[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]








                                                            @A


                                                                                             J
                                                                                                    3
                                                                                              UN



                                                       STATE OF NEW YORK
                                                      DEPARTMENT OF STATE

                                                      ALBANY. N.Y. 1223 1 -0001
                   GAIL S. SHAFFER
                  SECRETARY OF STATE



                                                                     AgQ2
                                                           MAY


                 Mr. James  Burgess
                 Chief
                 Coastal Programs Division
                 Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
                  Management
                 National Oceanic -and Atmospheric
                  Administration
                 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW
                 Universal Building South
                 Washington, D.C. 20235

                 Dear Mr. Burgess:

                 Enclosed is the City of Rochester Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). The
                 LWRP has been adopted by the municipality and approved by the New York State Secretary of
                 State. In addition, your office has concurred on its incorporation into, the State's Coastal
                 Management Program as a routine program implementation action. Copies of this document are
                 also being transmitted to State agencies, as well as selected federal, county, and local agencies.

                 Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this document, feel free to contact either
                 myself or Charles McCaffrey of this office at (518) 474-6000.

                                                              Sincerely,



                                                              Geo rge; R. Stafford
                                                              Director
                                                              Division of Coastal Resources
                                                               and Waterfront Revitalization
                 GRS:gn
                 Enclosure








                                                          ej printed on recycled oam












                                                              City of Rochester
                       Local Waterfront Revitalization ''Pro g@@ ram











                                                  US Department of Commerce
    V)                                        NOAA Coastal Services Cz7n@ter Library
                                                    22341 South Hobsws Avanue
                                                    Charleston, SC 204.05-2413


                                                                                    Adopte&
                                       City of Rochester City Council, September 13, 1990

                                                                                  Appmved:
                                NYS Secretary of State Gail S.- Shaffer, November- 26, 1990
k 01                                                                              Concurred.-
                U.S. Office Of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, January 28.,. 1991








               This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program has been adopted
               and approved in accordance with the provisions of the Waterfront
               Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act
               (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing regulations
               (6 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation of this
               Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State
               Coastal Management Program as a Routine Program
               Implementation has been obtained in accordance with the
               provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
               (P.L. 92-583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15
               CFR 923).


               The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal
               grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic
               and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal
               Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act
               of 1972, as amen&d. Federal Grant No. NA-82-AA-D-CZ068.


               The New York State Coastal Management Program and the
               preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are
               administered by the New York State Department of State, Division
               of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization,
               162 Washington Avenue, New York 12231.




















                                       US Departmen-t Of COMMerCO
                                  NOAA Coaot!7@,@            Center LibrsWl
                                         2234 S3,c-'












                                                  






                                                STATE OF NEW YORK
                                               DEPARTMENT OF STATE
                                               ALBANY. N.Y. 12231-0001

                  GAIL S. SHAFFER
                 SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                November 26, 1990











                  Honorable Thomas P. Ryan
                  Mayor
                  City of Rochester
                  City Hall
                  30 Church Street
                  Rochester, NY 14614


                  Dear Mayor Ryan:

                  It is with great pleasure that I inform you that, pursuant to the Waterfront
                  Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act, I have approved the
                  City of Rochester Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). The City is
                  to be commended  for its thoughtful and energetic response to opportunities
                  presented along its waterfront.

                  I will notify State agencies shortly that I have approved the City LWRP and will
                  provide them with a list of their activities which must be undertaken in a manner
                  consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the Rochester LWRP.

                  Again, I would like to commend the City on its efforts to develop the LWRP and
                  look forward to working with you in the years to come as you endeavor to
                  revitalize your waterfront.


                                                        Sincerely,







                                                        Gail S. Shaffer
                        
                        

















                   GSS:gn 







                                   City of Rochester
                                   City Clerks Office
                                   Certified Ordinance

                                   Rochester, N.Y.,

                                   TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
           I hereby certify  that the following is a true copy of an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council Of
                            
           the City of Rochester on September 11, 1990 and Approved by the 
                                                          (not disapproved, approved, repealed after disapproval)
           Mayor of the City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on September 13, 1990 in accordance    
           with the applicable provisions of law.              Ordinance No. 90-362


                                  Approving The Locai Waterfront
                                  Revitalization Program And Authorizing
                                  Its Transmission  To The New York State
                                  Department of State

                      BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:
                      Section 1.  The Council hereby approves the City's  Local Waterfront 
                  Revitalization Program and the Mayor is hereby authorized to transmit said program
                  to the    York State Department of State for approval in accordance with  Article 42
                  of the Executive Law of New York State.

                      Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.





                   Passed by the following vote:
                   Ayes  - President Curran, Council members Childress Brown, Giess, King, Mains,
                           Muldoon, Norwood, Padilla, Stevenson - 9.
                   Nays - None - 0.











                                                  Attest 

                                                                                 City Clerk






                                               UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
                                               NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
                                               OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
                                               Washington, D.C. 20235









            George Stafford
            Director
            Division of Coastal Resources
             and Waterfront Revitalization
            Department of State
            162 Washington Street
            Albany, N.Y. 12231


            Dear George,

            The Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management concurs with
            your request to incorporate the City of Rochester Local Water-
            front Revitalization Program (LWRP) into the New York State
            Coastal Management Program as a Routine Program Implementation
            (RPI) change. We received comments from three Federal agencies,
            none objecting to incorporating the LWRP as a RPI. This approval
            assumes you will make no further changes to the document in
            addition to the ones submitted.

            In accordance with the Coastal Management Regulations, 15 CFR
            923.84, Federal Consistency will apply to the City of Rochester
            after you publish notice of our approval.



                                      Sincerely,

                                          

                                      Timothy R.E. Keeney
                                      Director
                                            
                                            



                                                                        






                                                  CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                      LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN



                                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS

                SECTION              SECTION TITLE                                               PAGE

                EXECUTIVE SUNNARY      . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         ES-1

                                     WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY
                                       Boundary narrative description     . . . . . . . . .      1-3
                                       Naps  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         1-5

                                     INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
                                       Table of contents   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         11-3
                                       Inventory and analysis     . . . . . . . . . . .          11-5

                                     VATERFRONT REVITALIZATION    PROGRAN POLICIES
                                       Table of contents   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       111-3
                                       Policies   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        111-5

                IV                   PROPOSED LAND AND WATER USES AND PROPOSED PROJECTS
                                       Table of contents   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       IV-3
                                       Recomended land uses for each LWRP subarea       . . .    IV-13
                                       Reco =e nded projects within the LWRP     . . . . . .     IV-32
                                       Sumary of section     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       IV-52

                V                    TECHNIQUES FOR INPLENENTATION OF THE PROGRAN,
                                       Table of contents   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       V-3
                                       Implementing techniques    . . . . . . . . . . . . .      V-9
                                       Slumary of implementing techniques      . . . . . . .     V-39
                                       Summary of section    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       V-40

                Vi                   STATE AND FEDERAL ACTIONS AND PROGRANS, LIKELY
                                       TO AFFECT IMPLEMEMATION
                                       Introduction    . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 VI-3
                                       Actions and programs to be undertaken in a
                                        manner consistent with the program     . . . . . . .     VI-4
                                       Actions and programs necessary to further
                                        the program    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       VI-26

                V11                  CONSULTATION WITH OTHER AFFECTED FEDERAL. STATE
                                       REGIONAL AND LOCAL AGENCIES    . . . . . . . . . . .      VII-3

                Vill                 LOCAL CONNITHENT    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       VIII-3

                                     APPENDIX
                                       Rochester River Harbor Redevelopment Design and
                                        Feasibility Study     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      1
                                       Legislation Resulting from the Rochester LWRP             47






















                                                  CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                      LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM



                                                   LISTING OF MAPS





                    I-1              LWRP boundary   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       I-5
                  II-1                Location Map - City of Rochester      . . . . . . . . . II-6
                II-2                Rochester's Waterfront planning    areas  . . . . . . .     II-8
                II-3                Early Rochester settlements    . . . . . . . . . . . .      II-10
                II-4                LWRP existing land uses    . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      II-15
                II-5                Public parkland within the LWRP    . . . . . . . . . .      II-25
                  II-6                LWRP scenic views and vistas     . . . . . . . . . . .     II-35
                II-7                LWRP natural resources     . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      II-39
                II-8                Major land owners within the LWRP     . . . . . . . . .     II-54
                II-9                The Port and River Street sites    . . . . . . . . . .      II-57
                II-10               Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats       .  .   II-67
                  IV-1                LWRP subareas   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       IV-7
                IV-2                Ontario Beach Park, Port Authority Site and      . . . .    IV-39
                                    River Street Redevelopment Area Concept Plan       . . .
                  V-1               Zoning in the LWRP    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




















                                                           2





























                                                 CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                     LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN




                                                 LISTING OF TABLES





                II-1                LWRP existing land uses   . . . . . . . . . . . ... .      II-14
                II-2                Culturally significant sites within the LWRP       . . .   II-34
                II-3                State designated wetlands within the LWRP     . . . . .    II-44
                II-4                NYS Registry inactive hazardous waste sites
                                      within the LWRP                                            II-51
                II-5                Relevant laws and regulations                               II-52
                IV-1                Summary of LWRP policy evaluations by subarea               IV-20
                  V-1               Summary of legislation and additional actions
                                      which implement LWRP policies                            V-39



















                                                           3










                                              CITY OF ROCHESTER
                               LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION  PROGRAN (LWRP)


                                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



               INTRODUCTION
               The New York State Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) is designed to
               give coastal communities an opportunity to analyze their shoreline areas,
               establish policies to guide development, and implement appropriate waterfront
               land uses and projects. A LWRP is a planning framework foe future public and
               private development activities or actions within the waterfront revitalization
               area. Approval of a LWRP also makes municipalities eligible for state financial
               assistance to implement proposed projects.


               The City of Rochester considers its Lake Ontario and Genesee River shorelines to
               be among its most important recreational , aesthetic and economic resources. The
               ci tyl s LWRP wi I I restore and revi tal i ze deteri orated and underuti I i zed waterf ront
               areas by promoting water and recreation-oriented uses and activities appropriate
               for the waterfront revitalization area. Rochester's LWRP will become the New
               York State Coastal Management Plan for this area, requiring state and federal
               acti ons wi thi n the boundary to be cons i stent wi th I ocal 1 y determi ned pol i ci es and
               development guidelines.


               OVERVIEW
               The City of  Rochester's LWRP is divided into eight sections and an appendix:
                            SECTION I provides a narrative description and map of the LWRP
                            boundary;
                            SECTION II provides an inventory and analysis of the natural and
                            man-made resources within the LWRP;
                            SECTION III describes the policies governing the LWRP;
                            SECTION IV details proposed land uses and projects within the LWRP;
                            SECTION V summarizes the techniques to be used for implementing the
                            LWRP;
                            SECTION VI describes the state and federal programs likely to affect
                            implementation of the LWRP;

                                                      ES-1









                           SECTION VII provides a summary of the city's consultations with
                           other affected municipalities and government agencies; and
                           SECTION VIII describes the methodology for obtaining local
                           commitment and citizen input.
                           The APPENDIX consists of city zoning and ordinance regulations.


              SUNNARY OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER'S LWRP



                      SECTION 1: BOtMARY KAP AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION


                      The city's LWRP boundary is based on the coastal boundary determined for
                      Rochester by the New York State Department of State. The "spineu of the
                      boundary follows the Genesee River within the city, from the Middle Falls
                      near Ravine Avenue, north to the river's mouth at Lake Ontario.         The
                      boundary includes part of the northern-most section of the city and
                      contains portions of the Maplewood and Charlotte neighborhoods, as well
                      as Seneca Park, Maplewood Park and Turn ing Point Park. The LWRP boundary
                      also covers the city's Lake Ontario shoreline including Ontario Beach and
                      Durand-Eastman Parks. A smal I portion of Tryon Park which borders Ironde_
                      quoit Creek just south of Irondequoit Bay is also included in the city's
                      LWRP boundary. The boundary is shown on a map on page ES-3.


                      SECTION 11: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS


                      Water has been   extremely important to     the economic development of
                      Rochester.   The Genesee River falls and rapids have provided cheap,
                      accessible power throughout the history of  the city. The river and lake
                      have been key in establishing shipping as   an important industry in the
                      area. The early  settlements whichwere the  forerunners of the city began
                      because of proximity to the river and Lake  Ontario.


                      In recent years, the river and lake have been rediscovered by city
                      residents and visitors. Because of stricter environmental controls, the
                      efforts of private industry and the completion of several major public
                      works projects, water quality of the river and lake has improved

                                                      ES-2















                                                                      CITY OF ROCHESTER




                                                                              UP swomy









                                                                i i v






                                                              CC77













                          CITY OF ROCHESTER LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM (LWRP) BOUNDARY




                                                           ES-3









                       significantly. As a result, the Genesee River and Lake Ontario can once
                       again be enjoyed and appreciated as unique areas for hiking, sightseeing,
                       fishing, swimming and boating.         The increased use of waterfront
                       recreational facilities is creating additional demand for water-dependent
                       and water-enhanced uses such as boat slips and pedestrian trails within
                       the LWRP boundary.


                       The city's LWRP contains a wealth of natural and man-made resources.
                       Marinas, boat slips and docks, public parks, beaches, historic sites,
                       scenic views and vistas, and wetland areas are just a few of the many
                       water-oriented resources or land uses that currently exist within the LWRP
                       boundary.   Additionally, the New York State Department of State has
                       designated approximately six and one-half miles of the lower Genesee River
                       as a coastal fish and wildlife habitat of statewide significance.


                       There are several obstacles to development that exist within the LWRP
                       boundary.  The most critical obstacle is wave surge action in the river
                       caused by northeastern storms. Other obstacles include the steep slopes
                       of the river gorge and the relative inaccessibility of the river in many
                       locations. These constraints limit development in a substantial portion
                       of the LWRP boundary.      There are, however, several sites that have
                       significant development potential within the LWRP boundary.         The most
                       important of these are the River Street area (including the former Conrail
                       switching yards on the river, near the historic Genesee Lighthouse) and
                       the former Port of Rochester site.          Neither of these parcels has
                       significant infrastructure problems, although each has its own unique set
                       of development problems and constraints.


                       SECTION III: POLICIES


                       The most pertinent state policies that impact the city's LWRP are listed
                       below.
                       (1)   Restore, revitalize and redevelop deteriorated and underutilized
                             waterfront areas for commercial. industrial, cultural, recreational
                             and other compatible uses.

                                                        ES-4









                     (2)  Significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats shall be protected,
                          preserved, and, where practical,  restored so as to maintain their
                          viability as habitats.
                     (3)  Expand recreational use of fish and wildlife resources in coastal
                          areas by increasing access to existing resources, supplementing
                          existing stocks and developing new resources. Such efforts shall be
                          made in a manner which ensures the protection of renewable fish and
                          wildlife resources and considers other activities dependent on them.
                     (4)  Activities or development in the coastal areas will be undertaken so
                          as to minimize damage to natural resources and property from
                          flooding and erosion by protecting natural protective features
                          including beaches, dunes, barrier islands and bluffs.
                     (5)  Protect. maintain and @increase the levels and types of access to
                          public water-related recreation resources and facilities so that
                          these resources and facilities may be fully utilized by the public
                          in accordance with reasonably anticipated public recreation needs
                          and the protection of historic and natural resources.
                     (6)  Protect, enhance and restore structures, districts, areas or sites
                          that are of significance in the history, architecture, archaeology
                          or culture of the state, its communities or the nation.


                     SECTION IV: LWRP USES AND PROJECTS


                     The policies of the city's LWRP outlined in SECTION III were translated,
                     with input from a citizen's advisory committee, into a conceptual
                     development plan for the city's waterfront areas. This was accomplished
                     by identifying appropriate land uses and projects for the following
                     subareas within the LWR1P boundary:
                                 Subarea A  -  Durand-Eastman Park
                                 Subarea B  -  Open Space / Critical Environmental Areas
                                 Subarea C1 -  Developed portion of the Upland Area
                                 Subarea C2 -  Buildable portion of the Upland Area
                                 Subarea 0  -  River Harbor Zone and Lakefront Area
                                 Subarea E  -  Industrial Areas



                                                     ES-5









                       The following generalized land uses are recommended for each LWRP subarea:
                       SUBAREA                                RECOMMENDED LAND USES
                       (A)   DURAND-EASTMAN PARK              Public   walkways,   fishing     areas,
                                                              swimming areas, picnicking areas,
                                                              parking,    cartop    boat      access,
                                                              spectator site for off-shore events,
                                                              treatment facilities, field sports,
                                                              and outdoor entertainment.


                       (B)   OPEN SPACE / CRITICAL            Public walkways, fishing areas,
                             ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS              picnicking areas, parking areas,
                                                              cartop boat access, swimming, outdoor
                                                              entertainment, museum, and zoo.


                       (CI) DEVELOPED PORTION                 Public walkways, marine-related
                             OF THE UPLAND AREA               support facilities, hotel, general
                                                              re tail    facilities        including
                                                              restaurants,      office      research
                                                              facilities, parking, and housing.


                       (C2) RUILDARLF PORTION                 Public walkway, housing, parking,
                             OF TUF 11PLAND ARFA              office research facilities, and
                                                              manufacturing facilities.


                       (D)   RIVER HARBOR-ZONE                Public walkways, swimming areas,
                             AND LAKEFRONT AREA               fishing areas,     picnicking areas,
                                                              outdoor    entertainment,      festival
                                                              sites,    field    sports,     marinas,
                                                              marina-related support facilities,
                                                              parking areas, cartop boat access,
                                                              retail     facilities        including
                                                              restaurants, hotel/boatel or     bed &
                                                              breakfast inn, and housing.




                                                        ES-6








                     (E)   INDUSTRIAL AREAS               Public walkways, fishing areas,
                                                          parking, manufacturing facilities,
                                                          power generating facilities, office
                                                          research facilities, water treatment
                                                          facilities, shipping, water-related
                                                          retail support facilities, hotel or
                                                          bed & breakfast inn, and housing.


                     SECTION V: INPLEKEWATION TECHNIQUES


                     Changes to the City of Rochester Zoning Ordinance were adopted in order
                     to implement many of the state coastal policies applicable to the LWRP.
                     Some of the major changes are listed below.
                     (1)   Modification of the city's River Harbor (RH) Zoning District to
                           permit such uses as housing, hotels, motels and boatels, multiple
                           uses, and to allow certain uses subject to special permit.
                     (2)   Modification of the RH Zoning District to include: a purpose
                           statement with references to the preservation and enhancement of the
                           recreational character and visual quality of the river harbor area,
                           the preservation and promotion of public access to the shoreline and
                           the encouragement of tourism in the area; and a new use list which
                           will permit such facilities as marinas, boat launches and docks, and
                           public walkways.
                     (3)   Adoption of the Harbor Town Design Overlay District which will
                           require a certificate of design compliance for certain types of new
                           development in the shorezone, to be granted after a review process
                           based on design guidelines for landscaping, signage, visual
                           compatibility, site development, etc.


                     SECTION VI: STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRANS LIKELY TO AFFECT INPLEMENTATION


                           A wide variety of federal and state programs and actions are likely
                           to impact or be affected by the city's LWRP. The general program
                           categories involved are listed below.



                                                     ES-7









                                 *  Economic Development Policies and Programs
                                 *  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Programs
                                 *  Flood Control Projects
                                 *  Navigation Projects
                                 *  Community Development Block Grants / Entitlement Grants
                                 *  Fish and Wildlife Restoration and Research Projects
                                 *  Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
                                     Programs
                                    Department of Transportation Programs
                                    Air Pollution /Water Pollution Control Programs and Grants
                                    Environmental Protection Programs and Grants
                                    Environmental Conservation Programs and Policies
                                    Division of Housing and Community Renewal Programs and
                                     Policies



                      SECTION VII: CITY'S CONSULTATIONS VITH AFFECTED AGENCIES


                      As part of the preparation of the LWRP, the city consulted with numerous
                      county, state and federal agencies, as well as with neighboring
                      municipalities. Included in these consultations were the New York State
                      Departments of State, Environmental Conservation, and Transportation, the
                      Monroe County Planning Department and Parks Department, as well as the
                      Towns of Irondequoit and Greece.


                      SECTION VIII: LOCAL CONNITNENT


                      The City of Rochester established a citizen's advisory committee to assist
                      in the overall planning process and the development of specific LWRP
                      recommendations, as well as to ensure public support and commitment for
                      implementation of the LWRP. Organizations that were represented on the
                      advisory committee included neighborhood and business groups within or
                      adjacent to the study area, the County Planning and Parks Departments, the
                      City Planning Commission and Environmental Commission, and groups with
                      maritime interests such as New York State Sea Grant, the Monroe County



                                                      ES-8









                    Fishery Advisory Board, a yacht club, a marina owner, and a real estate
                    brokerage firm.


                    Support for the LWRP was also sought through meetings with the agencies
                    and organizations which could be affected by implementation of the LWRP.
                    Policy and project coordination also occurred between the city and
                    adjacent towns who were preparing LWRPIs. Further public participation
                    in LWRP development occurred through the implementation requirements of
                    the plan as well as through the LWRP adoption process.


              ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
              Questions, comments or requests for additional information concerning the City
              of Rochester's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program should be directed to:
                                               Larry 0. Stid
                                           Director of Planning
                         Department of Community Development, Office of Planning
                                           Room 125-B, City Hall
                                             30 Church Street
                                        Rochester, New York 14614
                                           Phone (716) 428-6924
























                                                    ES-9






   0

















































                                        SECTION 1: WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY
  0









               The City of Rochester's Local-Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) boundary
               described in this section is based on the coastal boundary determined for the
               city by the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) under the Coastal Zone
               Manage-ment Program. The city's LWRP boundary is delineated on lu=400 ft. land
               use maps and 10=24,000 ft. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSOOT)
               planimetric maps. The boundary is shown on MAP I-1 on pages 1-5 through 1-9.

               The city's northern LWRP boundary follows the Lake Ontario shoreline.         This
               boundary runs from the Rochester /Greece municipal line on the west near Greenleaf
               Road, to the Rochester/Irondequoit municipal boundary located just east of the
               U.S. Coast Guard Station, on the east bank of the Genesee River. This section
               of the LWRP boundary includes the mouth of the Genesee River at Lake Ontario.

               The "spine" of the City's LWRP boundary follows the Genesee River within the
               city, from the Middle Falls area near Ravine Avenue, north to the river's mouth
               at Lake Ontario.   The boundary includes a large portion of the northern-most
               section of the city, which contains the Maplewood and Charlotte neighborhoods,
               as well as Ontario Beach Park, Seneca Park and Maplewood Park. The boundary also
               includes Durand-Eastman Park, which while technically contiguous to the city, is
               remotely located from the city proper. This park is located on Lake Ontario and
               is surrounded on three sides by the Town of Irandequoit. Portions of the LWRP
               study area are adjacent to the Town of Greece on the west, and the Town of
               Irondequait on the east.

               The western boundary of the LWRP begins at the western edge of the city's Lake
               Ontario shoreline, and proceeds south following the Rochester/Greece municipal
               line to the Lake Ontario State Parkway (LOSP). The boundary then heads east
               along the southern edge of Lake Avenue to Driving Park Avenue. Properties on the
               east side of this section of Lake Avenue are included within the LWRP boundary.
               Properties on the west side of this section of Lake Avenue are outside the
               boundary. At the Lake Avenue/Driving Park Avenue intersection, the boundary
               turns east, following the southern edge of Driving Park to the Genesee River
               Gorge. The boundary then heads south along the top of the gorge wall on the west
               side of the river, to the Middle Falls Dam.

               At the Middle Falls Dam, the boundary heads southeast across the dam, then north,
               following the top of the gorge wall on the east side of the Genesee River Gorge.
               The boundary then heads south along the top of the gorge wall on the west side
               of the river, to the Middle Falls Dam.

               At the Middle Falls Dam, the boundary heads southeast across the dam, then north,
               following the top of the gorge wall on the east side of the Genesee River, to
               Driving Park Avenue. At Driving Park Avenue, the boundary turns east and follows
               the eastern edge of St. Paul Street to Long Acre Road. Properties on the east
               side of this section of St. Paul Street are located outside the boundary while
               properties on the west side are located within the boundary.

               At the intersection of Long Acre Road and St. Paul Street, the boundary picks up
               the Rochester/ I rondeuoi t municipal line and follows that line north, roughly
               parallel to the Conrail railroad tracks which are located on the eastern bank
               of the Genesee River. In one particular location along the east bank of the


                                                      1-3








               river, north of the Turning Basin, the boundary, by following the city/town line,
               actually extends out into the river, thereby excluding the river shore and
               adjacent sensitive environ-mental features from both the city's and Irondequoit's
               LWRP study areas. The eastern boundary of the city's LWRP continues north along
               the Rochester/ Irondequoit municipal line to the Lake Ontario shoreline. The
               boundary terminates just east of the mouth of the Genesee River at Lake Ontario,
               near the U.S. Coast Guard Station.

               The city's LWRP boundary also includes Ourand-Eastman Park, which is located on
               Lake Ontario.   The park is not immediately contiguous to the city, with the
               exception of a long, narrow strip of land which is used as the Culver Road
               right-of-way and provides access to the park through the Town of Irondequoit.
               The park is bounded on the north by Lake Ontario, and on the east, south and west
               by the Town of Irondequoit.

               The LWRP boundary for Durand-Eastman Park includes the shoreline of Lake Ontario
               on the north. The western boundary begins at the western edge of the park's Lake
               Ontario shoreline and proceeds southwest, following the City of Rochester/Town
               of Irondequoit municipal line.     The boundary in this location runs roughly
               parallel to Oakridge Drive in the town, to an area near the intersection of
               Oakridge Drive and Scotch Lane.    The boundary then heads east, following the
               city/town line, then turns south near where Kings Highway enters the park. At
               this point, the boundary turns east again, near Rainbow Drive in the town,
               jogging slightly south to Durand Drive. The boundary then heads north, to an
               area just north of Park Road in Irondequoit, then heads east, parallel to Park
               Road, and continues to Culver Road. The boundary follows Culver Road north to
               Havenwood Drive, then heads east to an area just west of Birchhills Drive. The
               boundary then turns north, and continues to the Lake Ontario shoreline where it
               terminates to the west of Scenic View Drive.

               Rochester's LWRP boundary also includes a portion of Tryon Park, which is located
               on the east side of the city, near Irondequoit Creek which is adjacent to Ellison
               Park. Tryon Park is situated to the east of the Route 590 Expressway, north of
               Browncroft Boulevard. The LWRP boundary for Tryon Park includes the City of
               Rochester/Town of Irondequoit municipal line on the east, north and west. The
               boundary on the south is a continuation of the city/town line which runs west to
               east, just north of Colebourne Road.

               A potential problem exists regarding the exclusion of certain sensitive
               environmental features from both the Rochester and Irondequoit LWRP study areas
               adjacent to the river, north of the Turning Basin. These features include steep
               wooded slopes, wetlands, floodplain and drainage areas, and the shoreline itself.
               Development of these sensitive environmental features could adversely impact
               Genesee River water quality, scenic views and vistas, and the availability of
               public access to and through the shorezone. The city's control over this area
               is limited by its own municipal boundary. The city is therefore concerned that
               the existing LWRP boundary along this portion of the river may not be sufficient
               to protect these sensitive environmental areas. The city believes that the LWRP
               boundary should be based on existing topographic and/or soils characteristics as
               well as other natural features in this area, rather than on martificialO
               municipal boundary lines.


                                                      1-4









                                                                                                                                                               LOCAL WATERFRONT
                                                                                                                                                               REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                                                                                                                               Rochester, New York


                                                                                                                                                               Legend


                                                                                                                                                                        emomino LWRP Boundary



                                                                                                       n%l a 4.0






                                                                                                                      Z












                                                                              41,
                                                                                04               ,61


                                                                                                                                                v 9'


                                                     A
                                                                                                                                     cis


                                                       61rr /7 -2r.-


                                              lb





                                                                                                             \X

                                    j;








                                                   /D#


                                                  Jim









                                  -OLC"
                                                                                                                                                                                           -C--mmunity Deve
                                                                                                                                                               Department of o
                                                                                                       Match Line          A                                   Bureau of Planning and Zoning
                                                                                                                                                            1,0000 0                              2, 00(f
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                N
                                                                                                                                                               scale


                                                                                                                                                                                   for the Now York State DEP&MMOnt Of State COMC&I
                                                                                                                                                               n- nap - prepared
                                                                                                                                                               Ponagueent FrOVANIN @Lth fLINICL&I &SSLStAnce fr= It'le office of ')Man and
                                                                                                                                                               C*a&t&L ReMWO8 I INk"S  t. 4&tjOn41 OCeAn&C and AWOvph8tLC AdwLStZAtiOn.
                                                    CEW I(PY                                                            -_n.
                                                                                                                                                               provuled -..Mr the Coastal @. ftna"wron, 1,ct *1 1111,  ""lad, r.&c*j
                                                                          bi                                                                                   Grant Raftnei MA-42-AA-0-V-068.






                                                      CITY OF ROCHESTER LOCAL NATERFROINU REKITALIZATION PROGRAM BOUNDARY




                                                                                                                                1-5
















                                                                                                                                                                                Z


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         L
                                                                                                                                                                                         JF
                                                                          AA
                                                                                                                                                                                                   At

                                                                                                                                                                       AIL -V
                                                                                                                                                                                                 fill
                                                    IF
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        --atch Line A



                                                                               -:7-

                                                                                                                                         A


                                                                                                                                                            A




                                                                                                                                                                              A     .0
                                                                                                                                                            RIVERSIDE            CEME111"y                                                      k
                                                                                                                                                                                                                b




                                                                                                                   IUL( 194 CIEWEI R
                                                                                                                                                          Z





                                                                                                                                                      ST BIER"m
                                                                                                                                                               oil                                                                                                      A L        L_

                                                                                    gvuvo.l      Ad
                                                                                                                                                                                        A$








                                                                                                     R


                                                                                      A"*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          7  it











                                                                                   A "61
                                                                                                          -LIL       Al
                                                                I                  . __                                                                                                                            . I


                                                   a                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -AAAAASAAAAAAA
                                                                                                                                  LN
                                                                                                              .4  11 SHALL
                                                                                                              MSG. SCHOO
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               IL


                                   3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             AL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        rod I@
                                                                                               I L                                                                                                                             At

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 at'.
                                                         Al             .!A                  AH
                                            I L
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    a T
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               OA I.An

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          SCHOUL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          rRANIVILIN


                                                                       a 1) U I N A S
                                                                       msriTurE
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             IL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        IfE 0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          "AA
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        I    L_ 1
                                                                                                                                       IV                                                                                                                                                          1!r:@mA       tAwh
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ---       -                                  .1                1"              A. I

                                              oil-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  s PLO."
                                                                                                                   A-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   IV
                                                                                                                                                                            It          A   o"     .     r                                       ::j, I                 I I.-I I - I--U
                                                                    LOW py"T
                                               If
                                                                                                                               sc
                                                                                                                                                                                   us,*
                                                                                                                                                                                            -      -1                                                                                               ra-Awrl
                                                                                                                                                                                              to



                                                                                                                                                                                                                      kL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           L4 I, ve
                                                                                                  FLI[                                                                                                                                                                  Xit
                                                       a


                                                            it     1L --- it-                 it
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            oft            _;r
                                                                                                                                                                                 ASLSL
                                                                                                              71                                                                                                                            -z-
                                                            --q@:zi
                                              IF

                                                                                                                                                                       OIL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   It                                                   to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1i                                                                                                     L
                                                                                                                                                                                        A

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          it
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        @at
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ILL '01
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                lit
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                -- *    I       -it.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  L                        I --
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           lkkj!@@                                                         (__
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                -7:'

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        sell
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        A
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        IIt
                                                                                                                                                                                                   @e
                                                                                                              ........               f4l
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        A,
                                                                                                                 PARK                   ZZ"k

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              kv..
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                jr




                                                                            CITY OF-ROCHESTER LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM BOUNDARY

                                                                                                                                                                                            1-7






   0











  0



















                                                          SECTION II: IKVElffORY AND ANALYSIS









                                               CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                   LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

                                     SECTION 11: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS

                                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

              SUBSECTION NUMBER AND TITLE                                                   PAGE

              1.    COMMUNITY PROFILE     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       11-5
                           A.    Location   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       11-5
                           B.    Population    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-5
                           C.    Employment    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-5

              2.    LWRP BOUNDARY AND SUBAREAS     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-7
                           A.    Overview   . . . . .                                         11-7
                           B.    LWRP boundary and suia@eis*                                  11-7
                           C.    Rochester's waterfront planning    areas  . . . . . . . .    11-7

              3.    HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-9
                           A.    Overview   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       11-9
                           B.    Early Rochester's waterfront     . . . . . . . . . . . .    11-11
                           C.    Waterfront rediscovery     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    11-12

              4.    GEOLOGIC  HISTORY     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-12

              5.    EXISTING  LAND USES   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-13
                           A.    Overview   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-13
                           B.    General description   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     11-13

              6.    WATER-DEPENDENT AND WATER-ENHANCED USES     . . . . . . . . . . . . .    11-19
                           A.    Overview and definitions     . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    11-19
                           B.    Water-dependent and water-enhanced uses     . . . . . . .   11-19
                           C.    Market demand for new uses     . . . . . . . . . . . . .    11-20

              7.    RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND PUBLIC ACCESS       . . . . . . . . . .   11-23
                           A.    Recreational opportunities (public parkland)       . . . .  11-23
                           B.    Public access   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     11-31

              8.    HISTORIC RESOURCES    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-32

              9.    VISUAL QUALITY        . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-33
                           A.    Overview   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-33
                           B.    Description   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     11-33

              10.   NATURAL RESOURCES     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-38
                           A.    Overview   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11-38
                           B.    Fishery resources and habitats      . . . . . . . . . . .   11-38
                           C.    Wildlife resources and habitats     . . . . . . . . . . .   11-42
                           D.    Tidal and freshwater wetlands    . . . . . . . . . . . .    11-43
                           E.    Water quality   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     11-44
                           F.    Air quality   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     11-45

                                                      11-3











                                     SECTION II: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS

                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D.)



              11.   FLOOD HAZARD AREAS    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-45
                           A.    Waterflow  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-45
                           B.    Flooding   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-45

              12.   EROSION HAZARD AREAS, SILTATION AND DREDGING      . . . . . . . . . .   II-46
                           A.    Coastal erosion hazard areas    . . . . . . . . . . . .    II-46
                           B.    Other erosion problems    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    II-47
                           C.    Siltation and dredging    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    II-47

              13.   WATER AND SEWER SERVICE   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-48


              14.   TRANSPORTATION NETWORK    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-48


              15.   OTHER ISSUES                                                            II-50
                           A.    Hazardous waste sites and storage of 
                                 toxic materials  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-50
                           B.    Summary of local laws and regulations    . . . . . . . .   II-52

              16.   DEVELOPMENT  OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS    . . . . . . . . . . . .   II-52
                           A.    Overview   . . . . .                                       II-52
                           B.    General description of  development parcels                II-53
                                                                
                           C.    The port site  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-53
                           D.    The River Street area   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    II-59


                    APPENDIX              . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     II-61



























                                                      II-4









              1.     CONNUNITY PROFILE

              A.     Location

                     Rochester is the third largest city in New York State and is located on
                     the southern shore of Lake Ontario, between Buffalo and Syracuse (see MAP
                     II-1 on page 11-6). The Genesee River flows northward through the center
                     of the city to the lake. The New York State Barge Canal runs along the
                     southern edge of the city, in a generally east-west direction. To the
                     east of the city is Irondequoit Bay which was the pre-glacial outlet of
                     the Genesee River to Lake Ontario. The city is connected to the New York
                     State Thruway via Interstate Routes 390 and 490.

              B.     Population

                     Rochester is at the center of a larger metropolitan region which includes
                     Monroe County and the counties of Wayne, Ontario, Livingston, Orleans and
                     Genesee. According to the 1980 Census, Monroe County had a population of
                     702,238 people and contained 252,217 households, while the city had a
                     population of 241,741 people and contained 94,597 households.          As with
                     many cities located in the northeastern United States, Rochester's
                     population declined between 1960 and 1980.         However, in recent years
                     Rochester's population has begun to stabilize. The city's 1985 population
                     was estimated by the Center for Governmental Research to be approximately
                     242,000 persons and is projected to reach 245,000 by 1990.

                     According to the 1980 Census, approximately 14% of Rochester's population
                     was 65 years old or older. Almost 17% of the population lived below the
                     poverty 1 evel . The med i an i ncome for the ci ty was $13, 641, as compared to
                     a median income of $18,940 within the Rochester Metropolitan Statistical
                     Area (MSA).

                     Based on 1980 figures, the city's housing stock consists primarily of one
                     and two-family units.    Forty-six percent of the city's occupied housing
                     units are owner-occupied while 54% are renter -occupied.           The average
                     selling price of a single-family home in the city increased from $20,330
                     in 1976 to $42,247 in 1983. Since 1977, approximately 15% of the city's
                     housing stock has been upgraded through the use of one of several city-
                     sponsored housing rehabilitation programs.

              C.     Empl oyment

                     Rochester has traditionally been an area of relatively stable employment.
                     The major employers in the city are Eastman Kodak Company, Xerox
                     Corporation, the University of Rochester and General Motors Corporation
                     (Rochester Products and Delco Divisions).        Total employment in Monroe
                     County in 1986 was approximately 342,000.              The Rochester area's
                     unemployment rate at the end of 1986 was 4.8% as compared to the national
                     rate of 6.3% (seasonally unadjusted).




                                                       11-5





























                                           Scale in miles                                                    mo
                                                                                                                                  QUE
                                        0,       !@o                                     ONT                                              VT                   ME

                                      ..... ............





                                              .. .... .        ....
                                                  ..........
                                               . ...........     ......
                                                                                                                                                  NH
                                               I 'llH
                                                                                        Mill
                                               .............                                    . .. ...
                                                                  TO                          ......
                                                                                                           v           NY                 MA
                                                                                        ROCHESTE
                                                   mm:
                                                                                                                                                  CT
                                                                                      Buttalo
                                ml
                                         Detroi
                                                                                                                                                          .............  ....
                                                         mi     Efic
                                                                ...........
                                                         ...... ..                                                                  Tom
                                                                                                                                              .............. ............
                                                                                                   PA                              chy                          . ........

                                                                                                                                                              .. ..........
                                                                                                                                             ..........
                                                            Clevti                                                                                                .........
                                                                                                                                             ........ ...... ....... .............
                                                    0                                                                                                   .......  .............
                                                                                                                    fladelphis        NJ
                                                                                 Pit"bur"                     Baltalml
                                                                                                         mo
                                                                                                                                                               ............
                                                                                                                                                     ...............
                                                                            wv                                                          ............ .....














                                                                                          MAP II-I
                                                                        LOCATION MAP-- CM OF ROCHESTER



                                                                                              11-6









             2.    LVRP BOUNDARY AND SUBAREAS

             A.    Overview

                   Rochester's LWRP boundary includes a coastal zone with two distinct
                   components.   These are the Genesee River gorge, and the Lake Ontario
                   shoreline. The Genesee River runs in a northerly direction through the
                   center of the city to Lake Ontario, and provides a unique urban waterfront
                   environment.    A large portion of the riverfront north of downtown
                   Rochester is characterized by a 200 foot deep gorge.       There are over
                   71,000 feet of river shoreline within the entire city.

                   The approximately 14,000 feet of Lake Ontario shoreline within the City of
                   Rochester are located at the extreme northern end of the city, in the
                   neighborhood of Charlotte, and within Durand-Eastman Park. A large part
                   of the 6,100 feet of lakefront shoreline located at the northern end of
                   the city is utilized as a public beach and is contained within Ontario
                   Beach Park.   Durand-Eastman Park, located several miles to the east and
                   surrounded by the Town of Irondequoit, contains approximately 7,600 feet
                   of lake frontage and includes wooded slopes, several ponds, a golf course
                   and a variety of passive recreational facilities.

             B.    LWRP boundary and subareas

                   The City of Rochester's LWRP boundary is shown on MAP 1-1 on pages 1-5
                   through 1-9. The boundary has been divided up into 6 subareas that are
                   delineated and described in SECTION IV: USES AND PROJECTS. The subarea
                   boundaries are shown on MAP IV-1 on page IV-7.

             C.    Rochester's waterfront planning areas

                   The city's waterfront can be divided into three distinct sections with
                   respect to city planning activities. These sections are shown on MAP 11-2
                   on page 11-8.   The northern-most portion of the river, from the Middle
                   Falls area north to Lake Ontario, and the lake frontage within the city
                   limits, are included within the boundaries of the LWRP.

                   The area from the Veteran's Memorial Bridge south through downtown to the
                   Troup-Howell Bridge is included within the city's Urban Cultural Park
                   (UCP) Management Plan. The portion of the river between the Middle Falls
                   and the Veteran's Memorial Bridge is, therefore, included in both the LWRP
                   and the UCP. Development within Rochester's UCP will focus on the signi-
                   ficance of the Genesee River in the city's history and growth, both past
                   and present. The river's primary role was as a source of power to the
                   city's early milling industries.       The river was also important in
                   providing transportation to and through the city, in facilitating
                   Rochester's evolution from a mill town to a high technology manufacturing
                   center, and the growth of Rochester's immigrant labor force which contri-
                   buted to the city's industrial development. All oil these ideas will be
                   developed in some form within the UCP.



                                                   11-7

















                                                                                                                                                                                          CITY OF ROCHESTER


                                                                                 ........................... . . . . . .
                                                                                          ..........
                                                                            ... ..... . . . . . ............. ...
                                                                                                                                                                                          SCALA
                                                                            xxx                    .. ....
                                                                                                                                            xx
                                                                                                                         X X.


                                                                                                                                       Xo:

                                                                                                 . . . . . . . . . . . .      ......



                                                                             ------            E,@W BOUNDARY






                                                                                                                     ... ....             .......
                                                                                                                                                                       E.@M BOUNDARY







                                                                                                                                                         . . .......                                         ...



                                                                                                                                                              I                                                          . .....

                                                                                                                                                       URBAN CULTURAL                  PARK       BOUNDARY









                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               .7



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 KX





                                                                                .. ...........

                                                                                                                                                                                    . ........ .............
                                                                                                                                                        GENESEE RjSbï¿½,WTH C                                                                .-.X.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -X.M.    N.:




                                                                     ................





                                                                                                                                                   MAP 11-2
                                                                                                  CITY OF ROCHESTER'S WATERFRONT PLANNING AREAS



                                                                                                                                                        JI-8








                   The adaptive reuse of the Brown's Race area within the park is key to the
                   success of the city's UCP. Several other areas within the UCP have also
                   been identified for development or preservation including Olde
                   Rochesterville, the Upper Falls industrial area, the Lake Avenue plateau,
                   the Brewer Street f 1 ats area, and the area around the Mapl ewood YMCA, near
                   the Driving Park Bridge.

                   The area of the river from Ford Street south to the New York State Barge
                   Canal (Erie Canal) is included in the Genesee River South Corridor Land,
                   Use and Development Plan. This plan, which focuses on the southern-most
                   portion of the river within the city, was jointly funded and undertaken by
                   the University of Rochester.       the County of Monroe and the City of
                   Rochester in the fall of 1984. The plan ties the redevelopment of the
                   east side of the Genesee River, which is primarily occupied by the
                   University of Rochester campus, with the phased development of the west
                   bank.

                   The university plans to redevelop the east bank as an open space and
                   recreational area, to permit university-related recreational activities,
                   public hiking, etc.     This redevelopment will include the closing of a
                   portion of Wilson Boulevard, which now separates the main portion of the
                   university campus from the river.      The plan also includes residen-tial
                   development on the east bank. The west bank, much of which is vacant land
                   recently acquired by the city from Conrail, is proposed for housing
                   development and open space/recreational uses. The adjacent neighborhood
                   is a mix of marginal industrial or warehousing uses and low to
                   moderate-income housing.

                   This area is currently the focus of plan implementation projects being
                   undertaken by the city, Monroe County and the University of Rochester.
                   These projects include the construction of a pedestrian bridge across the
                   Genesee River, and east and west river bank pedestri an/bi king trails-that
                   will connect with downtown.

             3.    HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

             A.    Overview

                   Water has always been important to the economic development of Rochester.
                   The Genesee River falls and rapids have been a source of relatively cheap,
                   accessible power throughout the history of the city. The river and the
                   access it provided to Lake Ontario have also been key to establishing
                   shipping as an industry in this area. Early settlements which were the
                   forerunners of the City of Rochester all began in this area because of the
                   proximity to the Genesee River and,lake Ontario. These settlements are
                   shown on MAP 11-3 on Page 11-10.








                                                     11-9

































                                                                                                                                                                                                                wee
                                                                                                                                                                                                       'o













                                                                                                                                               -WUUL--,,



                                                                                                                                                                                                                       14.

                                                                               It ,,g foli                      -Aft
                                                                                                     ccra

                                                                                                                       OF
                                                                                                                                                           SAW BovA


                                                                                                                                                                 fin i
                                                                                                                                                                                           Wits        I



                                                                                     Dun- 19AM


                                                                                                                                                                                             @-J



                                                              Lhooln Pgrk                                     Is












                                                                                                                                     14AP H-3
                                                                                                                 EARLY ROCHESTER SETTLEMENTS



                                                                                                                                          11-10










             B.     Early Rochester's waterfront

                    The abundance of fish and game drew the Seneca Indians to the shore of the
                    Genesee River in the years prior to the arrival of the white man.        In
                    1789, Indian Allen, attracted by the potential energy source of the rapids
                    and falls, built the first mill in the area.    This was the first white
                    settlement in what is now Rochester's central business district (CBD). It
                    was not a permanent settlement, however, and lasted only a year. Three
                    years later, in 1792, another settlement sprang up on the river. William
                    Hincher, his wife, and their eight children settled at the mouth of the
                    Genesee River on the site of Rochester's present day port. This settle-
                    ment eventually became known as the Village of Charlotte. In 1797, Gideon
                    King and Zadock Granger settled King's Landing, later known as Hanford's
                    Landing, on the west shore of the river, at the current site of Eastman
                    Kodak Company's treatment plant. This area became an important shipping
                    settlement.

                    The Village of Carthage was established on the east bank of the river in
                    1817. While Hanford's Landing and Carthage competed for shipping commerce
                    from Lake Ontario, Colonel Nathaniel Rochester and several partners bought
                    a 100 acre tract of land south of the Upper Falls. Their tract was the
                    nucleus of the Village of Rochesterville which was chartered in 1817.

                    As a result of the completion of the Erie Canal in 1823 and Rochester's
                    new link with the Hudson River, the city's population boomed, growing from
                    5,400 in 1826 to 50,000 by 1860. The river was crucial to this develop-
                    ment, as a source of power to run the many saw mills and flour mills.
                    Schooners bringing wheat from Canada could navigate up the river to the
                    Lower Falls. The milled flour would then be shipped to New York City via
                    the canal system.   The shipping industry on the lake soon flourished,
                    making the Port of Rochester one of several important ports on the Great
                    .Lakes for both trade and shipbuilding.

                    The river and the lake have also provided significant recreational oppor-
                    tunities during the city's history. In the 19th Century, sidewheelers and
                    other excursion boats evolved into a popular past time, with scheduled day
                    trips departing regularly from Glen House near the Lower Falls. As time
                    went on, other large boats provided excursions along the lake and to
                    Canada.

                    The Village of Charlotte was a major tourist destination from the late
                    1880's to approximately 1915.     An amusement park, several hotels and
                    resort facilities were developed in Charlotte and attracted many visitors
                    and summer residents to the area.     The beach area in Charlotte became
                    known as the "Coney Island of the West" during this time.

                    As other forms of transportation and power began to be developed, the
                    importance of the Genesee River and Lake Ontario to the city began to
                    decline. Over the years, dumping of industrial waste and municipal sewage
                    into the river and lake resulted in a decline in the use of the lake and
                    river as a recreational resource.










              C.    Waterfront rediscove

                    During the last 15 years, the Genesee River and Lake Ontario have been
                    rediscovered by city residents. As a result of stricter environ-mental
                    controls, the efforts of private industry and completion of several major
                    public works projects, the water quality of the river and lake have
                    improved significantly. Because of this, the city's water resources can
                    once again be enjoyed and appreciated. These areas provide opportunities
                    for hiking, sightseeing, fishing, swimming and boating, all within the
                    city limits. The river has been stocked with trout and salmon, and sport
                    fishing has been revitalized. Ontario Beach Park was reopened for public
                    bathing in the late 19701s. The reopening of the beach has encouraged a
                    new appreciation of and     interest in Rochester's water resources among
                    city residents. The City of Rochester's sesquicentennial celebration in
                    1984 centered around the waterfront and included a tall ships visit to the
                    port area, as well as tens of thousands of visitors to the port and beach
                    area during the event.

               4. GEOLOGIC HISTORY

              The City of Rochester rests on the Erie-Ontario Lowland, a relatively flat-lying
              plain, at an altitude of about 500 feet above mean sea level (msl).              The
              principal geologic features within the LWRP boundary are the old and more recent
              courses of the Genesee River, and the lake ridge or former shore of glacial Lake
              Iroquois. The high point of land in the area, now known as Ridge Road, is the
              southern edge of the giant Lake Iroquois, which was the last of a series of
              glacial lakes which once covered the entire Great Lakes Basin.

              Before the last glacier retreated roughly 10,000 years ago, the Genesee River
              flowed in a more easterly course, through what is now Irondequoit Bay, before
              emptying into the Ontario River, a westward flowing river which predates Lake
              Ontario.   As the glacier retreated, the course was shifted near the Town of
              Hendon to i ts present course. The modern course carved out the three waterf al I s
              within Rochester and the steeply sloped river gorge which begins just north of
              the CBD and continues on to Lake Ontario.     Elevations in this area range from
              about 490 feet above sea level at the Upper Falls, to 250 feet above sea level
              at Lake Ontario.

              The Genesee River gorge in Rochester exposes the preglacial rock record and
              provides a unique resource for geologic study. Between the Upper Falls and the
              Lower Falls (a distance of about 1.5 rivermiles), the rock strata or layers date
              back approximately 400 million years and include a classic section of Silurian
              aged rock. At least 200 species of marine fossils have been identified along
              this stretch of river, indicating that this area was once part of an inland sea.

              The oldest rock in this area is the Queenston Formation, which forms the base
              layer or stratum. The next stratum is about 50 feet thick and is known as the
              Grimsby Formation or Red Medina Sandstone.      This rock is used extensively as
              building material throughout the Rochester area.      Other distinctively colored
              strata include the nearly white Thorold Sandstone or Kodak formation, which
              separates underlying red shale from a 20 foot exposure of green Maplewood Shale.
              These two strata can be viewed about halfway up the west side of the gorge from

                                                     11-12








             the Rochester Gas and Electric Company (RG&E) service road just north of the
             Lower Falls. The Kodak Formation forms the cap rock, or hard layer at the top
             of the Lower Falls. Reynales Limestone, the next, stratum, is about 17 feet thick
             and caps the Middle Falls, providing a base for the floodgates located there.
             At the Upper Falls, the Gorge walls expose an 85 foot layer of dark blue-grey
             Rochester Shale capped by 20 feet of grey Lockport Dolomite Limestone. The gorge
             is listed in several New York State geological field guides, and is used for
             geology trips by schools, colleges and museums in the region.

             5.    EXISTING LAND USES

             A.    Overview

                   The City of Rochester's waterfront revitalization area includes a variety
                   of land uses within approximately 2,800 acres or 4.4 square miles. LWRP
                   land uses are listed in Table II-I on page 11-14. Approximately 62% of
                   the city's waterfront revitalization area is used for recreation, parkland
                   or as open space.      Approximately 20Y. is in residential use, 2% in
                   commercial use, 3% in industrial use and 8% is vacant land. The remaining
                   land is used for transportation or utility purposes. Existing land uses
                   within the LWRP boundary are shown on Map 11-4 on pages 11-15 through 11-
                   17. Because the city's coastal area is primarily urban in nature, there
                   are no agricultural uses existing within the boundary.

             B.    General description

                   The portion of the river included within the LWRP boundary is divided into
                   two distinct segments. The area from Lake Ontario to the begin-ning of
                   the wetlands just south of Riverview Marina is characterized by intensive
                   marina and boating activity and related development. Within this area the
                   river appears to be nothing more than a channel between several large
                   marinas. North of the railroad bridge, however, the river widens to 500
                   feet or more. On the west bank of the river in this area are the remains
                   of the original Village of Charlotte that include several buildings and a
                   rail switching yard. The banks of the river in this area are lined with
                   boat slips. The visual quality is degraded by outdoor storage of boats,
                   and several dilapidated or inappropriate land uses.

                   The remaining portion of the river from the Riverview Marina south to the
                   Middle Falls is characterized by densely wooded steep slopes and the
                   absence of significant shoreline development. Seneca Park, which includes
                   the Seneca Park Zoo, ball fields, and passive recreational facilities
                   occupies most of the eastern river bank and upland area. The western bani
                   includes Maplewood Park, the proposed Lower Falls Park as well as
                   cemeteries and undeveloped open space.

                   The majority of land within the LWRP boundary is currently used for
                   recreational or other open space uses.    Almost all of the four miles of
                   riverfront, from the Middle Falls north to the Turning Basin, are utilized
                   as parkland or cemeteries. Existing parkland along the river includes



                                                   11-13






















                                                                     TABLE II-1


                                                     LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                                 EXISTING LAND USES



                                      TYPE OF USE                                                    TOTAL ACRES


                                      (1) Residential
                                            Medium density                                           526.2
                                            High density                                              37.2
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               563.4

                                      (2) Commercial                                                  48.0
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               48.0

                                      (3) Industrial
                                            Light manufacturing                                       42.6
                                            Industrial park                                           28.8
                                            Sewage treatment                                          15.2
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               85.6

                                      (4) Public/semi-public
                                            Cemeteries                                               323.7
                                            Educational facilities                                    21.5
                                            Other                                                     75.8
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               421.0

                                      (5) Outdoor recreation
                                            Public parks                                            1246.2
                                            Marinas and boat launching sites                          S7.3
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                              1303.5

                                      (6) Utilities
                                            Electric generation and transmission                        2.7
                                            Sewage treatment                                          80.8
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               83.5

                                      (7) Transportation
                                            Streets/highways/expressways                              21.4
                                            Railroads                                                 38.7
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               60.1

                                      (8) Vacant land
                                            Open space                                                29.6
                                            Woodlands                                                204.3
                                                                     SUB-TOTAL                               233.9


                                                                     TOTAL COASTAL ZONE ACREAGE             2800.0






                                                                          11-14






                                                                     LOCAL VATERFRONT
                                                                     REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                                     Rochester, Now York

                                                                     EXISTING LAND& WATER USES
                                                                     Legend


                                                                             RESIDENTIAL
                                                                                Urban                RU
                                ....... ......
                                         .!*N

                                                                             CCWMCIAL
                                                                                General ConTmrcial CG



                                                                             PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC
                                                                             INSTITUTIONS & FACILITIES
                                                                                                     PE
                                                                                Educational
                                                  B
                                                                                Medical & Healt'h    PH
                                                                                Other                PO


                                   . . . . . . . . . ......
                             17
                                                                             INDUSTRIAL
                            7
                                                                                Light                IL
                                                                                Heavy                IR
                                    . .. ..............0-V

                                   0.0
                                                                             RECREATION
                                                                                                     OS
                                                          YL                    Beaches & Pools
                                                                                Marinas & Boat
                                                                                 Launching Sites     OB
                                                                                Other                ox




                          ......... .. ...
                                                                             TRANSPORTATION
                                                                                Railway Facilities   TR
                                                                                Other                Tx



                      .. ..... .....
                                                                             UTILITIES & COMMUNICATIONS
                                                                                Electric Generation
                                                                                  & Transmission     UE
                                                                                Sewage Treatment     us



                              OX - P                                         VACANT



                                                                        ownership: State(S), Other
                                                                        Public(P), Private(V) eg. OS-p

                                      ox-
                                                                      Departnierit of Convmwdty DWA**Mnt
                  . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                             Match Uns A              Bureau of Plard*19 and Zoning
                                                                     1,000, 0          2, 00(f
                                                  MAP 11-4
                                          -LWRP EXISITNG LAND USES
                                                                       scale



                                                                      ".Ww@ ow"M-W f"Ww." few to G"uwf VW ON
                                                                          ft@ -Wwv@. @Mw_ - - AN AM.PM. 'Wuft@
                                                                           ftr -@ C.4"" A- I'm -.913. 0









             6
                                                                                                               Existing Land & Water Uses






                                                                                                                -Match Line A
                                                        Y

                                                                            .............


                                                                                     .............
                                                                     ...............                       y

                                                                   ...........
                                                                  ............
                                                                     ..................





                            Jftmwu@








                                          _e=j













                                                                     . . . . . . . . . . . . .


                                                  r



                                                                                           fk


            6@
                        -7-


                                                                     7,
                                                                                                                                       do
                                             JL.@ sc'ocli



                                                                                                                                      ...........
                                  L
                                                                                                                                                         Tr
                                                                                                             W."




                                                                                                                                         -ft-V
                                           -LJUN&L
                                                                                            lt
                               %,.tuft





                                                              '3
                                                                                                         1


                                                                                      ft                                                       AMILL--


                                                                    Or
                                                                    3  A
                                                                                                                        L
                        -mr  r                                                                                                    L .6

                                           J
                                                                                                   U4  Departs I WN I OtCa=TLx*y Dwelopmrt
                                                                                                       Bumau of Plwdft mW Zorft
                                                                                                        000, o                 2, 00(f
                           MAP   H-4
               LWRP    EXISITNG LAND         USES                                                                                                  N
                                                                                                       scale


                                                     0.                                                '1" me -W mmome fto go qm "m as" ommum of ftm coon"
                               1- 16
                                                                                                                           owniiieime 40 at ;Iva. a 4111111". Foam"
                                                       Q_





                                                                                       ExistIng Land A Woof Uses






                                                                    0 1".4,9,,o

                                      ox- p N
                                           -It







                                                     F.V

                                          a  Z -


                                                   1L


                                                             6x- p                60

                                                                                             7


                                                          A



















                                                                              Dopadnwd Of camuty DewbpTmft
                                                                              Bureau of Plwmft and Zonft
                                                                            1,000, o            2, 00(f
                    MAP 11-4
           LWRP EXISITNG LAND USES                                            scale

                                                                                "m m BMW" "r -ift qw ll@ Iftm* commm" sl'ft@
                                                                                                    Im to mum N'Amo IN
                                                                                        -W.X;.-@Vic -.77,w -
                       11- 17                                                                              dmEmm.








                       Ontario Beach Park, Turning Point Park, and Maplewood Park along the west
                       bank, and Seneca Park along the east bank. Lower Falls Park is proposo       I?d
                       for development along the west bank of the river, adjacent to the Lower             is
                       Falls and just south of the Driving Park Bridge. Riverside Cemetery is
                       located along the west bank of the river, just south of Turning Point
                       Park, in the vicinity of the former St. Bernard's Seminary which is now
                       owned by Eastman Kodak Company.

                       The steep banks of the Genesee River culminate in a gorge that exceeds 200
                       feet in depth in some areas. Located within this gorge, near the Lower
                       Falls, is the Station 5 RUE hydroelectric power plant.           The Veteran's
                       Memorial Bridge carries Route 104 over the Genesee River. Just north of
                       this bridge is a pedestrian bridge which offers specta-cular views of the
                       river gorge, and which was constructed as part of the Combined Sewer
                       Overflow Abatement Program (CSOAP).

                       Further north, at Hanford's Landing, Eastman Kodak Company has built an
                       industrial waste treatment plant. A vacant wooded area on the west side
                       of the river stretches north from Kodak's treatment plant to Turning Point
                       Park.   In this 3/4 mile long area, the uplands beyond the river gorge
                       contain Kodak's Research Laboratories and the former Seminary site. This
                       site was rezoned to an IPO District (Industrial Planned Development) and
                       is being utilized by Kodak as an office and research complex.

                       The east and west river banks are primarily vacant from the Turning Basin
                       north for approximately 3/4 mile. Near Denise Road, the primary land uses
                       again become recreation and open space and continue north to the river
                       mouth for approximately 1.3 miles. Boat slips and private marinas are the
                       major types of waterfront development. Physical access to the shorezone
                       becomes easier in this area, with the exception of a 1/2 mile long section
                       along the west bank which contains railroad tracks. The portion of this
                       area north and south of the Stutson Street Bridge has been purchased by
                       the city.

                       The only existing commercial shipping activity on the river is conducted
                       by the Rochester Portland Cement Company. Ships carrying approxi-mately
                       8,500 tons of cement make weekly trips up the river from the lake,
                       stopping at the company's docking facilities on the west bank of the
                       river, adjacent to Turning Point Park. These ships arrive from Ontario,
                       Canada. There are no commercial fishing facilities or activities on the
                       river at the present time.

                       As one moves away from the gorge rim or riverbank and into the upland
                       areas, land uses become more urban in character.           These uses have no
                       physical connection with the river.           Actually, the river all but
                       disappears from view in these areas. Residential uses predominate in the
                       upland areas, with some commercial and industrial development located
                       along major streets or at major street intersections. In addition, there
                       are two large cemeteries in the upland areas on the west side of the
                       river, approximately halfway between downtown and the lake.





                                                         11-18







                   The major portion of lake frontage within the city's LWRP boundary is
                   designated as public parkland. Ontario Beach Park is located at the mouth
                   of the Genesee River and contains approximately 2,100 feet of lake
                   frontage. Park facilities include a bathhouse, a large public beach area,
                   a bandstand and several picnic pavilions.    Durand-Eastman Park, located
                   several miles to the east, contains over 7,600 feet of lake frontage.
                   This area also included a public beach, at one time. The remaining lake
                   frontage within the LWRP boundary is in residential use and includes the
                   4,000 feet of shoreline to the west of Ontario Beach Park.

             6.    WATER-DEPENDENT AND VATER-MANCED USES

             A.    Overview and definitions

                   Water-dependent land uses are structures or economic activities that
                   cannot exist without a waterfront location such as marinas, boat ramps,
                   sewage treatments plants, etc. Water-enhanced land uses are struc-tures
                   or economic activities that increase their value or importance because of
                   their proximity to a shoreline.    Frequently, they function as support
                   services for water-dependent uses and could include parks and other
                   recreational facilities, as well as some types of commercial development.

             B.    Vater-dependent and water-enhanced uses

                   Water-dependent uses along the river     primarily involve recreational
                   activities such as boating and fishing.   The river is navigable by power
                   boats and sail boats for the five miles from Lake Ontario to the Lower
                   Falls area.   The river has a mature warm water fish population and has
                   significant trout and salmon runs in the spring and fall.     Thus, it is
                   used for fishing as well as for pleasure boating.

                   The steep slopes along the river gorge make development and access
                   extremely difficult in most locations. Because of this, these areas are
                   largely undeveloped and remain in their wooded state.      Water-enhanced,
                   passive recreational activiti-es such as hiking and bird watching are the
                   primary uses within these areas. North of Turning Point Park, the upland
                   areas drop closer to river level and significant wetlands begin to line
                   the shoreline on both banks.     Further north, near the Stutson Street
                   Bridge, private marinas line the river shoreline. In this area, the river
                   is primarily used for water-dependent activities such as boating, fishing
                   and other types of recreation. The Genesee Lighthouse which was built in
                   1821, the U.S. Coast Guard Station, two vacant warehouses, a public boat
                   launch, and a railroad swing bridge are also located in this area.

                   There are several industrial uses located along the river that are also
                   water -dependent. The RGH Station 5 hydroelectric plant and Eastman Kodak
                   Company's industrial waste treatment plant are dependent on the river for
                   power as well as for processing water.     The Rochester Portland Cement
                   Plant, located on the west bank across from Rattlesnake Point, is
                   dependent on the river for its shipping operations.





                                                  11-19








                       The   lakeshore   area   supports   water-dependent     and    water-enhanced
                       recreational uses such as boating and fishing.           Public bathing is
                       permitted at Ontario Beach Park.      Public bathing also takes place at
                       Durand-Eastman Park.      Picnicking and other water-enhanced passive
                       recreational activities are also supported at each park.

                       In summary, existing water-dependent uses are located in several areas
                       within the city's LWRP boundary. These uses include:

                             the Portland Cement Company, located on the west river bank, within
                             Turning Point Park;
                             Eastman Kodak's waste treatment facility, located on the west river
                             bank, near Hanford Landing and just north of the Veteran's Memorial
                             Bridge;
                             various marinas, boat slips and docks located along the east and
                             west banks of the river, including the Rochester Yacht Club, the
                             Genesee Yacht Club, Shumway Marina, Pelican Bay Marina, Voyager
                             Marina, and the Riverview Marina (including the Spirit of Rochester
                             tour boat);
                             the Monroe County Boat Launch located on the Port Authority Site,
                             along the west bank of the river, just north of the railroad swing
                             bridge;
                             bathing beaches located at Ontario Beach Park and Durand-Eastman
                             Park; and
                             RG&Els Station 5 hydroelectric power plant.

                       Existing water-enhanced uses are also located in several areas within the
                       city's LWRP boundary. These uses include:

                             public parks (Ontario Beach Park, Turning Point Park, Seneca Park,
                             Maplewood Park, and Lower Falls Park); and
                             various commercial uses along River Street, just north of the
                             Stutson Street Bridge.

                C.     Market demand for new uses

                       Water-dependent uses which are appropriate for and compatible in the
                       city's waterfront areas include marinas, a boatel, boat slips and docks,
                       and boat launching ramps. Water-enhanced uses which are appropriate for
                       and compatible in these areas include recreational facilities, some types
                       of commercial     development and hotel, motel         or bed-and-breakfast
                       facilities.

                       Future demand within the LWRP boundary for water-dependent uses such as
                       marinas and boat slips was investigated as part of a land use and
                       marketing study of the Port of Rochester site completed for the city in
                       1986 by a consultant team. The Rochester Port and River Street Area Land
                       Use/Marketability Study concluded that the Rochester harbor at the mouth
                       of the Genesee River was a premium location for marina development due to
                       its deep water, excellent access to Lake Ontario and the availability of
                       land.  The study indicated that there was sufficient demand within the
                       region to accommodate up to new 300 slips at a full service marina at the
                       port site. The majority of these slips would be for boats in the 16'-251


                                                        11-20







                   size range, with a smaller number of slips reserved for boats over 26' in
                   length. The study said that up to 1M. of the slips could be reserved for
                   daily rentals to provide dockage for visiting boats.

                   A detailed analysis of both current and projected demand for boat slips on
                   Lake Ontario, the Genesee River and Irondequoit Bay was completed as part
                   of the study. This analysis showed that there was a deficit of approxi-
                   mately 300 slips for medium-sized boats through 1987 and sufficient demand
                   for approximately 120 more slips by 1990 within the region. The extent of
                   the boating market within the Rochester/Monroe County area was based on
                   current and projected supplies of boat slips from Oak Orchard to Fair
                   Haven, including the   Rochester harbor and Irondequoit Bay, along with
                   current and projected demand for boat slips by Monroe County residents
                   through 1990.

                   The study indicated that demand for winter storage of boats at the
                   Rochester harbor would continue and that any potential marina developed at
                   the port site should include both indoor and outdoor storage facilities
                   for boats.    Dry-stacking of boats involves outdoor storage of smaller
                   pleasure boats for use whenever the owner desires.     The study indicated
                   that dry-stacking facilities should not be considered for the port site
                   because of the large amounts of land required and the high volumes of
                   parking generated by such a use.

                   Additional demand data for water-dependent and water-enhanced uses along
                   the river corridor were developed as part of the River Harbor Redevelop-
                   ment Area Design/Feasibility Study prepared in 1989 by the Reimann-
                   Buechner Partnership. This study is included as an appendix to the City
                   of Rochester's LWRP.       The market information prepared by Phoenix
                   Associates, Inc.     for that study related to the development of new
                   water-enhanced commercial and residential uses along the Genesee River.
                   Another study completed by Phoenix Associates in 1987 and entitled
                   Discovery Center Feasibility study summarized visitation estimates for a
                   maritime museum or interpretive center which could be constructed in one
                   of the warehouses on the port site.       These two reports included the
                   following data and conclusions:

                          Visitation estimates for a maritime museum or interpretive center
                          located adjacent to the Genesee River at the port site range between
                          60,000 and 115,000, depending on the scale,          offerings and
                          seasonality of the facility.       These estimates were based on
                          visitation at Ontario Beach Park, regional attractions and other
                          similar Great Lakes facilities.

                          Such a facility could potentially provide: a destination point for
                          drawing county and regional visitors to the city's waterfront; the
                          foundation for an expanded year-round market for existing and
                          proposed commercial development in the area; and, an oppor-tunity
                          for the city to demonstrate to the development community its
                          commitment to the waterfront area through active promotion of such
                          a facility.




                                                   11-21








                            If the city's River Harbor area remains a seasonal attraction,
                            non-food retail space should be programed at no more than 10,000
                            square feet, particularly considering some of the vacant or
                            marginally used commercial space currently scattered throughout the
                            area.   If the River Harbor area becomes a year-round activity
                            center, additional specialty retail space could be programmed at up
                            to 30,000 square feet, over time.

                            Based on current housing market studies, an estimate of the drawing
                            capacity of the River Harbor area, and a realization of the city's
                            commitment to develop new housing in other areas, new residential
                            construction in the River Street area near the Genesee River should
                            be limited to no more than 80 units over a five year period.

                            A hotel or motel in the River Harbor area is more likely to be
                            feasible when and if the area becomes a year-round attraction, and
                            when the level of activity at the visitor's marina becomes more of
                            a known quanti ty. A seasonal hotel or motel f aci I i ty i s more 1 i kel y
                            to occur in tandem with another primary use such as a
                            restaurant/bar.

                     The Monroe County Waterfront Recreational Opportunities Stud completed in
                     September, 1989 by Environmental Design/Research contained the following
                     market demand data and conclusions related to the City of Rochester's
                     LWRP:

                            Based on trends in boater registration, it is estimated that there
                            is a current deficit of around 350 slips in Monroe County.         Most
                            marinas are at capacity and have waiting lists. Nearly all marinas
                            and yacht clubs surveyed indicated that they could easily rent more
                            slips if they could offer them.

                            Demand for additional slips is expected to grow in the future, based
                            on registration trends.     Ownership of boats in Monroe County has
                            grown by 6,000 boats, or 30%, in the past 10 years. The projected
                            resident demand for slip space in Monroe County, through 1992, is
                            675 slips in the 161-251 range and 205 slips for larger boats.

                            There currently are only 20 designated transient slips in Monroe
                            County along the Lake Ontario shoreline. However, yacht clubs and
                            marinas have a policy of renting slips by the day when resident
                            boats are out sailing or cruising. Nevertheless, visitor slips are
                            very scarce throughout the area.

                            No reliable statistics from Canadian authorities or New York State
                            agencies are available for the number of boats capable of or
                            inclined to cross or cruise Lake Ontario.          Conversations with
                            Canadian port authorities, other New York State planning departments
                            and marina owners and operators indicate a strong demand for more
                            visitor slips, although the amount of this demand cannot be
                            quantified. Private development of visitor slips seems unlikely due
                            to their lower profitability in comparison to rental by the season.



                                                       11-22







                           The current demand within Monroe County for improved launch ramps
                           for trailered boats was estimated, based on current registrations
                           and patterns of boat usage. Current resident demand is 30 lanes of
                           launch capacity at 40 boats per lane, or a deficit of 8 launch
                           ramps.   Current deficits in slip space exacerbate the deficit in
                           launch capacity.    This does not take into account non-resident
                           demand, which adds 2 lanes at present utilization rates.

                           From estimates of five-year registration increases in boats 161-25'
                           and decreases in boats under 161, future demand for launch ramps to
                           serve trailered resident boats is 7 lanes of additional launch
                           capacity through 1992.       Additional launch capacity would be
                           appropriate in the Rochester Harbor/Lower Genesee River area to
                           provide for additional lake access.

                           Rochester has the highest use/capacity ratio for swimming in New
                           York State, with the exception of New York City.          This figure
                           demonstrates a need for additional swimming facilities within Monroe
                           County.   Durand-Eastman Park offers opportunities for increased
                           public beach and swimming areas.

              7.     RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND PUBLIC ACCESS

              A.     Recreational opportunities (public Parkland)

                     Lake Ontario and the Genesee River offer many outdoor recreational
                     opportunities such as swimming, boating and fishing as well as passive
                     recreational activities. According to the Coast Guard, the river main-
                     tains a depth of approximately 10 feet as far south as the Veteran's
                     Memorial Bridge. This permits a variety of small pleasure boats to use
                     the river. Canoeists and kayak enthusiasts are able to continue up the
                     river as far south as Seth Green Island. Beyond Seth Green Island, swift
                     river currents make upstream travel difficult. The natural river depth is
                     maintained in the port area by annual dredging operations conducted by the
                     U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The dredging operations ensure a
                     river depth of approximately 21 feet which permits access up the river for
                     large recreational craft.

                     Berthing or mooring in the river is not possible for all the boat owners.
                     Although the port area has a number of marinas and yacht clubs that
                     contain approximately 1,000 boat slips, this does not meet present demand.
                     Rochester and Monroe County have been nationally identified as a market
                     with tremendous growth potential in boat sales, particularly in the
                     161-251 range.    While many marina owners would like to expand their
                     facilities along the river, development costs and the lack of land for
                     expansion and parking have become major limitations.

                     Owners of smaller trailered boats are also experiencing launching and
                     docking problems in the area. Only one public boat launch exists within
                     the LWRP boundary. The four-lane boat launching ramp constructed at the
                     port site by Monroe County has the capacity to accommodate 107 cars with
                     trailers. Renewed interest in sport fishing has increased the use of this
                     facility. However, the location of the launch on the west bank north of


                                                      11-23








                     the railroad swing bridge has made maintenance of the ramp a continuous
                     and costly concern because of a significant river surge problem that is
                     eroding and undermining-the launch area.

                     The west breakwall and pier at the mouth of the river are often used for
                     fishing and provide direct public access to the river. The east breakwall
                     and pier adjacent to the Coast Guard Station are periodically closed for
                     security reasons. The east and west piers have been improved by the USACE
                     and are generally in good condition. The portion of the west pier south
                     of the beach area has experienced severe undermining and erosion in the
                     past due to major winter storms.       The east pier has varying surface
                     conditions and is not as suitable for public access.          The Corps has
                     completed all repairs on the east and west breakwaters and has no plans
                     for any additional repairs in the foreseeable future.

                     Formal recreation opportunities within the LWRP boundary are provided at
                     a number of public parks.     The location, facilities, special features,
                     estimated usage and development opportunities of each public park or open
                     space area within the LWRP are listed below (see Map 11-5 on pages 11-25
                     through 11-27).

                     (1)    DURAND-EASTMAN PARK (965 Acres):

                            Location:          On Lake Ontario, west of Irondequoit Bay and east
                                               of the Genesee River; the park can be entered
                                               from Lakeshore Boulevard and Kings Highway.

                            Facilities:        Hiking, bridle, and cross-country ski trails; 7
                                               picnic shelters; playground area; winter warming
                                               shelter and riding stable; 18-hole golf course,
                                               golf clubhouse with food concession and pro shop;
                                               parking permitted on park roads.


                            Special
                            features:          Steep wooded slopes; valleys; scenic vistas;
                                               small lakes and ponds; on Lake Ontario; botanical
                                               collections. Portions of the park make up part
                                               of the Monroe County Arboretum. Spring flowering
                                               trees and spectacular fall foliage colors make
                                               this park an area of exceptional beauty. Unique
                                               topography and soils permit the growing of plants
                                               not native to the area.

                            Estimated
                            Usage:             Not available.

                            Development
                            Opportunities:     Development of beach area for swimming (park is
                                               currently       undergoing    a   phased     capital
                                               improvement project totalling $5.1 million).




                                                      11-24






                                                                             LOCAL VATERFRONT
                                                                             REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                                             Rochester, Now York


                                                                             Legend


                                                                             1 ONTARIO BEACH PARK

                                                                             2 TURNING POINT PARK

                                                                             3 SENECA PARK

                                                                             4 MAPLEWOOD PARK

                                                                             5 LOWER FALLS PARK

                                                                             6 SETH GREEN DRIVE AREA

                                                                             7 DURAND-EASTMAN PARK

                                                               -zzz,.




















            Jill














                          iLII






                         L
                          W-




            C;kr
                4f-                             match Lim A                  Oepartnwt of Commnity Dealolynant
                                                                             Bureau of Planning and Zoning
        z77
                                                  MAP 11-5                 1, 00(f 0          2, 00(f
                                             LOCATIONS OF    PUBLIC
                                                                             scale
                                           PARKLAND WITHIN    THE  LWRP


                                                                             ff" .10 ft propend tw %ft ft. @ am@ moomm 69 SLAM C@"
                                                                             ---- "-- -m     dmmt@ t"m m affma W %.a ft
                                                                             C*ft " ftm@ mmv@. pm@ Qm@ am Aum"mm
                                                     11-25                   PM= 40.9 tre C@ @.Wmmm- @ a





















                                                                                                                    Match Lone A
























                                                                               y















                                 .WWI                 'C@ rf,
                                                   I rim









                                                                                             sum

                                              4



                                                                                                                                  'up-

                                                                                                    LAL2mL%-a


                                               ar
                                                       @.5@ FL-
                               -to q.

                            7  T


                                                                                                    Departnwt at CMTMN*Y
                      --S 7=
                                                                                                    BLweaj of PIMV*lg and Z
                                4
                                                                                                 -110001 0
                              MAP   11-5                                                                                   2, 00(t
                        LOCATIONS OF PUBLIC
                     PARKLAND WITHIN THE LWRP                                                       scalo


                                                                                                         -w One== ftr an mm "m ft@ a@   ftim, amom
                                                                                                          "oww @ 1-mm"LL oiiimI@ oviiiiiiio an am= ".
                                                                                                              "ou@- fm@ anwas IM Ammmww Ammom,..
                                                                                                         'MW cft Q-- -m f@ an W L073.
                                 11-26























                                                           0
                                                                 '9"0












                                                                                         I














                          L7                                           _%;oval



                            ri
                         rl









                                                                   Department of Community Dralopment
                                                                   Bureau of Plannft and Zonft
                 MAP 11-5                                         1,00(y 0         2, 000'
             LOCATIONS OF PUBLIC
                                                  V: @zz























          PARKLAND WITHIN THE LWRP                                 scale

                                                                   rr" me = ampow fte tM vm 9@ el stm aNsw

                        27                                               as G"w" an swralmm 4" so Ma. a domews.
                                                                   cam& ommo.








                     (2)   KAPLEWOOD PARK AKD ROSE GARDEN (14 acres)

                           Location:           West side of the Genesee River, from Driving Park
                                               Avenue north to Hanford Landing Road; rose garden
                                               located at the intersection of Lake Avenue and
                                               Driving Park Avenue; park can be entered from
                                               Driving Park Avenue, Maplewood Avenue, Maplewood
                                               Drive, and Bridge View Drive as well as from
                                               various pedestrian trails.

                           Facilities:         Informal picnicking and strolling areas; tennis
                                               courts; fishing areas; parking area provided off
                                               Bridge View Drive; parking area for rose garden
                                               provided along park entrance drive from Driving
                                               Park Avenue.

                           Special
                           features:           Pond located in lower Maplewood Park area; scenic
                                               views and vistas of Genesee River gorge and
                                               Veteran's Memorial Bridge; the rose garden, one
                                               of the largest in the country (selected by the
                                               American Rose Society as an "All American Rose
                                               Test Gardenu; peak blooms in late June and
                                               September);   several   overlooks   that     provide
                                               spectacular views of the Genesee River gorge.

                           Estimated
                           Usage:              Not available.

                           Development
                           Opportunities:      Improved access to gorge for hiking and
                                               fishing.


                     (3)   LOWER FALLS PARK (3 acres):

                           Location:           Proposed park to be located on the west bank of
                                               the Genesee River south of the Driving Park
                                               Bridge, overlooking the Lower Falls area; access
                                               to the park will be provided via Driving Park
                                               Avenue.

                           Facilities:         Currently an undeveloped area.      Potenti al uses
                                               could include picnic areas and shelters, river
                                               overlooks, pedestrian and hiking trails, and
                                               other passive recreational facilities.

                           Special
                           features:           Spectacular views of Lower Falls and river gorge;
                                               remains of various historic structures evident in
                                               some areas.





                                                      11-28









                            Estimated
                            Usage:              Park is currently undeveloped.

                            Development
                            Opportunities:      Historic/archaeologic resources; scenic views and
                                                vistas of lower and middle falls; pedestrian and
                                                biking trails.

                     (4)    ONTARIO BEACH PARK (39 acres):

                            Location:           Northern-most portion of the city; on Lake
                                                Ontario, at the mouth of the Genesee River; park
                                                can be entered from Lake and Beach Avenues.

                            Facilities:         Public beach; bathhouse; 6 picnic shelters; food
                                                concession stand; outdoor performance pavilion;
                                                ice-skating rink; historic carousel; parking
                                                areas for approximately 1,500 cars on the port
                                                site to the south and within an area south of
                                                Beach Avenue and west of Lake Avenue; soccer
                                                field and 2 softball fields located in an area to
                                                the south, along Estes Street.

                            Special
                            features:           One of the best natural sand beaches on Lake
                                                Ontario; supervised swimming areas; boat launch
                                                on the Genesee River; antique Dentzel Carousel
                                                designated as a City of Rochester Historic
                                                Landmark.

                            Estimated
                            Usage:              800,000 visits / year

                            Development
                            Opportunities:      Enhancement of beach area; rehabilitation of
                                                bathhouse    and    pier;   redesign     of    existing
                                                bandstand;      improvements      to      circulation;
                                                coordination with events and facilities on Port
                                                of Rochester site (park is currently undergoing a
                                                phased capital improvement project totalling $6.7
                                                million).

