[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
FY 1992 FINAL PRODUCT Task 9 Permit Compliance & Inspection Virginia Marine Resources Commission Permit Compliance and Inspection Program VIRGINIA C Final Report CZM Grant NA27OZO312-01 Task 9 December 1993 This report was funded, in part, by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality A\ Coastal Resources Management Program through Grant #NA2'70Z0312-01 of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended." Introduction The Virginia Marine Resources Commission ("Commission" or 11VMRC11), as provided in Chapter 12 of Title 28.2 of the Code of Virginia, is the State agency responsible for issuing permits for encroachments in, on, or over State-owned submerged lands throughout the Commonwealth. The Commission has possessed this regulatory authority since 1962, and currently processes approximately 2,000 applications, and issues nearly 500 permits annually. Virginia is only one of six "low water states" and maintains ownership of all submerged lands channelward of the mean low water mark in tidal waters, and regulatory authority channelward of the ordinary high water mark on most naturally occurring nontidal perennial streams. In addition to managing the Commonwealth's 1,472,000 acres of submerged lands, the Commission also regulates the use or development of tidal wetlands and coastal primary sand dunes pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 13 and 14 of Title 28.2 of the Code of Virginia. Local governments are provided the option to adopt and locally administer a model ordinance. Thirty-five localities have elected to do so. VMRC maintains original jurisdiction in the remaining eleven "Tidewater" localities which have not adopted the model wetlands and dunes ordinances. Even if locally adopted and implemented, the Commission retains certain oversight responsibilities and reviews all decisions made by those local wetlands boards. The regulatory activities conducted by the Commission and the 35 local wetlands boards are integral core components of Virginia's approved Coastal Zone Management Program. The permit review processes used by the Commission and these local wetlands boards ensures that necessary economic development is permitted in a manner which minimizes adverse impacts to the valuable natural resources within our coastal zone. Permit compliance is a mandatory component of any effective regulatory program. As such, it is essential that the terms and conditions contained in the permit documents be followed if, the full benefits of any regulatory program are to be realized. Without such permit compliance, the regulatory process breaks down and serves only to increase bureaucracy. In order to evaluate compliance with permits issued by VMRC and local Wetlands boards a survey, funded in part by CRMP grant #NA90AA-H-CZ96, was conducted in 1991 (Exhibit A). The compliance survey was designed to investigate and gauge the effectiveness of the various compliance monitoring programs A i__7 currently utilized by VMRC and local wetlands boards. The survey was intended to both identify existing compliance shortcomings and to ascertain effective compliance monitoring techniques in order to develop concise recommendations to enhance compliance monitoring programs. The purpose of the grant project was to implement the recommendations of the 1991 Permit Compliance and Inspection Program report and institute a standardized permit compliance program for permits issued by the Commission in the Coastal Zone, I and assess permit compliance for projects authorized in 1990 and 1991. The latter was designed as a follow up to the compliance inspections conducted during the 1991 study for projects permitted in 1989. This document is intended to serve as the final report for Task 9 of Grant No. NA270ZO312-1 and provides an overview of the steps taken, to initiate the compliance monitoring program and a review of the compliance data gathered during the grant year. Permit Comiliance Program In the December 1991 Habitat Management Division - Special Report (Exhibit A), five recommendations were made for VMRC to enhance permit compliance efforts. 1. Require detailed drawings for all projects requiring a VMRC permit. 2. Require accurate benchmarks or reference points on the plan view drawing (s) . 3. Require Engineers to take an adequate number of slides during the initial site visit to illustrate pre-construction conditions. 4. Require Engineers to conduct post-construction inspections at all sites permitted by VMRC. 5. Incorporate the data collected from the post-construction inspections into the Habitat Management Divisions existing computer data base. These recommendations were incorporated into the Commissions compliance monitoring program through several mechanisms. The Joint Permit Application (Exhibit B) was amended to reflect the need for more detailed drawings with accurate benchmarks. New conditions were incorporated into Commission permits requiring that a permit placard (Exhibit C) be posted at the project site and procedures were established for the Commission to receive notice when project construction is started. The latter was accomplished through the use of a self-addressed stamped card (Exhibit D) which is returned to the Commission, by the permittee. special conditions related to permit compliance have been added to all permits issued by VMRC. Examples of these can be found in the attached sample permit (Exhibit E). In addition, an interim compliance data base was established to track compliance monitoring efforts and results. While this data base -LS currently separate from the Habitat Management Division's permit tracking system, the Division has contracted with the Virginia Institute of Marine Science to update and modify our computerized permit tracking system. The new system will enable US to incorporate compliance data into each permit file. The initial software for this change has been delivered to VMRC and it is anticipated that the new system will be available for use in mid-1994. 2 Furthermore, procedures have currently been established within the Habitat Management Division to require that the Division's Environmental Engineers inspect all permitted projects. These procedures require that photos be taken of the site both before and after construction, and that the final inspection be documented through use of a Project Compliance Assessment Report (Exhibit F). Permit Compliance SurveVs In addition to implementing the above recommendations, a representative sample of new data from those projects which were permitted in 1990 and 1991 was added to the 1989 data . This was designed to provide up to date information for continued comparison of the compliance checks. one hundred and fifty projects were randomly selected from applications processed for permits in 1990 and 1991. Applications not involving a permit, or involving a private pier, or subaqueous dredging were excluded. This resulted in 131 applications being selected for 1990 and 136 for 1991. These figures were determined to be adequate to represent compliance rates for all permits issued during a given year. Because permit activity in a given area or locality over a particular year is variable, no effort was made to ensure that all localities were represented. Instead, it was anticipated that the random sample would result in a sample group which more accurately reflected the average permit activity per locality. Table (1) indicates the number of projects reviewed in each locality. Thirty-three Tidewater localities are represented over the three year period. Two hundred and fifty-seven of the projects required wetland permits, sixty subaqueous permits, and sixty-nine required both jurisdictional permits. This represents a review of a total of three hundred and eighty-seven permits. Follow-up site inspections were made of all the selected projects to determine the degree of compliance. Results of the compliance inspections were grouped into the same five categories as the 1989 sample: 1. Project not constructed 2. Unable to determine compliance 3. In compliance with the permit document 4. Moderately in compliance - (the average additional encroachment did not exceed 6 inches greater than the permitted alignment, and had length and square foot measurements which were no more than 10% greater than that authorized. 5. Out of compliance - (the average additional encroachment exceeded 6 inches and the measurements were greater than 10% authorized.) 3 Table I Number and jurisdictional type of project selected for the cornpliance survey in each locality. Locality Rural/Urban project Project Type Year 899091 Accomack Rural 15 115 5S,21W,5B Charles City Rural 02 1 IS,IW,IB Chesapeake Urban 45 3 2S, I OW,OB Chesterfield Rural 01 0 OS,OW, I B Essex Rural 14 3 4S,2W,IB Fairfax Urban I1 1 IS,2W,OB Gloucester Rural 36 8 IS,12W,4B Hampton Urban 53 8 5s'llw,OB Hanover Rural 01 0 IS,OW,OB Isle of Wight Rural 00 2 2S,OW,OB James City Urban 33 1 OS,7W,OB King and Queen Rural 10 3 IS,2W,IB King George Rural 12 2 2S,3W,OB King William Rural II I OS,IW,2B Lancaster Rural 915 9 3S,26W,4B Mathews Rural 33 9 OS,IOW,5B Middlesex Rural 87 10 3S,17W,5B New Kent Rural 01 0 IS,OW,OB Newport News Urban 04 5 3S,4W,2B Norfolk Urban 88 7 5S,15W,3B Northampton Rural 13 1 lS,4W,OB Northumberland Rural 19 14 9 IS,37W,3B Poquoson Urban 12 4 IS,6W,OB Portsmouth Urban 00 5 IS,2W,IB Prince William Uj-ban I1 0 OS,IW,IB Richmond Co Rural 01 3 2S,OW,2W Stafford Urban 34 3 2S,4W,5B Suffolk Rural 10 1 OS,IW,IB Surry Rural 00 1 IS,OW,OB Virginia Beach Urban 20 22 15 8S,38W,13B West Point Rural 00 1 IS,OW,OB Westmoreland RuW 75 14 IS,4W,3B York Urban 41 2 IS,5W,lB Totals 33 Localities 21 Rural 120 Projects 60 Sub. (89) S=Subaqucous 12 Urban 131 Projects (90) 257 Wet. W=Wetlands B =Both Subaqeous and Wetlands 136 ProjccLs (91) 69 Both 4 The results of the sampling have been summarized and may be found in Table 2- As with the 1989 study, the results were subdivided into rural and urban areas, in an attempt to evaluate any demographic differences in compliance levels. Rural areas were defined as those areas possessing population densities of less than 140 per square mile; while urban localities were defined as having population densities greater than 140 per square mile (1980 census). This breakdown was the same for the 1991 grant study and for purposes of consistency was maintained. Table 2 Percentages of constructed projects categorized by their level of compliance. 1989 1990 1991 Total Urban Rural TOW Urban Rural Total Urban Rural # of Projects Reviewed 120 so 70 131 54 77 136 54 82 % of Projects Reviewed 42% 58% 41% 59% 40% 60% # of Projects 98 43 55 109 45 64 113 40 73 Constructed % of Projects Reviewed 82% 86% 79% 83% 83% 83% 83% 74% 89% # in Compliance so 26 24 51 26 25 54 19 35 % of Projects 51% 60% 44% 47% 58% 39% 48% 48% 48% Constructed # in Moderate 14 6 9 21 10 11 23 14 9 Compliance % of Projects 14% 14% 14% 19% 22% 17% 20% 35% 12% Constructed # Out of Compliance 8 2 6 4 1 3 7 0 7 % of Projects 8% 5% 11% 4% 2% 5% 6% 0% 10% Constructed # Compliance 26 9 17 33 8 25 29 7 22 Indetermin ble % of Projects 27% 21% 31% 30% 18% 39% 26% 18% 30% Constructed For the most part the same trends observed in the 1989 study are reflected in the figures for 1990 and 1991. Since these figures represent projects that were permitted prior- to th'-- publication of the recommendations from the 1991'study, it is not unexpected that there should be little change. However, it is encouraging to see that there were no projects out of compliance in urban areas for 1991. In addition to the inspections conducted on projects permitted in 1990 and 1991, inspections were also performed on projects permitted by VMRC during the grant year following implementation of the standardized compliance program described above. To date 36 projects have been inspected and of those, 64% have been found to be in compliance. Only one project was found to be out of compliance and five projects were within the moderate compliance category. Figure 1 depicts the number of permits checked, in the latest effort, and a breakdown of the number of projects constructed and their degree of compliance- 5 VMRC Permit Compliance Inspections 36 35 40 ..... ...... ... .......... .. . ............... ..... ....... .... .. ........ .... ....... ... 30 23 - ------ ------- - 20 ------------ - -- - - ------ - ------ - ------- 5 6 10 0 0 0, 0 0 C, 0 C'X X % 111:@> 00 00 Figure 1 Conclusion At this point, the implementation of a standardized compliance monitoring program for projects permitted by VMRC appears relatively successful. It may be too early, however, to see if any substantial changes will need to be made to improve the program which remains funded for the next grant year. on a positive note the Habitat Management Division has purchased a boat with general funds to inspect dredging projects for which compliance could not previously be monitored. For projects permitted by local wetlands boards, it appears more compliance data will need to be gathered before we can finalize recommendations that would direct our efforts towards specific areas or project types. on the other hand, it does appear that. certain urban localities have developed adequate procedures, or have provided sufficient staff resources to ensure compliance with their permits. Furthermore, even if a local government had incorporated the 1991 report recommendations in their entirety into their procedures, it is likely that any results would just now begin to be seen. As a result, continued monitoring for compliance of local wetlands board permits appears necessary, and a standardized compliance monitoring program for wetland permits may need to be initiated. A T i EXHIBIT A ................ ......... ........ . ............ . . .. ......... VIRGINIA'-, % tool ;ONO m: Permit Compliance and Inspection Progra Findings and Guidance Document Robert C. Neildrk USURODUCnON minimizes adverse impacts to the valuable natural re- sources within our coastal zone. Permit compliance is a mandatory component of any The Virginia Marine Resources Commission effective regulatory program. As such, it isessential that ("the Commission" or "VMRC"), in conformance the terms and conditions contained in those permit docu- with Section 62.1-3 of the Code of Virginia, is the ments be followed if we are to realize the full benefits of state age ncy responsible for issuing permits for en- the regulatory program. Without such permit compli- croachments in, on, or over State-owned submerged ance, the regulatory process breaks down and serves lands throughout the Commonwealth. The Com- only to increase bureaucracy. .mission has possessed this regulatory authority . In July 1990, Senate Bill 183 became law (Ch. 881 since 1962. We currently process over 2,000 appli- Acts of Assembly 1990). This legislation provided the cations and issue nearly 500 permits annually. Vir- Commission and local wetlands boards with the author- ginia is a "low water state" and assumes jurisdiction ity to issue restoration orders and assess civil charges for of submerged lands channelward of the mean low violations of the applicable subaqueous, wetlands and water mark in tidal waters, and has regulatory sand dune statutes. An ability to accurately determine authority channelward of the ordinary high water and monitor compliance with permit requirements is es.- mark on raost naturally occurring nontidal peren- sential if the agency and wetlands boards are to effec- nial streams. tively carry out the intent of this legislation. In addition to managing the Commonwealth's Unfortunately, Commission staff does not currently submerged lands, the Commission also regulates have a standardized procedure for monitoring permit certain activities in tidal wetlands and coastal pri- compliance. Instead, the staff engineer assigned respon- mary sand dunes pursuant to Chapters 2.1 and 2.2 sibility for a particular locality will attempt to inspect of Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia. Local govern- projects which are under construction or have been re- ments have the option to adopt and administer the cently completed. Quite often such compliance inspec- ordinance. VMRC asserts original jurisdiction in tions are in response to the receipt of an inquiry or those Tidewater localities which have not assumed complaint. Additionally, the Commission's marine law local regulation through the adoption of the model enforcement personnel are often aware of permitted pro- wetlands and dunes ordinances. Even where lo- jects in their localities and occasionally make site inspec- cally adopted and implemented, the Commission re- tions during the performance of their daily duties. In , tains oversight responsibilities for all decisions either case, however, only a small percentage of the pro- made by those local wetlands boards. jects permitted by VMRC are routinely inspected for The regulatory activities conducted by the Com- compliance. mission and the 34 local wetlands boards are inte- Permits issued by wetlands boards are also not al- gral core components of Virginia's approved ways carefully reviewed for compliance upon project Coastal Zone Management Program. The permit re- completion. Independent studies conducted by Brad- view processes used by the Commission and these shaw (1990), Hershner et al. (1985) and a survey con- local wetlands boards ensures that necessary eco- ducted in conjunction with this project indicate that the nomic development is permitted in a manner which extent of permit compliance monitoring by local wet- lands boards varies between localities. 'Mat effort. This report was funded, in part, by the Virginia Council on the Environment's Coastal Resources Management Program through F grant #NA90AA-H-CZ796 oftheNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended. Figure 1. Tidewater Virginia Categories. 1, 2 and 3 were fairly straightforward and easy to assess. The distinction between those projects considered to be in moderate compliance or out of com- pliance was more difficult to make and became some- Urban what subjective. As a rule, however, those projects considered to be moderately in compliance possessed an Rural average additional encroachment which did not exceed 6 YAS- inches greater than the permitted alignment, and had length and square foot measurements which were no more than 10% greater than that authorized. Those pro- jects. exceeding either of the above thresholds.were con- sidered to be out of compliance. As previously mentioned dredging projects were not included in the survey. These projects were excluded be- cause we believed that it would be difficult to distin- between man-made and natural post-dredging deviations in depth contours. However, recommenda- tions to monitor compliance for dredging projects are in- cluded in the Recommendations section of this P" document. 8-h ch-"-. Results The results of the survey are summarized in Table 2. You Will note that the survey results were subdivided overall effectiveness of permit compliance within into rural and urban categories. This was done in an ef- the coastal zone, no effort was made to ensure that fort to ascertain if there were any demographic differ- all localities were represented in the survey. In-. ences in compliance levels. For the purpose of this stead, it was anticipated that the random sample study, rural localities were defined as those having popu- would result in a sample group which more accu- lation densities of less than 140 per square mile; urban rately reflected the average permit activity per local- localities were defined as having population densities ity. Therefore, the number of projects reviewed in greater than 140 per square mile. The figures for popula- each locality varies according to the observed per-, tion density were obtained from the 1980 census by the mit activity in 1989. U. S. Department of Commerce (Univ. of Vir * ' Twenty-three (23) of the 49 Tidewater localities ginia, were represented in the sample group. Figure 1 and 1987). This breakdown was also patterned after that used by Bradshaw (1990) in her compliance monitoring Table 1 illustrate the Tidewater region and indicate study. the number of projects reviewed in each locality. In addition to providing the raw numbers for the pro- Eighty-one (81) of the selected projects required jects determined to be in a particular category, Table 2 only a wetlands permit, 13 required only a subaque- also provides the percentage of constructed rojectg ous permit and 26 impacted both jurisdictions and p required subaqueous as well as wetlands p .ermits. which were categorized by their level of compliance. Site inspections were made of all the 120 se- These percentages are particularly interesting when evaluating the results. Especially noteworthy are the per- lected projects to determine the degree of compli- cc.ntages of projects in which compliance could not be ance. Results of the compliance inspections were determined. Figure 2 further illustrates this information. grouped into five categories: 1. Project not constructed 2. Unable to determine compliance 3. In compliance with the permit document 4. Moderately in compliance with the permit document. S. Out of compliance with the permit document 3 Figure 3. able. Compliance determinations are made more diffi- Projects categorized by level of compliance. Va. Beach cult when the person inspecting the constructed project and Norfolk factored indenpendently. was not present during the initial site visit and is there- fore unfamiliar with preconstruction. conditions. With- out the aid of precise benchmarks or other means to Percemage pinpoint the alignment of a project, compliance determi- 100 ETwf VRAM nations are difficult at best and frequently impossible. 