[House Report 113-716]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Union Calendar No. 547
113th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - -- - - - House Report 113-716
ACTIVITY REPORT
of the
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
of the
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
for the
SECOND SESSION
ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS
together with
MINORITY VIEWS
December 23, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Union Calendar No. 547
113th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Report 113-716
ACTIVITY REPORT
of the
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
of the
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
for the
SECOND SESSION
ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS
together with
MINORITY VIEWS
December 23, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
----------
House of Representatives,
Committee on Energy and Commerce,
Washington, DC, December 23, 2014.
Hon. Karen L. Haas,
Clerk, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Ms. Haas: Pursuant to clause 1(d) of Rule XI of the
Rules of the House of Representatives, I present herewith a
report on the activity of the Committee on Energy and Commerce
for the 113th Congress, including the Committee's review and
study of legislation within its jurisdiction and the oversight
activities undertaken by the Committee.
Sincerely,
Fred Upton,
Chairman.
C O N T E N T S
----------
Page
Jurisdiction..................................................... 1
Rules for the Committee.......................................... 3
Membership and Organization...................................... 11
Legislative and Oversight Activity............................... 19
Summary of Committee Activities.................................. 19
Full Committee................................................... 21
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade............. 23
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.................. 37
Subcommittee on Energy and Power............................... 53
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.................... 89
Subcommittee on Health......................................... 105
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations................... 167
Oversight Plan for the Committee................................. 178
Public Laws...................................................... 186
Hearings Held Pursuant to Clauses 2(n), (o), or (p) of Rule XI... 187
Printed Hearings................................................. 189
Minority Views................................................... 197
Union Calendar No. 547
113th Congress } { Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2d Session } { 113-716
======================================================================
ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE OF THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE SECOND SESSION OF THE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH
CONGRESS
_______
December 23, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
_______
Mr. Upton, from the Committee on Energy and Commerce,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
together with
MINORITY VIEWS
Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction of the Committee on Energy and Commerce,
as prescribed by Clause 1(f) of rule X of the Rules of the
House of Representatives, is as follows:
(1) Biomedical research and development.
(2) Consumer affairs and consumer protection.
(3) Health and health facilities (except health care
supported by payroll deductions).
(4) Interstate energy compacts.
(5) Interstate and foreign commerce generally.
(6) Exploration, production, storage, supply, marketing,
pricing, and regulation of energy resources, including all
fossil fuels, solar energy, and other unconventional or
renewable energy resources.
(7) Conservation of energy resources.
(8) Energy information generally.
(9) The generation and marketing of power (except by
Federally chartered or Federal regional power marketing
authorities); reliability and interstate transmission of, and
ratemaking for, all power; and siting of generation facilities
(except the installation of interconnections between Government
waterpower projects).
(10) General management of the Department of Energy and
management and all functions of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
(11) National energy policy generally.
(12) Public health and quarantine.
(13) Regulation of the domestic nuclear energy industry,
including regulation of research and development reactors and
nuclear regulatory research.
(14) Regulation of interstate and foreign communications.
(15) Travel and tourism.
The committee shall have the same jurisdiction with respect to
regulation of nuclear facilities and of use of nuclear energy
as it has with respect to regulation of nonnuclear facilities
and of use of nonnuclear energy.
In addition, clause 3(e) of rule X of the Rules of the
House of Representatives provides that the Committee on Energy
and Commerce shall review and study on a continuing basis laws,
programs, and Government activities relating to nuclear and
other energy and nonmilitary nuclear energy research and
development including the disposal of nuclear waste.
Rules for the Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of
Representatives, 113th Congress
Rule 1. General Provisions
(a) Rules of the Committee. The Rules of the House are the
rules of the Committee on Energy and Commerce (the
``Committee'') and its subcommittees so far as is applicable.
(b) Rules of the Subcommittees. Each subcommittee of the
Committee is part of the Committee and is subject to the
authority and direction of the Committee and to its rules so
far as is applicable. Written rules adopted by the Committee,
not inconsistent with the Rules of the House, shall be binding
on each subcommittee of the Committee.
Rule 2. Meetings
(a) Regular Meeting Days. The Committee shall meet on the
fourth Tuesday of each month at 10:00 a.m., for the
consideration of bills, resolutions, and other business, if the
House is in session on that day. If the House is not in session
on that day and the Committee has not met during such month,
the Committee shall meet at the earliest practicable
opportunity when the House is again in session. The chairman of
the Committee may, at his discretion, cancel, delay, or defer
any meeting required under this section, after consultation
with the ranking minority member.
(b) Additional Meetings. The chairman may call and convene,
as he considers necessary, additional meetings of the Committee
for the consideration of any bill or resolution pending before
the Committee or for the conduct of other Committee business.
The Committee shall meet for such purposes pursuant to that
call of the chairman.
(c) Notice. The date, time, place, and subject matter of
any meeting of the Committee scheduled on a Tuesday, Wednesday,
or Thursday when the House will be in session shall be
announced at least 36 hours (exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays,
and legal holidays except when the House is in session on such
days) in advance of the commencement of such meeting. The date,
time, place, and subject matter of other meetings when the
House is in session shall be announced to allow Members to have
at least three days notice (exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays,
and legal holidays except when the House is in session on such
days) of such meeting. The date, time, place, and subject
matter of all other meetings shall be announced at least 72
hours in advance of the commencement of such meeting.
(d) Agenda. The agenda for each Committee meeting, setting
out all items of business to be considered, shall be provided
to each member of the Committee at least 36 hours in advance of
such meeting.
(e) Availability of Texts. No bill, recommendation, or
other matter shall be considered by the Committee unless the
text of the matter, together with an explanation, has been
available to members of the Committee for three days (or 24
hours in the case of a substitute for introduced legislation).
Such explanation shall include a summary of the major
provisions of the legislation, an explanation of the
relationship of the matter to present law, and a summary of the
need for the legislation.
(f) Waiver. The requirements of subsections (c), (d), and
(e) may be waived by a majority of those present and voting (a
majority being present) of the Committee or by the chairman
with the concurrence of the ranking member, as the case may be.
Rule 3. Hearings
(a) Notice. The date, time, place, and subject matter of
any hearing of the Committee shall be announced at least one
week in advance of the commencement of such hearing, unless a
determination is made in accordance with clause 2(g)(3) of rule
XI of the Rules of the House that there is good cause to begin
the hearing sooner.
(b) Memorandum. Each member of the Committee shall be
provided, except in the case of unusual circumstances, with a
memorandum at least 48 hours before each hearing explaining (1)
the purpose of the hearing and (2) the names of any witnesses.
(c) Witnesses. (1) Each witness who is to appear before the
Committee shall file with the clerk of the Committee, at least
two working days in advance of his or her appearance,
sufficient copies, as determined by the chairman of the
Committee of a written statement of his or her proposed
testimony to provide to members and staff of the Committee, the
news media, and the general public. Each witness shall, to the
greatest extent practicable, also provide a copy of such
written testimony in an electronic format prescribed by the
chairman. Each witness shall limit his or her oral presentation
to a brief summary of the argument. The chairman of the
Committee or the presiding member may waive the requirements of
this paragraph or any part thereof.
(2) To the greatest extent practicable, the written
testimony of each witness appearing in a nongovernmental
capacity shall include a curriculum vitae and a disclosure of
the amount and source (by agency and program) of any Federal
grant (or subgrant thereof) or contract (or subcontract
thereof) received during the current fiscal year or either of
the two preceding fiscal years by the witness or by an entity
represented by the witness.
(d) Questioning. (1) The right to interrogate the witnesses
before the Committee shall alternate between majority and
minority members. Each member shall be limited to 5 minutes in
the interrogation of witnesses until such time as each member
who so desires has had an opportunity to question witnesses. No
member shall be recognized for a second period of 5 minutes to
interrogate a witness until each member of the Committee
present has been recognized once for that purpose. The chairman
shall recognize in order of appearance members who were not
present when the meeting was called to order after all members
who were present when the meeting was called to order have been
recognized in the order of seniority on the Committee.
(2) The chairman, with the concurrence of the ranking
minority member, or the Committee by motion, may permit an
equal number of majority and minority members to question a
witness for a specified, total period that is equal for each
side and not longer than thirty minutes for each side. The
chairman with the concurrence of the ranking minority member,
or the Committee by motion, may also permit committee staff of
the majority and minority to question a witness for a
specified, total period that is equal for each side and not
longer than thirty minutes for each side.
(3) Each member may submit to the chairman of the Committee
additional questions for the record, to be answered by the
witnesses who have appeared. Each member shall provide a copy
of the questions in an electronic format to the clerk of the
Committee no later than ten business days following a hearing.
The chairman shall transmit all questions received from members
of the Committee to the appropriate witness and include the
transmittal letter and the responses from the witnesses in the
hearing record. After consultation with the ranking minority
member, the chairman is authorized to close the hearing record
no earlier than 120 days from the date the questions were
transmitted to the appropriate witness.
Rule 4. Vice Chairmen; Presiding Member
The chairman shall designate a member of the majority party
to serve as vice chairman of the Committee, and shall designate
a majority member of each subcommittee to serve as vice
chairman of each subcommittee. The vice chairman of the
Committee or subcommittee, as the case may be, shall preside at
any meeting or hearing during the temporary absence of the
chairman. If the chairman and vice chairman of the Committee or
subcommittee are not present at any meeting or hearing, the
ranking member of the majority party who is present shall
preside at the meeting or hearing.
Rule 5. Open Proceedings
Except as provided by the Rules of the House, each meeting
and hearing of the Committee for the transaction of business,
including the markup of legislation, and each hearing, shall be
open to the public, including to radio, television, and still
photography coverage, consistent with the provisions of rule XI
of the Rules of the House.
Rule 6. Quorum
Testimony may be taken and evidence received at any hearing
at which there are present not fewer than two members of the
Committee in question. A majority of the members of the
Committee shall constitute a quorum for those actions for which
the House Rules require a majority quorum. For the purposes of
taking any other action, one-third of the members of the
Committee shall constitute a quorum.
Rule 7. Official Committee Records
(a)(1) Journal. The proceedings of the Committee shall be
recorded in a journal which shall, among other things, show
those present at each meeting, and include a record of the vote
on any question on which a record vote is demanded and a
description of the amendment, motion, order, or other
proposition voted. A copy of the journal shall be furnished to
the ranking minority member.
(2) Record Votes. A record vote may be demanded by one-
fifth of the members present or, in the apparent absence of a
quorum, by any one member. No demand for a record vote shall be
made or obtained except for the purpose of procuring a record
vote or in the apparent absence of a quorum. The result of each
record vote in any meeting of the Committee shall be made
publicly available in electronic form on the Committee's
website and in the Committee office for inspection by the
public, as provided in rule XI, clause 2(e) of the Rules of the
House, within 24 hours. Such result shall include a description
of the amendment, motion, order, or other proposition, the name
of each member voting for and each member voting against such
amendment, motion, order, or proposition, and the names of
those members of the committee present but not voting. The
chairman, with the concurrence of the ranking minority member,
may from time to time postpone record votes ordered on
amendments to be held at a time certain during the
consideration of legislation.
(b) Archived Records. The records of the Committee at the
National Archives and Records Administration shall be made
available for public use in accordance with rule VII of the
Rules of the House. The chairman shall notify the ranking
minority member of any decision, pursuant to clause 3 (b)(3) or
clause 4 (b) of the Rule, to withhold a record otherwise
available, and the matter shall be presented to the Committee
for a determination on the written request of any member of the
Committee. The chairman shall consult with the ranking minority
member on any communication from the Archivist of the United
States or the Clerk of the House concerning the disposition of
noncurrent records pursuant to clause 3(b) of the Rule.
Rule 8. Subcommittees
(a) Establishment. There shall be such standing
subcommittees with such jurisdiction and size as determined by
the majority party caucus of the Committee. The jurisdiction,
number, and size of the subcommittees shall be determined by
the majority party caucus prior to the start of the process for
establishing subcommittee chairmanships and assignments.
(b) Powers and Duties. Each subcommittee is authorized to
meet, hold hearings, receive testimony, mark up legislation,
and report to the Committee on all matters referred to it.
Subcommittee chairmen shall set hearing and meeting dates only
with the approval of the chairman of the Committee with a view
toward assuring the availability of meeting rooms and avoiding
simultaneous scheduling of Committee and subcommittee meetings
or hearings whenever possible.
(c) Ratio of Subcommittees. The majority caucus of the
Committee shall determine an appropriate ratio of majority to
minority party members for each subcommittee and the chairman
shall negotiate that ratio with the minority party, provided
that the ratio of party members on each subcommittee shall be
no less favorable to the majority than that of the full
Committee, nor shall such ratio provide for a majority of less
than two majority members.
(d) Selection of Subcommittee Members. Prior to any
organizational meeting held by the Committee, the majority and
minority caucuses shall select their respective members of the
standing subcommittees.
(e) Ex Officio Members. The chairman and ranking minority
member of the Committee shall be ex officio members with voting
privileges of each subcommittee of which they are not assigned
as members and may be counted for purposes of establishing a
quorum in such subcommittees. The minority chairman emeritus
shall be an ex officio member without voting privileges of each
subcommittee of which the minority chairman emeritus is not
assigned as a member and shall not be counted for purposes of
establishing a quorum on any such subcommittee.
Rule 9. Opening Statements
(a) Written Statements. All written opening statements at
hearings and business meetings conducted by the committee shall
be made part of the permanent record.
(b) Length. (1) At full committee hearings, the chairman
and ranking minority member shall be limited to 5 minutes each
for an opening statement, and may designate another member to
give an opening statement of not more than 5 minutes. At
subcommittee hearings, the subcommittee chairman and ranking
minority member of the subcommittee shall be limited to 5
minutes each for an opening statement. In addition, the full
committee chairman and ranking minority member shall each be
allocated 5 minutes for an opening statement for themselves or
their designees.
(2) At any business meeting of the Committee, statements
shall be limited to 5 minutes each for the chairman and ranking
minority member (or their respective designee) of the Committee
or subcommittee, as applicable, and 3 minutes each for all
other members. The chairman may further limit opening
statements for Members (including, at the discretion of the
Chairman, the chairman and ranking minority member) to one
minute.
Rule 10. Reference of Legislation and Other Matters
All legislation and other matters referred to the Committee
shall be referred to the subcommittee of appropriate
jurisdiction within two weeks of the date of receipt by the
Committee unless action is taken by the full Committee within
those two weeks, or by majority vote of the members of the
Committee, consideration is to be by the full Committee. In the
case of legislation or other matter within the jurisdiction of
more than one subcommittee, the chairman of the Committee may,
in his discretion, refer the matter simultaneously to two or
more subcommittees for concurrent consideration, or may
designate a subcommittee of primary jurisdiction and also refer
the matter to one or more additional subcommittees for
consideration in sequence (subject to appropriate time
limitations), either on its initial referral or after the
matter has been reported by the subcommittee of primary
jurisdiction. Such authority shall include the authority to
refer such legislation or matter to an ad hoc subcommittee
appointed by the chairman, with the approval of the Committee,
from the members of the subcommittees having legislative or
oversight jurisdiction.
Rule 11. Managing Legislation on the House Floor
The chairman, in his discretion, shall designate which
member shall manage legislation reported by the Committee to
the House.
Rule 12. Committee Professional and Clerical Staff Appointments
(a) Delegation of Staff. Whenever the chairman of the
Committee determines that any professional staff member
appointed pursuant to the provisions of clause 9 of rule X of
the House of Representatives, who is assigned to such chairman
and not to the ranking minority member, by reason of such
professional staff member's expertise or qualifications will be
of assistance to one or more subcommittees in carrying out
their assigned responsibilities, he may delegate such member to
such subcommittees for such purpose. A delegation of a member
of the professional staff pursuant to this subsection shall be
made after consultation with subcommittee chairmen and with the
approval of the subcommittee chairman or chairmen involved.
(b) Minority Professional Staff. Professional staff members
appointed pursuant to clause 9 of rule X of the House of
Representatives, who are assigned to the ranking minority
member of the Committee and not to the chairman of the
Committee, shall be assigned to such Committee business as the
minority party members of the Committee consider advisable.
(c) Additional Staff Appointments. In addition to the
professional staff appointed pursuant to clause 9 of rule X of
the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee
shall be entitled to make such appointments to the professional
and clerical staff of the Committee as may be provided within
the budget approved for such purposes by the Committee. Such
appointee shall be assigned to such business of the full
Committee as the chairman of the Committee considers advisable.
(d) Sufficient Staff. The chairman shall ensure that
sufficient staff is made available to each subcommittee to
carry out its responsibilities under the rules of the
Committee.
(e) Fair Treatment of Minority Members in Appointment of
Committee Staff. The chairman shall ensure that the minority
members of the Committee are treated fairly in appointment of
Committee staff.
(f) Contracts for Temporary or Intermittent Services. Any
contract for the temporary services or intermittent service of
individual consultants or organizations to make studies or
advise the Committee or its subcommittees with respect to any
matter within their jurisdiction shall be deemed to have been
approved by a majority of the members of the Committee if
approved by the chairman and ranking minority member of the
Committee. Such approval shall not be deemed to have been given
if at least one-third of the members of the Committee request
in writing that the Committee formally act on such a contract,
if the request is made within 10 days after the latest date on
which such chairman or chairmen, and such ranking minority
member or members, approve such contract.
Rule 13. Supervision, Duties of Staff
(a) Supervision of Majority Staff. The professional and
clerical staff of the Committee not assigned to the minority
shall be under the supervision and direction of the chairman
who, in consultation with the chairmen of the subcommittees,
shall establish and assign the duties and responsibilities of
such staff members and delegate such authority as he determines
appropriate.
(b) Supervision of Minority Staff. The professional and
clerical staff assigned to the minority shall be under the
supervision and direction of the minority members of the
Committee, who may delegate such authority as they determine
appropriate.
Rule 14. Committee Budget
(a) Administration of Committee Budget. The chairman of the
Committee, in consultation with the ranking minority member,
shall for the 113th Congress attempt to ensure that the
Committee receives necessary amounts for professional and
clerical staff, travel, investigations, equipment and
miscellaneous expenses of the Committee and the subcommittees,
which shall be adequate to fully discharge the Committee's
responsibilities for legislation and oversight.
(b) Monthly Expenditures Report. Committee members shall be
furnished a copy of each monthly report, prepared by the
chairman for the Committee on House Administration, which shows
expenditures made during the reporting period and cumulative
for the year by the Committee and subcommittees, anticipated
expenditures for the projected Committee program, and detailed
information on travel.
Rule 15. Broadcasting of Committee Hearings
Any meeting or hearing that is open to the public may be
covered in whole or in part by radio or television or still
photography, subject to the requirements of clause 4 of rule XI
of the Rules of the House. The coverage of any hearing or other
proceeding of the Committee or any subcommittee thereof by
television, radio, or still photography shall be under the
direct supervision of the chairman of the Committee, the
subcommittee chairman, or other member of the Committee
presiding at such hearing or other proceeding and may be
terminated by such member in accordance with the Rules of the
House.
Rule 16. Subpoenas and Interviews
(a) Subpoenas. The chairman of the Committee may, after
consultation with the ranking minority member, authorize and
issue a subpoena under clause 2(m) of rule XI of the House. If
the ranking minority member objects to the proposed subpoena in
writing, the matter shall be referred to the Committee for
resolution. The chairman of the Committee may authorize and
issue subpoenas without referring the matter to the Committee
for resolution during any period for which the House has
adjourned for a period in excess of 3 days when, in the opinion
of the chairman, authorization and issuance of the subpoena is
necessary. The chairman shall report to the members of the
Committee on the authorization and issuance of a subpoena
during the recess period as soon as practicable but in no event
later than one week after service of such subpoena.
(b) Interviews. The chairman of the Committee may authorize
committee staff to conduct transcribed interviews in the
furtherance of a Committee investigation.
Rule 17. Travel of Members and Staff
(a) Approval of Travel. Consistent with the primary expense
resolution and such additional expense resolutions as may have
been approved, travel to be reimbursed from funds set aside for
the Committee for any member or any staff member shall be paid
only upon the prior authorization of the chairman. Travel may
be authorized by the chairman for any member and any staff
member in connection with the attendance of hearings conducted
by the Committee or any subcommittee thereof and meetings,
conferences, and investigations which involve activities or
subject matter under the general jurisdiction of the Committee.
Before such authorization is given there shall be submitted to
the chairman in writing the following: (1) the purpose of the
travel; (2) the dates during which the travel is to be made and
the date or dates of the event for which the travel is being
made; (3) the location of the event for which the travel is to
be made; and (4) the names of members and staff seeking
authorization.
(b) Approval of Travel by Minority Members and Staff. In
the case of travel by minority party members and minority party
professional staff for the purpose set out in (a), the prior
approval, not only of the chairman but also of the ranking
minority member, shall be required. Such prior authorization
shall be given by the chairman only upon the representation by
the ranking minority member in writing setting forth those
items enumerated in (1), (2), (3), and (4) of paragraph (a).
Rule 18. Website
The chairman shall maintain an official Committee website
for the purposes of furthering the Committee's legislative and
oversight responsibilities, including communicating information
about the Committee's activities to Committee members and other
members of the House. The ranking minority member may maintain
an official website for the purpose of carrying out official
responsibilities, including communicating information about the
activities of the minority members of the Committee to
Committee members and other members of the House.
Rule 19. Conferences
The chairman of the Committee is directed to offer a motion
under clause 1 of rule XXII of the Rules of the House whenever
the chairman considers it appropriate.
Membership and Organization
ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
(Ratio 30-24)
FRED UPTON, Michigan, Chairman
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California, RALPH M. HALL, Texas
Ranking Member JOE BARTON, Texas,
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan, Chairman Emeritus
Chairman Emeritus ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania
ANNA G. ESHOO, California GREG WALDEN, Oregon
ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York LEE TERRY, Nebraska
GENE GREEN, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Michigan
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania
LOIS CAPPS, California MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas
MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee,
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois Vice Chairman
JIM MATHESON, Utah PHIL GINGREY, Georgia
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana
JOHN BARROW, Georgia ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio
DORIS O. MATSUI, California CATHY McMORRIS RODGERS, Washington
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
KATHY CASTOR, Florida LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey
JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
JERRY McNERNEY, California BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa PETE OLSON, Texas
PETER WELCH, Vermont DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
BEN RAY LUJAAN, New Mexico CORY GARDNER, Colorado
PAUL TONKO, New York MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky* ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
BILLY LONG, Missouri
RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
*Representative Edward J. Markey (D-MA) resigned from the Committee on
Energy and Commerce on July 15, 2013. Representative John A. Yarmuth
(D-KY) was elected to the Committee on Energy and Commerce on September
18, 2013, pursuant to H.Res. 349.
Subcommittee Memberships and Jurisdiction
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade
(Ratio 14-11)
LEE TERRY, Nebraska, Chairman
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois, LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
JERRY McNERNEY, California GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
PETER WELCH, Vermont BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky PETE OLSON, Texas
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JIM MATHESON, Utah ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
JOHN BARROW, Georgia GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California BILLY LONG, Missouri
(Ex Officio) JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Interstate and foreign commerce, including all trade
matters within the jurisdiction of the full committee; Regulation of
commercial practices (the FTC), including sports-related matters;
Consumer affairs and consumer protection, including privacy matters
generally; Consumer product safety (the CPSC); Product liability; Motor
vehicle safety; and, Regulation of travel, tourism, and time.
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology
(Ratio 16-13)
GREG WALDEN, Oregon, Chairman
ANNA G. ESHOO, California, ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
DORIS O. MATSUI, California LEE TERRY, Nebraska
BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa MIKE ROGERS, Michigan
PETER WELCH, Vermont MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee,
BEN RAY LUJAAN, New Mexico STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois CORY GARDNER, Colorado
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JIM MATHESON, Utah ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina BILLY LONG, Missouri
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
(Ex Officio) JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Interstate and foreign telecommunications including, but
not limited to, all telecommunication and information transmission by
broadcast, radio, wire, microwave, satellite, or other mode.
Subcommittee on Energy and Power
(Ratio 17-14)
ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky, Chairman
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois, STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
JERRY McNERNEY, California RALPH M. HALL, Texas
PAUL TONKO, New York JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania
ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York LEE TERRY, Nebraska
GENE GREEN, Texas MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas
LOIS CAPPS, California ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio
MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
JOHN BARROW, Georgia PETE OLSON, Texas
DORIS O. MATSUI, California DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands CORY GARDNER, Colorado
KATHY CASTOR, Florida MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
(Ex Officio non-voting) H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California JOE BARTON, Texas
(Ex Officio) FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: National energy policy generally; Fossil energy,
renewable energy resources and synthetic fuels, energy conservation,
energy information; Energy regulation and utilization; Utility issues
and regulation of nuclear facilities; Interstate energy compacts;
Nuclear energy; The Clean Air Act and air emissions; and, All laws,
programs, and government activities affecting such matters.
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy
(Ratio 14-11)
JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois, Chairman
PAUL TONKO, New York, PHIL GINGREY, Georgia,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey RALPH M. HALL, Texas
GENE GREEN, Texas ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania
LOIS CAPPS, California TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania
JERRY McNERNEY, California ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
JOHN BARROW, Georgia DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
DORIS O. MATSUI, California GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
(Ex Officio) JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: All matters relating to soil and water contamination; The
regulation of solid, hazardous, and nuclear wastes; The regulation of
industrial plant security; The regulation of drinking water; and, The
regulation of toxic substances and noise.
Subcommittee on Health
(Ratio 17-13)
JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania,
Chairman
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey, MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky
ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
LOIS CAPPS, California MIKE ROGERS, Michigan
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania
JIM MATHESON, Utah MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
GENE GREEN, Texas PHIL GINGREY, Georgia
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina CATHY McMORRIS RODGERS, Washington
JOHN BARROW, Georgia LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
KATHY CASTOR, Florida BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
(Ex Officio) RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Public health and quarantine; hospital construction;
mental health and research; biomedical programs and health protection
in general, including public and private health insurance; food and
drugs; and, drug abuse.
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
(Ratio 14-12)
TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania, Chairman
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado, MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
BEN RAY LUJAAN, New Mexico PHIL GINGREY, Georgia
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
KATHY CASTOR, Florida PETE OLSON, Texas
PETER WELCH, Vermont CORY GARDNER, Colorado
PAUL TONKO, New York H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
GENE GREEN, Texas BILLY LONG, Missouri
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
(Ex Officio non-voting) JOE BARTON, Texas
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio) (Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Responsibility for oversight of agencies, departments,
and programs within the jurisdiction of the full committee, and for
conducting investigations within such jurisdiction.
COMMITTEE STAFF
Majority Committee Staff
Gary Andres, Staff Director
Michael Bloomquist, General
Counsel
Karen Christian, Chief Counsel,
Oversight and Investigations /
General Counsel
Alexa Marrero, Deputy Staff
Director
R. Clayton Alspach, Chief Counsel,
Health
Sean Bonyun, Communications
Director
Thomas Hassenboehler, Chief
Counsel, Energy and Power
Charles Ingebretson, Chief
Counsel, Oversight and
Investigations
David McCarthy, Chief Counsel,
Environment and the Economy
Paul Nagle, Chief Counsel,
Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade
David Redl, Chief Counsel,
Communications and Technology
Nick Abraham, Legislative Clerk
Charlotte Baker, Deputy
Communications Director
Ray Baum, Senior Policy Advisor,
Communications and Technology
David Bell, Staff Assistant
Katherine Leighton Brown, Press
Assistant
Allison Busbee, Policy
Coordinator, Energy and Power
Annie Caputo, Professional Staff
Member
Rebecca Card, Staff Assistant
Noelle Clemente, Press Secretary
Sean Corcoran, Financial and
Administrative Coordinator
Gerald Couri, Senior Environmental
Policy Advisor
Patrick Currier, Counsel
Martin Dannenfelser, Senior Policy
Advisor, Director of Coalitions
Brenda Destro, Professional Staff
Member
Andrew Duberstein, Deputy Press
Secretary
Graham Dufault, Policy
Coordinator, Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade
Paul Edattel, Professional Staff
Member
Melissa Froelich, Counsel
Theresa Gambo, Human Resources and
Office Administrator
Bradley Grantz, Policy
Coordinator, Oversight and
Investigations
Kelsey Guyselman, Counsel
Sydne Harwick, Legislative Clerk
Brittany Havens, Legislative Clerk
Sean Hayes, Deputy Chief Counsel,
Oversight and Investigations
Robert Horne, Professional Staff
Member
Brian ``Kirby'' Howard,
Legislative Clerk
Peter E. Kielty, Deputy General
Counsel
Jason Knox, Counsel
Grace Koh, Counsel
Ben Lieberman, Counsel
Carlyle ``Carly'' McWilliams,
Professional Staff Member
Brandon Mooney, Policy Coordinator
to Chairman Emeritus
Mary Neumayr, Senior Energy
Counsel
Emily Newman, Counsel
Kathryn Novaria, Professional
Staff Member
John Ohly, Professional Staff
Member
Timothy Pataki, Professional Staff
Member
Graham Pittman, Staff Assistant
Mark Ratner, Policy Coordinator
Tina Richards, Counsel
Krista Carpenter Rosenthall,
Counsel to Chairman Emeritus
Tara Rothschild, Professional
Staff Member
Christopher Sarley, Policy
Coordinator, Environment and the
Economy
Charlotte Savercool, Legislative
Clerk
Macey Sevcik, Press Assistant
Alan Slobodin, Chief Investigative
Counsel, Oversight and
Investigations
Samuel Spector, Counsel
Peter Spencer, Professional Staff
Member
Heidi Stirrup, Policy Coordinator,
Health
John Stone, Counsel
Timothy Torres, Deputy Information
Technology Director
Joshua Trent, Professional Staff
Member
Olivia Trusty, Professional Staff
Member
Thomas Wilbur, Digital Media
Advisor
Jessica Wilkerson, Legislative
Clerk
Jean Woodrow, Director of
Information Technology
Detailees
Genaro ``Gene'' Fullano, FCC
Wayne Laufert, GPO
Michelle Rosenberg, GAO
Christopher Wells, GPO
Minority Committee Staff
Philip S. Barnett, Staff Director
Karen Nelson, Deputy Committee
Staff Director for Health
Michelle Ash, General Counsel and
Chief Counsel, Commerce,
Manufacturing, Trade
Roger C. Sherman, Chief Counsel
and Staff Director, Communications
and Technology
Stacia Cardille, Chief Counsel
Karen Lightfoot, Communications
Director and Senior Policy Advisor
Pat Delgado, Senior Policy Advisor
Brian Cohen, Staff Director,
Oversight and Investigations and
Senior Policy Advisor
Jeff Baran, Staff Director, Energy
and Environment
Greg Dotson, Staff Director,
Energy and Environment
Michael Goo, Staff Director,
Energy and Environment
Shawn Chang, Chief Counsel,
Communications and Technology
Ruth Katz, Chief Public Health
Counsel
Alexandra Teitz, Chief Counsel,
Energy and Environment
Jennifer Berenholz, Chief Clerk
Tiffany Benjamin, Senior Counsel
Jacqueline Cohen, Senior Counsel
Purvee Kempf, Senior Counsel
Felipe Mendoza, Senior Counsel
Rachel Sher, Senior Counsel
Alison Cassady, Senior
Professional Staff Member
Amy Hall, Senior Professional
Staff Member
Lisa Pinto, Senior Advisor
Peter Bodner, Counsel
Lisa Goldman, Counsel
Kiren Gopal, Counsel
Bruce Ho, Counsel
Matt Siegler, Counsel
Matt Connolly, Professional Staff
Member
Eddie Garcia, Professional Staff
Member
Caitlin Haberman, Professional
Staff Member
Elizabeth Letter, Professional
Staff Member
Margaret Mccarthy, Professional
Staff Member
Billie Mcgrane, Professional Staff
Member
Anne Morris Reid, Professional
Staff Member
Will Wallace, Professional Staff
Member
Stephen Salsbury, Investigator
Ziky Ababiya, Policy Analyst
Joe Banez, Policy Analyst
Alli Corr, Policy Analyst
Hannah Green, Policy Analyst
Ryan Skukowski, Policy Analyst
Kara Van Stralen, Policy Analyst
Elizabeth Ertel, Deputy Clerk
Edward Walker, Technology Director
Jewel Massenberg, Online
Communications Assistant
Debbie Letter, Staff Assistant
Nick Richter, Staff Assistant
Detailees
Patrick Donovan, FCC
Eric Flamm, FDA
Kristina Friedman, EPA
Edward Garcia, HHS
Kaycee Glavich, GAO
Carol Kando-Pineda, FTC
Ryan Schmit, EPA
Legislative and Oversight Activity
Summary of Committee Activities
Total Bills and Resolutions Referred to Committee................ 1158
Public Laws...................................................... 43
Bills and Resolutions Reported to the House...................... 60
Hearings Held:
Days of Hearings............................................. 189
Full Committee........................................... 4
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade....... 25
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology............ 24
Subcommittee on Energy and Power......................... 35
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.............. 21
Subcommittee on Health................................... 54
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations............. 32
Hours of Sitting.............................................415:47
Full Committee........................................... 13:29
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade....... 48:07
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology............ 46:56
Subcommittee on Energy and Power......................... 87:34
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.............. 44:51
Subcommittee on Health...................................115:29
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations............. 73:01
Legislative Markups:
Days of Markups.............................................. 58
Full Committee........................................... 25
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade....... 4
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology............ 7
Subcommittee on Energy and Power......................... 11
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.............. 2
Subcommittee on Health................................... 9
Hours of Sitting............................................. 47:01
Full Committee........................................... 29:02
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade....... 1:43
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology............ 3:37
Subcommittee on Energy and Power......................... 8:02
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.............. 0:56
Subcommittee on Health................................... 3:41
Business Meetings:
Days of Meetings............................................. 4
Full Committee........................................... 4
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations............. 0
Hours of Sitting............................................. 3:16
Full Committee........................................... 3:16
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations............. 0
Full Committee
(Ratio 30-24)
FRED UPTON, Michigan, Chairman
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California, RALPH M. HALL, Texas
Ranking Member JOE BARTON, Texas,
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan, Chairman Emeritus
Chairman Emeritus ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania
ANNA G. ESHOO, California GREG WALDEN, Oregon
ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York LEE TERRY, Nebraska
GENE GREEN, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Michigan
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania
LOIS CAPPS, California MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas
MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee,
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois Vice Chairman
JIM MATHESON, Utah PHIL GINGREY, Georgia
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana
JOHN BARROW, Georgia ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio
DORIS O. MATSUI, California CATHY McMORRIS RODGERS, Washington
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
KATHY CASTOR, Florida LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey
JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
JERRY McNERNEY, California BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa PETE OLSON, Texas
PETER WELCH, Vermont DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
BEN RAY LUJAAN, New Mexico CORY GARDNER, Colorado
PAUL TONKO, New York MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JOHN YARMUTH, Kentucky ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
BILLY LONG, Missouri
RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
Cyber Threats and Security Solutions
On May 21, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce held
a hearing to examine the steps that the Federal government and
the private sector are taking to bolster the security of the
nation's critical infrastructure and to mitigate exposure to
cyber-attacks. The hearing also focused on the President's
Executive Order to improve critical infrastructure
cybersecurity, including its implementation and the
Administration's development of a voluntary cybersecurity
framework. The Committee received testimony from the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, the Honorable Dave
McCurdy, President and CEO of the American Gas Association and
former Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Mr. John
M. McConnell, Vice Chairman of Booz Allen Hamilton and former
Director of National Intelligence, Ambassador R. James Woolsey,
Chairman of Woolsey Partners LLC and former Director of the
Central Intelligence Agency, Northrop Grumman Information
Systems; McAfee, Inc., American Bankers Association, National
Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and the U.S. Telecom
Association.
PPACA Pulse Check
On August 1, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
held a hearing entitled ``PPACA Pulse Check.'' The purpose of
the hearing was to examine the Administration's plans for
implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
to help Americans to learn how they might be affected by the
law. The Committee received testimony from the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services.
PPACA Implementation Failures: Didn't Know or Didn't Disclose?
On October 24, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
held a hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation Failures: Didn't
Know or Didn't Disclose.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
focus on the implementation of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act's health insurance exchanges. The Committee
received testimony from contractors involved in the creation of
the exchanges, including CGI Federal, QSSI, Equifax Workforce
Solutions, and Serco.
PPACA Implementation Failures: Answers from HHS
On October 30, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
held a hearing on the implementation of Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act's health insurance exchanges. The Committee
received testimony from the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``Cyber Threats and Security Solutions.''
(May 21, 2013) Serial Number 113-45.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Pulse Check.'' (August 1, 2013)
Serial Number 113-78.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation Failures: Didn't
Know or Didn't Disclose?'' (October 24, 2013) Serial Number
113-87.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation Failures: Answers
from HHS.'' (October 30, 2013) Serial Number 113-90.
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade
(Ratio 14-11)
LEE TERRY, Nebraska, Chairman
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois, LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
JERRY McNERNEY, California GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
PETER WELCH, Vermont BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
JOHN YARMUTH, Kentucky PETE OLSON, Texas
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JIM MATHESON, Utah ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
JOHN BARROW, Georgia GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California BILLY LONG, Missouri
(Ex Officio) JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Interstate and foreign commerce, including all trade
matters within the jurisdiction of the full committee; Regulation of
commercial practices (the FTC), including sports-related matters;
Consumer affairs and consumer protection, including privacy matters
generally; Consumer product safety (the CPSC); Product liability; Motor
vehicle safety; and, Regulation of travel, tourism, and time.
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
United States Anti-Doping Agency Reauthorization Act
public law 113-__ (s. 2338)
To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and
for other purposes.
Summary
S. 2338 would reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping
Agency to prevent the use of performance-enhancing drugs in
Olympic sports for fiscal years 2014 through 2020.
Legislative History
S. 2338 was introduced by Senator John D. Rockefeller, IV
(WV) on May 14, 2014. The bill was read twice and referred to
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
On September 17, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation met in open markup session to consider S.
2338 and ordered the bill favorably reported to the Senate,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On December 1, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation reported S. 2338 to the Senate (S. Rept.
113-281), and the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative
Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 608).
On December 11, 2014, S. 2338 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
S. 2338 was received in the House on December 12, 2014, and
passed the House, without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 17, 2014, S.2338 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Collectible Coin Protection Act
public law 113-__ (h.r. 2754)
To amend the Hobby Protection Act to make unlawful the
provision of assistance or support in violation of that Act,
and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2754 amends the Hobby Protection Act to make it
unlawful to sell any imitation numismatic item that is not
plainly and permanently marked ``copy.'' It also makes it
unlawful for any person to provide substantial assistance or
support to any manufacturer, importer, or seller if that person
knows or should know that the manufacturer, importer, or seller
is engaged in a violation of the Act. Lastly, the bill
addresses the problem of counterfeit certificates by making the
remedies for trademark infringement available for violations of
the Hobby Protection Act where the violation also involves
unauthorized use of a registered trademark.
Legislative History
H.R. 2754 was introduced by Representative G.K. Butterfield
(NC-1) on July 19, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. H.R. 2754 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade on July 26, 2013.
On July 30, 2013, H.R. 2754 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On July 31, 2013, H.R. 2754 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation.
On December 15, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation was discharged from further consideration of
H.R. 2754 by unanimous consent, and the Senate passed the bill,
without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 17, 2014, H.R. 2754 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 19,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Prevent All Soring Tactics Act of 2013
H.R. 1518
To amend the Horse Protection Act to designate additional
unlawful acts under the Act, strengthen penalties for
violations of the Act, improve Department of Agriculture
enforcement of the Act, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 1518 amends the Horse Protection Act to direct the
Secretary of Agriculture to prescribe regulatory requirements
for the Department of Agriculture to license, train, assign,
and oversee persons who are to be hired by the management of
horse shows, exhibitions, sales, or auctions and are qualified
to detect and diagnose sore horses or otherwise inspect horses
at such events. H.R. 1518 also increases penalties for
violations and mandates permanent disqualification from any
horse show, exhibition, sale, or auction after three cited
violations.
Legislative History
H.R. 1518 was introduced by Representative Ed Whitfield
(KY-1) on April 11, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. H.R. 1518 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade on April 12, 2013.
On November 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``H.R. 1518, a
bill to amend the Horse Protection Act.''
No further action was taken on H.R. 1518.
Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act of 2013
H.R. 2012
To improve the integrity and safety of interstate
horseracing, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2012 designates the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) as
the independent anti-doping organization with responsibility
for ensuring the integrity and safety of horse races that are
the subject of interstate off-track wagers. H.R. 2012
authorizes USADA to develop, publish, and maintain rules as to
which substances, methods, and treatments may not be
administered to horses, and to set guidelines for permitted
substances, methods, and treatments, including withdrawal times
before racing. The bill also establishes penalties for
violations of these rules, and requires obtaining consent from
the USADA before accepting an interstate off-track wager or
conducting a horse race that is the subject of an interstate
off-track wager.
Legislative History
H.R. 2012 was introduced by Representative Joe Pitts (PA-
16) on May 16, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce. H.R. 2012 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade on May 17, 2013.
On November 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``H.R. 2012, a
bill to improve the integrity and safety of interstate
horseracing, and for other purposes.''
No further action was taken on H.R. 2012.
Global Investment in American Jobs Act of 2013
H.R. 2052
To direct the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with
the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies,
to conduct an interagency review of and report to Congress on
ways to increase the global competitiveness of the United
States in attracting foreign direct investment.
Summary
H.R. 2052 directs the Secretary of Commerce, in
coordination with the Federal Interagency Investment Working
Group and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and
agencies, to conduct an interagency review of the global
competitiveness of the United States in attracting foreign
direct investment. H.R. 2052 also requires the Secretary of
Commerce to report its findings to Congress and submit
recommendations for increasing the global competitiveness of
the United States in attracting foreign direct investment.
Legislative History
On April 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing on a Committee Print
entitled the ``Global Investment in American Jobs Act of
2013.''
H.R. 2052 was introduced by Representative Lee Terry (NE-2)
on May 20, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce. On May 21, 2013, H.R. 2052 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade. H.R. 2052
was substantially similar to the Committee Print forwarded to
the full Committee.
On May 22 and May 23, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade met in open markup session to consider
H.R. 2052 and forwarded the bill to the full Committee, as
amended, by a voice vote.
On July 16 and July 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2052 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by unanimous consent.
No report on H.R. 2052 was filed before the bill was
considered in the House.
On September 9, 2013, H.R. 2052 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a roll call vote of 379 yeas and 32 nays, 1
present (Roll Call No. 448).
On September 10, 2013, H.R. 2052 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
On April 9, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation ordered H.R. 2052 favorably reported to the
Senate, without amendment, by a voice vote. On September 10,
2014, Senator John D. Rockefeller, IV (WV) reported H.R. 2052
to the Senate (S. Rept. 113-252), and the bill was placed on
the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar
No. 557).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2052.
Internet Poker Freedom Act of 2013
H.R. 2666
To establish a program for the licensing of Internet poker
by States and Federally recognized Indian tribes, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2666 requires the Department of Commerce and the
National Indian Gaming Commission to establish a program for
qualified regulatory authorities at the State or tribal level
to issue licenses to permit acceptance of Internet poker bets
or wagers from eligible U.S.-located individuals. The bill also
establishes various standards with which qualified regulatory
authorities must comply.
Legislative History
H.R. 2666 was introduced by Representative Joe Barton (TX-
6) on July 11, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce and in addition to the Committee on Financial
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. H.R. 2666 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade on July 12, 2013.
On December 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``The State of
Online Gaming.''
No further action was taken on H.R. 2666.
Low Volume Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Act of 2014
H.R. 4013
To direct the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration to establish a program allowing low volume motor
vehicle manufacturers to produce a limited number of vehicles
annually within a regulatory system that addresses the unique
safety and financial issues associated with limited production,
and to direct the Environmental Protection Agency to allow low
volume motor vehicle manufacturers to install engines from
vehicles that have been issued certificates of conformity.
