[House Report 119-156]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


119th Congress }                                          { Report 
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
  1st Session   }                                         { 119-156

======================================================================
 
             GLOBAL INVESTMENT IN AMERICAN JOBS ACT OF 2025

                                _______
                                

 June 12, 2025.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Guthrie, from the Committee on Energy and Commerce, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 1679]

    The Committee on Energy and Commerce, to whom was referred 
the bill (H.R. 1679) to direct the Secretary of Commerce, in 
coordination with the heads of other relevant Federal 
departments and agencies, to conduct an interagency review of 
and report to Congress on ways to increase the global 
competitiveness of the United States in attracting foreign 
direct investment, having considered the same, reports 
favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the 
bill do pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Purpose and Summary..............................................     1
Background and Need for Legislation..............................     2
Committee Action.................................................     2
Committee Votes..................................................     2
Oversight Findings and Recommendations...........................     2
New Budget Authority, Entitlement Authority, and Tax Expenditures     3
Congressional Budget Office Estimate.............................     3
Federal Mandates Statement.......................................     3
Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives............     3
Duplication of Federal Programs..................................     3
Related Committee and Subcommittee Hearings......................     3
Committee Cost Estimate..........................................     4
Earmark, Limited Tax Benefits, and Limited Tariff Benefits.......     4
Advisory Committee Statement.....................................     4
Applicability to Legislative Branch..............................     4
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation...................     4
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............     5

                          PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

    H.R. 1679, the ``Global Investment in American Jobs Act of 
2025,'' was introduced by Representative Evans on February 27, 
2025, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. 
H.R. 1679 would direct the Secretary of Commerce and the 
Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an 
interagency review and report on ways to increase global 
competitiveness of the U.S. in attracting foreign direct 
investment (FDI) from responsible private-sector entities based 
in trusted countries and economies. The review conducted shall 
include but not be limited to the current economic impact of 
FDI in the United States, trends in global cross-border 
investment, Federal Government policies that are closely linked 
to the ability of the U.S. to attract and retain FDI, FDI as 
compared to domestic direct investment, barriers to the U.S. 
competitiveness to attract FDI, and ongoing U.S. efforts to 
attract FDI. The bill would also require the Secretary of 
Commerce and the Comptroller General to report to Congress with 
recommendations for increasing global competitiveness of the 
U.S. in attracting FDI.

                  BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

    FDI is a category of investments into an ownership stake of 
a company that originates from foreign sources whether they are 
made by an investor, company, or a government from another 
country. FDI has proven to be critical for a country's economy, 
including during financial hardships,\1\ and creates a pathway 
for countries to manufacture new and emerging technologies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/06/loungani.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In order for the U.S. to remain the global leader in the 
deployment of critical emerging technologies like autonomous 
vehicles, and the many other applications of artificial 
intelligence, quantum computing, blockchain and distributed 
ledger technologies, and advanced and new materials, it must 
remove unnecessary barriers prohibiting the expanse of FDI from 
trusted countries and economies. The U.S. must also promote 
policies to ensure it remains the premier global destination to 
invest, hire, innovate, provide services, and manufacture 
products, including emerging technologies.

                            COMMITTEE ACTION

    On March 4, 2025, the full Committee on Energy and Commerce 
met in open markup session and ordered H.R. 1679, without 
amendment, favorably reported to the House by a voice vote.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII requires the Committee to list the 
record votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments 
thereto. There were no record votes taken in connection with 
ordering H.R. 1679 reported.

                 OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    Pursuant to clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of 
rule XIII, the Committee has not held hearings on this 
legislation.

   NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY, ENTITLEMENT AUTHORITY, AND TAX EXPENDITURES

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII, the Committee 
finds that H.R. 1679 would result in no new or increased budget 
authority, entitlement authority, or tax expenditures or 
revenues.

                  CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATE

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII, at the time this 
report was filed, the cost estimate prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 was not available.

                       FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

    The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of Federal 
mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act.

         STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII, the general 
performance goal or objective of this legislation is to 
increase U.S. global competitiveness to attract foreign direct 
investment from trusted countries and economies.

                    DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(5) of rule XIII, no provision of 
H.R. 1679 is known to be duplicative of another Federal 
program, including any program that was included in a report to 
Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111-139 or the 
most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.

