Development of a basin management program for the lower Matanzas River - Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek Watersheds phase I

[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

DEVELOPMENT OF A BASIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

FOR THE LOWER MATANZAS RIVER -

MOULTRIE CREEK AND MOSES CREEK WATERSHEDS

PHASE I

DER CONTRACT NO. CM-2107

DRAFT REPORT - MARCH 1989

FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT VERE PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATION, OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT USING FUNDS MADE AVAILABLE
THROUGH THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERE ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED.

m m m m m m = m m m m m m m m m M'M!M)

6@B @qa .6@6 r-6 m-i

I ,

Property Of
NOAA Coasta-I Se&vices Center
I Library
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I

CHAPTER

ONE SCOPE OF SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

TWO EVALUATION OF COUNTY PLANS . . . . . . . . . . 6

THREE WATERSHED HYDROLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

FOUR LAND CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

FIVE PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 69

GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193

APPENDIX

A. CONTRACT NO. CM-207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200

B. DETAILED SOIL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . 218

C. DESCRIPTION OF GIS COVERAGES . . . . . . . . 240

D. LIST OF CONTACTED AGENCIES . . . . . . . . . 242

REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

FIGURE @* I': , " - PAGE
1. PROJECT AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2. TOPOGRAPHIC AERIALS INDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3. DRAINAGE BASINS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

4. FLOOD PLAINS AND FLOODWAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5. MAJOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6. SOIL MAP UNITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

7. SOILS LIMITED FOR SEPTIC TANKS . . . . . . . . . . . 30

8. SOILS SUBJECT TO PONDING DUE TO SEASONAL HIGH

WATER TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
9. POTENTIALLY ERODIBLE SOILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

10. PRELIMINARY WETLANDS MAP BASED ON SJRWMD HYDRIC

SOILS CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

11. EXISITING LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

12. EXISITING LAND USE WITHIN DRAINAGE BASINS . . . . . 46

13. RESIDENTIAL AREAS PRONE TO FLOODING BASED ON

FLOOD PLAIN LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

14. URBAN AREAS PRONE TO FLOODING BASED ON

FLOOD PLAIN LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

15. RESIDENTIAL AREAS PRONE TO FLOODING BASED ON

SOIL CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

16. URBAN AREAS PRONE TO FLOODING BASED ON

SOIL CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

17. RESIDENTIAL AREAS PRONE TO FLOODING BASED ON

SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS . . . . . . . . 53

18. URBAN AREAS PRONE TO FLOODING BASED ON
SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS . . . . . . . . 54

19. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES AND

AREAS WITHIN FLOOD PLAINS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

20. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES AND

FLOOD PRONE AREAS BASED ON . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

FIGURE PAGE
21. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES AND FLOOD PRONE
AREAS BASED.ON SOIL LIMITATINS FOR DWELLING UNITS . . . . . . 58

22. POTENTIALLY ERODIBLE SOILS AND THE AFFECTED
WATER COURSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
21* POINT AND NON-POINT POLLUTION SOURCES 61

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE

1. TOTAL AVERAGE YEARLY STREAMFLOWS
IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND . . . . . . . . . 70

2. PEAK DISCHARGES FOR MOULTRIE AND
MOSES CREEKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

3. MONTHLY STREAMFLOW DISCHARGE IN CUBIC
FEET PER SECOND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
4. MOULTRIE AND MOSES CREEKS FLOOD@AY DATA 73
5. DRAINAGE BASIN ACREAGES . . . . . . .. . . 76

6. DRAINAGE BASIN ACREAGES AS FOUND BY FEMA. 77

7. MONTHLY AND..ANNUAL RAINFALL DATA FOR
ST JOHNS COUNTY NEAR ST AUGUSTINE . . . . . 78

8. BASIN ACREAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

9. ACREAGE OF DRAINAGE BASINS . . . . . . . . 81

10. MOULTRIE CREEK AND MOSES CREEK
FLOODWAY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

11. MAJOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES . . . . . . . . 84

12. DETAILED SOIL MAP UNITS . . . . . . . . . 88

13. SOILS SERIES AND RELATED SOIL UNITS . . . . 91

14. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SEPTIC TANKS . . . . . 94

15. SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE . . . . . . . . 97

16. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR EMBANKMENTS . . . . . 100

17. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR AQUIFER-FED
EXCAVATED PONDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

18. FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR DRAINAGE. .106

19. FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR
IRRIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

TABLE PAGE

20. FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR
TERRACES AND DIVERSIONS . . . . . . . . . . 112

21. FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR
GRASSED WATERWAYS . . - . . . .1 . . . . . . 115

22. SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS . . . . . 118

23. SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SOIL
PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

24. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS 128

25. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS
WITHOUT BASEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

26. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS
WITH BASEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

27. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL
BUILDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

28. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR LOCAL ROADS
AND STREETS . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 140

29. SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING 143

30. RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES FOR SOILS AS A
SOURCE OF ROADFILL . . . . . . . . . . . . 146

31. PROBABILITY OF FINDING AGGREGATES SUITABLE
FOR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149

32. RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES FOR SOILS AS A
SOURCE OF TOPSOIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152

33. EROSION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS . . . . . 156

34. ANIMALS THAT MAY OCCUR IN ST JOHNS COUNTY
WHICH ARE LISTED BY THE USFWS OR FGFWFC . . 160

35. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN ST JOHNS COUNTY . 167

36. THOSE SOILS WHICH MAY SUPPORT THE
ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN ST JOHNS COUNTY. .168

37. THOSE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES WHICH MAY BE
FOUND IN THE SOIL UNITS OF ST JOHNS COUNTY 171

vii

TABLE PAGE

38. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY
USFWS OR FCFWFC AND OCCURRING IN
ST JOHNS COUNTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

39. SOILS CHARACTERISTIC OF FLOODING . . . . .. . 187

40. SOILS WITH FLOODING LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING
UNITS WITH AND WITHOUT BASEMENTS . . . . . . 188

41. SOILS WITH FLOODING LIMITATIONS FOR SMALL
COMMERCIAL SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189

42. DESCRIPTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS (STP). 190

43. AREAS WITH HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC TANKS . . . . 191

44. AREAS WITH SEWER SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . 192

vii

ABSTRACT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR PHASE I

The value of the established goals and objectives of the

development of a basin management program for the lower

Matanzas River - Moultrie Creek and Moces Creek Watersheds,

Phases I and 2, is enhanced by St. Johns County's ability to

apply them directly to daily county operations. The data

gathered during Phase I of the basin management program will

be used as a basis for processing residential and commercial

building permits. The basin management program will also

serve as a tool to be used by the county in evualating

applications for rezonings, Final Development Plans,

Subdivision Plats and Developments of Region a I Impact,

thereby enforcing the Easn Management Program objectives.

Phase I of the Basin Management Program has been

primarily a data collection and presentation effort. Data

related to hydrology, topography, drainage systems, soil

types, natural resource areas, and pollution sources has been

collected from a large volume of references, Most of the

collected information has been graphically presented in a

series of maps of uniform scale.

Presentation of data has been a strong concern during

Phase 1. St. Johns Count/ has taken full advantage of the

opportunity presented by the CI 207 grant to begin to build a

computerized geographic information ,stem ,GIS.) data base

for the study area. During the design of the data base

itself, the county held several meetings with potential users

of the information compiled for the study area. These

resulting descussins helped to identified several county

wide needs to be addressed by the data presentation systems

including:

manipulation for variety of uses.

consistency with other state and federal agencies with
respect to format, scale and presenttation.

logical data base construction within the GIS to ensure
the long term value CA of the information package to
the user.

complete data collection to meet the needs of all county
departments to be involved in the basin management
Program.

consistency of information with the Comprehensive Plan
findings, goals And presentation.

practical daily application of the data base for use
in clearance sheets preparation, building permit
issuance, preliminary wetands identification
(utilizing soil types, topography, aerial photography
and hydrologic information), St. Johns County Health
Department site analysis for the permitting of
wastewater treatment facilities St. Johns County
Planning and Zoning Department use in monitoring land
use, changes in density and open space requirements,
and St.John's County Engineering Department use in
determining right of way requirements for roads,
drainage, regional stormwater treatment facilities
and ordinance modifications.

Each of the different types of data has been input as a

separate map "layer" into the ARC/INFO system. The county is

able to manipulate the "layers" as necessary to relate a

variety of graphical information either separately or in

combination. The county has selected the property.

appraiser's map as the base map for the GIS for a number of

reasons.

The County operates primarily on a property ownership

parcel basis. When a plat is recorded, the plat map is sent

directly to the St. Johns County Property Appraiser's office,

and the offical county Property Appraiser's map is modified

to reflect the subdivision of land. By the same token, when

a building permit is issued, the permit is issued according

to property ownership and permit information is forwarded

back to the St. Johns County Property Appraiser's office to

assist him in the upgraded Assessment for that particular

parcel. Tax collection in turn is based upon property

ownership And appraised value. The St. Johns County

Emergency 911 address system is also based Upon the Property

Appraiser's map and ownership records. All of these factors

in combination make the selection of the Property Appraiser's

map as the base map straight forward.

The computerized GIS, as developed, is able to relate

site characteristics to the location of An individual parcel.

This site specific information will prove invaluable in sound

basin management and daily county operations. The value of

GIS manipulation of the data. base At a particular parcel

location can be observed manually by overlaying mylar prints

of the separate map information "layers" at a uniform scale.

The manual placement of map "layers" over the Property

Appraiser's (scale I" = 200'), enables the observer to mimic

x i

the computerized data base process.

Phase I has been primarily a data collection and

presentation effort. During Phase 2, this information will

serve as the basis for modifications to Paving and Drainage

Ordinance No. 86-4 and other county programs.

xii

BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION

The Florida Coastal Management Program has previously supported

(1979) investigations of shellfish growing areas in the Matanzas River,

toward the overall goal of protecting these resources from the effects

of anticipated population growth. These investigations identified

septic tanks and non-point source pollution (i.e. stormwater drainage)

as the major threats to the future health of the area's estuarine

waters. Subsequently, the St. Johns County Commission adopted a county

wide drainage ordinance and strengthened regulation of septic tanks.

Additionally, the state adopted more stringent water quality standards

for much of the area.

In spite of these regulatory actions, most of the shellfish growing

areas in St., Johns County recently have been closed to harvesting

and the remai ning "conditionally approved" areas are threatened. it

is now generally recognized that maintenance of the overall health

of estuarine resources in the area will require more comprehensive,

basin-wide management approaches as well as refinement of existing

project-by-project regulatory actions administered by St. Johns County,

Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) and the St. Johns River

Water Management District (SJRWMD), including special area management.

Major obstacles confronting basin-wide management in the area

include the size and complexity of drainage areas involved, a severe

lack of detailed information upon which to develop needed plans and

ordinances, as well as rapid population growth in critical watershed

areas.

PROJECT OBJECTIVES

This work is Phase I of a two to three year project which will

provide the basis for county wide improvements in stormwater

management, flood protection and protection of natural resources.

Phase 1 work will emphasize developing a sound data base on

characteristics /conditions of the study area. Information developed

will be in sufficient detail and in a form usable for day-to-day

regulatory and engineering work by the St. Johns County Engineer's

Office, as well as for developing comprehensive basin management

strategies in Phase 2 of the project.

Specific Phase 1 work objectives are as follows:

1. Develop a comprehensive inventory of areas wi thin the watersheds
that deserve special management con sideration. This inventory
will be used as a basis for the following:

a. Improving coordination and regulation consistency between
St. Johns County, the SJRWMD; the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, (COE) and DER:

b. Revising the County's comprehensive plan; and

C. Future resource investigations by state and local agencies.

2. Develop detailed information on topography, soils, flood prone
areas, land use and other conditions pertinent to achieving
stormwater management, flood prevention, and resource protection
objectives for the study area.

3. Develop refinements for special area protection under County
Ordinance 86-4 and apply these refinements within the study
area. This will include specific recommended actions such as
stormwater master plans, improved performance standards for
new development, provision of infrastructure to reduce
environmental impacts, and improved coordination between state,
regional, and local efforts to control non-point pollution.

4. Use products developed for special area management in the project
area as a prototype for improving flood protection and storrawater
controls in critical resource areas throughout the county.

PROJECT TASKS 3

Five major tasks were developed to achieve the project objectives

of Phase 1:

Task 1: Project refinement.

Task 2: Assess opportunities for refining existing plans, regulations
and management tools.

Task 3:, Establish an understanding of the hydrology of.the Moultrie
Creek and Moses Creek Watersheds.

Task 4: Inventory and assess land characteristics and land use with
in the watersheds.

Task 5: Analysis of information developed in Tasks 1 through 4.

PROJECT AREA

The priority area selected for this project is experiencing

increasing development pressures and poses critical flood prevention

and stormwater management problems as growth occurs. Relative

to other parts of the county, significant natural resources in

the area remain undisturbed.

Work during 1988 focused on the Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek

Watersheds4" In general, this includes the area east of the

Interstate 95 bounded on the north by State Road 312 and on the

South by State Road 206. State Road 207 forms the northwest boundary

(see FIGURE 1). Adjacent waters of the Matanzas River are also

included.

SR 16

C5 7
(2s

0 0

tJSTINE:

L
C:

ST I 1*-T E

MIL I. S SR 206

SCALE 1 63,360

MOULTRIE CREEK AND MOSES CREEK
ST JOHNS COUNtr WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT
e

BASEMAP LINE KEY
ct: PRIMARY/SECONDARY
PROJECT HIGHWAYS
AREA IMPROVED /UNiMPRO V I D
A LI) ROADS
LO ..
- WATER
X BOUNDARIES
M Produced by the St Johns County
(n Geographir inrormaLion System /V RAILROADS
Using PRIME 4RC/iNFO.
0)
00
FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT WERE PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATION, OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT USING FUNDS MADE AVAILABLE
C\j
CL THROUGH THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERE ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE FIGURE 1. PROJECT AREA
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED.

CHAPTER ONE

SCOPE OF SERVICES

TASK 1: PROJECT REFINEMENT

This task finalizes the plan of work and contract scope

of services required to achieve project objectives. The Master

Work Plan is listed in Appendix A.

CHAPTER TWO

EVALUATION OF COUNTY PLANS

TASK 2: ASSESS OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFINING EXISTING PLANS, REGULATIONS,
AND MANAGE14ENT TOOLS

This evaluation will be ongoing throughout the life of this project

and will focus on achieving specific, practical improvements. Initially,

emphasis will be placed on assessing the current St. Johns County Paving

and Drainage Ordinance and identifying needed improvements. The guidlines

and objectives of this study will be incorporated into other county plans

and programs in Phase 2 and beyond.

SUBTASK 2A: REFINEMENT OF THE EXISITING ST. JOHNS COUNTY DRAINAGE
ORDINANCE No. 86-4 TO PROVIDE CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL
MANAGEMENT AREA AND WATER QUALITY PROTECTION NEEDS INCLUDING:

1. ONSITE TREATMENT CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER.

2. IMPROVED DESIGN CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES GOVERNING
BOTH THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF STORNWATER DISCHARGE.

The St. Johns County Paving and Drainage Ordinance specifies minimum

design and construction standards for public and private roadways,

and drainage facilities for single family, multifamily, commerical,

institutional and industrial construction projects within the

unincorporated areas of St. Johns County.

Under the current ordinance, all subdivisions, multifamily,

commerical, industrial and institutional projects must provide for

retention of stormwater within the boundaries of the project. For

projects within areas designated for "Zero Discharge", storage shall

accomodate a 100 year, 24 hour storm event. For all other areas,

retention must accomodate the greater of (A) the first one half inch

of stormwater within the boundaries of the project area, or (B) the

first one inch of stormwater from all roofs, sidewalks, paved surfaces

and parking areas (at 100% run-off), whether paved or not. The project

must also provide detention for all stormwater flows.

Paving and Drainage Ordinance No. 86-4, adopted by the St. Johns

County Board of Commissioners on January 14, 1986, requires surface

retention and detention of stormwater run-off. However, provisions

for alternative means of water quality treatment and disposal have

not been allowed. Refinements to the Paving and Drainage Ordinance

are being considered in conjunction with Task 2, during Phase 2 of

this study. Potential refinements to the Paving and Drainage Ordinance

No. 86-4 include, but are not limited to the following:

Regional treatment facilities.

Alternative pavement methods, including turf block and porous
concrete, which may reduce direct offsite discharge, and
encourage onsite percolation.

Provisions for alternative stormwater treatment devices
including underdrains, exfiltration and other mechanisms.

Incentives to reduce pavement surfaces and promote innovative
site design.

Requirements for maintenance plans and routine maintenance
schedules prior to project construction authorization.

Monitoring for compliance with permits and maintenance schedules
after completion of construction.

There are four specific areas of concern that will be addressed

in Phase 2 of this project. They are:

1. Control of Pollutants

2. Stormwater Treatment Methods.

3. Stormwater Treatment Methods.

4. Water Quality Policies.

1. Control of Pollutants. Various pollutants are introducted into

stormwater as a result of the "first flush" of rainfall. This equates
to the first one inch of run-off which Iis responsbile for 90% of
the pollution load from a storm event.

These pollutants include various lawn and crop chemicals

(insecticides, herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, etc.) that

are swept along with soil sediment and animal wastes. Also, oil,

grease, and litter are washed off pavements into the stormwater

system.

Presently the control of pollutants is accomplished by the

treatment of the first one inch of run-off. This helps to minimize

the impact of pollutants on the quality of water.

2. Stormwater Treatment Facilities. Onsite, development, and

9
stormwater treatment facilities need to be considered.

Onsite treatment systems provide detention and/or retention

storage to control water quanity and water quality. The storage

of this stormwater provides limited water quality treatment depending

on storage duration, waterflow, and filtratin materials.

A development treatment facility is designed to accomodate

the increased stormwater demands produced by a change in land use.

This type of facility provides a series of onsite storage basins

that control the flow of the stormwater through a cascading stage

of basins and reduce the resultant impact on water quality.

A regional treatment facility serves a larger area and may

include many dvelopments and communities. This type of system is

costly in terms of set up costs and overall maintenance. However,

it may prove to be economical in the long run if planned and designed

effectively and effic"iently.

3. Treatment Methods. There are many methods available that can

be considered for the treatment of stormwater. These include swales,

retention ponds, dry/wet detention ponds, natural lakes, natural

filtration, underground exfiltration systems, vegetation, forestation,

and the use of semi-pervious pavement materials.

4. Water Quality Policies. At the present time, there are few

policies regarding stormwater quality. Stormwater by its very nature

is expected to be polluted. However, water discharged from the

stormwater system is carefully regulated.

SUBTASK 2B: IDENTIFYING MECHANISMS WHEREBY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
CAN BE INCORPORATED IN OTHER COUNTY PLANS AND PROGRAMS,
INCLUDING:

1. ROAD CONSTRUCTION DENSITY AND ZONING CONTROLS,
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ETC.

2. IDENTIFICATION OF STORMWATER- RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE
NEEDS, INCLUDING LAND ACQUISITION, FLOW EASEMENTS,
ENGINEERING DESIGN, ETC. AS WELL AS FUNDING
MECHANISMS FOR MEETING THESE NEEDS.

The guidelines and objectives of the Basin Management Program.

will be incorporatedt.@ within other county plans and programs at every

opportunity. The basis for coordination county wide will be provided

by the data base created within the county's GIS as a part of Phase

1. The graphic presentation of site characteristics and limitations,

as well as future and proposed land use is the first step toward

logical and consistent growth management county wide. The specific,

practical methods to utilize this information will be further

identified and developed during Phase 2.

SUBTASK 2C: INCREASING MUTUAL SUPPORT BETWEEN COUNTY2 WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT, AND STATE PROGRAMS REGARDING CONTROL OF POLLUTION
INPUTS TO ESTUARINE WATERS.

The mutual cooperation between the county, water management district,

and state and federal programs has already begun. The data collection

process necessary during Phase 1 has helped formulate many professional

relationships between agencies. This joint cooperation is expected to

continue through Phase 2 and beyond.

CHAPTER THREE

WATERSHED HYDROLOGY

TASK 3: ESTABLISH AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE HYDROLOGY OF THE MOULTRIE CREEK
AND MOSES CREEK WATERSHEDS

Preliminary hydrologic information has been gathered for the Moses

Creek and Moultrie Creek Watershed areas.- This information includes

streamflow and rainfall data, aerial photography and United States

Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle maps. From aerial photography and

USGS Quadrangle maps, the drainage basins have been delineated. Capability

for producing extensive mapping is available within the GIS for such

characteristics as drainage basin and soil group delineations, streamflow

and rainfall data, and 1985 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Floodway maps.

SUBTASK 3A: REVIEW AND ASSESS EXISTING UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
(USGS), FEMA AND SJRWMD STREAEFLOW INFORMATION ON THE
MOULTRIE CREEK AND MOSES CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING
RAINFALL AND OTHER PERTINENT INFOR14ATION

Streamflow information for the Moultrie Creek Watershed has been

obtained from USGS Stream Gauge No. 02246900. This gauge is located

at the intersection of Moultrie Creek and State Road 207. Rating curves

have been generated from a plot of gauge height versus discharge

utilizing data from this stream gauge. Stream gauge data is not

available for the Moses Creek Watershed.

Various publications have been reviewed to obtain general hydrologic

information for both watersheds. Two USGS publications, "Low-Flow

Frequency Data for Selected Stream-Gauging Stations in Florida"

(USGS,1985) and the "Technique for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency

of Floods on Natural-Flow Streams in Florida" (USGS,1982) contained

data for the Moultrie Creek Watershed. Information was not available

in these publications for the Moses Creek Watershed.

In addition to the USGS publications discussed above, the 1985

FEMA Flood Insurance Study for St. Johns County, Florida was reviewed

with respect to hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, peak discharge rates,

and flood profiles for the Moses Creek and Moultrie Creek Watersed

areas.

Finally, historical rainfall data for St. Johns County was obtained

from the SJRWMD's publication, "Rainfall Analysi's For' Northeast Florida-

Part I & II" and rainfall quantities were obtained from the United

States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS)

publication, "Rainfall Frequency Atlas of Alabama, Florida, Georgia,

and South Carolina for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return

Periods from 1 to 100 Years".

14
Historical monthly rainfall data for St. Johns County during the period

1957 to 1984 is available in TABLE 7. The maximum yearly rainfall data

for St. Johns County for various duration storms during the period 1960

to 1983 is reported in TABLE 8.

SUBTASK 3B: IDENTIFY NEEDS FOR ADDITIONAL STREAM GAUGES AND INSTALL
AS NEEDED

To provide additional background information for the Moultrie

Creek Watershed, a stream gauge was installed in June, 1988, by the

USGS Jacksonville Office, at the intersection of Moultrie Creek Tributary

No. 4 and State Road 207. The USGS will be responsible for data

collection and maintenance of the stream gauge. However, reliable

information is not expected until Fall 1989 or after. The Moses Creek

Watershed lacks streamflow data and could benefit from the installation

of a stream gauge. However, due to its tidally influenced nature, the

installation of a stream gauge is not possible.

SUBTASK 3C: DOCUMENT EXISTING STREA14FLOW DATA IN TERMS OF:

1. TOTAL AVERAGE FLOWS.

2. SEASONAL AND LONG-TERM EXTREMES.

3. MAJOR AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES.

4. CONTRIBUTING WATERSHED ACREAGES.

5. DISCHARGE VS. FREQUENCY RELATIONSHIPS.

6. STAGE VS. FREQUENCY RELATIONSHIPS.

1. TOTAL AVERAGE FLOWS.

TABLE 1 demonstrates total average flow or discharge rate, (in

cubic feet per second) for USGS Stream Gauge No. 02246900. The mean,

maximum, minimum, and equivalent flows are also provided. TABLE 2

indicates the '10 year, 50 year, 100 year, and 500 year peak' discharges

for Moultrie Creek, Moses Creek and their tributaries.

2. SEASONAL AND LONG-TERM EXTREMES.

Monthly streamflow discharges at USGS Stream Gauge No.02246900

are listed in TABLE 3. Seasonal data is not available for Moultrie

Creek or its tributaries or Moses Creek.

Long-te rm extreme streamflow for Moultrie Creek, as measured

at State Road''207, can be found in TABLE 1. The maximum total discharge

for the period occurred in 1972 and the minimum total discharge was

in 1981. Historical streamflow data is not available for Moses Creek

or other tributaries of Moultrie Creek.

3. MAJOR AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES.

Streamflow data is available at the stream gauge location only

and is provided in TABLES 1 and 3. Floodway data for the major and

minor tributaries of Moses Creek and Moultrie Creek is available in

TABLE 4. This table provides general cross sectional and mean velocity

information for each cross section.
1 6

4. CONTRIBUTING WATERSHED ACREAGES.

The drainage basin acreages for Moses Creek, Moultrie Creek and

their associated tributaries as calculated from the USGS Quadrangle

maps and aerial photographs of the study area, are listed in TABLE

5. These acreages have also been calculated by FE14A and are included

in TABLE 6. The FEMA study does not include all of the drainage basins

defined in this document; however, the areas common to both studies

are found to be similar.

5. DISCHARGE VS. FREQUENCY.

Discharge vs frequency information was obtained from the 1985 FEMA

Flood Insurance Study for the 10 year, 50 year, 100 year, 500 year

storm events for Moultrie Creek, Moses Creek, and their tributaries.

6. STAGE VS FREQUENCY RELATIONSHIPS._

The flood profiles from the 1985 FEMA Flood Insurance Study were

utilized. The stages corresponding to the 10 year, 50 year, 100 year,

and 500 year storm events for Moultrie Creek, Moses Creek, and their

tributaries were obtained.

CHAPTER FOUR

LAND CHARACTERISTICS

Land characteristics have been identified using aerial photographs

with topography. These aerial photographs facilitate the location

and identification of natural and manmade water conveyance and storage

systems, as well as areas of point and non-point pollution sources.

Drainage patterns, soil locations and limitations, and natural resource

areas within the study area are available in the county GIS. From

the ' GIS data, severe soil limitatins can been seen to exist in the

Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek Watersheds. These limitations will

require substantial efforts in the design and planning of the development

of this area. Existing land use information is presently available

in the county's GIS and is being updated via a complementary planning

and zoning department Comprehensive Plan project.

SUBTASK 4A: DELINEATE/MAP TOPOGRAPHY OF THE STUDY AREA

The study area is bounded on the north by State Road 16, the east

by the Matanzas River, the south by State Road 206, and the west by

Interstate 95 (1-95) comprising approximately 54 square miles. Rectified

aerial photographic maps have been prepared under contract for the study

area by St. Johns County at a scale of one inch equals 200 feet with an

elevation contour interval of one foot. Sixty-six aerial photographs

with topography were flown in January 1987 for the project area north

of Moultrie Creek (Contract 87-17) and in january 1988 for the southern

project area (Contract 88-14). Refer to FIGURE 2 for an index of the aerial

photographs by location.

SUBTASK 4B: INVENTORY/MAP NATURAL WATER CONVEYANCE/STORAGE SYSTEM.

In combination, Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek have a drainage

area of approximately 64 square miles in St. Johns County. For the

purpose of drainage basin delineation, approximately 40 square miles

of this area have been considered in detail. These 40 square miles

are bounded, in general, by State Road 16 on the north, * 1-95 on the

west, State Road 206 on the south, and the Matanzas and San Sebastian

Rivers on the east. The watersheds are. significantly affected by

approximately 20 square miles of offsite contributing areas. These

offsite areas extend from State Road 207 north to State Road 16. They

were investigated for two reasons: 1) a significant portion of the

Moultrie Creek drainage system lies north of State Road 207, and 2)

the topographic aerial survey for the area nor th of State Road 207

had already been completed. Refer to FIGURE 2.

The northern portion of the Moultrie Creek drainage basin contains

a total of 45.0 square miles which has 18.2 square miles of an offsite

drainage area;' The remaining 26.8 square miles onsite have been

delineated in detail in FIGURE 3. The southern portion of the Moses

Creek drainage basin contains a total of 19.3 square miles with 6.1

square miles of an offsite drainage area. The remaining 13.2 square

miles onsite have been delineated in detail in FIGURE 3.

Drainage basins have been delineated on. the basis of topographic

data provided by the aerial surveys of the study area. The initial

basin areas were delineated on a set of blue line copies of the aerial

photographs at a scale of one inch equals 200 feet. The basin outlines

have been transferred by means of State Plane Feet coordinates to USGS

Quadrangle maps at a scale of one inch equals 2,000 feet. This

information was in turn entered into the St. Johns County CIS as the
21

BASINS coverage layer. The area of each basin is shown on TABLE 9.

The contributions of offsite drainage areas (i.e. west of 1-95

and south of State Road 206) were estimated on the basis of existing

information provided by the USGS and Florida Department of Transportation

(FDOT). The USGS provided a drainage map for the northwest portion

of Moultrie Creek and FDOT provided drainage maps for the Moses Creek

area and the southern portion of Moultrie Creek.

Tributary designations in this study follow the precedent of the

1985 FEMA Flood Insurance Study for St. Johns County with the exception

of three additional tributaries. These tributaries have been defined

and designated as: Moultrie Creek Tributary A, Moultrie Creek Tributary

B, and Moses Creek Tributary A.

Current study findings were compared with existing information

for the Moultrie Creek basin area west (upstream) of U.S. Highway No.

1. The FEMA study indicates a total basin area of 41.7 square miles

while the present study indicates a total basin area of 42.1 square

miles. This is a difference of 1.0%. A similar comparison for Moses

Creek results in a difference of about 14% for the portion of the Moses

Creek Watersh6d above the confluence of Tributary 1 with the main branch.

The FEMA study indicates a total basin area for this portion of Moses

Creek of 15.8 square miles, while the results of this study have been

estimated as 18.0 square miles. The estimation was necessary due to

the non-specific description of the Moses Creek basin in the FEMA report,

and the lack of a topographic map with drainage basins (not available

from FEMA or their sub-contractors).

Details regarding flood plains and flood prone areas within the

main tributary flow channels are provided by the FEMA Floodway maps

(and FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps where Floodway maps are not

available).

The FEMA maps have been digitized and are now available in the GIS

as the FLOODWAYS coverage layer. FIGURE 4 delineates the floodways

and flood plains within the project area at a scale of one inch equals

one mile. The county GIS can plot this information at any scale

necessary.

The natural drainage system or basins outlined in FIGURE 3, showing

the routing of water through the study area, will form the framework

to support the results of this study.

SUBTASK 4C: INVENTORY/MAP MANMADE WATER CONVEYANCE/STORAGE SYSTEM

The manmade drainage system map depicts the locations of the

major drainage structures within the study area and is shown in FIGURE

5. The structures shown fall into three catagories: bridges, culverts,

and fords. At this time, these items are categorized as culverts

because they share similar discharge characteristics. Further definition

can be provided in the future, if necessary. Each item has been

inventoried according to details such as. the type of structure and

its location, size or diameter, length, and invert elevation as shown

in TABLE 11. These details were obtained from field measurements and

other sources such as FEMA, the FDOT, the Florida East Coast Railroad,

and various subdivision drainage maps*. Field -measurements were not

taken for elevation verification; all elevation figures shown were

obtained from outside sources.

Three major ditches or ditch systems have been identified in the

study area: 1) a drainage ditch beginning approximately two miles

west of 1-95 and continuing in a northeasterly direction into Moultrie

Creek with a total length of approximately four miles; 2) a ditch

adjacent to ind west of U.S. Highway No. 1 continuing in a southerly

direction from Corpus Christi Church parking lot (at Datil Pepper Road

and U. S. Highway No. 1) to the main branch of Moses Creek, with a total

length of approximately 1400 feet; and 3) a system of ditches in and

around the St. Augustine Shores subdivision.

The St. Augustine Shores subdivision contains the only significant

water storage system in the study area. The system consists of a series

of interconnected lakes and ponds.

SUBTASK 4D: DETAILED SOILS SURVEY

USING THE MOST RECENT, DETAILED SOILS INFORMATION, DETERMINE
AND NAP (SCALE: I" = 200')

1. AREAS WHERE SOILS MAY BE LIMITED FOR SEPTIC TANKS, DETENTION/
RETENTION PONDS, INFRASTRUCTURE, ETC.

2. AREAS WHERE SOILS ARE EASILY ERODIBLE AND EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES ARE ESPECIALLY NEEDED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
OFFSITE

In October 1983, the SCS published a detailed soil survey for St.

Johns County, Florida. The soil survey identifies a total of 60 soil

types in the project area. These can be found on TABLE 12. Based

on the soil survey, soil boundaries were digitized and input into the

county GIS. These boundaries are shown on FIGURE 6 according to soil

type. . Note* that due to scale limitations, individual soil numbers

(corresponding to soil name) cannot be shown.

Information pertaining to limitations, related to soil suitability for

use in septic tank, detention/retention pond, and infrastructure areas

was obtained from Tables 3, 10, 11, 13, and 16 of the soil survey.

In general, se,vere limitations are present in a majority of soil types

for all of t he above land use applications. Specifically, moderate

to severe limitations are present in 53 of the 60 soil types for use

in septic tank areas. Refer to FIGURE 7 for an overall location of

soil limitations. Soil limitations due to ponding effects from a

seasonal high water table are present in 12% of the soils. Soil types

exhibiting ponding effects can be found on FIGURE 8. Due to the severe

limitations present, special planning and design would be required

to overcome the soil deficiencies.

Erosion is the removal of rock or soil by such transporting agents as

wind and water. Nonvegetated areas are especially susceptible to erosion

and will require control measures. Implementing control measures will

be further investigated in Phase 2. As a result of Phase 2, Ordinance

86-4 will be modified to incorporate study findings.

Based on correspondence with staff of the SCS, a total of 4 soil

types are areas of concern for erosion. Two soil types (Fripp, of

the Fripp-Satellite Complex, #31 and Pits, #38) are classified as

potentially highly erodible and are found within the project area.

The remaining two soil types (Floridana, #62 and Placid, #63) are

classified as hydric soils and are not found within the project area,

but are areas of concern. The potentially highly erodible soils are

delineated on FIGURE 9.

Further soils information, compiled from the SCS Soil Survey, is

available in' Appendix B.

SUBTASK 4E: IDENTIFY AND MAP I14PORTANT NATURAL RESOURCE AREA OF THE
TWO WATERSHEDS

There are two areas of concern when identifying locations important

as natural resource areas: 1) threatened and endangered species habitat

areas, and 2) wetland areas.

The "Official Lists of Endangered and Potentially Endangered

Fauna and Flora in Florida" was obtained to determine habitat areas.

This publication contains the animal and plants on the federal list

by the United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

(USFWS). It also identifies animals on a state list by the Florida

Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFWFC), and plants on a state

list by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

(FDACS).

There are some differences between the federal and state lists.

Some animals and plants may be endangered or threatened based on their

occurrence on a national level, while in the State of Florida these

animals and plants occur in such large numbers that they are not

considered by," the state agencies as endangered or threatened.

Conversely, some animals and plants, while occurring in large numbers

nationwide, may be declining in their habitats in Florida. As a state

agency, the county should consider the state lists of animals and plants,

while not totally discounting the federal lists. Those animals which

may be found in St. Johns County who appear on these lists are given

in TABLE 34.

The term "endangered" is defined as an animal or plant whose

number has declined to a level citing this species as headed for

extinction unless special efforts are made to protect these species

in order to increase their numbers. The term "threatened" is defined

as a species numbers declining at such a rate that it will become

endangered unless protective efforts are made.

Some species have been labeled, "Threatened Due to Similarity

of Appearance", or T(S/A) by the USFWS. These species are not threatened

by becoming endangered except that outside forces, usually man, are

threatening a similar species and may threaten this species also. An

example of this is the American alligator (Alligator miss iss ippiens is)

which is listed as T(S/A) because the American crocodile (Crocodylus

acutus) is listed as endangered. The state list uses the term "species

of special concern" (SSC) as an alternative to the T(S/A) classification.

These species are being reviewed by state agencies as to their declining

numbers.

Each species has a characteristic habitat in which t hey occur.

The Soil Conservation Society of America (SCSA) has issued a publication

which describes the characteristics of the habitats in Florida in terms

of soils, vegetation, animals, land use, and endangered and threatened

plants and animals. The "26 Ecological Communities of Florida" (SCSA,
1987) includes' a detailed description of each community. TABLE 35

gives the ecological communities by number and name and notes those

communities which occur in St. Johns County as determined by the Florida

SCS. The concept of ecological communities is based on the awareness

that a soil type commonly supports a specific vegetative community,

which in turn provides the habitat needed by specific wildlife species.

Ecological community occurrence is dependent on several environmental

factors. Within a specific area, however, the type of soil is the

most influential factor. Appendix A of the above publication contains

a listing of the soil series in Florida and those ecological communities

that these soils can support. Some soil series are found with only one

community type, while others may support several communities. However,

where more than one community has been found, the change can usually

be attributed to plant successional stages or regional location

differences within the state.

TABLE 36 contains the ecological communities found in St. Johns

County and those soils which may support them. A soil may support

various communities depending on depth to water, flooding frequency,

and plant successional stages. TABLE 37 makes this apparent by listing

the ecological communities that "may" be found in each soil type. TABLE

36 and TABLE 37 contain complementary information which may make the

relationship between soil types and ecological communities more apparent.

The association of an ecological community with a soil type does not

absolutely mean that where that soil oc curs this community will be

found. At this time site inspection is still necessary for verification.

This is especially true because the ecological community which occurs

on a site may be altered in times of drought or by clearing the area

by man or by ;fire. Because clearing an area may destroy an area of

a critical habitat, serious consequences can occur to wildlife.

Appendix@@'B of the "26 Ecological Communities of Florida" contains

a listing of plants by ecological community occurence. This information

is intended only as a guide and does not claim to contain all plants

occurring in Florida. By drawing from plant range and site description

in a number of botanical references and from field knowledge, Florida

SCS plant scientists were able to prepare this data.

Similar information for animals is given in Appendix C of the

same source. TABLE 38 contains the animals from this Appendix that

occur in the "central" climatic zone, where St. Johns County is located,

and those animals that occur in the ecological communities of St. Johns

County. TABLE 38 can be used to show in which ecological community

an animal may be found. The term "characterizing" is described as

an animal that is one of the characteristic animals of this ecological

community. The ecological community could then be tied to soils for

possible location although site inspection would still be necessary.

