[House Report 113-314]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


113th Congress  }                                            {   Report
  1st Session   }       HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES             {  113-314
_______________________________________________________________________

                                                 Union Calendar No. 232
 
             REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES 

                                 of the

                  HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                             together with

                            ADDITIONAL VIEWS

                    ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                   (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d))

                  [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]


January 2, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                               ----------
                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 

39-006 PDF                       WASHINGTON : 2014 



                         LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

                              ----------                              

                          House of Representatives,
                            Committee on Homeland Security,
                                   Washington, DC, January 2, 2014.
Hon. Karen L. Haas,
Clerk of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Ms. Haas: Pursuant to Rule X and clause 1(d)(1) of 
Rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, attached, 
please find the of the legislative and oversight activities of 
the Committee on Homeland Security for the First Session of the 
113th Congress.
            Sincerely,
                                         Michael T. McCaul,
                                                          Chairman.



                                                 Union Calendar No. 232
113th Congress  }                                            {   Report
  1st Session   }          HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES          {  113-314

=======================================================================


                 LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE 
                       COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                            113TH CONGRESS

                FIRST SESSION (JANUARY -- DECEMBER 2013)

                                _______
                                

January 2, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. McCaul, from the Committee on Homeland Security, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                             together with

                            ADDITIONAL VIEWS

                                Overview

    The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2013, 
for an organizational meeting for the 113th Congress under the 
direction of Chairman Michael T. McCaul of Texas. The Committee 
Membership, was set at 32 Members with 18 Republicans and 14 
Democrats.
    The Committee established six Subcommittees: The 
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence; the 
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security; the Subcommittee 
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security 
Technologies; the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
Efficiency; the Subcommittee on Transportation Security; and 
the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Jurisdiction and Legislative History.............................     3
Membership and Organization......................................    11
History of the Committee on Homeland Security....................    13
Full Committee
    Legislative Activities.......................................    21
    Oversight Activities.........................................    31
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
    Legislative Activities.......................................    43
    Oversight Activities.........................................    44
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security
    Legislative Activities.......................................    53
    Oversight Activities.........................................    54
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
    Security Technologies
    Legislative Activities.......................................    61
    Oversight Activities.........................................    63
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency
    Oversight Activities.........................................    71
Subcommittee on Transportation Security
    Legislative Activities.......................................    85
    Oversight Activities.........................................    90
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
    Communications
    Legislative Activities.......................................    97
    Oversight Activities.........................................    98
Committee Oversight Plan
    Part A, Oversight Plan As Agreed to..........................   113
    Part B, Implementation of the Oversight Plan.................   129
Appendices
    Appendix I--Committee Rules..................................   153
    Appendix II--Membership Changes to the Committee.............   167
    Appendix III--List of Public Laws............................   177
    Appendix IV--Committee Legislative Reports...................   179
    Appendix V--Status of Legislation Referred to the Committee..   181
    Appendix VI--Executive Communications, Memorials, and 
      Presidential Messages......................................   183
    Appendix VII--Committee Staff................................   185
    Appendix VIII--Witnesses.....................................   189
    Appendix IX--Printed Hearings................................   205
    Appendix X--Committee Prints.................................   209
Additional Views.................................................   211

                  Jurisdiction and Legislative History

    The Committee on Homeland Security was re-established in 
the 113th Congress pursuant to H. Res. 5, the Rules of the 
House of Representatives for the 113th Congress, agreed to on 
January 3, 2013. The jurisdiction of the Committee is as 
follows:

                              HOUSE RULE X

Committees and their legislative jurisdictions

    1. There shall be in the House the following standing 
committees, each of which shall have the jurisdiction and 
related functions assigned by this clause and clauses 2, 3, and 
4. All bills, resolutions, and other matters relating to 
subjects within the jurisdiction of the standing committees 
listed in this clause shall be referred to those committees, in 
accordance with clause 2 of rule XII, as follows:

                     *      *      *      *      *

    (I) Committee on Homeland Security
          (1) Overall homeland security policy.
    (j) Committee on Homeland Security.
          (1) Overall homeland security policy.
          (2) Organization, administration, and general 
        management of the Department of Homeland Security.
          (3) Functions of the Department of Homeland Security 
        relating to the following:
            (A) Border and port security (except immigration 
        policy and non-border enforcement).
            (B) Customs (except customs revenue).
            (C) Integration, analysis, and dissemination of 
        homeland security information.
            (D) Domestic preparedness for and collective 
        response to terrorism.
            (E) Research and development.
            (F) Transportation security.

                     *      *      *      *      *

General oversight responsibilities

    2. (a) The various standing committees shall have general 
oversight responsibilities as provided in paragraph (b) in 
order to assist the House in
          (1) its analysis, appraisal, and evaluation of--
                  (A) the application, administration, 
                execution, and effectiveness of Federal laws; 
                and
                  (B) conditions and circumstances that may 
                indicate the necessity or Desirability of 
                enacting new or additional legislation; and
          (2) its formulation, consideration, and enactment of 
        changes in Federal laws, and of such additional 
        legislation as may be necessary or appropriate.
    (b)(1) In order to determine whether laws and programs 
addressing subjects within the jurisdiction of a committee are 
being implemented and carried out in accordance with the intent 
of Congress and whether they should be continued, curtailed, or 
eliminated, each standing committee (other than the Committee 
on Appropriations) shall review and study on a continuing 
basis--
          (A) the application, administration, execution, and 
        effectiveness of laws and programs addressing subjects 
        within its jurisdiction;
          (B) the organization and operation of Federal 
        agencies and entities having responsibilities for the 
        administration and execution of laws and programs 
        addressing subjects within its jurisdiction;
          (C) any conditions or circumstances that may indicate 
        the necessity or desirability of enacting new or 
        additional legislation addressing subjects within its 
        jurisdiction (whether or not a bill or resolution has 
        been introduced with respect thereto); and
          (D) future research and forecasting on subjects 
        within its jurisdiction.
    (2) Each committee to which subparagraph (1) applies having 
more than 20 members shall establish an oversight subcommittee, 
or require its subcommittees to conduct oversight in their 
respective jurisdictions, to assist in carrying out its 
responsibilities under this clause. The establishment of an 
oversight subcommittee does not limit the responsibility of a 
subcommittee with legislative jurisdiction in carrying out its 
oversight responsibilities.
    (c) Each standing committee shall review and study on a 
continuing basis the impact or probable impact of tax policies 
affecting subjects within its jurisdiction as described in 
clauses 1 and 3.
    (d)(1) Not later than February 15 of the first session of a 
Congress, each standing committee shall, in a meeting that is 
open to the public and with a quorum present, adopt its 
oversight plan for that Congress. Such plan shall be submitted 
simultaneously to the Committee on Government Reform and to the 
Committee on House Administration. In developing its plan each 
committee shall, to the maximum extent feasible--
          (A) consult with other committees that have 
        jurisdiction over the same or related laws, programs, 
        or agencies within its jurisdiction with the objective 
        of ensuring maximum coordination and cooperation among 
        committees when conducting reviews of such laws, 
        programs, or agencies and include in its plan an 
        explanation of steps that have been or will be taken to 
        ensure such coordination and cooperation;
          (B) review specific problems with Federal rules, 
        regulations, statutes, and court decisions that are 
        ambiguous, arbitrary, or nonsensical, or that impose 
        severe financial burdens on individuals;
          (C) give priority consideration to including in its 
        plan the review of those laws, programs, or agencies 
        operating under permanent budget authority or permanent 
        statutory authority;
          (D) have a view toward ensuring that all significant 
        laws, programs, or agencies within its jurisdiction are 
        subject to review every 10 years; and
          (E) have a view toward insuring against duplication 
        of Federal programs.
    (2) Not later than March 31 in the first session of a 
Congress, after consultation with the Speaker, the Majority 
Leader, and the Minority Leader, the Committee on Government 
Reform shall report to the House the oversight plans submitted 
by committees together with any recommendations that it, or the 
House leadership group described above, may make to ensure the 
most effective coordination of oversight plans and otherwise to 
achieve the objectives of this clause.
    (e) The Speaker, with the approval of the House, may 
appoint special ad hoc oversight committees for the purpose of 
reviewing specific matters within the jurisdiction of two or 
more standing committees.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Special oversight functions

    3. (g)(1) The Committee on Homeland Security shall review 
and study on a continuing basis all Government activities 
relating to homeland security, including the interaction of all 
departments and agencies with the Department of Homeland 
Security.
      (2) In addition, the committee shall review and study on 
a primary and continuing basis all Government activities, 
programs and organizations related to homeland security that 
fall within its primary legislative jurisdiction.

                              ----------                              


           Legislative History To Accompany Changes to Rule X


           (Congressional Record, January 4, 2005, Page H25)

             Rule X and the Committee on Homeland Security


Legislative History

    Overall homeland security policy--The jurisdiction of the 
Committee on Homeland Security over ``overall homeland security 
policy'' is to be interpreted on a government-wide or multi-
agency basis similar to the Committee on Government Reform's 
jurisdiction over ``overall economy, efficiency, and management 
of government operations and activities . . . .'' Surgical 
addresses of homeland security policy in sundry areas of 
jurisdiction occupied by other committees would not be referred 
to the Committee on Homeland Security on the basis of 
``overall'' homeland security policy jurisdiction.
    For example, the Committee on Homeland Security shall have 
jurisdiction over a bill coordinating the homeland security 
efforts by all of the critical infrastructure protection 
sectors. Jurisdiction over a bill addressing the protection of 
a particular sector would lie with the committee otherwise 
having jurisdiction over that sector.
    Organization and administration of the Department of 
Homeland Security--The jurisdiction of the Committee on 
Homeland Security would apply only to organizational or 
administrative aspects of the Department where another 
committee's jurisdiction did not clearly apply. The Committee's 
jurisdiction is to be confined to organizational and 
administrative efforts and would not apply to programmatic 
efforts within the Department of Homeland Security within the 
jurisdiction of other committees.
    Homeland Security Oversight--This would vest the Committee 
on Homeland Security with oversight jurisdiction over the 
homeland security community of the United States. Nothing in 
this clause shall be construed as prohibiting or otherwise 
restricting the authority of any other committee to study and 
review homeland security activities to the extent that such 
activity directly affects a matter otherwise within the 
jurisdiction of that committee.

Individual Committee Concerns

    Agriculture--The jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland 
Security over ``border and port security'' shall be limited to 
agricultural importation and entry inspection activities of the 
Department of Homeland Security under section 421 of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002. The Committee on Agriculture 
shall retain jurisdiction over animal and plant disease policy 
including the authority reserved to the Department of 
Agriculture to regulate policy under section 421 of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and the Animal Health Protection 
Act, the Plant Protection Act, the Plant Quarantine Act, and 
the Agriculture Quarantine Inspection User Fee Account. The 
Committee on Agriculture shall retain jurisdiction over the 
agricultural research and diagnosis mission at the Plum Island 
Animal Disease Center.
    Armed Services--The Committee on Armed Services shall 
retain jurisdiction over warfighting, the military defense of 
the United States, and other military activities, including any 
military response to terrorism, pursuant to section 876 of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
    Energy and Commerce--The Committee on Homeland Security 
shall have jurisdiction over measures that address the 
Department of Homeland Security's activities for domestic 
preparedness and collective response to terrorism. The words 
``to terrorism'' require a direct relation to terrorism. The 
Committee on Homeland Security's jurisdiction over ``collective 
response to terrorism'' means that it shall receive referrals 
of bills addressing the Department of Homeland Security's 
responsibilities for, and assistance to, first responders as a 
whole. The Committee on Energy and Commerce (and other relevant 
committees) shall retain their jurisdiction over bills 
addressing the separate entities that comprise the first 
responders. For example, the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
shall retain its jurisdiction over a bill directing the 
Department of Health and Human Services to train emergency 
medical personnel.
    Financial Services--The Committee on Financial Services 
shall retain jurisdiction over the National Flood Insurance 
Program and Emergency Food and Shelter Program of FEMA, and the 
Defense Production Act. The Committee on Financial Services 
shall retain its jurisdiction over the anti-money laundering, 
terrorist financing, and anti-counterfeiting activities within 
the Department of the Treasury and the financial regulators.
    Government Reform--The Committee on Homeland Security shall 
have jurisdiction over ``the organization and administration of 
the Department of Homeland Security.'' The Committee on 
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over federal civil 
service, the overall economy, efficiency, and management of 
government operations and activities, including Federal 
procurement, and federal paperwork reduction. The Committee on 
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over government-
wide information management efforts including the Federal 
Information Security Management Act. The Committee on Homeland 
Security shall have jurisdiction over integration, analysis, 
and dissemination of homeland security information by the 
Department of Homeland Security, and the Committee on 
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over measures 
addressing public information and records generally including 
the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act. The 
Committee on Government Reform shall have jurisdiction over the 
policy coordination responsibilities of the Office of 
Counternarcotics Enforcement.
    Intelligence--The Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence shall retain jurisdiction over the intelligence 
and intelligence-related activities of all departments and 
agencies of the Federal Government, including the Office of the 
Director of National Intelligence and the National 
Counterterrorism Center as defined in the Intelligence Reform 
and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.
    Judiciary--The Committee on the Judiciary shall retain 
jurisdiction over immigration policy and non-border enforcement 
of the immigration laws. Its jurisdiction over immigration 
policy shall include matters such as the immigration and 
naturalization process, numbers of aliens (including immigrants 
and non-immigrants) allowed, classifications and lengths of 
allowable stay, the adjudication of immigration petitions and 
the requirements for the same, the domestic adjudication of 
immigration petitions and applications submitted to the 
Department of Labor or the Department of Homeland Security and 
setting policy with regard to visa issuance and acceptance. Its 
jurisdiction over non-border enforcement shall be limited to 
those aspects of immigration enforcement not associated with 
the immediate entry of individuals into the country, including 
those aspects of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement. The Committee on Homeland Security shall have 
jurisdiction over border and port security including the 
immigration responsibilities of inspectors at ports of entry 
and the border patrol. As used in the new Rule X(1)(l)(9) and 
this legislative history, the word ``immigration'' shall be 
construed to include ``naturalization'' and no substantive 
change is intended by the new rule's not containing the word 
``naturalization.''
    Science--The Committee on Science shall retain some 
jurisdiction over the research and development activities of 
the Department of Homeland Security as such matters are 
incidental to the Committee on Science's existing jurisdiction 
(except where those activities are in the jurisdiction of 
another committee).
    Transportation and Infrastructure--The Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure shall retain jurisdiction 
over the Coast Guard. However, the Committee on Homeland 
Security has jurisdiction over port security, and some Coast 
Guard responsibilities in that area will fall within the 
jurisdiction of both committees. Jurisdiction over emergency 
preparedness will be split between the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Homeland 
Security. The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
shall retain its jurisdiction under clause 1(r)(2) over 
``federal management of emergencies and natural disasters.'' 
This means that the committee retains its general jurisdiction 
over the emergency preparedness and response operations of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Bills addressing 
FEMA's general preparation for disaster from any cause shall be 
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. 
The Committee on Homeland Security shall have jurisdiction over 
the Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities with 
regard to emergency preparedness only as they relate to acts of 
terrorism. Thus, the Committee on Homeland Security shall have 
jurisdiction over the responsibilities of the Office for 
Domestic Preparedness, in accordance with section 430 of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
    As indicated earlier, the Committee on Homeland Security's 
jurisdiction over ``collective response to terrorism'' means 
that it would receive referrals of bills addressing the 
Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities for, and 
assistance to, first responders as a whole and not over 
measures addressing first responder communities individually.
    The Committee on Homeland Security shall have jurisdiction 
over the functions of the Department of Homeland Security 
relating to transportation security, while the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure shall retain its jurisdiction 
over transportation safety. In general, the Committee on 
Homeland Security would have jurisdiction over bills addressing 
the Transportation Security Administration and the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure would have jurisdiction over 
bills addressing the various entities within the Department of 
Transportation having responsibility for transportation safety, 
such as the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal 
Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The jurisdiction of the 
Committee on Homeland Security does not include expenditures 
from trust funds under the jurisdiction of other committees, 
including but not limited to the Highway Trust Fund, the 
Airport and Airway Trust Fund, the Harbor Maintenance Trust 
Fund, the Federal Buildings Fund, and the Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund.
    Ways and Means--The jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways 
and Means over ``customs revenue'' is intended to include those 
functions contemplated in section 412(b)(2) of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 and includes those functions as carried 
out in collection districts and ports of entry and delivery.
                              ----------                              


      Changes to the Standing Rules -- Section-by-Section Analysis


           (Congressional Record, January 3, 2013, Page H12)

    Clarifications in Rule X. Subsection (c) makes two 
clarifications with respect to clause 1 of rule X. Paragraph 
(1) clarifies that the Committee on Homeland Security's 
jurisdiction includes the general management of the Department 
of Homeland Security. This change is intended to clarify the 
Committee's existing jurisdiction over the organization and 
administration of the department, and is not intended to alter 
the pattern of bill referrals to the Committee on Homeland 
Security, nor is it intended to alter the existing oversight 
jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland Security. Paragraph 
(2) conforms terminology used in the Committee on Natural 
Resources jurisdiction to terminology recognized by the 
Departments of State and Interior.
   Membership and Organization of the Committee on Homeland Security

                                (18-14)

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Vacancy                             Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                               __________
    Appointment of Mr.Michael T. McCaul as Chair, and Mr.Bennie 
G. Thompson of Mississippi as Ranking Minority Member on 
January 3, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 6 and H. Res. 7, 
respectively.
    The Majority Members of the Committee were elected to the 
Committee on January 4, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 17; and the 
Minority Members on January 3, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 7.
    Ms. Janice Hahn of California resigned as a Member of the 
Committee on Homeland Security on January 14, 2013.
    Mr. Filemon Vela of Texas, Mr. Steven A. Horsford of 
Nevada, and Mr. Eric Swalwell of California were elected to the 
Committee on January 14, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 22.
    Mr. Keith J. Rothfus of Pennsylvania resigned as a Member 
of the Committee on Homeland Security on April 16, 2013.
    Mr. Mark Sanford of South Carolina was elected to the 
Committee on June 12, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 257.

                              ----------                              


           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Vice Chair
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi, 
Vice Chair
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
             HISTORY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                 Select Committees on Homeland Security

107th Congress
    In the 107th Congress, the House Select Committee on 
Homeland Security was established on June 19, 2002, pursuant to 
H. Res. 449 (adopted by voice vote). The Committee was composed 
of nine Members of the House: Mr. Richard ``Dick'' Armey of 
Texas, Chairman; Mr. Thomas DeLay of Texas; Mr. Julius Caesar 
``J.C.'' Watts of Oklahoma; Ms. Deborah Pryce of Ohio; Mr. 
Robert Portman of Ohio; Ms. Nancy Pelosi of California; Mr. 
Jonas Martin Frost of Texas; Mr. Robert Menendez of New Jersey; 
and Ms. Rosa L. DeLauro of Connecticut.
    The mandate of the Select Committee in the 107th Congress 
was to ``develop recommendations and report to the House on 
such matters that relate to the establishment of a department 
of homeland security.'' The Select Committee accomplished its 
mandate on November 22, 2002, when the House concurred in the 
Senate amendment to H.R. 5005, a bill establishing the 
Department of Homeland Security, by unanimous consent, and 
cleared H.R. 5005 for the President. The bill was presented to 
the President on November 22, 2002, and was signed on November 
25, 2002, becoming Public Law 107-296.
    The termination date of the House Select Committee on 
Homeland Security was ``after final disposition of a bill [ . . 
. ] including final disposition of any veto message on such 
bill,'' which occurred on November 25, 2002.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 107-296.................  The Homeland        H.R. 5005
                                   Security Act of
                                   2002..
------------------------------------------------------------------------


108th Congress
    The second House Select Committee on Homeland Security was 
established in the 108th Congress on January 7, 2003, pursuant 
to provisions of H. Res. 5 (adopted by a recorded vote of 221 
yeas and 203 nays). The Membership of the Select Committee was 
established on February 12, 2003, as: Mr. Christopher Cox of 
California, Chairman; Ms. Jennifer Dunn of Washington; Mr. 
William ``Bill'' Young of Florida; Mr. Donald ``Don'' Young of 
Alaska; Mr. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. of Wisconsin; Mr. 
Wilbert Joseph ``Billy'' Tauzin of Louisiana; Mr. David Dreier 
of California; Mr. Duncan Hunter of California; Mr. Harold 
Rogers of Kentucky; Mr. Sherwood Boehlert of New York; Mr. 
Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr. Wayne Curtis ``Curt'' Weldon of 
Pennsylvania; Mr. Christopher Shays of Connecticut; Mr. Porter 
J. Goss of Florida; Mr. David Camp of Michigan; Mr. Lincoln 
Diaz-Balart of Florida; Mr. Robert W. Goodlatte of Virginia; 
Mr. Ernest James Istook, Jr. of Oklahoma; Mr. Peter T. King of 
New York; Mr. John E. Linder of Georgia; Mr. John B. Shadegg of 
Arizona; Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. William McClellan 
``Mac'' Thornberry of Texas; Mr. James A. Gibbons of Nevada; 
Ms. Kay Granger of Texas; Mr. Pete Sessions of Texas; Mr. John 
E. Sweeney of New York; Mr. Jim Turner of Texas; Mr. Bennie G. 
Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California; Mr. 
Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman D. Dicks of 
Washington; Mr. Barney Frank of Massachusetts; Ms. Jane Harman 
of California; Mr. Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland; Ms. Louise 
M. Slaughter of New York; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon; Mrs. 
Nita M. Lowey of New York; Mr. Robert E. Andrews of New Jersey; 
Ms. Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Delegate from the District of 
Columbia; Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms. Karen McCarthy of 
Missouri; Ms. Shiela Jackson Lee of Texas; Mr. William ``Bill'' 
Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mrs. Donna M. Christensen, a 
Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr. Bobby ``Bob'' 
Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr. Charles Gonzalez of Texas; Mr. 
Ken Lucas of Kentucky; Mr. James R. Langevin of Rhode Island; 
and Mr. Kendrick B. Meek of Florida.
    The Select Committee was authorized to develop 
recommendations and report to the House by bill or otherwise on 
such matters that relate to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(Public Law 107-296) as may be referred to it by the Speaker, 
and was charged with reviewing and studying on a continuing 
basis laws, programs, and Government activities relating to 
homeland security. In addition, the Select Committee was 
directed to conduct a thorough and complete study of the 
operation and implementation of the Rules of the House, 
including Rule X, with respect to the issue of homeland 
security, and submit its recommendations regarding any changes 
in the Rules of the House to the Committee on Rules not later 
than September 30, 2004.
    On September 30, 2004, the Select Committee on Homeland 
Security submitted its recommendations on jurisdictional 
changes to the Rules of the House of Representatives to the 
Committee on Rules.
    The Committee had six measures signed into law during the 
108th Congress:


------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 108-136.................  National Defense    H.R. 1588\1\
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2004..

Pub. L. 108-268.................  To provide for the  H.R. 4332
                                   transfer of the
                                   Nebraska Avenue
                                   Naval Complex in
                                   the District of
                                   Columbia to
                                   facilitate the
                                   establishment of
                                   the headquarters
                                   for the
                                   Department of
                                   Homeland
                                   Security, to
                                   provide for the
                                   acquisition by
                                   the Department of
                                   the Navy of
                                   suitable
                                   replacement
                                   facilities..

Pub. L. 108-276.................  Project BioShield   S.15
                                   Act of 2004..      (H.R. 2122)

Pub. L. 108-293.................  Coast Guard and     H.R. 2443
                                   Maritime
                                   Transportation
                                   Act of 2004..

Pub. L. 108-330.................  Department of       H.R. 4259
                                   Homeland Security
                                   Financial
                                   Accountability
                                   Act..

Pub. L. 108-458.................  Intelligence        S.2845
                                   Reform and         (H.R. 5223)
                                   Terrorism
                                   Prevention Act of
                                   2004..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
  on Homeland Security.

    Pursuant to H.Res. 5, the Select Committee terminated on 
January 2, 2005, with the expiration of the 108th Congress.

                     Committee on Homeland Security

109th Congress
    The 109th Congress marked the first Congress for the 
standing Committee on Homeland Security. During the two 
previous Congresses, the House of Representatives established 
separate Select Committees on Homeland Security: the first - to 
establish the Department of Homeland Security, the second - to 
monitor the initial activities of the Department and to examine 
the need for a standing committee in the House with 
jurisdictional authority over matters relating to the issue of 
homeland security.
    The Committee on Homeland Security was established as a 
standing Committee of the House with the passage of H.Res. 5, 
on January 4, 2005. The resolution was adopted by a recorded 
vote of 220 yeas and 195 nays.
    The Committee Membership was set at 34 Members with 19 
Republicans and 15 Democrats. The following Members were 
appointed to the Committee on Homeland Security for all or part 
of the Congress: Mr. Christopher Cox of California; Mr. Peter 
T. King of New York; Mr. Don Young of Alaska; Mr. Lamar S.Smith 
of Texas; Mr. Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania; Mr. Christopher 
Shays of Connecticut; Mr. John Linder of Georgia; Mr. Mark E. 
Souder of Indiana; Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia; Mr. Daniel E. 
Lungren of California; Mr. Jim Gibbons of Nevada; Mr. Rob 
Simmons of Connecticut; Mr. Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr. Stevan 
Pearce of New Mexico; Ms. Katherine Harris of Florida; Mr. 
Bobby Jindal of Louisiana; Mr. David G. Reichert of Washington; 
Mr. Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr. Charles W. Dent of 
Pennsylvania; Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida; Mr. Bennie G. 
Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California; Mr. 
Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman D. Dicks of 
Washington; Ms. Jane Harman of California; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio 
of Oregon; Ms. Nita M. Lowey of New York; Ms. Eleanor Holmes 
Norton of District of Columbia; Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California; 
Ms. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas; Mr. Bill Pascrell of Jr., New 
Jersey; Ms. Donna M. Christensen of U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr. 
Bob Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr. James R. Langevin of Rhode 
Island; and Mr. Kendrick B. Meek of Florida.
    On February 9, 2005, the Committee on Homeland Security 
adopted its Rules, which provided for the establishment of five 
Subcommittees. The Subcommittee on Prevention of Nuclear and 
Biological Attack; the Subcommittee on Intelligence, 
Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment; the 
Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection, 
and Cybersecurity; the Subcommittee on Management, Integration, 
and Oversight; and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, 
Science, and Technology.
    On October 7, 2005, the Committee revised its Rules to 
establish a Subcommittee on Investigations.
    The Committee had eight measures signed into law during the 
109th Congress:


------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 109-13..................  Emergency           H.R. 1268\2\
                                   Supplemental       (H.R. 418)
                                   Appropriations
                                   Act for Defense,
                                   the Global War on
                                   Terror, and
                                   Tsunami Relief,
                                   2005..

Pub. L. 109-59..................  Safe, Accountable,  H.R. 3
                                   Flexible,
                                   Efficient
                                   Transportation
                                   Equity Act: A
                                   Legacy for Users..

Pub. L. 109-163.................  National Defense    H.R. 1815
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2006..

Pub. L. 109-241.................  Coast Guard and     H.R. 889
                                   Maritime
                                   Transportation
                                   Act of 2006..

Pub. L. 109-295.................  Department of       H.R. 5441
                                   Homeland Security
                                   Appropriations
                                   Act, 2007..
                                  (Title VI - Post
                                   Katrina Emergency
                                   Management Reform
                                   Act).

Pub. L. 109-347.................  ``Security and      H.R. 4954
                                   Accountability
                                   For Every Port
                                   Act of 2006'' or
                                   the ``SAFE Port
                                   Act''..

Pub. L. 109-364.................  John Warner         H.R. 5122
                                   National Defense
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2007..

Pub. L. 109-367.................  Secure Fence Act    H.R. 6061
                                   of 2006..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
  on Homeland Security.


110th Congress
    The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing 
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 5, agreed to in 
the House on January 4, 2007, by a record vote of 235 yeas and 
195 nays.
    The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2007, 
for an organizational meeting for the 110th Congress under the 
direction of Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi. The 
Committee Membership was set at 34 Members with 19 Democrats 
and 15 Republicans. The following Members were appointed to the 
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress: 
Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez of 
California; Mr. Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman 
D. Dicks of Washington; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Mr. Peter 
A. DeFazio of Oregon; Mrs.Nita M. Lowey of New York; Ms.Eleanor 
Holmes Norton a Delegate from the District of Columbia; Ms.Zoe 
Lofgren of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas; 
Mrs.Donna M. Christensen a Delegate from the U.S. Virgin 
Islands; Mr. Bob Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr. James R. 
Langevin of Rhode Island; Mr. Henry Cuellar of Texas; Mr. 
Christopher P. Carney of Pennsylvania; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke of 
New York; Mr. Al Green of Texas; Mr. Ed Perlmutter of Colorado; 
Mr. Bill Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mr. Peter T. King of New 
York; Mr. Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr. Christopher Shays of 
Connecticut; Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. Tom Davis of 
Virginia; Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr. Mike Rogers 
of Alabama; Mr. David G. Reichert of Washington; Mr. Michael T. 
McCaul of Texas; Mr. Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania; Ms.Ginny 
Brown-Waite of Florida; Mr. Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida; Mr. 
David Davis of Tennessee; Mr. Paul C. Broun of Georgia; 
Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan; Ms. Marsha Blackburn of 
Tennessee; Mr. Kevin McCarthy of California; and Mr. Bobby 
Jindal of Louisiana.
    The Committee established six Subcommittees: the 
Subcommittee on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism; 
the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and 
Terrorism Risk Assessment; the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security and Infrastructure Protection; the Subcommittee on 
Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology; 
the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and 
Response; and the Subcommittee on Management, Investigations, 
and Oversight.
    The Committee had four measures signed into law during the 
110th Congress:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 110-53..................  Implementing        H.R. 1
                                   Recommendations
                                   of the 9/11
                                   Commission Act of
                                   2007..

Pub. L. 110-181.................  National Defense    H.R. 4986\3\
                                   Authorization Act  (H.R. 1585)
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2008..

Pub. L. 110-388.................  A bill to provide   S.2816
                                   for the
                                   appointment of
                                   the Chief Human
                                   Capital Officer
                                   of the Department
                                   of Homeland
                                   Security by the
                                   Secretary of
                                   Homeland
                                   Security..

Pub. L. 110-412.................  Personnel           H.R. 6098
                                   Reimbursement for
                                   Intelligence
                                   Cooperation and
                                   Enhancement of
                                   Homeland Security
                                   Act of 2008..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
  on Homeland Security.


111th Congress

    The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing 
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in 
the House on January 6, 2009, by a record vote of 235 yeas and 
195 nays.
    The Committee on Homeland Security met on February 4, 2009, 
for an organizational meeting for the 111th Congress under the 
direction of Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi. The 
Committee Membership, was set at 34 Members with 21 Democrats 
and 13 Republicans. The following Members were appointed to the 
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress: 
Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta Sanchez, of 
California; Ms. Jane Harman of California; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio 
of Oregon; Ms. Eleanor Holmes Norton a Delegate from the 
District of Columbia; Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms. Sheila 
Jackson-Lee of Texas; Mr. Henry Cuellar of Texas; Mr. 
Christopher P. Carney of Pennsylvania; Ms. Yvette D. Clarke of 
New York; Ms. Laura Richardson of California; Mrs. Ann 
Kirkpatrick of Arizona; Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico; Mr. 
Bill Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mr. Emmanuel Cleaver of 
Missouri; Mr. Al Green of Texas; Mr. James A. Himes of 
Connecticut; Ms. Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio; Mr. Eric J.J. Massa of 
New York; Ms. Dina Titus of Nevada; Mr. William L. Owens of New 
York; Mr. Peter T. King of New York; Mr. Lamar Smith of Texas; 
Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of 
California; Mr. Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr. Michael T. McCaul 
of Texas; Mr. Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania; Mr. Gus M. 
Bilirakis of Florida; Mr. Paul C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs. 
Candice S. Miller of Michigan; Mr. Pete Olson of Texas; Mr. Anh 
``Joseph'' Cao of Louisiana; Mr. Steve Austria of Ohio; and Mr. 
Tom Graves of Georgia.
    The Committee established six Subcommittees: the 
Subcommittee on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism; 
the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and 
Terrorism Risk Assessment; the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security and Infrastructure Protection; the Subcommittee on 
Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology; 
the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and 
Response; and the Subcommittee on Management, Investigations, 
and Oversight.
    The Committee had 14 measures signed into law during the 
111th Congress:

                             111th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 111--84.................  National Defense    H.R. 2647\4\
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2010..

Pub. L. 111--140................  Nuclear Forensics   H.R. 730
                                   and Attribution
                                   Act..

Pub. L. 111--145................  United States       H.R. 1299\5\
                                   Capitol Police     (H.R. 2935)
                                   Administrative
                                   Technical
                                   Correction Act of
                                   2009..

Pub. L. 111--198................  Homebuyer           H.R. 5623
                                   Assistance and
                                   Improvement Act..Pub. L. 111--207................  Cruise Vessel       H.R. 3360
                                   Security and
                                   Safety Act of
                                   2009..Pub. L. 111--245................  First Responder     H.R. 3978
                                   Anti-Terrorism
                                   Training
                                   Resources Act..Pub. L. 111--252................  To allow certain    H.R. 1517
                                   U.S. Customs and
                                   Border Protection
                                   employees who
                                   serve under an
                                   overseas limited
                                   appointment for
                                   at least 2 years,
                                   and whose service
                                   is rated fully
                                   successful or
                                   higher throughout
                                   that time, to be
                                   converted to a
                                   permanent
                                   appointment in
                                   the competitive
                                   service..Pub. L. 111--258................  Reducing Over-      H.R. 553
                                   Classification
                                   Act..Pub. L. 111--259................  Intelligence        H.R. 2701
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2011..Pub. L. 111--271................  Redundancy          H.R. 3980
                                   Elimination and
                                   Enhanced
                                   Performance for
                                   Preparedness
                                   Grants Act..Pub. L. 111--281................  Coast Guard         H.R. 3619
                                   Authorization Act
                                   of 2010..Pub. L. 111--356................  Northern Border     H.R. 4748
                                   Counternarcotics
                                   Strategy Act of
                                   2010..Pub. L. 111--376................  Anti-Border         S. 3243
                                   Corruption Act of
                                   2010..Pub. L. 111--_..................  Ike Skelton         H.R. 6523
                                   National Defense
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2011..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
  on Homeland Security.
\5\ Indicates measures which were not referred to the Committee, but to
  which measures were included during Congressional action.


112th Congress

    The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing 
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in 
the House on January 5, 2011, by a record vote of 238 yeas and 
191 nays.
    The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 26, 2011, 
for an organizational meeting for the 112th Congress under the 
direction of Chairman Peter T. King of New York. The Committee 
Membership, was set at 33 Members with 19 Republicans and 14 
Democrats. The following Members were appointed to the 
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress: 
Mr.Peter T. King of New York; Mr.Lamar Smith of Texas; 
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr.Mike Rogers of Alabama; 
Mr.Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr.Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida; 
Mr.Paul C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan; 
Mr.Tim Walberg of Michigan; Mr.Chip Cravaack of Minnesota; 
Mr.Joe Walsh of Illinois; Mr.Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania; 
Mr.Benjamin Quayle of Arizona; Mr.Scott Rigell of Virginia; 
Mr.Billy Long of Missouri; Mr.Jeff Duncan of South Carolina; 
Mr.Tom Marino of Pennsylvania; Mr.Blake Farenthold of Texas; 
Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama; and Mr.Robert L. Turner of New 
York.Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez, 
of California; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson 
Lee of Texas; Mr.Henry Cuellar of Texas; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke of 
New York; Ms.Laura Richardson of California;Mrs.Donna M. 
Christensen a Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr.Danny 
K. Davis of Illinois; Mr.Brian Higgins of New York; Ms.Jackie 
Speier of California; Mr.Cedric L. Richmond of Louisiana; 
Mr.Hansen Clarke of Michigan; Mr.William R. Keating of 
Massachusetts; Ms.Kathleen C. Hochul of New York; Ms.Janice 
Hahn of California; and Mr.Ron Barber of Arizona.
    The Committee established six Subcommittees: The 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies; the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security; the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and 
Management; the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, 
Response, and Communications; the Subcommittee on Border and 
Maritime Security; and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and 
Intelligence.
    The Committee had 10 measures signed into law during the 
112th Congress:

                             112th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 112--54.................  Asia-Pacific        S. 1487
                                   Economic           (H.R.2042)
                                   Cooperation
                                   Business Travel
                                   Cards Act of
                                   2011..Pub. L. 112--81.................  National Defense    H.R.1540
                                   Authorization Act
                                   for Fiscal Year
                                   2012..Pub. L. 112--86.................  Risk-Based          H.R.1801
                                   Security
                                   Screening for
                                   Members of the
                                   Armed Forces Act.Pub. L. 112--127................  Border Tunnel       H.R.4119
                                   Prevention Act of
                                   2012.Pub. L. 112--171................  To require the      H.R.3670
                                   Transportation
                                   Security
                                   Administration to
                                   comply with the
                                   Uniformed
                                   Services
                                   Employment and
                                   Reemployment
                                   Rights Act..Pub. L. 112--199................  Whistleblower       S.743
                                   Protection         (H.R. 3289)
                                   Enhancement Act
                                   of 2012..Pub. L. 112--205................  Jaime Zapata        H.R.915
                                   Border
                                   Enforcement
                                   Security Task
                                   Force Act..Pub. L. 112--213................  Coast Guard and     H.R. 2838
                                   Maritime
                                   Transportation
                                   Act of 2012 ..Pub. L. 112--217................  DHS Audit           S. 1998
                                   Requirement        (H.R.5941)
                                   Target Act of
                                   2012..Pub. L. 112--218................  No-Hassle Flying    S. 3542
                                   Act of 2012..      (H.R.6028)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
  on Homeland Security.
\7\ Indicates measures which were not referred to the Committee, but to
  which Members were appointed as Conferees.

113th Congress

    The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing 
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in 
the House on January 3, 2013, by a record vote of 228 yeas and 
196 nays.
    The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2013, 
for an organizational meeting for the 113th Congress under the 
direction of Chairman Michael T. McCaul of Texas. The Committee 
Membership, was set at 32 Members with 18 Republicans and 14 
Democrats. The following Members were appointed to the 
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
    Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr. Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr. 
Peter T. King of New York; Mr. Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr. Paul 
C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs. Candice S.Miller of Michigan; Mr. 
Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania; Mr. Jeff Duncan of South 
Carolina; Mr. Tom Marino of Pennsylvania; Mr. Jason Chaffetz of 
Utah; Mr. Steven M. Palazzo of Mississippi; Mr. Lou Barletta of 
Pennsylvania; Mr. Chris Stewart of Utah; Mr. Keith J. Rothfus 
of Pennsylvania; Mr. Richard Hudson of North Carolina; Mr. 
Steve Daines of Montana; Mrs. Susan W. Brooks of Indiana; Mr. 
Scott Perry of Pennsylvania; Mr. Mark Sanford of South 
Carolina; Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta 
Sanchez of California; Ms. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas; Ms. 
Yvette D. Clarke of New York; Mr. Brian Higgins of New York; 
Mr. Cedric L. Richmond of Louisiana; Mr. William R. Keating of 
Massachusetts; Mr. Ron Barber of Arizona; Mr. Donald M. Payne, 
Jr. of New Jersey; Mr. Beto O'Rourke of Texas; Ms. Tulsi 
Gabbard of Hawaii; Mr. Filemon Vela of Texas; Mr. Steven A. 
Horsford of Nevada; and Mr. Eric Swalwell of California.
    The Committee established six Subcommittees: the 
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence; the 
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security; the Subcommittee 
no Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
Technologies; the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
Efficiency; the Subcommittee on Transportation Security; and 
the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications.
    The Committee had one measure signed into law during the 
First Session of the 113th Congress:

                             113th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Law                       Title               Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 113--27.................  Helping Heroes Fly  H.R. 1344
                                   Act..              (S. 1367)
                                                      (S. 1403))
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             Full Committee

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina        Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Committee on Homeland Security held nine hearings, receiving 
testimony from 27 witnesses, and considered six measures.

                              ----------                              


                Organizational Meeting of the Committee

    The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2013, 
for an organizational meeting for the 113th Congress under the 
direction of Chairman Michael T. McCaul of Texas.
    The Full Committee met pursuant to notice and adopted the 
Committee Rules for the 113th Congress by unanimous consent. 
The Committee also approved the Committee on Homeland 
Security's Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress and Committee 
Resolution No. 1, relating to staff hiring, both adopted by 
unanimous consent.

                              ----------                              


               Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee


                         HELPING HEROES FLY ACT

             Pub. Law 113-27, H.R. 1344 (S. 1367, S. 1403)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant 
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) to provide expedited air passenger screening to 
severely injured or disabled members of the Armed Forces and 
severely injured or disabled veterans, and for other purposes.
Summary
    This law directs the Transportation Security Administration 
(TSA) to develop and implement a process to ease travel and, to 
the extent possible, provide expedited passenger screening 
services for severely injured or disabled Armed Forces members 
and veterans, and their accompanying family members or non-
medical attendants. The TSA is required to maintain an 
operations center to provide for the movement of such members 
and veterans through screening before boarding a domestic or 
foreign passenger aircraft. Additionally, the law requires TSA 
to establish and publish certain protocols to contact the 
operations center to request expedited screening services for 
the service member or veteran. Furthermore, the TSA is directed 
to annually report to Congress on the implementation of the 
program. The TSA retains its flexibility to require additional 
screening of any individual if intelligence or law enforcement 
information indicates that additional screening is necessary.
    As of March 2013, TSA began implementing the policies 
codified in this law at security screening checkpoints. This 
law seeks to facilitate the screening of our Nation's wounded 
warriors' through airports and free up TSA screeners to focus 
on real threats to our aviation systems. The Committee has long 
advocated for less onerous airport screening for our men and 
women in uniform. In fact, this bill builds upon past 
legislation promoted by the Committee, including the Risk-Based 
Security Screening for Members of the Armed Forces Act (Pub. L. 
112-86), which requires TSA to provide expedited screening to 
active duty military traveling on official orders.
Legislative History
    H.R. 1344 was introduced in the House on March 21, 2013, by 
Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Joyce, and Mr. Richmond, and referred to the 
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1344 
was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    The House considered H.R. 1344 on May 21, 2013, under 
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\ 
recorded vote of 413 yeas with none voting ``nay'', (Roll No. 
166).
    H.R. 1344 was received in the Senate on May 22, 2013, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.
    On August 1, 2013, the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation was discharged from further 
consideration of H.R. 1344 by unanimous consent. The Senate 
then passed H.R. 1344, with an amendment, by unanimous consent.
    The House concurred in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1344, 
on August 2, 2013, by unanimous consent.
    H.R. 1344 was presented to the President on August 6, 2013, 
and signed into law on August 9, 2013, as Public Law 113-27.

    S. 1367, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the 
Senate on July 25, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and 
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation.

    S. 1403, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the 
Senate on July 31, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and 
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation. The text of S. 1403 was adopted by the Senate 
during consideration of H.R. 1344 on August 1, 2013.

                          TSA LOOSE CHANGE ACT

                               H.R. 1095

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant 
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee, and for other purposes.
Summary
    H.R. 1095 directs the Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA) to transfer unclaimed monies recovered at 
airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations 
providing places of rest and recuperation at airports for 
members of the Armed Forces and their families, and establishes 
a request for proposals (RFP) process to select such 
organizations.
    Section 44945 of title 49, U.S.C., enacted as part of 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. 
L. 108-334), authorized and directed unclaimed money collected 
at airport security checkpoints to be used for civil aviation 
security. According to the report ``FY 2012 Unclaimed Money at 
Airports,'' which was prepared TSA, from FY 2009 through FY 
2012, TSA has collected an average of $465,285 from airport 
security checkpoints annually. Just in FY 2012 alone, TSA 
collected $531,395. However as of March 1, 2013, TSA only 
expended $6,539 for the purpose of civil aviation security.
    The Explanatory Statement contained in the Conference 
Report (H. Rpt. 112-492) that accompanied the Consolidated and 
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, (Pub. L. 113-6), 
required TSA to issue a report on the feasibility of 
transferring the unclaimed money recovered at airport 
checkpoints to non-profit organizations that are selected on a 
competitive basis. According to the report, it would cost the 
Federal Government approximately $201,000 for the first year 
alone if TSA was to transfer the money to a nonprofit 
organization selected on a competitive basis. Further, the 
report concluded that to minimize administrative overhead, TSA 
would prefer to award the use of funding to one nonprofit 
organization. After reviewing TSA's report, the Committee 
believes that in order to ensure fairness of opportunity while 
minimizing administrative overhead, TSA should transfer the 
funds after a RFP is issued. Currently, United Services 
Organizations (USO) is the sole non-profit operating airport 
lounges for military service members and their families. 
However, any non-profit organization that provides these kinds 
of services can submit a proposal to TSA to seek these 
unclaimed funds.
Legislative History
112th Congress
    H.R. 2179 was introduced in the House on June 14, 2011, by 
Mr. Miller of Florida and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2179 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    On March 7, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security considered H.R. 2179 and reported the measure to the 
Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, without 
amendment, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 2179 on March 28, 2012, 
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House, 
amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 2179 to the House on May 8, 
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-468.

