Coastal Energy Impact Program Ventura County : Rincon seawall access

[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PROGRAM

VENTURA COUNTY

RINCON SEAWALL ACCESS

RINCON SEAWALL'

Ventura County

1. SUBAWARDEE: County of Ventura

AWARD: $3,000

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The project involves the construction of two concrete step ramps with pipe

handrail s from the seawal I to the state-owned beach. The step ramps will

be an addition to the seawall. No additional facilities will be required

as a result,of the construction, and no additional land needs to be

acquired.

3. PROJECT LOCATION

The project is located along the seawalls at the Old Rincon Highway between

the beach community of Seacliff and Solimar.Beach, a distance of 3 miles,

The ramps are to be located at each of the seawal-ls protecting the highway.

see attached maps, Exhibits 1A, 1B, and 1C.

4. PROJECT DESIGN The design of the ramps includes concrete steps

a.pproxi,mately six feet wide. Handrails. of standard -weight galvanized pipe

extending on either side of the steps. The steps are anchored in concrete

to a depth of four feet into the sand at the base and eighteen i nches at

the head of the stairs at the roadway shoulder. See attached blueprints,

Exhibit 2.

5. PROJECT PURPOSE

The purpose of constructing the step ramps is to provide safe access to the

beach. Presently, acces s to the beach is limited to six ladders over the

3 mile long.seawall or down the rip-rap adjacent to the seawalls. It is

foreseeable that someone may be seriously injured if this practice

continues.

6. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

The steps would be an addition to the seawall adjacent to theOld Rincon

Highway, a busy two-lane road with parking along its perimeter. Neither

residential nor commercial development exists in the vicinity. Below the

seawall extends a broad, sandy beachbacked by rip-rap.

7. PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The proposed project may have the following environmental impacts:

1) There will be minor short term negative impact during construction of

the steps. The-machinery to mix the concrete will. create some noise

and access over the riprap to the beach will be restricted during

construction,

.2) There may be anincrease in litter in the area due to the increased.

number of visitors who would utilize the beach.

3) There may be some increase in traffic,

4) Exposure of people and property to earthquakes is possible, as the

project is in a region of general seismic activity.

The County of Ventura,.in complying with the California Environmental

Qual1ty Act,,. has, filed and received a. categorical exempt-ion based on the

minimal nature of the propsed improvements and their environmental impacts.

See attached Notice of Exemptions, Exhibit 3.

8. WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN CONSIDERATIONS

Th'e project is not located in a wetland or a 100 year floodplain.

9. HISTORIC CONSIDERATIONS

The project site for the Rincon Beach Accessway has no known, archaelogical

sites located within its borders. However, the site is located within a

general area of archaeological sensitivity, and thus there could be a,

possibility that archaeological remains would be found. during construction.

The University of California at Los Angeles, Regional Office of the

California Archaeological Site Survey has.recommended that any buried site

discovered during construction be excavated by a qualified archaeologist

folllowing standard archaeological methods. This mitigation measure will

be incorporated into the contract by providing funds for an archaeologist.

should a finding occur. See attached archaeological report and letter from

Office of.Historic PreservationExhibit 4A and 4B.

10. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

1) No Project

The most obvious alternative would be to not build the stairways.,

Were this to be the case, motorists would nevertheless continue to

stop along the seawall because of the view and because of the ample

parking. Many of these people would continue to enter the beach by

climbing over the wall or down the rip-rap, and some of these persons

may be injured doing so (exposing the County to costly lawsuits.)

Lack of stairways would also have the general effect of deterring the

public from using a beach that might otherwise be safely opened to

them.

2) Prohibit Parking on Highway near Seawall

Another alternative would be to not allow the public to park adjacent

to the beach in order to.prevent motorists from having the opportunity

to climb over the seawall. or down the rip-rap. This solution may

lower the number of injuries, but it will not solve the more basic.,.,

problem of providing the public with an adequate level of

recreational opportunities in the California Coastal Zone. 'It

would,- in fact,, have the opposite effect of providing fewer

opportunites to enjoy the coast. In addition, it would constitute

economic waste because the Old Rincon Highway was recently improved in

order to provide such -parking spaces.

3) Install Ladders

Another alternative would be to install additional ladders down the

seawall rather than construct stairways. This possiblity provides

access, but only for those capable of climbing up and down the

ladders. The very young, the old, and.the infi.rm Would be excluded

from the beach.

4) Install Step Ramps

The proposed project involves the installation of two step ramps.

These ramps will provide safe access to the beach in an area where

there are existing parking facilities. In addition, this coastal

access will help to ease pressures on other accessways in Ventura

County.

11. PUBLIC MEETINGS-AND/OR VIEWS OF INTERESTED PARTIES

The resolution approving the construction of two stairways at Rincon Beach

was debated and ultimately approved at a public meeting of the Board of

Supervisors of Ventura County on April 22, 1980. The project was also open

to public discussion at the State Coastal Conservancy meeting in Los

Angeles on July 10, 19.80. The County's permit application was heard at a.

public hearing before the State Coastal Commission, December 3, 1980.

12. MITIGATING MEASURES

The proposed project will involve only the construction of two step ramps

so as not to alter the undeveloped character of thearea. The ramps

themselves will have a low profile so as.not to hamper the view of the
ocean from the highway, and the color of the ramps.will blend with that of

the rip-rap.

13. AGENCIES CONSULTED

1) State Coastal Conservancy

2) California Coastal Commission

3) State Historic Preservation Office

4) County of Ventura Property Administration Agency.

5) County Environmental Resource Agency

6) County Board of@ Supervisors

7) California Conservation Corps

.14. COST ESTIMATE-

The estimate of cost for the two step ramps as of December 1980 is as

follows:

Material at $1,500 each $ 3,000
'Labor 11.%000*

..b TOTAL COST $ 3,000.
*Labor to be proAded by the California Conservation Corps at no cost to
the County. See Conservation Corp agreement, Exhibit 5.

15- -TITLE INSURANCE

Title to the highway was granted to the County by the State Department of.

Transportation as of February 1979. See title documents, Exhibit 6.

