Town of Minnesott Beach land use plan, 1987

[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

TOW N OF

COASTAL ZONE

INFORMATION CENTER

m@. 6..

i4D LAND USE PLAN
268
cl m56
B76
MINNESOTT
BEACH

1987 1987
c)

oj,@,

Town. of Minnesott Beach
Land Use Plan,
198@/ COASTAL ZONE
INFORMATION CENTER

Developed and Adopted by the Planning Board and
Town Council of the Town of Minnesott Beach

.0 Locally Adopted on May 12, 1987

CRC Certified on June 5, 1987
=:F

Otis Peele John Anthes
Mayor Planning Board Chairman

prepared by:
Dick Brockett, Senior Planner
Rich Hall, Intern
Wanda Roberson, Typist
East Carolina University Regional Development Institute
Willis Building
Greenville, N.C.

The preparation of this report was financed in part through a grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal
Managment Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended,
which is administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE NO.

PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

EXECUTIVE SUnv1ARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii

SECTION ONE: COMMUNITY PROFILE AND DESCRIPTION . . . . . . 1

A. POPULATION AND SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2. Permanent Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

3. Seasonal Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

B. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2. Soils and Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3. Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

4. Mineral Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

C. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2. Convercial Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 9

3. Residential Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

4. Tburism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

5. Local Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

6. Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

7. Existing Land Use Cznpatibility . . . . . . . . . . 11

8. Changes in Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

9. Unplanned Develogrient Potential . . . . . . . . . . 13

10. Areas of Enviromental Concern . . . . . . . . . . 14

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

PAGE NO.

D. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRA=S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

E. MAN-MADE HAZARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

F. ESTIMATED CITIZEN DEMAND/SATISFACTION . . . . . . . . .. 21

SECTION TWO: PLANNING PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

A. PLAN FORMULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

2. Local Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

3. Issue Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

4. Intergovernmental Cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . 28

5. Current plans, Management Tools, and Policies . . . 30

B. EXISTING POLICIES REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

SECTION THREE: POLICY FORMULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

A. NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICIES . . . . . . . . . 37

1. Areas of Environmental Concern . . . . . . . . . . 37

2. Development in Areas with Land Constraints (Hazards
or Fragile Characteristics) . . . . . . . . . . 42

3. Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post-Disaster Recovery and
Evacuation Plan Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

B. RESOURCE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . 49

1. Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

2. Convercial Forestry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

3. Mining Resource Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

4. Conrercial and Recreational Fisheries . . . . . . . 49

5. off-Road Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

6. Residential and Comnercial Land Development . . . . 49

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

PAGE NO.

C. ECONOMIC AND COMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . 50

1. Desired Land Develogrent/Redevelopment . . . . . . 50

2. Lccal CmuLitment to Service Provisions . . . . . . 51

3. Beach and Waterfront Access . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

4. Floating Marina/Development Homes . . . . . . . . . 55

5. Cam-Litment to State and Federal Programs . . . . . 55

D. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

E. STOR4 HAZARD MITIGATION, POST DISASTER RECOVERY, AND
EVACUATION PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

1. Discussion . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

2. Storm HAzard Mitigation Policies . . . . . . . . . 58

3. Hurricane Evacuation Plan . . . . . . . ... . . . . 59

CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

SECTION FOUR: 1AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . 64

A. OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

B. DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

C. CATEGORIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

1. Developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

2. Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

3. Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

4. Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

5. conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

D. POLICIES RELATED TO LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM . . . . 69

1. Ccmmmity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

2. Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

PAGE NO.

3. Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

4. Developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

5. Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

SECTION FIVE: POLICY SYNOPSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

A. OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

B. LISTING AND ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

APPENDIX

LISTING OF MAPS/GRAPHICS

PAGE NO.

MAP/GRAPHIC 1 - LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

MAP/GRAPHIC 2 - POPULATION PR0=ION . . . . . . . . . . 5

MAP/GRAPHIC 3 - EXISTING LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

MAP/GRAPHIC 4 - AREAS OF ENVIPaZENTAL CONCERN . . . . . . 39

MAP/GRAPHIC 5 - HAZARDS/CONSTRAINTS . . . . . . . . . . . 44

MAP/GRAPHIC 6 - FLOOD HAZARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

MAP/GRAPHIC 7 - LAND CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . 71

MAP/GRAPHIC 7a - EXISTING ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

LISTING OF EXHIBITS

PAGE NO.

EXHIBIT 1 - Population Projection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

E)MBIT 2 - Population Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

EXHIBIT 3 - Water Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

EXHIBIT 4 - Residential Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

EXHIBIT 5 - soil Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

EXHIBIT 6 - Crosstabulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

EXHIBIT 7 - Planning Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

EXHIBIT 8 - 1980 Local Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

PPEFACE

The following document was developed pursuant to the format suggested

by the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission. The data, background

information, and referenced documents were developed based upon the

guidelines spelled out in Subchapter 7B of the North Carolina Administra-

tive Code. Other information used in the developTrent of the plan was

generated during the planning process itself through personal interviews,

the community survey instrument, and the previous land use plan.

The final determinations of this plan were subject to close scrutiny

by the planners, local planning board, local officials, and interested

citizens. It represents the most logical and realistic approach to the

local issues, problems, and opportunities of the Town of Minnesott Beach.

It is felt the document provides a firm foundation for the pursuit

of environmental integrity and the realization of the best developed

community possible.

Vii

EXECUTIVE SLMVMRY

The Town of Minnesott Beach is continuing to maintain its character

as an attractive, retirement-oriented community on the banks of the Neuse

River. Though a relatively young municipality, the town has taken quick

steps to equip itself with land management tools that will ensure a certain

quality of development blended with environmental integrity.

During the past five years, the town has experienced moderate growth

with residential development--multi-family and single-family dwelling--

constituting the majority of the growth. The construction and expansion

of the local marina has been the only significant cam-ercial development

over this period of time.

Minnesott Beach is unique in that the town has fewer, severe physical

constraints than the surrounding areas of Pan-Llico County. An appealing

location, higher elevation, and comparatively good soils all contribute

to this enviable situation. Though these attributes are welcomed, they

also necessitate that proper controls be in place to acccmTK)date the

inevitable, continued development of properties.

The town continues to be faced with a small population base, a

small tax base, and a remote location. Each of these contribute to a

limited amount of urban services being offered by the municipality.

Beyond a centralized water system, garbage and trash collection, and road

maintenance, the town does not provide urban services. The town will

continue to work toward amenable solutions to correct these deficiencies

through cooperation with the County and nearby communities/service

districts. The town has sought within this plan to identify certain steps

viii

toward potential solutions which will gradually service local needs and

yet not be fiscally unfeasible for its limited resources.

on the other hand, the town will not relinguish its conmitnent to

develop as a single-family residential ccnuunity despite the obvious tax

revenue advantages that could be attained through other types of develop-

mnt. The emphasis on quality, envirornentally-sensitive development

will continue to be sought through the developmnt and inplermntation of

available codes and ordinances.

The pace of developTent during the next five years is expected to be

consistent with the past five years. Although some acceleration may take

place as inland shoreline areas become increasingly attractive to the

expanding number of retirement age citizens. Because of past and present

planning efforts, the small municipality of Minnesott Beach has the "basics"

to plan and protect its inTrediate future. Furtherrmre, the town has

demonstrated a willing attitude to take new actions during the planning

period to ensure its role as a responsible local government.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The 1986 Land Use Plan Update of the Town of Minnesott Beach was

a cooperative effort that enabled a workable, useful planning document

to be developed. The author would like to acknowledge the assistance

of the following citizens for their input, interest, and devotion of

tine in this plan's preparation.

Ottis Peele, Mayor, Town of Minnesott Beach
John Anthes, Chairman, Minnesott Beach Planning Board
Allen Shepard, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Zeb J&nes, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Thomas Kinney, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Herbert Willis, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Connie Kinney, Tbwn Clerk, Tbwn of Minnesott Beach

SECTION ONE

COMMTY AND PROFILE DESCRIPTION

SECTION ONE: COMM(MITY PROFILE AND DESCRIPTION

A. POPULATION AND SETTING

1. General Description

Minnesott Beach is located in Pamlico County at the

southern-most point (see next page). The community is located along

the Neuse River as it flows toward the Pamlico Sound. The incorporation

of the town is relatively recent (1973) but has been the location for

seasonal hones, sunmer visitors, and recreational enjoyment for several

decades. The town consists of approximately 980 acres of land.

Today, the ccumunity is becoming the home of more permanent

residents and is the site of many speculative lots for second homes or

permanent residences. The development taking place has been primarily

limited to residential development or its associated recreational develop-

ment (i.e. Marina, Golf Course). Limited conmercial development has

occur-red.

Highway access to the town is by N.C. Highway 306 only. A

state-maintained ferry provides access from southern Craven County and

Carteret County areas.

The town is atypical topographically for the coastal plain

of North Carolina. Due to.its location along a high sandy bank which

is correctly identified as the Suffolk scarp the town does exhibit some

topographical relief, especially along the creek tributaries feeding into

the Neuse River.

The town is bordered by a large YMCA camp (Carp Seagull)

to the east, the town of Arapahoe to the north, and the Neuse River on

the south. The western border is unincorporated Pamlico County.

PAMLICO COUNTY

x lc-t

I-A

Location Nl. N*I

Map

2. Permanent Population

The amount of permanent population residing in Minnesott

Beach has only been recorded once in the official federal census. Being

incorporated in 1973, previous counts included the entire enumeration

district (ED540U). The 1980 Census counted 171 persons as permanent

residents of Minnesott Beach. This figure contradicts the estimated

320 persons cited in the 1980 land use plan which was based upon the

following:
TABLE Al

139 occupied Units X 2.3 Average Household Size 320 persons

Based upon the available survey information, the average

household size (permanent and seasonal) is 2.5 persons. It is generally

felt the permanent household size in Minnesott Beach is not that high and

the number of permanent residences is not as high as the previous consultants

had estimated. The citizen survey indicates permanent household size to

be close to 2.11.

Present housing surveys indicate a total of 106 permanent

housing units located within the town limits. Using the per household

figure calculated from the survey figures, a total of 224 permanent

residents are now estimated in the municipality. Using the previous factor

of 2.3 persons per household (1980 Land Use Plan), the figure is 244

persons. As one can see, such differences represent sizeable changes in

the population estimates from the 1980 Plan.

TABLE B

106 Permanent Housing Units X 2.11 1986 Survey = 224 persons
figure

106 Permanent Housing Units X 2.3 1980 Household = 244 persons
factor
11980 Minnesott Beach Land Use Plan, Coastal Consultants Ltd.

Both estimates are higher than the North Carolina Office

of State Budget and Managenent's 1984 estimate of 195 persons. Even

based upon those figures, Mixmesott Beach has had the highest growth

rate of the County's mmicipalities (14.0%) (See Exhibit 1).

EXHIBIT 1: POPULATION PF<O=ION

1970 Census 1980 Census 1984 Estimate % Change

PAMLICO COUNTY 9,467 10,398 10,859 4.4
Alliance 577 616 647 5.0
Arapahoe 212 467 476 1.'9
Bayboro 665 759 771 1.6
Hollyville ... 100 102 2.0
Mesic 369 .390 400 2.6
Minnesott Beach 41 171 195 14.0
oriental 445 536 606 13.1
Stonewall 335 360 359 -0.3
Vanden-ere 379 335 333 -0.6

Source: N.C. Department of Administration.

Minnesott Beach has little in the way of historical census

data to base their projected population growth. Two projections (see

Map/Graphic 2 on page 5) are provided, one (Projection Line B) using the

two most recent census figures and one (Projection Line A) using the State

of North Carolina Office of Management and Budget's 1984 estimate. The latter

estimate is based upon four methods: constant proportion, partitioned change,

vital rates, and auto and truck registration. This percentage gain corres-

ponds directly with the increase in water customer tap-ons during the past

five years (See Exhibit 3).

The accuracy of Projection A is assumed to be more dependable

due to the abnormal influences placed upon Projection B. These influences,

such as the incorporation, installation of water service, and the opening

of the major subdivision that comprises a majority of the town, represent

skewing effects. Based upon present information and the unknown influence

MAP/GRAPBIC 2

+101@j

(OV
A '257
it's

low

Ito

YEAK 11761 MISS 1 q9tv 1991;

I- 14TO CKO-SUi-
lqba e--Wrj@SJ6
q &4 e-rt4wLI6

of the popularity of water-related developa-ent, increased retiree

impact, and uncertain economic factors, an estimate between Projection

A and Projection B may be the most accurate for future planning purposes.

one fact that may be incorporated into this projection is that nearly

one-third (32.2%) of the seasonal residents and/or property owners in

the citizen survey responses plan to permanently move to Minnesott Beach

within the next 5 years. This represents 20 new households (18.9% household

increase).

The ccniposition of the permanent population is 52.6% Female

and 47.4% Male with nearly 95% of the residents being white. The nedian

age figure (40.7 years) reflects the retirement age of the cam=ity. This

conpares with 29.6 years and 32.3 for North Carolina and Pamlico County,

respectively. Nearly 12% of the permanent population is 65 years or above.

No detailed age breakdown for municipalities under 2,500 persons is

available.

EXHIBIT 2

POPUIATION BREAKDOWN

Total Persons Male % Male Female % Female
171 9_2 47.4 89 52.6

AGE GROUP

Under 5 years of age 18 years+ 65 years+ Median
11/6.4% 133/77.8% 19/11.7% 40.7 years

EXHIBIT 3

WATER CONNECTIONS

Year Full-time % Change- Seasonal % Change Total % Change

1981 88 N/A 32 N/A 120 N/A

1986 106 +20.5 34* +6.3 140 +16.6

*Does not include seasonal trailers, mobile home spaces.

Source: Town of Minnesott Beach.

3. Seasonal pMlation

Wenty-four percent (24%) of the town's population

consider themselves seasonal residents based upon water custcmer

registration (See Exhibit 3). The survey results show approximately

14% of the household responses considered themselves seasonal residents

of Minnesott Beach. Such residents are primarily single family hcme-

ova,iers that retain second homes in Minnesott Beach.

The current, available housing stock equals 182 units.