Summary
H.R. 4013 directs the Secretary of the Department of
Transportation to exempt from specified standards (1) not more
than 1,000 replica motor vehicles per year that are
manufactured or imported by a low volume manufacturer and (2)
not more than fifty non-replica motor vehicles per year that
are manufactured or imported by a single low volume
manufacturer (and no more than 1,000 non-replica motor vehicles
per year). The bill also allows low volume manufacturers to
assign vehicle identification numbers. To qualify for the
exemption, low volume manufacturers must register with the
Secretary.
The bill directs the Secretary to require low volume
manufacturers to affix a permanent label to (1) an exempt non-
replica motor vehicle that identifies the motor vehicle safety
and labeling standards from which that vehicle is exempt, and
(2) an exempt replica motor vehicle that designates the model
year that vehicle replicates.
Low volume manufacturers would remain subject to Federal
motor vehicle safety defect notification, recall, and remedy
requirements if a particular motor vehicle has a motor vehicle
safety defect or nonconformity regarding any standards other
than the specified standards.
H.R. 4013 also would amend the Clean Air Act to allow low
volume motor vehicle manufacturer to install in an exempted,
specifically produced replica or non-replica motor vehicle, a
motor vehicle engine (including engine emission controls) from
a motor vehicle that has been issued a certificate of
conformity with Environmental Protection Administration
emission control standards if certain requirements are met.
Legislative History
H.R. 4013 was introduced by Representative John Campbell
(CA-45) on February 6, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. H.R. 4013 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade on February 7, 2014.
On July 9 and 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade met in open markup session to consider
H.R. 4013 and forwarded the bill to the full Committee, as
amended, by a roll call vote of 15 yeas and 6 nays.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4013.
Travel Promotion, Enhancement, and Modernization Act of 2014
H.R. 4450
To extend the Travel Promotion Act of 2009, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4450 extends the provisions of the Travel Promotion
Act of 2009, which established the public-private partnership
Corporation for Travel Promotion (Brand USA), through September
30, 2020. The legislation would impose new performance and
procurement requirements on the corporation and establish a
competitive process for procuring good and services. The bill
also would extend the authority of Customs and Border
Protection to collect travel promotion fees from certain
foreign individuals traveling to the United States to fund
Brand USA, through Fiscal Year 2015. H.R. 4450 also would
direct the Secretary of Commerce to establish a procedure for
revising the corporation's policy for private contributions,
and to meet with Brand USA every two years to review procedures
used to determine the value of goods and services received from
private sources.
Legislative History
H.R. 4450 was introduced by Representative Gus M. Bilirakis
(FL-12) on April 10, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker. On April 11, 2014, H.R. 4450 was referred to
the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
On July 9 and 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade met in open markup session to consider
H.R. 4450 and forwarded the bill, as amended, to the full
Committee by a roll call vote of 22 yeas and 0 nays.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4450 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On July 22, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4450 to the House (H. Rept. 113-542, Part I), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 408).
H.R. 4450 was considered in the House under a motion to suspend
the rules, and the bill was passed, as amended, by a roll call
vote of 347 yeas and 57 nays (Roll Call No. 433).
On July 31, 2014, H.R. 4450 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 521).
No further action was taken on H.R. 4450, but text
substantially similar to H.R. 4450 was included in H.R. 83.
Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act of 2014
COMMITTEE PRINT
To provide that certain bad faith communications in
connection with the assertion of a United State patent are
unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and for other purposes.
Summary
The Committee Print entitled ``Targeting Rogue and Opaque
Letters Act of 2014'' addresses the growing problem of so-
called patent ``trolls'' sending false or deceptive written
communications seeking compensation for alleged infringement of
a patent. The Committee Print would prohibit an enumerated list
of false and misleading statements in such communications. In
addition, the Committee Print would require the communications
to provide, to the extent reasonable under the circumstances,
enumerated disclosures in order to help recipients respond
appropriately. The Committee Print also would replace various
State laws with a single Federal regime enforced by the Federal
Trade Commission and subject to civil penalties. Additionally,
State Attorneys General would be authorized to enjoin
violations and seek compensatory damages on behalf of the
recipients who suffered actual damages as a result of a
violation.
Legislative History
On May 22, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing on the Committee Print
entitled ``H.R. __, the `Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act
of 2014.''' The Subcommittee received testimony from the Stop
Patent Abuse Now Coalition, Federal Trade Commission,
Application Developers Alliance, Qualcomm, Office of the
Attorney General of Vermont, and a professor of law from George
Mason University.
On July 9 and 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade met in open markup session to consider
the Committee Print and forwarded the bill, as amended, to the
full Committee by a roll call vote of 13 yeas and 6 nays.
No further action was taken on the Committee Print.
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
Our Nation of Builders: Manufacturing in America
On February 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Our Nation
of Builders: Manufacturing in America.'' This was the first in
a series of hearings examining the domestic manufacturing
sector. The Subcommittee reviewed the state of the
manufacturing sector and policies to aid the sector in its
continuing recovery. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Fram Renewable Fuels, Block Steel Corporation, 3M, Oil City
Iron Works, JELD-WEN, Zephyrhills, Corning Incorporated, and
Raytheon Company.
Our Nation of Builders: The Strength of Steel
On March 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Our Nation
of Builders: The Strength of Steel.'' This was the second in a
series of hearings examining the domestic manufacturing sector.
The Subcommittee examined the employment and economic trends in
the U.S. steel industry and their impact on American
manufacturing. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Representative Tim Murphy (PA-18), Representative Pete
Visclosky (IN-1), Cliffs Natural Resources, Nucor Corporation,
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Allied Tube and Conduit,
EVRAZ North America, Arcelor Mittal USA, U.S. Steel
Corporation, and the BlueGreen Alliance.
Our Nation of Builders: Powering U.S. Automobile Manufacturing Forward
On April 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Our Nation
of Builders: Powering U.S. Automobile Manufacturing Forward.''
This was the third in a series of hearings examining the
domestic manufacturing sector. The Subcommittee examined the
automobile manufacturing industry's impact on the U.S. economy
and global market. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Ford Motor Company, Robert Bosch LLC, Honda of America
Manufacturing Incorporated, Toyota Motor Manufacturing Texas
Incorporated, Magna International, the Automotive Manufacturing
Technical Education Collaborative, American Axle and
Manufacturing, and the Maryland Department of the Environment.
Vacation Nation: How Tourism Benefits Our Economy
On May 7, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Vacation
Nation: How Tourism Benefits our Economy.'' The Subcommittee
examined the economic impact of the travel and tourism industry
on the U.S. economy. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the U.S. Travel Association, Marriott International
Incorporated, Enterprise Holdings, InterContinental Hotels
Group, the National Restaurant Association, Visit Florida,
Chicago's North Shore Convention and Visitors Bureau, Discover
Torrance Visitors Bureau, the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of
Tourism, and a member of the City Council of City of Reno,
Nevada.
Fraud on the Elderly: A Growing Concern for a Growing Population
On May 16, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Fraud on the
Elderly: A Growing Concern for a Growing Population.'' The
Subcommittee examined Federal and State government efforts to
detect fraud perpetrated against seniors, to educate consumers
about fraudulent schemes targeting seniors, and to take
enforcement actions against fraudsters. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Government Accountability Office,
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Trade Commission,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the Attorney General
of the State of Vermont.
Our Nation of Builders: Home Economics
On June 4, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Our Nation
of Builders: Home Economics.'' This was the fourth in a series
of hearings examining the domestic manufacturing sector. The
Subcommittee evaluated economic and employment issues bearing
on the U.S. homebuilding industry. The Subcommittee received
testimony from the National Association of Home Builders,
Kohler Company, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, William Shaw and
Associates, Phillips Manufacturing Company, Midwest Block and
Brick, Tilson Home Corporation, NeighborWorks of Western
Vermont, the National Apartment Association, Bovio Advanced
Comfort and Energy Solutions, and the American Council for an
Energy-Efficient Economy.
U.S. Energy Abundance: Manufacturing Competitiveness and America's
Energy Advantage
On June 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade and the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power held a joint hearing entitled ``U.S. Energy Abundance:
Manufacturing Competitiveness and America's Energy Advantage.''
The Subcommittees examined how energy prices and consumption
affect the U.S. manufacturing sector. The Subcommittees
received testimony from Industrial Energy Consumers of America,
AC&S Incorporated, The Pew Charitable Trusts, Marlin Steel Wire
Products, and Sasol Limited.
A Tangle of Trade Barriers: How India's Industrial Policy is Hurting
U.S. Companies
On June 27, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``A Tangle of
Trade Barriers: How India's Industrial Policy is Hurting U.S.
Companies.'' The Subcommittee investigated India's localization
rules and treatment of intellectual property rights, and
considered the impact on U.S. companies, manufacturers, jobs,
and the economy. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, Pfizer Incorporated, the Solar Energy Industries
Association, the Information Technology Industry Council, and
Doctors Without Borders.
Reporting Data Breaches: Is Federal Legislation Needed to Protect
Consumers?
On July 17, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Reporting
Data Breaches: Is Federal Legislation Needed to Protect
Consumers?'' The Subcommittee explored data breach trends
occurring within the United States and whether Federal
legislation is needed to protect consumers. The Subcommittee
received testimony from representatives of CompTIA, CTIA--The
Wireless Association, Symantec Corporation, and TechAmerica, as
well as from a professor of legal studies and business ethics
at the University of Pennsylvania, and a professor of law at
the University of Connecticut.
The U.S.-E.U. Free Trade Agreement: Tipping Over the Regulatory
Barriers
On July 24, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``The U.S.-
E.U. Free Trade Agreement: Tipping Over the Regulatory
Barriers.'' The Subcommittee examined the status of the
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the American Automotive
Policy Council, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America, American Chemistry Council, the Information Technology
Industry Council, the Center for International Environment Law,
and the Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue.
Keystone's Red Tape Anniversary: Five Years of Bureaucratic Delay and
Economic Benefits Denied
On September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Keystone's
Red Tape Anniversary: Five Years of Bureaucratic Delay and
Economic Benefits Denied.'' The Subcommittee examined the
potential economic impact of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The
Subcommittee received testimony from Representative Steve
Daines (MT-AL), Representative Rush Holt (NJ-12),
Representative Ted Poe (TX-2), Senator John Hoeven (ND), as
well as representatives of Welspun Tubular, U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, the Norfolk (Nebraska) Area Chamber of Commerce, the
Laborers' International Union of North America Local 1140,
Energy Policy Research Foundation, Bold Nebraska, and the
Natural Resources Defense Council.
Our Nation of Builders: Training the Builders of the Future
On November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Our Nation
of Builders: Training the Builders of the Future.'' This was
the fifth in a series of hearings examining the domestic
manufacturing sector. The Subcommittee discussed U.S.
manufacturers' need for workers with science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics (STEM) skills and some approaches
to addressing that need. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Manufacturing Institute, Microsoft Corporation,
Quality Float Works Incorporated, Township High School District
214 of the State of Illinois, and the American Association of
University Women.
The FTC at 100: Where Do We Go From Here?
On December 3, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``The FTC at
100: Where do We Go From Here?'' The Subcommittee examined the
Federal Trade Commission's budget, performance, mission, and
authorities as they relate to modern governance. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the four Commissioners of
the Federal Trade Commission.
The State of Online Gaming
On December 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``The State of
Online Gaming.'' The Subcommittee examined the state of
Internet gaming in the United States following the Justice
Department's recent reinterpretation of the Wire Act. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Poker Players
Alliance, Las Vegas Sands Corporation, American Gaming
Association, and Stop Predatory Gambling, as well as from a
professor of public health and health sciences at the
University of Massachusetts and a professor of law at Chapman
University.
Protecting Consumer Information: Can Data Breaches Be Prevented?
On February 5, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Protecting
Consumer Information: Can Data Breaches Be Prevented?'' The
Subcommittee examined the growing number of data breaches in
the retail industry and discussed methods to improve the
security of payment card and personal consumer information. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Attorney General of
Illinois, Trustwave, Secret Service, Director of the National
Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center at the
Department of Homeland Security, Neiman Marcus Group, Target
Brands Incorporated, Payment Card Industry Security Standards
Council, and the Chairwoman of the Federal Trade Commission.
The FTC at 100: Views from the Academic Experts
On February 28, 2014, The Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``The FTC at
100: Views from the Academic Experts.'' The Subcommittee
discussed the role, performance, and modernization of the
Federal Trade Commission. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the George Washington University School of Business,
University of Michigan School of Law, University of
Pennsylvania Law School, University of Baltimore School of Law,
University of Colorado School of Law, and the International
Center for Law and Economics.
Improving Sports Safety: A Multifaceted Approach
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Improving
Sports Safety: A Multifaceted Approach.'' The Subcommittee
examined the growing concern of concussions in sports and
discussed measures to improve the future of sports safety. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Federal Trade
Commission; National Hockey League; National Football League;
USA Hockey; USA Football; Committee on Sports Related
Concussion in Youth at the Institute of Medicine; Children's
Medical Hospital; University of Alabama-Birmingham Department
of Neurosurgery; University of Nebraska Department of Physics
and Astronomy; a former member of the U.S. Women's National
Soccer Team; University of Nebraska Center for Brain, Biology,
and Behavior; Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard Medical
School; and a student ambassador at the National Council on
Youth Sports Safety.
Trolling for a Solution: Ending Abusive Patent Demand Letters
On April 8, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Trolling for
a Solution: Ending Abusive Patent Demand Letters.'' The
Subcommittee examined the growing abuse of patent demand
letters and explored measures to prevent bad actors from
abusing the process. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the American Bankers Association, Cicso Systems Incorporated,
UNeMed Corporation, Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform, a
professor of law at New York University School of Law, and the
Attorney General of the State of Vermont.
Nanotechnology: Understanding How Small Solutions Drive Big Innovation
On Tuesday July 29, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled
``Nanotechnology: Understanding How Small Solutions Drive Big
Innovation.'' The Subcommittee examined the opportunities and
challenges facing the nanotechnology industry and emerging
commercial applications. The Subcommittee received testimony
from NanoMech Incorporated, a professor from Northwestern
University, University of Nebraska Department of Physics and
Astronomy, and a professor from the Smalley Institute for
Nanoscale Science and Technology at Rice University.
Cross Border Data Flows: Could Foreign Protectionism Hurt U.S. Jobs
On September 17, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Cross Border
Data Flows: Could Foreign Protectionism Hurt U.S. Jobs.'' The
Subcommittee discussed the economic importance of cross border
data flow and privacy policies and their potential impact on
U.S. companies and the jobs they support. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the National Association of
Manufacturers, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, eBay Incorporated, and
a professor from the Georgetown University Law Center on
National Security and the Law.
Takata Airbag Ruptures and Recalls
On December 3, 2014, the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and Trade held a hearing entitled ``Takata
Airbag Ruptures and Recalls.'' The Subcommittee examined the
facts and circumstances of ongoing motor vehicle safety recalls
of defective airbag inflators. The Subcommittee received
testimony from Takata Corporation, Toyota Motor Corporation,
Honda North America, BMW of North America, and the Deputy
Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``Our Nation of Builders: Manufacturing in
America.'' (February 14, 2013) Serial Number 113-5.
Hearing entitled ``Our Nation of Builders: The Strength of
Steel.'' (March 21, 2013) Serial Number 113-23.
Hearing entitled ``Our Nation of Builders: Powering U.S.
Automobile Manufacturing Forward.'' (April 10, 2013) Serial
Number 113-27.
Hearing entitled ``Discussion Draft of H.R. __, the Global
Investment in American Jobs Act of 2013.'' (April 18, 2013)
Serial Number 113-32.
Hearing entitled ``Vacation Nation: How Tourism Benefits
Our Economy.'' (May 7, 2013) Serial Number 113-39.
Hearing entitled ``Fraud on the Elderly: A Growing Concern
for a Growing Population.'' (May 16, 2013) Serial Number 113-
41.
Hearing entitled ``Our Nation of Builders: Home
Economics.'' (June 4, 2013) Serial Number 113-49.
Hearing entitled ``U.S. Energy Abundance: Manufacturing
Competitiveness and America's Energy Advantage.'' (June 20,
2013) Serial Number 113-58.
Hearing entitled ``A Tangle of Trade Barriers: How India's
Industrial Policy Is Hurting U.S. Companies.'' (June 27, 2013)
Serial Number 113-62.
Hearing entitled ``Reporting Data Breaches: Is Federal
Legislation Needed to Protect Consumers?'' (July 18, 2013)
Serial Number 113-71.
Hearing entitled ``The U.S.-E.U. Free Trade Agreement:
Tipping Over the Regulatory Barriers.'' (July 24, 2013) Serial
Number 113-75.
Hearing entitled ``Keystone's Red Tape Anniversary: Five
Years of Bureaucratic Delay and Economic Benefits Denied.''
(September 19, 2013) Serial Number 113-85.
Hearing entitled `` H.R. 1518, the `Prevent All Soring
Tactics Act.''' (November 13, 2013) Serial Number 113-92.
Hearing entitled ``Nation of Builders: Training the
Builders of the Future.'' (November 15, 2013) Serial Number
113-97.
Hearing entitled ``H.R. 2012, Horseracing Integrity and
Safety Act of 2013.'' (November 21, 2013) Serial Number 113-
102.
Hearing entitled ``FTC at 100: Where Do We Go From Here?''
(December 3, 2013) Serial Number 113-104.
Hearing entitled ``The State of Internet Gaming.''
(December 10, 2013) Serial Number 113-107.
Hearing entitled ``Protecting Consumer Information: Can
Data Breaches Be Prevented?'' (February 5, 2014) Serial Number
113-115.
Hearing entitled ``The FTC at 100: Views from the Academic
Experts.'' (February 28, 2014) Serial Number 113-122.
Hearing entitled ``Improving Sports Safety: A Multifaceted
Approach.'' (March 13, 2014) Serial Number 113-128.
Hearing entitled ``Trolling for a Solution: Ending Abusive
Patent Demand Letters.'' (April 18, 2014) Serial Number 113-
138.
Hearing entitled ``H.R. __, the `Targeting Rogue and Opaque
Letters Act of 2014.''' (May 22, 2014) Serial Number 113-149.
Hearing entitled ``Nanotechnology: Understanding How Small
Solutions Drive Big Innovation.'' (July 29, 2014) Serial Number
113-169.
Hearing entitled ``Cross Border Data Flows: Could Foreign
Protectionism Hurt U.S. Jobs.'' (September 17, 2014) Serial
Number 113-176.
Hearing entitled ``Takata Airbag Ruptures and Recalls.''
(December 3, 2014) Serial Number 113-183.
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology
(Ratio 16-13)
GREG WALDEN, Oregon, Chairman
ANNA G. ESHOO, California, ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
DORIS O. MATSUI, California LEE TERRY, Nebraska
BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa MIKE ROGERS, Michigan
PETER WELCH, Vermont MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee,
BEN RAY LUJAAN, New Mexico STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois CORY GARDNER, Colorado
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JIM MATHESON, Utah ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina BILLY LONG, Missouri
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
(Ex Officio) JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Interstate and foreign telecommunications including, but
not limited to, all telecommunication and information transmission by
broadcast, radio, wire, microwave, satellite, or other mode.
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
Enhance Labeling, Accessing, and Branding of Electronic Licenses Act of
2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-197 (S. 2583, H.R. 5161)
To promote the non-exclusive use of electronic labeling for
devices licensed by the Federal Communications Commission.
Summary
H.R. 5161 amends the Communications Act of 1934 to require
the Federal Communications Commission to allow manufacturers of
radiofrequency devices with display the option of using
electronic labeling for the equipment in place of physical
labels.
Legislative History
H.R. 5161 was introduced by Representative Robert E. Latta
(OH-5) on July 22, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On July 24, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing and received testimony on the
Committee Print entitled ``Enhance Labeling, Accessing, and
Branding of Electronic Licenses Act of 2014,'' which was
substantially similar to the Committee Print.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 5161 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On September 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 5161 to the House (H. Rept. 113-575), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 426).
On September 11, 2014, H.R. 5161 was considered in the
House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of 402 yeas and
0 nays (Roll Call No. 496).
On September 15, 2014, H.R. 5161 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 5161.
S. 2583 was introduced by Senator Deb Fischer (NE) on July
10, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation.
On September 17, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation reported S. 2583 to the Senate without a
written report, and the bill was placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 570).
On September 18, 2014, S. 2583 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
S. 2583 was received in the House on September 19, 2014.
On November 13, 2014, S. 2583 passed the House, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
The provisions of S. 2583, as passed by the Senate and
House, were substantially similar to H.R. 5161, as passed the
House on September 11, 2014.
On November 19, 2014, S. 2583 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 26,
2014 (Public Law 113-197).
Stela Reauthorization Act of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-200 (H.R. 5728, H.R. 4572)
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 and Title 17,
United States Code, to extend expiring provisions relating to
the retransmission of signals of television broadcast stations,
and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4572 amends the Communications Act of 1934 to extend
the expiring provisions relating to the retransmission of
signals of television broadcast stations and to reform certain
video distribution laws and regulations. The legislation
extends for five years the exemption for satellite providers
from the requirement to obtain retransmission consent for
distant signals and reauthorizes the compulsory copyright
license for distant signals. The legislation also prohibits
broadcast stations that are not commonly owned from jointly
negotiating retransmission consent agreements in the same local
market; extends the deadline required for unwinding joint sales
agreements that are not granted a waiver from the Federal
Communications Commission's (FCC) local television ownership
rule and related attribution rules; eliminates the prohibition
on changing a broadcaster's signal on multi-channel video
programming distributor systems during quarterly Nielsen
network ratings periods; and repeals the FCC's integration ban
for operator-leased cable set-top boxes. The legislation also
requires a report from the Comptroller General to Congress on
the implications to the Communications Act should Congress
phase out the current statutory copyright licensing
requirements; a report from the satellite carriers to the FCC
on the availability of local signals in local markets; and a
report from the FCC examining consumer access to broadcast
signals outside of the local market and whether there are
technologically feasible alternatives to the use of the Nielsen
Designated Market Areas to define broadcast media markets that
would provide consumers with more programming options.
H.R. 5728 includes many provisions identical to H.R. 4572
and adopts additional provisions based on negotiations between
the House and Senate. H.R. 5728 further requires the FCC to
initiate a rulemaking to review the definition of ``good
faith'' in retransmission consent negotiations; prohibits
broadcasters from preventing significantly viewed signals from
entering their local markets; requires cable operators to
report retransmission consent payments in an existing cable
rates report; streamlines the process that would allow small
cable operators under bona fide competition to obtain
regulatory relief; and allows satellite operators and
broadcasters to modify local markets to better reflect their
communities of service. H.R. 5728 also modifies the set top box
provision from H.R. 4572 to eliminate the set-top box
integration ban after one year and establish a multi-
stakeholder working group to explore next-generation options.
Legislative History
On March 12, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Reauthorization of the
Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act,'' and received
testimony on a Committee Print to amend the Communications Act
of 1934 to extend expiring provisions relating to the
retransmission of signals of television broadcast stations, and
for other purposes. On March 25, 2014, the Subcommittee on
Communications and Technology met in open markup session to
consider the Committee Print and forwarded the bill to the full
Committee, as amended, by a voice vote. The bill included an
amendment by Representative Greg Walden (OR-2) and Rep. Anna G.
Eshoo (CA-18), which was adopted by voice vote.
H.R. 4572 was introduced by Representative Greg Walden (OR-
2), with Representative Fred Upton (MI-6), Representative Henry
A. Waxman (CA-33), and Representative Eshoo as original co-
sponsors, on May 6, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On May 7 and 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4572 and ordered
the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a
voice vote.
On July 11, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4572 to the House (H. Rept. 113-518) and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 389).
On July 22, 2014, H.R. 4572 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 23, 2014, H.R. 4572 was received in the Senate. On
July 29, 2014, H.R. 4572 was read twice and referred to the
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4572.
H.R. 5728 was introduced by Representative Fred Upton (MI-
6) on November 18, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On November 19, 2014, H.R. 5728 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On November 20, 2014, H.R. 5728 was received in the Senate,
read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed,
without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On November 24, 2014, H.R. 5728 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 4,
2014 (Public Law 113-200).
Kelsey Smith Act
H.R. 1575
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require a
provider of a commercial mobile service or an IP-enabled voice
service to provide call location information concerning the
user of such a service to law enforcement agencies in order to
respond to a call for emergency services or in an emergency
situation that involves risk of death or serious physical harm.
Summary
H.R. 1575 authorizes telecommunications carriers to share
call location data with law enforcement when it is necessary to
respond to an emergency call or in an emergency situation where
a person's life may be in danger. The law also provides
liability protection for companies that provide the data to law
enforcement.
Legislative History
H.R. 1575 was introduced by Representative Kevin Yoder (KS-
3) on April 15, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce. On April 19, 2013, the bill was referred to the
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session, to consider H.R. 1575 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1575.
A Bill To Affirm the Policy of the United States Regarding Internet
Governance
H.R. 1580
To affirm the policy of the United States regarding
Internet governance.
Summary
H.R. 1580 declares that it is the policy of the United
States to preserve and advance the successful multistakeholder
model that governs the Internet and makes findings.
Legislative History
On February 5, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a joint hearing with the Committee on Foreign
Affairs entitled ``Fighting for Internet Freedom: Dubai and
Beyond'' and received testimony on a Committee Print ``[t]o
affirm the policy of the United States regarding Internet
governance.''
On April 10 and 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on
Communications and Technology met in open markup session to
consider the Committee Print and forwarded the bill to the full
Committee, without amendment, by a voice vote.
H.R. 1580 was introduced by Representative Greg Walden (OR-
2), with Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) as an original
co-sponsor, on April 16, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On April 16, 2013, H.R. 1580 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
On April 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 1580 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by a
voice vote.
On May 3, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1580 to the House (H. Rept. 113-50), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 21).
On May 14, 2013, H.R. 1580 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 413 yeas and 0 nays
(Roll Call No. 145).
On May 15, 2013, H.R. 1580 was received in the Senate, read
twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1580.
Federal Communications Commission Consolidated Reporting Act of 2013
H.R. 2844
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to consolidate the
reporting obligations of the Federal Communications Commission
in order to improve congressional oversight and reduce
reporting burdens.
Summary
H.R. 2844 consolidates eight separate reports of the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) into a single
comprehensive report focused on intermodal competition,
deploying communications capabilities to unserved communities,
and eliminating regulatory barriers. By consolidating these
reports, H.R. 2844 reduces the reporting burdens on the FCC and
encourages the agency to analyze competition in the marketplace
as a whole. The bill also eliminates several outdated reports,
including references to reports repealed more than a decade ago
and a report on competition between telegraph companies and
telephone companies.
Legislative History
On July 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Improving FCC Process''
and received testimony on a Committee Print entitled ``Federal
Communications Commission Consolidated Reporting Act of 2013.''
On July 25, 2013 the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology met in open markup session to consider the Committee
Print and forwarded the bill to the full Committee, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
H.R. 2844 was introduced by Representative Steve Scalise
(LA-1) on July 26, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On July 26, 2013, H.R. 2844 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology. H.R. 2844
was substantially similar to the Committee Print forwarded to
the full Committee.
On July 30 and 31, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2844 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On September 9, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2844 to the House (H. Rept. 113-189), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 136).
On September 9, 2013, H.R. 2844 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a roll call vote of 415 yeas and 0 nays (Roll
Call No. 449).
On September 10, 2013, H.R. 2844 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 2844.
Anti-Spoofing Act of 2014
H.R. 3670
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to expand and
clarify the prohibition on provision of inaccurate caller
identification information, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3670 would amend the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009,
which prohibits entities from transmitting misleading or
inaccurate caller ID information. H.R. 3670 would extend that
prohibition to encompass text messaging and certain VoIP
services.
Legislative History
H.R. 3670 was introduced by Representative Grace Meng (NY-
6), with Representative Joe Barton (TX-6) and Representative
Leonard Lance (NJ-7) as original co-sponsors, on December 5,
2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. On
December 6, 2013, the bill was referred to the Subcommittee on
Communications and Technology.
On July 24, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing and received testimony on H.R. 3670,
the Anti-Spoofing Act of 2013.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3670 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On September 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3670 to the House (H. Rept. 113-572), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 423).
On September 9, 2014, H.R. 3670 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 10, 2014, H.R. 3670 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3670.
The Federal Spectrum Incentive Act
H.R. 3674
To amend the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration Organization Act to provide incentives for the
reallocation of Federal Government spectrum for commercial use,
and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3674 amends the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act to
provide Federal users an additional option for relinquishing
spectrum for commercial auction. The legislation would
authorize Federal users to relocate or terminate their
operations and auction the relinquished spectrum and, in
exchange, receive a percentage of the net auction proceeds.
Funds from the proceeds would be placed into a fund at the
Office of Management and Budget to be used for relocation costs
or to offset budget sequestration.
Legislative History
On December 9, 2013, H.R. 3674 was introduced by
Representative Brett Guthrie (KY-2), with Representative Doris
O. Matsui (CA-6), Representative Greg Walden (OR-2),
Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18), and Representative Henry
A. Waxman (CA-33) as original co-sponsors, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker.
On December 10 and 11, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3674 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On December 12, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3674 to the House (H. Rept. 113-670, Part I), and
the Committee on Armed Service was discharged from further
consideration of the bill. H.R. 3674 was placed on the Union
Calendar (Calendar No. 502). No further action was taken on
H.R. 3674.
The Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act
H.R. 3675
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for
greater transparency and efficiency in the procedures followed
by the Federal Communications Commission, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3675 requires the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC or Commission) to conduct a notice and comment rulemaking
and adopt rules to set minimum comment and reply comment
periods for rulemaking proceedings; to establish policies
concerning extensive comments submitted toward the end of a
comment period; to establish policies to ensure that the public
has time to review material submitted in a proceeding after the
comment cycle has closed; to publish the status of open
rulemakings and list the draft items the Commission currently
is considering; to establish deadlines for action on certain
filings to the Commission and its bureaus; to establish
guidelines for the disposition of petitions for declaratory
ruling; to establish procedures for including the specific text
of proposed rules in Commission Notice of Proposed Rulemakings;
and to require the development of performance measures for FCC
program activities, defined as each FCC program listed in the
Federal budget, as well as each program through which the FCC
collects or distributes $100 million or more.
H.R. 3675 also requires the Commission to seek public
comment on a notice of inquiry into whether and how the
Commission should allow a bipartisan majority of Commissioners
to add an item to the Commission's agenda; inform Commissioners
of all options available on a given Commission item; ensure
that Commissioners have adequate time to review the text of
Commission items; publish the text of items for Commission
consideration prior to Commission vote; establish deadlines for
the processing of applications for licenses; generate
additional resources for the processing of applications; and
publish Commission decisions within thirty days of adoption.
The legislation also contains statutory requirements for
the Commission, including a requirement to review the new
procedural rules every five years; to publish documents in the
Federal Register within forty-five days of adoption; to publish
FOIA compliance, budget data, and personnel data on its
website; and to report annually on whether the Commission has
met the newly required deadlines and guidelines.
Finally, the legislation adds a new procedure for non-
public meetings of the Commission, subject to disclosure
requirements and a permanent exemption from the Antideficiency
Act for the Federal Universal Service Fund.
Legislative History
On July 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Improving FCC Process''
and received testimony on a Committee Print entitled ``Federal
Communications Commission Process Reform Act.''
On July 25, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communication and
Technology met in open markup session to consider the Committee
Print and forwarded the bill to the full Committee, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
H.R. 3675 was introduced by Representative Greg Walden (OR-
2) on December 9, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce.
On December 10 and 11, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3675 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On January 31, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3675 to the House (H. Rept. 113-338) and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 251).
On March 11, 2014, H.R. 3675 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On March 12, 2014, H.R. 3675 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3675.
Domain Openness Through Continued Oversight Matters Act of 2014
H.R. 4342
To prohibit the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration from relinquishing responsibility over the
Internet domain name system until the Comptroller General of
the United States submits to Congress a report on the role of
the NTIA with respect to such system.
Summary
On March 14, 2014, National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA) announced its intention to
transition its oversight of the Internet domain name system's
root zone functions, performed by the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority, to the global multi-stakeholder community. H.R. 4342
requires the Comptroller General to submit to Congress, within
one year of such a proposal, a report on the role of NTIA with
respect to the Internet domain name system. During that one-
year period, NTIA may not relinquish or agree to any proposal
relating to the relinquishment of the responsibility of NTIA
over Internet domain name system functions.
Legislative History
H.R. 4342 was introduced by Representative John Shimkus
(IL-15) on March 27, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On March 28, 2014, H.R. 4342 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
On April 2, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Ensuring the Security,
Stability, Resilience, and Freedom of the Global Internet'' and
receivedtestimony on H.R. 4342, the ``Domain Openness Through
Continued Oversight Matters Act of 2014.''
On April 9 and 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4342
and forwarded the bill to the full Committee, without
amendment, by a roll call vote of 16 yeas and 10 nays.
On May 7 and 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4342 and ordered
the bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by
a voice vote.
H.R. 4342 was incorporated into H.R. 4435, the ``National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015'' as an
amendment offered by Representative Shimkus (H.Amdt. 674) on
May 22, 2014. The amendment was agreed to by a roll call vote
of 245 yeas and 177 nays (Roll Call No. 232). On May 22, 2014,
H.R. 4342 was passed in the House, as amended, by a roll call
vote of 325 yeas and 98 nays (Roll Call No. 240).
On June 5, 2014, H.R. 4342 was received in the Senate, read
twice, and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 425).
No further action was taken on H.R. 4342.
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
Fighting for Internet Freedom: Dubai and Beyond
On February 5, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a joint hearing with the Committee on Foreign
Affairs entitled ``Fighting for Internet Freedom: Dubai and
Beyond.'' The hearing examined the World Conference on
International Telecommunications in Dubai and efforts to bring
the Internet within the regulatory purview of the International
Telecommunications Union. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Federal Communications Commission, Department of
State, Internet Society, and Public Knowledge.
Satellite Video 101
On February 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Satellite Video 101.''
The hearing focused on the state of the Communications Act and
the Copyright Act regarding how satellite companies offer
broadcast television programming. The Subcommittee received
testimony from the Federal Communications Commission, DISH
Network LLC, National Association of Broadcasters, Association
of Public Television Stations, and the Motion Picture
Association of America.
Is the Broadband Stimulus Working?
On February 27, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Is the Broadband
Stimulus Working?'' The hearing focused on the $7 billion
allocated for broadband grants and loans through the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Department of Commerce, Department
of Agriculture, Colorado Telecommunications Association,
FairPoint Communications, North Georgia Network, and MCNC.
Oversight of Firstnet and Emergency Communications
On March 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Oversight of FirstNet and
Emergency Communications.'' The hearing examined how public
safety officials and the public communicate in times of
emergency. The first panel focused on FirstNet, an independent
entity within the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration charged with creating build a nationwide,
interoperable broadband public safety network. The second panel
focused on the tools for communicating with the public, such as
the 9-1-1 service and the broadcast and wireless emergency
alert systems. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
First Responder Network Authority, the Commonwealth of
Virginia, the State of Maryland, Venable LLP Telecommunications
Group, Rivada Networks, Federal Communications Commission, LIN
Media, CTIA--The Wireless Association, and the National
Emergency Number Association.
Health Information Technologies: Harnessing Wireless Innovation
On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Health Information
Technologies: Harnessing Wireless Innovation.'' The hearing
examined the growing market for health-related applications and
whether or not these applications should qualify as medical
devices or be subject to the medical device tax. The
Subcommittee received testimony from Happtique, the Phoenix
Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies,
Qualcomm, Mobile Future, mHealth Regulatory Coalition, and HLM
Venture Partners.
The Lifeline Fund: Money Well Spent?
On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``The Lifeline Fund: Money
Well Spent?'' The hearing focused on the Universal Service
Fund's Lifeline program and considered the growth, waste, and
abuse that have occurred in the program and the recent Federal
Communications Commission reforms. The Subcommittee received
testimony from the Montana Telecommunications Association,
National Hispanic Media Coalition, Billy Jack Gregg Universal
Consulting, CTIA--The Wireless Association, National
Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, and the
Federal Communications Commission.
Cybersecurity: An Examination of the Communications Supply Chain
On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Cybersecurity: An
Examination of the Communications Supply Chain.'' The hearing
looked at challenges in securing the communications supply
chain, what steps industry is taking, and what role standards
organizations, public-private partnerships, and the government
might play. The Subcommittee received testimony from Interos
Solutions, Inc.; Juniper Networks, Inc.; Government
Accountability Office; Electronic Warfare Associates; Ciena;
Stewart A. Baker, former Assistant Secretary for Department of
Homeland Security; and Information Technology Industry Council.
The Satellite Television Law: Repeal, Reauthorize, or Revise?
On June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``The Satellite Television
Law: Repeal, Reauthorize, or Revise?'' The hearing focused on
the satellite television law and improving viewers' access to
content. The Subcommittee received testimony from Schurz
Communications, Inc., TechFreedom, DIRECTV, Disney Media
Networks, Navigant Economics, and Bend Broadband.
Equipping Carriers and Agencies in the Wireless Era
On June 27, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Equipping Carriers and
Agencies in the Wireless Era.'' The hearing focused on Federal
agencies' spectrum usage, how to maintain and improve agencies'
capabilities, and how to free additional spectrum for
commercial use. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Qualcomm, CTIA--The Wireless Association, National
Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the
Department of Defense.
Oversight of Incentive Auction Implementation
On July 23, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Oversight of Incentive
Auction Implementation.'' The hearing focused on the Federal
Communications Commission's implementation of the broadcast
incentive auction legislation enacted into law under the
``Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Federal Communications
Commission, Public Knowledge, T-Mobile, National Association of
Broadcasters, AT&T, and Expanding Opportunities for
Broadcasters Coalition.
Innovation Versus Regulation in the Video Marketplace
On September 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Innovation Versus
Regulation in the Video Marketplace.'' This hearing continued
the Subcommittee's review of the Satellite Television Extension
and Localism Act and examined the disparities in the laws
governing video content, specifically those affecting the
acquisition and distribution of content to consumers. The
Subcommittee received testimony from DISH Network, Meredith
Corp., Suddenlink Communications, Century Link, Inc., Copyright
Alliance, and Public Knowledge.
The Evolution of Wired Communications Networks
On October 23, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``The Evolution of Wired
Communications Networks.'' The hearing focused on how the
technological evolution of networks is impacting consumers and
companies, and whether the laws enacted to govern these
services are appropriate in an Internet Protocol-enabled world.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the Public Service
Board of Vermont, AT&T, Public Knowledge, TelNet Worldwide, and
the Free State Foundation.
Challenges and Opportunities in the 5 GHz Spectrum Band
On November 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Challenges and
Opportunities in the 5 GHz Spectrum Band.'' The hearing focused
on the potential for increased unlicensed use of spectrum in
the 5 GHz band by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
and the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration as a result of the Middle Class Tax Relief and
Job Creation Act of 2012. The Subcommittee received testimony
from Cisco, FCC, Toyota Info Technology Center, and Comcast.
Oversight of FirstNet and the Advancement of Public Safety Wireless
Communications
On November 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Oversight of FirstNet
and the Advancement of Public Safety Wireless Communications.''
This hearing examined the progress of FirstNet, an independent
entity within the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration charged with creating a nationwide,
interoperable broadband public safety network and applications
to advance public safety communications. The Subcommittee
received testimony from First Responder Network Authority,
Federal Communications Commission, Ohio Department of
Administrative Services, Harris Corporation, New Mexico
Department of Information Technology, and National Institute of
Standards and Technology.
Oversight of the Federal Communications Commission
On December 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Oversight of the
Federal Communications Commission.'' This hearing focused on
the major issues before the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), including commercial spectrum auctions, government
spectrum, universal service, FCC reform, and IP transition. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Chairman and
Commissioners of the FCC.
#CommActUpdate: Perspectives from Former FCC Chairmen
On January 15, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``#CommActUpdate:
Perspectives from Former FCC Chairmen.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from former chairmen of the Federal
Communications Commission, including the Honorable Richard
Wiley, the Honorable Reed Hundt, the Honorable Michael Powell,
and the Honorable Michael Copps. The former chairmen provided
insight into the workings of the agency and the challenges of
implementing the Communications Act of 1934.
Ensuring the Security, Stability, Resilience and Freedom of the Global
Internet
On April 2, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Ensuring the Security,
Stability, Resilience, and Freedom of the Global Internet.''
This hearing focused on the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA) announcement of the
transition of Internet Assigned Numbers Authority functions to
the global multi-stakeholder community. The Subcommittee
received testimony from NTIA, Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers, the Internet Governance Coalition,
NetChoice, and New America Foundation Open Technology
Institute.
Oversight of the Federal Communications Commission
On May 20, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Oversight of the Federal
Communications Commission.'' This hearing served as a
discussion for a variety of issues, including net neutrality,
commercial spectrum auctions, mobile spectrum holding rules,
media ownership, and process reform. The Subcommittee received
testimony from the Honorable Tom Wheeler, Chairman, Federal
Communications Commission.
Media Ownership in the 21st Century
On June 11, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology held a hearing entitled ``Media Ownership in the
21st Century.'' The hearing examined the Federal Communications
Commission's media ownership rules and whether they have kept
pace with the significant changes in today's media marketplace.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the RBC Capital
Markets, the Newspaper Association of America, the National
Hispanic Media Coalition, the Federal Communications
Commission, the Newspaper Guild-CWA, and the National
Association of Broadcasters.
21st Century Technology for 21st Century Cures
On July 17, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications and
Technology and the Subcommittee on Health held a joint hearing
entitled ``21st Century Technology for 21st Century Cures.''
The hearing focused on communications technologies that are
transforming sectors of the economy and being developed for the
health sector, and explored how companies are harnessing the
innovations in communications technology to improve patient
outcomes and spur advances in health care. The Subcommittees
received testimony from Qualcomm Incorporated, Amazon, McKesson
Corporation, Health Fidelity, and LyfeChannel.
Oversight of FCC Budget and Management
On September 17, 2014, the Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a hearing entitled ``Oversight of FCC
Budget and Management.'' The hearing focused on several issues
within the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), such as the
agency's operations, management of backlog and current
workload, staffing, and budget and operating expenses. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Managing Director and
the Inspector General of the FCC.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``Fighting for Internet Freedom: Dubai and
Beyond.'' (February 5, 2013) Serial Number 113-2.
Hearing entitled ``Satellite Video 101.'' (February 13,
2013) Serial Number 113-4.
Hearing entitled ``Is the Broadband Stimulus Working?''
(February 27, 2013) Serial Number 113-9.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of FirstNet and Emergency
Communications.'' (March 14, 2013) Serial Number 113-16.
Hearing entitled ``Health Information Technologies:
Harnessing Wireless Innovation.'' (March 19, 2013) Serial
Number 113-20.
Hearing entitled ``The Lifeline Fund: Money Well Spent?''
(April 25, 2013) Serial Number 113-36.
Hearing entitled ``Cybersecurity: An Examination of the
Communications Supply Chain.'' (May 21, 2013) Serial Number
113-46.
Hearing entitled ``The Satellite Television Law: Repeal,
Reauthorize, or Revise?'' (June 12, 2013) Serial Number 113-52.
Hearing entitled ``Equipping Carriers and Agencies in the
Wireless Era.'' (June 27, 2013) Serial Number 113-63.
Hearing entitled ``Improving FCC Process.'' (July 11, 2013)
Serial Number 113-69.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of Incentive Auction
Implementation.'' (July 23, 2013) Serial Number 113-74.
Hearing entitled ``Innovation Versus Regulation in the
Video Marketplace.'' (September 11, 2013) Serial Number 113-81.
Hearing entitled ``The Evolution of Wired Communications
Networks.'' (October 23, 2013) Serial Number 113-86.
Hearing entitled ``Challenges and Opportunities in the 5
GHz Spectrum Band.'' (November 13, 2013) Serial Number 113-93.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of FirstNet and the
Advancement of Public Safety Wireless Communications.''
(November 21, 2013) Serial Number 113-103.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of the Federal Communications
Commission.'' (December 12, 2013) Serial Number 113-109.
Hearing entitled ``#CommActUpdate: Perspectives from Former
FCC Chairmen.'' (January 15, 2014) Serial Number 113-112.
Hearing entitled ``Reauthorization of the Satellite
Television Extension and Localism Act.'' (March 12, 2014)
Serial Number 113-126.
