House Report 113-314 - REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES of the HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d))

[House Report 113-314]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress } { Report
1st Session } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { 113-314
_______________________________________________________________________

Union Calendar No. 232

REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES

of the

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

together with

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

(Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d))

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

January 2, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
State of the Union and ordered to be printed

----------
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

39-006 PDF WASHINGTON : 2014

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

----------

House of Representatives,
Committee on Homeland Security,
Washington, DC, January 2, 2014.
Hon. Karen L. Haas,
Clerk of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Ms. Haas: Pursuant to Rule X and clause 1(d)(1) of
Rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, attached,
please find the of the legislative and oversight activities of
the Committee on Homeland Security for the First Session of the
113th Congress.
Sincerely,
Michael T. McCaul,
Chairman.

Union Calendar No. 232
113th Congress } { Report
1st Session } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { 113-314

=======================================================================

LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE
COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

113TH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION (JANUARY -- DECEMBER 2013)

_______

January 2, 2014.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
State of the Union and ordered to be printed

_______

Mr. McCaul, from the Committee on Homeland Security, submitted the
following

R E P O R T

together with

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

Overview

The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2013,
for an organizational meeting for the 113th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Michael T. McCaul of Texas. The Committee
Membership, was set at 32 Members with 18 Republicans and 14
Democrats.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: The
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence; the
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security; the Subcommittee
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security
Technologies; the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiency; the Subcommittee on Transportation Security; and
the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.

CONTENTS

Page
Jurisdiction and Legislative History............................. 3
Membership and Organization...................................... 11
History of the Committee on Homeland Security.................... 13
Full Committee
Legislative Activities....................................... 21
Oversight Activities......................................... 31
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
Legislative Activities....................................... 43
Oversight Activities......................................... 44
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security
Legislative Activities....................................... 53
Oversight Activities......................................... 54
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies
Legislative Activities....................................... 61
Oversight Activities......................................... 63
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency
Oversight Activities......................................... 71
Subcommittee on Transportation Security
Legislative Activities....................................... 85
Oversight Activities......................................... 90
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications
Legislative Activities....................................... 97
Oversight Activities......................................... 98
Committee Oversight Plan
Part A, Oversight Plan As Agreed to.......................... 113
Part B, Implementation of the Oversight Plan................. 129
Appendices
Appendix I--Committee Rules.................................. 153
Appendix II--Membership Changes to the Committee............. 167
Appendix III--List of Public Laws............................ 177
Appendix IV--Committee Legislative Reports................... 179
Appendix V--Status of Legislation Referred to the Committee.. 181
Appendix VI--Executive Communications, Memorials, and
Presidential Messages...................................... 183
Appendix VII--Committee Staff................................ 185
Appendix VIII--Witnesses..................................... 189
Appendix IX--Printed Hearings................................ 205
Appendix X--Committee Prints................................. 209
Additional Views................................................. 211

Jurisdiction and Legislative History

The Committee on Homeland Security was re-established in
the 113th Congress pursuant to H. Res. 5, the Rules of the
House of Representatives for the 113th Congress, agreed to on
January 3, 2013. The jurisdiction of the Committee is as
follows:

HOUSE RULE X

Committees and their legislative jurisdictions

1. There shall be in the House the following standing
committees, each of which shall have the jurisdiction and
related functions assigned by this clause and clauses 2, 3, and
4. All bills, resolutions, and other matters relating to
subjects within the jurisdiction of the standing committees
listed in this clause shall be referred to those committees, in
accordance with clause 2 of rule XII, as follows:

* * * * *

(I) Committee on Homeland Security
(1) Overall homeland security policy.
(j) Committee on Homeland Security.
(1) Overall homeland security policy.
(2) Organization, administration, and general
management of the Department of Homeland Security.
(3) Functions of the Department of Homeland Security
relating to the following:
(A) Border and port security (except immigration
policy and non-border enforcement).
(B) Customs (except customs revenue).
(C) Integration, analysis, and dissemination of
homeland security information.
(D) Domestic preparedness for and collective
response to terrorism.
(E) Research and development.
(F) Transportation security.

* * * * *

General oversight responsibilities

2. (a) The various standing committees shall have general
oversight responsibilities as provided in paragraph (b) in
order to assist the House in
(1) its analysis, appraisal, and evaluation of--
(A) the application, administration,
execution, and effectiveness of Federal laws;
and
(B) conditions and circumstances that may
indicate the necessity or Desirability of
enacting new or additional legislation; and
(2) its formulation, consideration, and enactment of
changes in Federal laws, and of such additional
legislation as may be necessary or appropriate.
(b)(1) In order to determine whether laws and programs
addressing subjects within the jurisdiction of a committee are
being implemented and carried out in accordance with the intent
of Congress and whether they should be continued, curtailed, or
eliminated, each standing committee (other than the Committee
on Appropriations) shall review and study on a continuing
basis--
(A) the application, administration, execution, and
effectiveness of laws and programs addressing subjects
within its jurisdiction;
(B) the organization and operation of Federal
agencies and entities having responsibilities for the
administration and execution of laws and programs
addressing subjects within its jurisdiction;
(C) any conditions or circumstances that may indicate
the necessity or desirability of enacting new or
additional legislation addressing subjects within its
jurisdiction (whether or not a bill or resolution has
been introduced with respect thereto); and
(D) future research and forecasting on subjects
within its jurisdiction.
(2) Each committee to which subparagraph (1) applies having
more than 20 members shall establish an oversight subcommittee,
or require its subcommittees to conduct oversight in their
respective jurisdictions, to assist in carrying out its
responsibilities under this clause. The establishment of an
oversight subcommittee does not limit the responsibility of a
subcommittee with legislative jurisdiction in carrying out its
oversight responsibilities.
(c) Each standing committee shall review and study on a
continuing basis the impact or probable impact of tax policies
affecting subjects within its jurisdiction as described in
clauses 1 and 3.
(d)(1) Not later than February 15 of the first session of a
Congress, each standing committee shall, in a meeting that is
open to the public and with a quorum present, adopt its
oversight plan for that Congress. Such plan shall be submitted
simultaneously to the Committee on Government Reform and to the
Committee on House Administration. In developing its plan each
committee shall, to the maximum extent feasible--
(A) consult with other committees that have
jurisdiction over the same or related laws, programs,
or agencies within its jurisdiction with the objective
of ensuring maximum coordination and cooperation among
committees when conducting reviews of such laws,
programs, or agencies and include in its plan an
explanation of steps that have been or will be taken to
ensure such coordination and cooperation;
(B) review specific problems with Federal rules,
regulations, statutes, and court decisions that are
ambiguous, arbitrary, or nonsensical, or that impose
severe financial burdens on individuals;
(C) give priority consideration to including in its
plan the review of those laws, programs, or agencies
operating under permanent budget authority or permanent
statutory authority;
(D) have a view toward ensuring that all significant
laws, programs, or agencies within its jurisdiction are
subject to review every 10 years; and
(E) have a view toward insuring against duplication
of Federal programs.
(2) Not later than March 31 in the first session of a
Congress, after consultation with the Speaker, the Majority
Leader, and the Minority Leader, the Committee on Government
Reform shall report to the House the oversight plans submitted
by committees together with any recommendations that it, or the
House leadership group described above, may make to ensure the
most effective coordination of oversight plans and otherwise to
achieve the objectives of this clause.
(e) The Speaker, with the approval of the House, may
appoint special ad hoc oversight committees for the purpose of
reviewing specific matters within the jurisdiction of two or
more standing committees.

* * * * *

Special oversight functions

3. (g)(1) The Committee on Homeland Security shall review
and study on a continuing basis all Government activities
relating to homeland security, including the interaction of all
departments and agencies with the Department of Homeland
Security.
(2) In addition, the committee shall review and study on
a primary and continuing basis all Government activities,
programs and organizations related to homeland security that
fall within its primary legislative jurisdiction.

----------

Legislative History To Accompany Changes to Rule X

(Congressional Record, January 4, 2005, Page H25)

Rule X and the Committee on Homeland Security

Legislative History

Overall homeland security policy--The jurisdiction of the
Committee on Homeland Security over ``overall homeland security
policy'' is to be interpreted on a government-wide or multi-
agency basis similar to the Committee on Government Reform's
jurisdiction over ``overall economy, efficiency, and management
of government operations and activities . . . .'' Surgical
addresses of homeland security policy in sundry areas of
jurisdiction occupied by other committees would not be referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security on the basis of
``overall'' homeland security policy jurisdiction.
For example, the Committee on Homeland Security shall have
jurisdiction over a bill coordinating the homeland security
efforts by all of the critical infrastructure protection
sectors. Jurisdiction over a bill addressing the protection of
a particular sector would lie with the committee otherwise
having jurisdiction over that sector.
Organization and administration of the Department of
Homeland Security--The jurisdiction of the Committee on
Homeland Security would apply only to organizational or
administrative aspects of the Department where another
committee's jurisdiction did not clearly apply. The Committee's
jurisdiction is to be confined to organizational and
administrative efforts and would not apply to programmatic
efforts within the Department of Homeland Security within the
jurisdiction of other committees.
Homeland Security Oversight--This would vest the Committee
on Homeland Security with oversight jurisdiction over the
homeland security community of the United States. Nothing in
this clause shall be construed as prohibiting or otherwise
restricting the authority of any other committee to study and
review homeland security activities to the extent that such
activity directly affects a matter otherwise within the
jurisdiction of that committee.