Wetland areas are the other important natural resource areas.

Wetlands, as defined by the SJRWMD, are hydrological sensitive areas

which are identified by being inundated Pr saturated by surface or

groundwater with a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and

under normal circumstances does support, a prevalence of vegetation

typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands

generally include swamps, marshes*, bogs, aInd similar areas.

Hydrologically sensitive areas, including wetlands, are areas whose

hydrology and hydraulics, are valuable because of their importance

to fish and wildlife and their capacity to maintain water quality,

recharge groundwater, and store flood waters.

In Florida, there are four levels of regulatory control for projects

located in wet lands: federal - COE, state - DER, regional water

management districts and regional planning councils, and local county

governments. For St. Johns County the regional governmental bodies

are the SJRWMD and the Northeast Florida Regional Planning Council

(NEFRPC).

These regulatory agencies try to avoid impacts to wetlands through

development, minimize unavoidable impacts, and restore the function

of equivalent wetlands. Major impacts to wetlands from development

results from the following activities: clearing, filling, and grading

of wetlands; ditching and draining of wetlands and water bodies;

pollution from stormwater run off and other discharges; and flooding

due to diversion of flow and loss of storage capacity in thewatershed.

Development due to continued growth in Florida will continue to impact

Florida's wetlands, while regulatory agencies continue to protect them.

Each regulatory agency has its own definition and permitting policies

for wetlands.

The SJRWMD defines wetlands using the vegetative index, which

is based on the percentage of the areal extent of the submerged and

transitional species, and/or the soils index. Hydric soils have the

characteristic of being inundated or saturated on an average of 30

consecutive days per year. St. Johns County has a SCS Soil Survey
1
and the SJRWMD has published a soils index for the hydric soils. The

hydric soils contained in St. Johns County include:

Bakersville,muck, #69

Beaches, #28Bluff sandy clay loam, frequently flooded, #42

Durbin Muck, frequently flooded, #52

Floridana fine sand, frequently flooded, #18

Holopaw fine sand, frequently flooded, #47

Hontoon Muck # 35

Manatee fine sandy loam, frequently flooded, #22

Moultrie fine sand, frequently flooded, #49

Myakka fine sand, depressional, #4

Parkwood fine sandy loam, frequently flooded, #25

Pellicer silty clay loam, frequently flooded, #24

Riviera fine sand, depressional, #61

Riviera fine sand, frequently flooded, #36

Samsula muck, #26

St. Johns fine sand, depressional, #5

Terra Ceia Muck, frequently flooded, #66

Tisonia mucky peat, frequently flooded, #67

Tomoka muck, #41

Westconnett fine sand, frequently flooded, #30

Winder fine sand, frequently flooded, #48

FIGURE 10 shows the hydric soils found in the project area and is a

preliminary wetlands map based upon the hydrologically sensitive soils

index defined by the SJRWMD.

The "Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the

United States" (USFWS, 1979) defines wetlands as lands transitional

between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually

at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For

purposes of this classification, wetlands must have one or more of

the following three attributes: (1) at least periodically, the land

supports predominantly hydrophytes, (2) the substrate, or underlying

layer, is predominantly an undrained hydric soil, and (3) the substrate

is nonsoil arid, is saturated with water or covered by shallow water

at some time during the growing season of each year. Hydrophytes are

those plants which grow in water on a substrate that is a least

periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content.

Supplementary to this publication are the USGS Quadrangle size maps

at a scale of one inch equals 2,000 feet which show very specific wetland

and deepwater habitats.

The USFWS definition depends on a list of hydrophytes, or wetland

plants, and a list of hydric soils. The USFWS publication, "Wetland

Plants of the State of Florida 1986" the USDA SCS publication, "Hydric

Soils of the State of Florida 1985" and as the paper quadrangle maps

of the wetlands habitat have been obtained. These habitat maps have

not been entered into the GIS at the time of this report.

NOTE: The SJRWMD is in the process of producing a wetlands map

for the project area which is scheduled for completion in late 1989.

This map will contain information based on aerial photographic

interpretation and ground truthing of vegetation. The information

will be at a scale of one inch equals 2,000 feet (Quadrangle scale)

and ready to be entered into the county GIS.*

Additionally, Landmark Technologies, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida

has prepared a county map using SPOT satellite imagery with a spatial

resolution (pixel size) of 20 meters by 20 meters, or about one tenth

of an acre. Wetland categories were defined by both vegetation and

environmental characteristics. This SPOT classification data should

be available for the county GIS by the middle of 1989.

These maps from SJRWMD and Landmark Technologies will supplement previous

maps of wetlands that have been compiled.

SUBTASK 4F: MAP AND ASSESS EXISTING LAND USES AND AREA WHERE FLOODING
PROBLEMS EXIST

USING THE MOST RECENT LAND USE INFORMATION, SUPPI, NTED BY
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGIC INFOR14ATION

1. MAP LAND USES IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ESTI14ATE STOR14WATER
RUN-OFF TO ADJACENT WATER BODIES

2. IDENTIFY RESIDENTAL FLOODING PROBLEMS, SEPTIC TANKS IN FLOOD
PRONE AREAS, EROSION INTO WATER COURSES, AND OTHER FLOOD
PROBLEMS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

Exi.sting land use data has been entered into the county GIS system

within a file known as the LANDUSE coverage. This data was acquired

through an information sharing system with- the St. Johns County Planning

and Zoning Department via existing county land use generated using

SPOT satellite imagery. Contract No. 87-095.01 provides the GIS LANDUSE

.coverage including ground cover as seen by the SPOT satellite. Since

the contract is not completed at this time, Landmark Technologies Inc. ,

Jacksonville, Florida has furnished a map at 1:24,000 scale (one inch

equals 2,000 feet). This information has been digitized and coded

into the GIS as a temporary LANDUSE coverage until the contract for

SPOT data is completed.

The LANDUSE" coverage, FIGURE 11, contains existing land use for

the project ar,ea for the following classifications:

1. Residential

a. Low Density, 110
b. Medium Density, 120
C. High Density, 130
d. Mobile Home Parks, 102

2. Commercial, 140

3. Industrial, 150

4. Institutional, 170

These classifications follow those established in the "Florida Land

Use, Cover and Forms Classification System" (FDOT, 1985). These

4 2

classifications were designed by FDOT to provide a consistent means

of classifying land use throughout Florida. Level I land use data

is very general in nature. "Urban and Built-up" is the Level I

classification for land that consists of areas of intensive use with

much of the land occupied by manmade structures. Level II land use

data is more specific and may be obtained from high altitude imagery

and falls under the Level I classification "Urban and Built-up".
Residential land uses range from I high-density urban housing
developments to low-density rural areas characterized by a relatively

small number of homes per acre. The subclasses of residential land

use are based on the number of dwelling units per acre. The residential

subclasses are defifidd as follows:

1. Low Density Residential : Less than two dwelling units per acre.

2. Medium Density Residential : Greater than or equal to two but
less than or equal to five dwelling units per acre.

3. High Density Residential : Greater than five dwelling units
per acre.

The classification "Mobile Home Park" has been reserved for mobile

home parks or subdivisions with more than five units per acre. In

the case of one or only a few mobile homes within one of the other

residential classifications, the Mobile Home classification has not

been delineated. Because the Mobile Home Parks have not been classified

at Level III or 132, the 102 classification was derived for this study.

Commercial areas are predominantly associated with the distribution

of products and services. This includes shopping centers and commercial

strip developments, resorts, retail, wholesale, professional services,

cultural, entertainment, tourist services, oil and gas storage, and

cemeteries.

The Industrial classification is comprised of those land uses where

manufacturing, assembly or processing of materials and products are

accomplished. This includes food processing, timber processing, mineral

processing, oil and gas processing, other light industry, and other

heavy industry. Light industry includes steel fabrication, small boat

manufacturing, electronic manufacturing, and assembly plants. Heavy

industry includes major ship repair, ship building, and large lumber

mills.

The Institutional classification includes land use associated with

educational, religious, health, military, governmental, and correctional

facilities.

The ground 'Cover information provided by the SPOT satellite will

introduce further classifications, some of which will include

agricultural, various forest cover, and wetlands.

Stormwater generated from urban land uses is significant because

it can carry pollution from these urban areas into adjacent water bodies.

FIGURE 12 shows the existing land uses and the watersheds for the project

area.

The topogriphy of the basin determines the path that the stormwater

run off will follow. The drainage basins delineated in FIGURE 12 have

been plotted to a scale equal to the topographic aerial photographs

(one inch equals 200 feet). The topographic aerial photographs have

then been overlaid by the basin map to determine the course of the

stormwater run off. This was performed by the St. Johns County

Engineering Department using the CIS.

Pollutants, such as litter, pesticides, oil, gas, etc. from urban

and agricultural land uses that discharge into water bodies can cause

serious environmental consequences. The existence of pollution sources

within flood prone areas will facilitate the spread of pollutants by

47
flood waters from these sources. This is especially important regarding

non point pollution sources.

RESIDENTIAL FLOODING PROBLEMS

Residential flooding problems are identified by observing areas

of residential land use and flood prone areas. Flood prone areas have

been identified on the basis of soils which are prone to flooding as

well as by areas which lie within the flood plains of Moses and Moultrie

Creeks and their tributaries.

FIGURE 13 outlines areas of residential land use and areas that

lie within the flood plains. Other urban flooding problems may be

seen in FIGURE 14 which shows areas of urban land use and areas within

the flood plain boundaries.

TABLES 24 to 29 contain information on flood prone areas based on

soil characterist'fts:!@- and are located in Appendix B. TABLE 39 gives

information on the frequency and duration of flooding and the time

of year when flooding is most likely to occur.

Frequency, duration, and probable dates of occurrence are estimated.

Frequency is expressed as none, rare, common, occasional, and frequent.

None is defined as flooding that is not probable, rare that it is

unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions, common that

it is likely under normal conditions, occasional that it occurs, on

the average, no more than once in two years, and frequent that it occurs

on the average more than once in two years. Duration is expressed

as very brief if less than two days, brief if two to seven days, and

long if more than seven days. Probable dates are expressed in months.

For example, November - May indicates that flooding can occur during

the period November through May.

The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely

thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater,

an irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth,

and the absence of distinctive horizons that form in soils that are

not subject to flooding.

Also considered is local information about the extent and levels

of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic

floods. Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is

less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that

delineate flood prone areas at specific flood frequency levels.

FIGURE 15 shows areas of residential land use and areas that have

soils with flooding characteristics. Other related urban *flooding"'

problems may be seen in FIGURE 16.

TABLE 40 also contains information on flood -prone areas based on

soil characteristics. From this table, info rmation about soil

limitations for dwelling units with and without basements refers to

residential areas. Those soils with limitations due to flooding, as

well as residential areas of land use, are shown in FIGURE 17. These

soils in addition to those soils limited for small commercial sites

(see TABLE 41) are shown with other urban areas in FIGURE 18.

By observing which residential areas are prone to flooding, areas

in which further investigation should be considered are located. The

exact location of a flooding problem will be dictated by topography

and available drainage facilities. These can be observed on the

topographic aerial photographs. The information in these figures has

been plotted at a scale of one inch equals 200 feet with the county

GIS and then over laid on the topographic aerial photographs.

SEPTIC TANKS IN FLOOD PRONE AREAS

Areas that have septic tanks in high densities and areas that are

prone to flooding by being within the flood plain are shown in FIGURE

19. Sewage treatment plants (STP) and areas with sewer service are

also included.

Areas that have soils with flooding characteristics (see TABLE 39)

and areas with high density septic tanks, sewage treatment plants and

areas of sewer service are shown in FIGURE -20. Also, flood prone areas

based on soil limitations for dwelling units are shown in FIGURE 21.

Erosion into water courses may occur on any vegetated site. The

amount of sediment carried away from a site depends on the cohesiveness

of the soil, the size of the grains, the energy and velocity of the

water, the shape of the channel, and the vegetation holding the soil.

Only the potentially highly erodible soils are of concern in this area.

These soils are Fripp-Satellite complex, #31 and Pits, #38, and of

moderate concern are Floridana fine sand, #62 and Placid fine sand,

#63. These soils as well as the water courses and their basins

are shown in FIGURE 22. From this figure, the water courses that might

be affected by these soils can be seen. Erosion is normally linked

to vegetation, or lack of it, which will be easily seen from the SPOT

satellite imagery.

SUBTASK 4C: IDENTIFY POINT AND NON-POINT POLLUTION SOURCES

The drainage basins for Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek lie to

the south and west of the city of St. Augustine. This area includes

a wide variety of land uses ranging from forest and timber land to

residential and commercial development. As a result there is a wide

variety of potential pollution inputs to the Moultrie Creek and Moses

Creek Watersheds. Point and Non-point Pollution Source map FIGURE

23.

The term "point source" refers to a source of pollution which enters

the drainage system at a particular location, i.e. , the outfall of

a sewage treatment plant. "Non-point" sources are those sources

associated with storm water run-off from a particular area of land

rather than a speci fic point such as a high density residential area

with septic tanks.

Note that although the features shown on the Point and Non-point

ap are referred to as "pollution sources", they may or may not be active

sources; it is ..more correct to consider them to be potential pollution

sources.

Twenty point sources have been identified by this study and they

fall into three catagories; 1) large STP (STP with a capacity of 500,000

GPD or greater), 2) package plant (a small STP serving apartment

complexes, small subdivisions, or small commercial sites), and 3)

industrial wastewater treatment plants. TABLE 42 identifies the

properties of the sewage treatment plants as they are numbered in FIGURE

23. All point sources shown on the map have been located by property

boundaries. No attempt has been made to find exact locations within

property boundaries.
60

The twelve identified non-point sources fall into either of two

categories: 1) high density septic areas, and 2) septic tank sludge

disposal areas.

The aerial photographs (scale I"=200') were used to locate the high

density septic tank areas. The areas outlined depict residential areas

with densities of 0.3 units per acre or greater where no municipal

or commercial sewer service is available. TABLE 43 lists the names

of these areas as they are numbered in FIGURE 23. The names of the

areas with commercial sewer service appear in TABLE 44.

Three septic tank sludge disposal areas are shown. These are

areas where sludge has been or is currently being spread.

Stormwater run-off from densely developed commercial or urban areas

is an important non-point source that is not shown on the point and

non-point pollution source map, but still should be considered. This

type of pollution is associated with the clearing of the ground that

occurs during a rain storm. Obviously, the material that is washed

from the ground goes somewhere; usually it goes to the nearest creek
or water cour ;e. This is a problem when pollutants, such as litter,

motor oils, :g'asoline, fertilizers, pesticides, etc., have been left

on the ground where there is significant development. In the study

area, commercial development is most prevalent along U.S. Highway No.

1, north of Moultrie Creek, while urban development is most, prevalent

in the St. Augustine South and St. Augustine Shores (the "Shores")

area, see FIGURE 11. The "Shores", being a newer subdivision,. was

(and is being) designed and built with some of the current concepts

of storm water management in mind.

Excavation sites are considered to be potential point sources

as loose soil can easily be tranported offsite causing sedimentation

and/or turbidity problems. There are several active excavation sites

in or near the study area, particularly north of State Road 207 along

Holmes Boulevard.

There are no landfills in the study area, although the St. Johns

County landfill on Tillman Ridge Road, is just west of and adjacent

to the Moultrie Creek drainage basin. This area is drained by McCullough

Creek into the St. Johns River. The landfill should have no effect

on the study area.

Two solid waste transfer stations, although not in the study area

or the Moultrie and Moses Creek drainage basin, have a potential

pollution impact on the Matanzas River. One, located on the west end

of 16th Street in St. Augustine Beach, drains directly into the Matanzas

River. The other, located on Pacific Boulevard, drains into the Matanzas

River via San Sebastian Creek and Red House Branch.

CHAPTER FIVE

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

TASK 5: ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION DEVELOPED IN TASKS I THROUGH 4.

This task involves the compilation and interpretation of all pertinent

information generated within the previous four tasks for use as the basis

of a basin management plan. This plan will be formulated during Phase

2 of DER Contract No. CM 217.

SUBTASK 5A: ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION PROBLEMS
OF EXISTING LAND USES.

Potential erosion problems occur in areas that include potentially

erodible soils, cultivated soils, or soils stripped of vegetation.

The location of the highly erodible soils within the project area were

previously described in Subtask 4D and shown in FIGURE 9.

A concern not specifically shown in FIGURE 9, is the areas of

soils that are stripped of vegetation while construction projects are

in progress. It is during this period@ that soil erosion resulting

from stormwater run-off occurs on the bare soils and soil embankments.

This can result in turbidity of streams if not controlled and monitored

during construction.

The upgrading of compliance inspections during the construction

phase of projects can help alleviate the erosion and turbidity problems

caused by the stormwater run-off,

Some of the drainage improvement methods that will be investigated

in Phase 2 of this project include culvert types, detent ion/re tent ion

pond vegetatiqn', alternative pavement materials such as semi-pervious

paving blocks, as well as incentives for erosion and turbidity

protection.

SUBTASK 5B: ESTIMATES OF THE ABILITY OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TO
ACCOMODATE EXISTING RUN-OFF VOLUMES AND EVALUATION OF
CURRENT LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS TO MANAGE THESE SYSTEMS
IN A WAY THAT WILL ENSURE FUTURE CAPACITY AND PROTECT
WATER QUALITY.

The project area contains two significant housing developments

that impact the handling of stormwater run-off. These areas are St.

Augustine Shores and St. Augustine South.

The St. Augustine Shores Subdivision is located south of Moultrie

Creek and north of Moses Creek. This subdivision utilizes an engineering

water storage system consisting of a series of interconnected lakes

and ponds for stormwater management. Subsequently, minimal flooding

problems occur in this area.

The St. Augustine South Subdivision, located north of Moultrie

Creek, was constructed when development plans did not specifically

address stormwater management. There are numerous areas within this

subdivision that experience frequent flooding problems. Using the

topographic aerial photographs, many of the flooding areas are readily

identified.

Additionally, information is being collected from the St. Johns

County Road and Bridge Department concerning specific residential

flooding problems. A record-keeping procedure is being explored whereby

the county will be able to maintain records of specific flooding

.complaints, locations, actions taken, priorities, costs, etc.

St. Johns County Ordinance 86-4 addresses the retention of

stormwater within project boundaries of all subdivisions, multifamily,

commercial, industrial, and institutional projects as previously

described in Task 2.

SUBTASK 5C: GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT
AND FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES ON IMPORTANT HABITAT AND OTHER
AREAS IDENTIFIED IN TASK 4 AS NEEDING SPECIAL PROTECTION.

Wetland areas, as important natural resource areas, were previously

described in Subtask 4E and shown in FIGURE 10.

There are four levels of regulatory control for the protection

of Florida's wetlands. These include the COE at the federal level,

the DER at the state level, the SJRWMD and the NEFRPC at the regional

level, and the St. Johns County government at the local level. The

impact of project development on wetlands is closely monitored on an

individual project basis in each step of the permitting process.

The production of wetlands maps based on soils by the SCS,. on

vegetation by the SJRWMD, and on satellite imagery by LANDMARK

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. will greatly enhance the county's ability to identify

and monitor the association of land use and wetland areas.

The need to compile maps and information of large natural resource

areas increases the necessity for utilizing the county GIS as an

efficient tool,-for the effective management of these areas.

SUBTASK 5D: PROPOSED STRACEGY FOR INCORPORATING THESE FINDINGS WITHIN
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S MULT-DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROCESS TO PROVIDE DIRECT PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF PROJECT
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

The information collected in Phase 1 of this project is to be utilized

in the development of a comprehensive stormwater management program as

defined in Phase 2.

These findings are to be used to refine the St. Johns County Ordinance

86-4. They will also be used to refine St. 'Johns County's Comprehensive

Plan to address the sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water,

and natural aquifer recharge elements.

Additionally, pertinent sections of Chapter 40C-4 of the Florida

Administrative Code relating to the management and storage of surface

waters, as well as Chapter 40C-42 relating to stormwater discharge, are

to be incorporated into Ordinance 86-4.

TABLES

The following tables have been produced from data which is in the

county GIS.

PAGE I

TABLE 1: TOTAL AVERAGE YEARLY STREAMFLOWS IN CUBIC FEE-i PER SECOND

TOTAL FLOW MEAN FLOW MAXIMUM FLOW MINIMUM FLOW EQUIVALENT FLOW
YEAR (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (c-fs/sq. riiiie)

C). ijD I
@4 6, 'j- 1. 2 11--,. 15 33. 2,C) 679. oc)

1970 8142.29 22. 30 512. oc) o. c),2 1.13

113-11 1805. 58 4.95 0 1 E5

19@2 13456. 14 36.8o 479. (.).36 1.86

1973 9008.96 24. 70 219. Ou 0.03 1.25

1974 5180. 2G, 14.20 465.00 o.13 72

1975 3909. 46 10. 70 5,D15. 00 0. cl 0. 54

1976 P447. 33 F1.69 97.00 0.1o 0.34

1977 2490. 90 6.82 119. 00 0. 02 Z@-4

1978 3057. 45 8.38 192.00 o.02 0. 42'

1979 11 E-71. 14 3LI. 00 6,53. 00 0. 09 I.Fl

1 3 8 If- 7 1 !(-,.40 2G9. 0. 04 Cf. 5 3

1981 8(--)4. 33 2. 2C) 42. 00 0. 00 0. 11

11382- IoSG9.84 29.8o 455.(.)() 0.42 1.50

1983 11884. 10 32.60 2 f-, --, - 0 0 0. 31 1.64

1984 75(.)--,. 04 20.50 22@@ 00 0. 11 1. 04

1985 8067. 10 22. 10 327. 00 0. 02 1.12

2351.44 6.44 a 1. 100 0.03 0.33

FAGE

TADLE E: PEAK DISCHARGES FOR m-OULTRIH @4,1) PIDSFS CREEX'S

FLOOD TRIB COMMENTS ABOUT LOCATION PEAK DIS CHARGES (--@fi;)
SOURCE NO. OF CROSS-SECTION 0YR 50YR 00YR 500YR

MOSES o AT CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEEK TRIBUTARY NO. 1 99 8 7 1744 i.-,, 12o :,:, 163

1 -1 ARY ' -76
AT CONFLUENCE OF MOSLS CREEK TR I BU NO. E' 918 1626 1, -)f E:, qtD5

AT CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 5 Glo 1436 1,748 C-. 622

210 390 483 779
AT SR LOE

-5
DOWNSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 6 642 1145 1,394 10

up,sTREAM OF CONFLUENCE OF: MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 5 7L7 1292 1, 57:5 E, 367

UPSTREAM OF CONFLUEr-,,lCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 0 395 714 873 1, -38

I-- AT MOUTH 135 248 304 466

2 AT MOUTH 6o !15 143 223

3 AT MOUTH 78 148 i82 2,78

4 ABOUT 3500 FT UPSTREAM FROM MOUTH 151 281 349 568

AT MOL17H 2:@9 436 535 830

5 ABOUT 4()()(:) FT UPSTREAM OF MOUTH 71 1134 iss 2*78

AT MOUTH 173 318 390 Flo I

6 AT MOUTH 377 662 834 1,276

MiOULTRIE 0 AT CONFLUENCE OF MOUTRIE CREEK NO. 3 1980 3480 4',215 E,, 190

AT FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY 960 1850 2,300 3, 64C.)

-A--
AT S i i t:. ROAD 207 1130 2200 2,750 4, 34,'-)

AT U. S. ROUTE I 2o89 3619 4, 375 6,4119

1 AT MOUTH 236 430 526 7cY9

AT U.S. ROUTr- 165 303 372 5 7 0

AT MOU I Fl, 1-@4 ji 5 5 4 650

4 AT MOUTH 6A. E-94 .348 9

AT STATE ROAD 207 153 269 35 9 58 1

UPSTREAM OF KINGS ESTATES ROAD 208 3 8 7 480 '772

3/13/89 PAGE I

TABLE 3: MONTHLY STREAMFLOW DISCHARGE' IN CUBIC FEET "ER SECOND

YEAR JAN FEB PiAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG -- E P OCT NOV DEC

1969 115.10 2137. 00 1062. 30 113 1. 55 1 14. 57 15.81 S. 21 10S. 63 32 7 63. 10 4369. 00 149 4 @ Q () 1048. 90

1970 2358. 00 2542.0o !(-.)24. 50 1278. l3o i 7. 77 L@l. 51 225. 10 @197.26 226.8C.) 12. 56 rl. 1.38 11 . C-10

197 1 18. 96 125.56 156. 55 2 5 S. Lt C, 19.73 1. 58 30. 47 20. J2 11.18 IS4.05 7-.,.24 902. 90

1972 691.7o 1398.oO 3u,9. 9C.) 60o. 30 1.391. o0 117o. 13 698.4o 1 1,37. 15 2319. G(-') 1 C)So. GO 1554. 40 1505. 00

1973 963. 00 1427.00 597. 00 1455. 60 187.C.)4 G79. 70 361. 50 1386. 40 569. 00 932. 6f.) 182. 50 247. 70

1974 156.130 109.30 136.22 32.88 91.73 1863.52 1075. 370 1 175. C.)O 515C.). 90 113.39 5. 16 1 2

1975 4 8. 4,=-' 2,@ 3. 89 C-0. 86 10. 91 2. 17 21.08 156. 46 @"3. 30 293. 5 1 2662. 4C.) 261. 90 54.56

1976 133.70 65.67 33.33 49. '34 243.30 G 12. 90 316.49 11.72 '36. 52 5. 86 9. 14 '328. 78

1977 1199. 00 411.1,)0 6' D. 24 13.40 S. 1. 7 8. 97 1.90 3. 20 15.66 4.33 80. 66 E-77. 2()

1978 565. SO 928. 90 1365. 70 65.84 3G. @9 7. '25 7.81 52.21 6.1-4 4.94 3. G- Q 12.94

1979- 438. 87 450. 70 475.4C.) 10. 49 86.84 11 G. 5(- 53(.-4.131 228 1. 00 417.20 13 9 9. 3 0
55.01 632.96

1980 1134. 3-0 572. W 1398.40 560.60 100. 39 8.69 6.18 3.77 2.136 3.06 8.14 15.49

'1981 6.21+ 18.51 44.1:92: 22.71 0. 41 0. 41 0.79 203. 67 140. 159 19. 06 2., 6. 2, 0 u. 60

478.50 144.00 337.80 1379. 00 132.78 266 1. 00 917.60 1616.oo 652.40 1799.00 396. 80 155.0o

11383 449. 60 1822. 00 2464. 00 1654. 00 351.PO 336.70 272.67 346.08 335. 60 1759.50 704. 90 1387.30

1984 !iF,3.(-)O 1 13(-"). 30 879.50 778.40 36-o 15. 03 43C.).90 50. 77 1665.61 B6o. SO 281. OC) 111.70

39. 90--- 70. 53 119. 36 35.69 2.62 1. 68 17.55 501. 69 4119. 00 1757. 00 1 5. 0 0 107. 10

1966 6o4. GO 836. GO 636. 40 65. 02 8.35 11.22 7.82 10. 46 16. 93 2S.8C.) 47.o(-) 78. 30

1987 140. 50 2.243. 50 11373. 00 809. 70 9.14 2. 26 1.15 0. 0. 72 2.87 9999.99 ':.4999. 99

PAGE I

TABLE 4: MOULTkl-:` AIN;D MOSES CREEKS FLDODWAY DATA

CROSS DISTANCE WIDTH AREA VELOCITY
CREEK/TRIBUTARY SEC-,"!ON (ft) (ft) (sq ft) (fps)

MOSES CREEK A 616 3,171 o.7

B 12, 700 446 E:, 967 0. 7

C 16, 450 466 3,614 C). 6

D 24, G90 2 21 6 1,928 1. C)

E 26, CJ90 294 1,833 1. 1

F 27,890 461 2,762 0. 7

G 32, 690 1,296 1.2

H 32, 980 73 486 3.2

1 34,800 374 2,(.)54 (:). 6

1 36, 750 64 344 4.6

K 38, 2og 313 1,713 o.5

L 42,149 483 1,,460 o.6

M 42,431 72 43o 2.0

MOSES CREEK NO I A 700 55 163 1.9

B 1,230 22 93 3.3

C 5, 230 53 134 2.3

D 5,640 17 85 3.6

MOSES CREEK NO 2 A 320 20 60 2.4

148 0.2
B 1,998 931

C 3,698 127 561 0.2

D 6,148 140 232 0. 4

()c)
MOSES CREEK NO 3 A 39 82 2

1? .2, 1 lo 6 31 5.8

MOSES CREEK NO 4 A 330 64 421 1.3

E3 B 930 49 233 2.3

c 3,500---- 67---- 268--- -1-.3

PAGI

TABLE 4: MOULTRIE AND MOSES CREEKS FLOODWAY DATA

CROSS DISTANCE WIDTH AREA VELOCITY
CREEK/TRIBUTARY SECTION (ft) (ft) (sq ft) (fps)

MOSES CREEK NO 5 A 60o 52 2@X i. 61

B 4,()4(. 2(:)C) 0. S,

MOSES CREEK NO 6 A 500 io4 2.5

B 8(.-)() 23 179 4.7

C 3,663 167 484 1.7

MOULTRIE CREEK A 4, 800 171 1, 3E.'a 3.2

8 7, 9C.)0 399 2,353 1.9

C 8,380 148 1,107 4.0

14,617 172 3,3 8

15,990 1, 066 8, 036 5

2o,760 457 3,087 1.4

6 24, 960 411 3,610 i. I

H 30,15o 359 2,193 1.4

1 35,550 241 1, 700 1.6

1 35, 805 365 2,242 1.2

K 3 13, 10 5 262 1, 503 1.8

L 42-; 615 240 1,693 1.4

M 45,433 1, 131 4,774 5

MOULTRIE CREEK NO I A 1, o5c) 23 142 3.7

B 4,750 99 387 1.o

C 5,710 134 392 0.9

D G,757 48 63

E 7, 129 51-3 1819 2. 0

F 9,129 41 1.26 3. 0

G 10,129 F, 35 4.9

@@,@DUUTR I E- CREEK NO -3 A 1, 800 74 268 1.6

P A G E

TABLE 4: MOULTRIE AND MOSES CREE@'S FLOODWAY DATA

CROSS DISTANCE WIDTH AREA VELOCII-Y
CREEK/TRIBUTARY SECTION (ft) (ft) (sq ft) (fps)

MOULTRIE CREEV NO 3 B 5,800 9o 1.4

MOULTRIE CREEK NO 4 A 1, o0c) 86 2E5 2.5

B 2, A-00 '114 449 1.5

c E-', 87(.-) F, 137 4. 9

D 6,o05 96 447 1.5

E 7. 195 87 453 1.5

F 9.305 112 409 1.2

G 11,245 111 486 1. 0

14,295 226 G72 u.7

16,023 17 119 3. 0

3/ 13/89 PAGE

TABLE 5. DRAINAGE BASIN ACREAGES

AREA
NAME OP BAS I N (sq ft) ACRES sq ro i 1 es

- 1. E+-,- 9 0. 000 t:@. (y-)(j

MOSE-S CREEr, TRIBUTARY 6 1. LE+08 2, 73-3. 25i@

MOULTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY 4 1. 0E+06 ;R. 313. 8+74 E

MOULTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY 3 3. OE+07 C-1 8 a. 2 S 4 1. 075

MOULTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY 5 2.GE+o7 598.468 o.1335

MOSES CREEK MAIN BRANCH E 1.8E+07 40F,. 393 0. G35

MOULTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY 1 5. C)E+07 151. (-)30 1. 798

,-l-MOULTRIE- CREEK TRIDUIARY A 2. 1 E+07 488.522 7L3

MOULTRIE CREEK MAIN BRANCH E S. 6E+C)E 196. 7(:)2 0. 307

MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY A 1. 5E-+.(.)7 34(.). 619 0. 5212

MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY 4 i. 3E+(j7 298. 127 G. 46L

MOSES CREEK MAIN BRANCH S 1.2E+07 272.557 0. 42L

MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY 1 1. 4E+t:)7 314. 830 o.492

MOULTRIE CREEK MAIN BRANCH N 2. 8E+08 G, 427. 000 10. 041

MOULTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY 8 F,.7E+07 1,542.421 2.4110

MiDULTRIE CREEK MAIN BRANCH S 1. i4E+08 3, 2:@2. 7G5 5. 051

MOSES CREEK-- MAIN BRANCH W 1. ()E+08 2,353.023 3.676

mOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY 5 4. 0E+(D7 911.759 1. 42!5

MOULTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY 2 2. 4E+07 546.19o o.653
MOSES CREEK 1.5E+07 355.463 C). 555

MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY 3 1.9E+07 443.415 o.r.93

3/14/89 PAGE 1

TABLE 6: DRAINAGE BASIN ACREAGES AS FOUND BY FEMA

FLOOD TRIB COMMENTS ON LOCATION DRAINAGE AREA
SOURCE NO. OFCROSS-SECTION (sq miles)

MOSES 0 AT CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 1 15.0
AT CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 2 14.6
AT CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 5 10.6
AT SR 206 2.7
DOWNSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 6 7.1
UPSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 5 8.6
UPSTEAM OF CONFLUENCE OF MOSES CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 6 3.8
1 AT MOUTH 0.5
2 AT MOUTH 0.8
3 AT MOUTH 0.6
4 ABOUT 3500 FT UPSTREAM FROM MOUTH 1.4
AT MOUTH 1.6
5 ABOUT 4000 FT UPSTREAM FROM MOUTH 0.5
AT MOUTH 0.9
6 AT MOUTH 3.3
MOULTRIE 0 AT CONFLUENCE OF MOUTRIE CREEK TRIBUTARY NO. 3 35.7
AT FLORIDA EAS COAST RAILWAY 17.5
AT STATE ROAD 207 19.8
AT U.S. ROUTE 1 41.7
1 AT MOUTH 1.5
AT U.S. ROUTE 1 1.0
3 AT MOUTH 0.7
4 AT MOUTH 4.1
AT STATE ROAD 207 2.6
UPSTREAM OF KINGS ESTATES ROAD 3.5

PA13E I

TABLE 7: MONTHLY AND ANNUAL RAINFALL IN INCHES FOR ST JOHNS COUNTY NEAR ST AUGUSTIN;7

TOTAL YEARLY
YEAR JAN FEB M14R APR M. A'y JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC RAINFALL

1957 (-).58 3.44 4.91 1.42 8. 09 6.2(-) 10. A C) 11. :,@.C) E-. L4 5. 07 1. 51 1.50 62. 66

1958 4.69 3.17 IS. 65 4.31 il. 88 3.54 3.74 2. 84 4.65 11 . 74 3.0! 4. 22- 5ti. 44

1953 4. 70 2.85 9.72 5.21 2.58 6.3B 2.51 E,. G 1 6.25 5. A6 6. E, 0 1.59 60. 05

1960 1.85 3.64 11.02 0.62 1.99 5.33 8.42 4. o5 11.42 6. 05 F, 5 1.04 58.08

11- 9.20 1.42 4. 00 2. 69 5.19 10.56 5.42 3. ziB 5.57 4.79 0. 67 57.3(-.)

1962 2.46 0. 74 3.18 1.61 1.81 5.57 1 (.-). 11 7.75 12. 00 1.35 1. 9a 2.17 50.67

63 2. 33 5.84 1.32 0. 98 3.79 9. 10 4.67 4.73 2 1. 80 2.41 2.91 3.43 63.31

5E-- 5.80 -2.84 5.14 7.60 4. 95 6. 06 8.51 13.53 3.10 9.51 3.9o '79. 50-

1965 0. 82 6.51 3.17 1.72 1. 19 8.45 6.,36 3. E,.(-, 4.L3 2. 79 1. 2;5 2. 99 44.04

o. 6*2 1.18 54. 52
1136F, 4.28 lo. 67 0.85 1.22 9.16 1 8.57 4.27 4.87 I.S2

-'1967 3. 18 6.37 0.41 0. 06 1.59 4.42 6.74 4.10 8.48 3.99 0. 03 4.91 44.29

1968 0. 1E, 1. 66 1. 96 0. 31 4.45 7.96 3.86 10.93 1.99 7. 56 1.9s 1.39 44.21

19G9 1.62 1-:3. F, 6 G. 40 0. 36 22 3.15 2.65 8. u5 15. 97 8.85 3.33 3.60 62. 4&

7,------1970 --6. 38 8-.38- 7.19 2.24 2.38 5. 09 5.98 7.38 4.30 3.55 0. IF, 2.07 55.10

1971 1.80 4.37 5.18 2.69 1.86 8.47 5.93 4.85 4.26 6.72 3.14 5.91 55.06

1972 3.68 5.88 3.59 5.27 6.54 8.58 6.87 10.33 5.43 2.20 10.44 4.60 '7 3. 61;

17-4:*. 21- 4.77 2.67 6.64 3.88 5.35 8.88 5.31 0. 59 0.56 4.21 51. 24
1-374 0.73 2.0-2 -2.47 1. '21 -2. 0 1 13.52 5.58 6.8-2 3.91 .1.24 0. 5.@, I. F,3 41. 65

19-75 L. 23 4. 36 2.54 1.67 2.55 8.60 4.57 5.49 6. 50 6. 61 1. 30 2.15 46.57

1976 1.24 1.00 1.61 2.44 7.80 4.36 2.02 9.59 2.93 1.17 2.68 7.70 44.54

1977 3. 06 2. 67 0.76 1.97 3. 06 1.83 4.20 4. 27 4.51 0. 54 3. 68 7. 50 38. 05

1978 22 4.22 3.38 2.58 2.56 3. 03 8.10 3.55 6.81 3.07 0.32 5. 06 4 5. 13o

1979 P. 80 3. Zi 7 2.77 3.42 8.35 3.98 5.31 1. 10 1 S. 33 3. BO 2. c-')2 7.28 66. 63

1,380 5.2'9 1.27 5.91 3. 39 2'. 87 3.23 3.43 1.24 1. 81 3.13 2. 77 0.63 34.97

19BI 0. 71 5.60 3.71 0.60 0. 137 2.29 4.21 10.36 4. 80 2.92 4.76 2.57 43.52

1.73 -0.98 59.77-
982 617- 1. 66-- 5.02 6.63 3.20 12.63 5.4& 6.04- 6.20 G. 61

TABLE 7: MONTHLY AND ANNUAL [RAINFALL IN INC-HEE3 FOR ST JOHNS COUNI ,Y HEAR SST A U G U S T I NE

TD-TAL YEARLY
YE A R JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S E P OCT NOV DEC RA I NFALL

--'. 62 4. E.3 S. 12 6. 14 1 . 9 7 4. 93' 3. 25 4. 9 5 1. 6 E,. 6 8 3. 5 1 6. '22 6 1. 58

-384 - i. 7i:@ 0. 74 43.72
2. 29 5. 4. 14 2.87 .30, 4.30 4.6,3 2.51 1, . 17 2.

