[House Report 117-397]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


117th Congress    }                                  {   Rept. 117-397
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session       }                                  {       Part 2

======================================================================

 
        NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023

                                _______
                                

  July 7, 2022.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Smith of Washington, from the Committee on Armed Services, 
                        submitted the following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 7900]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

     This supplemental report shows the cost estimate of the 
Congressional Budget Office with respect to the bill (H.R. 
7900), as reported, which was not included in part 1 of the 
report submitted by the Committee on Armed Services on July 1, 
2022 (H. Rept. 117-397, pt. 1).

                  Congressional Budget Office Estimate

    In compliance with clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the House 
of Representatives, the cost estimate prepared by the 
Congressional Budget Office and submitted pursuant to section 
402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is as follows:

                                     U.S. Congress,
                               Congressional Budget Office,
                                      Washington, DC, July 6, 2022.
Hon. Adam Smith,
Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office has 
prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 7900, the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023.
    If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be 
pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Matt Schmit.
            Sincerely,
                                         Phillip L. Swagel,
                                                          Director.
    Enclosure.

    	    [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    

    The bill would
           Authorize appropriations in 2023 totaling 
        $838.8 billion for the military functions of the 
        Department of Defense and for the Department of 
        Energy's atomic energy defense activities
           Authorize appropriations in 2023 totaling 
        $1.4 billion for nondefense activities, mainly for the 
        Maritime Administration
           Prescribe personnel levels for the U.S. 
        Armed Forces and make changes to compensation and 
        benefits for military personnel and their families
           Prescribe changes to various acquisition 
        programs and authorities of the Department of Defense 
        and Maritime Administration
           Require the Navy and the Air Force to 
        privatize transient lodging
           Expand two existing private-sector mandates 
        by prohibiting entities from collecting excess interest 
        and fees on some debt held by military dependents and 
        requiring reports on financial activity

Bill summary

    H.R.7900 would authorize appropriations totaling $840.2 
billion for fiscal year 2023. Nearly all of that amount, $838.8 
billion, would be specifically authorized for the military 
functions of the Department of Defense (DoD) and for the atomic 
energy defense activities of the Department of Energy. CBO 
estimates that appropriation of the authorized amounts would 
result in outlays of $810.1 billion over the 2023-2027 period.
    In addition, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 7900 would 
have insignificant effects on direct spending and revenues over 
the 2023-2032 period. One section affecting military lodging, 
effective 11 years after enactment, would increase direct 
spending by more than $5 billion in the 10-year period 
beginning in 2033.

Estimated Federal cost

    The estimated budgetary effects of H.R. 7900 are shown in 
Table 1. Of the $840.2 billion that would be authorized for 
2023, nearly all--$838.8 billion--would be for activities 
within budget function 050 (national defense).
    The other $1.4 billion would fall within budget functions 
400 (transportation), 700 (veterans benefits and services); and 
270 (energy).

Basis of estimate

    For this estimate, CBO assumes that H.R. 7900 will be 
enacted near the start of fiscal year 2023 and that the 
authorized amounts will be appropriated each fiscal year. 
Outlays for existing programs were estimated using historical 
spend-out rates.

Spending subject to appropriation

    H.R. 7900 would specifically authorize appropriations 
totaling $840.2 billion for 2023.
    The $838.8 billion that would be authorized for defense 
programs includes:
           $317.3 billion for operation and maintenance 
        (including revolving funds);
           $174.5 billion for military personnel;
           $161.3 billion for procurement;
           $138.6 billion for research and development;
           $30.5 billion for atomic energy activities; 
        and
           $16.5 billion for military construction and 
        family housing.
    In total, the amount that would be authorized for defense 
programs in 2023 is $33.8 billion (or 4 percent) more than the 
$805 billion appropriated to date for 2022. The amount 
appropriated for 2022 includes $34 billion in emergency 
funding--$26.6 billion provided in response to the situation in 
Ukraine and $7.4 billion provided to assist Afghan refugees and 
to respond to natural disasters.
    Excluding that emergency funding, H.R. 7900 would authorize 
$67.9 billion more than was appropriated for 2022, an increase 
of 9 percent. Authorizations for all categories of spending 
would increase--military personnel by $7.7 billion (5 percent), 
operation and maintenance by $20.6 billion (7 percent), 
procurement by $16.4 billion (11 percent), research and 
development by $19.9 billion (17 percent), military 
construction and family housing by $1.6 billion (11 percent), 
and atomic energy activities by $1.7 billion (6 percent).
    The $1.4 billion that would be authorized for nondefense 
programs includes the following amounts:
           $1,071 million for the Maritime 
        Administration;\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\H.R. 7900 specifically authorizes $1,449 million for the 
Maritime Administration in 2023. However, CBO excludes $378 million 
that would be specifically authorized for the Maritime Security Program 
and Tanker Security Program from the calculation above because that 
amount is already authorized under current law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
           $168 million for a medical facility 
        demonstration fund that is jointly managed by the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs and DoD;
           $152 million for the Armed Forces Retirement 
        Home; and
           $13 million for the Naval Petroleum 
        Reserves.
    Other provisions in the bill would affect the costs of 
defense programs in 2024 and future years but would not 
specifically authorize appropriations for those years. CBO 
expects authorizations of appropriations for those provisions 
would be provided in subsequent defense authorization acts and 
have not estimated the costs of those provisions for this 
estimate.

