Onslow County land use plan update, 1986

[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

ONSLOW COUNTY

LAND USE PLAN

1986 UPDATE

COASTAL ZONE
INFORMATION CENTER

PREPARED BY:

TALBERT,COX & ASSOCIATES, INC.

HD
211 0PTION : FEBRUARY 16, 1987
.N8 IFICATION : MARCH 27, 1987 The preparation of this document
057 was financed in part through a
1987 grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by
the Coastal Zone Management Act of
1972, as amended, which is
administered by the office of
0cean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.

1986

ONSLOW COUNTY
LAND USE PLAN UPDATE

Prepared By

ONSLOW COUNTY PLANNING BOARD

and

ONSLOW COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

Assistance By
TALBERT, COX & ASS06IATES, INC.

"The preparation of this report (map, document, etc.) was
financed in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided
by the Coastal Resource Management Act of 1972, as amended,
which is administered by the office of ocean and Resource
Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration."

Local Adoption: February 16, 1987
CRC Certification: March 27, 1987

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1986 Land Use Plan Update
for Onslow County

PAGE

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A. Information Base (Effectiveness of Previous Policies) 1

B. Present Conditions 2

1. Present Population and Economy 4

2. Existing Land Use 14

a. Significant Land Use Compatibility Problems 17
b. Major Problems Resulting from Unplanned
Development 18
C. Areas Experiencing or Likely to Experience
Changes in Predominant Land Use 18

3. Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations 20

a. List and Summary of Existing Plans

(1) Transportation Plan 20
(2) Community Facilities Plan 20
(3) Utilit-ies Extension Policies 20
(4) Open Space and Recreation Policies 21
(5) Prior Land Use Plans and Policies 21
(6) County Disaster Relief Plan 21

b. List and Brief Description of Enforcement

(1) Zoning 21
(2) Subdivision Regulations 22
(3) Flooding 22
(4) Building 22
(5) Septic Tanks 22
(6) Historic District 22
(7) Nuisance 22
(8) Dune Protection 22
(9) Sedimentation 23
(10) Environmental Impact Ordinance 23

C. Constraints - Land Suitability

1. Physical Limitations for Development 24

a. Hazard Areas, Including Man-made Hazards 24
b. Areas with Soil Limitations 24

EAGE

(1) Hazards for Foundations 28
(2) Shallow Soils 28
(3) Poorly Drained Soils and 28
Limitations for Septic Tanks

C. Water Supply 30

d. 12% Slopes 31

2. Fragile Areas 31

a. Coastal Wetlands 31
b. Sand Dunes 32
C. Ocean Beaches and Shorelines 32
d. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines 33
e. Public Trust Waters 34
f. Complex Natural Areas 34
g. Areas that Sustain Remnant Species 35
h. Unique Geologic Formations 35
i. Registered Natural Landmarks 35
j. Wooded Swamps 35
k. Prime Wildlife Habitat 37
1. Scenic and Prominant High Points 37
M. Archaeologic and Historic Sites 37

3. Areas with Resource Potential 38

a. Productive and Unique Agricultural Lands 38
b. Potentially Valuable Mineral Sites 39
C. Publicly-Owned Forests, Parks, Fish and
Gamelands 39
d. Prime Farmland 40

D. Constraints - Capacity of Community Facilities 41

1. Existing Water and Sewer 41

2. Design Capacity for Water Treatment, Sewage
Treatment Plant, Schools, Landfill and Primary
Roads 42

3. Level of Utilization and Capacity for Water
System, Sewage System, Schools, Landfill
and Primary Roads 43

E. Estimated Demand 48

1. Population and Economy 48

a. Seasonal Population 48
b. Local Objectives Concerning Growth 49
C. Forseeable Social and Economic Change 49

PAGE

2. Future Land Need 49

3. Community Facilities Demand 49

POLICY STATEMENTS

A. Resource Protection 51

1. Areas of Environmental Concern 51

a. Coastal Wetlands 51
b. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines 52
C. Public Trust Areas 52
d. Archaeological Sites 53
e. Ocean Hazard Areas 53

2. Hazardous and Fragile Land Areas

a. Freshwater Swamps 53a
b. Marshes 53a
C. Maritime Forests 53a
d. Cultural & Historic Resources 53a
e. Man-made Hazards 54
f. Hurricane & Flood Evacuation Needs 54
9. Protection of Potable Water Supply 54
h. Use of Package Treatment Plants for Sewage
Treatment Disposal 54
i. Storm Water Runoff from Agriculture,
Residential Development, Phosphate or Peat
Mining and Their Impact on Coastal Wetlands,
Surface Waters or other Fragile Areas 54
j. Marina and Floating Home Development 55
k. Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas 55
1. Development of Sound and Estuarine System
Islands 55

B. Resource Production and Management 56

Policy Statement on:

1. Productive Agricultural Lands (Executive Order
#96) 56
2. Commercial Forestlands 56
3. Existing and Potential Mineral Production Areas 57
4. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries, Including
Nursery and Habitat Areas 57
5. Off-Road Vehicles 57
6. Residential and Commercial Land Development 57
7. Peat and Phosphate Mining and Industrial
Impacts on Resources 57

EAGE

C. Economic and Community Development 59

1. Types and Locations of Industries Desired 59
2. Local Commitment to Provide Services to
Development 60
3. Types of'Urban Growth Patterns Desired -
Redevelopment of Developed Areas 61
4. Commitment to State and Federal Programs Include
Erosion Control, Public Access, Highway
Improvements, Port Facilities, Dredging Military
Facilities 62
5. Assistance to Channel Maintenance and Beach
Nourishment Projects, Including Provision of Borrow
and Spoil Areas, Provision of Easement for Work 63
6. Energy Facility Siting and Development 64
7. Tourism and Beach and Waterfront Access 64
8. Coastal and Estuarine Water Beach Access 64
9. Anticipated Residential Development, Densities,
location, Units Per Acre and Services Necessary
to Support Development 65
10. Beach Area Development Policy 66
11. Clean County Committee 67
12. Mobile Home Ordinance 68

D. Storm Hazard Mitigation 69

1. Hazard Map 69
2. Existing Land Uses and Structures in Hazard Areas
(portion of tax base subject to damage) 69
3. Monetary Value of Structures in Hazard Area 69
4. Hazard Mitigation Policy 69

Hurricane Damage Assessment and Reconstruction Plan 70

III. LAND CLASSIFICATION 90

A. Developed 91
B. Transition 91
C. Community 92
D. Rural 92
E. Conservation 92

IV. RELATIONSHIP OF POLICIES AND LAND CLASSIFICATION 96

V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION 98

VI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 98

APPENDIX

Public Information Meeting Notices
Beach Access Article
Department of Transportation Improvements List
Advanced Population Estimates
Commission Candidates' Ideas on Land Use Issues
Corps of Engineers Letter (Reference Wetlands)
1981 Land Use Plan Policies in Implementation of Goals
and Policies

TABLES

Page No.

Table 1 Onslow County Population Growth 4

Table 2 Population by Township 4

Table 3 Onslow County Population Change
by Age Group Between 1970 and 1980 5

Table 4 Urban and Rural Population 7

Table 5 Population Density and Land Area 7

Table 6 Number of Households and Persons per Household 7

Table 7 Employment by Industry 8

Table 8 Acres of Harvested Cropland Estimated Income 9

Table 9 Fishing Industry Pounds Caught/Value 9

Table 10 Forestry, 1983 10

Table 11 Tourism Income 10

Table 12 Gross Retail Sales 11

Table 13 Per Capita Personal Income 12

Table 14 Soil Limitations 25

Table 15 Onslow County Water System 30

Table 16 Onslow County School Capacity 45

Table 17 Future Population Projections 47

MAPS

Page No.

Population Change, 1970-1980
3

Land Area Not Available for Development 13

New Subdivision Locations Since 1984 16

General Soil Maps 27

Good Agricultural Land Map .27a

Prime wildlife Areas 36

Existing School Sites 46

Beach Area Development Policy for Onslow Beach 66a

Existing Land Use Map (Attached)

Composite Hazards Map (Attached)

Land Classification Map (Attached)

ONSLOW COUNTY LAND USE PLAN UPDATE

1986-1987

Policy Changes Between the 1981 Plan and 1986 Plan Update

The following represents 'changes in policy between the 1981 and
1986 plans or improved means for implementation of policies that
were outlined in the 1981 plan with implementation policy in the
1986 plan.

1981 Plan 1986 Plan

Page 81: Growth of Onslow County Page 66a: Beach Development

Allow development to occur in an Page 66a of the Plan Update
orderly manner and'establish a contains a graphic and verbal
Land Use Plan by which policy on beach development
development proposals may be which can be used to review
reviewed for consistency. development for consistency as
recommended in the 1981 Plan.

Page 82: Estuarine Shoreline Page 55
Development

Future development should be A density of 3-4 units per acre
compatible with the nature and would be permitted only if all
the values of the estuarine local, state, and federal
system. regulations are met and a
minimum of impervious surfaces
is used.

1981 Plan did not address marine Page 55
and floating home development.
Onslow County supports the
development of marines, in
compliance with applicable CAMA
regulations. Floating home
development has not taken place
in the County, and because of
potential damage to water
quality, the County will not
encourage floating home
development.

Page 88: Residential Page 68: Mobile Home Ordinance
Development

Policy is to encourage the County policy will be to work
development of various housing toward the adoption of a mobile
types (such as mobile home home park ordinance.
parks, PUD's, apartments
conventional homes) in proper
location.

LAND CLASSIFICATION MAP

1981 Plan 1986 Plan

Page 97: Rural Classification Page 94

The 1981 Plan was amended to The 1986 Plan has included much
provide a point system to allow of the County in high density
residential development, provided transition and lower density
a total of 50 points can be transition, which permits
accumulated through a point residential development to
system. eliminate the need for the
point system used in the 1981
(See pages 97-98 of 1981 Plan for Plan.
details of system.)

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I @
I DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
I

ONSLOW COUNTY LAND USE PLAN

A. INFORMATION BASE

The 1986 Land Use Plan Update for Onslow County has been
prepared in accordan ce with requirements of the North Carolina
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). Specifically, this document
complies with Subchapter 7B, "Land Use Planning Guidelines," of
the North Carolina'Administrative Code, effective July 17,1985.

The initial Land Use Plan was prepared for Onslow County in
1976, and the first update in 1981. According to the Land Use
Planning Guidelines, the major purpose of periodic updating of
local land use plans is to identify and analyze newly emerging
community issues,and problems. An additional element which was
not required in either the 1976 Plan or the 1981 Update is a
"Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post-Disaster Recovery, and Hurricane
Evacuation Plan," and is required to be included in the 1986
Update. This element is designed to help local governments coor-
dinate effective policies and actions relating to the impact of
hurricanes or other severe storms.

The guidelines further give the following objectives the
update should meet:

to further define and refine 1-ocal policies and issues;
to further examine and refine the land classification
system and the land classification map;
to assess the effectiveness of the existing land use
plan and its implementation;
to further explore implementation procedures, and;
to promote a better-understanding of the land use plan-
ning process.

Both the 1976 Land Use Plan and the 1981 Update provided
much of the needed information base for this update. However, in
many cases, new information had to be developed or has become
available since the 1981 Plan was completed. A number of data
sources were used during the preparation of this plan to prepare
updated analyses of population, housing, economics, (including
agriculture, fisheries, and forestry), and existing land uses.
Most of the data came from primary and secondary sources in the
form of direct contacts with representatives of various state and
federal agencies and/or previously published documents or reports.
@lso, "windshield" surveys were conducted to obtain data on exist-
ing land use patterns. Interviews were conducted with various
County officials, and extensive effort was made before beginning
the planning process to obtain citizen input on issues of local
concern.

B. PRESENT CONDITIONS BACKGROUND

In preparing background information on Land Use and Economic
Conditions for Onslow County, it was apparent that if current
trends continue, Onslow County will continue to experience.popula-
tion and economic growth. Current land use patterns have been and
will likely continue to be influenced by access to major thorough-
fares, ease of access to Camp Lejeune which is a major employer in
the area and access to the County water system. Also, the sea-
sonal and permanent population of areas like West Onslow Beach,
Sneads Ferry, Chadwick Acres, and the Queens Creek areas near
Swansboro will continue to experience substantial growth because
of waterfront access and ease of access to Camp Lejeune.

Waterfront property or property adjacent to the County's
extensive estuarine system is in demand for development. The
County would encourage development of these areas as the market
justifies, as long as future developments are sensitive to this
extensive estuarine system and meet applicable federal and state
regulations.

Areas such as Southwest Onslow, Gum Branch Road and Piney
Green Road have been and will most likely continue to experience
substantial growth due to the geographic relationship of these
areas to the City of Jacksonville and entrance gates serving Camp
Lejeune. As shown on the General Land Use Map, several features
such as the Camp Lejeune base, the Great Sandy Run Poccosin, a
portion of which may be purchased for Camp Lejeune expansion,
Hofmann Forest and Hammock State Park take up over 50% of the
County's total land area. These large land areas restrict devel-
opment.to those areas of the County remaining and as discussed
earlier. The remaining areas of the County, outside the County's
four municipalities, is made up primarily of agricultural land,
forested areas, residential and commercial development located
along the County's primary and secondary highway systems. Natural
features such as poor soil conditions and flood hazard areas,
"A-zone," further restricts the areas available in the County for
development.

Onslow County's economy is made up of, primarily, service
business, retail business, and construction. Although the County
does have some industry, work is being done by a full-time
Director of the Economic Development Commission to encourage more
industry. Currently, most of the job opportunities are at Camp
Lejeune, or in businesses that provide sales and services to resi-
dences as well as visitors to the area. Commercial fishing, agri-
cultural, and forestry provide job opportunities f-Dr Onslow
citizens, but on a relatively small scale. The seasonal popula-
tion and related businesses should continue to expand with the
extensive development now taking place or being planned for the
West Onslow Beach area.

TCVVN5HIP MAP
Population Change 1970-1980

RICHL-ANDS

39
RiCHI-@05 TW-P
19 NEY GREEN RD

JAC Ke 0 1 LLF- 'rw. P HITIZ- OAK -T-WP.
@3 JAC i LLe

SOUTHWEST ONSLOW

SWANS50RCCD)
12

Mp 6OUND
-T. W. P-
..35

H01-LY

Population 19.70-1980

Township Rank Increase Loss

White Oak 1 39%
Stump Sound 2 35%
Richlands 3 19%
Swansboro 4 12%
Jacksonville 5 -3

1. Present Population and Economy

The most current population information for Onslow County is
the 1980 Census data and the North Carolina Office of State Budget
and Management estimates for 1985. As shown in the 1981 Land Use
Plan, Onslow County had the following population in 1980 based on
Census information.

Table 1: Onslow County Population Growth

Population % Increase

1930 15,289 17.0
1940 17,939 17.0
1950 42,047 134.0
1960 86,208 105.0
1970 103,126 20.0
1980 112,784 9.0
*1985 124,987 10.8% (5 years)

Source: 1980 U.S. Bureau of the Census
*July 1, 1985 N.C. Office of State Budget and Management

As shown on Table I, Onslow County continues to experience a
steady rate of growth based on 1985 population projections, and
this trend will most likely continue.

Table II below reflects population changes by township for
1960, 1970, and 1980.

Table 2: Population by Township

Township 1960 1970 % Change 1980 % Change

Jacksonville 40,834 55,737 36 54,111 - 3
Richlands 7,331 7,572 3 9,006 19
Stump Sound 5,486 5,545 1 7,500 35
Swansboro 21,678 20,800 - 4 23,380 12
White Oak 10,879 13,472 24 18,787 39

Total 86,208 103,126 20 112,784 9

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census

As shown in Table II, between 1960 and 1970, Jacksonville
experienced the largest increase in population during that period.
However, between 1970 and 1980, the 1980 Census information showed
that Jacksonville Township lost population. This census figure is
questioned by local officials. Between 1960 and 1970, the White
Oak Township area was experiencing the second fastest growth rate,
and the 1980 Census information indicates that this growth trend

continues in this Township. Specifically, between 1960 and 1980,
the Township has nearly doubled in population from 10,879 people
in 1960 to 18,787 people in 1980. Much of this growth may be due
to the relationship of this area to Jacksonville and gate access
points at Camp Lejeune. During this same 10-yeAr period, between
1970 and 1980, the Stump Sound, southeast of Jacksonville, has
grown from 5,545 people in 1970 to 7,500 people in 1980, which
represents a 35% increase in population during the 10-year period.
Much of this growth appears to be concentrating in the Sneads
Ferry area between U.S. 17 and Onslow Beach. Because of easy
access to Jacksonville, major highways, beaches, and availability
of County water, the Stump Sound, White Oak, and Swansboro
Townships will probably continue to experience increases in
population during the planning period. Richlands Township is a
more rural part of the County with a 19% increase in population
between 1970 and 1980.

Table 3: Onslow County Population Change by Age Group
Between 1970 and 1980

Increase/
Decrease in Percent
Age Group 1970 1980 Population Change

Under 5 9,609 10,282 673 + 7.0
5-14 18,037 14,802 -3,235 - 17.9
15-24 42,927 43,715 788 + 1.8
25-34 12,927 17,849 4,922 + 38.0
35-44 8,672 9,857 1,185 + 13.7
45-54 5,368 7,111 1,743 + 32.5
55-64 3,182 5,020 1,838 + 57.8
65 & over 2,404 4,746 2,342 + 97.4

Total 103,126 113,382 10,256

Table 3 reflects the fact that between 1970 and 1980, the 65
and over age group experienced the largest percentage increase in
population, from 2,404 in 1970 to 4,746 in 1980, which represents
an increase of 2,342 people or a 97.4% increase. The 55-64 age
group experienced the second largest percentage of growth, with
*57.8%. This increase is indicative of national trends which
reflect the aging of Americans, and this trend will most likely
continue in Onslow County as more people find this area an attrac-
tive area for retirement and.the aging of those citizens that
remain in Onslow County-

Table 3 shows the 25-34 age group as the fourth fastest
growing age group in the County; specifically, from 12,927 in
1970 to 17,849 in 1980, which is a 38.0% increase over this
10-year period. This expanding age group will continue to have a
positive affect on the local economy wtih the establishment of new
households and related purchases of needed goods and services.

The 5-14 age group is the only age group that decreased in
population between 1970 and 1980. This decrease may reflect the
national trend to marry at a later age and reduced family size.

Table 4 shows how the County continues to shift from a rural
county (81.8% rural in 1950, 35.4% rural in 1980). In 1950, the
County was 18.2% urban, while in 1980, the County was 64.6% urban,
with much of the urban-type growth taking place near Jacksonville
and along the major highway corridors, such as 24, 258, and U.S.
17. Table 5 shows that the population density in 1960 was 114
people per square mile, with 148 people by 1980. Although the
population density is increasing, it is still relatively low when
you compare this density to'New Hanover County, which has the
third highest density in the State, with a 1983 density of 589.7
people per square mile.

Table 6 shows a substantial increase in the number of house-
holds established between 1970 and 1980, while at the same time,
the number of persons per household is dropping. Specifically,
during the 10-year period, 7,546 new households were established
in the County.

In summary, the County has been and will most likely continue
to grow in population. If current trends continue, more and more
of the population will concentrate in urban type areas and fewer
in rural areas. Because of job opportunities in Jacksonville and
Camp Lejeune, many of the younger age groups will locate in areas
such as Stump Sound, White Oak and Jacksonville Townships. The
older age groups will most likely continue to settle in or near
Swansboro and Stump Sound with access to beach areas and water-
front access.

TABLE 4
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
% OF URBAN AND RURAL POPULATION

1950 1960 1970 1980

Urban 18.2 20.5 57.5 64.6

Rural 81.8 79.5 42.5 35.4

Source: State Government Statistical Abstract, Fifth EdMon,
1984, North Carolina

TABLE 5
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
POPULATION DENSITY AND LAND AREA

1960 1970 1980

Land Area in Square Miles

763 114 135 148

Source: State Government Statistical Abstract, Fifth Edition,
1984, North Carolina

TABLE 6
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS AND PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD

1960 1970 1980

Number of Households 17,185 22,761 30,307

Persons Per Household 3.82 3.40 2.96

Source: State Government Statistical Abstract, Fifth Edition,
1984, North Carolina

EXISTING ECONOMY

The 1981 Land Use Plan briefly discussed the fact that Onslow
County had at that time a very stable economy, which was attrib-
uted to the presence of Camp Lejeune, new industries, and thriving
seafood businesses. As in 1981, Camp Lejeune personnel and civil-
ian jobs available there have a very positive effect on the Onslow
County economy. As discussed earlier, Onslow County has a service
and tourism economy, with many jobs being created to provide ser-
vices or sell products to local and visiting purchasers of goods
and services; however, the local economy is shifting from agri-
culture and fishing to more of a retail and tourist economy, as
shown in the following table:

Table 7: Eml2loyment of Persons 16 Years Old or Older by Industry
1980, Onslow County, North Carolina

6,986 Wholesale and Retail Trade

3,454 Manufacturing

2,829 Public Administration

2,355 Educational Services

2,301 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Business.
and Repair Services

2,173 Construction

1,825 Transportation, Communications, other
Public Utilities

1,361 Personnel, Entertainment and Recreational
Services

1,317 Health Services

Soo Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Mining

761 Other Professional and Related Services

Source: 1984 Profile of North Carolina Countif--s

As Table 7 shows, in 1980, nearly 7,000 jobs in Onslow County
were in wholesale and retail trades, with nearly 3,500 jobs in
manufacturing. Service industries, such as finance, insurance,
real estate, business and repair services, and construction repre-
sented another 4,400 jobs, while agriculture, forestry, fishing,
and mining represented only 800 jobs in 1980.

Ttkble 8: Acres of Harvested Cropland and Estirated Farm Incane

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984

Acres of Harvested 51,500 55,300 50,000 44,300 44,900
Crcp Land

Estimated Fam 28,859,000 33,811,000 32,974,000 32,376,000 32,340,000
Incane

Source: Fifth Edition 1984 North Carolina State Government Statistical
Abstract

When we look at the acres of harvested cropland and estimated
farm income between 1980 and 1984 on Table 8, we see that acres
harvested have been reduced by 6,600 acres, while farm income for
the same period increased from $28,859,000 in 1980 to $32,340,000
in 1984. Although agriculture remains a very important part of
the Onslow economy, Table 8 shows that this part of the economy is
not growing as are other areas of the economy, such as retail
sales and tourism expenditures. Like agriculture, the fishing
industry and forestry continue to provide job opportunities and
have a positive impact on the economy. However, as shown in
Tables 9 and 10 and as reflected in Table 7, few local jobs are
provided by these industries and a relatively small amount of
income, is generated in each area.

Table 9: Fishing Industry in Onslow County - Pounds Caught/Value

Year Pounds Value

1980 4,092,464 $3,385,907
1981 2,377,552 1,993,147
1982 4,078,931 4,346,447
1983 2,995,544 3,005,742
1984 2,829,568 3,217,880
1985 3,039,006 2,905,366

Source: Division of Marine Fisheries

Note: Higher percentage of shellfish in total pounds
caught produces higher value

Source: N.C. Marine Fisheries

Specifically, T&ble 9 shows that the pounds caught and value
of fish caught between 1980 and 1985 have decreased. In 1980,
4,092,464 pounds, worth $3,385,907, were caught; while in 1985,
3,039,006 pounds were caught, with a value of $2,905,366. This
represents a reduction of over 1,053,000 pounds caught and over
$519,000 less value during this five-year period.

Although these dollar amounts appear to be relatively small
compared to other sections of the economy such as retail sales,
the fishing industry, both commercial and recreational fishing, is
a very special and important part of the local character and
economy of Onslow County and continues to provide job
opportunities.

Table 10: Onslow County Forestry, 1983

Estimated Value to Land Owner $3,016,000
*(Includes Public and Private Land)

Value of Logs Delivered to $6,052,000
**Point of Manufacturing . I

Source: *Commodity Survey from N.C. Division of Forest Resources
**Stump Value Composite, Division of Forest Resources

Based on 1983 figures, Onslow County owners of timberland,
both public and private, received an estimated $3,016,000 for cut
timber, which generated a value of logs delivered to private manu-
facturers of $6,052,000. Again, this segment of the economy is
very important, but like agriculture and fishing, few jobs are
created, with a relatively small impact on the local economy com-
pared to areas such as retail sales and tourism.

Table 11: Onslow County Tourism Income, 1980-1985

1975* $14,983,000
1979* 20,493,000
1980 30,027,000
1981 29,984,000
1982 31,208,000
1983 32,117,000
1984 43,624,000
1985 41,564,000

*1981 Land Use Plan

Source: N.C. Travel and Tourism Division, Department of Commerce

As shown in Table 11, one of the fastest growing segments of
the economy is tourism. The 1981 Land Use Plan showed the County
receiving $14,983,000 in tourism income in 1975, with $20,493,000
in 1979. From 1980 to 1985, Onslow County's tourism income
increased from $30,027,000 to $41,564,000, which represents a
.38.4% increase during the five-year period. With excellent public
beach access, existing and proposed beach front and sound front
development and improved access from the Piedmont scheduled for
completion during the planning period, this segment of the economy
will most likely continue to expand.

Table 12: Gross Retail Sales, Onslow County

1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85_

Retail Sales $364,909,567 $406,957,094 $462,355,522 $539,007,283 $568,385,273

Food 101,486,612 111,847r827 122,265,808 + +

General 60,310,446 73,148,09.5 82,050,339 + +
Merchandise

Autos 74,871,601 85,747,401 93,909,821 + +

Building mat. 18,703,227 20,271,183 26,644,539 + +

(+ information not available)

Source: N.C. State Government Statistical Abstract, Fifth Edition, 1984

Table 12 shows that retail sales.for Onslow County have
increased from $364,909,567 in 1980 to $568,325,273 in 1985, which
represents 56% increase in five years. Some of this increase is
attributable to inflation; however, inflation has been relatively
low during this period. Most of this increase is simply due to
new businesses opening, continued increases in population, and
more tourists visiting the area..

Table 13 shows that per capita personal income has continued
to increase for Onslow County. This increase is most likely
attributable to the shift from a rural county to more of an urban
county, with more population, more jobs, and, therefore, increased
incomes.. As the population grows and more job opportunities and
better paying jobs are made available, the per capita personal
income will continue to increase.

TABLE 13
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PER-(A ITA PERSONAL MUM-
1969 - 1981

.6-. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81
S tate 2,959 3,220 3,410 3,789 4,241 4,587 4,860 5,1350 5,770 6,475 7,125 7,780 8,656
Onslow 2,828 3,314 3,339 3,931 4,341 4,851 4,.661 4,834 4,499 4,934 5,401 5,989 7,089
Pender 2,034 2,357 2,495 2,808 3,203 3,462 3,765 4,031 4,380 4,901 5,485 6,054 6,892
New Hanover 3,175 3,398 3,555 3,970 4,386 -4,677 4,964 5,497 6,002 6,728 7,591 8,339 9,158
Wake 3,677 3,962 4,182 4,563 5,018 5,465 5,922 6,459 7,026 2,835 8,851 9,633 10,623
Durham 3,376 3,680 4,072 4,460 4,711 5,176 5,711 6,225 6,744 7,498 8333 9,158 10,095
Mecklinburg 4,066 4,305 4,622 5,091 5,542 5,974 6,381 6,954 7,592 8,490 9,523 10,335 11,460
Guilford 3,864 4,154 4,444 4,920 5,381 5,890 6,179 6,708 7,274 8,204 9,045 9,913 10,943
Forsythe 3,705 4,025 4,,243 4,652 5,182 5,654 6,101 6,776 7,459 8,198 8,958 9,912 11,014

Sources: Septsuber, 1984, Profile, North Carolina Counties

TOWN5HIP MAP
LAND AREA NOT AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENI

RICHL-At,405
1-(O'=MAAIN FOq,--:5T-

% 0

RD
PINEY GREEN

JACK150 IL W. P Wt-ilTj:- OAY, 7-Vv P.

