[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
I HT 393 P4 C6 1982 IX . . . . . . ...... ........................... ........ 07, *K: ............... ....... . . .. .......... ------------------- . .... MORRISVILLE BOROUGH Bucks County, Pe'nnsylvania AS PART OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM . .. ............ @-x . . .... .... .. .. . ...... . --z ..... ....... .. . .. ..... =mum-rl"m FUJI MORRISVILLE BOROUGH Bucks r P ... yN.... ';c4 .......... K*Kx Kill Dwastal PREPARED FOR: MORRISVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL Funded and Coordinated through Dept ol En:tronmental Resources oilm a R ,, m Management PREPARED BY: DIRECTION ASSOCIATES, INC., URBAN PLANNERS C..S"' Zone Management Office WE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MORRISVILLE BOROUGH BUCKS COUNTY As Part of the Implementation of the PENNSYLVANIA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PREPARED FOR: MORRISVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL PREPARED BY: DIRECTION ASSOCIATES, INC., URBAN PLANNERS SEPTEMBER, 1982 US Department of Commerce NOAA Coastal Services Center Library 2234 South Avenue Charleston, SC 29405-2413 The preparation of this report was financed through the Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Management Program under the pro- visions of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, (as amended), administered by the Coastal Zone Management Office, office of Resources Management, Pennsylvania Depart- ment of Environmental Resources. MAYOR Lee D. Rockafellow BOROUGH COUNCIL Nicholas Pelehaty, President Michael Demech, Vice President Thomas Rohner John Hofmann Patricia Schell Edgar Solt Charles Grabowski George R. Mount, III PLANNING COMMISSION Charles Kise, Chairman Raymond Cowell Rosemary Fogarty John Engelberger BOROUGH MANAGER Harry F. Falkenstein TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT ................................ 8 POPULATION ............................................ 13 ECONOMIC BASE ......................................... 20 LAND USE .............................................. 29 COMMUNITY FACILITIES .................................. 41 SUMMARY OF THE PLAN ................................... 49 PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS ............................ 55 PLAN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES .......................... 57 PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL AREAS ............................. 58 PLAN FOR INDUSTRIAL AREAS ............................. 60 PLAN FOR TRANSPORTATION ............................... 61 EFFECTUATION .......................................... 63 I. INTRODUCTION This update of the Morrisville Comprehensive Plan was made possible through a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, which administers the Pennsyl- vania Coastal Zone Management Program. Pennsylvania operates its Coastal Zone Management Program under Sec- tion 306 of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act. Pursuant to the grant, Direction Associates, Inc., was contracted to provide an updated framework for municipal decision making for Morrisville, which is consistent with the Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Management Program, and to prepare recommendations concerning modifications to the Borough's Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision/Land Development Ordinances. Direction Associates, Inc., takes this opportunity to ack- nowledge the cooperation of the Morrisville Borough Plan- ning Commission, the Bucks County Planning Commission, and the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission in the preparation of this document. Since this is by design an update of the existing Compre- hensive Plan, it has been decided that some of the texts of both the Comprehensive Plan prepared in 1966 and the Comprehensive Plan Supplement prepared in 1970 would be incorporated verbatim in this Update. Both of these docu- ments, which were prepared by the Bucks County Planning Commission, contain valuable research and insights per- taining to the development of Morrisville. This work should be preserved and merged with new information and any new recommendations pertaining to future land use and develop- ment within the Borough. It is believed that a useful chronology of planning in Morrisville will result from this approach. In 1966, the Bucks County Planning Commission commented on the need for, and the process of, planning. These comments are worthy of review, for they are still relevant. "Need for a Plan: The modern urban community is a highly complex structure. Its land and buildings are used for an endless variety of purposes and these purposes are made -1- N possible through an extremely complex series of facilities such as streets, water lines, sewer systems, schools, parks, fire stations, and other facilities. Not only is each part of the community structure complex and important itself, but each also interacts in various ways with all the other elements. For example, the conversion of a sin- gle family home for multiple dwelling use influences far more than the residents of that building - it contributes to traffic volumes and parking demands, it often increases public school enrollment, and it also puts new burdens on unseen public facilities such as water and sewer. Because of the complex and interrelated character of an urban com- munity, the problems that exist today can seldom be solved individually, and in recent years the responsibility for coordinating problem solving activities has become more and more the responsibility of the local municipal govern- ment." "Each time an individual or a public agency constructs an improvement, however small, the Borough changes. The Com- prehensive Plan will guide such change so that Morrisville can become a better place in which to live and work. It will influence the decisions of individuals; it will serve as a policy guide for the Borough Council; it will become the foundation of various laws and programs, such as zon- ing and urban renewal. Because the objectives and needs of the Borough may change from time to time, the Planning Commission intends to review and reassess the major pro- posals of the Plan periodically in the light of changing conditions." "What is Planning and Why? For community planning to suc- ceed, a clear understanding of the meaning of planning and the process by which a plan is made is essential. The following statements help to explain the meaning of planning and the purposes of planning. 'It is the job of the planning agency - on the basis of its study of social, economic, and physical con- ditions and trends in the city - to assist in formu- lating over-all policies and plans for the guidance of the legislative body L. Segoe. Local Planning Administration (Public Administration Service), 1941. -2- 'Planning . . . is not an operating function. Its job is not to carry out programs of public or private de- velopment but to create the organized pattern which will guide public and private endeavor in producing a better and more efficient urban community. Further- more, planning is not a method of finding ways for spending more tax dollars but rather a process designed to obtain the greatest efficiency and lasting benefit from each dollar spent in the physical development of the community, whether from public or private sources.' Chamber of Commerce of the United States. City Plan- ning and Urban Development, 1952. 'There are many reasons why . . . officials adopt planning - and why forward-looking citizens support them when they do.. These reasons are illustrated by the six functions of planning: 1. Planning is a means of preparing for the future. 2. Planning helps to get at the roots of problems. 3. Planning helps do first things first. 4. Planning helps set sound policies for development. 5. Planning is a technique for coordination. 6. The planning process is a means of correlating, educating, and inspiring.'" Community Planning Division of Sears, Roebuck and Company. The abc's of Community Planning, 1962. "We believe planning is necessary to give reality to the coordinated and orderly development of the Borough, and to insure that this development will lead to the results de- sired by Borough residents. We believe planning is the only logical choice and the only rational means of guiding physi- cal development, and we believe the rights of citizens and the responsibilities of government require the use of plan- ning in making decisions concerning physical development." "The Definition of a Comprehensive Plan: The word "plan", according to Webster's International Dictionary, "is the general word for a proposed method of action".,, "In this sense, most individuals and organizations plan for their future activities. Such plans may be mental, written notations, or a published document. They may emphasize 00 scheduling, financing or express goals and ideas. There- fore, depending upon the originator and upon the purpose of a plan, each plan will have certain characteristics. Most community development plans are similar, since their originator is the municipal government and their purpose is community development." "A Comprehensive Plan for physical development is defined as follows: .'@The (comprehensive) . . . plan is the official statement of a municipal legislative body which sets forth its major policies concerning desirable future physical development; the published . . . (comprehen- sive) plan document must include a single, unified general physical design for the community, and it must attempt to clarify the relationship between phy- sical development policies and social and economic goals.11 "The. Essential Elements of a Comprehensive Plan: Three elements are generally recognized as being essential to a Comprehensive Plan. They are defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as follows:2 The Land Use Section: Projects future community land needs, showing by location and extent, areas to be used for residential, commercial, industrial, and pub- lic purposes. The Community Facilities Section: Shows the location, type, capacity, and area served, of present and pro- jected or needed community facilities, including rec- reation areas, schools, libraries, and other public buildings. It may also show other public utilities and services. 1T.J.Kent, Jr.,The Urban General Plan, Chandler Publishing Company, San Francisco, 1964. 