Direct spending and revenues

    Several provisions in H.R. 7900, described below, would 
affect direct spending and revenues. CBO estimates the net 
effects of those provisions would not be significant over the 
2023-2032 period, generally because they would affect very few 
people, would have offsetting effects, or involve transactions 
of very small amounts.
           Section 524 would permanently prohibit DoD 
        from discharging service members, solely based on their 
        COVID-19 vaccination status, with a discharge 
        characterization of anything except honorable or 
        general under honorable conditions. Veterans must be 
        honorably discharged to use certain education benefits 
        from the Department of Veterans Affairs that are paid 
        from mandatory appropriations.
           Sections 535, 555, 778, 841, 1221, 1222, and 
        3512 would extend or modify agencies' authority to 
        accept amounts from nonfederal entities for various 
        purposes. In most cases, the amounts may be spent 
        without further appropriation.
           Sections 705 and 706 would change payment 
        rates and out-of-pocket costs for certain goods and 
        services covered by the Military Health System, which 
        would affect the cost of providing health benefits to 
        retirees of the other uniformed services (U.S. Coast 
        Guard, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
        and Public Health Service) and their dependents. Those 
        benefits are paid from mandatory appropriations.
           Sections 541 and 5701 would make it easier 
        for service members and federal civilian employees to 
        prove they were subjected to unlawful reprisal. Some of 
        those people would receive retroactive pay and 
        benefits. Section 806 could also increase the amount of 
        administrative fees collected by the judiciary. Those 
        fees are recorded as revenues and can be spent without 
        further appropriation.
           Sections 581 and 582 would authorize awards 
        of the Medal of Honor that would not occur under 
        current law. Recipients who are living receive monthly 
        pensions that are paid from mandatory appropriations.
           Section 641 would allow certain former 
        spouses of service members to retain eligibility to 
        shop at commissary stores, which would increase the 
        number of credit and debit card transactions processed. 
        The processing costs for those transactions are paid 
        from mandatory appropriations.
           Section 624 would permit military retirees 
        who have service-connected disabilities rated as 
        totally disabling and who previously discontinued their 
        enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan to reenroll. 
        Based on information from DoD, CBO expects the net 
        change in direct spending resulting from additional 
        premiums paid by retirees and additional benefits paid 
        to survivors would be insignificant.
           Sections 1211 and 5801 would expand 
        eligibility for the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa 
        program. CBO expects that all visas authorized under 
        current law will be used. Therefore, the provisions 
        might accelerate when visas are provided, but it would 
        not increase how many are provided.
           Section 5204 would waive application fees 
        for two immigration benefits if the applicant is the 
        parent, spouse, or minor child of a service member who 
        was awarded the Purple Heart.
           Section 5802 would allow qualified 
        Portuguese nationals to be admitted into the United 
        States as nonimmigrant (temporary) traders or 
        investors. Those nonimmigrants would be eligible for 
        health insurance subsidies from the federal government 
        if they otherwise qualify. Those subsidies are 
        classified as either an increase in direct spending or 
        a reduction in revenue.
           Section 362 would extend from 2023 to 2025 
        DoD's authority to use working capital funds for minor 
        construction projects at military depots. Those funds 
        are authorized to use contract authority, which is a 
        form of direct spending that allows agencies to incur 
        obligations in advance of appropriations.
           Section 3524 would authorize the government 
        to seize property of individuals in violation of 
        agreements to transport cargo on behalf of federal 
        agencies. Proceeds from the sale of such assets are 
        recorded as revenues, deposited into the Assets 
        Forfeiture Fund, and later spent without further 
        appropriation.
           Section 5301 would increase retirement 
        benefits for some members of the U.S. Coast Guard. 
        Those benefits are paid from mandatory appropriations.
           Sections 5601 through 5675 would amend the 
        Inspector General Act of 1978. The changes would 
        increase collections of fines and penalties, which are 
        recorded as revenues, some of which can be spent 
        without further appropriation. It would also increase 
        fees collected and spent by some agencies that are 
        financed with nonappropriated funds.
           Sections 2851, 2853, 2854, and 2855 would 
        authorize the conveyance of several parcels of land to 
        nonfederal entities. DoD could be reimbursed for 
        administrative costs and could also receive cash 
        compensation for the value of the property, which could 
        be spent without further appropriation.

Pay-As-You-Go considerations

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget-
reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting 
direct spending or revenues. CBO estimates that the net effects 
of H.R. 7900 on direct spending and revenues would be 
insignificant over the 2023-2032 period.