Hearing entitled ``Ensuring the Security Stability,
Resilience, and Freedom of the Global Internet.'' (April 2,
2014) Serial Number 113-134.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of the Federal Communications
Commission.'' (May 20, 2014) Serial Number 113-146.
Hearing entitled ``Media Ownership in the 21st Century.''
(June 11, 2014) Serial Number 113-152.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Technology for 21st Century
Cures.'' (July 17, 2014) Serial Number 113-162.
Hearing entitled ``A legislative hearing on H.R. 3670, the
Anti-Spoofing Act of 2013, H.R. __ the LPTV and Translator Act
of 2014, and H.R. __, the E-LABEL Act.'' (July 24, 2014) Serial
Number 113-166.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of FCC Budget and
Management.'' (September 17, 2014) Serial Number 113-175.
Subcommittee on Energy and Power
(Ratio 17-14)
ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky, Chairman
BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois, STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
JERRY McNERNEY, California RALPH M. HALL, Texas
PAUL TONKO, New York JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
JOHN YARMUTH, Kentucky JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania
ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York LEE TERRY, Nebraska
GENE GREEN, Texas MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas
LOIS CAPPS, California ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio
MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
JOHN BARROW, Georgia PETE OLSON, Texas
DORIS O. MATSUI, California DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands CORY GARDNER, Colorado
KATHY CASTOR, Florida MIKE POMPEO, Kansas
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois
(Ex Officio non-voting) H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California JOE BARTON, Texas
(Ex Officio) FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: National energy policy generally; Fossil energy,
renewable energy resources and synthetic fuels, energy conservation,
energy information; Energy regulation and utilization; Utility issues
and regulation of nuclear facilities; Interstate energy compacts;
Nuclear energy; The Clean Air Act and air emissions; and, All laws,
programs, and government activities affecting such matters.
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-23 (H.R. 267)
To improve hydropower, and for other purposes.
Summary
The legislation facilitates the development of new
hydropower resources in the United States by streamlining the
Federal licensing requirements for small hydropower projects
and qualifying conduit hydropower facilities. The legislation
also requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to study
ways to improve Federal hydropower licensing for non-powered
dams and closed-loop pumped storage facilities.
Legislative History
H.R. 267 was introduced by Representative Cathy McMorris
Rodgers (WA-5) on January 15, 2013, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce. On January 18, 2013, H.R. 267
was referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On January 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 267 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by
unanimous consent.
On February 4, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 267 to the House (H. Rept. 113-6), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 4).
On February 12, 2013, H.R. 267 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and on February 13, 2013,
the bill was passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of
422 yeas and 0 nays (Roll Call No. 40).
On February 14, 2013, H.R. 267 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
On April 23, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources held a hearing on H.R. 267.
On May 8, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources ordered H.R. 267 favorably reported to the Senate,
without amendment, by a voice vote
On May 13, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources reported H.R. 267 to the Senate, without amendment,
and the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar
under General Orders (Calendar No. 71).
On June 4, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources filed a written report (Report No. 113-38).
On August 1, 2013, H.R. 267 passed, without amendment, the
Senate by unanimous consent.
On August 6, 2013, H.R. 267 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on August 9, 2013 (Public Law
113-23).
To Amend Title 49, United States Code, To Modify Requirements Relating
to the Availability of Pipeline Safety Regulatory Documents, and for
Other Purposes.
PUBLIC LAW 113-30 (H.R. 2576)
To amend Title 49, United States Code, to modify
requirements relating to the availability of pipeline safety
regulatory documents, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2576 revises certain pipeline safety standards
requirements to postpone from January 3, 2012 to January 3,
2015, the requirement that the Secretary of Transportation
issue a regulation that incorporates by reference any pipeline
safety regulatory documents or portions only if such documents
are made available to the public, free of charge, on an
Internet website. H.R. 2576 eliminates (1) the prohibition
against issuing guidance unless such requirements are met and
(2) the restriction that such documents be made available to
the public only on the Internet.
Legislative History
H.R. 2576 was introduced by Representative Jeff Denham (CA-
10) on June 28, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On July 16, 2013, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure reported H.R. 2576 to the House (H. Rept. 113-
152, Part I), and the Committee on Energy and Commerce was
discharged from further consideration of the bill. H.R. 2576
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 110).
On July 16, 2013, H.R. 2576 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 405 yeas and 2 nays
(Roll Call No. 354).
On July 17, 2013, H.R. 2576 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation.
On August 1, 2013, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation was discharged from further consideration of
H.R. 2576 by unanimous consent, and the Senate passed the bill,
without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On August 6, 2013, H.R. 2576 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on August 9, 2013
(Public Law 113-30).
To Amend the Clean Air Act To Remove the Requirement for Dealer
Certification of New Light-Duty Motor Vehicles
PUBLIC LAW 113-109 (H.R. 724)
To amend the Clean Air Act to remove the requirement for
dealer certification of new light-duty motor vehicles.
Summary
H.R. 724 amends the Clean Air Act to remove the requirement
that a dealer of new light-duty motor vehicles furnish a
certification to the purchaser that the vehicle conforms to
applicable regulations concerning emission standards, including
notice of warranty rights should the vehicle fail to conform to
such regulations.
Legislative History
H.R. 724 was introduced by Representative Robert E. Latta
(OH-5) on February 14, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On February 15, 2013, H.R. 724 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On December 10 and 11, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 724 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On January 7, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 724 to the House (H. Rept. 113-320), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 238).
On January 8, 2014, H.R. 724 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 405 yeas and 0 nays
(Roll Call No. 2).
On January 9, 2014, H.R. 724 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works.
On February 6, 2014, the Committee on Environment and
Public Works met in open markup session to consider H.R. 724
and ordered the bill favorably reported to the Senate, without
amendment.
On April 1, 2014, the Committee on Environment and Public
Works reported H.R. 724 to the Senate (S. Rept. 113-144), and
the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 342).
On May 22, 2014, H.R. 724 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On May 30, 2014, H.R. 724 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on June 9, 2014 (Public Law
113-109).
Collinsville Renewable Energy Production Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-122 (H.R. 316)
To reinstate and transfer certain hydroelectric licenses
and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of
certain hydroelectric projects.
Summary
H.R. 316 authorizes the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission to reinstate the license for projects numbered 10822
and 10823, and to extend for two years the time period during
which the licensee must commence project construction.
Legislative History
H.R. 316 was introduced by Representative Elizabeth Esty
(CT-5) on January 18, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On January 18, 2013, H.R. 316 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On January 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 316 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by
unanimous consent.
On February 4, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 316 to the House (H. Rept. 113-7), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 5).
On February 12, 2013, H.R. 316 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On February 13, 2013, H.R. 316 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
On April 16, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources' Subcommittee on Water and Power held a hearing on
H.R. 316 and Senate Amendment 579, an amendment introduced by
Senator Christopher Murphy (CT) and Senator Richard Blumenthal
(CT) on March 22, 2013.
On May 16, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources met in open markup session to consider H.R. 316 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the Senate, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On May 22, 2014, H.R. 316 passed the Senate, as amended, by
unanimous consent.
On June 23, 2014, H.R. 316 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a roll call vote of 379 yeas and 3 nays (Roll
Call No. 340).
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 316 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on June 30, 2014 (Public Law
113-122).
Reliable Home Heating Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-125 (S. 2086)
A bill to address current emergency shortages of propane
and other home heating fuels and to provide greater flexibility
and information for Governors to address such emergencies in
the future.
Summary
S. 2086 gives the Governor of a State the authority to
extend a state of emergency order for two additional 30-day
periods, for a total of 90 days, without the need for a Federal
disaster declaration or Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration action. Additionally, the legislation would
require the Energy Information Administration to provide status
reports to Governors should the inventory of residential
heating fuel in a given district fall below the five-year
average for more than three consecutive weeks. Finally, the
legislation would require the Department of Transportation to
complete a report on the safety impacts of the extensions
issued by Governors.
Legislative History
S. 2086 was introduced by Senator John Thune on March 6,
2014, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation.
On April 9, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation met in open markup session to consider S. 2086
and ordered the bill favorably reported to the Senate, as
amended, by a voice vote.
On May 20, 2014, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation reported S. 2086 to the Senate (Rept. 113-162),
and the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar
under General Orders (Calendar No. 379).
On May 22, 2014, S. 2086 was received in the House and
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On June 23, 2014, S. 2086 was considered in the House under
a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On June 25, 2014, S. 2086 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on June 30, 2014 (Public Law
113-125).
Supporting Knowledge and Investing in Lifelong Skills Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-128 (H.R. 803)
An act to amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to
strengthen the United States workforce development system
through innovation in, and alignment and improvement of,
employment, training, and education programs in the United
States, and to promote individual and national economic growth,
and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 803, the Supporting Knowledge and Investing in
Lifelong Skills (SKILLS) Act, amends the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998 to streamline Federal workforce development
programs; strengthen the employer-driven workforce development
system; expand decision-making at the local level; improve
accountability and transparency; simplify reporting
requirements; encourage more training to meet in-demand job
opportunities; and improve adult education and vocational
rehabilitation.
Legislative History
H.R. 803 was introduced by Representative Virginia Foxx on
February 25, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Education
and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee on
Veterans' Affairs, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On February 25, 2013, H.R. 803 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy, the Subcommittee
on Economic Opportunity, and the Subcommittee on Water
Resources and Environment.
On March 6, 2013, the Committee on Education and the
Workforce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 803 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 23 yeas and 18 not voting.
On March 12, 2013, the Committee on Education and the
Workforce reported H.R. 803 to the House (H. Rept. 113-14, Part
1), and the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No.
9).
On March 15, 2013, H.R. 803 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 113, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 215 yeas and 202
nays (Roll Call No. 75).
On March 18, 2014, H.R. 803 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 803 passed the Senate, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 95 yeas and 3 nays (Record Vote No.
214).
On July 9, 2014, a motion to suspend the Rules and agree to
the Senate amendments to H.R. 803 was agreed to by a roll call
vote of 415 yeas and 6 nays (Roll Call No. 378).
On July 15, 2014, H.R. 803 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on July 22, 2014 (Public Law
113-128).
A Bill To Reinstate and Extend the Deadline for Commencement of
Construction of a Hydroelectric Project Involving the American Falls
Reservoir
PUBLIC LAW 113-177 (S. 276)
A bill to reinstate and extend the deadline for
commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project
involving the American Falls Reservoir.
Summary
S. 279 directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
upon the request of the licensee for the project numbered 12423
(American Falls Reservoir, Idaho), to reinstate the license and
extend for three years after enactment of this Act the time
period during which the licensee is required to commence the
construction of project works.
Legislative History
S. 279 was introduced by Senator James Risch on February
11, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
On March 14, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources met in open markup session to consider S. 276 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the Senate, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On April 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources reported S. 276 to the Senate (Rept. 113-24), and the
bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 55).
On June 19, 2013, S. 276 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On June 20, 2013, S. 276 was received in the House and
referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. On June 21,
2013, the bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power.
On September 10 and 11, 2014, S. 276 was considered in the
House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a voice vote.
On September 16, 2014, S. 276 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on September 26,
2014 (Public Law 113-177).
United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014
public law 113-__ (s. 2673, h.r. 938 (title ii), h.r. 3683)
To strengthen the strategic alliance between the United
States and Israel, and for other purposes.
Summary
Title II of H.R. 938 amends the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 to strengthen the collaboration between
the United States and Israel on energy development and to
bolster the existing United States-Israel energy relationship
by encouraging increased cooperation between the two countries.
The bill encourages inter-governmental collaboration in energy
technology innovation, technology transfer, and analysis of
geopolitical implications of new natural resource development,
while also encouraging private sector business development. The
bill also facilitates continued engagement between the
countries to share best practices in a number of areas,
including: research, development, and deployment of renewable
energy and energy efficiency, energy infrastructure
cybersecurity; environmental management of deep water
exploration; and coastal protection and restoration. The bill
also expands an existing United States-Israel grant program to
include projects focused on natural gas and water efficiency.
Legislative History
H.R. 3683 was introduced by Representative Fred Upton (MI-
6) on December 10, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On December 10 and 11, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3683 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On February 5, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3683 to the House (H. Rept. 113-341, Part I).
No further action was taken on H.R. 3683.
H.R. 938 was introduced by Representative Ileana Ros-
Lehtinen (FL-27) on March 4, 2013, and referred to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee
on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Science, Space, and
Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On January 29, 2013, the Committee on Foreign Affairs met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 938, and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On March 4 and 5, 2014, H.R. 938 was considered in the
House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 410 yeas and 1 nays
(Roll Call No. 95).
Title II of H.R. 938, as amended by the House, incorporates
provisions that are substantially similar to H.R. 3683, as
reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
On March 6, 2014, H.R. 938 was received in the Senate, read
twice, and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
No further action was taken on H.R. 938.
S. 2673 was introduced by Senator Barbara Boxer (CA) on
July 28, 2014, read the first time, and place on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. On July 29,
2014, S. 2673 was read the second time and placed on Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 492).
On September 18, 2014, S. 2673 was laid before the Senate
by unanimous consent and passed the Senate, as amended, by
unanimous consent.
On September 19, 2014, S. 2673 was received in the House
and held at the desk.
On December 3, 2014, S. 2673 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed
by, without amendment, by a voice vote.
S. 2673 was presented to the President on December 10,
2014, and the President signed the bill on December 19, 2014
(Public Law 113-__).
To Require the Secretary of the Interior To Assemble a Team of
Technical, Policy, and Financial Experts To Address the Energy Needs of
the Insular Areas of the United States and the Freely Associated States
Through the Development of Action Plans Aimed at Reducing Reliance on
Imported Fossil Fuels and Increasing Use of Indigenous Clean-Energy
Resources, and for Other Purposes
[Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015]
PUBLIC LAW 113-235 (H.R. 83, H.R. 4296, H.R. 5803)
To require the Secretary of the Interior to assemble a team
of technical, policy, and financial experts to address the
energy needs of the insular areas of the United States and the
Freely Associated States through the development of action
plans aimed at promoting access to affordable, reliable energy,
including increasing use of indigenous clean-energy resources,
and for other purposes.
Summary
The legislation directs the Secretary of the Department of
the Interior to establish a team of technical, policy, and
financial experts to develop an energy action plan for each of
the insular areas and Freely Associated States and to assist in
the implementation of those energy action plans. Section 2 of
the legislation extends the Federal immigration law transition
period for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
through December 31, 2019, including the annual reduction of
nonimmigrant workers who may be admitted during such period.
Legislative History
H.R. 83 was introduced by Representative Donna M.
Christensen (VI-Delegate), on January 3, 2013, and referred to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce (prior to consideration of
the bill on the Floor, the Committee on Energy and Commerce and
the Committee on Natural Resources exchanged letters
acknowledging the Committee on Natural Resources'
jurisdictional interest in the bill). On January 4, 2013, H.R.
83 was referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On July 9 and 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider H.R. 83 and
forwarded the bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a
voice vote.
On July 16 and 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 83 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by unanimous consent.
On June 19, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 83 to the House (H. Rept. 113-483), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 359).
On September 15, 2014, H.R. 83 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 16, 2014, H.R. 83 was received in the Senate
and read twice.
On September 18, 2014, H.R. 83 passed the Senate, with a
Senate amendment, by unanimous consent.
The Senate amendment to H.R. 83 included provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 4296, which was introduced by
Representative Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan on March 25,
2014, and was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources,
and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period
to be subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On March 28, 2014, H.R. 4296 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans, and Insular
Affairs. On April 29, 2014, the Subcommittee on Fisheries,
Wildlife, Oceans, and Insular Affairs held a hearing on the
bill.
On May 29, 2014, the Committee on Natural Resources met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 4296, and ordered the bill
favorably reported to the House, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On June 18, 2014, the Committee on the Judiciary and the
Committee on Natural Resources exchanged letters acknowledging
the Committee on the Judiciary's jurisdictional interest in the
bill.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4296.
On December 11, 2014, H.R. 83 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 776, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 219 yeas and 206
nays (Roll Call No. 563).
The text of the House amendment to H.R. 83 included the
Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015,
which included substantially similar to H.R. 4450.
On December 11, 2014, H.R. 83 was received in the Senate.
On December 12, 2014, H.R. 83 was laid before the Senate by
unanimous consent, and on December 13, 2014, the bill passed
the Senate, as amended by the House, by a roll call vote of 56
yeas and 40 nays (Roll Call No. 352).
On December 16, 2014, H.R. 83 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 16,
2014 (Public Law 113-235).
H.R. 5803 was introduced by Representative Donna M.
Christensen (VI-Delegate), on December 8, 2014, and referred to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H.R. 5803 is identical to
H.R. 83 as amended and passed by the Senate on September 18,
2014.
On December 11, 2014, H.R. 5803 passed the House, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 12, 2014, H.R. 5803 was received in the Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 5803.
EPS Service Parts Act of 2014
public law 113-__ (h.r. 5057)
To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to permit
exemptions for external power supplies from certain efficiency
standards, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 5057 amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to
permit exemptions for certain external power supply service and
spare parts from Department of Energy (DOE) efficiency
standards. The bill authorizes DOE to establish limited
reporting requirements and modifications to prevent the
potential misuse of the exemption.
Legislative History
H.R. 5057 was introduced by Representative Cory Gardner
(CO-4) on July 10, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On July 11, 2014, H.R. 5057 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 5057 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On September 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 5057 to the House (H. Rept. 113-574), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 425).
On September 10 and 11, 2014, H.R. 5057 was considered in
the House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 15, 2014, H.R. 5057 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources.
On December 11, 2014, H.R. 5057 was discharged from the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Senate
passed the bill, without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 13, 2014, H.R. 5057 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Propane Education and Research Enhancement Act of 2014
public law 113-__ (h.r. 5705)
To modify certain provisions relating to the Propane
Education and Research Council.
Summary
H.R. 5705 amends the Propane Education and Research Act of
1996 to direct the Propane Education and Research Council to
develop for propane distributors and consumers training
programs on strategies to mitigate negative effects of future
propane price spikes. The bill also directs the Secretary of
Commerce to use the refiner price to end users of consumer
grade propane as published by the Energy Information
Administration when preparing the annual analysis of changes in
the price of propane relative to other energy sources.
Legislative History
H.R. 5705 was introduced by Representative Robert E. Latta
(OH-5) on November 13, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On November 14, 2014, H.R. 5705 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
December 9, 2014, H.R. 5705 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On December 10, 2014, H.R. 5705 was received in the Senate
and read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed
without amendment by unanimous consent.
On December 12, 2014, H.R. 5705 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
American Energy Solutions for Lower Costs and More American Jobs Act
H.R. 2
DIVISION A--ENERGY AND COMMERCE
To remove Federal Government obstacles to the production of
more domestic energy; to ensure transport of that energy
reliably to businesses, consumers, and other end users; to
lower the cost of energy to consumers; to enable manufacturers
and other businesses to access domestically produced energy
affordably and reliably in order to create and sustain more
secure and well-paying American jobs; and for other purposes.
Summary
Title I, Subtitle A of H.R. 2 removes the requirement of a
Presidential Permit for approving the Keystone XL pipeline,
deems the final environmental impact statement that was issued
in August 2011 by the Department of State sufficient to satisfy
the requirements of the National Energy Policy Act and the
National Historic Preservation Act, and issues all Federal
permits necessary to construct the Keystone XL pipeline,
including permits required by the Endangered Species Act, the
Mineral Leasing Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Rivers
and Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899, and the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act. The legislation also limits judicial challenges to
the project.
Title I, Subtitle B of H.R. 2 amends the Natural Gas Act to
direct the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to
approve or deny a certificate of public convenience and
necessity within twelve months after providing public notice of
the permit application for a natural gas pipeline project. The
bill requires the responsible agency issuing any Federal
license, permit, or approval regarding the siting,
construction, expansion, or operation of a project for which a
certificate is sought, to approve or deny issuance of the
certificate within ninety days after FERC issues its final
environmental document regarding the project. Title I, Subtitle
B further directs FERC to grant an agency request for a thirty-
day extension of the ninety-day time period if the agency
demonstrates necessity due to unforeseen circumstances beyond
its control and states that any license, permit, or approval
shall go into effect if the responsible agency neither approves
nor denies its issuance within that time period.
Title I, Subtitle C requires the Secretary of Commerce,
with respect to oil pipelines, FERC, with respect to natural
gas pipelines, or the Secretary of Energy, with respect to
electric transmission facilities, to approve a request for
approval of construction, connection, operation, or maintenance
unless it is not in U.S. national security interests. Subtitle
C further declares that such an approval shall not be construed
to constitute a major Federal action for purposes of
environmental review under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, makes conforming amendments to the Federal Power
Act, and eliminates the requirement for Department of Energy
(DOE) approval of natural gas exports or imports to or from
Canada or Mexico. Title I, Subtitle C also provides that no
Presidential permit required under specified executive orders
shall be necessary for activities covered by the approval
provisions. In addition, it provides that no approval under
this bill, or under a Presidential permit specified by this
bill, shall be required for modifications to facilities covered
by this bill, including expansions and flow reversals.
Title II, Subtitle A requires the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), before promulgating a
final rule that (1) regulates the production, supply,
distribution, or use of energy and (2) is estimated by the
Administrator or the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget to impose aggregate costs of more than $1 billion, to
submit a report to Congress providing information detailing
certain cost, benefit, energy price, and job impacts. The
Secretary of Energy, in consultation with other relevant
agencies, shall (1) conduct a review of the energy price,
reliability, and other energy-related impacts, and (2) make a
determination about whether the rule will cause significant
adverse effects to the economy. Title II, Subtitle A prohibits
the Administrator from promulgating any such final rule if the
Secretary of Energy determines that such rule will cause
significant adverse effects to the economy.
Title II, Subtitle B provides direction to the EPA
regarding the agency's pending greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants. The bill requires
that for any GHG standards developed by the EPA for new plants,
that the agency (1) establish separate standards for natural
gas and coal-fired power plants; and (2) set standards for
coal-fired power plants that reflect emissions levels that have
been demonstrated to be achievable using commercially available
technologies. Title II, Subtitle B also requires that for any
GHG standards, rules, or guidelines developed by the EPA for
reconstructed, modified, or existing plants, the EPA
Administrator report to Congress on the cost and other impacts,
and the regulation shall not take effect unless Congress enacts
a Federal law specifying the effective date.
Title III of H.R. 2 expedites the decision making process
to authorize natural gas exports under section 3 of the Natural
Gas Act by requiring DOE to issue a decision within ninety days
of the end of the comment period or the date of enactment of
the Act, whichever is later. The legislation also would grant
original and exclusive jurisdiction over certain civil actions
to the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which
the export facility will be located.
Legislative History
H.R. 2 was introduced by Representative Lee Terry (NE-2) on
September 15, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Natural
Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker.
On September 18, 2014, H.R. 2 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 727, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of 226 yeas and
191 nays (Roll Call No. 515).
On November 12, 2014, H.R. 2 was received in the Senate.
On November 13, 2014, H.R. 2 was read the first time and
placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First
Time.
On November 17, 2014, H.R. 2 was read the second time and
placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders
(Calendar No. 601).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2.
Northern Route Approval Act
H.R. 3
To approve the construction, operation, and maintenance of
the Keystone XL pipeline, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3 removes the requirement of a Presidential Permit for
approving the Keystone XL pipeline, deems the final
environmental impact statement that was issued in August 2011
by the Department of State to be sufficient to satisfy the
requirements of the National Energy Policy Act and the National
Historic Preservation Act, and issues all Federal permits
necessary to construct the Keystone XL pipeline, including
permits required by the Endangered Species Act, the Mineral
Leasing Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Rivers and
Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899, and the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act. The legislation also limits judicial challenges to
the project.
Legislative History
H.R. 3 was introduced by Representative Lee Terry (NE-2) on
March 15, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce and the Committee on Natural Resources, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. On March
22, 2013, H.R. 3 was referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power.
On April 10, 2013, the Subcommittee Energy and Power held a
hearing on H.R. 3 and received testimony from TransCanada,
Natural Resources Defense Council, Delta Industrial Valves,
Inc., Laborers International Union of North America, and a
professor and research director at Simon Fraser University.
On April 16, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 3 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, without amendment, by a roll call
vote of 17 yeas and 9 nays.
On April 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 3 and ordered the bill
favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by a roll
call vote of 30 yeas and 18 nays.
On May 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3 to the House (H. Rept. 113-61, Part 1), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 40).
On May 22, 2013, H.R. 3 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 228, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 241 yeas, 175 nays,
1 present (Roll Call No. 179).
On May 23, 2013, H.R. 3 was received in the Senate and read
the first time. On June 3, 2013, H.R. 3 was read the second
time and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 81).
No further action was taken on H.R. 3. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 3 were included in H.R. 2.
Domestic Prosperity and Global Freedom Act
H.R. 6
To provide for expedited approval of exportation of natural
gas to World Trade Organization countries, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 6 expedites the decision making process to authorize
natural gas exports under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act by
requiring the Department of Energy to issue a decision within
ninety days after the later of the end of the comment period or
the date of enactment of the Act. The legislation also would
grant original and exclusive jurisdiction over certain civil
actions to the United States court of appeals for the circuit
in which the export facility will be located.
Legislative History
H.R. 6 was introduced by Representative Cory Gardner (CO-4)
on March 6, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce. On March 7, 2014, H.R. 6 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On March 25, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing on H.R. 6. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Department of Energy, Government of Hungary, Greenberg
Trauig LLP, American Public Gas Association, Charles River
Associates, and NERA Economic Consulting.
On April 8 and 9, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider H.R. 6 and
forwarded the bill, as amended, to the full Committee by a roll
call vote of 15 yeas and 11 nays.
On April 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 6, and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 33 yeas and 18 nays.
On June 19, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 6 to the House (H. Rept. 113-477), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 353).
On June 24 and 25, 2014, H.R. 6 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 636, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 266 yeas and 150
nays (Roll Call No. 359).
On June 26, 2014, H.R. 6 was received in the Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 6. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 6 were included in H.R. 2.
Resolving Environmental and Grid Reliability Conflicts Act of 2013
H.R. 271
To clarify that compliance with an emergency order under
section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act may not be considered a
violation of any Federal, State, or local environmental law or
regulation, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 271 requires the Department of Energy (DOE), in
issuing an order pursuant to section 202(c) of the Federal
Power Act that may result in a conflict with a requirement of
any Federal, State, or local environmental law or regulation,
to ensure that the order limits the generation, delivery, or
transmission of electricity to only those hours necessary to
meet the emergency and serve the public interest. DOE must
also, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure the order is
consistent with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations and minimizes adverse environmental impacts that
may occur as a result of the emergency directive. In addition,
H.R. 271 amends section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to
provide that if a party takes an action that is necessary to
comply with a section 202(c) order and such action results in
noncompliance with any Federal, State, or local environmental
law or regulation, then such action shall not be considered a
violation of such environmental law. H.R. 271 further amends
section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to require that an
order issued pursuant to section 202(c) that may result in a
conflict with an environmental law or regulation shall expire
not later than ninety days after issuance.
Legislative History
H.R. 271 was introduced by Representative Pete Olson (TX-
22) on January 15, 2013, and was referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On January 18, 2013, H.R. 271 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On May 14 and 15, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 271 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On May 20, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 271 to the House (H. Rept. 113-86), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 61).
On May 22, 2013, H.R. 271 was considered in the House under
a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On May 23, 2013, H.R. 271 was received in the Senate and
read the first time.
On June 3, 2013, H.R. 271 was read the second time and
placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders
(Calendar No. 82).
No further action was taken on H.R. 271.
Energy Consumers Relief Act of 2013
H.R. 1582
To protect consumers by prohibiting the Administrator of
the Environmental Protection Agency from promulgating as final
certain energy-related rules that are estimated to cost more
than $1 billion and will cause significant adverse effects to
the economy.
Summary
H.R. 1582 requires the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency, before promulgating a final rule that (1)
regulates the production, supply, distribution, or use of
energy and (2) is estimated by the Administrator or the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget to impose
aggregate costs of more than $1 billion, to submit a report to
Congress providing information detailing certain cost, benefit,
energy price, and job impacts. The Secretary of Department of
Energy, in consultation with other relevant agencies, shall (1)
conduct a review of the energy price, reliability, and other
energy-related impacts, and (2) make a determination about
whether the rule will cause significant adverse effects to the
economy. H.R. 1582 prohibits the Administrator from
promulgating any such final rule if the Secretary of Energy
determines that such rule will cause significant adverse
effects to the economy.
Legislative History
On April 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing on a discussion draft entitled ``Energy
Consumers Relief Act.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers,
Industrial Energy Consumers of America, Electric Reliability
Coordinating Council, NERA Economic Consulting, Center for
Progressive Reform, and the American Thoracic Society.
H.R. 1582 was introduced by Representative Bill Cassidy
(LA-6) on April 16, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On April 19, 2013, H.R. 1582 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On July 9 and 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1582 and
forwarded the bill, as amended, to the full Committee by a roll
call vote of 17 yeas and 10 nays.
On July 16 and 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1582 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 25 yeas and 18 nays.
On July 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1582 to the House (H. Rept. 113-164), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 118).
On July 31, 2013, H.R. 1582 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 315, and on August 1,
2013, the bill was passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of
232 yeas and 181 nays (Roll Call No. 432).
On September 9, 2013, H.R. 1582 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1582. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 1582 were included in H.R. 2.
Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act
H.R. 1900
To provide for the timely consideration of all licenses,
permits, and approvals required under Federal law with respect
to the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of any
natural gas pipeline projects.
Summary
H.R. 1900 amends the Natural Gas Act to direct the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to approve or deny a
certificate of public convenience and necessity within twelve
months after providing public notice of the permit application
for a natural gas pipeline project. The bill requires the
responsible agency issuing any Federal license, permit, or
approval regarding the siting, construction, expansion, or
operation of a project for which a certificate is sought, to
approve or deny issuance of the certificate within ninety days
after FERC issues its final environmental document regarding
the project. H.R. 1900 further directs FERC to grant an agency
request for a thirty-day extension of the ninety-day time
period if the agency demonstrates necessity due to unforeseen
circumstances beyond its control and states that any license,
permit, or approval shall go into effect if the responsible
agency neither approves nor denies its issuance within that
time period.
Legislative History
H.R. 1900 was introduced by Representative Mike Pompeo (KS-
4) on May 9, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce.
On May 10, 2013, H.R. 1900 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Energy and Power.
On July 9, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing on H.R. 1900, and received testimony from the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, NextEra Energy Inc., Delaware
River Keeper Network, Pipeline Safety Trust, Distribution
Contractors Association, and Interstate Natural Gas Association
of America.
On July 9 and 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1900 and
forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full Committee by
a roll call vote of 17 yeas and 9 nays.
On July 16 and 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1900, and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 28 yeas and 14 nays.
On November 18, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1900 to the House (H. Rept. 113-269), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 192).
On November 21, 2013, H.R. 1900 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 420, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 252 yeas and 165
nays (Roll Call No. 611).
On December 9, 2013, H.R. 1900 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science
and Transportation.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1900. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 1900 were included in H.R. 2.
Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2014
H.R. 2126, H.R. 540, H.R. 3820, H.R. 4066, S. 1191, S. 1261, S. 1206,
S. 1739
To promote energy efficiency, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2126 authorizes the Administrator of the General
Services Administration to consult with the Secretary of Energy
to develop model leasing provisions and voluntary best leasing
practices that will align the interests of landlords and
tenants to achieve greater energy and water efficiency in
commercial buildings. The bill also directs the Department of
Energy to conduct a study that identifies voluntary best
practices for commercial building owners and tenants to
consider when they design and construct new tenant spaces,
which are rented at the start of a lease and are ``fitted-out''
before the tenant takes occupancy. Finally, H.R. 2126
establishes a ``Tenant Star'' voluntary recognition program
developed by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy.
Legislative History
H.R. 2126 was introduced by Representative David B.
McKinley (WV-1) on May 23, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce. On May 24, 2013, H.R. 2126 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On January 27 and 28, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2126 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On February 28, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2126 to the House (H. Rept. 113-371), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 277).
On March 4 and 5, 2014, H.R. 2126 was considered in the
House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 375 yeas and 36 nays
(Roll Call No. 98).
On March 6, 2014, H.R. 2126 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
No further action was taken on H.R. 2126.
Energy Savings Through Public-Private Partnerships Act of 2013
H.R. 2689
To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to
encourage the increased use of performance contracting in
Federal facilities.
Summary
H.R. 2689 facilitates the use of energy savings performance
contracts and utility energy service contracts to utilize
private sector investment to upgrade the energy and water
efficiency of Federal facilities by requiring facility energy
managers to consider implementing any life cycle cost-effective
measures identified after the completion of a comprehensive
energy and water evaluation. Agencies shall use a benchmarking
system to track savings realized through efficiency upgrades
and are required to submit the information to the Department of
Energy for publication.
Legislative History
H.R. 2689 was introduced by Representative Cory Gardner
(CO-4) on July 16, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On July 19, 2013, H.R. 2689 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On April 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2689 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On November 19, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2689 to the House (H. Rept. 113-627), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 467).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2689.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reorganization Plan Codification and
Complements Act
H.R. 3132
To ensure orderly conduct of Nuclear Regulatory Commission
actions.
Summary
H.R. 3132 codifies and expands the Reorganization Plan No.
1 of 1980, which governs the administration of the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC). H.R. 3132 provides that specified
functions are vested in the Commission acting as a whole,
including the distribution of appropriated funds according to
programs proposed by the Executive Director for Operations,
policy formulation, rulemaking, and orders and adjudications.
In addition, H.R. 3132 revises provisions of the Reorganization
Act relating to (1) the appointment of NRC officers and
employees, (2) the role of the NRC Chairman, (3) the scope of
the emergency authority of the NRC Chairman, and (4) the NRC's
reporting procedures. H.R. 3132 also sets forth NRC policy with
respect to (1) the certification of documents transmitted to
Congress, (2) the time limits for review of Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board decisions and actions, (3) the allegations of
wrongdoing on the part of the NRC Chairman, and (4) the
approval of international travel requests by NRC members.
Legislative History
H.R. 3132 was introduced by Representative Lee Terry (NE-2)
on September 18, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce.
On September 20, 2013, H.R. 3132 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On December 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing on the bill and received testimony from the NRC
Chairman and Commissioners.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3132.
North American Energy Infrastructure Act
H.R. 3301
To require approval for the construction, connection,
operation, or maintenance of oil or natural gas pipelines or
electric transmission facilities at the national boundary of
the United States for the import or export of oil, natural gas,
or electricity to or from Canada or Mexico, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3301 requires the Secretary of Commerce, with respect
to oil pipelines, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
with respect to natural gas pipelines, or the Secretary of
Energy, with respect to electric transmission facilities, to
approve a request for approval of construction, connection,
operation, or maintenance unless it is not in U.S. national
security interests. H.R. 3301 further declares that such an
approval shall not be construed to constitute a major Federal
action for purposes of environmental review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, makes conforming amendments
to the Federal Power Act, and eliminates the requirement for
Department of Energy approval of natural gas exports or imports
to or from Canada or Mexico.
The bill also provides that no Presidential permit required
under specified executive orders shall be necessary for
activities covered by the approval provisions. In addition, it
provides that no approval under this bill, or under a
Presidential permit specified by this bill, shall be required
for modifications to facilities covered by this bill, including
expansions and flow reversals.
Legislative History
H.R. 3301 was introduced by Representative Fred Upton (MI-
6) on October 22, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on
Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Natural
Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On October 29, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing on H.R. 3301 and received testimony from the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Manhattan Institute,
the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Canadian
Electricity Association, the Association of Oil Pipelines, the
Institute for Energy Research, and Blackcreek Environmental
Consulting.
On November 19 and 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3301 and
forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full Committee by
a roll call vote of 19 yeas and 10 nays.
On May 7 and 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3301 and ordered
the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a roll
call vote of 31 yeas and 19 nays.
On June 19, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3301 to the House (H. Rept. 113-482, Part I), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 358).
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 3301 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 636, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 238 yeas and 173
nays (Roll Call No. 354).
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 3301 was received in the Senate,
read the first time, and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar
under Read the First Time. On June 26, 2014, H.R. 3301 was read
the second time and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 442).
No further action was taken on H.R. 3301. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 3301 were included in H.R. 2.
SHARE Act
H.R. 3590
To protect and enhance opportunities for recreational
hunting, fishing, and shooting, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3590, in part, amends the Toxic Substances Control Act
to exclude from the definition of ``chemical substance'' for
purposes of such Act: (1) any component of any pistol,
revolver, firearm, shell, or cartridge the sale of which is
subject to Federal excise tax, including shot, bullets, and
other projectiles, propellants, and primers; and (2) any sport
fishing equipment the sale of which is subject to Federal
excise tax and sport fishing equipment components.
Legislative History
H.R. 3590 was introduced by Representative Robert E. Latta
on November 11, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Natural
Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, the
Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On February 4, 2014, H.R. 3590 was considered in the House
under the provisions of H.Res. 470, and the bill was passed, as
amended, by a roll call vote of 268 yeas and 154 nays (Roll
Call No. 41).
On February 6, 2014, H.R. 3590 was received in the Senate,
read the first time, and placed on the Senate Legislative
Calendar under Read the First Time. On February 10, 2014, H.R.
3590 was read the second time and placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 305).
No further action was taken on H.R. 3590.
National Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act of
2014
H.R. 3696
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain
improvements regarding cybersecurity and critical
infrastructure protection, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3696, in part, directs the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) to enter into an agreement with the
National Research Council to conduct research of the future
resilience and reliability of the Nation's electric power
transmission and distribution system and directs the Council to
submit to DHS and Congress a report containing the findings of
the research. H.R. 3696 also directs DHS to ensure that the
Council receives full and timely cooperation, including full
access to information and personnel, from the Department of
Homeland Security, the Department of Energy, including the
management and operating components of the Departments, and
other Federal departments and agencies, as necessary, for the
purposes of conducting the study.
Legislative History
H.R. 3696 was introduced by Representative Michael McCaul
on December 13, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security, and in addition to the Committees on Science, Space,
and Technology, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker (prior to
consideration of the bill on the Floor, the Committee on Energy
and Commerce and the Committee on Homeland Security exchanged
letters acknowledging the Committee on Energy and Commerce's
jurisdictional interest in the bill).
On January 7, 2014, H.R. 3696 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies.
On January 15, 2014, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 3696 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On February 5, 2014, the Committee on Homeland Security met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 3696 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a voice
vote.
On July 23, 2014, the Committee on Homeland Security
reported H.R. 3696 to the House (H. Rept. 113-550, Part 1), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 411).
On July 28, 2014, H.R. 3696 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 29, 2014, H.R. 3696 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3696.
Electricity Security and Affordability Act
H.R. 3826, S. 1905
To provide direction to the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency regarding the establishment of
standards for emissions of any greenhouse gas from fossil fuel-
fired electric utility generating units, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3826 provides direction to the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the agency's pending
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards for fossil fuel-fired
power plants. The bill requires that, for any GHG standards
developed by the EPA for new plants, the agency (1) establish
separate standards for natural gas and coal-fired power plants;
and (2) set standards for coal-fired power plants that reflect
emissions levels that have been demonstrated to be achievable
using commercially available technologies. H.R. 3826 also
requires that for any GHG standards, rules, or guidelines
developed by the EPA for reconstructed, modified, or existing
plants, the EPA Administrator report to Congress on the cost
and other impacts, and the regulation shall not take effect
unless Congress enacts a Federal law specifying the effective
date.
Legislative History
On October 28, 2013, Representative Ed Whitfield (KY-1) and
Senator Joe Manchin (WV) released a discussion draft entitled
``To provide direction to the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency regarding the establishment of
standards for emissions of any greenhouse gas from fossil fuel-
fired electric utility generating units, and for other
purposes,'' and on November 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on
Energy and Power held a hearing on the bill. The Subcommittee
received testimony from Senator Manchin, the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Attorney General for the State of
Oklahoma, East Kentucky Power Cooperative, an engineering
consultant, Natural Resources Defense Council, the Mayor of
Fulton, Arkansas, North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Analysis Group, and National Association of
Manufacturers.
H.R. 3826 was introduced by Representative Whitfield on
January 9, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce. On January 10, 2014, H.R. 3826 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On January 13 and 14, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3826 and
forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full Committee by
a roll call vote of 18 yeas and 11 nays.
On January 27 and 28, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3826 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a roll call vote of 29 yeas and 19 nays.
On February 28, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3826 to the House (H. Rept. 113-365), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 271).
On March 5 and 6, 2014, H.R. 3826 was considered in the
House pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 497, and the bill
was passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 229 yeas and 183
nays (Roll Call No. 106).
On March 10, 2014, H.R. 3826 was received in the Senate,
and on May 7, 2014, the bill was read the first time and placed
on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. On
June May 8, 2014, H.R. 3826 was read the second time and placed
on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar
No. 374).
No further action was taken on H.R. 3826. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 3826 were included in H.R. 2.
Streamlining Energy Efficiency for Schools Act of 2014
H.R. 4092
To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to
establish the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
as the lead Federal agency for coordinating Federal, State, and
local assistance provided to promote the energy retrofitting of
schools.
Summary
H.R. 4092 establishes a clearinghouse within the Department
of Energy to consolidate and maintain information regarding
available Federal programs and financing mechanisms that may be
used by schools to develop and implement energy efficiency,
distributed generation, and energy retrofitting projects.
Legislative History
H.R. 4092 was introduced by Representative Matt Cartwright
(PA-17) on February 26, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On February 28, 2014, H.R. 4092 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On April 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4092 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On June 19, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4092 to the House (H. Rept. 113-479), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 355).
On June 23, 2014, H.R. 4092 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 4092 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4092.
Promoting New Manufacturing Act
H.R. 4795
To promote new manufacturing in the United States by
providing for greater transparency and timeliness in obtaining
necessary permits, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4795 addresses preconstruction permits required under
the Clean Air Act for major stationary sources, and would
require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency (1) to publish information regarding the estimated
number of permits issued annually and timelines for making
final permit decisions; (2) to issue implementing guidance and
regulations simultaneously when establishing new or revised air
quality standards affecting the permitting process; and (3) to
report annually to Congress on agency actions to expedite the
processing of permit applications.
Legislative History
On May 21, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing on a discussion draft entitled the ``Promoting New
Manufacturing Act.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
the American Chemistry Council, National Association of
Manufacturers, Environmental Resources Management, Small
Business and Entrepreneurship Council, Natural Resources
Defense Council, and the Delaware Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Control.
On May 28 and 29, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and
Power met in open markup session to consider the discussion
draft and forwarded the bill, as amended, to the full Committee
by a roll call vote of 14 yeas and 8 nays.
H.R. 4795 was introduced by Representative Steve Scalise
(LA-1) on May 30, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce. On June 6, 2014, H.R. 4795 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Energy and Power. H.R. 4795 was substantially
similar to the discussion draft forwarded to the full Committee
On June 9 and 10, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4795 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a roll call vote of 30 yeas and 19 nays.
On June 23, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4795 to the House (H. Rept. 113-488), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 363).
On November 20, 2014, H.R. 4795 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 756, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 238 yeas and 172
nays (Roll Call No. 531).
On December 1, 2014, H.R. 4795 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4795.
Thermal Insulation Efficiency Improvement Act
H.R. 4801
To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a report on
the impact of thermal insulation on both energy and water use
for potable hot water.
Summary
H.R. 4801 requires the Department of Energy, in
consultation with other Federal agencies and relevant
stakeholders, to submit a report to Congress on the impact of
thermal insulation on both energy and water use systems for
potable hot and chilled water in Federal buildings, and the
return on investment of installing such insulation.
Legislative History
H.R. 4801 was introduced by Representative Adam Kinzinger
(IL-16) on June 5, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On June 6, 2014, H.R. 4801 was referred to
the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
On June 9 and 10, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4801 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On June 23, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4801 to the House (H. Rept. 113-489), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 364).
On June 23, 2014, H.R. 4801 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 4801 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4801.
To Approve the Keystone XL Pipeline
H.R. 5682, S. 2280
To approve the Keystone XL Pipeline.
Summary
The legislation authorizes TransCanada Keystone Pipeline,
L.P. to construct, connect, operate, and maintain the pipeline
and cross-border facilities specified in an application filed
by TransCanada Corporation to the U.S. Department of State on
May 4, 2012.