                     (5)    SENECA PARK (297 acres):

                            Location:           Eastern bank of the Genesee River, north and
                                                south of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge; park can
                                                be entered from St.      Paul Street, just north of
                                                Route 104 (Ridge Road East).

                            Facilities:         Outdoor     swimming      pool     with      bathhouse;
                                                playgrounds; softball    fields; 2 picnic shelters;
                                                hiking trails; marked    nature and jogging trails;



                                                        11-29








                                               zoo; parking area adjacent to zoo and along lower
                                               park road.

                            Special
                            features:          Seneca Park Zoo; pond; steep wooded slopes along
                                               the river bank; wetlands; scenic views of the
                                               Genesee River gorge; park was originally designed
                                               by Frederick Law Olmstead.

                            Estimated
                            Usage:             Not available.

                            Development
                            Opportunities:     Enhancement of Olmstead Plan; improved access to
                                               river    gorge    for    hiking    and     fishing;
                                               rehabilitation of zoo and public pool (park is
                                               currently undergoing a phased capital improvement
                                               project totalling $3.9 million).

                     (6)    SETH GREEN DRIVE AREA (2.3 acres/part of Seneca Park):

                            Location:          Eastern bank of the Genesee River; enter from St.
                                               Paul Street; area runs from Norton Street north
                                               to Seneca Towers.

                            Facilities:        Undeveloped open space area used for passive
                                               recreation; I'switchback trail" provides access to
                                               river gorge for fishing.



                            Special
                            features:          8Switchback trail" on steep wooded slopes along
                                               river provide spectacular views of Veteran's
                                               Memorial Bridge and river gorge.

                            Estimated
                            Usage:             Not applicable.

                            Development
                            Opportunities:     Scenic views and vistas; pedestrian or hiking
                                               trails; improved fishing access.

                      (7)   TURNING POINT PARK (100 acres):

                            Location:          West bank of the Genesee River, just south of the
                                               Turning Basin; park can be entered from Lake
                                               Avenue via Boxart Street; park borders Riverside
                                               Cemetery to south.

                            Facilities:        Relatively undeveloped; hiking trails (connection
                                               to Lake Avenue); picnic areas; fishing piers and



                                                      11-30








                                              dock; birdwatching; parking area at end of Boxart
                          Special             Street, at entrance to park.
                          features:           Park provides access to the water's edge for
                                              fishing and canoeing; park provides spectacular
                                              views of river gorge and Turning Basin-, small
                                              waterfalls.

                          Estimated
                          Usage:              Hot available.

                          Development
                          Opportunities:      Scenic views and vistas; pedestrian or hiking
                                              trails; improved fishing access.

                    (8)   TRYON PARK (82  acres):

                          Location:           Adjacent to Irondequoit Creek and southwestern
                                              edge of the Irondequoit Creek wetlands, just
                                              south of Irondequoit Bay; park can be entered via
                                              Tryon Park Road.

                          Facilities:         Relatively undeveloped; hiking trails;
                                              passive recreational opportunities.


                          Special
                          features:           Steep wooded slopes; wetlands, scenic views and
                                              vistas of the Irondequoit Creek wetlands and
                                              Irondequoit Bay.

                          Estimated
                          Usage:              Not available.

                          Development
                          Opportunities:      Enhancement of scenic views; new hiking and
                                                    biking trails.

                    While not officially designated as parkland, Riverside Cemetery and Holy
                    Sepulchure Cemetery, located just south of Turning Point Park on the west
                    bank of the river, also offer passive recreation opportunities such as
                    hiking, biking and birdwatching.

              B.    Public access

                    With the exception of Durand-Eastman, all of the parks listed above are
                    adequately serviced by public transportation (bus) via either Lake Avenue
                    or St.   Paul Street. Adequate parking is available at all of the sites
                    with the exception of Ontario Beach Park where overflow parking is a
                    problem during peak periods of summertime weekend use.




                                                     11-31








                    The CSOAP project, which involved construction of underground holding
                    tunnels to reduce the water quality impacts of the city's combined storm
                    and sanitary sewer system in certain areas, included the construction of
                    a pedestrian walkway across the river, just north of the Veteran's
                    Memorial bridge. This walkway links Seneca Park with Maplewood Park and
                    provides unique physical and visual access to the river gorge for
                    pedestrians and handicapped persons.

                    Within the LWRP, direct public access to the water is limited, despite the
                    many public parks and open space areas. The problem with providing direct
                    public access to much of the city's waterfront is complicated by the
                    topography of the areas involved.     These areas include heavily wooded
                    steep slopes which become more difficult to traverse as one moves south
                    from the mouth of the river to the Lower Falls area.        Even i f better
                    access to the river could be provided in certain areas, the safety of
                    potential users would remain a significant issue.

                    On the east side of the river, Seneca Park has a variety of hiking trails
                    that provide access along the rim of the river gorge and to the river
                    itself via "switchback trailsu. Direct pedestrian access to the river on
                    the east side is only possible from Seth Green Drive, located just south
                    of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge, and from an RUE service road located
                    just north of the Driving Park Bridge.

                    Along the west bank, direct access to the river is possible from Turning
                    Point Park, although visual access is provided from a variety of sites
                    including Riverside Cemetery and Maplewood Park.      Some informal trails
                    exist along the east and west banks of the river, particularly near the
                    Driving Park Bridge.     Fishermen use these trails for access to prime
                    fishing areas along the river. Hastings Street, located just south of the
                    bridge, leads to Lower Falls Park and provides access to an open area with
                    spectacular views which runs from the Lower Falls southward to the Middle
                    Falls. A formal hiking trail has also been developed in Maplewood Park
                    from the Veteran's Memorial Bridge to the Kodak Park area.

                    Ontario Beach Park,    with its long sandy beach, provides direct public
                    access to Lake Ontario. However, few public trails or walkways exist for
                    passive recreation use along the lake shoreline. A small public lakefront
                    sidewalk currently exists along Beach Avenue between Clematis and
                    Cloverdale Streets.

              8.    HISTORIC RESOURCES

              Because Rochester began and grew along the Genesee River, there are many historic
              resources within the city's LWRP. These include archaeological sites, a local
              Preservation District, local, state and national landmarks, and a number of
              properties eligible for landmark designation.

              In 1986, the Rochester Museum and Science Center prepared the Cultural Resources
              Inventory for the City of Rochester LWRP.       This report identified 21 known
              archaeological sites, seven historic Euro-american archaeological sites, two
              landmarks listed on the National and State Registers of Historic Places, and



                                                    11-32







              three locally-designated landmarks.       In April, 1987, the Beach Avenue
              Preservation District was designated, pursuant to the city's zoning ordinance.
              The Genesee Lighthouse, at 70 Lighthouse Street, is perhaps the most historically
              significant site within the LWRP and gives an indication of the wealth of
              resources in this area of the City of Rochester.     The site is listed on the
              National and State Registers of Historic Places, is a local landmark, contains
              the remains of the first lightkeeper's house (c.     1822), was the site of the
              cabin of the first permanent Euro-american settler in what was to become
              Rochester, and contains evidence of American Indian occupation.

              Table 11-2 on page 11-34 illustrates the various historic and      archaeological
              resources that exist within the LWRP boundary.

              9.    VISUAL QUALITY

              A.    Overview

                    Rochester's coastal area has a variety of unique topographical features
                    including waterfalls, a river gorge, ravines, and several small river
                    islands. Several breathtaking views and vistas are found throughout the
                    city's waterfront revitalization area and enhance the city's urban
                    environment. Significant scenic views and vistas within the city's LWRP
                    are shown on Map 11-6 on pages 11-35 through 11-37.

              B.    Description

                    The beach and port area dominate the land use pattern in the extreme
                    northern portion of the city's waterfront revitalization area and
                    contribute to the overall visual quality of that area.      An exceptional
                    view of the lake and mouth of the river can be seen as one drives north on
                    Lake Avenue, past the Conrail railroad bridge.       However, some of the
                    cluttered, underutilized or dilapidated land uses    along the Lake Avenue
                    commercial strip detract from the aesthetics of the area.

                    Moving south from the port along the river, several spectacular views and
                    vistas exist but are not easily accessible. A river overlook along the
                    southern map approach to the Veteran's Memorial Bridge offers tremendous
                    views of the river gorge and the eastern riverbank.         Several vacant
                    properties along St. Paul Street, on the eastern side of the river, also
                    offer panoramic views and vistas of the river gorge and the western
                    riverbank.

                    RG&Els Station 5 hydroelectric plant at the Lower Falls provides good
                    views of the river in the spring and early summer.       During the summer
                    months, however, dense foliage obscures this view.     Further north, near
                    Kodak's research laboratories, is an area that could provide a spectacular
                    river overlook, if developed properly.

                    Seneca Park, located along the river's eastern bluff, provides an
                    excellent view of the river's wetlands and wooded slopes.        Seneca and
                    Maplewood Parks are connected via a pedestrian bridge which crosses the



                                                    11-33












                                                 TABLE 11-2

                                 LOCAL WATERFRONT-REVITALIZATION PROGRAM


                               CULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES WITHIN THE LWRP



                Properties listed On the National and State Registers of Historic Places:

                                Genesee Lighthouse - 70 Lighthouse Street
                                 "Shinglesidem (house) - 476 Beach Avenue

                                 Properties designated as local landmarks:

                                Ontario Beach Carousel - Ontario Beach Park
                                 Genesee Lighthouse - 70 Lighthouse Street
                                 St. Bernard's Seminary - 2260 lake Avenue

                         Properties within the Beach Avenue Preservation District:

                  Properties between 480 and 670 Beach Avenue on the north side of street
                                 and 551 Beach Avenue on the south side.

                               Historic Euro-american Archaeological Sites:

                                     Genesee Lighthouse Historic Site
                                   Lower Falls Mill and Industrial Site
                                   Carthage-Brewer's Dock Historic Site
                                  Carthage Flats Mill and Industrial Site
                                          Glen House Historic Site
                                  King's-Hanford's Landing Historic Site
                                    Kelsey's-Buell's Dock Historic Site

                                           Archaeological Sites:

               Twenty-one sites as identified by the Rochester Museum and Science Center.

                               Properties Potentially Eligible to be Listed
                          on the National and State Registers of Historic Places:

                    According to the City of Rochester Historic Resources Survey prepared by
                    Mack Consulting Associates in 1986, two districts and 26 individual
                    properties may meet the criteria for listing on the National and State
                    Registers of Historic Places. The individual properties are, for the most
                    part. clustered on Beach Avenue, Stutson Street. Latta and River Roads,
                    and on Lake Avenue between Driving Park Avenue and Flower City Park. The
                    Ontario Beach Park District is wholly within the LWRP, while approximately
                    half of the Maplewood District falls within the LWRP boundaries (south of
                    Seneca Parkway).





                                                    11-34






             . .....................................
                                .....                                        LOCAL VATERFRONT
                                                                             REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                               ......... ............
                        ...... .....         ..                              Rachestor, Now York

                                                                             NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY
                               ..... .. . ...
                                . ............
                                   . .......................         ....... Lmpnd
                                    :*..,*"*,,*,*"-...*,.*,--.***.-'* ......... 0.,. * * * :::
                                      ....................*............................
                                   .. ................... ................
                                  Av      .......
                                           ...................... :*.* ......................
                                                              ......... .
                                                               .....                 PRIME AGRICULTURAL SOILS
                                             .................. .......
                                                      .....................

                                                         ........... . .
                                                               .. .. .....
                                                         ..........
                                                                                     FRESHWATER WETLANDS



                                                                    ..........
                                                                             U
                                                                                     WILDLIFE HABITATS
                                                                                     SIGNIFICANT FISH and





                                                                                     BEACHES



                                                                                     UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHIC/
                                                                                     UEOGRAPHIC FEATURES



                                                                                     SCENIC VISTA

                                                          L2@ -
                     07

                 /*
                                  44



                                     A ...















              C;  L-W@ Ak-1 11                                               Dopartffmt of CAmmx*y 13melopftnt
                                                 Mateh Line A                Buremi of Planning and Zoning
                                                                           1,000, 0            2. 00(f
                                                   MAP 11-6
                                       LWRP  SCENIC VIEWS AND VISTAS         scale


                                                                             -W@ pvwm..m           9= 1@ aff@ .9 'A- ft
                                                                             xwuma @ ---w ca@" Zan pwWasma we al J". 0 mm". ftrAm
                                                        -15
                                        AF







                                                                                                                                    Natural Resorces Inventory





                                                                                                    _v
                                                                                                                                             Match Uns A






























                                          V  W







                                                7L
                                                                                                                      OL

                                                                                                                                             bal- _j

                                                                                                                                                                      lot.'
                                                                                                                                                  L


                                                                                                                                                                                         .46..
                                                                   it
                                                                                                                        --jui




                                                                              W-ftf


                                                                                                                                                                                       Jam


                                                                                                        vi,
                                                                                                                                                                 sum-*=
                                                    L!
                                                                                                                                                                            'OEM
                                                                                                                                               A
                                                  1.,LF

                                                                                                                                                                  "AL
                                                                                                                                      7i

                                                                                                                            Departrnent of Cornrnunity Dew%lopmnt
                                                                                                                            M"au of Plamb and ZonkV
                                         i1L
                                                                                                                                                         2, 00(f
                                    MAP     11-6                                                                                                                                  N
                  LWRP     SCENIC VIEWS AND VISTAS                                                                           scale


                                                                                                                                 w No "MUNN 1w %m      "m OLM aw@ 40 mm cmmBA4
                                                                                                                                                                                mm ffs
                                                                                                                                                                             Am"
                                                                                                                                        we cum"               an           MWOUL OVAOM&
                                        11- 36.1






                                                                                                                                             Natural ReWmes Irwdory






                                                                                                               O'V "4,9,,o

                                                           . ................. . .....
                                                              .............
                                                                            ........... ...


                                                                  ...........
                                                                               ..... ...... .....

                                                            ...................... ...... ....

                                                                      ............. ...   .. .....
                                               ...........

                                                              ..............
                                            ----------                             F W
                                            .........                                                                                 FW
                                                        ...........
                                                           ...........
                                                  . . ............
                                                  ..............    ........          .... ..                            .... ..
                                           7 ........ . .......                                                        .... ..
                                                                                                                                 ............
                                                                                                                                 ............

                                                                                                       ...... . . .......        ...........
                                                                                                       ......      .......


                                                                                                                                 ......... .



                                                                                                                         ow
                                                                                                                                                        .............



                                                                                            'All
                                                                                                                              IN








                                                                                                                                  41"        XXXXX           Xgm










                                                                                                                             Departinarit of Convmx*y
                                                                                                                             Bursas of Plarving and ZwdM
                                    MAP     11-6                                                                           1, 00(f 0                       2, 00(f
                LWRP SCENIC VIEWS                  AND VISTAS           A
                                                                                                                              scale


                                        11-37                                                                                         pmmm "A    9,-Ap*@L 4806"@               me 'Jown









                      river and provides spectacular views of the river gorge.      Kodak's waste
                      water treatment plant on the opposite side of the river detracts from this
                      view, however. The overlook at the end of Boxart Street provides a view
                      of the wooded slopes near Seneca Park and views of the river gorge to the
                      north. Areas within Turning Point Park provide spectacular views of the
                      river and the Turning Basin, as well as the wetland areas along the
                      eastern bank.

                      A footpath that leads down the steep slope at Turning Point Park provides
                      direct pedestrian access to the river. A path which continues north from
                      the park passes Riverview Marina and the remains of Old Charlotte and
                      terminates at the Genesee Lighthouse, providing unique views of the land
                      and the river.

                      Additional scenic views and vistas of Lake Ontario and various ponds and
                      valleys exist in Durand-Eastman Park.        Scenic views and vistas of
                      Irondequoit Creek, Irondequoit Bay and the adjacent wetlands exist in
                      Tryon Park. Views from the river and the lake of existing development and
                      upland areas are also significant in many areas.

               10.    NATURAL RESOURCES

               A.     Overview

                      Rochester's    waterfront revitalization area contains a variety of
                      significant natural resources and environmental features. These include
                      fish and wildlife habitat areas, wetlands and unique topographic features   .
                      These areas are shown on MAP 11-7 on pages 11-39 through 11-41.

               B.     Fishery resources and habitats

                      The Genesee River flows north through the City of Rochester and is one of
                      four major New York State tributaries of Lake Ontario. The large size of
                      the Genesee, and the fact that much of the river corridor is essentially
                      undisturbed, make it one of the most important fish and wildlife habitats
                      in the Great Lakes Plain ecological region of New York State. However,
                      water pollution and extensive alteration of the lower channel have reduced
                      the environmental quality of the river.

                      The New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) has designated almost six
                      and one-half miles of the river as a mcoastal fish and wildlife habitat of
                      state-wide significance". (See the Appendix to the Inventory and Analysis
                      for a detailed description of the Genesee River habitat).       This habitat
                      area extends from the mouth of the river at Lake Ontario to the Lower
                      Falls, just south of the Driving Park Bridge.        The Lower Fal I s i s a
                      natural impassable barrier to fish.      The lower river area received a
                      rating of 54, which is well above the 15.5 threshold for designation as a
                      state coastal fish and wildlife habitat. The rating system was based on
                      five criteria:     ecosystem rarity; species vulnerability; human use;
                      population level of species present; and replacability.





                                                       11-38






                                                             ......    .....
                                                                                                                                       LOCAL VATERFRONT
                                                   .... ..       .......
                                                             ........... ::I:::**'.
                                                                       .......                                                         REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

                                                               ........................
                                                       ...... .....
                                                                       ............                                                    Rochester. Now York
                                                                                                         .. ....        ...            NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY
                                                                                       ......   ........     ........
                                                                                                       :..:t** .......                  Legend
                                                                                ............

                                                                                . ... ..............         *.: ..........
                                                                                  ...........          ..........   .....
                                                                                                       ..............
                                                                                      ..........                                                     PRIME AGRICULTURAL SOILS
                                                                                           ...........0 ..........        .....
                                                                                              ..........
                                                                                                             ............
                                                                                              .... ..................
                                                                                                           ........... ...
                                                                                                          ...........
                                                                                                                                                     FRESHWATER WETLANDS



                                                                                                                 . ..........                        S GNIFICANT FISH and
                                                                                                                                                     WILDLIFE HABITATS



                                                                                                                                                     BEACHES



                                                                                                                                                     UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHIC/
                                                                                                                                                     LZOGRAPHIC FEATURES



                                                                                                                                                     SCENIC VISTA


                                                                                                        \IJ










                                                         7












                                                                   ... ......





                                          or-






                                                              e,; or -
                                                                                                                                        Departrnent of Cormmx*y Developtnent
                                                                                                                                        Bure
                                                                                                                                               au of Planning and Zoning
                                                                                                                                      1,000, 0                      2,00(f"

                                                                                                                                         scale


                                                                                                                                                          il@@            #=..v glum    Va.
                                                                                                                                                                                           fta."





                                                                                                        MAP 11-7
                                                                                            LWRP NATURAL RESOURCES




                                                                                                              11-39






                                                                                                      Natural Resorces -invoiltary.




                                                                    L
                              d,                                         @j
                                                                    .. ......                                Match Lens A
                                                                                           3-5
                                                                                            XA




              L












                                                             St."







                                       ---------------




                                   21






                                  da. am                                                                                4"r-
                                         L



                              JL



                                                                                                                flu




                                                            rr 7.
                                        4-


                       ..jU



                                                                                                                1;77
                -Mai                     L


                                                                    .. 10
                                         L
                                                                                -U--j

                                       J
                                                                              2                 Department ot Community Development
                                                                      IL
                                                                                                Bureauof PlanningaAd Zoning
                                                                                            @!',,j 000, 0             2, 00(f
                        MAP 11-7
                                                                    L
                                                           ,j
























































            i'LWRP NATURAL       RESOURCES
                                                                    -A                          scale

                          11-40
                                                                                                "ftm@w ".Woo ..m                wt@ w X@ ft
                                                                                                '3M" ft=WM qg@. V=Wn" JMMAG &U
                                                                                                                            @C A%=9WWW
                                                                                                                    Wwwww an  a7z, .9
                                                                                                zraft 0@.






                                                                                                               Natural R           es Inventory


           I-E


                                                                                        041@-4'9/0

                                                  ................
                                        . . . .........        ...........
                                                . ...........


                                                      ............... ..


                                                 .. ............
                                                      . .............. ...         ..... .
                                                    . ............... ...

                                             ..................
                                               ............ ......... ...
                                                           . ... .... .....                         ... ...
                                    ......... . .......

                                  ...........                                                             FW
                                          ... ............. .....
                                                ..........
                                   ..... . ..... ......
                                                      ...........

                                                                                   ...                ........ ..
                                                    ............
                                                                        ......    ...... . .. ....



                                                                                                 . ..........






                                                                          A



                                      ljrl@l






                                                                                                    Department of Convmx*y Dwelopment
                                                                                                    Bureau of Planning and Zoning
                                                                                                 1,000, 0                  2, 000'
                        MAP   11-7
             LWRP NATURAL RESOURCES
                                                                                                    scale


                           11-41
                                                                                                                   -M4"               MUM 'd
                                                                                                                -- .--- JMWAN MW AUMWWW AW@atj-89@.
                                                         Ei









                       The Genesee River is a highly productive warmwater fisheries habitat which
                       supports concentrations of many resident and Lake Ontario based fish
                       species.  Among the more common resident species are smallmouth bass,
                       brown bullhead, northern pike, channel catfish, walleye, carp and white
                       sucker. Lake-run species found in the Genesee River include white bass,
                       yellow perch, white perch, smelt, bowfin, sheepshead, rock bass and
                       American eel.    These fish populations are supplemented by seasonal
                       influxes of large numbers of trout and salmon.         In the spring (late
                       February -April), steelhead (lake-run rainbow trout) and brown trout run
                       up the river, and lake trout occur at the river's mouth.             In fall
                       (September - November), concentrations of coho and chinook salmon, brown
                       trout and steelhead are found throughout the river during their spawning
                       runs.  The salmonid concentrations in the Genesee River are among the
                       largest occurring in Lake Ontario tributaries, and are largely the result
                       of an ongoing effort by NYSBEC to establish a major salmonid fishery in
                       the Great Lakes through stocking. In 1985, approximately 20,000 steelhead
                       and 300,000 chinook salmon were released in the river.

                       The Genesee River provides an important recreational fishery, attracting
                       anglers from throughout New York State and beyond.      Its location within
                       the City of Rochester results in very heavy fishing pressure from
                       residents of the metropolitan area. Major fishing areas along the river
                       include the river mouth at Lake Ontario, and the riverfront between Seth
                       Green Island and Lower Falls. Although the seasonal salmonid runs attract
                       the greatest number of fishermen to the area, the river also supports an
                       active warmwater fishery.     Easy access to the river for fishing is a
                       problem in many areas, however, due to the topography of the river gorge
                       Ponds within Durand-Eastman Park also receive heavy fishing use during th;
                       spring and summer months.      The fishing derbies held in the park are
                       important to many local residents.

                C.     Vildlife resources and habitats

                       Wildlife use of the river and shorezone is extremely limited and not well
                       documented. It appears to be limited to those species that can inhabit a
                       relatively narrow riparian corridor, and are somewhat tolerant of human
                       activities in adjacent areas. Possible or confirmed breeding bird species
                       include mallard, wood duck, red-tailed hawk, spotted sandpiper, belted
                       kingfisher, red-winged blackbird, swamp sparrow and various woodpeckers
                       and woodland passerine birds.       Other species occurring in the area
                       probably include beaver, deer, squirrel, skunk, raccoon, muskrat, northern
                       water snake and painted turtle. Due to the inaccessibility of the gorge,
                       there are no significant wildlife-related human uses of the river. The
                       steep slopes of the gorge and the wooded areas of Durand-Eastman Park
                       provide refuge for many types of wildlife.       The park is an invaluable
                       nature area that contains significant wetlands and a deer population of
                       between 200 and 300 animals.









                                                        11-42










                     Tidal and freshwater wetlands

                     Wetl ands are val uabl e f i sh and wi 1 dl i fe habi tats and serve as nesti ng and
                     breeding areas for many migratory species as well as spawning and nursery
                     areas for many species of fish.         Wetlands also provide flood and
                     stormwater retention capacity by slowing runoff and temporarily storing
                     water, thus protecting downstream areas from flooding. Aquifer recharge,
                     erosion control and recreational opportunities are other benefits of
                     wetland preservation.

                     In recognition of the benefits of wetlands, New York State enacted the
                     Freshwater Wetlands Act (Article 24 of the Environmental Conservation
                     Law).  Wetlands encompassing 12.4 acres or more are protected, as are
                     smaller areas having unusual local significance such as supporting a rare
                     or endangered species. Any filling or alteration of a wetland or within
                     a 100 foot buffer zone immediately surrounding the wetland requires a
                     permit from the NYSDEC.

                     Wetlands are classified into four categories.      Class I wetlands are the
                     most valuable and least disturbed, while Class IV wetlands are the least
                     valuable.   Permits for alteration of a wetland are more likely to be
                     granted for Class III and IV wetlands than those in the higher classes.
                     TABLE 11-3 on page 11-44 1 ists state-designated wetlands within the city's
                     LWRP, and the state classification category of each.

                     The U. S.   Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), a branch of the U.S.
                     Department of the Interior, has classified all significant wetlands in the
                     Rochester area, regardless of size. Maps showing wetland boundaries and
                     indicating the type of structural features and vegetation present were
                     completed using 1978 and 1981 aerial photography.        The USFWS classifi-
                     cation system categorizes wetlands first by the ecological system present.
                     In Rochester, this is usually riverine (in or adjacent to a river) or
                     palustrine (poorly drained or swampy area).         Some lacustrine (in or
                     adjacent to a lake) wetlands are found in and adjacent to Durand and
                     Eastman Lakes in Durand-Eastman Park.       Further classifications include
                     open water areas. emergents (vegetation which is rooted under the water
                     with parts of the plant extending up out of the water), shrub/scrub areas,
                     and forested areas. Common examples of emergent vegetation in Rochester
                     are cattails and purple loose strife.       Vegetation found in shrub/scrub
                     areas includes alder, buttonbush and dogwoods. In forested wetland areas
                     within Rochester, willows, red and silver maples and red ash are likely to
                     be found.

                     The USFWS areas identified generally occur in those areas shown on the
                     NYSDEC maps, with the exception of certain smaller and isolated wetlands
                     scattered throughout the city.       Federally designated wetlands impose
                     requirements upon federal agencies and federal ly-assisted projects, as
                     well as requiring permits through the USACE.







                                                      11-43












                                                      TABLE 11-3

                                     LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN
                       STATE DESIGNATED WETLANDS WITHIN THE LWRP (12.4 acres or greater)

                             State Code State Class Location

                             RH-6          II           River, NE, north of Rattlesnake Point

                             RH-8          11           River, NW, below Riverside Cemetery

                             RH-9          11           River. NE, Turning Point Park and northward

                             RH-20         I            River, NE, Seneca Park

                             RH-21         11           River, NE, Seneca Park and northward

                             RH712         I            Durand-Eastman Park

                             RH-13         I            Durand Lake, D-E Park

                             RH-14                      Eastman Lake, D-E Park

                             RH-15                      Durand-Eastman Park

                             RH-16                      Durand-Eastman Park

                             PH-1                       Tryon Park (small portion of Ellison Park
                                                        wetlands area)


                E.     Water quality

                       The Genesee River accumulates and transports a variety of pollutants to
                       Lake Ontario.    Water quality in the lower river has degraded over the
                       years because of the dumping of industrial wastes and untreated sewage
                       into the river. According to the Monroe County Health Department (MCHD),
                       the combination of combined sewer overflows, Eastman Kodak Company waste
                       discharges and connections with the Barge Canal have significantly
                       contributed to the pollution of the Genesee River.                   Because of
                       improvements to the city's sewer systems and the upgrading of Eastman
                       Kodak's King's Landing waste treatment plant which now removes silver and
                       other chemicals from plant waste water discharges, river water quality has
                       begun to improve.      Small amounts of cadmium used in the photographic
                       process still collect in river sediment, however, and can constitute a
                       health problem when the river is dredged causing these toxic metal
                       particles to become suspended in water.             The NYSDEC is currently
                       investigating elevated levels of toxic sediments in the lower Genesee and
                       the toxicity of Kodak discharges.




                                                         11-44








                   The Monroe County Pure Waters Agency (MCPWA) was formed in 1967 to
                   consolidate and improve municipal sanitary waste discharges.            The
                   Rochester Pure Waters District, one of five county sewer districts,
                   operates and maintains treatment facilities, interceptor sewers and a
                   collection system which serve the entire city.        A network of sewer
                   interceptors and new overflow tunnels collects sewage, stores it during
                   periods of high storm water runoff, then directs it to the Frank E.
                   VanLare Treatment Plant in Durand-Eastman Park for secondary treatment.
                   Five chlorination stations also serve the city.

                   Even though the upgraded city sewer system and improvements to industrial
                   wastewater treatment have greatly improved Genesee River water quality,
                   there are occasional periods of high storm water runoffs that cause
                   serious but temporary pollution problems in the river.            Pollution
                   resulting from combined sanitary and storm water sewers has been a
                   long-term problem for the Genesee River.      When stormwater runoff and
                   sanitary sewage is carried in the same system, a heavy rainfall will
                   generally produce flows which exceed treatment plant capacity. When this
                   happens, the excess flow of combined stormwater and sewage bypasses the
                   treatment plant and flows directly into the river. Rochester and Monroe
                   County are involved in the CSOAP project which has been designed to
                   correct this problem through the construction of large, underground
                   holding tunnels.

             F.    Air quality

                   At the current time, Rochester's air quality is not known to be a
                   significant problem and meets all national air quality standards.


             11.   FLOOD HAZARD AREAS


             A.    Waterflow

                   The greatest impact on waterflow in the river is created by a series of
                   dams. These include the Mount Morris Dam, the Court Street Dam and the
                   Middle Falls floodgates.   These dams regulate overall river levels and
                   flows in order to provide flood control for the region and to generate
                   electricity.   Streamflow in the lower Genesee fluctuates extensively
                   according to NYSDEC records. Mean annual flow is generally in the 3,000
                   to 3,500 cubic feet per second (cfs) range.     Mean annual maximum flows
                   generally fall in the 14,000 to 16,000 cfs range with mean minimum flows
                   in the 450 to 500 cfs range.

             B.    Flooding

                   As noted earlier, the Genesee River follows a well-defined channel through
                   much of its course through the City of Rochester.      Flooding along the
                   river was virtually eliminated with the construction of the Mt. Morris
                   Dam in 1952. The dam is located about 35 miles south of the city. The
                   only large area of the city which is below the 100 year flood elevation is
                   Genesee Valley Park, which is largely open space. Floodplain development
                   has been kept to a minimum in the city due to the steep topography of the


                                                  11-45








                     river gorge.     Areas of lower elevation near Lake Ontario have been
                     protected from flooding by filling, breakwalls and bulkheading.

                     The Federal Insurance Administration conducted a flood insurance study for
                     the City of Rochester in 1978. The study calculated the magnitude of wave
                     run-up during storm conditions in the city's waterfront revitalization
                     area at between 1.7 and 3 feet, using a method based on the Army Corps of
                     Engineers Shore Protection Manual.        This methodology considered wind
                     direction, wind speed, open water distance, near shore slope, and water
                     depth at representative shoreline cross-sections. Flood elevations which
                     include this wave run-up factor along Lake Ontario vary from about 252
                     feet mean sea level (msl) at Durand-Eastman Park, to 251 feet ms1 along
                     the shore north of Beach Avenue. Flood elevations in the lower Genesee
                     River corridor near the lake are    as low as 249 feet msl. The mean lake
                     level for October 1-15, 1986 was 246.09 feet, only 0.24 feet below the
                     maximum recorded level of 246.33 feet taken in October, 1945.

                     Considering the recent trend in Great Lakes levels, the flood levels
                     estimated by the Army Corps of Engineers may no longer be accurate.
                     Lakeshore damage in Rochester would be the most severe for the area west
                     of Clio Street and north of Beach Avenue.          These areas are already
                     suffering from erosion. Ontario Beach Park and Durand-Eastman Park may
                     also lose some beach area in the event of significant flooding which
                     occurs during times of peak lake levels.

               12.   KROSION HAZARD AREAS, SILTATION AND DREDGING

               A.    Coastal erosion hazard areas

                     A coastal erosion hazard area has been designated by the NYSDEC along the
                     shoreline of Lake Ontario, from the City of Rochester/Town of Greece
                     municipal boundary on the west, along the shoreline, to the City of
                     Rochester/Town of Irondequoit municipal boundary on the east, at the
                     eastern end of Durand-Eastman Park. This area is shown on maps prepared
                     by the NYSDEC entitled: Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map, City of Rochester
                     and dated August 29, 1988.     These maps are on file in the City Clerk's
                     Office at City Hall, and show the boundaries of- natural protective
                     features and structural hazard areas within the LWRP.

                     These maps i ndi cate that the shorel i ne area north of Beach Avenue from the
                     city / Town of Greece municipal boundary east to Welland Street is eroding
                     at a rate of approximately 1.5 feet per year. The shoreline area from
                     Welland Street east to Clematis Street is eroding at approximately 1.0
                     feet per year. The shoreline area contained within Ontario Beach Park has
                     been designated as a natural protective feature.          The shoreline area
                     within Durand-Eastman Park from the western park boundary to Sunset Point
                     Road has also been designated as a natural protective feature.              The
                     shoreline area that runs from Sunset Point Road east for approximately
                     1100 feet is eroding at approximately 1.0 feet per year. The remaining
                     portion of the Lake Ontario shoreline within the boundaries of the LWRP is
                     eroding at approximately 1.5 feet per year.




                                                       11-46









                     A natural protective feature is defined as a nearshore area, beach, bluff,
                     primary dune, secondary dune, or wetland, and the vegetation thereon. A
                     structural hazard area is defined as those shorelands, other than natural
                     protective features, subject to erosion and located landward of shorelines
                     having an average annual recession rate of 1 foot or more per year. The
                     inland boundary of a structural hazard area is calculated by starting at
                     the landward limit of a bluff and measuring along a line which is
                     perpendicular to the shoreline a horizontal distance which is 40 times the
                     long-term average annual recession rate.

              B.     Other erosion problems

                     A significant erosion problem does occur in the lower Genesee River, north
                     of the Stutson Street Bridge, near the river's outlet with Lake Ontario.
                     This problem involves wave surge action in the river caused by severe
                     northeastern storms.    This wave action causes damage to boats and boat
                     docks in the river, as well as the undermining of other structures and
                     facilities along the river bank.     Many marinas along the river north of
                     Stutson Street have suffered  damage to structures, boats and shoreline due
                     to the wave surge action of   major storms during the last several years.

                     Lower Genesee River levels    will be higher as a result of higher lake
                     levels, and the gorge may, therefore, suffer from increased shoreline
                     erosion.   Heavy motorized    boat activity in the river can accelerate
                     erosion of sensitive soils    found along the steeply sloped banks of the
                     gorge. Wetlands provide some protection from erosion for the riverbanks
                     in the lower gorge, however.

              C.     Siltation and dredging

                     Siltation, primarily caused by bank and sheet erosion, construction
                     activities and some farming practices, can have a significant effect on
                     water quality. Turbid water is visually unattractive. Silt also destroys
                     stream habitats by changing the natural water environment. Silt covers
                     and retains sewage wastes and other organic materials, which, through the
                     process of decomposition, depletes the supply of dissolved oxygen in the
                     water resulting in the killing of fish as well as water insect
                     populations. Silty water can also negatively impact fish spawning.

                     Bank erosion, a major factor in siltation, occurs partly because of
                     natural wave acti on and surf ace runof f as wel I as from the wash created by
                     powerboats on the river. A speed limit of 6 mph has been set by the Coast
                     Guard as a safety measure and as a means to protect riverbanks from
                     serious erosion. Enforcement of the speed limit is difficult, however.

                     Dredging activities in the port area designed to deepen the channel and to
                     clear marina slips of silt have also had a negative impact on water
                     quality. When dredging occurs, sediment is released and suspended in the
                     water. The larger, heavier particles soon resettle on the bottom while
                     the finer silts and clays remain suspended for longer periods of time and
                     are transported from the dredge site by local currents.          This causes
                     significant pollution problems within the river and is detrimental to the
                     natural fish and wildlife populations present there.


                                                      11-47









                       Both the NYSDEC and the Monroe County Heal th Department (MCHD) operate
                       water quality monitoring stations in Lake Ontario and the Genesee River.
                       NYSDEC's three surveillance stations are located near the Charlotte docks,
                       approximately two miles south of the Stutson Street Bridge at Boxart
                       Street, and on the east bank of the river between RG&EIs Station 5 power
                       plant and Driving Park Avenue. The MCHO maintains several stations in the
                       lake and along the river and has increased the frequency of data
                       collections since 1972.

                 13.   WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

                 Existing water and sewer lines and service within virtually all areas of the
                 city's LWRP are adequate and in relatively good condition.               There are no
                 developable areas that are not currently serviced for water and sewers. No major
                 problems have been identified with this element of the public infrastructure.
                 Therefore, adequate water and sewer service within the LWRP is not currently a
                 hinderance to development.


                 14.   TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

                 The transportation network within the city's     LWRP boundary involves an extensive
                 system of existing streets, and roads and highways that are operated and
                 maintained by the city, county and New York State. Major and minor arterials and
                 principal collector streets within the LWRP include Lake Avenue, St.                 Paul
                 Street, Ridge Road West, the Lake Ontario State Parkway (LOSP), Beach Avenue,
                 Stutson Street, Lakeshore Boulevard and Driving Park Avenue.             Virtually all
                 developed areas within the LWRP boundary are also serviced by public
                 transportation through the Roches ter/Genes ee Regional Transit Authority (R/GRTA).

                 The four current major transportation network issues within the city's LWRP are
                 the condition and capacity of Lake Avenue, general traffic congestion in the
                 vicinity of Ontario Beach Park during periods of peak summer use, the condition
                 of and operating problems associated with the Stutson Street Bridge, and
                 potential linkages with the New York State Seaway Trail..

                 From Ridge Road West north to the LOSP, Lake Avenue is part of the State
                 legislated arterial system. The section north of the parkway is on the Federal
                 Aid Urban System (FAUS). Lake Avenue is a major north/south arterial which runs
                 parallel to the west bank of the Genesee River. Lake Avenue provides access to
                 downtown Rochester, Kodak Park, the West Ridge Road area, several residential
                 areas, including the Maplewood and Charlotte neighborhoods, -'several strip
                 commercial areas, the parkway, Ontario Beach Park and the Port of Rochester site.
                 The northern terminus of Lake Avenue is Beach Avenue, near Ontario Beach Park.

                 A study entitled Project Initiation Request: Lake Avenue which was completed by
                 Bergmann Associates, P.C. in 1987, identified several problems associated with
                 Lake Avenue. These included a deteriorated roadway base in several areas, narrow
                 travel lanes resulting in reduced capacities and increased accidents, inadequate
                 curb reveal and stopping sight distances, lack of left-turn storage lanes at many
                 intersections, confusing intersection geometrics, poor levels of service and
                 excessive delays at some intersections, lack of accommodations for bicycles, and
                 lack of adequate pedestrian faci-lities.          The study recommended a combined


                                                           11-48









              reconstruction and rehabilitation project for Lake Avenue which would include
              geometric improvements at several intersections, a variety of surface and
              sub-surface structural improvements, and provision of new pedestrian and bicycle
              facilities in several areas.

              Traffic congestion in the vicinity of Ontario Beach Park is a problem during
              periods of peak park use during the summer as well as during special events or
              festivals held at the park. Traffic volumes on Lake Avenue fluctuate between
              14,000 and 20,000 vehicles per day according to the Monroe County Department of
              Traffic Engineering. The Lake Avenue / Stutson Street and Lake Avenue / Beach
              Avenue intersections operate at level of service F on summer weekends. This
              indicates significant delays and limited traffic movement during these periods.

              Monroe County is investigating the engineering feasibility of replacing or
              rehabilitating the existing Stutson Street Bridge. The bridge was designed in
              1913-14 for the City of Rochester, and construction was completed in 1917. The
              city retained ownership and operation of the bridge until 1968 when these
              responsibilities were transferred to Monroe County.

              The bridge is currently in a deteriorating condition. Replacement parts for the
              machinery which raises and lowers the bridge must now be custom made. Bridge
              openings during the summer months to accommodate boat traffic on the Genesee
              River cause traffic congestion and back-ups at the Lake Avenue / Stutson Street
              intersection. Queues for traffic turning left and heading eastbound onto Stutson
              Street from Lake Avenue can back up to Holy Cross Church when the bridge is open
              during summer weekend afternoons. Construction of a new bridge which would be
              relocated to the south of the existing location and which would line up with the
              parkway would help to alleviate much of the traffic congestion and convoluted
              traffic circulation patterns that exist at the Lake Avenue / Stutson Street
              intersection. Development of the design, engineering and construction details
              for any proposed Stutson Street Bridge replacement project should be done in
              close cooperation between the city, the Town of Irondequoit, Monroe County and
              the State of New York.

              An integral part of the New York State Seaway Trail is located within the city's
              LWRP boundary. This section of the trail includes the LOSP, Stutson Street and
              Lakeshore Boulevard.   The Seaway Trail is a mixed-use, shared right-of-way
              recreation corridor which runs for approximately 474 miles from the New York/
              Pennsylvania border to Massena, New York. The Seaway Trail has been designated
              a National Recreation Trail and will be the initial element of a proposed Great
              Lakes trail system to run from Grand Portage, Minnesota to the New England
              seaboard. There is a potential to develop loops or linkages to existing and
              proposed recreation/tourism facilities in the city from the Seaway Trail via
              informational signage, brochures and marketing. Areas that could be included in
              this expanded trail system include the Genesee River gorge, Ontario Beach Park,
              Turning Point Park, Seneca Park and Maplewood Park.









                                                    11-49











               15.    OTHER ISSUES

               A.     Hazardous waste sites and storage of toxic materials

                      The NYSDEC maintains a list of inactive hazardous waste disposal sites
                      known as the NYS Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites.
                      State funds for cleanup of these sites are currently provided by tFe
                      Environmental Quality Bond Act (EQBA) of 1986, which provided $1.2 billion
                      for remediation of inactive hazardous waste sites. Three of the twelve
                      sites on the NYS Registry for Rochester are located within the LWRP
                      boundary.  These sites are summarized in Table 11-4 on Page 11-51 from
                      data taken from the City of Rochester State of the Environment Report
                      (1988).

                      Generators of hazardous wastes, or those companies, institutions, govern-
                      ment agencies, and other facilities which produce hazardous wastes in
                      their operations, are required to obtain permits and report regularly to
                      the NYSDEC and USEPA on their activities under State and federal law. The
                      City of Rochester has 65 permitted hazardous waste generators, producing
                      approximately 26,331 tons of wastes annually.      The top ten generators
                      produce close to 97% of all hazardous wastes generated in Rochester. The
                      largest generator is Eastman Kodak Company which produces about 21,737
                      tons annually from seven locations in Rochester, or about 83% of the
                      regulated hazardous waste in the city.

                      Seven industries operate treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
                      (TSDF's or TSD's) for their own hazardous wastes. There are no commercial
                      TSD's located in Rochester.       The Eastman Kodak Company operates a
                      hazardous waste incinerator at Kodak Park. The remaining TSD's are used
                      for temporary storage of material prior to disposal outside of the county,
                      either in the Buffalo area or out of state.

                      Pursuant to the Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites Act of 1979
                      (Article 27, Title 13 of the New York State Environmental Conservation
                      Law), Monroe County has responsibility for the identification of suspected
                      inactive waste disposal sites. Sites which are suspected of containing
                      hazardous waste are referred to the NYSDEC for further investigation.

                      The county has developed draft maps of all suspected and confirmed
                      dumpsites in Rochester using aerial photography, public agency files, and
                      information provided by the general public.        Over 90 dumpsites were
                      identified within the city. The county has also compiled site activity
                      records which are keyed to these maps.

                      It should also be noted that at present, no program for proper disposal of
                      household hazardous waste such as insecticides, used automobile oil and
                      paint remover exists at the city, county, or state levels of government.








                                                      11-50












                                                   TABLE 11-4

                                   LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN
                        HYS REGISTRY INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES WITHIN THE LVRP

              Site/(State Id.#)         Classification      Summary

              1. Old Rochester City                 2a      Active period: 1930's -1970. Approx
                   Landfill                                 size: 20 acres. Former city landfill:
                   (Pattonwood Drive)                       Soil contaminated with hydrocarbons.
                   (8-28-009)                               Scheduled for Phase 11 investigation
                                                            in 1990.

              2. Genesee River Gorge                2       Active period: 1800-1970's. Site
                   (8-28-044)                               generally located between Upper and
                                                            Lower Falls, including former Deep
                                                            Hollow Ravine.      Coal gasification
                                                            wastes suspected of being disposed of
                                                            in gorge.    Chemical seeps leaching
                                                            out of face of Lower Falls, similar
                                                            in nature to material encountered
                                                            during Cliff Street siphon tunnel
                                                            construction    (Feb.- March      1985).
                                                            Xylene, toluene, benzene, creosote
                                                            products found.     Expanded Phase I
                                                            report completed in 1988.       DEC is
                                                            negotiating with the potentially
                                                            responsible parties (PRP) to conduct
                                                            the RI/FS.      City and RG&E have
                                                            proposed work program to DEC.

              3. Eastman Kodak Co.                 2        Active period: 1953-present.
                   Kodak Park East,                         Approx. size: 60 acres. Groundwater
                   (8-28-071)                               contaminated with methylene chloride
                                                            and other solvents.     As an interim
                                                            remedial action, a few recovery wells
                                                            are    removing     groundwater      and
                                                            discharging it to Kodak's King's
                                                            Landing Waste Water Treatment Plant.














                                                       11-51









                      B.        Sum" of local laws and regulations

                      Local laws and regulations which were enacted as a result of the LWRP are
                      contained in the Appendices to the LWRP. Local laws and regulations which are
                      relevant to the City's LWRP are summarized in TABLE 11-5 below.                                    Zoning within
                      the northern portion of the LWRP boundary is shown on MAP V-7 on page V-71.

                                                                         TABLE 11-5

                                                    LOCAL VATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN
                                                           RELEVANT LAWS AND REGULATIONS



                      ZONING    DISTRICT    OR    OTHER                                                     SLINMARY OF
                      REGULATIONS                               PRIMARY LWRP AREAS                          REGULATIONS

                      *River-Harbor (R-H)                       * Port Authority Site                       *Permits        water-retated
                         District                               *  East and west river                      recreation     and     commercial
                                                                    banks from Lake to                      development; Minimum waterfront
                                                                    Denise Road Area                        setbacks are  required. Special
                                                                *  Summerville area                         permit required for uses within
                                                                   Portions of the                          100 feet of river.
                                                                    River street Site

                         Open Space (OS)                           Public parkland                          *Restricts     development      to
                         District                                  Genesee River Gorge                      parks, cemeteries, and outdoor
                                                                   Riverside Cemetery                       recreation faciLities. Special
                                                                                                            permit required for many uses.
                         Site plan review                          ALL LWRP areas                           *Requires review of site plan
                      procedures                                                                            designs    for   virtually     all
                                                                                                            development or rehabilitation
                                                                                                            in city. Includes criteria for
                                                                                                            review of plans.
                         Environmental Review                      Ali LWRP areas                           *Requires    detailed     environ-
                         Procedures                                                                         mental review for aLL Type I
                                                                                                            and Unlisted Actions.       Review
                                                                                                            requires    identification      of
                                                                                                            proposed mitigating measures.
                                                                                                            Type I actions include develop-
                                                                                                            ment in sensitive environmental
                                                                                                            areas in shorezone.


                      16.       DEVELOPNEW OPPORTWITIES AND CONSTRAINTS

                      A.        Overview

                                Steep slopes, potential erosion problems and inaccessibility make any
                                significant development in the river gorge itself unfeasible.                                         Sl ope
                                problems are most severe in the area from Turning Point Park south to the
                                Upper Falls.          At the park, the waterfront revitalization area broadens
                                into a series of three plateaus stepping down to the river.                                        At this
                                point, however, the presence of wetlands along the river's edge prevents
                                direct access to the water and serves as a major constraint to
                                development.








                                                                              11-52









                    Few existing areas or land uses within the city's waterfront area are
                    derel i ct, underutilized or abandoned.        There are, however,       five
                    significant development sites within the   LWRP boundary. These areas are
                    discussed below and are show on MAP 11-8 on pages 11-54 through 11-56
                    along with major land owners within the LWRP.

                    An area to the north of Seneca Park, along the east bank of the river, is
                    characterized by steep, wooded slopes and contains significant wetlands.
                    This area is virtually undevelopable and should be designated as permanent
                    open space or public parkland.      The remaining four development areas
                    within the LWRP boundary have significant development potential.

             B.     General description of development parcels within the LVRP

                    The four development areas within the LWRP boundary include:

                    (1)   A parcel near St. Bernard's Seminary (22 acres).      Currently, this
                          parcel is part of Eastman Kodak's Park facilities and is zoned M-
                          IPD. Kodak is developing this parcel as a research/office facility.

                    (2)   Boxart Street/Burley Road area (18 acres).      Although this area is
                          located within the waterfront revitalization area, it is an upland
                          area and is not visible from the river.          The parcel i s zoned
                          residential and has been developed for single-family housing on 12.6
                          acres. The remaining acreage has been retained as open space.
                    (3)   The River Street area (5 1/2 acres).         This area includes the
                          abandoned Conrail switching yards on the west bank of the river,
                          near the historic Genesee Lighthouse.        This area includes two
                          parcels: one is owned by the City of Rochester and the other is
                          owned by New York State.

                    (4)   The port site (22 acres).      This area once housed a large blast
                          furnace and later supported commercial shipping operations.         The
                          site is now vacant, except for a large parking area for Ontario
                          Beach Park, two warehouses along the river's edge, and a 4-ramp boat
                          launch owned and operated by Monroe County.

                          None of the parcels listed above have significant infrastructure
                          problems. Water and sewer lines and public streets existed or have
                          been constructed as part of approved development.              At the
                          Boxart-Burley site, main sewer connections existed. Water and sewer
                          lines were installed in the area as part of the subdivision
                          development.

              C.    The Port Site

                    The port site presents a unique set of development opportunities and
                    constraints.   At one time, a significant part of the site was wetland.
                    This portion of the site, now filled in, has limited bearing capacity
                    which restricts the height of buildings which can be built on the site.
                    This is particularly true in the portion of the site near the river. The
                    port site is shown on Map 11-9 on page 11-57.


                                                     11-53






                                                                                            LOCAL VUTERFRONT
                                                                                            REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                                                            Rochester, Now york

                                                                                            MAJOR LAND OWNERS
                                                                                            Legend



                                                                                                        CITY of ROCHESTER



                                                                                                        MONME COUNTY



                                                                                                        NEW YORK STATE



                                                                                                        U.S.A.



                                                                                                        PRIVATELY OWNED MARINAS



                                                                                                        PRIVATELY OWNED LAND


                                                                            CIS
             4@                                                                                         EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

                                                                                                        ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC
                                                                                L


                                                                                                        HOLY SEPULCHRE CEMETERY



                                                                                                        CONRAIL



                            Mar-










                    ..... . . . . . . . . . .






               imp-
                            _J



                                                                                             Department of Cormmwdty Developnent
                                                         MatCh Un"
                                                                                             Bureau of Planning and Zoning
                                                                                           1  00(f 0                2, 00(f
                                                        MAP 11-8
                                     MAJOR LAND OWNERS WITHIN              THE   LWRP        scale

                                                           11-54                                     from" fte -m qw. vam ftme  a vmo am="
                                                                                                    -_ ____ ----         t@ --m cwt@ -A Am= sm
                                                                                                  ta"@ 8FAW"ml- Mom" ow- we hummmba Am"awaAm.
                                                                                             o@@ o- tm Q@ &.- wAmmm @ t     Ws. a mw=IL raft,"
                                              Aw







                                                                         4 L.
                                                                                                                                           UmW Lad Ownwe






                                                                                                                                  Match Lone A

























                                                L- - - - - - - - - - - - - -




                         J.

                                                                                   fill
                                          A
                                                                                  -,I
             OOV

                                                                                                          ,@el
                                          _-l Lr
                                                                                                                   %AAL_ t

                                   JL
                                                                                                                           -3r       =71
                                                                                                                                             Lj
              it
                                                                                                                                                        .771.



                                                                                                                     :4-7



                                                             ,row=
                                                                                                                                                                         MAW



                                                                                                     -
                                                                                                     A
                                                                                                          . -:. I

                                                                                AV
                                          F
                                              J-1
                                                 I        !F@_                          ",-:
                                                      F
                                                                                                                  Depwtnwd of C4mfflx*Y Deveiopment
                                                                                                                  Burgau of Planning and Zoning

                                         IF-
                                                                                                    it      :11r.1, 00(@ o
                                                                                                                                             2,00
                                     MAP    11-8
               MAJOR      LAND    OWNERS WITHIN            THE    LWRP%                                            scale


                                                                                                                               ."go ftmwwml@ mmm&@         gum 29 1@ wd

                                                                         -UL-A
                                               55                                                                                                an at kin. is 4mfts. ftow"







                                                                                        Major Land Owners







                                                                   ".4,9/C)













                                                                              Ak-@


                              Al




                                                                        Iff








                                                                             rnent of Camwnity Druel"nient
                                                                       Depart
                                                                                 Planning and Zoning
                                                                          reau
                                                                     1, 00e 0           2,000,
                        MAP 11-8                          1            Fmm=ffmmm=mmmmR
          MAJOR LAND  OWNERS WITHIN   THE LWRP                         scale


                                                                         "0 a mmm" 9W Im -00 @ am am@ 61 Ram C@"
                                                                            ,.__ ---  @ ft@ -
                          11-56                                        F-mme @mw     @am a Lora. a
                                                                       Aran lft@.






                                                                                                                     LOCAL MTERFRONT
                                                                                                                     REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                                                                                     Rochester, Now York

                                                                                                                     DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS
                                                                                                                     Legend


                                                                 A                                                                  FLOOD PLAIN



                                                                                                                                    STEEP SLOPES



                                                                                                                                    AREAS OF CRITICAL EROSION
                                                                       @' ax


                                                                                                                                    HIGH WATER TABLE/
                                                                                                                                    SHALLOW SOILS



                                                                                                                                    WATER QUALITY


                                                                                                                                         Classification


                                                                                                                                         Limiting Segmnts


                                                                                                                                    HISTORIC/ARCHEOLJOGICAL SITE



                                                                                                                                    SERVICE AMA

                                                                                                                                         Public Water SupPlY
                                   j

                                                                                                                                         Public Sewer


                                                                                   4,                                               EXCLUDED FEDERAL LANDS
                                              17
                                                                                                                       WK



                                                                                                                                    PORT OF ROCHEST"En



                                                                                                                                    RIVER STREET AREA









                                                                                                                       Depa
                                                                                                                               rtment of Conminity Develo
                                                                                    -Wne A                             Buresi of Planning and Zoning
                                                                          MAP    11-9                                1,000, 0                      2, 00(f
                                                     THE     PORT AND RIVER STREET SITES                                scale


                                                                                                                                         I      @aZaFM fr= U& Off L= 24 'X&W MMA
                                                                                                                                       P'@' @@ ..a        ft ftftw-w
                                                                                                                                     ca.@L t@ lvffAw@ ::t 3C '1271. o And. ftdoc"
                                                                              11-57









                     The port site's most obvious and overwhelming physical feature is its
                     proximity to the water.    The river and lake, boating activity, the
                     adjacent beach and the water-related activities in and around the port
                     area are positive site features and help to enhance its visual and
                     aesthetic qualities. Other positive site features include the bathhouse
                     and Dentzel carousel at nearby Ontario Beach Park, the Genesee River pier
                     and the Port Authority Warehouse. Each of these buildings contribute to
                     the port's unique waterfront and recreational atmosphere.

                     Interesting views and vistas are encountered at the Genesee Lighthouse on
                     the westside of the river as well as at the U.S. Coast Guard Station on
                     the east side of the river. Both buildings are picturesque and contribute
                     to the scenic quality of the site. Unfortunately, pedestrian access to
                     the Lighthouse is difficult from the port site, due to physical barriers
                     including the Conrail tracks an the north and the sloping terrain to the
                     south and east.  Access to the Coast Guard Station is limited from the
                     east bank because of security considerations.

                     Site design constraints include the physical appearance and placement of
                     the picnic shelters in nearby Ontario Beach Park. They block views and
                     create a sense of congestion within the park. The unusual design of the
                     community bandstand located in the park accentuates its location and
                     appearance and also detracts from views of the lake and river.

                     A major problem with the port site is the lack of focus or sense of
                     arrival as one approaches from the south or west. Initial views from the
                     Lake Avenue Conrail Bridge are disappointing and somewhat obscured by
                     existing development.     Lake Avenue is also quite wide and lacks
                     appropriate streetscape amenities such as street trees, landscaping,
                     benches, etc. The port site itself is largely vacant with river views
                     blocked by two warehouses at the eastern edge of the site.

                     While the popularity of Ontario Beach Park creates many development
                     opportunities, it also causes major parking and traffic problems in the
                     area during periods of peak utilization. During the summer months, the
                     Lake Avenue/Beach Avenue intersection becomes very congested because of
                     the many pedestrian/vehicular conflicts occurring in the area.

                     Another development constraint in the port area is the mix of commercial
                     and residential uses along Lake Avenue.     Because of its lack of major
                     year-round uses, the area has a somewhat seasonal character. There are,
                     however, some existing year-round restaurants.      Some of the seasonal
                     facilities are unattractive and show evidence of very little investment.
                     This is typical of seasonal facilities suffering from inadequate revenues.

                     Of the two warehouses on the port site, only the northern-most structure
                     could be considered for significant development.    This building has an
                     interesting character, and its eastern facade and veranda can be opened up
                     to allow panoramic views of the river. The building could be reused for
                     a variety of water-related activities including a unique riverfront
                     restaurant, hotel or boatel.




                                                    11-58









                      The other warehouse has little redevelopment potential and blocks access
                      and views of the river. The four-ramp boat launch constructed by the
                      county at the southern end of the.port site provides access to the river
                      for fishermen and pleasure boaters but creates additional demand for
                      on-site car and trailer parking. The amount of land area required for
                      this parking limits other potential development on the site.            The boat
                      launch also contributes to the intense seasonal flavor and atmosphere of
                      the port site.

                      The port site must be considered as a single unified area in order to
                      realize its full development potential. The land immediately adjacent to
                      the water is extremely valuable and offers considerable potential for many
                      types of development. The Lake Avenue frontage also has a significant
                      devel opment potenti al .   However, without the development of a strong
                      relationship between the port site and the water, this area has very
                      little to distinguish it from any other large vacant parcel of land in the
                      City of Rochester. The port site has unique physical characteristics and
                      aesthetic qualities that must be considered, enhanced and carefully woven
                      into any development scheme.        An overall design relationship between
                      existing and proposed uses and structures must be established on the site,
                      that will take advantage of the waterfront location and the opportunities
                      for development of unique water-related activities.

               D.     The River Street area

                      The River Street area, located to the south of the port site and
                      immediately adjacent to the Genesee River, has a unique neighborhood
                      character that results from its topography, and relative seclusion, its
                      architecture, and the small bars, restaurants and other commercial uses
                      that are found there. The River Street site is shown on MAP 11-9 on page
                      11-57.

                      Views of the river and port area from the bluff and the Genesee Lighthouse
                      are exceptional. The lighthouse is a tremendous asset to the area due to
                      its historic significance and unique architecture.               Similarly, the
                      abandoned railroad station, located between River Street        and the Genesee
                      River, is an interesting building with good reuse potential. Some of the
                      older buildings in the area are also architecturally significant and offer
                      unique opportunities for adaptive reuse. Many of the adjacent commercial
                      uses on Lake Avenue near Latta Road provide services to neighborhood
                      residents. These uses are a valuable asset for potential new residential
                      development. Some of these area businesses offer products and services
                      for fishermen, boaters and tourists.

                      Despite these positive features, the River Street area has several
                      development constraints. The RUE substation is unattractive and detracts
                      from views from the lighthouse grounds. The sewage lift station on River
                      Street is another unattractive feature that could constrain future
                      development. Finally, the east-west rail line which crosses the river at
                      the swing bridge physically separates this area from the port site, while
                      the north-south rail line limits development, particularly in the area
                      north of the Tapecon manufacturing facility. Although occasional trains
                      using these tracks could be a positive site feature by contributing to the


                                                         11-59









                     unique ambience of the area, the railroad right-of-way still restricts
                     access and movement and hinders full development in this area.

                     Access to the River Street area is somewhat difficult due to street
                     widths, grade and direction.     River Street is currently one-way, going
                     north from Stutson Street.      Access to the lighthouse is particularly
                     confusing and it is not easily seen from Lake Avenue. In addition, the
                     River Street area has very little land available for parking.         All of
                     these factors serve to constrain development in the area.

                     River Street is a dead-end street and contains few uses which generate
                     people. The street is too narrow and confined to successfully accommodate
                     many types of new uses and the pedestrian and vehicular traffic they would
                     generate. At the same time, the area has virtually no residential uses.
                     These factors contribute to a uno man's landu quality which constrains
                     many types of future public and private development.

                     The area along the river to the south of River Street (the former Conrail
                     land from Stutson Street to Petten Street) is narrow and has limited
                     access.   Near Petten Street, where the property widens, there is more
                     development potential, particularly for water-dependent uses. These uses
                     could include a boat-launching ramp with car-trailer parking, boat slips,
                     a dry-stack storage facility for boats, or a pedestrian footpath that
                     connects the area with the River Street area to the north.



































                                                      11-60






  0

























                                         INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS

                                                APPENDIX

                         . GENESEE RIVER COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT























  0


                                                  11-61









                                COASTAL FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT RATING FORM



              Name of Area: Genesee River

              Designated: October 15, 1987

              County: Monroe

              Town(s): Rochester

              7%' Quadrangle(s): Rochester East, NY; Rochester West, NY


              Score     Criterion

               20       Ecosystem Rarity (ER)
                        One of 4 major New York tributaries of Lake Ontario; unusual in the
                        Great Lakes Plain ecological region, but rarity is reduced by human
                        disturbances. Geometric mean: (16 x 25))'


                0       Species Vulnerability (SV)
                        Spotted salamander (SC) and spotted turtle (SC) have been observed but
                        the extent of use not well documented.




                16      Human Use (HU)
                        A major recreational fishing area on Lake Ontario, attracting anglers
                        from throughout New York State and beyond.       Locally important for
                        birdwatching and informal nature study.


                 9      Population Level (PL)
                        Concentrations of spawning slamonids are among the largest occuring in
                        New York's Great Lakes tributaries; unusual in the ecological region.



                1.2     Replaceability (R)
                        Irreplaceable







               SIGNIFICANCE VALUE    1( ER + SV + HU + PL ) X RI

                                     54







                                                        11-62









               DESIGNATED HABITAT: GENESSEE RIVER

               LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT:

               The Genesee River is a major tributary of Lake Ontario, located in the City of
               Rochester, Monroe County (7.5' Quadrangles: Rochester West, N.Y.; and Rochester
               East, N.Y.). The fish and wildlife habitat is an approximate six and one-half
               mile segment of the river, extending from Lake Ontario to "Lower Falls" (located
               just above Driving Park Avenue), which is a natural impassable barrier to fish.
               The Genesee River is a large, warmwater river, with a drainage area of nearly
               2,500 square miles, and an average annual discharge of approximately 2,800 cubic
               feet per second. Maximum water depths of up to 25 feet occur near the river
               mouth, and a navigation channel has been dredged upstream approximately two and
               one-half miles.  Much of this lower segment is bordered by dense commercial,
               industrial, and residential development, accompanied by extensive bulkheading.
               Above this area, the Genesee River flows through a relatively undeveloped wooded
               gorge, and has a fringe of emergent wetland vegetation along much of its
               shoreline. This portion of the river is relatively shallow, with a rocky bottom.
               The only significant development within the gorge is an industrial wastewater
               treatment facility. However, the river has been subject to considerable water
               pollution problems, including discharges of sewage and chemical contaminants.
               Above Lower Falls, the Genesee River has been dammed for hydroelectric power
               development, resulting in some alteration of river flows downstream.

               FISH AND WILDLIFE VALUES:

               The Genesee River is one of 4 major New York tributaries of Lake Ontario. The
               large size of this river, and the fact that much of the river corridor is
               essentially undisturbed, makes this one of the most important potential fish and
               wildlife habitats in the Great Lakes Plain ecological region of New York State.
               However. water pollution, and extensive alteration of the lower river channel,
               have reduced the environmental quality of this area.
               The Genesee River is a highly productive warmwater fisheries habitat, supporting
               concentrations of many resident and Lake Ontario based fish species. Among the
               more common resident species are smallmouth bass, brown bullhead, northern pike,
               channel catfish, walleye, carp, and white sucker. Lake-run species found in the
               Genesee River include white bass, yellow perch, white perch, smelt, bowfin,
               sheepshead, rock bass, and American eel . These fish populations are supplemented
               by seasonal influxes of large numbers of trout and salmon.   In the spring (late
               February - April), steelhead (lake-run rainbow trout) run up the river, and lake
               trout occur at the mouth.       In fall (September - November.        primarily),
               concentrations of coho and chinook salmon, brown trout, and steelhead, are found
               throughout the river during their spawning runs. The salmonid concentrations in
               the Genesee River are among the largest occurring in tributaries of Lake Ontario,
               and are largely the result of an ongoing effort by the NYSDEC to establish a
               major salmonid fishery in the Great Lakes through stocking.             In 1985
               approximately 20,000 steelhead and 300,000 chinook salmon were released in th;
               river. The Genesee River provides an important recreational fishery, attracting
               anglers from throughout New York State and beyond. Its location within the city
               results in very heavy fishing pressure from residents of the Rochester
               metropolitan area, concentrated primarily at the river mouth, and between Seth
               Green Island and Lower Falls. Although the seasonal salmonid runs attract the
               greatest number of fishermen to the area, the river also supports an active
               warmwater fishery.


                                                       11-63








                 Wildlife use of the Genesee River is not well documented, but appears to be
                 limited to those species that can inhabit a relatively narrow riparian corridor
                 and are somewhat tolerant of human activities in adjacent areas.            Possible o@
                 confirmed breeding bird species include mallard, wood duck, great horned owl,
                 red-tailed hawk, spotted sandpiper, belted kingfisher, red-winged blackbird
                 swamp sparrow, and various woodpeckers and woodland passerine birds.             Severai
                 beaver colonies inhabit the lower Genesee in the vicinity of Turning Point Park
                 and Rattlesnake Point. Spotted salamander (SC) and spotted turtle (SC) have been
                 observed in the Lower Genesee River Gorge but the extent of use by these species
                 is not well documented. Other wildlife species occurring in the area probably
                 include raccoon, muskrat, northern water snake, and painted turtle. The wildlife
                 resources of the Genessee River and its adjacent woodlands are locally important
                 for birdwatching, and informal nature study.

                 IMPACT ASSESSMENT:

                 A habitat impairment test must be met for any activity that is subject to
                 consistency review under federal and State laws, or under applicable local laws
                 contained in an approved local waterfront revitalization program.                If the
                 proposed action is subject to consistency review, then the habitat protection
                 policy applies, whether the proposed action is to occur within or outside the
                 designated area.

                 The specific habitat impairment test that must be met is as follows.

                       In order to protect and preserve a significant habitat, land and
                       water uses or development shall not be undertaken if such actions
                       would:

                       0 destroy the habitat; or,

                       0 significantly impair the viability of a habitat.


                 Habitat destruction is defined as the loss of fish or wildlife use through direct
                 physical alteration, disturbance, or pollution of a designated area or through
                 the indirect effects of these actions on a designated area. Habitat destruction
                 may be indicated by changes in vegetation, substrate, or hydrology, or increases
                 in runoff, erosion. sedimentation, or pollutants.
                 Significant impairment is defined as reduction in vital resources (e.g., food,
                 shelter, living space) or change in environmental conditions (e.g., temperature.
                 substrate, salinity) beyond the tolerance range of an organism.- Indicators of
                 a significantly impaired habitat focus on ecological alterations and may include
                 but are not limited to reduced carrying capacity. changes in community structure
                 (food chain relationships, species diversity), reduced productivity and/or
                 increased incidence of disease and mortality.
                 The tolerance range of an organism is not defined as the physiological range of
                 confi ti ons beyond whi ch a sped es wi'l 1 not survi ve at al 1 , but as the ecol ogi cal
                 range of conditions that supports the species population or has the potential to
                 support a restored population, where practical . Either the loss of individuals
                 through an increase in emigration or an increase in death rate indicates that the
                 tolerance range of an organism has been exceeded. An abrupt increase in death
                 rate may occur as an envi ronmental f actor f al 1 s beyond a tol erance I imi t (a range


                                                               11-64








                has both upper and lower limits). Many environmental factors, however, do not
                have a sharply defined tolerance limit, but produce increasing emigration or
                death rates with increasing departure from conditions that are optimal for the
                species.

                The range of parameters which should be considered in appplying the habitat
                impairment test include but are not limited to the following:

                1.   physical parameters such as Iiving space, circulation, flushing rates,
                     tidal amplitude, turbidity, water temperature, depth (including loss of
                     littoral zone), morphology, substrate type, vegetation. structure, erosion
                     and sedimentation rates;
                2.      biological parameters such as community structure, food chain
                     relationships, species diversity, predator/prey relationships, population
                     size, mortality rates, reproductive rates, meristic features, behavioral
                     patterns and migratory patterns; and,
                3.   chemical parameters such as dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide, acidity,
                     dissolved solids, nutrients, organics, salinity, and pollutants (heavy
                     metals, toxics and hazardous materials).

                Although not comprehensive, examples of generic activities and impacts which
                could destroy or significantly impair the habitat are listed below to assist in
                applying the habitat impairment test to a proposed activity.

                Any activity that substantially degrades water quality, increases temperature or
                turbidity, reduces flows, or increases water level fluctuations in the Genesee
                River, would affect the biological productivity of this area. Important species
                of fish and wildlife would be adversely affected by water pollution, such as
                chemical contamination (including food chain effects), oil spills, excessive
                turbidity, and waste disposal. Continued efforts should be made to improve water
                quality in the river, which is primarily dependent upon controlling discharges
                from combined sewer overflows, industrial point sources, ships, and agricultural
                lands in the watershed.

                The existing navigation channel should be dredged between mid-May and mid-August
                or between mid-November and early April in order to avoid impacts on the habitat
                use by migrating salmonids. Activi-ties that would affect the habitat abobe the
                navigation channel should not be conducted during the period from March through
                July in order to protect warmwater fish habitat values. New dredging (outside
                the existing navigation channel) would likely result in the direct removal of
                warmwater fish habitat values and should not be permitted. Contaminated dredge
                spoils should be deposited in upland containment areas.

                Barriers to fish migration, whether physical or chemical, would have significant
                effects on fish populations within the river, and in adjacent Lake Ontario
                waters.  Installation and operation of water intakes could have a significant
                impact on fish concentrations, through impingement of juveniles and adults, or
                entrainment of eggs and larval stages.         Elimination of wetland habitats
                (including submergent aquatic beds), and further human encroachment into the
                river channel, would severely reduce its value to fish and wildlife. Existing
                areas of natural vegetation bordering the river should be maintained for their
                value as cover, perching sites. and buffer zones.
  0                                                      11-65










             KNOWLEDGEABLE CONTACTS:

             Tom Hart or Greg Capobianco
             Division of Coastal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization
             NYS Department of State
             162 Washington Avenue
             Albany, NY 12231
             Phone: (518) 474-6000

             Carl Widmer, Fisheries Manager
             or Larry Myers, Wildlife Manager
             or Matt Sanderson, Environmental Protection Biologist
             NYSDEC - Region 8
             6274 E. Avon-Lima Road
             Avon, N.Y., 14414
             Phone: (716) 226-2466

             NYSDEC - Information Services
             700 Troy-Schenectady Road
             Latham, NY 12110
             Phone: (518) 783-3932

             Robert Stevenson, Chairman
             Rochester Environmental Commission
             City of Rochester
             City Hall
             30 Church Street
             Rochester, NY 14614





























                                                      11-66






   0




















































                                                                  SECTION III: POLICIES





  0










                                                CITY OF ROCHESTEX

                                    LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN

                           SECTION III: HATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN POLICIES

                                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

               POLICY NtMBER                                                                    PAGE

               POLICY 1    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        111-5

               POLICY  2   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          111-6

               POLICY  3 (Not Applicable)   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       111-8

               POLICY  4 (Not Applicable)     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       111-8

               POLICY  5   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          111-8

               POLICY  6   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            111-10

               POLICY  7   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      *  .      111-11

               POLICY  8   . o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         o 111-14

               POLICY  9   o. . . . . . . . . . .    o . .      o o . .       o. . . . . . .    111-16

               POLICY  10  (Not Applicable)   . . . . . . . . . .   o  . . . . . . . . . . .    111-18

               POLICY  11  . . . . . . . .  o . . o  . .      o o . . . . . . . . . . . .     o 111-18

               POLICY  12  . . . . . o . o  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     o. . . . . . .    111-20

               POLICY  13  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   *  . I. . . . . . . . . . .   0 .  . 111-21

               POLICY  14  . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     o . . .      o o  . . .  111-22

               POLICY  15  . . . . . . . . . . . .   o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      111-23

               POLICY  16  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        111-23

               POLICY  17  . . . . . .  o . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       o 111-24

               POLICY  18  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     o o . . . . . . . . .    111-26

               POLICY  19  . . . . . . . . .  o  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      111-26

               POLICY  20  . . . . . . . . . . .     . . . . . . .            . o . . . . . .   111-28

               POLICY  21  . . .                                              . . . . . . . .   111-29



                                                        111-3










                POLICY NtMBER                                                                  PAGE

                POLICY 22  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-31

                POLICY 23  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-32

                POLICY 24  (Not Applicable)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-34

                POLICY 25  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-34

                POLICY 26  (Not Applicable)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-36

                POLICY 27  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111.;-36

                POLICY 28  (Not Applicable)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-37

                POLICY 29  (Not Applicable)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-38

                POLICY 30  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-38

                POLICY 31  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-38

                POLICY 32  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-39

                POLICY 33  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-39

                POLICY 34  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-40

                POLICY 35  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-40

                POLICY 36  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-41

                POLICY 37  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-42

                POLICY 38  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-42

                POLICY 39  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-43

                POLICY 40  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-44

                POLICY 41  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-44

                POLICY 42  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-44

                POLICY 43  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-45

                POLICY 44  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     111-45







                                                       111-4









              POLICY 1           RESTORE,   REVITALIZE   AND    REDEVELOP    DETERIORATED    AND
                                 UNDERUTILIZED WATERFRONT AREAS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL,
                                 CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL AND OTHER COMPATIBLE USES.


              POLICY IA          REDEVELOP VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND AND STRUCTURES LOCATED
                                 AT THE FORMER PORT AUTHORITY SITE AT THE MOUTH OF THE GENESEE
                                 RIVER, TO INCLUDE A NIX OF WATER-ORIENTED COMMERCIAL AND
                                 RECRUTIONAL USES.

              POLICY IB          REDEVELOP VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND AND STRUCTURES, IN THE
                                 VICINITY OF RIVER STREET, ADJACENT TO THE WEST BANK OF THE
                                 GENESEE RIVER, TO INCLUDE WATER-ORIENTED COMMERCIAL AND
                                 RECREATIONAL USES.

              POLICY IC          UPGRADE EXISTING COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE
                                 OF LAKE AVENUE, HEAR THE PORT SITE.

              POLICY ID          REHABILITATE THE BATHHOUSE AND ADJACENT BEACH AREAS AT DURAND-
                                 EASTMAN   PARK   TO    SUPPORT   APPROPRIATE     WATER-ORIENTED
                                 RECREATIONAL USES.

              POLICY IE          PROMOTE THE REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT LAND WITHIN SUBARU E
                                 (INDUSTRIAL AREAS) WITH RECREATIONAL USES, FACILITIES AND
                                 ACTIVITIES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT IN
                                 THESE AREAS.

              POLICY IF          DEVELOP, IN CONJUNCTION WITH MONROE COUNTY, A PUBLIC BOAT
                                 LAUNCH FACILITY ALONG THE EAST BANK OF THE GENESEE RIVER,
                                 IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH OF THE STUTSON STREET BRIDGE.

              POLICY IG          PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE THE CONTINUED REDEVELOPMENT AND
                                 IMPROVEMENT   OF    VARIOUS    RECREATIONAL    FACILITIES     AT
                                 DURAND-USTMAN PARK, ONTARIO BEACH PARK, TURNING POINT PARK,
                                 SENECA PARK, MAPLEWOOD PARK, AND LOWER FALLS PARK.


              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              The waterfront areas along Lake Ontario and the Genesee River are among the most
              important recreational , aesthetic and economic resources in the region. Federal ,
              state and local agencies intend to restore, revitalize and redevelop deteriorated
              and underutilized waterfront areas by encouraging uses or activities appropriate
              for   the  waterfront    revitalization   area    based   on   their   water    and
              recreation-oriented characteristics.

              Several significant development opportunity areas have been identified within the
              city's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) boundary.       These sites
              include the Port Authority site at the mouth of the river on Lake Ontario, the
              River Street area along the west bank of the river north of Stutson Street, the
              Lake Avenue commercial corridor north of Stutson Street, the eastern bank of the
              river, just south of Stutson Street, and the various public parks located along

                                                    I11_5









               the river and lake, including Ontario Beach Park, Durand-Eastman Park, Turning
               Point Park, Seneca Park, Maplewood Park and Lower Falls Park.

               In addition, there are several sites within the city's LWRP boundary that are
               zoned for industrial use. These sites include the Portland Cement Co., located
               on the west bank of the river just south of the Turning Basin, R.G.&E.'s Station
               5 power plant located in the river gorge near the Lower Falls, and Eastman Kodak
               Company's Waste Treatment Plant located on the west bank of the river, just north
               of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge.     These uses are water-dependent and will
               continue for the fore-seeable future.    If these uses were to be discontinued,
               however, redevelopment options should be encouraged which would result in a more
               appropriate water-oriented land use for the area.

               When an action is proposed to take place in these opportunity areas, the
               following guidelines will be used:

                      (1)  Priority should be given to uses which are dependent on a location
                           adjacent to the water;

                      (2)  The action should enhance existing and anticipated uses;

                      (3)  The action should serve as a catalyst to private investment in the
                           area;

                      (4)  The action should improve the deteriorated condition of a site, and
                           should, at a minimum, not cause further deterioration;

                      (5)  The action must lead to development which is compatible with the
                           character of the area, with consideration given to scale,
                           architectural style, density and intensity of use;

                      (6)  The action should have the potential to improve the existing
                           economic base of the community, and, at a minimum, must not
                           jeopardize this base;

                      (7)  The action should improve adjacent and upland views of the water,
                           and, at a minimum, must not affect these views in an insensitive
                           manner; and

                      (8)  The action should have the potential to improve the potential for
                           multiple uses of the site.

               The standards and guidelines associated with the city's Overlay Harbor Town
               Design District will be used to ensure that deteriorated and underutilized areas
               are developed appropriately.

               POLICY 2           FACILITATE THE SITING OF WATER DEPENDENT USES AND FACILITIES
                                  ON OR ADJACENT TO COASTAL WATERS.

               POLICY 2A          EXISTING WATER DEPENDENT USES, AS IDENTIFIED IN SECTION IV:
                                  USES AND PROJECTS, WILL BE MAINTAINED.


                                                     111-6











               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               Because of the location of sensitive environmental features in the shore zone and
               the general competition for waterfront locations of various types of land uses,
               there is a limited amount of waterfront land that is actually suitable for
               development within the LWRP boundary. The development of waterfront areas has
               not always been based upon whether or not the particular land use actually
               requires a specific location on the waterfront.           Agencies recognize that
               water-dependent uses and activities should have priority over non -water -dependent
               uses in terms of development within the shore zone. In order to ensure that
               water-dependent uses can be located and developed in waterfront locations,
               government    agencies   will    avoid    undertaking,    funding,    or    approving
               non -water -dependent actions or activities when such actions or activities
               conflict with the development of water-dependent uses or would pre-empt the
               reasonably foreseeable development of water-dependent uses in the same area.

               For the purposes of the LWRP, government agencies will consider the following
               uses and facilities to be water-dependent:

                      (a)   Uses which involve the transfer of goods (i.e., shipping activities
                            at the port site and at the Portland Cement site just south of the
                            turning basin);
                      (b)   Recreational activities requiring access to coastal waters (i.e.,
                            fishing, boating, and swimming);
                      (c)   Navigational structures (i.e., lighthouses and piers);
                      (d)   Boat and ship service and storage facilities (i.e., marinas and boat
                            yards);
                      (e)   Flood and erosion control structures (i.e., river bulkheads and
                            beach groins);
                      (f)   Uses which rely upon transportation of raw materials or products on
                            water when such transportation would be difficult on land (i.e.,
                            cement plants);
                      (g)   Uses which require large amounts of cooling or processing water
                            (i.e., power plants and waste treatment plants);
                      (h)   Scientific and educational activities requiring access to coastal
                            waters (i.e., maritime museum); and
                      (i)   Facilities that support or enhance water dependent uses.

               Existing water dependent uses located within the LWRP boundary include various
               commercial, industrial and shipping activities, a waste treatment plant, a
               -hydroelectric power plant, marinas and other fishing and boating facilities, as
               well as certain miscellaneous recreational uses. These uses and activities are
               scattered throughout the waterfront area and are, in some instances, located
               adjacent to sensitive environmental areas.        Marinas and related fishing and
               boating facilities are concentrated at the northern end of the Genesee River,
               near Lake Ontario.

