[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
Oct Coastal Zone i Information Center COASTAL ITS JO 111971 INFORMATION CUREI CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDIES P PREPARED BY INTERDEPARTMENTAL AD HOC TASK GROUP FOR COMMITTEE ON MULTIPLE USE OF THE COASTAL ZONE @NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR MARINE RESOURCES AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APRIL 1968 REVISED NOVEMBER 1968 HE 553 C66 1968 CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDIES MEMBERS OF THE AD HOC TASK GROUP Brig General Charles C. Noble, Chairman representing Lt General William F. Cassidy, Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army Rear Admiral Harley D. Nygren, Environmental Science Services Administration, Department of Commerce Rear Admiral R. W. Goehring, U. S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation Working Representatives of Agencies Assigned to Drafting_Report (Full Time 8 February thru 22 March 19681 Department of the Army: T. R. Doran, Staff, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors Department of Commerce: D. D. Allen, Maritime Administration Department of Transportation: Capt. John Doherty, U. S. Coast Guard CONTRIBUTING FEDERAL AGENCIES Department of Commerce Property of (',"C Library Department of the Interior Department of State Department of Health, Education and Welfare Department of Defense J@ Department of Transportation Department of Housing and Urban@Development National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Science and Technology Smithsonian Institution CIO Atomic Energy Commission U - S . DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOAA 1-0 COASTAL SERVICES ("ENTER 2234 SOUTH HOHON AVENUE CHARLESTON , SC ?q409-2413 Cb TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page INTRODUCTION I SCOPE 2 ACTIVITIES 3 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES 4 COORDINATION 4 ORGANIZATION 5 SCHEDULE 6 COSTS 7 Exhibits I - Planning Matrix of Principal Subjects and Participating Agencies II - Conceptual Organization Chart III - PERT Diagram (Critical Path Network) and Tabulated Time Schedule by Activities IV - Funding Allocation Matrix (Illustrative) APPENDIX A. Glossary of Principal Subjects and Agency Functions CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDIES INTRODUCTION The broad purpose of comprehensive harbor and port development studies would be to develop and provide information for those concerned with Federal, local, public, and private investments in such developments. The overall objective of the studies would be to provide for the best use, or combination of uses, of water and related land facilities to meet contem- porary and long-range needs for safe, efficient, and convenient water transportation at the lowest practicable cost in a manner consistent with other national goals and objectives. Studies.pertaining to the develop- ment of a regionis harbors must be definitive and yet leave sufficient flexibility so that formulated plans can be modified or adjusted over time to fit changing conditions. The studies must provide detailed analyses of, and recommend solutions for, specific problems generated by rapidly changing transportation and cargo-handling technology and by conflicting demands for the development, utilization, and conservation of marine resources. A major objective of the comprehensive study would be consideration of alternative solutions, taking into account costs and effects on economic, environmental and social structures. Specific study objectives might include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Determination of the optimum number, type, and spacing of deep- draft harbors which will be required for prospective foreign and domestic waterborne commerce. b. Development of practical economic solutions to problems imposed by rapidly changing vessel and cargo-handling technology including identification and evaluation of technically feasible alternatives to conventional harbor and channel modifications, with minimum disruption of the natural environment. SCOPE Subject studies would be comprehensive multi-agency studies encom- passing engineering, economic, social, and environmental aspects relative to marine transportation-port facility requirements. While focused on developing technically feasible solutions to problems associated with super-ships, hazardous cargoes, port congestion, etc., studies would also include evaluations of the interrelationship between water trans- portation and other modes serving specific ports and hinterland areas. Studies would include, but not be limited to, detailed investigations and analyses of trendiin commodity movements and fleet compositions; identification of implications, by regions, of projected traffic move- ments and vessel dimensions; analyses of port and ancillary facilities required to effectively accommodate such traffic, evaluation of alterna- tive transport and cargo-handling systems based on foreseeable techno- logical developments; and consideration of appropriate financial participation by Federal and non-Federal entities, including States, political subdivisions thereof and/or other local interests. These studies would be performed as a coordinated effort among the various Federal departments, states, municipalities, ports