ACK5' V1 LLF-

SOUTHWEST ONSLOW

6WAN6E30RC:,

CAMP 1--E:jc-:uNf7--

UMP OUNQ
T. W. P.

GREAT

SANDY RUN

POCOSIN

HC:>LL,r
R I CNS @-z
NOT AVAILA BLE

OR SUITABLE FOR

DEVELOPMENT

2. Existing Land Use

The 1981 Land Use Plan did not include an existing Land Use
Map. However, the 1981 Plan did include statistical information
on the County that showed that over 23.5% of the County was in
commercial forests with Camp Lejeune taking up another 22.4% of
the County's land area. Hofmann Forest, located north of Jackson-
ville, included over 11% of the County's land area with all of
this area being unavailable for residential or commercial develop-
ment. These three large land areas represent over two-thirds of
the County's land area, leaving one-third or more of the County's
land area for development. Much of the future commercial and
residential development will most likely occur as in-filling
development in or near Jacksonville and Swansboro. As discussed
earlier, many of the current and future job opportunities are
available in Jacksonville and at Camp Lejeune, and for this reason
many of the new subdivisions and mobile home parks are being
developed in new areas with good highway access to Jacksonville.
Also, numerous developments have been and continue to open in the
Swansboro and Stump Sound Townships primarily because of water-
front access in these two townships.

Based on the windshield survey conducted by Talbert, Cox &
Associates, Inc., in 1986, the following observations are made
concerning existing land use on a township basis. (See Map #1,
Existing Land Use.)

Swansboro Township

Most of the non-residential uses in this area are located
along major thoroughfares such as N.C. 24, S.R. 1509 and a few
along N.C. 172. Much of this is wooded with most residential uses
being located adjacent to State roads. The Pines is a large
single family development located off of N.C. 1501, another
smaller development of new homes is located on N.C. 172 near the
entrance to Camp Lejeune. Oyster Bays Estates is a new develop-
ment on the waterfront overlooking the White Oak River with se ,ver-
al new homes and several remaining lots for development. Several
mobile home parks are located throughout this township with many
of them having minimal improvements. With the availability of
County water in the area, good access to Camp Lejeune and Jackson-
ville, and water access at Queen's Creek and the intercoastal
waterway, this area will probably continue to experience rapid
growth. Swansboro is the only municipality in this township.

Stump Sound Township

Stump Sound continues to be one of the fastest growing
sections of the County. Sneads Ferry and Chadwick Acres west of
U.S. 17 are two areas of this township with the greatest extent of
development. Highway 210 has a clustering of commercial uses at
the intersection of N.C. 172 and a new shopping center at State
Road 1518. This area also contains numerous mobile homes

parks. Stump Sound Township, between U. S. 17 and the inter-
coastal waterway is served by the County water system as is the
West Onslow Beach area. A portion of West Onslow Beach is served
by a private sewer system which is located at the intersection of
N. C. 210 and S. R. 1518. The West Onslow Beach area of Stump
Sound Township is continuing to experience rapid growth with many
new low-rise and high-rise condominiums being located at the
northern tip of the beach. A large undeveloped portion of beach
remains between Highway 210 and the northern end of the beach, but
many development plans are being discussed or implemented. Also,
plans are being made to move the existing road back away from the
beach to provide additional room for development between the new
road location and beach front. The western portion of Stump Sound
Township is made up primarily of the Great Sandy Run pocosin and
some residential development along N. C. 50 near Holly Ridge.
Holly Ridge is the only municipality in this township.

White Oak Township

This township is located in the northeastern part of the
County, specifically, east of U. S. 17 and north of N. C. 24.
Primarily, this area's dominant land use, like other parts of the
County, is residential lots along transportation corridors with
forested areas throughout. The greatest concentration of develop-
ment is located in the Piney Green Road area which has good access
to U. S. 17 and N. C. 24. This township has been and will most
likely continue to experience rapid growth because of its geo-
graphic location to Camp Lejeune and Jacksonville. This township
does not contain any municipalities; however, over 90% of the area
is served by the County water system.

Jacksonville Township

1980 Census information for the Jacksonville Township showed
a 3% decrease in population between 1970 and 1980. However, based
on the windshield survey conducted in 1986, it would appear that
this decrease as reversed dramatically due to the numerous mobile'
home parks now located in this area. Also, the enclosed map show-
ing the location of new development approved by the Planning Board
since 1984 shows a large number located in the Jacksonville Town-
ship. Specifically, in the Southwest Onslow Area and along Gum
Branch Road. The Southwest Onslow Area includes land from State
Road 1107 and 1213 north to the Jacksonville planning jurisdiction
line. New developments, like Beach Tree Hollow and West River,
located on S. R. 1105 are developed with attractive single family
homes. State Road 1111, 1108, 1109 and portions of N. C. 53 have
a heavy concentration of mobile home parks mixed with single
family homes along the same road fronts. At the southern portion
of this township and near the Pender County line, the primary land
use is forested areas with some rural housing along the major
thoroughfares. Very few agricultural operations are located in
this portion of the County.

MAP

NEW SUBDIVISION LOCATIONS SINCE 1984

RICH L-AN 05
140PA4AA/Al FOR.,F-5T

% 0Is
RicHt@@0,5 TW-P
@@ . k PINEY GREEN RD
OYSTER SAY
JAC K15 0 IL* I- IvV. p ;:,17i=- OAK 7.W.P.
EST ATEI
.Is JACK15' N V1 LL F-
SOUTHWEST ONSLOW*-,@.

WANt-,f50Rc=,
WEST RIVER 7. P.

& BEACH TRAIL HOLLOW

@5TUMP 50UNC)
T. w. P.

HOL-L'y"
R I DS

SOURCE ONSLOW COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Richlands Township

This township is the most rural portion of Onslow.County with
much of the non-residential uses being concentrated along major
thoroughfares like U. S. 258 or in the Town of Richlands. Like
the southern portion of Jacksonville Township, the predominant
land use is forested areas; however, there are also several large
areas of this township being used for farming operations, partic-
ularly near the Jones and Pender County lines. Much of this town-
ship is also served by the County water system. This township
also contains the Albert Ellis Airport, which is located near S. R
1101. Although this township has not been growing as rapidly as
those townships closer to the water or Jacksonville, it is con-
tinuing to grow as reflected by several new subdivisions approved
for this area since 1984 (See New Subdivision Map).

Summary

As discussed earlier, Onslow County continues to shift from a
rural county to a more urban county with a rather low density of
development. The new.subdivision map reflects the fact that since
1984, when the Planning Department began keeping records, new
development has been located throughout the County in areas suit-
able for development and with easy access to primary and secondary
roads. Because less than 1/3 of the County's land area is avail-
able for development, County officials wish to encourage develop-
ment in areas that meet market needs as long as proposed develop-
ments do not adversely impact on the environment. With Planning
Board review and approval, Local and State CAMA approval, and
Corps of Engineers review and approval, County officials feel that
future development will not adversely impact on the environment.

a. Significant Land Use Compatibility Problems

The 1981 Land Use Plan discussed problems with malfunc-
tioning septic tanks and how amended septic tank regula-
tions would provide better protection in the placement
and use of future septic tanks. Although these more '
stringent regulations will provide better guidance in the
use and location of septic tanks, it does not affect
those systems already in operation in soils with poor
absorption and filtering qualities. This land use com-
patibility problem will continue until either a package
treatment system is utilized rather than modified septic
systems or until a County or private sewer system can be
installed for use in lieu of existing individual
systems.

Traffic volumes continue to increase along major highway
corridors, such as U. S. 17, 24, and 258, with continued
strip development along these corridors as was occurring
and discussed in the 1981 Land Use Plan. The primary
function of these major thoroughfares is to efficiently
and safely provide for the movement of vehicles and con-

tinued strip development will reduce speeds, create
numerous opportunities for turning movements, and effec-
tively reduce the efficient functioning of these thor-
oughfares. Ultimately, these thoroughfares will become
so congested that alternative routes will have to be
purchased or expensive land acquisition will be required
to widen these existing facilities to carry future traf-
fic volumes.

Better land use controls such as zoning or adoption of a
thoroughfare plan with adequate setbacks will provide a
better means to control those areas that have not already
developed along these major thoroughfares.

b. Major Problems Resulting from Unplanned Development

Following completion of the existing land use survey, two
problems resulting from unplanned development were
observed. Strip development, primarily along major
thoroughfares continues to take place with residential
uses and commercial uses in the same area. As the County
continues to grow, this mixing of uses will make develop-
ment of a zoning map and ordinance more difficult because
of the need to determine what uses are appropriate in a
given area. This problem has been made very apparent as
the Planning Director and Planning Board study the pos-
sible zoning in the Sneads Ferry area.

.The second obvious problem is the numerous mobile home
parks being located throughout the County and particular-
ly in the Jacksonville Township, with little or no design
requirements. Dirt or gravel roads with no'landscape
amenities for these parks has the potential of reducing
property values in surrounding areas if these parks are
not properly maintained.

C. Areas Experiencing or Likely to Experience Changes
in Predominant Land Use

Stump Sound Township

The undeveloped portion of West Onslow Beach will most
likely continue to change from undeveloped land to higher
density resort development on the sound side.

Land use along N. C. 210 from U. S. 17 to the beach will
continue to change due to increasing traffic counts and
the desirability of this property along the major access
point to the Onslow Beach area. The availability of
waterfront property, County water and a private sewer
system will also add additional incentive for land use
changes in this area.

Swansboro Township

Much of this township is served by the County water sys-
tem. Because of good primary and secondary road access
and waterfront access, this area will continue to change
from a rural area to a more densely developed area,
particularly along the waterfront and as property becomes
available for development. The area along N. C. 24 near
Swansboro will most likely experience additional commer-
cial development.

Jacksonville Township

The U. S. 258 and Gum Branch Road area will most likely
continue to experience additional residential subdivi-
sions and mobile home parks. Both of these major
thoroughfares provide convenient and easy access to
Jacksonville and Camp Lejeune. The southwest Onslow
area, again because of beach access, access to Camp
Lejeune and Jacksonville, will most likely continue to
change from wooded areas and open fields to mobile home
parks and subdivisions. Based on the 1986 windshield
survey, this trend is well underway with numerous mobile
home parks already located in the area.

White Oak Township

The primary growth area, and area likely to change in
predominant land use, is along Piney Green Road. Like
other sections of the County, Piney Green Road provides
easy access to the Jacksonville and Camp Lejeune areas.

Richlands Township

Changes in predominant land use for this township will
most likely take place along U. S. 258 and in or near
@ichlands. Also, the airport area may experience some
industrial development at or near the airport; however,
this area is very rural in character at the present.

3. Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations

a. List and Summary of Existing Plans

(1) Transportation Plan (See DOT Improvements
Plan in Appendix)

Onslow County prepared a revised Highway Improvement
Plan in 1986. The plan includes priorities for major
thoroughfare and secondary road improvements with a
request to the North Carolina Board of Transportation
to schedule these improvements on the State's long-
range highway improvements plan. Improvements
include:

.U. S. 17th Bypass
Piney Green Road
S. R. 1001
Gum Branch Road
Western Boulevard Beltline
N. C. 50
Other Secondary Road Improvements

(2) Community Facilities Plan

Although the County does not have a Community Facili-
ties Plan document, the County does have a water sys-
tem plan, airport plan, school system plan, recreation
development policy and is currently working to estab-
lish a sewer policy and plan of action.

(3) Utility Extension Policies

In 1981, the County provided water to properties
located along approximately 300 miles of County roads.
Today, the County water system serves property along
over 600 miles of County roads. Current water exten-
sion policy requires the developer requesting water
service for property outside the County service area
to pay all cost for water line extension. In the
event there are other users between the development
requesting service and the end of the County system,
the County will consider a cost sharing with the
developer. The County charges a $400.00 tap-on fee
for new customers of the system.

The County provides water to Holly Ridge and
Swansboro; however, Richland has its own water system
as does Jacksonville.

(4) Open Space and Recreation Policies

Currently the County has two Regional Parks serving
the County. Hubert By-Pass Park is located in the
Swansboro Recreation District off of N. C. 24 between
Jacksonville and Swansboro. The Onslow Pines Park is
located in the Southwest Jacksonville Recreation
District. Current staff and Recreation Committee
policy is to establish 3 additional regional parks to
serve the Stump Sound, Richlands and White Oak Recrea-
tion Districts. At present, the County does not have
a long-range Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.
However, they have established a goal to provide
recreational facilities in each recreation district.
In addition to the regional parks, the County operates
beach parks at three locations, with a WRC boat ramp
on the island. The County has prepared an Access Plan
using CAMA funds. See Appendix for map showing loca-
tion of beach park facilities.

(5) Prior Land Use Plans and Policies

Onslow County has prepared and adopted CAMA Land Use
Plans in 1976 and 1981. Both of these plans included
background land-use information and policies as
required by the CAMA regulations and both plans have
been used in'the 1986 update.

(6) County Disaster Relief and Assistance

A plan was prepared in 1984 and outlines County
response and action in case of emergency.

b. List and Brief Description of Enforcement

(1) Zoning

The present Onslow County Zoning Ordinance was adopted
by the Onslow County Board of Commissioners on January
4, 1982, and became effective on January 15, 1982. At
present, the only zoning area designated on the
official Zoning Map is the West Onslow Beach area.
The Ordinance is enforced by the Onslow County Plan-
ning Board and Planning Department Staff. The County
Airport is not presently zoned; however, the Airport
does have height restrictions required by FAA.

(2) Subdivision Regulations

The Onslow County Subdivision Regulations became
effective on October 4, 1979. This regulation is also
administered and enforced by the Onslow County
Planning Board and Planning Staff.

(3) Flood Insurance Program

The County has received copies of the preliminary
flood maps and revisions to those maps are currently
being made. The County is currently under the emer-
gency phase of the Flood Insurance Program until offi-
cial maps are available and an ordinance is passed to
bring the County under the regular phase of the pro-
gram. The County will hold a public hearing on
March 2, 1987, to come under the regular Flood Insur-
ance Program. (See Composite Hazard Map #3, which is
based on preliminary flood maps.)

(4) Building

The Worth Carolina Building Code is enforced by the
Onslow County Building Inspection Department and
includes one- and two-family structures.

(5) Septic Tanks

Septic tanks and package treatment plants are used
rather extensively in Onslow County. Enforcement of
qeptic tank use is administered by the County Health
Department using applicable State standards.

(6) Historic District

Onslow County has existing historic and archaeological
sites, but no clusters of buildings for designation as
an Historic District; however, Permuda Island has been
designated as an AEC because of its archaeological
importance and Archives and History has established
development standards for this area.

(7) Nuisance

Onslow County does not have an existing Nuisance
ordinance.

(8) Dune Protection

Dune protection is regulated through the Coastal Area
Management Act requirements. Minor permits are admin-
istered by the County's Permit Officer with major
permits being administered by the State Permit
officer.

(9) Sedimentation

Onslow County concurs with the State's sedimentation
control requirement, and all development in the County
is subject to State sedimentation regulations if more
than one acre of land is uncovered.

(10) Environmental Impact ordinance

Onslow County does not have a local Environmental
Impact Ordinance.

C. CONSTRAINTS - LAND SUITABILITY

1. Physical Limitations for Development

Physical limitations for development include man-made
hazard areas, areas with soil limitations, water sup-
ply areas, and areas with slopes of 12% or greater.

a. Hazard Areas, Including Man-Made Hazards

Like most counties, Onslow County has several
man-made or natural hazard areas that have been
addressed in the County Disaster Relief and Assis-
tance Plan. Flood hazard areas have been identi-
fied as part of the Federal Flood Insurance Pro-
gram and these designated areas, "A" Zone, consti-
tute a hazard area and will, in the future, re-
quire that all new construction within this zone
establish the finished floor elevation above the
"A" Zone elevation to protect the property from
flood damage.

The Ellis Airport, west of Jacksonville, repre-
sents a man-made hazard area. By its very nature
and function, this facility, as any airport, could
be the site of or by its use could facilitate a
plane crash situation for the County. Although an
accident is unlikely, the Disaster Relief Plan
provides a systematic way to handle such a disas-
ter.

A railroad line running parallel to U.S. Highway
17, north of Jacksonville, is a potential man-made
hazard. This line serves Camp Lejeune and the
Havlock area of North Carolina. Both chemical
supplies and other military supplies would be
transported on this line.

Forest fires is another potential man-made or
natural disaster that Onslow County is subject to
because of extensive forested areas.

Camp Lejeune, with transportation and storage of
ordinances on base, is, in itself, a man-made
hazard.

b. Areas with Soil Limitations

When the 1981 Land Use Plan was prepared, the only
soils information available at that time was the
general soils map. Since then, the County has
received a partially completed detailed soils
report for the County with advance copy of soils
maps. We found, in reviewing this information,

=am= mow M mm

SOIL LMTATTONS

TABLE 14
Poorly Limitations
Hazards Shallow Drained For
Symbols Soils For Floundations soils soils Septic Tanks

LY Lynchburg fine sandy loam Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A)
MaC marvyn loamy fine sand, Moderate (A) Moderate (G) Moderate (A) Moderate (E,F)
6 to 15 percent slopes
Mk Muckalee loam Severe (B,C) Severe (A,C) Severe (B,C) Severe (A,B)
Mu Murville fine sand Severe (D) Severe (A,B) Severe (D) Severe (C,D)
NDC Ne4han fine sand, Severe (C) Severe (A) Severe (C) Severe (D)
2 to 30 percent slopes
NoA Norfolk loamy fine sand, Severe (B) Moderate (C) Severe (B) Moderate (A)
0 to 2 percent slopes
NoB Norfolk loamy fine sand, Moderate (B) Moderate (C) Moderate (B) Moderate (A,F)
2 to 6 percent slopes
On Onslaw loamy fine sand Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A)
Pa Pactolus fine sand Severe (B) Severe (A,C) Severe (B) Severe (A,D)
Pn Pantego mucky loam Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A)
Ra Rains fine sandy loam Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A)
St Stallings loamy fine sand Severe (B) Severe (A,C) Severe (B) Severe (A,D)
Sw Swansboro fine sand Not Avail-able Not Available Not Available Not Available
TO Tbrhmta fine sandy loam Severe (B) Severe (A, C) Severe (B) Severe (A, D)
Ur Urban land Not Available Not Avai lable Not Available Not Avai lable
Ut (Pt) Udorthents, wet, sandy Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available
(Pits)
Wa Windo fine sand, Slight Severe (A) Slight Severe (D)
0 to 6 percent slopes
Wo Woodington loamy fine sand Severe (B) Severe (A,C) Severe (B) Severe (A)
W Water Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available
Ya Yaupon silty clay loam Severe (B,E) Severe (C) Severe (B,E) Severe (A, E)
AnB (AlB) Alpin fine sand,
1 to 6 percent slopes Moderate (A) Severe (A) Moderate (A) Slight to Moderate
AuB Autryville loamy fine sand, Moderate (B) Severe (A) Moderate (B) Moderate (A)
1 to 6 percent slopes
Ax Axis mwky sandy loam Severe (C, D) Severe (B) Severe (C, D) Severe (B,C)
BmB ft) Baymeade fine sand, Moderate (B) Severe (A) Moderate (B) Severe (D)
1 to 6 percent slopes

SOIL LDUTATIONS (Page 2)

Poorly Limitations
Hazards Shallow Drained For
Symbols Soils For Foundations soils Soils Septic Tanks

BaB Baymeade-Urban Land Moderate (B) Severe (A) Moderate (B) Severe (D)
Caqplex, I to 6 percent
slopes
BN Beaches-Newhan association, Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available
0 to 30 percent slopes
Bo (BoH) Bohicket soils Severe (C, D,E) Severe (B) Severe (C,D,E) Severe (B,C,E)
Ca (CaL) Carteret Soils Not Available Not Available Not Avail-able Not Available
CO Corolla fine sand Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A,D)
CrB Craven fine sandy loam, Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A,E)
1 to 4 percent slopes
CrC Craven fine sandy loam, Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A,,E)
4 :o 8 percent slopes
Ct Croatan muck Severe (B,C) Severe (D) Severe (B,C) Severe (A,E)
Da Dorovan muck Severe (C,D) Severe (R) Severe (C,D) Severe (B,C)
Dc Duckston fine sand Severe (C,D) Severe (A,C) Severe (C,D) Severe (AOB,D)
DU Duneland sand Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available
FbA Foreston loamy fine sand, Moderate (B) Severe (A) Moderate (B) Severe (A)
0 to 2 percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam, Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A)
0 to 2 percent slopes
GpB Goldsboro-Urban Land Moderate (B) Moderate (C) Moderate (B) Severe (A)
Canplex, 0 to 5 percent
slopes
Gt Grifton fine sandy loam Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A,,B)
KuB Kureb fine sand, Slight to Severe Severe (A) Slight to Severe (D)
1 to 6 percent slopes (A,D) Severe (A)
La Lafitte muck Severe (C,F) Severe (A,C,F) Severe (C,F) Severe (A,B)
Le Lenoir loam Severe (B) Severe (C) Severe (B) Severe (A,E)
Ln Leon fine sand Severe (B) Severe (A,C,E) Severe (B) Severe (ArD)

Hazards for Foundations A-Slope; B-Wetness; C-Flooding; D-Ponding; B-Shrink-Swell; F-Low Strength
Shallow Soils A-Cutbanks Cave; B-Ponding; C-Wetness; D-EKcess Humus; E-EKcess Humus & Ponding; F-Floods; G-Slope
Poorly Drained Soils A-Slope; B-Wetness; C-Flooding; D-Ponding; E@-Shrink-Swell; F-Low Strength
Limitations for Septic Tanks A-Wetness; B-Floods; C-Ponding; D-Poor Filter; E-Perks Slowly; F-Slope

R 0 A 1 0 A I

11 Good Agricultural Land
o 42 Poor Agricultural Land
o
43 Poorly Drained
44 Poorly Drained/liard Pan Soils
5 Poorly Drained
I' Good Agricultura Land
IPoor lTank)
for Septic
a
17 Poorly Drained Soils
@9 Good Agricultural Land
41) Tid.1 M.r.h

o
LEGEND
RAINS-LYNCHBURG-GOLOSBORO ASSOCIATION: .-

KENANSVILLE-DRAGSTIIAISIIIATIIN:

PORTSMOUTH-TORHUNTA ASSOCIATION:

LEON-LYNNHAVEN ASSOCIATION:

2
JOHNSTON-BIBB ASSOCIATION:
-31
CRAVEN-LENOHR ASSOCIATION:

P -PAMLICO ASSOCIATION:
.@.!ZER
2 ED ONSLOW-LUMBEE ASS CIATION: .-
TIDAL MARSH-COASiAL BEACH ASSOCIATION:

2 2.

a 2' GENERAL SOIL MAP
a TENTATIvE: SUBJECT TO CHMGE
ONSLOW COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
U. 5. DEPARTME 'IT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
RALIEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA

R.'. 7-72 Ii-I.j;.w2

= = Im = m = = m

60ap A4,v,"uru9AL- Lamv (0
OOOP A6ZKAJLj1JEaL- LAMP

e:pw -
40.

C-449 Lx-jw4fir Umrrt, 17

V"LAW

CAMP LF-JEUNIE

LAOLJ-Y

that several soils types still remain incomplete;
however, we have taken available information from
the draft report and prepared a soils limitation
chart that reflects soils with hazards for founda-
tions, shallow soils, partly drained soils, and
soils with limitations for septic tank use.

(1) Hazards for Foundations

Soils with hazards for foundations are based
on slope, wetness, flooding, ponding, shrink-
swell factors, and the low strength of soils.
Conditions ranged from slight limitations of
the Wando Line sand (WA) to severe of the
Bohicket (BO) soils based on flooding, pond-
ing, and shrink-swell factors. The present
draft report presently available does not
address the extensiveness of each soil type in
the County. When the detail soils report is
complete, the County will have a better idea
of how extensive the problem is for each con-
straint and soil type identified.

(2) Shallow Soils

Shallow soils included limitations based on
cutbank caving, ponding, wetness.,. excess humus..
and ponding, flooding, and slope. Conditions
ranged from moderate to severe, and again,
information is presently not available to
determine the extent of each soil type in the
County.

(3) Poorly Drained Soils and Limitations for
Septic T nks

Both poorly drained soils and soils with lim-
itations for septic tanks range in severity
from slight to severe. Poorly drained soils
were based on slope, wetness, flooding, pond-
ing, shrink-swell, and low strength. Soils
with limitations for septic tank use were
based on wetness, flooding, ponding, poor
filtering ability, slow perk, and slope.

Because the detailed County soils study is not com-
plete, we have included information on soils from the
General Soils Map. Based on discussion with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture staff, we have glean6d the
following information:

Using the General Soils Map, soil type 1, Rains-
Lynchburg-Goldsboro Association is considered a good
agriculture soil with sandy loam surface and fri-

able, sandy clay loam subsoils. Much of this soil
type is located along the New River in western Onslow
County. Also worth noting is the fact that most of
the larger farms in Onslow County are found in this
part of the County.

Soil type 2--Kenansville-Dragston Association is poor
agricultural land with thick loamy sand surface layers
and friable, sandy loam subsoils. Much of this soil
type is located along the Duplin County and Pender
County line. Much@of this land area is presently
being used for forestry with essentially no agricul-
tural use. This soil type is also found in the Sneads
Perry area and Camp Lejeune.

Soil type 3--Torhunter Association is a poorly drained
soil located primarily in the Hofmann Forest area in
the northern part of the County.

Soil type 4--Leon is a poorly to very poorly drained
soil with hardpan subsoil, making this soil unsuitable
for septic tanks. Much of this soil type is located
along U.S. 17 south-of Jacksonville. There is also a
large section of this soil type located in the eastern
part of Camp Lejeune.

Soil type 5--Muckaleu is a nearly level, very poorly
to poorly drained soils on flood plains and drainage-
ways. This soil type is found along the upper reaches
of New River, Northeast Creek, Queens Creek, White Oak
River, and tributaries running into the Cape Fear
River.

Soil type 6--Craven Association is considered good
agricultural land with moderately well to somewhat
poorly drained soils with very firm clay subsoils.
Although this is good soil for agriculture, it is poor
for septic tanks because of clay content in subsoil.
This soil type is found along each side of U.S. 17
north of Jacksonville.

Soil type 7--Croatan Muck is very poorly drained or-
ganic soils 12 to 50 inches of muck over sandy to
loamy textured soils. This soil type is found primar-
ily in the center of the Hofmann Forest area and the
center of the Great Sandy Run Pocosin.

Soil Type 8--Onslow Association is nearly level to
gently sloping moderately well to partly drained soils
with an intermittent subsurface layer of thick hardpan
friable sandy clay loam subsoils. This soil type is
considered good agricultural soil with much of this
soil being concentrated in the White Oak Township area
along north side of NC 24.

Soil Type 9--Tidal Marsh - Coastal Beach Association
is nearly level land overflowed by hiyh tidewater and
contains sand dunes. All of this soi type is located
along the eastern most edge of the County.
c. Water Supply
Based on a 1984 Ground Water Resource Study pre-
g
pared by Moore, Gardner and Associates, Inc., no
lack & Veach) Onslow County has only two acquiw-
fers, the Castie Hayne and Cretaceous aquifers,
that contain water of sufficient quantity and
uality to be utilized for municipal development.
Re Castle Hayne acquifer can yield up to 4DO-500
gpm of generally-good water quality, but hard in
cbaracter. The Cretaceous aquifer can yield ap-
Proximately @00-600 gpm with excellent water qual-
ity and requiring no treatment. The Cretaceous
aquifer is being used by the County for water
suppl , and this aquifer is being stressed both
localTy and regionally by heavy pumping.
The Onslow County water system is served by six
active wells and over 600 miles of distribution
lines throughout the County Table 15 reflects
the well capacity and safe iield for the County's
six active well sites.

