[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
NH WORK TASK 89-5.2.2 TOWN OF STRATHAM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION PLAN 1990 Supplement to the Stratham Master Plan Prepared for The Stratham Planning Board Prepared by The Rockingham Planning Commission HD 1694 N4 W387 1990 WATER RESOURCE MM4AGEMENT AM PROTECTION PLAN for the Town of Stratham Master Plan Prepared for the STRATHAM PLANNING BOA" by the ROCKINGHAM PLANNING COMMISSION June, 1990 U . S . DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CENTER 2234 SOUTH HOBSON AVENUE CHARLESTON , SC 29405-2413 e, The New Hampshire Coastal Program provided a grant for the preparation of this C"- document which was financed in part by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad-inistration- INN Property of CSC Librazy J TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 I. SURFACE WATER RESOURCES ........................................ 2 II. GROUNDWATER RESOURCES .......................................... 11 III. POTENTIAL THREATS TO WATER RESOURCES ........................... 17 IV. GROWTH IN DEMAND FOR WATER ..................................... 26 V. INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................... 28 VI. EXISTING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES ................................. 31 VII. ANALYSIS ....................................................... 34 VIII*RECOMMENDATIONS*,***,*,**,*,**,*,****,*******,****,**,,** ...... 39 LIST OF TABLES AND MAPS Table 1 Unnamed Perennial Streams ................................. 7 Table 2 Acreage of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas .................. 8 Table 3 Nonpoint Pollution Sources and Remedies ................ 18 Table 4 Groundwater Discharge Permit Holders .................... 24 Table 5 Projected Water Demandooo ................ -oo ............. 27 Map A Regional Watersheds ....................................... 3 Map B Watersheds and Perennial Water Bodies ............ o... o.... 4 Map C Wetland Soils .......... o .................... o- .......... 9 Map D Flood Hazards and Bedrock Geology-o ...... o ....o ........... 10 Map E Aquifers .....o ...... o-o- ... o ........ 0 ....0....... 0 .... 13 Map Aquifers and Wells ........ o...... o ........... o............ 14 Map G Potential Pollution Sources ............................... 21 Map H Principal Point Pollution Sources to the Squamscott River and Great Bay- .......... o .... o ..................... 25 Map I Soils Suitability for Septic Systems ....o ............. o ... 30 APPENDICES Page APPENDIX I Summary of Well Completion Report Data for the Town of Stratham ............................. 45 APPENDIX II Public Water Systems Inventory ....................... 54 APPENDIX III Inventory of Underground Storage Tanks ............... 56 APPENDIX IV Zoning Map and Aquifer Locations ..................... 57 APPENDIX V Future Land Use Map and Aquifer Locations ............ 58 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION INTRODUCTION This component of the Town of Stratham Master Plan addresses the requirements, established by the New Hampshire Office of State Planning under the authority of RSA 4-C:.20,I, for the preparation of local water resource management and protection plans. The purposes of this chapter are to identify and describe surface and groundwater resources; to identify existing and potential threats to these resources; to evaluate the adequacy of water resources to meet the current and future needs of the Town; to evaluate existing local programs which have the potential to impact water resources; and to identify regulatory and nonregulatory programs that could further enhance water resource management and protection efforts. The protection and wise use of water resources are of critical concern to the Town of Stratham. With virtually every person in Town dependent on private wells ' for domestic, public, and business use, the quantity and quality of Stratham's groundwater must be protected from depletion and/or contamination. Other Town water resources, such as rivers, streams, and wetlands, are important not only because they are often hydrologically related to groundwater, but because they provide ecological, scenic and recreational value to the Town as a whole. In general, there is a direct relationship between land use and water quality. Uses in areas with poor suitability can degrade and contaminate both surface and groundwater, increase flood hazards, destroy water-based wildlife and inter- fere with scenic and recreational values. It is the responsibility of the Town to take reasonable precautions to protect all water resources from incompatible uses and, in so doing, protect the health and general welfare of the community. 1. SURFACE WATER RESOURCES Watersheds The Town of Stratham has approximately 330 acres of surface water, which is equivalent to 3.3 percent of its total acreage. As depicted in Map A - "Regional Watersheds", the Town contains portions of three regional watersheds - the drainage areas for the Squamscott River, Great Bay, and the New Hampshire Coast. This information was taken from the "Regional Watersheds Map" developed by the Rockingham Planning Commission in February 1989. The sources used for this map were 7.5 minute topographic maps, covering Rockingham County, published by the U.S. Geological Survey between 1973 and 1981. The following paragraphs provide a general description of each regional watershed. a. Squamscott River watershed: The Squamscott River has a total length of about 6.2 miles. The River is tidal and is primarily f ed by the Exeter River. The Squamscott River watershed covers portions of four towns - Exeter, Newfields, Newmarket, and Stratham. The total area is approximately 12,019 acres (18.8 square miles). The area of the watershed contained within Stratham is about 5,730 acres (8-9 sq. mi.). b. Great Bay watershed: The Great Bay estuarine system, covering approximate] ,y 17 sq. mi. is one of the largest estuaries along the east coast of the United States. This system is formed by the convergence of seven rivers: the Salmon Falls, Cocheco, Bellamy, Oyster, Lamprey, Squamscott, and Winnicut with a total watershed area of 930 square miles. In order to isolate a meaningful drainage area that was within the Rockingham Planning Region, the Great Bay watershed was delineated to cover portions of six towns - Greenland, Hampton, Newington, North Hampton, Portsmouth, and Stratham (as shown on Map A). The watershed area is approximately 74,930 acres (117 sq. mi.). The land area of the Great Bay water-shed contained within Stratham is about 690 acres (1.1 sq. mi.). C. Coastal watershed: The receiving water bodies of the Coastal -Watershed are the Piscataqua River and the Atlantic Ocean. The Piscataqua River originates in Rollinsford, NH and is fed by the Salmon Falls, Cocheco, and Bellamy Rivers. The Piscataqua River is tidal and flows along the shores of Newington, Portsmouth, and New Castle for about seven miles before emptying into the Atlantic Ocean. New Hampshire's oceanfront shoreline is approximately 18 miles long. The Coastal watershed covers portions of 11 towns within the region - Seabrook, Kensington, Hampton Falls, Hampton, Exeter, Stratham, North Hampton, Greenland, Rye, Portsmouth, and Newington. The area of the Coastal wa'tershed is about 50,100 acres (78 sq. mi.). The area of the watershed within Stratham is only about 90 acres (0.14 sq. mi.). Watersheds Within Municipal Boundaries The Great Bay and Squamscott River watersheds were each divided into two sub- watersheds within the Town: Great Bay, Winnicut River, Squamscott River, and Dearborn Brook, respectively. Sub-watersheds were not delineated for the Coastal watershed. These drainage areas are depicted on Map B - "Watersheds and Perennial Water Bodies" (source: Exeter, Hampton, Newmarket, and Portsmouth, N.H. Quadrangle; 7.5 minute topographic maps; U.S. Geological Survey, 1973). 2 REG I ONAL WATERSHEDS Source: USGS 1:100000 DLG Files Regional Tatersbeds Prepared by the Rockingham Planning Commission j U B e1990 S c a I e1 2 2 5 m i I e s SRG NET TON PORTSMOU N CASTLE Svmws vo 9 E E L D S e t R A A M D RYE iTa S C 0 t E ET R 0 B A"111 P Al. s- a- I M P 104-`,/2 N 4 TO F i L L S --on Fab S B Map A t4L Crod 3 watersheds and Perennial Water Bodies Map B, qAIL ROAD wateraw Boundau 0, Sn N MAINE CAm 'A' Watershed 0 BART q pevnnw water Body t lei I'A o' ROAD prepm,ed by the pAddngbarn Planning Commission 4 June 1990 Sources: Exeter, kAt 7.S ===q=r=UrS- @===urfty- -Dorn Data for Rivers and Stream" N.H. Water Resources Board; February 1"9. TURNBERRY CONDO. .0,5, 0 Cb v R It CIRCLE SOOAMP S T Q HILL T S-P2 THOMPSON A S -9 % BROOK 'Irc STRATHAM cREEW ASERDEEK @IFF@@ FARM DR. WE) A0_AV- 01 ,1 L 0 S-Pi LONG tIVILL Ohl r MORAL DAM R A ERS HIGH MLIc D" 57REET DR. MIL C C j. 00"Afr 1011@ 4r, C OR MA 4 g7 LEc,,,,C DR. ON So Z.Z. S-6 W1 FIELD Tn fn A S-3 DAM I'm BAVW;r 0 2 *1NN LIT .1 WILL NO W-2 z BOW CUT t- it ROAD ItRylft LANE S-2 GAS LINE W-1 .01 BROOK #Of' w 00 %VOOD DRIVE Or 09 a "IN S-1 z COURT Cf- In "IL L f3600K Roads Updated September 1988 DRURY CO" I& by the Rockingham Planning Commission PLAINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED DEARBORN OR Prepared by KA Sa,ithooote,n No. Homp,h- R.Q;-n-I Planning Ca-mIss-- PIN F HILL W.I., Sf-t r.for, No. Hampshire 03833 J-..Iy 1916 "Th. p,.P.r.t- of th,o map -% fjA01cI0IIV Q,dod th(019h oFeaeral grant from fro Doooltmsm cf mous,nq and U Do, I'--Igpm.nI, nd., th. Co.plIthtyr-N. Pl.nn,.g A- P'09,cm a.thorl..d by S.cf.on 701 of th. o..,.g ACI .1 1954 ., m.nd.d VANNICUT 1000 0 '000 2000 5000 son , U.W.M-EMN-,- _6 ...... mw SCALE I @neh - 1000 foot All of Stratham's water bodies have a legislative classification of "B", except for Dearborn Brook which has Class "A" waters (source: Legislative Classification of Surface Waters map; N.H. Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission, 1986). Class "A" water has uniformly excellent quality and requires only disinfection in order to be used as a drinking water supply. Class "B" water is of lower quality and requires more treatment in order to be potable. A description of each drainage area is presented below. a. Squamscott River: The tidal Squamscott River serves as Stratham's western border. It is also the Town's largest river, and is among the largest of the Seacoast Region. A unique feature of the Squamscott River is its oxbow, a landform created by the meandering path of the River. In 1880, the Oxbow was cut through to create a sfraight channel for shipping (source: The Exeter-Squamscott River of Many Uses; 0. Tardiff; printed by CGC, Rye, N.H. ; 1986). At that time, and during subsequent dredgings of the River, the Oxbow was substantially filled with dredging spoils. Today, a canoe-sized boat can travel the Oxbow, but only during high tide. Within Stratham, the Squamscott River sub-watershed is 5,730 acres (9-0 sq.mi.). The Squamscott River flows for 5.2 miles, from an elevation of approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to sea level, before emptying into Great Bay. No dams are located along the River. According to the New Hampshire Water Quality Report to Congress 305(b), the Squamscott Rfver is the only perennial water body in Stratham that does not meet its legislative classification for water quality of "B" (source: N.H. Department of Environmental Services, Water Supply and Pollution Control Division; April 1988). The report states that the water quality problems of the Squamscott River are caused by the Exeter Wastewater Treatment Facility. However, the treatment plant has recently been upgraded (1989), which should mitigate its impact to the River. Twelve perennial tributaries, which originate in Stratham and flow in a westerly direction, flow into the Squamscott River (which is approximately at sea level). These perennial water bodies include: Jewett Hill Brook, Mill Brook, Parkman Brook, Wheelwright Creek, and eight unnamed streams (coded as Sl to S9 on Map B and Table 1). Of these streams, only Mill Brook and stream "S-5" have dams (as depicted on Map B). 1) Jewett Hill Brook: Jewett Hill Brook originates just south of Jewett Hill at 150 feet above MSL and has a total length of 2.2 miles. 2) Mill Brook: Starting at High Street, Mill Brook is at an elevation of 130 feet, and flows for 3.6 miles to the Squamscott River. 3) Parkman Brook: Parkman Brook originates between Bunker Hill Road and Stratham Heights Road, at 90 feet above MSL- The Brook flows for 2.2 miles to the Exeter town line, and ultimately converges with Wheelwright Creek at 15 feet above MSL. 4) Wheelwright Creek: Wheelwright Creek marks the southwestern border of Stratham. Within Stratham, the Creek is only 500 feet and is at an elevation of 10 feet above MSL. 5 Stratham's Squamscott River watershed also contains three naturally- occurring' ponds that are unnamed and relatively shallow (coded as S-Pl to S-P3 on Map B). In addition, Stratham's Squamscott River watershed contains a man-made pond - Mill Pond. Mill Pond has an elevation of 30 feet, an area of 2.5 acres, and is located at the traffic circle where Routes 101 and 108 intersect. Specific data for Stratham's unnamed ponds are as follows: S-Pl: Located just south of Jewett Hill, at an elevation of 150 feet, and with an area of 12 acres. S-P2: Located southwest of Stratham Hill, at 150 feet above MSL, and has an area of 6 acres. S-P3: Also located next to Stratham Hill, this pond is 3 acres, and is at an elevation of 150 feet. b. Dearborn Brook: The Dearborn Brook sub-watershed is located in the southern part of Stratham. Within Town, the watershed covers about 570 acres (0-9 sq. mi.). Dearborn Brook starts at 90 feet above MSL and flows westerly for 2,500 feet, and drops 35 feet in elevation, before crossing into Exeter. A dam is located 1.3 miles downstream in Exeter, thereby forming the Exeter Reservoir. The Town of Exeter uses the reservoir as an auxiliary water supply during periods of high demand. C. Great Bay: The northern tip of Stratham contains the southwestern edge of Great Bay. The Town has approximately 3,000 feet of shoreline along the Bay. The total water surface of Great Bay covers 5,696 acres (8-9 sq. mi.) at mean high water and 2,688 acres (4.2 sq. mi.) at mean low water (source: Great Bay National Estuarine Research Management Plan - Draft, N.H. Office of State Planning, January, 1989). Approximately 50% of the aerial surface of Great Bay is exposed as mudflat at low tide. The area of Stratham that drains into Great Bay is located in the north- eastern part of Town, and has an area of 690 acres (1.1 sq.mi.). Two streams drain this area: 1) Brackett Brook - which is not dammed and flows for 300 feet into Greenland at an elevation of 95 to 90 feet above MSL; and 2) Foss Brook - which flows freely for 1,000 feet, from an elevation of 80 to 70 feet, into Greenland. d. Winnicut River: Within Stratham, the Winnicut River sub-watershed is 2,070 acres (3.3 sq. mi.). As is true for the Squamscott River, the Winnicut River is one of the seven major rivers that empty into Great Bay. The Winnicut River originates at the southern tip of Stratham (at about 70 feet above MSL) and flows for only 100 feet before entering North Hampton. After flowing through North Hampton and Hampton, for a total distance of about 3.5 miles, the River flows back into Stratham for 0.8 miles. The .River then flows out of Town (at 35 feet above MSL) and back into North Hampton, Greenland and finally Great Bay. A nine-foot dam is located along the Winnicut River in Stratham to form the Winnicut Mills Pond (as depicted on Map B). The@Winnicut Rive'r is fed by seven free-flowing perennial tributaries which originate in Stratham and flow in an easterly direction: Thompson Brook, Willow Brook, Winniconic Brook, Marsh Brook, and three unnamed streams (coded as W-1, W-2, and W-3 on Map B and Table 1). 6 1 Thompson Brook: Starting at Lovell Road, Thompson Brook is at 160 feet above MSL. The Brook flows for about 3,000 feet and drops 70 feet before entering Greenland. The Brook reappears in Stratham for another 600 feet until it converges with Willow Brook at the Greenland town line. 2) Willow Brook: Willow Brook originates at Willow Brook Avenue at 90 feet above MSL, and flows for 3,500 feet to Thompson Brook at an elevation of 30 feet. 3) Winniconic Brook: Within Stratham, the Winniconic Brook is approximately 2,000 feet long. The Brook drops from 35 feet to 30 feet above MSL at the Greenland border. 