2 Housing and Home Finance Agency, Answers on the Comprehen- sive Community Plan (Program Guide 2) Washington, D.C., August, page 3. -4- The Thoroughfare Section: Provides a system of major streets, existing and proposed, distinguishing between limited access, primary, and secondary thoroughfares, and relating major thoroughfares to the road network of the surrounding area." "Steps of the Planning Process: -The planning process includes four major steps: (1) survey and analysis of existing condi- tions, (2) policy determination or the establishment of goals and standards, (3) synthesis of existing conditions and goals into a Comprehensive Plan, and (4) effectuation. (1) Survey and Analysis: The purpose of this first step is to objectively review in detail a wide range of exist- ing conditions and to determine the important and es- sential elements or characteristics of these conditions. The background data and basic planning studies in this report have guided the Commission in both determining the facts and drawing important conclusions concerning the social, economic and physical factors which influ- ence the character of the Borough and control'the possibilities for future development. In other words, the survey and analysis of existing conditions provided the information upon which the policies were determined and the plan formulated. (2) Policy Determination: The identification of the Bor- 6-u-gh's role in Buc County and the Region, the devel- opment of goals, and the adoption of standards to serve as a guide in developing the planning proposals of the Comprehensive Plan are the elements which constitute general comprehensive planning policies. Determination of policy, however, is as important as the policies themselves. Determination refers to the act of coming to a decision after observation, investi- gation, and study of the available information. Through citizen participation, the people in the com- munity are given an opportunity to express the goals and aspirations that they believe should be reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. Citizen participation is obtained via technical advisory committees, civic or- ganizations, public meetings, public hearings, press coverage, publications, and educational programs. -5- (3) The Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan synthe- sized the facts and information gained in the survey and analysis with the policies established in the poli- cy determination step. In other words, the Comprehensive Plan is the product of a process of reasoning which: (a) Begins with the accumulation and comprehension of facts and information in Step (1). (b) Proceeds to the determination of policy in Step (2). (c) Continues to the formulation of the Comprehensive Plan in Step (3). The uses of a Comprehensive Plan are several: First and foremost, the Comprehensive Plan provides a means for setting forth a unified group of basic policies and general proposals for the physical de- velopment of the Borough for the use of Borough Council in governing the affairs of the community. Secondly, after the adoption by Borough Council, the Comprehensive Plan will enable Council, the Planning Commission, and the citizens to review any current issues and proposals against a clear picture of what has been decided as the most de- sirable plan for the future physical development and the future character of the Borough. Thirdly, through the Comprehensive Plan, the Borough presents a clear picture of its long range and general policies on community development to all other persons concerned with development. Fourth, the Comprehensive Plan enables Borough Council to receive the counsel of the Planning Commission in logical and unified form. Fifth, the Comprehensive Plan helps to educate everyone who reads it as to the conditions, prob- lems, and opportunities; the possibilities of the future; the present status and projected future trends; and the operations of the government with respect to physical development. -6- (4) Effectuation: Action programs will be initiated as the result of proposals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Referral to the Comprehensive Plan will be made by Borough Council, Planning Commission, citizens, and others - to provide a comprehensive basis for the eval- uation of proposals affecting physical development." -7- II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT To provide a clearer perspective on land use and develop- ment considerations, it is extremely useful to examine the past history of a given municipality's growth. In 1966, the Bucks County Planninq Commission provided an excellent land development chronology. The'following are their words. For a time, the settlement which was to become Morris- ville was known as Colvins Ferry. George Washington crossed the river at this point to escape capture by the British in 1776. He set up his headquarters at "Summerseat" during the early part of December of the same year prior to the Battles of Princeton and Tren- ton. Summerseat, located next to the Reiter Elementary School, until recently served as the administration building for the Morrisville School System. Although Summerseat House is a well known historical landmark, the more important legacy is the relatively large num- ber of buildings of fine architectural design. Morrisville was named for Robert Morris, financier of the American Revoluation who, at the peak of his for- tunes, owned about 2,500 acres in the immediate area. During the early days of the Republic, the Morrisville area was under active consideration as a site for the National Capitol. A post office was established at Morrisville in 1795. The village was incorporated as a borough in 1804, at which time the population num- bered about 200 persons. Land Development: During the Nineteenth Century: At the time of incorpo- ration, Morrisville occupied somewhat less than half of the approximately two square miles within the present jurisdiction of the Borough. The original boundaries oo extended from Ridge Avenue on the north at the present Lower Makefield Township line, south to a line running through the borrow pit between Cleveland and Bowling Green Avenues, roughly at right angles to the line of the river. The Borough at that time extended westward roughly to what is now Lafayette Avenue, and its pro- jection southward to Robertson Avenue. -8- Early development of the Borough took place genera:lly between East Palmer Street on the north and Delaware Avenue on the south with relatively little development west of what is now Pennsylvania Avenue. Stores and shops serving the Borough and the nearby farm communi- ties to the west developed along what is now East Bridge Street. However, because of the proximity of downtown Trenton by way of a bridge just to the north of the present Lower Trenton Bridge, Morrisville never contained a regionally significant business district. By the turn of the century, Morrisville contained two important industries, the Tile Works (now the Robert- son Manufacturing Company) and the Vulcanized Rubber Company (now the Vulcanized Rubber and Plastics Com- pany). Both were dependent upon railroad spurs from the adjacent Pennsylvania Railroad. Early Twentieth Century: In 1900 Morrisville was a quiet residential suburb of Trenton with somewhat less than 1,400 population. The Borough continuedto grow with residential development extending north of the old town center and west of the Delaware Canal in the direction of Trenton Avenue. The pace of development was greatly accelerated by the establishment of streetcar lines crossing the Delaware from Trenton by way of the Calhoun Street Bridge, par- ticularly the line extending south from Trenton Avenue along Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Avenues to Tully- town and Bristol. This boom in residential development was to last, with only minor interruptions, from before the first World War righ-1C. through the 1920's. The area two and three blocks deep along both sides of North Pennsylvania Avenue was developed in substantial middle income houses at this time. The Morris Heights Section, north of Trenton Avenue was also developed dur- ing this time. Just before and just after the first World War, residential building was also pushing west- ward along West Bridge Street past Lafayette Avenue into what was then Falls Township. West of Pennsyl- vania and south of Philadelphia Avenues, modest single family detached housing interspersed with small semi- detached housing and row houses was constructed. Some of the housing on "the island", extending north from East Bridge Street into what is now Williamson Park, also dates from this pre-World War I and early post war period. 10 The Borough's boundaries remained fixed from its in- corporation in 1804 until 1918, when a large number of properties, many of them farms south and west of the Borough, were annexed. This annexation extended the Borough westward between Trenton Avenue and Bridge Street to include the Gindin Tract (Highland Park), Washington Heights, and Chedester Manor. South of Bridge Street the 1918 annexation extended the Borough to its present boundaries on the south and west@. This single very large annexation included a number of developed and partially developed subdivisions in Falls Township. This helps to explain the disjointed street systems in the Issac Wood Estate, Manor Park, Chedester Manor, and Riverview Estates. Poor circulation between individual subdivisions and very difficult north-south movement within the Borough west of Lafayette Avenue is the legacy of this uncoordinated development. The two borrow pits on either side of Pennsylvania Ave- nue in the Fourth Ward were excavated for their' sand and gravel following World War I. They are currently used for dumping rubbish and have a blighting effect on the residential development around them. The Great Depression of the 1930's left its mark not only upon the people, but also upon the ground in Morrisville. The Highland Park development went into bankruptcy in 1934 when it was only about half built. After remaining vacant for over twenty years, a large number of the undeveloped lots on the west side of Hamilton Boulevard were acquired by the Morrisville School District, and the new high school was built on the site in 1958. A number of the lots off Trenton Avenue were sold for the Lincoln Arms apartments at about the same time. The Washington Heights subdivision between West Palmer and West Bridge Streets went into bankruptcy in 1939. This explains why the subdivision contains pre-World War II houses on some lots and post-war housing on 10 others. Grandview Estates was recorded in 1954 in Falls Town- ship and about 350 small single family houses were built. Difficulties developed, and the Federal Housing oo _10- Administration foreclosed on the project after only about ten percent of the houses were sold. F.H.A. redesigned the heating systems in the houses and put the houses back on the market. The development, plus additional undeveloped land west of the subdivision, was annexed to Morrisville by court order in 1956. Many of the Grandview Estates houses were vacant for a number of years. However, most of the homes have now been sold. In 1962 the Borough annexed a small area bordering on Nolan Avenue just off Trenton Avenue, known as the English Tract. This action reduced the size of one of three pockets of land along Trenton Avenue under the jurisdiction of Falls Township. Since 1965, land development in the Borough has been characterized by the conversion of single family resi- dences into multi-family duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes. There have also been some garden apart- ments built on smaller tracts of vacant land. Transportation Influences: Both the availability and physical location of transporta- tion facilities have played an important role in shaping the land development patterns within the Borough. Some of these influences have been noted in the 1965 Plan. Immediately following the Revolutionary War, as many as three ferrys provided river crossings between Trenton