and maritime 2 associations, and other local, public and private interests expected to participate in advisory as well as information-providing capacities. Supporting work would be performed through the Sea Grant program of the National Science Foundation and by contract with private consultants, universities, or research organizations, with maximum use made of exist- ing information, to integrate studies currently underway or contemplated under other separate authorities, and to limit work to the amount and degree of refinement needed to satisfy study objectives. The intent is to draw on available expertise and organizations rather than to establish new or duplicate groups. ACTIVITIES For purposes of illustrating the extent of potential planning activity, a "Planning Matrix" showing principal study subjects and likely participants for each study activity is inclosed as Exhibit 1. Fifteen major study events have been identified but may logically be grouped into four principal study categories as follows: a. Data Base items include basic data and supporting studies per- taining to Economic Base, Commodity Flow, and Transportation Economics. b. Transportation System events include investigations and analyses of Inter-Modal Transportation; Harbors and Channels; Port Facilities; and Vessels. c. Limiting Factors include consideration of such significant but less tangible items as National Security, Policy, Financing, and Regulatory Aspects, and Health and Port Safety. 3 LEGEND: CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR HABOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDY Study Area Coordinator -----* Contributing ---------------x I PLANNING MATRIX Defense Commerce Transportation Interior HUD kgriculture Labor 0 t h e r Anwr IN vv Non-Federal Fqderal Study Areas 0 w -W % 4J .;;. W Cn (n P4 CO Ca H L) E-1 U U a P,H -W 14 Cn PC, (n @r4 C14M 4-41@3: @-l w 0 Cn M P4 rk@ Pq ;Q 0 0 r Economic Base x I I I X1 A *I xX1 x I I x I 1XI Ii Ix x I X x I x Commodity Flow 2; X1 I I I I ix x I I X_ xv x x x Transportation Economics x xi I X1 j x x x x x I Inter-Modal Transport x xi x I- I X_@ X, x x x x x Harbor & Channels 1XI x J I x x Port Facilities x x x x x I JX_ x x Ix x x x x Vessels x x * I I x x National Security _ x x x __2 .2L-- x x I Policy, Financing, & Regulatory Aspects x1x X1 x X1 x x x x x X. x x X. x X1 X _1x1 x XLI Ix I x x X1 Health & Port Safety x x x x X1 x Pollution x x x x I x X1 x Urban Develo2ment X_ x x1x1x *,X x x x x Marine Ecology, F&WL. x x x x x Aesthetics X1 X1 X.X x x Recreation x xi x x x (1) Study Area Coordinator to be determined prior to implementation of plan. EXHIBIT I @ x xx d. Environmental subjects will embrace evaluation of relation- ships between navigation and port facility requirements and.br'ban Developme nt; Pollution; Aesthetics; Recreation; Marine Ecology, and Fish and Wildlife. Each of the study categories identified above and listed in the lefthand column of Exhibit I are described in the Glossary, appended herewith. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES Based on an appraisal of statutory or program responsibilities of various Federal agencies, and non-Federal interests, likely participants or contributing agencies for each study category are indicated by the matrix in Exhibit I. One of these participating agencies would be designated the Study Coordinator for each activity. For example, the coordinator for Economic Base data and economic projections would likely be the Office of Business Economics, Department of Commerce, with participation by Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Mines, Economic Research Service, and others. A descrip- tion of agency functional responsibilities and activities in the field of water and related land resources planning and development is given in the appended Glossary. COORDINATION Conduct of in-depth harbor and port development studies will require drawing on highly specialized technical skills and knowledge, and the study must be conceived as a coordinated partnership among Federal agencies and non-Federal interests. 4 A conceptual organization chart has been prepared and inclosed as Exhibit II. This chart indicates the broad relationship between basic elements of the study organization and the task groups for specific subjects, drawn from Exhibit I. ORGANIZATION Since it is recognized that harbor and port development studies must be performed as a coordinated effort among the various Federal departments, states, municipalities, ports and maritime associations and other local, public and private,interests expected to participate, these studies would be accomplished in accordance with the principles of the Water Resources Planning Act (P.L. 89-80). The regional study groups, including representatives of the key agencies who would be assigned full time to study work, would develop detailed plans of surveys and accomplish or coordinate base studies on commodity movements, industrial projections, and shipping technology forecasts--necessary to delineation of shipping regions. Work associated with definition of study regions would require 12 to 15 months to accomplish. 