4) Marsh Brook: Marsh Brook begins at Barker Road and flows for 4,000 feet, from an elevation of 60 feet, to the Greenland town line at 35 feet above MSL. Stratham's Winnicut River watershed also contains two man-made ponds: 1) Winnicut Mills Pond (previously cited) - which has an area of about 3 acres and is at an elevation of 35 feet; and 2) an unnamed pond (coded as W-Pl on Map B) - which covers about three acres and is at 75 feet above MSL. Table I Unnamed Perennial Stre Stream Location Length (ft.) Elevation (ft.) W-1 East 3,000 70 to 35 w-2 East 3,750 55 to 35 w-3 East 4,000 75 to 35 S-1 S-West 1,500 50 to 20 S-2 S-West 4,500 60 to 10 s-3 S-West 4,500 40 to 10 S-4 West 2,500 40 to 10 S-5 West 4,500 80 to 5 s-6 Central 5,000 70 to 45 S-7 N-West 2,500 15 to 5 s-8 N-West 2,750 40 to 10 S-9 North 6,000 150 to 50 Note: "Length" is the length of the stream within Stratham. "Elevation" is the stream's elevation, above mean sea level, within Stratham. e. Coastal: The Coastal sub-watershed is located in the southern part of Town and, as stated earlier, covers only 90 acres (0-14 sq.mi.). No perennial streams within Stratham drain this area. Table 2 - "Acreage of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas" - presents a breakdown of the acreage of floodplain areas, and poorly drained and very poorly drained soils within Stratham's five sub-watersheds. The areas f or muck 7 and ponded soils, both of which are classified as very poorly drained soils, are also inventoried. Table 2 Acreage of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas Regional Watersheds: Squamscott Winnicut Coastal Sub-Watersheds Squamscott Dearborn Great Bay Winnicut Coastal Poorly Drained Soils 1,422 193 173 720 50 Very Poorly Drained Soils 458 27 100 199 0 Muck 14 8 43 37 0 Peat 407 14 40 128 0 Ponded 17 0 0 34 0 Other 20 5 17 0 0 Floodplain 380 14 0 115 0 Map C - "Wetland Soils" - depicts the locations of wetland areas throughout Stratham. The soils information was acquired from the Complex Systems Research Center at the University of New Hampshire in February 1990. The soils delineation is based on field work, conducted by the USDA Soil Conservation Service, completed in 1985. Wetlands are defined as poorly and very poorly drained soils. Much of these wetlands are contained in Stratham's 100-year flood zones, which are depicted in Map D - "Flood Hazards and Bedrock Geology." Flood hazard boundaries are those shown on the Town of Stratham "Flood Insurance Rate Map" (effective date: May 17, 1989@, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In general, the 100-year flood zone surrounds the Squamscott River and the major streams throughout Town. Another large flood zone lies east of Rollins Hill in the southern part of Town. Development should be located away from wetlands and floodplains. The filling of and use of wetlands for building construction not only destroys wetlands and their benefits, but may also lead to groundwater contamination. Building within a flood zone may also reduce the flood- plain's capacity to absorb and retain water during periods of excessive precipitation and runoff. Moreover, in regard to building within floodplains, contamination may result from flooding damage to septic systems. Without specific flood-proofing design and construction, development within floodplains poses threats to public health, safety, and welfare. In accordance with N.H. Code of Administrative Rules (Wr 700), the Water Management Bureau (of the Water Resources Division, N.H. Department of Environmental Services (DES)) compiles data on all water users throughout t@he State that withdraw or discharge more than 20,000 gallons of water per day. According to the Bureau, the Town of Stratham presently has no major users of surface water. 8 r-O rrim @7' MS 7rT t7 a M W e t I a n d S o I I s T 44@ tF Zj Lr IT ctl:. zt 4C4t I a t e r o r I D _P_p _ -y,_ _jained Muck -- Map C Y e r y Poorly Drained Scale in kiles Peat -- 2/3 1 1/3 Very Poorly Drained Sources: Complex Systems Research Center, UNK; Ponded -- February 1990. Soils delineation based Very Poorly Drained on field work, conducted by the USDA Soil Conservation Service, completed in 1985. P r e I i in i n a r y D a t a - S u b j e c t t o C h a D g e . Y P I Prepared by the Rockingham Planning Drained Commission, May 1990. S R G Flood Hazards and Bedrock Geology Map D BPI Flood Hazards Bedrock Boundaries E "d "Thidubw4orahletHle diorke A gransdiffiw NW granite. (mew Oe9 d gabb Phic) OZk it O?OA D (Mdanwrphic) 005TOA( FA @ytkq: "r '=*ir - _ I= -d OZe r. tilr=b (nwitsmorphic) D GARTO Ur prepared by the Rockingham Planning Commission June 19% nce Sources: 'Flood Insure Rate Map, T- of Stratharn Rockingham County, New Hampshire; Emergency Management Agency, May 1989. a SpE Geological Map of New Hampshire: U.S F-kra Geological Survey/State Geo", 1986. 4, TANNOEPtftY CONDO. Cb BLUE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUAM STRAIMAM e PHEASANT suit CONDO: 40 0 RATHAIA GREEN 'Irc"i, Won. f "o, rA%TE) tI-1c RDEEN P 'p_FaR Ok Otter 11 ROAD- cr, 0 0- i@ sc... LONG HILL st e. r AL WWI ER TTI -ILL HILL REET DR. C oze 07-1f ID 0* y Oft' U, 0 0 ON 0 0 so Nut FIELD DR. in BARNER' 0 0 BOW CUT RDA- PAIS LAt 01 0Zk Val Off Ms "IN Z COUNT <* 4L,4 INAT.A. ^XL. Rol L 110@ e "ILL Roads Updated September 1988 DRURY CO by the Rockingham Planning Commission PLAINS RD. AR Ir TO BE CONSTRUCTED Prepored by KA 5 So.1h.o.t.1h N- H..01h- R.9,..., Plchh.ng INE 3 water Sf'W ILL EIt Ifter, N- Hattogh,ro 05033 J0yyUorV 1976 "Th. p,.V-dt, on of III. fild.-11y ..d.d ty,rd.9h a Fed:raj grant Iron, :he Dqp@.,Irnfrnf .1 --, on. Urb- 0OVIII Pmeftt, Under the ComptehtrUive Planft,nq A1%,3fGnC* Pf:qrom authorized by Sect,on 701 of the tto-hq Act of .94d, on,end.IJ e9 1000 0 000 2000 5000 linot suffineeffewpow- SCALE I Inch - 1000 Iw TON Potential Surface Water Supplies The two largest fresh water bodies in Stratham, Mill Brook and the Winnicut River, have a legislative classification for water quality of "B" which means they would, require adequate treatment before being suitable for public consumption. According to the 1988 New Hampshire Water Quality Report to Congress 305(b), Mill Brook and the Winnicut River are in compliance with the water quality standards set by their legislative classification. However, due to their small flows, and costs for treatment, these water bodies are unsuitable as a public drinking water supply within Stratham. For the foreseeable future, the most economical and practical source for a municipal water supply in Stratham would be from groundwater, which typically requires much less treatment, II. GROUNDWATER RESOURCES The term "aquifer" is herein defined as a geologic formation, or part of a formation, that is capable of yielding quantities of groundwater usable for municipal or private water supplies. Stratified Drift Aquifers Stratified drift aquifers are the most likely source of groundwater suitable for municipal water supplies. Stratified drift was formed by glacial material that was transported and deposited during the melting of the glacier. Its materials, ranging in size from sands to cobble gravels, were worked and reworked by flowing water and, as a result, are well sorted. They are loose and coarse in texture. These characteristics result in high porosity and hydraulic conductivity - allowing groundwater to flow through quite readily. Stratified drift aquifers have potential to yield large volumes of water to a well and are therefore prime sources of water for municipalities and other large-volume users. The grounawater resources of Stratham have been investigated by two federal agencies: the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Both of these agencies based their findings on the surficial geology of the Town. They assumed that areas in Town which contained stratified drift formations would yield the greatest amount of groundwater. The USACE classified southeastern Stratham as having an aquifer, which was defined as "an unconsolidated geologic formation containing a minimum of 20 feet of saturated permeable material, which will yield significant quantities of water to wells for public usage. Generally, this range is in the order of 150 gpm. per well" (source: Groundwater Assess ment Study for 50 Communities in Southeastern New Hampshire, USACE; September, 1980). Three years previous to the USACE report, the USCS also identified the same gener,al area of Town as having high potential to yield water. Wells located .1 within these areas should yield sufficient quantities of water to meet or augment supplies for municipal and/or industrial purposes" (source: Availability of Groundwater in the Lower Merrimack River Basia, Southern New Hampshire, J.E. Cotton, USGS; 1977). '40 In addition to the sources described above, the N.H. State Geologist Office has mapped the stratified drift formations of Stratham. The surficial geology maps for the Exeter, Newmarket, and Portsmouth USCS quadrangles were finalized 11 in 1987, 1988, and 1989, respectively. The stratified drift formations were identified as: .. glacial and post-glacial water-laid deposits"; and "stratified glacial sand and gravel". The latest and most reliable source of information concerning stratified drift aquifers is from the recent groundwater mapping program conducted by the USGS. The USGS has characterized Stratham as having 2three primary aquifer areas, each having a transmissivity of less than 500 feet /day. Transmissivity is the rate at which water is transmitted through a unit width of aquifer under a unit of hydraulic gradient. It is equal to the product of hydraulic conductivity and saturated thickness (source: GroundWater Resources of the Lamprey River Basin, Southeastern-New Hampshire; J.E. Cotton; U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4252; 1988). Complete information regarding these aquifer areas will be published sometime during 1990 as part of a water investi- gations report entitled: "Geohydrology and Water Quality of Stratified Drift Aquifers in the Exeter, Lamprey, and Oyster River Basins, Southeastern New Hampshire". The primary recharge areas of the aquifers described above are shown in Map E - "Aquifers". As previously described under surface waters, the N.H. Water Management Bureau compiles data on all water uses which withdraw or discharge more than 20,000 gallons per day. According to the Bureau, the Town of Stratham presently has no major users of groundwater. According to the Water Resources Division of the N.H. Department of Environmental Services (DES), 348 (bedrock) wells were reported as being completed between March 1984 and February 1989. The well log data is presented in the "Summary of Well Completion Report Data for the Town of Stratham", dated November 20, 1989, and is contained herein as Appendix 1. Map F - "Aquifers and Wells" - depicts the locations of 87 of these wells, which were mapped by the Water Well Board of the N.H. DES (denoted by circles). Of these, 38 are located within a stratified aquifer as identified by the USGS. However, every well was drilled through the stratified drift and into the underlying bedrock. The only gravel-packed wells depicted in Map F are located in the southwest corner of Town. This area contains a field of 8 dug wells, ranging from 17 to 20 feet deep. These wells were Exeter's original water supply (Skinner Springs), and have yielded as much as 200,000 gpd. Pumping from the Skinner Spring wells has recently been reduced by Exeter due to an apparent bacterial problem, but they still serve as an auxiliary supply for the Town. (Source: "Town-wide Water Supply Report; Stratham, New,, Hampshire"; Dubois & King, Inc.; January 1989.) Bedrock and Till Aquifers The N.H. Department of Resources and Economic Development, in cooperation with the USGS and the State Geologist Office, has mapped the surficial geology of Stratham. This information is depicted in three maps (located at the State Geologist Office in Durham, N.H.) entitled: "Surficial Geology of the Portsmouth/Kittery Quadrangle, Rockingham County, N.H.", G.J. Larson, 1989; 'Surficial Geologic Map of the Newmarket Quadrangle, Rockingham and Strafford Counties, New Hampshire", M. Delcore and C. Koteff; 1988; and "Surficial Geology of the Exeter Quadrangle, NH-MA", G.D. Gephart and J.P. Schafer, 1987. 12 M M41m M M Map E Aquifers Stratified Drift Aquifers U.S.G.S., TrammissivitY < 5W feet squared/day X i U.S. Army Corp it ROAV J.E. Cotton,"U.S.G.S. /00 New Hampshire State G-lO&t 8ART E CAI OCT IM &U prepared by the Ro&jftham Planning Commission 00@ June 1990 1 .@ Sources: Surrig@ MePortsunssuth/ 1r4 47)@ and Newntorket(1998) =(Ii'ies; Rodingharn County, N.H.; New Hampshire 1404D Ck k" Rate Geologist Office *Gfoundwater Assessment Study for 50 cognmunki in Southeastern N.H.", 6 Is U.S. Anny Corps of FAtRiMtM; 1980- IIA,anability of Groundwater in the Lower TURNBERRY Merrinnitell: Valley River Basin, Southeastern CONDO. N.H.', J.E. Cotton, U.S.G.S.; 1977. "Geohydrology and Water Quality of Stratified -Drift Aquifers In the Exeter, Lamprey Oyster River Basins, Southeastern N.H.", U.S.G.S.; 1990. R _15 OLUIE RIDGE CIRCLE V OTI SOUANIPSC -@F z STRATHAM uREE",N DO. ----- - pRIATE) JE.F 17 HILL 0 0, RD S x r E , Bt *HIT' T@Atixn (WL Ep- R iLLC 0 C In 0. 0 -:: - ON -0 01 hut J, FIELD DR. to Tn In .4 fill 113 0 0 OXBOW CUT 0q `#0A1 FRYING PAN LAqt As 101 It- on .0000 0 sit 09 C < TRAI.Am 4 Z ## 14 HILL is Roads Updated September 1988 DRURY FA by the Rockingham Planning Commission PLAINS IPR '1@0q@OMWW MD. -.-.-TO BE CONSTRUCTED Prepared by KA Southeastern No, Hamp9h,le Regional Planning Conim-o, PINE 3 water street HILL E.. let, No. Hampshire 03833 JOAUCry 1976 "The Preparation .1 this map od. t,.ahc,.Iiy aided In-gl, a Federal giant from In. Department of Hou-9 and U ban 0tivill0offient, Under the Comprehensive P lonn,rg Ass Stance Program outho,litild by Section 701 .1 the H-1.19 Act .1 1954 .1 amended 1000 0 1000 2000 5000 In. - ummwAmmmmlg- - SCALE I inch - i0oo tool Map F Aquifers and WeRs T stratifled Drift Aquifer Private Wells RAIL 40 Public Wells. BOSTON 8 AFAINE 47 49 FX-1 Exeter Well Field SkD 52 w 2 ART 04 Prepared by the Roddnha- PMDuing COmn"a"on June 1990 E203 4w 0 Sources: -GeohydraiM and Water QualitY Of Strsdfw64)rift A"I"'fers"' the Exeter, Lamprey, am! OY$tei RJ- Blasia", S.Issbeakern N.H.", 46 U.S.G.S.; 1"0. 90 ?E7 Board, "Summary So state of New Hampshire Water Resourfel of Well Completion Report Dais f- the T- of Strathlurd", 17, 52 November 190119. M503 State of New Hampshire Water Supply Ealgineerift Bureau, fittr f\1 18 1 4 supply & Pollution Control Division. Dept of Enviremental TURNBERRY Services: "Public Water System inventory", Juse 1988. CONDO. 16 010 t 321 701 4'"IdE SOU@MPSCOTT R STRATHAM CIRCL-E ILL k NT Rup, C Co 2DO 0 MATHA14 GRE ONDO. C", as (P E) ABER 01 Cr ROAD'- .118205 HILL .,1, 0 204 4014P 4 Ac.... e-2 LONG "I RD M AL DFL B804 -'GoI TREET MLL 1 28 14 610 F DR. 9210 57 209 V 0 C @pe 803 to 62 0 zo- 50. o 0 - o yl.@ 0 Z: FIE 0 605 502 Yn a- in 36 Vn G 41 19 39 19 J OXBOW CUT 65 ROAD FRYIft' Po's LAN, 602 601 40 3 w 70 606 66 71 40 029 21 02D7 'J'A 609 084 0 WOOD 0" 06 OnfIVE 300 <+ C' Ip 9 VE IN ?"AM 'b LAI r RIII L.%'@ lk 78 262 24 77 Roads Updated September 1988 DRURY 76 by the Rockingham Planning Commission PLAINS Q' RD. iV14 TO BE CONSTRUCTED Prepared by KA Sftuthffl).tell No- HaffloSh- Rito-al Plan-9 Com-s- PINE 3 water Street "ILL E-1.1, New H..P.h- 03933 JOnuary 1976 "Th. OI.P.101- at th.. map .., fi.a.11all, a.d.6 thlougr, a FlId.'al grant from In. Opd-.. Of tio-ng and U ban I) ... IdIs.e.t, ..a., In. Ca-.1temsiv. P-n.rg *....,a... Program auth-iied by seci.on 701 Of the "o-Ig Act Of 12 p: 1954 as amended 4000 0 .000 2000 3000 bw , - - -6 ....... w 611 SCALE I nco, - 1000 fw 0 'A 0,W p TON, The surficial geology maps contain information regarding the location and extent of glacial (stratified drift), swamp, and till deposits. Till contains material of many different grain sizes, which results in limited porosity, transmissivity, and hydraulic conductivity. Given these qualities, till formations would not be suitable for municipal supply wells. Hence, these areas have not been delineated in this plan. The bedrock geology of Stratham was determined using the "Geologic Map of New Hampshire", V.S. Geological Survey/State Geologist (1986), prepared at a scale of one inch equals approximately four miles. As previously stated, all of the 87 wells depicted in Map F have been drilled into bedrock. In addition, the fault lines of different formations are shown in Map D, "Flood Hazards and Bedrock Geology". Stratham has three general types of bedrock: 1) Eliot Formation (OZe): gray to green phyllite, quartzite and quartz mica schist and well-bedded calc-silicate (metamorphic). 