PASE I

TABLE 8: BASIN ACREAGES

BASIN
NAME AREA ACRES E@q mile

MOL MAIN E 856632(). ouO 196. 7,,-)2 (D. 307

MOL MAIN N 2.799413E+08 6, 427. 00C.) 10. 041

MOL MA 1 N S 1. 4(.')8V32E+o8 3, 232. 765 5.o5,.

MOL TkIB 1 50 138880. 000 1, 151. 030 1.798

MOL TRIB 2 23792028. 000 546.190 0.853

MOL TRID 3 29981644. 000 688.284 1. 075

MOL TRIB 4 i.oo7924E+oS 2, 313. 874 3. G 15

MOL---T R I B 5 26069252. 000 598.468 0. '335

MOL TRID A 2128C)o3r- 000 488.522 0. *763

MOL TRIB B 67167872. 000 1,542.421 2. A 10

MOSS MAIN E 17702460. 000 406.393 o.635

MOS MAIN S 11872592.000 272.557 0. 42E,

MOS MAIN Vi 1.024977E+oS 2,353.o23 3. 676

7- MOS TRIP, 1 13713980. 000 314.830 0.492

MOS TRIB 2 15483954.000 355.463 0.555

ry'l 0 SI-RID 3 19315144. OCdO 443.415 0. 693

MOS TRIB 4--12986412.oOO
298.127 0.466

MOS TRIB 5 3971621-:12. CYOC) 91 1. 759 1.425

MOS TRIB 6 1. 190605E+08 2', 733. 252 4. @--,70

M 0 S TRIB A 14837344.000 340. 619 0. 532

P Pi 0 E

TABLE "D: A-CREAGE OF: DRAINAGE BASING

BASIN NAME OF SrQ.UARE MILES
NUMBE BASIN ACREAGE OF BAEiIN Of-- BA3IN

MUL Tj RI 8 5 59 8. Li E. 8 93,5

3 MOL 1 DG. 702
MAIN E (D. 7

MOL TRID 2 546. 190 u. 85,-@

5 MOL MAIN S 3, 23 2 . 7 6 5 5. 051

6 MOS TRIB 2 355.463 o.555

7 MOS TRIB 3 442.415 O.G93

6 MOS TRID 6 P, 733. 252 4. 2'7 0

9 MOS MAIN W 2, 353. 023 3.676

i 0 MOS TRID A 346.619 0. @52P

11 MOS 'f RI B 4 298. IE7 u. 4 IS

12 MOS MAIN E 406.393 f.@35

13 MOS TRI'D 5 T[ii.-59 11.425

14 MOS MAIN S 272.557 0. 426

MOS TRIB 1 314. 830 0.492

19 MOL TRIS 4 2, 313. 874 3.615

LCY MOL T RIB 1 151. (),3,0 i-798

2-i- MO!-- .@R-P 3- 688.22,4 1. 075

22 MOL TRIB A 486.522 0. 7 F, 3

23 MOL MAIN N 6, 4-27. 000 10. 04i

24 MOL TR I B B 1,542.421 2. 410

'PAGE

TABLE MOLjLTrlE CREEK AND MOSCS [,F.EEK FL00DWAY DATA

DISTANCE WIDTH AT CROS'-,*- CROSS-SECTIONAL MEAN VELOCITY
CREEK & 7RIBUYARY CROSS-SECY10N UPSTREAM Ift) SEC I- I ON (ft) AREA .1sq Ft) (fps)

MOSES CREEK A 7. (10c El 16- 1, 171
B 1,2, 4 4 6, 2, '367 7
C 16, 450 468 3,814 f,
D 24, 690 226 1,928 o
E. 26, 090 294 1,833
F 27, 630 461 2,762 o.7
6 2;R, 1,296 1
H 32,98C) 73 48F, 3.2
1 34,800 374 iR, 054 0. 8
1 36,750 64 344 4. G
K 38,209 313 1,713 0. 5
L 42, 149 483 1, 460 "-.). C,
M 42, 41-:11 721 430 2. 0

=.--MOSES--C REEK NO I A 700 55 163 1.9
P. 1.230 22 93 3.3
C 53 134 2.3
D 5,640 17 85 3.6-

MOSES CREEK NO 2 A 32(-.) 2o F, 0 2.4
B 1,998 148 931 0. 2
C 3,698 127 561 o.2
D 6,149 4

MOS-ES CREEK NO 3 A 6oo -"q 82 .2
B 111:) E. 3 i 5.6

MOSES CREEK NO 4 A 330 64 421 1.3
B 930 4 '9 233 2.3
C 3.500 F, 7 268 1.3--

A Floo 52 a5c) - G
MOSES CREEK NO 5
B 4,o4O 2oO 197 0.9

MOSES CREEK NO 6 A 5oo 104 337 2.5
B 800 2- 3 179 4.7
C 6F,3 167 484 1.7

MOULTRIE CREEK A 4, 800 171 1,36o 3.2
Eq 7, 9(.)C) 3139 E,353 1.9
C 8,380 148 1,107 4. 0
D 14,617 172 1,398 3 .
E 15, 990 066 8, 0136
-.).5
F 20, - -76C) 457 3, 087 1.4
G '24, 9GO 411 :,,, 610
H --- o' 15 C) 3 ItJ 9 2, 1 9 --;
I 35,55o 4 1 1, 700 i.6
1 35, 805 365 2,242 1.2
K 39,lo5 EE2 1,503 1.8
L 42,615 240 1,693 1.4
M 45,433 1, 131 4,774 0. 5

_= = = m -m m m m m m m m m m m = = = m

PAGE 2

TABLE lo: MOULTRIE CREEK AND MOSES CREEK FLCDDWAY DATA

DISTANCE WIDTH AT CROSS- CROSS-SECTIONAL MEAN VELOCITY
CREEK & TRIBUTARY # CROSS-SECTION UPSTREAM (ft) SECTION (ft) AREA (sq ft) (fps)

MOULTRIE CREEK NO I A 1,050 2L. 142 3.7
B 4, 750 913 337 1. t)
5, 710 134 392 0. 9
D 6,757 48 IG3 2.3
7,129 59 189 2. 0
F -3, 123 4 1 126 3. cl
G 10, 129 6 35 4.9

7-MOULTRIE CREEK NO 3 A 1,800 74 21 6 a 1.61
B 5,8(.)0 90 313 1.4

_'_MOULTRIE CREEK NO 4 A 1,00o 86 265 2. 5
B 2,400 114 449 5
C 2,670 2E 137 @.9
D 6,005 96 447 1.5
E 7,195 87 453 1.5
F 9, 305 112 409 1. 2
0 11,245 ill 48F, -1.
H 14, 2'95 22F, 672 (:). 7
1 16,023 17 1119 3.0

7@4

TABLE 11. RIGHT OF WAY CROSS CULVERTS

CULVERT DISTANCE DIAMETER LENGTH INVERT
NUMBER ROAD (FEET) LOCAT I ON QUANTITY (INCHES) TYPE (FEET) ELEV. (ft) COMMENTS

1 SR Elti 1, 70 W 01 F HOLMES 1 24 CMP PL Li c-'S E D
2 15, @ W OF HO;- N, E S .@'4 M-
i-, OPENI
2, 40t.@ E Ocr DEERWOOD UBC 3s@c) -'A . & OPE*-,' 41 x8l
4 1. E OF I - 173 5 3s 0 0 1: E- N,

5 CHERRY TREE RD 2, 2;95 W OF KINGS RL) 15 CMP, 0 0
6 3 7 0 W OF KINGS RD 2, 18 Ctlip 0 0.0
7 4, 42C.) W OF KINGS RD 1 15 Crip 0 C). 0

8 OAK RIDGE RD 1,550 W OF KINGS RD 1 18 CMP 0 0.

9 FRANCES RD 620 E OF MAC RD I SO CMP E-00 J-1 2. 9 OPEN

10 K T NGS RD 650 W OF JfCORNER) I Lo Ctlip 40(.) 15. 2, OPEN,

1.1 KINGS ESTATE RD 500 E OF GORDA BELLA 1 CIO CMP 400 20. E, OVIEN
I lp TRIE RD CMP 0 PiEN
1 760 W OF OLD MOUL I i6 C)
-13
0 W EDGE OF DOBBS RD i is CMP 0 0. 0 OPEN
14 0 W EDGE OF KINGS RD 2 ia CMP 0. Q OPEN

15 FEC RR 6, 072 S OF KINGS ESTATE RD 3 72 CMP 840 6. 0 OPEN
i6 2,375 S OF KINGS ESTATE RD 2 30 CMP 570 Q.O 10% OPEN
,7 1, 800 W OF H 0 L M, E S 3 L4 CMP 4C)O 0. 0 0 @P E N
P, 450 E OF DEERWOOD ACRESS 1 C B C Z:)
119 975 W OF HOLMES 2 4L ru Ill p 40c)

20 OLD MOULTRIE RD 0 CALLE DE LEON 1 24 CP 0 0.0 50% OPEN
21 0 LEWIS PT RD 1 30 CP 0 0. 0 OPEN
22 1, 250 N OF LEWIS PT RD 1 30 CP o 0.0 OPEN
2,100 N OF LEWIS PT RD 2 30--- CP- 0 0. 0 0 PE N
24 7,300 N OF LEWIS PT RD 1 30 CP 0. 0 OPEN
25 8,40C) N OF LEWIS PT RD 1 36 CP 0 0. 0 OPEN

26 C Y PRIE S S R D 600 W OF DOBBS FRD 1 15 CMP C) C). 0 OPEN
L7 @l ST AUGUSTINE BLVD I L4 CMP 0 4). 0 OPEN
28 .@T AUGUIST:NE BLVD 1 3 cillp, 0 0. Q OPEN

L9 LEWIS PT RD 875 W OF US 1 1 72 C.MP 330 19.0 OPEN

30 FP & L 430 W OF DOBBS RD 1 18 CMP 0.0 OPEN
31 1, 550 W OF DOBBS RD 1 18 CMPI 0 C). () 50% OPEN
32 520 W OF IND. PARK RD 1 24 CMP 0.0 50% OPEN
-150 w OF iNi:). F-AFI-i'l F-Ax) 50 Citip, 3 0 2 7. @-,, E, 0 @- u,@-t E N

34 D:IBBS Rr. 500 N OF KINGS ESTATE 15 CMP t) C. C BLOCKED

35 SR 207 1, SOO E OF LIGHTSEY RD a CBC 460 29. 2 OPEN 41 x8l
36 300 E OF HILLTOP RD 1 36 CP 0. 0 OPEN
37 1,5 *00 W OF HILLTOP RD 4 C BC 4("JO 14. 0 OPEN 8'x'O'
38-- 50V E OF 1 '35 2 18 CP 480 0. Q OPEN; FLOWI@G N

39 US 1 3, 700 S OF LEWIS PT RD 1 CBC 125 G. 6 OPEN ** 51 Y10%

3/ 14/89 -PGE

A B L E I I : R, I G H 0 F W,--! Y C R,L j I-, S C U L V E R T S

CULVERT DISTANCE DIAMETER LENGTH INVERT
NUMBER ROAD (FEET) LOCAT I ON G!UANT I I Y (INCHES) TYPE (FEET) ELEV. (ft) COMMENTS

ZVO HILLTOP RD 650 S OF SR L-.07 i 55 C Ml P 40 0. 0 OPEN

41 _fRQY MARA KENNELS RD 300 W OF us 1 1 so cmP 0 9. (71 OPEN

42 DEER RUN RD 350 W OF HOLMES EXT 1 18 CMP 0 C). 0 BLOCKED

43 HOLMES BLVD 500 N OF SCHOOL 1 30 Ctf,,P 0 0. 0 75% OV,EN

44 NORTHWOOD RD 1, 300 W OF HOLMES 3 24 CMP 0 0. 0 OPEN

45 LIGHTSEY RD 5,550 W OF SR 207 2 6f.) I G 20.2 OPEN

46 WILDWOOD RD 300 N OF CHEYENNE 55 CP 62 u. u OPEN

-47 OSCEOLA TRAIL 250 E OF WlLDWOOD 5 72 CMF, 40 -1.5 OPEN -2.5(E;

48 0. 0

::7
49 WINTERHAWK 200 E OF ARROWHEAD 1 36 CMP 0 0. 0 50% OPEN

50 SOUTH WINTERHAWK- 300 E OF ARROWHEAD 2 24 OMP o 0. 0 5o% OPEN
51 200 W OF OSPREY CIRCLE 2 24 CmP 0 0. 0 OPEN

52 WTNTERHAWK 200 E OF ARROWHEAD 1 is III M P 0 C. 0 OPEN

5 3 DEERWOOD ACRES RD 400 6 OF SR 214 1 3G CMP
0 OPEN

54 UNNAMED RD 200 W OF DEERWOOD 1 30 CMP BLOCKED

WI-LDWOOD-"RD--- 1,600 W OF FEC RR 1 60 CMP 63 0. 0 OPEN
56 3,19o W OF FEC RR I CP 45 0. C) OPEN
57 2;70 S OF PRAIRIE CREEK 1 55 CP 70 C.). C.) OPEN
_58--- 1,21o E OF FEC RR 1 48 CMP 62 o.0 75% OPEN

59 VAILL POINT' RD 1,980 E OF US 1 2 CMP El 0. 0 OPEN ** 6E!146

60 SHORES BLVD 2,98o E OF US 1 1 48 CMP 1 g(:) o. 0 OPEN

El SHORES BLVD N 1,135 E OF SEVILLA 1 A2 CMP BE, 0. 0 OPEN
G2 I @,-) 0 W OF SEVILLA 1 72 CMP i9i 14.2 OPEN

El 0 US 1 5, 7i'DO S OF SHORES BLVD S 0 G c@ 1.2.8 OP@N B,-'--
64 2,300 S OF SF'Oi@E3 f-'LVD N I CDC
U 41 )-Z",
5 900 S O@- SHOPES E,'_VD S 1, CBC 0 OPE N Z.1 @C@ I

66 SR 206 6 2 o W OF US i 2 C B C 75 16. 5 OPLN 41 @-LO I
C, 7 0 E OF FEC RR 1 30 1@p F, 0 C% 0 OIDEN
68 G50 E OF FEC RR 2 24 CP SO- C.). 0 OPEN

E9 FEC RR A,350 N OF _SR 2:06 C) BRG 0 17.2 OPEN BF, I 12E

7 C') CROOKED TREE TRAIL 870 W OF US 1 2 48 CP 81 0.0 OPEN

mmm

3/). '1 PAGE

T ABLE 11 : 13 1 GHT OF WAY C ROSS CULVERTS

CULVERT DISTANCE DIAMETER LENGTH INVERT
NUMBER ROAD (FEET) LOCATION QUANTITY -INCHES) TYPE (FEET) ELEV.(-,t) COMMENTS

71 CROOKED TREE TRAIL 870 W OF US 1 1 _-I- F, C ,, al 0. 0 OPEN

712 ROEHERS RD 50o E OF US 1 2 ** CMP 45 0. 0 OPEN 72"x42"

73 DATIL PEPPER RD 275 W OF US 1 1 36 CMP 25 3 C). C.) OPEN

74 CORPUS CHRISTI CHURCH 275 W OF US 1 1 36 CMF-, E, 4 u. 0 OPEN

75 SR 206 B, 190 E OF US I L CDC 70 16. 0 OPEN zi I x8l

76 SEVILLA 662 W OF SARTO CT 1 CMP i89 o. 0 OPEN 57"x3G"

77 GOLF COURSE 0 S OF SEVILLA 1 60 CMP 200 0. Q OPEN

78 DATIL PEPPER RD 1,207 N OF L 1 36 CMP- 25 o.0 25% OPEN

79 COLONIAL DR 745 E OF CYPRESS P7 RD I a4 CP 44 0. 0 OPEN
so- 270' E OF CYPRESS LANE 3 --MP 64 0 OPEN ** 25" >(40"

81 AUX POWER LINE RD 45L W OF MAIN POWER LINE 1 21 6 ClylP 18 c.). 0 5(:),,. OPEN
82 452 W OF MAIN POWER LINE 1 30 CMP 18 0. 0 5(-)% OPEN
83 995 E OF MAIN POWER LINE E 24 C M P 31 0 75% OPEN

84 PEC RR 1, 122 N OF WAT@;ON RD 2 36 CMP 45 C)
85 2, 97(.3 S- OF WATSON RD 2 30 Crip, 42 C. C)
86 594 S OF WATSON RD 2 30 CIMP 39 o.o
87------ 6,930 S OF WATSON RD 2 30 CMP 51 0.0
as 132 N OF SR 2oG 2 30 Clylp 54 0.0

89 -DELTONA BLVD 205 E OF LILY 1 48 100-- 0. C) SUBMERSED
90 286 W OF RITA CIR W 1 90 0 OPEN -,31'x24"
13 1 216 E OF RITA CIR E 1 90 0. 0 OPEN @fllclx:'41.

'32 WATcSON:RD o DA@ . IL PEPPER RD 1 24 4o 0.0 OPEN

9Z DATIL PEPPER RD 0 WATSON RD 1 18 30 0. 0 OPEN

94 3IOGGIN RD #23 0 MOSES BRANCH 6 C) BRG 22 o.o 31x'131 BRIDGE

95 LOGGIN RD #27 0 MOSES BRANCH 6 0 BRG 25 0. 0 6.51x20.51 BRIDGE

96 TRAIL 0 MOSES BRANCH 5 1 24 0 C.). 0
97 M 0 S- E S MAIN BRAP4CH C) 0 FORD
cis MOSES Bi@6)NCHI 4 C.) 0 FORD
99 MOSES BRANCH I C) 0 0 FORD

I DRIVEWAY o W OF US I N OF MOSES 1 C Ml 41 0. f) O@EN 60"x'32"

101 RIVIERA BLVD 0 N OF ROEHRS 1 32 CMP 41 0. 0 OPEN

-102--SHORES- BLVD-- 0 S OF B I ANCA--- 1-18- ----CMP--O- 0*. 0 OPEN

TABLE il: RIGHT OF WAY CROSS CULVERTS

CULVERT D I Sl -4NCE DIAMETER LENGTH INVERT
NUMBER ROAD (FEE-, ) LOCATION (INCHES) TYPE (FEET) ELEV.(ft) COMMEN' 1-3

103 CHR 1 ST 1. NA 0 -D'W END O@-- L-J'REE-1 1 18 C;ep, 0. 0

104 OLD LOGGING RD W OF WI,_DW0OD PINES 1 .3 S CM',Z, 0.(-) OPE N

1
'05 _@E,
1 95 26. 850 N OF SR 2C 1. 30 CmP 166 3E.5 13 Fl. 3 ( E
106 _5 2 @(7
@ C20 N OF SR 20E, Cmrl' I C-1 a ZS. 5 Z6. 3 (E)
107 21,62C.) N OF SR 20 -6 2 42 c:MP I C-18 Z@ 4. 3 31q . I (E)
108 N OF 3 R '20 G 2 c 8 C 234 219. 13 12, x1a,
101 9 620 N OF SR 206 ;j! CBC 162 3.4. 0 81 X31
110 14,370 N OF SR 2 0 G 2 .2 4 CMP 18Q 3 6. i -1 5. 7 E
12, N OF S R L(.-)E. L 30 CMP 168 3L. 5 E)
li2 7,52@) N OF SR " 0 G 1 24 CrIp 166 37. 0 3 S. 8 E
i13 6, 370 N OF SR 20G 2 L4 CMP 1 E-2
114 4, 720 N OF SR 206 2 24 ClIP 168 7. 0 3c.S(E)
115 3,145 N OF SR 206 2 30 CM p 178 36.5 36. -;'(E)
116 100 N OF SR 214 2 CBC o 1). 0 125@4@

i17 US I 4E2 IN 0;:' WILDWOOD I CBC 47 0. 0 21 X2,
iia 2, 376 N OF WATSON', RD I CBC 102 0. ('-) 41X81

119 SR 206 1 GO E OF US 1 1 1.8 Cv, 70 'J. C)
iLo 375 E OF US 1 1 24 __p 74
4 7,_1 - OF 1 `3 5 1 1 a CP 64
7, 800, E OF 95
I L-2.3 5, 580 E OF 1 9 5 1 is C P 64 0

124 CORPUS CHRISTI CHURCH 300 S OF DATIL PEPPEEER RD 1 36 CMP 36 C) OPEN

125 US I Q MOULTRIE CREEK I El, R G -2. 2 BRIDGE

126 FEC RR MOULTRIE CREL:'.'K I B RG 0 -6.0 BRIDGE
_427 7, 900 NE OF 1 95 1 BRG 0 _:Zi.0 BRID-E

-3/14/89 PAGE

TABLE 12: DETAILED SOIL MAP UNITS
-7
SOIL
NUMBER SOIL NAME

IADAMSVILLE FINE SAND

PASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE

3MYAKKA FINE SAND

4MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

5ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

GTAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE

7IMMOKALEE FINE SAND

B-ZOLFO FINE SAND

9 POMONA FINE SAND

!I SMYRNA FINE SAND

12 ONA FINE SAND

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND

14 CASSIA FINE SAND

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE

18 FLORIDANA FINE SANE) FREQUENTLY FLOO7)V_,L:'

POMPANO FINE SAND -- ----------

21 WABASSO FINE SAND

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED

23-PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED

2:5 'PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM @REQUENILY FLOODED

26 SAMSULA r,,UCK

E-1 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND

28 BEACHES

29-SATEL-LITE FINE SAND--

.3 14 / SS PAGE

.ADLE 12- DETAILED SGIL MAP UNITS,

SOIL
NUMBER SOIL NAME

".0 WESCONNETT FINE SAIND FRECDUE@,_'LY F-OC.DEL"

3. FRIP-SA-t_ELLI"E COMPLEX

@2 PALM DEACH SAND 0-5% SILOPIE

JONATHAN FINE SAND

34 TOCOI FINE SAND

35 HONTOON MUCK

6 RIVIE'RA FINE SAND PREDUENTLY FLOODED

38 t_-'l TS

4 0 zOT-fSE;L;F-,,G FrINE _SAND

4i TOMOKA MUCK

4 2, BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED

44 SPARR FINE SNND c.)-5% SLOPE

z,.5 ST AuE.'USTINE FINE SANII, C.LAYEY SUBSTRATUM

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

4 A WIINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRAl-UM.,

51 ST AUGUS71NIE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

52 DURRIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED

5_211 @'MtrOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

i__Afr.JC OMPLEX

5 -7 ADANSVILLE VARNIAINI.- FINE SAND

58 EAUSALLI E FINE SAND

G,, RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

P A 0 E 3

TAB-E 12': DETAILED SOIL MAP jNITS

SOIL
NUMBER SOIL NAME

62 FLORIDANA FIN,E SAND

63 PLACID FINE SAND

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND

S5 RIVIERA FINE SAND

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FPEQUENTLY FLOODED

6B WINDER FINE SAND

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK

PAGE

TABLE 13: SOIL SERIES AND RELATED SOIL UNITS

SOIL
SOIL SERIES NO. SOIL NAME

38 PITS
55 ARENTS

ADAMSVILLE IADAMSVILLF =INE SAN ID
57 ADANSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND

ASIATULA 2ASTATULA FINE SAND (:)--6% SLOPE
54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

7 BAKERSVILLE 69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK

BEACHES 28 BEACHES

BLUFF 42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED

CASSIA 14 CASSIA FINE SAND

-DURB I N 52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED

EAUGALLIE 58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND

ELLZEY 64 ELLZEY FINE SAND

FLORIDANA 18 FLORIDANA FINE -SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
b-2 FLORIDANA FINE SAND

FRIPP----- 31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX

HOLOPAW 46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND
47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

HONTOON ---5 HONTOON MUCK

IMMOKALEE 7IMMOKALEE FINE SAND
53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

JONATHAN 33 JONATHAN FINE SAND

MANATEE 22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED

MOULTRIE 49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

lfiYAKKA 3MYAKKA FINE SAND

MYAKKA DEPRESS 4MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

NARCOOE-SEE 50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM

DNA 12 DNA FINE SAND

ORSINO 16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE

3/14/89 PAGE 2

TABLE I,_n,: SOIL SERIES AND RELATED SOIL UNITS

SOIL
SOIL SERIES NO. SOIL NAME

PALM BEACH 32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE

PAOLA 23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE

PARKWOOD 25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM.FRE-OUENTLY FLOODED

PELLICER 24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED

63 PLACID FINE SAND

POMELLO 15 POMELL0 FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE

7 POMONA 9POMONA FINE SAND

lPOMPANO------ 19 POMPANO FINE SAND

_7 POTTSBURG 40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND

RIVIERA RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
65 RIVIERA FINE SAND

RIVIERA DEPRESS 61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

SAMSULA 26 SAMSULA MUCK

SATELLITE 29 SATELLITE FINE SAND
31- FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX

SMYRNA 11 SMYRNA FINE SAND

SPARR 44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE

----l.ST AUGUSTINE- 27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND
45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM
51 ST AUGUST I NE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

ST JOHNS 13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND

ST JOHNS DEPRESS 5ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

TAVARES 6TAVARES FINE SAND o-5% SLOPE

7ERIRA CEIA 66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED

TISONIA (f, 7TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED

Tocol F
34 70COI FINE SAND

TOMOKA 41 TOMOKA MUCK

WABASSO 21 WABASSO FINE SAND

mm mmm m m m
3@14/89 PAGE

TABLE 13: SOIL SERIES AND RELATED SOIL UNITS

SOIL
3@ SOIL SERIES NO. SOIL NAME

WESCONNETT 30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

WINDER 48 WINDPR FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
68 WINDER FINE SAND

70LFO 8ZOLFO FINE SAND

2 1

':2 3!

271

s2:

;34

713@

P A 1,3 E 1

7 A E: L E 14 0 L L 1.-,: 1 A T 10 F 0 R SEEP 1, IC I A N 3

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION 91-ND OF LIMITATIONS

1 ADAMSVri-LE FINE SAND SEjEriE -POOR FILTER

2 ASTATULLA F1,NE SAND (:)-B% &L-OPE SL 1 GHT

3 MYAKKA FINE SA'.ND SEVERE WETNE-3S

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEf-'R'ESSIONAL S E V i E p E POND 1 NG

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

E. TAVARES FINE SAND 0--5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS POOR FILTER

9 PGM0lNq FINE SAND S El-'@ - EIR-E WETNI I. ss PERICS -.31LOWLY

II SMYRNA FlNE SAND SEVERE WED NESS POC,R FILTLR

12 ONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS POOR FILTER

13 ST jOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE W E T IN, E S S

14 CASSIA FINE SAND SEVERE W E -7 KIE S

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE WETNESS POOR FILTER

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WET NE SE, FLOODING PERCS SLOWLY

----ig--POMPAND FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS POOR FILTER

I WADASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS PERCS SLOWLY

22 'FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTL-Y ;@LOQDED SEVERE W E T N E SS FLOODING

-.--23- PAOLA FINE SAND 0-6% SLOPE SLIGHT

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED S'E V E RE WETNESS FLOODING PERCS SLOWLY

PARKWDDI, - 7
F.NE SANDY LD@iM FRE(,,.-UEjq7LY FLO-CDED SEVERE WE.-INESS FLOCE)ING PERCE SLOWLY

26 SF;r!SULA MUL-l'K SEVERE PnNDING POOR FILTER

L.7 S7 AUGUSTINE IFINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS POOR -FILTER

28 BEACHES

-29-SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS- POOR- FILTER

PAGE 2

H
-LE 14: SDI; LIMITATIONS FOR 2E;-.,Tl:2 7-NKS

SOIL
DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODEE SEVERE WETNESS 17LOOD I NG POOR FILTER

:51 FR!P-SATELLITE COMPLEX S'L I G H T

SEVERE W E T N E'_- S POOR FILTER

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND SEVERE WEINESS POOR FILTER
PERCS SLOWLY

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

35 HONTOON MUCK SEVERE PONDING POOR FILTER

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING PERCS SLOWLY

@33 PTITS

SEVERE WE-l"NESS
40 :TSBURG FINE SAND

41 TOMOKA MUCK SEVERE PONDING POOR FILTER

42 BLUFF SANDY CLPY ILDAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOOD'NG*- PER(:'S, SLOWLY

44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE WETNESS

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE WETNESS

46--HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS POOR FILTER--"-

47 HOLOPAW-.1-IINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

-7
48 WINDER-FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING PERCS SLOWLY

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING POOR FILTER

WETNESS -ER
50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRA7UM SEVERE POOR FILI

--TNE"-)S
51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE WL POOR FILTER

5 22 DURBIN MUC@-f, FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE W E 7 N ES, S FLOODING POOR 7T LTER

LAND E-10111F.LEX SEVERE WLTNESS

54 A'-l-lAl!_U_A-URBAN @_AND COMPLEX 3:_ 10 1-.* T

7_---- 55 nRRENTS-0-2% SLOPE

i@4 57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS POOR FILTER

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

14: SOIL IMITATIONS FOR SEPTIC

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

I RIVIERA FINE E@AND D-E-P.-RESSIONAL S E YE F ,-.,E.--RCS @_,LUWLY

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND SEVER.E W E T NE S PERCS SLOWLY

F, 3 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE W E 7 N E SS POOR FILTER

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

F, 5 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE W E 1- NE PERCS SLOWLY

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED E V EIR E W E T NES S FLOODING POOR FILTER

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUEJQTLY FLOODED SEVERE W E TIN E S S L 0 C) D IN G PERCS SLOWLY

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS PERCS SLOWLY

E9_BAKERSVILLE MUCK --SEVERE POND I NO

P A G E I

TABLE 15: SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE

7 DEPTH TO KIND OF MONTHS WATER
SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME WATER (FT) WATER TABLE I-ABLE IS HIGH

I ADAMSVILLE FiNE SAND 2. 0 3.5 APPARENT JUN NOV

2 A31"ATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE %

3 MYAK'KA Fl-.NE SAND 0. 0 1 . t:) APPARENT J UN NOV

4 KYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL +2.0 1. 0 APPARENT JUN FEB

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL +2.() 1. 0 APPARENT JUN APR

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 3.5 G . APPARENT JUN DEC

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND 0. 0 1. 0 APPARENT JUN NOV

8 ZOLFO-FINE SAND 2.0 3.5 APPARENT JUN NOV

9 POMONA FINE SAND 0.0 41. 0 APPARENT JUL SEP

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND U.0 1. APPARENT JUL OCT

12- DNA FINE SAND 0. v 1. APPARENT JUN NOV

13 ST JOHNS FINE SANID 0. 1. 0 APPARENT JUN APR

14 CASSIA FINE SAND 1.5 3.5 APPARENT JUL Jj AN

15- POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 2.0 3.5 APPARENT JUL NOV

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 3.5 5.0 APPARENT JUN DEC

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOOU= o.o 1.0 APPARENT JUN FEB

19 POMPANO-FINE SAND 0.0 1.0 APPARENT JUN NOV

21 WABASSO FINE SAND 0.0 1. C) APPA REN T JUN OCT

2L MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED cl. 0 1. cl APPARENT JUN FEB

23-PA-OLA FINE- SAND Q-8% SLOPE 6.0 %

APPARENT J AN DEC
-4 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0. 0 0. 5

5 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0.0 I.o APPARENT JUN OCT

E. SAMSULA MUCK +2. C) 1. 0 APPARENT JAN DEC

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND 1.5 3.0 APPARENT JUL OCT

2,8 BEACHES

29-SATEL-CITE- FINE SAND- 1. 0 3. 5 APPARENT- JUN NO

14/ 89 P A GE 2

iBLE 15: S- P-ONAL H 1 GH WATER Tf:)B' E

SOIL DEPTH To KIND OF MONTHS WATER
NO. SOIL NAME WATER FT-l' W A T Z- R Tl P i BL E TABLE IS HIGH

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 1, C) APPARENT JUN FED

3@ FR.IP-SATEL,-I7E COMPLEX B. 0
J.. 0 -.b A PIP A R E N T UN INOV

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0--tS% SLOPE S. I) I/.