TABLE 15
ONSLOW COUNTY WATER SYSTEM
Supply Wells 1984
Nominal Pump Safe** Well
Well No. CaRacity Yield Ca@?acity*
kgpMj (gpmT kmga)
1 1,066 625 0.45
2 800 625 0.45
3
4 800 625 0.45
5 800 625 0.45
6 800 625 0.45
7 940 625
8 575 0.41
9 660 0.48
10 (under contract Agil 187) 650 0.47
11 Contract Awarded end '87) 600 0.43
12 Contract Awarded (end '87) 300 0.22
Total, gpm 5,206 6,525
mgd 7.5 5.4 2.70
Pump runn,igg 12 hours.per day.
**Recharge will equal withdrawal.
Note: Pump currently 'at Well 9 will be moved to Pump 12.
The County may consider seven (7) additional wells between 1987
and 2000.

Source: January 1985 Water Suppl and Distribution Report
Moore, Gardner & Associffes, Inc. (All references to
Moore, Gardner & Associates, Inc., now means Black & Veach
which has purchased the firm .

d. 12% Slop es

As noted in the 1981 Land Use Plan, with the
exception of coastal sand dunes, steep slopes are
not a problem in Onslow County.

2. Fragile Areas

These are areas which could easily be damaged or de-
stroypd by inappropriate or poorly planned develop-
ment. There are several fragile areas in Onslow Coun-
ty including those areas identified as Areas of Envi-
ronmental Concern (AECs), including coastal wetlands,
estuarine waters, public trust waters, ocean hazards
areas, and Permuda Island AEC for its archaeological
significance. Other areas considered fragile, but not
designated as AECs, are sand dunes along the outer
banks, wooded swamps, archaeologic and historic sites,
and unique geologic formations.

a. Coastal Wetlands

Coastal wetlands are defined as any salt marsh or
other marsh subject to regular or occasional
flooding by tides, including wind tides (whether
or not the tide waters reach the marshland areas
through natural or artificial watercourses), pro-
vided this shall not include hurricane or tropical
storm tides. Salt marsh or other marsh shall'be
those areas upon which grow some, but not neces-
sarily all, of the following salt marsh and marsh
species: Smooth or.Salt Water Cordgrass (Spartina
alterniflora): Black Needlerush (Juncus ro;meri-
anus); Glasswort (Salicornia spp.); Salt - Meadow
Grass (Spartina Patens); Sea Lavender (Limonium
spp.)- Bulrush (Scirpus spp.); Saw Grass (Cladium
iamai@ense); and Salt Weed Grass (Spartina'_Syno-
suroides). Included in this definition of wet-
lands is "any contiguous land as the Secretary of
NRCD reasonably deems necessary to affect by any
such order in carrying out the purposes of this
Section." (G.S. 113-230[al).

Onslow County contains extensive wetland areas.
The first extends from the Pender County line to
and including a portion of wetlands along the New
River not included as part of Camp Lejeune. It is
also bounded on one side by Topsail Island and the
other side by the mainland. Portions of other
bodies of water like Beasleys Creek, Kings Creek,
Mill Creek, Turkey Creek and Chadwick Bay also
contain wetland areas. Much of this wetland area
is accessible by road.

The second wetland area extends from the north-
eastern border of Camp Lejeune to the Carteret
County line. It includes the following areas:
wetlands between the mainland and the Atlantic
Ocean; wetlands along Queens Creek and its tribu-
taries; and the White Oak River as far inland as
Grants Creek. Onslow County contains very exten-
sive amounts of wetlands and those areas adjacent
to these wetlands and water bodies are in many
cases either undeveloped or underdeveloped.
These wetlands along our coast serve as a critical
part of the ecosystem. Estuarine dependent
snies like fish and shellfish make,up over 90%
o the total value of North Carolina s commercial
catch, and therefore, it is necessary that any
future adjacent development be sensitive to this
fragile environment and meet applicable state or
federal regulations for development.

Low tidal marsh also serves as the first line of
defense against shoreline erosion by dissipating
wave action.

b. Sand Dunes

Sand dunes are defined as ridges or mounds of
wind-blown material, usually sand. They comprise
a major portion of the outer banks, which includes
West Onslow Beach, Onslow Beach (Camp Lejeune),
and Hammock Beach State Park. Development with
inadequate design, construction or setback from
the ocean may create problems with the dune's
stability and increase the risk of damage to the
development due to wind and water. Appropriate
land uses shall be only those developments that
are set back from the ocean to limit the risk of
damage and those additions to structures of sec-
ondary usefulness which are unattached (ex. -
gazebos, walkways, decks) and do not cause irre-
versible damaqe. Onslow County requires setback
which is 30 times average annual rate of erosion.
The first line is 601 in front of the stable
natural vegetation with most of Onslow County
having a 21 annual erosion rate.

c. Ocean Beaches and Shoreline

ocean beaches and shoreline are defined as land
areas without vegetation covering and consist of
unconsolidated soil material that extends landward
from mean low tide to a p?int where any one or
combina'-ion of the following occur: (1) vegeta-
tion, or (2) a distinct change in predominant soil
partical size, or (3) a change in slope or eleva-
tion which alters the physiographic land form.

Sand deposits of ocean beaches and shorelines
represent a dynamic zone which does not afford
long-term protection for development. THe nature
of tidal action and the force of storms is such
that they cause the beach areas to shift
constantly. Littoral drift is a natural pheno-
menon whereby sand is removed from beaches by wave
action and littoral currents and'is deposited upon
a different stretch of the beach; this action also
shifts the line of high tide and low tide. Ocean
beaches and shorelines are valuable for public and
private recreation and are located within natural
hazard areas. Thus, development within these
dynamic zones may result in loss of property and
possible loss of life.

Such areas much be preserved to the greatest
extent feasible with opportunity to enjoy the
physical, aesthetic, cultural and recreational
qualities of the natural shorelines of the State.

d. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines

Estuarine waters are defined as all water of the
Atlantic Ocean within the boundary of North
Carolina and all the waters of the bays, sounds,
rivers and tributaries there to seaward of the
dividing line between coastal fishing waters and
inland fishing waters, as set forth in an agree-
ment adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission
and the Department of Conservation and Development
filed with the Secretary of State entitled
."Boundary Lines, North Carolina Commercial
Fishing-Inland Fishing Waters, revised March 1,
1965" or as it may be subsequently revised by the
Legislature.

These areas are among the most productive natural
environments of North Carolina, for they not only
support valuable commercial and sports fisheries,
but are also utilized for commercial navigation,
recreation, and aesthetic purposes. Species
dependent upon estuaries, such as menhaden,
shrimp, flounder, oysters and crabs make up over
90 percent of the total value of North Carolina's
commercial catch, and these species must spend all
or some part of their life cycle in the estuary.
The high level of commercial and sports fisheries
and the aestheti'c appeal of coastal North Carolina
are dependent upon the protection and sustained
quality of our estuarine areas.

e. Public Trust Waters

Public trust waters are defined as all waters of
the Atlantic Ocean and the lands thereunder from
the mean water mark to the seaward limit of State
jurisdiction, all natural bodies of water subject
to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to
the mean high water mark, all navigable natural
bodies of water and lands thereunder to mean high
water mark or ordinary high water mark, as the
case may be, except privately owned lakes to which
the public has no right of access, all waters in
artificially created bodies of water in which
exist significant public fishing resources or
other public resources, which are accessible to
the public by navigation from bodies of water in
which the public has no rights of navigation, all
waters in artificially created bodies of water in
which the public has acquired rights by prescrip-
tion, custom, usage, dedication or any other
means. Included in public trust waters are areas
such as waterways and lands under or flowed over
by tidal waters or navigable waters, to which the
public may have rights of access of public trust
rights, and areas which the State of North
Carolina may be authorized to preserve, conserve,
or protect under Article XIV, Section 5, of the
North Carolina Constitution. The New River and
the White Oak River are examples of public trust
waters.

f. Coastal Complex Natural Areas

Coastal complex natural areas are defined as lands
that support native plant and animal communities
and provide habitat qualities which have remained
essentially unchanged by human activity. Such
areas may be either significant components of
coastal systems or especially notable habitat
areas of scientific, educational, or aesthetic
value. They may be surrounded by landscape that
has been modified, but does not drastically alter
conditions within the natural area. Such areas
may have been altered by human activity and/or
subject to limited future modifications, e.g., the
placement of dredge spoil, if the CR,; determines
that the modifications benefit the plant or animal
habitat or enhance the biological, scientific, or
educational values which will be protected by
designation as an AEC.

Onslow County does not currently have any areas
designated as "coastal complex natural areas";
however, the National Heritage Program office has
several areas that could potentially be designated
as complex natural areas, and they include the
following:

0 Areas of Camp Lejeune
0 Hammock Beach State Park
0 Portions of the Maple Hill Area
0 Hofmann Forest
0 Rock House Caves

g. Areas That Sustain Remnant Species

There are no known Areas that sustain remnant.
species in the County also based on information
from the Wrightsville Beach Office of NRCD.

h. Unique Geologic Formations

As discussed in the 1981 Land Use Plan, Belgrade
Quarry is considered a unique geologic formation.
It has been providing high quality limestone
construction material for almost a quarter
century. The lakes left as a by-product of this
strip mining operation provide an excellent recre-
ational resource, for they are abundant in fresh
water fish and open to public enjoyment. The
Belgrade Quarry is considered a unique geologic
formation; however, it is not considered a fragile
area.

i. Registered Natural Landmark

Onslow County does not have any Registered Natural
Landmarks.

j. Wooded Swamps

Wooded swamps function in a manner similar to
coastal wetlands by filtering pollution, pro-
tecting upland areas from flooding, and providing
important wildlife habitat. "The Corps of
Engineers regulates wetlands that it has deter-
mined to be responsible for under Section 404 of
the Clean WaterAct." The Corps of Engineers does
not regulate all wetlands areas. (See appendix
for letter from Corps of Engineers.)

BELGRADE
HITE OAK IM
ALBEMARLE PAPER SITE
CO. BEAR SANC.

No 110 HUBERT
BE
GAMELAND

9
HELL AND PURGATORY
GAMEL Q4 2
RICH,-.N s JAC SONV LL
m 258
24

24 RHODESTOWN 53

PRIME WILDLIFE AREAS STUMP
AND SANCTUARIES SOUND
FIRE PREVENTION
AND HUNTING
CLUB
ONSLOW COUNTY PLANNING OCIPT. 1981

OLLY RIDGE
PE S OW

k. Prime Wildlife Habitat

Gamelands such as the Hofmann Forest and the Great
Sandy Run Pocosin southwest of Jacksonville and
along Highway U. S. 17 provide excellent wildlife
habitat. All or part of the Great Sandy Run,
approximately 5,200 acres is presently being con-
sidered for purchase by CampLejeune for their
expansion needs. Marsh areas and large bodies of
water such as the White Oak River also provide
prime wildlife habitat. Prime Wildlife Areas are
shown on a 1981 map from the 1981 Land Use Plan.
Although the configuration of some of these areas
may have been modified since 1981, it provides a
general location of existing habitat areas.

l.. Scenic and Prominent High Points

Although the County does not have any designated
scenic or high points, it does have an abundance
of scenic areas throughout the County and particu-
larly along the waterfront areas and marsh areas.
m. Archaeologic and Historic Sites

The Coastal Resources Commission, on November 16,
1984, designated Permuda Island as a significant
coastal archaeological resource area of environ-
mental concern based on recommendations from the
Division of Archives & History. Subsequent to
beginning the LUP Update, the Nature Conservency
has purchased the island and is ne otiating with
the State of North Carolina to sely it to the
State as an area to be protected from development.
Permuda Island is a former barrier island located
within Stump Sound in southwestern Onslow County.
The island is 1.2 miles long and .1 - .25 mile
wide. Archaeological evidence indicates earliest
occupation from the Middle Woodland Period (300
B.C. - 800 A.D.) through the late Woodland Period
(800 A.D. - 1650 A.D.)', and historic occupations
predating the Revolutionary War. Archaelogical
remains on the island consist of discrete shell
heaps, broad and thick layers of shell midden,
prehistoric refuse pits and postholes, as well as
numerous ceramic vessel fragments and well-
preserved animal bone remains. The resources
offer extensive research opportunities.
Significant coastal archaeological res ources are
defined as areas that contain archaeological
remains (objects, features, and/or sites) that
have more than local significance to history or
prehistory. Such areas will be evaluated by the
North Carolina Historical Commission in consulta-
tion with the Commission as part of the procedure
set forth in Rule .0503.

@ignificant coastal archaeological resources are
important educational, scientific, or aesthetic
resources. Such resources would be jeopardized by
uncontrolled or incompatible development.
Specific information on the location of archaeo-
logical sites cannot be given in this report at
the request of the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources; however, Onslow County has
approximately 405 sites, and current County policy
is to submit p@oposed subdivision plans to
Archives and History in Raleigh for their review
and comment on how or if proposed developments
will adversely impact any of these known archaeo-
logical sites.. The County presently has one
structure on the National Register which is the
Palo Alto Plantation at Belgrade; however, the
County does not have any areas with groupings of
structures that could be considered for nomination
as an historic district, with the exception of the
Venters Farm Historic District, which is currently
being nominated to the National Register of
Historic Places. Structures on the study list, as
provided by Renee Gledhill-Early of the Division
of Archives and History include the following:

Dr. Ennett House, Sneads Ferry
Rinqware House, Swansboro
David Sanders Aman House, Belgrade vicinity
James Battle Averette House, Catherine Lake
vicinity
Collins House, Jacksonville
Pelletier House, Jacksonville
R. P. Hinton House, Jacksonville
Hawkins-Glover House, Swansboro
Venters Farm Historic District, Richlands
vicinity

The State of North Carolina is currently consider-
ing the purchase of Permuda Island from the Nature
Conservency to protect this environmentally sensi-
tive area.

3. Areas With Resource Potential

a. Productive and Unique Agricultural Lands
The County detail soil survey is presently in the
draft stage and only an advance coEy of soil maps
and soil types is presently availa le. Current
soils information does not permit the identifica-
tion of the most productive or unique agricultural
lands in the County. Ho efully, whan the soils
study is complete, more Setailed information will
be available to identify this natural resource.

b. Potentially Valuable Mineral Sites

The Great Sandy Run Pocosin southwest of Jackson-
ville is extensive and may contain substantial
amounts of peat. Mining of peat in this area may
become attractive in future years as a potential
source for generation of electricity; however,
this could require much research and higher cost
for other fuels before this would be economically
feasible, but the area does have potential value
for mining of this natural resource.

Martin-Marietta continues to mine approximately
136 acres at the Belgrade Quarry. This is a sub-
stantial limestone quarry and will probably be
mined for many years into the future. Other
mining sites in the County as provided by the
Division of Land Resources includes:

Haugen Sand Pit
Haugen Company, Inc., 3.acres

Justice Sand Pit
Justice Construction 2 acres

Bell Pit
W. R. Willis Construction Co. - 4 acres

Silverdale Pit
Silverdale Marl Company - 5 acres

Jones Mine
Barrus Construction - 11 acres

Moseley Pit
Barrus Construction - 4 acres

Wilson
Barrus Construction - 1 acre

Moseley Mine
Haugen Company - 4 acres

Parkertown Marl Pit
Comer Brothers, Inc. - 5 acres

c.' Publicly-owned Forests, Parks, Fish, and...
Gamelands

As discussed in the 1981 Land Use Plan, there are
three major publicly-owned tracts within the
County, the largest being the U. S. Marine Corps
bases at Camp Lejeune. This federally owned land

accounts for approximately 20% of the County's
total land and is not open for civilian use.

Hofmann Forest, open to public recreational use,
is the second largest publicly owned tract within
the County. It is owned by North Carolina State
University.

The third major publicly-owned area within the
County is Hammock Beach State Park. This park is
developed as open-space recreation with picnicing
areas, camping areas and swimming areas provided.
Access to the beach is via passenger ferry which
makes several round-trips daily. Much of the park
is in its natural state. Forest and other game-
lands have been discussed previously as well as
public trust waters and other water bodies that
provide access for fishing opportunities.

d. Prime Farmland

As discussed earlier, the current draft soils
report for the County does not provide adequate
soils information to map and identify prime
farmland. The Soils Map on page 27a of this
report shows "good agricultural lands."

40'

D. CONSTRAINTS CAPACITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES

1. Existing Water and Sewer

Jacksonville, the major urban area of Onslow County,
obtains its water from two major well fields. The
258 well field is located on Old Tram Road, approxi-
mately six miles west of Jacksonville. The Gum
-Branch well field is located approximately nine miles
from Jacksonville on State Road 1308. The 258 well
site has a production capacityof 1,370 gpm or about
2 mgd. The Gum Branch well field has a water produc-
tion capacity of 2,000 gpm or 2.9 MGD. The Jackson-
ville water system has a storage capacity of
3,300,000 gallons and a production capability of 4.9
mgd. Based on the 1985 Jacksonville CAMA Land Use
Plan, Jacksonville had a water consumption rate of
3.0 mgd (average day) with a 4.80 mgd (maximum day)
which is just below the 4.9 mgd capability of the
Jacksonville system. The Onslow County system and
Jacksonville water'system have 2 interconnections for'
exchange of water in an emergency.

The Onslow County water system is discussed in great
detail in two recently completed reports by Moore,
Gardner and Associates, Inc., which are available at
the County Planning Department. Based on these
reports, Onslow County has a 12 hour well capacity of
2.7 mgd which meets State regulations in providing
the annual average daily demand while operating the
wells for a maximum of 12 hours per day. The average
day demand of 2.2 mgd can be met with pumping of
wells for 12 hours; however, wells must be pumped
longer than 12 hours per day during maximum demand
periods. Richland has its own water system; however,
Swansboro and Holly Ridge are tied into the County
water system.

The distribution system presently consists of over
600 miles of water line and six elevated storage
tanks and the system currently services most of
Onslow County. Specifically, the system, as of
November 26, 1986, had a total of 17,684 accounts,
with an additional 410 commercial accounts as shown
below:

10,757 Residential
4,671 Multi-users (master meter for trailer
parks, multi-family developments, etc.)
940 Municipal
1,316 10 Private Systems
17,684 Homes
410 Commercial Accounts
18,094 Accounts

Well #8 is a new well now in service, with Well #9 in
temporary use. Three additional wells are now being
drilled which, once complete, will provide the County
system with an adequate water supply during the five-
to ten-year planning period, or longer.

Richlands Water system consists of two wells and a
storage tank with a 400,000 gallon capacity. The
Richland Sewer system is currently operating at
80,000 gallon per day of treatment with plans to
upgrade both the sewer plant and sewer mains.

Swansboro is presently purchasing approximately
135,000 gallons of water per day from Onslow County.
The Town has a 100,000 gallon elevated tank with
additional ground storage capacity in the form of an
old 200,000 gallon tank which is presently not being
used. However, consideration is being given to using
this tank as a holding tank to pump water into the
elevated tank. The Swansboro Sewer system is now
treating approximately 125,000 gpd.

Onslow County does not presently have a sewer system;
however, the County is presently conducting a study
to determine the best approach to providing sewage
treatment facilities such as the system currently
serving the northern portion of West Onslow Beach and
pending approval to serve the southern portion of
West Onslow Beach. Jacksonville has a population of
39,000 people resulting in a flow of 4.46 mgd average
with peak flows of up to 12.2 mgd. Holly Ridge has
recently completed a 120,000-gallon capacity sewer
system which is now in operation. Current use is
35,000 gallons per day, with an in-flow of 30,000
gallons per day. Engineers have projected a 20-year
life on the system based on growth trends.

The County presently provides three beach access area
facilities which have been developed with State
assistance. The County continues to work with local
developers in securing additional land for future
access areas and these areas should be adequate to
meet the County's needs during the planning period.

2. Design Capacity for Water Treatment, Sewage Treatment
Plant, Schools, Landfill and Primary Roads

The County water system has a current design capacity
of 2.7 mgd using 6 existing well sites and pumping 12
hours per day. The County currently does not have a
central sewage treatment facility; however, the pri-
vate package treatment facility serving the West
Onslow Beach area has a capacity of 878,000 gpd. The

Holly Ridge sewage treatment facility has a 120,000
gallon capacity.

The Richland Water system has a pumping capacity of
600 gallons per min. using both wells with a storage
capacity of 400,000 gallons. The Richland Sewer
system can treat 216,000 gpd with plans to upgrade
the system.

Swansboro is purchasing water from the County with a
100,000 gallon elevated tank and a potential ground
storage capacity. The Swansboro Sewer system has a
design capacity for treating 300,000 gpd.

Design capacity of Onslow County schools is shown on
Table 16 with a total student capacity of 13,340
students.

The County landfill is located on Pony Farm Road with
150 acres currently being used and an additional 175
acres available for future use. Currently, the
County does not have plans to provide a site in the
eastern part of the County. The existing sites at
Pony Farm Road should be adequate to meet County
needs during the planning period.

Primary roads in the County include US 258, US 17F
NC 24, NC 50, Piney Green Road, Gum Branch Road and
the Western Boulevard Beltline. The State Highway
improvement plan calls for additional lanes along NC
24 and US 258. The 1984 report prepared by Onslow
County makes specific requests to the Department of
Transportation to provide assistance in upgrading
these facilities. (See Appendix, DOT Improvements.)
1985 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

U.S. 17 South at County Line - 5,200 ADT
N.C. 24 between Jacksonville and
Swansboro - 10,000 ADT
U.S. 258 West of Jacksonville - 8,000 ADT
U.S. 17 South of Jacksonville - 10,500 ADT
U.S. 17 North at County Line - 5,500 ADT
N.C. 24 South of Richlands - 6,900 ADT

3. Level of Utilization and Capacity for Water System,
Sewage System, Schools, Landfill and Primary_Roads

The County water system is presently working at or
near capacity with bottlenecks in the distribution
system due to high demand in areas that have contin-
ued to grow and that are presently served by water
lines that are too small. The Janaury, 1985, Water
Supply and Distribution Facilities Report prepared by
Moore, Gardner and Associates recommends improvements
to the distribution system and recommended an in-
crease in the number of wells to increase pumping
capacity. 43

Richland has received approval on an $800,000 water
and sewer Bond Issue. The 400,000 gallon storage
capacity and new improvements should keep this system
adequate to serve Richland needs. The Richland sewer
system is presently treating 80,000 gpd with a capa-
city of 216,000 gpd with plans to upgrade system.
Richland's sewer extension policy requires developers
to pay all cost for sewer extension.
Swansboro has the capacity to treat 300,000 gpd of
waste and is currently treating 125,000 ggd. Based
on the population qrowth the system shoul be ade-
quate during planning period. Swansboro's sewer
extension p9licy requires that developer pay cost for
line extension or upgrading capacity to lift stations
to serve developers' needs.
Swansboro, as discussed earlier,, is purchasing water
from Onslow County.
The package treatment facility presently serving West
Onslow Beach is presently using 64,000 gpd of its
capacity with a commitment for new or planned devel-
opment of an additional 271,000 gpd. The North
Topsail Water and Sewer, Inc. Franchise Area has been
approved to serve the beach sewer needs south of 210
on the beach and portions of the mainland such as
Pages Acres, Golden Acres and Chadwick Acres. As
discussed earlier, Onslow County does not have a
County sewer system; however, the County is studying
what might be an app@opriate approach to providing
sewage treatment facilities for the Count
In February of 1986 a $16 million school @;nd issue
was defeated. As shown on Table 16, several of the
County schools are near or well above design capa-
city. To address this need, the County will have to
consider another bond vote or raise funds through
other means to make school improvements.
The landfill currently being used should be adequate
to meet needs for an additional 6 years based on
information provided by Andy Ennet of the Public
Works Department. Hazardous waste material is dis-
posed of at the Camp Lejeune landfill. At the
present time, there is no landfill facility in the
eastern part of the County which requires a substan-
tial drive to utilize the Pony Farm Road facility.
With the additional 175 acres adjacent to the exist-
ing site, this facility should be adequate through
the y@?ar 2000. Also, the County with six other enti-
ties is studying a possible regional or subregional
alternative trash disposal system.
All of the primary roads discussed earlier in this
plan are at capacity and will require substantial
improvement as discussed in the 1986 Highway Improve-
ments Repqrt prepared by the County and submitted to
DOT officials.

We '40
Onslow County School Capacity

.ONSLOW COUNTY SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT
Final- 5th Month
ADM ARM
School Capacity 1978-791 1980-812 1984-853 1985-864
(4th MonEh)

1. Bell Fork 418 366 385 307 375
2. Blue Creek 616 722 722 881 1,137
3. Clyde Erwin 550 623 640 717 889
4. Dixon Elementary 792 1,090 1,026 858 978
5. Dixon High 560 483 453 668 761
6. Jax. Jr. High 660 532 497 580 620
7. Jax. High 940 1,256 1,202 1,440 1,601
8. Morton Elementary 506 664 697 812 1,076
9. Northwoods Elementary 528 507 535 552 684
10. Northwoods Park 660 714 674 710 784
11. Parkwood 286 455 407 355 608
12. Richlands Elementary 1,034 981 937 889 960
Ln
13. Richlands High 700 595 626 545 601
14. Silverdale 242 260 242 245 283
15. Southwest Jr.-Sr. High 580 784 766 752 853
16. Surmnersill 396 512 564 611 659
17. Swansboro Elementary 462 461 427 561 603
18. Swansboro Middle 352 324 330 373 427
19. Swansboro Jr. High 242 280 224 252 288
20. Swansboro Sr. High 680 655 598 557 602
21. Tabernacle 616 697 708 683 786
22. Trexler 352 521 497 515 502
23. Thompson 528 508 485 468 650
24. White Oak 640 1,021 948 821 878

TOTAL: 13,340 15,011 14,590 15,152 17,605

Source: 1 Onslow County School Survey Report, 1979-80, Division of School Planning
2 1981 CAMA Land Use Plan, Table 30
3 Onslow County School Survey Report, 1984-85 Update, Division of School Planning
4 Mr. C. T. Hoyt, Assistant Superintendent

EXISTING SCHOOL SIl
(INCLUDES CAMP LAJE
1984-85

-w- z

I Z

A. 16

to
J

-CAMO L"EJEUNE 23
24

23.

LEGEND

ELEMENTARY
JUNIOR HIGH/MIDDLE A

SENIOR HIGH

0) CENTRAL OFFICE
13US GARAGE IS

FUTURE POPULATION OF ONSLOW COUNTY

Based on the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management
projections, Onslow County can anticipate continued population
growth during the planning period, as shown on Table 17.

Table 17.
**140,026

140,000
/136,611

**131,515
130,000 .000 *
-128,308
100, I.-A
*1240,987,,oo-
121,fi9l
120,000

112 84
110,000

103,126
VOI
100,000

90,000

86,208

80,000

1960 1970 1980 1985 1990 1995

This growth projection by the State is based on Camp Lejeune per-
sonnel expanding, or at least staying constant, and continued
expansion of the total local economy.

* Advanced Population Estimates for July 1, 1985 based on April 1986
Estimates.

Note: 1990 and 1995 higher population figures based on April 1986
.Estimates for July 1, 1985 of 124,987 population. Used 2.5% increase
in State Management and Budget Projections for 1990 and 1995.

E. ESTIMATED DEMAND

1. Population and Economy

Based on the original and revised population projec-
tions for 1986 and beyond, Onslow County is projected
to continue its growth in population. In April 1986
the State office of Budget and Management increased
the projected 1985 population of Onslow County from
121,891 people to 124,987. This increase represents a
difference between the two projections of approximate-
ly 2.54% and this difference in per cent has been used
to reflect the change in population for 1990 and 1995
if the same assumption used for the 1985 revised esti
mate stays true. Using their revised estimates Onslow
County will increase in population by 15,039 people
between 1985 and 1995.

With the continued efforts of a full time industrial
development office working to expand the industrial
tax base, anticipated increases in tourism and popu-
lation expansion, the economic picture for Onslow
County during the next ten years should be very
bright. obviously, much of this economic expansion
will be based on Camp Lejeune remaining as approxi-
mately the same size and possibly expanding and con-
tinued tourism.

a. Seasonal Poplulation

The 1981 Land Use Plan included information on
seasonal population for the period between 1980
and projected for 1990, but no source for the
information was given. In preparing the 1986
plan, we attempted to obtain information on sea-
sonal population from the Chamber of Commerce, the
County water department and planning department,
and office of Management and Budgett without suc-
cess. At present, much of the seasonal population
occurs between Easter and Labor Day primarily
along the beachfront. Projects such as Saint
Regis, Logerhead, San Marlo, and others are
appealing to the vacationer. Specifically, Saint
Regis, when completed, will have 330 units avail-
able in three buildings. A proposed 14-story
hotel planned for the beach will have 210 units.
Additional condominium projects located primarily
at the northern end of the beach and large trailer
parks at the southern end of the beach, plus
individual beach cottages, will add additional
population to the beach area during the summer
vacation period. Although we do not have a
specific seasonal population estimate, the County
feels that current road, water, and sewer systems

can handle this increased population during the
five- to ten-year planning period.

