[House Report 119-487]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


119th Congress   }                                    {  Rept. 119-487
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session      }                                    {         Part 1

======================================================================



 
DEPLOYING INFRASTRUCTURE WITH GREATER INTERNET TRANSACTIONS AND LEGACY 
                            APPLICATIONS ACT

                                _______
                                

                February 4, 2026.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Guthrie, from the Committee on Energy and Commerce, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 1665]

    The Committee on Energy and Commerce, to whom was referred 
the bill (H.R. 1665) to require the Department of the Interior 
and the Department of Agriculture to establish online portals 
to accept, process, and dispose of certain Form 299s, and for 
other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably 
thereon without amendment and recommends that the bill do pass.

                                CONTENTS


                                                                        Page


Purpose and Summary ................................................       1
Background and Need for Legislation ................................       2
Committee Action ...................................................       3
Committee Votes ....................................................       3
Oversight Findings and Recommendations .............................       5
New Budget Authority, Entitlement Authority, and Tax Expenditures ..       5
Congressional Budget Office Estimate ...............................       5
Federal Mandates Statement .........................................       5
Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives ..............       5
Duplication of Federal Programs ....................................       5
Related Committee and Subcommittee Hearings ........................       5
Committee Cost Estimate ............................................       6
Earmark, Limited Tax Benefits, and Limited Tariff Benefits .........       6
Advisory Committee Statement .......................................       6
Applicability to Legislative Branch ................................       6
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation .....................       6
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported ..............       7











                          PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

    H.R. 1665, the ``Deploying Infrastructure with Greater 
Internet Transactions And Legacy (DIGITAL) Applications Act,'' 
was introduced on February 27, 2025, by Representatives Kat 
Cammack (R-FL) and Doris Matsui (D-CA). It would direct the 
Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, 
acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, to establish an 
online portal for the acceptance, processing, and disposal of 
applications to deploy broadband on federal lands.

                  BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

    The United States faces a persistent digital divide. 
According to the Federal Communications Commission, 
approximately 5.8 million homes and businesses lack access to 
fixed broadband at 25 Mbps download/3 Mbps upload, while 31 
percent of the geographic area of the United States lacks 4G 
LTE mobile broadband coverage at speeds of 5 Mbps/1 Mbps.\1\ 
Many of these unserved locations are near property owned by the 
federal government. This federal property is managed by 
agencies such as the Department of Interior and Department of 
Agriculture, and their subagencies. Thus, these agencies are 
responsible for reviewing applications for broadband deployment 
on this property.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\Fed. Commc'n. Comm'n., FCC National Broadband Map, https://
broadbandmap.fcc.gov/home (last updated Sept. 3, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Unfortunately, federal agencies have historically taken a 
significant amount of time to review applications to deploy 
broadband on federal property, and the process is often opaque 
to the parties involved.\2\ As one stakeholder stated, ``[t]he 
existing federal permitting process takes too long . . . and is 
an impediment to the ability of broadband providers to meet the 
needs of their consumers and communities.''\3\ Today, ``there 
is no transparency'' where applications are in the review 
process.\4\ Agencies ``just move real slow''\5\ and can go 
silent ``for long stretches of time regarding the status of 
applications or what else might be needed to deem an 
application `complete,''' followed by ``serial requests for 
additional information that could have been caught earlier or 
avoided altogether with better guidance and communication 
upfront.''\6\ The uncertainty surrounding permit reviews makes 
it difficult to plan builds, ultimately delaying deployment.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \2\Breaking Barriers: Streamlining Permitting to Expedite Broadband 
Deployment, Hearing before the Sub. on Commc'n. and Tech., H. Comm. on 
Energy and Commerce, 118th Cong. (2023) (``Permitting Hearing'') 
(Testimony of Michael Saperstein).
    \3\Id. (Written Testimony of Louis Finkel at 1).
    \4\Id. (Testimony of Michael Saperstein).
    \5\Id. (Testimony of Louis Finkel).
    \6\Id. (Written Testimony of Michael Romano at 7).
    \7\Id. (Testimony of Michael Romano).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Online portals would help providers by offering 
transparency into the federal permitting process. Portals would 
allow applicants to track their applications through the review 
process so they know where the application is in the process, 
whether more information is needed, and how close the agency is 
to making a final decision. Stakeholders testified that portals 
would provide ``clarity, accountability, and transparency with 
respect to permitting on federal lands.''\8\ They would ``allow 
applicants to know where they are in the process.''\9\ They 
would be a ``simple fix'' that would ``allow more 
predictability in the overall build cycle.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \8\Id. (Testimony of Michael Saperstein).
    \9\Id.; see also Id. (Testimony of Louis Finkel).
    \10\Id. (Testimony of Michael Saperstein).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            COMMITTEE ACTION