5 HARBOR AND PORT DEVED)PMENT STUDY CONCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE AND ADVISORY AGENCIES FEDERAL NON-FEDERAL ADVISORY AGENCIES Dept. of Army Dept. of Health, Educa- Public and Private Interests Dep,-.. of Navy tion, and Welfare Industry Associations Dept. of Transportation Dept. of Commerce Maritime Associations Dept. of Interior Dept. of Housing and Port Association Dept. of Agriculture Urban Development Consultants AtomLc Energy Commiss@@on Dept. of Labor Federal Power Commiss.;on REGIONAL PORT STUDY GROUPS Study Activities for_Each Regional Study Economic Base Harbors and Channels Commodity Flow Port Facilities (Incl. Offshore) Vessels Inter-Modal Transport Transportation Costs and Rates Marine Ecology and Fish and Pollution Wildlife Urban Development Aesthetics Policy, Financing and Regulatory Aspects Recreation National Security Health and Port Safety EXHIBIT II SCHEDULE Comprehensive harbor and port development studies can be planned ,and coordinated by use of PERT (Performance Evaluation and Review Technique). The essential part of the PERT analysis is the determi- nation of the critical path, since this path represents the longest, in time, of all the various sequences of activities to be covered in'the study. Obviously, if time established for events on the critical path are not met, the overall study will not be completed on schedule even though other events or activities are finished on time or ahead of schedule. The critical path for major work activities of participating agencies in an overall regional port study is depicted on Exhibit III, as an example of such planning. The chart depicts broadly each job or activity essential to the study from start to finish, including work required to properly delineate and select regions for study, and identifies activities critical to maintaining study progress on schedule. The time interval for performing each activity is ex- pressed in months. Organizational elements expected to participate in a particular activity have been identified. Accompanying the chart is a tabulation showing the time duration of each study activity numerically coded in sequence and associated times at which each study activity must be started and completed. 6 HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPME NT STUDY CRITICAL PATH NETWORK a 0 1@>e cl . . . . . . 0 Ae <?> ... ...... ... .... Ho ED o Eyq, So 1. Elo E40 igq> rno -4 FH1 8<8> FA Eio 12 131 '11- ... ..... U LEGEND .. ......... C LJ<8> .. ...... Fj<@> E' 12 Page I of 4 CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDY CRITICAL PATH NETWORK MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF, MONTHS LEAD EARLIEST LATEST EARLIEST LATEST OF INTERVAL DESCRIPTION AGENCY DURATION START START FINISH FINISH SLACK 0 10 Begin delineation of regions for port study. Cc' 1 0 0 1 1 0 10 15 Develop policies and guidelines. cc 6 1 3 7 9 2 10 20 Define criteria and methodology of study. cc 2 1 7 3 9 6 10 30 Develop data on existing commodity flows and trends. DOC 6 1 1 7, 7 10 40 Review existing vessels, channels, port facil., etc. DOC. 6 1 3 7 9 2 30 50 Prepare commodity flow charts. DOC 2 7 7 9 9 0 50 60 Evaluate data. cc 2 9 9 11 11 0 60 70 Delineate existing port regions. cc 2 11 11 13 13 0 70 80 Public hearing. cc 1 13 13 14 14 0 80 90 Align port regions in priority and select initial region CC 1 14 14 15 15 0 90 100 Initiate regional port study. RSG 3 15 15 18 18 0 100 110 Economic base.study. DOC 6 18 21 24 27 3 100 120 Develop basic commodity studies. DOC 6 18 21 24 27 3 100 130 Develop basic data on vessels DOC 3 18 24 21 27 6 100 140 Develop basic data on channels. CE 3 18 24 21 27 6 100 150 Develop basic data on port facilities incl offshore. DOC 4 18 23 22 27 5 100 160 Develop basic data on inter-modal transport. DOT 4 18 23 22 27 5 100 170 Develop basic data on transportation costs & rates. RSG 6 18 21 24 27 3 100 180 Develop criteria & methodology for plan formulation. RSG 6 18 18 24 24 0 100 210 Develop basic data on pollution. DI 3 18 38 21 41 20 100 220 Develop basic data on urban development. HUD 3 18 38 21 41 20 100 230 Develop basic data on marine ecology & fish & WL. DI 3 18 38 21 41 20 100 240 Develop basic data on aesthetics, CE 3 18 38 21 41 20 100 250 Develop basic data on recreation. RSG 3 18 38 21 41 20 100 330 Hold public hearing. RSG 1 18 26 19 8 100 610 Develop basic data on policy, financing and regulatory RSG 12 18 45 30 57 27 aspects. EXHIBIT III Page 2 of 4 MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF LEAD EARLIEST LATEST EARLIEST LATEST INTERVAL DESCRIPTION AGENCY DURATION START START FINISH FINISH SLACK i 100 620 Develop basic data on port safety. DOT 6 18 51 24 57 33 100 630 Develop basic data on national security. CE 6 18 51 24 57 33 110 260 Summarize data and projections for region (ECON). DOC 6 24 29 30 35 5 120 270 Studies of projected commodities. DOC 6 24 29 30 35 5 130 280 Summarize data and projections (Vessels). DOC 2 21 33 2@ 35 12 140 290 Summarize data and projections (Channels). CE 1 21 34 22 35 13 150 300 Summarize data and projections (Port Facilities). -DOC 2 22 33 24 35 11 160 310 Summarize data and projections (Inter-Modal Transp). DOT 2 22 33 24 35 11 170 320 Summarize data and projections (Trans. Costs & Rates). RSC 6 24 29 30 35 5 180 190 Develop outline of study. RSG 2 24 24 2 26 0 190 330 Review And approve outline of study. RSG 1 26 26 27, 27 0 210 440 Additional data as req'd (Pollution). DI 1 21 50 22 51 29 220 450 Add'I data as req'd (Urban Development). HUD 