[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
71-1 ou dad INorth Fcadh tcrfrort IRcAltalization Plan. COAST AL ZION-R INFOIRMATION C.L,2';Tr-,R HT 177 October 1983 .N67 1983 c.2 The Phipps Group The Waterfront Center J-M. Hutto Associates Alan Sparber & Associates NORTH BEACH WATERFRONT REVITALIZTION PLAN Town of North Beach, Maryland October 1983 Prepared by: The Phiipps Group The Waterfront Center J.M. Hutto Associates Alan Sparber & Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS FAqe Ng. Table of Contents ii List of Figures v List of Tables vii Preface viii Executive Summary ix: I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Purpose of this Waterfront Revitalization Plan 2 B. Background 2 C. Existing Conditions 7 1. Population and Demographics 7 2. Economic Conditions 9 3. Land Use and Zoning 10 D. The Steering Committee Process 14 II. REVITALIZATION GOALS 17 III. THE BEACH AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 20 A. Introduction 21 B. The Shoreline of the North Beach Waterfront 21 C. Ge6morphic History of the Vicinity 22 D. Historical Changes in the Shoreline in North Beach 23 E. Littoral Processes Along the North Beach Shoreline 25 F. Coastal Morphology of the North Beach Shoreline 26 G. Beach Nourishment Alternatives 32 H. Recreational Boating Alternatives 32 I. Protection From High Wave Energy 34 J. Dredging Requirements 34 K. Recommendations and Conclusions 35 1. The Beach 35 2. Waterfront Structures 35 3. Marina Development 36 IV. WATERFRONT RECREMION 38 A. Introduction 39 B. Ideas From Other Areas 40 C. Analysis of Existing Recreation Opportunities 40 D. Waterfront Recreation Concepts and Recommendations 41 1. Public Pier and Restaurant 41 2. Waterfront Park 43 3. Baywalk 4. Public Bathhouse 45 5. Boat Launch 47 V. COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION 49 A. Introduction 50 B. Changed Nature of Retailing 51 C. Cars and North Beach 51 D. Revitalization in North Beach 52 E. Need for Private Investment 53 F. Commercial Revitalization Recommendations 53 1. IGA Site 54 2. Public Pier and Restaurant 57 3. Calvert Hotel Site 60 4. Hotel/Inn Site 63 5. Bowling Alley and Motel Site 65 G. Financing Incentives 69 1. Rehabilitation 69 2. New Construction 70 VI. TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING 71 A. Introduction 72 B. Existing Transportation Access 72 C. Transportation Recommendations 73 D. Parking Situation 74 E. Parking Recommendations 74 VII. DESIGN AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 75 A. Introduction 76 B. Design Standards 77 C. Public Improvements 79 1. Streetscape 79 2. Sidewalks 80 3'. Gazebo 81 D. Recommendations 83 VIII. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 84 A. Introduction 85 B. Staging and Cost of Public Improvements 86 C. Staging and Cost of Private Investment 86 APPENDICES A. EMATION OR SAND FILL VOLUMES FOR BEACH NOURISHMENT PROGECT A-1 B. ESTIMATE OF DREDGING VOLUME AND COST B-1 C. EVALUATION OF WATERFRONT STRUCTURES C-1 D. LIST OF BUSINESSES IN NORTH BEACH D-1 E. RELEVANT NEWSPAPER STORIES E-1 F. 19201S PROMOTIONAL BROCHURE FOR NORTH BEACH F-1 iv LIST OF FIGURES Pacie No. 1. North Beach Beachfront 3 2. North Beach Commmity 4 3. Regional Location 6 4. Land Use 12 5. Property Ownership 13 6. Zoning 15 7. Historical Shoreline 24 8. Location Map of Shore Profiles 27 9. Shore Profile - Location 1 28 10. Shore Profile - locations 2 & 3 29 11. Shore Profile - Locations 4 & 5 30 12. Shore Profile - Locations 6 & 7 31 13. Location Map 33 14. North Beach Pier 42 15. Waterfront Park 44 16. Baywalk 46 17. Marina/Boat Launch Site 47 18. IGA Site 55 v 19. Public Pier and Restaurant 58 20. Calvert Hotel 61 21. Hotel/Inn Site 64 22. Bowling Alley and Motel Site 66 23. Recomendations Summary Map 68 24. Calvert Hotel Architectural Features 78 25. Baywalk Location 80 26. Io0ation of Needed Sidewalk Improvements 81 27. Public Improvements 82 Vi LIST OF TABLES FAge No. 1. North Beach, Population, 1930-1980 8 2. North Beach, Population Distribution by Age Group, 1970-1980 8 3. North Beach, Occupied Housing Units by Tenure and by Year Household Moved into Unit,.1980 11 4. Cost of Implementation, Public Investment, October 1983 87 5. Cost of Implementation, Private Investment, October 1983 90 Vii Preface Success in a revitalization program depends to a great extent upon a shared vision for the future. The recamendations in this Plan are due to the work and dedication of many individuals and groups. In particular, we wish to acknowledge the major contributions of that small ban of seven wtio ca%posed the Revitalization Steering Committee which produced a balanced and sensitive series of recommendations. In addition, we wish to thank that large group of North Beach citizens who faithfully attended the public sessionsy wrote letters, and submitted their suggestions which form such a key caTonent of this Plan. Our special thanks are extended to those curators of North Beach's history, Bernie Loveless, Vic Scuderif and Dale Thomas who so generously gave of their memories and their pictures of the past. No progress would be possible without the support and cooperation of the local agency representatives. We wish particularly to thank Vivian Marsh of the Calvert County Department of Planning and Trisha Bednarz of the State Department of Natural Resources for their assistance. Finally, we thank the elected officials of the Town of North Beach. Without the political vision and courage of the Mayor and Town Council, this Plan would not be possible. The Phipps Group has been responsible for the overall direction and management of the Waterfront Revitalization Plan. J. M. Hutto Associates prepared the analysis and recommendations on the beach and the natural enviroment, while the Waterfront Center was responsible for the %eterfront recreational aspects of the study. Alan Sparber & Associates, Architects have been able to translate general development goals into graphic blueprints for the future. The Phipps Group The Waterfront Center J. M. Hutto Associates Alan Sparber & Associates, AIA viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTTVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Waterfront Revitalization Plan is to provide the basis for future public and private improve- ments in the waterfront and commercial area of North Beach. The revitalization goals and the plan recommendations were developed with strong business and community involvement and support. Iie REVITALIZATION GOALS The revitalization goals approved by the steering committee and community in a public meeting form the basis for development of this Waterfront Revitalization Plan. The general goal is to "promote controlled and attractive change to improve the waterfront and commercial areas of North Beach, so that it serves the needs of the Thwn.as well as the broader community by generating revenue, while remaining sensitive to the unique character of the Town." Other approved goals deal with public improvements, issues of development, issues of rehabilitation and issues of design. III. THE BEACH AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT This chapter establishes a basis for waterfront revital- ization and includes development of realistic on-shore and off-shore recommendations that are sensitive to the natural environment. The recommendations can be summrized as follows: 0 The sand beach should be rebuilt through the addition of appropriately sized sand material to provide erosion abatement and waterfront recreation possibilities. An engin- x eering and cost effectiveness analysis should be done to determine the location and the depth of the rebuilt beach. 0 Repair and maintain such groins, jetties, bulkheads and other structures that are necessary to properly retain the sand beach. 0 In the short term, re-open the existing marina at the north end of Town and develop a smallboat ramp. Encourage recreational rental activity such as wind-surfing and catamarans. Develop off-shore structures that will protect the marina and boat ramp. Identify suitable sites for disposal of dredge spoil. In the long-term, evaluate the feasibility of substantial marina construction in this area. 0 Remove stormwater outfalls from the sand beach area. IV. WATERFRONT RECREATION In its prime, North Beach was oriented to water-based recreation, with a popular swimming beach, pier and dance pavilion. It has today a major opportunity to take advantage of its waterfront location on Chesapeake Bay to meet a range of recreational interests. The waterfront recreation recom@- mendations are as follows: 0 The Town should acquire the privately@held portion of the beach to insure public access to the waterfront for swiming and other recreational activities. 0 The Town should acquire the privately@held pier and rebuild it to provide facilities for fishing, strolling, boating and dining. 0 Establish a public open space waterfront park at the foot of Fifth Street with a visible landmark such as a gazebo. o. Provide a public baywalk with trees, benches, and lights along the waterfront from First Street to Fifth Street which would connect with a walkway in the vicinity of the waterfront park and pier and would continue along the existing, but enlarged, boardwalk, ending at Atlantic Avenue. 0 Provide a Town bathhouse, changing rooms and toilets for recreation visitors. Xi o Open up the artesian well located on the beach near the pier as a drinking fountain and/or washing area. 0 Install nets offshore to protect swimmers from nettles and recreation boat traffic. V. COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION Decline in a commercial area stems from a wide variety of factors which have developed over time and which cannot be reversed overnight. Private investment is a necessary part of this revitalization effort. Following are the recom- mendations for private development and rehabilitation: 0 The IGA site has been identified as a central comer in the revitalization of the beach area. In the short term., it is recomended.that the existing buildings be rehabilitated and all Vacant and underutilized buildings be opened up for new retail uses. In the long tem, the site should be redeveloped retaining the IGA and adding additional retail space. 0 It is recommended that a new restaurant be constructed at the end of the rebuilt pier. 0 The Calvert Hotel structure should either be rehab- ilitated, if economically feasible, or, if not, the site should be redeveloped as a small inn. 0 The property on the southwest corner of Chesapeake Ave and Third Street should be redeveloped as a small hotel/inn. 0 The bowling alley/motel site on Bay Ave, in the short tem, should be rehabilitated and improved to perform a more retail function by opening up small retail space fronting on Fifth Street. The long term recommendation is to redevelop the property into beach oriented retail stores. 0 Implement the new water and sewer construction program. 0 Encourage infill construction of commercial buildings and uses on vacant lots in the commercial areas of Bay and Chesapeake Avenues. Xii MOM so No so ---------- non Vi. TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Adequate transportation arterials and access to the beach and commercial areas are important to the successful revitalizatiori of the area. Proper parking areas are also necessary to accommodate visitors. Following are the trans- portation and parking recommendations: . 0 Route 261 should be re-routed to run along Chesapeake Avenue from First Street to Seventh Street. 0 First Street should be one-way east from, Chesapeake Ave to Bay Ave and Bay Avenue should be one-way north from First Street to Seventh Street. 0 Fifth Street between Bay Avenue and Chesapeake Avenue should be one-way westbound in order to reduce potential traffic congestion at the Bay Avenue/Fifth Street intersection. 0 Atlantic Avenue would be one-way northeast between Seventh Street and Ninth Street. 0 Provide angle on-street parking on the west side of Bay Avenue between First Street and Seventh Street. 0 Additional off-street parking should be incor- porated, where feasible, in any new development proposals. 0 Angle parking should be provided for residents and visitors along Atlantic Avenue between Seventh Street and Ninth Street. 0 Public parking areas should be made available on current vacant parcels in the Town. The vacant parcels could be purchased or leased by the Town for such use. VII. DESIGN AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS One of the best opportunities for visible results, leading to greater commercial activity,, lies in improvement of the storefronts and in creation of a pleasant pedestrian environment. Following are the design and public improvement recommendations: 0 Develop design standards for conmiercial facades and provide architectural and financing assistance. 0 The design theme for both public and private improve- ments in North Beach should recall the best of beachfront x1v design as exemplified in the 1920's photograph of the Calvert Hotel. Th carry out this design theme, design standards, for commercial facades should be developed and adopted for public improvements and private rehabilitation/development. Architectural and financing assistance should be provided to encourage compliance withthe design standards. .0 Implement a strong code enforcement program to require commercial property owners to maintain their buildings and meet required health, safety and facade standards. 0 New concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters should be installed throughout the commercial area from First Street to Seventh Street and from Chesapeake Avenue to Bay Avenue. The sidewalks should be lined with shade trees, benches, decorative streetlights, trash receptacles and kiosks for advertising. VIII. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY The effectiveness of this North Beach Waterfront Revital- ization Plan depends upon the implementation of the major recommendations in an orderly fashion. The implementation of these recommendations will depend upon the support and encouragement of the citizens of North Beach, the responsiveness of the business community and property owners,, and the commitment of Thwn officials. Because evidence of public commitment to revitalization will be necessary before realistic private investment can take place, it is recommended that public acquisition of the beachfront and pier and public improvements begin as soon as funds can be made available. xv I I I I I CHAPTER I I INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I TNZBMLLCjjO A. Pugpose of this Waterfront Revitali7ation Plan., The purpose of this Waterfront Revitalization Plan is to provide the basis for future public and private improve- ments in the waterfront and coamrcial area of North Beach, Maryland. It includes general guidance for dealing with overall revitalization, as well as site specific proposals designed to encourage new private investment, and an identi- fication of necessary public actions. The revitalization goals and the Plan recommendations were developed with strong business and community involvement and support. B. Background. North Beach has had a strong and colorful history since the turn of the century when a railroad line out of Washington helped to create this delightful shoreside community. A group of investors, recognizing the resort potential of the area, formed what was to become the Chesapeake Beach Railroad Company, to lure Washingtonians away from the hot, dirty and overcrowded Capital. "Rail service was initiated in 1899 and development soon radiated from the railroad's terminus at Chesapeake Beach. Hotels, rooming houses, and restaurants were built to accommodate the crowds of vacationers, and summer homes were constructed in response to advertising promotions, stressing the qualities of seashore living.il At the peak of the railroad's business, more than 350,000 people rode the line to the beaches annually (see Figures 1 and 2). Located on the northeastern corner of Calvert County, North Beach benefits from a lovely setting on the Chesapeake lComprehensive Plan for North Beach. Maryland, 1974, pg 5. 2 NORTH BEACH MARYLAND The mo st delightful Summer Resort on Chesapeake Bay z 0 An WON North Beach, Md., is 25 years ahead of its competitors A Real Health and Pleasure Resort FIGURE -1 3 n lite 7- 14 0- &I T a-Nam --4 V - iL. M Am, C,to ((Ilwif Cot%tvS A. Afor """Will, "eight 7.. each pim" OR " r'"'I en e 710 . Cer 'fill,f ef"ce @;@ 0 Inc -Y th p XVL e S VV reight Low SP,141 ay p 'For IV' r ph Riles ta soft SjJvC ont one JV4 0, its, 14 e%l bra.l. I-AIRS OPPo,ite '13 ffv a, tee SAIVDVV ffe% .1 ............ Oil enP/e zolh f I"Ofill Crea., I I S110P irth 1Cq of 41'. 0! VLevlt- Ifrilli 7:@@ 13SP&IN 140VLCIA a h C. * IfIlpf"', p es - .. . 1 11111, Rear,,, 'etc. 3,ttefy coufteoos Ok, i sr''BVLO- te0alt 'Wier, A,1D 9L 0/ 0`11, Off, 11011111,1141 A! q 7 tj -T J!1- @oi @Ini 4 M)v m Li FIGURE 2 Bay (see Figure 3). It is bounded on the north by Ame Arundel Countyr and immediately to the south by Chesapeake Beach. At it_-@ height, before World War II, North Beach was known for its small hotels,, grand ballroomsr restaurants, and dining pier. In the mid-19301sr two events occurred which were to have a great impact on the future of North Beach., The great storm of 1933 destroyed the pier with its popular dance hall and Captain Oscar's Crab House, and washed away much of.the Town's beach. The same storm destroyed the large amusement park in Chesapeake Beach,, and eroded the steamboat pier which connected these shore camanities to the of Baltimore and its suburbs,. While the North Beach pier restaurant was rebuilt and opened for business as nUncle Billy's"j, business was never as brisk as it had been earlier. Leased to a series of different managers over the years, Uncle Billy's finally burned in the mid-19701s. The second event, the closing of the railroad line in 1935j, was of equal importance. Hulbert Footner, a residEnt of the Solomon's Island who wrote a history of Maryland in 1942, describes the last years of the railroad as. one of "wheezy locomotives and a dozen old-fashioned cars. It grew poorer and poorer, and finally expired."2 The decline -of the railroad, the availability of automobiles, and the eventual opening of the Eastern Shore#, occurred as North Beach was becoming more and more dependent upon slot machines as its main attraction. The change in attractions, from family facilities to gambling devices, brought about a significant change in the nature of the Town. Day trips replaced the extended stays which had characterized earlier tourists, and@taverns and bars replaced the once family oriented establishments. Even in its heyday, the summer and week-end crowds, who once swelled the populationt did not tend to invest in the community. They lived in small summr cottagess, with shallow wells and casual mainterance, or packed the'dl&fashicned motels and hotelst leaving little of permanence behind when they returned to their hcmes. When the State banned gambling in 1968, the economic stimulus for much of North Beach's business drained away. In its wake were left empty bars, shuttered hotels, and vacant shopfronts. 