Individual Committee Concerns

Agriculture--The jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland
Security over ``border and port security'' shall be limited to
agricultural importation and entry inspection activities of the
Department of Homeland Security under section 421 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002. The Committee on Agriculture
shall retain jurisdiction over animal and plant disease policy
including the authority reserved to the Department of
Agriculture to regulate policy under section 421 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and the Animal Health Protection
Act, the Plant Protection Act, the Plant Quarantine Act, and
the Agriculture Quarantine Inspection User Fee Account. The
Committee on Agriculture shall retain jurisdiction over the
agricultural research and diagnosis mission at the Plum Island
Animal Disease Center.
Armed Services--The Committee on Armed Services shall
retain jurisdiction over warfighting, the military defense of
the United States, and other military activities, including any
military response to terrorism, pursuant to section 876 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Energy and Commerce--The Committee on Homeland Security
shall have jurisdiction over measures that address the
Department of Homeland Security's activities for domestic
preparedness and collective response to terrorism. The words
``to terrorism'' require a direct relation to terrorism. The
Committee on Homeland Security's jurisdiction over ``collective
response to terrorism'' means that it shall receive referrals
of bills addressing the Department of Homeland Security's
responsibilities for, and assistance to, first responders as a
whole. The Committee on Energy and Commerce (and other relevant
committees) shall retain their jurisdiction over bills
addressing the separate entities that comprise the first
responders. For example, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
shall retain its jurisdiction over a bill directing the
Department of Health and Human Services to train emergency
medical personnel.
Financial Services--The Committee on Financial Services
shall retain jurisdiction over the National Flood Insurance
Program and Emergency Food and Shelter Program of FEMA, and the
Defense Production Act. The Committee on Financial Services
shall retain its jurisdiction over the anti-money laundering,
terrorist financing, and anti-counterfeiting activities within
the Department of the Treasury and the financial regulators.
Government Reform--The Committee on Homeland Security shall
have jurisdiction over ``the organization and administration of
the Department of Homeland Security.'' The Committee on
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over federal civil
service, the overall economy, efficiency, and management of
government operations and activities, including Federal
procurement, and federal paperwork reduction. The Committee on
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over government-
wide information management efforts including the Federal
Information Security Management Act. The Committee on Homeland
Security shall have jurisdiction over integration, analysis,
and dissemination of homeland security information by the
Department of Homeland Security, and the Committee on
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over measures
addressing public information and records generally including
the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act. The
Committee on Government Reform shall have jurisdiction over the
policy coordination responsibilities of the Office of
Counternarcotics Enforcement.
Intelligence--The Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence shall retain jurisdiction over the intelligence
and intelligence-related activities of all departments and
agencies of the Federal Government, including the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence and the National
Counterterrorism Center as defined in the Intelligence Reform
and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.
Judiciary--The Committee on the Judiciary shall retain
jurisdiction over immigration policy and non-border enforcement
of the immigration laws. Its jurisdiction over immigration
policy shall include matters such as the immigration and
naturalization process, numbers of aliens (including immigrants
and non-immigrants) allowed, classifications and lengths of
allowable stay, the adjudication of immigration petitions and
the requirements for the same, the domestic adjudication of
immigration petitions and applications submitted to the
Department of Labor or the Department of Homeland Security and
setting policy with regard to visa issuance and acceptance. Its
jurisdiction over non-border enforcement shall be limited to
those aspects of immigration enforcement not associated with
the immediate entry of individuals into the country, including
those aspects of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
Enforcement. The Committee on Homeland Security shall have
jurisdiction over border and port security including the
immigration responsibilities of inspectors at ports of entry
and the border patrol. As used in the new Rule X(1)(l)(9) and
this legislative history, the word ``immigration'' shall be
construed to include ``naturalization'' and no substantive
change is intended by the new rule's not containing the word
``naturalization.''
Science--The Committee on Science shall retain some
jurisdiction over the research and development activities of
the Department of Homeland Security as such matters are
incidental to the Committee on Science's existing jurisdiction
(except where those activities are in the jurisdiction of
another committee).
Transportation and Infrastructure--The Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure shall retain jurisdiction
over the Coast Guard. However, the Committee on Homeland
Security has jurisdiction over port security, and some Coast
Guard responsibilities in that area will fall within the
jurisdiction of both committees. Jurisdiction over emergency
preparedness will be split between the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Homeland
Security. The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
shall retain its jurisdiction under clause 1(r)(2) over
``federal management of emergencies and natural disasters.''
This means that the committee retains its general jurisdiction
over the emergency preparedness and response operations of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Bills addressing
FEMA's general preparation for disaster from any cause shall be
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
The Committee on Homeland Security shall have jurisdiction over
the Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities with
regard to emergency preparedness only as they relate to acts of
terrorism. Thus, the Committee on Homeland Security shall have
jurisdiction over the responsibilities of the Office for
Domestic Preparedness, in accordance with section 430 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
As indicated earlier, the Committee on Homeland Security's
jurisdiction over ``collective response to terrorism'' means
that it would receive referrals of bills addressing the
Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities for, and
assistance to, first responders as a whole and not over
measures addressing first responder communities individually.
The Committee on Homeland Security shall have jurisdiction
over the functions of the Department of Homeland Security
relating to transportation security, while the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure shall retain its jurisdiction
over transportation safety. In general, the Committee on
Homeland Security would have jurisdiction over bills addressing
the Transportation Security Administration and the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure would have jurisdiction over
bills addressing the various entities within the Department of
Transportation having responsibility for transportation safety,
such as the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The jurisdiction of the
Committee on Homeland Security does not include expenditures
from trust funds under the jurisdiction of other committees,
including but not limited to the Highway Trust Fund, the
Airport and Airway Trust Fund, the Harbor Maintenance Trust
Fund, the Federal Buildings Fund, and the Inland Waterways
Trust Fund.
Ways and Means--The jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways
and Means over ``customs revenue'' is intended to include those
functions contemplated in section 412(b)(2) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 and includes those functions as carried
out in collection districts and ports of entry and delivery.
----------

Changes to the Standing Rules -- Section-by-Section Analysis

(Congressional Record, January 3, 2013, Page H12)

Clarifications in Rule X. Subsection (c) makes two
clarifications with respect to clause 1 of rule X. Paragraph
(1) clarifies that the Committee on Homeland Security's
jurisdiction includes the general management of the Department
of Homeland Security. This change is intended to clarify the
Committee's existing jurisdiction over the organization and
administration of the department, and is not intended to alter
the pattern of bill referrals to the Committee on Homeland
Security, nor is it intended to alter the existing oversight
jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland Security. Paragraph
(2) conforms terminology used in the Committee on Natural
Resources jurisdiction to terminology recognized by the
Departments of State and Interior.
Membership and Organization of the Committee on Homeland Security

(18-14)

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Vice
Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Vacancy Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
Loretta Sanchez, California
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Brian Higgins, New York
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Ron Barber, Arizona
Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
Filemon Vela, Texas
Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
Eric Swalwell, California
__________
Appointment of Mr.Michael T. McCaul as Chair, and Mr.Bennie
G. Thompson of Mississippi as Ranking Minority Member on
January 3, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 6 and H. Res. 7,
respectively.
The Majority Members of the Committee were elected to the
Committee on January 4, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 17; and the
Minority Members on January 3, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 7.
Ms. Janice Hahn of California resigned as a Member of the
Committee on Homeland Security on January 14, 2013.
Mr. Filemon Vela of Texas, Mr. Steven A. Horsford of
Nevada, and Mr. Eric Swalwell of California were elected to the
Committee on January 14, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 22.
Mr. Keith J. Rothfus of Pennsylvania resigned as a Member
of the Committee on Homeland Security on April 16, 2013.
Mr. Mark Sanford of South Carolina was elected to the
Committee on June 12, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 257.

