[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
Coastal Zone information Center March 1977 State of Rhode Island Department of Economic Development D 20 12023 D Facilities Study KEYES ASSOCIATES architects /engineers / planners 'One on oasta0q3l rrna I Ent 0 ti 1q3 P er 4V6(, h Rhode Island, Department of Economic Development C, Aes:, 5, 4P. FACILITIES STUDY FOR QUONSET POINT TECHNICAL PARK FINAL REPORT "This study was financed in part by a technical assistance grant awarded the State of Rhode Island by the Economic Development Administration." PREPARED FOR THE LL RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BY 4=4 KEYES ASSOCIATtS-ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/P.LANNERS US Department of Commerce NOAA Coastal Services Center Library 2234 South Hobson Avenue Charleston, SC 29405-2413 MARCH 1977 The preparation of this plan was financed in part by a planning grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the provisions of the Coastal Zone Management -583), through the Act of 1972 (Public Law 92 Intergrated Grant Administration Program. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view's or policies of the sponsoring agencies. 't, 0@ This publication is based upon publicly- supported research and may not be copyrighted. It may be reprinted, in part or in full, with the customary crediting of the source. 321 South Main Street Senior Associates Telephone 401861-2900 James L. Bell, PE Providence, R.I. 02903 Lewis J. Bain, PE Pasquale Codola,, PE Other Offices. Waltham, Howard E. Crooks, PE Wethersfield, Nashua David 1. Grist, AIA Associates Partners Richard H. Casale, AIA Fenton G. Keyes, PE PeterHuie,PE Henry E. Bilodeau, PE Len Kuhn,.ASID, 16D Keyes Associates -Architects/ Engineers/ Planners Walter 1. Keyes, PE Robert J. McCormick, PE Ernest E. Kirwan, AIA James R. Miller, PE Leonard N. Buckler, PE Richard J. Philips, PE Domenic Procaccini, PE March 28, 1977 Glenn C. Reeves, AIA "Our Twenty-SiXth Year" Consultant Raymond C. Murphy, PE Rhode Island Department of Economic Development One Weybosset Hill Providence, Rhode Island 02903 Attention: Mr. James 0. Roberson, Executive Director R.I. Port Authority and Economic Development Corporation Gentlemen: In accordance with our contract with the State of Rhode Island and as modified in the Rhode Island Department of Economic,'Development Project Analysis Worksheet, we are pleased to submit the following final report of the."Quonset Point Technical Park Facilities Plan." This report provides a comprehensive Land Use Study; investigation and inventory of all existing structures; compilation and study of all available soils information; a study and preliminary layout of proposed highway and .rail transportation systems; a study and preliminary- development schemes of the Port Facilities; a study of the existing airport; and construction cost estimate for the three final Land Use Scenarios as agreed upon by your staff. We are most appreciative of the opportunity to perform this service and wish to acknowledge the courtesy, cooperation, and assistance rendered to members of our firm by yourself, your staff-, members ' of the Task Force and The Rhode Island Port Authority and Economic Development Corporation Planning Committee in the preparation of this report. Very truly yours, KEYES ASSOCIATES KEYES ASSOCIATES Leonard N. Buckler Dale S. Plante KEY1 Partner Project Manager LNB/DSP:gd Key6s Associates INTRODUCTION The three Development Scenarios,included in;, this Report and their various land use options represent the culmination of the Facilities Study element of the Master Development Plan for Quonset Point Technical Park. Two additional elements of study for the Master Development Plan include; 1) an environmental assessment being prepared by the Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode1sland, and 2) a socio-economic assessment being prepared by Gladstone Associates. It is important to note that these scenarios represent the final product of two years of marketability studiesp and ten-months of Master Development Planning. Our Schedule.inc.luded eight meetings of the Master Development Plan, Task Force, five public meetings which were held at intervals of four to six weeks during the ten month study period, and numerous working sessions between Depart- ment of Economic Development personnel and the staffs of the three elements of study. In addition, on-site inspections of petroleum related facilities, modern technical/industrial parks and airport related industrial parks were conducted. Additional information was collected when, in September 1976, the Coastal Resources Management Council and the Department of Economic Development sponsored a three-day Conference on Rhode Island and Offshore Oil.. All of these examples of research and more have contributed to a rationale for development of Quonset Point/Davisville which es- sentially holds economic development and the creation of employ- ment opportunities as the primary goals for development. Nonetheless, the comprehensiveness of this effort serves to recognize all concerns. For,instance, prior to land development planning, all of the environmentally-sensitive areas were identi- fied, and to the extent possible, new development was planned around these sites. In addition, the golf course was held intact due to tremendous local interest in that facility. Wh'at is presented here are three basic Development Scenarios which we feel incorporate the most practical, sensible and functional uses for properties at the Quonset Point/Davisville Site. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal Introduction I' Development Scenarios Scope and Definitions Property Description 1-2 thru 1-6 Development Scenario 1 1-7 thru 1-13 Development Scenario 2 1-14 thru 1-17 Development Scenario 3 1-18 thru 1-20 II Building Inventory Categories Inventoried II-1 Summary of Building Cost Analysis 11-2 Quonset Point Building Inventory 11-3 thru II-10 Davisville Building Inventory II-11 thru 11-21 Quonset Point Building Areas,etc. 11-22 thru 11-28 Davisville Building Areas, etc. 11-29 thru 11-35 III Transportation Roadways III-1 thru 111-3 Airport Facility 111-4 thru 111-5 Railroad Facilities 111-6 Ocean Port Dev elopment 111-7 thru 111-8 IV Site Utilities Water Distribution System IV-1 thru IV-4 Sanitary Sewerage System IV-5 Steam and Gas Distribution- IV-6 Storm Drainage System IV-6 Electrical Distribution System IV-7 Communication System IV-7 Fire Alarm System IV-7 V Additional Studies Surfical Geology of'the Site V-1 Borings at Air National Guard V-2 thru V-4 Borings at Kiefer Park V-5 thru V-11 V1 Cost Estimates Summary VI-1 Development Scenario I- VI-2 Development Scenario II VI-3 Development Scenario III VI-4 Primary Access Corridor VI-5 Railr6ad Spurs VI-6 Ocean Port Development VI-7 Sanitary VI-8 Storm Drainage VI-9 VII Appendix Sheet Exisiting Land Use Plan 1 Building Inventory Plan 2 Primary Access Corridor 3 Airport Plan 4 Railroad Plan 5 Ocean Port Plan 6 Water Distribution System 7 Sanitary Sewerage 8 Storm Drainage System 9 Electrical Distribution System 10 Communications System 11 Fire Alarm System 12 Steam and Gas Distribution System 13 4f. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D (ByS 0 1 s qpmsn@ scoinamms I QUONSETPOINT TECHNICAL PARK FACILITIES STUDY A. Scope and Definitions As described in the Introduction, the proposed Facilities Plans for Quonset/Davisville are documented in Three Development Scenarios - based on the extent of off-shore oil and gas findings, hereinafter described@as "High Find", "Medium Find" and "No Find." Each Development Scenario includes several major land use invariants: The Airport, Air National Guard, General Dynamics, common service areas, the golf course and various environmen- tally-sensitive areas. These common land areas comprise 1636 acres of the total 3200 acre parcel, leaving 1564 acres po- tentially available for new development. For a detailed description of the above areas, refer to Property Descrip- tion, pages 1-2 thru 1-6. Scenario 1. "High Find" - Mixed Land Use. This scenario is based on a "high find" of commercially recoverable oil and gas as defined in the NERBC-RALI Report: 2.4 billion barrels of oil, 2.4 trillion cubic feet of asso- ciated gas and 10.1 trillion cubic feet of unassociated gas. Refer to a detailed description of Scenario 1 on pages 1-7 thru 1-13 Scenario 2. "Medium Find" - Mixed Land Use. This scenario is based on a "medium find" of gas and oil defined as: 900 million barrels of oil, 4.2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 3.3 trillion feet of unassociated gas, assumed to be commercially recoverable. Refer to detailed description on pages 1-14 thru 1-17. Scenario 3. "No Find" - Mixed Land Use. This scenario reflects the land uses which would be projected if either of the following should occur: a) A "low find" or "no find" of oil and gas in the off-shore explorations. b) An unfavorable Environmental Impact Statement with respect to the transfer of title to surplus property is filed. In this case, the land would be utilized completely for Industrial and Commercial development as defined in the Harbridge House Standard Industrial Classifications (SIC) List and for Recreational uses. Refer to detailed descrip- tion on pages 1-18 thru 1-20. I-1 B. Property Description .1. General Location - The Facilities Study Area at Quonset/ Davisville is comprised of 3200 acres of land owned en- tirely by the United States Navy, and is bounded on the east and south by Narragansett Bay and on the west and north by residential and wooded areas. 2. Infrastructure. The Development Scenarios, as presented in this Report were based on a careful study of all ex- istilng facilities at the Quonset/Davisville site, including: existing building condition, roadways, airport, rail and port capabilities, water, sanitary, drainage systemst electrical, fire alarm and communications system distribu- tion and geological conditions at the site. Refer to the Table of Contents for references to appropriate text and maps. 3. Land Use Categories. In our analysis for the potential reuse of the Quonset/Davisville properties, we have divided the total land area into five basic land use catetories. a) Presently Occupied Parcels b) Common Service Areas c) Environmentally Sensitive and Recreation Areas d) Navy Retained Land e) New Development Areas For a detailed breakdown of land areas, refer to Table A, Page 1-3. .4. Areas Unavailable for Development a) Presently occupied Parcels 1) The Quonset State Airport Complex This parcel, consisting of 650 acres, will become a public general aviation airport, owned and operated by the State under FAA licensure. Some of the airport facilities will serve the .State Air National Guard. In the event of a national emergency, the airport could revert to military control. Based on this probability and the value of an airport for shipment of industrial products, it was determined that the airport should remain. 1-2 TABLE A ategory Use Acre/Parcel Total Acres 4J Presently Quonset State Airport 650 Occupied Air National Guard 45 rO Parcels Military Housing 12 0) General Dynamics 150 > 857 Acres 14 0 44 Common Roadways and Interchange 89 a).Service Wastewater Treatment Facility 22 Areas 121 Acres Sensitive and Environmentally sensitive Recreational areas and buffers 282 Areas 18-hole Golf Course .166 Calf Pasture Point 210 658 Acres TOTAL AREA UNAVAILABLE.FOR D9VELOPM ENT 1636 Acres Navy Navy Permanent Mission and Retained future mobilization land .r4 Land (Refer to Existing Land Use Plan, Sheet #1) 732 Acres New Development Remaining land areas Areas within Quonset/Davisville 832 Acres 4J 4J TOTAL POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT 1564 Acres 0 TOTAL QUONSET/DAVISVILLE LAND AREA 3200 Acres 1-3 2) The Air National Guard (ANG) This parcel, consisting of 45 acres, is a vital link in the State's defense and training system and should remain intact. 3) General Dynamics Corp. General Dynamics, consisting of 150 acres, was not considered for possible reduction or elima- tion, because it employs 5,000 people, and is a vital part of the State's economic stability and economic recovery plan. 4) Military Housing This 12-acre parcel in West Davisville is occupied by military personnel for housing and will continue for that purpose. b) Common Service Areas 1) Roadways. A total of 121 acres has been utilized for the proposed interchange at the intersection of Route 1, Davisville Road and Roger Williams Way and for various auxiliary roadway requirements.. 2 Wastewater Treatment Facility. The 22-acre parcel adjacent to the Golf Course has been identified through an independent engineering study to be the optional location for this facility. It will not impede growth of any important component of this plan and with some concern for landscape treatment should be an attractive part of the new development. it's location has been approved by concerned groups in the Town of North Kingstown. c) Sensitive and Recreational Areas 1) Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Various areas throughout Quonset/Davisville have been identified by the Coastal Resources Center atthe University of Rhode Island as being en- vironmentally sensitive. These areas encompass sandy beaches, mud flats, salt marshes, and ponds. These sensitive areas not only harbor wildlife, but provide an interesting and welcomed relief from the toils of everyday life. Therefore, 150 acres has been earmarked-to remain untouched and are identified on the development. scenarios. 1-4 2) Recreational Area Golf Course. The 18-hole Golf Course consisting of 166 acres should remain in its present location for the following reasons: , (1) At a cost of $5 0,000 per hole the total cost of replacement of the 18 holes and support facilities would be in the vicinity Of $1,000,000. (2) Any development to the west would conflict with the location of the new wastewater treatment facility and the open recreational area traversed by Mill Creek. (3) Any elimination of golf holes in the vicinity of the "0" Club for potential industrial development is not economically warrantedr considering the cost of relocating each golf hole and the speculative nature of industrial expansion. 3) Calf Pasture Point. This parcel, consisting of 210'acres east of Allens Harbor, will be developed in the future by the Town of North Kingstown for recreational purposes. 5 Areas Potentially Available for Development a. Navy Permanent Mission The areas described as Navy Permanent Mission sites are generally not available for lease. However, this study takes the position that these areas offer a tremendous amount of development potential when in- corporated with the surrounding Surplus Areas. Specif ically these areas are: 1) 119 acres in the West Davisville area adjac ent to the main AMTRAK Rail System. The property is flat open land and encompass four large ware- houses .