16. PERMITS

The Rincon stepramp project has received approval from the Coastal,

Commission on December 3, 1980. Condition -1 on, - page: 2 of E@KM-it 7 refers
to the expected transfer of a portio -of the relinqui-s-hed CalTr4ns riqht,of@
n
way back to CalTrans; however i uch arran
in any s -gement the County will reserve
all rights and interests necessary to operation and maintenance of -the Rincon
steps accessway. See Attached permi t s,,'Exhib i@t -7A'and 7B

EXHIBIT I A

C-P

-P L0CKVi0CD
M A Ffll CG;"A

-7t-
VALLty
JP

ON
1,3 MER L.

JA v

FILLIAORE-
CA 53 TA s ve

FOSTER
%
PAPA
Lo tj ctj

lp.
AR
VENTUPA- 0
S A tM
SIMI
S J"-r;s6
c SUSAN
NYELAND
EL
IA 0'NT LV 0
seawalls

cl,
oj

-N,

POPT

@e6
AP -h Al
SOLROM CITIT

o 1

MILES

E DISTRICTS 1 (B
SENAT 11% -Ty
VENTURA COUt)
PREP!@rlt:[) BY
CQIJ:-ITY 0;: PWL-lc Y/oRKs
51JRVEY E\

A %

Ca w

><
LLJ %1Z
%
%,.,I do
00 It %
40

So AA
4s

01 A
A

it,kce4
ol do'

Nk
C E-A IV
P AGI

..OVERNIGHT PA R K I N 0

'N
0 OVERNIGHT PAR.k.1 NG.111111111.111111111.
-NO PARKINC
project
limit

'op
10 do
41 4
io oh , I
00
0
00 00 00
A
ol %.0" %
ol
op

10
4,,. Al
40

q 00
, . , @@lrll
'Pool

r-.t
zu FSWY
see.

Jx
00

op
'lop
00
00 .0 op

00
00

00
op op
op

0000. op
00 OR
ow

op
mit
ro Oct
OVERNIGHT 5ARKING
NO OVERNIGHT PARKING

00000
PARKING-.1000000.000
N 0

OM 51

R
NCON SEAWALL
I

RINCON SEAWALL AND RIP-RAP

@'i
.j J,@44 1121

.Oq

$1 5F

77Y

Iq Qq

EXHIBIT. 3 Notice
of Exemption

TO: Secretary for Resources FROM: Robert Laughlin
1416 Ninth Street, Room l3l1 Planning Division
Sacramento, California 95814 Ventura County Environmental
Resource. Agency

County Clerk 800 S. Victoria, Ave
County of Ventura Ventura, California 93009
800 S. Victoria Avenue
Ventura, California 93009

Project Title
Rincon Seawall Step Ramps
Project Location--Specific

Ventura County Old Highway 101 North Coast

P ro j ec t Location City Project Location--County
Unincorporated area north of Ventura Ventura County
Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project
Seawall step ramps will provide safe access down rip-rapped areas
from, highway to the beach

Name of Public Agency Approving Project
County of Ventura
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project
Property Administration Agency
Exempt Status (Check- One)

-Ministerial (Sec- 15073)
Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071 (a))
Emercency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c))
X Cateqorical Exemption. State type and section number:
Class 1 (f)
Reasons whv Project is exempt:
Ramps will provide safe accessways for visitors to the beach
from, the highway

(Contact Person Area Code Telephone Extension
Ginny Morton 805 654-3967
If filed by,applicant:
Attach certified document of exemption finding-
2. Has a notice of exemtion been filed by the,public agency approving
the project? YesX No

Date Received for Filing:
Signature
Administrative Assistant
Title
Property Administration Aqency

EXHIBIT 7A
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
631 Howard Street, San Francisco 94105 - (415) 543-8555

N 0 T 1 C E 0 F I N T ENT T 0 1 S S U E P E R M I T

On December 3, 1980 by an unimous vote the California Coastal

Commission granted to the County of Ventura

Permit A- 307-80 subject to the attached conditions, for development consisting of

construction of two concrete step-ramps across the Rincon Seawall

more specifically described in the application file in the Commission offices.

The development is Within the coastal zone in Ventura County at

along old Rincon Highway between Emma Wood State Beach and Seacliff

The actual development permit is being held in the Commission office until fulfill-
ment of the Special Conditions I , imposed by the Commission.
Once these conditions have been fullfilled, the permit will be issued. For your under-
standing, all the imposed conditions a re attached.

Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission on

MICHAEL FISCHER
Executive Direct or

DEC2 1980
PROPERTY
ADMINSTRATION

The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this notice of the California Coastal
Commission determination on Permit A- 307-80 and fully understands it contents,
including all conditions imposed.

6;804q@e reel

Date Permittee
Please sign and return one copy of this
form to
the Commission office at the above address.

-2-

Permit A- 307-80 is subject to the following conditions

A. Standard Conditions.

1. Assigment of Permit. This permit may not be assigned to another person
except as provided in the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Section 13170.
2. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. Construction authorized by this
permit shall not commence until a copy of this permit, signed by the permittee or
authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of its contents,
is returned to the Commision.
3. Expiration. If construction has not commenced, this permit will expire
two (2) years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application.Appli-
cation for extension of this permit must be made prior to the expiration date.

4. Construction. All construction must occur in accord with the proposal as
set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special conditions set forth
below. Any deviations from the approved plans must be reviewed by the Commission
pursuant to California administrative Code, Title 14, Sections 13164-13168.

5. Interpretation. Interpretation or revisions of the terms or conditions of
this permit must be reviewed by the State Coastal Commission or its Executive
Director. All questions regarding this permit should be addressed to the State
Commission office in San Francisco unless a condition expressly authorizes review
by the Regional Commission or its staff.

B. Special Conditions.

l. Prior to commencement of constrution, applicant shall submit adequate
documentation to the effect that the applicant has entered into contractual
agreement with the holder of clear title, to the property with respect to long-term
maintenance of same. This document is subject to the review and approval. of the
Executive Director of the State coastal Commission.

VEN-001
Form omoM.P 202 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
780-E-766969
DEPAR TMENT OF TRANPORTATION No -------------------------

EXHIBIT 7B
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT

To County of Ventura Los Angeles , California
800 S. Victoria Ave.
Ventura, CA 93009 December 2 1980
Attn: Arthur E. Goulet - - ------------- - -------- ........
Diractor Public Works Agency

Permittee

November 19 80
In compliance with your request of -------------- ---------------------------
to all the terms, conditions and restrictions written below or printed as general or special
provisions on any part of this form and/or attached hereto. EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1981
PERMISSION is HEREBY GRANTED TO provide and maintain parking meter. zone,,
including full responsibility for litter, portable toi1ets, striping
and pavement markings and parking meter zone related signing, at
various locations along the ocean -side of the new segment of State
Route 1 (Rincon Beach) being added by AB 2358 between Seacliff and
Emma Wood State Beach.'. All work shall be in -accordance with the
various terms and conditions of the following documents:

1. Coastal Development Permit A-436-77 dated March 3,1978
authorizing restriping the existing to a two-lane roadway
with two-way bicycle lane and parking.