113th Congress
    H.R. 1095 was introduced in the House on March 12, 2013, by 
Mr. Miller of Florida and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred 
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, 
H.R. 1095 was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security.
    On October 29, 2013, the Chair discharged the Subcommittee 
on Transportation Security from further consideration of H.R. 
1095.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 1095 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1095 to the House on November 
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-274.
    The House considered H.R. 1095 under Suspension of the 
Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
    H.R. 1095 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013, 
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

        AVIATION SECURITY STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2013

                          H.R. 1204 (S. 1804)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant 
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee, and for other purposes.
Summary
    H.R. 1204 authorizes the Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee (ASAC) and requires Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA) to consult with the ASAC on aviation 
security matters, including on the development and 
implementation of policies, programs, rulemakings and security 
directives. Additionally, the bill requires the ASAC to submit 
recommendations to TSA.
    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) established the 
ASAC in 1989 following the bombing of Pan American World 
Airways Flight 103. Upon the establishment of the TSA, 
sponsorship of the ASAC was transferred to TSA. However, 
despite strong support from aviation security stakeholders who 
participated in the ASAC, TSA has allowed the ASAC's charter to 
expire. On July 7, 2011, TSA published an announcement in the 
Federal Register to re-establish the ASAC, providing a setting 
for the aviation industry to formally communicate with TSA and 
on October 27, 2011, the Secretary of Homeland Security 
appointed 24 new members to the ASAC. On June 11, 2013, TSA 
published a notice of charter renewal in the Federal Register 
to announce the renewal of the ASAC. This legislation not only 
codifies current Department and TSA policy but also ensures 
that the ASAC remains intact.
    In this budgetary environment, it is imperative that the 
TSA interact with industry stakeholders for input on security 
procedures and technology to ensure that the Administration is 
spending its limited resources on initiatives that will enhance 
aviation security for the traveling public.
Legislative History
112th Congress
    H.R.1447 was introduced in the House on April 8, 2011, by 
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi and Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the 
Committee, H.R.1447 was referred to the Subcommittee on 
Transportation Security.
    On September 21, 2011, the Chair discharged the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security from further 
consideration of H.R.1447. The Committee proceeded to the 
consideration of H.R.1447 and ordered the measure to be 
reported to the House, without amendment, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R.1447 to the House on November 4, 
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-269.
    The House considered H.R.1447 under Suspension of the 
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012 
by voice vote.
    H.R.1447 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

113th Congress
    H.R. 1204 was introduced in the House on March 14, 2013, by 
Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Richmond, Ms. Jackson Lee, and 
Mr. Swalwell of California and referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1204 was referred 
to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    The Subcommittee considered H.R. 1204 on July 24, 2013, and 
forwarded H.R. 1204 to the Full Committee with a favorable 
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 1204 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1204 to the House on December 
2, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-278.
    The House considered H.R. 1204 under Suspension of the 
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 411 
yeas and 3 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 617).
    H.R. 1204 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013, 
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

    S. 1804, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in 
the Senate on December 11, 2013.

                  BORDER SECURITY RESULTS ACT OF 2013

                           H.R. 1417 (S. 683)

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a 
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control 
of the international borders of the United States, and for 
other purposes.
Summary
    H.R. 1417 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to 
develop a comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain 
situational awareness and operational control of the border, 
and sets the requirement of achieving operational control in 
high traffic areas within two years and nine months of 
enactment and across the entire Southwest border within five 
years. Operational Control of the border, as defined by the 
bill, means a condition where there is a 90 percent 
effectiveness rate for the apprehension of illegal border 
crossers and a significant reduction in the movement of illicit 
drugs and other contraband.
    This legislation sets the requirements for the Secretary to 
consider when developing the strategy; outlines the benchmarks 
and timetables for achieving situational awareness and 
operational control; and requires metrics to measure 
effectiveness. H.R. 1417 also requires the Secretary to issue a 
baseline assessment of the current level of situational 
awareness and operational control of the border and 
periodically thereafter until the border is deemed to be under 
operational control. Following the baseline assessment, the 
Secretary would be required to submit a comprehensive strategy 
and subsequent plan to gain situational awareness and 
operational control. The plan would be comprised of 
implementation plans for each of the Department's border 
security components and a comprehensive border security 
technology plan outlining a justification for technology 
choices and a timetable for procurement and deployment. This 
legislation also calls for periodic updates of the strategy and 
implementation plan following the publication of future 
Quadrennial Homeland Security Review.
    The Secretary must implement a series of metrics to measure 
the effectiveness of security between the ports of entry, at 
ports of entry, and in the maritime environment. H.R. 1417 also 
requires a Department of Homeland Security National Laboratory 
and a Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence to 
provide an independent assessment of the suitability of the 
metrics the Department develops, and to make recommendations 
for additional metrics to measure border security 
effectiveness.
    Finally, the legislation requires the Government 
Accountability Office to review and report to Congress on the 
suitability and validity of the Secretary's strategy, plan, 
metrics, and the certification of operational control.
Legislative History
    H.R. 1417 was introduced in the House on April 9, 2013, by 
Mr. McCaul, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Mr. 
Thompson of Mississippi and referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1417 was referred 
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security. S. 683, 
the Senate companion measure was introduced on April 9, 2013, 
and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs.
    The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security considered 
H.R. 1417 on April 24, 2013, and ordered the measure reported 
to the Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, as 
amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee on Homeland Security considered H.R. 1417 on 
May 15, 2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the 
House with a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice 
vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1417 to the House on May 20, 
2013 as H. Rpt. 113-87, and placed on the Union Calendar, 
Calendar No. 62.

          WMD INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SHARING ACT OF 2013

                                H.R.1542

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish weapons 
of mass destruction intelligence and information sharing 
functions of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the 
Department of Homeland Security and to require dissemination of 
information analyzed by the Department to entities with 
responsibilities relating to homeland security, and for other 
purposes.
Summary
    H.R. 1542 amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 
107-296) to direct the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of 
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to conduct 
information sharing activities relevant to threats from weapons 
of mass destruction (WMD). H.R. 1542 requires the Department to 
support homeland security-focused intelligence analysis of 
terrorist actors, their claims, and their plans to conduct 
attacks involving chemical, biological, radiological, and 
nuclear materials against the Nation and of global infectious 
disease, public health, food, agricultural, and veterinary 
issues. The act also requires DHS to support homeland security-
focused risk analysis and risk assessments of such homeland 
security hazards by providing relevant quantitative and 
qualitative threat information. Additionally, the act requires 
DHS to leverage homeland security intelligence capabilities and 
structures to enhance prevention, protection, response, and 
recovery efforts with respect to a chemical, biological, 
radiological, or nuclear attack. Furthermore, the act requires 
DHS to share information and provide tailored analytical 
support on these threats to state, local, and tribal 
authorities as well as other national biosecurity and 
biodefense stakeholders.
    H.R. 1542 requires coordination within the Department and 
with the Intelligence Community, Federal, State, local, and 
Tribal authorities where appropriate. The act also directs the 
Secretary of DHS to report annually on: (1) Intelligence and 
information sharing activities to counter the threat from 
weapons of mass destruction, and (2) DHS's activities in 
accordance with relevant intelligence strategies.
Legislative History
112th Congress
    H.R.2764 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2011, by 
Mr.Meehan, Ms.Speier, Mr.Pascrell, Mr.Marino, Mr.King of New 
York, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred to the Committee 
on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2764 was 
referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and 
Intelligence.
    The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence 
considered H.R.2764 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the 
measure to be reported to the Full Committee with a favorable 
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R.2764 on March 28, 2012, 
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House, 
amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R.2764 to the House on May 8, 
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-466.
    The House considered H.R.2764 on May 30, 2012, under 
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
    H.R.2764 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs.

113th Congress
    H.R. 1542 was introduced in the House on April 24, 2013, by 
Mr.Meehan, Ms. Speier, Mr. McCaul, Mr. King of New York, and 
Mr.Higgins, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. 
Within the Committee, H.R. 1542 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
    The House considered H.R. 1542 on July 22, 2013, under 
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\ 
record vote of 388 yeas and 3 nays, (Roll No. 375).
    H.R. 1542 was received in the Senate on July 23, 2013, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs.

                 MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS ALLOWABLE USE ACT

                               H.R. 1791

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority 
under existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area 
Security Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program 
funding for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge 
capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities.
Summary
    H.R. 1791 amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 
107-296) to ensure that grants funds may continue to be used 
for medical preparedness activities.
Legislative History

112th Congress
    H.R. 5997 was introduced in the House on June 21, 2012, by 
Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Clarke of Michigan, Mr. Turner of New York, 
and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5997 was referred 
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications.
    The House considered H.R. 5997 under Suspension of the 
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by a 
\2/3\ recorded vote of 397 yeas and 1 nay (Roll No. 609).

113th Congress
    H.R. 1791 was introduced in the House on April 26, 2013, by 
Mr. Bilirakis, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, and Mr. King of New 
York; and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. 
Within the Committee, H.R. 1791 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications.
    On October 29, 2013, the Chair discharged the Subcommittee 
on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications from 
further consideration of H.R. 1791.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 1791 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1791 to the House on November 
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-273.

             TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ACQUISITION REFORM ACT

                               H.R. 2719

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 
implement best practices and improve transparency with regard 
to technology acquisition programs, and for other purposes.
Summary
    H.R. 2719 was developed with valuable input from 
stakeholders across the Federal Government and industry. The 
bill introduces greater transparency and accountability for the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) spending decisions 
through a series of commonsense reforms. Specifically, it 
requires TSA to develop and share with the public, for the 
first time: A strategic, multiyear technology investment plan; 
share key information with Congress on technology acquisitions, 
including cost overruns, delays, or technical failures within 
30 days of identifying the problem; establish principles for 
managing equipment in inventory to eliminate expensive storage 
of unusable or outdated technologies; and report on its goals 
for contracting with small businesses.
    H.R. 2719 requires TSA to do a better job of not only 
managing its own resources, but also leveraging resources 
outside of the Department of Homeland Security.
Legislative History
    H.R. 2719 was introduced in the House on July 18, 2013, by 
Mr. Hudson, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Richmond, and Mr. Thompson of 
Mississippi, and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2719 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    The Subcommittee considered H.R. 2719 on July 24, 2013, and 
forwarded H.R. 2719 to the Full Committee with a favorable 
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 2719 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 2719 to the House on November 
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-275.
    The House considered H.R. 2719 under Suspension of the 
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 416 
yeas and 0 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 616).
    H.R. 2719 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013, 
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

  CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADVANCEMENT ACT OF 
                                  2013

                          (CIRDA ACT OF 2013)

                               H.R. 2952

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain 
improvements in the laws relating to the advancement of 
security technologies for critical infrastructure protection, 
and for other purposes.
Summary
    H.R. 2952 directs the Department of Homeland Security to 
facilitate the development of a Research and Development (R&D) 
strategy for critical infrastructure security technologies. 
This strategy will help our nation prioritize its investments 
in those aspects of the infrastructure that are most at risk. 
H.R. 2952 also directs the Secretary to explore the feasibility 
of expanding the use of public-private R&D consortiums to 
accelerate new security technologies and spur innovation and 
economic competitiveness. In addition, CIRDA will designate a 
`Technology Clearinghouse' where proven security tools for 
protecting infrastructure can be rapidly shared amongst 
government and private partners.
Legislative History
    H.R. 2952 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2013, by 
Mr. Meehan, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. 
Within the Committee, H.R. 2952 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies.
    On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R. 
2952 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a 
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 2952 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.

        HOMELAND SECURITY CYBERSECURITY BOOTS-ON-THE-GROUND ACT

                               H.R. 3107

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish 
cybersecurity occupation classifications, assess the 
cybersecurity workforce, develop a strategy to address 
identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce, and for other 
purposes.
Summary

    H.R. 3107 directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to 
establish cybersecurity occupation classifications and to 
ensure that such classifications may be used throughout the 
Department and are made available to other federal agencies. 
H.R. 3107 also requires the Secretary to create a workforce 
strategy that enhances the readiness, capacity, training, 
recruitment, and retention of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) cybersecurity workforce, including a multi-phase 
recruitment plan and a 10-year projection of federal workforce 
needs. This legislation would also create a process to verify 
that employees of independent contractors who serve in DHS 
cybersecurity positions receive initial and recurrent 
information security and role-based security training 
commensurate with assigned responsibilities.
Legislative History
    H.R. 3107 was introduced in the House on September 17, 
2013, by Ms. Clarke, and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 3107 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies.
    On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R. 
3107 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a 
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 3107 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 3107 to the House on December 
12, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-294.

                              ----------                              


                 Oversight Activities of the Committee

    After the attacks of September 11, 2001, President George 
W. Bush declared: ``We're fighting a new kind of war against 
determined enemies. And public servants long into the future 
will bear the responsibility to defend Americans against 
terror.'' Over a decade later, our enemies continue to evolve 
and we must continue to adapt. The Department of Homeland 
Security's structure and capabilities continue to mature. The 
Department has a large role in defending our Nation from 
vulnerabilities our enemies wish to exploit. It is this 
Committee's responsibility pursuant to House Rule X, Clause 
3(g) to ``review and study on a continuing basis all Government 
activities relating to homeland security, including the 
interaction of all departments and agencies with the Department 
of Homeland Security.'' In addition, the Committee is to 
``review and study on a primary and continuing basis all 
Government activities, programs and organizations related to 
homeland security that fall within its primary legislative 
jurisdiction.''

                        THREATS TO THE HOMELAND

    The Committee has continued to focus on the present and 
persistent threat of terrorism. Scattered across the map are an 
increasing number of individuals and organizations sympathetic 
to al-Qaeda's message, reaching out to al Qaeda operatives, and 
embracing their radical view.
    On February 13, 2013, the Committee held a hearing entitled 
``A New Perspective on Threats to the Homeland.'' The Committee 
received testimony from ADM Thad Allen (Ret. USCG), Senior Vice 
President, Booz Allen Hamilton; Mr. Shawn Henry, President, 
CrowdStrike Services; Hon. Michael E. Leiter, Private Citizen; 
Hon. David M. Walker, Founder and CEO, The Comeback America 
Initiative; and Mr. Clark Kent Ervin, Partner, Patton Boggs, 
LLP. The Committee will maintain its heightened focus on the 
threat of terrorism from both within the Homeland and abroad, 
and will continue to conduct rigorous oversight of efforts to 
combat those threats.
    The National Network of Fusion Centers (Network) was 
developed in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to close 
the gaps in information sharing between Federal, State, and 
local law enforcement and emergency responders. Currently, the 
Network includes 78 fusion centers across 49 states, three 
territories and the District of Columbia. On July 26, 2013, the 
Committee released a Majority Staff Report entitled ``The 
National Network of Fusion Centers,'' detailing the Committee's 
findings and recommendations developed from a comprehensive 
study of fusions centers across the Nation. The report 
concludes months of work by the Committee which included visits 
to 32 fusion centers, in addition to briefings and discussions 
with Federal partners and the National Fusion Center 
Association. The Committee's review concludes that the Network 
is not functioning as cohesively as it should be and fusion 
centers are facing numerous challenges that prevent the Network 
from realizing its full potential to help secure the Homeland. 
The Committee will continue to work with Federal, State, and 
local stakeholders in an effort to further mature and develop 
the Network as a national homeland security asset.
    Boko Harman is an Islamic jihadist militant organization 
based in the northeast of Nigeria, north Cameroon and Niger 
that seeks to establish a ``pure'' Islamic state ruled by 
sharia law, putting a stop to what it deems ``Westernization.'' 
Boko Haram has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to waging 
violent jihad. The organization's growing capacity and alliance 
with al-Qaeda make it a threat to the Homeland and U.S. 
interests abroad. In September, The Chair of the Full Committee 
and the Chairs of the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and 
Intelligence, and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, 
Infrastructure Protection, and Intelligence, released a report 
entitled ``Boko Haram: Growing Threat to the U.S. Homeland.'' 
The Committee concluded that designating Boko Haram Foreign 
Terrorist Organization (FTO) will ensure support for the 
group's activities is prohibited by law. The Department of 
State designated Boko Haram a FTO on November 13, 2013.
    Throughout the First Session, Members of the Committee 
received regular monthly classified briefings from the National 
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), the Department of Homeland 
Security, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to stay 
current on the latest intelligence and threats to the homeland.

                          THE BOSTON BOMBINGS

    On April 15, 2013, two improvised explosive devices 
detonated near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. This 
attack killed three innocent victims and injured an estimated, 
260 others. Local police, fire departments, medical personnel, 
members of the National Guard, as well as the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), and officials from the Department of 
Homeland Security (DHS) responded to the scene, and began the 
hunt for those responsible.
    The suspects, identified several days later as Tamerlan and 
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, were eventually cornered in Watertown, 
Massachusetts in the early hours of Friday, April 19, 2013. 
Tamerlan Tsarnaev sustained fatal injuries during his attempt 
to flee authorities, while his younger brother evaded capture 
for another several hours by hiding in a nearby boat. In the 
aftermath of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's arrest and his brother's 
death, the Committee--responding to public reports that 
Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been previously identified as a potential 
terrorist threat--initiated an investigation into what Federal 
agencies knew about the danger he posed and what was done with 
that information.
    Though this review continues, the Committee is preparing to 
release a report to document findings and recommendations based 
on this attack to improve the security of the United States 
Homeland. This effort has resulted in multiple briefings from 
representatives of DHS, and FBI, as well as other Federal 
officials, discussion with State and local law enforcement, 
document requests and multiple Committee hearings and site 
visits.
    On May 9, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled 
``The Boston Bombings: A First Look.'' The Committee received 
testimony from Hon. Joseph I. Lieberman, former Senator from 
the State of Connecticut; Mr. Edward F. Davis, III, 
Commissioner, Boston Police Department; Hon. Kurt N. Schwartz, 
Undersecretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, 
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and Dr. Erroll G. Southers, 
Professor and Associate Director of Research Transition, DHS 
National Center for Risk & Economic Analysis of Terrorism 
Events (CREATE), Sol Price School of Public Policy, University 
of Southern California. After the initial assessment from the 
hearing, the Committee traveled twice to Boston to meet with 
representatives from the Boston Police Department, DHS, and the 
Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). Additionally, the Committee 
met with the Intelligence Community Inspector General to 
coordinate investigative efforts.
    The Committee continued its examination into the Boston 
bombings with a hearing on July 10 and 11, 2013, entitled 
``Assessing Attacks on the Homeland: From Fort Hood to 
Boston.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. Rudolph 
``Rudy'' W. Giuliani, former Mayor, New York City; Hon. Michael 
Leiter, former Director, National Counterterrorism Center; Dr. 
Bruce Hoffman, Professor and Director, Center for Peace and 
Security Studies and Security, Georgetown University; Hon. John 
Cohen, Deputy Counterterrorism Coordinator and Senior Advisor 
to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and 
Hon. Matthew G. Olsen, Director, National Counterterrorism 
Center. Due to the sensitive nature of some of the testimony, 
portions of this hearing were held in Executive Session.
    The Committee on Homeland Security continues its 
investigation into the actions of the Federal Government prior 
to the Boston bombing and post bombing. The Committee has sent 
a series of letters to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the 
Department of Homeland Security, and the National 
Counterterrorism Center on their particular actions and 
insights into the terrorists and events that occurred prior to 
the attack. Additionally Members of the Committee and staff 
have received a series of briefings regarding the bombing and 
information sharing between agencies. Committee staff traveled 
to Moscow, the Russian Federation and Georgia to investigate 
Tamerlan Tsarnaev's travel and speak with officials on the 
ground to gain insight into the radicalization of the suspects. 
The Committee's investigation is on-going.

           IMPLICATIONS OF SYRIA CRISIS ON HOMELAND SECURITY

    In August 2013, the Syria government used chemical agents 
on civilians in the Ghouta area of Damascus. As the United 
States and its allies considered an international military 
response, the Committee held numerous meetings and briefings to 
understand what happened and what this meant for the security 
of the Nation. On September 10, 2013, the Committee held a 
hearing entitled ``Crisis in Syria: Implications for Homeland 
Security.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. 
Christopher Shays, Former Representative in Congress from the 
4th District of Connecticut; Major General Robert H. Scales, 
Jr. (Ret. U.S. Army), former Commandant of the U.S. Army War 
College; Mr. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior Fellow, Foundation for 
Defense of Democracies; and Dr. Stephen Biddle, Adjunct Senior 
Fellow for Defense Policy, Council on Foreign Relations. The 
Committee will continue to closely monitor the Syrian crisis, 
particularly to understand potential threats to the Homeland 
from foreign fighters and the possibility of chemical weapons 
falling into extremists' hands.

              EFFECTS OF WESTERNERS JOINING TERROR GROUPS

    In September 2013, Americans watched as hundreds ran for 
cover and 68 people were murdered by vicious terrorists 
invading a shopping mall in the Republic of Kenya. Terrorizing 
these innocent people were al-Shabaab militants, a designated 
Foreign Terrorist Organization. The most striking concern for 
Americans is that within the ranks of al-Shabaab are Americans, 
including 40 to 50 known fighters who have previously resided 
in the U.S. to fight alongside these jihadists in Africa and 
the Middle East. More than one hundred Americans are known to 
be fighting overseas in support of terrorist organizations, 
from the Middle East and Africa.
    On October 9, 2013, the Committee held a hearing entitled 
``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How Westerners Joining Terror 
Groups Overseas Affect the Homeland.'' The Committee received 
testimony from Prof. Michael Scheuer, Adjunct Professor, Center 
for Peace and Security Studies, Georgetown University, 
testifying on his own behalf; Ms. Lauren Ploch Blanchard, 
Specialist in African Affairs, Congressional Research Service, 
The Library of Congress; Mr. Brett Lovegrove, Chief Executive, 
City Security and Resilience Network (CSARN); Mr. Richard W. 
Stanek, Sheriff, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Mr. Richard 
Mellor, Vice President, Loss Prevention, National Retail 
Federation; and Ms. Stephanie Sanok Kostro, Senior Fellow and 
Acting Director, Homeland Security and Counterterrorism 
Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies.

                            BORDER SECURITY

    Border security is about much more than illegal 
immigration; it is about safeguarding this country from 
terrorism, drug cartels, weapons and human smuggling and 
protecting the free flow of legitimate trade. It is more 
important than ever to know who and what is coming into the 
United States. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has 
never created a national strategy to secure our borders. In the 
absence of a complete border security strategy that encompasses 
the entire border, illicit cross-border activity quickly adapts 
and moves when isolated areas are secured. Throughout the First 
Session, the Committee has actively examined the key elements 
of border security including the definition of a secure border, 
border security metrics and measures, visa security and 
overstays, the implementation of a biometric exit system, cargo 
security, maritime security, and the future of the 
Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC).
    As the Senate considered reform of the U.S. immigration 
system, the Committee examined proposals to enhance border 
security. S. 7.44, the Senate's immigration bill included some 
provisions related to border security. The Senate's approach 
puts a heavy emphasis on spending resources, with limited 
accountability or ability to measure outcomes of those applied 
resources. The Senate bill spends an additional $46 billion 
dollars to: Double the size of the U.S. Border Patrol; build 
additional miles of fence; and purchase new technology. H.R. 
1417, the Committee's border security legislation, calls for a 
strategy and an implementation plan to be produced prior to the 
expenditure of additional resources. It also requires metrics 
to increase accountability, and applies a standard of no less 
than 90 percent effectiveness to hold the Department 
accountable. For further action on H.R. 1417, see discussion 
above.
    Members of the Committee conducted a site visit to the 
Southwest Border from August 3 through 6, 2013. The purpose of 
the site visit was to examine current border security 
conditions, including the maritime environment. Members 
experienced operations in the maritime domain, urban 
environment border security infrastructure, Unmanned Aerial 
Vehicle (UAV) operations, and border security challenges in the 
Rio Grande Valley. In San Diego, California, Members examined 
U. S. Coast Guard port security operations, conducted an aerial 
tour of the international border, and a ground operational 
environment and infrastructure tour.
    While in Tucson, Arizona, Members toured various facilities 
including: the Tucson Joint Field Command and Predator 
Operations Center; a demonstration of advanced Integrated Fixed 
Tower technologies, in Sasabe; and received an overview of UAV 
operations at Fort Huachuca.
    Members then traveled to Texas to the Rio Grande Valley to 
participate in border terrain tours with local law enforcement, 
receive briefings on the South Texas Campaign and the Texas 
National Guard on RC-26 fixed-wing aerial detection and 
monitoring operations supporting the Department of Homeland 
Security.
    During this session, the Committee received updates on the 
Arizona Technology Plan and successfully pushed for the 
Department of Defense to re-deploy aerostats DHS for assessment 
in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. The Committee is optimistic 
that Mexican government reforms will provide new economic 
opportunities so that its citizens will choose stable, viable 
jobs, especially in the energy industry, instead of joining 
criminal cartels operating along the Mexico-United States 
Border. The Committee will continue to push the Department to 
secure our borders in the North, South, and the Caribbean 
region.

                 PROTECTING THE NATION'S CYBERSECURITY

    Other threats to our Nation do not cross our physical 
borders--they instead invade our digital networks. Cyber-
attacks are becoming an increasing threat to the homeland. 
Countries steal our military and intelligence information; 
there are threats of cyber-warfare from terrorists, economic 
cyber attacks from the Islamic Republic of Iran and the 
People's Republic of China and, even the possibility of an 
attack upon our utilities is a growing vulnerability. Yet, 
while threats are imminent, no major cybersecurity legislation 
has been enacted since 2002. The Secretary of Homeland 
Security, was made responsible for ``coordinating the overall 
national effort to enhance the protection of our critical 
infrastructure'' when the Department itself was established. 
The National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) and 
Executive Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure 
Cybersecurity issued in February 2013 solidified the 
Department's role as the lead Federal entity in protecting 
domestic critical infrastructure.
    Upon issuance of Executive Order 13636 and Presidential 
Policy Directive (PPD)-21, Critical Infrastructure Security and 
Resilience, the Committee received briefings on these documents 
from DHS. On March 13, 2013, the Committee held a hearing 
entitled ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and Responsibilities to 
Protect the Nation's Critical Infrastructure.'' The Committee 
received testimony from Hon. Jane Holl Lute, Deputy Secretary, 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Anish B. Bhimani, 
Chairman, Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis 
Center; Mr. Gary W. Hayes, Chief Information Officer, 
Centerpoint Energy; and Ms. Michelle Richardson, Legislative 
Counsel, American Civil Liberties Union.
    The Committee spent considerable time developing 
cybersecurity legislation. Members and staff held hundreds of 
stakeholder meetings with the Department as well as technology 
and privacy organizations to get their insights and 
perspectives. The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure 
Protection and Security Technologies held numerous hearings on 
Executive Order 13636, the National Cybersecurity and 
Communications Integration Center (NCCIC), the Cybersecurity 
Framework, sharing threat information while ensuring privacy 
and civil liberties, partnering with the privacy sector, and 
coordinating a cyber incident response.
    As the Nation approached key Affordable Care Act milestones 
during 2013, the Committee raised security and privacy concerns 
prior to problems as healthcare.gov went live in October. The 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and 
Security Technologies held hearings in July and September on 
healthcare.gov and the Health Exchange Data Hub. On November 8, 
Committee staff also received a briefing from the U.S. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Office of 
Cybersecurity and Communications on Department of Homeland 
Security roles in the implementation of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. On November 13, 2013, the Full 
Committee held a hearing entitled ``Cyber Side-Effects: How 
Secure is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed 
Healthcare.gov?'' The Committee received testimony from Ms. 
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary, 
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Ms. Soraya Correa, Associate Director, 
Enterprise Services Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. 
Luke Chung, President, FMS, Inc.; and Mr. Waylon Krush, Chief 
Executive Officer, Lunarline, Inc. In preparation for this 
hearing, Committee staff met with stakeholders to discuss 
technical flaws with healthcare.gov.

                             DHS MANAGEMENT

    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Committee actively monitored the Department of Homeland 
Security's (DHS) management and operations to ensure that it is 
functioning more efficiently and is accountable to the American 
people. The Committee met with DHS headquarters and many 
components to examine management practices in acquisition, 
financial management, information technology, human capital, 
and employee integrity. During the First Session, the 
Department had to navigate the complex impacts of 
sequestration, the first government shutdown in the 
Department's young history, and significant senior leadership 
resignations. The Committee has been vocal about the need for 
key Department leadership positions to be filled. On March 5, 
2013, the Chairman and Ranking Member sent a letter the 
President urging him to swiftly appoint an Inspector General at 
DHS. With over 40 percent of the senior leadership positions 
vacant, the Chairman wrote an opinion editorial discussing DHS 
leadership vacancies that appeared in the Monday, November 11, 
2013, edition of The Wall Street Journal.
    On December 12, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing 
entitled ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications of Leadership 
Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.'' The Committee received 
testimony from Hon. Tom J. Ridge, Former Secretary, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Max Stier, President and 
CEO, Partnership for Public Service; Mr. David C. Maurer, 
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government 
Accountability Office; and Ms. Colleen M. Kelley, National 
President, The National Treasury Employees Union.
    As part of the Committee's oversight responsibilities, 
Committee staff reviewed the President's budget request for the 
Department of Homeland Security for Fiscal Year 2014, and on 
April 18, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled 
``The President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the Department of 
Homeland Security.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. 
Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.
    In light of the Government Accountability Office's (GAO) 
2013 High-Risk report which identified financial management 
within the Department as high risk, on February 20, 2013, the 
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight 
and Management Efficiency, and the Subcommittee on 
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
Technologies, sent a letter to DHS's Chief Financial Officer 
regarding the Department's financial management systems and 
efforts to obtain a clean audit opinion on its financial 
statements. The Department provided a response to this letter 
on March 8, 2013. On March 11, 2013, Committee staff received a 
briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer. The GAO issued its 
report DHS Financial Management: Additional Efforts Needed to 
Resolve Deficiencies in Internal Controls and Financial 
Management Systems on September 30, 2013, [GAO-13-561]. The 
report contained four recommendations for executive action. On 
July 8, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from DHS's 
Chief Financial Officer regarding DHS's efforts to modernize 
its financial systems. To further examine these issues, on 
November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
Efficiency held a hearing entitled ``DHS Financial Management: 
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Asif Khan, Director, 
Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office; and Ms. Anne Richards, Assistant 
Inspector General for Audits, Office of Inspector General, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was 
to examine relevant GAO and Inspector General findings on DHS 
financial practices, including steps to obtain a clean audit 
opinion and implement financial management systems.
    On August 1, 2013, the Undersecretary for Management, the 
Chief Procurement Officer, the Acting Chief Information 
Officer, and other senior officials briefed Committee staff on 
the status of the Department's acquisition management efforts. 
As a follow up, on September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on 
Oversight and Management Efficiency held a hearing entitled 
``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers 
Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons Learned.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael Borras, 
Undersecretary for Management, Department of Homeland Security; 
Ms. Michele Mackin, Director, Government Accountability Office; 
Ms. Anne Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, DHS 
Office of Inspector General; Mr. William C. Greenwalt, Visiting 
Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; Mr. Stan Soloway, 
President and CEO, Professional Services Council; Mr. David 
Berteau, Senior Vice President, Center for Strategic and 
International Studies. The purpose of the hearing was to 
examine DHS's acquisition practices to determine if the 
Department is effectively implementing its policies and to 
assess whether DHS could leverage best practices and lessons 
learned from the Defense Department and the private sector. On 
November 5, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency raised 
concerns, in a letter to the Chief Procurement Officer, over 
the Department's Enterprise Acquisition Gateway for Leading 
Edge Solutions II (EAGLE II) and requested additional 
information. The Department provided a written response on 
December 2, 2013.
    The Committee reviewed the authorities and activities of 
the Chief Information Officer (CIO) to ensure the effective 
management and coordination of key IT systems planning, 
investment management, cloud computing, data consolidating, 
operations, policy development, and related personnel 
management. The Committee also examined component CIOs--
particularly Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and United States 
Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS)--and their efforts to 
modernize and implement critical IT systems supporting our 
border agents and immigration officers. On February 21, 2013, 
Committee staff received a briefing from DHS Office of 
Inspector General concerning their ongoing IT Audits and IT 
management issues. Committee staff also received briefings from 
representatives from DHS, including: The DHS Chief Information 
Officer; USCIS, including the USCIS Chief Information Officer; 
CBP; and ICE, including the ICE Chief Information Officer. The 
Committee reviewed the Department's efforts to address 
information technology (IT) challenges, including the 
management and integration of the Department's IT systems. The 
Committee monitored the Department's progress in IT 
architectural planning, investment management, and cloud 
computing. On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS 
Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration 
Laws?'' The purpose of the hearing was to assess how IT 
resources are being effectively utilized to help secure our 
borders and uphold immigration laws and how the Department is 
exercising proper management and oversight of its IT 
investments. The Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency 
additionally requested on May 23, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing 
GAO review of the TECS modernization program--the Treasury 
Enforcement Communication System. Committee staff also received 
a briefing from the Office of Inspector General regarding its 
investigation related to the DHS Chief Information Officer. On 
August 22, 2013, Committee staff were briefed by the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on its 
transportation infrastructure modernization efforts, which 
seeks to update TSA IT infrastructure in maritime, surface, and 
aviation environments.
    On November 14, 2013, DHS officials briefed the Committee 
on their approach to Integrated Investment Life Cycle 
Management (IILCM). The IILCM is the Department's 
transformational concept to integrate all phases of the 
Department's multi-billion dollar budget and investment/
acquisition management process. The framework provides critical 
linkages between Strategy, Capabilities and Requirements, 
Programming and Budgeting, and Investment Oversight phases to 
ensure the effective execution of Federal funds to support 
strategic priorities. The IILCM was signed into policy by 
Secretary Napolitano in February 2013 and the framework is 
being piloted through March 2014 using the cybersecurity, 
biodefense, and common vetting portfolios. The Committee will 
continue to monitor the progress of these pilot initiatives.
    On November 15, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and 
the Subcommittees sent a letter to the Acting Secretary to 
ensure the second Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR) 
addresses critical homeland security issues and relevant 
recommendations. During the second session, the Committee 
eagerly awaits the completion of the second QHSR to set the 
priorities and direction of the Department in the coming years.

                         FY 2014 BUDGET REQUEST

    As part of the Committee's oversight responsibilities, 
Committee staff reviewed the President's budget request for the 
Department of Homeland Security for Fiscal Year 2014, and on 
April 18, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled 
``The President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the Department of 
Homeland Security.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. 
Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.
    Based on a Committee staff review of the President's budget 
request for FY 2014 and testimony received, the Committee 
completed its Views and Estimates of the President's budget 
request and submitted them to the House Budget Committee for 
its consideration.

                   2014 WINTER OLYMPIC GAMES SECURITY

    On November 6 and 7, 2013, the Committee sent a staff 
delegation to visit Sochi, Russian Federation, to investigate 
security at the 2014 Olympic game venues and determine how the 
Department of Homeland Security may support this event. Because 
of the heightened security concerns surrounding the Olympic 
games, the Committee is considering a future hearing on DHS' 
role in supporting the security of approximately 15,000 
Americans, both athletes and visitors, at the Olympics. The 
Committee is also investigating the threats from the Caucasus 
Emirate (Imarat Kavkaz--Russian name), a Chechnyan terrorist 
group affiliated with al-Qaeda, which has threatened the 2014 
Winter Olympic games.

                              ----------                              


                      Full Committee Hearings Held

``A New Perspective on Threats to the Homeland.'' February 13, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-1)
``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and Responsibilities to Protect the 
        Nation's Critical Infrastructure.'' March 6, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-4)
``The President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the Department of 
        Homeland Security.'' April 18, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
        11)
``The Boston Bombings: A First Look.'' May 9, 2013. (Serial No. 
        113-16)
``Assessing Attacks on the Homeland: From Fort Hood to 
        Boston.'' July 10 and 11, 2013. (Serial No. 113-16)
``Crisis in Syria: Implications for Homeland Security.'' 
        September 10, 2013. (Serial No. 113-32)
``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How Westerners Joining Terror 
        Groups Overseas Affect the Homeland.'' October 9, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-38)
``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure is the Personal Information 
        Entered into the Flawed Healthcare.gov?'' November 13, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-41)
``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications of Leadership Vacancies on 
        the Mission and Morale.'' December 12, 2013. (Serial 
        No. 113-46)
           Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence held four 
hearings, receiving testimony from 19 witnesses.

                              ----------                              


               Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee



          WMD INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SHARING ACT OF 2013

                                H.R.1542

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish weapons 
of mass destruction intelligence and information sharing 
functions of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the 
Department of Homeland Security and to require dissemination of 
information analyzed by the Department to entities with 
responsibilities relating to homeland security, and for other 
purposes.

Summary

    This legislation requires the Department of Homeland 
Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis to support the 
analysis and dissemination of information regarding threats 
involving chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear 
weapons throughout the Department and among other Federal, 
State, local, and private sector partners.

Legislative History

112th Congress
    H.R.2764 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2011, by 
Mr.Meehan, Ms.Speier, Mr.Pascrell, Mr.Marino, Mr.King of New 
York, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred to the Committee 
on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2764 was 
referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and 
Intelligence.
    The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence 
considered H.R.2764 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the 
measure to be reported to the Full Committee with a favorable 
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R.2764 on March 28, 2012, 
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House, 
amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R.2764 to the House on May 8, 
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-466.
    The House considered H.R.2764 on May 30, 2012, under 
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
    H.R.2764 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs.

113th Congress
    H.R. 1542 was introduced in the House on April 24, 2013, by 
Mr.Meehan, Ms. Speier, Mr. McCaul, Mr. King of New York, and 
Mr.Higgins, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. 
Within the Committee, H.R. 1542 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
    The House considered H.R. 1542 under Suspension of the 
Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 388 yeas 
and 3 nays, (Roll No. 375).
    H.R. 1542 was received in the Senate on July 23, 2014, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs.

                              ----------                              


                Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee


                     U.S. COUNTERTERRORISM STRATEGY

    The Subcommittee continued its review of homeland security 
and counterterrorism efforts across the Federal Government to 
counter the threat from al-Qaeda and other terrorist networks.
    The Committee conducted a series of meetings, briefings, 
and site visits to review U.S. counterterrorism efforts aimed 
at disrupting and reducing threats to the U.S. homeland from 
al-Qaeda and other Islamic terror groups.
    On May 21, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
New York City, New York (NYC) to discuss ongoing 
counterterrorism activities and coordination efforts between 
NYC and the Department of Homeland Security.
    On June 4, 2013, Committee staff met with former U.S. 
Government intelligence officials regarding counterterrorism 
strategies, as well as current and potential future terror 
threats.
    On July 30, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
the Department of Homeland Security, Office of Bombing 
Prevention to discuss their role and capability in providing 
training and information to State and local law enforcement 
regarding identifying and disabling improvised explosive 
devices (IEDs). The tragic events of April 15, 2013, where 
terrorists exploded two IEDs at the Boston Marathon, as well as 
the growing use of vehicle-born improvised explosive devices, 
highlight the need for the Nation to increase efforts to detect 
and disable these devices.
    On September 10, 2013, Committee staff attended a 
conference hosted by the American Enterprise Institute on the 
current capabilities of al-Qaeda and what changes are necessary 
to the current counterterror strategies moving forward.
    On October 28, 2013, Committee staff received a classified 
briefing from Department of Homeland Security officials 
regarding the Department's roles and responsibilities related 
to terrorism detainees held at Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, 
Cuba.

               THREATS TO THE U.S. HOMELAND FROM AL-QAEDA

    The Committee has examined the continued threat to the U.S. 
homeland from: Al Qaeda core; al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula 
(AQAP); al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM); and other 
emerging allied and affiliated organizations.
    On May 22, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Assessing the Threat to the Homeland from al-Qaeda Operations 
in Iran and Syria.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from 
Seth G. Jones, Ph.D., Associate Director, International 
Security and Defense Policy Center; Mr. Robin Simcox, Research 
Fellow, The Henry Jackson Society; Mr. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior 
Fellow, Foundation for the Defense of Democracies; and Mr. 
Barak Barfi, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
    In preparation for the May 22nd hearing, Committee staff 
met with a number of outside experts on the situation in the 
Syrian Arab Republic and potential threats to the Nation. These 
meetings include the Institute of the Study of War on May 8, 
2013, the RAND Corporation on May 10, 2013, and the Henry 
Jackson Society on May 14, 2013.
    On June 27, 2103, Members of the Subcommittee received a 
classified briefing on terror threats to the Homeland. Members 
were briefed by representatives from the Department of Homeland 
Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
    The Subcommittee conducted oversight after an al-Qaeda-
linked threat report in August 2013, lead to the closure of 
nearly two-dozen U.S. Embassies across the Middle East and 
North Africa for approximately one week with the U.S. Embassy 
in Sanaa, the Yemeni Republic remaining closed for two weeks. 
Committee staff met with numerous Government and private sector 
experts on the threat information and the relationship between 
al-Qaeda senior leadership and the affiliate organizations, 
particularly AQAP.
    On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Understanding the Threat to the Homeland from 
AQAP.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Frank J. 
Cilluffo, Associate Vice President, Director, Homeland Security 
Policy Institute and Co-Director, Cyber Center for National and 
Economic Security, The George Washington University.; Ms. 
Katherine Zimmerman, Senior Analyst Critical Threats Project, 
The American Enterprise Institute; and Mr. Brian Katulis, 
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.

                         AL QAEDA IN THE SINAI

    On October 21 and 22, 2013, Committee staff met with 
outside experts from the Washington Institute for Near East 
Policy on the presence and capability of jihadist entities in 
the Arab Republic of Egypt, particularly in the Sinai 
Peninsula. The meetings included a discussion of the impact of 
Administration's decision to limit military aid to Egypt.
    On October 30, 2013, Committee staff met with experts from 
the Council on Foreign Relations regarding security concerns in 
the Sinai and the potential threat to the U.S. Homeland and 
western interests from terrorist groups operating in the 
region.

                MUMBAI-STYLE ATTACKS AND LASHKAR-E-TAIBA

    On June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks and the 
Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Mr. Joseph W. Pfeifer, Chief of Counterterrorism 
and Emergency Preparedness, Fire Department of New York; C. 
Christine Fair, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Georgetown 
University, Security Studies Program in the Edumnd A. Walsh 
School of Foreign Service; Stephen Tankel, Ph.D., Assistant 
Professor, American University and Nonresident Scholar, South 
Asia Program, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; and 
Jonah Blank, Ph.D., Senior Political Analyst, The RAND 
Corporation.
    In preparation for the June 12th hearing, Committee staff 
met with a number of outside experts regarding the capability 
and intentions of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Additionally, the 
Committee staff received a classified briefing on June 5, 2013, 
and met with representatives from the Combating Terrorism 
Center at West Point U.S. Military Academy regarding the threat 
to the homeland posed by LeT.

                               AL SHABAAB

    The Subcommittee continued its review of the terror threat 
posed by Somali-based al-Shabaab. On September 21, 2013, 
terrorists entered the Westgate mall in Nairobi, the Republic 
of Kenya and killed almost 70 and injured over 200 people 
during a four-day period. Al-Shabaab has claimed responsibility 
for the attack.
    On September 30, 2013, Committee staff met with an expert 
from the Atlantic Council regarding threats from al-Shabaab and 
lessons learned regarding the intentions and capability from 
the group after the Westgate Mall terror attack.

                               BOKO HARAM

    The Subcommittee has conducted extensive oversight over the 
Nigerian terror group Boko Haram and the U.S. process for 
designating foreign terrorist organizations (FTO).
    On September 13, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee, 
and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and 
the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection 
and Security Technologies, sent an oversight letter to the 
Department of State urging the Department to move forward with 
a FTO designation for Boko Haram and Ansar al Sharia, a 
splinter group.
    On September 11, 2013, Committee staff met with officials 
from the Department of Defense's African Command regarding 
capabilities and threats to the Nation from Boko Haram.
    On September 13, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and 
the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies released a report on the growing threat 
to the homeland from Boko Haram. The Members shared a copy of 
the report in a letter to the Secretary of State.
    On September 30, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee and 
the Chair of the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, 
and Trade of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, requested 
the Government Accountability Office conduct a review of the 
FTO designation process. The Department of State designated 
Boko Haram as an FTO on November 13, 2013.

             THREAT TO THE HOMELAND FROM IRAN AND HEZBOLLAH

    In February 2013, Committee staff met with a number of 
individuals from the Lebanese-American community to discuss the 
capability and threat posed by Hezbollah to the U.S. Homeland.
    On May 22, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Assessing the Threat to the Homeland from al-Qaeda Operations 
in Iran and Syria.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from 
Seth G. Jones, Ph.D., Associate Director, International 
Security and Defense Policy Center; Mr. Robin Simcox, Research 
Fellow, The Henry Jackson Society; Mr. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior 
Fellow, Foundation for the Defense of Democracies; and Mr. 
Barak Barfi, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
    In preparation for the May 22nd hearing, Committee staff 
met with a number of outside experts on the situation in Syria 
and potential threats to the U.S. Homeland. These meetings 
include the Institute of the Study of War on May 8, 2013, the 
RAND Corporation on May 10, 2013, and the Henry Jackson Society 
on May 14, 2013.

                       HOMEGROWN TERRORIST THREAT

    The Subcommittee continued oversight over the threat from 
homegrown extremists. On May 6, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Center regarding 
online radicalization recruitment. On July 8, 2013, Committee 
staff met with representatives from the Bipartisan Policy 
Center regarding the role the internet played in the 
radicalizing the terrorists involved in the Boston Bombings.

                            ECONOMIC THREATS

    The Subcommittee conducted oversight over the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) process, 
including review of a proposal by a state-owned foreign company 
to build a factory in the United States. Committee staff met 
with officials from CFIUS and the Intelligence Community, as 
well as representatives from the state where the factory was 
under consideration.

                            TERRORIST TRAVEL

    On January 17, 2013, Committee staff conducted a conference 
call with Department of Homeland Security personnel stationed 
overseas regarding the Visa Security Program and 
counterterrorism concerns.
    On February 25, 2013, Committee staff met with Department 
of Homeland Security personnel from Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) regarding their databases used to track travel 
into and out of the United States, as well as CBP's policies 
and procedures for creating and removing terrorist alerts.

                             TERROR FINANCE

    On January 17, 2013, Committee staff met with personnel 
from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding past and IRS 
investigations into terror finance cases. Additionally, the 
meeting included an overview of IRS policy and procedures for 
investigating non-profit entities with potential ties to 
terrorist organizations.