    On March 5, 2025, the Subcommittee on Communications and 
Technology held a hearing entitled, ``Fixing Biden's Broadband 
Blunder.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from:
           Grant Spellmeyer, President and CEO, ACA 
        Connects
           Tim Donovan, President and CEO, Competitive 
        Carriers Association
           Greg Hale, CEO, LTC Connect
           Sarah Morris, Former Acting Deputy 
        Administrator, National Telecommunications and 
        Information Administration
    On September 18, 2025, the Subcommittee on Communications 
and Technology held a legislative hearing entitled, ``Examining 
Solutions to Expedite Broadband Permitting.'' The Subcommittee 
received testimony from:
           Jonathan Spalter, President and CEO, 
        USTelecom--The Broadband Association
           Patrick Halley, President and CEO, Wireless 
        Infrastructure Association
           Staci Pies, Senior Vice President of 
        Government Affairs and Policy, INCOMPAS
           Drew Garner, Director of Policy Engagement, 
        Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
    On November 18, 2025, the Subcommittee on Communications 
and Technology met in open markup session and forwarded H.R. 
1665, without amendment, to the full Committee by a voice vote. 
On December 3, 2025, the full Committee on Energy and Commerce 
met in open markup session and ordered H.R. 1665, without 
amendment, favorably reported to the House by a record vote of 
51 yeas and 0 nays.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII requires the Committee to list the 
record votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments 
thereto. The following reflects the record votes taken during 
the Committee consideration:

    [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Pursuant to clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of 
rule XIII, the Committee held a hearing and made findings that 
are reflected in this report.

   NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY, ENTITLEMENT AUTHORITY, AND TAX EXPENDITURES

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII, the Committee 
finds that H.R. 1665 would result in no new or increased budget 
authority, entitlement authority, or tax expenditures or 
revenues.

                  CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATE

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII, at the time this 
report was filed, the cost estimate prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 was not available.

                       FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

    The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of Federal 
mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act.

         STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII, the general 
performance goal or objective of this legislation is to 
expedite broadband deployment by streamlining the permitting 
process at the federal, state, and local level.

                    DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(5) of rule XIII, no provision of 
H.R. 1665 is known to be duplicative of another Federal 
program, including any program that was included in a report to 
Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111-139 or the 
most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.

              RELATED COMMITTEE AND SUBCOMMITTEE HEARINGS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(6) of rule XIII, the following 
related hearing was used to develop or consider H.R. 1665:
           On March 5, 2025, the Subcommittee on 
        Communications and Technology held a hearing entitled, 
        ``Fixing Biden's Broadband Blunder.'' The Subcommittee 
        received testimony from:
                   Grant Spellmeyer, President and 
                CEO, ACA Connects
                   Tim Donovan, President and CEO, 
                Competitive Carriers Association
                   Greg Hale, CEO, LTC Connect
                   Sarah Morris, Former Acting 
                Deputy Administrator, National 
                Telecommunications and Information 
                Administration
           On September 18, 2025, the Subcommittee on 
        Communications and Technology held a hearing on H.R. 
        1665. The title of the hearing was ``Examining 
        Solutions to Expedite Broadband Permitting.'' The 
        Subcommittee received testimony from:
                   Jonathan Spalter, President and 
                CEO, USTelecom--The Broadband Association
                   Patrick Halley, President and 
                CEO, Wireless Infrastructure Association;
                   Patrick Halley, President and 
                CEO, Wireless Infrastructure Association; and,
                   Drew Garner, Director of Policy 
                Engagement, Benton Institute for Broadband & 
                Society

                        COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

    Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII, the Committee 
adopts as its own the cost estimate prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974. At the time this report was 
filed, the estimate was not available.

       EARMARK, LIMITED TAX BENEFITS, AND LIMITED TARIFF BENEFITS

    Pursuant to clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI, the 
Committee finds that H.R. 1665 contains no earmarks, limited 
tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits.

                      ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this 
legislation.

                  APPLICABILITY TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

             SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION

Section 1. Short title

    This section designates that the short title may be cited 
as the ``Deploying Infrastructure with Greater Internet 
Transactions And Legacy Applications Act'' or the ``DIGITAL 
Applications Act''.

Section 2. Establishment of online portals to accept, process, and 
        dispose of certain form 299s

    Subsection (a) would direct the Secretary of the Interior 
and the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of 
the Forest Service, to establish an online portal for each 
agency to accept, process, and dispose of Special Form 299s, 
the federal government's application form to deploy 
communications facilities on federal property. The Secretaries 
would have one year from the date of enactment to create these 
portals. They would be required to notify the Assistant 
Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information that 
they established the online portal within three days of 
establishment.
    Subsection (b) would direct the Assistant Secretary of 
Commerce for Communications and Information to publish a link 
to each online portal on the website of the National 
Telecommunications and Information Administration.
    Subsection (c) would define key terms used in H.R. 1665.

         CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

    This legislation does not amend any existing Federal 
statute.

                                  [all]