and Morrisville, fording the Delaware River in much the same manner as did Washington during the War. During those early days, goods and travelers journeyed via the Delaware River to and from Philadelphia. The river was the desired travel route due to the relatively poor condi- tion of overland trails to and from Philadelphia. Not surprising is the fact that the early limits of the Borough did not exceed far beyond the banks of the Delaware River. The early and mid-1800's gave rise to new transportation developments and the inherent expansion of Borough bounda- ries. First, the Decatur Street Bridge, then later the _11- Calhoun Street Bridge, provided improved links to Trenton, New Jersey. A turnpike, completed in 1813, provided a further improvement in land transportation and linked Morrisville to towns and settlements to the south and west. The Delaware Canal, completed in 1832, provided a freight link (specifically coal) between Easton and Bristol. The Pennsylvania Railroad was extended through Morrisville in 1833, and provided still another impetus for land develop- ment in the Borough. While the Borough was being influenced by an expanding and advancing transportation system during the 19th Century, its population grew slowly but steadily. In marked contrast, the first thirty years of the 20th Century witnessed rapid population growth in the Borough. During the period, trol- ley lines linked the Borough with Trenton, New Jersey, and with towns immediately to the north. The Lincoln Highway, connecting New York City and San Francisco, was completed also during this time. During the next thirty years the Borough would witness addi- tional improvements in land-based transportation systems, particularly interstate highway networks, culminating in the opening of U.S. Route 1. For a time, U.S. Route 1 in- cluded Bridge Street, as well as the Lower Trenton Bridge. Both U.S. Route 1 and the Amtrak Railroad Line maintain an overwhelming physical presence in the Borough. In fact, they form a physical barrier separating the South Morris- ville section from the remainder of the municipality. Not surprising is the fact that industrial and related uses are dominant along this same corridor. one lasting influence upon land development within the Borough continues to be its regional location, and in par- ticular, its proximity to Trenton. Mercer County and Trenton continue to be important business and employment centers for Borough residents. Lower Bucks municipalities also provide employment centers for Borough residents. Earlier trends marked by a shift of manufacturing employ- ment away from Morrisville and Trenton to other Lower Bucks County and Mercer County municipalities is expected to con- tinue. The extent to which Trenton and Morrisville en- courage the development of businesses to service these man- ufacturers, and those employed by them, may be a key to their future strength. 14 01 -12- III. POPULATION An analysis of the Borough of Morrisville's population continues to be a valuable tool in decision making pertain- ing to future land use. The population of the Borough appears to have peaked in 1970 when a total of 11,309 persons resided in the Borough. A 12.9% decline in population has been registered for the period 1970 to 1980. Recently released 1980 Census data on population shows that population of the Borough stood at 9,945 persons. Table 3.1 shows that in 1980 the Borough registered a population decline for the first time in one hundred forty years. TABLE 3.1 POPULATION OF MORRISVILLE BOROUGH 1910 TO 1980 Change Over Preceeding Census Year Population Number Percent 1810 261 0 0 1820 391 130 50.0% 1830 531 140 35.8% 1840 405 -126 -23.7% 00 1850 565 160 39.5% 1860 784 219 38.8% 1870 813 29 3.7% 1880 968 155 19.1% 1890 1,203 235 24.2% 1900 1,371 168 14.0% 1910 2,002 631 46.0% 1920 3,639 1,637 81.8% 1930 5,368 1,729 47.5% 1940 5,493 126 @2.3% 1950 6,787 1,294 23.6% 1960 7,790 1,003 14.8% oo 1970 11,309 3,519 45.1% 1980 9,845 -1,464 -12.9% Sources: Comprehensive Plan, Borough of Morrisville, Bucks County. Bucks County Planning Commission. Septem- ber, 1966. 1980 Census of Population and Housing: Pennsyl- v '9_ nia Advance Reports. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, March, 1981. -13- While Morrisville Borough has exhibited a decline in popu- lation of 12.9% in the period from 1970 to 1980, the Town- ship of Lower Makefield, as well as Falls, has exhibited population increases of 17.2% and .6% respectively. Addi- tionally, Bucks County exhibited an increase in population of 15% during this same period. Table 3.2shows the popula- tion changes in these several municipalities. TABLE 3. 2 POPULATION CHANGE SELECTED PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPALITIES AND BUCKS COUNTY 1970 TO 1980 Population Change Municipality 1970 1980 Number Percent Falls Township 35,850 36,083 233 .6% Lower Makefield Township 14,804 17,351 2,547 17.2% Morrisville 11,309 9,845 -1,464 -12.9% Bucks County 416,728 479,211 62,483 15.0% Source: 1980 Census of Population and Housing: Pennsyl- vania Advance Reports. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, March, 1981. Trenton, New Jersey, lost almost an identical percentage of its population as did Morrisville from 1970 to 1980. This population loss occurred as the surrounding municipalities experienced population growth. Table 3.3shows the parallel population changes in these several New Jersey municipali- ties. TABLE 3.3 POPULATION CHANGE SELECTED NEW JERSEY MUNICIPALITIES AND MERCER COUNTY 1970 TO 1980 Population Change Municipality 1970 1980 Number Percent Ewing Township 32,831 34,842 2,011 6.1% Hopewell Township 10,030 10,893 863 8.6% Trenton 104,786 92,124 -12,662 -12.1% Mercer County 304,116 307,863 3,747 1.2% Source: 1980 Census of Population and Housing: New Jersey Tdvance Reports. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, March, 1981. -14- Both Morrisville and Trenton continue to compete with out- lying townships in offering residences. They do not appear to be competing as much with their immediate neighbors, but compete now with the more rural townships. The extent to which Morrisville can provide an attractive living environ- ment to prospective and existing residents will determine whether or not it continues to lose the competition. Age Distribution: Changes in the age composition of the Borough's population between 1970 and 1980 are also worthy of mention. Persons under the age of 5 years have declined by 34%. In 1980, 663 persons under the age of 5 years were recorded in the Borough, down from a total of 1,017 such persons in 1970. The number of persons in the 5 to 17 age group declined by 28%. There were 1,894 such persons recorded in 1980, down from 2,636 in 1970. Persons age 18 to 64 years declined during this same period, but only by 9%. In 1980, 6,108 persons in this age bracket were recorded, down from 7,769 such persons in 1970. Particularly worthy of mention is the fact that the Borough recorded a 23% increase in the number of persons age 65 years and over from the period 1970 to 1980. A total of 1,180 such persons resided in the Borough in 1980, up from 957 such persons in 1970. Table 3.4 tracks the changes in Population Age Composition and Fertility Rates over the last forty years in the Bor- ough. Interesting to note is the fact that the percentage of the total population aged 65 and over has nearly doubled in forty years. The percentage of pre-school children and female fertility rates have dropped to or below 1940 levels. TABLE 3.4 AGE COMPOSITION AND FERTILITY RATES MORRISVILLE BOROUGH 1940 to 1980 AGE COMPOSITION: 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 0 to 4 Pre-Sc hool 367 6.7% 681 10.0% 718 9.2% 1,017 9.0% 663 6.7% 5 to 19 School Age 1,383 25.2% 1,357 20.0% 1,903 24.4% 2,837 25.0% 2,223 22.6% 20 to 64 Labor Force 3,390 61 6% 4,189 61.8% 4,388 56.4% 6,498 57.5% 5,779 53.7% 65 and Over Retirement 353 6.5% 560 8.2% 781 10.0% 957 8.5% 1,180 12.0% _______ ______ _______ ______ _______ _______ ______ _______ _______ _______ 5,493 100.0% 6,787 100.0% 7,790 100.0% 11,309 100.0% 9,845 100.0 FERTILITY RATES: 1940 1950 1960 1960 1980 Children 0 to 4 367 681 718 1,017 663 Females 20 to 44 1,082 1,406 1,332 2,093 1,835 Children Per 1,000 Females 339 484 539 486 361 Sources; Comprehensive Plan, Borough of Morrisville, Bucks County. Bucks County Planning Commission. September, 1966. U.S. Census General Characteristics of the Population 1970 - Philadelphia, Pa. - N.J. SMSA. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1972. Morrisville Profile - Characteristics of Persons - 1980 Census of Population. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. Regional Information Services Center. July, 1982 -15- Morrisville's shrinking and aging population, a conclusion supported by the preceding data, will have their effects on community facilities in the future. These effects and the actions necessitated by them, will be outlined in later sections of this plan. Household and Family Characteristics: To be expected with any population decrease, is an accompany- ing decrease in the number of families residing in the Borough. To be sure, an 11% decrease in the number of fami- lies occurred from 1970 to 1980. Dramatic changes in the marital status of residents occurred within the Borough during this same period. The number of married persons residing in the Borough declined from 5,578 in 1970 to 4,419,in 1980, representing a 21% decrease. Separations and divorces increased by 46% and 86%, respective- ly, during the decade. The number of widowed persons declined from 815 in 1970 to 637 in 1980. This represented an overall decrease of 22%. Additionally, the number of married couple families was re- duced from 2,608 such families in 1970 to 2,154 in 1980, a 17% decline. Female-headed households increased from 285 in 1970 to 346 such households in 1980. Social and Economic Characteristics: Educational attainment, occupation and income level are con- sidered to be reliable indicators of socioeconomic character- istics in a given municipality. These indicators, coupled with the previous data, can provide an even clearer under- standing of the present conditions in Morrisville. Unfor- tunately, socioeconomic characteristics derived from the 1980 Census are not yet available. However, the 1970 Census will provide some update of the material provided in the pre- vious plan. TABLE 3.5EDUCATION ATTAINMENT CHARACTERISTICS FOR PERSONS AGED 25 AND OVER 1960 TO 1970 Median Percent Percent School Years Median School High School High School Completed Years Completed Graduates Graduates Trenton J.