61.2 69.7 60.3 64.7 14.4 60.7 73.9 49.3 43.4 58.7 TA007 32.5 3.9 20.7 58.8 0.0 51.9 39.1 12.3 27.5 25.3 TA008 30.2 46.0 30.1 47.0 0.0 47.0 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 TA011 56.5 56.5 28.3 69.6 0.0 59.8 56.5 34.2 36.2 53.9 TA012 47.2 47.3 22.6 62.7 19.6 50.9 32.6 24.6 27.5 34.9 TA015 57.3 72.3 50.9 50.0 44.8 44.1 30.4 71.2 86.9 63.4 P TA017 59.6 57.8 30.1 51.9 11.3 58.8 34.7 35.6 42.0 41.2 P TA018 53.4 47.3 28.3 54.9 13.4 52.9 47.8 32.8 55.0 66.6 P TA019 35.6 52.6 32.0 64.7 0.0 48.0 73.9 32.8 39.1 38.0 TA020 43.4 52.6 26.4 60.7 17.5 44.1 56.5 26.0 39.1 46.0 P TA023 20.1 3.9 32.0 60.7 0.0 44.1 56.5 19.1 34.7 25.3 TA025 34.8 38.1 30.1 37.2 17.5 39.2 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 TA026 34.1 44.7 62.2 58.8 0.0 41.1 56.5 21.9 34.7 38.0 TA027 45.7 64.4 37.7 68.6 19.6 63.7 56.5 30.1 31.8 41.2 TA030 84.4 72.3 54.7 64.7 22.7 68.6 65.2 43.8 59.4 71.4 P TA033 34.1 61.8 33.9 62.7 17.5 49.0 73.9 32.8 26.0 28.5 TA034 53.4 65.7 39.6 62.7 17.5 56.8 73.9 41.0 39.1 53.9 TA036 65.8 64.4 37.7 61.7 19.6 65.6 56.5 34.2 40.5 66.6 P TA037 46.5 59.2 50.9 67.6 0.0 57.8 73.9 36.9 39.1 53.9 P TA039 48.0 56.5 30.1 61.7 19.6 49.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 53.9 P TA040 48.8 59.2 33.9 65.6 17.5 50.0 73.9 36.9 43.4 53.9 TA042 47.2 68.4 37.7 65.6 17.5 59.8 73.9 36.9 47.8 55.5 TA045 77.5 76.3 54.7 68.6 35.1 74.5 73.9 53.4 49.2 76.1 P TA046 27.1 46.0 13.2 57.8 0.0 50.0 39.1 15.0 31.8 25.3 TA047 48.8 47.3 45.2 66.6 0.0 54.9 39.1 19.1 36.2 46.0 P TA048 24.0 56.5 30.1 47.0 22.7 34.3 13.0 53.4 63.7 33.3 P TA049 47.2 64.4 39.6 61.7 39.3 55.8 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 P TA050 43.4 47.3 28.3 59.8 0.0 53.9 47.8 28.7 50.7 53.9 P TA051 41.8 47.3 28.3 63.7 0.0 56.8 47.8 31.5 46.3 49.2 P TA052 20.1 5.2 41.5 65.6 0.0 50.0 56.5 21.9 30.4 28.5 TA054 44.1 57.8 75.4 63.7 0.0 51.9 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 P TA055 41.8 75.0 35.8 65.6 17.5 58.8 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 TA056 53.4 64.4 47.1 55.8 10.3 69.6 65.2 46.5 46.3 57.1 P TA057 64.3 82.8 58.4 64.7 35.1 67.6 91.3 52.0 47.8 71.4 P TA058 58.9 64.4 50.9 64.7 13.4 67.6 65.2 43.8 55.0 66.6 P TA060 67.4 75.0 56.6 68.6 39.3 63.7 91.3 52.0 43.4 66.6 P TA064 45.7 63.1 49.0 64.7 17.5 52.9 73.9 36.9 34.7 49.2 P Model modified from Wisconsin original 19 (Table 3. Model scores for all freshwater wetlands, cont'd) WETLAND Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ*PRIME TA067 40.3 64.4 39.6 60.7 15.5 56.8 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 P TA068 52.7 59.2 50.9 68.6 0.0 67.6 56.5 30.1 31.8 41.2 P TA070 30.2 60.5 39.6 65.6 0.0 54.9 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 TA077 82.9 68.4 37.7 57.8 18.6 62.7 65.2 52.0 55.0 71.4 P TA078 86.0 78.9 56.6 63.7 37.9 70.5 65.2 43.8 50.7 66.6 P TA079 76.7 69.7 39.6 60.7 31.0 64.7 56.5 42.4 40.5 58.7 P TA080 68.9 63.1 54.7 62.7 17.5 60.7 56.5 42.4 31.8 53.9 P TA082 44.9 56.5 33.9 62.7 0.0 49.0 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 TA084 72.8 73.6 49.0 68.6 17.5 72.5 73.9 45.2 36.2 66.6 P TA085 62.0 27.6 32.0 62.7 17.5 56.8 56.5 31.5 40.5 58.7 P TA088 65.1 56.5 54.7 62.7 191.6 57.8 56.5 34.2 40.5 66.6 P TA090 51.9 59.2 37.7 64.7 0.0 60.7 56.5 30.1 36.2 46.0 P TA092 86.8 81.5 73.5 64.7 37.9 74.5 82.6 54.7 50.7 66.6 P TA093 60.4 59.2 50.9 60.7 0.0 64.7 65.2 43.8 46.3 61.9 P TA094 76.7 64.4 79.2 60.7 8.2 66.6 82.6 54.7 59.4 71.4 P TA096 47.2 51.3 30.1 65.6 0.0 49.0 73.9 36.9 43.4 50.7 TA097 39.5 61.8 33.9 60.7 17.5 49.0 60.8 31.5 26.0 28.5 WA002 28.6 51.3 28.3 58.8 0.0 45.0 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 WA003 36.4 51.3 52.8 64.7 0.0 46.0 56.5 21.9 39.1 41.2 P WA004 31.7 51.3 49.0 63.7 0.0 47.0 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 WA012 65.8 73.6 66.0 65.6 28.9 59.8 91.3 52.0 52.1 76.1 P WA016 44.1 61.8 58.4 68.6 14.4 50.0 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 P WA019 37.9 59.2 45.2 58.8 0.0 57.8 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 WA021 50.3 61.8 41.5 62.7 15.5 50.0 73.9 36.9 43.4 58.7 WA025 68.2 75.0 64.1 70.5 17.5 68.6 91.3 52.0 47.8 68.2 P WA028 48.8 64.4 71.6 57.8 14.4 58.8 73.9 36.9 47.8 55.5 P WN101 77.5 81.5 45.2 70.5 65.5 71.5 73.9 53.4 49.2 76.1 P WN102 51.1 68.4 64.1 58.8 48.2 49.0 56.5 26.0 39.1 46.0 P WN103 62.0 9.2 66.0 59.8 14.4 46.0 56.5 27.3 47.8 71.4 P WN104 52.7 51.3 37.7 58.8 17.5 44.1 56.5 26.0 52.1 55.5 P WN105 38.7 9.2 45.2 59.8 17.5 46.0 56.5 19.1 39.1 38.0 P WN106 74.4 63.1 39.6 52.9 58.6 56.8 56.5 34.2 49.2 68.2 WN107 31.0 46.0 24.5 63.7 0.0 45.0 56.5 21.9 34.7 33.3 WN108 59.6 60.5 28.3 53.9 58.6 49.0 39.1 23.2 40.5 58.7 P WN110 38.7 60.5 35.8 46.0 17.2 39.2 17.3 30.1 31.8 20.6 WN111 55.8 51.3 24.5 50.0 9.3 47.0 47.8 32.8 50.7 66.6 P WN112 61.2 55.2 43.3 51.9 11.3 60.7 47.8 32.8 55.0 74.6 P WN113 49.6 50.0 56.6 59.8 14.4 50.0 39.1 19.1 36.2 46.0 P WN114 32.5 57.8 43.3 48.0 5.1 42.1 13.0 39.7 72.4 46.0 P WN115 45.7 14.4 66.0 57.8 22.7 46.0 39.1 20.5 65.2 79.3 P WN116 50.3 7.8 64.1 64.7 16.5 54.9 26.0 10.9 27.5 33.3 P WN117 21.7 13.1 64.1 50.9 4.1 35.2 0.0 31.5 59.4 12.6 P WN119 55.0 80.2 49.0 57.8 35.1 62.7 73.9 41.0 34.7 53.9 P WN120 66.6 71.P 58.4 71.5 19.6 73.5 73.9 45.2 44.9 76.1 P Model modified from Wisconsin original 20 (Table 3. Model scores for all freshwater wetlands, cont'd) WETLAND Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi" WQual Econ Recr'. Aest'. Educ*PRIME WN121 77.5 75.0 50.9 66.6 65.5 67.6 56.5 42.4. 44.9 71.4 P WN123 70.5 82.8 60.3 66.6 58.6 64.7 91.3 60.2 52.1 76.1 P WN124 41.0 9.2 66.0 57.8 12.4 50.9 26.0 10.9 23.1 20.6 P WN125 53.4 56.5 37.7 49.0 24.8 43.1 34.7 46.5 69.5 53.9 P WN126 63.5 69.7 39.6 61.7 65.5 55.8 60.8 35.6 26.0 41.2 P WN127 44.9 51.3 24.5 53.9 11.3 50.0 47.8 -28.7 46.3 46.0 P WN128 61.2 73.6 47.1 60.7 17.5 60.7 73.9 41.0 43.4 58.7 P WN129 56.5 75.0 35.8 67.6 39.3 60.7 73.9 41.0 43.4 66.6 P WN130 41.0 56.5 32.0 66.6 17.5 50.9 73.9 36.9 34.7 41.2 P WN132 43.4 59.2 37.7 66.6 0.0 55.8 73.9 36.9 39.1 46.0 P WN134 49.6 50.0 30.1 51.9 13.4 39.2 56.5 26.0 39.1 46.0 WN135 20.1 2.6 30.1 55.8 0.0 39.2 56.5 19.1 34.7 33.3 WT002 31.7 56.5 35.8 62.7 0.0 50.9 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 WT003 37.2 64.4 37.7 62.7 19.6 59.8 73.9 32.8 34.7 33.3 P WT004 27.1 55.2 28.3 63.7 0.0 49.0 73.9 32.8 30.4 28.5 P WT005 56.5 43.4 47.1 6.3.7 10.3 48.0 47.8 41.0 55.0 58.7 P Biol Biological function, includes productivity and wildlife habitat Hydro Hydrological support, ability to maintain flow during dry periods GrWat Ground-Water, ability to provide ground water recharge Flood Flood & storm water storage during heavy runoff periods ShoL* Shore Line protection from erosion WQual Water Quality maintenance, ability to renovate water quality Econ Economic values, primarily timber or hay Recr* Recreational values, public access to fish, game or nature Aest* Aesthetic values, degree of scenic appeal Educ* Educational value, provide public with accessible wetland ecology Model modified from Wisconsin original 21 Table 4. Wetland model ranking by thirds. Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ* AW002 M M M M L M H M M M AW003 H H H H M M H H H H AW004 M H M M H M H M M M BA001 H H M L H H M H H H BA002 M M M M M H H H M H BA003 H H M L H M H H H H BA004 M M H H M M H M H M BA005 H H H H H H H H H H BA006 M H H H M M H M L M BA007 L M M H L M M L L M BA008 H H H H M H H H H H BAOIO H H H H M H H H H H BE004 M L M H H M L L M M BE005 L L M H L H M M H M BE007 L M L L M L L H H L BE008 M M L H L L H M L M BE012 H H M H M H H H H H BE013 L L L M L L M L L L BE014 L M H H M M H M L L BE015 H H H M M M H H H H BE016 H H H H L H H H H H BE017 M M H H M H M M M BE018 M M M L M M H M H M BRO02 L L H M L L H M L L BWOOI M M H M L M H M L M BWO02 M L H L M L M L M M BWO03 L L H H L M H M L L BWO04 M H H H M H H M L M BWO05 L L H H L M H M L L BWO06 L L H H L L H M L L CA003 M H M L M M H M L M CA004 H H H H M M H H H H CA005 H H H L M M M H H H CA015 L L H M L L H M L L CA016 L L L M L L H M L L CA020 L L H L L L M L L L CA021 M M H H M M M L L L CA024 H H H M H M H H H H CA025 L M H H L L H M L L DR001 H H L M H H H H M H DR002 L L H L L L L L M L DR003 M M H H M M H M L M DR004 M M H H L H H M L M H Model score in upper third of wetlands rated. M Model score in middle third of wetlands rated. L Model score in lower third of wetlands rated. Model modified from Wisconsin original 22 Table 4. Wetland model ranking by thirds. Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ* DR005 M M H H L M H M M M DR006 M L H H L M H M M M DR007 L L H M L L H M L L DR010 H M H H M M L M H H DR011 L L H H L L M L L L DR012 H M H H M M H H H H DR013 M M H M M L H M M M DR014 L L L L L L M L L L DR015 L M L H H L M L L L DR016 L L L L L L H M M L DR018 H H M L H M H H H H DR019 M M M M M H M H H H DR022 L M L L M L L L L L DR023 L L L L M L L L L L DR026 L L H L L L H M L L DR027 M M H L H L H H H M HAO02 L L M L M L M L L L HAO03 L L L M L L H M L L HAO04 H H M M H M H H H H HAO05 L L M L M L L H H L HAO06 M L M L M M L L H M HAO07 M M M L M L L H H M HAO08 L M M M L L H M L L HAO09 H L H M M M L L M H HAO10 L L H H L L M L L L HAO11 H H H H M H H H M H HAO15 L L M L L L L L M L HAO17 M M M L H M M L M H HAO18 H H H H M H H H H H HA021 L M L L M L H M M L HA024 M M H H L H M L M M HA025 M L L H L M M L M M HA028 H H H H M H H H H H HA030 L M L M L L H M L L HA032 H H M M H M H H H H HA034 M M M M L H H M M M HU003 L M H L H L L L L L HU004 L M L L M M M L L L HU005 L L H M L L H M L L HU006 L M H L L M H M M L LI003 M M M H L M H H M M LI004 M L M H L M L L L M LI005 H H M M H H M M M M H Model score in upper third of wetlands rated. M Model score in middle third of wetlands rated. L Model score in lower third of wetlands rated. Model modified from Wisconsin original 23 Table 4. Wetland model ranking by thirds. Model 1 2 3 4 @5 6 7 8 9 10 Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ* LI006 H M H L M L L H H H LI007 M H M H L H H H M M LI008 M M H H M M H M L M LI009 L M H H L L H M L L LI010 L L L M L L M L L L LIOll H H H L H H M H H H LI012 M M M L M M M L M M LI013 M H M H M H H H H M LI014 L M H L L M H M L L LI015 M H, M H H H H M L M LI016 M H H M M H M L L L LI017 H M H H H H M M M H LI018 H H L M H H L L H H LI019 H H H H H H H H M H LI020 M M M L L M H M L M LI021 H H M M M H M M L M LI022 M L L L M M L L H M LI023 M L L L M L L M H M LI024 H H M L H H H H H H LI025 L L L L L L L L L L LI026 M M L H M M L L H H LI027 L L M L L M H L M L LI028 L L L L L L M L L L LI029 H M L H M M L L M H LI030 H M M L H H M M M H LI031 M L L H L M M L L M LI032 H H M H M H H H H H LI036 H H M L H M H H H H LI037 M L L M H M L L M L LU101 L H H H L H H H L L ME002 M H M M H H H M M H ME003 M L L M L L H M L M ME004 L L L M L L H M L L MEb05 M H M M M H H H L M ME006 M M M H H H M H M M ME008 H H M L H H H H M H ME011 H H M M H H H H H H ME015 L L L L L L M L L L ME016 L M L M H L H M M M NCO02 L L L H L M L L H M NCO03 L L L L L L L M H M NCO04 L L L M M M L L H M NCO05 L L M L M L L H H L H Model score in upper third of wetlands rated. M Model score in middle third of wetlands rated. L Model score in lower third of wetlands rated. Model modified from Wisconsin original 24 Table 4. Wetland model ranking by thirds. Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ* NCO06 L L L H L M L L H M NCO07 H M M H L H M M M H NCO08 L L L L M L L H H L PB009 H H H H M H H H H H PBO12 M H H H M M H H M H PBO14 L L H L L L M L L L PH003 L M M L L M H M L L PH004 L M H H L M H M L L PH005 M M M L M M H M M M PH006 L L L L L L M L H L PH007 M L L M L L H M M M TA002 L L L L L L H H L L TA004 H H H H M H H H H H TA007 L L L L L M L L L L TA008 L L L L L L M L L L TA011 H M L H L H M M M H TA012 M L L M H M L L L L TA015 H H M L H L L H H H TA017 H M L L M H L M M M TA018 H L L L M M L M H H TA019 L M L H L L H M M L TA020 M M L M M L M L M M TA023 L L L M L L M L L L TA025 L L L L M L M L L L TA026 L L H L L L M L L L TA027 M H M H H H M L L M TA030 H H H H H H M H H H TA033 L M L M M L H M L L TA034 H H M M M M H H M H TA036 H H M M H H M M M H TA037 M M M H L H H M M H TA039 M M L M H L H M M H TA040 M M L H M M H M H H TA042 M H M H M H H M H H TA045 H H H H H H H H H H TA046 L L L L L M L L L L TA047 M L M H L M L L M M TA048 L M L L H L L H H L TA049 M H M M H M H M M M TA050 M L L L L M L L H H TA051 M L L M L M L L H M TA052 L L M H L M M L L L TA054 M M H M L M H M L M H Model score in upper third of wetlands rated. M Model score in middle third of wetlands rated. L Model score in lower third of wetlands rated. Model modified from Wisconsin original 25 Table 4. Wetland model ranking by thirds. Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLil. WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ* TA055 M H L H M H H M M M TA056 H H M L M H M H H H TA057 H H H H H H H H H H TA058 H H M H M H M H H H TA060 H H H H H H H H H H TA064 M M M H M M H M L M TA067 M H M M M M H M L M TA068 M M M H L H M L L M TA070 L M M H L M H M L L TA077 H H M L H H M H H H TA078 H H H M H H M H H H TA079 H H M M H H M H M H TA080 H M H M M H M H L H TA082 M M L M L L H M M M TA084 H H M H M H H H M H TA085 H L L M M M M L M H TA088 H M H M H H M M M H TA090 M M M H L H M L M M TA092 H H H H H H H H H H TA093 H M M M L H M H H H TA094 H H H M M H H H H H TA096 M L L H L L H M H M TA097 M M L M M L M L L L WA002 L L L L L L M L L L WA003 L L H H L L M L M M WA004 L L M M L L H M L L WA012 H H H H H H H H H H WA016 M M H H M M H M L M WA019 L M M L L H H M L L WA021 M M M M M M H M H H WA025 H H H H M H H H H H WA028 M H H L M H H M H H WN101 H H M H H H H H H H WN102 M H H L H L M L M M WN103 H L H L M L M L H H WN104 M L M L M L M L H H WN105 L L M L M L M L M L WN106 H M M L H M M M H H WN107 L L L M L L M L L L WN108 H M L L H L L L M H WN110 L M L L M L L L L L WN111 H L L L M L L M H H WN112 H M M L M H L M H H H Model score in upper third of wetlands rated. M Model score in middle third of wetlands rated. L Model score in lower third of wetlands rated. Model modified from Wisconsin original 26 Table 4. Wetland model ranking by thirds. Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest* Educ* WN113 M- L H L M M L L M M WN114 L M M L M L L H H M WN115 M L H L H L L L H H WN116 M L H H M M L L L L WN117 L L H L M L L L H L WN119 H H M L H H H H L H WN120 H H H H H H H H H H WN121 H H M H H H M H H H WN123 H H H H H H H H H H WN124 M L H L M M L L L L WN125 H M M L H L L H H H WN126 H H M M H M M M L M WN127 M L L L M M L L H M WN128 H H M M M H H H H H WN129 H H L H H H H H H H WN130 M M L H M M H M L M WN132 M M M H L M H M M M WN134 M L L L M L M L M M WN135 L L L L L L M L L L WT002 L M L M L M H M L L WT003 L H M M H H H M L L WT004 L M L M L L H M L L WT005 H L M M M L L H H H H Model score in upper third of wetlands rated. M Model score in middle third of wetlands rated. L Model score in lower third of wetlands rated. Model modified from Wisconsin original 27 2.6 REVIEWING A PROPOSED PROJECT; AN EXAMPLE A hypothetical subdivision is pr oposed for cluster condo- miniums on 50 acres bordering on the hypothetical "Sally Brook". Under the town zoning, single family standard lots would cut the property into long thin lots with little frontage, and with rears bordering on the wetland and brook. The developer's proposal would place most of the buildings around some old orchards and abandoned hayfields, leaving dedicated open land along the wetlands and brook, with nature trails connected to town conservation land. The proposal seems attractive from the standpoint of land planning and wetlands protection, but there are two logistic problems: a great deal of pressure to deny the project has been placed on the town planning board since the location of the proposed buildings would be visible on the horizon to many old (and some wealthy) residents, and the access road would have to cross the wetland. The fill for the wetland crossing would require a state wetlands board (NHSWB) permit but would impact less than one acre of wetlands, therefore not requiring an individual federal dredge & fill permit from the COE under �404-c. Using a road map, the town Conservation Commission locates the proposed subdivision on the wetlands aerial photo map No 5-10. The hypothetical wetland in question has the code number "SA101" and is fairly large. The CC members look in the previous section Table 3: WETLAND MODEL ABBREVIATION: CODE: Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aestl@ Educ*PRIME SA101 65.1 61.8 28.3 65.6 17.5 56.8 56.5 42.4 40.5 66.6 In table 4 they see: Wetland Biol Hydro GrWat Flood ShLi* WQual Econ Recr* Aest" Educ* SA101 H M L H M M M H M H They note high results in the biological, flood control, recreational and education models. Most of the others are medium in rank, but less critical. 28 Next the CC checks with the NH Fish and Game Department and determines that Sally Brook and the ensuing watershed are important brook trout fisheries for the coast. Three model results are important to support this fishery. The biological value (Biol: H) shows high biological productivity as well as-wildlife habitat. The hydrologic support score (Hydro: M) shows that the wetland contributes somewhat to downstream base flow during the time of year when trout are most sensitive to heat stress. Any pollutants (heavy metals, nutrients, some salts) present in runoff will be significantly attenuated by the wetland (WQual: M), protecting the water quality of the fish habitat. The wetland also ranks in the upper third for recreational and educational values. These facts are important in weighing probable impacts, and should be presented as factual findings to the NHSWB and the COE as a routine part of the town's review process. Suggestions for appropriate orders of conditions might include: preserve vegetated setbacks from this brook and wetland, shading along the bank to prevent solar heating, and protection from erosion and sedimentation, both during construction and after project completion. The site soils will determine how critical the erosion problem will become. If there are silts and clays present (especially from glacial lake or marine sediments) the soils will be easily erodable. Work on steeply sloped areas must be minimized, with the wetlands protected by silt curtains or at least hay bales, trenched, staked and maintained, until revegetation is well advanced. Wildlife habitat can be somewhat protected from development by the preservation of densely vegetated strips, connecting preserved wild areas, for wildlife to use as travel corridors. More detailed ecolo- gical information about each wetland is described and summarized in tables in Appendix Section 4.0; a sample for our hypothetical wetland, SA101, is shown next (Table 5). This example provides a sample of the representative species lists included in this study. The second page can also be used for the soils information (left column, look up soils numbers in Rockingham County Soils Survey, SCS, 1986). Table 5. Sample hypothetical ecological summary 29 Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-10) Jct Bridal Path and Route 1, HA SA101 Field Date: 04/01/86 Report Date: 06/23/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 1 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T 3 Quercus velutina Black oak 1 0.00 T 4 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Quercus bicolor Swamp white oak 1 1.00 T 4 Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.82 S 1 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 4 0.50 S 0 Lyonia ligustrina Maleberry 1 1.00 S 0 Acer rubrum Red maple 12 0.50 S 3 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 15 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 6 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 4 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 35 1.00 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 5 0.82 S 3 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 2 0.50 S 0 Salix sp. Willow 3 0.82 S 1 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 S 3 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 8 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium macrocarpon Large cranberry 1 1.00 S 2 Carex sp. Sedge 5 1.00 H 3 Calamagrostis canadensis Bluejoint grass 1 1.00 H 0 Aster sp, Asters 2 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 4 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 5 1.00 H 1 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 1 1.00 H 0 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 2 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 6 1.00 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 12 H 1 Iris versicolor Blue flag 1 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.843 WFV: 0.311 BOG: 0.006 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.13 BUSHY: 0.48 COMPACT: 0.07 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.04 BROADL: 0.02 NARROW: 0.17 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPRUW WATERSHED: Sally Brook TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------- ----- ------------ ------- ----- ------------ 1 Biol 65.1 6 WQual 56.8 2 Hydro 61.8 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 28.3 8 Recr 42.4 4 Flood 65.6 9 Aest 40.5 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 66.6 ------- ------ -- --- ------- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.60 (Table 5. cont'd, Sample ecological summary) 30 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: SA101 PLACE: (Photo 5-10) Jct Bridal Path and Route 1, HA FL DATe 04/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: VACMAC 1 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB 1 GS&ABUN 21: CAREX 5 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 22: CALCAN 1 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 QUEVEL 1 GS&ABUN 23: ASTER 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 24: ONOSEN 4 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 QUEBIC 1 GS&ABUN 25: TYPLAT 5 GS&ABUN 6 uLMAME 2 GS&ABUN 26: LYTSAL 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 RHAFRA 4 GS&ABUN 27: SCICYP 2 WSI: 0.843 GS&ABUN 8 LYOLIG 1 GS&ABUN 28: JUNEFF 6 WFV: 0.312 GS&ABUN 9 aCERUB12 GS&ABUN 29: POa 12 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ILEVER15 GS&ABUN 30: IRIVER I NO. of species: 30 GS&ABUN 11: ROSPAL 6 INVestigator : TLP Prime : GS&ABUN 12: VIBREC 4 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.089 GS&ABUN 13: ALNRUG35 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 146 GS&ABUN 14: CORAMO 5 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SPITOM 2 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.041 GS&ABUN 16: sALIX 3 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.692 GS&ABUN 17: pINSTR 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.267 GS&ABUN 18: VACCOR 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.007 GS&ABUN 19: SPILAT 8 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :SA101 OUTlet2 (APE) :E 2 letter TOWN codes*:HA P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 29 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 397 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook 31 3.0 MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON COASTAL WETLANDS This section provides users with more details on definitions, processes and analyses of freshwater wetlands (Section 3.1), salt marshes (Section 3.2) and sand dunes (Section 3.3). The results of specific site investigations are found in the three later sections for freshwater wetlands (Section 4.0), salt marshes (Section 5.0) and sand dunes (Section 6.0). 3.1 FRESHWATER WETLANDS 3.1.1 Wetland Boundary Definitions State and federal criteria define wetlands by four parameters, using vegetation as the primary indicator of wetland communities unless the area has been recently disturbed (vegetation, soils, hydrology and topography). Wetlands are areas occupied by plants specially adapted to saturated soils; soil must be saturated during the growing season, especially the upper foot. Wetlands are deemed worthy of protection due to the benefits they provide, including: prevention of downstream flooding; provision of wildlife habitat, including critical habitat and protection for threatened or endangered species of plants and animals; groundwater recharge protection; attenuation of pollution from surface waters; and educational, scientific, historic and aesthetic values. Plants are grouped into categories of hydrologic preference (wet or dry) for each geographic area of the USA. Plant species found more than 95% of their occurrences in wetlands are called Obligate Hydrophytes, and assigned a wetland frequency of 100%. Those occurring less than 5*/10 of the time in wetlands are called "Upland" species and given a 0% wetland frequency. The US Fish & Wildlife service has described three intermediate (Facultative) classes between these two groups: those flexible species occurring seldom in wetlands (FACU, 32 wetland frequencies from 6% to 33%, category median frequency of 18%), those occurring equally between uplands and wetlands (FAC, frequencies ranging from 33 to 66%, median frequency of 50%) and those preferring wetlands (FACW, frequencies from 67% through 95%, median value 82%). For purposes of confirming the plant community structure, NAI has prepared an ecological summary for each of the wetlands evaluated. This lists all the species identified during the visit, up to but not beyond thirty representative species. Each species is assigned a percent cover value, representing its abundance for the overall site. The hydrologic categories for all the species are then weighted by the total relative abundance of each to arrive at a single index of plant community wetness: the Wetland Site Index (WSI) listed directly below each plant list for reference. Because of the computation method, the values can only range between 0 and 1.00, representing perfect uplands and wetlands respectively. Values below 0.50 indicate upland communi- ties; values between 0.5 and 1.0 are typical of all wetlands studied to date. 3.1.2 Wetland Ecology and Hydrolog For the purposes of discussion, three freshwater wetland communities are recognized in New Hampshire. Grading from driest to wettest: swamp, marsh and bog. Swamps are dominated by woody vegetation and are further subdivided into Shrub and Wooded swamps, based on the height of the dominant woody plants being less than or greater than 15 feet. Marshes are dominated by herbaceous (non-woody) plants, and are divided into shallow (typically with cattails, sedges, and grasses) or deep marshes (typically with water lilies, pondweeds, pickerelweed and arrowheads). 33 Bogs are a special plant community where the woo dy vegetation forms a floating root mat which rises and falls with the water level (Table 6). Bogs usually encroach from the edge to the center.of a pond or lake. They may be rooted in no soil whatever. The plants are specialized to survive in a very wet environment with acid water and little or no nutrients (fixed nitrogen or available phosphorus). Most bogs are dominated chemically by Sphagnum moss which acidifies the water and forms a thick sponge among the roots of the woody plants. Bogs are valued more highly than other wetlands in New Hampshire because in addition to the other benefits they provide, they are high in aesthetic and educational values and yet are extremely sensitive to disturbances. Disruptions of the hydrology or the water quality are quickly fatal to bogs. Increased nutrients from lawn fertilizers, failing septic systems, or farmland runoff are also fatal but take several years to become apparent. At first, the increased nutrient levels increase the growth of the bog species, but there follows the development of and eventual dominance of marsh species such as loosestrife, sedges, grasses and cattails over the slower-growing bog plants. In either case the regeneration of a bog can take centuries. 34 Table 6. Indicator Plant Species for Bogs GENUS SPECIES COMMON NAME TYPE -------- --- -------- ---- ---- Sphagnum sp Sphagnum moss Herb Picea mariana Black spruce Tree Picea mariana Black spruce Shrub Larix laricina Tamarack Shrub .Larix laricina Tamarack Tree Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic white cedar Shrub Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic white cedar Tree Eriophorum sp. Cottongrass Herb Eriophorum spissum Cottongrass Herb Eriophorum viridi-carinatum Green-keeled cottongrass Herb Eriophorum virginicum Tawny cottongrass Herb Cypripedium arietinum Ram's head lady's-slipper Herb Cypripedium parviflorum Small yel. lady's-slipper Herb Platanthera sp. Orchid Herb Platanthera clavellata Sm. green wood orchid Herb Platanthera flava Tubercled orchid Herb Platanthera hyperborea Northern green orchid Herb Platanthera dilatata Bog candle Herb Platanthera blephariglottis White-fringed orchid Herb Platanthera psychodes Sm.purple fring.orchid Herb Platanthera grandiflora Lar.purple fring. orchid Herb Pogonia ophioglossoides Rose pogonia Herb Calopogon tuberosus Grass pink Herb Arethusa bulbosa Arethusa Herb Spiranthes lucida Shining ladies' tresses Herb Spiranthes romanzoffiana Hooded ladies' tresses Herb Listera cordata Heart-leaved twayblade Herb Listera convallarioides Broad-leaved twayblade Herb Malaxis monophylla White adder's mouth Herb Malaxis unifolia Green adder's mouth Herb Calypso bulbosa Calypso Herb Sarracenia purpurea Pitcher plant Herb Drosera intermedia Spatulate-leaf sundew Herb Drosera rotundifolia Round-leaf sundew Herb Drosera filiformis Dew-thread Herb Parnassia glauca Grass of parnassus Herb Ericaceae Heath family All Ledum groenlandicum Labrador tea Shrub Rhododendron canadense Rhodora Shrub Kalmia polifolia Bog laurel Shrub Andromeda glaucophylla Bog rosemary Shrub Chamaedaphne calyculata Leatherleaf Shrub Arctostaphylos alpina Alpine bearberry Shrub Vaccinium vitis-idaea Mountain cranberry Shrub Vaccinium oxycoccos Small cranberry Shrub Vaccinium macrocarpon Large cranberry Shrub Menyanthes trifoliata Common buckbean Herb Aster nemoralis Bog aster Herb 35 3.1.3 Freshwater Wetlands Results and Impacts Of the 238 above-average wetlands evaluated in the study area, 153 were Wooded swamps (WSI range: 0.51 to 0.87); 41 were shrub swamps (WSI range: 0.61 to 0.91); 24 were shallow marshes (WSI range: 0.79 to 1.00), 9 were open water wetlands (WSI range 0.60 to 0.94); 4 were deep marshes (WSI range: 0.81 to 0.95); 4 were wet meadows.(WSI range: 0.71 to 0.97); 2 were brookside wetlands (WSI 0.57 and 0.82) and only one was a bog (WN115, North Hampton, WSI = 0.83). However, some of the swamps and marshes contained bogs within them. To alert users to the presence of bog indicator species in other wetlands, each ecological summary adds the relative abundances for any plant species in Table 6 and lists the total value immediately below the species list. The presence of any number but 0.000 following the word "BOG" indicates the presence of species on this list. In many cases, this simply represents Sphagnum moss in with the other wetland species, but in some cases it indicates a sensitive species which may be a relic from when the wetland was much wetter. Towns with bogs, some of which may be too small to have been evaluated by this study, should move to protect them from hydrologic or pollutant impacts, in addition to adding them to a list of prime wetlands. Those occurring in sandy areas are particularly susceptible to irreversible pollution from septic systems. Any source of sediment, nutrients or pollutant or any disruption to the regional hydrology such as inadequate culverts, beaver dams, ditching, or additional runoff sources can quickly end a bog's long life. Bogs should also be checked at least once every two weeks during every summer for rare orchids which can only grow in these sterile, acid waters, and which make the bog more valuable as a state resource. Impacts to other freshwater wetland communities are much more readily dealt with, since they can be reversed and are of a much shorter duration. Marshes readjust to ditching, cutting, and to minor siltation sources very quickly as long as the hydrology is restored to the same 36 regime (levels, flow rates, etc). Swamps, generally drier than other wetland communities, are the commonest wetland types in the state, and frequently suffer un-permitted impacts through logging operations, recreational uses (skiing, snowmobiling, skating) or siltation from nearby construction. Most wooded swamps in the study area can tolerate more impacts than other wetlands without the loss of public benefits, unless they possess some unusual wildlife or other fragile benefit. Exceptional to this generality are forested-wetlands with significant stands of black spruce (Picea tvarlana) or Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparls thyoldes). These are relic bog species and grow much more slowly than most trees. The latter species in particular has been decimated by all the sources of impact which injure bogs, as previously described, but also by overcutting because its rot-resistant wood has long been highly prized. Growing more slowly than hemlocks, pines and maples, the white cedar is frequently overtopped by these nutrient- loving species shortly after more fertile waters pass through a bog. It remains at a competitive disadvantage where it occurs today along the coast, near the northern limit of its range. Management to reinstate it is best accomplished by girdling the competing trees which threaten to shade it out. 3.1.4 Literature Guide to the designation of prime wetlands in New Hampshire. NHACC, Strafford RPC, and Env. Law Clinic. June 1983, available from NH Assoc. of Conservation Commissions. Identification,, documentation and mapping of prime tidal wetlands in the town of Hampton, NH. F. D. Richardson, Durham, NH December 1982. Coastal Program funded. Sipple, W. S. 1985. Wetland identification and delineation manual. Draft report. U.S. EPA. 37 IEP, Inc. 1985. Portsmouth wetland delineation and mapping project. June 1985. Coastal Program funded. Breeding, C.H.J., F. D. Richardson, and S. A. L. Pilgrim 1974. Soil survey of New Hampshire tidal marshes. NH Agr. Expt. Station, Durham, NH, and USDA SCS. New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Chap ter Wt 100, 200, 300, 400,500, eff. 10-83; and Wt 700 (Prime Wetlands) eff. 10-81. USGS Topographic maps, 712 minute quadrangles: Hampton, Portsmouth Kittery, Exeter, Newburyport East. Soils maps for each town: New Castle, Rye, Hampton, North Hampton, Hamp- ton Falls, and Seabrook. Available from SCS in Exeter, NH Aerial photos of the six towns flown March 31, 1986: 130 B/W photos, Flight #6105, J. W. Sewall Co. 38 3.2 SALT MARSHES Salt marshes, including freshwater tidal wetlands, are protected by New Hampshire law up to 3-1/2 feet above local mean high tide. These areas are of prime importance to estuarine and oceanic food chains. 3.2.1 Salt Marsh Development and Ecolog New Hampshire's salt marshes fall under Johnson's (1925) description of "New England type" marshes. They are still responding to the natural forces and events from which they were created. Factors influencing the initial formation of the marshes include the change in sea level, the tidal range, indigenous marsh vegetation, and the processes of sedimentation. A brief description of tidal marsh development and ecology is presented here. The development of New Hampshire's marshes began at the end of the last glaciation. The marginal retreat of the glacier was quite rapid, and the melting ice sheet caused a rapid rise in sea level. Six thousand five hundred years ago the sea level was within a few meters of its present level (Bloom, 1978; Nixon, 1982). A 1970 study on the Hampton-Seabrook marsh showed that the marsh peat was between 2,700 and 6,800 years old (Keene). Tidal marsh formation starts when wave and/or tide energy is reduced to the point where water-borne sediments settle out and accumulate upon the substrate. The wave energy is further reduced with the formation of a sand bar which later develops into a dune system. The protected waters behind this sand barrier slowly fill in from the edges with accumulated sediments brought in from the tide and from the upland runoff. Large mud and sand flats form and continue to increase in height. Once the flats reach mid-tide elevation the first 39 intertidal" marsh plants, Spartina alterniflora (salt marsh cord- grass), appear. Within 4 to 5 years, these grasses spread across the flats by rhizome and seeds, eventually developing major stands. With the spreading of cordgrass, the accumulation of sediments continues. The grasses themselves contribute to this accumulation by reducing the wave and tide energy and by trapping water-borne sediments. Yearly die-back of vegetation contributes organic material to the predominantly mineral sediment. Amidst these processes, the intertidal marsh grows in height and area, filling in any open water still present behind the sand barrier. Where the marsh reaches an elevation equal to mean high tide (MHW), the Spartina alterniflora is replaced by 2/Spartina patens (salt marsh hay), an indicator of "high marsh". This succession from mudflat to high marsh continues until the embayment behind the barrier beach is gradually transformed into the present tidal marsh and drainage creek system. Even after the open water behind the dunes is replaced with marsh peat, sediments accumulate as the sea level continues to rise. The increase in sea level causes tidal waters to flood upland areas which are then colonized by high marsh species (Mudge, 1862; Redfield, 1972; and Nixon, 1982). Evidence of this upland submergence and subsequent marsh development may be seen in the tidal creek of Fairhill Swamp in Rye where there are submerged stumps and roots of Atlantic white cedar. Similar remnants of a cedar forest can be seen at low tide in the cove just south of Odiorne Point. The border zone is formed where the high marsh and the upland or freshwater wetland converge. Such an area, intermediate between two communities, is called an ecotone. This zone is important because of its rich biological diversity; it contains some plant and animal species that inhabit both communities, as well as other species that are specifically indigenous to this narrow strip. Beyond its biological richness, the border zone is an integral part of the whole tidal marsh 40 system, and must be maintained to provide a "buffer zone" for the marsh proper (Richardson, 1982). Tidal freshwater marshes are located upstream from tidal saline marshes (salt marsh) and down stream from non-tidal freshwater wetlands. They are characterized by (1) near-freshwater conditions with an average annual salinity of .5 ppt or less, except during periods of extended drought, (2) plant and animal communities dominated by freshwater species, and (3) a daily lunar tidal fluctuation. The absence of dominant estuarine marsh grasses (Spartina spp.) differentiate tidal freshwater marshes from higher salinity marshes. Common species found in such systems are Spartina pectinata (freshwater cord grass), Panicum virgatum (switch grass), Phragmites communis (common reed), Scirpus spp., Typha spp. (cattail) Polygonum spp. Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) Iris versicolor (blue flag) and Impatiens capensis (jewelweed). Sediments in tidal freshwater marshes are high in clay, silt and organic matter, but generally low in peat and in total plant root biomass. This results in a higher susceptibility to erosion, low profile stream banks, and tidal creeks with low sinuosity compared to the estuarine marshes, which generally have high percentages of sand, peat and plant root materials. Tidal freshwater sediments are derived primarily from upstream sources. The vegetative changes from the subtidal zone to the upland border have been attributed to change in marsh elevation. The difference in elevation causes a change in the frequency and duration of tidal inundation. This affects ecological parameters such as saturation and drainage of marsh soils, nutrient and oxygen availability, and variation in temperature and salinity values and ranges. These parameters will determine the vegetative types for specific locations on the marsh, particularly the high marsh. 