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND 0 5. 0 A PPAR@ NT JUN OCT

34 TOCCI FrNE SAND (-,).o ; -
A,"P,,@RENT AUG FEE

Z 5 HOINTOON MUCK 4-2. A P A FT.: N jAN DEC

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED Q.0 PPPARENT JUN DEC

38 Pl",CS

-0 POTTSBURS' FINE SAND Q.o I. Q HPPARENT JUL MAR

41 TOMOKA MUCK I . CD 0. 3 -1-1PARENT" JUN A P R

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENI-LY FLOODED C). c@ I . C) APPARENT JUL DEC

4L@ SPARR FINE 'SAND u-5% SLOPE 1 5 3@5 - E N 1" i UL 0 f-, li

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM i. 5 3. C) APPARENT JUL OCT

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND 0. 0 1.0 APPARENT JUN NOV

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0. 0 1.0 APPARENT JUN FEB

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED o.o 1.0 APPARENT JUN DEC'

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0. 0 1 . C) APPAREN-F JAN DEC

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM 2.0 3.5 APPARENT JUN NOV

51 ST AUGUST lNE--URx3AN LAND -OMPLEX 5 3.(- APPARENT JUL OCT

52 DURBIN MUCK FREOUENTLY FLOODED 0.5 APPARENT JAN DE C

57 lMMOKALE'-7-UFE,'AN LAND CDrIPLEX 1. APPARENT JUN NOV

i-iFENTS SLOPE

57, nDis,MSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND 2. 0 3.5 APPARENT JUN NOV

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND 0.0 1.0 APPARENT JUN OCT

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL +2. 0 1.0 APPARENT JUN DEC

1 / 14 / 89 PAGE

TABLE lb: SEASONAL HIGH WAT-ER Tf-ILLE

SOIL DEPTH 1-0 KIND OF MONTHS WATER,
NO. SUIL NAME WATEER (F-') WH-'fE'( TABLE I CA El L E IS HIGH

f@2 FLURIDANA FINE SAND o 1. 0 APF-,i@RENT JUN FEEq

L3 PLACID FINE SAND C) 1. t:) APPARENT ji U N, M A R

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND (,).o 1.0 APPARENT JUN OCT

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND C). C) 1. C) APPARENT JUN DEC

GE I'ERRA CEIA MUCK FREGI.UENT-Y FLOODED 0 1 f) APPARENT i A N DEC

E-7 TISIDNIA 'TlUCKY PEAT F-PEOL:iE.%-TLY FLOODED 0. 0 5 APPARENT JAN DEC

68 WINDER FINE SAND 0 APPARENT JUN DEC

E9 BAKERSVILLE MUCK 2. 0 1. 0 APPARENT JUL MAR

PAGE 1

TABLE 16: SOIL LIM7@TATIONS FOR EMBfANt@MENl_S

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO- SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

1 i-IDAMSVILLE FINE SAND S E VER E SEE':.'AGE P I F, T Nf

2 ASTATULA, FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SEVERE: C.,@:@PAGE PIPING

.3 MlYAK'KA FINE SAND 3E V E R E SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

". MVAK@'A FINE SAND UEPRESSIONAL IS E V E, RE SEEPAGE PIPING PONDING

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 'SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING PONDING

6 1AVARES FINE SAND 1-1-5% SLOPE SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE

9 POt,10NA FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

11 SNYPINA F-INEE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE P I P I N G WETNESS

12 ONA FINE SAND SEVERE S E F P A G E r-, I P I NO
I WETNESS

13 ST JOHNS FlNE 5AND SEVERE 3 E E' PA G E P I P I NO W E T N E SE,

14 CASSIA FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

18 FLDRIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS

19 POMPANO FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

2 1 WABASSO FINE SAND E', EV E RE SEEPAGE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WEI-NESS

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SEVERE SEEPAGE P I PI NO

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE HARD TO PACK EXCESS SALT WETNESS

L5 @:AR.@IWOCD F-@N@E b-ANIDY LOAI'l FREQUIENTLY T-Li'DODED SEVERE SFEIPAGE P I P I N G WETNESS

2 G SA1111SULA MUCK SEVERE EXCESS HUMUS PONDING

'_'7 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE P I P I NO EXCESS SALT

28 BEACHES

-WETNESS
L9 SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

16: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR EMBANKMEN"l-S

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. 601L NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

IFRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX SEVERE SEEPAGE P@PING
SEVERE SEEP AGE PIPING SATELLITE WETNESS

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE P I F--, I NG

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE SEE-PAGE PIPING WETNESS

35 HONTOON MUCK SEVERE EXCESS HUMUS PONDINO

3E RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

36 PITS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND- SEV[:RE SEEPAGE WETNESS

41 TOMOKA MUCK IS E V E R E PIPING POND ING

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS

44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE SEETPAGE

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

4G HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PI PI NG WETNESS

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SEEPAGE WETNESS

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQLiLNTLY FLOODED SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE SEEPAGE

51 ST AUGUS71NE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE EXCESS HUMUS EXCESS SALT WETNESS

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

54 ASTA7ULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

55 ARENTS 6-2% SLOPE

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

Sl RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING PONDING

m m m m m m - . m - m m m m m . - m - m m m m m m

PAGE 3

TABLE 16: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR EMBANKIMENTS

SOIL DEGREE OF
. NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

62 FLOR I DANA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNIE6S

63 PLACID FINE Si-)ND SEVERE SEEPAGE I P I NG WETNESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS

------67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE HARD TO PACK EXCESS SALT WETNESS

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

69 DAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE SEEPAGE PIPING POND I NG

PAGE I

TABLE 17: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR AQUIFER--FED EXCAVATED PONDS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAPIE LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

1ADAMSVI@LE F TNE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

_-_2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SEVERE NO WATER

3MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

A- MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

5-ST-JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

E TAVARES F71NE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

-ZOLFO--FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

9 POMONA FINE SAND SEVEPE CUTBANKS CAVE SLOW REFILL

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

-----12 ONA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

14 CASSIA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

15-POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

18 -FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SLOW REFILL

19 PIPMPANO FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

21 WABASSO FINE SAND SEVERE SLOW REFILL

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SEVERE NO WATER

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SLOW REFILL SALTY WATER

L5 PARKWOOD FINEE. SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED :3 EV E R E CUIBANKES CAVE

2 GSAMSEULA MUCK SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

,::f'7 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SALTY WATER

28 BEACHES

-29--SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE--

14/89 PAGE 2

TABLE 17: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR AQUlFER-FED EXCAVATED PONDS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

31 F*RlP-SATELLITE COMPLEX SEVERE NO WATER * FRIPP
SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE * SATELLITE

----32-PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE NO WATER

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SLOW REFILL

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

--------35 HONTOON MUCK SLIGH7 FAVORABLE

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

38 PITS

0'-POTTSBURG FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

41 TOMOKA MUCK SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SLOW REFILL.

44 SPARR FINE SAND (-.)-5% SLOPE E I'E V E RE CUTBANKS CAVE

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SALTY WATER

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

47-HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTE@- FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SLOW REFILL

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SALTY WATER

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SALTY WATER

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SALTY WATER

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

54 AS7ATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE NO WATER

55 ARENTS 0-2% SLOPE

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

3 /14/89 PAGE 3

TABLE 17: SGIL LIMITATIONS ;:1'R A(;!UlF'ER-FED EXCAVATED PONDS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO.SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF L. I M I'f AT I (INS

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND SEVER 'E CUTBAN'I'S C,"AVE SLOW REFILL

63 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE CUISPNKS CAVE

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

F, 5RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREOUENTLY FLOODED SLIGHT

'ONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQ.UENTLY FLOODED SEVERE SLOW REFILL SALTY WATER
G 7TIES

66 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE SLOW REFILL

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

PAGE I

TABLE 18: FEAIURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR DRAINAGE

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

I ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE DEEP TO WATER

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING CUTBANKS CAVE

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
PONDING CUTBANKS CAVE

6 TAVARES FINE SAND o-5% SLOPE DEEP TO WATER

7
7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

8-ZOLFO-FINE SAND- CUTBANKS CAVE

9 POMONA FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

12 ONA FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND WETNESS CUTBANKS CAVE

14 CASSIA FI,"I'E SAND CUTPANKS CAVE

15 POMELLO-FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE CUTBANKS CAVE

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0--5% SLOPE DEEP TO WATER

13 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED FLOODING PERC SLOW

19-POMPANO FINE-SAND- CUTBANKS CAVE

21 WABASSO FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE PERC St-OW

E2 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED FLOODING

.----23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE DEEP TO WATER

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUE14TLY FLOODED FLOODING PERC SLOW EXCESS SALT

25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED CUTBANKS CAVE FLOODING

2E. SAMSULA MUCK PONDING SUBSIDES

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE EXCESS SALT

28 BEACHLS

29- SATELLITE-FINE-SAND CUTBANKS-CAVE

AG-3 E 2

TABLE 18: FEATURES AFFECTING '50ILS USE FOR DRAINAGE

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

-60 WESCONNETT FINE SAND @7REQUENTLY FLOODED W ET N ES S(_-@Ul-UANKS CAVE FLOODING

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX * FRiPP DEEP 10 WnTER
* SA7 EL CUTBANKS' CAVE

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE DEEP TO WATER

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND DEEP, TO WATER

34 TOCOI FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

35 HONITOON MUCK POND I NG SUBSIDES

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FLOODING PERC SLOW

a PITS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

41 TOMOKA MUCK POND I NG E*l U F.3 S I D ES

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED FLOODING PERC SLOW

44 SPARR FINE SAND (-)-5% SLOPE CUTBANKS CAVE

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM CUTBANKS CAVE

46 HOLOPIAW FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED CUTBANKS CAVE FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED FLOODING PERC SLOW

49 MOULTREE FINE Spj@@D r_7 REQUENTLY FLOODED CUTBANKS CAVE F-Lor
,) 1) T rq G EXCESS SALT

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM CUTE.:ANKS CAVE

51 ST AUGUSTINE-UFTIAN LAND COMPLEX CUTBANKS CAVE

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED FLOODING SUBSIDES EXCESS SALT

53 IMM.K.3KALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX CUT BANKS CAVE

5 Z; -AND COMPLEX DEEP TO WA`ER

Fj 5ARLN'FS 0-2% SLOPE

57 ADANSVILLE VARIANT FINE 'SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

56 EAUGALLTE FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

I RJ'VIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIDNAL PONDING PERC SLOW

PAGE 3

TABLE 16- FEATURES AFFECTING S,13ILS USE FOR DRAINAGE

SOIL
NO. E30IL NAME

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND PERC SLOW

PLACID SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND CUTBANKS CAVE

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND PERC SLOW

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED FLOODING SUBSIDES

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FLOODING PERC SLOW

68 WINDER FINE SAND PERC SLOW

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK PONDING CUTBANKS CAVE SUBSIDES

3/14/89 PAGE 1

TABLE 19: FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR IkRIGATION

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

I ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND WE-NESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-6% SLOPE DROUGHTY FAST I NTAKE SOIL BLOWING

MYAKKA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

-5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE SOIL BLOWING

7 1MMOKALEE FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND - WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

9 POMONA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY F AS T INTAKE

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

12 DNA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST I NTAKE

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

14 CASSIA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE SOIL BLOWING

IS FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FASI' I NTAI-',E SOIL BLOWING

-19 POMPANO FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

21 WABASSO FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

E 2 MANAIEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS SOIL BLOWING

23 PAOLA FINE SAND (-)-S% SLOPE DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE SOIL BLOWING

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FLOODING EXCESS SALT

25 PPARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM -r-PE-QUENTLY FLOODED WETNE,D-S FLOODING S 0 1 L B L 0 IWI I IN G

2'6 SAMSULA MUCK PONDINO SCIL BLOWING

27 ST qUGUSTINE FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY EXCESS SALT

Z3 28 BEACHES

29- SATEL-EITE' FINE' SAND- WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE--

PAGE 2

rABLE 19: FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR IRRIGATION

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS F AST I NTAK_= SOIL BLOWING

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX SLOPE DROUGH-1-Y FAST INTAKE *FRIPP
3 .
WETNESS DR"OUGHTY FAS_.l_ 1 N-,i AKE **,- A';-EL

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE SOIL 81-OWING

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE SOIL PLOWING

34 TOCOI FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

25 HONTOON MUCK PONDING SOIL BLOWING

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

38 PITS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST I NTAKE

41 TOMOKA MUCK POND 1 f-Z

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW

44 SPARP FINE SAND (-.,-5% SLOPE WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST I NTAKE

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM WETNESS DROUGHTY

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOOIDED WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE
@,9 MOULTRIE: FINE SAND FREQUEN-fLY FLOODED WEiNESS FLOODING E XCESS SALT

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSIRATUM WETNESS DROUGHTY I-AST INTAKE

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX WETNESS DROUGHTY

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FLOODING EXCESS SALT

53 !MMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

54 ASIFATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE SOIL BLOWINIG

5 ',-j ARENTS S.LDLIE

ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

3/14/89 PAGE 3

TABLE 19: FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR IRRIGATION

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

62-' FLO R I DANA F INIE SAND WETNESS FASI INTAlr-l'E SOIL D'LOWING

63 PLACID FINE SAND WETNESS FAST INTAKE SOIL BLOWING

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND WETNESS FAST INTAKE

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

L6 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FLOODING SOIL BLOWING

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS FLOODING PERC SLOW

68 WINDER FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY FAST INTAKE

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK PONDING FAST INTAKE

I
BLE
A 20- FEATURES AFFEC71NG SOILS US;:' FOR TERRACES AND DIVERSIONS

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOlL BLOWING

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING 1-00 SANDY SOIL BLOWING

5--ST-JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING TDO SANDY

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE !'DO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

8--ZOLFO FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING------

9 POMONA FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

-----12 DNA FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY

14 CASSIA FlNE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING-

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW SOIL BLOWING

19 POMPANO FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING----

21 WABASSO FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY

LE MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS SOIL BLOWING

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE TOO SANDY SOIL SLOWING

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW

@,5 PARl_',WOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS SOIL BLOWING

2C SAMSULA MUCK' PONDING SOIL BLOWING

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL SLOWING

28 BEACHES

29- SATEI:1:1 TE F I NE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

PAGE 2

TABLE 20: FEATURES AFFECTING SOILS USE FOR TERRACES AND DIVERSIONS

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS TOD SANDY

-- 31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPL17X SLOPE TOO SANDY SOIL. BLOWING
WETNESS TDO SANDY SOIL PLOWING

--32 PALM BEACH SAND o-5% SLOPE TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

34 TOCOI FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

35 HONTOON MUCK PONDING SOIL BLOWING

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

38 PITS

-POT
-7 =BURG FINE-SAND-- WE7NESS 700 SANDY SOIL BLOWING

41 TOMOKA MUCK PONDING

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW

44 SPARR FINE SAND o.-5% SLOPE WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

@,5 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOW-LNG

47 HOLOPAW F INE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLO14ING

48 WINDER---IFINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW SOIL. BLOWING

49 MOULTRI-El FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS TOO SANDY

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX WETNESS TOD SANDY SOIL BLOWING

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED WEI-NESS

53 IMMDKALE-E-URBAN LAND COMPLEX WETNESS TOD SANDY SOIL BLOWING

54 @iSTATU-A-LRBAN LAND COMPLE-X 1-00 SANDY SOIL Bi-OW I NG

5 5 AREN-: S 0-2% SLOPE

57 ADAMSVIL.LE VARIANT FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

56 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

zm Gi RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PONDING TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

PAGE

TABLE 2(-.)- FEATURES AFFECTINC SOILS USE FOR TERRACES AND DIVERSIONS

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

Oj-*TDANq FINE SAND SL.-DW@ F'@DW-NG

G, 3 PLACID FINE SAND W E -ii N & SSE TOO DANDY SOIL B'LOIWIING

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND WETNESS TOO SANDY SOIL BLOWING

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND WETNESS 1-00 SANDY SOIL BLOWING

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS SOIL- BLOWING

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW

68 W114DER FINE SAND W ET N ES S PERC SLOW SOIL BLOWING

b-9 BAKERSVILLE MUCK PONDING TOO SANDY

,ABLE 2-1: FEAlURES AFFECTINGi SOIL,-@ 170P OR-IS-L-

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND DROUGHTY

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE DROU0,H'! Y

3 NYAKKA Fl.'NE SAND WLTNEE,,13 DROUGHTY

4 MYA12KA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL WETNESS DROUGr2TY

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL WETNESS DROUGHTY

6 TAVARES FINE SAND (:)-5*,' SLOPE DROUGHTY

T N;@ 'iUGHTY
7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND WE S DF@(-

8-ZOLFO FINE SAND DROUGHTY

S POMONA FINE SAND WETNLSS DROUGHTY

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

ONA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUG+-ITY

ST JIOHNS FINE SAND WETNESS

i 14. CASSIA FINE SAND DRDU,,-jH-J-Y

5% SLOPE
15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0- DROUGHTY

16 ORSINO FINE SAND (:)--S% SLOPE DROUGHTY

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW

19 POMPANO FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

21. WABASSO FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE DROUGHTY

24 PELLlCER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERL-; SLOW EXCESS SALT

FINE- -.'ANDY LOAM FREOUENTLY F`@00---Erj vvj;---,-rj--c,:

2, &, SPN6ULA MUCK WETNESS

27 ST AUGUS-t'LNE FINE SAND DROUGHTY

LB BEACHES

29 SATELLITE FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

3/14/69 AGE 2

TABLE 21: FEATURES AFFECI ING SOILS USE FOR bl'ti3br-D WATERvipY-S

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

Q WESCONNETT F,INE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNE_Sc:)@

'I FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX DROUGHTY SLOPE
WETNESS DROUGHTY

32 PALM BEACH SAND o-5% SLOPE DROUGHTY

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND DROUGHTY

34 TOCOI FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGH' , Y

215 HONTOCIN MUCK WE'l NESS

_NE3 -Y
36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WE! DROUGHI PERC SLOW

,@8 PITS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

41 TOMOKA MUCK WEINESS

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PEPC SLOW

44 SPPRR FINE: SAND 0-5% SLOPE DR1__'UE*HT`-.'

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM DROUGH`,*Y

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

---____'47_HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS DROUGHTY

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS DROUGHTY PERC SLOW

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS EXCESS SALT

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBS-TRATUM DROUGHTY

__INE DROUGHTY
51 ST AUGUSI -URBAN LAND COMPLEX

FLOODED
52 DURBIN MUCK WETNESS EXCESS SALT

53 LAND COMPLEX WETNESS DROUGHTY

b4 rS7ATLl A--URBA,,-i LANE COMPLEX DROUGH_i Y

5 55 @-IRE__NTS 3-LIDPE

5" ADAMISYILLE VARIANT FINE SAND DROUGHTY

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL WETNESS DROUGHTY PERC SLOW

PAGE 3

TABLE 21: FEATURES AFFEC71NG SOILS USE FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS

SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND WETNESS P-ERC SLOW

63 PLACID FINE SAND W E I - NE 33

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY PERC SLOW

66 TERRA CElA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS

67-TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED WETNESS PERC SLOW EXCESS SALT

66 WINDER FINE SAND WETNESS DROUGHTY PERC SLOW

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK WEI-NESS

A G E

TABLE 22: SOME PHYD-ICAL PROPERTIES JF SOILS

SOIL 601L LAYERS RANGE OF PERMEABILITY PE RICEN-1 0 F C' T101ST BULK
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in. ) (in. /nr) PARTICLE*3 DENS17.y (g/(.:LjMjC Cril)

1.
1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND C) a L0. 00 0 8, 0
8 6. ou 1. C) 7. 0 1.43 11 a

E ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE 0. 0 0 0. 00 1. 3. cl, 1.45

-----3 MYAKKA FINE SAND 0 S. 00 20.00 0. 0 2. 0 1. 36 1.44
53 C). 60 E- 00 L.C.) 8. C) 1.47 1 . 5 9
- 2. i.48 1. 61
5:3 so 6. 04)

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL A.- id, 20. 06 C). L. C) 1.36 1. 44
Flo - 2. C) 8.(- zF7 1. 5@)
31 Bo Fl. C@C) 2C). 00 C). C) 2. 1.48 1 1

5 SET JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 113 f@. 00 20.( 0 1. 4. C) .50
.-)0
13 25 G.-, 20. 00 1. C) 3.0 1. 50 1. 70
25 50 C). 2(-) (,)o 2. 0 G. 0 1.50 1.58
=cj 80 C 0 i2o. C C) 1. C) 4. 0 1.5C 1.65

6
-AVARES FINE SAND o C
1 --b% SLOPE 7 C'. 2(). C)(- C). 5 4.0 1.25 1. 45
7 BC) C)o 0i) Cl. 5 4.(. 1. 40 1.

7 IMMOKALE-E FINE SAND 8 6.00 2(). 0c) 1. 0 5. 0 1.20 1. 5r)
i. C) 5.1- 1.45 i. -,C)
a 20. 00
4-C) 2. 00 '2'. C', 7. C) 1.3C.)
E-4 8,-) El. -)0 20. 00 1. C) 5. 0 1. 40 60

8-ZOLFO FINE SAND o 5 S. 00 20.00 1. Q 5.0 1.40 1.55
5 E-6 G. 00 2(). 1.0 5.0 1. 50 1. Go
8C
69- 0.60 2.(,)o 1. 0 5. C.) 1.50 !.70

9 POMONA FINE SAND 0 6 6. 2c). 1. C) S. 0 1. 20 1. 5(l
C) -).
6 21 6.() 1. () G.o 1. 45 1. T'
Ili 31 0. 60 2. 00 2. 0 7. 0 1.30 1. Flo
s
31 47 6. (Y-) 2C,. 00 I.o E.o 1 . 4 C-,
47 63 0. 20 C). 610 1 G. C) 36.0 1.5"-) 1. 70
63 80 G.ol') 20. 0o 1. 0 6.0 1.45 1. 70

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND C) 14 6. 00 20. 00 1. C) 6. 0 1. 35
14 21 0.60 6. 00 3.0 8.0 1.35 1. 45
Li 32 6. C)o 20. (-)C) v 6. 0 1. 50 1 . F, 5
32 1.+5 0. 60 6. oc) 3. C) B.C.) 1.35 1.45
45 acy E, .-) 0 2"). 00 1.0 S. 0 1.35 4-45

12 ONA FINE SAND C. @ 8 E. on 2c). cio 1. 0 7.0 1. 40 1.55
a 25 0. SO C C) 3.0 8.0 1. 50 5
25 80 6.00 2(-).(-)o 1.0 4.o 1. 50 1 . 6 5

io 6. C)ct
ST JOHNS FINE SAND 0 2C. C C) 1.0 4. 0 1. 30 1. 50
1. 0 15 E. 00 20. 00 1.0 3.0 1.50 1.7(-,,
15 26 C). a 2. 00 2. 0 E. C) 1. 5u 1.58
28 42 6. 00 20.00 1.0 4.0 1.5C) 1.65
42 G 6 0.20 2. 00 E.0 E. 0 1. 50 1.58

P A G E 2

U
1ABLE E2: S.t,iE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS

SOIL SOIL LAYERS RANGE OF PERMEABILITY PERCENT OF C MOIST BULm,
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (irt. (irt. /hr) PARTICLES DENSI7Y (g/CUb3C crei)

13 ST jOHNS FINE SAND G F, 8(:) E. 20. Of-) 1. o 4. C.) 1. 50 1. 6@

CASSIA FINE SAND 18 E@. 2, o C) 1. f.) 4.(--) 1 Z. C.) 1. 5zs
18 3:-. o. E-(.-l E. 00 2. 0 1.30
3L -5 L.. GO 20. 00 1. 0 5.(-.) 1. 40 1. 60
'75 80 0. GO 6.00 2.0 10.0 1.30 1.55

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 0 45 20. 00 0. 00 0. 0 L. 0 1.3@ 11.65
45 57 2.00 6.0o 0. (-) 2. 0 1.45 1 . t-.o
57 80 6. 2c). 1-)(:) 0. 0 2. cl 1.-15 1. E-5

IG ORSINO FINE SAND 0--5% SLOPE la C) I . 0 1.35 1 . F--i 5
18 80, C). C)c) 0. () 2. 0 1 . 35 1.55

------18--F'LORI DANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 18 6.0o 20. 00 3. 0 10. 0 1.40 1. 49
18 26 6. 00 20. 00 1. () 7.(.) 1. 52 1.58
28 6o f-). (Do o.20 15.o 30. C.) 1.60 1. 61:3

19 POMPANO FINE SAND 0 20. cy(-) 0. 00 0. 0 5. 0 1. 30 1.65

-21 WABASSO FINE SAND 0 25 6. (:)o 2(-).oo 5.0 11.25 1.55
25 :3 L 0. SO 2. 00 1. C) 12. Q 1. 50 1".75
0 -@(). (D 1. 60 B0
3 45 0. 0. 20 12.0 Z
45 80 c,
2JQ. 00 2. v 1. 2. 0

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREOUENTLY FLOODED 0 i3 0.60 2.0(-. 10. 0 20. 0 1.25 1. L@,-5
13 34 0. GO
2. ocy 10. 0 2(-. 0 1.50 1 . 65
Z34 52 C). GO G. o 2o.0 1.55 1.7o
52 80 0. 60 E. 00 E. 0 2@-). 0 1.55 1. 70

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-87. SLOPE 0 17 20.00 (D. 00 C) . 2.o -45 1. E@o
17 80 C). C)c) 3. 1.45 1 . Et)

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 1 0. t:16 Q. 20 2,C). C) 4(-'). o F, 0
C). (:,6
10 70 Q. 00 35. 0 SO. 0 0. 50
7 SO C-,. f)c) 10. 00 5. 0 20. 0 1. t:) 1.50

25 PARVWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 10 6. 0o @0. 00 10. 0 Ia. 0 - (10
1 55 C). 06 0. 60 15. C') 22.C.) 1. 30 1. 55
55 8C.) 20. c)() c'; 13.0 1.45 1. EX

C, CSFAMSULA MUCK 0 6. (:w" 0. 0 (D. i.). 25 0. 50
1.
31 E, C'. (:) c 1. 0 1 1 . a
d

i. 4lu
E7 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND 1 cd C'. (,)t') 2c. 0. 0 2. u
10 81) C) 2c). CK) 4. t-d 12. 0 1. 4f-) I . 5

28 BEACHES 913 9 9 99.99 139.1313 1213. 9 99. e3 91. 99 9.139

29 SATELLITE FINE SAND 0 6 20. 0c) 0. 00 1. C3 1. 10 1. '15
6 ao 20.oo 0.00 -0.5 2. 0 1.35 1.55

PACE

F(MABLE 22: SOME Pi@,YSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS

S 0 1. L SOIL LAYERS RANGE OF' PERMEABILITY PERCENT OF C M 0 1 1:3 T BULK
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in. ) (ir, /hr-) PARTICLES DENS I TY (g/cubic: cm.)

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 8 6. 0 0 00 3.. 0 (d 10 1. 40
34 1. 3T-1
45 F1.00 20. CIO 2. 0 7.0 1.35 1.50
- S. 1. 40 1. 65
45 6o 0. Go 00 @.o

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX 0 5 E. 00 20. 00 0. o 5. 0 1.30 1.70
5 Bo G. Oo 2o. Oo o.o 5.0 1.30 1. 70
6 20. 00 1- i. c) 3.0 1. C. 1. Z15
0. 0)
7- F, BO 20. 0. 00 0. 5 2.0 1.35 1. @j5

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% S,-OPE Q BO 20. 00 2. c) c). 0 1.25 1.51)

?3 JONATHAN FINE SAND 0 4 S. 0 c) 20.oo 3. 0 1 . '35
4 71 6. 00 20. Oc) 0. 0 3. 0 I.AO 1. 70
71 SO 0.00 0.20 I.o a. o 1.5-5 1.75

34 TOCOI FINE SAND c@ 13 E. 00 20. 0. C.) 5. 0 1.35 1.45
13 23 2. 0 10 i.Go
1 20.00-- 2. 0 1.45
,@.3 45 6. 00 20. 00 Q. Q 5.0 1. 15 1. 50
45 2. 00 E. 01:1 3. c) i. 5C.) 60
SO 0. E-0 El. Q 1. 0 0 - i.60
2.0 i '. 0 1. 40

'35 HONTOON MUCK 0 55 C.Oo 20. 00 0. (" 0. 0. 22 C.38
35 B 0 Fl. 00 ::.0. cjr@ 0 5. 0 i.30 1. 55

36 RIVIERAFINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 23 6. 00 20. 00 1. C.) G. C) 1. 40 1 . 65
21 23 28 0. 00 0. 20 12. 0 25.0 1.50 1.70
28 71 (-).oo 0.20 15.0 25.0 1.50 1.70
71 SO c). 60 6. 00 1.0 B. 0 1. 40 1.65

38 IPITS 0 0 0.00 o. c)O C). 0 O.C.) (-).oo 0. 00

+O-POTTSBURG FINE SAND 0 G 0 E. 00 20.()0---- 0. 5. o - 1.2.0 1. Z15
so 80 (d. 60 P. 00 2. Ol 6.0 1.3o 1.50

41 TOMOKA MUCK 0 21 E,. 00 20. 00 5.0 0. 0 0. 25 0. 30
2 1 80 ().6() 6.00 15.(. 30.0 1. GO 1.70

42-BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 3 Fl. 00 20. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0.25 0. 50
3 9 0. 20 0.6o 20. 0 4o.0 0.65 1.25
9 25 (). 06 0. 20 20. 0 40. 0 1. 30 1. 50
25 53 0. 06 0. 20 20. c) 40. 6 1. 30 i. 50
8c) 0. 06 0. LO 0 40. c) 1. 1. tic)

44 33PAIRF, FINE SAND (:)-5,,' 51-OPE 2( . 00 i.o 5.o I. 2c) 1.50
%) i
3 6 a 6. 00 20. c)(.) i. (J 5. 0 1 . 55 1. 70
F, a 80 0 . 6 C, L. ()0 15. C) :32. 0 1.55 1 . 7(-.y

A5 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSIRATUM 0 21 6.(-.)0 20. 00 1.0 6.0 1.30 1.40
21 43 2.00 2o. 00 4.0 12.0 1.4o 1.55
48 53 0. 20- 0. 60----15. 0- 20. 0 1. 40- 1. 60
53 80 0.00 0.06 60.0 85.0 1.60 1.70

PAGE 4

TABLE 22: SOME PH@:SICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS

SOIL SOIL LAYERS RANGE OF PERMEABILI-TY PERCENT OF C MOIST BULK
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH i ri. ) (in. /hr) PARTICLES DENSITY (g/cubic cm)

,4 G HOLOPAW FINE SAND 5. -7. C) 1 . 3tj 1. 60
53 72 0. 2o 2.(
13. 0 28.o 1. Fo
7E C. 7. 0 1- 3. 0 50 1. 60

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREPUENTLY FLOODED 0 5( 6.00 00 -0
0 5.0 1.20 1. t,
50 tS s F,(:) 2. r)() 16. 0 14. C 50 70
8C
6 d G.uu 20. 00 6. 0 12.C.) 1.20 1.60

0 D.00
48 WINDER FINE SAND FR= aT@Y FLOODED 11 6. 00 2( 1 . 0 G. 0 1. 40 1.65
il 16 6. 20 0. 60 il). C-) la.0 1. 45 1. 65
16 42' 0. 00 0. 20 20. 0 30. 0 1 . F, C, 70
8(-) o.oo 1. 50 1.7o
42 (D. 2o 15. 0 30. o

149 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED C) 22 20. C)c) Q. lCy 2. 0 1. 40 1.55
22 29 2. 00 20. 00 2.0 8.0 1.45 1.60
29 2 C) . k.-) 0 u. 00 0. 0 E. 0 1.45 1 . 5 5

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM, 3 20.00 (J. @Y-) 1. Cj 5.(-) 1.4o 1. @DQ
3 11 2 00 C). C)") 1. 0 5.1- 1. 40 1.110
11 14 20. 00 (-).oo 2.o G . 0 1.45 1 . Go
14 80 6. 00 1. 0 5. 0 1.40 1. 50

51 ST AUSUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX o 11 2(-... 00 o. 0 2.0 1 . 30 1.40
I L. 0@-) 2,:). L. 0 1. 40 1 . 255

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 59 E.oo 20. 0o 0. 0 0.0 0.20 50
59 a(:) G. 00 2o. 00 2. 0 5. 0 1. 30 1. 45

53 1MMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 0 G Fl. 00 20. 00 !.0- 5.0-- i. 20 1.50
E. 42 F- 00 a(:). 00 1. 0 5. cj 1.45 1. 70
42 66 0. GO 2. oQ 2. 0 7.o 1.3o r:-,Go
-7 C-1 F 80 6. 00 20. 00 1.0 5.0 1.40 Ir. E-0

'LANE) COMPLEX 6o 3.o 1.45 1.60
54 ASTATULA-URBAN 0 2o. o0 0.0 i.o

55 ARENTS (.-)-P% SLOPE 0 C). C)c) Q (-",. C) 0.

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND 1 20. oo 0.00 2.0 8.0 1.05 1.44
10 80 E. @'- 20. 00 1. 0 5.0 1. 30 1.58
0.)

58 EAUL-ALLIE Fl.,4E SAND 0 17 6. (.10 20. 0 5. 0 1.25 1. SO
17 2 0. 60 6 . 0 8. 0 1. A5 I .
E-@ 53 G. 00 1.0 5.0 1 - 4,5 1.65
53 58 0. 0 2. 00 13. 0 31.0 1.55 1. -0
58 80 G_ 1.0 13. (D 1.45 1.55
Ql. bc-)

61 RIVITERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 0 25 G. 00 20. 00 1. 0- 6.0- 1. 40 1.65
25 35 0. 00 0.2o 12. 0 25. 0 1.50 1.70
35 55 cy. 00 0. 20 15. 0 25. 0 1. 50 1.70
55 so 0.60 S. 00 1. 0- - 8.- 0 1.40 1.65

m m m m m m m m m -m - m m m m m --m -- -- m m m

PA- E 5

TABLE 22. SOME PHYSIf"AL PROPERT IES DF S-'f3ILS

SOIL SOIL LAYERS RANGE OrF PERMEABILITY PERCENT OF C MOIST BULK
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in.) (in. /hr) PARTICLES DENSITY (g/cubic cnij

F- Cc- 2 . 0 10. 0 1. @iQ 1. 49
62 FLORILANA FINE LPNl)
fs.
i.ba -s8
30 6 0 0. ")C) LO 15.@ 30. 0 i. 60 .69

63 PLACID FINE SAND 0 12 S. (m) o. 0 1 o. 0 1 . E, C', 4f",
12 PC) 6. 00 20. 00 0.0 10. 0 1.30

G.oO 1. 0 5.0 1.35 1.45
mi 64 ELLZEY FINE SAND 0 12 2. (:)o
M 3! 12 37 2.00 6. 00 2. 0 G. 0 1.35 1.50
'14; 37 58 0. GO 2. OC B.C 14. C
5Cj 1.Go
58 00 c. 00 2. 0 7. 0 1.40 1.60

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND 28 6. 00 2C). 00 1 . C) 6. 0 1. 4C 1.65
28 40 Cl. 20 IL. C 25.0 1.50 1.70
40 65 0.20 15. 0 25. o 1. 50 1.70
65 80 u. &0 Fl. 00 1. C) 8. 0 1.4C 1. E13
;2ol

EE lEqRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED- 0 SO 6. C)o 20.00 0. C, C.).0 0.15 0. 35
R2!

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY 77LOODED 0 16 E. L, 0 C. cl 0. 0. Lo ).50
18 65 C).OO OG EQ. 0 85.0 1.25 1.55

68 WINDER FINE SAND 0 1 C) S. 00 2c). t:)C@ 1. C) 6.C-) 1. LiO i.E5
1 C) 14 (j. 0. SO 1 (D. 0 18. 0 1.45 1
14 56 cm:) C). 20 2,C). 0 -(:). C) 1. 60, 1. 70
56 SC) U.00 O.2c., 15. 0 3o.o 1.5C 1.70

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK 0 5 6.o(.,) 20. (DO 0.0 8.0 0. 20 0. 55
.33i 5 41 2.00 6. (DO 1. 0 10.0 1.40 1.65
41 59 0. G 0 2. 00 1 C). 0 l a. 0 1. F10 1.70
59 86 2.00 6.oo l.o lo. 0 1.40 1 . G5

A2,

Sri

PAGE 1

1 ABLE 23: SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SOIL PROPERTIES

SOIL SOIL LAYERS AVAILABLE WATER
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in. ) CAPACITY (in. /iri. ) SOIL PH

1 ADAMS-VILLE FINE SAND 0 8 (.).(-')5 o. I (D 4.5 7.8
a bo 0. 03 0. 08 4.5 7 . 8

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8Y. SLOPE cl so C). C.12 0. 05 4.5 6. 5

-3-MYAKKA FINE SAND 0 23 0. 02 0. 05 3.6 6.5
23 53 1(:) 0.15 3.6 6. 5
53 80 0. 02 0. 05 3.6 6.5

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 0 17 0. 02 0. 05 3.6 6.5
17 31 0.10 0.15 3.6 6. 5
31 so 0.02 o.o5 3.6 G. 5

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 0 13 1 0.15 3.6 5.5
13 25 0. 03 0. 08 3. S-5. 5---'-
25 5(.) (D. 10 o.3o 3. G 5.5
50 SO 0. 03 0. 08 3.6 5.5

6 -11-AVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE o 7 C). 05 (D. 10 3.6 6. 0
7 a 0 0. 02 0. 05 4.5 E,. C)

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND a 05 10
o. 3.6 6.0
a 40 0. 02 0. 05 3. F, 6. 0
40 F, 4 o. 1 C) 0. 25 3 . G G.0
6.4 so 0. 02 0. 05 @@. 6 E,. 0

7.--S ZOLFO-FINE SAND------- 5 0.10 0.15 4 * -5-7 '3-----
5 66 0. 03 1 C) 4.5 7.3
66 80 0. 10 0.25 3.6 6.5

9 POMONA FINE SAND 0 E 0.05 0.1o 3.6 5.5
6 21 0. 03 0. 08 3.6 5.
21 31- 0.10 0.15-3.6 5. @L
31 47 0. 03 0. 08 3.6 5. 5-
47 63 (.).13 0. 17 3. 6 5.5
E 3 80 o.o3 C.). 08 3.6 5.5

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND 14 0.03 0.07 3.6 7.3
14 21 0. i 0 0. 15 3.6 7.3
21 32 0.03 o.07 4.5 5.5
32 45 0.10 0.15 135. 6 7.3
45 8o 0.13 0. 07 3. 6- 7.1-:5

12 DNA FINE SAND 0 a 0.10 o.15 3. G G. 0
8 25 C). 10 o.15 3.6 6.0
25 @o 0.03 o.os 3.6 6.o

JOHNS FINE SAND - 10-- C) .- I (Y- -G-. -i 5-737-.E- 5--
3 ST
10 15 0. 03 0. 08 3. 6 5. 5
15 28 0.10 0.3o 3.6 5.5
2B-- 42-- 0. 03 0. 08- - 3. &- 5-. 5--
42 66 0.1o 0.30 3.6 5.5

PAGE 2

TABLE -3: SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SOIL PROPERTIES

SOIL SOIL LAYERS AVAILABLE WATER
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (irt. ) CAPACITY (in. /in. ) SOIL pH

13 ST JO NS FINE SAND 66 80 0. 08 3.6 5.5

14 CASSIA PINE SAND 0 16 0. 07 4.5 G.
is 32 0. 10 0. 15 4.5 6.0
32 75 0. 0,3 0. (-')7 4.5 6. 0
- 75 a() o.lo 0.15 4.5 6.0

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 1) 45 0.05 4.5 6. 0
45 57 0. Icy Cy. 30 4.5 G.
57 80 0.02 05 4.5 6.

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE o -,a 02 0. 08 3.6 G. 0
18 J 0. 02 06 3. G 6.(-.)