2Footner, Hulbeitt Maryland Main and tbP Eastprn Shore, New York#, Appleton-Century Co., 1942. 5 h 4 CN Annapolis 'Washington 40, Z; 1-402'. % Casten (PIZ, North do ask a% cam,brldg MONTH MEACM PLANNING ZONING 66111.180100 .00 % ,0, % % A L L I C A T I I I % urbanized area = MAT,@ 4w *. +4 10- -ma "a [email protected] Go [email protected]"'. m. ... armwe @ cap"Tax"T cw ST"a P"@Mm 0 FIGURE 3 At As though a symbol of the Town's decline, the beach area has undergone a process of erosion and change. What now remains is concentrated. in a block-long section which ,is divided between public and private ownership. Never really a large beach, the storm of 1933 created the need for two sea-walls at the north and south end of the Town, which have continued to influence wave movements and sand concentrations in the area. The shallow shoaling in much of the beach area acts as a detriment to recreational boat traffic. The long-pier,, which once was a featured attraction of the town, has suffered damage from stormst fire and neglect. Today, the commercial area and beach area of North Beach hold promise for the future. Given strong leadership, community backing, and a realistic plan, North Beach has the opportunity to gain control of its future and recreate the.best of its past. C. Rxiating Qnditinns.. 1. Population and Demographics. According to the 1980 Censusp the population of North Beach is 1j,504. This is almost a doubling of the population, within the Town since 1970 (see. Table 1) . In fact, North Beach has been growing steadily since the population was, 107 in. 1930. The population in Election District 3 in Calvert County, the District in which North Beach is- located, showed a similar doubling of its population between'1970 and 1980. District 3 had,the highest growth rate in the County.3 During the period between 1970 and 1980, the age distri- bution of the population in North-Beach changed considerably. The age comparison in Table 2 indicates that the population is getting younger. Even though there are more people in each age category in 1980 than there were in 1970, there are proportionally fewer people in the higher age categories and considerably more in the 15-24 and 25-34 age categories. This means that North Beach is becoming less a retirement community and more an area where younger individuals. and families are locating. People deciding to live in North Beach between'1975 and 1980 were drawn to North Beach from the surrounding area. Of all persons 5 years and over: 3Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland, A Statisti=1 Profile of Southern Marylanj, pg 4. 7 Table 1 North Beach Population 1930 - 1980 Percentage Change Total in Population Populatim over the PrgMious Period 1930 107 - 1940 246 130% 1950 314 28% 1960 606 93% 1970 761 26% 1980 1,,504 98% Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980; Comprehensive Plan for North Beach,, Maryland,, 1974 Table 2 North Beach Population Distribution By Age Group 1970 - 1980 Numbe % Diatributio IM IM 1-970 3.9-LO Under 5 Yrs 67 165 8.8 11.0 5 14 160 262 21.0 17.4 15 24 68 250 8.9 16.6 25 34 79 276 10.4 18.4 35 44 85 155 11.2 10.3 45 54 89 105 11.7 7.0 55 64 102 138 13.4 9.2 65+ ill 153 14.6 10.2 Total 761 1,504 100.0 100.0 Source: U.S.. Census of Population and Housing, 1980; Comprehensive Plan for North Beach, Maryland, 1974 8 0 47% of North Beach residents lived in the same house in 1975 and 1980. 0 15% of the people in North Beach in 1980 lived els ewhere in Calvert County in 1975. 0 33% of the people living in North Beach in 1980 lived elsewhere in Maryland in 1975. 0 Only 5% of the North Beach residents in 1980 had moved to Town f rom out of state since 1975.4 2. Economic Conditions. a. Emplnymant. There are currently not many employment opportunities within the Town of North Beach. There is no industry and there are few retail or service positions available. Although there is potential for recreation and tourism related employment opportunities, these areas have not yet been f ully exploited. Implementation of the waterfront and commercial revitalization recommendations to be discussed in the later chapters could significantly increase the employment base in North Beach. Currently, 65% of the approximately 600 North Beach employed residents work outside Calvert County or. outsidethe state. Although 23% of the residents worked within the County, the figures do not indicate how many are employed in the Town. Twelve percent of residents did not report their place of work.5 The vast majority of employed residents work for private firms (75%). Eleven percent of residents work for the federal government, 4% work for the state government and 11% work for local government.6 The Construction industry employs the most North Beach residents (20%), followed by Retail Trade (19%) and Public Administration (18% ).7 4U,S, Census of Ponulation and HoUgiagr 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, North Beach, Item 21. 5U_,S.--Census of PopUlation and HbU", 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, North Beach, Item 32. 6U -S. Census of Population and HoUg", 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, North Beach, Itern 30. 7U-S. Cgnsus of PopUlation and HoU", 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, North Beach, Item 29. 9 b. Business. There are approximately 33 businesses in North Beach (see the Appendix for a list). Retail and service food and drinking establishments seem to have a large share of current business activity in North Beach. Some new businesses have added diversity to the Town in recent years. They include Nice 'N Fleazy antiques, Floral Designs, and Carlson-Jameson Inc. Art & Design. c. Housing. According the Census, there are 730 year-round housing units in North Beach. Almost 40% of the units were built before 1939. An additional 25% were built in the 1940's and 22% more built during the 1950's. By the beginning of the 1960, 86% of North Beach's housing stock had been built.8 During the period 1975 to 1978, households moving into North Beach tended to be owners (see Table 3). But since 1979, there have been more renters choosing to live in Town. Of the total of 556 occupied housing units in 1980, 394 or 71% were owner occupied. d. Income. Median household income in 1979 according to the Census was $14,800.9 3. Land Use and Zoning. a. Existing Land Use. A survey of land use was taken in the waterfront and commercial areas. Figure 4 is a map identifying the existing land use. Commercial uses predominate along Bay Avenue between Third and Seventh Streets. Commercial and institutional uses are prevalent along Chesapeake Ave between First and Fifth Streets. Vacant commercial buildings and land dot the commercial areas. Other areas are predominately residential, especially property facing the Bay. Figure 5 shows the pattern of property ownership. b. Historic and Unique Architectural Structures. The Calvert Hotel is probably the most significant historic and architectural structure in the waterfront and commercial area. A discussion of this vacant Hotel and recomendation are included in a later Chapter. Other structures such 8U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, North Beach, Item 12. 9U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, North Beach, Item 51. 10 Table 3 North Beach Occupied'Housing Units By Tenure and By Year Household Moved Into Unit 1980 Owne lRente Thta Dist, Dist. Dist, 1979 to 3/1980 71 18.0 94 58.0 165 29.7 1975 - 1978 126 32.0 46 28.4 172 30.9 1970 - 1974 74 18.8 10 6.2 84 15.1 1960 - 1969 83 21.1 9 5.6 92 16.5 1950'- 1959 30 7.6 0 0.0 30 5.4 1949/ earlier 10 2.5 3 1.9 13 2.3 Total 394 100.0 162 100.0 556 100.0 Source: U. S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980 as the IGA building and Ewalds have interesting architectural elements but are not unique architecturally. Historically, they and other commercial buildings have a past that is worthy of preserving but this does not necessarily mean that the structures must be retained. Decisions about re- habilitation or redevelopment should be based on a case by case analysis taking into consideration the economics of rehabilitation vs redevelopment and the resulting benefits to the Town. The rationale will be discussed in a later chapter for design standards to preserve what is best in existing commercial structures and to assure that new cam-ercial structures will fit the image that the Thwn wishes to achieve. C. Pxigting Zoni . The existing zoning pattern in the waterfront and commercial area is given in Figure 6. The zoning information was taken f rom the North Beach Zoning Ordinance.10 Most of the land in the waterfront and camnercial area is zoned MCR (Marine Commercial Recreation District) . The MCR zone is a zone which permits a variety of mixed use development. D. The Steering Committep Procass. In June 1983, businessr property owners, and citizen representatives were appointed to the North Beach Steering Committee, chaired by Mayor W. Alan Gott. The purpose of this committee was to facilitate public and private participation in the development of goals, and to assist in the identification of priority sites for redevelopment and rehabilitation. The function of the Committee members was to: � represent their constitutent viewpoints (i.e. citizen, property owner, goverment represent- ative), 0 inform their constituent groups. on progress being made, � solicit their constituents comments, � present draft goals for public comment and approval, and 102oning Ordinann-A fnr thp Thwn of North Reach. ralver County. Maryland. Adopted: January 9, 1975. Amended: April 14, 1977. 14 0 present the draft recommendations for public, comment and approval. The Committee met six times over the course of the program, and held five public sessions and briefings on the goals and proposed recommendations. STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS 1. Chairman, Mayor W. Alan Gott Business Representatives 2. Dale Thomas, Nice "n" Fleazy Antiques 3. Wilson Sneade, Sneade's Hardware Community Representatives 4. Vic Scuderi, Resident 5. Ken Baake, Resident 6. Bill Jenkins, North Beach Planning Commission 7. Betty Jameson, North Beach Planning Commission Government Representatives 8. Trisha Bednarz, Department, of Natural Resources, State of Maryland, Annapolis 9. Vivian Marsh, Office of Planning, Calvert County 10. Marianne Clark, Office of Economic Development, Tri-County Council. 16 CHAPTER II REVITALIZATION GOALS CHAPTER II BMTALI%ATTON MATS On August, 24, 1983, the following goals were presented in a public briefing to the community for review and comment. Following a thorough explanation of the proposed goals by the Steering Committee and the consultantst the goals were adopted by consensus. These goals helped to guide the deve1qj:>-- ment of the site specific recommendations included in this report. Promote controlled and attractive change to improve the waterfront and commercial areas of North Beachr so that it serves the needs of the Town as well as a broader camunity by generating revenue, while remaining sensitive to the unique character of the Town. Public! Drnrnymentsi 0 Improve the water and sewer system to enable the appropriate tApes of %aterfrcnt and commercial improvements to occur. 0 Make appropriate beach improvements that are realistic. 0 Provide the necessary facilities to protect and enlarge the shoreline. 0 Provide public facilities along the waterfront to enhance its recreational potential, such as benches, bath houses, toilets, picnic tables, trees, landscaping and a public pier. 0 Increase and enhance public access to the beach and water. 0 Provide a waterfront walkway along the shore. 18 0 Develop adequate off-street parking and improve on-street parking. Tssuas of T%-VPI QP=i- 0 Promote appropriate commercial development within the commercial core in a manner which is sensitive to the adjacent residential areas, 0 Create a focal point for the commercial area on Bay Avenue and 5th Street and unite it with the waterfront improvements. 0 Identify priority sites for development within the commercial core. 0 Retain and attract high quality businesses to the commercial area. Tssuas of ahi I i tat- J on! 0 Encourage rehabilitation of camercial buildirygs which are structurally sound and are eccnanically feasible. 0 Identify priority sites for rehabilitation within the commercial core. TASUPS of Design: 0 Develop design standards for cmnLercial building facades in the waterfront and commercial area which enhance the unique qualities of North Beach. 0 Rehabilitation and new construction should be consistent with the established design standards. 19 CHAPTER III THE BEACH AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER III T14E BE&Q.-AND-THE-NATURAL-ENVT Qj= A. The purpose of this chapter and analysis. is to ensure the developnent of revitalization strategies for North Beach which are sensitive to the limitations of the natural environ- ment. The recommendations of this chapter are integral to the success of the revitalization of the waterfront and the conmrcial area. B. The Shoraline of the Nnrtb Raach*Watarfront- The shoreline in North Beach has largely been modified by the placement of shore erosion structures, (approximately 3,125 feet of the total 3r775 feet, or 82.7% of tow %aterfront is contained by various types of structures), most of which have apparently been in place since the early or mid-1930's. The land-water boundary along the Chesapeake Bay typically can be categorized as belonging to one of ten individual shoreline types as originally identified by Ahnert et al. (1974). These shoreline types are defined as: 1. Shoreline without beach or bluff. 2. Beach greater than 20 feet in width. 3. Beach against headland 0-20 feet high. 4. Beach against headland greater than 20 feet high. 5. Headland less than 20 feet high, no beach. 6. Headland greater than 20 feet high, no beach. 21 7. Fringe marsh (width between 0 and 100 feet). 8. Intermediate width marsh (width between 100 and 400 feet). 9. Extensive marsh @width greater than 400 feet). 10. Deltaic marsh (marsh containing mouth of tributary). According to a report by the Tidewater Administration, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, the shoreline in North Beach is representative of shoreline Type 2 (beach greater than 20 feet in width).11 Most of the swimming beach is obviously in category 2, however much of the North Beach shoreline could be categorized as belong to category 5 (headland less than 20 feet high, no beach) , because of the bulkheading with no beach at the. toe. However, if there was no bulkheading along the present shoreline in North Beach, the waterfront would have reached beyond Bay Street and perhaps further into Town. C. r1pomornhir- History of the Vicinityu The formation of the landscape in and around North Beachr as well as the entire Chesapeake Bay region, is the result of a multitude of rapid changes in the height of the sea level during the last two million years. As the sea level rose and fell more than 100 feet above and below its present level, sediments continually gathered along the ancient seashore until the rapid changes in sea level slowed, and the sea level assumed its present position. It is the legacy of this type of landform. (coastal deposits) to be highly. erodible and the shorelines are often subject to rapid "parallel retreat" as the waters of the Chesapeake Bay carry away the soil material from the base of the shoreline bluffs. As these shoreline bluffs erode, the material that is carried away by the water currents is deposited either up or down the Bay. The place of deposition is dependent upon the width and size of the soil material. Typically llMaryland Department of Natural Resources, Tidewater Administration, An Assessment of Shnrp Ernsion in Northern Chesapeake Bay and of the Performanep. of Erosion Control 22 the lighter material (slit and clay) is carried farther away from its source and will end up on the bottom of the Bay or in one of the many marshes lining the Bay shoreline. The heavier material (sand, coarse sand and fine gravel) will often be left along the adjacent shoreline and later transported "down" the shoreline by longshore currents. As these shorelines erode and sand is left at the base of the bluffs, beaches are formed. Additionally as these beaches formt the beach material (sand) is transported along the beach in the direction of the prevailing currents. This process continues through tim and eventually an eguilibrium condition is reached whereby certain areas of shoreline have beaches while other areas may have a marsh or a bluff with no beach. Consequently it can be said that scm shorelines, through the erosion process, create sand, while others collect sand thus forming beaches. D. Histnrit-al Cbangpg in tl= Shorplinp in, North &--ach- The Historical Shorelines and Erosion Rates Atlas 12 gives a comparison of the shoreline location in 1847, 1934, and 1972. Historically, the shoreline of North Beach has undergone considerable change during the period of 87 years between 1847 to 1934 (see Figure 7). During this time, much of the original shoreline was eroded into the Bay. Cn the other hand, there is a portion of i wetland (Atlantic Avenue area) which was "reclaimed" during this period. The filling of this area extended the shoreline toward the Bay about 200 feet. Additionally, the shoreline from Third Street to the south has lost approx- imately 200 feet; 100 feet of which was bulkheaded and filled bayside between 1934 and 1938. The shoreline from the northern tip of the Atlantic Avenue bulkhead to the northern end of the Town boundary had eroded the fastest (approximately 9 feet/year) during this period. However, this high rate of erosion has slowed considerably since the 1934 survey. It is human nature to protect those things which we value. And so, as the shore erosion progressed, and the shoreline came closer and closer to homes, roads, etc. in North Beachr shore erosion structures (bulkheading and groins) were put in place to stop the further advance of the Bay waters. 