0 L*b- t-va&m) As expected, the projects in localities that require so - - - - - - - - more detailed application drawings and information ex- ove"An hibited a higher percentage of determinable compliance. This is illustrated in Figure 3. Compliance could be de- so - - - termined at 91% of the sites inspected in Virginia Beach and Norfolk. Both of these localities require detailed pen-nit drawings with identifiable benchmarks. Both 40 - - - -- - - - - - - - - also regularly conduct post-co'nstruction compliance in- spections. Additionally, Virginia Beach requires profes- sionally engineered project drawings and further 20 requires the permittees to post performance bonds. 10 11 Those bonds are not released until post-construction in- spections have determined.'that projects are indeed in 0i - 0 compliance with the permit granted by the Board. Moderate out Of Indeterminable In Compliance -Compliance Compliance Compliance Not only was compliance usually determinable at the Virginia Beach and Norfolk projects, but the level of compliance was generally higher as well. Ibis is most Discussion likely attributed to the regular post-construction inspec- tions. Ninety (90) percent of the projects where compli- A cursory review of the survey results is at first ance could be determined in Virginia Beach and Norfolk very discouraging. Of all the constructed projects were determined to be in compliance and 10% were in reviewed, only 51% were determined to be in com- moderate compliance. None of the inspected sites were pliance. It is important to note, however, that com- determined to be out of compliance. By comparison, pliance could not be determined for one reason or 1.5% of the sites visited in other localities, were catego- another at 27% of the sites visited. The fact that rized as out of compliance, where compliance could be compliance could not be determined does not auto- determined. matically mean that the projects were not built in Prior to conducting the study, it was anticipated that conformance with the intent of the permit docu- there would be a marked difference in compliance levels ment. between urban and rural localities. Initially this ap- In fact, it is more encouragingto note that the peared to be the case. Once Virginia Beach and Norfolk vast majority of the sites visited. even where compli- were factored independently from the other urban locali- ance could not be determined, appeared to have ties, however, the data revealed very little difference in been constructed along reasonable alignments and compliance levels between urban and rural localities. It appears that the programs being implemented by were often the proper length or width or both. This Virginia Beach and Norfolk are effective in ensuring .per- seems to indicatea general intent to comply with mit compliance. As a result, the recommendations for permit requirements. This opinion is further sup- improving compliance draw heavily on the examples ported by the fact that, of all those projects where provided by these localities. compliance could be determined, 89% were deter- mined to be in either,total or moderate compliance. The primary problem identified during the sur- vey was the inability to precisely determine compli- SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ance at 27% of the sites.vis,ited. Many of the permits did not have adequate drawings or bench- The increasing importance of effective compliance marks to ensure compliance.' Additionally, many monitoring cannot be overstated. Recent legislative changes which authorize VMRC and wetland boards to permits contained ambiguous conditions such as, liapproximately" or "as close P the bank as possi- issue restoration orders and assess civil charges for viola- ble", which are by their nature virtually unenforce- tions of wetlands, dunes, and subaqueous statutes neces- 31 sitate compliance programs which can accurately 5 to the one developed by VMRC. This form may be provide an additional mechanism for ascertaining when found as Attachment 2. The worksheet will help to the permitted construction has been completed, since the ensure that all the necessary information is gathered permittee will typically call for a compliance inspection during the inspection and will provide a quick refer- soon thereafter in order to have his bond released. ence in the event questions regarding the project Whether or not the board develops a performance bond arise later. Additionally, the worksheet information policy for all projects, performance bonds should be con- should be provided to VMRC for incorporation into sidered as a valuable tool to ensure compliance on pro- the compliance data base. The data base will pro-, jects of special concern. vide a valuable source of information on compli- ance and the overall effectiveness of individual Recommendations VMRC Should Consider to En- wetlands boards. hance Compliance Efforts 5. Utilize only enforceable permit conditions Virginia state agencies are also currently operating and avoid nebulous statements such as, "approxi-. within strict fiscal constraints. In addition, all agencies mately" and "as close to the bank as possible." continue to explore ways to streamline the permitting instead, the board should negotiate a specific maxi- -process. As a result@ it is especially important that any mum encroachment, length, or amount of impacts new compliance enhancement policies not result in addi- shouldmodifications become necessary to satisfy tional burdens on VMRC's financial resources nor result any concerns. If modifications or revisions are in unnecessary additional requirements imposed on the agreed to during the public hearing, revised draw- applicant. The following recommendations are made ings which accurately reflect the modification, in- with this in mind and are typically policy and procedural cluding revised benchmark distances, should be type changes rather than an imposition of new require- required prior to permit issuance. ments on the applicant. Many of the recommendations for VMRC are similar to those noted for wetlands 6. Develop a wetland board placard to be boards. posted by the permittee at all permitted project sites during construction. The placard can serve 1. Require detailed drawings for all projects re- to aid inspectors and concerned citizens when a pro- quiring a VMRC permit. Staff engineers should utilize ject is under construction and problems or questions the drawings checklist found in the Joint Permit Applica- arise. The placard would provide the name and per- tion in their initial review of each application to deter- mit number, making identification and inspection of mine completeness. Areas where insufficient data was the project easier. If the locality already requires provided should be conveyed to.the applicant with the building permits for all wetland projects, they may acknowledgement letter. Incomplete applications should wish to avoid duplication and just add the wetland not be processed. If adherence to this policy fails to pro- permit number to the placard for easy identifica- vide the anticipated results, the Commission may wish to tion. A sample placard that was developed for consider Adopting a regulation that requires profession- VMRC is provided as Attachment 3. ally engineered drawings be submitted on all commer- cial projects, or for projects exceeding a certain 7. Performance bonds can be utilized to pro- threshold of impact or value. In the event an engineer vide a financial incentive to comply with wet- can clearly determine from the available information that lands permits. Some boards currently require all a VMRC permit will not be required, additional informa- permittees to post a performance b *ond. That bond tion to satisfy this policy would not be necessary. is not released until a post-construction inspection has determined that the p roj ect was constructed in 2. Accurate benchmarks or reference points conformance with the permit document. Some should be required on the plan view drawing(s) of all boards may determine that bonds are not appropri- projects requiring VMRC authorization. Accurate ate for all projects due to low permit activity or the distances from the benchmark to each end, and angle of fact that additional man-hours are required to proc- the structure or impacted area should be mandatory. ess the bonds. These distances should be routinely checked during the Bonds are a compliance mechanism that are al- initial site visit. If benchmarks are impractical. for a cer- ready provided for in the wetlands law. They are tain project, it may be necessary to have the applicant routinely used effectively by a few boards to ensure stake the impacted area. If staking is utilized, the engi- compliance. The bonds are typically set high neer should take an adequate number of slides to accu- enough to provide sufficient funds to undertake res- rately document the proposed alignment. This may well toration in the event of noncompliance. Bonds also be the case for dredging proposals. 7 Attachment 1 Int 9 lot U IM 23 Lot 12 Ce Site Map Vidnity.Map 7 Rehan, VAR Lot 10 Alma RL i9l :25' 3r 57 Lot 11 V 37 5 39, Lot 12 177' -XItV Datum: MLW Plan View County of. Northurnberland Adjacent Property Owners 1. Lot 10, C.B. Parks Sheet. 1 of 1 2. Lot 12, M.E. Lank John G. Doe Date: Au ust 3 1991 P.O. Box 123 9 Tidewat-er, Va 22222 9 Attachment 3 Permit @.:VIRGINIA Opp ;000 COD Y N. C Commonwealth of Virginia Marine Resources Commission Authorization A Permit has been issued to: (Name) (Address) The Permit Authorizes: Issuance Date Expiration Date (Commissioner or Designee) (Notary Public) (Commission Expires) This Notice Must Be Conspicuously Displayed At Site Offork I I EXHIBIT B Local, State, Federal Joint Permit Application Filling Isolated Intake and Outfall Wetlands Structures IL Stream Alteration Filling Nontidal Wetlands Structures and/or fills in lakes Underwater I impoundments rossings (Ponds,Lakes) nams, Road Levees, Weirs Crossings Some forms of mechanized land clearing in any wetland Aerial Crossings Man-made Canals Filling below MHW or in wetlands - 4-4 A Shoreline Stabilization (Bulkheads, Riprap) Beach Nourishment Groins, Jetties Published jointly by the: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District Virginia Dept of Environmental Quality Virginia Marine Resources Commission Local Wetlands Boards PREFACE This guide is designed to assist you in applying for permits from Local, State, and Federal regulatory agencies for work in waters and/or wetlands within the Commonwealth of Virginia. The intent of the guide is to provide general information on the permit process, not a complete legal and technical reference. Answers to technical questions and detailed information about specific aspects of the various permit programs may be obtained from any of the Federal and State regulatory offices or the advisory agencies listed in the agency directory. THE JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS Complete one application to applyfor nuiltiple agency permits - A single Joint Permit Application is used by the regulatory agencies. This means only one application needs to be completed for most local, state, and federal agency permits. However, some health departments and local agencies do not use this application. You should contact them for information regarding their requirements. Even though one application has been filed, separate permits are often required from the regulatory agencies involved in the permit program. Before you begin work. make sure you have received authorizations or waivers from each agency. Send completed application to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. 'Mey will assign a processing number and forward copies to the Corps of Engineers, Department of Environmental Quality, local wetlands board, and various other State agencies, as appropriate. If you have any questions about the need for a permit, the permitting process, or completing the joint permit application, contact the Corps of Engineers for a pre-application site Visit. Corps staff can often help you minimize adverse impacts or eliminate the need for a Corps permit altogether. ORGANIZATION OF THE JOWTAPPLICA TION The basic application, appendices, and various acknowledgement forms are located in the front of the booklet. The general information section which contains a regulatory and resource agency directory, information on penalties, processing procedures,definitions and special terms, and the most frequently asked questions is located in the back of the booklet. If you are submitting this -application as a Pre-Discharge Notification (PDN) under the the Corps Nationwide permit program, 33 CFR 330 (Appendix A, Part C), you must clearly enti y it by writing the letters PDN at the top of the first@ page of the basic application. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ...................................................................... I Basic Application Form .......................................................... 3 Appendices with Sample Drawings Appendix A Private Piers & Marginal Wharves ......................... 9 Appendix B Boathouses ........................................ 11 Appendix C Marinas & Community Piers ........................... . 13 Appendix D Dolphins-Mooring Piles-Buoys Not Associated w/Piers .......... 15 Appendix E Boat Ramps ....................................... 17 Appendix F Bulkheads & Associated Backfill. ......................... 19 Appendix G Fill .................. 21 Appendix H Riprap & Associated Backfill ............................ 23 Appendix I Marsh Toe Stabilization ................................ 25 Appendix J Dredging/Mining/Excavating ............................ 27 Appendix K Groins & Jetties ..................................... 29 Appendix L Breakwaters ....................................... 31 Appendix M Beach Nourishment .................................. 33 Appendix N Intake - Outfall Structures .............................. 35 Appendix 0 Stream Channel Modifications ........................... 37 Appendix P Impoundments/Dams ................................. 39 Appendix Q Utility Crossings .................................... 41 Appendix R Road Crossings (Bridges-Tunnels-Culverts) .................. 43 Certification of Authorization (Designates Agent to Act on Your Behalf) ......................... 45 Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement Form ...................................... 47 Applicant's and Contractor's Acknowledgement Form .................................... 49 Regulatory & Advisory Agencies ................................................... 51 Information on Federal Wetlands Determinations ........................................ 55 Federal Penalties, Related State Codes, Privacy Act Information .............................. 57 Processing Procedures ......................... ................................ 58 Most Frequently Asked Questions .................................................. 59 Definitions, Special Terms, & Abbreviations ........................................... 60 Certificate of Compliance with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regional Permit RP- 17 for the construction of open pile piers for private use ........................................ 63 Addendum: Department of Environmental Quality Additional Requirements ....................... Al -2- BASIC APPUCATION FORM JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ACTIVITIES IN WATERS AND WETLANDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL ANSWERS: If a question does not apply to your project please print NIA (not applicable) in the block or space provided, If additional space is needed, attach extra 8-112 " x I I " sheets ofpaper. Ifyou are unsure of a particular tern4 please refer to the definitions section. Ia. Applicant's name and complete address: Mr., Mrs., Ms. (circle one) Telephone numbers: Home (A/C_) Work (A/C_) 1 b. Property Owner's name and complete address: Telephone numbers: (if different from above) Home (A/C____) Work (A/C____) 2. Authorized agent's name Telephone numbers: and complete address (if applicable): Home (A/C_) Work (A/C_) 3. Have you obtained a contractor for the project? -Yes -No If your answer is "yes" complete the remainder of this question and submit the Applicant's and Contractor's Acknowledgement Form on page 47 with your application. Contractor's name and complete address: Telephone numbers: Home (A/C_) Work (A/C 4. List the name, address, and telephone number of the newspaper having general circulation in the area of the project. Failure to complete this question may delay Local and State processing. Name and complete address: Telephone number: (A/C---) NAO FM 1065, Rev 30 APR 93/VMRC 30-300 Rev 30 APR 93 _3- 5. Please give the name of the waterbody at the project site, the county or city the project is located in, and directions to the site: a tributary to located in County/City Give descriptive directions to the project site from the nearest intersection of two state roads within that county or city and visible points of reference: IF THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN AN UNDEVELOPED SUBDIVISION OR PROPERTY, CLEARLY STAKE AND IDENTIFY PROPERTY LINES AND LOCATION OF PROPOSAL. A SUPPLEMENTAL MAP THAT SHOWS HOW THE PROPERTY IS TO BE DIVIDED SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED 6. State the project purpose and provide a brief description of the project: 7. Please place a checkmark next to as many of the following that describe your project site: Tidal waters 100 year floodplain Natural Tidal wetlands Lake or Pond Man-made Nontidal waters Mudflats Unknown Nontidal wetlands River Vegetated Shallows Other (explain - e.g. Intermittent stream, vernal pool, etc.) 8. Proposed use (check one): Private Community Commercial Industrial Government Other (explain): -4- 9. Will the project impact (flood, drain, excavate, dredge, fill, shade, etc.) wetlands ? - Yes No Uncertain If your answer is "YES", please indicate: A. vegetated wetlands area(s) to be impacted? tidal square feet nontidal square feet B. nonvegetated tidal wetlands area(s) to be impacted? square feet 10. Will the project be located at the site of any historic property? (Note: historic properties include but are not limited to archeological sites, Civil War earthworks, graveyards, buildings, bridges, canals, etc.) Yes No If "Yes", please provide a map showing the location. 11. Have you previously contacted the Department of Historic Resources concerning this project? Yes No If "Yes", please provide the following information: a. VDHR file number: b. Response date: c. Type of response (no effect/no adverse effect, additional information requested, survey requested, further consultation needed): 12. Is your project located within a historic district? Yes No Uncertain If "Yes", please indicate which district: 13. Has a survey to locate archeological sites and/or historic structures been carried out on the property? Yes No If "Yes", please provide the following information: a. Date of survey: b. Name of firm: c. Is there a report on file with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources? d. Was any historic property located? 