41 The many irregularities of the marsh surface can also affect species distribution. Levees are formed along the marsh drainage creeks through the deposition and accumulation of water-borne sediments as the water overflows the creek's banks and floods the marsh. The major depressions on the marsh are classified either as "pannes" or "pond holes". A "panne" is a shallow pool of standing water (10-30 cm in depth) interrupting the vegetated surface of the marshland. A it pondhole" is a deeper panne (30-100 cm) that holds water throughout the year and has nearly vertical sides (Redfield, 1972; Richardson,.1982). "Rotten spots" are large, irregularly shaped pannes surrounded by a series of smaller, shallower pannes. Many of these smaller pannes may be covered with Salicornia and/or the short form of Spartina alterniflora. Rotten spots seem to develop in areas that have inadequate drainage. The trapped, standing water kills the high marsh vegetation and apparently leads to the decomposition and subsidence of the underlying peat. Even though panne areas or rotten spots may indicate a degrading high marsh system these area also provide excellent feeding grounds for waterfowl and shorebirds. Ruppia maritima, a submersed aquatic, grows in the deeper pannes and pondholes. The leaves, shoots and seeds of this species provide food for foraging waterfowl. Ruppia also serves as an attachment substrate and shelter for invertebrates and small fish which are fed upon by such species as egret, heron and tern (Richardson, 1980). Table 7 lists plants considered to be typical to New Hampshire marshes. This list is taken from work by Richardson (1982) who felt that these species should be used as "indicators" of tidal marsh when mapping wetlands and delineating the border zone. Some of these species are found only in specific areas of the marsh; their occurrence is often related to marsh elevation. Others on this list 42 TABLE 7. Indicator Plant Species For Salt Marshes SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME HABITAT Aster subulatus Annual Salt Marsh Upland border of high Michx. Aster marsh. Aster tenuifolius Perennial Salt Marsh Upland border of high L. Aster marsh, uncommon. Atriplex glabriuscula Orach Common along creeks and Edmond. drainage ditches. Atriplex patula Orach Very common on high L. (vars.) marsh, along creeks, ditches & in strand line. Distichlis spicata Spike-grass Abundant on high marsh, (L.) Greene often in association with Spartina patens. Eleocarhis halophila Salt Marsh Spike- Occasional in wet Fern. & Brack. Rush depressions on high marsh. Gerardia maritima Salt Marsh Gerardia Edges of pannes and Raf. scattered on Spartina patens marsh. Glaux maritima Sea Milkwort Border of high marsh L. var. growing with Spartina obtusifolla patens. Juncus gerardi Black Grass Very abundant along the Loisel. upland border of high marsh either associated with Spartina patens or forming pure stands. Limonium nashii Sea Lavender or Scattered on high marsh, Small Marsh Rosemary forb pannes and along edges of high marsh. Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry Border zone. Loisel. 43 TABLE 7. (continued) SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME HABITAT Panicum virgatum Switchgrass Common in tufts along L. border zone. var. spissum Linder Phragmites communis Tall Reed Forming dense stands along marsh border and in disturbed or filled areas. Plantago oliganthos Seaside Plantain Scattered on high marsh R. & S. and in forb pannes. Potentilla anserina Silverweed Common especially along L. edges of high marsh. Puccinellia maritima Alkali Grass Scattered in clumps along (Huds.) Parl. ditches and on high marsh. Rosa rugosa Salt Spray Rose Clumps or thickets in the Thunb. border zone. Rosa viriniana Virginia Rose Border zone and upland. Mill. Ruppia maritima Ditch Grass Submersed in pond holes L. (vars.) and ditches in the high marsh. Sanguisorba canadensis Canadian Burnet Occasional in the L. border zone. Salicornia bigelovii Dwarf Glasswort Occasional in highly Torr. saline pannes on high marsh. Salicornia europaea Glasswort or Samphire Common in pannes and L. scattered on high marsh especially where soil salinity is high. Salicornia virinica Perennial or Woody Forms mats in some areas L. Glasswort of high marsh. Scirpus americanus Three-square sedge Wet borders of high marsh. Pers. 44 TABLE 7. (continued) SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME HABITAT Scirpus maritimus Salt Marsh Bulrush Extensive stands along wet L. borders of high marsh. var. Fernaldii (Bickn.) Beetle Scirpus paludosus Bayonet-Grass Sedge of very wet pannes Nels. and rotten spots on high marsh. Smilax rotundifolia Greenbriar Thorny, trailing vine of L. the border zone and on marsh islands'. Solidago sempervirens Seaside Goldenrod Common in the border zone. L. Spartina alterniflora Salt Water Cord Grass Dominant species of Loisel. intertidal marsh. Dwarfed form in low lying poorly drained areas. Spartina patens Salt Meadow Grass Dominant species of high (Ait.) Muhl. marsh. Spartina pectinate Fresh Water Cordgrass Border zones and near Link fresh water. Spergularia canadensis Sand Spurrey Sandy strands along (Pers.) Don edge of marsh. Spergularia marine Spurrey Common on edges of high (L.) Griseb. marsh and rim of creek and ditch banks. Suaeda Sea blite Common along strand line, (Spp.) borders of high and intertidal marsh and around pannes. Triglochin maritime Seaside Arrow Grass Scattered on high marsh L. and forb pannes. Typha angustifolia Narrow-Leaved Cat tail Extensive colonies in L. brackish areas along border of marsh. 45 seem to have a wider distribution and can only help to delineate the major zones; intertidal, high marsh or border zone. The complexity of the tidal marsh ecosystem does not lend itself to simple explanation. New Hampshire tidal marshes are an ecotone between marine and terrestrial systems, and as such are influenced by both. The species present on the marsh are biologically unique. They have adapted to the rigors of life in an environment that changes daily as well as seasonally. The tidal marshes are still developing and still changing. However, the rate and the kind of change is dependent not only on natural processes, but also on human activities which directly affect them. 3,2.2 Salt Marsh Hydrology and Degradatio Many of the coastal marshes in New Hampshire have experienced degradation and loss due to the altering of their hydrology, which can often be attributed directly to human activities. In 1974 there were reported to be 7,500 acres of tidal marsh in New Hampshire (Breeding, et al.). This acreage had dwindled to 6,600 acres by 1982 (Short, 1985). With the rapid development of New Hampshire's coastal communities over the last four years, tidal wetlands have undoubtedly continued to shrink further in size. The two hydrologic conditions that most severely affect saltmarsh viability are restriction of tidal flow, and retention of water on the high marsh surface. It is the flooding and draining of saline waters that create the conditions essential to the characteristic high marsh flora and fauna. Restrictions along the course of the tidal creeks can inhibit ocean water from reaching the upper regions of the high marsh during a tidal cycle. With a restricted tidal flow, soil salinity will 46 eventually be reduced and the water table lowered, resulting in subsidence of peat from shrinkage and decomposition. This, in turn, increases areas of pannes and/or rotten spots and permits encroachment of freshwater or border zone species. The most aggressive of these border zone plants is purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Lythruin is an introduced species from Europe that has moved into freshwater and terrestrial habitats throughout New England. It does not produce the detrital material so essential to the food web of a healthy tidal system, nor does it attract birds or wildlife, due to its low food value. Loose- strife tends to constitute a barrier to wildlife rather than a protective habitat. The invasion of purple loosestrife, and to a lesser extent Typha (cattail) and Phragmites (common reed), indicates a degrading salt marsh system. Phragmites has been described by Roman et al. (1984) as an indicator of a marsh system degraded due to tidal restriction. Phragmites is most often found along the border of the tidal marsh, particularly in areas that have been disturbed by manmade or natural causes (Niering and Warren, 1980; Nixon and Oviatt, 1973; Redfield, 1972). Typha is also a border zone species that can withstand limited exposure to brackish water (Richardson, 1983; Redfield, 1972). Typha, and Phragmites may indicate sources of freshwater coming into the marsh (Nixon, 1982; Nixon and Oviatt, 1973). Prolonged retention of water on the high marsh surface will destroy the high marsh vegetation creating dead pannes and rotten spots. At these sites, the marsh peat begins to rot, compact and subside, creating low areas on the marsh. The low areas act to trap additional waters. As trapped tidal water begins to evaporate, salt concentration increases. These shallow pannes, with high saline conditions, will kill off most high marsh vegetation and eventually will eliminate much of the fauna brought in with the tidal waters. However, these shallow pannes are not totally dead. They support thriving colonies of bluegreen algae 47 and many insects. The deeper pannes, which do not progress toward hyper-saline conditions, will often contain crustaceans and small fish brought in by the higher spring tides. Wildlife and shore birds are attracted to this trapped food source and to the submergent plants, such as Ruppia m8rltima, often found in these deeper pannes (Richardson, 1980). Panne formation indicates an unstable ecosystem. As the pannes increase in size and number, the marsh's health degrades to the point where it becomes inhospitable to birds and animals. Ironically, an area of tidal marsh rich in birds and fish may indicate a system in the process of decline toward a stable, but non-ecologically productive condition (Short, 1985). Mosquito ditches, excavated earlier in this century, have exacerbated the problems associated with trapped waters. The levees, which were formed as the peat was removed and piled up along the margins of the ditches, have created enclosed areas that are flooded on the higher spring tides and then prevented from draining. When residents complain about the health of a salt marsh, mosquitos and odor are among their greatest concerns. Both of these are natural phenomena of a tidal marsh system, but both may be aggravated by a restricted tidal ebb and flow and/or lack of proper drainage of the high marsh. A marsh with restricted drainage, many pannes and rotten spots, and large mono-culture stands of border zone species is likely to be afflicted with mosquito and odor problems. The solution to problems associated with tidal restriction and lack of drainage is an increase in the movement of both fresh and salt water across the marsh surface. However, each impacted tidal system has its own set of conditions contributing to inhibited tidal ebb and flow, so solutions for mitigating these impacts must be site-specific. See Section 5.3 for a discussion of problems in selected New Hampshire salt marshes. 48 3.2.3 Salt Marsh Soils Soils in tidal wetlands are organic peat deposits composed of plant remains in various stages of decomposition, and sand, silt and clay mineral particles. The intertidal marsh soils contain a smaller percentage of organic matter than do the high marsh soils, due to the extent and duration of tidal flooding and the scouring action of ice flows which carry away the aerial plant parts. The high marsh peat, in addition to greater organic matter content, contains finer mineral fractions (silts and clays) which are held in suspension longer as the flood ties cover the marsh. The presence.of sulfidic materials is an important property of tidal wetland soils. These materials accumulate in both organic and mineral soil materials under permanently saturated conditions. When a clod of tidal marsh soil is dug up, the characteristic "rotten egg" smell of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is often quite noticeable. If these soils are drained or excavated and exposed to the air, the sulfides oxidize and form sulfuric acid and the soil will no longer support plant growth. The soils found in New Hampshire saltmarshes, along with their Soil Conservation Service (SCS) identification codes, are briefly described below. 397 TYPIC SULFIHEMISTS, organic materials thicker than 50 inches. This soil occupies the high marsh of the main central part of the coastal marshes, the high marsh bordering the streams feeding into the coastal marshes, and the high marsh bordering the smaller streams flowing into Great and Little Bays. In its natural state, this soil is suited for the growth of halophytes such as Spartina patens and Juncus gerardi. Salt hay is the only suitable agricultural crop. Flooding and salinity preclude use of this soil for tree growth. Restricted internal drainage, flooding, and low bearing strength present 49 severe limitations to its use for community development. It is well suited to wetland wildlife habitat development. 497 TERRIC SULFIHEMISTS over sand, organic materials 16 to 50 inches thick, overlying sandy materials. This soil generally lies at the edges of the high coastal marshes, both the landward margin underlain by sandy-textured tills and the seaward margin underlain by the sand and gravels of the barrier beaches. It also 1 ies in the banks of the large tidal rivers of the coastal marsh. Most of the intertidal marshes are underlain by this soil. The natural vegetation of the intertidal portion of this soil is uniformly Spartina alterniflora. The high marsh vegetation comprises a greater variety of salt-tolerant herbaceous plants, the dominant species being Spartina patens, Distichlis spicata and Juncus gerardi. Only the high marsh areas afford any potential for farming and that is limited to production of salt hay. This soil does not support tree growth. It has severe limitations to use for community and recreational development. It is best suited to wetland wildlife habitat development. 597 TERRIC SULFIHEMISTS over silt, organic materials 16 yo 50 inches thick overlying silty materials. This soil occurs at the headwaters of small tidal streams and in small coves on the landward side of the coastal marshes. It also occupies high marsh areas along the upper reaches of streams feeding into the Great Bay complex, shallow coves and narrow margins of the bay, and the intertidal marshes contiguous to deep high marsh soils of the bay. 50 The dominant natural vegetation is Spartina alternlflor8 on the intertidal marsh, and Spartina patens, Distichlis spicata and Juncus gerardi, on the high marsh. The salinity and periodic flooding preclude tree growth and the growth of herbaceous plants other than those capable of standing salt concentrations in excess of 10 ppt. The properties of this soil make it unfavorable for community and recreational development uses. It is not suitable for farming. It is well adapted for use as wetland wildlife habitat development. 697 LITHIC SULFIHEMISTS, organic materials 16 to 50 inches thick overlying bedrock This soil occupies areas characterized by numerous rock outcroppings. It occurs in New Castle, in the eastern part of the town of Rye and in one small area in the town of Seabrook. In its natural condition, the soil is covered with herbaceous, salt-tolerant plants typical of the high marsh. The dominant species are Spartina patens and Juncus gerardi. Where installed, open drainage ditches have not materially improved the soil's potential for agricultural production. Salinity and flooding preclude the growth of forest trees. All areas of this soil are in natural vegetation. Its best use is for wetland wildlife habitat development. 797 TYPIC SULFAQUENTS, organic materials less than 16 inches thick overlying sandy materials. This soil of the high marsh lies at the extreme seaward margin of the coastal marshes on the gently shelving sands of the barrier beach. It is also in small areas on the western side of Great Bay and several streams flowing into it. 51 The natural vegetation includes salt-tolerant herbaceous plants, mainly Spartina patens, Juncus gerardi and Salicornia virginica. Periodic flooding and high salinity inhibit the growth of trees. Salinity and tidal flooding limit any farming operations except the harvesting of salt hay. If flooding is controlled, the thin surface organic horizons and the underlying sands do not present the problems to filling, presented by other salt marsh soils. In fact, perhaps one-third of the original extent of this soil has been filled and developed. In its natural condition, however, its best use is for wetland wildlife habitat development. 997 SULFIHEMISTS, surface soils with low salt, organic materials thicker than 50 inches, or 16 to 50 inches thick overlying sandy or silty materials. This soil commonly occurs in small areas at the headwaters of streams feeding into the marshes and along the banks of the larger tidal river flowing into the Great Bay complex. Spartina alterniflora is the dominant vegetation of the intertidal portions. On the high marsh portion, in addition to Spartina patens, are many plant species unable to withstand the higher salt concentrations of other tidal marsh soils, Typical plants are Spartina pectinata (freshwater cordgrass), and Typha spp., the cattails. The soil has little or no value for farming and will not support forest tree growth. It is well suited to wetland wildlife habitat development. 52 3.2.4 Literature Bloom, A.L. 1978. Geomorphology: A Systematic Analysis of Late Cenozoic Landform. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Breeding, C.H.J., F.D. Richardson and S.A.L. Pilgrim. 1974 Soil survey of New Hampshire tidal marshes. N.H. Agri. Exp. Station Resource Report No. 40. Johnson, D.W. 1925. The New England-Acadian Shoreline, Hafner Publishing Company, New York, NY. Keene, H.W. 1970. Salt marsh evolution and postglacial submergence in NH. University of New Hampshire, M.Sc. Thesis. Mudge, B.F. 1862. The salt marsh formations of Lynn. in Proc. Essex Insti. (II). Niering, W.A. and R.S. Warren. 1980. Vegetation patterns and processes in New England salt marshes. Bio Sci. 30: 301-309. Nixon, S.W. 1982 The ecology of New England high salt marshes: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. FWS/OBS 81/55. Nixon, S.W. and C.A. Oviatt. 1973. Ecology of a New England salt marsh. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 463-498. Redfield, A.C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 201-237. 53 Richardson, F.D. 1980. Ecology of Ruppia maritime L. in New Hampshire (USA) tidal marshes. Rhodora 82: 403-439. 1983. Variation, Adaptation and Reproductive Biology in Ruppia maritime L. Populations. New Hampshire Coastal and Estuarine Tidal Marshes. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D. Thesis, Durham, NH. 1982. Identification, Documentation and Mapping of Prime Tidal Wetlands in the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire. Durham, NH. Roman, C.T., W.A. Niering and R.S. Warren 1984. Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction. Env. Mgmt. 8(2): 141-150. Short, F.T. 1985. North Hampton Salt Marsh Study:. Draft Report submitted to New Hampshire's Coastal Zone Program. Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH. Simpson, M. 1986. Restoration of Parsons Creek Marsh, Rye, NH, Antioch New England, M. Sc. Thesis. 54 3.3 SAND DUNE COMMUNITIES The public benefits from dune areas fall into two categories: they provide buffer zones which protect public and private interests from blowing sand, erosion and flooding associated with coastal storms, and they provide critical habitat for a plant community as unique as that of the salt marshes. Twelve dune areas were evaluated as part of this project, marked with codes beginning with "DU" on the wetlands maps. 3.1.1 Dune Ecology and Development Dunes are common on the Atlantic coastal plain from Cape Cod southward, but very few exist north of Plum Island, MA. In New Hampshire, sand dune plants are at the northern limit of their ranges (Table 8). The most common indicator species is beach (or dune) grass (Ammophila breviligulata), able to grow several inches a day and tolerate the extreme dune conditions. Dunes are formed from fine sand carried along the coast by waves and long shore currents. As the wave patterns change and the daily tide rises and falls, a ridge of sand is deposited just above the waters' highest reach. This ridge dries out at low tide and and is subject to wind erosion. Much of the sand is blown back into the ocean but some moves inland and is dropped by the wind in quieter areas. Onshore breezes erode the tidal ridge, carry the fine sea sand inland across a level expanse of beach and deposit it at the first major wind break, usually at the bases of pioneer dune plants such as beach grass, sea rocket (Cakile edentula), or beach pea (Lathyrus japonica). These plants can tolerate the salt in the sea sand, and by stopping the blowing sand they form the first ridge of dunes closest to the beach, called the foredunes. Each tidal cycle brings more sand along the coast to the beach top and each onshore breeze adds sand to the bases of the foredune plants, gradually building the dunes to a height which the waves alone do not reach. 55 Table 8. Indicator Plant Species for Sand Dunes GENUS SPECIES COMMON NAME TYPE ----- ------- ------ ---- ---- Pinus rigida Pitch pine Tree Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass Herb Aristida tuberculosa Seabeach needle grass Herb Cenchrus longispinus Northern sandbur Herb Cenchrus incertus Gulf coast sandbur Herb Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry Shrub Myrica cerifera Waxmyrtle Shrub Quercus prinoides Dwarf chinkapin oak Shrub Quercus ilicifolia Bear (scrub) oak Shrub Atriplex patula Halberd-leaved orach Herb Suaeda maritima Seaside blight Herb Suaeda richii Sea-blite Herb Suaeda linearis Sea-blite Herb Salsola kali Common saltwort Herb Spergularia marina Sand-spurrey Herb Arenaria lateriflora Grove sandwort Herb Arenaria peploides Seabeach sandwort Herb Cakile edentula Searocket Herb Prunus maritima Beach plum Shrub Prunus pumila Sand cherry Shrub Prunus susquehanae Sand cherry Shrub Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Shrub Empetrum nigrum Black crowberry Shrub Corema conradii Broom crowberry Shrub Hudsonia ericoides Golden heather Shrub Hudsonia tomentosa Poverty-grass Shrub Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Bearberry Shrub Limonium carolinianum Sea lavender Herb Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod Herb Baccharis halimifolia Groundsel-tree Shrub Iva frutescens Marsh elder Both Artemisia caudata Wormwood Herb Artemisia stelleriana Dusty miller Herb 56 Successive dune ridges are built in this manner and maintained by the dune plants until eroded by an extreme coastal storm where erosion by large waves removes the entire beach and foredune areas. Back dunes (old foredunes now protected by new rows of foredunes) are protected from salt by their distance from the ocean. A new plant community develops, where less salt-tolerant plants such as beach plum (Prunus marititna) and golden heather (ffudsonla ericoldes) invade the beach grass. The water table in sandy areas is a critical factor in determining what plant species take hold of these back dunes. Precipi- tation and runoff percolate down through the sand and come to rest on the denser layer of salt water. Some mixing occurs at the boundary, but less than one might assume. With additional rain, the boundary is depressed below sea level and the fresh water forms a floating layer, thin near the salt water edge and thick in the middle of the dunes, called a lens (for its shape). Plants requiring fresh water can tap this lens, provided there is sufficient recharge water to prevent the salt water from entering their root systems during the driest part of each summer. When one considers the effects of the daily rise and fall of the tides, with the fresh water rising and falling as it floats on top of the salt, one can imagine how complex the interactions become. 3.3.2 Dune Uses and Degradation Dune stability depends most directly on sand mobility, which in turn depends on plants and other natural wind breaks. Unfortunately, the plants most able to colonize dunes are also very fragile due to their delicate underground roots systems, easily damaged by foot or vehicular traffic. Some plants, like the golden heather, are destroyed for decades by the passage of a single vehicle. 57 Once sandy areas are disturbed by traffic, progressive degeneration ensues, with blowing sand being removed by any high wind, exposing the roots of the remaining plants, causing them to fail, and so forth. Sand is removed rapidly from flat open areas, being deposited around the nearest downwind wind breaks. Nearby standing vegetation is drenched with this sand, forming ridges around the flat depleted area. The result is a bowl-shaped area called a "blow-out". Unless checked by the addition of windbreaks in the center of the bowl, the sand will be removed to a great depth, often reaching the water table, where the wind encounters less erodible sand and the erosion "bottoms out". The keys to managing sandy areas are listed below; more information is available in the Management Plan for Seabrook Dunes (NAI, 1985, Office of State Planning). The following summary may be useful: 1. Avoid foot and vehicular traffic to the greatest extent possible. Place barricades and signs. Restrict all human use. 2. Place windbreaks (snow fences, brush staked in place) in unvegetated areas to stop the loss of sand. 3. Establish new vegetation; beach grass can be purchased and easily planted. Fertilize it well initially. Follow up with woody species within the next year. Hand-planting of sprigs (culms) should begin early in May in areas protected from all traffic and from wind. This species has been successfully used to stabilize moving sand since approximately 1895, when the Town of Provincetown, Massachusetts, used it to remedy a major sand dune movement. Once rooted it grows rapidly and reduces the sand movement to a moderate level wherever it flourishes. It is routinely used at Parker River Refuge and Salisbury Beach Reserve to replace vegetation following vehicle damage, and is planted one culm every 12' feet, or about one culm per 0.45 square feet. It is available from: Mr. Edwin Springer, Springer Environmental Services, Inc. 245 Keene Road, Acushnet, MA 02743, (617) 763-2152 For additional information on sand management or planting contact: Mr. Peter Carlson, Sr. Forest & Parks Supervisor, Salisbury Beach State Reservation, P. 0. Box 303, Salisbury, MA 01950, (617) 462-4481 58 3.3.3 Literature A. N. Strahler 1966. A Geologist's view of Cape Co - Natural History Press, Garden City, NY. 115 pp. W. Bascom Waves and Beaches - Science Study Series. Anchor Books, Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, NY. J. D. Fogg 1983. Recollections of a salt marsh farmer. Publ. by the Historical Society of Seabrook, NH D. A. Dunlop, G. E. Crow, and T. J. Bertrand 1983. Coastal Endangere Plant Inventory, a report on the Seabrook Dunes, its vegetatio and flora. C.Z.M.A. funded, Unpublished report, 35 pp. L. C. Petry & M. G. Norman 1968. A beachcomber's botan . The Chatham Conservation Foundation, Inc. Chatham, MA 02633. 158 pp. M. L. Fernald 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th edition. Corrected printing 1970. D. Van Nostrand Co., NY. 1632 pp. G., W. D. Symonds and A. W. Merwin 1963. The shrub identification book. Wm. Morrow & Co., NY. 379 pp + photographs G. W. D. Symonds and S. V. Chelminski 1958. The tree identification book. Wm. Morrow & Co., NY. 272 pp + photographs 59 R. T. Peterson and M. McKenny 1968 A field guide to wildflowers of northeastern and northcentral North America. The Peterson Field Guide Series #17. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA. J. D. Lazell, Jr. and M.C. Michener, 1976. This Broken Archipelago. Reptiles and Amphibians of Cape Co . Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Company, New York, NY. 160 pp. + 105 photographs. 4.0 APPENDIX: FRESHWATER WETLANDS, DETAILED RESULTS 4.1 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS Two pages present the evaluation results for each wetland. The left page consists of copies of the two data sheets ("EVAL" and "MAPR") output by the computer in the exact forms from which the results were calculated. The right page contains the most important summaries, as described below. It is divided into the top: ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY, and the bottom: RESULTS OF MODEL COMPUTATIONS. Explanation of ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY PLANT SPECIES LIST: Abundance - a relative measure of areal dominance estimated visually in the field for each species; (summed to the variable TABUN on the datasheet EVAL) Wetl Freq - the frequency with which the plant species occurs in wetlands; based on National Wetlands Inventory plant list; blank indicates no data, usually because the plant species is not adequately identified. Type - Plant type: T=tree, S=shrub; H=herb; B=both S and H; A=all types Note: trees may be T if mature or S if less than 5 meters (15 ft) high, Food Value - summary of wildlife food value, range: low to hi 0-4 COMMUNITY SUMMARY PARAMETERS: WSI - Wetland Site Index, an overall summation of Wetl Freq for all the species listed, weighted by abundance. WFV - Wildlife Food Value, a summation of food values for the species listed, weighted by abundance, normalized to range: 0 to 1. BOG - Fraction of total abundance contributed by bog indicator species. SALT - Fraction of total abundance contributed by salt marsh species. DUNE - Fraction of total abundance contributed by sand dune species. SUBCLASS REPRESENTATIONS: SHRUB - Fraction of total abundance contributed by shrubs described as Aquatic, Sapling, Bushy and Compact MARSH - Fraction of total abundance contributed by herbs described as Robust, Broad-leafed, Narrow-leafed, and Floating-leafed TYPE: The wetland type is set by the field observer's choice of Dominant Wetland Class (DWC on the EVAL datasheet, although more than one class may be present in each wetland) as follows: 0 Brookside 6 Shrub swamp 1 Open water 7 Wooded swamp 2 Deep fresh marsh 8 Bog 3 Shallow fresh marsh 9 Salt marsh 4 Annual floodplain 10 Dune 5 Wet meadow SUBTYPES: All plant species found in significant amounts (greater than 2% total abundance) are taken to indicate the presence of marsh and shrub swamp subtypes. Their presence causes the appropriate letter to appear in this space. Some stand for community indicator species (B,D and S), the others stand for the subtypes listed below. A=Aquatic Sh. D=Dune N=Narrow-leaf H. S=Saltmarsh W=Wide-leaf B=Bog F=Float-leaf H. P=saPling Sh. U=bUshy Sh. (broad) C=Compact Sh. M=Moss R=Robust H. V=Vine Explanation of RESULTS OF MODEL COMPUTATIONS Each model has been run on 238 wetlands in New Hampshire. The results were sorted by score in order of rank, from the lowest to the highest. The lowest ten perc .ent of the wetland scores are placed in the first decile, the next ten percent higher are placed in the second decile, and so on until all ten deciles are specified. This results table shows which decile each wetland falls in, ranked against the other wetlands in this study. The number of stars indicates,the number of deciles. The table is organized to show the model number, then the model abbreviation, then the raw score, then the ranking decile. A colon is placed after the first five deciles to show the placement of the median value (the lowest five deciles or 50% of the wetlands). Below the table is the average decile for all ten models, as well as an indication of whether the wetland fit the two criteria for prime wetland candidate (See Section 2.5). I 1 4.2 RESULTS TABLES BY TOWN I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO02 PLACE: (Photo 3-6) S of Depot Ave, HF FL DATe 04/16/86 GS&ABUN 20: VIBREC10 Veg DENsity (HML) L GS&ABUN I ACERUB15 GS&ABUN 21: CORAMO 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 POPTRE 8 GS&ABUN 22: sALIX 3 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETPOP 2 GS&ABUN 23: pOPTRE 5 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PINSTR 4 GS&ABUN 24: SPILAT 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: L GS&ABUN 5' ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 25: MYRPEN 1 GS&ABUN 6 PRUSER 1 GS&ABUN 26: RIBES 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS. GS&ABUN 7 CAROVA 1 GS&ABUN 27: ROSPAL 2 WSI: 0.724 GS&ABUN 8' BETPAP 1 GS&ABUN 28: RHURAD30 WFV: 0.362 GS&ABUN 9 RHUTYP 1 GS&ABUN 29: ONOSEN18 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: aCERUB 3 GS&ABUN 30: SOLIDA 2 NO. of species-' 30 GS&ABUN 11: ALNRUG35 INVestigator TLP Prime GS&ABUN 12: pINSTR 3 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.051 GS&ABUN 13: ILEVER16 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 177 GS&ABUN 14: RHAFRA 6 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: jUNVIR 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.192 GS&ABUN 16: uLMAME 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.695 GS&ABUN 17: VITIS 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.113 GS&ABUN 18: ROSMUL 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: bETPOP 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY PUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO02 OUTIet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF PRYO' Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 26 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 538 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 397 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):O PERmeabil (LMH):H INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW` Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 3-6) S of Depot Ave, HF HAO02 Field Date: 04/16/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 T 3 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 8 0.00 T 2 Betula populifolia Grey birch 2 0.50 T 2 Pinus strobus White pine 4 0.18 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T I Prunus serotina Black cherry 1 0.18 T 3 Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 1 0.18 T 2 Betula papyrifera Paper birch 1 0.18 T 2 Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac 1 0.00 T 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 3 0.50 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 35 1.00 S 1 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 S 3 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 16 1.00 S 1 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 6 0.50 S 0 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 S 1 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Vitis sp. Grapevine 1 S 3 Rosa multiflora Multiflora rose 2 0.00 S 1 Betula populifolia Grey birch 1 0.50 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 10 0.82 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 3 0.82 S I Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 5 0.00 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 1 0.50 S 0 Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 1 0.50 S 2 Ribes sp. Gooseberry 1 S I Rosa palustris Marsh rose 2 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 30 0.82 S 2 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 18 1.00 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 WSI: 0.723 WFV: 0.361 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.005 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.09 BUSHY: 0.39 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.10 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:PUVIA' WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U1 T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 31.7 6 WQual 38.2 2 Hydro 50.0 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 47.1 8 Recr 30.1 4 Flood 58.8 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 12.4 10 Educ 25.3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.10 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO03 PLACE: (Photo 3-6) Brimers Ln, HF FL DATe 06/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: ASTER 1 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB30 GS&ABUN 21: IMPCAP 2 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 QUERUB 1 GS&ABUN 22: ARANUD 2 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETLUT I GS&ABUN 23: OSMREG 3 Lo, Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 VACCOR15 GS&ABUN 24: MAICAN 7 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CLEALN10 GS&ABUN 25: ONOSEN10 GS&ABUN 6 ILEVER 8 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 RHURAD 7 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.719 GS&ABUN 8 bETPOP 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.343 GS&ABUN 9 pRUSER 1 GS&ABUN 29: Pere. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ALNRUG10 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species; 25 GS&ABUN 11: ROSPAL 8 INVestigator HCS Prime : GS&ABUN 12: VIBREC 7 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.075 GS&ABUN 13: VITIS 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW,): Tot ABUN: 134 GS&ABUN 14: OSMCIN 3 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: IRIVER 1 SubTYpe Richn .(ABCDE): D Trees : 0.239 GS&ABUN 16: THAPOL 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.515 GS&ABUN 17: ATHFIL 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.246 GS&ABUN 18: SOLIDA 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: TRIBOR 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY RUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO03 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P'% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 397 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 38 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 40 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL aces (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y I'N'Letl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rve HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF H'ampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 3-6) Brimers Ln, HF HAO03 Field Date: 06/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 30 0.50 T 3 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 1 0.18 T 4 Betula lutea. Yellow birch 1 0.50 T 2 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 15 0.82 S '2 Clethra alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 10 0.82 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 8 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison iv@ 7 0.82 S 2 Betula, populifolia Grey birch 1 0.50 S 2 Prunus serotina Black cherry 1 0.18 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 10 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 8 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 7 0.82 S 1 Vitis sp. Grapevine 2 S 3 Osmunda. cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 3 0.82 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 1 1.00 H 0 Thalictrum polygamum Tall meadow-rue 1 0.00 H 0 Athyrium filix-femina, Lady fern 1 0.50 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 1 H 0 Trientalis borealis Starflower 1 0.50 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 1 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 2 0.82 H 0 Aralia, nudicaulis Wild sarsaparilla 2 0.00 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 3 1.00 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 7 0.