Using the overall per household figure of 2.5 generated by the citizen

survey, this represents a potential seasonal population of 455 persons.

Due to the lack of data for motel space, cottages, trailers, etc., this

estimate should be considered a minimum figure. This projected seasonal

increase places the potential population of Minnesott Beach at

least 103% higher than the permanent population.

B. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION

1. General Description

The town of Minnesott Beach is mostly typical of the small

towns located in Pamlico County and along the coast of North Carolina.

The topography is relatively flat despite the presence of the afore-

mentioned scarp (ridge) that exists. The soils have a sandy texture with

some clay content. The landscape is comprised mostly of pines; with some

oaks, maples, gums, dogwoods, and wax myrtles scattered throughout the

area.

2. Soils and Slope

The most predominant soil type within the corporate limits

of Minnesott Beach is Alpin. Other major soil types which exist include

Baymeade and Conetoe. Each of the soil types have some degree of physical

limitation on development and the proper functioning of septic tank

systems. Kenansville is the most adequate, but an=ts to less than

5% of the town's soil type materials. other suitable soils include

Conetoe and Baymeade. Overall, Minnesott Beach's soil types are

generally better than the remainder of Pamlico County.

As stated, the topography is relatively flat with slope

elevations ranging from I to 5 percent. Steep enbankments are encountered

along some portions of the shorelines of the Neuse River and Alligator

Gut.

3. Vegetation

The town of Minnesott Beach has generally been carved from

stands of pine trees that have stood on the gently-rolling sandy banks.

With scm hardwoods scattered throughout the area, the vegetative cover

has provided a nice conplement to the attractiveness of the Neuse River.

Sme aquatic plants exist along the estuarine shoreline

including cordgrass and spartina. A portion of this vegetation has been

artificially introduced by property owners to diminish the erosive effects

of wave action.

4. Mineral Resources

A major mineral resource that exists within the sedimentary

rock of Pamlico County and thus Minnesott Beach is phosphate. The likely

occurrence of such deposits is dictated by the level of sand content. In

the subsurfaces below Minnesott Beach a moderate concentration (50% to 75%

sand) occurs.

No othe r mineral resources are known to exist.

C. CC MMUNITY DESCRTPTION

1. General Description

-The character of Minnesott Beach has basically remained the

same with residential development continuing to be the primary land use

(See Map/Graphic 3). Some change in the types of residential development

has taken place over the past five years as condcminiums/townhouses

have been built. These units are intended for full-time or seasonal

use by the owners. Otherwise, the additional units in the town have

been conventional single-family residences. The marina facility, cited

in the 1980 land use plan, has also been completed with some expansion.
The paragraplis below, along with Sections 5, 6, and 7, provide

additional details about present land use patterns.

2. Cbmmercial land Use

Commercial development has not changed significantly in

the town. Development associated with marina improvements has constituted

the most significant change in the landscape of the tzwn. Commercial

development and activity in vicinity of the Highway 306 junction has

virtually remained the same since the previous land'use plan was written.

3. Residential Land Use (Housing)

The following breakdown depicts the residential character

of Minnesott Beach.

EXHIBIT 4

Single Family Units Multi-Family Mobile Homes Vacant
110 19 46 N/A

Source: Rich Hall, Planning Intern, East Carolina University Regional
Development Institute.

4. Tourism

No significant increase in tourist-related development of

services has been noted in Minnesott Beach over the planning period.

The local marina complex and golf course cater to the second-

hcme and retired residents of the town. Supplemental tourist amenities

such as hotel/motel space and restaurants are limited in the immediate area.

Most tourists using the existing ferry service do not spend time in

Minnesott Beach.

No strong local desire to attract these tourists was

expressed during the planning process.

5. Local Ehploywnt

a. Agricultural

No agricultural activities take place within the town

limits of Mirmesott Beach and no prime agricultural lands exist within

the town limits.

b. Cbmercial Forestry

No cam-ercial forestry operations exist within the town

limits of Minnesott Beach.

c. Conm-ercial Fishing/Recreational Fishing

Though camiercial fishing takes place off shore from

Minnesott Beach, no fishing operations originate out of the Town of

Minnesott Beach.

Recreational Fishing is limited in the municipality.

d. Peat Mining

No operations related to peat mining take place within

the town limits of Minnesott Beach. Nearest peat resource exists

approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Minnesott Beach. The presence

of resource does not directly affect the Town of Minnesott Reach.

e. Major Employment

Major employment within Minnesott Beach is associated

with the marina, Country Club and real estate interests, while major

employers outside the locality consist of the Cherry Point Marine Base

and Texas Gulf phosphate operation.

6. Existing Land Use

The town of Minnesott Beach has remained the same size

since the development of the 1980 Land Use Plan. The town's 980 acres

are still primarily undeveloped with the Minnesott Beach Golf and Country

Club being the largest amount of land use (203 acres) within the town

limits. The golf course itself takes up approximately 95% of the 203

acres with the Club House, parking lot, tennis court, and undeveloped

property comprising the balance.

Nearly 250 residential lots remain plotted but undeveloped

while over 600 acres of the town is forested and unplotted vacant

pro@erty. Based upon the town's topographic features and zoning

requirements, it is estimated that total buildout of the town would

constitute approximately 580 lots. The existing land use map (See Map/

Graphic 3 on page 12) graphically depicts the present land use profile.

In addition, the town surrounds nearly 100 unincorporated

acres bordering the Neuse River.

7. Existing Land Use Ccrrpatibility

Due to the small size and the predominance of single-family

residences and the golf course, Minnesott Beach does not experience

significant conflicts between land uses. Generally, the land uses

are well separated where development has taken place.

The State Ferry Dock operated by the North Carolina Department

of Transportation is located at the terminus of N.C. 306 at the eastern-

most point of the town. The dock itself and the traffic it generates is

not a source of complaints. There is ongoing concern surrounding the

contributing impact of the wave action along the surrounding shoreline

properties.

Map Graphic #3 1":1000,

TOWN OF
MINNESOTT BEACH

RECREATION / OPEN SPACE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

IN.
COMMERCIAL
M0.000-0 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
.00 0 00
(@o
Im MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
qoo
M GOVERNMENTAL 12
SOURCE: U.S CORPS. OF ENGINEERS PREPARED BY E.C.U. R.D.I.
P S. P

The golf course and the marina both are developed in such

a manner that blends well with the residential nature of the community.

The only related problem proves to be the inability to traverse the

town quickly due to the golf course splitting the town in half. Since

most services come from the north (i.e. fire, rescue) this does not

prove to be an insurmountable problem.

The nearby YMCA camp, Czmp Seagull, is seasonal and blends

in well with the town. No complaints or problems were raised concerning

the camp.

8. Changes in Land Use

Based upon the past, residential developrmnt will occur

at a relatively slow pace. The northwestern section of town is still

unplotted and remains a speculative area. An area off of Country Club

Drive West is still projected to be an artificial water body (lake)

with plotted single-family lots nearby. As of this writing, no action

has been undertaken or is anticipated in the near future.

Since the 1980 Land Use Plan, the development of a marina

on the western side of the golf course has taken place. Development

associated with this improved water inlet is possible.

Other changes include the development of multi-family

condominium units adjacent to N.C. 306 and the ferry dock site. This

site consists of 15 units with a second stage being planned. No other

significant changes in land use patterns has taken place.

9. Unplanned Development Potential

As mentioned, Minnesott Beach has grown from an out-of-

the-way destination point for recreationers to a residential conymmity

with recreation amenities. Those older cottages and buildings of those

by-gone days are reminders of the town's previous character.

Because the character of the town has changed and the

buildings are generally in disrepair, the older buildings are now seen

as "detractions" by some of the town's residents. Since no local

standards w-exe in effect at the time of construction, such problems

are inherent.

Through the process of incorporation and the impleTmntation

of a zoning ordinance, potential problems related to density and soil

suitability have been rectified. The existing residences and buildings

resulting from unplanned development practices represent a small portion

of the town's overall building stock. The zoning ordinance prevents

any change in these "nonconforming" uses and also limits the amount of

structural modification which is allowed to take place. Should the

structures further deteriorate to a poin t of constituting safety hazards

the local building code provisions of Pamlico County will be administered.

10. Areas of Environmental Concern

The types of Areas of Environnental Concern are designated

in Minnesott Beach. They include Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters,

Estuarine Shoreline, and Public Trust Waters. These areas are ones in

which the State of North Carolina regulates the approval of developnent

activities in"accordance with G.S. 113A-113b (Coastal Area Management

Act).

a. Coastal Wetlands

Coastal wetlands or marshlands are defined as any salt

marsh or other marsh subject to regular or occasional flooding by tides,

including wind tides (whether or not the tide waters reach the marshland

areas through natural or artificial watercourses), provided this shall

not include hurricane or tropical storm tides. Coastal marshlands also

contain some specific marsh plant species.

patches along Alligator Gut in Minnesott Beach

Smith Gut

b. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines

The estuarine waters are those bodies of waters where

fresh inland and salty coastal waters mix. This mixture produces a

nutrient-rich habitat for aquatic plants, animals, and fish. The Neuse

PUver and the nearby Pamlico Sound are both examples of estuarine

waters.

Estuarine shorelines are those non-ocean shorelines which

are especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other adverse effects

of wind and water and are intimately connected to the estuary. This

area extends fran the man high water level or normal water level along

the estuaries, sounds, bays, and brackish waters for a distance of 75

feet landward.

As an AEC, Estuarine shorelines, although characterized

as dry land, are considered a component of the estuarine system because

of the close association with the adjacent estuarine waters. Estuarine

waters and adjacent estuarine shorelines make up the most significant

components of the estuarine system in Minnesott Beach. The significance

of the estuarine system is that it is one of the most productive natural

environments of North Carolina. It mt only supports valuable ccmnercial

and sports fisheries, but is also utilized for cam-ercial navigation,

recreation and aesthetic purposes. Species dependent upon estuarines

include menhaden, shrimp, flounder, oysters, and crabs. These species

make up over 90 percent of the total value of North Carolina's comnexcial

catch. These species must spend all or part of their life cycle in

the estuary. The preservation and protection of these areas are

vitally important. The estuarine waters and adjacent estuarine shorelines

ccoprise the entire southern boundary of M3.xmesott Beach.

-approximately 2.3 miles adjacent to the Neuse River

-Alligator Gut

-smith Gut

c. Public Trust Waters

Public trust waters are partially defined as all waters of

the Atlantic ocean and the lands thereunder from the man high water

mark to the seaward limit of state jurisdiction; all natural bodies of

water subject to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the

mean high mark; all navigable natural bodies of water and lands thereunder

to the mean high water level or man water level, as the case may be.

In other words, public trust areas are waters and adjacent lands, the

use of which, benefits and belongs to the public.

In Minnesott Beach, all of the waters previously
listed as Estuarine waters.

D. DEVELOPI,= CONSTRAINTS

Constraints, both physical and man-made, represent the

limitations of growth potential placed upon the municipality.

The most significant constraint in Minnesott Beach is the

estuarine erosion area. This constraint threatens existing lands and

structures and clouds the future for other shoreline developmnt. Being

low in elevation and along the Neuse River, flood hazards are inherent

in certain locations.

Soil limitations, though cmmon throughout the region, are

not extremely severe for the low density development patterns in Minnesott

Beach. This is due largely in part to its location along the previously

mentioned Suffolk scarp.

Each Area of Envirormental Concern (AEC's) located within

Minnesott Beach constitutes a natural constraint to local development

actions.

Neither of the basic local services, the water system or

garbage collection service, stand as constraints. The lack of certain

comminity services (i.e. police, fire, wastewater treatment), could be

seen as deterrents to local development potential.

a. Estuarine erosion area

The shoreline of Minnesott Beach is a general pattern of

varying amounts of erosion. This pattern is countered with a variety

of erosion control devices inclusive of marsh grass, bulkheads, jetties,

and rip-rap, or no existing devices. At locations where prevention

techniques have been installed, further erosion has been countered. The

rate of erosion for unprotected properties, though not accurately logged

or depicted by resource accounts, has fluctuated over the past five years.

Some steep slopes exist now along the shoreline, because of the cumulative

deteriorative impact of wave and wind action.

b. Soil Limitations

one of the overriding determinants of any land use plan

is the capability of the soil types to sustain developuent. one of the

primary reasons to review the general suitability of local soils is to

assess the feasibility of future sites for certain types of development.

All of the Town's soils are classified as having sone degree of physical

limitations for development. The analysis (see page 20.) indicates the

soils found in the Town and indicates their suitability for various

purposes. The indications of the analysis are beneficial for planning

purposes only. on-site inspections would be necessary to determine

specific soil properties for any development purpose. Since each type

is rated as having certain degrees of limitations, engineering practices

and construction techniques must be utilized wherever possible to

minimize the limiting affects on development.

A definition for each rating of soil type as determined

by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service is indicated below:

Slight: Soil properties are generally favorable for the
stated use, or limitations are minor and can be
easily overcm@e.

Moderate: Scn-p- soil properties are unfavorable, but
limitations resulting from the properties can
be overcome or modified by special planning,
good design, and careful managexnent.

Severe: Soil properties are unfavorable and resulting
limitations are too difficult to correct or over-
ccn-e. Soil will require major soil reclamation
or special design for stated uses. This rating
does not in-ply that the soil cannot be used.

Very Severe: This rating is a subdivision of the severe
rating and has one or more features so unfavorable
for the stated use that the limitation is very
difficult and expensive to overcome. Reclamation
would be very difficult, requiring the soil material
to be removed, replaced, or ccupletely modified.
This rating is confined to soils that require extreme
modification and alteration, and are generally not
used for dwellings and septic tank filter fields.

These judgements are placed on several criteria inclusive

of the limitations on septic tanks, filter fields, units with/without

underground structure (basements), and local streets, roads, and playgrounds.

This information is based upon the compositions of the soil(s) and observed

limitations and is developed by the U.S. Soil and Conservation Service.

For example, observations of filter beds for on-site

disposal of sewage failing on a given kind of soil are recorded. This

relates to the slow permeability characteristic of the soil. Also,

the soil's capability to accommodate the construction of streets, road

pavements, and foundations for houses is related to the shrink-swell

(expansion) potential of the particular soil. Both of these indicators

provide basic assumptions for future site planning.

