[House Report 119-367]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


119th Congress }                                                {  Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session   }                                                { 119-367

======================================================================



 
 COMMUNITY BANK LEVERAGE IMPROVEMENT AND FLEXIBILITY FOR TRANSPARENCY 
                                  ACT

                                _______
                                

November 4, 2025.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Hill of Arkansas, from the Committee on Financial Services, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                             together with

                             MINORITY VIEWS

                        [To accompany H.R. 5276]

    The Committee on Financial Services, to whom was referred 
the bill (H.R. 5276) to amend the Economic Growth, Regulatory 
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act to adjust the Community 
Bank Leverage Ratio, and for other purposes, having considered 
the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and 
recommends that the bill as amended do pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Purpose and Summary..............................................     2
Background and Need for Legislation..............................     3
Committee Consideration..........................................     3
Related Hearings.................................................     4
Committee Votes..................................................     4
Committee Oversight Findings.....................................     6
Performance Goals and Objectives.................................     6
Committee Cost Estimate..........................................     6
New Budget Authority and CBO Cost Estimate.......................     6
Unfunded Mandates Statement......................................     6
Earmark Statement................................................     6
Federal Advisory Committee Act Statement.........................     7
Applicability to the Legislative Branch..........................     7
Duplication of Federal Programs..................................     7
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation...................     7
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............     8
Minority Views...................................................    10

    The amendment is as follows:
    Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

  This Act may be cited as the ``Community Bank Leverage Improvement 
and Flexibility for Transparency Act'' or the ``Community Bank LIFT 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNITY BANK LEVERAGE RATIO.

  (a) In General.--Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory 
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5371 note) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a)(3)(A), by striking ``$10,000,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$15,000,000,000''; and
          (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``not less than 8 
        percent and not more than 10 percent'' and inserting ``not less 
        than 6 percent and not more than 8 percent''.
  (b) Rulemaking Deadline.--Not later than the end of the 180-day 
period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, and after 
reviewing the report issued pursuant to section 3(b), the Board of 
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the 
Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall propose 
and, not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
such agencies shall finalize rules to carry out the amendments made by 
subsection (a) and the recommended modifications contained in such 
report.

SEC. 3. REVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY BANK LEVERAGE RATIO.

  (a) In General.--The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation shall commence a review of the Community Bank 
Leverage Ratio (``CBLR'') developed under section 201 of the Economic 
Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5371 
note), and rules issued thereunder, which shall include a consideration 
of how to modify and calibrate the CBLR to encourage more qualifying 
community banks to opt-in to the CBLR framework, with an additional 
focus on--
          (1) those qualifying community banks with fewer assets; and
          (2) providing regulatory compliance burden relief so that the 
        CBLR is simple to apply.
  (b) Report.--Not later than the end of the 150-day period beginning 
on the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the 
Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall issue a report to the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate 
containing--
          (1) all findings and determinations made in carrying out the 
        review under subsection (a); and
          (2) specific recommendations on modifications, if any, to--
                  (A) the calculation of the numerator and denominator 
                of the CBLR;
                  (B) the treatment of specific asset classes or 
                exposures to better reflect the risk profiles of 
                community banks;
                  (C) the definition of and qualifying criteria for a 
                qualifying community bank;
                  (D) enhancements to the procedures for opting into or 
                out of the CBLR framework, including streamlined 
                reporting and transition mechanisms;
                  (E) the grace period to facilitate the transition to 
                and from a modified CBLR regime; and
                  (F) any statutory changes that may be needed to 
                address such recommendations.
  (c) Qualifying Community Bank Defined.--In this section, the term 
``qualifying community bank'' has the meaning given that term in 
section 201(a)(3)(A) of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and 
Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5371 note).

                          Purpose and Summary

    H.R. 5276, the Community Bank LIFT Act, was introduced on 
September 10, 2025, by Republican Representative Young Kim (CA-
40). This bill amends the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, 
and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155) to lower the statutory 
range for the community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) from 8-10 
percent to 6-8 percent. The Federal banking agencies would be 
required to conduct a review of the CBLR and how it can be 
modified to encourage more community banks to opt into the 
framework and submit a report to Congress that contains 
specific recommendations to do so. The agencies would also be 
required to propose a rule to implement these recommendations 
within 180 days and finalize within one year of enactment.