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 10 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.718 WFV: 0.343 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.43 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.12 NARROW: 0.00 FTOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:RUVW WATERSHED: Hampton Palls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score .1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ -------------- I---------------- 1 Biol 32.5 6 WQual 46.0 2 Hydro 51.3 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 30.1 8 Recr 32.8 4 Flood 61.7 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 33.3 ------------------------------ --------------------------- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.30 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO04 PLACE: (Photo 3-6) Dodge Ponds ', between Rtl & Rt84., HF FL DATe 05/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: CAREX 3 Veg DENsity (HML) H GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB50 GS&ABUN 21: JUNEFF 2 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 5 GS&ABUN 22: SOLIDA 2 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 2 GS&ABUN 23: IRIVER 3 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 sALIX 1 GS&ABUN 24: IMPCAP 7 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 VIBCAS10 GS&ABUN 25: PANTRI 2 GS&ABUN 6 CORSTO 2 GS&ABUN 26: MAICAN 4 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 pINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 27: DRYNOV 1 WSI: 0.716 GS&ABUN 8 ALNRUG 4 GS&ABUN 28: ARISAE 2 WFV: 0.363 GS&ABUN 9 vIBLEN 7 GS&ABUN 29: ONOSEN30 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: pRUSER 3 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 29 GS&ABUN 11: RHAFRA 2 INVestigator HCS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ILEVER20 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.078 GS&ABUN 13: RHURAD30 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 232 GS&ABUN 14: VIBREC25 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: RIBES 2 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.246 GS&ABUN 16: CORAMO 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.478 GS&ABUN 17: LYTSAL 3 Surr. HABitat (123) 3 Herbs 0.276 GS&ABUN 18: ASTER 3 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: TYPLAT 2 Percent Open W (LMHV): M SBTY NPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO04 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P110 Bord OW (NLMH) :H Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) :D Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 395 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 299 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :H wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hav Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rve HA Hampton NH North Hampton HP Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 3-6) Dodge Ponds, between Rtl & Rt84, HF 0 HAO04 Field Date: 05/28 /86 Report D ate: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 50 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 5 0.18 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.82 T 1 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 S Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 10 0.82 S 1 Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 4 1.00 S 1 Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 7 0.00 S 1 Prunus serotina Black cherry 3 0.18 S 3 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 2 0.50 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 20 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 30 0.82 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 25 0.82 S 1 Ribes sp. Gooseberry 2 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 3 1.00 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 3 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 3 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 2 1.00 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 3 1.00 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 7 0.82 H 0 Panax trifolium Dwarf ginseng 2 0.00 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 4 0.00 H 0 Dryopteris noveboracensis New yo rk fern 1 0.00 H 0 Arisaema sp. Jack-in-the-pulpit 2 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.716 WFV: 0.363 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.06 BUSHY: 0.28 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.06 BROADL: 0.14 NARROW: 0.02 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NPRUVW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 56.5 6 WQual 54.9 2 Hydro 75.0 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 37.7 8 Recr 45.2 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 59.4 5 ShoLi 65.5 10 Educ 71.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 7.80 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO05 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Dodge Ponds, E of 195, HF FL DATe 06/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsitv (HIML) L GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB40 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 8 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 VACCOR12 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 VIBREC 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: L GS&ABUN 5 CLEALN 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 CARSTR 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ONOSEN 5 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.607 GS&ABUN 8 OSMCIN15 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.500 GS&ABUN 9 OSMREG I GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: DRYNOV 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:' 10 GS&ABUN 11: INVestigator MCM Prime P GS&ABUN 12: Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 1 Aesthetic: 0.000 GS&ABUN 13: SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 86 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.558 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.163 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.279 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): H SBTY UW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO05 OUTlet2 (APE) letter TOWN codes*:SE P%' Bord OW (NLMH) :H Topo CONfig (CSVH) :V FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 395 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 538 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 140 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :L or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):2 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location.: (Photo 4-6) Dodge Ponds, E of 195., HF HAO05 Field Date: 06/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 40 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 8 0.18 T 3 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 12 0.82 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 1 0.82 S 1 Clethra alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 1 0.82 S 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 1 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 5 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 15 0.82 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Dryopteris noveboracensis New york fern 2 0.00 H 0 WSI: 0.607 WFV: 0.500 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.16 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.26 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:UW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Open Freshwater Wetland R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 37.9 6 WQual 25.4 :-,r 2 Hydro 47.3 7 Econ 13.0 3 GrWat 43.3 8 Recr 52.0 4 Flood 24.5 9 Aest 69.5 5 ShoLi 10.3 10 Educ 30.1 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.10 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO06 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) W of Rtl, S of Rt88, HF FL DATe 03/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HPfL) L GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB20 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 CEPOCC70 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ROSPAL 3 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: L GS&ABUN 5 ILEVER 3 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 PYRMEL I GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 pINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.874 GS&ABUN 8 VACCOR 2 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.189 GS&ABUN 9 ONOSEN 4 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: L GS&ABUN 10: GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 9 GS&ABUN 11: INVestigator ASG Prime P GS&ABUN 12: Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.028 GS&ABUN 13: SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 106 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.208 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.755 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.038 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LPfHV): L SBTY AUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO06 OUTIet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes--'r:HF P'10 Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) :S Dom SOil type (int) 197 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 538 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACC'eSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :M Other Surr. Soil2 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):6 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NE North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) W of Rtl, S of Rt88, HF HAO06 Field Date: 03/28/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 20 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T 3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 70 1.00 S 0 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 3 1.00 S I', Ilex verticillata Winterberry 3 1.00 S 1 Pyrus melanocarpa Black chokeberry 1 0.50 S 1 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 4 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.874 WFV: 0.188 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.66 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.07 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.03 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:AUW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 45.7 6 WQual 53.9 2 Hydro 22.3 7 Econ 47.8 3 GrWat 39.6 8 Recr 28.7 4 Flood 59.8 9 Aest 50.7 5 ShoLi 9.,31 10 Educ 46.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.60 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO07 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Dodge Ponds, W of 195,HF FL DATe 06/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) L GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB20 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 TILAME 1 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 2 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 FRAAME 2 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CORAMO 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 sALIX 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ILEVER 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.680 GS&ABUN 8 VACCOR 3 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.417 GS&ABUN 9 RHAFRA 1 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: CLEALN 3 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 17 GS&ABUN 11: OSMCIN 3 INVestigator MCM Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: OSMREG 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 1 Aesthetic: 0.029 GS&ABUN 13: CARSTR 3 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW Tot ABUN: 51 GS&ABUN 14: DRYSPI 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) 3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: ONOSEN 5 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.490 GS&ABUN 16: THAPOL 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.196 GS&ABUN 17: IRIS 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.314 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): B Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: -Percent Open W (LMHV): H SBTY NUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO07 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes--'r:SE P'/. Bord OW (NLMH) :H Topo CONfig (CSVH) :V FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 395 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 140 POP In density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 510 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):3 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. lnc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) Dodge Ponds, W of 195, HF HAO07 Field Date: 06/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 20 0.50 T 3 Tilia americana Basswood 1 0.18 T 1 Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.82 T 1 Fraxinus americana White ash 2 0.50 T 'i Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 S I Ilex verticillata Winterberry 1 1.00 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 3 0.82 S 2 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 1 0.50 S 0 Clethra alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 3 0.82 S 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 3 0.82 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 3 1.00 H 3 Dryopteris spinulosa Spinulose shieldfern 2 0.82 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 5 1.00 H 0 Thalictrum polygamum Tall meadow-rue 1 0.00 H 0 Iris sp. Iris 1 H 0 WSI: 0.679 WFV: 0.416 BOG: o.obo SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.01 BROADL: 0.21 NARROW: 0.05 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES: NUW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Open Freshwater Wetland R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benef it Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 51.9 6 WQual 31.3 2 Hydro 59.2 7 Econ 30.4 3 GrWat 49.0 8 Recr 67.1 4 Flood 34.3 9 Aest 69.5 5 ShoLi 10.3 10 Educ 41.2 ... ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE'DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.10 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO08 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Cock Hill Rd, near jct with Rt88, HF FL DATe 03/27/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB65 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 BETLEN10 GS&ABUN 02: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 UL111AME10 GS&ABUN -93: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ILEVER25 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 VIBREC20 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.697 GS&AB UN8 SPILAT 3 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.403 GS&ABUN 9 ROSPAL 4 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: RHAFRA12 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species,: 1 11 GS&ABUN 11: ONOSEN18 INVestigator ASG Prime : GS&ABUN 12: Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.078 GS&ABUN 13: SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 185 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.476 -GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.427 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.097 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpd-rs.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY UW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO08 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 546 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 47 POP'n density (LMH) :M Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):T PERmeabil (LMH):H INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) Cock Hill Rd, near jct with Rt88, HF HAO08 Field Date: 03/27/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 65 0.50 T 3 Betula lenta Sweet birch 10 0.18 T 2 .Ulmus,americana American elm 10 0.82 T 1 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 T Ilex verticillata Winterberry 25 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 20 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 3 0.50 S 0 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 4 1.00 S 1 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 12 0.50 S 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 18 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.696 WFV: 0.402 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.41 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.09 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:UW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 31.0 6 WQual 48.0 2 Hydro 55.2 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 39.6 8 Recr 32.8 4 Flood 61.7 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 33.3 ------- ------ -- --- ------- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.80 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO09 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) S of Rt88., between 195 & Rtl, HF FL DATe 03/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB18 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 BETPOP 3 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 CEPOCC 3 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ALNRUG10 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 VACCOR 3 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 CLEALN 3 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 pINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.707 GS&ABUN 8 aCERUB15 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.435 GS&ABUN 9 SPITOM 5 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VACMAC 8 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 12 GS&ABUN 11: SPHAGN10 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: PHRCOM 3 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.048 GS&ABUN 13: SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 84 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.250 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.595 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.155 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.214 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY ACMPRU Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO09 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P1,0 Bord OW (NLM11) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :C FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) :S Dom SOil type (int) 95 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 298 Lake or Combin. :N Dom Surround Soil 510 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 38 POP'n density (LMH) :M Other Surr. Soi12 40 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):6 RIPArian conn (YN) :N INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):O PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):H INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :R INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :H OUTLetl (APE) :A NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) S of Rt88, between 195 & Rtl, HF HAO09 Field Date: 03/28/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Valu,e Acer rubrum Red maple 18 0.50 T 3 Betula populifolia. Grey birch 3 0.50 T 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 3 1.00 S 0 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 10 1.00 S Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 3 0.82 S 2 Clethra alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 3 0.82 S 0 Pinus strobus 'White pine 3 0.18 S 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 S 3 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 5 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium macrocarpon Large cranberry 8 1.00 S 2 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 10 1.00 H 0 Phragmites communis Reed 3 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.707 WFV: 0.434 BOG: 0.214 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.03 SAPLINGS: 0.21 BUSHY: 0.19 COMPACT: 0.15 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.03 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:ACMPRU WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F 11 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 53.4 6 WQual 51.9 2 Hydro 7.89 7 Econ 39.1 3 GrWat 64.1 8 Recr 20.5 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 36.2 5 ShoLi 14.4 10 Educ 53.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO10 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) N of Rt84, W of 195,HF FL DATe 06/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: ONOSEN12 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB55 GS&ABUN 21: EQUARV 3 wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR20 GS&ABUN 22: SOLIDA 2 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 2 GS&ABUN 23: IRIPRI 1 Lo Vernal pool): H GS&ABUN 4 POPTRE 1 GS&ABUN 24: GERMAC 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 JUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 25: OSMREG 1 GS&ABUN 6 uLMAME 1 GS&ABUN 26: MAICAN 3 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 VIBCAS 1 GS&ABUN 27: ARANUD 1 WSI: 0.543 GS&ABUN 8 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 28: TRIBOR 1 WFV: 0.489 GS&ABUN 9 sALIX 1 GS&ABUN 29: COPGRO 2 Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VACCOR 1 GS&ABUN 30: DRYSPI 2 NO. of species; 30 GS&ABUN 11: SPILAT 2 INVestigator : MCM Prime : GS&ABUN 12: RHAFRA 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.015 GS&ABUN 13: CLEALN 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW Tot ABUN: 134 GS&ABUN 14: VIBREC 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) 1 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: ALNRUG 3 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.590 GS&ABUN 16: ILEVER 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.172 GS&ABUN 17: RHURAD 3 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.239 GS&ABUN 18: DRYTHE 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: OSMCIN 2 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY NPUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO10 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:SE P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :C FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 32 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 538 Lake or Combin. :N Dom Surround Soil 140 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :I Other Surr. Soi"11 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):6 RIPArian conn (YN) :N INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :R INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :A NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) N of Rt84, W of 195., HF HAO10 Field Date: 06/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 55 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 20 0.18 T 3 -U-lmu,s- americana American elm 2 0.82 T .1 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 1 -0-00 T Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T 1 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 1 0.82 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 2 0.50 S 0 Clethra'alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 1 0.82 S 0 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 2 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 3 1.00 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 1 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 3 0.82 S 2 Dryopteris thelypteris Marsh fern 1 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 2 0.82 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 12 1.00 H 0 Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 3 0.50 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Iris prismatica Slender blue flag 1 1.00 H 0 Geranium maculatum Wild cranesbill 1 0.18 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 3 0.00 H 0 Aralia nudicaulis Wild sarsaparilla 1 0.00 H 0 Trientalis borealis Starflower 1 0.50 H 0 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 2 0.82 H 0 Dryopteris spinulosa Spinulose shieldfern 2 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.543 WFV: 0.488 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.05 BUSHY: 0.08 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.14 NARROW: 0.02 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NPUVW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 31.0 6 WQual 46.0 2 Hydro 5.26 7 Econ 60.8 3 GrWat 54.7 8 Recr 24.6 4 Flood 66.6 9 Aest 26.0 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 20.6 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.20 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HAO11 PLACE: (Photo 4-4) Hampton Falls River S of Rt84, W of 195, HF SE FL DATe 04/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: fRAAME 1 Veg DENsity (HML) : M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB30 GS&ABUN 21: LYOLIG 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 QUEBIC 1 GS&ABUN 22: RUBHIS 1 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTRI4 GS&ABUN 23: CARSTR20 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 TSUCAN 5 GS&ABUN 24: COPGRO 4 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 NYSSYL 1 GS&ABUN 25: ONOSEN 5 GS&ABUN 6 JUNVIR I GS&ABUN 26: SPHAGN 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 aCERUB22 GS&ABUN 27: LYTSAL 1 WSI: 0.640 GS&ABUN 8 pINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 28: CAREXA 1 WFV: 0.578 GS&ABUN 9 ILEVER 2 GS&ABUN 29: TYPLAT 1 Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VIBREC 4 GS&ABUN 30: ASTER 1 NO. of species:' 30 GS&ABUN 11: VACCOR10 INVestigator MCM Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: CORAMO 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.021 GS&ABUN 13: SALDIS 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 141 GS&ABUN 14: SPILAT 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: ALNRUG 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.369 GS&ABUN 16: ROSPAL 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.379 GS&ABUN 17:. VACANG 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.252 GS&ABUN 18: tSUCAN 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.014 GS&ABUN 19: RHURAD 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HAO11 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HA HY P'/*' Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo C ONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :H DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 395 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 134 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 538 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 533 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 32 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam, Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :11 or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :P SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) :P SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) :P HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-4) Hampton Falls River, S of Rt84, W of 195,HF SE HAO11 Field Date: 04/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 30 0.50 T 3 Quercus bicolor Swamp white oak 1 1.00 T 4 ,@Pinus,.strobus White pine 14 0.18 T 3 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 5 0.50 T '11 Nyssa sylvatica Black gum, tupelo 1 0.82 T 1 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 22 0.50 S 3 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 S 3 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 2 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 4 0.82 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 10 0.82 S 2 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Salix discolor Pussy willow 1 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 1 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S 1 Vaccinium angustifolium Late sweet blueberry 1 0.50 S 2 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 1 0.82 S 2 Fraxinus americana. White ash 1 0.50 S 1 Lyonia ligustrina Maleberry 1 1.00 S 0 Rubus hispidus Trailing bramble 1 0.50 B 3 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 20 1.00 H 3 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 4 0.82 H, 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 5 1.00 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 2 1.00 H 0 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 1 1.00 H 0 Carex sp.(A) A Sedge 1 1.00 H 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 1 1.00 H 1 Aster sp. Asters I H 0 WSI: 0.640 WFV: 0.578 BOG: 0.014 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.19 BUSHY: 0.14 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.01 BROADL: 0.06 NARROW: 0.14 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPUW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 63.5 6 WQual 70.5 2 Hydro 76.3 7 Econ 91.3 3 GrWat 66.0 8 Recr 60.2 4 Flood 69.6 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 61.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 8.80 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: BA028 PLACE: (Photo 5-4) Winkley Brook, HF FL DATe 06/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: TYPLAT 3 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB40 GS&ABUN 21: SYMFOE 2 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME 3 GS&ABUN 22: ATHFIL 3 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 JUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 23: GALASP 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PINSTR 6 GS&ABUN 24: EQUSYL 2 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 pOPGRA 2 GS&ABUN 25: OSMREG 2 GS&ABUN 6 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 26: CAREX 15 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 CORAMO 8 GS&ABUN 27: SOLIDA 2 WSI: 0.725 GS&ABUN 8 RHURAD 5 GS&ABUN 28: FRAVIR 1 WFV: 0.414 GS&ABUN 9 ALNRUG 7 GS&ABUN 29: JUNEFF 2 Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VIBREC 8 GS&ABUN 30: THAPOL 1 NO. of species:' 30 GS&ABUN 11: ROSPAL 8 INVestigator GS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.038 GS&ABUN 13: RHAFRA 5 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 195 GS&ABUN 14: VIBCAS 4 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: RUBALL 3 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.256 GS&ABUN 16: POa 20 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.300 GS&ABUN 17: ONOSEN15 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.444 GS&ABUN 18: CARSTR 8 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: IMPCAP 7 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HA028 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HA P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :H DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 134 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 32 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-4) Winkley Brook, HF HA028 Field Date: 06/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 40 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 3 0.82 T 1 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T '1 Pinus strobus White pine 6 0.18 T Populus grandidentata Large-toothed aspen 2 0.18 S 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 8 0.82 S 3 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 5 0.82 S 2 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 7 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 8 0.82 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 8 1.00 S I Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 5 0.50 S 0 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 5 0.50 S 0 Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 4 0.82 S 1 Rubus allegheniensis Blackberry 3 0.00 B 3 Poaceae Grasses 20 H 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 15 1.00 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 8 1.00 H 3 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 7 0.82 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 3 1.00 H 1 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 2 1.00 H 0 Athyrium filix-femina Lady fern 3 0.50 H 0 Galium asprellum Rough bedstraw 2 1.00 H 0 Equisetum sylvaticum Wood horsetail 2 0.82 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 2 1.-00 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 15 1.00 ' H 3 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Fragaria virginiana Strawberry 1 0.50 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 2 1.00 H 0 Thalictrum polygamum Tall meadow-rue 1 0.00 H 0 WSI: 0.725 WFV: 0.414 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.03 BUSHY: 0.20 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.05 BROADL: 0.11 NARROW: 0.25 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPRUVW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 59.6 6 WQual 60.7 2 Hydro 71.0 7 Econ . 91.3 3 GrWat 64.1 8 Recr 52.0 4 Flood 64.7 9 Aest 43.4 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 66.6 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 8.40 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HA030 PLACE: (Photo 4-4) Lamprey Rd, S of Great Hill, HF FL DATe 06/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB55 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 5 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 RHAFRA 5 GS&ABUN -13: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 SPILAT 6 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 VACCOR 4 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 SAMCAN 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.666 GS&ABUN 8 jUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.333 GS&ABUN 9 LYOLIG 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ILEVER 3 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:' 17 GS&ABUN 11: RHURAD 6 INVestigator GS Prime : GS&ABUN 12: VIBREC 8 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.009 GS&ABUN 13: OSMCIN30 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 171 GS&ABUN 14: ONOSEN30 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: UVUSES 2 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.351 GS&ABUN 16: EQUSYL 3 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.240 GS&ABUN 17: MAICAN 5 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.409 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CPU@FW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HA030 OUTIet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 29 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. S.oill 40 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-4 ) Lamprey Rd, S of Great Hill, HF HA030 Field Date: 06/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 55 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 5 0.18 T 3 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 5 0.50 S 0 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 6 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 4 0.82 S 2 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 S 1 Lyonia ligustrina Maleberry 2 1.00 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 3 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 6 0.82 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 8 0.82 S I Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 30 0.82 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H 0 Uvularia sessilifolia Sessile bellwort 2 0.18 H 0 Equisetum sylvaticum Wood horsetail 3 0.82 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 5 0.00 H 0 WSI: 0.666 WFV: 0.333 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.03 BUSHY: 0.13 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.35 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CPUVW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 - ----- ---- ----- - 1 Biol 30.2 6WQual 49.0 2 Hydro 56.5 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 33.9 8 Recr 32.8 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 30.4 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 33.3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.80 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HA032 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) S of Crank Rd, HF FL DATe 04/24/86 GS&ABUN 20: MITREP 2 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB30 GS&ABUN 21: SPHAGN35 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME12 GS&ABUN 22: MAICAN20 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETLUT 5 GS&ABUN 2-3: ONOSEN15 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PINSTR 4 GS&ABUN 24: TYPLAT10 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 QUERUB 1 GS&ABUN 25: CARSTR 8 GS&ABUN 6 TSUCAN 1 GS&ABUN 26: OSMCIN 8 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 BETLEN 1 GS&ABUN 27: SYMFOE 5 WSI: 0.720 GS&AB UN8 BETPOP 1 GS&ABUN 28: TRILLI 1 WFV: 0.304 GS&ABUN 9 RHURAD33 GS&ABUN 29: EQUARV 1 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ALNRUG18 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species,: 29 GS&ABUN 11: VIBREC12 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.006 GS&ABUN 13: pINSTR 6 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 250 GS&ABUN 14: RIBES 5 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: aCERUB 3 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.220 GS&ABUN 16: LINBEN 3 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.364 GS&ABUN 17: tSUCAN 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.416 GS&ABUN 18: ILEVER 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.140 GS&ABUN 19: VACCOR 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HA032 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P'/0 Bord OW (NLMH) :M Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) :D Dom SOil type (int) 197 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 547 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 47 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr.. Soi12 40 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Pam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):T PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) S of Crank Rd, HF HA032 Field Date: 04/24/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 30 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 12 0.82 T 1 Betula lutea Yellow birch 5 0.50 T 2 Pinus strobus White pine 4 0.18 T Quercus rubra Northern red oak 1 0.18 T 4 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 T I Betula lenta Sweet birch 1 0.18 T 2 Betula populifolia Grey birch 1 0.50 T 2 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 33 0.82 S 2 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 18 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 12 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 5 0.50 S 0 Pinus strobus White pine 6 0.18 S 3 Ribes sp. Gooseberry 5 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 3 0.50 S 3 Lindera benzoin Spicebush 3 0.82 S 1 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 2 0.50 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 2 1.00 S I Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S 2 Mitchella repens Partridge-berry 2 0.00 B 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 35 1.00 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 20 0.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 15 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 10 1.00 H 1 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 8 1.00 H 3 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 8 0.82 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 5 1.00 H 0 Trillium sp. Trillium 1 H 0 Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 1 0.50 H 0 WSI: 0.720 WFV: 0.304 . BOG: 0.140 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.14 COMPACT: 0.04 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.04 BROADL: 0.11 NARROW: 0.03 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUVIA1 WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 65.1 6 WQual 52.9 2 Hydro 68.4 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 37.7 8 Recr 41.0 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 43.4 5 ShoLi 31.0 10 Educ 63.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 7.20 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: HA034 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) N of Lamprey Rd, W of Great Hill., HF FL DATe 04/24/86 GS&ABUN 20: TYPLAT 3 Veg DENsity (HPIL) M GS&ABUN 1 PINSTR10 GS&ABUN 21: SYMFOE 4 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ACERUB50 GS&ABUN 22: CARSTR 2 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME15 GS&ABUN 23: CAREX 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 BETLUT 4 GS&ABUN 24: ONOSEN20 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 BETLEN 1 GS&ABUN 25: EQUSYL I GS&ABUN 6 QUERUB I GS&ABUN 26: EQUARV 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 FAGGRA 1 GS&ABUN 27: MAICAN 5 WSI: 0.694 GS&ABUN 8 TSUCAN 2 GS&ABUN 28: IRIVER 1 WFV: 0.432 GS&ABUN 9 BETPOP 1 GS&ABUN 29: VERVIR 1 Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: BETPAP 1 GS&ABUN 30: SPHAGN 5 NO. of species,@ 30 GS&ABUN 11: SPILAT 1 INVestigator : ASG Prime : GS&ABUN 12: VACCOR 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.016 GS&ABUN 13: aCERUB 3 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 190 GS&ABUN 14: ILEVER 4 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: ALNRUG10 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.453 GS&ABUN 16: VIBREC10 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.311 GS&ABUN 17: CORAM0 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.237 GS&ABUN 18: RHURAD25 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.026 GS&ABUN 19: RIBES 2 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MNRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :HA034 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 547 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 47 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 42 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hvdr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E 'SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) :E HPOSition (Perch.,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) N of Lamprey Rd, W of Great Hill, HF HA034 Field Date: 04/24/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Pinus strobus White pine 10 0.18 T 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 50 0.50 T 3 Ulmus' americana American elm 15 0.82 T 1 Betula lutea Yellow birch 4 0.50 T '2 Betula lenta Sweet birch 1 0.18 T 2 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 1 0.18 T 4 Fagus grandifolia Beech 1 0.18 T 3 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 2 0.50 T 1 Betula populifolia Grey birch 1 0.50 T 2 Betula papyrifera Paper birch 1 0.18 T 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 1 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 3 0.50 S 3 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 4 1.00 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 10 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 10 0.82 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 25 0.82 S 2 Ribes sp. Gooseberry 2 S 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 3 1.00 H 1 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 4 1.00 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 2 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 2 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 20 1.00 H 0 Equisetum sylvaticum Wood horsetail 1 0.82 H 0 Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 1 0.50 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 5 0.00 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 1 1.00 H 0 Veratrum viride White hellebore 1 0.82 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 5 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.693 WFV: 0.431 BOG: 0.026 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.14 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.12 NARROW: 0.03 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MNRUVW WATERSHED: Hampton Falls River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 47.2 6 WQual 58.8 2 Hydro 61.8 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 41.5 8 Recr 36.9 4 Flood 63.7 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 46.