[House Report 118-285]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


118th Congress }                                          { Report 
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session   }                                          { 118-285

======================================================================
 
                      I-27 NUMBERING ACT OF 2023

                                _______
                                

 November 29, 2023.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
            the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Graves of Missouri, from the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 3209]

    The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom 
was referred the bill (H.R. 3209) to amend the Intermodal 
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to designate the 
Texas and New Mexico portions of the future Interstate-
designated segments of the Port-to-Plains Corridor as 
Interstate Route 27, and for other purposes, having considered 
the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and 
recommends that the bill as amended do pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Purpose of Legislation...........................................     2
Background and Need for Legislation..............................     2
Hearings.........................................................     2
Legislative History and Consideration............................     2
Committee Votes..................................................     3
Committee Oversight Findings and Recommendations.................     3
New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures........................     3
Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate........................     3
Performance Goals and Objectives.................................     3
Duplication of Federal Programs..................................     4
Congressional Earmarks, Limited Tax Benefits, and Limited Tariff 
  Benefits.......................................................     4
Federal Mandates Statement.......................................     4
Preemption Clarification.........................................     4
Advisory Committee Statement.....................................     4
Applicability to Legislative Branch..............................     4
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation...................     4
    Section 1. Short Title.......................................     4
    Section 2. Numbering of Designated Future Interstate.........     5
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............     5

    The amendment is as follows:
  Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

  This Act may be cited as the ``I-27 Numbering Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. NUMBERING OF DESIGNATED FUTURE INTERSTATE.

  (a) In General.--Section 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-240) is amended 
by inserting ``The routes referred to in clause (i) (other than 
subclauses (V)(aa) and (V)(bb) and subclause (IX)(aa) of that clause) 
and clause (iv) of subsection (c)(38)(A) are designated as Interstate 
Route I-27. The route referred to in subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(aa) is 
designated as Interstate Route I-27E. The route referred to in 
subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(bb) is designated as Interstate Route I-
27W. The route referred to in subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(IX)(aa) is 
designated as Interstate Route I-127N.'' before ``The route referred to 
in subsection (c)(45)''.
  (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1105(c)(38)(A)(i) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 
102-240) is amended--
          (1) in subclause (V)--
                  (A) by striking ``Lamesa, the Corridor'' and 
                inserting the following: ``Lamesa--
                                  ``(aa) the Corridor''; and
                  (B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by striking 
                ``87 and, the Corridor'' and inserting the following: 
                ``87; and
                                  ``(bb) the Corridor''; and
          (2) in subclause (IX)--
                  (A) by striking ``(IX) United States Route 287'' and 
                inserting the following:
                          ``(IX)(aa) United States Route 287''; and
                  (B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by striking 
                ``Oklahoma, and also United States Route 87'' and 
                inserting the following: ``Oklahoma; and
                          ``(bb) United States Route 87''.

                         Purpose of Legislation

    The purpose of the H.R. 3209, as amended, is to amend the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to 
designate the Texas and New Mexico portions of the future 
Interstate-designated segments of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor 
as Interstate Route 27, and for other purposes.

                  Background and Need for Legislation

    H.R. 3209, as amended, names and numbers segments of the 
Ports-to-Plains Corridor in Texas as Interstate Route 27 (I-
27). The Ports-to-Plains Corridor travels through Texas, 
Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Colorado, ultimately connecting with 
other highways to provide a network between Mexico to Canada. 
This route plays an important role in commerce, helping 
facilitate the movement of agricultural and energy products 
from hubs to market. The segment of the Ports-to-Plains 
Corridor to be numbered as I-27 was previously designated by 
Congress as a future interstate highway as part of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103).

                                Hearings

    For the purposes of rule XIII, clause 3(c)(6)(A) of the 
118th Congress--
    No hearings were held to develop or consider H.R. 3209 in 
the 118th Congress.

                 Legislative History and Consideration

    H.R. 3209, the ``I-27 Numbering Act of 2023'', was 
introduced in the United States House of Representatives of May 
11, 2023, by Representative Arrington of Texas, and referred to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Within the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, H.R. 3209 was 
referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. The 
Subcommittee on Highways and Transit was discharged from 
further consideration of H.R. 3209 on November 15, 2023.
    The Committee considered H.R. 3209 on November 15, 2023, 
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a 
favorable recommendation, with amendment, by voice vote.
    The following amendments were offered:
          An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 
        3209, offered by Mr. Crawford of Arkansas, was AGREED 
        TO, by voice vote.

                            Committee Votes

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives requires each committee report to include the 
total number of votes cast for and against on each record vote 
on a motion to report and on any amendment offered to the 
measure or matter, and the names of those members voting for 
and against.
    No recorded votes were taken during consideration of H.R. 
3209, as amended.

            Committee Oversight Findings and Recommendations

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(1) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee's oversight findings and recommendations are 
reflected in this report.

               New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(2) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and with respect 
to requirements of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives and section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has requested 
but not received a cost estimate for this bill from the 
Director of Congressional Budget Office. The Committee has 
requested but not received from the Director of the 
Congressional Budget Office a statement as to whether this bill 
contains any new budget authority, spending authority, credit 
authority, or an increase or decrease in revenues or tax 
expenditures. The Chairman of the Committee shall cause such 
estimate and statement to be printed in the Congressional 
Record upon its receipt by the Committee.

               Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate

    Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of House rule XIII, when 
available the Committee will adopt as its own the cost estimate 
prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office 
pursuant to section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974.

                    Performance Goals and Objectives

    With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(4) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
performance goal and objective of this legislation is to 
provide naming and numbering of certain routes of the Ports-to-
Plains Corridor as Interstate Route 27.

                    Duplication of Federal Programs

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(5) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee finds that no provision 
of H.R. 3209, as amended, establishes or reauthorizes a program 
of the Federal government known to be duplicative of another 
Federal program, a program that was included in any report from 
the Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to 
section 21 of Public Law 111-139, or a program related to a 
program identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal 
Domestic Assistance.

   Congressional Earmarks, Limited Tax Benefits, and Limited Tariff 
                                Benefits

    In compliance with clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, this bill, as reported, contains no 
congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff 
benefits as defined in clause 9(e), 9(f), or 9(g) of the rule 
XXI.

                       Federal Mandates Statement

    When available the Committee will adopt as its own the 
estimate of Federal mandates prepared by the Director of the 
Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Public Law 104-4).

                        Preemption Clarification

    Section 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
requires the report of any Committee on a bill or joint 
resolution to include a statement on the extent to which the 
bill or joint resolution is intended to preempt state, local, 
or tribal law. The Committee finds that H.R. 3209, as amended, 
does not preempt any state, local, or tribal law.

                      Advisory Committee Statement

    No advisory committees within the definition of Section 
5(b) of the appendix to Title 5, United States Code, are 
created by this legislation.

                  Applicability to Legislative Branch

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act (Public Law 
104-1).

             Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation


Section 1. Short title

    This section provides that this bill may be cited as the 
``I-27 Numbering Act of 2023''.

Section 2. Numbering of designated future interstate

    This section designates segments of the Ports-to-Plains 
corridor as Interstate Route 27.