14. Have you previously had a site visit, applied to, or obtained a permit from any agency (Federal, State, or Local) for any portion of the project described in this application or any other project at the site? Yes No If your answer is "Yes", provide the following information: Name of Representative: Agency Activity Application Numb Action I&Qa Jcheck the appropriate boxJ Issued Denied Withdrawn Site Visit Date Action taken -5- 15. a) Has any work commenced or has any portion of the project for which you are seeking a permit been completed? -Yes -No b) Are you submitting this application at the direction of any state, local or federal agency? _ Yes - No If your answer to either question above is "YES", give details below stating when the work was completed, who performed the work, and which agency (if any) directed you to submit the application. (Please clearly differentiate on your application drawings that portion of the work which has been completed from that which is prop9sed.) 16. Approximately how long will it take to complete the project after all required permits have been issued? months 17. Approximate cost of the entire project (materials, labor, etc): $ Approximate cost of only that portion of the project which affects State Waters (below mean low water in tidal areas or ordinary high water in nontidal areas): $ 18. List the name and complete mailing address of each adjacent property owner to the project. 19. List the name and complete mailing address of each waterfront property owner across the waterway from the project, if the water body is less than 500 feet wide. Also, if the project is within a cove, list the name and address of each property owner located on the cove. 20. All affected property owners must be notified of the proposed plans. If you do this yourself, it will assist us in processing your application. Have you discussed this project with all affected parties and had them sign an Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgement Form? - Yes - No If your answer is yes, the acknowledgement forms must be included with this application. -6- 21. Check the appendices below which apply to your project. NOTE: The applicable appendices must be completed and submitted as part of your application. Additional appendices can be provided upon request. If you are proposing multiple activities, you may submit one plan view drawing provided all the required information for each activity is included (e.g. if your proposal includes a pier, boathouse and dredging, you may show all activities on a single plan view drawing). A sample drawing for each activity is located on the back of the corresponding appendix. Although the sample drawings are condensed so that the plan view, cross section, end view, and vicinity maps are all on one page, you do not have to limit your drawings to one page. Drawings submitted need not be prepared by a professional draftsman as in these samples. LIST OF APPENDICES AppendixA Private Piers & Marginal Wharves Appendix B Boathouses Appendix C Marinas & Commercial Piers Appendix D Dolphins-Mooring Piles-Buoys Not Associated w/Piers Appendix E Boat Ramps Appendix F Bulkheads & Associated Backfill Appendix G Fill Appendix H Riprap & Associated Backfill Appendix I Marsh Toe Stabilization Appendix J Dredging/Mining/Excavating Appendix K Groins & Jetties Appendix L Breakwaters Appendix M Beach Nourishment Appendix N Intake - Outfall Structures Appendix 0 Stream Channel Modifications Appendix P Impoundments/Dams Appendix Q Utility Crossings Appendix R Road Crossings (Bridges-Tunnels-Culverts) Addendum Department of Environmental Quality Additional Requirements ALL APPLICANTS MUST SIGN I hereby apply for all necessary permits for the activities I have described herein. I agree to allow the duly authorized representatives of any regulatory or advisory agency to enter upon the premises of the project site at reasonable times to inspect and photograph site conditions. I hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE APPLICANT'S NAME (PRINTEDfIYPED) DATE REMINDER: BE SURE TO COMPLETE THE APPENDICES YOU CHECKED ABOVE AND SUBMIT WITH THE BASIC APPLICATION FORM (PAGES 3-7). MAIL ALL INFORMATION TO: Virginia Marine Resources Commission Habitat Management Division P. 0. Box 756 Newport News, Virginia 23607 -7- APPENDIX A -- PRIVATE PIERS AND MARGINAL WHARVES PLEASE CONIPLEM THE CHECKIJST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. 11-IE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN TBE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR TIIEY WUJL BE RETURNED AS INCONIPLEM Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners (if in a cove or the waterway is less than 500 feet wide, also show the location of the property owner across from the site) - distance the proposed structure will be located from the adjoining property lines width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) - ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) location and distance from existing channels (marked and/or unmarked) soundings taken at mean low water (tidal) or at full pool level (nontidal) at 10-foot intervals channelward encroachment (including mooring piles) relative to mean high and mean low water lines dimensions of pier and all LJT-head section, platform, or deck distance between the structure and mooring piles Side View Drawing existing contours of the bottom and marsh peat surface mean high and mean low water levels (tidal areas) ordinary high water level (nontidal areas) height of pier over existing bottom or marsh peat surface Vicinity Map 'Me name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). 1 . Number of vessels to be moored at the pier: 2. Provide the registration number of vessel(s): registration type of vessel registration - type of vessel registration - type of vessel 3. Give type (e.g. sail, power, skiff, etc.) and size of vessel(s) to be moored at the pier: type length width -----draft -type length width -----draft -type length width draft -9- APPENDIX A, Private Piers & Marginal Wharves Lot 4 Existing Pier N Both Oaks Route 1, Box 200 Perryville, Virginia 22121 W Vegetation A0 Mooring p ;D 20' 75 W > 0 2: 16 CY W M 39' CY 0 cr 96' 0 ...... CL 481 !-0- A 7(Y Fro-W; Line on Lot 6 Miles D. Fixer 401 Doyle Lane Locustville, Virginia 29306 .... ...... *6 60' tat gth 2x8 docking on w 48'from)A4W- 2x8 stringers with .......... each side MLW 2x8 gurter Of Pilo. +5.0' %.,+2.5'MHW +O.O'MLW IT 8"-10" Diameter Piles. Length as required Materials: 1. All pll" and lumber to be oak treated. 2. AD nails, bolts and Hardware to be galvanized. Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed private pier prolemet Cross Sectional in Painter Crook at Martin Bay @ c 4 1. Both Oaks View County Of West 2. Miles D. Fixer Evans Pier Project Applicant J. J. Evans Scale 1' 40' Sheet 1 of Date 1/29/92 -10- APPENDIX B --BOATUOkJSES PLEASE CONIPLETE THE CI-IECKLIST AND ANSWER T11E QUESTIONS. TIHE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR TIIEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures - benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners (if in a cove or the waterway is less than 500 feet wide, also show the location of the property owner across from the site) - width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) - ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nonfidal) location and distance from existing channels channelward encroachment (including mooring piles) relative to mean high and mean low water lines dimensions of the boathouse, catwalks, or other structures distance between the structure and mooringpiles soundings taken at mean low water (tidal) or at ordinary high water (nontidal) at 10-foot intervals End View Drawing mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) dimensions of the proposed boathouse height above mean high and mean low water level material to be used for construction Vicinity Map T'he name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Give type (e.g. sail, poweir, skiff, etc.) and size of vessel(s) to be moored at the boathouse: -type -Jength ------width -draft type ength width draft type length ____Lwidth draft 2. Will the sides of the boathouse be enclosed? Yes No 3. Provide the registration number of vessel(s): registration type of vessel registration type of vessel registration type of vessel APPENDIX B, Boathouses 1. J. Smith 1200 South Road Yorktown, VA @d 102' C Lu 1 LU 108. 1 d: 47 C-) uj 0 114' .0 CC I W 0 IFY10102 EIRE 0 1111111111111111111111 a. 125- Proposed Exisiting Pier Boatho Applicants residence N J. Kimidy 1201 South Road Yorktown, VA 1 -1 -1 -2 -3 -4 .4 -4 dept 'at MLW) 700' widtkof erway Lot 10 ........... 121 C. Barton 2. 1202 South Road .......... own. VA XX, .. ..... ... .............. Side View End View residence Asphaft Shingle ........... x::` Open Proposed Ex ... g Pier Boathouse aid 41 8@ Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed Boathouse Cross Sectional in Poore Creek at Isellvillo 1. J. G. Smith View County of W9st 2. C. E. Barton J.Kimidy Boathouse Applicant J. Klmidy Scale 1" = 40' Shoot 1 Of Date 1/29/92 -12- APPENDIX C --MARINAS AND COMMUNITY PIERS PLEASE CON11PLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. TIIE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location'Of adjacent property owners (if in a cove or the waterway is less than 500 feet wide, also show the location of the property owner across from the site) width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) location and distance from existing channels channelward encroachment (including mooring piles) relative to mean high and mean low water lines length, width and other pertinent dimensions of the structures distance between the structures and mooring piles soundings taken at mean low water (tidal) or at ordinary high water (nontidal) at 10-foot intervals proposed structures for collection and handling of haza dous material (include settling tanks for collection of travel lift washdown water, paint chips, etc.) location of gasoline storage tanks Cross Section Drawing dimensions of covered structures including roof height above mean high and mean low water level material to be used for construction existing contours of the bottom mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) height above mean high/mean low/ordinary high water line height of structure(s) over the bottom or marsh peat surface Vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Have you obtained the State Health Department's approval for sanitary facilities? Yes -No (You are required to obtain this approval or a variance before a VMRC permit can be issued.) 2. Will petroleum products or other hazardous materials be stored or handled at the facility? Yes No If your answer is yes, please include your spill contingency plan 3. Will the facility be equipped to offload sewage from boats? - Yes - No 4. Indicate the number and type of slips: Wet Slips DryT-torage Existing Proposed THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -13- Overall width of waterway Is 1800' at Pier 2 and 600' from the pier 'T" to the channel. lood tu -6.0 Shapiro Crook Ebb-0- Bulkhead Reference Points Measured to .5 Center of Piling from annotated Bench Mark (BM) Tree. A to (BM) A = 92' (BM) B = 73' B to (BM) 8 = 72' (BM) C = 110' OF C to (BM) B = I 10, (BM) C 70' LINEL- Pier 3 -1B W ler 2 Propo 290' Bu Pier 1 ..... ...... Vqqetated Bu Strip 1U ead 30P x 30' and Backli .... Concrete A x Storage 0 Travel Litt S 0 Tanks Sh"jol-re, 0 Pad z I I ....... W 30 -j @eo T1 C 0. 2 cc 0 BM *C* Tree ........... 40 061 T 0 ...... .... io .......... Porous Tree Bathhouse Surface 0 Parking ... GOO f Boat Yard 0 and 0 Maintenance Are S9 roe 41 C b: (Porous Surface) a)- - we BM r- > cc cc Dredged Material Kree 2 Boat Ramp Parkin Disposal Area 0900 ro 9 if 9 r APPENDIX D -- DOLPHINS OR MOORINGS (not associated with piers) PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN UM FOLLOWING INFORNUTION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCONIPLETE: Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners (if in a cove or the waterway is less than 500 feet wide, also show the location of the property owner across from the site) - width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) - ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) type of mooring (buoy, pile, dolphin) anchoring device and weight - latitude and longitude of mooring location and distance from existing channels total swing radius Cross Section Drawing type of mooring length of chain and line used weight and type of anchor material to be used for construction existing contours of the bottom mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) Vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Give the number of vessels to be moored: 2. Give type (e.g. sail, power, skiff, etc.) and size of vessel(s) to be moored: - type length width draft _____jype -length width draft 3. Name(s) and complete address(es) of the owner(s) of the vessel(s) if other than applicant: 4. Registration/documentation number(s) of the vessel(s): 5. Do you plan to reach the mooring from your own upland property? Yes No if "No", explain the proposed means of access: -15- APPENDIX D, Dolphins or Moorings '10 .7 N @4\ 00 Je Ile 00, Proposed Mooring 00, .001 Swing radius 87 Latftude 38057'484 Latitude - .9 '00 Longitude 74017'18' 38057'48- 41@1 .00 Plan View -6 C eAA Proposed - VA 6S, Mooring 400' .2 N inity Map 4000, -4 10 ket rorn U.S.C.& G.S. rt 8191 (19 "t;e 71) 2. R. A. Brien All ........... ........... .......... .2 E. Graham Box 19 Ine A alls. ot, IF TCE! Norfolk, VA 1. T. B. Pr in 46121 ..... ........ scale: I*= 10' .... ...... Latitude 3805"r488 Longitude 74017'18" ............ ........... Swing radius 12+24+24+27= 1/20 dimeter pennant (24 feat long) 0 27'boat a y with horizonalband 0 0 MLW I" diameter heavy chain (galvanized) 12 feet long) 1/4* diameter steel cable 24 feet long) ExIstins bottom- .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . ...... ...... ................................ ..... . Adjacent Property Owners Proposed Mooring Proposed Mooring In 1. E. Graham Allen Grimes Chief* Bay at Cotnolr, VA 2. R. A. Brien 1121 Bark Road 3. T. B. Pruitt Richmond, Virginia County of West Sheet 1 of 1 Oat* 3-20-93 Applicant: Allen Grim*$ -16- APPENDIX E -- BOAT RAMPS PLEASE CONTLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER UIE QUESTIONS. TI]EDRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN TTIE FOLLOWING INFORNIATION OR TI]EY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLE1F_- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) dimensions of ramp location and distance from existing channels channelward encroachment relative to mean high and mean low water lines Cross Section Drawing material to be used for construction existing contours of the bank and surface mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) Vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). 1 . Will any excavation be required to construct the boat ramp? - Yes No If yes, explain how and where you plan on disposing of the excavated material: 2. What type of design and materials will be used (e.g. open pile design with salt treated lumber or concrete slab on gravel bedding, etc.)? 3. Please give the location of the nearest public boatramp: 4. Will any other structures be installed concurrent with the boatramp installation (e.g. tending pier, groin, etc.)? _ Yes _ No If "Yes", please include the appropriate appendices. 5. Will any portion of the project be placed on wetlands? Yes No If your answer is yes, indicate the square footage and type of area(s@ to be impacted: Tidal Nontidal Yegetated wetlands sf - sf -Non-vegetated wetlands sf ------------------------- -Subagueousland sf sf FOR COMMERCIAL BOATRAMPS, THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION _17- APPENDIX E, Boat Ramps 3. Fred Jones Route 1, Box 220 Proposed 12' 2. Johnston City, Virgi x 40'Concrete Parcel *A" 0 boatramp E. R. Howe 24609 @o 224 FourMlle Rd Somecity, VA N '10 23056 C Nk\%NS 097 Parcel "B" Applicant aw- a log. 10 ............ Parcel "C* Nan Puckette Box 300 Plan View Buckplace, VA 23169 ......... . ............ Scale 1"= 100' .......... ............. .............. ............... . ........... Z ......... Shoreline at site Proposed 12'w n precast steel rein non-vegetated. concrete boatram N., Appro Cl 12 ............... f rMo MHW Upland ir from MLW .............. MHW` +2.0 MLW 0.0 . . ..... -4.0 Existing bottom 4-Cron Section Vlem( NA"- "A" Scale: 1"=10' Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed boatramp Prolect Cross Sectional in Wiggins Crook at Lewisville Bay 1. Nan Puckette View County of West 2. Elizabeth R. Howe 3. Fred Jones Hill Boatramp Project Applicant Carlton L. Hill Shoot I of Date 3-19-93 -18- APPENDIX F --BULKHEADS & ASSOCIATED BACKFILL PLEASE CONIPLET`E THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER TIRE QUESTIONS. ITIEDRAWINGSMUST CONTAIN THIE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLEM Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary igh water line (nontidal) channelward encroachment relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water lines location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) return walls (if applicable) connection with existing bulkhead(s) (if applicable) proposed prap scour protection (if applicable) proposed backfill length of bulkhead Cross Section Drawing design & dimensions including all structural components (i.e. deadmen, knee braces, sheeting, etc.) material to be used for construction existing c ntours of the bottom and marsh peat surface mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) proposed backfill base width and height of proposed riprap scour protection (if applicable) filter cloth Vicinity Map ne name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . a) Is any portion of the project maintenance or replacement of an existing and currently serviceable bulkhead and/or backfill? Yes - No Linear feet existing: b) If yes, is it possible to construct the new bulkhead no greater than 2 feet channelward of the existing bulkhead? Yes -No If your answer is "No", explain: 2. Describe type of construction and materials to be used, including source of backfill material and its composition (e.g. 80% sand, 15% clay and 5% silt), and all fittings for the bulkhead: 3. Will any portion of the project be placed on wetlands or subaqueous land? - Yes No If your answer is yes, indicate the square footage and type of area(s) to be impacted: Tidal Nontidal Vegetated wetlands sf sf -Non-vegetated wetlands sf ------------------------- Subaqueous land sf 7f _19- APPENDIX F, Bulkheads & Associated Backfill Kover Creek Ti all to Proposed 11 5'timber bulkhead, with ex! new w 9' return wall, placed landward of MHW Fk)od isting bulkhead and all ve etated wetlands. Ebb --No- return Proposed 9' Return with Rip - Rap to A prevent flanking 111-1 1 PIN Deck 4 PIN Lot 6 101 Applicants V House Lot 5 Smedley Leedom 111 First Street Ro A Iseliville, Virginia Adds 22406 Circle 203 court Prope Ine Prope '@& Ljne Lot 4 G "v re 6x6 Sandy f 11 H:r G Deadman .. ........ . Anchorat ........... each % Pile % 2"above % Galvanized tieback MHW 41 rod or cable ........... ...... MH`W MLW fift4 th Vegetated 110 14. watland 2x8 to remain 4 degrees Tongue & Groove U Shoot Piles % 2' "-o*- Fender Pile S'O.C. A SECTION'A'-'A' Scale: 1/4" = 1 '-0' Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed bulkhead project Cross Sectional In Kover Creek at lblson Bay 1. Smedley Leedom View County of West 2. Mickey Mac Williams Bulkhead Applicant Bruce Williams Scale 1 40' Shoot 1 Of Date 2/24/93 ME -- MEN -20- APPENDIX G -- FILL PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER TTIE QUESTIONS. THEDRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN TBE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLETE. Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name (if applicable) dimensions of area to be filled existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference location of vegetated wetlands at the project site property lines, and location of adjacent property owners mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) - channelward encroachment relative to mean high/mean low water lines (tidal) or ordinary high water line (nontidal) - width of the waterway (if applicable) ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) Cross Section Drawing existing contours of the bottom elevation of proposed fill structure or method used to contain fill mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) vicinity Map Ile name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). 