-Pa. 1960 1970 1960 1970 Urbaniz@d%rea: 9.0 11.9 18.0% 49.4% Bucks County; 11.6 12.3 29.5% 58.9% Morrisville: 10.7 12.1 27.1% 55.2% Source: Cam ruhgngi=vei:jj0nn.Borou hmo Bucks County. Bucks County Pmn Scg@ '! Morrisville, r, lVbb. General Social and Economic Characteristics - P:;7si lvania 1970 Census U.S. Department ot Conunerce. M 972 . -16- As Table3.5 shows, a marked improvement in educational at- tainment occurred in Morrisville during the decade. The percentage of those persons age 25 and over who graduated from high school doubled. Occupation, as stated in the previous Comprehensive Plan, is yet another indicator of socioeconomic characteristics. Table3.6 provides information concerning the rate per thousand persons employed in various occupations in both Bucks County and Morrisville in both 1960 and 1970 (1980 data is presently unavailable). TABLE 3.6 NUMBER OF PERSONS BY OCCUPATION PER THOUSAND EMPLOYED 1960 TO 1970 Bucks County Morrisville 1960 1970 1960 1970 1. Operatives: 215 159 242 158 2. Craftsmen and Foremen: 188 131 174 116 3. Clerical: 134 225 156 260 4. Professional and Technical: 130 165 94 174 5. Managers and Proprietors: 91 70 71 62 6. Sales: 76 78 52 69 7. Service Workers: 70 100 75 102 8. Laborers: 52 32 73 33 9. Other: 44 40 63 26 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Sources: Comprehensive Plan, Borough of Morrisville, Bucks County. Bucks County Planning Commission, Septem- ber 1966. 1970 Census of Population General Social and Economic Characteristics - Pennsylvania. U.S. Table 3.6 shows a marked decrease in the rate per thousand of operatives and craftsmen in both Morrisville and Bucks County during the ten year period. Laborers experienced similar ce- creases. The rate per thousand of clerical workers increased considerably from 1960 to 1970. Professional and technical 00 workers also experienced increases in the rate of incidence; with the rate nearly doubling in Morrisville by 1970. The rate of incidence of service workers per thousand employed also increased slightly during the decade. -17- Income: Income data are often used as a variable to describe socio- economic characteristics of a municipality. In Morrisville, the median family income increased by $2,287, from 1959 to 1969. Median family income was $6,559 in 1959 and $8,886 in 1969. If adjusted for inflation, however, there appears to be little or no real growth in median fami- ly income. Table3.7 shows the percentage of families earning incomes in certain specific ranges in Morrisville in 1959 and 1969. TABLE 3. 7 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF FAMILIES BY SIZE OF INCOME MORRISVILLE BOROUGH 1959 TO 1969 Income Range Under $4,000 $7,000 $10,000 $15 , 00 0 $ 2 5 , 000 Year $4,000 -$6,999 -$ 9 , 9 9 9 -$ 14 , 9 99 -$24,999 Or More 1959 14.0% 42.6% 23.9% 15.1% 3.6% 0.8% 1969 7.7% 13.1% 24.0% 35.0% 18.0% 3.2% Sources: Comprehensive Plan, Borough of Morrisville, Bucks County. Bucks County Planning Commission, Septem- ber, 1966. 1970 Census of Population General Social and Economic Characteristics - Pennsylvania. U.S. De- partment of Commerce, May, 1972. outwardly significant is the shift of families to upper in- come ranges and the growth in the percentage of families whose incomes exceed $15,000. once again, if adjustments are made for inflation, real growth is suspect. Population Projections: As noted in the earlier Comprehensive Plan prepared by the Bucks County Planning Commission, the large tracts of devel- opable land were built upon by 1960. Garden apartment con- struction and single family dwelling conversion during the sixties accounted largely for the increase in the Borough's population by 1970. -18- The difficulty and uncertainty in making population projec- tions is readily acknowledged. However, two agencies have provided projections of future population in Morrisville. They do differ in their respective conclusions. In 1977 the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, as part of the Year 2000 Transportation Plan, forecast that by the year 2000 the population of the Borough would stand at 11,000 persons. This projection was based primarily on the rates of growth between the 1960 and 1970 Census, with- out the benefit of 1980 Census information. The Pennsyl- vania Department of Environmental Resources, as reported to the Bucks County Planning Commission, has projected that Morrisville's population at 9,573 persons in 1990 and 9,228 persons by the year 2000. Based upon 1980 Census information cited earlier regarding declines in the pre-school and school-aged population and the "built" character of the land use, the latter projec- tion is believed to be the more reasonable expectation. The Borough of Morrisville will more than likely follow-the trend of older urban communities and concentrate their efforts on developing strategies aimed at population stabil- ization rather than at population growth. _19- IV. ECONOMIC BASE Commercial (including retail) and industrial establishments form the economic base of any community, and it is extreme- ly important that any community recognize any changes that have occurred within that base. This recognition can in- fluence the future planning effort and assist decision makers in land development deliberations. Industrial Base: Table 4. 1 provides information concerning the number of in- dustrial establishments and employees by Standard Industrial Classification, listing a Morrisville address in 1975. TABLE4.1 INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS AND EMPLOYEES WITH MORRISVILLE ADDRESS 1 975 Number Of Number Of S.I.C. Establishments Employees Wet Corn Milling 1 211 Wood Kitchen Cabinets 1 1 Commercial Printing 1 1 Bookbinding 1 11 Industrial Gases 1 7 Chemicals/Chemical Preparation 1 49 Industrial Inorganic Chemicals 1 198 Fabricated Rubber Products 4 392 Miscellaneous Plastics 3 200 Ceramic Tile 1 201 Pottery Products 1 17 Concrete Block/Brick 3 252 Machine Tools - Metal Forming 2 15 Machinery (except Electrical) 1 4 Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 1 1 Sporting and Athletic Goods 1 57 TOTALS: 24 1,617 Source: 1975 Pennsylvania Industrial Directory. Common- wealth of Pennsylvania, 1975. -20- 14 Table 4.2 provides similar information by Standard Indus- trial Classification for 1979. TABLE 4.2 INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS AND EMPLOYEES WITH MORRISVILLE ADDRESS 1979 Number Of Number Of S.I.C. Establishments Employees Wet Corn Milling 1 226 Wood Kitchen Cabinets 2 2 Commercial Printing 4 19 Bookbinding 1 9 Industrial Inorganic Chemicals 1 185 Chemicals/Chemical Preparation 1 89 Fabricated Rubber Products 4 413 Miscellaneous Plastics 2 75 Ceramic Tile 1 175 Concrete Block/Brick 2 77 Ready Mix Concrete 1 37 Fabricated Metal Products 1 3 Machine Tools - Metal Forming 2 15 Machinery (except Electrical) 1 4 Sporting & Athletic Goods 1 39 Costume Jewelry 1 10 TOTALS: 26 1,378 Source: 1979 Pennsylvania Industrial Directory, Common- wealth of Pennsylvania, 1975. Industrial Expansion: As stated in the 1966 Comprehensive Plan, trends in capital expenditures, wages and salaries, value of production, and value added by manufacture are often used to evaluate the strength of a community's industrial base. Capital expenditure is defined as the cost of physical plant and that equipment purchased for replacement purposes, as well as for additions to productive capacity. The amount spent on capital expenditures is indicative of a private firm's analysis of what is needed to keep an up-to-date physical plant. Wages and salaries are the gross annual earnings of em- ployees on the payroll. The amount of wages and salaries 10, -21- o@ paid over a period of years reflects the growth or contrac- tion of an industry's or group of industries' ability to support the local labor force. On the whole, an increase in wages and salaries leads to a better compensated labor force, who in turn has more disposable income with which to buy more consumer goods. Value of production is defined as the net selling value of production, excluding freight charges and excise tax. This variable measures the income of an industry. Since profits are determined as a percentage of total income, the value of production variable may be used to estimate growth. A rise in value of production is indicative of a healthy economy. Value Added by Manufacture is a measure derived by'subtract- ing the total cost of raw and semi-finished materials from the total value of production. Value added by manufacture measures, to a great extent, the amount of production re- lated employment occuring in the industry. A rise in value of production can be indicative of a healthy economy- Table 4.3 shows the trends in these economic indices for Morrisville manufacturing industries for the years 1960, 1964, and 1977. TABLE 4.3ECONOMIC INDICES FOR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES MORRISVILLE BOROUGH - 1960, 1964, 1977 Number Value Added of Capital Number of Wages and Value of of Year Plants Expenditures Employees Salaries Production Manufacturer 1960 21 $ 350,600 973 $ 5,313,000 $ 16,891,500 $ 9,187,600 1964 20 $ 1,002,600 925 $ 5,774,200 $ 13,971,600 $ 8,680,300 1977 26 $ 2,880,000 1,563 $22,322,000 $181,278,000 $74,277,000 Sources: Comprehensive Plan, Borough of Morrisville, Bucks County. Bucks county Planning commission, September, 1966. 1979 Pennsylvania County Industry Report, Bucks County. Common- wealth ot Pennsylvania, 1979. -22- The preceding Tables show a rather steady but narrow in- dustrial base in Morrisville. But, that industrial base cannot and does not support the entire labor force. The Borough continues to rely upon industrial employers in surrounding townships (particularly Falls Township) to pro- vide employment for its work force. Work force reductions such as those recently announced at U.S. Steel's Fairless Works, and recent plant closings at the Vulcanized Rubber and Plastics Company and the Robertson- American Corporation, will undoubtedly weaken the Borough's industrial base for the forseeable future. Commercial Base: Significant changes have also occurred in the retail sector of the Borough. During the first forty years of the 20th Century, retail establishments were for the most part lo- cated on Bridge Street. Although modest by today's stan- dards, a supermarket and a retail clothing store @rovided two anchors which supported additional smaller shops on Bridge Street. Continued population out-migration was largely responsible for the development of the Morrisville Shopping Center on Trenton Avenue during the 1950's and the Pennsbury Plaza Shopping Center during the 1960's. These two shopping cen- ters at first competed directly with the retail businesses located on Bridge Street. Soon, however, the competition pro-ved too great, and the Bridge Street commercial area was transformed from a retail center to largely a service oriented shopping center. It does appear that both the number and sales volume of retail trade establishments has been rather stable during the past twenty-five years. Table 4.4 presents data on retail activity in Morrisville for selected years; 1954, 1958, and 1977. -23- TABLE 4.4 RETAIL TRADE STATISTICS MORRISVILLE BOROUGH 1954, 1958, 1977 Number of Total Sales Paid Year Establishments ($11000) Employees 1954 106 $13,003 N.A. 1958 98 $15,238 565 1977 119 $35,346 762 N.A.: Not Available. Sources: Facts and Figures, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Bucks County Planning Commission, 1959. 1977 Census of Retail Trade - Pennsylvania. U.S. Department of Commerce, August, 1979. While retail trade has remained relatively consta@t'in Morrisville during this period, it has grown dramatically in other Lower Bucks County municipalities. Table 4.-.5 reveals the magnitude of the change. TAB,LE 4. 