                      COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS

    On March 28, 2013, Committee staff met with the Defense 
Security Service within the Department of Defense regarding 
their annual classified trends analysis on counterintelligence 
threats across the Federal Government, including the Department 
of Homeland Security. This session, several individuals have 
damaged National security or committed tragic acts of violence, 
emphasizing the need for reforms and rigorous oversight over 
the security clearance process and programs to detect insider 
threats. In May 2013, Edward Snowden, a contractor with the 
National Security Agency, fled the U.S. to Hong Kong and later 
to the Russian Federation leaking a large amount of information 
on classified surveillance programs. On September 16, 2013, 
Aaron Alexis, a contractor with the Navy shot his way into the 
Washington D.C. Navy Yard and killed 12 people. Both of these 
individuals were vetted, trusted U.S. security professionals 
who abused that trust and committed heinous acts.
    The Department of Homeland Security has over 120,000 
employees holding security clearances. The Subcommittee 
conducted oversight over the Department of Homeland Security 
(DHS) and Federal processes for investigating and adjudicating 
security clearances.
    On September 27, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from the DHS Office of Security on the Department's process for 
requesting and adjudicating security clearances and suitability 
checks for employees, and how the Office coordinates with 
Department component agencies.
    On October 28, 2013, Committee staff received a classified 
briefing from the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis on 
their Counter Intelligence program.
    On October 24, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Assistant 
Commissioner for Internal Affairs regarding CBP programs. The 
briefing provided staff with information as to how the 
Department determines the suitability of employees, adjudicates 
security clearances, and manages the polygraph program.
    On November 1, 2013, Committee staff met with officials 
from the Government Accountability Office regarding 
vulnerabilities in the security clearance process.
    On November 12, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives from a private company with contracts to 
conduct security clearance background investigations for the 
Office of Personnel Management and DHS.
    On November 13, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``The Insider Threat to Homeland Security: Examining 
Our Nation's Security Clearance Processes.'' The Subcommittee 
received testimony from Mr. Merton W. Miller, Associate 
Director of Investigations, Federal Investigative Services, 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management; Mr. Gregory Marshall, 
Chief Security Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 
Mr. Brian Prioletti, Assistant Director, Special Security 
Directorate, National Counterintelligence Executive, Office of 
Director of National Intelligence; and Ms. Brenda S. Farrell, 
Director, Defense Capabilities and Management, Military and DOD 
Civilian Personnel Issues, U.S. Government Accountability 
Office.

                   HOMELAND THREAT FROM A CBRN ATTACK

    On March 5, 2013, Committee staff received a classified 
briefing from the Federal Bureau of Investigations regarding 
the threat weapons of mass destruction pose to the Nation.
    On April 12, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) to examine 
resources in their FY 2014 budget request.
    On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, Biological, 
Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the Homeland.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Richard Daddario, 
Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism, New York City Police 
Department; Dr. Huban Gowadia, Acting Director, Domestic 
Nuclear Detection Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 
Mr. Scott McAllister, Deputy Under Secretary, State and Local 
Program Officer, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security; and Dr. Leonard Cole, Newark, 
New Jersey.
    On May 16, 2013, Committee staff met with experts from 
Sandia National Laboratories regarding the threat from 
biological pathogens and the threat to the Homeland.
    The Subcommittee discharged H.R. 1542, the WMD Intelligence 
and Information Sharing Act of 2013, legislation designed to 
address the issue of CBRN attacks. This bill passed the House 
on July 22, 2013, for further information, see the discussion 
of this measure listed above.
    On September 6, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Center regarding a 
new report on emerging threats.

               HOMELAND SECURITY INTELLIGENCE ENTERPRISE

    The Subcommittee held multiple briefings with officials 
from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of 
Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) to examine the structure, 
mission, and capability of the office, as well as I&As role in 
coordinating intelligence within DHS and State and local law 
enforcement.
    On March 22, 2013, Committee staff received a classified 
briefing with officials from I&A regarding the DHS Intelligence 
Enterprise and how intelligence analysis responsibilities are 
divided between components of the Department.
    On April 12, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the Office of 
Operations regarding their FY 2014 budget request and the 
mission, resources, and capabilities of their respective 
offices.
    On May 17, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding the capabilities 
and policies related to the primary database used by CBP to 
track travel in and out of the U.S. and identifying potential 
terrorists.
    On June 6, 2013, Committee staff received a classified 
briefing from officials at the National Counterterrorism Center 
regarding terrorist watchlisting protocols and information 
sharing.
    On July 12, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from the Government Accountability Office regarding a Committee 
requested report on the DHS Intelligence Enterprise.
    On July 16, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement regarding the agency's 
analytic framework for intelligence.
    On July 17, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
the Federal Bureau of Investigations regarding the network of 
Joint Terrorism Task Forces.

                          INFORMATION SHARING

    The Subcommittee conducted extensive oversight over 
information sharing between Federal, State, and local law 
enforcement.
    On March 28, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
the National Fusion Center Association.
    On April 15, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from 
the Department of Homeland Security regarding the National 
Network of Fusion Centers.
    On May 17, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from the Government Accountability Office regarding their 
ongoing work reviewing information sharing and counterterrorism 
activities between the Joint Terrorism Task Forces and Fusion 
Centers.
    On June 17, 2013, Committee staff met with the Director of 
Analysis for the Office of Intelligence and Analysis within the 
Department of Homeland Security to receive a briefing on the 
size and mission of the office. The briefing included an 
overview of new intelligence products and information sharing 
efforts with State and local law enforcement.
    On June 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a classified threat 
briefing for Members on terror threats to the Homeland. 
Representatives from the Department of Homeland Security, 
Office of Intelligence and Analysis provided the threat 
briefing and an overview of the analytical products produced by 
their office, as well as discussed the process by which threat 
information is shared with State and local law enforcement 
officials.
    On July 26, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee released a Majority Staff Report entitled ``The 
National Network of Fusion Centers,'' detailing the Committee's 
findings and recommendations developed from a comprehensive 
study of fusions centers across the country. In developing the 
report, Committee staff conducted numerous briefings and site 
visits with Fusion Centers, the Department of Homeland 
Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and other 
entities.
    On September 25, 2013, Committee staff met with officials 
from the Department of Homeland Security regarding the 2012 
National Network of Fusion Centers Assessment.
    On November 14, 2013, Committee staff met with Federal, 
State, and local law enforcement regarding security measures 
and information sharing efforts in advance of Super Bowl XLVIII 
to be played on February 2, 2014.

                        NATIONAL SECURITY LEAKS

    Following up on a Committee investigation into the homeland 
security impacts of national security leaks that began in the 
112th Congress, the Subcommittee held numerous briefings and 
oversight letters. This includes February 13, 2013 and a June 
18, 2013 meetings with the Department of Defense (DOD) 
Inspector General's Office regarding their review of the DOD 
policies and procedures for working with the media and movie 
producers.

                              ----------                              


                       Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, Biological, 
        Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the 
        Homeland.'' March 23, 2013. (Serial No. 113-12)
``Assessing the Threat to the Homeland from al-Qaeda Operations 
        in Iran and Syria.'' May 22, 2013. (Serial No. 113-19)
``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks and the 
        Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.'' June 12, 2013. (Serial 
        No. 113-21)
``Understanding the Threat to the Homeland from AQAP.'' 
        September 18, 2013. (Serial No. 113-34)
``The Insider Threat to Homeland Security: Examining Our 
        Nation's Security Clearance Processes.'' November 13, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-42)
              Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security held seven 
hearings, receiving testimony from 29 witnesses, and considered 
one measure.

                              ----------                              


               Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee



                  BORDER SECURITY RESULTS ACT OF 2013

                           H.R. 1417 (S. 683)

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a 
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control 
of the international borders of the United States, and for 
other purposes.

Summary

    H.R. 1417 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to 
develop a comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain 
situational awareness and operational control of the border, 
and sets the requirement of achieving operational control in 
high traffic areas within two years and nine months of 
enactment and across the entire Southwest border within five 
years. Operational control of the border, as defined by the 
bill, means a condition where there is a 90 percent 
effectiveness rate for the apprehension of illegal border 
crossers and a significant reduction in the movement of illicit 
drugs and other contraband.
    This legislation sets the requirements for the Secretary to 
consider when developing the strategy; outlines the benchmarks 
and timetables for achieving situational awareness and 
operational control; and requires metrics to measure 
effectiveness. H.R. 1417 also requires the Secretary to issue a 
baseline assessment of the current level of situational 
awareness and operational control of the border and 
periodically thereafter until the border is deemed to be under 
operational control. Following the baseline assessment, the 
Secretary would be required to submit a comprehensive strategy 
and subsequent plan to gain situational awareness and 
operational control. The plan would be comprised of 
implementation plans for each of the Department's border 
security components and a comprehensive border security 
technology plan outlining a justification for technology 
choices and a timetable for procurement and deployment. This 
legislation also calls for periodic updates of the strategy and 
implementation plan following the publication of future 
Quadrennial Homeland Security Review.
    H.R. 1417 requires the Secretary to implement a series of 
metrics to measure the effectiveness of security between the 
ports of entry, at ports of entry, and in the maritime 
environment. H.R. 1417 also requires a Department of Homeland 
Security National Laboratory and a Department of Homeland 
Security Center of Excellence to provide an independent 
assessment of the suitability of the metrics the Department 
develops, and to make recommendations for additional metrics to 
measure border security effectiveness.
    Finally, the legislation requires the Government 
Accountability Office to review and report to Congress on the 
suitability and validity of the Secretary's strategy, plan, 
metrics, and the certification of operational control.

Legislative History

    H.R. 1417 was introduced in the House on April 9, 2013, by 
Mr. McCaul, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Mr. 
Thompson of Mississippi and referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1417 was referred 
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security. S. 683, 
the Senate companion measure was introduced on April 9, 2013, 
and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs. The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime 
Security considered
    H.R. 1417 on April 24, 2013, and ordered the measure 
reported to the Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, 
as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee on Homeland Security considered H.R. 1417 on 
May 15, 2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the 
House with a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice 
vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1417 to the House on May 20, 
2013 as H. Rpt. 113-87, and placed on the Union Calendar, 
Calendar No. 62.

                              ----------                              


                Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee


                             SECURE BORDER

    Security of the Nation hinges in large part on how well the 
Department of Homeland Security can control who and what comes 
into this country. A porous border is a conduit for not only 
drug smugglers and human traffickers, but is also a 
vulnerability that terrorists may exploit. The Department's 
lack of a comprehensive national strategy to secure the border 
and no defined measurable goals limits its ability to fulfill 
this critical mission. The number of Border Patrol agents, 
miles of fence, and various technology that Congress has funded 
to help shore up security at the border is a means to an end. 
The border is not necessarily ``secure'' because 21,370 agents 
are on the border, nor is it necessarily secure because 
apprehensions are the lowest they have been since the 1970s. 
Instead, the Department must define the characteristics of a 
secure border and establish a desired border security end-state 
the Department can plan for and execute against.
    On February 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``What Does a Secure Border Look Like?'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Michael J. Fisher, 
Chief, Border Patrol, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. 
Kevin McAleenan, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field 
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of 
Homeland Security; RAdm William D. Lee, Deputy For Operations 
Policy and Capabilities, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of 
Homeland Security; Ms. Rebecca Gambler, Acting Director, 
Homeland Security and Justice, Government Accountability 
Office; and Marc R. Rosenblum, PhD, Specialist in Immigration 
Policy, Congressional Research Service, The Library of 
Congress. The purpose of this hearing was to take a holistic 
look at the border to define what a secure border looks like, 
assess what the Department needs to do to achieve a secure 
border and how to measure border security progress.

                        STATE OF BORDER SECURITY

    More than ten years after the creation of the Department of 
Homeland Security, the Department does not have a comprehensive 
national strategy to secure the border. Since the attacks of 
September 11, 2001, Congress has appropriated billions of 
dollars to enhance border security, primarily through new 
investments in personnel, technology, and infrastructure. These 
investments were made without the benefit of a national border 
security strategy, so funds were often expended in an ad hoc 
way, without a well-defined end state. Achieving greater border 
security must be based on a solid understanding of current 
border threats, particularly as they relate to illegal border 
crossings and trafficking of contraband, and the coordination 
of components.
    Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations and 
Office of Air and Marine, Border Patrol, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Government 
Accountability Office, to discuss topics related to border 
security including: technology, strategy, metrics, and reuse of 
DoD equipment.
    On March 13, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee received 
a briefing on the state of border security. Representatives 
from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement, and the U.S. Coast Guard were present to 
provide Members with an update on border security efforts and 
respond to Member concerns. The purpose of this briefing was to 
better understand the current state of border security efforts 
from all the Department of Homeland Security components with a 
role in border security and to identify the need for a National 
strategy to secure the border.

                        BORDER SECURITY MEASURES

    In 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stopped 
reporting the number of miles border under ``operational 
control.'' Since that time, DHS has failed to introduce the 
``Border Condition Index'' (BCI), a new measure intended to 
demonstrate border security in a more holistic way, or another, 
alternative metric. Instead, the Department has relied on 
incomplete or inconsistent measures of border security 
progress, such as the resources sent to the border or the 
number of people apprehended. The development of outcome-based 
border security metrics at and between the ports of entry and 
in the maritime environment are necessary to increase 
confidence that the Nation's border security efforts are based 
on measurable data.
    Committee staff met with representatives from U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection Office of Field Operations and Office of 
Air and Marine, Border Patrol, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Government 
Accountability Office to discuss how the Department's border 
security components measure effectiveness.
    On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Measuring Outcomes to Understand the State of Border 
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. 
Michael J. Fisher, Chief, Border Patrol, Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. Kevin McAleenan, Acting Assistant Commissioner, 
Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Mark Borkowski, Assistant 
Commissioner, Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition, 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security; and Hon. Veronica Escobar, County Judge, El Paso 
County, Texas. The purpose of this hearing was to examine the 
status of the Border Condition Index (BCI), and further examine 
outcome-based ways to measure the state of border security.

                      VISA SECURITY AND OVERSTAYS

     Much of the focus on border security is devoted to the 
southwest border; however, estimates show approximately 40 
percent of the estimated 11-12 million aliens unlawfully 
present in the United States entered legally and subsequently 
overstayed their visas. According to the Department of Justice, 
approximately 10 percent of all the individuals who have been 
convicted on terrorism-related charges in the decade since the 
attacks of September 11, 2001, were legal visitors who 
overstayed their visas demonstrating a significant 
vulnerability. All of the 9/11 hijackers entered the United 
States on legally valid visas and at least four had overstayed 
or were in violation of their status.
    Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations, U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Government 
Accountability Office to receive briefs as to how the 
Department accounts for the population of persons who overstay 
their visas and how to make progress in providing for exit 
data.
    On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Visa Security and Overstays: How Secure is America?'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. John Wagner, Acting 
Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, 
Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. James Dinkins, Executive Associate Director, 
Homeland Security Investigations, Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Rebecca 
Gambler, Director of the Homeland Security and Justice, 
Government Accountability Office; and Mr. Shonnie Lyon, Acting 
Director, Office of Biometric Identity Management, National 
Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security. The purpose of this hearing was to examine 
the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to secure 
the border by addressing challenges in identifying individuals 
who overstay their visas.

                     THE FUTURE OF THE TWIC PROGRAM

    Implementation of the Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential (TWIC) continues to be plagued by challenges due to 
poor planning, technological hurdles, and lack of leadership by 
the Transportation Security Administration and the U.S. Coast 
Guard (USCG). Pilot programs that were designed to assist the 
USCG to issue the required regulatory rules to make the program 
operate as envisioned by the Congress have been less than 
successful. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has 
issued several reports on the shortfalls of the TWIC program 
and called into question the overall security value of the 
program stating, ``DHS has not demonstrated how, if at all, 
TWIC will improve maritime security.'' [GAO-13-198]. Millions 
of dollars of previously allocated and future grant spending 
are predicated on the TWIC providing a tangible security 
benefit at the Nation's ports and maritime facilities.
    Committee staff met with representatives from TSA, USCG and 
GAO to discuss the challenges facing the TWIC program and what 
the intent is for future deployment of technologies and 
improved customer service. On June 18, 2013, the Subcommittee 
held a hearing entitled ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: The 
Future of the TWIC Program.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from RADM Joseph A. Servidio, Assistant Commandant 
for Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Mr. Steve Sadler, Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Transportation Security 
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. 
Stephen M. Lord, Director, Forensic Audits and Investigative 
Services, U.S. Government Accountability Office; and Capt. 
Marcus Woodring, USCG (ret), Managing Director, Health, Safety, 
Security and Environmental, Port of Houston Authority. The 
purpose of this hearing was to reexamine the security value of 
the TWIC card and determine the future of the program.

                            BORDER SECURITY

    It is imperative that lessons learned from prior 
immigration reform efforts inform current proposals for 
immigration reform. The Senate's immigration bill, S. 744, 
emphasizes resources, with limited accountability or 
requirements to measure outcomes of those resources. The Senate 
bill spends an additional $46 billion dollars to: Double the 
size of the U.S. Border Patrol; build additional miles of 
fence; and purchase new technology.
    H.R. 1417, the Committee's border security legislation, 
calls for a strategy and an implementation plan to be produced 
prior to the expenditure of additional resources. It also 
requires metrics to increase accountability, and applies a 
standard of no less than 90 percent effectiveness to hold the 
Department accountable.
    Committee staff met with U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
Office of Field Operations, U.S. Border Patrol, U.S. Coast 
Guard, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the 
Government Accountability Office for briefings on the effect 
that various border security bills would have on their 
components.
    On June 23, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``A Study in Contrasts: House and Senate Approaches to Border 
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John 
Cornyn, Senator, State of Texas; Hon. Xavier Bercerra, a 
Representative in Congress from the 34th District, State of 
California; Mr. Jayson Ahern, Principal, Chertoff Group; Mr. 
Edward Alden, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow, Council on 
Foreign Relations; and Mr. Richard M. Stana, Former Director, 
Homeland Security and Justice, Government Accountability 
Office. The purpose of this hearing was to assess the two 
disparate border security approaches of the House and Senate, 
and to better inform the legislation that is presented to the 
Congress which seeks to achieve the outcome of a secure border.
    For further action on H.R. 1417, see discussion above.

                             BIOMETRIC EXIT

    Mandates for an electronic exit system designed to verify 
when aliens on a valid visa depart the United States have 
existed since 1996. While progress has been made on the 
collection of fingerprints and photographs of aliens entering 
the United States, the Department still does not collect 
biometric information from individuals exiting the country. 
Despite longstanding Congressional mandates, DHS has not 
implemented a biometric exit system. Instead the Department has 
focused on a less expensive ``biographic'' (matching names of 
airline manifests) option. As a result, DHS has more than one 
million ``unmatched'' records--records where the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection has entry, but no exit information on 
aliens who entered into the country on a valid visa. Estimates 
indicate that as many as 40 percent of all individuals 
unlawfully present in the U.S. enter the country on a valid 
visa and overstay their period of admittance. Any attempt to 
fully secure the border must also address the challenge of 
identifying and then removing visa overstays.
    Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations to 
receive briefings on the implementation of a biographic exit 
program at air, land, and sea ports of entry/exit.
    On September 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission Recommendation: 
Implementing Biometric Exit.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Mr. John Wagner, Acting Deputy Assistant 
Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, Customs and Border 
Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. John 
Woods, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and Ms. Rebecca Gambler, 
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office. The purpose of this hearing was to 
engage the Department of Homeland Security leadership on the 
current state of biometric exit and to chart a path forward to 
implement a system that is both a counterterrorism and border 
security tool.

                           MARITIME SECURITY

    As progress is made preventing illegal border crossings 
along the land borders of the United States, Transnational 
Criminal Organizations and have sought the path of least 
resistance and have been utilizing maritime means to enter the 
country. A serious threat to homeland security continues to be 
the movement of illegal drugs in bulk through the Transit Zone 
from South America through the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean. 
Trafficking organizations are using advanced methods of 
smuggling such as semi-submersibles and small vessels that are 
increasingly difficult to detect. In constrained fiscal 
environment, cooperative efforts to gain intelligence, 
situational awareness across the Department's maritime agencies 
is critical to securing the vast maritime borders of the 
Nation.
    Committee Staff met with representatives from the U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Office of Air and Marine, 
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), and the Government Accountability 
Office, to discuss the following topics related to maritime 
security: maritime domain awareness, threats in the maritime 
environment, USCG and CBP asset recapitalization, maritime 
strategy, and metrics.
    On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``What Does a Secure Maritime Border Look Like?'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from RADM William D. Lee, 
Deputy For Operations Policy and Capabilities, U.S. Coast 
Guard, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen L. 
Caldwell, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government 
Accountability Office; and Capt. Marcus Woodring, (Ret. USCG), 
Managing Director, Health, Safety, Security and Environmental, 
Port of Houston Authority. The purpose of this hearing was to 
examine: what DHS maritime components are doing to interdict 
maritime threats before they arrive on shore or in U.S. ports: 
what is being done to increase the Nation's understanding of 
illicit networks that move in the maritime domain: DHS' layered 
approach to secure the maritime environment; and how progress 
is being measured.

                              ----------                              


                       Subcommittee Hearings Held

``What Does a Secure Border Look Like?'' February 26, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-3)
``Measuring Outcomes to Understand the State of Border 
        Security.'' March 20, 2013. (Serial No. 113-8)
``Visa Security and Overstays: How Secure is America?'' May 21, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-18)
``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: The Future of the TWIC 
        Program.'' June 18, 2013. (Serial No. 113-23)
``A Study in Contrasts: House and Senate Approaches to Border 
        Security.'' July 23, 2013. (Serial No. 113-28)
``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission Recommendation: Implementing 
        Biometric Exit.'' September 26, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
        37)
``What Does a Secure Maritime Border Look Like?'' November 19, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-45)
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
                              Technologies

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies held eight hearings, receiving testimony 
from 34 witnesses, and considered two measures.

                              ----------                              


               Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee



  CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADVANCEMENT ACT OF 
                                  2013

                               H.R. 2952

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain 
improvements in the laws relating to the advancement of 
security technologies for critical infrastructure protection, 
and for other purposes.

Summary

    H.R. 2952 directs the Department of Homeland Security to 
facilitate the development of a Research and Development (R&D) 
strategy for critical infrastructure security technologies. 
This strategy will help our nation prioritize its investments 
in those aspects of the infrastructure that are most at risk. 
H.R. 2952 also directs the Secretary to explore the feasibility 
of expanding the use of public-private R&D consortiums to 
accelerate new security technologies and spur innovation and 
economic combativeness. In addition, CIRDA will designate a 
`Technology Clearinghouse' where proven security tools for 
protecting infrastructure can be rapidly shared amongst 
government and private partners.

Legislative History

    H.R. 2952 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2013, by 
Mr. Meehan, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. 
Within the Committee, H.R. 2952 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies.
    On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R. 
2952 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a 
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 2952 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.

        HOMELAND SECURITY CYBERSECURITY BOOTS-ON-THE-GROUND ACT

                               H.R. 3107

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish 
cybersecurity occupation classifications, assess the 
cybersecurity workforce, develop a strategy to address 
identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce, and for other 
purposes.

Summary

    H.R. 3107 directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to 
establish cybersecurity occupation classifications and to 
ensure that such classifications may be used throughout the 
Department and are made available to other federal agencies. 
H.R. 3107 also requires the Secretary to create a workforce 
strategy that enhances the readiness, capacity, training, 
recruitment, and retention of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) cybersecurity workforce, including a multiphased 
recruitment plan and a 10-year projection of federal workforce 
needs. This legislation would also create a process to verify 
that employees of independent contractors who serve in DHS 
cybersecurity positions receive initial and recurrent 
information security and role-based security training 
commensurate with assigned responsibilities.

Legislative History

    H.R. 3107 was introduced in the House on September 17, 
2013, by Ms. Clarke, and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 3107 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies.
    On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R. 
3107 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a 
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 3107 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 3107 to the House on December 
12, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-294.

                              ----------                              


                Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee


               CYBER THREATS FROM CHINA, RUSSIA, AND IRAN

    American critical infrastructure is under persistent cyber 
attack from criminals, activists, and nation states intent on 
compromising sensitive data or causing damage. One of the most 
consequential cyber threats is a concentrated attack by a 
nation state against key segments of American critical 
infrastructure. In late 2012 and early 2013 a series of cyber 
attacks, reportedly emanating from the Islamic Republic of 
Iran, targeted the American financial services sector and 
compromised the integrity and operation of several banks.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee and Committee staff traveled 
to New York, New York from February 7 through 8, 2013, to 
receive briefings from representatives of the financial 
services sector to examine the extent of the attacks and 
effective remediation strategies, including improved Federal 
cooperation.
    On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Cyber Threats from China, Russia and Iran: Protecting 
American Critical Infrastructure.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Mr. Frank J. Cilluffo, Director, Homeland 
Security Policy Institute and Co-Director, Cyber Center for 
National and Economic Security, The George Washington 
University; Mr. Richard Bejtlich, Chief Security Officer and 
Security Services Architect, Mandiant; Mr. Ilan Berman, Vice 
President, American Foreign Policy Council; and Mr. Martin C. 
Libicki, Senior Management Scientist, RAND Corporation. The 
purpose of this hearing was to examine the cybersecurity 
threats to American critical infrastructure from key nation 
states.

                 DHS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and 
Technology (S&T) Directorate is the primary research and 
development arm of the Department and manages science and 
technology research, from development through transition, for 
the Department's operational components and first responders to 
protect the homeland.
    On March 21, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee received 
a briefing from representative from the Department's Science 
and Technology Directorate. The purpose of this briefing was to 
examine S&T's efforts to develop and promulgate new 
technologies. As a result of this briefing, the Chair of the 
Subcommittee introduced H.R. 2952, the Critical Infrastructure 
Research and Development Advancement (CIRDA) Act of 2013, which 
requires DHS to develop a strategic research and development 
plan. See discussion of H.R. 2952, listed above.

                       CYBERSECURITY AND PRIVACY

    The Subcommittee's effort to improve the Department of 
Homeland Security's ability to oversee the cybersecurity of 
Federal networks and other critical infrastructures is driven 
by the paramount importance of protecting the integrity of 
sensitive data, including personally identifiable information 
(PII).
    On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Striking the Right Balance: Protecting Our Nation's Critical 
Infrastructure from Cyber Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil 
Liberties.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. Mary 
Ellen Callahan, Partner, Jenner & Block and Former Chief 
Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. 
Cheri F. McGuire, Vice President, Global Government Affairs & 
Cybersecurity Policy, Symantec; and Ms. Harriet Pearson, 
Partner, Hogan Lovells. The purpose of this hearing was to 
inform Members of the various privacy issues to be addressed in 
crafting cybersecurity policy and proposed legislation.
    On November 1, 2013, Subcommittee staff received a briefing 
from representatives of the National Cybersecurity & 
Communications Integration Center to examine the policies and 
procedures used by the Department to protect PII.
    Additionally, Committee staff held a series of meetings 
with privacy experts, advocates, and other stakeholders to 
inform oversight and craft legislative language to ensure the 
Department adequately protects private information.

                    CYBER THREAT INFORMATION SHARING

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the declared 
mission, and an FY 2013 budget of $896 million, to oversee the 
security of Federal civilian networks (the ``.gov'' domain) and 
aid private sector owners and operators of critical 
infrastructure in protecting their systems from cyber threats. 
The Subcommittee examined the existing cybersecurity 
information sharing and response capabilities at DHS used to 
fulfill these roles and evaluated the budget for the DHS Office 
of Cybersecurity and Communications (CS&C) to determine whether 
resources were being effectively utilized. The Subcommittee 
emphasized reviewing the authorities and activities of the CS&C 
National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center 
(NCCIC), which includes DHS information sharing and incident 
response units, in order to inform legislation currently in 
draft form.
    On May 16, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Facilitating Cyber Threat Information Sharing and Partnering 
with the Private Sector to Protect Critical Infrastructure: An 
Assessment of DHS Capabilities.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Ms. Roberta Stempfley, Acting Assistant 
Secretary, Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Larry Zelvin, Director, 
National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and Mr. Charles K. 
Edwards, Acting Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security. The purpose of this hearing was to inform Members of 
the cybersecurity authorities, capabilities and limitations at 
DHS.
    On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, 
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and 
Communications held a joint classified Member tour and briefing 
at the Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity 
and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC). This briefing 
provided Members an opportunity to assess the capabilities and 
impediments of operations at the NCCIC in order to inform 
authorizing legislation.

                        CYBER INCIDENT RESPONSE

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offers technical 
assistance to owners and operators of critical infrastructure, 
including State and local governments, on a voluntary basis in 
the event of cyber incidents. The Subcommittee in concerned 
about the adequacy and effectiveness of DHS's efforts, 
including education and outreach efforts to State and local 
emergency planners.
    On October 30, 2013, the Subcommittee on Emergency 
Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the Subcommittee 
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
Technologies held a joint hearing entitled ``Cyber Incident 
Response: Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. 
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary, 
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National Protection 
and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 
Mr. Charley English, Director, Georgia Emergency Management 
Agency, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency 
Management Association; Mr. Craig Orgeron, Chief Information 
Officer and Executive Director, Department of Information 
Technology Services, State of Mississippi, testifying on behalf 
of the National Association of State Chief Information 
Officers; Mr. Mike Sena, Deputy Director, Northern California 
Regional Intelligence Center, testifying on behalf of the 
National Fusion Center Association; and Mr. Paul Molitor, 
Assistant Vice President, National Electrical Manufacturers 
Association. This hearing examined the extent of cyber threat 
information sharing and response capabilities to a cyber 
incident with physical consequences. The purpose of the hearing 
was to examine ways to improve the ability of DHS to aid state 
and local emergency responders in the event of a significant 
cyber incident.
    In preparation for this hearing, Committee staff met with 
stakeholders to discuss information sharing related to cyber 
threats and cyber incident response capabilities. On September 
18, 2013, Committee staff also received a briefing from 
representatives from DHS's Office of Cybersecurity and 
Communications on the Department's efforts to share cyber 
threat information with emergency response providers.

                    PRIVACY CONCERNS WITH OBAMACARE

    The implementation of systems associated with the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare), 
including healthcare.gov, the Federal Health Insurance Exchange 
(HIX) and the Federal Data Services Hub, raised concerns that 
these systems do not properly secure sensitive personal data.
    On July 17, 2013, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, 
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the 
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's Subcommittee on 
Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements held a joint 
hearing entitled ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, and Fraud 
Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing Apparatus.'' The 
Subcommittees received testimony from Mr. Alan R. Duncan, 
Assistant Inspector General for Security and Information 
Technology Services, Inspector General for Tax Administration, 
Department of the Treasury; Mr. Terence V. Milholland, Chief 
Technology Officer, Internal Revenue Service; Hon. Danny 
Werfel, Principal Deputy Commissioner, Internal Revenue 
Service; Hon. Marilyn B. Tavenner, Administrator, Centers for 
Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and 
Human Services; Mr. Henry Chao, Deputy Chief Information 
Officer, Deputy Director of the Office of Information Services, 
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of 
Health and Human Services; and Mr. John Dicken, Director, 
Health Care, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
    On September 11, 2013, the Subcommittee continued to 
examine the issue of the security of personal information 
through a hearing entitled ``The Threat to Americans' Personal 
Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability of the 
Health Exchange Data Hub.'' The Subcommittee received testimony 
from Mr. Michael Astrue, Former Social Security Commissioner, 
Former U.S. Department of Health and Human Services General 
Counsel; Stephen T. Parente, Ph.D., Minnesota Insurance 
Industry Chair of Health Finance, Director, Medical Industry 
Leadership Institute and Professor, Department of Finance, 
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota; Ms. Kay 
Daly, Assistant Inspector General, Audit Services, U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services; and Mr. Matt Salo, 
Executive Director, National Association of Medicaid Directors.
    In preparation for these hearings, Subcommittee staff met 
with stakeholders to examine what measures were being taken by 
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to protect 
personal identifiable information and whether those measures 
were adequate. Despite assures from CMS, the Subcommittee 
continues to be concerned that adequate security measures and 
certifications have yet to be implemented.

                         EXECUTIVE ORDER 13636

    Executive Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure 
Cybersecurity, has directed the National Institutes for 
Standards and Technology (NIST) to work with stakeholders to 
develop a voluntary framework for reducing cyber risks to 
critical infrastructure.
    On July 18, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Oversight of Executive Order 13636 and Development of the 
Cybersecurity Framework.'' The Subcommittee received testimony 
from Mr. Robert Kolasky, Director, Implementation Task Force, 
National Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department 
of Homeland Security; Charles H. Romine, PhD, Director, 
Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce; and Eric 
A. Fischer, PhD, Senior Specialist, Science and Technology, 
Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
    From July 10 through 12, 2013, Committee staff attended the 
third Cybersecurity Framework workshop in San Diego, California 
hosted by the University of California, San Diego and the 
National Health Information Sharing and Analysis Center (NH-
ISAC). At this workshop, NIST presented an annotated outline of 
the initial draft Cybersecurity Framework for discussion.
    From September 11 through 13, 2013, Committee staff 
attended the fifth Cybersecurity Framework workshop in 
Richardson, Texas hosted by the University of Texas at Dallas. 
At this workshop, NIST presented the draft Preliminary 
Cybersecurity Framework for discussion. The purpose of 
attending the workshops was to participate in the development 
of the framework and meet with other stakeholders to inform 
continuing oversight of the development of the EO framework.
    In preparation for the hearing and workshops, Subcommittee 
Members and staff held a series of meetings with stakeholders 
participating in the development of the framework.

               CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STANDARDS

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the statutory 
authority, which currently expires on January 15, 2014, to 
regulate chemical facilities for security purposes. While the 
Subcommittee supports reauthorizing Chemical Facility Anti-
Terrorism Standards (CFATS), a number of concerns exposed by 
Congress and reports from both the DHS Office of the Inspector 
General (OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 
must be addressed. Concerns include the adequacy and 
effectiveness of DHS efforts including program management.
    The explosion on April 17, 2013, at the West Fertilizer 
Company fertilizer distribution facility in West, Texas, led to 
additional focus on DHS's ability to identify noncompliant 
facilities as the company had not reported to DHS under the 
CFATS program even though it appeared to have possessed more 
than threshold quantities of chemicals of interest. DHS had no 
knowledge of the facility's existence.
    On August 1, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: The Problem of Unidentified 
Chemical Facilities.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from 
Mr. David Wulf, ISCD Director, National Protection and Programs 
Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen 
L. Caldwell, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, U.S. 
Government Accountability Office; Mr. Donnie Dippel, President, 
Texas Ag Industries Association; Mr. Paul Derig, Environmental 
Health and Safety Manger III, J.R. Simplot Company, testifying 
on behalf of the Agricultural Retailers Association; Mr. 
Timothy J. Scott, Chief Security Officer, Corporate Director, 
Emergency Services and Security, The Dow Chemical Company; and 
Mr. Sean Moulton, Director, Open Government Policy, Center for 
Effective Government. The purpose of this hearing was to 
examine DHS efforts to improve their ability to identify other 
``outlier'' facilities not currently identified.
    Subcommittee staff received two bicameral, multi-Committee 
briefings from DHS, Infrastructure Security Compliance 
Division. In addition, Subcommittee staff held a series of 
meetings with stakeholders to inform efforts to draft 
reauthorization legislation.

                                 DOMINO

    The DHS National Protection and Programs Directorate, 
Network Security Deployment Branch is currently in the process 
of developing an approximately $920 million Request for 
Proposal (RFP) for the Development, Operations and Maintenance 
(DOMino) Federal Enterprise Network Security Program. The 
Subcommittee has concerns regarding the size, scope, 
effectiveness and cost of the program. On August 6, 2013, 
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of the 
Department of Homeland Security on this acquisition to update 
timeline for the release of the RFP.

           CONTINUOUS DIAGNOSTIC AND MITIGATION (CDM) PROGRAM

    The Subcommittee examined the progress of the Government-
wide adoption of the $6 billion the Continuous Diagnostic and 
Mitigation Program, which will consolidate Federal 
cybersecurity practices under one set of requirements. On 
October 30, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from 
representatives of the Department of Homeland Security on the 
CDM program to ascertain contract awards and timelines for 
deployment.

                   DOMESTIC NUCLEAR DETECTION OFFICE

    The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) has the 
mandate to develop technologies to detect radiological threats 
within the United States. On March 14, 2013, Members of the 
Subcommittee received a briefing from representatives from the 
DNDO to investigate the adequacy of the office's $200 million 
and the effectiveness of technologies under development.

                              ----------                              


                       Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Cyber Threats from China, Russia and Iran: Protecting 
        American Critical Infrastructure.'' March 20, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-9)
``Striking the Right Balance: Protecting Our Nation's Critical 
        Infrastructure from Cyber Attack and Ensuring Privacy 
        and Civil Liberties.'' April 25, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
        13)
``Facilitating Cyber Threat Information Sharing and Partnering 
        with the Private Sector to Protect Critical 
        Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS Capabilities.'' 
        May 16, 2013. (Serial No. 113-17)
``Evaluating Privacy, Security, and Fraud Concerns with 
        ObamaCare's Information Sharing Apparatus.'' Joint 
        hearing with the Committee on Oversight and Government 
        Reform, Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
        Entitlements. July 17, 2013. (Serial No. 113-25)
``Oversight of Executive Order 13636 and Development of the 
        Cybersecurity Framework.'' July 18, 213. (Serial No. 
        113-27)
``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: The Problem of Unidentified 
        Chemical Facilities.'' August 1, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
        30)
``The Threat to Americans' Personal Information: A Look into 
        the Security and Reliability of the Health Exchange 
        Data Hub.'' September 11, 2013. (Serial No. 113-33)
``Cyber Incident Response: Bridging the Gap Between 
        Cybersecurity and Emergency Management.''Joint hearing 
        with the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, 
        Response, and Communications. October 30, 2013. (Serial 
        No. 113-39)
          Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency held 10 
hearings, receiving testimony from 40 witnesses.

                              ----------                              


                Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee


                             PRIVACY ISSUES

    The protection of the privacy of American citizens is 
critically important especially when implementing programs and 
policies to secure the Nation. Specifically, ensuring that the 
Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) information gathering 
and analysis functions and other programs across its components 
adhere to established standards is a critical responsibility of 
DHS through its Chief Privacy Officer. On February 6, 2013, 
Members of the Subcommittee received a classified briefing on 
privacy issues and the role of the Department and the National 
Counterterrorism Center in collecting, analyzing, and storing 
intelligence on U.S. persons. The Members learned how the 
Center is implementing its new ``Guidelines for Access, 
Retention, Use, and Dissemination of U.S. Persons 
Information.''
    On June 19, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from 
officials from the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties 
on civil liberties concerns at border checkpoints.

                              DHS SPENDING

    The terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, forced the 
United States to fundamentally rethink the threats it faces and 
its approach to defending the Nation. Today, the Department of 
Homeland Security (DHS) has a budget of almost $60 billion, 
employs more than 225,000 people, operates in more than 75 
countries, and is the third largest Federal agency. At a time 
when the Nation stands at over $17 trillion in debt, a rigorous 
assessment is needed to review how the Department spends 
taxpayer dollars. On February 15, 2013, the Subcommittee held a 
hearing entitled ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How Wisely is 
DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Hon. James Gilmore, III, President Free Congress 
Foundation; Mr. Shawn Reese, Analyst, Emergency Management and 
Homeland Security Policy, Congressional Research Service, 
Library of Congress; Mr. Rick ``Ozzie'' Nelson, Vice President 
for Business Development, Cross Match Technologies; Ms. 
Cathleen Berrick, Managing Director, Homeland Security and 
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office. The purpose 
of the hearing was to address the Department's progress and 
shortcomings in implementing its various missions 10 years 
after its creation, integrating its components, and diligence 
in making sure taxpayer dollars are being spent efficiently.
    In addition, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter on 
February 28, 2013, to the Undersecretary for Management on the 
Department's conference spending. The letter noted concerns 
over DHS's conference spending and previous data provided to 
the Committee. The Department provided a response on May 28, 
2013. Additionally, on November 6, 2013, the Chair of the 
Subcommittee requested the Comptroller General of the U.S. 
review DHS's management of fee based programs.
    In light of egregious waste related to Internal Revenue 
Service training videos uncovered by the Inspector General of 
the Department of the Treasury, the Chair of the Subcommittee 
sent a letter on June 6, 2013, to the Undersecretary for 
Management, requesting that the Department provide the cost and 
types of internal training materials, especially videos, 
created by DHS and its components. To date, the Department has 
not provided a response.

                 TSA'S PASSENGER SCREENING TECHNOLOGIES

    After the 2009 Christmas Day Northwest Flight 253 bombing 
attempt, deployment of the Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) 
machines at airports Nation-wide accelerated, resulting in a 
total of 841 such machines being deployed to 208 airports. 
These machines were deployed to enhance TSA's capability to 
identify non-metallic and liquid explosives, akin to the bomb 
used in the Flight 253 bombing attempt. Due to privacy 
concerns, in January 2012, Congress mandated in the FAA 
Modernization Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95) that all advanced 
imaging technology be equipped with Automated Target 
Recognition. Because of this, all backscatter AIT units, which 
were unable to meet the new mandate, were removed from airports 
at the vendor's expense.
    In an effort to review the TSA's Passenger Screening 
Technologies, on February 5, 2013, the Members of the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security and the Subcommittee on 
Oversight and Management Efficiency received a joint classified 
briefing. The Subcommittees were briefed by representatives 
from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the 
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General 
(OIG). The briefing addressed the development of the 
technology, challenges with the acquisition process, among 
other issues. Subsequent to the briefing, the OIG released a 
report on TSA's deployment and use of AIT machines [OIG-13-
120]. The OIG Report found that TSA did not develop a 
comprehensive deployment strategy to ensure all AIT units were 
effectively deployed and fully used for screening passengers 
due to the agency failing to have a policy or process requiring 
program offices to prepare strategic deployment plans for new 
technology that align with the overall goals of its Passenger 
Screening Program and lacking adequate internal controls to 
ensure accurate data on Advanced Imaging Technology 
utilization.
    As a result of the briefing, the Chair of the Subcommittee 
sent a letter to the Administrator of TSA. The TSA provided the 
Subcommittee with a response on March 15, 2013. The 
Subcommittee Chair also signed onto ongoing GAO work evaluating 
TSA's AIT program. The Subcommittee intends to further review 
and monitor TSA's Passenger Screening Technologies in 
conjunction with the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.

            DHS HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION AT ST. ELIZABETHS

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stands as the 
third largest department in the Federal Government, with its 
components scattered at over 50 locations throughout the 
National Capital Region. In an effort to consolidate locations 
and increase a unified organization, construction is currently 
underway for a new headquarters facility. The construction of 
the Department's Headquarters at the St. Elizabeths campus, in 
Washington, D.C. is the largest Federal construction project to 
occur in the National Capital Region since the construction of 
The Pentagon. To date, over $1 billion has been appropriated 
for this project.
    On March 1, 2013, officials from the Department briefed 
Committee staff on construction efforts at the St. Elizabeths 
facility and discussed budget requests. On March 15, 2013, the 
Members of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit to the 
Department of Homeland Security Consolidated Headquarters at 
St. Elizabeths. While on campus, Members toured the facility 
and were briefed by the Department on construction progress and 
the status of consolidation efforts. As a follow up to this 
site visit, on March 20, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee 
requested the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a 
comprehensive review of the consolidation project. GAO 
acknowledged receipt of this request. On May 30, 2013, 
Committee staff were briefed by officials from the General 
Services Administration (GSA) on the St. Elizabeths 
consolidated headquarters effort. Committee staff received 
separate briefings related to GSA contracts awarded for this 
project. On July 29, 2013, Committee staff attended the ribbon 
cutting ceremony on the St. Elizabeth's campus for the United 
States Coast Guard Headquarters. The Subcommittee will continue 
to closely monitor this major project.

                      UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE

    The Subcommittee examined the homeland security operations 
of the United States Secret Service (USSS), including its 
critical role of protecting the President of the United States, 
particularly during the Presidential inauguration, and other 
duties. The Committee is also monitoring the upgrading and 
modernizing of USSS information technology (IT) capabilities, 
and issues related to employee integrity and morale. On January 
18, 2013, the Committee staff traveled to the U.S. Secret 
Service, James J. Rowley Training Center in Beltsville, 
Maryland to receive a briefing on preparations for the 2013 
Presidential inauguration. Committee Staff visited the Multi-
Agency Communications Center and received a briefing on the 
planning and logistical details of the inauguration from 
cognizant Secret Service officials.
    On April 17, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee received a 
briefing with the Secret Service Director to discuss: The 
Director's goals and priorities; budget issues; the Cartagena, 
Columbia, employee misconduct investigation; among other 
topics.
    Committee staff received a briefing from Secret Service 
officials on June 27, 2013 on the agency's information 
technology modernization efforts. On August 8, 2013, Committee 
staff also received a briefing on the next generation 
Presidential limousine program and conducted a site visit at 
the Secret Service mail screening facility in Washington D.C. 
On November 12, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee conducted 
a site visit to the Secret Service training facility in 
Beltsville, Maryland. Members toured the facility and were 
briefed by Secret Service officials on their training programs.

                       DHS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

    The Subcommittee reviewed the Department of Homeland 
Security's (DHS) overall efforts to address information 
technology (IT) challenges, including the management and 
integration of the Department's IT systems. The Committee 
reviewed the authorities and activities of the Chief 
Information Officer (CIO) to ensure the effective management 
and coordination of key IT systems planning, investment 
management, cloud computing, data consolidating, operations, 
policy development, and related personnel management. The 
Subcommittee also examined component CIOs--particularly Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement (ICE), and United States Customs and Immigration 
Services (USCIS)--and their efforts to modernize and implement 
critical IT systems supporting our border agents and 
immigration officers. On February 21, 2013, Committee staff 
received a briefing from DHS Office of Inspector General 
concerning their ongoing IT Audits and IT management issues. 
From March 13 through 15, 2013, in preparation for the March 
19, 2013 hearing, Committee staff received briefings from 
representatives from DHS, including: The DHS Chief Information 
Officer; USCIS, including the USCIS Chief Information Officer; 
CBP; and ICE, including the ICE Chief Information Officer. On 
August 22, 2013, Committee staff were briefed by the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on its 
transportation infrastructure modernization efforts, which 
seeks to update TSA IT infrastructure in maritime, surface, and 
aviation environments.
    On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS Harnessed 
IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration Laws?'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. Margaret H. Graves, 
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. David Powner, Director, Information Technology 
Management Issues, Government Accountability Office; and Mr. 
Charles K. Edwards, Deputy Inspector General, Department of 
Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was to assess how 
IT resources are being effectively utilized to help secure our 
borders and uphold immigration laws and how the Department is 
exercising proper management and oversight of its IT 
investments.
    As a follow up to this hearing, the Chair and Ranking 
Member of the Subcommittee requested on March 21, 2013, that 
the Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine the 
Department's tactical communication acquisition programs. The 
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee additionally 
requested on May 23, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing GAO review 
of the TECS modernization program--the Treasury Enforcement 
Communication System. Committee staff also received a briefing 
from the Office of Inspector General regarding its 
investigation related to the DHS Chief Information Officer.