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

    In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is 
proposed is shown in roman):

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

  In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no 
change is proposed is shown in roman):

        INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991




           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
                    TITLE I--SURFACE TRANSPORTATION

Part A--Title 23 Programs

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *


SEC. 1105. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

  (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
          (1) the construction of the Interstate Highway System 
        connected the major population centers of the Nation 
        and greatly enhanced economic growth in the United 
        States;
          (2) many regions of the Nation are not now adequately 
        served by the Interstate System or comparable highways 
        and require further highway development in order to 
        serve the travel and economic development needs of the 
        region; and
          (3) the development of transportation corridors is 
        the most efficient and effective way of integrating 
        regions and improving efficiency and safety of commerce 
        and travel and further promoting economic development.
  (b) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this section to identify 
highway corridors and evacuation routes of national 
significance; to include those corridors on the National 
Highway System; to allow the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
States, to prepare long-range plans and feasibility studies for 
these corridors; to allow the States to give priority to 
funding the construction of these corridors; and to provide 
increased funding for segments of these corridors that have 
been identified for construction.
  (c) Identification of High Priority Corridors on National 
Highway System.--The following are high priority corridors on 
the National Highway System:
          (1) North-South Corridor from Kansas City, Missouri, 
        to Shreveport, Louisiana.
          (2) Avenue of the Saints Corridor from St. Louis, 
        Missouri, to St. Paul, Minnesota.
          (3) East-West Transamerica Corridor commencing on the 
        Atlantic Coast in the Hampton Roads area going westward 
        across Virginia to the vicinity of Lynchburg, Virginia, 
        continuing west to serve Roanoke and then to a West 
        Virginia corridor centered around Beckley to Welch as 
        part of the Coalfields Expressway described in section 
        1069(v), then to Williamson sharing a common corridor 
        with the I-73/74 Corridor (referred to in item 12 of 
        the table contained in subsection (f)), then to a 
        Kentucky Corridor centered on the cities of Pikeville, 
        Jenkins, Hazard, London, and Somerset; then, generally 
        following the Louie B. Nunn Parkway corridor from 
        Somerset to Columbia, to Glasgow, to I-65; then to 
        Bowling Green, Hopkinsville, Benton, and Paducah, into 
        Illinois, and into Missouri and exiting western 
        Missouri and moving westward across southern Kansas.
          (4) Hoosier Heartland Industrial Corridor from 
        Lafayette, Indiana, to Toledo, Ohio.
          (5)(A) I-73/74 North-South Corridor from Charleston, 
        South Carolina, through Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 
        to Portsmouth, Ohio, to Cincinnati, Ohio, to termini at 
        Detroit, Michigan and Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. The 
        Sault Ste. Marie terminus shall be reached via a 
        corridor connecting Adrian, Jackson, Lansing, Mount 
        Pleasant, and Grayling, Michigan.
          (B)(i) In the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Corridor 
        shall generally follow--
                  (I) United States Route 220 from the 
                Virginia-North Carolina border to I-581 south 
                of Roanoke;
                  (II) I-581 to I-81 in the vicinity of 
                Roanoke;
                  (III) I-81 to the proposed highway to 
                demonstrate intelligent transportation systems 
                authorized by item 29 of the table in section 
                1107(b) in the vicinity of Christiansburg to 
                United States Route 460 in the vicinity of 
                Blacksburg; and
                  (IV) United States Route 460 to the West 
                Virginia State line.
          (ii) In the States of West Virginia, Kentucky, and 
        Ohio, the Corridor shall generally follow--
                  (I) United States Route 460 from the West 
                Virginia State line to United States Route 52 
                at Bluefield, West Virginia; and
                  (II) United States Route 52 to United States 
                Route 23 at Portsmouth, Ohio.
          (iii) In the States of North Carolina and South 
        Carolina, the Corridor shall generally follow--
                  (I) in the case of I-73--
                          (aa) United States Route 220 from the 
                        Virginia State line to State Route 68 
                        in the vicinity of Greensboro;
                          (bb) State Route 68 to I-40;
                          (cc) I-40 to United States Route 220 
                        in Greensboro;
                          (dd) United States Route 220 to 
                        United States Route 1 near Rockingham;
                          (ee) United States Route 1 to the 
                        South Carolina State line; and
                                  (ff) South Carolina State 
                                line to the Myrtle Beach Conway 
                                region to Georgetown, South 
                                Carolina, including a 
                                connection to Andrews following 
                                the route 41 corridor and to 
                                Camden following the U.S. Route 
                                521 corridor; and
                  (II) in the case of I-74--
                          (aa) I-77 from Bluefield, West 
                        Virginia, to the junction of I-77 and 
                        the United States Route 52 connector in 
                        Surry County, North Carolina;
                          (bb) the I-77/United States Route 52 
                        connector to United States Route 52 
                        south of Mount Airy, North Carolina;
                          (cc) United States Route 52 to United 
                        States Route 311 in Winston-Salem, 
                        North Carolina;
                          (dd) United States Route 311 to 
                        United States Route 220 in the vicinity 
                        of Randleman, North Carolina;
                          (ee) United States Route 220 to 
                        United States Route 74 near Rockingham;
                          (ff) United States Route 74 to United 
                        States Route 76 near Whiteville;
                          (gg) United States Route 74/76 to the 
                        South Carolina State line in Brunswick 
                        County; and
                                  (hh) South Carolina State 
                                line to the Myrtle Beach Conway 
                                region to Georgetown, South 
                                Carolina.
          (6) United States Route 80 Corridor from Meridian, 
        Mississippi, to Savannah, Georgia.
          (7) East-West Corridor from Memphis, Tennessee, 
        through Huntsville, Alabama, to Atlanta, Georgia, and 
        Chattanooga, Tennessee.
          (8) Highway 412 East-West Corridor from Tulsa, 
        Oklahoma, through Arkansas along United States Route 
        62/63/65 to Nashville, Tennessee.
          (9) United States Route 220 and the Appalachian 
        Thruway Corridor from Business 220 in Bedford, 
        Pennsylvania, to the vicinity of Corning, New York, 
        including United States Route 322 between United States 
        Route 220 and I-80.
          (10) Appalachian Regional Corridor X.
          (11) Appalachian Regional Corridor V.
          (12) United States Route 25E Corridor from Corbin, 
        Kentucky, to Morristown, Tennessee, via Cumberland Gap, 
        to include that portion of Route 58 in Virginia which 
        lies within the Cumberland Gap Historical Park.
          (13) Raleigh-Norfolk Corridor from Raleigh, North 
        Carolina, through Rocky Mount, Williamston, and 
        Elizabeth City, North Carolina, to Norfolk, Virginia.
          (14) Heartland Expressway from Denver, Colorado, 
        through Scottsbluff, Nebraska, to Rapid City, South 
        Dakota as follows:
                  (A) In the State of Colorado, the Heartland 
                Expressway Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) Interstate 76 from Denver to 
                        Brush; and
                          (ii) Colorado Highway 71 from Limon 
                        to the border between the States of 
                        Colorado and Nebraska.
                  (B) In the State of Nebraska, the Heartland 
                Expressway Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) Nebraska Highway 71 from the 
                        border between the States of Colorado 
                        and Nebraska to Scottsbluff;
                          (ii) United States Route 26 from 
                        Scottsbluff to the intersection with 
                        State Highway L62A;
                          (iii) State Highway L62A from the 
                        intersection with United States Route 
                        26 to United States Route 385 north of 
                        Bridgeport;
                          (iv) United States Route 385 to the 
                        border between the States of Nebraska 
                        and South Dakota; and
                          (v) United States Highway 26 from 
                        Scottsbluff to the border of the States 
                        of Nebraska and Wyoming.
                  (C) In the State of Wyoming, the Heartland 
                Expressway Corridor shall generally follow 
                United States Highway 26 from the border of the 
                States of Nebraska and Wyoming to the 
                termination at Interstate 25 at Interchange 
                number 94.
                  (D) In the State of South Dakota, the 
                Heartland Expressway Corridor shall generally 
                follow--
                          (i) United States Route 385 from the 
                        border between the States of Nebraska 
                        and South Dakota to the intersection 
                        with State Highway 79; and
                          (ii) State Highway 79 from the 
                        intersection with United States Route 
                        385 to Rapid City.
          (15) Urban Highway Corridor along M-59 in Michigan.
          (16) Economic Lifeline Corridor along I-15 and I-40 
        in California, Arizona, and Nevada.
          (17) Route 29 Corridor from Greensboro, North 
        Carolina, to the District of Columbia.
          (18) Corridor from Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, through 
        Port Huron, Michigan, southwesterly along Interstate 
        Route 69 through Indianapolis, Indiana, through 
        Evansville, Indiana, Memphis, Tennessee, Mississippi, 
        Arkansas, Shreveport/Bossier, Louisiana, to Houston, 
        Texas, and to the Lower Rio Grande Valley at the border 
        between the United States and Mexico, as follows:
                  (A) In Michigan, the corridor shall be from 
                Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, southwesterly along 
                Interstate Route 94 to the Ambassador Bridge 
                interchange in Detroit, Michigan.
                  (B) In Michigan and Illinois, the corridor 
                shall be from Windsor, Ontario, Canada, through 
                Detroit, Michigan, westerly along Interstate 
                Route 94 to Chicago, Illinois.
                  (C) In Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, and 
                Louisiana, the Corridor shall--
                          (i) follow the alignment generally 
                        identified in the Corridor 18 Special 