5 RETAIL TRADE STATISTICS SELECTED LOWER BUCKS MUNICIPALITIES 1958 - 1977 Number of Total Sales Establishments (000's) Employees Municipality 1958 1977 1@58 1977 1958 1977 Falls Township 40 218'. $ 9,853 $119,322 410 2,189 Middletown Township 30 128 $37,790 $128,220 640 2,542 Bristol Township 75 271 $ 7,538 $141,041 295 2,253 MORRISVILLE ]BOROUGH 98 119 $15,238 $ 35,346 565 762 Sources: Facts and Figures, Bucks Countv, Pennsylvania. Bucks County Planning Commission, 1959. 1977 Census of Retail Trade - Pennsvlvania. U.S. Department of Commerce, August, 1979. -24- As the preceding Table evidences, 'continued population out- migration to outlying townships has impacted heavily on Morrisville's commercial base. The Bridge Street/Pennsyl- vania Avenue District, once Morrisville's only community shopping facility, has become more neighborhood and service oriented. It is struggling to continue to perform this function. The relocation of the Post Office (to Falls Town- ship) is an example of the shift from the Bridge Street/ Pennsylvania Avenue area. For a time, the Morrisville Shopping Center replaced the Bridge Street/Pennsylvania Avenue District as Morrisville's community shopping facility. The loss of the Lits Depart- ment Store from that center has heralded its gradual tran- si-tion from a community shopping center to more of a neighborhood orientation. Clearly, the Pennsbury Plaza has become the dominant com- munity retail center in the Borough. With, among other tenants, two banks, two food markets, two pharmaci.es, a theater and a variety store, it now overshadows the other retail centers. Also, one cannot ignore the influence of the Oxford Valley Mall located in Langhorne. This regional shopping center will continue to draw more shoppers to it due to its attractiveness, convenience, and variety in shoppers goods.' -25- Financial Base: Just as important an element of the Comprehensive Plan is information regarding the costs of governmental services and the revenues needed to provide those services. Sources of Revenue The Borough derives its revenue from taxes, permit and license fees, user fees and fines. Table 4. 6 on page 27 shows the total receipts for 1981 and anticipated re- ceipts for 1982. As shown, Real Estate levies account for 58.5 percent of the total 1982 revenues, down from 62.6 of total revenues in 1981. However, both percentages are considerably higher than in 1960 when Real Estate taxes accounted for $147,222 of the total $347,339 in revenues, (42.3 percent). Expenditures Government services are necessary to the continued well- being of any community. Table 4.7 shows the categories of expenditure for Borough revenues in both 1981 and 1982. Table 4.7 appears on page 28. -26- P4 TABLE 4.6 BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE GENERAL REVENUES 1981 - 1982 RECEIPTS GENERAL BOROUGH: BUDGET-1981 BUDGET-1982 Cash Balance $ 24,500.00 $ 75,000.00 Taxes - Real Estate 505,414.00 511,353.00 Taxes - Per Capita 52,000.00 52,000.00 Taxes - Prior Years 25,000.00 26,500.00 Transfer Tax 24,000.00 20,000.00 Building Permits and Street Fees 4,500.00 4,000.00 Use and Occupancy Permits 3,000.00 2,500.00 Plumbers and Contractors Licenses & Fees 4,000.00 3,500.00 Coin Machines 4,000.00 3,500.00 Deeds Recorded 1,000.00 900.00 Peddlers Registrations 100.00 100.00 Traffic Fines 31,000.00 32,000.00 Truck Overweight Fines 10,000.00 12,000.00 Ordinance Fines 9,000.00 �,000.00 Parking Fines 7,000.00 5,200.00 Parking Meter Collections 3,500.00 3,000.00 Police - Miscellaneous Receipts 2,000.00 2,500.00 State Reimbursement for Police School - 00 2,500.00 Commonwealth of PA.-State Police Fines 4,000.00 5,500.00 County Aid 1,720.00 1,720.00 Beverage Licenses 2,450.00 2,450.00 Public Utility Tax 5,300.00 5,100.00 Commonwealth of PA. - Snow Removal 3,454.00 3,700.00 Morrisville School District 7,500.00 6,300.00 School's Share of Recreation Program 1,000.00 1,000.00 Reimbursement - Tax Collector 5,300.00 5,@00.00 Interest - Williamson Park 600.00 600.00 Interest on Investments 10,000-.00 18,000.00 Miscellaneous 8,500.00 8,500.00 Oxford Valley Cablevision 3,000.00 3,300.00 Dumping Charges 41,472.00 44,500.00 Reimbursement for fuel & electric (Sr. Cit.) 2,000.00 2,000.00 Petty Cash Return - 100.00 100.00 TOTAL GENERAL BOROUGH RECEIPTS: $806,410.00 $873,623.00 Source: Borough of Morrisville 1982 Budget. Adopted December 15, 1982. -27- TABLE 4.7 BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE GENERAL EXPENDITURES 1981 - 1982 EXPENDITURES - GENERAL BOROUGH: BUDGET-1981 BUDGET-1982 Administration $259,278.00 $289,587.00 Police 301,393.00 328,635.00 Streets 66,619.00 39,860.00 Sanitation 44,380.00 57,324.00 Public Property and Equipment 101,288.00 122,395.00 Miscellaneous Departments 6,600.00 13,600.00 TOTAL GENERAL BOROUGH EXPENDITURES $779,588.00 $851,401.00 Perhaps the most noteworthy increase in a particular ex- penditure category is in the area of police/public safety. Costs, as anticipated in 1982, have increased by 400% over 1960. To the Borough's credit, is the fact that budget surplus in the amount of $26,852 occurred in 1981 and another sur- plus in the amount of $22,222 is anticipated in 1982. -28- V. LAND USE As noted in an earlier section of this document, the Borough of Morrisville has traditionally been a residential community. Large tracts of land within the Borough were developed for single family houses, the last such tract being the Grandview Estates annexation. Since that time, residential development has been marked, first, by garden apartment construction and, second, by single family dwelling conversions to-multi-family dwellings. This phenomenon of conversions is readily evidenced by recent housing statisti'cs. Table5. lcompares 1970 and 1980 Census Data relevant to year-round housing units by the number of rooms. TABLE 5.1 YEAR-ROUND HOUSING UNITS BY ROOMS MORRISVILLE 1970-1980 No. of Rooms 1970 1980 1 Room 43 62 2 Rooms 73 63 3 Rooms 460 465 4 Rooms 856 694 5 Rooms 856 787 6 Rooms 1,692 1,847 Sources: 1970 Census of Housing, Detailed Housing Character- tics-Pennsylvania. U.S. Department of Commerce, May, 1972. Morrisville Profile-Characteristics of Housing Units-1980 Census of Housing. Delaware Valley K-e-gional Planning Commission. Regional Information and Services Center, July, 1982 -29- A. Existing Land Uses The Land Use Map on the next page graphically illustrates the continued predominance of residential land use within the Borough. Table5-.2 provides information on the total amount and percentage of each category of land use in the Borough. Individual parcel land uses were established utilizing base data provided by the Bucks County Planning Commission and field verifications (and in some cases corrections) by the Consultant. TABLE 5.2 Existing Land Use-Acreage/Percent Borough of Morrisville 1982 Percent oi Classification Acreage Total Residential 454.4 40.9 Commercial & Predominantly Commercial 56.0 5.0 Public/Semi-Public 181.4 16.3 Industrial 69.9 6.2 Railroad 48.7 4.4 Public R.O.W. 251.7 22.6 Vacant Land 51.2 4.6 TOTALS: 1113.3 100% -30- ... . . ...... Residential Uses The dominant land use (40.9) in Morrisville remains resi- dential and includes single family, semi-detached, row housing and apartments. General Housing Characteristics Some changes have occurred with regard to housing charac- teristics and they are worthy of mention. Tenure As noted in the previous Comprehensive Plan, 68.1 percent of the housing units in Morrisville were owner-occupied and 31.9 percent were renter-occupied in 1960. The 1970 Census data for the Borough reveals that 60.3 percent of the units were owner-occupied and 39.7 percent were renter-occupied. This downward trend in the number of owner-occupied units has been reversed. The 1980 Census shows the mix of owner versus renter-occupied to be 62 percent and 38 percent, respectively. Age/Condition Table5.3 shows the number and percent of the total housing units constructed during various years. TABLE 5.3 YEAR ROUND HOUSING UNITS BY YEAR BUILD MORRISVILLE BOROUGH - 1970 Construction Period Number Percent 1969 to 1970 10 .2 1965 to 1968 418 10.8 1960 to 1964 572 15.0 1950 to 1959 975 25.3 1940 to 1949 450 11.7 1939 or earlier 1427 37.0 Source: 1970 Census of Housing, Detailed Housing @!haracteristice-Pennsylvania. U.S. Department of Commerce. May, 1972. -32- Significant is the fact tha the percentage of units built prior to 1939 declined from 57 percent in 1960 to 37 percent in 1970, (Note: 1980 Census Detailed Housing Characteristics not yet available). With regard to condition, the number of occupied housing units lacking plumbing facilities for exclu- sive use has risen from 32 in 1970 to 41 in 1980. The total number of vacai@_t year-round Housing units has nearly doubled from 100 in 1970 to 193 in 1980. The number of renter units vacant for more than two months increased from 15 in 1970 to 97 in 1980. The number of owner units @ih__ich Fa-ve been-vacant and for sale for more than six months, have increased from 3 in 1970 to 13 in 1980. Median Value of Housing The median value of owner-occupied housing in Morris- ville increased from $13,725 in 1970 to $43,6.00 in 1980. Commercial Uses The Land Map on page 31 and Table5-.2 show the location and extent of Morrisville's Commercial Land Use. Such uses include retail shopping centers located on East and West Trenton Avenue and the old East Bridge Street/Pennsylvania Avenue area. offices and banks have increasingly become concentrated along East and West Trenton Avenue. Auto- motive uses have become concentrated south of Bridge Street. Industrial Uses Some 69.9 acres of industrial land exist within the Borough and industrial uses continue to be concentrated south of Bridge Street. Noteworthy is the fact that acreage occupied -33- by General Refractories Company on Post Road, Robertson- American Corporation, and Vulcanized Rubber and Plastics Company is now under utilized. Public/Semi-Public The Borough, County, and other agencies and organizations have aggressively worked to increase the quality and quantity of community facilities while experiencing fiscal pressures. These facilities will be discussed in Section Vi. Railroad Cutting a swath and creating a physical barrier in the middle of Morrisville is 48.7 acres of railroad land. ConRail freight spurs serve industries such as Staley Products and a high speed Amtrak commuter line links New York, Trenton, and Philadelphia. Public Rights-of-Way A total of 251.7 acres of Borough land is considered a street or highway. Bridge Street, U.S. 1 and Trenton Avenue link Morrisville with Trenton. The map on page 35 shows 19.75 Average Daily Traffic Volumes for certain highways and streets within and near Morrisville. -34- tv 10 -4 21000 3 Z 3900 25 @VOR7',IV Y -,o4 6 4@0, 16200 00 3100 U3 1180 990 :1300 26NO <' MOR R IS V I LLE 6600 7300 12300 2300 2000 09022 4300 '17300 9300 7800 MOO 4300 9000 Z 10400 9700 31000 al 2400 21000 5" 19000 2 6400 3300 6100 311A 03621 @4QOO 25000 13 20000 24000 14700 10100 s, 13700 o Fallsington Oj,3C 11000 091-?6 9500 9800 2400 13 22600 1900 - 09151 4500 3250 Traf f ic Volumes 16700 SOURCE: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 1975. nD LIK MORRISVILLE BOROUGH Bucks County, Pennsylvania Aar 1mile -35- Vacant Land There are a total of 51.2 acres of vacant land within the Borough. Generally, the larger vacant tracts are located South of Bridge Street. With the exception of the triangular parcel of land bounded by U.S. Route 1 to the north and Falls Township to the west, which is owned by Conrail, the majority of the remaining vacant lands in the Borough are privately owned, primarily by industries. Land Use Projections The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources has projected that certain land uses will change during the thirty year period between 1970 and 2000. They project that Morrisville Borough will experience an increase in*residen- tial land use of 21.3 acres and an increase in commercial land use of 16.3 acres. They project a decline of 2 acres in industrial acreage. Table5.4 presents projected land use changes in o@her Coastal Zone Study Areas in Bucks County and for the County itself. TABLE 5.4 CHANGE IN LAND USE ACREAGE 1970-2000 BUCKS COUNTY COASTAL ZONE COMMUNITIES Commercial Land Use Municipality Residential Industrial and Services Totals Bensalem 692.5 -34 216.7 875.2 Bristol Boro 131.8 -7 23.7 148.5 Bristol Twp. 400.8 54.7 161.1 507.2 Tullytown 170.2 1.6 30.2 202 Falls 140.3 30.3 82.5 253.1 Morrisville 21.3 -2 16.3 35.6 TOTALS 1556.9 -65.8 530.5 2021.6 Source: Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Management Program fe-cfi-Hical Record. Draft. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Decamber, 1978. -36- B. Density Density, or intensity of building activity per acre of land area, should continue to be monitored. Density regulations as contained in the Borough of Morrisville Zoning Ordinance of 1980 are incorporated F-erein by reference. C. Physical Characteristics Of The Land Characteristics relating to ground water resources topo- graphy soil conditions and soil types were quite adequately discussed in the 1966 Comprehensive Plan-Morrisville Borough. Little or no change has taken place. Therefore this previous discussion is incorporated herein by reference. D. Traffic Highways Morrisville is served directly by a rather extensive network of highways. These highways produce extensive through traffic movements, but they also enhance the attractiveness of the Borough for residential, com- mercial and industrial development. As the map on page 38 shows, there are a number of regional -37- Regional Highway System TRENTO N J MORRISVt PHILADELPHIA RIVE DE'A'IARE MORRISVILLE BOROUGH Bucks County, Pennsylvania 0 3 6 12 Scale in Miles -38- highways which impact on Morrisville. Interstate 95 when complete will link Maine to Florida. At this stage it does at least provide a limited access route from Lawrenceville, New Jersey southward through Lower Bucks County to Philadelphia and beyond. Interstate 295 is now complete from Trenton to Lawrenceville. If, and when, 1-295 is complete south of Trenton to Bordentown, one will be able to travel from Lawrenceville, New Jersey southward to the Delaware Memorial Bridge and intersect Interstate 95 south of Wilmington Delaware. New Jersey Route 29 now links Interstate 295 with Interstate 95 and provides improved movement through Trenton. Portions of U.S. I and the U.S. 1 Realignment remain to be completed in order to link Trenton with Phila- delphia and the Pennsylvania Turnpike. The U.S. 13 and U.S. 1 interchange is complete and major interchange improvements southward on U.S. 13 are now underway. The Cross County Expressway, Burlington-Bristol Bridge Replacement, and the Calhoun Street Bridge Replacement have not yet been undertaken. Local Streets And Roadways Trenton Avenue, Bridge Street, and the Trenton Freeway remain the major east-west arterials. Pennsylvania Avenue remains the primary north-south arterial. West Philadelphia Avenue is still a less traveled east-west arterial. The same can be said of Delmorr Avenue. Traffic Volumes The map on page 35 shows average daily traffic vol- umes for major streets, highways, and bridges in and near Morrisville in 1975. The Trenton Freeway Toll Bridge remained the busiest with an A.D.V. of 26,000 vehicles. The Calhoun Street Bridge was the second- most travelled with an A.D.V. of 21,000 vehicles. The Lower Trenton Bridge reported an A.D.V. of 11,300 vehicles. -39- Existing cartway widths combined with high traffic volumes during peak hours still produce traffic con- gestion on East Bridge Street, North Pennsylvania Avenue, and Trenton Avenue. E. Public Transportation Bus Morrisville is served seven days a week by South- eastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Bus Route 150 which links Morrisville with the high speed commuter train terminal at 12th Street and Market Street in Trenton. Route 150 also travels west on Trenton Avenue to the oxford Valley Mall. The SEPTA Route "B" then links the oxford Valley Mall with Philadelphia. Commuter Rail The Trenton Station is the nearest stop for high speed Amtrak service between New York City and Wash- ington, D.C. and commuter service to Philadelphia. Additional commuter rail service is provided on the West Trenton Line operated by the Southeastern Penn- sylvania Transportation Authority. Trains run almost hourly seven days a week with regular stops at nearby Yardley and Langhorne. Freight Rail A Pennsylvania Railroad Freight rail spur line still serves industries in Morrisville. Staley Manufacturing Company located in South Morrisville is the Borough's largest daily rail user. -40- VI. COMMUNITY FACILITIES Community facilities include such things as schools, parks, playgrounds, churches, hospitals, municipal services, li- braries, fire stations, and utilities. A. Schools: Morrisville still maintains its own school system, pro- viding both elementary and secondary education. Facilities: Currently, three public elementary schools and one high school serve Morrisville. Table6-1 provides descriptive information abo-Ut'the schools. TABLE 6.1 MORRISVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES RiE_A ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS SECONDARY SCHOOL Morrisville M.R. High Descriptions Grandview Manor Park Reiter School Year of Construction: 1957 1975 1958 1959 Year of Additions: 1968 - 1961 - Site Size (in acres): 8.5 1.9 4 20 Gross Floor Area (square feet): 26,000 17,650 33,000 152,470 Source: Less Without Loss: A Comprehensive Study of School Enrollments, f;acilities, and organization. Morri7sville School District, MayT 1981. Enrollment: A continuing decline in public school enrollments has precipitated a major planning action on the part of the Morrisville School District. As Table6. 2shows, public school enrollments have been on a continued downward slide since 1971. The Table -41- also shows that the School District projects this slide to continue. TABLE 6.2 MORRISVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT PAST, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS, K - 12 (1971-1972 to 1990-1991) Elementary Secondary Actual En- Level Level Totals rollments: (K-6) (7-12) (K.- 12) 1971-1972 1,015 916 1,931 1972-1973 994 905 1,899 1973-1974 900 902 1,802 1974-1975 952 896 1,848 1975-1976 923 905 1,828 1976-1977 900 878 1,778 1977-1978 820 914 1,734 1978-1979 778 823 1,601 1979-1980 729 757 1,486 1980-1981 694 744 1,438 Projected Straight* Straight* Straight* Enrollments: Line Line Line 1981-1982 660 733 1,393 1982-1983 607 728 1,335 1983-1984 563 705 1,268 1984-1985 532 645 1,177 1985-1986 490 628 1,118 1986-1987 441 610 1,051 1987-1988 414 589 1,003 1988-1989 397 547 944 1989-1990 387 511 898 1990-1991 387 481 868 *Straight Line: Straight Line projection. The method- ology used by the School District to predict enrollments. .0 Source: Less Without Loss: A Comprehensive Study of Enrollments, Facilities, and Organization. Morrisville School District, May, 1981. -42- Should these projections ring true, and as assumed by the School District at the outset of the study, there is no merger with another district, a phased shut down of facilities and staff reductions will occur. By 1990 to 1991, the entire district could be operating out of the Morrisville Junior-Senior High School. The phased shut down has already begun with the closing of the Capitol View Elementary School. Parochial School: Holy Trinity School at Stockham Avenue and Osborne Avenue, and St. John The Evangelist School at Big Oak Road and Makefield Road currently serve elementary students in the Morrisville Area. B. Parks and Recreation: A number of public outdoor recreation facilities exist within the Borough, offering opportunities fok a vari- ety of outdoor recreation uses. These facilities are enumerated on Table 6. 3 on page 44. An indoor facility which cannot be ignored is the Morrisville Senior Center, located in the basement of the Municipal Annex Building on Cleveland Avenue. A full range of activities and a meals program are offered to senior adults. The Post Road Pool Club operates a swimming pool for a private membership also within the Borough. Future Recreation Facilities: In 1981, the Borough of Morrisville received a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Re- sources under the auspices of the Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Management Program to undertake a feasibility study for the expansion of recreation. The so-called "Williamson Park Expansion Project" examined the feasi- bility of developing recreational uses on the land fill at Manor Park and on Borough-owned acreage along the Delaware River east of Delmorr Avenue. An Illustrative Site Plan for the project appears on page 45. Estimated development costs appear in Table 6.4 on page 46. Unfortunately, funds for the develop- ment of the recreation project are not readily available. However, the Borough continues to search for them. -43- TABLE 6.3 EXISTING PUBLIC OUTDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES There are a number of public outdoor recreation facili- ties in Morrisville. Each of them differs in size and amount of equipment. They are enumerated below: Recreation Existing Facility ownership Land (Acres) Present Use Facilities Capitol View Public- 5.0 Play Playground Elementary School equipment area, regular School football field and track, hockey field (used as two softball fields in sum- mer) Cox Avenue Leased by 3.5 Baseball Baseball field Playground Borough and open play from year space to year Grandview Public7 7.4 Play Playground Elementary School equipment area School Ifillcrest Public- .75 Play Playground Avenue Park Borough equipment area Manor Park Public- .3 Play Playground Elementary School equipment area School Manor Park Public- 1.2 Play Basketball, Playground Borough equipment picnic and open play space Morrisville Public- 15.0 Softball, Parking, gym, High School School baseball, 2 softball football fields, 2 baseball fields, practice football M.R. Reiter Public- .9 Baseball, Small size Elementary School play athletic field, School equipment playground @rea Williamson Public- 5.0 Play 3 ball fields, Park (Island Borough 35.8*(un- equipment, 3 tennis Park) developed) softball, courts, 2 swim- baseball, ming pools, swimming, 500-car parking *Includes Manor Park and picnics, Delmorr Avenue acreage. tennis, basketball Source: Williamson Park Expansion Project. Borough of Morrisville, July, 1981. -44- C= F1 I' I' C:@.u C1 I" . . . E@p dl@] b,'- C3 DELM tar ]d -11 LJ L3 Ln 0 OF E -J KANOR'PARK SITE ID EJ Williamson Park Expansion Project Morrisville, Pa. TABLE 6.4 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST WILLIAMSON PARK Manor Park Site: - Zone 