[House Report 119-287]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


119th Congress }                                              { Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session   }                                              { 119-287

=======================================================================



 
                LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE PROJECT LANDS
                            RESTORATION ACT
                      
                           ----------------
                                
 September 15, 2025.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
            the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                           ----------------
                                
        Mr. Westerman, from the Committee on Natural Resources,
                        submitted the following


                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 2388]

    The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred 
the bill (H.R. 2388) to take certain Federal land in the State 
of Washington into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, and 
for other purposes, having considered the same, reports 
favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the 
bill do pass.

                       PURPOSE OF THE LEGISLATION

    The purpose of H.R. 2388 is to take certain Federal land in 
the State of Washington into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam 
Tribe, and for other purposes.

                  BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

    The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe is located within the Olympic 
Peninsula in northwest Washington and has approximately 984 
enrolled members.\1\ Today, the tribe's land encompasses around 
1,000 acres near the Elwha River.\2\ The tribe signed the 
Treaty of Point No Point in 1855, which entitled them to share 
a small reservation with their rival tribe that was not on 
their traditional lands of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and 
Discovery Bay.\3\ After signing the treaty, most tribal members 
opted not to live on their reservation, but rather by the 
rivers, shorelines, and sites of their ancestral burial 
grounds.\4\ Through the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, the 
Federal Government acquired 372 acres of land and assigned it 
to fourteen families in the tribe. In 1968, the tribe received 
federal recognition, which included the acres given to the 
families.\5\ As a result of federal recognition, the Lower 
Elwha Reservation was formally established for the tribe.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\Tiller, Veronica E. Velarde. Tiller's Guide to Indian Country: 
Economic Profiles of American Indian Reservations. 3rd ed. Pg. 744.
    \2\Elwha Klallam Tribe. The Strong People. https://www.elwha.org/.
    \3\Tiller, Veronica E. Velarde. Tiller's Guide to Indian Country: 
Economic Profiles of American Indian Reservations. 3rd ed. Pg. 744.
    \4\Id.
    \5\Id.
    \6\Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    H.R. 2388, sponsored by Rep. Emily Randall (D-WA), would 
take approximately 1,083 acres of National Park Service (NPS) 
land into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. The NPS 
acquired most of the land in the 1990s through the Elwha River 
Ecosystems and Fisheries Restoration Act (Elwha Act).\7\ Under 
the Elwha Act, the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams were to be 
removed in an effort to restore the Elwha River and the native 
Anadromous fisheries (i.e. species of salmon and trout). The 
Elwha Dam removal began in 2011 and ended in 2014. The Elwha 
Act also required the NPS to identify lands to transfer to the 
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe for housing, cultural, or economic 
development purposes and place them into trust.\8\ The 
remaining land was acquired by the Department of the Interior 
to construct a surface water pipeline for the tribe's fish 
hatchery.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \7\P.L. 102-495.
    \8\P.L. 102-495 Sec. 3(c)(3).
    \9\Senator Maria Cantwell. Cantwell, Murray, Randall Introduce 
Legislation to Place Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe and Quinault Indian 
Nation Lands into Trust. April 18, 2025. https://
www.cantwell.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cantwell-murray-randall-
introduce-legislation-to-place-lower-elwha-klallam-tribe-and-quinault-
indian-nation-lands-into-trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            COMMITTEE ACTION

    H.R. 2388 was introduced on March 26, 2025, by 
Representative Emily Randall (D-WA). The bill was referred to 
the Committee on Natural Resources, and within the Committee to 
the Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs. On May 20, 
2025, the Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs held a 
hearing on the bill. On June 25, 2025, the Committee on Natural 
Resources met to consider the bill. The Subcommittee on Indian 
and Insular Affairs was discharged from further consideration 
of H.R. 2388 by unanimous consent. The bill was ordered 
favorably reported to the House of Representatives by unanimous 
consent.

                                HEARINGS

    For the purposes of clause 3(c)(6) of House rule XIII, the 
following hearing was used to develop or consider this measure: 
hearing by the Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs held 
on May 20, 2025.

                      SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1. Short title

    Section 1 names the Act the ``Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe 
Project Lands Restoration Act''.

Section 2. Land taken into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe

    Section 2 places 1,082.63 acres of federal land into trust 
for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. Pursuant to the Indian 
Gaming Regulatory Act, this section also prohibits gaming on 
the land placed into trust.

Section. 3. No impact on treaty rights

    Section 3 stipulates that nothing in this Act will affect 
treaty rights under the Treaty between the United States of 
America and the S'Klallams Indians, concluded at Point no 
Point, Washington Territory, January 26, 1855 (12 Stat. 933) 
(commonly known as the ``Treaty of Point No Point'').

            COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    Regarding clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of 
rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee on Natural Resources' oversight findings and 
recommendations are reflected in the body of this report.

      COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XIII AND CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET
                                ACT

    1. Cost of Legislation and the Congressional Budget Act. 
Pursuant to clause 3(c)(2) of House rule XIII and section 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, and pursuant to 
clause 3(c)(3) of House rule XIII and section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has requested 
but not received from the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office a budgetary analysis and a cost estimate of this bill.
    2. General Performance Goals and Objectives. As required by 
clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII, the general performance goal or 
objective of this bill is to take certain Federal land in the 
State of Washington into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam 
Tribe, and for other purposes.

                           EARMARK STATEMENT

    This bill does not contain any Congressional earmarks, 
limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined 
under clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives.

                 UNFUNDED MANDATES REFORM ACT STATEMENT

    An estimate of federal mandates prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act was not made available to the 
Committee in time for the filing of this report. The Chair of 
the Committee shall cause such estimate to be printed in the 
Congressional Record upon its receipt by the Committee, if such 
estimate is not publicly available on the Congressional Budget 
Office website.

                           EXISTING PROGRAMS

    Directed Rule Making. This bill does not contain any 
directed rule makings.
    Duplication of Existing Programs. This bill does not 
establish or reauthorize a program of the federal government 
known to be duplicative of another program. Such program was 
not included in any report from the Government Accountability 
Office to Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111-139 
or identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance published pursuant to the Federal Program 
Information Act (Public Law 95-220, as amended by Public Law 
98-169) as relating to other programs.

                  APPLICABILITY TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

                PREEMPTION OF STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW

    Any preemptive effect of this bill over state, local, or 
tribal law is intended to be consistent with the bill's 
purposes and text and the Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the 
U.S. Constitution.

                        CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

    As ordered reported by the Committee on Natural Resources, 
H.R. 2388 would make no changes in existing law.

                                  [all]