Efforts have been made within the Town's Zoning Ordinance

to direct development to take place on Alpin Soils. The limitations of

these soils in filtering leachate fran local septic tank filter fields

underscores the need for low density development. Even so, continued

development could necessitate consideration of the feasibility of a

public sewer system at a future date.

e. Community Facilities/Services

Due to the limited facilities/services (water, refuse

collection) provided by the town and their ability to met present and

projected demand for these services; constraints to development must

be viewed as those facilities/services that do not exist.

The water system's source is two wells each producing

approximately 200 GPM. Presently, the system operates at an annual

average of 12% capacity. Peak load for the water system stands at

60,000 gallons per day with a total capacity of 500,000 gallons per

day. The water tank facility has a capacity of approximately 75,000

gallons and the local water softener has a capacity of 150 GPM. Present

water customers nuTber 140 users with 76% of those being full-time users.

Due to the relative remoteness of the municipality and

the conmitment of the town not to encourage high intensity development,

SOIL TYPES: TGM OF MINNESOTT BEACH
Local
Septic Tank Dwellings without Dwellings with Streets
Soil Unit Filter Fields Basements Basenents and Roads Playgrounds

Alpin Severe - Poor Slight Slight Slight Severe
Filter Sandy

Baymeade moderate Slight Moderate Slight Severe
Wetness Wetness Sandy

Conetoe Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate

Johnston Severe, Flooding Severe, Flooding Severe, Flooding Severe, Severe, Flooding
and Wetness and Wetness and Wetness Flooding and Wetness
and Wetness

lKenansville Slight Slight Slight Slight Severe
Sandy

Leon Severe Severe Wetness Severe Severe Severe
Wetness Wetness Wetness Wetness

Rutlege Severe Wetness Severe - Wet Severe - Wet Severe - Severe Wet
Poor Filtering Wet

the lack of certain community facilities/services (i.e. wastewater)

restrains development possibilities.

Based upon present usage, the Town's water system could

service up to 1170 users. Projected build-out of Minnesott Beach would

add 580 additional users, still constituting only 61.5% of the system's

potential capacity. Also, this projection is assuming full-tirm users

which is quite unlikely given the present character of the town.

E. MAN-MADE HAZARDS

No significant man-nade hazards exist in Minnesott Beach.

F. ESTIMATED CITIZEN DEMAND/SATISFACTION

The growth potential of a municipality is also dictated by

the capability to meet service demands and the satisfaction of the

residents with the services provided. As stated, service capacity is

being met adequately for those services provided by the Town.

The following exhibit provides insight into the level

of satisfaction that exists within Minnesott Beach. The findings are

based upon the Citizen Survey which was conducted. It will be analyzed

further in a later section.

EXHIBIT 6

Crosstabulation of Vital Information
Residence Status (rows) with Public Service (columns)

No Missing
Service Excellent Good Average Poor Cpinions TOTAL Data

Public water system
Full-tine 2 20 9 6 0 37
Seasonal 4 6 5 0 0 15
Non-resident 0 11 6 2 22 41
Totals 6 37 20 8 22 93 5

Septic systein
Full-tine 7 14 7 1 5 34
Seasonal 0 5 4 2 3 14
Non-resident 1 5 6 3 25 40
Tbtals 8 24 17 6 33 88 9

Town streets
Full-tim 2 19 13 3 0 37
Seasonal 0 5 8 2 0 15
Non-resident 0 9 12 6 13 40
Tbtals 2 33 33 11 13 92 6

Drainage
Full-tim 7 18 9 4 0 38
Seasonal 0 6 5 1 3 15
Non-resident 1 8 10 2 19 40
Totals 8 32 24 7 22 93 5

Trash Collection
Full-tim 11 23 3 0 1 38
Seasonal 0 12 2 0 1 15
Non-resident 1 5 5 1 28 40
Totals .12 40 10 1 30 93 4

Recreation
Full-tine 2 7 7 18 2 36
Seasonal 0 3 6 3 3 15
Non-resident 1 7 7 5 20 40
Totals 3 17 20 26 25 91 6

Crosstabulation of Vital infonriation
Residence Status (rows) with Public Service (columns)

No Missing
Service Excellent Good Averagg Poor Opinions TOTAL Data

Town Goverruient
FV11-time 0 13 18 7 01 38
Seasonal 0 4 5 2 4 15
Non-resident 0 5 5 3 27 40
Totals 0 22 28 12 21 93 4

Fire Protection
Full-tim 3 12 14 7 0 36
Seasonal 0 5 5 2 3 15
Non-resident 0 5 7 0 28 40
Totals 3 22 26 9 31 91 6

Safety (Police) Protection
Full-time 2 7 11 14 2 36
Seasonal 0 2 3 7 3 15
Non-resident 0 3 5 1 30 39
Totals 2 12 19 22 35 90 7

Emergency Preparedness
Full-time 1 5 13 12 6 37
Seasonal 0 1 3 3 8 15
Non-resident 0 2 6 1 31 40
Totals 1 8 22 16 45 92 5

Street Lighting
Full-time 7 12 14 4 1 38
Seasonal 1 6 3 4 1 15
Non-resident 0 10 9 3 18 40
Totals 8 28 26 11 20 93 4

Rescue/Anbulance Services
Full-time 3 14 14 4 0 35
Seasonal 0 1 4 3 6 14
Non-resident 0 4 3 2 31 40
Totals 3 19 21 9 37 89 8

Crosstabulation. of Vital Information
Residence Status (rows) with Public Service (columns)

No Missing
Service Excellent Good Average Poor Opinions TOTAL Data

Aedical Services
Full-time 2 11 13 8 2 36
Seasonal 0 1 1 6 6 14
Non-resident 0 3 4 5 28 40
Thtals 2 15 18 19 36 90 7

Education
Full-time 3 7 19 5 3 37
Seasonal 0 0 5 2 7 14
Non-resident 0 5 5 4 26 40
Tbtals 3 12 29 11 36 91 6

SEMON IWO

PLANNING PROCESS

SECTION TWO: PLANNING PROCESS

A. PLAN FORMUTIATION

1. overview

The development of this land use plan was a series of

actions which attempted to establish the present situation in Minnesott.

Beach, then accumulate a record of past actions and changes related to

the town's evolution; comparing the two to understand the past direction

and project the direction that the locality is headed. A schedule (se

following page) was designed to guide the process and ensure appropriate

local input, analysis, and citizen participation.

2. Local Input

Information from local citizens was basically obtained

through a mail survey. The survey was mailed to 201 households. These

households represented full-time residents and seasonal residents, as

well as property owners within the incorporated limits. The survey

instrument (see appendix) was designed to gather opinions on various

subjects and issues which have or could be of concern in Minnesott

Beach. Local news releases and notices were also provided in order to

maxin-Lize the visibility of the process. Sixty-three percent (63%) of

the surveys were returned, tabulated by computer, and analyzed over a

series of meetings and discussions.

other highlights of the information-gathering process

were as follows:

Surveys mailed to all residents and property owners of
Minnesott Beach. The mailing was based upon water
customers and County property records. Sixty-three
percent (63%) of surveys were returned, tabulated by
computer, and analyzed.

PLANNING SCHEDULE - TOWN OF MINNESOTT BEACH

LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
1. Citizen Participation ept Oct NOV- - Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug
I. Identify local advisory group
2. Prepare citizen participation
plan
3. Develop input tools
4. Educational Efforts continuing
5. Public Awareness con t nu ing
6. Public Hearings

Il. Policy Development
1. Assess Present Conditions/
Plans/Policies
@9
2. Evaluate public concerns
3. Establish public priorities
4. Special Issue Identification
5. Draft Policy Statements
6. Review/Reassess Policy Statements
7. Finalize Policy Statements

III. Background
I . Data Collection

2. Base Map Development
3. Special Area Maps
4. Graphics Development

IV. Plan Development I
1. Preliminary Draft

2. Final Draft
J. Acceptance 4-4

- Nine meetings of the Planning Board and/or Town Council
were held and input received to guide the planning process.

- Three reviews of the planning elements were completed
with the Mayor.

- Interviews (one-on-one) with several prcminent local
residents and development interests took place during
the process.

- A day-long workshop was held at the Tbvm Hall on the
problems of shoreline erosion, protection, and nourish-
ment. officials from North Carolina State University,
East Carolina University, Division of Coastal Management,
Sea Grant Program, and North Carolina Department of
Transportation attended the workshop to offer comments,
make suggestions, and respond to questions of the local
citizens and officials.

3. Issue Identification

In addition to those policy issues prcmpted by the North

Carolina Coastal Managenent Act, several local issues were also identified.

Certain issues and the level of local concern were assessed through the

above processes and the following is a synopsis of the findings.

- SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE. Erosion continues
to be a problem along the riverfront. The impact of bulk-
heads, jetties, and nourishment on unprotected properties
continues to be a source of contention. Information gleaned
from the workshop,indicates that erosion will continue,
tempered only by natural buffers, bulkheads, and/or
jetties. This issue was raised in the previous plan, by
the Planning Board, and through the survey responses.

- ENVT_RONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS. Water quality in the Neuse,
Alligator Gut, and other nearby water bodies is of great
concern. This issue was identified in the previous plan,
by the Mayor, by the Planning Board, and through the
survey responses.

- PUBLIC AWARENESS. Despite the small size of the town,
many citizens felt that they were not aware of the actions
and policies of the Tmm. This was mentioned in the survey
responses.

- PUBLIC SERVICES. It was felt that sane public services
were good (i.e. public water and garbage collection).
Others such as fire/police, recreation, and medical
services did not rate wall. The deficiency of these
were mentioned in the survey and by the Planning Board
during its meetings.

- PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS. On this issue, the citizens were
sharply divided. hbile the majority of survey respondents
favor having a public beach, almost 28% are not in favor
of it. This issue was identified by the Mayor, the
Planning Board, via the surveys, and during the workshop.

- ENFORCEMENT TOOLS. The Town now controls development
through its zoning ordinance and CAMA enforcement regula-
tions, while the county enforces local septic tank
regulations. Public opinion was strongly in favor of
continuing and/or increasing available development controls
on the state and local levels. other tools have been
discussed, including subdivision regulations, an appearance
ordinance, and anti-bulkhead ordinances. This issue was
pointed out by the Planning Board, the Mayor, and during
the workshop.

OVERALL TCWN DEVELOPMENT. Concern was voiced over main-
taining the quality appearance of the town. Items discussed
included mobile hams, large facilities, mining and forestry
operations, and large-scale commercial developments. A
continuation of the low density,single-family development
at an accelerated pace was voiced by a sizeable portion
of respondent groups (full-time, seasonal, property owners).
The unincorporated sector of the town was also seen as a
developnent issue,

4. Intergovernmental Cooperation

In order to accurately project the actions and issues related

to the Town of Minnesott Beach, one must determine the course of Pamlico

County and the Town of Arapahoe, as well as any authorized local service

aut hority. Both goverruTent entities were contacted and discussions were

held to determine any actions, policies, or regulations which could impact

the Town of Minnesott Beach. Also, persons responsible for developing

plans which would impact Mimesott Beach were contacted for information.

The following intergovernmental services were reviewn-d.

Their present situation as well as future plans were taken into consi-

deration in the development of the Town's policies. A synopsis of these

services and plans appear below:

Proposed
Service/Action Unit of Government Actions/Plans

Sewer Service County Authority Phased sewer service
does not include
Minnesott Beach

Rescue/Emergency County Authority Continuing present
operation

Law Enforcement Pamlico County Continuing present
operation

Education Pamlico County No capital improvement
plans directly impacting
Minnesott Beach

Sanitary Landfill Pamlico County No plans directly impacting
M3-nnesott Beach

Fire Town of Arapahoe Existing situation
continuing

Recreation Pamlico County No developiwnt sites
located in minnesott Beach

Building Permit Pamlico County Continuing present
operation

The following individuals were contacted and used for

coordination in the assessment of the local situation and the develoFment

of this plan:

Vicki Deal . . . . . . . . . . .Pamlico county sanitarian
William Rice . . . . . . . . . .County Manager
Charles Toler . . . . . . . . .County Planner/Emergency Coordinator
Betty Mason . . . . . . . . . .Pamlico County Recreation Coordinator
*Tim Beatley . . . . . . . . . .Planner, Coastal Resources
Collaborative, Ltd.
Randy Beaman . . . . . . . . . .Tax Supervisor
Soil Conservationist . . . . . .U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service

*Preparing Pamlico County Land Use Plan.

5. Current Plans, Management Tools, and Policies

Currently, the Town of Minnesott Beach has developed only

one managerrent tool requiring local administration., The town did adopt

a zoning ordinance and acccrrpanying zoning map since the last land use

planning cycle. A local zoning administrator reviews all plans prior

to them being sent to the building inspector for county approval. The

town did not develop a subdivision ordinance. But scnv-- restrictive

covenants do still exist for a majority of the town's developed area.

All building permits, electrical permits, and plumbing

permits are issued by Pamlico County. Health-related permits are issued

by the County Health Department.

The town depends upon State and Federal enforcement officials

to regulate development actions impacted by State and Federal environmental

laws.

The implexmntation of local policies is limited to the

application of the zoning ordinance and the inplementation steps called

for in the 1980 land use plan. A synopsis of the status of those policies

appear on page 34 (Exhibit 8).

B. 1980 POLICY EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW

The Town has experienced a wide range of results related to

the application of its previously adopted policies (1980 Plan).

The zoning ordinance, as adopted, is designed as a framework

to further the town's desired development pattern. Tn addition, it has

sought to ensure environmental integrity in the town through its low

density and recognition of certain soil limitations. Further environmntal

consideration is exhibited in the ordinance through its identification of

11conservation" areas and restrictive developnent practices throughout

these areas.

Since the adoption of the 1980 Land Use Plan, the Town of

Minnesott Beach has seen mostly detached, single-family residential

development within its corporate limits. This type of housing development

has been consistent with the relevant adopted policies. The vast

majority of the residential development has been on inland properties

and not along the Neuse River.

No evidence of policy action inconsistent with the environmental

concerns noted in the 1980 Plan have been indicated during the planning

process.