2) Kittery Formation (OZk): phyllite and calcareous siltstone (metamorphic); and 3) Exeter Pluton (Oe9): proxene and pyr oxene-hornb lend e diorite and gabbro, with minor granodioute and granite. Appendix I includes a list of well log data for Stratham. Map F depicts the locations of 49 wells (mapped by the N.H. DES) that are located outside of the stratified drift aquifers previously identified. Each of these wells are drilled into bedrock at depths ranging from 60 to 655 feet. Discharges from these wells ranged from 1 to 100 gallons per minute. (It should be noted that, on the average, stratified drift aquifers yield larger volumes of groundwater than do bedrock aquifers.) Potential troundwater Supplies Groundwater is a very valuable resource for the Town of Stratham. It has the potential to provide the Town with drinking water for many generations to come. However, the resource is vulnerable to contamination or depletion if not properly managed and protected. Groundwater quality can be impaired by a variety of materials. Sources of ground- water contaminants include landfills, commercial and industrial wastes, agricul- tural fertilizers, human sewage, road salting, etc. Groundwater quantity is reduced by contamination of available grou ndwater supplies, over-pumping in the aquifer zone, and increasing impervious surfaces such as roof tops and parking lots, thereby preventing recharge of the aquifer. These threats to groundwater are discussed further herein (see Section III). During recent years there have been several reports published regarding the development of a water system in Stratham. The most current, and detailed, study was performed by Dubois & King, Inc. dated January 1989 and titled Town- wide Wat,,er Supply Report, Stratham, New Hampshire. The Dubois & King report focused on three aquifer areas as being the most likely sources for a municipal water supply: 15 1 The aquifer area in the northeast part of Town which contains Stratham Hill and the "Gifford property"; 2) The area along Bunker Hill Avenue, which is Stratham's largest aquifer recharge area; and 3) The area along the Exeter town line, which contains the Skinner Springs well-field. The only groundwater quality information that is currently available, and has been taken from an identified aquifer area, is from the Skinner Springs aquifer. As previously stated, eight dug wells are located within this area. The water quality of these wells was tested by the USGS as part of the USGS Water Investi- gations Report (previously cited). In terms of inorganic constituents (e.g., chloride, manganese, iron, etc.), the water from this site proved to be of high quality. However, as mentioned earlier, these wells have experienced some bacterial problems. In general, the only water quality problem that may be present in Stratham's other aquifer areas (other than bacteria) is elevated concentrations of iron and/or manganese. According to a 1981 groundwater study performed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, naturally occurring iron and manganese constitute the most common groundwater problems in the Seacoast region (source: Southeastern New Hampshire Water Resources Study - Groundwater Assessment; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division; March 1981). As far as is known, humans suffer no harmful effects from drinking water containing iron and manganese. However, both iron and manganese interfere with laundering, impart stains to plumbing fixtures, and cause difficulties to water distribution systems by promoting iron bacteria and forming precipitates (source: Chemistry for Environmental Engineering, Third Edition; C.N. Sawyer and P.L. McCarty; McGraw- Hill Book Co.; 1978). Seven public water systems are located within Stratham's aquifer areas. Other- wise, the groundwater within these aquifer areas is primarily used for private homes. However, every water supply well for which data is available (from the Water Supply Engineering Bureau and the Water Resources Division) has been drilled into bedrock, rather than the stratified drift overburden. Given the extent of vacant land within Stratham's aquifer areas, and the Town's development rate during the past 10 years, there is high potential for these aquifer areas to undergo further residential and commerical development. The following is a brief description of the potential type of development within the Town's primary aquifers, and is based on Stratham's Zoning Map and the Future Land Use Map of the 1985 Master Plan. (See Appendices TV and V for aquifer locations relative to zoning districts and future land use recommendations.) - The Stratham Hill aquifer is zoned as residential, with a large portion zoned for manufactured housing. The Future Land Use Map of the 1985 Stratham. Master Plan recommends no change in the zoning status for this area. - Virtually all of the Bunker Hill aquifer is zoned as residential. The exception is a 40-acre strip that lies along the eastern side of N.H. Route 101 (the dimensions are approximately 2000' x 800'), which is zoned as Prof essional/Residential - - The zoning of this area is consistent with the Future Land Use (FLU) Map. However, the FLU Map depicts much of the Bunker Hill aquifer as containing "medium density residential". Hence, the Town's Master Plan promotes a higher density of development over most of the 16 aquifer area* Until Town officials can fully assess the aquiler's pote " tial as a municipal water sour ce, the Master Plan should not recommend greater development densities in this area. The Skinner Springs aquifer is zoned as residential, and is depicted as such in the Future Land Use map. The Town should continue to closely scrutinize and monitor development within its aquifer areas in order to prevent potential groundwater contamination or depletion. In the meantime, the Town should identify its most critical aquifer areas and protect them accordingly. The Dubois & King report (previously cited) recommended that: "...any further water resource evaluation be directed first at determining the adequacy of the stratified drift deposits on the "Gifford" property [contained within the Stratham Hill aquifer] as opposed to the bedrock to provide a suitable water supply. Further evaluation might include revision of the existing data base to include the most recent work [USGS and State] as it becomes available. [The USGS expects to publish information regarding Stratham's aquifers sometime during 1990.] Meanwhile, a subsurface test well program aimed at better defining potential aquifer characteristics should be conducted leading to the installation of a test pumping well to determine the various yield and water quality parameters so that maximum safe pumpage rates can be estimated relative to water supply needs." The report's recommended minimum yield for a municipal well is 100 gpm (source: Town-wide Water Supply Report, previously cited; p-41). It should be noted that the Dubois & King report used preliminary USGS estimates to assume that the Stratham. Hill ay Bunker Hill aquifers had transmissivity values of 0-1000 and 1000 to 2000 ft /day, respectively. As mentioned earlier, US5S,S final transmissivity estimate for Stratham's aquifers is "less than 500 ft /day". Since Dubois & King overestimated the potential water yield of the Stratham Hill and Bunker Hill aquifers, their recommendations may need to be changed, or expanded to other potential aquifers. Stratham's most practical source for future water supplies is from its aquifers because of their accessibility and relative purity. It is therefore necessary for the Town to protect its aquifers by enforcing measures which will promote groundwater recharge and reduce the risk of contamination. This course of action will help to safeguard an excellent source ,of drinking water for the future residents of Stratham. III. POTENTIAL THREATS TO WATER RESOURCES Potei@tial Nonpoint Pollution Sources A. Within Stratham 1. Existing Potential Pollutant Sources: Nonpoint sources of pollution involve the diffuse discharge of wastes from sources that are widely spread, difficult to identify, and hard to control. Nonpoint pollution is typically produced from land runoff during times of rain and snowmelt. 17 4W@ The following is a general list that briefly describes potential non- point pollution sources, and their associated mitigation techniques, within the Town of Stratham: Table 3 Nonpoint Pollution Sources and Remedies Source Remedy subsurface sewage disposal replacement and/or relocation; agricultural runoff and best management practices, e.g., concrete infiltration manure pits, no winter manure-spreading, etc.; road salt storage and salt sheds, decrease salt to sand ratio, application emphasize mechanical snow removal using plows, graders, etc., reduce frequency of application; increase use of calcium chloride and other de-icing chemicals; storm runoff from construction erosion control measures e.g., haybales, sites silt fences, straw mulch, etc.; storm runoff from parking lots catch basins which trap grit, oil and/or grease; sediments from silted-in maintenance programs catch basins and detention ponds application of fertilizers integrated pest management, e.g., soil and pesticides to farmland, testing, biological pest control, timing gardens, and lawns. of lawn care, etc. runoff/leachate from junkyards drainage collection/ treatment systems, and abandoned landfills and proper disposal of hazardous materials, e.g. battery acid, gasoline, etc. with a certified hauler; leaking underground storage remove abandoned tanks, monitor and tanks regulate existing tanks; roadside application of insecti- biological pest control, e.g., use of 0 cide for mosquito control non-toxic insecticides such as bacteria which attacks mosquito larvae. In 1982, the Water Supply and Pollution Control Division (of the N.H. Department of Environmental Services (DES)) published a report entitled: Inventory of Groundwater and Surface Water Potential Nonpoint Pollution Sources. The report's scope covered most of 'Strafford and Rockingham counties. Stratham was cited as having the following potential nonpoint pollution sources: 18 Pesticides: Stratham participates in the Seacoast Area Mosquito Control (SAMC) program. After flooding events, SAMC crews spray a biological pesticide ("BTI") on salt marshes and, to a lesser extent, freshwater wetlands throughout Town. The pesticide contains bacteria which attacks mosquito larvae. Biological control of larval mosquitos has much less potential for adverse health impacts than spraying adult mosquitos with a synthetic and more toxic insecticide (e.g. , Resmethrin). However, Resmethrin is also used along roads to kill flying adult mosquitos. Salted Roads: Stratham contains several roads that are subjected to substantial winter salting (e.g. , Routes 101 and 108). Road salting should be minimized within the Town's aquifer areas. Agricultural Runoff: Within Town there are many areas of tilled farmland and two dairy farms that are either located adjacent to a perennial stream or to the Squamscott River. Without the use of Best Management Practices (e.g., manure management, etc.), these areas may impact surface water (and groundwater) quality. Solid Waste Disposal: The Town Dump is located on the west side of Union Road. This site is presently used for the disposal of brush and demolition debris, and for the collection of scrap metal which is trucked out and recycled. The dump was closed to household waste disposal in 1980, after about 30 years of service. The dump is unlined, but the Town has been gradually capping the site with clay (and then covered with loam and seed). There is no closure plan for the dump, however, a recent Kimball- Chase study has identified four locations around the site to place monitoring wells. The dump was the only waste site identified in Stratham by the State's Waste Site-Inventory (source: Waste Management Division of the N.H. Department of Environmental Services, September 1987). The Town's dump is located in the eastern portion of the Bunker Hill aquifer. However, according to the Dubois & King study (Town-wide Water Supply Report, previously cited), the drainage from the dump site is toward the east - away from most of the aquifer's remaining area. Salt Shed: A salt storage shed is located at the corner of Frying Pan Lane and Bunker Hill Avenue, next to the Town's Public Works shed. (It is located within the Bunker Hill aquifer.) In 1982, it was estimated that this shed contains 100 tons of salt during the winter. other potential nonpoint pollution sources within Stratham, but not identified by the 1982 DES inventory, are described below. Pesticide Application: As of July 1989, the N.H. Department of Agriculture has a record of 13 sites throughout Town where pesticides are applied. All pesticides should be applied according to best management practices as prescribed by the Rockingham County Conservation District. In addition, "integrated pest management", using biological pest control, should be considered for these sites. 19 Underground St orage Tanks: As of November 1989, the N.H. Department of Environmental Services had identified 20 underground fuel storage tanks, at ten sites throughout Stratham. The capacity of these tanks range from 500 to 10,000 gallons, while the ages range from three to 28 years. Detailed data relative to tank location (by street address), owner's name, tank number, capacity, type of product stored, and the tank's age is presented in Appendix III, "Inventory of Underground Storage Tanks." The underground storage tanks within Stratham are single-walled and have no leak detection systems. All of the tanks are constructed of asphalt-coated steel. As of June 1990, the Planning Board has seen a preliminary proposal for a convenience store/gas station to replace an existing service station (see Appendix III, C&E Service Station; coded as #1 on Map G). If the existing underground storage tanks are replaced, the new tanks should be constructed with the most leak resistant materials (e.g., fiberglass) and should be equipped with a leak detection system. The sites described above are depicted in Map G - "Potential Pollution Sources". Areas of active farmland are depicted in Map 10 of the 1990 Open Space and Recreation Plan. In addition to these nonpoint source pollutant categories evaluated by the 1982 Inventory, excavation sites are also of concern. Stratham contains a total of four gravel pits within the Bunker Hill aquifer. Substantial excavation poses a potential threat to an aquifer's water quality. By removing the aquifer's cover soils the site's capacity to filter pollutants is reduced. This problem may become acute if development is located in this area, and groundwater quality is threatened by poorly treated septic system effluent. In general, when protective layers of earth material are stripped away, the ground- water is lef t more vulnerable to contamination (e.g., a site with an exposed water table being contaminated by fecal wastes from animals). Moreover, when earth is excavated too close to the water table, flooding problems can ensue from unusually wet years and high water tables. The last type of nonpoint source of contamination that is noteworthy is radon. An important reason to map bedrock types relates to the issue of radon in groundwater. Radon contamination has recently become a concern throughout the U.S.. Radon is a colorless, odorless, cancer- causing gas produced as uranium (typically occurring in trace amounts) decays. This gas escapes from water once it is brought up from the g r ou-nd .For example, when a shower is used in a home with radon-containing water, radioactive gas diffuses into the air. Hydro- geologists at UNH's Department of Earth Sciences report that water from deep, bedrock wells is more likely to carry radon than water from shallow wells or those in gravel deposits. Several years ago New England was surveyed for its susceptibility 't-6 radon using remote sensing techniques. A map was produced from this project entitled: "Generalized Bedrock Geologic Map of New England with Emphasis on Uranium Endowment and Radon Production," (W.J. Olszewski, Jr.; UNH, 1986). Around this time, the USGS drafted a map (unpublished, but available for inspection at the State Geologist Office) showing the uranium concentration in rocks throughout New 20 Map G Potential Pollution Sources Aquifer Boundaries Covered Salt Pile PAIL ROA V Underground Storage Tanks VoSrON 8 Town I)ump Closed Pesticide Application Sites ;1 101 Heavily Salted Roads Sh L,arge Community Septic @51 Systems Prepared by the Rockingham Planning Commission June 1990 Y Sources: "Geohydrology and Water QualkyolStratifled-Drift Aquiferdft',@, TLIRNBERRY in the Exeter, lAmprey, and Oyster River Basins, Southeaste 16NDO. N.H.", U.S.G.S.; 1990. 7 "Waste Site inventory", Waste Management Division, N Department of Environmental Services, November 19 "Inventory or Groundwater and Surface Water R + OLUE RIDGE CIRCLE IX SOUAPAPSCOT' SIRATHAM Non-Pointpollution Sources", N.H. Dept. of Envii 0 Services, February 1982. HI L L LUn 0 vtrg=d,tr=Tank Information", Pic Dept. o RUN , December 1"9 ,-/ X -Pesticide Application Sitm-, Agriculture// Complex Systems Research. X \0 4C 0 SMATHAIA GREEN ON C", 'PRO" DO LIN ADERDEEk DR. IEWFII HIL L o /* 10 S" LONG to RD Sr BALMORAL EPS %WIT R CONDO. D HILLC STREET .40 41 41 % a a rRIC ON !!fa LIS LIE 0 Z, 0 FIELD :-a X rn V0 0 OXBOW CUT ROO 1 X FftyING Ph" LAME 4, As 04 94 es 4, VFW 11-1114, WOOD 0, DRIVE coule Ave '.AT... 4 MILL Roads Updated September 1988 DRURY by the Rockingham Planning Commission PLAINS (PR, CO-,V,O RD. 1 V4 rt, Is - TO BE CONSTRUCTED Prepared by KA 75 Sd.Ih ... t.rh Me. ma,hp.h- R.9i.r.1 Pi.nr,.g C--,- PINE 3 Was., Street MILL E Me. Moplh,,. 03633 J. ... ly 1976 "Th. t'h '.. y .d.d th-91, -:rd P'S h: D-P- .F.0.,d1p9,drI lr:@ th , 7rm h7l ..I.' p.6 Urts- D-:1.0.01:1 .r"."d:1 pth*5 COMP10kentIV I P""', P'. r :h . y - I_ 701 a, he .0.-9 ACI .1 1954 as arro'Ised 1000 0 1000 2000 5000 6= ummommmo@ - - - SCALE I rIch - 1000 fe.1 Hampshire. In April, 1989, the State Geologist devised a "radon susceptibility rating" system for the bedrock types in the region, based on the probability of radon occurrence. This rating system ranged from "Very Low" to "Very High". The bedrock types listed above and shown on Map D have been rated as follows: OZe = Medium OZk = Medium Oe9 = Very Low 2. Future Potential Pollutant Sources a. Near Term - As of June 1990, the Stratham Planning Board did not approve any plans for residential or nonresidential development that could be considered a future potential pollutant source. b. Long Term 1) Surface Water - Two significant streams (Parkman and Mill brooks) flow through commercial areas along Route 101 shown in the Stratham Zoning Map and Future Land Use Map. When reviewing future commercial development along these streams, runoff from paved and other impervious areas should be considered as a potential source of nonpoint pollution. Fortunately, Stratham has recognized the need to protect its surface waters. Section 12 of the Zoning Ordinance - the Shoreland Protection (Overlay) District - requires that a setback be maintained between perennial streams and development, with a vegetated buffer. However, even with shoreland protection, the northwestern parts of Stratham's industrial district pose a significant threat to the Town's only Class A surface water - Dearborn Brook. The peripheral areas of the industrial district contain both Dearborn Brook and the wetlands that drain into the Brook. The consequences of contamination occurring in this area would be serious, considering that Dearborn Brook is a component of Exeter's municipal water supply. For these reasons, Stratham should move the boundaries of its industrial district away from Dearborn Brook. This would be a relatively slight change, on the order of about 500 to 1000 feet. 2) Groundwater - As previously discussed (in Section II), certain aquifer areas are zoned as commercial or are recommended for medium density residential development (see Appendices IV and V). Runoff from commercial sites can be sources of nonpoint pollution to groundwater. In addition, the Town should consider community septic systems from cluster developments, or large commercial systems, as being threats to Stratham's aquifers. It is therefore imperative that the Town collect more information to assess the groundwater potential of its aquifers, and ultimately adopt an aquifer protection ordinance to safeguard the water quality of designated aquifer areas. 