                        DHS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

    The Subcommittee conducted oversight of the Department of 
Homeland Security's (DHS) progress to properly manage financial 
systems and data to minimize inefficient and wasteful spending, 
make more informed decisions to manage its programs and 
implement Department policies. The Subcommittee also reviewed 
the Department's efforts to enhance its managerial cost 
accounting, address internal control weaknesses in financial 
reporting, achieve a clean audit opinion on its financial 
statements, and reduce the reliance on manual data calls to 
collect cost information from the various components and 
compile consolidated, reliable data. In light of the Government 
Accountability Office's (GAO) 2013 High-Risk report which 
identified financial management within the Department as high 
risk, on February 20, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee 
and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency, 
and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure 
Protection, and Security Technologies, sent a letter to DHS's 
Chief Financial Officer regarding the Department's financial 
management systems and efforts to obtain a clean audit opinion 
on its financial statements. The Department provided a response 
to this letter on March 8, 2013. On March 11, 2013, Committee 
staff received a briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer. 
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller 
General on June 6, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing review of DHS 
financial management efforts being performed at the request of 
the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 
Committee. GAO issued its report DHS Financial Management: 
Additional Efforts Needed to Resolve Deficiencies in Internal 
Controls and Financial Management Systems on September 30, 
2013, [GAO-13-561]. The report contained four recommendations 
for executive action. On July 8, 2013, Committee staff received 
a briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer regarding DHS's 
efforts to modernize its financial systems.
    To further examine these issues, on November 15, 2013, the 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``DHS Financial 
Management: Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer 
Dollars.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Asif 
Khan, Director, Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. 
Government Accountability Office; and Ms. Anne Richards, 
Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of Inspector 
General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of 
the hearing was to examine relevant GAO and Inspector General 
findings on DHS financial practices, including steps to obtain 
a clean audit opinion and implement financial management 
systems.

                       FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE

    The Subcommittee is concerned with, and is monitoring, the 
safety and security of Federal buildings and facilities, 
including: The lead role and effectiveness of the Federal 
Protective Service (FPS); its implementation of a risk-
assessment Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool; its 
collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 
Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate; its use of and 
documenting of qualifications for contracting officers; and 
other issues related to its best practices in management and 
conducting effective risk assessment reviews. As part of 
ongoing FPS oversight, the Committee requested that the 
Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine the sources that 
inform how Federal agencies conduct their physical security 
programs, and the management practices that agencies use to 
oversee physical security activities and allocation physical 
security resources. In response to this request, on January 24, 
2013, GAO issued its report entitled Facility Security: Greater 
Outreach by DHS on Standards and Management Practices Could 
Benefit Federal Agencies [GAO-13-122]. The report contained two 
recommendation. The GAO also released a supplement to the 
report [GAO-13-22SP], which presented the results of GAO's web-
based survey of Executive Branch agencies about how they 
approach the physical security of facilities that FPS is not 
responsible for protecting. The Chair of the Subcommittee 
signed onto ongoing work by the Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) examining FPS contract guard management, Federal 
facility risk assessment process, and Federal facility 
evacuation preparedness. The GAO issued its report on FPS 
contract guard management on September 17, 2013, Federal 
Protective Service Challenges with Oversight of Contract Guard 
Program Still Exist, and Additional Management Controls are 
Needed, [GAO-13-694]. The report contained three 
recommendations for executive action. The GAO issued its report 
on Federal facility evacuation preparedness on October 25, 
2013, Federal Facilities: Selected Facilities Emergency Plans 
Generally Reflect Federal Guidance, [GAO-14-101].
    On February 13, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from the GAO concerning their ongoing work related to the FPS. 
On March 4, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from the 
Federal Protective Services Union. On March 20, 2013, 
Subcommittee Majority Staff received a briefing from FPS, DHS 
Deputy Director for Policy and Planning, and Deputy Director 
for Operations at the Federal Protective Service. On April 4, 
2013, Committee staff visited FPS headquarters to receive a 
briefing on FPS's risk assessment process and toured security 
operations at a local federal Facility. On May 23, 2013, the 
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight 
and Management Efficiency, and the Subcommittee on 
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
Technologies Subcommittee, requested the GAO to review physical 
and information security efforts at Federal facilities. On June 
12, 2013, Chairs and Ranking Members of the Full Committee and 
the Subcommittee, requested the Comptroller General of the 
United States review the coordination and sharing of Federal 
facility security and threat information. On July 18, 2013, 
Committee staff visited FPS operations at its C St. Facility in 
Washington D.C. to learn more about how FPS protects Federal 
buildings. Committee staff received a separate briefing from 
FPS officials related to its activities based cost modeling 
efforts.
    In light of the tragic shooting at the Washington Naval 
Yard on September 16, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing on 
October 30, 2013, entitled ``Facility Protection: Implications 
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. L. Eric Patterson, 
Director, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Mr. Greg Marshall, Chief Security Officer, 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Caitlin Durkovich, 
Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Protection, U.S. Department 
of Homeland Security, testifying on behalf of the Interagency 
Security Committee; and Mr. Mark Goldstein, Director, Physical 
Infrastructure Issues, U.S. Government Accountability Office. 
The purpose of the hearing was to examine the state of physical 
security at Federal facilities and identify opportunities to 
prevent similar tragedies in the future.

                             SEQUESTRATION

    In March 2013, sequestration took effect resulting in a 
series of automatic, across the board spending cuts. The 
Department provided conflicting public statements on the 
impacts of these cuts. Initial plans to furlough Department 
employees were later avoided yet public statements from the 
Department on compromised border security and impassible 
airport screening lines caused undue alarm among the American 
people. As a result of these concerns, on April 12, 2013, the 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``The Impact of 
Sequestration on Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible 
Threat?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael 
Borras, Under Secretary for Management, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Mr. Thomas S. Winkowski, Deputy 
Commissioner, Performing the duties of the Commissioner, 
Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. John Halinski, Deputy Administrator, 
Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Mr. Daniel H. Ragsdale, Deputy Director, 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; and Mr. Brandon Judd, President, National 
Border Patrol Council. The purpose of this hearing was to 
examine the Department's preparations for sequestration and its 
conclusions on the possible impacts to homeland security.

                   DUPLICATION AND WASTEFUL SPENDING

    The Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the 
Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 
have issued numerous reports identifying duplication and waste 
within DHS. Private sector best management practices also offer 
opportunities for DHS to improve operations. With the National 
debt at about $17 trillion, rigorous oversight to identify and 
eliminate duplicative and wasteful programs is essential. As a 
result, on April 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Cutting DHS Duplication and Wasteful Spending: 
Implementing Private Sector Best Practices and Watchdog 
Recommendations.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. 
Cathleen Berrick, Managing Director, Homeland Security and 
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office; Ms. Anne L. 
Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of 
Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Paul 
G. Stern, Ph.D., Board Director, Business Executives for 
National Security; Mr. Craig Killough, Vice President, 
Organization Markets, Project Management Institute; and Henry 
H. Willis, Ph.D., Director, RAND Homeland Security and Defense 
Center. The purpose of this hearing was to assess the findings 
of the GAO and the Inspector General related to duplication and 
waste within the Department and examine best practices 
identified by the private sector to improve DHS's efficiency 
and effectiveness. As a follow up to this hearing, the Chair of 
the Subcommittee sent a letter on May 17, 2013, to the 
Secretary of Homeland Security summarizing the hearing's 
findings and requesting additional information on steps the 
Department has taken to improve the efficiency and 
effectiveness of its programs. The Department provided a 
response on December 15, 2013.
    Committee staff also received a briefing on March 26, 2013, 
from Department officials on DHS's ``See Something, Say 
Something'' campaign to examine the campaign's effectiveness 
and ensure taxpayer dollars are spent wisely.
    On September 23, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from GAO officials on the Department's progress in addressing 
GAO's High-Risk List area of ``Strengthening Department of 
Homeland Security Management Functions.'' The area includes 
issues related to DHS acquisition management, financial 
management, information technology management, human capital 
management, and management integration. The GAO's High-Risk 
List includes areas at high risk due to vulnerabilities to 
fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. The GAO has included 
DHS management functions in its Hight-Risk List since 2003.

                          DHS WORKFORCE MORALE

    Rigorous oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's 
(DHS) efforts to improve workforce morale has been conducted 
since the Department continues to perform poorly in the Office 
of Personnel Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the 
Department's own personnel surveys. As a result, the Chair of 
the Subcommittee signed onto ongoing Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) work assessing the Department's recruitment and 
hiring strategies. The GAO issued its report on September 17, 
2013, DHS Recruiting and Hiring: DHS Is Generally Filling 
Mission-Critical Positions, but Could Better Track Costs of 
Coordinated Recruiting Efforts, [GAO-13-742]. The report 
included one recommendation for executive action. On May 7, 
2013, Committee staff were briefed by the Chief Human Capital 
Officer on the Employee Engagement Executive Steering Committee 
and Department leadership training to address the morale issues 
at the Department.
    On September 11, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from officials of the Institute of Medicine of the National 
Academies. On September 12, 2013, the Institute of Medicine 
released a report titled A Ready and Resilient Workforce for 
the Department of Homeland Security: Protecting America's Front 
Line. The report contained seven recommendations to improve the 
readiness and resilience (the ability to withstand, recover, 
and grow in the face of stressors and changing demands) of DHS.

                           EMPLOYEE INTEGRITY

    Strong employee integrity within the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) is essential to homeland security. Although the 
vast majority of Department employees reflect the Department's 
core values, even one corrupt employee represents a management 
challenge. As a result, the Chair of the Subcommittee signed on 
to GAO work evaluating employee misconduct issues at the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA). On July 30, 2013, 
GAO issued its report entitled ``Transportation Security: TSA 
Could Strengthen Monitoring of Allegations of Employee 
Misconduct'' [GAO-13-624]. The report contained four 
recommendations for executive action.
    To examine these findings, the Subcommittee on Oversight 
and Management Efficiency and the Subcommittee on 
Transportation Security held a joint hearing on July 31, 2013, 
entitled ``TSA Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by 
Airport Security Personnel.'' The Subcommittees received 
testimony from Mr. John Halinski, Deputy Administrator, 
Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen M. Lord, Director, Forensic 
Audits and Investigative Services, Government Accountability 
Office; and Ms. Deborah Outten-Mills, Acting Assistant 
Inspector General for Inspections, Office of Inspector General, 
U.S. Department of Homeland. The purpose of the hearing was to 
examine the scope of misconduct within TSA and determine to 
what extent the Administration is taking action to address 
employee integrity issues. On August 19, 2013, the Chair of the 
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland 
Security requesting an update on the Department's mandated 
report on investigating corruption in DHS. The Department 
provided a response on December 5, 2013.

                   FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OVERSIGHT

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the largest 
law enforcement agency in the Federal Government. According to 
the 2008 Census of Federal Law Enforcement Officers, DHS had 
more than 45 percent of all Federal law enforcement officers 
with arrest and firearms authority--with the number of officers 
totaling approximately 60,000. On May 23, 2013, Member of the 
Subcommittee conducted a site visit to the Federal Law 
Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Cheltenham, Maryland. 
The site visit provided Members the opportunity to tour the 
facility and receive briefings on FLETC operations. As a follow 
up to this visit, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter 
to the Director of FLETC on June 14, 2013, related to FLETC 
training, the letter specifically requested information on the 
types of training FLETC provided to agencies outside DHS. FLETC 
provided a response to the Subcommittee on July 22, 2013. In 
addition, the Chair of the Subcommittee met with the Director 
of FLETC on June 19, 2013, to obtain an overview of FLETC's 
operations. On July 26, 2013, Committee staff received a 
briefing from FLETC officials regarding training provided to 
the Department of State.
    In response to concerns regarding the Federal Flight Deck 
Officer program, the Chairs of the Subcommittee on Oversight 
and Management Efficiency and the Subcommittee on 
Transportation Security, sent a letter to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security on June 6, 2013, requesting obtain 
information on the future of the program, including to what 
extent the Department plans to use FLETC to continue this 
essential training for pilots. A response was provided to the 
Subcommittees on July 29, 2013.
    Media reports of ammunition and weapons acquisitions by DHS 
spurred public interest and led to wide-ranging questions 
regarding the amounts of ammunition purchased by the 
Department. As a result, the Chairs of the Full Committee and 
the Subcommittee requested GAO to examine the Department's 
ammunition and weapons procurements.

                           DHS COMMUNICATIONS

    Effective communication is critical to implementing the 
Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) mission of defending 
the Nation. However, numerous recent incidents indicated the 
Department was unresponsive to certain concerns from the 
American people. A sound communication strategy is important to 
help DHS's credibility, implement policy, respond to natural 
disasters, and protect the homeland. On June 14, 2013, the 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Why Can't DHS Better 
Communicate with the American People?'' The Subcommittee 
received testimony from Mr. Robert Jensen, Principal Deputy 
Assistant Secretary, Office of Public AffairsU.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Ms. Tamara Kessler, Acting Officer for Civil 
Rights and Civil Liberties, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. Bill Braniff, Executive Director, National 
Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to 
Terrorism, University of Maryland; and Mr. Doug Pinkham, 
President, Public Affairs Council. The purpose of this hearing 
was to assess the Department's strategy for communicating on 
issues of importance and concern to the general public and key 
stakeholders.
    With continued concerns over the Department's transparency 
with the American people, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a 
letter to DHS's Acting Chief Privacy Officer on June 13, 2013, 
requesting information on how the Department manages requests 
submitted under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The 
Department provided a response on July 22, 2013. Due to the 
importance of this issue, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a 
letter to the Comptroller General of the United States on 
August 6, 2013, requesting a comprehensive review of DHS's 
management of FOIA.
    On June 21, 2013, Committee staff were briefed by Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Policy for Strategy, Planning, 
Analysis, and Risk regarding the Department's strategic 
planning efforts as part of the Quadrennial Homeland Security 
Review. Officials from the Department responded to questions 
regarding to what extent the Department is seeking input from 
the public, industry, and other groups regarding the strategy, 
among other things. As a follow up, on November 15, 2013, the 
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittees sent a 
letter to the Acting Secretary to ensure the review addresses 
critical homeland security issues and relevant recommendations.

                     IRAN IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

    The Intelligence Community and the Department of Defense 
has previously raised significant concerns regarding the 
Islamic Republic of Iran's presence in Latin America and the 
threat this presence poses to National security. A June 2013 
State Department report responding to the Countering Iran in 
the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-220) conflicted 
these findings by stating that the Iranian presence in the 
hemisphere is ``waning.'' To examine these important issues, on 
July 9, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Threat 
to the Homeland: Iran's Extending Influence in the Western 
Hemisphere.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Ilan 
Berman, Vice President, American Foreign Policy Council; Mr. 
Joseph M. Humire, Executive Director, Center for a Secure Free 
Society; Mr. Blaise Misztal, Acting Director of Foreign Policy, 
Bipartisan Policy Center; Mr. Douglas Farah, President, IBI 
Consultants. The purpose of the hearing was to examine these 
findings and assess the threat to U.S. homeland security from 
Iran's presence in the Western Hemisphere.
    Additionally, the Chair of Full Committee and the Chair of 
the Subcommittee requested the Government Accountability Office 
(GAO) examine the extent to which the Department of Homeland 
Security conducts covert testing to determine weaknesses in 
border security. In February 2013, the Chair of the 
Subcommittee sent a letter to GAO to sign onto on-going work 
being conducted for the Chair of the Full Committee related to 
Iran's presence in Latin America and DHS's international 
counterterrorism activities. The GAO issued its report on DHS's 
international counterterrorism activities on September 25, 
2013, Combating Terrorism: DHS Should Take Action to Better 
Ensure Resources Abroad Align with Priorities, [GAO-13-681]. It 
contained three recommendations for executive action.

                       DHS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) invests 
extensively in major acquisition programs to develop new 
systems that help the Department execute its many critical 
missions. The Department is acquiring systems to help secure 
the border, facilitate trade, screen travelers, enhance cyber 
security, and improve disaster response, among other things. 
Oversight and accountability of these important acquisition 
programs is critical to ensure taxpayer dollars are not wasted. 
In February 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee requested to 
sign onto on-going Government Accountability (GAO) work related 
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) acquisition of 
border surveillance technology and DHS's multiyear acquisition 
planning process. On March 21, 2013, the Chair and Ranking 
Member of the Subcommittee requested GAO conduct a review of 
the tactical communication acquisition programs underway in 
DHS.
    The Assistant Commissioner for Customs and Border 
Protection briefed Committee staff on July 15, 2013, on the 
status of several acquisition programs related to border 
security. On August 1, 2013, the Undersecretary for Management, 
the Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Information Officer, and 
other senior officials briefed Committee staff on the status of 
the Department's acquisition management efforts. As a follow 
up, on November 5, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and 
the Subcommittee raised concerns, in a letter to the Chief 
Procurement Officer, over the Department's Enterprise 
Acquisition Gateway for Leading Edge Solutions II (EAGLE II) 
and requested additional information. The Department provided a 
written response on December 2, 2013.
    To more closely examine challenges related to DHS 
acquisition management, on September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee 
held a hearing entitled ``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving 
Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons 
Learned.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael 
Borras, Undersecretary for Management, Department of Homeland 
Security; Ms. Michele Mackin, Director, GAO; Ms. Anne Richards, 
Assistant Inspector General for Audits, DHS Office of Inspector 
General; Mr. William C. Greenwalt, Visiting Fellow, American 
Enterprise Institute; Mr. Stan Soloway, President and CEO, 
Professional Services Council; Mr. David Berteau, Senior Vice 
President, Center for Strategic and International Studies. The 
purpose of the hearing was to examine DHS's acquisition 
practices to determine if the Department is effectively 
implementing its policies and to assess whether DHS could 
leverage best practices and lessons learned from the Defense 
Department and the private sector.

                              ----------                              


                       Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How Wisely is DHS Spending 
        Taxpayer Dollars?'' February 15, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
        2)
``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS Harnessed 
        IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration Laws?'' 
        March 19, 2013. (Serial No. 113-7)
``The Impact of Sequestration on Homeland Security: Scare 
        Tactics or Possible Threat?'' April 12, 2013. (Serial 
        No. 113-10)
``Cutting DHS Duplication and Wasteful Spending: Implementing 
        Private Sector Best Practices and Watchdog 
        Recommendations.'' April 26, 2013. (Serial No. 113-14)
``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate with the American People?'' 
        June 14, 2013. (Serial No. 113-22)
``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's Extending Influence in the 
        Western Hemisphere.'' July 9, 2013. (Serial No. 113-22)
``TSA Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by Airport 
        Security Personnel.'' Joint hearing with the 
        Subcommittee on Transportation Security. July 31, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-29)
``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers 
        Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons Learned.'''' 
        September 19, 2013. (Serial No. 113-3)
``Facility Protection: Implications of the Navy Yard Shooting 
        on Homeland Security.'' October 30, 2013. (Serial No. 
        113-40)
``DHS Financial Management: Investigating DHS's Stewardship of 
        Taxpayer Dollars.'' November 15, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
        44)
                Subcommittee on Transportation Security

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Vice Chair
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security held six hearings, 
receiving testimony from 18 witnesses, and considered two 
measures.

                              ----------                              


               Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee



                         HELPING HEROES FLY ACT

             Pub. Law 113-27, H.R. 1344 (S. 1367, S. 1403)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant 
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) to provide expedited air passenger screening to 
severely injured or disabled members of the Armed Forces and 
severely injured or disabled veterans, and for other purposes.

Summary

    This law directs the Transportation Security Administration 
(TSA) to develop and implement a process to ease travel and, to 
the extent possible, provide expedited passenger screening 
services for severely injured or disabled Armed Forces members 
and veterans, and their accompanying family members or non-
medical attendants. The TSA is required to maintain an 
operations center to provide for the movement of such members 
and veterans through screening before boarding a domestic or 
foreign passenger aircraft. Additionally, the law requires TSA 
to establish and publish certain protocols to contact the 
operations center to request expedited screening services for 
the service member or veteran. Furthermore, the TSA is directed 
to annually report to Congress on the implementation of the 
program. The TSA retains its flexibility to require additional 
screening of any individual if intelligence or law enforcement 
information indicates that additional screening is necessary.
    As of March 2013, TSA began implementing the policies 
codified in this law at security screening checkpoints. This 
law seeks to facilitat the screening of our Nation's wounded 
warriors' through airports and free up TSA screeners to focus 
on real threats to our aviation systems. The Committee has long 
advocated for less onerous airport screening for our men and 
women in uniform. In fact, this bill builds upon past 
legislation promoted by the Committee, including the Risk-Based 
Security Screening for Members of the Armed Forces Act (Pub. L. 
112-86), which requires TSA to provide expedited screening to 
active duty military traveling on official orders.

Legislative History

    H.R. 1344 was introduced in the House on March 21, 2013, by 
Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Joyce, and Mr. Richmond, and referred to the 
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1344 
was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    The House considered H.R. 1344 on May 21, 2013, under 
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\ 
recorded vote of 413 yeas with none voting ``nay'', (Roll No. 
166)/
    H.R. 1344 was received in the Senate on May 22, 2013, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.
    On August 1, 2013, the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation was discharged from further 
consideration of H.R. 1344 by unanimous consent. The Senate 
then passed H.R. 1344, with an amendment, by unanimous consent.
    The House concurred in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1344, 
on August 2, 2013, by unanimous consent.
    H.R. 1344 was presented to the President on August 6, 2013, 
and signed into law on August 9, 2013, as Public Law 113-27.

    S. 1367, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the 
Senate on July 25, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and 
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation.

    S. 1403, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the 
Senate on July 31, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and 
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation. The text of S. 1403 was adopted by the Senate 
during consideration of H.R. 1344 on August 1, 2013.

                          TSA LOOSE CHANGE ACT

                               H.R. 1095

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant 
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee, and for other purposes.

Summary

    H.R. 1095 directs the Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA) to transfer unclaimed monies recovered at 
airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations 
providing places of rest and recuperation at airports for 
members of the Armed Forces and their families, and establishes 
a request for proposals (RFP) process to select such 
organizations.
    Section 44945 of title 49, U.S.C., enacted as part of 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. 
L. 108-334), authorized and directed unclaimed money collected 
at airport security checkpoints to be used for civil aviation 
security. According to the report ``FY 2012 Unclaimed Money at 
Airports,'' which was prepared by TSA, from FY 2009 through FY 
2012, TSA has collected an average of $465,285 from airport 
security checkpoints annually. Just in FY 2012 alone, TSA 
collected $531,395. However as of March 1, 2013, TSA only 
expended $6,539 for the purpose of civil aviation security.
    The Explanatory Statement contained in the Conference 
Report (H. Rpt. 112-492) that accompanied the Consolidated and 
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, (Pub. L. 113-6), 
required TSA to issue a report on the feasibility of 
transferring the unclaimed money recovered at airport 
checkpoints to non-profit organizations that are selected on a 
competitive basis. According to the report, it would cost the 
Federal Government approximately $201,000 for the first year 
alone if TSA was to transfer the money to a nonprofit 
organization selected on a competitive basis. Further, the 
report concluded that to minimize administrative overhead, TSA 
would prefer to award the use of funding to one nonprofit 
organization. After reviewing TSA's report, the Committee 
believes that in order to ensure fairness of opportunity while 
minimizing administrative overhead, TSA should transfer the 
funds after a RFP is issued. Currently, United Services 
Organizations (USO) is the sole non-profit operating airport 
lounges for military service members and their families. 
However, any non-profit organization that provides these kinds 
of services can submit a proposal to TSA to seek these 
unclaimed funds.

Legislative History

112th Congress
    H.R. 2179 was introduced in the House on June 14, 2011, by 
Mr. Miller of Florida and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2179 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    On March 7, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security considered H.R. 2179 and reported the measure to the 
Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, without 
amendment, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 2179 on March 28, 2012, 
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House, 
amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 2179 to the House on May 8, 
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-468.

113th Congress
    H.R. 1095 was introduced in the House on March 12, 2013, by 
Mr. Miller of Florida and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred 
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, 
H.R. 1095 was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation 
Security.
    On October 29, 2013, the Chair discharged the Subcommittee 
on Transportation Security from further consideration of H.R. 
1095.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 1095 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1095 to the House on November 
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-274.
    The House considered H.R. 1095 under Suspension of the 
Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
    H.R. 1095 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013, 
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

        AVIATION SECURITY STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2013

                               H.R. 1204

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant 
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee, and for other purposes.

Summary

    H.R. 1204 authorizes the Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee (ASAC) and requires Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA) to consult with the ASAC on aviation 
security matters, including on the development and 
implementation of policies, programs, rulemakings and security 
directives. Additionally, the bill requires the ASAC to submit 
recommendations to TSA.
    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) established the 
ASAC in 1989 following the bombing of Pan American World 
Airways Flight 103. Upon the establishment of TSA, sponsorship 
of the ASAC was transferred to TSA. However, despite strong 
support from aviation security stakeholders who participated in 
the ASAC, TSA has allowed the ASAC's charter to expire. On July 
7, 2011, TSA published an announcement in the Federal Register 
to re-establish the ASAC, providing a setting for the aviation 
industry to formally communicate with TSA and on October 27, 
2011, the Secretary of Homeland Security appointed 24 new 
members to the ASAC. On June 11, 2013, TSA published a notice 
of charter renewal in the Federal Register to announce the 
renewal of the ASAC. This legislation not only codifies current 
Department and TSA policy but also ensures that the ASAC 
remains intact.
    In these dire budgetary times, it is imperative that TSA 
interact with industry stakeholders for input on security 
procedures and technology to ensure that the Administration is 
spending its limited resources on initiatives that will enhance 
aviation security for the traveling public.

Legislative History

112th Congress
    H.R.1447 was introduced in the House on April 8, 2011, by 
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi and Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the 
Committee, H.R.1447 was referred to the Subcommittee on 
Transportation Security.
    On September 21, 2011, the Chair discharged the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security from further 
consideration of H.R.1447. The Committee proceeded to the 
consideration of H.R.1447 and ordered the measure to be 
reported to the House, without amendment, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R.1447 to the House on November 4, 
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-269.
    The House considered H.R.1447 under Suspension of the 
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012 
by voice vote.
    H.R.1447 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read 
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

113th Congress
    H.R. 1204 was introduced in the House on March 14, 2013, by 
Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Richmond, Ms. Jackson Lee, and 
Mr. Swalwell of California and referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1204 was referred 
to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    The Subcommittee considered H.R. 1204 on July 24, 2013, and 
forwarded H.R. 1204 to the Full Committee with a favorable 
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 1204 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1204 to the House on December 
2, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-278.
    The House considered H.R. 1204 under Suspension of the 
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 411 
yeas and 3 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 617).
    H.R. 1204 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013, 
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

    S. 1804, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in 
the Senate on December 11, 2013.

             TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ACQUISITION REFORM ACT

                               H.R. 2719

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 
implement best practices and improve transparency with regard 
to technology acquisition programs, and for other purposes.

Summary

    H.R. 2719 was developed with valuable input from 
stakeholders across the Federal Government and industry. The 
bill introduces greater transparency and accountability for the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) spending decisions 
through a series of commonsense reforms. Specifically, it 
requires TSA to develop and share with the public, for the 
first time: A strategic, multiyear technology investment plan; 
share key information with Congress on technology acquisitions, 
including cost overruns, delays, or technical failures within 
30 days of identifying the problem; establish principles for 
managing equipment in inventory to eliminate expensive storage 
of unusable or outdated technologies; and report on its goals 
for contracting with small businesses.
    H.R. 2719 requires TSA to do a better job of not only 
managing its own resources, but also leveraging resources 
outside of the Department of Homeland Security.

Legislative History

    H.R. 2719 was introduced in the House on July 18, 2013, by 
Mr. Hudson, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Richmond, and Mr. Thompson of 
Mississippi, and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2719 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
    The Subcommittee considered H.R. 2719 on July 24, 2013, and 
forwarded H.R. 2719 to the Full Committee with a favorable 
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 2719 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 2719 to the House on November 
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-275.
    The House considered H.R. 2719 under Suspension of the 
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 416 
yeas and 0 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 616).
    H.R. 2719 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013, 
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation.

                              ----------                              


                Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee


                 TSA'S PASSENGER SCREENING TECHNOLOGIES

    On February 5, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee on 
Transportation Security and the Subcommittee on Oversight and 
Management Efficiency received a joint classified briefing on 
the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) Passenger 
Screening Technologies. The Subcommittees were briefed by 
representatives from the Government Accountability Office and 
the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector 
General.
    The Subcommittee on Transportation Security continued to 
examine this issue with a second classified Member briefing on 
March 18, 2013. Representatives from TSA were present to 
respond to Member questions.

                 TSA'S RISK-BASED SECURITY INITIATIVES

    Since 2011, the Transportation Security Administration 
(TSA) has launched a series of risk-based security (RBS) 
initiatives aimed at improving passenger experience and 
security, including but not limited to Pre-Check, an expedited 
screening program for certain domestic travelers. In addition, 
TSA has applied a risk-based strategy to achieve the 100 
percent screening of international inbound cargo on passenger 
aircraft, and continues to work with the air cargo industry on 
implementing RBS initiatives. Unfortunately, to date, TSA has 
not made similar efforts to streamline and reform its surface 
transportation programs, such as the Visible Intermodal 
Prevention and Response (VIPR) Program or develop a method by 
which the agency can display the value or cost-effectiveness of 
the programs.
    On March 14, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based Security.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John S. Pistole, 
Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, 
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was 
to provide an opportunity for the TSA Administrator to discuss 
efforts of applying a risk-based approach to TSA's aviation and 
surface transportation programs and ongoing efforts to make TSA 
more effective and efficient.
    The Subcommittee continued its oversight with a hearing on 
April 11, 2013, entitled ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based 
Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Mr. Ken Dunlap, Global Director, Security & 
Travel Facilitation, International Air Transport Association; 
Ms. Sharon L. Pinkerton, Senior Vice President, Legislative and 
Regulatory Policy, Airlines for America; Mr. Geoff Freeman, 
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President, U.S. 
Travel Association; Mr. Michael C. Mullen, Executive Director, 
Express Association of America; Mr. Christopher U. Browne, 
Airport Manager, Washington Dulles International Airport, 
testifying on behalf of the American Association of Airport 
Executives; and Mr. David A. Borer, General Counsel, American 
Federation of Government Employees. This hearing was the second 
in a two-part series focused on TSA's RBS initiatives. This 
hearing provided an opportunity to hear from industry 
stakeholders on their perspectives of the initiatives. In 
addition, on April 9, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent 
a letter to the President of the Association of Professional 
Flight Attendants, regarding the association's concerns on 
TSA's changes to the Prohibited Items List.
    The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on June 19, 2013, 
on TSA's PreCheck Program.

                         TSA PROCUREMENT REFORM

    Technology procurement missteps have a large quantifiable 
cost to taxpayers. The Transportation Security Administration 
(TSA) must take immediate steps to address its technology 
procurement challenges and implement necessary reforms in order 
to eliminate the wasteful technology expenditures that do not 
make Americans safer.
    The Subcommittee held a hearing on May 8, 2013, entitled 
``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving Taxpayer Dollars Through 
Smarter Spending Practices.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Ms. Karen Shelton Waters, Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Acquisition, Transportation Security 
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Paul 
Benda, Director, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Science & 
Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 
Mr. Stephen M. Lord, Director, Forensic Audits and 
Investigative Services, U.S. Government Accountability Office; 
and Mr. Charles K. Edwards, Deputy Inspector General, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of this hearing 
was to address how TSA can improve and streamline its internal 
processes for procurement and increase small business 
participation while engaging the private sector in the research 
and development of new security technologies.
    The TSA expends significant funds each year on developing, 
purchasing, and maintaining screening technology. For example, 
in FY 2012, TSA spent more than $550 million for explosives 
detection screening technology, about two-thirds of which was 
for equipment procurements, and the rest for maintenance. The 
TSA is by far the largest purchaser of detection equipment in 
the Department of Homeland Security, with approximately $3 
billion in inventories, deployed across all major U.S. airports 
and multiple storage locations. The Government Accountability 
Office and the Department of Homeland Security Office of 
Inspector General have found, through numerous studies, that 
TSA is not effectively implementing government best practices 
and DHS policy for acquiring new security capabilities. This 
has resulted in acquisitions that have failed to meet security 
performance objectives and have wasted taxpayers dollars.
    The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 17, 2013, entitled 
``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA Acquisition Reform.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Marc Pearl, President 
& CEO, Homeland Security & Defense Business Council; Ms. Shene 
Commodore, Government Contracts & Business Manager, Intertek, 
testifying on behalf of the Security Industry Association; and 
Mr. Dolan P. Falconer, Jr., Co-Founder, Chairman & General 
Manger, Scan Tech Holdings. The focus of this hearing was to 
obtain industry perspective on how TSA can improve and 
streamline its internal processes for technology acquisition.

                          PASSENGER EXIT LANES

    During the first week of June 2013, each affected airport 
received a proposed amendment to its Airport Security Program 
(ASP) shifting access control responsibilities to the airport 
operators at an estimated taxpayer savings of $100 million 
annually, according to the Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA). Following delivery of the proposed 
amendment, each airport operator was provided a 45-day Notice 
and Comment period to share its thoughts and concerns on how 
the amendment affects its particular operations. The TSA 
reviewed comments from each airport and responded to individual 
concerns. After the review, TSA changed the language before 
issuing the amendments to clarify some matters in response to 
the comments. In accordance with TSA rules, some airports 
submitted petitions asking that TSA reconsider the amendments. 
Under its current plan, TSA will provide a one month extension 
to February 1, 2014, to certain airports, while others will be 
notified to staff their exit lanes beginning January 1, 2014. 
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 (H.J. Res. 59) 
which passed the House on December 12, 2013, and the Senate on 
December 19, 2012, contains a provision requiring TSA to 
continue monitoring passenger exit points from the sterile area 
of airports which the agency provided such monitoring as of 
December 1, 2013. H.J. Res. 59 has been presented to the 
President and is awaiting signature.
    The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on June 27, 2013, 
on TSA's plans to transfer the responsibility of monitoring 
passenger exit lanes to local airport operators. 
Representatives from TSA were present to respond to Member 
questions.
    The Department of Homeland Security's Fiscal Year 2014 
budget request included a proposal to shift the responsibility 
for exit lane monitoring from TSA to the Airport Operators at 
certain locations.
    The TSA decided to transfer the responsibility through an 
amendment to the airport's Airport Security Program rather than 
through the formal rulemaking process. On October 18, 2013, the 
Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a letter to 
the Administrator of TSA regarding the process the 
Administration chose to follow to implement the transition. The 
TSA provided a response on November 4, 2013.

                        TSA PERSONNEL MISCONDUCT

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is one of 
the most publicly visible components of the Department of 
Homeland Security. With TSA assuming a front-line, high-profile 
position in the fight against terrorism, the agency is often in 
the spotlight when allegations of misconduct arise.
    The Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency and 
the Subcommittee on Transportation Security held a joint 
hearing on July 31, 2013, entitled ``TSA Integrity Challenges: 
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.'' The 
Subcommittees received testimony from Mr. John Halinski, Deputy 
Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen M. Lord, Director, 
Forensic Audits and Investigative Services, Government 
Accountability Office; and Ms. Deborah Outten-Mills, Acting 
Assistant Inspector General for Inspections, Office of 
Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The 
purpose of this hearing was to examine how TSA handles 
allegations of misconduct among its employees including its 
investigation and adjudication process and to discuss the 
hiring practices, policies and training it has in place to 
deter criminal or negligent behavior.

                       DHS RESEARCH LABORATORIES

    On November 6, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee conducted 
a site visit to Duke University in Durham, North Carolina to 
examine the University's homeland security research 
laboratories and receive a briefing by researchers on their on-
going Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology 
Directorate-funded research, which seeks to develop future 
generations of airport screening technologies.

                           AVIATION SECURITY

    The leadership of the Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA) receives a daily classified aviation 
intelligence briefing at the TSA headquarters in Arlington, 
Virginia every morning. On February 14, 2013, the Chair of the 
Subcommittee attended this briefing to better understand the 
terrorist threats to U.S. transportation systems.
    On March 7, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a 
letter to the Comptroller General of the U. S. requesting to be 
a co-requestor of the Government Accountability Offices (GAO) 
review of TSA's Secure Flight Program.
    On March 20, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee received an update from the Administrator of TSA 
on TSA's Screening Partnership Program.
    In 2003, Congress directed the Department of Homeland 
Security through the Vision 100-Century Aviation 
Reauthorization Act (Pub. L. 108-176) to develop a program to 
ensure security of domestic and international aircraft repair 
stations. After no action was taken, in 2007 Congress mandated 
through the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission 
Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-53), that TSA issue a final rule on 
aircraft repair station security by August 2008, otherwise the 
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would no longer be 
authorized to certificate new foreign repair stations for U.S.-
bound aircraft, Implementing. The TSA missed the deadline, and 
FAA certifications of new foreign repair stations were halted. 
In November 2009, TSA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
(NPRM) for repair station security, with the comment period 
ending on February 19, 2010. Although the comment period ended 
over three years ago, TSA has yet to issue a final rule. On 
March 14, 2013, the TSA Administrator announced to the 
Subcommittee at the hearing entitled ``TSA's Efforts to Advance 
Risk-Based Security,'' that the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) received the rule. In response to the announcement, the 
Chair and Vice Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter on April 
18, 2013, to the Deputy Director for Management of the Office 
of Management and Budget regarding the status of the Aircraft 
Foreign Repair Station Rulemaking.
    The Department of Homeland Security's FY 2014 budget 
request eliminated funding for TSA's Federal Flight Deck 
Officer (FFDO) program. On June 6, 2013, the Chairs of the 
Subcommittee on Transportation Security and the Subcommittee on 
Oversight and Management Efficiency sent a letter to the 
Secretary of Homeland Security expressing concern over the 
proposed elimination of funding for the FFDO program. The 
Department provided a response on July 29, 2013.
    On September 25, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a 
letter to the Comptroller General of the U.S. requesting to be 
a co-requester of GAO's review of TSA's Pre-Check trusted 
traveler program.

             TSA'S BEHAVIOR DETECTION AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM

    The Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) 
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques (SPOT) 
program involves Behavior Detection Officers (BDO) observing 
passenger behavior inside the airport. BDOs are trained to 
detect individuals exhibiting suspicious behaviors that 
indicate they may be a threat to transportation security.
    The Subcommittee held a hearing on November 14, 2013, 
entitled ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial Lessons From the LAX 
Shooting.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John 
S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security 
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Dr. 
Daniel Gerstein, Acting Under Secretary, Science and Technology 
Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen 
M. Lord, Managing Director, Forensic Audits and Investigative 
Service, Government Accountability Office; and Mr. Charles K. 
Edwards, Deputy Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of this 
hearing was to examine challenges with TSA's SPOT Program and 
to gauge whether SPOT is a scientifically valid program.
    On May 29, 2013, the Department of Homeland Security's 
Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued a report on the 
SPOT program entitled Transportation Security Administration's 
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques [OIG-13-91]. 
The OIG concluded in its report that: TSA did not assess the 
effectiveness of the SPOT program; have a comprehensive 
training program for SPOT; ensure outreach to its partners 
regarding the implementation and operation of SPOT; or have a 
financial plan for the SPOT Program prior to Nation-wide 
implementation.
    On September 9, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a 
letter to the Comptroller General of the U.S. requesting to be 
a co-requester of a Government Accountability Office (GAO) 
review of TSA's SPOT program.
    On November 13, 2013, GAO released a report entitled, TSA 
Should Limit Future Funding for Behavior Detection Activities. 
[GAO-14-158T] The report found, among other things, that 
available evidence does not conclusively support whether 
behavioral indicators, which are used in the SPOT program, can 
be used to identify persons who may pose a risk to aviation 
security.

                        CANINE BREEDING PROGRAM

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) canceled 
its explosive detection canine breeding program at Lackland Air 
force Base based on a determination that the program was not 
producing enough explosives detection canines to justify the 
annual costs. In response to TSA's decision, on June 18, 2013, 
the Chair and Vice Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to 
the Secretary of Homeland Security expressing concerns about 
how the research and development that was achieved under the 
program would be used in the future. The Department provided a 
response on July 15, 2013.

           SHOOTING AT THE LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

    On November 1, 2013, a gunman entered Terminal 3 of the Los 
Angeles International Airport (LAX), approached the passenger 
screening area and shot and killed Gerardo I. Hernandez, a 
Transportation Security Officer (TSO) who was checking 
passenger boarding passes. After shooting and killing Officer 
Hernandez, the first TSA employee to be killed while performing 
his duties, the gunman shot and injured two additional TSOs and 
one passenger, none of whom were fatally wounded. Upon 
engaging, shooting, and taking the gunman down, Officers of the 
Los Angeles World Airport's Police Division found a note on the 
gunman's person expressing anti-government views and his intent 
to target and kill TSA employees.
    On November 15, 2013, the Chair and Ranking Member of the 
Full Committee, the Chair and Ranking Memmber of the 
Subcommittee and Representatives Waters and McKeon introduced 
H.Res. 415, expressing the sense of the House of 
Representatives with respect to the tragic shooting at LAX and 
honoring the dedicated public service of the TSO killed and the 
TSOs injured in the incident.

                              ----------                              


                       Subcommittee Hearings Held

``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based Security.'' March 14, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-5)
``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based Security: Stakeholder 
        Perspectives.'' April 11. (Serial No. 113-5)
``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving Taxpayer Dollars Through 
        Smarter Spending Practices.'' May 8, 2013. (Serial No. 
        113-15)
``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA Acquisition Reform.'' July 
        17, 2013. (Serial No. 113-26)
``TSA Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by Airport 
        Security Personnel.'' Joint hearing with the 
        Subcommittee on Transportation Security. July 31, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-29)
``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial Lessons From the LAX 
        Shooting.'' November 14, 2013. (Serial No. 113-43)
  Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi, 
Vice Chair
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              ----------                              


    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications held six hearings, receiving testimony from 31 
witnesses.

                              ----------                              


               Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee



                 MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS ALLOWABLE USE ACT

                               H.R. 1791

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority 
under existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area 
Security Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program 
funding for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge 
capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities.

Summary

    H.R. 1791 amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 
107-296) to ensure that grants funds may continue to be used 
for medical preparedness activities.

Legislative History

112th Congress
    H.R. 5997 was introduced in the House on June 21, 2012, by 
Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Clarke of Michigan, Mr. Turner of New York, 
and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5997 was referred 
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications.
    The House considered H.R. 5997 under Suspension of the 
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by a 
\2/3\ recorded vote of 397 yeas and 1 nay (Roll No. 609).

113th Congress
    H.R. 1791 was introduced in the House on April 26, 2013, by 
Mr. Bilirakis, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, and Mr. King of New 
York; and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. 
Within the Committee, H.R. 1791 was referred to the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications.
    On October 29, 2013, the Chair discharged the Subcommittee 
on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications from 
further consideration of H.R. 1791.
    The Full Committee considered H.R. 1791 on October 29, 
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with 
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
    The Committee reported H.R. 1791 to the House on November 
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-273.

                              ----------                              


                Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee


                            SUPERSTORM SANDY

    Superstorm Sandy made landfall in New Jersey on October 29, 
2012. Impacting the East Coast from Florida to Maine, the 
National Hurricane Center cites damage estimates of $50 
billion, the second costliest disaster in U.S. history. In 
response to the storm, Congress passed the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, which the President signed on January 29, 
2013 (Pub. L. 113-2). This Act appropriated $50 billion to fund 
response and recovery efforts related to the storm. To date, 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has provided 
more than $1.4 billion in Individual Assistance to disaster 
survivors and $3.2 billion in Public Assistance to state, 
local, and tribal governments for emergency protective 
measures, debris removal, and repair and replacement of 
infrastructure in the hardest hit areas. Throughout the 113th 
Congress, the Subcommittee has conducted oversight of Federal 
efforts to assist states, localities, tribes, and individuals 
impacted by the storm.
    On January 11, 2013, Committee staff attended the FEMA 
Office of Response and Recovery's quarterly briefing and 
received an update on changes to the National Flood Insurance 
Program and Hurricane Sandy recovery.
    On February 12, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee 
conducted a site visit to FEMAs National Response Coordination 
Center in Washington, D.C. This visit provided Members with an 
overview of FEMA's mission, operations, and efforts to work 
with its State, local, and private sector partners as well as 
ongoing Superstorm Sandy recovery efforts. Members met with the 
FEMA Administrator and other officials from throughout the 
agency. Following the briefing, Members toured the National 
Response Coordination Center.
    The Members of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit to 
the American Red Cross' Disaster Operations Center and Digital 
Disaster Operations Center on March 12, 2013. The visit 
provided information on the Red Cross' role in disaster 
response and services it provides through its local chapters, 
including an update on the Red Cross' response to Superstorm 
Sandy.
    On March 15, 2013, Committee staff attended the FEMA Office 
of Response and Recovery's quarterly briefing and received an 
update on implementation of the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act 
of 2013 (Pub. L. 113-2), changes to the National Flood 
Insurance Program, and Tribal declarations.
    On March 25, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
of the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector 
General to discuss oversight of Hurricane Sandy response and 
recovery efforts.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the 
Comptroller General of the U.S. on April 22, 2013, requesting 
that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) review 
Individual Assistance provided by FEMA after Superstorm Sandy 
to ensure there were no improper payments. The GAO has agreed 
to this request and the review is ongoing.
    On June 10, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the 
U.S. requesting that GAO conduct a review of FEMA's response to 
Superstorm Sandy, including a comparison with the Agency's 
response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The GAO has agreed to 
this request and the review is ongoing.
    Committee staff attended the FEMA Office of Response an 
Recovery's quarterly briefing on June 28, 2013, and received an 
update on the implementation of the Sandy Recovery Improvements 
Act and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    On August 26, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives from GAO to discuss their review of improper 
Individual Assistance payments made by the FEMA in the 
aftermath of Superstorm Sandy.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee met with representatives of 
the American Red Cross on October 2, 2013 to discuss ongoing 
Red Cross response and recovery efforts to Superstorm Sandy.
    On October 21, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response 
regarding its efforts in response to Superstorm Sandy and 
lessons learned for future response efforts.

             DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY

    Since the beginning of the 113th Congress, states and 
localities have experienced a string of disasters including: a 
successful terrorist attack in Boston, tornadoes in multiple 
states, wildfires, and flooding. It is imperative that the 
Federal Government, along with its partners at the State and 
local levels and the private sector, work to prepare for and 
respond to terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and other 
emergencies.
    Members of the Subcommittee attended a briefing conducted 
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on March 21, 
2013, to obtain information on National Flood Week.
    On March 28, 2013, Committee staff attended a briefing on 
the implementation of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform 
Act of 2012 (Subtitle A of Title II, of Pub. L. 113-41).
    On June 6, 2013, Committee staff attended a briefing 
conducted by FEMA on the roll out of the Planning Frameworks 
mandated by Presidential Policy Directive-8 (PPD-8: National 
Preparedness).
    On June 10, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the 
U.S. requesting that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 
review the use of disaster assistance funding for direct 
administrative costs. The GAO has agreed to this request and 
the review is ongoing.
    On June 21, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and 
Communications the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
Efficiency, the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and 
the Chair of the Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee on 
Emergency Management, Intergovernmental Affairs, and the 
District of Columbia, sent a letter to the Administrator of 
FEMA, regarding its Public Assistance program. The Committee 
received an interim response to this letter on November 26, 
2013.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
the Department of Homeland Security's National Protection and 
Programs Directorate and the United States Secret Service, the 
Department of Education, and the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation on July 31, 2013 on interagency school security 
efforts.
    On August 6, 2013, the Subcommittee held a field hearing in 
Carmel, Indiana entitled ``Assessing Central Indiana's 
Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.'' The Subcommittee 
received testimony from Mr. Andrew Velasquez, III, Regional 
Administrator, FEMA Region 5, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. John Hill, Executive Director, Indiana Department 
of Homeland Security; Mr. Mark Bowen, Sheriff, Hamilton County, 
Indiana; Mr. Steven Orusa, Fire Chief, Fishers, Indiana; Ms. 
Diane Mack, University Director, Emergency Management and 
Continuity, Indiana University; Mr. Chad Priest, Chief 
Executive Officer, MESH Coalition, Inc.; Dr. Virginia Caine, 
Director, Public Health Administration, Marion County (IN) 
Public Health Department; Louis Profeta, M.D., F.A.C.E.P., 
Medical Director of Disaster Preparedness, St. Vincent 
Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana; Dr. H. Clifton Knight, Chief 
Medical Officer, Community Health Network; R. Lawrence Reed, 
II, M.D., F.A.C.S., F.C.C., Director of Trauma Services, 
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital; and Dr. Mercy 
Obeime, Director, Community and Global Health, Franciscan St. 
Francis Health, Indianapolis, Indiana. This hearing explored 
ongoing efforts at the Federal, State, local, and non-profit 
level to secure our most vital assets from a wide range of 
threats, including mass casualty events.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee addressed the Hazus Users 
Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana on August 7, 2013.
    On August 28, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from representatives from FEMA regarding preparations for 
addressing the needs of children during disasters.
    On September 4, 2013, Committee staff conducted a site 
visit of the Mount Weather Emergency Operations Center in 
Virginia to receive a tour and briefing of the Federal 
Government's continuity of operations programs.
    Committee staff participated in a conference call held by 
the FEMA on September 17, 2013, regarding the response to the 
wildfires in Colorado.
    On September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Assessing the Nation's State of Preparedness: A 
Federal, State, and Local Perspective.'' The Subcommittee 
received testimony from Hon. Timothy Manning, Deputy 
Administrator, Protection and National Preparedness, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. Mark Ghilarducci, Director, California Governor's 
Office of Emergency Services, testifying on behalf of the 
National Governors Association and the Governors Homeland 
Security Advisors Council; Mr. Jeffrey W. Walker, Senior 
Emergency Manager, Licking County, Ohio, testifying on behalf 
of the International Association of Emergency Managers; Chief 
James H. Schwartz, Fire Chief, Arlington County Fire 
Department, Arlington, Virginia, testifying on behalf of the 
International Association of Fire Chiefs; Ms. Kathy Spangler, 
Vice President, U.S. Programs, Save the Children. This hearing 
provided Subcommittee Members with an opportunity to reflect on 
the gains the nation has made in preparedness over the past 12 
years and the challenges that still remain.
    Committee staff received a classified briefing from 
representatives from FEMA regarding its continuity of 
operations and continuity of government operations on September 
23, 2013.
    On November 19, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee 
participated in a panel discussion hosted by POLITICO in 
Washington, D.C. on emergency and disaster response.

                          MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS

    The mission of the Department of Homeland Security's Office 
of Health Affairs is to provide health and medical expertise in 
support of the Department's mission to prepare for, respond to, 
and recover from all hazards impacting the Nation's health 
security. As a result, the Subcommittee conducted a number of 
oversight activities related to the Office of Health Affairs 
and other vital medical preparedness activities.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Health 
Affairs (OHA) on February 28, 2013, on OHA's mission and 
programs, including BioWatch, the National Biosurveillance 
Integration Center, and workforce health initiatives.
    On April 3, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from the American College of Emergency Physicians.
    On April 11, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from OHA to discuss the President's Fiscal Year 2014 budget 
request for OHA.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee met with the Director, Office 
of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention on April 18, 2013, to discuss medical 
preparedness and the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS).
    On May 6, 2013, Committee staff met with the DHS Acting 
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs to discuss medial 
preparedness and OHA priorities.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Department 
of Health and Human Services' Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Preparedness and Response to receive a briefing on current 
operations.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee gave the keynote address at 
the National Emergency Support Function 8 conference in 
Indianapolis, Indiana on June 25, 2013.
    On July 2, 2013, Committee staff participated in a 
conference call held by the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention regarding the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome 
(MERS) virus and H7N9 influenza.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Emergency 
Services Coalition on Medical Preparedness on July 9, 2013, to 
discuss medical countermeasures for first responders.
    On September 3, 2013, Committee staff met with the Acting 
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs to discuss ongoing 
activities within the Office of Health Affairs.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
the Institute of Medicine on September 11, 2013 regarding their 
report on the resilience of the Department of Homeland Security 
workforce.

   OUTREACH TO STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE PRIVATE 
                                 SECTOR

    Throughout the 113th Congress, Committee staff met with 
various Federal agencies and stakeholder groups representing 
the first responder and emergency management communities to 
discuss issues of concern to their membership. These meetings 
included the International Association of Fire Chiefs, the 
National Emergency Management Association, the International 
Association of Emergency Managers, the National Sheriff's 
Association, the Major Cities Chiefs, the Jewish Federations of 
North America, and the American Red Cross.
    On February 11, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee visited 
the Indiana Intelligence Fusion Center to learn more about 
their mission and their experience sharing information with 
Federal, State, and local partners.
    On February 15, 2013, Committee staff conducted a 
conference call with the Executive Director of the Indiana 
Department of Homeland Security to receive an update on the 
Department's priorities.
    On March 20, 2013, Committee staff participated in a panel 
discussion at the National Emergency Management Association's 
(NEMA) Mid Year Conference. Subsequently, on March 21, 2013, 
Committee staff attended a briefing with NEMA leadership to 
receive an update on their priorities.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee addressed a roundtable held 
by the Congressional Fire Services Institute on May 9, 2013.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee visited emergency management 
officials within Indiana on numerous occasions throughout the 
113th Congress; including in Hamilton County, on May 29, 2013, 
and Madison County on June 21, 2013.
    On August 7, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee addressed 
the National Association of State Fire Marshals Annual 
Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the 9/11 Museum 
Commission to discuss security efforts at the 9/11 Memorial 
site on November 21, 2013.

     EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL 
                      GOVERNMENTS AND INDIVIDUALS

    The Department of Homeland Security has distributed nearly 
$40 billion in grants to States and localities since the 
attacks of September 11, 2001. Administered by Federal 
Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Grant Programs 
Directorate, this funding is used to help jurisdictions 
prevent, prepare for, mitigate, and respond to terrorist 
attacks.
    In furtherance of the Subcommittee's work to ensure that 
grant expenditures are appropriately measured and monitored, on 
February 22, and 28, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives from FEMA to learn about its grants monitoring 
procedures and efforts to measure the effectiveness of these 
grants.
    Subsequent to these meetings, on March 19, 2013, the 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Homeland Security 
Grants: Measuring Our Investments.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Hon. Tim Manning, Deputy Administrator, 
Protection and National Preparedness, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Anne 
Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of 
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security; and Mr. 
David C. Maurer, Director, Homeland Security and Justice 
Issues, Government Accountability Office. This hearing examined 
the effectiveness and efficiency of homeland security grants 
and provided Members an opportunity to examine: The impact of 
these grants; how these grant dollars are utilized; how the 
impact is being; measured and how the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) and FEMA are ensuring that grants are being used 
in a manner appropriate to their intent.
    On March 28, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
of the National Fusion Center Association regarding the use of 
grants by fusion centers.
    Committee staff met with representatives of numerous local 
stakeholder groups on April 26, 2013, to discuss the proposed 
National Preparedness Grant Program.
    On May 9, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives of 
the National Governors' Association to discuss grants.
    Committee staff received a briefing from the FEMA's Grant 
Programs Directorate on May 20, 2013 on the Fiscal Year 2013 
guidance for the Homeland Security Grant Program and other FEMA 
administered programs.
    On June 13, 2013, Committee staff met with the Assistant 
Administrator of FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate to discuss 
FEMA's preparedness grants.
    Committee staff participated in a conference call held by 
FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate on June 17, 2013 regarding 
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessments.
    On June 18, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee received 
a classified briefing on the risk formula employed by FEMA to 
allocate State Homeland Security Grant Program and Urban Areas 
Security Initiative grants. Representatives from the FEMA's 
Grant Programs Directorate, the Office of Intelligence and 
Analysis, the Office of Infrastructure Protection, and Customs 
and Border Protection were present to respond to Member 
questions.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives 
from FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate on Fiscal Year 2013 
grant awards on August 22, 2013.
    Committee staff participated in a panel discussion at the 
National Governors Association Governors Homeland Security 
Advisors Council annual meeting on September 20, 2013, 
regarding homeland security grants.
    On September 25, 2013, Committee staff attended a briefing 
with representatives DHS's Office of Intelligence and Analysis 
regarding the National Network of Fusion Centers Assessment, 
including the use of grants to fund fusion centers.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate on efforts to monitor grant 
funds on November 12, 2013.

 PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND 
                            NUCLEAR THREATS

    Terrorists actively plot and have attempted to use weapons 
of mass destruction (WMD) to attack the United States. At a 
2010 Committee on Homeland Security hearing with the 
Commissioners of the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of 
Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism (WMD Commission), 
the Commissioners noted that ``it is more likely than not that 
there will be a weapon of mass destruction used someplace on 
earth by a terrorist group before the end of the year 2013 and 
that it is more likely that the weapons will be biological 
rather than nuclear.'' In the WMD Commission's report card on 
the Nation's efforts to protect the Nation for WMD terrorism, 
the Government received a grade of ``F'' on its efforts to 
enhance the Nation's capabilities for rapid response to prevent 
biological attacks from inflicting mass casualties.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives 
from Sandia National Laboratory regarding BioWatch and 
Generation--3 on January 29, 2013.
    On February 1, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 
to receive a briefing on agricultural security.
    On February 25, 2013, Committee staff met with the Director 
of Texas A&M University's Foreign and Zoonotic Disease Defense 
(FAZD) Center to receive a briefing of FAZD's biosurveillance 
efforts.
    On March 5, 2013, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing 
on the Office of Health Affairs' BioWatch program. The 
Assistant Secretary, Office of Health Affairs conducted the 
briefing and responded to Member questions.
    On March 25, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from GAO to discuss their work on BioWatch.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Health 
Affairs on April 3, 2013, regarding the National 
Biosurveillance Integration Center.
    On May 6, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from 
representatives from FEMA on the Radiological Emergency 
Preparedness Program.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Center for 
Strategic and International Studies and Sandia National 
Laboratory regarding the release of their report, A Biological 
Threat Prevention Strategy.
    The Chair of the Subcommittee met with the DHS's 
Undersecretary for Science and Technology to discuss chemical, 
biological, radiological, and nuclear threats.
    On September 25, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from representatives of the Office of Health Affairs regarding 
its Chemical Defense Program.
    The Chair and Ranking Member of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the 
U.S. on September 25, 2013, requesting that GAO review the 
progress made by the National Biosurveillance Integration 
Center, including an update of its December 2009 report, 
Biosurveillance: Developing a Collaboration Strategy is 
Essential to Fostering Interagency Data and Resource Sharing.
    On November 15, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee 
received a classified briefing on the Office of Health Affairs 
Chemical Defense Program. Representatives from the Office of 
Health Affairs, along with representatives from DHS's Office of 
Intelligence and Analysis, were present to brief the Members 
and respond to their questions.

                        EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

    The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, exposed 
communications failures with catastrophic implications. 
Communications challenges persisted during Hurricane Katrina. 
Since that time, great strides have been made in interoperable 
communications, including through the National Emergency 
Communications Plan and its associated goals and the 
establishment of the First Responder Network Authority 
(FirstNet). However, communications challenges remain.
    On January 28, 2013, Committee staff attended a roundtable 
to get stakeholder perspectives on the FirstNet and the 
development of the National Public Safety Broadband Network 
(PSBN).
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Office of 
Emergency Communications on February 22, 2013, to discuss the 
Department of Homeland Security's role on the FirstNet board 
and with the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC).
    On April 11, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials 
(APCO) International to discuss SAFECOM and the National Public 
Safety Broadband Network.
    On April 12, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from the Office of Emergency Communications to receive a 
briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2014 budget request for 
the Office.
    The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on April 16, 2013, 
on the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Emergency 
Communications. The Director of the Office of Emergency 
Communications, provided Members with an overview of OEC and 
its role in the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet).
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Interagency 
Communications Interoperability System on May 22, 2013 
regarding the Public Safety Broadband Network and the T-Band.
    On July 18, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from 
representatives of the Department of Commerce's National 
Telecommunications and Information Administration and the 
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Emergency 
Communications on FirstNet and the development of the Public 
Safety Broadband Network.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
the Office of Emergency Communications regarding OEC's efforts 
to update the National Emergency Communications Plan on 
September 6, 2013.
    On September 24, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of APCO International to discuss public safety 
communications issue.
    On November 21, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a 
letter to the Director of the Office of Emergency 
Communications, regarding the need to update the National 
Emergency Communications plan and requesting additional 
information on the Office of Emergency Communications' efforts 
to do so.

                    SOCIAL MEDIA AND NEW TECHNOLOGY

    In today's technology driven world, social media and other 
types of new technology are becoming one of the primary ways 
people receive, process, and relay information. Studies have 
shown that more than 60 percent of the people in the United 
States have at least one social media account, with many having 
multiple accounts including Facebook pages, Twitter profiles, 
and Pinterest boards. While social media originally started out 
as a way to share information among friends, it is evident that 
it has evolved to serve other functions, and is a prevalent 
source for news, advertising, and entertainment. There were 
numerous stories from Hurricane Sandy, the Boston Bombings, and 
the Oklahoma tornados of how citizens used Facebook, Twitter, 
and Instagram to relay information to first responders, 
communicate with love ones, and request assistance. The 
management of ``big data'' and the use of social media can 
provide enormous opportunities for efficiencies in emergency 
management.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on April 11, 2013, to 
discuss the Agency's use of social media, particularly as an 
aid in disaster response operations.
    On June 4, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are 
Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery #Disasters 
#Part1 #Privatesector.'' The Subcommittee received testimony 
from Mr. Matthew Stepka, Vice President, Technology for Social 
Impact, Google.org; Mr. Jason Matthew Payne, Philanthropy Lead, 
Palantir Technologies; Mr. Michael Beckerman, President and 
CEO, The Internet Association; and Mr. Jorge L. Cardenas, Vice 
President, Asset Management and Centralized Services, Public 
Service Enterprise Group, Inc. This hearing examined advances 
in social media and technology and their applications for 
disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.
    The Subcommittee continued its hearing on Emergency 
Management 2.0, with a hearing on July 9, 2013, entitled 
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are 
Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery #Disasters 
#Part2 #Govt/NGOs.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from 
Mr. Shayne Adamski, Senior Manager of Digital Engagement, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Ms. Suzanne C. DeFrancis, Chief Public 
Affairs Officer, American Red Cross; Mr. Albert Ashwood, 
Chairman, NEMA Legislative Committee, Director, Oklahoma 
Department of Emergency Management, testifying on behalf of the 
National Emergency Management Association; and Sergeant W. Greg 
Kierce, Director, Jersey City Office of Emergency, Management 
and Homeland Security. This hearing continued the discussion 
that began at the June 4th hearing and examined how emergency 
management practitioners are leveraging social media and new 
technology and working with the private sector to enhance their 
preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities, particularly 
through the lens of recent disasters.
    In preparation for these hearings, Committee staff met with 
various stakeholders in the public and private sectors to learn 
more about the applications of social media and new technology 
for disaster response and recovery.
    On June 12, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee met with 
the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology 
Undersecretary and the Director of the First Response Division 
to discuss advancements in technology for disaster preparedness 
and first responders.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Department 
of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate on 
June 27, 2013 ,to discuss the Virtual Social Media Working 
Group.
    On July 31, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives 
from FEMA to discuss FEMA's implementation of Executive Order 
13642, Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for 
Government Information.
    Committee staff attended the Social Media in Emergency 
summit at George Washington University on August 13, 2013.
    As a result of testimony about the need for open and 
machine readable disaster related data received by the 
Subcommittee at the June 4th Emergency MGMT 2.0 hearing, on 
November 19, 2013, the Chair and the Ranking Member of the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and 
Communications, the Chair of the Subcommittee on 
Counterterrorism and Intelligence, the Ranking Member of the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies, and other Members of the Committee, sent 
a letter to the Administrator of FEMA, regarding implementation 
of the requirements of Executive Order 13642.

                          ALERTS AND WARNINGS

    Terrorist attacks and natural disasters can occur at any 
time, often with little-to-no notice. Alerts and warnings 
provided in advance of potential threats and hazards can help 
to direct the public to seek safety. The benefit of alerts and 
warnings were evident during the November 2013 outbreak of 
tornadoes in the Midwest. Messages through sirens, television, 
radio, and cell phones alerted citizens to seek shelter from 
the storm and many noted that those messages got them out of 
harm's way.
    On April 22, 2013, Committee staff held a conference call 
with representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) to discuss the Integrated Public Alert and Warning 
System (IPAWS).
    On May 7, 2013, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing on 
FEMA's IPAWS. The Assistant Administrator of FEMA's National 
Continuity Programs (NCP) Directorate responded to Member 
concerns.
    Committee staff also met with stakeholders regarding alerts 
and warnings on numerous occasions throughout the 113th 
Congress.
    Committee staff participated in a conference call with 
representatives from FEMA to discuss IPAWS and the application 
of new technologies.
    Committee staff met with stakeholders to discuss 
legislation to authorize the Integrated Public Alert and 
Warning System on November 19, 2013.

                         TRAINING AND EXERCISES

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), through its 
National Exercise Division and partners such as the National 
Preparedness Consortium, supports training and exercises for 
emergency response providers. As terrorist continually change 
their tactics, these programs are vital for emergency response 
providers so they are prepared for the threats and hazards they 
face.
    On February 11, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of Texas A&M University, a member of the 
National Domestic Preparedness Consortium, to receive an update 
on current operations and training programs.
    On February 15, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of New Mexico Tech's Center for Explosives 
Research and Education, a member of the National Domestic 
Preparedness Consortium, to receive an update on its training 
programs.
    Committee staff attended a briefing held by member 
universities in the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium 
on April 29, 2013.
    On July 15, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from 
representatives of FEMA's National Exercise Division on the 
National Exercise Program.
    Committee staff visited Texas A&M University on August 14 
and 15, 2013 to observe homeland security and emergency 
management training programs at the Texas Engineering Extension 
Service and learn about other homeland security programs 
conducted by Texas A&M. The visit included a tour of Disaster 
City.
    On November 1, 2013, Committee staff visited the Maryland 
Fire Rescue Institute to observe and participate in firefighter 
training and response activities.

                        CYBER INCIDENT RESPONSE

    A cyber attack on critical infrastructure could have 
damaging cascading physical effects, and as such, state and 
local emergency management officials must be prepared to 
respond. While gains in cyber incident response capabilities 
have been made, the 2013 National Preparedness Report again 
highlights States' concerns about their cybersecurity 
capabilities. It is vital that the Federal Government share 
information with emergency response providers about the cyber 
threat so they are prepared to respond.
    On April 25, 2013, Committee staff attended a workshop held 
by CNA on cyberpreparedness.
    On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, 
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and 
Communications held a joint classified Member tour and briefing 
at the Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity 
and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC).
    Committee staff attended a briefing held by the National 
Governors Association's Resource Center for State Cybersecurity 
on September 26, 2013 on the release of its report, Act and 
Adjust: A Call to Action for Governors for Cybersecurity.
    On October 30, 2013, the Subcommittee on Emergency 
Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the Subcommittee 
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
Technologies held a joint hearing entitled ``Cyber Incident 
Response: Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. 
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary, 
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National Protection 
and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 
Mr. Charley English, Director, Georgia Emergency Management 
Agency, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency 
Management Association; Mr. Craig Orgeron, Chief Information 
Officer and Executive Director, Department of Information 
Technology Services, State of Mississippi, testifying on behalf 
of the National Association of State Chief Information 
Officers; Mr. Mike Sena, Deputy Director, Northern California 
Regional Intelligence Center, testifying on behalf of the 
National Fusion Center Association; and Mr. Paul Molitor, 
Assistant Vice President, National Electrical Manufacturers 
Association. This hearing examined the extent of cyber threat 
information sharing and response capabilities to a cyber 
incident with physical consequences.
    In preparation for this hearing, Committee staff met with 
stakeholders to discuss information sharing related to cyber 
threats and cyber incident response capabilities. On September 
18, 2013, Committee staff also received a briefing from 
representatives of the Department of Homeland Security's Office 
of Cybersecurity and Communications on the Department's efforts 
to share cyber threat information with emergency response 
providers.

                  DEFENSE SUPPORT TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES

    In times of emergency, Federal, State, and local civilian 
response agencies can greatly benefit from the experience and 
capabilities of the United States Military, be it active duty, 
National Guard, or reserve forces. It is vital that civilian 
agencies are aware of and can leverage the support that the 
military is willing and able to provide.
    Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of 
Defense on April 2, 2013, regarding the use of the Defense 
Production Act (Pub. L. 81-774) for disaster response 
activities.
    On October 3, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing 
from representatives of the National Governors Association 
regarding the issue of dual status command.
    Committee staff attended a briefing with the United States 
Army Reserve on November 20, 2013 to discuss the role of the 
military in disaster response and the military's response to 
Superstorm Sandy.

  MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

    Efficient and effective management of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency (FEMA) is vital to ensuring its ability to 
meet its mission. Without the successful execution of 
management and operations, the Agency will not be able to 
fulfill its mission.
    On April 8, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from 
representatives from FEMA on its Qualification System and other 
workforce initiatives.
    Committee staff met with representatives of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency on April 12, 2013 to receive a 
briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2014 budget request for 
FEMA.
    On November 21, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of FEMA's Mission Support Bureau to receive a 
briefing on the Bureau's functions and operations.
    Committee staff met with representatives of FEMA's Office 
of the Chief Human Capital Officer on December 6, 2013, to 
receive a briefing on issues related to hiring, training, 
performance management, and employee morale.

                              ----------                              


                       Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Homeland Security Grants: Measuring Our Investments'' March 
        19, 2013. (Serial No. 113-6)
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are 
        Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery 
        #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.'' June 4, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-20)
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are 
        Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery 
        #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.'' July 9, 2013. (Serial 
        No. 113-20)
``Assessing Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty 
        Event.'' Field hearing in Carmel, Indiana, August 6, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-31)
``Assessing the Nation's State of Preparedness: A Federal, 
        State, and Local Perspective.'' September 19, 2013. 
        (Serial No. 113-35)
``Cyber Incident Response: Bridging the Gap Between 
        Cybersecurity and Emergency Management.''Joint hearing 
        with the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure 
        Protection, and Security Technologies. October 30, 
        2013. (Serial No. 113-39)
  Oversight Plan of the Committee on Homeland Security for the 113th 
                                Congress

    Clause 2(d), Rule X of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives for the 113th Congress requires each standing 
Committee to adopt an oversight plan for the two-year period of 
the Congress and to submit the plan to the Committees on 
Oversight and Government Reform and House Administration not 
later than February 15th of the first session of the Congress.
    Rule XI, clause 1(2)(d)(1) requires each Committee to 
submit to the House of Representatives not later than January 
2, of each odd-numbered year, a report on the activities of 
that committee under Rule X and Rule XI during the Congress 
ending on January 3 of such year. Clause 1(2)(d)(3) of Rule XI 
also requires that such report include a summary of the action 
taken and recommendations made with respect to each such plan; 
and a summary of any additional oversight activities undertaken 
by the Committee, and any recommendations made or actions taken 
thereon.
    Part A of this section contains the Committee on Homeland 
Security Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress which the Full 
Committee considered and adopted by unanimous consent on 
January 23, 2013, a quorum being present.
    Part B of this section contains a summary of the actions 
taken by the Committee on Homeland Security to implement the 
Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress and the recommendations 
made with respect to this plan. Part B also contains a summary 
of the additional oversight activities undertaken by the 
Committee, and the recommendations made or actions taken 
thereon.

         PART A--COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY OVERSIGHT PLAN

    This is the oversight plan for the Committee on Homeland 
Security for the 113th Congress. It includes the areas in which 
the Committee expects to conduct oversight during the 113th 
Congress, but does not preclude oversight or investigation of 
additional matters as needs arise. The Full Committee will 
examine the following four key priorities, among other issues.

             PREVENTING A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE HOMELAND

    Our enemies continuously plot to harm Americans. As we saw 
warning signs prior to the 9/11 attacks including the bombings 
of our embassies in Africa and attack on the USS Cole, we are 
experiencing events today, which should cause concern. The Arab 
spring has brought some welcome changes to the Middle East. 
However, the region has also witnessed some dangerous warning 
signs, such as the assassination of our US Ambassador in 
Benghazi along with three other Americans. We now see radical 
and dangerous groups achieving political prominence in the 
Middle East. This is a dangerous time for our nation and we 
cannot become complacent about the threats against us.
    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
persisting threats to Americans and American interests from Al 
Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and new and emerging 
threats such as Iran and Hezbollah in the Western hemisphere. 
The Committee will assess the various vulnerabilities of our 
nation's systems and mechanisms that dangerous people and 
entities aspire to exploit, such as our aviation and other 
transit systems, our cyber networks, and critical 
infrastructure control systems. The Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) has the responsibility to protect Americans from 
these dangers and the Committee intends to examine the 
Department's relevant strategies and capabilities.
    The Committee will also continue to evaluate the Obama 
Administration's policy concerning the Detention Center at the 
US Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This oversight will 
include a review of the Secretary of Homeland Security's role 
as a member of the President's Guantanamo Detention Task Force, 
as outlined in Executive Order 13492. Furthermore, the 
examination will include a review of the potential risk of 
holding high-value detainees, such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 
and other co-conspirators of the attacks of September 11th on 
domestic soil; the risk of inadvertent disclosure of sensitive 
information during the trial; and the recommendations delivered 
by the Department as part of the Guantanamo Review Task Force.

                          securing our borders

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to 
examine the Department's efforts to secure land and maritime 
borders of the United States. The Committee will assess 
programs and technologies used to secure U.S. land borders on 
the north and the south, as well as the Caribbean region. The 
Committee will also examine how the Department is leveraging 
defense technologies to effectively secure the borders and how 
best to utilize equipment coming re-deployed from Iraq and 
Afghanistan. The Committee will continue to monitor the threat 
of spill-over violence stemming from the rise of drug cartels 
and the violent conflict throughout Mexico.

                    protecting against cyber attacks

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
Department's role in hardening our national critical 
infrastructure against cyber attacks by fortifying Federal and 
civilian networks and collaborating with the private sector to 
reduce vulnerabilities. The Committee will review the 
integration of the various cyber missions carried out across 
the Federal government and will monitor the Department's role 
in fulfilling its goals in order to prevent a catastrophic 
cyber attack. The Committee will ensure that the Department 
facilitates the improved security of our Nation's critical 
infrastructure while earning and building on the trust of the 
owners and operators of that infrastructure.

              managing dhs with a business-model approach

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will oversee the 
Department of Homeland Security's management and operations to 
ensure that it is functioning in the most efficient manner 
possible and accountable to the American people. The Committee 
will work to identify potential opportunities to leverage 
proven private sector best practices, find efficiencies that 
will contribute to the Department's ability to meet its vital 
missions, and identify areas for cost savings. The Committee 
intends to conduct oversight and ensure better business 
practices in areas, such as acquisition, financial management, 
information technology, and employee morale.

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                            counterterrorism

    The security of the American homeland is linked to 
international security as vulnerabilities in one part of the 
world can quickly become security threats in another. During 
the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the Department's 
international counterterrorism activities. This review will 
include examining the roles, responsibilities, and resources 
devoted by the Department and its components to achieving 
United States goals to combat terrorism overseas.
    The Committee will examine the counterterrorism policies of 
the US government, with a focus on the Department of Homeland 
Security. This examination will include an assessment of the 
worldwide threat against the US homeland from various groups, 
such as Al Qaeda core, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula 
(AQAP), Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), al Shahbab, 
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Boko 
Haram, and other emerging terrorist groups. The Committee will 
also examine Iran's sponsorship of terrorism via its proxies, 
most notably Hezbollah, including expanding ties in the western 
hemisphere. This examination will include the extent to which 
the Department's strategic planning efforts address these 
threats. The Committee will monitor the homeland security 
ramifications of potential military action against the illicit 
Iranian nuclear program and the geopolitical ramifications 
across the Middle East and North Africa. The Committee will 
also monitor issues related to homegrown terrorist threats, 
economic threats, and terrorist travel and financing issues.

                          counterintelligence

    Throughout the 113th Congress, the Committee will track the 
development of the Department of Homeland Security 
Counterintelligence Program, to ensure it is fully meeting the 
Department's needs. DHS's counterintelligence efforts are 
intended to prevent adversaries from penetrating the Department 
to exploit sensitive information, operations, programs, 
personnel, and resources.

                  unconventional and emerging threats

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
capabilities and efforts of the Department to identify, 
prevent, deter, and respond to emerging future threats. For 
example, GPS navigation systems have a significant impact on 
the daily lives of most Americans but these systems are highly 
susceptible to being jammed and hijacked. These threats could 
disrupt civil aviation and emergency communications, attack 
global financial exchanges, and corrupt the energy grid. The 
Committee will monitor the extent to which the Department 
effectively coordinates and collaborates with other relevant US 
agencies to mitigate these threats to the homeland.

               homeland security intelligence enterprise

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will conduct 
oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's Intelligence 
Enterprise, including intelligence activities throughout the 
Department and component agencies. This will include a focus on 
the coordination and collaboration across intelligence offices 
and personnel within the Headquarters' elements and component 
agencies. Additionally, the Committee will review efforts to 
build the intelligence, analytical, and assessment capabilities 
of the Department and to ensure its full participation in the 
Intelligence Community as part of its homeland security 
mission. This will include an examination of the hiring 
authorities, practices, and career-development of intelligence 
analysts and professionals within Headquarters elements and 
component agencies. The Committee will examine the Department's 
role in managing, distributing, and otherwise using terrorist 
threat information in furtherance of its homeland security 
mission. The Committee will also examine national security 
clearance policies and processes within the Department.

                          information sharing

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
progress being made to improve terrorist and homeland security 
information sharing efforts among Federal, state, and local 
governments, law enforcement entities, first responders, 
emergency management personnel, and the private sector. The 
Committee will examine the Department of Homeland Security's 
efforts to coordinate information sharing efforts from across 
the Federal government to and from state and local fusion 
centers throughout the country. As part of this examination, 
the Committee will review the efficacy and efficiency of state 
and local fusion centers to determine their impact on securing 
the homeland.

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                            border security

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to 
examine the Department's efforts to secure land and maritime 
borders of the United States, including but not limited to 
personnel, technology, infrastructure, and coordination. The 
Committee will also assess the status of programs and 
international agreements to secure US land borders on the north 
and the south, as well as the Caribbean region, from illegal 
entry by persons or contraband. The Committee will monitor the 
extent to which the Department can measure its performance in 
securing the borders and how these measures reflect the state 
of border security.
    The Committee will also examine the technologies used to 
secure the borders. Specifically, the Committee will conduct 
oversight of the Department's acquisitions of border 
technologies, such as those used in the Arizona Border 
Surveillance Technology Plan, and examine the extent to which 
the Department is leveraging defense technologies, such as 
unmanned aerial systems, to effectively secure the borders. 
This oversight will also include the Department's use of aerial 
assets in support of border security. The Committee will 
continue to monitor the threat of spill-over violence stemming 
from the rise of drug cartels and the violent conflict 
throughout Mexico. The Committee will also examine the 
Department's efforts to identify, detain, prioritize, and 
remove criminal aliens from the United States, including those 
apprehended at or near US borders and ports of entry who are 
subject to deportation, particularly those from special 
interest countries.

                 border screening and terrorist travel

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee intends to review 
efforts to ensure the deployment and implementation of training 
and infrastructure enhancements to assist border and consular 
officials in identifying, intercepting, and disrupting 
terrorists or others who would do our Nation harm and who are 
attempting to enter or travel within the United States. The 
Committee will address security-related deficiencies in the 
immigration and naturalization process that terrorists could 
use to gain entry to or remain in the country for illegitimate 
purposes. These weaknesses have and will continue to be 
exploited by terrorists and those seeking to commit terrorist 
acts. The Committee intends to continue to explore challenges 
associated with visa security.
    The Committee will also examine the integration, security, 
and reliability of criminal, immigration, and terrorist 
databases used to screen persons seeking to enter and exit this 
country, to include advanced passenger information and the 
United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology 
(US-VISIT) program. The Committee will also assess the 
development of secure travel documents. In addition, the 
Committee will examine the integration and effectiveness of 
transportation and border security screening systems at ports 
of entry for detecting high-risk passengers and cargo 
transported within the United States and across our borders, 
including efforts to better facilitate travel and trade such as 
implementation of ``trusted traveler'' programs and the Beyond 
the Border Agreement. The Committee will also examine the 
Department's security efforts between ports of entry and the 
extent to which it collaborates with other federal, state, and 
local agencies regarding border security.

                       port and maritime security

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine various 
aspects of port and maritime security, including the security 
of port facilities; the screening of vessels, passengers, 
cargo, and crew for potential terrorists, terrorist weapons, 
and contraband; nuclear detection efforts; the development of 
international security standards for shipping and containers; 
and the implementation and operation, including technology 
utilized, of the Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential. The Committee also plans to review how the 
Department manages risk emerging from maritime threats and 
vulnerabilities such as small boats and semi-submersible 
submarines.
    The Committee plans to review the efficiency and 
effectiveness of the Department's supply chain security 
programs, such as the Customs Trade Partnership Against 
Terrorism (C-TPAT) and the Container Security Initiative (CSI), 
to ensure a proper balance between the facilitation of lawful 
trade and the security of the homeland. This will include an 
assessment of implementation of the Maritime and Transportation 
Security Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-295), the Security and 
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-
347), relevant provisions of the Intelligence Reform and 
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-458), and the 
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 
(P.L. 110-53).

                            u.s. coast guard

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee plans to review 
the Coast Guard's homeland security missions, to include ports, 
waterways, and coastal security; drug interdiction; migrant 
interdiction; law enforcement; and defense readiness. The 
Committee will examine Coast Guard afloat, aviation, and shore-
based operations in support of these missions to ensure that 
the service is using a risk-based, layered strategy to enforce 
laws and keep America's waters secure. This will include a 
specific assessment of the Coast Guard's anti-terrorist 
capabilities, most notably those found within the Deployable 
Operations Group and its units, including Maritime Safety and 
Security Teams, Port Security Units, Tactical Law Enforcement 
Teams, and the Maritime Security Response Team.
    The Committee will monitor the Coast Guard's efforts to 
address threats from small vessels, issues from offshore oil 
rigs, and essential vulnerable vessels such as tankers. 
Additionally, the Committee will review resource and asset 
needs within the Coast Guard to determine whether the service 
is operationally ready to address threats and emergencies while 
pursuing a long-term sustainable path of fleet 
recapitalization. The Committee will specifically examine the 
progress, efficiency, and efficacy of acquisitions programs to 
ensure major procurements remain on schedule without a 
reduction in readiness throughout the service.
    Furthermore, the Committee will investigate the Coast 
Guard's specific maritime security operations and initiatives, 
such as the International Port Security Program and the 
inspection of vessels originating from ports with inadequate 
anti-terrorism measures. The Committee will examine these and 
other programs to ensure that the service is developing a full 
sense of maritime domain awareness and executing all of its 
missions in the most effective manner possible to keep America 
secure.

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                           aviation security

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the risks 
to the aviation system, as well as the development and 
implementation of security measures to reduce or mitigate such 
risks. The Committee's oversight will review programs and 
procedures implemented by the Department of Homeland Security 
related to the security of all types of aircraft, including 
commercial passenger, air cargo, and general aviation aircraft. 
In addition, the Committee will examine airport perimeter and 
access controls and technology for limiting access to the 
secure areas of commercial and general aviation airports. The 
Committee will also examine the training and management of the 
Federal Air Marshal Service.
    In addition, the Committee will examine the Department's 
global strategy for securing the aviation system including its 
cooperation with foreign countries on security procedures and 
technologies and the harmonization of aviation security 
standards worldwide. The Committee will identify international 
best practices to aviation security that could result in 
efficiencies in the United States. The Committee also remains 
concerned about weaknesses in the Alien Flight Student program 
and will continue to monitor the Department's progress in 
correcting these weaknesses. The Committee will continue to 
pursue options for strengthening the security process for US 
citizens enrolled in flight training.

                    passenger and baggage screening

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review TSA's 
deployment of technology and implementation of procedures 
related to the screening of passengers in all modes of 
transportation and will examine TSA's balancing security 
interests with the need for the efficient flow of travel, 
including privacy and civil liberties safeguards. The Committee 
will conduct oversight on the cost and effectiveness of 
technology related to the screening of baggage; transportation 
security information sharing within the Federal interagency 
process; and the effectiveness of the credentialing process. 
The Committee will also review TSA's passenger search policies 
and pre-screening programs, including the screening of 
passengers against no-fly and selectee lists, the performance 
of the Secure Flight program, and other measures that affect 
the security of domestic and international air travelers.

                   reforming transportation security

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine 
additional options for the Department to allow the private 
sector more flexibility to innovate transportation security 
including the Screening Partnership Program. The Committee will 
explore the costs and benefits of these options. The Committee 
will continue to examine the extent to which a risk-based 
security approach can increase efficiencies in the TSA 
workforce without compromising security. This examination will 
include the effectiveness of the Department's outreach to the 
public on its transportation security measures. The Committee 
will also monitor the progress of the Department to implement 
risk-based screening initiatives, such as TSA's Pre-Check 
program, at airports nationwide to increase efficiencies in the 
screening process. This includes assessing the effectiveness of 
these initiatives.
    The Committee will review the Department's acquisition and 
procurement policies, practices, and procedures for screening 
technologies to ensure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars. 
The Committee will continue to seek input from independent 
groups outside the Department to help ensure a leaner, smarter, 
more efficient organization. In addition, the Committee will 
monitor the extent to which the Department enlists the private 
sector to modernize and, to the extent feasible, automate the 
passenger screening process to reduce invasive pat-downs; 
implements privacy software on all Advanced Imaging Technology 
machines; sponsors an independent analysis of the potential 
health impacts of AIT machines; and further validates the 
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques program and 
assesses the value added to aviation security.

                         surface transportation

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the 
Transportation Security Administration's efforts to secure 
surface transit systems, including the most at-risk mass 
transit systems, buses, subway light rail, and passenger rail, 
freight rail, pipelines, and highway systems. Moreover, in 
examining the security of surface transportation systems, the 
Committee will consider options to improve the efficiency and 
effectiveness of the surface transportation inspection program. 
The Committee will also examine the efficacy and impact of 
Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response teams. The Committee 
will also monitor the extent to which the Department 
effectively coordinates with other Federal partners, such as 
the Department of Transportation, the Federal Rail 
Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration to 
secure our nation's transportation systems. The Committee will 
continue to monitor the implementation of the Transportation 
Worker Identification Credential and its impact on those 
required to obtain the credential.

                  transportation security regulations

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine 
transportation security regulations in order to reduce the 
burden on the economy and improve American global 
competitiveness. The Committee will examine the challenges to 
finalize guidance related to foreign-aircraft repair-station 
security. The Committee will continue to seek perspectives from 
the private sector on the impact of transportation security 
regulations and options for the Department to become more 
efficient and effective.

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                       preparedness and response

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
Administration's efforts to implement Presidential Policy 
Directive 8 (PPD-8), and the required National Preparedness 
System, which includes the various frameworks and the National 
Preparedness Goal. Additionally, the Committee will review the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) response and 
recovery efforts for declared disasters to ensure capabilities 
are enhanced by lessons learned and Federal resources are used 
appropriately. The Committee will investigate issues, if any, 
of waste, fraud, and abuse associated with FEMA's disaster 
response efforts.

     assistance to state and local governments and first responders

    Throughout the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine 
FEMA's allocation and administration of grants to enhance the 
ability of state and local governments and emergency response 
providers to prevent, prepare for, respond to, mitigate, and 
recover from a terrorist attack, including proposals for 
reforms to these programs. The Committee will review the 
coordination of grant programs across the Federal government; 
coordination within the Department of Homeland Security in 
developing guidance and administering grants; the ability of 
state and local governments to access, obligate, and expend 
funds; strength of regional partnerships developed through 
grants; and the risk-based distribution and expenditure of such 
grants at the state and local levels. The Committee will 
examine options to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of 
grant programs. The Committee will also review ongoing efforts 
to comprehensively assess these investments and the impact on 
preparedness capabilities through the lens of the National 
Preparedness Goal, National Preparedness Report, State 
Preparedness Reports, and other related measures.

chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear planning, preparedness, 
                              and response

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
significant challenges posed by chemical, biological, 
radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons to homeland security 
and assess the Department's progress in implementing security 
strategies including prevention, preparedness, and response 
approaches that utilize multiple tools and policies to reduce 
the likelihood and impact of CBRN attacks and, thus, the CBRN 
risk to the Nation. The Committee will oversee the Department's 
efforts to predict and respond to the evolving CBRN threat 
landscape, and ensure that CBRN expenditures are risk-based, 
coordinated, and in general represent wise use of taxpayer 
dollars. The Committee will examine the Department's capability 
to mitigate CBRN risks through appropriate means including 
detection of, preparedness for, and response to CBRN threats. 
The Committee will continue its oversight of those activities 
needed to ensure the safety of the public and the first 
responder community in the event of an attack, such as through 
the development of medical countermeasures programs. The 
Committee will also oversee preparedness for agricultural 
terrorism events.

                             communications

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
coordination of the various communications programs and offices 
within the Department of Homeland Security. The Committee will 
monitor activities of the First Responder Network Authority 
(FirstNet) and the development of the public safety 
interoperable wireless broadband network. In addition, the 
Committee will review the Department's programs in the 
establishment of the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System 
to ensure timely and effective alerts and warnings are provided 
to the public in the event of an emergency.

                  emergency response provider training

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the 
Department's terrorism preparedness training programs, 
including awareness of these resources among first responders 
and state and local governments and the level of coordination 
among Federal, state, and local training programs. The 
Committee will also review existing training centers and 
determine whether the Department is optimally utilizing these 
facilities to enhance first responder terrorism preparedness.

                       exercises and simulations

    The Committee will examine the Department's efforts to 
streamline and improve the National Exercise Program to ensure 
the program enhances the preparedness of the Nation. The 
Committee will monitor the extent to which FEMA is 
incorporating lessons learned from national exercises into 
future training, planning, and response, recovery, and 
mitigation activities.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                             cybersecurity

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
Department's role in hardening our national critical 
infrastructure against cyber attacks by fortifying Federal 
civilian networks and collaborating with the private sector to 
develop the means to detect and prevent cyber attacks, reduce 
vulnerabilities, provide incident response, and facilitate 
recovery. That oversight will consider the Department's ability 
to detect the incursion of malicious activity; attribute the 
source of that activity; and promote best practices, risk 
assessments, and sharing of threat information across all 
levels of government and the private sector.
    The Department has been delegated authority by the White 
House to develop cybersecurity policy across the civilian 
government agencies. The Committee will monitor that this 
policy is effective, efficient and scalable to ensure the 
security of government networks. In addition, the Committee 
will examine the Department's ability to foster research and 
development cybersecurity technology as well as developing a 
substantial and capable professional cybersecurity workforce. 
The Department has recently reorganized the offices tasked with 
carrying out its cybersecurity mission so the Committee will 
review the efficiencies in these offices to make sure that the 
bureaucracy enables, and doesn't hinder, the mission. The 
Committee will also examine the resiliency of national critical 
infrastructure to withstand cyber attacks and the need to 
optimize supply chain risk management in order to protect 
against manipulation without unnecessarily impeding commerce.
    The Committee will also review the integration of the 
various cyber missions carried out across the Federal 
government, including its collaboration with the defense and 
intelligence agencies. Similarly the Committee will monitor the 
Department's role in fulfilling the goals of the Homeland 
Security blueprint for cybersecurity, as well as the 
development and the implementation of the National Cyber 
Incident Response Plan, which expands upon the National 
Response Framework. The Committee will ensure that the 
Department facilitates the improved security of our Nation's 
critical infrastructure while earning and building on the trust 
of the owners and operators of that infrastructure.

                   critical infrastructure protection

    Pursuant to Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7 
(HSPD-7), the Department is responsible for integrating sector 
specific strategies into a National Strategy for Critical 
Infrastructure Protection, and for coordinating Federal efforts 
across all such infrastructure sectors. During the 113th 
Congress, Committee oversight will focus on the Department's 
national coordination responsibilities and its sector specific 
critical infrastructure protection responsibilities. The 
Committee will also examine the Department's efforts to assess 
national critical infrastructure priorities.
    In addition, the Committee will review the Department's 
progress in identifying, prioritizing, recommending, and 
implementing protective measures to reduce vulnerabilities for 
critical infrastructure and key resources, including its 
administration of programs to promote private sector sharing of 
critical infrastructure threat and vulnerability-related 
information, and its administration of systems and programs to 
provide timely warnings of potential risks to critical 
infrastructure.

                       chemical facility security

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to 
review the Department's efforts to secure chemical facilities 
and take action, as appropriate, to optimally balance the 
program's effectiveness in reducing risk posed by certain 
chemical facilities and the everyday demands for chemicals in 
commerce. The Committee will review the management challenges 
associated with the Department's related chemical facility 
security program and the progress in increasing its efficiency 
and effectiveness.