The bill deems the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement regarding the pipeline issued by the Secretary of
State in January 2014 to fully satisfy the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and any law that requires
Federal agency consultation or review, including the Endangered
Species Act of 1973.
The bill declares any applicable Federal permit or
authorization issued before enactment of this Act to remain in
effect.
The bill restricts any legal challenges regarding a Federal
agency action and such facilities to judicial review on direct
appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit.
The bill declares that this Act does not alter any Federal,
State, or local process or condition in effect on the date of
enactment of this Act that is necessary to secure access from
an owner of private property to construct the pipeline and
cross-border facilities.
Legislative History
H.R. 5682 was introduced by Representative Bill Cassidy
(LA-6) on November 12, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on Natural
Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On November 13, 2014, H.R. 5682 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 748, and on November 14,
2014, the bill was passed, without amendment, by a roll call
vote of 252 yeas, 161 nays, 1 present (Roll Call No. 419).
On November 17, 2014, H.R. 5682 was received in the Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 5682.
S. 2280 was introduced by Senator John Hoeven (ND) on May
1, 2014, read the first time and placed on Senate Legislative
Calendar under Read the First Time.
On May 5, 2014, S. 2280 was read the second time and placed
on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar
No. 371).
On November 18, 2014, S. 2280 was laid before the Senate by
unanimous consent, and under the order of November 12, 2014,
not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, the bill was
defeated a roll call vote of 59 yeas and 41 nays (Roll Call No.
280).
No further action was taken on H.R. 5682 or S. 2280.
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
American Energy Security and Innovation: An Assessment of North
America's Energy Resources
On February 5, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing entitled ``American Energy Security and
Innovation: An Assessment of North America's Energy Resources''
to discuss the nation's changing energy paradigm and to
consider the implications for the U.S. economy and the global
energy market. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Energy Information Administration, IHS, World Resources
Institute, Institute for Energy Research, and ICF
International.
American Energy Security and Innovation: An Assessment of Private-
Sector Successes and Opportunities in Energy Efficient Technologies
On February 26, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing focused on private sector innovations and
opportunities in energy efficient technologies and examined new
and innovative ways to reduce waste and cut costs for
businesses and the Federal government. The Subcommittee
received testimony from Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK), Senator
Jeanne Shaheen (NH), the Department of Energy, ABB Inc., on
behalf of the National Electric Manufacturers Association and
Industrial Energy Efficiency Coalition, Federal Performance
Contracting Coalition, U.S. Combined Heat and Power
Association, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, American Council
for an Energy-Efficient Economy, and The Brookings Institution.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Policy and Governance Challenges
On February 28, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
and the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a
joint hearing focused on Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
decisions and actions relating to licensing, policy making, and
the Commission's operating procedures. The Subcommittees
received testimony from the Chairman and Commissioners of the
NRC.
American Energy Security and Innovation: The Role of a Diverse
Electricity Generation Portfolio
On March 5, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing to examine the role of fuel diversity in the nation's
electricity generation mix in ensuring affordable and reliable
electricity for American consumers. The Subcommittee received
testimony from American Electric Power, American Municipal
Power, Inc., Entergy Wholesale Commodities, American Wind
Energy Association, Xcel Energy, and the Nebraska Public Power
District on behalf of the Alliance for Fuel Options,
Reliability, and Diversity.
American Energy Security and Innovation: The Role of Regulators and
Grid Operators in Meeting Natural Gas and Electric Coordination
Challenges
On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing to examine the role of Federal and State
regulators and electric grid operators in meeting the
challenges resulting from the increased use of natural gas to
generate electricity and the convergence of the natural gas and
electric industries. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Railroad Commission
of Texas, Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio, Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator, Inc., ISO New England, Inc., and the Analysis
Group.
U.S. Energy Abundance: Exports and the Changing Global Energy Landscape
On May 7, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a
hearing to examine the impacts of exporting U.S. energy
resources, particularly liquefied natural gas, in the United
States and abroad. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Johnston and Associates, the Bipartisan Policy Center, World
Resources Institute, Truman National Security Project,
Columbiana County Board of Commissioners, and the U.C. Davis
Graduate School of Management.
American Energy Security and Innovation: Grid Reliability Challenges in
a Shifting Energy Resource Landscape
On May 9, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a
hearing to examine the reliability challenges and consumer
impacts resulting from the increased use of natural gas and
renewables in the nation's electricity generation portfolio.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the Interstate Natural
Gas Association of America, Electric Power Supply Association,
Industrial Energy Consumers of America, Center for American
Progress Action Fund, American Wind Energy Association, and
Continental Economics, Inc.
The FY 2014 EPA Budget
On May 16, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power and
the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a joint
hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed
budget for Fiscal Year 2014. The purpose of the hearing was to
evaluate EPA's proposed budget, which affects issues such as
funding for activities related to the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
hazardous materials reporting mechanisms, climate change, air
quality programs, drinking water system compliance, cleanup of
hazardous waste sites within the Superfund account, scientific
research that underpins regulatory decision-making, and
homeland security activities. The Subcommittees received
testimony from the Acting Administrator of EPA.
The FY 2014 DOE Budget
On June 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing on the Department of Energy's proposed budget for
Fiscal Year 2014. The purpose of the hearing was to examine and
evaluate funding priorities; major budget changes; planned
rulemaking; priority science and research; loans and grants;
management and security; and enforcement activities. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Secretary of Energy.
U.S. Energy Abundance: Regulatory, Market, and Legal Barriers to Export
On June 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing focused on the barriers to and issues concerning
exporting coal and liquefied natural gas from the United
States. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Army Corps
of Engineers, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department
of Energy, the Mayor of Seattle, WA, National Mining
Association, National Association of Manufacturers, Climate
Solutions, Energy Policy Research Foundation, Inc., and the
Center for Liquefied Natural Gas.
U.S. Energy Abundance: Manufacturing Competitiveness and America's
Energy Advantage
On June 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power and
the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade held a
joint hearing entitled ``U.S. Energy Abundance: Manufacturing
Competitiveness and America's Energy Advantage.'' The
Subcommittees examined how energy prices and consumption affect
the U.S. manufacturing industry. The Subcommittees received
testimony from Industrial Energy Consumers of America, AC&S
Incorporated, on behalf of the American Chemistry Council, The
Pew Charitable Trusts, Marlin Steel Wire Products, on behalf of
the National Association of Manufacturers, and Sasol Limited.
Overview of the Renewable Fuel Standards: Government Perspectives
On June 26, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing to examine the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). Members
and witnesses discussed the implementation challenges and other
issues associated with the RFS, including the blend wall fuel
compatibility issues, impacts of the RFS on energy markets and
the agricultural sector, and environmental concerns. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Energy Information
Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the
Department of Agriculture.
Overview of the Renewable Fuel Standard: Stakeholder Perspectives
On July 23 and July 24, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy
and Power held a hearing to discuss a range of issues
associated with the Renewable Fuel Standard, including its
potential effect on fuel and food prices, the blend wall, fuel
compatibility issues, and impacts on the nation's agricultural
sector and the environment. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the American Petroleum Institute, American Fuel and
Petrochemical Manufacturers, Renewable Fuels Association,
Advanced Biofuel Association, Union of Concerned Scientists,
Growth Energy, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Briggs
and Stratton Corporation, American Automobile Association, the
Cumberland Gulf Group, on behalf of the Society of Independent
Gasoline Marketers of America and the National Association of
Convenience Stores, National Biodiesel Board, National Corn
Growers Association, National Chicken Council, Wen-Gap LLC, on
behalf of the National Council of Chain Restaurants,
Environmental Working Group, and Purdue University.
The Obama Administration's Climate Change Policies and Activities
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing entitled ``The Obama Administration's Climate
Change Polices and Activities.'' The purpose of the hearing was
to examine Federal agencies' current and planned climate change
activities, including the actions identified in the President's
Climate Action Plan released on June 25, 2013. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency and the Secretary of Energy.
Evaluating the Role of FERC in a Changing Energy Landscape
On December 5, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing on the legal and regulatory authorities of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the manner in
which it has been carrying out its statutory duties under the
Federal Power Act, Natural Gas Act, and other authorities. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Acting Chairman and
Commissioners of FERC.
Oversight of NRC Management and the Need for Legislative Reform
On December 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
and the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a
joint hearing on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC)
management and operations, including the Commission's activity
related to restarting the Yucca mountain licensing process. The
Subcommittees received testimony from the Chairman and
Commissioners of the NRC.
Benefits of and Challenges to Energy Access in the 21st Century:
Electricity
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing to examine the benefits of access to affordable
and reliable electricity, as well as current challenges to
expanding electricity access. The Subcommittee received
testimony from the North Carolina Utilities Commission, Global
Development, Synapse Energy Economics, Northern Arkansas
Electric Cooperative, Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Council, and Oxfam America.
Benefits of and Challenges to Energy Access in the 21st Century: Fuel
Supply and Infrastructure
On March 6, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing to explore the role of rail, pipelines, and trucking
in moving America's energy supplies to markets, and the impact
of infrastructure on natural gas and propane supplies and
prices. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Energy
Information Administration, Interstate Natural Gas Association
of America, National Propane Gas Association, Ceres, American
Trucking Association and the National Tank Truck Carriers,
World Resources Institute, Association of Oil Pipe Lines, and
the Association of American Railroads.
The Fiscal Year 2015 EPA Budget
On April 2, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power and
the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a joint
hearing to review the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
Fiscal Year 2015 budget request. The purpose of the hearing was
to evaluate EPA's proposed budget, which effects issues such as
funding for activities related to the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
hazardous materials reporting mechanisms, climate change, air
quality programs, drinking water system compliance, cleanup of
hazardous waste sites within the Superfund account, scientific
research that underpins regulatory decision-making, and
homeland security activities. The Subcommittees received
testimony from the Administrator of the EPA.
The Fiscal Year 2015 DOE Budget
On April 3, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing on the Department of Energy's proposed budget for
Fiscal Year 2015. The purpose of the hearing was to examine and
evaluate funding priorities, major budget changes, planned
rulemakings, priority science and research, loans and grants,
management and security, and enforcement activities. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Secretary of Energy.
The NRC FY 2015 Budget and Policy Issues
On May 7, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a
hearing on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) proposed
budget for Fiscal Year 2015 and associated policy issues. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Chairman and
Commissioners of the NRC.
EPA's Proposed Carbon Dioxide Regulations for Power Plants
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing to examine EPA's proposed greenhouse gas regulations
for existing power plants. The hearing addressed the details of
the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) power plant
proposal and its effect on jobs, the economy, and the
environment. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation of the
EPA.
Laboratories of Democracy: The Economic Impacts of State Energy
Policies
On July 24, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing to examine the economic impacts from the differing
energy policies of the various States, as well as how Federal
policies may impact States. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Bureau of Business and Economic Research at the
University of Montana, Energy and Environment Legal Institute,
Manhattan Institute, Maguire Energy Institute at the Cox School
of Business, Southern Methodist University, Union of Concerned
Scientists, and the American Council for an Energy-Efficient
Economy.
FERC Perspectives: Questions Concerning EPA's Proposed Clean Power Plan
and Other Grid Reliability Challenges
On July 29, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held
a hearing to hear the perspective of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) Commissioners on the Environmental
Protection Agency's proposed rule limiting carbon dioxide
emissions from the nation's power plants, and how the rule
would impact reliability and electricity markets. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Chairman and
Commissioners of FERC.
State Perspectives: Questions Concerning EPA's Proposed Clean Power
Plan
On September 9, 2014, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power
held a hearing on State perspectives on the Environmental
Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan, including implementation
challenges. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Public
Utility Commission of Texas, Montana Public Service Commission,
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Indiana Department
of Environmental Management, Maryland Public Service
Commission, and the Washington Utilities and Transportation
Commission.
White Papers on the Renewable Fuel Standard
The Subcommittee on Energy and Power released a series of
bipartisan white papers examining emerging issues related to
the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and inviting comment from
stakeholders.
The first white paper focused on the blend wall and fuel
compatibility issues--the challenges related to blending the
volumes of biofuels specified in the RFS into a fuel supply
that has declined since 2007. Among other issues, this white
paper addressed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
partial waiver to allow up to fifteen percent ethanol blends
(E-15) for model year 2001 and newer passenger vehicles, its
mis-fueling mitigation plans applicable to fuel retailers that
carry E-15, and the interaction between EPA's fuel economy
standards and the RFS.
The second white paper addressed the impacts of the RFS on
the agricultural sector, rural economy, and food supply. It
also addressed the State petitions to waive the RFS in response
to the summer 2012 drought, which reduced corn yields and
increased prices, and EPA's denial of these waiver petitions.
The third white paper assessed the environmental
requirements in the RFS, particularly the provisions for
reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation
sector.
The fourth white paper reviewed the changing energy policy
context of the RFS, including the post-2007 increase in
domestic oil production and decline in consumption, as well as
the emergence of other transportation fuel options.
The fifth and final white paper addressed implementation
issues with the RFS. This included EPA's annual rules setting
out the actual percentage targets for the four categories of
renewable fuels, known as renewable volume obligations,
including those for cellulosic biofuels. This white paper also
discussed the agency's administration of Renewable
Identification Number markets.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``American Energy Security and Innovation:
An Assessment of North America's Energy Resources.'' (February
5, 2013) Serial Number 113-1.
Hearing entitled ``American Energy Security and Innovation:
An Assessment of Private-Sector Successes and Opportunities in
Energy Efficient Technologies.'' (February 26, 2013) Serial
Number 113-8.
Hearing entitled ``The Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Policy and Governance Challenges.'' (February 28, 2013) Serial
Number 113-11.
Hearing entitled ``American Energy Security and Innovation:
The Role of a Diverse Electricity Generation Portfolio.''
(March 5, 2013) Serial Number 113-12.
Hearing entitled ``American Energy Security and Innovation:
The Role of Regulators and Grid Operators in Meeting Natural
Gas and Electric Coordination Challenges.'' (March 19, 2013)
Serial Number 113-19.
Hearing entitled ``H.R. 3, the `Northern Route Approval
Act.''' (April 10, 2013) Serial Number 113-26.
Hearing entitled ``Discussion Draft of H.R. __, `Energy
Consumers Relief Act of 2013.''' (April 12, 2013) Serial Number
113-30.
Hearing entitled ``U.S. Energy Abundance: Exports and the
Changing Global Energy Landscape.'' (May 7, 2013) Serial Number
113-38.
Hearing entitled ``American Energy Security and Innovation:
Grid Reliability Challenges in a Shifting Energy Resource
Landscape.'' (May 9, 2013) Serial Number 113-40.
Hearing entitled ``The Fiscal Year 2014 Environmental
Protection Agency Budget.'' (May 16, 2013) Serial Number 113-
42.
Hearing entitled ``The Fiscal Year 2014 U.S. Department of
Energy Budget.'' (June 13, 2013) Serial Number 113-53.
Hearing entitled ``U.S. Energy Abundance: Regulatory,
Market, and Legal Barriers to Export.'' (June 18, 2013) Serial
Number 113-57.
Hearing entitled ``U.S. Energy Abundance: Manufacturing
Competitiveness and America's Energy Advantage.'' (June 20,
2013) Serial Number 113-58.
Hearing entitled ``Overview of the Renewable Fuel Standard:
Government Perspectives.'' (June 26, 2013) Serial Number 113-
61.
Hearing entitled ``H.R. 1900, `Natural Gas Pipeline
Permitting Reform Act.''' (July 9, 2013) Serial Number 113-66.
Hearing entitled ``Overview of the Renewable Fuel Standard:
Stakeholder Perspectives.'' (July 23 and July 24, 2013) Serial
Number 113-73.
Hearing entitled ``The Obama Administration's Climate
Change Policies and Activities.'' (September 18, 2013) Serial
Number 113-82.
Hearing entitled ``H.R. 3301, the North American Energy
Infrastructure Act.'' (October 29, 2013) Serial Number 113-88.
Hearing entitled ``EPA's Proposed GHG Standards for New
Power Plants and H.R. __, Whitfield-Manchin Legislation.''
(November 14, 2013) Serial Number 113-94.
Hearing entitled ``Evaluating the Role of FERC in a
Changing Energy Landscape'' (December 5, 2013) Serial Number
113-106.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of NRC Management and the Need
for Legislative Reform.'' (December 12, 2013) Serial Number
113-110.
Hearing entitled ``Benefits of and Challenges to Energy
Access in the 21st Century: Electricity'' (February 27, 2014)
Serial Number 113-121.
Hearing entitled ``Benefits of and Challenges to Energy
Access in the 21st Century: Fuel Supply and Infrastructure''
(March 6, 2014) Serial Number 113-124.
Hearing entitled ``H.R. 6, the Domestic Prosperity and
Global Freedom Act'' (March 25, 2014) Serial Number 113-129.
Hearing entitled ``The Fiscal Year 2015 EPA Budget'' (April
2, 2014) Serial Number 113-133.
Hearing entitled ``The Fiscal Year 2015 DOE Budget'' (April
3, 2014) Serial Number 113-135.
Hearing entitled ``The NRC FY 2015 Budget and Policy
Issues'' (May 7, 2014) Serial Number 113-143.
Hearing entitled ``Promoting New Manufacturing Act'' (May
21, 2014) Serial Number 113-147.
Hearing entitled ``EPA's Proposed Carbon Dioxide
Regulations for Power Plants'' (June 19, 2014) Serial Number
113-155.
Hearing entitled ``Laboratories of Democracy: The Economic
Impacts of State Energy Policies'' (July 24, 2014) Serial
Number 113-165.
Hearing entitled ``FERC Perspectives: Questions Concerning
EPA's Proposed Clean Power Plan and other Grid Reliability
Challenges'' (July 29, 2014) Serial Number 113-168.
Hearing entitled ``State Perspectives: Questions Concerning
EPA's Proposed Clean Power Plan'' (September 9, 2014) Serial
Number 113-172.
Hearing entitled ``A hearing on H.R. 4526, the 21st Century
Energy Workforce Development Jobs Initiative Act of 2014''
(September 17, 2014) Serial Number 113-174.
Hearing entitled ``The Energy Policy and Conservation Act
of 1975: Are We Positioning America for Success in an Era of
Energy Abundance?'' (December 11, 2014) Serial Number 113-187.
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy
(Ratio 14-11)
JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois, Chairman
PAUL TONKO, New York, PHIL GINGREY, Georgia,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey RALPH M. HALL, Texas
GENE GREEN, Texas ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania
LOIS CAPPS, California TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania
JERRY McNERNEY, California ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
JOHN BARROW, Georgia DAVID B. McKINLEY, West Virginia
DORIS O. MATSUI, California GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
(Ex Officio) JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: All matters relating to soil and water contamination; The
regulation of solid, hazardous, and nuclear wastes; The regulation of
industrial plant security; The regulation of drinking water; and, The
regulation of toxic substances and noise.
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
Community Fire Safety Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-64 (H.R. 3588)
To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire
hydrants from the prohibition on the use of lead pipes,
fittings, fixtures, solder, and flux.
Summary
H.R. 3588 amends the Safe Drinking Water Act to include
fire hydrants among the plumbing items statutorily exempted
from certain prohibitions on the use or sale of lead pipes,
solder, and flux and directs the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency to (1) consult with the
National Drinking Water Advisory Council on potential changes
to Federal regulations pertaining to lead and (2) request the
Council consider sources of lead throughout drinking water
distribution systems, including through components used to
reroute drinking water during distribution system repairs.
Legislative History
On November 21, 2013, H.R. 3588 was introduced by
Representative Bill Johnson (OH-6) and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce.
On December 2, 2013, H.R. 3588 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 384 yeas and 0 nays
(Roll Call No. 613).
On December 9, 2013, H.R. 3588 was received in the Senate
and read twice.
On December 17, 2013, H.R. 3588 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 19, 2013, H.R. 3588 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 20,
2013 (Public Law 113-64).
Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities From Terrorist Attacks Act
of 2014
public law 113-__ (h.r. 4007)
To recodify and reauthorize the Chemical Facility Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program.
Summary
H.R. 4007 authorizes the Department of Homeland Security's
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program (CFATS) for
three years at present funding levels. CFATS was established
pursuant to section 550 of the Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act of 2007 (P.L. 109-295). H.R. 4007
incorporates CFATS into the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6
U.S.C. 101 et seq.) under Title XXI.
Legislative History
H.R. 4007 was introduced by Representative Patrick Meehan
on February 6, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On February 7, 2014, H.R. 4007 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy, and on February
11, 2014, H.R. 4007 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies.
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies held a
legislative hearing on H.R. 4007.
On April 3, 2014, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 4007 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On April 30, 2014, the Committee on Homeland Security met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 4007 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a voice
vote.
On June 23, 2014, the Committee on Homeland Security
reported H.R. 4007 to the House (H. Rept. 113-491, Part 1), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 366).
On July 8, 2014, H.R. 4007 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 9, 2014, H.R. 4007 was received in the Senate, read
twice, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
On July 30, 2014, the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs met in open markup session to consider
H.R. 4007 and ordered the bill favorably reported to the
Senate, as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 18, 2014, the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs reported H.R. 4007 to the Senate
(Rept. 113-263), and the bill was placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 578).
On December 10, 2014, H.R. 4007 passed the Senate, as
amended, by unanimous consent.
On December 11, 2014, H.R. 4007 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended by the Senate, by a voice vote.
On December 12, 2014, H.R. 4007 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act of 2013
H.R. 2218
To amend subtitle D of the Solid Waste Disposal Act to
encourage recovery and beneficial use of coal combustion
residuals and establish requirements for the proper management
and disposal of coal combustion residuals that are protective
of human health and the environment.
Summary
H.R. 2218 would provide for the management and disposal of
coal combustion residuals (CCR) under subtitle D of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act. H.R. 2218 would allow States to create and
enforce their own CCR permit programs while providing the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with limited authority to
review States' permit programs. H.R. 2218 would enable EPA to
directly regulate CCR in States that fail to set up their own
programs or in States where the permit program is determined to
be deficient and is not subsequently remedied by the State.
Legislative History
On April 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing on a discussion draft entitled the
``Coal Ash Recycling and Oversight Act of 2013.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Environmental
Protection Agency, a former Assistant Administrator at the
Environmental Protection Agency, the Alabama Department of
Environmental Management, Earthjustice, the Tennessee
Department of Environment and Conservation, on behalf of the
Environmental Council of the States, and a mine safety and
health and environment consultant.
H.R. 2218 was introduced by Representative David B.
McKinley (WV-1) on June 3, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce. On June 4, 2013, H.R. 2218 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy. H.R. 2218
was substantially similar to the discussion draft entitled
``Coal Ash Recycling and Oversight Act of 2013.''
On June 5 and 6, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2218
and forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full
Committee by a voice vote.
On June 18 and 19, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2218 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 31 yeas and 16 nays.
On July 10, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2218 to the House (H. Rept. 113-148), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 107).
On July 25, 2013, H.R. 2218 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 315, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 265 yeas and 155
nays (Roll Call No. 418).
On July 29, 2013, H.R. 2218 was received in the Senate,
read the first time, and placed on the Senate Legislative
Calendar under Read the First Time.
On July 30, 2013, H.R. 2218 was read the second time and
placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders
(Calendar No. 153).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2218.
Federal and State Partnership for Environmental Protection Act of 2013
H.R. 2226
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 relating to State
consultation on removal and remedial actions, State concurrence
with listing on the National Priorities List, and State credit
for contributions to the removal or remedial action, and for
other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2226 codifies existing policy and regulations to
ensure that States have a role in response actions under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). It allows States to provide
input regarding removal actions and the selection of remedial
actions. The bill also allows States to receive in-kind credit
toward State cost share requirements for providing goods and
services that directly benefit removal and remedial actions.
The legislation also authorizes States to identify a site for
listing on the National Priorities List (NPL) every five years
and ensures that States are able to object to the listing of
sites to the NPL. The legislation also provides that State
environmental covenant laws and other engineering or land use
control laws and regulations are properly considered under
CERCLA.
Legislative History
The Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a
hearing on a discussion draft entitled ``Federal and State
Partnership for Environmental Protection Act of 2013'' on May
17 and May 22, 2013. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Earthjustice, the City Manager of Garfield, New Jersey, the
Environmental Council of the States, the Assistant Attorney
General of Colorado, on behalf of the Hazardous Materials and
Waste Management Division of the Colorado Department of Public
Health and the Environment, the Government Accountability
Office; and the Congressional Research Service.
H.R. 2226 was introduced by Representative Bill Johnson
(OH-6) on June 3, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker. On June 4, 2013, H.R.
2226 was referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy. H.R. 2226 was substantially similar to the discussion
draft entitled ``Federal and State Partnership for
Environmental Protection Act of 2013.''
On June 5 and 6, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2226
and forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full
Committee by a roll call vote of 11 yeas and 7 nays.
On June 18 and 19, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2226 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 27 yeas and 19 nays.
On July 30, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2226 to the House (H. Rept. 113-178, Part I). The
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure was granted an
extension for further consideration ending not later than
November 1, 2013.
On November 1, 2013, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure was discharged from further consideration of
H.R. 2226, and the bill was placed on the Union Calendar
(Calendar No. 182).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2226. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 2226 were included in H.R. 2279.
Reducing Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of 2013
H.R. 2279
To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act relating to review of
regulations under such Act and to amend the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
relating to financial responsibility for classes of facilities.
Summary
Title I of H.R. 2279 removes deadlines for certain
rulemaking activities conducted by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) under the Solid Waste Disposal Act and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA). The legislation would repeal a deadline
in the Solid Waste Disposal Act, giving EPA greater discretion
to prioritize, review, and, if necessary, revise its
regulations. The legislation also requires EPA, before
promulgating financial responsibility requirements under
CERCLA, to evaluate existing State or other Federal financial
assurance requirements to determine whether additional
requirements are necessary. Should EPA determine that
additional financial assurance requirements are necessary to
prevent the United States from incurring response costs under
section 104 of CERCLA, the legislation protects the existing
State or Federal requirements by requiring that EPA accept
compliance with the existing requirements in lieu of compliance
with the new EPA requirements. Additionally, the legislation
also requires that the owner or operator of a facility that
stores chemicals listed on the Department of Homeland Security
Chemicals of Interest that are flammables or explosives above
the identified threshold, to report the presence and amount of
such chemicals to the State emergency response commission.
Title II of H.R. 2279 codifies existing policy and
regulations to ensure that States have a role in response
actions under CERCLA. It allows States to provide input
regarding removal actions and the selection of remedial
actions. The bill also allows States to receive in-kind credit
toward State cost share requirements for providing goods and
services that directly benefit removal and remedial actions.
The legislation also authorizes States to identify a site for
listing on the National Priorities List (NPL) every five years
and ensures that States are able to object to the listing of
sites to the NPL. The legislation also provides that State
environmental covenant laws and other engineering or land use
control laws and regulations are properly considered under
CERCLA.
Title III of H.R. 2279 requires (1) that each department,
agency, and instrumentality of the United States shall be
subject to and comply with CERCLA in the same manner and to the
same extent, both procedurally and substantively, as any
nongovernmental entity, and (2) that State laws concerning
removal and remedial action, including State laws regarding
enforcement, shall apply to removal or remedial action at
facilities owned or operated by a department, agency, or
instrumentality of the United States. Title III explicitly
provides that all Federal facilities, currently or formerly
owned by the United States, are subject to the same substantive
and procedural requirements, including enforcement requirements
and sanctions, as any private entity. The legislation also
provides for the review of the response policies, guidance, and
procedures established by Federal agencies that are operating
pursuant to the Presidential delegation of response authority
under CERCLA.
Legislative History
The Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a
hearing on a discussion draft entitled the ``Reducing Excessive
Deadline Obligations Act of 2013'' on May 17 and May 22, 2013.
The Subcommittee received testimony from Earthjustice, the City
Manager of Garfield, New Jersey, the Environmental Council of
the States, the Assistant Attorney General of Colorado, on
behalf of the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the
Environment, the Government Accountability Office, and the
Congressional Research Service.
On June 5 and 6, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy met in open markup session to consider a Committee
Print entitled ``Reducing Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of
2013'' and forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full
Committee by a voice vote.
On June 6, 2013, H.R. 2279 was introduced by Representative
Cory Gardner (CO-4), and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker. H.R. 2279 was identical
to the Committee Print forwarded by the Subcommittee.
On June 6, 2013, H.R. 2279 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Environment and the Economy.
On June 18 and 19, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2279 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 25 yeas and 18 nays.
On July 30, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2279 to the House (H. Rept. 113-179, Part I), and
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure was granted
an extension for further consideration ending not later than
November 1, 2013.
On November 1, 2013, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure was discharged from further consideration of
H.R. 2279, and the bill was placed on the Union Calendar
(Calendar No. 183).
On January 9, 2014, H.R. 2279 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 455, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 225 yeas and 188
nays (Roll Call No. 10). The rule incorporated H.R. 2226 and
H.R. 2318 as Title II and Title III respectively.
On January 13, 2014, H.R. 2279 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works.
No further action was taken on H.R. 2279.
Federal Facility Accountability Act of 2013
H.R. 2318
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 with respect to the
applicability of the Act to Federal facilities, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2318 requires (1) that each department, agency, and
instrumentality of the United States shall be subject to and
comply with the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) in the same
manner and to the same extent, both procedurally and
substantively, as any nongovernmental entity, and (2) that
State laws concerning removal and remedial action, including
State laws regarding enforcement, shall apply to removal or
remedial action at facilities owned or operated by a
department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States.
H.R. 2318 explicitly provides that all Federal facilities,
currently or formerly owned by the United States, are subject
to all of the same substantive and procedural requirements,
including enforcement requirements and sanctions, as any
private entity. The legislation also provides for the review of
the response policies, guidance, and procedures established by
Federal agencies that are operating pursuant to the
Presidential delegation of response authority under CERCLA.
Legislative History
The Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy held a
hearing on a discussion draft entitled the ``Federal Facility
Accountability Act of 2013'' on May 17 and 22, 2013. The
Subcommittee received testimony from Earthjustice, the City
Manager of Garfield, New Jersey, the Environmental Council of
the States, the Assistant Attorney General of Colorado, on
behalf of the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the
Environment, the Government Accountability Office, and the
Congressional Research Service.
On June 5 and 6, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy met in open markup session to consider a Committee
Print entitled ``Federal Facility Accountability Act of 2013''
and forwarded the bill, without amendment, to the full
Committee by a voice vote.
H.R. 2318 was introduced by Representative Robert E. Latta
(OH-5) on June 11, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker.
The provisions of H.R. 2318 are substantially similar to
the Committee Print entitled ``Federal Facility Accountability
Act of 2013,'' which was forwarded to the full Committee.
On June 18 and 19, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2318 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 26 yeas and 18 nays.
On July 30, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2318 to the House (H. Rept. 113-180, Part I), and
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure was granted
an extension for further consideration ending not later than
November 1, 2013.
On November 1, 2013, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure was discharged from further consideration of
H.R. 2318, and the bill was placed on the Union Calendar
(Calendar No. 184).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2318. Provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 2318 were included in H.R. 2279.
Chemical Safety Improvement Act
S. 1009
To reauthorize and modernize the Toxic Substances Control
Act, and for other purposes.
Summary
S. 1009 would authorize the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to require manufacturers to develop new data and
information on chemical substances and assign either a high or
low priority to that substance for risk assessment purposes.
S. 1009 would require EPA to issue regulations for chemical
substances where an ``unreasonable risk of harm to human health
or the environment will result from exposure'' under its
intended conditions of use. S. 1009 would preempt similar State
and local chemical specific control laws for a chemical
identified as high or low priority.
S. 1009 would evaluate the existing inventory of chemicals
in U.S. commerce since 1976 to allow for delineation between
legacy chemicals and those currently produced and used in the
United States. The bill specifies the types of information
protected as confidential business information, and adds new
parties who may obtain this information.
Legislative History
On May 22, 2013, S. 1009 was introduced by Senator Frank R.
Lautenberg (NJ), and referred to the Committee on Environment
and Public Works.
On July 31, 2013, Committee on Environment and Public Works
held a hearing entitled ``Strengthening Public Health
Protections by Addressing Toxic Chemical Threats'' and reviewed
S. 1009. The Committee received testimony from the Office of
the Attorney General of the State of California, West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection; Washington State
Department of Ecology; Natural Resource Defense Council; a
professor of law from the University of Texas at Austin,
DuPont, a counsel from Squire Sanders, LLP, Asbestos Disease
Awareness Organization, a counsel from Weitz and Luzxenberg, a
principal from Beveridge & Diamond, PC, Environmental Working
Group, Breast Cancer Fund, Dignity Health, a partner from
Alston and Bird, LLP, a clinical professor of epidemiology and
public health from Yale School of Medicine, We Act for
Environmental Justice, Mossville Environmental Action Now, Toy
Industry Association, Inc., and Center for Environmental
Health.
On November 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy held a hearing on S. 1009 and received testimony
from Senator David Vitter (LA), Senator Tom Udall (NM), the
Environmental Protection Agency, the American Chemistry
Council, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Information
Technology Industry Council, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families,
the American Cleaning Institute, and a professor from the
University of Texas School of Law.
No further action was taken on S. 1009.
Chemicals in Commerce Act
DISCUSSION DRAFT
To provide for the safe and efficient flow of chemicals in
interstate and foreign commerce.
Summary
The Chemicals in Commerce Act (CICA) would make several
changes to core sections of Title I of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA). The first draft was published on February
27, 2014, and a second draft was made public on April 22, 2014.
Below is a summary of the major provisions of CICA.
Both drafts of CICA granted new authority to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to require manufacturers
and processors of a chemical substance or mixture to submit
exposure and hazard data and information to the Agency.
Both versions of the CICA required EPA, for risk evaluation
purposes, to designate chemicals already in commerce as either
high priority or low priority based upon hazard and exposure
information. Both versions also changed the regulatory standard
and process required for regulating of chemicals, mixtures, and
articles under TSCA.
The CICA drafts also expanded the reporting requirements
for chemicals in commerce under TSCA section 8 and required EPA
to publicly organize non-confidential information it received
based upon which chemicals were actively in commerce and those
which were no longer being made or processed.
The CICA drafts clarified the types of information to be
protected from public disclosure as confidential, expanded the
circumstances and persons with whom EPA could share this
confidential information, and outlined the process by which
protected information would no longer be treated as such.
Finally, the CICA drafts amended TSCA section 18 related to
pre-emption of State and local laws. The drafts preempted State
and local laws to the extent that they duplicated or were in
conflict with, EPA decisions concerning testing or regulatory
controls.
Legislative History
On March 12, 2014 the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing entitled, Chemicals in Commerce Act
Discussion Draft.'' Witnesses included Dr. Beth Bosley,
President, Boron Specialties, LLC, on behalf of the Society of
Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates; Dr. Carolyn Duran,
Director of Chemical Risk and Compliance, Global Sourcing and
Procurement, Intel Corporation; Ms. Connie DeFord, Director of
Product Sustainability and Compliance, the Dow Chemical
Company; Mr. Roger Harris, President, Producers Chemical on
behalf of the National Chemical Distributors Association; Mr.
James Stem, National Legislative Director-Transportation
Division, Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Union; Ms.
Jennifer Thomas, Director, Federal Government Affairs, Alliance
of Automobile Manufacturers; Mr. Mark Duvall, Principal,
Beveridge and Diamond, PC; Mr. Michael Belliveau, Executive
Director, Environmental Health Strategy Center; Mr. Barry Cik,
Founder, Naturepedic, on behalf of Companies for Safer
Chemicals; Ms. Anna Fendley, MPH, United Steelworkers; and Dr.
Phillip J. Landrigan, Dean for Global Health, Ethel H. Wise
Professor and Chairman, Professor of Pediatrics and Director,
Children's Environmental Health Care Center, Ichann School of
Medicine at Mount Sinai.
On April 29, 2014 the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing on a revised discussion draft of the
Chemicals in Commerce Act dated April 22, 2014. Witnesses
included the Honorable Jim Jones, Assistant Administrator,
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; the Honorable Calvin Dooley,
President and CEO, American Chemistry Council; Dr. Beth Bosley,
President, Boron Specialties, LLC, on behalf of the Society of
Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates; Mr. Mark Greenwood,
Principal, Greenwood Environmental Counsel, PLLC; Dr. Len
Sauers, Vice President, Global Sustainability, the Proctor and
Gamble Company; Mr. Steven Goldberg, Vice President and
Associate General Counsel, Regulatory and Government Affairs,
BASF; Mr. Andy Igrejas, National Campaign Director, Safer
Chemicals, Healthy Families; and the Honorable Michael Moore,
on behalf of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
No further action was taken on the Discussion Draft.
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
The Role of the States in Protecting the Environment Under Current Law
On February 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy held a hearing on the role of State officials in
protecting the environment and public health under several
Federal laws within the Subcommittee's jurisdiction, including
the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. The Subcommittee
received testimony from Arkansas Department of the
Environmental Quality, on behalf of the Environmental Council
of States, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental
Services, on behalf of the Association of State Drinking Water
Administrators, the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, on behalf of the Association of State and Territorial
Solid Waste Management Organizations, the Colorado Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission, on behalf of the Ground Water
Protection Council; the Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality, on behalf of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact
Commission, North Carolina Representative Pricey Harrison, on
behalf of the National Caucus of Environmental Legislators, and
Gaithersburg City Councilman Michael Sesma, on behalf of the
National League of Cities.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Policy and Governance Challenges
On February 28, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy and the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a
joint hearing on Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) decisions
and actions relating to licensing, policy making, and the
Commission's operating procedures. The Subcommittees received
testimony from the NRC Chairman and Commissioners.
The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program--A Progress
Update
On March 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing to update Members on the progress of the
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program in helping
facilities attain each program milestone, and to explain how
its risk assessment process compares to the process set out in
the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Department of Homeland Security,
the Government Accountability Office, Society of Chemical
Manufacturers and Affiliates, the Dow Chemical Company, on
behalf of the American Chemistry Council, and the American Fuel
and Petrochemical Manufacturers.
The FY 2014 EPA Budget
On May 16, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy and the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a joint
hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed
budget for Fiscal Year 2014. The purpose of the hearing was to
evaluate EPA's proposed budget, which affects issues such as
funding for activities related to the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
hazardous materials reporting mechanisms, climate change, air
quality programs, drinking water system compliance, cleanup of
hazardous waste sites within the Superfund account, scientific
research that underpins regulatory decision-making, and
homeland security activities. The Subcommittees received
testimony from EPA's Acting Administrator.
Title I of the Toxic Substances Control Act: Understanding Its History
and Reviewing Its Impact
On June 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing to examine the Toxic Substances Control
Act of 1976 to gain a better understanding of the statute, its
implementation, its impacts on the economy and public health
and safety, and ongoing efforts to mitigate risks posed by
unsafe chemicals. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Government Accountability Office, B&C Consortia Management,
LLC, Boron Specialties, LLC, former Director of the Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Charles M. Auer and Associates, LLC, the Breast Cancer
Fund, and the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Regulation of New Chemicals, Protection of Confidential Business
Information, and Innovation
On July 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing focused on two areas of the Toxic
Substances Control Act: section 5, the regulation of new
chemicals and section 14, the protection of proprietary
business information. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Momentive Performance Materials Holding, LLC, on behalf of the
American Chemistry Council, Procter and Gamble, Semiconductor
Industry Association, Environmental Working Group, and Dr.
Rainer Lohmann of the University of Rhode Island.
Oversight of DOE's Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used
Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste
On July 31, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing to discuss the Department of Energy's
``Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel
and High-Level Radioactive Waste'' issued in January of 2013,
and focused on the Department's new strategy for nuclear waste
storage. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Secretary
of Energy.
Implementing the Nuclear Waste Policy Act Next Steps
On September 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy held a hearing focusing on the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission's (NRC) efforts to implement the August 13, 2013
writ of mandamus issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit to resume NRC's review of the
Department of Energy's (DOE) license application to construct a
repository at Yucca Mountain, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste
Policy Act. The hearing also considered DOE actions to
cooperate with NRC and with the Court's decision. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Chairman of the NRC
and the Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy at DOE.
Regulation of Existing Chemicals and the Role of Pre-Emption under
Sections 6 and 18 of the Toxic Substances Control Act
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy held a hearing on two sections of the Toxic
Substances Control Act: section 6, the Environmental Protection
Agency's authority to regulate the manufacture, processing,
distribution in commerce, use, and disposal of chemical
substances; and section 18, the Federal pre-emption of State
law. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Vermont
Agency for Natural Resources, on behalf of the Environmental
Council of the States, Greenwood Environmental Counsel PLLC,
Latham and Watkins, LLP, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers,
the Environmental Protection Bureau of the Office of the New
York State Attorney General, and the Asbestos Disease Awareness
Organization.
Oversight of NRC Management and the Need for Legislative Reform
On December 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy and Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a joint
hearing on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) management
and operations, including the Commission's activity related to
restarting the Yucca mountain licensing process. The
Subcommittees received testimony from the Chairman and
Commissioners of the NRC.
Testing of Chemicals and Reporting and Retention of Information under
TSCA Sections 4 AND 8
On February 4, 2014, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy held a hearing on two sections of the Toxic
Substances Control Act: section 4, requirements for testing
chemical substances and mixtures; and section 8, reporting and
retention of information. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates,
American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, IPC--Association
Connecting Electronics Industries, Consumer Specialty Products
Association, the Humane Society of the United States, Council
on Environmental Health, American Academy of Pediatrics, and
the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The Fiscal Year 2015 EPA Budget
On April 2, 2014, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy and the Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a joint
hearing to review the Environmental Protection Agency's Fiscal
Year 2015 budget request. The purpose of the hearing was to
evaluate the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed
budget, which affects issues such as funding for activities
related to the Solid Waste Disposal Act, hazardous materials
reporting mechanisms, climate change, air quality programs,
drinking water system compliance, cleanup of hazardous waste
sites within the Superfund account, scientific research that
underpins regulatory decision-making, and homeland security
activities. The Subcommittees received testimony from the
Administrator of the EPA.
Constitutional Considerations: States vs. Federal Environmental Policy
Implementation
On July 11, 2014, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing focused on Congress' Constitutional
authority to set uniform, national standards in certain aspects
of environmental policy and the role of the States in taking
the lead in crafting State-specific environment solutions. The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Jonathan H. Adler,
Case Western University School of Law; Mr. Robert Meltz,
Congressional Research Service; Mr. Richard L. Revesz, New York
University School of Law; and Ms. Rena Steinzor, University of
Maryland School of Law and President, Center for Progressive
Reform.
Modernizing the Business of Environmental Regulation and Protection
On July 23, 2014, the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Economy held a hearing to examine ways States and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are modernizing and
streamlining environmental programs and regulations, and
explored opportunities for increased cooperation. The
Subcommittee received testimony from EPA, Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality, Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection, Arkansas Department of Environmental
Quality, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Natural Resources Defense
Council, and Appalachian Voices.
Cyanotoxins in Drinking Water
On November 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Environment and
the Economy held a hearing to examine the causes of harmful
algal blooms in drinking water and the ways States and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) respond to them. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the U.S. EPA, Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency, American Water Works
Association, and Clean Water Action.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``The Role of the States in Protecting the
Environment Under Current Law.'' (February 15, 2013) Serial
Number 113-7.
Hearing entitled ``The Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Policy and Governance Challenges.'' (February 28, 2013) Serial
Number 113-11.
Hearing entitled ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-Terrorism
Standards (CFATS) Program: A Progress Update.'' (March 14,
2013) Serial Number 113-15.
Hearing entitled ``Discussion Draft of H.R. __, the `Coal
Ash Recycling and Oversight Act of 2013.''' (April 11, 2013)
Serial Number 113-29.
Hearing entitled ``The Fiscal Year 2014 Environmental
Protection Agency Budget.'' (May 16, 2013) Serial Number 113-
42.
Hearing entitled ``Three legislative proposals entitled the
`Federal and State Partnership for Environmental Protection Act
of 2013;' the `Reducing Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of
2013;' and the `Federal Facility Accountability Act of 2013.'''
(May 17 and May 22, 2013) Serial Number 113-43.
Hearing entitled ``Title I of the Toxic Substance Control
Act: Understanding its History and Reviewing its Impact.''