Fifteen multi-family units (Sea Gull Villas) have been

constructed since 1980 adjacent to the shoreline. These units were built

on approximately six acres of property previously designated commercial

properties (C-2). The zoning was changed to allow this construction

(Phase 1). The placement of mobile homes on this property would have been

allowable under this zoning change, thus being in conflict with Policy 9.

A second phase and third phase are planned for the remainder of the

designated RM district. Upon ccmpletion, the site will have eleven

structures (55 individual units) on the entire six acres.

The other zoning change involved another small site for

multi-family units near the marina (See page 64).

A subdivision ordinance for Minnesott Beach did not

materialize over the planning period contrary to Policy 8. This did not

prove to be an insurmountable problem for the town as development occurred

in previously subdivided parcels only.

Though the new housing construction has been primarily

in the inland sections of town, the problem of estuarine shoreline erosion

has r>ersisted for existing residences. Faced with conflicts between the

retention of personal property and the lack of viable alternatives the

Town was not able to follow through with Policy 2. No disallowance of

the use of erosion control structures was embodied into the local zoning

ordinance. The town has viewed the problem as one which must continue

to be reviewed to be sure that appropriate actions are taken by both

the town and individual property owners. The town did incorporate into

its zoning ordinance appropriate setback requirements which would minimize

potential property damage from estuarine shoreline erosion.

Camiercial development has been very limited in Minnesott

Beach. Those changes have been in connection with the expansion of the

local marina. The marina stands as part of the man-made amenities which

the town's residential growth has been contingent upon over the last

decade. All development has been consistent with federal and state

policies governing the development of marinas in the coastal area. The

local government has supported the enforcement of such requirements

consistent with Policy 6, Policy 4, and Policy 15.

The services of the town have remained limited due to

its geographic isolation and small population base. Recognizing Policy

11, the town has reviewed and investigated certain possibilities and

alternatives to the present situation. No feasible alternatives Were

reached during the planning period.

The town walks a line between developing amenities which

will attract tourists and those which will improve the quality of life

for. its citizens. Waterfront development and beach access are two of

the delicate points on that line. Because of the possible implications

of a waterfront development and lack of funding sources for a planning

study, the town has not pursued Policy 14. The lack of beach access for

the citizenry still poses a local problem. Though potential properties

have been identified, requests for funding their acquisition is not

anticipated due to the-managerrent and maintenance costs involved.

No incidents or charges concerning degradation of any

environmental elements were brought by any state or federal office

during the planning period. The town did not seek any permits from

the Army Corps of Engineers or N.C. Coastal Management Program. The

town has continued its participation in the National Flood Insurance

Program.

EXHIBIT 8 - 1980 LOCAL POLICIES*

Policy Related
Number Policy Actions

1 The Tbwn recognizes the 1) The denser zoning classification
in-portance of helping to prevent corresponds with the Alpin
further significant deterioration soil type. This soil type is
of the water quality of the Neuse characterized by poor filtration
River. when too many septic tanks are
installed.

2) No subdivision regulations have
been adopted for the Tbwn of
Minnesott Beach.

2 The Tbwn desires to ensure that 1) The zoning ordinance does
shoreline developmnt does not not effectively deal with
significantly harm the estuarine this problem.
system. Furthermore, alterations
to the shoreline in terms of 2) No subdivision regulations
erosion-control structures will have been adopted for the
not be permitted by the Town on Town of Minnesott Beach.
the Neuse River, but will be lef t
to individual landowners in other
areas.

3 The Tbwn recognizes the environ- 1) Coffstal wetlands have been
mental value of coastal marshes deEdgnated in the local
and desires to protect them from zoning ordinance.
significant damage.
2) Conformance to state and
federal laws is included
within the zoning ordinance.

4 The Town will not restrict the 1) Recognition of land uses
public's right to navigation in adjacent to public trust areas
public trust areas and wishes to is allowed for but standards
perpetuate their biological value. are generalized.

2) No adverse land use designations
are identified on the zoning
map adjacent to public trust
areas.

5 It is the policy of the Town to 1) Regulations regarding open
encourage the retention of space and vegetation as related
vegetation, preserve open space, to the "conservation" areas
and to allow the natural terrain are included in existing
to be disturbed as little as ordinance.
possible.
2) No on-going public education
programs exist.

*Adopted in 1980 Tbwn of Minnesott Beach Land Use Plan.

Policy Related
Number Policy Actions

6 The Town will not permit develop- 1) Zoning densities are low
ment or land uses which will intensity (R-20) (R-15)
degrade the quality of the surface throughout the municipality.
waters, groundwater, or signifi-
cantly lower the water quantity in 2) Flood regulations are being
the aquifer. enforced locally.

7 The Town is primarily a residential 1) Little applicability to the
camunity and therefore does not Tom's resources or potential
desire to promote agriculture, development pattern.
forestry, mining, fisheries, industry,
energy facilities, or tourist-
related recreation.

8 The Town will develop a zoning 1) Zoning ordinance has been
ordinance and subdivision regu- developed, adopted, and is
lation based upon the capacity of being implemented.
the area to support development and
with concern for environment. 2) Subdivision ordinance has
not been developed for
adoption.

9 The Town desires to maintain 1) The municipality has limited
primarily single-family detached the amount of area for high
residential development as well density residential development.
as limited and well maintained
multi-family town house units. The 2) County/municipal cooperation
Tbwn does not desire further mobile has assured proper building
home use. design and maintenance.

10 The ccmmercial zone proposed on the 1) ComTercial space has been
draft zoning map is acceptable as provided for in zoning
constituted and will not be increased. ordinance but reduced from
Uses permitted in this zone will be original size.
only those which are necessary to
supply basic needs of the town
residents.

11 The Town will continue to develop 1) No changes have occurred in
and study alternatives to the current fire and policy protection
fire and police protection problem. services. The development of
fire protection has been
limited to Arapahoe. Some
discussion of purchasing fire
equipment has taken place.

Policy Related
Number Policy Actions

12 The Town will design its zoning 1) Within the constraints of
map using the capability of the existing soil limitations,
soils to acccnucdate on-lot sewage the zoning map of Minnesott
disposal to limit densities on Beach has been designed.
those soils unsuitable for on-lot
sewage disposal.

-13 The Town will continue to study the 1) Scme additional upgrading
road problems associated with Country of streets and roadways has
Club Drive and Country Club Drive been acccmplished through
West. The Tbwn will continue to Powell Bill funds.
attempt to gain further citizen
support to actively pursue improve-
ments and set aside funds for such
improvements. off road vehicles are
not considered to be a problem and no
policy is necessary at this time.

14 The Town will attempt to seek grant 1) No waterfront redevelopment
or loan funds to complete a study on plan has been developed.
the waterfront area to determine
alternatives for its redevelopment.

15 The Town does not oppose the continued 1) No municipal action for
state maintenance of roads, the CAMA implementation was necessary.
program, the Army Corps of Engineers
jurisdiction over wetlands and naviga-
tion, and continued operation and main-
tenance of present system.

16 The Town does not desire the location 1) No municipal action for
of major facilities in or near the implementation was necessary.
ccnrmnity.
17 The Tbwn will seek to acquire 1) No efforts are being made
waterfront property. to implement this policy.

SECTION THREE

POLICY FORMULATION

TABLE 2-33

MANATEE

GENERAL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL
WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS

FALL/ WET SEASON

STATION MANIA MAN2B MAN3
PARAMETER WET (0) WOT SFT STANDARD
TEMPERATURE (c) 28 29 23 NA

SALINITY (PPT) 28.5 30 27 NA

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/1) 6.5 3.5 NA 4

DISSOLVED OXYGEN
(% SATURATION) 95.6 53.4 NA NA

TURBIDITY (NTU) 2.9 2.1 4.4 NA

CONDUCTIVITY (mhos) 35700 37600 36100 NA
PH 6.0
7.8 7.6 7 8.5

NOTES

NA REFERS TO DATA NOT AVAILABLE

VALUES DETERMINED WITH THE D.O. METER.

REMARKS.
STANDARD REFERS TO WATER QUALITY STANDARDS IN PREDOMINATELY
MARINE WATERS, CHAPTER 17-3 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
FOR LESS III WATERS.

DAMES & MOORE
TABLE 2-33

CmTnission. The most inportant areas to be identified for protection

are the Areas of Environimntal Concerns (AEC's) (See Map/Graphic 4

on next page)t These dynamic, natural features of the environment represent the

most sensitive and valuable assets of the unique coastal environment

of North Carolina. These areas are limited in Minnesott Beach in both

size and number. This does not diminish the responsibilities to enact

thoughtful policies that will maintain their integrity.

Coastal wetlands exist around the edge of Alligator Gut

near the present marina facilities and along Smith Gut. Their protection

is needed to ensure productive nursing areas for aquatic life.

Also, the estuarine waters, which exist in Minnesott Beach

are considered public trust waters. The identified policy deals with

the management of these waters/areas and the prevention of development

encroachment upon their capability to support ccnn-ercial and recreational

fisheries, wildfowl habitat, or to serve as an aesthetic resource.

The quality of the estuarine system, of which these are

components, is directly related to the quality of the marine food chain

along the North Carolina coast. in addition, the natural attractiveness

of these components are elements of the lure that attracts people to live

by or near our waters.

The estuarine shoreline (area extending 75 feet landward

of the mean high waterline of the estuarine waters), because of occasional

flooding and the erosive effects of some tidal action, can have a direct

impact upon the quality of the estuarine waters. Because of the conflict

between the local government's attempts to maintain shoreline property for

public and private use while minimizing the adverse impact on adjacent

estuarine water quality, a suitable policy and actions have been developed.

*Note: These maps depict the general location and extent of areas
designated as Areas of Environmental Concern.

MAP/C:ffHiv 4 -I"= 1000'

TOWN OF
MINNESOTT, BEACH-
A12F-A--e>

:@A-5TAL vJgTLA4PS
EF-STLJAI?lr4E: WATEV6,

PREPARED By E.C.U. R.D.I.
39 RS.P

Parts of the estuarine shoreline of Minnesott Beach have experienced

varying degrees of erosion over the past five years.

The adopted policy,attempts to achieve the delicate balance

between certain local needs and the overall environmental good. A review

of those ABC's located in Minnesott Beach are as follows:

a. Coastal Wetlands

As defined, coastal wetlands are regularly flooded salt

marsh areas containing certain plant species. Though very small in size

and productivity, coastal wetlands do exist in Minnesott Beach in the

Alligator Gut and Smith Gut (See Map/Graphic on page 39). The town

recognizes the importance of these areas for conservation.

b. Estuarine Waters/Shorelines

These two (ABC's) Areas of Environmental Concern constitute

the bulk of the local municipality I s management concerns. Approximately

2.8 miles of estuarine shoreline with adjacent estuarine water exists

in Minnesott Beach (See Map/Graphic 3 on page 12). These consist of the

Neuse River and Alligator Gut areas.

C. Public Trust Waters/Areas

These waters and their adjacent lands are defined in part

as all water of the Atlantic ocean and lands thereunder from the man

high water mark to the seaward limit of state jurisdiction; all natural

bodies of water subject to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder

to the rnean high water mark, all navigable natural bodies of waterlands

thereunder to the mean high water level or man water level. These

waters and their adjacent areas are those which benefit and belong to

the public. Policies to ensure the maintenance of these areas include:

THE TOM DESIRES TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT
(INCLUSIVE OF RESIDENCES, COMMERCIAL USES, AND MAP=%IAS) DOES NOT
SIGNIFICANTLY HARK THE ADJACENT ESTUARINE WATERS (AEC) OR THE
OVERALL ESTUARINE SYSTEM.

ACTION ONE: ESTABLISH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPRbPRIATE
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRECAUTIONS.
ALTION TWO: APPROACH THE STATE FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE DETERMINATION
OF LOCAL SEDIMENT MOVEMENT AND ACCEPTABLE REPLENISHMENT ALTERNA=S.
ACTION THREE: NO ZONING CHANGES WHICH ARE INCONSISTENT WITH 15
NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE) WILL BE ALLOWED IN ORDER
NOT TO PERMIT DETRIMENTAL LAND USES ADJACENT TO ESTUARINE WATERS.
ACTION FOUR: SEEK PROTECTION AGAINST THE DESTRUCTION OR WEAKENINI@
OF ANY NATURAL BAPRIM AGAINST EROSION.
ACTION FIVE: SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND
REGULATIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THE ESTUARINE SHORELINE AND
ESTUARINE WATERS,

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL MINI]MIZE SHORELINE EROSION
PROBLEMS WITHOUT ADVERSELY DTAcTING THE AFOREMENTIONED AREAS OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC's).

THE TcwN WILL NOT RESTRICT THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO NAVIGATION IN
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS (AEC) TO PERPETUATE THEIR BIOLOGICAL VALUE.

ACTION ONE: DISALLOW ANY LAM USE DESIGNATIONS ADJACENT TO
PUBLIC 'TRUST AREAS THAT ARE INCONSISTEN T WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE) .
ACTION TWO: PR=E APPROPRIATE STANDARDS WITHIN THE LOCAL CONTROL
ORDINANCES (ZONING AND SUBDIVISION) FOR THOSE ACCEPTABLE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: TfiE TOM WILL ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DEFINED BY TBE NORTH CAROLINA, COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.

THE TOM RECOGNIZES THE ENVIROMMAL VALUE OF COASTAL LANDS
(AEC) AND DESIRES TO PRO= THEr4 FROM SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE.

ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN DESIGNATION OF WETLANDS WITHIN THE LOCAL
ZONING ORDINANCE.
AMON 'IWO: DISALLOW ANY LAND USE DESIGNATTONS THAT ARE INCON-
SISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H, (NORTH CAROLINA, ADMINISTRATIVE CODE). (EXAMPLES
ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS, FISHING PIERS, DOCKS, AGRICULTURAL USES, AND/OR
DRAINAGE USES) .

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF
COASTAL MARSHES AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.

2. Development in Areas with land Constraints (Hazards or Fragile
Characteristics

a. Flood/Erosion Hazards

Due to the town's location'along the Neuse River, some

water-related constraints are exerted upon the town's develoFment.