12Tidewater Administration, 1972. 23 00, "Z 13 /Old Cojon@/ ove R -Rose Hmen p .@j C! 83ke -A RVII@;D E L C-A LVERT 46 _7@ t--t. a North Beach 4p. z')P 1847 SHORRINE 193-4 SHORELINE N\ @\\' 'x, BASE MAP SHORELINE 1970 "St Beach FIGU FIE While the citizens of North Beach were building shore erosion structures, the other inhabitants of the waterfront north and south were doing the same.. Tioday, along the entire coastline north and south of North Beachr there are many residences adjacent to the waterfront with their required erosion control structures. This condition has blocked the creation of new beach material normally created through shoreline erosion which was the source of sand previously "feeding" the North Beach beaches. In addition, the longshore current (littoral drift) which carries sand along the shoreline has not been sufficiently altered to stop the movement of sand from the North Beach shoreline to other areas. As a result of these dynamics, the beaches of North Beach have diminished in size when compared to the beaches of an earlier era. E. Littoral aogesses Along the North agggh Qgrel' The process involved in the movement of sediments up or down a beach has been aptly described in an Army Corps of Engineers publication: Waves breaking on a beach generate a longshore current that flows through the area where they break (breaker zone) . Alone, it is generally too weak to move appreciable quantities of sedinmt; however, the turbulence from breaking waves suspends sediments. that can then be moved downdrift by the longshore current. This sediment generally settles out within a short distance, but the next wave provides additional movement. Therefore, longshore transport is caused by the zig-zag movement of bedload up and down the beach, and the turbulenpe- and action of the wave-induced longshore current.13 The direction of the longshore currents may change through time depending on changes in prevailing wind directicn as well as tidal currents. There may be seasonal variation in longshore currents both in terms of the direction of sediment, movement and the rate of movement. The transport directions may also be highly irregular and dependent on the local storms. The prevailing direction of longshore transport may be identified for a particular point in time by examining structures that partially or completely. impede DArmy Corps of Engineers, Low Cost Shore Protection.,t.A Guide for Engineers and Contractor , 1981. 25 the longshore transport of sediment (groins and jetties). Sand will be deposited on the up-drift side of the structure which will identify thedirection of recent longshore sedimEnt transport. Work done by Coastal and Offshore ENhieering and Pasearcho, Inc., for the Department*of Natural Resources in 1982 idEntified the net annual littoral drift for North Beach to be approxhmitely "0". The shoreline adjacent to Atlantic Avenue may have a low net annual drift to the north of approximately 15,000. to 20,000 cubic yards per year. However, due to the short length of beach along Atlantic Avenue, this estimation of net transport may be too high. F. Coastal Minrpholaa of the North PPach SIn rt-1 i ng. The form and structure (morphology) of the beach zone is a result of: 1) , wave energy distribution, 2) nature and quantity of sediment supplyp and 3) littoral prooesses (longshore currents) of sediment transportation. In the previous secticnst these elements of beach dynamics have been briefly discussed. This section will present beach profiles which are cross- sectional drawings made from direct measurements of the North Beach shorelines during August and September of 1983. It is important to understand that the shoreline along any beach area is in constant changef as one storm moves throught the beach zone adjusts to the particular size and type of wave energy in that storm. As the seasons pass, new storms move through and cause new changes in the beach zone, By taking direct measurements along the shoreline, approximations of the physical form and structure of,the beach zone can be developed. These profiles will be used later to calculate the required amount of sand that will be needed to complete the beach nourishment project. Addition- ally, the profiles will be used to determine the amount of bottom sediments that will require dredging if a marina is to be constructed. The profiles presented in Figures 9 through 11, were taken just once for each location. It is important to note that more profiles should be taken throughout the year if a more accurate estimation of the beach structure is to be developed. The profiles represent seven locations along the full length of the North Beach shoreline. See the location map (Figure 8). 26 @aWMR-'n 4E; i - K L 7t M-4 A6 ED, FIGURE 8 - @40 i do,, -n c m TRANSECT-1 W +6- Lu +4- W +3- 0) +2- w ui r%a m U.1 0- 03 z -2- BOTTOm -4- _j -5 @w 6. 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 DISTANCE (FEET) TRANSECT-2 LLJ +6- > c LU +5 - m +4- M UJ +3- +2- 0 LU ui LU 0 Z -2- BOTTOM -4- ui -j sj 6 20 40 60 so 100 140 160 DISTANCE (FEET) N3 TRANSECT-3 LU +6- LLJ +5 - +4- W +3- cl) +2- w > +1 0 -p uj ca uj 0 z -2- 0 -82UTO@m 4- w w 1 -11 - 6 20 40 60 so 100 120 140 160 180 DISTANCE (FEET) TRANSECT-4 W +6 > c LLJ < +4- m LLI +3 - +2 - LU co ui 0 z 2 --B-O-T-To-m@ 0 3 - I- � 4- w _j -s- w -6 -J 20 40 60 80 1@0 1;0 14'0 160 180 DISTANCE (FEET) CD TRANSECT-5 W +6 W +5 +4 W +3 +2 ui >- +1 Op uj o Ca Lu < 1!!:- 1 z -2 1-0-1 TIOM 0 .3 -4 w -s -j w -6 20 40 60 so 100 120 140 160 iso DISTANCE (FEET) TRANSECT - 6 -n Uj +6- > Lu +5 - c -i m +4 m LJJ +3 W > ol.- (h UJ o' Lij +2 +1 ui < -1- Z -2 U- 0 3 --B-OTTOM 5 -14 LU _j -s- w 6-1 20 40 60 so 100 120 140 160 1130 DISTANCE (FEET) TRANSECT-7 W +6 - LU +S - -j +4 - LU +3 - a) +2 - w > ol.- LU 0 Co Lu < iA- z - 2 0 -3 BOTTOM -4 LU -i w 5 -6 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 DISTANCE (FEET) G. Reach Nburisim-ent Ali--PrnaHyP--,- Because of the loss of sand over theyearso, a beach nourishment program is being recommended. Beach nourishment is the placing of quanities of sand along a shoreline for erosion abatement purposes and/or increasing recreational opportunities. The sand that is placed along the beach can be transported by hydrolic means (suction dredging) from nearby.offshore shoal deposits or through overland hauling by trucks. In order for suction dredging to be cost effective, the distance from the source of sand to the disposal site needs to be no more than 7#,200 feet (see Figure 13). If there is no suitable dredging site available within 7,200 feet, then overland trucking may be necessary. Trucking sand to the beach from a landbased source is the least desirable alternative because of the greatly increased cost involved in the loading and unloading of the sand. Beach nourishment will protect the existing headland by acting as a buffer zone, keeping the wave action away from the erodible soil. If the newly created beach has a potential for convercial recreational uses, then the beach nourishment project may have the ability to continually pay for the maintenance over time. The benefits of this type of erosion control are cbvious wt*n cmpared to alternatives which often cost as much-and do not generate revenue. The actual amount of sand that should be placed on a particular beach is determined by evaluating the erosion potential at the particular shoreline and by determining the amount of beach material available for cost effective placement on the beach. H. al Dot-ing Altprnatiygug. There is a shortage of marina and boat ramp facilities in the northern portion of Calvert County, according to the Maryland Department of State Planning's "Outdoor Recreaticn and Open Space Plan, and the Department of Natural Resources. Because of its proximity to Washington, D.C., Annapolis, and Baltimore, North Beach offers an ideal location for construction of these facilities. It is within 60 miles, the "maximum desirable travel time" to all these metropolitan centers. Additionally, the low level of congestion in recre- ational boating activity that currently exists in the waters off North Beach make marina developnent especially desirable. It is extremely congested to the north (see Figure 13.). 32 INN Hill 26 put C v M 10. H @Qujmmv In DAY. raft c Point P.A GW"VNdW mou"Vim P*Mbm Eant gh %0 Holly VSR- Cop, Mod. Br=pdat 1Wd Vi- B." Nn@ AN, Arbut n N- BAY P-1, p k pCt 16!a yfigm Ttbd. Bomb R-4h. miu- Hig. 21 SPA, H Fort Homnod No .-.a, to Mtnor 'p, ps R C Ad i ftountne 1W-p- Job- YH .=v - Q, Ak, 20 Nm roft S...U.-d Hi N Edes, ,ky psdinm B..h Gtitd. SyW" B-h A! Rook H Croby road 445 Hop. vh- 0 kc @,,- F ad 0 ps Gib- Th. na at& M Z. SL Cib. h. -Hm E@ Point rhi t.ViU. p - th. By Ov -71 11A TA PA2K +4 ANN Idd'. N, A. NAVAL 2Xp.1A`A`oNV APOLIS rbt. Smah ch" N@ 50 r9vT R ALE E otto@ B,3 Wu P-k \ 0, J y -c WNd A.Vab bK." Id." sast"',-N Rommoskm -6.0 Ilrr 4 bd& Area of frequent @dbu' Wil boating accid ts cia- - .; I Imm 4 r MaDani d T aft M ps A sr. t&HAEts oody" 0 3M Cot" kj-d nd] Circle with radi 3 TWbart Of 7200 feet B mob WNW A,.j- K*" W h F.od- y padft" Kk M, b- C' Pandis B-h Ac C-k H B.-b In CEDARV E 'L @,vo 41 211 C STA Bmab 14., Point Wdf FO isr Hm 3a adat. IANVI H.2ad Point Hm. Point Cuff c- 5 cot Wri t. Green Aquamoo J.- pdarb.- M- H. 4a PRINCE DERTCK YL P-k. Glik VON L@TA 231 Bat- Sd andint Cliff Sund So*- -,,B Ell Md@@, bLi. .1 k- Ron K@ @h Got to H C, 4i, Z N--k.t Id Do Hunt-di. ot Calvat Beach T. L. Sftblal. H.11 Betch I .d FIGURE 13" % WWI* m comy & -r A, V@ Another important regarding marina develcpnent is that the waters adjacent to North Beach have a flushing rate sufficient to avoid the concentrating of pollutants in quiet back waters typical of most marina sites. I. Protpc+ion From 14igb Ways- Enprgy' The construction of a marina facility in North Beach will require the installation of protective devices for avoiding destruction from seasonal storm waves. Due to the exposure of the North Beach shorelines, there is need for either a breakwater or a seawall around the marina docks. Structures such as these keep the storm waves from reaching the boats that are moored within the marina. Construction of this type is also very costly and will present a hurdle that must be cleared prior to the locating of a marina in North Beach. J. nrWging In addition to the construction of protective devices such as seawalls or breakwatersp there will be a certain amount of dredging needed for any boating uses that require more than a few f eet of draft. The shoal area adjacent to North Beach is both shallow and expansive. There will be a need for considerable dredging if the Town of North Beach is to have a marina capable of accommodating popular recreational boats. The amount of dredging has been estimated and is presented in the Appendix. In additional to the initial dredging, there will be periodic maintenance dredging required in order to keep the previously dredged channel f ree f rom shoaling. The rate of shoaling can be slowed by protecting the channel from wave action with stone jetties. These structures are expensive and a cost/benefit analysis will need to be carried out to determine the relative value of their construction. When the initial dredging is done, there will be the need to have an upland dredge spoil disposal site located within 7200 feetr if the dredging project is to be cost effective (See Figure 13). There is the possibilityr if the dredged material is of proper size and character, that it can be used to rebuild the beachr thus significantly cutting costs. Maintenance dredging, and a site for this fill, will also have to be considered. 34 RR I menaurgg"em Am 1. The Beach. Due to shoreline dynamics, the beach in North Beach is too small for effective erosim abatement or ommercial recreational development. This study recommends the rebuilding of the beach as a means of addressing both the erosion control issue and the need to provide recreational opportunities. The sand An attempt to find properly sized sand in the shoal area offshore should be made. This would significantly reduce costs. If this shoal area material Is unsuitable,, another source will have to be identified. Estimates of total volumes and costs of transportation are found in the Appendix. Pgarh Prnf il eq- Further analysis of the littoral conditions should be made to determine the gross transport of sediment along the shoreline adjacent to North Beach. Beach profiles should also be made periodically throughout the next year as a means of identifying the annual changes in the shoreline. qf-nrnwai-pr Thinof f All stormwater outfalls that are eroding the sand beach and the proposed sand beach should be redirected to avoid runoff on the beach. 2. Waterfront Structures. FUil khP;;r1q Most of the bulkheads in North Beach are in weakened condition. New structures will need to be constructed unless an alternative solution can be found. One alternative is beach nourishment, which can be both cost/ef fective and prevent erosion. If further studies don't support the need for the existing groinso, they should be remved. 35 Atlantic Avp- Currently the batterpil e bulkhead along Atlantic Avenue has a flankwall which is generating a reflective wave which attacks the shoreline to the north. This condition should be stopped by changing the configuration of the bulkhead or by interrupting the reflective process by placing large stone or some other suitable material at the foot of the bulkhead. 3. Marina Development. i=1 Roat-ing The Town should begin now to developt as much as possibleo, recreational boating activity alcng the %eterfrcnt. This can be done by taking advantage of the pier., possibly extending it, and offering services and attractions to boaters from.other areas. In addition to this, there is an immediate potential to begin a rental service for smaller sailboats (catamaranso, daysailors and sailboards) without incurring a heavy initial investment. There is a great need for a recreational boating marina in the vicinity of North Beach. Due to the shoreline configurationr the costs will be high. The Town should pursue State supported programs such as the Safe Harbors Program, Capital Program Administration and the Waterways Improvements Division of the Tidewater Administration for funding assistance. Marina development will require a proper dredged channel. The dredged sand fromthis channel should be analyzed for suitability for the proposed expanded beach.. Such a' possibility will significantly reduce costs for both the dredging and the beach nourishment projects. If the sand is not suitable for beach enrichment, a f ill site will have to be identified for proper disposal 36 of the dredged material. This site should be within 7,200 f eet of the proposed channel. Allowance should be made for identitring and acquiring the land. 37 CHAPTER IV WATERFRONT RECREATION CHAPTER IV WMERFRONT RECREATION A. There is a notable trend around the countryt on the part of both large cities and small townsp to enhance their waterfronts for a variety of uses. Some of the most successful of these undertakings have had recreation as a key component of their waterfront revitalization. This is true for large cities,, such as Baltimore and Boston; medium-size camunities, such as Savannah and Bradentont Florida; and small towns, such as Beaufortr South Carolina, and Edmunds, Washington, to cite only a few. The experience of these and comparable communities is that the provision of waterfront recreation stimulates nearby commercial activityl and serves as a complement to commercial growth. The waterfront festival market trendr most visible in Baltimore (Harborplace),, and Boston (Faneuil Hall),, and now in Norfolk and New York Cityp features a successful combination of waterfrcnt qpen space and opportunity with lively shopping areas. supporting this trend to increased use of waterfront sites is the country's cleaner waters. And widle the Chesapeake Bay has significant pollution problems, it too has benefited from major cleanup efforts along its source rivers. The growth of interest in waterfronts as sites for varied community endeavors constitutes an appreciation that the territory at the water's edge is a prime community asset and a relatively scarce resource. A community such as North Beach possesses an unrealized opportunity to capitalize on a prime asset - its waterfront. Its close-in location to the major markets of Washington, D.C. and Baltimore,, makes it an attractive recreational destination. At the same time, North Beach should also take, care to see that its efforts to attract private hwestment 39 do not seal off the waterfront from public use and access. This access includes taking care not to block waterfront views. At each of the community meetings held. during the devel- opment of this plan,, restoration of the beach for recreational use was a priority concern. Almost equal in importance was the stated desire for boat launching facilities. A recent study by the Maryland State Planning Department shows that there is a serious absence of such facilities on the Bay, (478,444 "occasions" demanded in 1980 - estimated - and only 500 such occasions available.)14 B. Ideas From Other Areas. North Beach can benefit from the examples of successful waterfront revitalization programs in towns of comparable size around the nation. Among such examples are: 0 Street End Parks Port Jefferson N.Y. small pavilion and park Cold Spring N.Y. gazebo 0 Public Pier Edmunds, Washington fishing pier and beach Sarasota, Florida fishing pier Newport, Rhode Island pier with restaurant 0 Walkways Grand Haven, Michigan Spring Lake,, New Jersey Beaufort, South Carolina (Chambers Park & Promenade) 0 Bath House/ Greenport, N.Y. Beach Facilities Stony Brook, N.Y. 0 Boat Launch Baltimore Middle Branch C. Analysis of Existing Recreation Opportunities In its heyday, North Beach was oriented to water-based 14Maryland Outdoor Recreation & Open Space Plan, 1978, pg A-44. 