(June 13, 2013) Serial Number 113-54.
Hearing entitled ``Regulation of New Chemicals, Protection
of Confidential Business Information, and Innovation.'' (July
11, 2013) Serial Number 113-68.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of DOE's Strategy for the
Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level
Radioactive Waste.'' (July 31, 2013) Serial Number 113-77.
Hearing entitled ``Implementing the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act--Next Steps.'' (September 10, 2013) Serial Number 113-79.
Hearing entitled ``Regulation of Existing Chemicals and the
Role of Pre-Emption under Sections 6 and 18 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act.'' (September 18, 2013) Serial Number
113-83.
Hearing entitled ``S. 1009, The Chemical Safety Improvement
Act.'' (November 13, 2013) Serial Number 113-92.
Hearing entitled ``Oversight of NRC Management and the Need
for Legislative Reform.'' (December 12, 2013) Serial Number
113-110.
Hearing entitled ``Testing of Chemicals and Reporting and
Retention of Information under TSCA Sections 4 and 8''
(February 4, 2014) Serial Number 113-114.
Hearing entitled ``Chemicals in Commerce Act'' (March 12,
2014) Serial Number 113-125.
Hearing entitled ``The Fiscal Year 2015 EPA Budget'' (April
2, 2014) Serial Number 113-133.
Hearing entitled ``Chemicals in Commerce Act'' (April 29,
2014) Serial Number 113-141.
Hearing entitled ``Constitutional Considerations: States
vs. Federal Environmental Policy Implementation'' (July 11,
2014) Serial Number 113-159.
Hearing entitled ``Modernizing the Business of
Environmental Regulation and Protection'' (July 23, 2014)
Serial Number 113-164.
Hearing entitled ``Cyanotoxins in Drinking Water''
(November 19, 2014) Serial Number 113-181.
Subcommittee on Health
(Ratio 17-13)
JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania,
Chairman
FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey, MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky
ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois
LOIS CAPPS, California MIKE ROGERS, Michigan
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania
JIM MATHESON, Utah MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
GENE GREEN, Texas PHIL GINGREY, Georgia
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina CATHY McMORRIS RODGERS, Washington
JOHN BARROW, Georgia LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey
DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, Virgin Islands BILL CASSIDY, Louisiana
KATHY CASTOR, Florida BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky
JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
(Ex Officio) RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
JOE BARTON, Texas
FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Public health and quarantine; hospital construction;
mental health and research; biomedical programs and health protection
in general, including public and private health insurance; food and
drugs; and, drug abuse.
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-5 (H.R. 307)
To reauthorize certain programs under the Public Health
Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with
respect to public health security and all-hazards preparedness
and response, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 307 amends the Public Health Service Act and Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to facilitate the development of
chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear medical
countermeasures and to bolster the nation's preparedness
infrastructure to better prepare for and respond to public
health emergencies.
Legislative History
H.R. 307 was introduced by Representative Mike J. Rogers
(MI-8) on January 18, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker. On January 18, 2013, H.R. 307 was referred to
the Subcommittee on Health.
On January 22, 2013, H.R. 307 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 395 yeas and 29 nays
(Roll Call No. 24).
On January 23, 2013, H.R. 307 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions. On February 13, 2013, the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ordered H.R. 307 to be
reported to the Senate, with an amendment in the nature of a
substitute, and on February 14, 2013, the Committee of Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions reported H.R. 307 to the Senate,
with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and without a
written report. On February 14, 2013, H.R. 307 was placed on
the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar
No. 14).
On February 27, 2013, H.R. 307 passed the Senate, as
amended, by unanimous consent.
A message on the Senate action was sent to the House on
February 28, 2013.
On March 4, 2013, the Senate amendment to H.R. 307 was
considered in the House under a motion to suspend the Rules,
and the bill was passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 370
yeas and 28 nays (Roll Call No. 56).
H.R. 307 was presented to the President on March 5, 2013,
and the President signed the bill on March 13, 2013 (Public Law
113-5).
Animal Drug and Animal Generic Drug User Fee Reauthorization Act of
2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-14 (S. 622, H.R. 1407, H.R. 1408)
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to
reauthorize user fee programs relating to new animal drugs and
generic new animal drugs.
Summary
S. 622 amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to
extend the authority of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
to collect animal drug user fees, specifically, new animal drug
application fees, supplemental animal drug application fees,
animal drug product fees, animal drug establishment fees, and
animal drug sponsor fees. The bill also extends the authority
of the FDA to collect generic animal drug user fees,
specifically abbreviated application fees for generic new
animal drugs, product fees, and sponsor fees.
Legislative History
On April 9, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Reauthorization of Animal Drug User Fees: ADUFA and
AGDUFA'' to consider discussion drafts entitled ``Animal Drug
User Fee Amendments of 2013'' and ``Animal Generic Drug User
Fee Amendments of 2013.''
H.R. 1407 was introduced by Representative John Shimkus
(IL-15) introduced on April 9, 2013, and referred to Committee
on Energy and Commerce. On April 12, 2013, H.R. 1407 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health. H.R. 1407 was
substantially similar to the discussion draft entitled ``Animal
Drug User Fee Amendments of 2013.''
H.R. 1408 was introduced by Representative Cory Gardner
(CO-4) on April 9, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On April 12, 2013, H.R. 1408 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health. H.R. 1408 was substantially
similar to the discussion draft entitled ``Animal Generic Drug
User Fee Amendments of 2013.''
On May 7, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 1407 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote. The amendment
adopted by the Subcommittee included legislation substantially
similar to H.R. 1408.
On May 14 and 15, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1407, and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On August 2, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1407 to the House (H. Rept. 113-188), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 135).
No further action was taken on either H.R. 1407 or H.R.
1408.
S. 622 was introduced by Senator Tom Harkin (IA) on March
20, 2013. On March 20, 2013, the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions reported S. 622 to the Senate
without a written report, and the bill was placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 31).
On May 8, 2013, S. 622 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
S. 622 was received in the House on May 9, 2013.
On June 3, 2013, S. 622 was considered in the House under a
motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed, without
amendment, by a roll call vote of 390 yeas and 12 nays (Roll
Call No. 185). The provisions of S. 622, as adopted by the
House, were substantially similar to H.R. 1407, as reported to
the House by the Committee on Energy and Commerce, which
included the provisions of H.R. 1408.
On June 6, 2013, S. 622 was presented to the President, and
the President signed the bill on June 13, 2013 (Public Law 113-
14).
School Access to Emergency Epinephrine Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-48 (H.R. 2094)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to increase the
preference given, in awarding certain asthma-related grants, to
certain States (those allowing trained school personnel to
administer epinephrine and meeting other related requirements).
Summary
H.R. 2094 amends the Public Health Service Act with respect
to asthma-related grants for child health services, to give an
additional preference to a State that: (1) maintains an
emergency supply of epinephrine, (2) permits trained personnel
of the school to administer epinephrine, (3) has a plan for
ensuring trained personnel are available to administer
epinephrine during all school hours, and (4) certifies the
adequacy of the State's civil liability protection laws to
protect trained school personnel who may administer epinephrine
to a student reasonably believed to be having an anaphylactic
reaction.
Legislative History
H.R. 2094 was introduced by Representative David P. Roe
(TN-1) on May 22, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce. On May 24, 2013, H.R. 2094 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On July 16 and 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup to consider H.R. 2094 and the bill
was ordered favorably reported to the House, without amendment,
by unanimous consent.
On July 30, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2094 to the House (H. Rept. 113-182), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 130).
On July 30, 2013, H.R. 2094 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On July 31, 2013, H.R. 2094 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
On October 30, 2013, the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions ordered H.R. 2094 favorably reported,
without amendment, and Senator Tom Harkin (IA) reported the
bill without a written report.
On October 30, 2013, H.R. 2094 was placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 229).
H.R. 2094 was considered by the Senate on October 31, 2013,
and the bill was passed, without amendment, by unanimous
consent.
On November 6, 2013, H.R. 2094 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 13,
2013 (Public Law 113-48).
HIV Organ Policy Equity Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-51 (S. 330, H.R. 698)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to establish
safeguards and standards of quality for research and
transplantation of organs infected with human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV).
Summary
H.R. 698 amends the Public Health Service Act to lift the
ban on the transplantation of organs infected with the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and to allow the Organ Procurement
and Transplantation Network to adopt and use standards of
quality with respect to organs infected with HIV, provided that
any such standards ensure that organs infected with HIV may be
transplanted only into individuals who are infected with such
virus before receiving such organ and following research on
such transplants.
Legislative History
H.R. 698 was introduced by Representative Lois Capps (CA-
24) on February 14, 2013, and was referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 15, 2013, H.R. 698 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On July 16 and 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 698 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On July 30, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 698 to the House (H. Report 113-181, Part I), the
Committee on the Judiciary was discharged from further
consideration of H.R. 698, and the bill was placed on the Union
Calendar (Calendar No. 129).
No further action was taken on H.R. 698.
S. 330 was introduced by Senator Barbara Boxer (CA) on
February 14, 2013. On February, 14, 2013, the bill was read
twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions. On March 20, 2013, the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ordered S. 330 favorably
reported, as amended, to the Senate. On May 21, 2013, Senator
Tom Harkin (IA) reported S. 330, as amended, to the Senate
without a written report, and the bill was placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 75).
On June 17, 2013, S. 330 passed the Senate, as amended, by
unanimous consent.
S. 330 was received in the House on June 18, 2013, and
referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in
addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker. On June 21, 2013, the
Committee on Energy and Commerce referred S. 330 to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On November 12, 2013, S. 330 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote. The provisions of S. 330
were substantially similar to H.R. 698, as reported to the
House by the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
On November 14, 2013, S. 330 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 21,
2013 (Public Law 113-51).
Safeguarding America's Pharmaceuticals Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-54 (H.R. 3204, H.R. 1919, H.R. 3089)
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with
respect to the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain, and
for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3204 amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
with respect to the regulation of compounding drugs and exempts
compounded drugs from new drug requirements, labeling
requirements, and track and trace requirements if the drug is
compounded by or under the direct supervision of a licensed
pharmacist in a registered outsourcing facility and meets
applicable requirements. The bill also establishes annual
registration requirements for any outsourcing facility and
requires a facility to report biannually to the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human Services on what drugs are
compounded in the facility.
H.R. 3204 also establishes requirements to facilitate the
tracing of prescription drug products through the
pharmaceutical supply distribution chain and requires the
Secretary to establish standards for the exchange of
transaction documentation, which shall include transaction
information, transaction history, and transaction statements.
Legislative History
On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Securing Our Nation's Prescription Drug
Supply Chain'' and considered a Committee Print entitled ``To
amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to
the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain, and for other
purposes.''
On May 7, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider the Committee Print and forwarded
the bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
H.R. 1919 was introduced by Representative Robert E. Latta
(OH-5) on May 9, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce. On May 10, 2013, H.R. 1919 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health. H.R. 1919, as introduced, was
substantially similar to the Committee Print forwarded to the
full Committee.
On May 14 and 15, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1919 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On June 3, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1919 to the House, as amended (H. Rept. 113-93),
and the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No.
65).
On June 3, 2013, H.R. 1919 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 4, 2013, H.R. 1919 was received in the Senate, read
twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1919.
H.R. 3204 was introduced by Representative Fred Upton (MI-
6) on September 27, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. H.R. 3204 included provisions
substantially similar to H.R. 1919, as passed the House, and
H.R. 3089, which was introduced by Representative H. Morgan
Griffith on September 12, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce.
On September 28, 2013, H.R. 3204 was considered in the
House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a voice vote.
On September 30, 2013, H.R. 3204 was received in the
Senate.
On November 4, 2013, H.R. 3204 was read the first time and
placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First
Time. On November 5, 2013, H.R. 3204 was read the second time
and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders
(Calendar No. 236).
H.R. 3204 was considered by the Senate on November 18,
2013, and the bill was passed, without amendment, by a voice
vote.
On November 21, 2013, H.R. 3204 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 27,
2013 (Public Law 113-54).
PREEMIE Reauthorization Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-55 (S. 252, H.R. 541, S. 1561, H.R. 225)
To reduce preterm labor and delivery and the risk of
pregnancy-related deaths and complications due to pregnancy,
and to reduce infant mortality caused by prematurity, and for
other purposes.
Summary
Title I of S. 252 amends the Prematurity Research Expansion
and Education for Mothers who Deliver Infants Early Act to
revise and reauthorize requirements for research on prematurity
and preterm births.
Title I also authorizes the Director of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (1) to conduct epidemiological
studies on the clinical, biological, social, environmental,
genetic, and behavioral factors related to prematurity, as
appropriate; (2) to conduct activities to improve national data
to facilitate tracking preterm births; and (3) to continue
efforts to prevent preterm birth through the identification of
opportunities for prevention and the assessment of their
impact.
In addition, Title I requires the Secretary to give
preference in awarding grants to an eligible entity that
proposes to use the grant funds to develop plans for, or to
establish, telehealth networks that provide prenatal care for
high-risk pregnancies.
Title I revises and reauthorizes the authority of the
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to
conduct demonstration projects related to preterm births.
Title II amends the Public Health Service Act to authorize
the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to
establish a National Pediatric Research Network.
Title II also authorizes NIH to award funding to public or
private nonprofit entities to support pediatric research
consortia for basic, clinical, behavioral, or translational
research and to train researchers in pediatric research
techniques.
Title III amends the Public Health Service Act to authorize
funding for the care of NIH chimpanzees.
Legislative History
S. 252 was introduced by Senator Lamar Alexander (TN) on
February 7, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions. On February 14, 2013, Senator
Tom Harkin (IA) reported S. 252 without a written report, and
the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 13).
On September 25, 2013, S. 252 passed the Senate, as
amended, by a voice vote.
On September 26, 2013, S. 252 was received in the House and
referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and on
September 27, 2013, the bill was referred to the Subcommittee
on Health.
On November 12, 2013, S. 252 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
Provisions substantially similar to S. 1561 and H.R. 225
were incorporated into S. 252, as amended by the House.
On November 13, 2013, S. 252, as amended by the House, was
received in the Senate.
On November 14, 2013, the Senate agreed to the House
amendments to S. 252 by unanimous consent.
On November 21, 2013, S. 252 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 27,
2013 (Public Law 113-55).
Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-67 (DIVISION B OF H.J. RES. 59)
DIVISION B--MEDICARE AND OTHER HEALTH PROVISIONS
Summary
Division B of H.J. Res. 59 prevents the 20.1 percent cut in
reimbursement to doctors who treat Medicare patients on January
1, 2014, and replaces it with a 0.5 percent increase until
April 1, 2014. Division B of H.J. Res. 59 also includes other
health extenders that Congress traditionally has passed.
Legislative History
H.J. Res. 59 was introduced by Representative Harold Rogers
(KY-5) on September 10, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Appropriations, and Committee on the Budget, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On September 20, 2013, H.J. Res. 59 was considered in the
House pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 352, and the joint
resolution was passed by a roll call vote of 230 yeas and 189
nays (Roll Call No. 478).
On September 23, 2013, H.J. Res. 59 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar
under General Orders (Calendar No. 195).
On September 26 and 27, 2013, H.J. Res. 59 was considered
in the Senate, and the joint resolution was passed, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 54 yeas and 44 nays (Recorded Vote No.
209).
On September 27, 2013, a message on Senate action was sent
to the House.
On September 28 and 29, 2013, H.J. Res. 59, as amended by
the Senate, was considered in the House pursuant to the
provisions of H.Res. 366, and the joint resolution was passed,
with amendment 1, by a roll call vote of 248 yeas and 174 nays
(Roll Call No. 497), and with amendment 2, by a vote of 231
yeas and 192 nays (Roll Call No. 498).
On September 29, 2013, a message on House action was
received in the Senate.
On September 30, 2013, H.J. Res. 59 was laid before the
Senate by unanimous consent, and a motion to table the House
amendments to Senate amendment was agreed to by a roll call
vote of 54 yeas and 46 nays (Record Vote No. 210).
On September 30, 2013, a message on Senate action was sent
to the House.
On September 30, 2013, H.J. Res. 59, as amended by the
Senate on September 27, 2013, was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 367, and the joint
resolution, as amended by the Senate, was passed with an
amendment by the House, by a roll call vote of 228 yeas and 201
nays (Roll Call No. 504).
On September 30, 2013, a message on House action was
received in the Senate.
On September 30, 2013, a motion to table to the House
amendment to H.J. Res. 59, as amended by the Senate on
September 27, 2013, was passed by a roll call vote of 54 yeas
and 46 nays (Record Vote No. 211).
On September 30, 2013, a message on Senate action was sent
to the House.
Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 368, on October 1,
2013, the House agreed to take H.J. Res. 59 from the Speaker's
table, with the House amendment to the Senate amendment H.J.
Res. 59, insisted on the House amendment, and requested a
conference with the Senate thereon, and the Speaker appointed
conferees for consideration of the Senate amendment, the House
amendment, and modifications committed to conference.
On October 1, 2013, a message on House action was received
in the Senate, and a motion to table the message from the House
was passed by the Senate by a roll call vote of 54 yeas and 46
nays (Record Vote No. 212).
On October 1, 2013, a message on Senate action was sent to
the House.
On December 12, 2013, H.J. Res. 59, as amended by the
Senate on September 27, 2013, was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 438, and the joint
resolution, as amended by the Senate, was passed, with an
amendment by the House, by a roll call vote of 332 yeas and 94
nays (Roll Call No. 640).
On December 12, 2013, a message on House action was
received in the Senate.
On December 18, 2013, H.J. Res. 59, as amended by the
Senate and with a House amendment, was considered in the
Senate, and the Senate agreed to the House amendment to the
Senate amendment by a roll call vote of 64 yeas and 36 nays
(Recorded Vote No. 281).
On December 19, 2013, H.J. Res. 59, as amended, was
presented to the President, and the President signed the
resolution on December 26, 2013 (Public Law 113-67).
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Land Transfer Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-68 (H.R. 623, S. 235)
To provide for the conveyance of certain property located
in Anchorage, Alaska, from the United States to the Alaska
Native Tribal Health Consortium.
Summary
H.R. 623 directs the Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services to convey by warranty deed to the Alaska
Native Tribal Health Consortium specified property in
Anchorage, Alaska, for use in connection with health and
related programs.
Legislative History
H.R. 623 was introduced by Representative Don Young (AK-AL)
on February 12, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Natural
Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 15, 2013, H.R. 623 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On July 31, 2013, the Committee on Natural Resources met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 623 and ordered the bill
favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a voice vote.
On October 10, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
and the Committee on Natural Resources exchanged letters
acknowledging the Committee on Energy and Commerce's
jurisdictional interest in the bill.
On October 22, 2013, the Committee on Natural Resources
reported H.R. 623 to the House, as amended (H. Rept. 113-248,
Part I), the Committee on Energy and Commerce was discharged
from further consideration of the bill, and the bill was placed
on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 176).
On October 29, 2013, H.R. 623 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On October 30, 2014, H.R. 623 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
On December 30, 2014, H.R. 623 was discharged by the
Committee on Indian Affairs by unanimous consent and was passed
by the Senate, without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 23, 2013, H.R. 623 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 26,
2013 (Public Law 113-68).
Poison Center Network Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-77 (H.R. 3527)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the
poison center national toll-free number, national media
campaign, and grant program, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3527 reauthorizes the national toll-free number,
national media campaign, and grant program of the poison
control centers.
Legislative History
H.R. 3527 was introduced by Representative Lee Terry (NE-2)
on November 18, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 3527.
On December 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 3527 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, without amendment, by a voice vote.
On December 10 and 11, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3527 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On January 7, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3527 to the House (H. Rept. 113-321), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 239).
On January 8, 2014, H.R. 3527 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a roll call vote of 388 yeas and 18 nays (Roll
Call No. 3).
On January 9, 2014, H.R. 3527 was received in the Senate
and read twice. On January 14, 2014, H.R. 3527 passed the
Senate, without amendment, by unanimous consent, and a message
on Senate action was sent to the House on January 15, 2014.
On January 15, 2014, H.R. 3527 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on January 24,
2014 (Public Law 113-77).
Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-93 (H.R. 4302, H.R. 846, H.R. 2995, H.R. 1263)
To amend the Social Security Act to extend Medicare
payments to physicians and other provisions of the Medicare and
Medicaid programs, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4302 amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
(1) extend the physician payment update through the 2014
calendar year, (2) freeze the update to the single conversion
factor at 0.00 percent for January 1, 2015, through March 31,
2015, and (3) require that the conversion factor after April 1,
2015, be computed as if such freeze had never applied.
H.R. 4302 also amends Title XIX to extend the qualifying
individual transitional medical assistance programs, and to
extend the express lane program eligibility under both Medicaid
and Title XXI through September 30, 2015.
Legislative History
H.R. 4302 was introduced by Representative Joseph R. Pitts
(PA-16) on March 26, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, in addition to the Committee on Ways and
Means, and the Committee on Budget, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker.
On March 27, 2014, H.R. 4302 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On March 27, 2014, H.R. 4302 was received in the Senate and
read twice.
On March 31, 2014, the measure was laid before the Senate
by unanimous consent and passed, without amendment, by a roll
call vote of 64 yeas and 35 nays (Record Vote No. 93).
On April 1, 2014, a message on Senate action was sent to
the House, H.R. 4302 was presented to the President, and the
President signed the bill (Public Law 113-93).
Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-94 (H.R. 2019)
To eliminate taxpayer financing of political party
conventions and reprogram savings to provide for a 10-year
pediatric research initiative through the Common Fund
administered by the National Institutes of Health, and for
other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2019 terminates funding from the Presidential Election
Campaign Fund for political party conventions and authorizes
such funding to be spent on pediatric biomedical research
activities through the Common Fund at the National Institutes
of Health. The bill directs that additional spending on
pediatric research be drawn from the new Pediatric Research
Initiative Fund, but requires an advance appropriations measure
for this new spending to occur.
Legislative History
H.R. 2019 was introduced by Representative Gregg Harper
(MS-3) on May 16, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on House
Administration and Ways and Means, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker. On May 17, 2013, H.R.
2019 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On December 11, 2013, H.R. 2019 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a roll call vote of 295 yeas and 103 nays (Roll
Call No. 632).
On December 12, 2013, H.R. 2019 was received in the Senate,
and on December 20, 2013, H.R. 2019 was read the first time and
placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First
Time.
On January 6, 2014, H.R. 2019 was read the second time and
placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders
(Calendar No. 289).
On March 11, 2014, H.R. 2019 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent, and a message on Senate action
was sent to the House.
On March 25, 2014, H.R. 2019 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on April 3, 2014
(Public Law 113-94).
Children's Hospital GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-98 (S. 1557, H.R. 297)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize
support for graduate medical education programs in children's
hospitals.
Summary
H.R. 297 amends the Public Health Service Act to
reauthorize appropriations for payments to children's hospitals
for expenses associated with operating approved graduate
medical residency training programs.
Legislative History
H.R. 297 was introduced by Representative Joseph R. Pitts
(PA-16) on January 15, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On January 18, 2013, H.R. 297 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On January 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 297 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by
unanimous consent.
On February 4, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 297 to the House (H. Rept. 113-3), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 1).
On February 4, 2013, H.R. 297 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 352 yeas and 50 nays
(Roll Call No. 32).
On February 7, 2013, H.R. 297 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 297.
S. 1557 was introduced by Senator Robert P. Casey, Jr. (PA)
on September 27, 2014. On October 30, 2013, the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions reported S. 1557 to the
Senate without a written report, and the bill was placed on the
Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No.
227).
On November 12, 2013, S. 1557 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
S. 1557 was received in the House on November 13, 2013, and
referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
On April 1, 2014, S. 1557 was considered in the House under
a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
The provisions of S. 1557, as passed by the Senate and the
House, were substantially similar to H.R. 297, as passed the
House on February 4, 2013.
On April 2, 2014, S. 1557 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on April 7, 2014 (Public Law
113-98).
Veterinary Medicine Mobility Act of 2013
PUBLIC LAW 113-143 (H.R. 1528)
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow a
veterinarian to transport and dispense controlled substances in
the usual course of veterinary practice outside of the
registered location.
Summary
H.R. 1528 amends the Controlled Substances Act to allow
veterinarians registered to manufacture or distribute
controlled substances to transport and dispense controlled
substances in the usual course of veterinary practice at a site
other than the veterinarian's principal place of business or
professional practice. The transporting and dispensing site
must be located in a State where the veterinarian is licensed
to practice and is not a principal place of business or
professional practice.
Legislative History
H.R. 1528 was introduced by Representative Kurt Schrader
(OR-5) on April 12, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On April 12, 2013, H.R. 297 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 1528 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by voice vote.
On April 3, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 1528 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On May 20, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1528 to the House (H. Rept. 113-457, Part I), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 338).
On July 8, 2014, H.R. 1528 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 9, 2014, H.R. 1528 was received in the Senate, read
twice, and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 458).
On July 16, 2014, H.R. 1528 was passed by the Senate,
without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On July 17, 2014, a message on Senate action was sent to
the House.
On July 23, 2014, H.R. 1528 was presented to the President,
and the President signed the bill on August 1, 2014 (Public Law
113-143).
Improving Trauma Care Act of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-152 (H.R. 3548, S. 2406)
To amend Title XII of the Public Health Service Act to
expand the definition of trauma to include thermal, electrical,
chemical, radioactive, and other extrinsic agents
Summary
H.R. 3548 amends the Public Health Service Act to authorize
burn centers to receive trauma center grants and trauma
research programs.
Legislative History
H.R. 3548 was introduced by Representative Bill Johnson
(OH-6) on November 20, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On November 22, 2013, H.R. 3548 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 3548 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On April 3, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 3548 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On May 20, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3548 to the House (H. Rept. 113-458), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 339).
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 3548 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 3548 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
On July 31, 2014, the Committee on Health Education, Labor,
and Pensions discharged H.R. 3548 by unanimous consent, and the
bill passed the Senate, without amendment, by unanimous
consent.
On August 1, 2014, a message on Senate action was sent to
the House.
On August 4, 2014, H.R. 3548 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on August 8, 2014
(Public Law 113-152).
Autism Cares Act of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-157 (H.R. 4631, S. 2449)
To reauthorize certain provisions of the Public Health
Service Act relating to autism, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4631 requires the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services to designate an official to oversee
national autism spectrum disorder research, services, and
support activities, taking into account the strategic plan
developed by the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee.
Legislative History
H.R. 4631 was introduced by Representative Christopher H.
Smith (NJ-4) on May 9, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On May 16, 2014, H.R. 4631 was referred to
the Subcommittee on Health.
On May 28, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4631 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 10, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 4631 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a voice
vote.
On June 23, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4631 to the House (H. Rept. 113-490), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 365).
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 4631 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 4631 was received in the Senate and
read twice.
On July 31, 2014, H.R. 4631 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent, and a message on Senate action
was sent to the House on August 1, 2014.
On August 4, 2014, H.R. 4631 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on August 8, 2014
(Public Law 113-157).
Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Community Assistance, Research and
Education Amendments of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-166 (H.R. 594, S. 315)
To amend the Public Health Service Act relating to Federal
research on muscular dystrophy, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 594 amends the Public Health Service Act to revise the
muscular dystrophy research program of the National Institutes
of Health and expands the forms of muscular dystrophy included
within the program.
Legislative History
H.R. 594 was introduced by Representative Michael C.
Burgess (TX-26) on February 8, 2013, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce. On February 8, 2013, the bill
was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 594 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 594 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On July 24, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 594 to the House (H. Rept. 113-556), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 416).
On July 28, 2014, H.R. 594 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 29, 2014, H.R. 594 was received in the Senate.
On August 1, 2014, H.R. 594 was read twice and placed on
the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar
No. 529).
On September 18, 2014, H.R. 594 passed the Senate, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On September 23, 2014, H.R. 594 was presented to the
President, and on September 26, 2014, the President signed the
bill (Public Law 113-166).
Emergency Medical Services for Children Reauthorization Act of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-180 (S. 2154, H.R. 4290)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the
Emergency Medical Services for Children Program.
Summary
H.R. 4290 amends the Public Health Service Act to
reauthorize the Emergency Medical Services for Children Program
through Fiscal Year 2019.
Legislative History
H.R. 4290 was introduced by Representative Jim Matheson
(UT-4) on March 25, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On March 28, 2014, H.R. 4290 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4290 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4290 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On July 24, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4290 to the House (H. Rept. 113-559), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 419).
On September 9, 2014, H.R. 4290 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 10, 2014, H.R. 4290 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and placed on the Senate Legislative
Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 558).
No further action was taken on H.R. 4290. S. 2154 was
introduced by Senator Robert P. Casey, Jr. (PA) on March 25,
2014, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
Senator Tom Harkin (IA) reported S. 2154 to the Senate
without a written report, and the bill was placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 480).
On September 10, 2014, S. 2154 was considered by the
Senate, and the bill was passed, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On September 10, 2014, S. 2154 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a roll call vote of 410 yeas and 4 nays
(Roll Call No. 500).
S. 2154 was presented to the President on September 18,
2014, and the President signed the bill on September 26, 2014
(Public Law 113-180).
Sunscreen Innovation Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-195 (S. 2141, H.R. 4250)
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to
provide an alternative process for review of safety and
effectiveness of nonprescription sunscreen active ingredients
and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4250 amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
to establish a process for review and approval of over-the-
counter (OTC) sunscreen active ingredients and allows any
person to request that the Secretary of Department of Health
and Human Services to determine whether an OTC sunscreen active
ingredient or combination of ingredients is safe and effective.
Legislative History
H.R. 4250 was introduced by Representative Ed Whitfield
(KY-1) on March 13, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On March 14, 2014, H.R. 4250 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On April 7, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Improving Predictability and Transparency in DEA and
FDA Regulation'' and reviewed H.R. 4250.
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4250 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4250 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On July 24, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4250 to the House (H. Rept. 113-558), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 418).
On July 28, 2014, H.R. 4250 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 29, 2014, H.R. 4250 was received in the Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4250.
S. 2141 was introduced by Senator Jack Reed (RI) on March
13, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions. On September 17, 2014, the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions reported S. 2141 to the
Senate, as amended, without a written report, and the bill was
placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders
(Calendar No. 568).
On September 17, 2014, S. 2141 passed the Senate, as
amended, by unanimous consent.
S. 2141 was received in the House on September 18, 2014.
On November 13, 2014, S. 2141 was considered in the House
by unanimous consent, and the bill was passed, without
amendment, without objection.
On November 19, 2014, S. 2141 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 26,
2014 (Public Law 113-195).
Traumatic Brain Injury Reauthorization Act of 2014
PUBLIC LAW 113-196 (S. 2539, H.R. 1098)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize
certain programs relating to traumatic brain injury and to
trauma research
Summary
H.R. 1098 reauthorizes Department of Health and Human
Services' programs related to traumatic brain injury (TBI),
including surveillance activities at the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and grants for services and supports for
people experiencing a TBI and their families (including
protection and advocacy services).
Legislative History
H.R. 1098 was introduced by Representative Bill Pascrell,
Jr. (NJ-9) on March 12, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On March 15, 2013, H.R. 1098 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 1098.
On December 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 1098 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On December 10 and 11, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 1098 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On May 20, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1098 to the House (H. Rept. 113-456), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 337).
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 1098 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 1098 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1098.
S. 2539 was introduced by Senator Orrin G. Hatch (UT) on
June 26, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions. On July 23, 2014, the Committee
reported S. 2539 to the Senate, as amended, without a written
report, and the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative
Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 483).
On September 16, 2014, S. 2539 passed the Senate, as
amended, by unanimous consent.
S. 2539 was received in the House on September 17, 2014.
On November 13, 2014, S. 2539 was considered in the House
by unanimous consent, and the bill was passed, without
amendment, without objection.
On November 19, 2014, S. 2539 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on November 26,
2014 (Public Law 113-196).
To Provide for the Extension of the Enforcement Instruction on
Supervision Requirements for Outpatient Therapeutic Services in
Critical Access and Small Rural Hospitals Through 2014
public law 113-__ (h.r. 4067, s. 1954)
To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction
on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services
in critical access and small rural hospitals through 2014.
Summary
H.R. 4067 requires the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services to continue to instruct Medicare
contractors not to enforce requirements for direct physician
supervision of outpatient therapeutic services in critical
access and small rural hospitals through 2014.
Legislative History
H.R. 4067 was introduced by Representative Lynn Jenkins
(KS-2) on February 18, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways
and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 21, 2014, H.R. 4067 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4067 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a roll call of 31 yeas and 11 nays.
On September 9, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4067 to the House (H. Rept. 113-582, Part I), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 431).
H.R. 4067 was considered in the House under a motion to
suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed, without amendment,
by a voice vote.
On September 10, 2014, H.R. 4067 was received in the Senate
and read twice.
On November 20, 2014, the Senate passed H.R. 4067, without
amendment, by unanimous consent.
On November 24, 2014, H.R. 4067 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December __,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Sudden Unexpected Death Data Enhancement and Awareness Act
public law 113-__ (h.r. 669)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to improve the
health of children and help better understand and enhance
awareness about unexpected sudden death in early life.
Summary
H.R. 669 amends the Public Health Service Act to require
the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services,
acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, to award grants and provide technical
assistance on matters related to sudden unexpected infant
death, sudden unexplained death in childhood, and stillbirth.
Legislative History
H.R. 669 was introduced by Representative Frank Pallone,
Jr. (NJ-6) on February 13, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce. On February 15, 2013, H.R. 669 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 669.
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 669 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 669 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On July 24, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 669 to the House (H. Rept. 113-557), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 417).
On September 9, 2014, H.R. 669 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 10, 2014, H.R. 669 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
On November 19, 2014, the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions ordered H.R. 669 favorably reported,
without amendment.
On November 20, 2014, H.R. 669 was considerate in the
Senate and passed, as amended, by unanimous consent.
On December 3, 2014, H.R. 669 was considered in the House,
and the bill was passed, as amended by the Senate, by unanimous
consent.
On December 8, 2014, H.R. 669 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act
PUBLIC LAW 113-233 (S. 2917)
To expand the program of priority review to encourage
treatments for tropical diseases.
Summary
S. 2917 amends the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by adding
``Filoviruses,'' a family of viruses that includes Ebola and
Marburg viruses, to the definition of tropical diseases. In
addition, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) would be authorized to add additional diseases
to the definition by order, rather than through a rulemaking as
required under current law.
The legislation provides that there is no limit on the
number of times a priority review voucher can be transferred
and reduces the deadline for a sponsor of a human drug
application to notify the Secretary of HHS of an intent to
submit the human drug application from 365 days to 90 days.
Legislative History
S. 2917 was introduced Senator Tom Harkin (IA) on November
12, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
On November 19, 2014, the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions met in open markup session to consider S.
2917 and ordered the bill favorably reported to the Senate,
without amendment. Senator Harkin reported S. 2917 to the
Senate without a written report, and the bill was place on the
Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No.
602).
On December 2, 2014, S. 2917 was considered in the Senate,
and the bill was passed, without amendment, by unanimous
consent.
On December 3, 2014, S. 2917 was considered in the House,
and the bill was passed, without amendment, by unanimous
consent.
On December 10, 2014, S. 2917 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 16,
2014 (Public Law 113-233).
Newborn Screening Saves Lives Reauthorization Act of 2013
public law 113-__ (h.r. 1281)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize
programs under part A of Title XI of such Act.
Summary
H.R. 1281 extends and revises a grant program for
screening, counseling, and other services related to heritable
disorders and expands eligible grantees to include health
professional organizations and early childhood health systems.
H.R. 1281 also extends a grant program to evaluate the
effectiveness of screening, counseling, or health care services
in reducing the morbidity and mortality caused by heritable
disorders in newborns and children.
Finally, H.R. 1281 reauthorizes the Advisory Committee on
Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children; a clearinghouse
of newborn screening information; laboratory quality standards;
an Interagency Coordinating Committee; a national contingency
plan for newborn screening activities in the event of a public
health emergency; and a National Institutes of Health research
program.
Legislative History
H.R. 1281 was introduced by Representative Lucille Roybal-
Allard (CA-40) on March 20, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce. On March 22, 2013, H.R. 1281 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 1281.
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 1282 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On April 3, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 1281 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On June 19, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1281 to the House (H. Rept. 113-478), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 354).
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 1281 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 1281 was received in the Senate.
On December 8, 2014, H.R. 1281 was laid before the Senate
and passed, as amended, by unanimous consent.
On December 10, 2014, H.R. 1281 was considered in the
House, and the bill was passed, as amended by the Senate, by
unanimous consent.
On December 12, 2014, H.R. 1281 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2014
public law 113-__ (h.r. 4771)
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to more effectively
regulate anabolic steroids.
Summary
H.R. 4771 amends the Controlled Substance Act to add
specified substances to the list of those included within the
definition of ``anabolic steroid.''
H.R. 4771 provides that a drug or hormonal substance (other
than estrogens, progestins, corticosteroids, and
dehydroepiandrosterone) that is not listed and that is derived
from or has a chemical structure substantially similar to an
anabolic steroid that is listed, shall be considered to be an
anabolic steroid for purposes of such Act if it meets a
specified condition.
Legislative History
H.R. 4771 was introduced by Representative Joseph R. Pitts
(PA-16) on May 29, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On May 30, 2014, H.R. 4771 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4771 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 14 and 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4771 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On September 15, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4771 to the House (H. Rept. 113-587, Part I), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 434).
On September 15, 2014, H.R. 4771 was considered in the
House under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 16, 2014, H.R. 4771 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary.
On December 11, 2014, H.R. 4771 was discharged from the
Committee on the Judiciary, and the Senate passed the bill,
without amendment, by unanimous consent.
On December 13, 2014, H.R. 4771 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Early Act Reauthorization of 2014
public law 113-__ (h.r. 5185)
To reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education
and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.
Summary
H.R. 5185 amends the Public Health Service Act to
reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and
Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 through fiscal
year 2019, and the bill directs the Comptroller General to
report to Congress on the activities supported by such Act.
Legislative History
H.R. 5185 was introduced by Representative Debbie Wasserman
Schultz, (FL-23) on July 24, 2014, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce. On July 25, 2014, H.R. 5185
was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
December 9, 2014, H.R. 5185 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On December 10, 2014, H.R. 5185 was received in the Senate
and read twice. On December 15, 2014, H.R. 5185 was considered
in the Senate, and the bill was passed, without amendment, by
unanimous consent.
On December 16, 2014, H.R. 5185 was presented to the
President, and the President signed the bill on December 18,
2014 (Public Law 113-__).
Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of 2013
public law 113-__ (h.r. 647, h.r. 5771)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for
the tax treatment of ABLE accounts established under State
programs for the care of family members with disabilities, and
for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 647 amends the Internal Revenue Code to establish tax-
exempt ABLE accounts to assist an individual with a disability
in building an account to pay for qualified disability
expenses.
Legislative History
H.R. 647 was introduced by Representative Ander Crenshaw
(AL-4) on February 13, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 15, 2013, H.R. 647 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On July 31, 2014, the Committee on Ways and Means met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 647 and ordered the bill
favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a voice vote.
On November 10, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
and the Committee on Ways and Means exchanged letters
acknowledging the Committee on Energy and Commerce's
jurisdictional interest in the bill.
On November 12, 2014, the Committee on Ways and Means
reported H.R. 647 to the House, as amended (H. Rept. 113-614,
Part I), the Committee on Energy and Commerce was discharged
from further consideration of the bill, and the bill was placed
on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 456).
On December 3, 2014, H.R. 647 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 766, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 404 yeas and 17 nays
(Roll Call No. 545).
No further action was taken on H.R. 647.
Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 647, in the
engrossment of H.R. 5771, which passed the House by a roll call
vote of 378 yeas and 46 nays (Roll Call No. 543) on December 3,
2014, the Clerk of the House was directed to add the text of
H.R. 647, as passed by the House, as new matter at the end of
H.R. 5771; conform the title of H.R. 5771 to reflect the
addition of H.R. 647, as passed by the House, to the
engrossment; assign appropriate designations to provisions
within the engrossment; and conform cross-references and
provisions for short titles within the engrossment.
On December 8, 2014, H.R. 5771 was received in the Senate,
read the first time, and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar
under Read the First Time. On December 9, 2014, H.R. 5771 was
read the second time and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar
under General Orders (Calendar No. 627).
On December 16, 2014, H.R. 5771 was laid before the Senate
by unanimous consent and passed the Senate, without amendment,
by a roll call vote of 76 yeas and 16 nays (Roll Call No. 364).
H.R. 5771 was presented to the President on December 19,
2014, and the President signed the bill on December 19, 2014
(Public Law 113-__).
No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure
Act of 2014
H.R. 7
To prohibit taxpayer funded abortions.
Summary
H.R. 7 bars the expenditure of Federal funds for any
abortion or abortion coverage.
Legislative History
H.R. 7 was introduced by Representative Christopher H.
Smith (NJ-4) on May 14, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary and the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. On May 17,
2013, H.R. 7 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On January 28, 2014, H.R. 7 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 465, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 227 yeas, 188 nays,
1 present (Roll Call No. 30).
On January 29, 2014, H.R. 7 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Finance.
No further action was taken on H.R. 7.
To Repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Health
Care-related Provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation
Act of 2010
H.R. 45
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.
Summary
H.R. 45 repeals the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act and the health care provisions of the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.
Legislative History
H.R. 45 was introduced by Representative Michele Bachmann
(MN-6) on January 3, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Education and the Workforce, the Committee on Ways and Means,
the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Natural
Resources, the Committee on Rules, the Committee on House
Administration, the Committee on Appropriations, and the
Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker. On January 4, 2013, H.R. 45 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On May 16, 2013, H.R. 45 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 215, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 229 yeas and 195
nays (Roll Call No. 154).
On May 20, 2013, H.R. 45 was received in the Senate. On May
21, 2013, H.R. 45 was read the first time and placed on Senate
Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time, and on May 22,
2013, H.R. 45 was read the second time and placed on Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 78).
No further action was taken on H.R. 45.
National Pediatric Research Network Act of 2013
H.R. 225
To amend Title IV of the Public Health Service Act to
provide for a National Pediatric Research Network, including
with respect to pediatric rare diseases or conditions.
Summary
H.R. 225 amends the Public Health Service Act to authorize
the Director of the National Institutes of the Health to
provide for the establishment of a National Pediatric Research
Network and to award funding to public or private nonprofit
entities that form pediatric research consortia.
Legislative History
H.R. 225 was introduced by Representative Lois Capps (CA-
24) on January 14, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On January 18, 2013, H.R. 225 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On January 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 225 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by
unanimous consent.
On February 4, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 225 to the House (H. Rept. 113-4), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 2).
On February 4, 2013, H.R. 225 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend of the Rules, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of 375 yeas and
27 nays (Roll Call No. 31).
On February 7, 2013, H.R. 225 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 225. See S. 252 for
further action related to the provisions of H.R. 225.
Veteran Emergency Medical Technician Support Act of 2013
H.R. 235
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide grants to
States to streamline State requirements and procedures for
veterans with military emergency training to become civilians
emergency medical technicians.
Summary
H.R. 235 amends the Public Health Service Act to direct the
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to
establish a demonstration program to streamline State emergency
medical technicians (EMT) requirements to assist veterans who
have completed military EMT training while serving in the Armed
Forces.
Legislative History
H.R. 235 was introduced by Representative Adam Kinzinger
(IL-16) on January 14, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On January 18, 2013, H.R. 235 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On January 22, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
met in open markup session to consider H.R. 235 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, without amendment, by
unanimous consent.
On February 4, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 235 to the House (H. Rept. 113-5), and the bill
was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 3)
On February 12, 2013, H.R. 235 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
without amendment, by a voice vote.
On February 13, 2013, H.R. 235 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 235.
Transparency in Tobacco User Fees Act of 2013
H.R. 389
To require the submission to the Congress of annual reports
on the tobacco user fees assessed and collected under section
919 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Summary
H.R. 389 amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to
require the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services to report annually to Congress on user fees assessed
on manufacturers and importers of tobacco products.
Legislative History
H.R. 389 was introduced by Representative Brett Guthrie
(KY-2) on January 23, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On January 25, 2013, H.R. 389 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On April 8, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining the Implementation of the Tobacco Control
Act'' and reviewed H.R. 389.