               Existing municipal zoning district regulations and procedures, the local site
               plan review process, as well as the intermunicipal review and coordination of
               waterfront activities have determined the location, nature and extent of existing
               water-dependent uses in the shore zone. These procedures and regulations were


                                                       111-7









               developed, in part, to control and promote appropriate water-dependent uses along
               the lake and river.

               When an action is proposed, the following guidelines will be used:

                     (a)    Water-dependent uses should be matched with compatible sites or
                            locations in order to reduce conflicts between competing uses, to
                            protect coastal resources, and to address impacts on the real estate
                            market;

                     (b)    Water-dependent uses should be sited with consideration to the
                            availability of public infrastructure including sewers, water,
                            access and transportation;

                     (c)    Water-dependent uses should be compatible with surrounding land
                            uses;

                     (d)    Underutilized, shoreline sites should be given special consideration
                            for water-dependent uses; and

                     (e)    Water-dependent uses should be sited with consideration to
                            increasing demand, long-term space needs and the possibility of
                            future expansion.

               POLICY 3           ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE'S EXISTING MAJOR PORTS
                                  OF ALBANY, BUFFALO, NEW YORK, OGDENSBURG, AND OSWEGO AS
                                  CENTERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, AND ENCOURAGE THE SITING, IN
                                  THESE PORT AREAS, INCLUDING THOSE UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF
                                  STATE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES, OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS
                                  ESSENTIAL TO OR IN SUPPORT OF WATERBORME TRANSPORTATION OF
                                  CARGO AND PEOPLE.


               EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

               This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP because Rochester is not one of
               the major ports listed.

               POLICY 4           STRENGTHEN THE ECONOMIC BASE OF SMALLER HARBOR AREAS BY
                                  ENCOURAGING THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENHANCEMENT OF THOSE
                                  TRADITIONAL USES AND ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE PROVIDED SUCH AREAS
                                  WITH THEIR UNIQUE MARITIME IDENTITY.


               EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

               This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP because Rochester does not have
               a small harbor area as defined by the state.

               POLICY 5           ENCOURAGE THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WHERE PUBLIC
                                  SERVICES AND FACILITIES ESSENTIAL TO SUCH DEVELOPMENT ARE
                                  ADEQUATE, EXCEPT WHEN SUCH DEVELOPMENT HAS SPECIAL FUNCTIONAL

                                                     111-8









                                REQUIREMENTS OR OTHER CHARACTERISTICS WHICH NECESSITATES ITS
                                LOCATION IN OTHER COASTAL AREAS.

              POLICY SA         PROMOTE AND  ENCOURAGE APPROPRIATE WATER-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
                                ON THE PORT AUTHORITY SITE.



              POLICY 5B         PROMOTE AND  ENCOURAGE APPROPRIATE WATER-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
                                ALONG RIVER  STREET, NORTH OF THE STUTSON STREET BRIDGE, AND
                                UPGRADE THE  EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE AREA.

              POLICY SC         PROMOTE AND  ENCOURAGE APPROPRIATE RESIDE]KTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN
                                THE BOXART STREEr-BURLEY ROAD UPLAND AREA.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              New development proposed within the LWRP boundary should be adequately serviced
              by existing or upgraded public services and facilities.       Almost all major
              development areas within the LWRP boundary are currently serviced by adequate
              public services and facilities including vehicular access, storm and sanitary
              sewers, as well as electric, gas and water lines.       If a given area is not
              currently serviced by adequate public services and facilities, upgrades,
              extensions or connections to existing systems are usually possible. The specific
              development proposals outlined in POLICY 1 will involve an analysis of existing
              public services and facilities in the areas proposed for development, as well as
              possible rehabilitation or upgrading of those services and facilities as a part
              of the actual implementation of the development project.

              In assessing the adequacy of an area's infrastructure and public services, the
              following points shall be considered:

                    (a)   Whether or not streets and highways serving the proposed site can
                          safely accommodate the peak traffic generated by the proposed
                          development;

                    (b)   Whether or not the development's water needs can be met by the
                          existing water system;

                    (c)   Whether or not wastes generated by the development can be handled by
                          sewage disposal systems;

                    (d)   Whether or not energy needs of the proposed development can be
                          accommodated by existing utility systems;

                    (e)   Whether or not stormwater runoff from the proposed site can be
                          accommodated by on-site and/or off-site facilities; and

                    (f)   Whether or not schools, police and fire protection, and health and
                          social services are adequate to meet the needs of any expected
                          increase in population resulting from the proposed development.










               The Port Authority site is serviced by separate sanitary and storm sewer systems
               maintained by Monroe County. The existing 120 sanitary sewer runs across the
               middle of the site and may need to be realigned in order to develop the site as
               proposed in the concept plan.     The existing sanitary sewer system and the
               existing sewer pump station have enough capacity to accommodate the redevelopment
               plan proposed for the site. The existing 600-720 storm sewer system for the port
               area runs under Estes Street and Beach Avenue. Monroe County has indicated that
               this sewer is also adequate to handle redevelopment of the site. The site is
               adequately serviced by gas, electric, water and telephone lines.        Vehicular
               access to the port site from the city is via Lake Avenue. Lake Avenue is a minor
               arterial which, in the area of the port site, is in relatively good condition but
               could use some physical improvements including intersection widenings and new
               streetscape treatments.

               The River Street area is also proposed for major redevelopment., This area is
               serviced by a sanitary sewer system with a pump station located at the northern
               end of River Street.    This system is adequate to accommodate the proposed
               development plan. Because there is no storm sewer system within the River Street
               area, any redevelopment would require significant storm sewer improvements.
               While this site is also serviced by existing gas, electric, water and telephone
               lines, redevelopment would probably require the installation of underground
               telephone and electric systems. Because the pavement condition of River Street
               is fair to poor, significant street reconstruction and/or rehabilitation would
               be required as a part of any redevelopment plan for the area.

               POLICY 6          EXPEDITE PERMIT PROCEDURES IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE SITING
                                 OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AT SUITABLE LOCATIONS.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               Government agencies recognize the need for efficient and uncomplicated permit
               approval procedures for development activities proposed within the LWRP boundary.
               The local permit review and approval process should not be designed to restrict
               or impede development applications or proposals. The city has developed a permit
               review and approval system which includes coordination with other local and state
               agencies and eliminates unnecessary or duplicative levels of review.

               Site plan review is coordinated by the City Bureau of Zoning as are requests for
               zoning variances, rezonings and subdivision approval. Environmental impacts and
               other areas of special concern for proposed development are considered early in
               the review process and are investigated in conjunction with the City Office of
               Planning as well as the City's Environmental Commission. The entire process is
               characterized by reasonable timetables and deadlines, relatively simple paper
               work, and specific but uncomplicated development review standards.               A
               "one-stop-shopu approach has been developed by the city which allows developers
               to become aware of permit procedures and requirements and obtain all necessary
               paper work at one location and at one time. Where necessary and appropriate,
               special considerations for development activities proposed within the LWRP
               boundary will be included in the city permit review and approval procedures in
               order to further simplify those requirements.



                                                     III-10








              State agencies and local governments should make every effort to coordinate their
              permit procedures and regulatory programs for waterfront development, as long as
              the integrity of the regulations' objectives is not jeopardized. Also, efforts
              should be made to ensure that each agency's procedures are synchronized with
              those of other agencies within a given level of government. Legislative and/or
              programmatic changes should be made, if necessary, to accomplish this.

              POLICY 7          SIGNIFICANT COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS IDENTIFIED
                                ON THE COASTAL AREA KAP, SHALL BE PROTECTED, PRESERVED, AND,
                                WHERE PRACTICAL, RESTORED SO AS TO NAINTAIN THEIR VIABILITY AS
                                HABITATS.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Habitat protection is recognized as fundamental to assuring the survival of fish
              and wildlife populations. Certain habitats are critical to the maintenance of
              a given population and, therefore, merit special protection.       Such habitats
              exhibit one or more of the following characteristics: (1) are essential to the
              survival of a large portion of a particular fish or wildlife population (e.g.
              feeding grounds, nursery areas); (2) support populations of rare and endangered
              species; (3) are found at a very low frequency within a coastal region; (4)
              support fish and wildlife populations having significant commercial and/or
              recreational value; and (5) would be difficult or impossible to replace.

              A habitat impairment test must be met for any activity that is subject to
              consistency review under federal and State laws, or under applicable local laws
              contained in an approved local waterfront revitalization program.        If that
              proposed action is subject to consistency review, then the habitat protection
              policy applies, whether the proposed action is to occur within or outside the
              designated area.

              The specific habitat impairment test that must be met is as follows:

                    In order to protect and preserve a significant habitat, land and water
                    uses or development shall not be undertaken if such actions would:

                    --destroy the habitat; or

                    --significantly impair the viability of a habitat.

              Habitat destruction is defined as the loss of fish or wildlife use through direct
              alteration, disturbance, or pollution of a designated area, or through the
              indirect effects of these actions on a designated area. Habitat destruction may
              be indicated by changes in vegetation, substrate, or hydrology, or increases in
              runoff, erosion, sedimentation, or pollutants.

              Significant impairment is defined as reduction in vital resources (e.g., food,
              shelter, living space) or change in environmental conditions (e.g., temperature,
              substrate, salinity) beyond the tolerance range of an organism. Indicators of
              a significantly impaired habitat focus on ecological alterations and may include,
              but are not limited to, reduced carrying capacity, changes in community structure









               (food chain relationships, species diversity), reduced productivity and/or
               increased incidence of disease and mortality.

               The tolerance range of an organism is not defined-as the physiological range of
               conditions beyond which a species will not survive at all, but as the ecological
               range of conditions that supports the species' population or has the potential
               to support a restored population, where practical.          Either the loss of
               individuals through an increase in emigration or an increase in death rate
               indicates that the tolerance range of an organism has been exceeded. An abrupt
               increase in death rate may occur as an environmental factor falls beyond a
               tolerance limit ( a range has both upper and lower limits). Many environmental
               factors, however, do not have a sharply defined tolerance limit, but produce
               increasing emigration or death rates with increasing departure from conditions
               that are optimal for the species.

               The range of parameters which should be considered in applying the habitat
               impairment test include:

                     1.     Physical parameters, such as living space circulation, flushing
                            rates, tidal amplitude, turbidity, water temperature, depth
                            (including loss of littoral zone), morphology, substrate type,
                            vegetation, structure, erosion and sedimentation rates;

                     2.     Biological parameters, such as community structure, food chain
                            relationships, species diversity, predator/prey relationships,
                            population size, mortality rates, reproductive rates, meristic
                            features, behavioral patterns and migratory patterns; and
                     3.     Chemical parameters, such as dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide,
                            acidity, dissolved solids, nutrients, organics, salinity, and
                            pollutants (heavy metals, toxics and hazardous materials).

               Significant  coastal fish and wildlife habitats are evaluated, designated and
               mapped pursuant to the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act
               (Executive Law of New York, Article 42).      The New York State Department of
               Environmental Conservation (DEC) evaluates the significance of coastal fish and
               wildlife habitats, and following a recommendation from the DEC, the Department
               of State designates and maps specific areas.

               POLICY 7A                PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE GENESEE RIVER IN ORDER TO
                                        NAINTAIN ITS VIABILITY AS A FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT OF
                                        STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE.


               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               NYSDOS has designated the Genesee River as a significant coastal fish and
               wildlife habitat area of state-wide significance within the LWRP boundary. (See
               the Appendix to the Inventory and Analysis for a detailed description of this
               habitat).    The Genesee River habitat is a major tributary of Lake Ontario,
               located in the city. The habitat includes a six and one-half mile long segment
               of the river, extending from Lake Ontario to the Lower Falls, which is a natural
               impassable barrier to fish.

                                                     111-12








               The large size of this river and the fact that much of the river corridor is
               essentially undisturbed, makes this one of the most important potential fish and
               wildlife habitats in the Great Lakes Plain ecological region. Resident species
               such as small mouth bass, brown bullhead and northern pike, and lake run species
               such as white bass and yellow perch are supplemented by seasonal influxes of
               large numbers of trout and salmon. The river provides throughout New York State
               and beyond. Although the seasonal salmonid runs attract the greatest number of
               fishermen to the area, the river also supports an active warmwater fishery.
               Wildlife use of the river appears to be limited to those species that can inhabit
               a relatively narrow riparian corridor, and are somewhat tolerant of human
               activities in adjacent areas.

               Any activity that substantially degrades water quality, increases temperature or
               turbidity, reduces flows, or increases water level fluctuations in the Genesee
               River would affect the biological productivity of this area. Important species
               of fish and wildlife would be adversely affected by water pollution, such as
               chemical contamination (including food chain effects), oil spills, excessive
               turbidity, and waste disposal . Continued efforts should be made to improve water
               quality in the river, which is primarily dependent upon controlling discharges
               from combined sewer overflows, industrial point sources, ships, and agricultural
               lands in the watershed.

               The existing navigation channel should be dredged between mid-May and mid-August
               or between mid-November and early April in order to avoid impacts on the habitat
               use by migrating salmonids. Activities that would affect the habitat above the
               navigation channel should not be conducted during the period from March through
               July in order to protect warmwater fish habitat values. New dredging (outside
               the existing navigation channel) would likely result in the direct removal of
               warmwater fish habitat values and should not be permitted. Contaminated dredge
               spoils should be deposited in upland containment areas.        Barriers to fish
               migration, whether physical or chemical, would have significant effects on fish
               populations within the river, and in adjacent Lake Ontario waters. Installation
               and operation of water intakes could have a significant impact on fish
               concentrations, through impingement of juveniles and adults, or entrainment of
               eggs and larval stages. Elimination of wetland habitats (including submergent
               aquatic beds), and further human encroachment into the river channel, would
               severely reduce its value to fish and wildlife.       Existing areas of natural
               vegetation bordering the river should be maintained for their value as cover,
               perching sites, and buffer zones.
               The water quality of the river and lake has continued to improve over the past
               several years.  Both currently support a significant variety of fish species.
               Among the fish found within the LWRP boundary are American Eel, Northern Pike,
               Goldfish, Carp, White Channel Catfish, White Perch, White Bass, Rock Bass, Small
               Mouth Bass, Blackeye Crappie and Walleye. Additionally, the river is the site
               of significant spawning runs for a variety of fish including the Chinook and Coho
               Salmon, as well as the Brown and Steelhead Trout. Preservation of lake and river
               wetland areas is an important element of the city's program to preserve and
               protect fish habitats within the LWRP boundary.




                                                    111-13










               POLICY 7B         PROTECT AND PRESERVE DURAND-EASTNAN PARK, TURNING POINT PARK,
                                 SENECA PARK AND NAPLEWOOD PARK AS LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT FISH AND
                                 WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS.

               POLICY 7C         PROTECT AND PRESERVE FORMERLY OWNED CONRAIL PROPE]tTY, ALONG
                                 THE EAST BANK OF THE GENESEE RIVER, OPPOSITE THE TUNING
                                 BASIN, AS A LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT AREA.


               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               Durand-Eastman Park, Turning Point Park, Seneca Park, Maplewood Park, as well as
               most of the river gorge, function as a natural wildlife habitat area. Durand-
               Eastman Park contains a significant wild deer population as well as wetland areas
               that provide habitats for several fish and wildlife species. Bullock's Woods in
               Turni ng Poi nt Park i s a I arge, heavi I y wooded area that al so provi des habi tat for
               several species of wildlife. Government agencies will continue to promote and
               encourage various redevelopment activities within these parks which will preserve
               and protect their significance as wildlife habitats.

               The standards and guidelines in the city's environmental review procedures will
               be used to ensure that locally significant fish and wildlife habitat areas within
               the LWRP boundary are protected.    Development actions within 100 feet of the
               river and lake, within areas zoned as open space, in heavily wooded areas, and
               within state-designated freshwater wetlands are Type I actions under the City's
               Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, since these locations have been
               designated as critical environmental areas. Type I actions require a complete
               environmental impact review. As part of this review, a project's impacts on fish
               and wildlife habitat areas would be determined and addressed, and mitigation
               measures could be proposed, if required, to protect those areas from adverse
               impacts.

               Activities most likely to affect significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats
               include the draining of ponds and wetlands, the filling of wetlands or shallow
               areas of streams, lakes and bays, grading of land, clear cutting, dredging and
               excavation, dredge spoil disposal, physical alteration of shore areas, and the
               introduction, storage or disposal of pollutants in upland areas or landfills.

               POLICY 8          PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES IN THE COASTAL AREA FRON
                                 THE INTRODUCTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES AND OTHER POLLUTANTS
                                 WHICH BIOACCUNULATE IN THE FOOD CHAIN OR WHICH CAUSE
                                 SIGNIFICANT SUBLETHAL OR LETHAL EFFECTS ON THOSE RESOURCES.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               Hazardous wastes are unwanted by-products of manufacturing processes and are
               generally characterized as being flammable, corrosive, reactive, or toxic. More
               specifically, hazardous waste is defined in Environmental Conservation Law [ï¿½27-
               0901.3] as ma waste or combination of wastes which because of its quantity,
               concentration, or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics may: (a)
               cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in
               serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible illness; or (b) pose a

                                                    111-14









              substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when
              improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed or otherwise managed. A list
              of hazardous wastes has been adopted by DEC (6 NYCRR Part 371).

              The handling, storage, transport, treatment and disposal of the materials
              included on the hazardous waste list adopted by NYSDEC and USEPA are strictly
              regulated in New York State to prevent their entry or introduction into the
              environment, particularly into the state's air, land and waters. Such controls
              should minimize possible contamination and bio-accumulation of these wastes in
              the state's coastal fish and wildlife resources at levels that would cause
              mortality or create physiological and behavioral disorders.

              "Other pollutantsu are those conventional wastes, generated from point and non-
              point sources, and not identified as hazardous wastes but controlled through
              other state laws.

              The following state laws enforce this policy:

                    (a)   Industrial Hazardous Waste Management Act.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 27, Title 9)

                    (b)   State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 17, Title 8)

                    (c)   State Certification.
                          Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Section 401)

                    (d)   Toxic Substances Monitoring Program.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 17)

                    (e)   Substances Hazardous to the Environment.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 37)

                    (f)   Solid Waste Management.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 27, Title 7)

                    (g)   Control of Pollution Injurious to Fish and Shellfish.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 13-0345 and Article 17-0503)

                    (h)   Stream Pollution Prohibited.
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 11-0503)

                    (i)   Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Compensation.
                          Navigation Law (Article 12)

                    (j)   Siting of Major Steam/Electric Generating Facilities.
                          Public Service Law (Article VIII)

                    (k)   Sanitary Code.
                          Public Health Law (Article 3)



                                                   111-15









               The city and Monroe County are participating in a Combined Sewer Overflow
               Abatement Program (CSOAP) which will eliminate combined storm and sanitary sewers
               in many areas of the city. This project involves the construction of several
               large underground holding tunnels which will discharge sewage and storm water,
               collected after major rainfalls, to the Frank E. VanLare Treatment Plant located
               in Durand-Eastman Park.    Prior to the construction of these tunnels, large
               volumes of combined sewage and storm water that occurred after major rainfalls
               in the area flowed directly into the river and lake without being treated. This
               sewage contributed to pollution problems in the river and lake and the
               destruction of fish and wildlife species.    The completion of the underground
               holding tunnels will eliminate a major source of pollution discharge into the
               river and lake that will help improve aquatic habitat for the area.

               Eastman Kodak Company operates a large industrial waste treatment facility on the
               western bank of the river, opposite Seneca Park. This treatment plant handles
               industrial sewage and waste from Kodak Park manufacturing facilities located on
               Lake Avenue and Ridge Road West. This treatment plant also helps to preserve
               existing fish species in the river and lake by eliminating the dumping of
               otherwise harmful or toxic substances into the water.

               The city is participating, along with other governmental agencies, in the
               development of a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for the Rochester Embayment. A RAP
               is an agreement among federal, state, and I ocal governments, with the support of
               area citizens, on a plan to restore the water quality and beneficial uses of the
               waters of the Area of Concern. The goal of the Rochester Embayment RAP is to
               develop an implementation plan that will improve the water quality of Lake
               Ontario and all of the waterways that flow into it, including the Genesee River.
               The implementation of the RAP for the Rochester Embayment will help to protect
               fish and wildlife resources from the introduction of hazardous wastes and other
               pollutants.

               POLICY 9           EXPAND RECREATIONAL USE OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES IN
                                  COASTAL AREAS BY INCREASING ACCESS TO EXISTING RESOURCES,
                                  SUPPLEMENTING EXISTING STOCKS AND DEVELOPING NEW RESOURCES.
                                  SUCH EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE IN A KANNER WHICH ENSURES THE
                                  PROTECTION OF RENEWABLE FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES AND
                                  CONSIDERS OTHER ACTIVITIES DEPENDENT ON THEM.


               POLICY 9A          EXPAND RECREATIONAL FISHING OPPORTUNITIES AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO
                                  OTHER WILDLIFE RESOURCES WITHIN DURAKD-EASTMAN PARK, TURNING
                                  POINT PARK, SENECA PARK, MAPLEWOOD PARK AND LAKE ONTARIO, BY
                                  PROVIDING OR IMPROVING VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE
                                  WATERFRONT.

               POLICY 9B          DEVELOP, IN CONJUNCTION WITH MONROE COUNTY. A PUBLIC BOAT
                                  LAUNCH FACILITY IN THE AREA ALONG THE EAST BANK OF THE GENESEE
                                  RIVER, IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH OF THE STUTSON STREET BRIDGE.






                                                    111-16






   0         EXPLANATION OF POLICIES
             Increasing public access to existing fish and wildlife resources located within
             the LWRP boundary is an important objective of the city's LWRP. As the water
             quality of the river and lake has improved over the past several years, sport
             fishing has become a significant local recreational activity in the Rochester
             metropolitan area.   The river is a major fall fishery for Chinook Salmon and
             serves as a focus for salmon fishing. Late in the summer, the Eastern -Southern
             Lake Ontario (ESLO) Sport Fishing Derby is held on Lake Ontario. This event also
             generates substantial local interest and participation.

             There are few well-developed public access points along the river for fishermen.
             The primary access points for fishing along the river include the base of the
             Lower Falls, which can be accessed by a RGH service road on the east bank, the
             east and west piers located on Lake Ontario at the mouth of the river, as well
             as waterfront areas within Turning Point Park.      In addition, fishermen also
             access the Lower Falls area from steep and unsafe trails along the west bank of
             the river. The use of these trails by the public is not condoned or promoted.

             Government agencies, including the city and Monroe County, will promote and
             encourage the development and expansion of recreational fishing opportunities and
             public access to other wildlife resources at several public parks located within
             the LWRP boundary. These parks include Durand-Eastman Park and Ontario Beach
             Park which are located on Lake Ontario, and Turning Point Park, Seneca Park, and
             Maplewood Park which are located along the river.      Expansion of recreational
             fishing opportunities should involve provision of direct public access to the
             shoreline for fishermen as well as boaters.       Improvements will include the
             development of parking areas, access trails, fishing piers, wharves and boating
             facilities in appropriate areas within the parks.       Provisions for increased
             public access to other wildlife resources located within these parks would
             include the rehabilitation or construction of hiking trails, pedestrian paths,
             overlooks and shelters.

             Government agencies will promote and encourage the development of a public boat
             launch facility along the eastern bank of the Genesee River, just south of the
             Stutson Street Bridge, to improve and expand recreational fishing opportunities
             for boaters an the Genesee River and Lake Ontario. The area proposed for the
             boat launch is largely vacant with the exception of deteriorated boat slips and
             mi scel I aneous mari na-rel ated uses and acti vi ti es. The f aci I i ty wi 11 be devel oped
             in conjunction with Monroe County.

             POLICY 9 suggests that state and local actions within the LWRP boundary should
             balance the continued maintenance and protection of fish and wildlife resources
             with increased public access to and recreational use of those resources. The
             control of fish stocking within the river or lake is coordinated by the NYSDEC.
             When appropriate, the state is encouraged to continue and expand its fish
             stocking program and the completion of studies concerning habitat maintenance and
             improvement.   Stocking programs should be directed towards areas where known
             habitats will support and enhance increased fish populations.




                                                   111-17









               The following additional guidelines should be considered by local, state and
               federal agencies as they determine the consistency of their proposed action with
               the above policy:

                     (1)   Consideration should be made as to whether an action will impede
                           existing or future utilization of the state's recreational fish and
                           wildlife resources;

                     (2)   Efforts to increase access to recreational fish and wildlife
                           resources should not lead to overutilization of that resource or
                           cause impairment of the habitat;

                     (3)   The impacts of increasing access to recreational fish and wildlife
                           resources should be determined on a case-by-case basis, consulting
                           the significant habitat narrative (see POLICY 7 and the Appendix to
                           the Inventory and Analysis) and/or conferring with a trained fish
                           and wildlife biologist; and

                     (4)   Any public or private sector initiatives to supplement existing
                           stocks or develop new resources must be done in accordance with
                           existing state law.

               POLICY 10          FURTHER DEVELOP COMMERCIAL FINFISH, SHELLFISH AND CRUSTACEAN
                                  RESOURCES IN THE COASTAL AREA BY: (1) ENCOURAGING THE
                                  CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING ON SHORE
                                  COMMERCIAL FISHING FACILITIES; (2) INCREASING MARKETING OF THE
                                  STATE'S SEAFOOD PRODUCTS; AND (3) MAINTAINING ADEQUATE STOCKS
                                  AND EXPANDING AQUACULTURE FACILITIES. SUCH EFFORTS SHALL BE
                                  MADE IN A KANNER WHICH ENSURES THE PROTECTION OF SUCH
                                  RENEWABLE FISH RESOURCES AND CONSIDERS OTHER ACTIVITIES
                                  DEPENDENT ON THEM.


               EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

               This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP because there are no commercial
               finfish, shellfish and crustacean resources located within Rochester's LWRP
               boundary.

               POLICY 11          BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES WILL BE SITED IN THE COASTAL
                                  AREA SO AS TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO PROPERTY AND THE ENDANGERING
                                  OF HUMAN LIVES CAUSED BY FLOODING AND EROSION.

               POLICY 11A         DISCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE TOP OF THE RIVERBANK, ON THE
                                  STEEP SLOPES WITHIN THE RIVER GORGE, WITHIN DESIGNATED COASTAL
                                  EROSION HAZARD AREAS, OR IN ANY OTHER AREAS EXPERIENCING OR
                                  SUSCEPTIBLE TO EROSION.

               POLICY 11B         BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES WITHIN DESIGNATED FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
                                  WILL BE SITED IN THE COASTAL AREA TO COMPLY WITH CONSTRUCTION
                                  AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT


                                                     111-18









                                   AGENCY (FEKA) AND THE U.S. DEPARTNENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
                                   DEVELOPMENT.



               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               Government agencies recognize the importance of regulating development in
               critical environmental areas such as erosion hazard areas and floodplains within
               the local waterfront revitalization boundary. Erosion hazard areas which have
               been identified by New York State include the share zones along Beach Avenue and
               within Ontario Beach Park and a major portion of Durand-Eastman Park. The beach
               areas contained within these parks are considered natural protective features
               (see Policy 12). Floodplain areas are those areas identified as flood hazards
               on the Flood Insurance Maps filed with the City of Rochester. All of these areas
               contain physical features or conditions that naturally limit development and that
               may also enhance aesthetic or wildlife resources within the shore zone.
               Unregulated development in these areas could cause severe erosion and flooding
               problems, loss of property and other valuable resources, as well as potential
               loss of life.

               Much of the land within the LWRP boundary that is designated as a floodplain or
               an erosion hazard area, or that contains steep slopes in excess of 15%, is in
               public ownership and is zoned as open space.         The city's Open Space District
               regulates development in these critical environmental areas by limiting the types
               of uses and activities permitted. Lands zoned for open space within the LWRP
               boundary will remain in their natural state and will contribute to the
               enhancement and protection of other features in the waterfront area.

               City Zoning Code regulations require a special permit for development located
               within a designated floodplain. This permit is reviewed and approved by the City
               Planning Commission following a public hearing. The special permit can only be
               approved if the applicant demonstrates, among other items, that the proposed
               development will be constructed above the base flood elevation at the particular
               location and that the development will not cause or increase flooding in the area
               or within the floodway in general.         The standards and guidelines which all
               government agencies will use to evaluate development in flood hazard areas are
               included in Section 115.29 of the Rochester Zoning Code. These standards and
               guidelines deal with such items as anchoring of structures, appropriate
               construction materials, provision of utility service, etc.
               In addition to the zoning regulations cited above, the city's site plan review
               procedures will be followed to help ensure that proposed development activities
               do not cause or contribute to erosion and/or flooding problems within the LWRP
               boundary. Setback, lot size, and construction considerations, as well as the
               need for erosion control measures on site, can be identified and evaluated during
               this review process.
               Existing environmental review procedures and regulations will also be utilized
               to ensure that steep slopes and other areas prone to erosion as well as
               floodplain areas are protected within the LWRP boundary. Development proposed
               within 100 feet of the river and lake, within areas zoned as open space, in
               heavi I y wooded areas, wi thi n state-desi gnated freshwater wetl ands, and areas wi th

                                                        111-19









               a slope of 15% or greater are Type I actions under the City's Environmental
               Quality Review Ordinance, because these locations have been designated as
               critical environmental areas. Actions in these areas will require a complete
               environmental impact review. As a part of this review, a project's potential
               impacts on erosion, drainage and flooding problems would be determined and
               addressed, and mitigating measures, if required, could be proposed in order to
               protect those areas from adverse development impacts.

               POLICY 12          ACTIVITIES OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL AREA WILL BE
                                  UNDERTAKEN SO AS TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO NATURAL RESOURCES AND
                                  PROPERTY FROM FLOODING AM EROSION BY PROTECTING NATURAL
                                  PROTECTIVE FEATURES INCLUDING BEACHES, DUNES, BARRIER ISLANDS
                                  AND BLUFFS.     PRIMARY DUNES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALL
                                  ENCROACHMENTS THAT COULD IMPAIR THEIR NATURAL PROTECTIVE
                                  CAPACITY.

               POLICY 12A         PROTECT, AS NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURES, THE BEACH AREAS
                                  IDENTIFIED ON THE NEW YORK STATE COASTAL EROSION HAZARD NAP
                                  AND LOCATED ALONG BEACH AVENUE AND WITHIN ONTARIO BEACH PARK
                                  AND A MAJOR PORTION OF DURAND-EASTMAN PARK.



               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               The natural beach areas located along the shoreline of Lake Ontario and included
               within the LWRP boundary are considered to be critical environmental areas that
               need to be preserved and protected. These beach areas have been identified as
               natural protective features on the State Coastal Erosion Hazard Map. This policy
               will apply to these specific areas. . Portions of the city's inland coastal areas,
               including residential development located along Beach Avenue and recreational
               facilities located in Ontario Beach Park and Durand-Eastman Park, are protected
               from flooding and serious erosion by this sensitive beach area. Excavation and
               certain other development activities conducted on these fragile natural features
               could lead to their weakening or destruction and, consequently, to a loss of
               their protection of other coastal areas.

               The need to review and regulate development on or near the beach areas, and in
               nearshore areas and on underwater lands, to the extent they are within the city's
               municipal boundaries, is recognized, in order to minimize damage to property and
               other resources from lake flooding and erosion from high wave action.

               The standards and guidelines in the city's environmental review procedures will
               be used to ensure that beach areas prone to erosion and flooding are protected
               within the LWRP boundary. Development actions proposed within 100 feet of Lake
               Ontario are Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review
               Ordinance, since these areas have been designated as critical environmental
               areas. Such actions will require a complete environmental impact review. As a
               part of this review, a project's potential impacts on erosion, drainage and
               flooding problems would be determined and addressed, and mitigating measures, if
               required, could be proposed in order to protect those areas and surrounding
               development from adverse environmental impacts.


                                                     111-20






   0          POLICY 13         THE CONSTRUCTION OR RECONSTRUCTION OF EROSION PROTECTION
                                STRUCTURES SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN ONLY IF THEY HAVE A REASONABLE
                                PROBABILITY OF CONTROLLING EROSION FOR AT LEAST THIRTY YEARS
                                AS DEMONSTRATED IN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND/OR
                                ASSURED NAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS.


              Policy 13A        PROMOTE THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EAST AND VEST PIERS LOCATED ON
                                LAKE ONTARIO AT THE MOUTH OF THE GENESEE RIVER, AND THE
                                CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITIONAL EROSION PROTECTION STRUCTURE
                                WITHIN THE RIVER. AT THE OUTLET TO THE LAKE.


              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              Government agencies recognize the importance of constructing and maintaining
              erosion protection structures within the LWRP boundary that are designed to
              eliminate or reduce erosion problems along the river and lake and are based on
              accepted design and engineering standards and practices. This policy shall apply
              to structures designed to reduce or prevent erosion such as a groin, jetty,
              seawall, revetment, breakwater, artificial beach nourishment project, pier
              extensions or other similar types of erosion protection or control structures.
              The possibility of permitting the development of such structures that fail to
              provide adequate protection due to improper design, construction and/or
              maintenance, or that are otherwise inadequate to do the job they were intended
              to do should be avoided. Such a situation would only cause erosion.problems to
              continue or worsen.

              The standards and guidelines in the city's environmental and site plan review
              procedures should be used to ensure that erosion protection structures
              constructed within the LWRP boundary will have a reasonable probability of
              controlling erosion for at least thirty years and will be properly designed and
              maintained. Construction of such structures will require site plan review and
              approval by the city as well as an environmental impact review because it will
              be located within 100 feet of the lake. Such activities are Type I actions under
              the City's Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, since the 100 foot "buffer"
              area has been identified as a critical environmental area.      As a part of the
              environmental review, a project's potential impacts on erosion would be
              determined and addressed, and the ability of the structure to control erosion for
              the thirty year period, based on design and maintenance standards, could be
              evaluated.

              As a part of the review of the development of erosion control structures, all
              government agencies, including the city, will ensure that:

                    (a)    Long-term maintenance programs developed for the structure will
                           include specifications for normal maintenance of degradable
                           materials and the periodic replacement of removable materials;
                    (b)    All material used in the structure will be durable and capable of
                           withstanding inundation, wave impacts, weathering and other effects
  0                        of storm conditions; and
                                                    111-21









                     (c)   The construction, modification or restoration of the structure will
                           not have adverse impacts on natural protective features or other
                           natural resources.

               The maintenance of the east and west piers located on the lake and river is
               promoted and encouraged. The west pier provides some erosion protection from
               high wind and wave action for beach areas to the west and has probably
               contributed to the deposition of additional material and the creation of a larger
               beach area for Ontario Beach Park. In addition, the USACE should investigate a
               significant surge problem near the outlet of the Genesee River and evaluate the
               need for and design of an erosion control structure to be built within the river
               to eliminate this problem (see LWRP Section VI, Part 3).

               The construction of groins in the area of Durand-Eastman Park to control erosion
               of the beach in that area is also a possibility.       As noted in earlier LWRP
               policies, waterfront recreational facilities located within Durand-Eastman Park
               are proposed for significant redevelopment and/or rehabilitation.              The
               development of such erosion protection features will be evaluated in terms of
               their overall costs and benefits as well as environmental impacts.

               POLICY 14           ACTIVITIES AND DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING THE CONSTRUCTION OR
                                   RECONSTRUCTION OF EROSION PROTECTION STRUCTURES, SHALL BE
                                   UND ERTAKEN SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO MEASURABLE INCREASE IN
                                   EROSION OR FLOODING AT THE SITE OF SUCH ACTIVITIES OR
                                   DEVELOPMENT, OR AT OTHER LOCATIONS.


               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               Erosion and flooding are processes which occur naturally along almost all areas
               of the shoreline. However, there are many types of development activity that can
               increase the amount or severity of coastal flooding and/or erosion.          These
               activities include:

                (1)   the construction of such things as groins and impermeable docks which
                      block off-shore currents and sediment transport to adjacent shorelands,
                      thus increasing their rate of recession;

                (2)   improper shoreline development;

                (3)   improper   construction   and/or   maintenance   of   erosion    protection
                      structures; and

                (4)   the failure to maintain good       drainage or to restore land after
                      construction which would increase run-off and contribute to the erosion
                      and weakening of nearby shorelands.

               Such activities must be properly reviewed and regulated so that they do not
               contribute to erosion or flooding problems within the site or at other locations.




                                                    111-22









              The standards and guidelines in the city's environmental and site plan review
              procedures will be used to ensure that development proposed within the LWRP
              boundary, including the construction of erosion protection structures, will not
              cause or contribute to erosion or flooding problems.        Development actions
              proposed within 100 feet of the lake are Type I actions under the City's
              Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, since these areas have been designated
              as critical environmental areas. Actions in these areas will require a complete
              environmental impact review. As a part of this review and the site plan review
              process, a project's potential impacts on erosion, drainage and flooding problems
              would be identified and addressed, and necessary mitigating measures could be
              implemented in order to protect those areas and surrounding development from
              adverse environmental impacts.

              POLICY 15          MINING, EXCAVATION OR DREDGING IN COASTAL WATERS SHALL NOT
                                 SIGNIFICANTLY INTERFERE WITH THE NATURAL COASTAL PROCESSES
                                 WHICH SUPPLY BEACH MATERIALS TO LAND ADJACENT TO SUCH WATERS
                                 AND SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN IN A MANNER WHICH VILL NOT CAUSE AN
                                 INCREASE IN EROSION OF SUCH LAND.



              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Coastal processes, including the movement of beach materials by water, and any
              mining, excavation or dredging in nearshore or offshore waters which changes the
              supply and net flow of such materials, can deprive shorelands of their natural
              regenerative powers. Such mining, excavation and dredging should be accomplished
              in a manner so as not to cause a reduction of supply, and thus an increase of
              erosion, to such shorelands.

              The NYSDEC regulates dredging, mining and excavation activities in shoreline and
              wetland areas.  These regulations are comprehensive in design and intent and
              address actions according to their potential to interfere with the natural
              coastal processes which supply beach materials, as well as the potential for
              increasing erosion.

              POLICY 16          PUBLIC FUNDS SHALL ONLY BE USED FOR EROSION PROTECTIVE
                                 STRUCTURES WHERE NECESSARY TO PROTECT HUMAN LIFE. AND NEW
                                 DEVELOPMENT WHICH REQUIRES A LOCATION WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO
                                 AN EROSION HAZARD AREA TO BE ABLE TO FUNCTION, OR EXISTING
                                 DEVELOPMENT; AND ONLY WHERE THE PUBLIC BENEFITS OUTWEIGH THE
                                 LONG TERN MONETARY AND OTHER COSTS INCLUDING THE POTENTIAL
                                 FOR INCREASING EROSION AND ADVERSE EFFECTS ON NATURAL
                                 PROTECTIVE FUTURES.


              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Public funds are used for a variety of purposes along the city's shorelines.
              This policy recognizes the need for the protection of human life and the need for
              investment in existing or new development which requires a location near the
              coastal area or in adjacent waters in order to function.       However, it also
              recognizes the adverse impacts of such activities and development on the rates


                                                   111-23









               of erosion and on natural protective features and requires that careful analysis
               be made of such benefits and long term costs prior to expending public funds.

               Public funds should not be invested in the construction, rehabilitation,
               modification or maintenance of erosion protection structures for new or proposed
               development which is strictly "privateu in nature.        The need for and the
               construction of an erosion protection structure designed to eliminate river surge
               problems within the Genesee River will continue to be investigated.            The
               construction of such a structure would reduce erosion problems and protect and
               enhance existing and proposed marinas, boat launching ramps, and other commercial
               and recreational facilities which could be public or private, located along the
               river, near the outlet to Lake Ontario.

               POLICY 17           WHENEVER POSSIBLE, USE NONSTRUCTURAL NEASURES TO NININIZE
                                   DANAGE TO NATURAL RESOURCES AND PROPERTY FRON FLOODING AND
                                   EROSION. SUCH NEASURES SHALL INCLUDE:

                                   (1)   THE SET BACK OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES;

                                   (2)   THE PLANTING OF VEGETATION AND THE INSTALLATION OF
                                         SAND FENCING AND DRAINING;

                                   (3)   THE RESHAPING OF BLUFFS; AND

                                   (4)   THE FLOOD-PROOFING OF BUILDINGS OR THEIR ELEVATION
                                         ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD LEVEL.

               POLICY 17A          DISCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE TOP OF THE RIVERBANK, ON THE
                                   STEEP SLOPES WITHIN THE GORGE ADJACE)ff TO THE GENESEE RIVER,
                                   WITHIN DESIGNATED COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS, OR IN MY
                                   OTHER AREAS EXPERIENCING OR SUSCEPTIBLE TO EROSION.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               This LWRP policy promotes the use of non-structural techniques and/or management
               measures to prevent damage to natural resources and property from flooding and
               erosion.    The policy suggests that such measures as structure siting,
               floodproofing and elevation of buildings, the reshaping and vegetation of slopes,
               the provision of drainage systems to reduce run-off that may weaken slopes, and
               the retention of existing vegetation should be incorporated into the early
               planning and review of any project. Such measures over other ustructuralm and
               more complicated techniques are to be encouraged, and the existing site plan and
               environmental review processes are the best means of doing this.

               This policy recognizes both the potential adverse impacts of flooding and erosion
               upon development and upon natural protective features in the coastal area as well
               as the costs of protection against those hazards which structural measures
               entail.

               Non-structural measures shall include, but not be limited to, the following
               measures:



                                                     111-24









               (1)     Within identified coastal erosion hazard areas:

                       (a)    use of minimum setbacks;

                       (b)    strengthening of coastal landforms by such means as:

                              (1)   planting appropriate vegetation on dunes and bluffs;

                              (2)   reshaping bluffs to achieve an appropriate angle of repose
                                    so as to reduce the potential for slumping and to permit the
                                    planting of stabilizing vegetation; and

                              (3)   installing drainage systems on bluffs to reduce runoff and
                                    internal seepage of waters which erode or weaken the
                                    landforms.

               (2)     Within identified flood hazard areas:

                       (a)    avoidance of risk or damage from flooding by the siting of
                              buildings outside the hazard area; and

                       (b)    flood-proofing of buildings or their elevation above the base flood
                              level.

               This policy shall apply to the planning, siting and design of proposed activities
               and development, including measures to protect existing activities and
               devel opment. To ascertai n cons i stency wi th the pol i cy, i t must be determi ned i f
               any one, or a combination of non-structural measures would afford the degree of
               protection appropriate both to the character and purpose of the activity or
               development and to the hazard.       If non-structural measures are determined to
               offer sufficient protection, then consistency with the policy would require the
               use of such measures, when possible.

               In determining whether or not non-structural measures to protect against erosion
               or flooding will afford the degree of protection appropriate, an analysis, and,
               if necessary, other materials such as plans and sketches of the activity or
               development, the site and the alternative protection measures should be prepared
               to allow an assessment to be made.

               Much of the area within the LWRP boundary, that has been identified as being
               within the Genesee River or Lake Ontario floodplain or that contains steep slopes
               in excess of 15% and thus subject to serious erosion problems, is in public
               ownership and is zoned for open space use.          Development activities in these
               critical environmental areas are regulated by limiting the types of uses and
               activities permitted.      The extensive use of this regulation within the LWRP
               boundary helps assure that damage to natural resources and property resulting
               from flooding and erosion will be minimized.

               The standards and guidelines found in the city's environmental, special permit,
               and site plan review procedures will be applied in evaluating and promoting
               non-structural erosion and flood protection measures for development proposed
               within the LWRP boundary. Development proposed within areas zoned as open space

                                                        111-25









               or within 100 feet of the lake or river are Type I actions under the City's
               Environmental Quality Review Ordinance. Such actions will require a complete
               environmental impact review in which the need for and use of non-structural means
               of erosion and flood protection proposed for the project will be evaluated. The
               special permit review process used to review and approve applications for
               development within designated floodplain areas should also be used to ensure that
               structures are floodproofed, located above the base flood elevation, or setback
               an appropriate distance from the floodplain boundary.      The site plan review
               process considers erosion, drainage, and flood control/protection measures and
               should also be used to promote planting of vegetation to control drainage and
               erosion problems.

               POLICY 18           TO SAFEGUARD THE VITAL ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL
                                   INTERESTS OF THE STATE AND OF ITS CITIZENS, PROPOSED MAJOR
                                   ACTIONS IN THE COASTAL AREA MUST GIVE FULL CONSIDERATION TO
                                   THOSE INTERESTS, AND TO THE SAFEGUARDS WHICH THE STATE HAS
                                   ESTABLISHED TO PROTECT VALUABLE COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS.



               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               Government agencies recognize that valuable coastal resource areas contained
               within the city's LWRP boundary should be developed and protected for all the
               citizens of the state.     Proposed major actions undertaken within the LWRP
               boundary are appropriate only if they do not significantly impair or diminish
               valuable coastal features and resources and do not conflict with the vital
               economic, social and environmental interests of the state and its citizens. All
               government agencies recognize and will continue to ensure that proposed major
               actions undertaken by the city, county, state or federal government that would
               affect natural resources, water levels and flows, hydroelectric power generation,
               shoreline damage or recreational facilities, take into account the social,
               economic and environmental interests of the state and all its citizens.

               POLICY 19           PROTECT, MAINTAIN AND INCREASE THE LEVELS AND TYPES OF ACCESS
                                   TO PUBLIC WATER-RELATED RECREATION RESOURCES AND FACILITIES
                                   SO THAT THESE RESOURCES AND FACILITIES MAY BE FULLY UTILIZED
                                   BY ALL THE PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH REASONABLY ANTICIPATED
                                   PUBLIC RECREATION NEEDS AND THE PROTECTION OF HISTORIC AND
                                   NATURAL RESOURCES. IN PROVIDING SUCH ACCESS, PRIORITY SHALL
                                   BE GIVEN TO PUBLIC BEACHES, BOATING FACILITIES, FISHING AREAS
                                   AND WATERFRONT PARKS.

               POLICY 19A          MAINTAIN, FACILITATE OR IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCESS TO WATERFRONT
                                   RECREATIONAL RESOURCES AND FACILITIES THROUGH EXISTING PUBLIC
                                   PARKS ALONG THE GENESEE RIVER AND LAKE ONTARIO.

               POLICY 19B          PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT OF AN IMPROVED PUBLIC
                                   TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO AND THROUGH DURAND EASTMAN PARK.

               POLICY 19C          DEVELOP, IN CONJUNCTION WITH MONROE COUNTY, A PUBLIC BOAT
                                   LAUNCH FACILITY ALONG THE EAST BANK OF THE GENESEE RIVER,
                                   IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH OF THE STUTSON STREET BRIDGE.


                                                     111-26






   0          POLICY 19D          PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE INCREASED PUBLIC ACCESS FOR FISHING
                                  THROUGH THE CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF THE EAST AND WEST PIERS
                                  ON LAKE ONTARIO, AT THE MOUTH OF THE GENESEE RIVER.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              Government agencies recognize the need to increase public access to waterfront
              resources and facilities while considering the impacts of such access and
              ensuring the protection of sensitive environmental features, historic areas, and
              fragile fish and wildlife habitats. Priority will be given to improving physical
              access to existing coastal recreational sites as well as those under development
              and to improving the ability of residents to get to those areas via the public
              transportation system.

              Improved public access to the shore zone and to recreational resources and
              facilities that are part of the six public parks located within the LWRP boundary
              will be promoted and, possibly, further developed.

              The development of a public transportation system to Durand-Eastman Park, in
              cooperation with the Rochester/Genessee Regional Transportation Authority, will
              be investigated.    Government agencies will encourage the establishment of a
              special bus route to and through the park, particularly during periods of peak
              park use.

              The development of a public boat launch facility along the eastern bank of the
              river, just south of the Stutson Street Bridge, will be promoted and encouraged.
              The facility will be developed in conjunction with Monroe County and will help
              redevelop and revitalize a severely underutilized area of riverfront. The boat
              launch will provide increased public access to the river for boating, sailing and
              fishing.

              The following guidelines will be used in determining the consistency of a
              proposed action with this policy:

                (1)   The existing access from adjacent or proximate public lands or facilities
                      to public water-related recreation resources and facilities shall not be
                      reduced, nor shall the possibility of increasing access in the future
                      from adjacent or proximate public lands or facilities to public
                      water-related recreational resources and facilities be eliminated, unless
                      in the latter case, estimates of future use of these resources and
                      facilities are too low to justify maintaining or providing increased
                      public access or unless such actions are found to be necessary or
                      beneficial by the public body having jurisdiction over such access as the
                      result of a reasonable justification of the need to meet systematic
                      objectives.

                (2)   Proposed projects to increase public access to public water-related
                      recreation resources and facilities shall be analyzed according to the
                      following factors:





                                                    111-27










                      (a)   The level of access to be provided should be in accordance with
                            estimated public use. If not, the proposed level of access to be
                            provided shall be deemed inconsistent with this policy.

                      (b)   The level of access to be provided shall not cause a degree of use
                            which would exceed the physical capacity of the resource or
                            facility.    If this were determined to be the case, then the
                            proposed level of access shall be deemed inconsistent with this
                            policy.

                (3)   The state will not undertake or fund any project which increases access
                      to a water-related resource or facility that is not open to all members
                      of the public.

               POLICY 20           ACCESS TO THE PUBLICLY OWNED FORESHORE AND TO LANDS
                                   IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE FORESHORE OR THE WATER'S EDGE
                                   THAT ARE PUBLICLY OWNED SHALL BE PROVIDED, AND IT SHOULD BE
                                   PROVIDED IN A MANNER COMPATIBLE WITH ADJOINING USES. SUCH
                                   LANDS SHALL BE RETAINED IN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP.



               POLICY 20A          PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF
                                   DEVELOPMENT OF WATER-ORIENTED MIXED-USE FACILITIES AT THE
                                   PORT AUTHORITY SITE.


               POLICY 20B          INCREASE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT AND TO RECREATIONAL
                                   RESOURCES AND FACILITIES AT THE RIVER STREET SITE THROUGH
                                   IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER-ORIENTED, NIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
                                   PROJECTS.



               POLICY 20C          DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM THAT WILL
                                   PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE RIVER, ALONG PROPERTY LOCATED
                                   ON THE EAST AND WEST BANKS OF THE RIVER, SOUTH OF THE STUTSON
                                   STREET BRIDGE, IN THE VICINITY OF TURNING POINT PARK.


               POLICY 200          INCREASE ACCESS TO THE GENESEE RIVER GORGE AREA THROUGH THE
                                   DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM OF FORMAL RIVER OVERLOOKS, HIKING AND
                                   BIKING TRAILS, AND PEDESTRIAN PATHS.


               POLICY 20E          NEGOTIATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE RIVERFRONT
                                   THROUGH PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE FEASIBLE.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               Government agencies will provide access to publicly owned areas of the shore zone
               -where the provision of such access is feasible and would require only minimal
               facilities and where it will not endanger sensitive environmental features
               historic areas, and fish and wildlife habitats or be incompatible with adjaceni

                                                     111-28









              land uses. Guidelines I through 3 under Policy 19 will be used in determining
              the consistency of a proposed government action or private development with this
              policy.

              As part of the development of a mixed-use, water-oriented facility at the Port
              Authority and River Street sites, government agencies will ensure that public
              access to the waterfront is maintained and enhanced. Agencies will ensure that
              the provision of this access will be compatible with adjacent land and water uses
              proposed for the sites. This access will take the form of a major riverfront
              promenade or pedestrian trail, marinas, boat docks, riverfront restaurants and
              a riverfront park that are coordinated with other development proposed for the
              area. Continued maintenance of the east and west piers and facilities within
              Ontario Beach Park is also included in the plans.

              Public access to and through the river gorge is, in most places, dangerous, not
              well defined and of limited use. Existing trails are difficult to follow and not
              always walkable. With the exception of the existing county boat launch at the
              Port Authority site, and the existing canoe launch in Turning Point Park, very
              little formal, guaranteed public access is available.

              Projects which increase public access to the gorge should be encouraged where
              feasible. A pedestrian trail system could be developed within the gorge, that
              would link major waterfront resources and facilities. While much of the land
              within the river gorge is publicly owned, most of the areas that offer the best
              access to the river shoreline are in private ownership.      Government agencies
              will, therefore, continue to investigate and promote the establishment of public
              access to recreational facilities through private development, where feasible.
              The development of this access would be completed in a manner which ensures
              preservation of sensitive environmental features and wildlife habitats and does
              not exceed the carrying capacity of the area.

              It is important to remember that traditional sales of easements on lands
              underwater to adjacent onshore property owners are consistent with this policy,
              provided such easements do not substantially interfere with continued public use
              of the public lands on which the easement is granted.        Public use of such
              publicly-owned underwater lands and lands immediately adjacent to the shore shall
              be discouraged where such use would be inappropriate for reasons of public
              safety, military security, or the protection of fragile coastal resources.

              POLICY 21           VATER DEPENDENT AND WATER ENHANCED RECREATION SHALL BE
                                  ENCOURAGED AND FACILITATED AND SHALL BE GIVEN PRIORITY OVER
                                  NON-MATER- RELATED USES ALONG THE COAST, PROVIDED IT IS
                                  CONSISTENT VITH THE PRESERVATION AND EMMEMENT OF OTHER
                                  COASTAL RESOURCES AND TAKES INTO ACCOUNT DEKAND FOR SUCH
                                  FACILITIES. IN FACILITATING SUCH ACTIVITIES, PRIORITY SHALL
                                  BE GIVEN TO AREAS WHERE ACCESS TO THE RECREATION
                                  OPPORTUNITIES OF THE COAST CAN BE PROVIDED BY NEW OR EXISTING
                                  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND TO THOSE AREAS WHERE THE
                                  USE OF THE SHORE IS SEVERELY RESTRICTED BY EXISTING
                                  DEVELOPMENT.




                                                    111-29









               POLICY 21A         FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OFMARIMAS, BOAT DOCKS APO LAUNCHING
                                  RAMPS, FISHING ACCESS AND OTHER WATER-DEPENDENT AND
                                  WATER-ENHANCED RECREATIONAL USES IN RIVER-HARBOR ZONING
                                  DISTRICTS, PARTICULARLY AT THE PORT AUTHORITY SITE AM THE
                                  RIVER STREET SITE.



               POLICY 21B         DEVELOP NEW AND EXPANDED WATER-DEPENDENT OR WATE]t-ENHANCED
                                  RECREATIONAL USES AT TURNING POINT PARK.


               POLICY 21C         PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT, RECONSTRUCTION OR
                                  REHABILITATION    OF  WATER-DEPENDENT    AND    WATER-ENHANCED
                                  RECREATIONAL USES AT ONTARIO BEACH PARK, DURAND-EASTMAN PARK,
                                  SENECA PARK, AND MAPLEWOOD PARK.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

               The development of water-dependent and water-enhanced recreational uses in
               appropriate locations along the lake and river is the main focus of the city's
               LWRP. Because of the limited availability of.coastal lands and resources in the
               region, government agencies recognize the need to give priority to development
               of recreational uses within the shore zone which are water -dependent, are
               enhanced by a coastal location and which increase public access to the
               waterfront.

               Water-related recreation includes such things as boating and fishing facilities
               pedestrian and bicycle trails, picnic areas, scenic overlooks and passiv
               recreational areas that take advantage of coastal scenery. These water-dependent
               uses should be promoted and encouraged within both public and private development
               projects. In each case, government agencies will ensure that such development
               only occurs where water-related recreational uses are consistent with the
               preservation and enhancement of important coastal resources and within the
               carrying capacity of the resource to accommodate the particular activity or use.
               Boating facilities should, where appropriate, include parking, park-like
               surroundings, and restroom and pump-out facilities.

               Redevelopment plans for the port site and River Street area, which encourage
               development of water-dependent and water-related recreational facilities, have
               been prepared and will be promoted. Priority to such uses will be given within
               the context of any development plan which is finally implemented for these areas.

               Government agencies recognize the unique opportunities that exist within the six
               public parks located along the lake and the river to promote and provide
               water-oriented recreational uses as well as public access to the shore zone.
               Development of water-oriented recreational facilities that are part of these
               parks will be promoted, encouraged and supported.         Public access to the
               waterfront will be improved, and appropriate water-oriented recreational uses
               will be located in the waterfront areas in each park. These uses could include
               pedestrian trails, fishing access, boat docking facilities, boat launching ramps
               and cartop boat launch facilities, and swimming.


                                                    111-30









              Opportunities for "linkage" of areas along the lake and river through development
              of linear pedestrian trails will be investigated. Such opportunities exist along
              the east and west banks of the river gorge, near Turning Point Park. The siting
              or design of new public or private development which would result in a barrier
              to the recreational use of the shore zone or which would damage sensitive
              environmental areas or conflict with anticipated public demand for such
              developmentwill bediscouraged. Public transportation service towater-oriented
              recreational facilities will be a major priority.

              Information  regarding estimated demand for water-dependent and water-enhanced
              recreational uses such as boat slips, launching facilities, etc. is provided in
              Section 11, Inventory and Analysis. This information can provide the basis for
              determining the need for and potential locations of water-related recreational
              facilities.    Higher priority should be given to locating and developing
              water-dependent recreational development over those which are only enhanced by
              or do not require a coastal location.

              POLICY 22           DEVELOPMENT, WHEN LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SHORE, SHALL
                                  PROVIDE FOR WATER-RELATEO RECREATION, AS A MULTIPLE USE,
                                  WHENEVER SUCH RECREATIONAL USE IS APPROPRIATE IN LIGHT OF
                                  REASONABLY ANTICIPATED DEMAND FOR SUCH ACTIVITIES AND THE
                                  PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.


              POLICY 22A          FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIX OF WATER-RELATEO RECREATIONAL
                                  USES AT THE PORT AUTHORITY SITE AND RIVER STREET SITE.


              POLICY 22B          NEGOTIATE, WHERE FEASIBLE. WITH VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
                                  TO DEVELOP OR IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT AND TO
                                  PROVIDE CERTAIN TYPES OF PASSIVE RECREATIONAL USES WITHIN THE
                                  SHORE ZONE.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              There are several areas within the city's LWRP boundary that could accommodate
              water-related recreational uses, in conjunction with mixed-use or multiple-use
              facilities.    Most of these areas are underutilized sites that should be
              encouraged to develop as mixed-use facilities which include water-oriented
              recreation.   Government agencies recognize the following types of development
              which can generally provide water-related recreation as a multiple-use:

                (a)   Parks
                (b)   Highways
                (c)   Power plants-
                (d)   Sewage treatment facilities
                (e)   Mental health facilities
                (f)   Hospitals
                (g)   Schools and universities
                (h)   Nature preserves
                (i)   Large residential subdivisions containing 50 units or more
                (j)   Shopping centers

                                                    111-31









                (k)   Office buildings

               Whenever development proposals involve shore zone areas or areas adjacent to the
               shore, government agencies will evaluate whether or not they should be considered
               for or required to incorporate recreational uses within them.          Whenever a
               proposed development is consistent with other LWRP policies and would, through
               the provision of water-oriented recreation and other multiple-uses, significantly
               increase public use and enjoyment of the shore zone, government agencies will
               encourage such development to locate adjacent to the shore. In general, some
               form of recreational use should be accommodated, unless there are compelling
               reasons why such recreation would not be compatible with the development, or a
               reasonable demand for public use cannot be foreseen.
               Appropriate recreation uses which do not require any substantial additional
               construction shall be provided at the expense of the project sponsor provided the
               cost does not exceed 2% of the total project cost.

               In determining whether compelling reasons exist which would make recreation
               inadvisable as a multiple use, safety considerations should reflect a recognition
               that some risk is acceptable in the use of recreational facilities.
               There are several opportunities for development of water-related recreational
               uses and improvement of public access to the shore zone that are located within
               existing industrial facilities. An example of such an opportunity would be the
               improvement of public vehicular and pedestrian access, down Seth Green Drive, to
               the RG&E Station 5 Power Plant on the west bank of the river, just north of the
               Driving Park Bridge. Improvement of public access in this location would greatly
               enhance the area's use by fishermen.     Development of a fish-cleaning station
               could also be considered.

               There are several other areas within the LWRP boundary that provide significant
               vistas of the river gorge.       These areas are also within privately-owned
               industrial facilities.     Negotiating public access and development of such
               facilities as overlooks and rest areas within these areas is considered to be a
               major priority with the city.

               POLICY 23           PROTECT, ENHANCE AND RESTORE STRUCTURES, DISTRICTS, AREAS OR
                                   SITES THAT ARE OF SIGNIFICANCE IN THE HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE,
                                   ARCHEOLOGY OR CULTURE OF THE STATE, ITS COMMUNITIES OR THE
                                   NATION.


               POLICY 23A          IDENT IFY, PROTECT AND RESTORE SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC STRUCTURES
                                   LOCATED WITHIN THE LWRP BOUNDARY, TO INCLUDE THE GENESEE
                                   LIGHTHOUSE AND OTHER BUILDINGS WHICH MAY BE OF NATIONAL OR
                                   LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE.


               POLICY 23B          REDEVELOP THE PORT AUTHORITY SITE AND THE RIVER STREET SITE
                                   IN A MANNER WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH AND COMPLEMENTS THE
                                   ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY OF EXISTING STRUCTURES
                                   IN THE AREA.

                                                     111-32











              POLICY 23C          IDENTIFY AND PROTECT ARCHAEOLOGIC    ALLY AND HISTORICALLY
                                  SIGNIFICANT SITES LOCATED WITHIN THE LWRP BOUNDARY, THROUGH
                                  THE DEVELOPMENT OF VARIOUS MASTER PLANS AND DESIGNS FOR THE
                                  SIX PUBLIC PARKS LOCATED ALONG THE LAKE AND RIVER.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              Government agencies recognize the need for and place a high priority on the
              identification and preservation of structures, sites and districts within the
              LWRP boundary that are significant in terms of the history, architecture,
              archaeology or culture of the state or the nation. Extensive historic surveys
              have been conducted of the LWRP study area by the Landmark Society of Western New
              York and the Rochester Museum and Science Center. The surveys have identified
              and located structures which are listed on the National Register of Historic
              Places, which are potential nominations to the national register, or which may
              have local historic significance and should be classified as local landmarks.
              After completion of these surveys, the city will prepare a list of LWRP
              structures to be nominated to the National Historic Register, will identify
              structures to be designated as local landmarks, will evaluate the possibility of
              extending or creating new preservation districts, and will identify sites that
              should be preserved as a part of redevelopment plans for public parks.

              Structures, facilities, sites or other areas within the LWRP boundary that have
              already been identified as being locally or nationally significant in terms of
              their architecture or history include:

               (a)   The Genesee Lighthouse (National Register Listing)
               (b)   The Ontario Beach Park Carousel
               (c)   St. Bernard's Seminary
               (d)   Eastman Kodak Hawkeye Plant
               (e)   RG&E Station 5 Power Plant and Middle Falls Dam
               M     Railway Station on River Street
               (g)   Carthage Landing
               (h)   Kelsey's Landing and Glenn House
               (i)   Seneca Park
               (j)   Rochester School For The Deaf
               (k)   An area on the east and west river banks, between the Middle and Lower
                     Falls, that contains archaeological ly significant sites and remains of
                     historic mill races.

              Redevelopment plans proposed for the Port Authority site and the River Street
              site will consider architecturally and historically significant structures and
              facilities in the area and will be designed to protect and enhance these
              resources. A major element of the River Street concept plan is the enhancement
              of the area's existing uneighborhoodu and unauticalO character and ambience. New
              development will be compatible with existing architecturally and historically
              significant buildings in terms of appearance, design and construction.

              Government agencies also consider the preservation of several archaeologically
              significant sites located within public parks and other areas along the river
              gorge to be a major priority. These sites include Carthage Landing, located on

                                                    111-33










               the east bank of the Genesee River, just south of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge
               Kelsey's Landing, located on the west bank of the river, below Maplewood Park:
               and an area near the proposed Lower Falls Park, just south of the Driving Park
               Bridge. These areas contain historic remains of buildings and other facilities
               that date back to the early 18001s.      The identification, classification and
               protection of these areas through park redevelopment plans will be promoted and
               encouraged.

               Developers in areas which have been identified within the river gorge as
               significant archeological sites shall contact the New York State Office of Parks,
               Recreation and Historic Preservation to determine appropriate protective
               construction measures. All practicable means to protect structures, districts,
               areas or sites that are of significance in the history, architecture, archeology
               or culture of the state or nation shall include any techniques, measures, or
               controls required to prevent a significant adverse change to such structures,
               districts, areas or sites.

               This policy should not be construed to prevent the construction, reconstruction,
               alteration, or demolition of any building, structure, earthwork, or component
               thereof of a recognized historic, cultural or archeological resource which has
               been officially certified as being imminently dangerous to the public health,
               safety or welfare.

               POLICY 24            PREVENT IMPAIRMENT OF SCENIC RESOURCES OF STATEWIDE
                                    SIGNIFICANCE, AS IDENTIFIED ON THE COASTAL AREA NAP.
                                    IMPAIRMENT SHALL INCLUDE:

                                    (1)   THE IRREVERSIBLE MODIFICATION OF GEOLOGICAL FORKS, THE
                                          DESTRUCTION OR REMOVAL OF VEGETATION, THE DESTRUCTION
                                          OR REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES, WHEREVER THE GEOLOGIC FORKS,
                                          VEGETATION OR STRUCTURES ARE SIGNIFICANT TO THE SCENIC
                                          QUALITY OF AN IDENTIFIED RESOURCE; AND

                                    (2)   THE ADDITION OF STRUCTURES WHICH BECAUSE OF SITING OR
                                          SCALE WILL REDUCE IDENTIFIED VIEWS OR WHICH BECAUSE OF
                                          SCALE, FORM, OR MATERIALS WILL DIMINISH THE SCENIC
                                          QUALITY OF AN IDENTIFIED RESOURCE.

               EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

               This policy is not applicable to the City's LWRP because there are no scenic
               resources of state-wide significance within Rochester's LWRP boundary.

               POLICY 25            PROTECT, RESTORE AND ENHANCE NATURAL AND KAN-NADE RESOURCES
                                    WHICH ARE NOT IDENT IFIED AS BEING OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE,
                                    BUT WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE SCENIC QUALITY OF THE COASTAL
                                    AREA.







                                                      111-34










             POLICY 25A          PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE AESTHETIC QUALITY OF THE GENESEE
                                 RIVER SORGE, AS A NATURAL RESOURCE OF LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE,
                                 THROUGH GENERAL CLEAN-UP OF THE RIVER BANKS AND RENOVAL OF
                                 DEBRIS.


             POLICY 25B          PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE LOWER AND NIDDLE FALLS AREA AS VELL
                                 AS VISTAS OF THE FALLS FRON ADJACENT LANDS.


             POLICY 25C          ENHANCE SCENIC VIEWS AND VISTAS WITHIN THE GENESEE RIVER
                                 GORGE AND ALONG LAKE ONTARIO, THROUGH THE DEVELOPNENT OF
                                 SCENIC OVERLOOKS, VIEWING AREAS, AND PEDESTRIAN TRAILS, AND
                                 THROUGH THE PRESERVATION OF THE NATURAL AESTHETIC QUALITIES
                                 OF THESE AREAS.



             EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

             Government agencies recognize the importance of restoring and preserving natural
             and man-made resources within the LWRP boundary that contribute to the scenic
             quality of the river and lake. Activities which could degrade scenic qualities
             of these areas include modification of natural features and the removal of
             vegetation.

             The standards and guidelines associated with the city's site plan review, Overlay
             Harbor Town Design District and environmental review procedures will be used to
             ensure that proposed private development does not interfere with, but rather
             enhances, existing natural or man-made resources that contribute to the scenic
             quality of the lake and river.

             Much of the area within the river gorge contains steep slopes in excess of 15%,
             is in public ownership and is zoned for open space uses. The city's Open Space
             Zoning District limits and regulates development activities in this critical
             environmental area. Lands zoned for open space within the LWRP boundary will
             remain in their natural state and will contribute to enhancement and preservation
             of the scenic qualities of the gorge.
             Maintenance plans and measures to clean-up the riverfront area and steep slopes
             within the gorge, in order to enhance their visual qualities, will be promoted
             and encouraged. The development of trails, overlooks and viewing areas, in and
             around the public parks located on the river, will be promoted and encouraged in
             order to provide increased viewing opportunities of the gorge area for park
             visitors.

             The following siting and facility-related guidelines are to be used to achieve
             this policy, recognizing that each development situation is unique and that the
             guidelines will have to be applied accordingly. Guidelines include:
               (1)   Siting structures and other development such as highways, power lines and
                     signs back from shorelines or in other inconspicuous locations to


                                                   111-35









                      maintain the attractive quality of the shoreline and to retain views to
                      and from the shore;

                (2)   Clustering or orienting structures to retain views, save open space and
                      provide visual organization within a development;

                (3)   Incorporating sound, existing structures (especially historic buildings)
                      into the overall development scheme;

                (4)   Removing deteriorated or degraded elements;

                (5)   Maintaining or restoring the original land form, except when changes
                      screen unattractive elements or add appropriate interest;

                (6)   Maintaining or adding vegetation to provide interest, encourage the
                      presence of wildlife, blend structures into the site, and obscure
                      unattractive elements, except when selective clearing removes unsightly,
                      diseased or hazardous vegetation and when selective clearing creates
                      views of coastal areas;

                (7)   Using appropriate materials, in addition to vegetation, to screen
                      unattractive elements; and

                (8)   Using appropriate scales, forms and materials to ensure that buildings
                      and other   structures are compatible with and add interest to the
                      landscape.

               POLICY 26           TO CONSERVE AND PROTECT AGRICULTURAL LANDS IN THE STATE'S
                                   COASTAL AREA, AN ACTION SHALL NOT RESULT IN A LOSS, NOR
                                   IMPAIR THE PRODUCTIVITY OF IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL LANDS, AS
                                   IDENTIFIED ON THE COASTAL AREA NAP, IF THAT LOSS OR
                                   IMPAIRMENT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE VIABILITY OF
                                   AGRICULTURE IN AN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT OR IF THERE 15 NO
                                   AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, IN THE AREA SURROUNDING SUCH LANDS.


               EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

               This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP because there are no
               agriculturally zoned lands within Rochester's LWRP boundary.

               POLICY 27           DECISIONS ON THE SITING AND CONSTRUCTION OF MAJOR ENERGY
                                   FACILITIES IN THE COASTAL AREA WILL BE BASED ON PUBLIC ENERGY
                                   NEEDS, COMPATIBILITY OF SUCH FACILITIES WITH THE ENVIRONMENT.
                                   AND THE FACILITY'S NEED FOR A SHOREFRONT LOCATION.


               POLICY 27A          EVALUATE EXISTING ENERGY FACILITY SITES FOR OTHER USES, IF
                                   AND WHEN SUCH SITES ARE ABANDONED, IN CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC
                                   ENERGY NEEDS, THE SITE'S COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES,
                                   AND THE NEED FOR A SHOREFRONT LOCATION.



                                                    111-36











              EXPLANATION OF POLICIES

              Demand for energy in New York will increase, although at a rate slower than
              previously predicted. The state expects to meet these energy demands through a
              combination of conservation measures, traditional and alternative technologies,
              and use of various fuels, including coal, in greater proportion.
              A determination of public need for energy is the first step in the process for
              siting new facilities. The directives for determining this need are set forth
              in the New York State Energy Law. With respect to transmission lines, Article
              VII of the State's Public Service Law requires additional forecasts and
              establishes the basis for determining the compatibility of these facilities with
              the environment and the necessity for a shorefront location. With respect to
              electric generating facilities, environmental impacts associated with siting and
              construction will be considered by one or more State agencies or, if in
              existence, an energy siting board. The policies derived from these proceedings
              are entirely consistent with the general coastal     policies derived from other
              laws, particularly the regulations promulgated pursuant to the Waterfront
              Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act. The Act is used for
              the purposes of ensuring consistency with the State Coastal Management Program
              and this Local Waterfront Revitalization Program.

              in consultation with the city, the HYSDOS will comment on State Energy Office
              policies and planning reports as may exist; present testimony for the record
              during relevant proceedings under State law; and use the SEQR law and NYSDOS
              regulations to ensure that decisions on other proposed energy facilities (other
              than those certified under the Public Service Law) which would impact the
              waterfront area are made consistent with the policies and purposes of this LWRP.
              The only major energy facility site that currently exists within the LWRP
              boundary is the RG&E Station 5 Power Plant and the adjacent Middle Falls Dam.
              Although it is anticipated that this facility and use will continue at its
              present location for the foreseeable future, if RUE ever does abandon the site,
              an evaluation of the best reuse for the site will be made which acknowledges the
              need for compatibility with the surrounding environment and the need for a
              shorefront location.

              POLICY 28           ICE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL NOT DAMAGE SIGNIFICANT FISH
                                  AND WILDLIFE AND THEIR HABITATS, INCREASE SHORELINE EROSION
                                  OR   FLOODING, OR INTERFERE WITH THE PRODUCTION OF
                                  HYDROELECTRIC POWER.



              EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

              This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP because ice management practices
              are not currently undertaken within Rochester's LWRP boundary.        Should such
              practices be undertaken in the future in order to maintain navigation, an
              assessment shall be made of their impacts upon fish and wildlife habitats, flood
              levels and damage, rates of shoreline erosion damage, and upon natural protective
              features.   Following such an examination, adequate methods of avoidance or


                                                    111-37









              mitigation of such potential effects must be utilized if the proposed action is
              to be implemented.

              POLICY 29            ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY RESOURCES ON THE OUTER
                                   CONTINENTAL SHELF, IN LAKE ERIE AND IN OTHER WATER BODIES,
                                   AND ENSURE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY OF SUCH ACTIVITIES.


              EXPLANATION OF WHY   POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

              This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP.         Activities existing or
              contemplated within the city's LWRP boundary or within the metropolitan region
              will have no known impact on any energy resources which have been or may be
              identified on the lake or river.

              POLICY 30            MUNICIPAL,   INDUSTRIAL,   AND COMMERCIAL      DISCHARGE OF
                                   POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS
                                   SUBSTANCES, INTO COASTAL WATERS WILL CONFORM TO STATE AND
                                   NATIONAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.


              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Municipal, industrial and commercial discharges include mend-of-pipeu discharges
              into surface and groundwater as well as plant site runoff, leaching, spillages,
              sludge and other waste disposal, and drainage from raw materials storage sites
              Regulated industrial discharges include those that directly empty into receivin;
              coastal waters and those which pass through municipal treatment systems before
              reaching the State's waterways.

              The Monroe County Health Department currently monitors the water quality of
              discharges of less than 1,000 gallons per day into the river and lake.          The
              NYSDEC currently monitors discharges of more than 1,000 gallons per day into the
              river and lake. These monitoring activities will be supported and encouraged to
              ensure that discharges into the lake and river comply with State and federal
              water quality standards.

              The entire shoreline of Lake Ontario as well as the Genesee River is considered
              to be a critical environmental area under the city's existing site plan and
              environmental review procedures. Because of this, the impacts on water quality
              of stormwater runoff and/or effluent discharge from development sites is
              evaluated and mitigating measures can be required if adverse environmental
              impacts such as serious degradation of water quality should occur.

              POLICY 31            STATE COASTAL AREA POLICIES AND PURPOSES OF APPROVED LOCAL
                                   WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAMS WILL BE CONSIDERED WHILE
                                   REVIEWING COASTAL WATER CLASSIFICATIONS AND WHILE MODIFYING
                                   WATER QUALITY STANDARDS; HOWEVER, THOSE WATERS ALREADY
                                   OVERBURDENED WITH CONTAMINANTS WILL BE RECOGNIZED AS BEING
                                   A DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINT.




                                                    111-38











               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               Pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217), New York State has
               classified its coastal and other waters in accordance with the consideration of
               best usage i n the i nterest of the publ i c, and has adopted water qual i ty standards
               for each class of waters. These classifications and standards are reviewable at
               least every three years for possible revision or amendment, and will be reviewed
               by the State in light of the adopted LWRP.

               The Genesee River has been classified as having uBN water quality. No bodies of
               water within the city's LWRP boundary are currently classified as ulimiting
               segmentsu.

               As noted in POLICY 30, the shorelines of the lake and river are considered to be
               critical environmental areas under the city's site plan and environmental review
               procedures. Because of this, the impacts on water quality of stormwater runoff
               and/or effluent discharge from development sites is evaluated and mitigating
               measures can be required if adverse environmental impacts such as the serious
               degradation of water quality should occur.        Government agencies consider the
               achievement and maintenance of a water quality level in the Genesee River and
               Lake Ontario, which enables the widest possible recreational use while protecting
               important wildlife habitats, to be a major priority. The intent of the city's
               LWRP is to maintain the water quality of the lake and river by controlling
               stormwater runoff and effluent discharge from development sites as well as from
               vessels.

               POLICY 32            ENCOURAGE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE OR INNOVATIVE SANITARY WASTE
                                    SYSTEMS IN SMALL COMMUNITIES WHERE THE COSTS OF CONVENT IONAL
                                    FACILITIES ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE
                                    EXISTING TAX BASE OF THESE COMMUNITIES.



               EXPLANATION OF WHY POLICY IS NOT APPLICABLE

               This policy is not applicable to the city's LWRP because innovative sanitary
               waste systems are not considered to be economically feasible or desirable, from
               an engineering standpoint, within the LWRP boundary. Proposed development will
               be required to be placed on existing public sanitary waste systems or be required
               to provide for extensions of existing systems in order to service the development
               site.

               POLICY 33            BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WILL BE USED TO ENSURE THE C09MOL
                                    OF STORKWATER RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS DRAINING
                                    INTO COASTAL WATERS.



               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               The city and Monroe County are participating in a Combined Sewer Overflow
               Abatement Program (CSOAP) which will eliminate combined storm and sanitary sewers
               in many areas of the city. This project involves the construction of several
               large underground holding tunnels which will discharge sewage and storm water,

                                                       111-39










                collected after major rainfalls, to the Frank E. VanLare Treatment Plant located
                in Durand-Eastman Park.    Prior to the construction of these tunnels, large
                volumes of combined sewage and storm water that occurred after major rainfalls
                in the area flowed directly into the river and lake without being treated. This
                sewage contributed to pollution problems in the river and lake and the
                destruction of fish and other wildlife species.         The completion of the
                underground holding tunnels will eliminate a major source of pollution discharge
                into the river and lake and will help preserve existing stocks of fish in the
                area. Government agencies will continue to investigate and promote improvements
                to other portions of the city storm and sanitary sewer systems in order to
                maintain and enhance the existing water quality in the river and lake.        The
                improvements will be based on accepted best management practices (BMP's) for
                stormwater runoff and drainage control.

                As noted in POLICY 30, the shorelines of the lake and river are considered to be
                critical environmental areas under the city's site plan and environmental review
                procedures. Because of this, the impacts on water quality of stormwater runoff
                and effluent discharge from development sites is evaluated and mitigating
                measures can be required if adverse environmental impacts such as the serious
                degradation of water quality should occur.     Government agencies consider the
                achievement and maintenance of a water quality level in the Genesee River and
                Lake Ontario, which enables the widest possible recreational use while protecting
                important wildlife habitats, to be a major priority.

                POLICY 34           DISCHARGE OF WASTE MATERIALS FROM VESSELS INTO COASTAL WATERS
                                    VILL BE LIMITED SO AS TO PROTECT SIGNIFICANT FISH AND
                                    WILDLIFE HABITATS, RECREATIONAL AREAS AND WATER SUPPLY AREAS.

                EXPLANATION OF POLICY

                Government agencies will promote and encourage the control or prohibition of
                discharges of waste materials from vessels into coastal waters, in order to
                protect significant fish and wildlife habitats, recreational resources and water
                supply areas.   Counties in New York State may regulate such activity under
                Section 46 of New York State Navigation Law. The possibility of establishing
                no-discharge zones within the City's river and lake may be explored.            In
                addition, all relevant building, sanitary and health codes that apply to the
                discharge of sewage, waste and other pollutants in local waters will be enforced.
                The discharge of sewage, garbage, rubbish and other solid and liquid materials
                from watercraft and marinas into the State's waters is regulated. Priority will
                be given to the enforcement of this law in areas such as shellfish beds and other
                significant habitats, beaches and public water supply intakes, which need
                protection from contamination by vessel wastes.        Also, specific effluent
                standards for marine toilets have been promulgated by the U.S. Department of
                Transportation. To that end, the provision of adequate pump-out facilities for
                existing and proposed marina facilities will be required in the City of
                Rochester.

                POLICY 35           DREDGING AND DREDGE SPOIL DISPOSAL IN COASTAL WATERS WILL BE
                                    UNDERTAKEN IN A MANNER THAT MEETS EXISTING STATE DREDGING
                                    PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, AND PROTECTS SIGNIFICANT FISH AND

                                                     111-40









                                  WILDLIFE HABITATS, SCENIC RESOURCES, NATURAL PROTECTIVE
                                  FEATURES, IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL LANDS, AND WETLANDS.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Dredging is often essential for waterfront revitalization and development,
              maintenance of navigation channels at sufficient depths, pollutant removal as
              well as addressing other coastal management needs. Such dredging projects may,
              however, adversely affect water quality, fish and wildlife habitats, wetlands and
              other important coastal resources. Often these adverse effects can be minimized
              through careful design and timing of the dredging operation and proper siting of
              the dredge spoil disposal site.

              The NYSDEC will issue dredging permits if it has been demonstrated that the
              anticipated adverse effects of such operations have been reduced to levels which
              satisfy State dredging permit standards set forth in regulations developed
              pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law (Articles 15, 24, 25 and 34), and
              are consistent with policies pertaining to the protection of coastal resources.

              POLICY 36           ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE SHIPMENT AND STORAGE OF PETROLEUM
                                  AND OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN A KANNER
                                  THAT WILL PREVENT OR AT LEAST MINIMIZE SPILLS INTO COASTAL
                                  WATERS; ALL PRACTICABLE EFFORTS WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO
                                  EXPEDITE THE CLEANUP OF SUCH DISCHARGES; AND RESTITUTION FOR
                                  DAMAGES VILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THESE SPILLS OCCUR.