40 recreation, with a popular swimming beachr pier and dance pavilion. It has today a major opportunity to take advantage of its waterfront location on the Chesapeake Bay to meet a range of recreational interests, from passive strolling to active motor boating. The existing facilities with a potential for recreation include the following: 0 Privately-owned beach in front of IGA store, 0 Limited public beach, 0 Small snack food concession on beach,, 0 Bowling alley, poolhall and bars on Bay Avmm,, 0 Informal fishing along Bay and Atlantic Avemese, 0 Small boardwalk between Fifth and Seventh Streets on the beachr 0 Playground on Fourth Streete, two blocks from the waterfront, and 0 Fenced-off crescent-shaped beach on the north end of Town. Much of the Town's beach has been seriously eroded, most dramatically along Bay Avenue at Third Street. Parking is perceived as a problem for visitors and residents. There are no bath houses or attractive public conveniences for the visitor. The North Beach pier which previously provided fishing#, boat access, dining and dancing is closed. There is an absence of boat-launching facilities with nearby parking. D. 0 UMCN CONCEM AND 1. Pnhl in Pi Aad_BCStAUgant, a. Obioni-Ly-et Re-establish the pier at Fifth Street as a centerpiece of the waterfront for North Beach to serve multiple objectives#, such as strolling, eating, fishing and boat- docking. - b. The pier itself holds a key to revitalization of North Beach because 41 of its visibility and symbolism. Because it is central,,(and piers have proven thewelves to be immensely popular in many waterfront communities Huntington Beachr Calif. and Ocean City, N.J., for example), restoration of the pier in North Beach would help restore com=ity pr ide. It is recommended, therefore, that the Town acquire the pier (Figure 14) and the surrounding privately held beach to insure full. and open public access for all. For this central property to remain a private holding with restricted access would cripple the Town's efforts to become, once againr a popular family center. The structural condition of the pier should be analyzed to determine what can be salvaged, and to produce a cost/effective and stormr- resistant design. A F North Beach Pier 42 A detailed design should be prepared of a multi-purpose pier, including a dining areas, boat-docking, and provision for recreational fishing. The Town should determine the most cost/effective manner of redeveloping the pier: eitber through a public-private partnershipf or lease-back arrangements. Possible sources of state financial assistance should be examined. T3ere is petidjM legislAaUcin in the U. S. Congress which would establish a new source of federal assistance for boating facilities. This new program, if approved,, would be administered by the State. 2. Wat rfront Park. a. QbJPctiy&; Establish a public.open space at the foot of Fifth Streett with an attractive landmark, such as a gazebo. b. imi Acquire the beach area curren y in private aaiership, and the adjoining parking area on Bay Avenue at Fifthr or enter into a long-term lease agreement that insures continued public access to this area. Prepare a detailed site plan for the waterfrcnt park which could including marry of the follawiM components (see Figure 15): 0 A gazebo/pavilion with interior seating which could serve as a band shell, speaking platform or stage. This structure would be a community focal point at the foot of Fifth Street. 0 A flagpole or large sculpturer with flowers, trees, picnic tables and benches. 0 A carousel. 0 A kiosk with conn=ity information, events, historic background, map of the businesses. 43 n 2!@ 000- ... ....... WATERFRONT PARK FIGURE 15. o A children's spray/play area on the beach, perhaps like the one in Stony Brook, New York. 3. Baywalk. a. Objective: Provide a public promenade along the waterfront in central North Beach to enhance access to the Bay for residents and, tourists and to separate foot trafic from automobile usage. b. Recommendation: Prepare a design for a Baywalk which should include the following consideration (see Figure 16): 0 An elevated (off the pavement) wooden boardwalk (or other suitable flood-resistant material) along the water's edge on Bay Avenue, from First Street to Fifth Street. This could be constructed in stages, with the first section between Third and Fifth Streets. 0 Connect the proposed Baywalk with the existing boardwalk in front of the homes on the beach. This existing boardwalk should be widened to the same width as the proposed Baywalk. Such a connection would tie together the Bay Avenue waterfronts, to the waterfront park, and pier. 0 Provide benches, trash receptacles, trees, planting boxes and lighting. 0 Consider some type of decoration along the Baywalk such as flags on town light poles, or perhaps hanging plant baskets. 4. Public Bathhouse a. Objective: Provide town bathhouse, changing rooms and toilets for day visitors, at a nominal cost, to serve as an attraction for beach use. 45 A M -MA-- Existing View on Bay, Avenue Proposed Baywalk ......... . FIGURE 16 46 b. Rpc!nmmPndaf- inn: Working with the -private property owners, determine the best location of such a facility within the first block of the beach. Examine the financing options; public construction and long term lease, or private operation under Town controls. Provide convenience sales/rentals of such items as towels and umbrellas. Security and cleanliness have to be prmary consideration for such a facility to.succeed. (Belmar,, New Jersey, is a good exanple of the facilities which exist on the Jersey shore near New York.) 5. Rnat Launch- a. Ohiective: To meet the stated need for boat launching facilities,, with nearbyy convenient parking, to serve as an attraction for a different clientel than the beach and pier, and to separate this activity from the town center., Figure 17 Marina/Boat Launch Site ri 47 b. Rpc!Qmmpndaj;jon: Explore the feasibility of locating a town launch ramp facility at the north end of town at the site of a previous marina, or encourage a private operator at this site (Figure 17). Provide parking nearby with a wooden walkway (providing an opportunity for a nature walk/inter- pretive signs) through the marsh area. A' second choice, if the northern site is unavailable, may be a pier and hoist installation on Bay Avenue between First and Third Streets with parking upland. 48 CHAPTER V COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION CHAPTER V. COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION A. Tntr Atint- ion The commercial core of North Beach, once a vibrant and vigorous economy, has today, all but disappeared. In the early decades of this century, Chesapeake Avenue was lined with shops, offering all the goods and services necessary to support a family-oriented community; ranging from the old Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, to movie houses, shoe stores and dress shops. Now, much of the land which used to support these businesses lies vacant. And many of those commercial buildings which do remain are in serious need of repair. Chesapeake Avenue between First and Fifth Streets, once the heart of the commercial area, still retains,a hardware store, the Post officer the rehabilitated Town Hall, religious institutions,, a restaurant, and several small shops. But large vacant lots, strategically located on the corners of Chesapeake and Chestnut Streets; Third and Chesapeake; and Fifth and Chesapeake destroy the sense of "place", the feeling of "Main Street" which was so evident in the 1920's and 301s. Perhaps as important as the physical deterioration of the business area has been the gradual disappearance of choice and variety in the types of goods and services available in North Beach.. Where once beach concessions, restaurants, dance halls, rooming houses, shops and theaters stood, now there is a concentration of bars, pool halls and lounges. 50 The IGA store on the corner of Fifth and Bay Streets, and the new Highs on Seventh and Bay act as the central food and small merchandise stores in Town. The IGA store acts as the principal.economic anchor of North Beach. B. Cbmged Naturp of Rpt-ailing- The decline of the business area in North Beach is not unique. Much of the reason for its decline lies not only with the specific conditions and history of North Beach, but equally with the changed nature of retailing in America. In the 1930's and 19401s, most,shopping in small caTmzdties took place on the main street with family members making regular purchases, often several times a week. The scarcity of good roads and personal cars insured that most town residents shopped in the local area. Following World War II, especially in the 1950's and 19601s, along with the growth of the suburbs, and the irr-reased use of personal cars, came the development of a new concept in retailing - the suburban.shopping mall. These malls were designed to be "one-stop" locations, where a large anchor store, such as a department store or grocery store, was complemented by a series of.specialty shops. There was ample parking, good lighting, security and standard hours. As the malls became more exciting and efficient, small town main streets began to lose their customers, and many of the most important shops on main street relocated out to the mall. Once that happened, the old main street began to lose its economic vitality, and soon small signs of deter- ioration began to set in. C. Cars and North Reach- Perhaps as significant for North Beach as the changed nature of retailing, was the mass shift in transportation toward personal automobiles. This shift has had a severe impact on North Beach. In the early part of the century, the decline of the railroad which gave rise to the town, and its abandonment in 1935, coupled with the financial devastation of the Great Depression, almost spelled an end to North Beach as a resort community. 51 However, following World War II, the legalization of slot machines and gambling brought a resurgence of tourism to North Beach. Cars now conveyed those on "day trips" who frequented night clubs, taverns and arcades. These tourists returned home in the evenings no longer patronizing those hotels and commercial establishments which catered to extended stays. The completion of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, in 1952, opened the beaches of the Eastern Shore to motorists from the Washington-Baltimore metropolitan area. The development of these shore resorts, in conjunction with the banning of gambling in '1968, drained off the last vestiges of those who had once come to the western shore of the Chesapeake. Finally,- in the 1970's and early 19801s, cars made possible the highly mobile resident population of North Beach. For. many who now live in this Tbwn canrute to oployment, often 30 to 40 minutes away. while in the past, cars have had a direct and adverse impact on North Beach, today, they may hold bright promise for the future. For North Beach's location, only 30 to 40 minutes away from either Baltimore or Washington, makes it an ideal location for many commuters and vacationers in this metropolitan area. As the Bay Bridge becomes more congested; and as North Beach improves, many will increas- ingly chose to live in or to visit North Beach. D. RpyiLali7ation in North R,-acb Over the"past several years, there have been positive changes in North Beach. In the Spring of 1983, the Town voted to close Fourth Street between Dayton and Chesapeake Avenues for youth recreation, opened a community center and passed new ordinances requiring code enforcement and maintenance of buildings in disrepair. Money was also appro- priated for repair of the Town Hall. At the time of the publication of this report, renovation and expansion of the Thwn Hall is almost completed. Future improvements will come from the substantial new grants totalling almost three quarters of a million dollars for water and sewer work which have been recently awarded to the Tbwn. Along with these public improvements have been a series of private investments in the business area. The corner 52 of Seventh and Bay has been, substantially improved by the owners of the antique shop and floral designs businesses. A new Highs convenience store has located on the opposite corner. The owners of the IGA have considered construction of a new store on their existing land. Recent publicity of North Beach in the Raltimorp-Run, the Washington Rost and Money Maga7inp have attractednew potential investors to the area. E. Need for Private Tnypstment Major private investment has been found to be a necessary and integral part of any commercial revitalization program. For the purpose of such a revitalization program is to turn around the overall investment and psychological assumptions about an area. Experience has shown that in order to attract sufficient capital necessary to change the economic level of activity in commercial projects, there must be either adequate existing space suitable for renovation, or the provision-for new financially.attractive development. Experience has further shown that beautification programs alone, that is, facade improvements, public amenities, and street repairs, are in themselves insufficient economic catalysts for commercial revitalization. They must beaccom- panied by a change in the economic level of activity in the area, and by increased retail sales and office leasing in order to accomplish significant and substantial change in declining commercial areas. F. rcial Revitalization I tions The site specific commercial revitalization recommendations which follow are based on the need to attract new, substantial, private investment; to develop the underutilized vacant parcels within the business district; and to create a new commercial image for the area. 53 1. IGA SIM a. Site Identification (1) Location - southwest corner of Bay Avenue and 5th Street. (2) Land Map: Block 3 b. Land Area and OwnerWljp. jQt No. L=d Area ownership Functioj2 (sq. ft) 6 through 15 21,22,23 75,000 Anna Callis Food Store, vacant bldgs, vacant land. C. Description of Tmor ements. The IGA site is covered on the eastern half by a one story structure built in the early 1900s. The northern end of this structure functions as a food market. Constructed in the form of a U, the connecting buildings, which once housed retail and amusement shops are now serving either a warehouse function or are vacant. This structure also once housed the original Uncle Billy's Crab House. d. Zon" The land is zoned MCR - Marine Commercial Recreation District. Under MCR, maximum height is 35 feet, and most residential and commercial uses are permitted. e. Recommendations. There are two possible approaches to dealing with this property which is a central corner in the revitalization of the beach area. They differ in terms of timing and cost. Option 1. In the short term, it is recommended that this property be rehabilitated in a manner consistent with the design considerations of the North Beach Plan, and all vacant and underutilized buildings be opened up for new retail uses. A bathhouse and rest rooms could be located in a new structure behind the present building. The rear lot should be paved for parking, and landscaping should replace 54 lb i@: the current parking uses in the front. The center of the site facing the beach should be considered for placement of amenities which would enhance the properties selling function - such as, benches and trees. 010tion 2. The long term recommendation is for the total redevelopment of this site. As the anchor site in the Mterfront Revitalization Program, substantial redevelopment of this location would have a significant effect on the revitalization of the commercial area. with a lot area of 75,000 square feet, it is possible to construct a new structure on this site including a. one- story food store of 20,000 square feet, 10,000 square feet for ground floor retail and 10,000 square feet for second floor office use. It is recommended that any new structure be designed in a manner which takes maximum advantage of the site, allowing for the major use to be a food store, and providing significant new space for new retail uses, perhaps including a branch bank and a restaurant. Parking should be provided behind the structure. The zoning ordinance requires 400 spaces for such a new structure. With a standard of 200 square feet per parking space plus aisles and entrance/exit drives, 80,000 square feet of total surface space would be required. With the building configuration suggested above, 45,000 square feet could be available for parking. This would take care of about half the required parking spaces. A variance for the full parking requirement would probably be necessary. 56 2. PUEMaC PIM AND IWITRURAW a. Site Idffltificatim (1) Location - on beach at end of 5th Street (2) Land Map: N/A b. Land Area md Ownerahja@ Lot No. LaW Area Ownerahjj@ Function N/A N/A Anna Callis abandoned & closed pier C. Descrir*ion of Improvements An aging wooden pier, located on the beach at the end of 5th Streetr extends approximately 500 feet into the water. Because of its deteriorated condition, the pier has been abandoned, and closed to the public. At one time, a thriving restaurant business was located at the end of the pier. A fire in the 1970s put an end to this use. The pier is in private ownership. d. Zonina. The zoning map does not indicate that the pier is covered by a zoning category. However, the adjacent beach area is zoned MCR - Marine Conmrcial Recreation. e. RecgMWd1LiMg, The pier itself holds the key to the revitalization of the waterfront in North Beach. Because it is so critical, we recommend that the Town of North Beach aoquire the pier and the surrounding beach front property, to allow for full and open public access. The pier should be examined for structural problEns, and an estimate should be made of the cost of repair, versus the cost of a new structure. Should the Town determine that new construction is both feasible and desirable, we recommend that a new pier be build in a manner which would incorporate a variety of uses: strolling, fishing, and dining. The pier should be designed in a manner which allows these three uses to be carried out without conflict. It is suggested that a new restaurant be located at the end of the pier, and that 57 A mmmFN @u A W 304 WWW 47 Fish, Crabs and Oysters served on Open Pier "OSCAR'S" CRAB HOUSE Soft Drinks, Motor Boats, Row Boats, Tackle, Bait @a` M%" LA FIG'URE 19 58 the Town attempt to recoup some of its public expenditures through leasing of this facility. If possible, the Town should seek a tenant who would be willing to provide dining facilities for 12 months of the year. The pier should also be designed to provide an appropriate amount of public dockage for smaller boats. Should the Town determine that repair to the existing structure is possible, it should examine ways to incorporate the same variety of uses into the rehabilitated pier. The history of North Beach documents the location of a dance pavilion at the entrance to the Pier, on the sand beach. Reconstruction of this large building is not recommended because of the need for public open space on the beach. However, the construction of an opm gazebo/pavilion on this site is suggested. 