1 What is the source and amount of the fill material? cubic yards 2. State the type and composition percentage of the fill material (e.g. 80% sand, 15% clay, 5% silt): 3. Explain the purpose of the filling activity & the type of structure to be built on the filled area: 4. If filling activity is proposed in a wetlands, what is the distance from the nearest waterbody? 5. Will any of the fill be placed on wetlands or subaqueous land? Yes No If your answer is yes, indicate the square footage and type of area(s) to be impacted: Tidal Nontidal Vegetated wetlands sf sf Non-vegetated wetlands sf ------------------------- .Subagueousland sf sf 6. Describe the method(s) that will be used for sedimentation and erosion control: 7. What is the approximate drainage area and average stream flow? - square miles cfs THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -21- APPENDIX G, Filling Waters Wetlands Schaup Rec. Center 01/0,70, 11041, 04@ 105' PIN Property Line 10 BMP Farking Lot 17so. % Proposed \0 A A Shopping Center -NLI- limits of 0-0 constru Ion N ------- 600' 40 C CL 0. . ... ... ........... 2 PIN sb6ha"'A ue Wetland impacts 1.37 acres Proposed mitigati a Acre S:1), mitigation plan to be submitted .......... . ........... .......... SE A - A Old Weiland Now Welland a Boundary Boundary 400' 3:1 Slope Fill 97'above . ......... 9@8' above Mitig so sea level a level Erosion and Sediment Center reek Control Structure (see approved US Plan) Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed dredging project Cross Sectional in Leedom Crook at Perkin$ Bay 01* @10Z - "' 6\014"-0114 ct Adjacent Pr' 1. M. Schaup View Knepper Filling Project County of Woodward 2. rC. Jon" Scale 1 500' Applicant D-A- Knepper Sheet 1 of Data 1/29/92 -22- APPENDIX H -- RIPRAP REVETWIENT & ASSOCIATED BACKFUL PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESnONS. ME DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN ITIE FOLLOWING INFORNIATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLETE.- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal ) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) channelward encroachment relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water lines connection with existing bulkhead or riprap structures (if applicable) proposed backfill length of revetment Cross Section Drawing proposed backfill mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water (nontidal) existing contours of the shoreline and/or bank dimensions of proposed revetment filter cloth buried toe or riprap apron proposed grading of existing bank relative to mean highlordinary high water Vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . What will be the average amount of material (placed below the plane of mean high water or ordinary high water) per linear foot of shoreline? -----Cu.yd(s).per ft OR -ton(s) per ft. 2. What type of material will be used for construction of the riprap revetment (e.g. quarry stone, cinder blocks, etc.)? 3. What will be the average weight of the: Core material (bottom layers) - pounds per stone Armor material (top 2 layers ) - pounds per stone 4. If the revetment will be backfilled, describe the composition of the material to be used (e.g. 80% sand, 15% clay and 5% silt): 5. What is the source of the backfill material? 6. Will any portion of the project be placed on wetlands or subaqueous land? - Yes - No If your answer is yes, indi te the square footage and of area(s) to be impacted: Tidal Nontidal Vegetated wetlands sf sf Non-vegetated wetlands sf ------------------------- Subaqueous land sf sf THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -23- APPENDIX H, Riprap Revetment & Associated Backfill '.-Je Scale 1" 40' '0 01) ee* Proposed 75' Rlprap revatment placed at or A-.000, landward of MHW .0@11 1-10 "x E - rn Porch PIN lk Ot CO) 0 Applicants @1 0 A Brick Hous 2 Christine Frye -:o\ Routs 6, Box 3 Calico, Virginia an b 4'above MHW 200 lb. Proposed Riprap 50 - - - - - - - -- - stones, 1 ton per foot, placed .... along existing bank Now grade with grass cover Vegetation to remain B Section Not to scall 3 MHW MLW- A 10 - 25 lb. core stone A base on filter cloth SEC'nON'A'. 'A$ Buried too below MLW Not to scale Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed R*votmnt Project 1. Courtney Smith Cross Sectional In Neikirk Crook at Roadley Bay View Berg Riprap Revetment County of Culpepper 2. Christine Frye Applicant Bart Berg Shoot J of Date 3-17-93 -24- APPENDIX I -- MARSH TOE STABU17ATION PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECELI[ST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THEDRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN TUE FOLLOWING INFORNIATION OR 1HEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOM[PLEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) existing and proposed structures showing distance relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) length of structure Cross Section Drawing mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) existing contours of the bottom and marsh peat surface dimensions of proposed structure deadmen, tie-backs, knee braces, or other methods to be used to anchor the structure filter cloth buried toe or riprap apron vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . What type of material will be used (e.g. quarry stone, cinder blocks, treated tongue and groove timber, etc.)? 2. If riprap will be used for construction, provide the following information: a) average amount of cubic yards OR tons used per linear foot of structure? cu.yd(s). _ton(s) b) will filter cloth be used? Yes No c) average weight of the: Core material (bottom layers) _ pounds per stone Armor material (top 2 layers ) - pounds per stone 3. Will any portion of the project be placed on wetlands or subaqueous land? Yes -No If your answer is yes, indicate the amount and type of area(s) to be impacted: Square feet Vegetated wetlands Non-vegetated wetlands Subaqueous land -25- APPENDIX 1, Marsh Toe Stabilization 00 Proposed 80'of Marsh Toe Stabilization @4 Porch PIN opt C 0 Applicants Brick Hous -j -01 2 J. H. Lipscomb IN Route 6, Box 3 10. Calico, Virginia Fringe Ma .......... Proposed Marsh Toe Stabilization: 1/16 / Ft., 10 - 25 lbs stone placed no higher than MHW. MHW CM rs e Filter Clot MLW A A SECTIONW-W Scale: 1 V-00 Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed Marsh Too Stabilization Cross Sectional in Oviens Crook at Knowles Bay 1. J. H. Lipscomb View Watkinson Marsh Toe County of WQst 2. L. Musser Stabilization Applicant A. Watkinson Scale 1' = 40' Shoot I of 1 Date =4/93 -26- APPENDIX J -- DREDGING/NUNING/EXCAVATING PLEASE CONIPLEM THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THEDRAWINGSMUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCONIPLETF_ Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures width of the waterway, measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nonudal) ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) - location and dimensions of area proposed to be dredged benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal), or ordinary high water line (nontidal) location and aerial extent of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners location of existing channels location of dredged material disposal area if located on-site** location and dimensions of buffer zone between dredge cut and vegetated wetlands existing depths in the project area based on mean low water (tidal) or ordinary high water (nontidal) Cross Section Drawing for Diedge Aiea Cross Section Drdwing for Disposal Ama - existing contours of the bottom - proposed berms - dredge cut - slopes, average depth, bottom & top width - proposed spillways - existing depths based on mean low water (tidal) - ponding depth of dredged material - existing depths based on ordinary high water (nontidal) - proposed project depths (after dredging) Vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). "For off-site disposal areas provide a drawing that includes the location, dimensions, benchmarks, berms and/or spillways, and how the material will be transported. 1. How many cubic yards of material will be dredged by/from: NEW MAINTENANCE Hydraulic Dragline Clamshell Other Hydraulic Dragline Clamshell Other Vegetated Wetlands Non-Veg. Wetlands Subaqueous Land TOW 2. State the composition of the material (e.g. clay 25%, sand 25%, silt 50%): 3. How will the dredged material be retained to prevent re-entry into the waterway? 4. Will the dredged material be used for any commercial purpose? - Yes - No 5. For mining projects: a. Explain the operation plans on a separate sheet of paper. e.g. frequency (e.g. every 6 wks), duration (Apr - Sep), cubic yards to be removed per operation, temporary storage, handling of dredged material, how equipment will access the dredge site. b. have you applied for a permit from the VA Dept of Mines, Minerals, & Energy? - Yes - No 6. What is the approximate drainage area and average stream flow? - square miles - cfs 7. If maintenance dredging, when was dredging last performed? (provide documentation). THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION _27- APPENDIX J, Dredgingt MiningtExcavating Pin 2300' across waterway 80, 10 1, ......... ... vv:: I..... ... AREA TO BE DREDGED ........... .......... ............. 7@, ... vv: ...... ........ Existing Pier 7 *.,:"*:,:*:,: ................... A MMI: M 0 1 :*:,: N. I - ... ......... 1> . ............. . K.: 2' V.... I I ......... ::*:,:*:,:,:*:*:*:::*:*:!:*:,:*:.::.:.:.:.:-: ... :-- M v: . ................. ............... ...... 9 n epths at MHW 16 4n F: ... V: ... ........... B B M AREA TO -EDGEL) Pin 2 .......... .......... .......... AV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."I ........... A A Not to scale CLUBHOUSE MHW - - - - - - - - - - - MLW 2:1 a Proposed Dredging Now Bottom depth 5'/ Existing Bottom/ Note: The 997 cubic yards Now Bottom Depth of dredged material will be B placed In a 2 acre disposal to match exiting site at Houbel Farms. channel depth ott 6' Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed dredging projecrt Cross Sectional in Ferguson Creek at Sneed Bay 1. J. G. Cundiff View County of Byrd 2. C. E. Bigelow Grabb Dredging Project Applicant R. J. Grabb Scale 1'= 40' Sheet 1 of Date 1/29M2 -28- APPENDIX K -- GROINS & JErM PLEASE COWLEIE THE CIIECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. ITIE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN TUE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMFLEIF- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures location and dimensions of proposed structure spacing between structures (both existing and proposed) benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) location of existing channels direction of net sand transport along the shoreline location of scour protection or spurs (if applicable) channelward encroachment relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water lines Cross Section Drawing length and height of structure relative to mean low water (tidal) or ordinary high water (nontidal) mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) existing contours of the bottom and/or marsh peat surface height of channelward end of groin relative to mean low water End View Drawing (if riprap is used for construction) design and dimensions of structure (i.e. base & top widths, height, and slope) vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). 1 . What type of material(s) are to be used for the construction? 2. a. If using riprap, what will be the average weight of the: Core material (bottom layers) pounds per stone Armor material (top 2 layers pounds per stone b. Will filter cloth be used? Yes No 3. Are there similar structures in the vicinity of the project site? Yes No If your answer is "yes", describe the type and location of the structures: 4. Will the channelward end of the structure be marked to show a hazard to navigation? - Yes No 5. Has the project been reviewed by the Shoreline Erosion Advisory Service (SEAS)? Yes No If yes, please attach a copy of their comments. _29- APPENDIX K, Groins& Jettles Plan View Scale: 1'= 60' Ebb lop ""*---Proposed breakwater at OHW -6.0 N Ricks Bay Proposed groin 10 -5.3 ... 2. 4(Y at C4 ML 311 MWH 36' Sho ea Ir Typical Jettle Cross Section Scale: 1'= 4- - - - - - MHW MLW Armor Stone Core stone 7- (Quarry run) Existing bottom XA .......... .X:7z Low Profile Groin C v Scale: 1'= 200 6x6 2x8 stringer MLW Note: 6x6 piles will be lotted % to a depth of -9 feet and sheet piles to -7 feet. Existing bottom @2x8 sheet pile (T&G) Adjacent Property Owners: Plan &Typical Proposed jetties project Cross Sectional in Ricks Say at Henderson Point 1. T. Bernard View County of West 2. C. Robinson McCarthy Applicant James McCarthy Construction Site Sheet I of 2 Date 3-27-93 -30- APPENDIX L -- BREAKWATERS PIEASE COMPLETE THE CHWKLIST AND ANSWER TBE QUESTIONS. TIM DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN TBE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCONWLETM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) channelward encroachment relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water lines dimensions of structure Cross Section Drawing dimensions of the breakwater existing contours of the bottom mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) End View Drawing (if riprap or gabion baskets are used for construction) design and dimensions of structure (i.e. base & top widths, height, and slope) Vicinity Map ne name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . What type of materials are to be used for the construction of the breakwater? 2. Are there similar structures in the vicinity of the project site? - Yes No If your answer is "yes", describe the type and location of the structures. 3. Will filter cloth be used? Yes No -31- APPENDIX L, Breakwaters LeRoy Creek -04- Flo 36' 54' WS 36' MW 1.0 540 low 1 do Ebb :F: -------- - --------- MLW (0.0) 20' MHW (+2 115' Base of ban+ 5 Top of bank 6.0) 94' 94' 40' 1 91, 91 2. ........ .. Property of N 0.1 Property of R. Stouff or 21 C. Charles 112 12' House a. Propert ic" Jim Br Gablon breakwater Composed of 1-3x3xl 2 PVC coated ba .......... placed on top of 2- 1.5x3xi 2 PVC coated baskets; f liter cloth placed under the structure; length 36 feet. 3' Fo*- 3 b 3' 3' pi Detail +6.0 MHW (+2.0) - - - - - - - - - MLW (0-0) Existing slope 2:1 1 : Loca'tio'n of MLw Filter cloth 40' -15. Datum MLW 0.0 Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed Breakwater project Cross Sectional in LeRoy Creek at Lewis Bay 1. C. Charles View Brogdon Breakwater Project County of North 2. R. Stouff or Applicant Jim Brogdon Scale 1 40' Shoot I of Date 3-20-93 -32- APPENDIX M -- BEACH NOURISFEVIENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOWIJMM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name mean low waterand mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) dimensions of the area to be nourished with benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference location of vegetated wetlands at the project site property lines and location of adjacent property owners existing structure's - location and dimensions of structures proposed to stabilize the area to be nourished channelward encroachment of the nourished area relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water location of marsh vegetation to be used for stabilization (if applicable) Cross Section Drawing mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) - contour and slope of existing beach contour and slope of the nourished area groins, breakwaters or other structures existing or proposed to stabilize the nourished area elevation at the channelward end of the nourished area elevation of vegetation to be planted relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Provide the following: a. source of material: b. volume of material: cubic yards C. type and composition of material (e.g. sand 90%, clay 10%): d. mode of transportation to the project site (e.g. truck, pipeline, etc.): 2. Describe the type(s) of vegetation proposed for stabilization and the proposed planting schedule. THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -33- CL Z 0 Property of: Residence of: K George Kub 0 Howard Wiggins ir 0 CL 0 + C.) Top of bank (+10.0) N Base of b n (4-4.0) 0 a) Z SD 0 0 z co 0 m Re I- 0 ........... 43' 17' NN, m 7,0 o 0 . . .... ........ Rile 0 0 N nd nsport =r 0 Flood q, - @Io o a -.4-Ebb N3 0 APPENDIX N -- INTAKFOUTTALLSTRUC7WRES PLEASE COMPI= THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THEDRAWINGSMUST CONTAIN TTIE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCONIPLE-M- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing structures dimensions of structure and benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) channelward encroachment relative to mean high/mean low/ordinary high water lines Cross Section Drawing existing contours of the bottom and banks intake or outfall pipe mean high and mean low water levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) supporting structures splash apron, if applicable filter cloth Vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Provide the following: type & size of pipe: - Intake Outfall Intakes: daily rate of withdrawal: - mgd velocity: - fps screen mesh size: inches -mm ------,Other (specify) Outfalls: daily rate of discharge: _ mgd 2. If discharge will be thermally enhanced, provide the maximum temperature. 3. What is the average stream' flow at the: Intake site? cfs Outfall site? cfs 4. What measuresare proposed to prevent bank erosion? 5. Will any structure (wingwalls, splash apron, etc.) impact wetlands or subaqueous land? Yes No If your answer is yes, indicate the square footage and type of area(s) to be impacted: Tidal Nontidal Vegetated wetlands sf sf Non-vegetated wetlands sf ---------------- Subaqueous land sf sf 5. Can the entire structure or any part of it be placed landward of all wetlands? If no, please explain. 6. What is the approximate drainage area and average stream flow? - square miles cfs THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -35- APPENDIX N, Intake Outfall Structures Property 0 [Irre- EQ. x Woodi LU Ui CC Road ..; W 0 5 a M cc 40 A 90 A Pum @x Pro"a cc 0 ... (L CC .. . ....... Note: Pump station and Pu be Installed above flood plain ale Ordinary high water= 135! Intake structure 12 ............ u / Existing bank -0-Flow W -OR Pump station / ManholeA 'ARZ-1ritako A with submersible pump A strwure Adjacent Property Plan & Proposed Irrigaton project Owners: Cross Sectional in Hume River at Kube Cove View ____1 I a 1. A. Spingarn Golf Course Water Intake County of Bamard 2. A. Jennings Project Applicant P. Minkin Scale 1"= 40' Sh"t I of Data 3-20-93 -36- APPENDIX 0 -- NONTIDAL STREAM CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER ITIE QUESTIONS. T11EDRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR TBEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOM1PLEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name ordinary high water line location, length and width of the existing channel location, I ngth and width of the proposed channel benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference width of the stream (measuring from ordinary high water to ordinary high water) location of existing and proposed non-vegetated or vegetated wetlands, bars, islands, riffle and pool complexes or other special aquatic sites at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners direction of flow location & dimensions of bank stabilization structures Cross Secdon Drawing (Prepare one drawing for the existing channel and one for Ow proposed channel) existing and proposed stream channels including depth,base width and top width dimensions and slope of bank stabilization structures filter cloth ordinary high water level existing contours of the bottom location and dimensions of low flow channel (if applicable) vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Provide the following: a) approximate normal flow rate and drainage area of the existing water body cfs square miles b) approximate normal flow rute and drainage area of the new or modified water body cfs square miles c) method used to stabilize the banks: d) type & approximate composition percentage of the existing stream bed (e.g. cobble 35%, rock 45%, sand 20%, etc.): 2. Will low flow channels be maintained? Yes No 3. Will any structures be placed in the stream to create riffles, pools, meanders, etc? If "Yes" please explain. THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -37- APPENDIX 0, Nontidal Stream Channel Modifications Mile post 8 Electrical substation N 07 Now OHW Proposed gravel bar A A cut ........... N1 s: r i 9 basin 8 square miles CW= 8 Z@7@ average width of OHW 20' ew averag e width of OHW 20' Existin bar . ............ be stablized with 25-30 lb and fifter cloth Propos ure road I Top of cut and fill (454'contour elevation) Cut Ordinary high water (450'contour elevation) Stream channel bottom (445'contour elevation) Low flow 8' wide channel (4431 contour elevation) 4' Odgi al .strea Stream channel bottom redirection, excavated into upland area Cross Section "Au - "All Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed stream channel modiff licattloo 1. J. G. Smith Cross Sectional In Leedom Crook at Big Mount View Construction site County of Thomas 2. C. E. Barton Scale I"= 40' Applicant R. Henderson Shoot 1 of Date 1/29/92 -38- APPENDIX P -- r4PO1UNDM1HNTS/DAMS PLEASE CONIPLETE THE CHMIaBT AND ANSWER TIHE QUESTIONS. TTIE DRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR TUEY WIIJL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPIEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing and proposed structures dimensions of structure and benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference ordinary high water line location of vegetated wetlands at the project site shoreline, property lines, and location of adjacent property owners direction of flow width of the waterway (measuring from ordinary high water to ordinary high water risers emergency spillway, if applicable Cross Section Drawing (Strearn) base width and height of structure existing contours of the bottom normal pool elevation and design high and low water elevations, for dams with fluctuating water levels (e.g. hydropower or water supply reservoirs) risers emergency spillway, if applicable Vicinity Map Including the name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site. map showing the area to be flooded (U.S.G.S. quad sheet or other topographic map is preferred). 1 . Materials to be used for construction (earth, rock, concrete, etc.)? 2. What will be the impoundment's: a) storage capacity: acre-feet b) surface area: acres 3. What is the: a) current average flow? cfs b) proposed outflow? cfs c. will the impoundment structure be designed to pass a minimum flow at all times? - Yes No If "Yes", what will be the minimum rate of flow? cfs 4. What is the drainage area of the water body upstream of the proposed impoundment? - square miles 5. Does your project comply with State Dam Safety Criteria? Yes -No If your answer is "No" or "Uncertain", contact the Bureau of Flood Plain Protection at telephone (804) 371-6095. 6. a. What will be the area of waters or wetlands affected/flooded by the impoundment? acres b. How much of impoundment structure will be located on the stream bed? - square feet 7. Are fish ladders being proposed to accommodate the passage of fish? - Yes No THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -39- APPENDIX P, Impoundments / Dams 1* 01 pro e 2 325 proposed now contour lines 320 Emer y 3PIIJal@ lion 311 K2! 310 300 *Ad 4r. amse)(9 Fun ... 30 Riser & pipe 305 ..... 310 0.04 acres wetlan 311 be flooded 32 Emergency Riser & 0 PIP spillway 31 1011 - 3Z: . . . . . . . . . . . . .. levatio\n Top of dam 314' a4' Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed recreational /form pond Cross Sectional in Ramseys Run at - 1. J. G. Smith View County of W93t 2. C. E. Barton 0. McDonalds Pond Applicant 0. McDonald Scale I* = 40' Shoot I Of Date 1/29/92 -40- APPENDIX Q -- UTILITY CROSSINGS PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THEDRAWINGSMUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCONIPLEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing and proposed structures - dimensions of structures and benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site property lines on both sides of stream with location of adjacent property owners width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) type and location of support structures (e.g. towers, poles, platforms) - location of temporary stockpiles for excavated material (if applicable) location of temporary construction access location of utility line/maintenance right of way Cross Section Drawing mean low water level (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) existing contours of the bottom and bank vertical distance above mean high/mean low/ordinary high water for overhead crossings depth below stream bottom for submarine crossings distance that the structure will cross the waterbody relative to mean low water/ordinary high water vicinity Map The name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). I . Describe the materials to be used and the method of construction in the order in which the construction will be accomplished: 2. For overhead crossings, if there are overhead crossings or bridges in the area, how high are they relative to mean high/low water/ordinary high water? 3. If the project is a power line crossing, what will be the nominal system voltage of the line? 4. Will there be an excess of excavated material? Yes No If yes, please describe the method of transporting and disposing of the material. 5. What is the approximate drainage area and average stream flow? - square miles cfs 6. Will excess material be temporarily stockpiled in wetlands? - Yes No If "Yes", will the stockpiled material be placed on filter fabric or some other type of impervious surface? Yes No THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -41- APPENDIX 0, Utility Crossings 0 2. 0 &TT-p-rip@r-tylinO N 0 All excavated material will @ be stockpiled within construction (D easement. In wetlands, filter fabric Location of stockpiles will be used under stockpiles, in wetlands. excess material will be removed. agetated Sift fence to be used to retain material - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Yyater Main cl@ I-- Construction/Access Easement ............. Utility ........... lasement -n Vegetated ptlands Kennedy Hig Z4 I. ............ .. ....... . .......... Rip-Rap with Proposed Valve abric Vegetated Wetlands Box Existing 424' ff -JL.& I Bank 418' 12"Forced Main Pro roposed 414' 12" Gate elves 12" Gate 412' Vales I 20P Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Proposed Utlitty Lino Crossing Cross Sectional in Priest Crook 1. C. Schutz View County Of West Jennings Sewage Line 2. K. Mayne Scale 1 20' Applicant Arthur Jennings Shoot 1 of 1 Date 1/29192 -42- APPENDIX R -- ROAD CROSSINGS PLEASE COMPLETE THE CHECKLIST AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. THEDRAWINGS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OR THEY WILL BE RETURNED AS INCOMPLEM- Plan View Drawing north arrow waterway name existing and proposed structures or fill dimensions of structures and benchmarks showing distances to fixed points of reference mean low water and mean high water lines (tidal) ordinary high water line (nontidal) location of vegetated wetlands at the project site property lines on both sides of stream with location of adjacent property owners width of the waterway (measuring from mean high water to mean high water (tidal) or ordinary high water to ordinary high water (nontidal) ebb and flood (tidal) or direction of flow (nontidal) location and type of support structures Cross Section Drawing mean high and low water levels levels (tidal) ordinary high water level (nontidal) existing contours of the stream beds and bank dimensions relative to mean high water or ordinary high water height of bridge, if applicable culverts (indicate size), if applicable culvert invert elevations Vicinity Map 'Me name of the map from which the vicinity map was taken and the exact location of the project site must be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, street map, or county map is preferred). NOTE: Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) standards require that the backwater for a 100 year storm not exceed I foot for all roads, culverts and bridges. 1 . On a separate sheet describe: the materials to be used, the method of construction, and the order in which the construction will be accomplished including cofferdams (if applicable). 2. What is the approximate drainage area and average flow rate of the stream? - sq. miles cfs 3. Will any fill will be located on wetlands or subaqueous land? - Yes - No If your answer is yes, indicate the square footage and type of area(s) to be impacted: Tidal Nontidal Vegetated wetlands sf sf Non-vegetated wetlands sf ------------------ ------ Subaqueous land sf sf 4. Have you conducted hydrologic/hydraulic studies to verify adequacy of the culverts? Yes No If your answer is "Yes", please attach a copy of the study/report. 5. If the project is a bridge crossing and there are similar crossings in the area, what is the vertical distance above mean high/low water or ordinary high water for the other crossings ? THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REQUIRES APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT THE ADDENDUM LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS APPLICATION -43- APPENDIX R, Road Crossings 2. Property line 3@ % _x 3: C 1: 0 0 0 CL CL N 0 0 0 0 2 - 36" Steel culverts (8 foot Applicants 010 on center) with Class I Rip- residence and rap scour protection on a 3 to .2 garage I slope. A A /concrete Drive', PA .......... ..... ..... Top of fill - 142' OHW - 133' Substrate - 130 2 - 36" Steel culverts with Claw Elie) I Rip-rap scour protection on a 3 to I slope. 51 --bottom of. Detail not to sc Top of fill, 147 elevation Route 636 0" elevation 133,(top of fill In Corps Crook bottom elevation 130 judsdicWn) A A Cross Section "A" - 'An Adjacent Property Owners: Plan & Propos*Wd ro crossing project Cross Sectional In McCarthyCreelbt NIA 0 M 0 7 0 0 T 00; S 1. Ned Burger View County of Jones 2. Joe Baumer Road Crossing Applicant J. Rubelman Scale In = 40' Shoot 1 of Date 3-27-93 -44- AGENT CER77FICA TION OF AUTHORIZATION I hereby certify that I have authorized to act on my behalf and (APPLICANTS NAME) (AGENTS NAME) take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this permit and any and all standard and special conditions attached. We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE AGENT'S SIGNATURE DATE DATE Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence. Also, please provide the name(s) and complete address(es) of all legal property owner(s) as shown on your recorded deed. NAO FM 1022, 30 APR 93 -45- ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM own land next to or across the water from (ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME PRINTED) the land of . I have reviewed the applicant's project drawings dated (APPLICANTS NAME) to be submitted for all necessary Local, State, and Federal permits. (DATE) I HAVE NO COMMENT DO NOT OBJECT --DO OBJECT to the project. The applicant has agreed to contact me for additional comments if the proposal changes prior to construction of the project. (Before signing this form, please be sure you have checked the appropriate box above.) ADJACENTPRCPEKIYOWNS@C S SIGNATURE DATE NOTE: IF YOU OBJECT TO THE PROPOSAL - THE REASONS YOU OPPOSE THE PROJECT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO VMRC IN WRITING, AN OBJECTION WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN DENIAL OF THE PROJECT, BUT, VALID COMPLAINTS WILL BE GIVEN FULL CONSIDERATION DURING THE PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS NAO FM 1020, Rev 30 APR 93 NOTE: Please photocopy this form if additional copies are needed. -47- Appucmrs AND CONTRACTOMS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM have contracted (APPLICANT'S NAME) (CONTRACTOR/COMPANY NAME) to perform the work described in the application signed and dated (DATE) We will read and abide by all conditions as set forth in all Local, State, and Federal permits as required for this project. We understand that failure to follow the conditions of the permits may constitute a violation of applicable Local, State, and Federal statutes and that we will be liable for any civil and/or criminal penalties imposed by these statutes. SEE FEDERAL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS AND RELATED STATE CODES. In addition, we agree to make available a copy of any permit to any regulatory representative visiting the project site to ensure permit compliance. If we fail to provide the applicable permit upon request, we understand that the representative will have the option of stopping our operation until it has been determined that we have a properly signed and executed permit and are in full compliance with all terms and conditions. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE AND TITLE DATE (if applicable) CONTRACTOR'S NAME (PRR,1TED/TYPED) CONTRACTOR'S OR FIRM'S ADDRESS OR NAME OF FIRM NAO FM 1021, Rev 30 APR 93 -49- Regulatory Agencies Federal: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096 (804) 441-7652 The Corps of Engineers is responsible for administering a permit program pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers & Harbors Act of 1999 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Specifically, permits are required for construction, dredging, and filling activities proposed by landowners, businesses, developers, and government agencies in tidal and noncidal rivers, creeks, and tidal and nontidal wetlands. in evaluating projects, the Corps considers all comments received from the public and government agencies and conducts a public interest review that weighs foreseeable project benefits against foreseeable project detriments. Field Officg.-,;- Blackstone Field Office Fredericksburg Field Office Post Office Box 109 Breezewood Office Park Blackstone, Virginia 292-6617 10703 Courthouse Road, #270 (804) 292-6617 Fredericksburg, Virginia 22408 (703) 898-3568 Christiansburg Field office Tudor Square, Suite 9 Lynchburg Field Office 209-211 Roanoke Street Second Floor Christiansburg, Virginia 24073 760S Timberlake Road (703) 382-6740 Lynchburg, Virginia 24502 (904) 23 7-2145 Dumfries Field Office Plaza South, Suite 102 Northern Neck Field office 138 Graham Park Road Post Office Box 459 Dumfries, Virginia 22026 Lively, Virginia 22507 (703) 221-6967 (804) 462-5382 Eastern Shore Field Office Richmond Field Office General Delivery Hanover Business Center Accomac, Virginia 23301 305-B Ashcake Road (804) 787-3133 Ashland, Virginia 23005 (804) 752-746417484 State: Virginia Marine Resources Commission Habitat Management Division Post Office Box 756 2600 Washington Avenue Newport News, Virginia 23607-0756 (804) 24 7-2200 The Virginia Marine Resources Commission serves the citizenry of the Commonwealth of Virginia by combining a public interest review process with effective management, regulation and protection of the State's marine fisheries, submerged lands (state wide) and coastal resources (tidal wetlands and coastal sand duneslbeaches). it is the goal of the Commission's Habitat Management Division to act as stewards of the Commonwealth's submerged lands and ensure the protection and wise use of these coastal lands and natural resources through the implementation of a regulatory review process and permitting program. Department of Environmental Quality Post Office Box 11143 Richmond, Virginia 23230-5000 (804) 527-5061 One branch of the Department of Environmental Quality, the Virginia Water Protection Program, is responsible for the administration of the water quality programs delegated to the Commonwealth under the Clean Water Act and as required by the State Water Control Law. Under both State and Federal Law, the Department functions as the principal water quality management agency within the Commonwealth of Virginia. The goal of the Virginia Water Protection Program is to ensure the protection of the beneficial uses of State waters including nontidal wetlands, prevent degradation of valuable water resources and to work toward the restoration of waters whose quality has been degraded. The Department issues permits for all activities which may result in the physical, biological or chemical alteration of State waters. -51- Resource Agencies Federal: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Section 841 Chestnut Street 3ES42 Philadelphia, PA 19107 (215) 597-3360 The Environmental Protection Agency oversees compliance with federal environmental laws, including the Clear, Water Act, the Clean Air Act, Superfund, the National Environmental Policy Act, etc. The Agency provides advice and recommendations to the Corps of Engineers to ensure that all authorized projects avoid and minimize adverse environmental impacts. Important features considered during Clean Water Act project reviews include but are not limited to impacts on water quality, flood storage, fisheries, and wildlife habitat. U. S. Fish & wildlife Service Virginia Field Office Post Office Box 480 Mid-County Centre, U. S. Route 17 White Marsh, Virginia 23193 @804) 693-6694 The objectives of the Department of the Interior and the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) are to conserve fish and wildlife resources and their habitats and to protect public trust rights of use and enjoyment associated with waters of the United States. The Service provides advice and recommendations to the Corps of Engineers to ensure that all authorized projects are the least environmentally damaging alternative and in the public's interest in safeguarding fish and wildlife resources from unnecessary loss and degradation. The Service is also responsible for assisting the Corps to meet their responsibilities under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act National Marine Fisheries Service Management Division oxford LaboraCory oxford, Maryland 21654 (301) 226-5771 President's Advisory Council on Historic Preservation The Old Post Office Building 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 809 Washington, DC 20004 (202) 796-0505 The President's Advisory Councii on Historic Preservation (council) provides comments to the Corps of Engineers (Corps) on undertakings that affect historic properties. The Council's goal is to accommodate historic preservation concerns with the needs of the Corps' Regulatory program through the Section 106 process. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires federal agencies with jurisdiction over federally licensed undertakings to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties (defined as districts, buildings, structures, or archaeological slCes which are included on or are eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places) and to offer the Council the opportunity to comment on the project's effects. The Council encourages consideration of historic preservation concerns during the early planning stages of a project through consultation with the Corps, the State Historic Preservation officer and other interested persons. -52- State: Virginia Department of Game & Inland Fisheries Environmental Officer Post Office Box 11104 Richmond, Virginia 23230-1104 (804) 367-8999 The Virginia Department of Game & Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) is the primary wildlife and freshwater management agency in the Commonwealth, and has legal jurisdiction over state or federally endangered or threatened species, excluding insects and plants. VDGIF is a consulting agency under the U.S. Fish & wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), and provides environmental analysis of projects or permit applications coordinated through the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, the Virginia State Water Control Board, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and other state or federal agencies. The department's role in these procedures is to determine likely impacts on fish and wildlife resources and habitats, and to recommend appropriate measures to avoid, reduce, or mitigate for those impacts. Primary issues of concern to VDGIF include impacts upon upland, wetland, aquatic fish & wildlife and their habitats; protection of instream flow; endangered or threatened species; and impacts upon streams or other surface waters and interconnected groundwaters. Sediment and erosion control, water quality protection, and disposal or handling of hazardous or toxic materials are also of concern to the Department. Virginia Institute of Marine Science Wetlands Section Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 (904) 642-7000 The Wetlands Advisory Program of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) provides scientific and technical advice for the use of all participants in the shoreline permit process. To accomplish this, a written impact assessment report is prepared for most projects requiring a wetlands or subaqueous bed permit. The report describes the marine environmental impacts of the proposed activity and suggests alternatives andlor modifications which will lessen any significant adverse effects to aquatic resources resulting from the proposal. Copies of the advisory report are provided to the applicant andlor the agent and all regulatory1resource agencies. Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation Division of Soil & Water Conservation Shoreline Erosion Advisory Service (SEAS) Post Office Box 1024 Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 (804) 642-7121 The Shoreline Erosion Advisory Service is a technical section of the Department of Conservation & Recreation. The SEAS program provides technical advice regarding environmentally sound protective measures for shoreline erosion control. 'The SEAS service is available upon request to property owners throughout Virginia's tidal region. Virginia Department of Historic Resources 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (904) 786-3143 The Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHP) represents the interests of the Commonwealth and its citizens in preserving Virginia's cultural heritage. The director of the VDHR is the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The role of the SHPO is to assist the Corps in meeting its responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The VDHR assists the Corps with identifying historic properties, with assessing effects upon them and in considering alternatives to reduce, avoid or mitigate a project's adverse effects. -53- Local Regulatory Agencies (wetlands Boards) Accomack County: (804) 787-5721 New Kent County: (804) 966-9861 Cape Charles County: (804) 331-3259 Newport News: (804) 247-8437 Charles City County: (804) 829-9217 Norfolk: (804) 441-2152 Chesapeake: (804) 547-6248 Northampton County: (804) 678-5872 Colonial Heights: (804) 520-9275 Northumberland County: (804) 580-8910 Essex County: (804) 443-4951 Poquoson: (804) 868-7151 Fairfax County: (703) 324-1210 Portsmouth: (804) 393-8836 Fredericksburg: (703) 372-1179 Prince William County: (703) 335-6830 Gloucester County: (804) 693-4040 Richmond County: (804) 333-3415 Hampton: (804) 727-6142 Stafford County: (703) 659-8668 Hopewell: (804) 541-2267 Suffolk: (804) 934-3111 isle of Wight: (804) 357-3191 Surry County: (804) 294-5210 James City County: (804) 253-6622 Virginia Beach: (804) 426-5790 King George County: (703) 775-7111 Westmoreland County: (804) 493-0121 King William County: (804) 769-4927 West Point: (804) 843-3330 Lancaster County: (804) 462-5220 Williamsburg: (804) 220-6130 Mathews County: (804) 725-5025 York County: (804) 890-3538 Middlesex County: (804) 758-4305 Soil & Water Conservation's Erosion & Sedimentation Control Offices Abingdon Chase City 252 W. Main Street, Suite 3 411 Boyd Street Abingdon, Virginia 24210 Chase City,,Virginia 23924 (703) 676-5528 (804) 372-2191 Dublin Richmond Post Office Box 1506 217 Governor Street, 3rd Floor Dublin, Virginia 24084 Richmond, Virginia 23219 (703) 831-4008 (804) 3 71 - 7489 Staunton Suffolk Route 4, Box 99-J 1548 Holland Road Staunton, Virginia 24401. Suffolk, Virginia 23434 (703) 322-9991 (804) 925-2468 Tappahannock Warrenton Post Office Box 1425 98 Alexandria Pike, Suite 33 Tappahannock, Virginia 22560 Warrenton, Virginia 22186 (804) 443-6752 (703) 347-6420 These offices may be able to prov2de adv2ce on ex-osion and sedimemtation cmtrols for shoreline and streanbank erosion as well as stozm rwater management. -54- ERAL VVEFLANDS DEIERMINATIONS Delineations are to be perfornwd using the appropriate method as directed in the current Federal manual. If you would like the Corps to verify a wetlands delineation, the following information should be provided: A Plan View Drawing showing: all proposed development (if available) location of the wetlands at the site with benchmarks property lines and location of adjacent property owners existing structures at the site sampling locations location of wells (if applicable) Please indicate whether the boundaries of the wetland at the project site have been flagged. A Vicinity Map with the name of the map from which it was taken and the exact location of the project site should be included (U.S.G.S. quad sheet, or other topographic map is preferred). In addition to the drawings, as much of the following information as possible should be provided. Completed data sheets Aerial photograph(s) of the site Soil survey with soil descriptions National Wetlands Inventory Map FEMA map Site history/Prior land use Any other supporting documents to be considered -55- FEDERAL PENAL77ES FOR VIOLA77ONS AND RELATED STATE CODES U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 1899 (33 U. S. C. 401, 403, & 404) - Penalties as provided by Section 12 of the Act (33 U. S. C. 406) are not less than $500 or more than $2,500 or I year imprisonment or both. U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U. S. C. 1251 et seq.) - Criminal penalties are not less than $2,500 per day or more than $25,000 per day or up to I year imprisonment or both; after the first violation (conviction) not more than $50,000 per day or up to 2 years imprisonment or both (33 U. S. C. 1319 (c) (1)). Civil penalties may be as much as $25,000 for each day of violation 33 U. S. C. 1319 (d) and 33 U. S. C. 1344 (s) (4). Injunctive Relief - Court order to remove, restore, or comply with other conditions. False Statements - Falsifying information in the application may result in a maximum fime of $20,000 or up to 6 months imprisonment or both. The Environmental Protection Agency also has the authority to assess administrative penalties up to $125,000 for violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. VIRGINIA MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION Title 28.2 of the Code of Virginia Chapter 12 - Submerged Lands Article I - Ownership & Uses of Submerged Lands Article 2 - Enforcement & Penalties Chapter 13 - Wetlands Article I - General Provisions Article 2 - Wetlands Zoning Ordinances & Wetlands Boards Article 3 - Permits & Review Article 4 - Enforcement & Penalties Chapter 14 - Coastal Primary Sand Dunes & Beaches Article I - General Provisions Article 2 - Coastal Primary Sand Dune Ordinance & Boards Article 3 - Permits & Review Article 4 - Enforcement & Penalties For violations under each Chapter civil charges up to $10,000.00 may be assessed by the Commission or a local Wetlands Board, or civil penalties up to $25,000.00, for each day of the violation, may be assessed by an appropriate circuit court. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Chapter 3.1, Section 62.1-44, may assess civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, willful or negligent violations are punishable by not more than 12 months in jail and a fine of not less than $2,500 or more than $25,000. Persons convicted of a felony under this section is punishable by not less than I year, nor more than three years in jail, firies not less than $5,000, nor more than $50,000 for each violation. Should the felony involve imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, it is punishable by not less than 2 years, nor more than 15 years in prison and a fine of not less than $250,000. A defendant who is not an individual, convicted of this same felony shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding the greater of $1,000,000 or three times the economic benefit that would have been realized by the activity producing the offense. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The Department of the Army permit program is authorized by Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. These laws require that individuals obtain permits that authorize structures and work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fiU material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters prior to undertaking the activity. Information provided in the joint permit application will be used in the permit review process and is a matter of public record once the application is filed. Disclosure of the requested information is voluntary; however, it may not be possible to evaluate the permit application or issue a permit if the information requested is not provided. -57- PROCESSOVG PROCEDURES Concurrent processing - When your application is received by VMRC, an application number is assigned. This number will be used when referring to your project. Copies of the application will be forwarded to the regulatory agencies by VMRC. Because of differences in jurisdiction and laws, these agencies will perform separate but concurrent reviews of your project. Site Inspections - Site inspections are necessary to evaluate proposals before, during, and after a permit is issued. Photograph.,; oLLha t sight will be taken during the on-site evaluations, Failure to allow an authorized roresentative to enter or to take photographs of conditions at the 11[Qjectsite may regult in Dcrinit denial Joint StatelFederal Public Notice - A Joint Public Notice may be used to advertise project plans. Comments received in response to the Public Notice are considered by each agency in reaching their individual decisions on the project. Certain types of projects my qualify for Corps general permits. In such cases, a joint public notice will not be prepared. The affected state and local agencies win then follow their individual regulations for advertising the project which may require publication in a local newspaper. Commenting on Notices - Adjacent property owners and others who have expressed interest in a particular area are furnished a copy of the joint public notice. In addition, local and state agencies may place a public notice in the local newspaper. Anyone may comment on a public notice. Comments must be made in writing and received by the close of the comment period specified in the public notice. Public Hearings - At the close of the Public Notice comment period Public Hearings may be held by Local, State, or Federal agencies. All applications requiring a local wetlands permit are considered at a public hearing held by the local wetlands board. Purpose of Federal Hearings - The purpose of a Federal public hearing is to acquire information that is pertinent to the decision making process and cannot be obtained through other means. Federal Hearing Procedures - Most projects usually affect only the applicant and the surrounding neighborhood. V= few 1IMiects . : a public hearilig. When a hearing is necessary, a 30 day public notice is sent out announcing the date, time and place of the hearing. A decision on the project will not bC made at the hea4ng. A 10 day comment period follows the hearing to allow for additional facts or information to be submitted before the District Engineer makes a final decision. StatelLocal Hearing Procedures - Projects affecting tidal wetlands will be heard by the appropriate Local Wetlands Board after a notice of Public Hearing has been advertised at least once a week for two consecutive weeks in a local newspaper. You should consult your local wetlands board to determine who bears the cost for this advertisement. VMRC will conduct the hearings for localities with no wetlands board. Commission Meetings - Protested applications for a Virginia Marine Resources Commission permit which cannot be resolved, projects costing over $50,000 involving encroachment upon or over State-owned subaqueous land, and all projects affecting State and local wetlands in localities without a wetlands board will be scheduled for Public Hearings by VMRC at their regularly scheduled monthly commission meetings. All interested parties will be officially notified regarding the date and time of the hearing, as well as informed of Commission meeting procedures. The Commission will make a decision on the project at the meeting unless a decision for continuance is made. Joint Processing Meetings - Pending applications that do not meet the criteria of the Corps general permits are discussed at a joint processing meeting attended by representatives from the regulatory/advisory agencies. Project impacts as well as possible alternatives are discussed. These meetings are designed to reduce processing time by eliminating duplication of agency efforts. Virginia Water Protection Permits - All applications and permits will be processed in accordance with the Virginia Water Protection Permit Regulations (VA 680-15-02) and with Procedural Rule No. 1. Finalization of Process - If the project is approved, a permit is sent to the applicant. In some cases a notarized signature as well as processing fees and royalties are required before the permit is validated. If the project is denied, the reason(s) for denial will be provided in writing. If you have questions about completing the application or drawings or on the permitting process, call any of the agencies listed on pages 51-54 of this guide. -58- MOSTFREQUENTLYASKED QUESTIONS What is the U. S. Corps of Engineers and what do they do, and why? The Corps of Engineers is a branch of the U. S. Army. You may not realize that the Corps' responsibilities go far beyond bridge and dam building. Specifically, the Corps' Regulatory Branch is responsible for regulating construction, dredging, and filling activities in waters of the United States including tidal and nontidal wetlands. Congress charged the Corps with administering Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 which prohibits obstructing or altering navigable waters of the U. S. without a permit. In 1977, the Corps was also charged with administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act which prohibits the unauthorized discharge of dredged or fill material into waters, including tidal and nontidal wetlands of the United States. What are nationwide and regional permits? A nationwide permit is a form of general permit which authorizes certain activities throughout the nation in many cases without the property owner needing to notify the Corps provided certain conditions are met. However, an application may still be required for State review. A regional permit is a general permit issued by division or district engineers on a regional basis. The Norfolk District has issued regional permits for some 20 different activities. How do I know if I need a permit? Any activity (structure, dredging, certain land clearing, filling, etc.) which obstructs, alters, or discharges fill into waters of the United States including tidal and nontidal wetlands may require a permit from the Corps, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and or the local wetlands board. You may call the appropriate agency listed at the front of the joint application booklet for further guidance. Will someone visit the site of my proposed project and tell me what is the best course of action? If you believe a site visit would assist you in developing your project plans, you may call the Corps. What is the permit process? The permitting process begins with you. You complete a Joint Permit Application and send it to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC). VMRC assigns an application number and sends copies of your application to DEQ, your local wetlands board and to the Corps. Projects not satisfying the requirements of a nationwide or regional permit may need to be advertised by public notice. The Corps is required to coordinate such applications with the Environmental Protection Agency, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. 'Me Corps considers the view of these agencies as well as comments received from the public in their evaluation of the project. What are the penalties if I do not follow the permit process? The agencies are responsible for enforcing the regulations they administer. Reported or detected violations will be investigated. Should a violation be confirmed, appropriate action will be pursued. (Seepage 57 for specific Federal and State penalties.) Where can I get further information about wetlands, wildlife, and the regulatory process? There are many sources. For information regarding wetlands, wildlife and the regulatory process you may contact any of the regulatory and advisory agencies listed on pages 51-54 of this booklet. The following agencies may also provide valuable information about aquatic resources, wetlands, wildlife and thier habitats: Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department 1-800-243-7229 (1-800-CHESBAY) Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Hotline 1-800-832-7828 As a reminder, your local wetlands board (mostly in tidal areas) or your local Soil & Water Conservation District my also provide assistance and advice on development in or affecting wetlands. Does VMRC have jurisdiction in areas other than Tidewater? Yes, in State-owned submerged lands in nontidal areas. This includes all the beds of the bays, rivers and creeks not conveyed by special grant or compact according to law. All perennial streams may be under VMRC jurisdiction. -59- DEFowrioNs, SPECAL TERMS, & ABBREVL4TIONS Acre - Foot Unit of volume of water that would cover one acre to a depth of one foot; equal to 43,560 cf. Adjacent Property Owner - Individuals owning property that shares the boundary (common property line) of the property at the project site. Anadromous fish - Fish that swim upstream to spawn. Beach Nourishment - The placement of suitable sand on a shore to restore and stabilize an eroding beach. Benchmark - A fixed point of reference used in a measure that under normal circumstances will not move or be changed. For example: the distance from the comer of a house to a telephone pole, or an official government survey marker. Breakwater - A fixed or floating structure usually constructed parallel to the shoreline to protect the shoreline from erosion by reducing the wave energy that reaches the shore. Bulkhead - an upright structure built to protect an eroding shoreline from the force of water. Community Facility for Boat Moorings - A facility operating under public or private ownership which provides mooring for boats whether on a free, rental, or fee basis or for the convenience of a particular group of individuals. Complete Application -Tlie basic application, all applicable appendices, and drawings properly filled out and completed. CFS -Cubic feet per second. Cubic Yard - A measure of volume; length x width x depth = volume (27 cubic feet = I cubic yard). Dredged Material - Material that is excavated or dredged from waters of the United States. Estuarine - River systems that extend upstream to an imaginary line that closes the mouth of the river, bay or sound. Generally, the term estuary refers to the portion of the river from the ocean to the point where the ocean salts are diluted by freshwater from either rivet currents or upland runoff. FPS - Feet per second. Fill Material -Any material that will change the bottom elevation of an aquatic area, wetland, or water body. Finger Pier - A small walkway generally built perpendicular to a pier for the purpose of providing access to and aid in mooring a boat. (Often referred to as a catwalk, L-head or T-head). Filter Cloth - A thin cloth-like material non-nally used behind bulkheads or riprap to retain fill material while allowing water to pass through it. General Permit -A Department of the Army (Corps) permit that is issued on a nationwide or regional basis for a category or categories of activities when the work is similar in nature and causes only minimal individual and cumulative environmental impacts. Groin - A structure built perpendicular to the shore whose main function is to trap and retain moving sediments. Intermittent Strewn - A stream that has flowing water at some times and is dry at other times. Intertidal Zone - The area of land that is submerged at high tide and exposed at low tide. Jetty - A structure, much like a groin, that is built alongside a channel or harbor entrance to prevent sand from building up in the channel and obstructing navigation. Jetties are seldom low profile since their main purpose is to maintain a channel opening. Joint Public Notice - A public notice that satisfies the advertising requirements of the Virginia State Water Control Board, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the Corps of