              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              See policy 39 for definition of hazardous materials.

              The following implement and address this policy:

               (a)   Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Compensation.
                     Navigation Law (Article 12)

               (b)   Penalties and Liabilities for Spills of Bulk Liquids.
                     Environmental Conservation Law (Article 71-1941)

               (c)   Transportation Law.
                     (Article 2, Section 14-F)

               These measures are adequate for the city because no activities related to the
               shipment or substantial storage of petroleum or other hazardous materials occur
               within the local waterfront revitalization boundary, or will occur within the
               boundary in the foreseeable future. All activities within the LWRP boundary
               which are subject to this policy shall also comply with state and federal
               regulations.






                                                   111-41










               POLICY 37           BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WILL BE UTILIZED TO MINIMIZE THE
                                   NONPOINT DISCHARGE OF EXCESS NUTRIENTS, ORGANICS AND ERODED
                                   SOILS INTO COASTAL WATERS.



               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               Government agencies recognize the need to control the nonpoint discharge of
               excess nutrients, organics and eroded soils into local coastal waters. However,
               a major portion of the area contained within the LWRP boundary is serviced by
               storm and sanitary sewers which do not outfall to the river or lake without
               adequate sewage treatment. Remaining areas of natural forest and woodland do not
               contribute significantly to nonpoint discharge of excess nutrients, organics or
               eroded soils into the river and lake.

               As noted in POLICY 30, the shorelines of the lake and river are considered to be
               critical environmental areas under the city's site plan and environmental review
               procedures. Because of this, the impacts on water quality of stormwater runoff,
               erosion, and/or effluent discharge from development sites is evaluated and
               mitigating measures can be required if adverse environmental impacts such as the
               serious degradation of water quality should result.         Soil erosion control
               practices and surface drainage control techniques will be evaluated or may be
               required based on accepted best management practices (BMP's), and as a result of
               the site plan and environmental review processes. Standards to be used in this
               evaluation are contained in Section 108 of the Administrative Procedures for the
               Issuance of Site Preparation Permits (see LWRP APPENDIX), and are based on two
               documents: Guidelines for Erosion and Sediment Control in Urban Areas of New York
               State, and Best Management Practices for Stormwater Runoff Management.

               Government agencies consider, as a major priority, the achievement and
               maintenance of a water quality level in the river and lake that enables the
               widest possible recreational use while protecting important wildlife habitats.

               POLICY 38           THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER
                                   SUPPLIES WILL BE CONSERVED AND PROTECTED, PARTICULARLY WHERE
                                   SUCH WATERS CONSTITUTE THE PRIMARY OR SOLE SOURCE OF WATER
                                   SUPPLY.


               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               The city consumes between 40 and 49 million gallons of water each day.           The
               city's primary source of water is through the Upland Watershed which includes
               Hemlock and Canadice Lakes in Ontario, Livingston and Steuben Counties. The city
               also gets some of its water supply from Lake Ontario through the Monroe County
               Water Authority (MCWA). The majority of the area within the city's LWRP boundary
               receives its water from Lake Ontario and the MCWA.

               The Upland Watershed encompasses approximately 66 square miles. Twenty-two
               percent of the watershed or 7,200 acres are directly controlled by the city,
               including the entire shoreline of both lakes.        Water quality problems have
               occurred within the watershed in recent years.          In order to help resolve
               controversy surrounding the use of the upl and I akes as a water supply, an Upl and

                                                      111-42









              Watershed Advisory Committee was formed by the city in. 1985. Six management
              objectives, developed by the committee, are used to ensure water quality in the
              Upland Watershed:

               (1)   Maintain city-owned property around the lakes as undeveloped;
               (2)   Enforce rules and regulations to protect the watershed from environmental
                     hazards;
               (3)   Maintain recreational activities around the lakes that are compatible
                     with conservation and water quality;
               (4)   Plan forest management to enhance forest quality and to control erosion;
               (5)   Manage water levels, wetlands, fish stocking and the use of local roads;
                     and
               (6)   Support an investment sufficient to practice good husbandry.

              In addition, a water filtration plant for the upland watershed will be
              constructed.

              The ci ty rel i es on the MCWA to moni tor and mai ntai n the qual i ty of water recei ved
              from Lake Ontario.  Standards to achieve this policy goal will be enforced.

              POLICY 39           THE TRANSPORT, STORAGE, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID
                                  WASTES, PARTICULARLY HAZARDOUS WASTES, WITHIN COASTAL AREAS
                                  WILL BE CONDUCTED IN SUCH A KAMMER SO AS TO PROTECT
                                  GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SUPPLIES, SIGNIFICANT FISH AND
                                  WILDLIFE HABITATS, RECREATION AREAS, IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL
                                  LAND AND SCENIC RESOURCES.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Solid wastes include sludges from air or water pollution control facilities,
              demolition and construction debris, and industrial and commercial wastes. Solid
              waste management facilities include resource recovery facilities, sanitary
              landfills, and solid waste reduction facilities. These definitions are based on
              the New York State Solid Waste Management Act (Environmental Conservation Law,
              Article 27).

              Hazardous wastes are unwanted by-products of manufacturing processes generally
              characterized as being flammable, corrosive, reactive, or toxic.              More
              specifically, hazardous waste is defined in the New York State Environmental
              Conservation Law (Section 27-0901 (3)) as uwaste or combination of wastes which
              .because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical or infectious
              characteristics, may: (1) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in
              mortality, or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating reversible
              illness; or (2) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health
              or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed or
              otherwise managed." A list of hazardous wastes has been adopted by the HYSOEC
              (6 NYCRR Part 371).

              There is currently no active transport, storage, treatment or disposal of
              hazardous wastes within the city's LWRP boundary. In addition, no activity is
              proposed or will occur within the waterfront revitalization area that will
              produce such hazardous or solid wastes, as defined in the Environmental

                                                   111-43










               Conservation Law, Article 27. Government standards regarding disposal of such
               wastes, when required, will be met.

               POLICY 40           EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FROM MAJOR STEAM ELECTRIC GENERATING AND
                                   INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES INTO COASTAL WATERS WILL NOT BE UNDULY
                                   INJURIOUS TO FISH AND WILDLIFE AND SHALL CONFORM TO STATE
                                   WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               A number of factors must be considered when reviewing a proposed site for
               facility construction. One of these factors is that the facility not discharge
               any effluent that will be unduly injurious to the propagation and protection of
               fish and wildlife, the industrial development of the state, the public health and
               public enjoyment of the receiving waters. The effects of thermal discharges on
               water quality and aquatic organisms will be considered by State agencies or, if
               applicable, a siting board when evaluating an applicant's request to construct
               a new electric generating facility.

               The RG&E Station 5 Power Plant located on the east bank of the river near the
               Driving Park Bridge, and the Eastman Kodak Company Industrial Waste Treatment
               Plant located on the west bank of the river, just north of the Veteran's Memorial
               Bridge, are the only facilities within the LWRP boundary that are the types of
               uses described in this policy. All activities within the city's waterfront which
               are subject to this policy shall comply with appropriate local, state and federal
               regulations to ensure that existing water quality standards are met and that
               appropriate disposal methods are used.

               POLICY 41           LAND USE OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL AREA VILL NOT CAUSE
                                   NATIONAL OR STATE AIR QUALITY STANDARDS TO BE VIOLATED.

               EXPLANATION OF POLICY

               The city's LWRP incorporates the air quality policies of and programs for the
               State prepared by the NYSDEC, pursuant to the Clean Air Act and State laws
               regulating air quality. The requirements of the Clean Air Act are the minimum
               air quality control standards applicable within the coastal area.

               Existing and proposed land uses within the city's LWRP boundary will be
               restricted to residential, recreational and marine-related and/or supporting
               commercial facilities.    None of these uses are likely to produce significant
               degradation of air quality in the area. The NYSDEC has jurisdiction over the
               monitoring of air quality to ensure that the provisions of the Federal Clean Air
               Act are being met. Monitoring activities will continue.

               POLICY 42           COASTAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILL BE CONSIDERED IF THE STATE
                                   RECLASSIFIES LAND AREAS PURSUANT TO THE OPREVENTION OF
                                   SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION REGULATIONSO OF THE FEDERAL CLEAN
                                   AIR ACT.





                                                     111-44











              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              The policies of the State Coastal Management Program and Rochester LWRP
              concerning proposed land and water uses and the protection and preservation of
              special management areas will be taken into account prior to any action to change
              prevention of significant deterioration land classifications in coastal regions
              or adjacent areas.    In addition, the NYSDOS will provide the NYSDEC with
              recommendations for proposed prevention of significant deterioration land
              classification designations, based upon State Coastal Management and Rochester
              LWRP policies.

              POLICY 43          LAND USE OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL AREA MUST NOT CAUSE
                                 THE GENERATION OF SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF ACID RAIN
                                 PRECURSORS: NITRATES AND SULFATES.



              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              The New York State Coastal Management Program incorporates the State's policies
              on acid rain.   Therefore, the Coastal Management Program will assist in the
              State's efforts to control acid rain. These efforts to control acid rain will
              enhance the continued viability of coastal fisheries, wildlife, agricultural,
              scenic and water resources.

              POLICY 44          PRESERVE AND PROTECT TIDAL AND FRESHWATER WET-LANDS AND
                                 PRESERVE THE BENEFITS DERIVED FROM THESE AREAS.

              EXPLANATION OF POLICY

              Government agencies recognize the need to preserve and protect freshwater
              wetlands located within the LWRP boundary and consider this to be a major
              priority within the context of other LWRP policies. For the purposes of this
              policy, freshwater wetlands include marshes, swamps, bogs and flats that support
              aquatic and semi-aquatic vegetation, as well as other wetlands as defined in the
              New York State Freshwater Wetlands Act and the New York State Protection of
              Waters Act. Government agencies recognize that the benefits derived from the
              protection of such wetland areas include maintenance of fish and wildlife
              habitats, control of erosion and drainage, protection of groundwater supplies,
              and provision of recreational opportunities.

              Over the past several years, many existing wetland areas within the LWRP boundary
              have been transferred to public ownership through historic donations, as well as
              through actual acquisition and purchase by the city. Additional purchases of
              wetland areas along the river are being investigated; these would, if completed,
              result in all such areas being in public ownership and controlled by the city or
              Monroe County, as well as the NYSDEC.

              The standards and guidelines contained in the city's environmental review
              procedures and regulations will be used to ensure that wetlands as well as
              surrounding areas are preserved and protected within the LWRP boundary.
              Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the river and lake and within
              areas zoned as open space, which include all significant wetland areas along the

                                                   111-45









               river and lake, are Type I actions under the city's Environmental Quality Review
               Ordinance, since these locations have been designated as critical environmental
               areas.   Actions in these areas will require a complete environmental impact
               review. As a part of this review, a project's potential impacts on existing fish
               and wildlife habitat areas and other wetland features would be determined and
               addressed and mitigating measures, if required, could be proposed in order to
               protect these areas from adverse development impacts.













































                                                      111-46






  0










































                          SECTION IV: PROPOSED LAND AND WATER USES AND PROPOSED PROJECTS




  0










                                              CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                   LOCAL MATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN

                      SECTION IV: PROPOSED LAND AND WATER USES AND PROPOSED PROJECTS

                                              TABLE OF CONTENTS

             SECTION NUMBER AND TITLE                                                PAGE

             1.     INTRODUCTION                                                     IV -5

             2.     IDENTIFICATION OF LWRP SUBAREAS                                  IV -5

             3.     DESCRIPTION OF LWRP SUBAREAS                                     IV -6
                    A.    Subarea  A -   Durand Eastman Park                         IV -6
                    B.    Subarea  B -   Open space/critical  environmental areas    IV -9
                    C.    Subarea  C1 -  Developed portion of the upland area        IV-12
                    D.    Subarea  C2 -  Buildable portion of the upland area        IV-12
                    E.    Subarea  D -   River harbor zone and lakefront area        IV-14
                    F.    Subarea  E -   Industrial areas                            IV-16

             4.     RECOMMENDED LAND USES FOR EACH'SUBAREA                           IV-18
                    A.    Introduction                                               IV-18
                    B.    Subarea  A -   Durand Eastman Park                         IV-24
                    C.    Subarea  B -   Open space/critical  environmental areas    IV-25
                    D.    Subarea  C1 -  Developed portion of the upland area        IV-26
                    E.    Subarea  C2 -  Buildable portion of the upland area        IV-27
                    F.    Subarea  D -   River harbor zone and lakefront area        IV-28
                    G.    Subarea  E -   Industrial areas                            IV-31

             5.     RECOMMENDED PROJECTS WITHIN THE LWRP                             IV-32
                    A.    Introduction                                               IV-32
                    B.    Development of the Port Authority site                     IV-33
                    C.    Summary of Ontario Beach Park/Port Authority
                          site concept plan components                               IV-37
                    D.    Development of the River Street site                       IV-42
                    E.    Summary of River Harbor Area concept    plan
                          components                                                 IV-45
                    F.    Development of Genesee River boat launch facility          IV-50
                    G.    Development of various improvements to the
                          LWRP parks                                                 IV-50

             SUMMARY OF SECTION                                                      IV-52












                                                      IV-3









                    INTRODUCTION

                    The policies of the City of Rochester's Local Waterfront Revitalization
                    Program (LWRP) were developed into a cohesive, physical plan for the
                    city's waterfront area through the identification of appropriate land uses
                    and projects for the various subareas within the LWRP boundary.        These
                    land uses and projects, in turn, reflect and implement the city's policy
                    goals and statements for the waterfront area as outlined in SECTION III:
                    POLICIES.   The process of developing appropriate land uses and projects
                    included the identification of general land use subareas, assessment of
                    the city's land use needs, and consideration of the development potential
                    and constraints of major waterfront sites within the LWRP boundary. In
                    addition, the city evaluated the proposed land uses and projects against
                    the applicable policy goals and statements, in order to ensure that the
                    land use plan was consistent with those policy objectives. A citizen's
                    advisory committee (CAC) was formed to aid city staff in the preparation
                    of development objectives and specific recommendations of the land use
                    plan.

              2.    IDEKTIFICATION OF LVRP SUBAREAS

                    In order to determine the types of land uses and projects which repre-
                    sented the most appropriate use of the city's waterfront resources, the
                    area within the LWRP boundary was divided into 6 subareas. These subareas
                    include:
   is                     Subarea  A  - Durand-Eastman Park
                          Subarea  B  - Open Space / Critical Environmental Areas
                          Subarea  C1 - Developed portion of the Upland Area
                          Subarea  C2 - Buildable portion of the Upland Area
                          Subarea  D  - River Harbor Zone and Lakefront Area
                          Subarea  E  - Industrial Areas

                    Each subarea was further divided into subzones which are shown on HAP IV-1
                    on page IV-7.

                    Each subarea was analyzed according to its development potential and
                    existing land use characteristics, based on the following general
                    classifications:

                          Areas of existing stable uses where significant changes in the
                          patterns of development were unlikely to occur.

                          Large areas of open space or environmentally sensitive land, or
                          undeveloped or inappropriately developed land suitable for a variety
                          of land uses, or suitable for land banking and/or protection.

                          Areas of particular concern, which typically included specific sites
                          where important natural or manmade resources were found, that
                          offered    unique  development    opportunities,    and/or   contained
                          incompatible uses or blighting conditions that needed to be removed.




                                                     IV-5










             3.     DESCRIPTION OF LWRP SUBAREAS

                    A.    Subarea A - Durand-Eastman Park

                          LWRP Subarea A is the 965 acre Durand-Eastman Park, which is located
                          on the shore of Lake Ontario, in the northeastern-most section of
                          the city. The park is surrounded by the Town of Irondequoit on the
                          west, south and east. The park is located west of Irondequoit Bay
                          and east of the Genesee River.    It can be entered from Lakeshore
                          Boulevard, Kings Highway and St. Paul Boulevard.       Durand-Eastman
                          Park is leased to Monroe County which is responsible for its
                          operation and maintenance. The park is zoned as an Open Space (OS)
                          District.

                          Recreational facilities within Durand-Eastman Park include hiking,
                          bridle and cross-country ski trails, picnic shelters, playground
                          areas, a riding stable and an 18-hole golf course with clubhouse.
                          The park also contains approximately 10,000 linear feet of lake
                          frontage and an abandoned beach area.

                          The park is characterized by various unique and sensitive environ-
                          mental features including several ponds and wetland areas, steep
                          wooded slopes and valleys, small lakes, as well as a portion of the
                          Monroe County Arboretum.    Spring flowering trees and spectacular
                          fall foliage colors make this park an area of exceptional beauty
                          with many scenic views and vistas.     Unique topography and soils
                          permit many species of plants to grow within the park that are not
                          normally native to this area.    Ponds within the park are heavily
                          utilized by fishermen during the spring and summer months. The park
                          is invaluable as a nature area and contains a significant deer
                          population of between 200 and 300 animals, as well as several
                          wetland areas that act as natural fish and wildlife habitats.. The
                          park also contains the Frank E. VanLare Treatment Plant which
                          processes sanitary and storm sewage collected from a major portion
                          of Monroe County via a series of underground tunnels.

                          Monroe County has prepared, in cooperation with the city, a master
                          plan for the future development of Durand-Eastman Park. The master
                          plan recommends that:

                                The beach area of the park should be redeveloped and increased
                                in size through the construction of a seawall and/or groins
                                supplemented by a phased program of beach nourishment;

                                A bathhouse should be constructed in the beach area along with
                                various safety facilities including lifeguard tower stations
                                and buoys, lines and markers;

                                Additional parking should be provided along Lake Shore
                                Boulevard along with suitable safe crossings between the beach
                                area and the remainder of the park;




                                                    IV-6











                                                    L-All
                               SUMMS WVU908d 110111MIMA38 lNOdjH3lVm Ivoul
                                                   t-Al dvw



                                                                                         7?i







                                     A i 'I I
                         rir  I I







                                                                                ....... ...





                                                                                              N. k








                                                                 j
                                                                                if








                                              A








                                                                                                oil
                                                                                                 lit



                                                       z    ;I                         ......


                                                                          IF
                                                                                           to

                                                         It

                                                                                                     !.1t
                                                      IF
                                                                                                     it


                                                                              4b







                                                                 % V









                                 A nature center and outdoor ampl i theatre should be constructed
                                 within the park, along with sufficient accessory parking and
                                 support facilities;

                                 A system of hiking trails should be developed within the park
                                 that connect the proposed nature center, satellite nature
                                 study areas and wildlife study areas.

                          The City of Rochester considers Subarea A to be an area which
                          requires special attention and protection because of the many unique
                          and important natural resources and recreational opportunities found
                          there.   The presence of sensitive natural features such as steep
                          wooded slopes, wetlands and wildlife habitat areas requires that
                          Subarea A continue to remain in its present undeveloped state as
                          public parkland and open space.         Monroe County currently has
                          approxi 'mately $5.1 million worth of capital improvements programed
                          for the park through 1996.         The city agrees with the major
                          recommendations contained in the Durand-Eastman Park Master Plan
                          developed by Monroe County and will promote and encourage several
                          specific park plan improvements through its LWRP.
                          Subarea A contains two geographic 'subzones that will be utilized
                          later to delineate specific land use recommendations.             These
                          subzones include:

                          (Al) The Durand-Eastman Park shoreline;

                          (A2) The remainder of Durand-Eastman Park.

                    B.    Subarea B - Open Space L Critical Environmental Areas

                          LWRP Subarea B includes open space and critical environmental areas
                          within the LWRP boundary such as           steep slopes,      wetlands,
                          floodplains, fish and wildlife habitats, and scenic views and
                          vistas. Subarea B comprises the entire Genesee River gorge, from
                          the Lower Fal I s on the south to the northern edge of the
                          state- des i gnated wetland area on the west bank of the river near
                          Denise Road.    Subarea B includes Turning Point Park, Riverside
                          Cemetery, Seneca Park, Maplewood Park and Lower Falls Park.
                          Virtually all lands contained within Subarea 2, including the public
                          parks, are zoned as Open Space (OS) Districts.

                          Turning Point Park is located on the west bank of the Genesee River,
                          just south of the Turning Basin. The park can be entered from Lake
                          Avenue via Boxart Street. The southern boundary of the park borders
                          Riverside Cemetery.    Turning Point Park is designed as a natural
                          area and contains passive recreational facilities such as hiking
                          trails and picnic areas. The park provides access to the river's
                          edge for fishing and canoeing and is noted for its spectacular views
                          of the river gorge and the turning basin. Turning Point Park is
                          owned, operated and maintained by the city.




                                                     IV-9









                           The city has proposed various minor physical improvements to Turning
                           Point Park.   These improvements include the development of cartop
                           boat access to the river and the enhancement of a pedestrian trail
                           to the south and west, along an abandoned railroad bed. This trail
                           could be potentially linked up with a larger trail system which
                           would run along the length of the river, from the port area south to
                           the Barge Canal.

                           Seneca Park contains 297 acres and is located on the east bank of
                           the Genesee River, north and south of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge.
                           The park can be entered from St. Paul Boulevard, just north of Route
                           104. Recreational facilities within Seneca Park include an outdoor
                           swimming pool with bathhouse, a zoo, playgrounds and softball
                           fields, two picnic shelters, as well as hiking, nature and jogging
                           trails. In addition, the park contains steep wooded slopes along
                           the river bank, wetlands, and spectacular scenic views of the
                           Genesee River Gorge. The park was originally designed by Frederick
                           Law Olmstead.     The park is leased to Monroe County which is
                           responsible for its operation and maintenance.

                           Monroe County, in cooperation with the city, is in the process of
                           developing a master plan for Seneca Park.      The city supports the
                           maintenance, protection and enhancement of the original Olmstead
                           plan and design for the park. The city supports the development of
                           new pedestrian trails and overlooks within the park, a general
                           upgrading and expansion of the park zoo, as well as an investigation
                           of expanding the park to the north, along the Genesee River. Such
                           an expansion could be used to protect sensitive wetland areas and
                           steep, wooded slopes along the river bank, as well as to provide
                           additional hiking trails for potential nature studies or similar
                           activities.

                           Maplewood Park contains 14 acres and is located along the west side
                           of the Genesee River, between the Driving Park Bridge and the
                           Veteran's Memorial Bridge.    The park can be entered from Hanford
                           Landing, Driving Park Avenue as well as from various pedestrian
                           trails. The park contains passive recreational areas that include
                           informal picnicking and strolling areas.       In addition, the park
                           contains one of the largest rose gardens in the country.        Several
                           overlooks within the park provide spectacular views of the river
                           gorge.   Maplewood Park is owned by the city which maintains the
                           middle and northern portions of the park. Monroe County maintains
                           the southern end of the park.

                           Monroe County is also preparing, in cooperation with the city, a
                           master plan for the development of Maplewood Park. The city would
                           like to see additional pedestrian trails and paths developed within
                           the park, along with improvements to and expansions of existing
                           parking facilities. The city also supports the connection of the
                           park to an existing pedestrian trail along Bridgeway Drive, and the
                           development of safe, controlled fishing access to the river, in
                           appropriate locations along the park's riverfront.



                                                     IV-10








                         Lower Falls Park is currently undeveloped and is located along the
                         west bank of the Genesee River near the Maplewood YMCA, just south
                         of the Driving Park Bridge. The park can be accessed from Driving

                         Park Avenue via Hastings Street.     The park contains 3 acres and
                         provides spectacular views of the Lower Falls and the surrounding
                         river gorge.    The park is leased to Monroe County and is being
                         evaluated as a part of the master plan effort that includes
                         Maplewood and Seneca Parks.

                         The city supports development of Lower Falls Park as an archaeologic
                         and/or interpretive site, focusing on the remains and ruins of
                         former mill structures and other buildings in the area that date
                         back to the early 1800's. Several building foundations can be seen
                         in the park, while other remains are buried and would have to be
                         unearthed and partially restored.      The city also supports the
                         construction of river overlooks within the park to enhance scenic
                         views of the gorge and falls.

                         The remainder of Subarea B includes Riverside and Holy Sepulchre
                         Cemeteries, which occupy a large open space area on the west bank of
                         the river, just south of Turning Point Park and east of Lake Avenue,
                         and the steep wooded slopes, wetlands and wildlife habitat areas
                         within the river gorge.

                         The city considers Subarea B to be another significant area within
                         the LWRP boundary that requires special attention and protection
                         because of the many unique and important natural resources and
                         recreational opportunities found there.       The public parks and
                         undeveloped open space within Subarea B are protected through the
                         use of the restrictive Open Space (OS) zoning district which
                         regulates or prohibits land uses and development activity.          In
                         additon, all parkland within this Subarea is publicly owned. The
                         presence of sensitive natural features such as steep wooded slopes,
                         wetlands, wildlife habitat areas and spectacular scenic views
                         requires that Subarea B be maintained in its present undeveloped
                         state as public parkland and open space.

                         The city does not forsee any type of significant development taking
                         place within the open space areas of the river gorge in Subarea B.
                         The city does support, however, various improvements to the public
                         parks located in this area as a way to enhance water-related
                         recreational opportunites along the river. The city will continue
                         to work with Monroe County to implement those improvements.

                         Subarea 6 contains seven geographic subzones that will be utilized
                         later to delineate specific land use recommendations.           These
                         subzones include:

                         (Bl) Turning Point Park;

                         (82) Seneca Park;



                                                   IV-11









                              (B3) Maplewood Park;

                              (B4)  Lower Falls Park;

                              (B5)  Seth Green area;

                              (B6)  Rattlesnake Point area;

                              (B7)  Riverside Cemetery.

                       C.     Subarea CI - Developed portion of the Upland Area

                              LWRP Subarea C1 includes upland areas that contain existing
                              residential, commercial and industrial development.          This upland
                              area extends through an extensive residential zone along Beach
                              Avenue and Lake Avenue, from the city line on the north, to
                              Riverside Cemetery on the south. Another large portion of Subarea
                              C1 includes residential areas around Kodak Park as well as between
                              Lake Avenue and Maplewood Park, from Ridge Road West to Driving Park
                              Avenue. Subarea C1 includes portions of residential neighborhoods
                              such as Charlotte and Maplewood, small strip commercial areas, and
                              the industrial facilities of Kodak Park. There is relatively little
                              undeveloped or underutilized land within LWRP Subarea C1.           Zoning
                              classifications contained within the Subarea include large sections
                              of residential ly-zoned land (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5), areas
                              zoned for commercial use (C-1, C-2 and C-3) and areas zoned for
                              industrial use (M-2).     All portions of Subarea C1 are adequately
                              served by public utilities including storm and sanitary sewers, gas
                              and water lines and streets and highways.

                              Because Subarea C1 is an upland area, land use and development
                              activities within it do not have an immediate or significant impact
                              on the shorezone. The subarea has a definite urban character and
                              provides little if any physical or visual access to the river. The
                              city considers Subarea C1 to be stable in terms of its present land
                              uses and does not anticipate any significant changes in the area's
                              development patterns.     The city does not anticipate rezoning any
                              areas within Subarea C1 as a result of the adoption of the LWRP.

                              Subarea C1 contains two geographic subzones that will be utilized
                              later to delineate specific land use recommendations.                These
                              subzones include:

                              (C-1-A)      Lake Avenue/Stutson Street area;

                              (C-1-B)      Remainder of the upland area.

                       D.     Subarea C2 - Buildable portion of the Upland Area

                              LWRP Subarea C2 includes the buildable or undeveloped portion of the
                              upland area within the LWRP boundary.        This subarea includes two
                              sites where new development is currently underway. The first site
                              is located just north of Riverside Cemetery and west of Turning


                                                         IV-12









                         Point Park, within an existing residential area that extends from
                         Boxart Street to Burley Road.     The new development in this area
                         includes 56 single-family residential units constructed within three
                         new cul-de-sacs and on infill lots. In addition, small areas within
                         the subdivision were retained and zoned as permanent open space.
                         The developers are currently completing phase III of the plan. This
                         subdivision is adjacent to a new pedestrian trail which will provide
                         access into Turning Point Park from the south.

                         The second developable site within Subarea C2 is the former St.
                         Bernard's Seminary located on the east side of Lake Avenue, between
                         Riverside Cemetery and the Kodak Research Laboratories.       Eastman
                         Kodak Company has purchased this land which has been rezoned to a
                         Manufacturing-Industrial Planned Development District (M-IPD). This
                         zoning district permits the development of typical manufacturing or
                         industrial facilities and allows flexible planning and design
                         standards.    Eastman Kodak will develop the existing Seminary
                         building into a industrial research facility that preserves the
                         architectural and historic integrity of the structure and grounds.
                         Kodak may also construct new buildings on the site, to be located to
                         the north and/or south of the Seminary building, in existing open
                         space areas. The city will ensure, through existing site -plan and
                         environmental review procedures, that redevelopment of the building
                         and grounds and construction of new buildings on the site are
                         undertaken in a manner which preserves and enhances the aesthetic
                         and historic qualities of the area.

                         The city recognizes that Subarea C2 contains developable or
                         underutilized land. Development activities proposed for this area,
                         however, have been clearly defined and will be reviewed and
                         regulated using existing zoning and environmental controls. It is
                         not anticipated that these land uses will have a direct or
                         significant impact on the waterfront area.        When the proposed
                         development activities outlined above are completed, the city will
                         consider Subarea C1 to be stable in terms of its existing land uses
                         and would not anticipate any significant changes in the area's
                         development patterns in the foreseeable future. The city does not
                         anticipate rezoning any additional areas within Subarea C2 as a
                         result of thd adoption of the LWRP.

                         Subarea C2 contains two geographic subzones that will be utilized
                         later to delineate specific land use recommendations.           These
                         subzones include:

                         (C-2-A)      Boxart Street   Burley Road Area;

                         (C-2-B)      Eastman Kodak   St. Bernard's Seminary.








                                                   IV-13










                    E.     Subarea D - River Harbor Zone and Lakefront Area

                           LWRP Subarea D contains the river harbor zone at the mouth of the
                           river, and lakefront areas adjacent to Ontario Beach Park and along
                           Beach Avenue.      This subarea is characterized by extensive
                           water-related recreational and commercial activity and includes two
                           major undeveloped or underutilized sites that together form the
                           focus of the city's diverse waterfront areas.

                           The river harbor zone within Subarea D extends from the mouth of the
                           Genesee River on Lake Ontario, to the southern end of existing
                           marina development on the river, near Denise Road.         Thi s zone
                           includes: the Summerville area and U.S. Coast Guard Station on the
                           east bank of the river near Lake Ontario; extensive private marina
                           development also located on the east bank of the river, north of
                           Stutson Street; the Port Authority site and River Street site
                           located on the west bank of the river, north of Stutson Street; and,
                           additional private marina development located on the west bank of
                           the river, south of Stutson Street in the vicinity of Petten Street.
                           The vast majority of this area is zoned as a River-Harbor (R-H)
                           District.  The River Street site contains a small amount of land
                           zoned as a manufacturing (M-1) district.

                           The 22 acre Port Authority site includes 2 abandoned warehouse
                           structures, a 4-ramp boat launch facility constructed and operated
                           by Monroe County, and a large parking area. The port site is owned
                           by the city with the exception of the existing boat launch facility
                           which is owned by the County.       The entire area is zoned as a
                           River-Harbor (R-H) District. Access to the port site is obtained
                           via Lake Avenue and Beach Avenue. Development constraints on the
                           site include the possible need to realign the sanitary sewers in the
                           area, soil types with bearing capacities that limit the height of
                           buildings that can be constructed on the site, and the existing
                           warehouses which limit views of the river.

                           The River Street site, located to the south of the port site and
                           immediately adjacent to the river, has a unique neighborhood
                           character that results from its topography and relative seclusion,
                           its architecture, as well as the many small bars, restaurants 'and
                           commercial establishments found in the area. The site also includes
                           an abandoned railroad station that has significant development
                           potential. In addition, the site is located adjacent to the Genesee
                           Lighthouse which is listed on the National Register of Historic
                           Places.  The city owns the land immediately adjacent to the west
                           bank of the river, from an area near the Pelican Bay Marina on the
                           north, to an area just south of the Stutson Street Bridge. These
                           land holdings include the abandoned railroad station. Development
                           constraints on the River Street site include the location of a sewer
                           pumping station and RG&E substation in the area, the disection of
                           the site by the Conrail tracks, the lack of adequate parking, and
                           the design and condition of River Street itself.




                                                     IV-14










                         The lakefront zone within Subarea D extends from the river west
                         along Lake Ontario to the city line near Greeenleaf Road. This zone
                         includes Ontario Beach Park which is located on the lake at the
                         mouth of the river, as well as existing lakefront residential
                         development located on the north side of Beach Avenue, to the west
                         of the park.

                         Ontario Beach Park contains 39 acres and is currently undergoing
                         extensive redevelopment and reconstruction. The park features one
                         of the best natural sand beaches on Lake Ontario.       The park is
                         accessed from Lake Avenue and Beach Avenue.    Recreational uses in
                         the park include the beach and bathhouse, supervised swimming, a
                         soccer field, 2 softball fields, an outdoor ice-skating rink, 6
                         picnic pavilions, an outdoor, performance pavilion and various
                         concession stands.    An antique Dentzel carousel which has been
                         designated as a Rochester Historic Landmark is located at the
                         eastern end of the park. The park is zoned as an Open Space (OS)
                         District and is leased to Monroe County which is responsible for its
                         operation and maintenance.

                         Monroe County, in cooperation with the city, has developed a master
                         plan for the redevelopment of Ontario Beach Park. The master plan
                         proposes the rehabilitation of the bathhouse and several existing
                         picnic pavilions, construction of a new performance pavilion and
                         beach boardwalk, as well as new. landscaping, parking areas and
                         pedestrian circulation paths. The city supports the recommendations
                         contained in the plan and, through the plan review process, has
                         ensured that redevelopment of the park is coordinated with the
                         development of the port site to the south.

                         The city has prepared a comprehensive development plan for the port
                         site that proposes the establishment of a marina, festival area,
                         aquarium, or waterfront discovery center/museum adjacent to the
                         river. The plan utilizes the two existing warehouses on the site.
                         The plan maintains the county boat launch facility in its present
                         location and expands its parking area. The city has also prepared
                         a plan for the redevelopment of the river harbor area which includes
                         River Street, the Lake Avenue corridor north of the Lake Ontario
                         Parkway, and the area between Lake Avenue and River Street, north of
                         Stutson Street. This plan includes construction of boat slips and
                         a pedestrian walkway along the river, development of open space
                         areas and picnic shelters along the river, redevelopment of the
                         railroad station into a riverside restaurant, construction of
                         additional parking areas, and development of new housing in two
                         specific areas.

                         The city recognizes that LWRP Subarea D, which includes the Port
                         Authority site and the River Street site, represents a significant
                         opportunity to develop or enhance water-related recreational and
                         commercial uses adjacent to the lake and river.    These uses could
                         include boating, fishing, passive recreation activities such as
                         walking, hiking and biking, as well as marine-related stores, shops,
                         bars and restaurants. Major special events such as fishing derbies,


                                                  IV-15









                             water sports activities and concerts could also be included in the
                             development program. Subarea D is the only area within the city's
                             LWRP where greater public access to and use of the river and lake
                             could be provided, and where the local economy could be stimulated
                             through the development of uses which must be located on or near the
                             water in order to prosper. The city considers Subarea D to be its
                             prime opportunity site and the one which requires the most city
                             involvement to ensure that appropriate redevelopment occurs in a
                             manner which will realize the area's full potential.

                             Subarea D contains eleven geographic subzones that will be utilized
                             later to delineate specific land use recommendations.                  These
                             subzones include:

                             (DI)   Beach Avenue residential area;

                             (D2)   Ontario Beach Park;

                             (0)    Lake Avenue / Estes Street area;

                             (N)    Port Authority Site;

                             (D5)   River Street Site;

                             (D6)   Lake Avenue commercial area;

                             (W)    Petten Street area;

                             (D8)   Marina area;

                             (D9)   Summerville area;

                             (DIO)  Railroad to Stutson Street (east bank of river);

                             (D11)  Stutson Street to Rattlesnake Point (east bank of river).

                      F.     Subarea E - Industrial Areas

                             LWRP Subarea E contains three sites that are zoned and used for
                             industrial activities.      The first site is located at the end of
                             Boxart Street, adjacent to Turning Point Park. The site is utilized
                             by the Portland Cement Company. The company receives shipments of
                             cement from special cargo ships which sail up the Genesee River from
                             Lake Ontario, to a small docking area located along the east bank of
                             the river, within Turning Point Park. The cement is then piped to
                             a processing facility located a short distance away, within an M-1
                             Manufacturing District. The land which is used for the docking area
                             and the pipe system for the cement is in Turning Point Park and is
                             owned by the city. This use is water-dependent although the site is
                             not located immediately adjacent to the river. Access to the river
                             for the site is controlled by the city.




                                                         IV-16









                         The second site is located on the east bank of the river, just north
                         of Maplewood Park. The site is owned by Eastman Kodak Company and
                         is used for an industrial waste treatment facility that services
                         manufacturing operations located in Kodak Park to the west.       The
                         site is zoned as an M-1 Manufacturing District and is accessed via
                         Hanford Landing and Maplewood Drive.      The treatment pl ant is a
                         water-dependent use which is located adjacent to the river, within
                         the gorge. In addition to the treatment facility, this portion of
                         Subarea E includes the Kodak Park manufacturing facility located
                         west of Lake Avenue and north of Ridge Road West.          This area
                         includes an array of buildings and facilities where Kodak manufac-
                         tures such products as photographic film, paper, chemicals and other
                         supplies.   Kodak's Research Laboratories are also located in this
                         general area. Kodak Park is zoned as an M-2 Manufacturing District.

                         The third site within LWRP Subarea E is located on the west bank of
                         the river, just south of the Driving Park Bridge. The site is owned
                         by Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) and is used for the
                         Station 5 hydroelectric power plant. This plant generates electri-
                         city using hydropower produced by the Middle Falls Dam. Water is
                         diverted from the dam and piped via a tunnel to the power plant.
                         Access to the plant is from Seth Green Drive to the north. The area
                         around the plant, adjacent to the river, provides exceptional
                         fishing opportunities. Public access to this area, however, is not
                         well-developed and is controlled by RUE. The site is zoned as an
                         M-1 Manufacturing District.

                         An additional site zoned for manufacturing use contained in Subarea
                         E is located at the top of the west bank of the Genesee River, at
                         the end of Glenwood Avenue. This site is currently being used for
                         a mechanic's laundry.

                         Two smaller manufacturing facilities are located within the LWRP
                         boundary but outside of the three sites outlined above.         These
                         facilities include the Tape-Con Company, located on River Street at
                         Latta Road, and Weyerhauser, located on Boxart Street.            The
                         Weyerhauser facility includes several other smaller manufacturing
                         companies.

                         The city considers Subarea E to be stable in terms of its present
                         land uses and does not anticipate any significant changes in the
                         area's development patterns. The city does not anticipate rezoning
                         any areas within Subarea E as a result of the adoption of the LWRP.
                         The water-dependent, industrial uses which are currently located in
                         this subarea are expected to remain for the forseeable future.
                         Should expansions or modifications to the existing industrial land
                         uses be proposed, the city will review those proposals in terms of
                         the policy goals and statements contained in the LWRP, using
                         existing site plan and environmental review procedures.        Should
                         changes in land use be proposed for these areas at some point in the
                         future, the city will ensure that such uses take advantage of their
                         waterfront locations and are appropriate in terms of overall
                         shorezone development priorities.


                                                   IV-17









                          Subarea E contains five geographic subzones that will be utilized
                          later to delineate specific land use recommendations.           These
                          subzones include:

                          (EI)  Portland Cement Company;

                          (E2)  Kodak Park;

                          (B)   RGH Station 5 Power Plant;

                          (R)   Tape-Con;

                          (E5)  Weyerhauser.


              4.    RECOMMENDED LAW USES FOR EACH LVRP SUBAREA

                    A.    Introduction

                          In order to aid city staff in the preparation of development
                          objectives for the waterfront area, as well as to help develop the
                          specific recommendations of the land use plan, an LWRP Citizen's
                          Advisory Committee (CAC) was formed. This group met on a regular
                          basis with city staff over a period of several years. The group
                          analyzed the LWRP subareas in terms of the appropriate LWRP policy
                          goals and statements outlined in SECTION 111, in order to develop
                          appropriate land use recommendations for each of those areas. These
                          recommenda-tions included both water-dependent and water-enhanced
                          recreation, commercial and open space uses.

                          The CAC developed generalized land use needs and objectives for the
                          various subareas within the city's LWRP. These land use objectives
                          were based on a review and analysis of the city's LWRP policies and
                          included the following:

                                Environmentally-sensitive or unique areas of special concern
                                within the LWRP boundary should be preserved and enhanced.
                                These areas included such natural features as steep wooded
                                slopes, watercourses, floodplains, erosion-hazard areas,
                                beaches, bluffs, scenic views and vistas, fish and wildlife
                                habitats, and architecturally or historically significant
                                sites.

                                Appropriate water-dependent uses and activities should be
                                developed in the shorezone that take advantage of their
                                waterfront location, enhance the visual and aesthetic
                                qualities of the waterfront, and contribute to the economic
                                development of the city.

                                Appropriate water-enhanced or water-dependent recreational
                                uses and activities should be developed along the lake and
                                river that take advantage of their waterfront location
                                enhance the visual and aesthetic qualities of the waterfront:    40

                                                   IV-18








                                and   increase   the   type   and  variety    of    recreational
                                opportunities available. These uses or activities included
                                marinas, boat-docks and slips, boat launching ramps, public
                                walkways, picnic and other open space areas, fishing and
                                swimming areas, other more passive recreational activities,
                                and marine-related commercial uses.

                                Existing and stable residential, commercial and industrial
                                areas should be protected and enhanced.

                                The Port Authority site and the River Street site should be
                                recognized and treated as unique development opportunities
                                within the waterfront area.

                                A mixed-use, water-oriented maritime/waterfront center should
                                be developed on the port site, that takes maximum advantage of
                                its waterfront location, enhances the ambience of the
                                shorezone, provides public access to the waterfront, and
                                increases public recreational opportuntities.

                                A mix of water-oriented uses' and activities should be
                                developed on the River Street site and within the river harbor
                                area in general, that takes maximum advantage of their
                                waterfront location, enhances the unique neighborhood and
                                maritime ambience and history of the area, provides public
                                access   to   the   river,   increases   public     recreational
                                opportuntities, and rehabilitates existing structures as much
                                as possible.

                         Having developed a generalized set of land use goals or objectives
                         to be implemented within the LWRP boundary through specific land use
                         recommendations for each subarea, the CAC reviewed the specific LWRP
                         policies in terms of their relevancy to each subarea.         The LWRP
                         policies were grouped into three broad categories and were
                         then evaluated against each subarea to determine whether and how
                         each policy should be considered when determining specific land use
                         recommendations for the six subareas.          The results of this
                         evaluation process are contained in TABLE IV-1 on pages IV-21 and
                         IV-22. In developing the land use recommendations for the six LWRP
                         Subareas, the committee also reviewed and considered the existing
                         land use controls that are in place within the City of Rochester's
                         LWRP boundary.

                         The LWRP policy evaluation for each subarea indicated those policy
                         goals and statements that the committee considered important and
                         relevant for the various geographical areas within the LWRP
                         boundary.   This evaluation also led to discussions regarding how
                         each policy should be implemented or addressed in the proposed land
                         use plan. Specific land use recommendations were then developed for
                         each subarea from a wide range of potential uses or activities.





                                                    IV-19













                                                                                  TABLE IV-1


                                                             LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                         SUMMARY OF LWRP POLICY EVALUATIONS BY SUBAREA
                                                                              (key on page IV-22)

                                                                                                       LV*1RP SUBAREAS
                              LViRP POLJCIES BY GE3111311AL CATEGORY                             (see text for subarea description)



                              PRON110TE COASTAL USES                                                                       C2          D


                              IRevitalize waterfront areas                                     x                                       x


                              2Facilitate dependent us"                                        x       x                               x       x

                              4Redevelop existing built environment                                    x                               x

                              5Encourage development near public services

                              23 Protect historic structures

                              9Expand access/recreational use                                  x       x                               x

                              19 Protect public access to water-oriented recreation            x       x                               x

                              20 Provide public access to shore                                x       x                               x       x

                              21 Encourage water-oriented recreation

                              22 Develop recreation as multl-use

                              27 Develop energy resources                                      +                           +                   +

                              6Expedite permit procedures

                              PROTECT COASTAL RESOURCES                                        A       8          C11      C2          D       E



                              7Protect fish/wIldiffe habitats


                              8Control hazardous wastes


                              4Promote traditional character of harbor areas                           x                               x


                              24 Protect scenic areas

                              12 Protect dunes and natural protective features

                              44 Protect wetland areas                                         x       x

                              27 Site energy facilities In appropriate locations               +       +                   +           +       +

                              31 Consider coastal policies In reviewing water
                              classifications


                              33 Use best management practices to control runoff

                              40 Control effluent discharge

                              41 Maintain air quality standards                                +       +          +                    +

                              42 Reclassify land based on Clean Air Act                        +                  4                    +

                              43 Prevent acid rain generators                                                     +        +           +

                              2S Protect scenic resources                                      x       x                   x           x       x




                                                                                    IV-20














                                                                         TABLE IV-1

                                                         LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                                      SUMMARY OF LWRP POLICY EVALUATIONS BY SUBAREA
                                                                        (continued)

                                                                                                LWRP SUBAREAS
                             LURP POLICIES BY GENERAL CATEGORY                    (see text for subarea description)



                           REGULATE MAJOR CORSTAL ACTIVITIES                           A                                            E

                      39  Manage solid wastes                                          *       *

                      15  Control dredging, mining and excavations                    4:


                      11  Control construction in erosion hazard areas

                      13  Regulate erosion protection structures

                      14  Prevent erosion and flooding

                      16  Use of pubtic funds for erosion control

                      17  Use non-structural flood and erosion protection

                      18  Review major coastal activities                                      X                          X         X



                             KEY:     X = very relevant poti@y;        relevant poLicy; +      less relevant  potic

                                      Blank: = not a relevant s)oLicv


                                      Based on the LWRP policy evaluations, as well as general land
                                      characteristics and development constraints found within the LWRP
                                      boundary, a range of potential land uses or activities that was
                                      considered appropriate within the subareas was developed by the
                                      committee and included:

                                               Marinas;

                                               Public walkways, promenades, pedestrian paths,
                                               hiking and biking trails, bridal paths;

                                               Swimming areas and beaches;

                                               Boat launches and boat ramps;

                                               Boat docks and slips, finger piers, T-piers;

                                               Fishing areas;.

                                               Water-rel ated retai I support f aci 1 i ti es (bai t and
                                               tackle shops, fishing/boating supply stores,
                                               etc.);

                                               Hotels, boatels, bed and breakfast operations;

                                               Industrial         or      municipal          waste        treatment
                                               facilities;


                                                                           IV-21









                                 Power generating facilities;

                                 Shipping facilities;

                                 Museums (waterfront-related museum facilities,
                                 interpretive centers, historic displays, historic
                                 landmarks, etc.);

                                 Picnicking areas and open space areas;

                                 Parking;

                                 General retail facilities including stores and
                                                           restaurants;

                                 Office research facilities and laboratories;

                                 Manufacturing facilities;

                                 Housing at various densities;

                                 Field sports (softball, soccer, etc.);

                                 Waterfront access for cartop boats and canoes;

                                 Zoo;

                                 Outdoor    entertainment    facilities     (gazebos,
                                 bandshells, performance pavilions, etc.);

                                 Festival     site    (water-oriented,      mixed-use
                                 entertainment area with associated commercial
                                 uses);

                                 Spectator    site    for   off-shore    events    or
                                 activities.

                           In addition to an identification of the range of appropriate land
                           uses to be considered for the LWRP Subareas, the CAC established
                           whether or not each potential use was water -dependent, water-
                           enhanced or unrelated to the water, in each subarea and subzone.

                           In order to determine which specific land uses from the above list
                           were appropriate for each subarea, a rating sheet and rating
                           criteria were developed by city staff and distributed to committee
                           members.    The rating sheet listed all potential uses for each
                           subarea and subzone, noted the type of relationship the use had with
                           the water, and listed the rating categories and scores to be used.
                           Committee members were asked to evaluate and score each subzone
                           within the six LWRP subareas in terms of how well a particular use
                           located in that area would satisfy the following criteria:


                                                     IV-22









                                   The particular use in the proposed location
                                   PROMOTED COASTAL USES (addressed the applicable
                                   LWRP Policies as determined by the committee).

                                   The particular use in the proposed location
                                   PROTECTED COASTAL RESOURCES          (addressed the
                                   applicable LWRP Policies as determined by the
                                   committee).

                                   The particular use in the proposed location
                                   'SUPPORTED ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS          (addressed
                                   economic costs and benefits as determined by the
                                   committee).

                                   The particular use in the proposed location
                                   SUPPORTED    EXISTING    OR    PROPOSED     WATERFRONT
                                   DEVELOPMENT POLICIES (addressed other applicable
                                   policies contained within existing or proposed
                                   master plans, comprehensive development plans,
                                   etc., as determined by the committee).

                            The rating process consisted of an evaluation, by each committee
                            member, of the appropriateness of a particular use in a given
                            subzone,'based on how well that use satisfied each of the criteria
                            I i sted above. For exampl e, commi ttee members were asked to eval uate
                            the appropriateness of a marina located at the Durand-Eastman Park
                            shorel i ne, based on how wel I that use i n that 1 ocati on woul d promote
                            coastal    uses,   protect    coastal    resources,    support economic
                            considerations and support existing or proposed waterfront policy.
                            Committee ratings were based on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 equalled
                            a superior score.

                            Using a computerized statistical analysis program, committee ratings
                            for each use in each subzone were analyzed to determine average
                            committee scores, as well as the high and low score given for each
                            criteria. Results from the computer analysis were then reviewed to
                            determine which of the uses that were ranked the highest by the
                            committee were actually appropriate and desirable for each subzone.
                            This review was based on the following additional considerations:

                                   Was the proposed use realistic in terms of
                                   current land use patterns, development trends and
                                   projected needs in the proposed location?;

                                   Was the proposed use appropriate in terms of its
                                   relationship    to   the    physical    features,     environmental
                                   constraints, and other determinants of the suitability of land
                                   for development at the proposed location?;

                                   Did the proposed use concentrate development in a
                                   location     that    includes     adequate      public
                                   infrastructure and services?;

                                                        IV-23








                                  Did the proposed use in the proposed location
                                  allocate adequate space for existing and future
                                  water-dependent   uses   and   reduce   or    avoid
                                  conflicts     between     water-dependent       and
                                  non-water-dependent uses?;

                                  Did the proposed use in the proposed location
                                  help maintain or increase public access to the
                                  shoreline?;

                                  Did the proposed use in the proposed location
                                  minimize, reduce or eliminate the potential for
                                  I oss of human 1 i fe and property damage as a
                                  result of erosion and flooding?;

                                  Did the proposed use in the proposed location
                                  help to protect or enhance important natural,
                                  historic, cultural or scenic resources?

                           Based  on a comprehensive review of the rating scores and further
                           discussions of the criteria and other considerations mentioned above
                           for each use in each location, the committee developed a list of
                           proposed land uses for each of the 29 subzones within the LWRP
                           subareas. This list represents the basic elements of the proposed
                           land use plan for the city's LWRP.      It shoul d be noted that the
                           I i sts of recommended I and uses for the LWRP subareas do not
                           represent a priority ranking of those land uses for that particular
                           zone, but merely a generalized listing of appropriate types of
                           development for the area, as determined by the committee.

                     B.    Subarea A - Durand-Eastman Park

                           Within LWRP Subarea A (Durand-Eastman Park), the following land uses
                           are recommended to be promoted, encouraged and developed:


                                     LWRP SUBAREA A: DUIRAND-EASTNAN PARK
                                             RECOMMENDED LAND USES

              GEOGRAPHIC SUBZONE                           RECOMMENDED LAND USES

               (Al) Durand-Eastman Park Shoreline          Public walkway
                                                           Swimming areas
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Picnicking areas
                                                           Parking
                                                           Cartop boat access
                                                           Spectator site for off-shore events


               (A2) Remainder of Durand-Eastman Park       Public walkway
                                                     IV-24 Fishing areas









                                                          Treatment facilities
                                                          Picnicking areas
                                                          Parking
                                                          Field sports
                                                          Outdoor entertainment
                                                          Bridal paths

                          The land uses recommended for LWRP Subarea A (Durand-Eastman Park)
                          promote waterfront recreational opportunities, promote public access
                          to the shorezone, preserve or enhance sensitive environmental areas
                          and natural features, and do not conflict with existing land uses,
                          development patterns or zoning classifications. These land uses can
                          be encouraged and developed through the implementation of the
                          Durand-Eastman Park Master Plan, currently being prepared by Monroe
                          County, in cooperation with the city.       Treatment facilities are
                          listed as an appropriate use within the major portion of Durand-
                          Eastman Park because of the presence of the existing VanLare
                          Treatment Plant in the park and the realization that this land use
                          will remain in this location for the forseeable future.

                   C.     Subarea B - Open Space / Critical Environmental Areas

                          Within LWRP Subarea B (Open Space / Critical Environmental Areas),
                          the following land uses are recommended to be promoted, encouraged
                          and developed:


                        LWRP SUBAREA 8: OPEN SPACE / CRITICAL ENVIRONNE)ITAL AREAS
                                            RECOMMENDED LAND USES

             GEOGRAPHIC SUBZONE                           RECOMMENDED LAND USES

             (Bl) Turning Point Park                      Public walkway
                                                          Fishing areas
                                                          Picnicking areas
                                                          Parking
                                                          Cartop boat access

             (B2) Seneca Park                             Public walkway
                                                          Swimming areas
                                                          Fishing areas
                                                          Picnicking areas
                                                          Parking
                                                          Zoo
                                                          Outdoor entertainment

             (B3) Maplewood Park                          Public walkway
                                                          Fishing areas
                                                          Picnicking areas
                                                          Parking
                                                          Outdoor entertainment



                                                     IV-25










               (B4) Lower Falls Park                       Public walkway
                                                           Museum (historic/interpretive center)
                                                           Picnicking areas

               (B5) Seth Green area                        Public walkway
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Parking
                                                           Cartop boat access

               (B6) Rattlesnake Point area                 Public walkway
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Picnicking areas
                                                           Parking

               (B7) Riverside and Holy Sepulchre           Public walkway
                     Cemeteries                            Parking

                           Land uses recommended   for LWRP Subarea B (Open Space        Critical
                           Environmental Areas)    recognize that this area should remain
                           undeveloped, but that  public access to and through the area should
                           be improved. The recommended land uses promote waterfront recrea-
                           tion, preserve or enhance sensitive environmental areas and natural
                           features, do not conflict with existing land uses patterns, and
                           promote public access to the shorezone. These uses can be developed
                           through implementation of the park master plans being prepared by
                           Monroe County and the city.     Development proposed within Turning
                           Point and Lower Falls Park will be undertaken by the city.         The
                           proposed land uses for this subarea are permitted and regulated by
                           the Open Space (OS) Zoning District which covers most of this area.

                           The proposed land uses recommended for Subarea B also address
                           several of the goals and objectives of the Lower Genesee River Land
                           Use Plan which was reviewed and adopted by the Rochester City
                           Council in 1979. These goals and objectives include the development
                           of public physical and visual access to the river gorge, development
                           of passive recreational opportunities on the river, and preservation
                           of sensitive environmental features.

                     D.    Subarea C1 - Developed portion of the Upland Area

                           Within LWRP Subarea C1 (developed portion of the Upland Area), the
                           following land uses are recommended to be promoted, encouraged and
                           developed:

               LWRP SUBAREA Cl: DEVELOPED PORTION OF THE UPLAND AREA
                                            RECOMMENDED LAND USES


               GEOGRAPHIC SUBZONE                          RECOMMENDED LAND USES

               (C-1-A) Lake Avenue/Stutson Street Area Public walkway


                                                     IV-26









                                                         Marine-related      retail      support
                                                         facilities
                                                         Hotel
                                                         Parking
                                                         General retail facilities, including
                                                         restaurants.
                                                         Office research facilities
                                                         Housing

             (C-1-B) Remainder of the Upland Area        Public walkway
                                                         Hotel
                                                         Parking
                                                         General retail facilities, including
                                                         restaurants
                                                         Housing

                          Committee recommendations for LWRP Subarea C1 (developed portion of
                          the Upland Area) promote land uses that are compatible with and
                          enhance well-established development patterns in the upland area of
                          the LWRP boundary. The recommended land uses are also compatible
                          with existing zoning classifications.    Although specific sites or
                          locations for each of the recommended uses for this subarea have not
                          been established or identified, they can be accommodated by existing
                          city zoning regulations and site plan and environmental review
                          procedures. Proposed water-related commercial support facilities,
                          such as bait and tackle shops or boating and fishing supply stores,
                          along with retail establishments, were recommended within the Lake
                          Avenue/Stutson Street Subzone to help restore the economic viability
                          of that area, and link it to the multi-use waterfront development
                          projects proposed for the Port Authority and River Street sites.

                   E.     Subarea C2 - Buildable portion of the Upland Area

                          Within LWRP Subarea C2 (buildable portion of the Upland Area), the
                          following land uses are recommended to be promoted, encouraged and
                          developed:

                          LWRP SUBAREA C2: BUILDABLE PORTION OF THE UPLAND AREA
                                           RECOMMENDED LAND USES

             GEOGRAPHIC SUBZONE                          RECOMMENDED LAND USES

             (C-2-A) Boxart Street/Burley Road Area      Public walkway
                                                         Housing


             (C-2-B) Eastman Kodak/St. Bernard's         Parking
                          Seminary                       Office research facilities
                                                         Manufacturing facilities

                          Committee recommendations for  LWRP Subarea C2 (buildable portion of
                          the Upland Area) promote land uses and facilities that are

                                                     IV-27









                           compatible with and enhance existing, well-established development
                           patterns in this area.       The recommended land uses are also
                           compatible with existing zoning classifications. Any proposals to
                           construct new facilities or rehabilitate existing buildings at the
                           Eastman Kodak Company research laboratories at St. Bernard's
                           Semi nary wi 11 be revi ewed under exi sti ng s i te pl an and envi ronmental
                           review procedures and will conform with existing zoning regulations
                           and historic preservation requirements.

                     F.    Subarea D - River Harbor Zone and Lakefront Area

                           Within LWRP Subarea D (River Harbor Zone and Lakefront Area), the
                           following land uses are recommended to be promoted, encouraged and
                           developed:

                            LWRP SUBAREA D: RIVER HARBOR ZONE AND LAKEFRONT AREA
                                             RECOMMENDED LAND USES

               GEOGRAPHIC SUBZONE                          RECOMMENDED LAND USES

               (DI) Beach Avenue residential area          Public walkway
                                                           Housing

               (D2) Ontario Beach Park                     Public walkway
                                                           Swimming areas
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Museum
                                                           Picnicking areas
                                                           Outdoor entertainment
                                                           Festival site

               (D3) Lake Avenue     Estes Street area      Public walkway
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Parking
                                                           General retail facilities, including
                                                           restaurants
                                                           Housing
                                                           Field sports

               (D4) Port Authority site                    Marina
                                                           Public walkway
                                                           Boat docks
                                                           Boat launch
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Museum/Aquarium (Waterfront
                                                           Discovery Center)
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                      IV-28 Picnicking areas









                                                           Parki ng
                                                           Outdoor entertainment
                                                           Festival Site
                                                           Boatel

              (D5) River Street site                       Marina
                                                           Public walkway
                                                           Boat docks
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Hotel
                                                           Parking
                                                           Housing
                                                           Outdoor entertainment

              (N) Lake Avenue commercial area              Public walkway
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Hotel
                                                           Museum (Genesee Lighthouse)
                                                           Parking
                                                           General retail facilities, including
                                                           restaurants
                                                           Outdoor entertainment
                                                           Housing

              (D7) Petten Street area                      Marina
                                                           Public walkway
                                                           Boat docks
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Parking
                                                           Housing

              (N) Marina area                              Marina
                                                           Public walkway
                                                           Boat docks
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Parking
                                                           Cartop boat access

              (09) Summerville area                        Public walkway
                                                           Swimming areas
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Parking
                                                           Outdoor entertainment
                                                           Marina
                                                           Boat docks


                                                     IV-29









                                                           Housing

              (DIO) Railroad to Stutson Street             Marina
                       (east bank of river)                Public walkway
                                                           Boat docks
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Hotel/Boatel
                                                           Parking
                                                           Boat launch
                                                           Housing

              (D11) Stutson Street to Rattlesnake Point
                       (east bank of river)                Marina
                                                           Public walkway
                                                           Boat launch
                                                           Boat docks
                                                           Fishing areas
                                                           Parking
                                                           Water-related retail support
                                                           facilities
                                                           Housing

                           The land uses recommended for LWRP Subarea 0 (River Harbor Zone
                           and Lakefront Area) promote waterfront recreation, preserve or
                           enhance scenic views and vistas and other sensitive or unique
                           environmental areas, increase public access to the waterfront, and
                           do not conflict with existing land uses or development patterns.
                           The recommended land uses also help create a focus for waterfront
                           development and activity within the city's LWRP boundary. Many of
                           the uses can be developed through implementation of the Ontario
                           Beach Park Master Plan prepared by Monroe County, and the
                           comprehensive development plans prepared by the city for the Port
                           Authority and River Street sites. The land uses recommended      by
                           the committee for this subarea take advantage of the unique
                           development potential and recreational opportunities within the
                           shorezone on the lake and at the mouth of the river.

                           The vast majority of land uses proposed for this subarea do not
                           conflict with and are permitted and regulated by the existing
                           River Harbor (R-H) and Open Space (OS) Zoning Districts which
                           cover most of this area. The city undertook, however, as a part
                           of the completion of LWRP SECTION V: IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES, an
                           analysis of the existing River-Harbor Zoning District regulations
                           and site plan review procedures to determine if they were adequate
                           to address all of the land use, site plan, design and
                           environmental considera-tions of the committee's land use
                           recommendations. The results of that analysis are contained in
                           SECTION V.

                           The land uses recommended for Subarea D also address several of
                           the goals and objectives of the Lower Genesee River Land Use Plan

                                                      IV-30








                          which was adopted by the Rochester City Council in 1979. These
                          goals and objectives include the development of public physical
                          and visual access to the river gorge, development of passive
                          recreational opportunities on the river, and preservation of
                          sensitive environmental features.

                   G.     Subarea E - Industrial Areas

                          Within LWRP Subarea E (Industrial Areas), the following land uses
                          are recommended to be promoted, encouraged and developed:


                                    LWRP SUBAREA E: INDUSTRIAL AREAS
                                          RECOMMENDED LAND USES

             GEOGRAPHIC SUBZONE                          RECOMMENDED LAND USES

             (EI) Portland Cement Company                Public walkway
                                                         Fishing areas
                                                         Shipping
                                                         Parking
                                                         Manufacturing facilities

             (E2) Kodak Park                             Public walkway
                                                         Treatment facilities
                                                         Parking
                                                         Office research facilities
                                                         Manufacturing facilities

             (E3) RG&E Station 5 Power Plant             Public walkway
                                                         Fishing areas
                                                         Power generating facilities
                                                         Parking

             (E4) Tape-Con Site                          Water related retail support
                                                         facilities
                                                         Hotel/Bed and Breakfast Inn
                                                         Parking
                                                         Manufacturing facilities
                                                         Housing

             (E5) Weyerhauser                            Parking
                                                         Manufacturing facilities

                          Committee recommendations for  LWRP Subarea E (Industrial Areas)
                          promote land uses and certain  waterfront recreational activities
                          that are compatible with and enhance well-established development
                          in this portion of the LWRP boundary. The recommended land uses
                          are also compatible with existing zoning classifications. Much of
                          Subarea E is zoned for manufacturing or industrial use which
                          permits virtually all of the land uses listed above for this area.


                                                   IV-31









                            Although specific sites or locations for several of the recommended
                            uses for this subarea have not been established or identified, they
                            can be accommodated by existing city zoning regulations as well as
                            site plan and environmental review procedures.          Devel opment of
                            fishing areas and passive recreational opportunities along the river
                            will be promoted and encouraged by the city and could be implemented
                            through negotiations with various private industries or land owners.
                            Potential future redevelopment of the Tape-Con Site would proceed
                            based on the recommendations for this area contained in the River
                            Harbor Plan outlined later in this Section.      The city considers the
                            development of improved fishing access and      facilities at the RUE
                            Station 5 Power Plant and at the Portland Cement Company to be
                            particularly important.       Expansions of,     or modifications to,
                            existing industrial facilities or changes in     use proposed for these
                            areas will be reviewed by the city based on the LWRP policy
                            statements and land use recommendations outlined in this Section.



               5.     RECOMMENDED PROJECTS WITHIN THE LWRP


                     A.     Introduction

                            As noted earlier, the city has developed and proposed several major
                            projects within the LWRP boundary which are designed to address and
                            implement many of the LWRP policies outlined in SECTION 111, as well
                            as the specific land use recommendations contained in this Section.
                            These   project proposals      represent a significant amount of
                            investigation, research, evaluation and planning on the     part of city
                            staff and the CAC. The projects which are proposed as part of the
                            city's LWRP include:

                                   Development of a mixed-use, waterfront center
                                   festival site at the Port Authority site, along
                                   with enhancement of existing water-oriented
                                   recreational activities, commercial facilities
                                   and public access along the river and within
                                   Ontario Beach Park.

                                   Development of a mixed-use waterfront district
                                   within the     River   Street   site,    to   include
                                   enhancement    of   water-oriented      recreational
                                   activities and public access along the river,
                                   development of new housing, and rehabilitation of
                                   existing commercial facilities in the area.

                                   Development, in cooperation with Monroe County,
                                   of a boat launch facility, as well as adjacent
                                   public access and water-related recreational
                                   activities along the east bank of the river, just
                                   south of the Stutson Street Bridge.



                                                       IV-32








                                  Implementation,   in   cooperation with       Monroe
                                  County, of improvements in Durand-Eastman Park,
                                  Ontario Beach Park, Turning Point, Park, Seneca
                                  Park, Maplewood Park, and Lower Falls Park.
                                  Specific projects will include improvements in
                                  public access to the shorezone, enhancement of
                                  existing water-oriented recreational facilities,
                                  and    development     of    new     water-oriented
                                  recreational facilities.

                    B.     Development of the Port Authority Site

                           The city, in conjunction with a team of planning consultants,
                           investigated the land use potential and development constraints of
                           the Port Authority site located along the west bank of the Genesee
                           River, near Lake Ontario.       The city recognized that this site
                           offered a unique opportunity to develop a focus for the city's
                           waterfront areas that could attract visitors and tourists from
                           Rochester as well as from outside the metropolitan area. The site
                           could provide increased public access to the waterfront along with
                           a wide variety of water-oriented recreational activities and uses if
                           developed properly.

                           Existing uses on the site include 2 abandoned warehouses, a large
                           parking area, and a boat launch facility with 4 ramps located on
                           land owned by Monroe County at the southern end of the site. The
                           port site is immediately adjacent to a strip-commercial area along
                           Lake Avenue, to the west.

                           An extensive housing and boating market analysis was conducted as
                           part of the original planning process.          This information was
                           included in the consultant's final report entitled Rochester Port
                           and River Street Area Land/Use Marketability Study.          The study
                           revealed that:

                                  There was significant unmet demand for boat slips
                                  in the Rochester Harbor area, and for visitor
                                  boat slips in all

                                  areas along the south shore of Lake Ontario from Oak Orchard
                                  to Fair Haven;

                                  There was sufficient demand for upper-income
                                  housing within the Rochester area to support
                                  development of up to 100 new housing units on the
                                  port site; and

                                  There was sufficient market demand within the
                                  Rochester metropolitan area to support the
                                  development   of    a   festival   retail     center
                                  containing up to 75,000 square feet of space on
                                  the port site.

                                                       IV-33









                            An initial plan for the Port Authority site was prepared based on
                            this information as well as a detailed inventory and analysis of
                            land use characteristics and development constraints in the area.
                            This plan proposed the development of a public marina containing
                            180-200 boat slips, 100 units of for-sale housing, and a 60,000 -
                            75,000 square foot festival retail center on the port site, as well
                            as relocation of the County boat launch to another area, and
                            construction of 2000 parking spaces on land located west of Lake
                            Avenue.


                            The development plan was reviewed by city staff, the CAC and members
                            of the public.    After a careful analysis of the information and
                            statistics used to develop the plan, and consideration of comments
                            from the committee, a panel of developers, and several citizens
                            concerning the various aspects of the proposal, several key issues
                            or concerns surfaced including:

                                  Almost unanimous      public opposition to the
                                  construction of housing on the port site because
                                  of a desire to maintain a public and          not a
                                  private waterfront area;

                                  Questions regarding whether or not local      retail
                                  market conditions could actually generate     enough
                                  year-round sales volume to support a          75,000
                                  square foot festival retail center on the     site;

                                  Concerns    regarding    the   environmental      and
                                  neighborhood impacts- of relocating a large
                                  parking area for the proposed port site and beach
                                  facilities to an open area to the west of Ruggles
                                  Street, which is currently used as recreational
                                  open space; and

                                  Concerns regarding the cost and desireability of
                                  relocating the existing county boat launch to
                                  another site, and the inability to identify an
                                  acceptable relocation site.

                            In an effort to address these problems and concerns,        city staff
                            prepared three additional development scenarios for the     port site.
                            City staff and the CAC agreed that the objectives that      were to be
                            achieved in any new port plan should include:

                                  Promotion of tourism through the development of
                                  facilities focused on water-oriented recreation
                                  and water-enhanced special events, rather than
                                  through the creation of a major new festival
                                  retail marketplace;



                                                      IV-34








                                 Elimination   of  Potential    environmental    and
                                 neighborhood impacts on residential areas located
                                 to the west of the port site by greatly reducing
                                 the number of parking spaces to be relocated from
                                 the site to the baseball fields;

                                 Development of increased public access to and use
                                 of the waterfront and promotion of water-enhanced
                                 recreation through the maintenance of the
                                 existing county boat launch on the port site,
                                 expansion of launch parking facilities, and
                                 location of any new housing units off of the
                                 site;

                                 Preservation and enhancement of scenic views and
                                 vistas of Lake Ontario and the Genesee River;

                                 Restoration   and   utilization   of    significant
                                 historical structures located in the port area
                                 including the carousel,      bathhouse and Port
                                 Authority warehouse;

                                 Development of a dramatic entranceway or focal
                                 point at the Lake Avenue and Beach Avenue
                                 intersection, in order to- create a sense of
                                 arrival at a significant waterfront destination;
                                 and

                                 Incorporation of access for public transportation
                                 to and through the development site.

                          After  an evaluation of the additional development options prepared
                          for the port site, city staff and members of the CAC agreed on a new
                          conceptual design plan for the area.        It was al so agreed that
                          planning for and development of the Port Authority site should be
                          coordinated and integrated with similar activities underway for the
                          River Street site to the south and Ontario Beach Park to the north.
                          This approach would encourag'e the development of the beach and
                          riverfront area as a single, unified waterfront facility and major
                          recreational destination, and would help link many activities and
                          uses within the harbor area.

                          The new concept plan for the Port Authority site envisions
                          facilities that are focused around various water-related events and
                          activities. The plan includes the development of a small 75-slip
                          marina on the site that would provide accommodation for visitors
                          from other ports on Lake Ontario, dock space for tour and charter
                          boats, and would serve as the focal point for water-related events
                          such as the annual Trout and Salmon Derby and boat races.

                          The concept plan proposes that the existing 4-lane public boat
                          launch remain on property owned by Monroe County in the southern

                                                    IV-35









                          portion of the site, and that the boat launch parking area be
                          upgraded to provide spaces for 47 cars and 107 cars with trailers.
                          In addition, the plan proposes that the Port Authority (northern)
                          warehouse on the site be redeveloped for such potential uses as a
                          maritime museum, fishery center or aquarium, that could 'include a
                          restaurant or food service facility.

                          The concept plan includes a large, landscaped parking area within
                          the port site for visitors to Ontario Beach Park and the other site
                          facilities.   Permanent parking spaces would be maintained in the
                          area south of Beach Avenue, west of Lake Avenue and east of Estes
                          Street. As facilities and activities are developed at Ontario Beach
                          Park and the port site, the parking supply and demand situation
                          would be closely monitored by the city.

                          If additional parking became necessary, the city would investigate
                          various alternatives for either reducing demand or increasing the
                          supply of spaces. These alternatives could include the development
                          of off-site parking lots and the use of a bus shuttle system to
                          bring people into the area, new signage to direct vehicles, to
                          existing, underutilized parking areas, the use of parking fees, the
                          development of temporary, overflow parking, or the construction of
                          a parking garage on the port site.

                          The concept plan identified the area between Estes Street and
                          Ruggles Street, which is currently used as open space and a soccer
                          field, as one location where temporary, overflow parking will be
                          provided during special events or periods of peak park usage. The
                          use of this area for permanent parking in support of recreational
                          activities would be considered only if none of the alternatives
                          listed above proved to be feasible and if a detailed plan was
                          developed with neighborhood input.      Such a pl an would have to
                          consider adequate screening from adjacent residential uses,
                          management of the lot to limit negative impacts on surrounding uses,
                          and i denti f i cati on of how di spl aced recreati onal uses and open space
                          would be replaced or accommodated.

                          Vehicular and pedestrian conflicts that now occur at the Lake Avenue
                          and Beach Avenue intersection would be reduced or minimized in the
                          concept plan by rerouting beach-bound traffic off of Lake Avenue
                          into the port site at the Hincher Street intersection.       Vehicles
                          would be directed by signage to use the appropriate routes and
                          i ntersecti ons. A traf f i c ci rcul ati on study woul d be compl eted pri or
                          to the development of any changes to the existing circulation
                          patterns on public streets in the area.

                          As a result of the implementation of the concept plan outlined
                          above, the Port Authority site would be transformed into the "Lake
                          Ontario Maritime Centeru. The proposed schematic plan meets many of
                          the LWRP policy goals and statements contained in SECTION III as
                          well as the objectives agreed upon by city staff, CAC members and
                          citizens.   The plan would also implement the specific land use

                                                    IV-36








                           recommendations for the port site and Ontario Beach Park that are
                           contained in this Section. The plan promotes tourism, enhances the
                           city's image-as a recreation and waterfront attraction, strengthens
                           the economic base of the region, promotes public access to the
                           shorezone,    increases the amount       and type of water-related
                           recreational    activities    and    opportunities,    enhances     beach
                           accessibility and use for large numbers of people, and improves
                           overall pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the area.

                           A summary of the elements of the proposed Ontario Beach Park / Port
                           Authority Site Concept Plan is provided below.         KAP IV-4 on page
                           IV-39 illustrates the concept plan. This is a schematic plan that
                           represents development ideas in a conceptual manner only. Specific
                           elements and impacts of actual projects would be determined only
                           after detailed design, engineering and environmental studies were
                           completed.

                    C.     Summary of Ontario Beach Park / Port Authority Site Concept Plan
                           Components

                                  Ontario Beach Park (beach area, boardwalk, picnic
                                  pavilions, playground areas, Carousel, pedestrian
                                  access, open space and landscaping):

                                  Ontario Beach Park will be redeveloped to include a variety of
                                  new features as well as enhancement of existing facilities
                                  such as the historic Dentzel Carousel. A new boardwalk will
                                  be constructed to run east-west across the length of the park
                                  and to separate the park area from the sand beach. Existing
                                  picnic pavilions will be upgraded and several new pavilions
                                  will be built.       New pedestrian paths, playgrounds and
                                  landscaping will also be provided.

                                  Bathhouse:

                                  The existing bathhouse located adjacent to the sand beach at
                                  the western end of the park will be rehabilitated and
                                  developed for new uses.     Although the specific program for
                                  this facility has not been completely developed, new uses
                                  might include a small cafe-type restaurant or food concession
                                  area, water quality testing lab, changing rooms and restrooms,
                                  court games, and possibly a neighborhood recreation center
                                  and/or small community theatre.

                                  Performance pavilion:

                                  The existing performance pavilion will be removed and a new
                                  f aci I i ty wi 11 be constructed near the center of the park. The
                                  facility will provide grass seating and appropriate acoustics
                                  for performances by the Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra and
                                  smaller musical ensembles.



                                                      IV-37









                                 Marina (boat slips, marina support facility,
                                 display boat, pedestrian promenade, observation
                                 area) :                                                             0

                                 A new marina will be constructed within the existing Port
                                 Authority site, just north of the center warehouse. The new
                                 marina is designed to include approximately 75 slips which
                                 would be designated.for use by transient boaters. A limited
                                 number of permanent or semi-permanent slips may also be
                                 provided.   Forty slips within the marina would accommodate
                                 boats up to 25 feet in length.       Twenty-seven slips would
                                 accommodate boats from 26 to 39 feet in length. Eight slips
                                 would accommodate boats from 40 to 60 feet in length.        The
                                 marina will also be designed to accommodate a large display
                                 boat to function as a tourist attraction and as an enhancement
                                 to the ambience of the waterfront area.       A small support
                                 facility will be constructed near the marina, or as part of
                                 the reuse of the northern warehouse on the port site, as
                                 described below.

                                 Commercial develoDment along east side of Lake
                                 Avenue:

                                 The concept plan provides for the potential development of a
                                 limited amount of new commercial space along the eastern edge
                                 of Lake Avenue, north of Hincher Street.       This commercial
                                 development might include two new buildings that could provide
                                 from 13,000 to 25,000 square feet of commercial space. Access
                                 could be provided from Lake Avenue as well as from the port
                                 area to the east.

                                 Before development of this new commercial space could.take
                                 place, several potential impacts would be evaluated including
                                 general market conditions in the area, the aesthetic aspects
                                 of interrupting views to the river across the port site, and
                                 the general condition and viability of existing commercial
                                 development along the west side of the Lake Avenue corridor.

                                 Rehabilitation of existing warehouses:

                                 The existing northern warehouse on the Port Authority site is
                                 immediately adjacent to the Genesee River and will be
                                 rehabilitated as part of the concept plan.        Al though the
                                 specific program for this facility has not been developed, new
                                 uses could include such things as water-related information
                                 and educational display space,








                                                     IV-38

































                                                                                                              -#x IL W 17


                                                                                                                                                                                                         AK


                                                                                                         tiak
                                                                                                            IM.9 L@ I
                                                                        OVERFLOW        PARKIN@



                                                                                                             TAW
                                                                                                                                                                              m



                                                                      d.-At


                                                                                                                                                           ki-


                                                                                                                                                074







                                                                                                                                                                       AM

                                                                                                                                                                        VIC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ,us"




                                                                                                                                                                                   7-v




                                                                                                                       14:

                                                                                                         Au                                                             &












                                            flz.o.rl ohm, mKm r
                                             gig





                                                6mor wtt. Mot r
                                                                        io-w                                                                     rl
                                                                                                                                                    lww







                                                             oorP

                                                                                                                       17'




                                                                        "c-s





                                                                 @.IAIJ Iv


                                                                                                                                                        It




                                                                                                                 L;



                                                                                                                                         -Put"   f                t







                                                                                                                                             MAP      IV-2

                                                                             ONTU10 BEACH-PARK, PORT AUTHORITY                                        NITE      AnDAIVER STREET-REDEVELOPMERT
                                                                                                                                    M-M-COMERT PLAN








                                 a riverfront bar and restaurant, retail space, restrooms, a
                                 marina office, a boatel containing guest rooms for marina
                                 visitors, or even a local species aquarium. An area adjacent
                                 to this warehouse is proposed as a charter and tour boat
                                 boarding and landing area.

                                 A specific use for the existing southern warehouse on the Port
                                 Authority site has not yet been developed. However, retention
                                 of this structure for future activities is proposed in the
                                 concept plan. This structure, which is also adjacent to the
                                 river, could provide additional recreational space to
                                 accommodate small concerts and ethnic festivals, special
                                 waterfront events such as fishing derbies, boat shows, etc.,
                                 and other water-related activities.          A portion of the
                                 structure could be enclosed to accommodate winter festivals
                                 and activities and to reduce ambient noise levels. The actual
                                 design, environment and ambience of this future facility will
                                 complement the activities taking place- within the center
                                 warehouse structure as well as the entire waterfront area.

                                 Monroe County Boat Launch:

                                 The existing 4-ramp County boat launch facility located at the
                                 southeastern corner of the port site will remain as part of
                                 the new concept plan.      Parking for the facility would be
                                 upgraded and increased to provide spaces for 47 cars and 107
                                 cars with trailers. A new river surge control structure and
                                 park gazebo are proposed immediately adjacent to the boat
                                 launch.

                                 Pier and riverfront promenade:

                                 The existing pier along the western edge of the river is
                                 adjacent to the port site and beach area and has undergone
                                 extensive rehabilitation by the Army Corps of Engineers. In
                                 addition, a landscaped riverfront promenade is proposed as
                                 part of the overall concept plan for this area. The promenade
                                 would run north-south along the river, connecting the pier and
                                 beach area with the marina, the northern and southern
                                 warehouse structures, and the County boat launch.              The
                                 promenade will also be connected to the Genesee Lighthouse and
                                 the River Street development area further to the south.

                                 Parking areas and vehicular circulation:

                                 Parking for the facilities in the port area and Ontario Beach
                                 Park will     be   provided   in   four major     parking    lots.
                                 Approximately 1560 spaces would be provided as part of the
                                 concept pl an. Up to 650 cars coul d be accommodated i n parki ng
                                 areas south of Beach Avenue and west of Lake Avenue, including
                                 temporary overflow parking on the existing soccer field. Up
                                 to 890 cars could be accommodated in parking areas within the

                                                      IV-41








                              port site, east of Lake Avenue, based on a perpendicular
                              parking space layout.      An additional 24 spaces could be
                              provided adjacent to the bathhouse.         As noted earlier,
                              proposed parking at the County boat launch would accommodate
                              47 cars and 107 cars with trailers. The final location, size
                              and design of the parking facilities at Ontario Beach Park and
                              the port site will depend on the nature of the facilities and
                              events that are actually developed there over time.