59 3. CRUEPT WnL r a. Site Identificatign (1) Location - on the southwest corner of Bay Avenue and 3rd Street. (2) Land Map : Block 2 b. Jmd Area and ownerahip r.0t SQ.. Land Area._ OwneL.9hip Function (sq ft) 9,10 15,000 ABC Realty Abandoned Corp.(Petrie) C. Description of Improvements A closed and abandoned Calvert Hotel occupies the site. Once a thriving hotel, the Calvert had large porches, gabled peaks, and a widow's walk. The structural condition of the building is unknown. However, from the exterior, the structure seems to be in very poor condition. A portion of the building has been open to the elements for several years, and a small fire has destroyed a portion of the interior. d. zoning, The site is zoned MCR - Marine Commrcial Recreation e. Recorrmendations it is recommended that an architectural and engk-eering analysis of this building be carried out. Because of its historical interest, and past -architectural integrity, it is recommended that rehabilitation be the first option, if this proves to be technically and economically feasible. If, however, the required analyses document a degree of deterioration which is uneconomical to repair, it is recommended that this site be redeveloped as a small inn. Since the site itself is small, the entire site should be used for any new structure, and the developers purchase additional property to provide the required parking. Another option for dealing with the parking requirements is for the developer to work closely with the City in a public/private parking agreement. New construction on the lot across Third Street on the corner of Bay Avenue is also recommended. 60 qP N ILA With an unobstructed view of Chesapeake Bay the CALVERT HOTEL Has come to be the summer home ofmany people rN 4@0 '4 t lie INN; 1 *42 M kj lkrh Pearh, Md. FIGURE 20 61 Development on this lot could be integrated with the Calvert Hotel site, or could be in the form of single or multifamily housing. 62 4. HOTEL/INN SITE a. site Identification (1) Location - southwest corner of Chesapeake Ave and Third Street. (2) Land Map: Block 11. b. Land Area and Ownership Lot No. Land Area Ownership Function (sq. ft) 8,9,10,11 30,000 Irma Gross Abandoned hotel & vacant lot C. Description of Improvements The corner property is a large cleared and vacant area. Lot 11 is the site of the abandoned Twin Beaches Motel, a structure which appears to be in very poor structural condition. d. Zoning The land is zoned MCR - Marine Commercial Recreation. e. Recommendations This property is on a major corner of the commercial area along Chesapeake Avenue. The presence of a large vacant parcel and a rundown abandoned motel at this location is an eyesore and a detriment to revitalization of the commercial area. It is recommended that the abandoned hotel be taken down and that a new small hotel/inn be developed on the site. If possible, the developer should also acquire the adjacent land behind this site so that parking and perhaps a swimming pool could be accommodated. Should a market study not document sufficient demand for a hotel on this site, then new residential construction would be a suitable alter- native. 63 P"' View of Im Site At the Corner of Third Street & Chesapeake Avenue A New Inn Could Look Like This -7 Ian W1 I'm -1 R F, 7777- 77 7771 FIGUR E 21 rid 5. BONELUG ALLEY AND MOM SITE a. Site Identification (1) Location - northwest corner of Bay Avenue and Fifth Street. (2) Land Map: Block 4. b. Land Area and Ownerahjp Lot No. Land Area Qwnershjj@ Function, (sq ft) 29 to 39 41,060 Michael Monias Bowling alley, motel, lounge and parking C. Descrir)tion of Tmorovement,9 Currently occupying the site is a series of one- story structures, including a bowling alley, lounge, motel and a large parking area. While the major buildings thmrselves, with the exception of the motel units, seem structurally sound, their maintenance is extremely poor, and their uses are not the most appropriate for a shorefront location. d. Zon" The land is zoned MCEZ - Marine Ccmmrcial Recreation. e. ReggM=dat i ons There are two possible approaches to dealing with this property which, with the IGA property, is the main focus for commercial revitalization of the beach area. Option I In the short term, the prcperty could be rehabilitated and improved to perform more of a retail function by dividing up the bowling alley space and opening up small retail space fronting on 5th Street as well as Bay Street. Suggested suitable uses might be a small drug store, a corner cafe, and beach rentals. This approach would begin to integrate this corner with the proposed renovated IGA site. Option -2 The long term recommendation and the preferred option is to totally redevelop the property into beach oriented 65 T-M -K -r- 777@1 [3 0 13 a a a S El [100 FIGURE 22 66 retail uses such as a restaurant, ice cream store, bait & tackle store, carry-out food store, bakery, and drug store would be appropriate. If there is sufficient demand, a motel/restaurant would be appropriate. With a lot area of 41,000 square feet, a developer would need to work with the Town in resolving the parking requirements for new development. 67 G. Financing Tncpntiyp_q 1. Rehabilitation. Commercial rehabilitation has been proposed for several structures in the North Beach convercial area. Recent changes in the tax laws have made commercial rehabilitation financially attractive. The reason for the changes, described in the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Report accompanying the Ronnomic RAQnuoru Tax Act Qf 1981 states: "The increased credit for rehabilitation expenditures is intended to help revitalize the economic prospects of older locations and prevent the decay and deterioration cbaracteristic of distressed economic areas." The legislation allows for three categories of tax credits for commercial rehabilitation: 0 For commercial buildings which are over 30 years of age, a credit of 15 percent of the cost of rehabilitation will be granted. A tax credit differs from a tax deduction in that it is subtracted directly from the tax owed. The balance of the cost can be depreciated in 15 years. 0 For commercial buildings which are over 40 years of age, a tax credit of 20 percent of the cost of rehabilitation will be granted. The balance can be depreciated in 15 years. 0 For commercial buildings within an historic district, or for buildings with individual historic designations, 25 percent of the rehabilitation costs can be taken as a tax credit. Taxpryers in this category nay depreciate full rehabilitation costs over a 15 year period. These rules require that each rehabilitation project meet the "substantial rehabilitation" test to qualify for the investment tax credit (M. Under this test, rehabilitation costs must exceed $5FOOO or the taxpayer's adjusted basis in the property, whichever is greater. Lessees with at least a 15-year lease qualify for the ITC. 69 2. New Construction. There are several Federal and State incentive financing programs which are applicable for new development in North Beach. The first is the Federal program of the U.S. Department Of Housing and Urban Development called the Urban Development Action Grant program (UDAG) . The purpose of this program is to encourage new private investment. Currently, $440. million has been authorizedo, and 25% of this amount has been targeted for small conmunities. North Beach became eligible to apply for consideration under this program in October 1983. Communities applying for the first time must request a determination of eligibility from the HEM Area Office at least 60 days before the begintiing of the month in which it plans to submit its full application. This determination will show that the applicant: 0 meets the minimum levels of economic distress, 0 has demonstrated results in providing housing for low and moderate income personss, and 0 has demonstrated results in providing equal opportunity in housing and employment for low and moderate income persons and members of minority groups. Applications to the Action Grant program are made by the local government on behalf of the private investor. This private investor must commit at least 2 1/2 dollars for every public dollar requested. A second incentive program which North Beach may wish to consider is that of the Maryland Industrial Commercial Redevelopment Fund. Like UDAG, the Maryland program is there to provide "gap" funding: that is the difference between the cost of the project and the private financing camiibTents. Unlike UDAG#, MICRF is not a grant to the jurisdiction, but rather a loan for which the applying jurisdiction must pledge its full faith and credit. The interest rates and terms in this program are also very attractive. It is the recommendation of this report, that the Town of North Beach work closely with potential developers and assist them in pursuing appropriate low interest financing in order to stimulate and encourage new developrent in North Beach. 70 CHAPTER VI TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Chapter VI TPANSPCRIATION AND PARKING A. JatLQd1=iM The main function of the street and sidewalk is to provide access to and circulation within the commercial area for both vehicles and pedestrians. Traffic manageoent is one of the keys to a successful revitalization effort. Traffic regulation and circulation requirements for autombiles,, public transits, bicycles and pedestrians must meet the needs of tourists, shopperss, employees of the offices and retail establishments as well as the residents of the area. B. Rxigting Tran-qmrtatinn A=SS According to The Comprehensive Plans, "Prior to phase-out of slot machines in the countyo, weekend traffic often came to a virtual standstill. local business activities and resident trips had to be scheduled around the certain backups that would develop." 15 The reason for these backups was not only the heavy tourist traffic, but also the limited entry points to the Town. Major transportation access to North Beach is limited to Route 261 from the North and the South. There is also a minor access point from 5th Street extended. According to transportation planning projections, approximately 6,900 vehicles were using Route 261 within the corporate limits 15NOrth Beach Planning Commission, rnTnnrPhP-nsiyP Plan for Nnrth 11pach. Maryland, 1974, pg 17. 72 of North Beach in 1975,, and approximately 25,000 vehicles would be using it by 1994.16 Complicating matters for the first time visitor to North Beach is the fact that Route 261 turns sharply right, off Chesapeake Avenue following First Street to Bay Avenue along the beachfront north to the town line. It is fortunate that both Bay Avenue and Chesapeake Avenue are broad streets from First Street to Seventh Street. C. Tj==rtation Recommendations Adequate transportation arterials and access to the beach and commercial areas are important to the successful revitalization of North Beach. Following are the transportation recomnendations (see Figure 23): 1. Route 261 should be re-routed to run along Chesapeake Avenue upon entering North Beach from the south and continue to Seventh Street where it would turn east and then north on Bay Avenue to the town line. Through traffic would then be routed through the commercial area of North Beach and would not mix with traffic destined for beach recreation activities. 2. First Street should be one-way east from Chesapeake Ave to Bay Avenue and Bay Avenue would be one-way north from First Street to Seventh Street. This is the route that beach recreation oriented traffic would use to enter the area. This would allow part of Bay Avenue to be used for the baywalk and would allow roam for angle street parking on the west side of Bay Avenue from First Street to Seventh Street. With these changes Bay Avenue would be very much a beach oriented street. 3. Potential trafiic congestion at the Fifth'Street and Bay Avenue intersection can be minimized by making Fifth Streets, between Chesapeake and Bay Avenuesr one-way westbound. This will also open up this intersection to pedestrians and provide ease of access to the IGA site from the rear. 4. Atlantic Avenue should be made one-way northeast between'Seventh Street and Ninth Street to help alleviate traffic and parking congestion in the area. 16NOrth Beach Planning Commission, Comprehensive fgr North Beach, Ma 1974, pg 19. 73 D. ParRing Situation Parallel parking is permitted on most streets throughout North Beach. Off-street parking areas are currently unpaved and are on private land. The poor condition of the sidewalks and curbs and the lack of designated off-street parking nr,a@m that many cars park on the beach and conwercial property giving the whole waterfront area a very poor appearance. E. Parking Recomiendations Adequate parking is not only needed to serve the needs of customers shopping in North Beach but sufficient parking spaces are also necessary to accommdate recreation visitors. Following are the parking reconmiendations (see Figure 23): 1. Angle on-street parking can be accamnodated along Bay Avenue between First Street and Seventh Street#, assuming that Bay Avenue is made one-way north. It is estimated that approximately 200 on-street parking spaces could be made available. 2. Off-street parking will be included in any new developnent proposals. Efforts should be made to provide public parking behind the IGA building should rehabilitation of the property be chosen as the option. 3. Angle parking should be provided for residents and visitors along Atlantic Avenue between Seventh Street and Ninth Street. 4. Public parking areas should be made available on current vacant parcels in the Tbwn as indicated on Figure 23. The vacant parcels could be purchased or leased by the Town for such use. 74 CHAPTER VII DESIGN AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CHAPTER VII. DESIGN AND PUBLIC IMPROVEKENTS A. one of the best opportunities for visible results, leading to greater conuercial activity, in a revitalization program lies in improvement of the storefronts and in creation of a pleasant pedestrian environment. For these improvements to work to their maximum effectiveness,, they should be carefully designed and closely coordinated. Because some of the buildings have been altered in a variety of ways,, remomlof t:ible' elements and enhancement of existing ones underneath can be an inexpensive and dramatic way of changing the appearance of the commercial area. Over the yearst the quality of the public improvementsy that is# the sidewalkst curbs and gutters, trash cans,, and trees, has suffered serious deterioration. Incompatible patching materials, lack of maintenance in front of storefronts, and inadequate pedestrian amenities have created a sterile and barren appearance in North Beach. Moreover, while the adjacent residential area is often wooded, the commercial district is almost devoid of trees. Any design theme must take into consideration the present routes which vehicles and people use as they move around downtown; the relationship between present and proposed architectural structures; and the colors and textures of the small-scale features such as proposed landscapingp pmnng,, sidewalk materials, street furniture, and graphics which during the day and at night - create the total visual experience in the area. The goal of good design is one of diversity and vitality. The streets should act as a stage for the conrercial activity and should have comfortableo, eye-catching street furniture. 7be shape and scale of the buildings act as a backdrop and should reflect the diversity characteristic of their different periods of construction. 76 For design improvements to succeed, they mist be dejelcped and implemented in a manner which makes shopping not only @ commercial but a social event. Town centerst from time immemorial, have always functioned as the social center of the city. The emphasis,, therefore, must be on creating a pleasant, attractive, and exciting area with a personality of identity of its own. The basic design approach recommended for North Beach is that of conservative rehabilitation. Its underlying principle is simple: to improve the storefront's appearance by minimizing the less attractive features and adding simple, inexpensive elements to emphasize the positive features. Conservative rehabilitation can be as simple as repainting a building periodically to give it a fresh appearance or highlighting architectural details with contrasting colors. In many casest, repainting the trim of the building and removing an unsightly sign or unnecessary earlier remodeling elements can create a whole new image for the building at minimal cost. Addition of fabric awnings, either as shading devices, sign backdropst or simply to supply color and texture to @he store front, can be visually appealing; noticeable as improvements by customerso, and very afford&le for the building's owner. washing the windows and hanging inexpensive shades ?r curtains in the upper floor windows can also give the impression of commercial activity. "lard B. Sf-anr -q& The purpose of design standards is to demonstrate the Town's commitment to an attractive and positive image of the beach and the adjacent commercial areas. The standards are a regulatory device used to ensure compliance by property owners with an overall revitalization effort. Design standards have been found to be a necessary and integral part of any revitalization program. There seem to be three basic principles which apply: 1. Merchants and property owners who get the direct benefits should participate in the management and promotion of the area. 2. Voluntary efforts are difficult to maintain over the long terms and tend to frustrate the more progressive and cooperative merchants and property owners. 