Local.Objectives Concerning Growth

The primary concern of local officials is to per-
mit expansion of the local economy while being
sensitive to our local natural resources. Giving
individuals a free choice as to location for
housing and shopping etc., as long as it does not
adversely impact on the environment and meets all
current local, state and federal regulations is
the primary objective of local officials.

c. Forseeable Social and Economic Change

As discussed in the population and economic sec-
tion of the plan, Onslow County is shifting from a
rural economy to a more urban economy. Also, the
older population groups are expanding the fastest
which will impact on the types of goods and ser-
vices being required in the future. Also, fami-
lies are becoming smaller in size with the,5-14
age group decreasing in population based on the
1980 census. If these trends continue, Onslow
County will have a much larger population of citi-
zens over 55 and fewer in the younger age groups.

2. Future Land Need

Using the 1985 and 1995 population projection for
Onslow County, County officials can anticipate a popu-
lation increase of approximately 15,039 during that
ten year period. Using the 2.96 persons per household
population figures from the 1980 census this projected
population increase represents an additional 5,080
more households during this 10 year period. Assuming
that current development trends continue, that is
development being located throughout the County, these
5,080 additional dwelling units can easily be accom-
modated in the County. As discussed earlier, based on
the 1980 Census Onslow County had a density of 148
people per square miles which is relatively low. If
you assume a one acre lot per household this repre-
sents approximately 500 acres per year in development
for housing with many of these lots probably already
developed or approved for development,

3. Community Facilities Demand

As discussed earlier, the County water system is now
in place to serve most all of the County. This sys-
tern will require upgrading as there is increased
demand in certain areas of the County. A County sewer

49'

system is not presently available; however, the County
is looking at alternatives and will be considering
what is the most appropriate approach for the County
to take as it relates to providing sewage treatment.
Currently the private system serving the Sneeds Ferry
area and Beach area is adequate; however, as this and
other areas of the County continue to grow, the County
will need to determine what, if anything, it should do
to provide sewage treatment facilities as it has done
with the County @iater system. At present and during
the planning period, individual systems and package
systems should be adequate; however, as the County
continues to grow and change from a rural to a more
urban county, a decision will need to be made concern-
ing the best approach to provide sewage treatment
needs in an effort to protect the local environment.

Several of the County schools are overcrowded and in
need of expansion and renovation. In 1986, a bond
referendum was turned down which will make e@cpansion
and renovation difficult. Several of the major roads
leading into the Jacksonville area are in need of
upgrading to handle anticipated traffic volume, and
hopefully some of the improvements will be made during
the 10-year planning period.
As the County continues to grow, there will be a need
to provide additional and improved beach and water-
front access opportunities, as discussed on page 63 of
this plan.
Sanitary landfill and trash disposal are provided by
the County. The sanitary landfill at Pony Farm Road
consists of 150 acres now in use, with an additional
175 acres for future expansion. Fourteen container
sites are provided in higher-density areas for trash
disposal. The County currently contracts for the
removal of the containers for disposal at the land-
fill.

The County Sheriff's Department consists of the
Sheriff, 58 deputies, and 33 office personnel. The
department has 48 vehicles in use, with replacement of
vehicles at the rate of 12 cars per year.
Onslow County is presently served by 20 volunteer fire
departments, which range in size from 21 to 44
volunteers. The County presently has 8 rescue squads
which are Jacksonville, Hawsrun, Nine Mile, Richlands,
Swansboro, Sneeds Ferry, West Onslow Beach & Holly
Ridge. The following table provides a summary of
total personnel and equipment available for the fire
department.

--- Equipment--- Crash Truck/
Personnel Pumpers Tankers Utility Truck

20 Sites 596 44 24 18

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I POLICY STATEMENTS
I

A. RESOURCE PROTECTION

1. Areas of Environmental Concern

Issue: Protection of onslow County Areas of Environmental
Concern (AECs)

Onslow County recognizes the primary concern of the
Coastal Management program is to provide a means for plan-
ning sound economic growth that is sensitive to the need
to protect natural resources. County officials share this
concern for the protection and sound management of these
environmentally sensitive lands and waters. As listed in
the 1981 Land Use Plan, Onslow County had the following
Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs):

a. Coastal Wetlands
b. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines
c. Public Trust Areas
d. Ocean Hazard Areas

Since the 1981 Land Use Plan was prepared, the Coastal
Resources Commission has designated Permuda Island as an
AEC because of archeological sites on the island. The
designation wa's official as of November 16, 1984.

In terms of developing policies,.the Estuarine System
AECs, which include Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters,
Estuarine Shorelines, and Public Trust Areas-, will be
treated as one uniform grouping since they are so closely
interrelated. Another reason for grouping these AECs
together is the fact that the effective use of maps to
detail exact on-ground location of a particular area some-
times poses serious limitations.

Onslow County's overall policy and management objective
for the Estuarine System is "to give the highest priority
to their protection and perpetuate their biological,
social, economic, and aesthetic values, and to ensure that
development occurring within these AECs is compatible with
natural characteristics so as to minimize the likelihood
of significant loss of private property and public
resources." (15 NCAC 7H. 0203) In accordance with this
overall objective, Onslow County will permit those land
uses which conform to the general use standards of the
North Carolina Administrative code (15 NCAC 7H) for devel-
opment within the Estuarine System. Generally, only those
uses which are water dependent will be permitted. Specif-
ically, each use permitted in the Estuarine System is
discussed below.

a. Coastal Wetlands (see definition on page 31)

The first priority of uses of land in this area will
be uses which promote "conservation" of this sensitive

area, with conservation meaning the lack of imposition
of irreversible damage to the wetlands. Generally,
uses which require water access and uses such as util-
ity easements, fishing piers, and docks may be
allowed, but must adhere to use standards of the
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA: 15NCAC 7H).

b. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines (see defini-
tion on page 33)

Onslow County officials are very much aware that pro-
tection of the estuarine waters and adjacent estuarine
shorelines is of paramount importance to fishing, both
commercially and for recreation. Onslow County recog-
nizes that certain actions within the estuarine shore-
line, which is defined as the area extending 75 feet
landward of the mean high water line of the estuarine
waters, could possibly have a substantial effect upon
the quality of these waters.

In order to promote the quality of the estuarine
waters, Onslow County officials will permit only those
uses which are compatible with both the estuarine
shorelines and which protect the values of the
estuarine system. Residential, recreational, and
commercial uses may be permitted within the estuarine
shoreline, provided that:

(1) A significant chance of pollution occurring from
the development does not exist;

(2) Development does not have a significant adverse
impact on estuarine resources;

(3) Development does not significantly interfere with
existing public rights or access to, or use of,
navigable waters or public resources.

c. Public Trust Areas (see definition on page 34)

Onslow County recognizes that the public has certain
established rights to certain land and water areas,
and that these public areas also support valuable
commercial and aesthetic value. Onslow County will
continue to promote the conservation and management of
public trust areas. Appropriate uses include those
which protect public rights for navigation and recrea-
tion. Projects which would directly or indirectly
block or impair existing navigation channels, increase
shoreline erosion, deposit spoils below mean high
tide, cause adverse water circulation patterns, vio-
late water quality standards, or cause degradation of
shellfish waters shall generally not be allowed.
Allowable uses shall be those which do not cause

detriment to the physical or biological functions of
public trust areas. Such uses as navigational chan-
nels, drainage ditches, bulkheads to prevent erosion,
piers or docks, and bridges may be permitted.
d. Archaeological Sites - Permuda Island (see definition
on page 37)

The Coastal Resources Commission, based on the recom-
mendation of Division of Archives & History, has
designated Permuda Island as a significant coastal
archaeological resource area of environmental concern
on November 16, 1984. Permuda Island is a former
barrier island located within Stump Sound in south-
western Onslow County. The island is 1.2 miles long
and .1 - .25 mile wide. Archaeological evidence indi-
cates earliest occuEation from the Middle Woodland
Period (300 B.C. - 00 A.D.) through the late Woodland
Period (800 A.D. - 1650 A.D.) and historic occupations
predating the Revolutionary War. Archaeological
remains on the island consist of discrete shell heaps,
broad and thick layers of shell midden, prehistoric
refuse pits and postholes, as well as numerous ceramic
vessel fragments and well-preserved animal bone
remains. The resources offer extensive research
opportunities. Only those uses permitted under
applicable local, state, and federal regulations will
be permitted. Subsequent to completion of the first
draft of the LUP Update, the State is considering the
purchase of this island from the Nature Conservency to
protect the island.

e. Ocean Hazard Areas

The primary causes of the hazards peculiar to the
Atlantic shoreline are the constant forces exerted by
waves, winds, and currents upon the unstable sands
that form the shore. Durinq storms, these forces are
intensified and can cause significant changes in the
bordering landforms and to structures located on them.
Hazard area property is in the ownership of a large
number of,private individuals, as well as several
public agencies, and is used by a vast number of visi-
tors to the coast. Ocean hazard areas are critical,
therefore, because of both the severity of the hazards
and the intensity of interest in the areas.

The location and.form of the various hazard area land-
forms, in particular the beaches, dunes, and inlets,
are in a permanent state of flux, responding to
meteorologically-induced changes in the wave climate.
For this reason, the appropriate location of struc-
tures on or near these landforms must be reviewed
carefully in order to avoid their loss or damage. As
a whole, the same flexible nature of these landforms
which presents hazards to development situation
immediately on them offers protection to the land,
water, and structures located landward of them. The

value of each landform lies in the particular role it
plays in affording protection to life and property.
Overall, however, the energy dissipation and sand
storage capacities of the landforms are most essential
for the maintenance of the landforms' protective func-
tion. Ocean hazard areas for Onslow County are shown
on the official zoning map for the beach area and is
available at the County Planning Office. Only those
uses permitted under applicable local, state, and
federal regulations will be permitted in a designated
Ocean Hazard Area.

2. Hazardous and Fragile Land Areas

a. Freshwater Swamps

Onslow County supports the CAMA program and the U. S.
Corps of Engineers 404 program which has jurisdiction
on regulating development in designated freshwater
swamp areas. The County will encourage landowners to
establish or maintain vegetative buffers around sensi-
tive wetlands and water bodies.

b. Marshes

Development in marsh areas is regulated by the local
and State CARA Permit Officers in addition to Corps of
Engineers regulations. Onslow County policy is to
continue support of these regulations in an effort to
protect this sensitive natural environment.

c. Maritime Forests

Maritime forests are one of the most ecologically
important components of the barrier island system.
The County zoning map presently reflects conservation
zones which, in some cases, include maritime forests,
and these areas are being reviewed by the planning
staff and Planning Board as part of the development
review process, and this policy will continue.

d. Cultural & Historic Resources

Onslow County, through the Planning Board and Planning
Staff, provides notification to Archives & History
when a new subdivision is being reviewed to allow them
the opportunity to comment on any adverse impact on
archaeological sites. This is done in an effort to
utilize the expertise of State staff in reviewing the
impact of development on any known historic resources.
This review procedure will continue to be County
policy in the foreseeable future.

53a

e. Man-Made Hazards

The Ellis Airport represents a potential man-made
hazard area because of the potential of an air crash.
.In the unlikely event one should occur, it will be
County policy to deal with such an event through use
of the County Disaster Relief Plan.

f. Hurricane & Flood Evacuation Needs

An entire section within the Policy Statement discus-
sions is included separately for hurricane and flood
evacuation, as well as storm mitigation and post-storm
redevelopment policies, beginning on page 69.

g. Protection of Potable Water Supply

As discussed in an earlier section, Onslow County has
an extensive water system serving properties along
over 600 miles of road front. This system has a total
of 9 wells in operation, all of which are located west
of Jacksonville. Land uses near groundwater sources
are regulated by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management through N.C.A.C., Subchapter
2L and Subchapter 2C. Onslow County recognizes the
importance of protecting potable water supplies and,
therefore, supports the eftforcement of these regula-
tions.

h. Use of Package Treatment Plants for Sewage Treatment
Disposal

Package treatment plants are used rather extensively
throughout the County. These facilities are regulated
through the Division of Environmental Management
guidelines. The County will continue to support the
use of package treatment plants and enforcement of
appropriate regulations in issuing permits for their
use in an effort to protect water quality in adjacent
waters.

i. Storm Water Runoff from Agriculture, Residential
Development, Phosphate or Peat Mining

Through County support of the Division of Environment-
al Management, County officials support efforts to
regulate storm water runoff through applicable State
and Federal regulations. The County also requires
drainage plans as part of the development review
process; limited impervious surfaces is required and
reviewed for compliance within CRC regulated areas.

j. Marina and Floating Rome Development

The development of marinas has significant commercial
and recreational potential in Onslow County. There-
fore, the County supports the development of marinas,
in compliance with applicable CAMA regulations.
Floating home development has not taken place in
Onslow County, and because of potential damage to
water quality, the County will not encourage floating
home development.

k. Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas

Onslow County officials will continue to support
applicable State and Federal regulations as they
relate to the siting of new industry, or impact of new
industry on environmentally sensitive areas. The
County will encourage onlymater-dependent industries
adjacent to water bodies.

1. Development of Sound and Estuarine System Islands

Onslow County would prefer lower intensity development
in these areas if permitted by CAMA, Corps of Engi-
neers, and zoning regulations. A density of 3-4 units
per acre would be permitted only if all local, state,
and federal regulations are met and a minimum of
impervious surfaces are used.

B RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT

1. Productive Agricultural Lands (Executive Order #96)

As discussed earlier, the County's draft detail soil
survey does not address or identify the most produc-
tive agricultural lands in the County. At present,
Onslow County has no zoning regulations to assist in
conserving agricultural lands, and the law of supply
and demand is used in the private sector to establish
the highest and best use for existing agricultural
land. As in the 1981 Plan, the County's policy will
be to encourage and support where possible farm pro-
grams which will keep productive agricultural land in
cultivation. The County will encourage the continued
availability of the farmer's market as an outlet for
locally produced agricultural products. The County
will support as feasible the extension service efforts
in working with federal procurement authorities at
Camp Lejeune to purchase more local agricultural
products for use on the Base.

2. Commercial Forest Lands

Commercial forest lands comprise over three-fourths of
the.land areas of the County. Specifically, Onslow
County consists of 488,070 acres of land area with
342,703 acres in forest land. This natural and renew-
able resource is important to the County because of
jobs provided through forest products, the aesthetic
quality, natural habitat, and improved air quality
provided through the abundance of forested areas.

The County's policy has been and will continue to be
support of this natural resource through in-kind
services to agencies directly involved with the main-
tenance and support of this resource. Specifically,
the County will continue to support the Extension
Service, Soil Conservation Service and N. C. Forest
Service in their efforts to encourage good forest
management. The County encourages the Agricultural
Association's efforts to provide farmers financial
incentives to.leave forested buffer areas between
productive agricultural areas and estuarine waters.
The County will also continue to support CAMA and
Federal Wetland Programs in an effort to protect
fragile areas adjacent to timber lands.

3. Existing and Potential Mineral Production Areas

Onslow County presently has one large mining operation
at Belgrade. This 136-acre site has been and will
probably continue to be in operation for an extended
period. Also, potential deposits of peat exist in
several areas of the County and this could be a future
source of energy. . I

The County will encourage the use of natural resources
if mining operations meet all State and Federal laws
and create no adverse impact on the environment. The
County will continue to support the enforcement of
State mining regulations.

4. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries, Including
Nursing and Habitat Areas

The fishing industry, both commercial and recreational
fishing, has been and continues to be an important
part of Onslow County's economy. The County will
continue to support recreational fishing by encour-
aging the expansion of tourism and vacation develop-
ment. The County will encourage and support state and
federal programs that work toward protection of
nursery and fish habitat areas. The County will also
support efforts to secure Economic Development Grants
to develop a fish processing facility'in the County.

5. off-Road Vehicles

Protection of sand dunes and beach property is a high
priority for Onslow County officials. The County
presently regulates off-road vehicles at West Onslow
Beach year-round; however, from May 15 to September
10, no vehicles are allowed on the beach strand other
than emergency vehicles. Four-wheel drive vehicles
are allowed on the beach strand during other periods,
and these regulations will continue to be enforced by
the County. Off-road vehicle regulations for public
forests and other public lands are regulated by agen-
cies other than the County.

6. Residential and Commercial Land Development

Onslow County has been and continu*es to grow in popu-
lation. Current and future policy will be to allow
the market place to establish the need for and loca-
tion of future residential and commercial development.
Current and future development must meet all estab-
lished subdivision regulations, health department
regulations, zoning, where applicable, and all State

or Federal agencies. The County Planning Board is
currently studying expansion of the areas covered
under zoning controls which, if expanded, will provide
an additional means to guide future residential, com-
mercial, and industrial development.

7. Peat and Phosphate Mining

At present, there areno known phosphate deposits in
Onslow County large enough to justify mining. How-
ever, peat bogs do exist in the County, but due to
current energy costs, peat mining does not appear to
be economically feasible on a commercial scale.
Onslow County officials will address these two issues
and establish policy if and when activity in one or
both of these areas appears feasible.

C. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

1. Types and Locations of Industry

one of the primary concerns of local officials and
Onslow County citizens is the need for diversifica-
tion of the County's economic base. Providing job
opportunities to keep existing citizens here and to
attract new business and industry is a top priority
for the County. As discussed in the 1981 Plan, the
County will continue to encourage industrial develop
ment that is sensitive to the environment and that
will provide job opportunities for current and future
citizens. Traditional manufacturing, tourism, com-
mercial activities, and small businesses will be
encouraged to expand and to in-migrate to Onslow
County. A 1984 report by the Regional Development
Institute of East Carolina University notes an eco-
nomic benefit to Worth Carolina from affluent retiree
in-migration. Onslow County will continue to provide
a welcome environment for retirement development.

Policy: It shall be the policy of Onslow County
officials to support and encourage efforts to secure
traditional manufacturing industry that is sensitive
to the environment, encourage the promotion of more
tourism, to encourage new commercial and small
business activity, and to support local and in-
migration retirement oportunities.

Implementation:

(1) County officials will work with DOT and
other state officials to encourage the devel-
opment of a connection from Onslow County to
1-40 which will support industrial and tour-
ism development. Also, a connector of 258 to
NC 70 will be supported.

(2) County officials will continue to encourage
new industry to locate in the County and the
County will actively work with communities
that have water and sewer facilities to
assist in developing industrial sites that
can be served by water and sewer.

(3) County otficials will support efforts to
develop more tourism, commercial and small
business activity, and retirement opportuni-
ties.

(4) County officials will support efforts to
develop a civic center in Onslow County or
Jacksonville as an additional incentive to
encourage tourism.
(5) County officials will support efforts to
p@epare promotional and statistical informa-
tion on Onslow County designed to assist
economic growth efforts and to publicize
historic and other points of interest.

(6) County officials will encourage a study to
consider the possible expansion of the County
museum to include all phases of Onslow
County,history such as the Marine Corps base,
Sneads Ferry, New River, White Oak River,
Swansboro, and historic points of interest.

2. Local Commitment to Provide Services to Development

At present, Onslow County provides water service to pro-
perty adjacent to over 600 miles of the County's road
system. Central sewage treatment and collection is not
presently available; however, the County is studying the
feasibility of providinq such a system. At West Onslow
Beach, a sewage collection and treatment system is avail-
able to serve this section of the County. The County
also has several private sewage treatment facilities
throughout the County that are working well and meet all
State requirements. There appears to be a need for sew-
age collection and treatment facilities in developing
areas such as Sneads Perry and other rapidly qrowing
areas to reduce the water quality problems being exper-
ienced from septic tank seepage into estuarine waters as
discussed in the 1981 Land Use Plan. The County has
designated areas adjacent to water bodies as transition
areas on the Land Classification Map to reflect antici-
pc@ted growth and to permit plans for the possible exten-
sion of a sewer system into these areas to reduce the use
of septic tanks and thereby protect water quality. The
County will continue to provide services such as trash
removal, police protection, and fire protection and
rescue squad through local volunteer fire departments and
rescue squads.
Polic@E: The County will continue to provide water ser-
vice to county residents and will continue the process of
studying the County government's role in providing sewage
treatment facilities for rapidly growing areas of the
County. The County will secure federal or state grants,
when feasible, to help carry out this policy.

Implementation: 1!@11

(1) Continue to improve or expand the County
water system as feasible to meet the water
requ irements of County citizens.

(2) Study and consider the feasibility of
providing a sewage treatment and collection
system for rapidly growing areas of the
County or possibly several smaller systems to
serve County needs.

3. Types of Urban Growth Patterns Desired and Redevelopment
of Developed Areas

As discussed in the 1981 Land Use Plan, County citizens
desired, at that time, moderate growth that would occur
in an orderly manner, while preserving the existing
character of rural areas. County officials feel that it
would be in the County's best interest to encourage urban
growth in areas already served by urban services or that
could be served by urban services, such as water and
sewer line extension. County officials also desire to
assist those older developed areas that need redevelop-
ment and that would qualify for State or Federal finan-
cial assistance.

Policy: County policy shall be to encourage urban devel-
opment in or near Jacksonville, Richland, Swansboro,
Holly Ridge, or West Onslow Beach and other growth areas,
and specifically in areas that are or could be served by
urban services, such as water and sewer. The County will
continue to provide assistance where financially feasible
to redevelop older developed areas through State or
Federal programs.

Implementation:

(1) Establish potential rapid growth areas of the
County and consider the desirability of
zoning these areas to provide a means to
direct urban growth. Also, establish future
sewer areas, using information provided by
current sewer study.

(2) Continue to work to secure financial assis-
tance to redevelop older developed areas that
qualify for State and Federal financial
assistance.

(3) Review current and potential growth patterns
around Ellis Airport and implement Federal
Aviation Administration regulations on height
and zoning restrictions to protect from
inappropriate development of this economic
asset of Onslow County.

(4) Review and update current mobile home park
requirements now being used by the County.

(5) Study of the possible use of a setback
ordinance to establish a minimumdistance
back from highway roadways in lieu of zoning
for predominantly rural areas of the County.

4. Commitment to State and Federal Programs Including Ero-
sion Control, Public Access, Highway Improvements, Port
Facilities, Dredging, Military Facilities

The County is committed to erosion control programs
through support of the State Sedimentation Control Act.
Public beach access has been and continues to be of great
importance to local officials as demonstrated by the -
numerous public access points along the West Onslow Beach
area and one access point to the sound and Intercoastal
Waterway with other sites yet undeveloped.

Highway improvements are considered a major factor in
ensuring the continued economic growth of the area. In
1986, the County Commissioners prepared and submitted to
the Department of Transportation a report outlining
requested improvements for major and minor thoroughfares
in the County. The County also addressed the need for a
bypass for US 17 around Jacksonville to eliminate the
heavy through traffic that is presently and will most
likely continue to be experienced along this major
thoroughfare.

Large port facilities do not presently exist in the
County, and any policy pertaining to any proposed
facility would be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The County has and will continue to support efforts to
dredge areas along the Intercoastal Waterway and the
other major bodies of water to provide safe access for
commercial and recreational boating.

The County considers Camp Lejeune a good neighbor and
major economic resource for the County by providing
numerous job opportunities for County citizens and the
support of local business by military personnel stationed
at Camp Lejeune. The County has and will continue to
support the continuation of Camp Lejeune in Onslow
County.

Policy: county officials will continue to support State
and Federal programs that will benefit the County and
County citizens.

Implementation:

(1) Onslow County will continue to support
erosion control regulations as required by
the State Sedimentation Control Act.

(2) Onslow County will continue efforts to
provide and improve public access to the
beach area and estuarine waters.

(3) Onslow County will continue efforts to secure
DOT funds to improve the County's major and
minor thoroughfares.

(4) Port facilities will be considered and policy
established as need requires.

(5) The County will seek funds and support
efforts to dredge existing waterways as
needed to ensure the continued safe use by
commercial and recreational users.

5. Assistance to Channel Maintenance and Beach Nourishment
Projects, Including Provision of Borrow and Spoil Areas
and Provision of Easements for Work

Channel maintenance of areas, such as the New River
Inlet, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Bogue Inlet, and
White Oak River, is very important to Onslow County
because of the positive impact on commercial and recrea-
tional boating. Continued maintenance of these waterways
is a high priority for County officials. Beach nourish-
ment is not presently a problem, but if beach nourishment
is needed, the County will assist in such effort by
requesting State and Federal financial assistance.

Tolicy: County officials will continue to work with the
Army Corps of Engineers and any other State and Federal
agencies to ensure continued dredging and maintenance of
channels and rivers as needed to keep these facilities
open to navigation. Providing borrow or spoil areas and
provision of easements for work will be determined on a
case-by-case basis. The County would encourage-spoil
material being placed on those areas where easements for
such use already exist.

Implementation:

(1) Maintain contact with congressional repre-.
sentatives and Federal officials as dredging
or other channel maintenance operations are
needed.

(2) County officials will continue to assist
local users of these facilities as feasible,
and as needs and concerns for dredging or
maintenance are brought before local offi-
cials or as local officials determine that a
need for such assistance exists.

(3) County officials will consider requesting
state and Federal assistance for beach
nourishment if a request for such operations
is made by County citizens or if County offi-
cials determine that a need for such assis-
tance exists.

6. Energy Facility Siting and Development

At present, Onslow County is not aware of any plans to
construct an energy facility in the County. County poli-
cy to deal with such a facility will be formulated if
such as facility is proposed, and with the knowledge that
such a facility would come under existing state and fed-
eral regulations prior to being located in the County.

7. Tourism and Beach and Waterfront Access

Tourism is a major economic benefit for Onslow County
business and the Onslow County tax base. Providing pub-
lic access to beaches and other waterfront access is a
major goal and high priority for County officials as
.reflected in the three existing beach parks and one boat
ramp at the beach already in existence, and three yet
undeveloped park sites at the northern end of West Onslow
Beach. Also, the County is working with Jacksonville,
state and federal agencies to construct a waterfront park
near the USO club in Jacksonville.

Continued efforts to provide more and first quality pub-
lic beach and waterfront access should ensure the con-
tinued expansion of tourism in the County.

Policy: County officials will continue to work to expand
and improve beach and waterfront access for public use.

Implementation:

(1) Continue to apply for any State or Federal
funds that are available for the purchase,
development or improvement of new or existing
public access sites.

(2) Continue to look for other areas that might
be available for access to beach or estuarine
waters.

8. Coastal and Estuarine Water Beach Access

As discussed above, providing estuarine water and beach
access for public use is a high priority for County offi-
cial.s. Therefore, it shall be County policy to make
every effort to provide boating and pedestrian access to
the County's estuarine and beach areas.

9. Anticipated Residential Developmentr Densities,
Locations, Units Per Acre and Services Necessary to
Support Development

Onslow County officials anticipate residential develop-
ment to c'ontinue in the West Onslow Beach,, Sneads Ferry,
Southwest Onslow just south of Jacksonville, the Piney
Green Road area, the Gum Branch Road area and the
Swansboro and Queens Creek area. Much of this current
and anticipated development directly relates to ease of
access to either the Jacksonville and Camp Lejeune gates,
the sounds and Intercoastal Waterway or the beach front.
Densities and units per acre are presently determined by
the County Zoning Ordinance for West Onslow Beach and by
Subdivision Regulation Standards for Septic Tanks in the
remaining portion of the County. The County presently
provides water service to all current and anticipated
growth areas. Public sewage treatment facilities are
currently not available; however, the County is in the
process of undertaking a study to determine the feasibil-
ity of providing a sewage system throughout the County.
Also, a large private system at West Onslow Beach and
Sneads Ferry is in operation with plans for expans'lon.