                              Vehicular circulation within the port site will connect all of
                              the major facilities and parking areas. Ingress to the port
                              site from Lake Avenue will be provided via the existing boat
                              launch entry and an upgraded access road at the intersection
                              of Hincher Street and Lake Avenue. Egress from the port site
                              is provided via a one-way westbound portion of Beach Avenue.
                              Specific traffic circulation patterns for the parking areas
                              west of Lake Avenue will be determined as those faci.lities are
                              developed and only after a traffic study has been completed to
                              determine the extent of neighborhood impacts.

                              Landscaping and open space:

                              Landscaping and major open space areas are provided throughout
                              Ontario Beach Park, around the marina, and immediately to the
                              south of the existing warehouses, adjacent to the river and
                              the county boat launch.    The concept plan places particular
                              emphasis on landscaping of parking areas to minimize the
                              visual impact of large expanses of pavement and to screen
                              adjoining residential land uses. Landscaped pedestrian plazas
                              and sitting areas are provided at the intersections of Lake
                              and Beach Avenues as well as Hincher Street and Lake Avenue.
                              An entry arch or gateway is proposed at the major access -point
                              into the port site. The arch would be designed to recall a
                              similar structure that was constructed at the beach in the
                              early 1900's.

                  D.    Development of the River Street site

                        Initial planning and design work for the River Street site was
                        undertaken in conjunction with the preparation of the redevelopment
                        plans for the Port Authority site and Ontario Beach Park. The city,
                        assisted by a planning consultant and the CAC, investigated the land
                        use potential and development constraints of the River Street site
                        which is located along the west bank of the Genesee River, just
                        north of the Stutson Street Bridge.

                        The city recognized that this site, when combined with former
                        Conrail right-of-way property recently purchased by the city and
                        located along the river, also offered a unique opportunity to
                        develop a focus for the city's waterfront. This area could attract
                        visitors and tourists from Rochester as well as from outside the
                        metropolitan area. In addition, the site provided an opportunity to

                                                  IV-42








                            create a waterfront area with a unique neighborhood flavor or
                            ambience due to its relative seclusion and the nature of existing
                            land uses in this part of the shorezone.           The site could also
                            increase public access to the waterfront and could provide several
                            water-oriented recreational uses if developed properly.

                            As noted above, the railroad right-of-way which runs from Petten
                            Street north along the river to the existing Pelican Bay Marina is
                            now owned by the city and New York State and contains approximately
                            5 acres of land. Two smaller properties located at the northern end
                            of this right-of-way are also owned by the city.           The remaining
                            portion of River Street site is in private ownership. Existing uses
                            on the site include an historic railroad station, the Genesee
                            Lighthouse which is listed on the National Register of Historic
                            Places,    several    small    bars,    restaurants     and    commercial
                            establishments, small manufacturing facilities, as well as various
                            vacant structures.

                            The city developed an initial proposal to rehabilitate the River
                            street site and the five acre railroad right-of-way property
                            acquired from Conrail.         This development plan enhanced the
                            facilities and activities proposed for the Port Authority site and
                            created a unique and distinctive area along River Street that took
                            advantage of the riverfront location, existing buildings and reuse
                            opportunities.

                            The plan recommended that local demand for boat slips be addressed
                            through the development of about 200 new slips along the river, in
                            an area that.extends from the existing railroad swing bridge south
                            to the Petten Street extension. In addition, the plan proposed the
                            construction of a promenade or pedestrian path along the river that
                            would link the site with the port area to the north. The pedestrian
                            walkway would also provide access to new open space and picnicking
                            areas to be developed along the river. These areas would include
                            new picnic shelters and river overlooks.           Enhancements to the
                            Genesee Lighthouse and surrounding area that involve creation of
                            additional open space, a pedestrian connection to the river, and
                            additional parking areas, were included in the plan. Rehabilitation
                            of the existing railroad station into a unique riverside restaurant
                            was also proposed.      Finally, adaptive reuse of existing vacant
                            commercial structures in the area was envisioned as a major part of
                            the overall redevelopment of the River Street site.

                            This initial city plan for the redevelopment of the River Street
                            area was reviewed and analyzed by a consultant team that included
                            the landscape architects who prepared the Ontario Beach Park and
                            Port of Rochester Concept Plans described above.         This review was
                            undertaken as part of a study which produced a report entitled the
                            Ri ver Harbor Redevel opment Area Desi qn/Feasi bi 1 i ty Stud . The study
                            had as its overall objective, the preparation of a concept plan for
                            redevelopment of the large waterfront and upland area which runs


                                                       IV-43









                        from just south of the Port Authority site to Petten Street, between
                        Lake Avenue and the River.

                        As part of the River Harbor Redevelopment Project, the consultants
                        reviewed and analyzed historic data and existing development
                        characteristics and conditions within the study area, which included
                        the River Street site. They also identified significant development
                        issues affecting the study area (such as the proposed replacement of
                        the Stutson Street Bridge) and prepared a series of development
                        goals and objectives.      From this information, the consultants
                        developed a unified, thematic concept for the study area which
                        focused on the historic, turn -of -the- century Charlotte village.
                        Specific design standards and guidelines for building facades,
                        streetscapes, signage and site development were also prepared by the
                        consultants and were incorporated into the city's Zoning Ordinance
                        as described in    'SECTION V:   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES.      Finally,
                        schematic site plans for five redevelopment sites within the study
                        area were prepared that incorporated the land use recommendations of
                        the CAC for this area, as well as other data collected or developed
                        as part of the project. Portions of the River Harbor Redevelopment
                        Area Design/Feasibility Stud        final report, prepared by the
                        Reimann-Buechner Partnership, are included in the Appendices to the
                        city's LWRP.

                        The five redevelopment sites that were examined as part of the River
                        Harbor Redevelopment Area DesignIFeasibility Stud         included the
                        Pelican Bay Marina at the northern end of River Street along with
                        the ci ty-owned waterfront area between Pel i can Bay and Petten Street
                        (which includes the existing historic railroad station), the Genesee
                        Lighthouse site, the Tape-Con property at the northwest corner of
                        River Street and Latta Road, an infill site on River Street between
                        Stutson Street and Latta Road, and an infill site along the Lake
                        Avenue corridor.

                        The proposed redevelopment plan for the River Harbor Redevelopment
                        Area addresses many of the LWRP policy goals and statements
                        contained in SECTION III, as well as additional objectives that were
                        developed by city staff, CAC members and citizens. The plan also
                        implements the specific land use recommendations for the River
                        Street site that are contained in this Section. The plan promotes
                        tourism, enhances the city's image as a waterfront recreational area
                        and major waterfront attraction, strengthens the economic base of
                        the region, promotes public access to the shorezone, and increases
                        the amount and type of water-related recreational activities.

                        A summary of the elements of the proposed River Harbor Redevelopment
                        Area Concept Plan is provided below.         MAP IV-2 on page IV-39
                        illustrates the proposed concept plan.      This is a schematic plan
                        that represents development ideas in a conceptual manner only.
                        Specific elements and impacts of actual projects would be determined
                        only after detailed design, engineering and environmental studies
                        were completed.            IV-44









                   E.     Summary of River Harbor Area Concept Plan Components

                                Boat slips, T-Piers, dry-storage     facility and
                                river wall/rip-rap:

                                All of the area immediately adjacent to the river, from
                                Pelican Bay Marina south to Petten Street, will be developed
                                for approximately 215 boat slips. This would include finger
                                piers along the river north of the Stutson Street Bridge, and
                                T-piers along the river south of the bridge, near Petten
                                Street. Rip-rap will be emplaced or a new river wall will be
                                constructed along the length of the river in this area and in
                                conjunction with development of the boat slips, to prevent
                                shore erosion and to protect the dock -areas and on-shore
                                public facilities. Dry-storage facilities for up to 35 boats
                                will be provided at the Pelican Bay Marina site and within a
                                new structure located at the southern end of the study area
                                along the river.

                                River promenade and riverfront park:

                                A river promenade or pedestrian walkway will be constructed
                                along the river that will connect or link the River Street
                                area with the port site and Ontario Beach Park to the north,
                                as well as with potential future riverfront recreational
                                trails to the south. The walkway will provide a variety of
                                routes for pedestrians to follow through the area and will
                                include river overlooks, a fishing pier, gazebos, as well as
                                shelters and restrooms at several points along its length. A
                                small riverfront park will be constructed adjacent to the
                                river promenade at the northern end of the site that will
                                include picnic pavilions, landscaping, open space areas and
                                overlooks.

                                Railroad station:

                                The existing vacant railroad station located adjacent to the
                                river, just north of Stutson Street, will be rehabilitated for
                                use as a unique riverfront restaurant and/or bar. Landscaped
                                open space, a river overlook and an outdoor cafe or veranda
                                could also be developed as part of the restaurant.

                                Parking areas and vehicular circulation.-

                                      An access road and several linear parking areas will be
                                      .developed along the length of the riverfront portion of
                                      the site to provide adequate vehicular circulation and
                                      access to the boat slips, railroad station and other
                                      public facilities in the area.    The access road would
                                      connect with River Street, Latta Road and Petten Street.
                                      Approximately 490 new parking spaces will be provided
                                      throughout the concept plan. Some of the new parking

                                                   IV-45








                                      spaces will be provided as part of the development of
                                      new housing units and mixed-use buildings in the study
                                      area.


                                Adaptive use of commercial structures    and vacant
                                Tand infill: Several existing unique      commercial
                                structures along the west side of River Street
                                will be developed for adaptive reuse. New uses
                                for   these   structures   could    include marina
                                services,       marine-related          commercial
                                establishments, restaurants, a hotel, bed and
                                breakfast operations, and housing.      New housing
                                is proposed as infill development on vacant land
                                in the River Street/Stutson Street/Latta Road
                                area, and as part of the overall redevelopment of
                                the Tape-Con site. A total of 44 Townhomes and
                                20 apartments are proposed for development in the
                                study area as part of the River Harbor concept
                                plan.

                                Genesee Lighthouse:

                                      The area around the historic Genesee Lighthouse will be
                                      upgraded through the enhancement of scenic views and
                                      vistas in the area. This area will be upgraded through
                                      the   development    of    improved   access,     additional
                                      landscaped open space adjacent to the river, a
                                      pedestrian connection across existing railroad tracks to
                                      the river and to the port site, and a new parking and
                                      turn-around area at the end of Lighthouse Street.

                                Replacement and relocation of Stutson Street
                                iridge:

                                The Lake Ontario State Parkway (LOSP) is recommended to be
                                extended eastward through existing residential areas, across
                                Ri ver Street and over the Genesee Ri ver by means of a new I i ft
                                bridge to replace the existing Stutson Street Bridge.           To
                                minimize the impact on this residential area, it is
                                recommended that the center median be removed prior to
                                crossing Lake Avenue.

                                The   recommended     bridge    replacement    option     involves
                                construction of a 54-foot vertical clearance lift bridge which
                                would   cross   Lake   Avenue    at   a   signalized,     at-grade
                                intersection.    The four-lane road, with sidewalks and bike
                                paths for both  east and westbound traffic would cross River
                                Street with an  8-foot vertical clearance. A pedestrian ramp
                                or stair should be provided to allow bridge users to access
                                River Street directly. The new bridge should tie-in on the
                                west shore of the river to the existing bridge interface at
                                Pattonwood Drive. River Street should be severed at the Map

                                                    IV-46








                               IV-3 bridge interface and a cul-de-sac should be developed at
                               each end of the street.
                               The abutment of the old Stutson Street Bridge should be used
                               as a major river overlook with access provided from Stutson
                               Street and River Street, and from the westbank riverfront
                               trail system via a stairway or ramp system.

                               This recommended bridge replacement project will allow for the
                               development of the River Harbor Area, Ontario Beach Park and
                               Port Authority site in a manner consistent with the plans
                               outlined in this Section, by reducing or eliminating major
                               existing traffic congestion and circulation problems at the
                               Lake Avenue and Stutson Street intersections. The recommended
                               project will also permit development of appropriate land uses
                               in the vicinity of Stutson Street and River Street as outlined
                               in this Section.

                               Construction of Genesee River surge protection
                               structure:

                               The River Harbor Redevelopment Concept Plan requires that a
                               surge protection or surge control structure be constructed at
                               the mouth of the Genesee River, in order to eliminate the
                               significant wave surge problem in the river during northeast
                               storm events. This surge problem causes extensive damage to
                               boats and boat slips, undermines and erodes the existing
                               county boat launch area, and prohibits charter and pleasure
                               boat activity, fishing and water-sport events during many
                               storm or rough water periods throughout the year. Some of the
                               proposed boat slips and finger piers along the west bank of
                               the Genesee River, as well as the 75-slip transient marina
                               proposed as part of the Port of Rochester Redevelopment Plan,
                               may not be able to be constructed without such a surge
                               protection structure in the river.

                               The recommended project alternative for a river surge control
                               structure involves construction of a permanent Odog-legm
                               extension at the northern end of the west pier.            This
                               alternative would be constructed in a northeasterly direction
                               and would require additional river dredging to accommodate the
                               larger commercial river traffic. The city, County of Monroe
                               and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should work cooperatively
                               together to fund, undertake and complete a surge control
                               project that will eliminate or significantly reduce the surge
                               problem in the river.

                               Implementation of design standards / guidelines
                               Tor River Harbor area:

                               The River Harbor Area Redevelopment Concept Plan identified
                               two design themes that are to be implemented through design

                                                  IV-47








                              standards and guidelines within the study area.                 A
                              0 turn -of -the-century village"   theme wi 11    be devel oped
                              primarily along the Lake Avenue corridor, north of the Lake
                              Ontario State Parkway, and a uturn-of-the-century maritime
                              centerm theme will be developed primarily along River Street,
                              north of the Stutson Street Bridge.

                              Private development within the study area that meets certain
                              threshol ds or cri teri a del i neated i n the Ci ty Zoni ng Ordi nance
                              will be required to meet design standards and guidelines that
                              implement these thematic concepts.       City public projects
                              within the study area such as street reconstruction or
                              development of new public recreation facilities will be
                              required to meet the same design standards and guidelines
                              through the city's capital improvement program review and
                              funding process.

                 F.     Development of the Genesee River boat launch facilit

                        The city, in cooperation with Monroe County, and as part of the
                        preparation of its LWRP, investigated the development of a 4-ramp
                        boat launch and associated support facilities, to be located on the
                        east bank of the Genesee River, just south of Stutson Street. The
                        city supports the development of this water-dependent activity and
                        would provide leased access across city property as well as river
                        frontage to the County in order to construct the facility. Access
                        to the site could be obtained via Thomas Avenue, within the Town of
                        Irondequoit. The city will continue to work with Monroe County and
                        the Town of Irondequoit to evaluate specific site characteristics
                        and development constraints along the east bank of the river and in
                        other appropriate areas, in order to identify the most appropriate
                        site for this facility.    Support facilities that could be part of
                        the boat launch could      include pedestrian walkways and river
                        overlooks, picnic areas and open space, as well as accessory
                        parking.

                        The development of a boat launch facility along the east bank of the
                        river would help implement the specific land use recommendations for
                        this area that are contained in this Section. Such a facility could
                        promote tourism, strengthen the economic base of the river harbor
                        area, promote public access to the shorezone, and increase water-
                        related recreational activities along the river.           Appropriate
                        provisions for vehicular and pedestrian access to this proposed
                        facility should also be incorporated into any designs developed for
                        the Stutson Street Bridge replacement project.

                 G.     Development of various improvements to the LWRP public parks

                        The city, as part of the preparation of its LWRP, reviewed
                        comprehensive master plans prepared by Monroe County for the
                        ,redevelopment of five of the public parks located along Lake Ontario
                        or the Genesee River.     These parks include Durand-Eastman Park,

                                                  IV-48








                         Turning Point Park, Seneca Park, Maplewood Park, and Lower Falls
   0                     Park. All of these parks are owned by the city. Durand-Eastman,
                         Lower Falls, Seneca and portions of Maplewood Park are leased to
                         Monroe County which is responsible for their operation and main-
                         tenance.   Turning Point Park is under the direct control of the
                         city.

                         The city supports the major recommendations contained in the master
                         plans for the redevelopment of existing park facilities or the
                         construction of new park facilities within the LWRP boundary.
                         Specifically, the city supports the following park improvement
                         activities as a means of addressing or implementing appropriate LWRP
                         waterfront policies or specific land use recommendations:

                               Within Durand-Eastman Park:

                                      Redevelopment and enlargement of the beach area of the
                                      park through the construction of a seawall and/or
                                      groins, supplemented by a phased program of beach
                                      nourishment;

                                      Construction of a bathhouse in the beach area along with
                                      various safety facilities including lifeguard tower
                                      stations and buoys, lines and markers;

                                      Provision of additional, defined parking along Lake
                                      Shore Boulevard and suitable safe crossings between the
                                      beach area and the remainder of the park;

                                      Construction of a nature center and outdoor amphitheater
                                      within the park, along with sufficient accessory parking
                                      and support facilities; and



                                      Development of a system of hiking trails within the park
                                      that connect the proposed nature center, satellite
                                      nature study areas and wildlife study areas.

                               Within Turning Point Park:

                                      Development of cartop boat access to the river; and

                                      Enhancement of a pedestrian trail to the south and west,
                                      along an abandoned railroad bed (this pedestrian trail
                                      provides pedestrian access to the park from the south,
                                      at Lake Avenue).

                               Within Seneca Park:

                                      Maintenance, protection and enhancement of the original
                                      Olmstead plan and design for the park; development of

                                                   IV-49









                                    new pedestrian trails and overlooks within the park, and
                                    a general upgrading and expansion of the park zoo; and

                                    Acquisition of property located along the east bank of
                                    the Genesee River, opposite Turning Point Park, in an
                                    area of the river known as Rattlesnake Point (this
                                    acquisition could enlarge the land area of the park,
                                    increase passive recreational opportunities within the
                                    park, and protect extremely sensitive wetland areas and
                                    steep, wooded slopes along the river bank; this
                                    additional park area could be developed with hiking
                                    trails  for   potential   nature studies     or   similar
                                    activities).

                              Within Maplewood Park:

                              -     Construction of additional pedestrian trails and paths
                                    within the park;

                              -     Provision of adequate parking facilities to support the
                                    various recreational activities in the park;

                              -     Development of a connection between Lower Maplewood Park
                                    and an existing pedestrian trail along Bridgeview Drive;
                                    and

                              -     Development of safe, controlled fishing access to the
                                    Genesee River, in appropriate locations along the park's
                                    riverfront.

                              Within Lower Falls Park:

                                    Development   of the    park   as  an   archaeol ogi c
                                    interpretive site, focusing on the remains and ruins of
                                    former mill structures and other buildings in the area
                                    that date back to the early 18001s;

                                    Construction of several river overlooks within the park
                                    to enhance the scenic views and vistas of the gorge and
                                    falls area; and

                                    Construction of trail connections to Maplewood Park
                                    under the new Driving Park Bridge.


                              SUMNARY OF SECTION IV: USES AND PROJECTS

          The policies of the city's LWRP outlined in SECTION III were translated, with
          input from a citizen's advisory committee, into a conceptual development plan for
          the city's waterfront areas. This was accomplished by identifying appropriate
          land uses and projects for the following subareas within the LWRP boundary:


                                                 IV-50










                           Subarea   A  - Durand-Eastman Park
   0                       Subarea   B  - Open Space / Critical Environmental Areas
                           Subarea   C1 - Developed portion of the Upland Area
                           Subarea   C2 - Buildable portion of the Upland Area
                           Subarea   D  - River Harbor Zone and Lakefront Area
                           Subarea   E  - Industrial Areas

              The following generalized land uses are recommended for each LWRP subarea:

              SUBAREA                                  RECOMMEMDED LAND USES

              (A)   DURAMD-EASTMAM PARK         Public walkways, fishing areas, swimming areas,
                                                picnicking areas, parking, cartop boat access,
                                                spectator site for off-shore events, treatment
                                                facilities,      field     sports,     and      outdoor
                                                entertainment.

              (B)   OPEM SPACE L CRITICAL       Public walkways, fishing areas, picknicking
                    ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS         areas, parking areas, cartop boat access,
                                                swimming, outdoor entertainment, museum, and zoo.

              (CI)  DEVELOPED PORTION           Public walkways, marine-related support
                    OF THE UPLAND AREA          facilities, hotel, general retail facilities
                                                including      restaurants,       office     research
                                                facilities, parking, and housing.

              (C2)  BUILDABLE PORTION           Public walkway, housing, parking,
                    OF THE UPLAND AREA          office research facilities, and manufacturing
                                                facilities.

              (D)   RIVER HARBOR ZONE           Public walkways, swimming areas, fishing
                    AND LAKEFRONT AREA          areas, picnicking areas, outdoor entertainment,
                                                festival     sites,     field    sports,     marinas,
                                                marina-related support facilities, parking areas,
                                                cartop boat access, retail facilities including
                                                restaurants, hotel/boatel or bed & breakfast inn,
                                                and housing.

              (E)   INDUSTRIAL AREAS            Public    walkways,     fishing    areas,    parking,
                                                manufacturing     facilities,     power     generating
                                                facilities, office research facilities, water
                                                treatment facilities, shipping, water-related
                                                retail support facilities, hotel or bed &
                                                breakfast inn, and housing.











                                                       IV-51






   0













































                                  SECTION V: TECHNIQUES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAN






   0                                         CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                  LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

                      SECTION V: TECHNIQUES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM
                                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

              POLICY NUMBER                                                               PAGE

              NAP V-1      ZONING IN THE LWRP                                          V-5 to V-8

              POLICY 1     IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-9

              POLICY 2     IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-11

              POLICY  3    (not applicable)                                               V-12

              POLICY  4    (not applicable)                                               V-12

              POLICY  5    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-12

              POLICY  6    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-13

              POLICY  7    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-13

              POLICY  8    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-15

              POLICY  9    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-16

              POLICY  10   (not applicable)                                               V-18

              POLICY  11   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-18

              POLICY  12   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-19

              POLICY  13   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-20

              POLICY  14   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-21

              POLICY  15   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-22

              POLICY  16   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-22

              POLICY  17   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-23

              POLICY  18   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-24

              POLICY  19   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-24

              POLICY  20   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-25

              POLICY  21   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-26

              POLICY  22   IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-27


                                                     V-3









                    SECTION V: TECHNIQUES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM
                                       TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D.)

             POLICY NUMBER                                                               PAGE

             POLICY 23    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-28

             POLICY 24    (not applicable)                                               V-29

             POLICY 25    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-29

             POLICY 26    (not applicable)                                               V-30

             POLICY 27    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-31

             POLICY 28    (not applicable)                                               V-31

             POLICY 29    (not applicable)                                               V-31

             POLICY 30    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-31

             POLICY 31    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-32

             POLICY 32    (not applicable)                                               V-32

             POLICY 33    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-33

             POLICY 34    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-34

             POLICY 35    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-34

             POLICY 36    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-35

             POLICY 37    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-35

             POLICY 38    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-35

             POLICY 39    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-36

             POLICY 40    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-36

             POLICY 41    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-36

             POLICY 42    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-37

             POLICY 43    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-37

             POLICY 44    IMPLEMENTING TECHNIQUES                                        V-37

             TABLE V-1    SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTING  TECHNIQUES                            V-39

             SUMMARY OF TASK                                                             V-40

                                                    V-4



























                                  R-1
                                  3


                                                                    &L.



                     d



                     Az


























                                               Map V-1
                                          Zoning in the LWRP


                                                 V-5








                                                                                     N
                                                                                  -J&




                                                       0-5
                                                  M-1



                                                                O-S)


                                         O-S


                              'T
                                      I







                                                0-
                               O-S








                            T-P     M-2




                                               +
                                  W2
                        R-1     -2                               R-1
                             T-P


                                                           R-3                         do


                                                                                    R-3


                                                             pq m 1
                                                                            2%;;@jn



                                                   Map V-1
                                             Zoning in the LWRP


                                                     V- 6






                                                                                                        N












                                                                                                          SCmOOL
                                                                           3                  R-1



                                                                                                                    T



                                                                                               -77.

                      ARE
          R
                     --HL
                                                                                          Rq

                                                                  Mi                                   -mw--
                                               -F@6+-

                                                                  M-1
                                         -2
                         C-2
                                                                                              RmA
                                                    R 2
                                                                       2                       .......
                                                                               1;q
                                                                               ;
                                            -7-

                                                                                ALM
                                          R-4@2
             RgV-                                                        IR-2-                       7
             .1                                       -1-               -      -    -
                                   s                           7"-                                      f
                                                    C-f
                                                                                      2.


             E   R Tjï¿½N
                                                                     T.7
                                                                                                         'r- rr
                          -------                                                                                O-S
                       N                                                           :,Z:--
                                                                                         R
                                        A  U


                                                                        OPER
                                                                                           R-3
                                                                       UMAN JZENEWAL
                                                                               f


                                                                TV-
                    *+


                                                   4W     M.1
                               m   IF-B    0-      'RN




                                                                                           C' 4-\








                                                            map V- I
                                                      Zoninq in the LWPP


                                                               v..: 7









                                                                                                                    N



                                                            Ar







                                                                                                  0






                                                                                             zz@
                                                     IV                                   O-s

                                                     0 u q A N 0          EAST MAN












                                                                        O-S



                                                                                                                                  an

                                                                         as tvmwmm@






                                                                                                                            77'

                                                                       -4.


                                                                                                    Jv






                                                                                                               ----------



                                                                                               will..









                                               aw





                                                                  Map V-1
                                                           Zonina in the LWRP


                                                                    V- 8








             Map V-1, pages V-5 to V-8, depicts the zoning within the City of Rochester's
             waterfront revitalization area.

             The following material describes the legislation and additional actions
             implementing applicable LWRP policies.

             POLICIES (1). 0A), (IB), (IC), (101, (IE), (IF). (IG):

             (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THESE POLICIES:

                   The city considers its waterfront areas along Lake Ontario and the Genesee
                   River to be among its most important recreational, aesthetic and economic
                   resources. The city intends to revitalize and redevelop deteriorated and
                   underutilized waterfront areas by encouraging uses or activities deemed
                   appropriate for the waterfront revitalization area based on their water
                   and recreation-oriented characteristics.

                   Several city ordinances and legislation will help to implement the LWRP
                   policies listed above.    Much of the area within the LWRP boundary and
                   adjacent to the lake or river is zoned as an Open Space (OS) District.
                   This district will help to control and promote appropriate water-dependent
                   and water-enhanced uses within the shorezone by permitting parks, outdoor
                   recreational facilities, and natural wildlife areas.      In addition, such
                   uses as public and community recreation buildings, athletic fields, zoos,
                   .and small concessionaire shops incidental to the operation of public
                   recreational uses, are permitted subject to a special permit. The purpose
                   statement contained within the OS District includes references to the
                   preservation and enhancement of major open spaces and recreational areas
                   through protection of natural amenities and the encouragement of
                   development that is consistent with those natural amenities.

                   In addition, the City Zoning Ordinance contains comprehensive site plan
                   review procedures and requirements that will help to address development.
                   These requirements deal with aesthetic considerations, relationships to
                   surrounding land uses and environmental features, landscaping and
                   screening, as well as pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The city will
                   continue to utilize these zoning ordinance     provisions to encourage and
                   promote the development of appropriate commercial, industrial and
                   recreational uses within the LWRP boundary. The City Zoning Ordinance's
                   site plan review procedures are required for all development proposed on
                   sites located adjacent to the river and other types of development
                   activity.     These procedures include     the consideration of adequate
                   circulation, screening and landscaping, preservation of open space and
                   critical environmental areas, as well as   the relationship of the proposed
                   development to surrounding land uses and natural features.

                   The following changes made to the City's Zoning Ordinance as a result of
                   the LWRP implement the above policies:

                   (1)   The City's River Harbor (RH) District was modified to permit such
                          uses as housing, hotels, motels and boatels, and multiple or
                         mixed-uses, and to allow certain uses subject to special permit.

                                                    V-9









                 (2)    An Overlay Harbor Town Design (OHTD) District was adopted which
                        requires a certificate of design compliance, granted after a review
                        process based on design guidelines for landscaping, signage, visual
                        compatibility, site development, etc., for certain types of
                        development in the shorezone.

           (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THESE POLICIES:

                 (1)    The city prepared and will promote, in cooperation with other
                        governmental agencies, a redevelopment plan for the port site which
                        embraces the development policies of the LWRP. The proposed plan
                        includes construction of a marina for approximately 75 boats, a
                        public walkway adjacent to the river, redevelopment of two existing
                        warehouses for such uses as a restaurant, boatel, museum/ inter-
                        pretive center, related marine services, or a small festival site
                        which could be used for public events and performances or marina-
                        related commercial establishments. The goal of the proposed plan is
                        to encourage water7oriented and water-dependent uses on the site
                        that are compatible with existing land uses, to encourage private
                        investment on the site, and to improve the area's economic
                        stability.

                 (2)    The city prepared and will promote, with other governmental
                        agencies, a redevelopment plan for the River Street site which
                        embraces the development policies of the LWRP. The-proposed plan
                        takes advantage of the proximity of the site to the historic Genesee
                        Lighthouse, as well as the river and nearby marinas.        The plan
                        promotes water-related commercial and recreational uses@ in the area.
                        The plan includes redevelopment of the railroad station into a
                        unique waterfront restaurant, construction of boat slips and a
                        public walkway along the river, development of direct public access
                        to the Lighthouse, construction of picnic facilities and open space
                        areas along the river, and provisions for additional parking and
                        more efficient vehicular circulation in the area.      The plan also
                        identifies several buildings and structures in the area that could
                        be redeveloped or rehabilitated for appropriate water-related
                        commercial uses, and identifies new housing development sites.

                 (3)    The city will encourage and promote the development of commercial
                        and recreational uses along the Lake Avenue corridor, that will
                        support and enhance the land uses and development activities on the
                        port site and at Ontario Beach Park.           In addition to the
                        rehabilitation of major buildings, the city will promote the
                        provision of off-street parking areas and streetscape amenities such
                        as tree plantings, landscaping, street furniture and pavement
                        treatments as a part of public infrastructure projects in the area.

                 (4)    The city will promote and encourage, in cooperation with other
                        governmental agencies, the redevelopment of Durand-Eastman Park's
                        public beach area, located on Lake Ontario, immediately north of
                        Lakeshore Boulevard.   The city will continue to encourage Monroe
                        County to open the beach area to the public, and redevelop the

                                                  V-10








                           bathhouse and the adjacent beach in order to provide a suitable
                           recreational facility. This would provide city residents with a
                           second major publ i c beach area al ong the I ake. Support uses such as
                           small concession areas and public walkways should also be developed
                           by the county.

                    (5)    The city will promote and encourage, in cooperation with other
                           governmental agencies, the development of a public boat launch
                           facility along the eastern bank of     the river, just south of the
                           Stutson Street Bridge.      This area is largely vacant with the
                           exception    of   deteriorated    boat    slips   and     miscellaneous
                           marina-related uses and activities.    The facility will be developed
                           in conjunction with Monroe County and will help redevelop a severely
                           underutilized area of riverfront.      The boat launch will provide
                           increased public access to the river for boating, sailing and
                           fishing and will enhance other water-dependent and water-enhanced
                           uses in the area.

                    (6)    The city, in cooperation with Monroe County, will promote, encourage
                           and support the redevelopment of several recreational facilities
                           that are part of the six public parks located within the LWRP
                           boundary. These parks include Durand-Eastman Park and Ontario Beach
                           Park, which are located on Lake Ontario, and Turning Point Park,
                           Seneca Park, Maplewood Park and Lower Falls Park, which are located
                           on the river. Many of the parks' recreational facilities are in a
                           deteriorated condition and could be improved or enhanced through
                           construction of additional facilities such as pedestrian paths,
                           trails, river landings, parking areas and overlooks. The city will
                           ensure that public access to the waterfront is improved, and that
                           appropriate water-enhanced recreational uses are located in the
                           waterfront areas in each park.

              POLICY (2). (2A):

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                    The city recognizes that, because of the location of sensitive
                    environmental features in the shorezone and the general competition for
                    waterfront locations of various types of land uses, there is a limited
                    amount of waterfront land that is actually suitable for development within
                    the LWRP boundary. The city also recognizes that water-dependent uses and
                    activities should have priority over non-water-dependent uses in terms of
                    development within the shorezone of the waterfront revitalization
                    boundary. In order to ensure that water-dependent uses can be located and
                    devel oped i n waterf ront I ocati ons, the ci ty wi I I uti I i ze the OS Open Space
                    zoning district within the LWRP boundary.         The city will also avoid
                    undertaking, funding, or approving non -water -dependent actions or
                    activities when such actions or activities conflict with the development
                    of water-dependent uses or would preempt the reasonably foreseeable
                    development of water-dependent uses in the same area.



                                                      V-11








                 The OS Open Space District within the LWRP boundary includes areas along
                 the river south of Denise Road, as well as Ontario Beach Park and
                 Durand-Eastman Park. This district consists almost entirely of publicly-
                 owned land and only permits open space uses such as parks, playgrounds,
                 outdoor recreational facilities and some specially permitted uses. The
                 Open Space District basically restricts development in sensitive
                 environmental areas within the LWRP boundary. The open space uses that
                 are water-dependent and located in the shorezone are expected to remain
                 that way for the foreseeable future.

                 One change made to the City's Zoning Ordinance as a result of the LWRP
                 implements the above policies:

                 (1)   The River Harbor (RH) District was modified to include all areas
                       adjacent to the river, from Denise Road north to Lake Ontario, as
                       well as the Port and River Street sites.       This zoning district
                       promotes water-dependent uses through its list of permitted uses and
                       requirements for special permits for some of those uses.          The
                       district permits marinas, public boardwalks, boat launches, boating
                       and fishing docks, as well as harbor-related retail and consumer
                       service establishments. Most of the existing uses within the LWRP's
                       River   Harbor  District   are   expected   to   be  maintained    as
                       water-dependent facilities within the foreseeable future.

           (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THIS POLICY:

                 (1)   See (1), (2), (3), (4) and  (5) under (B) on pages V-10 and V-11.

           POLICIES (3). (4):      NOT APPLICABLE.


           POLICIES (5). (SA), (5B), (50:

           (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                 The city recognizes that new development proposed within the LWRP boundary
                 should be adequately serviced by existing or upgraded public services and
                 facilities.   Virtually all major development areas within the LWRP
                 boundary are serviced by adequate public services and facilities such as
                 vehicular access, storm and sanitary sewers, as well as electric, gas and
                 water lines.   If an area is not adequately serviced by existing public
                 services and facilities, then upgrades, improvements, or_extensions to
                 existing systems are usually possible.

                 The site plan review process contained in the City Zoning Ordinance
                 includes development review criteria which consider the adequacy of
                 service to development sites by such public services as storm and sanitary
                 sewers and access roads. The city intends to continue using this process
                 and these criteria to ensure that new development proposed within the LWRP
                 boundary is adequately serviced by public facilities.



                                                 V-12








             (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES:

                   (1)   See (1) under (8) on page V-1    0.   The port site is adequately
                         serviced with the public services and infrastructure that are
                         essential to the development of the proposed plan as outlined above.

                   (2)   See (2) under (B) on page V-10. The River Street site is adequately
                         serviced with the public services and infrastructure that are
                         essential to the development of the proposed plan as outlined above.

                   (3)   See (4) under (B) on page V-10.
                   (4)   As a part of the redevelopment of various county parks within the
                         LWRP boundary, the City will promote and encourage the improvement
                         of vehicular and pedestrian access to the parks and to the shorezone
                         itself.

             POLICY (61:

             (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                   The city recognizes the importance of efficient and uncomplicated permit
                   approval procedures for development activities proposed within the LWRP
                   boundary. The city has a permit review and approval system which includes
                   coordination with other local       and state agencies and eliminates
                   unnecessary or duplicative levels of review.

                   Site plan review is coordinated by the City Bureau of Zoning as are
                   requests for zoning variances, rezonings and subdivision approval.
                   Environmental impacts and other areas of special concern for proposed
                   development activities are considered early in the review process and are
                   investigated in conjunction with the City Office of Planning as well as
                   the City Environmental Commission. The entire development review process
                   is characterized by reasonable timetables and deadlines, relatively simple
                   and easy to understand paper work, and specific, but uncomplicated
                   development review standards.      A None-stop-shop" approach has been
                   developed by the city which allows applicants and/or developers to become
                   aware of permit procedures and requirements and obtain all necessary paper
                   work at one location at one time.

             POLICIES (7). (7A), (7B), (70:

             (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                   The city recognizes the need to preserve and protect significant fish and
                   wildlife habitat areas located within the LWRP boundary.      The New York
                   State Department of State (NYSDOS) has designated approximately six and
                   one-half miles of the Genesee River, from the river mouth to the Lower
                   Falls, as a Hfish and wildlife habitat of statewide significanceu. The
                   city will pursue a policy which preserves, protects and enhances this
                   habitat area.



                                                   V-13








                  The ci ty wi 11 conti nue to uti 1 i ze exi sti ng zoni ng di stri ct regul ati ons, as
                  well as site plan and environmental review procedures to ensure that
                  statewide and local ly-significant fish and wildlife habitat areas   within
                  the LWRP boundary are preserved and protected.

                  As noted in SECTION IV: USES AND PROJECTS, a large amount of the city's
                  waterfront area is publicly-owned parkland zoned as OS Open Space
                  Districts. Uses permitted within the OS District include parks, outdoor
                  recreational facilities, and natural wildlife areas.      In addition, the
                  purpose statement contained within the district includes references to the
                  preservation and enhancement of Rochester's major open spaces and
                  recreational areas through protection of natural amenities and the
                  encouragement of development which respects and is consistent with those
                  natural amenities. The restrictive nature of the Open Space District, in
                  terms of the types of land uses permitted and the development controls
                  that are included within it, will be utilized by the city to ensure that
                  development activities are undertaken in these areas in a manner
                  consistent with the maintenance and protection of wildlife habitat areas.

                  The City Zoning Ordinance's site plan review procedures are required for
                  all development proposed on sites located adjacent to the river as well as
                  for numerous other types or classifications of development activity. In
                  addition, development actions proposed within 100 feet of the Genesee
                  River and Lake Ontario, within areas zoned as open space, in heavily
                  wooded areas, and within state-designated freshwater wetlands are Type I
                  actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, since
                  these locations have been identified as critical environmental areas.
                  Such actions require a complete environmental review. As a part of the
                  site plan and environmental reviews, the city would determine and address
                  the project's potential impacts on existing fish and wildlife habitat
                  areas, and require mitigating measures, if necessary, in order to protect
                  those areas from adverse development impacts. City environmental review
                  procedures will be utilized to ensure that development activities that
                  have been determined to be Type I actions under this legislation will be
                  consistent with LWRP goals, policies and objectives including the
                  protection of significant fish and wildlife habitats, etc.

                  One change made to the City's Zoning Ordinance as a result of the LWRP
                  implements the above policies:

                  (1)   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted, which mandates the
                        consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies
                        and objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP
                        boundary.

           (B)    ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES:

                  (1)   The city, in cooperation with Monroe County, will promote, encourage
                        and support the redevelopment of several recreational facilities
                        that are part of the six public parks located within the LWRP
                        boundary. These parks include Durand-Eastman Park and Ontario Beach
                        Park which are located on Lake Ontario, and Turning Point Park,

                                                  V-14








                          Seneca Park, Maplewood Park and Lower Falls Park which are located
                          on the river.    Several of the proposed improvements will help
                          enhance the stability of existing fish and wildlife habitat areas
                          within the parks.

             POLICY (8):

             (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                    The city recognizes and will carry out the applicable local provisions of
                    the following state laws in order to implement this policy:

                    (a)   Industrial Hazardous Waste Management Act,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 27, Title 9)
                    (b)   State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 17, Title 8)
                    (c)   State Certification,
                          Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Section 401)
                    (d)   Toxic Substances Monitoring Program,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 17)
                    (e)   Substances Hazardous to the Environment,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 37)
                    (f)   Solid Waste Management,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 27, Title 7)
                    (g)   Control of Pollution Injurious to Fish and Shellfish,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 13-0345 and Article 17-0503)
                    (h)   Stream Pollution Prohibited,
                          Environmental Conservation Law (Article 11-0503)
                    (i)   Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Compensation,
                          Navigation Law (Article 12)
                    U)    Siting of Major Steam/Electric Generating Facilities,
                          Public Service Law (Article VIII)
                    (k)   Sanitary Code, Public Health Law (Article 3)

                    In addition, the city will utilize comprehensive site plan and
                    environmental review procedures in order to implement this LWRP policy.
                    These regulations are sufficient to deal with potential erosion,
                    sedimentation or other pollution problems which could adversely affect
                    fish and wildlife habitat areas within the LWRP boundary.

                    The City's site plan review procedures are required for all development
                    proposed on sites located adjacent to the Genesee River as well as for
                    numerous other types or classifications of development activity. These
                    site plan review procedures include the consideration of such items as
                    preser-vation of open space and critical environmental areas, as well as
                    the relationship of the proposed development to surrounding land uses and
                    natural features including fish and wildlife habitat areas.

                    Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the Genesee River and Lake
                    Ontario, within areas zoned as open space, in heavily wooded areas, and
                    within state-designated freshwater wetlands are Type I actions under the
                    City's Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, since these locations have

                                                   V-15









                 been identified as critical environmental areas.        City environmental
                 review procedures will be utilized to ensure that development activities
                 that have been determi ned to be Type I acti ons under thi s I egi sl ati on wi 11
                 be consistent with LWRP goals, policies and objectives including the
                 protection of significant fish and wildlife habitats, etc.

                 A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the consi-
                 deration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                 objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

           (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                 (1)    The city, in cooperation with Monroe County, will continue to
                        support and participate in a Combined Sewer Overflow Abatement
                        Project (CSOAP) which will eliminate combined storm and sanitary
                        sewers in many areas of the city.       This project involves the
                        construction of several large underground holding tunnels which will
                        discharge sewage and storm water, collected after major rainfalls,
                        to the Frank E. VanLare Treatment Plant located in Durand-Eastman
                        Park. Prior to the construction of these tunnels, large volumes of
                        combined sewage and storm water that occurred after major rainfalls
                        in the area flowed directly into the Genesee River and Lake Ontario
                        without being treated.     This sewage contributed to pollution
                        problems in the river and lake and the elimination or destruction of
                        fish and other wildlife species. The completion of the underground
                        holding tunnels will eliminate a major source of pollution discharge
                        into the river and lake and will help preserve existing stocks of
                        fish in the area.       In addition, the city will continue to
                        investigate and promote improvements to other portions of the city
                        storm and sanitary sewer systems in order to maintain and enhance
                        the existing water quality in the river and lake.

                 (2)    The city is participating, along with other governmental agencies,
                        in the development of a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for the Rochester
                        Embayment. A RAP is an agreement among federal, state, and local
                        governments, with the support of area citizens, on a plan to restore
                        the water quality and beneficial uses of the waters of the Area of
                        Concern.  The specific goal of the Rochester Embayment RAP is to
                        prepare an implementation plan that will improve the water quality
                        of Lake Ontario and all of the waterways that flow into it,
                        including the Genesee River. The implementation of the RAP for the
                        Rochester Embayment will help to protect fish and wildlife resources
                        from the introduction of hazardous wastes and other pollutants.

           POLICIES (9). OA), (gB):

           (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                 Much of the area located within the LWRP boundary and adjacent to Lake
                 Ontario or the river is currently zoned for open space use (OS District)
                 or river-harbor use (RH District).    The OS district regulations will be
                 utilized by the city to expand the recreational use of fish and wildlife

                                                 V-16








                     resources within the LWRP boundary by increasing access to existing
                     resources and by developing new resources.

                     Uses permitted within the OS Open Space District include parks, outdoor
                     recreational facilities, and natural wildlife areas. Development of these
                     types of uses will facilitate and promote the expansion of the
                     recreational use of existing fish and wildlife habitat areas by increasing
                     public access to these areas.          In addition, the purpose statement
                     contained within the OS Open Space District includes references to the
                     preservation and enhancement of Rochester's major open spaces and
                     recreational areas through protection of natural amenities and the
                     encouragement of development which respects and is consistent with those
                     natural amenities.      This statement is important and will be used to
                     interpret the intent of the district and help ensure that any proposed
                     development is consistent with the City's goals and objectives for
                     waterfront areas, including the expansion of recreational use of existing
                     fish and wildlife habitat areas.

                     One change made to the City's Zoning Ordinance as a result of the LWRP
                     implements the above policies:

                     (1)    The RH River Harbor District was modified to include a purpose
                            statement which includes references to the preservation and
                            enhancement of the recreational character of the harbor area at the
                            mouth of the Genesee Ri ver, the i mprovement of the vi sual qual i ty of
                            the harbor area, the preservation and promotion of public access to
                            the shoreline, and a new use list which permits such facilities as
                            marinas, boat launches and docks, and public walkways.

               (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THESE POLICIES:

                     (1)    See (6) under (B) on page V-11. Expansion of recreational fishing
                            opportunities will involve provision of direct public access to the
                            shoreline for fisherman as well as boaters.          Improvements wi 11
                            include the development of parking areas, access trails, fishing
                            piers and wharves and boating facilities in appropriate areas within
                            the parks. Provisions for increased public access to other wildlife
                            resources located within these parks will include the rehabilitation
                            or construction of hiking trails, pedestrian paths, overlooks and
                            shelters.

                     (2)    See (5) under (8) on page V-11.

                     (3)    The city will complete the acquisition of properties formerly owned
                            by Conrail and located along the east bank of the Genesee River,
                            opposite the Turning Basin.      These properties, which are located
                            within the Genesee River Gorge, contain areas of steep, wooded
                            slopes, and provide habitats for a wide variety of wildlife species,
                            including bird and deer populations, which should be preserved and
                            protected. The city will investigate the use of these properties
                            for development of a linear, passive recreational trail system along


                                                       V-17









                       the river that would increase public access to wildlife resources
                       within the river gorge.

                 (4)   The city will, when appropriate, encourage the state to continue and
                       expand its fish stocking program and will promote the completion of
                       studies by NYSDEC concerning habitat maintenance and improvement.
                       The city will insist that stocking programs are directed towards
                       areas where known habitats will support and enhance increased fish
                       populations.

           POLICY (10):             NOT APPLICABLE.


           POLICIES (11). (IIA), (IIB):

           (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                 The city recognizes the importance of        controlling or prohibiting
                 development in critical environmental areas  such as erosion hazard areas
                 and floodplains within the LWRP boundary.    Zoning regulations and other
                 land use controls are the primary means of dealing with these types of
                 problems.

                 Much of the area within the LWRP boundary that has been identified as
                 being within the Genesee River or Lake Ontario floodplain or that contains
                 steep slopes in excess of 15% is in public ownership and is zoned for open
                 space use. As noted earlier, the city's Open Space District effectively
                 prohibits development in these critical environmental areas by severely
                 limiting the types of uses and activities permitted. Lands zoned for open
                 space within the LWRP boundary will remain in their natural state and will
                 contribute to the enhancement, preservation and protection of other
                 features and characteristics in the waterfront area.

                 The city's rigorous site plan review procedures will also be utilized to
                 ensure that development activities will not cause or contribute to erosion
                 and/or flooding problems within the LWRP boundary. The City's site plan
                 review process is required for all development proposed on sites located
                 adjacent to the Genesee River as well as for numerous other types or
                 classifications of development activity. The site plan review procedures
                 include the considera-tion of such things as setbacks, lot sizes, erosion
                 control measures, impacts on existing drainage systems, as well as the
                 relationship of the proposed development to surrounding land uses and
                 natural features.    Site plans that do not adequately address erosion,
                 drainage or flooding problems will be denied or will be required to
                 include mitigating measures that will eliminate such problems.

                 If a development site is located in a designated floodplain, a special
                 permit is required which is reviewed and approved by the City Planning
                 Commission following a public hearing.    The special permit can only be
                 approved if the applicant demonstrates, among other items, that the
                 proposed development will be constructed above the base flood elevation at


                                                 V-18







                   @he particular location, and that the development will not cause or
                   increase flooding in the area or within the floodway in general.

                   The city will utilize existing environmental review procedures to ensure
                   that steep slopes and other areas prone to erosion as well as floodplain
                   areas within the LWRP boundary are protected.         Development actions
                   proposed within 100 feet of the Genesee River and Lake Ontario, in areas
                   zoned as open space, in heavily wooded areas, in state-designated
                   freshwater wetlands, and in areas with a slope of 15% or greater are Type
                   I actions under the City's Environ-mental Quality Review Ordinance. These
                   locations have been designated as critical environmental areas.         Such
                   actions will require a complete environmental impact review. This review
                   will be utilized to ensure that development activities that have been
                   determined to be Type I actions will be consistent with LWRP goals,
                   policies and objectives including the protection of steep slope areas and
                   erosion or floodprone areas.    As a part of this review, the city will
                   address the project's potential impacts on erosion, drainage and flooding
                   problems, and propose mitigating measures, if required, in order to
                   protect those areas from adverse environmental impacts.

                   Lands within the LWRP boundary that have been identified as coastal
                   erosion hazard areas by New York State include the shorezone along Beach
                   Avenue and Ontario Beach Park and a major portion of Durand-Eastman Park.
                   The beach areas contained within these shorezones have been identified as
                   natural protective features.    The City recognizes the need to regulate
                   development in these areas in order to protect existing resources from
                   lake flooding and erosion.

                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

             POLICIES (12). (12A):

             (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLEME)(TS THESE POLICIES:

                   The city will ensure that beach areas identified as natural protective
                   features on the State Coastal Erosion Hazard Map are preserved and
                   protected. The city considers these features to be critical  i environmental
                   areas that help protect certain inland coastal areas from flooding as well
                   as serious erosion problems.    Most of these areas are contained within
                   existing OS Open Space Zoning Districts.

                   The city will utilize existing environmental review procedures to ensure
                   that beach areas identified as natural protective features on the State
                   Coastal Erosion Nap are protected. Development actions proposed within
                   100 feet of Lake Ontario as well as in areas zoned as open space are Type
                   I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review Ordinance. These
                   locations have been designated as critical environmental areas.         Such
                   actions will require a complete environmental impact review.              In
                   coordination with this review, the city will address the project's overall
                   consistency with LWRP goals, policies and objectives as well as its

                                                   V-19








                   potential impacts on beach areas as well as erosion, drainage and/or
                   flooding problems. Mitigating measures, if required, will be proposed in
                   order to protect those areas from adverse environmental impacts.

                   As noted above, most of the beach areas identified as natural protective
                   features on the State Coastal Erosion Hazard Map are located within
                   existing OS Open Space Zoning Districts.        It is anticipated that lands
                   zoned for open space wi thi n the LWRP boundary wi 11 remai n i n thei r natural
                   state and will, therefore, contribute to the enhancement, preservation and
                   protection of existing beach areas.          Additionally, most development
                   activity that is permitted in Open Space Districts requires site plan
                   review and approval and/or City Planning Commission special permit review
                   and approval .   These review procedures will help ensure that proposed
                   development will have minimal adverse impacts on beach areas within the
                   LWRP boundary.

                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.


            POLICY (13). (13A):

            (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                   The city recognizes the importance of constructing and maintaining erosion
                   protection structures within the LWRP boundary which are designed to
                   reduce or eliminate erosion problems along the Genesee River and Lake
                   Ontario. The city will utilize existing review procedures to ensure that
                   such structures provide adequate protection and are properly designed,
                   constructed and maintained.

                   The city will utilize existing environmental and site plan review
                   procedures to ensure that erosion protection structures constructed within
                   the LWRP boundary have a reasonable probability of controlling erosion for
                   at least thirty years and will be properly designed and maintained.
                   Construction of such structures will require an environmental impact
                   review by the city because they will be located within 100 feet of the
                   Genesee River or Lake Ontario. Such activities are Type I actions under
                   the City's Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, since the 100 foot
                   "bufferm area has been identified as a critical environmental area. As a
                   part of this review, the city would be able to address the project's
                   potential impacts on erosion, and evaluate the ability of the structure to
                   control erosion for the thirty year period.

                   Additionally, construction of such structures along the river will require
                   site plan review and approval. This process will also be utilized by the
                   city to ensure that such structures are adequately designed, constructed
                   and maintained and will provide the necessary erosion control for the
                   desired thirty year period.



                                                     V-20








                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

            (B)    ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THESE POLICIES:

                   (1)   The city will work with Monroe County and the U.S. Army Corps of
                         Engineers (USACE) to encourage the maintenance of the east and west
                         piers located on Lake Ontario at the mouth of the Genesee River.
                         The west pier provides some erosion protection from high wind and
                         wave action for beach areas to the west and has probably contributed
                         to the deposition of additional material and the creation of a
                         larger beach area for Ontario Beach Park.     In addition, the city
                         will request, in cooperation with Monroe    County, that the USACE
                         investigate a significant surge problem    near the outl et of the
                         Genesee River and determine the need for and design of a potential
                         erosion control structure to be built within the river to eliminate
                         this problem.

                   (2)   The City will discuss with Monroe County the possibility of
                         constructing groins in the area of Durand-Eastman Park to control
                         erosion of the beach in that area. As noted in the discussion of
                         the various LWRP policies, waterfront recreational facilities
                         located within Durand-Eastman Park are proposed for significant
                         redevelopment and/or rehabilitation.      The development of such
                         erosion protection features will be evaluated in terms of their
                         overall costs and benefits as well as environmental impacts.


            POLICY (14):

            (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                   The city will utilize existing zoning procedures and land use regulations
                   to ensure that development within the LWRP boundary does not contribute to
                   erosion, flooding or drainage problems, either on-site or in other
                   locations.

                   The city will utilize existing environmental review procedures to ensure
                   that development proposed within the LWRP boundary, including the
                   construction of erosion protection structures, will not cause or
                   contribute to erosion or flooding problems. Development actions proposed
                   within 100 feet of the river and lake are Type I actions under the City's
                   Environmental quality Review Ordinance, since these areas have been
                   designated as critical environmental areas. Actions in these areas will
                   require a complete environmental impact review. As a part of this review,
                   the 'city would be able to address the project's potential impact on
                   erosion, drainage and flooding problems. The city could then require any
                   necessary mitigating measures in order to protect those areas and
                   surrounding development from adverse environmental impacts.



                                                  V-21








                 The city's rigorous site plan review procedures will also be utilized to
                 ensure that proposed development activities, as well as the construction
                 of erosion protection structures, will not cause or contribute to erosion
                 and/or flooding problems within the LWRP boundary. The City's site plan
                 review process is required for all development proposed on sites located
                 adjacent to the Genesee River as well as for numerous other types or
                 classifications of development activity. The site plan review procedures
                 include the consideration of such things as setbacks, lot sizes, erosion
                 control measures, impacts on existing drainage systems, as well as the
                 relationship of the proposed development to surrounding land uses and
                 natural features.   Site plans that do not ade-quately address erosion,
                 drainage or flooding problems will be denied or will be required to
                 include mitigating measures that will eliminate such problems.

                 A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                 consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                 objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

           POLICY (15):

           (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                 The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
                 regulates dredging, mining and excavation activities in shoreline and
                 wetland areas. These regulations are comprehensive in design and intent
                 and address actions according to their potential to interfere with the
                 natural coastal processes which supply beach materials, as well as the
                 potential for increasing erosion.

           POLICY (16):

           (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THIS POLICY:

                 None required or identified.

           (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THIS POLICY:

                 Although the city recognizes that public funds are often used for a
                 variety of purposes along the state's shoreline, it is the policy of the
                 city not to invest city funds in the construction, rehabilitation,
                 modification or maintenance of erosion protection structures for new or
                 proposed private development. The city will continue to cooperate with
                 other county, State and federal agencies to investigate the need for and
                 the possible construction of an erosion protection structure designed to
                 eliminate river surge problems within the Genesee River, using funds from
                 sources other than the city. The construction of such a structure would
                 reduce erosion damage and protect and enhance existing and proposed
                 marinas, boat launching ramps, and other commercial and recreational
                 facilities located along the river, near the outlet to Lake Ontario.




                                                 V-22










              POLICY (17). (17A):

              (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                     The city recognizes that such measures as structure siting, floodproofing
                     and elevation of buildings, the reshaping and vegetation of slopes, the
                     provision of drainage systems to reduce run-off that may weaken slopes,
                     and the retention of existing vegetation should be incorporated into the
                     early planning and review of projects within the LWRP boundary.           In
                     addition, other more complicated Nstructuralm techniques can be used to
                     minimize damage to natural resources and property from flooding and
                     erosion.   The city will utilize existing site plan and environmental
                     review procedures to ensure that these techniques are implemented where
                     necessary and appropriate within the LWRP boundary.

                     Much of the area within the LWRP boundary that is located along the top of
                     the riverbank, within a floodplain, or that contains steep slopes in
                     excess of 15% is in public ownership and is zoned for open space use.
                     Uncontrolled development in these areas has the potential for creating
                     serious erosion and/or flooding problems. As noted earlier, however, the
                     city's Open Space District prohibits development in these critical
                     environmental areas by severely limiting the types of uses and activities
                     permitted.   Lands zoned for open space within the LWRP boundary will
                     remain in their natural state and will contribute to the preservation and
                     protection of other features and characteristics in the waterfront area.

                     The city's site plan.review procedures will be utilized to ensure that
                     proposed development activities will not cause or contribute to erosion
                     and/or flooding problems within the LWRP boundary. The City's site plan
                     review process is required for all development proposed on sites located
                     adjacent to the Genesee River as well as for numerous other types or
                     classifications of development activity. The site plan review procedures
                     require the consideration of such things as setbacks, lot sizes, erosion
                     control measures, impacts on existing drainage systems, landscaping, as
                     well as the relationship of the proposed development to surrounding
                     natural features.    Non-structural methods of controlling erosion and
                     flooding problems can be investigated and/or required as a part of the
                     site plan review process.     Site plans that do not adequately address
                     erosion or flooding problems will be denied or will be required to include
                     mitigating measures that will eliminate such problems.

                     Development proposed within areas zoned as open space or within 100 feet
                     of Lake Ontario or the Genesee River are Type I actions under the City's
                     Environmental Quality Review Ordinance.      Such actions will require a
                     complete environmental impact review. In coordination with this review,
                     the city would evaluate the general consistency of the proposed action
                     with the goals, policies and objectives of the LWRP, as well as the need
                     for and the adequacy of structural as well as non-structural means of
                     erosion and flood protection within the project.




                                                     V-23









                  In addition, if a development site is located in a designated floodplain,
                  a special permit is required which is reviewed and approved by the City
                  Planning Commission following a public hearing. The special permit can
                  only be approved if the applicant demonstrates, among other items, that
                  the proposed development will be constructed above the base flood
                  elevation at the particular location and that the development will not
                  cause or increase flooding in the area or within the floodway in general.
                  Non-structural methods of minimizing damage to natural resources and
                  property from flooding could also be considered and/or required as a part
                  of this review process.

                  A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                  consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                  objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

            (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THESE POLICIES:

                  (1)   The city will continue acquisition of properties formerly owned by
                        Conrail located along the east bank of the Genesee River, opposite
                        the Turning Basin. These properties are located within the Genesee
                        River Gorge, contain areas of steep, wooded slopes, and also provide
                        habitats for a wide variety of wildlife species, including bird and
                        deer populations. Acquisition of this land by the city will help
                        ensure that development within certain areas of steep slopes or
                        within certain areas of the Genesee River floodplain, that may be
            POLICY (18): susceptible to erosion and/or flooding, will be prohibited.

            (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                  The city recognizes that proposed major actions undertaken by the city,
                  county, state or federal government, which would affect natural resources,
                  water levels and flows, hydroelectric power generation, recreational
                  facilities or that would cause significant shoreline damage, should be
                  reviewed and considered in terms of the overall social, economic and
                  environmental interests of the state and all its citizens.

            POLICIES (19). (19A), (19B), (19C), (190):

            (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THESE POLICIES:

                  The city recognizes the importance of increasing public access to
                  waterfront resources while considering the impacts that such access may
                  have on sensitive environmental features and wildlife habitats within the
                  shorezone. Although much of the land within the river gorge is in public
                  ownership, most of the areas that offer direct access to the river
                  shoreline and to existing recreational facilities are in private
                  ownership.   The city will utilize site plan and environmental review
                  procedures to ensure that public access to shore-zone recreational
                  resources is provided where appropriate and feasible within private
                  development projects.

                                                  V-24









                    The city's site plan review procedures and requirements will be utilized
                    to consider and review the feasibility of providing public access to
                    waterfront recreational areas through private development projects. These
                    procedures are required for all development proposed on sites located
                    adjacent to the river as well as for other types of development activity.
                    The type and amount of public access to the shorezone which is provided
                    within individual private development projects will be reviewed to ensure
                    that the physical use capacity of the recreational resource or facility is
                    not exceeded and that this access will accommodate the anticipated levels
                    of public use of the facility.

                    The city's environmental review procedures and requirements will also be
                    utilized to consider and review the feasibility of providing public access
                    to waterfront recreational areas through private development projects.
                    Development proposed within areas zoned as open space or within 100 feet
                    of Lake Ontario or the Genesee River are Type I actions under the City's
                    Environmental Quality Review Ordinance. Such actions require a complete
                    environmental impact review. As a part of this review, the city would
                    consider the feasibility and/or desirability of providing public access to
                    existing or proposed water-related recreational facilities or resources
                    such as beaches, marinas, fishing areas and waterfront parks. This access
                    would be evaluated in terms of type and adequacy during the review
                    process.

                    A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                    consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                    objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

              (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THESE POLICIES:

                    (1)   See (4), (5),, and (6) under (B) on pages V-10 and V-11.

                    (2)   See (3) under (B) on page V-17.

                    (3)   The city will work with Monroe County and the USACE to properly
                          maintain the east and west piers located on Lake Ontario at the
                          mouth of the Genesee River. This will ensure adequate public access
                          to the river and the lake for fishing and other passive recreational
                          activities.

              POLICIES (201, (20A), (20B), (20C). (20D). (20EI:

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT INPLENEKTS THESE POLICIES:

                    The city will attempt to facilitate access to publicly-owned areas of the
                    shorezone where the provision of such access is feasible and where it will
                    not endanger sensitive environmental features and wildlife habitats nor be
                    incompatible with adjacent land uses.    Guidelines for the provision or
                    development of such access which will be utilized by the city are
                    contained within the discussion of POLICY 20, in SECTION III: POLICIES.




                                                    V-25









                  The purpose statement of the city's River Harbor (RH) Zoning District
                  contains references to the provision of public access to the shorezone in
                  site development.    The city's site plan review procedures contain
                  standards or criteria for the adequate provision of pedestrian circulation
                  and access in site development.    The city's special permit procedures
                  contain standards which require site development to be in conformance with
                  the City Comprehensive Plan, and therefore, with the policies of the LWRP
                  that specifically relate to waterfront public access.

            (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES:

                  (1)   See (1), (2), (4), and (5) under (B) on pages V-10 and V-11.

                  (2)   See (3) under (B) on page V-17

            POLICIES (21). (21A), (21B), (210:

            (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                  The city recognizes the importance of facilitating the development of
                  water-dependent and water-enhanced recreational uses in appropriate
                  locations along the shoreline of the river and lake. Such water-enhanced
                  and water-dependent uses should be promoted within the context of both
                  public and private development projects.

                  Much of the area located within the LWRP boundary and immediately adjacent
                  to the lake or river is currently zoned for open space use (OS District).
                  The OS district regulations will help control and promote appropriate
                  water-dependent and water-enhanced recreational uses within the shorezone
                  of the LWRP boundary.

                  Uses permitted within the OS District include parks, outdoor recreational
                  facilities, and natural wildlife areas. In addition, such uses as public
                  and community recreation buildings, athletic fields, zoos, and small
                  concessionaire shops incidental to the operation of public recreational
                  uses are permitted subject to a special permit. The purpose statement for
                  the district includes references to the preservation and enhancement of
                  the city's major recrea-tional areas through protection of natural
                  amenities and the encouragement of development which respects and is
                  consistent with those natural amenities.

                  The River Harbor (RH) District, modified as a result of the LWRP, permits
                  such uses as housing, hotels, motels and boatels, multiple uses and
                  mixed-uses and certain other uses subject to special permit.

            (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES:

                  (1)   See (1), (2), and (6) under (B) on pages V-10 and V-11.





                                                  V-26










             POLICIES (22). (22A), (226):

             (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                    The city recognizes the need to promote and encourage, as a multiple use,
                    water-related recreational facilities within the LWRP, whenever such
                    recreational uses are compatible with existing demand and the primary
                    purpose of the overall development. Whenever actions or proposals involve
                    shorezone areas, the city will utilize site plan and environmental review
                    procedures to evaluate whether or not they should be considered for, and
                    required to incorporate appropriate recreational uses.

                    The city's site plan review procedures will be used to consider and review
                    the feasibility of providing water-related recreation, as a multiple use,
                    within public and private development projects. As noted earlier, site
                    plan review procedures are required for all development proposed on sites
                    located adjacent to the river as well as for numerous other types or
                    classifications of development activity. During the review process, the
                    city will evaluate whether or not the development of water-related
                    recreational facilities as multiple uses on particular sites adjacent to
                    the shore are appropriate and feasible

                    The R-H River Harbor District, modified as a result of the LWRP,
                    specifically permits certain multiple uses that include water-oriented
                    recreational facilities within the shorezone, subject to permit and to
                    appropriate conditions and standards.

             (B)    ADDITIONAL KIBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THESE POLICIES:

                    (1)   The city prepared and will promote, in cooperation with other
                          governmental agencies, a redevelopment plan for the port and River
                          Street sites which provides for water-related recreation, as part of
                          a multiple-use which is compatible with other land uses and
                          activities within the areas.         The proposed plan includes
                          construction of a small marina, development of a public walkway
                          immediately adjacent to the river, redevelopment of two warehouses
                          for use as a restaurant, boatel/motel, waterfront discovery center,
                          festival site or related marine services, rehabilitation of a
                          railroad station into a restaurant, and construction of picnic and
                          outdoor seating and viewing areas.      The proposed water-related
                          recreational uses are based on reasonably anticipated demand levels
                          for such activities determined during a lengthy inventory, planning
                          and analysis process undertaken by the city and outside consultants.

                    (2)   The city identified and will promote the development of several
                          water-related recreational uses and the improvement of public access
                          to the shorezone, that are located within existing industrial
                          facilities.    An example of such an opportunity would be the
                          improvement of public vehicular and pedestrian access, down Seth
                          Green Drive, to the RUE Station 5 Power Plant on the west bank of
                          the river, just north of the Driving Park Bridge. Improvement of
                          public access in this location would greatly enhance the area's use

                                                    V-27










                         by fishermen. Development of a fish-cleaning station could also be
                         considered. There are several other areas within the LWRP boundary
                         that provide significant vistas of the river gorge. These areas are
                         wi thi n pri vatel y-owned i ndustri al f aci 1 i ti es. The ci ty wi 11 attempt
                         to negotiate with private landowners the provision of public access
                         and the development of overlooks and rest areas within these areas.

            POLICIES (23). (23A), (23B), (230:

            (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                   The city recognizes the need for and places a high priority on the
                   identification and preservation of structures, sites,and districts within
                   the LWRP boundary that are significant in terms of the history,
                   architecture, archaeology or culture of the state or nation.

                   The city will utilize the site plan review and approval process to ensure
                   that full consideration is given to how development proposed within the
                   LWRP boundary "fitsm into existing historic areas.    Adverse impacts on
                   existing historic districts and structures, as well as on the historic
                   "characterm of many areas, will be minimized through the consideration of
                   the overall appearance and specific design and construction details of new
                   development during the site plan review process.

                   The city will utilize zoning overlay district regulations for historic
                   preservation to protect areas that may be designated as new preservation
                   districts or enlargements to existing districts within the LWRP boundary.
                   These designations would be the result of completion of historic surveys
                   by the Landmark Society of Western New York and the Rochester Museum and
                   Science Center. The districts may include buildings or structures that
                   have been identified for nomination to the National Register of Historic
                   Places and/or for consideration as locally-significant historic places.

                   Two changes made to the Cityl.s Zoning Ordinance as a result of the LWRP
                   implement the above policies:

                   (1)   The City's historic preservation regulations were modified to
                         include new, more specific standards for the designation of
                         landmarks and landmark sites.

                   (2)   An Overlay Harbor Town Design (OHTD) District was adopted, which
                         requires a certificate of design compliance, granted- after a review
                         process based on design guidelines for landscaping, signage, visual
                         and historic compatibility, site development, etc., for certain
                         types of new development in the shorezone.

             (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES:

                   (1)   The city prepared and will promote, in cooperation with other
                         governmental agencies, a redevelopment plan for the port and River
                         Street sites that preserves many architecturally and historically
                         significant structures in the area.     The plans are specifically

                                                   V-28






   0                       designed to protect and enhance these resources. A major element of
                           the proposed River Street concept plan is the enhancement of the
                           existing Ivillagem and unauticall character or ambience present in
                           the area.

                     (2)   The city will promote and encourage the preservation of several
                           archaeologically significant sites located in various public parks
                           and other areas along the river gorge. These sites include Carthage
                           Landing, located on the east bank of the Genesee River, just south
                           of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge, Kelsey's Landing, located on the
                           west bank of the river, below Maplewood Parki and an area near the
                           proposed Lower Falls Park, just south of the Driving Park Bridge
                           These areas contain historic remains of buildings and othe;
                           facilities that date back to the early 1800's.       The city will
                           promote and encourage, in cooperation with Monroe County, the
                           identification and protection of these areas as a part of
                           redevelopment plans prepared for each park.

                     (3)   As a result of the completion of historic surveys by the Landmark
                           Society of Western New York and the Rochester Museum and Science
                           Center, the city will prepare a list of structures within the LWRP
                           boundary that have the potential to be nominated to the National
                           Historic Register of Historic Places, will identify those structures
                           and facilities that have the potential for being designated as local
                           landmarks, and will evaluate the possibility of extending or
                           creating new preservation districts within the LWRP boundary.

              POLICY_C U4:       NOT APPLICABLE.


              POLICY (25). (25A), (25B), (250:

              (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                     The city will utilize zoning, site plan and environmental review
                     procedures to protect natural and man-made resources which enhance scenic
                     views and vistas within the LWRP boundary. These regulations will ensure
                     that proposed private development will not interfere with or destroy
                     existing natural or man-made features that contribute to the scenic
                     quality of the lake and the river.

                     As noted in previous LWRP policies, much of the area located within the
                     city's LWRP boundary and immediately adjacent to the lake or river is
                     currently zoned for open space use (OS District).            The district
                     regulations are adequate to prohibit or control most types of development
                     which would have a detrimental effect on significant scenic views and
                     vistas and other scenic resources within the LWRP boundary. The purpose
                     statement contained within the OS District includes references to the
                     preservation and enhancement of the city's major open spaces and
                     recreational areas through protection of natural amenities and the
                     encouragement of development which respects and is consistent with those
                     amenities.


                                                     V-29









                   Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the river and lake, within
                   areas zoned as open space, in heavily wooded areas, and within steep slope
                   areas are Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review
                   Ordinance, since these locations have been identified as critical
                   environmental areas. A complete environmental review, including a visual
                   resource inventory and analysis, would be required for projects proposed
                   in such areas. City environmental review procedures will be utilized to
                   ensure that development activities that have been determined to be Type I
                   actions under this legislation will not adversely affect significant
                   scenic views and vistas or other scenic resources within the LWRP
                   boundary.

                   The City's site plan review procedures are required for all development
                   proposed on sites located adjacent to the river as well as for other types
                   of development activity.        These procedures include such items as
                   preservation of open space and critical environmental areas, as well as
                   the relationship of the proposed development to surrounding land uses and
                   natural features including scenic views and vistas. These procedures will
                   ensure that significant scenic resources within the river gorge will be
                   identified and protected as a part of the review of development activity
                   within the LWRP boundary.

                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

             (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES:

                   (1)    The city will promote and encourage, in cooperation with Monroe
                          County and other governmental agencies, the development of
                          maintenance plans and measures to clean-up the riverfront area and
                          steep slopes within the gorge, in order to enhance visual quality.

                   (2)    The city, in cooperation with Monroe County, will encourage and
                          support the redevelopment of various recreational facilities that
                          are part of the six public parks located within the LWRP boundary.
                          These parks include Durand-Eastman Park and Ontario Beach Park which
                          are located on Lake Ontario, and Turning Point Park, Seneca Park,
                          Mapl ewood Park and Lower Fal I s Park whi ch are I ocated on the Genesee
                          River. The city will promote the development of trails, overlooks
                          and viewing areas in and around these public parks, in order to
                          provide increased viewing opportunities for park visitors of scenic
                          resources within the gorge area.


             POLICY (26):       NOT APPLICABLE.








                                                     V-30









              POLICIES (271, (27A):

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THESE POLICIES:

                    The only major energy facility that exists within the LWRP boundary is the
                    RUE Station 5 Power Plant and the adjacent Middle Falls Dam.           This
                    facility and use will continue at its present location for the foreseeable
                    future. However, if RUE ever does abandon the site, the city will use
                    site plan and environmental review procedures to ensure that an evaluation
                    of the best reuse for the site is completed.        This evaluation will
                    acknowledge the need to consider the compatibility of the new use with the
                    surrounding environment as well as the facility's potential need for a
                    shorefront location.

                    Site plan review and approval would be required for development proposed
                    within sites adjacent to the. river as well as for other types of
                    development activity. These procedures address preservation of open space
                    and critical environmental areas, as well as the relationship of the
                    proposed development to surrounding land uses and natural features. The
                    procedures will ensure compatibility of the proposed development with the
                    site's waterfront location.

                    Additionally, development actions proposed within 100 feet of the river
                    and lake, within areas zoned as open space. in heavily wooded areas, and
                    within steep slope areas are Type I actions under the City's Environmental
                    Quality Review Ordinance.     A complete environmental review would be
                    required for such projects. This review will ensure that such facilities
                    are developed in a manner that does not adversely affect the environment.

                    A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                    consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                    objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.


              POLICY (28):      NOT APPLICABLE.


              POLICY JU9 :      NOT APPLICABLE.


              POLICY (30):

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:
                    Site plan review and approval is required for development proposed within
                    sites adjacent to the river, as well as for other types of development
                    activity including manufacturing or industrial facilities that might
                    discharge materials or pollutants into the river or lake.              These
                    procedures address preservation of critical environmental areas, potential
                    creation of erosion or drainage problems, as well as the relationship of
                    the proposed development to surrounding land uses and natural features.


                                                    V-31









                   The procedures will ensure that the project does not adversely impact
                   water quality due to the discharge of pollutants or other materials.
                   Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the river and lake, within
                   areas zoned as open space, in heavily wooded areas, and within steep slope
                   areas are Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review
                   Ordinance, since these locations have been identified as critical
                   environmental areas. A complete environmental review would be required
                   for such projects. City environmental review procedures will ensure that
                   development activities that are Type I actions under this legislation will
                   not adversely impact water quality in the river or lake due to the
                   discharge of pollutants or other materials.

                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

             (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                   (1)   The city will continue to assist in and support the water quality
                         monitoring activities of the Monroe County Health Department and the
                         NYSDEC, to ensure that discharges into Lake Ontario and the Genesee
                         River comply with state and federal water quality standards.

             POLICY (31):

             (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                   Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the Genesee River and Lake
                   Ontario are Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review
                   Ordinance,   because this area has been identified as a critical
                   envi ronmental area. A compl ete envi ronmental revi ew woul d be requi red for
                   such projects. The city will use the environmental review procedures to
                   ensure that water quality impacts of stormwater runoff and -effluent
                   discharge from Type I development activities, as well as overall water
                   quality and pollution levels adjacent to such sites are considered and
                   evaluated prior to any project approval. The environmental review process
                   will also ensure that mitigating measures or project alternatives will be
                   required if adverse environmental impacts such as further degradation of
                   water quality should result. City environmental review procedures will
                   ensure that development activities that have been determined to be Type I
                   actions will not adversely impact water quality in the river or lake due
                   to the discharge of pollutants or other materials.

                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.


             POLICY (32):       NOT APPLICABLE.




                                                     V-32










              POLICY (33):

              (A)    LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                     Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the Genesee River and Lake
                     Ontario are Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review
                     Ordinance,  because these areas have been identified as critical
                     environmental areas. A complete environmental review would be required
                     for projects in these areas. The city will use the environmental review
                     process to ensure that best management practices (BNP1s) will be used to
                     control stormwater runoff and other effluent discharge from Type I
                     development activities.    The environ-mental review process will also
                     ensure that mitigating measures or project alternatives will be required
                     if adverse environmental impacts such as degradation of water quality
                     should result.

                     The following changes made to the City's Zoning Ordinance as a result of
                     the LWRP implement the above policies:

                     (1)   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                           consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies
                           and objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP
                           boundary.

                     (2)   Administrative procedures were adopted which will control site
                           development activities such as grading, filling, excavations,
                           stripping and removal of topsoil in coordination with a permit
                           review and approval process. The procedures will include standards
                           for permit approvals and will also mandate soil erosion and sediment
                           control measures for development activity, based on accepted
                           engineering standards as well as best management practices (B"Pls)
                           for stormwater runoff management.

              (B)    ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                     (1)   The city, in cooperation with Monroe County, is participating in the
                           Combined Sewer Overflow Abatement Program (CSOAP) which will
                           eliminate combined storm and sanitary sewers in many areas of the
                           city.   This project involves the construction of several large
                           underground holding tunnels which will discharge sewage and storm
                           water, collected after major rainfalls, to the Frank E. VanLare
                           Treatment Plant located in Durand-Eastman Park.        Prior to the
                           construction of these tunnels, large volumes of combined sewage and
                           storm water that occurred after major rainfalls in the area flowed
                           directly into the river and lake without being treated. This sewage
                           contributed to pollution problems in the river and lake and the
                           elimination or destruction of fish and other wildlife species. The
                           completion of the underground holding tunnels will eliminate a major
                           source of pollution discharge into the river and lake and will help
                           preserve existing stocks of fish in the area.



                                                     V-33









                   (2)   The city will continue to investigate and promote improvements to
                         other portions of the city storm and sanitary sewer systems in order
                         to maintain and enhance the existing water quality in the river and
                         lake. The improvements will be based on accepted best management
                         practices (BNP's) for stormwater runoff and drainage control.

            POLICY (3 ):

            (A)    LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THIS POLICY:

                   The city will enforce all existing and relevant building, sanitary and
                   health codes that apply to the discharge of sewage, waste and other
                   pollutants into local waters.

            (B)    ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLENENT THIS POLICY:

                   (1)   The city will promote and encourage, in cooperation with Monroe
                         County, the control and/or prohibition of discharges of waste
                         materials from vessels into coastal waters, in order to protect
                         significant fish and wildlife habitats, recreational resources and
                         water supply areas (counties in New York State may regulate such
                         activity under Section 46 of New York State Navigation Law).

                   (2)   The city will explore with Monroe County the possibility of
                         establishing no-discharge zones within the Genesee River and Lake
            POLICY (35): Ontario.

            (A)    LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THIS POLICY:

                   The NYSDEC issues dredging permits when it has been demonstrated that the
                   anticipated adverse effects of such operations have been reduced to levels
                   which satisfy state dredging permit standards as set forth in regulations
                   developed pursuant to the New York State Environmental Conservation Law.

                   Development activities proposed within 100 feet of the Genesee River and
                   Lake Ontario are Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality
                   Review Ordinance, because this area has been identified as a critical
                   environmental area. A complete environmental review would be required for
                   such projects.   The city will use the environmental review process to
                   ensure that the deposition of any dredge spoil materials within the LWRP
                   boundary is conducted in a manner which protects and preserves significant
                   fish and wildlife habitats, scenic resources, natural protective features
                   or wetl ands.   The environmental review process will also ensure that
                   mitigating measures or project alternatives will be required if adverse
                   environmental impacts such as destruction of significant habitat areas or
                   other existing natural resources should result.

                   A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                   consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                   objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

                                                    V-34










              POLICY (36):

              (A)    LEGISLATION THAT INPLEKENTS THIS POLICY:

                     The city will utilize the following State legislation as a means of
                     implementing this policy:

                     (a)   Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Compensation,
                           Navigation Law (Article 12)                  1
                     (b)   Penalties and Liabilities for Spills of Bulk Liquids,
                           Environmental Conservation Law (Article 71-1941))
                     (c)   Transportation Law (Article 2, Section 14-F)

                     These measures are considered adequate for the city because no activities
                     related to the shipment or substantial storage of petroleum or other
                     hazardous materials currently occur within the LWRP boundary, or will be
                     approved within the boundary in the foreseeable future.


              POLICY 1171:

              (A)    LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THIS POLICY:

                     Development actions proposed within 100 feet of the river and lake are
                     Type I actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review Ordinance,
                     because these areas have been identified as critical environmental areas.
                     A complete environmental review would be required for projects in these
                     areas. The city will utilize the environmental review process to ensure
                     that best management practices (BMP's) will be used to control the
                     non-point discharge of excess nutrients, organics and eroded soils from
                     Type I development activities. The environmental review process will also
                     ensure that mitigating measures or project alternatives will be required
                     if adverse environmental impacts such as degradation of water quality
                     should result.

                     See (1) and (2) under (A) on page V-33 for a description of changes made
                     to the City's Zoning Ordinance, which are a result of the LWRP, and which
                     implement the above policy.


              POLICY (38):

              (A)    LEGISLATION THAT INPLENENTS THIS POLICY:

                     None required or identified.