77 3. Some type of mandatory provisions which require participation by all are needed to insure rehabilitation. The standards should be developed with several elements in mind: exterior materials, shop windows, doors, lighting, use of color, and type and size of signage. For new construc- tion, another element is added - compatibility with the older, beach-type structures as best demonstrated by the photo of the old Calvert Hotel (Figure 24). It is crucial that the detailing and massing of any new buildings be consistent with the character of the older architecture, as a larger looming scale of new development might easily overpower the town. Enforceability is the key to a successful design standards program. Individual property owners need reassurance that they will not be forced to invest while others neglect their maintenance. AJ Figure 24 Li Calvert Hotel Architectural Features 78 C. PlIbI in TmnrnyPmPn+_-_q It is a widely held belief that conmrcial revitalization and the installation of public improvements are synonymous. This is not necessarily true. For different business districts suf fer f rom different symptoms of decline. In some shopping areasr even before public improvements are implemented there exists a healthy level of economic activity. What is needed is merely a facelif t and a greater unity between the shop, sidewalk, and street. In other shopping areas, such as North Beachr there is a critical need to improve the level of economic activity as well as to create a new perceptual image to consumers throughout the trade area and beyond. In such a situation, it is vital that the merchants undertake a vigorous program of shop improvements, promotions, and special events which establishes the "selling function" of the area, before attention-is shifted from the stores to the streetscapes, and the shops are "overwhelmed by erbance- ment. " There is a necessary and needed balance between increasing the commercial viability of an area and enhancing its appear- ance., Public improvements have a prominent place in a revi- talization program but are only one part of a carplex: strategy. 1. A streetscape includes all the area between the building fronts on one side of the street to the building fronts on the other side. This means the sidewalk, the curbing, the parking meters,, benchesp pavementr trees and grass, trash receptaclest bus shelters and public phone booths, traffic lightso, street lights, and public signage. Simplicity, clarity, and harmony are the keywords of better streetscapes. The basic design of public improvements should serve to highlight the main entrances and intersections of the commercial area, to create distinctive vistas along the main streets, and to provide amenities such as rest areas and green spaces that reduce the harsh-jess of builduV materials and concrete surroundings. The effect of such improvements should be to create a sense of place which encourages cmvmers and tourists to shop, to stroll, and to enjoy the area. In North Beach, the central vista should focus along the Baywalk and the Pier. Care should be taken that appropriate design for the Baywalk is chosen which enhances the Bay view both for strollers and for the homeowners along Bay Avenue. Decorative elements such as benches and lighting fixtures should be chosen which are compatible with the 79 building styles, and which will assist in the development of a unique identity for the Town. Trees should be planted,, if possible, along the Baywalk,' and throughout the commercial area to soften and shade the streetscape for tourist and shoppers, and to break the unsightly line of streetpoles which dominates the skyline. Tb protect the soil and the roots of the trees and to allow air and water to pass through to the soilr iron tree grates should be installed in the sidewalk pavement. The sketch below of the location of the Baywalk shows where a portion of the Walk will have to incorporate a heavy- duty section to accommodate emergency vehicles. ri UIULN Lj --:I -- ETIT@' H P till VAAem6erJG'j ACZ.C-SS Figure 25 Baywalk Location 2. A i rIpwa 1 k-q The existing condition of the public improvements in North Beach range from below average to poor. Sidewalks in the study area are in bad repair and, 80 in some casesr do not exist. Not only does this condition constitute a hazard to pedestriansr but it leads to a poor image of the Townr particularly in those areas illustrated below, where the first impression for tourists will be increas- ingly important. New public improvements should include concrete sidewalks with shade trees, benches,, and decorative streetlights along with trash receptacles and perhaps kiosks for advertising. @ J. 4U A 4.1 r r IV: -::W cA F D' .MR.- Figure 26 Location of Needed Sidewalk Improvements 3. The waterfront park at the end of 5th Street provides an outstanding opportunity to locate a beautiful and functional public facility such as a gazebor which could be used for a variety of a:ctivities: bandstand, shelter, concession or information center. This site, at the foot of 5th Street and at the base of a' restored public pier, could act as a focal point for the Town, offering a striking symbol to all visitors of 81 Existing View on Fifth Street Proposed Public Improvements FIGURE 2.7 82 the revitalization of North Beach. Figure 27 sh%m an existing view along Fifth Street and how it would look with new public improvements and the gazebo. D. ONS 1. The Town should develop design standards for rehabilitation and new development. These sta.rx3ards should be implemented within 6 months of the suhTassion of this report. 2. Establishment of procedures for Town assistance to property owners. This assistance can take several forms: design assistance for individual structures; low-interest loans; construction advice; and tax credit advice. 3. The Town should develop a specific plan for public improvements in the streetscape area, including a selection of lights, benches, trees, and sidewalk material. This plan should indicate appropriate stages of implementation, with cost estimates attached. 83 CHAPTER VIII IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY CHAPTER VIII IMPLEMENTATION SIRATEGY A. TntroductiQD The effectiveness of this North Beach Waterfront Revital- ization Plan depends upon the implementation of the major recommendations in an orderly fashion. The implementation of these recommendations will depend on the support and encouragement of the citizens of North Beach, th6 responsiveness of the business community and property ownersy the commitment of Town officials. For each of these three partners in waterfront revital- ization, the Town, the business and property owners, and the citizens there will be specific responsibilities: � The Town must provide the basic public improve@- ments needed to act as an economic catalyst, attracting and insuring private investment in the waterfront and commercial area. � The business and property owners must make the necessary private investment and begin to provide the expanded range of goods and services the community and visitors will need. � The citizens must begin to patronize the local merchants who are responding to their needs and should support public and private actions which will lead to improved economic activity. 85 B. Rt@aging and Cost of Public Evidence of public commitment to revitalization will be necessary before realistic private investment can take place. Already a number of water and sewer projects are underway in North Beach. Table 4 identifies the necessary public investments, the required funding, the potential sources of funding, the funding status. and the tine frame for implementation. The total public investment required over a 4-5 year period is an estimated $6.4 million. Federal and/or state funding sources have been identified for each item of public investment. C. SLaging and Cnrt- nf Private Tnypstmpni- Five specific sites for private investment have been identified in this plan. Federalr state or local technical and/or financial assistance should be made available to encourage rehabilitation or developrent of appropriate commercial uses on these sites. In fact, the availability of such assistance could mean that private investment could occur earlier than expected. Cost estimates and possible sources of financial assistance are listed in Table 5. With the type and scale of public irrprovements conteRplated in North'Beach it is highly likely that private investment will occur in addition to the five identified sites. If the nature and scale of such private investment supports the North Beach waterfront revitalization goals, consid- eration should be given to technical/ financial assistance for such projects. 86 TABLE 4 COST OF IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC INVESIMENT October 1983 Funding Status of Tj ProjeCt Reauired Source Funding 0 Water System $1,200,000 FMM Pending Applicz o Sewer Plant Expansion 1,900,000 EPA Approved Under State be conq North Beach o New Pumping Station and 250,000 EPA Approved under Sewer Renovation State be coq North Beach 00 o Sewer Renovation 250,000 HUD $155,000 Constr New Jobs Program has been cornple approved o Stormwater Management 1,300,000 HUD Block Grant $500,000 Constr County has been comple approved o.Beach Front Acquisition DNR/POS and Funding 1984 Waterfront parcels (3) 340,000 Chesapeake Bay pending Pier and sand beach 140,000 Acquisition appraisals Funds o Construction of Boat Ramp; 300,000 DNR (Waterway Application Constr Parking Lot; Reopen Small Improvement pending; Marina Funds) $25,000 approved for boat ramp not fiui@ NINt No go, TABLE 4 (cont.) COST OF IMPLEMEMATION PUBLIC INVESTMENr October 1983 Funding Status of Time Frame for -- - --- EiQuirgd Snurce -Funding .-TmnIpmentation � Beach Front Restoration - Bulkheads and Groins 1,000,000 RC&D Application RC&D survey engineering, approved bulkhead design and construction to begin in 1984 - Sand Beach 1,000,000 U.S. Army Corps Authorization Construction projected co of Engineers is needed for 1984/85 co MD Special Appropriation � Construction of Baywalk 500,000 CDBG Program Application 1985 - 1986 needed � Rerouting of Route 261 700,000 MDOT Application 1984 - 1985 to Chesapeake Avenue pending � Parking Area (Acquisition 150,000 CDBG Program Application 1984 - 1987 and Paving) needed � New Curbs, Gutters, 700,000 CDBG Program Application 1985 - 1987 Sidewalks, Street Repairs, needed Underground Utilities - Chesapeake Ave. MDOT Written Construction in 1984 agreement needed TABLE 4 (cont.) COST OF IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC INVESTMENT October 1983 Funding Status of T Proiect Reauired Source Fundina Im � Renovation of Pier 50,000 CDBG Application 1984 needed � Development of Fishing 50,000 DNR Application 1985 Pier needed co Source: Town of North Beach Calvert County Planning Office The Phipps Group TABLE 5 COST OF IMPLEMENTATION PRIVATE INVESTMENT October 1983 Funding Status of Ti Proiect EgQuired Source Funding in � IGA Site $1,500,000 Private Application DECD/MICRF needed DECD/MIDFA UDAG � Construction of a 250,000 Private Application Restaurant on Pier UDAG needed DECD/MICRF � Calvert Hotel Site 650,000 Private Application CDBG needed DECD/MICRF � Hotel/Inn Site 500,000 Private Application UDAG needed DECD/MICRF � Bowling Alley Site 1,200,000 Private Application DECD/MICRF needed DECD/MIDFA UDAG Source: Town of North Beach Calvert County Planning Office The Phipps Group APPENDICES 0 ESTIMATION OF SAND FILL VOLUMES FOR BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT Appendix A Estimation Of Sand Fill Volumes For Beach Nourishment Project. FOR AN ADDITIONAL 100 FEET OF SHORELINE The shoreline most suitable for beach nourisment along North Beach lies between points B and D. Because of differences in the shoreline, this reach has been divided into section B,C and section C,D. For the shoreline extending from point B to point C in Figure 8. Given that: (1) 100 feet of beach between points B and C would 573.5 cubic feet of sand per linear foot of beach. (design height for shoreline is 4 feet and the slope of design beach profile will approximate the existing shoreline profile slope as shown in the design shoreline for points C to D in the accompanying sketch). (2) and, there are 1425 linear feet of shoreline between points B and C. We can determine that: There are approximately 30,270.5 cubic yards of sand neded to complete a beach nourishment project along this length of shoreline. (4) And Using a price of $10/cubic yard for the cost of pumping the sand to the beach from offshore, we can estimate the cost of beach nourishment along this shoreline at $302,705. For the shoreline extending from point C to point D in Figure 8 Given that: (1) 1O0 feet of beach between points C and D.would require 802.5 cubic feet of sand per linear foot of beach (design height for shoreline is 4 feet and the slope of design beach profile will approximate the existing shorline profile slope as shown in the design shoreline for points C to D in the accompanying sketch). (2) and, the are 781.5 linear feet of shoreline between points C and D. We can determine that: A-2 0 (3) There are approximately 23,229.8 cubicyards of sand needed to complete a. beach nourishment project along this length of shoreline. (4) And at $10/cubic yart it will cost $535,003 for pumping the required amount of sand. Therefore: It should cost approximately $535,003 to pump the required amount of sand onto the North Beach shoreline between points B and D to create an additional 100 feet of beach. If the sand must be trucked to the beach site from a source other than an offshore source then the cost of this beach nourishment project will be considerably higher and will have to be recalculated according to the source and its distance from North Beach. It is also important to note that there will be an overfill requirement for a beach fill project such as this, the particular overfill volume (additional amount of sand that must be pumped onto the beach in order to account of the loss of that fraction of the sand material that is too small in diameter to remain on the beach) will vary according to the individual characteristics Of the sand source. A-3 0 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 200 FEET OF SHORELINE For the shoreline extending from point B to C in figure 8. Given that: (1) 200 feet of beach between points B and C would require 1112.5 cubic feet of sand per linear foot of beach. (design height for shoreline is 4 feet and the slope of design beach profile will approximate the existing shoreline profile slope as shown in the design shoreline for points C to D in the accompanying sketch). (2) and, there are 1425 linear feet of shoreline between points B and C. We determine that: (3) There are approximately 58,720.0 cubic yards of sand needed to complete a beach nourishment project along this length of shoreline. (4) And using a price of $10/cubic yard for the cost of puming the sand to the beach from offshore, we can estimate the costs of beach nourishment along this shoreline at $587,200. For the shoreline extending from point C to point D in Figure 8. Given that: (1) 200 feet of beach between points C and D would require 1502.5 cubic feet of sand per linear foot of beach (design height for shoreline is 4 feet and the slope of design beach profile will approximate the existing shoreline profile slope as shown in the design shoreline for points C to D in the accompanying sketch). (2) and, there are 781.5 linear feet of shoreline between points C and D. We can determine that: (3) There are approximately 43,492.5 cubic yards of sand needed to complete a beach nourishment project along this length of shoreline. (4) And at $10/cubic yard it will cost $434,924 for pumping the required amount of sand Thereford: It should cost approximately $1,022,125 to pump the required amount of sand onto the North Beach shoreline between points b A-4 and D to create an additional 200 feet of beach. If the sand must be trucked to the beach site from a source other than an offshore source then the cost of this beach nourishment project will be considerably higher and will have to be recalculated according to the source and its distance from North Peach. It is also important to note that there will be an overfill requirement for a beach fill project such as this, the particular overfill volume (additional amount of sand that must be pumped onto the beach in order to account for the loss of that fraction of the sand material that is too small in diameter to remain on the beach) will vary according to the individual characteristics of the sand source. A-5 TRANSECT_ DESIGN SHORELINE,FOR POINTS C TO D _j W +6- w +5- +41- W +3- +2- 0 LLA 1-- U-S O__ 2 DESIGN 0 3 - BOTTOM -4 -5 6- 20 40 60 00 100 .120 140 160 ISO DISTANCE (FEET) TRANSECT -DESIGN SHORELINE FOR POINTS "B" TO "C" Ill +61- W +s- +4 tjj +3'_ cf) +2- UA MUA 0- z 2- 0 DESIGN7@ -4 - . BOI TOM LU 20 40 60 80 160 120 140 160 ISO DISTANCE (F E ET) APPENDIX B ESTIMATE OF DREDGING VOLUME AND COST Appendix B Estimate of dredging volume and cost. An accurate estimation of dredging volume and costs: for project in North Beach will not be possible until the proposed marina has been sited and the actual location of the boating channel has been chosen. However an attempt will be made to prepare a "ball park." estimate for the purpose of long range planning. It must be understood that the estimate of the dredging project cost presented are only tentative and can not be relayed on for accuracy. Given an average depth of 2.5 feet and a 75 foot wide channel there would be 200 cubic feet of dredge material per linear foot of channel. If the channel were 4500 feet Icing (average distance to the deep water off of North Beach) there would be approximately 33,336 cubic yards of dredge spoil. At $10/cubic foot for dredging costs the project costs would be approximately $333,360. This estimate does not include the costs of spoil disposal which Could range from very little (if the material dredged was suitable for use in the beach nourishment project detailed above)to very high if the dredge material must be trucked to some distant location for proper disposal. B-2 APPENDIX C EVALUATION OF WATERFRONT STRUCTURES Appendix C Evaluation of Waterfront Structures During the summer of 1983 the five primary waterfront structures in North Beach (see Figure 8, Roman numerals I to V) were evaluated for structual condition. Groins In addition, the ten groins along the shoreline were inspected. Only two of the groins inspected were in operational condition. the other eight were non-operational and beyond repair. The two groins that were in operational condition were collecting sand groins, leaving some questions about the dominate direction of littoral drift along this shoreline. Structure I (see Figure 8) Approximately 787 feet of wooden batterpile bulkhead that is in poor structural condition due to rot, apparent marine borer activity in some locations as well as submining due to scouring along some sections. This structure is used as erosion protection for Atlantic Avenue and the houses immediately adjacent to Atlantic Avenue. There is almost continous fishing being done from the bulkhead offering a considerable recreational resource for the vicinity. Work will need to be done in the immediate future if this structure is to remain in place. Currently the state is considering measures for improving protection offered by this structure. Structure II Approximately 280 feet of wooden batterpile bulkhead located along a sand beach. The age of this structure is unknown but the condition is poor due to rot in the batterpiles which support