2. California Coastal Commission Determination of Materiality
of Requested Amendment to Permit A-436-77 (Hearing opened
11-15-77) authorizing the installation of the parking meter
zone, trash receptacles, and portable toilets.

3. California Coastal Commission Execuitive Directors approval
of Item #2 above dated July 26. 1979.

4. Adopted Ordinance #3452 dated August 14, 1979 establishing
the parking meter zone and amending Section 7215 of the'
Ventura County Ordinance Code.
This permit is to be *strictly construed and no work other than that specifically
mentioned above is authorized hereby.
This permit shall be void unless the work herein contemplated shall have been completed
June 30
before ----------------------------------------- -----_------- 19 81
RWN:jk DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAION
oc: VEN VEN HARON

--------------------- - -- - --------------------------- - -- - -- - --------
District Director of Tranportation
R.W. NOAD
By --------------------------------------------- ---------------------

-2-

County Of Ventura 780-E-766969

5. Ventura County Order establishing-traffic control on
Ventura County roads "Order that prima facia, speed limit
..of 40 mile's per hour be established on former State
Route 101 from old P.M. 33.25 (Emma Wood Beach State Park)
to old P.M. 39.30 (Seacliff Interchange)" signed by
Arthur E. Goulet, Road Commissioner, dated 10-1-79.

6. Resolution of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors
dated 11-13-79 establishing parking restrictions within
the parking meter zone.

7. Resolution of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors
dated 11-11-80 establishing new fees to be effective
1-1-81 for the parking meter zone.

The parking meter zone areas covered by the terms of this permit
shall be in 'that portion, of the highway right of way between the
seaward side shoulder stripe of ..the two-way bicycle path and the
ocean.

Parking meter fees nay be adjusted, subject to restrictions in the

above -mentioned documents, to approximately cover-all Ventura County
costs of maintaining the area. Permittee shall maintain adequate
fee and maintenance records so that an audit by State forces can
be performed.

All 'Costs incurred for work within the State right of way pursuant
to this Encroachment Permit shall be borne by the Permittee, and
Permittee hereby waives all claims for indemnification or-
contribution from the State for such work.

This permit is contingent upon the Route Adoption by the California
Transportation Commission.

Permittee acknowledqes receipt of this Permitt No. 730-E-766969 and
fully understands and agrees to its terms.

12-3-80
Date Permittee,
Deputy Road Commissioner

GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. Definition. This permit is issued under Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Streets and Highways Code. The term
encroachment is used inthis permit as defined in the said Chapter 3 of said code, Except as otherwise provided for
public agencies and franchise holders, this permit is revocable on five days notice.
2. Acceptance of Provisions. It is understood and agreed by the Permittee that the doing of any work under this
permit shall constitute an acceptance of the provisions.
3. No Precedent Established. This permit is granted with the understanding that this action is not to be considered
as establishing any precedent on the question of the expediency of permitting any certain kind of encroachment to be
erected within right of way of State highways.
4. Notice Prior to Starting Work. Before starting work the Permittee shall notify the District Director of Trans-
portation or other designated employee of the district in which the work is to be done. Such notice shall be given at
least three days in advance of the date work is to begin. Unless otherwise specified, all work shall be performed on
weekday and during normal working hours of the Grantor's inspector.
5. Keep Permit on the Work. This permit shall be kept at the site of the work and must be shown to any repre-
sentative of the Grantor or any law enforcement officer on demand.
6. Permits from Other Agencies. The party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall,whenever the same is
required by law, secure the written order or consent to any work hereunder from the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California, or any other public board having jurisdiction, and this permit shall be suspended in operation unless
and until such order or consent is obtained.
7. Protection of Traffic. Adequate provision shall be made for the protection of the traveling public. Barricades shall
be placed with amber lights at night, also flagmen employed, all as may be required by tile grantor for the particular
work in progress.
8. Minimum Interference With Traffic. All work shall be planned and carried out so that there will be the least
possible inconvenience to the traveling public except for the specific work permitted.
9. Storage of Material. No material shall be stored within eight (8) feet from the edge of pavement or traveled
way or within the shoulder line where the shoulders are wider than eight feet. No supplies or equipment shall be stored
on the highway until permittee is ready to start work.
10. Clean Up Right of Way. Upon completion of the work, all brush, timber, scraps and material shall be entirely
removed and the right of way left in as presentable condition as before work started.
11. Standards of Construction. All work shall conform to recognized standards of construction.
12. Supervision of Grantor. All the work shall be done subject to the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of, tbe
Grantor.
13. Future Moving of Installation. It is understood by the Permittee that whenever construction, reconstruction or
maintenance work on the highway may require, the installation provided for herein shall, upon request of the Grantor,
be removed or revised at the sole expense of the Permittee within five days of such notice.
14. Expense of Inspection. On work which requires the presence of no employee of the Grantor as inspector, the
salary, traveling expense and other incidental expense of such inspection during the work shall be paid by the Permittee
upon presentation of a bill therefor.
15. Liability for Damages. The Permittee is responsible for all liability for personal injury or property damage
which may arise out of work herein permitted, or which may arise out of failure on the Permittee's part to perform his
obligations under the permit in respect to maintenance. In the event any claim of such liability is made against the State
of California, or any department, officer, or employee thereof, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold them and each
of them harmless from such claim. This permit shall not be effective for any purpose unless and until the above-named
Permittee files with the Grantor, a surety bond in the form and amount required by said Grantor, unless specifically
exempted on the face hereof. The requirement that a bond be filed does not apply in the event the Permittee is a
governmental board which derives its revenue by taxation.
16. Making Repairs. If the Grantor shall so elect, repairs shall be made by employees of the Grantor and the
expenses thereof shall be borne by the Permittee. All payments to laborers, inspectors, etc., employed by said Grantor
for or on account of the work herein contemplated, shall be made by said Permittee forthwith on receipt of written
orders, payrolls or vouchers approved by the Grantor. Or the Grantor may elect to require a deposit before starting repairs,
in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost thereof.
The Grantor will give reasonable notice of its election to make such repairs. If the Grantor does not so elect, the
Permittee shall make such repairs promptly. In every case the Permittee shall be responsible for restoring any portion of
the highway which has been excavated or otherwise disturbed to its former condition as nearly as may be possible except
where the Grantor elects to make repairs as above provided in this paragraph and except where provision to the contrary
is made in the typewritten portion of the permit. Existing improvements shall be protected or relocated as required by
work authorized by this permit. If existing improvements are damaged or their operation impaired by this work, they
shall be replaced or restored to the satisfaction of the Grantor.
17. Care of Drainage. If the work herein contemplated shall interfere with the established drainage, ample provision
shall be made by the Permittee to provide for it as may be directed by the Grantor.
18. Submit Location Plan. Upon completion of underground or surface work of consequence, the Permittee shall
furnish plan to the Grantor's District Office showing location and details.
19. Maintenance. The Permittee agrees by the acceptance of this permit to exercise reasonable care to maintain
properly any encroachment placed by it in the highway and to exercise reasonable care in inspecting for and immediately
repairing and making good any injury to any portion of the highway which occurs as a result of the maintenance of the
encroachment in the highway or as a result of the work done under this permit, including any and all injury to the to
highway which would not have occurred had such work not been done or such encroachment not placed therein.