Such natural hazards as estuarine flooding are minimized due to the

town's relatively high elevation. only three structures exist within

the designated flood hazard zone. (See Map/Graphic 5/6 on pages 44-45) .

The above condition actually accentuates problems related

to estuarine erosion that occur along the banks of the Neuse River.

The shoreline of Minnesott Beach shows a pattern of varying

levels of erosion impact. over the last 30 years the shoreline has

eroded over 75 feet, with shoreline elevations ranging from less than 5

feet to nearly 20 feet. The pattern has been countered with a variety of

erosion control devices inclusive of marsh grass, bulkheads, jetties,

and rip-rap. At some locations, no existing devices exist. The rate

of erosion, though not accurately logged or depicted, has fluctuated

greatly over the past five years. At some points, erosion is

minimal while at other points steep slopes exist. The aforementioned

Erosion Workshop held in Minnesott Beach was the basis of local policies

related to this problem.

b. Soil Limitations

Soils, as previously mentioned, exert certain constraints

on local development. These limitations were previously outlined when

their inherent problems were discussed. In Minnesott Beach, the soil

types dictate that the installation of all septic tanks be approved by

the County Health Department. The ability of the soils to support

proposed structural foundations is determined by the Pamlico County

Building Inspector with assistance of the Soil Conservationist.

c. Slope

As previously stated, the slope of Minnesott Beach's

topography is relatively flat with scme roll that approaches 5% grade.

These are not development constraints. The steep enbankments along the

Neuse River do represent significant constraints to future developuent.

Such conditions are prompted by tidal action along the Neuse River.

d. water supply

The principal source for the public water supply for the

M:innesott Beach water system is the Castle Hayne aquifer. This highly

productive artesian is the same source for many public water supplies

in the area. This aquifer ranges from 200 to 400 feet in thickness and

is composed of indurated shell limestone, domesticated shell limestones,

and beds of calcearous sand. The water is characteristically hard with

low chloride content, but highly productive.

Even though Pamlico County is underlain by thousands of

feet of sedimentary deposits only the upper few hundred feet contain

fresh water. In the western part of the county the depth to salty water

is in excess of 400 feet. This limestone aquifer is capable of yielding

several thousand gallons per minute of fresh water to individual wells.

The ability of the limestone to yield fresh water diminishes east of

Minnesott Beach. There are sands and shales of the upper sandy aquifer

overlying the limestone which can yield up to a few hundred gallons per

minute to individual wells. The maximm groundwater yield is estimated
at 1.0 (Mgal/d)/mi2. Water from deep wells both in the upper sandy and

limestone aquifers tends to be very hard and alkaline, and may contain

excessive iron. The lower sandy aquifer contains only salt water within
the county.1 Explanation of local actions to maintain the quality of
iPublic water Supplies of North Carolina, N.C. Department of Natural
and Economic Resources, January, 1977.

-44

N-1

TOWN OF 0 0
"o, "o
MINNESOTT BEACH

00
ozo,00,0,0 0
0
HAZARDSICONSTRAINTS .0,00000
0000
0 0 0
0 0
00

SEVERE SOIL, LIMITATIONS

SHORELINE EROS(oN

ASA*

*Note: Archaec)109ical Semitive Area
44 PREPARED BY

MAP/GRAPHIC 6

I*'= 1000,

. ... .....

TOWN OF
MINNESOTT BEACH

HURRICANE FLOOD
HAZARD MAP

TYPE I Ek 2 STORMS 8'5

3 12!

4 Ek 5 17'

45 E.CU. R.01. Ps.p

water resources are identified under Subsection F.

Based upon the local situation (public system, low density)

the potable water supply would not appear to be a development constraint

for Minnesott Beach. The capability of the present system to provide for

the local need appears to be adequate well beyond the end -of the planning

period (See page 21). Adopted policies within this text should further

reinforce the potential quality and quantity of the existing potable water

resources to serve the needs of Minnesott Beach.

e. Man-made Hazards

These hazards are recognized as large facilities, structures,

or inan-related action which would impede or restrict development options

in a given area. No significant hazards have been identified but the

ferry dock and the public water tank could be construed as potential

deterrants to land development. Neither has been identified as a

prominent issue during the planning process. The existence of Cherry

Point Marine Base and its local flight pattern close to Minnesott Beach

is not construed as a hazard by local residents. Agreements with the

base preclude flights directly over the town itself. In order to deal

with the presence of certain hazards (natural or man-made), the following

policies are issued:

THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO ENFORCE THE ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE AND
ITS INTENT INCLUSIVE OF DENSITY, SETBACKS, AND CONSERVATION AREAS.

ACTION ONE: MA=AIN LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS
BASED UPON SOIL LIMITATIONS.
ACTION TWO: REVIEW DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS (i.e. CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENTS, ETC.) WITHIN PRESENT R-M DISTRICT.
ACTION THREE: LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
WITHIN THE TOWN.
ACTION FOUR: MAINTAIN THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN INCLUSIVE OF COASTAL WETLANDS, ESTUARINE
SHORELINES, AND PUBLIC TRUST AREAS WITH ALL PERMIT LAND USES BEING
CONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE).

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE AS A RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY COMPRISED MAINLY OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITH RECOGNITION
OF VALUED ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES.

f. Soil Resource Protection

The Town will continue to minimize soil loss and water

degradation problems prompted by stormwater drainage.

The Town will not dictate individual soil retention practices

along the Neuse River but will encourage efforts that are canpatible

with CAMA standards and nearby control devices. only uses permitted under

the Town's zoning ordinance will be allowed along this area.

THE TCM WILL NOT PERMIT LAND DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES WHICH WILL
DEGRADE LOCAL FRAGILE LAND AREAS, QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS, GROUNDWATERS,
OR SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THE QUANTITY OF WATER IN THE AQUIFER.

ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN PRESENT LAND DENSITIES WHICH WILL ENCOURAGE
THE CONTINUATION OF CONVENTIONAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
BASED UPON SOIL SUITABILITIES.
ACTION TWO: CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE ENFORMoUM OF IOCAL AND
STATE HEALTH DEPARTHHENT REGULATIONS CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK
INSTALLATION/OPERATION.
ACTION THREE: WILL DEVELOP SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPROPRIATE
DRAINAGE GUIDELINESPI LOT DESIGN STANDARDS, AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ALONG
WATER OUTLETS.
ACTION FOUR: CONTINUE TO ENFORCE LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE TO MINIMIZE
POTENTIAL SHORELINE EROSION.

PECTED RESULTS: THE TCM WILL ENSURE THE MAINTENANCE OF
FRAGILE LAND AREAS AND WATER QUALITY IMPA= BY TBEIR JURISDICTION
THROUGH AVAILABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TOOLS (I.E. ZONING, SUBDIVISION)

g. Cultural Resource Fragile Areas

Mm-inesott Beach may have been one of the earliest settled

areas in the county. Its sheltered position along Neuse River may have

been conducive to settlement during the eighteenth century. Artifacts

and sites, how-ever, from this earlier period are now underwater due to

shore erosion. A comnunity was not formed here until the 1920s, but

the area was settled and fanned before that time. The town, as it

exists today, began in the 1920s as a unincorporated riverside resort.

Minnesott Beach then served as a resort for much of Pamlico County and

and eastern North Carolina. Because of hurricanes, many of the 1920's

buildings were demolished. Due to the loss of these early buildings, no

structures appear on the states historic survey. A vast majority of the

buildings have been built since incorporation. (see Hazards/constraints)

BEFORE ANY LAND ALTERATION TAKES PLACE IN THE ASA SITE, APPROPRIATE
STATE OFFICIALS WILL BE NOTIFIED.

ACTION ONE: THE MINNESOTT BEACH PLANNING BOARD WILL MONITOR FUTURE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CHANGES IN THE SPECIFIED SITE.

Minnesott Beach realizes certain natural resource fragile

areas exist other than those designated as Areas of Environmental Concern

(AEC's). The soils, waters, and naturally forested areas can maintain a

native wildlife throughout the comnMity as well as certain natural balance.

THE TOWN TRILL NOT PERMIT LAND DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES WHICH WILL DEGRADE
LOCAL FRAGILE LAND AREAS, QUALITY OF SURFACE WATEM, GROUNDWATERS, OR
SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THE QUANTITY OF WA!TER IN THE AQUIFER.

ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN PRESENT LAND DENSITIES WHICH WILL ENCOURAGE
THE CONTINUATION OF CONVENTIONAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
BASED UPON SOIL SUITABILITIES.
ACTION TWO: CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF LOCAL AND STATE
HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK
INSTALTATION/OPERATION.
ACTION THREE: WILL DEVELOP SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPROPRIATE
DRA@E GUIDMMSTES! LOT DESIGN STANDARDS, AND BUFFER. REQUIREMENTS ALONG
WATER OUTLETS.
ACTION FOUR: CONTINUE TO ENFORCE LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE TO MINIMIZE
POTENTIAL SHORELINE EROSION.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ENSURE THE MAINTENANCE OF
FRAGILE LAND AREAS AND WATER QUALITY IMPACTED BY THEIR JURISDICTION THROUGH
AVAILABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TOOLS (I.E. ZONING, SUBDIVISION).

3. Stom Hazard Mitigation, Post Disaster Recovery and Evacuation
Plan Needs

An entire section (see page 57) is included separately

for the hazards associated with hurricane and flood evacuation. Also

discussed are the hazards associated with post-stonn redevelopment

problems.

B. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT

Minnesott, Beach does not have significant productive

resources that require management strategies to be developed. Certain

subject areas are included as they relate to the development of the

natural landscape.

1. Agriculture

No policies necessary (see pagelo

2. Commercial Forestry

No policies necessary (see page@o

3. Mining Resource Areas

No policies necessary (see pagelo_).

4. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries

No policies necessary (see page @O

5. Off-Road Vehicles

The Town of Minnesott Beach does not have off-road vehicle

problenis along the shoreline but has encountered problenis along the

shoulders of local streets. This problern is addressed on page 53.

6. Residential and Commercial Land Development

The town's geographic size and past growth pattern indicate

a moderate level of developnent potential over the planning period. The

desire to maintain quality residential development with some commercial

space remains the town's direction. Both types of development will.be

guided by the local management tools, existing or proposed. Further

elaboration on local actions and policies will be provided in the

following section.

C. ECONOMIC AND CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,

1. Desired Land Developrmnt/Redevelopment

a. Residential/Ccmnercial Development

. As previously stated, the Town of Minnesott Beach is basically

residential with only peripheral ccmnercial developmnt. The town has

taken some gradual steps in addressing these problems through a zoning

ordinance but recognizes further steps are needed to ensure that proper

developmnt actions are taken in the future. The town wishes to maintain

its character of predominantly single-family residences without completely

excluding multi-family residences.

The town wishes to liTnit commercial development and gradually

upgrade the appearance of the existing commercial area. The town recognizes

that upgrading of the appearance of this area will be a gradual process

that is primarily dependent upon individual property owners. The

following policies will apply to residential and ccmmercial development

in Minnesott Beach.

THE TaqN WILL ENACT A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND CONTINUING TO ENFORCE
A LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE, EACH HELPING TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR THE MAINITNANCE OF LOCAL ENVIROMAENTAL FEATURES, THE ACCEPTA-
BLE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

ACTION ONE: ESTABLISH PROCESS FOR THE REVIEW OF ALL PTIATS AND/OR
PROSPECTIVE DEVELOP= PLANS.
ACTION TWO: ENFORCE ACCEPTABLE LOT, STREET, DENSITY, AND AMENITY
DESIGN STANDARDS.
ACTION THREE: LIMIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION FOUR: PROVIDE FOR ENVIR011-1ENTAL FFATURES AND LIMITATION OF
STOR41ATER RUNOFF THROUGH THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF THE RETENTION OF VEGETATION,
PRESERVATION OF OPEN-SPACE, AND MINIMLM DISTURBANCE OF THE NATURAL TERRAIN
AS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY ACTIONS SPELT OUT IN THE LAND USE PLAN.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOW WILI, ESTABLISH A SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE WHICH WILL GUIDE ANY FUTURE SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT OR
REPIATTING OF EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS.

THE TCtqN WILL NOT OPPOSE REDEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL
AREAS WITHIN THE TrWN LIMITS.

ACTION ONE: WILL MAINTAIN DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL AREA AS DESIGNATED
BY THE ADOPTED ZONING MAP.
ACTION TWO: MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITH ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTION THREE: WILL SEEK WAYS TO ATTRACT COMMERCIAL SERVICES AS
NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY.
ACTION FOUR: WI1L WORK AS NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY WITH COUNTY TO
ENFORCE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REGULATIONS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE CONTINUATION OF A LIMITED COMMERCIAL
AREA WITH A GRADUAL UPGRADING OF SERVICES AND STRUCTURES.

b. Desired Industry or Facilities Siting

Due to the town's cormitment to maintain a residential

character in the future, no desire to attract or promote industry is

indicated. The following policy underscores the intent of the town.

THE TaWN DOES NOT DESIRE TO PROMOTE AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, MINING,
FISHERIES, INDUSTRY (LIGHT OR HEAVY), ENERGY FACILITIES, OR THE LOCATION
OF ANY MAJOR FACILITY IN OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE COMMUNITY.

ACTION ONE: WILL ENFORCE ALL STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS
(I.E. ZONING) RELATED TO TEE OPERATION OR PLACEMENT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED
ACTIVITIES.
ACTION TWO: WILL NOT EXTEND SUCH SERVICES AS TO PROMOTE SUCH LAND
USES OR FACILITIES.

EXPECTED RESULTS: NO ACTIONS TO PRCMOTE THE LOCATION OF
THE MENTIONED FACILITIES OR ACTIVITIES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE TOM.

2. Local Ctmnitment to Service Provisions

a. Service Adequacy

Since water service, garbage collection, roads, and street lights

are the only services provided by the town, they constitute the greatest

immediate concern by the governing board. Each of these proved to be at

a satisfactory level, both in present provisions and projected capacity

-needs. The continuing improvement of locally-mintained streets was the

only local service which was mentioned with any regularity. This concern

was consistent with the 1980 Land Use Plan.

one service, the treatment and disposal of wastewater, is

done on a individual basis. Minnesott Beach is fortunate that its

topography and soil types make it atypical for Pamlico County, where many

sites for individual septic tanks are unsuitable.