Engineers. Linear Feet - The total footage of a structure measuring in a continuous line along the structure. Low Profile Groin - A groin design where the height of the structure is gradually lowered so the channelward end is below mean low water which allows sand to bypass the structure (once the structure is filled) so that beaches downdrift of the groin will still receive sand. Marina - Any installation operating under public or private ownership which provides mooring (not including paddle or rowboats), sale, rental, equipment, supply, or service for the convenience of the public or their leases, renters, or users of their facilities. Marsh Peat Surface - The surface of the area containing the roots of the wetland vegetation. Also referred to as the wetland substrate. Mean IEgh Water (MHW) - The average elevation of high water in tidal areas. Mean 11igh Water Line - A contour line on a drawing that shows the landward limits of an average high tide. Mean Low Water (MLW) - The average elevation of low water in tidal areas. Mean Low Water Line - A contour line on a drawing that shows the channelward limits of an average low tide. -60- MGD - Million gallons per day. Mudflats - Nearly level areas without vegetation that are covered during high water and exposed at low water. Nationwide Permit - Nationwide permits are a type of general permit that authorize certain specified activities nationwide. If certain conditions are met, the specified activity may be undertaken without the need for an individual or regional permit. Navigable Waters of the United States - Waters of the United States that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible to use for the transport of interstate or foreign commerce. Nontidal Waters -Waterways or impoundments not subject to the periodic rise and fall of the tide. Non-Vegetated Wetlands - State and Local Definition: The Commonwealth of Virginia has defined these areas as follows: Non-vegetated wetlands include the land lying between and contiguous to mean low water to an elevation of mean high water not otherwise considered "vegetated wetlands". Generally, this is any area between mean low water and mean high water which does not exhibit or support vegetation. These areas include mudflats, sand beaches, eroding shorelines, etc. Ordinary I-figh Water (OHW) - The average elevation of high water in nontidal areas. Ordinary ffigh Water Line - A contour line on maps of nontidal waterfront property that shows the landward limits of normal high water. Perennial Stream - A stream that has flowing water year round and is usually indicated by a solid blue line on U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps. Pre-Discharge Notification (PDN) - Notification required by the Corps of Engineers on specific projects that may meet the criteria of certain Nationwide Permits. Put & Take Trout Waters - Cool, clear, freshwater streams that are stocked with various species of trout. Regional Permit - Regional permits are a type of General Permit that may be issued by a division or district engineer for activities within a specific geographic area. Retaining wall - An upright structure built to prevent property from slumping into a waterway. Revetment - A facing, usually made of stone or concrete, installed to protect an eroding shoreline from the force of water. Riparian Rights - The rights of a person owning land bordering on a water body to reach navigable water. Riprap - A layer of material such as stone or chunks of concrete on an embankment slope to prevent erosion. Splash Apron - A structure that is usually made of riprap or concrete and placed at the outlet of a pipe to absorb the initial impact of the flow and reduce the flow velocity to a level which will not erode the receiving channel or area. Spur - A short structure, normally less than 20 feet in length, built perpendicular to a groin for the purpose of reducing erosion or scour downdrift of the groin. Square Feet - A measurement of area ( length x width = area), State Waters - All water, on the surface and under the ground, wholly or partially within its jurisdiction. Subaqueous Land - Land which is submerged below mean low water (channelward of the mean low water line) in tidal areas or below ordinary high water (channelward of the ordinary high water line) in nontidal areas. Tidal Waters - Waters subject to a periodic rise and fall in elevation caused by the moon and sun and occurring in a cyclic manner, normally every 12 hours. Trout waters - Cool, clear, freshwater streams that provide habitat for various species of trout. Trout cannot survive in waters warmer than 68 degrees. Vegetated Shallows - Shallow water areas that support submerged aquatic vegetation. Vegetated Wetlands - State and Local Definition: The Commonwealth of Virginia has defined these areas as follows: Vegetated wetlands include the land lying between and contiguous to mean low water to an elevation above mean low water equal to one and one-half times the mean tide range at the site of the proposed project and upon which one or more species of tidal wetland plants is growing. Generally, this is the land between and adjacent to the range of mean high water and mean low water which supports at least one species of wetland vegetation. This definition includes the land within one and one-half times the range of the average tide at the site. State and Local wetlands are limited to tidal areas of the commonwealth. Federal Definition - The Government of the United States has defined wetlands as follows: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Federal wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. It should be noted in many cases the federal definition of wetlands includes areas at higher elevation than one and one-half times the mean high tide range. Federal wetlands are not limited to tidal areas. _61- Vernal Pools - Pools that may only seasonally have standing water. Several endangered species are dependant on vernal pools for their reproduction and continued existence. Waters of the United States - Coastal (including territorial seas) and inland waters, lakes, rivers, and streams that are navigable waters of the United States, including adjacent wetlands. PLUS: Tributaries to navigable waters of the United States, including adjacent wetlands. (Man-made, nontidal drainage and irrigation ditches excavated from dry land, not from wetlands, are not considered to be tributaries.) PLUS: Interstate waters and their tributaries, including adjacent wetlands. -62- U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Norfolk District CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NORFOLK DISTRICT REGIONAL PERMIT RP-17 FOR PRIVATE PIERS hereby certify that I have read and understand all conditions of the effective Regional Permit RP-17, issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, Norfolk, Virginia, regulating the construction, maintenance, and repair of private, non-commercial piers & mooring piles in certain navigable waters of the United States within the Commonwealth of Virginia. The proposed (work) to be located at: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- fully complies with all conditions set forth in RP-17. I agree to make available a copy of this certification and any other documents required by RP-17 to any regulatory representative authorized to visit the project site to ensure permit compliance. If I fail to provide the required documentation upon request, I understand that the representative will have the option of stopping work at the project site until it has been determined that I am in full compliance with all terms and conditions set forth in the regional permit. ----------------------------------- Signature of Property Owner or Agent ------------------------------------ Date NOTE: DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM IF YOU ARE CONSTRUCTING A BULKHEAD, RIPRAP REVETMENT, OR PERFORMING ANY OTHER ACTIVITY NOT COVERED BY RP-17. DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RP-17. YOU MAY CONTACT THE CORPS AT (804) 441-7652 FOR A COPY OF THE PERMIT. NAO FL 17 Rev 30 APR 93 -63- ADDENDUM DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR VIRGINIA WATER PROTECTION PERMITS The following information is required for all applications unless otherwise noted: 1. � 62.1-44.15:3 of State Water Control Law requires that before the Department may consider any application for a permit to be complete, that the applicant provide the Executive Director with a notification from the local governing body of the county, city or town in which the discharge is to take place that the location and operation of the facility is fully consistent with all ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 (� 15.1427 et seq.) of Title 15.1. A form for local government signature is included with this appendix. Please note that the local governing body must be presented with the Joint Permit Application. Failure to fulfill this requirement will prevent processing of your application and may result in the administrative denial of your request. 2. 3. Latitude: Hydrologic Longitude: Unit Code (HUC) * This information is found on the Hydrologic Unit Map - State of Virginia published by the U.S. Geological survey. 4. Stream Classification (Check one) - Class I - Open Ocean Class 11 - Estuarine Waters Class III - Nontidal Waters Class IV - Mountainous Zone Waters Class V - Put & Take Trout Class VI - Natural Trout Waters Waters Class VII - Swamp Waters 5. Stream Drainage Area (check whichever applies) a. -<I square mile b. -<5 square miles c. ->5 square miles "Note: Applicants proposing impoundments and water withdrawals may be required to provide more detailed hydrologic information (see section 11) 6. Existing beneficial uses of affected waters (check all that apply)***: fish and wildlife habitat recreation - public water supply agriculture water supply - commercial /industrial supply waste assimilation - navigation cultural value - aesthetic value other (please describe) 7. Uses which may be impacted by the proposed project (check only those uses impacted) fish and wildlife habitat recreation public water supply agriculture water supply commercial /industrial supply waste assimilation navigation cultural value aesthetic value other (please describe) 'Note: More detailed information on beneficial uses may be required for specific projects. Applicants will be notified, in writing, of any additional requirements. Al - 8. Functional values assessment (wetlands only): Functional assessments are required for impacts (permanent and temporary) to all wetlands one acre or more in size. Many recognized functional assessment methodologies exist. However, the DEQ endorses no specific methodology at this time. It is suggested that an applicant or his agent select a method based upon its ease of use, ability to provide quality information, and utility in the field. Applicants are cautioned that the assessment of wetland functional value is technically complex. Persons unfan-dliar with the techniques for functional assessment should use caution when attempting to utilize these methods. The functional assessment and the methodology utilized to determine functional value must be submitted to the DEQ with the application package. 9. Wetland delineation (where applicable) : All projects impacting wetlands must provide a delineation map showing the physical location and aerial extent of all wetlands on the site. All data sheets and calculations utilized to determine an area's wetland status shall be submitted with the delineation map. The currently accepted federal methodology shall be used in preparing wetland delineations. 10. Mitigation Plan (required for unavoidable wetland losses and stream modifications): The mitigation plan shall at a minimum include: a. Measures taken to avoid impacts to surface waters, including wetlands. F,xample 1 : Structures were relocated to avoid wedand/stream relocation area's identified at X and Y on the delineation map. Example 2: The road crossing structure has been changed from a quadruple box culvert to a bridge in order to avoid fill and channel modifications in Jones Branch, a sensitive trout stream. b. Where impacts could not be avoided, measures taken to reduce impacts to surface waters, including wetlands. Example 1: The slope of the road fill was reduced to x resulting in a reduction of y in wetland area impacted. Example 2: The bridge was realigned to reduce the amount of channelization necessary to accommodate the road crossing. c. Where impacts could not be avoided or minimized, a mitigation plan which completely describes the type of impact to be mitigated and the means by which mitigation will be accomplished. Plans should include: � Location of the mitigation site, including latitude and longitude at the center of the site. � detailed sketches and site plans � any other measures designed to re-create, enhance or restore impacted beneficial uses within the proposed mitigation area. If no replacement mitigation is planned, the applicant must include a brief statement to this effect and include a detailed explanation as to the reason no replacement mitigation is planned. **** Note: Applicants with projects involving a water withdrawal or a FERC hydropower licensing or relicensing are required to provide the information in items 11 through 19. A2 - 11. Applicants must complete Appendix N - Stream Intakes and Outfall Structures, Appendix 0 - Stream Channel Modifications and/or Appendix P - Impoundments /Dams, whichever is (are) appropriate. 12. What are the median monthly stream flows in cubic feet per second (cfs) at the water intake or dam site? Median Flow Median Flow Month LC F -51 51 Month LQF JAN ----- JUL ----- FEB ----- AUG ----- MAR SEP ----- APR OCT ----- MAY ----- NOV ----- JUN ----- DEC ----- 13. Describe below or on an attachment the strearnflow gauges, the type of calculations used and the period of record that was used to calculate the median monthly flows in item 12, and the average flows provided in Appendices N, 0 and P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 14. What is the maximum instantaneous withdrawal and maximum daily withdrawal at the water intake or dam site? Specify the units of measurement, e.g. million gallons per day, gallons per minute, cubic feet per second, etc. Maximum instantaneous withdrawal Maximum daily withdrawal 15. Describe the manner in which the withdrawal of water varies over time, for example, as a function of the time of year, or time of day, or time of week. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16. Describe below the amount of water that will be lost to consumptive use. For the purpose of this application, consumptive use means the withdrawal of surface waters without recycle of said waters to their source or basin of origin. Attach a map showing the location of the withdrawal and location of the return flow. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17. Describe below or in a separate attachment how the amount of water to be withdrawn was calculated and any relevant assumptions made in that calculation. Also describe the proposed use of the water withdrawal. - A3 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18. Describe in an attachment the existing beneficial uses of the surface water body near the proposed project site that would be affected by the withdrawal of water. Include both instream and offstream uses. For the purposes of this application beneficial instream uses include, but are not limited to, the protection of fish and wildlife habitat, maintenance of waste assimilation, recreation, navigation and cultural and aesthetic values. Offstream beneficial uses include, but are not limited to, domestic (including public water supply), agricultural, hydropower, commercial and industrial uses. Describe the strean-tflow necessary to protect existing beneficial uses and how the proposed withdrawal will impact existing beneficial uses. 19. Describe in an attachment the aquatic life known to be present at the proposed location that will be impacted by the proposed withdrawal. Include information on the species known to be present and their habitat requirements. A4 - TO: Applicants For Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) Permits, Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) Permits, Virginia Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Permits and Virginia Water Protection Permits. Article 2, � 62.1-44.15:3 of the State Water Control Law states: "No application for a Certificate to discharge sewage, industrial wastes and other wastes into or adjacent to state waters shall be considered complete unless the applicant has provided the Executive Director with notification from the governing body of the county, city or town in which the discharge is to take place that the location and operation of the discharging facility is consistent with all ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 (� 15.1-427 et seq.) of Title 15.1 of the Code." (These are local zoning and planning ordinances) In accordance with'this section, new applications for VPA permits, VPDES Permits, CAP Permits and Virginia Water Protection Permits will not be considered complete until the information below is submitted to the DEQ Regional office or Headquarters office in the case of the Virginia Water Protection Permits. To: (County, City or Town Administrator/Manager) I am in the process of completing a DEQ application form for a permit or certificate. In accordance with Chapter 11 (�15.1-427 et seq.) of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia, I request that you sign one of the two statements below certifying my attached application is consistent with your local ordinances. Please return this form to: Return to: (Applicant's Name) (Applicant's Address) I hereby certify, - (1) that the proposed location and operation of the facility is consistent with all ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 (�15.1-427 et seq.) of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia or - (2) That no local ordinances are in effect pursuant to Chapter 11 (�lS.1-427 et seq.) Signature Title Print name Date - A5 - How to calculate square feet, cubic feet and cubic yards: If you wanted to dredge a channel 100 feet long, 20 feet wide and 5 feet deeper than the existing channel is at mean low water, the volume you dredge would look similar to the illustration below. 100, 51 20' =02 W Using steps 1 - 3 below, the calculations for this example are: 1. 100 feet x 20 feet = 2,000 square feet 2. 5 feet x 2,000 feet 10,000 cubic feet 3. 