the wooden sheating from falling foward. The structure is used to support a wooden walkway (baywalk) which is fastened to the top of the bulkhead which is the only point of access to many of the houses that face the Bay along this shoreline. This structure may require replacement in the near future unless other measures are taken to improve shore erosion protection for this section of beach. Structure III C-2 Approximately 300 feet of wooden bulkhead that reaches between the pier and the end of Structure II. The condition of this bulkhead can't be adequately determined because the entire structure is covered in sand, however the portions that are exposed appear to be in good condition. The purpose of this bulkhead is apparently for protection of the housing foundations of the adjacent homes(all within 25 to 30 feet of the shore zone) during the major storms. This structure may never require replacement if flood hazard area provisions require the eventual removal of homes from the active shore zone. Structure IV Approximately 782 feet of metal bulkhead (Larssen U-Section) which is of unknown age but is suffering from extensive deteriation and will require replacement or some other alternative erosion protection (i.e. beach fill) in the near future. The bulkhead serves as bank support for Bay Avenue and the houses that are adjacent to Bay Avenue. Additionally this shoreline serves as a recreational fishing area for many residents of the vicinity. Structure V-The Pier A privately owned 500 foot wooden pier of considerable age. Currently the pier is closed to the public however if the necessary repair work were done the pier would be in satisfactory condition for reopening to the public. The deck planking is deteriorated beyond repair and will need replacement. The cross between the pilings will require replacement and the pilings vary considerably in their suitability for reuse. A thorough examination of each pile should be undertaken and its condition with properly sized and treated pilings before a new deck is put in place. If another building is placed at the end of the pier all pilings and cross sills to be used fro its support should be replaced with new properly sized and treated materials. C-3 APPENDIX D LIST OF BUSINESSES IN NORTH BEACH NaM BEACH LIST OF BUSINESSES 1. Al Cole TV 16. Barber Shop 8805 Chesapeake Ave. 9122 Bay Avenue 2. Sand Castle Gift Shop 17. Laundromat 8833 Chesapeake Ave. 9124 Bay Avenue 3. Silver Coast Real Estate 18. High's 8901 Chesapeake Ave. 7th & Bay Avenue 4. North Beach Post Office 19. Westlawn Inn 8903 Chesapeake Ave. 9200 Chesapeake Ave. 5. Gift Shop 20. Jan's Cycles 8909 Chesapeake Ave. 9010 Chesapeake 6. Dry Cleaner Service 21. Freddies Tavern 8909 Chesapeake Ave. 8924 Chesapeake 7. Kenny's Garage 22. Sheads, Hardware 8923 Chesapeake Ave. 8900 Chesapeake Ave. 8. Ceramic ladies 23. Sherberts. Mobil Station 9020 Bay Avenue Comer, Chesapeake Ave. 9. Fresh Air Inc. 24. Beauty Shop 9022 Bay Avenue 8804 Chesapeake Ave. 10. Carlson-Jameson, Inc. 25. Betty Sue's Confection- Art and Design ary Store 9016 Bay Avenue 8802 Chesapeake Ave. .11. IGA Supermarket 26. J.R.Is Lounge 9036 Bay 8800 Chesapeake Ave. 12. Marlo Funiture 27. Pranotions See Us 4100 Third Street Block 15, Lots 2,3 13. Bowling Alley 28. Blackie & Lills 9100 Bay Avenue Restaurant @ Bar 14. B/C Lounge 29. Floral Desi -q . gns 9108 Bay Avenue 7th Street 15.. Nice "N" Fleasy 30. Beauty Shop 9131 Bay Ave. 9201 Annapolis Ave. D-@,12 APPENDIX E RELEVANT NEWSPAPER STORIES Wednesday, June 29,1983 25 cents Per Copy i Rehab @d@ow oviln Han by Laura Tuchm@n % council meeting draws maybe a"aand west to )Wd'_%_hin'gton state. Much to Mayor Buck Gott's dozen @: residents. A recent budget , Beach parks, piers, tot lots, delight, over 50 citizens filled the hearing* brought only two. hotels-the consultants' North Beach town hall. ta,&tTuqsday But last week, lured by the pro-" photographs helped spark ideas for night for the first publid.meeting on mise of better things to. come, bow,North Beach residents want to the community's waterfront citizens filled the town, leaving stan- revitalize their community. "A lot of revitalization study, a $9,500 state- ding room only. Led by the Phipps consultants come in with fireworks funded project to revive the once- Group, a Takoma Park-based con-, and leave you with nothing. We flourishing beach resort. sulting firm, residents, business hope we will inspire you," said Ann "Words cannot express my feel- owners, and town and county of- Breene of the Water-front Center, a ings'at seeing so many people here ficials viewed a slide presentation of Washington-based clearing house tonight," said Gott, looking out over waterfront success stories that stret- for information on urban water- the crowd. On a good night, a town ched from Rhode Island to Georgia See CRONNM, Page A-10 Prince Frederick, Maryland Subscription $10.00 i,n Calvert County, $16.00 Out of County 4 7- J rV- 1:7 1 I tv N g, J n. North Beach Mayor Buck Gott pauses on Atlantic Avenue before returning home. FUro by Laura Tuchmax CrowdContInued from Page' A-1: fronts that has teamed with thi pbasizing that the Chesapeake Bay Phipps Group. is the town's "biggest asset." The North Beach study, funded' "Remember," he s-aid,, "we were by a $10,000 Maryland Department bom and conceived as a resort area. of Natural Res6urces grant, will. That Is. our survival. I can't see survey the town's existing businesses anyone in this room wanting us to and the condition of the shoreline stay as we are or have been for the commerical district, an area that past several years." But, Goff. add- stretches two blocks back from the edt' "I need you as citizens to make Water. The consultants will also my ideas work." study the to wn'for shore manage- Tle Mayor's enthusiasm is p art of ment recommendations and pro- a "new political atmosphere," noted duce a I,ist of redevelopment goals. Dale Tho'nias, a steering committee 'Me consultants asked 'residents member and owner of Nice 'n Fleasy -and business owners to consider. Antique Shop at. Ali and' Bay what they want for North Beach, . Avenue. Ile Mayor has'renewed and what they don't want, bringing Tbomas' hopes that redevelopment 94a new spirit-q sense of hope for "is going to come from within." the future" to their thinking. "Take Residents must now consider a walk around your block and ask, whether they want a family resort or 'Is this worth saving?' suggested ar- a major tourist center, but whatever chitect Alarr Sparbar', another the choice, the Phipps Group member of the Phipps team. "Ask, believes waterfront revitalization 'What would look good?' 'What must draw. people from outside could happen in that areaT Try to areas. 'If your town could survive look at the place with a new pair of serving only the surrounding eye&.1 neighborhood, it. would be doing much better than it is now," Frances' Citizens' ideas -will be' filtered Phipps said.., through the project's steering com- mittee, a six-person team of But the choices are left to the residents, business owners and town tow -n. -"We have no preconceived notions," consultant Hal Phipps planning commission members. Town officials and steering commit- said. I Once the goals are chosen, tee members should "demand that more grant funds and revolving loans can help make them a reality, everyone speak up," said consultant the consultants said. "What this Frances Phipps. "Any town without town needs is to .capture some of a strong opinion is not worth living those dollars that are washing right in," she said. : .. . - through it like mud on a California 'Mayor Gott's ideas include hillside," Frances Phipps said. several@ "possibilities" -a new The steering committee's reports marina, a pier, and concession will be heard at the next waterfront areas--;-all to make North Beach a study meeting on Wednesday, July "family-type resort." "I'm hoping to 6 at 7:30 p.m. in the town hall. The promote and sell this idea from session will also include a discussion Florida to Maine," he said, eim-, of possible waterfront goals. Page A-2, CALVERT COUNTY RECORDER, Friday, Jun* 24,1983 i0orth Beack-Turens Out For W"... aler'front. MeetiLng mercial revitalization is not really nothing can be done." NORTH'BEACH-The town hall lust -up buildings," said one While the consultants were filled M fi e -consultant. "It's , bringing- in.: with, obvious optimism for North d to capacity Tuesday night wi ridents who saw slides of North Beach history and heard plans for people.'! Beach.. it was Mayor Gott and ckno at a. t committee member Dale future development. Consultants a wleAged th ' s eering -A. town revitalization would be Thomas who really rallied the e -meeting also brought together possible without drawing on the crowd. Thomas recounted a visit nWnerous town, county and regional tourist trade, but they implied it. several years ago by the am- officials for a first encounter with would be very difficult to' un off. ,If bassador to Kuwait-a man who was p consultants of the Phipps Group,. a you could survive by serving only eyeing North Beach as a potential T oma Park-based company hired your 0 wn neighborhood it would be investment. t@ - conduct -a waterfront doing better now," said one official. "I always thought if there was revitalization study for No .rth Several questions arose out of the going to be any change in North Beach. attentive audience on just what this Beach it would have to come from The study, to be paid for with a- revitalization would mean for North outside the community," said $9,500 grant from the state Depart- Beach. One man wondered "Is it Thomas, after telling of the am- !nent of Natural Resources, will just the waterfront you're 'talking _ bassadoes tour along the water- inventory the beach area for about or the whole town?" - - front. "But seeing you all tonight possible commercial and residential Consultants stated that they were and with the new political climate, I development. At the' meeting, only studying the waterfront and think we can do it from within." ed a timetable for consultants outlin adjacent business district. Spontaneous applause filled the which will rely Residential areas along'the front old town hall. drafting plans heavil.on citizen involvement. y would also be considered in the Gott had similar words of en- A six-member citizen's steering study, they said, "although this thusiasm. "I think we have one of committee will be responsible for would not necessarily mean a the greatest potentials on the East collecting comments from citizens. change (for the homeowners)." . I Coast," said the mayor. "The town Town folks will be asked what kind The question of money inevitably has the facilities to bring people here of, changes they would like to see in surfaced from the crowd. "How to make money. We were conceived Jbrth Beach. much money are we talking about to as a resort community. I can't see "Assume there is a potential to do all this-$10,000, $10 riiiffion or anyone in this room wanting us to thild your beach back up," said one what?" asked a resident., stay Ias we are.99 of the outside officials at the meeting. "If you can build the beach Mayor Buck Gott then spoke from bBck you will be facing a lot of his dais about money. 4e said there are grants available for various Citizens cigestions. Do you want a boardwalk, projects after the study is corri- j@st a beach, a pier, removal of some pleted, but he acknowledged it would structures or boating (niarina)?" take some looking to find the funds. BeHeard! Town residents at Tuesday's "The money is nowhere as free as Here are th .e committee meeting were given a lot to think in the 70's," spoke the mayor. "Then members and phone numbers about, as consultants presented they said, 'here it is on the table, where they can be reached: slides'showing how other towns *in please come take it.' Now they put it -Dale Thomas, 855-5066 or 257- the United States were renovated behind a door' and you've got ,to find 3044. from ugly, blighted areas to colorful out what door it's behind." - -Wlson Sneade, 257-2963 or 855- communities. Interspers Ied with the Consultants alluded to a kind of 8120. - slides from South Carolina, New domino development theory, where -Vic Scuderi, 257-7894 or 929- England and elsewhere were te HIng some grant money gets the project 9112. shots of the North Beach waterfront U if to say, 'this is possible here.' 9 going and then property owners -Ken Baake, 257-9657 or 855. develop incentive to go from there. 1029. Some of the changes shown in Also, they noted, there is money -Bill Jenkins, 257-2073 or 855- other renovated communties; in- available for town businessmen to 7674. cluded promenades along the shore fix up their property. -Betty Jam .eson, 855-54M. where there was once a failing "Sometimes there is a strong seawall, an open space park that was once an oil tank storage site, community sentiment which says, 'Why should we pay them and colorful buildings that were (businessmen) for having neglected once ugly concrete structures. their buildings for years?... declared Consultants emphasized the need a consultant. "But otherwise there is Our to attract outsiders into town for a no change. If you cannot provide successful revitalization. "Com- incentive (for the businesses) ountu 1535-1214 or 855- 1029 Friday, August 26, 1983 Prince Frederl my r tj 60 Are Unani mous' For Revitalization By Ken Baake revitalization. There were some Managing Editor questions and differing opinions among the 60 people who turned out NORTH BEACH-Th@re were at the town firehall, but in the end blueprint sketches on@ the wall everyori6 indicated agreement on showing what it could look the overall concept. like ... tree-Uned walkways and shops "Let's have a show of hands for next to the IGA store, a wooden those who think we're putting promenade with colorful flags along together something worthwhile," the waterfront, sandy beaches ex- said Mayor Buck Gott at the close of tending several hundred feet out into the two-hour get together. the Bay, a refurbished Calvert Hotel Ali 60 people-even those with with rooms for rent and an enclosed probing questions-raised their family restaurant... hands. All of these drawings came one The revitalization blueprints were ity Wednesday drawn up by consultants who were step closer to rea nigM as consultants, frora the Phipps hired by ths.-towa through a stater Group conducted the third public grant. The gist of the plan, as meeting on North Beach waterfront See'BAYWALK,'Page A-9 Continued from Page A-1 mted Wednesday, involves we're trying to make it prosper,to Hal Phipps. kg more sand to the almost non- said Town Mayor Buck Gott. "We Across from the IGA would be an ent beach and upgrading the were conceived as a resort town and open gazebo which could house nercial center of town in order we will die as a resort town." musical concerts and would include aw money spending tourists. Consultant Francis Phipps got to picnic tables. Small concessions, the heart of the question, stating that such - as those selling swimming A 200-Foot Sand Reach without outsiders to support gear, were suggested. progress, there could be none in The IGA complex itself would beach extension - plan was North Beach. form a vital link in the project. It -nted by consultant Jim Hutto. "It's a nostalgic idea to think a would be used as is, with the open ivolves trucking in sand or s-11 town can support itself," she area between the buildings set up as ,ing it from further out in the said. "It's not possible for this town a courtyard. Small shops could be to build up a new beach - ex- to make any type of changes ... and set up in the part now used for ng out 200 feet. The expanded support goods and services, without grocery store storage. 71 initially would run from First going to a broader community. It's "It's not expensive, but it helps t to Seventh Street. not possible. establish the commercial mood," Ito said the original town beach Councilmember and businessman said Hal Piupps. lust after the mid 1800S when Mike Simkins concurred, noting his s were installed in the Rose gift shop trade relies on people from n area. Those jetties trapped out of town to keep it in the black. New HoteLi in Old Buildings Uie sand that would normally ri,oved south along the coast Recreational Boating Area in Town Additional commercial hence, the town beach was revitalization would center around ed for sand. Business,. too,mould be generated old town hotel buildings which tiat we are proposing. is to by the bigger l*ach, according to two d the groins out and then find Hutto, who Outlined the possiblity of have fallen into disrepair-the Calvert Hotel on the waterfront and material for the be *ach,,, said a small recreational boating area at the old "Tiltin' Hilton," across from "Either trucking it in or the north end of town where people Franchis Restaurant. ing it from the bottom of the could rent and launchsmall vessels. Consultants suggest both buildings The idea would be to establish North be renovated if possible, with rooms t for the beach buildup was Beach as a place people associate ted out for weekend guests and ated at $200,000 to $500,000, with boating recreation. Then, and re' iding on final size and other OWY then, said Hutto, would a full- food served on site. Consultant ;eering factors. Hutto noted wale town marim be possibIg. Francis Phipps, however, cautioned )rojects involving such massive that such "gut rehabilitation" would -inent of sand and water have A Baywalk and the Fifth Street probably be very expensive." and -n successful "up and down the Center that the town would have to be committed to the waterfront project vn resident and former council A second part of the consultant's before any investors would be iwr John Strong protested thi plan involves setting up a walkway willing to undertake the risk. ;Aans as being too ambitious. along the same stretch of water- "It would cost a minimum of $65 uggested the =4oot beach 'hurt, First Street to Seventh Street. per square foot," she noted. "It i detract from the quaint town The walkway, called "The would be very charming to have a iphere by drawing in too many Baywalk," would be lined with restaurant and hotel right there, but iers. and trees and would run you have to ask yourself, 'would an hy 200 feet?" asked Sbvng. primarily along the shoulder of Bay investor come in to town unless you t's too big. The idea is to flood Avenue. are willing to take (necessary) own with out-of-towDem MY In the commerdid center of town, steps-" rty values might skyncket, Third through Fifth streets. the walk lon't think it's a place I want to could be larger, supporting