The projected development of a centralized wastewater system

for other parts of the County does not include Minnesott Beach. The

anticipated system costs makes the construction improbable at the present

time.

The only other viable alternative for wastewater treatment

in Minnesott Beach is the introduction of Package Wastewater treatment

facilities. These smaller versions of conventional central wastewater

treatment facilities are ccmmonly used to treat and dispose of wastewater

from multi-unit residences.

With the present low density development pattern and the

advantageous local conditions, the introduction of a policy concerning

package treatment plant facilities is not warranted.

Due to the travel distances involved and the relatively sparse

population concentration of southern Pamlico County, certain other services

(fire, police, and rescue) %,ere identified by local residents. In

addition, the limitations of these services surfaced repeatedly during

public discussions.

Through recognizing citizen concerns, certain limitations on

the perfect resolution of these issues include the small tax bases of

Minnesott Beach and nearby Arapahoe, the lack of population numbers and

concentration, and the average age of the residents. Taking these

limitations into consideration, significant financial outlays and

total dependence upon volunteer assistance are not suitable answers.

The following policies were adopted to guide improved public services

within these limiting factors.

THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO UPGRADE LOCAL ROADS THROUGH AVAILABLE
REVENUE SOURCES.

ACTION ONE: IDENTIFY AND PRIORITIZE I= ROAD NEEDS TO BE
ADDRESSED THROUGH AVAILABLE LOCAL AND STATE FUNDS.
ACTION TWO: NOT PERMIT OPERATING OF UNLICENSED MOTOR VEHICLES
OFF OF PUBLIC ROADS EXCEPT FOR OWNER OF PROPERTY.
ACTION THREE: PRCMOTE PROPER ROAD DESIGN PRACTICES THROUGH THE
ADOPTION OF A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE
MUNICIPAL ROAD SYSTEM.

THE TW WILL INVESTIGATE CERTAIN OPERATIONAL CHANGES INCLUSIVE
OF COMBINATION OF SERVICES WITH OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. IN ADDITION,
THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY LOCAL FUNDS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN SYSTEMS
THAT WILL AUGM[M THE PRESENT LEVEL OF SERVICE.

ACTION ONE: EXAMINE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROTECTION ALTERNATIVES
INCLUSIVE OF A COMMUNITY WATCH APPROACH.
ACTION TWO: EXAMINE FIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES/
RESPONSE TIME WITHIN I= COMMUNITY AND ESTABLISH CHANGES WHERE NECESSARY.
ACTION THREE: COMPARE PROJECTED LOCAL COST OF SERVICES WITH
NEARBY COMMUNITIES AND SIMILAR SIZE CUMMUNITIES.
ACTION FOUR: IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE UPDATED LIST OF HEALTH CARE
INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR SPECIALTIES WITHIN THE CCMUNITY TO SUPPLEMENT
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL TANE SUCH ACTION TO MODIFY
OR INITIATE THE PROVISION OF AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICES AS APPROPRIATE
BASED UPON FINDINGS.

b. Citizen Awareness

In addition, the level of commmication by local goverrment

and the level of understanding of its prevailing policies was viewed by

the public as unsatisfactory. In order to deal with this identified

development constraint, the following policy and actions were developed.

THE TIOWN DESIRES TO ESTABLISH BETTER. COMMUNICATION WITH DEVELOP=
INTERESTS, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND EXISTING CITIZENRY.

ACTION ONE: UPGRADE CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH LOCAL MEDIA.
ACTION TWO: IMPROVE PUBLIC EXPOSURE OF ESTABLISHED POLICY DECISIONS
BY HOLDING NO LESS THAN ONE MEETING PER YEAR TO REVIEW POLICY-REIATED ACTIONS.
ACTION THREE: ESTABLISH PUBLIC INPUT PROCEDURES WITHIN FRAMEWORK
OF ALL PIANNING AND POLICY DOCUMENTS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL SEEK TO IMPROVE CITIZEN
KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS OF LOCAL EFFORTS AND ACTIONS.

3. Beach and Waterfront Access

Due to its strategic location along the shores of the Neuse

River, Minnesott Beach is a potential location for public access to the

water. Results of the citizen survey showed a pro-access sentiment (54%)

and survey remarks also indicated a discouragement concerning the lack of

access to the water by local residents.

Steps were taken during the planning process to identify

potential sites and funding arrangexmnts. Three existing sites were

identified as available sites for consideration as public beach access

points. The three sites constituted the only vacant property located

along the Neuse River. Two of the sites are under individual ownership

while the third is shoreline part of the Minnesott-Beach Country Club

property. Both individual lots are located adjacent to private residences

with limited space for off-street parking. Due to reservations that remain

concerning the local capability to deal with the long-range financial

impact (i.e. maintenance) and potential liability problems, the following

policy was adopted.

THE TOM WILL SEEK ALTERNATIVES IN OBTAINING AND IMPROVING
WATERFRONT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS.

ACTION ONE: THE TOM WILL APPROACH PAMLICO COUNTY ABOUT DEVELOPING
A SITE TO SERVE THE MINNESOTT BEACH-ARAPAHOE AREA.
ACTION TWO: ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO
INVESTIGATE AND IDENTIFY OPTIONAL SITES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE TOWN.
ACTION THREE: THE TGWN WILL CONTINUE TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL
LONG-TERM FINANCIAL CUNMMVIENT RELATED TO A BEACH ACCESS SITE.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL PURSUE THE MOST OPTIMUM
SITE FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS ALONG THE NEUSE RIVER.

4. floating Marina/Devel2pnent Homes

The occurrence of citizens using boats as full-tine residences

has not been a problem in Minnesott Beach. Such practices have been known

to increase untreated discharge in local waters and concentrate water-related

problem in channels which have limited tidal movement.

The town will continue to monitor such actions in the area of

the local marina but does not feel any policy action is warranted.

The local marina has expanded over the previous planning period

but has limited, additional roan to expand its operation.

In addition, the present zoning classification scheme limits

marine-related development to the existing marina area. Any expansion

in-pacting local waters is under the jurisdiction of programs identified in

the following section and its policy declaration.

5. Ccmmitnent to State and Federal Programs

The Town of Minnesott Beach recognizes the need for state

and federal program assistance.in the management of certain environmentally

sensitive areas. The following represents a policy ccmmitment to continuing

support within their jurisdiction.

THE TOW DOES NOT OPPOSE THE CONTINUED STATE MAINTENANCE OF ROADS,
THE NORTH CAROLINA, COASTAL MANAMIENT PROGRAM, THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS JURISDICTION OVER WETLANDS AND NAVIGATION, AND CONTINUED
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ITS NAVIGATION SYSTEM.

ACTION: NO ACTION NECESSARY.

D. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Minnesott. Beach recognizes that an open approach to dealing

with public problems is the most responsible way to chart qovernrwntal

direction and identify policies to bTplement it. Throughout the course

of this planning process, the local government has sought public input

and opinions.

A public participation plan was designed and adopted in the

early stages of the process. The plan has been adhered to throughout

the period. The plan stated that public involvement would be generated

through local planning board, citizen surveys, one-on-one discussions,

and eventually public information meetings. In addition, local newspapers

would be used to advertise and promote the workings of the planning process.

Policies related to public information understanding and

awareness are identified in Section 3, Subsection D-2.

In reviewing the public opinion results, several observations

were made with respect to citizen satisfaction. Reaction to public water

service, town streels and trash collection, each appeared to maintain a

moderate to high level of satisfaction.

Fire protection, recreation, rescue service, and medical

service, each indicated a "below average" level of satisfaction. These

services are provided by other govexm-ents and the time and travel distance

from Minnesott Beach impacts their level of service.

Results concerning eni-xgency preparedness service showed a

lack of knowledge by the respondents. This conclusion will be addressed

in later sections of the document.

Safety or police protection scored low in the results and

was considered a problem which must be addressed in the future.

E. STOM HAZARD MIGATION, POST DISASTER RECOVERY, AND EVACUATION PLANS

1. Discussion

The North Carolina coast has been subjected to scn-e notable

hurricanes and northeasters since rreterological records have been kept.

These hurricanes have ccinbined wave, wind, and flooding damage throughout

Pamlico County in the past.

Minnesott Beach has not been subjected to a severe h urr icane

since its incorporation. With its beneficial topographic features, high

wind velocities pose the greatest threat to the entire conuunity. Thirty-

nine structures along the Neuse River shoreline would be subjected to

the erosive effects of the wave action of a storm.

Due to the limited access (Highway 306) to the Town,

highway flooding poses the greatest threat should evac uation of the

town be necessary.

Below are the storm hazards and their potential impact

on Minnesott Beach.

a. Winds

Hurricane winds are those sustained winds of over 73

miles per hour and may reach gust speeds approaching 200 miles per hour.

All properties are essentially subject to wind damage with mobile homes

and older structures being the most susceptible. Due to the town's recent

developnent. (84.4% of the homes built between 1970-1980), most-of the

residences are considered structurally-sound. The presence of the one

mobile home park could prove to be a serious problem should damaging

winds occur. Nearly all of the mobile hones are seasonal residences.

b. Flooding

.Minnesott Beach would not be subject to extensive flooding

should a hurricane strike. Depending upon the strength of the hurricame

only a small portion of the town is projected to experience flooding

problems (See page 61). only three residences are located within the

boundaries of the projected 100 year flood line.* The estimated cumulative

value of these residences is between $90,000 and $140,000. The remainder

of Minnesott Beach is outside of this category and subject only to minimal

flooding.

c. Wave Action (Erosion)

Due to its location along the Neuse River, Minnesott Beach's

estuarine shoreline is subject to storm-related erosion. Shoreline

erosion could lead to loss of property through waterfront erosion and

subsequent undermining of existing structures.

2. Storm Hazard Mitigation Policies

In order to minimize the potential damage caused by the

impact of a hurricane or other major storm, the Town of minnesott Beach

has adopted certain policies (see page 60). It is evident that the

majority of actions related to these policies are conducted by other

levels of.government, and is not within the power of the town government

of Minnesott Beach to provide enforcement. Mierever applicable, the

town will utilize its available legal and organizational resources to

deal with problems generated by coastal storms.

*(Ref. Pamlico County Flood Insurance Rate maps).

3. Hurricane Evacuation Plan

One of the most pressing times for intergovernmental

cooperation to ccm into play is when it is for the safety of human

lives. Minnesott Beach recognizing that role, has developed policies

(see page _�1) to ensure the most efficient, effective relocation of

its citizens in the event of an amergency.

a. Hurricane Conditions

The following represent the 5 levels of conditions identified

by the Pamlico County Emergency Management office.

Condition 5 - Hurricane Season (June 1 thru December 30)
Condition 4 - Alert - H urr icane Advisory
Condition 3 - Hurricane Watch or approximately 48 hours
to forecasted landfall
Condition 2 - Hurricane Warning or approxm-ately 24 hours
to forecasted landfall
Condition 1 - 12 hours or less to forecasted landfall
Re-Entry - Threat removed or damage assesscmnt follows.

b. Hurricane Emergency Actions

Each locality is notified by the Emergency Management

Coordinator that the Emergency Operating Center is being opened when

Condition 4 exists. Support groups from each part of the County are

expected to rreet at that office at that time. Tim schedules and

scenarios for each potential occurrence prompted by the storm are

developed. Such planning is based upon individual storm conditions

(i.e. wind strength, direction, speed of movement). Based upon these

determinations, local contact people are mobilized to alert citizens

of the following:

1) when to evacuate

2) where to evacuate

3) how to evacuate

4) any other necessary safety information

Two shelters have been identified - Pamlico Technical

College and Fred A. Anderson Warehouse. The former is the location

that citizens of Minnesott Beach would be relocated. This facility

will house approximately 650 people.

c. Re-Entry/Clean-Up

Subsequent to storm damage investigations, the evacuees would

be allowed to return to their residences. This will be based upon the

judgenent of the County Emergency Management coordinator. The town will

enforce Chapter G - Health Protection and Disease Prevention of its

General Ordinances upon the return of its citizens. Through this

enforcement, properties shall be the responsibility of those persons

holding deed to the property in question. Residents will have 15 days

upon notification to comply with the provision of this ordinance.

d. Post Disaster Recovery

The town recognizes the need to adequately respond to

the needs of the citizenry following the impact of a major storm or

hurricane (see page U ). The town, due to its limited resources, will

depend chiefly upon the following:

1. Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
2. County Sheriff
3. County Building Inspector
4. Water Department Head
5. Director of Social Services
6. County Tax Supervisor

Certain action priorities will be set depending upon the

specific problems generated by the storm. These actions will be consistent

with such policies adopted by the plan. All damage assessments, identifi-

cation of problems, and dissemination of necessary information to property

owners will be coordinated with this group.

e. Long Term Recovery/Reconstruction

In compliance with Article IV, Section 3 of the Minnesott

Beach Zoning Ordinance, the restoration of structures within the town

will be allowed. Non-conforming structures or structures on non-confor-

ming properties will not be permitted to be restored if damage exceeds

75% of the assessed value. 'Wherever the jurisdiction of state and federal

policies are applicable, representatives frcm. the appropriate agency will

be contacted for a determination.

f. Moratoria Alternative

Due to the confusion and immediate hardships that a building

moratorium can cause after a natural disaster, the enactment of a building

moratorium is not foreseen. Non-conforming structures or structures on

non-conforming properties will not be permitted to be restored as stated

in Subsection E. Since the Town is under the jurisdiction of the County

Building Inspection Program, such a decision could be subject to County

action.

The following policies have been adopted to deal with the

local actions associated with hurricane-related evacuation and destruc-

tion.

THE TOM WILL ENSURE THAT ALL ASPECTS OF A HURRICANE EVACUATION
PLAN IMPACTING THEIR OCMMTY ARE ADEQUATE.