                  Background and Need for Legislation

    Congress, when passing S. 2155, recognized that many small 
community banks, with their generally low-risk business models, 
were overburdened by the complex and costly compliance 
frameworks necessary to comply with risk-weighted capital 
requirements. As a result, S. 2155 included the CBLR, an 
optional leverage ratio framework that eligible banks can adopt 
to simplify their capital adequacy requirements while 
maintaining their safety and soundness. The CBLR is calculated 
as the ratio between a qualifying bank's Tier One Capital 
(numerator) and its total on- and off-balance sheet assets 
(denominator).
    To qualify for the CBLR, a bank must have the following:
           Total on- and off-balance sheet assets of 
        less than $10 billion;
           Off-balance sheet assets that constitute 25 
        percent or less of its total on- and off-balance sheet 
        assets combined; and
           A CBLR of greater than 9 percent.
    S. 2155 directed the Federal banking agencies to promulgate 
regulations that established a CBLR between 8 and 10 percent. 
After this required rulemaking, the federal banking agencies 
landed on a CBLR of 9 percent, reasoning that ``a 9 percent 
calibration . . . will not result in a reduction in the 
aggregate level of regulatory capital currently held by [CBLR] 
electing [qualifying] banking organizations.'' However, the 
CBLR's complexities have caused implementation difficulties for 
community banks. Additionally, required holdings of capital 
under the CBLR can often be greater than that under more 
complicated risk-based and leveraged-based ratios. Federal 
Reserve Board Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman has 
indicated support for modifying the CBLR framework to make it 
more attractive and will encourage more banks to adopt it. This 
bill similarly directs the Federal banking agencies to consider 
modifications to the CBLR to incentivize community bank 
participation in the CBLR.

                        Committee Consideration


                             119TH CONGRESS

    On September 10, 2025, Representative Kim introduced H.R. 
5276, the Community Bank LIFT Act. The bill was referred solely 
to the Committee on Financial Services.
    The bill was attached to the September 9, 2025, hearing 
titled ``Promoting the Health of the Banking Sector: Reforming 
Resolution and Broadening Funding Access for Long-Term 
Resilience.''
    On September 16, 2025, the Committee on Financial Services 
met in open session to consider, among others, H.R. 5276. The 
Committee ordered H.R. 5276, as amended, to be favorably 
reported to the House of Representatives.

                            Related Hearings

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(6) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the following hearing was used to 
develop H.R. 5276:
    The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions held a September 
9, 2025, hearing titled ``Promoting the Health of the Banking 
Sector: Reforming Resolution and Broadening Funding Access for 
Long-Term Resilience.'' A draft version of the bill was 
attached to the hearing. The subcommittee heard testimony from 
the following witnesses: Mr. Dory Wiley, President and CEO, 
Commerce Street Holdings; Mr. James B. Barresi, Partner, Squire 
Patton Boggs; Mr. Hugh Carney, Executive Vice President of 
Financial Institution Policy and Regulatory Affairs, American 
Bankers Association; Dr. Norbert Michel, Vice President and 
Director, Cato Institute Center for Monetary and Financial 
Alternatives; and Mr. Robert James, President and CEO, Carver 
Financial Corporation, on behalf of the National Bankers 
Association.

                            Committee Votes

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives requires the Committee Report to include record 
votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments 
thereto.
    On September 16, 2025, the Committee ordered H.R. 5276, as 
amended, to be reported favorably to the House by a recorded 
vote of 33 yeas and 19 nays, a quorum being present. (Record 
Vote No. FC-202).
    Before the question to report was called, Representative 
Kim offered an amendment in the nature of a substitute, 
designated KIMCA_060, which made minor edits and technical 
changes. This amendment was adopted by a voice vote.


                      Committee Oversight Findings

    Pursuant to clause 3(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the findings and recommendations of 
the Committee, based on oversight activities under clause 
2(b)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
are incorporated in the descriptive portions of this report.

                    Performance Goals and Objectives

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the goal of H.R. 5276 is to direct 
the Federal banking agencies to consider modifications to the 
CBLR to incentivize community bank participation in the CBLR.

                        Committee Cost Estimate

    Clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison of the 
costs that would be incurred in carrying out H.R. 5276. The 
Committee has requested but not received a cost estimate from 
the Director of the Congressional Budget Office. However, 
pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee will adopt as its own 
the cost estimate by the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office once it has been prepared.

               New Budget Authority and CBO Cost Estimate

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(2) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and with respect 
to requirements of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives and section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee will adopt as 
its own the cost estimate for the bill prepared by the Director 
of the Congressional Budget Office. However, a cost estimate 
was not made available to the Committee in time for the filing 
of this report. The Chairman of the Committee shall cause such 
estimate to be printed in the Congressional Record upon its 
receipt by the Committee.

                      Unfunded Mandates Statement

    The Committee has requested but not received from the 
Director of the Congressional Budget Office an estimate of the 
Federal mandates pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act. The Chairman of the Committee shall cause 
such estimate to be printed in the Congressional Record upon 
its receipt by the Committee.

                           Earmark Statement

    In compliance with clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, this bill, as reported, contains no 
congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff 
benefits as defined in clause 9(e), 9(f), or 9(g) of rule XXI.

                Federal Advisory Committee Act Statement

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this 
legislation.