Services such as fire protection, roads improvements, and
schools are monitored by the County to ensure that these
facilities are providing the best possible service that
is financially feasible to serve the needs of existing
and anticipated development.

Policy: County officials will continue to encourage
residential development to serve the housing needs of
existing and future residents of Onslow County. Pro-
viding adequate community facilities to serve residential
development will continue to be a high priority for
County officials.

(1) The County will conduct a study to determine
the feasibility of providing a public sewage
treatment facility to serve the needs of
County growth areas.

(2) The County will consider zoning in rapidly
growing areas to provide guidance in the
location and density of future development.

(3) The County will continue to work to provide
recreational opportunities in all recreation-
al districts.

(4) Continue to support rural fire departments
and rescue squads.

(5) Continue extension and upgrading of County
water system.

(6) Continue to upgrade school facilities as
feasible.

(7) Continue to upgrade collector street system.

10. Beach Area Development Policy

11
See,,map and policy statement on next page.

on low on IM
no onlow'soy JWeve"Ont PI" 5eACH AMMA
Onslow County's beach development policy will be to DEVC-LOPMff-NT IDC>LICY
encourage higher density development on the Atlantic
Ocean side of the beach road in areas that are either ONSLOW 15FEACH
vacant or in higher density development already. The
e xisting lower intensity residential pattern areas at
the southern end of the beach will be encouraged to
remain in a lower intensity use.

Lower density development will be encouraged on the
Sound side of the beach road in an effort to protect
adjacent waters in this more environmentally sensiti
area by encouraging low-density development in th' area
rather than higher density development. Provid access LEGEND
to the oc eanfront is the primary objective of e Onslow
County beach development policy. LCIWEM INTENSITY
KF-551DENTLAL PA-TTF_KN

LoweR a>eN51ITY
sc:)UND 15IDr=
The County has recently adopted an amendment to the 115)(15T. UNDEVELOPED
zoning ordinance that will help prevent overcrowding
of taller buildings on the beach front. Specifically, M4115T. HIGHER OI=-N51T`r
the zoning ordinance now requires that additional side
yard be Provided as building height increases.

MU!5T E@45- MOREE @5MN11517JVM
To THF-- MWViKc:>NMF_NT.
ReVISr-SP RMUDCATION
OF 5R. )5G5

0 _1rlE=R/5r--:WM
RCIA05 AVAILIAE304@
4,

DeMAND-1-5 F(:>K CX--M-AN FFR
ACC:r=55 FOR, KPS%Dr--t-4TIAL.

11. _Supporting the Efforts of the Local KEEP AMERICA
BEAUTIFUL SYSTEM - The ONSLOW CLEAN COUNTY COMMITTEE

The goal of the Onslow Clean County Committee is two-
fold: (1) achieve a sustained reduction in litter, and
(2) preserve and protect our natural resources. The
"Committee" is a locally owned and operated non-profit
organization financially supported by the County and
functioning under the guidelines set down by the nation-
al resource, Keep America Beautiful, Inc. The Committee
itself is composed of 25 dedicated citizen volunteers
whose activities are supported by three staff members:
the Executive Coordinator and two litter control
wardens. Through the combined efforts of the staff and
the citizens' committee, four components underlie all
basic actions to ensure that the desires of the County
are carried out:

A unified, enforceable sanitation code/ordinance will
be enacted
0Public education workshops specifically geared to
in,volve each segment of the County in the program
0upgraded solid waste collection procedures and tech-
nology
Fair and consistent ordinance enforcement

County officials are aware that a clean community
projects a positive image for industry, new business,
and visitors to the area and will continue to support-
the efforts of the Clean County Committee. Comple-
menting and supporting the primary goal of reducing
litter/preserving-protecting natural resources, the Com-
mittee will address other community issues to include,
but not be limited to, those listed below:

Implementation

(1) The Committee will work with schools,
business/industry, civic clubs, governments,
and the media to provide comprehensive
involvement of the community in the Keep
America Beautiful System4

.(2) The Committee will continue to work toward
establishing alternatives to landfilling,
such as recycling programs, waste-to-energy
programs, and reusing programs among both
private and public sectors.

(3) The Committee and staff will continue to
provide upkeep of West Onslow Beach by pro-
viding pedestrian litter receptacles, regula-
tory signs concerning the beach, and litter

ordinances. Routine maintenance will also be
accomplished for receptacles and signs.

(4) The Committee and staff will continue to
@enforce dune/beach regulations on West Onslow
Beach.

(5) The Committee and staff will continue to
monitor the County container sites and assist
the Solid Waste Department to provide clean,
safe, and adequate disposal sites for County
residents.

(6) The Committee and staff will continue to
serve as an agency to utilize DWI Community
@ervice workers to perform various tasks for
improvement of the County.

12. Mobile Home Ordinance

In August 1980, the Neuse River Council of Governments
prepared a study of the existing conditions and trends of
mobile homes in Onslow County at that time. In 1980,
there were 212 mobile home parks containing nearly 2,900
units. Also, at that time, the average park contained
about 15 units. In 1986, there are between 450 and 500
mobile home parks, ranging in size from five mobile homes
to 600 mobile homes, with many parks being concentrated
in the southwest Onslow and Swansboro Township areas.
Based on a windshield study conducted by the Onslow
County planning staff of the Snead's Ferry area, they
found that this one portion of the County contained over
370 individual sited mobile homes and over 400 mobile
homes in parks. This continuing growth in mobile homes
and the current lack of regulations to guide mobile home
development, other than minimal state water and sewer
regulations as administered by the County Health Depart-
ment, have the potential for-complete overdevelopment of
the County in mobile homes. Because mobile homes provide
affordable housing resources for-County citizens, County
officials do not wish to restrict their use. However,
because of the rapid growth in the use of mobile home
parks, County officials feel that they need to be better
regulated.

Policy and Implementation:

County officials will instruct the Planning Director and
Planning Board to draft a mobile home ordinance for
review and adoption. County policy wil be to work toward
the adoption of a mobile home park ordinance.

The County will incorporate into a mobile home ordinance
guidelines on road construction, utilities, and landscape
buffering.

D. STORM HAZARD MITIGATION

1. Hazard Map

The County has in place a Hurricane Damage Assessment and
Reconstruction Plan which has been incorporated into this
Land Use Plan. As part of the Land Use Plan update
process we have identified from the existing Land Use Map
and Flood Insurance Boundary Map approximately 907 struc-
tures of varying value that are within the 100-year flood
area. This figure does not include the beach area because
flood insurance maps in this area were not correct when
received by the County and are presently being revised.
However, based on the existing land use survey it appears
that less than 200 mobile homes and less than 50 conven-
tional cottages would be below the final designated 100-
year flood level. This observation is made based on the
fact that many of the newer structures at the northern end
of the beach and many at the southern end of the beach are
built on pilings at 12.5 feet above mean sea level, as
recommended by local inspectors as part of the Emergency
Flood Insurance Program.

2. Existing Land Uses and Structures in Hazard Area

The Flood Boundary Map shows that approximately 907 struc-
tures are located in the 100-Year Flood Area. Many of
these are along the upper reaches of the New River, South-
west Creek and Queen Creek. (See Map #3, Composite
Hazards Map.)

3. Monetary Value of Structures in Hazard Area

Approximately 907 Structures @ $35,000* $31,745,000
Mainland

Beach
Approximately 200 Trailers @ $10,000 2,000,000

Beach
Approximately 50 Conventional Beach
Cottages 4 $50,000 2,500,000

Estimated Value of Structures Subject
to Storm Damage by Flooding $36,245,000

*Source: Typical replacement value from Tax Office

4. Hazard Mitigation Policy

It shall be the policy of Onslow County to enforce the
Federal Flood Insurance requirements by setting finished
floor elevations of new construction above the 100-year
flood level to protect future development from flood
damage as much as possible. In the event of storm damage,
reconstruction would be permitted if the new construction
meets all local, state, and federal regulations.

ONSLOW COUNTY
It HURRICANE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
AND RECONSTRUCTION PLAN

MARCHr 1984

prepared at the Direction of

Onslow County Office of Emergency Management
It and

Onslow County Board of Commissioners

he preparation of this document was financed in part through a
rant from the North Carolina Office of Coastal Management through
provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972,.as
amended, which is administered by the Office of'Coastal Zone
anagement, National oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

HENRY VON OESEN AND ASSOCIATES, rNC.
Consulting Engineers & Planners
611 Princess Street ** P. 0. Drawer 2087
Wi.1mington, North Carolina 28402

ONSLOW COUNTY HURRICANE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

RECORD OF CHANGES 72

1. PURPOSE 73

21. AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

311. ORGANIZATION . . . . . . . . . . 74

4v. CONCEPT OF OPERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

5. RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75

61. INSTRUCTIONS FOR DAMAGE ASSESSMENT . . . . . . 79

711. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION TASK FORCE

ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

8111. APPROVAL 83

Attachment 1 - Organizational Chart, Damage
Assessment Teams

Attachment 2 - Personnel Rosters and Vehicle
Assignments, Damage Assessment
Teams

Attachment 3 - Personnel Roster, Reconstruction
Task Force

Attachment 4 - Sample Damage Assessment Worksheet
and Instructions

Attachment 5 Damage Assessment Report

ONSLOW COUNTY

HURRICANE DAMAGE ASS ESSMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION PLAN

RECORD OF CHANGES

CHANGE NUMBER DATE OF CHANGE DATE ENTERED CHANGE MADE BY
(SIGNATURE)

ONSLOW COUNTY

HURRICANE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION PLAN

I. PURPOSE

This plan sets forth the authority, organization, concept,
assigns.responsibilities and provides instructions for'the conduct

of damage assessment and reconstruction operations by means of

on-the-scene surveys following a hurricane disaster in Onslow

County. For definition of damage assessmentp see Paragraph VI.A.

The information obtained during the survey is essential in

assessing the extent of damage. within the County and is required

when requesting State and Federal assistance. This plan will be

used for assessing damage caused by a hurricane. However, it also

may be used to access damages caused by other types of disasters

such as a flash flood, tornado, winter storm (northeaster), etc.

II. AUTHORITIES

A. Public Law 93-288

B. NC General Statutes Chapter 166A

C. Civil Preparedness ordinances and Agreements

(1) Jacksonville-Onslow County Civil Preparedness
It. Resolution.
(2) Jacksonvil.le-Onslow County Disaster Operations Plan

(3) Jacksonville-On slow County-American National Red

Cross.Agreement.

(4) County of Onslow State of Emergency Ordinance, as

amended.

III. ORGANIZATION

A"* Damage Assessment 92erations. The organization for damage

assessment operations will be as shown in Appendix I

Organization Chart to this Plan. Personnel Rosters and

Vehicle Assigments are shown in Appendix 2.

B. Reconstruction Task Force. The organization of the

Reconstruction Task Force. will be as shown in Appendix 3.

IV. CONCEPT OF OPERATION

A. Pre-Disaster. County Emergency Operating Center (EOC)

personnel and Damage Assessment Section (DAS) will

maintain equipment and supplies (maps, forms, city

directories, photo records of structurest tax value

information, etc.) in readiness condition. The Damage

Assessment Section (DAS) will be provided damage

assessment training, at least anually. The Reconstruction

Task Force (RTF) will meet to discuss procedure

coordination at least anually.

B. During the Disaster. DAS and RTF personnel will remain in

shelters, listen to the radio, and prepare to respond to-a

telephone call, commercial radio and television or other

message to report for duty.

C. Post-Disaster. As soon as safety conditions permit, DAS

and RTF personnel when notified will report to the County

EOC, receive assignments and pick up equipment and

supplies, move to- emergency or disaster area in vehicles

equipped with two-way radios, survey assigned areas,

record damage, transmit general damage assessment

information via radio or other means to EOC, r eturn to EOC

when directed, and provide specific written report to EOC.

Damage assessment. will. continue until all suspect areas

are covered even though Federal or State assistance has

arrived. The Reconstruction Task Force will meet to

recommend the declaration of a moritorium on repairs and

new development (if necessary) in accord with the County

of Onslow State of Emergency ordinance, as amended. Also,

the RTF will oversee the reconstruction process and advise

the County Commissioners on any policy questions which may

arise. The RTF will work closely with the State and

Federal representatives on the Interagency Regional Hazard

Mitigation team and the Section 406*Hazard Mitigation

Survey and Planning teams.

V. RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Emergency Management Coordinator (EMC)

(1) Ensure that equipment and supplies (damage asses sment

planning maps, photo records of all existing

structures, property evaluation and insurance data,

damage assessment forms, city directories, etc. ) are

readily available in the EOC. Schedule damage

assessment training for the DASA and provide for the

instruction at least anually and no later than March

of each year. Update this plan annually.

(2) Notify the County Damage Assessment Of f icer that an

emergency or disaster is imminent or has occured and

arrange to assist him in notifying the Survey Teams

and Recovery Task Force members via telephone,

commercial radio and TV or other means. Provide

situation briefing in EOC and in coordination with

the Damage Assessment Officer dispatch teams as

needed to affected areas. Remain in the EOC and

receive damage reports from the Damage Assessment

Officer, analyze same and advise heads of local

governments of situation. Provide consolidated

damage assessment data to the State Emergency

Management at the State EOC in Raleigh; or to the

State Emergency Response Team (SERT) at its Field

Command Post if it is operational.

(3) Retain reports for use in future to support disaster

impact data (see Paragraph VI A (9) below).

B. Damage Asses'sment Officer (DAO)

(1) Assist the County EMC in maintaining DAS readiness to

include this plan, equipment and supplies, and

training. Update damage assessment planning maps,

photo records of all existing structures and property

evaluation and insurance data to include information

available in the Onslow County Tax office and from

local insurance firms. Update personnel rosters and

vehicle assignments.

(2) Upon notification of an emergency or disaster, report

to the EOC and notify Survey Teams. In coordination

with the EMC, dispatch appropriate teams to the

affected area. Remain in the EOC and receive damage

data from the teams, review for accuracy, record and

plot in formation, access values to damages, and

advise EMC of the situation. Contact local American

Red Cross Chapter for damage assessment data.

Prepare consolidated damage assessment data in

prescribed format for transmittal by the EMC to State

Division of Emergency Management. (See Appendix 5 of

the Plan).

C. Damage Assessment Teams _(PATs)

(1) Assist DOA and EMC in maintaining readiness by

checking equipment and supplies, attending training

sessions and reporting any changes to personnel

rosters.

(2) Upon official notification, report to the EOC as soon

as safety conditions permit, receive assignments,

pick up equipment and supplies, move in vehicles

equipped with two-way radios to the emergency or

disaster area assigned, survey area, record damage,

transmit general damage assessment information via

radio to EOC, return to EOC when directed and provide

specific written reports to Damag e Assessment

Of f icer.

D. Reconstruction Task Force (RTF)

(1) Review the nature of damages, identify and evaluate.

alternate approaches for repairs and reconstruction,

and formulate recommendations for handling community

recovery.

(2) Recommend to the County Commissioners the declaration

of a moratorium on repairs and new development.

(3) Set a calendar of milestones for reconstruction

tasks.

(4) Initiate orders for repairs to critical utilities

and facilities.

(5) Recommend the lifting of a moratorium for "minor"

repairs.

(6) Recommend the lifting of a moratorium for "major"

repairs to conforming-structures.

(7) Evaluate hazards and the effectiveness of mitigation

policies and recommend the amendment of policiesr if
necessary..

(8) Initiate negotiations for relocations and

acquisitions of property.

(9) Recommend the lifting of moratorium on "major"

repairs (with approved changes to conform).

(10) Participate in federal hazard mitigation planning.

(11) Recommend the lifting of moratorium on new

development.

'7 Q

VI. INSTRUCTIONS FOR DAMAGE ASSESSMENT

A. Def init ion. Damage assessment is a rapid means of

determining a realistic estimate of the amount of damage

caused by a hurricane (or other emergency or disaster).

For the pqrpose of this plan, it is expressed in terms of
NJ -numbers of structures, type of damage (destroyed, major
damage, minor damage, habitable or uninhabitable),

estimated total dollar loss, estimated total dollar loss

covered by insurance, and information describing the

impact of the disaster. Disaster impact information may

include but is not limited to the following:

(1) Number homes inacessible (due to loss or roads,

bridges, presence of overwash fans, or for other

reasons).

(2) Number of people displaced and in need of housing.

(3) Number of substandard homes damaged or destroyed.

(4) Unemployment estimates, businesses affected and

estimated length of problem.

(5) Needs for food, clothing, and medicine.

(6) Needs of elderly.

(7) Minority problems.

(8) Economic conditions o f community no rmal or

depressed.

(9) History of past disasters.

(10) Debris problems.

(11) Emergency protective measures taken by government.

-7 A

(12) Resources available to meet the needs of people.

(13) Resources needed and unavailable in terms o f type,

quantity and duration.

B. Re2orts

(1) To State. Damage Assessment Reports will be

submitted by the County government for the entire

County and will consolidate municipal and County

data. Reports will be submitted to the State

Director, NC Division of Emergency Management and a

copy provided to the Area Coordinator as soon as

possible, generally within 24 hours, but no later

than 48 hours following the occurence. The reports

will be in the format prescribed in the Onslow

County Disaster Relipf ?_nQ Assistance Plan, and as

shown in Appendix 5 of this Plan.

(2) To County. Survey team reports will be completed by

Team Captains in accordance with the procedure shown

below, reported as rapidly as practicable using best

available means of communication, and confirmed with

a completed form when the team returns to the EOC.

C. Team Procedure. Form EM-39 (Percentage of Value Method)

will be used by the teams (or team members) who will

estimate the extent of damage sustained expressed as a

percentage of the total value of the structure (See

Appendix 4). Determination of estimated dollar loss will

be calculated by the Damage Assessment Officer using best

available property value listings and other information.

(1) Survey area assigned perferably by on-site visit.

(Note: If not possible, obtain data by other meanss

e.q., telephone or other personal contacts).

(2) Complete the Damage Assessment Worksheet (Form EM-39

Percentage of Value Method), a copy of which is

shown in Appendix 4, in accordance with the Damage

Assessment Worksheet Instructions.

(3) Transmit general damage assessment information via

radio or other means to the EOC. Provide followup

written reports of general damage to the Damage

Assessment Officer.

D. Section Procedure. Damage Assessment Officer will:

(1) Review all team worksheets for ac curacy.

(2) Consolidate all team,worksheets.

(3) Using the Damage Assessment Planning Map, photo

files, and Property Evaluation and Insurance Data on

file, complete that portion of the worksheets

entitled "For Use By Damage Assessment Officer" in

accordance with instruction contained in the reverse

of each worksheet.

(4) Using the above data, complete Section A of the

County Damage Assessment Report in accordance with

instructions contained in Appendix 5.

(5) Obtain "Private Property - Agricultural" data from

the County USDA Emergency Board and enter in Part B

of the report.

(6) Complete Section C - Economic Impact and Section D -

Public Property in accordance with Appendix 5.

(7) Pass report to EMC and retain one copy for files.

VII. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES

A. Task Force Procedures

(1) Based on preliminary damage assessment reports?

recommend the declaration of a moratorium on repairs

and all new development by County Commission,

(2) Prepare a calendar of milestones for reconstruction

and set priorities for repairs to roads, water and

sewer systems, telephone and electrical power line/

facilities, waterways, beach dunes, public

structures, etc.

(3) Initiate orders for repair of infrastructure based

on establishment priorities.

(4) Initiate special reconstruction permitting

procedures using the resources of the existing

County Building Inspector's office.

(5) Meet on site to (a) establish the new CAMA setback

line for all beachfront construction, (b) establish

the locations of roads, utilities, etc., (c) mediate

decisions regarding relocation of structures away

from hazard areas, and (d) negotiate the acquisition

of land for public use.

(6) Recommend specific further mitigation of hazards

based on presently unknown conditions extant

following the storm.

(7) Recommend the gradual lifting of moratoria as

reconstruction progresses.

(8) Conduct a post reconstruction meeting to review the

disaster experience and to modify the role of the

Task Force as needed.

(9) Revise the Hurricane Damage Assessment and

Reconstruction Plan as required to meet future

needs.

(10) Prepare a final disaster recovery report following

the reconstruction period.

VIII. APPROVAL

Emergency Management CoordinatoF- Damage Assessment Officer

APPENDICIES

Organizational Chart, Damage Assessment Teams

2. Personnel Rosters and Vehicle Assignments, Damage Assessment

Teams

3. Personnel Roster, Reconstruction Task Force

4. Sample Damage"Assessment worksheet and Instructions

so Damage Assessment Report

Mr
Op or.

APPENDIX 1

ORGANIZATION CHART

Onslow County Damage Assessment Section WAS)

County
Emergency Management
Coordinator

County Assistant
Damage Assessment Reoorders
officer
00
Ch

Public Property siness and Industry Private Dweliing ivate Dwellings
Survey rDeam FSUU rvey Team Survey TL=&n No. fl, Esrurvey Team No. 2

- volunteer Firemen - Tax Collector (C) - FmHA Representative - Building
Inspector (C)

- Public T%brks Engineer - Building Inspector - Vol. Firemen (D)

- Building Inspector - Realtor - Realtor - Realtor (D)

- Architect/Civil - Arcitect/Civil - Architect/Civil - Architect/Civil
Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer

C = Team Captain
D = Driver

NOTE: The orginzation shown above is designed to show the various sources of personnel which may be available
1 1 31

for survey teams. Onslow County should specify the composition of the teams.

APPENDIX 3

PERSONNEL ROSTER OF RECONSTRUCTION TASK FORCE

Telephone
Title Name Office Home

A. County Personnel

1. Chairman? Onslow County Board of
Commissioners (Team Leader)
2. Onslow County Emergency Management
Coordinator
3. Damage Assessment Officer
(County Auditor)
4. County Sanitarian
00 5. County Sheriff
6. County Building Inspector

B. Private Sector Personnel

1. Realtor
2. Civil Engineer
3. Architect
4. Banker

C. Designated Representatives From
4.
Foll',owing PublicAgencies or
Private Cor]2orations

1. Onslow/Jones County Electrical
Membership Corporation
2. Carolina Telephone Company
3. NC Department of Transportati'on
4. NC Division of Environmental
Management
5. NC Office of Coastal Management
6. US Army Corps of Engineers
7. Farmers Home Administration

9/30/81

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT INSTRUCTIONS

Reports will be made by county governments and State Departments
and will cover damages within the entire county including municipalities.

The Damage Assessment Report will be submitted following a signi.fi-
cant emergency or disaster. Assessments are required in numerical and
dollar value terms. They must be made by qualified personnel and should
be the best estimates that can be made in the immediate post-emergency/
disaster period. Numbers and dollar values are totals for the county.
in completing Sections A and B below the following definitions will
apply:
DESTROYED - More than 80% of value to repair; unusable, uninhabitable.'

MAJOR DAMAGE More than 30% of value of a structure; uninhabitable.

MINOR DAMAGE 30 % or less of the value of a structure; uninhabitable.

HABITABLE - Damage amounting to 15% of less of value of structure;
usable for intended purpose.

UNINHABITABLE Unusable for intended purpose.

TOTAL DOLLAR LOSS Repair/replace4ent cost at current prices; restore
to pre-disaster conditions (present standards).

INSURANCE COVERAGE Average insurance coverage by type of property
expressed in percentage of total property value.*

N/A - Not Applicable.

Section A - Private Property - nonagriculture - includes all dwellings,
businesses (large and small commercial concerns) and privately owned
utilities in urban, suburban and rural areas except properties of individuals
principally engaged in agriculture.

Section 8 - Private Property agriculture - reports damages to
agricultural property including dwellings of farmers. Care should be taken
to ensure that damaged dwellings are reported in only one Section.

'Appendix 7

9/30/311

Section C - Economic Impact - includes information necessary to
estimate the amount of individual,:assistance which,will be needed in
categories such as temporary housing, food stamps, unemployment compensationg
individual and family grants, and Small Business Administration Loans.

Section C, Economic Impact is completed as follows:

1. Business Losses - List information requested based on conversation with
owners or managers of damaged businesses.
2. Losses by Income Level:
a. From Section A, determine total dollar loss for all types of property.
b. From Section B, determine total-,dollar loss for all types of property.
c. Add a and. b above to obtain grand total dollar loss.
d. On the basis of the Damage Assessment Officer's knowledge of the
prices of the damaged/destroyed property, divide C (grand total dollar
loss) into three parts; that which could be attributed to low, middle,
and high income families. For example, if 2/3 of the dollar value of
private property damage was sustained by low income families/individuals,
then 2/3of the total dollar loss would fall under the "Dollar Loss" columi
in the "Low" (Income) row. Divide the remaining 1/3 appropriately between
middle and high income groups, using the same procedure. Enter these
figures under the "Dollar Losses" column.
e. Based on the Damage Assessment Officer's knowledge of the damage connuni-
ties, estimate the average insurance coverage in the high, middle and
low income groups and enter these figures under the average % insurance
coverage column.
f. Compute the uninsured losses for the three income levels by multiplying
the dollar loss figures for each income group times the appropriate %*
insurance coverage and subtract the result from the appropriate income
level dollar loss figure. Enter the resul 't under the Uninsured Losses
column in the appropriate Income Level Row.
3. Effects on Transportation - Give a verbal and/or numerical description of
the effects of the disaster on public and private transportation.
4. Effects upon farm employment. From the County ASCS Emergency Board, obtain
an estimate of the number of farm and migrant workers who are affected by
the disaster.

9/30/81;

Section 0 - Public Property - includes all properties and fdcilities
ownded by legal governmental entitites within the county including publicly
owned utility systems. It also includes damages to private nonprofit
educational, utility, emergency medical and custodial care facilities which
have'an effectiveruTing letter from the Internal Revenue Service granting
tax exemption.

All sections are required for a complete Damage Assessment Report. Where
any of the three categories of property (private, agricultural, public)
received no damages, it should be noted as 11none-11

Normally, one complete Damage Assessment Report will be submitted and will
be shown as report number one. Changes or additions can be made by submitting
revised reports which will be reports number two, three, etc.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I LAND CLASSIFICATION
I

III. LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

The land classification system provides a uniform way of
looking at how the planned use of land interacts with environmen-
tally sensitive areas and with the development of a County. It is
not a strict regulatory device in the sense of a zoning ordinance
or zoning map. It represents more of a tool to understand
relationships between various land use categories and how these
relationships help shape local policy. Particular attention is
focused on how intensely land is utilized and the level of
services required to support that intensity. Land classification
is also useful in the staging of services necessary to support
development. The regulations for the Coastal Area Management Act
state:

"The land classification system provides a framework to be
used by local governments to identify the future use of all
lands. The designation of land classes allows the local
government to illustrate their policy statements as to where
and to what density they want growth to occur, and where they
want to conserve natural and cultural resources by guiding
growth." (7B.0204) (b)

There are five general land use classifications under CAMA:
Developed; Transition; Community; Rural; and Conservation. In
applying the land classification system, each local government
gives careful consideration to how, where and when certain types
of, and intensity of "development," will be either encouraged or
discouraged. A brief summary of the five broad classifications,
as contained in the CAMA rules, might illustrate this. For
example:

"Urban land uses and higher intensity uses which presently
require the traditional urban services should be directed to
lands classified developed. Areas developing or anticipated
to develop at urban densities which will eventually require
urban services should be directed to lands classified transi-
tion. Low density development in settlements which will not
require sewer services should be directed to areas classified
as community. Agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction and
other similar low intensity uses and very low density, dis-
persed residential uses should be directed to lands classi-
fied rural. Generally, public or private water or sewer
systems will not be provided in areas classified rural as an
incentive for intense development." (7B.0204) (c)

The purpose of the conservation class is to "provide for the
effective long-term management and protection of significant,
limited, or irreplaceable areas." Consequently, urban services
(whether public or private) should not be provided to those areas
as an incentive to "stimulate" more intense development. Each of
these classes must be represented on a Land Classification Map.