                        Issues Study Final Report; and
                          (ii) include a connection between the 
                        Corridor east of Wilmar, Arkansas, and 
                        west of Monticello, Arkansas, to Pine 
                        Bluff, Arkansas.
                  (D) In the Lower Rio Grande Valley, the 
                Corridor shall--
                          (i) include United States Route 77 
                        from the Rio Grande River to Interstate 
                        Route 37 at Corpus Christi, Texas, and 
                        then to Victoria, Texas, via U.S. Route 
                        77;
                          (ii) include United States Route 281 
                        from the Rio Grande River to Interstate 
                        Route 37 and then to Victoria, Texas, 
                        via United States Route 59;
                          (iii) include the Corpus Christi 
                        Northside Highway and Rail Corridor 
                        from the existing intersection of 
                        United States Route 77 and Interstate 
                        Route 37 to United States Route 181, 
                        including FM511 from United States 
                        Route 77 to the Port of Brownsville; 
                        and
                          (iv) include Texas State Highway 44 
                        from United States Route 59 at Freer, 
                        Texas, to Texas State Highway 358.
                  (E) In Kentucky, the corridor shall utilize 
                the existing Purchase Parkway from the 
                Tennessee State line to Interstate 24, follow 
                Interstate Route 24 to the Wendell H. Ford 
                Western Kentucky Parkway, then utilize the 
                existing Wendell H. Ford Western Kentucky 
                Parkway and Edward T. Breathitt (Pennyrile) 
                Parkway to Henderson.
          (19) United States Route 395 Corridor from the United 
        States-Canadian border to Reno, Nevada.
          (20) United States Route 59 Corridor from Laredo, 
        Texas, through Houston, Texas, to the vicinity of 
        Texarkana, Texas.
          (21) United States Route 219 Corridor from Buffalo, 
        New York, to the intersection of Interstate Route 80.
          (22) The Alameda Transportation Corridor along 
        Alameda Street from the entrance to the ports of Los 
        Angeles and Long Beach to Interstate 10, Los Angeles, 
        California.
          (23) The Interstate Route 35 Corridor from Laredo, 
        Texas, through Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to Wichita, 
        Kansas, to Kansas City, Kansas/Missouri, to Des Moines, 
        Iowa, to Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Duluth, Minnesota, 
        including I-29 between Kansas City and the Canadian 
        border and the connection from Wichita, Kansas, to 
        Sioux City, Iowa, which includes I-135 from Wichita, 
        Kansas to Salina, Kansas, United States Route 81 from 
        Salina, Kansas, to Norfolk, Nebraska, Nebraska State 
        Route 35 from Norfolk, Nebraska, to South Sioux City, 
        Nebraska, and the connection to I-29 in Sioux City, 
        Iowa.
          (24) The Dalton Highway from Deadhorse, Alaska to 
        Fairbanks, Alaska.
          (25) State Route 168 (South Battlefield Boulevard), 
        Virginia, from the Great Bridge Bypass to the North 
        Carolina State line.
          (26) The CANAMEX Corridor from Nogales, Arizona, 
        through Las Vegas, Nevada, to Salt Lake City, Utah, to 
        Idaho Falls, Idaho, to Montana, to the Canadian Border 
        as follows:
                  (A) In the State of Arizona, the CANAMEX 
                Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) I-19 from Nogales to Tucson;
                          (ii) I-10 from Tucson to Phoenix; and
                          (iii) United States Route 93 in the 
                        vicinity of Phoenix to the Nevada 
                        Border.
                  (B) In the State of Nevada, the CANAMEX 
                Corridor shall follow--
                          (i) United States Route 93 from the 
                        Arizona Border to Las Vegas; and
                          (ii) I-15 from Las Vegas to the Utah 
                        Border.
                  (C) From the Utah Border through Montana to 
                the Canadian Border, the CANAMEX Corridor shall 
                follow I-15.
          (27) The Camino Real Corridor from El Paso, Texas, to 
        Denver, Colorado, as follows:
                  (A) In the State of Texas, the Camino Real 
                Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) arterials from the international 
                        ports of entry to I-10 in El Paso 
                        County; and
                          (ii) I-10 from El Paso County to the 
                        New Mexico border.
                  (B) In the State of New Mexico, the Camino 
                Real Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) I-10 from the Texas Border to Las 
                        Cruces; and
                          (ii) I-25 from Las Cruces to the 
                        Colorado Border.
                  (C) In the State of Colorado, the Camino Real 
                Corridor shall generally follow I-25 from the 
                New Mexico border to Denver continuing to the 
                Wyoming border.
                  (D) In the State of Wyoming, the Camino Real 
                Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) I-25 north to join with I-90 at 
                        Buffalo; and
                          (ii) I-90 to the Montana border.
                  (E) In the State of Montana, the Camino Real 
                Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (i) I-90 to Billings; and
                          (ii) Montana Route 3, United States 
                        Route 12, United States Route 191, 
                        United States Route 87, to I-15 at 
                        Great Falls; and
                          (iii) I-15 from Great Falls to the 
                        Canadian border.
          (28) The Birmingham Northern Beltline beginning at I-
        59 in the vicinity of Trussville, Alabama, and 
        traversing westwardly intersecting with United States 
        Route 75, United States Route 79, and United States 
        Route 31; continuing southwestwardly intersecting 
        United States Route 78 and terminating at I-59 with the 
        I-459 interchange.
          (29) The Coalfields Expressway beginning at Beckley, 
        West Virginia, to Pound, Virginia, generally following 
        the corridor defined as State Routes 54, 97, 10, 16, 
        and 83.
          (30) Interstate Route 5 in the States of California, 
        Oregon, and Washington, including California State 
        Route 905 between Interstate Route 5 and the Otay Mesa 
        Port of Entry.
          (31) The Mon-Fayette Expressway and Southern Beltway 
        in Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
          (32) The Wisconsin Development Corridor from the 
        Iowa, Illinois, and Wisconsin border near Dubuque, 
        Iowa, to the Upper Mississippi River Basin near Eau 
        Claire, Wisconsin, as follows:
                  (A) United States Route 151 from the Iowa 
                border to Fond du Lac via Madison, Wisconsin, 
                then United States Route 41 from Fond du Lac to 
                Marinette via Oshkosh, Appleton, and Green Bay, 
                Wisconsin.
                  (B) State Route 29 from Green Bay to I-94 via 
                Wausau, Chippewa Falls, and Eau Claire, 
                Wisconsin.
                  (C) United States Route 10 from Appleton to 
                Marshfield, Wisconsin.
          (33) The Capital Gateway Corridor following United 
        States Route 50 from the proposed intermodal 
        transportation center connected to and including the I-
        395 corridor in Washington, D.C., to the intersection 
        of United States Route 50 with Kenilworth Avenue and 
        the Baltimore-Washington Parkway in Maryland.
          (34) The Alameda Corridor-East and Southwest Passage, 
        California. The Alameda Corridor-East is generally 
        described as the corridor from East Los Angeles 
        (terminus of Alameda Corridor) through Los Angeles, 
        Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties, to 
        termini at Barstow in San Bernardino County and 
        Coachella in Riverside County. The Southwest Passage 
        shall follow I-10 from San Bernardino to the Arizona 
        State line.
          (35) Everett-Tacoma FAST Corridor.
          (36) New York and Pennsylvania State Route 17 from 
        Harriman, New York, to its intersection with I-90 in 
        Pennsylvania.
          (37) United States Route 90 from I-49 in Lafayette, 
        Louisiana, to I-10 in New Orleans.
          (38)(A) The Ports-to-Plains Corridor from Laredo, 
        Texas, via I-27 to Denver, Colorado, shall include:
                  (i) In the State of Texas the Ports-to-Plains 
                Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (I) I-35 from Laredo to United States 
                        Route 83 at Exit 18;
                          (II) United States Route 83 from Exit 
                        18 to Carrizo Springs;
                          (III) United States Route 277 from 
                        Carrizo Springs to San Angelo;
                          (IV) United States Route 87 from San 
                        Angelo to Sterling City;
                          (V) From Sterling City to [Lamesa, 
                        the Corridor] Lamesa--
                                  (aa) the Corridor  shall 
                                follow United States Route [87 
                                and, the Corridor] 87; and
                                  (bb) the Corridor  shall also 
                                follow Texas Route 158 from 
                                Sterling City to I-20, then via 
                                I-20 West to Texas Route 349 
                                and, Texas Route 349 from 
                                Midland to Lamesa;
                          (VI) United States Route 87 from 
                        Lamesa to Lubbock;
                          (VII) I-27 from Lubbock to Amarillo;
                          (VIII) United States Route 287 from 
                        Amarillo to Dumas; and
                          [(IX) United States Route 287]
                          (IX)(aa) United States Route 287  
                        from Dumas to the border between the 
                        States of Texas and [Oklahoma, and also 
                        United States Route 87] Oklahoma; and
                          (bb) United States Route 87  from 
                        Dumas to the border between the States 
                        of Texas and New Mexico.
                  (ii) In the State of Oklahoma, the Ports-to-
                Plains Corridor shall generally follow United 
                States Route 287 from the border between the 
                States of Texas and Oklahoma to the border 
                between the States of Oklahoma and Colorado.
                  (iii) In the State of Colorado, the Ports-to-
                Plains Corridor shall generally follow--
                          (I) United States Route 287 from the 
                        border between the States of Oklahoma 
                        and Colorado to Limon; and
                          (II) Interstate Route 70 from Limon 
                        to Denver.
                  (iv) In the State of New Mexico, the Ports-
                to-Plains Corridor shall generally follow 
                United States Route 87 from the border between 
                the States of Texas and New Mexico to Raton.
          (B) The corridor designation contained in subclauses 
        (I) through (VIII) of subparagraph (A)(i) shall take 
        effect only if the Texas Transportation Commission has 
        not designated the Ports-to-Plains Corridor in Texas by 
        June 30, 2001.
          (39) United States Route 63 from Marked Tree, 
        Arkansas, to I-55.
          (40) The Greensboro Corridor from Danville, Virginia, 
        to Greensboro, North Carolina, along United States 
        Route 29.
          (41) The Falls-to-Falls Corridor--United States Route 
        53 from International Falls on the Minnesota/Canada 