                         science and technology

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will oversee the 
capability of the Department's Science & Technology Directorate 
to rapidly develop and deliver products and technology 
solutions to its customers, including the operating components 
of the Department, and state and local emergency responders and 
officials, to help them secure the homeland by preventing, 
protecting against, and responding to terrorist threats and 
natural disasters. The Committee will examine, in particular, 
the Department's progress in developing a more rigorous process 
to identify, prioritize, and fund research, development, 
testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) opportunities that balances 
risk to the homeland with cost, impact, and time to deliver.
    The Committee will review the Department's efforts to 
coordinate the homeland security research and development 
agenda and leverage scientific knowledge and technical 
expertise, research, and facilities at relevant universities, 
research institutions, government and national laboratories, 
and the private sector, including the Homeland Security Centers 
of Excellence and Federally Funded Research and Development 
Centers. The Committee will also assess the status of the 
Department's technical infrastructure and workforce to ensure 
current and future homeland security RDT&E needs will be met. 
The Committee will review the Department's activities relating 
to evaluation, testing, and certification of private sector 
homeland security technologies.
    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will also continue 
to review the Directorate's implementation of the Support Anti-
terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act (the SAFETY 
Act), to determine its impact on homeland security and 
facilitation of jobs in the private sector.

 technology to counter chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear 
                                threats

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
Department's progress in improving the Nation's capability to 
counter the threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological, 
radiological, and nuclear weapons in the United States through 
multi-layered approaches at the Federal, state, and local 
levels. The Committee will review the Department's chemical, 
biological, radiological, and nuclear analysis capabilities and 
information sharing mechanisms to provide actionable 
information and an integrated operating system to guide 
decision makers in carrying out appropriate responses, 
including interdiction.
    To enhance the ability to interdict chemical, biological, 
radiological, and nuclear smuggling across US borders (land, 
air, and sea), the Committee will oversee the Department's 
progress in employing risk-based methods for developing, 
testing, certifying, deploying, and operating current and next 
generation chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear 
detection equipment. The Committee will also examine the 
Department's ability to detect chemical, biological, 
radiological, and nuclear materials in the interior of the 
United States and the Department's coordination with state and 
local partners to reduce the risk of these threats. Finally, 
the Committee will examine the Department's chemical, 
biological, radiological, and nuclear forensic activities to 
support national priorities for deterrence, attribution, and 
prosecution.

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

    departmental efficiency and waste, fraud, abuse, and duplication

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will oversee the 
Department of Homeland Security's day-to-day operations to 
ensure that it is operating in the most efficient and effective 
manner possible. Pursuant to Rule X, clause 2(d)(F) of the 
Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee will work 
to identify potential opportunities to eliminate duplicative or 
unnecessary programs, find efficiencies that will contribute to 
the Department's ability to meet its vital missions, and 
identify areas for cost savings. The Committee will also 
conduct rigorous oversight to ensure departmental regulations 
enhance security without posing an unnecessary barrier to 
private sector job creation. The Committee will investigate 
homeland security programs and practices, as warranted. For 
example, the Committee will continue to monitor the safety and 
security of Federal buildings and facilities, including the 
role and effectiveness of the Federal Protective Service. The 
Committee's oversight will include monitoring the extent to 
which the Department is responsive to the Committee's requests.

                         acquisition management

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the 
efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to improve 
acquisition outcomes, and to ensure that effective management 
controls are put in place to prevent contract waste, fraud, and 
abuse while promoting efficiency and effectiveness. The 
Committee will review the authorities and activities of the 
Undersecretary for Management and Chief Procurement Officer to 
ensure the effective management of these key functions. The 
Committee will monitor the cost, schedule, and performance 
status of major Department acquisition programs. The Committee 
will also examine the impact of the Department's acquisition 
initiatives to enhance processes and improve outcomes related 
to its major acquisition programs.
    The Committee also will review the Department's 
implementation of Section 831(a) of the Homeland Security Act 
of 2002, which grants the Secretary authority with respect to 
research and development projects to use more flexible 
contracting mechanisms in an effort to attract ``nontraditional 
government contractors'' for needed homeland security 
technologies, as well as the Secretary's use of other 
streamlined acquisition practices. The Committee will continue 
to monitor the Department's efforts to leverage strategic 
sourcing, as outlined in Federal guidance, to increase 
efficiencies.

                          financial management

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue its 
oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's progress to 
properly manage financial systems and data to minimize 
inefficient and wasteful spending, make more informed decisions 
to manage its programs and implement Department policies. The 
Committee will also review the Department's efforts to enhance 
its managerial cost accounting, address internal control 
weaknesses in financial reporting, achieve a clean audit 
opinion on its financial statements, and reduce the reliance on 
manual data calls to collect cost information from the various 
components and compile consolidated, reliable data.

                   information technology management

    During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the 
Department's efforts to address information technology (IT) 
challenges, including the management and integration of the 
Department's IT systems. The Committee will review the 
authorities and activities of the Chief Information Officer 
(CIO) and component CIOs to ensure the effective management and 
coordination of these key functions. The Committee will also 
monitor the Department's progress in IT architectural planning, 
investment management, cloud computing, policy development, 
operations, and related personnel management.

                         departmental workforce

    Throughout the 113th Congress, the Committee will monitor 
the Department's efforts to recruit and retain personnel and to 
address employee concerns set forth in the Office of Personnel 
Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the Department's 
own personnel surveys, which have indicated morale problems 
across the Department. In addition, the Committee will continue 
to examine the Department's Balanced Workforce Initiative, 
which seeks to convert contractor positions into Federal 
positions, to ensure an appropriate balance is struck between 
Federal employees and private contracts and guard against any 
unnecessary elimination of private sector jobs.
    The Committee will continue to monitor the Department's 
efforts to effectively and efficiently consolidate its 
headquarters from more than 40 locations throughout the 
National Capital Region, known as the St. Elizabeth's 
Headquarters Consolidation Project.

                           employee integrity

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine employee 
corruption and misconduct issues and their effect on homeland 
security. Although the vast majority of Department employees 
reflect the agency's core values, even one corrupt employee 
represents a significant management challenge. The Committee 
will review Department statistics and case studies associated 
with employee integrity issues, as well as, the effectiveness 
of policies, procedures, and practices the Department utilizes 
to address such issues.

                      united states secret service

    In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the 
homeland security operations of the United States Secret 
Service, including its critical role of protecting the 
President of the United States, among other duties. The 
Committee will also monitor issues related to employee 
integrity.

                      privacy and civil liberties

    Section 222 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (the Act) 
created a Privacy Officer for the Department of Homeland 
Security to ensure that the Department's information gathering 
and analysis functions and other programs across its components 
adhere to established standards for the protection of privacy. 
Section 705 of the Act also established an Officer for Civil 
Rights and Liberties to review and assess information alleging 
abuses of civil rights or civil liberties by employees and 
officials of the Department of Homeland Security. During the 
113th Congress, the Committee will continue to monitor the 
Department's efforts under such laws to strike an appropriate 
balance between the need to combat terrorist attacks against 
the United States with the privacy expectations and civil 
rights of US citizens. For example, the Committee will continue 
to monitor the Department's role in oversight of the domestic 
use of unmanned aerial systems.
PART B--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY OVERSIGHT 
                      PLAN FOR THE 113TH CONGRESS

    Part B of this section contains a summary of the actions 
taken by the Committee on Homeland Security to implement the 
Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress and the recommendations 
made with respect to this plan. Part B also contains a summary 
of the additional oversight activities undertaken by the 
Committee, and the recommendations made or actions taken 
thereon.

             PREVENTING A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE HOMELAND

    During the first session of the 113th Congress, the 
Committee continued its focus on the security of the United 
States Homeland. On April 15, the landscape of American 
security was greatly impacted when two American persons who 
used improvised explosive devices (IED), killed three people 
and injured approximately 260 others at the finish line of the 
Boston Marathon. Since this attack, the Committee has been 
working on a report on the events that led to the attack as 
well as recommendations for how the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) and other U.S. Governmental agencies can make 
adjustments to their operating procedures to reduce the 
likelihood this atrocity could be repeated. The Committee held 
two hearings on the Boston Marathon Bombing, one on May 23 and 
the other on July 10, sent Committee staff to Moscow, Russia, 
and twice to Boston, Massachusetts to obtain additional details 
on the bombing and the suspects. The Committee expects a 
report, one classified and one open version to be released in 
early 2014.
    This major national security event continued to drive the 
Committee to conduct preemptive oversight of other major 
Homeland security events and issues. In August 2013, the 
Committee conducted oversight after al-Qaeda-linked threat to 
United States' interests throughout the Middle East and North 
Africa. During this threat, Committee staff met with Government 
officials and private sector experts on al-Qaeda's growing 
spider web of affiliates and the threat they pose to the 
Homeland. This continued into September when the Committee, 
raised awareness of the growing level of al-Qaeda and Islamist 
extremists in the Syrian conflict. The Committee conducted a 
hearing on the subject entitled ``Crisis in Syria: Implications 
on the Homeland'' on September 10, 2013. This hearing affected 
the national debate of the Syrian conflict and its impact on 
homeland security.
    During the Committee's investigation into the Syrian 
conflict, the Committee became increasing concerned, as Syria 
was the world's third largest holder of chemical weapons. As 
parts of Syria fell to the opposition, the Committee, working 
with DHS and intelligence organizations, as well as private 
companies, raised the National debate on the affects of 
chemical weapons falling into the growing hands of Islamist 
extremists. The Committee held classified meetings with DHS, 
FBI, and Intelligence Community members to discuss this issue 
and raise awareness. The Committee held meetings and attended 
meetings with government officials from intelligence 
organizations from August to November 20, 2013 on issues 
related to Syria that have the potential to affect the 
Homeland. The Committee is continuing to monitor the impact 
from this crisis.
    International tragedy continued in September when al-
Shabaab, a Somali based al-Qaeda linked terrorist organization 
attacked a mall in Kenya. The soft target or Mumbai-style 
attack was quickly recognized by the Committee as having 
implications on the Homeland and a hearing was held on October 
9, entitled ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How Westerners 
Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the Homeland.'' Experts 
from private industry attended speaking of the threat to the 
Homeland and Sheriff Stanek from Minneapolis area of Minnesota 
spoke as a senior law enforcement official dealing with 
citizens who have participated in al-Shabaab.
    The Committee continued to investigate and push the 
Administration on the Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) 
designation for Western Africa (Nigeria) terrorist group, Boko 
Haram. The Committee issued letters to the Secretary of State 
on 13 and 30 September urging the Department to rethink its 
stance on the terrorist organization and issued an update to 
the Committee's report from the 112th Congress on Boko Haram. 
On November 13 2013, the Department of State issued the FTO 
designation making it more difficult for Boko Haram to obtain 
support. The Committee, during the 113th Congress, will 
continue to move the Administration to isolate terrorist 
organizations such as al-Shabaab and Boko Haram, in order to 
better safeguard the homeland.
    Designating these groups as FTOs provides the Federal 
Government with additional tools to fight terrorism and to 
protect the Homeland, something this Committee has continued to 
do in the First Session of this Congress. Ensuring information 
sharing from the highest levels to the lowest has been a 
priority, and another key to preventing attacks on the 
Homeland. On July 26, 2013, the Committee issued its year long 
investigative report on the National Network of Fusion Centers, 
the hub of information sharing for State and Local law 
enforcement and emergency management. The Committee's 
evaluation found that while the Network of fusion centers is a 
vital part of our Nation's counterterrorism efforts, it is not 
currently functioning at its full potential. The Committee will 
continue to monitor the progress of the Fusion Centers to 
ensure that they continue to improve and add to the national 
collection, analysis and sharing of critical information that 
will protect the Homeland.
    In the beginning of 2014, the Olympic Games will be held in 
Sochi, Russia, close to the Caucus region. The Caucuses have 
been a hot bed of extremism, and have connections to conflict 
zones throughout the world, as well as the suspects believed 
responsible for the Boson Marathon bombing. In November 2013 
sent staff members to Sochi, as well as neighboring Georgia, to 
further investigate the region and the Islamist extremists 
there. The Committee released a report in late November 
detailing the unclassified portion of the trip and plans to 
continue monitoring these groups as well as the threat they 
pose to the nearly 15,000 American athletes and attendees at 
the Olympic Games.

                          securing our borders

    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Committee examined the Department's efforts to secure the 
Nation's land and maritime borders. As result of this 
oversight, the Committee unanimously approved legislation that 
would require the Department to develop a comprehensive border 
security strategy to gain and maintain situational awareness 
and operational control of the border. The legislation requires 
tangible metrics for the apprehension of illegal border 
crossings and a significant reduction in the movement of 
illegal drugs and contraband.
    From August 3 through 6, 2013, the Committee conducted a 
site visit to the southwest border. The purpose of the site 
visit was to examine current border security conditions, 
including the maritime environment. Members experienced 
witnessed border security operations in the maritime domain, 
urban environment, border security infrastructure, Unmanned 
Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operations, and border security challenges 
in the Rio Grande Valley. In San Diego, Members examined United 
States Coast Guard port security operations, conducted an 
aerial tour of the international border, and examined tactical 
infrastructure and counter tunneling operations. In Tucson, 
Arizona Members toured various facilities including: the Tucson 
Joint Field Command and Predator Operations Center; a 
demonstration of advanced Integrated Fixed Tower technologies, 
in Sasabe; and received an overview of UAV operations at Fort 
Huachuca. Members then traveled to the Rio Grande Valley to 
participate in border terrain tours with local law enforcement, 
receive briefings on the South Texas Campaign, and the Texas 
National Guard on RC-26 fixed-wing aerial detection and 
monitoring operations supporting the Department of Homeland 
Security.
    Throughout the First Session, the Committee has actively 
examined the key elements of border security including the 
definition of a secure border, border security metrics and 
measures, visa security and overstays, the implementation of a 
biometric exit system, cargo security, maritime security, and 
the future of the Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential (TWIC).
    From August 3 through 6, 2013, the Committee conducted a 
site visit to the Southwest border. The purpose of the site 
visit was to examine current border security conditions, 
including the maritime environment. Members witnessed border 
security operations in the maritime domain, urban environment, 
border security infrastructure, UAV operations, and border 
security challenges in the Rio Grande Valley. In San Diego, 
Members examined United States Coast Guard port security 
operations, conducted an aerial tour of the international 
border, and examined tactical infrastructure and counter 
tunneling operations. In Tucson, Arizona Members toured various 
facilities including: the Tucson Joint Field Command and 
Predator Operations Center; a demonstration of advanced 
Integrated Fixed Tower technologies, in Sasabe; and received an 
overview of UAV operations at Fort Huachuca. Members then 
traveled to the Rio Grande Valley to participate in border 
terrain tours with local law enforcement, receive briefings on 
the South Texas Campaign, and the Texas National Guard on 
fixed-wing aerial detection and monitoring operations 
supporting the Department of Homeland Security.
    During the First Session, the Committee received updates on 
the Arizona Technology Plan and successfully pushed for the 
Department of Defense to re-deploy aerostats to DHS for 
assessment in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. The Committee is 
optimistic that Mexican government reforms will provide new 
economic opportunities so that citizens will choose stable, 
viable jobs, especially in the energy industry, instead of 
joining criminal cartels. The Committee will continue to 
recommend to the Department to secure our borders in the north, 
south, and the maritime domain.

                    protecting against cyber attacks

    During the first session of the 113th Congress, the 
Committee met extensively with the Department and various 
stakeholders to examine the Department's role in the hardening 
our national critical infrastructure against cyber attacks by 
fortifying Federal and civilian networks and collaborating with 
the private sector to reduce vulnerabilities.
    The National Infrastructure Protection Plan and Executive 
Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity 
solidified the Department's role as the lead Federal entity in 
protecting domestic critical infrastructure. The Committee held 
numerous briefings to understand the role of the Department in 
implementing the Executive Order. Upon issuance of Executive 
Order 13636 and Presidential Policy Directive--21 on Critical 
Infrastructure Security and Resilience, the Committee received 
briefings from DHS to understand the role of the Department in 
implementing these documents. On March 13, 2013, the Committee 
held a hearing entitled ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and 
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical 
Infrastructure.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. 
Jane Holl Lute, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security; Mr. Anish B. Bhimani, Chairman, Financial Services 
Information Sharing and Analysis Center; Mr. Gary W. Hayes, 
Chief Information Officer, Centerpoint Energy; and Ms. Michelle 
Richardson, Legislative Counsel, American Civil Liberties 
Union.
    As the Nation approached key Affordable Care Act milestones 
during 2013, the Committee raised security and privacy concerns 
prior to problems as healthcare.gov went live in October. The 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and 
Security Technologies held hearings in July and September on 
healthcare.gov and the Health Exchange Data Hub. On November 8, 
Committee staff also received a briefing from the U.S. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Office of 
Cybersecurity and Communications on Department of Homeland 
Security roles in the implementation of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. On November 13, 2013, the Full 
Committee held a hearing entitled ``Cyber Side-Effects: How 
Secure is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed 
Healthcare.gov?'' The Committee received testimony from Ms. 
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary, 
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security; Ms. Soraya Correa, Associate Director, 
Enterprise Services Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. 
Luke Chung, President, FMS, Inc.; and Mr. Waylon Krush, Chief 
Executive Officer, Lunarline, Inc. In preparation for this 
hearing, Committee staff met with stakeholders to discuss 
technical flaws with healthcare.gov.

              managing dhs with a business-model approach

    During the first session of the 113th Congress, the 
Committee has been actively monitoring the Department of 
Homeland Security's (DHS) management and operations to ensure 
that it is functioning more efficiently and is accountable to 
the American people. The Chairman and Ranking Member have 
attended Subcommittee hearings on management issues. The 
Committee met with DHS headquarters and many components to 
examine management practices in acquisition, financial 
management, information technology, human capital, and employee 
integrity.
    Integrated Investment Life Cycle Management (IILCM) is the 
Department's transformational concept to integrate all phases 
of the Department's multi-billion dollar budget and investment/
acquisition management process--more like a business would do. 
The framework provides critical linkages between Strategy, 
Capabilities and Requirements, Programming and Budgeting, and 
Investment Oversight phases to ensure the effective execution 
of federal funds to support strategic priorities. IILCM was 
signed into policy by Secretary Napolitano in February 2013 and 
the framework is being piloted through March 2014 using the 
cybersecurity, biodefense, and common vetting portfolios. On 
November 14, 2013, DHS officials briefed the Committee on their 
approach to IILCM.
    On August 1, 2013, the Undersecretary for Management, the 
Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Information Officer, and other 
senior officials briefed Committee staff on the status of the 
Department's acquisition management efforts. As a follow up, on 
September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and 
Management Efficiency held a hearing entitled ``DHS Acquisition 
Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and 
Private Sector Lessons Learned.'' The Subcommittee received 
testimony from Hon. Rafael Borras, Undersecretary for 
Management, Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Michele 
Mackin, Director, Government Accountability Office; Ms. Anne 
Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of 
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. William 
C. Greenwalt, Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; 
Mr. Stan Soloway, President and CEO, Professional Services 
Council; Mr. David Berteau, Senior Vice President, Center for 
Strategic and International Studies. The purpose of the hearing 
was to examine DHS's acquisition practices to determine if the 
Department is effectively implementing its policies and to 
assess whether DHS could leverage best practices and lessons 
learned from the Defense Department and the private sector.
    In light of the Government Accountability Office's (GAO) 
2013 High-Risk report which identified financial management 
within the Department as high risk, on February 20, 2013, the 
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight 
and Management Efficiency, and the Subcommittee on 
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
Technologies, sent a letter to DHS's Chief Financial Officer 
regarding the Department's financial management systems and 
efforts to obtain a clean audit opinion on its financial 
statements. The Department provided a response to this letter 
on March 8, 2013. On March 11, 2013, Committee staff received a 
briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer. The GAO issued its 
report DHS Financial Management: Additional Efforts Needed to 
Resolve Deficiencies in Internal Controls and Financial 
Management Systems on September 30, 2013, [GAO-13-561]. The 
report contained four recommendations for executive action. On 
July 8, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from DHS's 
Chief Financial Officer regarding DHS's efforts to modernize 
its financial systems. To further examine these issues, on 
November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
Efficiency held a hearing entitled ``DHS Financial Management: 
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.'' The 
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Asif Khan, Director, 
Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office; and Ms. Anne Richards, Assistant 
Inspector General for Audits, Office of Inspector General, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was 
to examine relevant GAO and Inspector General findings on DHS 
financial practices, including steps to obtain a clean audit 
opinion and implement financial management systems.
    The Committee reviewed the authorities and activities of 
the Chief Information Officer (CIO) to ensure the effective 
management and coordination of key IT systems planning, 
investment management, cloud computing, data consolidating, 
operations, policy development, and related personnel 
management. The Committee also examined component CIOs--
particularly Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and United States 
Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS)--and their efforts to 
modernize and implement critical IT systems supporting our 
border agents and immigration officers. On February 21, 2013, 
Committee staff received a briefing from DHS Office of 
Inspector General concerning their ongoing IT Audits and IT 
management issues. Committee staff also received briefings from 
representatives from DHS, including: The DHS Chief Information 
Officer; USCIS, including the USCIS Chief Information Officer; 
CBP; and ICE, including the ICE Chief Information Officer. The 
Committee reviewed the Department's efforts to address 
information technology (IT) challenges, including the 
management and integration of the Department's IT systems. The 
Committee monitored the Department's progress in IT 
architectural planning, investment management, and cloud 
computing. On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS 
Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration 
Laws?'' The purpose of the hearing was to assess how IT 
resources are being effectively utilized to help secure our 
borders and uphold immigration laws and how the Department is 
exercising proper management and oversight of its IT 
investments. The Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee on Oversight & Management Efficiency additionally 
requested on May 23, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing GAO review 
of the TECS modernization program--the Treasury Enforcement 
Communication System. Committee staff also received a briefing 
from the Office of Inspector General regarding its 
investigation related to the DHS Chief Information Officer.
    The Committee has been vocal about the need for key 
Department leadership positions to be filled as vacancies lead 
to ineffective government. On March 5, 2013, the Chairman and 
Ranking Member sent a letter the President urging him to 
swiftly appoint an Inspector General at DHS.

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                            counterterrorism

    During the first session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence examined the 
counterterrorism efforts of the U.S. Government across the 
government to counter the threat from al-Qaeda and other terror 
networks with a focus on the Department of Homeland Security 
(DHS). The Committee conducted a series of meetings, briefings, 
and site visit from DHS and component agencies, the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National Counterterrorism 
Center (NCTC), and the Department of State (DOS).
    Subcommittee Members and staff received classified briefing 
from the above agencies, as well as others, on the threat posed 
by al-Qaeda core and affiliates, as well as the emerging al-
Qaeda threats in Syria, North Africa, and the Sinai. The 
Subcommittee held oversight hearings on the threat to the 
Homeland from Syria and Iran, al-Qaeda in the Arabian 
Peninsula, and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
    The Subcommittee conducted oversight over the Foreign 
Terrorist Organization (FTO) designation process. While DOS 
handles this process, the designation of entities as FTOs has a 
direct impact on homeland security. The Chairs of the Full 
Committee and Subcommittee, along with the Chair of the 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and 
Security Technologies, sent a letter to DOS and issued a report 
urging a FTO designation for Boko Haram.

                          counterintelligence

    The Subcommittee conducted oversight over the programs 
within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) focused on 
detecting insider threats, including counterintelligence, 
polygraph, and security clearance programs. The Subcommittee 
staff met with representatives from the Defense Security 
Service within the Department of Defense, the DHS Office of 
Security, the Customs and Border Protection Internal Affairs 
Office, the Intelligence and Analysis Counterintelligence 
Program, and the Government Accountability Office. The 
Subcommittee held a hearing on insider threats and the security 
clearance process.

                  unconventional and emerging threats

    The Subcommittee held a hearing on U.S. counterterrorism 
efforts to combat a chemical, biological, radiological, and 
nuclear (CBRN) attack. Additionally, Subcommittee staff 
received classified and unclassified briefings on CBRN threats 
from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Bureau 
of Investigations, Sandia National Laboratory, and outside 
entities.

               homeland security intelligence enterprise

    The Subcommittee has had multiple classified and 
unclassified briefings with officials from the Department of 
Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis 
(I&A) to examine the structure, mission, and capability of the 
office, as well as I&As role in coordinating intelligence 
within DHS and State and local law enforcement. Subcommittee 
staff also met with Customs and Border Protection, Immigrations 
and Customs Enforcement, the National Counterterrorism Center, 
the Government Accountability Office, and the Federal Bureau of 
Investigations regarding the network of Joint Terrorism Task 
Forces.

                          information sharing

    Subcommittee Members received classified and unclassified 
briefings on DHS intelligence and information sharing efforts. 
Members received additional briefings on the mission and 
capabilities of the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis. 
Subcommittee Members and staff received threat briefings from 
the Department of Homeland Security and reviewed new 
intelligence products and information sharing efforts. In 
addition, Subcommittee staff met with representatives from the 
National Fusion Center Association, Government Accountability 
Office, and multiple State and local law enforcement 
jurisdictions regarding the quality, quantity, and timeliness 
of information shared between Federal, State, and local law 
enforcement.
    The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the 
Subcommittee released a Majority Staff Report entitled ``The 
National Network of Fusion Centers,'' detailing the Committee's 
findings and recommendations developed from a comprehensive 
study of fusions centers across the country.

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                            border security

    During the First Session of 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security examined the 
Department of Homeland Security's efforts to secure the borders 
of the United States at and between the ports of entry, as well 
as in the maritime domain. The Subcommittee held hearings on 
these border security related topics on February 26, 2013, 
March 20, 2013, and July 23, 2013. The Subcommittee also 
considered H.R. 1417. The Chair and Ranking member of the 
Subcommittee sent letters to the Secretary regarding the 
continuance of the Tethered Aerostat Radar System.
    In 2013 the Subcommittee held several oversight hearings 
regarding border security which dressed personnel, technology, 
infrastructure, coordination and assessed the status of 
programs and agreements to secure U.S. international borders 
from illegal entry by persons or contraband. The first hearing 
was held on February 26, 2013, and was entitled ``What Does a 
Secure Border Look Like?'' The hearing took a holistic look at 
the border and called upon the Department to define what a 
secure border looks like, assess what needs are to achieve a 
secure border and how to measure border security progress.
    The Subcommittee reviewed the available technologies used 
to secure the borders by hosting a briefing from Department of 
Homeland Security Officials on the state of border security on 
March 13, 2013. The purpose of this briefing was to better 
understand the current state of border security efforts from 
all the Department of Homeland Security components with a role 
in border security and to identify the need for a national 
strategy to secure the border.
    The second hearing the Subcommittee held further explored 
the technologies currently employed and the future recourse 
plans of the Department. This hearing was held on June 23, 
2013, and was entitled ``A Study in Contrasts: House and Senate 
Approaches to Border Security.'' The purpose of this hearing 
was to assess the disparate border security approaches of the 
House and Senate, and to better inform the legislation that is 
presented to the Congress which will finally seek to achieve 
the outcome of a secure border.
    The Department has struggled to convey metrics that measure 
performance in securing the borders and reflect the state of 
border security. On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee held a 
hearing entitled ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand the State 
of Border Security.'' The purpose of this hearing was to 
examine the status of the Border Condition Index (BCI), and 
further examine outcome-based ways to measure the state of 
border security.
    The Subcommittee considered legislation to require a 
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain situational 
awareness and operational control of the border, and sets the 
time requirements to achieve operational control. H.R. 1417, 
the Border Security Results Act of 2013, was introduced on 
April 9, 2013; considered by the Subcommittee on April 24, 
2013. The Full Committee considered the measure on May 15, 
2013, and reported H.R. 1417 to the House on May 20, 2013.
    In the Second Session the Subcommittee will be further 
examining the threat of spill-over violence stemming from the 
rise of drug cartels and the violent conflict throughout 
Mexico. The Subcommittee will also examine the Department's 
efforts to identify, detain, prioritize, and remove criminal 
aliens from the United States, including those apprehended at 
or near U.S. borders and ports of entry who are subject to 
deportation, particularly those from special interest 
countries.

                 border screening and terrorist travel

    In the first session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee reviewed efforts to ensure the deployment and 
implementation of training and infrastructure enhancements to 
identify, intercept, and disrupt terrorists or others who would 
do our Nation harm and who are within the United States.
    The Subcommittee held hearings on these border screening 
and terrorist travel related topics on May 21, 2013, and 
September 26, 2013. The Chair of the Full Committee and Chair 
of the Subcommittee sent a letters to: The Secretary of 
Homeland Security regarding the expansion of the Global Entry 
trusted traveler program to the Republic of Saudi Arabia; The 
Secretary of Homeland Security regarding Customs and Border 
Protection pre clearance operations to the United Arab Emirates 
Abu Dhabi International Airport; The Director of Immigrations 
and Customs Enforcement and the Deputy Commissioner of Customs 
and Border Protection regarding the Student and Exchange 
Visitor Information System (SEVIS) in the aftermath of the 
Boston Marathon Bombing; The Director of Immigrations and 
Customs Enforcement regarding the release of detainees.
    As part of their efforts to address border screening and 
terrorist travel the Subcommittee held several oversight 
hearings. The Subcommittee explored the security-related 
deficiencies of the visa security program that terrorists could 
use to gain entry to or remain in the country for illegitimate 
purposes. The first hearing which addressed this issue was held 
on May 21, 2013, entitled ``Visa Security and Overstays: How 
Secure is America?'' The purpose of this hearing was to examine 
the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to secure 
the border by addressing challenges in identifying individuals 
who overstay their visas and explore ways to be more effective.
    The second hearing the subcommittee closely examined the 
integration, security, and reliability of criminal, 
immigration, and terrorist databases used to screen persons 
seeking to enter and exit this country. The subcommittee 
closely assessed the development of the Department's 
comprehensive biometric exit system. On September 26, 2013, the 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 
Commission Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.'' The 
purpose of this hearing was to engage with Department of 
Homeland Security Leadership on the current state of biometric 
exit and to chart a path forward to implement a biometric 
system at the nation's ports of entry/exit that is both a 
counterterrorism and border security tool.
    On March 13, 2013 the Subcommittee received a briefing from 
Department of Homeland Security Officials on the state of 
border security which examined the collaborative security 
efforts between ports of entry with other federal, state, and 
local agencies. This briefing was held to better understand the 
current state of border security efforts including the 
integration and effectiveness of transportation and border 
security screening systems at ports of entry for detecting 
high-risk passengers and cargo transported across our borders, 
including efforts to better facilitate travel and trade such as 
implementation of ``trusted traveler'' programs.

                       port and maritime security

    In the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee has examined various aspects of port and maritime 
security, including the security of port facilities and the 
implementation and operation, including technology utilized, of 
the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC). The 
Subcommittee held hearing on these port and maritime security 
related topics on June 18, 2013 and November 19, 2013.
     The subcommittee held its first maritime focused hearing 
on June 18, 2013, entitled ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: 
The Future of the TWIC Program.'' The purpose of this hearing 
was to reexamine the security value of the TWIC card and 
determine the future of the program.
    The Subcommittee held a second maritime related hearing to 
review how the Department manages risk emerging from maritime 
threats and vulnerabilities such as drug and undocumented 
migrant smuggling via small boats and semi-submersible 
submarines. On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a 
hearing entitled ``What Does a Secure Maritime Border Look 
Like?'' The purpose of this hearing was to examine what DHS 
maritime components are doing to interdict maritime threats 
before they arrive on shore or in U.S. ports, what is being 
done to increase the Nation's understanding of illicit networks 
that move in the maritime domain, and examine the Department's 
layered approach to secure the maritime environment, and how 
progress is being measured.
    In the Second Session of the 113th Congress the 
Subcommittee will be further examining the efficiency and 
effectiveness of the Department's supply chain security 
programs, such as the Customs Trade Partnership Against 
Terrorism (C-TPAT) and the Container Security Initiative (CSI), 
to ensure a proper balance between the facilitation of lawful 
trade and the security of the homeland. This will include an 
assessment of implementation of the Maritime and Transportation 
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-295), the Security and 
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-
347), relevant provisions of the Intelligence Reform and 
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-458), and the 
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 
2007(Pub. L. 110-53). Furthermore, the Subcommittee plans to be 
more robust in the review of the Department's efforts in the 
screening of vessels, passengers, cargo, and crew or potential 
terrorists, terrorist weapons, and contraband; nuclear 
detection efforts; the development of international security 
standards for shipping and containers.

                            u.s. coast guard

    During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee reviewed the Coast Guard's homeland security 
missions, which included the ports, waterways, and coastal 
security; drug interdiction; migrant interdiction; and law 
enforcement missions. The Subcommittee held hearings U.S. Coast 
Guard related topics on November 19, 2013.
    The Subcommittee held a hearing focusing on the Coast Guard 
and the other maritime Components of the Department in the 
collaborative effort to secure the border. On November 19, 
2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``What Does a 
Secure Maritime Border Look Like?'' The purpose of this hearing 
was to understand what is being done to increase maritime 
domain awareness and interdict maritime threats before they 
arrive on shore or in U.S. ports. It examined the illicit 
networks that move in the maritime domain, and examined the 
Department's layered approach to secure the maritime 
environment, and how progress is being measured.
    In the Second Session of the 113th Congress the 
Subcommittee will be further examining Coast Guard related 
topics. The Subcommittee will investigate the Coast Guard's 
specific maritime security operations and initiatives, such as 
the International Port Security Program and the inspection of 
vessels originating from ports with inadequate anti-terrorism 
measures. The Subcommittee plans to assess the Coast Guard's 
anti-terrorist capabilities, most notably the Deployable 
Specialized Forces, including Maritime Safety and Security 
Teams, Port Security Units, Tactical Law Enforcement Teams, and 
the Maritime Security Response Team. Additionally, the 
Subcommittee will review Coast Guard resources needed to ensure 
the service is operationally ready to address threats and 
emergencies while pursuing a long-term sustainable path of 
fleet recapitalization. The Committee will specifically examine 
the progress, efficiency, and efficacy of acquisitions programs 
to ensure major procurements remain on schedule without a 
reduction in readiness throughout the service.

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                           aviation security

    Pursuant to the Committee Oversight Plan, the Subcommittee 
examined risks to the aviation system, as well as the 
development and implementation of security measures to reduce 
and mitigate such risks through a series of classified and 
unclassified briefings, hearings, general oversight, and 
legislation. For example, Subcommittee Members received a 
classified briefing on November 20, 2013, to discuss current 
threats to the nation's aviation systems with the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Administrator. A 
number of other briefings pertaining to aviation security 
technologies, policies, and the Department of Homeland 
Security's global strategy for securing the aviation system 
were received on February 5, 2013, June 19, 2013, and June 27, 
2013, respectively. The Subcommittee also conducted meetings 
and held six hearings to receive testimony from TSA, the 
Government Accountability Office (GAO), the DHS Inspector 
General, and private sector stakeholders pertaining to TSA's 
risk-based security initiatives, Federal Air Marshal Service 
operations, and air cargo security.
    In addition to these briefings and hearings, Subcommittee 
Members sent oversight letters to TSA and GAO regarding 
aviation security risks. A letter was sent on March 7, 2013, by 
the Chair of the Subcommittee to the Comptroller General of the 
United States requesting to be a co-requester of the GAO's 
review of TSA's Secure Flight program, which is expected to be 
completed in FY 2014. The Chair and Ranking Member of the 
Subcommittee also sent a letter to the TSA Administrator on 
October 18, 2013, seeking additional information and 
clarification on TSA's decision to shift the responsibility of 
monitoring exit lanes to airport operators.
    Finally, Subcommittee Members and Staff developed and 
refined legislation to improve TSA's ability to protect the 
Nation's aviation systems. H.R. 2719, the Transportation 
Security Acquisition Reform Act, would help improve security 
technology planning and, ultimately, performance in the field. 
H.R. 1204, the Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act, 
would ensure that industry stakeholders continue to have a 
voice in TSA policy decisions through the existing Aviation 
Security Advisory Committee. With passage of this legislation, 
TSA would not be able to allow the Committee's charter to 
expire, which has happened in the past and has prevented the 
private sector from having a formal body to engage the agency 
and make recommendations.

                    passenger and baggage screening

    Committee staff visited the Transportation Security 
Administration Systems Integration Facility on August 28, 2013, 
to observe current and future security screening technology 
research and testing.
    Pursuant to House Rule X, clauses 2(n) and (p), on November 
14, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing to examine TSA's 
Screening Passengers by Observable Techniques (SPOT) Program. 
This hearing looked into the cost effectiveness and overall 
security effectiveness of the SPOT program, based on a report 
from the Government Accountability Office.
    On November 6, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee visited 
the campus of Duke University to observe research being done to 
advance current and future passenger screening technology. 
While in the area, staff also toured Raleigh Durham 
International Airport to observe security operations at the 
airport's security check point.

                   reforming transportation security

    The House passed H.R. 2719, the Transportation Security 
Acquisition Reform Act, introduces greater transparency and 
accountability for TSA spending decisions through a series of 
commonsense reforms. Specifically, it requires TSA to develop 
and share with the public, for the first time, a strategic, 
multiyear technology investment plan; share key information 
with Congress on technology acquisitions, including cost 
overruns, delays, or technical failures within 30 days of 
identifying the problem; establish principles for managing 
equipment in inventory to eliminate expensive storage of 
unusable or outdated technologies; and report on its goals for 
contracting with small businesses.
    H.R. 2719 is budget neutral, and simply requires TSA to do 
a better job of not only managing its own resources, but also 
leveraging resources outside of the Department of Homeland 
Security.
    Further, the House passed H.R. 1204. This bill authorizes 
the Aviation Security Advisory Committee (ASAC) and requires 
TSA to consult with the ASAC on aviation security matters, 
including on the development and implementation of policies, 
programs, rulemakings and security directives. In addition, the 
bill requires the ASAC to submit recommendations to TSA.
    Staff also continued to monitor the progress of the 
Department to implement risk-based screening, such as the 
expansion of TSA's Pre-Check program.

                         surface transportation

    In keeping with the Oversight Plan's intent to review the 
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)'s efforts to 
secure surface transit systems, the chairman of the Full 
Committee, along with the chairmen of the Subcommittees on 
Transportation Security; Counterterrorism and Intelligence; and 
Emergency Preparedness Response and Communications sent a 
letter to the TSA, DHS, and FBI on October 4, 2013, seeking 
information on how state, local, and federal agencies 
collaborate and share information on surface transportation 
security matters.
    Moreover, on September 12, 2013, Committee staff visited 
Washington, D.C.'s Union Station to observe K9 explosives 
detection teams, TSA surface passenger screening, and other 
passenger rail security efforts.

                  transportation security regulations

    Staff visited the Transportation Security Administration 
Systems Integration Facility (TSIF) on August 28, 2013, to 
observe current and future security screening technology 
research and testing.
    Pursuant to House Rule X, clauses 2(n) and (p), on November 
14, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing to examine TSA's 
Screening Passengers by Observable Techniques (SPOT) Program. 
This hearing looked into the cost effectiveness and overall 
security effectiveness of the SPOT program, based on a report 
from the Government Accountability Office.
    On November 6, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee visited 
the campus of Duke University to observe research being done to 
advance current and future passenger screening technology. 
While in the area, staff also toured Raleigh Durham 
International Airport to observe security operations at the 
airport's security check point.

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                       preparedness and response

    During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee conducted 
oversight of efforts at the Federal, State, local, tribal, and 
private sector levels to prepare for, respond to, and recover 
from terrorist attacks and natural disasters. Through a series 
of hearings, a field hearing, briefings, and site visits, the 
Subcommittee worked to ensure that the whole community is 
engaged in these efforts. The Subcommittee held hearings to 
assess the state of preparedness through the lens of the 
National Preparedness Report; assess preparedness for mass 
casualty events; and examine cyber incident response 
capabilities. Subcommittee Members visited the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency's National Response Coordination 
Center, the American Red Cross' Disaster Operations Center, and 
the National Protection and Programs Directorate's National 
Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center to observe 
response capabilities and operations. The Subcommittee will 
continue its oversight of these vital issues during the second 
session of the 113th Congress.

     assistance to state and local governments and first responders

    The Department of Homeland Security has awarded nearly $40 
billion to State and local governments and first responders 
since the September 11th terrorist attacks. To ensure the 
Department is allocating this funding based on risk and 
effectively monitoring the use of funds, the Subcommittee held 
a hearing and classified briefing. In addition, Committee staff 
has held numerous briefings with the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency representatives on the development of 
performance metrics to measure the effectiveness of the grants 
and programmatic and financial monitoring efforts. During the 
second session of the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee will 
continue its oversight of the grant funds, including the 
Department's proposal to develop a new National Preparedness 
Grant Program. The Subcommittee is disappointed that despite 
repeated requests for additional information and legislative 
language on this proposal, the Department has failed to provide 
sufficient information.

chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear planning, preparedness, 
                              and response

    Preparedness for and response to chemical, biological, 
radiological, and nuclear events has remained a focus for the 
Subcommittee in the 113th Congress. The Subcommittee has 
received numerous briefings on the Office of Health Affairs' 
BioWatch, National Biosurveillance Integration Center, and 
Chemical Defense Programs at both the classified and 
unclassified levels. At the Subcommittee's request, the 
Government Accountability Office is conducting a review of the 
National Biosurveillance Integration Center to ensure it is 
meeting its mission and effectively working with interagency 
partners as intended in the Implementing Recommendations of the 
9/11 Commission Act (Pub. L. 110-53). In furtherance of 
oversight conducted in the 112th Congress, the Committee passed 
legislation, H.R. 1791, that was referred to the Subcommittee, 
permitting the use of grant funds for medical preparedness 
activities, including the procurement of vital medical 
countermeasures.

                             communications

    In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee has continued its 
oversight of communications issues with a visit to the 
Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity and 
Communications Integration Center, briefings on the Office of 
Emergency Communications, the First Responder Network Authority 
and the implementation of the Public Safety Broadband Network, 
and the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System. A series of 
hearings on the use of social media and new technology 
considered new and innovative ways to communicate with the 
public before, during, and after emergencies. The Subcommittee 
is considering legislation to authorize the Integrated Public 
Alert and Warning System and has encouraged the Office of 
Emergency Communications to update the National Emergency 
Communications Plan. The Subcommittee will continue its 
oversight of this vital issue during the remainder of the 113th 
Congress.

                  emergency response provider training

    As part of its oversight of first responder training 
programs, the Subcommittee received numerous briefings on DHS-
funded training programs and from Federal and State training 
providers. Committee staff visited the National Emergency 
Response and Rescue Training Center and Maryland Fire Rescue 
Institute and observed training and exercise programs.

                       exercises and simulations

    In the First Session of the 113th Congress, the 
Subcommittee received a briefing from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency's National Exercise Division on the 
implementation of changes to the National Exercise Program. The 
Subcommittee, through its cyber incident response hearing, also 
inquired about lessons learned from National Level Exercise 
2012 and efforts to address issues raised in the recently 
released after action report. Committee staff also participated 
in first responder training. The Subcommittee will continue to 
examine the extent to which lessons learned are reviewed, 
incorporated into programs and plans, and shared with State and 
local exercise participants.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                             cybersecurity

    The Subcommittee held a series of hearings on the topic of 
cybersecurity examining the cyber threat, Department of 
Homeland Security capabilities and resources, privacy and civil 
liberty concerns, the security of the Federal Data Services Hub 
and Healthcare exchanges, and the implementation of Executive 
Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. 
Additionally, the Subcommittee held over 300 meetings with 
stakeholders to determine topics of oversight and need for 
additional legislation.

                         science and technology

    The Subcommittee held a series of meetings with the Science 
and Technology Directorate examining the Department's progress 
in developing and delivering products and technology solutions 
to their customers. As a result of these meetings, the 
Subcommittee drafted and reported favorably H.R. 2952, the 
Critical Infrastructure Research and Development (CIRDA) Act.

                       Chemical Facility Security

    The Subcommittee held a series of meetings with 
stakeholders, including other committees of jurisdiction in the 
House and Senate, to conduct oversight and consider possible 
reauthorization of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism 
Standards program at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 
In addition, the Subcommittee held a hearing on August 1, 2013 
on the topic of mismanagement of the CFATS program. This 
hearing was held pursuant to clause 2(n)(1) of the rule as `` . 
. . mismanagement in Government programs which that committee 
may authorize'' and clause 2(p), as DHS Management is a ``high-
risk'' issue identified by the Comptroller General of the U.S.