(808,000 Sq. Ft.) which are provided with rail sidings. This site is adjacent to the Surplus Area defined in the Development Scenarios as Area #9. 1-5 2) 235 acres south of the Administrative Triangle in Davisville defined in the Development Scenarios as Area #12. The area is flat, open land serviced by rail, and offers warehouses and large flat lay down areas. The site is north of the Surplus Area defined in the Development Scenarios as Area #13. 3) 85 acres southwest of the Davisville Pier Area and 75 acres north of the flight path area. The site is flat, open land serviced by rail and offers warehouse space and a bulkhead. The site is adjacent to the Davisville Pier Area defined as Planning Area #1. These parcels are within Surplus Areas defined in the Developnent Scenarios as Areas #5 and #7 respectively. b. Remaining land areas within Quonset/Davisville -available for Development are listed on the Scenario Plans (in Appendix VII) as follows: Areas #1, 2, 4 a 35-acre portion of Areas 5, 125 acre portion of Area 7, 90 acres of Area 9, 10, 13, 1.4, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 comprising a total of 832 acres. 1-6 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 1 "HIGH FIND" - MIXED LAND USE A. General Description This Scenario represents an optimal land use plan for Quonset/Davisville,'if the following conditions are met: 1. Off-shore explorations produce a "high find" of commercially recoverable oil.and gas. See Definitions on Page I-1. 2. The results of the Bureau of Land Management Environ- mental Impact Statement on off-shore drilling permits development as described in this Scenario, 3. The.plan receives all local, State and Federal approvals necessary to proceed with development. B. Land Area Categories In Scenario 1, the allotment of land areas by category is described in detail on Table A, Page 1-3 and in condensed form as follows: 1. All unavailable parcels 1636.acres 2. Navy-Retained Land Parcel 12 (not utiliz ed) 235 acres 3. New petroleum-related development parcels a. Primary uses 657 acres b. Secondary uses (Areas 13, 21? 22, 23) 125 acres 4. New commercial and industrial parcels 531 acres 5. New recreation parcels 16 acres This acreage description illustrates that the primary oil and gas-related land uses would be limited to 782 acres or approxi- mately 24% of the total 3200 acre site, for the following reasons: a. Not all land areas at Quonset/Davisville lend them- selves to petroleum-related use due to topography, access and relationship to waterfront. 1-7 b. Not all high find" support facilities as listed in the NERBC-RALI Report would locate on this site, because: a) adequate facilities exist elsewhere and, b) such facilities cannot be supported at Quonset in terms of utility demands, height restrictions (within the airport flightpath) and large land area require- ments (2500 acres). These support facilities include an oil refinery of 1000 acres, marine terminals of 100 acres, gas processing plants of 345 acres and related pipe lines and landfalls of 6 acres. The remaining land areas, 531 acres, would be developed for new commercial and industrial uses, some of which would be attractive to the oil and gas industry. For example, the hotel would be heavily utilized by petroleum-related activi- ties as would be office buildings in Area 18 of the Technical Park. C. Development Cost The total development cost for Scenario 1 is projected at $63,967,058. For a detailed breakdown of costs refer to Section VI of this report. D. Land Area/Land Use Description Area #1. This 100-acre site consists of Davisville Pier #2 and adjoining land to the north. At present both Pier #1 and Pier #2 and 70 acres of land are occupied by various petroleum related support companies. These temporary oil support companies have a one year lease agreement with a 30-day can- cellation clause, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Protection and Maintenance Agreement between the Navy and the Rhode Island PAEDC. Brown and Root, Inc., a cold steel fabrication company is presently negotiating for a right of first refusal to lease 100 acres of land at Davisville and Pier #2. It is noted that the halting of off-shore drilling until the B.L.M. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is completed and reviewed will have an impact on additional oil support activity at Quonset/Davisville. How this will effect the present tem- porary oil support bases is not known. We expect this EIS procedure will be at least 18 months in duration., Area #2. This 12-acre site in Allens Harbor, north of the EFold steel fabrication area, is earmarked as a ferry landing for the Bay Island Park, a marine recreational plan for the State of Rhode Island connecting various land and island areas in Narragansett Bay. 1-8 Also, based on information submitted by Gladstone Associates, economic consultants, there is a need for additional boat .slips in the State of Rhode Island. This information further indicates the need for at least 200 boat slips suggesting that marina expansion is economically viable. The time table for the marina expansion may vary anywhere from 2-4 years depending on the results of the EIS and the economic climate at that time. Area #3. The land west of Allens Harbor, consisting of approxi- mately 85 acres,was used as a training area by the Seabees. This land is presently reserved for Navy future mobilization requirements. A 7-acre parcel abutting Allens Harbor, now occupied by several storage buildings,could be utilized for a marina and boat stor- age as part of the overall development of Allens Ha'rbor. It is recommended that new facilities be constructed in this area as part of the overall marina development. The remaining land area of 78 acres could serve as an open storage area for oil support related supplies. It is noted that most of this 78 acres is not suitable for construction, i.e., one-tenth is wooded, one-fourth is a mud flat, and one- fourth is below the 100 year flood plain elevation of 13'-. mean sea level. since this land is still under Navy ownership, usage would be restricted to the provisions of a Navy lease. Therefore, it is recommended that the purchase of the 30 acre site bordering Davisville Road which is above the flood plain, and the 7 acre site recommended fora marina, be pursued by the State of Rhode Island. Area #4. This.land area-of approximately 30 acres, providing Fail-and vehicular access to Pier #1, may serve as a common corridor and pier area for a water transport facility. The implementation of this concept is essential to the flow of products shipped by water and offers an added valuable asset for any and all industrial growth of Quonset/Davisville. This concept must be implemented soon after the completion of favorable decision. the land transfer, and EIS, assuming a Prompt action will'be requited since, at present, Pier #1 is occupied by temporary oil-related support companies, and the commencement of off-shore oil exploration will result in the establishment of Permanent Service Bases. These Bases would prefer to remain on Pier #1; however, we believe this area should be free for use as a common corridor to achieve optimal use of the total pier facility. 1-9 Area #5. The land area, east of the airport near the Da vis- ville piers, consists of approximately 120 acres. Approxi- -mately 12 acres of the land is wooded. Six acres of that wooded land is within an 85-acre parcel presently retained for Navy Permanent Mission requirements. This 85-acre parcel is of prime importance in the development of Quonset/Davisville for usage by oil related support bases for the following reasons: 1) its closeness to water; 2) access to proposed bulkhead and pier development; 3) the rail system; and 4) two large dehumidified warehouses. This parcel, to repeat, is vital to the success of-Scenario 1, and every effort possible must be made to negotiate a lease with the Navy. The Permanent Services Bases that would occupy this 85-acre parcel require acgess and proximity to the piers. These bases will be-established at Quonset/Davisville after exploratory off-shore drilling is complete. Anticipating a 2 year period for an EIS and 2 years of exploratory drilling, these Bases would occupy Quonset/Davisville within a range of 4-9 years. Area #6. Based on a "high find", available information indi-. cates a need for 4000 linear feet of bulkhead and 4000 linear feet of pier space. Both road and rail service will be required. This development is described in Section III, Transportation, pages 7 and 8. Area #7. This land, north of the Airport Complex, consists of approximately 225 acres. Because of its close proximity to the Davisville Piers and because it is open land with some paved areas, it could serve the needs of additional Permanent Service Bases as well as for use as a pipe coating yard. Approximately 100 acres of this land are b'eing retained by the Navy and would therefore be available only under the provisions of a short term lease. Permanent pipe coating operations require 95 acres for pipe laydown and 5 acres for the pipe coating process plant. A portable plant may be constructed on 30 acres of leased land. Depending on the number of Permanent Service Bases that would occupy Quonset Point under t -his Scenario, some consideration should be given to a portable plant versus a permanent installa- tion. The pipe coating operations would take place prior to expansion and use of the remaining land area by a Permanent Service Base. I-10 Both these occupants would require a rail spur in order to make their operations viable for the needs of off-shore oil drilling. Therefore fa new rail spur through this area-has been indicated in this Development Scenario. Area #8. This parcel, consisting of approximately 120 acres, is n37wn as the Davisville administrative triangle. It has a small campus-like setting consisting of living, dining, administrative, and recreational facilities. With such fea- tures readily available, this area could serve as a research and administrative complex. This land may be used only on a temporary basis through a lease arrangement, since it is reserved for Navy future mobilization requirements_. Area #9. This parcel, west of Route 1, known as West Davis- ville, onsists of approximately 310 acres. A 42-acre parcel containing four large warehouses could serve as temporary storage facilities for the various commercial and industrial busines.ses which would locate at Quonset Point. A 65-acre parcel to the north of the warehouse site with its rail systems connecting directly with the AMTRAK Rail System, could serve as a central rail terminal and minibus@shuttle depot for transporting goods and people to Quonset/Davisville. These two land parcels are within a 107-acre site which is being retained for Navy Permanent Mission requirements. There- fore, use of this land may be only on a temporary lease arrangement. The 90-acre parcel east of the central rail termina 1 also with rail service could serve a single industrial use. Some con- sideration was given to the use of this area by.petroleum- support facilities. However, because most such support facili- ties require water locations and piers, this site was not given top priority. The 12-acre parcel indicated as occupied by military housing will remain a residential area. The remaining area of 101 acres is a red maple swamp and should remain undisturbed except for possible use as a primary access corridor to Quonset/Davisville. Area #10. This 49-acre parcel has good visibility from Route 1 and therefore is a prime site for commercial development. Area #11. This 21-acre parcel, with Mill Creek traversing the site,has been earmarked for open recreational use. It is recommended that Mill Creek be considered a sensitive area and remain undisturbed. I-11 Area #12. This 235-acre parcel containing numerous ware- houses and rail spurs on open, flat ground offices would make an excellent industrial site. However, with the exception of -possible temporary lease arrangements, this land is reserved for future Navy Permanent Mission requirements, and is not utilized in this Scenario. Area #13. This 75-acre parcel to the north of the golf course could serve secondary oil-related industries. Such industrial uses may require rail service, necessitating the extension of a rail spur through the Navy property to the north. These secondary petroleum-related industries would-not occupy this parcel until 4-9 years after exploratory drilling has commenced. However, the land, together with the buildings, could be occupied on a temporary basis in accordance with the provisions of the standard Navy lease. Because of possible impacts from industrial usage of this parcel on surrounding land areas, it is recommended that landscape buffers be pro- vided. Area #14. This 16-acre parcel adjacent to the golf course site is a natural location for a tennis club and court complex. Since the socio-economic assessment of recreational needs have projected a demand for these facilities, 8 indoor and 20 out- door tennis courts have been included in this plan. Area #15. This 9-acre parcel, presently a parking-area, is located at the entrance to Quonset Point. With the adjoining golf course and tennis courts, this site has been indicated as the location for a motor hotel complex since demand would be high for overnight-lodging, food and beverage facilities. Area #16. This 68-a cre parcel abutting the easterly border of the Shore Acres community, has good road and utilities access, and favorable topographic characteristics. For these reasons, a multi-use Technical Park has been located here, with buffer areas landscaped to minimize the contact with adjacent residential properties. Area #17 & #19. These two 7-acre parcels could func tion separately or be combined into one parcel for industrial use. In both instances, careful planning must be ensured to avoid impacts on the other uses in the immediate area. Area #18. This 66-acre parcel, because of its proximity to the golf course and frontage on the access road to the "0" Club and Davisville area, is projected for use as an office Park. Please note that Building #8 and part of Building #9 1-12 are scheduled to remain because of their structural soundness, architectural interest and potential for re-use. Building #8, Aformerly a Navy hospital) could serve as a Medical Office Building. Building #9, (formerly a Navy B.O.Q.), has an attractive stone entrance wall 'and flagstone terrace lined with large maple trees, and could serve, with some modifications, as an office building. Area #20.. This 16-acre parcel, south of the Port Authority Building #7 on Quonset Road, is earmarked for a single indus- trial use. Area #21. This 40-acre parcel, north of General Dynamics, could se@ve as a secondary oil-related industrial site. Some of the buildings in this area might provide temporary space .since the secondary oil related industries would not occupy this parcel until 4-9 years hence. Area #22 and #23. These 5-acre parcels at each end of General Dynamics are earmarked for secondary petroleum-related indus- tries. Please note that several of the areas designated for oil-related use may continue to be used on a temporary basis for lengthy periods by non-oil related industries. Area #24. The 8-acre parcel north of the General Dynamics storage area is an irregular shaped land parcel which could serve a single industry. Area #20 abutting this parcel to the west could be combined with this parcel to meetthe requirements of a potential developer. Area #25. This 14-acre land parcel adjoining the Quonset Carrier.Pier, could serve as a storage and shipping depot for the secondary petroleum-related industries. The primary oil support facilities are located at Davisville Pier #1 and adjoining areas, leavingthe Quonset Pierto serve a secondary function. Area #26. This 22-acre, irregularly shaped land parcel abut- ting General Dynamics is earmarked for their potential expansion. Sensitive Areas A total of 282 acres of "sensitive" land has been identified and should remain untouched. These land areas are sandy beaches, salt marshes, and other natural vegetative areas as defined by the Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island as part of their environmental assessment of Quonset/Davisville. These vegetative areas represent interest- ing areas that lend to overall development and are of no practical value. We have an obligation to save these areas which harbor the wildlife, and provide a natural amenity to the Technical Park. 1-13 CL AIV DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 2 "MEDIUM FIND" - MIXED LAND USE A. General Description This Scenario represents an optimal land use,plan fa Quonset/Davisville if the following conditions are met: l.