        border to Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin.
          (42) The portion of Corridor V of the Appalachian 
        development highway system from Interstate Route 55 
        near Batesville, Mississippi, to the intersection with 
        Corridor X of the Appalachian development highway 
        system near Fulton, Mississippi.
          (43) The United States Route 95 Corridor from the 
        Canadian border at Eastport, Idaho, to the Oregon State 
        border.
          (44) The Louisiana Highway 1 corridor from Grand 
        Isle, Louisiana, along Louisiana Highway 1, to the 
        intersection with United States Route 90.
          (45) The United States Route 78 Corridor from 
        Memphis, Tennessee, to Corridor X of the Appalachian 
        development highway system near Fulton, Mississippi, 
        and Corridor X of the Appalachian development highway 
        system extending from near Fulton, Mississippi, to near 
        Birmingham, Alabama.
          (46) Interstate Route 710 between the terminus at 
        Long Beach, California, to California State Route 60.
          (47) Interstate Route 87 from the Quebec border to 
        New York City.
          (48) The Route 50 High Plains Corridor along the 
        United States Route 50 corridor from Newton, Kansas, to 
        Pueblo, Colorado.
          (49) The Atlantic Commerce Corridor on Interstate 
        Route 95 from Jacksonville, Florida, to Miami, Florida.
          (50) The East-West Corridor commencing in Watertown, 
        New York, continuing northeast through New York, 
        Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine, and terminating in 
        Calais, Maine.
          (51) The SPIRIT Corridor on United States Route 54 
        from El Paso, Texas, through New Mexico, Texas, and 
        Oklahoma to Wichita, Kansas.
          (52) The route in Arkansas running south of and 
        parallel to Arkansas State Highway 226 from the 
        relocation of United States Route 67 to the vicinity of 
        United States Route 49 and United States Route 63.
          (53) United States Highway Route 6 from Interstate 
        Route 70 to Interstate Route 15, Utah.
          (54) The California Farm-to-Market Corridor, 
        California State Route 99 from south of Bakersfield to 
        Sacramento, California.
          (55) In Texas, Interstate Route 20 from Interstate 
        Route 35E in Dallas County, east to the intersection of 
        Interstate Route 635, north to the intersection of 
        Interstate Route 30, northeast through Texarkana to 
        Little Rock, Arkansas, Interstate Route 40 northeast 
        from Little Rock east to the proposed Interstate Route 
        69 corridor.
          (56) In the State of Texas, the La Entrada al 
        Pacifico Corridor consisting of the following highways 
        and any portion of a highway in a corridor on 2 miles 
        of either side of the center line of the highway:
                  (A) State Route 349 from Lamesa to the point 
                on that highway that is closest to 32 degrees, 
                7 minutes, north latitude, by 102 degrees, 6 
                minutes, west longitude.
                  (B) The segment or any roadway extending from 
                the point described by subparagraph (A) to the 
                point on Farm-to-Market Road 1788 closest to 32 
                degrees, 0 minutes, north latitude, by 102 
                degrees, 16 minutes, west longitude.
                  (C) Farm-to-Market Road 1788 from the point 
                described by subparagraph (B) to its 
                intersection with Interstate Route 20.
                  (D) Interstate Route 20 from its intersection 
                with Farm-to-Market Road 1788 to its 
                intersection with United States Route 385.
                  (E) United States Route 385 from Odessa to 
                Fort Stockton, including those portions that 
                parallel United States Route 67 and Interstate 
                Route 10.
                  (F) United States Route 67 from Fort Stockton 
                to Presidio, including those portions that 
                parallel Interstate Route 10 and United States 
                Route 90.
          (57) United States Route 41 corridor between 
        Interstate Route 94 via Interstate Route 894 and 
        Highway 45 near Milwaukee and Interstate Route 43 near 
        Green Bay in the State of Wisconsin.
          (58) The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway from Rapid 
        City, South Dakota, north on United States Route 85 to 
        Williston, North Dakota, west on United States Route 2 
        to Culbertson, Montana, and north on Montana Highway 16 
        to the international border with Canada at the port of 
        Raymond, Montana.
          (59) The Central North American Trade Corridor from 
        the border between North Dakota and South Dakota, north 
        on United States Route 83 through Bismark and Minot, 
        North Dakota, to the international border with Canada.
          (60) The Providence Beltline Corridor beginning at 
        Interstate Route 95 in the vicinity of Hope Valley, 
        Rhode Island, traversing eastwardly intersecting and 
        merging into Interstate Route 295, continuing 
        northeastwardly along Interstate Route 95, and 
        terminating at the Massachusetts border, and including 
        the western bypass of Providence, Rhode Island, from 
        Interstate Route 295 to the Massachusetts border.
          (61) In the State of Missouri, the corridors 
        consisting of the following highways:
                  (A) Interstate Route 70, from Interstate 
                Route 29/35 to United States Route 61/Avenue of 
                the Saints.
                  (B) Interstate Route 72/United States Route 
                36, from the intersection with Interstate Route 
                29 to United States Route 61/Avenue of the 
                Saints.
                  (C) United States Route 67, from Interstate 
                Route 55 to the Arkansas State line.
                  (D) United States Route 65, from United 
                States Route 36/Interstate Route 72 to the 
                East-West TransAmerica corridor, at the 
                Arkansas State line.
                  (E) United States Route 63, from United 
                States Route 36 and the proposed Interstate 
                Route 72 to the East-West TransAmerica 
                corridor, at the Arkansas State line.
                  (F) United States Route 54, from the Kansas 
                State line to United States Route 61/Avenue of 
                the Saints.
          (62) The Georgia Developmental Highway System 
        Corridors identified in section 32-4-22 of the Official 
        Code of Georgia, Annotated.
          (63) The Liberty Corridor, a corridor in an area 
        encompassing very critical and significant 
        transportation infrastructure providing regional, 
        national, and international access through the State of 
        New Jersey, including Interstate Routes 95, 80, 287, 
        and 78, United States Routes 1, 9, and 46, and State 
        Routes 3 and 17, and portways and connecting 
        infrastructure.
          (64) The corridor in an area of passage in the State 
        of New Jersey serving significant interstate and 
        regional traffic, located near the cities of Camden, 
        New Jersey, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 
        including Interstate Route 295, State Route 42, United 
        States Route 130, and Interstate Routes 76 and 676.
          (65) The Interstate Route 95 Corridor beginning at 
        the New York State line and continuing through 
        Connecticut to the Rhode Island State line.
          (66) The Interstate Route 91 Corridor from New Haven, 
        Connecticut, to the Massachusetts State line.
          (67) The Fairbanks-Yukon International Corridor 
        consisting of the portion of the Alaska Highway from 
        the international border with Canada to the Richardson 
        Highway, and the Richardson Highway from its junction 
        with the Alaska Highway to Fairbanks, Alaska.
          (68) The Washoe County Corridor and the Intermountain 
        West Corridor, which shall generally follow--
                  (A) for the Washoe County Corridor, along 
                Interstate Route 580/United States Route 95/
                United States Route 95A from Reno, Nevada, to 
                Las Vegas, Nevada; and
                  (B) for the Intermountain West Corridor, from 
                the vicinity of Las Vegas, Nevada, north along 
                United States Route 95 terminating at 
                Interstate Route 80.
          (69) The Cross Valley Connector connecting Interstate 
        Route 5 and State Route 14, Santa Clarita Valley, 
        California.
          (70) The Economic Lifeline corridor, along Interstate 
        Route 15 and Interstate Route 40, California, Arizona, 
        and Nevada, including Interstate Route 215 South from 
        near San Bernadino, California, to Riverside, 
        California, and State Route 91 from Riverside, 
        California, to the intersection with Interstate Route 
        15 near Corona, California.
          (71) The High Desert Corridor/E-220 from Los Angeles, 
        California, to Las Vegas, Nevada, via Palmdale and 
        Victorville, California.
          (72) The North-South corridor, along Interstate Route 
        49 North, from Kansas City, Missouri, to Shreveport, 
        Louisiana.
          (73) The Louisiana Highway corridor, along Louisiana 
        Highway 1, from Grand Isle, Louisiana, to the 
        intersection with United States Route 90.
          (74) The portion of United States Route 90 from 
        Interstate Route 49 in Lafayette, Louisiana, to 
        Interstate Route 10 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
          (75) The Louisiana 28 corridor from Fort Polk to 
        Alexandria, Louisiana.
          (76) The portion of Interstate Route 75 from Toledo, 
        Ohio, to Cincinnati, Ohio.
          (77) The portion of United States Route 24 from the 
        Indiana/Ohio State line to Toledo, Ohio.
          (78) The portion of Interstate Route 71 from 
        Cincinnati, Ohio, to Cleveland, Ohio.
          (79) Interstate Route 376 from the Pittsburgh 
        Interchange (I/C No. 56) of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, 
        westward on Interstate Route 279, United States Route 
        22, United States Route 30, and Pennsylvania Route 60, 
        continuing past the Pittsburgh International Airport on 
        Turnpike Route 60, to the Pennsylvania Turnpike 
        (Interstate Route 76), Interchange 10, and continuing 
        north on Pennsylvania Turnpike Route 60 to Interstate 
        Route 80.
          (80) The Intercounty Connector, a new east-west 
        multimodal highway between Interstate Route 270 and 
        Interstate Route 95/United States Route 1 in Montgomery 
        and Prince George's Counties, Maryland.
          (81) United States Route 117/Interstate Route 795 
        from United States Route 70 in Goldsboro, Wayne County, 
        North Carolina, to Interstate Route 40 west of Faison, 
        Sampson County, North Carolina.
          (82) United States Route 70 from its intersection 
        with Interstate Route 40 in Garner, Wake County, North 
        Carolina, to the Port at Morehead City, Carteret 
        County, North Carolina.
          (83) The Sonoran Corridor along State Route 410 
        connecting Interstate Route 19 and Interstate Route 10 
        south of the Tucson International Airport.
          (84) The Central Texas Corridor, including the 
        route--
                  (A) commencing in the vicinity of Texas 
                Highway 338 in Odessa, Texas, running eastward 
                generally following Interstate Route 20, 
                connecting to Texas Highway 158 in the vicinity 
                of Midland, Texas, then following Texas Highway 
                158 eastward to United States Route 87 and then 
                following United States Route 87 southeastward, 
                passing in the vicinity of San Angelo, Texas, 
                and connecting to United States Route 190 in 
                the vicinity of Brady, Texas;
                  (B) commencing at the intersection of 
                Interstate Route 10 and United States Route 190 
                in Pecos County, Texas, and following United 
                States Route 190 to Brady, Texas;