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

    departmental efficiency and waste, fraud, abuse, and duplication

    During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee on Oversight 
and Management Efficiency oversaw the Department of Homeland 
Security's day to day operations to ensure that it was 
operating in the most efficient and effective manner possible. 
On February 15, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How Wisely is DHS Spending 
Taxpayer Dollars?'' The purpose of the hearing was to address 
DHS's progress and shortcomings in implementing its various 
missions 10 years after the Department's creation, integrating 
its components, and its diligence in making sure taxpayer 
dollars are being spent efficiently.
    Pursuant to Rule X, clause 2(d)(F) of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee worked to identify 
potential opportunities to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary 
programs, find efficiencies that will contribute to the 
Department's ability to meet its vital missions, and identify 
areas for cost savings. On April 26, 2013, the Subcommittee 
held a hearing entitled ``Cutting DHS Duplication and Wasteful 
Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices and 
Watchdog Recommendations.'' The purpose of this hearing was to 
assess GAO and Inspector General findings related to 
duplication and waste within DHS and examine best practices 
identified by the private sector to improve DHS's efficiency 
and effectiveness. On September 23, 2013, Subcommittee staff 
also received a briefing from GAO officials on the Department's 
progress in addressing GAO's High-Risk List area of 
``Strengthening Department of Homeland Security Management 
Functions.'' The area includes issues related to DHS 
acquisition management, financial management, information 
technology management, human capital management, and management 
integration. GAO's High-Risk List includes areas at high risk 
due to vulnerabilities to fraud, waste, abuse, and 
mismanagement. GAO has included DHS management functions in its 
List since 2003.
    The Committee investigated homeland security programs and 
practices, as warranted. In an effort to review the TSA's 
Passenger Screening Technologies, on February 5, 2013, the 
Members of the Subcommittee on Transportation Security and the 
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency received a 
joint classified briefing. The Subcommittees were briefed by 
representatives from the Government Accountability Office and 
the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector 
General. The briefing addressed the development of the 
technology, challenges with the acquisition process, among 
other issues. In addition, in light of egregious waste related 
to Internal Revenue Service training videos uncovered by the 
Treasury Inspector General, the Subcommittee Chair sent a 
letter on June 6, 2013 to the Undersecretary for Management. 
The purpose of the letter was to determine the cost and types 
of internal training materials, especially videos, created by 
DHS and its components. To date, the Department has not 
provided a response.
    The Subcommittee will continue to oversee the efficiency of 
the Department and issues related to waste, fraud, abuse, and 
duplication.

                         acquisition management

    During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee reviewed the 
efforts of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)to improve 
acquisition outcomes, and to ensure that effective management 
controls are put in place to prevent contract waste, fraud, and 
abuse while promoting efficiency and effectiveness. The 
Subcommittee reviewed the authorities and activities of the 
Undersecretary for Management and Chief Procurement Officer to 
ensure the effective management of these key functions. The 
Subcommittee also examined the impact of the Department's 
acquisition initiatives to enhance processes and improve 
outcomes related to its major acquisition programs. On 
September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers 
Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons Learned.'' The purpose 
of the hearing was to examine DHS's acquisition practices to 
determine if the Department is effectively implementing its 
policies and to assess whether DHS could leverage best 
practices and lessons learned from the Defense Department and 
the private sector. In February 2013, the Subcommittee Chair 
requested to sign-on to ongoing Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) work related to CBP's acquisition of border 
surveillance technology and DHS's multiyear acquisition 
planning process. On March 21, 2013, the Subcommittee Chair, 
along with the Subcommittee Ranking Member, requested GAO 
conduct a review of the tactical communication acquisition 
programs underway in DHS.
    The Subcommittee monitored the Department's efforts to 
leverage strategic sourcing, as outlined in Federal guidance, 
to increase efficiencies. The Subcommittee Chair, along with 
the Chair of the Full Committee, requested GAO to examine the 
Department's ammunition and weapons procurements.
    The Subcommittee will monitor the cost, schedule, and 
performance status of major Department acquisition programs.

                          financial management

    In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee oversaw the 
Department of Homeland Security's progress to properly manage 
financial systems and data to minimize inefficient and wasteful 
spending, make more informed decisions to manage its programs 
and implement Department policies. The Subcommittee reviewed 
the Department's efforts to enhance its managerial cost 
accounting, address internal control weaknesses in financial 
reporting, achieve a clean audit opinion on its financial 
statements, and reduce the reliance on manual data calls to 
collect cost information from the various components and 
compile consolidated, reliable data. The Subcommittee Chair 
sent a letter to the Comptroller General on June 6, 2013 to 
sign-on to an ongoing review of DHS financial management 
efforts being performed at the request of the Senate Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. GAO issued its 
report on September 30, 2013. It contained four recommendations 
for executive action. On July 8, 2013, Subcommittee Staff 
received a briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer 
regarding DHS's efforts to modernize its financial systems. On 
November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled 
``DHS Financial Management: Investigating DHS's Stewardship of 
Taxpayer Dollars.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine 
the financial practices within DHS.
    The Subcommittee will continue to monitor how efficiently 
the Department manages its finances.

                   information technology management

    During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee reviewed the 
Department's efforts to address information technology (IT) 
challenges, including the management and integration of the 
Department's IT systems. The Subcommittee monitored the 
Department's progress in IT architectural planning, investment 
management, cloud computing, policy development, operations, 
and related personnel management. On March 19, 2013, the 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``DHS Information 
Technology: How Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our 
Borders and Uphold Immigration Laws?'' The purpose of the 
hearing was to assess how IT resources are being effectively 
utilized to help secure our borders and uphold immigration laws 
and how the Department is exercising proper management and 
oversight of its IT investments. The Subcommittee Chair, along 
with the Chair of the Full Committee, also requested on May 23, 
2013 to sign on to an ongoing GAO review of the TECS 
modernization program at the request of the Senate Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
    The Subcommittee will continue to monitor the Department's 
management of its information technology.

                         departmental workforce

    Throughout the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee monitored 
the Department's efforts to recruit and retain personnel and to 
address employee concerns set forth in the Office of Personnel 
Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the Department's 
own personnel surveys, which have indicated morale problems 
across the Department. The Subcommittee Chair signed on to 
ongoing Government Accountability (GAO) work assessing DHS's 
recruitment and hiring strategies at the request of the Senate 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The GAO 
issued its report on September 17, 2013. It included one 
recommendation for executive action. On May 7, 
2013,Subcommittee staff were briefed by the Chief Human Capital 
Officer on the Employee Engagement Executive Steering Committee 
and DHS Leadership training to address the morale issues at the 
Department.
    The Subcommittee monitored the Department's efforts to 
effectively and efficiently consolidate its headquarters from 
more than 40 locations throughout the National Capital Region, 
known as the St. Elizabeth's Headquarters Consolidation 
Project. On March 15, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee 
conducted a site visit to the Department of Homeland Security 
Consolidated Headquarters at St. Elizabeths. While on campus, 
Members toured the facility and were briefed by the Department 
on construction progress and the status of consolidation 
efforts. As a follow up to this site visit, the Subcommittee 
Chair requested on March 20, 2013, the GAO to conduct a 
comprehensive review of the consolidation project.
    The Subcommittee will continue efforts to oversee the 
Department's human capital management.

                           employee integrity

    In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee examined employee 
corruption and misconduct issues and their effect on homeland 
security. The Subcommittee reviewed Department statistics and 
case studies associated with employee integrity issues, as well 
as, the effectiveness of policies, procedures, and practices 
the Department utilizes to address such issues. The 
Subcommittee held a joint hearing with the Subcommittee on 
Transportation Security on July 31, 2013, entitled ``TSA 
Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by Airport Security 
Personnel.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine the 
scope of misconduct within the Transportation Security 
Administration and determine to what extent action is being 
taken to address employee integrity issues. On August 19, 2013, 
the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary 
requesting an update on the Department's mandated report on 
investigating corruption in DHS.
    The Subcommittee will continue its oversight of DHS 
employee integrity issues.

                      united states secret service

    In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee examined the 
homeland security operations of the United States Secret 
Service, including its critical role of protecting the 
President of the United States, among other duties. On April 
17, 2013, the Subcommittee held a member briefing with the 
Secret Service Director to discuss the Director's goals and 
priorities, budget issues, Cartigena employee misconduct 
investigation, among other topics.
    Subcommittee staff received a briefing from Secret Service 
officials on June 27, 2013 on the agency's information 
technology modernization efforts. On August 8, 2013, 
Subcommittee staff also received a briefing on the next 
generation Presidential limousine program and conducted a site 
visit at the Secret Service mail screening facility in 
Washington D.C. On November 12, Members of the Subcommittee 
conducted a site visit to the Secret Service training facility 
in Beltsville, Maryland.
    The Subcommittee will continue to examine operations of the 
United States Secret Service.

                      privacy and civil liberties

    During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee monitored the 
Department's efforts to strike an appropriate balance between 
the need to combat terrorist attacks against the United States 
with the privacy expectations and civil rights of U.S. 
citizens. On February 6, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee 
received a classified briefing on privacy issues and the role 
of the Department of Homeland Security and the National 
Counterterrorism Center in collecting, analyzing, and storing 
intelligence on U.S. persons. The Members were briefed by 
representatives from the Department and the National 
Counterterrorism Center, and they learned how the Center is 
implementing its new ``Guidelines for Access, Retention, Use, & 
Dissemination of U.S. Persons Information.''
    On June 19, 2013, Subcommittee staff received a briefing 
from officials from the Office of Civil Rights and Civil 
Liberties on civil liberties concerns at border checkpoints.
    The Subcommittee will continue to examine the Department's 
balance between security and privacy and civil liberties.


=======================================================================


                          A P P E N D I C E S

=======================================================================


                               APPENDIX I

            Committee Rules--Committee on Homeland Security

                        Adopted January 26, 2011

RULE I.--GENERAL PROVISIONS.

        (A) Applicability of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
        Representatives.--The Rules of the U.S. House of 
        Representatives (the ``House'') are the rules of the 
        Committee on Homeland Security (the ``Committee'') and 
        its subcommittees insofar as applicable.

        (B) Applicability to Subcommittees.--Except where the 
        terms ``Full Committee'' and ``subcommittee'' are 
        specifically mentioned, the following rules shall apply 
        to the Committee's subcommittees and their respective 
        Chairmen and Ranking Minority Members to the same 
        extent as they apply to the Full Committee and its 
        Chairman and Ranking Minority Member.

        (C) Appointments by the Chairman.--Clause 2(d) of Rule 
        XI of the House shall govern the designation of a Vice 
        Chairman of the Full Committee.

        (D) Recommendation of Conferees.--Whenever the Speaker 
        of the House is to appoint a conference committee on a 
        matter within the jurisdiction of the Full Committee, 
        the Chairman shall recommend to the Speaker of the 
        House conferees from the Full Committee. In making 
        recommendations of Minority Members as conferees, the 
        Chairman shall do so with the concurrence of the 
        Ranking Minority Member of the Committee.

        (E) Motions to Disagree.--The Chairman is directed to 
        offer a motion under clause 1 of Rule XXII of the Rules 
        of the House whenever the Chairman considers it 
        appropriate.

        (F) Committee Website.--The Chairman shall maintain an 
        official Committee web site for the purposes of 
        furthering the Committee's legislative and oversight 
        responsibilities, including communicating information 
        about the Committee's activities to Committee Members, 
        other Members, and the public at large. The Ranking 
        Minority Member may maintain a similar web site for the 
        same purposes. The official Committee web site shall 
        display a link on its home page to the web site 
        maintained by the Ranking Minority Member.

        (G) Activity Report.--Not later than the 30th day after 
        June 1 and December 1, the Committee shall submit to 
        the House a semiannual report on the activities of the 
        Committee. After adjournment sine die of a regular 
        session of Congress, or after December 15, whichever 
        occurs first, the Chair may file the second or fourth 
        semiannual report with the Clerk at any time and 
        without approval of the Committee provided that a copy 
        of the report has been available to each Member of the 
        Committee for at least seven calendar days and the 
        report includes any supplemental, minority, or 
        additional views submitted by a Member of the 
        Committee.

RULE II.--TIME OF MEETINGS.

        (A) Regular Meeting Date.--The regular meeting date and 
        time for the transaction of business of the Full 
        Committee shall be at 10:00 a.m. on the first Wednesday 
        that the House is in Session each month, unless 
        otherwise directed by the Chairman.

        (B) Additional Meetings.--At the discretion of the 
        Chairman, additional meetings of the Committee may be 
        scheduled for the consideration of any legislation or 
        other matters pending before the Committee or to 
        conduct other Committee business. The Committee shall 
        meet for such purposes pursuant to the call of the 
        Chairman.

        (C) Consideration.--Except in the case of a special 
        meeting held under clause 2(c)(2) of House Rule XI, the 
        determination of the business to be considered at each 
        meeting of the Committee shall be made by the Chairman.

RULE III.--NOTICE AND PUBLICATION.

        (A) Notice.--

                (1) Hearings.--Pursuant to clause 2(g)(3) of 
                rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
                Representatives, the Chairman of the Committee 
                shall make public announcement of the date, 
                place, and subject matter of any hearing before 
                the Full Committee or subcommittee, which may 
                not commence earlier than one week after such 
                notice. However, if the Chairman of the 
                Committee, with the concurrence of the Ranking 
                Minority Member, determines that there is good 
                cause to begin the hearing sooner, or if the 
                Committee so determines by majority vote, a 
                quorum being present for the transaction of 
                business, the Chairman shall make the 
                announcement at the earliest possible date. The 
                names of all witnesses scheduled to appear at 
                such hearing shall be provided to Members no 
                later than 48 hours prior to the commencement 
                of such hearing.

                (2) Meetings.--The date, time, place and 
                subject matter of any meeting, other than a 
                hearing or a regularly scheduled meeting, may 
                not commence earlier than the third day on 
                which Members have notice thereof except in the 
                case of a special meeting called under clause 
                2(c)(2) of House Rule XI. These notice 
                requirements may be waived if the Chairman with 
                the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member, 
                determines that there is good cause to begin 
                the meeting sooner or if the Committee so 
                determines by majority vote, a quorum being 
                present for the transaction of business.

                        (a) Copies of any measure or matter to 
                        be considered for approval by the 
                        Committee at any meeting, including any 
                        mark, print or amendment in the nature 
                        of a substitute shall be provided to 
                        the Members at least 24 hours in 
                        advance.

                        (b) At least 24 hours prior to the 
                        commencement of a meeting for the 
                        markup of a measure or matter, the text 
                        of such measure or matter, including 
                        any mark, print or amendment in the 
                        nature of a substitute, shall be made 
                        publicly available in electronic form 
                        and, to the extent practicable, posted 
                        on the official Committee web site.

                        (c) Not later than 24 hours after 
                        concluding a meeting to consider a 
                        measure or matter, the text of such 
                        measure or matter as ordered forwarded 
                        or reported, including any adopted 
                        amendments, shall be made publicly 
                        available in electronic form and, to 
                        the extent practicable, posted on the 
                        official Committee web site.

                (3) Publication.--The meeting or hearing 
                announcement shall be promptly published in the 
                Daily Digest portion of the Congressional 
                Record. To the greatest extent practicable, 
                meeting announcements shall be entered into the 
                Committee scheduling service of the House 
                Information Resources.

RULE IV.--OPEN MEETINGS AND HEARINGS; BROADCASTING.

        (A) Open Meetings.--All meetings and hearings of the 
        Committee shall be open to the public including to 
        radio, television, and still photography coverage, 
        except as provided by Rule XI of the Rules of the House 
        or when the Committee, in open session and with a 
        majority present, determines by recorded vote that all 
        or part of the remainder of that hearing on that day 
        shall be closed to the public because disclosure of 
        testimony, evidence, or other matters to be considered 
        would endanger the national security, compromise 
        sensitive law enforcement information, tend to defame, 
        degrade or incriminate a witness, or violate any law or 
        rule of the House of Representatives.

        (B) Broadcasting.--Whenever any hearing or meeting 
        conducted by the Committee is open to the public, the 
        Committee shall permit that hearing or meeting to be 
        covered by television broadcast, internet broadcast, 
        print media, and still photography, or by any of such 
        methods of coverage, in accordance with the provisions 
        of clause 4 of Rule XI of the Rules of the House. 
        Operation and use of any Committee operated broadcast 
        system shall be fair and nonpartisan and in accordance 
        with clause 4(b) of Rule XI and all other applicable 
        rules of the Committee and the House. Priority shall be 
        given by the Committee to members of the Press 
        Galleries. Pursuant to clause 2(e) of rule XI of the 
        Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee 
        shall, to the greatest extent practicable, provide 
        audio and video coverage of each hearing or meeting in 
        a manner that allows the public to easily listen to and 
        view the proceedings and shall maintain the recordings 
        of such coverage in a manner that is easily accessible 
        to the public.

        (C) Transcripts.--A transcript shall be made of the 
        testimony of each witness appearing before the 
        Committee during a Committee hearing. All transcripts 
        of meetings or hearings that are open to the public 
        shall be made available.

RULE V.--PROCEDURES FOR MEETINGS AND HEARINGS.

        (A) Opening Statements.--At any meeting of the 
        Committee, the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member 
        shall be entitled to present oral opening statements of 
        five minutes each. Other Members may submit written 
        opening statements for the record. The Chairman 
        presiding over the meeting may permit additional 
        opening statements by other Members of the Full 
        Committee or of that subcommittee, with the concurrence 
        of the Ranking Minority Member.

        (B) The Five--Minute Rule.--The time any one Member may 
        address the Committee on any bill, motion, or other 
        matter under consideration by the Committee shall not 
        exceed five minutes, and then only when the Member has 
        been recognized by the Chairman, except that this time 
        limit may be extended when permitted by unanimous 
        consent.

        (C) Postponement of Vote.--The Chairman may postpone 
        further proceedings when a record vote is ordered on 
        the question of approving any measure or matter or 
        adopting an amendment. The Chairman may resume 
        proceedings on a postponed vote at any time, provided 
        that all reasonable steps have been taken to notify 
        Members of the resumption of such proceedings, 
        including, when practicable, circulation of notice by 
        the Clerk of the Committee. When proceedings resume on 
        a postponed question, notwithstanding any intervening 
        order for the previous question, an underlying 
        proposition shall remain subject to further debate or 
        amendment to the same extent as when the question was 
        postponed.

        (D) Contempt Procedures.--No recommendation that a 
        person be cited for contempt of Congress shall be 
        forwarded to the House unless and until the Full 
        Committee has, upon notice to all its Members, met and 
        considered the alleged contempt. The person to be cited 
        for contempt shall be afforded, upon notice of at least 
        72 hours, an opportunity to state why he or she should 
        not be held in contempt prior to a vote of the Full 
        Committee, with a quorum being present, on the question 
        whether to forward such recommendation to the House. 
        Such statement shall be, in the discretion of the 
        Chairman, either in writing or in person before the 
        Full Committee.

RULE VI.--WITNESSES.

        (A) Questioning of Witnesses.--

                (1) Questioning of witnesses by Members will be 
                conducted under the five--minute rule unless 
                the Committee adopts a motion permitted by 
                clause 2(j)(2) of House Rule XI.

                (2) In questioning witnesses under the five--
                minute rule, the Chairman and the Ranking 
                Minority Member shall first be recognized. In a 
                subcommittee meeting or hearing, the Chairman 
                and Ranking Minority Member of the Full 
                Committee are then recognized. All other 
                Members that arrive before the commencement of 
                the meeting or hearing will be recognized in 
                the order of seniority on the Committee, 
                alternating between Majority and Minority 
                Members. Committee Members arriving after the 
                commencement of the hearing shall be recognized 
                in order of appearance, alternating between 
                Majority and Minority Members, after all 
                Members present at the beginning of the hearing 
                have been recognized. Each Member shall be 
                recognized at least once before any Member is 
                given a second opportunity to question a 
                witness.

                (3) The Chairman, in consultation with the 
                Ranking Minority Member, or the Committee by 
                motion, may permit an extension of the period 
                of questioning of a witness beyond five minutes 
                but the time allotted must be equally 
                apportioned to the Majority party and the 
                Minority and may not exceed one hour in the 
                aggregate.

                (4) The Chairman, in consultation with the 
                Ranking Minority Member, or the Committee by 
                motion, may permit Committee staff of the 
                Majority and Minority to question a witness for 
                a specified period of time, but the time 
                allotted must be equally apportioned to the 
                Majority and Minority staff and may not exceed 
                one hour in the aggregate.

        (B) Minority Witnesses.--Whenever a hearing is 
        conducted by the Committee upon any measure or matter, 
        the Minority party Members on the Committee shall be 
        entitled, upon request to the Chairman by a majority of 
        those Minority Members before the completion of such 
        hearing, to call witnesses selected by the Minority to 
        testify with respect to that measure or matter during 
        at least one day of hearing thereon.

        (C) Oath or Affirmation.--The Chairman of the Committee 
        or any Member designated by the Chairman, may 
        administer an oath to any witness.

        (D) Statements by Witnesses.--

                (1) Consistent with the notice given, witnesses 
                shall submit a prepared or written statement 
                for the record of the proceedings (including, 
                where practicable, an electronic copy) with the 
                Clerk of the Committee no less than 48 hours in 
                advance of the witness's appearance before the 
                Committee. Unless the 48 hour requirement is 
                waived or otherwise modified by the Chairman, 
                after consultation with the Ranking Minority 
                Member, the failure to comply with this 
                requirement may result in the exclusion of the 
                written testimony from the hearing record and/
                or the barring of an oral presentation of the 
                testimony. The Clerk of the Committee shall 
                provide any such prepared or written statement 
                submitted to the Clerk prior to the hearing to 
                the Members of the Committee prior to the 
                commencement of the hearing.

                (2) To the greatest extent practicable, the 
                written testimony of each witness appearing in 
                a non--governmental capacity shall include a 
                curriculum vita and a disclosure of the amount 
                and source (by agency and program) of any 
                Federal grant (or subgrant thereof) or contract 
                (or subcontract thereof) received during the 
                current fiscal year or either of the two 
                preceding fiscal years by the witness or by an 
                entity represented by the witness. Such 
                disclosures shall be made publicly available, 
                with appropriate redactions to protect the 
                privacy of the witness, in electronic form not 
                later than one day after the witness appears.

RULE VII.--QUORUM.

    Quorum Requirements.--Two Members shall constitute a quorum 
for purposes of taking testimony and receiving evidence. One--
third of the Members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum 
for conducting business, except for (1) reporting a measure or 
recommendation; (2) closing Committee meetings to the public, 
pursuant to Committee Rule IV; (3) authorizing the issuance of 
subpoenas; and (4) any other action for which an actual 
majority quorum is required by any rule of the House of 
Representatives or by law. The Chairman shall make reasonable 
efforts, including consultation with the Ranking Minority 
Member when scheduling meetings and hearings, to ensure that a 
quorum for any purpose will include at least one Minority 
Member of the Committee.

RULE VIII.--DECORUM.

        (A) Breaches of Decorum.--The Chairman may punish 
        breaches of order and decorum, by censure and exclusion 
        from the hearing; and the Committee may cite the 
        offender to the House for contempt.

        (B) Access to Dais.----Access to the dais before, 
        during, and after a hearing, markup, or other meeting 
        of the Committee shall be limited to Members and staff 
        of the Committee. Subject to availability of space on 
        the dais, Committee Members' personal staff may be 
        present on the dais during a hearing if their employing 
        Member is seated on the dais and during a markup or 
        other meeting if their employing Member is the author 
        of a measure or amendment under consideration by the 
        Committee, but only during the time that the measure or 
        amendment is under active consideration by the 
        Committee, or otherwise at the discretion of the 
        Chairman, or of the Ranking Minority Member for 
        personal staff employed by a Minority Member.

        (C) Wireless Communications Use Prohibited.--During a 
        hearing, mark--up, or other meeting of the Committee, 
        ringing or audible sounds or conversational use of 
        cellular telephones or other electronic devices is 
        prohibited in the Committee room.

RULE IX.--SUBCOMMITTEES.

        (A) Generally.--The Full Committee shall be organized 
        into the following six standing subcommittees and shall 
        have specific responsibility for such measures or 
        matters as the Chairman refers to it:

                (1)  Subcommittee on Border and Maritime 
                Security

                (2)  Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, 
                Response and Communications

                (3)  Subcommittee on Transportation Security

                (4)  Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and 
                Intelligence

                (5)  Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, 
                Infrastructure Protection, and Security 
                Technologies

                (6)  Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, 
                and Management

        (B) Selection and Ratio of Subcommittee Members.--The 
        Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Full 
        Committee shall select their respective Members of each 
        subcommittee. The ratio of Majority to Minority Members 
        shall be comparable to the Full Committee, except that 
        each subcommittee shall have at least two more Majority 
        Members than Minority Members.

        (C) Ex Officio Members.--The Chairman and Ranking 
        Minority Member of the Full Committee shall be ex 
        officio members of each subcommittee but are not 
        authorized to vote on matters that arise before each 
        subcommittee. The Chairman and Ranking Minority Member 
        of the Full Committee shall only be counted to satisfy 
        the quorum requirement for the purpose of taking 
        testimony and receiving evidence.

        (D) Powers and Duties of Subcommittees.--Except as 
        otherwise directed by the Chairman of the Full 
        Committee, each subcommittee is authorized to meet, 
        hold hearings, receive testimony, mark up legislation, 
        and report to the Full Committee on all matters within 
        its purview. Subcommittee Chairmen shall set hearing 
        and meeting dates only with the approval of the 
        Chairman of the Full Committee. To the greatest extent 
        practicable, no more than one meeting and hearing 
        should be scheduled for a given time.

        (E) Special Voting Provision.--If a tie vote occurs in 
        a Subcommittee on the question of forwarding any 
        measure to the Full Committee, the measure shall be 
        placed on the agenda for Full Committee consideration 
        as if it had been ordered reported by the Subcommittee 
        without recommendation.

RULE X.--COMMITTEE PANELS.

        (A) Designation.--The Chairman of the Full Committee, 
        with the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member, 
        may designate a panel of the Committee consisting of 
        Members of the Committee to inquire into and take 
        testimony on a matter or matters that warrant enhanced 
        consideration and to report to the Committee.

        (B) Duration.--No panel appointed by the Chairman shall 
        continue in existence for more than six months after 
        the appointment.

        (C) Party Ratios and Appointment.--Consistent with the 
        party ratios established by the Majority party, all 
        Majority members of the panels shall be appointed by 
        the Chairman of the Committee, and all Minority members 
        shall be appointed by the Ranking Minority Member of 
        the Committee. The Chairman of the Committee shall 
        choose one of the Majority Members so appointed who 
        does not currently chair another Subcommittee of the 
        Committee to serve as Chairman of the panel. The 
        Ranking Minority Member of the Committee shall 
        similarly choose the Ranking Minority Member of the 
        panel.

        (D) Ex Officio Members.--The Chairman and Ranking 
        Minority Member of the Full Committee may serve as ex--
        officio Members of each committee panel but are not 
        authorized to vote on matters that arise before a 
        committee panel and shall not be counted to satisfy the 
        quorum requirement for any purpose other than taking 
        testimony.

        (E) Jurisdiction.--No panel shall have legislative 
        jurisdiction.

        (F) Applicability of Committee Rules.--Any designated 
        panel shall be subject to all Committee Rules herein.

RULE XI.--REFERRALS TO SUBCOMMITTEES.

    Referral of Bills and Other Matters by Chairman.--Except 
for bills and other matters retained by the Chairman for Full 
Committee consideration, each bill or other matter referred to 
the Full Committee shall be referred by the Chairman to one or 
more subcommittees within two weeks of receipt by the 
Committee. In referring any measure or matter to a 
subcommittee, the Chair may specify a date by which the 
subcommittee shall report thereon to the Full Committee. Bills 
or other matters referred to subcommittees may be reassigned or 
discharged by the Chairman.

RULE XII.--SUBPOENAS.

        (A) Authorization.--Pursuant to clause 2(m) of Rule XI 
        of the House, a subpoena may be authorized and issued 
        under the seal of the House and attested by the Clerk 
        of the House, and may be served by any person 
        designated by the Full Committee for the furtherance of 
        an investigation with authorization by--

                (1) a majority of the Full Committee, a quorum 
                being present; or

                (2) the Chairman of the Full Committee, after 
                consultation with the Ranking Minority Member 
                of the Full Committee, during any period for 
                which the House has adjourned for a period in 
                excess of 3 days pursuant to a concurrent 
                resolution when, in the opinion of the Chairman 
                of the Full Committee, authorization and 
                issuance of the subpoena is necessary to obtain 
                the material or testimony set forth in the 
                subpoena. The Chairman of the Full Committee 
                shall notify Members of the Committee of the 
                authorization and issuance of a subpoena under 
                this rule as soon as practicable, but in no 
                event later than one week after service of such 
                subpoena.

        (B) Disclosure.--Provisions may be included in a 
        subpoena with the concurrence of the Chairman and the 
        Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, or by 
        the Committee, to prevent the disclosure of the Full 
        Committee's demands for information when deemed 
        necessary for the security of information or the 
        progress of an investigation, including but not limited 
        to prohibiting the revelation by witnesses and their 
        counsel of Full Committee's inquiries.

        (C) Subpoena duces tecum.--A subpoena duces tecum may 
        be issued whose return to the Committee Clerk shall 
        occur at a time and place other than that of a 
        regularly scheduled meeting.

        (D) Affidavits and Depositions.--The Chairman of the 
        Full Committee, in consultation with the Ranking 
        Minority Member of the Full Committee, or the Committee 
        may authorize the taking of an affidavit or deposition 
        with respect to any person who is subpoenaed under 
        these rules but who is unable to appear in person to 
        testify as a witness at any hearing or meeting. Notices 
        for the taking of depositions shall specify the date, 
        time and place of examination. Depositions shall be 
        taken under oath administered by a Member or a person 
        otherwise authorized by law to administer oaths. Prior 
        consultation with the Ranking Minority Member of the 
        Full Committee shall include written notice three 
        business days before any deposition is scheduled to 
        provide an opportunity for Minority staff to be present 
        during the questioning.

RULE XIII.--COMMITTEE STAFF.

        (A) Generally.--Committee staff members are subject to 
        the provisions of clause 9 of House Rule X and must be 
        eligible to be considered for routine access to 
        classified information.

        (B) Staff Assignments.--For purposes of these rules, 
        Committee staff means the employees of the Committee, 
        detailees, fellows, or any other person engaged by 
        contract or otherwise to perform services for, or at 
        the request of, the Committee. All such persons shall 
        be either Majority, Minority, or shared staff. The 
        Chairman shall appoint, determine remuneration of, 
        supervise, and may remove Majority staff. The Ranking 
        Minority Member shall appoint, determine remuneration 
        of, supervise, and may remove Minority staff. In 
        consultation with the Ranking Minority Member, the 
        Chairman may appoint, determine remuneration of, 
        supervise and may remove shared staff that is assigned 
        to service of the Committee. The Chairman shall certify 
        Committee staff appointments, including appointments by 
        the Ranking Minority Member, as required.

        (C) Divulgence of Information.--Prior to the public 
        acknowledgement by the Chairman or the Committee of a 
        decision to initiate an investigation of a particular 
        person, entity, or subject, no member of the Committee 
        staff shall knowingly divulge to any person any 
        information, including non--classified information, 
        which comes into his or her possession by virtue of his 
        or her status as a member of the Committee staff, if 
        the member of the Committee staff has a reasonable 
        expectation that such information may alert the subject 
        of a Committee investigation to the existence, nature, 
        or substance of such investigation, unless authorized 
        to do so by the Chairman or the Committee.

RULE XIV.--COMMITTEE MEMBER AND COMMITTEE STAFF TRAVEL.

        (A) Approval of Travel.--Consistent with the primary 
        expense resolution and such additional expense 
        resolutions as may have been approved, travel to be 
        reimbursed from funds set aside for the Committee for 
        any Committee Member or Committee staff shall be paid 
        only upon the prior authorization of the Chairman. 
        Travel may be authorized by the Chairman for any 
        Committee Member or Committee staff only in connection 
        with official Committee business, such as the 
        attendance of hearings conducted by the Committee and 
        meetings, conferences, site visits, and investigations 
        that involve activities or subject matters under the 
        general jurisdiction of the Full Committee.

                (1) Proposed Travel by Majority Party Committee 
                Members and Committee Staff.--In the case of 
                proposed travel by Majority party Committee 
                Members or Committee staff, before such 
                authorization is given, there shall be 
                submitted to the Chairman in writing the 
                following: (a) the purpose of the travel; (b) 
                the dates during which the travel is to be made 
                and the date or dates of the event for which 
                the travel is being made; (c) the location of 
                the event for which the travel is to be made; 
                (d) the estimated total cost of the travel; and 
                (e) the names of Members and staff seeking 
                authorization. On the basis of that 
                information, the Chairman shall determine 
                whether the proposed travel is for official 
                Committee business, concerns a subject matter 
                under the jurisdiction of the Full Committee, 
                and is not excessively costly in view of the 
                Committee business proposed to be conducted.

                (2) Proposed Travel by Minority Party Committee 
                Members and Committee Staff.--In the case of 
                proposed travel by Minority party Committee 
                Members or Committee staff, the Ranking 
                Minority Member shall provide to the Chairman a 
                written representation setting forth the 
                information specified in items (a), (b), (c), 
                (d) and (e) of subparagraph (1) and his or her 
                determination that such travel complies with 
                the other requirements of subparagraph (1).

        (B) Foreign Travel.--All Committee Members and 
        Committee staff requests for foreign travel must 
        include a written representation setting forth the 
        information specified in items (a), (b), (c), (d) and 
        (e) of subparagraph (A)(1) and be submitted to the 
        Chairman not fewer than ten business days prior to the 
        start of the travel. Within thirty days of the 
        conclusion of any such foreign travel authorized under 
        this rule, there shall be submitted to the Chairman a 
        written report summarizing the information gained as a 
        result of the travel in question, or other Committee 
        objectives served by such travel. The requirements of 
        this section may be waived or abridged by the Chairman.

        (C) Compliance with Committee Travel Policy and 
        Guidelines.--Travel must be in accordance with the 
        Committee Travel Policy and Guidelines, as well as with 
        House Rules, the Travel Guidelines and Regulations and 
        any additional guidance set forth by the Committee on 
        Ethics and the Committee on House Administration. 
        Committee Members and staff shall follow these rules, 
        policies, guidelines, and regulations in requesting and 
        proceeding with any Committee--related travel.

RULE XV.--CLASSIFIED AND CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

        (A) Security Precautions.--Committee staff offices, 
        including Majority and Minority offices, shall operate 
        under strict security precautions administered by the 
        Security Officer of the Committee. A security officer 
        shall be on duty at all times during normal office 
        hours. Classified documents and controlled unclassified 
        information (CUI)-- formerly known as sensitive but 
        unclassified (SBU) information-- may be destroyed, 
        discussed, examined, handled, reviewed, stored, 
        transported and used only in an appropriately secure 
        manner in accordance with all applicable laws, 
        executive orders, and other governing authorities. Such 
        documents may be removed from the Committee's offices 
        only in furtherance of official Committee business. 
        Appropriate security procedures, as determined by the 
        Chairman in consultation with the Ranking Minority 
        Member, shall govern the handling of such documents 
        removed from the Committee's offices.

        (B) Temporary Custody of Executive Branch Material.--
        Executive branch documents or other materials 
        containing classified information in any form that were 
        not made part of the record of a Committee hearing, did 
        not originate in the Committee or the House, and are 
        not otherwise records of the Committee shall, while in 
        the custody of the Committee, be segregated and 
        maintained by the Committee in the same manner as 
        Committee records that are classified. Such documents 
        and other materials shall be returned to the Executive 
        branch agency from which they were obtained at the 
        earliest practicable time.

        (C) Access by Committee Staff.--Access to classified 
        information supplied to the Committee shall be limited 
        to Committee staff members with appropriate security 
        clearances and a need--to--know, as determined by the 
        Chairman or Ranking Minority Member, and under the 
        direction of the Majority or Minority Staff Directors.

        (D) Maintaining Confidentiality.--No Committee Member 
        or Committee staff shall disclose, in whole or in part 
        or by way of summary, to any person who is not a 
        Committee Member or authorized Committee staff for any 
        purpose or in connection with any proceeding, judicial 
        or otherwise, any testimony given before the Committee 
        in executive session. Classified information and 
        controlled unclassified information (CUI) shall be 
        handled in accordance with all applicable laws, 
        executive orders, and other governing authorities and 
        consistently with the provisions of these rules and 
        Committee procedures.

        (E) Oath.--Before a Committee Member or Committee staff 
        may have access to classified information, the 
        following oath (or affirmation) shall be executed:

                I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will not 
                disclose any classified information received in 
                the course of my service on the Committee on 
                Homeland Security, except as authorized by the 
                Committee or the House of Representatives or in 
                accordance with the Rules of such Committee or 
                the Rules of the House.

        Copies of the executed oath (or affirmation) shall be 
        retained by the Clerk of the Committee as part of the 
        records of the Committee.

        (F) Disciplinary Action.--The Chairman shall 
        immediately consider disciplinary action in the event 
        any Committee Member or Committee staff member fails to 
        conform to the provisions of these rules governing the 
        disclosure of classified or unclassified information. 
        Such disciplinary action may include, but shall not be 
        limited to, immediate dismissal from the Committee 
        staff, criminal referral to the Justice Department, and 
        notification of the Speaker of the House. With respect 
        to Minority staff, the Chairman shall consider such 
        disciplinary action in consultation with the Ranking 
        Minority Member.

RULE XVI.--COMMITTEE RECORDS.

        (A) Committee Records.--Committee Records shall 
        constitute all data, charts and files in possession of 
        the Committee and shall be maintained in accordance 
        with clause 2(e) of House Rule XI .

        (B) Legislative Calendar.--The Clerk of the Committee 
        shall maintain a printed calendar for the information 
        of each Committee Member showing any procedural or 
        legislative measures considered or scheduled to be 
        considered by the Committee, and the status of such 
        measures and such other matters as the Committee 
        determines shall be included. The calendar shall be 
        revised from time to time to show pertinent changes. A 
        copy of such revisions shall be made available to each 
        Member of the Committee upon request.

        (C) Members Right To Access.--Members of the Committee 
        and of the House shall have access to all official 
        Committee Records. Access to Committee files shall be 
        limited to examination within the Committee offices at 
        reasonable times. Access to Committee Records that 
        contain classified information shall be provided in a 
        manner consistent with these rules.

        (D) Removal of Committee Records.--Files and records of 
        the Committee are not to be removed from the Committee 
        offices. No Committee files or records that are not 
        made publicly available shall be photocopied by any 
        Member.

        (E) Executive Session Records.--Evidence or testimony 
        received by the Committee in executive session shall 
        not be released or made available to the public unless 
        agreed to by the Committee. Members may examine the 
        Committee's executive session records, but may not make 
        copies of, or take personal notes from, such records.

        (F) Availability of Committee Records.--The Committee 
        shall keep a complete record of all Committee action 
        including recorded votes and attendance at hearings and 
        meetings. Information so available for public 
        inspection shall include a description of each 
        amendment, motion, order, or other proposition, 
        including the name of the Member who offered the 
        amendment, motion, order, or other proposition, and the 
        name of each Member voting for and each Member voting 
        against each such amendment, motion, order, or 
        proposition, as well as the names of those Members 
        present but not voting. Such record shall be made 
        available to the public at reasonable times within the 
        Committee offices and also made publicly available in 
        electronic form and posted on the official Committee 
        web site within 48 hours of such record vote.

        (G) Separate and Distinct.--All Committee records and 
        files must be kept separate and distinct from the 
        office records of the Members serving as Chairman and 
        Ranking Minority Member. Records and files of Members' 
        personal offices shall not be considered records or 
        files of the Committee.

        (H) Disposition of Committee Records.--At the 
        conclusion of each Congress, non--current records of 
        the Committee shall be delivered to the Archivist of 
        the United States in accordance with Rule VII of the 
        Rules of the House.

        (I) Archived Records.--The records of the Committee at 
        the National Archives and Records Administration shall 
        be made available for public use in accordance with 
        Rule VII of the Rules of the House. The Chairman shall 
        notify the Ranking Minority Member of any decision, 
        pursuant to clause 3(b)(3) or clause 4(b) of the Rule, 
        to withhold a record otherwise available, and the 
        matter shall be presented to the Committee for a 
        determination on the written request of any member of 
        the Committee. The Chairman shall consult with the 
        Ranking Minority Member on any communication from the 
        Archivist of the United States or the Clerk of the 
        House concerning the disposition of noncurrent records 
        pursuant to clause 3(b) of the Rule.

RULE XVII.-- COMMITTEE RULES.

        (A) Availability of Committee Rules in Electronic 
        Form.--Pursuant to clause 2(a) of rule XI of the Rules 
        of the House of Representatives, the Committee shall 
        make its rules publicly available in electronic form 
        and posted on the official Committee web site and shall 
        submit such rules for publication in the Congressional 
        Record not later than 30 days after the Chairman of the 
        Committee is elected in each odd--numbered year.

        (B) Changes to Committee Rules.--These rules may be 
        modified, amended, or repealed by the Full Committee 
        provided that a notice in writing of the proposed 
        change has been given to each Member at least 48 hours 
        prior to the meeting at which action thereon is to be 
        taken and such changes are not inconsistent with the 
        Rules of the House of Representatives.
                              APPENDIX II

                           Membership Changes

                              January 2013

    On January 3, 2013, Mr. Michael T. McCaul of Texas was elected as 
Chair, and Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi as Ranking Member 
pursuant to H. Res. 6 and H. Res. 7, respectively.
    Minority Members were elected to the Committee on January 3, 2013, 
pursuant to H. Res. 7.
    Majority Members were elected to the Committee on January 4, 2013, 
pursuant to H. Res. 17.
    Ms. Janice Hahn of California resigned as a Member of the Committee 
on Homeland Security on January 14, 2013; and Mr. Filemon Vela of 
Texas, Mr. Steven A. Horsford of Nevada, and Mr. Eric Swalwell of 
California were elected to the Committee pursuant to H. Res. 22.
    The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee 
Membership was as follows:
                               __________

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Keith J. Rothfus, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania           Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                 ______
                                 

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Keith J. Rothfus, Pennsylvania
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Keith J. Rothfus, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                               April 2013

    Mr. Keith J. Rothfus of Pennsylvania resigned as a Member of the 
Committee on Homeland Security on April 16, 2013.
    The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee 
Memberships was as follows:
                               __________

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Vacancy                             Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                 ______
                                 

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                               June 2013

    Mr. Mark Sanford of South Carolina was elected to the Committee 
pursuant to H. Res. 257 on June 12, 2013.
    The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee 
Memberships was as follows:
                               __________

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina        Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                 ______
                                 

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                              August 2013

    On August 1, 2013, the Chair announced the appointments of Vice 
Chairs for the Subcommittees.
    The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee 
Memberships was as follows:
                               __________

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina        Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                 ______
                                 

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Vice Chair
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi, 
Vice Chair
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)

                           December 11, 2013

    Mr. Chris Stewart of Utah resigned as a Member of the Committee on 
Homeland Security on April 16, 2013.
    The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee 
Memberships was as follows:
                               __________

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                   Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice 
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Vacancy                             Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                 ______
                                 

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

                   Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

                 Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Loretta Sanchez, California
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY 
                              TECHNOLOGIES

                 Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania, Vice 
Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    William R. Keating, Massachusetts
                                    Filemon Vela, Texas
                                    Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

          SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

                 Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Ron Barber, Arizona
                                    Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Beto O'Rourke, Texas
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

                Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Vice Chair
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana, 
                                    Ranking Member
                                    Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
                                    Eric Swalwell, California
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                                 ______
                                 

  SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

                   Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi, 
Vice Chair
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
                  (ex officio)      Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
                                    Yvette D. Clarke, New York
                                    Brian Higgins, New York
                                    Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
                                                      (ex officio)
                              APPENDIX III

                          List of Public Laws

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Public Law                    Date Approved                Bill                     Title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-27..............................  August 9, 2013.........  H.R. 1344.............  ``Helping Heroes Fly
                                                                                        Act''
                                                                                       To amend title 49, United
                                                                                        States Code, to direct
                                                                                        the Assistant Secretary
                                                                                        of Homeland Security
                                                                                        (Transportation Security
                                                                                        Administration) to
                                                                                        provide expedited air
                                                                                        passenger screening to
                                                                                        severely injured or
                                                                                        disabled members of the
                                                                                        Armed Forces and
                                                                                        severely injured or
                                                                                        disabled veterans, and
                                                                                        for other purposes.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              APPENDIX IV

                           Committee Reports
 H.Rpt. 113-87           Border Security Results Act of 2013
    H.R.1417            To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to
                         develop a comprehensive strategy to gain and
                         maintain operational control of the
                         international borders of the United States, and
                         for other purposes.
                        Filed May 20, 2013.H.Rpt. 113-273          Medical Preparedness Allowable Use Act
    H.R. 1791           To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
                         codify authority under existing grant guidance
                         authorizing use of Urban Area Security
                         Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant
                         Program funding for enhancing medical
                         preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass
                         prophylaxis capabilities, with an amendment.
                        Filed November 21, 2013.H.Rpt. 113-274          TSA Loose Change Act
    H.R. 1095           To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct
                         the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
                         (Transportation Security Administration) to
                         transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport
                         security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations
                         that provide places of rest and recuperation at
                         airports for members of the Armed Forces and
                         their families, and for other purposes, with an
                         amendment.
                        Filed November 21, 2013.H.Rpt. 113-275          Transportation Security Acquisition Reform Act
    H.R. 2719           To require the Transportation Security
                         Administration to implement best practices and
                         improve transparency with regard to technology
                         acquisition programs, and for other purposes,
                         with an amendment.
                        Filed November 21, 2013.H. Rpt. 113-278         Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act
    H.R. 1204            of 2013
                        To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct
                         the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
                         (Transportation Security Administration) to
                         establish an Aviation Security Advisory
                         Committee, and for other purposes.
                        Filed December 2, 2013.H. Rpt. 113-294          Homeland Security Cybersecurity Boots-on-the-
    H.R. 3107            Ground Act
                        To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to
                         establish cybersecurity occupation
                         classifications, assess the cybersecurity
                         workforce, develop a strategy to address
                         identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce,
                         and for other purposes.
                        Filed December 12, 2013. 