-- Off-shore explorations produce a "medium find" of commercially recoverable gas and oil as stated in Definitions, Page 1. 2. The results of the B.L.M. Environmental Impact State- ment on off-shore drilling permit development as described in this Scenario. 3. The-plan receives all local, State and Federal approvals re quired for development. B. Land Area Categories. In Scenario 2, the allotment of land uses by category is described in detail on Table A, Page 1-3, and in condensed form as follows: 1. All unavailable parcels 1636 acres 2. Navy retained land Parcel 12 235 acres (not utilized) 3. New primary petroleum-related development parcels 523 acres 4. New commercial and industrial parcels 790 acres 5. New recreation parcels 16 acres. This acreage description illustrates that the primary oil and gas-related land uses would be limited to 523 acres,.or approximately 16% of the total 3200 acre sites. C. Differences Between.Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 1. In Scenario 2, the new bulkhead in Area #6 would be required (as in Scenario 1) but the finger piers would not be constructed. 2. The "Secondary oil-related" parcels in Scenario 1, (Areas #13, 21, 22 and 23) probably would not be required by the oil and gas companies, and would be available for standard industrial use, 1-14 3. The requirement by the oil and gas companies for office space in Area #18 would be diminished, as would potential demand for motel, food and beverage and other commercial functions. D. Development Costs The total development cost for Sce nario 2 is projected at $61,084,890. For a detailed breakdown of costs refer to Section VI, of this report. E. 'Land Area/Land Use Description Area #1. This 100-acre parcel consists of Davisville Pier #2 and the adjoining land to the north. At present, both Pier #1 and Pier #2 and the surrounding 70 acres of land are occupied by various oil related support companies. These tem- porary oil support companies are presently occupying space under the Protection and Maintenance Agreement with the Navy. Brown and Root, Inc., a cold steel fabrication company, is presently negotiating for a right of first refusal to lease 100 acres of land at Davisville together with Pier #2. However, the "find" resulting from the exploratory off-shore oil drill- ing operations will determine whether or not this cold steel fabrication company will locate at Davisville. Assuming a low to medium find, this 100 acre site may be occupied by Permanent Service Bases. Please note that the delay of off-shore drilling pending the completion of a B.L.M. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) @will vary the time schedule. We estimate that the EIS will take 2 years to complete and evaluate. Assuming a favorable ruling, we estimate that an additional 3 years will pass before the influx of the Permanent Service Bases take place. Area #2. This 12-acre site in Allens Harbor is earmarked for marine recreational use as described in Scenario 1. Area #3. This 85-acre parcel west of Allens Harbor could serve the same purpose as described in Scenario 1. Area #4. This 30-acre parcel could serve as a common corridor for the flow of products to Pier #1 as described.in Scenario 1. Area #5. This 120-acre parcel east of the airport.and near the N-avisville Piers could serve as oil related support bases for reasons described in Scenario 1. Area #6. Based on a "medium find", available information indicat d a need for 4000 linear feet of bulkhead. Also, both rail and vehicular service will be required. This concept is reflected in Section III Transportation, Pages 7-8. 1-15 Area V. This 225-acre parcel north of the Airport could serve oil-related purposes as described in Scenario 1. Area #8. This 120-acre parcel known as the Davisville Adminis- U'rative Triangle could serve as'a research and administrative Complex as described in Scenario 1. Area #9. This 310-acre parcel west of Route 1, known as West Davisville, could serve the same purposes as described in Scenario 1. Area #10 This 49-acre parcel at the intersection of Route 1 and Davisville Road could serve for commercial development as mentioned in Scenario 1. Area #11. This 21-acre parcel is earmarked for open recrea- t'i"S'=a -Use as described in Scenario 1. Area #12. This 235-acre parcel could serve an industrial func with restrictions described in Scenario 1. Area #13. This 75-acre parcel to the north of the golf course could serve.as an industrial site. With the possible need for rail service to this parcel, a rail spur would have to be extended through the Navy retained land to the north. Because of the possible visual conflicts of this parcel.with surround- ing land use, it is recommended that landscape buffers be provided. Area #14. This 16-acre parcel could serve for a tennis com- plex as described in Scenario 1. Area #15. This 9-acre parcel could serve as an office, retail or hotel complex, as described in Scenario.l. Area #16. This 68-acre p arcel could serve as a multi-use techR-ir-cal park for reasons described in Scenario 1. Area #17 and #19. These two 7-acre parcels could serve as industrial sites as described in Scenario 1. Area #18. This 66-acre parcel could serve as an office and mediFa-l-park as described in Scenario 1. Area #-20. This 16-'a'cre parcel could serve an industrial use as mentioned in Scenario 1. Area #21. This 40-acre parcel north of General Dynamics could Fe-rve a single industrial use. The present buildings could serve a temporary purpose until demand forthis parcel is generated. 1-16 Areas #22 and #23. These 5-acre parcels at each end of General Dynamics are earmarked for industrial use. In addition, these parcels may serve as parking areas for General Dynamics, or be held in a temporary status for other industrial uses. Area #24. This 8-acre parcel could serve a single industry as descrIibed in Scenario 1. Area #25. This 14-acre parcel, together with the Quonset Pier, ma@ serve the fishing industry. one should consider the attraction of birds to fishing boats and its adverse affect on the airplane navigation within the adjacent airport approach zone. The Quonset Pier facilities, with its rail service, can func- tion as a water transport facility to service the entire Quonset Complex as well. Area #26. This 22-acre parcel is earmarked for potential expansion as described in Scenario 1. Sensitive Areas A total of 282 acres of land have been identified and should remain untouched for reasons.described in Scenario 1. 1-17 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 3 "NO FIND" - MIXED LAND USE A. General Description. This Scenario results from an investi- gation of the potential for land use at Quonset/Davisville should there be a "low find" or "no find" of off-shore oil and gas or if oil-related facilities for any other reason should not be located on this site. B. Land Areas. In Scenario 3, the allotment of land uses by Category as described in detail on Table A, page 1-3 and in condensed form as follows: (1) All unavailable parcels 1636 acres (2) Navy-retained land (not utilized) 235 acres (3) New commercial and industrial parcels 1313 acres (4) New recreation parcels 16 acres The acreage description illustrates that new uses comprise 1329 acres or approximately 41% of the total 3200 acres within the Study Area. C. The fundamental differences between Scenario 3 and Scenario 1 and 2 are as follows: 1. There would be no requirement for bulkheading channel excavation, piers, or other special work in Area #6. D. Development Costs. The total development cost for Scenarid is projected TF $45,616,371. For a detailed breakdown of costs refer to Section VI of this report. E. Land Area/Land Use Description Area #1. This 100-acre parcel consists of Davisville Pier #2 and djoining land to the north. At present, both Pier #1 and Pier #2, and the surrounding 70 acres of land are occupied by various oil related support companies under one year lease agreements with a 30-day cancellable clause. In this scenario, no commercial finds of petroleum are as- sumed to occur on George's Bank. Thus the Temporary Oil Service Bases at Davisville would vacate. Such a likelihood could conceivably occur within 5-7 years pending.B.L.M. Environmental Impact Statement submission and ruling and the results of oil exploratory drilling. In this event, this parcel could serve a single industry which requires rail service and water frontage for shipping purposes are necessary. 1-18 Area #2. This 12-acre site in Allens Harbor is earmarked for marine recreational use as described in Scenario 1. .Area #3. This 85-acre parcel west of Allens Harbor could serve the same purpose as described in Scenario 1 except that the open storage area wouid not be used by oil-related support companies. Area #4. This 30-acre parcel could serve as a common corFl'-d-o-r for the flow of products to Pier #1 as described in Scenario 1. Area #5. This 120-acre parcel is designated for indus trial use. Approximately 85 acres of this 120-acre site are Navy owned. This 85 acre parcel is of prime importance in the development of Quonset/Davisville for water-borne shipping. This parcel contains an elaborate rail system together with two large dehumidified warehouses. It is not likely that this 85 acre parcel will be released by the Navy without a signifi:cant re-use of the property, however, a temporary lease agreement should be pursued, if industry is interested in the parcel. Area #6. The development of this area for additional piers or bulkhead is not recommended since most of the assigned industrial areas are basically speculative, Area V. This 225-acre parcel north of the airport complex has been designated for industrial use and open storage. Approximately 100 acres of this land are being retained by the Navy and would be available on a short term lease arrage- ment. It is noted that landscape buffers are recommended on Davisville Road fronting this land parcel. Area #8. This 120-acre parcel could serve as a research and @i'dministrative complex as described in Scenario 1. Area #9. This 310-acre parcel, known as West Davisville, couTd serve the same purposes as described in Scenario 1. Area #10. This 49-acre parcel at the intersection of Route 1 and Davisville Road could serve for commercial development as mentioned in Scenario 1. Area #11. This 21-acre parcel is earmarked for open recrea- tional use as described in Scenario 1. Area #12. This 235-acre parcel could serve an industrial use with restructions described in Scenario 1. 1-19 Area #13 This 75-acre parcel to the north of the golf course could serve as an industrial site. With the possible need for rail service to the parcels, a rail spur would have to be extended through the Navy retained land to the north. To accomplish this, a railroad 'construction service agreement will be necessary. However, due to the speculative nature of this site and the costs of a rail spur, new track construction should be delayed until more favorable conditions become ap- parent. Because of the possible visual conflicts of this pacel with surrounding land use, it is recommended that landscape buffers be provided. Area #14. This 16-acre parcel could serve for a tennis complex as described in Scenario 1. Area #15. This 9-acre parcel could serve as an office, retail or hotel complex as described in Scenario 1. Area #16. This 68-acre parcel could serve as a multi-use .technical park for reasons described in Scenario 1. Area #17 and #1 9. These two 7-acre parcels could serve as industrial sites as described in Scenario 1. Area #18. This 66-acre parcel could serve as an office and medical 'park as described in Scenario 1. Area #20. This 16-acre parcel could serve an indus trial use as mentioned in Scenario 1. Area #21. This 40-acre parcel could serve a single industrial use as described in Scenario 2. Area #22 and #23. These 5-acre parcels are earmarked for industrial use as described in Scenario 2. Area #24. This 8-acre parcel could serve a single industry as described in Scenario 1. Area #25. This 14-acre parcel and Quonset pier could serve the fishing industry with some reservations as described in Scenario 2. Area #26.. This 22*acre parcel is earmarked for potential expansion as described in Scenario 1. Sensitive Areas. A total of 282 acres of land have been identified and should remain untouched for reasons described in Scenario 1. 1-20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I no BuHad Ong) @RWSMOTW @ @ I I Building Inventory of Quonset Dav isville, Rhode Island Categories Inventoried: 1. Administration, offices 2. Hospital, Dispensary 3. Dining Facilities, Food Handling Storage 4. Barracks 5. Housing, Quarters 6. Recreation Facilities 7.@ Miscellaneous 8. Navy Exchange, Commissaries 9. Classrooms, Instruct. Buildings, Small Shops 10. Sewage Disposal 11. Heating, Power Plants 12. Warehouses, Storage, P.W. Garages, Magazines 13. Piers 13A Water Supply 14. Electric Boat Bldgs. (Not Inventoried as to condition) 15. Airport Buildings 16. National Guard Bldgs. Categories not Inventoried Trans. Vaults, Fuel Tanks, Buildings Under $10,000 Replace Value (Total Approximately $200,000 @ Quonset & $700,000 @ Davisville. + $1,000,000--) Cate_gory_Condition G Good, F Fair, P Poor Summary of Building Cost Analysis Quonset Category SF ACQ. Rep.