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.90 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA002 PLACE: (Photo 3-6) S of Depot Ave, HF FL DATe 04/14/86 GS&ABUN 20: ILEVER 3 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB25 GS&ABUN 21: RHURAD 5 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 BETPOP 1 GS&ABUN 22: MYRPEN 1 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTR 4 GS&ABUN 23: sALIX 5 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PRUSER 1 GS&ABUN 24: vIBLEN 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CAROVA 1 GS&ABUN 25: ALNRUG20 GS&ABUN 6 ULMAME I GS&ABUN 26: SOLIDA 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 POPTRE 2 GS&ABUN 27: LYTSAL 2 WSI: 0.615 GS&ABUN 8' QUEBIC 1 GS&ABUN 28: ONOSEN 3 WFV: 0.369 GS&ABUN 9 RHUTYP 2 GS&ABUN 29: ASTER 2 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: pINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 30: POa 5 NO. of species:' 30 GS&ABUN 11: aCERUB 5 INVestigator TLP Prime GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT25 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.022 GS&ABUN 13: VITIS 5 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW Tot ABUN: 137 GS&ABUN 14: VIBREC 6 CLaSs Richn (1-5) 2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: CORAMO 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.277 GS&ABUN 16: pOPTRE 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.620 GS&ABUN 17: ROSMUL 3 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.102 GS&ABUN 18: uLMAME 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: RHAFRA I Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA002 OUTIet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 26 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 397 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 510 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 3-6) S of Depot Ave, HF TA002 Field Date: 04/14/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 25 0.50 T 3 Betula populifolia Grey birch 1 0.50 T 2 Pinus strobus White pine 4 0.18 T 3 Prunus serotina Black cherry 1 0.18 T '3 Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 1 0.18 T 2 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 2 0.00 T 2 Quercus bicolor Swamp white oak 1 1.00 T 4 Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac 2 0.00 T 2 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 25 0.50 S 0 Vitis sp. Grapevine 5 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 6 0.82 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 1 0.00 S 2 Rosa multiflora Multiflora rose 3 0.00 S I Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.82 S 1 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 1 0.50 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 3 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 5 0.82 S 2 Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 1 0.50 S 2 Salix sp. Willow 5 0.82 S 1 Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 1 0.00 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 20 1.00 S 1 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 2 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 3 1.00 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 2 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 5 H 1 WSI: 0.615 WFV: 0.368 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.007 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.10 BUSHY: 0.22 COMPACT: 0.18 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.01 BROADL: 0.02 NARROW: 0.03 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPUV'W WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 31.0 6 WQual 44.1 2 Hydro 50.0 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 28.3 8 Recr 41.0 4 Flood 56.8 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 33.3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.20 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA004 PLACE: (Photo 3-8) N of Old Coach Lane, E of Rtl, HF FL DATe 04/15/86 GS&ABUN 20: RHURAD 3 Veo DENsity (HML) P1 GS&ABUN 1 PINSTR20 GS&ABUN 21: LYCOBS 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 ACERUB35 GS&ABUN 22: OSPICIN45 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETLUT 1 GS&ABUN 23: JUNEFF 1 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 QUEALB 1 GS&ABUN 24: PHRCOM 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 25: DRYSPI I GS&ABUN 6 JUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 26: TYPLAT 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 NYSSYL 1 GS&ABUN 27: POa 2 WSI: 0.647 GS&AB*UN 8 VIBREC 5 GS&ABUN 28: COPGRP 8 WFV: 0.341 GS&ABUN 9 CLEALN 6 GS&ABUN 29: ONOSEN 3 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUNI 10: ILEVER 7 GS&ABUN 30: SYMFOE 2 NO. of species: . 30 GS&ABUN 11: aCERUB 4 INVestigator TLP Prime GS&ABUN 12: LINBEN 3 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.027 GS&ABUN 13: HAMVIR 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 167 GS&ABUN 14: vIBLEN 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: pINSTR 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.359 GS&ABUN 16: SPILAT 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.252 GS&ABUN 17: VACCOR 6 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.389 GS&ABUN 18: LYOLIG 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): C Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: ROSPAL 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MPUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA004 OUTlet2 (APE) :E 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 214 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 497 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 313 POP'n density (LMH) :M Other Surr. Soi12 40 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Pam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :L or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):O PERmeabil (LMH):H INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 3-8) N of Old Coach Lane, E of Rtl, HF TA004 Field Date: 04/15/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Pinus strobus White pine 20 0.18 T 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 35 0.50 T 3 Betula lutea Yellow birch 1 0.50 T 2 Quercus alba White oak 1 0.18 T 4 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T I Nyssa sylvatica Black gum, tupelo 1 0.82 T 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 5 0.82 S 1 Clethra alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 6 0.82 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 7 1.00 S I Acer rubrum Red maple 4 0.50 S 3 Lindera benzoin Spicebush 3 0.82 S 1 Hamamelis virginiana Witchhazel 2 0.18 S 0 Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 2 0.00 S 1 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 1 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 6 0.82 S 2 Lyonia ligustrina Maleberry 1 1.00 S 0 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S I Rhus radicans Poison ivy 3 0.82 S 2 Lycopodium obscurum Ground pine 1 0.18 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 45 0.82 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 1 1.00 H 0 Phragmites communis Reed 1 0.82 H 0 Dryopteris spinulosa Spinulose shieldfern 1 0.82 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 1 1.00 H 1 Poaceae Grasses 2 H 1 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 8 0.82 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 3 1.00 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 2 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.647 WFV: 0.341 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.05 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.01 BROADL: 0.35 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MPUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 61.2 6 WQual 60.7 2 Hydro 69.7 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 60.3 8 Recr 49.3 4 Flood 64.7 9 Aest 43.4 5 ShoLi 14.4 10 Educ 58.7 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 7.90 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA007 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Rt88, between Cock Hill Rd & 195, HF FL DATe 03/27/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB15 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 VIBREC60 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: L GS&ABUN 5 ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 SPILAT 5 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 pINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.799 GS&AB UN8 ONOSEN25 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.281 GS&ABUN 9 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:' 8 GS&ABUN 11: INVestigator ASG Prime GS&ABUN 12: Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.000 GS&ABUN 13: SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: - 128 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.133 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta lntersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.672 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.195 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CPUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA007 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*/0' Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :C FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 68 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :N Dom Surround Soil 538 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :M Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):6 RIPArian conn (YN) :N INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):T PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :R INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :A NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y -Location: (Photo 4-6) Rt88, between Cock Hill Rd & 195, HF TA007. Field Date: 03/27/86 Report Date: 06/26/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 60 0.82 S 'i Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 5 0.50 S 0 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 25 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.798 WFV: 0.281 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.58 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.19 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES-CPUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Wetland R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 32.5. 6 WQual 51.9 2 Hydro 3.94, 7 Econ 39.1 3 GrWat 20.7 8 Recr 12.3 4 Flood 58.8 9 Aest 27.5 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 25.3 ------- ------ -- --- ------- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 1.90 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA008 PLACE: (Photo 3-8) Kenney Brook, N of Rt88, HF FL DATe 03/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: SOLIDA 1 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB25 GS&ABUN 21: SPHAGN 4 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 QUERUB 3 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETLUT 4 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 QUEALB 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CORAMO 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 VIBCAS 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 tSUCAN 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.663 GS&ABUN 8 KALANG 2 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.411 GS&ABUN 9 ILEVER 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VACCOR 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 21 GS&ABUN 11: ALNRUG 5 INVestigator ASG Prime : I GS&ABUN 12: CLEALN 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.014 GS&ABUN 13: SAMCAN 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 73 GS&ABUN 14: VIBREC 3 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: sALIX 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.452 GS&ABUN 16: HAMVIR 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.301 GS&ABUN 17: ONOSEN 6 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.247 GS&ABUN 18: COPGRO 5 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.055 GS&ABUN 19: ASTER 2 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMPUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA008 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P'/O Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 313 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :L or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):4 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 3-8) Kenney Brook, N of Rt88, HF TA008 Field Date: 03/28/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 25 0.50 T 3 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 3 0.18 T 4 Betula lutea. Yellow birch 4 0.50 T @2 Quercus alba White oak 1 0.18 T 4 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 1 0.82 S 1 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 S 1 Kalmia angustifolia Sheep laurel 2 0.50 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 2 1.00 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 5 1.00 S 1 Clethra alnifolia Sweet pepperbush 2 0.82 S 0 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 3 0.82 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 S 1 Hamamelis virginiana. Witchhazel 1 0.18 S 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 6 1.00 H 0 Coptis groenlandica. Goldthread 5 O.S2 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 2 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 1 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 4 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.662 WFV: 0.410 BOG: 0.054 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.23 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.15 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMPUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 30.2 6 WQual 47.0 2 Hydro 46.0 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 30.1 8 Recr 21.9 4 Flood 47.0 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 33.3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 2.40 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA015 PLACE: (Photo 5-10)Taylor River, between Mill Rd &Towle Rd, 'HA HF FL DATe 06/25/86 GS&ABUN 20: IMPCAP10 Veg DENsity (HML) : L GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB 2 GS&ABUN 21: POa 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 QUERUB 1 GS&ABUN 22: TYPLAT 8 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 TILAME 1 GS&ABUN 23: CAREX 3 Lo Vernal pool): H GS&ABUN 4 TSUCAN 1 GS&ABUN 24: ONOSEN 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CAROVA 1 GS&ABUN 25: POTEM010 GS&ABUN 6 PINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 26: PONCOR 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 VIBREC 2 GS&ABUN 27: CARCRI 1 WSI: 0.881 GS&ABUN 8 RHURAD 1 GS&ABUN 28: JUNEFF 1 WFV: 0.231 GS&ABUN 9 cARCAR 1 GS&ABUN 29: CERDEM 4 Perc. Wild. Foqd: M GS&ABUN 10: uLMAME 1 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species; 29 GS&ABUN 11: SAMCAN I INVestigator GS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ALNRUG 3 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 1 Aesthetic: 0.114 GS&ABUN 13: ROSPAL 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW Tot ABUN: 79 GS&ABUN 14: SPILAT 1 CLaSs Richn (1-5) 5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: DRYTHE 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.089 GS&ABUN 16: SAGLAT 3 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.139 GS&ABUN 17: SPARGA 5 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.772 GS&ABUN 18: EQUPRA I Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): A Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: LEMMIN10 Percent Open W (LDIHV): H SBTY FNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA015 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HA HF P','. Bord OW (NLMH) :H Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :H Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) :D Dom SOil type (int) 6 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Isoj :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (L@IH) :L Other Surr. Soil2 40 loc SCARCity (LMH) :H wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THlckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (L@JH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-10) Taylor River, between Mill Rd &Towle Rd, HA HF TA015 Field Date: 06/25/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 2 0.50 T 3 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 1 0.18 T 4 Tilia americana Basswood 1 0.18 T 1 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 T 1 Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 1 0.18 T 2 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 T 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 2 0.82 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 1 0.82 S 2 Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 1 0.50 S 1 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 3 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 1 0.50 S 0 Dryopteris thelypteris Marsh fern 1 1.00 H 0 Sagittaria latifolia Arrowhead 3 1.00 H 1 Sparganium sp. Burreed 5 1.00 H 1 Equisetum pratense Meadow horsetail 1 0.82 H 0 Lemna minor Duckweed 10 1.00 H 1 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 10 0.82 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 1 H 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 8 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 3 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 1 1.00 H 0 Potemogeton sp. Pondweed 10 1.00 H 0 Pontederia cordata Pickerel weed 2 1.00 H 3 Carex crinita. Fringed sedge 1 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 1 1.00 H 0 Ceratophyllum demersum Coontail 4 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.880 WFV: 0.231 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.02 BUSHY: 0.08 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.30 BROADL: 0.08 NARROW: 0.07 FLOATING: 0.30 SUBTYPES:FNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Open Freshwater Wetland R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 57.3 6 WQual 44.1 2 Hydro 72.3 7 Econ 30.4 3 GrWat 50.9 8 Recr 71.2 4 Flood 50.0 9 Aest 86.9 5 ShoLi 44.8 10 Educ 63.4 ------------------------------ ------------------- ----------- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA017 PLACE: (Photo 4-8) Brown Rd, W of 195, HF FL DATe 04/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: SOLIDA 1 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB 1 GS&ABUN 21: LYTSAL 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 VIBLEN 1 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 JUNVIR I GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 BERVUL 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: L GS&ABUN 5 ALNRUG 7 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 aCERUB 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 VIBREC 2 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.923 GS&ABUN 8 ROSPAL 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.266 GS&ABUN 9 SPILAT 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ILEVER 1 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species@' 21 GS&ABUN 11: LONICE 1 INVestigator TLP Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ONOSEN 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.016 GS&ABUN 13: SCICYP 1 Spec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 92 GS&ABUN 14: POa 10 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: CAREX 12 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.033 GS&ABUN 16: JUNEFF10 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.174 GS&ABUN 17: TYPLAT30 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.793 GS&ABUN 18: PHRCOM 5 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): C Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: ASTER 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA017 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*/,' Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH), :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 95 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :I Other Surr. Soill 313 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :L or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-8) Brown Rd, W of 195, HF TA017 Field Date: 04/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 1 0.50 T 3 Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 1 0.00 T 1 -Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T B_e rbierf s-Vu--lj_aFi_s -----Common barberry 1 S Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 7 1.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 1 0.50 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 2 0.82 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S 1 S_i-fa@ea lat.ifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 P Ilex verticillata -,--Winterberry 1 1.00 S 1 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 2 1.00 H 0 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 1 1.00 H 3 Poaceae Grasses 10 H I Carex sp. Sedge 12 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 10 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 30 1.00 H 1 Phragmites communis Reed 5 0.82 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 1 H 0 Solidago sp. 'Goldenrod 1 H 0 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 1 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.923 WFV: 0.266 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.13 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.39 BROADL: 0.02 NARROW: 0.35 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 59.6 6 WQual 58.8 2 Hydro 57.8 7 Econ 34.7 3 GrWat 30.1 8 Recr 35.6 4 Flood 51.9 9 Aest 42.0 5 ShoLi 11.3 10 Educ 41.2 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA018 PLACE: (Photo 4-6,8) Brown Rd, W of 195, HF FL DATe 04/14/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) H GS&ABUN 1 LONICE 1 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 jUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ALNRUG12 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ROSPAL 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CARSTR 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 IRIVER 2 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 MYOSOT 4 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.869 GS&ABUN 8 JUNEFF15 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.273 GS&ABUN 9 POa 65 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. F-oo=d--- M GS&ABUN 10: SOLIDA 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO' of -species:' 18 GS&ABUN 11: ASTER 2 INVestigator GS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: DAUCAR 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.045 GS&ABUN 13: CAREX 20 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 143 GS&ABUN 14: POA 10 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N. GS&ABUN 15: PLAMAJ 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.000 GS&ABUN 16: TYPLAT 2 VEGeta Intersp-CHML) M Shrubs: 0.105 GS&ABUN 17: EPILEP 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.895 GS&ABUN 18: RANUNC 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY 'NRU Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA018 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 95 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 313 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):4 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6,8) Brown Rd, W of 195, HF TA018 Field Date: 04/14/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 0 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 12 1.00 S -'-k'os-a palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S 11 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 1 1.00 H 3 Iris versicolor Blue flag 2 1.00 H 0 Myosotis sp. Forget-me-not 4 0.00 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 15 1.00 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 65 H 1 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 2 H 0 Daucus carota Queen anne's lace 1 0.00 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 20 1.00 H 3 Poa sp. Grass 10 H 1 Plantago major Common plantain 1 0.18 H 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 Epilobium leptophyllum Narrow-leaf willowweed 1 0.50 H 1 Ranunculus sp. Buttercup 2 H 0 WSI: 0.868 WFV: 0.272 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.09 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.81 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NRU WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 53.4 6 WQual 52.9 2 Hydro 47.3 7.Econ 47.8 3 GrWat 28.3 8 Recr 32.8 4 Flood 54.9 9 Aest 55.0 5 ShoLi 13.4 10 Educ 66.6 ------- ------ -- --- ------- --------- --- ----- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.60 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA019 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) W of North Rd, HF FL DATe 03/26/86 GS&ABUN 20: LONICE 1 Veg DENsity (H.4L) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB30 GS&ABUN 21: VITIS 2 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME40 GS&ABUN 22: ONOSEN30 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 SALIX 2 GS&ABUN 23: ASTER 5 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 CAROVA 1 GS&ABUN 24: CAREX 2 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 BETPOP 2 GS&ABUN 25: SOLIDA 2 GS&ABUN 6 BETLEN I GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'PINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.748 GS&ABUN 8 QUERUB 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.348 GS&ABUN 9 TSUCAN 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: POPTRE 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 25 GS&ABUN 11: FRAAME 2 INVestigator ASG Prime : GS&ABUN 12: JUNVIR 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.015 GS&ABUN 13: aCERUB 8 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 164 GS&ABUN 14: RHURAD 5 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: ILEVER 2 SuMpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.518 GS&ABUN 16: ALNRUG15 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.244 GS&ABUN 17: VIBREC 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.238 GS&ABUN 18: VACCOR 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: ROSA 3 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY PUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA019 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 38 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GIAI Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) W of North Rd, HF TA019 Field Date: 03/26/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 30 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 40 0.82 T 1 Salix sp. Willow 2 0.82 T Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 1 0.18 T Betula populifolia Grey birch 2 0.50 T 2 Betula lenta Sweet birch 1 0.18 T 2 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 T 3 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 1 0.18 T 4 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 2 0.50 T 1 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 2 0.00 T 2 Fraxinus americana White ash 2 0.50 T 1 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 8 0.50 S 3 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 5 0.82 S 2 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 2 1.00 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 2 0.82 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Rosa sp. Rose 3 S 1 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 0 Vitis sp. Grapevine 2 S 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 5 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 2 1.00 H 3 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 WSI: 0.748 WFV: 0.347 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.13 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.18 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:PUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 35.6 6 WQual 48.0 2 Hydro 52.6 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 32.0 8 Recr 32.8 4 Flood 64.7 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi' 0,00 10 Educ 38.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.10 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA020 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) North Rd, near jct with Rt88, HF FL DATe 04/14/86 GS&ABUN 20: TYPLAT 3 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB35 GS&ABUN 21: POa 2 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PRUSER 1 GS&ABUN 22: ONOSEN18 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME I GS&ABUN 23: SOLIDA 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 VACCOR 1 GS&ABUN 24: ASTER 2 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 PRUVIR 1 GS&ABUN 25: MYOSOT 2 GS&ABUN 6 ALNRUG25 GS&ABUN 26: RANUNC 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'SPILAT 2 GS&ABUN 27: EPICOL 1 WSI: 0.715 GS&ABUN 8 uLMAME 1 GS&ABUN 28: IMPCAP 8 WFV: 0.326 GS&ABUN 9 sALIX 1 GS&ABUN 29: MATSTR 1 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: PARQUI 1 GS&ABUN 30: VIOLA 1 NO. of species:, 30 GS&ABUN 11: ILEVER 1 INVestigator : GS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: SAMCAN 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.060 GS&ABUN 13: VIBREC 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 125 GS&ABUN 14: LONICE 4 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: RUBALL 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.296 GS&ABUN 16: RUBHIS 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.324 GS&ABUN 17: OSMREG 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.380 GS&ABUN 18: OSMCIN 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: POLARI 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY NRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA020 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 95 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 38 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 32 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) North Rd, near jct with Rt88, HF TA020 Field Date: 04/14/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 35 0.50 T 3 Prunus serotina Black cherry 1 0.18 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Va'ccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S Prunus virginiana Choke cherry 1 0.00 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 25 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 S 1 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper 1 0.00 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 1 1.00 S 1 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 1 0.82 S 1 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 4 0.00 S 0 Rubus allegheniensis Blackberry 1 0.00 B 3 Rubus hispidus Trailing bramble 2 0.50 B 3 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 2 0.82 -H 0 Polygonum arifolium Halberd-leaf smartweed 1 1.00 H 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 3 1.00 H 1 Poaceae Grasses 2 H 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 18 1.00 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 2 H 0 Myosotis sp. Forget-me-not 2 0.00 H 0 Ranunculus sp. Buttercup 2 H 0 Epilobium coloratum Purple willowweed 1 1.00 H 1 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 8 0.82 H 0 Mattuccia struthiopteris Ostrich fern 1 0.82 H 0 Viola sp. Violet 1 H 0 WSI: 0.715 WFV: 0.326 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.27 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.08 BROADL: 0.17 NARROW: 0.04 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NRU,VW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 43.4 6 WQual 44.1 2 Hydro 52.6 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 26.4 8 Recr 26.0 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 46.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.10 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA023 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Jct Rt88 & North Rd, HF FL DATe 03/26/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB25 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 POPTRE 2 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 RHUTYP 2 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: L GS&ABUN 5 LONMOR 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 ROSPAL10 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 aCERUB20 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.675 GS&ABUN 8 SPILAT15 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.419 GS&ABUN 9 VIBREC 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: ALNRUG30 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 13 GS&ABUN 11: sALIX 3 INVestigator ASG Prime GS&ABUN 12: RUBALL 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.043 GS&ABUN 13: ONOSEN 4 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 117 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.256 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.701 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 3 Herbs 0.043 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CPUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA023 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*/O' Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :C FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. -N Dom Surround Soil 68 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill POP'n density (LMH) :M Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):6 RIPArian conn (YN) :N INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (IMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :R INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :A NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) Jct Rt88 & North Rd, HF TA023 Field Date: 03/26/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 25 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Popuius tremuloides Quaking aspen 2 0.00 T @2 Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac 2 0.00 T 2 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 10 1.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 20 0.50 S 3 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 15 0.50 S 0 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 2 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 30 1.00 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 3 0.82 S 1 Rubus allegheniensis Blackberry 2 0.00 B 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 4 1.00 H 0 -WSI: 0.674 WFV: 0.418 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.19 BUSHY: 0.36 COMPACT: 0.12 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.03 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CPUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 20.1 6 WQual 44.1 2 Hydro 3.94 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 32.0 8 Recr 19.1 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 25.3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 2.10 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA025 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Kenney Brook, between 195 & Rtl, N of Rt88, HF FL DATe 04/14/86 GS&ABUN 20: TYPLAT 2 Veg DENsity (HML) : M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB50 GS&ABUN 21: ASTER 3 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 BETPOP 2 GS&ABUN 22: SOLIDA 3 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 2 GS&ABUN 23: ONOSEN30 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PRUSER 1 GS&ABUN 24: OSMCIN15 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ALNRUG 5 GS&ABUN 25: SPHAGN 8 GS&ABUN 6 PARQUI 2 GS&ABUN 26: COPGRO 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 RHURAD15 GS&ABUN 27: POLSAG 1 WSI: 0.722 GS&ABUN 8 pINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 28: RANUNC 2 WFV: 0.344 GS&ABUN 9 SAMCAN 1 GS&ABUN 29: CAREX 2 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: pOPTRE 2 GS&ABUN 30: IMPCAP 2 NO. of species; 30 GS&ABUN 11: VACCOR 2 INVestigator : GS Prime : I GS&ABUN 12: VIBREC 8 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.014 GS&ABUN 13: ILEVER 3 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 173 GS&ABUN 14: SPILAT 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: VIBCAS 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.318 GS&ABUN 16: RHAFRA 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.269 GS&ABUN 17: LONICE 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.413 GS&ABUN 18: RUBHIS 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.046 GS&ABUN 19: SMILAX 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA025 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 313 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :L or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):2 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW` Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) -P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 GII C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) Kenney Brook, between 195 & Rtl, N of Rt88, HF TA025 Field Date: 04/14/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 50 0.50 T 3 Betula populifolia Grey birch 2 0.50 T 2 01mus americana American elm 2 0.82 T Prunus serotina Black cherry 1 0.18 T Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 5 1.00 S 1 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper 2 0.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 15 0.82 S 2 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 2 0.00 S 2 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 8 0.82 S I Ilex verticillata Winterberry 3 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 1 0.82 S 1 Rhamnus frangula. Europ. buckthorn 1 0.50 S 0 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 2 0.00 S 0 Rubus hispidus Trailing bramble 2 0.50 B 3 Smilax sp. Greenbriar 1 0.50 B 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 Aster sp. Asters 3 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 3 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 15 0.82 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 8 1.00 H 0 Coptis groenlandica. Goldthread 2 0.82 H 0 Polygonum saggitatum Arrow-leaved tearthumb 1 1.00 H 3 Ranunculus sp. Buttercup 2 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 2 1.00 H 3 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 2 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.721 WFV: 0.343 BOG: 0.046 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.13 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.27 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T & 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 34.8 6 WQual 39.2 2 Hydro 38.1 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 30.1 8 Recr 21.9 4 Flood 37.2 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 33.3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 2.80 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA026 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) W of Rtl, N of Rt88, HF FL DATe 03/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB30 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME10 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal--pool): L GS&ABUN 4 SASALB 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 BETLUT 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 TSUCAN 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'ALNRUG 5 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.756 GS&ABUN 8 VIBREC 9 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.328 GS&ABUN 9 aCESAC 1 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Foc%d: M GS&ABUN 10: VACCOR 3 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 17 GS&ABUN 11: aCERUB15 INVestigator ASG Prime : I GS&ABUN 12: ONOSEN20 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.000 GS&ABUN 13: OSMCIN15 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW Tot ABUN: 144 GS&ABUN 14: SPHAGN20 CLaSs Richn (1-5) 3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: COPGRO 5 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.319 GS&ABUN 16: TYPLAT 3 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.229 GS&ABUN 17: CAREX 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.451 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.139 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA026 OUTIet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*,' Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FE'0Tch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :L DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 214 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 313 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):O PERmeabil (LMH):H INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :H OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) W of Rtl, N of Rt88, HF TA026 Field Date: 03/28/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 30 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 10 0.82 T 1 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 T 3 Sassafras albidum Sassafras 1 0.18 T '0 Betula lutea Yellow birch 1 0.50 T 2 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 T 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 5 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 9 0.82 S 1 Acer saccharum Sugar maple 1 0.18 S 3 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 3 0.82 S 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 S 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 20 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 15 0.82 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 20 1.00 H 0 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 5 0.82 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 3 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 2 1.00 H 3 WSI: 0.755 WFV: 0.328 BOG: 0.138 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: O.il BUSHY: 0.11 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.27 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 34.1 6 WQual 41.1 2 Hydro 44.7 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 62.2 8 Recr 21.9 4 Flood 58.8 9 Aest 34.7 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 38.