                  (C) following portions of United States Route 
                190 eastward, passing in the vicinity of Fort 
                Hood, Killeen, Belton, Temple, Bryan, College 
                Station, Huntsville, Livingston, Woodville, and 
                Jasper, to the logical terminus of Texas 
                Highway 63 at the Sabine River Bridge at Burrs 
                Crossing and including a loop generally 
                encircling Bryan/College Station, Texas;
                  (D) following United States Route 83 
                southward from the vicinity of Eden, Texas, to 
                a logical connection to Interstate Route 10 at 
                Junction, Texas;
                  (E) following United States Route 69 from 
                Interstate Route 10 in Beaumont, Texas, north 
                to United States Route 190 in the vicinity of 
                Woodville, Texas;
                  (F) following United States Route 96 from 
                Interstate Route 10 in Beaumont, Texas, north 
                to United States Route 190 in the vicinity of 
                Jasper, Texas; and
                  (G) following United States Route 190, State 
                Highway 305, and United States Route 385 from 
                Interstate Route 10 in Pecos County, Texas, to 
                Interstate 20 at Odessa, Texas.
          (85) Interstate Route 81 in New York from its 
        intersection with Interstate Route 86 to the United 
        States-Canadian border.
          (86) Interstate Route 70 from Denver, Colorado, to 
        Salt Lake City, Utah.
          (87) The Oregon 99W Newberg-Dundee Bypass Route 
        between Newberg, Oregon, and Dayton, Oregon.
          (88) Interstate Route 205 in Oregon from its 
        intersection with Interstate Route 5 to the Columbia 
        River.
          (89) I-57 Corridor Extension as follows: In Arkansas, 
        the corridor shall follow United States Route 67 in 
        North Little Rock, Arkansas, from I-40 to United States 
        Route 412, then continuing generally northeast to the 
        State line, and in Missouri, the corridor shall 
        continue generally north from the Arkansas State line 
        to Poplar Bluff, Missouri, and then follow United 
        States Route 60 to I-57.
          (90) The Edward T. Breathitt Parkway from Interstate 
        24 to Interstate 69.
          (91) The Wendell H. Ford (Western Kentucky) Parkway 
        from the interchange with the William H. Natcher 
        Parkway in Ohio County, Kentucky, west to the 
        interchange of the Western Kentucky Parkway with the 
        Edward T. Breathitt (Pennyrile) Parkway.
          (92) United States Route 421 from the interchange 
        with Interstate Route 85 in Greensboro, North Carolina, 
        to the interchange with Interstate Route 95 in Dunn, 
        North Carolina.
          (93) The South Mississippi Corridor from the 
        Louisiana and Mississippi border near Natchez, 
        Mississippi, to Gulfport, Mississippi, shall generally 
        follow--
                  (A) United States Route 84 from the Louisiana 
                border at the Mississippi River passing in the 
                vicinity of Natchez, Brookhaven, Monticello, 
                Prentiss, and Collins, Mississippi, to the 
                logical terminus with Interstate Route 59 in 
                the vicinity of Laurel, Mississippi, and 
                continuing on Interstate Route 59 south to the 
                vicinity of Hattiesburg, Mississippi; and
                  (B) United States Route 49 from the vicinity 
                of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, south to 
                Interstate Route 10 in the vicinity of 
                Gulfport, Mississippi, following Mississippi 
                Route 601 south and terminating near the 
                Mississippi State Port at Gulfport.
          (94) The Kosciusko to Gulf Coast corridor commencing 
        at the logical terminus of Interstate Route 55 near 
        Vaiden, Mississippi, running south and passing east of 
        the vicinity of the Jackson Urbanized Area, connecting 
        to United States Route 49 north of Hattiesburg, 
        Mississippi, and generally following United States 
        Route 49 to a logical connection with Interstate Route 
        10 in the vicinity of Gulfport, Mississippi.
          (95) The Interstate Route 22 spur from the vicinity 
        of Tupelo, Mississippi, running south generally along 
        United States Route 45 to the vicinity of Shannon, 
        Mississippi.
          (96) The route that generally follows United States 
        Route 412 from its intersection with Interstate Route 
        35 in Noble County, Oklahoma, passing through Tulsa, 
        Oklahoma, to its intersection with Interstate Route 49 
        in Springdale, Arkansas.
          (97) The Louie B. Nunn Cumberland Expressway from the 
        interchange with Interstate Route 65 in Barren County, 
        Kentucky, east to the interchange with United States 
        Highway 27 in Somerset, Kentucky.
          (98) The route that generally follows State Route 7 
        from Grenada, Mississippi, to Holly Springs, 
        Mississippi, passing in the vicinity of Coffeeville, 
        Water Valley, Oxford, and Abbeville, Mississippi, to 
        its logical connection with Interstate Route 22 in the 
        vicinity of Holly Springs, Mississippi.
          (99) The Central Louisiana Corridor commencing at the 
        logical terminus of Louisiana Highway 8 at the Sabine 
        River Bridge at Burrs Crossing and generally following 
        portions of Louisiana Highway 8 to Leesville, 
        Louisiana, and then eastward on Louisiana Highway 28, 
        passing in the vicinity of Alexandria, Pineville, 
        Walters, and Archie, to the logical terminus of United 
        States Route 84 at the Mississippi River Bridge at 
        Vidalia, Louisiana.
          (100) The Central Mississippi Corridor, including the 
        route--
                  (A) commencing at the logical terminus of 
                United States Route 84 at the Mississippi River 
                and then generally following portions of United 
                States Route 84 passing in the vicinity of 
                Natchez, Brookhaven, Monticello, Prentiss, and 
                Collins, to Interstate Route 59 in the vicinity 
                of Laurel, Mississippi, and continuing on 
                Interstate Route 59 north to Interstate Route 
                20 and on Interstate Route 20 to the 
                Mississippi-Alabama State border; and
                  (B) commencing in the vicinity of Laurel, 
                Mississippi, running south on Interstate Route 
                59 to United States Route 98 in the vicinity of 
                Hattiesburg, connecting to United States Route 
                49 south then following United States Route 49 
                south to Interstate Route 10 in the vicinity of 
                Gulfport and following Mississippi Route 601 
                southerly terminating near the Mississippi 
                State Port at Gulfport.
          (101) The Middle Alabama Corridor including the 
        route--
                  (A) beginning at the Alabama-Mississippi 
                border generally following portions of I-20 
                until following a new interstate extension 
                paralleling United States Highway 80, 
                specifically--
                  (B) crossing Alabama Route 28 near Coatopa, 
                Alabama, traveling eastward crossing United 
                States Highway 43 and Alabama Route 69 near 
                Selma, Alabama, traveling eastwards closely 
                paralleling United States Highway 80 to the 
                south crossing over Alabama Routes 22, 41, and 
                21, until its intersection with I-65 near Hope 
                Hull, Alabama;
                  (C) continuing east along the proposed 
                Montgomery Outer Loop south of Montgomery, 
                Alabama where it would next join with I-85 east 
                of Montgomery, Alabama;
                  (D) continuing along I-85 east bound until 
                its intersection with United States Highway 280 
                near Opelika, Alabama or United States Highway 
                80 near Tuskegee, Alabama;
                  (E) generally following the most expedient 
                route until intersecting with existing United 
                States Highway 80 (JR Allen Parkway) through 
                Phenix City until continuing into Columbus, 
                Georgia.
          (102) The Middle Georgia Corridor including the 
        route--
                  (A) beginning at the Alabama-Georgia Border 
                generally following the Fall Line Freeway from 
                Columbus, Georgia to Augusta, Georgia, 
                specifically--
                  (B) travelling along United States Route 80 
                (JR Allen Parkway) through Columbus, Georgia 
                and near Fort Benning, Georgia, east to Talbot 
                County, Georgia where it would follow Georgia 
                Route 96, then commencing on Georgia Route 49C 
                (Fort Valley Bypass) to Georgia Route 49 (Peach 
                Parkway) to its intersection with Interstate 
                Route 75 in Byron, Georgia;
                  (C) continuing north along Interstate Route 
                75 through Warner Robins and Macon, Georgia 
                where it would meet Interstate Route 16, then 
                following Interstate Route 16 east it would 
                next join United States Route 80 and then onto 
                State Route 57;
                  (D) commencing with State Route 57 which 
                turns into State Route 24 near Milledgeville, 
                Georgia would then bypass Wrens, Georgia with a 
                newly constructed bypass, and after the bypass 
                it would join United States Route 1 near Fort 
                Gordon into Augusta, Georgia where it will 
                terminate at Interstate Route 520.
  (d) Inclusion on NHS.--The Secretary shall include all 
corridors identified in subsection (c) on the proposed National 
Highway System submitted to Congress under section 103(b)(3) of 
title 23, United States Code.
  (e) Provisions Applicable to Corridors.--
          (1) Long-range plan.--The Secretary, in cooperation 
        with the affected State or States, may prepare a long-
        range plan for the upgrading of each corridor to the 
        appropriate standard for highways on the National 
        Highway System. Each such plan may include a plan for 
        developing the corridor and a plan for financing the 
        development.
          (2) Feasibility studies.--The Secretary, in 
        cooperation with the affected State or States, may 
        prepare feasibility and design studies, as necessary, 
        for those corridors for which such studies have not 
        been prepared. A feasibility study may be conducted 
        under this subsection with respect to the corridor 
        described in subsection (c)(2), relating to Avenue of 
        the Saints, to determine the feasibility of an adjunct 
        to the Avenue of the Saints serving the southern St. 
        Louis metropolitan area and connecting with I-55 in the 
        vicinity of Route A in Jefferson County, Missouri. A 
        study may be conducted under this subsection to 
        determine the feasibility of constructing a more direct 
        limited access highway between Peoria and Chicago, 
        Illinois. A feasibility study may be conducted under 
        this paragraph to identify routes that will expedite 
        future emergency evacuations of coastal areas of 
        Louisiana.
          (3) Certification acceptance.--The Secretary may 
        discharge any of his responsibilities under title 23, 
        United States Code, relative to projects on a corridor 
        identified under subsection (c), upon the request of a 
        State, by accepting a certification by the State in 
        accordance with section 117 of such title.
          (4) Acceleration of projects.--To the maximum extent 
        feasible, the Secretary may use procedures for 
        acceleration of projects in carrying out projects on 
        corridors identified in subsection (c).
          (5) Inclusion of certain route segments on interstate 
        system.--
                  (A) In general.--The portions of the routes 
                referred to in subsection (c)(1), subsection 