----------

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Brian Higgins, New York
Loretta Sanchez, California
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Loretta Sanchez, California
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Yvette D. Clarke, New York
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Filemon Vela, Texas
Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Ron Barber, Arizona
Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Vice Chair
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana,
Ranking Member
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Eric Swalwell, California
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi,
Vice Chair
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Brian Higgins, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
HISTORY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Select Committees on Homeland Security

107th Congress
In the 107th Congress, the House Select Committee on
Homeland Security was established on June 19, 2002, pursuant to
H. Res. 449 (adopted by voice vote). The Committee was composed
of nine Members of the House: Mr. Richard ``Dick'' Armey of
Texas, Chairman; Mr. Thomas DeLay of Texas; Mr. Julius Caesar
``J.C.'' Watts of Oklahoma; Ms. Deborah Pryce of Ohio; Mr.
Robert Portman of Ohio; Ms. Nancy Pelosi of California; Mr.
Jonas Martin Frost of Texas; Mr. Robert Menendez of New Jersey;
and Ms. Rosa L. DeLauro of Connecticut.
The mandate of the Select Committee in the 107th Congress
was to ``develop recommendations and report to the House on
such matters that relate to the establishment of a department
of homeland security.'' The Select Committee accomplished its
mandate on November 22, 2002, when the House concurred in the
Senate amendment to H.R. 5005, a bill establishing the
Department of Homeland Security, by unanimous consent, and
cleared H.R. 5005 for the President. The bill was presented to
the President on November 22, 2002, and was signed on November
25, 2002, becoming Public Law 107-296.
The termination date of the House Select Committee on
Homeland Security was ``after final disposition of a bill [ . .
. ] including final disposition of any veto message on such
bill,'' which occurred on November 25, 2002.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 107-296................. The Homeland H.R. 5005
Security Act of
2002..
------------------------------------------------------------------------

108th Congress
The second House Select Committee on Homeland Security was
established in the 108th Congress on January 7, 2003, pursuant
to provisions of H. Res. 5 (adopted by a recorded vote of 221
yeas and 203 nays). The Membership of the Select Committee was
established on February 12, 2003, as: Mr. Christopher Cox of
California, Chairman; Ms. Jennifer Dunn of Washington; Mr.
William ``Bill'' Young of Florida; Mr. Donald ``Don'' Young of
Alaska; Mr. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. of Wisconsin; Mr.
Wilbert Joseph ``Billy'' Tauzin of Louisiana; Mr. David Dreier
of California; Mr. Duncan Hunter of California; Mr. Harold
Rogers of Kentucky; Mr. Sherwood Boehlert of New York; Mr.
Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr. Wayne Curtis ``Curt'' Weldon of
Pennsylvania; Mr. Christopher Shays of Connecticut; Mr. Porter
J. Goss of Florida; Mr. David Camp of Michigan; Mr. Lincoln
Diaz-Balart of Florida; Mr. Robert W. Goodlatte of Virginia;
Mr. Ernest James Istook, Jr. of Oklahoma; Mr. Peter T. King of
New York; Mr. John E. Linder of Georgia; Mr. John B. Shadegg of
Arizona; Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. William McClellan
``Mac'' Thornberry of Texas; Mr. James A. Gibbons of Nevada;
Ms. Kay Granger of Texas; Mr. Pete Sessions of Texas; Mr. John
E. Sweeney of New York; Mr. Jim Turner of Texas; Mr. Bennie G.
Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California; Mr.
Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman D. Dicks of
Washington; Mr. Barney Frank of Massachusetts; Ms. Jane Harman
of California; Mr. Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland; Ms. Louise
M. Slaughter of New York; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon; Mrs.
Nita M. Lowey of New York; Mr. Robert E. Andrews of New Jersey;
Ms. Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Delegate from the District of
Columbia; Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms. Karen McCarthy of
Missouri; Ms. Shiela Jackson Lee of Texas; Mr. William ``Bill''
Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mrs. Donna M. Christensen, a
Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr. Bobby ``Bob''
Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr. Charles Gonzalez of Texas; Mr.
Ken Lucas of Kentucky; Mr. James R. Langevin of Rhode Island;
and Mr. Kendrick B. Meek of Florida.
The Select Committee was authorized to develop
recommendations and report to the House by bill or otherwise on
such matters that relate to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(Public Law 107-296) as may be referred to it by the Speaker,
and was charged with reviewing and studying on a continuing
basis laws, programs, and Government activities relating to
homeland security. In addition, the Select Committee was
directed to conduct a thorough and complete study of the
operation and implementation of the Rules of the House,
including Rule X, with respect to the issue of homeland
security, and submit its recommendations regarding any changes
in the Rules of the House to the Committee on Rules not later
than September 30, 2004.
On September 30, 2004, the Select Committee on Homeland
Security submitted its recommendations on jurisdictional
changes to the Rules of the House of Representatives to the
Committee on Rules.
The Committee had six measures signed into law during the
108th Congress:

Pub. L. 108-268................. To provide for the H.R. 4332
transfer of the
Nebraska Avenue
Naval Complex in
the District of
Columbia to
facilitate the
establishment of
the headquarters
for the
Department of
Homeland
Security, to
provide for the
acquisition by
the Department of
the Navy of
suitable
replacement
facilities..

Pub. L. 108-276................. Project BioShield S.15
Act of 2004.. (H.R. 2122)

Pub. L. 108-293................. Coast Guard and H.R. 2443
Maritime
Transportation
Act of 2004..

Pub. L. 108-330................. Department of H.R. 4259
Homeland Security
Financial
Accountability
Act..

Pub. L. 108-458................. Intelligence S.2845
Reform and (H.R. 5223)
Terrorism
Prevention Act of
2004..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.

Pursuant to H.Res. 5, the Select Committee terminated on
January 2, 2005, with the expiration of the 108th Congress.

Committee on Homeland Security

109th Congress
The 109th Congress marked the first Congress for the
standing Committee on Homeland Security. During the two
previous Congresses, the House of Representatives established
separate Select Committees on Homeland Security: the first - to
establish the Department of Homeland Security, the second - to
monitor the initial activities of the Department and to examine
the need for a standing committee in the House with
jurisdictional authority over matters relating to the issue of
homeland security.
The Committee on Homeland Security was established as a
standing Committee of the House with the passage of H.Res. 5,
on January 4, 2005. The resolution was adopted by a recorded
vote of 220 yeas and 195 nays.
The Committee Membership was set at 34 Members with 19
Republicans and 15 Democrats. The following Members were
appointed to the Committee on Homeland Security for all or part
of the Congress: Mr. Christopher Cox of California; Mr. Peter
T. King of New York; Mr. Don Young of Alaska; Mr. Lamar S.Smith
of Texas; Mr. Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania; Mr. Christopher
Shays of Connecticut; Mr. John Linder of Georgia; Mr. Mark E.
Souder of Indiana; Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia; Mr. Daniel E.
Lungren of California; Mr. Jim Gibbons of Nevada; Mr. Rob
Simmons of Connecticut; Mr. Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr. Stevan
Pearce of New Mexico; Ms. Katherine Harris of Florida; Mr.
Bobby Jindal of Louisiana; Mr. David G. Reichert of Washington;
Mr. Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr. Charles W. Dent of
Pennsylvania; Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida; Mr. Bennie G.
Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California; Mr.
Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman D. Dicks of
Washington; Ms. Jane Harman of California; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio
of Oregon; Ms. Nita M. Lowey of New York; Ms. Eleanor Holmes
Norton of District of Columbia; Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California;
Ms. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas; Mr. Bill Pascrell of Jr., New
Jersey; Ms. Donna M. Christensen of U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr.
Bob Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr. James R. Langevin of Rhode
Island; and Mr. Kendrick B. Meek of Florida.
On February 9, 2005, the Committee on Homeland Security
adopted its Rules, which provided for the establishment of five
Subcommittees. The Subcommittee on Prevention of Nuclear and
Biological Attack; the Subcommittee on Intelligence,
Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment; the
Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection,
and Cybersecurity; the Subcommittee on Management, Integration,
and Oversight; and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Science, and Technology.
On October 7, 2005, the Committee revised its Rules to
establish a Subcommittee on Investigations.
The Committee had eight measures signed into law during the
109th Congress:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 109-13.................. Emergency H.R. 1268\2\
Supplemental (H.R. 418)
Appropriations
Act for Defense,
the Global War on
Terror, and
Tsunami Relief,
2005..

Pub. L. 109-59.................. Safe, Accountable, H.R. 3
Flexible,
Efficient
Transportation
Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users..

Pub. L. 109-163................. National Defense H.R. 1815
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2006..

Pub. L. 109-241................. Coast Guard and H.R. 889
Maritime
Transportation
Act of 2006..

Pub. L. 109-295................. Department of H.R. 5441
Homeland Security
Appropriations
Act, 2007..
(Title VI - Post
Katrina Emergency
Management Reform
Act).

Pub. L. 109-347................. ``Security and H.R. 4954
Accountability
For Every Port
Act of 2006'' or
the ``SAFE Port
Act''..

Pub. L. 109-364................. John Warner H.R. 5122
National Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2007..

Pub. L. 109-367................. Secure Fence Act H.R. 6061
of 2006..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.

110th Congress
The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 4, 2007, by a record vote of 235 yeas and
195 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2007,
for an organizational meeting for the 110th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi. The
Committee Membership was set at 34 Members with 19 Democrats
and 15 Republicans. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez of
California; Mr. Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman
D. Dicks of Washington; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Mr. Peter
A. DeFazio of Oregon; Mrs.Nita M. Lowey of New York; Ms.Eleanor
Holmes Norton a Delegate from the District of Columbia; Ms.Zoe
Lofgren of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas;
Mrs.Donna M. Christensen a Delegate from the U.S. Virgin
Islands; Mr. Bob Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr. James R.
Langevin of Rhode Island; Mr. Henry Cuellar of Texas; Mr.
Christopher P. Carney of Pennsylvania; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke of
New York; Mr. Al Green of Texas; Mr. Ed Perlmutter of Colorado;
Mr. Bill Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mr. Peter T. King of New
York; Mr. Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr. Christopher Shays of
Connecticut; Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. Tom Davis of
Virginia; Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr. Mike Rogers
of Alabama; Mr. David G. Reichert of Washington; Mr. Michael T.
McCaul of Texas; Mr. Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania; Ms.Ginny
Brown-Waite of Florida; Mr. Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida; Mr.
David Davis of Tennessee; Mr. Paul C. Broun of Georgia;
Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan; Ms. Marsha Blackburn of
Tennessee; Mr. Kevin McCarthy of California; and Mr. Bobby
Jindal of Louisiana.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: the
Subcommittee on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism;
the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and
Terrorism Risk Assessment; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security and Infrastructure Protection; the Subcommittee on
Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology;
the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and
Response; and the Subcommittee on Management, Investigations,
and Oversight.
The Committee had four measures signed into law during the
110th Congress:

Pub. L. 110-181................. National Defense H.R. 4986\3\
Authorization Act (H.R. 1585)
for Fiscal Year
2008..