ACTION ONE: COOPERATE WITH COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS IN REVIEWING
AND EVALUATING CURRENT ENACUAT'ION PLANS.
ACTION TWO: WILL ASSIST IN A PUBLIC AWARENESS EFFORT THROUGHOUT
THE CUMMUNITY.
ACTION THREE: WILL 'WORK WITH PAMLICO COUNTY TO ASSURE THAT ALL
CITIZENS ARE PROPERLY AWARE OF HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: A SAFE AND EFFICIENT EVACUATION AND
RE-ENTRY OF MINNES0Tr BEACH IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTBER.
NATURAL DISASTER.

THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY A STEERING COMMITTEE TO GUIDE ALL POST-
HURRICANE CLEAN-UP AND DEVELOPMENT, UTILITY REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT,
SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPOINTMENT OF A COUNTY TASK FORCE.

ACTION ONE: WORK THROUGH THE COUNTY TO ENSURE THAT ALL PERMITTED
RECONSTRUCTION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOPTED COUNTY BUILDING CODE AND
LOCAL ORDINANCES (I.E. ZONING, HEALTH PROTECTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION).
ACTION TWO: ASSURE THAT ALL RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS IN FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE REDEVELOP-
MENT ACTIONS TARE PLACE IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTHER NATURAL
DISASTER.

CONCLUSION

The preceeding policies and actions represent the genuine concerns

and intentions of the Town of Minnesott Beach. The policies dictate

the underlying philosophies of the town goverm-ent and its constituents,

while the actions delimit the steps of implementation to accomplish such

philosophies.

one must understand the limitations placed on small town goverm@ents.

From the lack of professionally-trained administration to a limited tax

base, =y of the actions outlined for implementation will be dependent

upon volunteers serving on local boards and comnittees. It is felt the

actions represent reasonable and legitimate steps to ensure that local

issues are dealt with in a satisfactory manner over the plarming period.

SBCrION FOUR

LAND a[ASSIFICATION SYSTEM

SECTION FOUR: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

A. OVERVIE@ AM PURPOSE

The land classification system, which was devised at the

inception of the North Carolina Coastal Management Act, provides a

framework through which the present and future use of land can be

identified for local governments. It also provides some relationship

between the graith patterns desired for each of the counties and

municipalities under the jurisdiction of the Act. It does not act as

a zoning guide (See page 68). As stated:
"a land classification system provides a framework
to be used by local governments to identify the
future use of all lands. The designation of land
classes allows the local government to illustrate
their policy statemnts as to where and to what
density they want growth to occur, and where they
want to conserve natural and cultural resources
by guiding growth." (7B.0204) (b)

B. DESCRIPTION

The system provides for five (5) designations of land use

and developrmnt patterns. They are: Developed, Transition, Ccmunity,

Rural, and Conservation. In general, "Developed" and "Transition" are

classified as the most intense develoFment patterns which presently

require or anticipate the installation of urban services. "Ccmminity"

is established for 1cwe-r density developmnt patterns not having or

requiring sewer services. Agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction,

or other low intensity uses are classified as "rural." "Conservation"

stands as the classification for the "long-term management and protection

of significant or irreplaceable areas."

C. CATEGORIES

1. Developed

The "developed" class of land use provides for continued

intensive development and redevelopment of existing cities or municipa-

lities. Areas to be classified as "developed" include lands developed

essentially for urban purposes or approaching a density of 500 dwellings

per square mile which are provided with usual municipal services,

inclusive of water and sewer service, police and fire protection.

Minnesott Beach does not have any land classified as "developed." Public

opinion, identified in the citizen survey, public input, and existing plans

show no indication that a sewage treatment facility is planned nor feasible

for Minnesott Beach.

2. Transition

The "transition" is the only class that signifies a change

over the planning period. "Transition" land is classified as those lands

providing for future intensive urban development within an area over the

ensuing ten years. Lands that are most suitable and that will acconnodate

necessary public utilities and services are necessary prerequisities of

the designation. The class may also designate areas for additional growth

when additional lands in the developing class are not available or when

they are severely limited for future development.

Lands classified as "transition" may include:

. lands currently having urban services, but lacking
"developed" characteristics.

. lands necessary to acccmmodate the population and
econcmic growth anticipated within the planning period.

. areas which are, or will be in, a "transition" state
of development (i.e. going from a lower intensity
developnent pattern to a higher* intensity development
pattern, of which will eventually require urban services).

Minnesott Beach presently has two areas that meet the minimum

*exceeding three residential units per acre

"transition" criteria. These areas include the following:

1. 6+ acres bordered by Highway 306, Country Club Drive,
and the Neuse River.

2. 4.35 acres bordered by Neuse River Drive, and the
marina facility.

Both of these areas were designated for multi-family

developent in the original land development plan (1974) but were not

zoned as such on the town's zoning map. All areas are now zoned as R-M

(multi-farnily) that were designated for multi-family residences originally.

The first area has three existing structures with each

structure containing 5 residences. Eleven structures or 55 residences are

planned for the entire site in three phases. An on-site disposal system

is presently serving the structures. The County Sanitarian has given

approval to 2 proposed structures which will also be served by an on-site

system. The six remaining structures will be served by an off-site system

approximately 112 mile North along N.C. Highway 306. Final approval is

still pending on this system.

The second site is 4.35 wooded acres which recently was

re-zoned from ccnuercial (C-2) to multi-family residential (R-M).

Preliminary plans call for 12 residences in two 3-story condcminiums

which will be primarily marketed to boat owners and retirees. Based upon

these preliminary plans, it is anticipated that the final development will

exceed three residential units per acre. No formal site plans have been

sulanitted for consideration. The County Sanitarian has approved an off-

site system for the project.

Based upon discussions with the local sanitarian, each site

can support the expected demand due to the existing groundwater levels and

favorable soil characteristics in the Minnesott Beach area. Since

Minnesott Beach is not part of the projected service area of a Countywide

Sewer System and a municipal system does not appear to be feasible in

the foreseeable future, these areas will continue to be served by

individual system but will be classified as "transition".

3. Ca=-Lity

The "Ccnnunity" classification provides for clustered land

uses to meet housing, shopping, employment, and public service needs within

rural areas. It is usiially characterized by a small grouping of mixed

land uses which are suitable and appropriate in clusters of rural develop-

ment not requiring municipal sewer service. "Ccoaunity" may have water

service and certain other municipal services.

Due to the existing development pattern, Minnesott Beach is

basically classified as "Ccnrmity." (See Map/Graphic 7).

The town has reitterated the desire to limit those areas

that higher density (multi-family) developnent could occur through its

initial development plan, 1980 Land Use'Plan, and the adopted zoning

ordinance. Though the acceptable density of the multi-family areas

exceed the threshold for a "transition" classification, it does not appear

that further intensification beyond a "ccmuunity" classification will occur.

This is based upon the lack of urban-type services projected for the town

and applicable policies set forth by the town.

4. Rural

The "Rural" class provides for agriculture and forest

nonagement, mineral extraction and other low intensity uses over a

large area. Such lands are identified as appropriate locations for

resource management and allied uses; land with high potential for

agriculture, forestry or mineral extraction; lands with one or more

1 imi tations that would make development costly and hazardous, and,

land containing irreplaceable, limited, or significant natural,

recreational, or scenic resources not otherwise classified.

MAP/GRAPHIC 7a

. .... SCALE
EXISTING ZONING
1:1000'

. . .. ......

.. n.

..........
..........
........... .....

...... .....
........... ........... .....
...... ....

.. ... .. ....
...... ............
....... ...........
. .......... I.. ........
..........
....... ............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.............

...... . . . . .

............ .

TOWN OF
. ........... ......
MINNESOTT BEACH
... .......
..........

............
R-20RESIDENTIAL
....... ...

R-15RESIDENTIAL

C-1 CO)WIWERCIAL
C-m @OMMERCIAL MARINE
R-M RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY
SOU PCE: U.S. CORPS. OF ENGINEERS 68 PREPARED By E.C.U. R.D.I.
PS.P

No area of Minnesott Beach is classified as "rural" but

the vast majority of the area surrounding Minnesott Beach is classified

as such.

5. Conservation

The final land use category, according to CAMA guidelines,

is the "Conservation" Class, which provides for effective long-term

management of significant, limited, or irreplaceable natural resources.

Also, certain other areas of cultural, recreational, productive, or

scenic value, may also require similar "effective long-term management."

Examples could include major wetlands (other than statutorily defined

coastal wetlands); especially undeveloped shorelines that are unique,

fragile, or hazardous for development; lands that provide necessary

habitat conditions (especially for remnant species; pocosins, or publicly

owned water supply watersheds and aquifers).

The designation "Conservation" does not imply "non-use,"

but does imply a need for careful and cautious management of any permitted

use. Within any lands designated "Conservation," any proposal, or applica-

tion for development actions should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Minnesott Beach has two general areas of "conservation."

(See Map/Graphic 7). Those areas are those previously mentioned as AEC's

(Areas of Environmental Concern) and the golf course (open space) area.

D. POLICIES RELATED TO LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

1. Camn-inity

The Town does not wish to cmmt to any new service obliga-

tions. Also, extension or expansion of present service capabilities is

not desired and will not be necessary based upon the implementation of

this plan's policies. No adopted policy reflects any intention by the

town to pursue such services that would promote intensive development.

Thus, the town has adopted such policies that would maintain a "comrunity"

classification and not transcend into a denser development pattern as

identified by a "transition" classification.

2. Transition

All actions and policies related to development density within

Minnesott Beach signify the position of maintaining a predominantly single-

family comminity with a low density pattern. No policy has been adopted

that would accelerate or expand the development of malti-family residential

areas beyond the present designated areas. Policies concerning limiting

service obligations related to land demands will continue. Such policy

positions will effectively suppress more intensive development pressure

outside the "transition" areas.

3. Conservation

All policies maintain action that would limit development

pressure upon these identified areas.

4. Developed

Classification does not apply to Minnesott Beach and no

indication is seen that it will in the foreseeable future.

5. Rural

This classification does not apply to the Town of Minnesott

Beach.

SCALE
I" a 1000'
Map Graphic #7

...........

..............
..............

...............

................
TOWN OF
............
MINNESOTT BEACH
.............

LAND CLASSIFICATION

CONSERVATION
El

TRANSITION

COMMUNITY
Note: NA OUTSIDE MUNICIPALITY
SOURCE: U.S. CORPS. OF ENGINEERS PREPARED By E.C.U. R.D.I.
PS.R

SEMON FIVE

POLICY SYNOPSIS

SECTION FIVE: POLICY SYNOPSIS

A. OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE

The following provides a central location for policy referral

by the local government. This section allows for an identification of all

policies and actions that will be enforced over the planning period.

Throughout the planning process, ideas and suggestions for

alternative action were raised in order to establish discussion and local

reactions. Many of the alternatives are discounted because of a lack of

feasi-bility or being ill-timed for this conmmity.

It is hoped this section provides a framework for the

planning efforts of the Tbwn of Minnesott Beach.

B. LISTING AND ALTERNATIVES

POLICY ONE

THE TOM DESIRES TO ENSURE THAT EMM SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT'
(INCLUSIVE OF RESIDENCES, CWMCIAL USES, AND MARINAS) DOES NOT
SIGNIFICANTLY HARM THE ADJACENT ESTUARINE WATERS (AEC) OR THE OVERALL
ESTUARINE SYSTEM.

ACTION ONE: ESTABLISH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPROPRIATE
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRECAUTIONS.
ACTION TWO: APPROACH THE STATE FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE DETERMINATION
OF LOCAL SEDIMENT MOVEMU AND ACCEPTABLE REPLENISHMENT ALTERNATIVES.
ACTION THREE: NO ZONING CHANGES WHICH ARE INCONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC
7H (NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE) WILL BE ALLOWED IN ORDER NOT TO
PERMIT DE==AL LAM USES ADJACENT TO ESTUARINE WATERS.
ACTION FOUR: SEEK PROTECTION AGAINST THE DESTRUCTION OR WEAKENING
OF ANY NATURAL BARRIER AGAINST EROSION.
ACTION FIVE: SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF ALL APPLICABLE RULES
AM REGULATIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT' IMPACTTNG THE ESTUARINE SHORE-
LINE AND ESTUARINE WATERS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL MINIMIZE SHORELINE EROSION
PROBLEMS WITHOUT ADVERSELY IMPACTING THE AFOREMENTIONED AREAS OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC's).

ALTERNATIVES: - ALLOW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS (SUBDIVISION) TO
PLAN THEIR DESIGN WITH ONLY APPLICABLE REGULATIONS'
FOR LOT SIZE.
- NOT APPROAM STATE AGENCIES OR OFFICES CONCERNING
BEACH REPLENISHMENT NEEDS.
- ALLOW INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS TO SEEK SHORELINE
REPLENISHMENT' APPROACHES TO THEIR PROPERTY.

POLICY TWO

THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO UPGRADE LOCAL ROADS THROUGH AVAILABLE
REVENUE SOURCES.

ACTION ONE: IDENTIFY AND PRIORITIZE LOCAL ROAD NEEDS TO BE
ADDRESSED THROUGH AWJABLE LOCAL AND STATE FUNDS.
ACTION TWO: NOT PERMIT OPERATING OF UNLICENSED MOTOR VEHICLES
OFF OF PUBLIC ROADS EXCEPT FOR OMER OF PROPERTY.
ACTION TBREE: PROMOTE PROPER ROAD DESIGN PRACTICES THROUGH SUB-
DIVISION ORDINANCE.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE MUNICIPAL
ROAD SYSTEM.

ALTERNATIVES: - ALLOW ACTIONS WHICH WOULD DAMAGE RCADKAYS AND
SHOUIDERS.
- NOT DEVELOP APPROPRIATE ROADWAY DESIGN GUIDELINES
THROUGH PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
- UPGRADE ROADS TO STATE STANDARDS AND SEEK STATE
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE.

POLICY THREE

TBE TOWN WILL NOT PERMIT LAND DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES WHICH WILL DEGRADE LOCAL
FRAGILE LAND AREAS, QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS, GROUNDWATERS, OR SIGNIFI-
CANTLY LOWER THE QUANTITY OF WATER IN THE AQUIFER.

ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN PRESENT LAND DENSITIES WHICH WILI, ENCOURAGE
TBE CONTINUATION OF CONVENTIONAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
BASED UPON SOIL SUITABILITIES.
ACTION TWO: CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE ENFORCE@T OF LOCAL AND
STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK
INSTALLATION/OPERATION.
ACTION THREE: WILL DEVELOP SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPROPRIATE
DRAINAGE GUIDELINES, LOT DESIGN STANDARDS, AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AMONG
WATER OUTLETS.
ACTION FOUR: CONTINUE TO ENFORCE LOCAL ZONITJG ORDINANCE TO MINIMIZE
POTENTIAL SHORELINE EROSION.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL ENSURE TBE MikINTENANCE OF
FRAGILE LAND AREAS AND WATER, QUALITY IMPACTED BY THEIR JURISDICTION
THROUGH AVAILABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TOOIS (I.E. ZONING, SUBDIVISION).

POLICY FOUR

THE TOWN RECOGNIZES THE ENVIRORv!ENTAL VALUE OF COASTAL WrLANDS
(ABC) AND DESIRES TO PROTECT THEM FRaM SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE.

ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN DESIGNATION OF WEI%ANDS WITHIN THE LOCAL
ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTION TWO: DISALLOW ANY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT ARE INCON-
SISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H, (NORTH CAROLINA, ADMINISTRATIVE CODE). (EXAMPLES
ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS, FISHING PIERS, DOCKS, AGRICULTURAL USES, AND/OR
DRAINAGE USES).

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF
COASTAL MARSHES AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.

ALTERNATIVES: ELIMINATE "WE'TLANDS" DESIGNATION WITHIN
ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE.

POLICY FIVE

THE TOM WILL NOT RESTRICT THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO NAVIGATION IN
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS (AEC) TO PERPETUATE THEIR BIOLOGICAL VALUE.

ACTION ONE: DISALLOW ANY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ADJACENT TO PUBLIC
TRUST AREAS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE) .
ACTION TWO: PROVIDE APPMPRIATE STANDARDS WITHIN THE LOCAL CONTROL
ORDINANCES (ZONING AND SUBDIVISION) FOR THOSE ACCEPTABLE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.

ALTERNATIVES: DISREGARD THE TOWN'S IMPACT UPON ADJACENT
PUBLIC TRUST WATERS.

POLICY SIX

THE TOWN WILL ENACT A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND CONTINUING TO ENFORCE
A LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE, EACH =2ING TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES, THE ACCEPTA-
BLE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

ACTION ONE: ESTABLISH PROCESS FOR THE REVIEW OF ALL PIATS AND/OR
PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
ACTION TWO: ENFORCE ACCEPTABLE LOT, STREET, DENSITY, AND ADolENITY DESIGN
STANDARDS.
ACTION THREE: LIMIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION FOUR: PROVIDE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND LIMITATION OF
STOR*QATER RUNOFF THROUGH THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF THE RETENTION OF VEGETATION,
PRESERVATION OF OPEN-SPACE, AND MINIMUM DISTURBANCE OF THE NATURAL TERRAIN
AS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY ACTIONS SPE7T OUT IN THE LAND USE PLAN.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ESTABLISH A SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE WHICH WILL GUIDE ANY FUTURE SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT OR
REPLATTING OF EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS.

ALTERNATIVES: - NOT ENACT A LOCAL SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
- NOT INCLUDE PROTECTIVE CONSIDERATION FOR
VEGETATION, OPEN SPACE, AND NATURAL TERRAIN.

POLICY SEVEN

THE TOM DES IRES TO ESTABLISH BE7= CC1*1UNICATION WITH DEVELOPMENT
INTERESTS, PROPERTY OWNFlRS, AND EXISTING CITIZENRY.

ACTION ONE: UPGRADE CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH LOCAL MEDIA.
ACTION TWO: IMiPROVE PUBLIC EXPOSURE OF ESTABLISHED POLICY DECISIONS.
ACTION THREE: ESTABLISH PUBLIC INPUT PROCEDURES WITHIN FRAMURK
OF ALL PLANNING AND POLICY DOCUMENTS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL SEEK TO IMPROVE CITIZEN
KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS OF LOCAL =RTS AND ACTIONS.

ALTERNATIVES: - MAINTAIN SAME PUBLIC COMUNICATION CHANNELS.
- NO ACTION.

POLICY EIGHT

THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO ENFORCE THE ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE AND
ITS INTENT INCLUSIVE OF DENSITY1 SETBACKS, AND CONSERVATION AREAS.

ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN LOW-DIENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS
BASED UPON SOIL LIMITATIONS.
ACTION TWO: REVIEW DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS (I.E. CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENTS, ETC.) WITHIN PRESENT R-M DISTRICT.
ACTION THREE: LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
WITHIN THE TOWN.
ACTION FOUR: MAINTAIN THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN INCLUSIVE OF COASTAL WETLANDS, ESTUARINE
SHORELB@ES, AND PUBLIC TRUST AREAS WITH ALL PERMITTED LAND USES BEING
CONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORrH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE)

POLICY NINE

THE TOM WILL NOT OPPOSE REDEVEWPMENT OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL
AREA WITHIN THE TOM LIMITS.

ACTION ONE: WILL MAINTAIN DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL AREA AS DESIGNATED
BY THE ADOPTED ZONING MAP.
ACTION TWO: MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITH ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTION THREE: WILL SEEK WAYS TO ATTRACT COMMERCIAL SERVICES AS
NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY.
ACTION FOUR: WILL WORK AS NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY WITH COUNTY TO
ENFORCE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REGULATIONS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE CONTINUATION OF A LIMITED COMMERCIAL
AREA WITH A GRADUAL UPGRADING OF SERVICES AND STRUCTURES.

ALTERNATIVES: - LIMIT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATION.
- ADOPT LOCALLY ENFORCED BUILDING CODES.

POLICY TEN

THE TOWN WILL INVESTIGATE CERTAIN OPERATIONAL CHANGES INCLUSIVE
OF COMBINATION OF SERVICES WITH OTHER LOCAL GOVElWdENTS. IN ADDITION,
THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY LOCAL FUNDS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN SYSTEMS
THAT WILL AUGMENT THE PRESENT LEVEL OF SERVICE.

ACTION ONE: EXAMINE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PR(YTECTION ALTERNATIVES
INCLUSIVE* OF A CCMMUNITY WATCH APPROACH.
ACTION TWO: EXAMINE FIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES/
RESPONSE TIME WITHIN LOCAL COMMUNITY AND ESTABLISH CHANGES WHERE NECESSARY.
ACTION THREE: COMPARE PROJECTED LOCAL COST OF SERVICES WITH
NEARBY COMMUNITIES AND SIMILAR SIZE COMMUNITIES.
ACTION FOUR: IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE UPDATED LIST OF HEALTH CARE
INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR SPECIALTIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY TO SUPPLMM
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL TAKE SUCH ACTION TO MODIFY
OR INITIATE THE PROVISION OF AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICES AS APPROPRIATE
BASED UPON FINDINGS.

ALTERNATIVES: - NO ACTION.

POLICY ELEVEN

THE TOWN WILL SEEK ALTERNATIVES IN OBTAINING AND IMPROVING
WATERFRONT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS.

ACTION ONE: THE TOM WILL APPROACH PAMLICO COUNTY ABOUT DEVELOPING
A SITE TO SERVE THE MINNESOTT BEACH-ARAPAHOE AREA.
ACTION TWO: ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO
INVESTIGATE AND IDENTIFY OPTIONAL SITES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE TOM.
ACTION THREE: THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL
LONG-TEFM FINANCIAL COMMITMENT RELATED TO A BEACH ACCESS SITE.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL PURSUE THE MOST OPTIMUM
SITE FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS ALONG THE NEUSE RIVER.

ALTERNATIVES: - PURSUE THE POTENTIAL LOCATION OF A LOCAL
BEACH ACCESS SITE.
- SEEK LOCAL FUNDING FOR DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

POLICY TWELVE

THE TOWN WILL ENSURE THAT ALL ASPECTS OF A HURRICANE EVACUATION
PLAN IMPACTING TBEIR CCMMUNITY ARE ADEQUATE.

ACTION ONE: COOPERATE WITH COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS IN REVIEWING
AND EVALUATING CURRENT EVACUATION PLANS.
ACTION TWO: WILL ASSIST IN A PUBLIC AWARENESS EFFORT THROUGHOUT
THE CCMMUNITY.
ACTION THREE: WILL WORK WITH PAMLICO COUNTY TO ASSURE THAT ALL
CITIZENS ARE PROPERLY ADORE OF HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS.

EXPECTED RESULTS: A SAFE AND EFFICIENT EVACUATION OF
MINNESCTT BEACH IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR MEER NATURAL DISASTER.

ALTERNATIVES: - NO LEGITIMATE ALTERNATIVE.

POLICY THIRTEEN

THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY A STEERING COMMITTEE TO GUIDE ALL POST-
HURRICANE CIEAN-UP AND DEVELOPMENT, UTILITY REPAIR AND/OR REPIACR4ENT,
SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPOINTMENT OF A COUNTY TASK FORCE.

ACTION ONE: WORK THROUGH THE COUNTY TO ENSURE THAT ALL RECONSTRUCTION
IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOPTED COUNTY BUILDING CODE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.
ACTIO14 TWO: ASSURE THAT ALL RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS IN FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE DEVELOP-
MENT ACTIONS TAKE PLACE IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTHER NATURAL
DISASTER.

ALTERNATIVES: - NO ACTION.

POLICY FOURTEEN

THE TOM DOES NOT DESIRE TO PROMOTE AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, MINING,
FISHERIES, INDUSTRY (LIGHT OR HEAVY), ENERGY FACILITIES, OR THE LOCATION
OF ANY MAJOR FACILITY IN OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE CObWJNITY.

ACTION ONE: WILL ENFORCE ALL STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS
RlM.ATED TO THE OPERATION OR PLACED= OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ACTIVITIES.
ACTION TWO: WILL NOT EXTEND SUCH SERVICES AS TO PROMOTE SUCH LAND
USES OR FACILITIES.

EXPECTED RESULTS: NO ACTIONS TO PROMOTE THE LOCATION OF
TBE MENTIONED FACILITIES OR ACTIVITIES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE TOM.

ALTERNATIVES: - CHANGE THE RESIDENTIAL NATURE OF THE
MUNICIPALITY.
- NO EXPRESSION OF OPPOSITION.

POLICY FIFTEEN

THE TOM DOES NOT OPPOSE THE CONTINUED STATE MAINTENANCE OF ROADS,
THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MA111AGEMENT PROGRAM, THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS JURISDICTION OVER WETLANDS AND NAVIGATION, AND CONTINUED
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ITS NAVIGATION SYSTEK.

ACTION: NO ACTION NECESSARY.

POLICY SIXTEEN

BEFORE ANY LAND ALTERATION TAKES PLACE IN THE ASA SITE, APPROPRIATE
STATE OFFICIALS WILL BE NOTIFIED.

ACTION ONE: THE MINNESOTT BEACH PLANNING BOARD WILL MONITOR FUTURE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CHANGES IN THE SPECIFIED SITE.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A

TOWN OF MINNESOT]r BEACH

LAND USE PLAN

Citizen Survey

1. PERSONAL

NOTE: Please check the following answers as they apply to you or your family:

1. Which of the following best describes your residence status?

a. Full-time Resident

b. Seasonal Resident

c. Non-resident Property Owner

2. If you are either a full-time or seasonal resident, how long have you resided or had a residence in Min-
nesott Beach?

a. more than 10 years c. 1-5 years

b. 5-10 years d. less than 1 year

3. If you are either a seasonal resident or non-resident property owner, do you plan to move to Minnesott
Beach on a permanent basis within the following time frames?

a. 1 year c. 3-5 years

b. 1-3 years d. do not plan to move there or unsure

4. Please indicate thertumber of persons in your household who fit in each age category:

a. 0-5 years e. 36-45 years

b. 6-17 years f. 46-55 years

c. 18-25 yej g. 56-65 years

d. 26-35 years h. over 65 years

5. Which of the following best describes the head of household's employment status?

a. full-time employed c. unemployed

b. part-time employed d. retired

6. Which of the following best corresponds with your household's total income?

a. below $10,000 d. $30,001 to $40,000

b. $10,001 to $20,000 e. $40,001 to $50,000

c. $20,001 to $30,000 f. above $50,000

11. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS

NOTE: Please circle the word or phrase with which you agree.

7. Minnesott Beach has grown at a (TOO RAPID, ACCEPTABLE, TOO SLOW, NO OPINION) rate over
.the past five years.

8. Minnesott Beach has handled its growth over the past five years in an (ACCEPTABLE, UNACCEPTABLE,

NO OPMON) manner.

9. 1 (AGREE, DISAGREE, NO OPINION) that Minnesott Beach should construct a public sanitary
sewerage system.

10. The present types of local regulatory control over growth and development are (TOO STRICT,

ACCEPTABLE, TOO LENIENT, NO OPINION).

11. Please rank in order 1 through 5 the following types of development (1 being most preferred, and 5
being least preferred):

a. apartments d. mobile homes

b. condominiums e. commercial establishments

c. single-family homes

111. LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

NOTE: Please circle the letter which best represents your level of concern with the following:

12. The quality of water of the Neuse River:

a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion

13. The quality of water of Alligator Gut (Marina):

a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion

14. The preservation of wetlands in the area:

a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion

15. The environmental impact of individual septic systems:

a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion

16. Coastal environmental problems in general:

a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion

IV. GENERAL POLICIES

NOTE: Please circle the response which best describes your feelings.

17. The Town of Mu'mesott Beach should exercise more regulatory control over the growth of the town.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

18. The State of North Carolina should provide increased direction over development along the coast of
North Carolina.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

19. The State of North Carolina should provide increased direction over development along the Neuse
- River.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

20. More policies concerning growth and development of Minnesott Beach are needed to guide its
future.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

21. The present policies of the Town are working well in guiding its future.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE 'NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

22. The Town should try to obtain land for public beach access.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

23. The Town should allow development of condominiums in the area from the ferry dock to the existing
pier.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

24. The intent of the Town's policies is understood by. the general population.

STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

V. PUBLIC SERVICE

NOTE: Please rate the adequacy of the following services to the best of your knowledge (circle your response).

25. Public water system