[House Report 119-656]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


119th Congress }                                              { Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
  2d Session   }                                              { 119-656

=======================================================================



 
      STREAMLINING THERMAL ENERGY THROUGH ADVANCED MECHANISMS ACT

                           ----------------
                                
  May 20, 2026.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                           ----------------
                                
         Mr. Westerman, from the Committee on Natural Resources, 
                        submitted the following


                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 1077]

    The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred 
the bill (H.R. 1077) to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to 
expedite geothermal exploration and development in previously 
studied or developed areas, having considered the same, reports 
favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the 
bill do pass.

                       Purpose of the Legislation

    The purpose of H.R. 1077 is to amend the Energy Policy Act 
of 2005 to expedite geothermal exploration and development in 
previously studied or developed areas.

                  Background and Need for Legislation

    Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) are man-made reservoirs 
in which fluid is injected into areas of the subsurface 
containing hot rock to reopen pre-existing fractures and create 
permeability.\1\ Increased permeability allows fluid to 
circulate through the re-fractured rock, transporting heat to 
the surface for electricity generation.\2\ The U.S. Department 
of Energy projects that EGS could provide 60 gigawatts of 
electricity by 2050 (8.5 percent of U.S. generation 
capacity).\3\ However, the duplicative leasing and permitting 
process for geothermal development result in timelines longer 
than those of many other energy projects.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\``What is an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS)?'', U.S. 
Department of Energy, Geothermal Technologies Office, https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/egs_basics.pdf.
    \2\Id.
    \3\``GeoVision: Harnessing the Heat Beneath Our Feet'', U.S. 
Department of Energy, Geothermal Technologies Office, May 2019, https:/
/www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2019/06/f63/GeoVision-full-report-
opt.pdf.
    \4\Morgan Smith, ``Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Introduction and 
Issues for Congress'', Congressional Research Service, September 29, 
2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47256.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    H.R. 1077 amends Section 390 of the Energy Policy Act of 
2005 (EPAct05) to expedite geothermal development. The 
legislation gives the Bureau of Land Management the authority 
to grant categorical exclusions (CEs) for geothermal drilling 
in instances where (1) drilling has occurred within the last 
five years or (2) drilling will occur within an area for which 
an approved environmental document that considered drilling was 
completed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act 
within the last five years. By adding geothermal energy 
development to Section 390 of the EPAct05, this bill would 
expedite the approval process for needed geothermal projects.

                            Committee Action

    H.R. 1077 was introduced on February 6, 2025, by 
Representative Susie Lee (D-NV). The bill was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources, and within the Committee to the 
Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources. On December 16, 
2025, the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held a 
hearing on the bill. On March 5, 2026, the Committee on Natural 
Resources met to consider the bill. The Subcommittee on Energy 
and Mineral Resources was discharged from further consideration 
of H.R. 1077 by unanimous consent. The bill was ordered 
favorably reported to the House of Representatives by unanimous 
consent.

                                Hearings

    For the purposes of clause 3(c)(6) of House rule XIII, the 
following hearing was used to develop or consider this measure: 
hearing by the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources 
held on December 16, 2025.

                      Section-by-Section Analysis

Section 1. Short title

    Section 1 names the bill the ``Streamlining Thermal Energy 
through Advanced Mechanisms Act'' or the ``STEAM Act.''

Section 2. NEPA review

    Section 2 amends Section 390 of the EPAct05 by adding 
geothermal exploration and development to the CEs authorized by 
that section.

            Committee Oversight Findings and Recommendations

    Regarding clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of 
rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee on Natural Resources' oversight findings and 
recommendations are reflected in the body of this report.

           Compliance With House Rule XIII and Congressional 
                               Budget Act

    1. Cost of Legislation and the Congressional Budget Act. 
Pursuant to clause 3(c)(2) of House rule XIII and section 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, and pursuant to 
clause 3(c)(3) of House rule XIII and section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has requested 
but not received from the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office a budgetary analysis and a cost estimate of this bill.
    2. General Performance Goals and Objectives. As required by 
clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII, the general performance goal or 
objective of this bill is to amend the Energy Policy Act of 
2005 to expedite geothermal exploration and development in 
previously studied or developed areas.

                           Earmark Statement

    This bill does not contain any Congressional earmarks, 
limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined 
under clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives.

                 Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Statement

    An estimate of federal mandates prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act was not made available to the 
Committee in time for the filing of this report. The Chair of 
the Committee shall cause such estimate to be printed in the 
Congressional Record upon its receipt by the Committee, if such 
estimate is not publicly available on the Congressional Budget 
Office website.

                           Existing Programs

    Directed Rule Making. This bill does not contain any 
directed rule makings.
    Duplication of Existing Programs. This bill does not 
establish or reauthorize a program of the federal government 
known to be duplicative of another program. Such program was 
not included in any report from the Government Accountability 
Office to Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111-139 
or identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance published pursuant to the Federal Program 
Information Act (Public Law 95-220, as amended by Public Law 
98-169) as relating to other programs.

                  Applicability to Legislative Branch

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

                Preemption of State, Local or Tribal Law

    Any preemptive effect of this bill over state, local, or 
tribal law is intended to be consistent with the bill's 
purposes and text and the Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the 
U.S. Constitution.

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

  In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no 
change is proposed is shown in roman):

                       ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005

           *       *       *       *       *       *       * 
           
                        TITLE III--OIL AND GAS

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                       Subtitle G--Miscellaneous

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 390. NEPA REVIEW.

  (a) NEPA Review.--Action by the Secretary of the Interior in 
managing the public lands, or the Secretary of Agriculture in 
managing National Forest System Lands, with respect to any of 
the activities described in subsection (b) shall be subject to 
a rebuttable presumption that the use of a categorical 
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(NEPA) would apply if the activity is conducted pursuant to the 
Mineral Leasing Act for the purpose of exploration or 
development of oil or gas, or the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 
(30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) for the purpose of exploration or 
development of geothermal resources.
  (b) Activities Described.--The activities referred to in 
subsection (a) are the following:
          (1) Individual surface disturbances of less than 5 
        acres so long as the total surface disturbance on the 
        lease is not greater than 150 acres and site-specific 
        analysis in a document prepared pursuant to NEPA has 
        been previously completed.
          (2) Drilling an oil [or gas], gas, or geothermal well 
        at a location or well pad site at which drilling has 
        occurred previously within 5 years prior to the date of 
        spudding the well.
          (3) Drilling an oil [or gas], gas, or geothermal well 
        within a developed field for which an approved land use 
        plan or any environmental document prepared pursuant to 
        NEPA analyzed such drilling as a reasonably foreseeable 
        activity, so long as such plan or document was approved 
        within 5 years prior to the date of spudding the well.
          (4) Placement of a pipeline in an approved right-of-
        way corridor, so long as the corridor was approved 
        within 5 years prior to the date of placement of the 
        pipeline.
          (5) Maintenance of a minor activity, other than any 
        construction or major renovation or a building or 
        facility.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *


                                  [all]