10,000 cubic feet /27 = 370 cubic yards P, EXHIBIT C VIRGINIA Permit Co !j C Commonwealth of Virginia Marine Resources Commission Authorization A Permit has been issued to: (Name) (Address) The Permit Authorizes Issuance Date Expiration Date (Commissioner or Designee) (Notary Public) (Commission Expires) This Notice Must Be Conspicuously Displayed At Site Of Work EXHIBIT D Virginia Marine Resources Commission Habitat Management Division 2600 Washington Avenue Post Office Box 756 Newport News VA 23607-0756 Attenticin: Environmental Engineer SirlMadam: Please be advised that Z will commence work on on (Permit NuRFe-r) (Date) in (Watorway) (CIty1county) X expect-the work to be completed no later than (Dat*) (Name of Permittee) Note: Return postage Is on the card. i A EXHIBIT E ASSOCIATE MEMBERS SIDNEY H. CAMDEN Eastvitte. Virginia GEORGE S. FORREST Poquoson, Virginia JOHN W. FREEMAN, SR. Hampton, Virginia WILLIAM A- PRUITT TIMOTHY G_ HAYES Commissioner Richmond, Virginia ROBERT 0. CRAFT COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA WILLIAM A. HUDNALL Chief. Administration and Finance Marine Resources ornmission Heathsville, Virginia ROBERT W. GRABB DONALD L LIVERMAN, SR. Chief, Habitat Management P. 0. Box 756 Virginia Beach, Virginia ROBERT J. MARKLAND PETER W. ROWE Chief, Law Enforcement 2600 Washington Avenue Chesapeake, Virginia JACK G. TRAVELSTEAD JANE C. WEBB Chief. Fisheries Management Newport News, Virginia 23607-0756 Newport News, Virginia October 15, 1993 Mr. Mark A. Bruner c/o Tidewater Dock, Inc. P. 0. Box 2733 Virginia Beach, Va. 23450 RE: VMRC #93-1056 Dear Sir: Enclosed is the Marine Resources Commission permit to install 233 linear feet of riprap revetment no more than three feet channelward of mean low water at property situated along Linkhorn Bay in Virginia Beach. A yellow placard is also enclosed. This placard reflects the authorized activities for inspection purposes and must be conspicuously displayed at the work site throughout the construction phase. Failure to properly post the placard in a prominent location will be considered a violation of your permit conditions. The work authorized by this permit is to be completed by October 31, 1996. Please note that in conformance with Special Condition 17 of your permit you are to notify the Commission prior to commencement of your permitted project. The enclosed self-addressed, stamped post card is to be used for this purpose. All other conditions of the permit will remain in effect. Please be advised that you may also require issuance of a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers permit before you begin work on this project. You may wish to contact them directly to verify any permitting requirements. Sinc@@elyr 'fZobert W. Grabb Chief, Habitat Management RWG/lm HM Enclosure CC: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District Virginia Beach Wetlands Board Applicant Telephone (804) 247-2200 (804) 247-2292 V/TDD Information and Emergency Hotline 1-800-541-4646 V/TDD 93-1056 MRC 30 - 317 vml@cfi Applicanti -Mark A. Bruner COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION PERMIT The Commonwealth of Virginia; Marine Resources Commission, hereinafter referred to as the Commission, on this 5 t h day of 0 c t o b e r 199 3, hereby grants unto: Mark A. Bruner 1537 Quail Point Road Virginia Beach, VA 23454 hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, permission to: El Encroach in, on, or over State-owned subaqueous bottoms pursuant to Chapter 12, Subti de 111, of Tide 28.2 of the Code of Virginia. E] Use or develop'tidal wetlands pursuant to Chapter 13, Subtitle 111, of Title 282 of the Code of Virginia. Permittee is hereby authorized to: install 233 linear feet of riprap revetment no more than three feet channelward of mean low water at property situated along Linkhorn Bay in Virginia Beach. All activities authorized herein shall be accomplished in conformance with plans and drawings dated Sept ember 23, 1993, which am attached and made a part of this permit This permit is granted subject to the following conditions: (1) Thework authorized by this permit shall be completed byo C t ob er 31., 1996 The Permittee shall notify the Commission when the project is completed. The completion date may be extended by the Commission in its discretion. Any such application for extension of time shall be in writing prior to the above completion date and shall specify the reason for such extension and the expected date of completion of construction. All other conditions remain in effect until revoked by the Commission or the General Assembly. (2) Ibis permit grants no authority to the Permittee to encroach upon the property rights, including riparian rights of others. (3) The duly authorized agents of the Commission shall have the right to enter upon the premises at reasonable times, for the purpose of inspecting the work being done pursuant to this permit. (4) The Permittee shall comply with the waterquality standards as established by the Virginia Water Control Board and all other applicable laws, or- dinances, rules and regulations affecting the conduct of the project. The granting of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibil- ity of obtaining any and all other permits or authority for the projects. (5) This permitshall not be transferred without written consent of the Commissioner. (6) This permitshall not affect or interfere with the right vouchsafed to the people of Virginia concerning fishing, fowling and the catching of and taking of oysters and othershellfish in and from the bottom of acres and waters not included within the terms of this permit (7) The Permitteeshall, to the, greatest extent practicable, minimize the adverse effects of the project upon adjacent properties and wedands and upon the na tura I resou rces of the Go in monweal th. (8) Th is perm i t m ay be revoked a t a ny t i me by the Com m ission upon th e fai lure of the Perm i t tee to com ply wi th any of the term s a nd cond itions he reof or a t the wil I of th e Gen era I Assembly of M rgi ni a. (9) There is express ly excl uded from the perm it any porti on of th e wa ters wi thi n th e bo u nda ries of the Baylor S u rvey. (10) This permit is subject to any lease of oyster planting ground in effect on the date of this permit. Nothing in this permit shall be construed as at- lowing the Permittee to encroach on any lease without the consent of the leaseholder. The Permittee shall be liable for any damages to such lease. (11) The issuance of this permit does not confer upon the Permittee any interest or title to the beds of the waters. (12) All structures authorized by this permit which are not maintained in good repair shall be completely removed from State-owned bottom within three (3) mouths after notification by the Commission. (13) The Permittee agrees to comply with all of die terms and conditions as set forth in this permit and that the project wilt be accomplished within the boundaries as outlined in the plans attached hereto. Any encroachment beyond die limits of this permitshall constitute a Class 1 misde- meanor. (14) This permit authorizes no claim to archaeological arlifacts which may be encountered during the course of construction. If, however, archae- ological remains are encountered, the Permittee agrees to notify the Commission, who will, in turn notify the Department of Historic Resources. The Permi ttee further agrees to cooperate with agencies of the Commonwealth in the recovery of archaeological mmains if deemed necessary. (15) The Permittee, agrees to i ndemni@y and save harmless the Commonwealth of Vrgi nia from any liabili ty a rising from the estabi ishment, opera- tion or maintenance of said project. PERMITTEE - WHITE COPY COMMISSION -YELLOW COPY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - PINK COPY VMRCV 93-1056 fo(lowing specia( conditions are imposed on this permit 16. The yellow placard accompanying this permit document must be conspicuously displayed at the work site throughout the construction phase of the authorized activity. 17. Permittee agrees to notify the Commission a minimum of 15 days prior to the start of construction of the activities authorized by this permit. PERM(TTEE-WHITE COPY COMMISSION-YELLOW COPY CORPS OF ENGINEERS-PINK COPY VMRC44 93-1056 A permit issuing lee of $25.00 and a royalty of n / a forthe installation of 233 linear feet of riprap revetment for a total of $25.00 is due and payable upon return of this document signed by the Permittee. This permit consists of 12 sheets. PERMITTEE Permittee's signature is affixed hereto as evidence of acceptance of all of the terms and conditions herein. In cases where the Permittee is a corporation, agency or political jurisdiction, please assure that the individual who signs for the Permittee has proper authorization to bind the organization to the financial and performance obligations which result from activity authorized by this permit PERMITTEE Marl r Acc pled @Z A.,, Br"e day of re (Nar6) (Title) State of City (04`_@) of kc- to-wit 1, 5). "" a Notary Public in and for said City (or County) and State hereby certify that 0- , C_ Permittee, whose name is signed to the foregoing, has acknowledged the same before me in my City (or County) and State aforesaid. ;JL Given under my hand this // day of Ire 4L . 19 9 Notary Public My commission expires on the 314 Iday of C 19 ?q COMMISSION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Marine Resources Commission has caused these presents to be executed in its behalf by Robert W. Grabb Chief, Habitat Management (Name) (Title) MARINE RE@PURCES COMMISSION 5th day of October 19 93 By State of Virginia cityof Newport News to-wit, Linda L. Musser a No taryIpublic within and for said City, State of Virginia, hereby certify that Robert W. Grabb whose name is signed to the foregoing, bearing the 5th dayof October 1993 has acknowledged the same before me in my City aforesaid. Given under my hand this 15 th day of 0 c t o b e r '19 93 Notary Public My commission expires on the 3 1 S t dayof March '19 96 PERMITTEE-WH(TE COPY COMMISSION-YELLOW COPY CORPS OF ENGINEERS-PINK COPY JOB SITE MARK A- BRUNER 1537 QUAIL POINT RD- VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 234S4 Bird Neck Pr t1A B 2ya y HAL ynnhayen, S 11 An I glmd rn al 't% + neral A vi a Me Dep 0 I @ Q k;@R IE F1 0 ! 61" 0 NN C@u C3 S .3n11xu IV" KA' 0 12, (n 17 SQUAREI LA N ?Nkck (Cl o6v -%YDIISv -@tDl I SV.A m 0 CPO Hilltop "tt- E G East -1 @@ff@fo-rl Shop Ctro I-SY,114 '0ZLE i G d 4TH ST,\,6f, f'j4OR 'A iend Mteting; (@IqKnorfl "U1 CT@ AUTO a PFUNCI FIR 5@u "@'CT WELCOME so b Hilltop f, ULZBI Ac@3-t 'A Zbop C OCEAN As "I'll LAT AND LL[ A -f-) SCALE: 2,000' C( ADCS STREET MAP OF PURPOSE: EROSION CONTROL TIDEWATER IN: LINKHORN BAY DATUM: M-L.W- 0-00 VIRGINIA AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJACENT PROPERTY CWNERS: MAP 14 C=: VIRGINIA BEACH 1) GRAY N- allRNER GRID BLOCK C-7 STATE-VIRGINIA 2) DAVID H. ADA1MS APPLICATION BY: PROPOSED SHORELINE MARK A- BRUNER PROTECTIOU Sl-=- 1 OF 9 DATE:7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 REVISED 8-27-93 LINKHORN BAY F1,00D ME OF APPROX. 1 , SOO' EBB REP-RAP ACROSS WA=WAY MEAN LOW WATER K L. 1q. TOE OF BANK AND - _'f " 3_ ;0 I,T,thli HIQi WATE@, 3 6 7 f D Fl 1-17@RSH 'Pic APO ii Apo I CaMIROL ',-@ODDED LOT POIN-is 4 vAiRICUS rilf PES OF, TREF-S P_ND SHPUBS Cy 20' SIDEYARD LIMIT'S OF SETIPACY, OCNSTRUCTIaN NSTRUCTMI P.=S -c@ 3-,@- .3's 20' [email protected] ty cu SEMAG( A. 59. 5' R. 69' B. 45.5' C. 31' 1 ' 16' D. 37' 2. 25.5' aTrIRE PROJ= E. 59.S 3. 28' @ITE IS I-T=aq THE F. 69' 4. 32' LAN@-@ARD LI14IT OF G. 73' 5. IS.S' BUFFER 11. 89, 6. 10.5' 1- 71' 7. 19' vo J- 55' 8. K. 47.5 I-IATCHLINE 9. 13 L. S3' 10. 24 M. 70.5' 11. N. 40' AL C. TH 0. 63' NO P_ 75' 9.68'3 Q_ 70.S SCALE: V PURPOSE: EROSION DAILM: M.L.W_ 0.00 PLAN VIEW Dq: LIMIORN ADJAC@a,@`r PRCTyf@jm C@,TZERS: AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD I) GRAY N. TURNER CITY: VIRGINIA BEAC11 2) DAVID li. ADAmS Sn=:VIRGlN-IA APPLTCATICN BY: @@Flk PROPOSED _`U KXZEEJ3@E- W@RK A - BRUNER r 2 01-7 9 DATE: 7 2 3 9 3 REVISED 8-27-93 MATCHLINE 34- '14 Q1 20' SIDEYARD APO I SETBACK APO II 00. <e 71 IZ J. .4z 'A L C. T IST-1111 C/ No. 9683 L SCALE: 1" 50' PURPOSE: EROSION CONTROL PLAN VIEW T-N-- LINKHORN BAY DATUM: M.L.W- 0.00 AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJACENr PROPERTY" OIWTU@: CITY: VIRGINIA BEACH I @"K -- 1) GRAY N- TURNER SMTE:VIRGINIA 2) DAVID H. ADAMS APPLICATION BY: PROPOSED SHORELINE MARK A- BRUNER SlffiST 3 OF 9 DATE: 7/23/93 RE\i-j3ED: 8/18/93 4' TALL SILT FEtKE Sll@T FENkM B. +6-00' SLOPE 2*:l' PLACED AT LDlrrS OF OOKSMUMCN PFC)POSED CURLADDE CLASS I RIP RAP EXISTIM GRADE PIN 1 FILL FRCM UPLAND SOURCE M-H,W, +2,00' FILTER CE01H M..L4W- 0.00, MARSH OCRE AREA TO BE EXCAVATED (MATERIALS TO BE HAULED SECTION VIEW SCALE 1/8"1 FILL TO EZ PLACED I TO 121 TO AN UPLAND DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 1 LANDWARD FROM TOP OF BANK 4' TALL SILT FENCE TEMP. SILT FV')CE SLOPE 2'-J' PLACED AT LIMM PROPOSED GRADE OF CONSIRUCTION T.0.B. +6.00, CLASS I RIP RAP FILL FRom UpLAM SOURCE pDi 2 EXIST-D@c GR&DE' GRADE M.H.W- +2_00' FILTER CWTH M.L-W- 0-00' CORE STCt@E AREA TO BE EXCAVATED (MATERIALS TO BE HAULED SECTION VIEK FIIL To BE PLACED I To 12' TO AN UPLAM DISPO&kL SITE) PIN 2 LANDWARD FROM TOP OF BANK 4' TALL SILT FENCE TEMP. SILT FTI)CE PLACED AT LIMITS SLOPE 2'-l' OF OCNSMUCTI0N T.O.B. +6.00' GRAD CLASS; I RIP RAP PIN 3 M.H.W- +2.00- j FILTER CLOTH M-L.W. 0-00, DaSTING GRADE TH'. JR. "'oy No. 41 C) f"k vin VTT-w -12 (MAA HAULED -pD 1 3 70 BE PI@ACED TO TO AN UPLAM DISPOSAL SITE) IA@ FIZU-1 TOP OF BANK PURPOSE: EROSION CONTROL SECTION VIEWS IN: LINKHORN RAY DATUM: M.L.W. 0.00 AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: Pl, P2 and P3 CITY: VIRGINIA BEACH 1) GRAY N- TUPdqER STATE,.VIRGINT-A 2) DAVID H, ADAMS APPLICATION 13Y: sTcm PROPOSED SFKXZELINE MARK A- BRUNER PROTDMON -SIRMT 4 OF 9 DATE: 7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 REVISED 8-27-93 SMPE 2' 4' TALL SMT FE11CE TEMP- SILT FENCE PLACED AT JIMITS or CIONSTRUCTIal T.O.B. +6.00, CL.ASS I RIP RAP GRADE PIN 4 F7ILTER CWTH M-H.W. +2.00' OCCE S7U\TE M.L.W. 0.00' E)a AREA TO BE EXCAVATED FlIL 70 BE PLACED 1 70 'l 2 . (MATERIALS 70 BE HAULED SECTION ViE7,7 SCALE 1/8" TO AN UPLAND DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 4 LANDelARD FROM TOP OF BANK TEMP. SILT FENCE 4' TALL SILT FENCE Q@QPE 2': 1 PLACED AT 1,IMITS OF CONSTRUCTION T.O.B. +6.00' PROPOSED GaRlADE CIASS I RIP RAP FILTER CL= F M-H.W. +2.00' CCRE STONE PIN 5 M.L.W. 0-00' EXISTING GRADE AREA TO BE EXCAVATED (MATERIALS TO BE HAULED SECT`IOtq VIEW SCALE 1/8" FUL To EE PLACED 1 70 12' TO AN UPLAND DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 5 IANDwARD FROM 70P OF BANK 4' TALL SILT FENCE TEMP- SILT FENCE SLOPE 2'-l' PLACED AT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTICN T-O.B. +6-00' CIASS I RIP RAP PR FILTER t M-H-W. +2-00' --,.0OPE STL-NE PIN 6 M.L-W. C. NO. 0' EXISTING GRADE .10 -5@ 9683TVA AREA TO BE EXCAVATED TO BE CED- ATERIALS 710 BE HAULED SEMON VIEM SCALE 1/8" LAND@ZARD fl@CM TOP OF BANK AN UPLAND DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 6 PURPOSE: EROSION C@ONTMROL IN: LINKHORN BAY DATUM: M.L.W. 0.00 SECTION VIEWS AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: P4, P5 and P6 CITY: VIRGINIA BEACH 1) GRAY N- TURNER STATE:VIRGINTA PROPolso @Alll@ STING GRADE APPLICATION BY: MARK A- BRUNER PROPOSED SjjOiZU,1--NE PR(nBMOa -,IUIEFT 5 OF 9 DATE: 7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 REVISED 8-27-93 SLOPE 1 5 4' TALL SILT FEENCE SI-LT FENCE PLACED AT LIKITS OF cotLmucucN PROPCGM <sRADE T-O-D- +6-00' FILL FROM UPLAln SOURCE FILTER CLOTH CLASS I R-IP RAP CCRF STCNE M.H-W- +2.00' PiN 7 M.L.W. 0.00' E)asTim GRADE A-RXA TO BE E(CAVA-M) TO BE KkULED SEMON VTLW SCAJ_E 1/8"- FILL TO BE PLACED i TO 12 0 DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 7 LA14MARD FRal TOP OF pANK TO AN UPL-11'r 4' T-'J-L SILT M)C--- TE@iP- SMT Fl@,)CE O-@OPE 2': 1 PLACED AT LIlMaTS OF CONSTRUCTICN FROPOS=M GRIP0E T.O.B. +6.00' CLASS I RI P RAP FILL FRCM UPLA!M SC(j-K-Z----- PIN 8 M.H.w F-M= 0-0-Di +2.00' CO3.lE STCNE M.L.W. 0.00' S=TR)G ARFA TO 2E L-XCAVATED FILL 70 U PLACED I TO 12' (PATOUALS -10 BE H,%ULED SECI'ICN VIEW SCALE 1 /8" LAN'DdARD FROti 70P OF PANK TO AN UPLAMD DISPOS-A.L SITE) PIN 8 4' TALL SILT m.@= T&MP. SILT MKE SLOPE 2': 1 PLACED AT LIMITS OF c0cls-MUMON PROPOSED GRADE- CLASS I Rl-P RAP T.O.B. +6.00' FRCM-@WIJIVD Sl-)URCE A'- PIN 9 EXI=G CR7,DE M.H.W. 2.00' FILTER CIJDDi M.L.W. 0_001 CCRE Sqla E -D D R A W 1 r",, 5@ mpsH p 1 o i-FUD E, ED FILL To BE PLACED 1 TO 12' SDMON VIEW MATEPLIALS' BE HAULED FRCtj TOP OF BANY 70 AN UPLAND DISF40SAL SrrE) PIN 9 LANDRRD PURPOSE: EROSION COlql'ROL-[ IN: LINKHORN BAY DAaT-N: M.L.W- 0.00 SECrION VIEWS AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJACENT PROPEJZrY OWNERS: P7, P8 and P9 (aTY: VIRGINIA BEACH 1) GRAY N- IURNER STATE:VIRGINIA lp, 2) DAV-ID 11- ADAMS, APPLICATION BY: moposm Sl XXZE@, MARK A- BRUNER PRCfI=-f CN Sl=- 6 OF 9 DATE: -7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 REVISED 8-27-93 4' TALL SILT FENCE PROPOSED GRADE STDPE 2': 1 PLACED AT LIMITS OF Oct'tSm=Orq TEKP_ SILT FElKE ------- T.O.B. +6., 00, CLASS I RIP RAP PIN 10 FILL FROM UPLAND SOURCE M-H.W. +2.00' FILTER M.L-W. 0-00' b3EZE SIONE MARSH EXISTING GRADE AREA 70 BE EXCAVATED (MATERIALS 10 BE HAULED SEMON VIEW SCALE 1/8" = I' FILL TO BE PIACn) I TO 12' TO AN UPLAND DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 10 LANIXWD FRCM 70P OF BANK 4' TALL SILT FENCE SILT FEZKM I RIP PAP: PLACED AT LIPaTS PRO GRADE- OF COasTRLK_'rIc(q SLOPE 2':l' T.O.B. +6.0 PIN 11 SWPE 2': 1 MARSH FILL FROM UPLAND SOURCE "'Z M.H-W. +2.00' FILTER CL17M CORE SICKE M.L-W. 0-00, EXISTING Q fD -j AIREA TO BE EXCAVATED F-fLL To BE PLAM:) 170 12' (MATERIALS TO BE HAULED SEMON VTEW SCALE 1/8" IANWARD FRCm 710P OF BANK TO AN UPLAND DISPOSAL S PIN 11 4' TALL SILT M41CE TaT. SILT F13KE SLopE 2':l' PLACED AT LIMITS PROPOSED GRADE OFca\L-,fRUCTIOt4 T.O.B_ +6.00' c- CIASS I RIP PAP Fl:l SOURCE M-H.W. +2.00' IG ExISTIN GRADE M-L-W. 0.00, 'k FILTER CI)G`IlL.____ - - c. PIN 12 NO. L7.3 -e P! 963fll z AREA, BE- FILL To BE PLACED 1 710 12' BE HAULED SECTION VIEW SCALE 1/8" IANDKhM FRCm TOP OF BANK DISPOSAL SITE) PIN 12 IN: LINKHORN BAY PURPOSE: EROSION CONTROL SECTION VIEWS AT: 1537 QUAIL'POINT ROAD DAIL": M.L.W_ 0.00 caTy: VIRGINIA BEACH ADJACEW PROPElZlY OWtUM: Plo, Pil and P12 s-L=-VIRGINIA 1) CRAY N_ TURNER 2) DAVID H_ ADAMS APPLICATION BY: PROPOS'ED _':@[ KXZELII@LE MAR-K A- BRUNER. PFJIOT@GN an= 7 OF 9 DATE: 7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 GENERAL NOIES: I A 4' TALL SILT FENCE WILL BE PLACED AND MAINTAINED ALONG ALL ACCESSWAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY ODNSTRUCTION. 2) TREES THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED ARE TAGGED WITH PINK SURVEY RIBBON. 3) SAND FILL TO BE FROM UPLAND SOURCE. 4) ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TOPSOIT AND SEEDED. 5) A SILT FENCE WILL INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF BANK, AND MAINTAINED UNTILL A PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. 6) ALL MATERIAL IS To BE USED IN ACCORDANCE-WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S REC@,)ATIONS. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: 1 INSTALL A 4 'PALL SILT FENCE ALONG ACCESSWAYS ---------- 1 DAY 2) REMOVE DEBRIS FROM SHORELINE -------------------------- 4 DAYS 3) REMOVE TAGGED TREES ----------------------------------- 2 DAYS 4) EXCAVATE TOE-IN-TRENCH A14D RESHAPE SHORELINE ---------- 5 DAYS 5) INSTALL FILTER CLOTH AND LAY RIP-RAP ------------------ 2 WEEKS 6) REMOVE SILT FENCE, ESTABLISH PERENNIAL VBGITATIVE COVER OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS ------------------------ 2 DAYS PURPOSE: EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES IN: LINKHORN BAY DATUM: M.L-W. 0-00 AND AT: 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJAC]a@ PROPEF= OWNERS: SEQUENCE OF EVENTS CITY: VIRGINIA BEACH 1) GRAY N_ TURNER STATE:VIRGINIA 2) DAVID H - ADAMS APPLICATION BY: PROPOSED SIK)RELINE MARK A- BRUNER PROTE)CTION SHEOr 8 OF 9 DATE: 7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 SITE SPECIFIC SEEDING MIXTURES FOR COASTAL PLAIN AREA Total Lbs. Per Am- Minimum Care Lawn - Commercial or Residential - Kentucky 31 or Turf-Type Tall Fescue 175-200 lbs. or - Common Bermudagrass 75 lbs. High Maintenance Lawn. - Kentucky 31 or Turf-Type Tall Fescue 200-250 lbs. or - Hybrid Bermudagrass (seed) 40 lbs. (unhulled) or 30 lbs.(hulled) - Hybrid Bermudagrass (by other vegetative establishment method, sec Std. & Spec. 3.34) General Slope (3:1 or less) - Kentucky 31 Fescue 128 lbs. - Red Top Grass 2 lbs. - Seasonal Nurse Crop 20 lbs. 150 lbs. Low Maintenance Slope (SteeperThan 3:1) - Kentucky 31 Tall Fescue 93-108 lbs. - Common Bermudagrass 0-15 lbs. - Red Top Grass 2 lbs. - Seasonal Nurse Crop 20 lbs. - Sericea Lespedeza 20 lbs, 150 lbs. Use seasonal nurse crop in. accordance with seeding dates as stated below: February, March through April ............... Annual Rye May Is( through August .................... Foxtail Millet September, October through November 15th ..... Annual Rye November 16th through January . ............. Winter Rye May through October, use hulled seed. All other seeding periods, use unhulled seed. Weeping Lovgrass may be added to any slope or low- maintenance, mix during warmer seeding periods-, add 10-20 lbs./acre in mixes. PURPOSE: EROSION CONTROL SEEDING IN: LINKHORN BAY DATUM: M.L.W. 0.00 SCHEDULE AT-- 1537 QUAIL POINT ROAD ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: City: VIRGINIA BEACH 1) GRAY N. TURNER STATE.VIRGINIA 2) DAVID H- ADAMS APPLICATION BY: PROPOSED SHORELINE MARK A- BRUNER PROTECTION SHEET 9 OF 9 DATE: 7/23/93 REVISED: 8/18/93 REVISED 8-27-93 - I A;j ioh EXHIBIT F PROJECT COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT VMRC# ENGINEER SITE VISIT DATE/TIME OTHERS PRESENT 1. Permittee 2. Location (Waterway) (City/County) 3. Project Description 4. Project Completed? YES NO 5. Date of Permit Expiration (VMRC) (LWB) 6. Project Dimensions as Permitted 7. Project Dimensions as Constructed 8. Can Permit Compliance be Determined? If no, explain. 9. Degree of Permit Compliance: In Compliance Moderate Out of Compliance 10. Additional Comments 11. Contractor? 12 Pictures Taken? YES NO 4 1 . , I NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CTR LIBRARY I 1 3 6668 14111711 1