22 B. Contributing Areas Outside of Stratham 1. Surface Water a. Existing Potential Nonpoint Pollutant Sources The Town of Stratham is unique in that virtually all of its streams and rivers flow out of Town. The exceptions are the Winnicut River and the Squamscott River. The Winnicut River flows into eastern Stratham from North Hampton. The North Hampton portion of the River is surrounded by undeveloped woodlands, fields, wetlands, and some low-density housing (1 to 3 acres per dwelling). No potential threats to the Winnicut River have been identified in North Hampton. The Squamscott River is fed by surface waters from the towns of Exeter and Newfields (in addition to Stratham). As with the Winnicut River in North Hampton, the Squamscott River corridor (within 1000 feet of the River) contained by Newfields and Exeter consists of woodlands, fields, wetlands and some low-density housing. Even though no nonpoint potential threats to the Squamscott River have been identified in Exeter or Newfields, both towns have municipal sewage treatment plants. However, these plants are considered to be point pollution sources and are discussed further herein. b. Future Potential Nonpoint Pollutant Sources Without a shoreland protection ordinance, North Hampton's portion of the Winnicut River is vulnerable to contamination from any development that encroaches on the River. Hopefully, North Hampton will heed the recommendation of its Master Plan which promotes the adoption of a shoreland protection ordinance. The Squamscott River, on the other hand, is protected in both Exeter and Newfields by shoreland protection ordinances. 2. Groundwater Stratham's primary aquifer areas lie almost entirely within the Town's borders. Two small areas that overlap into the towns of Greenland and Exeter are depicted in Map G. The Stratham Hill aquifer overlaps into a residentially-zoned area of Greenland. And Exeter's portion of the Skinner Springs aquifer is protected by the aquifer protection ordinance as amended at the 1990 Exeter Town Meeting. Hence no potential threats from surrounding towns to Stratham's aquifers have been identified. Point Pollution Sources A. Within Stratham Information provided by the Water Supply and Pollution Control Division in 'May 1989 indicates that there are no permits issued in Stratham. under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for surface water discharges. Information provided by the Groundwater Division in May 1989 indicates that three permits have been issued in Stratham for groundwater discharges, 23 under the N.H..Code of Administrative Rules (Ws 410). All three permits have been issued for the community septic systems (leach fields) of residential cluster developments, as depicted in Map G. Table 4 - "Groundwater Discharge Permit Holders" - provides further details regarding the conditions of these permits. Table 4 Groundwater Discharge Permit Holders Map G Development Effluent Effluent Design Code - Name Location Type Volume (gpd)- A Turnberry Squamscott Domestic 30,000 Condominiums Road Wastewater B Stratham Green NH Route 108 Domestic 18,000 Condominiums Wastewater C Montrose Hersey Lane Domestic 18,900 Condominiums Wastewater Only the leach fields from the Montrose Condominiums lie within or near Stratham's primary aquifer areas. B* Contributing Areas Outside of Stratham Great Bay is periodically restricted or prohibited from the taking of shell- fish due to bacterial counts in excess of the 70 coliform bacteria per 100 milliliters standard for such waters. The pollution problems of Great Bay, and the Squamscott River, stem primarily from the municipal sewage treatment plants operated by the towns of Newmarket, Newfields, and Exeter. These treatment plants are depicted in Map H - "Principal Point Pollution Sourc es to the Squamscott River and Great Bay." The following is a brief review of the plants' operating conditions and possible improvements as described in the Interagency Report-on the Shellfish Waters of New Hampshire (by the Water Supply and Pollution Control Division, N.H. DES; February 1989). 1. Newmarket This facility lacks adequate sludge dewatering equipment. This may affect effluent quality in the near future and impact on the plant's capability to properly disinfect due to solids carryover. It is recommended that adequate solids handling, dewatering, and disposal equipment be installed. Further, dechlorination should be considered. 2. Newfields This facility is underloaded and has good treatment; however, the automatic tide clock designed to control discharge on the outgoing tide has never worked properly. With four NPDES coliform violations during a 15-month period in 1988-89, there is a need to assess the contact tank baffle configuration to assure*effective*kill'over varying conditions. 24 PRINCIPAL POINT POLLUTION SOURCES TO THE SQUAMSCOTT RIVER AND GREAT BAY Map H =Treatment Facility Sewered Area L ,07 N C w 4 -IF CAT"A E IlLtS OF $140ALS rT 0 0 4-) 0 ID f., A,44S -A.- _!Let_ .ta-eshi re Mass. Ntw "AMPS"WE 0"%Cr OF SUTE PLAN-"G 066 25 3. Exeter Although improvements have been made to this system, it has been inadequate for waste water loadings and has been occassionally out of permit compliance. A major upgrading (i.e., expansion of lagoon capacity, chlorination contact chambers, etc.) has recently been completed and should result in an adequate facility. In addition, the towns of Newmarket, Newfields, and Exeter have a problem that is common throughout New England: combined sewers. Hence, during heavy rainfalls, the sewers become overloaded with street runoff. When the total volume of wastes becomes larger than the treatment plant can. handle, some of the wastes are allowed to overflow and go untreated into the Squamscott River and/or Great Bay. To reduce this undue sewage loading, these communities should work toward separating their combined sewers (the Town of Exeter has recently received an EPA grant for this purpose). If the recommendations above are carried out, public health will be protected and shellfish resources will be restored for Stratham and surrounding communities. IV. GROWTH IN DEMAND FOR WATER Pr6jected Growth in Demand for Water In June 1987, the Water Management Bureau, of the N.H. Department of Environ- mental Services' Water Resource Division, initiated the Water User Registration and Reporting Program. The objective of the program is to gather accurate data on the major uses of the State's water and the demands placed upon aquifers, streams, and rivers. To accomplish this objective, all facilities that use an average of 20,000 gallons (or more) of water per day must register with the Division. According to the Bureau's latest list (October 1988), the Town of Stratham has no users of 20,000 gallons of water per day. Stratham's most current and thorough water supply study was performed by Dubois & King in January 1989 (previously cited). The study evaluated the Town's present and future demand for water. According to the study, the Town will have an abundant water supply available from individual private wells for the next 5 to 20 years. The Dubois & King study projects Stratham's population to be 6,707 by the year 2000. The following excerpt taken from this study briefly explains the Town's future demand for water. It is very probable that by the turn of century the additional 95% p"eople from 1985 (6707/3440) will result in a more congested Town and much more intense commercial activity along Route 101. Experience in other growing areas confirms that this trend may eventually impact some of the wells in the more densely populated areas making a public water system more desirable. It is useful to look at the ultimate water needs of the Town to serve the growing population. The numbers in Table [5] show that an average daily production of [1,165,800 gpd] would be needed to serve the entire 2010 population (150 gpcd) and adequate storage would be needed to meet the peak hourly production need of 1327 gpm. These estimates 26 include allowances for light commercial/industrial needs, leakage and seasonal flushing. Of course, no water system in the region is required to serve a Town's entire population. There will always be those outlying residents whose wells are safe and adequate and who do not require service. More important especially in the short term, there will be sparsely developed areas in Town where water system extensions are not economically feasible" Table 5 - "Projected Water Demand" - compares the Town's projected water needs using the population projections from both Dubois & King and the N.H. Office of State Planning (1987). Table 5 Projected Water Demand Population Average Daily Production Need (gpd)* Year A B A B 1990 5348 4122 802,200 618,300 1995 6097 5133 914,550 769,950 2000 6707 5992 1,006,050 898,800 2005 7284 6827 1,092,600 1,024,050 2010 7772 7522 1,165,800 1,128,300 A = Dubois & King study (1989) B = N.H. OSP (1987) * ADPN = 150 gallons per capita per day The lack of detailed data on water usage makes it extremely difficult to break down the water demand by each sector, i.e., residential, commercial, industrial, and agric-ultural, within Stratham. The water demand for the non-residential sectors will be entirely dependent upon the types of commercial, industrial, or agricultural uses that locate within Stratham. and whether or not they will be water-intensive uses. At this point, all of the Town's industrial uses, located at the Strath.am Industrial Park, are connected to the Exeter water system. It is assumed that the residential water demand will account for the majority of Stratham's water usage during the next 10 to 20 years. During this time, the Town's water demands will primarily be met through the use of private wells. An important concept presented in the Dubois' & King study is the potential of using private community water systems, which currently exist, to contribute to a municipal water supply sometime in the future. The study stated that most community water systems (of cluster developments) have deficiencies that make 'them'undesirable as part of a municipal system. These deficiencies include: reduced well protection radius (200 feet instead of 400 feet), distribution pipe sizes that are too narrow, and lack of fire protection capability. However, 1. the wells for Glengarry, Salt River, Balmoral, and Pear Tree have some potential for. contributing to -a municipal supply because they are all well protected with up to 400 feet potentially available around the wells" (source: Town-wide Water Supply Report, previously cited). But connecting these systems to a centralized one might be expensive given that they have relatively small yields and are all a good distance from the denser commercial area and Town Center along Route 101. 27 This section regarding Stratham's future water demand and supply, would not be complete without mentioning the water supply study performed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, in December 1988. The study, entitled New_ Hampshire Route 108 Water Supply_Study, was requested by the N.H. DES to provide them with a basis for evaluating the concept of providing a regional water supply along Route 108. The communities included in the study area were Exeter, Stratham, Newfields, Newmarket, Durham, Madbury, Dover, and Somersworth. The water supply alternative described in this report is a pipeline along Route 108 with the Lamprey River as the water supply source. However, considering the expense of storage, treatment, and distribution for this water supply alternative, Stratham should exhaust its options for developing a local ground- water source before investing in this or any other regional water supply project. V* INFRASTRUCTURE A. Septic System Usage Using 1988 OSP population estimates, approximately 4,453 residents are served by septic systems. Stratham has no municipal sewer system and is not planning on developing one in the near future. However, the Stratham Industrial Park and Stoneybrook Lane are connected to Exeter's municipal sewer system. According to the N.H. Housing Finance Authority, approxi- mately 345 acres are sewered in Stratham (as of October 1988). Occassional septic system failures have occurred throughout Stratham. In 1989 there were four or five failures, whereas during an average year one or two failures are reported. Stratham. has a high potential for growth in its number of septic systems. Given the expense of wastewater treatment facility construction, and the diffuse development pattern in much of Town, it is probable that all future development (during the next 10 years) will be served by septic systems. However, Stratham's Subdivision Regulations prohibit septic system construction in areas where the seasonal high water table is within 24 inches of the ground surface. In addition, Stratham's Zoning Ordinance prohibits septic system construction within 75 feet of a poorly drained soil, 100 feet of a very poorly drained soil or perennial stream, or 150 feet from Great Bay, Squamscott River, or tidal wetlands. These rules will limit the placement of septic systems to areas of Town with relatively good soil conditions. B. Soil Potential Ratings Using national standards, virtually all of Stratham's soil types have re- ceived a "severe" rating for septic system development. In f act, there are only a few soils throughout Rockingham County that are not classified as having "severe" limitations for septic system development. In light of this, the Rockingham County Conservation District and the USDA Soil Conservation Service developed a more meaningful set of land use guidelines based on soil types. In May' 1987, the "Sbil Potentials for Development - Rockingham County" manual was published by the RCCD. Five soil potential classes were provided: very high, high, medium, low and very low. Low and very low potentials are assigned to those soils having severe soil limitations, with costs of design measures extremely high or prohibitive. 28 Map I - "Soils Suitability for Septic Systems" - depicts the general areas of Stratham that have different soil potentials for septic system develop- ment. Soils with low and very low potential were mapped because they had limitations due to steep slopes or high water tables (as well as high shrink- swell properties, short depths to bedrock, and stoniness). C. Solid Waste Disposal The Town of Stratham is a member of the Lamprey Regional Solid Waste Cooperative, which was formed in 1978 under RSA 53-A. The Town operates a dump, located on Union Road (depicted in Map G), which was "grandfathered" prior to the 1981 permitting process of RSA 149-11. The dump is used to dispose of brush and demolition debris, and for the collection of scrap metals to be recycled. Household wastes are picked up by private haulers (contr,acted by the Town) and trucked to the Town of Durham for incineration. In terms of household hazardous wastes (e.g. , batteries, lead paint, pesticides, solvents), Stratham residents can dispose of these at the annual Household Hazardous Waste Collections organized by the Rockingham Planning Commission. This facility has no existing permit violations. As discussed earlier, there is no closure plan for the dump; however, a recent Kimball-Chase study has identified four locations around the site to place monitoring wells. Additionally, the Town has been gradually capping the site with clay and, as part of a future closure plan, the Town may consider placing an impervious lining under the dump to collect its leachate. D. Public Water Supply Map F shows the location of 43 public water systems, all of which draw from groundwater. Of these systems, 13 are defined by the N.H. Water Supply Engineering Bureau as "community" systems. The remaining 30 wells are ., non-community" systems. The information contained in the Dubois & Kings study (previously cited) indicates that the existing public water systems will be able to meet their water demands for the next 5 to 20 years. Nevertheless, the study recommends that the Town meet with town officials from Exeter to determine the feasibility of obtaining a short-term water supply, as well as an emergency connection at Route 51. E. Publi'c Waste Water Treatment As with Exeter's municipal water, Stoneybrook Lane and Stratham Industrial Park are the only areas in Stratham that are serviced by the Exeter municipal sewer system. Otherwise, there are no public waste water treatment facilities in Stratham. In the future, Town officials should .consider discussing, with Exeter officials, the possibility of extending Exeter's sewer lines to Stratham's commercial area and Town Center along Route 101. 