                (c)(3) (relating solely to the Kentucky 
                Corridor), clauses (i), (ii), and (except with 
                respect to Georgetown County) (iii) of 
                subsection (c)(5)(B), subsection (c)(9), 
                subsection (c)(13), subsection (c)(18), 
                subsection (c)(20), subparagraphs (A) and 
                (B)(i) of subsection (c)(26), subsection 
                (c)(36), subsection (c)(37), clauses (i) and 
                (iv) of subsection (c)(38)(A), subsection 
                (c)(40), subsection (c)(42), subsection 
                (c)(45), subsection (c)(54), subsection 
                (c)(57), subsection (c)(68)(B), subsection 
                (c)(81), subsection (c)(82), subsection 
                (c)(83), subsection (c)(84), subsection 
                (c)(89), subsection (c)(90), subsection 
                (c)(91), subsection (c)(92), subsection 
                (c)(93)(A), subsection (c)(94), subsection 
                (c)(95), subsection (c)(96), subsection 
                (c)(97), subsection (c)(99), subsection 
                (c)(100), subsection (c)(101), and subsection 
                (c)(102) that are not a part of the Interstate 
                System are designated as future parts of the 
                Interstate System. Any segment of such routes 
                shall become a part of the Interstate System at 
                such time as the Secretary determines that the 
                segment meets the Interstate System design 
                standards approved by the Secretary under 
                section 109(b) of title 23, United States Code, 
                and is planned to connect to an existing 
                Interstate System segment by the date that is 
                25 years after the date of enactment of the 
                MAP-21.
                  (B) Interstate route 376.--
                          (i) Designation of interstate route 
                        376.--
                                  (I) In general.--The routes 
                                referred to in subsection 
                                (c)(79), except the portion of 
                                Pennsylvania Turnpike Route 60 
                                between Pennsylvania Turnpike 
                                Interchange 10 and Interstate 
                                Route 80, shall be designated 
                                as Interstate Route 376.
                                  (II) Signs.--The State of 
                                Pennsylvania shall have 
                                jurisdiction over the highways 
                                described in subclause (I) 
                                (except Pennsylvania Turnpike 
                                Route 60) and erect signs in 
                                accordance with Interstate 
                                signing criteria that identify 
                                the routes described in 
                                subclause (I) as Interstate 
                                Route 376.
                                  (III) Assistance from 
                                secretary.--The Secretary shall 
                                assist the State of 
                                Pennsylvania in carrying out, 
                                not later than December 31, 
                                2008, an activity under 
                                subclause (II) relating to 
                                Interstate Route 376 and in 
                                complying with sections 109 and 
                                139 of title 23, United States 
                                Code.
                          (ii) Other segments.--The segment of 
                        the route referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(79) located between the 
                        Pennsylvania Turnpike, Interchange 10, 
                        and Interstate Route 80 may be signed 
                        as Interstate Route 376 under clause 
                        (i)(II) if that segment meets the 
                        criteria under sections 109 and 139 of 
                        title 23, United States Code.
                  (C) Routes.--
                          (i) Designation.--The portion of the 
                        route referred to in subsection (c)(9) 
                        is designated as Interstate Route I-99. 
                        The routes referred to in subsections 
                        (c)(18) and (c)(20) shall be designated 
                        as Interstate Route I-69. A State 
                        having jurisdiction over any segment of 
                        routes referred to in subsections 
                        (c)(18) and (c)(20) shall erect signs 
                        identifying such segment that is 
                        consistent with the criteria set forth 
                        in subsections (e)(5)(A)(i) and 
                        (e)(5)(A)(ii) as Interstate Route I-69, 
                        including segments of United States 
                        Route 59 in the State of Texas. The 
                        segment identified in subsection 
                        (c)(18)(D)(i) shall be designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-69 East, and the 
                        segment identified in subsection 
                        (c)(18)(D)(ii) shall be designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-69 Central. The 
                        State of Texas shall erect signs 
                        identifying such routes as segments of 
                        future Interstate Route I-69. The 
                        portion of the route referred to in 
                        subsection (c)(36) is designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-86. The Purchase 
                        Parkway corridor referred to in 
                        subsection (c)(18)(E) shall be 
                        designated as Interstate Route 69. A 
                        State having jurisdiction over any 
                        segment of routes and/or corridors 
                        referred to in subsections (c)(18) 
                        shall erect signs identifying such 
                        segment that is consistent with the 
                        criteria set forth in subsections 
                        (e)(5)(A)(i) and (e)(5)(A)(ii) as 
                        Interstate Route 69. Notwithstanding 
                        the provisions of subsections 
                        (e)(5)(A)(i) and (e)(5)(A)(ii), or any 
                        other provisions of this Act, the 
                        Commonwealth of Kentucky shall erect 
                        signs, as approved by the Secretary, 
                        identifying the routes and/or corridors 
                        described in subsection (c)(18) for the 
                        Commonwealth, as segments of future 
                        Interstate Route 69. The routes 
                        referred to in clause (i) (other than 
                        subclauses (V)(aa) and (V)(bb) and 
                        subclause (IX)(aa) of that clause) and 
                        clause (iv) of subsection (c)(38)(A) 
                        are designated as Interstate Route I-
                        27. The route referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(aa) is designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-27E. The route 
                        referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(bb) is designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-27W. The route 
                        referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(38)(A)(i)(IX)(aa) is designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-127N. The route 
                        referred to in subsection (c)(45) is 
                        designated as Interstate Route I-22. 
                        The routes referred to in subparagraphs 
                        (A) and (B)(i) of subsection (c)(26) 
                        and in subsection (c)(68)(B) are 
                        designated as Interstate Route I-11. 
                        The route referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(84)(A) is designated as Interstate 
                        Route I-14 North. The route referred to 
                        in subsection (c)(84)(B) is designated 
                        as Interstate Route I-14 South. The 
                        Bryan/College Station, Texas loop 
                        referred to in subsection (c)(84)(C) is 
                        designated as Interstate Route I-214. 
                        The route referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(89) is designated as Interstate 
                        Route I-57. The route referred to in 
                        subsection (c)(90) is designated as 
                        Interstate Route I-169. The route 
                        referred to in subsection (c)(91) is 
                        designated as Interstate Route I-569. 
                        The route referred to in subsection 
                        (c)(97) is designated as Interstate 
                        Route I-365. The routes referred to in 
                        subsections (c)(84)(C), (c)(99), 
                        (c)(100), (c)(101), and (c)(102) are 
                        designated as Interstate Route I-14. 
                        The routes referred to in subparagraphs 
                        (D), (E), (F), and (G) of subsection 
                        (c)(84) and subparagraph (B) of 
                        subsection (c)(100) shall each be given 
                        separate Interstate route numbers.
                          (ii) Rulemaking to determine future 
                        interstate sign erection criteria.--The 
                        Secretary shall conduct a rulemaking to 
                        determine the appropriate criteria for 
                        the erection of signs for future routes 
                        on the Interstate System identified in 
                        subparagraph (A). Such rulemaking shall 
                        be undertaken in consultation with 
                        States and local officials and shall be 
                        completed not later than December 31, 
                        1998.
                  (D) Treatment of segments.--Subject to 
                subparagraph (C), segments designated as part 
                of the Interstate System by this paragraph and 
                the mileage of such segments shall be treated 
                in the manner described in the last 2 sentences 
                of section 139(a) of title 23, United States 
                Code.
                  (E) Use of funds.--
                          (i) General rule.--Funds apportioned 
                        under section 104(b)(5)(A) of title 23, 
                        United States Code, may be used on a 
                        project to construct a portion of a 
                        route referred to in this paragraph to 
                        standards set forth in section 109(b) 
                        of such title if the State determines 
                        that the project for which the funds 
                        were originally apportioned is 
                        unreasonably delayed or no longer 
                        viable.
                          (ii) Limitation.--If funds 
                        apportioned under section 104(b)(5)(A) 
                        of title 23, United States Code, for 
                        completing a segment of the Interstate 
                        System are used on a project pursuant 
                        to this subparagraph, no interstate 
                        construction funds may be made 
                        available, after the date of the 
                        enactment of this paragraph, for 
                        construction of such segment.
  (f) High Priority Segments.--Highway segments of the 
corridors referred to in subsection (c) which are described in 
this subsection are high priority segments eligible for 
assistance under this section. Subject to subsection (g)(2), 
there is authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust 
Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) for fiscal years 
1992 through 1997 to carry out a project on each such segment 
the amount listed for each such segment:


 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       AMOUNT in
                      CITY/STATE                            HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS                    millions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1.       Pennsylvania................  For the segment described in item 6 of this table and up        50.7
                                            to $11,000,000 for upgrading U.S. 220 High Priority and
                                            the Appalachian Thruway Corridor between State College
                                            and I-80................................................
    2.        Alabama, Georgia,            Upgrading of the East-West Corridor along Rt. 72 and up         25.4
              Mississippi, Tennessee.....   to $1,500,000 from the State of Alabama's share of the
                                            project for modification of the Keller Memorial Bridge
                                            in Decatur, Alabama, to a pedestrian structure..........
    3.        Missouri...................  Improvement of North-South Corridor along Highway 71,            3.6
                                            Southwestern, MO........................................
    4.        Arkansas...................  For construction of Highway 412 from Siloam Springs to          34.0
                                            Springdale, Arkansas as part of Highway 412 East-West
                                            Corridor................................................
    5.        Arkansas...................  For construction of Highway 412 from Harrison to                56.0
                                            Springdale, Arkansas as part of the Highway 412 East-
                                            West Corridor...........................................
    6.        Pennsylvania...............  To improve U.S. 220 to a 4-lane limited access highway         148.0
                                            from Bald Eagle northward to the intersection of U.S.
                                            220 and U.S. 322........................................
    7.        S. Dakota/Nebraska.........  Conduct a feasibility study of expressway from Rapid             0.64
                                            City, S. Dakota to Scotts Bluff, Nebraska...............
    8.        Alabama....................  Construction of Appalachian Highway Corridor X from             59.2
                                            Corridor V near Fulton, Mississippi to U.S. 31 at
                                            Birmingham, Alabama as part of Appalachian Highway X
                                            Corridor Project........................................
    9.        Alabama....................  For construction of a portion of Appalachian Development        25.4
                                            Corridor V from Mississippi State Line near Red Bay,
                                            Alabama to the Tennessee State Line north of Bridgeport,
                                            Alabama.................................................
   10.        West Virginia..............  Construction of Shawnee Project from 3-Corner Junction to        4.5
                                            I-77 as part of I-73/74 Corridor project................
   11.        West Virginia..............  Widening U.S. Rt. 52 from Huntington to Williamson, W.         100.0
                                            Virginia as part of the I-73/74 Corridor project........
   12.        West Virginia..............  Replacement of U.S. Rt. 52 from Williamson, W. Virginia         14.0
                                            to I-77 as part of the I-73/74 Corridor project.........
   13.        North Carolina/Virginia....  For Upgrading I-64 and Route 17 Virginia and constructing       17.8
                                            a new highway from Rocky Mount to Elizabeth City, North
                                            Carolina as part of the Raleigh-Norfolk High Priority
                                            Corridor Improvements...................................
   14.        Arkansas...................  Construction of Highway 71 between Fayetteville and Alma,      100.0
                                            Arkansas as part of the North-South High Priority
                                            Corridor................................................
   15.        Arkansas/Texas.............  For construction of Highway 71 from Alma, Arkansas to           70.0
                                            Louisiana border........................................
   16.        Michigan...................  To widen a 60 mile portion of highway M-59 from MacComb         29.6
                                            County to I-96 in Howell County, Michigan...............
   17.        South Dakota, Colorado,      To improve the Heartland Expressway from Rapid City,            29.6
              Nebraska...................   South Dakota to Scotts Bluff, Nebraska..................
   18.        Indiana....................  To construct a 4-lane highway from Lafayette to Ft.              9.5
                                            Wayne, Indiana, following existing Indiana 25 and U.S.
                                            24......................................................
   19.        Ohio/Indiana...............  Conduct feasibility and economic study to widen Rt. 24           0.32
                                            from Ft. Wayne, Indiana to Toledo, Ohio as part of the
                                            Lafayette to Toledo Corridor............................
   20.        California, Nevada, Arizona  For improvements on I-15 and I-40 in California, Nevada         59.2
                                            and Arizona ($10,500,000 of which shall be expended on
                                            the Nevada portion of the corridor, including the I-15/
                                            U.S. 95 interchange)....................................
   21.        Louisiana..................  To improve the North-South Corridor from Louisiana border       29.6
                                            to Shreveport, Louisiana, and up to $6,000,000 for
                                            surface transportation projects in Louisiana, including
                                            $4,500,000 for the I-10 and I-610 project in Jefferson
                                            Parish, Louisiana, in the corridor between the St.
                                            Charles Parish line and Tulane Avenue, $500,000 for
                                            noise analysis and safety abatement measures or barriers
                                            along the Lakeview section of I-610 in New Orleans, and
                                            $1,000,000 for 3 highway studies (including $250,000 for
                                            a study to widen United States Route 84/Louisiana Route
                                            6 traversing north Louisiana, $250,000 for a study to
                                            widen Louisiana Route 42 from United States Route 61 to
                                            Louisiana Route 44 and extend to I-10 in East Ascension
                                            Parish, and $500,000 for a study to connect I-20 on both
                                            sides of the Ouachita River)............................
   22.        Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota..  For improvements for Avenue of the Saints from St. Paul,       118.0
                                            Minnesota to St. Louis, Missouri........................
   24.        Various States.............  I-66 Transamerica Highway Feasibility study..............        1.0
   25.       Kentucky, Tennessee,          To improve Cumberland Gap Tunnel and for various                72.4
              Virginia...................   associated improvements as part of U.S. 25E Corridor,
                                            except that the allocation percentages under section
                                            1105(g)(2) of this section shall not apply to this
                                            project after fiscal year 1992..........................
   26.        Indiana, Kentucky,           To improve the Bloomington, Indiana, to Evansville,             23.7
              Tennessee..................   Indiana, segment of the Indianapolis, Indiana, to
                                            Memphis, Tennessee, high priority corridor..............
   27.        Washington.................  For improvements on the Washington State portion of the         54.5
                                            U.S. 395 corridor from the U.S.-Canadian border to Reno,
                                            Nevada..................................................
   28.        Virginia...................  Construction of a bypass of Danville, Virginia, on Route        17.0
                                            29 Corridor.............................................
   29.        Arkansas...................  Highway 412 from Harrison to Mt. Home....................       20.0
   30.       New York....................  Improvements on Route 219 between Springville to                 9.5
                                            Ellicottville in New York State.........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  (g) Provisions Relating to High Priority Segments.--
          (1) Detailed plans.--Each State in which a priority 
        segment identified under subsection (f) is located may 
        prepare a detailed plan for completion of construction 
        of such segment and for financing such construction.
          (2) Allocation percentages.--8 percent of the amount 
        allocated by subsection (f) for each high priority 
        segment authorized by subsection (f) shall be available 
        for obligation in fiscal year 1992. 18.4 percent of 
        such amount shall be available for obligation in each 
        of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.
          (3) Federal share.--The Federal share payable on 
        account of any project under subsection (f) shall be 80 
        percent of the cost thereof.
          (4) Delegation to states.--Subject to the provisions 
        of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary may 
        delegate responsibility for construction of a project 
        or projects under subsection (f) to the State in which 
        such project or projects are located upon request of 
        such State.
          (5) Advance construction.--When a State which has 
        been delegated responsibility for construction of a 
        project under this subsection--
                  (A) has obligated all funds allocated under 
                this subsection for construction of such 
                project; and
                  (B) proceeds to construct such project 
                without the aid of Federal funds in accordance 
                with all procedures and all requirements 
                applicable to such project, except insofar as 
                such procedures and requirements limit the 
                State to the construction of projects with the 
                aid of Federal funds previously allocated to 
                it;
        the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of 
        a State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of 
        the cost of construction of the project when additional 
        funds are allocated for such project under this 
        subsection.
          (6) Applicability of title 23.--Funds authorized by 
        subsection (f) and subsection (h) shall be available 
        for obligation in the same manner as if such funds were 
        apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States 
        Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of any 
        project under subsection (f) shall be determined in 
        accordance with this subsection and such funds shall 
        remain available until expended. Funds authorized by 
        subsection (f) shall not be subject to any obligation 
        limitation.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