1 21 44 2@ 45 23 230 460 Add'I data as req'd (Marine Ecol. & fish & WQ. DI 1 21 44 2@ 45 23 240 470 Add'1 data as req'd (Aesthetics). CE 1 21 50 2i 51 29 250 480 Add'1 data as req'd (Recreation). DI 1 21 50 22 51 29 260 370 Add'1 data as req'd (Economic base study). DOC 1 30 50 3i 51 20 270 380 Add'l data as req'd (Commodity studies). DOC 1 30 50 3 ; 51 20 280 390 Add'1 data as req'd (Vessels). DOC 1 23 53 2@ 54 30 290 400- Add'I data as req'd (Channels). CE 1 23 44 24 45 21 300 410 Add'1 data as req'd (Port facilities incl offshore). DOC 1 24 44 45 20 310 420 Add'l data as req'd (Inter-modal transport). DOT 1 24 50 25 51 26 320 430 Add'1 data as req'd (Transportation Costs & Rates). RSG 1 30 54 3 1 55 24 330 335 Begin anal. transp cost differentials & assoc. invest. RSG 8 27 27 35 35 0 340 350 Make preliminary selection of alt. solutions. RSG 3 41 41 44 44 0 350 360 Hold public hearing. RSG 1 44 44 4-1) 45 0 360 640 Evaluate intermodal transportation effects. DOT 6 45 57 5i 63 12 360 650 Evaluate alternate solutions to chnI. deepening. CE 6 '45 51 51 57 6 Page 3 of 4 MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF EARLIEST LATEST LEAD EARLIEST LATEST I INTERVAL DESCRIPTION AGENCY DURATION START START FINISH FINISH SLACK 360 660 Evaluate obstructions to,channel deepening. CE 6 45 51 51 57 6 360 670 Evaluate spoil@disposal.., CE 6 45 51 5i 57 6 680 Evaluate changed economi c factors. RSG 3 .45 60 48 63 15 360 690 Evaluate port terminal & industrial reloc (Induced). DOC 6 45 51 51 57 6 360 700 Evaluate ecolooical & environmental effects. DI 6 45 51 51 57 6 360 710 Evaluate urban development (Waterfront Renewal). HUD 3 45 54 4@ 57 9 360 720 Evaluate effects on labor market. DL 3 45 54 48 57 9 360 730 Evaluate engineering & cost studies. CE 6 45 51 51 57 6 360 740 Evaluate land use & planning. HUD 3 45 54 48 57 9 370 490 Detailed data study for selected alternatives (Econ) DOC 6 45 51 51 57 6 380 500 Det..data study for select. alt. (Commodity Studies). DOC 6 45 51 5i 57 6 390 510 Det. data study for select. alt (Vessels). DOC 3 45 54 48 57 9 400 520 Det. data study for select. alt. (Channels). CE 12 45 45 57 57 0 410 530 Det. data study for select. alt. (Port Facilities)- DOC 12 45 45 57 57 0 420 540 Det. data study for select. alt. (Intermodal Transp.). DOT 6 45 51 51 57 6 430 550 Det. data study for select. alt. (Transp. Costs & Rates). RSG 2 45 55 41 57 10 440 560 Det. data study for select. alt. (Pollution). DI 6 45 51 51 57 6 450 570 Det. data study for select. alt. (Urban Development). HUD 12 45 45 51 57 0 460 580 Det. data study for select. alt. (Mar. Ecol. & Fish & WL).DI 12 45 45 51 57 0 470 59G Det. data study for select. alt. (Aesthetics). CE 6 45 51 51 57 6 480 600 Det. data study for select. alt. (Recreation). DI 6 45 51 51, 57 6 490 780 Complete draft appendix (Economic Base Study). DOC 3 51 79 54 82 28 500 780 Complete draft appendix (Commodity Studies). DOC 3 51 79 54 82 28 510 780 Complete draft appendix (Vessels). DOC 3 48 79 51 82 31 520 780 Complete draft appendix (Channels). CE 3 57 79 60 82 22 .530 780 Complete draft appendix (Port Facilities). DOC 3 57 79 60 82 22 540 780 Complete draft appendix (Intermodal Transport). DOT 3 51 79 54 82 28 550 780 Complete draft appendix (Transportation Costs & Rates). RSG 3 47 79 50 82 32 560 780 Complete draft appendix (Pollution). DI 3 51 79 54,1 82 28 Page 4 of 4 MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF MONTH OF LEAD EARLIEST LATEST EARLIEST LATEST INTERVAL DESCRIPTION AGENCY DURATION START START FINISH FINISH SLACK 570 780 Complete draft appendix (Urban Development). HUD 3 57 79 60 82 22 580 780 Complete draft appendix (Marine Ecol. & Fish & WI). DI 3 57 79 610 82 22 590 780 Complete draft appendix (Aesthetics). CE 3 51 79 54 82 28 600 780 Complete draft appendix '(Recreation). DI 3 51 79 54 82 28 630 780 Complete draft appendix (Policy, Finan. & RegionAspects, Nat. Sec., Port Safety). RSG 3 30 79 33 82 49 640 750 Continue evaluation (Intermodal Transp. Effects). DOT 6 57 63 63 69 6 650 750 Continue evaluation (Alt. Sol. to Chnl Dpng). CE 12 57 57 619 69 0 660 750 Continue evaluation (Obstructions to Chnl Dpng). CE 12 57 57 6t9 69 0 670 750 Continue evaluation (Spoil Disposal). CE 12 57 57 69 69 0 680 750 Continue evaluation (Changes Economic Factors). RSG 6 57 63 6!3 69 6 690 750 Continue evaluation (Port Term. & Ind. Relocations). DOC 12 57 57 69 69 0 700 750 Continue evaluation (Ecological & Environ. Effects). DI 12 57 57 69 69 0 710 750 Continue evaluation (Urban Develop-Waterfront Renew). HUD 12 57 57 69 69 0 720 750 Continue evaluation (Effects on Labor Market). DL 12 57 57 69 69 0 730 750 Continue Engineering and Cost Studies. CE 12 57 57 69 69 0 740 750 Continue evaluation(Land Use Planning). HUD 12 57 57 6'9 69 0 750 760 Correlate advantages & disadvantages and develop plan. RSG 6 69 69 75 75 0 760 770 Hold public hearing. RSG 1 75 75 716 76 0 770 780 Formulate final alt. plans for region and draft report. RSG 6 76 76 82 82 0 780 790 Review draft report. RSG 2 82 82 84' 84 0 790 800 Revise report and appendices. ALL 3 84 84 817 87 0 335 340 Complete anal. of transp. costs & assoc. invest. RSG 6 35 35 411 41 0 100 225 Develop criteria and methodology for eval. sel. alter. I Solut. RSG 18 18 24 316 42 6 225 235 Develop evaluation plan. RSG 1 36 42 37 43 6 235 245 Review and approve