              (B)    ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLEKENT THIS POLICY:

                     (1)   The city's primary source of water is its Upland Watershed at
                           Hemlock and Canadice Lakes, and the Monroe County Water Authority
                           which uses Lake Ontario as its major water source.          The ci ty
                           recognizes and endorses the policy of the Monroe County Water

                                                     V-35









                        Authority, and will work with the appropriate regional monitoring
                        agencies to ensure that appropriate standards to implement this
                        policy are enforced.

            POLICY (39):

            (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                  None required or identified.

            (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                  (1)   There is currently no active transport, storage, treatment and/or
                        disposal of hazardous wastes within the city's LWRP boundary. In
                        addition, no land use or activity will occur within the waterfront
                        revitalization area that will produce such hazardous or solid
                        wastes, as defined in the Environmental Conservation Law, Article
                        27. However, the city will continue to work with the appropriate
                        monitoring and permit agencies to ensure that government standards
                        regarding disposal of such wastes are met.


            POLICY (40):

            (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                  None required or identified.

            (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                  (1)   The RG&E Station 5 power plant located on the east bank of the
                        river, near the Driving Park Bridge, and the Eastman Kodak Company
                        Industrial Waste Treatment Plant, located on the west bank of the
                        river, just north of the Veteran's Memorial -Bridge, are the only two
                        facilities within the LWRP boundary that are the types of uses
                        described in this policy. The city will continue to work with the
                        appropriate local, state and federal monitoring and permit agencies
                        to ensure that the water quality standards are being met and that
                        appropriate disposal methods are used.


            POLICY (41):

            (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                  Existing and proposed land uses within the city's LWRP boundary will be
                  restricted to residential, recreational and marine-related or supported
                  commercial facilities.     None of these uses are likely to produce
                  significant degradation of air quality in the area.         The NYSDEC has
                  jurisdiction over the monitoring of air quality to ensure that the
                  provisions of the Federal Clean Air Act are being met.


                                                  V-36










              POLICY (42):

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                    None required or identified.


              (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                    The policies of the State Coastal Management Program and Rochester LWRP
                    concerning proposed land and water uses and the protection and
                    preservation of special management areas will be taken into account prior
                    to any action to change prevention of significant deterioration land
                    classifications in coastal regions or adjacent areas.      In addition, the
                    NYSDOS will provide the NYSDEC with recommendations for proposed
                    prevention of significant deterioration land classification designations,
                    based upon State Coastal Management and Rochester LWRP policies.


              POLICY (43):

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEM ENT S THIS POLICY:

                    None required or identified.

              (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                    The New York State Coastal Management Program incorporates the State's
                    policies on acid rain. Therefore, the Coastal Management Program will
                    assist in the State's efforts to control acid rain.       These efforts to
                    control acid rain will enhance      the continued viability of coastal
                    fisheries, wildlife, agricultural, scenic and water resources.

                    There are currently no generators of significant amounts of acid rain
                    precursors located with the LWRP boundary and no opportunities exist for
                    new development which would include these generators.

              POLICY Lill:

              (A)   LEGISLATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS POLICY:

                    The city will utilize environmental review procedures and regulations to
                    ensure that wetlands as well as surrounding nbufferm areas are preserved
                    and protected within the LWRP boundary.      Development actions proposed
                    within 100 feet of the river and lake and within areas zoned as open
                    space, both of which  include all significant wetland areas along the river
                    and lake, are Type I  actions under the City's Environmental Quality Review
                    Ordinance, because    these locations have been designated as critical
                    environmental areas. Such actions will require a complete environmental
                    impact review.    As  a part of this review, the city would be able to
                    determine and address the project's potential impacts on existing fish and
                    wildlife habitat areas and other wetland features, and would propose

                                                     V-37









                 mitigating measures, if required, in order to protect those areas from
                 adverse development impacts.

                 A Waterfront Consistency Ordinance was adopted which mandates the
                 consideration of a project's consistency with LWRP goals, policies and
                 objectives as a criteria for review of projects within the LWRP boundary.

           (B)   ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE ACTIONS THAT INPLEMENT THIS POLICY:

                 (1)   The city will continue acquisition of properties formerly owned by
                       Conrail along the east bank of the river, opposite the Turning
                       Basin. These properties are located within or adjacent to the river
                       gorge, contain wetland areas and steep, wooded slopes and provide
                       habitats for a wide variety of wildlife species, including fish and
                       bird populations that should be preserved and protected. The city
                       will acquire these properties to preserve and protect existing
                       freshwater wetland areas as well as the scenic and aesthetic quality
                       of the river gorge in general.






































                                                 V-38






     0                                                               TABLE V-1
                                               LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
                                            SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION AND ADDITIONAL ACTIONS
                                                       WHICH IMPLEMENT LWRP POLICIES


                   LEGISLATION                                                   WILL IMPLEMENT THESE LWRP POLICIES

                   City Zoning Ordinance Open Space District                     1, 2, 7, 9,11, 12,17, 21, 25
                   City Zoning Ordinance Site Plan Review                        1, 5, 7,8,11,12,13,14,17,
                     Procedures                                                  18,19,22,23,25,27,30
                   City Code Chapter 48, Environmental                           8,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,
                     Review Process                                              25, 27, 30, 31, 33, 35, 37, 44
                   City 'one-stop-shop* permit procedures                        6
                   City floodplain/speciai permit regulations                    11,17
                   City Zoning Ordinance River Harbor
                     District                                                    1,2,9,20,21,22
                   City historic preservation regulations                        23
                   City Zoning Ordinance Oveday-Harbor
                     Town Design District                                        1,23
                   City Code Consistency Ordinance                               7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19,
                                                                                 25, 27, 30, 31, 33, 35, 37, 44
                   Administrative procedures with best                           33.37
                     Management practices (BMP's) for
                     runoff control


                   ADDITIONAL ACTIONS                                            WILL IMPLEMENT THESE LWRP POLICIES

                   Implement port site concept plan                              1, 2,5,20,21, 22,23
                   Implement River Street concept plan                           1, 2,5, 20, 21, 22, 23
                   Redevelop Lake Avenue corridor                                1
                   Redevelop Durand-Eastman Park                                 1, 2,5,19,20
                   Develop boat launch on Genesee River                          1, 2, 9,19, 20
                   Improve various county parks                                  1, 2. 5, 7, 9, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25
                   Participate in CSOAP                                          8.33
                   Participate in Remedial Action Plan (RAP)                     8
                   Acquire east bank riverfront land                             9,17,19, 20, 44
                   Encourage expanded fish stocking
                     programs                                                    9
                   Maintain east and west river piers                            13, 19
                   investigate groins at Durand Beach                            13
                   Improve public access in industrial areas                     22
                   Develop list of historic register properties                  23
                   Develop riverfront cleanup programs                           25
                   Support water quality monitoring activities                   30
                   Investigate storm/sanitary sewer
                     improvements                                                33
                   Investigate non-discharge zones in river                      34






                                                                         V-39










                             SUMMARY OF SECTION V: IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES

             Changes to the City of Rochester Municipal Code and Charter were made in order
             to i mpl ement many of the state coastal pol i ci es appl i cabl e to the LWRP. Some of
             the major changes are listed below.

                   (1)    Modification of the city's River Harbor (RH) Zoning District to
                          permit such uses as housing, hotels, motels and boatels, multiple
                          uses, and to allow certain uses subject to special permit.

                          Modification of the RH Zoning District purpose statement to include
                          references to the preservation and enhancement of the recreational
                          character and visual quality of the river harbor area, the
                          preservation and promotion of the public access to the shoreline and
                          the encouragement of tourism in the area.

                   (2)    Adoption of the Harbor Town Design Overlay District which requires
                          a certificate of design compliance for certain types of new
                          development in the shorezone, to be granted after a review process
                          based on design guidelines for landscaping, signage, visual
                          compatibility, site development, etc.

                   (3)    Adoption of administrative procedures which will control site
                          development activities such as grading, filling, excavations,
                          stripping and removal of topsoil in coordination with a permit
                          review and approval process. The procedures include standards for
                          permit approvals and also mandate soil erosion and sediment control
                          measures for development activity, based on accepted engineering
                          standards as well as best management practices (BMP's) for
                          stormwater runoff management.

                   (4)    Modification of a section of     the City Zoning Ordinance to include
                          specific standards for the designation of landmark sites.

                   (5)    Amendment to the Code of the City of Rochester to include a new
                          Waterfront Consistency Review Ordinance, which allows the city to
                          implement and administer the     consistency requirements of the New
                          York State Coastal Management    Program.

             Additionally, the city will undertake projects at the Port Authority site and the
             River Street site within the LWRP boundary, which will improve public access to
             the shorezone and to the water i tsel f , promote water-dependent and water-enhanced
             uses along Lake Ontario and the Genesee River, promote tourism and economic
             development, and contribute to the revitalization of the city's important
             waterfront areas.










                                                      V-40






   0

















































                       SECTION VI: STATE AND FEDERAL ACTIONS AND PROGRAMS LIKELY TO AFFECT
                                    IMPLEMENTATION



  0










                   INMODUCTION

                   State and federal actions will affect and be affected by implementation of
                   the City of Rochester's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)
                   Under State law and the U.S Coastal Zone Management Act, certain State ani
                   federal actions within or affecting the local waterfront area must be
                   "consistentu or "consistent to the maximum extent practicableu with the
                   enforceable policies and purposes of the LWRP.           This consistency
                   requirement makes the LWRP a unique, intergovernmental mechanism for
                   setting policy and making decisions, and helps to prevent detrimental
                   actions from occurring and future options from being needlessly
                   foreclosed.   At the same time, the active participation of state and
                   federal agencies will also be required in order to implement specific
                   provisions of the LWRP.

                   Subsection 2 of this Section identifies the actions and programs of State
                   and federal agencies which should be undertaken in a manner consistent
                   with the LWRP.     This is a generic list of actions and programs, as
                   identified by the HYS Department of State; therefore, some of the actions
                   and programs listed may not be relevant to the city's LWRP. Pursuant to
                   the State Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act (Executive
                   Law, Article 42), the Secretary of State individually and separately
                   notifies affected State agencies of those agency actions and programs
                   which are to be undertaken in a manner consistent with approved LWRPs.
                   Similarly, federal agency actions and programs subject to consistency
                   requirements are identified in the manner prescribed by the U.S. Coastal
                   Zone Management Act and its implementing regulations. The lists of State
                   and federal actions and programs included herein Are informational only
                   and do not represent or substitute for the required identification and
                   notification procedures. The current official lists of actions subject to
                   State and federal consistency requirements may be obtained from the NYS
                   Department of State.

                   Subsection 3 of this Section is a more focused and descriptive list of
                   State and federal agency actions which are necessary to further
                   implementation of the LWRP.     It is recognized that a State or federal
                   agency's ability to undertake such actions is subject to a variety of
                   factors and considerations; that the consistency provisions referred to
                   above may not apply; and that the consistency requirements can not be used
                   to require a State or federal agency to undertake an action it could not
                   undertake pursuant to other provisions of law. SECTION IV and SECTION V
                   also discuss, in general terms, State and federal assistance needed to
                   implement the LWRP.











                                                   VI-3










                  STATE AND FEDERAL ACTIONS AND PROGRANS WHICH SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN IN A
                  KANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE LWRP

            A.    State Agencies

                  OFFICE FOR THE AGING

                  1.00 Funding. and/or approval programs for the establishment of new or
                         expanded facilities providing various services for the elderly.

                  DEPARTNENT OF AGRICULTURE AND NARKETS

                  1.00   Agricultural Districts Program
                  2.00   Rural Development Program
                  3.00   Farm Worker Services Programs.
                  4.00   Permit and approval programs:

                         4.01 Custom Slaughters/Processor Permit
                         4.02 Processing Plant License
                         4.03 Refrigerated Warehouse and/or Locker Plant License

                  ALBANY PORT DISTRICT CONNISSION (regional agency)

                  1.00 Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                         activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                         of the Commission.

                  2.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL/STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY

                  1.00   Permit and Approval Programs:

                         1.01  Ball Park - Stadium License
                         1.02  Bottle Club License
                         1.03  Bottling Permits
                         1.04  Brewer's Licenses and Permits
                         1.05  Brewer's Retail Beer License
                         1.06  Catering Establishment Liquor License
                         1.07  Cider Producer's and Wholesaler's Licenses
                         1.08  Club Beer, Liquor, and Wine Licenses
                         1.09  Distiller's Licenses
                         1.10  Drug Store, Eating Place, and Grocery Store Beer Licenses
                         1.11  Farm Winery and Winery Licenses
                         1.12  Hotel Beer, Wine, and Liquor Licenses
                         1.13  Industrial Alcohol Manufacturer's Permits
                         1.14  Liquor Store License
                         1.15  On-Premises Liquor Licenses
                         1.16  Plenary Permit (Miscellaneous-Annual)
                         1.17  Summer Beer and Liquor Licenses
                         1.18  Tavern/Restaurant and Restaurant Wine Licenses
                         1.19  Vessel Beer and Liquor Licenses

                                                    VI-4











                            1.20  Warehouse Permit
                            1.21  Wine Store License
                            1.22  Winter Beer and Liquor Licenses
                            1.23  Wholesale Beer, Wine, and Liquor Licenses

                     DIVISION OF  ALCOHOLISM AND ALCOHOL ABUSE

                     1.00   Facilities, construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition
                            or the funding of such activities.

                     2.00   Permit and approval programs:

                            2.01  Letter Approval for Certificate of Need
                            2.02  Operating Certificate (Alcoholism Facility)
                            2.03  Operating Certificate (Community Residence)
                            2.04  Operating Certificate (Outpatient Facility)
                            2.05  Operating Certificate (Sobering-Up Station)

                     COUNCIL ON THE ARTS

                     1.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                            the funding of such activities.

                     2.00 Architecture and environmental arts program.

                     DEPARTMENT OF BANKING

                     1.00   Permit and approval  programs:

                            1.01  Authorization  Certificate   (Bank Branch)
                            1.02  Authorization  Certificate   (Bank Change of Location)
                            1.03  Authorization  Certificate   (Bank Charter)
                            1.04  Authorization  Certificate   (Credit Union Change of Location)
                            1.05  Authorization  Certificate   (Credit Union Charter)
                            1.06  Authorization  Certificate   (Credit Union Station)
                            1.07  Authorization  Certificate   (Foreign Banking Corporation Change
                                  of Location)
                            1.08  Authorization  Certificate   (Foreign Banking Corporation Public
                                  Accommodations Office
                            1.09  Authorization Certificate    (Investment Company Branch)
                            1.10  Authorization Certificate (Investment Company Change of
                                  Location)
                            1.11  Authorization Certificate (Investment Company Charter)
                            1.12  Authorization  Certificate   (Licensed Lender Change of Location)
                            1.13  Authorization Certificate (Mutual Trust Company Charter)
                            1.14  Authorization  Certificate (Private Banker Charter)
                            1.15  Authorization Certificate (Public Accommodation Office -
                                  Banks)
                            1.16  Authorization  Certificate (Safe Deposit Company Branch)
                            1.17  Authorization Certificate (Safe Deposit Company Change of
                                  Location)
                            1.18  Authorization  Certificate (Safe Deposit Company Charter)

                                                       VI-5









                          1.19   Authorization Certificate (Savings Bank Charter)
                          1.20   Authorization Certificate (Savings Bank De Novo Branch Office)
                          1.21   Authorization  Certificate (Savings Bank Public Accommodations
                                 Office)
                          1.22   Authorization Certificate (Savings and Loan Association
                                 Branch)
                          1.23   Authorization Certificate (Savings and Loan Association Change
                                 of Location)
                          1.24   Authorization Certificate (Savings and Loan Association
                                 Charter)
                          1.25   Authorization Certificate (Subsidiary Trust Company Charter)
                          1.26   Authorization Certificate (Trust Company Branch)
                          1.27   Authorization Certificate (Trust Company-Change of Location)
                          1.28   Authorization Certificate (Trust Company Charter)
                          1.29   Authorization Certificate (Trust Company Public Accommodations
                                 Office)
                          1.30   Authorization to Establish a Life Insurance Agency
                          1.31   License as a Licensed Lender
                          1.32   License for a Foreign Banking Corporation Branch

                    NEW YORK STATE BRIDGE AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                    1.00 Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                          activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                          of the Authority.

                    2.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                    BUFFALO AND FORT ERIE PUBLIC BRIDGE AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                    1.00 Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                          activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                          of the Authority.

                    2.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                    CAPITAL DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                    1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                          activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                          of the Authority.

                    2.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.


                    3.00  Increases in special fares for transportation services to public
                          water-related recreation resources.








                                                      VI-6









                     CENTRAL NEW YORK REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                     1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                           activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                           of the Authority.

                     2.00  Facilities construction,.rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                     3.00  Increases in special fares for transportation services to public
                           water-related recreation resources.

                     DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

                     1.00 Preparation or revision of statewide or specific plans to address
                           State economic development needs.

                     2.00 Allocation of the state tax-free bonding reserve.

                     DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

                     1.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                           the funding of such activities.

                     DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

                     1.00 Financing of higher education and health care facilities.

                     2.00 Planning and design services assistance program.

                     EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

                     1.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, demolition or
                           the funding of such activities.

                     2.00  Permit and approval programs:

                           2.01   Certification of Incorporation (Regents Charter)
                           2.02   Private Business School Registration
                           2.03   Private School License
                           2.04   Registered Manufacturer of Drugs and/or Devices
                           2.05   Registered Pharmacy Certificate
                           2.06   Registered Wholesale of Drugs and/or Devices
                           2.07   Registered Wholesaler-Repacker of Drugs and/or Devices
                           2.08   Storekeeper's Certificate

                     ENERGY PLANNING BOARD AND ENERGY OFFICE

                     1.00 Preparation and revision of the State Energy Master Plan.





                                                      VI-7











                   NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

                   1.00 Issuance of revenue bonds to finance pollution abatement modifica-
                         tions in power-generation facilities and various energy projects.

                   DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

                   1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                         activities related to the management of lands under the jurisdic-
                         tion of the Department.

                   2.00  Classification of Waters Program; classification of land areas under
                         the Cl ean Ai r Act.

                   3.00  Faci 1 i ti es constructi on, rehabi 1 i tati on, expansi on, or demol i ti on or
                         the funding of such activities.

                   4.00  Financial assistance/grant programs:

                         4.01   Capital projects for limiting air pollution
                         4.02   Cleanup of toxic waste dumps
                         4.03   Flood control, beach eros ion and other water resource projects
                         4.04   Operating aid to municipal wastewater treatment facilities
                         4.05   Resource recovery and solid-waste management capital projects
                         4.06   Wastewater treatment facilities

                   5.00  Funding assistance for issuance of permits and other regulatory
                         activities (New York City only).

                   6.00  Implementation of the Environmental Quality Bond Act of 1972,
                         including:

                         (a)    Water Quality Improvement Projects
                         (b)    Land Preservation and Improvement Projects including Wetland
                                Preservation    and   Restoration     Projects,   Unique     Area
                                Preservation Projects, Metropolitan Parks Projects, Open Space
                                Preservation Projects and Waterways Projects.

                   7.00 Marine Finfish and Shellfish Programs.

                   8.00  New York Harbor Drift Removal Project.

                   9.00  Permit and approval programs:

                         Air Resources

                         9.01   Certificate of Approval for Air Pollution Episode Action Plan
                         9.02   Certificate of Compliance for Tax Relief - Air Pollution
                                Control Facility
                         9.03   Certificate to Operate: Stationary Combustion Installation;
                                Incinerator; Process, Exhaust or Ventilation System
                         9.04   Permit for Burial of Radioactive Material

                                                    VI-8









                           9.05  Permit for Discharge of Radioactive Material to Sanitary Sewer
                           9.06  Permit for Restricted Burning
                           9.07  Permit to Construct: a Stationary Combustion       Installation;
                                 Incinerator; Indirect Source of Air Contamination; Process,
                                 Exhaust or Ventilation System

                           Construction Management

                           9.08 Approval of Plans and Specifications for Wastewater Treatment
                                 Facilities

                           Fish and Wildlife

                           9.09  Certificate to Possess and Sell Hatchery Trout in New York
                                 State
                           9.10  Commercial Inland Fisheries Licenses
                           9.11  Fishing Preserve License
                           9.12  Fur Breeder's License
                           9.13  Game Dealer's License
                           9.14  Licenses to Breed Domestic Game Animals
                           9.15  License to Possess and Sell Live Game
                           9.16  Permit to Import, Transport and/or Export under Section 184.1
                                 11-0511)
                           9.17  Permit to Raise and Sell Trout
                           9.18  Private Bass Hatchery Permit
                           9.19  Shooting Preserve Licenses
                           9.20  Taxidermy License

                           Lands and Forest

                           9.21  Certificate of Environmental Safety (Liquid Natural Gas and
                                 Liquid Petroleum Gas)
                           9.22  Floating Object Permit
                           9.23  Marine Regatta Permit
                           9.24  Mining Permit
                           9.25  Navigation Aid Permit
                           9.26  Permit to Plug and Abandon (a non-commercial, oil, gas or
                                 solution mining well)
                           9.27  Permit to Use Chemicals for the Control or Elimination of
                                 Aquatic Insects
                           9.28  Permit to Use Chemicals for the Control or Elimination of
                                 Aquatic Vegetation
                           9.29  Permit to Use Chemicals for the Control or Extermination of
                                 Undesirable Fish
                           9.30  Underground Storage Permit (Gas)
                           9.31  Well Drilling Permit (Oil, Gas, and Solution Salt Mining)

                           Marine Resources

                           9.32 Digger's Permit (Shellfish)
                           9.33  License of Menhaden Fishing Vessel
                           9.34  License for Non-Resident Food Fishing Vessel

                                                     VI-9











                         9.35  Non-Resident Lobster Permit
                         9.36  Marine Hatchery and/or Off-Bottom Culture Shellfish Permits
                         9.37  Permits to Take Blue-Claw Crabs
                         9.38  Permit to Use Pond or Trap Net
                         9.39  Resident Commercial Lobster Permit
                         9.40  Shellfish Bed Permit
                         9.41  Shellfish Shipper's Permits
                         9.42  Special Permit to Take Surf Clams from Waters other than the
                               Atlantic Ocean

                         Regulatory Affairs

                         9.43  Approval  - Drainage Improvement District
                         9.44  Approval  - Water (Diversions for) Power
                         9.45  Approval  of Well System and Permit to Operate
                         9.46  Permit -  Article 15, (Protection of Water) - Dam
                         9.47  Permit -  Article 15, (Protection of Water) - Dock, Pier or
                               Wharf
                         9.48  Permit -  Article 15, (Protection of Water) - Dredge or Deposit
                               Material in a Waterway
                         9.49  Permit - Article 15, (Protection of Water) - Stream Bed or
                               Bank Disturbances
                         9.50  Permit - Article 15, Title 15 (Water Supply)
                         9.51  Permit - Article 24, (Freshwater Wetlands)
                         9.52  Permit - Article 25, (Tidal Wetlands)
                         9.53  River Improvement District Approvals
                         9.54  River Regulatory District Approvals
                         9.55  Well Drilling Certificate of Registration

                         Solid Wastes

                         9.56  Permit to Construct and/or Operate a Solid Waste Management
                               Facility
                         9.57  Septic Tank Cleaner and Industrial Waste Collector Permit

                         Water Resources

                         9.58  Approval of Plans for Wastewater Disposal Systems
                         9.59  Certificate of Approval of Realty Subdivision Plans
                         9.60  Certificate of Compliance (Industrial Wastewater Treatment
                               Facility)
                         9.61  Letters of Certification for Major Onshore Petroleum Facility
                               Oil Spill Prevention and Control Plan
                         9.62  Permit - Article 36, (Construction in Flood Hazard Areas)
                         9.63  Permit for State Agency Activities for Development in Coastal
                               Erosion Hazards Areas
                         9.64  Permit for State Agency Activities for Development in Coastal
                               Erosion Hazards Areas
                         9.65  State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit
                         9.66  401 Water Quality Certification

                  10.00 Preparation and revision of Air Pollution State Implementation Plan.

                                                   VI-10









                     11.00 Preparation and revision of Continuous Executive Program Plan.

                     12.00 Preparation and revision of Statewide Environmental Plan.

                     13.00  Protection of Natural and Man-made Beauty Program.

                     14.00  Urban Fisheries Program.

                     15.00  Urban Forestry Program.

                     16.00  Urban Wildlife Program.

                     ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES CORPORATION

                     1.00 Financing program for pollution control facilities for industrial
                            firms and small businesses.

                     FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

                     1.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                            the funding of such activities.

                     OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES

                     1.00   Administration of the Public Lands Law for acquisition and
                            disposition of lands, grants of land and grants of easement of land
                            under water, issuance of licenses for removal of materials from
                            lands under water, and oil and gas leases for exploration and
                            development.

                     2.00   Administration of Article 4-B, Public Buildings Law, in regard to
                            the protection and management of State historic and cultural
                            properties and State uses of buildings of historic, architectural or
                            cultural significance.

                     3.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                     DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

                     1.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                            the funding of such activities.

                     2.00   Permit and approval programs:

                            2.01  Approval   of Completed Works       for Public Water Supply
                                  Improvements
                            2.02  Approval of Plans for Public Water Supply Improvements.
                            2.03  Certificate of Need (Health Related Facility - except
                                  Hospitals)
                            2.04  Certificate of Need (Hospitals)
                            2.05  Operating Certificate (Diagnostic and Treatment Center)
                            2.06  Operating Certificate (Health Related Facility)

                                                      VI-11










                         2.07  Operating  Certificate (Hospice)
                         2.08  Operating  Certificate (Hospital)
                         2.09  Operating  Certificate (Nursing Home)
                         2.10  Permit to  operate a Children's Overnight or Day Camp
                         1.11  Permit to  Operate a Migrant Labor Camp
                         2.12  Permit to  Operate as a Retail Frozen Dessert Manufacturer
                         2.13  Permit to  Operate a Service Food Establishment
                         2.14  Permit to  Operate a Temporary Residence/Mass Gathering
                         2.15  Permit to   Operate or Maintain a Swimming Pool or Public
                               Bathing Beach
                         2.16  Permit to Operate Sanitary Facilities for Realty Subdivisions
                         2.17  Shared Health Facility Registration Certificate

                  DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL and its subsidiaries             and
                  affiliates

                  1.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                  2.00   Financial assistance/grant programs:

                         2.01  Federal Housing Assistance Payments Programs (Section 8
                               Programs)
                         2.02  Housing Development Fund Programs
                         2.03  Neighborhood Preservation Companies Program
                         2.04  Public Housing Programs
                         2.05  Rural Initiatives Grant Program
                         2.06  Rural Preservation Companies Program
                         2.07  Rural Rental Assistance Program
                         2.08  Special Needs Demonstration Projects
                         2.09  Urban Initiatives Grant Program
                         2.10  Urban Renewal Programs

                  3.00 Preparation and implementation of plans to address housing and
                         community renewal needs.

                  HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY

                  1.00 Funding programs for the construction, rehabilitation, or expansion
                         of facilities.

                  2.00 Affordable Housing Corporation

                  INTERSTATE SANITATION COMMISSION (regional agency)

                  1.00 Adoption and enforcement of air and water pollution standards within
                         the Interstate Sanitation District.





                  JOB DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY



                                                   VI-12









                     1.00 Financing assistance programs for commercial            and industrial
                           facilities.

                     MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES FINANCING AGENCY

                     1.00 Financing of medical care facilities.

                     OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH

                     1.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                           the funding of such activities.

                     2.00  Permit and approval programs:

                           2.01 Operating Certificate (Community Residence)
                           2.02 Operating Certificate (Family Care Homes)
                           2.03 Operating Certificate (Inpatient Facility)
                           2.04 Operating Certificate (Outpatient Facility)

                     OFFICE OF MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES

                     1.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                           the funding of such activities.

                     2.00  Permit and approval programs:

                           2.01 Establishment and Construction Prior Approval
                           2.02 Operating Certificate Community Residence
                           2.03 Outpatient Facility Operating Certificate

                     METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                     1.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                           thefunding of such activities.

                     2.00 Increases in special fares for transportation services to public
                           water-related recreation resources.

                     DIVISION OF MILITARY AND NAVAL AFFAIRS

                     1.00 Preparation and implementation of the State Disaster Preparedness
                           Plan.

                     NATURAL HERITAGE TRUST

                     1.00 Funding program for natural heritage institutions.




                     NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (regional agency)


                                                      VI-13










                      1 - 00 Faci I i ti es constructi on, rehabi I i tati on, expans i on, or demol i ti on or
                             the funding of such activities.

                      2.00 Increases in special fares for transportation services to public
                             water-related recreation resources.

                      NIAGARA FALLS BRIDGE COMMISSION (regional agency)

                      1.00 Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                             activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                             of the Commission.

                      2. 00 , Faci 1 i ti es constructi on, rehabi I i tati on, expans i on, or demol i ti on or
                             the funding of such activities.

                      NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                      1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                             activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                             of the Authority.

                      2.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                             the funding of such activities.

                      3.00   Increases in special fares for transportation services to public
                             water-related recreation resources.

                      OGDENSBURG BRIDGE AND PORT AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                      1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                             activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                             of the Commission.

                      2.00   Faci I i ti es constructi on, rehabi 1 i tati on, expans i on, or demol i ti on or
                             the funding of such activities.

                      OFFICE OF PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION (including Regional
                      State  Park Commission)

                      1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement or other
                             activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                             of the Office.

                      2.00   Faci 1 i ti es constructi on, rehabi I i tati on, expans i on, or demol i ti on or
                             the funding of such activities.

                      3.00   Funding program for recreational boating, safety and enforcement.

                      4.00   Funding program for State and local historic preservation projects.

                      5.00   Land and Water Conservation Fund programs.


                                                            VI-14









                     6.00  Nomination of properties to the, Federal and/or State Register of
                           Historic Places.

                     7.00  Permit and approval programs:

                           7.01 Floating Objects Permit
                           7.02 Marine Regatta Permit
                           7.03 Navigation Aide Permit
                           7.04 Posting of Signs Outside State Parks

                     8.00  Preparation and revision of the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor
                           Recreation   Plan    and   the   Statewide   Comprehensive     Historic
                           Preservation Plan and other plans for public access, recreation,
                           historic preservation or related purposes.

                     9.00  Recreation services program.

                     10.00 Urban Cultural Parks Program.

                     PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY (regional agency)

                     1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                           activities. related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                           of the Commission.

                     2.00  Faci 1 i ti es constructi on, rehabi I i tati on, expans i on, or demol i ti on or
                           the funding of such activities.

                     3.00  Waterfront development project activities.

                     PORT OF OSWEGO AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                     1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                           activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                           of the Commission.

                     2.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                           the funding of such activities.

                     POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

                     1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                           activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                           of the Authority.

                     2.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.




                     ROCHESTER-GENESEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (regional agency)


                                                     VI-15









                    1.00  Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                          activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                          of the Authority.

                    2.00  Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, ordemolitionor
                          the funding of such activities.

                    3.00  Increases in special fares for transportation services to public
                          water-related recreation resources.

                    NEW YORK STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION

                    1.00 Corporation for Innovation Development Program.

                    2.00 Center for Advanced Technology Program.

                    DEPARTNEW OF SOCIAL SERVICES

                    1.00  Faci I i ti es constructi on, rehabi I i tati on, expansi on, or demol i ti on or
                          the funding of such activities.

                    2.00  Homeless Housing and Assistance Program.

                    3.00  Permit and approval programs:

                          3.01  Certificate    of   Incorporation    (Adult   Residential     Care
                                Facilities)
                          3.02  Operating   Certificate  (Children's Services)
                          3.03  Operating   Certificate  (Enriched Housing Program)
                          3.04  Operating   Certificate  (Home for Adults)
                          3.05  Operating   Certificate  (Proprietary Home)
                          3.06  Operating   Certificate  (Public Home)
                          3.07  Operating   Certificate  (Special Care Home)
                          3.08  Permit to   Operate a Day Care Center

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE

                    1.00  Appalachian Regional Development Program.

                    2.00  Coastal Management Program.

                    3.00  Community Services Block Grant Program.

                    4.00  Permit and approval programs:

                          4.01 Billiard Room License
                          4.02 Cemetery Operator
                          4.03 Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code


                    STATE UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION FUND



                                                    VI-16









                     1.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                            the funding of such activities.

                     STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

                     1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                            activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                            of the University.

                     2.00   Faci 1 i ti es constructi on, rehabi 1 i tati on, expans i on, or demol i ti on or
                            the funding of such activities.

                     DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES

                     1.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                            the funding of such activities.

                     2.00 Permit and approval programs:

                            2.01 Certificate of Approval (Substance Abuse Services Program)

                     THOUSAND ISLANDS BRIDGE AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                     1.00 Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                            activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                            of the Authority.

                     2.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                     NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY (regional agency)

                     1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                            activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                            of the Authority.

                     2.00   Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition.

                     3.00   Permit and approval programs:

                            3.01 Advertising Device Permit
                            3.02 Approval to Transport Radioactive Waste
                            3.03 Occupancy Permit

                     DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

                     1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement and other
                            activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                            of the Department.

                     2.00   Construction,    rehabilitation,    expansion,    or   demolition     of
                            facilities, including but not limited to:


                                                      VI-17









                         (a)    Highways and parkways
                         (b)    Bridges on the State highways system
                         (c)    Highway and parkway maintenance facilities
                         (d)    Barge Canal
                         (e)    Rail facilities

                  3.00   Financial assistance/grant programs:

                         3.01   Funding   programs    for   construction/reconstruction      and
                                reconditioning/preservation of municipal streets and highways
                                (excluding routine maintenance and minor rehabilitation)

                         3.02   Funding programs for development of the ports of Albany,
                                Buffalo, Oswego, Ogdensburg and New York

                         3.03   Funding programs for rehabilitation and replacement of
                                municipal bridges

                         3.04   Subsidies program for marginal branchlines abandoned by
                                Conrail

                         3.05   Subsidies program for passenger rail service

                  4.00   Permits and approval programs:

                         4.01   Approval   of    applications    for    airport     improvements
                                (construction projects)

                         4.02   Approval of municipal applications for Section 18 Rural and
                                Small Urban Transit Assistance Grants (construction projects)

                         4.03   Approval of municipal or regional transportation authority
                                applications   for   funds   for   design,   construction     and
                                rehabilitation of omnibus maintenance and storage facilities

                         4.04   Approval of municipal or regional transportation authority
                                applications for funds for design and construction of rapid
                                transit facilities

                         4.05   Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to Operate a Railroad

                         4.06   Highway Work Permits

                         4.07   License to Operate Major Petroleum Facilities

                         4.08   Outdoor Advertising Permit (for off-premises advertising signs
                                adjacent to interstate and primary highway)

                         4.09   Permits for Use and Occupancy of N.Y. State Canal Lands
                                (except Regional Permits [Snow Dumping])

                         4.10   Real Property Division Permit for Use of State-Owned Property

                                                   VI-18








                   5.00   Preparation or revision of the Statewide Master            Plan for
                          Transportation and sub-area or special plans and studies related to
                          the transportation needs of the State.

                   6.00   Water Operation and Maintenance Program--Activities related to the
                          containment of petroleum spills and development of an emergency oil-
                          spill control network.

                   URBAN  DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and its subsidiaries and affiliates

                   1.00   Acquisition, disposition, lease, grant of easement or other
                          activities related to the management of land under the jurisdiction
                          of the Corporation.

                   2.00   Planning, development, financing, construction, major renovation or
                          expansion of commercial, industrial, and civic facilities and the
                          provision of technical assistance or financing for such activities,
                          including, but not limited to, actions under its discretionary
                          economic development programs such as the 'following:

                          (a)   Tax-Exempt Financing Program
                          (b)   Lease Collateral Program
                          (c)   Lease Financial Program
                          (d)   Targeted Investment Program
                          (e)   Industrial Buildings Recycling Program

                   3.00 Administration of special projects.

                   4.00 Administration of State-funded capital grant programs.

                   DIVISION FOR YOUTH

                   1.00 Facilities construction, rehabilitation, expansion, or demolition or
                          the funding or approval of such activities.


             B.    federal Agencies

             DIRECT FEDERAL ACTIVITIES AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS


                   DEPARTMENT OF C014MERCE


                   National Marine Fisheries Services

                   1.00 Fisheries Management Plans


                   DEPARTNENT OF DEFENSE

                   Army Corps of Engineers




                                                   VI-19










                   1.00  Proposed authorizations for dredging, channel improvements, break-
                         waters, other navigational works, or erosion control structures,
                         beach replenishment, dams or flood control works, ice management
                         practices and activities, and other projects with potential to
                         impact coastal lands and waters.

                   2.00  Land acquisition for spoil disposal or other purposes.

                   3.00  Selection of open water disposal sites.

                   Army, Navy and Air Force

                   4.00  Location, design, and acquisition of new or expanded defense
                         installations (active or reserve status, including associated
                         housing, transportation or other facilities).

                   5.00  Plans, procedures and facilities for landing or storage use zones.

                   6.00  Establishment of impact, compatibility or restricted use zones.

                   DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

                   1.00 Prohibition orders.

                   GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

                   1.00 Acquisition, location and design of proposed Federal Government
                         property or buildings, whether leased or owned by the Federal
                         Government.

                   2.00 Disposition of Federal surplus lands and structures.

                   DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

                   Fish and Wildlife Service

                   1.00 Management of National WIldlife refuges and proposed acquisitions.

                   Mineral Management Service

                   2.00 OCS lease sale activities including tract selection, lease sale
                         stipulations, etc.

                   National Park Service

                   3.00 National Park and Seashore management and proposed acquisitions.


                   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                   Amtrak, Conrail                                                                     40
                                                   VI-20









                     1.00  Expansions,    curtailments,    new   construction,     upgrading    or
                           abandonments or railroad facilities or services, in or affecting the
                           State's coastal area.


                     Coast Guard

                     2.00  Location and design, construction or enlargement of Coast Guard
                           stations, bases, and lighthouses.

                     3.00  Location, placement or removal of navigation devices which are not
                           part of the routine operations under the Aids to Navigation Program
                           (ATON).

                     4.00  Expansion, abandonment, designation or anchorages, lightening areas
                           or shipping lanes and ice management practices and activities.

                     Federal Aviation Administration

                     5.00 Location and design, construction, maintenance, and demolition of
                           Federal aids to air navigation.

                     Federal Highway.Administration

                     6.00 Highway construction.

                     St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation

                     7.00 Acquisition, location, design, improvement and construction of new
                           and existing facilities for the operation of the Seaway, including
                           traffic safety, traffic control and length of navigation season.

              FEDERAL LICENSES AND PERMITS

                     DEPARTNENT OF DEFENSE

                     Army Corps of Engineers

                     1.00  Construction of dams, dikes or ditche's across navigable waters, or
                           obstruction or alteration of navigable waters required under
                           Sections 9 and 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.
                           401, 403).

                     2.00  Establishment of harbor lines pursuant to Section 11 of the Rivers
                           and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 404, 405).

                     3.00  Occupation of seawall, bulkhead, jetty, dike, levee, wharf, pier, or
                           other work built by the U.S. pursuant to Section 14 of the Rivers
                           and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 408).

                     4.00  Approval of plans for improvements made at private expense under
                           USACE supervision pursuant to the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1902 (33
                           U.S.C. 565).

                                                      VI-21










                   5.00  Disposal of dredged spoils into the waters of the U.S., pursuant to
                         the Clean Water Act, Section 404, (33 U.S.C. 1344).

                   6.00  All actions for which permits are required pursuant to Section 103
                         of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
                         U.S.C. 1413).

                   7.00  Construction of artificial islands and fixed structures in Long
                         Island Sound pursuant to Section 4(f) of the River and Harbors Act
                         of 1912 (33 U.S.C.).

                   DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

                   Economic Regulatory Commission

                   1.00 Regulation of gas pipelines, and licensing of import or export of
                         natural gas pursuant to the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717) and the
                         Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.

                   2.00 Exemptions from prohibition orders.

                   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

                   3.00  Licenses for non-Federal       hydroelectric projects and primary
                         transmission lines under Sections 3(11), 4(e) and 15 of the Federal
                         Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796(11)   ' 797(11) and 808).

                   4.00  Orders for interconnection of electric transmission facilities under
                         Section 202(b) of the Federal Power Act (15 U.S.C. 824a(b)).

                   5.00  Certificates for the construction and operation of interstate
                         natural gas pipeline facilities, including both pipelines and
                         terminal facilities under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15
                         U.S.C. 717f(c)).

                   6.00  Permission and approval for the abandonment of natural gas pipeline
                         facilities under Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C.
                         717f(b)).

                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                   1.00  NPDES permits and other permits for Federal - installations,
                         discharges in contiguous zones and ocean waters, sludge runoff and
                         aquaculture permits pursuant to Section 401, 402, 403, 405, and 318
                         of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1341,
                         1342, 1343, and 1328).

                   2.00  Permits pursuant to the Resources Recovery and Conservation Act of
                         1976.





                                                    VI-22









                    3.00 Permits pursuant to the underground injection control program under
                           Section 1424 of the Safe Water Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h-
                           c).

                    4.00 Permits pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1857).

                    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

                    Fish and Wildlife Services

                    1.00 Endangered species permits pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
                           (16 U.S.C. 153(a)).

                    Mineral Management Service

                    2.00   Permits to drill, rights of use and easements for construction and
                           maintenance of pipelines, gathering and flow lines and associated
                           structures pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1334, exploration and development
                           plans, and any other permits or authorizations granted for
                           activities described in detail in OCS exploration, development, and
                           production plans.

                    3.00   Permits required for pipelines crossing federal lands, including OCS
                           lands, and associated activities pursuant to the OCS Lands Act (43
                           U.S.C. 1334) and 43 U.S.C. 931 (c) and 20 U.S.C. 185.

                    INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

                    1.00 Authority to abandon railway lines (to the extent that the
                           abandonment involves removal of trackage and disposition of right-
                           of-way); authority to construct railroads; authority to construct
                           coal slurry pipelines.

                    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

                    1.00 Licensing and certification of the siting, construction and
                           operation of nuclear power plans pursuant to Atomic Energy Act of
                           1954, Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 and the
                           National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


                    Coast Guard

                    1.00   Construction or modification of bridges, causeways or pipelines over
                           navigable waters pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 1455.

                    2.00   Permits for Deepwater Ports pursuant to the Deepwater Ports Act of
                           1974 (33 U.S.C. 1501).

                    Federal Aviation Administration



                                                     VI-23









                   3.00 Permits and licenses for construction, operation or alteration of
                         airports.

            FEDERAL ASSISTANCE*

                   DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

                   10.068       Rural Clean Water Program
                   10.409       Irrigation, Drainage, and Other Soil and Water Conservation
                                Loans
                   10.410       Low to Moderate Income Housing Loans
                   10.411       Rural Housing Site Loans
                   10.413       Recreation Facility Loans
                   10.414       Resource Conservation and Development Loans
                   10.415       Rural Renting Housing Loans
                   10.416       Soil and Water Loans
                   10.418       Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities
                   10.422       Business and Industrial Loans
                   10.424       Industrial Development Grants
                   10.426       Area Development Assistance Planning Grants
                   10.429       Above Moderate Income Housing Loans
                   10.430       Energy Impacted Area Development Assistance Program
                   10.901       Resource Conservation and Development
                   10.902       Soil and Water Conservation
                   10.904       Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention
                   10.906       River Basin Surveys and Investigations

                   DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

                   11.300       Economic Development -   Grants and Loans for Public Works and
                                Development Facilities
                   11.301       Economic Development -   Business Development Assistance
                   11.302       Economic Development -   Support for Planning Organizations
                   11.304       Economic Development -   State and Local Economic Development
                                Planning
                   11.305       Economic Development -   State and Local Economic Development
                                Planning
                   11.307       Special Economic Development and Adjustment Assistance Program
                                - Long Term Economic Deterioration
                   11.308       Grants to States for Supplemental and Basic Funding of Titles
                                1, 11, 111, IV, and V Activities
                   11.405       Anadromous and Great Lakes Fisheries Conservation
                   11.407       Commercial Fisheries Research and Development
                   11.417       Sea Grant Support
                   11.427       Fisheries    Development  and Utilization     -   Research and
                                Demonstration Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program
                   11.501       Development   and    Promotion   of    Ports   and    Intermodel
                                Transportation
                   11.509       Development and Promotion of Domestic Waterborne Transport
                                Systems

                   DEPARTMEPff OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT


                                                    VI-24






   0                 14.112       Mortgage   Insurance         Construction     or   Substantial
                                  Rehabilitation of Condominium Projects
                     14.115       Mortgage Insurance    Development of Sales Type Cooperative
                                  Projects
                                  Mortgage Insurance    Homes
                     14.124       Mortgage Insurance    Investor Sponsored Cooperative Housing
                     14.125       Mortgage Insurance    Land Development and Mew Communities
                     14.126       Mortgage Insurance    Management Type Cooperative Projects
                     14.127       Mortgage Insurance    Mobile Home Parks
                     14.218       Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants
                     14.219       Community Development Block Grants/Small Cities Program
                     14.221       Urban Development Action Grants
                     14.223       Indian Community Development Block Grant Program

                     DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

                     15.400       Outdoor Recreation - Acquisition, Development and Planning
                     15.402       Outdoor Recreation - Technical Assistance
                     15.403       Disposal  of Federal    Surplus Real     Property for Parks,
                                  Recreation,   and Historic Monuments
                     15.411       Historic Preservation Grants-in-Aid
                     15.417       Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Program
                     15.600       Anadromous Fish Conservation
                     15.605       Fish Restoration
                     15.611       Wildlife Restoration
                     15.613       Marine Mammal Grant Program
                     15.802       Minerals Discovery Loan Program
                     15.950       National Water Research and Development Program
                     15.951       Water Resources Research and Technology - Assistance to State
                                   Institutes
                     15.952       Water Research and Technology - Matching Funds to State
                                  Institutes

                     DEPARTNUff OF TRANSPORTATION

                     20.102       Airport Development Aid Program
                     20.103       Airport Planning Grant Program
                     20.205       Highway Research, Planning, and Construction
                     20.309       Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement - Guarantee of
                                  Obligations
                     20.310       Railroad   Rehabilitation    and   Improvement   -   Redeemable
                                  Preference   Shares
                     20.506       Urban Mass Transportation Demonstration Grants
                     20.509       Public Transportation for Rural and Small Urban Areas

                     GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

                     39.002       Disposal of Federal Surplus Real Property


                     CONNUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION



                                                     VI-25









                 49.002       Community Action
                 49.011       Community Economic Development
                 49.013       State Economic Opportunity Offices
                 49.017       Rural Development Loan Fund
                 49.018       Housing and Community Development (Rural Housing)

                 SHALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

                 59.012       Small Business Loans
                 59.013       State and Local Development Company Loans
                 59.024       Water Pollution Control Loans
                 59.025       Air Pollution Control Loans
                 59.031       Small Business Pollution Control Financing Guarantee

                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                 66.001       Air Pollution Control Program Grants
                 66.418       Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment Works
                 66.426       Water Pollution Control - State and Areawide Water Quality
                              Management Planning Agency
                 66.451       Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Program Support Grants
                 66.452       Solid Waste Management Demonstration Grants
                 66.600       Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants Program Support
                               Comprehensive Environmental     Response,   Compensation and
                              Liability (Super Fund)

                       Numbers refer to the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs, 1980 and its two
                       subsequent updates.





           C.    Federal and State actions and programs necessary to further the City of
                 Rochester's LWRP

           (1)   Introduction

                 The majority of the uses and projects proposed in the city's LWRP can be
                 implemented through local actions as described in SECTION V: IMPLEMENTING
                 TECHNIQUES. The primary local action required for imple-mentation of the
                 LWRP is adoption of various amendments to the City Zoning Ordinance and
                 Zoning Map, in order to encourage appropriate waterfront development and
                 to protect sensitive environmental areas in the shorezone.      This action
                 requires City Council review and approval following a public hearing.

                 There are, however, several projects proposed in the plan which will
                 require federal and State assistance and coordination.         The various
                 federal and State agencies which will be involved in this assistance and
                 coordination are listed below, along with a description of the type of
                 assistance required.





                                                 VI-26








             (2)    Federal Actions:

                    (a)   Department 9f Defense, Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):

                          (1)   The USACE should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                                design, funding and completion of a surge protection and
                                control project at the outlet of the Genesee River with Lake
                                Ontario that eliminates or significantly reduces the surge
                                problem in the river.

                          (2)   The USACE should investigate and discuss with the U.S. Coast
                                Guard navigational problems in the Genesee River in order to
                                determine how they may affect federally owned land at and
                                adjacent to the Coast Guard Station.

                          (3)   The USACE should coordinate and cooperate with the city in the
                                review and approval of the design / engineering of new boat
                                docks, slips and riverbank stabilization along the west bank
                                of the river, near the Stutson Street Bridge.

                    (b)   Federal Highway Administration (FHWA):

                          (1)   The FHWA should coordinate and cooperate with the city in the
                                funding, design and construction of a replacement bridge for
                                the Stutson Street Bridge, over the Genesee River. The FHWA
                                should provide appropriate funding for this project.

                          (2)   The FHWA should coordinate and cooperate with the city in the
                                funding, design and reconstruction of Lake Avenue from Ridge
                                Road West to Beach Avenue.         The FHWA should provide
                                appropriate funding for this project.


             (3)    State Actions:

                    (a)   New York State Department of Transportation  (NYSDOT):

                          (1)   The NYSDOT should coordinate and cooperate with the city in
                                the funding, design and construction of a replacement bridge
                                for the Stutson Street Bridge, over the Genesee River. The
                                NYSDOT should provide appropriate funding for this project.

                          (2)   The NYSDOT should coordinate and cooperate with the city in
                                the funding, design and reconstruction of Lake Avenue from
                                Ridge Road West to Beach Avenue.

                    (b)   New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC):

                          (1)   The NYSDEC should implement and administer Article 24 of the
                                New York State Environmental Conservation Law regarding
                                wetland areas in Rochester.




                                                   VI-27








                        (2)   The NYSDEC should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                              mapping, adoption and implementation of New York State's
                              Section 505 Coastal Erosion Control legislation, and the
                              city's local coastal erosion ordinance.

                        (3)   The NYSDEC should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                              funding of the purchase of 40 acres of environmentally
                              sensitive land along the east bank of the Genesee River, and
                              31 acres of land along the west bank of the river north of
                              Turning Point Park, to be preserved as park land.

                  (c)   New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
                        (NYSOPRHP):

                        (1)   The NYSOPRHP should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                              design, planning, development, construction and funding of a
                              75-slip transient marina at the Port of Rochester site. The
                              NYSOPRHP should provide appropriate funding for this project.

                        (2)   The NYSOPRHP should coordinate and cooperate with the city
                              regarding the potential designation of the redeveloped port
                              site and new marina as a state park.

                        (3)   The NYSOPRHP should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                              funding of the purchase of 40 acres of environmentally
                              sensitive land along the east bank of the Genesee River, and
                              31 acres of land along the west bank of the river north of
                              Turning Point Park, to be preserved as park land.

                        (4)   The NYSOPRHP should coordinate and cooperate with the city
                              regarding the renegotiation of the operation and maintenance
                              agreement for State-owned property along River Street, south
                              of the Stutson Street Bridge.

                 (d)    New York State Department of State (NYSDOS):

                        (1)   The NYSDOS should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                              provision of funding to implement portions of its LWRP
                              including, but not limited to, the potential development and
                              adoption of water surface use regulations and the planning,
                              engineering and construction of future waterfront development
                              projects and infrastructure improvements.

                        (2)   The NYSDOS should coordinate with and assist the city in the
                              provision of funding, along with local labor unions, for the
                              preservation of the historic Genesee Lighthouse.

                 (e)    New York State Office of General Services:

                        (1)   Prior to any development occurring in the water or on the
                              immediate waterfront, the Office of General Services should be
                              consulted for a determination of the state's interest in



                                                 VI-28









                                underwater or formerly underwater lands and for authorization
                                to use and occupy these lands.

             2.    FEDERAL AND  STATE ACTIONS AND PROGRAMS WHICH SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN IN A
                   MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE LWRP

             (A)   Federal Actions and Programs (Source: "Catalogue of Federal Programs -
                   1984"):

                   (1)   Department of Commerce:
                         (a)    Economic Development Administration:
                                      Economic Development - Grants for Public Works and
                                      Development Facilities.
                                      Economic Development - Business Development Assistance.
                                      Economic   Development    -   Support   for     Planning
                                      Organizations.
                                      Economic Development - Technical Assistance.
                                      Economic Development - Public Works Impact Projects.
                                      Economic Development - State and Local          Economic
                                      Development Planning.
                                      Economic Development - District Operational Services.
                                      Special Economic Development and Adjustment Assistance
                                      Program - Sudden and Severe or Long-Term Economic
                                      Deterioration.
                         (b)    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:
                                      Geodetic Surveys and Services.
                                      Nautical Charts and Related Data.
                                      Anadromous and Great Lakes Fisheries Conservation.
                                      Commercial'Fisheries Research and Development.
                                      Sea Grant Support.
                                      Coastal Zone Management Program Administration.
                                      Coastal Zone Management Estuarine Sanctuaries.
                                      Coastal Energy Impact Program - Planning Grants.
                                      Financial Assistance for Marine Pollution Research.
                                      Fisheries Development and Utilization @Research and
                                      Development Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program.
                   (2)   Department of Defense:
                         (a)    Department of the Army, Office of the Chief of Engineers:
                                      Aquatic Plant Control.
                                      Beach Erosion Control Projects.
                                      Flood Control Works and Federally Authorized Coastal
                                      Protection Works, Rehabilitation.
                                      Flood Plain Management Services.
                                      Flood Control Projects.
                                      Navigation Projects.
                                      Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control.
                                      Protection, Clearing and Straightening Channels.
                                      Planning Assistance to States.
                                      Section 404 Permit Requirements and Permit Program.
                   (3)   Department of Housing and Urban Development:
                         (a)    Community Planning and Development:
                                      Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants.
                                      Section 312 Rehabilitation Loans.


                                                  VI-29









                         (b)    Office of Policy Development and Research:
                                      General Research and Technology Activity.

                   (4)   Department of the Interior:
                         (a)    Bureau of Reclamation:
                                      National Water Research and Development Program.
                         (b)    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:
                                      Anadromous Fish Conservation
                                      Fishery Research - Information.
                                      Fish Restoration.
                                      Sport Fish Technical Assistance.
                                      Wildlife Restoration.
                         (c)    Geological Survey:
                                      Water Resources Investigation.
                         (d)    National Park Service:
                                      Historic Preservation Grants-In-Aid.
                                      Historic American Buildings Survey / Historic American
                                      Engineering Record.
                                      National Historic Landmark Program.
                                      National Register of Historic Places.
                                      National Natural Landmarks Program.
                                      Technical Preservation Services.
                                      Outdoor Recreation - Acquisition, Development and
                                      Planning (Land and Water Conservation Fund Grants).
                                      Surplus Property Program.
                                      Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Program.
                         (e)    Office of Water Policy:
                                      Water Research Institute Program.
                   (5)   Department of Transportation:
                         (a)    United States Coast Guard:
                                      Boating Safety.
                                      Coast Guard Cooperative Marine Sciences Program.
                         (b)    Federal Highway Administration:
                                      Highway Planning and Construction.
                                      Highway Beautification.
                         (c)    Maritime Administration:
                                      Development and Promotion of Domestic Waterborne
                                      Transport Systems.
                                      Maritime Research and Development.
                   (6)   General  Services Administration:
                                      Disposal of Federal Surplus Real Property.
                                      Donation of Federal Surplus Real Property.
                   (7)   Small  Business Administration:
                                      Small Business Loans.
                                      Small Business Investment Companies.
                                      State and Local Development Company Loans.
                                      Small Business Energy Loans.
                                      Small Business Pollution Control Financing Guarantee.
                   (8)   Environmental Protection Agency:
                         (a)    Office of Air, Noise and Radiation:
                                      Air Pollution Control Program Grants.




                                                     VI-30









                           (b)    Office of Water:
                                        Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment Works.
                                        Water Pollution Control - State and Interstate Program
                                        Grants.
                                        Construction Management Assistance Grants.
                                        Water Quality Management Planning.
                           (c)    Office of Research and Development:
                                        Environmental Protection - Consolidated Research Grants.
                                        Air Pollution Control Research Grants.
                                        Solid Waste Disposal Research Grants.
                                        Water Pollution Control - Research, Development and
                                        Demonstration Grants.
                                        Safe Drinking Water Research and Demonstration Grants.
                                        Toxic Substances Research Grants.
                           (d)    Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response:
                                        Hazardous Waste Management Financial Assistance to
                                        States.
                                        Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund.
                     (9)   Federal Emergency Management Agency:
                           (a)    Federal Insurance Administration:
                                        Flood Insurance.
                           (b)    State and Local Programs and Support:
                                        State Assistance Program (Flood Hazard).
                                        Acquisition of Flood-Damaged Structures.
                                        Disaster Preparedness Improvement Grants.

              (B)    State Actions and  Programs (Source: NYSDEC, NYSDOS):

                     (1)   Council on the Arts:
                           (a)    Provision of funding under the architecture and environmental
                                  arts program.
                     (2)   Dormitory Authority of the State of New York:
                           (a)    Provision of  construction management, planning and design
                                  services for capital projects.
                     (3)   Department of Environmental Conservation:
                           (a)    Planning, development, construction, major rennovation or
                                  expansion of facilities.
                           (b)    Division of Construction Management
                                        Review and approval of federal grant application plans
                                        and specifications for wastewater treatment facilities.
                                        Mining Permit.
                                        Permit to Plug and Abandon Non-Commercial Wells.
                                        Permit to Use Chemicals to Control Aquatic Insects.
                                        Permit to Use Chemicals to Control Undesirable Fish.
                                        Underground Gas Storage Permit.
                                        Well Drilling Permit.
                           (c)    Division of Regulatory Affairs
                                        Actions   relating    to   provisions   of    the    State
                                        Environmental Quality Review Act.
                                        Approval of Well System and Permit to Operate.
                                        Issuance of Protection of Waters Permits for dams, fill,
                                        docks, piers, wharves, excavations in navigable waters,
                                        disturbances of the bed or bank of mprotected streamsm.


                                                     VI-31










                                     Water Supply Permits.
                                     Freshwater Wetlands Permits.

                        (d)   Division of Air Resources
                                     Certificate of approval for Air Pollution Episode Action
                                     Plan.
                                     Certificate   to   Operate:    Stationary     Combustion;
                                     Installation;   incinerator;    Process,    Exhaust    or
                                     Ventilation System.
                                     Permit for Burial of Radioactive Material.
                                     Permit for Restricted Burning.
                                     Permit    to    Construct:    Stationary      Combustion;
                                     Installation; Incinerator; Indirect Source of Air
                                     Contamination; Process, Exhaust or Ventilation System.
                                     Administration of other air resource rules and
                                     regulations.
                        (e)   Division of Solid Waste
                                     Permit to Construct and/or Operate a Solid Waste
                                     Management Facility.
                                     Septic Tank Cleaner and Industrial Waste Collector
                                     Permit.






































                                                  VI-32






   9














































                                    SECTION VII: CONSULTATION VITH OTHER AFFECTED FEDERAL,
                                                         STATE, REGIONAL AND LOCAL AGENCIES
  0











                     INTRODtICTION

                     The city consulted and coordinated with various governmental agencies
                     regarding preparation of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
                     (LWRP). In addition, the city consulted with the adjacent towns of Greece
                     and Irondequoit to ensure a coordinated approach to waterfront development
                     in certain areas. The result of these consultations was a waterfront plan
                     with greater public and agency acceptance, as well as greater potential
                     for actual implementation.


              2.     STATE AGENCY CONSULTATION

                     The city had the following consultations with state agencies during
                     development of its LWRP:

                            (a)    New York State Department of State (NYSOOS), dealing with:

                                   (1)   procedures for applying for a grant to prepare a Local
                                         Waterfront Revitalization Program;
                                   (2)   requirements for preparation of a Local Waterfront
                                         Revitalization Program, with particular attention to
                                         State    policy     interpretation      and     consistency
                                         requirements;
                                   (3)   procedures for selecting consultants to work on the
                                         program;
                                   (4)   procedures for local participation in the program;
                                   (5)   establishment of a public participation process; and
                                   (6)   application for program implementation grants.

                            (b)    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
                                   (HYSDEC), dealing with:

                                   (1)   implementation and impacts of a Coastal Erosion
                                         Management Plan;
                                   (2)   coordination of proposed local environmental standards
                                         with existing county, State and federal standards;
                                   (3)   specific material contained in the LWRP inventory and
                                         analysis, including designation of the lower Genesee
                                         River as a Osignificant fish and wildlife habitatm; and
                                   (4)   preliminary review of the city's LWRP Draft Generic
                                         Environmental Impact Statement.
                            (c)    New York State Department of Transportation (HYSDOT), dealing
                                   with:

                                   (1)   the review of city recommendations for the design and
                                         replacement of the Stutson Street Bridge; and
                                   (2)   the review of city plans for reconstruction of Lake
                                         Avenue.




                                                       V11-3











           3.    COUNTY AGENCY CONSULTATION

                 The city had the following consultations with county agencies during
                 development of its LWRP:

                        (a)   Monroe County Departments of Planning and Parks, dealing with:

                              (1)   coordination of proposed LWRP uses and projects with
                                    those proposed by adjoining communities and with the
                                    recommendations of the master plan being prepared for
                                    county parks.

                        (b)   Monroe County Water Quality Management Agency, dealing with:

                              (1)   review of proposals dealing with control of urban runoff
                                    and water quality in the Rochester embayment.


           4.    NEIGHBORING MUNICIPALITY CONSULTATION

                 The city had the following consultations with neighboring municipalities
                 during development of its LWRP:
                        (a)   Town of 1rondequoit, dealing with:

                              (1)   determination of the appropriate boundary location for
                                    the city LWRP along the eastern bank of the Genesee
                                    River;
                              (2)   review of the overall LWRP development program;
                              (3)   recommendations for the design of a replacement for the
                                    Stutson Street Bridge; and
                              (3)   potential for future coordination of specific design
                                    plans for waterfront development along the east bank of
                                    the Genesee River, near the Stutson Street Bridge.

                        W     Town of Greece, dealing with:

                              (1)   review of the overall LWRP development program; and
                              (2)   potential for future coordination of specific design
                                    plans for waterfront development projects including
                                    replacement of the Stutson Street Bridge.












                                                 VII-4






  9









































                                                           SECTION VIII: LOCAL CONNITNENT
                                                 .m ..0.. M@         --       -



  0











              LOCAL COMITNOIT

              The city recognized the complexities of implementing a comprehensive land use
              plan for the City of Rochester's coastal areas, and the importance of direct
              public participation in that effort.    It therefore established, early in the
              planning process, a Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC) as a means of encouraging
              public interest in and developing public support and commitment for the Local
              Waterfront Revitalization Program.

              Initially, public and private agencies with potential interest in waterfront
              revitalization were identified.     These agencies included neighborhood and
              business groups within and adjacent to the LWRP study area, the Monroe County
              Planning Department and Parks Department, the City Environmental Commission and
              Planning Commission, and groups with maritime interests such as Sea Grant, the
              Monroe County Fishery Advisory Board, yacht clubs, marina operators, and real
              estate brokerage firms.

              Each of the interested organizations was contacted in writing and requested to
              designate a person to represent the organization on the LWRP CAC.        Eighteen
              individuals were designated as members of the city's CAC. The Chairperson of the
              City Planning Commission was designated as the Chairperson of the CAC.

              In the six years from the date of its initial meeting on November 8, 1984, the
              CAC met routinely to:

                    (a)   discuss and review the LWRP inventory and analysis;
                    (b)   establish coastal management policies;
                    (c)   establish land use zones and subzones within the LWRP boundary and
                          agree on appropriate uses and projects for those areas;
                    (d)   review concept design plans for Ontario Beach Park, the Port
                          Authority site and the River Street site;
                    (e)   establish implementation techniques for the LWRP policies;
                    (f)   review proposed city charter changes, and zoning ordinance map and
                          text amendments for the waterfront revitalization area;
                    (9)   oversee the preparation of a concept design plan for the River
                          Harbor Redevelopment Area; and
                    (h)   review and comment on the Draft LWRP and Draft Generic Environmental
                          Impact Statement (DGEIS) documents.

              Communication to groups with a direct interest in the city's waterfront was also
              accomplished through the LWRP CAC. Each CAC member functioned as a conduit for
              the exchange of information and ideas about the plan between the committee and
              his or her respective constituencies.

              in addition to meetings generated by the CAC, City staff held numerous meetings
              with the Charlotte Community Association and the Charlotte Businessmen's
              Association regarding the Draft LWRP and the River Harbor Redevelopment Area
              Design/Feasibility Study. Meetings were also held with governmental entities,
              which could be affected by the implementation of the city's LWRP. These included
              the adjacent towns of Greece and Irondequoit, who were also preparing LWRPs.



                                                   VIII-3









            In summary, nearly 80 public meetings or presentations were conducted during
            development of the program to encourage public comment and participation.

            A combined public hearing with the Rochester Environmental Commission (REC) and
            informational meeting with the City Planning Commission was held on March 5,
            1990, regarding the city's Draft LWRP and DGEIS. At this meeting, citizens had
            an opportunity to comment on the specifics of the Draft LWRP document and
            environmental impact statement, as well as on the proposed zoning ordinancetext
            and map amendments. Comments and testimony touched on various aspects of the
            Draft LWRP including environmental concerns, land use issues, traffic and parking
            management, zoning controls, business and neighborhood impacts, and the overall
            planning and public input process.

            A final public hearing on the approval of the city's LWRP, Final Generic
            Environmental Impact Statement, proposed city charter changes, and zoning
            ordinance text and map amendments was held with the Rochester City Council on
            August 14, 1990.   Interested citizens, associations and organizations spoke at
            that meeting regarding their comments and concerns about the plan. The Final
            Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and Final Generic Environmental Impact
            Statement were adopted by the Rochester City Council and approved for transmittal
            to the New York State Department of State on September 11, 1990.

































                                                  V111-4






   0












                                             CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                  LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

                    Rochester River Harbor Redevelopment Design and Feasibility Study
                                   (pertinent sections of draft report)


                                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                        Page
              Executive Sumnary    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...      3

              Introduction         . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    6

              Task III   Issue Identification  and Sumary  . . . . . . . . . . . . .    13

              Task IV   Goals and Objectives   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    27

              Task.V - Thematic Concept  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    31

              Task IX - Policy Relationships   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    33

              Task X - Conclusions   . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   34

              Appendix A               . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    44




















                                                            MEMORANDUM




                               TO:     Larry Stid, Plannina Commission Director
                                       Department of Community Development, City of Rochester

                               FROM:   Stephen Buechner, R-eimann.Buechner Partnership

                               DATE:   February 8, 1989

                               RE:     Rochester River Harbor Redevelopment Feasibility Study




                                                        EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

                               Purpose

                               This report is intended as a comprehensive study with the purpose
                               of developing a unified, cohesive redevelopment plan for the River
                               Harbor Redevelopment Area. The City of Rochester will use this
                               plan as a basis for making appropriate land use, zoning and deve-
                               lopment decisions, and as a general guide for redevelopment activ-
                               ities within the study area. In addition, the redevelopment plan
                               will help to implement several policies of the Local Waterfront
                               Revitalization Program (LWRP).


                               Method

                               The analysis of the River Harbor Redevelopment Area was organized
                               into nine tasks. In the first three tasks, the consulting team
                               collected and analyzed background information on the River Harbor
                               Study Area. The consultants, working closely with City Planning
                               staff and Charlotte community groups, produced guiding concepts
                               during the next three tasks. The final three tasks presented the
                               consultants' recommendations for the study area.

                               Tasks I-III

                               The first three tasks provided essential background information.
                               Task I summarized the 1984 Ontario Beach Park plan prepared by
                               Reimann.Buechner Partnership and the 1987-88 City Planning Office
                               plan for River Harbor. The goal of these plans was to maximize
                               public waterfront access and water-related recreational opportuni-



                                                              3







                            ies. Task II summarized the history of settlement and waterfront
                            development in the study area. The broader context, Includi
                                                                                            ing
                            Ontario Beach Park and the Village of Charlotte, was considered in
                            the historic summary. Task II also summarized the existing condi-
                            tions in the following categories: Topography, Vegetation, Hydrol-
                            ogy, Views, Vehicular Circulation, Parking, Pedestrian Circula-
                            tion, Utilities, Streetscape, Buildings, Zoning, and Land Use.
                            Task III completed the process of gathering background informa-
                            tion by presenting issues and concerns identified in the first two
                            tasks, as well as in the Contract: Scope of Services (see Appendix
                            C). Four development issues from previous tasks includea 1) pedes-
                            trian connections, 2) inter-relationships for historically sensi-
                            tive sites, 3) natural topographic features, and 4) low density
                            housing location. Six development issues from the Scope of Ser-
                            vices were elaborated: 1) options for the replacement of the
                            Stutson Street Bridge, 2) intersection and streetscape improve-
                            ments, 3) surge control, 4) market demand for major new recreation-
                            al and tourist facilities, 5) east bank concerns, and 6) prev-
                            iously prepared plans.

                            Tasks IV-V1

                            The fourth throuch sixth tasks developed concepts to guide the
                            design development phases. Task IV specified eight goals and
                            related objectives. The goals and objectives were identified as
                            consultant recommendations, City staff concerns, or local citizen
                            concerns. Task V specified a development theme for the redevelop-
                            ment area. The theme was prepared in conjunction with City staff
                            and local community groups. It was decided-that the theme shall
                            be a Turn-* f -the-Century Time Theme, with River Street exhibiting
                            a Nautical Time Theme and all other areas exhibiting a Village
                            Time Theme. Task VI specified design guidelines and standards.
                            These examined details in four categories: I). Street Corridor
                            details, II) Architectural details,- III) Site details, and IV)
                            Signage details. Tasks IV, V and VI provided the guiding concepts
                            for the redevelopment plans and recommendations produced in the
                            last three tasks.

                            Tasks VII-IX
                            The last three tasks provided final recommendations on which to
                            base planning decisions. In Task VII, conceptual plans were drawn.
                            These included site-related diagrammatic presentations of develop-
                            ment potentials, circulation, and waterfront opportunities. In
                            Task VIII, schematic plans at preliminary stages of design deve-
                            lopment were produced and analyzed to identify the relationship of
                            the plans to the City of Rochester LWRP. Task IX matrixed the
                            schematic plans with the LWRP policies to illustrate areas of
                            appl icabi I I ty.
                            The basic organization for this project is outlined below. The
                            diagram illustrates that the tasks were grouped into three main
                            categories, and that each task built on information generated by
                            previous tasks. More detail on the project organization, Including
                            a flow chart that illustrates the role of community participation



                                                            4







                               in meetings with City staff and consultants, is provided in the
                               Introduction to the River Harbor Redevelopment Design/Feasibility
                               Study.







                                                         PROJECT ORGANIZATION

                                                                      MR,

                                          E
                                                 Task I     Previous Studies
                                          Ira    Task  II   Hi sto ry/Exi sti ng Conditions
                                          I t
                                          C '..
                                                 Task  III  Issues


                                                                           i IN' Ila I


                                                                      lei,    ------
                                                 Task   IV  Goals and Objectives
                                          Iwo    Task V     Theme
                                                 Task  VI   Guidelines and Standards





                                                 Task VII   Concepts
                                                 Task VIII  Schematic Plan
                                                  ask IX    Relationship to LWRP/Draft Report









                                 Conclusions
                                 The River Harbor Redevelopment Design/Feasibility Study resulted
                                 in recommendations at a preliminary level of detail for pedestrian
                                 and   vehicular circulation, boating and waterfront recreation
                                 facilities for the Genesee River, new-housing and retail facili-
                                 ties, the re-use of existing historic buildings, and the provision
                                 of parking for waterfront visitors and residents. The majority of
                                 new facilities were planned for River Street and the immediate
                                 shore zone. Streetscape improvements were suggested for the shore
                                 zone access street, River Street, all adjacent cross-streets, and
  0.                             Lake Avenue.
                                            C
                                                     M3

                                              qT a            n   ts
                                                   sk VII   CIO   p
                                                 Ta         Sch   tic
                                                 T sk VIII    I@t:ions@pi
                                                 Task IX    Re




























                                                                     5













                                 ROCHESTER RIVER HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY



                                                      INTRODUCTION






                            PURPOSE AND SCOPE

                            The purpose of this study is to initiate a unified, cohesive
                            redevelopment plan for the project study area. This plan will be
                            used by the City of Rochester Department of Ccmmunity Development
                            to guide redevelopment activity in the River Harbor Area. It is
                            intended to provide a basis for planning decisions and policy
                            implementation. The products of this study were prepared at a
                            level of detail sufficient to organize effective and appropriate
                            revitalization of the waterfront and adjacent lands. Preliminary
                            land use, engineering, and design solutions were explored for the
                            purpose of directing the outcome of future design development
                            projects. These solutions were coordinated by the directives of
                            the City of Rochester Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
                            (LWRP). The schematic redevelopment plan and policies proposed in
                            this study were intended to ensure that redevelopment is under-
                            taken in a manner consistent with the policies and objectives of
                            the LWRP.


                            CONTEXT

                            The River Harbor Redevelopment Area has been studied in the con-
                            text of other City LWRP projects. Previous projects as detailed in
                            Task I have resulted in a coordinated conceptual design plan for
                            the redevelopment of the River Harbor Study Area, the Port Site,
                            and Ontario Beach Park. The City of Rochester has incorporated the
                            coordinated plan into its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
                            (LWRP). A Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) is a
                            comprehensive, realistic program for the beneficial use, revitali-
                            zation, and protection of a community's waterfront resources. The
                            City of Rochester has received a grant from the New York State
                            Department of State for the preparation of a Local Waterfront
                            Revitalization Program pursuant to Article 42, Section 915 of the
                            New York State Executive Law, the Waterfront Revitalization and
                            Coastal Resources Act. The LWRP is designed to give the community
                            the opportunity to undertake a comprehensive review and analysis
                            of its waterfront, establish clear policies, propose specific
                            uses, and implement these specific uses and projects. Rochester's
                            local waterfront area is defined as those portions of the City
                            bordering Lake Ontario and the Genesee River and their inland
                            extensions. As part of the City's LWRP, the current River Harbor
                            project extends*the design process south from Ontario Beach Park
                            to the River Street area and Lake Avenue commercial strip from



                                                          6








                             Beach Avenue to Lake Ontario State Parkway (refer to Task II Map
                             A: Study Area Context for the specific location of the River
                             Harbor Study Area).

                             STUDY METIHOD

                             The River 'Harbor Redevelopment Design/Feasibility Study was oroan-
                             ized into nine tasks as specified by City Planning staff *. n the
                             Request for Proposals (RFP) for this project. The consultina tean.,
                             headed by the Reimann.Buechner Partnership Landscape Archttects
                             and Planners, and Handler-Grosso Architects, D.J. Parrone & Assoc-
                             iates, P.C., Engineers, and Phoenix Associates, MarketIng Ana-
                             lysts, responded to the RFP. The consulting team (see Appendix 8:
                             Consulting Team; Page 61, Team Qualifications), headed by Reimann-
                             Buechner Partnership, fine-tuned the RFP to reach an agreement
                             with City staff as to the project format (see Appendix C: Project
                             Scope). The project format is presented in the following outline.

                             TASK I: REVIEW AND ANALYZE ONTARIO BEACH PARKPORT OF ROCHESTER
                                       COORDIRATED UESiGN PUNW.

                                 The Consultant team revievied and analyzed the proposed Ontario
                                 Beach Park/Port of Rochester coordinated design plan prepared
                                 by the Reimann.Buechner Partnership, with an emphasis on identi-
                                 fying design and thematic relationships and connections to the
                                 remaining portions of the River Harbor Redevelopment Area.

                                 INTERIM PRODUCTS: None.

                             TASK II: COMPILE HISTORICAL DATA AND EXISTING CONDITIONS

                                 The Consultant team compiled historical information along with
                                 other data on existing land use, zoning, traffic, and develop-
                                 ment characteristics for the study irea from existing documenta-
                                 tion contained in the City of Rochester Local Waterfront Revit-
                                 alization Program and from other sources. Some on-site field
                                 investigations were required in order to complete this task.
                                 This information was analyzed to produce a sumary of develop-
                                 ment conditions which currently existed within the study area
                                 and their relationships to potential future development oppor-
                                 tunities. Data collected included:

                                       -historical overview of area;
                                       -land use and zoning patterns;
                                       -utility service information;
                                       -existing traffic volumes, intersection turning
                                       ,movements and levels of service;
                                       -pedestrian circulation patterns;
                                       -existing parking supply/parking demand informatim
                                       -topographic and other environmental features;
                                       -scenic views and vistas;
                                       -type and condition of building facades;
                                       -inventory of historic sites; and
                                       -previous design or development study recommendations.



                                                             7









                                  INTERIM PRODUCTS:    * Interim memorandum #1 summarizing date
                                                         collectea ana reiationships to future
                                                         development potential.                            40
                                                       * Conceot mao series #1 depicting the data
                                                         coilectea ana relati ships identified.

                              TASK III: IDENTIFY AND    SUMMARIZE SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
                                         AFFECTIRG THE  SiUUY AREA.

                                  The Consultant team, in coordination with City staff and after
                                  consultation with appropriate neighborhood groups, analyzed the
                                  following development issues and concerns to determine their
                                  collective impacts on and inter-relationships to the River
                                  Harbor Study Area.

                                  Issue 1    Pedestrian connections between the proposed Port of
                                             Rochester entry plaza and the north end of the River
                                             Harbor Redevelopment Area.

                                  Issue 2    Inter-relationships for histo  rically sensitive sites
                                             in the River Harbor Area.

                                  Issue 3    Potential for emphasizing natural topographic fea-
                                             tures as assets in redevelopment plans.
                                  Issue 4    Low density housing location. Considerations for
                                             River Street housing should include public access to
                                             the water for recreation.

                                  Issue 5    Options under consideration for replacement of the
                                             Stutson Street Bridge.
                                  Issue 6    Plans for improvements to intersections and street-
                                             scapes in the study area.*
                                  Issue 7    Surge problems in the Genesee River that may affect
                                             waterfront user safety or construction of new water-
                                             front facilities.

                                  Issue 8    Market demand for major new recreational or.tourist
                                             facilities.

                                  Issue 9    Development issues, plans and concerns along the east
                                             bank of the Genesee River.
                                  Issue 10   Previously prepared schematic or conceptual develop-
                                             ment plans for specific portions of the redevelopment
                                             area.
                                  The consultant prepared the above "inventory" of development
                                  issues and concerns for the study area as a whole, and for the
                                  individual subareas.






                                                                 8








                                  INTERIM PRODUCTS:   * Interim memorandum #2 summarizing find-
                                                         ings, of-task.
                                                      * Concept mao series #2 showing development
                                                         issues ana concerns for the study area.

                              TASK IY: PREPARE GOALS  AND OBJECTIVES STATEMENT FOR STUDY AREA.

                                  The Consultant team, in coordination with City staff, prepared
                                  a statement or list of specific desian and develorment goals
                                  and objectives for the River Harbor R-edevelopment 1". -aa based on
                                  the summary of development issues and concerns precIred in Task
                                  III.

                                  INTERIM PRODUCT:       Interim memorandum #3 su=zrizing develop-
                                                         ment goals ana F'Siectives for study
                                                         area.

                              TASK V: DEVELOP A UNIFIED. THE14ATIC CONCEPT FOR THE RIVER HARBOR
                                       REDEVELUPMENT AREA AND SPECiFIC @UBARLA

                                  The Consultant team, in coordination with City staff and using
                                  the information, issues and concerns, and goals and objectives
                                  statement developed in the four previous tasks, prepared a
                                  unified, thematic design concept for the River Harbor Redevelop-
                                  ment Area. The Consultant also prepared thematic design con-
                                  cepts for specific subareas such as the River Street neighbor-
                                  hood, as directed by City staff. The thematic design concepts
                                  included a description of appropriate land uses, building/fa-
                                  cade design themes, landscape and streetscape design themes,
                                  etc., and served as a guide for reviewing site plans and for
                                  developing design standards.

                                  INTERIM PRODUCT:       Interim menorandum #4 outlining thematic
                                                         design Mcepts foe study area and sub-
                                                         areas.

                              TASK VI: DEVELOP SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR
                                        BULLUING FACAULS, INFILL ULVELOPMENT AND STREEMM
                                        WITHIN STUDY AKLA.

                                  Based on the goals and objectives statement and themati@ desion
                                  concept developed for the Redevelopment Area in previous tasks,
                                  the Consultant team, in coordination with City staff, prepared
                                  specific design standards for building facades, building restor-
                                  ations, infill development, streetscapes and landscape features
                                  within the study area.
                                  Design guidelines and standards developed in this task included
                                  the following:

                                  I.   Street Corridor

                                       A.   Buildina setbacks and lot coverage
                                       a.   Building- widths and frontage
                                       C.   Off-street and on-street parking
                                       0.   Levels of service



                                                                  9











                                II.  Architectural

                                     A.   Fenestration
                                     B.   Color and materials
                                     C.   Restoration
                                     D.   Building exterior

                                          01. Height and mass
                                          D2. Roofline, roof forms
                                          03. Infill schemes

                                III. Site-

                                     A.   Public planting
                                     B.   Paving - pedestrian spaces and corridors
                                     C.   Lighting and furniture
                                     D.   Private green zones
                                     E.   Parking - screen wall and planting

                                IV. Exterior Sionace

                                     A.   Sign type

                                          Al. Function
                                          A2. Ouration - permanent/temporary

                                     B.   Safety

                                          81. Obstruction
                                          82. Maintenance
                                          83. Illumination

                                INTERIM PRODUCT:      Interim memorandum #5 detailing specific
                                                      design stanaaras and guidelines for study
                                                      area,

                            TASK VII: PREPARE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR RIVER HARBOR SUBAREAS.