No further action was taken on H.R. 389.
To Provide for the Establishment of the Tick-Borne Diseases Advisory
Committee
H.R. 610
To provide for the establishment of the Tick-Borne Diseases
Advisory Committee
Summary
H.R. 610 establishes the Tick-Borne Diseases Advisory
Committee within the Office of the Secretary of the Department
of Health and Human Services to advise the Secretary and
Assistant Secretary for Health on (1) ensuring interagency
coordination and communication and minimize overlap, (2)
identifying opportunities to coordinate efforts with other
Federal agencies and private organizations, (3) ensuring
interagency coordination and communication with constituency
groups, (4) ensuring that a broad spectrum of scientific
viewpoints is represented in public health policy decisions,
and (5) advising relevant Federal agencies on priorities
related to Lyme and tick-borne diseases.
Legislative History
H.R. 610 was introduced by Representative Christopher H.
Smith (NJ-4) on February 12, 2013, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce. On February 15, 2013, H.R.
610 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 610.
No further action was taken on H.R. 610.
To Amend Part B of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act To Exclude
Customary Prompt Pay Discounts From Manufacturers to Wholesalers From
the Average Sales Price for Drugs and Biologicals Under Medicare
H.R. 800
To amend part B of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act
to exclude customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to
wholesalers from the average sales price for drugs and
biologicals under Medicare.
Summary
H.R. 800 amends Part B of Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act to exclude customary prompt pay discounts between
manufacturers and wholesalers from the average sales price in
calculating Medicare payments for drugs and biologicals.
Legislative History
H.R. 800 was introduced by Representative Ed Whitfield (KY-
1) on February 15, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways
and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 15, 2013, H.R. 800 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On June 28, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining Reforms to Improve the Medicare Part B
Drug Program for Seniors'' and reviewed H.R. 800.
No further action was taken on H.R. 800.
Cancer Patient Protection Act of 2013
H.R. 1416
To terminate application of sequestration to payment for
certain physician-administered drugs under Part B of the
Medicare program.
Summary
H.R. 1416 provides that, notwithstanding the Presidential
order issued on March 1, 2013, the budgetary resources
sequestered for payments for drugs and biologicals under
section 1847A of the Social Security Act shall be available for
obligation for drugs and biologicals furnished on or after
enactment of this Act in the same amount and manner as if such
order had not been issued. The bill also provides that the
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services shall
make such payments under Medicare Part B to reimburse for the
reduction in payments made under such order between April 1,
2013 and enactment of this Act.
Legislative History
H.R. 1416 was introduced by Representative Renee L. Ellmers
(NC-2) on April 9, 2013, and referred to the Committee on the
Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means and
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker. On April 12, 2013, H.R.
1416 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On June 28, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining Reforms to Improve the Medicare Part B
Drug Program for Seniors'' and reviewed H.R. 1416.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1416.
Comprehensive Immunosuppressive Drug Coverage for Kidney Transplant
Patients Act of 2013
H.R. 1428
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide
Medicare entitlement to immunosuppressive drugs for kidney
transplant recipients.
Summary
H.R. 1428 amends Title II of the Social Security Act to
extend the months of coverage for immunosuppressive drugs for
kidney transplant patients.
Legislative History
H.R. 1428 was introduced by Representative Michael C.
Burgess (TX-26) on April 9, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by
the Speaker. On April 12, 2013, H.R. 1428 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On June 28, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining Reforms to Improve the Medicare Part B
Drug Program for Seniors'' and reviewed H.R. 1428.
No further action was taken on H.R. 1428.
Helping Sick Americans Now Act
H.R. 1549
To amend Public Law 111-148 to transfer Fiscal Year 2013
through Fiscal Year 2016 funds from the Prevention and Public
Health Fund to carry out the temporary high risk health
insurance pool program for individuals with preexisting
conditions, and to extend access to such program to such
individuals who have had creditable coverage during the six
months prior to application for coverage through such program.
Summary
H.R. 1549 amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act to require the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services to use any unobligated funds from the Prevention
and Public Health Fund to carry out the temporary high risk
health insurance pool program. H.R. 1549 also eliminates the
eligibility requirement for the temporary high risk pool, which
prohibits an individual from having creditable coverage for six
months before applying for coverage through the pool.
Legislative History
H.R. 1549 was introduced by Representative Joseph R. Pitts
(PA-16) on April 15, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On April 16, 2013, H.R. 1549 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On April 17, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 1549 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by a roll
call vote of 27 yeas and 20 nays.
On April 19, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 1549 to the House, as amended (H. Rept. 113-45),
and the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No.
28).
No further action was taken on H.R. 1549.
Medicare Beneficiary Preservation of Choice Act of 2013
H.R. 2453
To preserve Medicare beneficiary choice by restoring and
expanding Medicare open enrollment and disenrollment
opportunities repealed by section 3204(a) of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Summary
H.R. 2453 amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
allow beneficiaries to elect to transfer from a Medicare
Advantage plan to a Medicare fee-for-service plan, or from a
Medicare fee-for-service plan to a Medicare Advantage plan. The
transfer option would be available once a year between January
1 and March 15.
Legislative History
H.R. 2453 was introduced by Representative Keith J. Rothfus
(PA-12) on June 20, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Ways
and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On June 21, 2013, H.R. 2453 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 2453.
No further action was taken on H.R. 2453.
Family Health Care Accessibility Act of 2013
H.R. 2703
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide liability
protections for volunteer practitioners at health centers under
section 330 of such Act.
Summary
H.R. 2703 amends the Public Health Service Act to deem a
health professional volunteer providing primary health care at
a community health center facility to be an employee of the
Public Health Service for purposes of any civil action that may
arise from providing services to patients.
Legislative History
H.R. 2703 was introduced by Representative Tim Murphy (PA-
18) on July 17, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce. On July 19, 2013, H.R. 2703 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 2703.
No further action was taken on H.R. 2703.
To Condition the Provision of Premium and Cost-Sharing Subsidies Under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Upon a Certification
That a Program To Verify Household Income and Other Qualifications for
Such Subsidies is Operational, and for Other Purposes
(Retitled ``Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014'')
H.R. 2775
Summary
H.R. 2775, as originally passed the House, provides that no
premium tax credits or reductions in cost-sharing for the
purchase of qualified health benefit plans under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) shall be allowed
before the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services certifies to Congress that there is a program in
place, consistent with PPACA requirements, that verifies the
household income and coverage requirements of individuals
applying for such credits and cost-sharing reductions.
Legislative History
H.R. 2775 was introduced by Representative Diane Black (TN-
6) on July 22, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and
Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On July 26, 2013, H.R. 2775 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On September 12, 2013, H.R. 2775 was considered in the
House pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 339, and the bill
was passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 235 yeas and 191
nays (Roll Call No. 458).
On September 16, 2013, H.R. 2775 was received in the
Senate, and on September 17, 2013, H.R. 2775 was read the first
time and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the
First Time. On September 18, 2013, H.R. 2775 was read the
second time and placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under
General Orders (Calendar No. 193).
On October 16, 2013, H.R. 2775 was laid before the Senate
by unanimous consent and passed the Senate, as amended, by a
roll call vote of 81 yeas and 18 nays (Roll Call No. 219).
On October 16, 2013, the Senate amendment to H.R. 2775 was
considered in the House pursuant to a previous special order,
and the bill was passed by a roll call vote of 285 yeas and 144
nays (Roll Call No. 550).
H.R. 2775, as amended, was presented to the President on
October 16, 2013, and the President signed the bill on October
17, 2013 (Public Law 113-46).
The provisions of H.R. 2775, as introduced and passed by
the House on September 12, 2013, were struck by the Senate
amendment and replaced by provisions related to the continuing
appropriations for Fiscal Year 2014.
Medicare Patient Access and Quality Improvement Act of 2013
H.R. 2810
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reform
the sustainable growth rate and Medicare payment for
physicians' services, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2810 amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
repeal the sustainable growth rate methodology from the
determination of annual conversion factors in the formula for
payment for physicians' services and prescribes an update to
the single conversion factor for 2014 through 2018 of 0.5
percent.
Legislative History
H.R. 2810 was introduced by Representative Michael C.
Burgess (TX-26) on July 24, 2013, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Ways and Means and the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period
to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. On July 24, 2013,
H.R. 2810 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On July 22 and 23, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 2810 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 30 and 31, 2013, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 2810 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 51 yeas and 0 nays.
On November 12, 2013, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 2810 to the House (H. Rept. 113-257, Part I).
On November 12, 2013, the Committee on the Judiciary was
discharged from further consideration of H.R. 2810.
On March 14, 2014, the Committee on Ways and Means reported
H.R. 2810 to the House (H. Rept. 113-257, Part II), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 283).
No further action was taken on H.R. 2810.
Medicare Patient Access to Cancer Treatment Act of 2013
H.R. 2869
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
establish payment parity under the Medicare program for
ambulatory cancer care services furnished in the hospital
outpatient department and the physician office setting.
Summary
H.R. 2869 amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act
with respect to the prospective payment system (PPS) for
outpatient services to require that the payment amount under
PPS and physician fee schedules for covered OPD cancer services
be a budget neutral combination of the amount otherwise payable
under the PPS and the amount otherwise payable under the
physician fee schedule for such services.
Legislative History
H.R. 2869 was introduced by Representative Mike J. Rogers
(MI-8) of Michigan on July 31, 2013, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker. On August 2, 2013, H.R. 2869 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On May 21, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Site of Service Medicare
Payment Reforms'' and reviewed H.R. 2869.
No further action was taken on H.R. 2869.
Sensible Oversight For Technology Which Advances Regulatory Efficiency
Act of 2013
H.R. 3303
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to
provide for regulating medical software, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3303 amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) to provide that the provisions of the FFDCA shall apply
to medical software to the same extent and in the same manner
as such provisions apply with respect to devices, and that
``clinical software'' and ``health software'' shall not be
subject to regulation under the FFDCA. The bill also excludes
``Medical Software,'' ``Clinical Software,'' and ``Health
Software'' from the definition of the term ``Device.''
Legislative History
H.R. 3303 was introduced by Representative Marsha Blackburn
(TN-7) on October 22, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Federal Regulation of Mobile
Medical Apps and Other Health Software'' and reviewed H.R.
3303.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3303.
Keep Your Health Plan Act of 2013
H.R. 3350
To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer
for sale current individual health insurance coverage in
satisfaction of the minimum essential health insurance coverage
requirement, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3350 permits a health insurance issuer that has in
effect health insurance coverage in the individual market as of
January 1, 2013, to continue offering such coverage for sale
during 2014. The bill also provides that such health insurance
coverage shall be treated as a grandfathered health plan for
purposes of section 1501(b) of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act.
Legislative History
H.R. 3350 was introduced by Representative Fred Upton (MI-
6) on October 28, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and
Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On November 1, 2013, the bill was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On November 15, 2013, H.R. 3350 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 413, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of 261 yeas and
157 nays (Roll Call No. 587).
On November 18, 2013, H.R. 3350 was received in the Senate,
and on December 20, 2013, the bill was read twice and referred
to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3350.
Exchange Information Disclosure Act
H.R. 3362
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to
require transparency in the operation of American Health
Benefit Exchanges.
Summary
H.R. 3362 directs the Department of Health and Human
Services to submit a report to Congress on consumer
interactions with the Internet website maintained by the
Federal Government for health insurance coverage and any
efforts undertaken to remedy problems that impact taxpayers and
consumers.
Legislative History
H.R. 3362 was introduced by Representative Lee Terry (NE-2)
on October 29, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and
Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker.
On November 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Obamacare Implementation Problems: More than
Just a Broken Website'' and reviewed H.R. 3362.
On January 16, 2014, H.R. 3362 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 455, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 259 yeas and 154
nays (Roll Call No. 23).
On January 27, 2014, H.R. 3362 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3362.
Medicare Part D Patient Safety and Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2013
H.R. 3392
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide
for a prescription drug plan safety program to prevent fraud
and abuse in the dispensing of controlled substances under Part
D of the Medicare program, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3392 amends Part D of Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act to establish a safe pharmacy access program under
which a prescription drug plan (PDP) sponsor (or a Medicare
Advantage (MA) organization offering an MA-PD plan) shall have
in place procedures designed to prevent fraud and abuse in the
dispensing of certain controlled substances under Medicare Part
D.
H.R. 3392 allows a PDP sponsor to suspend payments and
clean claim notifications to a pharmacy pending an
investigation of a credible allegation of fraud against the
pharmacy, unless the Secretary determines there is good cause
not to suspend payments.
Legislative History
H.R. 3392 was introduced by Representative Gus M. Bilirakis
(FL-12) on October 30, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways
and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On November 1, 2013, H.R. 3392 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 3392.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3392.
Employee Health Care Protection Act of 2013
H.R. 3522
To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer
for sale current group health insurance coverage in
satisfaction of the minimum essential health insurance coverage
requirement, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3522 permits a health insurance issuer that has in
effect health insurance coverage in the group market on any
date during 2013 to continue offering such coverage for sale
through 2018.
H.R. 3522 treats such coverage as a grandfathered health
plan for purposes of the minimum essential health coverage
requirement.
Legislative History
H.R. 3522 was introduced by Representative Bill Cassidy
(LA-6) on November 18, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways
and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On November 22, 2013, H.R. 3522 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On July 28, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting Americans from Illegal Bailouts and Plan
Cancellations Under the President's Health Care Law'' and
reviewed H.R. 3522.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 3522 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a roll call vote of 27 yeas and 20 nays.
On September 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 3522 to the House (H. Rept. 113-580, Part I), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 430).
On September 10, 2014, H.R. 3522 was considered in the
House pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 717, and on
September 11, 2014, the bill was passed, as amended, by a roll
call vote of 247 yeas and 167 nays (Roll Call No. 495).
On September 15, 2014, H.R. 3522 was received in the
Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3522.
National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting
Reauthorization Act of 2013
H.R. 3528
To amend and reauthorize the controlled substance
monitoring program under section 399O of the Public Health
Service Act.
Summary
H.R. 3528 reauthorizes the controlled substance monitoring
program under section 399O of the Public Health Service Act.
Legislative History
H.R. 3528 was introduced by Representative Ed Whitfield
(KY-1) on November 18, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On November 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to Help
Local Communities'' and reviewed H.R. 3528.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3528.
Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2013
H.R. 3717
To make available needed psychiatric, psychological, and
supportive services for individuals diagnosed with mental
illness and families in mental health crisis, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3717 establishes within the Department of Health and
Human Services an Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and
Substance Use Disorders, to supervise and direct the
Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration.
Legislative History
H.R. 3717 was introduced by Representative Tim Murphy (PA-
18) on December 12, 2013, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, the Committee on Education and the Workforce, the
Committee on Ways and Means, and the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker. On December 13, 2013, H.R. 3717 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On April 3, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of
2013'' and reviewed H.R. 3717.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3717.
Health Exchange Security and Transparency Act of 2014
H.R. 3811
To require notification of individuals of breaches of
personally identifiable information through Exchanges under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Summary
H.R. 3811 requires the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services to notify an individual within two
business days after discovery of any breach of security of any
system maintained by a health care exchange established under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that is known to
have resulted in the theft of or unlawful access to the
individual's personally identifiable information.
Legislative History
H.R. 3811 was introduced by Representative Joseph R. Pitts
(PA-16) on January 7, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On January 10, 2014, H.R. 3811 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 455, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of 291 yeas and
122 nays (Roll Call No. 11).
On January 13, 2014, H.R. 3811 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 3811.
SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment Modernization Act of 2014
H.R. 4015
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal
the Medicare sustainable growth rate and improve Medicare
payments for physicians and other professionals, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4015 amends Part B of Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act: (1) to end with 2013 the current formula for an
update to the single conversion factor in the formula for
payment for physicians' services, (2) to end and remove the
sustainable growth rate methodology from the determination of
such annual conversion factors, (3) to prescribe an update to
the single conversion factor of 0.5 percent for 2014 through
2018, (4) to freeze the update to the single conversion factor
at 0.00 percent for 2019 through 2023, and (5) to establish an
update of one percent for health professionals participating in
alternative payment models and an update of 0.5 percent for all
other health professionals for 2024 and subsequent years.
Legislative History
H.R. 4015 was introduced by Representative Michael C.
Burgess (TX-26) on February 6, 2014, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the
Committee on Ways and Means, and the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 7, 2014, H.R. 4015 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On March 14, 2014, H.R. 4015 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 515, and the bill was
passed, without amendment, by a roll call vote of 238 yeas and
181 nays (Roll Call No. 135).
On March 24, 2014, H.R. 4015 was received in the Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4015.
Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2013
H.R. 4069
To improve enforcement efforts related to prescription drug
diversion and abuse, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4069 amends the Controlled Substances Act to require
registrants to manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled
substances to obtain criminal background checks perform drug
testing on employees with access to facility areas where
controlled substances are stored.
H.R. 4069 requires such background checks to be obtained
when such an employee is hired and periodically thereafter, but
not more frequently than every two years, and authorizes
registration suspension or revocation and a $10,000 penalty for
failing to comply with such requirements.
Legislative History
H.R. 4069 was introduced by Representative Tom Marino (PA-
10) on February 18, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On February 21, 2014, H.R. 4067 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On April 7, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Improving Predictability and Transparency in DEA and
FDA Regulation'' and reviewed H.R. 4069.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4069.
Trauma Systems and Regionalization of Emergency Care Reauthorization
Act
H.R. 4080
To amend Title XII of the Public Health Service Act to
reauthorize certain trauma care programs, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4080 amends the Public Health Service Act to
reauthorize trauma care programs through Fiscal Year 2019. H.R.
4080 requires that not more than fifty percent of amounts
remaining for a Fiscal Year after Fiscal Year 2014 be allocated
for competitive grants to support pilot projects for emergency
care and trauma systems.
Legislative History
H.R. 4080 was introduced by Representative Michael C.
Burgess (TX-26) on February 25, 2014, and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce. On February 27, 2014, H.R.
4080 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in
open markup session to consider H.R. 4080 and forwarded the
bill to the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On April 3, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce met
in open markup session to consider H.R. 4080 and ordered the
bill favorably reported to the House, as amended, by unanimous
consent.
On May 20, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4080 to the House (H. Rept. 113-459), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 340).
On June 24, 2014, H.R. 4080 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On June 25, 2014, H.R. 4080 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4080.
To Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 To Allow Medicare
Beneficiaries Participating in a Medicare Advantage MSA To Contribute
Their Own Money to Their MSA
H.R. 4177
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow
Medicare beneficiaries participating in a Medicare Advantage
Medicare Savings Plan (MSA) to contribute their own money to
their MSA.
Summary
H.R. 4177 amends the Internal Revenue Code provisions
related to the tax treatment of payments to a Medicare
Advantage Medical Savings Account to eliminate the restriction
on contributions or transfers to such accounts.
Legislative History
H.R. 4177 was introduced by Representative Erik Paulsen
(MN-3) on March 6, 2014.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 4177.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4177.
To Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 To Permit Rollovers From
Health Savings Accounts to Medicare Advantage MSAs
H.R. 4180
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit
rollovers from health savings accounts to Medicare Advantage
MSAs.
Summary
H.R. 4180 amends the Internal Revenue Code to permit tax-
free rollover of funds in a health savings account into a
Medicare Advantage Medical Savings Account.
Legislative History
H.R. 4180 was introduced by Representative Dennis A. Ross
(FL-15) on March 6, 2014.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 4180.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4180.
Seniors' Fairness Act of 2014
H.R. 4196
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to
eliminate Exchange cost-sharing subsidies, to amend Title XVIII
of the Social Security Act to create a Medicare Advantage
Improvement Fund, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4196 amends Title XVIII Part C of the Social Security
Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to
establish a Medicare Advantage Improvement Fund.
H.R. 4196 amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act to terminate reduced cost-sharing for individuals enrolling
in qualified health plans beginning in plan year 2015.
Legislative History
H.R. 4196 was introduced by Representative Bill Johnson
(OH-6) on March 11, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, in addition to the Committee on Ways and
Means, and the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. On March
14, 2014, H.R. 4196 was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 4196.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4196.
Seniors' Rights to Know Act
H.R. 4201
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require
Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations to disclose certain
information on the changes made to the MA plan offered by such
organization pursuant to changes required by the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4201 amends Title XVIII Part C of the Social Security
Act to require the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services to provide Medicare beneficiaries a description
of the changes made by a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization
to the MA plan it offers pursuant to the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010. Such information may include an
assessment of the affect of such provisions on MA eligible
individuals who enroll in such a plan.
Legislative History
H.R. 4201 was introduced by Representative Jeff Denham (CA-
10) on March 11, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Ways
and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On March 14, 2014, H.R. 4201 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 4201.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4201.
Advantage of Medicare Advantage for Minorities and Low-Income Seniors
Act of 2014
H.R. 4211
To require the Comptroller General of the United States to
conduct studies on enrollment by racial and ethnic minorities
and by low-income seniors in the Medicare Advantage program.
Summary
H.R. 4211 directs the Comptroller General of the Government
Accountability Office to study enrollment by racial and ethnic
minorities and low-income seniors in the Medicare Advantage
(MA) program under Medicare Part C of Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act and the projected impact of payment reductions to
such MA program.
Legislative History
H.R. 4211 was introduced by Representative Jackie Walorski
(IN-2) on March 12, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Ways
and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On March 14, 2014, H.R. 4211 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them'' and
reviewed H.R. 4211.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4211.
Improving Regulatory Transparency for New Medical Therapies Act
H.R. 4299
To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to drug
scheduling recommendations by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, and with respect to registration of manufacturers and
distributors seeking to conduct clinical testing.
Summary
H.R. 4299 amends the Controlled Substances Act to direct
the Attorney General, within forty-five days of receiving a
recommendation from the Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services, to add a drug or substance that has never
been marketed in the United States to a schedule of controlled
substances.
H.R. 4299 authorizes a person who submits an application
for registration to manufacture or distribute a controlled
substance to indicate on the application that the substance
will be used only in connection with clinical trials of a drug.
The bill directs the Attorney General to make a final decision
on an application that includes such an indication within 180
days or provide written notice to the applicant of the
outstanding issues that must be resolved to reach a final
decision and the estimated date such decision will be made.
Legislative History
H.R. 4299 was introduced by Representative Joseph R. Pitts
(PA-16) on March 26, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On March 28, 2014, H.R. 4299 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On April 7, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Improving Predictability and Transparency in DEA and
FDA Regulation'' and reviewed H.R. 4299.
On May 28, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4299 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, without amendment, by a voice vote.
On June 9 and 10, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4299 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, without
amendment, by a voice vote.
On July 29, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4299 to the House (H. Rept. 113-565, Part I), and
the Committee on the Judiciary was granted an extension for
further consideration ending not later September 19, 2014.
On September 19, 2014, the Committee on the Judiciary
reported H.R. 4299 to the House (H. Rept. 113-565 Part II), and
the bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 451).
No further action was taken on H.R. 4299.
Expatriate Health Coverage Clarification Act of 2014
H.R. 4414
To clarify the treatment under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of health plans in which expatriates are
the primary enrollees, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4414 exempts expatriate health plans, employers acting
as sponsors of such plans, and health insurance issuers
providing coverage under such plans from the health care
coverage requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
of 2010.
H.R. 4414 also deems expatriate health coverage to be
minimum essential coverage for purposes of meeting the
individual responsibility requirements of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Legislative History
H.R. 4414 was introduced by Representative John C. Carney,
Jr. (DE-AL) on April 7, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means, in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, Committee on Education and the Workforce, Committee
on the Judiciary, Committee on Natural Resources, and Committee
on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker.
On April 9, 2014, H.R. 4414 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and bill failed by a roll
call vote of 257 yeas and 159 nays (2/3 required) (Roll Call
No. 174).
On April 29, 2014, H.R. 4414 was considered in the House
pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 555, and the bill was
passed, as amended, by a roll call vote of 268 yeas and 150
nays (Roll Call No. 182).
On April 30, 2014, H.R. 4414 was received in the Senate.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4414.
Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014
H.R. 4432
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with
respect to food produced from, containing, or consisting of a
bioengineered organism, the labeling of natural foods, and for
other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4432 directs the developer of a bioengineered organism
to submit a premarket biotechnology notification to the
Secretary of Health and Human Services at least 210 days before
the organism is first introduced into interstate commerce for a
food use or application.
H.R. 4432 authorizes the Secretary to require the label of
such food to disclose a material difference between food
produced from, containing, or consisting of a bioengineered
organism and its comparable marketed food, as necessary to
protect health and safety or to prevent the label or labeling
of such food from being false or misleading.
Legislative History
H.R. 4432 was introduced by Representative Mike Pompeo (KS-
4) on April 9, 2014 and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce. On April 11, 2014, H.R. 4432 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On December 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining FDA's Role in the Regulation of
Genetically Modified Food Ingredients'' and reviewed H.R. 4432.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4432.
Building and Coordinating Post-Acute Care Act of 2014
H.R. 4673
To amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide
bundled payments for post-acute care services under parts A and
B of Medicare, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4673 amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
require a single bundled payment for post-acute care services
under Medicare Part A and Part B.
Legislative History
H.R. 4673 was introduced by Representative David B.
McKinley (WV-1) on May 19, 2014, and referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means, in addition to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On May 23, 2014, H.R. 4673 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On May 21, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Site of Service Medicare
Payment Reforms'' and reviewed H.R. 4673.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4673.
Tick-Borne Disease Research Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
H.R. 4701
To provide for scientific frameworks with respect to
vector-borne diseases.
Summary
H.R. 4701 amends the Public Health Service Act to require
the Directors of the National Institutes of Health and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to develop
scientific frameworks for research on at least two vector-borne
diseases that have a high domestic incidence, and to convene a
working group for each identified disease.
Legislative History
H.R. 4701 was introduced by Representative Christopher P.
Gibson (NY-19) on May 21, 2014, and referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce. On May 23, 2014, H.R. 4701 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On June 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4701 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4701 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On September 8, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4701 to the House (H. Rept. 113-573), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 424).
On September 9, 2014, H.R. 4701 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On September 10, 2014, H.R. 4701 was received in the
Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4701.
Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2014
H.R. 4709
To improve enforcement efforts related to prescription drug
diversion and abuse, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 4709 amends the Controlled Substances Act to provide
that a determination by the Attorney General that a
registration to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a
controlled substance is ``consistent with the public health and
safety'' means that it has a substantial relationship to such
Act's purpose of preventing diversion and abuse of controlled
substances; and that a finding of ``imminent danger'' by the
Attorney General justifying immediate suspension of such a
registration means that there is a significant and present risk
of death or serious bodily harm that is more likely than not to
occur in the absence of such a suspension.
H.R. 4709 requires the Attorney General, before revoking or
suspending a registration to provide the registrant notice of
the grounds for doing so; to give the registrant an opportunity
to submit a corrective action plan within a reasonable time
period; and to determine whether, in light of the plan,
revocation or suspension proceedings should be discontinued or
deferred or additional changes need to be made in such plan.
Legislative History
H.R. 4709 was introduced by Representative Tom Marino (PA-
10) on May 21, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker. On May 23, 2014, H.R. 4709 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Health.
On May 28, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health met in open
markup session to consider H.R. 4709 and forwarded the bill to
the full Committee, without amendment, by a voice vote.
On June 9 and 10, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 4709 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a voice vote.
On July 29, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 4709 to the House (H. Rept. 113-605, Part I).
On July 29, 2014, H.R. 4709 was considered in the House
under a motion to suspend the Rules, and the bill was passed,
as amended, by a voice vote.
On July 30, 2014, H.R. 4709 was received in the Senate,
read twice, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
No further action was taken on H.R. 4709.
Protecting Americans From Illegal Bailouts Act of 2014
H.R. 5175
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to
repeal the risk corridor program, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 5175 amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act to repeal the risk corridor program for health plans
offered in the individual and small group markets.
Legislative History
H.R. 5175 was introduced by Representative Leonard Lance
(NJ-7) on July 23, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce. On July 25, 2014, H.R. 5175 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Health.
On July 28, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting Americans from Illegal Bailouts and Plan
Cancellations Under the President's Health Care Law'' and
reviewed H.R. 5175.
No further action was taken on H.R. 5175.
To Require the Secretary of Health and Human Services To Provide for
Recommendations for the Development and Use of Clinical Data Registries
for the Improvement of Patient Care
H.R. 5214
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to
provide for recommendations for the development and use of
clinical data registries for the improvement of patient care.
Summary
H.R. 5214 requires the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services to consult with clinical experts and
make recommendations for the use of clinical data registries to
improve patient care.
Legislative History
H.R. 5214 was introduced by Representative Pete Olson (TX-
22) on July 28, 2014, and referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce.
On July 29 and 30, 2014, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce met in open markup session to consider H.R. 5214 and
ordered the bill favorably reported to the House, as amended,
by a roll call vote of 25 yeas and 18 nays.
On December 22, 2014, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
reported H.R. 5214 to the House (H. Rept. 113-683), and the
bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 514).
No further action was taken on H.R. 5214.
Trafficking Awareness Training for Health Care Act of 2014
H.R. 5411
To provide for the development and dissemination of
evidence-based best practices for health care professionals to
recognize victims of a severe form of trafficking and respond
to such individuals appropriately, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 5411 develops evidence-based best practices for health
care workers to identify and assist victims of human
trafficking and provides for the development of best practices
for health care workers and a pilot project to ensure that the
best practices are effective.
Legislative History
H.R. 5411 was introduced by Representative Renee L. Ellmers
(NC-2) on September 8, 2014, and referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce.
On September 11, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining H.R. 5411, the Trafficking
Awareness Training for Health Care Act of 2014'' and reviewed
H.R. 5411.
No further action was taken on H.R. 5411.
CHIMP Act Amendments of 2013
S. 1561
To amend the Public Health Service Act to improve
provisions relating to the sanctuary system for surplus
chimpanzees.
Summary
S. 1561 amends the Public Health Service Act with respect
to the lifetime care of chimpanzees used in Federally conducted
or supported medical research. S. 1561 removes the construction
and renovation of sanctuary system facilities as a purpose of
expenditure of the reserved funds. The use of funds for other
compliant facilities must be determined by the Secretary. Under
current law, such a determination is made by the board of
directors of the entity operating the facility.
Legislative History
S. 1561 was introduced by Senator Tom Harkin (IA) on
September 30, 2013, and referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions.
On October 30, 2013, S. 1561 was ordered favorably
reported, as amended, to the Senate and Senator Harkin reported
the bill without a written report. S. 1561 was placed on the
Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No.
228).
On October 31, 2013, S. 1561 passed the Senate, as amended,
by unanimous consent.
On November 12, 2013, S. 1561 was received in the House and
referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
No further action was taken on S. 1561. See S. 252 for
further action on provisions related to S. 1561.
No further action was taken on S. 1561.
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
SGR: Data, Measures and Models; Building a Future Medicare Physician
Payment System
On February 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``SGR: Data, Measures and Models; Building a
Future Medicare Physician Payment System.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to discuss the Sustainable Growth Rate model. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission, Network for Regional Healthcare
Improvement, Maine Health Management Coalition, Urban
Institute, and Pardee RAND Graduate School.
Fostering Innovation to Fight Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Health Care
On February 27, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Fostering Innovation to Fight Waste, Fraud
and Abuse in Health Care.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid
programs. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Government
Accountability Office, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana,
and Greene LLP.
Obamacare's Impact on Jobs
On March 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Obamacare's Impact on Jobs.'' The purpose of
the hearing was to analyze the impact of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act on job availability and employer-
sponsored health coverage. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Manhattan Institute, the National Restaurant
Association, and the Urban Institute.
Unaffordable: Impact of Obamacare on Americans' Health Insurance
Premiums
On March 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Unaffordable: Impact of Obamacare on
Americans' Health Insurance Premiums.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to review the impact of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) on health insurance premiums. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the American Action Forum,
Oliver Wyman, and the Center for Public Integrity.
Saving Seniors and Our Most Vulnerable Citizens From an Entitlement
Crisis
On March 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Saving Seniors and Our Most Vulnerable
Citizens from an Entitlement Crisis.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to hear from experts on the fiscal health and long-
term sustainability of Medicare and Medicaid. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Ethics and Public Policy Center,
the Pioneer Institute, and Georgetown Public Policy Institute.
Health Information Technologies: How Innovation Benefits Patients
On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Health Innovation Technologies: How
Innovation Benefits Patients.'' The purpose of the hearing was
to examine how innovative technologies will benefit American
patients and what steps can be taken to foster this innovation.
The Subcommittee received testimony from West Health Institute,
McKesson Health Solutions, the Newborn Coalition, the National
Partnership for Women and Families, and the University of Utah
School of Medicine.
Protecting America's Sick and Chronically Ill
On April 3, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting America's Sick and Chronically Ill.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to examine the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act's Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan
and to explore ways to help Americans with pre-existing
conditions obtain affordable health coverage. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the State of Ohio, the American
Enterprise Institute, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society,
Families USA, and The Commonwealth Fund.
Strengthening Medicare for Seniors: Understanding the Challenges of
Traditional Medicare's Benefit Design
On April 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Strengthening Medicare for Seniors:
Understanding the Challenges of Traditional Medicare's Benefit
Design.'' The purpose of the hearing was to review the
challenges with the current Medicare benefit design and examine
ways to improve the program. The Subcommittee received
testimony from members of the Medicare Payment Advisory
Commission.
A Financial Review of the Department of Health and Human Services and
Its FY 2014 Budget
On April 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``A Financial Review of the Department of
Health and Human Services and Its FY 2014 Budget.'' The purpose
of the hearing was to examine the President's proposed Fiscal
Year 2014 Budget for the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) and the Department's efforts to implement the
new health care law. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the Secretary of the HHS.
Securing Our Nation's Prescription Drug Supply Chain
On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Securing Our Nation's Prescription Drug
Supply Chain.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on
securing the downstream pharmaceutical supply chain, which
includes manufacturers, wholesale distributors, pharmacies, re-
packagers, and third-party logistics providers. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Food and Drug
Administration, Healthcare Distribution Management Association,
Generic Pharmaceutical Association, Johnson and Johnson Health
Care Systems, Inc., National Community Pharmacists Association,
The Pew Charitable Trusts, and the National Association of
Boards of Pharmacy.
Examining Drug Compounding
On May 23, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining Drug Compounding.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to better understand the current state of drug
compounding in America. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Food and Drug Administration, the American Enterprise
Institute, National Community Pharmacist Association,
Migliaccio Consulting, the National Association of Boards of
Pharmacy, and The Pew Charitable Trusts.
The Need for Medicaid Reform: A State Perspective
On June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled, ``The Need for Medicaid Reform: A State
Perspective.'' The purpose of the hearing was to review the
Medicaid program and potential reforms. The Subcommittee
received testimony from SVC, Inc., South Carolina Department of
Health and Human Services, and the Arkansas Center for Health
Improvement.
Examining the Federal Government's Response to the Prescription Drug
Abuse Crisis
On June 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining the Federal Government's Response to the
Prescription Drug Abuse Crisis.'' The purpose of the hearing
was to provide the Subcommittee with an opportunity to hear
from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and
the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) on the
current Federal efforts to fight prescription drug abuse. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the FDA, SAMHSA, and
ONDCP.
A 21st Century Medicare: Bipartisan Proposals To Redesign the Program's
Outdated Benefit Structure
On June 26, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``A 21st Century Medicare: Bipartisan Proposals to
Redesign the Program's Outdated Benefit Structure.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to review the current Medicare
benefit design and examine ways to improve the program. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Department of Health
Policy and Management at the Harvard School of Public Health,
the American Enterprise Institute, and the Henry J. Kaiser
Family Foundation.
Making Medicaid Work for the Most Vulnerable
On July 8, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Making Medicaid Work for the Most Vulnerable.'' The
purpose of this hearing was to examine potential reforms to
improve Medicaid. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Heritage Foundation, the Foundation for Government
Accountability, and the National Academy for State Health
Policy.
PPACA Pulse Check: Part 2
On September 10, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``PPACA Pulse Check: Part 2.'' The purpose of
the hearing was to focus on the readiness and implementation
issues surrounding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act. The Subcommittee received testimony from Equifax Workforce
Solutions, Serco, CGI Federal, QSSI, Leavitt Partners,
Employers for Flexibility in Health Care Coalition, and
Pennsylvania Health Access Network.
Obamacare Implementation Problems: More Than Just a Broken Website
On November 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Obamacare Implementation Problems: More than
Just a Broken Website.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the implementation of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, the Washington
Policy Center, Georgetown University, Camden Bible Tabernacle,
and a former commissioner of the Social Security
Administration.
Reviewing FDA's Implementation of FDASIA
On November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Reviewing FDA's Implementation of FDASIA.''
The purpose of the hearing was to focus on the Food and Drug
Administration's (FDA) implementation of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation Act. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the FDA.
Examining Federal Regulation of Mobile Medical Apps and Other Health
Software
On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Federal Regulation of Mobile
Medical Apps and Other Health Software.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to focus on the Food and Drug Administration's
(FDA) final medical app guidance published in September 2013.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the FDA, McKesson
Technology Solutions, Newborn Coalition, IBM Research, Qualcomm
Incorporated, and the American Cancer Society.
Medicare Advantage: What Beneficiaries Should Expect Under the
President's Health Care Plan
On December 4, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Medicare Advantage: What Beneficiaries
Should Expect Under the President's Health Care Plan.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to examine the impact of the
Affordable Care Act on the Medicare Advantage program and its
beneficiaries. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
American Action Forum, the California Association of Physician
Groups, Boston Consulting Group, Medicare Rights Center, and
Mathematica Policy Research.
PPACA Implementation Problems: What's Next
On December 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation Problems: What's
Next?'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on the
implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Department of
Health and Human Services.
The Extenders Policies: What are They and How Should They Continue
Under a Permanent SGR Repeal Landscape?
On January 9, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``The Extenders Policies: What Are They and
How Should They Continue Under a Permanent SGR Repeal
Landscape?'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on the
expiring health-related provisions that are typically
considered together with the annual Medicare physician payment
formula update. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, the Medicaid and CHIP
Payment and Access Commission, the Health Resources and
Services Administration, and the Administration for Children
and Families.
Examining the Implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act
On February 5, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining the Implementation of the Food
Safety Modernization Act.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
focus on the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA)
implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The
Subcommittee received testimony from the FDA.
Examining Drug Shortages and Recent Efforts To Address Them
On February 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Drug Shortages and Recent Efforts
to Address Them.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on
the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) efforts to prevent and
mitigate shortages since the enactment of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation Act in July 2012. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the FDA and the Government
Accountability Office.
Messing With Success: How CMS' Attack on the Part D Program Will
Increase Costs and Reduce Choices for Seniors
On February 26, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Messing With Success: How CMS' Attack on the
Part D Program Will Increase Costs and Reduce Choices for
Seniors.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on the
proposed rule, which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services released on January 6, 2014, that would make major
alterations to the Part D program under Medicare. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, the American Action Forum, The AIDS
Institute, and the Medicare Rights Center.
Keeping the Promise: How Better Managing Medicare Can Protect Seniors
On March 4, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Keeping the Promise: How Better Managing Medicare
Can Protect Seniors.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the role that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services contractors play in the management of the Medicare
program, and to explore options to enhance their overall
effectiveness. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Government Accountability Office, and the Department of Health
and Human Services Office of Inspector General.
Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors To Keep Their Medicare Advantage
Plans If They Like Them
On March 13, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plans If They Like Them.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to focus on the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services' February 21, 2014 notice of proposed
cuts to the Medicare Advantage program for 2015.
The Subcommittee received testimony from Representative
Dennis A. Ross (FL-15), Representative Erik Paulsen (MN-3),
Representative Jeff Denham (CA-10), Representative Jackie
Walorski (IN-2), Representative Keith J. Rothfus (PA-12),
Prospect Medical Systems, Oliver Wyman Consulting Actuaries,
the Center for Medicare Advocacy, the Center on Budget and
Policy Priorities, and a Medicare beneficiary with a Medicare
Advantage Plan.
Examining Concerns Regarding FDA's Proposed Changes to Generic Drug
Labeling
On April 1, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining Concerns Regarding FDA's Proposed Changes
to Generic Drug Labeling.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
focus on a proposed rule issued by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) on November 13, 2013, which would alter
generic drug labeling requirement established under the 1984
Hatch-Waxman amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
The Subcommittee received testimony from FDA, Kirkland and
Ellis, LLP, the Generic Pharmaceutical Association, and Public
Citizen.
Examining the Implementation of the Tobacco Control Act
On April 8, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Examining the Implementation of the Tobacco Control
Act.'' The purpose of the hearing was to review the Government
Accountability Office's (GAO) examination of the regulatory
activities of the Food and Drug Administration's Center for
Tobacco Products. The Subcommittee received testimony from GAO.
Telehealth to Digital Medicine: How 21st Century Technology Can Benefit
Patients
On May 1, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Telehealth to Digital Medicine: How 21st Century
Technology Can Benefit Patients.'' The purpose of the hearing
was to discuss promising health technologies, explore the
implications of adopting such technologies, and how such
technologies could transform the delivery of health care in the
United States. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
University of Michigan School of Public Health, Harvard Medical
School, Lancaster General Health, Parkinson's Action Network,
and American Well.
21st Century Cures: The President's Council of Advisors on Science and
Technology (PCAST) Report on Drug Innovation
On May 20, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``21st Century Cures: The President's Council on
Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) Report on Drug
Innovation.'' The purpose of the hearing was to hear from
experts involved in the development of the PCAST report. The
Subcommittee received testimony from Medgenics, the
Biotechnology Industry Organization, Hyman, Phelps and
McNamara, Friends of Cancer Research, and the Center for
Medical Technology Policy.
Keeping the Promise: Site of Service Medicare Payment Reforms
On May 21, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Site of Service Medicare
Payment Reforms.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on
the proposed site-of-service payment reforms in Medicare and to
examine those issues with important stakeholders. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission, U.S. Oncology Network, Regional Medical
Center, The Brookings Institute, the Visiting Nurse Association
Health Group, and Coalition to Preserve Rehabilitation.
21st Century Cures: Examining the Role of Incentives in Advancing
Treatments and Cures for Patients
On June 11, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining the Role of Incentives
in Advancing Treatments and Cures for Patients.'' The purpose
of the hearing was to gain a better understanding of whether
current economic and regulatory incentives were sufficient to
encourage robust investment in research and development of
innovative drugs and medical devices. The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mount Sinai Health System, National Health
Council, Third Rock Ventures, Advanced Technology Ventures,
Bentley University, Columbia Law School, and Express Scripts
Holding Company.
The President's Health Care Law Does Not Equal Health Care Access
On June 12, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``The President's Health Care Law Does Not Equal
Health Care Access.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus
on the challenges patients face in accessing providers and
medicines through coverage obtained in the Patient Protection
and Affordable Act's health insurance exchanges. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the American Enterprise
Institute, the Montana Office of the Commissioner of Securities
and Insurance, and the American College of Rheumatology.
21st Century Cures: Modernizing Clinical Trials
On July 9, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``21st Century Cures: Modernizing Clinical Trials.''
The purpose of the hearing was to focus on ways to make
clinical trials more efficient and effective by leveraging
recent advances in science and technology. The Subcommittee
received testimony from Yale Cancer Center, the Mayo Clinic,
Johnson and Johnson, the Medical Device Innovation Consortium,
University of Virginia School of Medicine, Quintiles, and
Brigham and Women's Hospital.
21st Century Cures: Incorporating the Patient Perspective
On July 11, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``21st Century Cures: Incorporating the Patient
Perspective.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on how
to incorporate the perspective of patients in the discovery,
development, and delivery of treatments and cures. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Food and Drug
Administration, Alkermes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation,
Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, American Cancer Society, and
National Organization for Rare Disorders.
Failure to Verify: Concerns Regarding PPACA's Eligibility System
On July 16, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Failure to Verify: Concerns Regarding PPACA's
Eligibility System.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus
on the state of the health care law's exchange eligibility
system and the processing of health care applications in the
Federally Facilitated Marketplace. The Subcommittee received
testimony from the Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Inspector General.
21st Century Technology for 21st Century Cures
On July 17, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health and the
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology held a joint
hearing entitled ``21st Century Technology for 21st Cures.''