29 0 W n 67 7 17 r =a tol amm m m ml S o 1 1 S u I t a b I I I t y f o r S e p t i c S y s t ems 7- r=W I I L =F 7 71 E-EW F11 If a t e r Very Loy Map I Suitability L 0 w Scale in Miles Suitability 2/3 1/3 M e d i um Sources: "Soils Potential for Development-Rockingham County"; Suitability U.S.D.A. - Soil Conservation Service and Rockingham County Conservation Dist.; May 1987. Complex Systems Research Center, UNH; February High Suitability C) 1990. Soils delineation based on field work, conducted by the USDA Soil Conservation Service, completed in 1985. Preliminary Data - Subject Very High to Change. Suitability Prepared by the Rockingham Planning Commission, May 1990. SRG Not Rated/ Too Variable Overall, since much of the development in Town is spread over a wide area, it would be economically unfeasible and undesirable to develop a municipal sewer system that covers a large portion of Town. Hence, it is important that natural resource information, especially soils type, be utilized in order to assure the continued safe and sanitary on-site disposal of the community's sewage. VI. EXISTING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES Each ordinance and regulation in Stratham was reviewed for the purpose of identifying the elements of each that have the potential to impact on any of the following eight water resource parameters (WRP): 1) Erosion and sedimentation; 2) Surface water flows; 3) Groundwater recharge; 4) Management of existing and potential contaminant sources; 5) Flood storage; 6) Encroachment on wetlands; 7) Nutrient levels; and 8) Wildlife and fisheries habitat. Zoning Ordinance a) Sanitary Protection Section 5.2-3: Requires that sewage disposal facilities be designed according to State (and Town) standards. In addition, no septic system can be located within 71 feet of a well, 100 feet of a water body, 10 feet of a road ditch line, or on a slope exceeding 15 percent (WRP #4 and 7). b) Cluster Development Section 8: Encourages development that requires less consumption of rural and/or agricultural land and requires that sensitive areas (e.g., areas subject to flooding, and/or with high water tables) be avoided (WRP #4, 5, 6) 8). c) Excavation Article 10: Requires site reclamation '-to prevent erosion, and prohibits excavation that would substantially damage a known aquifer (WRP #1, 3 and 4). d) Wetlands Protection Article 11: Restricts the use of and encroachment on local wetlands that have been identified as poorly or very poorly drained soils using the standards of High Intensity Soil mapping for New Hampshire * This ordinance is based on a model orditianee' developed by the Soil Conservation Service. The intention of the ordinance is to accomplish the following selected purposes that relate specifically to water resources: 31 To prevent the destruction of natural wetlands which provide flood protection, recharge the ground water supply, and augment stream flow during dry periods (WRP #1, 2, 3, 5, and 6); To control the development of structures and land uses on naturally occurring wetlands which would contribute to pollution of surface and ground water by sewage (WRP #1, 4, 6, and 7); and To preserve wetlands for other ecological reasons such as those cited in RSA 483-A (WRP #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8). The Stratham wetlands ordinance has the potential to impact each of the eight water resource parameters. e) Shoreland Protection Article 12: Restricts the use of and encroachment on local shorelands of perennial rivers or streams, or tidal wetlands. Selected objectives contained in this ordinance that relate specifically to water resources are as follows: To promote the preservation and maintenance of surface water quality (WRP #1, 2, 4, 5, and 7); and To conserve and protect aquatic and terrestial habitat associated with intertidal and riparian areas (WRP #8). f) Special Exceptions Section 15.8.2(5): Requires that there be no excessive demand on municipal services, including water and sewer (WRP #4). This is one of the six standards that must be met in order for the ZBA to grant a special exception. g) Floodplain Management Section 16: Prohibits encroachment, from fill or new construction, that results in any increase in the 100-year flood levels (WRP #5); provides construction standards for buildings and septic systems within the 100-year floodplain (WRP #4). Subdivision Regulations a) Procedures for Subdivision Approval Section 2. 3.2(d) and (e): Requires high intensity soils information and data on test pits and percolation tests (WRP #4 and 7). b) Data Required for Subdivision - Section 3.3.2(h)l: Requires an explanation of any Tdrainage easemelftts (WRP #2). - Section 3. 3. 3: Requires that subdivision plans depict the locations of existing and proposed curbs, gutters, drainage easements, manholes, catch basins, sewers, stormwater drains, fire hydrants, and water 32 lines. Other existing features include septic systems, drains, wells, water bodies, and wetlands (WRP #2 and 4). Section 3.3-4: Requires calculations specifying the quantity of stormwater run-off, with adequate drainage facilities (WRP #1 and 2). c) General Principles and Standards for Subdivisions Section 4.2-2: States that land subject to flooding or poor drainage shall not ordinarily be subdivided (WRP #2 and 5). Section 4.2.4: Requires that wetlands and watercourses be preserved as much as possible (WRP #1-8). Section 4.3: Requires that lot sizes meet the area standards based on soil types, for adequate on-site sewage treatment (WRP #3, 4, 6, and 7). Section 4.4.6: Allows the Planning Board to require drainage studies and corresponding drainage facilities to accommodate surface run-off (WRP #1 and 2). Section 4. 4. 11: Provides local standards for septic system construction; and a hydrogeologic study may be required for any development with significant sewage loading within the Bunker Hill aquifer (WRP #4 and 7). Section 4.4.13: Requires that subdivisions involving flood hazard areas be reasonably safe from flooding (WRF #4 and 5). Section 4. 4. 14: States that an erosion and/or sedimentation control plan, and/or temporary vegetation or mulching may be required by the Planning Board (WRP #1 and 4). Section 4.4.15(b): States that the Planning Board may require a drainage easement of at least 25 feet (WRP #2). Section 4.5-2: Establishes design standards for storm water drainage, and detention, systems (WRP #2 and 5). Site Plan Review Regulations a) Application Procedures and Requirements Section 4.2.2(d) and (e): Requires high intensity soils information and data on test pits and percolation tests (WRP #4 and 7). Section 4.3.1(d), (e), (h), and (1): Requires that site plans depict the locations of watercourses and water bodies, drainage systems, and the 100-year floodplain (WRP #2 and 5). Section 4.3.2(e) and (k): Requires that site plans depict fhe proposed locations of all water lines, sewage facilities, drainage structures, and erosion and sedimentation control methods (WRP #1, 2 and 4). 33 Section 4.3.2(f) and (1): States that the Planning Board may require a storm drainage plan, with stormwater run-off calculations, and may require information on the type and quantity of waste water generated. b) Design and Construction Requirements Section 5. 3: Requires that an adequate surface storm water drainage system be provided, and specifies design standards (WRP #2 and 5). Section 5. 4: Requires that development involving f lood hazard areas be reasonably safe from flooding (WRP #4 and 5). Section 5.12: States that an erosion and sedimentation control plan, with specific provisions, may be required by the Planning Board (WRP #1 and 4). Building Ordinance Stratham's Building Ordinance contains no provisions that specifically have the potential to impact water quality or quantity. Health Ordinance The Town of Stratham does not have a health ordinance per se. However, there are many ordinances and regulations which pertain to public health, e.g. standards for septic system design. In addition, the Town has an appointe@ Health Officer, a Building Inspector, and a Septic System Inspector, all of whom assist in the administration of these local health-related laws, as well as State regulations in accordance with RSA 147. VII. ANALYSIS Analysis Regardiug Water Supplies Virtually all of Stratham is served by individual private wells. It is assumed that the vast majority of Town will continue to be supplied by private wells for at least the next 10 to 20 years. However, as previously described (in Section IV), the trend of intense commercial- ization along Route 101 may make a public water system desirable. The likely area to be served by a municipal system would be the denser commercial area and Town Center along Route 101. The Town of Stratham appears to have at least three potential sources for a future municipal water system. These options (described more fully -in Section IV) are listed below: 1) Drill wells into the Town's primary stratified drift aquifers (e.g Stratham Hill, Bunker Hill, or Skinner Springs) or into high-yieldin*@ bedrock fractures. 2) Through an inter-municipal agreement, have Exeter extend its water lines along Route 101. 34 3) Pursue the concept of a regional water supply using the Lamprey River. (This option seems the least likely of the three.) Analysis Regarding Other Water Resource 11urposes a) Discharges: There are no significant sources that discharge wastes into the Town's surface water. Therefore, there is presently no need to determine the "assimilative capacity" of Stratham's surface water resources. However, as cited in Map G, the Town contains three large community septic systems that are classified as point source discharges to the Town's groundwater. One of the greatest long-term concerns of the systems is the plume of nitrate-laden effluent that flows from them into the groundwater. For these systems, as well as proposed systems, the 11 assimilative capacity" of the groundwater should be determined. The assimilative capacity is basically the capability of the subsurface strata within the parcel boundaries to dilute the effluent to acceptable contaminant concentrations (e.g., 5 to 10 mg/l nitrate nitrogen). b) Recreation: Relative to other towns within Rockingham County, Stratham has many streams and rivers. The Town also contains an extensive shoreline along the Squamscott River and some along the Great Bay. Water-related recreational activities include shell and fin fishing, boating, swimming, and skating. In 1111, the N*H* Office of State Planning published a study entitled: "Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers for New Hampshire." Out of 67 other rivers being classified throughout the State, the study classified the Winnicut River as a "Recreational River" (and the Squamscott River as a Scenic River"). The study defined recreational rivers as those: which provide outstanding recreational opportunities in natural surroundings. These rivers should be protected for their natural qualities which can provide for a wide range of active and passive outdoor recreation activities. Recreational rivers should: be readily accessible,; have high water- quality; have enough water to provide for fishing and canoeing; and be at least five miles long. The Squamscott River and Great Bay are the most suitable waters for boating. Canoeing is particularly popular along the Squamscott River. Stratham has two public access areas: Chapman's landing along Route 108 (owned by the N.H. Fish and Game Department), and the Town Landing at the end of River Road. Since the Town-owned landing has such a limited area (2 acres), the Town should investigate acquiring additional land or conservation easements around this site. At present, there are no waters within Stratham that have sufficient volume, quality, and/or access to be suitable for public swimming. All water-related recreation requires high water quality for an ideal experience. Poor quality affects the safe enjoyment of water recreation and impairs its aesthetic appeal. Stratham must safeguard its surface water quality, particularly that of the Squamscott River and Great Bay, fn order to provide the opportunity of sports fishing, boating, and swimming for present and future townspeople. C) Wetlands: Wetland types fou nd in Stratham include shrub swamps, shallow and deep marshes, meadows, and forested swamps. Lands with soil having a high seasonal water table, and classified as poorly or very poorly drained 35 soils by the USDA Soil Conservation Service, are also considered to be wetlands. Wetlands are important, valuable, natural resources and worthy of protection from inappropriate use. They have been found, in general, to provide critical ecological and socially valuable functions, including: 1) provide habitat and reproduction areas for plants, fish and wildlife; 2) help maintain ground and surface water levels; 3) act as flood water storage areas; 4) absorption and filtration of pollutants and sediments (caused by up- stream erosion); 5) provide opportunities for recreation and education; 6) contribute to scenic values. Many of the wetland areas in Stratham are adjacent to rivers and streams. Significant areas of wetlands are located in the following parts of Town: east of Stratham Heights Road; along Parkman Brook; between High Street and Long Hill; along the Squamscott River and Great Bay; and just south of Stratham Hill. The latter area contains an important White Cedar Swamp. Located adjacent to the new elementary school, this wetland can provide many educational opportunities for Stratham students. The salt marsh along both sides of the mouth of the Squamscott River represents approximately one half of all the marsh in the Great Bay estuarine system - over 400 acres (source: Great Bay. National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan - Draft; [email protected]. Office of State Planning, Concord, NH; Jan'uary 1989). This complex of extensive salt marsh and adjacent farmland is prime habitat for migratory waterfowl. In addition, four rare and endangered plants have been identified in this area by the N.H. Natural Heritage Inventory (see 1990 Open Space and Recreation Plan, Section IV.D, for further discussion). The filling of and use of wetlands for building construction not only destroys wetlands and their benefits, but may lead to groundwater contamin- atiorf as well. Leaching fields constructed in filled areas are likely to be placed too near the seasonal high water table below and to have an inadequate receiving layer for proper treatment of the septic system's effluent. There is an ongoing need to protect wetlands in Stratham. Statewide, wetlands are under increasing development pressure due to the depletion of the most developable land. Although the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the State of New Hampshire have laws and regulations governing wetlands, they do not always provide the degree of protection needed. Existing regulations look at each dredge and fill 'request as a separate application, resulting in a piecemeal approach. In addition, the inadequate number of federal and State inspectors means that some wetlands are not sufficiently protected. A local wetlands ordinance enables the community tc protect wetlands in a Town-wide context. Unlike State and federal rules, local regulations can give the Town control over the location of structures and septic systems in relation to wetlands. For these reasons, local Mntrol over the use of wetlands should remain in effec:t indefinitely. The Town of Stratham. has recognized the importance of preserving wetlands, and has acted accordingly by establishing a Wetlands Conservation District ordinance. 36 d Fisheries: The Winnicut River, Squamscott River, and Great Bay are the most commonly fished water bodies in Stratham. These rivers, as well as Jewett Hill Brook, and the Bay are currently being stocked with anadromous fish by the N.H. Fish and Game Department as part of a Statewide restoration program. This program involves stocking the rivers with game fish such as rainbow trout, river herring, American shad, steelhead, brown trout, salmon, and eastern brook trout. Stratham must safeguard its surface water quality in order to provide the opportunity of commercial and recreational fishing for both present and future townspeople. e) Wildlife Habitat: River, stream, and wetland corridors provide the richest habitat for the greatest number of fish, wildlife, and flora. Fish and wildlife populations cannot succeed within a limited range, and waterfowl and other birds need ground-level nesting habitat. Protection of these linear corridors is essential to the stability of wildlife populations. Riparian corridors (i.e., shorelands) also contribute much in terms of recreational benefits, i.e., canoeing, hiking, fishing, birding, horse trails, cross country skiing, picnicking, etc. Shorelands are also sensitive due to flooding, erodibility, and proximity to open water. More- over, soil type and percent slope typically limits the development potential of a shoreland area. The Great Bay Estuary provides prime habitat for many wildlife species. According to a N.H. Fish and Game study, more than 90,000 birds reside in the estuary (source: Inventory of the Natural Resources of -Great Bay Estuarine System; N.H. Fish and Game Department; December 1981). Thousands of Canada geese and black ducks rest and feed in the fall. Osprey are common in the spring and fall migration. Three rare and endangered animal species that live within in the estuary include the bald eagle, common tern,-and the common loon. In addition to excellent coastal habitat, Stratham also has important inland habitat areas. Examples include: wetlands; river and stream corridors; forests such as coniferous, hardwood, and mixed woodlands; and open lands comprised of meadows and fields. These habitat types support a wide range of animals including game species such as deer, coyotes, raccoons, rabbits, and pheasant. Stratham's prime wildlife habitat areas include the Squamscott River corridor and an extensive tract surrounding the Winnicut River. f) Hydropower: There are no hydropower dams in Stratham, nor are there plans for any in the future. The hydropower market is not as strong as it was ten years ago (during the height of the nation's energy shortage) because of uncertain markets for electricity, environmental restrictions, and alter- .native power sources which are more economical. Harnessing hydropower is not always benign to the fish, animals, and people that use the impacted river. Hydro development can result in the loss of productive habitat, degrade water quality, and cause direct mortality of 'fish (especially juvenile fish traveling downstream) and other aquatic organisms. 