evaluation plan. RSG 1 37 43 318 44 6 The determination of the study schedule encompasses an organized sequential development of study requirements as generally envisioned at this time. It not only shows the duration of specific tasks, but portrays the points at which each activity must be completed before the next activity can begin. Activities completed prior to established target dates will have slack time. This procedure permits flexibility in scheduling work and provides for optimum utilization of available man- power and funds during the course of the overall study. COSTS Because of their magnitude and complexity, costs for the comprehen- sive studies cannot be determined with any degree of precision at this time. Ultimate study costs, comprehensiveness, and schedule would obviously be affected by budgeting and manpower limitations as well as certain technical constraints. It is also recognized that study costs would be a direct function of such variables as (a) the extent and nature of commodity flow patterns for individual regions, and number and type of ports therein; (b) scope and degree of in-depth investiga- tions required to meet specified study objectives; (c) availability of suitable data through existing Federal or non-Federal entities from previous, ongoing, or contemplated studies and programs funded under other specific authorities or for other purposes; and (d) indeterminate need for contractual services of consultants, research institutions, or other private organizations having recognized expertise in certain fields allied to ocean shipping, navigation and port facilities, intermodal transportation, or technical proficiency in systems analysis. In the 7 latter connection, certain research activities or studies which have a direct bearing on development, conservation, or economic utilization of marine resources may qualify for funding support by We National Science Foundation's Sea Grant Program. Based on a cursory review of costs actually experienced or currently estimated for several completed and on-going comprehensive river-basin studies involving interagency participation, and examination of pre7 authorization study costs for a number of individual port surveys con- ducted by the Corps of Engineers, the cost for a prototype regional port study can be tentatively estimated at $4 million. Considering the vari- ability of factors previously enumerated it is reasonable to expect that costs for one regional study could range from a minimum of $2.5 million up to $6.0 million. Assuming six years would be required to study and prepare plans for a system of regional port developments the following funding schedule for a single region is considered illustrative: Year FY Funds First $ 500,000 Second 700,000 Third 1,000,000 Fourth 1,000,doo Fifth 500,000 Sixth 300,000 Totql $4,000,000 As an illustration of how study funds of about $4,000,000 for a single region might be distributed, Exhibit IV has been developed based on a computerized procedure to allocate funds to study activities assigned to each agency. As shown in Exhibit I, "Planning Matrix," study areas are 8 FUNDING ALLOCATION MATRIX CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR:HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDY Page I of 2 Pages M - Millions of Dollars K - Thousands of Dollars PLANNING MATRIX D E F E N S E $1.2 m C 0 M M E R C E $1.1 M $898 K I N T E R 1 0 R $340 K T R A N S P 0 R T A T 1 0 Army Navy Study Areas r@ 00 w 1.0 C*4 Ln C-4 r@ --4 04 04 %D 1,4 w Ln 0 Cq U -4 E__1 Lr) 01% U 01) w C) M CV) 01.0 Lr) -4 4 0 1-4 1-4 C-4 P4 -4 M 0 C14 PQ Cq P 04 Cq -4 -4 rn! ce) (ON 0 CY) Cn W 00 00 It El P4 00 00 -4 -4 rn -4 1-4 Ln 0 -4 'A ce) -Cf)- <0- V').- 0')- z V)_ <r, PQ V)_ 0 <n- PQ <rj- PCI r4 v->- PCI V)- U V)- rZ1 V@ PL4 V)- Pr4 <r)- Pq <r- 0 <f)- 0 Economic Base 40 10 20 140 20 20 60 $430 K Commodity Flow 36 36 36 212 36 36 36 36 $572 K I I I I Transportation 65 16 32 60 65 65 65 65 130 Economics $563 K Inter-Modal Transport $285 K 35 10 10 10 45 35 35 35 7@ 0 Harbors &:'Channels $568 K 370 95 95 8 Port Facilities- 130 55 20 55 20 150 10 20 40 $575 K Vessels $142 K 20 35 1 50 25 J- National Security 25 8 8 25 8 8 4 25 10 10 4 6 $141 K I I I I - I Policy, Fin., & Reg. '11 3 3 7 3 12 3 12 12 2 2 2 15 11 2 Aspects $149 K Health & Port Safety $143 K 6 22 45 Pollution $72 K 14 3 J 14 23 Urban Development. $72 K 10 5 10 Marine Ecology, F&WL $178 K @4 25 9 105 Aesthetics $75 K 19 14 18 Recreation 12 12 20 $72 K EXHIBIT IV CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR HARBOR AND PORT DEVELOPMENT STUDY Page 2 of 2 Pages PLANNING MATRIX $168 K H U D $92 K A G R1 I C U L T U R E L A B 0 R $166K 0 T H E R $ 165 K Federal NQ! -.1-Federal S,*-udy Areas 41 00 4J > 0 0 Cn Cn 0% P4 W LA 0 M 110 -4 -A 00 Cf) rT4 M 44 M CQ N P4 -4 '@D W r-4 4 ul @3: Ln F-1 00 W -4 P4 Ln @4 44 _C@ 0 <*- 0 <r@ W PQ <0_ PQ <& P0 C@ Pq 0).