- 1 - 13 3,340,000 $ 35,000,000 $ 138,OOOoOOO 14. EB 2,000,000 23,000,000 104,000,000 15. Airport 144,000 2,000,000 51300,000 16. R.I.A.N.G. 312,000 3,700,000 15,600,000 1 - 16 5,796,000 $63,700,000 $262,900,000 Davisville Replacement Category SF Acquisition Cost cost 1 13: 4,400,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 124,000, POO 11-2 Building Inventory -_Quonset Point Cate2ory Present Potential Proposed Use Use Demolition 1. Admin. Bldg_. Condition 07 G R.I.P.A. R.D.N.Res. x Sedo Inc., CD Prep. Agcy. 421 P x 438 P x 523 F x 437 P x 620 F Custy Lobster Inc. x 2. Hospital Dispensary (Brick) F Brick Portion Wood Portion #8 (Wood) P x 508 F x 3. Dining, Food Hand. & Storacre Murphy Caterers #15 F Quonset Pt.Credit x Union #55 F x 4173 F x 14 F x 4. Barracks 56 F-P x 41-48 F-P x 49-54 F-P x 11-3 Building Inventory Quonset Point Present Potential Category use Use rhimolition 4. Barracks Bldg. Condition 432 P x 433 P x 491 P x 518 F-P x 522 F Offices 9 F 490 P x 503 P x 504 P x 5. Housing Quarters (Ci cle A-T) F-P x CPO F-P x Kiefer Park P x Hoskins Park P x Military Dr. P x Navy Dr. P x Area #1 F x Area #2 F x Dogpatch F-P x DMOQ5 F R.C.Diocese of Prov. x DfdO 9 9 x D250 F x 11-4 Building Inventory Quonset Point Present Potential Category Use Use Demolition -6. Recreation Bldg. Condition 12 G 11011 Club Same Custy Lobster Inc.& 62 F Dept. of Natural Res. x 435 P x 436 P x 502 P x 505 P x 506 P x 875 P Bath House Same 876 r 877 Pool Filter 922 r C.P.O. Club 923 P x DS- 34 P x DS- 69 G Golf Course Club House Same #759 & Assoc. Bldgs. P x DS- 45 P x S- 89 G Diocese of Prov. x 7. Miscellaneous #157 F-P Chapel 65 F-P Laundry 407 G Fire Station Same 410 F-P Incinerator 11-5, Building Inventory Quonset Point Present Potential lemolition Category use use 7. Miscellaneous Bldg. Condition DE-7 P Laundry 395 P Macis Automotive x Service School F Town o f N.Kingstown x 829,830,831 P Preston Elec.Inc. x 8. Navy Exchange Commissaries #934, G x DHa-3 G (new) Storehouse P (o 1d) x 9. classrooms Instr. & Shops #413 x 458 F Painting Service Co. x 459 Custy Lobster Inc. x 507 F Quonset Metal Finishing Co. x 694 F Fit 'N Stich x 10. sewage Disp. #66A-66M F Sewage Treat. Plant. x DS - 55 F Sewage Pump Station x TT-9. Building Inventory_- Quonset Point Present otential Category Use Use LDemolition 11. Heating Power Plants Bldg. Condition #64 r Central Heat.Plant x 195-198 P x 63 F-P x 12. Warehouses Storage Garages,Magazines #13 F Maintenance Shops x 19 F Ocean State Testing Co. x 20 r Becker & Goldstein, x Inc. 59 F x 98 r x 100 r x 102 r x 104 x 143 F State Fire Marshall x 144 F-P x 145 F x 412 F x 414 F x 415 r R.I. Ship Supply x 416 r x 11-7 Building Inventory Quonset Point Present Potenti C tegory Use Use Demolition a 12. Warehouses, Storage Garages,14agazines Bldg._ Condition 418 F Becker & Goldstein,Inc. x 419 F x 423 P x 410 F Preston B lectronics,Inc. x 424 P x 425-430 P x 431 P 451 F x 460 F x 462 F x 516. P x 517 P x 518 P x 533-535 F x 621 P x 630 F Kingston Pipe x 58 P x 380 P x 384 F Narragansett Elec.Co. x 393 P x 394 P X, Rhode Island ocean 880 G State Training Facility Same 11-8 Building Inventory Quonset Point- Present- Potential Category Use Use IDemolition 12. (Con't.) Bldg. Condition DEll F Sheilco Ltd. x DE 12 F Harter Underwater x Corp. DEE-1 P x DEE-5 G Warehouse DFJJ, F x DFG-3 F x DS-24 P x DS-33 P X, DS-45 P x D-180 F Eastman Whipstock x D-1 84 F x 487 F x 13. Pier Area mobil Oil Co. x Various Bldgs on Pier Custy Lobster Inc. x Dept.Nat. Resources x 13A Water Supply #909 Water Meter Pit x 466 Under. Reservoir x 57 Pump House x 485 x 851 Valve House x 11-9 Building Inventory Quonset Point Use U e -T Present Potential Category s Demolition 13A Water Supply (Cont'd) Bldg.__ Condition D75 Pump Station x D75-5 Under.Reservoir x D75-6 Under.Reservoir x D304 Water Storage Tank x II-10 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential category Use Use IDemolition 1. Administration Bldg. Condition #101 F offices A-78 F x A-129 F Offices A-130 F A-133 F x S6 F x S8 F x S32 F x W5 F x W319 F x 404 G N.C.B.C. Hdqts. Same 395 F x 397 F x 3. Dining,Food Hand. & Storage C100 G Dining Hall 212 F x 4. Barricks Clol G Housing-Quarters C-102 G 11 C-103 G It C-104 G C-105 G Building Inventory Davisville Category Present Potential 7- Use ---Use IDemolition -4. Barracks (Cont'd) Bldg. Condition C-106 G Housing -Qtrs. C-107 G C-108 G C-109 G 391 G 392 G 5. Housing D264-D272 F x 6. Recreation #108 P x 236 P x 237 P x AH-2A P x C-114 G Recreation C-115 G Gymnasium E-112 G Small Boat' Berths S-89 G R.C.Diocese of Prov. x 379 G Theater 380 G Library 11-12 BUi ldin _g-Inventory Davisville Present Potential Catqgo. Use Use [Demolition 7. Miscellaneous Bldg. Condition #341 F Chapel S-16 G Fire Sta. 8. Navy Exchange #102 F 9. Classrooms,Instr. Bldg. Shops #27 P x 31 F 32 F 44 F x 47 F x 48 F 56 F x x 58 P x 59 P 60 P x 62 F 63 F 69 P x 106 P Pistol Range ill G & Armory 113 F 11-13 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential category Use Use Demolition 9. Classrooms,Instr. ' Bldg.Shops (Cont'd) Bldg. Condition 118 G x 175 F x 213 F x 277 F x 279 F x 280 F x F x 312 G Storage 324 F x 330 F x 332 P x 343 P x 344 P x 345 P x 365 F (No Access) x 368 F x 370 F x Schlumberger 371 F Service's x 372 F' x 374 P x A-10CT G Battery Shop A-11 F x 11-14 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential Category Use T Use Demolition 9. (Con't. Bldg. Condition- A-12 F x A-63 P x A-64 P x A-66 P x A-132 P x AH-30 F Sheilco x AH-4A F x B-11 F x C-116 G Classrooms C-117 F x C-118 F x C-120 F x C-121 x C-122 F x C- 123 F x C-124 F x C-125 F k C-126 F x C-130 F x C-131 F x D-11 F x D-12 F x E-107 F (No Access) x 11-15 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential Category Use Use Demolition 9. Classrooms Instr. Bldg. Shops (Con't.) Bldg. Condition S-9 F x S-10 F x S-11 F x S-17 F x S-20 F x S-21 F x S-22 x S-23 F x S-40 x S-41 G Maintenance Shop S-42 F x S-82 P x S-83 P x S-84 P x S-85 G x S-101 F S-102 F x S-103 F x S-104 F Baroid Division,N.L. x S-105 F Industries x S-106 F x S-107 F Mc Junkin Corp. x 11-16 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential Category Use Use Demolition 9. (Con't.) ldg. Condition S-108 F Milchem Inc. x S-109 F x S-110 F x S-111 F x AS 14@1. S-112 F x S-113 F x S-114 F 6: ZF IS 4t--'@' x 4V-k S-115 F x S-116 F x S-117 F x S-118 F x S-119 F x S-120 F x T-2 F x T-3 F x T-4 F x T-5 F T-6 F x T-7 F x T-8 F x T-9 F x T-10 F x T-11 F x 11-17 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential Category I Use Use IDemolition 9. (Con't.) Bldg. Condition T-13 F x T-15 F x T-16 F x T-17 F x T-18 F x T-19 F x 378 F x 390 F x 399 F x 408 F 68 F x Heating 11. Power Plants #103 G Heating Plant 210 F x 225 G Heating Plant Heating Plant C-113 G S-18A F x S-29A F x T-lA F x W-3A F x W-5A F x 11-18 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential Category Use use Demolition 12. Warehouses,Stor. Garages, Magaz. Bldq. Condition #18 G Warehouse #34 G It #35 G It #36 G Warehouse 37 G 38 G 39 G 40 G 41 G 42 G 43 F x 45 F x 46 F x 64 G Warehouse 67 F X, 218 F x 224 G x 314 G Warehouse 315 G 316 G 317 G 318 G 11-19 Building Inventory Davisville Present Potential C-ategory Use Use FDemolition 12. (Con't.) Bldg. Condition #363 G x AB-3 F x C-132 F x CO-3 F x E-319 G Warehouse C-119 F x S-12 F x S-18 F x S-19 F x -S-19A p x S -26 G x T-1 F x W-1 x W-2 F x W-3 F x w-4 F x W-6 G Warehouse W-7 G 410 F x C-126 F x E-111 F x AH-30 F Sheilco Ltd. x A136,Al3,70AHSB F Imco services x 11, 20 Building Inventory Davisville Present ipotentia2 Category Use Demolition 12. (Con't-) Bldg. Condition 27,69,210,212 x 213 F imco Services A91,32,175,AH5A F Oilfield Products Group x AH2A,AH2B,AH2E F x 13. Piers Barold Division,N.C. #1 G Industries,Inc. Same Drilling Fluids Div. G Milchen,Inc. G Shell Oil CO. G B.J.'Hughes,Inc. #2 G imco services Division Halliburton Corp. oilfield Products Group Dresser Industribs Houston Oil and Minerals Corp Mobil Oil Co. Exxon Co. 11-21 BUILDING INVENTORY QUOiiSET TOTALS Category S.F.. Acq- Replace. 1. 77,046 $ 714,768 3,346,000 2. 93,573 1,240,171 6,322,000 3. 123,370 1,941,416 9,476,000 4. 598,574 4t883,845 26,878,000 5 1,218,595 7t877t668 18,565,000 6: 162,153 lt954,875 7,769,000 7. 29,316 432,861 2,003,000 8. 59,600 778,018 1,352,400 9. 27,241 256,437 822,000 10. 16,107 314,253 lf049,000 11. 40,660 6,307,331 30,846,000 12. 795,639 6,623,389 22,218,000 13. 93,760 1,562,224 7tO94,000 3,335,634 $34,887,256 $137,740,400 14. 1,940,604 $22,586,200 $103,967,000 15. 143,726 $ 1,939,266 $ 5,223,000 16. 311,667 .$ 3,648,828 $ 15,556,000 11-22 BUILDING INVENTORY QUONSET POINT In Category S.F. Acq. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 1. Administration #7 42,550 $511,445 $2,501,000 x 421 1,040 2,000 10,000 x 438 22,000 126,000 575,000 x 523 640 2,500 11,000 x 437 7,700 35,,000 180,000 x 620 3,116 37,823 69,000 x 77,046 $714,768 $3,346,000 2. Hospital Dispensary Brick Wood #8 91,350 $1,184,149 $6,092,000 x x 508 2,223 56,022 230,000 X, 93,573 $1,240,171 $6,322,000 3. Dining Facilities, Food Handling & Storage #15 14,060 $ 269,040 $1,316,000 x #55 71,071 1,284,421 6,285,000 x #173 3,254 20,279 76,000 x #14 34,985 367,676 1,799,000 x 123,370 $1,941,416 $9,476,000 4. Barracks #56 3,786 $ 58,948 288,000 x #41 to #48 160,656 1,3091660- 8,908,000 X] #49 to #54 984,295 4,817,000 x #432 17,611 140,408 640,000 x #433 17,511 140,702 641,000 x #491 13,300 90,000 367,000 x #518 13,737 74,182 318,000 #522 56,600 266,000 1,089,000 x 159,281 1,592,647 8,882,000 x #490 11,400 65,000 265,000 x #503 11,600 67,500 276,000 x #504 12,600 94,503 387,000 x 598,574 $4,883,845 $26,878,000 11-23 BUILDING INVENTORY - QUONSET POINT In Category S.F. Acq. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 5. Housing, Quarters (circle) A-T 69,599 $ 202,710 $ l,'075,000 x (C.P.O.) 21-40 30,493 122,051 648,000 x Kiefer Park (202-370)=168 201,375 755,193 4,084,000 Hoskins Park 414,162 1,287,663 2,762,000 x Military Dr. 196,800 1,834,000 2,940,000 x Navy Drive 106,278 987,794 11591,000 x Area #1 79,698 1,705,719 2,324,000 x Area #2 450,960 976,230 1,331,,000 x Dog Patch -74,230 331,069 1,810,000 x 1,218,595 $7f877,668 $18,,565,000 6. Recreation Facilities #11 #12 24,100 $ 484,000 $2F366,000 x #62 5,895 161,784 792,000 x #759 x & Assoc. Bldgs. x #435 12,896 120,952 454, 000 x #436 19,594 450,375 1,950,000 x #502 11,400 66,000 270,000 #505 12,600 67,495 277,000 x #506 29,568 172,269 705,000 x #875 900 90000 16,000 x #876 10,000 10 000 17,000 x #877 1,200 23,000 39,000 x #922 8,000 243,500 321,000 x #923 13,000 26,000 36,000 x DS-34 4,000. 30,500 138,000 x DS-69 9,000 90,000 388,000 x 162,153 $1,954,875 $7,769,000 7. Miscellaneous #157 Chapel 7,400 $ 71,000 $ 290,000 x #65 Laundry 7,381 .196,506 962,000 x #407 Fire Sta. 8,859 83,198 378,000 x x #410 Incin. 2,076 47,157 214,000 x DE-7 Laundry 3,600 35,000 159,000 29,316 $432,861 $2,003,000 11-24 BUILDING INVENTORY QUONSET POINT In Category S.F. Acq. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 8. Navy Exchange, Commissaries #395 2,800 20,018 - 87,000 X #934 1,800 47,000 56,400 x DHJ-3 55,000 711,000 1,209,000 x new oYd 59,600 $778f018 $1,352f4OO 9. Classrooms, Instructional Bldgs., S mall Shops #412 4,284 $ 16,904 $ 77,000 x #453 1,250 6,600. 38,000 x #458 7,930 68,900 298,000 X #459 6,230 90,801 166,000 x #507 5,622 29,423 120,000 x #510 830 16,000 74,000 x #694 lf095 27,809 49,,000 x 27,241 $256,437 $822,0001. 10. Sewage Disposal #66A-66M 14,219 $293,653 $1,006,000 X DS-55 lf888 20,600 43,000 x 16,107 $314f253 $1,049,000 11. Heating - Power Plants #64 35,655 $6,247,078 $30,567,000 x #195-#198 1,536 12,000 60,000 #63 -2,715 39,253 178,000 X 40,660 $6,307,331 $30,846,000 12. Warehouses, Storage, Garages, Magazines #13 18,700 $221,000 $1fl69f000 X #19 1,930 41,304 202,000 X #20 9,525 126f977 621,000 x #59 23,573 190,927 867,000 x #98 5,151 76,187 346fOOO x #100 3,074 l8f408 90,000 x #102 1,300 15,187 69,000 x #104 10,250 152,300 692,000 x #143 1,377 15,884 69,000 x #144 1,377 15,884 69,000 X #145 6,171 47,126 214,000 x #412 10,833 64,459 264fOOO x #414 12,600 73,355 317,000 x #415 2f412 $ 13f801 $ 63,000 X 11-25 BUILDING INVENtORY,j- OUONSEt POINT' @Acq. In Category S.F. Replace. Use Usable Demo. #416 5p252 $ 48,456 $ 220,000 x #418 10,900 18,074 82jOOO x #419 10,,250 20,248 88POOO x #423 3,000 11,000 58,000 x #424 3,000 11,000 58,-000 x #425-430 104,832 731,301 3,330jOOO x #431 5,234 61,121 278,000 x #451 9,312 48,925 225,000 x #46-0 @1,540 10POOO 43,000 x #462 4,284 19,463 x #516 12,600 47,015 193pOOO x #517 12F600 76,270 313,000 x #518 13,737 74,182 318,000 x #533-535 12,000 56,743 121,000 x x #621 1,200 4,000 17,000 #630 18,062 576,493 1,014,000 x # 58 .7,036, 75,789 371,000 x #380 1,900 10,200 50,000 x #384 4,000 27,000 132,000 x #393 1,612 27f256 118,000 x #394 1,062 41100 18,000 x #880 71,493 11872,799 .3,064,000 x DE-11&12 8,,200 26,000 116,000 x DEE-1 22,000 33,000 153,000 x DEE-5 175pOOO 850,000 3,676,000 x DF-11 4,100 13,000 58,000 x DFG-3 30rOOO 128,000 551,000 x DS-24 41,000 94,000 426,000 x DS-33 20,000 63,500 288,000 x DS-45 50,000 263 000 1,077,000 x D-180 14,400 162:000 434,000 x D-184 3,200 15,000 68,000 x #921 3,465 43,846 58,000 x #487 1,095 27,809 49,000 x 795,639 $6,623,389 $22,218,000 13. Pier #495 93,760 $1,562,224 $7,094lOOO x 11-26 BUILDING INVENTORY - QUONSET POINT 14, Electric Boat Buildings at Quonset COSTS BUILDING TOTAL AREA ACQ. REPLACE. 1 106,330 Square Feet 965,300 $ 41723,000 2 111,560 1,063,700 51542,000 10 14,000 135,100 661,000 16 242,030 2,009,400 9,832,000 17 51,972 it to 668,900 31273,000 60 622,726 it it 11,553,100 57,680,000 149 N/A 151 3,272 30,000 113,000 152 20,984 it to 11,,300 43j-000 166 N/A - 374 65,500 it 11 197,200 965,000 375 59,000 to if 209.600 1,025,000 406 111,300 11 11 1,194,500 5,424,000 409 7.34 If if 31700 17,000 420 19,796 or 266,700 11154,000 464 4,,264 it 63,100 308,000 480 2,153 11 40,300 165,000 483 500,000 11 187,700 918,000 484 50,197 11 180,800 885,000 488 50,895 it It 645,700 2,428,000 536 101,000 It 813,400 1,667,000 537 170,835 If 1,396,300 2,759,000 108 1,052 If of 22,700 85,000 879 13,163 it If 88,800 152,000 897. 211460 It No - 60,000 DG-12 4,127 it it 58,700 266t000 DT-38 4,127 to 11 71200 29,000 DT-39 4,12-7 it of 31,400 57,000 DT-41 i5,900 65,000 628 1,800 it If 12,900 24,000 697 2,200 11 of 5,000 22,000 698 1,000 it 2,500 11,000 932 24,300 427,000 21350,000 924 8,000 37,500 52,000 18 19,500 of 147,400 721,000 373 14,200 of of 93,400 491,000 1,940,604 $22,586,200. $103,967,000. 11-27 BUILDING INVENTORY - QUONSET POINT In Category S.F. Acq. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 15. Airport #3 63,750 $ 660,392 $3,231,000 x #61 28,100 543,000 - #132 225 2,524 13,000 #165 360 3,600 14,000 #455 700 36,000 179,000 #456 730 36,000 179,000 #457 25,669 153,892 666,000 #481 830 14,000 66,000 #509 5,600 16,000 74,000 #360 640 2,500 11,000 #711 3,350 29,310 53,000 #818 708 38,548 68,000 #822 700 37,300 69,000 #823 180 12,700 24fOOO #884 6,900 230,000 376,000 #885 4,900 112,000 182,000 #890 364 11,500 18,000 x 143,726 $1,939,266 $5,223,000 16. National Guard #4 63,750 $ 677,912 $3,317,000 x #5 63,750 676,930 3,312,000 #6 63,750 657,545 3F217,000 #11 76,080 1,061,079 3,414,000 #97 3,111 50,000 245,000 #99 lf377 18?408 90,000 #101 1,300 15,000 73,000 #103 10,300 158,000 772,000 #105 200 4,800 24,000 #129 225 2,524 13,000 #130 225 2,524 13,000 #131 225 2,524 13,000 #139 192 6,022 29,000 #140 192 6,022 29,000 #141 1,400 23,100 113,000 #142 1,400 17,000 76,000 #155 21,670 201,555 758,000 #618 960 4,832 9,000 #619 960 7,460 15,000 #626 600 12,391 24,000 x 311,667 $3,648,828 $15,556,000 11-28 BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILLE TOTALS Category S.F. Acq. Replace. 1. 224,878 $2, 467,396 $@10,614,000 2. 3. 28,890 829,380 21,275,000 4. 259,538 4,702,629 11,272,000 5. 162,000 90,000 459,000 6. 104,361 1,714,345 41466,000 7. 9,218 167,650, 691,000 8. 18,630 199,186 1,186,000 9. 469,650 2,659,777 91739,000 10. - - 11. 15,982 615,870 2,557,000 12. 2,097,401 10,608,821 44,837,000 13. 4,500 L.F. (Berth) 980,000 7,910,347 35,899,000 4,370,548 $31,965,411 $123,995,000 11-29 BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILL E In Category S.F. Acq. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 10 Administration, Offices #101 163,857 $1,344,040 $8?0011000 x A-78 1,,800 3,500 21,000 x A-129 2,900 5,000 30,000 x A-130 2,900 5,000 30,000 x A-133 2,900. 5,000 30,000 S-6 31,100 33,300 198,000 x s-8 4,700 49,000 292,000 x S-32 4,,600 58,424 348,000 x W-5 7t100 46,400 262,000 x W-319 1,200 40,000 110,000 x #404 18,021 713,732 11020,000 x #395 7,800 108,600 180,000 x #397 4,000 55,400 92,000 X 224,878 $2,467,396 $10, 614,000 3. Dining Facilities, Food Handling & Storage #C100 24,072 $805,745 $2,134,000 x #212 4,818 23,635 141,000 x 28,890 $829,380 $2,275,000 4. Barracks 0-101 21,,702 $ 402,809 $ 1,075?000 x C-102 21,702 1,075,000 x C-103 21,702 405,732 11075,000 x C-104 21,702 405,009 1,075,000 x C-105 21,702. 405,809 1,075,000 x C-106 21,,702 413,310 1,095,000 x C-107 21,702 360,531 955,000 x C-108 21,702 351,992 932,000 x C-109 21,702 351,589 931,000 x #391 32,110 598,163 992,000 x #392 -32,110 598,163 992,000 x 259,538 $4,702,639 $11,272,000 5. Housing, Quarters D264-D272 x 9 Buildings @ 18,000 10,000 51,000 x 162,000 $90,000 $459,000 11-30 BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILLE In Category S.F. Acq- Replace. Use Usable Demo. 6. Recreation #108 10,453 $ 59,566 $ 319,000 x #236 924 5,792 15,000 X' #237 2F863 13,500 72,000 x AH-2A 6,328 28,951 155,000 x C-114 30,000 450,277 11193,000 x C-115 31,314 498,164 1,320fOOO X E-112 - 56,294 153,000 x S-89 6,758 48,301 259,000 X #379 9,,298 336,063 595,000 x #380 6,423 217,437 385,000 X 104,361 $1,7141345 $4,466,000 7. Miscellaneous #341 Chapel 2,418 $ 79,310 x S-16 Fire Sta. 61800 88,340 526,000 x 91218 $1671650 $691,000 8. Navy Exchange #102 18,630 $199,186 $1,186,000 X 9. Classrooms, Instruction Bldg., Small Shops #27 5,712 $51,,775 $308,000 X #31 4,200 22,000 125,000 x #32 4,720 13,850 78,,000 x #44 5,587 27,356 155,000 X #47 5,587 25,381 144,000 X #48 5,587 25,808 146,000 x #56 1,000 5,857 31,000 x #58 1,000 11,000 63,000 x #59 1,000 10,000 60,000 x #60 1,000 10,000 60,000 X #62 1,000 10,000 61,000 x #63 4,100 12,000 64,000 X #69 4,000 16,456 ..88,000 x #106 1,734 12,936 77,000 x #111 8,870 42,550 233,000 #113 1,000 2,500 15,000 X #118 7,888 39,789 237,000 X #175 1,668 5,134 29,000 x #213 1,456 $ 3,975 $ 26,000 x 11-31. BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILLE In Category S.F. Acq-_ Replace. Use Usable Demo. 9. Classrooms, Instruction Bldg., Small Shops (continued) #277 51600 $ l7fOOO $ 83,000 x #279 6,520 43,063 231,000 x #280 4,000 13,463 72,000 x #295 1,000 5FOOO 27,000 x #312 8,,000 20,665 57,rOOO x #324 3j200 28,531 54jOOO x #330 11000 6,900 190,000 x #332 1,000 4,900 24,000 x #343 1,810 34,049 83,000 x #344 lf447 23j,126 57?000 x #345 820 19,030 46,000 #365 4,000 32,000 61,000 x #368 4,331 22,052 42,000 x #370 81000 101,617 187,000 x #371 8,372 97,534 179,000 x #372 5,100 44,720 82,000 x #374 11000 5,760 111000 x A-10CT 470 2,481 15,000 A-11 41000 13,000 76,000 x A-12 4,000 13,000 76,000 x A-63 1,000 3,500 21,000 x A-64 1,000 3,500 21,000 X. A-66 280 3,000 16,000 x A-132 Soo 2,,273 1,400 x AH-30 1,400 3,193 17,000 x AH-4A 7,483 7fO14 38,000 x B-11 4,000 13,000 76,000 x C-116 21,698 430,260 1,140?000 C-117 8,580 65,245 173,000 x C-118 8,367 50,488 137,000 x C-120 4,483 25,057, 66,000 x C-121 5,166 19,166 52,000 x C-122 4,403 23,941 65,000 x C-123 4f938 35,056 93,000 x C-124 4,280 24,615 65,000 x C-'-125 4,000 26,257 69,000 x C-130 4,000 51,752 140,000 x C-131 4,000 22,000 58,000 x D-11 4,000 12,700 76,000 x D-12 4,000 13,000 76,000 x E-107 7,581 57j,400 152,000 x S-9 4,000 12,696 76,000 x S-10 4,000 12,696 76,000 x S-11 5,600 13,000 77,000 x S-17 3,097 78,684 479,000 X. S-20 4,000 $ 13,000 $ 76,000 x 11-32. BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILLE In Category S.F. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 9. Classrooms, Instruction Bldg., Small Shops (Continued) S-21 41000 $13,000 $76tOOO x S-22 41000 13,000 76,000 x S-23 4,000 13,000 76,000 x S-40 41495 24,,715 147,000 x 111 S-41 4,000 40,449 103,000 x S-42 4,000 12,696 76,000 x S-82 4,000 6,348 34,000 x -S-83 41000 6pOOO 34,000 x S-84 4,000 6,400 34,000 x S-85 4,120 7,745 41,000 x S-101 4,000 42,000 x S-102 4,000 10,468 29,000 x S-103 41000 9,000 25,000 x S-104 4,000 11,520 32FOOO x S-105 4,000 9,655 27,000 x 4,000 9,655 27j,000 x S-107 4,000 9,120 25,000 x S-108 4fOOO 9@1120 25,000 x S-109 41000 9,000 26,000 x S-110 4,000 9,000 25,000 @x S-111 4.,,000 91120 25,000 x s-112 41000 90120 25,000 x S-113 4,000 9,679 27fOOO x S-114 4,000 9,655 27,000 x S-115 4,000 .9,,679 27,000 x S-116 4,000 9,679 27,000 x S-117 4,000 9,100 25,000 x s-118 4,000 9,120 25,000 x S-119 4FOOO 9,389 27,000 X. S-120 4,000 9,000 25,000 x T-2 4,000 12,700 76,000 x T-3 4,000 12,700 76,,000 x T-4 4,000 16,700 100,000 x T-5 4,000 12,700 76,000 x T-6 4,000 13,000 76,000 x T-7 4,000 13,000 76,000 x T-8 41000 13,000 76,000 x T-9 4,000 13,000 76,000 x T-10 4,000 12,696 76,000 x T-11 4,000 12,696 76,000 x T-13 4,000 12,696 76,000 x T-15 4,300 12,696 76,000 x T-16 4,000 12,700 76,000 x T-17 4,000 12,696 76,000 x T-18 4,000 $13,000 $78,000 11-33. BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILLE In Category S.F. asa_- Replace, Use Usable Demo. 9. Classrooms, Instruction Bldg., Small Shops (Continued) T-19 41000 $ 12,700 $ 76,000 x #378 1,700 71,177 126,000 x #390 4,400 43,000 66,000 x #399 2,000 46,538 72,000 x #408 4,000 15,000 19,000 x #68 6,000 26,700 143,000 x 469,650 $2,659,777 $9,739,,000 11. Heating, Power Plants #103 1,848 $ 96,546 $ 588,000 x #210 420 15,000 91,000 x #225 2AP584 72,000 395,000 x C-113 6,792 325,524 862,000 x S-18A 1,200 29,200 169,000 x S-29A 1,500 47,400 2750000 x T-lA 768 16,@200 940,000 x W-3A 600 9,000 53,000 x W-5A 270 5,000 30,,000 x 15,982 $615,870 $2,557,000 12. Warehouses, Storage, P.W. Garages, Magazines #18 51,100 $170,500 .$1,015,000 x #34 53,500 228,000 1,389,000 x #35 51,500 227,200 1,383,000 x #36 50,700. 237,100 1,444,000 x 437 51,000 217,000 1,321,000 x #38 50,700 213,900 1,303,000 x #39 50,700 223,900 1,363,000 x #40 50,000 146,848 874,000 x #41 34,400 145,300 865,000 x #42 60,000 224,600 1,367,000 x #43 13,386 95,092 538,000 x #45 11,015 38,384 217,000 x #46 10,517 37,262 222,000 x #64 22,000 55,000 295,000 x #67 12,700 63,400 340,000 x #218 10,492 100,278 597,000 x #224 102,000 828,428 4,802,000 x #314 202,000 718,000 1,973,000 x #315 202,000 718,000 1,973,000 X. #316 202,000 718,000 1,973,000 x #317 202,000 $718,000 $1,973,000 x 11-34 BUILDING INVENTORY DAVISVILLE In CategoKZ S.F. Acq. Replace. Use Usable Demo. 12. Warehouses, Storage,, P.W. Garages'p Magazines (continued) #318 83,000 $1,207,000 $3,316,000 x #363 111900 69,392 131,000 x AB-3 31,000 127,417 .721,000 x C-132 22,000 38,,000 99,000 CD-3 30,400 127,300 720,000 x E-319 83,000 lp012,000 21386,000 x C-119 11,364 69,602 189,000 x S-12 13,000 126,630 754,000 x S-18 13,900 346,600 2,110,000 x S-19 20,200 41,300 246,000 x S-19A 20,200 41,300 246,000 x S-26 20,000 354,910 2,113,000 x T-1 22,000 93,000 555,000 x W-1 20f2OO 41,300 246-?000 x w-2 20,200 43,000 255,000 x w-3 20,200 64,775 386,000 x w-4 52,000 65,000 387,000 x W-6 37,600 149,900 869,000 x w-7 36,100 154,600 896,000 x #410 821 83,054 381,000 x C-126 13,920 77,230 204,000 x E-111 200,686 151,319 400,000 x 2,097,401 $10,608,821 $44,837,000 13. Piers #1 (Berth) 2f650 L.F.$4,671,022 $28,442,000 x x 33 IT 330 S.Y. #2 (Berth) 1,850 L.F. 3,239,325 7,457,000 x x 75,560 S.Y. 980,000 S.F.$7 9 10 3 47 $35,899,000 11-35 I I I I I %A'All, I @@% 1 0 1 0@ 46F@ I I I I I I I I I @ @ @ I I TRANSPORTATION ROADWAYS Existing Roadway Access Presently, access to the proposed development of Quonset Point- Davisville is through the Davisville-Devills Foot Roads which- run east to west and from Post Road (U.S. Route #1) running north and south. These roads are respectively a two lane highway which traverses a residential area and a four lane highway through a heavily developed commercial area. Traffic counts in'this area indicate that approximately 51% of the traffic utilize Davisville and Devil's Foot Roads, 33% from Post Road north and 16% from Post Road south. These roadways are servicing traffic volumes beyond their capac- ities, resulting in excessive back-ups and restricted movement of vehicles not only on the main arteries but on the surrounding. roadways as well. Such force flow and delays cause great driver discomfort and inconvenience. Within the Quonset Point-Davisville area the existing tenants have also expressed concern with regard to the vehicular traffic delays experienced with access and egress to the complex. Existing Trip origins The 1976 trip origins to the Quonset Point-Davisville area are based on actual traffic counts made by the R.I.D.O.T. Planning Division. The existing facilities located in the proposed development area, comprising approximately 11% of the development area, pro- duce a seven day, two way, average daily traffic of 15,100 vehi- cles. Of greater concern to us is the workday aVerage daily traffic which, through analysis of the D.O.T. counts, amounts to approximately 18,400 vehicles. Assuming a 50% split"into and out of the area, the one way average daily traffic is 9,200 of the traffic occurs at the morning and evening peak hours. This amounts to 1840 vehicles per design hour competing for the available road space during the critical peak hour periods of ingress and egress. These are the vehicles presently experiencing the aformentioned bottlenecks and delays. Develop6d and Projected TriL Origins The total developable area of the Quonset-Davisville area is approximately 1,300 acres. Of this area approximately 250 acres are presently occupied, 150 acres by General Dynamics, Electric Boat Division and 100 acres by temporary oil related service companies. As the area is further developed the Quonset Point Airport will also become a trip generator into the Quonset Pt. Technical Park. Trip generation, to a great degree,, is based on the anticipated land use of the area. For the purpose of this trip generation analysis a general appraoch will be used based on occupied areas compared to the total anticipated developable area. The total occupied area of 250 acres generates 9,200 work day trip origins. Electric Boat estimates they alone generate approximately 4,000 of these trip origins. The total 250 acres occupied, applied to the 9,200 work day trip origins, yield a trip generation factor of 36.8 trip origin per acre. The trip gen- eration factor for the Electric Boat area, of 150 acres applied to 4,000 trip origins, yields 28.6 trip origins per acre. These trip generation factors are quite high for technical park, there-. fore, it is assumed that the remaining acreage@will generate trips at one-half the average of these two generating factors or 16.5 trip origins per remaining gross acreage. The remaining 1,050 acres of developable area will then gener- ate 20,625 trip origins per work day. The existing 9,,200 trip origins plus the projected 20,625 trip origins yield a projected daily one way traffic volume of 29,825 for 30,000 trip origins, one way, to the proposed Quonset-Davisville complex by the year 19960 The present peak hour traffi c volume, 20% of the existing one- way A.D.T. work day volume, is based primarily on one major gen- erator. As more and varied generators locate within the complex with staggered work hours this peak hour factor could drop to approximately 14%. Thus the projected 1996 one way A.D.T. would yield 4,200 vehicles per peak hour competing for the available roadway space or an increase of 128% over the existing peak hour t,raffic. No additional growth factors are applied to these volumes be- cause of the very real possibility that commuter services in the form of rail and/or bus mass transit systems will be afforded the@complex. The rail commuter service between Providence and Quonset-Davisville could be implemented with the,proposed high speed northeast corridor rail service, now being studied, and can be scheduled between the high speed service. With the before mentioned traffic problems associated with the existing traffic on the existing roadways coupled with the projected traffic volumes it is apparent that an improved major access be developed. 111-2 The desirability of sites at the proposed technical park, to a great extent, will depend on adequate primary access to the area for motor vehicles. Proposed Primary Access Corridor The need for a primary access route to the Quonset Point-Davisville area from a major highway of the state roadway network is apparent. The anticipated traffic volumes could not be accommodated on the local or primary route systems of the.adjacent area without causing a complete breakdown of traffic on these systems. Route 41 with its connection to Interstate 95 to the north and the proposed connection to Route 138 and Interstate 95 to the south, is considered the best location on the state highway system for the primary access road to connect. The location of the primary route connection at Route 4 falls be- tween the Frenchtown Road and Route 2 interchanges. A general corridor is shown, as a shaded area, on a plan entitled "Primary Access Corridor". Within this corridor several alternates were reviewed. The primary access route may take the form of an arte rial along the widened existing Davisville and Devil's Foot Roads, a free- way concept entirely on new location or a combination of these. Along with the proposed primary access the existing at grade in- @ersection access to the Quonset-Davisville complex should be improved and maintained to serve much of the Post Road traffic. This access point would also serve as a relief valve should the primary access road experience delays. Much more in-depth study, along with an environmental impact statement, would be required before a preferred roadway align- ment can be determined. 