                                The Consultant team prepared conceptual redevelopment plans for
                                combined River Harbor Redevelopment Subareas. Major elements of
                                the plan were shown on a composite study area map. The redeve-
                                lopment area plan included the following concept maps:

                                1.   Oevelopment Potentials: Proposals for infill sites, build-
                                     ing reuse, redevelopment sites, and land use programs.
                                2.   Circulation: Proposals for major vehicular routes, minor
                                     vehicular routes, pedestrian routes, and parking areas.
                                3.   Waterfront Opportunities: Boardwalk/fishing, boating, and
                                     special use.






                                                              10








                                 FINAL PRODUCT: * Concept plan series #1 for combined subareas
                                                  showing oeveiopment -opportunities, public
                                                  access, proposed waterfront uses, parking and
                                                  landscape improvements, etc.
                                               *  Interim memorandum #6 detailing alternative
                                                  design sojutions.

                             TASK VIII: PREPARE   SCHEMATIC SITE PLANS FOR SPECIFIC SITES WITHIN
                                        THE RiVER HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT

                                 The Consultant team prepared schematic site plans and illustra-
                                 tive renderings for five specific sites within -cne River Harbor
                                 Redevelopment Area. This work included:

                                   Preparation of a schematic site plan for parking, landscape
                                   work, and public access/circulation improvements around the
                                   Genesee/Charlotte Lighthouse;

                                   Preparation of a schematic site plan for the adaptive reuse
                                   of the River Street Railroad Station, showing landscape and
                                   parking improvements, etc.;

                                   Preparation of a schematic site plan for the redevelopment of
                                   the Tape-Con site and Pelican Bay Marina, showing proposed
                                   use, landscape and parking improvements, building facade
                                   treatments, etc.;

                                   Preparation of a schematic site plan for the River Street
                                   streetscape, riverfront linear park, pedestrian walkway, and
                                   boat slips from Pelican Bay south to Petten Street;

                                   Preparation of a schematic site plan for a representative
                                   Lake Avenue infill or redevelopment site including -building
                                   facades, proposed use, landscape and streetscape treatments,
                                   access and parking improvements, etc.

                                 FINAL PRODUCT: * Concept design sketch series #1 and concept
                                                  plan series #3 showing representative ren er-
                                                  Ings and sitrplans for specific areas listed
                                                  above, to include design layouts, public
                                                  access, proposed uses-, site improvements,
                                                  facade treatments, etc.

                             TASK IX: IDENTIFY RELATIONSHIP OF FINAL PLANS TO POLICIES OF THE
                                       CITY'S LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAT-7M
                                       PREPARE FiNAL REPORT.

                                 The Consultant identified how and to what extent the various
                                 redevelopment plans, design standards and schematic site plans
                                 prepared for the River Harbor Redevelopment Area will address
                                 or implement applicable policies of the City's Local Waterfront
                                 Revitalization Program. A matrix chart was produced showing
                                 such relationships. The Consultant compiled all material,
                                 plans, drawings, analyses and recommendations into a draft
                                 final report including an executive summary and appropriate









                                appendices. The draft final report was reviewed by City staff
                                and the LWRP Citizen's Advisory Committee. The Consultant
                                prepared a final report based on that review.

                                INTERIM PRODUCT:     *  Interim memorandum #7 summarizing, in
                                                        matrix format, the-FeTationships of each
                                                        major project recommendation or proposal
                                                        to the appropriate LWRP policies.

                                .FINAL PRODUCT:      *  Draft Final Report to include all data,
                                                        ana7y-ses ana recommendations developed as
                                                        part of the project. Final report shall
                                                        include all maps, figures, drawings, and
                                                        plans in an appropriate scale, prepared
                                                        as part of the Study.
                                                     * Final Report based on review of draft
                                                        report E=yity staff and the LWRP Citi-
                                                        zenis Advisory Committee.
                             The project method also included many meetings between the consul-
                             tants and the Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC) for the City LWRP
                             and. the Charlotte Community Association. The meetino schedules
                             were coordinated with strategic points in the project organization
                             such that community input was included in key decisions (see
                             Appendix C: Project Scope, Page C7). Schedule A-1 charts the
                             relationship of the community meeting schedule with the project
                             task timetable.




































                                                                12














                                                            MEMORANDUM



                                DATE:  November 17, 1988

                                RE:    Rochester River Harbor Redevelopment Feasibility Study


                                            TASK III: ISSUE IDENTIFICATION AND SUMMARY


                                This memorandum analyzes specific development issues raised in
                                Tasks I and 11. After meeting with City staff and in consultation
                                with the LWRP Citizen's Advisory Committee, the following issues
                                are summarized and analyzed for impacts on the River harbor
                                Redevelopment Area:

                                Develooment Issues Identified in Task I and Task 11

                                Issue I  Pedestrian connections between the proposed Port of
                                         Rochester entry plaza and the north end of the River
                                         Harbor Redevelopment Area.

                                Issue 2  Inter-relationships of historically sensitive site$ in
                                         the River Harbor Area.

                                Issue 3  Potential for emphasizing natural topographic features as
                                         assets in redevelopment plans.

                                Issue 4  Low density housing locations. Site planning considera-
                                         tion for River Street housing should include public
                                         access to the water for recreation.

                                DeveloDment Issues Identified In the Contract Scove of Services

                                Issue 5  Options under consideration for replacement of the
                                         Stutson Street Bridge.

                                Issue 6  Plans for improvements to intersections and streetscapes
                                         in the study area.
                                Issue 7  Surge problems in the Genesee River that may affect
                                         waterfront user safety or construction of new waterfront
                                         facilities.

                                Issue 8  Market demand for major new recreational or tourist
                                         facilities.

                                Issue 9  Development issues, plans and concerns along the east
                                         bank of the Genesee River.



                                                                     13







                                      Issue 10 Previously prepared schematic or conceptual development
                                                  plans for specific portions of the redevelopment area.

                                      ISSUE 1 - PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS

                                      As noted in Task 1, logical connections between the Port of
                                      Rochester entry plaza and the River Harbor study area exist at the
                                      Pelican Bay Marina and Charlotte Lighthouse Park. Ideally, the
                                      pedestrian way would extend the waterfront promenade proposed for
                                      the east side of the redeveloped warehouses south along the entire
                                      length of the river bank. Visitors to the Port of Rochester and
                                      River Harbor developments would have the maximum access to the
                                      Genesee River if a continuous pedestrian walk were constructed.
                                      There are, however, several concerns for the safety and welfare of
                                      waterfront users if the scheme were so developed. The main issue
                                      is that the River Harbor waterfront is an active marina; potential
                                      conflicts between pedestrians and marina operations include risks
                                      to boats in dry storage, loss of privacy for owners of docked
                                      boats, and safety risks to pedestrians from heavy lifting equip-
                                      ment during fall boat removal and spring boat launching opera-
                                      tions. Other potential safety risks to visitors that must be
                                      addressed in Subarea 8 are the crossing of the east/west Conrail
                                      tracks between the proposed new waterfront entry plaza and the
                                      Pel ican Bay/Charlotte Lighthouse redevelopments and pedestrian
                                      crossings of the north/south railroad tracks at the Tape-Con/River



                                                                                                                Lake Ontario
                                  Lake Ontario                     Lake Ontario    



                                  


                                  


           Diagram 1. Unique features   Diagram 2. Pedestrian Routing   Diagram 3. Points of conflict

           Legend                          Legend                          Legend
   ******* Railroad                -- Primary Route                 *** Boat Launch Crossing
           Water-Related Facilities   Primary Alternate Route           Railroad crossing
                                      Secondary Route                   Dangerous Intersection       scale: NTS
                                                                                                            
                                                                  











                                             





















                                                                                   14








                             Street Station redevelopments. Additional concerns with increased
                             use of the river bank include hazardous thin ice in early winter,
                             high winds and water surge associated with Lake Ontario storms
                             occurrina from late August through the fall, and rough melt waters
                             with ice chunks due to erratic freeze/thaw cycles during spring.

                             Diagram 1, Unique Features, locates some outstanding features
                             adjacent to the River harbor Redevelopment study area. These
                             features should be highlighted in the design of pedestrian link-
                             ages for the study area. Visitors should have either direct access
                             or visual access for the passive enjoyment of outstanding water-
                             front features. From the lighthouse, there are currently two
                             connections between Lake Avenue and River Street. One involves
                             cutting directly east through the side slope to River Street. The
                             other takes Lighthouse Street on a gentle gradient to Latta Road.
                             Due to parking problems at the Lighthouse, Lighthouse Street may
                             be developed as a main access to Lighthouse Park.

                             Diagram 2, Pedestrian Routing,   shows possible routing for pedes-
                             trian ways through the redevelopment area. The primary route
                             maximizes public exposure to the waterfront. Bridging the railroad
                             and marina is a possibility, although the height required to do so
                             renders this solution impractical . The alternate route offers
                             vistas from the Lighthouse Park overlooking the Genesee River from
                             Stutson Street to Lake Ontario. The alternate route ameliorates
                             safety risks from the movement of heavy lifting equipment used to
                             move boats in and out of marina storage by bringing visitors
                             around the west side of Pelican Say Marina. East/west connections
                             exist at Latta Road, Stutson Street, and Petten Street.

                             Diagram 3, Points of Conflict, locates the places where pedestrian
                             safety and welfare are potentially      at risk. The design of new
                             pedestrian connections and upgrading of existing pedestrian ways
                             should reinforce the uniqueness of the area by emphasizing the
                             interrelationships of historic waterfront sites. Concerns for
                             visitor safety should be addressed by careful consideration of
                             several options at dangerous crossing places. A coordinated ef-
                             fort, including upgraded tree plantings, improved road pavement
                             edges, sidewalk paving, and edge definition on streets in the
                             River Harbor area would have a positive long term effect on the
                             character of Charlotte neighborhoods; such improvements would
                             further reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts.

                             ISSUE 2 - HISMRICALLY SENSITTYIE SITES

                             The railroad swing bridge, the lighthouse, the railroad station,
                             and several Stutson Street buildings are the outstanding historic
                             resources in the River Harbor Redevelopment area. As noted above,
                             the interrelationships between waterfront resources offer opportun-
                             ities for the enhancement of a pedestrian walk along the Genesee
                             River. The swing bridge is not accessible to pedestrians, but
                             while operative, it allows visitors to watch trains crossing the
                             river. The swing bridge is clearly visible from Lighthouse Park,
                             the slope behind Harbor View Miniature Golf, the Lake Avenue
                             vehicle bridge, and the boat launch area north of the railroad.



                                                            15








                             The Charlotte/Cenesee Lighthouse and Park has potential both as a
                             focal point and as an overlook (see Issue 3 below). It reiates to
                             the swing bridge and train station as a point from which to view
                             these places, but otherwise has no direct relationship to them.
                             Though it is topographically more closely connected to Lake Avenue
                             than to River Street, the lighthouse is set back and cut off from
                             Lake Avenue by the holy Cross Church parking lot. In addition to
                             this deep setback from Lake Avenue, the lighthouse is also located
                             too far (2 blocks) north of the other outstanding historic build-
                             ings at the intersection of Lake Avenue and Stutson Street to have
                             any direct relationship to them.

                             The train station on River Street functions as a waterside focal
                             point and could be a memorable destination for visitors if it were
                             redeveloped. Approaches from Latta Road and River Street give 3/4
                             views of the historic station, the most dramatic of which is the
                             descent traveling north an River Street from Stutson Street. The
                             station currently relates only spatially to significant buildings
                             on R'iver Street, now occupied by Sammy's Bar and Tape-Con Manufac-
                             turing, because the railroad tracks create a barrier between the
                             station/shorezone and development west of the tracks. It has an
                             unmistakable identity as a train station, and its location in the
                             low marginal land along the river has helped to intensify the
                             autonomy of the station as a focal point and point of reference.
                             Streetscape design for River Street may draw from the train sta-
                             tion for historic detailing (e.g. lighting, trackside treatments).

                             The historic buildings on Stutson Street from the bridge to Lake
                             Avenue are a mixture of types, including residences, a fire hall,
                             a police station, commercial buildings and churches. Though near-
                             by, this cluster of historically significant structures is not
                             adjacent to the train station, swing bridge or lighthouse.

                             The. Stutson Street Bridge is not salvageable (see Issue 5), and
                             therefore should not be considered in redevelopment plans.

                             ISSUE 3 - NATURAL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES

                             The pronounced separation of riverside development from the rest
                             of the commercial and residential community is a result of*natural
                             topography. The steep east-facing slopes and crest can potentially
                             be exploited for views of the river through the development of
                             overlooks. Possible locations for these lookouts exist south of
                             the intersection of Stutson Street and River Street on the east
                             side of River Street, at the north end of Lighthouse Street, at
                             the east side of Lighthouse Park, and along the steep slopes
                             behind the RG & E substation and Riverside Miniature Golf.

                             The significant change in elevation from the river to Lake Avenue
                             will separate new waterside tourist activity from existing resi-
                             dential neighborhoods. The autonomy of the riverside sites may be
                             a benefit in that it could allow for waterfront development in a
                             theme which might otherwise seem exaggerated and out of place if
                             it were directly adjacent to the well -established residential
                             neighborhoods of Charlotte.


                                                                16








                              Besides direct access to the river edge, public views to the water
                              should be enhanced. Overviews and glimpses of the waterfront
                              destination could establish a sense of anticipation of arrival at
                              the river bank. Vistas to the waterfront from overlook positions
                              could enrich the pedestrian's overall experience by providing a
                              broad view that takes in all of the redevelopment waterfront. This
                              type of overview might encourage visitors to use the boar6talk
                              along the river.

                              Historic views to Lake Ontario and the Genesee River from Light-
                              house Street and the Charlotte /Genesee Lighthouse grounds should
                              be restored and enframed by the selective removal of obstructing
                              trees. A planting scheme for trees on Lighthouse Street that does
                              not block waterfront views should be prepared.

                              ISSUE 4 - LOW DENSITY HOUSING

                              There is an overwhelminq consensus in the Charlotte community that
                              housing development aiong the Genesee River should not block
                              public visual access to the water, or preclude the possibility for
                              the development of water-related and water-dependent recreation.
                              Small scale, low density housing is preferred to high density,
                              moderate I y-scal ed or highrise structures. Housing as a mixed use
                              on River Street is acceptable only if the actual shoreline remains
                              open to the public. The preferred location for new housing is in
                              open areas west of Lake Avenue.

                              ISSUE 5 - ST11TSON STREET BRIDGE REPUCEMENT

                              The Stutson Street Bridge has been deemed structurally deficient
                              and has deteriorated beyond feasible rehabilitation according to
                              Monroe County Engineering Department, P.I.R., 1986, Larsen
                              Engineers/ Architects.
                              According to the report prepared by Donald J. Bergman and
                              Associates, traffic at the Lake, Stutson, and Parkway intersec-
                              tions should operate with only minor delays. Serious traffic
                              congestion occurs, however, during summer weekend days when boat
                              traffic is also very high. This corresponds to the Stutson Street
                              Bridge being raised once every fifteen minutes. The report also
                              states thai if the Stutson Street Bridge were aligned with the
                              Lake Ontario State Parkway, Stutson Street would become a local
                              residential street forming a neighborhood network with River
                              Street and Latta Road.

                              The following are alternatives for the Stutson Street Bridge
                              replacement:

                              Alternative #1 involves removing the existing bridge and construc-
                              ting a nFw-Dridge in the same location. A bridge with a hicher
                              clearance could be installed, but problems will occur during
                              construction. The next closest crossing of the Genesee River would
                              be the Veteran's bridge about four miles to the south, which would
                              be a hardship for motorists, as well as emergency vehicles. If the
                              bridge were to remain in the same place, It would not help to


                                                              17








                             alleviate any traffic problems in the Lake, Stutson, and Parkway
                             intersection. This alternative would probably also reouire the
                             widening of Stutson Street between the River and Lake Avenue,
                             which would be a considerable disruption to that neighborhood,
                             given the right-af-way width and the setbacks of buildings.

                             Alternative #2 would involve a new bridoe constructed to the south
                             OT tne existi7ng bridge. This new bridge would align with tne Lake
                             Ontario State Parkway on the west side and end at Thomas Avenue on
                             the east side.

                             Alignment of the bridge, however, with the existing Parkway would
                             constitute condemnation of up to 15 parcels, some of which have
                             potential for State Historic Preservation Office listing.

                             Since the major contributor to traffic congestion in the area is
                             the bridge when opened, the following options apply to either of
                             the previous alternatives:

                             Ootion I would involve keeping the approximate 24 foot vertical
                             c7e-arance that the existing bridae has; this does nothing to
                             alleviate problems for vehicles or boat traffic because of the
                             high frequencies of bridge openings.

                             Option II would involve constructing a movable bridge with 54 foot
                             vertical clearance above mean water level in the closed position.
                             This would allow passage of approximately 50 to 75 percent of the
                             sailboat fleet in the closed position.
                             Option III would involve constructing a movable bridge with 64
                             foot ver7cal clearance above mean water level in the closed
                             position. This would allow passage of approximately 100 percent of
                             the sailboat fleet in the closed position. This height, as well as
                             Option II, could present some grade problems on the east side of
                             the River.

                             Option IV would involve constructing a fixed bridge with 100 foot
                             vertical clearance above mean water level. This option does not
                             seem feasible from a financial standpoint, and presents problems
                             resolving gradient changes from the riverbanks to the river navi-
                             gati on channel .


                             ISSUE 6 - IMPROVEMENTS TO IWMRSECTIONS AND STREETSCAPES

                             Many of the views along commercial areas and older residential
                             streets in the Redevelopment Area can be improved. Infill struc-
                             tures developed on vacant lots should respond to the historic
                             character of the area. Some considerations for the impact of new
                             structures on existing neighborhoods include fenestration and
                             facade treatments, building bulk and scale, paving   i  materials,
                             signace, and street planting and furnishings. The various historic
                             and cultural resources of the Redevelopment Area could be coordina-
                             ted by relating them to an overall development scheme, such as
                             distinctive signage and lighting plan for neighborhood streets.
                             The sense of Charlotte as a ilace secluded from the rest of Roches-

                                                             18








                              ter could be used as a point of beginning for favorable tourist
                              publicity, and may become the framework for design decisions
                              concerning the unification of streetscapes.

                              Establishment of a unique thematic concept for the streetscapes
                              and intersections in the redevelopment area is essential. This
                              theme will not only identify the area, but will provide a means of
                              distinguishing this area from the rest of Rochester. This theme
                              could relate the historical significance of structures and land-
                              scapes to the waterfront redevelopment. Existing facades along
                              with proposed new buildings and landscape treatment could accentu-
                              ate this theme. The following are examples which could unify this
                              area into a unique theme:

                              1. Signace - a symbol or insignia could be placed on the street
                                 identification signs in the redevelopment area. This could also
                                 include differences from other Rochester districts, such as the
                                 overall shape of the signs or specific color combinations.

                              2. Trees - trees planted within the right-of-ways would help to
                                 d-niquely characterize the area.

                              3. Sidewalks - either color, finish texture, or some type of plate
                                 or indenture to make them unique.

                              4. Lighting - unique lighting conveying the theme of the redevelop-
                                 ment area.

                              S. Benches and Trash Receptacles - color scheme along with redeve-
                                 lopment insignia could be utilized.


                              ISSUE 7 - RIVER SURGE

                              The river surge problem is caused by Lake Ontario storms from the
                              northeast. These storms are infrequent, but are very damaging when
                              they do occur. According to the Army Corps of Engineers, the river
                              surge is caused by rising lake levels. The highest lake levels
                              occur in the summer. The most dramatic recent change was a 5.2'
                              rise in the base elevation of the lake recorded in June of 1952.
                              Waves generated during a storm are, of course, on top of the
                              raised water level. The height of waves on the high water depends
                              on the distance of lake over which they are blown. Waves of up to
                              10' are not uncommon during such storms. Due to the alignment of
                              the Genesee River to Lake Ontario, damaging waves can travel
                              upstream as far as Stutson Street.

                              The lower Genesee River experiences wave surge primarily caused by
                              storms from north/northeast, because of the alignment of the River
                              to the Lake. It Is not uncommon for waves from the Lake to travel
                              as far south as the Stutson Street Bridge. This wave surge causes
                              physical damage to recreational and commercial craft, along with
                              dan-age to docks and boat launch facilities. This situation must be
                              corrected before any new docks are constructed in this area of the
                              River, especially north of the Stutson Street Bridge to the lake.



                                                          19







                           The following are three alternatives for the correction of the
                           surge problem, along with advantages and disadvantages of each.
                           The first two.alternatives were outlined in a report issued by the
                           United States Army Corps of Engineers in May of 1987.
                           Alternative #1 involves placement of rubble mound facing along
                           both tne west and east piers for the purpose of wave dissipation.
                           This, according to the Army Corps' report, would alleviate 75
                           percent of the wave surge problems.
                           Alternative #2 involves construction of a permanent "dog-lea"
                           structure DUIlTat the nort@ern end of the west pier. This alterna-
                           tive would require additional dredging to accommodate some of the
                           larger commercial traffic.

                           Alternative #3 involves construction of a permanent structure
                           built perpenalcular to the west and east piers. This alternative
                           would include additional dredging, but may also discourage the
                           larger commercial vessels from entering the River.


                           ISSUE 8 - MARKET DEMAND

                           Information regarding the demand for recreational and tourist
                           attractions for the River Harbor Redevelopment Study Area is
                           summarized below. The topics and perspectives presenteO have been
                           gleaned from the LWRP work, a review of prior River Harborfront
                           and City-wide studies, as well as from the consultant team's
                           knowledge of the site and area-wide market conditions.

                           Water Related Uses

                           Among the water related uses identified as appropriate for the
                           River Harbor Area are marinas, boat launch ramps, docks and slips.
                           The Monroe County demand for such facilities is substantial. The
                           County is currently preparing a Waterfront Recreation Opportuni-
                           ties Study. The draft material on Supply Demand Analysis and
                           Development Opportunities, November 1988, Development Planning
                           Services, provides the following information:
                              -   From 1977 to 1987, there was a 30% increase in Monroe
                                  County resident boater registrations. As of 1987, 26.202
                                  boats were registered to County residents.

                              -   Fully 58.6% of those boats were 16 feet or over.
                              -   The County's current supply of commercially available boat
                                  slips is limited to 2,525. There are 4,222 available in
                                  facilities stretching frcm Oak Orchard (Orleans County) to
                                  Fair Haven (Wayne County).
                              -   Adjusting for out of county use, boats docked at homes and
                                  cottages and boats not requiring marina slips (cartops,
                                  etc.), demand for slips is currently at 350 and by 1992,
                                  demand will grow to 880.



                                                           20








                                       @he availability of slips for visitors is negligible in the
                                       County and throuahout the region as defined above.

                                       Based upon an assessment of available boat launch ramps,
                                       user patterns and boater registrations, there is a County-
                                       wide demand for up to 17 additional ramp facilities through
                                       1992. The report specifically cites the Harborfront Area as
                                       a potential location for ramp facilities.

                                In addition to boating related facilities, the draft report pro-
                                vides some guidance on the demand for recreational facilities
                                typically provided by the public sector, beaches and swimming
                                areas and hiking and biking trails. Rochester has the highest use/
                                capacity ratio for swimning in New York State, excepting New York
                                City. The figures demonstrate a need for additional swimming
                                facilities, as well as the heavy use which Ontario Beach Park
                                already receives. Ontario Beach visitation is estimated at 800,000
                                annual visits. (Discovery Center Report, Phoenix Associates, May,
                                1987).

                                There can be no doubt that recreational facilities, such as walk-
                                ways, trails, picnic areas, and playing fields, would be heavily
                                used and would enhance current Ontario Beach Park offerings.

                                The demand for trails, in particular, is also supported by the New
                                York Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Plan, 1983. The Plan
                                states that Monroe County Design Day Capacity far exceeds the
                                state average for biking and hiking activities. (Design Day Capac-
                                ity indicates the degree to which average demand approaches or
                                will exceed daily capacity on the given number of highest use
                                days. NYS Camp. Rec. Plan, 1983).

                                In addition, the Ontario Beac@ Park Program Committee. Inc.
                                (OBPRC) special events calendar has demonstrated the area's abil-
                                ity to attract visitors, given a worthwhile special event. The
                                following provides a brief list of events and visitors.

                                       Event                                      Visitors

                                       Kite Flight Festival - 1 day                 2,000
                                       West Bank Theatre - 9 performances           1@500
                                       Rochester Harbor Festival - 7 days          85:000
                                       Concerts by the Shore - 8 performances      12,000
                                       Lake Ontario Winter Festival                 5,000

                                Water Enhanced Uses

                                The City's 1988 City-wide and Specific Neighborhood Housinc Demand
                                Forecasts Reoor-t-,7-eal Lstate Research Corporation, staies that
                                there couid-Fe-a city-wide demand for 572 additional housing units
                                throug'=95. This projection is made for renter households earn-
                                ing $20,000 or more and owner households earning $35,000 or more.
                                It is also premised upon an increase in the regional rate of
                                growth as well as a substantial increase in the City's capture
                                rate for new Monroe County households. Nevertheless, the Report
                                does state:




                                                                  21









                                The emphasis should be more on trying to modify household
                                trends somewhat by building types of housing that might attract
                                households that would otherwise move to the suburbs, either
                                because they are unlikely to be satisfied with the City's
                                existing housing stock or because the new City housing takes
                                advantage of unique City strengths unavailable in the suburbs.

                              The River Harbor Redevelopment Area, because of its potential for
                              waterfront and boating access, offers the opportunity to meet the
                              stated criteria. Because of the limitations of the market, how-
                              ever, and the City's commitment to residential development at
                              other locations, new unit construction is recommended at no more
                              than 80 units over a five year period.

                              The feasibility of a museum/ i nterpreti ve center was documented in
                              the May, 1987 Discovery Center Report prepared for the City of
                              Rochester by Phoenix Associates. Report findings indicated that
                              such facilities have met with varying success through the Great
                              Lakes Region. The scale and programming of facilities heavily
                              influenced visitation. Visitation to aquariums and hands-on
                              science fa*cilities were substantially higher than visitation to
                              history museums.

                              Visitation estimates for the Harborfront Discover Center ranged
                              between 60,000 and 115,000, depending upon scale, offerings and
                              the seasonality of the facility. T@ese estimates were based upon
                              visitation at Ontario Beach Park, regional attractions and other
                              Great Lakes facilities. The Center is a marketable entity as part
                              of the Harborfront's redevelopment package.

                              A Dicovery Center could become.a key anchor to the redevelopment
                              of the Harborfront. It has the potential to provide:

                                -    A destination point for drawing County and regional visi-
                                     tors and a visible statement as to the changing face of the
                                     Beach;

                                -    The foundation for an expanded year-round market for exist-
                                     ing commercial and limited commercial development at appro-
                                     priate in-fill locations throughout the Harborfront Area,
                                     particularly when linked by well-articulated walkways;

                                 -   An opportunity for the City to demonstrate to the develop-
                                     ment community its commitment to the Ri'ver Harbor redevelop-
                                     ment through the active promotion of such a facility.

                              Current River Harbor commercial uses are heavily weighted towards
                              eating and drinking establishments and convenience goods and
                              services stores catering to residents and beach clientele. Some of
                              the restaurants are long-standing Rochester institutions which
                              maintain a year-round clientele. At the same time, water-related
                              retail support facilities such as bait and tackle, sporting goods
                              and fishing/boating supply stores are in short supply as are any
                              type of specialty-gift related shopping facilities.




                                                                22









                             The lack of such facilities is indicative of the current seasonal-
                             ity of the River Harbor Area as a recreational/tourism center.
                             While the warmer weather months offer many opportunities for
                             substantial numbers of visitors, there is presently little incen-
                             tive to visit the area during the off-season. The restaurants
                             currently provide the only off-season draw.

                             The ability to attract water-enhanced commercial uses is also
                             inhibited by the site's remoteness from other centers of activity,
                             the unattractiveness of some of the existing commercial develop-
                             ment along Lake Avenue and physical barriers between the Beach and
                             other potential activity sites, particularly River Street.

                             With an enhanced waterfront which addresses the issues noted
                             above, retail and service oriented development becomes a viable
                             option. Infill, water-related retail, and food service uses would
                             draw its clientele from the proposed visitor's marina, current
                             boating operations, and the expanding schedule of special events
                             occurring at-Ontario Beach Park. The ability to attract such uses
                             would be substantially enhanced by a year-round attraction sited
                             within the River Harbor Redevelopment Area.

                             If the objective is to improve the planning area's appeal as a
                             seasonal attraction, with little emphasis on year-round destina-
                             tion-oriented activities, new commercial space should be primarily
                             oriented toward food service. The visitor's marina, along with
                             other planned public improvements and the growing numbers of
                             people using Ontario Beach Park, can provide market support for
                             additional restaurants which capitalize upon a waterfront loca-
                             tion.

                             In order for specialty retailing (including gifts, high end mer-
                             chandising, as well as marine related sales) to be successful,
                             sales generation should minimally reach $175 per square foot.
                             Highly successful specialty centers reach sales levels more than
                             twice that figure. (Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents of
                             Shopping Centers; Buland Ordway, "Shopping Center Innovations",
                             Urban Land, June, 1987). Three and one-half million dollars in
                             sales, or J50,000 people spending $10 each on non-food purchases,
                             would have to be achieved to support 20,000 square feet of.special-
                             ty retailing. If the River Harbor Redevelopment Area is to remain
                             a seasonal attraction, non-food retail space should be programmed
                             at no more than 10,000 square feet, particularly considering some
                             of the vacant or marginally used commercial space currently scat-
                             tered throughout the area.

                             Were the River Harbor Area to become a center for year-round
                             activity the potential for additional specialty retail space is
                             enhanced. A Technical Memorandum prepared by Zucchelli, Hunter and
                             Associates, May, 1987 for the Brown's Race Area, stated that this
                             site, adjacent to the Central Business District and to Kodak
                             Headquarters, could support 35,000 to 40,000 square feet of retail
                             space, including food service, through 1995 and up to 102,000
                             square feet through the year 2000. These projections assume a
                             strong local economy and new sales potential driven by an expand-
                             ing population and household base at the County level.


                                                            23









                            The River Harbor Area, while not offering the same iocational
                            attributes as Brown's Race is, in and of itself, a unique and
                            excitina location. While unlikely to capture sales at the same
                            levels as Brown's Race, the addition of a major year-round attrac-
                            tion, the visitor's marina, additional boating slips, public
                            imarovements to the streetscape and reinvestment in existing
                            properties along Lake Avenue and River Street could produce enough
                            visitors and activity to support up to 30,000 sauare feet of
                            non-food related retail space over time.

                            In neither scenario is additional space devoted to convenience
                            goods shopping recommended. Efforts would be better concentrated
                            on improving t@e appearance of existing convenience and service
                            oriented establishments already located within the River Harbor-
                            front. Convenience goods and services businesses are not consider-
                            ed a market of "tourism" draw and exist, particularly when located
                            outside neighborhood shopping centers, to serve the needs of
                            immediate area residents. While the River Harbor Redevelopment
                            Area is borcered by Greece, current population estimated at
                            83,000, that community has ample ooportunities for resident shop-
                            ping within its boraers. To draw these and otlier visitors, River
                            Harbor needs to offer somewhat unique goods and services at vis-
                            ible and accessible locations.

                            The addition of up to 80 new households to the immediate area
                            would not substantially increase the market for convenience shopp-
                            Ing facilities. The Consumer Expenditure Survey, U.S. Department
                            of Labor, 1985, demonstrates that households with annual before
                            tax income of S25,000 spend approximately S4,000 annually on food
                            and beverage, tobacco products, personal care products and ser-
                            vices and non-prescription drugs and supplies. Assuming that all
                            new household dollars were spent in River Harborfront, 80 new
                            households could support only 2,500- square feet of convenience
                            shopping at a minimal productivity level of $125 per square foot.

                            The LWRP recommends a hotel/motel facility for the River Harbor
                            Redevelopment Area. Like expanded retail, a hotel/motel is more
                            likely to occur under a year-round scenario. For it to be included
                            in a seasonal scheme, the level of activity at the Visitor's
                            Marina would have to become more of a known quantity. Addition-
                            ally, a seasonal facility is more likely to occur in tandem with
                            another primary use such as a restaurant.


                            ISSUE 9 - EAST BANK DEVELOPMENT

                            The development of the east shore of the Genesee River directly
                            across from the River Harbor site has been devoted to water-
                            related activity. Oevelopments on the east bank include the east
                            pier and navigation light, the U.S. Coast Guard station near the
                            mouth of the Genesee River, finger piers and lagoon dockage for
                            small pleasure boats, the east side of the swine bridge, Conrail
                            through tracks and side tracks, Genesee Yacht Club dock space, the   10
                            east approach to the lift bridge at Stutson Street, and a sewage
                            disposal plant (not located directly on the waterfront).


                                                            24









                              The view from the east bank would be favorably improved by any
                              development on the west bank that increases recreational     use of
                              that river bank. The east side of the Genesee River has been
                              developed almost entirely for the storage, launching and docking
                              of sailboats. The development of water-related recreational uses
                              for the west bank, especially proposals for increasing the number
                              of boat slips, constitutes the land use most compatible with that
                              of the east bank.

                              Surge control measures proposed in conjunction with west bank
                              developments are likely to have an impact on the east side. Future
                              modeling/study of the surge condition must deal with both sides of
                              the river.


                              ISSUE 10 - PREVIOUS PLANS

                              Schematic and conceptual design plans for the River Harbor Redeve-
                              lopment Study were prepared by the City of Rochester Planning
                              Commission staff in August of 1988. As noted in Task I, the illu-
                              strative plans emphasized unique areas along the Genesee River
                              from the swing bridge south to Petten Street. Waterfront develop-
                              ment included new finger piers, a boardwalk with fishing piers,
                              front end parking located parallel to River Street, and waterside
                              picnic shelters. The plan explored two options for moving the
                              Pelican Bay boat storage south to Petten Street. A boat launch
                              would remain at Pelican day, however, dry storage for boats would
                              be severly limited. A building for the stacked storage of small
                              boats at the proposed Petten Street boat launch would accommodate
                              up to 80 boats.

                              The City staff plans involved a good deal of cutting away of the
                              river bank at the proposed Petten Street boat launch and filling
                              into the river (as much as 25' from the existing shoreline) at the
                              freight train station.

                              The overriding concept in the City plan was the provision of
                              public access to the river. The entire length of river bank was
                              rebuilt as a combination of boardwalk and b.oat docking piers.
                              Small projections of land intended as surge control jettys were
                              planted with trees and used to bring pedestrians to the-water's
                              edge. Parki-ng was provided from the Tape-Can site to the southern
                              terminus of the study area. Infill development in the form of
                              housing and mixed housing and commercial was proposed for vacant
                              sites on River Street.

                              The City of Rochester Office of Planning has summarized its plan
                              in the Explanation of LWRP Policies, Section III, and in Section
                              IV, LWRP Land Use Plan                                       as fol-
                              lows:

                              .The proposed plan takes advantage of the proximity of the site to
                              the Historic Charlotte Lighthouse, as well as the Genesee River
                              and nearby marinas. The plan promotes a variety of water-related
                              commercial and recreational uses in the area. The programming
                              includes construction of boat slips and a public walkway along the



                                                                 25







                            Genesee River, develooment of direct Dunlic access to the Licht-
                            house, construction of picnic facilities and open space areas
                            along the river, and provisions for additional parking and more
                            efficient vehicular circulation in the area. The plan also identi-
                            fies several buildinas and structures in the area that could be
                            redeveloped or rehabilitated for appropriate water-reiated commer-
                            cial uses.
                            The City of Rochester will encourage and promote the develODment
                            of various commercial and recreational uses within the Lake Avenue
                            commercial district that will support and enhance the land uses
                            and development activities on the Port Site and at Ontario Beach
                            Park. In addition to the rehabilitation of major buildings, the
                            City will give consideration to providing off-street parking areas
                            and streetscape amenities such as tree plantings, landscape fea-
                            tures, street furniture and unique pavement treatments.
                            The City of Rochester has developed a proposal to rehabilitate the
                            River Street Site, including the 5 acre railroad riaht-of-way
                            property recently acouired from Conrail . This development plan
                            enhances the facilities and activities proposed for the Port
                            Authority Site while creatina a unioue and distinctive area alona
                            River Street that takes aavantage of the reuse opportunities for
                            existing buildings.
                            The plan recommends that local demand for boat slips be addressed
                            through the development of up to 200 new slips along the Genesee
                            River, in an area that extends from the swing bridge south to the
                            Petten Street extension. In addition, the plan proposes the con-
                            struction of a riverwalk promenade or pedestrian path along the
                            river that could potentially connect or link the site with the
                            Port area to the north. The pedestrian walkway would also provide
                            access to new open space and picnicking areas to be developed
                            alono the river. These areas would include new picnic shelters and
                            river overlooks. Enhancements to the Charlotte Lighthouse and
                            surrounding area, that involve creation of additional open space,
                            a pedestrian connection to the river, and additional parking
                            areas, are included in the plan. Rehabilitation of the existing
                            railroad station into a unique riverside restaurant is also pro-
                            posed in the plan. Finally, adaptive reuse of existing vacant
                            commercial structures in the area is envisioned as a major,part of
                            the overall redevelopment of the River Street Site.
                            The proposed redevelopment plan for River Street and the former
                            Conrail property meets many of the LWRP policy goals and state-
                            ments contained in Section 111, as well as additional overall
                            objectives that were developed by City staff, committee members
                            and citizens. The plan would also implement the specific land use
                            recommendations for-;the River Street Site that are contained in
                            LWRP Policies Section'iV. The plan promotes tourism, enhances the
                            City's image as a recreation center and waterfront attraction,
                            strengthens the economic base of the region, promotes public
                            access to the shore zone, and increases the amount and type of
                            water-related recreational activities and opportunities.





                                                              26














                                                           MEMORANDUM




                             DATE:   December 19, 1988

                             RE:     Rochester River Harbor Redevelopment Feasibility, Study


                                                TASK IY: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES


                             This memorandum summarizes goals and objectives for the River
                             Harbor Redevelopment Area. The goals are a compilation of broad
                             intentions fo-r the River Harbor Redevelopment Area as identified
                             by the City of Rochester Planning Commission staff, the LWRF
                             C i ti ze n' s Advi sory Commi ttee, and consul tants. The objecti ves are
                             courses of action, consistent with LWRP policies, that will result
                             in the realization of goals for the Genesee River waterfront. The
                             goals and objectives provide the conceptual framework for specific
                             strategies and tactics. The strategies are guidelines for specific
                             actions. The tactics are treatments detailed to serve particular
                             needs. In the overall organization of the River Harbor Redevelop-
                             ment Study, the goals and objectives generally describe the inten-
                             tions of the 'study.


                             1. GOAL: Improve public access to the riverfront. (CS/RBP/CAC).*

                                OBJECTIYES:

                                a.   Maximize pedestrian access along a waterfront boardwalk.
                                     (CAC). LWRP Policy 20A - Comprehensive Trail System.

                                b.   Provide waterfront seating and fishing places. (RBR). LWRP
                                     Policies 22, 22A.

                                C.   Organize and increase the number of existing piers to
                                     accommodate the docking of additional boats. (CS). LWRP
                                     Policies 21, 21A.
                                d.   Improve vehicular access and parking at waterfront. (CS).


                             *NOTE:  CS    City Staff, RBP - Reimann.Buechner Partnership,
                                     CAC    LWRP Citizens' Advisory Committee.





                                                              27








                           2. GOAL: Incorporate historic structures into overall community
                              image. (CS/RBP).

                              OBJECTIVES:

                              a.   Rehabilitate existing structures, wherever possible.
                                   (CAC). LWRP Policy 1 - Restore, revitalize and r,:@develop
                                   deteriorated and underutilized waterfront areas. LWRP
                                   Policy 1B and 1E.

                              b.   Redevelop vacant and underutilized land and structures
                                   adjacent to the west bank of the Genesee River. (CS) LWRP
                                   Policy 1B.

                              C.   Take historic preservation measures where appropriate.
                                   (CS). LWRP Policies 23, 23A, 238, and 23C.

                              d.   Ensure that develo'pment follows guidelines and standards
                                   for each subarea. (CS). (See Goal 6).

                           3. GOAL: Protect and enhance stable residential and commercial
                              areas. (CAC).

                              OBJECTIVES:

                              a.   Upgrade existing structures and develop vacant lots with
                                   compatible land uses. (CS).
                              b.   Develop water-oriented land uses along River Street. (CS).
                                   LWRP Policy 58.

                              c.   Upgrade commercial developmint an west side of Lake
                                   Avenue. (CS). LWRP Policies 1B and 1C.

                              d.   Develop more specific permit-granting criteria for land
                                   uses within the River Harbor Study Area. (CS).
                           4. GOAL: Protect safety and welfare of waterfront users. (RBP).

                              OBJECTIVES:

                              a.   Provide surge control against northeast storms. (CAC).

                              b.   Provide safe walkways, piers and boardwalk (sturdy, storm.-
                                   proof.' lighted, etc.). (RBP).

                              C.   Route pedestrians to avoid potential hazards and unneces-
                                   sary safety risks. (RBP).





                                                            28








                              S. GOAL: Increase public water-enhanced or water-dependent recrea-
                                 tional opportunities. (CAC).

                                 OBJECTIVES:

                                 a.    Incorporate recreation as a land use in waterfront develop-
                                       ments. (CS).

                                 b.    Provide access for fishing an west bank of Genesee River.
                                       (CS). LWRP Policies 22 and 22A.

                                 C.    Develop more boat slips and launch ramps along the Genesee
                                       River. (CS). LWRP Policies 1F; 19, 19C, 19F; Policy 20,
                                       20B and 20C.

                              6. GOAL: Develop and implement a theme or set of subthemes to
                                 direct the desion concepts for the River Harbor Study Area.

                                 OBJECTIVES:

                                 a.    Delineate general design guidelines that clearly articu-
                                       late the thematic goal for Site Development, Architectural
                                       Development, Landscape Development, and Signage. (RSP).
                                 b.    Develop design standards that express means of achieving
                                       guideline recommendations. These should be specific for
                                       each subarea. (RBP).
                              7. GOAL: Enhance maritime ambience an River Street. (CAC).

                                 OBJECTIVES:

                                 a.    Develop site details and ameiities with theme that res-
                                       pects the area's historic use in shipping  .activity. (CS).
                                       LWRP Policy 23 - especially uthe enhancement of the exist-
                                       ing "neighborhood" and "nautical" character and ambience
                                       already present In the area".
                                 b.    Ensure that development follows guidelines and standards
                                       for subareas 8 and E. (CS). (See Goal 6).
                              8. GOAL: Improve traffic circulation in River Harbor Redevelopment
                                 Area.

                              OBJECTIVES:

                                 a.    Develop specific strategies to improve levels of service
                                       at congested intersections.
                                 b.    Resolve parking demands and projected needs resulting from
                                       proposed redevelopment.
                                 c.    Resolve traffic volume impacts resulting from proposed
                                       redevelopment.



                                                                29
















                                                       MEMORANDUM


                           DATE:   January 11, 1989

                           RE:     Rochester River Harbor Redeveloment Feasibility Study


                                                TASK V: THEMATIC CONCEPT


                           This memorandum specifies thematic concepts for the River Harbor
                           Study Area. The concepts coordinate the efforts of the consulting
                           team, City PTanning staff, the LWRP Citizen's Advisory Committee,
                           and the Charlotte Cormunity Association (CCA),

                           The procedure for coordination of thematic concepts involved a
                           series of meetings between the City staff, consulting team, and
                           citizens' groups in December of 1988. The CCA developed a consen-
                           sus during its regular meetings in late 1987. The following thema-
                           tic concepts result from the process of reviewing project issues
                           and concerns, goals and objectives, local history, and information
                           from citizens' meeting discussions.

                           The overall theme for the River Harbor Redevelopment Area shall be
                           a Time Theme expressive of the turn-of-the-century heyday, Design
                           concepts shall recall this era of livoly waterfront activity.

                           In order to facilitate the design process for thematic concepts,
                           the Feasibility Study subareas have been Combined from five sub-
                           areas to two. The new subareas' boundaries (see map) were based on
                           land use, topography, zoning and thematic distinctions. Subarea A
                           combined prior Subareas A, C, and 0 from previous tasks. Subarea 8
                           combined prior Subareas 8 and E from previous tasks. Subarea A
                           shall be developed with a Village Time Theme; Subarea 8 shall be
                           developed with a Nautical Time Theme.

                           On Lake Avenue, the turn -of - the-century Time Theme shall be rea-
                           lized as a reinforcement of the village-like character present
                           there. The impression of "village" is conveyed by small-scaled
                           residences, local shops and services, churches, fire station; post
                           office, and historic police station. The diversity of land uses
                           will be retained and augmented in reinforcing this village charac-
                           ter. Specific recommendations fo@ appropriate scale and materials
                           for buildings, as well as streetscape detailing, are presented in
                           Task VI, Guidelines and Standards. Appropriate land uses in Sub-
                           area A include commercial and residential development, park
                           areas, pedestrian ways, sitting areas, and parking facilities.



                                                             31








                          On River -Street, the turn-of-the-century Time Theme shall have a
                          maritime character. The maritime ambience of the waterfront is
                          created by t@e presence of sailboats and motor boats, the freight
                          trains, swing bridge, fire boat, lighthouse, docks, and marina
                          operation. Waterfront activity will be encouraged through the
                          development of water-related and water-enhanced uses. Appropriate
                          land uses in Subarea B include mixed commercial and residential
                          development, playground spaces, picnic areas, fishing piers, boat
                          docks, boardwalk/pedestrian trails, parking, marina facilities,
                          and specialty retail development.

                          Facade and architectural treatments shall be detailed with ele-
                          ments appropriate to the overall Time Theme in both subareas.
                          Landscape and streetscape desion shall also incorporate elements
                          expressive of the Time Theme. Specific stratecies for accomplish-
                          ing the Time Theine, along with examples o@ appropriate design
                          elements are included in Task VI.




































                                                          32













                                                   MEMORANDUM


                       DATE:   February 14, 1989

                       RE:     Rochester River Harbor Redevelopment Feasibility Study


                                         TASK IX: POLICY RELATIONSHIPS


                       The redevelopment design solutions were produced by the consultant
                       team in close coordination with the City of Rochester Planning
                       staff and the LWRP Citizen's Advisory Committee. The results of
                       this effort were schematic plans and concepts which implement
                       specific LWRP policies. The River Harbor Redevelopment Design.and
                       Feasibility Study was intended as a tool to provide the means of
                       carrying out relevant LWRP policies. The LWRP policies and Explana-
                       tion of Policies are presented in Appendix A.

                       The guidelines and standards were related to specific LWRP poli-
                       cies. These relationships, as they pertain to design controls for
                       the anticipated Street Corridor, Architectural, Site, and Sicnage
                       developments are summarized In the charts which follow this iext'.
                       LWRP Policies 1, 2, 5, 9, 20, 21, and 22 were related to all four
                       categories of development and were therefore universally appli-
                       cable in this study. Similarly, Policies 1B, 1C, 1E, and 58 ap-
                       plied to all four categories of design controls (see Appendix A
                       LWRP Policies for an explanation of the City of Roc@ester LWRP
                       policies). The relationships between the Design Guidelines and
                       Standards were identified and summarized in the "Task IX LWRP
                       Policies Chart". The chart states the River Harbor Gui-deiines and
                       summarizes tne Standards which apply to each Guideline. Relevant
                       LWRP Policies are then related to those Guidelines and Standards.
                       Policies 23, 23A, and 23B related directly to the Architectural
                       Restoration Standards. Policies 19C and 20C were directly appli-
                       cable to boardwalk/trail system standards.

                       The Redevelopment Parcels were matrixed with the LWRP policies to
                       determine the relationship of policies to proposed developments.
                       The policies were then arranged in order of applicability, in a
                       range from the most widely applicable policies on the left to the
                       least applicable policies on the right. The Redevelopment Parcels
                       were ranked from the most appropriate form of development at the
                       bottom of the column (refer to Task IX LWRP Policy Matrix). The
                       developments most compatible with the LWRP policies were shoreline
                       or water-reTated development. The Riverfront Park proposal was in
                       closest aoreement with LWRP policies.



                                                        33











                                                 CONCLUSIONS


               The following discussion summarizes specific design recommendations and poli-
               cies resulting from Task VIII, Schematic Design, of the Design and Feasibility
               Study. It is organized into three sections; Program, Design and Policy. The
               plans and policies referred to in the discussion of these results can be found
               in this section immediately following the text.


                                                    PROGRM


               Task VIII resulted in the production of a schematic plan for the redevelopment
               of the River Harbor Study Area. Prior to drawing up final recommendations, a
               program was recommended for each redevelopment parcel. The redevelopment
               programs were adjusted after meetings with City Planning staff, the LWRP
               Citizen's Advisory Committee, the Charlotte Community Association, and the
               City of Rochester Development Committee. The following program resulted from
               the process of discussion and revision.


               PELICAN BAY - PARCEL A

                    Sales Showroom and Services 5,200 square feet
                    Dry Boat Storage 35 boats
                    Parking - 7 cars


               LIGHTHOUSE MUSEUM PARK - PARCEL B

                    Pedestrian and Bicycld Trail
                    Picnic Grounds
                    Handicapped Accessible Routes
                    Overlook


               LIGHTHOUSE STREET - PARCEL C

                    Parking - 42 parallel spaces + 3 handicapped
                    Visitor Drop-off


               TAPE-CON - PARCEL D

                    New Retail - 16,800 square feet
                    Adaptive Reuse Retail - Ust floor Tape-Can office building) 4,200 square
                                              feet
                    Paiking    103 front end spaces
                               30 spaces in garaces at townhouses
                    Housina    15 townhomes at 2,000 square feet
                               3 flats (2nd floor Tape-Con office building) at 1,400 square
                               feet




                                                            34









                  RIVERFRONT PARK - PARCEL E


                       Boardwalk
                       Adaptive Reuse - Restaurant at 5,500 square feet
                       Restaurant Boat Dock
                       Restaurant Deck
                       Fishing Pier
                       Picnic Shelters, Play Sculpture
                       Parking - 253 front end spaces


                  RIVER STREET INFILL - PARCEL F

                       Mixed Use New Retail      (on around level) 16,500 square feet
                       Existing Commercial     (1st fioar) 8,025 square feet
                       Parking - 42 front end spaces
                               - 36 spaces in garages at townhouses
                       Adaptive Reuse - 15 flats (2nd floor above existing     commercial) at 1,600
                                         square feet
                       Mixed Use Housina - 11 tcwnhomes (above new retail)      at 2,400 souare feet
                                             each
                       Housing - 10 walkouts at 2,000 square feet each
                               - 8 townhomes, two story, at 2,000 square feet each


                  RAIL LANDS - PARCEL G

                       Stacked Boat Storage - 30 to 40 boats
                       Parking - 39 front end spaces
                       Fishing Pier


                  LAKE AVENUE INFILL - Typical Site

                       Proposed Retail     5,600 square feet
                       Proposed Parking     25 offstreet spaces


                                                         DESIGN


                  The proposed program elements are summarized in the redevelopment statistics
                  chart which follows. The chart indicates retail, housing, parking, and boating
                  redevelopment recommendations for each redevelopment site (Parcels A-G). The
                  total proposed redevelopment for each program element is indicated at the
                  bottom of the chart. In addition to the program for redevelopment, other
                  redevelopment design solutions were discussed at City staff and community
                  meetings. The alternatives outlined in Task VII were debated, and the schema-
                  tic plan reflects the result of this dialogue. The following discussion refers
                  to the Task VIII schematic plan as it outlines the consultant's design recom-
                  mendations.






                                                            35










                                                                    REDEVELDPIalEM PROGRAM ELEME14TS

                                                                                    7
                                                  Retail               Housing               Parkl_nj            Boats

        Pelfcan Day - Parcel A                      5,200  s.f.                                   7              3S dry storage

        Lfghthouse Museum Park       Parcel 0         -                                           -


        Lighthouse Street - Parcel C                  -                                          45


        Tape-Con - Parcel n                       21,000 s.f.          15 Townhomes             103
                                                                       5 Apartments


        Riverfront Park - Parcel E                  S.500 S.f.                                  253              213 at docks


        River Street - Parcel F                   24,52S s.f.          29 Townhomes              42
                                                                       15 Apartments

        Rail Lands     Parcel G                                                                  39              35 dry storage

                                                  56.225 s.f.          44 Townhomes             489s             283 boats
                                                                       20 Apartments



   REDEVELOPMENT STATISTICS C"AfIT







                PEDESTRIAN CIRCUUTION

                Pedestrian traffic through the redeveloped waterfront was implemented with two
                basic concepts in mind; first, that waterfront visitors should have the maxi-
                mum possible access to the riverbank; second, that the pedestrian trail system
                should incorporate a series of loops which offer several routing choices to
                visitors. The pedestrian circulation routes are comprised of the existing
                sidewalk grid and proposed sidewalks and asphalt trails. Wherever possible,
                the pedestrian crossina of the Conrail tracks was combined with vehicular
                crossings. Of the nine- proposed pedestrian crossings, seven are incorporated
                with road crossings. The following narrative highlights key features in tte
                proposed pedestrian trail system.

                Connection to Ontario Beach Park

                Visitors to Ontario Beach Park will have direct access to the River Harbor
                Redevelopment Area from the Ontario Beach Park boardwalk or parking lots.
                Pedestrians traveling south along the waterfront are directed west at the
                picnic area to bring them west of the Monroe County boat launch. Benches
                should be provided here to allow views of boat launching activity.

                North Parks

                The walkway continues south around the boat launch staging area, then west
                parallel to the east/west Conrail line. At this point, pedestrians could
                choose a lower route offering close-up views of the marina activity or a
                higher route featuring an overlook platform equipped with benches positioned
                to take advantage of views to the swing bridge or views north to Lake Ontario.
                The lower route leads more directly to the proposed fishing pier, boardwalk,
                and Riverfront Park picnic area. The upper route accesses the Lighthouse Park
                picnic grounds and park proper. Here the visitor is rewarded by sweeping
                vistas of the waterfront from the Genesee Yacht Cub to the Summerville Pier on
                the east bank, and from the train station to Ontario Beach park an the west
                bank. There are five options for pedestrians leavihg the lighthouse. They are
                the following connections:

                     1)  West to Lake Avenue through the Holy Cross parking lot.

                     2)  East to Riverfront Park parking lot, on through the proposed stair-
                         way (Note existing stairway needs replacing).
                     3)  South to River Street by following the slope down past the proposed
                         Tape-Con redevelopment site.

                     4)  South to Latta Road via Lighthouse Street.

                     5)  North to Ontario Beach parking lots via the routes described above.

                Waterfront Park

                The Waterfront Park was conceived as a linear green strip with a continuous
                boardwalk immediately adjacent to the riverbank. Key features incorporated
                into the proposed pedestrian system include the following:





                                                     37







                   Fishing piers an both ends of the restaurant deck. During the springg
                   summer and fall seasons, the deck would be utilized for outdoor dining by
                   patrons, with most of the deck cordoned-off and occupied by tables and
                   chairs. During the off-season, the deck could be utilized by pedestrians
                   as part of the boardwalk system.

                   Proposed reuse of the west abutment of the Stutson Street Bridge. The
                   existing bridge structure couto-S-epartially dismantled with the west
                   abutment rebuilt as an overlook. A human-scaled railing and wooden deck-
                   ing could replace over-sized or inappropriate materials to create a
                   pedestrian node. This could be developed in conjunction with the closure
                   of portions of the Stutson Street/River Street intersection, resulting
                   from the bridge relocation plan.

                   Also in conjunction with the bridge relocation plan, new walkways/bike-
                   way. These would allow for non-vehicular traffic across t e river on-79F
                   W-ew bridge. A switchback ramp and stair is proposed to bring pedestrians
                   from the upper level at River Street or from the proposed new bridge down
                   to the lower level near the railroad tracks. This would allow waterfront
                   access for people crossing the new Parkway bridge without necessitating
                   a Iona walk to Lake Avenue and back to River Street.

                   A forty-foot wide fishina pier. The deck-like fishing area would allow
                   fishermen access       tne uenesee Klver that would be sheltered from
                   weather by the Parkway bridge.

                   Pedestrian reststop. At the point where the tee docks begin, the board-
                   walk is wid-enecand a gazebo is provided. This area should be furnished
                   with benches, a drinking fountain, trash receptacles, an information
                   kiask, etc.

                   Proposed sitting area. The boardwalk continues south to the stacked boat
                   storage f-Milty. A sitting area is proposed for the north end of the
                   facility to allow onlookers views of the launching procedure. Bays at
                   either end of the storage tuilding could be left open so visitors can
                   watch the high-tech launching equipment in operation.

                   Fishing pier and oazebo. The southern terminus to the waterfront park is
                   providea with a fisMng pier and landside shelter. The 15     1 open deck of
                   the pier will allow ample room for snag-free casting. From this.*point,
                   the boardwalk would continue south along the riverbank past the Spirit of
                   Rochester mooring to the marina area., An optional asphalt path could
                   parallel the train tracks, giving bicyclists and pedestrians a connection
                   south to Turning Point Park.

               Lighthouse Street

               The west side of Lighthouse Street is provided with a pedestrian walk and
               planting strip. The north terminus of Lighthouse Street is a turn-around for
               vehicles with a convenient drop-off area that interfaces with Lighthouse Park
               via a short walkway. This walkway or the one on the west side of Lighthouse
               Street could be integrated with the Holy Cross Church path system, but are
               currently planned as an autonomous route operating independently of the
               church/school complex. There is also potential for coordinating school bus
               drop-off, automobile parking, service access, and playground development with
               public improvements on Lighthouse Street and the Lighthouse Park.


                                                        38









              River Street Infill Site

              Pedestrians are provided with a grid-type sidewalk system that allows for
              connections east to Lake Avenue and north/south between Stutson Street and
              Latta Road. There is a walk provided in front of all proposed mixed retail
              housing units, and landscaoed front yards for all strictly residential tzwn-
              homes. The parking lot adjacent to the retail sidewalks could be surfacec with
              interlocking pavers to create a pedestrian mall , which could be utiloized
              during festival events for uses other than parking. The major east/wes-c con-
              nection throuqh the infill site is an sidewalks provided along Whitney r'ice.


              YEHICULAR CIRCULATION

              The existing road pattern remains unchanged, with the exception of chances to
              Stutson Street, Lake Ontario State Parkway (L.O.S.P.) and River Street. Major
              changes are proposed for these streets. As noted above, the schematic plan
              proposes changes to Lighthouse Street, modifying the north terminus of the
              street to a turn-around and passenger drop-off area. Curb cuts would allow
              direct wheelchair access to the path system. The following narrative high-
              lights major design recommendations for Stutson Street, L.O.S.P. and River
              street.


              Lake Ontario State Parkway

              The Parkway is planned to be extended eastward through existing residential
              areas, across River Street and over the Genesee River. To minimize the impact
              on this residential area, the consultants recommend that the center median be
              removed prior to crossing Lake Avenue. This would substantially reduce the
              right-of-way width and thereby minimize the taking of properties. As outlined
              in Task 111, Option II is the consultants' preferred bridge replacement op-
              tion. It involves the construction of a 54' vertical clearance lift bridge.
              The proposed bridge approach crosses Lake Avenue it a signalized, at-grade
              intersection. The four-lane road, with sidewalks and bike paths for both east-
              bound and westbound traffic crosses River Street with an 8 foot vertical
              clearance. As mentioned in the preceding discussion, a pedestrian ramp or
              stair would allow bridge users to move directly between the bridge and River
              Street. The new bridce would tie-in an the west shore to the existing bridge
              interface at Pattonwood Drive.

              River Street/Stutson Street

              In conjunction with this new bridge, several alternatives for River Street
              near the Stutson Street intersection were considered. These are outlined in
              Task VII. The option preferred by the neighborhood groups was to cul-de-sac
              River Street. The dead end would change the intersection of Stutson Street and
              River Street by allowing only one turning option for each street, since both
              streets would be dead ends (recall that the Stutson Street Bridge is scheduled
              for demolition and removal). Both streets would become accessways for local
              traffic only in the proposed plan.






                                                        39










                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        -I, --jj




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       ma



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ;41 A
                                                                       3. 2z                                                                                                                                                                                                                      i                                                                                                                   CPO

                                                                                                                                aL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  FG#W






















                                                                             View Looking South                                                             Along River Street









                River Street

                The north terminus for River Street is proposed as a through connection to
                Ontario Beach Park parking lots. The new street alignment would parallel the
                existing north/south Conrail tracks, then cross the east/west tracks to con-
                nect with the parking lots and Hincher Street entrance to the Park. The pro-
                posed extension of River Street could be controlled by one way si,-nage. The
                schematic plan illustrates an alignment which would prevent vehicles with
                trailers from turning left at the intersection of the River Stree!_- extension
                and the boat launch parking accessway. This intersection would alsc oe signed
                "No Left Turn". The improved access and circulation gained by extending River
                Street north to Ontario Beach Park parking lots, when comparen with' dead-
                ending River Street at a parking lot (see discussion in Task VII), would
                result in a higher degree of safeiy. Police, fire, ambulance, and service
                vehicles such as trash trucks and delivery vans, would be aided in providing
                emergency service or regularly scheduled services. Pedestrian safety in cross-
                ing the east/west Conrail tracks would be increased due to the additional
                warning signals for oncoming trains necessitated by a road crossing.


                PARKING


                A major concern for the redevelopment of the Genesee River waterfront was the
                provision of adequate parking. The overall concept which guided the develop-
                ment of parking areas was the concept of shared or overlapping use of spaces.
                To minimize the paving of land adjacent to the waterfront for parking, some
                uses would share the same spaces during different time periods. For example,
                mixed-use townhouse parking at two spaces per unit for night parking would be
                reduced to one space during business hours. For prime hours of operation, the
                retail businesses would utilize these spaces for customer shopping. With the
                exception of the mixed-use townhomes, all townhouse development will include
                two-car garages with optional driveway parking for the exclusive use of town-
                home owners.

                Parking, as denoted on the sc@ematic plan, is summarized below:

                     Pelican Say - Parcel A

                          Parking AA           7 front end spaces

                     Lighthouse Street - Parcel B

                          Parkina FF           42 parallel spaces
                                               3 handicapped spaces

                     Tape-Con - Parcel D

                          Parking CC           103 front end spaces
                          Townhomes            30 garage spaces
                                               30 driveway spaces



                                                  41








                     Riverfront'Park - Parcel  E

                          Parking Be           28 front end spaces
                          Parking DD           63 front end spaces
                          Parking 11           72 front end spaces
                          Parking JJ           90 front end spaces

                     Stutson Street            100 parallel spaces

                     Latta-Road                80 parallel spaces

                     River Street Infill - Parcel F

                          Parking GG           42 front end spaces
                          Townhomes            36 garages spaces
                                               36 driveway spaces
                          Parking HH           30 parallel spaces

                     Rail Lands - Parcel G

                          Parkinc KK           39 front end spaces
                          Stacked Storage      40 pigeon-hole spaces

                     PARKING SUMMARY

                          Lots                      444  spaces
                          On-Street:
                               Stutson Street       100  spaces
                               River Street          30  spaces
                               Latta Road            80  spaces
                               Lighthouse Street-    45  spaces
                               River Street Ext.     50  spaces
                                                    jut  spaces

                          Stacked Storage            40  spaces
                          (in racks)

                                          TOTAL     789  spaces provided
                          Note: Private parking for townhome owners not included in the-above
                          summary is as follows:

                          Townhomes (in garages)     66 spaces
                          Townhomes (in driveways)   66 spaces
                                                    132 spacel


                BOATING

                The proposed schematic plan provides dockage for 214 boats, plus dry storage
                for 80 and temporary docking at the restaurant deck for 4-5 boats. Currently,
                98 boats are serviced in the study area. The dramatic increase in intensity of
                shoreline use will likely increase the demand for parking. As noted above, the
                248 waterfront parking spaces proposed in this redevelopment plan will hardly
                be adequate for boaters' needs. In calculating the parking demand created by


                                                     42






               boaters (at 2 spaces per slip) versus the available spaces, it is apparent
               that the demand can be met by sharing spaces provided in parking areas CC, FF,
               and GG.

               The facilities proposed for boaters include a sales showroom, boat servicing
               outfit, launching ramp and dry storage yard at Pelican Bay, finger piers from
               this marina south to the proposed new L.O.S.P. bridge, and 10 tee docks south
               of the proposed new bridge. The tee docks were planned as permanent struc-
               tures, but further study could show that the spring ice break-up flowing from
               upstream may necessitate floatina docks or piers with some removable sections.
               At the southern end of the study area a stacked boat storage facility is
               recommended. This facility would allow boats to be stored in pigeonhole com-
               partments during all seasons. This service was proposed for up to 40 boats,
               but demand may actually be up to four times this number. Advantages for boat-
               ers choosing the dry storage system include less bottom pai.nting, less general
               maintenance, longer outdrive life, peace of mind, convenience, and greater
               resale value for boats. Of the several available types of rack storage facili-
               ties, the consultants recommend an enclosed structure, such as that manufac-
               tured by Acco Chain and Liftinc. This facility utilizes electric indoor lift-
               inq equipment which is designed to operate along a ceiling-mounted track. The
               system will reduce safety risks to bystanders and objectionable noise which
               may be present in other types of rack storage facilities, especially where
               those facilities depend on lift trucks.

               Boat Docking Summary

                     North of Stutson Street:

                          Finger Piers                81 boats
                          Restaurant Deck             4 boats

                                          Subtotal    85 boats

                     South of Stutson Street:

                          Finger Piers                10 boats
                          Tee Docks                 118 boats

                                          Subtotal  128 boats

                     Dry Storage at Pelican Bay       35 boats
                     Stacked Storage                  35 boats

                                          Subtotal 70 boats

                     Total Number of Boats Accommodated = 283 boats.












                                                         43













                                                                                                                                                                               LWRP POLICIES
                                                    GUIDELINES                                                 STANDARDS

                                                                                       LOT COVERAGE:    Commercial         SCS maximum                  NOTE: The following policies are generally related t
                                   Define relationship of buildings to                                  Nixed-Use          80% Maximum                                                                               o all design
                                   public spaces and circulation systems.                               Residential                                            guidelines and standards. Policy 23A and 23B are s          pecfffc
                                                                                                                           45% Maximum                         to restoration activity, Policy 19C and 20C a           re specific
                                                                                       FRONTAGE:        Commercial         90% Maximum                         for trail development.
                         0         Promote a continuous blockface.                                      Nixed-Use          901 maximum
                         93                                                                             Residential        80% Maximum                  POLICY 18 - Redevelop vacant and underutilized land and struc-
                         EC                                                        -                                                                    tures aiRg River Street a4jacent to the west bank of the Genesee
                         cc                                                                                                                             River to include water-oriented commercial and recreational uses.
                         0         Protect pedestrian corridors from en-               SETBACK:         Commercial         0-20 feet
                         L)        croachment by buildings.                                             Mixed-Use          0-20 feet
                                                                                                        Residential        5-20 feet                    POLICY IC - Upgrade existing commercial uses located along the
                                                                                       PARKING:         Restaurant         16                           west side   .of Lake Avenue 1himediately adjacent to the Port site.
                                   Provide for off-street parking and                  Ispaces per      Mixed-Use          4                            POLICY IE - Promote and encourage appropriate reuse and/or redev-
                                   service requirements.                               1,000 square     General Retail     4                            e'='        options for vacant Industrial land located along the
                                                                                       feet)            Boating            2per slip                    Ge       River.
                                   feinforce the overall character of the                               Residential        2per unit                    POLICY 5B - Promote and encourage appropriate water-ortented
                                   Redevelopnent Area.                                 ACCESS:          One Way            10 feet                      aeve        nt along River Street, north of the          Stutson Street
                                                                                       (entry widths)   Two Way                                         Bridge, and upgrade the existing infrastructure In the area.
                                                                                                                           to feet


            la.                                                                        FACADE:          30'.<glass<50%
                                   Protect ti,e existing character in River            14ATERIALS:      Wood, brick, stone, cast Iron. Pro-             POLICY 18. IC, IE, 56. and 23
                                   Harbor neighborhoods through the appro-                              hibited materials: tinted glass,
                                   priate use of scale, color, materials.                               vinyl/aluminum siding. grooved ply-
                                   and detailing for buildinos facing the                               wood, fake stone.                               POLICY 19E - Promote and encourage Increased public access to the
                                   street corridors.
                         _J                                                                                                                             waterfront and to various recreational resources and facilities
            0                                                                                                                                           at the Port Authority Site ind at the River Street Site through
                         <                                                             EXTERIOR WALLS: 15%<glass<30%                                    the implementation of a water-oriented. mixed-use development
                                                                                                                                                        project.

            0
            11.                                                                        HEIGHT:          Lake Avenue        4-story
            a.           L)                                                                             River Street       2-story
                                   Develop in harmony with      subarea themes,                         Mixed-Use          3-story
                                   goals. and objectives.
                                                                                       RES70RATION:     Retain or restore original facade.              POLICY 23A - Identify, protect and restore significant structures
                                                                                                        Appropriate measures: remove un-                T-oc-a-t-e-&-wi thin the local waterfront revitalization boundary. to
                                                                                                        acceptable materials, uncover transom           Include the Charlotte Lighthouse. as well as other buildings
                                                                                                        w1ndows. restore doorways, down-scale           which may be of local significance.
                                                                                                        s gnage, replace lost or damaged
                                                                                                        details.
                                                                                                        __       @@RD
                                                                                                              STANIA @S
                                                                                                        Co ercil           SCS Maximum
                                                                                                        Mi:,
                                                                                                                 S,        8
                                                                                                             d                  x

















                                   Create and reinforce an overall Identity                                                                             POLICY 238 - Encourage and promote the redevelopnent of the Port
                                   for the River Harbor Redevelopment Area.                                                                             Authority Site and the River Street Site In a manner which is
                                                                                       NOTE:      All   restorations shall follow the latest            compatible with and complements the architectural character and
                                                                                                  revision of the Secretary of the Inter-               integrity of existing structures in the area. to Include consid-
                                                                                                  lor's standards for rehabilitation and                eration of such things as scale, form. density, aesthetics,
                                                                                                  guidelines for rehabilitating historic                building materials, and use.
                                                                                                  buildings.










                                                      GUIDELINES                                               STANDARDS                                         LWRP POLICIES
                                                                   
                                                                                          STREET LIGHTING:      18'  maximum height post and
                                                                                                                luminaire.
                                                                                                                                                         POLICY IB,IC,IE and 5B
                                                                                          FURNITURE:        Cast iron and wood.
                                        Create a unified and consistent image                                                                            POLICY 19C - Increase access to the Genesee River and gorge area
                                        for streetscapes in the Redevelopment             PLANTING:         3-1/2" caliper trees planted 30' on          through the development of a system of formal river overlooks,
                                        Area.                                                               center.                                      hiking and biking trails, pedestrian paths, and other similar
                                                                                                                                                         projects.
                                                                                          SCREEN WALL:      3' minimum, 6' maximum.
                                                                                                                                                         POLICY  2OC - Develop a comprehensive pedestrian trail system that
                                                                                          SCREEN PLANTING:      Used with wall; evergreens,              will provide direct public access to the river, with property
                                                                                                                vines allowable, trees at 15'            located along the east and west banks of the Genesee River, south
                                                                                                                on center.                               of the Stutson Street Bridge, in the vicinity of Turning Point
                                        Clarify edge definitions for pedestrian,                                                                         Park.
                                        planting, and parking zones.
                                                                                          PAVING:    Sidewalks:  concrete scored in 6'
                                                                                                                 squares.
                                                                                                     Trail System: asphalt 6' wide.
                                                                                                     Boardwalk: pressure- treated timber, 10' wide

                                                                                          COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE:

                                                                                               Address sign - 1 per occupant
                                                                                               Home Business sign - 12" x 12" max.
                                                                                                  Advertising - lettering 18'
                                        Enhance thematic concepts for River                          Permanent copy<25%  window area                      POLICY 1B,1C, 1E, 5B, and 23B
                                                                                                   Temporary copy 15% window area
                                        Harbor subareas.
                                                                                                      Rooftop signage prohibited
                                                                                                      Billboards prohibited - 32 s.f. max.
                                                                                                               allowed*                                     NOTES:
                                                                                                      Sign envelope width - 5 foot max.
                                                                                                            Vertical clearance - 8 foot min.                  Only relevant policies have been considered for applicabil-
                                                                                                          Portable signs - 3 ft. x 3 ft. x 4 ft.                   ity.
                                                                                                     Interior-lit or flashing prohibited.
                                         Coordinate informational needs with                                                                                   LWRP Policies 1,2,5,19,20,21 and 22 are addressed by
                                        goals and objectives.                                  Construction sign - 1 per site                                 all four categories and are universally applicable in this
                                                                                                                                                              study.
                                                                                          REGULATORY SIGNAGE:                                                 Any sign larger than 32 square feet is considered out of
                                                                                               Governmental - MYSOOT Manuel of Uniform                        scale and is prohibited.
                                                                                                                Traffic Control Devices'
                                        Express the character of subareas in                   Private Traffic Regulation - 5 ft. x 5 ft.
                                        commercial, regulatory, and informa-                                                  x 8 ft.
                                        tional signage.                                   INFORMATIONAL SIGNAGE:
                                                                                               Political - 45 days before election
                                                                                                               7 days after election
                                                                                               Real Estate - For Sale - 24 hours following
                                                                                                                           sale
                                                                                                               Sold By - 14 days following sale







                                                                                                                  LWRP POUCIES


                         City of Rochester
                         RiverHarbor Fledevelopment Area
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    z
                         Design / Feasibility Study


                         ...... I..Cb-, poll., .... 0.                                                                                               0

                         w.0-4,481.

                               115.90.4ps

                            Pa"", 6

                         9.1g! F,6@4,7


                          1,0119,111, P.1091
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ts
                          I...3,611table POW
                                             0


                            reb,"y 28. 1919-                                                                                                                  JS                                                                                              3

                         TASK IX: LWRP policy Matrix                                                                                                                                         A                                              W               N
                                                                                                                                                                                     0       n                                              N       C4      N
                                                                                                                                                                                             N
                         Appendix A                                                                                                                  C-A      94     CIA             CIA
                                                                                                                     R                                                                                                                      0       0       0        0
                                                                              RIVERFRONT PARK                        0      0        0        0      0       0        0                                                                           - -
                                                          cn                                                         0 0 0 0 0 0 0                                                   0 00                                            0      0       0 0 0
                                                          di                      RAIL LANDS                                                                                                       -
                                                          L)
                                                          cc                                                                                                         o               go                     o o             0        0      0       0                0
                                                          4                     PELICAN BAY                          0               0 0 0                   0                                            - -                      -              -
                                                          (L                                                                                                0 0 o 00 0 0                                            0       00              0       00 0
                                                                       TAPE-CON REDEVELOPMENT                        0 0 0 0
                                                                                                                                                                                                     00             o       so 0                    00 0
                                                                       LIGHTHOUSE MUSEUM PARK
                                                          IL
                                                                                                                                                                            o        0                              000                     0000
                                                          9                            TREET INFILL                                          9       0 0 0
                                                          LL,            RIVER S
                                                                                                                                                                                     go 00                          0       000 0                         -          0
                                                          C)                  LjGjjTtjOUSE STREET                                                                                          - - - -
                                                          w                                                                                                                                  00000.0                                        000 0
                                                          cc                                                                                 0 40 0 0 0
                                                                              LAKE AVENUE INFILL
                                                                   NOTES: Only relevant policies have been considered for applicability.
                                                                   F
                                                                                @:RFF170:
                                                                                  R IL L   NT
                                                                                     A ANC
                                                                              @


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            OU
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   010-0

                                                                              it commendations for each RedeveloPme"t Parcel are specified In the Task
                                                                              Vill Program for RedevelOPment.







                                            CITY OF ROCHESTER
                                 LOCAL VATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAN


                              Legislation Resulting from the Rochester LWRP

                                            TABLE OF CONTENTS




             R-H - River Harbor District    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    49

             O-HTD - Overlay Harbor Town Design District  . . . . . . . . . . . . .    55

             Chapter 112 - Vaterfront Consistency Law   . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    75

             Administrative Procedures for Runoff Control   . . . . . . . . . . . .    85














































                                                    47





                                   City of Rochester
                                   City Clerks Office
                                   Certified Ordinance

                                   Rochester, N.Y.,

                                   TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
         I hereby certify that the following is a true copy oi an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council of
         the City of Rochester on Septmibex 1119 LO and - Appmved                    - by the
                                                     (not disapproved. approved. repassed after disapprovai)
         Mayor of the City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on SePternber 13 '19 LO in accordance
         with the applicable provisions of law.                Ordinance No. 90-364


                               Amending Chapter 115 Of The Municipal
                               Code, Zoning Ordinance, With Respect To
                               Regulations For The R-H River-Harbor
                               District


                  BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:
                  Section 1. Section 115-72 of the Municipal Code, R-H River-Harbor District, as
              amended, is hereby further amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                       Section 115-72. R-H River-Harbor District

                       A.   Purpose. The R-H River Harbor District is intended to preserve and
                            enhance the recreational character of the harbor area at the mouth of
                            the Genesee River; improve the visual quality of the harbor
                            environment; preserve, retain and promotepublic access, both
                            physically and visually to the shoreline; and encourage tourism in the
                            area. While the primary uses of the area are boating and
                            complementary commercial uses which enhance the recre
                            character of the area andprovide conveniences for water-related and
                            shoreline recreational activities are permitted. The development of
                            additional public and private facilities for fishing, boating, swimming,
                            dining, picnicking, strolling and sightseeig is encouraged.
                            Residential land use is permissible to help promote a diversity of land
                            uses and a year round population which will reinforce the village
                            character of the area. The review of development in this district is
                            intended to promote the integration, in -mingling and visual and
                            physical proximity of a variety of activities.

                       B.   Permitted uses.







                                                  49








                              (1)   The following uses are permitted as of right in the R-H River
                                    Harbor District subject, in each case, to site plan approval in
                                    accordance with provisions of Section 115-30 of this chapter:
                                    (a) Public boardwalks, paths and biking trails.

                                    (b) Boating and fishing docks.
                              (2)   The following uses are permitted as of right in the R-H River
                                    Harbor District if located one hundred twenty-five (125) feet or
                                    more from the edge of the Genesee River, subject in each case,
                                    however, to site plan approval in accordance with the provisions
                                    of Section 115-30 of this chapter:

                                    (a) Restaurants and taverns


                                    (b)  Private clubs

                                    (c)  Public parking lots and garages
                                    (d)  The foll=tail shopping and consumer service
                                         establis

                                         [11 Clothing sales
                                         [21   Fish, seafood and specialty food stores
                                         [31   Gift shops
                                         [41   Bicycle sales and rental
                                         [51   Sporting goods sales
                                         [61   Fishing supply stores
                                         [71   Boating and sailing equipment and supplies sales and
                                               rental

                              (e)   Tourist information centers

                              Y)    Museum

                              (g)   Studios for artists and craftsmen
                              (h)   Other establishments relating to and supporting harbor
                                    activities.

                         C.   Accessory uses and structures. Accessory uses and structures are
                              pernn*tted in the R-H River Harbor District subject to the provisions of
                              Section 115-87 of this chapter.



                                                            50








                        D.    Temporary uses. Temporary uses are permitted in the R-H River
                              Harbor District subject to the provisions of Section 115-89 of this
                              chapter.
                        E.    Special permit uses

                              (1)  In addition to uses specified in subsection 115-29E(l), the
                                   following uses and structures may be permitted in the R-H River
                                   Harbor District subject to the issuance of a special permit, as
                                   provided in Section 115-29 of this chapter:

                                   (a)   Any use permitted in Subsection B(2) above when located
                                         within one hundred twenty-five (125) feet of the edge of the
                                         Genesee River.

                                   (b)   Any structure or building over fifteen (15) feet in height.

                                   (c)   Private and commercial recreation and amusement
                                         facilities, subject to the additional standards set forth in
                                         subsection 115-54G(2)(a) and (b) of this chapter.
                                   (d)   Dwellings, subject to all the provisions and regulations
                                         applicable in the R-3 District.

                                   (e)   Fuel sale

                                   (f)   Hotels and motels

                                   (g)   Marinas

                                   (h)   Boat launches

                                   (i)   Coast Guard Stations

                                   (j)   Water passenger transportation terminals
                                   (k)   Boating and sailing instruction schools
                                   (1)   Boat, yacht, canoe, and kayak sales, repair and storage

                                   (m)   Sales and repair of boat trailers

                                   (n)   Boat rental and charter facilities

                         (2) Standards. In addition to standards specified in subsection
                              115-29E(2) and (3) of this chapter, the following additional standards
                              shall be met:

                              (a) The proposed building, structure or use will not unnecessarily
                                   interfere with the passage of boats nor unnecessarily obstruct
                                   public access to riverside parcels.


                                                           51








                             (b)  The proposed design and arrangement of the building, structure
                                  or use will provide for pedestrian access to riverside parcels and
                                  public views of the river to the maximum extent possible.
                             (c)  The proppsed building, structure or use is subject to the parking
                                  and loamng requirements as set forth in Section 115-90 of this
                                  chapter except that the Planning Commission may, in approving
                                  the special permit for any use listed in subsection EM of this
                                  section waive or modify the standards of 115-90 when it finds
                                  that such action is warranted by reason of unique physical
                                  conditions or by the nature and location of the particular
                                  building, structure, or use proposed.

             K         Prohibited uses.

                       (1) All manufacturing uses except for carnivals and circuses as temporary
                             uses.

                       (2)   Warehousing and distribution centers.

                       (3)   Commercial cargo and shipping terminals.
                       (4)   Railroad storage and freight yards.

                       (5)   Adult bookstores, adult entertainment centers and adult film centers.

                       (6)   Auto repair, rental, sales and storage.

                       (7)   Drive-in establishments.