PIPES, CONDUITS, GAS PUMPS, ETC.
20. Crossing Roadway. Service and other small diameter pipes shall be jacked or otherwise forced underneath
pavement without disturbing same. Pavement or roadway shall not be cut unless specifically permitted on the face
hereof. Service pipes will not be permitted inside of metal culvert pipes used as drainage structures.
21. Limit Excavation. No excavation is to be made closer than eight (8) feet fron the edge of the pavement except
as may be specified.
22. Tunneling. No tunneling will be permitted except on major work as may be specifically set forth on the face hereof.
23. Depth of Pipes. There shall be a minimum of 30 inches of cover over all pipes or conduits.
24. Backfilling. All backfilling is to be moistened as necessary and thoroughly compacted to required dry density
per cubic feet. Whenever required by the Grantor, a trench crossing the roadway shall be backfilled with gravel or
crushed rock.

25. Surfacing. After proper backfilling, base ans surfacing shall be replaced in kind, and the site restored to its
original condition, all to the satisfaction of the Grantor.
26. Maintain Surface. The Permittee shall maintain the surface over structures placed hereunder as long as necessary.
27. Pipes Along Roadway. Pipes and utilities paralleling the pavement shall be located at the distance from traveled
way and at such depth as specifically directed on the face hereof. Cutting of tree roots will not be permitted.
POLES, WIRES, CABLES AND OVERHEAD STRUCTURES
28. Location Pole Lines, etc. Pole lines shall be located one foot from the property line unless otherwise specified
on the face hereof.
29. Public Utilities Commission Orders. All clearances and type of construction shall be in accordance with the
applicable orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California.
30. Permission from Property Owners. Whenever necessary to secure permission from abutting property owners,
such authority must be secured by the Permittee prior to starting work.
31. Clearance of Trees. Poles must be of such height as to permit clearance over a tree 40 feet in height,where
quick growing trees are in place. At locations where slow growing trees are in place, normal construction standard may
be followed at the option of the pole line company, with provision to ultimately clear a 40-foot tree.
32. Guy Wires. No guy wires are to be attached to trees except on specific authority and in no event shall they be
so attached as to girdle the tree or interfere with its growth. Guy wires shall be kept at a minimum elevation of six feet
above the ground whenever so directed.
33. Clearing Around Poles. The Permittee shall remove and keep clear all vegetation from within a radius of at
least five feet of the poles.
34. Painting or Visibility Strips. All poles are to be painted for a distance of six feet above the ground using white
lead and oil or aluminuum paint or in lieu thereof, when poles have creosoted butts, wood, metal or other approved type
of visibility strips may be placed. Wood strips are to be Douglas fir 1" x 3" long placed on 6" centers about the
base of pole and painted with white lead and oil or aluminum paint. If metal strips are used such strips may be placed
either vertically or horizontally. Paint is to be renewed as often as may be required to maintain a satisfactory covering.
If not painted when installed or renewed as the Grantor may consider necessary, the right is reserved to have this
painting done and the Permittee hereby agrees to bear the cost thereof under the terms of this permit.
Poles that do not present a possible traffic hazard will be given consideration for exemption from those provisions upon
written request of Permittee accompanied hy pertinent data as to pole location, difference in elevation, etc. The Grantor's
decision will be final in this regard.
35. Remove Old Poles, Guys and Stubs. The entire length of such timbers shall be removed from the ground and
the holes backfilled and thoroughly tamped. In paved areas, temporary A.C. surfacing shall be placed until such time as
permanent repairs are made.

PLANTING TREES
36. Location and Species. The location and kind of trees to be planted shall be specified on the face of this permit.
37. PLanting and Maintenance Cost. The Permittee must bear the cost of planting the trees. The arrangement as to
maintenance of the trees shall be specifically set forth on the face of the permit. in particular cases arrangements may
be made for the Grantor to do this work upon deposit of a certain sum for each tree which is to be planted. The Grantor
reserves the right to assume the maintenance or to decline to do so as conditions justify.
38. Group Planting. The cost of group plantings and similar special work which may be agreed upon with the
Grantor shall be borne by the Permittee. Land for such plantings shall be secured in fee by the Permittee and turned
over to the State. Plantings for parking and picnic grounds will not be considered in this connection.

REMOVAL OR TRIMMING OF ROADSIDE TREES
39. Removal of Trees. When permit is granted for removal of a tree as an independent operation or as a part of
other work, the entire stump shall be taken out for a depth of at least two feet below the ground surface or pulverized
with a rotary stump grinder.
40. Clearing The Site. All timber and debris shall be removed from the right of way. The hole left by the stump
shall be backfilled and thoroughly tamped and the site left in a presentable condition.
41. Trimming of Trees. In general, only light trimming of branches two inches or less in diameter will be permitted
and only when specifically so stated on the face hereof. The shapeliness of the tree must be preserved.
42. Inspection. If the permit requires inspection by the Grantor during progress of the work the cost of inspection
shall be borne by the Permittee. No charge will be made for occasional routine inspection.
Road Approaches, Connecting Pavements and Minor Work
43. Grades and Specifications. Grades and types of construction shall be as detailed by plans or stated on the face
of this permit.
44. Borrow and Waste. Only such borrow and waste will be permitted and within the limits as set forth on the
face of this permit.
45. Minor Work. Grading down of small banks, small ditches, placing of awnings, and other similar minor work
shall be governed by the general provisions and as detailed on the face hereof.
Signs
46. Clearance of Signs. The minimum clearance from the sidewalk shall be twelve feet unless otherwise provided
was a provision of this permit.
Railroad Crossings
47. Safety and Convenience. The future safety and convenience of the traveling public shall be given every
consideration in the location and type of construction.
48. Meet Highway Grade. The grade and superelevation of the track must conform to the grade of the highway
at point of crossing.
49. Width of Pacing. The crossing shall be planked or paved as may be specified on the face of this permit for the
full roadway and shoulder width.