@18-FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 is 10 0.20 4. 5- 8.-4-----
16 28 0. 05 0. 10 4.5 8.4
o.10 0.20 4.5
28 80 8.4

1
-OMPANO FINE SAND 0 80 (-.(2
9 P 0. 05 4.5 7.8

--21-WABASSO FINE SAND 0 25 0. 02 05 4--5 6;-Ij -
25 32 0. 10 C.).15 4.5 7.3
:@21 45 cy. 1 0. 15 5.1 8.4
45 80 0.05 10 7.4 3.4

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED @o 13 o.15 0.25 5. G 8.4
13 34 10 0.15 6. 6- 7. 8-
34 52- O.o8 0.15 7.4 8.4
52 SO 0. 08 0. 15 7.4 8.4

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE 0 17 0. 02 0.05 3.6 7.3
- 0.05
17 au ().02 3.6 7.3

PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAry', FREQUENTLY FLOODED c) lo 0.20 0.30 6.1 8. A
10 7o 0. 15 0. 20 6.1 8.4
70 SO 0. o5 0. 10 G. 1 8.4

25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 10 0.15 0.26 6.6 6.4
10 55 0. 1(.) 0.20 7.4 8.4
55 80 0.05 0.22 7.4 6.4

26 SAMSULA Nl',jCK C) 31 0.20 0.25 4.5 5.5
31 8t) C). 6@, C. (-')5 @@. 6 5.5

27 ST AUGUSI'THE SAND c.) 11) C . (), 2 o. 05 6.1 8.4
10 80 0. 05 0. 1 (.) G. 1 8.4

28 BEACHES 99 99 9.99 9.99

E9 SATELLITE FINE SAND 0 G 0. 02 0. 10 4.5 7.8
0. 05 4--a 7- 8-
6 so 0.02

3/ 14/89 PAGE 3

TABLE 23: SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEM7 . CAL SOIL PROPERTIES

SOIL SOIL LAYERS AVAILABLE WATER
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in. ) CAPACI-fy (in. /in. ) 501L PH

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 8 0.15 3.6 6.5
a 34 0. 10 0. 15 3.6 S. 5
34 45 0. 05 0. o8 -1.6 6.5
80 o. I C, 0. 15 3. F, G. 5

-31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX 0 5 0. 02 0.08 5.1 7.8
5 0
1 C.). 03 5. E. 7.8
6 6. ('.)2 Q. 10 4.5 7.8
F, 8 0 0. 02 0.05 4.5 7.8

32 PALM BEACH SAND o-5% SLOPE 0 so 0.02 o.05 7.4 6.4

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND 0 4 0.05 0.08 4.5 5.5
4 71 0. () I O.o5 5.1 6. o
71 80 0.10 Q. 15 3.6 5.0

34 TOCCI FINE SAND 0 13 cl. 02 0. 10 3.6 7.3
23 0. 05 0.15 3.6 5.5
13
23 45 0.02 O.io 3.6 5.5
45 76 10 0. 20 3.6 5.5
76 P, 0 0.05 0.15 3.6 5.5-

35 HONTOON MUCK 0 55 0.20 0.25 4.5 5.5
55 80 0. 15 0. 2 10 A.5 5.5

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND.FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 23 Q.05 0.08 4.5 7.3
23 28 o. 10 0.14 F, -1 8.4-
28 71 0.12 4). 15 6.1 8.4
71 80 0. 05 0. 08 7.9 8.4

38 PITS o 0 0. 00 0.00 0. 0 0. 0

-40-'POTTSBURG FINE SAND 0 F, 0 0. 03 0. 07-- 4..5-1- ' 5-----
Go 80 o.o7 0.10 4.5 6.0

41 TOMOKA MUCK 0 21 (D.3".) 0.50 3.6 4 " 4
21 60 O.io 0.15 3.6 4.4

42-BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 3 0.20 0.25 3.6 6.0
9 0. 18 0. 20 5. G 7.3
9 '25 u.12 0.17 S. 1 8.4
25 53 cl. 12 (). .17 G. 1 8.4
53 8(-) 0. 12 o.17 7.4 8.4

44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 0 3 0. os 0.12 4.5 6.5
3 G 8 0. 05 0. 08 4.5 G. 5
G 8 80 0. 11 o.15 4.5 6.5

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM 0 21 0.02 0.05 6.1 8.4
21 A-8 0. 05 0.10 6.1 8.4
48 53 0.10 0.20 E.' 1- 8 , 4-----
5.3 so 0. 15 0. 20 6.1 8.4

3/14/89 PAGE 4

TABLE 23: SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SOIL PROP;ERIIES

SOIL SOIL LAYERS AVAILABLE WATER
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in.) CAPACITY (in. /in. ) SOIL PH

HOLOPAW FINE SAND o 5---- 0. 07 0. 10 5. 1 7. 3,
53 72 0. 15 20 5.1 8.4
72 80 0. 05 1 C." 5.1 8. 4

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 50 0. 03 Q. 07 5.1 7.3
50 6 8 0. 10 0.15 5. 1 8.4
F, a 8o 0.05 0. 10 4.5 8.4

-.)Z -8
48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 1 0.0 5.6 7.8
11 16 0. 06 0. 10 6.1 7.6
16 42 0. 10 C). 15 G . F, 3.4
42 80 0. 0E. 0. 12 7.4 8.4

---49-MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 22 0. 02 o.05 6.1- B.4
22 29 0. 10 0. 15 4.5 C.5
29 8.0 0. va 0.05 4.5 6.5

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM 0 3 u. 03 o. 10 3. G G. o
I 1 0. 2 C. 05 3. G G. 0
11 14 o.o5 o.10 5.1 6.5-
14 80 C.). 05 10 6.6 6.4

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLE*i 1 02 05 S. 1 30. -1
I C) 8 C). (:)5 0. 10 E- 1 8.4

-52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 59 0. 20 0. 25 3.6 7. 3,---
59 60 0. 10 Q.15 3.6 8.4

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 0 6 0.05 0.10 3.6 6.0
G 42 0. 02 0. 05 3. F, G. 0
42 66 10 o.25 3. 6 G. o
66 80 0. U2 0.05- 3.6 6.0

54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX o 80 o. (:)2 o. 05 4.5 6.5

55 ARENTS C)--E,% SLOPE 0 0 C). t)c) o. 00 0. 0 0.0

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND 0 10 0. 10 0.15 6.1 8.4
10 SO 0. 05 0. 10 6. F, 6.4

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND 0 17 02 07 4.5
17 23 CE. 15 0. "15 4.5 6. 5
2.3 53 Q .()2 0. o5 5.1 7.8
53 58 0. 10 0. 20 5.1 7.8
58 8o C).05 o.15 5.1 7.8

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 0 25 0.05 0. 08 4.5 7 * 3-----
25 35 C). Ic.) 0.14 6.1 6.4
35 55 0.12 v.15 G. 1 8.4
55 80 0.05 0. 08 7.9 8. 4m-

PAGE 5

TABLE 23: SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SOIL PROPERTIES
7
SOIL SOIL LAYERS AVAILABLE WATER
NO. SOIL NAME DEPTH (in. CA@----AC Il Y (i i rt. ) SOIL PH

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND IC) .+ B./A
0. Iu 4.5 8.
30 80 20 4.5 8.4

63 PLACID FINE SAND 0 12 E). 15 20 3.6 5.5
12 BE) 0. 05 0. 08 3.6 S. 5

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND 0 1 iR lo o. 20 5.6 7.3
12 37 C). I c.) 0.15 5.6 7.3
37 58 C.). 15 C.). 20 4.5 7.3
58 80 0. 10 E). 15 4.5 7. 3

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND o 28 0.05 0. 08 4.5 7. 3
28 40 - -
J. 10 0.14 6. 1 8.4
-40-- G 5 0. 12 0.15 G. 1 8.4
65 BE), 05 0. 08 7.9 8.4

66-1 ERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 so E). 3o 0. 5o 5. G 8.4

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED ja E). 2,15 C. -,5 E.. 1 -.8
E5 C". 115 Cj. 2E) F- 1 7.8

68 WINDER FINE SAND o lo )3 C). 08 5.6 7.8
I,-,, -,C. E). 1 0 G. 0
14 56 0. 1 o (J. 15 6.6 B.4
G 0. 12 7. iq B.A
56 so

69 SAKERSVILLE MUCK 0 5 o.20 0.25 4.5 5.5
5 41 C@. I (1 20 4.5 5.5
41- 59 0. 1 o 0. 20 4.5 5.5
59 BF, 0. (-.)5 IF, 4.5 5.5

14/89 PAGE I

TABLE 2*4: SOIL LIMITATIONiS* FOR SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. B01L NAME LIMITAII I ON KIND OF LIMI"IFATIONS

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

L ASTATULA FINE SAND (:)-61/ SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

4 MYA@IKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE PONDING

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE CUl'BANKS CAVE PONDING

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE CUT2ANKS CAVE WETNESS

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

9 POMONA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTEANKS CAVE] WETNESS

--12 ONA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

13 S7 JOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE. WETNESS

i4 CASSIA FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE cuTE:Aro@s CAVE WETNESS

1E ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREDUENTLY FLOODE'D SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

19-POMPANO FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

El WADASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS

---23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE
SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

14-4RKWOUI) INE SANDY LOAM FREQUEN-TLY FLOODED SEVERE CU i BANIIIS CAVE WETNESS

2E, spity"SULA MIUCK, SEVERE CUTBANlyS CAVE POND I NG EXCESS HUMUS

E7 Sl AUGUETINE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

28 BEACHES

29-SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS------

3/14/8S PAGE 2

TABLE 24: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS

SOIL DEBREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 'SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX SEVERE CUTBANKE) CAVE *FRIPP
SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS *SATEL

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE CUTgANKS CAVE

@3 JONATHAN FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

35 IONTOON MUCK SEVERE PONDING EXCESS HUMUS

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

-8 PITS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

41 TOMOKA MUCK SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE PONDING EXCESS HUMUS

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS

44 SPARR FINE SAND ()-5,/ SLOPE SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

---47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED-
SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS'-__

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTS _KS CAVE WETNESS
49 MiDULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE CUTBA@iql'_S CAVE WETNESS FLOODING

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

51 S7* AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS EXCESS HUMUS

53 IMIMOKALE-E-URRAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

54 AE-I'ATULA-URSAN LA.,"qD COINPLEX SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE

t.tj AREENTS 0-2@'-@ OPE

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS-----------

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE PONDING

3/14/89 PAGE 3

i-ABLE 24: SO I L L liAi I TAI IONS FOR SHALLOW E XCAVA' I ONS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

62 FLOPIDANA F'I NE SAIND SEVERE CU CAVE WETNESS

63 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBAN,'-lS CAVE WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE CU-17BANKS CAVE WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS EXCESS HUMUS

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE CUTBANKS CAVE WETNESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE CUTBANKS* CAVE POND I NG

3/14/8,3 PAGE 1

iAl-.,LE 25: SOIL LlMiTATIO-NS FOR DWELLING UNI-i'S WITHOUT BASEMENIS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND C)-.B% SLOPE SLIGHT

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

5 ST-JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNE3S

B-ZOLFC--FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

9 POMONA FINE SAND 'SEVERE WEI-NESS

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

-.--12--ONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

13 S7 JOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

15-POMELLO-FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

18 FLORlDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

POMPANO FINE- SAND SEVERE WETNESS

21 WABASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SLIGHT

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

L5 --,Ail-KWOOD ;71NE C-*@ANDY LO@01 FREQUENTLY FLODUED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

2, F, SANSULA MUCK SEVERE PONDING LOW STREN'.GTH

2'7 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND SEVERE FLOODING

28 BEACHES

-.9-SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

.3/ .14/89 P AG E 2

-fABLE 25: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS WITHOU-T BASEMENTS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

3(_1 WESCONNET--l- FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE W ET N, ES S FLOODING

FRIP-SATELL11E COMPLEX MODE-RATE' Ew-LDPE *F FIR I PP
E. EV E F-,E W E 11 IN E S 15 @rSA'f EL

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND SLIGHT

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

35 HONTOON MUCK SEVERE PONDING L3W STRENGTH

3
o FLOODING
RIVIERA FINEE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WEI

38 PITS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

41 ONOKA MUCK SEVERE P LIN D G LOW STRENIG !'I

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

44 SPARR T71NE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

45 61 AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE FLOODING

-NESS
46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE WEl

-------47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

4 9MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREG!UFNT_,Y FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM MODERATE WETNESS

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE FLOODING

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING LOW STRENGTH

53 1MMOKALEE-URBAN LAI"Z' Cr-',rvlr:,LEX SEVERE WETNESS

54 r,@`@Tl U;_A-UfRBAN LAND C'OM,:' 17X S" IG H T

Q-c% SLOPE

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

56 EAUGALI-TE FINE SAND 'SEVERE WETNESS

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

3/14/89 PAGE 3

TABLE 25- ISOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS WITHOUT BASEMENTE3

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF' LIMITATIONS

62' FLORIDANA FINE SAND S. E V E RE WETHESS

6 3PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE WE@NESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS LOW STRENGTH

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODEED SEVERE WETNESS FLUODINO SHPIN@'--SWELL

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WEI-NESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE PUNDING

PAGE I

TABLE EG: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS WITH BASEMENTS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

1ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

_--2-ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-6% SLOPE SLIGHT

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

5-ST-JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

FINE SAND-- SEVERE WETNESS

9 POMONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNE.SS

il SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

12 ONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

1.3 ST JOHNS FINE: SAND SEVERE WETNESS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

------15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE WETNESS

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

18 FLORIDANA FINE. SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

19 POMPANO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

21 WABASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SLIGHT

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

L5 PAR11"WOOD, F!ll,,'E SA,,,@DY LO;@4M FREQUENTLY @LOODED SEVERE WEINESS FLOODING

26 SAMSULA MUCK SEVERE PONDING

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE7 SAND SEVERE WETNESS FLOOD I N110

28 BEACHES

__29 SATEL-L 17E_ F I NE --SAND-- SEVERE WETNESS

3/ 1-4/89 PAGE 2

TABLE 26. SOIL LIMITATiON'S FOR DWELLING U1,41TS WITH P-ASEMIE,@ S

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

I FRIP--SA'fE_,LlTE COMPLEX MULERATE SLOPE *F R I PP
SEVERE WE T t 4 E S SA TEL

PALM BEACH SAND o--5% SLOPE SLIGHT

-6-3 JONATHAN FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE WEI-NESS

-35 HONTOON M SEVERE PONDING
C UCK

SEVERE WEI-NESS FLOODING
'E RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

38 PITS

40-PUTTSBURG FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

41 (IM.11OKA MUCK SEVERE POND ING

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

44 @-,PARR F"NE SAND 0-5"/. '_;Lnrnr@ SEVERE WEl"NES;*

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

47 IHOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS -FLOODING

48 W f@i DER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

49 MDLi,.TRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSI-RATUM SEVERE WETNESS

51 ST AUGUc_,TINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

DUENTLY FLOODED
52 DURBIN MUCK FREG SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

5:-@ -iMT,.OKAl_=_E-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE WETNESS

5-+ f.-*,.S7ATULA--URBAN LAND COMPLEX SLIGHT

55 1-_@RENTS 0-2% SLOPE

57-ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

G! RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

PAGE

7ABLE 26: SOIL LIMI-IATIONS FOR DWELLING UNIIS WI-FH BASEMENTS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

63 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

L5 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

E-9 BAKEPSVILLE MUCK SEVERE PONDING

PAGE

TABLE 27: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE MODERATE SLOPE

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

5-ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

F, TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

9 POMONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

-12 ONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND MODERA-1E WETNESS

7-15-POMEL-LO-FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

lE, ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

19-POMPANO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

21 WABASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

-.%--23-PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE MODERATE SLOPE

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

25 ,-;AiR["WCJCjD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WE] NESS FLOODING

26 SAMSULA MUCK SEVERE PONDING LOW STRENGTH

L7 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND SEVERE FLOODING

28 BEACHES

7-;--29 SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS----

3/14/89 PAGE 2

TABLE 27: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX MODERATE SLOPE *FRIPP
SEVERE WETNESS *SATEL

32' PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND SLIGHT

34 TOCO! FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

35 HONTOON MUCK SEVERE POND I NG LOW STRENGTH

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

38 PITS

-----40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

41 TOMOKA MUCK SEVERE PONDING LOW STRENGTH

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

--------44 SPARP FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE FLOODING

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

4-7-HOLOPAW FINE-SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING
49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE W@TNESS FLOODING

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM MODERATE WETNESS

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE FLOODING

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENI'LY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING LOW STRENGTH

53- 1 MMOKALEE-- URBAN LANE L, COMPLEX SEVERE WETNESS

54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SLIGHT

55 ARENTS 0-2% SLOPE

57 ADAMSV I LLE- VA R I ANT F I NE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL, SEVERE PONDING

3/14/89 PAGE 3

TABLE 27: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL BUlLDINGS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF' LIMITATIONS

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND SEVERE W E TN -1: S S

63 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS LOW STRENGTH

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING SHRINK-SWELL

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WEI-NESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE PONDlNG

PAGE I

TABLE 28: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATONS

I ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SLIGHT

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE WEI-NESS

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

------5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

9 POMONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

12 ONA PINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND MODERA7E WETNEz@S

POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SLIGHT

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

19 POMPANO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

21 WABASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

23 PAOLA FTNE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SLIGHT

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING LOW STRENGTH

25 FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY Fl-OODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

26 SAMSULA MUCK SEVERE PONDT NG

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS FLOODING

28 BEACHES

297SATELLITE FINE-SAND MODERATE WETNESS

PAGE 2

TABLE 26: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS

SOIL DEGREE OF
LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATONS
NO. SOIL NAME

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS *PONDING

FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX MODERATE SLOPE *FRIPP-
MODERATE WETNESS *SATEL

_-32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-57' SLOPE SLIGHT

33 JONATHAN F71NE SAND SLIGHT

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

35 HONTODN MUCK SEVERE PONDING LOW STRENGTH

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

38 PITS

40-POTTSBURG FI NE_ SAND SEVERE WETNESS

41 TOMOKA MUCK SEVERE PONDING

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING LOW STRENGTH

44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM MODERATE WETNESS FLOODING

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

47-HOLOPAW FINE SAND-FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM MODERATE WE-NESS

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX MODERATE WETNESS VLOODING

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE WETNESS

54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SLIGHT

55 AREN'TS C-2% S-LOPE

-'--57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

3/!4/89 PAGE

TABLE 2`8: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS

SOIL
DEGREE OF
NO- SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITAIDNS

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

63 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

---647 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIR MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS LOW STRENGTH

----67 -T7SotqlA MUCKY PEPT FREOUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WEI-NESS FLOODING L014 STRENGTH

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WEI-NESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE PONDING

3/14/89 PAGE

TABLE 29: SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

I ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND MODERATE DROUGHTY 00 SANDY

ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SEVERE DROUGHTY

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

4 MYAKKA FINE: SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE POND I NG

- SEVERE PONDING
5 ST JOHNS-F'INE SAND DEPRESSIONAL

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE DROUGHTY

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS DROUGHTY

.,-------S-'ZOLFO- FINE SAND- MODERATE DROUGHTY TOO SANDY

9 POMONA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

3.1 SMYRNA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

FINE SAND SEVERE W E T NESS

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

14 CAS3IA FINE SAND MODERATE WETNESS D-ROUGH-'Y

15 POMELLO-FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE DROUGHTY

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE DROUGHTY

J.8 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE: WETNESS FLOODING

POMPANO FINE SAND
SEVERE WETNESS DROUGHTY

C:l WABASSO FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WEI-NESS FLOODING

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE SEVERE DROUGHTY

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS EXCESS SULFUR EXCESS SALT

25 :,ARKWOGD FlINE SANDY LOAMI FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

11 E SAMSULP MUCK
SEVERE PONDING EXCESS HUMUS

L@* 7S-T AUGUSTINE FINE SAND MODERATE DROUGHTY

28 BEACHES

29 SATELLITE FINE SAND SEVERE DROUGHTY

PAGE 2

TABLE 29: SO!;- LIMITATIONS FOR LAWNS ANID LANIkICAPING

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

3C.) WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

-31-FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX SEVERE D ROUGH-r Y *FRIPP
S E V E RE DROUGHTY *SATEL

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE SEVERE DROUGHTY

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND SEVERE DROUGHTY

34 TOCOI FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

5- HONTOON MUCK SEVERE PONDING EXCESS HUMUS

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

38 PITS

-40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND--- SEVERE WETNESS DROUGHTY

41 I-Or,10KA MUCK SEVERE PONDING EXCESS HUMUS

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

--------44 SPARR F71NE SAND o--5% SLOPE MODERATE WETNESS DROUSHTY

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM MODERATE DROUGHTY

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS DROUGHTY

--47 HOLOPAW-FINE-SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESS FLOODING EXCESS SALT

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM MODERATE DROUGHTY

51 S7 AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX MODERATE DROUGHTY

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WEI-NESS FLOODING EXCESS SALT

5,Z I-MMOKALEE-URDAIN LAND CrIMPLEX SEVERE WETNESS DROUGHTY

54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE DROUGHTY

55 ARENTS 0-2% SLO-PE

57 ADPMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND MODERATE DROUGHTY SMALL STONES

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS DROUGHTY

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL SEVERE PONDING

PAGE

TABLE 29: SOIL LlMITAI-IONS FOR LAWNS AND LANDSCAF-qNG

SOIL DEGREE OF
NO. SOIL NAME LIMITATION KIND OF LIMITATIONS

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

63 PLACID FINE SAND SEVERE WE" NIESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREOUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE W ET NES5 EXCESS HUMUS

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE WETNESc-:1 EXCESS SULFUR EXCESS SAL7

68 WINDER FINE SAND SEVERE WETNESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK SEVERE F,ONDING EXCESS HUMUS

PAGE

TABLE 30. RESTRIC-.@IVE SOIL FEATURES FOR SOILS AS A SOURCE OF ROADFILL

SOIL SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME RATING RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND FAIR WETNESS

---2. ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE GOOD

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL POOR WETNESS

___5-ST JOHNS'FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL POOR WETNESS-

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE GOOD

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

-ZOLFO- FINE SAND- FAIR--- WETNESS----

9 POMONA FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND' POOR WETNESS

1-2-ONA FINE-SAND POOR WETNESS

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND FAIR WETNESS

15-POMELLO-FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE FAIR WETNESS

16 ORSINO FINE SAND (-.)-5% SLOPE GOOD

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

19-POMPANO__FINE SAND- POOR WETNESS

L@,l WABASSO FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE GOOD

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR LOW STRENGTH WETNESS

`5 P11,
IRKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

26 SAMSULA MUCK POOR WETNESS

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND FAIR WETNESS

r3 28 BEACHES

_@_29_SATELLITE- FINE SAND' FAIR---- WETNESS--

PAGE 2

TABLE 30: RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES :70R SOILS AS A SOURCE OF- ROADFILL

SOIL SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME RATING RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED Poor, WETNESS

3 1FRiP-SATELLITE COMPLEX

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE GOOD

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND GOOD

34 TOCOI FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

35 HONTOON MUCK POOR -OW STRENGTH WETNESS

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

---38 -PITS-- - -

40 POTT3BURG FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

41 TOMOKA MUCK POOR WETNESS

---42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS SHRINK-SWELL------

44 SPARR FINE SAND 0--5% SLOPE FAIR WETNESS

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE 'SAND CLAYEY SUBSI-RATUM FAIR WETNESS

--46--HOLOPAW-FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

4-3-MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

5,-1NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM FAIR WETNESS

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX FAIR WETNESS

52-DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX POOR WETNESS

5-'1 AS ATULP--URBAN LAND COMPLEX GOOD

55 ARENTS 0-2% SLOPE

57 ADAMSVILLE VPRIANT FINE 13AND FAIR WETNESS

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

b17-RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL- POOR WETNESS-

PAGE 3

TABLE 30: RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES FOR S-OILS AS A SOURCE OF ROADFIL@

SOIL SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME RATING RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

S3 PLACID FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND POOR WETNESS

TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR LOW STRENGTH WETNESS

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR LOW STRENGTH WETNESS SHRINK-SWELL

66 WINDER FINE SAND POOR WEI-NESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK POOR WETNESS

3/14/89 PAGE I

TABLE 31- PROBABILITY OF FINDING AGGREGATES SUITABLE: FOR USE

SOIL PROBABILITY REASON FOR PROBABILITY REASON FOR
NO. SOIL NAME FOR SAND IMPROBABILITY FOR GRAVEL IMPROE.,ABILITY

I ADANSVILLE FINE SAPID PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SIPNDY

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE PROBABLE I MPROBADLE TOO SANDY

3 NYAKKA FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

4 MYAKKA, FINE SAND DEPIR-ESSIONAL PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

7 1MMOKIALEE FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND PROBABLE I MPROBABLE TOO SANDY

9 F'a,'iOfqA FINE SAND IMPROBABLE THIN LAYER IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

11. SMYRNA FIINE SAND PROBABLE' I M P R 0 B A ',-*,, L E1-00 SANDY

12 ONA FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

11 ST jOHNS F114E SAND PROBABLE I IMP ROBABLE TOO SANDY

14 CASSIA FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE 1-00 SANDY

15 POMELIO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE PROBABLE IMPROBABLE--TOO SANDY

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

IS FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

--19 POMPANO FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE- TOO SANDY-

LI WAPASSO F I NE SAND IMPROBABLE THIN LAYER IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

22 MANA-i'EE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES iMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

23-PACLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOG SANDY

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

FINES
IMPROBABLE
PARr'lw@,OD FINI@ -ANDY LOA,1,1. FREC-UEPO'LY F-100DED IMPROBABLE EXCESS, INES

2 G SAMSULA MUCK PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

E7 c-)- AUGUSTINE FINE SAfAD PROBABLE IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

28 BEACHES

-7-,-.,c3- SATELLITE FINE SAND PROBABLE I MPROBABLE--700 SANDY-----

PAGE 2

TABLE 31: PROBABILITY OF FINDING AGGREGATES SUITABLE FOR USE

SOIL PROBABILITY REASON FOR PROBABILITY REASON FOR
NO. SOIL NAME FOR SAND IMPROBABILITY FOR GRAVEL I MrROBAB I L I'T Y

lo WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

31 FRIP-SPTELLITE COMPLEX PROBABLE I MPROBAL:LE TOO SANDY

'LOPE IMPROBAB_E
32 PA, h BEACH. SAND 0-5i. S PROBABLE TOO SANDY

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROF.,,AE:LE TDO ' SANDY

-34-TOCOI FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE 1-00 SANDY

35 HONTOON MUCK IMPROBABLE IMPROBABLE

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED PROBABLE TMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

38- P ITS

4o POTTSBURG FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE 'TOO SANDY

41 TOMOKA MUCK IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES IMpRClPAFjLE EXCESS FINES

--.----42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED IMPROBABi-E EXCESS PINES IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

44 SPARR FINE SPND C@-51/- SLOPE IMPROBABLE 7HIN LAYER IMPROBABLE -OD SANDY

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM PROBABLE IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND IMPROBABLE THIN LAYER IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED PROBABLE IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

--49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOOD,ED PROBABLE IMPROBABLE--- TOO SANDY

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUESTRATUM PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

51 ST AUSUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX PROBABLE IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

54. ASTATULA-UREHAN '-AND COMPLE.X PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

55 APENTS, 0-2% SLOPE

57 ADAMEVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

FINE-SAND DEPRESSIONAL PROBABLE IMPROBABLE--- EXCESS- FINES--

PAGE 3
7
TABLE 31; PROBABILITY OF FINDING AGGREGATES SUITABLE FOR USE

SOIL PROBABILITY REASON FOR- PROBABILITY REASON FOR
NO. SOIL NAME FOR SAND IMPROBABILITY FOR GRAVEL IMPROBABILITY

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

--63 PLACID FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND PROBABLE IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

7-66--TEIRRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES IMPROBABLE---EXCESS-FINES-

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES IMPROBABLE EXCESS FINES

68 WINDER FINE SAND PROBABLE PROBABLE

F,9*BAKERSVILLE MUCK PROBABLE IMPROBABLE TOO SANDY---

PAGE

TABLE 32'. RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES FOR SOILS AS A SOURCE OF TOPSOIL

SOIL SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME RATING RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES

I ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND c)-8'1 SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY W T 04 E S S

4 MYOKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL POOR -1-00 SANDY W ET N E S S

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

S TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND POOR Too SANDY WETNESS

ZOLFO FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY

:
OMIONA FINE SAND
3 PL POOR TOO SANDY WE T N s

_11. SMYRNA FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

12 DNA FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

13 S! JOHNS FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND POOR 'TOO SANDY

15 POMELLO :::INE SAND C-5% SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5V SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

16 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FLOODED POOR TOO SANDY W.'ETNESS

,9 POMPANO c7INE SAND POOR TOO SANDY -WETNESS

@@'l WABASSO FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

22 MANAIEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNEc3S

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR WETNESS EXCESS SALT

2 5 AFRKWrJull" IN- SANDY C."ill 7-REQUENTLY OODED POOR WETNESS

2'S SAM-SULP r--IUCK@ POOR EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS

27 Sl AUGUSTINE FINE L:4iND POUR TOO SANDY

LS BEACHES

T
Eg SATELLITE FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY

PAGE

TABLS@ 32: RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES FOR SOILS AS A _--@OURCE OF TOPSOIL

SOIL SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME RATING RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX POOR TOO SANDY

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

-1-00 SANDY
'3 JONA-11-HAN' FINE SAND PC 0 R

34 TOCOI FINE SAND POOR 1-00 SANDY WEI-NESS

35 HONTOON MUCK POOR EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS

TOO WETNESS
36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR SANDY

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

41 TOMOKA MUCK POOR EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS

-2-BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR THIN LAYER WETNESS

44 SPARR FINE, SANE, 0-5% SLOPE POOR TOO SANDY

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM POO R ;-00 SANDY

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND POOR 700 SANDY WETNESS

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR TOO SANDY -WETNESS EXCESS SALT

50 NARCOUSSEE FINE: SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM POOR -1-00 SANDY

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX POOR TOO SANDY

52 DURBIN MUCK w. REQUENTLY FLOODED POOR EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS EXCESS SALT

5,3- IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

5,@ LAND COMPLEX POOR TOO SANDY

55 ARENTS 0-2% 3i_0PE

57 ADAMSVILLE VAR:ANT FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

&I- RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIDNAL POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

P A G';'--

TABLE RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES FOR SOILS' AS A SOURCE OF TOPSOIL

SOIL SOIL
NO. SOIL NAME RATING RESTRICTIVE SOIL FEATURES

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND POOR T":);j SANDY WETNESS

63 PLACID FINE SAND POOR _rDO SANDY WE 7 t @'E S S

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND POOR TOO SANDY WETNESS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND 0 0 R TOO SANDY WETNESS

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR EXCESS HUMUS WEI-NESS

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEA_f FREQUENTLY FLOODED POOR EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS EXCESS SAL-1

68 WINDER FINE 'SAND POOR 1-00 SANDY WETNESS

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK POOR EXCESS HUMUS WETNESS

3/14/89 PAGE I

TABLE .3,31: EROSION CHARACTEPIS-11CS OF SOILS

SOIL RANGE OF WIND EROD1- K FACTOR T FACTOR
NO. SOIL NAME SOIL SLOPE BILITY GROUP (TONS/ACRE/YR) (TONS/AURE/YR)

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND 0 0.10 5

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE 8 0. 10 5

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND 0. A. 0 5

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 0 L E, 10 5

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 0 2 10 5

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 0 5 2 1() 5

7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND o 2 2 o.lo 5

----S ZOLFO FINE SAND 0 2 2 0. 10 5

9 POMONA FINE SAND 0 2 2 u.10 5

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND 0 21 L, 0. 10 5

ONA FINE SAND 2 2 0. 10 5

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND C) 2 2 1 c) 5

114 CASSIA FINE SAND o 2 2 1 5

POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 0 2 2 10 5

16 ORSINO FINE SAND o-5% SLOPE 0 5 2 o.lo 5

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENILY FLOODED 0 L 0. 1 c) 5

19 POMPANO FINE SAND 0 2 2 o. 1 5

al WABASSO FINE SAND 0 2 L 0. 10 5

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 2 3 0.1o 5

E3 PAOLA FINE SAND C)-B% SLOPE cl 9 1 cl. 10 5

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 1 4 0.32 5

5 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED L 3 0. 10 5

2 E SAMSULA MUCK 0 1 2 9999 99

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND 2 2 0. 10 5

28 BEACHES o 99 99 9999 99

2.9 SATELLITE FINE SAND 0 2 2 0. 10 5----

Pi-1, GE L

TABLE 33: EROSION CHARACTE7RISTICS OF SOILS

SOIL RANGE OF WIND ERODI- K FACTOR T FACTOR
NO. SOIL NAME SOIL SLOPE BILlTY GROUP (TONS/AC.RE/YR) (TONS/ACRE/YR)

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 2 2 0. 10 5

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX a ib 1 0. 10 5
i7_1 2 0. 10 5

3,2, PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE o 5 1 0. 10 5

33 JONATHAN FINE SAND a 2 o. lo 5

34 TOCOI FINE SAND C) 2 2 0.10 5

35 HONTOON MUCK 0 1 9999 99

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 1 2 0. 1 cl 4

38 PITS I a 99 9999 99

-i-r,)--P-OT7SPUPG -FINE- SAND 0 2 2 0. 10 5

41 TOMOKA MUCK 1 2 2 9999 99

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED a 2 9999 99

44 SPAIRR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE o 5 2 C). 1. 5

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM 2 2 0. 1 C) 5

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND 0 2 2 0.10 5

47-HOLOPIAW-FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED C) 2 2 0.10-- 5

46 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED o 2 2 0.10 5

4- 9 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED- 0 1 9 9 0. 10 5

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM o 2 0. 10 5

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 0 2 2 (). 10 5

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 0 1 99 9999 99

5 @' TMMOKALEE-URPAN LAND COMPLEX 0 2 2 0.10 5

54 ASTATULA-URBAN 'LAND COMPLEX 0 8 2 C). I () 5

5 ff. ARIENTS 0-2% SLOPE 0 2 99 3999 99

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND 0 2 2 0.10 5

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND 0 2 2 0. 10 5

-INE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 2 4
F, I RIVIERA F 2 0.10

PPIGE

TABLE 33: EROSION CHARACTERISTICS DF SOILS

SOIL RANGE OF WIND ERODI- K FACTOR T FACTOR
NO. SOIL NAME SOIL SLOPE BILITY GROUP (TONS/ACRE/YR) (TONS/ACRE/YR)

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND 0
2: 0. 1 C.1 5

63 PLACID FINE SAND 0 2 2 ("'. 1 C) 5

64 ELL-ZEY FINE SAND 0 iR 2, 0. 10 5

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND 2 2 0 A.+

F, 6 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED c) 1 2 9 r9 9 9 99

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED C) i 2 9999 5

68 WINDER FINE SAND 0 2 2 (). Io 5

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK 2 93 9999 919

A C, E

TABLE 34- ANIMALS THAi MAY OCCUR IN ST jOHNS C-OUNTY WHO ARE LiSTED BY THE USI:--WS OR FGFWFC

FGFWFC USFWE;
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL SCIENTIFIC NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STAIUS OCCURS IN SJC

ALLIGATOR SNAPP,NG TURTLE MACROCLEMYS TEMMINCKI SSC UR

AMERICAN ALLIGATOR ALLIGATOR MISSISSIPPIENSIS SSC T(S/A) Sic

AMERICAN CROCODILE CROCODYLUS ACUTUS E E

AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHER HAEMATOPUS PALLIATUS ssc Sic

ANASTASIA BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS PHASMA UR Sic

ANASTASIA ISLAND COTTON MOUSE PEROMYSCUS GOSSYPINUS ANASTASAE UR sic

ANASTASIA ISLAND MOLE SCALOPUS AQUATICUS ANASTASAE UR sic

ARCTIC PEREGRINE FALCON FALCO PEREGRINUS TUNDRIUS E T MIGRATES THRU

ATLANTIC GREEN TURTLE CHELONIA MYDAS MYDAS E E Sic

ATLANTIC HAWKSBILL TURTLE ERETMOCHELYS iMBRICATA IMBRICATA E E

ATLANTIC LEATHERBACK TURTLE DERMOCHELYS CORIACEA E E OCCASSIONALLY

ATLANTIC LOGGERHEAD TURTL.E CARETTA CARETTA CARETTA T T sic

ATLAN71C RIDLEY TUR-''L..E LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPI E

ATLANTIC SALT MARSH WATER SNAKE NERODIA FASCIATA TPENIATA T T

ATLANTIC STURGEON ACI@:,[email protected].@--@"IXYRHYNCHUS ssc UR

BACHMAN' S SPARROW AIMOPHILA AESI . IVALIS U R

BACHMAN'S WARBLER VERMIVORA BACHMANII E E

BALD EAGLE HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS T E sic

PARBOURIS MAD TURTLE GRAPTEMYS BARBOURI SSC UR

BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS ALLOPHRYS E E

PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS DECOLORATUS E UR

PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS -EUCOCEPHALUS U R

PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS NIVEIVENIRIS U R

PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS PEP-JINSULARIS UR

PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS PHASMA UR sic

PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS TRISSYLLEPSIS- E

PAGE 2

TABLE 34: ANIMALS THAT MAY OCCUR IN ST JOHNS COUNTY WHO ARE LISTED BY 'THE USFWS OR FGFWFC

FGFWFC USFWS
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL SCIENTIFIC NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS OCCURS IN Sic

BIB CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL SCIURUS NIGER AVICENNIA T UR

BIG PINE KEY RINGNECK SNAKE DIADOPHIS PUNCTATUS ACRICUS .1. UR

BLACK BEAR URSUS AMERICANUS FLORIDANUS T UR sic

BLACKMOUTH SHINER NI:)TROPIS sp. (UNDESCRIBED) E UR

BLUE-IAILED MOLE SKINK EUMECES EGREGIUS LIVIDUS T T

BLUESTRIPE SHINER NOTROPIS CALLITAENIA Ssc UR

BOO FROG RANA OKALOOSAE ssc

BROWN PELICAN PELECANUS OCCIDENTALIS ssc sic-

DURROWING OWL ATHENE CUNICULARIA _SSC

CAPE SABLE SEASIDE SPARROW AMMODRAMU3 MARITIMUS MIRABILIS E E

CHADWICK BEACH COTTON MOUSE PEROMYSCUS GOSSYPINUS RESTRICTUS E UR

CHOCTAWHATCHEE BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS ALLOPHRYS E E

CLAPPER RAIL RALLUS LONGIROSTRIS !NSULARUM U R

COMMON SNOOK CENTROPOMUS UNDECIMALIS ssc

CORN SNAKE ELAPHE GUTTATA GUTTATA Ssc

COTTON MOUSE PEROMYSCUS GOSSYPINUS ALLAPATICOLA E E

PERDMYSQUS GOSSYPINUS ANASTASAE UR .9JC

PERDMYSCUS GOSSYPINUS RESTRICTUS E UR

COTTON RAT SIGMODON HISPIDUS EXSPUTUS UR

SIGMODON HISPIDUS INSULICOLA UR

SIGMODON HISPIDUS LITTORALIS UR

CRESTED CA R f 1C A R A POLYBORUS PLANCUS T T

CRYSTAL DARTER AMMDCRYPTA ASPRELLA T U R

DUKEI S SAL TMARSH VOLE MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS DUKECAMPBELLI- S: 3 C UR---

DUSKY SEASIDE SPARROW AMMDDRAMUS MARITIMUS NIGRISCENS E E

'DWARF- 3 1 REN-- PSEUDOBRANCHUS STRIATUS LUSTRICOLUS ---

14 8 13 PAGE

TABLE 34: ANIMALS THPT MAY OCCUR IN S7_ JOHNS COUNTY WHO ARE LISTED BY THE US'@WS OR FG;@'WFC

FGFWFC USFWS
SCTENFIFIC NAME OF ANIMAL
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS OCCURS IN SJC

EASTERN CHIPMUNK 7AMIAS STRI@iTUS SSC

EASTERN COTTONTAIL RABBIT SYLVILAGUS FLORIDANUS ArIMOPHITLUS UR

EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE DRYMARCHON CORAIS COUPERI. T T sic