Pub. L. 110-388................. A bill to provide S.2816
for the
appointment of
the Chief Human
Capital Officer
of the Department
of Homeland
Security by the
Secretary of
Homeland
Security..

Pub. L. 110-412................. Personnel H.R. 6098
Reimbursement for
Intelligence
Cooperation and
Enhancement of
Homeland Security
Act of 2008..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.

111th Congress

The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 6, 2009, by a record vote of 235 yeas and
195 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on February 4, 2009,
for an organizational meeting for the 111th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi. The
Committee Membership, was set at 34 Members with 21 Democrats
and 13 Republicans. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta Sanchez, of
California; Ms. Jane Harman of California; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio
of Oregon; Ms. Eleanor Holmes Norton a Delegate from the
District of Columbia; Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms. Sheila
Jackson-Lee of Texas; Mr. Henry Cuellar of Texas; Mr.
Christopher P. Carney of Pennsylvania; Ms. Yvette D. Clarke of
New York; Ms. Laura Richardson of California; Mrs. Ann
Kirkpatrick of Arizona; Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico; Mr.
Bill Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mr. Emmanuel Cleaver of
Missouri; Mr. Al Green of Texas; Mr. James A. Himes of
Connecticut; Ms. Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio; Mr. Eric J.J. Massa of
New York; Ms. Dina Titus of Nevada; Mr. William L. Owens of New
York; Mr. Peter T. King of New York; Mr. Lamar Smith of Texas;
Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of
California; Mr. Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr. Michael T. McCaul
of Texas; Mr. Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania; Mr. Gus M.
Bilirakis of Florida; Mr. Paul C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs.
Candice S. Miller of Michigan; Mr. Pete Olson of Texas; Mr. Anh
``Joseph'' Cao of Louisiana; Mr. Steve Austria of Ohio; and Mr.
Tom Graves of Georgia.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: the
Subcommittee on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism;
the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and
Terrorism Risk Assessment; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security and Infrastructure Protection; the Subcommittee on
Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology;
the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and
Response; and the Subcommittee on Management, Investigations,
and Oversight.
The Committee had 14 measures signed into law during the
111th Congress:

111th Congress

Pub. L. 111--140................ Nuclear Forensics H.R. 730
and Attribution
Act..

Pub. L. 111--145................ United States H.R. 1299\5\
Capitol Police (H.R. 2935)
Administrative
Technical
Correction Act of
2009..

Pub. L. 111--198................ Homebuyer H.R. 5623
Assistance and
Improvement Act..Pub. L. 111--207................ Cruise Vessel H.R. 3360
Security and
Safety Act of
2009..Pub. L. 111--245................ First Responder H.R. 3978
Anti-Terrorism
Training
Resources Act..Pub. L. 111--252................ To allow certain H.R. 1517
U.S. Customs and
Border Protection
employees who
serve under an
overseas limited
appointment for
at least 2 years,
and whose service
is rated fully
successful or
higher throughout
that time, to be
converted to a
permanent
appointment in
the competitive
service..Pub. L. 111--258................ Reducing Over- H.R. 553
Classification
Act..Pub. L. 111--259................ Intelligence H.R. 2701
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2011..Pub. L. 111--271................ Redundancy H.R. 3980
Elimination and
Enhanced
Performance for
Preparedness
Grants Act..Pub. L. 111--281................ Coast Guard H.R. 3619
Authorization Act
of 2010..Pub. L. 111--356................ Northern Border H.R. 4748
Counternarcotics
Strategy Act of
2010..Pub. L. 111--376................ Anti-Border S. 3243
Corruption Act of
2010..Pub. L. 111--_.................. Ike Skelton H.R. 6523
National Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2011..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.
\5\ Indicates measures which were not referred to the Committee, but to
which measures were included during Congressional action.

112th Congress

The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 5, 2011, by a record vote of 238 yeas and
191 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 26, 2011,
for an organizational meeting for the 112th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Peter T. King of New York. The Committee
Membership, was set at 33 Members with 19 Republicans and 14
Democrats. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Mr.Peter T. King of New York; Mr.Lamar Smith of Texas;
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr.Mike Rogers of Alabama;
Mr.Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr.Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida;
Mr.Paul C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan;
Mr.Tim Walberg of Michigan; Mr.Chip Cravaack of Minnesota;
Mr.Joe Walsh of Illinois; Mr.Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania;
Mr.Benjamin Quayle of Arizona; Mr.Scott Rigell of Virginia;
Mr.Billy Long of Missouri; Mr.Jeff Duncan of South Carolina;
Mr.Tom Marino of Pennsylvania; Mr.Blake Farenthold of Texas;
Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama; and Mr.Robert L. Turner of New
York.Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez,
of California; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson
Lee of Texas; Mr.Henry Cuellar of Texas; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke of
New York; Ms.Laura Richardson of California;Mrs.Donna M.
Christensen a Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr.Danny
K. Davis of Illinois; Mr.Brian Higgins of New York; Ms.Jackie
Speier of California; Mr.Cedric L. Richmond of Louisiana;
Mr.Hansen Clarke of Michigan; Mr.William R. Keating of
Massachusetts; Ms.Kathleen C. Hochul of New York; Ms.Janice
Hahn of California; and Mr.Ron Barber of Arizona.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: The
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security; the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management; the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications; the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security; and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.
The Committee had 10 measures signed into law during the
112th Congress:

112th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 112--54................. Asia-Pacific S. 1487
Economic (H.R.2042)
Cooperation
Business Travel
Cards Act of
2011..Pub. L. 112--81................. National Defense H.R.1540
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2012..Pub. L. 112--86................. Risk-Based H.R.1801
Security
Screening for
Members of the
Armed Forces Act.Pub. L. 112--127................ Border Tunnel H.R.4119
Prevention Act of
2012.Pub. L. 112--171................ To require the H.R.3670
Transportation
Security
Administration to
comply with the
Uniformed
Services
Employment and
Reemployment
Rights Act..Pub. L. 112--199................ Whistleblower S.743
Protection (H.R. 3289)
Enhancement Act
of 2012..Pub. L. 112--205................ Jaime Zapata H.R.915
Border
Enforcement
Security Task
Force Act..Pub. L. 112--213................ Coast Guard and H.R. 2838
Maritime
Transportation
Act of 2012 ..Pub. L. 112--217................ DHS Audit S. 1998
Requirement (H.R.5941)
Target Act of
2012..Pub. L. 112--218................ No-Hassle Flying S. 3542
Act of 2012.. (H.R.6028)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.
\7\ Indicates measures which were not referred to the Committee, but to
which Members were appointed as Conferees.

113th Congress

The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 3, 2013, by a record vote of 228 yeas and
196 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2013,
for an organizational meeting for the 113th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Michael T. McCaul of Texas. The Committee
Membership, was set at 32 Members with 18 Republicans and 14
Democrats. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr. Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr.
Peter T. King of New York; Mr. Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr. Paul
C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs. Candice S.Miller of Michigan; Mr.
Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania; Mr. Jeff Duncan of South
Carolina; Mr. Tom Marino of Pennsylvania; Mr. Jason Chaffetz of
Utah; Mr. Steven M. Palazzo of Mississippi; Mr. Lou Barletta of
Pennsylvania; Mr. Chris Stewart of Utah; Mr. Keith J. Rothfus
of Pennsylvania; Mr. Richard Hudson of North Carolina; Mr.
Steve Daines of Montana; Mrs. Susan W. Brooks of Indiana; Mr.
Scott Perry of Pennsylvania; Mr. Mark Sanford of South
Carolina; Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms. Loretta
Sanchez of California; Ms. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas; Ms.
Yvette D. Clarke of New York; Mr. Brian Higgins of New York;
Mr. Cedric L. Richmond of Louisiana; Mr. William R. Keating of
Massachusetts; Mr. Ron Barber of Arizona; Mr. Donald M. Payne,
Jr. of New Jersey; Mr. Beto O'Rourke of Texas; Ms. Tulsi
Gabbard of Hawaii; Mr. Filemon Vela of Texas; Mr. Steven A.
Horsford of Nevada; and Mr. Eric Swalwell of California.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence; the
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security; the Subcommittee
no Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies; the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiency; the Subcommittee on Transportation Security; and
the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
The Committee had one measure signed into law during the
First Session of the 113th Congress:

113th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 113--27................. Helping Heroes Fly H.R. 1344
Act.. (S. 1367)
(S. 1403))
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full Committee

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Committee on Homeland Security held nine hearings, receiving
testimony from 27 witnesses, and considered six measures.