37 If any hydropower' facilities are proposed in the future, no decision should be made by Town officials until a thorough site review and evaluation is performed. The cumulative impacts of hydropower dams along the river should also be considered. g Fire Protection: Stratham's Subdivision and Site Plan Review Regulations enable the Planning Board to require fire safety facilities, such as fire ponds and dry hydrants. Historically, the Board has required at least one fire pond and dry hydrant within or adjacent to a large development. Considering the regular occurrence of wetlands throughout Town, development engineers have had no problem locating areas suitable for fire ponds. h) Conflicting Uses: The principal conflict that exists between competing uses involves Great Bay, which receives waste water flows from the municipal sewage treatment plants of surrounding towns (i.e., Exeter, Newf ields, and Newmarket), and where recreational and commercial fishing takes place. This conflict could be mitigated by upgrading these treatment plants, and separating their combined storm sewers, and discouraging significant increases of sewage loading to the Bay. Management of Potential Threats Section III, "Potential Threats to Water Resources", presents a full discussion of existing and permitted future land uses that pose threats to water resources within Stratham. A brief discussion of Stratham's primary potential threats to identified water resources, including mitigation measures, is presented below. 1) Large community septic system : An advantage of cluster development is that facilities and utilities can be concentrated and centralized. However, this creates the potential for large community septic systems. These systems can generate large volumes of effluent in a relatively small area. Because of concerns regarding long-term maintenance, hydraulic mounding (i.e.-, induced water table rise), and groundwater contamination, the Town should discourage very large community systems (i.e., greater than 10,000 gpd). Rather, smaller systems should be separated by a specific distance that is proportional to the systems' design volume. As presented in Table 4, three condominium developments currently use large community septic systems. Their monitoring wells, as required by the N.H. DES, should be regularly and carefully checked. In this way, the homeowners associations and the Town will have ample opportunity to respond if a system malfunctions. 2) Town Dump: This facility is located within the Bunker Fill aquifer. As mentioned earlier (in Section III), it has been presumed that the drainage from the dump is toward the east - away from most of the aquifer's remaining area. Nevertheless, the Town may consider placing an impervious lining .under the dump to collect its leachate. Capping the dump with clay, which continues to be performed by the Town, will significantly reduce the leachate generated at this site. 3) Road Salting: Stratham contains tip. major., highways (e.g., N.H. Routes 101 and 108) that are heavily salted during winter months. Certain segments are located over parts of Stratham's primary aquifers (see Map G). Road salting should be minimized throughout Town, but especially along roads 38 that overlay aquifer areas. Road salt reduction methods are specified in the following section under "Nonregulatory Programs", #8. 4) Salt storage: The Towns salt storage shed is located within the Bunker Hill aquifer, Even though this facility is covered, Town officials should closely monitor potential leaching effects on the aquifer. If necessary, this site should be relocated. 5) Agricultural runoff: Areas of tilled farmland can be found throughout Town. Also, two major dairy farms are located west of Routes 101 and 108. Farmers should employ Best Management Practices (promoted by the Soil Conservation Service) for manure, herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers in order to minimize agricultural runoff that could be harmful to surface and groundwater resources. 6) Pesticide application: Thirteen sites throughout Town have been, and continue to be, sprayed with pesticides. In addition to using Best Management Practices, "integrated pest management" using biological pest control should be considered for these sites. 7) Underground storage tanks: Twenty active or abandoned underground petroleum storage tanks have been identified and described in Appendix IV. While all of these should be considered potential risks to water resources, one of these tanks, located at site 5 (see Map G), should be of particular concern because it lies within the Stratham Hill aquifer. Further measures to manage underground storage tanks are described in section VIII. As a final note, most existing and future non-residential land uses, particularly those which use and discharge water, should be regarded as potential threats to surface and groundwater resources. Sites with failing septic systems should also be considered potential threats to water resources. Additional management and protection techniques for water resources are described in the following section. VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW OR REVISED POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Notregulatory Programs It is recommended that the Town of Stratham employ the following nonregulatory programs in order to manage and protect its water resources: 1. Through hydrogeologic studies and pumping tests the Town should determine the viability of its identified aquifers (depicted in Map F) as future sources for a municipal water supply. 2. The Town should consider redefining the Industrial District, by moving its western boundaries east, in order to protect Dearborn Brook. The western-most part of the Industrial District also contains an aquifer area (as depicted in Appendix IV). 3. The Town should meet with Exeter officials to discuss the possibility of obtaining a short-term water supply, as discussed in the 1989 Dubois & King study (previously cited). Stratham officials should also determine 39 the feasibility of Exeter extending its water lines into Stratham along Route 101. 4. Educational and informational programs should be developed in order to provide the general public with an understanding of the operation, proper use, and maintenance of septic systems and leach fields (i.e., regularly pumping out septic tanks, avoiding disposal of hazardous or harmful wastes, e t c - )This would likely prevent unnecessary system contamination and failures, thereby protecting surface and groundwater resources. 5. Develop a septic system inspection program, especially for primary aquifer recharge areas, in order to ensure that these systems are adequately maintained. 6. Continue to promote and participate in the annual Household Hazardous Waste Collection, sponsored by the Rockingham Planning Commission. For past collections, Stratham's share of the costs was funded directly by the Town. 7. Continue to appropriate money for land acquisition to be used .for the protection of land and water resource conservation areas. There are generally five different methods for protecting these natural areas: a) Land Purchase; b) Option of Right of First Refusal; c) Purchase and Resale; d) Bargain Purchase; e) Easements - Conservation Restrictions and/or Purchase of Development Rights. Conservation funds enable the Town to act on short notice when a valuable parcel of land is threatened. This land may be of critical importance for protecting significant wetlands, shoreland, wildlife habitat, or recre-ational areas. 8. The Conservation Commission should also seek land acquisition funding through State and Federal grants (e.g. Trust for New Hampshire Lands, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and the Pitman-Robertson Fund through the N.H. Fish and Game Department). 9. The Conservation Commission should work with people who own land having conservation potential by promoting the tax incentives associated with the donation of land or easement restrictions. The Current Use Assessment Program also provides tax abatements on parcels of 10 acres or more or on "natural preserves" of any size. 10. The Stratham Planning Board should work with theIr counterparts in surrounding towns to promote land use planning practices that are mutually ,beneficial to protect the Squamscott River and Great Bay and common watersheds, wetlands, and aquifers. Stratham may choose to develop inter-municipal agreements (pursuant to RSA 53-A) to protect these shared resources. During the 1989 session, the N.H. Legislature approved Senate Bill 161 which authorizes agreements between municipalities to_develop water resources management plans. 40 11. Continue and enhance the Town's program to reduce the amount of road salt used, especially in aquifer recharge areas. The following methods should be employed: a) Emphasize mechanical snow removal; b) Mix sodium chloride with calcium chloride and/or sand to reduce the total amount of sodium chloride applied; c) Periodically re-calibrate salt spreaders so that they apply the correct. amount of salt/sand mix; and d Post areas where reduced salting is practiced, which will encourage drivers to reduce speeds and drive more cautiously. This program should be adopted for both Town and State-owned roads. In the meantime, the N.H. Department of Transportation should be notified of the Town's desire to reduce road salting within its primary aquifer areas. 12. Develop a program to inspect and maintain drainage control facilities, (e.g. catch basins and detention ponds, and culverts) throughout Town. If these devices become filled with sediment, they can no longer perform their function. 13. Develop a program emphasizing water conservation. Using less water may increase the efficiency and useful life of individual sewage disposal systems throughout Town. 14. Encourage farms and pesticide users to employ Best Management Practices (BMP's) as prescribed by the Soil Conservation Service. BMP's include storage of manure in concrete pits, and more efficient and better timed application of fertilizer and pesticides. 15. Develop a water quality data base for monitoring contamination events in both surface and ground waters throughout Town. 16. The Planning Board should be kept informed by the Rockingham Planning Commis- sion regarding the availability a-ad appropriateness of regional or State water resource data. 17. The Great Bay estuarine system has been designated as the Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Great Day reserve is one of 17 throughout the country. The research reserve system is a non-regulatory federal program that emphasizes research, education, and land protection. The Office of State Planning has provided the initiative in establishing the program in New Hampshire, although once under full implementation, the State Fish and Game Department will assume program responsibility. Another organization committed to conserving the land and water resources of Great Bay is the Great Bay Estuarine System Conservation Trust (GBESCT). The GBESCT is a private, non-profit citizen's group whose membership is drawn largely from the Seacoast area. Although originally organized as a, local land trust, the GBE8CT also has worked to protect water _quaLity, as well as air quality and critical marine habitat. In order to promote the protection of the Great Bay Estuary, the Town should work with the abutting landowners, the Office of State Planning, the GBESCT, 41 the Water Supply and Pollution Control Division, the Fish and Game Department, the Rockingham County Conservation District, and the Rockingham Planning Commission on wise land stewardship of the watershed. The costs of instituting these nonregulatory programs are expected to be vari- able, but relatively low. For example, any assistance provided by the Rockingham Planning Commission is either at reduced cost or no cost, as part of Stratham's annual membership in the Commission. The most expensive programs include hydro geologic studies and land acquisition. Costs associated with land conservation efforts involving donations of land and easements would involve survey, legal, and recording fees. The outright purchase of these lands or the purchase of development rights would obviously entail substantially greater costs. Household Hazardous Waste collection and disposal costs, which can be expensive even, in a regional program, may in the future be covered by the dues paid to the Lamprey Regional Solid Waste District. Matching funds are available from the Waste Management Division of the N.H. Department of Environmental Services. Virtually all of these nonregulatory programs could probably be carried out by existing voluntary and paid manpower. It should not be necessary to hire additional personnel to conduct or supervise any of these activities with the possible exception of #2, establishing a septic system inspection program. Hydrogeologic studies, however, would require contracting with professional consultants. Regulato-ry Programs The Town of Stratham. enforces a building ordinance, a zoning ordinance, sub- division regulations, and site plan review regulations. All have been reviewed and found to contain provisions specifically pertaining to water resource protection-(except for the Building Ordinance). All options for regulatory programs (required by the State's Administrative Rules for water resource plans) were considered, and the following new or revised regulatory programs are recommended in -order to improve and/or enhance existing local water resource management and protection mechanisms: 1. An aquifer protection ordinance should be adopted by Stratham to protect its primary aquifers - the Stratham. Hill, Bunker Hill, and Skinner Springs aquifers (depicted in Map F). As previously discussed, these areas warrant further water resource evaluation to determine their viability as municipal water supplies. 2. Eros-ion and sedimentation control regulations should be adopted by the Planning Board. These regulations provide standards and guidelines for ,development planning, for the purpose of controlling erosion and preventing sediment transport to wetlands and streams. The Rockingham County Conserva- tion District has developed a model ordinance which the Town could use as a starting point. Stiatham should develop its own Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations. Requirements to be considered are as follows: a) Require the removal of all abandoned tanks; 42 b) Ban all new underground heating oil tanks with a capacity of less than 1,100 gallons. These tanks need not be registered with the N.H. Water Supply and Pollution Control Division, thereby making them diffi- cult to monitor and regulate; c) Amend the Site Plan Review regulations to require development plans to identify the location, type, content and capacity of each proposed inground petroleum and chemical storage tanks in order to maintain a current inventory- The N.H. Water Resources Action Project has developed other such guidelines which Stratham could use to develop and administer a local UST regulatory program (source: "Guidelines for Controlling Underground Storage Tanks", Tools for 'Community Water Supply Protection, N.H. Water Resources Action Project, 1985, prepared by Sharon F. Francis, N.H. Natural Resources Forum, Sky Farm, Box 341, Charlestown, NE 03603). 4. Large subdivisions and the associated roads and drainage facilities can have a negative impact on the environment, including water resources. The Subdivision Regulations should be amended to require an environmental impact study for large subdivisions to insure that the damage to the environ- ment is minimized. 5. The types of land uses reviewed under the Site Plan Review regulations may require large volumes of water. These uses have the potential to deplete other wells in the area relying on the same groundwater resource for their supplies. Therefore, if a proposed land use requires large water supply volumes, the following information should be required: a) The on-site location of the proposed well, its expected yield, pumping duration and quantity (maximum) of water withdrawn; b) Subsurface groundwater conditions (e.g., saturated thickness, direction of groundwater flow, etc.); c) Location of abutting water supply wells, amount of water being pumped, and maximum capacity needed; d) Effect of proposed use on abutting water supplies. 6. Amend the Subdivision and Site Plan Review regulations as follows: a) Promote the use of catch basins designed to trap oil and sediments; b) Encourage road designs that require less use of de-icing chemicals (e.g. roads with minimal slope and/or turning radius, etc.); c) Require that runoff be retained on-site and that no degradation of water quality shall occur. This will provide for groundwater recharge through the infiltration of retained water. This provision will also safeguard abutting properties from increased flows which can cause flooding and erosion damage. 9. The Stratham Conservation Commission should consider mapping and documenting prime wetlands as authorized under RSA 483-A:7, and subsequently recommend their adoption as part of the Zoning Ordinance in accordance with RSA 675:3. The State of New Hampshire Wetlands Board is required to give special consideration to prime wetlands during the review of dredge and fill permit applications. Generally, the cost of preparing proposed amendments to regulations and ordi- nances is minimal. Technical assistance can be provided at low or no cost by the Rockingham Planning Commission or the Rockingham County Conservation District. There would be some expense involved with complying with the statutory 43 requirements for the publication of hearing notices. The Town should not need to hire any personnel for the preparation of the proposed amendments to regu- lations and ordinances- Unless the members of the Conservation Commission possess certain technical qualifications relative to the mapping and identification of wetland areas or can obtain voluntary assistance from qualified residents, some funding may have to be budgeted for training or the provision of limited technical assistance for prime wetlands mapping. Since the goal of the surface and groundwater portions of this Plan is to assure that local land use decisions resulting from this planning process are based upon the most comprehensive and reliable scientific and technical information available, it is important that all implementing ordinances and regulations include: (1) a process that allows applicants for local approvals to present documented scientific and technical information which differs from the information used to prepare this Plan; and (2) mechanisms that would enable local decision makers to consider the scientific and technical information submitted by the applicants prior to making a final decision. 