The five land classifications and Land Classification Map are
therefore intended to serve as a visual reflection of the policies
previously stated in earlier sections of this plan. Ideally, the
map which depicts these classifications should be as flexible as
the policies that guide them. Also, the areas shown as conserva-
tion includes AEC's, wetlands, floodways with ultimate determina-
tion of their location on the ground being made by the appropriate
regulatory staff or County permit officer. (See Map 2, Land
Classification Map)
are: The five land use classifications, used in the CAMA program

A. DEVELOPED

The developed class of land use provides for continued inten-
sive development and redevelopment of existing cities or
municipalities. Areas to be classified as "developed"
include lands currently developed for urban purposes or
approaching a density of 500 dwellings per square mile that
are provided with usual municipal or public services, police
and fire protection. In other words, such areas must cur-
rently be "urban" in character, i.e. have mixed land uses
such as residential, commercial, industrial and institution-
al, or other uses at high to medium densities.

B. TRANSITION

Transition land is classified as those lands providing for
future intensive urban development within the ensuing ten
years on lands that are most suitable and that will be sched-
uled for provision of necessary public utilities and ser-
vices. They may also provide for additional growth when
additional lands in the developed class are not available or
when they are severely limited for development.

Lands classified "transition" may include:

0 lands currently having urban services;
0 lands necessary to accommodate the population and econo-
mic growth anticipated within the planning jurisdiction
over the next five to ten years;
areas which are in, or will be in, a "transition" state
of development, i.e. going from a lower intensity to a
higher intensity, of uses and will eventually require
urban services.

Transition lands must further:

be served or be readily served by public water, sewer,
and other urban services including public streets, and
0 be generally free of severe physical limitations for
urban development.

The "transition" class should not include:.

0 lands of high potential for agriculture, forestry, or
mineral extraction, or land falling within extensive
rural areas being managed commercially for these uses,
when other lands are available;
0 lands where urban development might result in major or
irreversible damage to important environmental, scienti-
fic, or scenic values, or;
0 land where urban development might result in damage to
natural systems or processes of more than local concern;
and
0 lands where development will result in undue risk to life
or property from natural hazards or existing land uses.

C. COMMUNITY

The "Community" classification provides for clustered land
uses to meet housing, shopping, employment, and public
service needs within the rural areas of the County. It is
usually characterized by a small grouping of mixed land uses
which are suitable and appropriate for small clusters of
rural development not requiring municipal sewer service.

D. RURAL

The "Rural" class provides for agriculture and forest manage-
ment, mineral extraction and other low intensity uses on
large sites including residences where urban services are not
required and where natural resources will not be unduly
impaired. These are lands identified as appropriate loca-
tions for resource management and allied uses; land with high
potential for agriculture, forestry or mineral extraction;
lands with one or more limitations that would make develop-
ment costly and hazardous; and land containing irreplaceable,
limited, or significant natural, recreational or scenic
resources not otherwise classified.

E. CONSERVATION

The final land use category, according to CAMA guidelines, is
the "Conservation" class, which provides for effective long-
term management of significant, limited, or irreplaceable
resources, specifically, and at minimum, all of the statutor-
ily defined AECs. However, beyond the presence of AECs,
other areas within the County, because of natural, cultural,
recreational, productive, or scenic value, may also require
similar "effective long-term management." Examples could
include major wetlands (other than statutorily defined coast-
al wetlands); essentially undeveloped shorelines that are
unique, fragile, or hazardous for development; lands that
provide necessary habitat conditions (especially for remnant
species); pocosins; or publicly owned water supply watersheds
and acquifers.

The designation "Conservationn should not be misconstrued to
imply "non-use," but does imply a need for careful and
cautious management of any allowable use. For example, with-
in a "conservation" area, there may be high ground areas
which are suitable for "development," in which case develop-
ment should be allowed to take place under carefully managed
conditions. The term "preservation," on the other hand,
implies total restriction on all uses. Within lands desig-
nated Conservation, each proposal, or application for any
"developed" use should be reviewed on a case by case basis.

Since, as stated previously, "Conservation" does not imply
"Preservation," specific allowable uses in the Conservation
class shall include:

1. Drainage: Adequate drainage is essential to the economic
vitality of Onslow County; therefore, drainage facilities
over and through these areas, but not with the intent of
draining the Conservation areas for "developed" purposes,
will be allowed. Such facilities may include diking,
tiling, and piping systems.

2. Low density residential development if and as approved by
the County Health Department and local, state, and
federal regulations. However, water and/or sewer ser-
vices will not be extended to such a residential area
merely to stimulate additional growth and development.
On-site sewer services will be required and must be
feasible.

3. Water-oriented uses such as piers, docks, and marinas, if
they are shown not to cause detriment to the estuarine
waters or the Conservation lands.

4. Necessary utility service lines, such as water, sewer,
electrical, natural gas, etc., may be transmitted through
areas classed as conservation. These lines would have a
destination outside of areas classed conservation and
would serve only areas outside the conservation class and
would not act as a stimulus to development within the
conservation class. These transmission lines shall not
violate the environmental integrity of the conservation
class, and if permitted, must meet all applicable
federal, state, and local regulations.

5. Roadways, when construction of roadways can be conducted
without significantly altering the ecological system, and
in compliance with existing federal, state, and local
regulations.

6. Timber harvesting with approved management practices.

7. Barge landings.

8. Marinas (upon careful determination that substantial
pollution will not occur) and as permitted by local,
state, and federal regulations.

In conjunction with the Policy Statements section of this
Plan, each application for a "developed" use in the
Conservation classification shall be brought before the
County Planning Board and reviewed on a case-by-case basis
prior'to approval. The County Planning Board may recommend
modification of the proposal and may require engineer's
reports to show that no adverse impact on the environment
will be caused by the proposed development.

The County has chosen to use two types of transition on the
land classification map in lieu of the current point system that
has been established since completion of the 1981 plan to change a
land classification designation from rural to transition to permit
development. The higher density transition includes those areas
experiencing rapid growth with the lower density transition,
including those areas that are in a state of transition from a
lower intensity of use to a higher intensity of use.

Higher Density Transition - This transition classification as
reflected on the land classification map includes those areas of
the County that are experiencing rapid growth, are served by
County water, streets and other services, including some package
treatment plants and areas that may be the first priority areas to
be served by sewer. Areas in this classification and as shown on
the land classification map, include the West Onslow Beach Area
and Sneads Ferry area which is now or soon will be served by a
private sewer system. The Southwest Onslow area and Gum Branch
Road and Highway #258 Corridor is also a rapidly growing area in
transition. The US #17 North of Jacksonville and the Piney Green
Road area is also becoming a higher density area with rapid growth
because of the access to Camp Lejuene and Jacksonville. Finally,
the Queen Creek and other land areas West of Swansboro and on each
side of NC #24 are considered Higher-Density Transition Areas.
The boundary of these transition areas may be amended based on
County decisions or future location of sewer lines.

Lower Density Transition - The lower density transition
includes the remaining portion of the County not designated Higher
Density Transition, Developed, Rural, or Conservation, and that is
or will be in a "transition" state of development, i.e., going
from a lower intensity to a higher intensity of use and may even-
tually require urban services in addition to existing County water
services or where the County may wish to extend urban services.
As shown on the land classification map, the lower density transi-
tion is located primarily north of N.C. 24 and east of U.S. 17.
Other areas include the area southwest of Richlands along 258 and
N.C. 24, and along highway and road corridors in the southern
portion of the County not designated rural, conservation, or
transition on the land classification map.

The Developed Classification for Onslow County includes the
four municipalities of Jacksonville, Swansboro, Holly Ridge and
Richland.

The Rural Classification includes those areas in the County
being used primarily for agriculture or forestry operations with
little or no development anticipated during the planning period.
As shown on the land classification map, this includes areas along
the southern edge of the White Oak River and not designated "Con-
servation." The land area south of Hofmann Forest and not desig-
nated, higher or lower transition or conservation. All of the
land area along the southern and western edge of the County not
shown as conservation or lower and higher transition is included
in the rural class.

The Conservation Classification includes the 100 year flood
boundary as defined by the Federal Flood Insurance Program and
applicable building height requirements, Public Trust Waters,
Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines, ocean hazard areas and
the archaeological site of Permuda Island. As noted on the Land
Classification Map, conservation areas are shown for general use
only and final determination of location shall be made by the
responsible federal, state or local agency having regulatory
authority. Such determination shall be made based on a field
investigation of any area in question.

Relationship of Policies and Land Classification

As discussed in the data collection analysis section of the
Land Use Plan,'Onslow County is in a transition from what has been
a rural county to a more urban county. Many of the recent devel-
opments for housing and commercial use have been concentrating in
areas such as southwest Onslow, the Piney Green Road area, the Gum
branch Road area, along 258, and between U.S. 17 and the Intra-
coastal Waterway near Chadwick and Snead's Ferry. Also, the
Queen's Creek area has been experiencing considerable residential
development in recent years, and all of these areas will most
likely continue to grow in population.

As also discussed in earlier sections of the plan, the County
presently provides a County-wide water system throughout the area,
along with fire protection, streets, garbage collection, and other
urban-type services, with the exception of sewer service. How-
ever, as was mentioned earlier, there are several package treat-
ment facilities throughout the County providing sewage treatment.

The County's primary policy is to permit expansion of the
local economy, while being sensitive to the local natural
resources. The County is also concerned that individuals be given
a free choice as to location of housing and shopping, as long as
it does not adversely impact on the environment and meets all
current local, state, and federal regulations. For this reason,
the County has chosen to identify five land classifications, those
being: Higher Density Transition, Lower Density Transition, Devel-
oped, Rural, and Conservation. The conservation areas include the
coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, estuarine shorelines, public
trust waters, Permuda Island, and the 100-year flood boundary and
Ocean Hazard Areas. The four municipalities of Jacksonville,
Swansboro, Richland, and Holly Ridge are all considered developed
for purposes of the County's Land Use Plan.

The higher density transition, as discussed in the Land Clas-
s*ification section, is represented by those rapidly growing areas
identified on the existing land use map, which include a portion
of the Swansboro Township area on each side of N.C. 24, the
Snead's Ferry/Chadwick area between U.S. 17 and the Intracoastal
Waterway, southwest Onslow, the area along 258 and along Gum
Branch Road, areas adjacent to U.S. 17 north of Jacksonville, and
the area adjacent to the Piney Green Road area, as shown on the
land classification map. The lower density transition areas
include all those portions of the County not included as a con-
servation,'developed, or higher density transition ar-eas or rural
areas. Rural areas are those areas under agricultural production
or forest production.

In summary, the primary policy of County officials is to give
County citizens the opportunity to locate businesses and residen-
tial uses throughout the County as is currently taking place, with

the understanding that all future development must meet all appli-
cable local, state, or federal regulations, and the land classifi-
cation map and this policy reflects that primary goal.

It shall be the policy of Onslow County to enforce the Federal
Flood Insurance requirements by setting finished floor elevations
of new construction above the 100-year flood level to protect
future development from flood damage as much as possible. In the
event of storm damage, reconstruction would be permitted if the
new construction meets all local, state, and federal regulations.

Intergovernmental Coordination and Implementation

During the data collection and analysis process, Talbert,
Cox & Associates contacted Richland, Swansboro, and Holly Ridge to
collect information that would impact on Onslow County. Specific-
ally, we collected information on the extent, availability, and
adequacy of water and sewer systems in those municipalities.
Onslow County and the four municipalities have had and continue to
have'working sessions on a monthly basis to discuss joint concerns
and problems, such as water systems, landfill, animal control,
emergency preparedness, and emergency rescue services. This
intergovernmental coordination will continue in the future.

Public Participation

Beginning in November 1985, the Onslow County Planning Board
has had the 1986 Land Use Plan Update on the agenda. Specific-
ally, the Land Use Plan has been on the agenda between November
1985 and May 1986 for open discussion during any of these Planning
Board meetings. In addition to this, the Planning Board has sent
50 notifications to persons on the Planning Board's mailing list
one week before each meeting. Also, each meeting has been covered
by two to four members of the media. In addition to the regular
Planning Board meetings, there have been several open work ses-
sions of the Planning Board to discuss policies and other portions
of the Land Use Plan document. Specific Planning Board meetings
with the Land Use Plan on the agenda include:

November 7, 1985
December 5, 1985
January 9, 1986
January 27, 1986 (Public Information Meeting)

February 6, 1986
March 6, 1986
April 3, 1986
May 1, 1986 (Draft Handout)

June 19, 1986 (Public Information Meeting - Review of
Draft Plan)
October 9, 1986 (Planning Board Work Session)
February 2, 1987 (County Commissioners Work Session)
February 16, 1987 (Public Hearing)

During the initial public information meeting, a citizen sug-
gested that the Planning Board consider an annual review of the
Land Use Plan Update. After discussion by the Pi@anning Board and
Planning Director, it was determined that this would be one way to
review the implementation of policy statements and would provide a
means of annual review and update of the Land Use Plan document.
Therefore, it will be the policy of the Planning Board and County
Commissioners to conduct an annual review of the Coastal Area
Management Land Use Plan for Onslow County.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
ONSLOW COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
ONSLOW COUNTY CAMA LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
MONDAY JANUARY 27,1986 7:00 P.M.
COMMISSIONER'S ROOM, SUMMERSILL BUILDING
The Onslow County Planning Board will conduct a
public Information meeting for the purpose of
soliciting suggestions an issues to be considered in
the planning process. The CAMA Land Use Plarr is a
basic planning tool which will influence future growth
and development of the County. All interested per-
sons should plan to attend. For further information
contact the Onslow County Planning Department at
465-3661.
January 20, 1986.

PUBLIC$
Fill
I - I
On June 19th, 1986 at 7:30
p.m. in the Commissioner's
Room of the E.W. Summer-
sill Building, the onslow
County Planning Board will
hear a presentation of the
Preliminary Draft of the
1986 Land Use Plan Update.
The public Is cordially in-
vited to attend.

B SENBLE
commm Y
rumic access. to west onsiow: mow mucn ana: wnere
JO
.P
210' Y PSAIL ISLAND ONSLOW COUNTY
Left end of this map extended below,',.-".,
4
0
IFFIRE IATID 3@
nAns" Also -
tv,
_Q;. TIDAL RIMS

Z
0',
77
3011400 ft. 3
OB
&Bloaw this we IF= km.
LANTIC OCEAN*
to at,
IL

W-, SOUND
UMP, -711ACDASTAL
01641,

ruAL. AT
"A
@Permada Island
D

7 L

4&
+ T EAN:'
A ANTIC CC

m6 Pa@i
beac "'.4..@i This facility differi fri)m others shown hem In that ft is intended for
A look. at access,,!,
to the sound Side of Topsail Island, rather than for ac'
Symbols on the P? wh C A!i although the ocean is close by for those family groups III,,
or vxr u
Interest The. site' Is maintained by the N,C. Wild e
is now plan for West Onslow Beach on Topsail Island. Commission, rather than by Onslow County.
7, C.
Thr MaN cover all of Topsail within Onslow, County, from New Rim
right to the PeDder CDtmty line at lower ieft.
4
coommodate 210-311 vehicles with trailers. A wide concrete ramp is dir
The puking area, which measum approximately IM by A.00 feet,
map., ft Teouhra..- 'a
=development Is not indicated because the ban
a sturdy
ds'Z 116b, Vib.Wb=8%:T;'ff=._@ @gp wooden pler, such that two boats can be launched a OVE
4* aw MdOy available at the right scale, dates from an earlier era. New I, " I . a , " " 11 W . .,
development In progress extends war most of the right third of the beach
al
dimw am AW 1. The left two-thirds of beach shown an Map U aim is -and provides immediate access to deep water leading to the
it The slip Is directly under the oceajf end of the N.C. 210 e
w given Wct Lind'
.00B
dbveloped, mostly with older structures. A stretch of about five miles of
@;u @i y and other sound waters.,
Insa Waterwa
-_boa& between these two developed am, remamsessentiallymideveloped,.
arspusely 10
@@Providhog -fool
1.1c
`Pai*k Sites A, BT
It"W m A
-Public access at, cominissioners., po@*roagly@,advocated
'@access witbparking'spaqe it., law slteek@,Neir@ ''in n0W- These three as yet undeveloped oceanfront sites recently were earinaf
v for use as combined-public parking and beach access facURIM or pw
on r f-beach parks. 1109 ofthe land at sM-A-and all-of a a sites B .ar(
without P43 Map* saw--0
S, to Onslow County by Marlow Bostlr,@pmwemmt.
R be donated t
*I �a
Ther =0 arrows give an approxima develoWofthe property.
te Indication of ft miniber and
............... c's contributions be're were made partly In connectio, th
location of Me smallest existing ea5ements, or pedestrian rights of way, to
Bostl
theoireantront from the closest public thoroughfart paralleling the beach.
T ent reached with the state by which he was grurted pe jor
agreem
M are,
ATUMP used extensively by beach resident&, few of these acces
of -111% value ta the general public because of very limited parking space rp) ate the beach road inland, as noted In the lower left corner of Map 1.
.-available for public use. Most are an easements no wider than 10 feet. They site A, with ocean frontage measuring GOD feet, nds in] nd 'u'
feet to Mason Creek. The site, when developed by =.ty, B. ded'
..wom provided by developers primarily for the use of owners of The site occupies 400 feet of beach front. It extends inland to include the
non-watterfront property to the rear of the same developments. . sound side of N.C. 2iO, Its rear boundary being the shore of Muddy Creek, provide both ocean access and boating access to sound waters. rk
ft past yeam Ouslow CDtmty has Improved about 20 of these accesses by about ON feet back from the ocean frout. lot wLU have space for 570 vehicles. 4
Site B will have 46 parking spaces, while 51te-C will have It Sites A
coostructing narrow elevated ramps of salt-treated lumber, facilitating Parking space, provided on both sides of the highway, will accommodate 3when developed, are to have public convenience facilities similar
tbafflirover the dunes and greatly reducing damage to them. a total of about 165 cars. The surface of the two lots is of crushed rock. I
An attractive elevated wooden pavilion similar to that provided at Beach those now provided at Beach Park I or 2.
Park No. 1. but larger, houses lavatories for men, women and the Of interest is the fact that these three facilities we] give th bit
capped mbined total of about 1,000 feet of choice oce; ybe
fc access bandl It also offers a large sheltered observation decL Showers, a co P
Publ rip to the upper access along a stretch of coast that, from the N.C J111
*iWng fountain and pay phone am provided. as Is a rar . I measures 3.8 miles. This 1,00) feet of public access Is about three tir
level for handicapped persons. Again, an elevated wooden walkway gives
h parkina @at required by county zoning regulations at the'iate of one 10-foot acc
access ever the dum to the beach.
Negotiations are to progress almea st,entarging the fad* through every 600 leeL
That Alto muW by the widest arrows; an'examples of the second acquisition of addItImW adjoining property.
alternatim as explained in the shaded box, in which. public parking and
Jbiescitsma are combined.
Beach.Park No. 3 (3 Other forms of accessN
7
1810121 Park No. I
Access 3. traditionally a popular place for surf Wing, was donated tatb.@ to beaches.in Onslbw.
county for public use by developers Marlow Basile and Roger Page. With a
..%ft dk desWW Ondow County Public Beach Park No. 1, was ft Beai@h RCC63 in the county Is by Do means limited to that shoft
700-toot front facing New River Inlet, the property extends Wand au. abov M 7b W erries and other rvin tberwLs
fird! off semrat popertles om to the county by Rose Hill developer average of about 200 feet to Rive Road. Space for parking of about 40 cars emA a f facilities se g o-
:Marldia,K Basile. With Its facilities constructed mW maintained by the Is available an a sand surface, about a third of which is firm enough for Hammock Beach on Bear lsltaZ te up to 375 visitors dafl)
.,Ixiurdy@- the park. was opened for public on In May 1984. The parking K twowheddrive traffle. the height of the three-month with some would-be visit
:.surfacetwithcrusbed rock, can accommodate about 65 vehicles. Operators of four-wheel-drive vehicles with the proper having to be turned away on peak days. An average Of 2D.
county pernalts 0" p
UbwO parking is actually 400 feet Wand frons the oce-frout, the lot is can drive *A on the str&W here and then proceed to wherever they may tbe Wand each summer via the state-opaRted ferries.
the beach by a walkway that Includes an elevated WOoft wlab to go along Topsail fql,, -S WArly 20 miles Of ocean shore. "a 0 More Um half the population of Ouslow County consists of .1V
t I
s;dfogscross thedune line. numbers at people do this. except from mid-May to mid-septe-ber w1i retired military people or their dependents who are entitled to t
& *9 parking K a small but well-designed and 8111-tva P-01- on such traffic is prohibited. portion of Onslow Beach that lies inside Camp Lejeune. Many do
*Pubw lavatories for men. women and the handleapped. Alm Surf overwasli occurs hue from time to tho, during stormy weatherbit. regularly without overcrowding those beaches and withwt competing N
WmIldbi-astouldlousho-, phis a drinking fouatainand pay pbom . this is of no Immediate consequonce, since no one visits the site then, civilian demand forthe use of other beaches.
Ideration is being given to erecting a piling-supported public Finally. a growing number of condomint 4 cottages, hotels 0'
Calls a
-be cb accommodatJ to Property omne
Park No. 2 2 ence facility here, similar to that now provided at Beach Park No. properties offer on-th, a IM,
Z* - - 'Itc, ran afford le
1, provided the required permit can be obtained from the N.C. Department as to countless thousands of the general pub who
7.WW Awilifty. knowat as Onslow County Public Beach Put No. 2, Is of Natural Resources and Community Development. Discussions have been weekend orholtday vacation on the seashore. . .I I..I
largw than No. 1. and is a year newer, opened for public use going on bet. environmental authorities and county officials with a From an the above, It can be seen that, at least for the present, all tj
VD MUF MW It Is an property obtained by Onslow County partly through vitw to Possibly providing a ftmer natural surface over part of the parking Who 10" Our beautiful beaches have a wide variety of public accem fl
fiftid- ft- devekipers and property owners, and partly by purchase lot Consideration also is being given to extending the Property boundaries which to choose, and the supply Is generally adequate to me4ftr
wiftattratstate andcouruy funds. -@ . :. - - deniands. (See today's Daily News Opinion for further commentarys
by further acquisition of Ian&

m m mm @= m m
POTIMPROVEMENTS
ONSLOW

HIGHWAY PROGRAM ONSLOW COUNTY

TOTAL SCHEDULE
ROUTE/CITY I.D. NO. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION EST.COST fY-TYPE WORK-EST. COST

NC 24 R-2010 US 258 NEAR RICHLANDS TO BEULAVILLE. (10.0 MILES). WIDEN 15000 FYa9 ROW 1500
EXISTING ROADWAY TO A FOUR LANE SHOULDER SECTION. - FY90 ROW ISOO
FY91 CONST 6000
FY92 CONST 6000

US 258/NC 24 R-1021 NC III TO NC 24 WEST OF RICHLANDS. (9.3 MILES). WIDEN 7800 PRIOR YEARS 200
EXISTING ROADWAY TO MULTI-LANE FACILITY. FY86 ROW 800
FY87 CONST 6800

US 258/NC 24 R-217 SR 1251 TO NC III . (3.9 MILES). WIDEN EXISTING TWO LANE 5549 PRIOR YEARS 713
FACILITY TO FIVE LANE SECTION. FY86 CONST 4836

JACKSONVILLE U-2008 NC 24, BELL FORK ROAD TO HOLCOMB BLVD. AT MARINE BASE GATE. 1900 FY88 CONST 1900
(2.7 MILES). ADD AN ADDITIONAL LANE TO THE EXISTING
FACILITY.

JACKSONVILLE U-2107 US 17 BYPASS , US 17 SOUTH TO NC 24. (7-0 MILES). FIVE LANE 21900 FY9S ROW 1900
CURB AND GUTTER FACILITY ON NEW LOCATION. POST YEAR CONST 2000D

NC S3 6-1308 SOUTHWEST CREEK. REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 18 225 Fyaq CONST 225

NC 172 B-2060 NEW RIVER. REPLACE BRIDG E NO. 17 3600 FYa7 CONST 3600

SR 1225 B-2157 BRANCH OF NEW RIVER. REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 49 192 FY91 CONST 192

SR 1402 B-1310 NEW RIVER. REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 191 940 FY87 CONST 940

SR 1406 B-2155 LITTLE NORTHEAST CREEK. REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 121 327 FY91 CONST 327

SR 1518 B-1309 HILL CREEK. REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 182 205 FY88 CONST 205

US 17 L-2011 NEAR WESTERN BLVD. IN JACKSONVILLE. LANDSCAPING. a FY86 CONST a

NC 24 L-U12 INTERSECTION OF LEJEUNE BLVD. & NEW BRIDGE ST. (SR 1402) 3 FY86 CONST 3
IN JACKSONVILLE. LANDSCAPING.

SR 1413 Y478 NORTHEAST OF JACKSONVILLE AT CAMP-LEJEUNE 722 904M REVISE 67 FY86 CONST 67
AUTOMATIC WARNING DEVICES

us 17 W1004 US 17 FROM SR 1130 TO SR 1400s NEAR JACKSONVILLE. CONSTRUCT 173 PRIOR YEARS 93
LEFT-TURN LANES AT 7 MEDIAN CROSSOVERS, CONSTRUCT INSIDE FYBA PE &
PAVED SHOULDERSt INSTALL ADDITIONAL SIGNINGP INSTALL GUARD FY86 CONST 74
RAIL AT TWO BOX CULVERTS AND REVISE DRAINAGE ON US 17 EAST CONSTRUCTION PENDING
OF SR 1124. LENGTH 1.8 MILES.

us 17 W738 US 17 AND SR 1130, US 17 AND SR 1117. WIDEN US 17 NORTH OF 149 PRIOR YEARS 24
SR 1117 FOR DUAL LEFT. WIDEN SR 1130 AND SR 1117 FOR TWO FY86 ROW 20
LANE APPROACH. REVISE SIGNAL. FY87 CONST ID5

us 17 W767 US 17 FROM SOUTHWEST CREEK TO SOUTH OF VERONA. CONSTRUCT 797 PRIOR YEARS 53
BYPASS OF VERONA. FY87 CONST 74.4

NC S3 W749 NC 53 FROM US 258-NC24 TO SR 110S, WIDEN NC 53 FROM 20 FEET 304 PRIOR YEARS 40
TO 3S FEET FROM SR 1130 TO US 258-NC 24,OVERLAY WITH MfNIMUM FY66 ROW s
ASPHALTo AND REMARK AS A THREE LANE SECTION UTILIZING 11 FT. FY87 CONST 259
LANES WITH I FT. PAVED SHOULDERS. CONSTRUCT LEFT TURN LANES
ON NC 53 AT SR 1116a SR 1113-1212 AND OVERLAY WITH MINIMUM
ASPHALT.

SR 1117 W1020 SR 1117 FROM 100 + OR FEET NORTH OF US 17 TO NC 53 NEAR 75 PRIOR YEARS 7
JACKSONVILLE. CONSTRUCT TWO-FOOT PAVED SHOULDERS ALONG FY87 CONST 68
SR 1117 FROM US 17 TO NC 53s CONSTRUCT LEFT-TURN LANE AT
CRITICAL LOCATIONS AND OVERLAY WITH MINIMUM ASPHALT.
(1.10 MILES).

SR 1308 W1023 SR 1308 FROM 0.10 MILE SOUTHEAST OF SR 1905 NORTHWEST TO 715 PRIOR YEARS 61
SR 1322, LENGTH = 0.90 MILE. CONSTRUCT A THREE LANE SECTION FY86 ROW 180
FROM 0.10 MILE SOUTHEAST OF SR 1905 NORTHWARD TO SR 1322 FY86 CONST 474
INSTALL ADDITIONAL REGULATORY AND WARNING SIGNS AND RAISio
PAVEMENT MARKERS.