             G.        Bulk, space and yard requirements.

                       (1)   The     .mum hei lit of structures in the R-H River Harbor District
                             shall be 15 feet u2ess a Special Permit is issued as provided for in
                             subsection 115-72E(l)(b).

                       (2)   There shall be no yard requirements in the R-H River Harbor District
                             except for Residential uses as set forith in Section 115-50 of this
                             chapter.

             H.        Parking and loading requirements. Off-street parking and loadmig
                       requirements applicable in the R-H River Harbor District are set forth in
                       Section 115-90 of this chapter.

             I.        Signs. Sign regulations applicable in the R-H River Harbor District are set
                       forth in Section 115-88 of this chapter.







                                                          52











                J.       Use limitations.
                         (1) No specialized retail shopping and consumer service establishment
                               use permitted in subsection 115-72B(2) shall occupy a floor area
                               greater than two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet to conduct
                               its operations and to store its wares, products, inventory and
                               materials.
                         (2)   No oppn-air outdoor storage of construction materials shall be
                               permitted. Refuse and trash may be stored outdoors at all times only
                               if placed in closed containers located in an area screened from view at
                               all points on any public or private property or street when viewed from
                               ground level.

                    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.




                Passed by the following vote:
                Ayes -   President Curran, Councilmembers; Childress Brown, Giess, King, Mains,
                         Muldoon, Norwood, Padilla, Stevenson - 9.

                Nays -   None - 0.



























                                   Attest
                                                         53                             City Clerk






                                              City of Rochester
                                              City Clerks Office
                                              Certified Ordinance

                                              Rochester, N.Y.,

                                              TO WHOM I        T MAY CONCERN:
            I hereby certify that the following is a true copy oi an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council of
            the City of Rochester on SePtembe-r 1119 2-0 and              Approved                                by the
                                                                     (not disapprovea. approvea. repassed after disapprovai)
            Mayor of the City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on SePteMber 13 19 LO in accordance
            with the applicable provisions of law.                                Ordinance No. 90-365

                                        Amending Chapter 115 Of The Municipal
                                        Code, Zoning Ordinance, With Respect To
                                        The Creation Of An 0-HTD Overlay
                                        Harbor Town Design District


                        BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:
                        Section 1. Chapter 115 of the Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, as amended, is
                  hereby further amended by adding thereto the following new Section 115-85-2:
                              Section 115-85-2. - 0-HTD Overlay Harbor Town Design District.
                              A.     Purpose.


                                     (1) General Purpose.
                                     The Overlay Harbor Town Design (0-HTD) District is intended
                                     through the review and regulation of design characteristics, to
                                     promote and facilitate:
                                     a.    a unique village neighborhood theme, character or atmosphere
                                           along the Lake Avenue corridor north of the Lake Ontario State
                                           Parkway, and along Stutson Street and Latta Road, from Lake
                                           Avenue to River Street; and,
                                     b.    a unique maritime theme, character or atmosphere along River
                                           Street north of Fetten Street, and on both sides of the Genesee
                                           River; and,

                                     C.    the protection of significant natural, topographic and physical
                                           features.



                                                                    55








                              The thematic concepts, design regulations, and procedures contained
                              in this section are based on, and are in conformance with, the land use
                              policies and recommendations of the City of Rochester's Local
                              Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP).
                              (2)  Thematic Concepts.

                                   a.    Village Neighborhood Character.
                                   The village neighborhood theme, character or atmosphere shall
                                   be realized through design elements, amenities or treatments
                                   that recreate, enhance or reinforce the village-like character that
                                   existed within the boundaries of the overlay district during the
                                   latter part of the nineteenth century and early part of the
                                   twentieth century. This village-like atmosphere was
                                   characterized by:
                                   [11   smaU-scale residences, shops and buildings along Lake
                                         Avenue that relate directly to the street;
                                   [21   recreational development along the lakeshore and
                                         riverfront that provides.water-dependent or
                                         water-enhanced recreational opportunities;
                                   (31   a diversity of land us es in the area that provide local
                                         services and that encourage and thrive on recreational
                                         development as well as on lively street activity;
                                   [41   ease of pedestrian movement throughout the area and the
                                         deemphasis of the automobile as a means to experience the
                                         area;

                                   [51   signage which relates to pedestrians;
                                   (61   open space and landscaped areas throughout the area that
                                         provide gathering places and physical breaks from
                                         development;
                                   [71   overaU design continuity that creates a sense of boundaries
                                         to the village, resulting in a unique enclave within the
                                         larger community.

                              b.   Maritime Character.

                                   The maritime or waterfront theme, character or atmosphere
                                   shall be realized through design elements, amenities or
                                   treatments that recreate, enhance or reinforce the
                                   water-oriented land uses, activities and ambience that existed
                                   within certain areas of the overlay district during the latter part
                                   of the nineteenth century and early part of the twentieth
                                   century. This maritime ambience was characterized by:




                                                           56








                                      [11   boating act@iviit   d marina operations, docks, wharves,
                                                          .y an
                                            piers and similar uses, the Genesee Lighthouse, and their
                                            associated land use and design amenities;
                                      (21   small-scale residences, shops and buildings in the area
                                            which relate directly to the water or to those streets which
                                            provide access to the water;

                                      [31   a diversity of land uses in the area which provide local
                                            services and which encourage and thrive on a mix of
                                            water-oriented activity as well as on lively street activity;
                                      (4)   ease of visual and physical access to the waterfront
                                            throughout the area;

                                      [51   ease of pedestrian movement throughout the area and the
                                            deemphasis of the automobile as a means to experience the
                                            area;

                                      (61   signage which related to pedestrians.
                                (3)   Specific Goals
                                      The purpose of the Overlay Harbor Town Design (0-HTD)
                                      District established in this section includes the following specific
                                      goals:
                                      (a)   To encourap and promote outstanding design and
                                                            sensitive
                                            CTaIVsA@%^46A._J-         use of design and landscape
                                            features and amenities, and appropriate use of building
                                            materials, detailing and textures;
                                      (b)   To encourage and promote a sense of design continuity that
                                            appropriately relates the historic past of the district to
                                            on-going revitalization and redevelopment efforts, and that
                                            alpr priately relates proposed development to existing
                                             esil@s' structures and land uses;

                                                           ic   identity for and sense of neighborhood
                                      (c)   To create a un jue 1
                                            place along the Lake Avenue, Stutson Street and Latta
                                            Mad corridors, and along River Street adjacent to the
                                            waterfront, that relates to the history of the area, and
                                            reinforces the relationship to the river and lake, as well as
                                            the water-oriented recreational uses located in the district;

                                      (d)   To reestablish or reinforce the visual and physical
                                            relationships between the district and the lakeshore,
                                            riverfront and adjacent harbor areas;








                                                                 57









                                   (e) . To retain and enhance significant views and vistas within
                                         the district, as well as the unique aesthetic or visual
                                         qualities of the area;

                                   (f)   to encourage and promote direct visual and physical access
                                         to and from the river, lake and shore;
                                   (g)   To utilize and enhance significant existing buildings and
                                         structures;

                                   (h)   To restore, complement or enhance existing historic
                                         structures;

                                   (i)   To encourage and promote lively and vibrant street activity
                                         which relates to and reinforces land uses within the district;

                                         To encourage and promote pedestrian movement, access
                                         and circulation throughout the district;
                                   (k)   To utilize a flexible design review process that recognizes
                                         the variety of existing land uses, activities and design
                                         treatments within the district, and provides appropriate
                                         direction and   'dan f )r property rehabilitation or new
                                         development Coughcethce use of the Overlay Harbor Town
                                         Design District Guidelines;
                                   (1)   To reqlp*re the issuance of a Certificate of Design
                                         Compliance by the Director of Zoning for certain types of
                                         redevelopment or new construction within the district,
                                         based on the purpose, goals, and guidelines stated or
                                         referenced herein.

                        B.    Overlay District.
                              The O-HTD District shall not be independently mapped upon the
                              District Zoning Map, but shall be mapped, pursuant to the procedures
                              for amending the District Zoning Map established by Section 115-26 of
                              this chapter, ordv mi com*unction with an underlying Zoning District.
                              When so mapped, the O--HTD District shall provide regulations in
                              regard to design of development and redevelopment additional to
                              those applicable in the underlying districts; provided, however, that
                              any lot may continue to be used in accordance with the regulations
                              M
                              a licable in the underlying district in the same manner as though
                                ePO-HTD District did not exist except as hereinafter restricted.

                        C.    Permitted Uses.

                              Uses as permitted in the underlying district.

                        D.    Accessory Uses and Structures.





                                                                58









                               Accessory uses and structures are permitted in the OHTD District,
                               subject to the provisions of Section 115-87 of this chapter.
                         E.    Special Permit Uses.
                               Special permit uses as specified in subsection 115-29E(l) of this
                               chapter and as specified in the underlying district.
                         F.    Bulk Space and Yard Requirements.

                               Bulk, space and yard requirements shall be as specified in the
                               underlying district.
                         G.    Parking and Loading Requirements.
                               Off-street parking and loading requirements applicable in the O-HTD
                               District are set forth in Section 115-90 of this chapter.

                         H.    Signs.
                               Sign regulations applicable in the OHTD District are set forth in
                               Section 115-88 of this chapter.

                         I.    Use Limitations.

                               Use limitations shall be as specified in the underlying district.
                         J.    Design Review.
                               The mechanism used to accomplish design review within the district
                               shall be the Certificate of Design Compliance. Such certificate shall be
                               required and utilized pursuant to the provisions and standards set
                               forth in Section 115-24.1 of this chapter. In reviewing and deciding
                               upon applications for Certificates of De * C     liance, the Director
                               of Zoning shall be guided by the Overlasylgarboomr Town Design District
                               Guidelines as referenced in this section.

                         K     Design Guidelines.
                               The Director of Zoning shall establish Overlay Harbor Town Design
                               District Guidelines to provide direction and      ce in the review of
                                                                 [gn Con       an
                               a )plications for Certificates of Desi  Mphance. These guidelines
                               s9all be in keeVing with the purpose and goals for the 0-HTD District
                               as established herein.

                    Section 2. Section 115-88 of the Mu     al Code, relating to signs, as amended, is
               hereby further amended by adding thereto e following new subsection Z:
                         Z.    Signs in the 0-HTD Overlay Harbor Town Design District shall be
                               subject to the regulations of the underlying district with the following
                               exceptions:





                                                                59








                             (1)   Advertising signs shall not be permitted in the O-HTD Overlay
                                   Harbor Town Design District.
                             (2)   Pole signs shall not be permitted in the 0-HTD Overlay Harbor
                                   Town District.

                             (3)   Signs attached to buildings extending above the roof peak shall
                                   not be permitted in the O-HTD, Overlay Harbor Town District.
                             (4)   A Certificate of Design Compliance shall be required for aU signs
                                   in the O-HTD Overlay Harbor Town Design District pursuant to
                                   subsections 115-85.2D and E of this chapter.


                   Section 3. Section 115-96 of the Municipal Code, relating to non-conformities, as
               amended, is hereby further amended by amending subsection F(3)(f)[11 to read in its
               entirety as follows:
                        (11 Any non conforming sign not terminated pursuant to any other
                             provision of this chapter except for:
                             [a]   Advertising signs in C-2, C-3, C-4 and M-1 and M-2 Districts,
                                   unless such districts are within an established Preservation
                                   District or the Overlay Harbor Town Design District;
                             [b]   Pole signs and signs attached to buildings extendin above the
                                   roof peak located within the Overlay Harbor Town Sesign
                                   District and legally existing on the effective date of the ordinance
                                   establishing the 0-HTD District.
                   Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.



               Passed by the following vote:
               Ayes -   President Curran, Councilmembers Childress Brown, Giess, King, Mains,
                        Muldoon, Norwood, Padilla, Stevenson - 9.

               Nays - None - 0.
















                                  Attest
                                                    60                                  City Clerk






                              City of Rochester
                              City Clerks Office
                              Certified Ordinance

                              Rochester, N.Y.,

                              TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
        I hereby certify that the following is a true copy oi an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council of
        the City of Rochester on SePte"ber 12 19 Lo and App=med             by the
                                              (not disapproved. approved. repassed attar disapproval)
        Mayor of the City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on SePtember 13 19 LO in accordance
        with the applicable provisions of law.         Ordinance No. 90-366


                           Amending Chapter 115 Of The Municipal
                           Code, Zoning Ordinance, And Chapter 48,
                           Environmental Review To Require A
                           Certificate Of Design Compliance In
                           Overlay Design Districts


                BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:
                Section 1. There is hereby added to the Municipal Code the following new
            Section 115-24.1 to read in its entirety as follows:
                    Section 115-24.1 Certificate of Design Compliance.
                    A.   Authority.
                         The Director of Zoning shall, subject to the rocedures, standards and
                         limitations hereinafter set forth, review anT approve, approve with
                         conditions, or deny applications for Certificates of Design Compliance.
                    B.   Purpose.
                         The Certificate of Design Compliance process recognizes that some
                         desips even though generally suitable for location in a design district,
                         are, because of their character, buildin materials, details, textures or
                         other features of probable impact, capalle of adversely affecting the
                         goals for which a design district is established unless careful
                         .consideration has been given to critical design elements. The
                         Certificate of Design Compliance provides a vehicle for review of the
                         developer's attention to such design elements. It is intended that the
                         Certificate of Design Compliance shall be utilized only in conjunction
                         with an Overlay Design District.



                                             61









                        C.    Certificate of Design Compliance required.
                              A Certificate of Design Compliance shall be required only in Overlay
                              Design Districts, as established in this chapter, for the following
                              activities:

                              (1)  Construction of new buildings or structures;
                              (2)  Exterior alterations to buildings, including alterations to signs,
                                   which are substantially visible from public ogen space, Lake
                                   Ontario, the Genesee River or any public rig t-of-way;

                              (3)  Exterior alterations to existing buildings and structures on any
                                   lot which abuts the Genesee River;

                              (4)  Alterations to structures that change structure volume;
                              (5)  Alterations to buildings which change the shape or height of a
                                   roof line;

                              (6)  Development or redevelopment of a parking lot;
                              (7)  Exterior alterations to existing buildings and structures on any
                                   lot which is imm diately adjacent to any landmark or landmark
                                   site;

                              (8)  Exterior work involved in repairing fire damage when such
                                   damage exceeds fift ercent (50%) of the replacement cost new
                                   of the unit dama rey 97orwIlever, a Certificate of Design
                                   Compliance shalfbe'required when such damage is less    "than
                                   fift percent (50%) of the replacement cost new and the
                                   replacement is not in kind.
                              (9) Street and other improvements in the public right-of-way.

                        D.    Procedure.

                              (1)  Application. Applications for certificates of design compliance
                                   shall be submitted to the Director of Zoning. A nonrefundable
                                   fee, as established from time to time by the City Council to help
                                   defray admini ative costs, shall accompany each application.
                                   Applications shall besubmitted in two (2) duplicate cores and
                                   shall be in such form and contain such information an
                                   documentation as shall be prescribed from time to time by the
                                   Director of Zoning, but shall in all instances contain at least the
                                   following information or documentation unless any such
                                   information or document is expressly waived by the Director of
                                   Zoning as not relevant or necessary to determine that all
                                   provisions of this chapter have been met in a particular case:





                                                          62









                               (a)  The applicant's name, address and interest in the subject
                                    property-
                               (b)  The owner's name and address, if different than the applicant,
                                    and the owner's signed consent to the filing of this application.
                               (c)  The name, residence and the nature and extent of the interest,
                                    as defined by Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New
                                    York, of any state officer or any officer or employee of the City of
                                    Rochester or the County of Monroe in the owner-applicant or the
                                    subject property if known to the applicant.
                               (d)  The address or location of the subject property.
                               (e)  The present use and zoning classification of the subject property.
                               (f)  The proposed use or uses of the subject property and a
                                    description of the construction, reconstruction, remodeling,
                                    alteration or moving requiring the issuance of a certificate of
                                    design compliance.

                               (g)  The certificate of a registered architect or licensed professional
                                    engineer, or of an owner-designer, that the proposed
                                    construction, reconstruction, remodeling, alteration or moving
                                    complies with all the provisions of this chapter.
                               (h)  If site plan approval is not required in conjunction with the
                                    application for a certificate of design compliance, a site plan
                                    drawn to scale of not less than fifty (50) feet to the inch, on one
                                    (1) or more sheets, illustrating the proposed construction,
                                    reconstruction, remodeling, alteration or moving and including
                                    the following:
                                    [11   Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property
                                          and any significant topographic or physical features of the
                                          property.
                                    [21   The location, size, use and arrangement, including height
                                          in stories and feet; where relevant, floor area ratio, total
                                          floor area and coverage; and number and size of dwelling
                                          units, by number of bedrooms, of proposed buildings and
                                          existing buildings.
                                    [31   Minilm"M yard dimensions and, where relevant, relation of
                                          yard dimensions to the height of any building or structure.








                                                              63










                                    (41   Location, dimensions, number and slope and gradient of all
                                          driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading
                                          spaces and access aisles; total lot coverage of all parking,
                                          loading, driveway and aisle areas; and, where more than
                                          ten (10) parking and loading spaces are required, location of
                                          area for snow storage or indication of alternative disposal
                                          method.

                                    [51   Location, size, arrangement and sketch showing content
                                          and layout of all outdoor signs.
                                    (61   Location and height of fences or screen plantings, and the
                                          type or kind of building materials or plantings to be used
                                          for fencing or screening.

                                    [71   Location, designation and total area of all usable open
                                          space.

                                    [81   Any information necessary to determine that conditions
                                          imposed by any special approval granted pursuant to this
                                          chapter have been complied with.
                              M     Scaled floor plans.

                              0)    Scaled elevations.

                              (k)   Such other and further information and documentation as the
                                    Director of Zonm'g may deem necessary or appropriate to a full
                                    and proper consideration and disposition of the particular
                                    application. The Director ma     aive any of the application
                                                                t L7 i v@
                                    submission requirements of     s su  section if in his or her
                                    opinion such     andproper consideration and disposition can be
                                    rendered without such information.

                         2.   Action on the application.

                              (a) Action by Director.

                                    [11   Within twenty-one (21) days following receipt by the
                                          Director of a completed application, or such longer time as
                                          may be alleed to by the applicant, the Director shall cause
                                          such application and the attached plans to be reviewed for
                                          compliance with this section and shall inform the applicant
                                          whether the application has been granted, granted with
                                          conditions or denied. The failure of the Director to act
                                          within said twenty-one (21) days, or such longer time as
                                          may be agreed to by the applicant, shall be deemed to be a
                                          denial








                                                                64









                                      [21   In any case where an application is granted, the Director of
                                            Zoning shall issue a Certificate of Design Compliance which
                                            shall state on its face, in bold type that:

                                            "TIRS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT SIGNIFY BUILDING
                                            CODE REVIEW OR APPROVAL NOR SUBDIVISION
                                            REVIEW OR APPROVAL NOR REVIEW OR APPROVAL
                                            OF ANY OTHER CITY CODE AND IS NOT
                                            AUTHORIZATION TO UNDERTAKE ANY WORK
                                            WITHOUT SUCH REVIEW AND APPROVAL WHERE
                                            THE SAME IS REQUIRED. SEE CHAPTERS 39 AND 128
                                            OF THE ROCHESTER MUNICIPAL CODE FOR
                                            DETAILS.

                                            "BEFORE ANY STRUCTURE TO WHICH THIS
                                            CERTIFICATE IS APPLICABLE MAY BE OCCUPIED OR
                                            USED FOR ANY PURPOSE, A CERTIFICATE OF
                                            OCCUPANCY MUST BE OBTAINED. SEE SECTION
                                            115-25 OF CHAPTER 115 and CHAPTER 39 OF THE
                                            ROCHESTER MUNICIPAL CODE FOR DETAILS."

                                      (31   In any case where an application is denied, the Director of
                                            Zoning shall state the specific reasons and shall cite the
                                            Specific provisions of this chapter upon which such denial is
                                            based.
                                      [41   Disgosition of copies: the Director of Zoning shall stamp
                                            eac (copy of the application and plans to reflect the action
                                            taken and shall return one (1) copy of each to the applicant
                                            and shall retain one (1) copy of each in City records for such
                                            period as he or she may deem necessary or as may be
                                            required by law.
                               (b)    Action by Preservation Board.
                                      If the Director shall decline to approve the application, or
                                      approve it subject to modification which is not acceptable to the
                                      applicant, or if any person is aggrieved by the action of the
                                      Director, such action shall not be deemed final administrative
                                      action or an action or failure to act pursuant to Section 115-33 of
                                      this chapter, but shall only be authorization for the applicant or
                                      the person aggrieved to refer the application to the Preservation
                                      Board for review and decision. Such referral shall be made by
                                      filing a written request with the Director within thirty (30) days
                                      of the action, specifying the grounds therefor. The Director shall
                                      promptly refer such request to the Preservation Board which
                                      shall review and act upon the application within twenty-one (21)
                                      days of receipt in the same manner and subject to the same
                                      standards and limitations as those made applicable to the
                                      Director by Subsection 5(a) above. The decision of the
                                      Preservation Board shall be final.





                                                                  65










                        E.   Standards for denial of a Certificate of Design Compliance.
                             Applications for Certificates of Design Compliance shall not be
                             disapproved pursuant to this section except on the basis that the
                             proposal is not in keeping with the purpose, goals and objectives of a
                             garticular design district as set forth in this chapter. Such denial shall
                              e based on specific written findings directed to one (1) or more of the
                             following standards:
                             (1)    The application is incomplete in specified particulars or contains
                                    or reveals violations of this chapter or other applicable
                                    regulations which the applicant has, after written request, failed
                                    or refused to supply or correct;
                             (2)    The design unnecessarily, and in specified particulars, destroys,
                                    damages, detrimentally modifies or interferes with the
                                    enjoyment of significant natural, topographic or physical
                                    features of the site or the significant design features of the
                                    existing buildings and structures on the site;
                             (3)    The design unnecessarily, and in specified particulars, obstructs
                                    views of or from significant structures or natural features;
                             (4)    The design unnecessarily, and in specified particulars, is lacking
                                    amenity in relation to, or is incompatible with nearby structures
                                    of significance on or off the property;
                             (5)    The roof pitch, fenestration, scale, massing, form, size, texture,
                                    color and materials employed by the design are, unnecessarily
                                    and in specified particulars, lacking in amenity in relation to or
                                    incompatible with nearby structures of significance on or off the
                                    property;
                             (6)    The site design features are deficient in terms of the creation and
                                    preservation of open space; the retention of trees and shrubs to
                                    the extent possible; pedestrian access, automobile access and
                                    parking;
                             (7)    The design of commercial building facades and appurtenances
                                    fails to form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to ensure
                                    visual compatibility with the buildings, sublic ways and places to
                                    which such elements are visually relate ;
                             (8)    Exterior building appurtenances, such as porches and decks, are
                                    lacking in visual compatibility with the buildings to which they
                                    are attached or other buildings in the area or with the character
                                    encouraged in the design district in so far as materials, texture,
                                    colors and design.

                        F. Effect of Issuance of Certificate of Design Compliance.




                                                                66







                          The issuance of a Certificate of Design Compliance shall not authorize
                          the establishment or extension of any use nor the development,
                          construction, relocation, alteration or moving of any building or
                          structure and shall not abrogate the requirements for any additional
                          permits and approvals which may be required by the codes and
                          ordinances of the city, including but not limited to a building permit, a
                          certificate or occupancy and subdivision approval.
                      G.. Limitation on Certificates.
                          A Certificate of Design Compliance shall become null and void six (6)
                          months after the date on which it was issued unless within such period,
                          a permit is issued, where necessary, and construction, reconstruction,
                          remodeling, alteration or moving of a structure is commenced.
                  Section 2. Section 115-17 of the Municipal Code, Preservation Board, as
              amended is hereby further amended by amending subsection K thereof by
              renumberinf subsections K(7) and (8) as subsections K(8) and (9), and by inserting
                      L
              therein the ollowing new subsection K(7):
                      (7) Subject to theyrovisions of subsection 115-24.lD2(b) of this chapter, to
                          hear and decide on applications for Certificates of Design Compliance.
                  Section 3. Section 115-18 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Director of
              Zoning, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending subsection A thereof by
              renumberiug subsections AM through (17) as subsections A(10) through (18)
              respectively, and by inserting therein the following new subsection A(9):
                      (9) Certificate of Design Compliance. Subject to the procedures, standards
                          and limitations set forth in Section 115-24.1 of this chapter, the
                          Director shall review or cause to be reviewed, applications for
                          Certificates of Design Compliance and shall. approve, approve with
                          conditions, or deny such applications.
                  Section 4. Section 48-5 of the Municipal Code, relating to Type II actions, as
              amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto the following new subsection
              B(22):

                      (22) The granting of Certificates of Design Compliance.
                  Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.
              Passed by the following vote:
              Ayes - President Curran, Councilmembers Childress Brown, Giess, King, Mains,
                      Muldoon, Norwood, Padilla, Stevenson -- 9.

              Nays - None - 0.








                               Attest
                                                      67                     City Clerk







                                                     DESIGN GUIDELINES
                                            HARBOR TO99 DESIGN U377M (0-HT0)


                   The Harbor Town Design District has been designated in order to create a unique
                   village neighborhood atmosphere in the Lake Avenue corridor north of the Lake
                   Ontario State Parkway and along Stutson Street and Latta Road; a unique maritime
                   atmosphere along River Street north of Petten Street an both sides of the Genesee
                   River and to protect significant physical , historic, topographic and natural
                   features in the area. These basic guidelines for development in the area are
                   intended for use in connection with the sections of the Zoning Ordinance which deal
                   with the Harbor Town Design District (O-HTD).

                    I. ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT:
                       Arcnitecturai developim-eMs should be guided by an intent to protect the
                       existing character in these neighborhoods through the appropriate use of scale,
                       color, materials, and detailing for buildings facing the street corridors.
                       Architectural developments should be harmonious with subarea development
                       themes, goals, and objectives, so as to further create and reinforce an overall
                       identity for the development area.

                       The commercial buildings are the areas of greatest concern for facade
                       renovation. Strategies for restoration include the removal of materials which
                       obscure the architectural integrity of building facades, the repair or
                       replacement of deteriorated design details, and the addition of new
                       architectural details in appropriate materials, as necessary, for the
                       adaptation of older buildings to contemporary uses.

                       A. Building Setbacks:
                          New construction should complement existing conditions.     In both residential
                          and commercial areas the predominant existing setbacks on built up streets
                          should be maintained. In commercial areas, new infill and additions to
                          existing buildings should parallel the street, reinforce the street edge at
                          corner lots and provide continuity along the street corridor.

                       B. Fenestration:
                          The proportion of window and door openings to total exterior facade is
                          crucial to the perception of bulk and scale for individual buildings. The
                          River Harbor district can utilize the sizing and placement of facade
                          openings as a unifying treatment for the street wall. Development and
                          redevelopment in the area should be guided toward a cohesive image.

                          The relationship of window and doorway openings to exterior walls in
                          historic buildings should be preserved or restored wherever necessary.
                          Where new windows or doorways are introduced, they should respect the
                          existing facade pattern.

                          Openings on street-facing walls should not be greater than 50%, nor less
                          than 30% of the total area of the facade.    Glass curtain walls or spandrel
                          glass are inappropriate, as are blank walls without windows.

                          Display windows are appropriate on the first story in commercial buildings,
                          but only two-way glass should be used in windows. Mirrored or tinted glass
                          generally is unacceptable.




                                                             68







                               Window openings for exterior walls, other than the street facade, should
                               nat be greater than 30% of the total area of the wall nor less than 15% of
                               the wall area.

                           C.  Color and Materials:
                               The predominant ouflding material for commercial structures in the area is
                               brick in yellow or brown tones. Historically, wood siding has been used
                               on both commercial and residential buildings.  New buildings should take
                               their "spirit" from historic buildings, so that they are compatible with
                               the color and materials used in nearby significant buildings.

                               The use of imitation stone, grooved plywood, galvanized steel, sheet
                               aluminum, sheet plastic, and vinyl siding materials on commercial
                               buildings is strongly discouraged . Acceptable materials include wood,
                               brick, stone or cast iron. Detailing and trim elements, including doors,
                               should conform to these standards.

                               Accent colors applied to wood trim, brick, or metal detailing are
                               acceptable. Fluorescent colors are not appropriate and, in general, not
                               in keeping with purposes for which the district was established. Original
                               cast stone, stone or concrete trim should not be painted.

                           0.  Restoration:
                               All resiora-fions should follow the latest revision of the Secretary of the
                               Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for rehabilitating
                               historic buildings.

                               Original facade openings should be retained Or restored to original
                               condition. Ground level windows and entrances should be given priority.
                               Appropriate measures include the removal of uncceptable materials,
                               uncovering transom windows, restoration of doorways, down-scaling signage,
                               and replacement of lost or damaged details. The addition of new elements,
                               such as lighting. awnings, ornament, hardware or signage is permitted
                               where such additions do not detract from the historic character of the
                               building.

                           E.  Scale and Bulk:
                               Maximum builMng heights are delineated in the Zoning Ordinance; however,
                               in the areas closest to the river or in other areas, where views to and
                               from the river are possible, buildings of a height wtich obstructs these
                               views are unacceptable. Views of historic or architecturally significant
                               structures should also be carefully considered.

                               Existing rooflines range from complex gabled and dormered residential
                               rooflines to steeply sloped church roofs, to flat roofs with orthogonal
                               rooflines. Due to the variety of roof forms in the area, specific
                               development proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

                       II.  SITE DEVELOPMENT
                            Site develo-5-m-eRns should ensure the proper functioning of circulation
                            systems, the safety of visitors, and a unified and consistent image for
                            streetscape elements. Edge definitions for pedestrian, planting and parking
                            zones should be clarified to enhance the overall pedestrian experience.







                                                                69









                         A . Private Plantino:
                             V_Privately-own;d and maintained planting zone may exist between the
                             property line and the building, depending on the building setback.       In
                             residential areas, the setback may be planted with any types of flowering
                             plants, trees, shrubs, ground covers or lawn.    Grass lawn is preferable in
                             residential areas. Where setback of commercial buildings from the public
                             right-of-way is permitted or required, this area should be developed in a
                             manner compatible with the public sidewalk and planting area along the
                             frontage.  Flowers, trees and shrubs are permitted.     Trees should meet
                             planting requirements for public plantings, including tree grates.
                             Planter boxes and pots are acceptable in these private planting areas.

                         B.  Parking Lots and Areas:
                             Z-17-e efforts na7e -Been made to encourage pedestrian traffic in the
                             development area, it is  intended that it become a destination for many
                             visitors. Therefore, adequate plans for parking lots and areas must be
                             considered.


                             1.  Access and Circulation Elements:
                                 Access to off-street parking by way of secondary streets is
                                 encouraged. For off-street lots with direct access to Lake Avenue,
                                 definition of one exit and one entrance is encouraged. Interior
                                 landscaping with both shrubs and canopy trees is encouraged and should
                                 be considered. The plantings should meet all of the requirements for
                                 public plantings. Aisles and planting strips should be defined with
                                 curbing. Pedestrian walkways should be clearly defined and conflicts
                                 between pedestrian and vehicular traffic,should be minimized.

                             2.  screening:
                                 X11 off-street surface parking adjacent to the street must be screened
                                 from the view of pedestrians. Screen walls 3 to 4 ft. in height are
                                 encouraged.   Such walls should be set back 5 ft. with the area between*
                                 the wall and sidewalk planted with trees and other landscape
                                 elements. Tree plantings should conform to the standaHs for public
                                 plantings. The tree planting area may be covered in hard paving with
                                 tree grates or planted with trees, shrubs and ground covers.
                                 Evergreen vines are allowable for screen walls.

                   III.  SIGNAGE

                         Because of the strong impact of signage on the streetscape, protection must be
                         afforded from inappropriate signage.    Signs should harinonize with the building
                         they serve and promote the use they serve imaginatively and effectively
                         While not dominating the surrounding visual enviroment.      Signs should ;e of a
                         scale in keeping with the use and building they serve and the immediate
                         neighborhood, as well.

                         A.  Sign Materials:
                             1. Appropriate sign materials include brass, cast iron, steel and carved
                                and painted wood. Other materials will be reviewed on a case-by-case
                                basis.

                             2. In general interior lit and plastic signs are considered incompatible
                                with the goals and purposes for which the district was established.

                             3. Neon signs on the interior of windows are acceptable; if permanent,
                                they are treated as wall signs in Section 115-68 of the Zoning
                                Ordinance.

                             4. The sign support structure should be durable but should be designed and
                                colored to reduce its dominance or obtrusiveness.

                                                               70








                         B. Relationship To The Buildino:
                             T-.--S-j-jns shouid be integrat9d closely with the architectural features of
                                 the building. The form, design materials, texture and color of the
                                 sign should maintain or complement the style, design and form of the
                                 building.

                             2.  Signs and their support structures should not cover up or damage
                                 decorative features of the facade such as leaded glass transoms, cast
                                 iron or wooden pilasters, etc.

                             3.  Where several businesses are located in/on one property, the signs
                                 should be coordinated, complement or balance one another and not
                                 compete with each other.

                         C.  Relationship To The Area:
                             7.  size or tne signs shoUld be in keeping with the scale of nearby
                                 structures as well as the building they serve.

                             2.  Existing or planned landscaping, on the site and nearby should be
                                 considered in locating the sign.

                             3.  Visual clutter in signage should be avoided by refraining from the use
                                 of large signs, random placement of signs and excessive numbers of
                                 signs.

                             4.  Signage should relate to-pedestrian and low level vehicular traffic.


                     IV.  STREET CORRIDOR

                          Street corridors should be developed to assist in reinforcing the overall
                          c@aracter of the area by defining the relationship of buildings to public
                          spaces and circulation systems. The street corridor developments should
                          promote continuous street wall development where appropriate, protect street
                          corridors from encroachment by buildings, and provide for on-street parking
                          and service requirements. The standards presented in this category deal with
                          the corridors bounded by lot lines on each side of the street.

                          A. Parkinq:
                             U-n-77eet parking should be metered parallel parking, except in
                             residential areas, where demand does not require metering. Parallel
                             parking with a narrowed planting zone can be considered.for high demand
                             areas.

                          B. Landscaping:
                                  tne area streets, a planting zone should be established for street
                             trees measuring a minimum of 3 feet from the face of the curb in areas
                             with on-street parking and 10 feet from the curb in areas without
                             on-street parking.   The purpose of the planting zone is the separation of
                             pedestrian and vehicular corridors. The planting zone should be grass in
                             residential areas and "hard scape" paving in commercial areas. The width
                             of the planting strip should be variable to accommodate the needs of
                             parking conditions, i.e., the planting zone may narrow for parallel
                             parking, but should conform to the minimum width.



                                                                 71







                            in conjunction with shoreline redevelopment an the east side of River
                            Street, a pia.nting zone shoul 4d be established in areas south of the
                            Stutson Street Bridge where the shore zone is too narrow to allow for
                            front end parking. This planting zone should be hardscape paving, with
                            tree grates provided as specified below.

                            All planting zones should include trees unless otherwise specified.
                            Street trees shall be chosen from species with the following
                            cha rac teri s ti c s:

                                   Hardiness (plant zone 3)
                                   Tolerance to street conditions, including salt
                                   A maximum mature height of 40 to 60 feet
                                   A low maintenance schedule
                                   An open, airy growth habit that affords light shade in summer
                                   Seasonal interest

                         B. Landscaping:
                            Trees that drop substances harmful to the finish of parked automobiles
                            should be avoided. Other undesirable characteristics for street trees
                            include multi-stemmed or suckering trees, species with a low or compact
                            habit of growth, those which produce an abundance of fleshy fruits, and
                            species prone to disease or insect predation.

                            Examples of suitable choices include:
                                   Oaks (Red or White)
                                   Honeylocust
                                   Littleleaf Linden
                                   London Plane Tree

                            Poor choices are exemplified by:
                                   Norway Maple
                                   Pin Oak
                                   Conifers
                                   Crabapple

                            At the time of planting, young trees should be 3-1/2" caliper, with the
                            lower side of the crown a minimum of 6' above grade to avoid hazards to
                            pedestrians. Trees should be placed every 30 feet in the planting strip.

                            In commercial areas where the planting strip is hard pavement, trees
                            should be provided with grates. Trees requiring grates are planted with
                            the top of the root ball 5" below the pavement surface to allow for grate
                            installation.

                            All new trees should be staked and guy-wired for a period of one year
                            after planting.

                         C. Pavin
                            ;Mkewalk paving should be concrete scored in 6 foot squares, with tree
                            pits at 30' on center. The use of asphalt sidewalks is unacceptable.
                            Concrete walks should be dominant where driveways cross pedestrian paths.

                            Scoring or imprinting concrete, in coordination with subarea themes, is
                            allowable. Specific emblems or insignia symbolizing the unique character
                            of a subarea may be deve,loped to enhance visitors' awareness of local
                            history.

                                                                  72







                              A concrete sidewalk should be established approximately 5 feet from the
                              River Street Right-of-Way on the west side of the street. The planting
                              zone should be 8 feet wide from the edge of the sidewalk to the street
                              curb. A new concrete retaining wall should be installed from the Stutson
                              Street Bridge abutment north about 280 feet to accommodate the grade
                              change along River Street. A new sidewalk 6 feet wide should be
                              constructed along the west side of the retaining wall from the bridge
                              abutment to the lower level of River Street. The street corridor widths
                              for improvements to this section of River Street are summarized below:
                                     West Sidewalk                61
                                     Planting Zone                81
                                     Curbing           .51
                                     Parallel Parking             81
                                     Travel Lane                  10,
                                     Curbing           .51
                                     East Sidewalk                61
                                     Retaining Wall               2'

                              Where pedestrian corridors cross streets, curbs should be zeroed out and
                              the crosswalk should be highlighted to increase pedestrian safety. A 10
                              foot brick stri_p should be provided on each side of the 'crosswalk.
                              Curbing material set flush to the street should form the joint between
                              asphalt paving and the brick strips. Crosswalks should correspond
                              directly to the 6 foot sidewalk pavement widths, with brick strips
                              corresponding to planting zone widths. On River Street, cobblestones are
                              recommended in place of the brick.

                          C.  Lighting and Furniture:
                              Lonsistent wiUr-Me -turn of the century time theme, antique sytle posts
                              and lantern lighting should replace cobra lights on Lake Avenue, Stutson
                              Street, Latta Road, and all minor cross streets In the redevelopment
                              area. The materials for lighting fixtures should be cast iron or
                              aluminum, such as those manufactured by Antique Street Lamps, Inc. or an
                              equivalent quality.

                              The total height of post and luminaire should not exceed 15 feet.
                              Finished colors for lightposts should be black or dark olive.

                              At the waterfront, and along River Street, the lighting should be pole
                              lighting with an industrial character, such as the railroad fixture
                              manufactured by Sternberg.

                              Street furnishings should be expressive of the turn-of-the-century time
                              theme. Street furnishings include trash receptacles, drinking fountains,
                              benches, bollards, and tree grates. These items should be located in
                              planting zones such that pedestrian corridors remain unobstructed. Street
                              furnishings must be compatible in design, color, and materials with light
                              fixtures.

                              Benches should be of an historic style and could incorporate custom
                              lettering or a logo for River Harbor or the design district. They should
                              be provided at bus stops and as necessary at locations where pedestrians
                              congregate. Trash receptacles should be placed near each bench.





                                                                  73









                           Bollards should be used at all pedestrian crossings.  A bollard and chain
                           barrier should be placed between pedestrian accessways and the
                           Consolidated Rail tracks on River Street, where the sidewalks parallel the
                           railroad.  Pipe railings should be installed with concrete retaining walls
                           on River Street between Latta Road and Stutson Street, and at the
                           Lighthouse Park.  Similar pipe railings should be incorporated into the
                           design specifications for a concrete bulwark along the west shore of the
                           Genesee River. Bollards, chains, and pipe railings should be painted
                           black.
























































                                                             74





                                           City of Rochester
                                           City Clerks Office
                                           Certified Ordinance

                                           Rochester, N.Y.,

                                           TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
           I hereby certify that the following is a true copy oi an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council of
           the City of Rochester on - SePteuber 1119 90 and          Approved                               by the
                                                                  (not disapproved. approved, repassed after disapprovai)
           Mayor of -the City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on SePtember 131.19 LO in accordance
           with the applicable provisions of law.                             Ordinance No. 90-370


                                       Amending The Municipal Code By Adding
                                       A New Chapter Relating To Waterfront
                                       Consistency Re        , as amended


                       BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:
                       Section 1. The Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 112 -
                  Waterfront Consistency Review, which shall read in its entirety as follows:

                                                         CHAPTER 112

                                 WATERFRONT CONSISTENCY REVIEW ORDINANCE

                             Section 112-1. Purpose.
                             The purpose of this cha ter is to protect the public health, safety and
                             general welfare in the My of Rochester, by providing a framework for
                                     mental agencies to review actions proposed within the boundaries of
                                 city's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). This
                             framework will allow agencies to consider the policies and purposes
                             contained in the city's LVtrRP when reviewing applications for actions or
                             when directly approving, undertaking or fiinding agency actions located in
                             the waterfront area. The framework will also ensure that such actions are
                             consistent, to the maximum extent practicable, with said policies and
                             purposes.
                             It is the intention of the City of Rochester that the preservation,
                             enhancement and utilization of the natural and man-made resources of the
                                   unique coa
                             city's             stal areas take place in a coordinated and comprehensive
                             manner, in order to ensure a proper -balance between natural resource
                             protection and the need to accommodate population growth and economic
                             development. Accordingly, this ordinance is




                                                             75









         intended to achieve such a balance, by permitting the beneficial use of coastal
         resources while preventing: loss of living estuarine resources and wildlife;
         diminution of open space areas or public access to the waterfront; erosion of
         shoreline; impairment of scenic beauty; losses due to flooding, erosion and
         sedimentation; or permanent adverse changes to ecological systems.
                 Section 112-2. Authority.
                 This ordinance is enacted under the authority of Section 20 of the General
                 Citj Law and the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act of
                 the State of New York (Article 42 of the Executive Law).

                 Section 112-3. Definitions.

                 When used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings
                 ascribed to them:

                 ACTION - shall have the same meaning as in Section 48-3 of the Municipal
                 Code Environmental Review, but shall le limited to those activities that
                 constitute an unlisted or Type I action, as defined in Section 48-3.
                 AGENCY - any governmental agency, including but not limited to the City
                 Council, departments, offices, commissions, boards, agencies, officers or
                 other bodies of the City of Rochester.

                 COASTAL AREA - the New York State coastal waters and adjacent
                 shorelands as defined in Article 42 of the Executive Law. The s ecific
                 boundaries of the city's Coastal Area are shown on the Coastal rea Map on
                 file in the office of the New York State Secretary of State and as delineated
                 in the City of Rochester's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (TASK
                 D.

                 COASTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (CAF) - the form, contained in Appendix
                 A, which shall be used by an agency to assist it in determining the
                 consistency of an action with the city's LWRP.

                 CONSISTENT TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE - that an
                 action will not substantially hinder the a6hievement of any of the LWRF
                 policy standards or conditions and, whenever practicable, will advance one
                 or more of them.

                 DIRECT ACITONS - an action planned and proposed for implementation by
                 an agency itself, such as, but not limited to a capital project, or rule making,
                 procedure making or policy making decisions or determinations.
                 LOCAL WATERFRONT AREA (LWA) - that portion of the New York State
                 Coastal Area within the City of Rochester as delineated in the city's LW`RP
                 (TASK I).








                                        76









                          LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM (LWRP) - the
                          Local Waterfront Revitalization Program of the City of Rochester, as
                          V
                          a proved by the New York State Secretary of State, pursuant to the
                             aterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act (Executive Law,
                          Article 42), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City of
                          Rochester.

                          Section 112-4. Review of Actions.

                          A.    Whenever a proposed action is located in the LWA, an agency shall,
                                prior to approving, funding or undertaking the action, make a
                                determination that it is consistent, to the maximum extent
                                practicable, with the applicable LV%TRP policy standards and conditions
                                set forth in Section 112-5 herein.
                          B.    Whenever an agency receives an application for approval or funding of
                                an action or as early as possible in the agency's undertaking of a direct
                                action to be located in the LWA, the applicant, or in the case of a direct
                                action, the agency, shall prepare a Coastal Assessment Form (CAF) to
                                assist with the consistency review.
                          C.    Prior to making its determination, the agency shall solicit and
                                consider the recommendation of the Commissioner of the City of
                                Rochester Department of Community Development or his/her
                                desi         garding the consistency of the pro
                                    ignee, rej                                  posed action, by
                                referring a copy of the completed CAF to the Commissioner within ten
                                (10) days of its submission to or completion by the agency.
                          D.    After referral from an agency, the Commi sioner shall consider
                                whether the proposed action is consistent, to the maximum extent
                                practicable, with the LVVFRP policy standards and conditions sat forth
                                in Section 112-5 herein. The Commissioner may require the applicant
                                to submit all completed applications, EAF's and any other information
                                or documentation deemed to be necessary in order to make the
                                consistency determination.

                          E.    The Commissioner shall render his/her written recommendation to the
                                agency within ten (10) working days following the submission by the
                                                      .  d information, unless extended by mutual
                                applicant of the require
                                agreement of the Cornmi sioner and the applicant, or in the case of a
                                direct action, the agency. The recommendation shall indicate
                                whether, in the opinion of the Commissioner, the proposed action is
                                consistent, to the maximum extent practicable, or inconsistent with
                                one or more of the applicable LWRP policy standards or conditions.
                                The recommendation shall state the manner and extent to which any
                                inconsistency affects the LWRP policy standards and conditions.








                                                           77








                           The Commi sioner shall, along with his/her consistency
                           determination, make any suggestions to the agency concerning
                           modification of the proposed action in order to make it consistent, to
                           the maximum extent practicable, with LWRP policy standards and
                           conditions, or to greater advance them.

                           In the event that the Commissioner's recommendation is not
                           forthcoming within the specified time, the application shall be deemed
                           to have received a recommendation that it is consistent to the
                                    - extent practicable.

                      F.   The agency shall make the determination of consistency based on the
                           CAF, the recommendation of the Commi sioner and such other
                           information as is deemed to be necessary in its determination. The
                           agency shall issue its determination within seven (7) days of receipt of
                           the Commissioner's recommendation.

                      G.   Actions to be undertaken within the LWA shall be evaluated for
                           consistency in accordance with the following LWRP policy standards
                           and conditions, which are derived from and further explained and
                           described in TASK III of the City of Rochester's LWRP. The LW`RP is
                           on file in the City Clerk's office and is available for inspection during
                           normal business hours. Agencies which undertake direct actions shall
                           also consult with TASK IV: USES AND PROJECTS of the LViRP in
                           making their consistency determination. The action shall be
                           consistent with the policy to:
                                (1)   Revitalize and redevelop deteriorating or underutilized
                                      institutional, commercial, recreational and residential
                                      areas and uses (POLICY 1, 1A. 1B. 1C, 1D. 1E. 1F, 1G

                                (2)   Encourage the development of water-dependent uses near
                                      coastal waters (POLICY 2,=;

                                (3)   Ensure that development occurs where adequate public
                                      infrastructure is available to reduce health and pollution
                                      hazards (POLICY 5,5&!5B. 5Q ;
                                (4)   Streamline development permit procedures (POLICY 6);
                                (5)   Protect significant and locally important fish and wildlife
                                      habitats from human disruption and chemical
                                      contamination (POLICIES 7- 7A. 7B. 7C and 8);

                                (6)   Maintain and expand commercial fishing facilities to
                                      promote commercial and recreational Fi-sling opportunities
                                      (POLICY 9.9A, 9B);

                                (7)   Minimize flooding and erosion hazards through
                                      nonstructural means, carefully-selected, long-term
                                      structural measures and appropriate siting of structures
                                      (POLICIES 11, 11A_ 11B_ 12, MA, 13,13-A, 14, 15 and 17,,




                                                   78








                                      (8)   Safeguard economic, social and environmental interests in
                                            the coastal area when major actions are undertaken
                                            (POLICY 18);
                                      (9)   Maintain and improve public access to the shoreline and to
                                            water-related recreational facilities w       rot ding the
                                            environment (POLICIES 19,19A- I                19D. 20,20A.
                                            20B. 20C. 20D. 20E ;

                                      (10)  Encourage and facilitate water-dependent and
                                            water-enhanced recreational resources and facilities near
                                            coastal waters (POLICY 21. 21A. 21B. 21C ;

                                      (11)  Encourage the development of water-related recreational
                                            resources and facilities, as multiple-uses, in appropriate
                                            locations within the shorezone (POLICY 22, 22A. -22B ;

                                      (12)  Protect and restore historic and archeological resources
                                            (POLICY 23, 23A. 23B. 23C);

                                      (13)  Protect and upgrade scenic resources (POLICY 25, 25A.
                                            25B. 25C ;

                                      (14)  Protect surface and groundwaters from direct and indirect
                                            discharge of pollutants and from overuse (POLICIES 30,
                                            31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37 and 38);

                                      (15)  Perform dredging and dredge spoil disposal 'in a manner
                                            Protective of natural resources (POLICY 35);

                                      (16)  Handle and dispose of hazardous wastes and effluents in a
                                            manner which will not not adversely affect the environment
                                            nor expand existing landfills (POLICY 39); and,

                                      (17)  Protect tidal and freshwater wetlands (POLICY 44).

                          H. If the agency determines that the action would cause a substantial
                                hindrance to the achievement of the LVaW licy standards and
                                conditions, such action shall not be undertaCnL] unless the agency
                                determines with respect to the proposed action that:
                                      (1)   No reasonable alternatives exist which would permit the
                                            action to be undertaken in a manner which would not
                                            substantially hinder the achievement of such LWRP Policy
                                            standards and conditions, or which would not hinder the
                                            overall implementation of the LV4RP;









                                                          79








                                    (2)  The proposed action and any required mitigation measures
                                         would be undertaken in a manner which would - - - e
                                         all adverse effects on natural and man-made resources           is
                                         within the LWRP, and would minirni e the extent to which
                                         the implementation of LVVW policy standards and
                                         conditions are hindered; and,

                                    (3)  The action will result in a significant and overriding city,
                                         regional or state-wide public benefit.
                                    Such a finding by the agency shall constitute a determination
                                    that the action is consistent to the maximilm extent practicable.
                         I.   Each agency shall maintain a file for each action which was the
                              subject of a consistency determination, including any
                              recommendations received from the Commissioner. Such files shall be
                              made available for public inspection upon request.
                         Section 112-6. Coordinated Review Required.
                         The agency and the Commissioner of Community Development or designee
                         shall coordinate the consistency determination -process required by this
                         chapter with the environmental review process required by Chapter 48 of
                         the Municipal Code.
                         Section 112-7. Severability.
                         The rovisions of this ordinance are severable. If any provision is found
                         invz.,d, such finding shall not affect the validity of any Part or provision
                         hereof other than the provision so found to be invalid.
                   Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.


               Passed by the following vote:
               Ayes -    President Curran, Councilmembers Childress Brown, Giess, IQng, Mains,
                         Muldoon, Norwood, Padilla, Stevenson - 9.
               Nays - None - 0.






               Underlined material added.










                                    Attest
                                                     80                                    City Clerk








                                                          APPENDIX  A


                                                          COASTAL  ASSESSMENT F0RM




                        A.    INSTRUCTIONS   (Please print or type all answers)

                              1 .  Applicants, or in the case of direct actions (city, town, village) agencies,
                        shall complete this CAF for proposed actions which are subject to the consistency review
                        law.  This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a (city, town,
                        village) agency in asking a determination of consistency.

                              2.   Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form  should
                        review the policies and explanations of policy contained in the Local Waterfront
                        Revitalization Program (LWRP), a copy of which is on file in the (city, town, village)
                        clerk's office. A proposed action should be evaluated as to its significant beneficial
                        and adverse effects upon the coastal  area.

                              3.   If any question in Section C on this form is answered  "yes", then the proposed
                        actin may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in
                        the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if
                        necessarty, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum
                        extent practicable with  the  LWRP policy  standards and conditions. If an action cannot be
                        certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be
                        undertaken.



                        B.    DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION 
                              1.   Type of (city, town, village) agency action (check appropriate response):

                                   (a)  Directly undertaken (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency
                                        regulation, land  transaction)

                                   (b)  Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)

                                   (c)  Permit, approval, license, certification

                                   (d)  Agency undertaking action:

                              2.   Describe nature and extent of action:





                              3.   Location of action

                                                     Street or Site  Description 

                              4.   Size of site

                              5.   Present land use

                              6.   Present zoning classification

                              7.   Describe any unique or unusual land forms on the project site (i.e. bluffs,
                                   dunes, swales, ground depressions, other geological formations):



                              8.   Percentage of site which contains slopes of 15% or greater:

                              9.   Streams, lakes, ponds or wetlands existing within or contiguous  to the
                                   project area:

                                   (1) Name
                                   (2) Size (in acres)

                              10.  If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the (c1ty, town,
                                   village) agency, the following information shall be provided:

                                   (a) Name of applicant:
                                   (b) Mailing address: 
                                   (c) Telephone number:           Area code (    )
                                   (d) Application number, if any:




                                                                       81






                              Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state
                            or federal agency?
                        Yes ___    No ___ If yes, which state or federal agency?


                  C.    COASTAL ASSESSMENT  (Check either "Yes" or "No" for each of the following
                                               questions)
                        1.    Will the proposed action be located in, or contiguous to,                   YES  NO
                              or have a potentially adverse effect upon any of the resource
                              areas identified on the coastal area map:    .............................

                              (a) Significant fish or wildlife habitats?     ...........................
                              (b) Scenic resources of local or statewide significance?      .............
                              (c) Important agricultural lands?    ....................................
                              (d) Natural protactive features in an erosion hazard area?    ...........
                              If the answer to any question above is yes, please explain in 
                              Section D any measures which will be undertaken to mitigate any
                              adverse effects.

                        2.    Wi11 the proposed action have a significant effect upon:                    YES   N0

                              (a)  Commercial or recreational  use of fish and wildlife resources?...-
                              (b)  Scenic quality of the coastal environment?    .......................
                              (c)  Development of future, or existing water dependent uses?     .........
                              (d)  Operation of the State's major ports?    ............................
                              (e)  Land at water uses within a small harbor area?     ...................
                              (f)  Stability of the shoreline?   ......................................
                              (g)  Surface or groundwater quality?..'  ................................
                              (h)  Existing or potential public recreation opportunities?    ...........
                              (i)  Structures, sites or districts of historic, archeological or
                                   cultural significance to the (city, town, village), State or 
                                   nation?  ..........................................................

                        3. Will   the proposed action Involve or result in any of the following:          YES  NO

                              (a)  Physical  alteration of land along the shoreline, land under
                                   water or coastal waters?   .........................................
                              (b)  Physical alteration of two (2) acres or more of land located
                                   elsewhere in the coastal area?  ...................................
                              (c)  Expansion of existing public services or Infrastructure In
                                   undeveloped of low density areas of the coastal area?      ............
                              (d)  Energy facility not subject to Article VII or VII of the
                                   Public Service Law?  ..............................................
                              (e)  Mining, excavation, filling or dredging in coastal waters?        .......
                              (f)  Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along
                                   the shore?  .......................................................
                              (g)  Sale or change In use of publicly-owned Lands located on the
                                   shoreline or under water?   ........................................
                              (h)  Development within a designated flood or  erosion hazard area?
                              (i)  Development on a beach, dune, barrier island or other natural
                                   feature that provides protection against flooding or erosion? 
                              (j)  Construction or reconstruction of erosion protective
                                   structures?  .......................................................
                              (k)  Diminished surface or groundwater quality?    .......................
                              (1)  Removal of ground cover from the site?    ........................... 

                        4.    Project                                                                     YES   NO

                              (a)  If project is to be located adjacent to shore:
                                   (1)  Will water-related recreation be provided?     ..................
                                   (2)  Will public access to the foreshore  be provided?    ............
                                   (3)  Does the project require a waterfront site?     .................
                                   (4)  Will it supplant a recreational or maritime use?    ............
                                   (5)  Do essential public services and facilities presently 
                                        exist at or near the site?    ...................................     
                                   (6)  Is it located in a flood prone area?    ........................
                                   (7)  Is it located in an area of high erosion?     ..........




                                                                     82






                                 (b)   If the Project site is publicly owned:                               YES             NO
                                       (1) Will the project protect, maintain and /or increase the 
                                            level and types of public access to water-related
                                            recreation resources and facilities?   ........................
                                       (2)  If located in the foreshore,will access to those and
                                            adjacent land& be provided?  .................................
                                       (3)  Will it involve the siting and construction of  major
                                            energy facilities?  ..........................................
                                       (4)  Will it involve the discharge of effluents from  major
                                            steam electric generating and industrial facilities
                                            into  coastal facilities?    ....................................
                                 (c)   Is the  project site presently used by the community 
                                       neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?    ................
                                 (d)   Does the present  site offer or include scenic views  or vistas
                                       known to be important to the community?    .........................
                                 (e)   Is the project  site presently used for commercial fishing  or
                                       fish processing?  .................................................
                                 (f)   Will the surface area of any waterways or wetland  areas be
                                       increased or decreased by the proposal?   ..........................
                                 (g)   Does any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other  locally
                                       important vegetation  exist on this site which will be removed
                                       by the project?  ..................................................
                                 (h)   Will the project involve any waste discharges into coastal
                                       waters?  ..........................................................
                                 (i)   Does the  project involve  surface or subsurface liquid waste
                                       disposal?  ........................................................
                                 (j)   Does the project Involve transport, storage, treatment or 
                                       disposal of solid waste  or hazardous materials?    ..................
                                 (k)   Does the project involve shipment or storage of petroleum 
                                       products?  ........................................................
                                 (l)   Does the  project Involve discharge of toxics, hazardous
                                       substances or other pollutants into coastal waters?    ..............
                                 (m)   Does the project involve or change existing ice  management
                                       practices?  .......................................................
                                 (n)   Will the project affect any area designated as a tidal or
                                       freshwater wetland?  ..............................................
                                 (o)   Will the project altar drainage flow, patterns or surface 
                                       water runoff on or from the site?   ................................
                                 (p)   Will base management practices be utilized to control storm
                                       water runoff into coastal waters?   ................................
                                 (q)   Will the project utilize or affect the quality or quantity
                                       of sole source or surface water supplies?   ........................
                                 (r)   Will the project cause emissions which exceed federal or
                                       state air quality standards or generate significant amounts
                                       of nitrates or sulfates?  .........................................


                       D.   REMARKS OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.  (Add any additional  sheets necessary to complete 
                            this form.)



















                            If assistance or further information is needed to complete this form, please contact 
                       (city, town, village) clerk at

                       Preparer's Name:                                Telephone Number: (     )                   

                       Title:                                          Agency:                                Data:



                                                                      83






                                  City of Rochester
                                  City Clerks Office
                                  Certified Ordinance

                                  Rochester, N.Y.,

                                  TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
       I hereby certify that the following is a true copy of an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council of
       the City of Rochester on Septmber 11, 19 ZO and       Approved                      by the
                                                      (not disapproved, approved. repassed after disapprovai)
       Mayor ofthe City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on Septenber 13,,19%0- in accordance
       with the applicable provisions of law.                     Ordinance No. 90-371

                                Amending Chapter 48 Of The Municipal
                                Code, Environmental Review, With Respect
                                To the Local Waterfront Revitalization
                                Provam And Waterfront Consistency
                                Review

                  BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:
                  Section 1. Section 48-7 of the Municipal Code, Environmental Review process, as
              amended, is hereby further amended by amending subsection AU) thereof to read in
              its entirety as follows:
                        (1)  Determine whether the action is sub*e t to this chapter, and whether
                             it is located within the boundaries 5thce City of Rochester's Local
                             Waterfront Revitalization Program (L7*FRP) area (see TASK I of the
                             LV*rRP). If the action is an exempt, an excluded or a Type II action,
                             the agency shall have no further responsibility under this chapter or
                             Chapter 112, Waterfront Consistency Review Ordinance, except
                             recordkeeping responsibilities. If the action is an unlisted or a Type I
                             action, the requirements of this chapter shall apply. If such an
                             unlisted or Type I action is located within the boundaries of the City's
                             LWRP, the consistency review procedures and requirements of
                             Chapter 112 shall also apply and be coordinated with the
                             environmental review required by this chapter.

                  Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.

              Passed by the following vote:
              Ayes -    President Curran, Councilmembers Childress Brown, Giess, King, Mains,
                        Muldoon, Norwood, Padilla, Stevenson - 9.

              Nays - None - 0.






                                  Attest
                                                    84                                 Citv Clark







                                                    City of Rochester
                                                    City Clerks Office
                                                    Certified Ordinance

                                                    Rochester, N.Y.,

                                                    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

                  I hereby certify that the following is a true copy of an ordinance which was duly passed by the Council of

                  the City of Rochester on September 11,    19 91 and            Approved                            by  the
                                                                           (not disapproved, approved, repassed after disapproval)
                  Mayor of the City of Rochester, and was deemed duly adopted on September 13, 1991 in accordance

                  with the applicable provisions of law.


                                                                                 Ordinance No. 91-416


                                        Amending Chapter 39 Of The Municipal
                                        Code, Building Code, With Respect To Site
                                        Preparation, as amended


                        BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the City of Rochester as follows:

                        Section 1. Article IV of Chapter 39 of the Municipal Code, Building Code,
                  relating to Conflicts and severability and containing Section 39-401 and 39-402, is
                  hereby renumbered as Article V, with Section 39-401 and 39-402 renumbered as
                  39-501 and 39-502, respectively, and there is hereby added to Chapter 39 of the
                  Municipal Code the following new Article IV:

                                                            ARTICLE IV

                        Section 39-400.       Purpose.
                                              It is the purpose of these regulations to protect health, safety,
                                              and welfare in the City of Rochester by regulating site
                                              preparation activities, including filling, grading, and stripping,
                                              so. as to prevent nuisances from being created, including
                                              erosion, sedimentation or drainage.

                        Section 39-401.       Title.

                                              These regulations shall be known and may be cited as the
                                              "Regulations for the Issuance of Site Preparation Permits in
                                              the City of Rochester".

                        Section 39-402.       Jurisdiction.

                                              All site preparation, and associated activities requiring a Site
                                              Preparation Permit, shall be in conformance with the
                                              provisions set forth herein.



                                                                    85
 








                  Section 39-403.    Authority.
                                     The Director of the Bureau of Buildings shall serve as the
                                     agent of the Commissioner for the purpose of administering
                                     these regulations.

                  Section 39-404.    Definitions.

                                     As used in this Article, in addition to the terms defined in
                                     Section 39-201, the following terms shall have the meanings
                                     indicated:

                                     CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE - A si ed
                                     statement by the Commi si ner that specific construction Tas
                                     been inspected and found to comply with all grading plans and
                                     specifications.

                                     CITY ENGINEER - The City Engineer of the City or an
                                     authorized representative.

                                     DIRECTOR - The Director of the Bureau of Buildings of the
                                     City or an authorized representative.

                                     DRAINAGE - The gravitational movement of water or other
                                     liquids by surface runoff or subsurface flow.
                                     EROSION - The process by which the ground surface is worn
                                     away by action of wind, water, gravity, or a combination
                                     thereof.

                                     EXCAVATION OR CUT - Any act by which soil or rock is cut
                                     into, dug, quarried, uncovered, removed, displaced, or
                                     relocated, and also included shall be the conditions resulting
                                     therefrouL

                                     FELLING - Any activi which deposits natural or artificial
                                     material so as to mo -a the surface or subsurface conditions of
                                     land, lakes, ponds or watercourses.
                                     GRADING - Any stripping,            ti   fillin tockpiling, or
                                                                  'c'v' Mded '12 be the land in
                                     any combination thereof, and also inc
                                     its excavated or filled condition.

                                     MULCHING - The application of a layer of plant residue or
                                     other material for the purpose of effectively controlling erosion.

                                     PERMANENT SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE -
                                     Those control measures which are installed or constructed to
                                     control soil erosion and which are maintained after completion
                                     of the project.
                                     RATIONAL METHOD - A method of estimating the runoff in a
                                     drainage basin at a specific point and time by mean of the
                                     rational runoff formula.




                                                         86








                                        @EDIMENT - Solid material, both mineral and organic, that is
                                        in suspension, is being transported, has been deposited, or has
                                        been removed from its site of origin by erosion.
                                        SITE PREPARATION - Site preparation shall include, but is
                                        not limited to: filling, stripping of vegetation, grading, altering
                                        existing topography for any purposes whatsoever.
                                        SOIL - All unconsolidated mineral or nonliving organic
                                        material of whatever origin which overlies bedrock.
                                        STRIPPING - Any activity which removes or significantly
                                        disturbs the vegetative surface cover including clearing and
                                        grubbing operations.

                                        TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES -
                                        Interim control measures which are installed or constructed
                                        for the control of soil erosion until permanent soil erosion
                                        control is effected.

                                        TOPSOIL - The natural surface layer of soil, usually darker
                                        than subsurface layers, to a depth of at least six (6) inches
                                        within an undisturbed area of soils.

                                        WATERCOURSE - Any natural or artificial stream, river,
                                        creek, ditch, channel, canal, conduit, culvert, drainage way,
                                        gully,.ravine, or wash in which water flows in a definite
                                        direction or course, either continuously or intermittently, and
                                        which has a definite channel, bed, and banks, and any area
                                        adjacent thereto subject to inundation by reason of overflow,
                                        flood, or storm water.
                                        WETLANDS - Areas of aquatic or semi-aquatic vegetation, or
                                        any areas which have been mapped as such by the New York
                                        State Department of Environmental Conservation under the
                                        New York State Freshwater Wetlands Act or the United States
                                        Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service for the
                                        National Wetlands Inventory.
                     Section 39-405.    Permit Requirement.
                                        AL   None of the following activities shall be commenced until a
                                             permit has been issued pursuant to the provisions of these
                                             regulations or a building Rermit or site Rlgu ap9my
                                             including site prejR atio-n- activitigs has been granted:

                                             (1)  Site preparation within wetlands;
                                             (2)  Site preparation on slopes which exceed one and one
                                                  half (1-1/2) feet of vertical rise for each ten (10) feet of
                                                  horizontal distance, as determined by a topographical
                                                  survey;

                                             (3)  Site preparation within the floodplain of any
                                                  watercourse;


                                                              87









                                        (4) Excavation which affects more than fifty (50) cubic
                                            yards of material within any parcel or any contiguous
                                            area;
                                        (5) Stripping which affects more than ten thousand
                                            (10,000) square feet of ground surface within any
                                            parcel or any contiguous area;
                                        (6) Grading which affects more than ten thousand
                                            (10,000) square feet of ground surface within any
                                            parcel or any contiguous area; or
                                        (7) Filling which exceeds a total of fifty (50) cubic yards of
                                            material within any parcel or contiguous area.
                 Section 39-406. Permit Application, Review, Issuance and Compliance
                                    Procedures.

                                    A-  Prior to the commencement of any work requiring a
                                        permit under Section 39-405, six (6) copies of a permit
                                        application shall be filed with the Commissioner, and the
                                        application shall have been approved and a permit issued
                                        pursuant to the provisions of these regulations.
                                    B.  At the time of filing an application for a site reparation
                                        termit, a fee of seven hundred fifty dollars (@750.00) shall
                                         e made payable to the City Treasurer.
                                    C.  The Director shall have the authority to recommend to the
                                        Commissioner that a permit application be approved or
                                        denied. The Director shall also have the authority to
                                        recommend the approval of a permit subject to conditions.
                                    D.  Copies of the permit a li t* shall be submitted to the
                                                                    '@o
                                                                    T
                                        City Engineer, who shM Zb :t recommendations on the
                                        application to the Director within fifteen (15) business
                                        days of the date of filing. Failure by the City Engineer to
                                        comment within the fifteen (15) business day review
                                        period shall not restrict the Director from carrying out his
                                        or her responsibilities related thereto.
                                    E.  The Director shall make a recommendation to grant or
                                        deny all permits within sixty (60) days after the date of
                                        filing of a complete application, unless the applicant and
                                        the Director consent to a time extension.

                                    F.  [Prior to malting a recommendation to grant a permit, the
                                        Director shall:

                                        (1) Seek the concurrence of the Director of Zoning;
                                                                                                     .10


                                                       88









                                           (2)  Seek the concurrence of the Director of Planning;

                                           (3)  Seek the concurrence of the Director of Development
                                                Services;
                                           (4)  Seek the concurrence of the City Engineer;
                                           (5)  Seek the concurrence of the Director of Neighborhood
                                                Development; and

                                           (6)  Seek the concurrence of the Rochester Pure Waters
                                                District if said District has jurisdiction.

                                       G.] The Director shall recommend a reasonable time limit for
                                           the termination of the permit and may recommend any
                                           conditions which are deemed necessary to assure
                                           compliance with the provisions of these regulations. In no
                                           event shall the overall total time schedule for completion
                                           of the project exceed twelve (12) months.

                                       (HI-Q.   The Director shall cause inspections to be performed
                                                as required to assure compliancewith the terms and
                                                conditions of the approvedge=its, and to submit
                                                written notification to the         sioner of any
                                                violations of these terms or provisions.

                                       MH.      If at any time during the effective period of a permit,
                                                the terms of the permit are violated, the
                                                Commissioner may revoke the permit, in accordance
                                                with the rocedures set forth in subsection 39-210H of
                                                the City 8ode.
                   Section 39-407.     Permit Application Materials.
                                       A.  The a plication for a permit regulated by these procedures
                                           shall ger made to the Director, as agent for the
                                           Commi si n , in such form as the Commissioner and
                                           Director shall prescribe.
                                       B.  The application shall be made by the owner or by an
                                           authorized agent including, but not limited to, an
                                           architect, engineer, occupant of the property, or contractor
                                           employed in connection with the propose& work.

                                       C.  The application shall contain:
                                           (1) A site plan prepared by a civil engineer, landscape
                                                architect, or land surveyor licensed and registered to
                                                g
                                                 ractice in the State of New York. The site plan shall
                                                 e prepared at a scale no smaller than one (1) inch to
                                                twenty (20) feet (1"-20') and shall indicate: existing
                                                and proposed contours at horizontal intervals not to




                                                            89








                                             exceed ten (10) feet; the locations of all buildings and
                                             natural features including, but not limited to streams,
                                             water bodies and wetlands, structures or
                                             appurtenances; and the locations and descriptions of
                                             any utilities, easements and rights-of-way.
                                         (2) The site plan shall indicate all areas of vegetation,
                                             including areas of grass, brush, tree clusters and wood
                                             areas, caliper size of mature trees, and shall also
                                             indicate the areas where topsoil is removed and
                                             stockpiled and where topsoil is ultimately placed.
                                         (3) A description of the material used in filling
                                             operations, the total volume of material proposed to be
                                             deposited on site, and a listing of the points of origin
                                             of the proposed fill material which include:
                                             (a)   Name, address, and telephone numbers of the
                                                   owner of the source material;
                                             (b)   Street address, town, village, city, county and
                                                   tax account number of location of point of origin
                                                   for source material; and
                                             W     A notarized affidavit signed by the owner of the
                                                   source material which states that the material
                                                   has been tested and found free of any hazardous
                                                   waste and complies with the requirements set
                                                   forth in subsection 39-408A(7). A copy of the test
                                                   results, performed by an authorized testing
                                                   agency, shall be included as part of the affidavit.


                                         (4) Proposed contours which shall. be shown at a
                                                        interval of two (2) feet.

                                         (5) A time schedule which indicates:
                                             (a)   The anticipated commencement and completion
                                                   dates; and
                                             M     The anticipated duration (in days) of the
                                                   ex osure of all major areas of site preparation
                                                   before the installation of erosion anasediment
                                                   control measures.

                                         (6) A performance bond or letter of credit in increments of
                                             ten thousand dollars ($10,000.) for each five thousand
                                             (5,000) cubic yards or fractions of thereof, of material
                                             scheduled for placement on site. The bond shall not
                                             be released until it has been determined b the
                                             Director that the work has been completeYin
                                             conformance with these regulations.





                                                        90







                     Section 39-408.      Standards for Application Approval.
                                         A. In grantm*g a permit under these regulations, the
                                              standards anj considerations taken into account shall
                                              include, but are not limited, to the following:
                                              (1)  Excavation, filling, grading, and strippinf shall be
                                                   permitted to be undertaken only in such ocations and
                                                   in such manner as to minimize the potential for
                                                   erosion and sedimentation and the threat to the
                                                   health, safety, and welfare of neighboring property
                                                   owners and the general public.
                                              (2)  Site preparation and construction shall be fitted to the
                                                   vegetation'  to 0 aphy, and other natural features of
                                                   the site and s?aYpreserve as many of these features
                                                   as feasible.

                                              (3)  The control of erosion and sedimentation, includin
                                                   dust control, shall be a continuous process unde=en
                                                   as necessary prior to, during, and after site
                                                   preparation and construction.
                                              (4)  Mulching or temporary vegetation suitable to the site
                                                   shall be used where necessary to protect areas
                                                   exposed by site preparation, and permanent
                                                   vegetation which is well @da ted to the site shall be
                                                   installed as soon as practiff
                                              (5)  Where slopes are to be revegetated in areas exposed
                                                   by site preparation, the slopes shall not be of such
                                                   steepness that vegetation cannot be readily
                                                   established or that problems of erosion or
                                                   sedimentation may result.
                                              (6)  Site preparation and construction shall not adversely
                                                   affect the free flow of water or bring about flood
                                                   conditions by encroaching on, blocking, or restricting
                                                   watercourses, or drainage patterns.
                                              (7)  All fill materials shall be of a composition suitable for
                                                   the ultimate use of the fill, free of hazardous
                                                   materials, contaminants, rubbish, organic or frozen
                                                   material. It shall be free of any materials which may
                                                   corrode, collapse, dissolve or cause voids, or present
                                                   the potential for causing voids. Structural steel, steel
                                                   reinforcing, conduit, pxpm*g or similar materials are
                                                   not permitted to comprise the fill material.
                                                   Demolition or construction debris of any type is
                                                   prohibited.







                                                               91








                                          (8)  Fill material shall be compacted sufficiently to
                                               prevent problems of erosion[, andI [w&here the
                                               material is to support structures or roadways, it shall
                                               be compacted to within ninety-five percent (95%) of
                                               modified Proctor density with oper moisture
                                               control. Compaction tests ShZbe submitted to the
                                               Commissioner by an independent soils testing
                                               laboratory which verify the compaction results.
                                          (9)  All topsoil which is excavated from a site shall be
                                               stockpiled and used for the restoration of the site, and
                                               such stockpiles, where necessary, shall be seeded or
                                               otherwise treated to minimi e the effects of erosion.
                                               All fill shall be covered to a minimum de?th of thirty
                                                                                         ,e
                                               (30) inches with clean earth free of boul ers or rocks
                                               exceeding twelve (12) inches in diameter, and shall
                                               also be covered with topsoil to a minimum depth of six
                                               (6) inches. The final proposed grade elevations shall
                                               be taken from the finished top soil elevation.

                                          (10) Prior to, during, and after site preparation, an
                                               integrated drainage system shall be provided which at
                                               all times minimi es erosion, sedimentation, hazards of
                                               slope instability, and adverse effects on neighboring
                                               property owners.
                                          (11) The natural drainage system shall generally be
                                               preserved in preference to modifications of this system
                                               excepting where such modifications are necessary to
                                               reduce levels of erosion and sediment and adverse
                                               effects on neighboring property owners.
                                          (12) All drainage systems shall be designed to adequately
                                               handle estimated flows both within the site and from
                                               the entire upstream drainage basin, with the flow
                                               estimations to be calculated utilizing the Rational
                                               Method for a specified storm event.
                                          (13) Sufficient grades and drainage facilities shall be
                                               provided to prevent the ponding of water.
                                          (14) Drainage systems, plantings, and other erosion or
                                               sediment control devices shall be maintained as
                                               fi-equently as necessary to provide adequate
                                               protection against erosion and sediment and to insure
                                               that the fi-ee flow of water is not obstructed by the
                                               accumulation of silt, debris, or other material or by
                                               structural damage, so as to avoid the creation of flood
                                               conditions.










                                                          92








                                          (15) Cuts and fills shall not endanger adjoining property,
                                              nor divert water onto the property of others.
                                          (16) In the event that the removal of any trees, shrubs,
                                              vegetation and/or other organic material is necessary
                                              to conduct operations covered by this permit, all such
                                              material shall be removed off-site to an approved
                                              location prior to the commencement of iffor grading
                                              activities.

                   Section 39-409.    Denial of Permit.

                                      A. Site Preparation Permits shall not be issued where:

                                          (1) A nuisance will be established as defined by Section
                                              59-23 of the Municipal Code;
                                          (2) The proposed work would cause hazards to the public
                                              safety, comfort, health, repose or welfare;
                                          (3) The work as proposed by the applicant win damage
                                              any public or private property or interfere with any
                                              existing drainage course in such a manner as to cause
                                              damage to any adjacent property or result in the
                                              depositing of debris or sediment on any public way or
                                              into any waterway or create an unreasonable hazard
                                              to persons or property;
                                          (4) The land area for which grading is proposed is subject
                                              to geological hazard to the extent that no reasonable
                                              amount of corrective work can eliminate or
                                              sufficiently reduce settlement, erosion, slope
                                              instability, or any other such. hazard to persons or
                                              property; or
                                          (5) The land areas for which the grading is proposed may
                                              he within the     d lain of any stream or watercourse
                                              unless a hydro ogic report, pr pared by a professional
                                              engineer, is su mitted to certz that the proposed
                                              grading will have, 'in his opu*u* on, no detrimental
                                              influence on the public welfare or upon the total
                                              development of the watershed.
                   Section 39-410.    Responsibility of Owner.
                                      A. During grading and filling operations the owner shall be
                                          responsible for:
                                          (1) The prevention of damage to any public utilities or
                                              services within the limits of grading and along any
                                              routes of travel of the equipment that are not part of
                                              the public right-of-way;
                                                            floo
                                                             I
                                                             b




















                                                         93








                                        (2) The prevention of damage to adjacent property. No
                                            person shall grade on land so close to the property line
                                            as to endanger any adjoining public street, sidewalk,
                                            alley, or any pubhc or private groperty without
                                            supporting and protecting sue property from setding,
                                            cracking, or other damage which might result;
                                        (3) Carrying out the proposed work in accordance with
                                            the approved plans and in compliance with all the
                                            requirements of the permit and Chapter 39; and
                                        (4) The prompt removal of all soil, miscellaneous debris,
                                            or other materials apphed, dumped, or otherwise
                                            deposited on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or
                                            other public ffioroughfares during transit to and from
                                            the construction site, where such spillage constitutes
                                            a public nuisance or hazard.
                 Section 39-411.    Minimum Design Standards for Erosion and Sediment Control.
                                    All grading plans and specifications including extensions or
                                    previously approved plans shall include provisions for erosion
                                    and sediment control in accordance with, but not hmited to,
                                    accepted engineering standards and the Eridelines as outlined
                                    in the document entitled, Gui hnes for     osion jud_agdimcnt
                                    Control in Urban Areas of New York State available from the
                                    Monroe County Soil and Water Conservation District.
                 Section 39-412.    Inspection.
                                    The requirements of these regulations shall be enforced by the
                                    Director. The Director shall cause the work to be inspected to
                                    assure compliance with the requirements of these regulations.
                 Section 39-413.    Project Closeout.
                                    A. A Certificate of Substantial Compliance shall be issued by
                                        the Director when all of the following have been submitted
                                        to the Director or verified as specified elsewhere in these
                                        regulations, including:

                                        (1) Written verification from a New York State ficensed
                                            professi'onal land surveyor, civil engineer, or
                                            Landscape architect that the final grading and
                                            contours conform with the requirements of the
                                            approved site plan;
                                        (2) Required tests verifying soil compaction have been
                                            prepared by an independent soils testing lab and
                                            copies of the results have been submitted; and







                                                       94








                                                 (3)  Submission of the results of core samples taken from
                                                      the site, which verifies that the material deposited on
                                                      site complies with subsection 39-408A(7). Core
                                                      s         shall be performed by an approved
                                                      indepenaent testing laboratory and shall be taken at
                                                      intervals not to exceed one (1) sample for each five
                                                      thousand (5,000) square feet of site area affected b
                                                      any filling, grading or stripping operation covered
                                                      these regulations. The exact locations of the samp as
                                                      shall be determined by the Director.

                          Section 39-413.    Applicability of Article H.
                                             Except where specific provisions relating to site preparation
                                             are established in this Article, the Administrative Regulations
                                             of Article II of this chapter shall apply to site preparation and
                                             permits, performance of work and enforcement.
                          Section 2. Section 39-211 of the Municipal Code, Stop-Work orders, as amended,
                     is hereby further amended b ddin the words "or performed under any permit
                                                  tK a     g
                     after the words 'Whenever e Commissioner has reasonable. grounds to believe that
                     work on any building or structure" where they appear at the beginning of the first
                     sentence of said section.

                          Section 3. Section 59-43 of the Municipal Code, Dumping, as amended, is hereby
                     further amended by deleting the words "Chief of Police" in each place where they
                     appear therein, and by inserting in their place the words "Director of Buildings".

                          Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect two weeks after the date of its
                     adoption.



                     Bracketed material deleted; underlined material added.



                     Passed by the following vote:
                     Ayes - President Curran, C                   ers Childress Brown, Giess, IQng, M
                                Muldoon, Norwood, Stevenson - 8.

                     Nays - None - 0.










                                                                         17
                                              Attest
                                                                  95                                    City Cler







                                                                                              4











                                                                                           0






















                       US Department of Commerce
                  NOAA Ccaastal Services Center Library
                        2234 South Zobson Avenue
                        Charleston, SC 29405-2413











                                                                                                                                                 NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CTA LIBRARY
                                                                                                                                                         11    1                 ij,
                                                                                                                                                          38 14111515 6