44 APPENDICES APPENDIX I Summary of Well Completion Report Data for the Town of Stratham APPENDIX II Public Water Systems Inventory APPENDIX III Inventory of Underground Storage Tanks APPENDIX IV Zoning Map and Aquifer Locations APPENDIX V Future Land Use Map and Aquifer Locations 5UMARY OF iJELL CWLE110f, REPW DATA FOR THE @s- OF SIRATHAM 6ft# MME ROAD PARCEL ELEV DUMP U$F R5N TYPE TOTC, B.DKO C-ASING YTM YID Y11. W, OVERBURDEN' T @165 3-501 P. 15 0-4, 77-IC5 1. 1,ii 00 861 46. -4 R. 1,11@@hroq Air, .-,I t App@e .-Ly 2 99, 611s ky:r.--y L--. 84 3 7 87" .13. [ILI 4 :71-5@@ K. Ea:ier Rc 86; 2 406-2"? D. (ook Barker Rd 90,0 115.00 2 1, 3D 0.50 J, 2 3 j,t at@ -t -c+e, - -,,- RJ ?1 -62 @,. :: -- 2 177-602 B. Roy [email protected] Rd :6 084; 1-;?-14 Sldrs t@:Ja-,:[, F., @T 330, 1774:1 631drs Ro 084 1: J 1 1 1 i4o 11 5. 00 :@G 3 "".01) Q19 i2 2 55@1 1?7-13 61Elcrs Ro 60.0 94/t 110 36.110 3@ 011 17 jE I J@, S 50.0 84,: tZ6 1 @7, K-O 94 '37 1 J.- .1-@ ?0.0 84,', RL -L! x 6 Ae 1,2.0 85 :17 @, - K' 6^037 177-25, K4rrieff,@ir Conocs r,f Bunker KII Ave 60.0 .84 /0.) 1 1 Z20.0 4.0- 21.00 3 8.0,1 1 2 06-691 Burkrid3e Hores Bids Banker Hili Ave 2 0 1 1 1 262.0 89.00 103.00 3 G-@o 2 88/-,9i221 1 1 260.0 40.00 60.00 3 8.GO 2 3 2 5.032@ lj?-919 R. Ritoel Bunker Hill Ave 138 3Q?I !77-112 Develco of Stratham Inc Buriker Hill Ave 120.0 180:419 1 1 1 235.0 21.05 62.30 3 1). 00 2-1 2 2 225.0287 177-746 C. Sewall Bunker hill Ave 97 2o0.0 30.00 73.M 3 41-00 3 5, G039 kOo-77 L. Cartonneau Bu6,er hill Ave .84 1 1 1 1711.0 to.00 3 9.60 225.C344 177-319 R. Riedel buniker hill Ave Lot IM $9i i!22 I 1 1 26D.0 W.OG W.93 3 9.M 2-4 2 125.0300 177-760 Ferro Structures off Bacnktr Hill Rd ""p/ :12@1 1 1 100.6 16.00 33.00 3 iGO-GG 4 2 225.0110 177-30 F. Eranuel Bunker hill Rd 37 1 1 100.0 25.00 42.00 3 18.00 12 2 Lr) 225.0214 177-576 SeaviE4 Bldr.- E--erf4elld L,i 17 1 &'6j t,1171 1 i 223.0 15.00 25.00 3 5.00 1-4 2 225@G,169 177-470 Reed & Small Butterfield In 23 6Y-6i23 1 1 1 130.0 35.00 72.00 3 15.00 4 2 I. 1 2 -.0198 M-523 R. Scaaan C.W.LfI Rd 2 08 1 1 1 40S.0 30.00 45.00 3 1.50 2 100.6 If4 16/29 1 1 1 160.0 12.GO 50.00 3 2 -5.0021 177-55 Erick Chapman Rd 10.00 3 2"5.0323 177-851 V. Crisp Coacn Rd Lot 3 1 1 1 200.0 15.00 28.00 3 60.00 3 2 2211.0130 177-440 1 Lavin Co Coach Rd 423 1 1 1 200.0 29.00 40.00 3 6.00 3 2 225.0181 r1acDonald Coach Rd /@'j/04 I 1 1 104.0 25.00 27.00 3 0.15 50.00 12 2 406-626 21;.0116 '177-394 D. Cook Coach Rd i5 I 1 1 120. 0 40.00 53.00 3 11-00 12-4 2 22c Peck Coach Rd 12 :@3/23 1 1 1 200.0 3O.D0 42.00 3 1.00 5.00 14 2 MI73 4:t-516 0 /:2/03 1 1 1 204.0 40.00 95.00 3 2.00 15.00 15.00 3 225.0118 3-4W W.t-stowell Coach Rd 8 2 YL 225.0217 406-M 84 Gerkin Coach Rd 7/62105 1 1 1 142.0 10.00 21.00 3 1.00 6.00 2 22'.9*72 ft. Assoc:&,es Coach Rd 6 1,S/22 I L 1 U2.0 52.00 6S. M 3 1.25 5.00@. 3 2 225.0223 06-M Pre Im Coach Rd I7JL5/18 I 1 1 282.0 47. 00 63.00 3 0.50 25.00 13 2 225.0178 1236-2 Lamprey Bldrs Coach Rd 2 R7125 I 1 1 185.3 15.00 21. M 3 1.00 10.00 1-14 2 225.0123 406-419 M. Associates Coac:h Rd it 1,428 1 1 1 120.0 32.60 Q.00 3- 1.50 5910P 2 2 225.0263 17i-691 Co@ch ad 17 7109/W 1. 1 1 16.0 12. 00 21.00 3 12.W 4 22S.DI27 457-86-46 T. Vandewter Coach Rd 12 -1, 1 225.0 60.00 74.00 3 1.00 Iq.qD 2-4 2 YL -850 Coach Rd ic,6/01 I 1 1: 7140.0 2 9. 00 225. OUI 177 h. Cook; Lot 13 S.00 50.00 3 4 2 157-86- 225.0146 4@ A. Oliveira (cacn Rd 4 1 1 1 300. 0 40.00 50.00 3 1.00 5.00 12-4 2 YL 225.0290 177-734 M 13 Mrs off Coach Rd Humes Ct 4 7/i,/14 I I 1 180.0 15.00 26.0D 3@ 30.00 2 2 '0/14 2 221.0281 177-736 M I J Mrs off Cox,. Rd alies, Ct 2 7,1. 1 1 UOkO,,, 30.00 65.00 3. 15.00 3 ountryfa@i 45.00 63.00 3@' 15.00 4 225.0326 177-869 R. Mal C L I 1 1 "160 21 ot 22 1: 1 .1 125.0 1. M 30.00 15.00 2 3, 225.0245 208-2554 Garneau Consf Country Farm s t 7/ 45.00 60.00 225.0241 208-2555 Garneau Const* Country Fare Est( - is'- 11 1' 1 1 la 0,:.1. 30.00. 40.00 3 1.00 9.00 .15. M 2 225.0282 177-757 J. Pearson County Fare Est 16 7,',.,/ioI 1 1 200.0 1 70.00 83.00 1 25.00 4 2 225.0220 406-785 F. McKenna County Farm Est 7/1L V25 1 1 1 IBM 44.00 60.00 3 1.00 6.00 1 2 7 '25.0233 -627 B. Brisow - 177 Cc@nty Fare Est 71'./17 1 1 1 120.0 30.00 48.00 3 10.00 3 2 21 J. Mccailojqh Crest View Ter -,@.O'K 406-598 V12 1 1 1 142.0 12.00 21.00 3 1. D3 60.00 5.00 12 2 's M min M M 225. 02 72 457-$5-37 j@ 6 1 - 2,1.. 8z 225.0104 406-356 j. rccullou@n C6nst Crtstviw Tc,7 1,-,2.0 11.06 ',!. 00 5C 225.0017 177-41 Frois ConsE Depot 5 Duntarton C&@ 1O.CO 2 2 1@ @I 1 120.0 8.00 21.CG , 177-150 Glengarry Condo off Depot Ro 1 1 300.0 5.00 23.GO 3 30.00 6 1 C4:06(6)ms@jle 225.0052 't @ -I C14 225.0053 177-151 Glerwry Condo oft Depot Rd 11 1]5;@ I I 1 505.0 5.00 27.00 3 30.00 6 1 4) 225.0054 177-163 Glengarry Condo off Depot Rd '00:0 5.00 27.00 3 25.00 3 1 60 225.0115 177-391 Perro Structures Depot Rd 1 1 140.0 MOO 31.00 3 10.00 2 2 0 225.0044 177-110 J. Schmartz Depot Rd 1 205. 0 jr 4.00 21.00 3 4.00 1 2 225. US 40b-246 D. Hamel Depot Rd 120.0 1' 1 150.0 15.00 21.00 3 1.50 6.00 2 2 240.0 15.00 25.00 3 5.00 3 225.0198 177-546 W. Saidla Depot Rd I I@ 2 225. W43 177-337 Swale.Corp, Depot Rd "100.0 14.00 3 40.00 2 2 225, U96 177-IU J. Dabney Depot Rd so .0 *14 1 1 1 1W.0 16.00 31.00 3 50.00 2 1 162.0 12.00 21.00 3 1.25 7.00 124 2 225.0175 406-5U A De@el Inc Depot Rd 19 5 1 M G. 74 457-Bo-108 0. Packard Depot F. J 21 A 200. a MAD 40.00 3 1.00 15.00 1 2 YL 225.0237 177-97 Americv Land Depot Rd Dxbwton Oaks 30 1 1, 100.0 18.00 31.00 3 100.00 1 2 225.0238 177-598 ker'can Land Depot RdiDunbarton Oaks 1 t 1@ 1 100.0 W. 00 64.00 3 100.00 1 2 215.31.4 204-6U 1. Farrell Doe Run Ln 62 1 1'' 100.0 50.00 60.00 3 0.2) 25.00 20.00 3-4 2 -P9 -se,)Id Realty Trust Doe Run Ln 1 140.0 12.OU 26.00 3 50.00 1 2 4o 225,0168 177-@O I. Bayer Doe Run Ln 28 1 1 100.0 50.00 63.00 3 100.00 1-4 2 225.0126 204-635 J. Farrell Doe Run Ln I -03 1 1 1 150.0 55.00 70.00 3 0.25 12.00 20.00 1-4 2 225.0321 2C.1-2659 Northern Devei Corp Drurg Plains Lot 7." 1,"161 ! 1 125.0 87.00 100.00 3 1.00 10.00 20.00 4 3 225.0157 177-502 Henry M. Construction Drury Plain Rd ii'15 I I 1 180.0 30.00 67.00 3 MO 1 2 221,0228 177-61.2 Lamprey Bldrs Drury Plains Rd 10 i16 I I I U0.0 70.013 90.00 3 25.@O 34 2 r5.0129 177-443 Rowg;an Kcaes Drury Rd 5 ..30 1 180.0 80.DO 90.00 3 W. 00 1 2 225.0345 177-326 DS G Const DurDarnton Cak@ Lot 31 '13 @ w I I I IaO.0 21.00 40.00 3 7 GO 4 2 MACK '@77-tl T. 'AcA 21 Dunbarton O@,s 50.0 1 1 1 80.0 15.00 3C 00 3 20: CO 6 -1 2 225.0CO 172-114 M. D-ake 22 Ounbarton 3a. L 30.0 :@4 1 1 1 180.0 15.00 21.00 3 20.00 1 1 225.KK 177-123 D. T1,.; L,,de= 23 Durmbarton @@<s 40.. 1 1 1 120.0 20. M @,1.00 3 15.50 1 1 225.GG51, 177-111 S. Sao,,r 29 Dunbarton 62KS 20 0' 8 1 1 1 205.0 15.00 35.00 3 10.110 1 1 2 '5.13023 177-oO G .c @ nd -1 buncytor. 'jKs I I 12G.0 5.',0 311,30 3 io.c@ 1-4 2 , 30.0. 221.0047 1 34 Dxoarton Ja@s 20.0 i 5 1 1 1 60.0 15.00 @6. C11, 3 75-0 1 1 @.0310 1177--2@ 0 & G C Lot @,2 1 1 143.0 40.@O 63. 0i. 3 A. O'D 4 2 225.0231 177-t"C Stra@nam @c.Ati 1, Dunwron s 23 1 1 1 120.0 3.00 20.0 3 @2.-C 1 2 ?25.0M i?7-@2@o ":.-atham ncz@- D@roar-m I I 1 110.0 1100 310.@G 3 ia.@G 1-4 2 i @ "I't 17-1-63@ 4 G Dvi3rm Lot 2; 2 1 1 1 140.0 25.20 42.00 3 15. 2 6 G C@n- Durbar:,-, '-a r, Lot -4 1 1 1 175.0 5.00 26.0C 3 to.00 4 2 5 -,,es 4-02,4 20 7 1 1 200.0 PCO 30.Co 3 ig. 24 2 i4 I I i 130. 0 211. 3C, 13. -2@ 3 2 r v i. CO 3 i 1 175.3 sc, "@c 1 2 luo 3- @7 106.6 -.er I 84 1 200. @O @c:nes 1 i 1GO.rj Z 0. 03 15- 3 il Ju 2 1,0111. 11 i U". Da 87@ 2i.00 "J.60 I C@rs: 50. a 10.60 "j. A. Cc 1 2 %o. 1 12.,30 2 1 9.00 40.0c, 2 n. 86 G 871 1 . "T @-, @: , :.@, 01 liw . 11 .. . . , :., . I @ . I ) 1 @ 416-774 Burvjo@, H.,meb G:,te@vomm Commons 2 1 31). 1, 0. @0 I LK. !11- .25.0,55 171-591 Sw3lf Cvp 6.,Irled 0 86/ i ltu@o 'D 30 3 3- :2 2 4',,t - bol,; C 1 1 1 871 6 i 7 4c.@ jr, 86i 861 85, t,j. j 1 X. (ra, 84 171- '.@Zaro it; ghl Ob [email protected] 1?7-188 Tt,irt lano 't t i @o 0 6 2-1 CL - 30. cl@ 6, 3 22 5. a-6i M-'121 R .SLammon He i gr I s a 120. 0 951 0 @0. Ob 12. U 2-4 2 25. 22214 177-04 C. Roga 11 ", i RQ 7 87; U. E . 55 2 221.0!54 177-499 S. Harrington He i ;,',t R.1 61 1 1 1 20,9 0 5100 t,2, 00 3 b.G5 2 2 125 1XI '.77-178 3. nerchant me: 9.1 R 3 12,0 1 1 1 u L;1.00 t, D 2 10 225 CIL 07-324 Ferro Structures ic t 1 1 i 2DO. 6 lo. 00 2 225.M2 177-312 Ferro Structjve@ @e v4 RD i 1103. 10 1 .00 12-4 2 [email protected] Corp -tc.o 45' 1 1 1 il@b 03 3 C1, :2,' . 3t @Ca, Chapi ar, ",-t. R, :)3.5 4 .0 1 Uj 1 !L 77-@4? D. Aackenzie F d 121.0 25 6 1 i ?0.0 3!.@6 5: T- -4 2 ftme '-.a-c 2 Ro 225.0098 M-296 R. Scamman heights R@ 6 BLr.','r h@ Il I I [email protected] @2.00 3 8.06 2 2 "25. 5iD2@ '77-93 B. Krooss Hlersey n 3.00 -1@ . "L 3 :5.00 4 80.0 -;'17 1 1 ! 10. 0 2 '225. G@05 45MO-87 Soectrum Devel Corp Hersey Lrfixt Lot BA :b@ I I 1 20.() b5.M 85. 30 1 1. Ca I . K) 124 2 NL 225.0261 177-6% Cedar Point Devel Hig@, FcInt Rd Lot 4 '124 1 1 1 2,10.0 75.00 !Gl . 00 3 !2.00 12 2 225.0292 457-204-87 C. & L. Drenkhahn 96 high St I 1 1 200.0 50.00 65.00 3 !.0j 12.00 12 1 YL 225.01117 177-412 Symes Assoc Olt lm@qt St 1 1 1 140.0 33.53 4S.Blu 12-4 2 225.0135 177-413 Symmes Assoc off High St 2 I.:iD6 I 1 1 140.0 33.00 45.00 3 SO.00 12-4 2 225.C,30 177-284 V. Crisp x i gn St Lot 3 11,3 1 1 1 1100.0 68.00 84.00 3 A.Co !4 2 hign St 225.al% 177-518 B. Wilkins I I 1 209.0 65.00 90.00 45.00 2 2 r- 12.00 12 2 225.@266 07-0 icn Crisp aSons Hi gr, St /10 i I 1 220. 0 60.60 ?0.00 3 225. G1 71 40t)-534 M. Assoc hign St I I 1 190.0 30.00 42.00 3 1.50 6.00 34 2 225.0249 177-655 Cedar ?Dint Devel K, gh St Lot 3 r,!25 I 1 1 2210.0 65. m M.00 3 10.0a @t 2 225.0!11 177-374 Kil wy Realty Trust High St 16 .:/27 1 1 1 100.0 12.00 28.00 3 10.00 12 2 2215 @042 177-23S Swale Corp nign St 120. .../19 1 1 1 160.0 35.00 47.00 3 10.00 1 1 M.024b 208-2448 R. Dow high St 25 1 1 1 265.0 7B. M B3.00 1 1.00 15. M @.M 5 4 225.G331 177-M5 V. Crisp High.St -o/02 1 1 1 180.0 S8.00 84.00 3 20.00 4 2 225.0,12 177-375 Kilmory Realty Trust high St 15 2 @' J27 1 1, 1 120.0 12.00 26.00 3 6.00 12 2 225.0265 177-666 Yer.n Crisp & Sons high St ;,."I'D .1 1 1 260.0 62. m ang 3 25.00 2 2 225. U35 177-915 Corver Stone School High St -ght 2 1 .1 1 175.0 10.00 21.00 3 60.00 2 225.0182 177-5U IL, Vilkins High 5t 1 1 1 200.0 55.00 70.00 3 7.00 34 2 225. ON5 177-SM @ih St Lot 1 .1 1 1 2M. 0 65.00 B4.00 3 6.00 S 225.0205 177-570 Highland Tidewter Rd 9 .1 1 1 140.0 20.00 31.00 3 25.60 3 2 225.0082 177-164 Rsc-on'. 29 Hologren Acres 120. 1 1 140.0 30.00 42.00 3 8.00 2-4 1 I * !D9118 1 1 160.0 38.00 3 , lo'en Acm 15. m 23 M,GlMt 177-416 3@ Stamm - 225.0045 ,177-1@7 He" M. Cost hologren Am lU0. 1, 1 360.0 1.00 42.00 3 .4.00 2-4 AIM I 1@il 225. M97; 177-298 R. Scamm floleven Acrq@ 1 260.0 35.00 3 8.00 2 M mat as 40 3. M 1-4 1 . 7-179 h. Cong molwen Am J4108 I I 3M.0 Woo 47m 3 225.006,7 77-.@l PV"i b 'j 6A Holwen Acres" 7.00 1-* 1 120. 1;: 11/13 1 1 1 12J.0 25.00 45.00 3 2 225.0079 177-122 1 J B111 Hologren Acres 120. .::1/13 1 1 1 80.0 30.G0 L2.00 3 50.00 2 1 3 Mrs % Hologren kres. 140. 11211V I I J[D.0 3@00 51.00 3 115.=k 177-14S @.00 12& 225.00e 177-19t @rtl Hol*ven, A a., -e*s - - 1220. 1;04j0t I 1 1 320.0 19.00 42.00 3 1.50 1-4 .177-U M. @"l 1 140.0 20.00 47.00 3 `30.00 3 3 a, 225. OD26 - I aldrs Hologm Acres 225.0086 177-152 h 3 Bldrs holwm Acres 60.0 10.00 3 50.00 1 225.0187 Hologren Fare id Ir 177-524 B-I" -9/08 1 1 1 260.0 38.00 46.00 3 60.00 1 2 225.0167 177-466 D. Lawlor Hologren Rd 28 /-b/16 I 1 1 200.0 35.00 45.00 3 6.00 2-1 2 225. M 177424 Develco of Strathaa Hizes Ct Lot 12 1 1 140.0 MDO 63. M 15.00 2 14 M.C304 177-763 Lamprey Bldrs Hums Ct Lot 10 7 1 1 140.0 20.00 47.60 3 20.00 2 Om 160 FARCL--;. ELE J 1 -6, , , i@,L 225.0296 1236- Lamprey 81irs H@mes Ct Lot7 8@ I 1 1 145.0 D. b: 4 @3 3 I.CG 7.00 9.00 14 2 225.0312 177- Ldmprey Bidrs nures Ct Lot 11 1 1 1 1 U0.0 25. CIO 42. 03 3 i0O.GO 14 2 225.0337 177-910 M J alks "es Ct Lot 13 li:;Iia I I 1 250.0 45.00 62.CO 3 12. 00 24 2 125.0299 177-776 S, Kansedu Humes Ct Lot1 /08 17 1 140.0 15.00 46.CO 3 15.013 2 2 225,0311 172- M. Eichler Hum Ct Lot5 /:5/13 1 1 100.0 19.00 42.00 3 15.00 A 2 /17/26 T, j W 225.027 177-879 M & J Bldrs H@aes Ct Lot 14 U 4.0.0 ,12.00 27.00 3 100.00 110 31 m7 1 200.0 .12.00 30.00 3 65.00 177-942 P. Structures Jewett Hill Portsmouth Ave 225.0351 R Orchard Homes Kirriemuir Condos "k 225.0031 177-W 60'.... ;"1 1.40.0 V3.00 23.00 3 30.00 2 lu/lfjl@ a 30.00 17?-814 Develco of Stratham Long Hill Lot is 600.0 120.00 146.00 3 .."I , i- 225-0317 i0o,". 225.0348 177-%0 G. h J. Sterritt Long Hill Rd Lot 17 .'12/20 Ai .',1 0,' 125.00 147.00 3 10.00 2 225.0314 177-817 Wil4n Cp Inc oft Lovell Rd '4/19 ':7 1 140.0; 26.00 45.00 3 60 00 . 2 t 225.0315 177-816 Macmillin Co Inc off Lovell Rd Loo,,@, 15.00 44..O.Q 3 2 Ir 00 225.0302 Iii-783 Aberdean Realty Trust Lovell Rd 200.0,, 12.00 42.00 3 6 2 CM:M(6)=Wders W, , - 32.00 42.00 3 26. 00 f! 2 2 225.020 177-619 R. Scamon Lovell Rd .1,4/02 1, 1 '1 .0 15 '1.00 225.0284 177-741 Glen Gary Inc Lovell Rd 10/26 1 . 1. 260.0 .00 3 CA f .2 Ilarker' .3' /38/12 24 2. 225,0121 367-61 Lovell Rd 74 60.00 101.00 3 0.33 ECkJ iff i i@R 01Q, 177-782 Aberdeen Realty Trust Ii.06 . 1 . . 2 Lovell Rd /31/12 1 @17@ 1 -1 012.00 39. DO 3 12 225,0333 177-924 F. 5ilva 2 Mark Ave /39130 175.0 20.00 40.00 3 16.00 2 Meadow's Condo 120 k.O 30.00 63.00 3 10.00 2 2 225.DQ69 177-162 Develco Inc 225, 0065 177-144 Develoo Inc Meadow's Condo 120. '/1 F@ 1@ I 1 220.0 30.00 50.00 3 20.00 24 2 225.0067 177-180 Develco Inc Meadow's Condo 120.Q /09 1 1 180.0 42.00 50.00 3 15.00 2 1 225,0068 177-181 Develco Inc Nadow's Condo 120.0 ;"/09- 1 1 160.0 42.60 5O.OD 3 2O.D0 2 1 225,006- 177-222 Develco Inc Meadow's Conoo 120.0 1.-15/31 1@@ 1 1 260.0 40.00 64.00 30.00 2 2 225, rD66 177-143 Develco Inc madow's Condo 120.0 ": 2jIO 'I. *I 2CO.0 30.00 50. W 3 4 3 225.0070 177-141 Develco Inc mtalcw' 5 C @ndo 120.6 :@)107 1`@ 1 1 160.0 40.00 63.00 3 2 3 225.OB2 177-887 E. Gtilien Cak Ln Lot 32 :@31/04 1 1 1 240.0 30.00 42.00 3 8.bo 1 2 225,0342 177-a82 M h J BlJrs Oakridje i: Lot5 z/01 I I 1 200.0 30.00 42.00 3 10.00 12 2 00 225,0@@l 177-US Lal,prey aldrs Oakrid@e Sd Lot4 1 1 1 180.0 25.00 42.00 3 15.00 11 2 225.03"t 177-912 M 5 1 811's Orchard Or Lot7 V12 I 1O.Lj 2-4 1 1 275.0 60.00 80.00 3 125.C3-18 177-87a M@ Nrxt Cr@@.ar@ L,411 Park Lot6 1 1 50.00 70. N I S,(m 2 2 24-5.0-7 177-9@3 @ow,jn H,-:nzs jrc@ar@ pl, Lot 12 i@ !,05 1 1 1 180,0 55.00 7O.Cu 3 3O.GO 4 2 225.001.4 177-k Emanuel C@ !no 60.0 7- 1 1 1 320.0 12.00 21.00 3 3.00 4 2 2,5@0028 177-73 F. EmarLe, Patr; *ols Ro 60.0 1 1 1 400.0 3.00 21.00 3 3.00 3 2 @)5.j531 177-923 R. 1';en Lot5 1 1 1 275,0 3100 44. 'a 3 5. GG 1 2 1 0. X 225.ail? 457-86-2 5. Grenier 46 Foc W-@od D. J9 1 1 200.0 56."- 3 1.00 30.00 2-4-^@ 2 YL 1113 1 ' 1 4-12 2 225.0'@5 177-609 F. Aent@c. 102 -ortsxoL@@ Ave 1 220.0 20.00 40.@O 3 6@GO @57-130-87 - suil@---, e 39 "18 1 1 1 250.0 21100 4 i. `,] 3 1.00 15.00 123 2 YL 225. Ll @'j 177-S39 Eizinue, Ent 102 1 1 1 380.0 15,GO 25,C@ 1 5.CQ 3 2 -.3.0 7 1 1 450.01 30. CC, 1 '2. C, 3 1.00 10.50 4 2 !8.@c 21,. 88 225,3.1,4 pcrt P,- Ave 96 1 1 11 12o.r 16. 3 ca. 5C 4 -j 2 ...... I lo- 2. @,O 3 3, Ac,oos A,@ s6 1 1 ! 4CO. G 4 2 2 4,c I I 3,zo. a 2.CO .3 1O.LO 2 F L i nAv, I 280.Ci 5 4. 03 1 2 i r 86, 2 9 @ GI; :3. -..3 S 1 2 iL 1?7-52 . 3 2 J. L,'! A,t 861 1 1 3CO.0 15,00 ',L). @0 3 7.00 r'. Ito.0 35. 01@ CJ 3 0. 5 10. --3 ',,1. 03 4 2 2 1, 2 $7, '2 1 ^210 50.00 63-1110 3 0.50 2 5. D1 !2. 00 2 2 0,561 .-,). :,, o.,33 3 2 86, 1 1 ii5,L _,a 4 2 J ail 0. 00 1@0 01 3 2 r 389. @G.00 @A i12 -1 2 2 4' 'J 841 1 1 :,@jl, C;i Ro, 1,:3 W, j C. .7d 3 2@5 -,11 1 8@,,rs Roian, Firm 084/ 1 1 1.1 SOI. 00 3 8. lu 2.4 2 J;" 81:t,,, CA$I',G Y,.1 YK, ITO SWi. LIV76;R, J,* 2 177-813 Limpret 51d! f @;ra@ I.; Lot @2 i 14 r'. 0 85. 00 103 00 75.00 125.00,13 17 7 -117 W, Bin Rull@fis Farm 11, 8Af 1 1 2COAV X. DO 15.00 E@ 177- S 0 84: 2 10 JL 5 Lf) Q. R, 1v 0 84, 1 15. @O 0 4 RC 1 n 23 & B.s 1 OC, fj 3. 50 25. UJ 1`4 2 1,25 b,4, bie,y Ro. 01 BB 1 1 @Jj i@ GLI i@o I??- 1.SS S1,;e,r "rkat @tt 1@1! t5.0 85, 1 1 i @, (1. 0 B. @,o 2 u C ,25. 01)42 177-611 H. Laboite Fte K; 1 501'.0 36.00 4b 00 3 1.00 !-4 2 2'15.[@k 1?@-550 r.1'1V.C,4ZK Stf'JCI,@, eS 10i 96 1 1 1 4 i S. 11 1 S. C) C 0 2". 00 4 2 12, 1U 77-A9 5ha@'., ig;vrarket Ft, ,M '86,' 8 4 1 1 2,3C. C 3.00 21.00 3 50. 00 2 225, 0,' t, 7 7 -t, 1.0 Labxte Rtt iz, 31. 3@ @C. GO i-4 2 2 0 2 Cn: OBt 6' ) zf @5 0 4i l7i-IL2 @tratrz A;way Rte 1@1 80.0 95.:,- 1, 1 1 2G3. 0 W N.M 2C.O. 0 3. 00 2@. (5. 00 0 2 I J@ 1-17- Iq Sr'.36, s Spei ma-, E, R@t 1 4 1 1 221. @G: 2 77-33 Fi@ar@s Pl,@ F:-@ 80.0 44i 5 4 1 400. D 3. CJ 21 @0 5. N 1:6 225 0 1.0a 4 2 YL 22, i6 2f' 0 @tl 9 1'- 00 2 2 ',3'7 A. Cc*.e 1 i :6E. 0 X. 5..", ; Z., 1-4 2 22' .0i,9 367-13 Yankee koo nrKet Rte I'"'t 4 1 1 360.0 18.00 41 . 301 3 6.33 1.00 2 2 225.0275 457-125-87 S. Bceys R@,ssell Cr Lot 4 !,:7 1 1 1 150.0 55. 03 8i. GO 3 1.00 40. 00 12 1 IL 225.0216 457-86-171 J. Mrptv Ru@sel; Dr 2 :1/13 1 1 1 225.0 70.00 81.00 3 1.00 25.00 30.00 124 2 225.Qlk? (57-86-IU B@wtr@, Wt R@@ssell Dr 1 1 1 250.0 50.00 67,00 3 1, 00 10.00 20.00 2-3 2 YL '25. 0349 177-955 8. Robertson R@,ssell Rd 1 1 140.0 50.00 63.1,0 3 30.00 1 2 225.0162 177-457 R. Scarx Sancy Foint Rd !-,3 1 1 1 403.0 12.00 20A 3 2 1.50 1 125-03% 177-M R. McFay-land Sdidy Point Rd 120.0 iJ7 I I 1 180.0 5.00 21.00 3 3 1 225.0298 177-775 Qual i t y douts Sandy Point Rd Lot 5 -i:8 I 1 1 400.0 5.00 209.00 3 2.50 3 2 225-0055 172-218 Swale Carp Sandy Point Rd 120.0 S128 I I 1 120.0 9.00 21.00 3 25.00 2 2 22S.0225 177-617 Ouality Hues Sandy Point Rd :.*,!0,. 