1 - Seniors Activity Area: $ 36,780 - Zone 21- Teens/Adults Activity Area: $111,210 - Zone 3 - Childrens' Activity Area: $ 12,000 - Miscellaneous Items: $113,100 SUBTOTAL: $273,090 Delmorr Avenue Site: Zone 1 - Boat Access, Cartway, Parking Lot, Fishing Dock: $108,978 Zone 2 - Picnic Ground: $ 8,400 Miscellaneous Items: $ 6,600 SUBTOTAL: $123,978 TOTAL: $397,068 Engineering Fees/Contingencies (15%): $ 59,560 GRAND TOTAL: $456,628 Source: Williamson Park Expansion Project. Borough of Morrisville, July, 1981. L -46- C. Public Service Facilities: Borough Hall: The administrative offices of the Borough of Morris- ville are located at Washington and Union Streets. The offices and facilities located in the building in- clude: Borough Manager, Zoning Officer, Building Inspector, Civil Defense, Municipal Authority, Manager, Police, Community Room, and Council Chambers. Fire Protection: Two well-equipped and trained volunteer fire companies serve Morrisville and surrounding areas. The Union Fire Company #1 is located on Philadelphia and Washing- ton Street, and the Capitol View Fire Company on North Pennsylvania Avenue. Ambulance service is provided by the Union Fire Company from their facility at Ferry and River Roads. Shortly, ambulance service will be discontinued by the Union Fire Company and provided by a community ambulance service. A new facility for ambulance service is to be construct- ed on existing Borough-owned acreage on Union Street adjacent to the Borough Hall. Police Protection: Twenty-four (24) hour police protection is provided by a force of ten full time and six part time officers. Churches: Religious interests are presently served by the follow- ing churches and organizations: 1. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. 2. First Baptist Church of Morrisville. 3. Church of the Incarnation (Episcopal). 4. Morrisville United Methodist Church. 5. Full Gospel Church of the Calvary. 6. First Presbyterian Church of Morrisville. 7. Holy Trinity Roman Catholic Church. 8. St. John The Evangelist Roman Catholic Church. 9. Jehovah's witnesses. 10. St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Church. -47- Library: The Morrisville Public Library is presently located at East Palmer Avenue and North Pennsylvania Avenue. D. Utilities: Water: The Morrisville Waterworks is owned by the Municipal Authority and leased to the Borough. The system serves all of Morrisville and portions of Lower Makefield Township and Falls Township. The system draws all of its water from the Delaware River abandoning the former well. The relatively new filtration plant on River Road near Ferry Road is a six million gallon per day "rapid filtration" plant.' Two water storage tanks-located just north of the Borough off North Pennsylvania Avenue and off Riverview Avenue, complement the system. Sanitary Sewage: The Municipal Authority owns and operates the sewage treatment plant located on the Riverview Avenue exten- tion just off Delmorr Avenue. Plant additions were undertaken in 1965 and 1973. Presently a UNOX plant operates in conjunction with a trickling filter plant. This provides a capacity of 5.6 million gallons per day. Service extends to all of Morrisville Borough, Yardley Borough, and to portions of Lower Makefield Township and Falls Township. The Municipal Authority is presently contemplating another expansion to provide an additional 1.5 million gallons per day capacity. Under the plans, another UNOX plant would be constructed and the existing trick- ling filter plant would be eliminated. This expansion is necessary because of a need for more allocations in neighboring townships and a need for a higher magnitude of removal of wastes in the present system. -48- fkj, Q.... Existing & Prop OP p z,.p N M-- T H. '!4F, Ell 0. "4; VII. SUMMARY OF THE PLAN Policies: 1. Strengthen The Residential Community: Morrisville is, and shall remain, a single family residential community. Efforts should continue to be put forth to encourage the preservation of ex- isting housing stock through rehabilitation and, in some cases, multi-family conversions, when and if they are needed. High density new construction should be limited and carefully monitored. 2. Preserve And Strengthen Open Space And Recreation: As a Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Community, M@rr'is- ville should continue its efforts to improve ex- isting open space and recreation facilities. These efforts should include improving and guar- anteeing public access to the Delaware River and the Delaware Canal. 3. Commercial Area Revitalization: The East Bridge Street Commercial Area has con- tinued to decline in both appearance and economic viability. This area must be improved. It will not be the intent to develop a regional commercial center but rather to enchance the physical appear- ance of the area and encourage mixed-use develop- ment in existing structures. 4. Industrial Area Revitalization: The loss of the Vulcanized Rubber and Plastics Company and the Robertson-American Corporation has heavily scarred the Borough's industrial base. The Borough cannot subordinate the importance of its industrial areas for it is industry and jobs in industry which are the backbone to the viability of the other sectors. Therefore, every effort -49- should be made to in-fill these two sites and en- courage industrial development in other appropriately designated areas. Proposals: 1. Residential Areas: The preservation of existing housing stock should be encouraged. Previous proposals to encourage high density residential development in the vicinity of Center Street and Chambers Street should be aban- doned. The conversion of single family residences into multi-family residences should be allowed to continue. Recommendations for housing rehabilita- tion and street improvements as contained in the Morrisville Neighborhood Strategy Area Study as pre- pared by the Bucks County Planning Commission-in October 1981 are endorsed and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Open Space And Recreation: The continued improvement in the quantity and quality of recreation areas and open space must be encouraged. The Delaware Canal and the Delaware River frontage between the Lower Free Bridge and the Trenton Toll Bridge (U.S. 1) are recognized as opportunity areas for future recreation and open space development. The recommendations for development of recreation areas at the Manor Park site and the Delmorr Avenue site, as contained in Williamson Park Expansion Project study prepared by the Borough in July of 1981, are endorsed and incorporated herein by ref- erence. Implementation will ensure greater public access to the Delaware River Coastal Waterway. 3. Commercial Area Revitalization: The Borough should continue to play an active role in efforts to revitalize the East Bridge Street Commercial Area. Recommendations as contained in the Morrisville Neighborhood Strategy Area Study, previously referenced are endorsed. The speci-f-ic -50- proposals for public improvements and mixed-used rehabilitation as contained in the Morrisville Redevelopment Area Proposal prepared by the Bucks County Redevelopment Authority in August of 1979, are endorsed and incorporated herein by reference. Free-standing commercial uses as developed along West Bridge Street, North Pennsylvania Avenue, and West Trenton Avenue should be allowed to con- tinue for they provide valuable services to resi- dents in those areas. 4. Industrial Area Revitalization: Major efforts should be made to market the Vul- canized Rubber Works site for light industrial use as a first priority. However, should a' feasible development plan for commercial or office use be presented to the Borough it should be seriously considered for both of these uses are compatible with the surrounding areas. The Robertson-American Corporation site is an- other candidate for industrial reuse. While marketing is largely a private concern, the Borough can cooperate in efforts to find a user. The acreage bounded by Post Road and Royle Avenue has been appropriately rezoned for industrial use and presents another site for the future encourage- ment of industry. 5. Proposed Land Use Map: The Proposed Land Use Map appearing on page 52 gra- phically portrays the recommendations contained in Sections VIII, IX, X, XI and XII which follow. Two existing environmental factors in the Borough have played a dominant role in the development of the proposed Land Use Plan. These factors are the highly developed condition of the Borough and the Delaware River, which constitutes.Morrisville's northeastern boundary. 10 -51- Being a highly developed community, land uses and land use relationships are well established. Pro- posed changes in the Land Use Plan deal with inap- propriate land use relationships and designations, the consolidation of certain land uses, and the designation of the appropriate uses for the Borough's remaining vacant lands. The primary changes which are proposed are the redesignation of the area to the north of Union Avenue and the area to the south of South Delmorr Avenue from high density residen- tial to moderate density residential. These areas currently are occupied by single family and converted single family structures which would be demolished to accommodate high residential densities. This action would be undesirable. Additionally, the proposed land uses call for the elimination of two special housing areas on either side of East Bridge Street along the river, and the redesignation of the southernmost corner of the Borough from moderate density residential to industrial. The Delaware River, as were many similar waterways, was once thought most valuable as a means of trans- portation, particularly for industry and industrial wastes. The combination of the development of truck transport, the interstate highway system, and the emergence of environment awareness revealed that ur- ban waterways could and should be put to use as integral parts of the urban environment. If allowed to remain undeveloped as an urban open space, urban waterways can provide not only one of a city's greatest attractions, but a valuable flood protec- tion, recreation, and ecologically important area. Heavy industrial uses, when located along waterways, have been found to have the potential for not only local but regional negative environmental impacts. For these reasons, the proposed Land Use Plan desig- nates the majority of Morrisville's waterfront as public open space, with the exception of the southern- most portion. This area is designated industrial due to its proximity to the existing industrial uses, and the problems of providing public access to the area. It is recommended that these areas be used only for accessory uses and that no structures be constructed here. In addition, any new industry which may locate here should be light rather than heavy industry, as 10 -52- these will produce minimal environmental degradation. Those heavy industries which currently exist should be allowed to remain with continued monitoring of their effect on the river and the surrounding region. -53- Awl. 97, WIN WA 17 Aw Ira . . .......... .. .... .... ... ........ .........5. . . ........ .......... ............. VIII. PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS Morrisville prides itself on the overall quality of its residential neighborhoods. Schools recreation areas and shopping all revolve around the concept of the neighbor- hood. It is the preservation of these residential neigh- borhoods which is of paramount importance to this Plan. Two neighborhoods in particular have been the focus of past studies. They are the Chambers Street Area and the Delaware Avenue Area. Housing rehabilitation and street/ sidewalk improvements have been recommended in those areas and, in fact, are being implemented by the Bucks County Community Development Office and the Bucks County Rede- velopment Authority. Certainly, those programs and efforts should be continued. With regard to density, as stated earlier, the Center Street Area and the Chambers Area should not be encouraged for high density development. Rather, it seems appropriate to continue to allow the conversion of larger single family dwellings into Multi-family dwellings in these areas. High density development should be limited to areas immedi- ately adjacent to the Morrisville Shopping Center on East Trenton Avenue, the Pennsbury Plaza Shopping Center on Plaza Boulevard, and the area at the southern end of Harper and Stockham Avenues. In these areas, high density development can be supported by existing community facil- ities without costly improvements to the same. Special Housing: Morrisville has under produced upper income/luxury apart- ment and elderly housing. The Proposed Land Use Map designates sites where moderate and high density housing of this type is to be encouraged. -55- VIII. PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS Morrisville prides itself on the overall quality of its residential neighborhoods. Schools recreation areas and shopping all revolve around the concept of the neighbor- hood. It is the preservation of these residential neigh- borhoods which is of paramount importance to this Plan. Two neighborhoods in particular have been the focus of past studies. They are the Chambers Street Area and the Delaware Avenue Area. Housing rehabilitation and street/ sidewalk improvements have been recommended in those areas and, in fact, are being implemented by the Bucks County Community Development Office and the Bucks County Rede- velopment Authority. Certainly, those programs and efforts should be continued. with regard to density, as stated earlier, the Center Street Area and the Chambers Area should not be encouraged for high density development. Rather, it seems appropriate to continue to allow the conversion of larger single family dwellings into Multi-family dwellings in these areas. High density development should be limited to areas immedi- ately adjacent to the Morrisville Shopping Center on East Trenton Avenue, the Pennsbury Plaza Shopping Center on Plaza Boulevard, and the area at the southern end of Harper and Stockham Avenues. In these areas, high density development can be supported by existing community facil- ities without costly improvements to the same. Special Housing: Morrisville has under produced upper income/luxury apart- ment and elderly housing. The Proposed Land Use Map designates sites where moderate and high density housing of this type is to be encouraged. -55- As the trend towards a more elderly population in the Borough continues, housing aimed specifically at meeting the needs of this elderly population will become increas- ingly important. Numerous elderly citizens groups have already expressed an interest in this type of housing as the larger units they are currently inhabiting become in- creasingly inefficient at meeting their needs. The perception of the need for upper income housing results from the fact that the Borough contains a significant per- centage of lower income units and it is a commonly held opinion that the health of a community is dependent on its ability to provide for a broad range of economic groups. _56- IX. PLAN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES Recreation/Open Space: As stated previously, the Plan for the development of additional recreation and open space on Borough-owned acreage in Manor Park and off Delmorr Avenue along the Delaware River should be pursued. Recreational develop- ment in this area is suitable in light of the fact that this particular section of Morrisville lacks such a facility. Of course, such development will also ensure greater public access to the Delaware River which'is a valuable recreation asset. Two additional opportunities for further study for the purpose of recreation/open space preservation are the Delaware Canal and Delaware River frontage betweein'the Lower Free Bridge and the Trenton Freeway Bridge. The Borough should pursue the feasibility of recreation de- velopment in these areas. Schools: Declining enrollments have already triggered planning efforts on the part of the Morrisville School District. If Morrisville continues to operate an autonomous school system, reductions in staff and facilities are the pro- jected result. Perhaps it is not too soon to develop feasibility studies for the reuse of these facilities and the re-employment of support staff. Certainly no new school facilities need be constructed. Utilities: This plan recognizes and endorses the current plans for the expansion of the sewage treatment facility located off Riverview Avenue by the Morrisville Municipal Authority. This expansion is necessary and appropriate to meeting increased demands for allocations in areas outside the Borough. Also the improvements will provide the system with a higher magnitude of removal. -57- X.. PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL AREAS Morrisville already has adopted a Redevelopment Plan for the Central Area of Morrisville. Included within the boundaries of this Redevelopment Area is the East Bridge Street Commercial Area. The physical improvement of this area is a top priority. Proposals provide for the com- pletion of streetscape and sidewalk improvements on East Bridge Street between Pennsylvania Avenue and Washington Street; creation of an off-street parking area in the area of Railroad Avenue to serve businesses on East Bridge Street; and structural rehabilitation within the Rede- velopment Area. An Illustrative Site Plan on page 56 shows these physical improvements. The proposals contain- ed in Morrisville Redevelopment Area Plan prepared by the Redevelo@ment Authority of Bucks County are endor.s@.!d and incorporated herein by reference. Free-standing commercial and office uses along West Bridge Street, North Pennsylvania Avenue and Trenton Avenue should be continued. However, it will be the policy to limit the spread of commercial uses away from those corridors into residential areas. Vacancies in existing retail shopping centers or commercial buildings should be filled whenever possible before new construction is encouraged. -58- IL A IF/ rM 9, xo-x@ X@ \Xxx@ -0@ AN* 7jj *\i- 01 - "-4 IN @t Central -T< Al terna RON MORRI Bucks Cc 0 92wm XI. PLAN FOR INDUSTRIAL AREAS of immediate concern to the Borough of Morrisville is the loss of two industrial employers; the Vulcanized Rubber And Plastics Company and the Robertson-American Corporation. Two vacant industrial sites now exist with- in the Borough and a reuse for these sites needs to be found. Both sites have excellent highway access and visibility, are served by rail and all utilities are in place. While it is recognized that neither of these two sites are under Borough ownership and control, the Borough can, and should, continue present efforts to market them. In the case of the Vulcanized Rubber And Plastics Company site, and in view of its close proximity to the East Bridge Street Commercial Area, the Borough will i:emain receptive to the reuEe of the site for commercial, and/or office purposes in a@dition to industrial use. Certain'vacant land rarcels in the vicinity of Post Road and Royle Avenue are reclassified for industrial use. This reclassificatior is more in keeping with the pre- ponderance of uses ir the vicinity of the site. Such a reclassification will also resolve present inconsistencies between the Comprehersive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. -60- XII. PLAN FOR TRANSPORTATION Highways And Streets: As stated in the previous plan, the condition of the trans- portation system that serves Morrisville; that is its streets, highways, bridges and public transit, play a sig- nificant role in the future of Morrisville. The ease with which people and commodities move about to large degree de- termines the level of satisfaction with living and working within the Borough. The road classification and design standards presented in the 1966 Comprehensive Plan remain consistent with the transportation system in Morrisville and need no revision. They are incorporated herein by reference. This Plan continues to endorse the 1966 Comprehensive Plan recommendations that Trenton Avenue be rebuilt to Penn- sylvania Department of Transportation design standards. This Plan recognizes the need for continued maintenance of the existing Calhoun Street Bridge. No Capital Improvements Plan presently exists for the Bor- ough of Morrisville. A need for such a Plan, which should include a survey of all street, sidewalk, curb and drain- age conditions, should be undertaken as soon as possible by a qualified Engineer. Cost estimates should then be prepared from those surveys and a recommended list of priority projects should be drafted. Previous Plans such as the Morrisville Neighborhood Strategy Area Study prepared by the Nucks County Planning Commission in October of 1981 have recommended capital improvements. These recommendations should be reviewed by a qualified Engineer and prioritized with other possible projects. Pre- sent plans to resurface North Harding Avenue (Osborne to West Palmer) and West Maple Avenue (Lafayette to Stockham) as evidenced in the Borough of Morrisville 1982 Budget are endorsed. -61- Public Transit: This Plan endorses the continued upgrading of commuter rail facilities throughout the Northeast Corridor and recommends the expansion of SEPTA BUS service as warranted by ridership. -62- XIII. EFFECTUATION To implement the policies and recommendations contained in this Plan, the Borough must continue its practice of intragovernmental and intergovernmental cooperation. The Borough Administration, Council and Planning Commis- sion must work cooperatively on land development issues and continue to be guided by the Zoning Ordinance, Sub- division Regulations, and Building, Plumbing, Electrical and Housing Codes. To effectuate plans for the revitalization of commercial and residential areas and the preservation of open space; the Borough must continue to cooperate and enlist the support of the Bucks County Planning Commission, the Bucks County Office of Community Development and the Bucks Coun- ty Redevelopment Authority. It will be chiefly through the actions of these agencies that federal and state funds will be secured to implement these plans. Plans for industrial areas will largely be beyond the direct control of the Borough. However, the resources and assistance of the Bucks County Industrial Development Authority and the Bucks County Redevelopment Authority should not be overlooked. -63- r 'aw It 0 9 a 4 4 ! 111111 11111111MINIIIIII 1 3 6668 14102 8649