Mr.?
ot &114 ecdogrield 3
10, 2 4
Auburn Archer
, F Odle llfuc

Toddy
Sloickcre. 264 MV111 '-M LE
Ken Stantantibuo k
oil

0, 4 for" t 254
Mit fie Pink" Art.- u 13 10
I pikeyff Ip
Level u no I"
'b Hollfj 0
L
i rl I G 0
114, four Oaks 'r4f in Alston, Souls 13 1 w 23 0 1 0
+ 6 ook
olds oro 1 3
fix 11U,

An
701 -0 . J.
a 141
fit took -4
G( "t am T I ton
Duclay 'Ira C@
0
olint 01
a. Iva a F
Off .1 Sy a" it
13 Comer 10 L E 0 1
4 so It Run (U

Alba
4 Keene Mon
)Pink Hill Pleasant Hill X'
S A M S V,
15
0
gornets
r La. Y C:@
Sslornbur 421 17 1
uilia
+ N
z Elliot u he Potter
Will
Uesk RQ'4. UlBville zo
D% P L 14 E4
Chlpndl. 0

14 MAN
13 Cthinf
i. >
258
Parker we Into 5 is Hit hinqueom
No sh I CA herino Ls a 3.
ko fflffm r am
Jacksony
0 C
TtKhey 0 N d
14 Cypres E-4 ,
its Oak, LADEN 14 arrieffs 41 - I . - in 14 Cris I r-4
LAKE t Howl Z
Run 0
D',--- E TomahAw Wi
S Wh Pondarl& to Hit z 0
Win, rMs Xer W @@-4
its, as Ica
kw%
11 S Ivan Is E- CTJ
z S16.4 L I Dixon <
G-p I
bom 701 utto LL-\
Is Iki so Cr\ @4
*Sidti not V Is Fail
6 p malty kid
1.13tion 'like"MW E D E R
1110 Mly curr4 - 1 0
1 44, CAM" I a 0 0
ky Point
urt Ci
aw".A.W ampste 5WO 2.
W+ -WI At dis TovwN Beach
hiteville Lake We me I sit* New 1100sad Inlet
Pig "aymi 1%
I bom Am 01ton Fripmen Osice
warcep a ICA Inle
M 4 HANO -
Vs Majew Inlet
+ i1min 11 A 4. a
C,3

F.A&W L
B-1308 B-1309

Its?
F."

ONSLOW COUNTY C"AO-KX
.2.3 lb *Cats
POP -S

-11Q ly f
Irl
IM 1- -,%*
%P; 1 0 1153
.3.s ft
ms P IM
314
i ONSLOW COUNTY a C.@

?A 1.0 ... Ms 210
1.10 s

I '1 1329
1531
I'm

1133
.110 is

haw-
17

C 53, BRIDGE 18, ONSLOW CCUNTY
Replace Bridge over So thwest 1518. BRIDGE @4182.
-0 Co @IT
it.pl". Bridge
Creek. u 10-@i ITICIek y
-7)

2 F

ONSLOW COUNTY

JACKSONVILLE
POP. 1IL259

::R 1402, BRIDGE #191, ONSLOW COU14TY
Replace Bridge over New River.

R-217 C"Iss 14
all 5
OW Pop

V
W -b. @CKSONVI
., LLE
FW, Mab-
33! IM
.313 it's
36 13.6

3 14 .0"
I I Is
I Its 0

0 Tell to-d"
.333 1 ?is

ONSLOW COUNTY Us*
0

@Ca*.@ Lob. It"

till
till
I
on.

131
A11000 0
A*POO
It

US 258-NC 24, SR 1251 TO NC 111. ONSLOW COUNTY
Widen existing two lane facility to five lane facility.

V-j L
U-2107 010
014SLOW COUNTY

G> .011

lost
JACKsONVIUE A

VMS,

IMILARM am

JACKSONVILLE BYPASS; US 17 SOUTH TO NC 2.4, ONSLOW COUNTY .
Five lane curb and gutter facility on new location.

U-2008

on me

ONSLOW COUNTY

Corti,

JACKSONVILLE; NC 24, BELL FORK ROAD TO HOLCOMBE
BOULEVARD, ONSLOW COUNTY
Add an Additional lane to the existing facility.

(Ro- 2 0 1071
ONSLOW COUNTY

C60do

ow-

.003 13

DU! LIN COUNTY F it

0
,Sol
"Y

NC 24, US 258 NEAR RICHLANDS TO BEULAVILLE, ONSLOW-
DUPLIN COUNTIES
Widen existing roadway to a four lane shoulder section.

lift
IM4V 1310 '.P
R-1021
t..' 13OW 8"Cilt lilt
1301
i. MOM
N, 131 -32
.30"

130' 1301
@ '309 13'.
1301 13" 138*
moo"
f 413 $pptlt POP 3.592
1303 3M

10
$at.
;Ifs

NIS 9 1 lips
24

.1.9 J320

131 pool
1330 Z.: 0 TM Low.
ONSLOW COUNTY is
lisp list
1737
12.3 12" 1 C-'
% C
% 1330

US 258, NC 111 TO NC 24, ONSLOW COUNTY
Widen existing roadway to multi-lane facilfty.

1-2157

303
13" P 42
km

24 W

1311
tzv

M3 11 Ly

ONSLOW COUNTY

SR 1225. BRIDGE 049, OHSLQd COUNTY
Replace bridge over br2nch 3f
:Ie*w River.

O-ZI58

1434
Omaow C=HTY

FIN" CAEEN-WHffE OAK
fumpac) Hu
KW. 6.038

LEJEUNE .30

40 BRIDGE 0121, ONSLOW COUNTY
North
LRe lace bridge over Li.ttle east
C,

B-2060

7M, 4 Ps
84 Y

F,4dw L

STONES
MAY

to"

ONSLOW COUUNTY

C-0

NC 172,,BRIDGE #17. ONSLOW COUNTY
Replace Bridge over New River.

Graham K. Eubank
VNSLOW COUNTY
County Office Building
&ffice of the 39 Tallman Street-
110ann-ing Department Jacksonville, NC 28540
Telephone (919) 455-3661

May 13, 1986

MIORANDUM

TO: Rick G. Leary County
6 pnager
FROM: Stephen E. Davenport, Planning Director

SUBJECT: Advanced Population Estimates

NeuseRiverCOG recently provided a copy of Advanced North Carolina
County Population Estimates: July 1, 1985. A copy is attached. These are
for planning purposes only. The estimates for revenue programs will be
finished later.

The Onslow County estimate for the date is 124,987 as compared to
112,784 in the April 1980 census. The actual increase-4or the County during
the 5-year period was 12,203.. This is fifth among the 100 coun ties in actual
increase following Wake, Mecklenburg, Forsyth, and Cumberland in that order
(and only 221 behind Cumberland).

Onslow Count y was also one of 15 counties that experienced a double-digit
growth rate (10.8%) during the period. Of the 15 higher growth rate counties,
7 are coastal and 3 are mountain.

In total population Onslow County ranks as 9th behind Mecklenburg, Wake,
Guilford, Cumberland, Forsyth, Gaston, Buncombe and Durham in that order.
In the 1980 census Onslow was 10th but has now passed Davidson County by
7801,

SED:srf

Attach.

May 7, 1986

M E M 0

TO: County Planning Department

FROM: Thomas M. Combs

Enclosed is a copy of the Advanced estimates of the population of
North Carolina counties that were prepared by the Demographic Research
Unit of the Office of State Budget and Management with the aid of the
U. S. Bureau of the Census. These estimates will be used for planning
purposes only. As in previous years, the provisional estimates, which
will be released in late June, will be certified as the 1985 county
estimates and used for revenue sharing.

jdh

Enclosure

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Office of State Budget Management
Management and Information Services
April 1986

ADVANCED ESTINATES OF THE POPULATION OF NORTR CAR 1-THA COUNTIES
July 1, 1985

This report presents 'advanced estimates of the population of North Carolina
counties as of July 1, 1985. These estimates were prepared by the Demographic
Research Unit of the Office of State Budgit and Management with the aid of. the
U. S. Bureau of the Census. ' These estimates will be used for planning purposes
only. As in previous years, the provisional estimates, which will be released
in late June, will be certified as the 1985 county estimates and used for
revenue sharing.

These advanced estimates were computed by adjusting, for each county, the
1985 estimate from the Regression (Ratio-Correlation) Method, one of the two
methods used for the provisional estimates, by the.,.,AV'erage historical. deviation
(over 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1984) of the provisional estimate from the egtimate
from the Regression (Ratio-Correlation) Method.

In the Regression (Ratio-Correlation) Method, a multiple-regression
equation is used to relate changes in the distribution of a number of differen:
data series to changes in the distribution of population among counties. For
both the development of the regression equation and the computation of the
population estimates, the data for all variables are transformed by calculating
ratios of percentage shares in the later year to corresponding percentage
shares in the earlier year. These transformations cause the resulting
coefficients in the prediction equation to add approximately to 1.0. The
series of data used in the Regression method for North Carolina are Federal
income tax returns (n), school enrollment in grades 1 through 8 (X2), and
automobile registrations W). , The regression equation for North Carolina is
given by

--y --k:-0.019 + 0.296(n) + MUM) t...9-385W).

These advanced county estimates were controlled to the provisional State
estimate for North Carolina, which was produced by the U. S. Bureau of the
Census with the help of some data collected by the Demographic Research Unit.
The 1980 census populations shown for the State and counties reflect
corrections made through March 1986.

Advanced North Carolina County Population Estimates: July 1, 1985
(cont.)

County July 85 April 80 Difference
estimate (census) Number z

Johnston 76,518 70,599 5,919 8.4
Jones 9,600 9,705 -105 -1.1
Lee 40,632 36,718 3,914 10.7
Lenoir 60,211 59,819 392 0.7
Lincoln 45,386 42,372 3,014 7.1
McDowell 36,303 35,135 1,168 3.3
Macon 23,005 20,178 2,827 14.0
Madison 17,320 16,827 493 2.9
Martin 26,270 25,948 322 1.2
Mecklenburg 439,479 404,270 35,209 8.7
Mitcheli 14,570 14.428 142 1.0
Montgomery 24,014 22,469 1,545 6.9
Moore 54,615 50,505 4,110 8.1
Nash 70,969 673,153 -- 30816 5.7
New Hanover 111,492 103,471 8,021 7.8
Northampton 22,195 224 1.0
Onslov 4,987 112,784 12,203 10.8
Orange 2, 8 77,055 5,093 6.6
Pamlico 11,134 10,398 736 7.1
Pasquotank 29.232 28,"2 770 2.7
Pender -24,268 229262 2,006 9.0
Perquimans 10,516 9,486 1,030 10.9
30,276 29,164 .3.8
Person
Pitt 96,314 90,146 6,168 6.8
-Polk 14,182 12,984 1,198 9.2
Randolph 96,589 91,300 5,289 5.8
Richmond ".562 .45,481 1,081 2.4
Robeson 105,707 101,610 4,097 4.0
Rockingham 85,334 83,426 1.90a 2.3
Rowan 104,148 99,186 4,962 5.0
Rutherford 57,416 53,787 3,629 6.7
Sampson 50.311' 49,687 624 1.3
Scotland 33,616 329273 .1,343 4.2
Stanly 50.499 48,517 1,982 4.1
Stokes 35,297 33,086 2,211 6.7
Surry 61,034 59,449 1,585 2.7
Swain 10,792 10.283 509 4.9
Transylvania .25,759 23,417 2,342 10.0
Tyrrell 4.194 3.975 219 5.5
Union 78.055. 70,436 .-7.,.619 10.8
Vance 38,350 36i748 1,602 4.4
Wake 353.148 3010,429 51,71-1 17.2
Warren 16,647 16,232 415 2.6
'Washington 14.416 14,801 -385 -2.6
'Watauga 34.336 31,666 2.670 8.4
Wayne 99,203 97.054 2,149 2.2
Wilkes 60,591 58,657 1,934 3.3
Wilson 64,112 63,132 9ao 1.6
2 W.8

Yadkin 29,156 28,439 717 2.5
Yancey .15,644 14,934 710 4.8

North Carolina 6,253.951 5,830.415 373.536 6.4

On May 6, voters will choose
between eight Democratic can-
didates for county commissioner.
The three top vote-getters will face 064%r
Republican candidates in Nov-
ember. There is no Republican Sunday, APrff 27, 1986
primary. Here are the Democrats'
views on issues facing the county,
ranging from development to school
construction and county services.
!) If given the authority, what one
change or new idea would you bring
into C011* government?
David 0ement:
I would strive to provide states-
manship in the management of
public affairs. I might well achieve
this because I come with no strings
attached, with ample time, energy Commission cswdidate.
and dedication to serve the people
with honesty and integrity.
ArthurMarshaflDavfs:
No extra voting, such as the
school bond and runoff elections.
They cost the taxpayers thousands shal C7 ideas on issues
6: dollars that could be used for
schu.'--,@,eds.

would institute long-range plan-
ning and set goaj@ 2rd priorities to
achieve those plans insteaa UJL
reacting to crises (such . as our
schools funding).
Sybil Gandy:
I would have the county commis-
sioners agenda published in the
Daily @ews one week in ad'vance of
meetings in order to give the county
citizens time to react tn items %f
interest and conr,.--,- @, ty meir,
Wiffleffilrr-Phreyz:@-'.
Orcww County has
retired persons livirS in the county.
I believe mar;, of these people taxpayer. Local governments must Projects but in the past have passed
would volin,eer their services as meet fiscal demands and pressures responsibility for distributing that
cons,-I.ans, as hands-on workers or which are placed on them through money to the school board. Would
a@ supervisors if given the opportu- mandates from the state and federal you be in favor of continuing that
nity. Our county.would benefit from government as well as agencies arrangemenfor would you Uke'to
their knowledge and save tax dependent upon the local govern- see the county commissioners use
dollars from their donated time. ments; for support. more influence in the determination
The Rev. Floyd Jones: BertPonsock: of how school construction funds are
My idea would be that all Onslow The one change or new idea that I spent?
County agencies be required to would bring into county government DavidClement:
submit a deficit statement on would be more and closer liaison County commissioners have failed
spending once each year. The with other local governments in the to Provide for school construction
statements would be scrutinized by county. We could share our pro- needs, and they have entangled the
the Board of Commissioners ac- blems and work'together for better school board in a conspiracy to
Lording to its annual budget. solutions countywide. A greater deceive. the public. In'1981 and 1982,
Cecit Morton: common bond- would aid future the school board properly advised
To meet fiscal demands, counties cooperatioi. the commissioners regarding school
need the. itithority to create new 2) The county commissioners 'are construction needs, and when the
sources of revenue - in order to directly responsible. for the level of commissioners refused to provide,
relieve the burden on the property funding for school construction the school board resorted to the

responsibility for schools, should
seek opportunities to meet with the
school board, visit schools and talk
with school administrators about
school problems and plans. I believe
that is one of. the school board's
problems now - there is not enough
interaction between the school
boards and county commissioners.
Anytime we become part of an
organization we are more willing to
contribute.
WOO Humphrey:
An elected Board of Education
and the school administrition should
retain its responsibiht@, for dis-
tributing. funds for scho(,i @-.,)nstruc-
tion projects. It is necessary that
the coimty commissioners, receive
good input from the two groups to
find what is needed and practice
good fiscal management in our
county.
The Rev. Floyd Jones:
I would like to see the county
commissioners be more concerned
about the Onslow County schools'
construction projects. I would en-
courage the county commissioners
to use more influence on how school
funds are spent.
Cecil Morton.-
The local Board of Education is an
elected, board in its own right, and
that board has the responsibility for
overseeing educational programs in
our county. These elected school
board members should be in a
position to be better informed
regarding school needs than the
county commissioners are. The
county should continue to provide
funding within its capabilities; how-
Then, in some hidden way Lai7yFitzpatnck, ever, the responsibility for estab-
courts I I would like to see the county lishing priorities for construction
tne school board was seduced into . ioners use more influence should remain with the Board of
remaining silent from 1983 On, cOmmIss Education since it is familiar with
possibly on the promise of a school in the determination of how school problems and has information
bond issue to solve Oe mounting construction funds are spent by available to it to make the priority
problems. The question is not: How meeting with the Board of Educa- determinations based on need.
are school construction funds spent; tion more frequently and planning
for future needs, since the county BertPonsock:
but rather: Are the needed funds commissioners are ultimately held Bad publicity received by the
provided? school board during the recent
ArthurMarshall Davis: responsible by law and their con-@
I favor having the school board stituents for appropriating those I school bond campaign has created
decide. what needs to be done, and: funds. doubts conce-ning their ability to
then lit the county commissioners Sybil Gandy: responsibly -distribute money for
have a final say in which projects . The commissioners should become school construction. Composition of
have priority. They should go back directly involved in this area. The the school board may also be
to the construction of the basic Board of Commissioners - is an greatly affected by the outcome of
schools and stop paying architects integral part of thelegal structure the current campaign. Therefore,
outrageous fees to design school of public education. They are the re-evaluation of the county commis-
buildings with so much wasted tax-levying authority for schools. sioners' position is necessary re.
space in them. These county officials, who have the Sft ONSLOW, 5F

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Onslow
Front Page 1F of Commissioners and viewed by money comes from county, state c
garding the arrangement for the concerned citizens of the county. federal funds.
distribution of funds and the deter- However, I believe as the population 6) What approach do you think th
mination of school construction and Industries grew, zoning may be county should take in ensuring tha
expenditures. Responsible voters necessary within an orderly sewer services are available to me
can help the county commissioners manner. Present needs and to accommodat
reach the right decision. Cecil Aforton: expected growth?
3) The county is presently looking At the Present time the Planning David A Clement:
at additional office space. Would Board is evaluating some areas, For years I have proposed the
offices primarily in downtown the mainland side of the In- county officials confer with has
Jacksonville or would you like to see tracoastal Waterway, to determine officials about forming a consoli
the county invest in other locations? the need for zoning. If the Planning dated sewage district. It make
David A Clement: Board reccommends, I would consid- good sense. Many military installa
I favor locating public offices and er some limited zoning in these tions throughout the country use the
Services so as to achieve conve- areas to protect our estuarine areas. same sewage systems as are use
nience, and I equale convenience to I am not In favor of countywide by their civilian communities. Then
consolidation of related activities zoning at this time, but limited why not here? Now that we are
and ease of access. Renewal of the zoning in some areas may be beginning to talk about integration
downtown, area not only would desirable for the protection of of Marine Corps base military
remove an eyesore, but also would existing properly owners from un- children into the county schools
permit a convenient complex of desirable development and to ensure why not talk also about integration
county offices. that future development is consis- of civilian and military sewage.
Arthur Marshall Davis tent with existing growth patterns. Arthur Marshall Davis:
Keep the county offices all in BertPonsock: Good sewer systems are a health
downtown Jacksonville and add on Eventual countywide zoning could necessity. We do not have a choice
to what we already have. Why spend help determine the future growth in this matter. At the rate our
taxpayers dollars to buy other pattern in this area. Cautious communities are growing, we need
locations and then have to pay planning processes must be followed more sewer connections to take care
county employees for extra travel after careful and detailed studies of this growth. A study of what
expense? are made so that proper zoning is exists and the direction of need is
Larry Fitzpatrick: accomplished. This could create necessary to ensure an adequate
I am In favor of keeping the greater stability in planning and sewer system in our county.
county office complex in the growth development. Larry Fitzpatrick:
downtown area as long as property 5) The idea of workfare - making We must have a countywide sewer
is available. It is a convenient certain social services clients work system to develop our fast-growing
location and we already have an at public-service jobs to earn county properly and to protect
enormous investment in the Sum- assistance - is receiving some water quality. We already have
mersill Building, tax office budding, consideration in Onslow County. Do septic tank problems, and some land
county manager's office and the you have any reservations about does not "perk." We must start
pending expansion of the Sheriff's this proposal? planning now by looking at the
Department. David A. Clement: small sewer plants mow operating in
Sybil Gandy: If nothing else, work builds the county, consider the high growth
I believe it would be irresponsible character. The concept of earning areas that need sewer now, and plan
to move the county offices away an income is a better idea for all for funding a system that will not
from downtown Jacksonville. Gov- involved than is the concept of put an undue financial burden on
ernment offices need to be grouped welfare. There is some job suitable taxpayers or users.
together. As we expand the county for almost everyone. Let's find some Sybil Gandy:
complex, it would also help blot out fair work for all who can work and Perhaps we will have to apply the
the nauseating blight of adult make workfare workable. same method used in supplying
business around our law-making Arthur Marshall Davis: water, by serving the most populous
bodies. I do not have any reservations areas first and then moving on to
Willie Humphrey: about workfare. I feel a honest day's less populous areas as finances
County goverament should be work never hurt anyone and our become available. Perhaps requir-
centrally located whenever possible. future generations need the role ing larger developers to install
Only when the cost of additional model of a working parent. private systems with the un-
office space in downtown Jackson- Larry Fitzpatrick: derstanding that when the county
ville becomes prohibitive Should the I have reservations about becomes financially able it will
county invest in other locations. workfare until I know more about: assume responsibility for the opera-
The Rev. Floyd Jones: Who would be required to work? tion of the plant.
For many years the county How would they be supervised? Willie Humphrey:
government has used the downtown Would this stack another layer of The county should take the same,
area to Jacksonville as a center county government on top of what approach with sewer service that,
place for the county seat. I would be we already have? Above all, would was taken with countywide water.
in favor of keeping the county office the cost outweigh the savings to the The impetus for developing o-
in the downtown area of Jackson- taxpayer? countrywide sewer system should
ville unless office space and build- Sybil Gandy: come from the county, but it should
ings would not e availanle. This is a very constructive idea. It be paid for by user fees rather than
Cecile Aforton: not only helps our county finan- tax dollars. Sewer service should
A more efficient level of opera- cially, but it also helps the person begin in high development areas
tions could be achieved if all who is working gain a feeling of around our waterways and in other
county-related agencies were in one self-worth. It may also open up an high-development areas not served
central location. There are many avenue for employment. If an by town sewer systems.
demands being made on the county able-bodied person refuses to work, The Rev. Floyd Jones:
for provinding additional space to they shoudl be refused assistance. The approach of getting input
accommodate court-related func- Willlie Humphrey: from residents of Onslow County,
tions, and the amount of available Workfare should have been im- which was used in developing a
resources will eventually deetermine plemented many years ago. Social water system, could be copied in
the future location of county offices. Services clients that are physically developing a sewer system.
Bert Ponsock: and mentally able to work should be Cecil Morton:
Present traffic congestion in the given the opportunity to earn their The county recently authorized an
downtown area tends to favor the payment. The jobs they perform engineering firm to undertake a
investmemt in other loctions for should develop job skills that can be feasibility study reguarding coun-
additional office space. However, used in the private sector whenever tywide sewer. This study will assess
Larry Fitzpatrick: the efficient operation of county possible. the areas that are in most critical
I am not in favor of zoning beyond government must be the primary The Rev. Floyd Jones: need of sewer services, and the
to addressing these needs in study will also present alternatives
the beach, the sound side of Topsail concern. If the revitalization plan Any recipient of social services to addressing these needs in
Island and the airport at this time could providethe space and im- that is physically able should be particular areas. Construction of
sewer facilities is expensive, and I
because the county is too rural. But prove traffic, then the downtown given some work to do to supple- will need the infomation available
in the future, we may have to look area would be more favorable. ment the expense of our govern- from this study to make any
at zoning for industry and large, 4) Should the county expand zoning ment. decisions about providing sewer beyond the beach and the airport? If Cecil Morton: to addre Ing these needs veins
Sybil Gandy: you favor such an expansion, how I would favor this program if it services to areas of the county
Not at this time. If and when it far would you carry it? were cost-effective in that it would where a need exists. ever became necessary, there David A Clement: save more dollars than would be sewer facilities is expensive, and I
should be some type of grandfather Zoning is intended to protect the expended in program administra- will need the Information available
clause to protect those who are values that a neighborhood holds tion. There may be some question as from this study to make any
already established. dear; yet, zoning may be changed to whether or not sufficient private Providing sewer
Willie Humphrey: when the neighborhood favors sector jobs exist to employ the this program I it
Countywide zoning is not needed change. Furthermore, zoning number of public assistance recipi- it would where a need exists.
at the present time, but we should permits a neighborhood to have ents necessary to reduce welfare begin to look at areas that may need some influence over its own devel- rolls and result in reduced expen- d in program adrointra.
zoning soon. Areas around our towns opment. If intelligently conceived ditures. have ordered a feasibility study into
and the Intracoastal Waterway are and intelligently applied, I favor Bert Ponsock:
potential sites for zoning expansion. countywide zoning now. My reservations about workfare: the county water and sewer systems
The Rev. Floyd Jones: Arthur Marshall Davis: 'Don't spend a dollar to save a and their incorporation with or
I believe the county's zoning laws Zoning is for the protection of nickel." When the cost of the
should be scrutinized by the Board property rights and values. I have program exceeds the assistance government Systems Pending the
not given zoning limits a lot of saved, it is unwise to adopt the outcome of the study speculation of
consideration at this time. I do feel program regardless of whether the the needs and accommodations for
each zoning regulation should be
examined and studied very
carefully.

shopping centers and recreational would benifit the millitary and from that development will impove
facilities. civilian population. We must present our economy and increase our tax
The Rev. Floyd Jones: a unified front to lobby Washington base so we can provide our citizns
I believe the county commission expressing our concerns on the base with the necessary county services
ers should make some plan for the expansion. at minimum cost.
future dealing with the elderly The Rev. Floyd Jones: The Rev. Floyd Jones:
population. I believe the commis- I would not favor Onslow County I believe our county government
sioner should study the economy of spendng the taxpayers money for should have made some provisions
the county, and communicate the legal cost to battle the militarys in the past at the beach to provide
elderly's needs with various county proposal. However, I would favor for recreation and parking space
agencies such as hospital staff and setting aside a minimal amount to along with development. I believe
medical doctors,and with the state support a committe that is looking the county government could re-
into this matter for the interest of serve a larger area for recreation
Cecil Morton: concerned land owners. and parking.
The county is aware of the Cecil Morton: Cecil Morton: Property owners should have the
anticipated growth rate in its At the present time i so not feel right to develop their property
elderly population and a task force that it is necessary for the county to within allowable guidelines. Higher
has been appointed to study the expend any money fo legal fees. density development on the ocean
need of the elderly. Our elderly The county has assumed an active front is more desirable than higher
population will requie housing and role in opposing the takeover of land density on the sound side because it
services and the task force is through condemnation procedures affords geater protection of fragile
comprised of people who have some by adopting a resolution and by estuarine areas. These recommen-
expertise in this area. The task communcation its feling to mili- dations regulating the location of
force will identify specific needs tary officials and our federal higher density development have
which might require attention. representatives. We have asked the been made by the Planning Board,
Bert Poasock: congressman's assistance in ob- and I feel that existing regulations
There is a task force presently taining federal fundng for a study are sufficient to prohibit existing
formed to determine the future to evaluate the impact of this high density development from
needs of our expanding elderly proposed expansion on both the taking place on either the ocean
popiulation. Although we should people and the property which front or the sound side areas of the
encourage local housing industries might be affected. beach.
to help at present with eh shortage Bert Ponsock: Bert Ponsock:
of housing, further plans may rest By the time the battle over the Development is inevitable; there-
heavily on the reports of the task military's proposal to expand into fore, the encouragement of high
force, I would also encourage local southwestern Onslow County density development on the ocean
volunteer organizations to help reaches the courts, it will be too late front at the beach and less density
repair the present housing occupied to spend county money for legal on the sound side seems to be a
by the elderly. costs. The time for action is now. reasonable stance. However, this
(a( Would you favor spending any Alternate training areas must be should be slowly accomplished and
county meoneuy for legal costs if the found in the planning stage. only after careful and considerable
battle over the military's proposal (9) The county has assumed a evaluation of the environmental
to expand into southwestern Onslow stance of encouraging more high impact on the area.
County reaches the courts? If no density development on oceanfront (10) The county schools received
money shoud be used, what role land at the beach and less density about $300,000 this past year in
would you favor for the county? on the sound side. How doe you feel federal revenue sharing money.
David A. Clement: the beach should be developed? With the impending loss of revenue
I would avoid unpromising en- David A. Clement: sharing, would you favor increasing
jeavors, While I sympathize deeply To safeguard seafood nursery the allocation to county schools for
with those affected, I would place areas where there is an important capital improvements?
parmamount effort in negotiating the sound, I would encourage develop- David A. Clement:
best possible outcome for those who ment on the ocean front. But where Yes. The county should never
are displaced such as the movement there are no large nursery areas, I borrow money for expenses that can
of their choice provided by the would encourage development away be anticipated. Since school con-
Marine Corps. from the beach so that the public struction and maintenance can be
Arthur Marshall Davis: might continue to enjoy a view of clearly anticipated, the county
I Believe a polling of the people the ocean. should establish a school capital
who will be affected shoud be Arthur Marshall Davis: reserve fund into which annually is
undertaken first and then to what I believe that we should put a halt placed substantial sums of money to
extent the expansion will add to the to the development. God almighty pay for future capital improvements
county or what losses it will concur made the beaches for everyone's as they are needed.
before we start spending money on enjoyment, not just for those with Arthur Marshall Davis:
a legal battle. more money. If it keeps on at the Yes. I would favor increasing the
Larry Fitzpatrick: present rate, our children will not be allocation. Our children and grand-
I am in favor of financing the able to get on the beach. children need good sound basic
impact study to see what effect this Larry Fitzpatrick: schools for better education.
expansion will have, The course I I feel the beach and the sound side Larry Fitzpatrick:
think we should take to prevent this should be developed in accordance With a legislature-approved
expansion is for the citizens to band with the county's land-use plan, the half-cent sales tax for five years
together and get our elected and Coastal Area Management Act on targeted for new construction, and
appoinsted official(local, state and density and the Environmental with $1.2 million (40 percent of
federal) to work with us. Management Commission's current sales tax) plus $525,000
Sybil Gandy: guidelines for protecting water impact aid for maintaining teacher
No. Legally it is a winless quality and natural resources, supplements as well as repairing
situation. The commissioners have making sure there are plenty of and renovating current facilities, in,
taken the right stand by uniting and public beach accesses, restrooms five years our problems could be
letting those in Washington know and parking facilities. solved.
they oppose this proposal, pointing Sybil Gandy: Sybil Gandy:
out the tax base they have once That is probably the best plan Yes. With the increase of 500
before taken from Onslow. Con- since the sound side is more fragile. students per year, our finances
certed lobbing and as intensive If I understand the guidelines, for should be geared toward facilities.
letter-writing compaign may divert every unit built a developer must The schools are very crowded at the
this action. donate a certain protion of like land present and with the county growing
Willie Humphrey: to the county. I would rather have as it is, I see no signs of the school
Spending county money in a legal land donated on the ocean front than population decreassing in the futuree.
battle against the base expansion the sound side. Willie Humphrey:
would be fruitless. There have been Willie Humphrey: Capital improvements for our
several good alternatives to the base I believe beach development schools' must be met regardless of
expansion into seouthwestern Onslow should be provided in amanner that where the money comes from, but
County. Utilizting land in Hofmann will ensure no danger to the fragile we must make sure we are spending
Forest or Croatan National Forest is environment around the beach and our tax dollars wisely and with good
one alternative, Another alternative provide public parking and access to planning for the future. We must
proposed is the construction of a the beach. I believe our present provide good schools for future
four-lane road to present military zoning and environmental acts are generations. I believe that with a
facilities in Fort Bragg. This road moving in the right direction. A
well-developed beach and tourism See ONSLOW, 7F

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
August 12, 1986

IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch

Mr. Haskell Rhett
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403

Dear Mr. Rhett:

The Corps of Engineers is mandated by the Clean Water Act
under Section 404 to regulate the discharge of dredged and fill
materials into wetlands, many of which occur in the twenty coastal
counties. Within these counties, any permit issued by the Corps
requires a consistency determination by the State stating that the
proposed permitted activity is consistent with local land use
plans.