EASTERN WOOD RAT NEO7OMA FLORIDANA SMALL" E E

ENGLEWOOD MOLE SCALOPUS AQUATICUS BASSI UR

EVERGLADES MINK MUSTELA VISON EVERGLADENSIS T UR

FINBACK WHALE BALAENOPTERA PHYSALUS E E

FLATWOODS SALAMANDER AMBYSTOMA CINGULATUM UR

FLORIDA BLACK BEAR URSUS AMERICANUS FLORIDANUS T U R sic

FLORIDA BROWN SNAKE STORERIA DEKAYI VICTA T

FLORIDA GOPHER FROG RANA AREOLAIA AESOPUS SSC UR sic

FLORIDA GRASSHJPPEF. SPARROW AMMODRAMUS SAVANNARUM. F:_OR 7 DANUS E E

FLORIDA KEYS MOLE SKINK LUMECES EGREGIUS EGREGIUS SSC UR

FLORIDA LONG-TAILED WEASEL MUSTELA FRENATA PENINSULAE UR

FLORIDA MASTIFF BAT EUMOPS GLAUCINUS FLORIDANUS UR

FLORIDA MINK MUSTALA VISON LUTENSIS UR

FLORIDA MOUSE- PEROMYSCUS FLORIDANUS ssc UR

FLORIDA PANTHER FELIS CONCOLOR CORYI E E sic

FLORIDA PINE SNAKE PITUOPHlS MELANOLEUCUS MUGITUS ssc UR sic

FLORIDA RIBBON SNAKE THAMNOPHIS SAURITUS SACKENI T

FLORIDA SANDHILL CRANE GRUS CANADENSIS PRATENSIS T sic

FLORIDA SCRUB JAY APHELOCOMA COERULESCENG COERULESCE4,1S T T 313 C

FLORIDA SCRUB LIZARD SCELOPORUS WOODI UR

FLOR,lDA__ WAT -ER f.RAT NEOFIBER ALLENI UR

FOX SQUIRREL SCIURUS NIGER AVICENNlA T UR

SCIURUS NIGER SHERMANI____ SSC -UR--SJC------

3/ 1 -4/
PAGE 4

I-ABLE 34: ANIMALS THAT MAY OCCUR IN ST jO,,Ii-4*-- COUt@Tle WHO ARE LISTED BY THE USFWS OF'-" F*GFWFC

FGFWFC USFWS
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL SCIENTIFIC NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS OCCURS IN SJC

GEORGIA BLIND SALAMANDER HAIDEOTRITON WALLACEI SEC UR

POCKET GOPHER GEOMYS PINETIS GOFFI E UR

GOPHER FROG RANA AREOLATA AErESDPUS alisc UR L;jc

GOPHL:_.R TORTOISE GOPHERUS POLYPHEMUS SEC UR slic

GRAY MYOTIS GRISESCENS E E
BAT--

GULF HAMMOCK DWARF SIREN PSEUDOBRANCHUS STRIATUS LUSTRICOLUS UR

HARLEQUIN DARTER ETHEOSTOMA HISIRIO SEC

--HOMOSASSA SHREW SOREX LONGIROSTRIS EIONIS SSC UR-

HUMPBACK WHALE IMEGAPTERA NOVAEANGLIAE E E

INDIANA BAT MYOTIS SODALIS E E

INSULAR COTTON RAT SIGMDDON HISPIDUS INSLJLlCOL_A U R

IVORY-BILLED WOODPECKER CAMPEPHILUS PRINCIPALIS E E

KEY BLENNY STARKSIA SIARCKI Sso

KEY DEER ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS CLAVIUM E E

KEY LARGO COTTON MOUSE PEROMYSCUS GOSSYPINUS ALLAPATICOLA E E

KEY LARGO WOODRAT NEOTOMA FLORIDANA SMALLI E E

KEY SILVERSIDE MENIDIA CONCHORUM T

KEY VACA RACCOON PROCYON LOTOR AUSPICATUS UR

KEY WEST RACCOON PROCYON LOTOR lNCANTUS UR

MT
KIRTLAND'S WARBLER DENDROICA KIRTLANDII E E IGRATES THRU

LAKE EUSTIS PUPPISH CYPRINODON VARIEGATUS HUDESI SSC

LEAS T TERN STERNA ANTILLARUN, T Slic,

IMPKIN ARAMUS GUARAUNA SEX sic

LITTLE BLUE HERON EGRETTA CAERULEA SEC sic

LITTLE KESTREL FALCO SPARVERIUS PAULUS T UR

@7 LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE-- LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS MIGRANS UR-------

2 4/69 PAGE 5

I@AB@E ---,+: ANIMALS THAT MA'y OCCUR IN ST jOHNIS COUNTY WHO ARE LISTED BY THE USFWS OR FGFWFC

FGFWFC USFWS
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL SCIENTIFIC NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS OCCURS IN Sic

LOUISANA HERON TRICOLOR ssc sic

LOWER KEYS COTTON FAT SIGMGDON HISPIDUS EXSPUTUS UR

LOWER KEYS RABBIT SYLVILAGUS PALUSTRIS HEFNER1 UR

MANGROVE CLAPPER FRAIL RALLUS LONGTROSTRIS INSULARUM UR

-.-MARIAN'S MARSH WREN CISTOTHORUS PALUSTRIS MARIANAE SSC

MARSH RABBIT SYLVILAGUS PALusTRIS HEFNER! UR

MIAl"ill BLACK--HEADED SNAKE TANTILLA OOLITICA -1 UR

7- MICCO COTTON RAT SIGMDDON HISPIDUS LIT' 1. ORALIS UR

MICCO COTTONTAIL RABBIT SYLVILAGUS FLORIDANUS AMMOPHILUS UR

MIGRANT LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS MIGRANS UR

MINK MUSTELA VISON EVERGLPDENSIS T UR

OKALOOSA DARTER ETHEOSTOMA OKALOOSAE E E

PALLID BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS 1DOLIONOTUS DECOLORATUS E UR

PERDIDO KEY BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS TRISSYLLEPSIS E E

PEREGRINE FALCON FALCO PEREGRINUS TUNDRIUS E T MIGRATES THRU

P, 1 NE BARRENS TREEFROG HYLA ANDERSONII ssc

P INE ISLA,ND RICE RAT ORYZOMYS PALUSTRIS PLANIROSTRIS UR

PIPING PLOVER CHARADRIUS MELODUS T T WINTERTIME

RACCOON PROCYON LOTOR AUSPICATUS UR

PROCYON LOTOR INCANTUS UR

RED RAT SNAKE ELAPHE GUTTATA GUTTATA ssc

WOCIDPECKER 'PICOIDES BOREALIS T E SiC

RZIDDI-SH EGRET EGRETTA RUFESCENS Ssc UR

FIGHT WHALE BALAENA GLACIALIS E E

RIMRDCK CROWNED SNAKE TANTILLA DOLITICA T UR

____-RIVULUS_ RIVULUS MARMORATUS SSC_

AGE

TABLE 34: ANIMAL-S THAT MAY OCCUR IN ST JOIHNS COUNTY WHO AR: LIETED BY THE USFW'S OR' FGFWFC

FG;:7WF:C USFWS
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL SCIENITIFIC NAME OF ANIM-AL_
STATUS STATUS OCCURS IN SJC

ROSEATE SPOONDILL AJAIP) Pjj',jJA SEC

ROSEATE I-ERN STERNA DOUGALLI!

ROUND-TAILED MUSIKRAT NEOFIBER PLLENI UR

SALTMARSH TOPMINNOW FUINDULUS JENKINSSI SEC

SAND SK INK NEOSEPIS REYNOLDS! T T

SANDHILL CRANE GRUS CANADENSIS PRATENSTS T sic

SANIE.'EL ISLAND RICE RAT OPYZOMYS PALUSTRIS SANIBELI SEC UR

7-----SANTA ROSA BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS LEUCOCEPHALUS UR,

SCO'T'S SEASIDE SPARROW AmMOURAMUS MARITIMUS PENIN-EULAE SEC

SCRUB JAY APHELOCOMA COERULESCENS COERULESCENS T T sic

SEI WHALE BAL.AENOPTERA BOREALIS E E

SHERMAN'S FOX SQUIRREL SCIURUS NIGER SHERMAN! S S C UR sic

SHERMAN', S SHORT-7AILED S HR E W BLAFRINA CAPOLINENSIS SHERMnNI SEC UR

SHOAL BASS MICROPrEROUS sp.(UNOESCRIDED) SEC

SHORT-TAILED SNAKE STILOSOMA EXTENUATUM T UR

SHORTNOSE STURGEON E sic
ACIPENSER BREVIROSTRUM E

SILVER RICE RAT ORYZOMYS ARGENTATUS E U R

SMYRNA SEASIDE SPARROW AMMODRAMUS MARITIMUS PELONOTUS UR

SNAIL KITE ROSIF. RHIAMUS SOCIABILTS E E

SNOWY EGRET EGRETTA THULA SEC sic

souTHEAST BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POL10NOTUS NIVEIVENTRIS UR

SOUTHEASTERN BAT MYOTIS AUSTRORIPARIUS U R

SOUTHEASTERN BTG-EAREP BAT PLECOTUS RAFINESQUII li R

301UTHEASTERN VESTRE-L FALCO SPARVERIUS PAULUS T UP,

SOUTHEASTERN POCKET GOPHER GEOMYS PINETIS GOFFI E UR

SOUTHEASTERN SHREW SOREX LONGIROSTRIS EIDNIS SEC UR

T,AGE 7

TABLE 34: ANIMAL-3 THAT MAY OCCUR IN ST JOHNS COUNTY WHO ARE LISTED BY 'THE USFWS OR FGFWFC

FG=WFC USFWS
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL SCIENTIFIC NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS OCCURS IN Sic

SOUTHEASTERN SNOWY PLOVER C"ARADFRIUS ALEXANDRINUS TE-NUIROSTRIS T UN,

SOUTHERN BALD EAGLE HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS T E sic

SOUTHERN RlNG-NECKED SNA@'E DIADOPHIS PUNCTATUS ACRICUS T UR

SOUTHERN TESSELLATED DARTER ETHEOSTOIMA OLrISTEDI MACULATICEPS SSC

SPERM WHALE PHYSTER CATODON E E

ST. ANDREWS BEACH MOUSE PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS PENINSULARIS UR

STODDARD'S YELLOW-THROATED WARBLER DENDROICA DOMINICA STODDARDI UR

7-STRIPED MUD TURTLE KINOSTERNON BAURI E UR

SUWANNEE BASS MICROPTERUS NOTIUS E J S, c

SUWANNEE COOTER CHRYSEMYS CONCINNA SUWANNIES75 SSC UR

HAWK- BLITEO c@WAINSONI UR

SWALLOW-TAILED KITE ELANOIDES FORFICATUS UR

TRICOLORED HERON EGRETTA TRICOLOR SSC sic

WAKULLA SEASIDE SPARROW AMMODRAMUS MARITIMUS JUNCICOLUS ssc UR

WEST INDIAN MANATEE TRICHECHUS MANATUS LATIROSTRIS E E sic

WHITE TAIL DEER ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS CLAVIUM E E

WHITE-CROWNED PIGEON COLUMIBA LXUCOCEPHALA T UR

WOOD STORK MYCTERIA AMERICANA E E sic

WOR'THING'TONIS MARbH WREN GISTOTHORUS PALUSTRIS GRISEUS SSC sic

YELLOW-THROATED WARBLER DENDROICA DOMINICA STODDARD! UR

PAGE

TABLE 35: ECOLOGICAL COMMIUNITIES IN ST jOHNS COUNTY

NUMBER NAME

1 NORTH FLA COAS7AL STRAND

3 SAND PINE SCRUB

4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS

F, SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS

8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS

11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

12- WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS

15 OAK HAMMOCKS

CYPRESS SWAMP

18 SALT MARSH

21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS

SHRUB BOG

Ls FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

26 SLOUGH

3/14/89 PAGE 1

TABLE 36: THOSE SOILS WHICH MAY SUPPORT THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

EC SOIL
NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME NO. SOIL NAME

1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND 28 BEACHES
31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX
32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE

3 SAND PINE SCRUB 2 ASTATI;A FOME SAMD 0-8% SLOPE
14 CASSIA FINE SAND
15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE
16 ORSINO FINE SAND 6-5% SLOPE
23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE
29 SATELLITE FINE SAND
31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX
33 JONATHAN FINE SAND
54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS 2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE
6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE
54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX

6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS 1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND
3 MYAKKA FINE SAND
4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND
9 POMONA FINE SAND
11 SMYRNA FINE SAND
12 DNA FINE SAND
13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND
14 CASSIA FINE SAND
19 POMPANO FINE SAND
21 WABASSO FINE SAND
34 TOCOI FINE SAND
50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM
53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX
57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND
58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND
64 ELLZEY FINE SAND

7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS 40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND

8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS 36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
65 RIVIERA FINE SAND

11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS 1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND
8 ZOLFO FINE SAND
44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE
57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND

12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS 19 POMPANO FINE SAND
21 WABASSO FINE SAND
25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND
47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

3/14/89 PAGE 2

TABLE 36: THOSE SOILS WHICH MAY SUPPORT THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

EC SOIL
NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME NO. SOIL NAME

12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS 48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
65 RIVIERA FINE SAND
68 WINDER FINE SAND

13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS 25 PARKWO0D FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
68 WINDER FINE SAND

15 OAK HAMMOCKS 1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND
6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE
8 ZOLFO FINE SAND
25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY SUBSTRATUM
57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND

17 CYPRESS SWAMP 18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
26 SAMSULA MUCK
61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND
63 PLACID FINE SAND

18 SALT MARSH 24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED
67 ISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED

21 SWAMP HARDWOODS 18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
26 SAMSULA MUCK
30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
35 HONTOON MUCK
41 TOMOKA MUCK
42 BLUFF SAND CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND
63 PLACID FINE SAND
66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED
69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK

22 SHRUB BOO 26 SAMSULA MUCK
35 H0NT00N MUCK

25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS 4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
26 SAMSULA MUCK
35 FIONTOON MUCK
41 TOMOKA MUCK
42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED
61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL
62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND

3/14/89 PAGE 3

TABLE 36: THOSE SOILS WHICH MAY SUPPORT THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

EC SOIL
NO. ECOLOCICAL COMMUNITY NAME NO. SOIL NAME

25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS 63 PLACID FINE SAND
66 TERRE CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED

26 SLOUGH 19 POMPANO FINE SAND
21 WABASSO FINE SAND
36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND
47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
63 PLACID FINE SAND
65 RIVIERA FINE SAND
68 WINDER FINE SAND

99 MAN MADE 27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND
38 PITS
45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM
51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX
55 ARENTS

PAGE

TABLE 37: THOSE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE SOIL UNITS OF ST JOHNS COUNTY

SOIL EC
NO. SOIL NAME NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME

1 ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
ll UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

2 ASTATULA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS

3 MYAKKA FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

4 MYAKKA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

5 ST JOHNS FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

6 TAVARES FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

7 IMOKALEE FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

8 ZOLFO FINE SAND 11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

9 POMONA FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

11 SMYRNA FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

12 ONA FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

13 ST JOHNS FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

14 CASSIA FINE SAND 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

15 POMELLO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 3 SAND PINE SCRUB

16 ORSINO FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 3 SAND PINE SCRUB

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

19 POMPANO FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

21 WABASSO FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

PAGE
03/13/89
PAGE 2
TABLE 37: THOSE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE SOIL UNITS OF ST JOHNS COUNTY
SOIL EC
NO. SOIL NAME NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME

23 PAOLA FINE SAND 0-8% SLOPE 3 SAND PINE SCRUB

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 18 SALT MARSH

25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

26 SAMSULA MUCK 17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB DOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND 99 MAN MADE

28 BEACHES NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

29 SATELLITE FINE SAND 3 SAND PINE SCRUB

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS

31 FRIP-SATELLITE COMPLEX 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB

32 PALM BEACH SAND 0-5% SLOPE 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

33- JONATHAN F I NE SAND 3 SAND PINE SCRUB

34 TOCOI FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLATLTWOODS

35 HONTOON MUCK 21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

36 PITS 99 EXCAVATIONS

40 POTTSBURG FINE SAND 7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS

41 TAMOKA MUCK 21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY ENTLY FLOODED 21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
FREASHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

44 SPARR FINE SAND 0-5% SLOPE 25 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

45 ST AUBUSTINE FINE SAND CLAVEY SUBSTRATUM 99 MAN MADE

PAGE 3
3/13/89

TABLE 37: THOSE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE SOIL UNITS OF ST JOHNS

SOIL EC
NO. SOIL NAME NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME

46 HOLOPAW FINE SAND 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED 18 SALT MARSH

50 NARCOOSSEE FINE SAND SHELLY BUBSTRATUM 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 99 MAN MADE

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 18 SALT MARSH

53 IMMOKALEE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

54 ASTATULA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS

53 ARENTS 99 HETERDGENEOUS FILL MATERIAL

57 ADAMSVILLE VARIANT FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

58 EAUGALLIE FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

61 RIVIERA FINE SAND DEPRESSIONAL 17 CYPRESS SWAMP,
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 'FRESHWATER MARSH 'AND PONDS

62 FLORIDANA FINE SAND 17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

63 PLACID FINE SAND 17 CYPRESS SWAMP,
SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH, AND PONDS
17 SLOUGH

64 ELLZEY FINE SAND 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS

65 RIVIERA FINE SAND 8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUCH

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 21 SWAMP HARDWOODS

3/13/89 PAGE 4

TABLE 37: THOSE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE SOIL UNITS OF ST JOHNS COUNTY

SOIL Ec
NO. SOIL NAME NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED 18 SALT MARSH

68 WINDER FINE SAND 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
26 SLOUGH

69 BAKERSVILLE MUCK 21 SWAMP HARDWOODS

3/13/89

PAGE 1
TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE UR SSC

AMERICAN CROCODILE E E

ARTIC PEREGRINE FALCON T E I NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
18 SALT MARSH
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

ATLANTIC HAWKSBILL TURTLE E E

ATLANTIC LEATHERBACK TURTLE E E 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

ATLANTIC RIDLEY TURTLE E E 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

ATLANTIC SALT MARSH WATER SNAKE 7 T

ATLANTIC STURGEON- UR SSC

BACHMAN'S SPARROW UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB YES
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES,
6 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

BACHMAN'S WARBLER E E

BARBOUR'S MAP TURTLE UR SSC

BEACH MOUSE E E
1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL UR T 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS YES
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 WORTH FLA FLATWOODS

BIG PINE KEY RINGNECK SNAKE UR T 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOG

3/1/89
PAGE 2
TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING -IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

BLACKMOUTH SHINER UR E

BLUE-TAILED MOLE SKINK T T

BLUESTRIPE SHINER UR SSC

BOG FROG SSC

BURROWING OWL'- SSC

CAPE SABLE SEASIDE SPARROW E E

CHADWICK BEACH COTTON MOUSE UR E 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
-WOODS
6 SOUTH FLA FLAI YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES-
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS-
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS

CHOCTAWHATCHEE BEACH MOUSE E E

CLAPPER RAIL UR 18 SALT MARSH YES

COMMON.SNOOK SSC

CORN SNAKE SSC 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOODS HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

COTTON MOUSE E E 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES----
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS

PAAGE 3
TABLE 36 ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED By USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

COTTON MOUSE UR E 21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS

COTTON RAT UR 4 LONGLEAF PINE--TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
26 SLOUGH
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES-
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
26 SLOUGH
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
26 SLOUGH

CRESTED CARACARA T T

CRYSTAL DARTER-
UR T

DUKE' S SALTMARSH VOLE UR SSC

DUSKY SEASIDE SPARROW E

DWARF SIREN UR 17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

EASTERN1 CHIPMUNK SSC

EASTERN COTTONTAIL RABBIT UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

PAGE 4

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY USFWS OR GFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

PASTERN COTTONTAIL RABBIT UR 13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
18 SALT MARSH

EASTERN WOOD RAT E E 11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

ENGLEWOOD MOLE UR

EVERGLADES MINK UR T 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP YES
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS YES
22 SHRUB BOO
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS ----YES------
26 SLOUGH YES

FINBACK- WHALE-------- E E

FLATWOODS SALAMANDER UR

FLORIDA BROWN SNAKE T 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS--
26 SLOUGH

FLORIDA GRASSHOPPER SPARROW- E E

FLORIDA KEYS MOLE SKINK UR ssc

FLORIDA LONG-TAILED WEASEL UR

FLORIDA MASTIFF BAT UR

FLORIDA MINK UR

FLORIDA MOUSE UR SSC 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS YES

FLORIDA RIBBON SNAKE T 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

PAGE 5

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS PGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

FLORIDA RIBBON SNAKE T 13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

FLORIDA SCRUB LIZARD UR

FLORIDA WATER RAT UR 25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS YES

FOX SQUIRREL UR T 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS YES
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS

GEORGIA BLIND SALAMANDER UR ssc

GOPHER UR E

GRAY BAT E E

GULF HAMMOCK DWARF SIREN UR 17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

HARLEQUIN DARTER ssc

HOMOSASSA SHREW UR ssc 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS

HUMPBACK WHALE E E

INDIANA BAT E

INSULAR COTTON RAT UR 4 LONGLEAF PINE--TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
13 SWAMP HARDWOODS
26 SLOUGH

IVORY-BILLED WOODPECKER E E 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS-

KEY BLENNY ssc

KEY DEER E E I NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

3/13/89 PAGE 6

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY OSFWB OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUE STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

KEY DEER E E 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONG LEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

KEY LARGO COTTON MOUSE E E 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS

KEY LARGO WOODRAT E E 11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS

KEY SILVERSIDE T

KEY VACA RACCOON UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD MANNOCKS YES
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP YES
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS YES
22 SHRUB BOB
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

KEY WEST RACCOON UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS

3/13/89 PAGE 7

TABLE 3: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

KEY WEST RACCOON UR 8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WEILAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
5 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP, YES
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS YES
22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

KIRTLAND'S WARBLER E E

LAKE EUSTIS PUPFISH SSC

LITTLE KESTREL UR T 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOG
26 SLOUGH YES

LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

LOWER KEYS COTTON RAT UR 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
26 SLOUGH

3/13/89 PAGE 8

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY UFW OR FGFWF AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

LOWER KEYS RABBIT UR 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCK'S
18 SALT MARSH
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS YES
26 SLOUGH YES

MANGROVE CLAPPER RAIL UR 18 SALT MARSH YES

MARIAN'S MARSH WREN SSC

MARSH RABBIT UR 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
18 SALT MARSH
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS YES
26 SLOUGH YES

MIAMI BLACK-HEADED SNAKE UR T

MICCO COTTON RAT UR 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
26 SLOUGH

MICCO COTTONTAIL RABBIT UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
18 SALT MARSH

MIGRANT LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB YES
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

MINK UR T 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP YES

3/13/89 PAGE 9

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

MINK UR T 18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS YES
22 SHRUB DOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS YES
26 SLOUGH YES

OKALOOSA DARTER E E

PALLID BEACH MOUSE UR E 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

PERDIDO KEY BEACH MOUSE E E 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

PEREGRINE FALCON T E 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
18 SALT MARSH
23 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

PINE BARRENS TREEFROG SSC

PINE ISLAND RICE RAT UR

PIPING PLOVER T T

RACCOON UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP YES
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP' HARDWOODS YES
22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH
1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTIH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP' YES
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS YES

3/13/89 PAGE 10

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY UFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

RACCOON UR 22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

RED RAT SNAKE SSC 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS YES
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

REDDISH EGRET UR SSC

RIGHT WHALE E E

RIMROCK CROWNED SNAKE UR T

RIVULUS ssc

ROSEATE SPOONBILL SSC

ROSEATE TERN

ROUND-TAILED MUSKRAT UR 25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS YES--

SALTMARSH TOPMINNOW ssc

SAND SKINK T T 3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS

SANIBEL ISLAND RICE RAT UR SSC

SANTA ROSA BEACH MOUSE UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

SCOTT'S SEASIDE SPARROW SSC

SEI WHALE E E

SHERMAN'S SHORT-TAILED SHREW UR SSC

SHOAL BASS SSC

SHORT-TAILED SNAKE UR T 3 SAND PINE SCRUB YES
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS

SILVER RICE RAT UR E

SMYRNA SEASIDE SPARROW UR

3/13/89 PAGE 11

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED USFWS OR FGFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC
CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

SNAIL KITE E E

SOUTHEAST BEACH MOUSE UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

SOUTHEASTERN BAT UR

SOUTHEASTERN BIG--EARED BAT UR

SOUTHEASTERN KESTREL UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE--TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS YES
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOO
26 SLOUGH YES

SOUTHEASTERN POCKET GOPHER UR E

SOUTHEASTERN SHREW UR ssc 12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP,
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS

SOUTHEASTERN SNOWY PLOVER UR T

SOUTHERN RING-NECKED SNAKE UR T 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWDODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOO

SOUTHERN TESSELLATED DARTER SSC

SPERM WHALE E E

ST.ANDREWS BEACH MOUSE UR 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND

STODDARD'S YELLOW-THROATED WARBLER UR 4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP'
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS

3/13/89 PAGE 12

TABLE 38: ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY OF ANIMALS LISTED BY UFWS OR FFWFC AND OCCURRING IN ST JOHNS COUNTY

USFWS FGFWFC EC CHARACTERISTIC
COMMON NAME OF ANIMAL STATUS STATUS NO. ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY NAME OF COMMUNITY

STRIPED MUD TURTLE UR E 17 CYPRESS SWAMP
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS

SUWANNEE BASS SSC

SUWANNEE COOTER UR SSC

SWAINSON'S HAWK UR

SWALLOW-TAILED KITE UR 6 SOUTH FLA FLATWDODS YES
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS YES
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

WAKULLA SEASIDE SPARROW UR SSC

WHITE TAIL DEER E E 1 NORTH FLA COASTAL STRAND
3 SAND PINE SCRUB
4 LONGLEAF PINE-TURKEY OAK HILLS
6 SOUTH FLA FLATWOODS
7 NORTH FLA FLATWOODS
8 CABBAGE PALM FLATWOODS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
13 CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP,
18 SALT MARSH
21 SWAMP, HARDWOODS
22 SHRUB BOG
25 FRESHWATER MARSH AND PONDS
26 SLOUGH

WHITE-CROWNED PIGEON UR T

YELLOW-THROATED WARBLER UR 4 LONGLEAF PINE--TURKEY OAK HILLS
11 UPLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
12 WETLAND HARDWOOD HAMMOCKS
15 OAK HAMMOCKS
17 CYPRESS SWAMP,
21 SWAMP HARDWOODS

3/13/89 PAGE 1

TABLE 39: SOILS CHARACTERISTIC OF FLOODING

SOIL FLOODING FLOODING PROBABLE
NUMBER SOIL NAME FREQUENCY DURATION MONTHS

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY LONG JUL SEP

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY LONG JUN FED

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY LONG, JAN DEC

25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT BRIEF JUL Nov
FREQUENT LONG JUL NOV
FREQUENT VERY LONG JUL NOV
FREQUENT BRIEF JUL NOV
FREQUENT LONG JUL NOV
FREQUENT VERY LONG JUL NOV

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND RARE - - - - - -

FREQUENT VERY LONG JUN - FEB
30 WESCONNET1 FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED
FREQUENT BRIEF JUL - OCT
FREQUENT BRIEF JUL - OCT

42 BLUFF-SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT LONG JUN - NOV

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM RARE

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY LONG JUN FEB

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT LONG JUL OCT
FREQUENT LONG JUL OCT

49 MOULTRIE-FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY L0NG JAN DEC

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX RARE

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY LONG JAN DEC

66 TERRA CEIA MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT LONG JUN - NOV
FREQUENT LONG JUN - NOV

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED FREQUENT VERY LONG JAN - DEC

3/14/89 PAGE I

TABLE 40: SOILS WITH FLOODING LIMITATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS WITH AND WITHOUT BASEMENTS

SOIL WITHOUT BASEMENT WITH BASEMENT
NUMBER SOIL NAME LIMITATION IS DUE TO LIMITATION IS DUE TO

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

22 MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

27 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

SO WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE- FLOODING

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

49 MOULTRIE FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

51 ST AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

52 DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING SEVERE FLOODING

3/14/89 PAGE

TABLE 41: SOILS WITH FLOODING LImITATIONS FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL CITES

SOIL
NUMBER SOIL NAME LIMITATION IS DUE TO

18 FLORIDANA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

22- MANATEE FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

24 PELLICER SILTY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

25 PARKWOOD FINE SANDY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

@--27-ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND SEVERE FLOODING

30 WESCONNETT FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

36 RIVIERA FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

42 BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

45 ST AUGUSTINE FINE SAND CLAYEY SUBSTRATUM SEVERE FLOODING

47 HOLOPAW FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

48 WINDER FINE SAND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

45 MOUL7RIE FINE SPND FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

51 31' AUGUSTINE-URBAN LAND COMPLEX SEVERE FLOODING

5a DURBIN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

67 TISONIA MUCKY PEAT FREQUENTLY FLOODED SEVERE FLOODING

L 3

3/14/89 PAGE I

TABLE 42: DESCRIPTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS (STP)

STP CAPACITY
NUMBER STP NAME CATEGORY POPULATION (gpd)

1 MCDANIELS SLUDGE DISPOSAL AREA SEPTIC: TANK 0 0

2 SPANISH TRAIL MOBILE HUME PARK PACKAGE STP 75 13,000

3 LUI-M CORPORATION PACKAGE STP 175 2,500

4 MOULTRIE LAKES APARTMENTS PACKAGE STP 250 30,000

5 SALT & SAND CAR WASH PACKAGE STP 0 400

6 PONCE DELEON CARE CENTER PACKAGE STP 120 12,000

7 MOULTRIE APARTMENTS PACKAGE STP 120 12,000

8 JACK WILSON CAR WASH PACKAGE STP 0 1,500

9 SOUTHGATE MOBILE HOME PARK PACKAGE STP 30 4,000

10 WAGON WHEEL MOBILE HOME PARK PACKAGE SIP 0 4,200

11 BURNEY'S SLUDGE DISPOSAL AREA SEPTIC TANK 0 0

12 CITY OF ST AUGUSTINE SLUDGE DISPOSAL AREA SEPTIC TANK 0 0

13 MOULTRIE WOODS PACKAGE STP 0 24,000

14 WILDWOOD APARTMENTS PACKAGE STP 180 20,000

15 MOULTRIE OAKS PARK PACKAGE STP 93 42,500

16 MERIDIAN NURSING HOME PACKAGE STP 0 15,000

17 ST-AUGUSTINE SHORES STP 6,000 500,000

18 ST AUGUSTINE CENTER FOR LIVING PACKAGE STP 75 7,500

19 VAW STP 0 105,000

20 CITY OF ST AUGUSTINE #1 STP 15,700 5000000

21 CITY OF ST AUGUSTINE #2 STP 15,000 1500000

22 ANASTASIA SANITARY DISTRICT STP 11,100 2000000

23 VAW PACKAGE STP 55 6,000

3/14/89 PAGE 1

TABLE 43: AREAS WITH HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC TANKS

MAP, NUMBER NAME OF AREA

1 GREEN ACRES

2 DEER RUN ROAD

3 GLIMPSE OF GLORY

4 POWELL ROAD

5 CENTURY HILLS

6 ST AUGUSTINE SOUTH

7 ST AUGUSTINE HEIGHTS

8 PRAIRIE CREEK

9 WILDWOOD CREEK

3/14/89 PAGE 1

TABLE 44: AREAS WITH SEWER SERVICE

MAP NUMBER NAME OF AREA

1 CITY OF ST AUGUSTINE

2 ST AUGUSTINE SHORES

GLOSSARY

AGGREGATE, SOIL: Many fine particles held in a single mass or cluster.
Natural soil aggregates, such as granules, blocks, or prisms
are called peds.

AQUIFER: A body of saturated rock or sediment through which water
can move readily.

AQUIFER RECHARGE: The process of returning' surface water or rainfall
to the groundwater system. The adaition of new water to an
aquifer or to the zone of saturation.

ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE: Groundwater recharge increased by engineering
techniques.

C HORIZON: A soil layer composed of incompletely weathered parent
material.

CLAY: Sediment composed of particles with diameter less than 1/256
Mm.

COMPLEX, SOIL: A map unit of two or more kinds of soil in such an
intricate pattern or so small an area that it is not practical
to map them separately at the selected scale of mapping. The
pattern and proportion of the soils are somewhat similar in
all areas.,

CONFINING LAYERS: Layers of rock or sediment which reduce the amount
of water recharge to the Floridan Aquifer, also called confining
units oraquacludes.

CRITICAL HABITATS: Habitats for endangered and threatened species.
These areas should be evaluated prior to development to identify
land uses which could adversely impact endangered or threatened
species.

CUTBANKS CAVE: (in tables) The walls of excavations tend to cave
in or slough.

DETENTION: The collection and temporary storage of stormwater in
such a manner as to provide for treatment through physical,
chemical, or biological processes with subsequent gradual release
of the stormwater. Facilities are typically within the line
of flow of the drainage system. Stormwater from a site passes
through the detention facility and is filtered prior to discharge
to remove pollutants.

DRAINAGE BASIN: Consists of a surface stream, its tributaries, and
the surrounding land that these streams drain.

193

194

DRAINAGE DIVIDE: Either natural ridges or cultural features such
as roads railroads, or levees, that separate adjacent drainage
basins. Also called basin boundary or watershed.

EFFLUENT: That which flows out of a septic system.

EROSION: The physical removal of rock or soil by an agent such as
running water, glacial ice, or wind.

EXCESS FINES: (in tables) Excess silt and clay in the soil. The
soil is not a source of gravel or sand for construction purposes.

EXCESS SALTS: (in tables) Excess water-soluble salts in the soils
that restrict the growth of most plants.

FAST INTAKE: (in tables) The rapid movement of water into the soil.

FLOOD BOUNDARY: The 100 year or 500 year f lood boundary is the outer
edge of the flood plain. It is used to delineate which properties
are within the flood plain for regulatory and flood insurance
purposes. The flood boundary usually follows a natural contour
line. The area within a flood boundary which includes the
floodway and floodway fringe.

FLOOD PLAIN: A nearly level alluvial plain that borders a stream
and is subject to flooding unless, protected artificially. A
broad strip of land built up by sedimentation of either side
of a stream channel.

FLOOD PRONE AREAS: Areas where flooding is either common (likely
under normal conditions) or frequent (occurs, on the average,
more than once in two years). Areas of low elevation to which
drainage is direpted.

FLOODING: The temporary inundation of an area, caused by an overflowing
streams by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water
standing for a short period after rainfall or snowmelt is not
considered flooding, nor is water in swamps and marshes.

FLOODWAY: The permanent channel of a stream of other watercourse,
plus any adjacent flood plain areas that must be kept free of
any encroachment in order to discharge the 100 year flood without
substantial increases in flood height.

FRIABLE: Easily crumbled or pulverized.

GRASSED WATERWAY: (in tables) A natural or reconstructed
waterway,typically broad and shallow, seeded to grass as
protection against erosion. Conducts surface water away from
cropland.

GRAVEL: Rounded or angular fragments of rock up to 3 inches (2 mm
to 7.5 cm) in diameter.* An individual piece is a pebble.

GROUND WATER: The water that lies beneath the ground surface, filling
the cracks, crevices, and pore space of rocks.

195

HORIZON, SOIL: Any of the layers of soil that are distinguishable
by characteristic pyhsical or chemical properties. A layer
of soil, approximately parallel to the surface, having distinct
characteristics produced by soil-forming processes.

HUMUS: (in tables) The well decomposed, more or less stable part
of the organic matter in mineral soils.

HYDRIC SOILS: Soils that are sufficiently wet under undrained
conditions to support the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic
vegetation. The list of these soils includes hydric soils that
are either drained or undrained; therefore, not all areas of
hydric soils support predominantly. hydrophytic vegetation and
thus are not wetlands.

HYDROLOGIC CYCLE: The movement of water -and water vapor from the
sea to the atmosphere, to the land-, and back to the sea and
atmosphere again.

HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS: Refers to soils grouped according to their
runoff-producing characteristics. The chief consideration is
the inherent capacity of soil bare of vegetation to permit
infiltration. The slope and kind of plant cover are not
considered but are separate factors in predicting runoff. Soils
are assigned to four groups (see subtask 4D).

HYDROPHYTE: A perennial vascular aquatic plant having its overwintering
buds under water. A plant growing in water or in soil too
waterlogged for most plants to survive.

INFRASTRUCTURE: The underlying foundation or basic framework of
a system.

IRRIGATION: Application of water to soils to assist in production
of crops. ."

LEACHING: The' removal of soluble material from soil or other material
by percolating water.

LIQUID LIMIT: The moisture content at which the soil passes from
a plastic to liquid state.

LOAM: Soil material that is 7 to 27 percent clay particles, 28 to
50 percent silt particles, and less than 52 percent sand
particles.

LOW STRENGTH: (in tables) The soil is not strong enough to support
loads.

MAP UNITS, SOIL: Divide the landscape into areas which consist of
one or more soils for which the unit is named. These soils
have similar characteristics such as depth of each layer, color,
texture, permeability, etc., have been named and numbered.

196

NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION: Pollution associated with land use
activities which do not have a well-defined point of discharge.
Nonpoint contaminants are carried to water bodies by direct
runoff or even by percolation through the soil to groundwater.
While the exact source of nonpoint pollution often is not easily
identified, some potential sources include: 1) Construction
site runoff, 2) Urban stormwater, 3) Leachates from septic
tanks and landfills, and 4) Agricultural runoff.

ORGANIC MATTER: Plant and animal residue in the soil in various
stages of decomposition.

PERCHED WATER TABLE: A water table separated from the main water
table beneath it by a zone that is not saturated.

PERCOLATION: The downward movement of water through the soil.

PERMEABILITY: The capacity to transmit a fluid. The quality of
the soil that enables water to move downward through the profile.
Permeability is measured as the number of inches per hour that
water moves downward through the saturated soil.

PERCS SLOWLY: (in tables) The slow .movement of water through the
soil adversely affecting the specified use.

pH VALUE: A numerical designation of acidity and alkalinity in soil.

PHASE, SOIL: A subdivision of a soil series based on features that
its use and management. For example, slope, stoniness, and
thickness.

PIPING: (in tables) Formation of subsurface tunnels or pipeline
by water moving through the soil.

PLASTIC LIMIT: The moisture content at which a soil changes from
to plastic.

PLASTICITY INDEX: The numerical difference between the liquid limit
the plastic limit; the range of moisture content within which
the soil remains plastic.

POINT SOURCE POLLUTION: Pollution associated with land use activities
which have a well-defined point of discharge, such as a pipe
or a smoke stack. Easier to identify than nonpoint sources.
They include, wastewater treatment plants, industrial facilities,
construction activities, accidental spills, illegal discharges
and others.