EXHIBIT 4A
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
UCLA

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ

THE INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
LOS ANCELES. CALIFORNIA 90024

12 September 1980

Tom Mikkelsen
State Coastal Conservancy
1212 BroadwaY Room 514
Oakland, CA 94612

RE: Coastal Accessway program:
Ventura County: Rincon Steps: File No. A-04-Ven-02-80 below
Ormond Beach Bridge and Parking: File No. A-04-Ven-01-80

Los Angeles County: Charmlee Connector Trail: File No.A-05-LA-01-80

Malibu Accessways: File No. A-05-LA-02-80
El Sol County Beach
El Pescador State Beach
La Piedra State Beach
Barsocchini Easenent
Wayne Easement
Point Fermin Park Trails: File No. A-05-LA-01-80

Orange County: Trafalgar Lane Overpass: File No. A-05-ORG-02-80

Dear Tom,

Below, I will review each project separately since each concerns a different
location and therfore, necessitates a separate assessment. As you requested, I
have checked our archaeological records and maps for any relevant information for
the above referenced projects. In general, prehistoric populations occupied the
coastal strip of California for some eight thousand years. Favorable locations
for permanent aboriginal habitations are mouths oil larga canyons as well as
temporary sites on the ridges, flats, and valleys of the mountains and along the
coast(Leonard 1973). Since all your projects are located along the coast, they
are within a known archaeologically sensitive area.

Rincon Steps: File No. A-04-Ven-02-80

No archaeological sites are recorded within the borders of either stairway area.
However, no systematic survey of the project area has been conducted, and within
a half mile radius of the northern stairway, four archaeological sites, Ven-28 Ven-29,
Ven-202 and Ven-240, are listed. Only one known archaeological site Ven-233, lies
within a half mile of the southern stairway located on the Ventura, CA 7.5 min.
U.S.G.S. topographic map.

Since the project proposal involves construction of stairways over existing rip-rap
at the Rincon Seawalls, and therefore, a modified and disturbed area, the possibility
of finding "in situ" cultural remains appears unlikely. Of concern for the County

of Ventura is any indirect impacts to the known archaeological sites in the
surrounding area or direct impacts to any cultural remains xincovered during the
construction of the stairways. We recommend to avoid indirect impacts that parking
of construction vehicles be limited to the beach side of Pacific Coast Highway and
should any cultural resources be found during construction that a qualified
archaeologist be contacted immediately to assess the sin-ificance of such a dis--
covery.

Ormond Beach Bridge and Parking: File No. A-04-Ven-01-80-
C,

No known archaeological sites are located within the borders of this project area.
Stephen Horne recently conducted an cultural resources assessment within the City
,of -Oxnard which included this project area as well (Horne 1980). The Ormond Reach.
'area, however,
does retain evidence of the historic and prehistoric peH -ods. -o
prehistoric sites, Ven-662 and Ven-663, as well as the lagoon area down from the
Hueneme wharf called shishlono by the Chumash Indians are located within one half
mile of the project a.'rea. Ven-664, an historic site,, is located across Pe*rkins
Ivenue and north of the project area.("orne 1980).

Since Stephen Horne, a qualified archaeologis@t, conducted a systematic survey.of
the 'Project area, it is not necessary to resurvey this area. Of concern for the
City of Point Hueneme or the City of Oxnard, however, would be any direct impacts
to buried cultural remains. It is difficult to predict the location of buried
cultural remains from only surface survey information in an undeveloped area.
Therefore, we recommend since the,project area is located within an archaeologically..
and historically sensitive area, t@at (1) a qualified archaeologist be hired
to monitor all subsurface activity during construction and (2) any buried site
discovered be excavated by a qualified archaeologist following standard archaeological
methods.

Charmlee Connector Trail: File No. A-05-LA-03-80@

....Three known archaeological sites are located within the project area. Sites, LAn-28,
--,,LAn-29, and LAn-384 lie within the proposed trail path or in such close proximitys
to.be considered under direct impact by the development.of the trail. On the enclosed
m a vi" I marked the locations of these three sites and to protect these resources, we
..@Yequire that the site locations remain confidential. This information is not for
public view.
In,1973., N. Nelson Leonard, III conducted a systematic survey of this project area
.(Leonard 1973). He confirmed then the existence oF LAn-29 and -noted even though the
sitemas disturbed, that cultural material existed in tact on the surface. Ile also
recorded at that time a new site, LAn-718, located north outside the proposed project's
Maybew recorded LAn-384 in 1969 and suggested the site was a late-@humash
limits. S.
village. Recently, due to an excavation project with Charnlee Park, Clay Singer, a
qualified archaeologist, relocated these three sites during an informal survey. Ile
reported that LAn-29 currently is buried unaer existina residences, U-n-28, somewhat
reduced in size, still, exists above the Pacific Coast Hiahway and LAn-384 remains
nearly intact except for a section partially buried byroad construction'(Sinner 1980).
At least two intact archaeological sites, L.An-28 and Un-384 are located within the
project area and would sustain adverseimpacts from the development. To avoid adverse
ag

.impacts to these cultural resources, we recommend that the connector trail be relocated.

If the proposed trail cannot be changed, then we reco,,Trnend that a qualified arch-
aeologist be hired to conduct a program of mitigative excavations, fol lowing an
archaeological -reconnaissance of the project area. Even though. LAn-29 has been
disturbed by the past housing constructions, we would recommend that this section
of the project also be included in an archaeoloaical reconnaissance to ascertain
,if any cultural remahents of this site exist.