This brings us to our area of concern. At present, the local
land use plans do not identify wetlands. Wetland values which
have received national attention and recognition have apparently
attained only minimal importance at the local level.

The construction problems that are induced by wetland
characteristics (specifically hydric soils and poor drainage)
would appear to justify identification of these areas in local
land use plans to identify those areas where development would
require special measures. At the same time-, identification of the
wetlands would alert potential developers and the buying public
that Federal and State permission is required for certaia
activities.

We believe that a lot of confusion could be eliminated if
discussion and mapping of wetlands were included in the land use
plans. We would like to suggest several methods that could be
used to accomplish this goal.

a. The Coastal Resources Commission could designate wetlands
as an Area of Environmental Concern. This not only would as�ist

-2-

the State's role in making a consistency determination of a Corps
permit, but would allow the State to require a CAMA permit for the
action.

b. Designate wetlands as conservation areas under the present
classification scheme and map accordingly. Local definitions of
conservation areas would dictate what level of development would
occur in these areas, but the classification would "flag" wetlands
as areas where activities may require permits.

c. Create a special classification category called wetlands.
The local governments would have the flexibility to specify the
degree of local control over these areas, but the areas would be
identified as potentially regulated by the Corps of Engineers.

It should be pointed out that all wetlands are not regulated
by the Corps. The Corps regulates only those wetlands that it has
determined to be responsible for under Section 404 of'the Clean
Water Act. Although we do not have a map of Section 404 wetlands,
we believe that a very acceptable product for the purposes of
local land use plans can be obtained from the National Wetland
Inventory program (NWI). The NWI effort in North Carolina is
being conducted by Mr. Steve Leonard, Division of Soil and Water
Conservation. The NWI mapping is relatively economical and quick.
The INWI classification is broader and more encompassing than the
Corps jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the NWI mapping would identify
for planners, developers, and perspective buyers those areas that
are valuable for natural resources, those areas that would likely
pose development problems, and those areas that may require
permits.

Thank you for allowing this opportunity to relate our concerns
with you. We would be glad to meet with you and local government
officials to discuss this in greater detail.

Sincerely,

Charles W. Hollis
Chief, Regulatory Branch

Copy Furnished:

Mr. Joseph A. Uravitch
Regional Manager
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management
1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW.
Washington, D.C. 20235

COMMUNITY ISSUES/POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES

IT-- ISSUE

onslow County's growth has caused some problems but has also created
many benefits. The booming economy of the 1940's, 1950's and 1960's slowed
somewhat in the 19701s. This trend will probably continue throughout the
next decade. Much of the county's growth will continue to be in the vicinity
of the City of Jacksonville while some ., scattered rural and community
development will be evident.* The new County Water System may encourage
development in some portions of the county outside Jacksonville's "sphere
of influence". West onslow Beach will grow by leaos and bounds barring
problems associated with hurrIcanes. Beach erosion at this point in time

is minimal.

According to the Land Use Plan questionnaire, residents desire a
moderate amount of growth that can be handled properly while preserving
the existing character of rural areas. Successful promotion of industry
;In the vicinitv of our communities and the airport should generate some

growth.

Policies include:

1. Allowing development to occur in an orderiv manner.
2. Permit intense development in those areas which are served or

will be served with urban services.

Means for implementini@t policies include:

1. Establish a Land Use Plan by which development proposals mav be,
reviewed for consistency.
2. Conform to the State's Balanced Growth Policv.

3. Conform to all land use ordinances enforced by Onslow County.

Primary responsibility will lie with the Board oF County Commissioners, the
Planning Board, the Countv Mana,!er, zind*the County Planning Director.

7
loin
%;;j.M.TSSUE-@:- esot!4rce Prote'c-.t
A. ocean dunes and beaches E. Estuarine shoreline
B. Coastal wetlands, F. Other hazardous, fragile or historic

C. Estuarine waters areas

D. Public trust waters G. Off-road vehicles

Suitable Uses

A. hes Uses shall be compatible with CAIMA regulations
,ese-rVe Dune System and policies. Highest priority given to preserving the dune system
In Need and preserving access to the beach strand. Onslow County Subdivision
-s No Process To Do -- Regulations require a 10 ft. pedestrian access for every 600 ft. of
ocean-front subdivision. Second priority is given to uses which comply
with all local, state and federal laws. DeDending on the site and
-eserve Access to 0
@ach surrounding land uses, possible uses could include residential, commercial,
public, semi-public or recreational uses.
B. Uses shall be compatible with CA-MA regulations and
7eserve Coastal
policies. Highest priority shall be given to preserving coastal wetlands.
,tlands
Second priority shall be given to those activities which require water
access and cannot function elsewhere, or agricultural areas.

t-'-F ne- wat ers - Uses
C. 'E� ua shall be compatible with CM regulations and
policies. Conservation of these waters and its components is verv
important. Uses shall be allowed which require water access or which
cannot function elsewhere such as channels, erosion control structure,
navigational channels, docks, marinas, piers, wharfs, pilings or bridges.
Uses shall he compatible with CAMA regulations and
3nitoring of policies. Permitted uses shall not hinder access or cause biological
ater Quality or physical damage to the estuary. These uses include navigational
x channels, drainage ditches, ero-sion control structures, piers, w-harfs,
marinas, and bridges. Uses should be monitored to insure that navigation
will not be hindered, erosion will not be perpetuated, and water qualitv

will not be damaged.
E. iLr --shoreline,.@- A strip of land 75 feet wide from mean high water
@'i6arine
inland. Uses shall be comDatible with CAMA regulations anc policies.
Future development should be compatible with the nature and the values
of the estuarine svstem. Permitted uses should consist of recreational

uses and low density residential and commercial uses which will not PreatIv

increase run-off into an estuary.

F. Othiet"*nazardouS,@,i@i-ci@iii-@i-or istoric areasi- Builders and home-buyers
should be aware that the New River Inlet has historically moved north
.lei Regulations for and south for several thousand feet from its present location. The
?totection of Dunes
't'?Iritime Forests inlet is presently moving southerly and could endanger structures
In Need adjacent to it in the future. All uses in the @nlet hazard area,as
&`,es No Process To Do
defined by the Coastal Resources Commission, shall comply with all
CAMA regulations and policies. In 1979 the Onslow County Planning
Board, considering maritime forests -and dunes outside AEC's as a
unique resource, drew up regulation s to protect them. These regulations
were never approved. According to the Onslow Countv Archeological
le ew of Archeo- Assessment conducted in Part of Onslow County in 1979, many portions of
L011cal Sites a part
7-f Subdivision review the county have archeological significance. Most of the sites are
ess located along the White Oak River and at West Onslour Beach. Lands
'I known to have archeological significance will be reviewed prior to any
X
development. The N. C. Division of Archives and History will be
notified and also given an opportunity to review the sites. This review
is allowed through the Onslow County Subdivision Regulations, Article
TAX, Section 3.04.
Portions of Onslow County around Albert J. Ellis Airport are subject to
high noise levels and potential airplane accidents. A Land Use and
Noise Analysis is presently being conducted to determine where problem
areas are and what can be done to either alleviate them or to keep them
from multiplying. Recommendations made in this st udy should be considered
to preserve the safety and property of nearby residents.
O_@f-r_6_dd'-,Vehiclet - Off-road vehicles are presently regulated by the
ARoad Vehicle
Regulations Need county at West Onslow Beach. From May 1.5 to September 10 of each year
vements
no vehicles are allowed on the beach strand or dunes. Only four-wheel
X drive vehicles (with 2 minor exceptions) are allowed on the beach strand
during other periods. Strick regulations are enforced as to crossovers

and legal driving areas.

..eans ot protecting AE- s and other @,cnsitive areas while insuring public access:
Implementation methods for protectin:, AEC'f; and other sensitive areas while
insuring public access-,
A
X 1. Support the work of the work of the North Caro:;.ina office of 1@oastal
- anagement and the local CANA P(!rmi.t Officer.
2. Support the evaluation and permitting of activities in environmentally
X
sensitive areas by the U. S. Army Corns of Engineers and N. C. Division

In Need
s No Process To Do
of Marine Fisheries.
3. Continue to enforce health regulations relevant to septic tank placement-
4. Protect environmentally sensitive areas by locating new development in
accordance with the CAMA Land Use Plan.
5. Seek grants to study and evaluate our natural resources.
6. Seek the purchase or donation of oceanfront and other beach property
to provide public access to the Atlantic Ocean and sufficient parking
areas. Fencing and crosswalks should be installed to protect the
Sune system.
x 7. Adopt a Flood Hazard ordinance after the county has been officially
mapped for flood prone areas.
x 8. Support the construction of central facilities.where septic tank
effluent is a contributor to water pollution and shellfish closings.
X- -9. Build permanent vehicle crossovers from the highway to the beach strand.
10. Continue to enforce the ordinance regulating vehicular traf f ic on the

beach strand.

-11. Continue to require the donation of easements for public access in beach
subdivisions as provided in the Onslow County Subdivisions Regulations
or the donation of an leas t an equivalent amount of oceanfront propertY.

urce-Production and Maiftagemii;ltl

Onslow County has a number of resources which are very productive and
should be protected. They include:

A. Productive agriCultural lands.

B. Commercial forest lands.

C. Mineral production areas.
D'. Commercial and recreational fishing.

A. Productive "iiiicultural laiid; - If growth continues to occur under present
laws and policies, there is a greater possibility of converting productive
agricultural land to non-agricultural uses. Three options exist: (1) try
to stop growth, which is totally undesirable; (2) promote growth anywhere,
which is equally undesirable; or (3) develop Onslow County with sensitivity
to what is already here and at a rate our resources can handle while
preserving our agricultural land.

Policies include:

1. Encouraging the use of productive agricultural lands for,agriculture.
2. Assessing land constraints prior to changing land from agricultural

uses.

3. Encouraging the passage of bills in the General Assembly which would
preserve productive agricultural land.
4. Encouraging farm programs which will keep good land in cultivation.
5. Encourage federal procurement authorities at Camp Lejeune to purchase
more local agricultural products for use on the Base.
In Needilleans of implementation:
7esko Process To -n-
X 1. Use the Soil Conservation Service soil survey in evaluation proposed
developments.
X 2. Have farmers sign tax agreements for keeoing property valuations
lower in exchange for keeping their land in agriculture.
X 3. Work with the Agricultural Extension Service and other agricultural
related organizations to improve awareness of the necessity of

preserving productive land.

B. Commercial forest lands - Commercial forest lands comprise over three-fourths
of the land area in Onslow County. Much of this land is owned by timber
companies while private individuals, the U. S. government and the State own
the rest. This resource is not only important to Onslow County but to the
entire southeastern portion of the State. Many incomes are derived through
Forest products. However, due to nature's delicate

balance, our forest resources should not be abused.

Policies include:

I. Encourage reforestation of harvested timber land.
2. Encourage land-owners to work with agencies (N. C. Forest Service, etc.)
that will help them protect and market their timber.
3. Encourage landownQrs to protect fragile areas adjacent to their timber
In Need land (marsh, estuaries, etc.).
@s No Process To Do
Means of implementation-

1. -Landowners are eligible for free seedlings through the local ASCS office..
2. Ask landowners to contact the N. C. Forest Service before burning of

- any type.
3. Ask landowners to check into proper harvesting techniques and reforest-
ation methods before cutting timber.

4. Ask landowners to leave a natural barrier around streams when cutting
timber in an effort to cut down on pollution and siltation.

Areas - Mineral resources in Onlsow Countv are mini
C. Mal.

Only scone is being mined in the Belgrade community adjacent to the
White Oak River. However, large peat bogs are located in several por tions
of the county and may be a source for future energy demands.

Policies include:

1. Support the development of mineral deposits found in the future.
Insure that developing mineral resources does not harm our economy or
Our water and air quality.
3. Requesting consultation in the revicur process before peat mining is allowed.
4. Peat mining should be done in s.uch a manner as to protect estuarine water
quality.
Support the conversion of peat to methanol near the mining site to protect
our highways and attract more industry.
Means of Implementation:

x 1. Seek grants to fund the evaluation of developing our mineral resources
such as peat.
2. Stipport the preparation of environmental impact statements for projects
like peat mining.

3. Work with the State in reviewing peat mining proposals.

In NeedD. 7i7-sINZ V" The fishing industry has always
'@es No Process To Do been i*
mportant to Onslow County and is continuing to grow. However,
siltation, fresh water intrusion and shallow channels are causing
problems which must be alleviated.

Policies include:

1. Support the expansion of commercial and recreational fishing and

shellfish.

2. Improve access to ports through widening and deepening channels.
3. Support efforts to limit fresh water intrusion into salt waters.
4. Support efforts to cut down on the siltation and pollution of our

salt water estuaries.

5. Support efforts to expand markets for local seafood.
6. Support efforts to determine the problems of the White Oak River and

resolve them.

'7
Encourage federal procurement authorities at Camp Lejeune to purchase
more local, fresh seafood for use on the Base.
Yeans of implementation:

X 1. Have the Economic Development Commission seek to have seafood
processing industries locate in Onslow County or to find seafood
processing industries that will handle more of the local catch.
X 2. Seek funding from state and federal agencies that can provide funds
for dredging channels into the New River and White Oak River for

better boat access.

1. Evaluate all channelization projects that can cause water quality

problems in our estuaries.
4. Seek funds to build an artificial fishing reeF off the coast.
X 5. Seek funding to evaluate the effects of the N. C. 24 bridge-causeway
and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway on the Nrhite Oak River.
X 6. Seek funding to implement the recommendations of the White Oak
River Study.

.W onbmic and Community bevelopment.
A. Residential E. Energy Resources
B. Commerical F. Commitments to state and federal progra
C. Industrial G. Redevelopment of older areas
1). Public facilities F. Channel maintenance and beach nourishment

A. Presently only 11% of Onslow County's housing stock is
substandard, a very low figure compared to other counties in eastern
North Carolina. Occupancy rates of available housing are verv hLgh.
'If present rates continue, more than 2,600 new housing units must be
-btiilc by 1990 to keep up with growth. Look for mobile homes to increase
in popularity as conventional single-family homes increase in price.

Policies include:

1. Encourage the development of various housing types (such as mobile
home parks, planned unit developments, apartments, conventional
single-family homes, etc.) in the proper location.
2. Support efforts to improve the quality of living in Onslow County,
3. Support local communities in their efforts to be served by water

and sewer facilities.

4. Encourage residential development to occur near municipalities

or communities.
In Need 5. Help communities with their water and sewer problems.
Yes No PTocess To Do @feans of implementation:

x 1. Continue to enforce county-wide Subdivision Regulations.
x 2. Continue to enforce the State Building Code and CAMA Regulations.
x 3. Enforce the Onslow County '7oning Ordinance where residents fpel
it is necessarv to preserve their rights.
x 4. Educate county residents about the benefits of zoning.
x 5. Continue to seek funds such as Community Development Block G'rants
to improve housing and publfc services.
x 6. Continue to support the Countv Water System.
x Continue to support health and sanitation regulations.
x
8. Continue to support the housing rehabilitation efforts of the
Dept. of Social Services, RegLon P and other qualified a@,,encies.

9. Seek funding for community facilities through EPA, Farmers Home
Administration, HUD, etc.'

B. Commeripial-development In Onslow County is increasing as shown by the
.......... @.- - - - - -
construction-of a new mall this year on Western Boulevard. This new
development is needed to serve existing and future.residents.
Need
No Not Sure To Do Policies include:

X- I. Commercial development should,,be clustered around intersections
and not stripped along major highways.
X- 2. Commercial devel:opment should be compatible with its surroundings
and not encroach on residential areas.

3. Onslow County should work to recruit new businesses.
4. Regulate the location and density of adult businesses.
5. Promote tourism throughout the county.

Implementation methods:

1. Enforce the Onslow County Zoning Qrdinance where it is deemed
necessary by the Board of County Commissioners.

2. Encourage businesses to locate at intersections.

C. Ind'6trial'-' The need to diversify our economy is paramount. Not only
would new industry provide more, better paying jobs, but it would add
to the county's tax base, spur home building, generate more retail
sales and many other benefits. IWIien seeking industry, however, we
should seek quality and not quantity. We should also seek industry that
will not waste or pollute our natural resources.

Policies include:

1. Encouraging industries that will be compatible with the surrounding
communities, and will comply with state and federal standards.
2. Supporting public facilities extentions as inducement for locating
industry in Onslow County.

3. Evaluating the impact of new industry (in the countv's resources.
4. Seeking military discharges with proper training to work for local

industries.

5. Working with local industries in the training of workers at the new.
Skills Center at Coastal Carolina Community College.

I'leans of implementation:

I . DeveloD an evalua_t_i_on__criXzrja_in cooperation with the Economic Develop_
ment Commission for new industry (see Environmental Effects of Potential

DeveloDment Activities in Coastal Onslow County).
X 2. Continue supporting the Economic Development Commission.
X 3. Help local communities with their planning and financing of community
facilities.

X 4. Coordinate the efforts of the Onslow County Planning Department, Y. 0. U.
and the Economic Development Commission in locating industrial sites.

onslow County is awaiting the results of the CEIP study being done by the
%:. C. Office of Coastal Management before dealing with policies related to
outer continental shelf pipeline landfalls and corridors or off-shore coal

facilities.

D. YKublic" facilAties - The questionnaire which is a part of this land use
plan gives some indication as to the types of services and facilities
requested by the citizens of Onslow County.

?olicies include:

1. Developing services and facilities in coordination with expected growth.
Locating services and facilities where they may best serve the county's.

population.
3. Seeking funds from various sources to provide public facilities for
county residents.

Means of implementation:

1. Prepare and distribute a citizen survey periodically to deterTune levels
of need..
2. Address the following needs as recorded through the Citizens Land

Flan Questionnaire.
X
a. Mai@tai'n mosquito control and drainage by air spraying and ditching
in areas where stagnantwater stands. Coordination with State
regulations in necessarv.
X b. Continue to improve county recreation facilities and beach access
for the public by developing a Master Park Plan for

the county and by purchasing or receiving donations of land at

West Onslow Beach. Continue to require pedestrian easements as
required by the County Subdivision Regulations. Funding: County

taxes and the National Park Service.

C. tion systems in order to
foster economic development. Promote the widening of U. S. 17,
I
mote connection N. C. 24, and U. S. 258, paving secondary and primary roads, bridge
-01-40 to beach improvements, improved channelization of the New River and White Oak
area
River, and continued operation of all railroad lines in the county.
J- Funds: Dept. of Transportation, U. S-. Army Corps of Engineers,
Sea Grant program.
d. Schools - Improve the quality of schools by updating classrooms
facilities, cutting teacher/student ratios and building other facilities
deemed necessary by the Board of Education when funds pemit. Funding:

State of North Carolina, U. S. Government, county taxes, county bond

referendum.

e. Public transit - Public transit is being offered to a number of needy
X ----------------
residents by OUTS (Onslow United Transit System), a combined effort
of the Dept. of Social Services and several other human service agencies.
Additional public transit is provided by Camp Lejeune for its personnel.
The opportunity for a county public transit system is remote due to the

lack of dense population.

A study should be done to determine the feasibilitv of Dublic transit

in the Jacksonville - Camp Lejeune area.
Funding: U. S. Dept. of Transportation.
f Land use planning - An effort should be made to implement a comprehensive
"oning where Neeiled
land use planning program in portions of Onslow County subject to future
-----developme nt demands. This includes continued use of the County
id Waste Subdivision Regulations, rises,,
solid waste planning, implementing CAMA regulations, etc. Funding:
County taxes, CAMA grants.
Under'take measures to reduce crime in the county. Evaluate and study
existing policies and methods and determine a course of action by 1985.
Fund i n,", :County ta-.--.us, State of North Carolina.
X h. Review the Land Use Plan annually to insure compatibtlitv with the
plans and programs o[ other counties, our municipalities, and camp r.ejeune.
i. Di-@ciiss with officials at Camp Lo-ioune the possLbilitv of locating a landfill
tin the periferv of the Base which could he used, if feasible, bv both the
f3;1!4u atid the Countv.

E. %,,,Energy Resources A local as well as a national issue is the need to
conserve our existing resources in addition to identifying and developin
new resources. Easily identifiable energy resources throughout the
county include the wind, peat, wood, corn, chicken and swine manure ' and
garbage. However, the feasibility of using these resources cannot be
determined without further study.

Policies include:

I Evaluating our energy resources so that we may plan for effective

utilization.
2. Evaluating the impact of developing our energy resources on the

surrounding environment.
3. Promoting the development of locally produced alternative fuels.
4. Promote the Onslow County Energy Commission and its public education

programs.

Means of implementation:

1. Seeking grants to fund the evaluation of our energy resources.
2. Preparing Environmental Impact statements for energy development

projects.
3. Seeking grants to determine the impact of energy projects on the
county's economy.
(Funds may be available through the [J. S. Dept. of Energy).

F. Onslow County is commited
to those programs that will help the economy, preserve our natural
resources and make Onslow County a nice, safe place to live.

Policies include:

1. Continue to work with Camp Lejuene in making Onslow County a good
place to live.
2. Continue to support CAMA rt!gmlations and to limit development in
highly erodible areas.
3. Work with appropriate state and federal agencies to locate and use
spoil areas (with property owner consent) for dredging projects in

the New River and White Onk Kiver.

,-ssis t in developing and implementing plans for dredging New River
-nd rehabilitating the White Oak River.
*-'=-lp the state and federal governments to enforce their laws and
censing requir-,ments contained herein by working with them.

In Need Means Of implementation:
Yes No Process To Do

1. -developing a task force made tip of representatives from Camp Lejeune,
11'ew River Air Station, Onslow County and itts municipalities to meet
periodically to discuss mutual problems as related to land use,

solid waste, sewage, transportation, etc.
2. Seeking funds to rehabilitate the White Oak River and dredge deeper

channels for the New River.
G.---Redevelopment of older areas:@' Since much of Onslow County has grown since
1940, most areas are relatively new. However, those areas which are older
and need economic stimulus should be helped, within the capabilities of

onslow County.

Policies include:

1. Encouraging builders and property owners to build new buildings and
improve existing ones.
2. Serving these areas with county water when economically feasible.
3. Seeking funds (state, federal) for redevelopment.

Means of implementation:

1. Meet- ng With prospective homebuilders to advise them about building in
redevelopment areas.
? Apply for Community Development Block Grants L'or redevelopment of those
areas that qualify.
1* Reviow applications for public facilities from redevelopable areas.

Channel Maintenance and Beach Renourishment

Channel maintenance is a problem for portions of several bodies of water
in Onslow County. New River Inlet must be dredged very often to keep it open
The intersection of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway with the New River
Inlet also must be dredged frequently. A 12 foot deep channel, like the inlet
and the AlWW, also is maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
portions of New River. Marinas and fish houses in the Sneads Ferry community
often have problems with their boats running aground trying to get to and
from the Corps maintained channel in the New River.
The White Oak River, along Onslow County's eastern border, has many
problems such as siltation, poor flushing and fresh water intrusion. These
are documented in the White Oak River System Study, (Henry Von Oesen and
Associates, Wilmington, N. C. 1981). Bogue Inlet, also along Onslow County's
eastern border, is one of the widest and most fluctuating inlets along the
entire North Carolina coastline. Due to many factors, the inlet is shallow
and dredging must be done to allow commercial vessels to enter and exit.
Beach renourishment is not a problem for West Onslow Beach at this point
because of low erosion rates over the past 40 years. Future projections show
only a gradual erosion of 2.5 feet or less.

Policies include:
1. Encouraging the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to continue dredging the

Atlantic Intracostal Waterway. New River Inlet, New River and Bogue Inlet.

2. Encouraging the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to dredge portrions of the

White Oak River.

3. Requesting help from the State of North Carolina in saving the White Oak

River from siltation, poor flushing and its other problems.

4. Reviewing alternatives of action if the erosion rates at West Onslow Beach

begin creating a need for a renourishment project.

In Need
Yes No Process To Do Implementation methods:

X 1. Contacting the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and Congressmen if funds for

present maintenance dredging are endangered to request that the funds

not be ommited.

X 2. Requesting, through our Congressman, that funds be allocated by Congress to dredge the White Oak River in accordance with approariate plans required

by the state and federal government.

3. Conducting the approciate studies which could determine the * of

action to saving the White Oak River.

4. Consider organizing a Special Service District at West Onslow Beach to

pay for all or part of beach renourishment, should erosion become a

problem.

I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I"
i
I
I
I
I
I
III 111111111 111
3 6668 14101 0597 11