PONDING: Standing water on soils in closed depressions. Unless
the soils are artifically drained, the water can be removed
only by percolation or evapotranspiration.

PORE SPACE: The total amount of space taken up by openings between
sediment grains.

197

POROSITY: The percentage of a rock's volume that is taken up by
openings.

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE: The level to which water rises without pumping
in a tightly cased well.

PROFILE, SOIL: A vertical section of the soil extending through
all its horizons and into the parent material.

REACTION, SOIL: A measure of acidity or alkalinity of a soil,
expressed in ph values. A soil that tests to ph 7.0 is described
as precisely neutral in reaction because it is neither acid
nor alkaline.

RESIDUAL SOIL: Soil that develops directly from weathering of the rock
below.

RETENTION: Requires the diversion of the required volume of run-off
to an impoundment area with no subsequent direct discharge to
surface waters. The prevention of discharge of a given volume
of stormwater runoff by complete onsite storage.

RUNOFF: The precipitation discharged into stream channels from an
area. The water that flows off the surface of the land without
sinking into the soil is called surface runoff. Water that
enters the soil before reaching surface streams is called
groundwater runoff or seepage flow from ground water.

SALINITY: Percent of a composition which is saline or salt.

SALTWATER INTRUSION: Process where saltwater replaces surface and
groundwater which were formerly fresh. May be brought on by
reductions of streamflow and channelization, over pumpage of
ground water, rainfall deficits, changes in recharge, construction
of saltwater canals, dredging and other activities.

SAND: As a soil separate, individual or rock mineral fragments from
0.05 mm to 2.0 mm in diameter. Most sand grains consist of
quartz. As a soil textural class, a soil that is 85 percent
or more sand;and@not more than 10 percent clay.

SATURATED ZONE: A subsurface zone in which all rock openings are
filled with water.

SEDIMENT: Loose, solid particles that can originate by 1) weathering
and erosion of preexisting rocks, 2) chemical precipitation
from solution, usually in water, and 3) secretion by organisms.

SEDIMENTATION: A natural process which brings nutrients and other
organic and inorganic materials from upland areas to lowland
areas.

SEEPAGE: (in tables) The movement of water through the soil. Seepage
adversely affects the specified use.

198

SERIES, SOIL: Made up of soils with similar profiles or horizons
which are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

SEPARATE, SOIL: Mineral particles less than two milimeters in
equivalent diameter and ranging between specified size limits.

SHEET EROSION: The removal of a thin layer of surface material,
usually topsoil, by a flowing sheet of water.

SHRINK-SWELL: The shrinking of soil when dry and the swelling when
wet. Shrinking and swelling can damage roads, dams, building
foundations, and other structures. It can also damage plant
roots.

SILT. As a soil separate, individual mineral particles that range
in diameter from the upper limit of clay (0.002 mm) to the lower
limit of very fine-sand (0.05 mm). As a soil textural class,
soil that is 80 percent or more silt and less than 12 percent
clay.

SOIL: A natural, three-dimensional body at the earth's surface.
It is capable of supporting plants and has properties resulting
from the integrated effect of climate and living matter acting
on earth parent material, as conditioned by relief over periods
of time. The layer of weathered, unconsolidated material on
top of bed rock often also being capable of supporting plant
growth.

SLOPE: The inclination of the land surface from the horizontal.
Percentage of slope is the vertical distance divided by horizontal
distance, then multiplied by 100. Thus, a slope of 20 percent
is a drop of 20 feet'in 100 feet.of horizontal distance.

SOLUM: The upper part of a soil profile, above the C horizon in
which the processes of soil formation are active. The living
roots and plant and animal activities are largely confined to
the solum.

STORMWATER:. The flow of water which results from, and which occurs
immediately following, a rainfall event.

STREAM: A moving body of water, confined in a channel and running
downhill under the influence of gravity.

SUBSTRATUM: The part of the soil below the solum.
TEXTURE, SOIL: The relati ve proportion Is of sand, silt, and clay
particles in a mass of soil.

THIN LAYER: (in tables) Ot herwise suitable soil material too thin
for the specified use.

TOPOGRAPHY: Grap4i,cli delineation of natural and man-made features
of a region in a way to show their relative positions and
elevations.

199

TOPSOIL: The upper part of the soil, which is the most favorable
material for plant growth. It is ordinarily rich in organic
matter and is used to topdress roadbanks, lawns, and land affected
by mining.

TRIBUTARY: Small stream flowing into a large stream, adding water
to the large stream.

TURBIDITY: Streamflow that is thick or opaque with sediment.

TURBIDITY CURRENT: A f lowing mass of sediment-laden water that is
heavier than clear water and therefore flows downslope along
the bottom of the sea or a lake.

UNCONSOLIDATED: In referring to sediment. grains, loose, separate,
unattached to one another.

UNSATURATED ZONE: A subsurface zone in which rock openings are filled
partly with air and partly with water; above the saturated zone.

VARIANT, SOIL: A soil having properties sufficiently different from
those of other known soils 'to justify a new series name, but
occurring in such a limited geographic area that creation of
a new series is not justified.

WATER TABLE: Depth to water, below this the soil is saturated. The
upper surface of the zone of saturation. The upper limit of
the soil or underlying rock material that is wholly saturated
with water.

WEATHERING: The group of processes that change rock at or near the
earth's surface. All physical and chemical changes produced
in rocks ior other deposits at or near the earth's surface by
atmospheri6 agents. These changes result in disintegration
and decomposition of the material.

WETLANDS: Hydrologically sensitive areas which are identified by
being inundated or saturated by surface or ground water with
a frequency and duration sufficient to support, a prevalence
of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs
and similar areas. Also identified by hydric soils.

APPENDIX A

CONTRACT NO. CM-207

Appendix A contains a copy of the contract between DER and the St.

Johns County Engineering Department to perform this study. It also contains

the Master Work Plan as addressed in TASK 1.

200

DER:' !Contract No. CM - 207
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION

AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A BASIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR THE MOULTRIE CREEK AND MOSES CREEK WATERSHEDS

This agreement is made and entered into between the
State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and
the St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners,
(hereinafter called DER and CONTRACTOR respectively).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the DER has responsibility for disbursement
of federal funds appropriated under the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended; and,

WHEREAS, the Coastal Zone Managbment Improvement Act
of 1980 requires state coastal management efforts to provide
for the management of coastal resources;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants, promises and representations herein, the
CONTRACTOR and DER hereby agree as follows:

SECTION 1. Scope of Services..

The CONTRACTOR shall perform the services and
specific responsibilities as set forth in Attachment A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof. .

SECTION 2. Compensation.

For satisfactory performance, the DER agrees to
compensate the CONTRACTOR on a fixed price basis in the
amount of $125,000.00 for Phase i work.
The State of Florida's performance and obligation to
pay under thi's, contract is contingent upon an annual
appropriation by the Legislature or continuation of other
funding presently anticipated, without liability - for
anticipated profits for unfinished work.

SECTION 3. Payments.

The CONTRACTOR shall submit invoices in two'copies,
on a convenient basis, but not more frequently than monthly,
based on a percentage of completion. The invoices shall be
submitted in conjunction with the progress reports required
hereunder or with supplemental progress reports meeting the
contract requirements if payment is desired more frequently
than quarterly; additional reimbursement for travel expenses
is not authorized under this agreement. Invoices shall be
in sufficient detail for a preaudit and postaudit thereof.
The DER reserves the right to withhold payment of up to 10%
o,f the total project budget pending receipt and acceptance
of the final report.

SECTION 4. Time of Performance.

This agreement shall cover the period from the date
of execution through -September 30, 1989 subject to the
approval of Attachment A and the availability of funds after
September 29, 1988 by the Office of ocean and Coastal
Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (hereinafter called OCRM/NOAA).

SECTION 5. Approvals and Notices.

A. The CONTRACTOR's project manager is Charles C.
Space, P.E. , County Engineer, telephone 904/824-8131. The
DER project manager is James W. Stoutamire, Office of
Coastal Management, -telephone -.904/488-4805 or " (Suncom)
278-4805. DER reserves the right to - approve changes in
project managers upon receipt of a written request; however,
this approval will not require a contract amendment. All
matters shall be coordinated with or directed to the project
.managers for proper disposition.

B. Any notice or other written communications
between the CONTRACTOR and the DER shall be considered
delivered when posted by certified mail or delivered* in
person to the respective project manager.

C. Either party may request changes In the scope of
the services to be performed hereunder. Those changes which
are mutually agreed upon shall be made by a written order
designated to be a change order. Any change order which
causes a change in the cost or time of performance shall be
incorporated in written amendments to the agreement.

D. This:. agreement may be extended or renewed should
additional funds" and/or time become available to continue
the project. Any extension or renewal will be contingent on
approval of an, extension or renewal of the availability of
these funds by "the OCRM/NOAA.

SECTION 6. Work/Reports Re uired.

A. Proiect-Initiation Report
This report shall be submitted within two weeks of
the contract begihning date and shall include, for approval
by DER: names and brief credentials of staff persons
assigned to the project.

B. Progress Reports
Progress reports shall be submitted every three
months beginning January 1, 1988. These reports shall
consist of a summary of the work completed on the project to
date and shall be based on project tasks listed in
Attachment A. Progress reports shall also include any press
clippings or press notices related to this project.

IZO31
C. Interim and Final Reports
In accordance with Attachment A, draft interim
reports will be submitted at the completion of Tasks 2, 3,
and 4. The final report in eight copies shall be submitted
upon completion of tasks in accordance with the requirements
of Attachment A, shall include a separate executive summary
document briefly outlining the work conducted and its
results, and shall be submitted no later than the completion
date of the contract.

D. Ownership of Documents
All reports produced and other data gathered by the
CONTRACTOR for the purpose of this contract shall become the
mutual property of the OCRM/NOAA, the DER, and the
CONTRACTOR without restriction or limitation upon their use
and shall be made available by the CONTRACTOR at any time
upon request of the DER.

E. Copyrights
Books, publications, or other copyrightable
materials developed l.uftder this agreement may be copyrighted
provided that -the DER and the OCRM/NOAA reserve a
royalty-free nonexclusive * and irrevocable right to
reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize
others to use,.the materials for government purposes.

F. Dogumentation
The cover or title page of all reports, studies,
maps or other documents resulting from contracts supported
in whole or in part by this grant shall contain the
following statement: Funds for this project were provided
by the Department of Environmental Regulation, Office of
Coastal Management using funds made available through the
National oceanic; and Atmospheric Administration under the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended.

SECTION T. United-States Government Involvement.
A. This agreement is funded i@ part by a grant from
the OCRM/NOAA. In exchange for Coastal Zone Management
funding, the CONTRACTOR agrees to abide by and comply with
OMB Circular A-102 and A-87.

B. The CONTRACTOR agrees that the DER, the
Comptroller General of the United States or any of his duly
authorized representatives and the United States Secretary
of Commerce or any of his duly authorized representatives
shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure
of funds under this agreement, have access to and the right
to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers,
and records of the CONTRACTOR involving transactions related
to this agreement. The CONTRACTOR agrees that payment(s)
made under this agreement shall be subject to reduction for
amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of

audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under
this agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall refund by check
payable to the DER the amount of such reduction of
payments. All required records shall be maintained until an
audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are
resolved, or three years after completion of the-project and
submission of a final invoice, whichever is sooner.

SECTION 8. Non-Supplanting.

Federal funds made available for state or local
projects under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as
amended, may not be so used as to supplant state or . other
funds that would be available in the absence of such federal
funds for coastal zone management program activities, but
rather will be so used as to increase-such state or other
funds available for coastal zone management.

SECTION 9. Responsibilities of DER.

The DER shall:

A. Provi de guidance, assistance and coordination to
the extent necessary and feasible;

B. Provide reference documents as required;

C. Provide for timely review of drafts and interim
reports, and furnish comments, suggestions or approvals as
appropriate;

D. Provide for review of the final report draft and
furnish comments with-in twenty working days.

SECTION 10. Decisions by the DER.

All ser vices shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR to
the satisfaction of the Secretary of DER or his designated
representative, who shall decide all questions,
difficulties, and disputes of whatever nature which may
arise under or by reason of the agreement, the prosecution
and fulfillment of the services hereunder and the character,
quality, amount and value thereof. The Secretary's decision
upon all claims, questions and disputes shall be final,
conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto. This
section shall not preclude any party from seeking relief by
filing a petition for an administrative hearing pursuant to
Chapter 120, F.S.,

SECTION 11. Termination of Agreement.

A. Termination for Convenience
This contract may be terminated by either party at
any time prior to fulfillment following thirty calendar days
written notice, delivered by certified mail return receipt

requested, to the other party. The CONTRACTOR shall be paid
for services performed and/or costs incurred based on an
estimate of that portion of the work that has been
completed, as determined by the DER.

B. Termination for Cause
If the CONTRACTOR shall fail to fulfill -in a timely
and proper manner its obligations under this contract, or if
the CONTRACTOR shall violate any of the , covenants,'
agreements, or stipulations of this contract, the DER shall
thereupon have the right to terminate this contract by
giving written notice to the CONTRACTOR of such termination
and specifying the effective time/date thereof. . In that
event, all items or materials furnished by the DER and any
finished or unfinished reports, notes, or field data
prepared by the CONTRACTOR shall immediately be delivered to
a place designated by DER, and the -CONTRACTOR shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work or services completed..
Notwithstanding the above, the CONTRACTOR shall not
be relieved of liability to the DER for damages sustained by
the DER by virtue of any breach of the contract by the
CONTRACTOR, and the DER may withhold any payments to the
CONTRACTOR for the purpose of setoff until such time as the
exact amount of damage due the DER is determined,

C. Termination Based Upon Withdrawal of Federal
Funds
This contract is subject to the availability and
continuation of federal funding anticipated at the time of
execution. Should funding be discontinued or reduced, the
contract will be terminated or amended, as appropriate, and
the CONTRACTOR shall be compensated for work or services
completed,

D. Tei mination for Refusal to Allow Public Access
to Records
Me DER reserves the right to unilaterally cancel
this agreement for refusal by the CONTRACTOR to allow public
access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material
subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes
and made or received by the CONTRACTOR in conjunction with
the contract.

SECTION.12. Disclaimer of Liability.

The CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify, defend,
save and hold harmless the DER from all claims, demands,'
liabilities, and suits of any nature whatsoever arising out
of, because of, or due to any negligent act or occurrence of
omission or commission of the CONTRACTOR, its agents, or
employees to the extent permitted by Florida law.

SECTION 13. Interest of the CONTRACTOR.

The CONTRACTOR covenants that it presently has no
interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or
indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with
the performance of services required to be performed under
this contract. The CONTRACTOR further covenants that in the
@erformance of this contract no person having any such
interest shall be employed.

SECTION 14. Personnel.

A. To the extent required by law, the CONTRACTOR
will secure and maintain such insurance as will protect it
from claims by employees under the Workers' Compensation Act
and from claims by employees for bodily injury or death
which may arise from the performance,-of its services under
this contract.

B. The CONTRACTOR assures that the program
supported by the grant will be conducted in compliance with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L.88-352) as
ariended, (42USC2000d) and the requirements imposed by the
regulations of the, Department of Commerce (15CFRPart8)
issued pursuant to that Title. In accordance therewith no
person in the United States shall, on the ground of race,
color, or national origin, be excluded from participation
in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity for which the
CONTRACTOR receives federal financial - assistance and the
CONTRACTOR will immediately take any measures necessary to
effectuate this agreement.

SECTION 15. Officials not to Benefit.
No memb er of or de *legate to Congress', or resident
Commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this
contract or to'any benefit that may arise therefrom.

SECTION 16. Covenant Against Contingent Fees.

The CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the CONTRACTOR, to solicit or
secure this agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to
pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm,
other than a bona fide employee working solely for the
CONTRACTOR, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or other
consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of this contract. For breach or violation of this
provision, the DER shall have the right to * terminate the
agreement without liability and, at its discretion, to
deduct from the contract price, or otherwise recover, the
full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or
consideration. The DER shall further be responsible for

Fz' o
reporting the details of such breach or violation to the
proper legal authorities, when and where appropriate.

SECTION 17. Agreement as Including Entire Agreement.

This instrument embodies the entire agreement of the
parties. There are no provisions, terms, conditions or
obligations other than those contained ..herein; and this
agreement shall supersede all previous communication,
representation or agreements, either verbal or written
between the parties'hereto.

ST. JOHNS COUNTY BOARD OF STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IRONMENTAL REGULATION

SVtary I
Date: Date: 16'- 7
L
NV
" V'L

Attachment A
MASTER WORK PLAN

Proiect Title

Development of a Basin Management Program for the Lower
Matanzas River - Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek Watersheds
(Reference NOAA Task 2.1).

Background And Statement Of The Problem

The Florida Coastal Management Program has previously
supported (1979) investigations of shellfish growing areas in
the Matanzas River, toward the overall goal of protecting these
resources from the effects of anticipated population growth.
These investigations identified septic tanks and non-point
source pollution (i.e. stormwater drainage) as the major
threats to the future health of the area's estuarine waters.
Subsequently, the St. Johns County Commission adopted a
county-wide drainage ordinance and strengthened regulation of
septic tanks. Additionally, the state adopted more stringent
water quality standards for much of the area.

In spite of these regulator y actions, most of the shell-
fish growing areas in St. Johns County recently have been
closed to harvesting and the remaining "conditionally approved"
areas are threatened. It is now generally recognized that
maintenance of the overall health of estuarine resources in the
area will require more comprehensive, basin-wide management
approaches as well as refinement of existing project-by-project
regulatory actions administered by St. Johns County, DER and
@he St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD),
including special' area management.

Major obstacles confronting basin-wide management in the
@rea include the size and complexity of drainage areas
involved, a severe lack of detailed information upon which to
develop needed plans and ordinances, as well as rapid popu-
lation growth in critical water-hed areas. For maximum
efficiency in using available funds and expertise, efforts
toward addressing these problems must be directed at priority
geographic areas and regulatory improvement needs.

Project Area

The priority area selected for this project is
experiencing increasing development pressures and poses
critical flood prevention and stormwater management problems as
growth occurs. Relative to other parts of the County,
significant natural resources in the area remain undisturbed.

Work during 1987-88 will focus on the Moultrie Creek and
Moses Creek watersheds. In general, this includes the area
east of the Interstate 95 highway, bounded on the north by
State road 312 and on the south by State Road 206. State road
207 forms the northwest boundary (see figure 1). Adjacent
waters of the Matanzas River are also included.

Project Objectives

This work is Phase 1 of a 2-3 year project which will
provide the basis for county-wide improvements in stormwater
management, flood protection and protection of natural
resources. Phase I work will emphasize developing a sound data
base on characteristics/conditions of the study area.
Information developed will be in sufficient detail and in a
form usable for day-to-day regulatory and engineering work by
the County Engineer's office, as well -as for developing
prehensive basin management strategies in Phase 2 of the
project.
com

Specific phase I work objectives are as follows:

1. Develop a comprehensive inventory of areas within the
watersheds that deserve special management
consideration. This inventory will be used as a basis
for the following:
a. Improving coordination and regulation consistency
between St. Johns County, the St. Johns River
Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and DER;
b. Revising the County's comprehensive plan; and
c. Future resource investigations by state and local
agencies.

2. Develop-detailed information on topography, soils,
flood prone areas, land use and other conditions
pertinent to achieving stormwater management, flood
prevention, and resource protection objectives for the
study area.

3. Develop refinements for special area protection under
County Ordinance 86-4 and apply these refinements
within the study area. This will include.specific
recommended actions such as stormwater master plans,
improved performance standards for new development,
provision of infrastructure to reduce environmental
impacts, and improved coordination between state,
regional, and local efforts to control non-point
pollution.

4. Use products developed for special area management in
the project area as a prototype for improving flood
protection and stormwiter controls in critical
resource areas throu@iiiout the County.

b 01
- 71r-7
lei -4
rT
-mt

!A ri
A ri

jz
GUSTINE.
SA ST.'
-tLO 0 =..col
17,

is
Uc

"top.-

31 ;2
T. Aurusfuq
BEACH"
ft
AIA

L
t!l
r

207
iAlio I
=4
'n

t 0
30

-3
c

C
-Ml , @ ---- -N 1 1,: , I
@j 31

207

In
h
31
J-1
General Study Area
is Is 4AIA

M-7
31

7 95
"I IArl

"IlUct. c
t S
Pik.

Master Work Plan

Five major tasks have been developed to achieve project
objectives in Phase 1.

Task 1: Project refinement
Task 2: Assess opportunities for refining existing plans,
regulations, and management tools.

Task 3: Establish an understanding of the hydrology.of the
Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek watersheds.

Task 4: Inventory and assess land characteristics/land use
within the watersheds.
Task 5: Analysis of-information developed in Tasks"l through 4.

Results of these tasks will provide the basis for setting
resource management goals/objectives and developing a watershed
management plan during FY 1988.

TASK SUMMARIES

Task 1Project r.e.finement

This task will finalize the plan of work and contract
scope of services required to achieve project-objectives.

Work Products:

1. Final plan of work.

Responsibilities:

DER/OCM: Partiolpate in develo ping plan of work.

St. Johns County: Finalize pl,..n of work.

SJRWMD: Provide advice and technical information as
appropriate.
Task 2: Assess Opportunities for Refi@inq Existing Plans,
Regulations, and Management Tools

This evaluation will be ongoing throughout the life of the
project and will focus on achieving specific, practical
improvements. Initially, emphasis will be on:

Subtask A. Refinement of the existing St. Johns County
drainage ordinance (No. 86-4) to provide consideration of
special management area and water quality protection needs
including:

1. On site treatment criteria for stormwater.
2. Improved design criteria and methodologies
governing both the quality and quantity of
stormwater discharge.

Subtask B. Identifying mechanisms whereby sto .rmwater
management can be incorporated in other County plans and
programs, including:

1. Road construction, density and zoning controls,
local government comprehensive plan, etc.

2. Identification of stormwater-related
infrastructure needs, including land acquisition,
flow easements, engineering design, etc. as well
as funding mechanisms for meeting these needs.

Subtask C. Increasing mutual support between County,
Water Management District, and State programs regarding
control of pollution inputs to estuarine waters.

Work Products: Preliminary and final dtaft reports on Subtasks
A, B, and C.

Responsibilities:

St. Johns County: Conduct assessment and produce report(s);
provide drafts to DER and SJRWMD for review and comment.

DER/OCM: Review and comment.

SJRWMD: Review and comment.

Task 3: Establish An Understanding of.The Hydrology of The
Moultrie Creek And Moses Creek Watersheds.

This task is intended to provide information on stream
flow characteristics as a basis for managing loadings of future
land uses within-the study area. Work will involve:
Subtask A.- Review and assess existing USGS, FEMA, and
SJRWMI) streamflow information an the Moultrie Creek and
Moses Creek drainage systems, including rainfall and other
pertinent information.

Subtask B. Identify needs for additional stream gauges
and install as needed.

Subtask C. Document existing streamflow data in terms of:

1. Total average flows;
2. Seasonal and long7term, extremes;
3. Major and minor tributaries;
4. Contributing wateished averages;
5. Discharge vs. frequency relationships;
6. Storage vs. frequency relationships.

E13]

Work Products:

1. Collection and assessment of existing streamflow
information on the Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek
systems. Information will be taken from USGS, SJRWMD,
COE, DOT, FEMA, and other sources as available -to
determine stage-discharge-frequency relationships and
basin acreages for both the main watercourses and
their tributaries.
2. Identification of the need for and installation of
additional stream gauges as necessary.

Responsibilities:

DER/OCM: Coordination and technical assistance as appropriate.

St. Johns County: Provide assessment/interim report based on
existing information.

SJRWMD: Help provide existing information, coordinate with
U.S.G.S., assist in location/installation of.stream gauges, and
assist in interpretation of data.

Task-4: Inventory and Assess Land Characteristics/Land Use
Within the Moultrie Creek and Moses Creek Watersheds.

Work under this task will provide information on the
physical characteristics, drainage patterns, and potential
sources of pollution. This task will provide the basis for
understanding the hydrologic limitations of the area for urban
development as well as developing strategies for flood
protection/prevention, infrastructure needs, wetland
protection, etc"...

Subtask A: Delineate/Map Topography of the Study Area.

1. Obtain low-level aerial photography (scale
I"=200') for the study area.
2. Construct topographic maps of the study area
(maximum of 2' interval).i

Subtask B: Inventory/Map Natural Water Conveyance/Storage
System.

This subtask includes floodplains, flood prone areas, etc.
described in sufficient detail to identify areas critical
for maintaini .ng-, natural hydroperiods, regional flood
control and flood protection of individual facilities..

FZ1qJ
Subtask C: Inventory/Map Man-made Water' Conveyance/
Storage System

Work will include inventory of all major ditches, swales,
storm sewers, detention ponds, retention ponds, etc., with
detailed information as available, including-size, invert
elevations, storage capacity, etc.

Subtask D: Detailed Soils Survey.

Using the most recent, detailed soils information
determine and map (scale: 1"=200'):

1. Areas where soils may be limited for septic tanks,
detention/retention ponds, infrastructure, etc.
(Using Table 3, SCS Survey)..
2. Areas where soils are easily erodible and erosion
control measures are especially needed to prevent
sediment transport off-site.

Subtask E: Identify and Map Important Natural Resource
Areas of the Two Watersheds.

Use existing information from sources such as the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Florida Department of Natural Resources and
others, to identify areas within the watersheds that have
important values as habitat or which should otherwise be
@rotected as part of stormwater management efforts. This will
include preparation of a preliminary wetlands map (scale
1"=200') based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands
Inventory and an the hydrologically sensitive soils index
contained within the SJRWMD Applicant's Handbook.

Subtask F:; Map an Asses.3 Existing Land Uses and Areas
Where Floo ding Problems Exist.

Using the.most recent land use information, supplemented
by aerial'photography and hydrologic information,

1. Map land uses in sufficient detail to estimate
stormwater runoff to adjacent water bodies.
2. Identify residential flooding problems, septic
tanks in flood prone areas, erosion into water
courses and other flood problems of potential
concern.

Subtask G: Identify Point and Non-Point Pollution Sources.

Using existing information from DER, DUR, St. Johns County
Health Dept., etc., identify solid waste sites, high
density residential areas with septic tank systems, storm
sewer outfalls, package sewage treatment plants, sludge
disposal areas, etc. which may be potential pollutant
inputs to the watersheds. This information will be used
to define priority corrective actions in Phase 2 of the
project.

Work Products:

Subtask A: Aerial photographs with topography (1"=200'1
maximum of 2' contour interval).
Subtask B: Map Overlays (1"=200') andidescriptive text
delineating the drainage/storage systems.

Subtask C: Map Overlays (1"=200') and text delineating and
describing the man-made water conveyanc ;e system.
Subtask D: Map Overlays (1"=200') with soils limitations and
text explaining limitations.

Subtask E: Map Overlay (1"=200') and text describing important
natural resource areas.

Subtask F: Existing land use map (1"=200') and descriptive
text.
Subtask G:' Draft inventory on point and non-point pollution
sources, with maps and-text as appropriate.

Responsibilities:
@t. Johns County: Provide all information gathering,
interpretation, map construction and interpretive text.

DER/OCM: Overall project coordination, review and comment on
work products.
SJRWMD: Review and comment on work products, provide
information and:,technical assistance as appropriate.

Task 5: Analysi s of Information Developed in Tasks I through 4.

This task:'.involves the compilation and interpretation of
all pertinent information generated within the previous four
tasks for use as the basis for formulating a comprehensive
basin management plan, including:

Subtask A. Assessment of potential erosion'and
sedimentation problems of existing land uses.

Subtask B. Estimates of the ability of the drainage
systems to accommodate existing runoff volumes and
evaluation of current local and state regulations to
manage these systems in a way that will ensure future
capacity and protect water quality.

Subtask C. General assessment of potential impacts of
development and flood control facilities on important
habitat and other areas identified in Task 4 as needing
special protection.

Subtask D. Proposed strategy for incorporating these
findings within the local government's multi-department
development review process to provide direct practical
application of project findings and - recommendat ions.

Work Products:

Draft and Final Reports covering Subtasks A,. B, C and D
for use in Phase 2 of the project.

Responsibilities:

St. Johns County: Provide preliminary and final draft Phase 1
reports.

SJRWMD: Review and comment on reports.

DER/OCM: Project management, review and comment on reports.

Phase 2 Tentative Work Plan

Specific work to be accomplished during year two of the project
will be determined at the conclusion of Phase 1. *B.ased upon
previous work products, Phase 2 will develop conclusions,
specific recommendati,ons for improving existing ordinances,
management capabilitie-s, etc., as well as recommended basin
wide strategies for stormwater management flood protection and
protection of natural resources.

Task 1: Update Published Streamflow Information to accurately
Reflect Present Watershed Conditions, and Provide Analysis of
Hydrologic Characteristics of the Moultrie Creek and Moses
Creek Systems.

Task 2: Constru6t A Future Land use Map of the Study Area,
including Planned Infrastructure (Scale of 1" = 200').

Task 3: Assessment of Potential Stormwater Management, Flood
Protection, and Natural Resource Protection Problems From
Projected Land Use In the Study Area.

Task 4: Develop Recommended Basin-Wide Strategies For
Stormwater Management, Flood Protection And Natural Resource
Protection.

Recommendations will include at least the following
considerations:
Subtask A: Identification of prio'rity corrective actions
regarding existing problems (i.e., point'and non-point
pollution sources, erosion/sedimentation, flooding,
capital improvements, etc.).

Subtask B: Cost-effective meas ures for addressing
existing flooding and stormwater problems.

Vol
Subtask C: Water quality protection through:

1. On-site stormwater treatment.
2. Basin-wide treatment facilities (e.g. retention/
detention facilities).
3. Septic tank and sewage treatment controls.

Subtask D: Natural resource protection through better
stormwater regulation, flood protection, and wetlands
management.

Subtask E: Requirements for meeting infrastructure needs,
such as water management structures, sewage treatment,
road construction, etc.

Subtask F: Requirements for local,-state or water
management district funding.

Subtask G: Incorporation of recommendations into County
land use plans, zoning, building codes, capital
improvement budgets, etc.

Subtask H: Increasing mutual support between County,
Water Management District and State programs to coordinate
growth management efforts in regulating both surface and
subsurface discharge of potential contaminants to
estuarine waters.

APPENDIX B

DETAILED SOIL INFORMATION

The USDA SCS performed a detailed soil survey of St. Johns County,

Florida. A report of their findings was issued in October, 1983. In

producing this soil survey, aerial photographs were taken at a scale

of 1:20,000. Using these photographs and ground inspection, experienced

soil scientists delineated the soils into detailed map units. TABLE

12 lists these soils map units and FIGURE 6 shows the boundaries of

these map units, but due to the scale limitation the individual soil

numbers are not shown.

Each map unit represents an area consisting of one or more soils

for which the unit is named. Soils with similar characteristics, such

as depth of each layer, color, texture, permeability, etc., have been

established, named and numbered. Soils with similar profiles are

combined to form a "soil series". TABLE 13 lists the soil units and

the respective series. With the exception of differences in surface

layer or underlying material texture, each of the soils within a

particular series consist of major horizons that are similar in

composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture within the surface layer

or the underlying material. They can also differ in slope, stoniness,

salinity, wetness, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that

affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series

is divided into "soil phases". Most of the areas shown on the detailed

soil maps are phases of soils series. The name of a soil phase commonly

218

219

indicates a feature that affects its use or management. For example,

"Riviera fine sand, frequently flooded", is one of several phases in

the Riviera series.

Some map units are made up of two or more soils. These map units

are called "soil complexes". A soil complex consists of two or more

soils which exist in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas

that they cannot be shown separately on the soil maps. The pattern

and proportion of these soils are somewhat similar in all areas.

Fripp-Satellite Complex, identified as soil number 31, is an example

of a soil complex which can be found withiin the study area.

When interpreting the soil survey maps it is important to keep in

mind the scale (1:20,000) of the aerial photographs used in preparing

the soil survey. Considerable time and effort has been expended by

many soil scientists using topographic maps, photographic interpretation,

and ground truthings to classify the soils. Because the actual

boundaries between the soil types are approximate and not absolute,

field verification is recommended when relating this information to

a particular location. The SCS Soil Survey contains a detailed soil

description for each soil map unit, as well as many tables describing

different properties of each of the soils found within St. Johns County.

MISCELLANEOUS SOILS

Because many of the soil tables refer to the soil description rather

than give the soil's properties in the table, a few unique soils with

special properties are worth mentioning more specifically. (This is

done by an * in the Soil Survey, and by 99.99 in the tables here.)

These unique soils are: Beaches U28), Pits 038), and Arents U55),

as well as St. Augustine 057), Immokalee 053), Astatula (#54) -Urban land

220

complex, and Fripp-Satellite complex (#31).

Beaches 028) are nearly level strips of sand along the coast of

the Atlantic Ocean. These strips are at least partially covered by

seawater during tides, and are therefore subject to movement by tides

and high winds often found at the beaches. This soil is a mixture

of light gray to white quartz sand, few to many brown and black sand-size

grains of heavy minerals, and sea shells and shell fragments.

Pits (#38) consists of excavations from which soil and geologic

material have been removed, primarily for use in road construction,

fill for low areas, and building foundations. Pits are locally called

borrow pits and can be square or rectangular in shape. These areas

have little or no value for growth of agricultural crops or pine trees,

and are often filled with water due to the high water table in some

areas.

Arents 055) are nearly level soils made up of heterogeneous soil

material that has been removed from other soils and used in land leveling

as fill material, or as a final covering for sanitary landfill. This

material is a mixture of fine sand or sand and fragments of sandy subsoil

material that have dark organic accumulations. These areas can be

square or rectangular in shape. Arents soils do not have an orderly

sequence of soil layers and in some areas large cells of solid waste

refuse can be found below a depth of two to four feet.

Urban land consists mainly of streets, sidewalks, parking lots,

buildings, and other structures which obscure or alter the soils to

such a degree that identification of the soil is not feasible. St.

Augustine-Urban land complex (#51) consists of nearly level, somewhat

poorly drained St. Augustine soils that have been used for urban development.

Immokalee-Urban land complex (#53) consists of poorly drained, nearly

221

level Immokalee soils and urban land. Astatula-Urban land complex

(#54) consists of nearly level to sloping, excessively drained Astatula

soils on broad upland ridges and urban land.

Fripp-Satellite complex 031) contains 1.) excessively drained,

rolling or hilly Fripp soil on narrow relict (something left unchanged

in the presence of change) beach dunes 2.) and somewhat poorly drained,

nearly level Satellite soil in narrow swales between areas of the Fripp

soil. These soils form in thick sandy deposits of marine origin mixed

with small amounts of shell and shell fragments. Because of the fragile

nature of the dunes, the slope is important in this soil complex. The

slope of the Fripp soil ranges from eight to fifteen percent. Slopes

are convex and short, with lengths generally ranging from 50 feet to

75 feet from crest to base. The slope of Satellite soil ranges from

zero to two percent and is concave and narrow. Fripp fine sand usually

constitutes 40 to 70 percent of this complex, while Satellite fine

sand constitutes 20 to 35 percent of the complex.

USE OF SOIL INF' ORMATION

The "Use a .nd Management of the Soils" section of the SCS Soil Survey

contains soils information useful in engineering applications.

Information in this section of the Soil Survey is intended for land

use, planning, evaluating land use alternatives, and planning site

investigations prior to design and construction. However, the

information has limitations. For example, estimates of soil

characteristics and other data generally apply only to that part of

the soil within a depth of five or six feet. In addition, small areas

of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific

222
soil, as a result of map scale.

It is important to recognize that this information is not highly

site specific and can not substitute for onsite investigation and soils

testing and analysis by personnel experienced in- the design and

construction of engineering works. The line delineating the soil

boundaries may not be precise or may be questioned; therefore, a site

inspection is still a necessity.

Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land

uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing

the information in this section of the SCS Soil Survey. Local ordinances

and regulations need to be considered in planning, in site selection,

and in design.

This information can be used to:

1. Evaluate the potential of areas for residential, commercial,
industrial and recreation uses.

2. Make preliminary estimates of construction conditions.

3. Evaluate alternative routes for roads, streets, highways,
pipelines, and underground cables.

4. Evaluate alternative sites for sanitary landfills, septic tank
absorption fields, and sewage lagoons.

5. Plan de'tailed onsite investigations of soils and geology.

6. Locate potential sources of gravel, sand, earthfill, and topsoil.

7. Plan drainage systems, irrigation systems, ponds, and other
structures for soil and water conservation.

8. Predict performance of proposed small structures and pavements
by comparing the performance of existing similar structures
on the same or similar soils.

USING THE MOST RECENT, DETAILED SOILS INFORMATION, DETERMINE AND MAP
(SCALE: 1" = 200')

1. AREAS WHERE SOILS MAY BE LIMITED FOR SEPTIC TANKS,
DETENTION/RETENTION PONDS, INFRASTRUCTURE, ETC. -

SEPTIC TANKS

The effectiveness of septic tanks depends on the ability of absorption

fields to filter effluent from the septic tank. This ability is based

on limitations of soil properties and the depth to the water table.

The SCS Soil Survey lists the degree and, type of soil limitations that

effect septic tank absorption fields. Reference Table 16 of the SCS

Soil Survey for the various types, depths, and occurrences of seasonal

high water tables.

Absorption Fields - Reformatted in TABLE 14 are the degree and

the kind of soil limitations that affect septic tank absorption fields.

Those soils with limitations for septic tanks are shown in FIGURE 7.

Limitations considered are:

SLIGHT - Soil properties and site features are generally favorable
for the indicated use and limitations are minor and easily
overcome.,,,

MODERATE Soil properties or site features are not favorable for
the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance
is needed to overcome or minimize the limitations.

SEVERE - Soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or
so difficult to overcome that special design, significant increases
in construction costs, and possibly increased maintenance are
required.