          (8) Special Rule.--Amounts allocated by subsection 
        (f) to the State of California for improvements on I-15 
        and I-40 shall not be subject to any State or local law 
        relating to apportionment of funds available for the 
        construction or improvement of highways.
          (9) The States of South Dakota and Nebraska may, at 
        their discretion, utilize funds allocated to them for 
        the project described in section 1105(f)(17) of this 
        Act to support the Nebraska/South Dakota feasibility 
        study described in section 1105(f)(7) and may also 
        utilize funds allocated for that study for the project 
        described in section 1105(f)(17).
  (h) Authorization for Feasibility Studies.--There is 
authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary out of the 
Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) 
$8,000,000 per fiscal year for each of the fiscal years 1992 
through 1997 to carry out feasibility and design studies under 
subsection (e)(2).
  (i) Revolving Loan Fund.--
          (1) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish a 
        Priority Corridor Revolving Loan Fund.
          (2) Advances.--The Secretary shall make available as 
        repayable advances amounts from the Revolving Loan Fund 
        to States for planning and construction of corridors 
        listed in subsection (c). In making such amounts 
        available, the Secretary shall give priority to 
        segments identified in subsection (f).
          (3) Repayment of advances.--The amount of an advance 
        to a State in a fiscal year under paragraph (2) may not 
        exceed the amount of a State's estimated apportionments 
        for the National Highway System for the 2 succeeding 
        fiscal years. Advances shall be repaid (A) by reducing 
        the State's National Highway System apportionment in 
        each of the succeeding 3 fiscal years by \1/3\ of the 
        amount of the advance, or (B) by direct repayment. 
        Repayments shall be credited to the Priority Corridor 
        Revolving Loan Fund.
          (4) Authorization.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated to the Secretary, out of the Highway Trust 
        Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account), $40,000,000 
        per fiscal year for each of fiscal years 1993 through 
        1997 to carry out this subsection.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *


                                  [all]