Ma 1 ibu Accessways: File No. A-05-LA-02-80

El Sol County Beach
No known archaeological sites are locaied within the boundaries of this project.
Several archaeological sites exist, however within close proximity of the project.
Archaeological sites, Uh-180, LAn-269, Un-352, Un-455, LAn-456, L.An-457, and TAn-641
are,all located within one hAlf mile of the project area.. . Due to the project's loca-
tion within such close proximity to known archaeological sites, and since the topo-
graphy of the project location is. favorable for prehistoric habitation, we recommend
..that a qualified archaeolo-ist be hired to conduct an archaeological reconnaissance
C>
o f the project area, prior to the construction.

Pescador State Beach-
is located within the.project area.
known archaeological site, LAn 29,
Clay Singer recently related that this site is buried under existing
HoweverS C.
@residences (Singer 1980). As stated above under the Charmlee Connector Trail
C,
assessment, we would recommend that qualified archaeologist be hired to conduct a
a
@survey of the project area since cultural material may still remain within the
public section of the project.

La Piedra State Beach 7'
No known archaeolocrical sites are located within this project's borders
C,
a
cording to our records, Again, this project is located within an archaeologically
c
Sensitive area due to several known sites, LAn-384, LAn-217, and Un-480, within
roject and its favorable topography for a Prehistoric
close proximity of the p
habitation. Since no systematic survey has been conducted for this area, we
recommend that a qualified archaeologist be hired to conduct an archaeological
ce of this.project area.
reconnaissan

Barsocchini Easement
No archaeological sites are located within this project's borders. Powever,
a known archaeological site I.An-210" is located across the Pacific Coast Highway
this project. It is possible that the past road construction destroyed siteb
LAn-210, and therefore, the proposed construction of a concrete walk to the beach
will not irmact anv cultural resources. In 1953, Pal rAber.1-iart 'reported that the
site had been mostly destroyed. "Some midden.remains between the highway and the
beach but it has been badly disturbed by -road building operations and most of it
is under overburden up to 10 feet (I-Eberhart 1953). In 1973, another uodate on this
s1te was supplied and at that time, the site uras described as mostly gone.

Even though, the site has been disturbed, the possibility of finding buried cultural
remains still exists. Due to the high sensitivity of this location, we recon-mend
that a qualified archaeologist be hired to nonitor the construction phase for this
project.

llayne Easement
No' known archaeolouical sites are located within this projecti
s borders or
within a two mile radius o-1-7the project area. From the map supplied by the Coastal
Conservancy of this project, development already exists on either side of this
proposed easement. If cultural material existed at this location, then most likely
the present development has either destroyed or buried these remains. Of concern for
the County of Los Angeles would be any direct impacts to buried cultural remains If
cultural remains are encountered.during the construction, we recommend that a qualified
archaeologist be contacted to assess the significance of such a discovery. With this
qualifier, the develo ment should be permitted to proceed.
_p

Point Fermin Park Trails: File No'. A-05-1,A-01-80

'No archaeolouical sites are located within the project's borders, according to our
7:'
records. Archaeoloaical sites are recorded within a one half mile radius of the
pr
oject. Since the project plans involve improvina already existing foot paths that
are located on the face of the'.0cean's bluffs, past construction and the steen
topo 0.
graphy would eliminate finding cultural material "in situ" at this location.
if, however, buried cultural remains are encountered,during the construction, we.
recommend that a qualified archaeologist. be contacted. With this qualifier, we
recommend thatthis project be permitted to proceed.

Trafalgar Lane Overpass: File No. A-05-ORG-02-80

No known archaeological sites are located within the -proj ects boundaries or within
close proximity to the project. Since this project is a replacement of an existing
I C.
overpass, built in 1951, the-only concern for the City of San Cleme 'nte is the discovery
of buried cultural remains during the construction of the new overpass. We would
recommend that., if"cultural remains are uncovered that a qualified archaeologist
be contacted to ascertain their significance and conduct a systematic excavation if
necessary. With this qualifier, we recommend that this project, Trafalgar Lane
Overpass, be permitted to proceed.

To assess the historical development of the area and therefore, spot potential
historical structures for theareas, I checked old editions of the U.S.G.S. topographic
---maps.I consulted the following maps: Camulos, CA. 30 min. (1903), Calabasas, CA.
IS min. (1903),. Hueneme, CA. IS min. (1904), San Fedro,CA..15 min. (1896), TFlunfo
-15 min. (1904).
Pass 15 min. (1971 nd Ventura, CA. search yielded n7,cgative
Fesults; no potentially bl-storical structures were located on these old maps within
-the boundaries of the above aeferenced projects.

Our records investigation also included a review of the federal, state, and local
C,
inventories of historical monuments. The closest historical land marks to any of
the referenced projects are the following:
in the National.Register of Historic Places: Battery Osgood-Parley, Fort
MadArthur Upper Reservation
Point Fermin Lizhthouse
Berylwood, Port Hueneme
in the Ventura County Landmark listina: Hueneme Slough Site, Landmark No. 37

Powever these historical monuments are locate d outside the boundaries of the projects
planned for the Point Fermin Park and for the Port Hueneme area and will not encounter
any direct or indirect impacts from the deve@oDments as Dlanned:

In summary, we emphasize that this record search serves as the initial step in
the assessment process for most of the above referenced projects. If cultural
material is located within project boundaries, then furthur mitigative steps
will need to be planned and executed, providing that project locations cannot
be altered. The U.C.L.A. Archaeological Survey offers its professional cooperation
as further work is required on these projects.

Should you have any questions about this records search, please don't hesitate to
contact me at the Survey (213)825-7411.

Sincerely,

Beth Padon

References cited:

Eberhart, Hal
1953 Archaeological site record form for LAn-210, on file at the U.C.L.A.
Archaeological Survey.

Horne, Stephen
1980 Final Report: Onshore Cultural Resources Assessment, Union Oil
Company Platform Gina and Platform Gilda Project: Federal Leases
OCS P-0202 and P-0216, Offshore Southern California. Report to

Dames and Moore, Santa Barbara, CA. on file at the U.C.L.A. Arch
aeological Survey, E.I.R. #Ven-236.

Leonard, N. Nelson, III
1973 Archaeological Reconnaissance of Tract No. 29348, Malibu, California.

on file at the U.C.L.A. Archaeological Survey, E.I.R. #LAn-11.