The purpose of the hearing was to focus on communication
technologies being developed for the health sector and to
explore how companies are harnessing the innovations in
communications technology to improve patient outcomes and spur
advances in health care. The Subcommittee received testimony
from Qualcomm Incorporated, Amazon, McKesson Corporation,
Health Fidelity, and LyfeChannel.
21st Century Cures: Examining Barriers to Ongoing Evidence Development
and Communication
On July 22, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining Barriers to Ongoing
Evidence Development and Communication.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to focus on issues surrounding the development and
communication of treatments and cures in the real world
setting. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Healthcare Leadership Council, Edwards Lifesciences, Carolina
Arthritis Associates, The Pew Charitable Trusts, and ADVI.
Protecting Americans From Illegal Bailouts and Plan Cancellations Under
the President's Health Care Law
On July 28, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting Americans from Illegal Bailouts and Plan
Cancellations Under the President's Health Care Law.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to focus on taxpayer liability and
legal issues regarding payments to health insurance companies
under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's (PPACA)
risk corridor program and plan cancellations and the ability of
American workers to keep their group health plan under PPACA.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the Heritage
Foundation, American Enterprise Institute, and the Health
Policy Institute at Georgetown University.
21st Century Cures: Examining the Regulation of Laboratory Developed
Tests
On September 9, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining the Regulation
of Laboratory Developed Tests.'' The purpose of the hearing was
to focus on how laboratory developed tests are performed in
clinical practice, what their impact has been on personalized
medicine, and how innovation can continue to be fostered. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Food and Drug
Administration, Harvard Medical School, AdvaMed Diagnostics,
American Clinical Laboratory Association, American Association
for Cancer Research, and Coalition for 21st Century Medicine.
21st Century Cures: Examining Ways to Combat Antibiotic Resistance and
Foster New Drug Development
On September 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining Ways to Combat
Antibiotic Resistance and Foster New Drug Development.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to focus ways to combat ongoing drug
resistance health threats. The Subcommittee received testimony
from the Food and Drug Administration, Achaogen, Infectious
Disease Society of America, Boston University School of Law,
Janssen Global Services, The Pew Charitable Trusts, and George
Washington University School of Medicine.
Examining Medical Product Development in the Wake of the Ebola Epidemic
On November 19, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining Medical Product Development in the
Wake of the Ebola Epidemic.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
focus on medical product development, including treatments,
vaccines and diagnostics, relating to the Ebola epidemic. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the National Institutes of
Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, and the Department of Health
and Human Services.
The Future of the Children's Health Insurance Program
On December 3, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``The Future of the Children's Health
Insurance Program.'' The purpose of the hearing was to learn
about key issues that Congress should evaluate as it considers
the future of the State Children's Health Insurance Program,
including the current the status of the program and how the
President's health care law has affected it. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Congressional Research Service, the
U.S. Government Accountability Office, and the Medicaid and
CHIP Payment and Access Commission.
Setting Fiscal Priorities
On December 9, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Setting Fiscal Priorities.'' The purpose of
the hearing was to learn about key policy decisions the
Committee may face in the 114th Congress. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Medicare Payment Advisory
Commission, the American Action Forum, the Committee for a
Responsible Federal Budget, and the Georgetown Public Policy
Institute.
Examining FDA's Role in the Regulation of Genetically Modified Food
Ingredients
On December 10, 2014, the Subcommittee on Health held a
hearing entitled ``Examining FDA's role in the Regulation of
Genetically Modified Food Ingredients.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to focus on current U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) authority over foods from genetically
engineered plants and what the agency has learned about the
safety of such products. The Subcommittee received testimony
from FDA, University of California Davis, Environmental Working
Group, Vermont House of Representatives, Kansas Farm Bureau,
and Snack Food Association.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``SGR: Data, Measures and Models; Building
a Future Medicare Physician Payment System.'' (February 14,
2013) Serial Number 113-6.
Hearing entitled ``Fostering Innovation to Fight Waste,
Fraud and Abuse in Health Care.'' (February 27, 2013) Serial
Number 113-10.
Hearing entitled ``Obamacare's Impact on Jobs.'' (March 13,
2013) Serial Number 113-14.
Hearing entitled ``Unaffordable: Impact of Obamacare on
Americans' Health Insurance Premiums.'' (March 15, 2013) Serial
Number 113-17.
Hearing entitled ``Saving Seniors and Our Most Vulnerable
Citizens from an Entitlement Crisis.'' (March 18, 2013) Serial
Number 113-18.
Hearing entitled ``Health Information Technologies: How
Innovation Benefits Patients.'' (March 20, 2013) Serial Number
113-21.
Hearing entitled ``Protecting America's Sick and
Chronically Ill.'' (April 3, 2013) Serial Number 113-24.
Hearing entitled ``Reauthorization of Animal Drug User
Fees: ADUFA and AGDUFA.'' (April 9, 2013) Serial Number 113-25.
Hearing entitled ``Strengthening Medicare for Seniors:
Understanding the Challenges of Traditional Medicare's Benefit
Design.'' (April 11, 2013) Serial Number 113-28.
Hearing entitled ``A Financial Review of the Department of
Health and Human Services and Its FY 2014 Budget.'' (April 18,
2013) Serial Number 113-33.
Hearing entitled ``Securing Our Nation's Prescription Drug
Supply Chain.'' (April 25, 2013) Serial Number 113-35.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Drug Compounding.'' (May 23,
2013) Serial Number 113-48.
Hearing entitled ``Reforming SGR: Prioritizing Quality in a
Modernized Physician Payment System.'' (June 5, 2013) Serial
Number 113-50.
Hearing entitled ``The Need for Medicaid Reform: A State
Perspective.'' (June 12, 2013) Serial Number 113-51.
Hearing entitled ``Examining the Federal Government's
Response to the Prescription Drug Abuse Crisis.'' (June 14,
2013) Serial Number 113-55.
Hearing entitled ``A 21st Century Medicare: Bipartisan
Proposals to Redesign the Program's Outdated Benefit
Structure.'' (June 26, 2013) Serial Number 113-59.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Reforms to Improve the
Medicare Part B Drug Program for Seniors.'' (June 28, 2013)
Serial Number 113-64.
Hearing entitled ``Making Medicaid Work for the Most
Vulnerable.'' (July 8, 2013) Serial Number 113-65.
Hearing entitled ``Reforming the Drug Compounding
Regulatory Framework.'' (July 16, 2013) Serial Number 113-70.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Pulse Check: Part 2.'' (September
10, 2013) Serial Number 113-80.
Hearing entitled ``Obamacare Implementation Problems: More
than Just a Broken Website.'' (November 14, 2013) Serial Number
113-95.
Hearing entitled ``Reviewing FDA's Implementation of
FDASIA.'' (November 15, 2013) Serial Number 113-98.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Federal Regulation of Mobile
Medical Apps and Other Health Software.'' (November 19, 2013)
Serial Number 113-99.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Public Health Legislation to
Help Local Communities.'' (November 20, 2013) Serial Number
113-101.
Hearing entitled ``Medicare Advantage: What Beneficiaries
Should Expect Under the President's Health Care Plan.''
(December 4, 2013) Serial Number 113-105.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation Failures: What's
Next?'' (December 11, 2013) Serial Number 113-108.
Hearing entitled ``The Extenders Policies: What Are They
and How Should They Continue Under a Permanent SGR Repeal
Landscape?'' (January 9, 2014) Serial Number 113-111.
Hearing entitled ``Examining the Implementation of the Food
Safety Modernization Act.'' (February 5, 2014) Serial Number
113-116.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Drug Shortages and Recent
Efforts to Address Them.'' (February 10, 2014) Serial Number
113-117.
Hearing entitled ``Messing With Success: How CMS' Attack on
the Part D Program Will Increase Costs and Reduce Choices for
Seniors.'' (February 26, 2014) Serial Number 113-119.
Hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: How Better Managing
Medicare Can Protect Seniors.'' (March 4, 2014) Serial Number
113-123.
Hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare Advantage Plan If They Like Them.'' (March
13, 2014) Serial Number 113-127.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Concerns Regarding FDA's
Proposed Changes to Generic Drug Labeling.'' (April 1, 2014)
Serial Number 113-132.
Hearing entitled ``Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis
Act of 2013.'' (April 3, 2014) Serial Number 113-136.
Hearing entitled ``Improving Predictability and
Transparency in DEA and FDA Regulation.'' (April 7, 2014)
Serial Number 113-137.
Hearing entitled ``Examining the Implementation of the
Tobacco Control Act.'' (April 8, 2014) Serial Number 113-139.
Hearing entitled ``Telehealth to Digital Medicine: How 21st
Century Technology Can Benefit Patients.'' (May 1, 2014) Serial
Number 113-142.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: The President's
Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) Report on
Drug Innovation.'' (May 20, 2014) Serial Number 113-145.
Hearing entitled ``Keeping the Promise: Site of Service
Medicare Payment Reforms.'' (May 21, 2014) Serial Number 113-
148.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining the Role
of Incentives in Advancing Treatments and Cures for Patients.''
(June 11, 2014) Serial Number 113-151.
Hearing entitled ``The President's Health Care Law Does Not
Equal Health Care Access.'' (June 12, 2014) Serial Number 113-
153.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Modernizing Clinical
Trials.'' (July 9, 2014) Serial Number 113-157.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Incorporating the
Patient Perspective.'' (July 11, 2014) Serial Number 113-158.
Hearing entitled ``Failure to Verify: Concerns Regarding
PPACA's Eligibility Requirements.'' (July 16, 2014) Serial
Number 113-161.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Technology for 21st Century
Cures.'' (July 17, 2014) Serial Number 113-162.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining Barriers
to Ongoing Evidence Development and Communication.'' (July 22,
2014) Serial Number 113-163.
Hearing entitled ``Protecting Americans from Illegal
Bailouts and Plan Cancellations Under the President's Health
Care Law.'' (July 28, 2014) Serial Number 113-167.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining the
Regulation of Laboratory Developed Tests.'' (September 9, 2014)
Serial Number 113-171.
Hearing entitled ``Examining H.R. 5411, the Trafficking
Awareness Training for Health Care Act of 2014.'' (September
11, 2014) Serial Number 113-173.
Hearing entitled ``21st Century Cures: Examining Ways to
Combat Antibiotic Resistance and Foster New Drug Development.''
(September 19, 2014) Serial Number 113-178.
Hearing entitled ``Examining Medical Product Development in
the Wake of the Ebola Epidemic.'' (November 19, 2014) Serial
Number 113-181.
Hearing entitled ``The Future of the Children's Health
Insurance Program.'' (December 3, 2014) Serial Number 113-184.
Hearing entitled ``Setting Fiscal Priorities.'' (December
9, 2014) Serial Number 113-185.
Hearing entitled ``Examining FDA's Role in the Regulation
of Genetically Modified Food Ingredients.'' (December 10, 2014)
Serial Number 113-186.
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
(Ratio 14-12)
TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania, Chairman
DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado, MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas,
Ranking Member Vice Chairman
BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
BEN RAY LUJJAN, New Mexico PHIL GINGREY, Georgia
JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana
G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
KATHY CASTOR, Florida PETE OLSON, Texas
PETER WELCH, Vermont CORY GARDNER, Colorado
PAUL TONKO, New York H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia
JOHN YARMUTH, Kentucky BILL JOHNSON, Ohio
GENE GREEN, Texas BILLY LONG, Missouri
JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan RENEE L. ELLMERS, North Carolina
(Ex Officio non-voting) JOE BARTON, Texas
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan
(Ex Officio) (Ex Officio)
Jurisdiction: Responsibility for oversight of agencies, departments,
and programs within the jurisdiction of the full committee, and for
conducting investigations within such jurisdiction.
HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO HEALTH MATTERS
Influenza: Perspective on Current Season and Update on Preparedness
On February 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Influenza: Perspective
on Current Season and Update on Preparedness.'' The purpose of
the hearing was to provide perspective on the coming flu season
and to address ongoing efforts at the Federal level to prepare
for and respond to future influenza outbreaks. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and the
Government Accountability Office.
After Newtown: A National Conversation on Violence and Severe Mental
Illness
On March 5, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations hosted a bipartisan public forum, ``After
Newtown: A National Conversation on Violence and Severe Mental
Illness.'' During that forum, parents and psychiatrists raised
concerns that the Health Information Portability and
Accountability Act's (HIPAA) privacy rule may interfere with
the timely and continuous flow of health information among
health care providers, patients, and families, impeding patient
care, and in some cases, public safety.
Health Information Technologies: Administration Perspectives on
Innovation and Regulation
On March 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Health Information
Technologies: Administration Perspectives on Innovation and
Regulation.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine the
positions of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on new and emerging
health information technologies and the regulatory regimes
necessary to address them. The Subcommittee received testimony
from HHS and FDA.
A Continuing Investigation Into the Fungal Meningitis Outbreak and
Whether it Could Have Been Prevented
On April 16, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``A Continuing
Investigation into the Fungal Meningitis Outbreak and Whether
It Could Have Been Prevented.'' The purpose of the hearing was
to continue the Subcommittee's examination of the facts
surrounding the 2012 outbreak of fungal meningitis caused by
contaminated steroids made and distributed by the New England
Compounding Center (NECC) in Framingham, Massachusetts. The
Subcommittee examined the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA)
history with drug compounding, and with NECC and its sister
company, Ameridose. The Subcommittee received testimony from
FDA.
The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight and the
Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
On April 24, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``The Center for
Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight and the
Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine the
implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Center for
Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.
Does HIPAA Help or Hinder Patient Care and Public Safety?
On April 26, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Does HIPAA Help or
Hinder Patient Care and Public Safety?'' The purpose of this
hearing was to explore how the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) may interfere with patient care and
public safety, either through misunderstanding or application,
of the law. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights,
the University of Louisville's School of Medicine's Institute
for Bioethics, Health Policy and Law, Primary Children's
Medical Center's Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Health, United Hospital Fund, the Center for Democracy and
Technology, and families impacted by HIPAA.
Health Insurance Premiums Under the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act
On May 20, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Health Insurance
Premiums under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act's impact on health insurance
premiums. The Subcommittee received testimony from the American
Academy of Actuaries, Oliver Wyman Group, America's Health
Insurance Plans, and the Center for American Progress.
Examining SAMHSA's Role in Delivering Services to the Severely Mentally
Ill
On May 22, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Examining SAMHSA's
Role in Delivering Services to the Severely Mentally Ill.'' The
hearing examined the role of the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), focusing on the Center
for Mental Health Services and grants and programs that address
serious mental illness (SMI). The Subcommittee received
testimony from SAMHSA, the Treatment Advocacy Center, American
Enterprise Institute, Missouri's Department of Mental Health,
and the father of a son with SMI.
Continuing Concerns Over Biowatch and the Surveillance of Bioterrorism
On June 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Continuing Concerns
Over BioWatch and the Surveillance of Bioterrorism.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to examine the effectiveness and
efficiency of BioWatch, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
program, and its relationship with the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), and State and local public health
authorities. The Subcommittee received testimony from the DHS'
Office of Health Affairs and the CDC's National Center for
Emerging and Zoonotic Infections Diseases' Division of
Preparedness and Emerging Infections.
Challenges Facing America's Businesses Under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act
On June 26, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Challenges Facing
America's Businesses under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's impact
on America's businesses. The Subcommittee received testimony
from Ruby Falls, LLC, Hamill Manufacturing Company, Sparkle and
Shine Cleaning Services, Inc., Hobby Works, the National Retail
Federation, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National
Restaurant Association, and Main Street Alliance.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Implementation in the Wake
of Administrative Delay
On July 18, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act: Implementation in the Wake of
Administrative Delay.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the Administration's announcements regarding the
employer mandate and eligibility verification requirements
contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the Department of
Treasury.
Two Weeks Until Enrollment: Questions for CCIIO
On September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Two Weeks Until
Enrollment: Questions for CCIIO.'' The purpose of the hearing
was to examine the impending start of enrollment for the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services' Center for Consumer Information and Insurance
Oversight.
Security of Healthcare.gov
On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Security of
HealthCare.gov.'' The purpose of the hearing was to focus on
the issues surrounding theimplementation of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act's health insurance exchanges and the
security of HealthCare.gov. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Foreground Security,
Inc., Creative Computing Solutions, Inc., and MITRE Corporation.
2014: Seeking PPACA Answers
On January 16, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``2014: Seeking PPACA
Answers.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine the full
implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (PPACA). Specifically, the hearing focused on the changes
made to HealthCare.gov since its launch, how the exchanges are
performing two weeks into full implementation, what the Center
for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight's (CCIIO)
experience has been as the country begins full implementation
of the law, and what additional programs or policies the public
could expect in 2014. The Subcommittee received testimony from
CCIIO.
Counterfeit Drugs: Fighting Illegal Supply Chains
On February 27, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Counterfeit Drugs:
Fighting Illegal Supply Chains.'' The purpose of the hearing
was to explore the public health threat of counterfeit drugs,
and to build on the recent enactment of the Drug Quality and
Security Act to identify other areas to strengthen U.S. efforts
to combat the growing threat of counterfeit drugs to U.S.
patients. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Food and
Drug Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the
Government Accountability Office, the Health Care Research
Initiative at the William Davidson Institute, Pfizer Inc.,
Novartis Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, and Pew Charitable
Trusts.
Where Have All the Patients Gone? Examining the Psychiatric Bed
Shortage
On March 26, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Where Have All the
Patients Gone? Examining the Psychiatric Bed Shortage.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to explore the implications of the
nationwide shortage of inpatient psychiatric beds, including
the growing trend of patients requiring admission for
psychiatric care being boarded for extended periods of time in
emergency departments until an inpatient psychiatric bed
becomes available. The hearing also examined the impact of this
shortage on the seriously mentally ill. The Subcommittee
received testimony from parents of children with serious mental
illness, University of Massachusetts Medical School, New York
State Association of Chiefs of Police, Cook County Sheriff's
Office, Miami-Dade County Court Eleventh Judicial Circuit of
Florida, Georgetown Ministry Center, mental health educator and
advocate, American Mental Health Counselors Association, and
the Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual disAbility
Services.
Examining the Growing Problems of Prescription Drug and Heroin Abuse
On April 29, 2014, the Subcommittee Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Examining the Growing
Problems of Prescription Drug and Heroin Abuse.'' The purpose
of the hearing was to review the recent prescription drug and
heroin epidemic in the United States and why it has become an
urgent and growing public health crisis. The Subcommittee
received testimony from the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Office
of National Drug Control Policy, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and
the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
PPACA Enrollment and the Insurance Industry
On May 7, 2014, the Subcommittee Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``PPACA Enrollment and
the Insurance Industry.'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the implementation of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA), and, in particular, the status of
enrollment and the exchanges. The Subcommittee focused on the
industry's experience with respect to HealthCare.gov and
exchange enrollment, States' experiences with risk pools and
payment problems, and what consumers and patients can expect
regarding networks, doctor choices, and future premiums under
PPACA. The Subcommittee received testimony from Aetna, Cigna,
the Health Care Services Corporation, WellPoint, America's
Health Insurance Plans and the Blue Cross Blue Shield
Association.
Medicare Program Integrity: Screening Out Errors, Fraud, and Abuse
On June 25, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Medicare Program
Integrity: Screening Out Errors, Fraud, and Abuse.'' The
purpose of the hearing was the review key recommendations,
assess ongoing efforts, and identify additional actions that
could be taken or expedited to improve the Medicare program.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Office of Inspector General
at the Department of Health and Human Services, and the
Government Accountability Office.
Review of CDC Anthrax Lab Incident
On July 16, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Review of CDC Anthrax
Lab Incident.'' The hearing reviewed an incident at a
laboratory operated by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) that potentially exposed eighty-four CDC staff
to live anthrax. The purpose of the hearing was to analyze what
went wrong and recommendations to avoid future incidents. The
Subcommittee received testimony from CDC, the Department of
Agriculture, the Government Accountability Office, Behavioral-
Based Improvement Solutions, and a professor of Chemistry and
Chemical Biology at Rutgers University.
PPACA Implementation: Updates From CMS and GAO
On July 31, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation:
Updates from CMS and GAO.'' The hearing examined the
implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act and whether HealthCare.gov will be ready for the next
enrollment period. The Subcommittee received testimony from the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Government
Accountability Office.
Suicide Prevention and Treatment: Helping Loved Ones in Mental Health
Crisis
On September 18, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Suicide Prevention and
Treatment: Helping Loved Ones in Mental Health Crisis.'' The
hearing was part of the Subcommittee's ongoing examination of
Federal programs and resources devoted to mental health. The
Subcommittee received testimony from former member Lincoln
Diaz-Balart, the Acting Surgeon General, Professors from the
University of Pittsburgh and University of Arizona, and the
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.
Examining the U.S. Public Health Response to the Ebola Outbreak
On October 16, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Examining the U.S.
Public Health Response to the Ebola Outbreak.'' The hearing
examined the role of U.S. Public health agencies and their
efforts to prevent the spread of Ebola within the United
States. The Subcommittee received testimony from the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of
Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Biomedical
Advanced Research and Development Authority, the Customs and
Border Protection and Texas Health Resources.
Update on the U.S. Public Health Response to the Ebola Outbreak
On November 18, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Update on the U.S.
Public Health Response to the Ebola Outbreak.'' The hearing
examined the role of U.S. Public health agencies and their
domestic and international response to the Ebola outbreak. The
Subcommittee received testimony from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, the acting U.S. Surgeon General, the
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Samaritan's Purse, the
University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the Commissioner of
the Texas Department of State Health, on behalf of the
Association for State and Territorial Health Officials.
HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO ENERGY MATTERS
DOE Management and Oversight of its Nuclear Weapons Complex: Lessons of
the Y-12 Security Failure
On March 13, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``DOE Management and
Oversight of Its Nuclear Weapons Complex: Lessons of the Y-12
Security Failure.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine
the management and oversight deficiencies identified in the
wake of the July 28, 2012 security breakdown at the Y-12
National Security Complex to help determine what is necessary
to maintain the highest standards for safe and secure
operations at Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons
laboratories and production sites. The Subcommittee received
testimony from DOE, Carnegie Institution of Science, Air Force,
Government Accountability Office, and a former representative
of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Department of Energy Oversight: What is Necessary to Improve Project
Management and Mission Performance?
On July 24, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Department of Energy
Oversight: What is Necessary to Improve Project Management and
Mission Performance?'' The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the Secretary of Energy's plans for reorganizing the
Department of Energy's (DOE) management structure, with a focus
on how proposed changes will address key management and
performance challenges that confront the agency. The
Subcommittee received testimony from DOE and the Government
Accountability Office.
Department of Energy Oversight: Status of Clean Coal Programs
On February 11, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Department of Energy
Oversight: Status of Clean Coal Programs.'' The purpose of the
hearing was to review the status of the Department of Energy's
(DOE) Clean Coal Programs. In particular, the Committee
examined the research, development, demonstrations, and
timeframes to support the advancement of carbon capture and
sequestration technologies for potential future commercial
deployment. The Subcommittee received testimony from DOE and
the National Energy Technology Laboratory.
Department of Energy Oversight: Status of Loan Programs
On May 30, 2014, the Subcommittee Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Department of Energy
Oversight: Status of Loan Programs.'' The hearing examined
recent developments and the current status of the programs
managed by the Department of Energy (DOE) Loan Programs Office
(LPO). The Subcommittee received testimony from LPO, the
Inspector General for Audits and Inspections at DOE, and the
Government Accountability Office.
HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO CYBERSECURITY
MATTERS
Cyber Espionage and the Theft of U.S. Intellectual Property and
Technology
On July 9, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``Cyber Espionage and
the Theft of U.S. Intellectual Property and Technology.'' The
purpose of the hearing was to examine the steps taken by the
Federal government and the private sector to identify and
mitigate the effects of cyber espionage on American companies.
The Subcommittee received testimony from the Commission on the
Theft of American Intellectual Property, the U.S.-China
Economic and Security Review Commission, the Center for
Strategic and International Studies' Technology and Public
Policy Program, and the Government Accountability Office.
HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO JOBS AND THE
ECONOMY
The Impact of Patent Assertion Entities on Innovation and the Economy
On November 14, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``The Impact of Patent
Assertion Entities on Innovation and the Economy.'' The purpose
of the hearing was to investigate the recent trends in patent
assertion practices to gain a better understanding of their
impact on businesses, both large and small, and on fostering an
innovative marketplace. The hearing focused on the perspective
of companies that had received demand letters from patent
assertion entities and highlighted their related experiences in
advance of litigation. The Subcommittee received testimony from
the Texas Hotel and Lodging Association, Newegg, Inc., Public
Knowledge, University of California Hastings College of the
Law, White Castle System, Inc., and FindTheBest.com.
HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO ENERGY AND
ENVIRONMENT MATTERS
EPA's Regulatory Threat to Affordable, Reliable Energy
On October 29, 2013, the Subcommittee Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``EPA's Regulatory
Threat to Affordable, Reliable Energy: The Perspective of Coal
Communities.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from private
citizens, the Boilermakers Local 154, Citizens for Coal, the
Pennsylvania Coal Alliance, the Mayor of Braddock,
Pennsylvania, and the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO COMMERCE,
MANUFACTURING, AND TRADE
The GM Ignition Switch Recall: Why Did It Take So Long?
On April 1, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``The GM Ignition Switch
Recall: Why Did It Take So Long?'' The purpose of this hearing
was to review the recall by the General Motors Company (GM) of
over 2 million cars in the United States for problems related
to the ignition switch. The Subcommittee examined how GM and
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
responded to complaints from customers about the ignition
switch and non-deployment of air bags. The Subcommittee
received testimony from GM and NHTSA.
The GM Ignition Switch Recall: Investigation Update
On June 18, 2014, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations held a hearing entitled ``The GM Ignition Switch
Recall: Investigation Update.'' The hearing focused on the
facts and circumstances that contributed to General Motors'
(GM) failure to identify a safety defect in certain ignition
switches and initiate a recall in a timely manner. The
Subcommittee received testimony from GM and Anton R. Valukas of
Jenner & Block, who conducted GM's internal investigation
regarding the ignition switch.
HEARINGS HELD
Hearing entitled ``Influenza: Perspective on Current Season
and Update on Preparedness.'' (February 13, 2013) Serial Number
113-3.
Hearing entitled ``DOE Management and Oversight of Its
Nuclear Weapons Complex: Lessons of the Y-12 Security
Failure.'' (March 13, 2013) Serial Number 113-13.
Hearing entitled ``Health Information Technologies:
Administration Perspectives on Innovation and Regulation.''
(March 21, 2013) Serial Number 113-22.
Hearing entitled ``A Continuing Investigation into the
Fungal Meningitis Outbreak and Whether It Could Have Been
Prevented.'' (April 16, 2013) Serial Number 113-31.
Hearing entitled ``The Center for Consumer Information and
Insurance Oversight and the Implementation of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act.'' (April 24, 2013) Serial
Number 113-34.
Hearing entitled ``Does HIPAA Help or Hinder Patient Care
and Public Safety?'' (April 26, 2013) Serial Number 113-37.
Hearing entitled ``Health Insurance Premiums Under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.'' (May 20, 2013)
Serial Number 113-44.
Hearing entitled ``Examining SAMHSA's Role in Delivering
Services to the Severely Mentally Ill.'' (May 22, 2013) Serial
Number 113-47.
Hearing entitled ``Continuing Concerns Over BioWatch and
the Surveillance of Bioterrorism.'' (June 18, 2013) Serial
Number 113-56.
Hearing entitled ``Challenges Facing America's Businesses
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.'' (June
26, 2013) Serial Number 113-60.
Hearing entitled ``Cyber Espionage and the Theft of U.S.
Intellectual Property and Technology.'' (July 9, 2013) Serial
Number 113-67.
Hearing entitled ``Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act: Implementation in the Wake of Administrative Delay.''
(July 18, 2013) Serial Number 113-72.
Hearing entitled ``Department of Energy Oversight: What is
Necessary to Improve Project Management and Mission
Performance?'' (July 24, 2013) Serial Number 113-76.
Hearing entitled ``Two Weeks Until Enrollment: Questions
for CCIIO.'' (September 19, 2013) Serial Number 113-84.
Hearing entitled ``EPA's Regulatory Threat to Affordable,
Reliable Energy: The Perspective of Coal Communities.''
(October 29, 2013) Serial Number 113-89.
Hearing entitled ``The Impact of Patent Assertion Entities
on Innovation and the Economy.'' (November 14, 2013) Serial
Number 113-96.
Hearing entitled ``Security of HealthCare.gov.'' (November
19, 2013) Serial Number 113-100.
Hearing entitled ``2014: Seeking PPACA Answers.'' (January
16, 2014) Serial Number 113-113.
Hearing entitled ``Department of Energy Oversight: Status
of Clean Coal Programs.'' (February 11, 2014) Serial Number
113-118.
Hearing entitled ``Counterfeit Drugs: Fighting Illegal
Supply Chains.'' (February 27, 2014) Serial Number 113-120.
Hearing entitled ``Where Have All the Patients Gone?
Examining the Psychiatric Bed Shortage.'' (March 26, 2014)
Serial Number 113-130.
Hearing entitled ``The GM Ignition Switch Recall: Why Did
It Take So Long?'' (April 1, 2014) Serial Number 113-131.
Hearing entitled ``Examining the Growing Problem of
Prescription Drug and Heroin Abuse.'' (April 29, 2014) Serial
Number 113-140.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Enrollment and the Insurance
Industry.'' (May 7, 2014) Serial Number 113-144.
Hearing entitled ``Department of Energy Oversight: Status
of Loan Programs.'' (May 30, 2014) Serial Number 113-150.
Hearing entitled ``The GM Ignition Switch Recall:
Investigation Update.'' (June 18, 2014) Serial Number 113-154.
Hearing entitled ``Medicare Program Integrity: Screening
Out Errors, Fraud, and Abuse.'' (June 25, 2014) Serial Number
113-156.
Hearing entitled ``Review of CDC Anthrax Lab Incident.''
(July 16, 2014) Serial Number 113-160.
Hearing entitled ``PPACA Implementation: Updates from CMS
and GAO.'' (July 31, 2014) Serial Number 113-170.
Hearing entitled ``Suicide Prevention and Treatment:
Helping Loved Ones in Mental Health Crisis.'' (September 18,
2014) Serial Number 113-177.
Hearing entitled ``Examining the U.S. Public Health
Response to the Ebola Outbreak.'' (October 16, 2014) Serial
Number 113-179.
Hearing entitled ``Update on the U.S. Public Health
Response to the Ebola Outbreak.'' (November 18, 2014) Serial
Number 113-180.
Oversight Plan for the Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of
Representatives, 113th Congress
During the 113th Congress, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce will hold hearings and conduct rigorous oversight over
matters within its jurisdiction. The Committee will conduct
thorough oversight, reach conclusions based on an objective
review of the facts, and treat witnesses fairly. The Committee
will request information in a responsible manner that is
calculated to be helpful to the Committee in its oversight
responsibilities. The Committee's oversight functions will
focus on: 1) cutting government spending through the
elimination of waste, fraud, and abuse and 2) ensuring laws are
adequate to protect the public interest or are being
implemented in a manner that protects the public interest,
without stifling economic growth.
HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE ISSUES
PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
In the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to
examine issues related to the Department of Health and Human
Services implementation of Public Law 111-148, The Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and the related
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public
Law 111-152. This will include the numerous provisions
contained within the law that affect the private insurance
market in the United States, the creation of health insurance
exchanges, and the operation of those exchanges by either the
states or the Federal government. The Committee will also
examine the regulations and requirements imposed on both small
and large businesses, and the law's effects on individuals.
The Committee will also evaluate what controls are in place
to prevent bias, waste, fraud, and abuse in the management of
PPACA and its programs. The Committee will monitor deadlines
imposed on HHS by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act and examine what procedures HHS has in place for meeting
those deadlines and/or complying with missed deadlines. The
Committee will examine what programs HHS has in place to
improve the availability of reliable, consumer-oriented
information on the cost and quality of health care goods,
services, and providers. The Committee will also examine the
status and future of employer-sponsored health care plans as
well as the effects of PPACA's enactment on the states. The
Committee will examine the impact of PPACA and its implementing
regulations on the economy, consumers, and the health care
industry as well as the process by which those regulations are
drafted.
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
The Committee will review the management, operations, and
activity of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) and the programs it administers. The Committee will
examine and review Medicare and Medicaid management and
activity as it relates to ongoing Committee efforts to prevent
bias, waste, fraud, and abuse in Federal health care programs,
particularly in the implementation of PPACA. The Committee will
investigate the process by which CMS implements statutory
formulas to set prices for Medicare payment, as well as the
effectiveness of those formulas. The Committee will evaluate
the competitive bidding process for durable medical equipment
and examine ways to use similar programs in Medicare and
Medicare Advantage plans. The Committee will examine the
effects that the Medicaid expansion included in PPACA will have
on state budgets, the budgets of individuals and families, the
budgets of providers currently providing uncompensated care,
and the impact it may have on access to health insurance and
health care. The Committee will investigate the processes by
which CMS prevents bias, waste, fraud, and abuse in the award
of government contracts.
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND DRUG SAFETY
The Committee will review whether the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is ensuring that regulated drugs are safe,
effective, and available to American patients in an expeditious
fashion. The Committee will also explore the interplay between
these policies and drug innovation, both in the United States
and abroad. Further, the Committee will examine FDA's
enforcement of current drug safety laws and the issues involved
in protecting the nation's supply chains against economically
motivated and other forms of adulteration. The Committee will
continue its investigation of FDA's handling of the 2012 fungal
meningitis outbreak linked to contaminated, compounded drugs.
PUBLIC HEALTH
The Committee will examine the roles of various Federal
agencies involved in insuring and protecting the public health,
including the implementation and management of these programs.
In particular, the Committee will review Federal efforts on
mental health and pandemic preparedness, including influenza
preparedness.
TOBACCO
The Committee will examine the implementation of the 2009
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, including
regulatory actions by the Food and Drug Administration.
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ISSUES
NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY
During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine
issues relating to national energy policy, including U.S.
policies that relate to production, supply, and consumption of
electricity, oil and natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power,
nuclear power, hydraulic fracturing, and renewable energy. The
Committee will examine the impact of government policies and
programs on the exploration, production, and development of
domestic energy resources, including issues relating to the
nation's current energy infrastructure. The Committee will also
continue to examine safety and security issues relating to
energy exploration, production and distribution.
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
The Committee will review Federal electricity policies of
the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) to ensure that those policies
promote competitive wholesale power markets, transmission, and
generation infrastructure upgrades, and compliance with
relevant statutes. It will also examine the activities of the
DOE and FERC relating to electric industry restructuring,
protection of consumers, and the development of efficient and
vigorous wholesale markets for electricity.
MANAGEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ITS NATIONAL LABORATORIES
The Committee will oversee management and operations issues
at the Department of Energy (DOE), including oversight,
management, and operations of the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) and the national laboratories. The
Committee's oversight work will include a review of the
implementation of security and safety reforms at NNSA and DOE
facilities, ongoing safety and security matters, the Office of
Environmental Management's cleanup program, and DOE's
implementation of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
YUCCA MOUNTAIN
The Committee will examine the financial and other
implications of DOE's decision to abandon licensing for Yucca
Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, and the potential
impact of this action on the future of nuclear energy in the
United States. The Committee will also continue to examine the
actions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in
connection with its obligations under the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act.
THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
The Committee will review the activities of the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. The Committee will examine NRC's budget
requests and conduct oversight of the manner in which the
Commission discharges its various responsibilities, including
licensing activity, the safety and security of nuclear power
facilities, and the agency's post-Fukushima regulatory changes.
CLEAN AIR ACT
The Committee will continue to review significant
rulemakings under the Clean Air Act and the potential economic
and job impacts of those rulemakings on the energy,
manufacturing and construction industries and other critical
sectors of the U.S. economy, as well as any public health and
environmental benefits of the regulations. The Committee's
review will include oversight of the Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) decisions, strategies and actions to meet Clean
Air Act standards, and the current role of cost, employment and
feasibility considerations in Clean Air Act rulemakings.
CLIMATE CHANGE
The Committee will continue to monitor international
negotiations on efforts to control greenhouse gas emissions in
connection with concerns about global climate change. In
addition, the Committee will examine the EPA's efforts to
regulate domestic greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air
Act based on its endangerment finding. The Committee will
consider whether such agreements and regulatory efforts are
scientifically well grounded. The Committee will also review
the activities undertaken in this area by the Department of
Energy (DOE), the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), and other agencies within the Committee's jurisdiction,
including efforts to prepare for and respond to weather events
and natural disasters in the future.
EPA MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
The Committee intends to conduct general oversight of the
EPA, including review of the agency's funding decisions,
resource allocation, grants, research activities, enforcement
actions, relations with State and local governments, public
transparency, and respect for economic, procedural, public
health, and environmental standards in regulatory actions. The
oversight will also include EPA program management and
implementation, including efforts to reduce fraud and abuse in
the renewable fuels program.
INVESTMENT IN THE GREEN ENERGY SECTOR
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, or the
stimulus) provided $84.6 billion in new spending for the green
energy sector, as well as $21.6 billion in tax credits for
energy, transport, and climate science. The Committee will
continue to review how this money was spent; the development of
new technologies, products, and businesses focused on green
energy; and how this spending has impacted the domestic
suppliers or manufacturers of alternative energy products.
COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY ISSUES
A MODERN COMMUNICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR THE INNOVATION AGE
The Committee will exercise its jurisdiction over wired and
wireless communications to ensure our nation's policies
governing voice, video, audio and data services are promoting
investment, innovation and job creation. The country's current
regulatory regime takes a siloed approach in which different
technological platforms--such as wireline, wireless, broadcast,
cable, and satellite--are regulated differently based on
regulations that may be decades old. As we move deeper into the
Internet era, however, providers are increasingly using these
platforms to offer the same or similar services. The committee
will examine whether these regulations should be updated to
better meet the communications needs of the country and ensure
its citizen enjoy cutting edge services, as well as the
economic benefits they bring.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
During the 113th Congress, the Committee will conduct
oversight of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),
including the effect of the FCC's decisions on innovation and
the U.S. economy. Among other things, the Committee will
evaluate the impact generally of FCC actions on voice, video,
audio, and data services, and on public safety. The Committee
will pay particular attention to whether the FCC conducts cost-
benefit and market analyses before imposing regulations. The
Committee will also conduct oversight to improve FCC procedures
and transparency.
SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
The Committee will conduct oversight of the Federal
Communications Commission's and the National Telecommunications
and Information Administration's (NTIA) management and
allocation of the nation's spectrum for commercial and
government use. Spectrum is increasingly being used to provide
voice, video, audio, and data services to consumers. The
Committee will evaluate spectrum-management policies to ensure
efficient use of the public airwaves for innovative
communications services. The Committee will also examine
whether plans for allocating spectrum maximizes broadband
deployment and encourages investment. The Committee will pay
particular attention to FCC and NTIA implementation of the
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, which is
intended to make more spectrum available for mobile broadband
services as well as raise as much as $7 billion in spectrum
auction proceeds to help build a nationwide, interoperable
public safety broadband network.
BROADBAND
The Committee will investigate whether regulatory policies
are helping or hindering broadband deployment. For example, the
Committee will conduct oversight of the $7 billion dollars
allocated by the ARRA to the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration and the Rural Utility Service (RUS)
for broadband grants and loans. In particular, the Committee
will examine what procedures are in place to control waste,
fraud, and abuse of broadband stimulus funds, whether the funds
were appropriately targeted, and the impact of the funding on
jobs and the economy.
INTERNET GOVERNANCE
The Committee will exercise its jurisdiction over wired and
wireless communications to ensure continued growth and
investment in the Internet. In particular, the Committee will
monitor efforts to replace the successful multi-stakeholder
model of Internet governance--in which non-governmental
entities develop best practices for the management of Internet
networks and content--with regulation.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS
The Committee will examine whether the communications needs
of first responders are being met. The Committee will examine
the progress being made to ensure that first responders have
interoperable communications capabilities with local, state,
and Federal public safety officials. The Committee will also
consider whether first responders have an adequate amount of
spectrum for voice, video, and data transmissions. In addition,
the Committee will conduct oversight regarding the
implementation of legacy 911 and Next Generation 911 (NG911)
services. NG911 relies on IP-based architecture rather than the
PSTN-based architecture of legacy 911 to provide an expanded
array of emergency communications services that encompass both
the core functionalities of legacy E911 and additional
functionalities that take advantage of the enhanced
capabilities of IP-based devices and networks.
COMMERCE, MANUFACTURING, AND TRADE ISSUES
PRIVACY AND DATA SECURITY
In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine issues
relating to the privacy and security of information and data
collected by businesses about consumers and the potential for
improving protection without undercutting innovative uses that
benefit consumers and the economy. Further, the Committee will
continue to review the manner in which fraud and other criminal
issues affect e-commerce.
MANUFACTURING AND TRADE
The Committee will explore the state of manufacturing in
the United States to identify factors that are hampering or
furthering U.S. competitiveness. The Committee will review the
issues presented by the globalization of production and
manufacturing networks, including the integrity of products and
components assembled overseas and the impact on national
security.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
The Committee will conduct oversight of the Commerce
Department and complementary or conflicting Federal efforts to
promote U.S. manufacturing, exports, and trade, including
efforts to lower or eliminate non-tariff barriers and harmonize
regulation of products sold internationally where other
countries share our health, safety, and consumer protection
goals.
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
The Committee will continue oversight of the CPSC and its
implementation and enforcement of laws and regulations relating
to the safety of consumer products, including the agency's
implementation of Public Law No. 112-28 and determination of
priorities.
NHTSA MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
The Committee intends to conduct oversight of the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including the costs and
benefits of its regulations, research activities,
investigations, and enforcement actions pertaining to motor
vehicle and motor coach safety.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
The Committee will conduct oversight of the Federal Trade
Commission's management and operations, including the impact of
its decisions and actions on the general public and the
business community, its determination of priorities and the
need, if any, for refinement of its authorities.
MISCELLANEOUS
CYBERSECURITY
The Committee will exercise its jurisdiction over
cybersecurity to ensure the country is well protected while at
the same time avoiding one-size-fits all approaches that hinder
the flexibility of commercial and governmental actors need to
combat the rapidly evolving threats. The Committee will also
review the efforts of agencies within its jurisdiction to
secure their networks consistent with the Homeland Security Act
of 2002. This Act included a separate legislative provision
entitled the Federal Information Security Management Act, which
reauthorized and enhanced a government-wide cyber security
program under the direction of the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
STIMULUS SPENDING
In the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to
monitor issues of waste, fraud, abuse, and effectiveness of
spending related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment.
BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE
The Committee continues its investigation of the BioWatch
program, the nation's first early detection and warning
capability for biological attacks, and its impact on the
nation's public health system. Among the goals of this
investigation are to determine how the BioWatch program is
performing and whether it is meeting public protection goals.
The Committee will continue to review the implementation of the
Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 by HHS, and the extent of the coordination
between HHS and the Department of Homeland Security.
FEDERAL OVERSIGHT OF HIGH-CONTAINMENT BIO LABORATORIES
The Committee will examine issues related to high-
containment bio laboratories, which handle some of the world's
most exotic and dangerous diseases, including anthrax,
smallpox, foot and mouth disease and Ebola virus. Among the
issues under review are whether Federal plans or efforts to
oversee high-containment bio laboratories are adequate, and
whether some of these efforts are duplicative and overlapping.
ANTI-TERRORISM SECURITY FOR CHEMICAL FACILITIES
The Committee will continue its oversight of the Department
of Homeland Security's implementation of the Chemical
Facilities Anti-Terrorism Program, originally authorized in
Section 550 of P.L. 109-295, the Homeland Security
Appropriations Act of 2007. The Committee will continue to
examine whether taxpayer funds are spent prudently and the
extent to which the Department is advancing the purpose of
securing chemical facilities against terrorist threats.
GOVERNMENT SCIENTIFIC AND RISK ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS
During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine
issues relating to the numerous Federal science programs
assessing public health risks, including the Integrated Risk
Information System at the Environmental Protection Agency, the
Report on Carcinogens produced by the National Toxicology
Program at the Department of Health and Human Services, and
assessments proposed or ongoing in other Federal departments
and agencies. The Committee will review programs to assess the
objectives, transparency, and integrity of scientific
assessments that inform regulatory and public health policies.