----------

Organizational Meeting of the Committee

The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2013,
for an organizational meeting for the 113th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Michael T. McCaul of Texas.
The Full Committee met pursuant to notice and adopted the
Committee Rules for the 113th Congress by unanimous consent.
The Committee also approved the Committee on Homeland
Security's Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress and Committee
Resolution No. 1, relating to staff hiring, both adopted by
unanimous consent.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

HELPING HEROES FLY ACT

Pub. Law 113-27, H.R. 1344 (S. 1367, S. 1403)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to provide expedited air passenger screening to
severely injured or disabled members of the Armed Forces and
severely injured or disabled veterans, and for other purposes.
Summary
This law directs the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) to develop and implement a process to ease travel and, to
the extent possible, provide expedited passenger screening
services for severely injured or disabled Armed Forces members
and veterans, and their accompanying family members or non-
medical attendants. The TSA is required to maintain an
operations center to provide for the movement of such members
and veterans through screening before boarding a domestic or
foreign passenger aircraft. Additionally, the law requires TSA
to establish and publish certain protocols to contact the
operations center to request expedited screening services for
the service member or veteran. Furthermore, the TSA is directed
to annually report to Congress on the implementation of the
program. The TSA retains its flexibility to require additional
screening of any individual if intelligence or law enforcement
information indicates that additional screening is necessary.
As of March 2013, TSA began implementing the policies
codified in this law at security screening checkpoints. This
law seeks to facilitate the screening of our Nation's wounded
warriors' through airports and free up TSA screeners to focus
on real threats to our aviation systems. The Committee has long
advocated for less onerous airport screening for our men and
women in uniform. In fact, this bill builds upon past
legislation promoted by the Committee, including the Risk-Based
Security Screening for Members of the Armed Forces Act (Pub. L.
112-86), which requires TSA to provide expedited screening to
active duty military traveling on official orders.
Legislative History
H.R. 1344 was introduced in the House on March 21, 2013, by
Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Joyce, and Mr. Richmond, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1344
was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The House considered H.R. 1344 on May 21, 2013, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\
recorded vote of 413 yeas with none voting ``nay'', (Roll No.
166).
H.R. 1344 was received in the Senate on May 22, 2013, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
On August 1, 2013, the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation was discharged from further
consideration of H.R. 1344 by unanimous consent. The Senate
then passed H.R. 1344, with an amendment, by unanimous consent.
The House concurred in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1344,
on August 2, 2013, by unanimous consent.
H.R. 1344 was presented to the President on August 6, 2013,
and signed into law on August 9, 2013, as Public Law 113-27.

S. 1367, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the
Senate on July 25, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation.

S. 1403, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the
Senate on July 31, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation. The text of S. 1403 was adopted by the Senate
during consideration of H.R. 1344 on August 1, 2013.

TSA LOOSE CHANGE ACT

H.R. 1095

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory
Committee, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 1095 directs the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) to transfer unclaimed monies recovered at
airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations
providing places of rest and recuperation at airports for
members of the Armed Forces and their families, and establishes
a request for proposals (RFP) process to select such
organizations.
Section 44945 of title 49, U.S.C., enacted as part of
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub.
L. 108-334), authorized and directed unclaimed money collected
at airport security checkpoints to be used for civil aviation
security. According to the report ``FY 2012 Unclaimed Money at
Airports,'' which was prepared TSA, from FY 2009 through FY
2012, TSA has collected an average of $465,285 from airport
security checkpoints annually. Just in FY 2012 alone, TSA
collected $531,395. However as of March 1, 2013, TSA only
expended $6,539 for the purpose of civil aviation security.
The Explanatory Statement contained in the Conference
Report (H. Rpt. 112-492) that accompanied the Consolidated and
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, (Pub. L. 113-6),
required TSA to issue a report on the feasibility of
transferring the unclaimed money recovered at airport
checkpoints to non-profit organizations that are selected on a
competitive basis. According to the report, it would cost the
Federal Government approximately $201,000 for the first year
alone if TSA was to transfer the money to a nonprofit
organization selected on a competitive basis. Further, the
report concluded that to minimize administrative overhead, TSA
would prefer to award the use of funding to one nonprofit
organization. After reviewing TSA's report, the Committee
believes that in order to ensure fairness of opportunity while
minimizing administrative overhead, TSA should transfer the
funds after a RFP is issued. Currently, United Services
Organizations (USO) is the sole non-profit operating airport
lounges for military service members and their families.
However, any non-profit organization that provides these kinds
of services can submit a proposal to TSA to seek these
unclaimed funds.
Legislative History
112th Congress
H.R. 2179 was introduced in the House on June 14, 2011, by
Mr. Miller of Florida and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2179 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
On March 7, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security considered H.R. 2179 and reported the measure to the
Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, without
amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 2179 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 2179 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-468.

113th Congress
H.R. 1095 was introduced in the House on March 12, 2013, by
Mr. Miller of Florida and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R. 1095 was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security.
On October 29, 2013, the Chair discharged the Subcommittee
on Transportation Security from further consideration of H.R.
1095.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 1095 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 1095 to the House on November
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-274.
The House considered H.R. 1095 under Suspension of the
Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R. 1095 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

AVIATION SECURITY STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2013

H.R. 1204 (S. 1804)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory
Committee, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 1204 authorizes the Aviation Security Advisory
Committee (ASAC) and requires Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) to consult with the ASAC on aviation
security matters, including on the development and
implementation of policies, programs, rulemakings and security
directives. Additionally, the bill requires the ASAC to submit
recommendations to TSA.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) established the
ASAC in 1989 following the bombing of Pan American World
Airways Flight 103. Upon the establishment of the TSA,
sponsorship of the ASAC was transferred to TSA. However,
despite strong support from aviation security stakeholders who
participated in the ASAC, TSA has allowed the ASAC's charter to
expire. On July 7, 2011, TSA published an announcement in the
Federal Register to re-establish the ASAC, providing a setting
for the aviation industry to formally communicate with TSA and
on October 27, 2011, the Secretary of Homeland Security
appointed 24 new members to the ASAC. On June 11, 2013, TSA
published a notice of charter renewal in the Federal Register
to announce the renewal of the ASAC. This legislation not only
codifies current Department and TSA policy but also ensures
that the ASAC remains intact.
In this budgetary environment, it is imperative that the
TSA interact with industry stakeholders for input on security
procedures and technology to ensure that the Administration is
spending its limited resources on initiatives that will enhance
aviation security for the traveling public.
Legislative History
112th Congress
H.R.1447 was introduced in the House on April 8, 2011, by
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi and Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.1447 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security.
On September 21, 2011, the Chair discharged the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security from further
consideration of H.R.1447. The Committee proceeded to the
consideration of H.R.1447 and ordered the measure to be
reported to the House, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1447 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-269.
The House considered H.R.1447 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012
by voice vote.
H.R.1447 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

113th Congress
H.R. 1204 was introduced in the House on March 14, 2013, by
Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Richmond, Ms. Jackson Lee, and
Mr. Swalwell of California and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1204 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee considered H.R. 1204 on July 24, 2013, and
forwarded H.R. 1204 to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 1204 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 1204 to the House on December
2, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-278.
The House considered H.R. 1204 under Suspension of the
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 411
yeas and 3 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 617).
H.R. 1204 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

S. 1804, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in
the Senate on December 11, 2013.

BORDER SECURITY RESULTS ACT OF 2013

H.R. 1417 (S. 683)

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control
of the international borders of the United States, and for
other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 1417 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to
develop a comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain
situational awareness and operational control of the border,
and sets the requirement of achieving operational control in
high traffic areas within two years and nine months of
enactment and across the entire Southwest border within five
years. Operational Control of the border, as defined by the
bill, means a condition where there is a 90 percent
effectiveness rate for the apprehension of illegal border
crossers and a significant reduction in the movement of illicit
drugs and other contraband.
This legislation sets the requirements for the Secretary to
consider when developing the strategy; outlines the benchmarks
and timetables for achieving situational awareness and
operational control; and requires metrics to measure
effectiveness. H.R. 1417 also requires the Secretary to issue a
baseline assessment of the current level of situational
awareness and operational control of the border and
periodically thereafter until the border is deemed to be under
operational control. Following the baseline assessment, the
Secretary would be required to submit a comprehensive strategy
and subsequent plan to gain situational awareness and
operational control. The plan would be comprised of
implementation plans for each of the Department's border
security components and a comprehensive border security
technology plan outlining a justification for technology
choices and a timetable for procurement and deployment. This
legislation also calls for periodic updates of the strategy and
implementation plan following the publication of future
Quadrennial Homeland Security Review.
The Secretary must implement a series of metrics to measure
the effectiveness of security between the ports of entry, at
ports of entry, and in the maritime environment. H.R. 1417 also
requires a Department of Homeland Security National Laboratory
and a Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence to
provide an independent assessment of the suitability of the
metrics the Department develops, and to make recommendations
for additional metrics to measure border security
effectiveness.
Finally, the legislation requires the Government
Accountability Office to review and report to Congress on the
suitability and validity of the Secretary's strategy, plan,
metrics, and the certification of operational control.
Legislative History
H.R. 1417 was introduced in the House on April 9, 2013, by
Mr. McCaul, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Mr.
Thompson of Mississippi and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1417 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security. S. 683,
the Senate companion measure was introduced on April 9, 2013,
and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security considered
H.R. 1417 on April 24, 2013, and ordered the measure reported
to the Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, as
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security considered H.R. 1417 on
May 15, 2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House with a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice
vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 1417 to the House on May 20,
2013 as H. Rpt. 113-87, and placed on the Union Calendar,
Calendar No. 62.