some up my kids." entertainment and boardwalk-type )ng's question on 'how much is commercial shops. tuch' drew some debate, in- The head of the waterfront ig comments from those who project would be at the foot of Fifth utsiders would be needed in Street, across from the IGA-a place to support the town economy. where bathers and sun worshippers is massive, I agree," said town already congregate. Plans call for Ll member Jack Nutter. "But, -purchasing the pier there owned by asn't for revenue sharing (and the'Callis family and refurbishing it. county, state and. federal A restaurant, boat slips and smsill :;) none of us could afford to walkway were ested for the -re." pier. ..".nUally what we're doing is "We're trying to draw Of Uung the town (to out@ that recreational -bnt traffic that i,- said Strong. goes up and down the Bay and no, we're not prostituting it, doesn't gtop here, mid consultant 0.oaywau&, -is t ...Of Beach Plans Continued from Page A-1 Gott Applies for Storm Water Grant for solution. Both men own a lot of property in "We're chasing money from here North Beach and would be in- On e towd'resident wondered how to California and back," the mayor strumental in the development the Project at Fifth Street could said. "Ocean City gets state money project. Glickfield had a comment survive the constant flooding that for maintenance. The State of during the question and answer now occurs there. Consultant Hutto Maryland is willing to help us session. acknowledged that storms will MaIntain it." "How can we get hurt (by the eventuaUy strike any waterfront Town resident Albert "Pop revitalization)?" he asked. "There's structures. "When we build Brown" Glickfield was at the no money here now to pay the meeting along with W.C. Petrie Sr. taxes." recreational facilities they would be built with a reasonable weathering the storm," sat=Huicl.of Mayor Gott interjected. "You're talking ibout the big storms that! Occur every 50 years or so. I think he: (town resident) means the flooding we get every time it rains.11 Gott stated that such day-to-day flooding could be solved by a $% million grant he has'applied for to upgrade town storm water management. "We will have the answer the first week of September (about whether or not North Beach gets the money)," said Gott. Parking and Traffic Another vital part of the water- front plan involves parking and road traffic. Here, the consultants proposed making Bay Avenue one way North bound over to Seventh Street and keeping Chesapeake Avenue two way. Parking spaces would be built along the commercial stretch of Bay Avenue-130 altogether, according to the con- S ultants. Parking also would be set " UP behind the IGA 'Some parking would be set aside, too, for town residents whose homes are in the waterfront area. Some people questioned whether or not the town would get enough tourism dollars to support maw-, tenance of the new projects. Once hi gh again he cited grants as the hoped. NOVEMBER 1983 $2.50 Retreats That Pay Their Way Chosen carefully, they're appreciating assets,income producers-and tax shelters with a view. Look for real buys in resort areas that are on their way to becoming popular. Jim and Barbara Wallace Jim Wallace, a retired Air Force lieuten- bought their Chesapeake Bay ant colonel, and his wife Bobbie, an au- bungalow in North Beach, thor of children's books, bought a Md. for a modest $45,000 three-bedroom waterfront bungalow for because both it and the onetime gambling just $45,000 last October in North Beach, resort had seen better days. The Wallaces Md. The down-at-the-heels former gam- spent $11,000 on refurbishin, and now bling mecca, 45 minutes from Washing- North Beach is enjoying it's own revival. ton. D.C. on the state's run-down western shore of Chesapeake Bay, is in the midst of a revival. The Wallaces spent $11,000 on a fence, a front porch and an oak floor but enjoy doing much of the other ren- ovation work themselves. Page A-4, CALVERT COUNTY REC uo*24,IM 41F 40't jar ta t Water. nt Survey. The Recorder is assisting North Beach civic leaders and the town Waterfront Revitalization Steering Committee come up with q list of citizen goals for restoration of the town waterfront and commercial area. (See, editoes column on this page) - We ask each town resident to fill out this survey and mail it to the newspaper-Calvert County Recorder, Box F. Prince Frederick, Md. 20678. .Please include your name and address on the survey, so we can be sure who lives in town and who doesn't. We welcome commen s from non-residents, but would like to know which comm are from residents and which ones are from outsiders. Prior to the July meeting between the steering committee and town consultants we will collect all the forms and turn the information over to the committee. We will then publish theresults of the survey (without names and addresses) in the paper. Here's the survey. Please indicate whether you like the idea, don't like it or have no opinion. Do you want to seesand brought In to build up a bigger beach in town? Yes No Not Sure Where? 2) Would you like to see an open park for picnics and festivals along the waterfront? Yes -,No- Not Sure Where? fto 3) Would you rather see a large boardwalk with amusements and shops or a smaller promenade, just for strolling and sightseeing? Boardwalk Promenade Both-, Neither Not Sure 4) Would you like to see the town purchase Uncle Billy's _Pier in front of the IGA for public use?, "'Ves , No Not Sure What use? 5) Would you like to see more restaurants along,the waterfront? Yes Where? 6) Would you like to see outdoor festivals held along the waterfront? Yes Where? 7) Should North Beach try to draw tourists into town? Yes No Not 9kie- 8) Should the town try to buy some wa properties for commercial use? Yes No Not Sure Which ones? 9) Should. waterfront commercial buildings be renovated,, torn down or left alone? Renovated -,, Tom Down Ieft Alone -, Not Sure Which buildings? - 10) Should Main Street commercial buildings (such as those across from the town hall) be renovated, torn down, or leftalone? Renovated L-, Tom Down Left Alone , Not Sure 11) Is additional parking needed along the waterfront and Main Street? Yes 9 No Not Sure 12) Would you agree to having some town tax money used for the waterfront revitalization program? Yes No Not Sure Page A-4, CALVERT COUNTY RECORDER, Friday, July 8, 1993 Survey Results In an effort to assist the North Beach Waterfront Revitalization Steering Committee come up with a list of citizen goals for restoration of the town waterfront, the Recorder conducted a survey two weeks ago. The I survey results were presented to the steering com- mittee and other civic leaders at a meeting Wednesday I night. As promised, we will list the results in the paper, now. Overall, we are pleased with the number of, respondents. A total of 14 people took the. time to fill out the 12-questi6n. survey and mail it back. First, we should point out that nine of the responses came from people who live in town, while three came from people who live outside municipal limits. Two respondents did not identify themselves at all. Most people who answered the survey elaborated on the 'yes-no' response by penciling in comments. Several actually typed out responses on separate sheets of paper. Based on these responses, it appears as if North Beach residents and neighbors are ready for a change. On all of the questions dealing with suggested im- provements, people answered 'yes' much more than they did 'no,' indicating a favorable, response to the proposed waterfront revitalization program. Here's a breakdown by question: 1)Our first question asked if people wanted to see sand brought in to build up a bigger beach. This question drew a unanimous 'yes' response-all 14 wanted a bigger beach. 2) Do people want an open park for picnics and festivals along the water? Yes, by an 11 to two margin, with one inot sure.' 3) Would people prefer a large boardwalk with amusements and shops or a smaller promenade for walking? This question yielded perhaps the most in- teresting results, with eight favoring the promenade and three, the boardwalk. Three said 'both.' By a slight margin, then, it appears people would like to keep the waterfront development scaled down somewhat, and not overly-commercialized. 4) Should the town purchase Uncle Billy's Pier? Everyone said'yes.' U's unanimous. 5) Do people want more restaurants on the waterfront? A majority, 13, said'yes.1 6) Should the town hold outdoor festivals along the waterfront? 'Yes,' said 11 respondents. 7) Should North Beach try to draw tourists 'into town? By a majority of nine, people feel -tourists are necessary. Only one said 'no,' while three indicated they were-'not sure.' 8) Should the town buy'some waterfront property for commercial use? Ag iin, a majority said 'yes,' with only three 'not'sdres.1 No one said'nol to this question. 9) Should waterfront commercial buildings be renovated, torn down or left alone? This question and the one which followed it drew a mixed bag of responses. Six people favored tearing down the waterfront commercial buildings, while two said 'renovated.' Five respondents said it would depend on the condition of the individual buildings-some should go and some should stay. One person was not sure. 10) Should Main Street commercial buildings be renovated, torn down or left alone? In this case, the majority felt at least some of the Main Street (Chesapeake Ave.) buildings could be saved. No one wanted them all torn down, while five said 'renovated.' Eight people indicated both, depending on the condition of the individual buildings. 11) Is additional parking needed on the waterfront? Ten people said 'yes,' while only two said 'no.' Two others were 'not sure.' 12) Would you argee to having some town tax money used for the waterfront revitalization program? Ap- parently, so, as people seem willing to put their money behind their thoughts.Ten people said'yes.' C,aluert Lf auntg Ir APPENDIX F 1920'S PROMOTIONAL BROCHURE FOR NORTH BEACH Out of your office into your car-away to North Beach No other resort has so much worth while to offer you Good, wholesome pastry, at reasonable prices North Beach, MD., is an incorpor- EWALD'S BEACH BAKERY NORTH BEACH ated town, governed by a mayor and Bread, Rolls, Pies, Cakes, Milk, Etc. MARYLAND council, capable business men, who have the interest of the community at heart. We have a summer cottage waiting for you Having outgrown its old quarters, the FITZGERALD REALTY CO. The most delightful mayor and council have begun the construc- Real Estate, Loans, Insurance, Contracting Summer Resort tion of a new town hall, which will not only on Chesapeake Bay be adequate for present needs but will take The first and last chance to get home cooking into account future growth. KELLNER'S DELICATESSEN Facts and Information Police and other local officers necessary to Chicken, Fish, Crab and Steak Dinners Dealing with conditions as they conduct a well-regulated summer resort exer- are right now, not as it is eise constant vigilance in their departments. Bathing Accessories, Beach Pajamaa, Shoes, Etc. expected they will be An efficient volunteer fire department, SELINGER'S NOVELTY SHOP at some future time provided with the lastest equipment and We sell at city prices. 3rd & Chesa. Ave. fords ample protection from fire. North Beach, Md., A grade school provides educational ad- If it's electrical-I do it. Phone North Beach 44 is 25 years ahead vantages for the children. B.G. LOVELESS of its competitors There is an abundance of electricity for Electrical Contractor, North Beach, Md. power and light constantly available. The North Beach Telephone Exchange For Low Prices, Service and Quality buy at the makes such communication easy, prompt and SANITARY GROCERY very satisfactory. Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Groceries and Meats The shore line of North Beach is protected by a concrete sea wall and jetties. Oil Gas Accessories There are miles of conrete sidewalks. The NORTH BEACH SERVICE STATION A Real Health and Pleasure Resort streets are lighted by electricity and many Battery Charging and Rentals Towing of them are paved. Streets are numbered and alphabetically The House of Courteous Service named for the convenience of visitors. ROBT. S. MEAD & BRO. North Beach enjoyes a continuous building Paints, Roofing, Cement, Building Material, Etc. program. It has outgrown its original en- vironments and is extending its frontiers in every direction. By good state roads or railroad-one hour from city "Vacation Days" will be happy days at North Beach Work in the city-play at the beach-sleep in comfort Buy where your comfort and investment are assured "Good times" in summer are memories all the winter There are approximately 1,500 houses in For a Good Meal or Refreshments The devotees of Izaac Walton will find and about North Beach, representing a vast Go to CRABTREE'S BAKERY AND LUNCH many specimens of the finny tribe waiting outlay of money. The summer population at Fresh Baked Goods Rooms to Rent to strike their bait. Trout, hardhead, rock times reaches probably 12,000. Truly, here spot, and bluefish are the more common va- is a very interesting city in the making. The only Drug Store in North Beach rieties. Crabbing also provides pleasant di- Its proximity to Washington and Balti- BAILEY'S DRUG STORE version. In the fall oystering and duck and more, its accessibility by steam railroad, bus, Sanitary Soda Fountain, Drugs and Sundries rabbit shooting lure the sportsman. state roads and water, and the natural charm North Beach is abundantly supplied with of the place, put it in a class by itself. All modern improvements and conveniences original forest trees--something not many The State has recently completed a half- THE ALTA HOTEL resorts can boast. Not only do these trees million-dollar concrete highway thus shorten- Fish, Chicken, Fresh Vegetables. Reasonable supply the shade which is so comforting and ing the distance to North Beach. necessary to your enjoyment, but they pro- There are hotels, boarding houses, cafe- Compliments of vide an artistic setting for the attractive terias ect., ample to please the most exacting M.E. SWING COFFEE CO. cottages and bungalows, and are a haven for appetites, and at reasonable prices. Featuring Mesco and Town Club Finest Coffees the beautiful wild birds. This booklet issponsoredby the recently For those who enjoy the forest and delight organized Chamber of Commerce. As will Chicken and Fish Dinners, $1.25 T-bone Steaks to walk along its cloistered avenues there is be seen from the number of business cards KAY'S CAFE no more alluring spot. co-operation among these live-wire merchants. The drinking water--and this is impor- In this connection it shouldbe said,in con- Fish, Crabs and Oysters served on Open Pier tant--is supplied from artesian wells. This trast with most resorts, one does not have "to "OSCAR'S" CRAB HOUSE water contains sulphur, iron and magnesium ed it is the aim of these merchants to stock Soft Drinks, Motor Boats, Row Boats, Tackle, Bait in quantities sufficient to make it highly bene- about everything at has been found to be ficial as a beverage. Physicians recommend merchandise in other resorts will appreciate New Store---New Stock---Reasonable Prices this water, and it is sent daily to Washington that this is a very important feature. HAYES' CENTRAL GROCERY and nearby cities. Southern Maryland is noted for its charm Fresh Vegetables, Fruits, Groceries, Etc. In fact a resume of the advantages of this of countryside, its colonial homes, its corn favored resort would not be complete did Bay, Many enjoyable automobile trips can Bowl for Health Reduce the Waistline we not call attention to the fact that North be taken over good state roads, and if you OPEN-AIR BOWLING ALLEYS Beach is a health resort as well as a pleasure want to hike there are plenty of places to go. S.H. Keyser, Mgr. 5th St. opposite Midway resort. Surrounding North Beach is a rich farming Salt air, sunshine, a coat of tan--and health for you "Nation-Wide Service Groceries Chain" country, and an abundance of fresh vege- RUSSELL'S MARKET tables, milk, butter, honey, chickens, etc., can Meats, Groceries, Vegetables. Bathing Suits. be purchased at reasonable prices. Wash- ington milk is also delivered daily. Oystering and duck shooting provide fall relaxation Whether its an automobile trip through the country-- A "vacation home" assures your children health Outdoor sports--fishing, crabbing, boating, bathing Compliments of the It has been said* by those familiar with AMBASSADOR LAUNDRY coast resorts that nowhere is there a more In the Interest of a Greater North Beach favored spot for bathing. A sand beach of the cleanest white sand extendes for nearly a Enjoy an invigorating swim in the Bay mile. There are no springs, holes or trach- NORTH BEACH BATH HOUSES erous undercurrent to alarm you, and the Bathing Suits -- Showers-- Private Lockers varying depths make it peculiarly adaptable to all ages and to every degree of skill in Sparkling artesian water bubbling with health swimmers. WARD'S ARTESIAN WELLS One might say that North Beach perhaps Wells Drilled Quickly at Remarkably Low Cost appeals especilly to those with growing fami- lies. It has been ofter referred to as "the Plumbling and Heating. Any make Pump installed children's paradise", because there is nothing WILLARD S. WARD that can bring them to harm. In 25 years from accident in water or woods. Wood -- Coal -- Ice There is a Catholic and a Union Church. MERRILL C. WARD These minister to the spiritual requirements Daily Deliveries in Any Needed Quantity of the community. A ferry line to connect our beaches with With an unobstructed view of Chesapeake Bay the the Eastern Shore is now assured. The reali- CALVERT HOTEL zation of this longfelt need will mark another Has come to be the summer home of many people great stride in our progress. Finally, as you will observe, North Beach Radio Bingo on the Midway. is already a town--not a speculative hazard. FRANK NELSON All we ask: Investigate North Beach. Come in, enjoy yourself, win a valuable prize W.M. & A. MOTOR LINES, Inc. The Bailey Block--modern apartments and stores North Beach Passenger and Freight Lines DR. G.D.P.BAILEY Freight Term'l 710 7th St. S.W. Phone NA 0213 Lots-New Cottages and Bungalows-Easy Terms On the Bay Front opposite Temple of Mirth North Beach Park--the delightful new subdivision SINCLAIR'S SANDWICH SHOP AGENT ON PROPERTY Soft Drinks, Ice Cream, Light Lunch, Cigars, Etc. or a moonlight canoe ride--you'll enjoy every minute Further information-- N.B. Chamber of Commerce 6668 1_4108 7850