111-3 TRANSPORTATION AIRPORT FACILITY General Description Quonset State Airport borders along the easterly limits of the proposed Quonset Point Technical Park. By virtue of its location, the airport affords a major attraction for industry. Business is relying increasingly on air transportation because f the advantages it offers in speed, and flexibility of opera- tions. In essence, the proposed technical park may well be 0 identified as an airport industrial park designed to integrate air transportation into the industrial operations and offering maximum use of air transportation in the movement of personnel and products. Quonset State Airport is classified as a General Aviation Airport performing under daylight operations. By definition, general aviation flying encompasses all civil flying except that by.-air carriers. Relative to general aviation, bus iness .flying represents the use of aircraft as a transportation vehicle.. Company-owned aircraft are used to transport executives, sales personnel, technicians and components from plant to plant and to customer locations, thereby saving time and enabling greater coverage of marketing areas. Land uses to be permitted will be influenced by.the height limitations for structures required for the safe operation of aircraft in the approach zone of runways and in the general vicinity of the airport. For a General Aviation Airport, the navigable airspace or the imaginary surfaces which are the control parameters for structure height limitations are defined in "Part 77 - Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace" of the Federal Aviation Regulations and are shown on Transportation Plan 4. These regulations tend to encourage horizontal or lateral structures rather than vertical development of structures, thereby creating an aesthetically pleasing low profile industrial development. These regula- tions are a useful guide in the establishing of specific zoning ordinances. Physical Plan of Airport The airport property occupies approximately 650 acres con- taining four (4) runways with supporting taxiways and aircraft parking areas. The' airfield besides operating as.a general aviation airport will also be used jointly by the Air National Guard. Runway 16-34, the main runway, is 200 feet wide by 8,000 feet long oriented northwesterly. Runway 5-23 is 150 feet wide and 4000 feet long oriented northeastely. These are the only runways which will be operative at present. Runway 1-19 oriented due north is 150 feet wide by 4000 feet long and will be temporarily inoperative. 111-4 Runway 10-28 will be rendered inactive and will be utilized as a taxiway and helicopter parking area. With the expected growth of military operations and the future growth of air transport resulting from the development of the technical park, runway 16-34 will become a precision instrument runway while runway 5-23 will remain a general aviation runway. Activation of runway 1-19 will likely occur during this growth period. 111-5 TRANSPORTATION RAILROAD FACILITIES Availability of Service According to the Final S stem Plan of the United States Railway Association (U.S.R.A.), rail service will be pro- vided to the rail yard at West D&visville. From this location all rail distribution will be provided by Seaview Railroad Co., Inc. to the Quonset Point Technical Park. Quonset/Davisville Rail System 1. Capabilities of Rail Feeder Lines The existing rail system and all feeder lines are licensed by the Navy to the State of Rhode Island Port Authority which in turn leases the rail system to Seaview Railroad Co., Inc. Any transporting of goods on this rail system will be accomplished by Seaview Railroad through separate contracts with present and future businesses located at Quonset/Davisville. Seaview Railroad intends to expand its services as required to meet the needs of the anticipated growth of the Quonset Point Technical Park. 2. Condition of Rail Feeder Lines The condition of the present track system is good and is considered to be a Class 1 and 2 under Federal Railroad Administration Track.Safety_Standards. Funding for necessary improvements to the rail system is sponsored by the Department of Commerce (Title 10) and New England Regional Council. Grants in the amount of $45,000.00 for 1976 and $30,000.00 for 1977. This funding encompasses only labor costs for rehabilitating existing trackage. 3. Recommended Improvements/Extensions of Rail System At the present time three rail systems are recommended to service different areas depending on the scenario. However, according to Seaview Railroad Co., Inc. lease agreement, the total footage of track cannot be reduced. Also, any and all improvements or new tracks will be performed by SeavieW Railroad Co., Inc. under force account work. 111-6 TRANSPORTATION OCEAN PORT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PIER/WHARF CONDITIONS The following design data is based on information from Construction Drawings provided by the Port Authority. A. Quonset Carrier Pier #495 1. Concrete on piers is 3000 lbs. per square inch 2. Live load on piers is 4,00 lbs. per square foot 3. Allowable Stresses Concrete - 1000 lbs. per square inch Steel - 20,000 lbs. per square inch 4. Impact: 15% of wheel loads on beams 10% of wheel loads on girders B. Davisville Marginal Wharf 1. The rigid pavement (concrete) live load is 1000 lbs. per square foot 2. The flexible pavement (asphalt) live load is 600 lbs. per square foot C. Davisville Pier #1 - 1. Live load is 600 lbs. per square foot at 40 foot width each side of pier 2. Live load is 500 lbs. per square foot at 170 foot center section of pier. D. Davisville Pier #2 1. The rigid pavement (concrete) live load is 1000 lbs. per square foot 2. The flexible pavement (asphalt) live load is 600 lbs. per square foot. CHANNEL DEPTHS/RAIL FACILITIES A. The Channel depths to the Quonset/Davisville piers and wharf are approximately 30 feet depending on silting which has taken place. B. In the vicinity of the Quonset Pier there exists a turn around basin of approximately 12 million square feet. C. Unloading facilities are available and are adequate for the present needs. D. Rail facilities are available to all the piers/wharf and are in good condition. ADJACENT SHORE DEVELOPMENT A. Quonset Carrier Pier T-his pier adjoins the present sewerage facility on one side and'land occupied by Electric Boat on the other. 111-7 B. Davisville Piers/Whar -TS-e-land on each side of these piers are considered 1.1sensitive" areas in terms of wildlife and wetlands and at present, with the exception of the possible development of additional bulkhead facilities, this land will not be disturbed. IV. SUPPORTING LAND FACILITIES The land area adjacent to the piers are suitably supplied with rail and storage facilities (some of which consist of 120,000 square feet). It is also noted that a major portion of the land area is paved. V. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The development of additional bulkhead and piers at Davisville is reflected on two scenarios plans and the rationale for the extent of,development is described in the scenario texts. 111-8 I I I I I I I I 1 4 * 4.4, 14,@ 1 !k" 4 A, @ I . '9@ I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 r-I 0 1 a u @ a U Mas N I SITE UTILITIES WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The existing water supply for Quonset Point/DoLvisville consists of a series of gravel packed wells with a total delivery capacity of 4.75 M.G.D. (million gallons daily). The water distribution system consisting of several miles of piping is particularly well gridded and has ample size supporting transmission mains. Storage for this system is provided with an approximate balance of underground and elevated water storage totaling 4.65 M.G. Most of the well-pumping stations and underground reservoirs contain auxiliary power that can maintain the system in operation for extended power failures. Records and reports of Quonset Pt/Davisville indicate that when in-full operation in 19,71, the average daily water consumption was 3.22 M.G.D.; maximum daily usage for the Quonset Pt. Technical Park would be approximately two times this amount, or 6.44 M.G.D. Of particular interest at the present time is the future water consumption when Quonset Pt. has changed to a commercial, industrial, and recreational related use. To do this on a preliminary basis, several assumptions were made.- Also, analysis oflexisting metered facilities were reviewed and used as a guide for future water use where no other data was available. Water usage for industrial areas was computed on the basis of 2,000 gallons per acre per day, office related areas.were determined on the basis of 1000 gallons per acre per day. Storage areas and the new piers at Davisville were allotted water usage on the basis of the best estimate or in the case of the new piers, estimates were obtained from NERBC-RALI report for oil company support facilities. At General Dynamics and the golf course whose water usage has been reasonably established, actual metered quantities were used for the purposes of this report. The following table lists each of the proposed industrial areas of development and other activities that will remain unchanged. IV-1 TABLE 1 FUTURE WATER USAGE Area Acres Activi@y. Average Water Use Based on 2000 Gal/ Acre/Day except As Noted 1 60 120,000 2 40 80,000 3 90 180,000 4 120 240,000- 5 235 470,000 6 Storage 100,000* 7 213 Golf Course 500,000** 8 68 68,000*** 9 68 136,000 10 176 352,000 11 General Dynamics 1001000** 12 40 80,000 13 85 170,000 14 100 200,000 15 New Piers @ Davisville 300,000* 1295 3,096,000 M.G.D. Estimated Because of Indeterminate Function Based on Metered Usage Based on 1000 Gallorls/Day/Acre Numbered areas were designated for use in determining water computations Note: The total 3,096,000 M.G.D. represents the projected average daily flow requirement. IV-2 Based on the total average daily flow from Table 1 of 3,096,000 M.G.D., maximum daily usage would"'Ie"'Ew-ice this amount or 6,198,000 M.G.D. Fire flow requirements could vary considerably depending on the particular activity or industry that will plan to locate at Quonset Pt. Fire protection for Quonset/Davisville is in most instances provided by well spaced hydrants connecting to properly sized water transmission and distribution piping. The requirements for fire fighting water supply vary a great deal throughout the service area. They may vary from 750 gallons per minute in the present residential areas to 5,000 G.P.M. or 6,000 G.P.M. at more hazardous locations such as the new pier and bulkhead area. In general, however, it is anticipited that fire protection of about 3,000 G.P.M. would be adequate to control most fires for a duration of 3 to'4 hours. The present criteria for fire flow requires, that under maximum daily flow conditions, a fire flow of (say) 3,000 G.P.M. v@ill not deplete the distribution storage by more than one third. This would work in the following manner: Input to the system from'wells is approximately 2,975� G.P.M. Output from the system during maximum day would be 4,200� G.P.M. plus a fire flow of 3,000� G.P.M. Input minus output equals the delpletion rate, or in this case, 4,225� G.P.M. The total depletion of distribution storage during a 3-hour fire would be about 760,000 gallons. The existing distribution storage is 4.65 M.G. One-third of this quantity is 1.55 M.G. Therefore, the depletion of storage experienced during a fire requiring a flow of 3,000 G.P.M. would only be about one-sixth of the quantity available. The foregoing information has been provided as an example of the overall system capability. The requirements of each potential industry at the multitude of available locations within the site will require individual analysis. This type of computerized hydraulic analysis is beyond the'scope of this report and since specific industrial data is not available, the results would be subject to inaccuracy because of the lack of the data. With this in mind some broad general statements can be made about the water supply distribution and storage system. Each of these three segments of the water system, although somewhat separate in nature, are totally interrelated. The water supply system, although high in ir on and manganese, IV-3 does not constitute a health hazard and is adequate to serve the foreseeable demands placed upon the system by industrial development at Quonset Point. The water distribution system is a well reinforced system with the exception of some minor side streets and dead ends. Water mains have been sized large enough to handle large demands and fires, and in most instancesi water mains have been looped to provide greater support. Individual industry requirements will in some instances outstrip the distribution system's capability to furnish water; however, minor water main extensions should be able to correct most water distribution problems. .Water storage for Quonset Point is provided with underground and above-ground storage totaling 4.65 M.G. This storage is considered to be adequate for the future growth of Quonset as an industrial development. It should be pointed out that fire protection for high hazard areas such as the new pier areas, or areas that might store fuel oil, may require quantities of water that cannot be supplied by the distribution system. In situations such as this the use of a salt water pumping for fire protection may be contemplated. This should be evaluated at the time the need for such high fire flow arises. IV-4 SITE UTILITIES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM The area designated for the pro@osed wastewater treatment plant is bordered by Roger Williams Way on the west, 2nd Street on the south, Lincoln Street on the north and Richmond Street on the east. All sewage flows collected at manhole located at,the intersection of 2nd Street and Roger Williams Way (see Sheet No.8) will be diverted to the proposed treatment plant by gravity. All other sewage flowing to the existing wastewater treatment plant will be pumped by the proposed pumping station. The plan consists of extending the existing 14 inch force main to the proposed wastewater treatment plant and making use of the existing force main. The proposed sanitary facilities to service the Davisville Road area from Roger Williams Way to the pier areas consists of a pumping station, force main and interceptor sewer along Davisville Road. The capacity of the pumping station and interceptor will also accommodate sanitary pumping facilities from ships docking at the piers. EXISTING SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM The existing sewerage system in Quonset consists of gravity sewers, pumping stations, force mains and primary .treatment plant. Sewers located in the Administration Triangle on the east.side of Davisville Road and the area encompassed by Camp Avenue, "B" street, Davisville Road and Roger Williams Way flow by gravity to'the main pumping station. The sewage is then pumped through a 14" force main directly to the treatment plant. A small lift station is also located in this area. The personal support area and the Kiefer Park area sewers flow by gravity to the treatment plant. This area also includes two pumping stations. The West Davisville and the Davisville pier areas are served by separate systems consisting of septic tanks and leaching fields. IV-5 SITE UTILITIES STEAM AND GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTE*@,p%@-\' Steam The existing steam plant will continue to service the needs of General Dynamics and other present occupants at Quonset/ Davisville. It is noted that this plant is very inefficient and should be abandoned. It is recommended that all future development at Quonset/Davisville be serviced by individual heating systems divorced of the present steam plant. Gas The existing gas system is small and limited to servicing the Davisville area. Gas did service the now abandoned Kiefer Park. Providence Gas Company has assured us that they can provide the quantity of gas needed for future development. However, no gas lines will be extended to service new development unless the demands of the new development is such as to be economically beneficial to the Providence Gas Company. Therefore, it is anticipated that the only.costs for steam and gas will be that required to serve the individual land parcels. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM A comprehensive storm drainage system presently encompasses the entire project area and is shown on sheet No. 9. In the proposed development of the various areas, it is expected that the existing facilities be utilized to the fullest extent possible. it is noted, however, that in some areas there are broken and blocked piping and structures. Depending upon the specific land use requirements and the geometric concept of each area to be developed, it is apparent that the removal and/or abandonment of the system may be necessary. In accordance with the dictates of topography and.grading at each site, re-routing of existing discharge lines in addition to new installations to adequately accommodate the surface water runoff will be necessarry. IV-6 SITE UTILITIES ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Quonset Point/Davisville area is'presently served by the Narragansett Electric Company. Two distribution systems are installed. one owned by the Rhode Island Port Authority (Navy) and the other by Narragansett Electric Company. It is Narragansett Electric Company's intention to purchase the state owned distribution system which receives its source from Narragansett Electric Company. The area is served by multiple 115 KV transmission 'lines. Distribution on the former Air station is 34.5 KV with a limited 12.470 and 4.160 KV overhead and underground network. @arragansett Electric Company states at this time there is ample electric power available from the 115 KV and 34 KV system. Ten miles to the north, at the Drum Rock Substation, 345KV is also available. Narragansett Electric Company plans are to furnish any size load required. Depending on its size, an extension of the 34.5 KV will be made, or an extension of the 115 KV with a 115 KV/34.5 KV substation to be constructed at Quonset/Davisville near the required loads. Narragansett Electric Company indicates only normal.service charges would be made for standard installations. All costs for service to Quonset/Davisville will be borne by Narragansett .Electric Company. 'COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM Communication systems serving the present occupants at Quonset/Davisville are good. New England Telephone Company will provide additional service to future development when the demand arises FIRE ALA RM SYSTEM The existing fire alarm system is adequate to serve the present occupants. However, a more modern fire alarm system is . necessary to serve the needs of future development. It is our understanding that the State of Rhode Island is presently considering a new fire alarm system. Therefore, assuming they will implement this new system prior to this site development, the cost of this system has not been included in this contract. IV-T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Add,ut,oflM Mud'uss v I I ADDITIONAL STUDIES SURFICIAL GEOLOGY OF THE SITE The material generally encountered throughout the site consists @of the gray-brown poorly graded sands, the gravelly sands with little or no fines and the silty sands and sand-silt mixtures. Frequently, these soils are interspersed with the fine grained inorganic silts and inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity. Ledge outcropping is evident at the knolls west of Fry's Pond. More detailed soils exploration data is available from borings taken in the Kiefer Park area. Six borings were taken. The material encountered was a brown-gray fine to coarse sand interspersed with fine and..fine to medium.gravel and traces Of silt. Most of the upper layers are dry or moist, dense to medium dense with blow counts ranging from 15 to 40. The upper two (2) foot layer of soil consists of a dry, loose topsoil and fill material. Very dense material was encountered at those borings indicating refusal. Water levels were recorded at depths from five (5) to nina (9) feet below ground surface. Within the Air National Guard property which lies west of the airport, two borings were taken. The material encountered was a brown, brown-gray fine- to coarse sand overlaying a 3' -6" to 5' -6" layer of dark brown fibrous peat. Below this peat, the material was a gray-brown fine to coarse sand with silt traces. Blow counts for the material above the peat ranged from 6 to 16 indicative of a loose to medium dense soil. Below the peat layer, blow counts ranged from 17 to 46 indicating a medium dense to dense soil. Water levels were recorded at depths of four (4) and nine (9) feet below ground surface. Based upon the blow counts indicated above the soils encountered are adequate to sustain the anticipated loadings of an indust- rial development. Where peat and other low load bearing soils are evident, special foundation design concepts are to be considered. V-1 BORINGS TAKEN AT AIR NATIONAL GUARD SITE V-2 AMERWAN PILE ORIVING EQUIPMENT CORPORATION SKEET-- 1 -0 F 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R 1. DAYE - - Fenton G. Keyes & Assoc. Providence, R.I HOLENO.-- TO JADDRESS PROJECTNAME Proposed Maintenance Sho LOCATION . Quonset_Point, R.I. LINE 6 STA. REPORT SENT TO- above PROJ. NO, OFFSET SAMPLES SENT.TO OUR JOB NO. 72-553 SURE. ELXV. GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR. 202 A Rods-IIAWII START 2/23/77 At- after 1/4 Hours Type H/S S/S -r- - - COMPLETE 2 23777 Sizel.D. Auger i-3/81, TOTAL MRS. f4 -0# BORING FOIREMAI P - cla- All. of ter Hours Hammer Wt. BIT INSPECTOR - ob 13 1 b I I n Hommer Fall 3011 1 SOILS ENIGR LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type slows per FM-65 ture Strata SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLC Blows Depths of on Sampler Density Remarks include color, gradation, Type of Change soiletc. Rock- color, typo I, condition, hard- per From- To Sample From Tq or foot 0-61r-6--12 12-18.@cLn is?. Elev. ness, Drilling time, seams and etc. No. PinlR*c.. 01-11611 D 29 1 27 30 Wet If Frost & Loam - Brown very fine SAND, some silt, dense trace of fine gravel - Fill 51 51-61611 D 7 8 8 Wet Brown Gray fine to coarse 2 181,1011 Imedium SAND, little Silt.& fine dense gravel - Fill 91611 4 Moist Dark Brown fibrous PEAT, 3 18 '15' medium trace of fine sand stiff 15' 7"5-161611 D 15 12 15 W t Gray Brown f ine SAND, --4 18,141 medium some silt dense 181 Moist I medium Brown fine to medium SAND, 201-21'611 D 6 6 little Silt (running.) 5 itsi. /-I dense 221511 ST t5rown yme 11- 22 11-23 11"' -D t 15 17 2 We n's e 23111". cjraveI7 it7te 51 I Bottom of Boring 2311111 R2 GROUND SURFACE TO USED H/S/A "CASING: THEN S/S to Z3 11 Sample Type Proportions Used 1401b Wt. x 30" tall on 2"O.D. SoftWer SUMMAF"- D:Dry C--Ccired WrWoshed trace OtolO% CGhe3ionless Den ity Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 15, UP=Undisturbed Piston little 10 to20% 0-10 Loose 0-4 Sof t 30 + Hard Rock Coring 10-30 Med.Dense 4-8 M/Stiff Sompies TP=Te3t Pit A=Auger V=VoneTest some 20to35% 30-50 * Dense 8-15 Stif f UT=Undisturbed Thinwall and 35 to 50% 50 + Very Dense 15-30 V-Stiff HOLE No SHEET AMERICAN PILE DRIVING EQUIPMENT CORPORATION DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R 1. HOLE NO. BH-2 To Fenton G. Keyes-& Assoc. ADDRESS . Providence, R.I. proposed ntenance -- I Quonset Point, R. LINE 6 STA. PROJECT NAME Ma i S ho LOCATION REPORT SENT TO above PROJ. NO. OFFSET SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO. 72-553 SURF. EL EV. Dots IN-1 GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR. Rods-11AW" START 2123/77 At -61211 after 1/4 Hours Type H/S S/S - COMPLETE 2/23/77- Size 1. 0. Auger 1 319" TOTAL HRS. At 31811 of ter-1-12 Hours Ho,,e, Wt. 140# BORING FOREMAN P. 8 resc i a BIT INSPECTOR boo G 15 FTK* Hammer Fall - 3-0 SOILS ENGR. L" O-C'ATION OF BORING: .:7 Cosin Sample Type Blows per 6" Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION 9 Strata SANO.- Blows Depths Of on Sampler Remarks include color, gredation, Type of Density Change soiletc. Rock- color, type, condition, hard - Pw From - To Sample lrom To or ness, Drilling time, seams and etc. 7No, Pe'-) foot 0-6 1 6-12 12-18 Consist. Elev. 01-116" D 20 25 26 Moist 11 Frost - Brown fine SANDI 1 -1-8 - very trace of silt & fine dense gravel - Fill 7 41611 1 7- 3 3 Moist 5`61601 D Brown fine to coarse SAND, 2 loose little silt, trace of fine 81611 ravel - Fill Wet Dark Brown PEAT mixed witb 10'- H '6"' -D 7@ 5 5 fine Sand, little fine R.:_ stiff 121 qravel 121-131611 D 13 20 26 Ve-t Gray Brown fine to coarse dense SAND, some fine to medium gravel, little silt 14 151- 161611 D 13 11 11 Wet 7- medium I dense -7 D 17 --17= 201-211611 2-1 YeTlow Brown fine SAND & 21161, Silt, trace of fine gravel Bottom of Boring 21'611 -7- GROUND SURFACE TO H/S /A "@;SING: THEN 5 1 S-Poon to 21, $61, Sample Type Proportions Used 1401b Wt. x 30"foll on 2"O.D. Sampler SUMMARY D--Dry CzCored W=Woshed tmce Otolo Cohesionless Densit Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring JL@-' % * y UP-.Undisturbed Piston little IOIo2O% 0-10 Loose 0-4 Sof t 30 + Hard Rock Coring SoMpl*$ 10-30 Med. Dense 4-8 M/Sliff TPsTestPit A:Auger V:VoneTest some 2oto350/C 30-50 Dense B-15 Stiff 117zlinAiletwhod ThinwMi cind '%5t6Sf)0/- Va" none& M-ILM I HOLE NO. 8 H BORINGS TAKEN AT KIEFER PARK V-5- American Drilling & Baring Co., Inc. SHEET- OF DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R. 1. TO Fenton G.Keyes Assoc. JADDRESS Providence, RI HOLE NO. BH -1 PROJECTNAME Quonset Pt.Facilitiei;__P1aTLocATiON North Kingstown,R1 LINE & STA, REPORT SENT TO above PROJ. NO. OFFSET SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO. 72-030 SURF. ELEV, TIme GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE B Rods-AW START 719176 91- ., At 611 after 1/2 Hours Type BW S/S COMPLETE 7/2/76 1A. casing@301 Size 1. D. 2h" 1-3/8" TOTAL MRS A. 300#,L 14 BORING i6kMAN A. DIXT=o At of ter Hours Hammer Wt. BIT INSPECTOR IHammer Fall 247- -SOTT- SOILS ENGR. LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type Blows per 6" Moisture Strata SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE Blows Depths of on Sampler Remarks include color, gradation Type of 0L Density Change soiletc. Rock- color, type, condition', hard - M per From - To Sample From To or foot ev. ness, Drilling time, seams and etc. No7Pen Rec. 12-18 Consist. El 6 01-11-6" D 1 2 2 dry Dark brown TOPSOIL,little 1 1811211 7 1 100fia 2'-0" IfIne gravel jill 31 40 42 dry Brown fine SAND,some silt, 29 51- 61-6"_ D ifil is 21 dense Little,fine gravel, Fill 2 18'11" 110 47 142 wet 19 101-111-6' D 'A 15 medium Gray fine,to medium SAND, 3- 18' 10 1, dense Little silt 34 27 '151-161-6" D 15 21 31 wet 111rown fine SAND,some silt 4- 1811211 42 - very - 57 dense 181-011 103 160 moist Da.rk gray fine SAND,some 28 20'-21'6" D 55 62 58 very 5 18-112" 30 -dense silt & fine gravel, Till 68 231 -0" 1 46 wet IQ Gray-brown fine to coarse 90 251-261-61_ D 121, 13 13 medium SAND,Some silt,some fine 6 18`12" 60 dense 27'-0" aravel 74 Gray fine SAND & silt, 80 wet Trace fine gravel, Till 83 30'-3l'-6" D 46 66 103 very -311-611 7 18' 10" - 11-fill ny in,)An" dense - Refusal-Bot. of Boring 31'-6" F I Ox open end AW to-,,' 1404-3*0" GROUND SURFACE TO lot USED BW -"CASING: THEN S-/S--tD- 11'6"-rhpn n-p-rnd-refus 1 Sample Type Proportions Used 1401b Wt.x 30"fall on 2"O.D. Sampler SUMMARY.., ,n D=Dry C=Cored W=Washed trace . isity ohesive ot,io% Cohesionless De ' C i Consistency Earth UP=Undisturbed Piston little 10 to20% 0-10 L o as e 6-4 Soft 30 + Hard Rock Coring 10-30 Med. Dense 4:,6 M/Stiff Samples __7- TP=Test Pit A=Auger V=Vane Test some 20to350/6 30-50 - Dense 8 5 Stiff UT=Undisturbed Thinwall and 35to5O% 50 + Very Dense 15-30 V-Stiff HOLE NO.BH-1 TOWN PRESS - EAST PROV. American Drilling & Boring Co., Inc. SKEET OF 2 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R. 1. DATE To Fenton G.Keyes Assoc. ADDRESS Providence, RI HOLE NO. BH-@ PROJECT NAME Quonset Pt.Facilities Pla Nortb Kingstown,R.I. LINE a STA. REPORT SENT TO above LOCATION OFFSET I PROJ. NO. SAMPLES SENT TO JOURJOBNO. -72-030 SURF ELEV. - =fne. GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS Date Rods-AW CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR. _61f START 1/6/76 rn At- 9 after 1/ 2 Hours Type BW S/S COMPLETE 7/6/76 :M: Size 1. D. 2k" 1-3/8" TOTAL HRS. At after Hours BORING FOREMAN A. WE _21 10 Hammer Wt. 300# 140# BIT INSPECTOR Hammer Fall SOILS ENG.R. LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 14 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPLE Q6 Blows Depths of on Sampler Density Remarks inciud ecolo; gTdation, Type of W per Change soil etc. Rock- color, type, condition, hard- foot From - To Sample From To or ev. ness, Drilling time, seams and etc. No. Pen Rec. -1.2- 12-18 Consist. El 3 01-1'-611 D 1 1 1 2 dry Dark brown TOPSOIL 1 1811711 4 1 12 18 22 12 51- 61-61" D 14 16 22 dry Gray-brown fineto coarse, 2 1&'112" 14 Idense SAND,little fine gravel 16 wet 101-111-6" D 14 17 13 dense T T7812" 12 14 20 22 wet medium 12 191-161-61, D 12 14 15 dense 4 18 .'112" In 12 120'-2l'-6" D 12 1 15 Gray-brown fine SAND,trace 7 8T 14 fine gravel, trace silt 25'-26'-6" D 10 17 6 18" 12" 261-6111 Bottom of Boring 26" -6" @ 4 6 2 14 0 GROUND SURFACE TO 25' USED BW CASING: THEN _377-to 291611 Sample Type Proportions Used 1401bWt.x30"fallon2"O.D. Sampler SUMMARY: D=Dry C=Cored W=Woshed trace 0t0I0% Cohesionless Den C 's've Consistency Earth Bor,-ng--_ZB 6" ohe little 10 t020% @-4 Sof t UP=Undisturbed Piston 0-10 Loos, 30 + Hard Rock Coring 10-30 Med. Dense 4 PI 8:B M/Stiff Sam es TP=Test Pit A=Auger V=Vone Test some 20to350/c 30-50 - Dense 5 Stiff and 35to5O% 50 + Very Dense 15-30 V-Stiff UT=Undisturbed Thinwall I I HOLE NO.BH`2 American Drilling & Boring Co., Inc. SHEET OF 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R. 1. DATE -3 TO Fenton G.Keyes Assoc. @S Providence, RI HOLE NO. BH ADORES North Kingstown, K. I.