Additionally, a hazard of groundwater contamination may exist in

areas having many septic tank absorption fields in the following soils:

Astatula (#2) Beaches 028)

Tavares 06) Fripp 031)

Paola 023) Palm Beach (#32)

Septic tank absorption fields are areas in which effluent from a septic

223

224

tank is distributed into the soil through subsurface tiles or perforated

pipe. In determining soil suitability for septic tank absorption fields,

only that part of the soil between depths of 24- to 72 inches is

evaluated. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features,

and observed performance of the soils. Permeability, a high water

table, depth to a confining layer, and flooding influence absorption

of the effluent.

Unsatisfactory performance of septic tank absorption fields, including

excessively slow absorption and surfacing of effluent can affect 'Public

health. Groundwater can be polluted if highly permeable sand and gravel

is less than four feet below the base of the absorption field, the

slope is excessive, or the water table is near the surface. There

must be unsaturated soil material beneath the absorption field to filter

the effluent effectively. The St. Johns County Health Department will

specify the thickness of the unsaturated soil layer based upon the

results of an onsite percolation test.

Seasonal High Water Table - Septic tank absorption fields are affected

by a high water table and by seasonal high water tables of the soils.

TABLE 15, obtained from information Table 16 of the Soil Survey, gives

the depth to the seasonal high water table, the kind of water table

(Apparent, Artesian, or Perched), and the months during which it is

commonly high. A seasonal high water table is the highest level of

a saturated zone in the soil in most years. The depth to a seasonal

high water table applies only to undrained soils. A water table that

is seasonally high for less than one month is not indicated in the

table.

A plus sign preceding the range in depth indicates that the water

table is above the surface of the soil (a condition of ponding). The

225

first numeral in the range indicates how high the water rises above

the surface. The second numeral indicates the depth below the surface.

Those soils subject to ponding due to a seasonal high water table are

shown on FIGURE 8.

Other depths shown in TABLE 15 without a plus sign preceding the

range in depth indicate the depth to water table below the surface.

A percent sign M for the maximum depth indicates that the water table

was encountered at a greater depth than six feet. Only saturated zones

within a depth of about six feet were investigated.

Only apparent water tables are found in St.Johns County. An apparent

water table is a thick zone of free water in the soil. It is indicated

by the level at which water stands in an uncased borehole, after adequate

time is allowed for adjustment in the surrounding soil.

DETENTION/RETENTION PONDS

Site features relating to drainage, irrigation, embankments, and

grassed water ways are considered to address the stormwater management
issue of deten@ ion and retention pond design. The physical and chemical

properties of the soils also affect the water management mechanisms.

Table 13 of the Soil Survey gives information on the soil properties

and site features that affect water management. The degree and kind

of soil limitations are given for embankments and for aquifer-fed ponds.

Site Features - The limitations for water management devices

considered are:

SLIGHT - Soil properties and site features are generally favorable
for the indicated use and limitations are minor and are easily
overcome.

MODERATE - Soil properties or site features are not favorable for
the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance
is needed to overcome or minimize the limitation.

226

SEVERE - Soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or
so difficult to overcome that special design, significant increase
in construction costs, and possibly increased maintenance are
required.

TABLE 16 contains the degree and kind of soil limitations for

embankments. These are raised structures of soil material, generally

less than twenty feet high, which are constructed to impound water

or to protect land against flooding. The soils are rated as a source

of material for embankment fill. The ratings apply to the soil material

below the surface layer to a depth of about five feet. It is assumed

that soil layers will be uniformly mixed and compacted during

construction.

The ratings do not indicate the ability of the natural soil to support

an embankment. Soil properties to a depth even greater than the height

of the embankment can affect performance and safety of the embankment.

Generally, extensive onsite investigation is needed to determine these

properties.

Soil material in embankments must be resistant to seepage, piping,

and erosion an d have favorable compaction characteristics. Unfavorable

features include less than five feet of suitable material and a high

content of stones, organic matter, salts, or sodium. A high water

table affects the amount of usable material.

TABLE 17 lists the degree and kind of soil limitations for aquifer-fed

excavated ponds. These ponds are pits or dugouts that extend to a

ground water aquifer. Excluded are ponds that are fed only by surface

run-off and embankment ponds that impound water three feet or more

above the original surface. Excavated ponds are affected by the depth

to the fluctuating water table found in St. Johns County; the

permeability of the aquifer; and the quality of the water as inferred

227
from the salinity of the soil. The depth to a hardpan layer and the

content of large stones affect the ease of excavation.

Other water management mechanisms that may be important when reviewing

soil potential for retention and detention ponds include drainage,

irrigation, diversions, and grassed waterways. The features of the

soil that affect these water management mechanisms are listed in TABLES

18 through 21.

TABLE 18 lists the features affecting each soil when used for

drainage. Drainage is the removal of excess surface and subsurface

water from the soil. How easily and effectively the soil is drained

depends on the depth to hardpan or other layers that affect the rate

of water movement, permeability, depth to high water table or the depth

of standing water (if the soil is subject to ponding), slope,

susceptibility to flooding, and subsidence of organic layers. Excavating

and grading and the stability of ditchbanks are affected the by depth

to hardpan, large stones, slope, and the hazard of cutbanks caving.

The productivi.ty of the soil after drainage is adversely affected by
extreme acidity'' or by toxic substances in the root zone, such as salts,

sodium, or sulfur. Availability of drainage outlets is not considered

in the ratings.

TABLE 19 lists the features affecting each soil when used for

irrigation. Irrigation is the controlled application of water to

supplement rainfall and support plant growth. The design and management

of an irrigation system are affected by the depth to high water table,

the need for drainage, flooding, available water capacity, intake rate,

permeability, erosion hazard, and slope. The construction of an

irrigation system is affected by large stones and the depth to a hardpan

228
layer. The performance of a system is affected by the depth of the

root zone, the amount of salts or sodium, and soil reaction.

TABLE 20 lists the features affecting each soil when used for

diversions. Diversions are embankments or a combination of channels

and ridges constructed across a slope to reduce erosion and conserve

moisture by intercepting runoff. Slope, wetness, large stones, and

depth to a hardpan layer affect the construction of diversions. A

restricted rooting depth, a severe hazard- of wind or water erosion,

an excessively coarse texture, and restricted permeability adversely

affect maintenance.

TABLE 21 lists the features affecting each soil when used for grassed

waterways. Grassed waterways are natural or constructed channels,

generally broad and shallow, that conduct surfacewater to outlets at

a nonerosive velocity. Large stones, wetness, slope, and depth to

a hardpan layer affect the construction of grassed waterways. A hazard

of wind erosion, low available water capacity, restricted rooting depth,

toxic substanc:es such as salts or sodium, and restricted permeability

adversely affect the growth and maintenance of the grass after

construction.'

Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils - Another soil property

that affects behavior of a soil for detention and retention ponds is

permeability. TABLES 22 and 23 (from Table 15 of the Soil Survey)

list estimates of some physical and chemical properties of soils,

including permeability, percentage of clay particles, bulk density,

available water capacity, and soil reaction or pH. These estimates

are given for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. These

estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these

and similar soils.

229
Clay as a soil separate, or soil particle, consists of mineral soil

particles that are less that 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In TABLE

22, the estimated clay content of each major soil layer is given as

a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2

millimeters in diameter.

The percentage and characteristics of clay within a sample greatly

affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil. This governs

the ability of the soil to absorb cations and to retain moisture and

influences shrink-swell potential, permeability, plasticity, the ease

of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and type

of clay within a soil also affect tillage and earth-moving operations.

Also included in TABLE 22 is the moist bulk density or the weight

of soil (ovendry) per unit vol ume. Volume is measured when the soil

is at field moisture capacity, that is, the moisture content at one

third bar moisture tension. Weight is determined after drying the

soil at 105 degrees Celsius. In this table, the estimated moist bulk

density of each major soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic
centimeter (g/@m') of soil material that is less than two millimeters

in diameter.' Bulk density data are used to compute shrink-swell

potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and other soil

properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space

available for water and roots. A bulk density of more than 1.6 g/cm'

can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist bulk density

is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter,

and soil structure.

Permeability, a soil property that affects the behavior of a soil

as a re tent ion/de tent ion pond function, refers to the ability of a

soil to transmit water, air or other elements. The estimates of vertical

230
permeability included in TABLE 22 indicate the rate of downward movement

of water when the soil is saturated. They are based on soil

characteristics observed in the field, particular structure, porosity,

and texture. Permeability is considered in the design of soil drainage

systems, septic tank absorption fields, and construction where the

rate of water movement under saturated conditions affects behavior.

Another physical property of soil is its available water capacity.

TABLE 23 refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of

storing for use by plants. The capacity for water stor

age is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each major

soil layer. The capacity varies, depending on soil properties that

affect the retention of water and the depth of the root zone. The

most important properties affecting water capacity are the content

of organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil structure.

Available water capacity is an important factor in the selection of

plants or crops to be grown, as well as in the design and managment

of irrigation; systems. Available water capacity is not an estimate

of the quanity of water actually available to plants at any given time.

Soil react@ion, a chemical property of the soil, is a measure of

acidity or alkalinity and is expressed as a range in pH values. The

pH for each soil layer is given in TABLE 23. The range in pH of each

major horizon Js based on the results of many field tests. For

many soils, values have been verified by laboratory analysis. Soil

reaction is important in selecting crops and other plants, in evaluating

soil amendments for fertility and stabilization, and in determining

the risk of corrosion.

231

INFRASTRUCTURE

Soil properties create limitations on other soil applications such

as their use as infrastructure both as a construction material and

as a construction site.

Building Site Development - TABLES 24 through 29 (Table 10 of the

Soil Survey) indicate the degree and type of soil limitations for use

as a site for development for: shallow excavations, dwellings with

and without basements, small commercial -buildings, local roads and

streets, and lawns and landscaping. The limitations for application

as a site for development considered are:

SLIGHT - Soil properties and site features are generally favorable
for the indicated use and limitations are minor and easily
overcome.

MODERATE - Soil properties or site features are not favorable for
the indicated use and special planning design, or maintenance
is needed to overcome or minimize the limitations.

Soil limitations for use in shallow excavations are shown in TABLE

24, and include trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of five or

six feet for basements, graves, utility lines, open ditches, and other

purposes. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features,

and observed performance of the soils. The ease of digging, filling,

and compacting is affected by the depth to a hardpan layer, stone

content, soil texture, and slope. The time of year that excavations

can be made is affected by the depth to a seasonal high water table

and the susceptibility of the soil to flooding. The resistance of

the excavation walls or banks to sloughing or caving is affected by

soil texture and the depth to water table.

232

Dwellings and small commercial buildings are structures built on

shallow foundations on undisturbed soil. The load limit for small

commercial buildings is the same as that for single family dwellings

with basements, and for dwellings without basements. The ratings for

dwellings without basements are shown in TABLE 25, for dwellings with

basements in TABLE 26, and for small commercial buildings in TABLE

27. These ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and

observed performance of the soils. A high water table, flooding,

shrink-swell potential, and organic layers can cause the movement of

footings. A high water table, depth to a hardpan layer, large stones,

and flooding affect the ease of excavation and construction. Landscaping

and grading that require cut and fill of more than five to six feet

are not considered.

Soil limitations for local roads and streets are listed in TABLE

28. Local roads and streets have an all weather surface and carry

automobile and light tr uck traffic all year. They have a subgrade

of cut or fi..ll soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or

stabilized soil material, and a flexible or rigid surface. Cut and

fill ork is generally limited to less than six feet. The ratings
are ba'sed on soil properties, site features, and observed performance

of the soils. Depth to a hardpan layer, a high water table, flooding,

large stones, and slope affect the ease of excavating and grading.

Soil strength (as inferred from the engineering classification of the

soil given in the SCS Soil Survey), shrink-swell potential, and depth

to a high water table affect the traffic supporting capacity.

Soil limitations for lawns and landscaping are given in TABLE 29.

Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees

and shrubs can be established and maintained. The ratings are based

233
on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the

soils. Soil reaction, a high water table, depth to a hardpan layer,

the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches., and the content

of salts, sodium, and sulfidic materials affect plant growth. Flooding,

wetness, slope, stoniness, and the amount of sand, clay, or organic

matter in the surface layer affect trafficability after vegetation

is established.

Construction Materials - Table 12 -of the Soil Survey gives

information about the usefulness of a soil as a source of construction

material. This information is given in TABLES 30 through 32. The

soils are rated good, fair, or poor as a source of roadfill and topsoil.

They are rated as a probable or improbable source of sand and gravel.

The ratings are based on soil properties and site features that affect

the removal and use of the soil as construction material. Normal

compaction, minor processing, and other standard construction practices

are assumed. Each soil is evaluated to a depth of five or six feet.

Roadfill is, soil material that is excavated in one place and used

for road emba@kments in another location. In TABLE 30, the soils are

rated as a source of roadfill for low embankments, generally less than

six feet high and less exacting in design than higher embankments.

The ratings are for soil material below the surface layer to a depth

of five or six feet. It is assumed that soil layers will be mixed

during excavating and spreading. The ratings are based on soil

properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. The

thickness of suitable material is a major consideration. The ease

of excavation is affected by large stones, a high water table, and

slope. How well the soil performs in place after it has been compacted

234

and drained is determined by its strength and shrink-swell potential.

Soils rated good contain significant amounts of sand or gravel or

both. They have at least five feet of suitable material, low

shrink-swell potential, none or few stones, slopes of fifteen percent

or less and a depth to water table equal to or greater than three feet.

Soils rated fair are more than 35 percent silt and clay size particles

and have a plasticity index of less than ten. They have moderate

shrink-swell potential, slopes of 15 to.- 25 percent, many stones, and

a depth to water table from one to three feet.

Soils rated y2or have a plasticity index of more than ten, a high

shrink-swell potential, many stones, spot slopes of more than 25 percent.

They are wet and the depth to the water table is less than one foot.

They may have layers of suitable material, but the material is less

than three feet thick.

Sand and gravel are natural aggregates suitable for commercial use

with minimum processing. Only the probability of finding material

in suitable quantity is evaluated. These probabilities are listed

in TABLE 31. The suitability of the material for specific purposes

is not evaluated, nor are factors that affect excavation of the material.

The properties used to evaluate the soil as a source of sand or gravel

are gradation of grain sizes, the thickness of suitable material, and

the content of rock fragments.

A soil rated as a probable source has a layer of clean sand or gravel

or a layer of sand or gravel that is up to twelve percent silty fines.

This material must be at least three feet thick and less than 50 percent

by weight of large stones. All other soils are rated as an improbable

source.

Topsoil is used to cover an area so that vegetation can be established

235

and maintained. The upper 40 inches of a soil is evaluated for use

as topsoil. Also evaluated is the reclamation potential of the borrow

area.

Plant growth is affected by toxic material and by such properties

as soil reaction, available water capacity, and fertility. The ease

of excavating, loading conditions, and spreading is affected by rock

fragments, slope, depth to water table, soil texture, and thickness

of suitable material. Reclamation of the - borrow area is affected by

slope, depth to water table conditions, rock fragments, bedrock, and

toxic material.

Soils rated good in TABLE 32 have brittle loamy material to a depth

of at least 4 0 inches. They are free of stones, have little or no

gravel, and have slopes of less than eight percent. They are low in

content of soluble salts, are naturally fertile or respond well to

fertilizer, and are not so wet that excavation is difficult.

Soils rated fair are sandy soils, loamy soils with a relatively

high content of clay, soils with only 20 to 40 inches of suitable

material; or soils that have an appreciable amount of gravel, stones,

or soluble sa'l ts; or soils that have slopes of eight to fifteen percent.

The soils are not so wet that excavation is difficult.

Soils rated poor are very sandy or clayey, have less than twenty

inches of suitable material, a large amount of gravel, stones, or soluble

salts; have slopes of more than fifteen -percent, or a seasonal water

table at or near the surface.

The surface layer of most soils is generally preferred for topsoil

because of its organic matter content. Organic matter greatly increases

the absorption and retention of moisture and nutrients for plant growth.

2. AREAS WHERE SOILS ARE EASILY ERODIBLE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
ARE ESPECIALLY NEEDED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFFSITE

Erosion is the removal of rock or soil by a transporting agent,

such as wind or water. Types of erosion are sheet erosion, rill erosion,

and wind erosion. Sheet erosion and rill erosion are uncommon in St.

Johns County because of the sandy and level nature of most areas.

Erosion from rapid run-off takes place only during heavy rains on bare

soils that have short, steep slopes. During heavy rains, sheet and

rill erosion originate when the force of -iaindrops striking and loosening

the soil particles enables the soil to be transported downstream. Sheet

erosion begins when run-off begins to carry particles that were detached

by raindrops. Surface flow soon establishes paths. Some, . of these

paths become small eroding channels or rills. Water flowing through

rills readily detaches soil from the sides and. bottoms of the flow

path, resulting in rill erosion.

Wind erosion is a major hazard on the sandy and organic soils.

Wind erosion becomes important in unprotected cropped areas when winds

are strong and.' the soils are dry and bare of vegetation and surface

mulch. Maintaining a plant or a surface mulch minimizes dust storms.

Field windbreaks are effective in reducing wind erosion and crop damage

when planted at right angles to the prevailing winds and at specific

interval spacing. Table 15 of the Soil Survey shows wind erodibility

groups that of soils with similar properties affecting their resistance

to wind erosion in cultivated areas. These groups indicate the

susceptibility of soil to wind erosion and the amount of soil lost.

Soils are grouped according to the following distinctions:

1. Sands, coarse sands, fine sands and very fine sands. These
soils are generally not suitable for crops. They are extremely
erodible, and vegetation is difficult to establish.

236

237
2. Loamy sands, loamy fine sands, and loamy very fine sands. These
soils are very highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive
measures to control wind erosion are used.

3. Sandy loams, coarse sandy loams, fine sandy loams and very fine
sandy loams. These soils are highly erodible. Crops can be
grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used.

4L. Calcareous loamy soils that are less than 25 percent clay and
more than five percent finely divided calcium carbonate. These
soils are erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures
to control wind erosion are used.

4. Clays, silty clays, clay loams, and silty clay loams that are
more than 35 percent clay. These soils are moderately erodible.
Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used.

5. Loamy soils that are less than 18 percent clay and less than
five percent finely divided calcium carbonate and sandy clay
loams and sandy clays that are less than five percent finely
divided calcium carbonate. These soils are slightly erodible.
Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used.

6. Loamy soils that are 18 to 35 percent clay and less than five
percent finely divided calcium carbonate, except silty clay
loams. These soils are very slightly erodible. Crops can easily
be grown.

7. Silty clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay and less
than five percent finely divided calcium carbonate. These soils
are very slightly erodible. Crops can easily be grown.

8. Stony or gravelly soils and other soils not subject to wind
erosion..

Areas that are easily erodible are of greatest concern in St.

Johns County.,, Easily erodible areas include potentially highly erodible

soils, cultivated soils, and soils stripped of vegetation.

Certain soils are classified as potentially highly erodible soils

by the Soil Conservation Service due to characteristics of steep slope,

particle size, compaction, permeability, and ground cover. The

potentially highly erodible soils in St. Johns County are:

FRIPP of the Fripp-Satellite Complex, #31.

PITS #38.

Some special consideration also goes to these potentially moderately

238

erodible soils:

FLORIDANA - fine sand #62.

PLACID - fine sand #63.

This is due to the steep slope characteristic of these soils,

and that their erodibility is increased when the soil is not vegetated.

The location of these soils is shown in FIGURE 9. Although these

Floridana and Placid soils do not occur in this project area they are

of importance on a county wide basis. The characteristic slope for

a Fripp soil is eight to fifteen percent and the characterisitic slope

for a Pits soil is one to eight percent. The most effective method

of controlling the erodibility of these soils is to keep them vegetated.

Best management practices for Pits soils should include gentle slopes

and vegetation. Dunes areas, where Fripp is found, should be vegetated

and protected.

Erosion control factors for cultivated soils have been established

by the Soil Survey. Erosion factors K and T are given for each soil

in TABLE 33, from Table 15 of the Soil Survey.

Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet

and rill erosion by water. Factor K is used to predict the average

annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre

per year. The estimates are based primarily on the percentage of silt,

sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and permeability. Values

of K range from 0.05 to 0.69. The higher the value the more susceptible

the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water.

Erosion factor T, or soil loss tolerance is an estimate of the

maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind or water that can

occur without affecting the long-term productivity of soil and avoiding

239
such problems as severe rilling and nutrient losses. The T factor

is derived from the rate at which topsoil forms. One inch of topsoil

takes about 30 years to form from subsoil material. Subsoil forms

from the parent material even more slowly. Since one inch of soil

from one acre weighs about 150 tons, many conservationists believe

that erosion should be held at or below five tons per acre per year

on most deep soils. At this rate, it would take 33 years to loose

one inch of soil; therefore, soil is being formed nearly as fast as

it is lost. The T factor, however, does not consider other damage

from erosion, such as water pollution from sediment and associated

nutrients and pesticides.

Overall, erosion rates depend mainly on the characteristics of

three interacting factors:

1. The erosive potential of rainstorms.

2. The protection provided by ground cover.

3. The resistance of the soil to erosion.

The force,s and energy that cause erosion result from impacting

waterdrops caused by rainfall and sprinkle irrigation, and run-off

water from rainfall and irrigation. Plant canopy and ground cover

reduce these forces and the erosivity of water. Soil properties

determine the resistance of soil particles to the erosive energy that

remains. The goals of erosion control practices is to reduce energy

and/or increase the erosive resistance property of a soil. Therefore,

if care is taken to provide proper erosion control and enforcement,

the effects of erosion can be kept to a minimum.

APPENDIX C

DESCRIPTION OF GIS COVERAGES

AERIAL BOUNDARIES COVERAGE: The state plane feet coordinates of
the aerial corners were obtained from the state plane feet
grid on the mylar aerials and entered into the GIS system
manually. These boundaries are available in CM207>AERIALS.

BASIN COVERAGE: The drainage basins were delineated on blue line
copies of the topographic mylar aerials (one inch equal 200
feet) obtained from Continental Aerial Surveys, Inc. Alcoa,
Tennessee. The state plane feet coordinates were then
interpolated from the coordinate grids on the aerials. These.
coordinate points were then manually entered via keyboard
into the GIS as the CM207>PROJCOV>BASINS coverage.

CULVERTS COVERAGE: The culverts were located -using the aerial
photographs (one inch equals 200 feet) of the project area
and by using onsite investigations. The location of each culvert
was determined by interpolating the state plane feet coordinates
and entering them manually into the GIS system. The culverts
and their characteristics are available in the
CM207>PROJCOV>CULVERTS.

FLOODWAYS COVERAGE: Silverslick (similar to mylar) FEMA Floodway
and Firm maps were obtained. The scale of these maps varies
with the,,most prevalent scale being one inch equals 500 feet.
Using roa d intersections as a reference to mark the state
plane feet coordinates these maps were digitized, cleaned,
and edgematched in as the CM207>PROJCOV>FLOODWAYS coverage.

LAND USE COVERAGE: SPOT satellite imagery was taken of the county,
and is still being coded and ground truthed. In combination
with the St. Johns County Planning and Zoning Department's
work on the comprehensive plan with Prosser, Hallock & Kristoff,
Inc. (PHK) of Jacksonville, Florida half sheets of zoning
(scale: one inch equals 400 feet) and aerial photographs (scale:
one inch equals 200 feet) were used to make a planimetric
map (scale: 1:100,000). This plainimetric map was then digitized
by Landmark Technologies, Inc., of Jacksonville, Florida and
plotted on mylar at a scale of 1:24,000 (one inch equals 2,000
feet). This mylar land use map was then hand digitized into
the county's GIS using quadrangle corners as reference marks.
The cleaned and edited version of this map is the "temporary"
CM207>PROJCOV>LANDUSE coverage. At the completion of Contract

240

241

No. 87-095.01 between the county's Planning and Zoning
Department and PHK, the existing land use map will be read
into the county's GIS.

ROADS, HYDROLOGY, RAILROAD, and STATE PLANE FEET COVERAGES: The
1:100,000 scale Digital Line Graph (DLG) data from the USGS
Quadrangle sheets was read into the county's GIS via magnetic
tape. This information is available in the MAP>SJQUADS
directory.

SEPTIC, STP, and SEWER SERVICE AREAS COVERAGE: These areas were
located using information from the St. Johns County
Environmental Health Department, coordinated with aerial
photographs (scale: one inch equals 200 feet) and site
inspections. Locations were determined by interpolating x
and y coordinates from the state *plane coordinates on the
mylar aerial photographs. These coordinates were then entered
via the terminal into county's GIS. The areas of high density
septic systems are available in the CM207>PROJCOV>SEPTIC
coverage.

SOILS COVERAGE: The SCS furnished the original aerial photographs
and original mylar soil maps (scale: 1:20,000) that were used
to publish the "Soil Survey of St. Johns County, Florida"
(SCS,1983). Photographic reduction (83.3333%) of these mylar
soil maps using a computer assisted camera was done by Southside
Blueprint Service, Inc., of Jacksonville, Florida. Mylar
soil maps 8.5" X 12.5" were produced (scale: 1:24,000). Bob
Baldwin (a soil scientist with the SCS who worked on the
original soil survey for St. Johns County) hand transcribed
the soil boundaries from these 8.5" X 12.5" sheets onto (scale-
1:24,000) quadrangle size mylar sheets. These sheets were
based on 'the topography of the USGS mylar Quadrangle sheets.
Mylar quadrangle size soil maps with soil boundaries only
were scanned and digitized in AutoCad format onto floppy disk
by Tampa,, Reprographics & Supply, of Tampa, Florida. AutoCad
DWG (drawing) format data was translated into ARC/INFO format
and read onto magnetic tape using translation software at
the SJRWMD. This magnetic tape was then loaded into the GIS.
Some cleaning and editing was done to the coverage, and the
soil numbers were edited manually. The soil numbers relate
to the INFO data base of data from the SCS Soil Survey. The
soils are available in the CM207>SOILS coverage.

APPENDIX D

LIST OF CONTACTED AGENCIES

Alachua County Regional Information Center
GEOMAX Project - Stanley Latimer (904) 376-1232
- Beth Romano

Continental Aerial Surveys, Inc., Alcoa, Tennessee and Barton, Florida
Contract Manager - Dean Epling (800) 233-7138
Civil Engineer - Steven L. Howard, P.E.
AUTOCAD - Allen Henderson

Department of Environmental Regulation, Tallahasse, Florida
Office of Coastal Management - Lou Burney (904) 488-4805
- Fred Calder

Department of Environmental Regulation - Office of Coastal Management
Project Manager James W. Stoutamire (904) 488-4805

Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
Division of Health, Mosquito Control
- Hampton Mickler (904) 471-3107
- Freddie Thomas

Department of Natural Resources - Bureau of Marine Research
- Ken Haddad (813) 896-8626
- Gail McGarry

Division of Plant Industries
Dan Phelps (904) 372-3505

Federal Emergency Management Agency
National Office - Dan Colter (202) 646-2757
- Maynard Long
- James Walke

Regional Director - Mary Anne Lyle (404) 853-4432

Florida Department of Transportation
Bureau of Topographic Mapping - Donald Merkel (904) 488-2168
- Allen Shopmeyer

Division of Planning and Programs - Dave Lynch (904) 829-5697
- Hugh Smith

Florida Department of State
- Phyllis Desmore (904) 488-3684

242

243

Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission
Guana State Park Game Warden Marc Epstein (904) 797-0216
Division of Wildlife - Don Wood (904) 488-3831
Office of Environmental Services - Randy S. Kautz (904) 488-6661

Florida Natural Areas Inventory
- Jim Muller (904) 224-8207
- Katy NeSmith

Geographic Information System
Keith Houseman (713) 894-0702

Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.
- Richard Diaz, Jr., P.E. (813) 888-7465
- Nelson Allen (301) 345-7924
- Bea Chisholm
- Faith Diehl
- Albert Romano
- Rhonda Taylor

Jones Edmunds & Associates
Dave Keough (904) 377-5821

Landmark Technologies, Inc.
- Bud Goodrick (904) 730-0321
Bill Shelly, V.P.
Manatee County - Dale Friedley (813) 748-8208
Mid Continent Mapping Center, USGS (314) 341-0851

Prosser, Hallock & Kristoff, Inc.
Michael G. Bell (904) 739-3655
Harry Lerner

Soil Conservation Service
Florida Cooperative Extension Service, St. Johns County
Jim Dilbeck (904) 824-8131
Wade Hurt (904) 377-1092
Geographic Information Specialist Coordinator
William Puckett (904) 377-1092
Soil Scientist - Lea Readle (904) 437-3151
- Bob Baldwin
- Gene Bertine (904) 692-1804
- William Register
- Winston Tooke (904) 328-6522

St. Johns County
Department of Environmental Health - Phil Jordan (904) 824-4372
- George Sigman
- Cynthia Small

244

St. Johns County Engineering Department
DER Grant Project Manager - Sharon E. Holmes, P.E. (904) 824-8131
DER Grant Project Coordinator - Bob Riches
Co-op Engineering Student - John Bearce
- Jean Gamble
Office Specialist - Diane K. Boyce
- Claudia Pizzo

St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department
- Don Bement (904) 824-8131
- Andy Campbell

St. Johns County Data Processing
Director of Data Processing - Ludy Beaver (904) 824-8131
Systems Analyst - Mark Dearing

St. Johns River Water Management District
Director of Water Resources - Barbara Vegara
Permits Department - Katie Purcel (904) 328-8321
Director of Records - Dannise Kemp
Quality Stations - John Hendrexson
Environmental Sciences Division - Palmer D. Kinser, Jr.
Geographic Information Specialist- Armando Calabello
- Bob Klein
Geographic Information Specialist Marvin M. Williams
Stream Data Records - Charles Tai
Engineering - Armondo Calabello
Technical Services - Bill Osborn
John Denton

Engineering Technician - Chuck Blum (904) 328-8321
Jacksonville Office - James Ray (904) 730-6270

State of Floirda Bureau of Land Management
Survey and,Mapping - Ronnie Taylor (904) 488-2427

Tampa Reprographic & Supply
Laser Cad Division - Ford Bond (813) 873-1965
- Bob Prieto (813) 874-7711
- Dick Rice (813) 874-7711

.U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Jacksonville , Florida - James E. Boone, Jr. P.E. (904)791-1666
- Charles Vigh (904) 791-1666
U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service
Wetlands Inventory for St. Johns County
- Michael.-M * Bentizien, Ph.D (904) 791-2580
- Becky Stanely

U.S. Geological Survey
Jacksonville - John Coffin (904) 398-2121
- Eugene Hayes
- Mike Holmes
- Leel Knowles
- Rick Speckler
Stream Gage Information - Abe Jennette

245
University of Florida Department of Urban & Regional Planning
Automate Resource Mapping & analysis Systems Integration
Dr. John F. Alexander (904) 393-0797
James L. Hatchitt

REFERENCES

Applicant's Handbook Management and Storage of Surface Waters.
Palatka, FL: St. Johns River Water Management District,
December 7, 1983.

Applicant's Handbook Management and Storage of Surface
Waters.Palatka, FL: St. Johns River Water Management District,
1988.

Brown, David P., James A. Miller, and Eugene C. Hayes. Hydrogeologic
Data from a Test Well near Ponte Vedra, Northeast St. Johns
County, Florida. Tallahasse, FL: U.S. Geological Survey,
1986.

Central Florida Water Conservation Study, St.Johns, Putnam, and
Flagler Counties, Florida. Gainesville, FL: U. S. Department
of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1987.

Claiborne, Maude, Teresa L. Embry, Nevin D. Hoy, Deborah H. Weldon,
and Twilla D. Wilson. Bibliography of U.S. Geological Survey
Reports on the Water Resources of Florida, 1886-1986. 4th
ed. Tallahassee, FL: U.S. Geological Survey, 1987.

Cowardin, Virginia, Carter Lewis M., Francis C. Colet, and Edward
T. LaRoe. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats
of the :United States. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department
the Inte'rior Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Biological
Services, December, 1979.
Department of 'Defense Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army.
33 CFR Pa rts 320 through 330 Regulatory Programs of the Corps
of Engineers Final Rule. November 13, 1986.

Department of Environmental Regulation. Drinking Water Quality
Quick Look Report. February 17, 1988.
Department of Natural Resources Division of Recreation and Parks
Bureau of Land and Aquatic Resource Management. Aquatic
Preserves. 1987.

Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. America's
Endangered Wetlands. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984.

Element Occurrence Record. Tallahasse, FL: Florida National Areas
Inventory, 1988.

Environmental Protection Board. Water Quality Attainment Plan.
February 13, 1987.

246

247
Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Study St.
Johns County, Florida Unincorporated Areas. September 18,
1985.

Federal Water Pollution Control Act, As Amended by the Clean Water
Act of 1977. Washington, D.C.: The Bureau of National Affairs,
Inc., March 23, 1987.

Florida Department of Natural Resources. Boater's Guide to Manatees:
The Gentle Giants. Miami, FL: Florida Power and Light Company,
1982.

Florida Department of Transportation State Topographic Bureau
Thematic Mapping Section. Florida Lane Use, Cover and Forms
Classification System. 2d ed. September, 1985.

Georgia Emergency Management Agency, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District.
Storm Surge Atlas for Northeast Florida (Nassau, Duval, and
St. Johns Counties). Jacksonville, FL: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, June 1988.

Hand, Joe, Victoria Tauxe, and John Watts. 1986 Florida Water
Quality Assessment. Water Quality Monitoring and Quality
Assurance Section Bureau of Water Quality Management
Division of Environmental Programs, June 1986.

HEC-1 Flood Hydrograph Package Users Manual. Davis, CA: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, September
1981.

HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles Users Manual. Davis, CA: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Water Resources
Support Center, January 1981.

Jenab, S. Abe, Ph.D.,P.E., Donthamsetti V. Rao Ph.D.,P.E., and
David Clapp. Rainfall Analysis for Northeast Florida Part
II: Summary of Monthly and Annual Rainfall Data. Palatka,
FL: Division of Engineering Department of Water Resources
St. Johns River Water Management District, July 1986.

National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils U.S. Department of
Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Hydric Soils of the
State of Florida 1985. October 1985.

1988 Regional Wetland Policy & Permitting Workshops. Jacksonville,
FL: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1988.

Northeast Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan. Jacksonville,
FL: Northeast Florida Regional Planning Council, July 1,
1987.

Nunnally, Nelson R., and F. Douglas Shields. Incorporation of
Environmental Features in Flood Control Channel Projects.
Vicksburg, MS: Department of the Army Waterways Experiment
Station, Corps of Engineers, May 1985.

248

Pellerin, Joan V. Sources and Samples of St. Johns River Water
Management District Data Pertinent to the State Comprehensive
Planning Process. Palatka, FL: Office of Planning and
Coordination, St. Johns River Water Management District, October
21, 1986.

Plummer, Charles C., and David McGeary. Physical Geology. 4th
ed. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Publishers, 1988.

Rainfall Frequency Atlas of Alabama, Florida, Georgia and South
Carolina for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return
Periods from 1 to 100 Years. Gainesville, FL:U.S. Department
of Agriculture.Soil Conservation Service, 1978.

Rao, Donthamsetti, V., and David Clapp. Rainfall Analysis for
Northeast Florida Part 1: 24 Hour to .10 Day Maximum Rainfall
Data. Palatka, FL: Division of 'Engineering Department of
Water Resources St. Johns River Water Management District,
June 1986.

Reed, Porter, B., Jr. Wetland Plants of the State of Florida 1986.
St. Petersburg, FL: National Wetlands Inventory U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, May 1986.

Station Number 02246900 Moultrie Creek at State Highway 207 NR
St. Augustine, Florida - Gage Height (feet above datum) Water
Yearoctober 1968 to September 1987. Orlando, FL: U.S.
Department of the Interior Geological Survey, 1988.

Station Number 02246900 Moultrie Creek at State Highway 207 NR
St. Augustine, F lor ida-Di s charge, in Cubic Feet per Second,
Water Year October 1961 to September 1987. Orlando, FL: U.S.
Department of the Interior Geological Survey, 1988.

St. Johns Coun ty Administration. North St. Johns County Stormwater
Management Study Draft Report. Tampa, FL: Seaburn and
Robertson, Inc., July 1986.

Suphunvorranop, Thirask. Technical Publication No. SJ 85-5, A
Guide to SCS Runoff Procedures. Palatka, FL: Department
of Water Resources St. Johns River Water Management District,
July 1985.

Surface Water Quality In Areas of Intensive Agriculture Putnam
County, Florida. Palatka, FL: Putnam Soil and Water Conservation
District. District.

26 Ecological Communities of Florida. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service, 1985; reprint, Florida Chapter
Soil Conservation Society of America, March 1987.

U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation, and Florida Department of Natural Resources. State
of Florida Joint Application for Permit-Dredge-Fill-Structures.

249
U. S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Soil
Survey Legend St. Johns County. October, 1987.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Soil
Survey of St.Johns County, Florida. October 1983.

U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration National Oceanic Survey National Geodetic
Survey. Horizontal and Vertical Control Data. 1973.

U.S. Department of Interior Geological Survey Water Resources-Division
Expanded Rating Table. February 27, 1987. @

U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations. Low-Flow
Frequency Data for Selected Stream-Gaging Stations In Florida.
1981.

U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations. Technique
for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods on Natural-Flow
Streams in Florida. 179-2.

Van Meter, Victoria Brook. Florida's Sea Turtles. Miami, FL:
Florida Power & Light Company, 1983; reprint, 1986.

Florida's Wood Storks. Miami, FL: Florida Power
& Light Company, 1985.

Weber, Lynn A., Beth M. Romano, Robert L. Hofman, Gabriel Coch
Calvo. GFIS: Applications for Community Planning.
Gainesville, FL: University of Florida College of Architecture
Department of Urban and Regional Planning Geo-Facilities
Planning and Information Research Center, September 1987.
Winneberger, j8hn Timothy, Ph.D. 'Septic-Tank Practices Critique
and Suggestions for Improvements. Miami, FL: General
Development Utilities, Inc., November 1977.

Wood, Don A., Endangered Species Coordinator, comp. Official Lists
of Endangered and Potentially Endangered Fauna and Flora
in Florida. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission,
July 1, 1987.

NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CTR LIBRARY

3 6668 14111359 9