Singer, Clay A.
1980 Personal communication on September 4, 1930

i EXHIBIT 48
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGE14CY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESEkVATI'ON
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
POST OFFICE BOX 2390
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811

.23 December, 1980
CEIVED
Dorothy V. Walker, Project Analyst RE";
State Coastal Conservancy DEC 2di- 1980
1212 Broadway, Room 514
Oakland, CA 94612
STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY'
Dear Ms. Walker: OAKLAND, CALI,
OCZMA)OC -'Coastal Energ3@ Imoact Program Grants Var-1-ous Loc:Ztions
I have received your letter of December'9,,1980- and attachments. Thank you for
u FR 8oo.
iniUating consultation on behalf of OCZM purs ant to 36 c
..A. Mesa Lane Beach Accessway, Santa Baibara.County - This 'proposal will not affect
any National.Register or eligible properties.

B. Pasadena Drive Easement, San Luis Obispo County - This proposal will not affect
any National Register or eligible properties.

C. Third Street Access, Cayucos, San Luis Obispo County' This proposal will not'
affect any National Register or eligible properties.

D. Rincon Steps, Ventura County - This p_roRosal will not affgct eny Nat@onal--@-
Register or eligible Properties.

E. Ormond Beach Bridge and Parking,. Ventura County - The questionof buried
a-rcheological sites is raised..,in the UCLA. report and ground disturbance monitoring
1S recommended. Why was the issue of buried sites raised? We cannot take a position
on the recommended monitoring of ground disturbance until sound archeological
reasons, for anticipating buried sites are presented.

F. Charmlee Connector Trail, Los Angeles County - It appears that archeological
sites 28 and 384 lie within the project's area of potential environmental impact.
Consequently, it becomes OCZM's responsibility to see that these sites are
evaluated in terms of the National Register Criteria; that a determination of effect
is reached in consultation with this office; that project alternatives to*avoid
adverse impact be explored; or that suitable mitigation measures be developed if
avoidance is infeasible. OCZM should arrange to have these sites accurately
defined (as necessary) in terms of areal extent; depth; cultural and temporal
affiliation; integrity; components; and significance. When these arrangements
have been made, the consultant's proposal for implementing the foregoing study
elements should be sqbmitted to us for revieu and comment. We emphasize that,
this should occur before any field work is undertaken. Once this phase is
complete, a National Register eligibility determination request must be prepared
in accordance with 36 CFR 1204. Simultaneously, the questions of effeety avoidance,
or mitigation can be discussed. A related issue involves Lan 29: how much of this
site lies beneath houses? This site would have to be dealt with if any significant

D.V. Walker
Page Two
23 December, 1980

portion of it lies within the project's area of potential environmental impact.
,.Therefore, an effort to determine if the site extends into the project area
seems warranted.

G. Malibu Accessways, Los Angeles County -

1. El Sol County Beach - We agree that the project's area of environmental
impact ought to be surveyed, The resulting report should besent to..us-for
review and comment.

2. El Pescador State Beach - Please refer to comment F, above.

30 La Piedra State Beach - Please refer to item I, above.

4. Barsocchini Easement - We cannot recommend monitoring in this instance. If
any .Imally or undisturbed buried sections of Lan 210 exist within the project's
area of potential environmental impact, a preconstruction testing.program designed
to.assess this possibility is preferable. Please respond to this suggestion.

5. Wayne Easement This proposal will not affect any National Register.,or.
eligible values.

6 Point Fermin Park Trails This proposal will not affect any National
i;gister or-eligible properties.

H. Trafalger Lane Overpass, Ora@ige County -This proposal will not'affect any
National Register or eligible properties..

In closing, we wish to emphasize that the coastlines'of the counties under. consideration
are amongthe most archeologically sensitive in the state. Although a number of-the
foregoing projects have been "cleared"t it is essential that the--prospect of
encountering resources during construction be kept in mind. Accordingly, a
.co=.-_=4_c,ati_ons- and action plan should be developed to deal with resources discovered
during construction. Treatment of such values should follow the prescription
detailed in 36 CFR 800.7

We look forward to working with you on these undertakings. Please call us if we
can be of any further assistance. Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Dr. Knox Mellon
State Historic Preservation Officer

EXHIBIT 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Govemor
CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS
1530 Capitol Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95814 For CCC Project No.80
HQ Use:
(916) 445-8183
Date received I A:-
PUBLIC SERVICE CONSERVATION WORK PROJECT FIELD EVALUATION AND A@
Sponsoring Agency Property Administration Agency, County of Ven tura

Address 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, CA 93003 rn
41D
QM
Sponsor's Representative Andrew Oshita, Parks Operation Supervisor (805) 65" `977
(Title) (Telephone7

Can
CCC Center :arillo Evaluator rBob Coriel@l Evaluation date 12/1/80
1. PROJEC-T DESCRh @.(Please be specific -.attach supplementary sheet if necessary):
'The project consists of the construction of two concrete stairways on the northern
most section of two seawalls located in Rincon Parkway, old Paciafic
Highway #1, 7 miles@north of Ventura, California

Project Crew Travel Starting/ March, 1981
Duration (days) 5 worki g Size 10 Time 45 min. Completion Date
2. PROJECT LOCATION (Indicate legal owner of property):
See above, legal owner isVentura County
Assembly District-36 Senate District 18 Congressional District 19

3- TOOLS, MATERIALS, SUPERVISION NEEDED (To be supplied by the sponsor):
Description and number
A. Tools'and
materials: Shovels supplied by CCC all other tools and materials supplied
by sponsor.

B. Technical Marvin Arnette @05 654-3977 daily* as needed
..Supervisor.
(Name) (Telephone) (Availability-
hours daily)

4. SPIKE: Yes No
'A. Location of housing:

B. Description of housing:

C. Special items needed by crew on spike:

(CCC 58 rev. 8/29/79)

APPRAISED VALUE OF WORK DONE BY CCC (i.e., cost if done by means normally used,
including labor, materials, overhead): $4,800 (@ $12 pr. hr.)

REIMBURSEMENT FOR CCC/OTHER LABOR: Available Not Available XXX

PERMITS - HAVE ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL PERMITS FOR THE PROJECT BEEN
OBTAINED (e.g., easements, permits for streambed alteration, burning etc., Coastal
Zone permits, CEQA clearance)? Yes XXX No

SUBJECT OF EVENING EDUCATIONAL PRESENTATION, OR OTHER CONTRIBUTION TO THE PROGRAM
BY THE SPONSOR:

Representative of sponosring agency will present an instructional talk
on the subject of the project.