WMD INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SHARING ACT OF 2013

H.R.1542

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish weapons
of mass destruction intelligence and information sharing
functions of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the
Department of Homeland Security and to require dissemination of
information analyzed by the Department to entities with
responsibilities relating to homeland security, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 1542 amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107-296) to direct the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to conduct
information sharing activities relevant to threats from weapons
of mass destruction (WMD). H.R. 1542 requires the Department to
support homeland security-focused intelligence analysis of
terrorist actors, their claims, and their plans to conduct
attacks involving chemical, biological, radiological, and
nuclear materials against the Nation and of global infectious
disease, public health, food, agricultural, and veterinary
issues. The act also requires DHS to support homeland security-
focused risk analysis and risk assessments of such homeland
security hazards by providing relevant quantitative and
qualitative threat information. Additionally, the act requires
DHS to leverage homeland security intelligence capabilities and
structures to enhance prevention, protection, response, and
recovery efforts with respect to a chemical, biological,
radiological, or nuclear attack. Furthermore, the act requires
DHS to share information and provide tailored analytical
support on these threats to state, local, and tribal
authorities as well as other national biosecurity and
biodefense stakeholders.
H.R. 1542 requires coordination within the Department and
with the Intelligence Community, Federal, State, local, and
Tribal authorities where appropriate. The act also directs the
Secretary of DHS to report annually on: (1) Intelligence and
information sharing activities to counter the threat from
weapons of mass destruction, and (2) DHS's activities in
accordance with relevant intelligence strategies.
Legislative History
112th Congress
H.R.2764 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2011, by
Mr.Meehan, Ms.Speier, Mr.Pascrell, Mr.Marino, Mr.King of New
York, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred to the Committee
on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2764 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.
The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
considered H.R.2764 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2764 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.2764 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-466.
The House considered H.R.2764 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.2764 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

113th Congress
H.R. 1542 was introduced in the House on April 24, 2013, by
Mr.Meehan, Ms. Speier, Mr. McCaul, Mr. King of New York, and
Mr.Higgins, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 1542 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The House considered H.R. 1542 on July 22, 2013, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\
record vote of 388 yeas and 3 nays, (Roll No. 375).
H.R. 1542 was received in the Senate on July 23, 2013, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS ALLOWABLE USE ACT

H.R. 1791

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority
under existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area
Security Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program
funding for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge
capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities.
Summary
H.R. 1791 amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107-296) to ensure that grants funds may continue to be used
for medical preparedness activities.
Legislative History

112th Congress
H.R. 5997 was introduced in the House on June 21, 2012, by
Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Clarke of Michigan, Mr. Turner of New York,
and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5997 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
The House considered H.R. 5997 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by a
\2/3\ recorded vote of 397 yeas and 1 nay (Roll No. 609).

113th Congress
H.R. 1791 was introduced in the House on April 26, 2013, by
Mr. Bilirakis, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, and Mr. King of New
York; and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 1791 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
On October 29, 2013, the Chair discharged the Subcommittee
on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications from
further consideration of H.R. 1791.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 1791 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 1791 to the House on November
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-273.

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ACQUISITION REFORM ACT

H.R. 2719

To require the Transportation Security Administration to
implement best practices and improve transparency with regard
to technology acquisition programs, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2719 was developed with valuable input from
stakeholders across the Federal Government and industry. The
bill introduces greater transparency and accountability for the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) spending decisions
through a series of commonsense reforms. Specifically, it
requires TSA to develop and share with the public, for the
first time: A strategic, multiyear technology investment plan;
share key information with Congress on technology acquisitions,
including cost overruns, delays, or technical failures within
30 days of identifying the problem; establish principles for
managing equipment in inventory to eliminate expensive storage
of unusable or outdated technologies; and report on its goals
for contracting with small businesses.
H.R. 2719 requires TSA to do a better job of not only
managing its own resources, but also leveraging resources
outside of the Department of Homeland Security.
Legislative History
H.R. 2719 was introduced in the House on July 18, 2013, by
Mr. Hudson, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Richmond, and Mr. Thompson of
Mississippi, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2719 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee considered H.R. 2719 on July 24, 2013, and
forwarded H.R. 2719 to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 2719 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 2719 to the House on November
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-275.
The House considered H.R. 2719 under Suspension of the
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 416
yeas and 0 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 616).
H.R. 2719 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADVANCEMENT ACT OF
2013

(CIRDA ACT OF 2013)

H.R. 2952

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain
improvements in the laws relating to the advancement of
security technologies for critical infrastructure protection,
and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R. 2952 directs the Department of Homeland Security to
facilitate the development of a Research and Development (R&D)
strategy for critical infrastructure security technologies.
This strategy will help our nation prioritize its investments
in those aspects of the infrastructure that are most at risk.
H.R. 2952 also directs the Secretary to explore the feasibility
of expanding the use of public-private R&D consortiums to
accelerate new security technologies and spur innovation and
economic competitiveness. In addition, CIRDA will designate a
`Technology Clearinghouse' where proven security tools for
protecting infrastructure can be rapidly shared amongst
government and private partners.
Legislative History
H.R. 2952 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2013, by
Mr. Meehan, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 2952 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies.
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R.
2952 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 2952 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.

HOMELAND SECURITY CYBERSECURITY BOOTS-ON-THE-GROUND ACT

H.R. 3107

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish
cybersecurity occupation classifications, assess the
cybersecurity workforce, develop a strategy to address
identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce, and for other
purposes.
Summary

H.R. 3107 directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to
establish cybersecurity occupation classifications and to
ensure that such classifications may be used throughout the
Department and are made available to other federal agencies.
H.R. 3107 also requires the Secretary to create a workforce
strategy that enhances the readiness, capacity, training,
recruitment, and retention of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) cybersecurity workforce, including a multi-phase
recruitment plan and a 10-year projection of federal workforce
needs. This legislation would also create a process to verify
that employees of independent contractors who serve in DHS
cybersecurity positions receive initial and recurrent
information security and role-based security training
commensurate with assigned responsibilities.
Legislative History
H.R. 3107 was introduced in the House on September 17,
2013, by Ms. Clarke, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 3107 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies.
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R.
3107 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 3107 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 3107 to the House on December
12, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-294.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Committee

After the attacks of September 11, 2001, President George
W. Bush declared: ``We're fighting a new kind of war against
determined enemies. And public servants long into the future
will bear the responsibility to defend Americans against
terror.'' Over a decade later, our enemies continue to evolve
and we must continue to adapt. The Department of Homeland
Security's structure and capabilities continue to mature. The
Department has a large role in defending our Nation from
vulnerabilities our enemies wish to exploit. It is this
Committee's responsibility pursuant to House Rule X, Clause
3(g) to ``review and study on a continuing basis all Government
activities relating to homeland security, including the
interaction of all departments and agencies with the Department
of Homeland Security.'' In addition, the Committee is to
``review and study on a primary and continuing basis all
Government activities, programs and organizations related to
homeland security that fall within its primary legislative
jurisdiction.''

THREATS TO THE HOMELAND

The Committee has continued to focus on the present and
persistent threat of terrorism. Scattered across the map are an
increasing number of individuals and organizations sympathetic
to al-Qaeda's message, reaching out to al Qaeda operatives, and
embracing their radical view.
On February 13, 2013, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``A New Perspective on Threats to the Homeland.'' The Committee
received testimony from ADM Thad Allen (Ret. USCG), Senior Vice
President, Booz Allen Hamilton; Mr. Shawn Henry, President,
CrowdStrike Services; Hon. Michael E. Leiter, Private Citizen;
Hon. David M. Walker, Founder and CEO, The Comeback America
Initiative; and Mr. Clark Kent Ervin, Partner, Patton Boggs,
LLP. The Committee will maintain its heightened focus on the
threat of terrorism from both within the Homeland and abroad,
and will continue to conduct rigorous oversight of efforts to
combat those threats.
The National Network of Fusion Centers (Network) was
developed in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to close
the gaps in information sharing between Federal, State, and
local law enforcement and emergency responders. Currently, the
Network includes 78 fusion centers across 49 states, three
territories and the District of Columbia. On July 26, 2013, the
Committee released a Majority Staff Report entitled ``The
National Network of Fusion Centers,'' detailing the Committee's
findings and recommendations developed from a comprehensive
study of fusions centers across the Nation. The report
concludes months of work by the Committee which included visits
to 32 fusion centers, in addition to briefings and discussions
with Federal partners and the National Fusion Center
Association. The Committee's review concludes that the Network
is not functioning as cohesively as it should be and fusion
centers are facing numerous challenges that prevent the Network
from realizing its full potential to help secure the Homeland.
The Committee will continue to work with Federal, State, and
local stakeholders in an effort to further mature and develop
the Network as a national homeland security asset.
Boko Harman is an Islamic jihadist militant organization
based in the northeast of Nigeria, north Cameroon and Niger
that seeks to establish a ``pure'' Islamic state ruled by
sharia law, putting a stop to what it deems ``Westernization.''
Boko Haram has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to waging
violent jihad. The organization's growing capacity and alliance
with al-Qaeda make it a threat to the Homeland and U.S.
interests abroad. In September, The Chair of the Full Committee
and the Chairs of the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence, and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Intelligence, released a report
entitled ``Boko Haram: Growing Threat to the U.S. Homeland.''
The Committee concluded that designating Boko Haram Foreign
Terrorist Organization (FTO) will ensure support for the
group's activities is prohibited by law. The Department of
State designated Boko Haram a FTO on November 13, 2013.
Throughout the First Session, Members of the Committee
received regular monthly classified briefings from the National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), the Department of Homeland
Security, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to stay
current on the latest intelligence and threats to the homeland.