- LINE & STA. PROJECT NAME Quonset Pt.Facilities,F-lan ILOCATION REPORT SENT TO above I PROJ. NO. OFFSET SAMPLESSENTTO -_ TV JOURJOBNO. 72-U3U SURF. ELEV. GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS .Rods-AW CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR. Date Time go START 7/2/76 p.m. At after 1/4 Hours Type BW S/S COMPLETE 7/2/76 I.M 2k11 in: Size 1. D. 1-3T8-" TOTAL HRS. BORING FOREMAN D IV =eo At aft er Hours Hammer Wt. 300# 1 BIT INSPECTOR IHammer Fall 3011 SOILS ENGR. LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 It Moisture Strata SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE Remarks include color, gradation, Type of Blows Depths of on Sampler Density Change soiletc. Rock-color, type, condition, hard- Q per From - To So To or 0 mple - From foot 2 12-18 ness, Drilling time, seams and etc. No. P6n Rec. i Consist. Elev. .3 01-11-611 D 3 4 6 dry Brown TOPSOIL & vegetation 1 _18"12T 4 loose 2'-Q" Little fing gravel. FILL dr Brown fine SANDV some silt, 16 Trace fine gravel 12 5'_ 61-6" D 14 15 19 1 dense 2 16 71-011 41 56 - moist Gray fine SAND,some silt, 78 lot-111-611 D 130 1 57 109 very Some fine gravel, Till - dense 3 (al 2, Refusal-Bot.ofBoring 12'-0" -DXX open end AW rod 300#.3o,- GROUND SURFACE TO 101 USED BW -"CASING: THEN SIS 6, o.e.rod to refusal Sample Type Proportions Used 1401bWt.x3O"foIlon2:'0.D. Sampler SUMMARY- D=Dry C=Cored W=Washed trace ot,io% Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring UP=Undisturbed Piston little IOto2O% C-1 e 0-4 Sof t 30 + Hard Rock Coring 0 Loo:n TP= Test Pit A=Auger V=Vone Test some 20to350/c to-3o Med.D se 4-8 M/Stiff Samples 30-'50 - Dense 8-15 Stiff UT=Undisturbed Thinwall and 35to5O% 50 + Very Dense 15-30 V-Stiff [HOLE NO. BH-3 17-A American Drilling & Boring Co., Inc. SHEET OF,1 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R. 1. DATE TO Fenton G.Keyes Assoc. DDRIESS Providence,R.I. HOLE NO. BH-4 PROJECT NAME Quonset Pt.Facilities Plan LOCATION North Kingstown,R.I. LINE & STA. REPORT SENT TO above OFFSET of I PROJ. NO, 72-U3U SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB No. SURF. ELEV. GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS Rods-AW CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR.' Dote Time M START 7/6/76 O:M. P At- 81 after 1/4 Hours BW S/S casing@20' Type COMPLETE 7/6/76 Size 1. D. 2k" --3 -/8 TOTAL HRS. 51 BORING FOREMAlij A. D ATe-T Tol At - hole open of ter--Y-2 Hours Hammer wt. 300# 140# BIT INSPECTOR Hammer Fall 2411 SOILS ENGR. LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type Blows per 6" moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPLE Blows Depths of on Sampler Density Remarks include color, gradation, Type of a. Change soil etc. Rock- color, type, @ondition, hard- uj per From- To Sample From To or foot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist. Efev. ness, Drilling time, seams and etc. No. I PenlRec. 4 01-11-15" D 1 3 2 dry Brown TOPSOIL & vegetation 1 18'1112" 5 loose 21-01' 6 5 - moist medium Brown fine to coarse SAND, 6 5t- 61-611 D 7 11 17 dense Some fine to medium gravel, 7--f"8 TT AR .Trace silt 15 R 1 -011 20 29 1 wet Brown fine to coarse SAND, 7 10'-11'-611 edium Some fine, gravel,trace silt -j- -1 T rr-2w D 15 14 m 8 dense 129-01, 9 Dark brown fine to medium 6 SAND, little silt, trace coarse sand & fine gravel 5 151-16'-6 D 5 1 7 8 4- 18111111 14 171-011 16 21 1) 1; Gray fine SAND,little silt, 17 D 7 12 15 trace fine gravel 5 18" 12" 19 221-011 Gray fine SAND & silt, 30 wet Little fine gravel, Till 25'-26 -6" D J_@_ 17 20 dense 261 6 18" 12" Bottom of Boring 26'-6" 25 OUND GR 350 SURFACE TO USED 13W CASING: THEN 5/5 to Sample Type Proportions Used 140IbWt.x3O"foIlon2"O.D. Sampler SUMMARY D--Dry C=Cored W=Woshed trace 0toI0% Cohesionless Den C h , Consistency Earth Boring ng 's've 0 e little 00 0-10 Loc's"' @-4 Sof t '30 + Hard Rock Coring LIP= Undisturbed Piston (0to2 16 ,e TP=TestPit A=Auger V=VoneTest some 20to350/, 10-30 Med. Dense 4-8 M/Stiff Samples 30-E 8-15 Stiff UT=Undisturbed Thinwall and 35to50% 1 50-+ 15-30 V-Stiff POLE NO.B American urilling & Boring Co., Inc. SHEET 00 1 100 WATER STREET DATE EAST PROVIDENCE, R. 1. Fenton G.Keyes Assoc. Providencie,R.1. HOLE NO. B11- 5 T JADDRESS LINE 8 STA. PROJECT NAME Quonset Pt.Facilities I I LOCATION North Kingstown, R.I. REPORT SENT TO above PROJ. NO. OFFSET SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB No. 72-030 SURF. ELEV. Date Time' GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS Rods-AW CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR. _' G-In START 7/2/76 p.m. BW S/S . q.m, A, 51 after 1/4 Hours Type COMPLETE 7/2/76' P.M. hole op .en Size 1. D. 2k" 1-3/f TOTAL MRS. A.D1ATeTr5- At after Hours 300# -1-4 0- V 13ORING FOREMAN Hammer Wt. BIT INSPECTOR Hammer Fail 2411 SOILS ENGR. LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type Blows per 6" Moisture Strata SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE Blows Depths of on Sampler Density Remarks include color, gradation, Type of W per From- To So To or Change soiletc, Rock-color, type, condition, hard- mple From - I r-I foot 0-6 6-2 12-18 Consist. Elev. ness, Drilling time, searns and etc. No. Pe'P I Rec. 6 01-11-611 D 1 2 4 dry Brown TOPSOIL,trace fine 1 18112" 7 loose 21-0" Isand 14 19 mo st 12 5'_ 61-611 D_ 141 dense Brown fine SAND,trace silt 2 18'11" 17 20 74 moist Gray very fine SAND,little 17 10 -11 611 D 7 dense silt 19 121-011 44 q A Gray fine to medium SAND, 39 moist 15'-16' n 26 142 very Somesilt,some fine gravel, 4 12" 7" @16' DXX 180)0" dense 60-011,T111 Refusal-Bot.ofBoring W-101" D, (X cM end AW rod 3ooo-30- GROUND SURFACE TO USED BW CASING: THEN S IS o. e. rod t O=r@ Sample Type Proportions Used 1401b Wt. x 30"fall on 2"O.D. Sampler SUMMAR*: D=Dry C--Cored W=Washed trace 0tol0% Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency @Eorth Boring , 'S e 4 Soft 30+ UP=Undisturbed Piston little 10 to20% 0-10 Lco, Hard Rock Coring 10-30 Med. Dense 4-8 M/Stiff Samples TP=Test Pit A=Auger V=Vane Test some 20to350/c 30-50 - 8-15 stiff UT=Undisturbed ThinwoJI and 35to5O% 50 + Verl 15-30 V-Stiff @HOLE NCI. BH-5 TOWN PIPS% - PAST 911MV 17-1 0 i American Drilling & Boring Co., Inc. i SHEET 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE, R. 1. DATE Fenton G.Keyes Assoc. Frovidence, R_ I. HOLE No. TO Plan ADDRESS North KingstowTVR. I. LINE a .iSTA. PROJECT NAME Quonset Pt.Facilitiei_ ILOCATION REPORT SENT TO above PROJ. NO. OFFSET SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB No. 72-030 SURF. ELEV. Dote Time GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS Rods-AW CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR. 91 START 7/6/76 P.m At- BW S/S 9.M. casing @20' after- Hours Type COMPLETE 7/6/76 P.M. Size 1. D. 2k" 3 _/8 TOTAL HIRS, At of ter-_ Hours BORING FOREMAN A* DIATe-T =.o Hammer Wt. 300# 140# BIT INSPECTOR Hammer Fall 2411 30" SOILS ENGR. LOCATION OF BORING: Casing Sample Type Blows per 6" Moisture Strata SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE Blows Depths of on Sampler Density Remarks include color, grodation, Type of a. Change soil etc. Rock- color, type, condition, hard- Li per Fro m To or foot From - To Sample 0-6 1 6-1 ness, Drilling time, searns and etc. No. Pen I Rec.. 2_12-18 Consist. Elev. 3 01-Il-6" D 1 3 3 dry Brown TOPSOIL,some fine sand.1 18,111, 4 loose and gravel,Fill 5 4 q -011 12 dry Brown fine SAND, trace silt, 6 5'- 6'-6"- D 17 10 medium Trace sea shells,FILL 2 18"10" 7 dense 1-011 8 8 9 9 wet 4 10 1 11 -6"' D 3 3 loose Gray-brown fine SAND,some j 1:0-- M 5 peat 5 4 141-0. 1 wet Brown fine to medium SAND, 15'-16'-6 D 8 8 13 medium fine gravel,trace Little 20 dense Silt 24 24 25 20 -()?1 17 20'-2116" D 8 12 13 Rusty-brown fine SAND &silt 5 18"12"' 70 90 24'-6"Refusal 249-241611 DXX 11SO ()If Bottom of Boring 24'-6" Open end AW rod GROUND SURFACE TO 24' USED BW --"CASING; THEN o.e.rod to refusal Sample Type Proportions Used 140lbWt.x3O"fallon 2"O.D. Sampler: SUMMAR ry C=Cored W=Woshed trace 0toIO% Cohesionless Dens, ty Cohessive Consistency Earth Raring 2 611 UP=Undisturbed Piston little 10to20% 0-10 Loose. -4 Sof t 30 + Hard Rock Coring TP=Test Pit ArAuger V=VoneTest some 20to350/c 10-30 Med. Dense 4-6 M ./Stiff Samples 30-50, Dense. 13-15 Stiff UT=Undisturbed Thinwall and 35to5O% 50 + Very Dense 15-30 V-Stiff HOLE NO.BH-6 TOWN PRESS - EAST PROV. V-11 I I I 1@1%1'11 1 01% I I le @@ I , 0 @@ 0, I I '@ !4 q'I I I IV% - 1@ I , I., ; @ @@ e- I I I I I I I I I w a@ ,@@p &4UN f I El I COOM MUMMSS V - I COST ESTIMATES Summary The cost of developing Quonset Point Technical Park was determined based on the present conditions and the assigned usage of the land areas. Quonset/Davisville was divided into 26 separate land areas. These areas are described in the text for each development scenario. Included in each land area is.the cost of demolition, utilities to service the area, site preparation and site improvements. Based on this criteria, a cost per square foot was determined and assigned each land area. The costs of utility improvements on the main roads servicing Quonset/Davisville was estimated separately and is reflected herein. VI-1 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO I Land Area No. Acreage Site Development Cost 1 100 $2,241,389 2 12 287,496 3 85 2,221,560 4 30 653,400 5 120 2,688,600 6 8000 L.F. Bulkhead and pier area 18,386,429* 7 225 5,439,050 8 126 Navy retained land 9 209. 5tOO7,222 10 49 lr463,664 11 21 5151618 12 235 Navy retained land 13 75 1,782,400 14 16 479,888 15 9 218,922 16 68 2,057,744 17 7 171,706 18 66 1,841,376 19 7 177,706 20 16 425,328 21 40 1,098,000 22 5 165,200 23 5 168,100 24 8 271,464 25 14 359,620 26 22 596,376 TOTAL COST $48,718,758 *From Ocean Port Development Costs VI-2 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO II LAND AREA NO. ACREAGE SITE DEVELOPMENT COST 1 100 $ 2,241,389 2 12 287-,496 3 85 2,221,560 4 30 653,400 5 120 2,688,600 6 4000 L. F. buUthead @15,201,519* 7 225 -51439,U50 8 120 Navy Retained Land 9 209 5,007,222 10 -49 1,463,664 11 21 515,618 12 235 Navy Retained Land 13 75 1,945,750 14 16 479,888 15 9 218,922 16 68 2,057,744 17 7 171,706 18 66 1,841,376 19 7 177,706 20 16 425,328 21 40 1,185,120 22 5 176,090 23 5 178,990 24 8 271,464 25 14 390,112 26 22 596,376 TOTAL COST 45,836,090 *From Ocean Port Development Costs. VI-3 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO III L-and Area No. Acreage Site Development Cost 1 100 $2,241,389 2 12 287,496 3 85 21221,560 4 30 653,400 5 120 2,688,600 6 7 225 5,439,050 8 120 Na r.etained land 9 vb I 209 510 222 10 49 1,463,664 11 21 K5,618 .12 235 Navy retained land 13 75 1,945,750 14 16 479,888 15 9 218,922 16 68 2,057,744 17 7 171,706 18 66 1,841,376 19 7 177,706 20 16 425,328 21 40 1,185,120 22 5 176,090 23 5 178,990 24 8 271,464 25 14 390,112 26 22 596,376 TOTAL COST $30,'634,571 VI-4 PRIMARY ACCESS CORRIDOR COSTS Basic Cost Assum2tions Mainline Roadways @ $110 L.F. Collector Distributor Roadways.@ $ 40 L.F. Ramps @ $-50 L.F. Turning Roadways @ $',40 L.F. Structures @ $ 45 S.F. Misc. Items & Utilities @ 15% of Total Cost ESTIMATE OF PRIMARY ACCESS ON NEW LOCATION Mainline Roadway 2,000 L.P. @ $110/L.F. $2,200,000. Collector Distributor Roadways 10,000 L.F. @ $ 40/L..F. $ 400,000. Ramps 3,500 L.P. @ $ 50/L.F. $ 175,000. Route 4, Turning Roadways 5,000 L.F. @ $ 40/L.F. $ 200,000. Davisville Connection 5,000 L.F. @ $ 40/L.F. $ 200,000. Structu res 18 more or 'less for a total area of 99,000 S.F. @ $ 45/S.P. $4,455,000 SUBTOTAL $7,6 30,000. 15% Misc. Items & Utilities $1,144,500. SUBTOTAL $8,774,500. R.O.W. Cost of $1.5 Million TOTAL $10,000,000. VI-5 RAILROAD SPURS COSTS A1 01 SPUR TRACK I *Length of Rail 7,0601 @ $601FT $420,000. Turnouts 2 @ $15,000 $ 30,000. Grade Crossings 4 @ $7,000 $ 28,000. SUBTOTAL $478,000. SPUR TRACK II Length of Rail 3,4001 @ $60/.FT $204,000. Turn6uts 0 Grade Crossings 1 @ $7,000 $ 7,000. SUBTOTAL $211,000 SPUR TRACK III Length of Rail 4,2001 @ $60/FT $256,000'. Turnouts @l @ $15,000 $ 15,000 SUBTOTAL $267,000. TOTAL $956,000. *Cost per linear foot of track includes ballast, ties & rail VI-6 OCEAN PORT DEVELOPMENT COSTS DREDGING NEW CHANNEL AT PIERS 1. Material Useable For Backfill At Bulkhead & Pier Construction 1,020,194 CU. YD. @ $1.75 $1,785,340. 2. Excess Material (Offsite Disposal) 1,831,454 CU. YD. @ $2.75 $5',036,499 BULKHEAD CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $6,821,839 Cellular Steel Shee t Pile Construction 4000 L.F $8,379,680 CONSTRUCTION OF PIERS Steel Sheet Piling Conc Deck 4000 L.F $3,184,910. TOTAL $18,386,429. VI-7 Sanitary Costs Davisville Piers and Navy Retained Area 12" Ducti le Iron Pipe 2500 LF @ $35.00' $ 87j500. 18" Sewer 3000 LF @ $42.00 $125,000. 24" Sewer 7,500 LF @ $50.00 $375,000. Broadway Pumping Station L.S. $250,000. Subtotal including 20% $1,005,000. Contingency Quonset Pt Area 14" Ductile Iron Pipe 2600 LF $40.00 $104,000. New pumping station to be -located at treatment plant site L.S. $250,000. *Subtotal including 20% contingency $424,800. TOTAL $1,429,800. *Based on assumption that the existing 14" FM will be used and extended to the proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant. VI-8 STORM DRAINAGE COSTS Major Drainage Outlets Flightpath Site and Davisville Piers 14800 LF @ $125/LF $1,850,000. Personnel Support Area 1200 LF @ $90/Lf $ 108,000. Roger Williams Way 3800 LF @ $112.50/LF $ 455,000. Kiefer Park 1500 LF @ $100/LF $ 150,000. Reve nue Producting Area 3000 LF @ $100/LF $ 300,000. TOTAL $2,863,000. Costs Summary *Development Scenario I $63,967rO58 *Development Scenario.--II--,...... $61,084,890 *Development Scenario 111 $45,616,371-- *This total represents the costs of the primary access corridor, railroad spurs, ocean port development, sanitary system and storm drainage. It does not represent the costs of site acquisition. VI-9 -1 I *N'b I <(", 4A,4e I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 lk ,4w I I Appon m W- - I OAA COASTAL SERVICES CTR I A RY ll@ - 3 6668 14110535 5