1 1 1 200.0 4.00 20.00 3 6.00 6 2 C,1:08(6)=fill 225.00% 177-349 Swale torp cnr Sandy Pt 6 Depot Rd @V29 1 1 1 500.0 15.00 3 1.25 2 2 225.0213 177-571 N. Beairsto Cfr Sandy Pt & Depot Rd 1 1 1 100.0 30. M SIM MW 2 225.G271 177-699 Security Homes Inc Scammon Farts Rte 101 -;/10 50.00 1-4 2 I 1 1 340.0 44.00 U.00 3 225.C270 177-700 Security Hows Inc Scamn Farts Rte 101 1 1 1 445.0 U. 00 69.00 3 20.00 1-4 2 225.0138 177-408 ?am Structures Smith Farm, Rd 1 1 1 220.0 11.00 26.00 3 7.00 4 2 225.0139 177-407 Pe@@ WUiu*res Smith F&,m Rd :):124 1 1 1 140.0 11.00 27.00 3 20.00 4 2 225.0194 -177-537 American Land Squamscott Rd M.M $2. M 5M L 2 225.0193 i77-5m Americin Land SQJUSCott Rd 2 '103 1 1 1 SM. o 40.00 54.00 3 30.00 4 2 1225.0160 177-480 Pipers Idg Gen Partnership Strathm Cir I Rte 108 .-,7/08 1 1 1 460.0 11.00 25.00 3 6.00 1 2 .'225.0277 3-794 P.A.ChxM Strathas He*s Rd Lot9 1 323.0 20.00 52.DD 3 1.00 50.00 4 2 0 Lot 55 457-12 -8@ R. @trathw Heigh@s Rd 1 1 1 400.0 185.60 215.00 3 1.00 12.00 5 1 YL 225.0133 i*43j D. fjYjr Strathas he4ts Rd -2,5120 1 1 1 160.0 S9.00 60. W 3 2.50 2-4 2 vs. M 457-247-87 C. t I 1 1 275.0 45.Q0 60.00 3 1.00 3.00 124 5 rethaa Hqts Rd I YL 21 '39/05 225-019C .177-521 0 &AW 15 - - h , 140.0 30.00 40.00 3 10.00' 4 Re U111thal "s 2ii.QiiC D?-k7 Strethaa Wo(@@ 2W :is/04 I' 'I "I 1 360.0 50.00 100.00 3 30.00 4 Reed to I 1 100.0 5.00 21.00 3 20.00 1 MAU %-1177-15 $trathat Woods 04/11 3 IE 1 .1 6M.0 55.00 IM100 3 20.0.0 0230 @77-635 StratW*Ity'7rust-;- Sweester Farv 225.0212 243-28 aAridw.ws Bldirs Sweetland Way ;36/09 1 1 1 205.0 .45.00 60.00 3 2.00 30.00 8.00 1 2 225.0208 243-2j.'.. Wridgi dous-Bldirs '@-Sweetland Way /01/24 1 1 230.0 78.00 90.00 3 2.00 30.00 6.00 14 2 0.0' 50.00 64.00 3 2.00 2.00 30.00 It YL. G8 29 .,1 1 225. M 243-22 "'Sweetland Uiy &iV 2S5.0 65.00 82.00 3 2.00 35.00 10-M It I . 5, . . . 225.02101 2 Sweetland Way 0 04 doe "i@ eldrs, 2 6 i06/D5 I 225.0211 243-27 Sur@ridge Wg,4j.AI&s:. Sweetland W4y I, 1 230. o 37.00 50.00 3 2.00 I0.D0 8.00 14 2 243-23 @-,6uririw sw"tlar@ way 2 2 225.0207 /11127 1 1 1 255.0 58.00 72.00 3 2.00 3.00 15.00 14 225.02D9 243-25 &rkridge HWs 81&s Sweetland Way 4 1 1 1 155.0 14.00 50.00 3 2.00 24.00 5.00 14 1 Yl. 225.0122 367-70 P. Gralzme Tall Pine Dr 4 1 1 1 120.0 30.00 48.00 3 0.17 8.00 1-2 2 KSM91 CL6- IQ40 Royt Corit Tall Fine Rd 1 142.0 27.00 40.00 3 0, q 20,00 12 2 22, lall p4nes Or U, @jwb-, l I I I -zzI 'D. &0 @2. Ez: 3 30.00 2 2 !O.W 10.00 1 2 h. Prett @z; :,)n 0 31, 5' 05 2 lot / 13 1 1 i N U F ie 405/ls :1150 16 G. L!" 0. fjo U. 00 1 j 'iI 1)@- Jul 4uW lot /I @ I i i !4: J, 3 S. 1 cd t 1 1 /06/11 1 i 1 8,1 00 GL; r;O 3 2 211". 0.17L. "t- E@, i lu x@ t@-t i @c- '101/14 1 ; , [email protected] 20.03 ' 16 50 5:.. 00 1 Yi 22s - 0." t @8 $6dlt I i4t.ater R@, 10 *5112 1 1 -, @?I@ 6.W 17 0) @-A 12'. C 1 bt 746:1 P T; @;,@at e r 5,: 9 10f/16 I I i :10: D 9.00 1@. W 3 "1:1 2 2 12S Po@ 177-5E8 A. pelci@@ T: o. ater Rc 2 1 1 14- @O 11.00 21. N 3 CIO 4 2 Sa, 'etL ":'P '[email protected] 6 1 10. 'U 20. C.' 60 2 '25. C@- R .G--. :-,,1 -@--er mc 1 0 'is. :2 217 @Cl't ?5 7. L1@ I 2 Lot 3 .,o. 0 , 0. 06 @,!. b(: Lie 14 @/04/ 1 21 35 Dt ve I co 15.@D "u-.00 3 23 4 2 401 0@ 0 1 @ @,j 3 N) 4 2 @2t 5@' G. Boura@@6 1.1) 3@i 41@611 30 2 50-4$ k. Clear 0, i 1 2 i OG 3 G. 1@ i.l. all 2 2 225.0038 604-94 R. Eldon inior, K.-T, /09/26 1 1 1 15C., 0 21.EO 3 3.00 3 172-3118 N. ejuntioer - @Z'nut Ave 1 200. 0 13.00 21.03 3 10.00 12 2 ;-25.0268 177-702 $wale Corp Walter,way Lot 4 1 1 1 100.0 30.00 42.GG 3 20.00 2 2 225.024a 177-7G3 Swale Corp Walter ay Lot 2 1 1 1 120.0 30.00 46.00 3 15.00 2 2 225.0269 177-761 Swale Corp Walter 6ay Lot 3 ?j69/14 1, i 1 340.0 30.00 42,00 3 30.00 2 2 225.0276 406-9,15 J. LaRosa Weagewaod Or 7108121 1 1 1 102.0 18.00 46.00 3 1.00 10. OZ, 1 2 225.G307 177-805 Spectrum Homes Wedgtwood or Lot 3 "10/23 1 1 1 120.0 20.00 42.00 3 60.00' 4 2 225.0273 457-129-67 M. Bird Wedgewood or Lot 108118 1 1 1 300.0 24.00 43.00 3 1.00 8.00 is I YL C:> 225.0260 177-693 Do Cook Wedgewood Rd Lot 4 1 1 1 100.0 14.00 21.00 3 60.00 i 2 ur) 225.0158 177-478 Montrose Im Wiggins Farm A7/09 1 1 1 lbo.0 8.00 20.00 3 27.G0 6 2 0:05(4)tvetlands 160.0 8.00 2-3.00 3 22.50 6 225.0159 177-479 Montrose Inc Wiggins Farm Rd 49?409 1 1 1 2 (M:OB(614wetlands 225.0136 177-434 E. Scaman Willow Brwk Ave ;104104 1 1 1 100.0 20.CO 45.00 3 15.00 4 2 225.0240 177-399 R. Scammon Willowbrook Ave 1 1 140.0 &GO 21.00 3 6, Oj 2 225' W52 177-938 Aterdeen Realty Trust off Willowbrook Rd Lot 2$@ 1@0121 1 1 1 0 20.00 4 2 225.0.1,53 177-939 ti 180 !5 40 0 3 30.00 4 Aberdeen Realty Trust off Willowbrook Rd Lo 4 1 1 1 160.0 0.00 0.0 2 225.M 1)7-964 Aberdeen Realty Trust Willowbrook Rd Lot 1 103 1 1 ! 200.0 10.00 21.00 3 8.00 4 2 225-0151 657-96-85 W. O'Loughlin Winding Brook 1 1 1 475.0 28.DO 41.00 3 L.00 5.00 1 2 YL MOISO [email protected] Delta Const Co Winding Brook 8 1 1 1 250.0 30.00 41.00 3 1.00 10.00 1-4 2 YL 225.00% 177-187 Winding Brook Corp Winding Brook or 225.0057 177-131 Swale to, Winding Brook Or 33.0 1 1 1 340.0 65.00 75.00 3 50.00 4 2 4, 1 1 10.0 15.00 21.00 3 5. W I I 225.0066-07130' Swale Corp Winding &look L, 41-.C @4 8.00 2 4 2 225.0058 177-186t 41nding Br@ Corp Winding Brook or 30.0 Ezr 66 1 1 1 UO.O;-" 65.00 75.00 3 50.00 .0297 177-770 @@J' R Winding Orc* R4 1! 01 1 1 1 200. 0 12.00. 21.00 3 6.00 4 2 o' .OKS 177-753' ----"17 Wirnitut RILT M I I I I&D.0 25.DO 41.00 3 2 50. DD 12 24'0278@ 1236- UjVrey Bldrs off Winnicut Rd"l 17 Z9 I I 1 225.0 40.00 53.00 3 1.00 4.00 7.00 34 2 0279 1236 'Laig@,y Bldrs off Winnicut Ri", 28 1 1 1 165.0 30.00 0.00 3 1.00 5.00 9.00 4 177-849 @l: -.j' klrflelo Realty Trust t@ Wirulicut 31 1 1 1 100.0 18.00 42.00 3 50.00 2 QinRicwt 2i@ NU 17i-W 4merican Land Rd 145.0 N.Do 55. M 3 30.00 12 2 z ii, 026 177-01 -'@Ajerican Land Winnicut Rd 32U 62.00. 84.00 3 20.00 4 2 112 1 1 1 '@77-807 Wir@i@Af Rd 7'4@ ry 3 :-.A I ao.f' 15.,Oo 6.00 16 2 ZA .0141l 177-405 Orchw-d P4ws Winnicutt Rd 23 1 1 1 360.0 14.00 26.00 3 30. GO 4 2 225.0131 177-439 M. D. F. Bldrs Winnicutt Rd iv "I, 1 140.0, lt.w tom I @O. DO, 2 2 225.OibY-11*-@9i M fi'y Bidrs- Winnicutt Rd /23 1 1 1 100.0 16.00 28.00 3 12.00 2 2 225.0132 177-438 M. D. F. Oldrs Winnicutt Rd f 017 1 1 1 140.0 1-2. DO 25.00 3 15.00 2 2 ?9 -40& 225.0140 177 Orchard Holmes Winnicutt Rd 1 1 360.0 14.00 26.00 60.00 4 2 225.0197' Bradgate Properties 1 1 122-`3 K.W @2. W I I.M 5o. W 2 YL 6RBI WE T- 225.010 457-36-& Delta Triangle Const Co 07/09 1 1 @01.0 :3. 31). C3 3 I.Cc 5.CO 2 YL 225.0183 172-56,. K. Chase 1 Sa. 0 8.00 2,). CO 3 25.00 2 225.02% 143-34 Northwood Designs -/04/14 0 18.110 ROO 3 1.00 10.00 2 41 @'j Ln WQ Appendix 1, page 8 USER'S GUID E FOR WELL COMPLETION REPORT DATA SUMMARIES (rev. 1/24/89) Attribute Explanation Data Type, Codes Data Entry Item Number on and Definitions conventions Well Completion Report WELL well driller's number Text 15 [driller's license no.)-[sequence no.) VRB Water Resources board Text I (3-digit numeric town code)-14-digit sequence no.) I.D. number town code must include leading zeros OPTI Optional number for (Reserved) cross referencing ELEV Elevation Real Number it feet above sea level LAT Latitude Integer 6 digit number for degrees, minutes and seconds with leading zeros included LONG Longitude Integer 6 digit number for degrees, minutes and seconds with leading zeros included NAME Well Owner, etc. Text 26 first initial and last name for individuals; complete name for contractors or companies (consult "dictionary" for accepted abbreviations) ROAD Address of well location Text 26 street name or reference point (consult "dictionary" for accepted abbreviations) TOWN Town in which well is located Text 22 complete came of town of abbreviations allowed) MAP map page number as recorded on Text 10 varies according to the coding system in use by the town's tax map a particular town; prefix BLK- indicates block number PARCEL Parcel identifier as recorded Text 12 varies according to the coding system it use by the town's tax map a particular town DCOMP Date well was completed Date 6-digit no. for year/month/day with leading zeros included USE Proposed use of well Text 1 October 1-domestic 2=small community water supply 3-municipal 4-commercial 5=industrial 6-agricultural 1-institutional 8-test/explaration 9=abandoned RSN Reason for constructing Text 1 well 0-other i-new 2-replace existing 3-deepen existing 4=provide additional supply 5-monitoring, (water level measurement or water quality sampling) 6-stratigraphic observation only TYPE Type of well Text I 0=other I-drilled in bedrock 2=drilled in gravel 3=dug 4-auger bole (any uncased bole) 5-driven point 6-undifferentiated TOTD Total depth of well Real number in feet below land I surface datum BDKD Depth to bedrock Real number in feet below land CASING Total length of casing surface datum installed in well Real number in feet 9 52 Appendix I, page 9 Attribute Explanation Data Type, Codes Data Entry Item Number on and Definitions Conventions Well completion YTM Yield test method Text I keport 11 I-bailed 2-pumped 3=compressed air YTD Yield test duration Real number in hours 11 Discharge Real number it gallons per minute 11 3 Static water level Real number O-overflowiag it feet below land surface datum 12 DUS Date static water level 1-at ground level) was measured Date 6-digit no. for year/month/day 12 with leading zeros included Water quality information Text 1 13 Y-"Yes" Laboratory analysis performed Null value (-O-)no" or not reported O Type of overburden material Text 16 25 O-exposed bedrock 1:sand 2:travel 3-till 4-clay 5-mixed 6-other Codes are entered layer by layer in the seuence reported in the WELL LOG; successive layers are sel>arated by a hyphen (for example, 12-4 indicates a sand and gravel layer overlying a clay layer; mixed is used if 2 through 4 are recorded on the same line; if "6" is used, an explanation is included as a comment under the attribute NOTE) Pump information (Reserved) C Subjective assessment Text I of quality of reported I-good information 2-fair 3-poor NOTE Special not 3 Text 31 yield log SN-screen information GP-gravel pack DD-drawdown measurements CII-comments -CM:" is used to explain any attribute coded as "other" fie., cx:USr(O)=fire protection) THE FOLLOVI ADDITIONKL ENTIONS APPLY AS NOTED: 1) no periods are permitted to tollow abbreviations within text fields, except in the case of WAKE where a period is reuired after the first initial 2) any attribute coded as "other" must be explained by means of a comment under NOTE; however, the code for any attribute can be qualified using a comment expressed in the standard format Cr.:attriiDute(code)-explanation as illustrated above 3) the 2-character NOTE codes must always be given in the order listed above and separated by a single space whenever multiple codes are needed (ie. SN GP and not G? SN) Source: Water Resources Division, N.H. Department of Environmental Services. 53 APVFMIX 11, Page I DATE. JUNE, 1988 '"N; STRATHM PUBLIC WATER S)STINS INVEN"Y WATER SUPPLY ENGINE-MING BUREAU WATER SUPPLY & POiJUrICN CON11tOL DIV. UEPARRIENf OF ENVIROMENFAL SERVICES MAP F C* S'bWOL N* EPA SYSIEN NAHE LATIME/LaCITULE OWNER'S R41E CWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS TOWN TEILEPiDNE SERVICE AREA 201 C 2232010 CIEN GARRY CONDCKNIMS 0430250/0705219 wsmmto PROM RTY MANA(aMr 142 FOR'I'&Wfli AVE, BOX 232 STRATUM NH 30 ACRES 202 C 2232U20 llkMifLL OUNIX11INIMS 0425914/0705324 TtUmlu, CONDO ASSOCIATION 142 MCFSHOUlli AVENUE STRAllwl ul 17 ACRES 2U3 C 2232030 SUZ RIVER COMMINIMS 0430250/0705240 L.A. HANNA & SONS, INC. 313 PORTSAOUIll AVENUE STRATIIAK U1772-2175 20 ACRES 204 C 2232040 WINDING BROOK CONDCt4INILklS 0430129/0705560 BAY REGION ASSOCIATES 7 DIERY'S IANKI STRKIHM NI 40 ACRES 205 C 2232050 SaLURAM GREEN CON[Dav"IUAS 0430140/0705505 DEVEIL0 OF SMIAlHAM, INC. I SIMON'S LANE NER4ARWf N11 35 ACRES 206 C 2232060 BALHORAL OONDCt4lNIUlS 0425943/0705256 S)I@ES ASSOCIATES 3 SU44ES DRIVE LONDONDMY N1926-9266 12 ACRES 207 C 2232070 MONTROSE OMX141NLLMS 0430140/0705250 J & S REALTY, INC. 142 FORTSKOUflI AVENUE STTWniAM Ni 25 ACRES 208 C 2232080 IJLEASANr RUN OONDCMINILMS 0430212/0705220 BRADGATE ASSOCIATES, INC. 74 NCRIIU@ASTERN BLVD. RVSHLA N1882-1307 10 ACRES 209 C 2232090 SlRA`IlW4 WOODS 0430059/0705523 REM & SMAII, INC. 8 BurrFAFIL?tj) LANE SlmIlw4 U1778-1221 20 ACRES 2lu C 2232100 WAR TREE OUN"INILMS OUOOOOO/0000000 O(A4EN 101 HIGH Sfl*;Lr S'iMlli&l "1 20 ALXES 211 C 2232110 SQMMSCUrr RETIRaIENT OONDOS OOOOoOCl/ClOOOOOO i.I.S. 142 FORTSMU111 AVENUE SIRAII LA14 ml 55 ACRES 501 N 2235010 AGORN SCIL)OL 0430048/0705204 WINNICUrf R(Y-J) STRATILAM N17788285 I BL1)G. 502 N 2235020 STUATHAM MEMQUAL SCHOOL 0000000/0000000 BUl"R HILL ROAD smum U1772-5413 1 BLDG. 503 N 2235030 N.H. VOCATIONkLIFECH. COLLEGE 0430238/0705321 IUCMIOU'lli AVENUE STRATUM til I BLDG. 5A N 223V40 LAY CARE CENM OQCl0UOO/uOOOOOO I BLJ)G. 5US N 2235050 STRAXHAM ELEH-.NrARY SCHOOL 0430202/0705308 1 BLDG. 601 N 2236010 KINGS HIGMAY PLAZA 0425958/0705518 NATIONAL PROIlERfY ANALYSTS 1804 RITTENHOUSE SQUARE PHILADE-LPHIA PA I BLDG. 602 N 2236020 KARKET BASKEr 0425958/0705505 C/o F&P FOODS EAST SrREE'f TEWKSBURY MM51-7381 I BLDG. 60 * 2236030 WALTER CHENEY REAL ESTATE 0430038/0705445 77 ELM STREET NAtW0ET W659-2754 I BLDG. 604 N 2236040 BELL & FLYNN. INC. OOOOOOO/OCOOOOO JOHN FLYNN 7 BUNKER HILL AVENUE STRAIHAM N1778-8511 NA 605 N 2236050 MaIM PLAZA 0000000/0000 000 JEAN BEAUMEAU 37 PORTS@Wfll AVENUE STRAIIIAM N1772-8888 I BLDG. 607 N 2236070 SHAW'S supuotARKff 0425946/0705518 CEND@AL DIVISION OrFICE RAtTaiOU111 AVE., BOX 389 STRATHAM N1772-8886 I BLDG. 609 N 2236090 ROCKINCHAK Na4SPAPERS O0000OL)/OCOOOOO I BLDG. 610 N 2236100 PIPER LANDING 0000000/0000 000 SUSAN COMAY 142 FORIaiOUTH AVEINUE SMATI VM N1772-5877 I BLDG. .611 N 2236110 INDUSTRLAL PARK 0000000/0000000 SUSAN CMMY , I BLDG. 701 N 2237UIO STYMIM HaL PARK 0000000/0000000 TCWN (F SMIHM SIRAIUM NH 100 ACRES 8Ul N 2238010 11E Qlki" AT STRAIIWJ 0430128/0705503 1 Bu)G. 802 N 2238020 THE cuup 0430007/0705507 GEORGE ANDLUMN 95 ffla"&JOUTH AVENUE S'FRATHM NR778-7738 I BLDG. 803 * 2238030 SIRAIHM CIRCLE FLORIST 0430100/070-54.56 LOUIS TERRAVECHIA 100 PQU'S@Wnf AVENUE STIMHAM Nif I HLDG. 804 N 2238040 THE CARRIAGE STALL 04430122/0705446 BLAIR KIRTLAND 143 PCRT%lOUTIl AVENUE STRATHM NH77242138 I BLDG. 901 N 2239010 STRAIHM CftiMITY CHURCH 0000000/0000000 Sllwllm cc&mrry CHLRCH DWRY'S LANE STRATHAM N1772-3389 I BLDG. 902 N 2239020 PARkQM PARISH H"/CONG. QUUi 0430106/0705510 MULE 107 STRATIM NI I BLDG. 903 N 2239030 siwmiAm uwN HAIL 0430126/0705454 APIEWIX 11, Pa8e 2 WX F C* SIABOL N* EPA SYSM WIE LATIUME/LDNGMU aMMIS XVC OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS lw IMHUZ SERVICE AREA A C ABERDEEN WESr WELLWBROW ANEWE SrRKnm Ul 15 ACRES B N Ukkmrmy SCHOOL GUFFMD FAM ROAD SIRAII LAN ul I BLDG. C C Man Hlu CU41MINILMS WlNNICUf AVENLE SMAIUM Nil 85 ACRES u N LIBRARY & FIRE WINNICUr MENLE SfRAMIM Nit 2 BLLIGS. E N SaILMING SPECUL siiwnm I BU)G. F N TLWN SWRE SFRATHM NA G C WIMAES-IRM SUMILAM NA Ln H N MEADUWUU ROUIE 101 STRATUM I BIJ)G. Lr) N GIL IS JEU PELmor ROUIE 101 silmliAl't tit I BLDG. N - NL)rrCuuamdty C - Coumu-it ty Nh Not Approved APPENDIX III UPDATED BY RPC, JUNE 1990 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS INFORMATION FOR STRATHAM, Nil MAP G FACILITY LOCATION, NUMBER OF TANK TANK PRODUCT MATERIAL OF TANK CODE NAME AND ADDRESS TANKS AGE CAPACITY DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION STATUS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 C & E SERVICE STATION 4 21 8,000 GASOLINE STEEL ACTIVE 39 PORTSMOUTH AVE. 21 5,000 GASOLINE STEEL ACTIVE 16 4,000 GASOLINE STEEL ACTIVE 21 2,000 DIESEL STEEL ACTIVE 2 CHARTER FUEL STOP 3 11 10,000 GASOLINE STEEL ACTIVE PORTSMOUTH AVENUE 3 USA, INC. 1 9 1,000 USED OIL STEEL INACTIVE 12 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE 4 KING'S HIGHWAY PLAZA 1 1 3,000 FUEL OIL STEEL ACTIVE ROUTE 101 5 L.A. HANNA & SONS, INC. 2 11 6,000 DIESEL STEEL ACTIVE Ln 31.3 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE 2,000 GASOLINE STEEL ACTIVE 6 LIONEL LABONTE, SUNOCO 2 23 6,000 GASOLINE STEEL INACTIVE ROUTES 101 & 108 2 26 500 USED FUEL OIL STEEL INACTIVE 7 NH VOCATIONAL TECH. COL. 1 5 10,000 FUEL OIL STEEL ACTIVE 277 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE 8 STRATHAM MU40RIAL SCHOOL 1 3 10,000 #2 FUEL STEEL ACTIVE 10 BUNKER HILL AVENUE 9 SULLIVAN TIRE 1 2 500 USED OIL STEEL ACTIVE 54 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE 10 STRATHAM VILLAGE MARKET 2 8 4,000 GASOLINE STEEL* ACTIVE 157 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE 6,000 GASOLINE With fiberglass lining. Source: Groundwater Protection Bureau, Water Supply and Pollution Control Division, N.H. Dept. of Environmental Services INN m -M m 4w Ar 'k- FAIL POAC MA,ff OAO j,t 1$@" ct"'Ir STRAT"AN MA JEWETT HILL .08 101 TC bLRKEWS HIGH t5; -ILL TC,,,@ PRE@ Z or, FU4 4: ':.e 0r@ -Z.Oz r!'C, 7 N 117 M alacl@: CLr RO'D PL" LAftr 40 ORP lot bv. I RA.@ WA 08 S ft'L, LE TRAT.&M HEIG04TS ROLLINS "ILL ZONING DISTRICTS RA Reskkmtial iAwimri"l by MAH Manufactured housing 03833 1976 PRE projessional/Residenti8l ...... IND 1, 0.1 I_ Ih. Of TC Town Center by SACOHI" 701 09 9k- "0-9 Art .1 GCM General Comrmrcial > TOM TOOOPIESEN comp V"" ORP office/Research Park 1000 0 -000 2000 3000 WD Ind% I -SCALE: I "Ch 1000 feet AQUIFER AREAS ZONING AND R LOCATIONS Q AQUIFE 4t, 9 A sL OCT IR Clog LL C, 41Z "ILL 'r, 1c, bT el-r JEWETr L4 HILL C Ff.; A, r SA*RZRS "(4k STOEtT SQ, % $ n?i fh# z cxeow CUT RO 5-M ya O"T c', E ROLLINS HILL e -=+-'GW--DE-US4T-Y--RESIDEN-T-IA-L--- ED MEDIUM-DENSITY RES. E MANUFACTURED HOUSING RES. 3 KA p PROFESSIONAL' RESIDENTIAL ...... TOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL FV66,04 qfo.t 0.001-0`6 0 cod wtm. @0., pfa..,.q &..." ...4 pT*:#*m sotkarlmod bi 54014" 70% of lk. @.." ecl .1 OFFICE - RESEARCH 195 go eft.".d. THE T"ORESEN GROUP 1255 0 INDUSTRIAL 4000 0 )000 2000 3000 AGRICULTURAL SCALE: I inc), 1 00 feel jig AQUIFER AREAS > @AAO P CL FU'URE LAND USE AND AQUIFER LOCATIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I v I I I I - -- r- I 1011 - 3-6668 00001- 6214-- - I