Increase in long-term deficits

    Section 2814 would require the Navy and the Air Force to 
privatize transient military lodging facilities within the 
United States over a 4-year period beginning 11 years after 
enactment. CBO considers military lodging run by private 
entities to be a governmental activity that uses a private-
sector financial intermediary to serve as an instrument of the 
federal government. In CBO's view, investments by those 
entities to improve the lodging facilities should be treated as 
governmental expenditures because most of the income for the 
project would be paid from appropriated funds such as per diem 
payments to service members. Because those investments would 
not be contingent on the availability of appropriated funds at 
the time they are made, CBO classifies them as direct spending.
    Using information on the reported costs to improve 
privatized Army lodging, CBO estimates that enacting section 
2814 would increase direct spending by more than $5 billion in 
the 10-year period beginning in 2033.

Mandates

    H.R. 7900 would impose private-sector mandates as defined 
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). CBO estimates that 
the total cost of the mandates on private entities would not 
exceed the annual threshold established in UMRA for private-
sector mandates ($184 million in 2022, adjusted annually for 
inflation). The bill would not impose intergovernmental 
mandates as defined in UMRA.

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

    Section 5101 would limit the rate of interest that may be 
assessed on the debt of military dependents, an expansion of an 
existing mandate. Under current law, private entities in the 
United States are prohibited from collecting more than six 
percent in interest, fees, and other charges on debt held by 
service members and their spouses, including some reservists 
who are activated. The prohibition applies to credit card and 
loan debt incurred prior to the start of military service and 
remains in effect while the service member is on active duty. 
The protection on mortgage interest and fees continues for one 
year after active-duty service.
    Under the bill, military dependents also would receive the 
same protections. Dependents generally include adult children 
under 23 years of age who are pursing post-secondary coursework 
and other adult dependents, such as parents, grandparents, 
former spouses, siblings, and disabled older children. CBO 
estimates that about 8,000 dependents of active-duty service 
members, most of whom are parents, grandparents, and older 
adult children, could become eligible for protections under the 
Act. Dependents of reservists who are activated also could 
become eligible. However, because the protections are generally 
limited to periods of active-duty service, dependents of 
reservists who are activated would receive limited benefits 
during peacetime.
    The cost of the mandate would be any revenue lost as a 
result. CBO expects this will most directly affect private 
entities holding debt that historically carries interest rates 
of more than 6 percent. That would include credit card debt, 
motor vehicle loans, and private student loans. CBO estimates 
private entities would forgo several millions of dollars each 
year in uncollectable interest, fees, and other charges as a 
result of expanding interest rate protections for military 
dependents.

Expansion of the Bank Secrecy Act

    Section 5104 would require certified public accountants, 
art dealers, auction houses, and attorneys and notaries 
involved in financial activity to comply with reporting 
requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. CBO estimates that the 
cost for those mandated entities to comply would be small 
because under existing federal and state laws several affected 
entities are already adhering to some provisions of the Bank 
Secrecy Act. Further, entities can meet reporting requirements 
under the Act (specifically for cash transactions exceeding 
$10,000) through a free electronic system maintained by the 
federal government.

Estimate prepared by

    Federal Costs: Caroline Dorminey (Weapons Procurement); 
Aaron Krupkin (Maritime Administration and Coast Guard); 
William Ma (Operation and Maintenance and Military Justice); 
Christopher Mann (Military Construction and Family Housing); 
Matthew Pickford (General Government); Aldo Prosperi (Research 
and Development); David Rafferty (Military Retirement and 
Immigration); Dawn Sauter Regan (Military and Civilian 
Personnel); Matt Schmit (Specified Authorizations and Military 
Health System).
    Mandates: Brandon Lever, Rachel Austin, and Fiona 
Forrester.

Estimate reviewed by

    David Newman, Chief, Defense, International Affairs, and 
Veterans' Affairs Cost Estimates Unit; Kathleen FitzGerald, 
Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit; Leo Lex, Deputy 
Director of Budget Analysis; Theresa Gullo, Director of Budget 
Analysis.

TABLE 1.--ESTIMATED BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF H.R. 7900, AS REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ON JULY
                                                     1, 2022
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            By fiscal year, millions of dollars--
                                            --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              2022     2023      2024      2025      2026      2027    2022-2027
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Increases in Spending Subject to Appropriation
 
Specified Authorizations for Defense
 Appropriations
    Authorization Level....................       0   838,789         0         0         0         0    838,789
    Estimated Outlays......................       0   484,281   206,029    68,655    34,954    14,960    808,879
Specified Authorizations for Nondefense
 Appropriations
    Authorization Level....................       0     1,404         0         0         0         0      1,404
    Estimated Outlays......................       0       416       148       162       229       261      1,216
    Total Changes
        Authorization Level................       0   840,193         0         0         0         0    840,193
        Estimated Outlays..................       0   484,697   206,177    68,817    35,183    15,221    810,095
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amounts shown here would be specifically authorized by the bill. Some provisions in the bill would affect
  the costs of programs in 2024 and future years but would not specifically authorize appropriations for those
  years. CBO did not estimate the costs of those provisions, although we expect authorizations of appropriations
  for those provisions would be provided in subsequent defense authorization acts.

                                  
                                  
                                  [all]