CONTROLLING SPENDING
The Committee will examine Departments and agencies under
its jurisdiction to assure adequate and prompt implementation
of recommendations from the Administration, the Offices of
Inspectors General, the GAO or other sources to achieve cost
savings or eliminate wasteful spending.
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
In June 2006, the Bush Administration issued a National
Infrastructure Protection Plan. This plan created a process by
which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is to identify
critical assets and assess their vulnerabilities and risks due
to loss or natural disaster. During the 113th Congress, the
Committee will review the Department's activities with respect
to identifying high-priority assets and implementing plans to
protect these assets in areas within the Committee's
jurisdiction.
NUCLEAR SMUGGLING
The Committee will continue to monitor Federal government
and private sector efforts at border crossings, seaports, and
mail facilities. The Committee's review will analyze and assess
Customs' and DOE's efforts and the utility of equipment aimed
at detecting and preventing the smuggling of dangerous
commerce, particularly nuclear and radiological weapons of mass
destruction.
PUBLIC LAWS
This list includes: (1) legislation on which the Committee
on Energy and Commerce acted directly, (2) legislation
developed through Committee participation in House-Senate
conferences, and (3) legislation which included provisions
within the Committee's jurisdiction, including legislation
enacted by reference as part of other legislation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Serial No. Date Approved Bill Title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-5................................ 3/13/2013.............. H.R. 307............... Pandemic and All-
Hazards Preparedness
Reauthorization Act of
2013
113-14............................... 6/13/2013.............. S. 622, H.R. 1407, H.R. Animal Drug and Animal
1408. Generic Drug User Fee
Reauthorization Act of
2013
113-23............................... 8/9/2013............... H.R. 267............... Hydropower Regulatory
Efficiency Act of 2013
113-30............................... 8/9/2013............... H.R. 2576.............. To amend title 49,
United States Code, to
modify requirements
relating to the
availability of
pipeline safety
regulatory documents,
and for other purposes
113-48............................... 11/13/2013............. H.R. 2094.............. School Access to
Emergency Epinephrine
Act
113-51............................... 11/21/2013............. S.330, H.R. 698........ HIV Organ Policy Equity
Act
113-54............................... 11/27/2013............. H.R. 3204, H.R. 1919, Drug Quality and
H.R. 3089. Security Act,
Safeguarding America's
Pharmaceuticals Act of
2013, Compounding
Clarity Act of 2013
113-55............................... 11/27/2013............. S.252, H.R. 541, S. PREEMIE Reauthorization
1561, H.R. 225. Act, CHIMP Act
Amendments of 2013,
National Pediatric
Research Network Act
of 2013
113-64............................... 12/20/2013............. H.R. 3588.............. Community Fire Safety
Act of 2013
113-67............................... 12/26/2013............. H.J.Res. 59............ Bipartisan Budget Act
of 2013
113-68............................... 12/26/2013............. H.R. 623............... Alaska Native Tribal
Health Consortium Land
Transfer Act
113-77............................... 1/24/2014.............. H.R. 3527.............. Poison Center Network
Act
113-93............................... 4/1/2014............... H.R. 4302, H.R. 846, Protecting Access to
H.R. 2995, H.R. 1263. Medicare Act of 2014,
Diagnostic Imaging
Services Access
Protection Act of
2013, Unnecessary Cap
Act of 2013,
Excellence in Mental
Health Act
113-94............................... 4/3/2014............... H.R. 2019.............. Gabriella Miller Kids
First Research Act
113-98............................... 4/7/2014............... S. 1557, H.R. 297...... Children's Hospital GME
Support
Reauthorization Act of
2013
113-109.............................. 6/9/2014............... H.R. 724............... To amend the Clean Air
Act to remove the
requirement for dealer
certification of new
light-duty motor
vehicles
113-122.............................. 6/30/2014.............. H.R. 316............... Collinsville Renewable
Energy Production Act
113-125.............................. 6/30/2014.............. S. 2086................ Reliable Home Heating
Act
113-128.............................. 7/22/2014.............. H.R. 803............... Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act
113-143.............................. 8/1/2014............... H.R. 1528.............. Veterinary Medicine
Mobility Act of 2013
113-152.............................. 8/8/2014............... H.R. 3548.............. Improving Trauma Care
Act of 2013
113-157.............................. 8/8/2014............... H.R. 4631.............. Combating Autism
Reauthorization Act of
2014
113-166.............................. 9/26/2014.............. H.R. 594............... Paul D. Wellstone
Muscular Dystrophy
Community Assistance,
Research and Education
Amendments of 2014
113-177.............................. 9/26/2014.............. S. 276................. A bill to reinstate and
extend the deadline
for commencement of
construction of a
hydroelectric project
involving the American
Falls Reservoir
113-180.............................. 9/26/2014.............. S. 2154, H.R. 4290..... Emergency Medical
Services for Children
Reauthorization Act of
2014
113-195.............................. 11/26/2014............. S. 2141, H.R. 4250..... Sunscreen Innovation
Act
113-196.............................. 11/26/2014............. S. 2539, H.R. 1098..... Traumatic Brain Injury
Reauthorization Act of
2014
113-197.............................. 11/26/2014............. S. 2583, H.R. 5161..... E-LABEL Act
113-198.............................. 12/4/2014.............. H.R. 4067.............. A bill to provide for
the extension of the
enforcement
instruction on
supervision
requirements for
outpatient therapeutic
services in critical
access and small rural
hospitals through 2014
113-200.............................. 12/4/2014.............. H.R. 5728, H.R. 4572, STELA Reauthorization
S. 2799. Act of 2014, STELA
Reauthorization Act of
2014, Satellite
Television Access and
Viewer Rights Act
113-233.............................. 12/16/2014............. S. 2917................ Adding Ebola to the FDA
Priority Review
Voucher Program Act
113-235.............................. 12/16/2014............. H.R. 83, H.R. 4450..... To require the
Secretary of the
Interior to assemble a
team of technical,
policy, and financial
experts to address the
energy needs of the
insular areas of the
United States and the
Freely Associated
States through the
development of action
plans aimed at
reducing reliance on
imported fossil fuels
and increasing use of
indigenous clean-
energy resources, and
for other purposes,
Travel Promotion,
Enhancement, and
Modernization Act of
2014
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 669............... Sudden Unexpected Death
Data Enhancement and
Awareness Act
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 1281.............. Newborn Screening Saves
Lives Reauthorization
Act of 2013
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 4007.............. Protecting and Securing
Chemical Facilities
from Terrorist Attacks
Act of 2014
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 4771.............. Designer Anabolic
Steroid Control Act of
2014
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 5057.............. EPS Service Parts Act
of 2014
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 5185.............. EARLY Act
Reauthorization of
2014
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. H.R. 5705.............. Propane Education and
Research Enhancement
Act of 2014
113-__............................... 12/18/2014............. S. 2338................ United States Anti-
Doping Agency
Reauthorization Act
113-__............................... 12/19/2014............. H.R. 5771, H.R. 647.... Tax Increase Prevention
Act of 2014, Achieving
a Better Life
Experience (ABLE) Act
of 2013
113-__............................... 12/19/2014............. H.R. 2754.............. Collectible Coin
Protection Act
113-__............................... 12/19/2014............. S. 2673, H.R. 938, H.R. United States-Israel
3683. Strategic Partnership
Act of 2014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEARINGS HELD PURSUANT TO CLAUSES 2(n), (o), OR (p) OF RULE XI
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Serial No. Hearing Title Hearing Date(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-6......................... SGR: Data, Measures February 14,
and Models; Building 2013
a Future Medicare
Physician Payment
System. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-9......................... Is the Broadband February 27,
Stimulus Working? 2013
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-10........................ Fostering Innovation February 27,
to Fight Waste, Fraud 2013
and Abuse in Health
Care. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-13........................ DOE Management and March 13, 2013
Oversight of Its
Nuclear Weapons
Complex: Lessons of
the Y-12 Security
Failure.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-15........................ The Chemical March 14, 2013
Facilities Anti-
terrorism Standards
(CFATS) Program: A
Progress Update.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-16........................ Oversight of FirstNet March 14, 2013
and Emergency
Communications.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-28........................ Strengthening Medicare April 11, 2013
for Seniors:
Understanding the
Challenges of
Traditional
Medicare's Benefit
Design. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-33........................ A Financial Review of April 18, 2013
the Department of
Health and Human
Services and Its FY
2014 Budget.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-34........................ The Center for April 24, 2013
Consumer Information
and Insurance
Oversight and the
Implementation of the
Patient Protection
and Affordable Care
Act. (Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-35........................ Securing Our Nation's April 25, 2013
Prescription Drug
Supply Chain.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-36........................ The Lifeline Fund: April 25, 2013
Money Well Spent?
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-45........................ Cyber Threats and May 21, 2013
Security Solutions.
(Full Committee).
113-46........................ Cybersecurity: An May 21, 2013
Examination of the
Communications Supply
Chain. (Subcommittee
on Communications and
Technology).
113-50........................ Reforming SGR: June 5, 2013
Prioritizing Quality
in a Modernized
Physician Payment
System. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-51........................ The Need for Medicaid June 12, 2013
Reform: A State
Perspective.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-54........................ Title I of the Toxic June 13, 2013
Substance Control
Act: Understanding
its History and
Reviewing its Impact.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-55........................ Examining the Federal June 14, 2013
Government's Response
to the Prescription
Drug Abuse Crisis.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-56........................ Continuing Concerns June 18, 2013
Over BioWatch and the
Surveillance of
Bioterrorism.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-59........................ A 21st Century June 26, 2013
Medicare: Bipartisan
Proposals to Redesign
the Program's
Outdated Benefit
Structure.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-64........................ Examining Reforms to June 28, 2013
Improve the Medicare
Part B Drug Program
for Seniors.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-65........................ Making Medicaid Work July 8, 2013
for the Most
Vulnerable.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-67........................ Cyber Espionage and July 9, 2013
the Theft of U.S.
Intellectual Property
and Technology.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-68........................ Regulation of New July 11, 2013
Chemicals, Protection
of Confidential
Business Information,
and Innovation.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-76........................ Department of Energy July 24, 2013
Oversight: What is
Necessary to Improve
Project Management
and Mission
Performance?
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-82........................ The Obama September 18,
Administration's 2013
Climate Change
Policies and
Activities.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-83........................ Regulation of Existing September 18,
Chemicals and the 2013
Role of Pre-emption
under Sections 6 and
18 of the Toxic
Substances Control
Act. (Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-87........................ PPACA Implementation October 24, 2013
Failures: Didn't Know
or Didn't Disclose?
(Full Committee).
113-90........................ PPACA Implementation October 30, 2013
Failures: Answers
from HHS. (Full
Committee).
113-95........................ Obamacare November 14,
Implementation 2013
Problems: More than
Just a Broken
Website.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-98........................ Reviewing FDA's November 15,
Implementation of 2013
FDASIA. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-100....................... Security of November 19,
HealthCare.gov. 2013
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-103....................... Oversight of FirstNet November 21,
and the Advancement 2013
of Public Safety
Wireless
Communications.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-105....................... Medicare Advantage: December 4, 2013
What Beneficiaries
Should Expect Under
the President's
Health Care Plan.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-108....................... PPACA Implementation December 11,
Failures: What's 2013
Next? (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-109....................... Oversight of the December 12,
Federal 2013
Communications
Commission.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-110....................... Oversight of NRC December 12,
Management and the 2013
Need for Legislative
Reform. (Subcommittee
on Environment and
the Economy and
Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-113....................... 2014: Seeking PPACA January 16, 2014
Answers.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-119....................... Messing with Success: February 26,
How CMS' Attack on 2014
the Part D Program
Will Increase Costs
and Reduce Choices
for Seniors.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-137....................... Improving April 7, 2014
Predictability and
Transparency in DEA
and FDA Regulation.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-143....................... The NRC FY 2015 Budget May 7, 2014
and Policy Issues.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-150....................... Department of Energy May 30, 2014
Oversight: Status of
Loan Programs.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-156....................... Medicare Program June 25, 2014
Integrity: Screening
Out Errors, Fraud,
and Abuse.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-160....................... Review of CDC Anthrax July 16, 2014
Lab Incident.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-161....................... Failure to Verify: July 16, 2014
Concerns Regarding
PPACA's Eligibility
System. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-170....................... PPACA Implementation: July 31, 2014
Updates from CMS and
GAO. (Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-175....................... Oversight of FCC September 17,
Budget and 2014
Management.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRINTED HEARINGS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Serial No. Hearing Title Hearing Date(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-1......................... American Energy February 5, 2013
Security and
Innovation: An
Assessment of North
America's Energy
Resources.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-2......................... Fighting for Internet February 5, 2013
Freedom: Dubai and
Beyond. (Subcommittee
on Communications and
Technology and
Committee on Foreign
Affairs).
113-3......................... Influenza: Perspective February 13,
on Current Season and 2013
Update on
Preparedness.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-4......................... Satellite Video 101. February 13,
(Subcommittee on 2013
Communications and
Technology).
113-5......................... Our Nation of February 14,
Builders: 2013
Manufacturing in
America.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-6......................... SGR: Data, Measures February 14,
and Models; Building 2013
a Future Medicare
Physician Payment
System. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-7......................... The Role of the States February 15,
in Protecting the 2013
Environment Under
Current Law.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-8......................... American Energy February 26,
Security and 2013
Innovation: An
Assessment of Private-
Sector Successes and
Opportunities in
Energy Efficient
Technologies.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-9......................... Is the Broadband February 27,
Stimulus Working? 2013
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-10........................ Fostering Innovation February 27,
to Fight Waste, Fraud 2013
and Abuse in Health
Care. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-11........................ The Nuclear Regulatory February 28,
Commission: Policy 2013
and Governance
Challenges.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy and
Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-12........................ American Energy March 5, 2013
Security and
Innovation: The Role
of a Diverse
Electricity
Generation Portfolio.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-13........................ DOE Management and March 13, 2013
Oversight of Its
Nuclear Weapons
Complex: Lessons of
the Y-12 Security
Failure.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-14........................ Obamacare's Impact on March 13, 2013
Jobs. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-15........................ The Chemical March 14, 2013
Facilities Anti-
terrorism Standards
(CFATS) Program: A
Progress Update.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-16........................ Oversight of FirstNet March 14, 2013
and Emergency
Communications.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-17........................ Unaffordable: Impact March 15, 2013
of Obamacare on
Americans' Health
Insurance Premiums.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-18........................ Saving Seniors and Our March 18, 2013
Most Vulnerable
Citizens from an
Entitlement Crisis.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-19........................ American Energy March 19, 2013
Security and
Innovation: The Role
of Regulators and
Grid Operators in
Meeting Natural Gas
and Electric
Coordination
Challenges.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-20........................ Health Information March 19, 2013
Technologies:
Harnessing Wireless
Innovation.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-21........................ Health Information March 20, 2013
Technologies: How
Innovation Benefits
Patients.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-22........................ Health Information March 21, 2013
Technologies:
Administration
Perspectives on
Innovation and
Regulation.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-23........................ Our Nation of March 21, 2013
Builders: The
Strength of Steel.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-24........................ Protecting America's April 3, 2013
Sick and Chronically
Ill. (Subcommittee on
Health).
113-25........................ Reauthorization of April 9, 2013
Animal Drug User
Fees: ADUFA and
AGDUFA. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-26........................ H.R. 3, the ``Northern April 10, 2013
Route Approval Act.''
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-27........................ Our Nation of April 10, 2013
Builders: Powering
U.S. Automobile
Manufacturing
Forward.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-28........................ Strengthening Medicare April 11, 2013
for Seniors:
Understanding the
Challenges of
Traditional
Medicare's Benefit
Design. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-29........................ H.R. __, the ``Coal April 11, 2013
Ash Recycling and
Oversight Act of
2013.'' (Subcommittee
on Environment and
the Economy).
113-30........................ Discussion draft of April 12, 2013
the Energy Consumers
Relief Act of 2013.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-31........................ A Continuing April 16, 2013
Investigation into
the Fungal Meningitis
Outbreak and Whether
It Could Have Been
Prevented.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-32........................ Discussion Draft of April 18, 2013
H.R. __, the Global
Investment in
American Jobs Act of
2013. (Subcommittee
on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-33........................ A Financial Review of April 18, 2013
the Department of
Health and Human
Services and Its FY
2014 Budget.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-34........................ The Center for April 24, 2013
Consumer Information
and Insurance
Oversight and the
Implementation of the
Patient Protection
and Affordable Care
Act. (Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-35........................ Securing Our Nation's April 25, 2013
Prescription Drug
Supply Chain.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-36........................ The Lifeline Fund: April 25, 2013
Money Well Spent?
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-37........................ Does HIPAA Help or April 26, 2013
Hinder Patient Care
and Public Safety?
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-38........................ U.S. Energy Abundance: May 7, 2013
Exports and the
Changing Global
Energy Landscape.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-39........................ Vacation Nation: How May 7, 2013
Tourism Benefits Our
Economy.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-40........................ American Energy May 9, 2013
Security and
Innovation: Grid
Reliability
Challenges in a
Shifting Energy
Resource Landscape.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-41........................ Fraud on the Elderly: May 16, 2013
A Growing Concern for
a Growing Population.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-42........................ The Fiscal Year 2014 May 16, 2013
Environmental
Protection Agency
Budget. (Subcommittee
on Environment and
the Economy and
Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-43........................ Three legislative May 17, 2013,
proposals entitled May 22, 2013
the ``Federal and
State Partnership for
Environmental
Protection Act of
2013;'' the
``Reducing Excessive
Deadline Obligations
Act of 2013;'' and
the ``Federal
Facility
Accountability Act of
2013.'' (Subcommittee
on Environment and
the Economy).
113-44........................ Health Insurance May 20, 2013
Premiums Under the
Patient Protection
and Affordable Care
Act. (Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-45........................ Cyber Threats and May 21, 2013
Security Solutions.
(Full Committee).
113-46........................ Cybersecurity: An May 21, 2013
Examination of the
Communications Supply
Chain. (Subcommittee
on Communications and
Technology).
113-47........................ Examining SAMHSA's May 22, 2013
Role in Delivering
Services to the
Severely Mentally
Ill. (Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-48........................ Examining Drug May 23, 2013
Compounding.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-49........................ Our Nation of June 4, 2013
Builders: Home
Economics.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-50........................ Reforming SGR: June 5, 2013
Prioritizing Quality
in a Modernized
Physician Payment
System. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-51........................ The Need for Medicaid June 12, 2013
Reform: A State
Perspective.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-52........................ The Satellite June 12, 2013
Television Law:
Repeal, Reauthorize,
or Revise?
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-53........................ The Fiscal Year 2014 June 13, 2013
U.S. Department of
Energy Budget.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-54........................ Title I of the Toxic June 13, 2013
Substance Control
Act: Understanding
its History and
Reviewing its Impact.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-55........................ Examining the Federal June 14, 2013
Government's Response
to the Prescription
Drug Abuse Crisis.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-56........................ Continuing Concerns June 18, 2013
Over BioWatch and the
Surveillance of
Bioterrorism.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-57........................ U.S. Energy Abundance: June 18, 2013
Regulatory, Market,
and Legal Barriers to
Export. (Subcommittee
on Energy and Power).
113-58........................ U.S. Energy Abundance: June 20, 2013
Manufacturing
Competitiveness and
America's Energy
Advantage.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade and
Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-59........................ A 21st Century June 26, 2013
Medicare: Bipartisan
Proposals to Redesign
the Program's
Outdated Benefit
Structure.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-60........................ Challenges Facing June 26, 2013
America's Businesses
Under the Patient
Protection and
Affordable Care Act.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-61........................ Overview of the June 26, 2013
Renewable Fuel
Standard: Government
Perspectives.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-62........................ A Tangle of Trade June 27, 2013
Barriers: How India's
Industrial Policy Is
Hurting U.S.
Companies.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-63........................ Equipping Carriers and June 27, 2013
Agencies in the
Wireless Era.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-64........................ Examining Reforms to June 28, 2013
Improve the Medicare
Part B Drug Program
for Seniors.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-65........................ Making Medicaid Work July 8, 2013
for the Most
Vulnerable.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-66........................ H.R. 1900, Natural Gas July 9, 2013
Pipeline Permitting
Reform Act.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-67........................ Cyber Espionage and July 9, 2013
the Theft of U.S.
Intellectual Property
and Technology.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-68........................ Regulation of New July 11, 2013
Chemicals, Protection
of Confidential
Business Information,
and Innovation.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-69........................ Improving FCC Process. July 11, 2013
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-70........................ Reforming the Drug July 16, 2013
Compounding
Regulatory Framework.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-71........................ Reporting Data July 18, 2013
Breaches: Is Federal
Legislation Needed to
Protect Consumers?
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-72........................ Patient Protection and July 18, 2013
Affordable Care Act:
Implementation in the
Wake of
Administrative Delay.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-73........................ Oversight of Incentive July 23, 2013
Auction
Implementation.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-74........................ Overview of the July 23-24, 2013
Renewable Fuel
Standard: Stakeholder
Perspectives.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-75........................ The U.S.-E.U. Free July 24, 2013
Trade Agreement:
Tipping Over the
Regulatory Barriers.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-76........................ Department of Energy July 24, 2013
Oversight: What is
Necessary to Improve
Project Management
and Mission
Performance?
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-77........................ Oversight of DOE's July 31, 2013
Strategy for the
Management and
Disposal of Used
Nuclear Fuel and High-
Level Radioactive
Waste. (Subcommittee
on Environment and
the Economy).
113-78........................ PPACA Pulse Check. August 1, 2013
(Full Committee).
113-79........................ Implementing the September 10,
Nuclear Waste Policy 2013
Act--Next Steps.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-80........................ PPACA Pulse Check: September 10,
Part 2. (Subcommittee 2013
on Health).
113-81........................ Innovation Versus September 11,
Regulation in the 2013
Video Marketplace.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-82........................ The Obama September 18,
Administration's 2013
Climate Change
Policies and
Activities.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-83........................ Regulation of Existing September 18,
Chemicals and the 2013
Role of Pre-Emption
under Sections 6 and
18 of the Toxic
Substances Control
Act. (Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-84........................ Two Weeks Until September 19,
Enrollment: Questions 2013
for CCIIO.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-85........................ Keystone's Red Tape September 19,
Anniversary: Five 2013
Years of Bureaucratic
Delay and Economic
Benefits Denied.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-86........................ The Evolution of Wired October 23, 2013
Communications
Networks.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-87........................ PPACA Implementation October 24, 2013
Failures: Didn't Know
or Didn't Disclose?
(Full Committee).
113-88........................ H.R. 3301, the ``North October 29, 2013
American Energy
Infrastructure Act.''
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-89........................ EPA's Regulatory October 29, 2013
Threat to Affordable,
Reliable Energy: The
Perspective of Coal
Communities.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-90........................ PPACA Implementation October 30, 2013
Failures: Answers
from HHS. (Full
Committee).
113-91........................ H.R. 1518, a bill to November 13,
amend the Horse 2013
Protection Act.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-92........................ S. 1009, Chemical November 13,
Safety Improvement 2013
Act. (Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-93........................ Challenges and November 13,
Opportunities in the 2013
5GHz Spectrum Band.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-94........................ EPA's Proposed GHG November 14,
Standards for New 2013
Power Plants and H.R.
__, Whitfield-Manchin
Legislation.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-95........................ Obamacare November 14,
Implementation 2013
Problems: More than
Just a Broken
Website.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-96........................ The Impact of Patent November 14,
Assertion Entities on 2013
Innovation and the
Economy.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-97........................ Our Nation of November 15,
Builders: Training 2013
the Builders of the
Future. (Subcommittee
on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-98........................ Reviewing FDA's November 15,
Implementation of 2013
FDASIA. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-99........................ Examining Federal November 19,
Regulation of Mobile 2013
Medical Apps and
Other Health
Software.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-100....................... Security of November 19,
HealthCare.gov. 2013
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-101....................... Examining Public November 20,
Health Legislation to 2013
Help Local
Communities.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-102....................... H.R. 2012, a bill to November 21,
improve the integrity 2013
and safety of
interstate
horseracing, and for
other purposes.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-103....................... Oversight of FirstNet November 21,
and the Advancement 2013
of Public Safety
Wireless
Communications.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-104....................... The FTC at 100: Where December 3, 2013
Do We Go From Here?
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-105....................... Medicare Advantage: December 4, 2013
What Beneficiaries
Should Expect Under
the President's
Health Care Plan.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-106....................... Evaluating the Role of December 5, 2013
FERC in a Changing
Energy Landscape.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-107....................... The State of Online December 10,
Gaming. (Subcommittee 2013
on Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-108....................... PPACA Implementation December 11,
Failures: What's 2013
Next? (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-109....................... Oversight of the December 12,
Federal 2013
Communications
Commission.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-110....................... Oversight of NRC December 12,
Management and the 2013
Need for Legislative
Reform. (Subcommittee
on Environment and
the Economy and
Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-111....................... The Extenders January 1, 2014
Policies: What Are
They and How Should
They Continue Under a
Permanent SGR Repeal
Landscape?
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-112....................... #CommActUpdate: January 15, 2014
Perspectives from
Former FCC Chairmen.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-113....................... 2014: Seeking PPACA January 16, 2014
Answers.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-114....................... Testing of Chemicals February 4, 2014
and Reporting and
Retention of
Information under
TSCA Sections 4 and
8. (Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-115....................... Protecting Consumer February 5, 2014
Information: Can Data
Breaches Be
Prevented?
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-116....................... Examining the February 5, 2014
Implementation of the
Food Safety
Modernization Act.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-117....................... Examining Drug February 10,
Shortages and Recent 2014
Efforts to Address
Them. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-118....................... Department of Energy February 11,
Oversight: Status of 2014
Clean Coal Programs.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-119....................... Messing with Success: February 26,
How CMS' Attack on 2014
the Part D Program
Will Increase Costs
and Reduce Choices
for Seniors.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-120....................... Counterfeit Drugs: February 27,
Fighting Illegal 2014
Supply Chains.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-121....................... Benefits of and February 27,
Challenges to Energy 2014
Access in the 21st
Century: Electricity.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-122....................... The FTC at 100: Views February 28,
from the Academic 2014
Experts.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-123....................... Keeping the Promise: March 4, 2014
How Better Managing
Medicare Can Protect
Seniors' Benefits and
Save Them Money.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-124....................... Benefits of and March 6, 2014
Challenges to Energy
Access in the 21st
Century: Fuel Supply
and Infrastructure.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-125....................... Chemicals in Commerce March 12, 2014
Act. (Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-126....................... Reauthorization of the March 12, 2014
Satellite Television
Extension and
Localism Act.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-127....................... Keeping the Promise: March 13, 2014
Allowing Seniors to
Keep Their Medicare
Advantage Plans If
They Like Them.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-128....................... Improving Sports March 13, 2014
Safety: A
Multifaceted
Approach.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-129....................... H.R. 6, the ``Domestic March 25, 2014
Prosperity and Global
Freedom Act.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-130....................... Where Have All the March 26, 2014
Patients Gone?
Examining the
Psychiatric Bed
Shortage.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-131....................... The GM Ignition Switch April 1, 2014
Recall: Why Did It
Take So Long?
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-132....................... Examining Concerns April 1, 2014
Regarding FDA's
Proposed Changes to
Generic Drug
Labeling.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-133....................... The Fiscal Year 2015 April 2, 2014
EPA Budget.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy and
Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-134....................... Ensuring the Security, April 2, 2014
Stability,
Resilience, and
Freedom of the Global
Internet.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-135....................... Fiscal Year 2015 April 3, 2014
Department of Energy
Budget. (Subcommittee
on Energy and Power).
113-136....................... H.R. 3717, the April 3, 2014
``Helping Families in
Mental Health Crisis
Act of 2013.''
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-137....................... Improving April 7, 2014
Predictability and
Transparency in DEA
and FDA Regulation.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-138....................... Trolling for a April 8, 2014
Solution: Ending
Abusive Patent Demand
Letters.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-139....................... Examining the April 8, 2014
Implementation of the
Tobacco Control Act.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-140....................... Examining the Growing April 29, 2014
Problems of
Prescription Drug and
Heroin Abuse.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-141....................... The Chemicals in April 29, 2014
Commerce Act.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-142....................... Telehealth to Digital May 1, 2014
Medicine: How 21st
Century Technology
Can Benefit Patients.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-143....................... The NRC FY 2015 Budget May 7, 2014
and Policy Issues.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-144....................... PPACA Enrollment and May 7, 2014
the Insurance
Industry.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-145....................... 21st Century Cures: May 20, 2014
The President's
Council of Advisors
on Science and
Technology (PCAST)
Report on Drug
Innovation.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-146....................... Oversight of the May 20, 2014
Federal
Communications
Commission.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-147....................... H.R. __, the May 21, 2014
``Promoting New
Manufacturing Act.''
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-148....................... Keeping the Promise: May 21, 2014
Site of Service
Medicare Payment
Reforms.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-149....................... H.R. __, a bill to May 22, 2014
enhance federal and
state enforcement of
fraudulent patent
demand letters.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-150....................... Department of Energy May 30, 2014
Oversight: Status of
Loan Programs.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-151....................... 21st Century Cures: June 11, 2014
Examining the Role of
Incentives in
Advancing Treatments
and Cures for
Patients.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-152....................... Media Ownership in the June 11, 2014
21st Century.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-153....................... The President's Health June 12, 2014
Care Law Does Not
Equal Health Care
Access. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-154....................... The GM Ignition Switch June 18, 2014
Recall: Investigation
Update. (Subcommittee
on Oversight and
Investigations).
113-155....................... EPA's Proposed Carbon June 19, 2014
Dioxide Regulations
for Power Plants.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-156....................... Medicare Program June 25, 2014
Integrity: Screening
Out Errors, Fraud,
and Abuse.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-157....................... 21st Century Cures: July 9, 2014
Modernizing Clinical
Trials. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-158....................... 21st Century Cures: July 11, 2014
Incorporating the
Patient Perspective.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-159....................... Constitutional July 11, 2014
Considerations:
States vs. Federal
Environmental Policy
Implementation.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-160....................... Review of CDC Anthrax July 16, 2014
Lab Incident.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-161....................... Failure to Verify: July 16, 2014
Concerns Regarding
PPACA's Eligibility
System. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-162....................... 21st Century July 17, 2014
Technology for 21st
Century Cures.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology and
Subcommittee on
Health).
113-163....................... 21st Century Cures: July 22, 2014
Examining Barriers to
Ongoing Evidence
Development and
Communication.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-164....................... Modernizing the July 23, 2014
Business of
Environmental
Regulation and
Protection.
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-165....................... Labs of Democracy: The July 24, 2014
Economic Impacts of
State Energy
Policies.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-166....................... A legislative hearing July 24, 2014
on H.R. 3670, the
Anti-Spoofing Act of
2013, H.R. __, the
LPTV and Translator
Act of 2014, and H.R.
__, the E-LABEL Act.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-167....................... Protecting Americans July 28, 2014
from Illegal Bailouts
and Plan
Cancellations Under
the President's
Health Care Law.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-168....................... FERC Perspectives: July 29, 2014
Questions Concerning
EPA's Proposed Clean
Power Plan and other
Grid Reliability
Challenges.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-169....................... Nanotechnology: July 29, 2014
Understanding How
Small Solutions Drive
Big Innovation.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-170....................... PPACA Implementation: July 31, 2014
Updates from CMS and
GAO. (Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-171....................... 21st Century Cures: September 9,
Examining the 2014
Regulation of
Laboratory Developed
Tests. (Subcommittee
on Health).
113-172....................... State Perspectives: September 9,
Questions Concerning 2014
EPA's Proposed Clean
Power Plan.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-173....................... Examining H.R. __, the September 11,
Trafficking Awareness 2014
Training for Health
Care Act of 2014.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-174....................... A hearing on H.R. September 17,
4526, the 21st 2014
Century Energy
Workforce Development
Jobs Initiative Act
of 2014.
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
113-175....................... Oversight of FCC September 17,
Budget and 2014
Management.
(Subcommittee on
Communications and
Technology).
113-176....................... Cross Border Data September 17,
Flows: Could Foreign 2014
Protectionism Hurt
U.S. Jobs?
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-177....................... Suicide Prevention and September 18,
Treatment--Helping 2014
Loved Ones in Mental
Health Crisis.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-178....................... 21st Century Cures: September 19,
Examining Ways to 2014
Combat Antibiotic
Resistance and Foster
New Drug Development.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-179....................... Examining the U.S. September 16,
Public Health 2014
Response to the Ebola
Outbreak.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-180....................... Update on the U.S. November 18,
Public Health 2014
Response to the Ebola
Outbreak.
(Subcommittee on
Oversight and
Investigations).
113-181....................... Cyanotoxins in November 19,
Drinking Water. 2014
(Subcommittee on
Environment and the
Economy).
113-182....................... Examining Medical November 19,
Product Development 2014
in the Wake of the
Ebola Epidemic.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-183....................... Takata Airbag Ruptures December 3, 2014
and Recalls.
(Subcommittee on
Commerce,
Manufacturing, and
Trade).
113-184....................... The Future of the December 3, 2014
Children's Health
Insurance Program.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-185....................... Setting Fiscal December 9, 2014
Priorities.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-186....................... Examining FDA's Role December 10,
in the Regulation of 2014
Genetically Modified
Food Ingredients.
(Subcommittee on
Health).
113-187....................... The Energy Policy and December 11,
Conservation Act of 2014
1975: Are We
Positioning America
for Success in an Era
of Energy Abundance?
(Subcommittee on
Energy and Power).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINORITY VIEWS
The Energy and Commerce Committee possesses the broadest
jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing committee. Its
work can impact the lives of every American. That is why it is
so important that the Committee work in a bipartisan way to
advance the interests of the nation.
Unfortunately, on key issues like health care and energy
policy, the Republican majority pursued a partisan agenda.
While the Committee was able to work together on smaller
issues, we failed too often on the major ones.
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
The Committee's oversight of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
was marked by a series of false predications and incorrect
allegations about how the law was working. The majority
incorrectly predicted that ACA premiums would be unaffordable
in 2014 and would increase significantly in 2015--neither of
these occurred. The majority published information stating that
one-third of individuals who had enrolled in the ACA had not
paid for their plans, while ACA insurers revealed this
information as incorrect. The majority insisted wrongly that
the healthcare.gov website could not be fixed or that the
website was insecure and placed private information at risk.
The majority claimed that the ACA would result in a net
increase in the number of uninsured Americans; in fact, the
number of uninsured Americans has declined by over ten million.
The majority claimed that the ACA would result in job losses--
but the American economy has been gaining jobs at its highest
rate in years since full ACA coverage went into effect in
January 2014. The majority claimed that ACA would increase
health care costs, but cost growth has slowed to its lowest
level in decades since passage of the law.
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
The majority continued from the previous Congress its one-
sided, unbalanced approach to energy and environmental issues.
In its legislative activity, most of the Subcommittee on Energy
and Power's attention focused on bills that would have, if
enacted, curtailed environmental protections, allowed more
pollution, increased harm to public health and disregarded
well-established science. These included bills to strip the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the authority to
regulate carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants; to
allow the Secretary of Energy to block significant regulations
under any of the environmental protection laws administered by
the EPA; to approve the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline; and to
eliminate the consideration of public health, safety, or
environmental impacts in the permitting of cross-border oil
pipelines. For additional detail on each of the legislative
attempts to weaken the nation's laws that protect public health
and the environment, please see the dissenting views for each
piece of legislation.
The Subcommittee on Energy and Power also considered
several bills that could appropriately be characterized as
solutions in search of a problem. These included a bill to
modify the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's process for
permitting natural gas pipelines, and a bill to reorganize the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Testimony received in hearings
on these bills did not demonstrate the need for legislation in
these areas or the particular changes proposed.
H.R. 4795, the ``Promoting New Manufacturing Act,'' also
addressed a fabricated problem. In testimony before the
Committee, representatives of states made it clear that the
existing preconstruction permitting process would not benefit
from changes contemplated in the bill and could actually result
in unnecessary permitting delays. By setting vague procedural
requirements for EPA to follow and applying an outdated
standard if EPA fails to meet those requirements, the bill
would create more regulatory uncertainty, would set up new
avenues for litigation, and would jeopardize public health.
The Subcommittee on Energy and Power only considered a few
bills that were broadly supported on a bipartisan basis and
they were quite narrowly tailored. While these bills would make
incremental improvements in various matters relating to energy,
they would not strengthen environmental protections or reduce
pollution.
The majority's oversight activities also continued the
approach of the previous Congress, focusing on critiquing
Administration policies, decrying environmental regulation,
promoting fossil fuels, and calling for approval of the
Keystone XL pipeline. One exception was the majority's effort
to review the Renewable Fuel Standard, which was conducted on a
bipartisan and more balanced basis.
As in previous years, the majority continued its
fundamental dereliction of its duties by denying and ignoring
climate change, the most dangerous threat to the health and
well-being of the American people within the jurisdiction of
the Subcommittee. The only climate-related activities
undertaken by the majority were oversight hearings and
consideration of bills that aimed to block EPA's regulation of
carbon pollution or mandate approval of projects that would
exacerbate carbon pollution. This reckless approach to climate
change was also displayed in regard to the majority's handling
of the Administration's guidance for calculating the benefits
to society of cutting carbon pollution. In this case, a member
of the Committee took the unusual approach of waiting until a
bill reported by the Committee was considered on the House
floor to offer a counterfactual amendment requiring the
government to assume that carbon pollution has no negative
impacts at all. The majority continued to ignore or deny
numerous minority requests for oversight hearings on new
scientific findings and other developments related to climate
change.
The Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy considered
troubling, and at times puzzling, legislative proposals. The
majority's description of H.R. 2218, the ``Coal Residuals Reuse
and Management Act of 2013,'' fails to mention that EPA
currently has statutory authority to establish rules that
provide for the safe disposal of coal ash pursuant to the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. H.R. 2218 would
permanently block EPA from exercising this authority.
Additionally, the majority's description of the ``Reducing
Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of 2013'' neglected to
mention that the bill would repeal a deadline that was the
basis for litigation to end EPA's delay in promulgating rules
to ensure the safe disposal of coal ash. Finally, the
``Reducing Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of 2013,'' the
``Federal and State Partnership for Environmental Protection
Act of 2013,'' and the ``Federal Facilities Accountability Act
of 2013'' were not based on any oversight record before the
Committee. This might explain the confused basis for these
bills and general lack of support for them by stakeholders. For
additional detail on the deficiencies of these proposals,
please see the dissenting views for each piece of legislation.
While the bill was noncontroversial, the majority's
description of H.R. 3588, the ``Community Fire Safety Act of
2013,'' lacks important context. That bill amended an earlier
law, the ``Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act,'' adopted
in 2011 to redefine ``lead-free'' under the Safe Drinking Water
Act with respect to faucets and plumbing fixtures. The
Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act lowered the permissible
amount of lead in a faucet or fixture from 8% lead to .25% lead
in the wetted surfaces, and provided a three year timeframe to
allow affected parties to transition. H.R. 3588 was introduced
and adopted because manufacturers of fire hydrants did not
become aware that they would be covered by the lead content
restriction until October 2013 when EPA published answers to
Frequently Asked Questions. Because of the short time between
the issuance of the Frequently Asked Questions document and the
effective date of the requirements, fire hydrants on the market
did not meet the specifications and it was not expected that a
compliant hydrant would be commercially available by the
effective date.
The October 2013 EPA document responded to questions from
water utilities regarding coverage of hydrants. EPA gathered
information from water systems about their use of fire hydrants
to deliver drinking water and found that many systems route
drinking water through hydrants while doing repairs and for
large-scale events. In one notable case, a 300 unit housing
complex had received its drinking water through a fire hydrant
for a period of six months. Based on that information, EPA
concluded that hydrants were covered by the lead content
limitations.
H.R. 3588 did not refute the evidence that hydrants were
being used in the distribution of drinking water. It was
introduced and adopted to ensure that hydrants would remain
commercially available, while requiring EPA to consult the
National Drinking Water Advisory Council on ways to address
lead exposures from all parts of distribution systems including
hydrants used during repairs.
The majority's description of H.R. 4007 also lacks
important context. The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
Standards (CFATS) program at the Department of Homeland
Security was created through an appropriations rider and was
scheduled to sunset in 2009. With subsequent appropriations
bills and continuing resolutions, the sunset date of the
program was pushed back. However, during the government
shutdown of 2013, the authority for the program lapsed. That
lapse, and the risk of future lapses, provided a strong
incentive to give the program a longer authorization.
The CFATS program has been plagued by problems since its
creation. The original statute blocked effective enforcement by
the Department, leading to a lack of compliance.
The Department also has been blocked from requiring
measures to reduce the consequences of a terrorist attack,
creating serious obstacles to disapproving site security plans
that fail to meet the program's standards. H.R. 4007 does not
include any provisions to address these problems. However, the
bill does include a new self-certification program that has not
been evaluated in hearings or piloted. It represents a
significant and unvetted change to the program that could make
many high risk chemical facilities less secure.
The Environment and the Economy Subcommittee did not have
an opportunity to improve the CFATS bill, as it was never
subject to regular order.
In 2014, the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy
undertook a significant, but ultimately unsuccessful,
bipartisan effort to negotiate legislation to reform the Toxic
Substances Control Act. Unfortunately, development of draft
legislation began without the input of the Ranking Member and
other Subcommittee Democrats. It was only following circulation
of the initial partisan text that Democratic members of the
Subcommittee and their staffs were able to engage extensively
with Chairman Shimkus and committee staff. The negotiations did
identify a few potential areas of consensus, such as the need
to leverage existing information, increase user fees, establish
deadlines, and ensure that confidentiality claims are
justified. However, the negotiations also identified
significant issues of disagreement, such as the lack of an
explicitly risk-based standard for both identifying and
managing risks, the lack of protections for vulnerable
populations in risk management, limitations on testing
authority, broad exemptions from regulatory authority,
obstacles to agency action, litigation opportunities, lack of
transparency, and preemption problems. These and other
significant stakeholder concerns regarding the Chemicals in
Commerce Act began to surface from a variety of outside
perspectives. Ultimately, no changes were made in the last
released discussion draft even to reflect the areas of
consensus, and negotiations ceased. The ``Chemicals in Commerce
Act'' was never introduced and no markup was ever scheduled.
The current version of the discussion draft contains
fundamental flaws, and fails to effectively improve current
law.
The majority's report describes the legislative history of
S. 1009, despite the fact that the bill was not marked up by
the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, subject
to a vote on the Senate floor, introduced in the House, or
referred to the Energy and Commerce Committee. S. 1009 was one
of two bills to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act
introduced by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) during the 113th
Congress. S. 696, the ``Safe Chemicals Act of 2013,'' was
introduced on April 10, 2013. The two bills received the same
consideration in the Senate, so a summary of S. 696 is provided
below.
Henry A. Waxman.
Safe Chemicals Act of 2013
(S. 696)
To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to ensure that
risks from chemicals are adequately understood and managed, and
for other purposes.
Summary
S. 696 would first require EPA to reset the TSCA inventory,
essentially determining which chemicals are still actively
manufactured or processed, and to update the TSCA inventory
accordingly.
For chemical substances on the updated inventory, the bill
would then require EPA to establish minimum information sets
sufficient to enable the Agency to conduct a screening-level
risk assessment. Manufacturers and processors, in turn, would
be required to collect or generate this information and submit
it to EPA.
Using the minimum information sets, EPA would categorize
all chemical substances into one of four groups: (1) substances
of very high concern, (2) substances likely to meet the safety
standard, (3) substances with insufficient information, and (4)
substances unlikely to meet the safety standard. The intent
would be for EPA to first focus its resources on analyzing and
managing chemicals of the greatest concern.
S. 696 would also amend the safety standard under TSCA. In
order to meet the standard, EPA must find a reasonable
certainty that no harm would result to human health or the
environment, taking into consideration vulnerable populations
and aggregate and cumulative exposure to chemical substances.
Unlike current TSCA, S. 696 shifts the burden of proving that
chemical substances meet the safety standard from EPA to the
manufacturers and processors of those substances. The
manufacturers and processors would be required to provide the
Agency with information sufficient to determine that the
standards have been met. Where data deficiencies exist, EPA
would be authorized to mandate additional testing by rule or
order.
S. 696 would also list the types of information eligible
for confidential treatment, and, importantly, clarify that
health and safety information can never be shielded from public
disclosure.