                Applicability to the Legislative Branch

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

                    Duplication of Federal Programs

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(5) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee states that no 
provision of the bill establishes or reauthorizes a program of 
the Federal Government known to be duplicative of another 
Federal program, including any program that was included in a 
report to Congress pursuant to section 21 of the Public Law 
111-139 or the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance.

             Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation


Section 1. Short title

    Section 1 provides the short title is the ``Community Bank 
Leverage Improvement and Flexibility for Transparency Act'' or 
the ``Community Bank LIFT Act''.

Section 2. Community Bank Leverage Ratio

    Section 2 amends the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, 
and Consumer Protection Act by increasing the asset threshold 
for eligible institutions from $10 billion to $15 billion. This 
section decreases the range for the CBLR from 8 to 10 percent 
to 6 to 8 percent. This section requires the FRB, FDIC, and OCC 
to propose rules to carry out amendments made under the Act 
within 180 days, and to finalize such rules within one year of 
enactment.

Section 3. Review of the Community Bank Leverage Ratio

    Section 3 directs the FRB, OCC, and FDIC to conduct a 
review of the CBLR, which includes a consideration of how to 
modify and calibrate the CBLR to encourage more qualifying 
community banks to opt-in to the CBLR framework. The review 
includes an additional focus on community banks with fewer 
assets and providing regulatory compliance burden relief to 
ease the application of the CBLR. This section requires the 
FRB, OCC, and FDIC to issue a report to the Committee on 
Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate 
containing all findings of the review conducted under the Act 
within 150 days of enactment of the Act. The report shall 
include (1) specific recommendations on modifications to the 
calculation of the numerator and denominator of the CBLR, (2) 
the treatment of specific asset classes to better reflect the 
risk profiles of community banks, (3) the definition and 
criteria for a qualifying community bank, (4) enhancements to 
the procedures for opting into or out of the CBLR, (5) the 
grace period to facilitate the transition to and from a 
modified CBLR regime, and (6) any statutory changes that may be 
needed.

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

  In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no 
change is proposed is shown in roman):

    ECONOMIC GROWTH, REGULATORY RELIEF, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT




           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
  TITLE II--REGULATORY RELIEF AND PROTECTING CONSUMER ACCESS TO CREDIT

SEC. 201. CAPITAL SIMPLIFICATION FOR QUALIFYING COMMUNITY BANKS.

  (a) Definitions.--In this section:
          (1) Community bank leverage ratio.--The term 
        ``Community Bank Leverage Ratio'' means the ratio of 
        the tangible equity capital of a qualifying community 
        bank, as reported on the qualifying community bank's 
        applicable regulatory filing with the qualifying 
        community bank's appropriate Federal banking agency, to 
        the average total consolidated assets of the qualifying 
        community bank, as reported on the qualifying community 
        bank's applicable regulatory filing with the qualifying 
        community bank's appropriate Federal banking agency.
          (2) Generally applicable leverage capital 
        requirements; generally applicable risk-based capital 
        requirements.--The terms ``generally applicable 
        leverage capital requirements'' and ``generally 
        applicable risk-based capital requirements'' have the 
        meanings given those terms in section 171(a) of the 
        Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5371(a)).
          (3) Qualifying community bank.--
                  (A) Asset threshold.--The term ``qualifying 
                community bank'' means a depository institution 
                or depository institution holding company with 
                total consolidated assets of less than 
                [$10,000,000,000] $15,000,000,000.
                  (B) Risk profile.--The appropriate Federal 
                banking agencies may determine that a 
                depository institution or depository 
                institution holding company (or a class of 
                depository institutions or depository 
                institution holding companies) described in 
                subparagraph (A) is not a qualifying community 
                bank based on the depository institution's or 
                depository institution holding company's risk 
                profile, which shall be based on consideration 
                of--
                          (i) off-balance sheet exposures;
                          (ii) trading assets and liabilities;
                          (iii) total notional derivatives 
                        exposures; and
                          (iv) such other factors as the 
                        appropriate Federal banking agencies 
                        determine appropriate.
  (b) Community Bank Leverage Ratio.--The appropriate Federal 
banking agencies shall, through notice and comment rule making 
under section 553 of title 5, United States Code--
          (1) develop a Community Bank Leverage Ratio of [not 
        less than 8 percent and not more than 10 percent] not 
        less than 6 percent and not more than 8 percent for 
        qualifying community banks; and
          (2) establish procedures for treatment of a 
        qualifying community bank that has a Community Bank 
        Leverage Ratio that falls below the percentage 
        developed under paragraph (1) after exceeding the 
        percentage developed under paragraph (1).
  (c) Capital Compliance.--
          (1) In general.--Any qualifying community bank that 
        exceeds the Community Bank Leverage Ratio developed 
        under subsection (b)(1) shall be considered to have 
        met--
                  (A) the generally applicable leverage capital 
                requirements and the generally applicable risk-
                based capital requirements;
                  (B) in the case of a qualifying community 
                bank that is a depository institution, the 
                capital ratio requirements that are required in 
                order to be considered well capitalized under 
                section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 
                (12 U.S.C. 1831o) and any regulation 
                implementing that section; and
                  (C) any other capital or leverage 
                requirements to which the qualifying community 
                bank is subject.
          (2) Existing authorities.--Nothing in paragraph (1) 
        shall limit the authority of the appropriate Federal 
        banking agencies as in effect on the date of enactment 
        of this Act.
  (d) Consultation.--The appropriate Federal banking agencies 
shall--
          (1) consult with the applicable State bank 
        supervisors in carrying out this section; and
          (2) notify the applicable State bank supervisor of 
        any qualifying community bank that it supervises that 
        exceeds, or does not exceed after previously exceeding, 
        the Community Bank Leverage ratio developed under 
        subsection (b)(1).