                               APPENDIX V

            Status of Legislation Referred to the Committee

                              PUBLIC LAWS


    Pub. Law 112-54 H.R. 1444._Helping Heroes Fly Act. To amend 
title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary 
of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) 
to provide expedited air passenger screening to severely 
injured or disabled members of the Armed Forces and severely 
injured or disabled veterans, and for other purposes. Referred 
to Homeland Security Mar. 21, 2013. Rules suspended. Passed 
House amended May 21, 2013; Roll No. 166: 413-0. Received in 
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation May 
22, 2013.


                       LEGISLATION IN THE SENATE


    H.R. 1542._WMD Intelligence and Information Sharing Act of 
2013. To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish 
weapons of mass destruction intelligence and information 
sharing functions of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of 
the Department of Homeland Security and to require 
dissemination of information analyzed by the Department to 
entities with responsibilities relating to homeland security, 
and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Apr. 12, 
2013. Rules suspended. Passed House July 22, 2013; Roll No. 
375: 388-3. Received in Senate and referred to Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs July 23, 2013.
    H.R. 1095._ TSA Loose Change Act. To amend title 49, United 
States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland 
Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer 
unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to 
nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and 
recuperation at airports for members of the Armed Forces and 
their families, and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland 
Security Mar. 12, 2013. Committee ordered reported Oct. 29, 
2013. Reported amended Nov. 21, 2013; Rept. 113-274. Passed 
House Dec. 3, 2013; voice. Received in Senate and referred to 
Commerce, Science and Transportation Dec. 9, 2013.
    H.R. 1204._Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act 
of 2013. To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the 
Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation 
Security Administration) to establish an Aviation Security 
Advisory Committee, and for other purposes. Referred to 
Homeland Security Mar. 14, 2013. Committee ordered reported 
Oct. 29, 2013. Reported amended Dec. 2, 2013; Rept. 113-278. 
Passed House Dec. 3, 2013; Roll No. 617: 411-3. Received in 
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation 
Dec. 9, 2013.
    H.R. 2719._Transportation Security Acquisition Reform Act. 
To require the Transportation Security Administration to 
implement best practices and improve transparency with regard 
to technology acquisition programs, and for other purposes. 
Referred to Homeland Security Jul. 18, 2013. Committee ordered 
reported Oct. 29, 2013. Reported amended Nov. 21, 2013; Rept. 
113-275. Passed House Dec. 3, 2013; Roll No. 616: 416-3. 
Received in Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and 
Transportation Dec. 9, 2013.


                   LEGISLATION REPORTED TO THE HOUSE


    H.R. 1417 (S. 683)._Border Security Results Act of 2013. To 
require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a 
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control 
of the international borders of the United States, and for 
other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Apr. 9, 2013. 
Reported amended May 20, 2013; Rept. 113-87.
    H.R. 1791._Medical Preparedness Allowable Use Act. To amend 
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 
existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security 
Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding 
for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and 
mass prophylaxis capabilities. Referred to Homeland Security 
Apr. 26, 2013. Committee ordered reported Oct. 29, 2013. 
Reported amended Nov. 21, 2013; Rept. 113-273.
    H.R. 3107._Homeland Security Cybersecurity Boots-on-the-
Ground Act To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to 
establish cybersecurity occupation classifications, assess the 
cybersecurity workforce, develop a strategy to address 
identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce, and for other 
purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Sep. 17, 2013. 
Committee ordered reported Oct. 29, 2013. Reported amended Dec. 
12, 2013; Rept. 113-294.


            LEGISLATION ORDERED TO BE REPORTED TO THE HOUSE


    H.R. 2952._CIRDA Act of 2013. To amend the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 to make certain improvements in the laws 
relating to the advancement of security technologies for 
critical infrastructure protection, and for other purposes. 
Referred to Homeland Security Aug. 1, 2013. Committee ordered 
reported Oct. 29, 2013.
                              APPENDIX VI

    Executive Communications, Memorials, Petitions and Presidential 
                                Messages

                        EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

Executive Communication 651
      March 11, 2013--Letter from Acting Chief Privacy Officer, 
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's 
Privacy Office's report entitled, ``2012 Data Mining Report to 
Congress'', pursuant to Pub. L. 110-53 (121 Stat. 266).

Executive Communication 2178
      June 28, 2013--Letter from Chief, Border Security 
Regulations Branch, Department of Homeland Security, 
transmitting the Department's final rule-Extension of Border 
Zone in the State of New Mexico [Docket No.: USCBP-2012-0030] 
(RIN: 1651-AA95) received June 10, 2013, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 3765
      November 19, 2013--A letter from the Chief Privacy 
Officer, Department of Homeland Security, transmitting a report 
entitled, ``DHS Privacy Office 2013 Annual Report to 
Congress''.

Executive Communication 3782
      November 20, 2013--A letter from the Chief, Border 
Security Regulations Branch, Department of Homeland Security, 
transmitting the Department's final rule--Technical Corrections 
Relating to the Procedures for the Production or Disclosure of 
Information in State or Local Criminal Proceedings [CBP Dec. 
13-18] received November 18, 2013, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A).

                              ----------                              


                               MEMORIALS

Memorial 38
      May 24, 2013--Memorial of the General Assembly of the 
State of California, relative to Assembly Joint Resolution No. 
4 urging the federal government to fund necessary improvements 
at the San Ysidro, Calexico, and Otay Mesa Ports of Entry.

Memorial 39
      May 24, 2013--Memorial of the General Assembly of the 
State of California, relative to Assembly Joint Resolution No. 
4 urging the federal government to fund necessary improvements 
at the San Ysidro, Calexico, and Otay Mesa Ports of Entry.

Memorial 119
      July 31, 2013--Memorial of the Senate of the State of 
Louisiana, relative to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 119 
memorializing Congress to establish a task force to study and 
make recommendations relative to implementation of the Federal 
REAL ID Act of 2005 in Louisiana.

                              ----------                              


                         PRESIDENTIAL MESSAGES


Presidential Message 8
      April 24, 2013--Communication from the President of the 
United States, transmitting the Administration's 2013 National 
Drug Control Strategy, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1504.
                              APPENDIX VII

                            Committee Staff

                             MAJORITY STAFF

Greg Hill, Chief of Staff
Paul Anstine, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Border and 
        Maritime Security
Jennifer Arangio, Sr. Counsel
Diana Bergwin, Professional Staff Member
Kate Bonvechio, Professional Staff Member
Mandy Bowers, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism 
        and Intelligence
Luke Burke, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Robert Carretta, Advisor for Transportation Security / DHS 
        Reauthorization
Alan Carroll, Professional Staff Member
Ryan Consaul, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Oversight and 
        Management Efficiency
April Corbett, Press Secretary / Director of Digital Media
Brett DeWitt, Sr. Advisor for Cybersecurity
Laura Fullerton, Sr. Advisor for Strategy and Coalitions
Tina Garcia, Staff Assistant
Michael Geffroy, Deputy Chief of Staff / Chief Counsel
Steven Giaier, Parliamentarian / Counsel
Nicole Halavik, Professional Staff Member
Eric Heighberger, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Emergency 
        Preparedness, Response, and Communications
Deborah Jordan, Subcommittee Clerk
Joshua Katz, Advisor
Kerry Kinirons, Sr. Counsel
Kyle Klein, Professional Staff Member
Tom Leonard, Advisor for Border Security
Alex Manning, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, 
        Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies
Natalie Matson, Staff Assistant
Dirk Maurer, Counsel
Kyle McFarland, Assistant Security Director
Jason Miller, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Margaret Anne Moore, Special Assistant / Press Assistant
James Murphy, Professional Staff Member
John Neal, Professional Staff Member
Joan O'Hara, Deputy Chief Counsel
R. Nicholas Palarino, Deputy Chief of Staff Member / Policy
Amanda Parikh, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Transportation 
        Security
Meghann Peterlin, Sr. Professional Staff Member / Security 
        Director
Erik Peterson, Staff Assistant
Michael Rosen, Sr. Advisor
Bradley Saull, Professional Staff Member
Charlotte Sellmeyer, Communications Director
Dennis Terry, Subcommittee Clerk
Jake Vreeburg, Deputy Parliamentarian

                             MINORITY STAFF

I. Lanier Avant, Staff Director
Moira Bergin, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Cherri Branson, Chief Counsel for Oversight
Rosaline Cohen, Chief Counsel for Legislation
Adam M. Comis, Communications Director
Shante Gauthier, Executive Assistant
Hope Goins, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence 
        Director and Counsel
Claytrice Henderson, Legislative Assistant
Cory Horton, Professional Staff Member
Nicole Wade Johnson, Office Manager
Deborah R. Mack, Professional Staff Member
Alison B. Northrop, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime 
        Security Director
K. Christopher Schepis, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Tamla T. Scott, Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
        Efficiencies Director
Nicole Tisdale, Sr. Professional Staff Member / Counsel
Brian B. Turbyfill, Subcommittee on Transportation Security 
        Director
Shaun West, Professional Staff Member

                         SHARED COMMITTEE STAFF

Dawn M. Criste, Chief Financial Officer 
Michael S.Twinchek, Chief Clerk 
Natalie Nixon, Deputy Chief Clerk / Administrator 
Heather Crowell, GPO Detailee, Printer 


                         FORMER MAJORITY STAFF

Ellen Carlin, Professional Staff
Kevin Carroll, Sr. Counsel
Kevin Gundersen, Sr. Professional Staff
Zach Harris, Assistant Security Director / Professional Staff
Michael McAdams, Deputy Press Secretary
James Meek, Advisor for Counterterrorism
Krista Powers, Professional Staff
Mary Rose Rooney, Professional Staff Member
Monica Sanders, Sr. Counsel /Investigator
Michael Spierto, Professional Staff Member
Kerry Ann Watkins, Staff Director, Subcommittee on 
        Counterterrorism and Intelligence

                         FORMER MINORITY STAFF

Hillary Anderson, Research Assistant
Pizza Ashby, Professional Staff Member
Curtis Brown, Professional Staff Member
Synarus Greene, Professional Staff Member
Marisela Salayandia, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Charles Snyder, Professional Staff Member
                             APPENDIX VIII

                               Witnesses

                              ----------                              


                                 -- A --

Adamski, Shayne, Senior Manager of Digital Engagement, Federal 
        Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Ahern, Jayson, Principal, Chertoff Group.
      LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and 
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Alden, Edward, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow, Council on 
        Foreign Relations.
      LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and 
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Allen, Thad, (ADM, Ret.), Senior Vice President, Booz Allen 
        Hamilton.
      LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to 
the Homeland.''
Ashwood, Albert, Chairman, NEMA Legislative Committee, 
        Director, Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management, 
        Testifying on behalf of the National Emergency 
        Management Association.
      LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Astrue, Michael, Former Social Security Commissioner, Former 
        U.S.Department of Health and Human Services General 
        Counsel.
      LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans' 
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability 
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''

                                 -- B --

Barfi, Barak, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
      LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the 
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
Beckerman, Michael, President and CEO, The Internet 
        Association.
      LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Bejtlich, Richard, Chief Security Officer and Security Services 
        Architect, Mandiant.
      LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China, 
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
Benda, Paul, Director, Advanced Research Projects Agency, 
        Science & Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving 
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
Bercerra, Xavier, a Representative in Congress from the 34th 
        District, State of California.
      LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and 
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Berman, Ilan, Vice President, American Foreign Policy Council.
      LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China, 
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
      LOME, July 9, 2013, ``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's 
Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere.''
Berrick, Cathleen, Managing Director, Homeland Security and 
        Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office.
      LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How 
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''
      LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and 
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices 
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Berteau, David J., Senior Vice President and Director, 
        International Security Program, Center for Strategic 
        and International Studies.
      LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices: 
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private 
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Bhimani, Anish B., Chairman, Financial Services Information 
        Sharing and Analysis Center.
      LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and 
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical 
Infrastructure.''
Biddle, Stephen, PAdjunct Senior Fellow for Defense Policy, 
        Council on Foreign Relations.
      LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications 
for Homeland Security.''
Blanchard, Lauren Ploch, Specialist in African Affairs, 
        Congressional Research Service, The Library of 
        Congress.
      LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How 
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the 
Homeland.''
Blank, Jonah, PhD., Senior Political Analyst, The RAND 
        Corporation.
      LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks 
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Borer, David A., General Counsel, American Federation of 
        Government Employees.
      LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Borkowski, Mark, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Technology 
        Innovation and Acquisition, U.S. Customs and Border 
        Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand 
the State of Border Security.''
Borras, Rafael, Under Secretary for Management, U.S. Department 
        of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on 
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
      LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices: 
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private 
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Bowen, Mark, Sheriff, Hamilton County, Indiana.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Braniff, Bill, Executive Director, National Consortium for the 
        Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism , 
        University of Maryland.
      LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate 
with the American People?''
Browne, Christopher U., Airport Manager, Washington Dulles 
        International Airport, testifying on behalf of the 
        American Association of Airport Executives.
      LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''

                                 -- C --

Caine, Virginia, Dr., Director, Public Health Administration, 
        Marion County (IN) Public Health Department.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Caldwell, Stephen L., Director, Homeland Security and Justice, 
        U.S. Government Accountability Office.
      LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: 
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Callahan, Mary Ellen, Partner, Jenner & Block and Former Chief 
        Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LCIPST, Apr. 25, 2013, ``Striking the Right Balance: 
Protecting Our Nation's Critical Infrastructure from Cyber 
Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
Cardenas, Jorge L., Vice President, Asset Management and 
        Centralized Services, Public Service Enterprise Group, 
        Inc.
      LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Chao, Henry, Deputy Chief Information Officer, Deputy Director 
        of the Office of Information Services, Centers for 
        Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of 
        Health and Human Services.
      LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, 
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing 
Apparatus.''
Chung, Luke, President, FMS, Inc.
      LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure 
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed 
Healthcare.gov?''
Cilluffo, Frank J., Director, Homeland Security Policy 
        Institute and Co-Director, Cyber Center for National 
        and Economic Security, The George Washington 
        University.
      LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China, 
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
      LCTI, Sep. 18, 2013, ``Understanding the Threat to the 
Homeland from AQAP.''
Cohen, John, Deputy Counterterrorism Coordinator and Senior 
        Advisor to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LFULL, Jul. 11, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the 
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Cole, Leonard, Dr., Newark, New Jersey.
      LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, 
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the 
Homeland.''
Commodore, Shene, Government Contracts & Business Manager, 
        Intertek, testifying on behalf of the Security Industry 
        Association.
      LTS, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA 
Acquisition Reform.''
Cornyn, John, Senator, State of Texas.
      LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and 
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Correa, Soraya, Associate Director, Enterprise Services 
        Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure 
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed 
Healthcare.gov?''

                                 -- D --

Daddario, Richard, Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism, 
        New York City Police Department.
      LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, 
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the 
Homeland.''
Daly, Kay, Assistant Inspector General, Audit Services, U.S. 
        Department of
Health and Human Services.
      LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans' 
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability 
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''
Davis, Edward F., III, Commissioner, Boston Police Department.
      LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First 
Look.''
DeFrancis, Suzanne C., Chief Public Affairs Officer, American 
        Red Cross.
      LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Derig, Paul, Environmental Health and Safety Manger III, J.R. 
        Simplot Company, testifying on behalf of the 
        Agricultural Retailers Association.
      LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: 
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Dicken, John, Director, Health Care, U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office.
      LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, 
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing 
Apparatus.''
Dinkins, James, Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security 
        Investigations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How 
Secure is America?''
Dippel, Donnie, President, Texas Ag Industries Association.
      LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: 
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Duncan, Alan R., Assistant Inspector General for Security and 
        Information Technology Services, Inspector General for 
        Tax Administration, Department of the Treasury.
      LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, 
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing 
Apparatus.''
Dunlap, Ken, Global Director, Security & Travel Facilitation, 
        International Air Transport Association.
      LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Durkovich, Caitlin, Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure 
        Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 
        testifying on behalf of the Interagency Security 
        Committee.
      LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications 
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''

                                 -- E --

Edwards, Charles K., Deputy Inspector General, Office of 
        Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LOME, Mar. 19, 2013, ``DHS Information Technology: How 
Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and 
Uphold Immigration Laws?''
      LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving 
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
      LCIPST, May 16 2013, ``Facilitating Cyber Threat 
Information Sharing and Partnering with the Private Sector to 
Protect Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS 
Capabilities.''
      LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial 
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
English, Charley, Director, Georgia Emergency Management 
        Agency, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency 
        Management Association.
      LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response: 
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.''
Ervin, Clark Kent, Partner, Patton Boggs, LLP.
      LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to 
the Homeland.''
Escobar, Veronica, El Paso County Judge, El Paso, Texas.
      LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand 
the State of Border Security.''

                                 -- F --

Fair, C. Christine, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Georgetown 
        University, Security Studies Program in the Edumnd A. 
        Walsh School of Foreign Service.
      LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks 
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Falconer, Dolan P., Jr., Co - Founder, Chairman & General 
        Manger, Scan Tech Holdings.
      LTS, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA 
Acquisition Reform.''
Farah, Douglas, President, IBI Consultants.
      LOME, July 9, 2013, ``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's 
Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere.''
Farrell, Brenda S., Director, Defense Capabilities and 
        Management, Military and DOD Civilian Personnel Issues, 
        U.S. Government Accountability Office.
      LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland 
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance 
Processes.''
Fisher, Eric A., PhD, Senior Specialist, Science and 
        Technology, Congressional Research Service, Library of 
        Congress.
      LCIPST, Jul. 18, 2013, ``Oversight of Executive Order 
13636 and Development of the Cybersecurity Framework.''
Fisher, Michael J., Chief, Border Patrol, Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand 
the State of Border Security.''
      LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look 
Like?''
Freeman, Geoff, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice 
        President, U.S. Travel Association.
      LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Fulghum, Chip, Acting Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Department 
        of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Nov. 15, 2013, ``DHS Financial Management: 
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.''

                                 -- G --

Gambler, Rebecca, Director, Homeland Security and Justice 
        Issues, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
      LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look 
Like?''
      LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How 
Secure is America?''
      LBMS, Sep. 26, 2013, ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission 
Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.''
Gerstein, Daniel, Deputy Under Secretary, Science and 
        Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial 
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
Ghilarducci, Mark, Director, California Governor's Office of 
        Emergency Services, testifying on behalf of the 
        National Governors Association and the Governors 
        Homeland Security Advisors Council.
      LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of 
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Gilmore, James, III, President, Free Congress Foundation.
      LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How 
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''
Giuliani, Rudolph ``Rudy'' W., former Mayor, New York City.
      LFULL, Jul. 10, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the 
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Goldstein, Mark, Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues, U.S. 
        Government Accountability Office.
      LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications 
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''
Gowadia, Huban, Dr. Acting Director, Domestic Nuclear Detection 
        Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, 
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the 
Homeland.''
Graves, Margaret H., Deputy Chief Information Officer, U.S. 
        Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Mar. 19, 2013, ``DHS Information Technology: How 
Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and 
Uphold Immigration Laws?''
Greenwalt, William C., Visiting Fellow, Marilyn Ware Center for 
        Security Studies, American Enterprise Institute.
      LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices: 
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private 
Sector Lessons Learned.''

                                 -- H --

Halinski, John, Deputy Administrator, Transportation Security 
        Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on 
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
      LOME & TS, July 31, 2013, ``TSA Integrity Challenges: 
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.''
Hayes, Gary W., Chief Information Officer, Centerpoint Energy.
      LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and 
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical 
Infrastructure.''
Henry, Shawn, President, CrowdStrike Services.
      LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to 
the Homeland.''
Hill, John, Executive Director, Indiana Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Hoffman, Bruce, Professor and Director, Center for Peace and 
        Security Studies and Security, Georgetown University.
      LFULL, Jul. 10, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the 
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Humire, Joseph M., Executive Director, Center for a Secure Free 
        Society.
      LOME, July 9, 2013, ``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's 
Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere.''

                               -- I, J --

Jensen, Robert, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of 
        Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate 
with the American People?''
Jones, Seth G., Ph.D., Associate Director, International 
        Security and Defense Policy Center.
      LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the 
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
Joscelyn, Thomas, Senior Fellow, Foundation for the Defense of 
        Democracies.
      LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the 
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
      LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications 
for Homeland Security.''
Judd, Brandon, President, National Border Patrol Council.
      LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on 
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''

                                 -- K --

Katulis, Brian, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
      LCTI, Sep. 18, 2013, ``Understanding the Threat to the 
Homeland from AQAP.''
Kelley, Colleen M., National President, The National Treasury 
        Employees Union.
      LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications 
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''
Kessler, Tamara, Acting Officer for Civil Rights and Civil 
        Liberties, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate 
with the American People?''
Khan, Asif, Director, Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. 
        Government.
      LOME, Nov. 15, 2013, ``DHS Financial Management: 
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer 
Dollars.''Accountability Office.
Kierce, W. Greg, Sgt. Director, Jersey City Office of 
        Emergency, Management and Homeland Security.
      LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Killough, Craig, Vice President, Organization Markets, Project 
        Management Institute.
      LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and 
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices 
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Knight, H. Clifton, Chief Medical Officer, Community Health 
        Network.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Kolasky, Richard, Director, Implementation Task Force, National 
        Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LCIPST, Jul. 18, 2013, ``Oversight of Executive Order 
13636 and Development of the Cybersecurity Framework.''
Kostro, Stephanie Sanok, Senior Fellow and Acting Director, 
        Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Program, Center 
        for Strategic and International Studies.
      LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How 
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the 
Homeland.''
Krush, Waylon, Chief Executive Officer, Lunarline, Inc.
      LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure 
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed 
Healthcare.gov?''

                                 -- L --

Lee, William D., Rear Admiral, Deputy For Operations Policy and 
        Capabilities, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look 
Like?''
Leiter, Michael E., Former Director, National Counterterrorism 
        Center.
      LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to 
the Homeland.''
      LFULL, Jul. 10, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the 
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Libicki, Martin C., Senior Management Scientist, RAND 
        Corporation.
      LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China, 
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
Lieberman, Joseph I., former Senator from the State of 
        Connecticut.
      LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First 
Look.''
Lord, Stephen M., Director, Forensic Audits and Investigative 
        Services, Government Accountability Office.
      LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving 
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
      LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: 
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
      LOME & TS, July 31, 2013, ``TSA Integrity Challenges: 
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.''
      LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial 
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
Lovegrove, Brett, Chief Executive, City Security and Resilience 
        Network (CSARN).
      LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How 
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the 
Homeland.''
Lute, Jane Holl, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and 
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical 
Infrastructure.''
Lyon, Shonnie, Acting Director, Office of Biometric Identity 
        Management, National Protection and Programs 
        Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How 
Secure is America?''

                                 -- M --

Mack. Diane, University Director, Emergency Management and 
        Continuity, Indiana University.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Mackin, Michele, Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management, 
        U.S. Government Accountability Office.
      LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices: 
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private 
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Manning, Timothy, Deputy Administrator, Protection and National 
        Preparedness, Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. 
        Department of Homeland Security.
      LEPRC, Mar. 19, 2013, ``Homeland Security Grants: 
Measuring Our Investments.''
      LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of 
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Marshall, Gregory, Chief Security Officer, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications 
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''
      LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland 
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance 
Processes.''
Maurer, David C., Director, Homeland Security and Justice 
        Issues, Government Accountability Office.
      LEPRC, Mar. 19, 2013, ``Homeland Security Grants: 
Measuring Our Investments.''
      LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications 
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''
McAleenan, Kevin, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of 
        Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look 
Like?''
      LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand 
the State of Border Security.''
McAllister, Scott, Deputy Under Secretary, State and Local 
        Program Officer, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, 
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the 
Homeland.''
McGuire, Cheri F., Vice President, Global Government Affairs & 
        Cybersecurity Policy, Symantec.
      LCIPST, Apr. 25, 2013, ``Striking the Right Balance: 
Protecting Our Nation's Critical Infrastructure from Cyber 
Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
Mellor, Richard, Vice President, Loss Prevention, National 
        Retail Federation.
      LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How 
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the 
Homeland.''
Milholland, Terence V., Chief Technology Officer, Internal 
        Revenue Service.
      LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, 
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing 
Apparatus.''
Miller, Merton W., Associate Director of Investigations, 
        Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of 
        Personnel Management.
      LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland 
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance 
Processes.''
Misztal, Blaise Acting Director of Foreign Policy, Bipartisan 
        Policy Center
Molitor, Paul, Assistant Vice President, National Electrical 
        Manufacturers Association.
      LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response: 
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.''
Moulton, Sean, Director, Open Government Policy, Center for 
        Effective Government.
      LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: 
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Mullen, Michael C., Executive Director, Express Association of 
        America.
      LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''

                                 -- N --

Napolitano, Janet, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LFULL, Apr. 18, 2013, ``The President's FY 2014 Budget 
Request for the Department of Homeland Security.''
Nelson, Rick ``Ozzie'', Vice President for Business 
        Development, Cross Match Technologies.
      LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How 
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''

                                 -- O --

Obeime, Mercy, Dr., Director, Community and Global Health, 
        Franciscan St. Francis Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Olsen, Matthew G., Director, National Counterterrorism Center.
      LFULL, 11, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the Homeland: 
From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Orgeron, Craig, Chief Information Officer and Executive 
        Director, Department of Information Technology 
        Services, State of Mississippi, testifying on behalf of 
        the National Association of State Chief Information 
        Officers.
      LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response: 
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.''
Orusa, Steven, Fire Chief, Fishers, Indiana.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Outten-Mills, Deborah, Acting Assistant Inspector General for 
        Inspections, Office of Inspector General, U.S. 
        Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME & TS, July 31, 2013, ``TSA Integrity Challenges: 
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.''

                                 -- P --

Parente, Stephen T., Ph.D., Minnesota Insurance Industry Chair 
        of Health Finance, Director, Medical Industry 
        Leadership Institute and Professor, Department of 
        Finance, Carlson School of Management, University of 
        Minnesota.
      LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans' 
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability 
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''
Patterson, L. Eric, Director, Federal Protective Service, U.S. 
        Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications 
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''
Payne, Jason Matthew, Philanthropy Lead, Palantir Technologies.
      LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Pearl, Marc, President & CEO, Homeland Security & Defense 
        Business Council.
      LTS, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA 
Acquisition Reform.''
Pearson, Harriet, Partner, Hogan Lovells.
      LCIPST, Apr. 25, 2013, ``Striking the Right Balance: 
Protecting Our Nation's Critical Infrastructure from Cyber 
Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
Pfeifer, Joseph W., Chief of Counterterrorism and Emergency 
        Preparedness, Fire Department of New York.
      LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks 
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Pinkerton, Sharon L., Senior Vice President, Legislative and 
        Regulatory Policy, Airlines for America.
      LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Pinkham, Doug, President, Public Affairs Council.
      LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate 
with the American People?''
Pistole, John S., Administrator, Transportation Security 
        Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LTS, Mar. 14, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security.''
      LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial 
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
Powner, David, Director, Information Technology Management 
        Issues, Government Accountability Office.
      LOME, Mar. 19, 2013, ``DHS Information Technology: How 
Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and 
Uphold Immigration Laws?''
Priest, Chad, Chief Executive Officer, MESH Coalition, Inc.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Prioletti, Brian, Assistant Director, Special Security 
        Directorate, National Counterintelligence Executive, 
        Office of Director of National Intelligence.
      LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland 
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance 
Processes.''
Profeta, Louis, M.D., F.A.C.E.P., Medical Director of Disaster 
        Preparedness, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, 
        Indiana.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''

                               -- Q, R --

Ragsdale, Daniel H., Deputy Director, Immigration and Customs 
        Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on 
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
Reed, R. Lawrence, II, M.D., F.A.C.S., F.C.C., Director of 
        Trauma Services, Indiana University Health Methodist 
        Hospital.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Reese, Shawn, Analyst, Emergency Management and Homeland 
        Security Policy, Congressional Research Service, 
        Library of Congress.
      LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How 
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''
Richards, Anne L., Assistant Inspector General for Audits, 
        Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LEPRC, Mar. 19, 2013, ``Homeland Security Grants: 
Measuring Our Investments.''
      LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and 
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices 
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
      LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices: 
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private 
Sector Lessons Learned.''
      LOME, Nov. 15, 2013, ``DHS Financial Management: 
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.''
Richardson, Michelle, Legislative Counsel, American Civil 
        Liberties Union.
      LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and 
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical 
Infrastructure.''
Ridge, Tom J., Former Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 
        Security.
      LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications 
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''
Romine, Charles H., PhD, Director, Information Technology 
        Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and 
        Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
      LCIPST, Jul. 18, 2013, ``Oversight of Executive Order 
13636 and Development of the Cybersecurity Framework.''
Rosenblum, Marc R., PhD, Specialist in Immigration Policy, 
        Congressional Research Service, The Library of 
        Congress.
      LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look 
Like?''

                                 -- S --

Sadler, Steve, Assistant Administrator, Office of Intelligence 
        and Analysis, Transportation Security Administration, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: 
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
Salo, Matt, Executive Director, National Association of 
        Medicaid Directors.
      LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans' 
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability 
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''
Scales, Robert H., Jr. (Major General, Ret. U.S. Army), former 
        Commandant of the U.S. Army War College.
      LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications 
for Homeland Security.''
Schueur, Michael, Adjunct Professor, Center for Peace and 
        Security Studies, Georgetown University.
      LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How 
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the 
Homeland.''
Schwartz, James H., Fire Chief, Arlington County Fire 
        Department, Arlington, Virginia, testifying on behalf 
        of the International Association of Fire Chiefs
Schwartz, Kurt N., Undersecretary, Executive Office of Public 
        Safety and Security, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
      LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First 
Look.''
Scott, Timothy J., Chief Security Officer, Corporate Director, 
        Emergency Services and Security, The Dow Chemical 
        Company.
      LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: 
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Sena, Mike, Deputy Director, Northern California Regional 
        Intelligence Center, testifying on behalf of the 
        National Fusion Center Association.
      LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response: 
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.''
Servidio, Joseph A., Rear Admiral, Assistant Commandant for 
        Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: 
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
Shays, Christopher, Former Representative in Congress from the 
        4th District of Connecticut.
      LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications 
for Homeland Security.''
Simcox, Robin, Research Fellow, The Henry Jackson Society.
      LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the 
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
Soloway, Stan, President and CEO, Professional Services 
        Council.
      LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices: 
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private 
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Southers, Erroll G., Professor and Associate Director of 
        Research Transition, DHS National Center for Risk & 
        Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), Sol 
        Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern 
        California.
      LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First 
Look.''
Spangller, Kathy, Vice President, U.S. Programs, Save the 
        Children.
      LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of 
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Stana, Richard M., Former Director, Homeland Security and 
        Justice, Government Accountability Office.
      LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and 
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Stanek, Richard W., Sheriff, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
      LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How 
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the 
Homeland.''
Stempfley, Roberta ``Bobbie'', Acting Assistant Secretary, 
        Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National 
        Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LCIPST, May 16 2013, ``Facilitating Cyber Threat 
Information Sharing and Partnering with the Private Sector to 
Protect Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS 
Capabilities.''
      LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response: 
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency 
Management.''
      LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure 
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed 
Healthcare.gov?''
Stepka, Matthew, Vice President, Technology for Social Impact, 
        Google.org.
      LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How 
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness, 
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Stern, Paul G., PhD., Board Director, Business Executives for 
        National Security.
      LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and 
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices 
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Stier, Max, President and CEO, Partnership for Public Service.
      LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications 
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''

                                 -- T --

Tankel, Stephen, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, American 
        University and Nonresident Scholar, South Asia Program, 
        Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
      LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks 
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Tavenner, Marilyn B., Administrator, Centers for Medicare and 
        Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human 
        Services.
      LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, 
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing 
Apparatus.''

                               -- U, V --

Velasquez, Andrew, III, Regional Administrator, FEMA Region 5, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing 
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''

                                 -- W --

Wagner, John, Acting Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of 
        Field Operations, Customs and Border Protection, U.S. 
        Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How 
Secure is America?''
      LBMS, Sep. 26, 2013, ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission 
Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.''
Walker, David M., Founder and CEO, The Comeback America 
        Initiative.
      LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to 
the Homeland.''
Walker, Jeffrey W., Senior Emergency Manager, Licking County, 
        Ohio, testifying on behalf of the International 
        Association of Emergency Managers.
      LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of 
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Waters, Karen Shelton, Assistant Administrator, Office of 
        Acquisition, Transportation Security Administration, 
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving 
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
Werfel, Danny, Principal Deputy Commissioner, Internal Revenue 
        Service.
      LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and 
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, 
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing 
Apparatus.''
Willis, Henry H., PhD., Director, RAND Homeland Security and 
        Defense Center.
      LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and 
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices 
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Winkowski, Thomas S., Deputy Commissioner, Performing the 
        duties of the Commissioner, Customs and Border 
        Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on 
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
Woodring, Marcus, [Captain, USCG (ret)], Managing Director, 
        Health, Safety, Security and Environmental, Port of 
        Houston Authority.
      LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: 
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
Woods, John, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs 
        Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LBMS, Sep. 26, 2013, ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission 
Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.''
Wulf, David, ISCD Director, National Protection and Programs 
        Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
      LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: 
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''

                              -- X, Y, Z --

Zelvin, Larry, Director, National Cybersecurity and 
        Communications Integration Center, U.S. Department of 
        Homeland Security.
      LCIPST, May 16 2013, ``Facilitating Cyber Threat 
Information Sharing and Partnering with the Private Sector to 
Protect Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS 
Capabilities.''
Zimmerman, Katherine, Senior Analyst Critical Threats Project, 
        The American Enterprise Institute.
      LCTI, Sep. 18, 2013, ``Understanding the Threat to the 
Homeland from AQAP.''
                              APPENDIX IX

                          Printed Hearings\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ FULL -- Full Committee; CTI -- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism 
and Intelligence; BMS -- Border and Maritime Security; CIPST -- 
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security 
Technologies; OME -- Subcommittee on Oversight and Management 
Efficiency; TS -- Subcommittee on Transportation Security; EPRC -- 
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications
      Number                     Title                       Date113-1               ``A New Perspective on Threats   February 13, 2013
                     to the Homeland.''
                    FULL113-2               ``Assessing DHS 10 Years Later:  February 15, 2013
                     How Wisely is DHS Spending
                     Taxpayer Dollars?''
                    OME113-3               ``What Does a Secure Border      February 26, 2013
                     Look Like?''
                    BMS113-4               ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and   March 13, 2013
                     Responsibilities to Protect
                     the Nation's Critical
                     Infrastructure.''
                    FULL113-5               ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk- March 14, 2013
                     Based Security.''
                    TS113-6               ``Homeland Security Grants:      March 19, 2013
                     Measuring Our Investments.''
                    EPRC113-7               ``DHS Information Technology:    March 19, 2013
                     How Effectively Has DHS
                     Harnessed IT To Secure Our
                     Borders and Uphold Immigration
                     Laws?''
                    OME113-8               ``Measuring Outcomes to          March 20, 2013
                     Understand the State of Border
                     Security.''
                    BMS113-9               ``Cyber Threats from China,      March 20, 2013
                     Russia and Iran: Protecting
                     American Critical
                     Infrastructure.''
                    CIPST113-10              ``The Impact of Sequestration    April 12, 2013
                     on Homeland Security: Scare
                     Tactics or Possible Threat?''
                    OME113-11              ``The President's FY 2014        April 18, 2013
                     Budget Request for the
                     Department of Homeland
                     Security.''
                    FULL113-12              ``Counterterrorism Efforts to    April 25, 2013
                     Combat a Chemical, Biological,
                     Radiological, and Nuclear
                     (CBRN) Attack on the
                     Homeland.''
                    CTI113-13              ``Striking the Right Balance:    April 25, 2013
                     Protecting Our Nation's
                     Critical Infrastructure from
                     Cyber Attack and Ensuring
                     Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
                    CIPST113-14              ``Cutting DHS Duplication and    April 26, 2013
                     Wasteful Spending:
                     Implementing Private Sector
                     Best Practices and Watchdog
                     Recommendations.''
                    OME113-15              ``TSA Procurement Reform:        May 8, 2013
                     Saving Taxpayer Dollars
                     Through Smarter Spending
                     Practices.''
                    TS113-16              ``The Boston Bombings: A First   May 9, 2013
                     Look.''
                    FULL113-17              ``Facilitating Cyber Threat      May 16, 2013
                     Information Sharing and
                     Partnering with the Private
                     Sector to Protect Critical
                     Infrastructure: An Assessment
                     of DHS Capabilities.''
                    CIPST113-18              ``Visa Security and Overstays:   May 21, 2013
                     How Secure is America?''
                    BMS113-19              ``Assessing the Threat to the    May 22, 2013
                     Homeland from al Qaeda
                     Operations in Iran and
                     Syria.''
                    CTI113-20              ``Emergency MGMT 2.0:            ...................
                    ``How #SocialMedia & New Tech    June 4, 2013
                     are Transforming Preparedness,  ...................
                     Response, & Recovery            ...................
                     #Disasters #Part1               July 9, 2013
                     #Privatesector.''
                    ``How #SocialMedia & New Tech
                     are Transforming Preparedness,
                     Response, & Recovery
                     #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/
                     NGOs.''
                    EPRC113-21              ``Protecting the Homeland        June 12, 2013
                     Against Mumbai-Style Attacks
                     and the Threat from Lashkar-e-
                     Taiba.''
                    CTI113-22              ``Why Can't DHS Better           June 14, 2013
                     Communicate with the American
                     People?''
                    OME113-23              ``Threat, Risk and               June 18, 2013
                     Vulnerability: The Future of
                     the TWIC Program.''
                    BMS113-24              ``Threat to the Homeland:        July 9, 2013
                     Iran's Extending Influence in
                     the Western Hemisphere.''
                    OME113-25              ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,  July 17, 2013
                     and Fraud Concerns with
                     ObamaCare's Information
                     Sharing Apparatus.''
                    CIPST Joint with the Committee
                     on Oversight and Government
                     Reform Subcommittee on Energy
                     Policy, Health Care and
                     Entitlements113-26              ``Stakeholder Perspectives on    July 17, 2013
                     TSA Acquisition Reform.''
                    TS113-27              ``Oversight of Executive Order   July 18, 2013
                     13636 and Development of the
                     Cybersecurity Framework.''
                    CIPST113-28              ``A Study in Contrasts: House    July 23, 2013
                     and Senate Approaches to
                     Border Security.''
                    BMS113-29              ``TSA Integrity Challenges:      July 31, 2013
                     Examining Misconduct by
                     Airport Security Personnel.''
                    OME & TS113-30              ``West Fertilizer, Off the       August 1, 2013
                     Grid: The Problem of
                     Unidentified Chemical
                     Facilities.''
                    CIPST113-31              ``Assessing Central Indiana's    August 6, 2013
                     Preparedness for a Mass         Carmel, Indiana
                     Casualty Event''
                    EPRC113-32              ``Crisis in Syria: Implications  September 10, 2013
                     for Homeland Security.''
                    FULL113-33              ``The Threat to Americans'       September 11, 2013
                     Personal Information: A Look
                     into the Security and
                     Reliability of the Health
                     Exchange Data Hub.''
                    CIPST113-34              ``Understanding the Threat to    September 18, 2013
                     the Homeland from AQAP.''
                    CTI113-35              ``Assessing the Nation's State   September 19, 2013
                     of Preparedness: A Federal,
                     State, and Local
                     Perspective.''
                    EPRC113-36              ``DHS Acquisition Practices:     September 19, 2013
                     Improving Outcomes for
                     Taxpayers Using Defense and
                     Private Sector Lessons
                     Learned.''
                    OME113-37              ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11          September 26, 2013
                     Commission Recommendation:
                     Implementing Biometric Exit.''
                    BMS113-38              ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra:   October 9, 2013
                     How Westerners Joining Terror
                     Groups Overseas Affect the
                     Homeland.''
                    FULL113-39              ``Cyber Incident Response:       October 30, 2013
                     Bridging the Gap Between
                     Cybersecurity and Emergency
                     Management.''
                    EPRC and CIPST113-40              ``Facility Protection:           October 30, 2013
                     Implications of the Navy Yard
                     Shooting on Homeland
                     Security.''
                    OME113-41              ``Cyber Side-Effects: How        November 13, 2013
                     Secure is the Personal
                     Information Entered into the
                     Flawed Healthcare.gov?''
                    FULL113-42              ``The Insider Threat to          November 13, 2013
                     Homeland Security: Examining
                     Our Nation's Security
                     Clearance Processes.''
                    CTI113-43              ``TSA's SPOT Program and         November 14, 2013
                     Initial Lessons From the LAX
                     Shooting.''
                    TS113-44              ``DHS Financial Management:      November 15, 2013
                     Investigating DHS's
                     Stewardship of Taxpayer
                     Dollars.''
                    OME113-45              ``Help Wanted at DHS:            December 12, 2013
                     Implications of Leadership
                     Vacancies on the Mission and
                     Morale.''
                    FULL
                               APPENDIX X

                            Committee Prints

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Number                               Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-A..................................  Rules of the Committee on
                                          Homeland Security for the
                                          113th Congress.------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Additional Views

         ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF RANKING MEMBER BENNIE G. THOMPSON

    During the 113th Congress, Democratic Members of the 
Homeland Security Committee have diligently worked to assure 
that the programs, policies, and practices of the Department of 
Homeland Security are effective and efficient in: safeguarding 
the nation from the terrorist threat; addressing the 
destructive impact of natural disasters; mitigating known and 
unknown vulnerabilities; and ensuring resiliency in the 
operation of both publicly- and privately-owned facilities and 
infrastructures. The Democratic Members are committed to 
protecting the homeland. In the event of a terrorist attack or 
other catastrophic occurrence, the Democratic Members of the 
Committee will work to ensure that the well-being of each 
impacted American is the paramount interest of Congress.
    The work undertaken by the Democratic Members of this 
Committee has taken various forms, including introducing 
legislation, arranging briefings from Administration officials, 
and sending oversight requests to the Department of Homeland 
Security. Most importantly, these efforts have been a 
continuation of work done by the Democratic Majority in the 
110th and 111th Congresses. Despite minority status, Democrats 
have found a way to follow through on our earlier efforts 
designed to protect the American people.
    Under the Rules of the House, Activity Reports are intended 
to reflect a comprehensive review of a Committee's legislative 
and oversight activities. The goal must be to produce a report 
of the highest caliber to inform our constituents--the American 
taxpayer--of the actions we have taken on their behalf.
    Unfortunately, in producing the Activity Report, the 
Majority opted to include meetings and other actions that were 
neither officially noticed under the rules of the House nor 
committee proceedings. The report contains several instances of 
vague, dateless references to meetings between Majority staff 
and external, non-governmental stakeholders. The Minority was 
neither invited to these meetings nor informed of their 
occurrence. These one-party undertakings are referenced in the 
report as ``committee'' activities. While the Committee has 
generally enjoyed bipartisan cooperation, Minority requests 
that these references be changed to reflect their true nature 
were rejected.
    The occurrence of these one-party meetings raises questions 
about the influence these non-governmental stakeholders may 
have had on the work of this Committee. Alternatively, it is 
unclear whether these meetings had any goal or purpose.
    To identify inaccuracies is not intended to raise the 
implication that the actions were taken for partisan reasons. 
Given the nature of many of the events, it is likely that if 
informed, the Minority would have participated.
    However, the reality remains that the Minority was not 
informed. The Activity Report should be an accurate 
representation of Committee's actions. One-party activities 
undertaken without appropriate notice should not be re-defined 
as ``Committee'' activities. The exclusion of the Minority, 
either purposely or unintentionally, makes these events 
ineligible to be considered ``Committee'' activities:
    Below is a sample of the meetings and other events that 
Minority Members and staff were not invited to attend or were 
not officially noticed, and therefore, should not be included 
in the Committee's Activity Report:
    On January 28, 2013, Committee staff attended a roundtable 
to gain stakeholder perspectives on FirstNet and the 
development of the National Public Safety Broadband Network 
(PSBN).
    On February 7-8, 2013, the Chair of the CIPST Subcommittee 
and staff traveled to New York City, New York, to receive 
briefings from representatives of the financial services 
sector.
    On February 22, 2013, Committee staff met with 
representatives of the Office of Emergency Communications to 
discuss the Department of Homeland Security's role on the 
FirstNet board and with the Public Safety Advisory Committee 
(PSAC).
    On February 25, 2013, Committee staff met with the Director 
of Texas A&M University's Foreign and Zoonotic Disease Defense 
(FAZD) Center to receive a briefing of FAZD's biosurveillance 
efforts.
    On March 20, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the 
Subcommittee received an update from the TSA Administrator on 
TSA's Screening Partnership Program.
    On June 19, 2013, the Chair of the OME Subcommittee met 
with the Director of FLETC, to obtain an overview of FLETC's 
operations.
    On August 6, 2013, CIPST Subcommittee staff received a 
briefing from representatives of the Department of Homeland 
Security on the release of a $920 million Request for Proposal 
(RFP) for the Development, Operations and Maintenance of the 
Federal Enterprise Security Network Program.
    On August 14-15, 2013, Committee staff visited Texas A&M 
University to observe homeland security and emergency 
management training programs at the Texas Engineering Extension 
Service and learn about other homeland security programs 
conducted by Texas A&M.
    On October 30, 2013, CIPST Subcommittee staff received a 
briefing from representatives of the Department of Homeland 
Security regarding the progress of the government-wide adoption 
of the $6 billion Continuous Diagnostic and Mitigation Program, 
which will consolidate Federal cybersecurity practices under 
one set of requirements and to ascertain contract awards and 
timelines for deployment.
    The Minority looks forward to continuing a bipartisan and 
cooperative relationship with the Majority and hopes that the 
Second Session of the 113th Congress will not involve one-party 
meetings and events that should rightfully involve Members of 
the Committee, regardless of party affiliation.
    This Committee's mission--safeguarding the nation from the 
terrorist threat; addressing the destructive impact of natural 
disasters; mitigating known and unknown vulnerabilities; and 
ensuring resiliency in the operation of both publicly and 
privately-owned facilities and infrastructures--must not be 
undermined by partisan division.

                                                Bennie G. Thompson.

                                  