BRIEFLY EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT MEETS THE QBJECTIVES OF:

A. Conserving, improving, developing natural resources, maintaining environmentally,
important lands or waters.
N/A

B. Providing public benefit or access. (Estimated visitor use, safety, reduced
maintenance costs, etc.).
The estimated use of the beach is 50,000 persons per season. The project provides
a safe and easy access from the parking area down to the beach.

C. Providing corpsmembers with opportunities for training in employable skills
(i.e., specific tools and use, fire control, resource management, carpentry, etc.).

This will be an excellent opportunity for corpsmembers to learn the technique of
building forms for concrete and pouring and finishing concrete.

D. Increasing the awareness and understanding of corpsmembers of the natural
environment.

N.A.

Center PSCW Coordinator/Ranger Center Director Date

Sponsor's Representative Title Date

J.E. Dugan, Chief Deputy Director, CCC Date

Signatures indicate that both agencies have approved this project for implementation as
stated in this evaluation.

TRANSPORTATION C0MMISSION
EXHIBIT 6
RESOLUTI0N NO.
R 2 4 9 3
Passed By CTC
JAN 26 1979
Recorded 2/1/79
CO OF VENTURA
BOOK 5317
PAGE 735
DOC # 11537

RELINQUISHMENT OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY IN THE
COUNTY OF VENTURA, ROAD 07-VEN-101-32.7/39.7
REQUEST NO. 866

WHEREAS, highway right of way within the County of

Ventura, between 1.3 miles north of Route 33 and 2. 8 miles south

of Santa Barbara County Line, road 07-Ven-101, hereinafter

particularly described, has been superseded by a change in the

location of said highway; and
WHEREAS, by freeway agreement dated March 25, 1969,

between the County of Ventura and the State of California, the

County agreed to accept title to frontage roads and reconstructed

county roads, upon relinquishment thereof to said County by the

State of California; and

WHEREAS, the State of California has acquired right of

way for and has constructed the above-mentioned collateral
facilities in the County of Ventura, between 1.3 miles north of

Route 33 and 2.8 miles south of Santa Barbara County Line, road

07-Ven-101, in accordance with said agreement; and

WHEREAS, this Commission has found and determined, and

does hereby find and determine, that it is desirable and in the

public interest that said highway right of way so superseded and

said collateral facilities be relinquished to the County of

Ventura for use as county highways;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS VOTED by the California Transpor-

tation Commission that it relinquish, and it does hereby relinquish,
to the County of Ventura, effective upon the recordation of a

certified copy hereof with the Recorder of Ventura County, all

of the State of California's right, title and interest in and to

said superseded highway right of way, and said collateral facilities

in said Counnty, together with the right of way and appurtenances

thereof, described as follows:

All those portions of superseded State highway right of
way, frontage roads and reconstrutted county roads shown as
Parcels 1 to 3 inclusive, as delineated and shaded on raps recorded
on August 18, 1978 in State Highway Map Book No. 4 Pages 40
through 47 inclusive, records of Ventura County.
EXCEPTING AND RESERVING to the State of California any
and all rights of ingress to and egress from the highway hereby

relinquished in and to the adjoining freeway, except at such

points as now are or may be established by resolution of this

Commission.

v c

Ln
t, A

LLJ
is

Li ci 2 J @,i

LLJ

A, vw

c (D
C',

VIE C

Cc
de

LJ
o 2

'I d6

14L

fie

.44

lot

'Ar,

ilk

CD
co C@
P, to
@c co
:5 2 0

ci
am

4z%

MA.

Rod.

at
41
cr.

1-4
CI)

let,

c (D
Or-
to( CO
VIC
120
z< ui

t; 01
W ga

cr.

vi oil

VIb

Or-

LQ
Pq

Ell

CL:

pod-

js
Z4

'177 'o
co P- (D

rk 0
Zc
FVJ ;at

ci :i j 'i
ci
>1 40 ta
U)

IL
A

6`4

ozi

4 Rod

ILD

-40

4-4
Ld lui

CL
evil

z
2 Lu
Iz
ol
40

-79- z C:3 LQ
cc
4 e
cr-
a LU S*

C3
cz
-Ai

g3,-
CDP

O.."b
Vm" . Sam=

4--4 &OWN

F-4

00
1<04
zco >4
040
co
E-4 fn
a4
0 E-4 ut
lr,,.
Z-4
.440
04
4-1
z Ji:
cc rT a
40
14 0 0 co
-f-4
z
CCX
E-4 f-4 Ld
CV821 Ld
wz

CZ
&owe

gem-&

IL
co
in
AN

cc
E-4

Iko.

7
V
CAA
qr .300
4J
OF.
0 cr

Lj jC;
>
in
Uj

Co
Of
C)
Cobc
IIP

CIO

E-4
t4

-Lame
k5o
Z CO
0 o
Z.P
En
P4
1-4 14
T-4.
ix
o P@q
>1
fill
z
94
0
Fa 0 0
E-4 E-4 E--4 cc
Ac _= _@
.E_4 ( -- _0 =
C= CV03 C%j
U)
fn z
.94 @ I..
-z W _.
SOON"
ipa

nk .

Joe

(916)445-2756

January 30, 1979 R/W ENGINEERING
07-Ven-101-32.7/39.7
Rel. Req. No. 966
OCT 29 1980 Supersoded State Highway
PROPERTY and Collateral facilities
ADMINISTRATION R-007-2 (8)
AGENCY CTC Res: R-2493
Board of Supervisors CTC Date: 1/26/79
County of Ventura

Ventura, CA 93002

RELINQUISHMENT OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY

Gentlemen:

Attached for your information is a certified copy of the above-
reforenced California Transportation Commission Resolution of

relinquishment. This action was taken in accordance with Section 73
of the Streets and Highways Code.

Your attention is directed to Section 100.9 of the Streets and
Highways Code regarding relocated State highways which bypass
cities or business districts. The directional signs orected by
the State on such highways shall be left in place and maintained
by the local agency.

The relinquishment will become effective upon recordation and

your office will be notified immediately thereafter.

Sincerely,
Original signed by
E.L. Ide
E.L. Ide, Chief
Right of Way Engineering Branch
Division of Right of Way

Attachment
RLE: to
bcc: District 07
Map Filo
Co. Rd. Comm.

11110111111111
3 6668,14108 8338