              RELATED COMMITTEE AND SUBCOMMITTEE HEARINGS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(6) of rule XIII, the following 
hearings were used to develop or consider H.R. 1679:
          (1) On October 14, 2021, the Subcommittee on Consumer 
        Protection and Commerce held a legislative hearing on 
        H.R. 2907.\2\ The hearing was entitled, ``Investing in 
        American Jobs: Legislation to Strengthen Manufacturing 
        and Competitiveness.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \2\The text of H.R. 1679 was introduced in substantially similar 
form in the 118th Congress as H.R. 2907.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (2) On February 1, 2023, the Subcommittee on 
        Innovation, Data, and Commerce held a hearing entitled 
        ``Economic Danger Zone: How America Competes to Win the 
        Future Versus China.'' The Subcommittee received 
        testimony from:
                   Brandon Pugh, Policy Director and 
                Resident Senior Fellow, R Street Institute;
                   Jeff Farrah, Executive Director, 
                Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association (AVIA);
                   Samm Sacks, Cyber Policy Fellow, 
                International Security Program, New America; 
                and
                   Marc Jarsulic, Senior Fellow and 
                Chief Economist, Center for American Progress.
          (3) On February 12, 2025, the Subcommittee on 
        Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing 
        entitled ``AI in Manufacturing: Securing American 
        Leadership in Manufacturing and the Next Generation of 
        Technologies.'' The Subcommittee received testimony 
        from:
                   Barbara Humpton, President and CEO, 
                Siemens Corporation;
                   Jason Oxman, President and CEO, 
                Information Technology Industry Council (ITI);
                   Jeff Kinder, Executive Vice 
                President, Product Development and 
                Manufacturing Solutions, Autodesk; and
                   Elisabeth B. Reynolds, Professor of 
                Practice, Massachusetts Institute of 
                Technology.

                        COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

    Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII, the Committee 
adopts as its own the cost estimate prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974. At the time this report was 
filed, the estimate was not available.

       EARMARK, LIMITED TAX BENEFITS, AND LIMITED TARIFF BENEFITS

    Pursuant to clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI, the 
Committee finds that H.R. 1679 contains no earmarks, limited 
tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits.

                      ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this 
legislation.

                  APPLICABILITY TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

             SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION

Section 1. Short title

    Section 1 designates that the short title may be cited as 
the ``Global Investment in American Jobs Act of 2025''.

Section. 2. Sense of Congress

    Section 2 provides the Sense of Congress expressing the 
importance of the ability of the U.S. to attract FDI from 
responsible private-sector entities based in trusted countries, 
the need to remove barriers prohibiting larger numbers of 
inbound FDI, the need to promote policies that encourage 
inbound FDI from responsible private-sector entities based in 
trusted countries and economies and that ensure the U.S. 
remains the global leader in developing and deploying emerging 
technologies. The sense of Congress also expresses that FDI 
should strengthen the U.S. security, improve the domestic 
standard of living and U.S. jobs, and that any FDI by companies 
or other entities owned, directed, supported, or influenced by 
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is a threat to U.S. security 
and merits an aggressive policy to protect U.S. interests, 
jobs, intellectual property, and security.

Section. 3. Foreign direct investment review

    Section 3 requires the Secretary of the Department of 
Commerce and the Comptroller General of the United States, in 
consultation with the Federal Interagency Investment Working 
Group established pursuant to Executive Order 13577, and in 
consultation with the heads of other relevant agencies, to 
conduct an interagency review of the global competitiveness of 
the U.S. in attracting FDI from responsible private-sector 
entities based in foreign countries. The section requires the 
review to include certain aspects including but not limited to, 
the economic impact of FDI in the U.S.; Federal Government 
policies that encourage the attraction and retention of FDI; 
FDI as compared to direct investment by domestic entities; FDI 
that takes the form of greenfield investments; specific 
information on the efforts and the prevalence of investments 
made with the backing of the CCP, especially investments 
related to manufacturing, services, trade (with an emphasis on 
digital trade), and jobs, and how such efforts result in the 
displacement, offshoring, or outsourcing, including the impact 
of such investments on supply chains; the adequacy of efforts 
by the Federal Government to encourage and facilitate U.S. 
inbound FDI; and other barriers to the ability of the U.S. to 
compete globally in an increasingly digital economy.
    Section 3 clarifies that the review may not address laws or 
policies relating to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the 
U.S.
    Section 3 also requires the Secretary of Commerce to 
provide an opportunity for public comment on the matters 
covered by the review and subsequently provide a report to 
Congress on the findings of the review, and provide 
recommendations for increasing the global competitiveness of 
the U.S. in attracting FDI from responsible private-sector 
entities based in trusted countries.
    Lastly, section 3 defines terms commonly used in the 
legislation.

         CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

    This legislation does not amend any existing Federal 
statute.

                                  [all]