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 3.30 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUM14ARY WID: TA027 PLACE: (Photo 4-6) Kenney Brook, between 195 & Rtl, S of Rt88, HF Fl, DATe 04/14/86 GS&ABUN 20: HYPVIR 1 Veg DENsity (HML) : H GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB40 GS&ABUN 21: ASCINC 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 22: SCICYP 1 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETPOP 1 GS&ABUN 23: LYTSAL 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 VIBLEN 2 GS&ABUN 24: CAREX 3 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CORAMO 2 GS&ABUN 25: CALPAL 1 GS&ABUN 6 sALIX 2 GS&ABUN 26: MIMRIN 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 27: ONOSEN55 WSI: 0.818 GS&ABUN 8 VACCOR 6 GS&ABUN 28: POa 7 IWIFV: 0.250 GS&ABUN 9 SPITOM 1 GS&ABUN 29: SOLIDA 6 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ILEVER15 GS&ABUN 30: SPHAGN15 NO. of species@ 30 GS&ABUN 11: VIBREC40 INVestigator GS Prime GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.039 GS&ABUN 13: SAMCAN 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 259 GS&ABUN 14: aCERUB 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: VITIS 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.178 GS&ABUN 16: LONICE 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.351 GS&ABUN 17: RUBHIS 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 3 Herbs 0.471 GS&ABUN 18: OSMCIN20 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.058 GS&ABUN 19: JUNEFF 8 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MNUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA027 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*A0' Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (L111H):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-6) Kenney Brook, between 195 & Rt15 S of Rt88, HF TA027 Field Date: 04/14/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 40 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 T 3 Betula populifolia. Grey birch 1 0.50 T 12 Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 2 0.00 T 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 2 0.82 S I Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S I Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 6 0.82 S 2 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 1 0.50 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 15 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 40 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 2 0.18 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 2 0.50 S 3 Vitis sp. Grapevine 1 S 3 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 2 0.00 S 0 Rubus hispidus Trailing bramble 2 0.50 B 3 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 20 0.82 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 8 1.00 H 0 Hypericum virginicum Marsh st. johnswort 1 1.00 H 0 Asclepias incarnata Swamp milkweed 1 1.00 H 0 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 1 1.00 H 3 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 2 1.00 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 3 1.00 H 3 Caltha palustris Marsh marigold 1 1.00 H 0 Mimulus ringens Monkey-flower 1 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 55 1.00 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 7 H 1 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 6 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 15 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.817 WFV: 0.250 BOG: 0.057 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.31 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.29 NARROW: 0.07 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MNUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 45.7 6 WQual 63.7 2 Hydro 64.4 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 37.7 8 Recr 30.1 4 Flood 68.6 9 Aest 31.8 5 ShoLi 19.6 10 Educ 41.2 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.70 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA030 PLACE: (Photo 5-6) Headwaters of Grapevine Run, HF FL DATe 04/18/86 GS&ABUN 20: ONOSEN30 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB15 GS&ABUN 21: CALPAL 1 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 22: SYMFOE 2 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 JUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 23: EQUISE I Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 24: SOLIDA 2 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ROSPAL 1 GS&ABUN 25: SPHAGN 5 GS&ABUN 6 SAMCAN 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 VACCOR 2 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.843 GS&ABUN 8 ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.381 GS&ABUN 9 aCERUB10 GS&ABUN 29:- Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: pINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 25 GS&ABUN 11: VIBREC 3 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ILEVER 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.024 GS&ABUN 13: LONMOR 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW Tot ABUN: 168 GS&ABUN 14: RHURAD 6 CLaSs Richn (1-5) 5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SPILAT 3 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.119 GS&ABUN 16: RUBOCC 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.304 GS&ABUN 17: RUBIDA 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.577 GS&ABUN 18: TYPLAT25 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): A Bog 0.030 GS&ABUN 19: CARSTR30 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA030 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P%' Bord OW (NLMH) :M Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 197 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) :E HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-6) Headwaters of Grapevine Run, HF TA030 Field Date: 04/18/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 T 3 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T '11 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T- '1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S 1 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 10 0.50 S 3 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 3 0.82 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 5 1.00 S 1 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 2 0.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 6 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 3 0.50 S 0 Rubus occidentalis Black raspberry 1 0.00 B 3 Rubus idaeus Red raspberry 1 0.00 B 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 25 1.00 H 1 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 30 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H 0 Caltha palustris Marsh marigold 1 1.00 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 2 1.00 H 0 Equisetum sp. Horsetail I H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 5 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.843 WFV: 0.380 BOG: 0.029 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.07 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.14 BROADL: 0.19 NARROW: 0.18 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MNPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ I Biol 84.4 6 WQual 68.6 2 Hydro 72.3 7 Econ 65.2 3 GrWat 54.7 8 Recr 43.8 4 Flood 64.7 9 Aest 59.4 5 ShoLi 22.7 10 Educ 71.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 8.60 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA033 PLACE: (Photo 5-6) Cock Hill Rd, N of Crank Rd, HF FL DATe 03/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsitv (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB50 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 FRAAME 4 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTR 6 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ACESAC 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 uLMAME10 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 aCERUB20 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 pINSTR 6 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.512 GS&ABUN 8 VACCOR 4 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.582 GS&ABUN 9 tSUCAN 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: aCESAC 6 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species@' 15 GS&ABUN 11: LONMOR 1 INVestigator ASG Prime : GS&ABUN 12: ONOSEN 3 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.000 GS&ABUN 13: SPHAGN 6 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 128 GS&ABUN 14: POa 6 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :2 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: GAUPRO 3 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): E Trees : 0.477 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.383 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.141 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.047 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA033 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P'% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETcb (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 29 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-6) Cock Hill Rd, N of Crank Rd, HF TA033 Field Date: 03/28/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 50 0.50 T 3 Fraxinus americana White ash 4 0.50 T 1 Pinus strobus White pine 6 0.18. T .3 Acer saccharum Sugar maple 1 0.18 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 10 0.82 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 20 0.50. S 3 Pinus strobus White pine 6 0.18 S 3 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 4 0.82 S 2 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 2 0.50 S 1 Acer saccharum Sugar maple 6 0.18 S 3 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 3 1.00 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 6 1.00 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 6 H 1 Gaultheria procumbens Wintergreen 3 0.18 H 0 WSI: 0.511 WFV: 0.582 BOG: 0.046 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.34 BUSHY: 0.03 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.02 NARROW: 0.04 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------- ----- ------------ ------- ----- ------------ I Biol 34.1 6 WQual 49.0 2 Hydro 61.8 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 33.9 8 Recr 32.8 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 26.0 5 ShoLi 11*5 10 Educ 28.5 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.40 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA034 PLACE: (Photo 5-6,8) Grapevine Run, S of Rt88, HF FL DATe 03/28/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB30 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 QUERUB 2 GS&ABUN 22: W. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETPAP 1 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 POPTRE 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ULMAME 6 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 FAGGRA 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'PINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.700 GS&ABUN 8 CORAMO 4 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.472 GS&ABUN 9 sALNIG 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:' 18 GS&ABUN 11: ROSPAL 5 INVestigator ASG Prime : GS&ABUN 12: LINBEN 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.028 GS&ABUN 13: SALDIS 3 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 90 GS&ABUN 14: SPILAT 4 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: VIBREC 4 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.489 GS&ABUN 16: TYPLAT 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.422 GS&ABUN 17: SCICYP 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.089 GS&ABUN 18: ONOSEN 4 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA034 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 43 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 40 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :P SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location:, (Photo 5-6,8) Grapevine Run, S of Rt88, HF TA034 Field Date: 03/28/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 30 0.50 T 3 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 2 0.18 T 4 Betula papyrifera Paper birch 1 0.18 T 2 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 1 0.00 T 2 Ulmus americana American elm 6 0.82 T I Fagus grandifolia Beech 1 0.18 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 T 3 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 4 0.82 S 3 Salix nigra Black willow 2 1.00 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 5 1.00 S 1 Lindera benzoin Spicebush 1 0.82 S I Salix discolor Pussy willow 3 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 4 0.50 S 0 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 4 0.82 S 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 Sci-r-pus cyperinus Woolgrass 2 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 4 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.700 WFV: 0.472 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0..05 BUSHY: 0.32 COMPACT: 0.04 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.04 NARROW: 0.02 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 53.4 6 WQual 56.8 2 Hydro 65.7 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 39.6 8 Recr 41.0 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 53.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.50 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA036 PLACE: (Photo 5-8) Grapevine Run, Rt88, HF FL DATe 04/01/86 GS&ABUN 20: LYTSAL 5 Veg DENsity (HML) H GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB 7 GS&ABUN 21: TYPANG 4 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 22: CAREX'25 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETPOP 2 GS&ABUN 23: ASTER 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 POPTRE 1 GS&ABUN 24: SOLIDA 4 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 SALIX 12 GS&ABUN 25: ONOSEN10 GS&ABUN 6 uLMAME 1 GS&ABUN 26: JUNEFF 5 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ALNRUG30 GS&ABUN 27: LYCOPU 1 WSI: 0.824 GS&ABUN 8 VIBREC15 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.320 GS&ABUN 9 CORSTO 3 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ROSPAL 5 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species@' 27 GS&ABUN 11: SPILAT 7 INVestigator HCS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: RHURAD10 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.027 GS&ABUN 13: LONICE12 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 188 GS&ABUN 14: POa 5 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SCICYP 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees 0.128 GS&ABUN 16: CARSTR 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.441 GS&ABUN 17: CAREXA 3 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.431 GS&ABUN 18: EPILEP 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: TYPLAT12 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA036 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF PI/o Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S PETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 197 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 510 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 44 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Pam Com):C Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FRO@l OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-8) Grapevine Run, Rt88, HF TA036 Field Date: 04/01/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 7 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T 3 Betula populifolia Grey birch 2 0.50 T 2 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 1 0.00 T 112 Salix sp. Willow 12 0.82 T 1 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 30 1.00 S I Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 15 0.82 S 1 Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood 3 0.82 S 3 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 5 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 7 0.50 S 0 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 10 0.82 S 2 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 12 0.00 S 0 Poaceae Grasses 5 H 1 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 1 1.00 H 3 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 2 1.00 H 3 Carex sp.(A) A Sedge 3 1.00 H 3 Epilobium leptophyllum Narrow-leaf willowweed 2 0.50 H 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 12 1.00 H 1 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 5 1.00 H 0 Typha angustifolia Narrowleaf cattail 4 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 25 1.00 H 3 Aster sp. Asters 2 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 4 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 10 1.00 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 5 1.00 H 0 Lycopus sp. Waterhorehound 1 H 0 WSI: 0.823 WFV: 0.320 BOG: 0 .000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.34 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.11 BROADL: 0.05 NARROW: 0.23 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 65.8 6 WQual 65.6 2 Hydro 64.4 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 37.7 8 Recr 34.2 4 Flood 61.7 9 Aest 40.5 5 ShoLi 19.6 10 Educ 66.6 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA037 PLACE: (Photo 4-8,5-8) Grapevine Run, between Rt88 & North Rd-, HF FL DATe 04/09/86 GS&ABUN 20: ONOSEN18 Veg DENsity (HML) : H GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB11 GS&ABUN 21: CAREX 19 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR10 GS&ABUN 22: SPHAGN 5 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETPOP 1 GS&ABUN 23: OSMREG 1 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 24: OSMClN 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 FRAAME 1 GS&ABUN 25: POa 1 GS&ABUN 6 aCERUB 1 GS&ABUN 26: JUNEFF 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 uLMAME 1 GS&ABUN 27: SOLIDA 1 WSI: 0,850 GS&ABUN 8 VIBREC 6 GS&ABUN 28: ASTER. 1 WFV: 0.340 GS&ABUN 9 ALNRUG 9 GS&ABUN 29: TYPLAT19 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ROSPAL 4 GS&ABUN 30: CAREXA 4 NO. of species:. 30 GS&ABUN 11: LONICE I INVestigator : HCS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ILEVER 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.071 GS&ABUN 13: SPILAT 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 141 GS&ABUN 14: RHAFRA 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: LYOLIG 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.170 GS&ABUN 16: VACCOR 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.245 GS&ABUN 17: CORAMO 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.585 GS&ABUN 18: RUBHIS 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.035 GS&ABUN 19: LYTSAL11 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MNRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA037 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*/,O' Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 197 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 538 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 33 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 197 POP'n density (L@IH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 547 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L INL5 (APE) OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-8,5-8) Grapevine Run, between Rt88 & North Rd, HF TA037 Field Date: 04/09/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 11 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine '10 0.18 T 3 Betul*a populifolia Grey birch 1 0.50 T 2 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T Fraxinus americana White ash 1 0.50 T 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 1 0.50 S 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 6 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 9 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 4 1.00 S I Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 5 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 2 0.50 S 0 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 2 0.50 S 0 Lyonia ligustrina Maleberry 1 1.00 S 0 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S 2 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Rubus hispidus Trailing bramble 1 0.50 B 3 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 11 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 18 1.00 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 19 1.00 H 3 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 5 1.00 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 1 0.82 H Poaceae Grasses 1 H 1 Juncus effusus Soft rush 1 1.00 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 1 - H 0 Aster sp. Asters 1 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 19 1.00 H 1 Carex sp.(A) A Sedge 4 1.00 H 3 WSI: 0.850 WFV: 0.340 BOG: 0.035 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.21 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.21 BROADL: 0.14 NARROW: 0.17 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MNRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 46.5 6 WQual 57.8 2 Hydro 59.2 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 50.9 8 Recr 36.9 4 Flood 67.6 9 Aest 39,1 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 53.9 - ----- ---- --- -- ---- ---- --------- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.20 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA039 PLACE: (Photo 5-8) Mill Rd, HF FL DATe 04/03/86 GS&ABUN 2D: RUBIDA I Veg DENsity (HML) H GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB10 GS&ABUN 21: OSMCIN 4 wetl JUXtapos(HML): L GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 22: SCICYP 2 w. level-FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTR30 GS&ABUN 23- TYPLAT 5 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 JUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 24: ONOSEN15 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 BETLUT 1 GS&ABUN 25: CAREXA 8 GS&ABUN 6 VACCOR 2 GS&ABUN 26: JUNEFF 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 @LONICE 2 GS&ABUN 27: CARSTR 2 WSI: 0.713 GS&ABUN 8 VIBREC 3 GS&ABUN 28: SPHAGN 1 WFV: 0.441 GS&ABUN 9 aCERUB 3 GS&ABUN 29: EPICOL 1 Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: uLMAME 1 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 29 GS&ABUN 11: RHURAD50 INVestigator HCS Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ILEVER15 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.047 GS&ABUN 13: SPILAT 8 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 181 GS&ABUN 14: ALNRUG 6 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: ROSPAL I SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.238 GS&ABUN 16: SPITOM 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.539 GS&ABUN 17: sALIX 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.224 GS&ABUN 18: CORSTO 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): B Bog 0.006 GS&ABUN 19: VITIS 1 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA039 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P'/0 Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) .:M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 95 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 510 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 14 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or'Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (1,11H.) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-8) Mill Rd, HF TA039 Field Date: 04/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubru m Red maple 10 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Pinus' strobus White pine 30 0.18 T 3 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T 11 Betula lutea Yellow birch 1 0.50 T 2 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 2 0.00 S 0 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 3 0.82 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 3 0.50 S 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 50 0.82 S 2 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 15 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia. Meadowsweet 8 0.50 S 0 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 6 1.00 S 1 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 1 1.00 S 1 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 1 0.50 S 0 Salix sp. Willow 2 0.82 S 1 Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Vitis sp. Grapevine I S 3 Rubus idaeus Red raspberry 1 0.00 B 3 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 4 0.82 H 0 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 2 1.00 H 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 5 1.00 H 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 15 1.00 H 0 Carex sp.(A) A Sedge 8 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 2 1.00 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 2 1.00 H, 3 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 1 1.00 H 0 Epilobium coloratum Purple willowweed 1 1.00 H 1 WSI: 0.713 WFV: 0.440 BOG: 0.005 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.03 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.04 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.10 NARROW: 0.08 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 48.0 6 WQual 49.0 2 Hydro 56.5 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 30.1 8 Recr 36.9 4 Flood 61.7 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi 19.6 10 Educ 53.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.50 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA040 PLACE: (Photo 5-8) Mill Rd, HF FL DATe 05/29/86 GS&ABUN 20: SPHAGN10 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 BETPOP 2 GS&ABUN 21: IRIVER 2 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 ACERUB35 GS&ABUN 22: OSMREG 4 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTR 5 GS&ABUN 23: OSMCIN 5 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 SALIX 1 GS&ABUN 24: RANUNC 1 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 BETLUT 1 GS&ABUN 25: CAREX 3 GS&ABUN 6 CORSTO 2 GS&ABUN 26: EQUISE 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ALNRUG 4 GS&ABUN 27: IMPCAP 5 WSI: 0.770 GS&ABUN 8 sALIX 2 GS&ABUN 28: CALPAL I WFV: 0.390 GS&ABUN 9 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 29: CARSTR 7 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: fRAAME I GS&ABUN 30: ONOSEN15 NO. of species:' 30 GS&ABUN 11: VIBREC 5 INVestigator : HCS Prime : GS&ABUN 12: uLMAME 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.101 GS&ABUN 13: RHURAD 3 SPec ELem (ADEPHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 154 GS&ABUN 14: ILEVER20 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: RIBES 2 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.286 GS&ABUN 16: LONICE 1 VEGeta lntersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.357 GS&ABUN 17: VIBCAS 3 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.357 GS&ABUN 18: pINSTR 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): C Bog 0.065 GS&ABUN 19: CORAMO 4 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA040 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*,,' Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 47 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 129 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 46 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :H CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH. North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-8) Mill Rd, HF TA040 Field Date: 05/29/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value, Betula populifolia Grey birch 2 0.50 T 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 35 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 5 0.18 T 3 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 T 1 Betula lutea Yellow birch 1 0.50 T 2 Cornus stolonifera. Red-osier dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 4 1.00 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 2 0.82 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Fraxinus americana White ash 1 0.50 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 5 0.82 S 1 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 3 0.82 S 2 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 20 1.00 S 1 Ribes sp. Gooseberry 2 S 1 Lonicera sp. Honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 0 Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 3 0.82 S 1 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 S 3 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 4 0.82 S 3 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 10 1.00 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 2 1.00 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 4 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 5 0.82 H 0 Ranunculus sp. Buttercup I H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 3 1.00 H 3 Equisetum sp. Horsetail 2 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 5 0.82 H 0 Caltha palustris Marsh marigold 1 1.00 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 7 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 15 , 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.769 WFV: 0.389 BOG: 0.064 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.07 BUSHY: 0.25 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.04 BROADL: 0.16 NARROW: 0.07 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ----------------------- 7 ------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 48.8 6 WQual 50.0 2 Hydro 59.2 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 33.9 8 Recr 36.9 4 Flood 65.6 9 Aest 43.4 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 53.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.10 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA045 PLACE: (Photo 4-10 ,5-10) Taylor River, NE of Rt88, HA HF FL DATe 04/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: ONDSEN17 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB20 GS&ABUN 21: SOLIDA 6 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR19 GS&ABUN 22: ASTER- 7 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 3 GS&ABUN 23: SPHAGN 9 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 FRAAME 1 GS&ABUN 24: CAREX 11 Veg-Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 RHUVER 2 GS&ABUN 25: JUNEFF 4 GS&ABUN 6 pINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 26: SYMFOE 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 27: POa 14 WSI: 0.751 GS&ABUN 8 ROSPAL 2 GS&ABUN 28: LYTSAL 2 WFV: 0.378 GS&ABUN 9 SPITOM 1 GS&ABUN 29: IRIVER 1 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 30: EUPMAC I NO. of species@' 30 GS&ABUN 11: VIBREC 9 INVestigator GS Prime P GS&ABUN 12: ILEVER 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.030 GS&ABUN 13: SPILAT 9 SPec ELem (ADEPHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 197 GS&ABUN 14: VACCOR 6 CLaSs Richn (1-5) : 5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: CORAMO 2 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.218 GS&ABUN 16: RHURAD 9 VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.348 GS&ABUN 17: RUBHIS 5 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.434 GS&ABUN 18: CARSTR 8 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.046 GS&ABUN 19: TYPLAT 2 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA045 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HA HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :M Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :H DEPTH (SD or blank) :D Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 197 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 38 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 510 loc SCARCity (LMH) :H wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):4 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :P SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :P SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) :P HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) :E TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 4-10,5-10) Taylor River, NE of Rt88, HA HF TA045 Field Date: 04/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubru m Red maple 20 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 19 0.18 T 3 Ulmus* americana American elm 3 0.82 T 1 Fraxinus americana White ash 1 0.50 T 'Ili Rhus vernix Poison sumac 2 1.00 S 2 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 2 1.00 S 1 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 1 0.50 S 0 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 9 0.82 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 5 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 9 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 6 0.82 S 2 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 9 0.82 S 2 Rubus hispidus Trailing bramble 5 0.50 B 3 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 8 1.00 H 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 17 1.00 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 6 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 7 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 9 1.00 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 11 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 4 1.00 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 1 1.00 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 14 H 1 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 2 1.00 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 1 1.00 H 0 Eupatorium maculatum Spotted joe pye weed 1 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.751 WFV: 0.378 BOG: 0.045 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.19 COMPACT: 0.05 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.02 BROADL: 0.09 NARROW: 0.19 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 77.5 6 WQual 74.5 2 Hydro 76.3 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 54.7 8 Recr 53.4 4 Flood 68.6 9 Aest 49.2 5 ShoLi 35.1 10 Educ 76.1 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 9.20 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA077 PLACE: (Photo 5-8) Taylor River, N of Drinkwater Rd, HF FL DATe 04/08/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB 5 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME 3 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 SALNIG 3 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 sALIX 4 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 CORSTO 4 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ALNRUG15 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.929 GS&ABUN 8 LONMOR 2 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.430 GS&ABUN 9 TYPLAT30 GS&ABUN 29: Pere. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: CAREX 35 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:. 13 GS&ABUN 11: CARSTR10 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: JUNEFF10 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.000 GS&ABUN 13: JUNCUSIO SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 136 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.081 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.221 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.699 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): A Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY NPRU Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA077 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*/O' Bord OW (NLMH) :M Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 595 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, Riv er Other SOil 647 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 29 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL aces (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):T PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau. Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-8) Taylor River, N of Drinkwater Rd, HF TA077 Field Date: 04/08/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 3 0.82 T 1 Salix nigra Black willow 3 1.00 T 1 Salix sp. Willow 4 0.82 S 11 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood 4 0.82 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 15 1.00 S 1 Lonicera morrowi Morrow,'s honeysuckle 2 0.00 S 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 30 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 35 1.00 H 3 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 10 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 10 1.00 H 0 Juncus sp. Rush 10 H 0 WSI: 0.928 WFV: 0.430 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 .SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.06 BUSHY: 0.15 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.22 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.47 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NPRU WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 82.9 6 WQual 62.7 2 Hvdro 68.4 7 Econ 65.2 3 GrWat 37.7 8 Recr 52.0 4 Flood 57.8 9 Aest 55.0 5 ShoLi 18.6 10 Educ 71.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 7.