THE BOSTON BOMBINGS

On April 15, 2013, two improvised explosive devices
detonated near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. This
attack killed three innocent victims and injured an estimated,
260 others. Local police, fire departments, medical personnel,
members of the National Guard, as well as the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), and officials from the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) responded to the scene, and began the
hunt for those responsible.
The suspects, identified several days later as Tamerlan and
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, were eventually cornered in Watertown,
Massachusetts in the early hours of Friday, April 19, 2013.
Tamerlan Tsarnaev sustained fatal injuries during his attempt
to flee authorities, while his younger brother evaded capture
for another several hours by hiding in a nearby boat. In the
aftermath of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's arrest and his brother's
death, the Committee--responding to public reports that
Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been previously identified as a potential
terrorist threat--initiated an investigation into what Federal
agencies knew about the danger he posed and what was done with
that information.
Though this review continues, the Committee is preparing to
release a report to document findings and recommendations based
on this attack to improve the security of the United States
Homeland. This effort has resulted in multiple briefings from
representatives of DHS, and FBI, as well as other Federal
officials, discussion with State and local law enforcement,
document requests and multiple Committee hearings and site
visits.
On May 9, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled
``The Boston Bombings: A First Look.'' The Committee received
testimony from Hon. Joseph I. Lieberman, former Senator from
the State of Connecticut; Mr. Edward F. Davis, III,
Commissioner, Boston Police Department; Hon. Kurt N. Schwartz,
Undersecretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security,
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and Dr. Erroll G. Southers,
Professor and Associate Director of Research Transition, DHS
National Center for Risk & Economic Analysis of Terrorism
Events (CREATE), Sol Price School of Public Policy, University
of Southern California. After the initial assessment from the
hearing, the Committee traveled twice to Boston to meet with
representatives from the Boston Police Department, DHS, and the
Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). Additionally, the Committee
met with the Intelligence Community Inspector General to
coordinate investigative efforts.
The Committee continued its examination into the Boston
bombings with a hearing on July 10 and 11, 2013, entitled
``Assessing Attacks on the Homeland: From Fort Hood to
Boston.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. Rudolph
``Rudy'' W. Giuliani, former Mayor, New York City; Hon. Michael
Leiter, former Director, National Counterterrorism Center; Dr.
Bruce Hoffman, Professor and Director, Center for Peace and
Security Studies and Security, Georgetown University; Hon. John
Cohen, Deputy Counterterrorism Coordinator and Senior Advisor
to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and
Hon. Matthew G. Olsen, Director, National Counterterrorism
Center. Due to the sensitive nature of some of the testimony,
portions of this hearing were held in Executive Session.
The Committee on Homeland Security continues its
investigation into the actions of the Federal Government prior
to the Boston bombing and post bombing. The Committee has sent
a series of letters to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Department of Homeland Security, and the National
Counterterrorism Center on their particular actions and
insights into the terrorists and events that occurred prior to
the attack. Additionally Members of the Committee and staff
have received a series of briefings regarding the bombing and
information sharing between agencies. Committee staff traveled
to Moscow, the Russian Federation and Georgia to investigate
Tamerlan Tsarnaev's travel and speak with officials on the
ground to gain insight into the radicalization of the suspects.
The Committee's investigation is on-going.

IMPLICATIONS OF SYRIA CRISIS ON HOMELAND SECURITY

In August 2013, the Syria government used chemical agents
on civilians in the Ghouta area of Damascus. As the United
States and its allies considered an international military
response, the Committee held numerous meetings and briefings to
understand what happened and what this meant for the security
of the Nation. On September 10, 2013, the Committee held a
hearing entitled ``Crisis in Syria: Implications for Homeland
Security.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon.
Christopher Shays, Former Representative in Congress from the
4th District of Connecticut; Major General Robert H. Scales,
Jr. (Ret. U.S. Army), former Commandant of the U.S. Army War
College; Mr. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior Fellow, Foundation for
Defense of Democracies; and Dr. Stephen Biddle, Adjunct Senior
Fellow for Defense Policy, Council on Foreign Relations. The
Committee will continue to closely monitor the Syrian crisis,
particularly to understand potential threats to the Homeland
from foreign fighters and the possibility of chemical weapons
falling into extremists' hands.

EFFECTS OF WESTERNERS JOINING TERROR GROUPS

In September 2013, Americans watched as hundreds ran for
cover and 68 people were murdered by vicious terrorists
invading a shopping mall in the Republic of Kenya. Terrorizing
these innocent people were al-Shabaab militants, a designated
Foreign Terrorist Organization. The most striking concern for
Americans is that within the ranks of al-Shabaab are Americans,
including 40 to 50 known fighters who have previously resided
in the U.S. to fight alongside these jihadists in Africa and
the Middle East. More than one hundred Americans are known to
be fighting overseas in support of terrorist organizations,
from the Middle East and Africa.
On October 9, 2013, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How Westerners Joining Terror
Groups Overseas Affect the Homeland.'' The Committee received
testimony from Prof. Michael Scheuer, Adjunct Professor, Center
for Peace and Security Studies, Georgetown University,
testifying on his own behalf; Ms. Lauren Ploch Blanchard,
Specialist in African Affairs, Congressional Research Service,
The Library of Congress; Mr. Brett Lovegrove, Chief Executive,
City Security and Resilience Network (CSARN); Mr. Richard W.
Stanek, Sheriff, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Mr. Richard
Mellor, Vice President, Loss Prevention, National Retail
Federation; and Ms. Stephanie Sanok Kostro, Senior Fellow and
Acting Director, Homeland Security and Counterterrorism
Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies.

BORDER SECURITY

Border security is about much more than illegal
immigration; it is about safeguarding this country from
terrorism, drug cartels, weapons and human smuggling and
protecting the free flow of legitimate trade. It is more
important than ever to know who and what is coming into the
United States. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has
never created a national strategy to secure our borders. In the
absence of a complete border security strategy that encompasses
the entire border, illicit cross-border activity quickly adapts
and moves when isolated areas are secured. Throughout the First
Session, the Committee has actively examined the key elements
of border security including the definition of a secure border,
border security metrics and measures, visa security and
overstays, the implementation of a biometric exit system, cargo
security, maritime security, and the future of the
Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC).
As the Senate considered reform of the U.S. immigration
system, the Committee examined proposals to enhance border
security. S. 7.44, the Senate's immigration bill included some
provisions related to border security. The Senate's approach
puts a heavy emphasis on spending resources, with limited
accountability or ability to measure outcomes of those applied
resources. The Senate bill spends an additional $46 billion
dollars to: Double the size of the U.S. Border Patrol; build
additional miles of fence; and purchase new technology. H.R.
1417, the Committee's border security legislation, calls for a
strategy and an implementation plan to be produced prior to the
expenditure of additional resources. It also requires metrics
to increase accountability, and applies a standard of no less
than 90 percent effectiveness to hold the Department
accountable. For further action on H.R. 1417, see discussion
above.
Members of the Committee conducted a site visit to the
Southwest Border from August 3 through 6, 2013. The purpose of
the site visit was to examine current border security
conditions, including the maritime environment. Members
experienced operations in the maritime domain, urban
environment border security infrastructure, Unmanned Aerial
Vehicle (UAV) operations, and border security challenges in the
Rio Grande Valley. In San Diego, California, Members examined
U. S. Coast Guard port security operations, conducted an aerial
tour of the international border, and a ground operational
environment and infrastructure tour.
While in Tucson, Arizona, Members toured various facilities
including: the Tucson Joint Field Command and Predator
Operations Center; a demonstration of advanced Integrated Fixed
Tower technologies, in Sasabe; and received an overview of UAV
operations at Fort Huachuca.
Members then traveled to Texas to the Rio Grande Valley to
participate in border terrain tours with local law enforcement,
receive briefings on the South Texas Campaign and the Texas
National Guard on RC-26 fixed-wing aerial detection and
monitoring operations supporting the Department of Homeland
Security.
During this session, the Committee received updates on the
Arizona Technology Plan and successfully pushed for the
Department of Defense to re-deploy aerostats DHS for assessment
in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. The Committee is optimistic
that Mexican government reforms will provide new economic
opportunities so that its citizens will choose stable, viable
jobs, especially in the energy industry, instead of joining
criminal cartels operating along the Mexico-United States
Border. The Committee will continue to push the Department to
secure our borders in the North, South, and the Caribbean
region.