- rX4 <rj- V) z W P4 Economic Base 60 60 Commodity Flow 36 36 36 Transportatio n Economics Inter-Modal Transport Harbors & Channels Port Facilities 19 56 Vessels 12 National Security Policy, Pinancing, & 2 12 12 12 12 7 ,.Regulatory Aspects 2 Health & Port Safety 23 17 30 Pollution 9 9 Urban Development 8 3 3 3 20 5 5.. Marine Ecology, F&WL 50 Aesthetics 8 8 Recreation 8 Sea Grant Program EXHIBIT IV No special funding required. listed as economic base, commodity flow, transportation economics, etc., totaling 15 in number. Across the top of the matrix are the various departments and agencies within the departments who would be considered as participating in the development of the regional port study. This is a preliminary approximation based on considered judgements made in advance of more detailed task descriptions or their pricing out by responsible agencies. As noted above, the overall cost of this study program would be dependent on a number of variable and presently indeterminate factors. Assuming that at least five comprehonsive regional studies would be undertaken, the total cost for completing such studies may range from $12 to $15 million, depending on their depth. A sum.of this magnitude, while large, is relatively small when compared with the enormous public and private investments likely to be committed for future harbor and port development projects and with the tremendous national monetary and social benefits to be realized. APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF EVENTS AND AGENCY FUNCTIONS A. EVENTS 1. Economic Base - Analysis and projections of population, employ- ment, natural resources, industrial and agricultural production and consumption. 2. Commodity Flow - Analysis of principal oceanborne commerce-with future projections. Data will include origin and destination of commodity, port of entry/exit, and mode of transportation utilized within continental United States. Includes how far from port areas traffic originates or terminates, volume by railroads, by trucks, barges and pipelines, concentration of traffic origins and desti- nations, predominant export-import commodities, and ports through which most commodities are shipped. 3. Transportation Economics - Study of land and ocean operating costs and freight rates to establish cost and rate differentials for routings. 4. Inter-modal Transport - Analysis of present water, rail, highway and air transportation facilities serving portal areas. Projections of future developments in each mode and possibilities for consolidation in port and hinterland areas. 5. Harbors and Channels - Inventory of present navigable ports, water- ways, cost data for enlarging (depth and width) present channel s or provisions of new ones. A-1 6. Port Facilities - Analysis of present waterfront cargo handling and passenger facilities - projections for future needs, including type, size and configuration, including offshore loading/unloading alternatives. 7. Vessels - Analysis and projections of vessel dimensions, cargo handling configurations, propulsion modes and maneuvering capabilities. 8. National Security - Assurance of the fulfillment of national de- fense requirements in port areas including the security of the whole land and water environment. 9. Policy, Financing, and Regulatory Aspects - Inventory and analysis of Federal, State, and municipal programs and activities bearing on navigation, terminal location and/or relocation,, cargo handling, trans- portation facilities, spoil areas, and related matters. Analysis of various financing procedures, both public and private, for planning, construction, and maintenance of harbor and port facilities, and recommendations for financing procedures which will best assist transition to the port systems envisioned in the regional studies. 10. Health and Port SafeLy - Analysis of present navigational and environmental hazards in port areas. Projections for future based on anticipated hazardous cargoes, waterway alterations, and potential effects of nuclear vessel propulsion, including contemporary methods for handling quarantine activities, provision for effective detection and destruction of disease vectors. 11. Pollution - Control pollution to enhance the quality and value of water resources and to assure the fulfillment of a national policy for the prevention, control and abatement of water pollution. A-2 12. Urban Development - Coordination of existing urban development and port development planning. Projections for future needs to assure inter-program compatibility. 13. Marine EcologyFish and Wildlife - Effects of planned harbor alterations on marine life, aquifers and land drainage patterns. Protection and enhancement of both land and water fauna for sport and commercial use, wildlife conservation and related esthetic bene- fits. 14. Aesthetics - Enhancement of the natural and scenic beauty of port and harbor areas. 15. Recreation - Maximization, preservation, protection, restoration and development of port and harbor areas for re-creational purposes. B. DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCY FUNCTIONS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CE - Army Corps of Engineers - Under Civil Works program is authorized to investigate, plan, and provide water and related land resources developments and has primary Federal responsibility for planning, construction, operation and maintenance of harbors and channels in the interest of navigation. MTMTS - MilitaryTraffic Management and Terminal Service Responsibility for military traffic management, land transportation and common-user ocean terminal service in the Department of Defense. AMC - Army Materiel Command - Provides Army materiel, its distribution and transportation. A-3 MSTS - Military Sea Transportation Service - Provides ocean trans- portation for personnel and cargo of the Department of Defense. NMC - Navy Materiel Command - Provides materiel support for the Navy and Marine Corps. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE MARAD - Maritime Administration - Administers program for develop- ment, promotion and operation of the U. S. merchant marine. Has responsibility for promotion and development of ports and.related transportation facilities including the investigation of territorial region and zones tributary to ports taking into consideration the economies of transportation by rail, water, highway, and pipeline, advising communities regarding type and appropriate location and ad- vantages of port improvements for the most economic transfer of cargo between carriers, all in connection with the land and water flow of inland and ocean commerce. BOC - Bureau of the Census - Collects, processes, and provides basic statiftical data pertaining to population, agriculture, manu- factures, mineral industries, business transportation, and U. S. foreign trade. Conducts surveys and provides data processing and advisory services to others. OBE - Office of Business Economics - Prepares current and historical data and provides economic measures of the national economy, present and future. Conducts analyses of U. S. balance of international payments, and of factors affecting regional economic development, and performs economic research. A-4 EDA Economic Development Administration - Responsible for long- range economic development and programming for areas and regions of persistent unemployment through the creation of new employment oppor- tunities by developing new and expanding facilities and resources in such areas and regions. BDSA - Bureau of Defense Services Administration - Provides active assistance to business and industry in areas involving the industry and commerce of the United States. Collects, analyzes, and disseminates data on industrial requirements, technological developments, economic trends, and potential impact on business and the economy of contemplated or effected Government actions. ESSA - Environmental Science Services Administration (Coast and Geodetic Survey and Weather Bureau) - Conducts comprehensive programs with respect to meteorology, climatology, hydrology, surveying, carto- graphy and oceanography. Processes and issues data on river stages, coastal tides and currents. BIC - Bureau of International Commerce- Promotes the foreign trade of the United States for the primary purpose of increasing U. S. exports. Provides information on marketing, investment, and economic conditions in foreign countries to determine export potentials and is the primary source for analyses of trade statistics of other nations. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OST - Office of Secretary of Transportation - Responsible for analysis of transportation systems, transportation economics, and econometric modeling. On-going projects include forecasts o -f ship A-5 technology, analysis of intercity intra-urban interface, research of intercity transport effectiveness, and methodology to forecast demand for transportation of transoceanic cargo. Provides leadership in the formulation and execution of our balanced national and international tran sportation objectives, policies and programs; stimulates and pro- motes research and development in all modes and types of transportation, with special emphasis on transportation safety. Coordinates various transportation programs of Federal Government and encourages maximum private development of transportation services. Determines need for and role of marine transportation in relation to other forms of trans- portation. CG - U.S. Coast Guard - Provides search and rescue services, a merchant marine safety program, aids to navigation, port security, en- forcement of Federal laws on high seas and U. S. waters. Provides safety and law enforcement facilities for benefit of and service to maritime commerce and recreational boating. FHWA - Federal Highway Administration - Responsible for matters relating to the highway mode of transportation and coordination of highway transportation with other modes. Investigates programs which affect highways and road facilities and insures adequate replacement for highway transportation facilities rendered inadequate by relocations or construction of water resources projects, waterfront renewal, and port terminal relocation. Evaluates economic cost for highway ad- justments caused by waterfront renewal programs. A-6 FRA - Federal Railroad Administration Provides unified national policy for rail transportation to fulfill present and future re- quirements. FAA - Federal Aviation Administration Regulates, promotes and controls the operation, development and use of aircraft in the interest of safety and efficiency. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR FWLS - Fish and Wildlife Service - Maintains the fishery and wild- life resources, commercial and sport, of the United States and determines probable effects of water resource projects on fish and wildlife. Recommends measures for preventing or reducing damages to these resources. Investigates effects of pollution on fish and wild- life. FWPCA - Federal Water Pollution Control Administration - Administers national program to enhance the quality and value of the Nation's water resources and assures the fulfillment of a national policy for prevention, control and abatement of water pollution. Concerned with propagation of fish and aquatic life and wildlife, recreation, agri- culture, industry, and other uses. BOM - Bureau of Mines - Projects anticipated requirements of energy and mineral resources for national economic growth and development, including economic and statistical studies of domestic and foreign production, distribution and consumption. BOR - Bureau of Outdoor Recreation - Coordinates federal planning and activities relating to outdoor recreation resources, cooperating with states, political subdivisions and private interests. A-7 OIA - Oil Imports Administration - Controls and regulates the im- ports of petroleum and its products in the United States. GS - Geological Survey - Collects and interprets, and disseminates data on mineral and water resources and the physical features of the country. Responsible for furnishing physical data needed for planning, design and operation of water resources ddvelopment.projects. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELMENT FHA - Federal Housing Authority - Administers loan and mortgage insurance program for various housing programs and land development consistent with, a comprehensive plan for an area. RAA - Renewal Assistance Administration - Responsibility for slum clearance and urban renewal programs including grants for neighborhood renewal, community renewal, open-space land, urban parks and central city parks, and urban beautification. HAA - Housing Assistance Administration - Responsibility for low rent public housing programs. LFDA - Land and Facilities Development Administration Responsi- bility for metropolitan incentive grants, sewer and facility grants and advance acquisition of open-space land for housing. OPSC - Office of Planning Standards and Coordination - Responsi- bility for urban planning assistance program and comprehensive planning affecting the programs of other Federal agencies. .0S - Office of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development - Overall responsibility for all activities embraced by the Department. A-8 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ERS - Economic Research Service - Responsibility for research and statistical analysis in field of agricultural economics and marketing, both foreign and domestic. CCC - Commodity Credit Corporation - Procurement and exp ortation of agricultural commodities. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BES - Bureau of Employment Security - Responsibility for public employment system service, Federal unemployment compensation programs. and special programs designed to relieve the effect of unemployment. BLS - Bureau of Labor Statistics - Responsibility for fact finding in the field of labor economics and manpower, costs and standards of 14.ving. BWP - Bureau of Works Progr - Responsibility for "Operation Mainstream," program for employment in community betterment and beautification. BLSTD - Bureau of Labor Standards - Service responsibility to state labor officials in improving working conditions. Promotes industrial safety and health, develops standards in the field of labor legislation. OTHER AGENCIES (FEDERAL AND NON-FEDERAL) HEW - Department of Health, Education and Welfare - Conducts re- search in the medical and related sciences including health services and dissemination of medical knowledge. Prevents the introduction of communicable diseases into the United States, and promotes the appli- cation of new knowledge for the prevention and control of disease. A-9 AEC - Atomic Energy Commission - Provides national policy for development, use and control of atomic energy. Administers programs and encourages private participation in such programs. Responsible for directing or participating in programs related to vessel pro- pulsion, port safety as-well as legal and institutional constraints. NSF - National Science Foundation - Responsible for programs to strengthen basic research and education in the sciences including programs aimed at strengthening research, education, and training in oceanography and exploitation of marine environment. FPC - Federal Power Commission - Administers study plans for por- posed Federal and non-Federal dams to be constructed and makes recom- mendations concerning the installation of facilities for the development of hydroelectric power. Assists in coordinating the development and utilization of water and related land resources. Makes studies on the potentialities for power development, the market for the potential power, and the value of the power. SI - Smithsonian Institution - (Office of Oceanograph and Limnology Responsible for service operations for marine biologists and geologists associated with the Smithsonian Institution. Arranges for projects under PL 480 - Excess Currency Act, and various cooperative research pro- grams. Participates in aspects of the national oceanographic program. Coordinates research in many estuaries of the United States and other parts of the world. States Individual state government agencies. A-10 Municipal - County, city or township agencies Private Non-governmental associations and commercial inter ests. A-11 DATE DUE GAYLORD No. 2333 PRINTED IN @.S.A. 3 6668 14107 2738