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA078 PLACE: (Photo 5-8) Taylor River, N of Drinkwater Rd, HF FL DATe 04/08/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB 6 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 JUNVIR 1 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 POPTRE 1 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 SALNIG 2 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'LONMOR 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.934 GS&ABUN 8 ALNRUG18 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.506 GS&ABUN 9 CORAMO 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VACCOR 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 18 GS&ABUN 11: VIBREC 1 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: KALANG 1 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.002 GS&ABUN 13: pINSTR 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 210 GS&ABUN 14: sALIX 5 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: CARSTR40 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.057 GS&ABUN 16: CAREX 50 VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.176 GS&ABUN 17: TYPLAT70 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.767 GS&ABUN 18: LYTSAL 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): A Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY NPRU Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA078 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :H Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) -Dom SOil type (int) 595 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 66 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 29 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) :E HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) :E TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-8) Taylor River, N of Drinkwater Rd, HF TA078 Field Date: 04/08/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 6 0.50 T 3 Finus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T 3 Juniperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T 1 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 1 0.00 T I-) Salix nigra Black willow 2 1.00 T 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 1 0.00 S I Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 18 1.00 S I Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 2 0.82 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 1 0.82 S 1 Kalmia angustifolia Sheep laurel 1 0.50 S 0 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 5 0.82 S 1 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 40 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 50 1.00 H 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 70 1.00 H 1 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 1 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.933 WFV: 0.505 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.05 BUSHY: 0.11 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.33 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.42 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NPRU WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 86.0 6 WQual 70.5 2 Hydro 78.9 7 Econ 65.2 3 GrWat 56.6 8 Reer 43.8 4 Flood 63.7 9 Aest 50.7 5 ShoLi 37.9 10 Educ 66.6 ------- ------ -- --- ------- --------- --- ----- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 8.60 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA079 PLACE: (Photo 6-4) Between Drinkwater Rd & Cock Hill Rd, HF FL DATe 04/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 FRAPEN 5 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 6 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 5 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ACERUB10 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ALNRUG25 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 sALIX 15 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 ILEVER 3 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.768 GS&ABUN 8 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.401 GS&ABUN 9 LONMOR 3 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. FooA: H GS&ABUN 10: TYPLAT 4 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species@ 11 GS&ABUN 11: CAREX 5 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.017 GS&ABUN 13: SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 86 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees 0.302 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0'* 593 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.105 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): A Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY NPRU Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA079 OUTIet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :M Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 595 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 647 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 29 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 67 loc SCARCity (LMH) :11 wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Pam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):T PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-4) Between Drinkwater Rd & Cock Hill Rd, HF TA079 Field Date: 04/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Fraxinus p. subintegerrima Green ash 5 0.82 T 1 Pinus strobus White pine 6 0.18 T 3 jlmus americana. American elm 5 0.82 T 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 10 0.50 T Alnus rugosa. Speckled alder 25 1.00 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 15 0.82 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 3 1.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 3 0.00 S 1 Typha-latifolia Cattail 4 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 5 1.00 H 3 WSI: 0.768 WFV: 0.401 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.23 BUSHY: 0.36 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.04 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.05 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NPRU WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 76.7 6 WQual 64.7 2 Hydro 69.7 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 39.6 8 Recr 42.4 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 40.5 5 ShoLi 31.0 10 Educ 58.7 ------- ------ -- --- ------- --------- --- ----- AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 7.10 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA080 PLACE: (Photo 6-4) Taylor River, E of Kings Rd, HF FL DATe 04/04/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 PINSTR10 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ACERUB25 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 SALIX 13 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ULMAME10 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ALNRUG20 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 sALIX 15 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'CORAM010 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.774 GS&ABUN 8 VIBCAS10 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.448 GS&ABUN 9 RITURAD 5 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VIBREC10 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species; 13 GS&ABUN 11: TYPLAT10 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: CAREX 6 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.000 GS&ABUN 13: CARSTR 6 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 150 GS&ABUN 14: CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.387 GS&ABUN 16: VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.467 GS&ABUN 17: Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.147 GS&ABUN 18: Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): C Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY NPRUV Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA080 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 134 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 595 Lake or Combin. :R Dom Surround Soil 43 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 29 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rve HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF H'ampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-4) Taylor River, E of Kings Rd, HF TA080 Field Date: 04/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Pinus strobus White pine 10 0.18 T 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 25 0.50 T 3 Salix sp. Willow 13 0.82 T -11 Ulmus americana American elm 10 0.82 T j Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 20 1.00 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 15 0.82 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 10 0.82 S 3 Viburnum cassinoides Northern wild raisin 10 0.82 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 5 0.82 S 2 'Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 10 0.82 S 1 Typha latifolia Cattail 10 1.00 H 1 Carex sp. Sedge 6 1.00 H 3 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 6 1.00 H 3 WSI: 0.774 WFV: 0.448 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.10 BUSHY: 0.33 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.06 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.08 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NPRUV WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------- ---------------- ------------------------------ 1 Biol 68.9 6 WQual 60.7 2 Hydro 63.1 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 54.7 8 Recr 42.4 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 31.8 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 53.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA082 PLACE: (Photo 5-8) New Rd, N of Drinkwater Rd, HF FL DATe 04/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN I ACERUB40 GS&ABUNI 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME12 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 PINSTR 5 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 BETLUT 2 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 ALNRUG18 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 LONMOR 1 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 aCERUB15 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.630 GS&ABUN 8 ROSPAL 3 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.464 GS&ABUN 9 CORAM010 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: sALIX 8 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of speciesL 18 GS&ABUN 11: SPILAT 5 INVestigator ASG Prime : I GS&ABUN 12: pINSTR 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.010 GS&ABUN 13: VIBREC 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 147 GS&ABUN 14:- ROSMUL10 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SOLIDA 3 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.401 GS&ABUN 16: ONOSEN 7 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.497 GS&ABUN 17: CALCAN 4 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.102 GS&ABUN 18: JUNEFF 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA082 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 510 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 40 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr-Soil2 43 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):T THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GIAI Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-8) New Rd, N of Dri:hkwater Rd, HF TA082 Field Date: 04/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 40 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 12 0.82 T 1 Pinus strobus White pine 5 0.18 T @3 Betula lutea Yellow birch 2 0.50 T 2 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 18 1.00 S 1 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 1 0.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 S 3 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 3 1.00 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 10 0.82 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 8 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 5 0.50 S 0 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 1 0.82 S 1 Rosa multiflora Multiflora rose 10 0.00 S 1 .Solidago sp. Goldenrod 3 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 7 1.00 H 0 Calamagrostis canadensis Bluejoint grass 4 1.00 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 1 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.629 WFV: 0.464 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.17 BUSHY: 0.22 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.04 NARROW: 0.03 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 44.9 6 WQual 49.0 2 Hydro 56.5 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 33.9 8 Recr 36.9 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 39.1 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 46.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.90 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIEIJD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA084 PLACE: (Photo 5-6) Taylor River, HF Town Forest, HF FL DATe 04/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: CAREX 6 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 POPTRE 3 GS&ABUN 21: ONOSEN15 w6tl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ACERUB25 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 BETLUT 1 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ULMAME12 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 ALNRUG25 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'aCERUB15 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.828 GS&ABUN 8 VIBREC10 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.345 GS&ABUN 9 CORAMO 2 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: tSUCAN 1 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 21 GS&ABUN 11: RHURAD 5 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT10 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.002 GS&ABUN 13: pINSTR 1 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 216 GS&ABUN 14: SPHAGN30 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: TYPLAT34 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.199 GS&ABUN 16: COPGRO 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.319 GS&ABUN 17: LYTSAL 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.481 GS&ABUN 18: ASTER 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): B Bog 0.139 GS&ABUN 19: CARSTR15 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA084 OLJTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF PI/0 Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :H DEPTH (SD or blank) :S Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 134 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 40 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 38 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :P SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :P SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook I Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-6) Taylor River, HF Town Forest, HF TA084 Field Date: 04/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 3 0.00 T 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 25 0.50 T 3 Betula lutea Yellow birch 1 0.50 T 2 Ulmus americana American elm 12 0.82 T 11 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 25 1.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 10 0.82 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 5 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 10 0.50 S 0 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 30 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 34 1.00 H 1 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 2 0.82 H 0 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 1 1.00 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 1 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 15 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 6 1.00 H 3 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 15 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0 .827 WFV: 0.344 BOG: 0.138 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.07 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.04 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.16 BROADL: 0.07 NARROW: 0.09 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 - ---- ---- ------------- - ----- ---- ------------- 1 Biol 72.8 6 WQual 72.5 2 Hydro 73.6 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 49.0 8 Recr 45.2 4 Flood 68.6 9 Aest 36.2 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 66.6 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 8.10 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA085 PLACE: (Photo 5-6) New Rd, S of Drinkwater Rd, HF FL DATe 04/03/86 GS&ABUN 20: Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB10 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 JUNVIR I GS&ABUN.23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ALNRUG40 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CORAMO 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 MYRPEN 2 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 VIBRE C 1 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.854 GS&ABUN 8 pINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.252 GS&ABUN 9 SPILAT10 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Fooo: M GS&ABUN 10: ROSPAL15 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 18 GS&ABUN 11: SAMCAN 1 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: SPITOM 2 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.077 GS&ABUN 13: ILEVER 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: ill GS&ABUN 14: sALIX 3 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: RHUVER 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 0.108 GS&ABUN 16: TYPLAT 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.712 GS&ABUN 17: ONOSEN16 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.180 GS&ABUN 18: TYPLAT 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA085 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 134 Lake or.Combin. :N Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 47 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :L LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):6 RIPArian conn (YN) :N INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :A CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye RA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L SUMMARY Location: (Photo 5-6) New Rd, S of Drinkwater Rd, HF TA085 Field Date: 04/03/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 10 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 T 3 Ju'niperus virginiana Red cedar 1 0.18 T Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 40 1.00 S Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 2 0.50 S 2 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 1 0.82 S 1 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 10 0.50 S 0 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 15 1.00 S 1 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 2 0.50 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 2 1.00 S 1 Salix sp. Willow 3 0.82 S 1 Rhus vernix Poison sumac 1 1.00 S 2 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 16 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1.00 H 1 WSI: 0.854 WFV: 0.252 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.018 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.54 COMPACT: 0.12 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.03 BROADL: 0.14 NARROW: 0.00 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ---------------- ------------- ------------------------------ 1 Biol 62.0 6 WQual 56.8 2 Hydro 27.6 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 32.0 8 Recr 31.5 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 40.5 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 58.7 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.40 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA088 PLACE: (Photo 5-6) S of Lamprey Rd, HF FL DATe 06/30/86 GS&ABUN 20: SOLIDA 5 Veg DENsity (HML) H GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB15 GS&ABUN 21: LYSTER 6 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 4 GS&ABUN 22: JUNEFF 4 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 TSUCAN 2 GS&ABUN 23: GLYSTR 3 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ULMAME 2 GS&ABUN 24: CARSTR 2 Veg.Spec. Richness: H GS&ABUN 5 SALIX 1 GS&ABUN 25: SOLIDA 2 GS&ABUN 6 uLMAME 2 GS&ABUN 26: OSMCIN 2 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'tSUCAN 3 GS&ABUN 27: TYPLAT 2 WSI: 0.796 GS&ABUN 8 ALNRUG22 GS&ABUN 28: MAICAN 3 WFV: 0.232 GS&ABUN 9 RHAFRA 2 GS&ABUN 29: POa 40 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: RHURAD 4 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species. 29 GS&ABUN 11: SPILAT11 INVestigator GS 'Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: ROSPAL 8 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.093 GS&ABUN 13: VIBREC 6 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 220 GS&ABUN 14: ONOSEN12 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: CAREX 14 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.109 GS&ABUN 16: EQUFLU 2 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.264 GS&ABUN 17: EQUARV 6 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.627 GS&ABUN 18: IMPCAP30 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: ASTER 5 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA088 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 134 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 38 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 37 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):4 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 5-6) S of Lamprey Rd, HF TA088 Field Date: 06/30/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 4 0.18 T 3 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 2 0.50 T @1 Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.82 T Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 T 1 Ulmus americana American elm 2 0.82 S 1 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 3 0.50 S I Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 22 1.00 S 1 Rhamnus frangula Europ. buckthorn 2 0.50 S 0 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 4 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 11 0.50 S 0 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 8 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 6 0.82 S 1 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 12 1.00 H 0 Carex sp. Sedge 14 1.00 H 3 Equisetum fluviatile River horsetail 2 1.00 H 0 Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 6 0.50 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 30 0.82 H 0 Aster sp. Asters 5 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 5 H 0 Lysimachia terrestris Swamp candles 6 1.00 H 0 Juncus effusus Soft rush 4 1.00 H 0 Glyceria striata Fowl-meadow grass 3 1.00 H 1 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 2 1.00 H 3 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 2 0.82 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 2 1* 00 H 1 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 3 0.00 H 0 Poaceae Grasses 40 H 1 WSI: 0.796 WFV: 0.231 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.02 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.05 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.14 BROADL: 0.06 NARROW: 0.35 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 65.1 6 WQual 57.8 2 Hydro 56.5 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 54.7 8 Recr 34.2 4 Flood 62.7 9 Aest 40.5 5 ShoLi 19.6 10 Educ 66.6 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.70 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA090 PLACE: (Photo 6-4) N of Drinkwater Rd, W of Kings Rd, HF FL DATe 04/15/86 GS&ABUN 20: SPHAGN25 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB25 GS&ABUN 21: ONOSEN20 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 5 GS&ABUN 22: IMPCAP10 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 5 GS&ABUN 23: CARSTR10 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 SALNIG 4 GS&ABUN 24: CAREX 10 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 CAROVA 1 GS&ABUN 25: JUNEFF10 GS&ABUN 6 PRUPEN I GS&ABUN 26: COPGRO 5 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'POPTRE 2 GS&ABUN 27: SYMFOE 5 WSI: 0.836 GS&ABUN 8 aCERUB 1 GS&ABUN 28: CALPAL 1 WFV: 0.325 GS&ABUN 9 sALIX 5 GS&ABUN 29: TYPLAT20 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: ALNRUG25 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 29 GS&ABUN 11: ILEVER 4 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: VIBREC 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 6 Aesthetic: 0.030 GS&ABUN 13: CORAMO 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 265 GS&ABUN 14: RHURAD50 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SPILAT10 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.162 GS&ABUN 16: VACCOR 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.398 GS&ABUN 17: pINSTR 1 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.440 GS&ABUN 18: SAMCAN 1 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.094 GS&ABUN 19: RUBIDA I Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SO IL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA090 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P'/1, Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 33 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 134 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 32 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 510 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 66 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :E SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-4) N of Drinkwater Rd, W of Kings Rd, HF TA090 Field Date: 04/25/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 25 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 5 0.18 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 5 0.82 T 1 Salix nigra Black willow 4 1.00 T 1 Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 1 0.18 T 2 Prunus pensylvanica Bird cherry 1 0.00 T 3 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 2 0.00 T 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 1 0.50 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 5 0.82 S 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 25 1.00 S 1 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 4 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 5 0.82 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 50 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 10 0.50 S 0 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S 2 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 S 3 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Rubus idaeus Red raspberry 1 0.00 B 3 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 25 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 20 1.00 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 10 0.82 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 10 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 10 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 10 1.00 H 0 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread- 5 0.82 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 5 1.00 H 0 Caltha palustris Marsh marigold 1 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 20 1.00 H 1 WSI: 0.835 WFV: 0.325 BOG: 0.094 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.02 BUSHY: 0.14 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.11 BROADL: 0.11 NARROW: 0.11 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shrub Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 51.9 6 WQual 60.7 2 Hydro 59.2 7 Econ 56.5 3 GrWat 37.7 8 Recr 30.1 4 Flood 64.7 9 Aest 36.2 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 46.0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.20 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA092 PLACE: (Photo 6-4) Taylor River, between Osgood Rd & Rt88, HF FL DATe 04/22/86 GS&ABUN 20: JUNCUS 2 Veg DENsity (HML) : M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB 6 GS&ABUN 21: wetl JUXtapos(HML):' H GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR 1 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 SALIX 1 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 ALNRUG45 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 sALIX 15 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 SPILATIO GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'VIBREC 5 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.956 GS&ABUN 8 CORSTO 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.451 GS&ABUN 9 pRUPEN 1 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: ILEVER 5 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species:, 20 GS&ABUN 11: VACCOR 1 INVestigator ASG Prime : P GS&ABUN 12: TYPLAT70 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.009 GS&ABUN 13: CARSTR70 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 327 GS&ABUN 14: CAREX 70 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :5 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: PHRCOM 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.024 GS&ABUN 16: LYTSAL I VEGeta Intersp (HML) H Shrubs: 0.254 GS&ABUN 17: SOLIDA 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.722 GS&ABUN 18: SPHAGN10 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): B Bog 0.031 GS&ABUN 19: ONOSEN10 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA092 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P1. Bord OW (NLMH) :H Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :H DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 134 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 313 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 538 loc SCARCity (LMH) :M wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):4 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :P SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) :P SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) :P HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW` Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) :E TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-4) Taylor River, between Osgood Rd & Rt88, HF TA092 Field Date: 04/22/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 6 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 1 0.18 T 3 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 T 1 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 45 1.00 S Salix sp. Willow 15 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 10 0.50 S 0 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 5 0.82 S 1 Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Prunus pensylvanica Bird cherry 1 0.00 S 3 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 5 1.00 S 1 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 1 0.82 S 2 Typha latifolia Cattail 70 1.00 H 1 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 70 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 70 1.00 H 3 Phragmites communis Reed 1 0.82 H 0 Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife 1 1.00 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 10 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 10 1.00 H 0 Juncus sp. Rush 2 H 0 WSI: 0.956 WFV: 0.451 BOG: 0.030 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.17 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.22 BROADL: 0.03 NARROW: 0.43 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ 1 Biol 86.8 6 WQual 74.5 2 Hydro 81.5 7 Econ 82.6 3 GrWat 73.5 8 Recr 54.7 4 Flood 64.7 9 Aest 50.7 5 ShoLi 37.9 10 Educ 66-6 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 9.50 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA093 PLACE: (Photo 6-6) N of Osgood Rd, HF FL DATe : 04/22/86 GS&ABUN 20: ONOSEN30 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 : ACERUB10 GS&ABUN 21: TYPLAT80 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 : PINSTR 3 GS&ABUN 22: w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 : CAROVA 1 GS&ABUN 23: Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 : tSUCAN I GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 : pRUPEN 1 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 : ALNRUG30 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 : aCERUB40 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.887 GS&ABUN 8': sALIX 10 GS&ABUN 28: VFV: 0.446 GS&ABUN 9 : VIBREC15 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: CORSTO 1 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of speciesi' 21 GS&ABUN 11: ILEVER 2 INVestigator ASG Prime P GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT10 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.003 GS&ABUN 13: SPITOM 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 376 GS&ABUN 14: RUBALL 1 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: RUBIDA 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.037 GS&ABUN 16: CARSTR60 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.301 GS&ABUN 17: CAREX 60 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.662 GS&ABUN 18: SYMFOE 3 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): E Bog 0.040 GS&ABUN 19: SPHAGN15 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CMNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA093 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P*,'. Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S PETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 395 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 313 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 26 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam, Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :E SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GIAI Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-6) N of Osgood Rd, HF TA093 Field Date: 04/22/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 10 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 3 0.18 T 3 Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 1 0.18 T 2 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 S 1-1 Prunus pensylvanica Bird cherry 1 0.00 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 30 1.00 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 40 0.50 S 3 Salix sp. Willow 10 0.82 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 15 0.82 S 1 Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood 1 0.82 S 3 Ilex verticillata. Winterberry 2 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 10 0.50 S 0 Spiraea tomentosa Steeplebush 2 0.50 S 0 Rubus allegheniensis Blackberry 1 0.00 B 3 Rubus idaeus Red raspberry 1 0.00 B 3 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 60 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 60 1.00 H 3 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 3 1.00 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 15 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H. 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 80 1.00 H 1 WSI: 0.887 WFV: 0.446 BOG: 0.039 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.13 BUSHY: 0.12 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.21 BROADL: 0.08 NARROW: 0.31 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CMNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 60.4 6 WQual 64.7 2 Hydro 59.2 7 Econ 65.2 3 GrWat 50.9 8 Recr 43.8 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 46.3 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 61.9 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 6.60 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA094 PLACE: (Photo 7-4) The Cove, W of Rt88, HF F1 DATe 04/22/86 GS&ABUN 20: SOLIDA 2 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB15 GS&ABUN 21: ONOSEN20 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ULMAME 1 GS&ABUN 22: IRIVER 4 W. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 TSUCAN 2 GS&ABUN 23: SYMFOE 2 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 PINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 24: Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 aCERUB 5 GS&ABUN 25: GS&ABUN 6 ALNRUG10 GS&ABUN 26: ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS:. GS&ABUN 7 "CORAMO 2 GS&ABUN 27: WSI: 0.944 GS&ABUN 8 tSUCAN 1 GS&ABUN 28: WFV: 0.364 GS&AtUN 9 bETLUT 1 GS&ABUN 29: Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: pINSTR 2 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species: 23 GS&ABUN 11: TYPLAT70 INVestigator ASG Prime P GS&ABUN 12: CALCAN40 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 3 Aesthetic: 0.012 GS&ABUN 13: CARSTR50 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 333 GS&ABUN 14: CAREX 50 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :4 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: JUNEFF10 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): C Trees : 0.060 GS&ABUN 16: JUNCUS10 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.063 GS&ABUN 17: SPRAGN15 Surr. HABitat (123) 1 Herbs 0.877 GS&ABUN 18: SCICYP 7 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): A Bog 0.045 GS&ABUN 19: COPGRO12 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY MNPRUW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA094 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NUIH) :L Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) :L Wetl SIZe (LMH) :H DEPTH (SD or blank) :S Dom SOil type (int) 197 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 395 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 313 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 26 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :H wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :M or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):4 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :P CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) :P SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):O PERmeabil (LMH):M INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):O THIckness (LMH):M INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :W GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH). :H OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau. Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 7-4) The Cove, W of Rt88, HF TA094 Field Date: 04/22/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 15 0.50 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 1 0.82 T 1 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 2 0.50 T 1 Pinus strobus White pine 2 0.18 T '3 Acer rubrum Red maple 5 0.50 S 3 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 10 1.00 S 1 Cornus amomum, Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Tsuga canadensis Hemlock 1 0.50 S 1 Betula lutea Yellow birch 1 0.50 S 2 inus strobus White pine 2 0.18 S 3 Typha latifolia Cattail 70 1.00 H 1 Calamagrostis canadensis Bluejoint grass 40 1.00 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 50 1.00 H 3 Carex sp. Sedge 50 1.00 H 3 Juncus effusus Soft rush 10 1.00 H 0 Juncus sp. Rush 10 H 0 Sphagnum sp. Sphagnum moss 15 1.00 H 0 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 7 1.00 H 3 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 12 0.82 H 0 Solidago sp. Goldenrod 2 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 20 1.00 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 4 1.00 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 2 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.943 WFV: 0.364 BOG: 0.045. SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.02 BUSHY: 0.03 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.22 BROADL: 0.10 NARROW: 0.50 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:MNPRUW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Shallow Fresh Marsh R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 76.7 6 WQual 66.6 2 Hydro 64.4 7 Econ 82.6 3 GrWat 79.2 8 Recr 54.7 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 59.4 5 ShoLi 8.27 10 Educ 71.4 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 8.60 Candidate for prime Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA096 PLACE: (Photo 6-6) S of Rt88, N of Munt Hill, HF FL DATe 06/09/86 GS&ABUN 20: ONOSEN30 Veg DENsity (HML) H GS&ABUN 1 PINSTR15 GS&ABUN 21: TYPLAT10 wetl JUXtapos(HML): H GS&ABUN 2 ACERUB40 GS&ABUN 22: GERMAC 2 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 SALIX I GS&ABUN 23: SYMFOE 3 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 pRUSER 1 GS&ABUN 24: CALCAN 3 Veg.Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 VACCOR 3 GS&ABUN 25: EUPMAC 1 GS&ABUN 6 uLMAME 3 GS&ABUN 26: CARSTR10 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 aCERUB 7 GS&ABUN 27: DRYTHE 3 WSI: 0.737 GS&ABUN 8 pINSTR 5 GS&ABUN 28: CALPAL 1 WFV: 0.396 GS&ABUN 9 VIBREC10' GS&ABUN 29: OSMREG 1 Perc. Wild. Food: M GS&ABUN 10: CORAMO 8 GS&ABUN 30: IRIVER 1 NO. of species: . 30 GS&ABUN 11: ROSPAL 3 INVestigator GS Prime GS&ABUN 12: SPILAT 7 Dom Wetl.Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.046 GS&ABUN 13: ALNRUG 8 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 216 GS&ABUN 14: RHURAD15 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: VIBCAS 8 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): B Trees : 10.259 1 GS&ABUN 16: ILEVER 5 VEGeta Intersp (HML) M Shrubs: 0.384 GS&ABUN 17: EQUPRA 2 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.356 GS&ABUN 18: IMPCAP 5 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: OSMCIN 5 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CNPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA096 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P% Bord OW (NLMH) :N Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 533 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :R Other Surr. Soill 14 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(I-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW` Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :E NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau. Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-6) S of Rt88, N of Munt Hill, HF TA096 Field Date: 06/09/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Pinus strobus White pine 15 0.18 T 3 Acer rubrum Red maple 40 0.50 T 3 Salix sp. Willow 1 0.82 T 1 Prunus serotina Black cherry 1 0.18 S Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 3 0.82 S 2 Ulmus americana American elm 3 0.82 S 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 7 0.50 S 3 Pinus strobus White pine 5 0.18 S 3 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 10 0.82 S I Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 8 0.82 S 3 Rosa palustris Marsh rose 3 1.00 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 7 0.50 S 0 Alnus rugosa Speckled alder 8 1.00 S 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 15 0.82 S 2 Viburnum cassinaides Northern wild raisin 8 0.82 S 1 Ile.x verticillata Winterberry 5 1.00 S 1 Equisetum pratense Meadow horsetail 2 0.82 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 5 0.82 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 5 0.82 H -0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 30 1.00 H 0 Typha latifolia Cattail 10 1.00 H 1 Geranium maculatum Wild cranesbill 2 0.18 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 3 1.00 H 0 Calamagrostis canadensis Bluejoint grass 3 1.00 H 0 Eupatorium maculatum Spotted joe pye weed 1 0.82 H 0 Carex stricta Tussock sedge 10 1.00 H 3 Dryopteris thelypteris Marsh fern 3 1.00 H 0 Caltha palustris Marsh marigold 1 1.00 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Iris versicolor Blue flag 1 1.00 H 0 WSI: 0.736 WFV: 0.395 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.07 BUSHY: 0.20 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.07 BROADL: 0.19 NARROW: 0.07 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F 11 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score I-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ I Biol 47.2 6 WQual 49.0 2 Hydro 51.3 7 Econ 73.9 3 GrWat 30.1 8 Recr 36.9 4 Flood 65.6 9 Aest 43.4 5 ShoLi 0.00 10 Educ 50.7 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 5.20 Copy of 'EVAL' datasheet: FIELD DATA & COMPUTATIONS ON ECOLOGICAL SUMMARY WID: TA097 PLACE: (Photo 6-8) Near Exeter/HF/HA town lines, HF FL DATe 05/13/86 GS&ABUN 20: RANUNC 2 Veg DENsity (HML) M GS&ABUN 1 ACERUB60 GS&ABUN 21: SYMFOE10 wetl JUXtapos(HML): M GS&ABUN 2 PINSTR10 GS&ABUN 22: ONOSEN25 w. level FLUCtu (Hi GS&ABUN 3 ULMAME 5 GS&ABUN 23: OSMCIN 3 Lo Vernal pool): L GS&ABUN 4 RHURAD20 GS&ABUN 24: OSMREG 1 Veg-Spec. Richness: M GS&ABUN 5 aCERUB10 GS&ABUN 25: MAICAN10 GS&ABUN 6 pINSTR 4 GS&ABUN 26: PTEAQU 1 ECOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONS: GS&ABUN 7 'pOPTRE 1 GS&ABUN 27: EQUSYL 2 WSI: 0.641 GS&ABUN 8 VACCOR 7 GS&ABUN 28: TRIBOR 1 WFV: 0.402 GS&ABUN 9 ALNRUG 8 GS&ABUN 29: COPGRO 2 Perc. Wild. Food: H GS&ABUN 10: VIBREC 8 GS&ABUN 30: NO. of species@' 29 GS&ABUN 11: SPILAT 5 INVestigator GS Prime : I GS&ABUN 12: ILEVER 5 Dom Wetl Class (0-11): 7 Aesthetic: 0.023 GS&ABUN 13: CORAMO 2 SPec ELem (ADEFHRSW ): Tot ABUN: 216 GS&ABUN 14: pRUSER 2 CLaSs Richn (1-5) :3 Conifer? N GS&ABUN 15: SAMCAN 1 SubTYpe Richn (ABCDE): D Trees : 0.347 GS&ABUN 16: GEUMAC 1 VEGeta Intersp (HML) L Shrubs: 0.338 GS&ABUN 17: ANEQUI 3 Surr. HABitat (123) 2 Herbs 0.315 GS&ABUN 18: VERVIR 2 Cover DISpers.(ABCDE): D Bog 0.000 GS&ABUN 19: IMPCAP 5 Percent Open W (LMHV): L SBTY CPRUVW Copy of 'MAPR' datasheet: SOIL, MAP & PHOTO DATA Wet ID :TA097 OUTlet2 (APE) 2 letter TOWN codes*:HF P" Bord. OW (NLMH) :L /0 Topo CONfig (CSVH) :S FETch (LH or blank) Wetl SIZe (LMH) :M DEPTH (SD or blank) Dom SOil type (int) 538 HYdr CoN (None, Stream, River Other SOil 33 Lake or Combin. :S Dom Surround Soil 38 ACCeSs (Rd Wat Iso) :I Other Surr. Soill 32 POP'n density (LMH) :L Other Surr. Soi12 loc SCARCity (LMH) :L wetl GRAdient (LH) :L CROP (N Hay Fam Com):N Surr. SLOpe (LH) :H LEGAL accs (puB priV TOpo. POsit. (LMH) :H or Restricted) :V Dom Hydr Condit(1-6):5 RIPArian conn (YN) :Y INLetl (Abs Perrenial or Ephemeral :E CALCULATED FROM OTHER DATA AND SOIL: INL2 (APE) SurGeol Under wl(ALOT):L PERmeabil (LMH):L INL3 (APE) SurGeol Surround(ALOT):L THIckness (LMH):L INL4 (APE) HPOSition (Perch,W,A) :P GW Relat (DRC) :C INL5 (APE) TRAnsmissivity (LMH) :L OUTLetl (APE) :P NC New Castle RY Rye HA Hampton NH North Hampton HF Hampton Falls SE Seabrook Normandeau. Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 6-8) Near Exeter/HF/HA town lines, HF TA097 Field Date: 05/13/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Acer rubrum Red maple 60 0.50 T 3 Pinus strobus White pine 10 0.18 T 3 Ulmus americana American elm 5 0.82 T 1 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 20 0.82 S 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 10 0.50 S 3 Pinus strobus White pine 4 0.18 S 3 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 1 0.00 S 2 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry 7 0.82 S 2 Alnus rugosa . Speckled alder 8 1.00 S 1 Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood 8 0.82 S 1 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 5 0.50 S 0 Ilex verticillata Winterberry 5 1.00 S 1 Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 2 0.82 S 3 Prunus serotina Black cherry 2 0.18 S 3 Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 1 0.18 S 1 Geum macrophyllum Big-leaf avens 1 1.00 H 0 Anemone quinquefolia Wood anemone 3 0.00 H 0 Veratrum viride White hellebore 2 0.82 H 0 Impatiens capensis Jewelweed 5 0.82 H 0 Ranunculus sp. Buttercup 2 H 0 Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk cabbage 10 1.00 H 0 Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern 25 1.00 H 0 Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon fern 3 0.82 H 0 Osmunda regalis Royal fern 1 1.00 H 0 Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower 10 0.00 H 0 Pteridium aquilinum Bracken 1 0.18 H 0 Equisetum sylvaticum, Wood horsetail 2 0.82 H 0 Trientalis borealis Starflower 1 0.50 H 0 Coptis groenlandica Goldthread 2 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.640 WFV: 0.401 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.07 BUSHY: 0.14 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.03 BROADL: 0.19 NARROW: 0.01 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CPRUVW WATERSHED: Taylor River TYPE: Wooded Swamp R E S U L T S 0 F M 0 D E L C 0 M P U T A T 1 0 N S Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 Benefit Score 1-R-A-N-K-10 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 Biol 39.5 6 WQual 49.0 2 Hydro 61.8 7 Econ 60.8 3 GrWat 33.9 8 Recr 31.5 4 Flood 60.7 9 Aest 26.0 5 ShoLi 17.5 10 Educ 28.5 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE DECILE OF TEN MODELS: 4.00 4.3 OUTLINE OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS MODELS Model 1 Biological Function Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Dom Wet. Class 0Streamside 5 x 1 5 5 DWC 1Ow 5 x 0 0 0 2Deep Mar 5 x 4 20 20 3Shal Mar 5 x 5 25 25 4An Floodp 5 x 5 25 25 5Wet Meadow 5 x 2 10 10 6Shrub Sw 5 x 4 20 20 7N Decid For 5 x 2 10 10 7Y Conif For 5 x 4 20 20 8Bog 5 x 3 15 15 9Saltmarsh - - 10 Dune - - Number of Wetl. 5or more 4 x 5 20 16 Classes 4 4 x 4 16 12 CLSR 3 4 x 3 12 8 2 4 x 2 8 4 1 4 x 1 4 0 No. Wetl Subcl A 3 x 5 15 12 STYR B 3 x 4 12 9 C 3 x 3 9 6 D 3 x 2 6 3 E 3 x 1 3 0 Vegetative H 4 x 3 12 8 Interspersion M 4 x 2 8 4 VEGI L 4 x 1 4 0 Surrounding 1 3 x 3 9 6 Habitat 2 3 x 2 6 3 SHAB 3 3 x 1 3 0 Cover Disper- A 3 x 4 12 9 sion B 3 x 2 6 5 CDIS C 3 x 3 9 7 D 3 x 1 3 3 E 0 Vegetative Spec H 2 x 3 6 4 Richness M 2 x 2 4 2 VSR L 2 x 1 2 0 Proportion of H 1 x 3 3 2 Wildlife Food M 1 x 2 2 1 PWF L 1 x 1 1 0 (Biol Model 1, cont'd) Vegetative H 2 x 3 6 4 Density M 2 x 2 4 2 VDEN L 2 x 1 2 0 Wetland H 3 x 3 9 9 Juxtaposit. M 3 x 2 6 6 JUX L 3 x 0 0 0 Hydrologic W 2 x 4 8 6 Position A 2 x 3 6 4 HPOS P 2 x 1 2 0 Water level H 1 x 0 0 0 Fluctuation L 1 x 2 2 2 FLUC V 1 x 1 1 1 Hydrologic S 1 x 1 1 1 Connection R 1 x 2 2 2 HYCN L 1 x 3 3 3 C 1 x 4 4 4 N 1 x 0 0 0 Percent Wetl. L 4 x 1 4 4 Bordering OW M 4 x 2 8 8 PBOW H 4 x 3 12 12 N 4 x 0 0 0 Wetland Size H 5 x 3 15 10 WSIZ M 5 x 2 10 5 L 5 x 1 5 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 29 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 158 129 1.29 100 Model 2 Hydrologic Support Function Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Wetland Size High 4 x 3 12 8 WSIZ Moderate 4 x 2 8 4 Low 4 x 1 4 0 Topographic S I x 3 3 3 Configuration V 1 x 2 2 2 TCON H 1 x 1 1 1 C 1 x 0 0 0 Dominant Hydr- 1 5 x 1 5 5 ologic Cond. 2 5 x 2 10 10 DHC 3 5 x 3 15 15 4 5 x 4 20 20 5 5 x 5 25 25 6 5 x 0 0 0 Water level L 2 x 2 4 2 Fluctuation H 2 x 1 2 0 FLUC Outlet #1 P 4 x 2 8 8 OUTL1 E 4 x 1 4 4 A 4 x 0 0 0 Outlet #2 P 4 x 2 8 8 OUTL2 E 4 x 1 4 4 A 4 x 0 0 0 Inlet #1 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL1 E I x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Inlet #2 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL2 E 1 x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Inlet #3 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL3 E 1 x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Inlet #4 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL4 E 1 x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 (Hydrol. Support, Model 2, cont'd) Inlet #5 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL5 E 1 x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Percent Border- H 4 x 3 12 12 ing Open Water M 4 x 2 8 8 PBOW L 4 x 1 4 4 N 4 x 0 0 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 6 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 82 76 0.76 100 Model 3 Ground Water Function Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Surficial Outw 3 x 4 12 9 Geology (Und) Lake 3 x 3 9 6 SGU Alluv 3 x 2 6 3 Till 3 x 1 3 0 Thickness of L 4 Organics M or H then use PER THI Permeability of H 2 x 3 6 2 Organics M 2 x 2 4 1 PER L 2 x 1 2 0 Hydrologic W 5 x 4 20 10 Position A 5 x 1 5 0 HPOS P 5 x 2 10 0 Transmissivity H 4 x 3 12 8 of Aquifer M 4 x 2 8 4 TRA L 4 x 1 4 0 Inlet #1 P 1 x 3 3 2 INL1 E 1 x 2 2 1 A 1 x 1 1 0 Inlet #2 p 1 x 3 3 2 INL2 E I x 2 2 1 A 1 x 1 1 0 Inlet #3 p 1 x 3 3 2 INL3 E 1 x 2 2 1 A 1 x 1 1 0 Inlet #4 p I x 3 3 2 INL4 E 1 x 2 2 1 A 1 x 1 1 0 Inlet #5 p 1 x 3 3 2 INL5 E 1 x 2 2 1 A 1 x 1 1 0 (Model 3, Ground Water, cont'd) Outlet #1 A and 02=A 2 x 3 6 6 OUTL1 p 2 x 2 4 4 E 2 x 1 2 2 Outlet #2 A see above scores 0 0 OUT12 p see above scores 0 0 E see above scores 0 0 Wetland Size H 3 x 3 9 6 WSIZ M 3 x 2 6 3 L 3 x 1 3 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 24 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 80 53 0.53 100 Model 4 Storm and Flood water Storage Function Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Dom Wet. Class 0 2 x 1 2 0 DWC 1 2 x 1 2 0 2 2 x 2 4 2 3 2 x 4 8 6 4 2 x 4 8 6 5 2 x 3 6 4 6 2 x 5 10 8 7 2 x 4 8 6 8 2 x 3 6 4 9 10 - - Percent Open L 2 x 3 6 6 Water M 2 x 2 4 4 POW H 2 x 1 2 2 V 2 x 0 0 0 Vegetative H 4 x 3 12 8 Density M 4 x 2 8 4 VDEN L 4 x 1 4 0 Topographic Cor more 2 x 4 8 6 Configuration S 2 x 3 6 4 TCON V 2 x 2 4 2 H 2 x 1 2 0 Topographic H 3 x 3 9 6 Position M 3 x 2 6 3 TOPO L 3 x 1 3 0 Surficial Mat- Till 2 x 4 8 6 erial of Lake 2 x 3 6 4 Watershed Alluv 2 x 2 4 2 SGS Outw 2 x 1 2 0 Surficial Mat- Till 2 x 1 2 0 erial of Lake 2 x 2 4 2 Wetland banks Alluv 2 x 3 6 4 SGU Outw 2 x 4 8 6 Permeability of H 1 x 2 2 2 Organics M I x 1 1 1 PER L 1 x 0 0 0 (Model 4, Storm & Flood, cont'd) Dominant 6 5 x 6 30 25 Hydrologic 5 5 x 5 25 20 Condition 4 5 x 4 20 15 DHC 3 5 x 3 15 10 2 5 x 2 10 5 1 5 x 1 5 0 Connection to Y 4 x 2 8 4 Riparian Sys. N 4 x 1 4 0 RIPA Water level H 3 x 2 6 3 Fluctuation L 3 x 1 3 0 FLUC V 3 x ? ? 0 Inlet #1 P I x 2 2 2 INL1 E I x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Inlet #2 P I x 2 2 2 INL2 E 1 x 1 1 1 A I x 0 6 0 Inlet #3 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL3 E 1 x 1 1 1 A I x 0 0 0 Inlet #4 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL4 E 1 x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Inlet #5 P 1 x 2 2 2 INL5 E 1 x 1 1 1 A 1 x 0 0 0 Outlet #1 P 1 x 1 1 1 OUTL1 E 1 x 2 2 2 A 1 x 0 0 0 Outlet #2 P 1 x 1 1 1 OUTL2 E 1 x 2 2 2 A 1 x 0 0 0 Wetland Size H 4 x 3 12 8 WSIZ M 4 x 2 8 4 L 4 x 1 4 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 31 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 133 102 1.02 100 Model 5 Shoreline Protection Function Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model if PBOW = N value = 0 if PBOW = L value x 0.3 if PBOW = M value x 0.6 if PBOW = H value x 1.0 Veg. Density High 2 x 3 6 4 VDEN Moderate 2 x 2 4 2 Low 2 x 1 2 0 Dom Wet. Class 0 3 x 0 0 0 DWC 1 3 x 0 0 0 2 3 x 1 3 3 3 3 x 2 6 6 4 3 x 4 12 12 5 3 x 1 3 3 6 3 x 4 12 12 7 3 x 4 12 12 8 3 x 3 9 9 9 10 - - Surficial Mat. Till 1 x 2 2 1 under wetland O(S&G) 1 x 1 1 0 SGU L(Si) 1 x 4 4 3 Alluvium 1 x 3 3 2 Fetch H 4 x 2 8 8 FET L 4 x 1 4 4 (not a lake) 4 x 0 0 0 Depth of lake D 1 x 2 2 2 DEPTH S 1 x 1 1 1 (not a lake) I x 0 0 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 3 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 32 29 0.29 100 Model 6 Water Quality Maintenance Model Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Dom Wetland 0 4 x 1 4 4 Class 1 4 x 0 0 0 DWC 2 4 x 3 12 12 3 4 x 4 16 16 4 4 x 4 16 16 5 4 x 3 12 12 6 4 x 4 16 12 7 4 x 2 8 8 8 4 x 2 8 8 9 10 - - Percent Open L I x 3 3 3 Water M k 2 2 2 POW H x 1 1 1 V 1 x 0 0 0 Veg. Density High 3 x 3 9 6 VDEN Moderate 3 x 2 6 3 Low 3 x 1 3 0 Topographic C 3 x 4 12 9 Configuration S 3 x 3 9 6 TCON V 3 x 2 6 3 H 3 x 1 3 0 Topographic H 2 x 1 2 0 Position M 2 x 2 4 2 TOPO L 2 x 3 6 4 Permeability of H 1 x 1 1 1 Organics M 1 x 2 2 2 PER L 1 x 0 0 0 Dominant 6 4 x 6 24 20 Hydrologic 5 4 x 5 20 16 Condition 4 4 x 4 16 12 DHC 3 4 x 3 12 8 2 4 x 2 8 4 1 4 x 1 4 0 Connection to Y 2 x 2 4 2 Riparian sys N 2 x 1 2 0 RIPA (Model 6, Water Quality Function, cont'd) Inlet #1 p 2 x 2 4 4 INL1 E 12 x 1 2 2 A 2 x 0 0 0 Inlet #2 p 2 x 2 4 4 INL2 E 2 x 1 2 2 A 2 x 0 0 0 Inlet #3 p 2 x 2 4 4 INL3 E 2 x 1 2 2 A 2 x 0 0 0 Inlet #4 p 2 x 2 4 4 INL4 E 2 x 1 2 2 A 2 x 0 0 0 Inlet #5 p 2 x 2 4 4 INL5 E 2 x 1 2 2 A 2 x 0 0 0 Outlet #1 p 3 x 2 6 6 OUTLI E 3 x 1 3 3 A 3 x 0 0 0 Outlet #2 p 3 x 2 6 6 OUTL2 E 3 x 1 3 3 A 3 x 0 0 0 Wetland size H 4 x 3 12 8 WSIZ M 4 x 2 8 4 L 4 x 1 4 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 18 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 120 102 1.02 100 Model 7 Cultural and Economic Model Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Dom Wetland 0 4 x 0 0 0 Class 1 4 x 0 0 0 DWC 2 4 x 4 16 16 3 4 x 4 16 16 4 4 x 0 0 0 5 4 x 2 8 8 6 4 x 3 12 12 7 N 4 x 5 20 20 7 Y 4 x 6 24 24 8 4 x 3 12 12 9 10 - - Access R 3 x 3 9 6 ACCS w 3 x 2 6 3 1 3 x 1 3 0 Wetland size H 8 x 3 24 16 WSIZ M 8 x 2 16 8 L 8 x 1 8 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 11 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 57 46 0.46 100 Model 8 Recreational Function Model Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Dom Wetland 0 3 x 0 0 12 Class 1 3 x 0 0 20 DWC 2 3 x 6 18 20 3 3 x 5 15 12 4 3 x 0 0 0 5 3 x 0 0 5 6 3 x 2 6 5 7 N 3 x 2 6 10 7 Y 3 x 3 9 10 8 3 x 2 6 8 9 - 10 10 - 10 Percent Open L 3 x 1 3 0 Water M 3 x 2 6 3 POW H 3 x 3 9 6 V 3 x 0 0 9 Hydrological S 4 x 1 4 2 Connection R 4 x 2 8 8 HCON L 4 x 3 12 12 C 4 x 4 16 16 N 4 x 0 0 0 Access R 2 x 3 6 4 ACCS W 2 x 2 4 2 1 2 x 1 2 0 Wetland size H 4 x 3 12 16 WSIZ M 4 x 2 8 8 L 4 x 1 4 0 Legal Access B 2 x 2 4 2 LEGAL V 2 x 1 2 0 R 2 x 1 2 '0 Biological H 3 x 3 9 6 Value M 3 x 2 6 3 (from model 1) L 3 x 1 3 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 11 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 74 73 0.73 100 Model 9 Aesthetic Function Model Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Dom Wetland 0 4 x 0 0 0 12 Class 1 4 x 0 0 0 20 DWC 2 4 x 5 20 20 20 3 4 x 4 16 16 16 4 4 x 0 0 0 0 5 4 x 0 0 0 10 6 4 x 2 8 6 6 7 N 4 x 3 12 12 8 7 Y 4 x 3 12 12 12 8 4 x 5 20 20 20 9 10 - - Subclass A 3 x 4 12 9 Richness B 3 x 4 12 9 STYR C 3 x 3 9 6 D 3 x 2 6 3 E 3 x 1 3 0 Percent Open L 4 x 1 4 4 Water M 4 x 3 12 12 POW H 4 x 4 16 16 V 4 x 0 0 0 Access R 3 x 3 9 6 ACCS W 3 x 2 6 3 1 3 x 1 3 0 Local Scarcity H 3 x 3 9 6 SCARC M 3 x 2 6 3 L 3 x 1 3 0 BEAUTy value gt 0.2 12 gt 0.1 6 gt 0.01 3 it 0.01 0 MINIMUM TOTAL 9 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 66 69 0.69 100 Model 10 Education Function Model Element Condition Original Equivalent Modified model model Subclass A 3 x 4 12 9 Richness B 3 x 4 12 9 STYR C 3 x 3 9 6 D 3 x 2 6 3 E 3 x 1 3 0 Access R 4 x 3 12 8 ACCS w 4 x 2 8 4 1 4 x 1 4 0 Biol. value H 10 from FMC1 M 5 L 0 Dominant Wetl. 0 10 Class 1 5 DWC 2 10 3 10 4 0 5 3 6 5 7 N 5 7 Y 15 8 20 9 20 10 20 Local H 6 Scarcity M 3 SCARC L 0 Vegetative H 10 Species M 5 Richness L 0 VSR MINIMUM TOTAL 7 0 MAXIMUM TOTAL 24 63 0.63 100 5.0 APPENDIX: SALT MARSHES, DETAILED RESULTS 5.1 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS Assessment of the tidal marsh systems was based on infra-red photo interpretation and field surveys. This report presents a broad overview of conditions. More detailed work is necessary to document the more highly impacted tidal systems and to monitor changes that will occur if efforts are made to restore their hydrology. To assess the general health of a tidal marsh system, the following factors were considered: 1. Extent of panne and/or rotten spots present on the high marsh surface. 2. Presence of species indicative of high saline conditions, such as Sallcornia sp. and the short form of Spartina alterniflora on the high marsh. 3. Presence of species, such as Lythrum sal-icaria, Phragn7ites sp. and Typha sp. which indicate progression of the high marsh toward a freshwater tidal system. Also, species such as Phragmites, and to a lesser extent Typha, which often point to a man-made disturbance. 4. Presence of man-made restrictions, such as culverts, road and railroad beds, extensive mosquito ditching, stream blockages due to riprap and/or fell. 5. Presence of bedrock and/or glacial till islands in the high marsh, or other unique geological or topographical features. These areas provide an ecotonal situation which contributes to the diversity of wildlife on the marsh. 6. Presence of open areas of freshwater, adjacent to tidal marsh systems. These sites provide a diversity in habitat which increases the biological diversity of flora and fauna in the area. 7. Integrity of the border zone around the tidal marsh system. The border zone not only buffers the high marsh from human activities, but also provides a biologically rich habitat, due to its ecotonal nature. 8. Relative size of the tidal marsh and its proximity to other similar systems. 9. Development of salt marsh peat, which includes depth of soil, stage of decomposition, texture of underlying mineral soil materials and total salts in surface soil materials. For a description of salt marsh soils, see Section 3.2.3. Though a quantitive model was not used in the assessment of these tidal systems, each of the criteria above were assigned a value of high, medium or low for each marsh, from which were calculated a rating for the marsh's overall health. Section 5.2 presents these results, along with brief comments for each marsh. I .. 1, 1 5.2 . RESULTS TABLES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM001 LOCATION: (Photo 2-26) North Shore, NC SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) ? General Health Index (-X): 2.2 COMMENTS: Culvert into this marsh may need to be cleaned out. (A) Intertidal patch of marsh with a small strip of Spartina patens (B) Spartina alterniflora all the way up drainage ditch until point Typha enters the marsh from the east. Majority of marsh supports Spartina patens, Juncus gerardi, and Distichlis spicata. On the eastern border switch grass and Juncus (balticus possibly). (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM002 LOCATION: (Photo 2-26) East of Boatswain Hill, NC SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 2.1 COMMENTS: This is a unique isolated system, which is hard to approach without crossing private property. Even though the houses are very close to the marsh on the western boundary, the main channel of the tidal creek prevents easy access to the high marsh. The upper part of this system (A) is primarily forb pannes dominated by arrow-grass, black grass and some golden rod around the border zone. (B) There are two major restrictions to flushing in the high marsh: (SM002 Cont.) a stone wall and a berm. Behind the berm is a Typha stand. This area could be classified as tidal-fresh water. (C) A small stand of Phragmites is growing on an area where a tree fell into the marsh. (D) From photo interpretation (only) there appears to be an obstruction (possibly stones) at the mouth of the system. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM003 LOCATION: (Photo 1-24) Little Harbor, NC SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 1.5 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) ? General Health Index (X): 2.4 COMMENTS: This site is mostly intertidal. It is an important marsh due to the lack of similar systems in this area. There is potential for impact to the system if boat traffic into and out of Little Harbor increases and/or if the docking facilities to the west are enlarged. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM005, SM006, SM007 LOCATION: (Photo 2-24) Point West of Wentworth Hotel, NC SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 2.5 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 2.5 COMMENTS: Both intertidal and high marsh exist at these sites. SM005 - narrow band of intertidal marsh with healthy high marsh; Spartina patens and blackgrass present. SM006 - mostly intertidal with a small strip of high marsh. SM007 - (photo interpretation only) appears to have a thin stand of Spartina alterniflora; 80*/0' of area high marsh. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM008 LOCATION: (Photo 2-24) Leach's Island, NC SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Buffer/Borderzone *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) I Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & 697 (2) 997 (1) ? General Health Index (X): 2.8 COMMENTS: (photo interpretation only) Unique well-protected system. Undoubtedly provides good wildlife/waterfowl/shore bird feeding habitat. Very few large irregular pannes. Many small circular to oval pannes. indicating deeper standing water which aids survival of fish and invertebrates brought in on the higher tides. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM009 LOCATION: (Photo 2-26) Goat Island and nearby islands, NC SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re- High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) ? General Health Index (X): 2.6 COMMENTS: These are small islands of mostly intertidal marsh. The rarity-of salt marsh in the region makes these quite important despite their small size. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM010 LOCATION: (Photo 2-22, 2-24) Witch Creek, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(l) 2 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 .(2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index M: 2.6 COMMENTS: (A) At western end, large areas of black grass (Juncus gerard!) Spartina patens, silver weed (Potentilla anserina) and, to a lesser extent, seaside plantain (Plantago juncoides) and arrow-grass. Spartina alterniflora grows nearly to tree line along stream channel. Channel contains numerous rocks. (SM010 Cont.) (B) Island where marsh widens still has a good deal of black grass. Stones in creeks not evident downstream of island. (C) Small stand of Typha near golf course to the north. (D) Small stand of Scirpus along edge of marsh on southern border. Stone wall extends into marsh just east of narrows and island. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM011 ,LOCATION: (Photo 2-22) Berry's Brook, West of Brackett Road, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 1.5 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.9 COMMENTS: (A) A combination of stone walls, mosquito ditch levees and vehicle tracks on the high marsh inhibits drainage at this site. Undoubtedly an excellent birding location. Many pannes are deep enough to support Ruppia mar-it-ima and will probably contain water through the summer. (SM011 Cont.) (B) Forb pannes in evidence; area dominated by short Spartina alterniflora, arrow-grass, Salicornia, silver weed. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM012 LOCATION: (Photos 1-22, 2-24) Mouth of Berry's Brook, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 1.5 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 2.5 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(l) 1.5 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 2.2 COMMENTS: Egrets and herons sighted. (A) Four stone walls not only restrict tidal flooding, but also trap water in this area. Between 2nd and 3rd stone wall there are numerous pannes with scattered stands of short Spartina alterniflora. (SM012 Cont.) (B) Beyond restriction: a few forb pannes dominated by arrow- grass and some Salicornia. Evidence of a good deal of Salicornia at this site last year; at present Spartina alterniflora and black grass dominate. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM013 LOCATION: (Photo 1-24) Mouth of Berry's Brook, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) I Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 2.2 COMMENTS: Very healthy system. Spartina alterniflora borders outer edge; forb pannes in center. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM014 LOCATION:, (Photo 1-24) Odiorne Point, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pan nes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.-(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Buffer/Borderzone *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index M: 2.6 COMMENTS: This is a tiny but healthy saltmarsh with approximately 50% intertidal and 50% high marsh. Being so close to the influence of ocean tides and storm surges, it is remarkable that this marsh is doing so well. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM016 LOCATION: (Photo 1-22) Fairhill Swamp, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 2.5 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(1) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2.75 General Health Index (X): 2.3 COMMENTS: An important marsh due to the high number of marsh islands and the visible presence of 3000-year-old cedar stumps. This is the largest contiguous marsh area north of Hampton-Seabrook in New Hampshire. (A) Has been highly impacted by all terrain vehicles. Already water is being trapped in depressions caused by the wheels, leading to expansion of rotten spots/panne areas. Ruppia maritima is present in pond holes. This area is a rich wildlife/birding area. (SM016 Cont.) (B) More all-terrain vehicle tracks. This area is exceptionally thick with mosquitoes. A number of short Spartina .alterniflora parmes. (C) Area rich in wildlife. Raccoon, fox and deer sign. 20+ mallards and a number of egrets sighted feeding in these large pannes. Much of the drainage problems can be attributed to mosquito ditch levees. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM018 LOCATION: (Photo 1-20) Wallis Sands, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) .-Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict- *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 RelatIve--Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2)-- *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1). 3 General Health Index M: 1.9 COMMENTS: This area is becoming a freshwater/tidal system. It has a large deep pond hole which allows for survival of fauna brought in by the highest spring tides. Potential for restoration is high. Must alter culverts running under Route 1A to provide better communication with SM023. Also must direct parking lot (Wallis Sands State Beach) runoff away from SM018. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM019 LOCATION: (Photo 1-22) Marsh Road Pond, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) N/A Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions--- High(l) Low(3) -N/A Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) .,Low(3) 1.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Buffer/Borderzone *High(3) Med.(2) .,Low(l,) 3 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) 3 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & 697 (2) 997 (1). 2 General Health Index-.(X): 2.2 COMMENTS: East Rye pond is essentially a freshwater system. The major restriction. to flow is the culvert going under Parsons Road.- However, in this case the restriction is helping maintain the freshwater habitat in the pond. Excellent bordering area. Though soils classified as Terric Sulfihemists, may be closer to a Sulfihemist;-surface soil materials low in salt. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM020 LOCATION: (Photo 1-2 2) East of Marsh Road Pond, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, *797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 1 General Health Index (X): 1.1 COMMENTS: Highl impacted syste . Culvert under Marsh Road is blocked leaving little, if any, communication with main marsh system (SM023). Typhd over-running site creating a stagnant system. High mosquito breeding potential. This roadway has been known to flood (1978). TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM021 LOCATION: (Photo 2-24) Sheafe's Point, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) * Com.(l) 1.5 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 2.3 COMMENTS: This is a narrow band of healthy high marsh at the mouth of Witch's Creek, dominated by Spartina patens and Juncus gerardi, both interspersed and in pure stands. Other common species: Distichlis spicata, Puccinellia maritima, Plantago juncoides and oliganthos, Solidago sempervirens. Presence of golf course provides some buffer from disturbance, but may be contributing to encroachment of freshwater herbaceous species. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM022 LOCATION: (Photo 1-22) North West end of Parsons Creek Marsh, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index M: 1.7 COMMENTS: This section of the Parsons Creek Marsh is showing definite signs of impact, caused by a series of tidal restrictions along the drainage. The area is changing toward a freshwater tidal system with stands of Typha evident. Though loosestrife is not present at this site, it is found in SM023 and if the species migrates into MS022, it will quickly take over. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM023 LOCATION: (Photo 1-20) Parsons Creek Marsh, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(1) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 1.4 COMMENTS: This marsh is showing definite signs of impact from tidal restrictions along the creek drainage. Large areas of pannes/rotten spots and the proliferation of Sallcornia and short forms of Spartina alterniflora indicate inadequate flushing and poor drainage. Construction along Route 1A and Wallis Road has contributed to the marsh's condition. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM024 LOCATION: (Photo 1-20) West of Brackett Road at Massacre Marsh, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type- *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 2.1 COMMENTS: Culvert under Brackett Road is restricting tidal flow and spring runoff to some extent. Soil is classified 397; however from soundings taken, it appears that SM024 is approaching the upland edge of the Massacre Marsh tidal system. This site has good potential for restoration if culvert is enlarged and if obstructions at Concord Point are removed. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM025 LOCATION: (Photo 1-20) Massacre Marsh, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(1) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 2.3 COMMENTS: Area (A) in western section of SM025 is showing signs of impact. It appears that water during the higher spring tides is trapped behind the levees of the mosquito ditching. The lower part of this drainage is known as "Stinky Creek". The causes for the odor are localized at Concord point. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. (A), (B), (C), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM026 LOCATION: (Photo 1-20) South of Massacre Marsh, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. I.High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) I Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1. Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.6 COMMENTS: (Photo interpretation only) There appears to be a blockage or constriction between SM025 and SM026. Mosquito ditching and soil type indicate an impacted salt marsh. The area has changed towards a shrub-marsh with what appears to be Typha and/or Phragmites stands. The hydrology is well on its way to a freshwater-tidal system TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM027 LOCATION: (Photo 1-18) Dredge spoils site West of Rye Harbor, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) N/A Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) N/A Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) N/A Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) N/A Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(I) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(1) N/A Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 0 (dredge spoils) General Health Index (X): .75 COMMENTS: *Zero chance of restoration* This area can no longer be considered a salt marsh system. Dredge spoils deposited at this site have killed all high marsh vegetation and compressed the peat. A Phragn7ites - Typha - sedge system has replaced the once viable sedge tidal system. The area is surrounded with a berm to contain runoff of leachate from dredge spoils. The berm acts to trap freshwater and restrict tidal flow into this site. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM028 LOCATION: (Photo 1-18) South of Rye Harbor, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index M: 1.9 COMMENTS: High tides normally saturate most of this system, but drainage is inhibited around the perimeter and water is trapped by mosquito levees. Marsh shore birds (egrets, herons, plovers, ducks and an Ibis) seen in vicinity of pannes/sandholes, indicating these provide a good food source - at least during the spring and early summer. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. (SM028 Cont.) (A) Fill may have been placed in marsh in the southwest corner Deep panne present enclosed by levees. (B) Many small shallow pannes. Seems to be most impacted section of this marsh. (A), (B), (C), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM029 LOCATION: (Photo 1-18) Awcomin Marsh, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(1) 2 Soil Type 397(3) * 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2.5 General Health Index (X): 2.6 COMMENTS: A number of bedrock and/or till islands associated with this system provide good protective habitat for animal and bird species. This marsh has a variety of peat types. Due to work done to contain the dredge spoil runoff, the area behind SM027 has been cut off from the tidal ebb and flow. Phragmites has invaded this site creating a stagnant area that may contribute to the local mosquito problem. (SM029 Cont.) (A) Salicornia, short form of Spartina alterniflora and Distichlis were present, evidence that recent high tide inundated and flooded pannes in this area. (B) Large pond progressing toward freshwater tidal system. Phragmites and Typha around ponds. (C) Slumping of creek banks; stones in stream restricting tidal ebb and flow. (D) Very large area of shallow pannes with the short form of Spartina alterniflora in evidence. Many of the mosquito ditches are blocked due to slumping. List of wildlife or wildlife sign seen: Egret Kingfisher Bittern Hawk Crows Ducks (mallards and black) Fox Raccoon (A), (B), (C), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM031 LOCATION: (Photo 1-18) Between Rye Harbor and Route 1, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) I Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) I Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) I Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 0 (dredge spoils) General Health Index (X): 1.1 COMMENTS: This is an isolated pocket of marsh >80110 impacted. Soil soundings indicate dredge spoils in northwest with increasing peat layer toward the southeast. Dr. Richardson (NHSWB) states that dredge spoils were deposited here, thus explaining the berm surrounding this area. There is no visible means for tidal inundation, though the presence of Spartina patens would indicate there must be. The only culvert discovered was a rusted pipe in the southeast corner. The pipe appears (SM031 Cont.) to have been installed to allow the dredge spoils leachate to drain back into the harbor. On investigation no outlet end of the pipe could be found on the harbor side. This small, ecotone supports a great diversity of wildlife. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION' WETLAND CODE: SM032 LOCATION: (Photo 1-18) West of Rye Harbor, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) I Soil Type 397(3) * 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2.5 General Health Index (X): 1.7 COMMENTS: This area is suffering from inadequate drainage. The culvert under Route 1-A was recently replaced by the highway department. During site visit, waters were reaching the upper portions of this system. However, water backed up at the culvert on the ebbtide. (A) Freshwater is trapped during spring runoff and salt water after the higher spring tides. The integrity of the high marsh peat has (SM032 Cont.) degraded to the point that slumping is quite evident. Such slumping is exacerbating the blockages, thus increasing the trapping of waters. (B) This area supports a large shallow panne; field evidence suggests that it partially dried up the previous summer. The primary drainage ditch for the panne has filled in at its western end. Birds were observed feeding on the this panne. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. (A), (B), (C), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM033 LOCATION: (Photo 1-18) West of Locke Road, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.6 COMMENTS: A large encroachment of border zone species in southwest corner of this system, primarily Typha and Phragmites. Extensive "rotten spots" bordering private drive crossing marsh. There is evidence that a recent high spring tide has inundated this system. This area receives inadequate tidal flushing for much of the year. The stream entering from the southwest floods the area with freshwater. The tidal energy coming up the drainage is not great enough to offset this freshwater inundation from the upland. (SM033 Cont.) Tidal restrictions along the creek drainage have contributed to the restricted tidal ebb and flow. The building of the Pilot House Restaurant and its adjoining parking lot may be a causal factor. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM034 LOCATION: (Photos 1-16, 1-18) West of Locke Road, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spot s High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) I Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.6 COMMENTS: Private road crossing the marsh has led to the deterioration of this system by cutting off communication between SM033 and SM034. The culvert constructed is inadequate to allow proper flushing of the high marsh. Consequently, border zone species have encroached to within 50 feet of the tidal channel at the eastern end of this wetland. There are rotten spots present east of the drive, trapping runoff from the road. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM036 LOCATION: (Photo 1-16) East of Route 1 at Straw Point, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) I Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) 'Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) I Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.6 COMMENTS: Sounding showed 6 feet of Terric Sulfihemists peat. The flood tides are not getting into this area because the culvert into SM036 and SM034 is inadequate and there are other obstructions along the drainage. Division of the main channel (parallelling Route 1A) also has reduced the amount of tidal waters reaching this system. This is a highly impacted system with over 85%' of the original high marsh occupied by Typha. One panne in the southwest corner shows (SM036 Cont.) that the highest of spring tides will make it into this marsh. Surrounding the panne were small patches of Spartina patens and larger areas of Distichlis spicata. The panne and connecting mosquito ditch are experiencing the onset of anaerobic conditions. This area has a very high odor and mosquito potential. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM038 LOCATION: (Photo 1-14) North of Philbrick Pond, RY SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) .1 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(l) 2 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.3 COMMENTS: Evidence of recent tidal inundation. Encroaching stands of Lythruffl, Phraginites and Typha around the perimeter. Area (A) is devoid of Spartina patens and is covered with Salicornia. This area appears to trap saline waters during the higher spring tides. As the water evaporates, it creates hyper-saline conditions, killing off the high marsh vegetation, permitting only Sallcornia to survive. (SM038 Cont.) Area (B) is cut off from tidal flooding by an old trolley bed that traverses the marsh from north to south. There is very little evidence of high marsh vegetation. There is Typha and some Lythrum and an extensive area of panne formation. This area floods from runoff coming down the stream and from adjacent developed areas. This influx of fresh water, without the mitigating effect of daily tidal flooding, has caused area B to change toward a freshwater system. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. (A), (B), (C), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM039 LOCATION: (Photo 1-14) Philbrick Pond, NH SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) * Low(l) 1.5 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) * Sma.(1) 1.5 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) * Com.(1) 1.5 Soil Type 397(3) * 40,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2.5 General Health Index (X): 1.5 COMMENTS: This area is greater than 90% impacted. The system is suffering from lack of proper drainage. The mosquito ditch levees are trapping water during the higher spring tides. Standing water has led to rotting and subsidence of the marsh peat. These panne areas support bluegreen algae, mosquitoes, and other insects. Small fish and crustaceans can be observed in the deeper pannes. Many shore birds and waterfowl were seen frequenting this area. This marsh is definitely changing to a highly unproductive system. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM041 LOCATION: (Photo 1-12) Little River Swamp, NH SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) * Low(l) 1.5 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) * Com.(l) 1.5 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2.5 General Health Index (X): 1.8 COMMENTS: More than 80% of the original tidal marsh has been severely impacted. Restrictions have reduced tidal flushing dramatically, and rerouting of the main channel from its original egress in the south (A) to a dug ditch in the north (B), has shifted the ecology of the system. The original mouth of the tidal system has now become isolated above the reach of the tidal influence. Border zone species are prevalent, with Lythrum salicaria in large abundance. (SM041 Cont.) The section south of Huckleberry Lane (C) is divided by an east-west dike, south of which grows a mixture of loosestrife, cattails and sedges, and north of which is a dense stand of loosestrife. The section north of Huckleberry Lane (D) contains a small, viable but isolated high marsh (Spartina patens) in center and a small patch of Spartina patens and Distichlis spicata surrounded by Phragmites near Route 1A. Cattails are present in the southern part of this section and loosestrife is scattered throughout. The area will soon be taken over by loosestrife if nothing is done to improve the drainage. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. (A), (B), (C), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM044 LOCATION: (Photo 1-10) Meadow Pond, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) I Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1. Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(l) 2 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) *997 (1) 1 General Health Index (X): 1.4 COMMENTS: (At low tide, waters exiting Meadow Pond were at 4/10 salinity (150C); at the north end salinity was 0*110 (160C)). Meadow Pond is an excellent example of a transition from tidal marsh in the south to a freshwater-tidal system in the north, though the saltmarsh has been impacted along the border zone which is under (SM044 Cont.) development pressure. Phragmites dominates the northern border. Cranberry can be found in the wetter areas. This ecotonal area is excellent bird/wildlife habitat and should have a greater diversity of species then the tidal marsh proper. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM046 LOCATION: (Photos 1-8, 2-8) Tide Mill Creek, North of Route 51, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *L ow(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med..(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3)* Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2)- Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 2.1 COMMENTS: This is generally a healthy marsh. There are a number of deeper pond holes without rotten spots. Unfortunately, the border zone continues to suffer from development, particularly along Eel Creek. For further discussion, see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM047 LOCATION: (Photo 1-8) Isolated marshes South of Great Boar's Head, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) *Med.(2) Com.(l) 2 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) ? General Health Index M: 1.6 COMMENTS: Even though these systems are highly impacted, they serve as "natural areas" in this highly developed location. Also, they help mitigate flooding and storm drainage. (A) seems the healthiest of the 3 sites. (B) is being heavily impacted by surrounding residential area. Phragmites is well established in the eastern section of this marsh. (SM047 Cont.) (C) has encroachment of border zone species, but a small healthy section of high marsh. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM051 LOCATION: (Photo 3-8) North of Route 51, East and West of Landing Road, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical .Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) I Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.8 COMMENTS: (A) Approximately 50% is occupied by border zone species including Typha, Phragmites, and Juncus. Center of area a mixture of Spartina patens, black grass, arrow-grass and Distichlis spicara. Western end of high marsh area has a short Spartina alterniflora panne. (B) Similar to (A) but encroachment of border zone species is not as pronounced. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM054 LOCATION: (Photo 3-8) Junction Route 1 and Route 51, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2). *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type 397(3) *497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2 General Health Index (X): 1.4 COMMENTS: This area has been highly impacted and isolated from the main marsh, primarily because of road construction. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM056 LOCATION: (Photo 3-8) South of Route 51, East of Landing Road, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 2.5 General Health Index (X): 1.5 COMMENTS: Large open-water pannes, noted by Richardson (1982) as good birding area. No wildlife in evidence during site visit. These pannes are surrounded by a number of short Spartina alterniflora panne areas - a typical 11rotten spot" formation. Drainage is restricted apparently because of a combination of mosquito ditch levees, two roads, and old fences. There is a small stand of Phragmites in the northeast corner of the area; Typha is bordering the eastern edge. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM057 LOCATION: (Photo 3-10) Drakes River between Drakeside Road and Route 51, HA SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med-(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(1) I Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) I Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 2.1 COMMENTS: This is a healthy piece of marsh though there is evidence of Phragmites and Typha encroachment. A tide gate is on one of the two culverts passing under Drakeside Road; it serves no useful function. The topography does not suggest a flooding problem, nor is this close to being a fresh water system. The tide gate is just inhibiting the flow and contributing to the encroachment of the border zone species. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM058 LOCATION: (Photos 3-8, 4-8) Taylor River and Drakes River between Route 1 and 195, HA HF SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) * Low(l) 1.5 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 2.5 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(1) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) I Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index M: 2.1 COMMENTS: Restrictions at the railroad bed and Route 1 have contributed to the lack of tidal flushing of these upper reaches of the marsh. Also the extensive mosquito ditch levees have inhibited adequate drainage. Borderzone species such as Phragmites and Typha have entered the marsh near the extremities. This area is rich in wildlife sign and birds. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM059 LOCATION: (Photo 3-8) Taylor River between RR tracks and Route 1, HA HF SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) *Med.( 2) Low(3) 2 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) I Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (R): 2 COMMENTS: Area behind railroad bed not draining adequately. Opening to south inadequate. As tidal water floods this area, tidal energy is lost at Route 1, causing ponding. On ebb tide, the force of outgoing water is less than the tidal energy coming in, so drainage takes a longer period of time. - Mosquitoes seemed to be bad compared to other similar areas. - Vegetation primarily short Spartina alterniflora, Salicornia (SM059 cont.) intermixed with Spartina patens. There were a number of "rafted" pieces of marsh peat deposited in this area. The peat was undoubtedly broken off or slumped further down the drainage. As the high tide came in the peat was moved upstream until it reached the Route 1 barrier where it was deposited. It has been noted by F. Richardson, that this type of area is good for birding. This seems to be correct, based on large concentration of egrets and herons. -TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION 'WETLAND CODE: SM061 LOCATION: (Photo 3-6) Hampton Falls River, HF SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(Z) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(1) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 2.3 COMMENTS: A relatively healthy system; culvert under railroad tracks is adequate in size. (A) Spike grass and short Spartina alterniflora with patches of black grass and arrow-grass. Predominant vegetation Spartina patens. Old mosquito ditch levees along with some slumping has contributed to capturing some water; however, this is not very extensive. Hawk, heron(s), egrets, deer sign. (SM061 Cont.) (B) Dam at pond west of 1A. Some tidal restrictions in creek before dam. Borderzones have stands of Typha and Lythrum. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM062 LOCATION: (Photo 3-6) Browns River, HF SE SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) * Low(3) 2.5 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (R): 1.9 COMMENTS: Culvert under railroad trestle seems undersized; drainage inadequate. Some circular deep pond holes. Extensive areas of large irregular- shaped pannes surrounded primarily by short Spartin,a alterniflora. Deer sign at edge of marsh. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM063 LOCATION: (Photo 2-4) Cains Brook, West of Causeway Road, SE SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(1) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(1) 1 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, *797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 1 General Health Index M: 1.4 COMMENTS: Major restriction is under private road. Damming caused by stones, logs and stumps, causing ponding of water to west. (A) Spartina patens with seaside goldenrod and sedges near channel. Sparse stand of short Spartina alterniflora. The area is changing toward a freshwater tidal regime. Also present was silver weed and Typha (on the border). (SM063 Cont.) (B) Large areas of Juncus. Limit of salt marsh vegetation. (C) Tidal to freshwater. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM064 LOCATION: (Photo 2-4) Cains Brook, East of Causeway Road, SE SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size Large(3) *Med.(2) Sma.(l) 2 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index M: 2.3 COMMENTS: (A) Forb pannes dominated by arrow-grass. Some recently dried out pannes with short form of Spartina alterniflora with some Salicornia. Slumped mosquito ditches seem the main reason for trapped waters in these panne areas. Remainder of marsh mostly Spartina patens interspersed with stands of blackgrass. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM065 LOCATION:' (Photos 1-4, 1-6, 1-8; 2-4, 2-6, 2-8; 3-6, 3-8) Hampton/ Seabrook Estuary, East of RR tracks, HA HF-SE SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations *High(3) Med.(2) Low(l) 3 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) *Med.(2) Low(l) 2 Relative Size *Large(3) Med.(2) Sma.(1) 3 Relative Uniqueness *Rare(3) Med.(2) Com.(l) 3 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 COMMENTS: General Health Index (X): 2.9 This system is New Hampshire's best example of a large productive salt marsh. Saltmarshes SM044-SM067 are all part of this tidal system, totalling about 3,500 acres. Area along Hampton River behind Hampton Beach is experiencing high impact both from development and all-terrain vehicles along the edge of marsh. (SM065 Cont.) Development of Mills Point and Riverside have adversely affected the marsh in the immediate vicinity. For further discussion see Appendix Section 5.3. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SPI066 LOCATION: (Photo 1-2) Between South Main Street and Route 86, SE SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots High(l) * Med.(2) Low(3) 1.5 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Obstruct./Restrict. High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relat ive Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) I Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type *397(3) 497,597, 797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 3 General Health Index (X): 1.6 COMMENTS: Tidal restriction at point where stream passes under Route 86C.- (A) Western 25"to' covered with Phragmites and Typha. High marsh primarily rotten spots with short form of Spartina alterniflora. Fill from recently excavated mosquito ditch has been placed on high marsh. Will act to inhibit tidal flow across surface of marsh, leading to eventual death of Spartina patens and further degradation of marsh. (SM066 Cont.) (B) Healthy high marsh with small amounts of short form of Spartina alterniflora. Stones in creek create obstruction at culvert under South Main St. (A), (B), etc. refer to locations on wetland maps. TIDAL MARSH SITE EVALUATION WETLAND CODE: SM067 LOCATION: (Photo 1-2) South of South Main Street, SE SUBJECT SCORE TOTAL Pannes/Rotten Spots *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) 1 Indicator Species Re: High Saline Conditions High(l) *Med.(2) Low(3) 2 Borderzone/Freshwater Species Encroachment High(l) Med.(2) *Low(3) 3 Obstruct./Restrict. *High(l) Med.(2) Low(3) I Unique Geological/ Topographical Formations High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Buffer/Borderzone High(3) Med.(2) *Low(l) 1 Relative Size Large(3) Med.(2) *Sma.(l) 1 Relative Uniqueness Rare(3) Med.(2) *Com.(l) 1 Soil Type 397(3) 497,597, *797 & & 697 (2) 997 (1) 1 General Health Index (X): 1.3 COMMENTS: This marsh has little communication with SM066 or SM065.The large ditch surrounding it was full of standing water at low tide. Even though the marsh itself is highly impacted with extensive rotten spots this may be a good habitat for waterfowl and shorebirds. Dominant species is short form of Spartina alterniflora. 5.3 IMPACT ANALYSIS OF SELECTED SALT MARSHES Concord Point Drainage, Rye This drainage includes not only Parsons (SM022, SM023) and Massacre Marsh (SM025) Creeks, but also a number of small isolated pockets of marsh (SM018, SM019, SM020) that communicate via culverts with the main tidal creeks. Table 9 summarizes some of the impacts that have contributed to the marsh's degradation. In 1985, the Town of Rye obtained Coastal Zone Management monies to remove obstructions and restrictions along the course of Parsons Creek. The objective was to increase tidal ebb and flow into the upper reaches of the marsh. In the spring of 1985, work was carried out to: (1) straighten the channel at Concord Point, (2) remove the obstructions in the creek at the site of the old Wallis Road bed and (3) dredge the channel of the creek at the point it passes under Wallis Road. After this work was completed, field investigations confirmed that tidal innundation had increased in the upper reaches of the marsh, but further analysis is needed to determine the long-term benefit of these actions. Restrictions along the creek remain, and further actions should be taken to continue the removal of these materials (Simpson, 1986). Increased tidal flooding into the higher reaches of the system (including the small isolated pockets) would stem the advancement of the invasive species Phragmites, Typha, Lythrum, Scirpus, etc. These border zone plants would gradually die back and the restoration of high marsh species could proceed. Philbrick Brook Drainage, Rye The situation in this series of marshes (SM028, SM032, SM033, SM034, SM036) is similar to that described for the Concord Point drainage. Through the years construction of a number of roads has inadvertently choked off the upper reaches of this salt marsh. Each time a road was TABLE 9. Summary Of Impacts At Parsons Creek Marsh SITE NAME LOCATION DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Concord Point East of Route 1-A where Grounded barge has shifted "Stinky Creek" empties stream channel and reduced into the ocean flow. Old Wallis Road South of Wallis Road; Old bridge abutments have looks like a stone wall fallen into creek re- running through the marsh stricting ebb and flow of the tide. Wallis Road Road running east-west Stones, sand, and debris through center of marsh. accumulate un der and on either side of bridge, impeding ebb and flow of tide. Red Roof Corner of Route 1-A Loss of marsh due to place- Market Area and Wallis Road; also ment of gravel-fill over ("Trash Corner") residence to north of marsh. Fill is being under- Market cut by creek; debris is being used to stabilize bank. Horse Paddock North of Red Roof Market, Encroachment onto marsh; built in major ox-bow of organics, nitrogen, creek etc. finding way into creek waters. Wallis Sands/ Northern end of marsh Rerouting of I-A isolated Route 1A before junction of 1-A segment of marsh from and Parsons Road main drainage system; changing to brackish conditions added, the movement of salt water through the peat was inhibited. The road beds either replaced the peat or compressed the peat so that subsurface tidal waters could not pass underneath these barriers. Thus, areas of salt marsh that hydrologically communicated with each other are now isolated except for the tidal waters that can move through the culverts under these roadways. A good example is the private drive that was built across the marsh, cutting off SM033 from SM034. The construction of Ocean Boulevard early in this century created a smiliar effect. In addition to road construction, other activities, such as the development of Rye Harbor and the riprapping of the major creek channels, helped to cut off infiltration of tidal waters into the creek bank peat. Also, near the Pilot House Restaurant, rocks from riprap appear to have fallen into the creek, blocking tidal flow into SM032, SM033, etc. and ultimately reducing the distance the tidal bore can move through the tidal creeks. Little can be done about the roads already built across the tidal marsh, except to insure that culverts are large enough to allow adequate ebb and flow of the tidal waters. A culvert of adequate size will not cause damming of waters on the ebb tide. The.overall health of the system can be improved by removing all rocks and stones along the drainage that either inhibit tidal inundation on the flood tide or restrict draining of the marsh on the ebb tide. Such mitigation activi- ties might precede work on culverts discussed above. In addition, a maintenance schedule should be established for all culverts to insure clear passage of tidal waters. Golf Course Drainage, (Bass Beach) Rye This marsh (SM038) is the southern-most saltmarsh in the Town of Rye. The upland stream feeding this area flows from a golf course west of Causeway Road and exits through a culvert under Route 1A into the ocean. Short (1985) states that at one time this drainage entered the Bass Beach Marsh (Philbrick Pond) to the south. An old trolley bed traverses the marsh from north to south approximately 650 feet west of Route 1A. During the site visits there was ample evidence that the tide had entered and inundated the marsh. Spartina alterniflora is present for about 150 feet upstream of the Route 1A culvert. Spartina patens is prevalent up to 600 feet west of Route 1A. At about 600 feet there is a SpartinalTypha interface. Typha as well as Phragmites and Lythrum salicaria are prevalent along the northern and western borders of the marsh. Of particular note is an area in the eastern section of the marsh, close to Route 1A, where a large area is devoid of Spartina patens, and is domin ated by Salicornia. The area immediately west of the trolley bed is a highly impacted high marsh, with sparse stands of Spartina, a great deal of Typha and some Lythrum. It appears to be flooded by the highest of the yearly tides, but seems quite stagnant most of the year making it prime mosquito breeding habitat. The upland stream has a very organic substrate until approximately 200 feet east of Causeway Road where the bottom substrate. is primarily sand and small stones. If the opening through the trolley bed were enlarged and the stream cleared of obstructions, the increased ebb and flow of the tide into this isolated area would not only alleviate the stagnation, but help restore the high marsh vegetation. A flapper valve, which was presumably attached to the ocean end of the culvert running under Route 1A, now lies (unattached) on the rocks to the south of the pipe opening. Its function was to keep the tidal waters from flooding the marsh; its earlier operation contributed to the marsh's present condition. The presence of the large area dominated by Salicornia indicates th at this part of the marsh (closest to Route 1A) is being inundated by saline waters during the higher spring tides. During the summer, tides are not high enough to periodically soak this area; the saltwater that was trapped on the marsh evaporates and creates a hypersaline condition in this section of the marsh. Spartina is unable to grow, but the more salt tolerant Sallcornia appears to thrive. In order to increase tidal flushing and restore the high marsh vegetation, the pipe now running under Route 1A must be redesigned or enlarged. A second, and more costly, alternative is to install another pipe to the north, running under Route 1A, which would allow greater amounts of salt water to inundate the marsh during a flood tide. The benefits would be both the reestablishment of the high marsh plants and the decline of the border zone species which are now invading the system. Philbrick Pond, North Hampton This small tidal system (SM039) is an excellent birding location, partly because of the confluence of a number of small drainages entering the southwest end of Philbrick Pond. The pond's outlet flows under an old trolley bed, and travels by culvert under Route 1A to the ocean. Spartina alterniflore (tall form) is found along the channel and at the upper end of the pond. The short form of Spartina alterniflora, along with Salicornia, is found in the rotten spot/panne areas which have dried out. Stands of Phragmites are present along the western border of this area. Some loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) appears just upland from the marsh (Short, 1985). The main problem at Philbrick Pond is a lack of adequate drainage. The levees along the numerous mosquito ditches have created a patchwork of enclosed areas. These areas trap saline water during the higher spring tides. The standing salt water inhibits the growth of Spartina patens. As the water evaporates, these pannes are invaded by species of Salicornia and the short from of Spartina alterniflora, two plants that can withstand high saline conditions. This is not a stable ecosystem. The size and extent of the pannes have increased rapidly over the last ten years, and could continue to expand (Short, 1985). To restore this area the outflow channel from Philbrick Pond should be enlarged, and the pannes should be drained through ditching. Material excavated from such a ditching operation should be removed from the marsh. Moreover, some of the shallower pannes should be deepened so as to insure survival of fauna brought in on the high tides. If more water is allowed to enter the marsh during the tidal cycles and the drainage restrictions are removed, the outgoing water will flush the channels and re-establish adequate communication with the ocean. Little River Marsh, North Hampton and Hampto Before 1950, Little River Marsh (SM041) had access to the ocean through a channel that flowed under Route 1A at the town line of North Hampton and Hampton. This channel has since been blocked, reducing the marsh's communication with the ocean to one man-made channel to the north, a culvert that runs under Route 1A near the junction with Sea Road. Spartina patens is in evidence in this marsh, and can be seen as far upstream as Fifield Road. There is one stand of Spartina alterniflora. In addition there are stands of Typha and Phragmites which border this area. Lythrum salicaria has invaded this system and now covers 60% of the former marsh area (Short, 1985). This invasion of loosestrife occurred after the old channel had been blocked. The prevalence of loosestrife indicates that much of this marsh does not have an adequate flow of tidal waters. The culverts at 1A and under Fifield Road may contribute to the tidal restriction. If these restrictions were reduced and/or if additional ocean access could be secured, tidal flushing would be enhanced. The flushing would curtail the invasion of the loosestrife and encourage the re-establishment of high marsh vegetation, rendering the area a productive tidal marsh. Hampton-Seabrook Marsh System, Hampton, Hampton Falls and Seabrook The six to seven thousand acres of tidal wetlands along the coast represent only a small percentage of the total wetlands in the State. It is because of this limited acreage that these systems should be protected as unique and valuable State resources. The Hampton- Seabrook Estuary is the largest contiguous tidal marsh system in New Hampshire, comprising about 3500 acres. Most of these associated tidal wetlands are in good condition though there are outlying areas and isolated pockets that are suffering from developmental pressures and/or manmade constrictions. A train track on a raised'bed traverses the western side of the Hampton-Seabrook marsh. This, together with Route 1 to the west, has resulted in the restriction of tidal ebb and flow. There are a number of areas beyond these restrictions that have extensive panne/ rotten spots due to a lack of proper drainage. The areas bordering the Hampton Beach development (SM065) are showing signs of severe impact. This is due not only to the continued encroachment by construction activities, but also to the fact that the marsh is so accessible at this location. The high concentration of people during the summer months results in the marsh being trampled. The Hampton-Seabrook system, overall, should be considered a prime tidal wetland and accorded all appropriate relief from current impacts and protection from further disturbance. For further discussion of Prime Wetland status of this tidal system, see Richardson's (1982) Identification, Documentation and Mapping of Prime Tidal Wetlands In The Town of Hampton, New Hampshire. 6.0 APPENDIX: SAND DUNES, DETAILED RESULTS 6.1 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS The twelve sand dune areas evaluated in the study area were sampled only for plant species. The plants were listed in the same manner as for wetlands. The computer was used to produce ecological summaries, despite the inappropriateness of wetland data computations for these sandy upland communities. Refer to Section 3.3 for a more complete description of dune ecology, impacts and management. The following results are useful as representative lists of the plant species occurring at the sites sampled. At the end of each species list is a number between 0 and 1.0 following the label "DUNE: This is the computed fraction of the plant abundances from the site which are considered to be dune indicator species (Table 6, section 3.3). This number is 1.000 for a community comprised of only dune species, and 0.000 for a community with no dune species. This fraction gives the user a rough idea of how pure the community is for foredune species (1.00) or how many upland sandy species have taken over for the pioneer dune species (less than 1.00). Numbers less than 1.00 do not imply lower value to the dune ecology. For example, poison ivy,'common throughout the inland parts of the state, cannot be considered to be a dune indicator, so its presence lowers the "DUNE" fraction. But it is one of the most useful dune species, according to Dr. Lazell (1976): "Resplendent in lovely purples, scarlets, russets, ochres, and greens, growing first as a ground trailing vine, then low herbage, then as dense shrubbery, and someday even attaining the character of a small tree, poison ivy is the finest and most wonderful of all our plants. Poison ivy holds the shifting sands; it shades and shelters the birds and animals; its berries richly augment the complex ecological chain; best of all, poison ivy keeps people off the land. It is the trouncing, trampling feet of man that crush and kill the fragile plants of the dunes, and set the sand to blowing mercilessly inland." I I 6.2 RESULTS TABLES FOR STUDY AREA I I I I I I I I I I I @ I I I I I I - Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-20) Wallis Sands State Beach, jct with Marsh Rd, RY DUO01 Field Date: 06/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Rosa rugosa Salt-spray rose 8 0.00 S 1 Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac 2 0.00 T 2 Prunus maritima Beach plum 1 0.00 S .2 Crataegus sp. Hawthorn 3 0.00 T 11 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 1 0.82 S 2 Solanum dulcamara Bittersweet 2 0.50 H 0 Euphorbia cyparissia5 Cypress spurge 8 0.00 H 0 Juncus tenuis Path rush 1 0.50 H 0 Agrostis alba, Redtop grass 2 0.82 H 0 Asclepias syriaca Common milkweed 2 0.50 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 2 0.82 H 0 Oenothera biennis Evening primrose 5 0.18 H 0 Senecio sp. Ragwort 1 H 0 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 50 0.00 H 0 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 12 0.00 H 0 Taraxacum officinale Dandelion 1 0.50 H 1 Artemisia stelleriana Dusty miller 6 0.18 H 0 Cakile edentula Searocket 6 0.18 H 0 Agropyron repens Quack grass 1 0.00 H 1 WSI: 0.089 WFV: 0.048 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.070 DUNE:. 0.570 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.07 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.07 NARROW: 0.41 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NUVW WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community No-rmandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-16) Jenness Beach, RY DUO02 Field Date: 06/04/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Rosa rugosa Salt-spray rose 3 0.00 S 1 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 5 0.00 H & Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 70 0.00 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 5 0.82 H 0 Bromus tectorum Cheat grass 25 0.00 H 0 Cakile edentula Searocket 2 0.18 H 0 Euphorbia cyparissias Cypress spurge 2 0.00 H 0 WSI: 0.039 WFV: 0.006 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.062 DUNE: 0.687 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.02 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.01 NARROW: 0.84 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NUV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-12) Plaice Cove, E of Rtl, HA DUO03 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Pinus rigida Pitch pine 3 0.18 T 3 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 2 0.00 H @O Rosa rugosa Salt-spray rose 3 0.00 S 'i Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 40 0.00 H 0 Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 1 0.50 S 2 Artemisia stelleriana Dusty miller 1 0.18 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 2 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.055 WFV: 0.067 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.038 DUNE: 0.903 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.05 COMPACT: 0.01 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.76 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NUV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-12) N of Plaice Cove, W of RtlA, HA DUO04 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 2 0.50 S 2 Quercus ilicifolia Bear (scrub) oak 3 0.00 S 4 Prunus maritima Beach plum 1 0.00 S 3 Pinus rigida Pitch pine 2 0.18 T 3 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 30 0.00 H 0 Hudsonia tomentosa Poverty-grass 5 0.00 S 0 Poaceae Grasses 10 H 1 WSI: 0.031 WFV: 0.165 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.000 DUNE: 0.811 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.05 COMPACT: 0.13 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.75 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNU WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-6) Hampton Beach State Park, HA DUO05 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 12 0.00 H 0 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 70 0.00 H 9 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 2 0.82 H 10 Trifolium repens White clover 2 0.00 H 2 WSI: 0.019 WFV: 0.011 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.023 DUNE: 0.837 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.00 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.00 . NARROW: 0.81 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-6) S o f HA Harbor inlet, W of RtIA, HA SE DUO06 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 10 0.00 H 0 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 40 0.00 H Euphorbia cyparissias Cypress spurge 1 0.00 H Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 3 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.045 WFV: 0.000 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.055 DUNE: 0.796 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.00 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.01 NARROW: 0.74 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-6) Bec kmans Point, E of RtlA, SE DUO07 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 5 0.00 H 0 Solid*ago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 2 0.82 H 10 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 50 0.00 H 10 WSI: 0.028 WFV: 0.000 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.035 DUNE: 0.912 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.00 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.87 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-6) S of HA Harbor inlet, W of Rt1A, SE DTJO08 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Solidago semp ervirens Seaside goldenrod. 2 0.82 H 0 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 50 0.00 H 0 WSI: 0.031 WFV: 0.000 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.038 DUNE: 1.000 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.00 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.96 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:N WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-4) The Sands, W of RtlA, SE DUO09 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Amelanchier canadensis Canada serviceber. ry 10 0.50 T 1 Prunus maritima Beach plum 10 0.00 S -3 Pinus rigida Pitch pine 10 0.18 T Crataegus sp. Hawthorn 2 0.00 T 1 Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 15 0.50 S 2 Rhus radicans Poison ivy 8 0.82 S 2 Rosa virginiana Virginia rose 9 0.50 S 1 Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac 6 0.00 T 2 Prunus serotina Black cherry 5 0.18 T 3 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen 2 0.00 T 2 Lonicera morrowi Morrow's honeysuckle 12 0.00 S 1 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 60 0.00 H 0 Hudsonia tomentosa Poverty-grass 4 0.00 S 0 Oenothera parviflora Evening primrose 3 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 3 0.82 H 0 Danthonia spicata Poverty grass 12 0.00 H 0 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 3 0.00 H 0 Artemisia caudata Wormwood 1 0.00 H 0 Puccinellia maritima Alkali grass 1 1.00 H 0 Puccinellia paupercula Alkali grass 1 0.82 H 0 Lechea maritima Pinweed 1 0.00 H 0 Limonium carolinianum Sea lavender 1 1.00 H 0 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper 2 0.00 S 1 Andropogon scoparius Broom beardgrass 15 0.00 H 0 Aristida tuberculosa Seabeach needle grass 1 H 0 Cakile edentula Searocket 1 0.18 H 0 Cyperus grayii Gray's sedge 1 H 0 Euphorbia polygonifolia Seaside spurge 1 0.00 H 0 Solidago rugosa Rough-leaved goldenrod 1 0.50 H 0 WSI: 0.164 WFV: 0.213 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.034 DUNE: 0.527 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.04 BUSHY: 0.05 COMPACT: 0.13 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0,00 NARROW: 0.45 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNPUV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-4) Sea brook beach, E.of RtIA, SE DUO10 Field Date: 06/05/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Rosa rugosa Salt-spray rose 8 0.00 S I Myrica pensylvanica Bayberry 2 0.50 S 2 Prunus maritima Beach plum 1 0.00 S 3 Cakile edentula Searocket 1 0.18 H 0 Artemisia stelleriana Dusty miller 1 0.18 H 0 Solanum dulcamara Bittersweet 2 0.50 H 0 Euphorbia cyparissias Cypress spurge 2 0.00 H 0 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 5 0.00 H 0 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 50 0.00 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 2 0.82 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 2 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.074 WFV: 0.049 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.065 DUNE: 0.776 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.01 BUSHY: 0.10 COMPACT: 0.02 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.02 NARROW: 0.65 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNUVW WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-26) New Castle Beach, NC DUO12 Field Date: 06/17/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Pinus rigida Pitch pine 2 0.18 T 3 Pinus rigida Pitch pine 1 0.18 S T Rosa rugosa Salt-spray rose 8 0.00. S I Rhus radicans Poison ivy 2 0.82 S 2 Spiraea latifolia Meadowsweet 4 0.50 S 0 Juniperus communis Juniper 1 0.00 S 1 Rumex crispus Curled dock 1 0.82 H 0 Ambrosia artemesiifolia Common ragweed @1 0.00 H 4 Oenothera biennis Evening primrose 1 0.18 H 0 Artemisia stelleriana Dusty miller 3 0.18 H 0 Artemisea vulgaris Common mugwort 2 0.00 H 0 Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed 1 0.00 H 3 Taraxacum officinale Dandelion 1 0.50 H 1 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 2 0.00 H 0 Daucus carota Queen anne's lace 2 0.00 H 0 Ammophila breviligulata Dune grass 90 0.00 H 0 Tanacetum vulgare Common tansy 2 0.00 H 0 Agropyron repens Quack grass 5 0.00 H 1 Brassica sp. Mustard 1 0.00 H 0 Lepidium campestre Cow-cress 3 0.00 H 1 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 1 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.052 WFV: 0.070 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.007 DUNE: 0.723 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.05 COMPACT: 0.03 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.00 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.73 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:CNUV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community Normandeau Assoc. Inc: E C 0 L 0 G I C A L S U M M A R Y Location: (Photo 1-12) Plaice Cove, HA NH DUO13 Field Date: 06/30/86 Report Date: 06/30/86 Scientific name Common name Abun- Wetl Type Food dance Freq Value Rosa rugosa Salt-spray rose 4 0.00 S I Rhus radicans Poison ivy 2 0.82 S 2 Ammophila breviligulata Dune g rass 60 0.00 H 01 Lathyrus japonicus Beach pea 10 0.00 H 0 Artemisia stelleriana Dusty miller 2 0.18 H 0 Solidago sempervirens Seaside goldenrod 3 0.82 H 0 Oenothera biennis Evening primrose 3 0.18 H 0 Phragmites communis Reed 3 0.82 H 0 WSI: 0.085 WFV: 0.022 BOG: 0.000 SALT: 0.034 DUNE: 0.747 SHRUB SBCL: AQUATIC: 0.00 SAPLINGS: 0.00 BUSHY: 0.04 COMPACT: 0.00 MARSH SBCL: ROBUST: 0.03 BROADL: 0.00 NARROW: 0.'68 FLOATING: 0.00 SUBTYPES:NRUV WATERSHED: Beach Dunes TYPE: Sand Dune Community DATE DUE GAYLORDINo. 2333 PRINTEDINU.S.A, 3 6668 14108 1887