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *


                             MINORITY VIEWS

    H.R. 527 amends the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and 
Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (EGRRCPA) passed by Congress 
during Trump's first term to lower the statutory range for the 
community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) from 8-10% to 6-8% (note 
that a lower ratio permits higher leverage). The bill would 
also increase the asset threshold for banks eligible for the 
CBLR from a current cap of $10 billion in total assets to $15 
billion, and includes a study examining further changes to 
increase participation. Trump's regulators previously set the 
CBLR at 9%, not 8%, and the ratio could decline further if 
Trump's regulators exempt instruments like Treasury securities 
from the calculation. Most community banks (83%) have over 9% 
CBLR, but are not utilizing the CBLR framework for other 
reasons.
    In response to concerns that small banks faced unnecessary 
burdensome compliance requirements related to capital, Congress 
created the CBLR in Section 201 of the EGRRCPA.\1\ A bank with 
less than $10 billion in assets that meets certain risk-profile 
criteria has the option to meet a CBLR requirement instead of 
the existing, more complex risk-weighted capital requirements. 
Because most small banks currently hold enough capital to meet 
the CBLR option, this was thought to be a way to allow many 
small banks to simplify their capital-related requirements.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\P.L. 115-174.
    \2\CRS, Community Bank Leverage Ratio (CBLR): Background and 
Analysis of Bank Data (May 11, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In his first term, Trump's regulators set CBLR at 9% 
(Congress temporarily reduced CBLR to 8% during the pandemic 
before returning to 9%) and estimates have shown that roughly 
83% of community banks exceeded a 9% leverage ratio. In 2023, 
roughly 1,700 community banks were utilizing CBLR, though 
another 2,000 banks also exceeded a 9% leverage ratio and were 
either disqualified for other reasons (e.g. off-balance sheet 
exposures) or chose not to opt-in.\3\ The bill's study could 
help identify what, if any, barriers exist, and what 
modifications could help well-capitalized community banks take 
advantage of the CBLR framework. However, that may be an area 
more prudent to focus on, instead of also reducing the CBLR to 
a range of 6-8% given that most community banks already have 
more than 9%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \3\S&P Global, Over 1,700 banks adopt community bank leverage ratio 
reporting standard in Q3 (Nov. 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Most community banks historically have been better 
capitalized compared to their larger peers, in part because at 
a smaller size, they don't have the benefits of scale or 
business line diversification. By significantly reducing the 
CBLR without study and analysis (something stakeholders 
demanded when Biden's regulators proposed bank capital 
reforms), this change could unnecessarily undermine the safety 
and soundness of thousands of community banks.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \4\See Jeremy Kress and Matthew Turk, Too Many to Fail: Against 
Community Bank Deregulation (2020); and Testimony of Graham Steele 
before FI hearing, Regulatory Overreach: The Price Tag on American 
Prosperity (Apr. 29, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    There may be merit to increasing CBLR's asset threshold to 
a higher level to cover more banks since it has been 7 years 
since Congress first set the threshold. However, the bill 
increases the threshold from $10 billion to $15 billion, 
apparently utilizing the nominal GDP growth of roughly 48% 
between May 2018 when Congress first set the threshold and 
today. It may be more prudent to utilize inflation-adjusted 
numbers; for example, real GDP increased by roughly 17.5% over 
the same time period, implying a more modest threshold increase 
to $11.75 billion.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \5\BEA, Gross Domestic Product (accessed Sep. 14, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Advocacy groups like Americans for Financial Reform and 
Public Citizen oppose H.R. 5276.
    For these reasons, we oppose H.R. 5276.
            Sincerely,
                                   Maxine Waters,
                                           Ranking Member.
                                   Nydia M. Velazquez,
                                   Al Green,
                                   Joyce Beatty,
                                   Rashida Tlaib,
                                   Sylvia R. Garcia,
                                           Members of Congress.