PROTECTING THE NATION'S CYBERSECURITY

Other threats to our Nation do not cross our physical
borders--they instead invade our digital networks. Cyber-
attacks are becoming an increasing threat to the homeland.
Countries steal our military and intelligence information;
there are threats of cyber-warfare from terrorists, economic
cyber attacks from the Islamic Republic of Iran and the
People's Republic of China and, even the possibility of an
attack upon our utilities is a growing vulnerability. Yet,
while threats are imminent, no major cybersecurity legislation
has been enacted since 2002. The Secretary of Homeland
Security, was made responsible for ``coordinating the overall
national effort to enhance the protection of our critical
infrastructure'' when the Department itself was established.
The National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) and
Executive Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure
Cybersecurity issued in February 2013 solidified the
Department's role as the lead Federal entity in protecting
domestic critical infrastructure.
Upon issuance of Executive Order 13636 and Presidential
Policy Directive (PPD)-21, Critical Infrastructure Security and
Resilience, the Committee received briefings on these documents
from DHS. On March 13, 2013, the Committee held a hearing
entitled ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and Responsibilities to
Protect the Nation's Critical Infrastructure.'' The Committee
received testimony from Hon. Jane Holl Lute, Deputy Secretary,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Anish B. Bhimani,
Chairman, Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis
Center; Mr. Gary W. Hayes, Chief Information Officer,
Centerpoint Energy; and Ms. Michelle Richardson, Legislative
Counsel, American Civil Liberties Union.
The Committee spent considerable time developing
cybersecurity legislation. Members and staff held hundreds of
stakeholder meetings with the Department as well as technology
and privacy organizations to get their insights and
perspectives. The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection and Security Technologies held numerous hearings on
Executive Order 13636, the National Cybersecurity and
Communications Integration Center (NCCIC), the Cybersecurity
Framework, sharing threat information while ensuring privacy
and civil liberties, partnering with the privacy sector, and
coordinating a cyber incident response.
As the Nation approached key Affordable Care Act milestones
during 2013, the Committee raised security and privacy concerns
prior to problems as healthcare.gov went live in October. The
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies held hearings in July and September on
healthcare.gov and the Health Exchange Data Hub. On November 8,
Committee staff also received a briefing from the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Office of
Cybersecurity and Communications on Department of Homeland
Security roles in the implementation of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act. On November 13, 2013, the Full
Committee held a hearing entitled ``Cyber Side-Effects: How
Secure is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed
Healthcare.gov?'' The Committee received testimony from Ms.
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary,
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Ms. Soraya Correa, Associate Director,
Enterprise Services Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr.
Luke Chung, President, FMS, Inc.; and Mr. Waylon Krush, Chief
Executive Officer, Lunarline, Inc. In preparation for this
hearing, Committee staff met with stakeholders to discuss
technical flaws with healthcare.gov.

DHS MANAGEMENT

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Committee actively monitored the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) management and operations to ensure that it is
functioning more efficiently and is accountable to the American
people. The Committee met with DHS headquarters and many
components to examine management practices in acquisition,
financial management, information technology, human capital,
and employee integrity. During the First Session, the
Department had to navigate the complex impacts of
sequestration, the first government shutdown in the
Department's young history, and significant senior leadership
resignations. The Committee has been vocal about the need for
key Department leadership positions to be filled. On March 5,
2013, the Chairman and Ranking Member sent a letter the
President urging him to swiftly appoint an Inspector General at
DHS. With over 40 percent of the senior leadership positions
vacant, the Chairman wrote an opinion editorial discussing DHS
leadership vacancies that appeared in the Monday, November 11,
2013, edition of The Wall Street Journal.
On December 12, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing
entitled ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications of Leadership
Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.'' The Committee received
testimony from Hon. Tom J. Ridge, Former Secretary, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Max Stier, President and
CEO, Partnership for Public Service; Mr. David C. Maurer,
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government
Accountability Office; and Ms. Colleen M. Kelley, National
President, The National Treasury Employees Union.
As part of the Committee's oversight responsibilities,
Committee staff reviewed the President's budget request for the
Department of Homeland Security for Fiscal Year 2014, and on
April 18, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled
``The President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon.
Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
In light of the Government Accountability Office's (GAO)
2013 High-Risk report which identified financial management
within the Department as high risk, on February 20, 2013, the
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight
and Management Efficiency, and the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies, sent a letter to DHS's Chief Financial Officer
regarding the Department's financial management systems and
efforts to obtain a clean audit opinion on its financial
statements. The Department provided a response to this letter
on March 8, 2013. On March 11, 2013, Committee staff received a
briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer. The GAO issued its
report DHS Financial Management: Additional Efforts Needed to
Resolve Deficiencies in Internal Controls and Financial
Management Systems on September 30, 2013, [GAO-13-561]. The
report contained four recommendations for executive action. On
July 8, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from DHS's
Chief Financial Officer regarding DHS's efforts to modernize
its financial systems. To further examine these issues, on
November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiency held a hearing entitled ``DHS Financial Management:
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Asif Khan, Director,
Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. Government
Accountability Office; and Ms. Anne Richards, Assistant
Inspector General for Audits, Office of Inspector General, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was
to examine relevant GAO and Inspector General findings on DHS
financial practices, including steps to obtain a clean audit
opinion and implement financial management systems.
On August 1, 2013, the Undersecretary for Management, the
Chief Procurement Officer, the Acting Chief Information
Officer, and other senior officials briefed Committee staff on
the status of the Department's acquisition management efforts.
As a follow up, on September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on
Oversight and Management Efficiency held a hearing entitled
``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers
Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons Learned.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael Borras,
Undersecretary for Management, Department of Homeland Security;
Ms. Michele Mackin, Director, Government Accountability Office;
Ms. Anne Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, DHS
Office of Inspector General; Mr. William C. Greenwalt, Visiting
Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; Mr. Stan Soloway,
President and CEO, Professional Services Council; Mr. David
Berteau, Senior Vice President, Center for Strategic and
International Studies. The purpose of the hearing was to
examine DHS's acquisition practices to determine if the
Department is effectively implementing its policies and to
assess whether DHS could leverage best practices and lessons
learned from the Defense Department and the private sector. On
November 5, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency raised
concerns, in a letter to the Chief Procurement Officer, over
the Department's Enterprise Acquisition Gateway for Leading
Edge Solutions II (EAGLE II) and requested additional
information. The Department provided a written response on
December 2, 2013.
The Committee reviewed the authorities and activities of
the Chief Information Officer (CIO) to ensure the effective
management and coordination of key IT systems planning,
investment management, cloud computing, data consolidating,
operations, policy development, and related personnel
management. The Committee also examined component CIOs--
particularly Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and United States
Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS)--and their efforts to
modernize and implement critical IT systems supporting our
border agents and immigration officers. On February 21, 2013,
Committee staff received a briefing from DHS Office of
Inspector General concerning their ongoing IT Audits and IT
management issues. Committee staff also received briefings from
representatives from DHS, including: The DHS Chief Information
Officer; USCIS, including the USCIS Chief Information Officer;
CBP; and ICE, including the ICE Chief Information Officer. The
Committee reviewed the Department's efforts to address
information technology (IT) challenges, including the
management and integration of the Department's IT systems. The
Committee monitored the Department's progress in IT
architectural planning, investment management, and cloud
computing. On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS
Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration
Laws?'' The purpose of the hearing was to assess how IT
resources are being effectively utilized to help secure our
borders and uphold immigration laws and how the Department is
exercising proper management and oversight of its IT
investments. The Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency
additionally requested on May 23, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing
GAO review of the TECS modernization program--the Treasury
Enforcement Communication System. Committee staff also received
a briefing from the Office of Inspector General regarding its
investigation related to the DHS Chief Information Officer. On
August 22, 2013, Committee staff were briefed by the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on its
transportation infrastructure modernization efforts, which
seeks to update TSA IT infrastructure in maritime, surface, and
aviation environments.
On November 14, 2013, DHS officials briefed the Committee
on their approach to Integrated Investment Life Cycle
Management (IILCM). The IILCM is the Department's
transformational concept to integrate all phases of the
Department's multi-billion dollar budget and investment/
acquisition management process. The framework provides critical
linkages between Strategy, Capabilities and Requirements,
Programming and Budgeting, and Investment Oversight phases to
ensure the effective execution of Federal funds to support
strategic priorities. The IILCM was signed into policy by
Secretary Napolitano in February 2013 and the framework is
being piloted through March 2014 using the cybersecurity,
biodefense, and common vetting portfolios. The Committee will
continue to monitor the progress of these pilot initiatives.
On November 15, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and
the Subcommittees sent a letter to the Acting Secretary to
ensure the second Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR)
addresses critical homeland security issues and relevant
recommendations. During the second session, the Committee
eagerly awaits the completion of the second QHSR to set the
priorities and direction of the Department in the coming years.

FY 2014 BUDGET REQUEST

As part of the Committee's oversight responsibilities,
Committee staff reviewed the President's budget request for the
Department of Homeland Security for Fiscal Year 2014, and on
April 18, 2013, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled
``The President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon.
Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
Based on a Committee staff review of the President's budget
request for FY 2014 and testimony received, the Committee
completed its Views and Estimates of the President's budget
request and submitted them to the House Budget Committee for
its consideration.

2014 WINTER OLYMPIC GAMES SECURITY

On November 6 and 7, 2013, the Committee sent a staff
delegation to visit Sochi, Russian Federation, to investigate
security at the 2014 Olympic game venues and determine how the
Department of Homeland Security may support this event. Because
of the heightened security concerns surrounding the Olympic
games, the Committee is considering a future hearing on DHS'
role in supporting the security of approximately 15,000
Americans, both athletes and visitors, at the Olympics. The
Committee is also investigating the threats from the Caucasus
Emirate (Imarat Kavkaz--Russian name), a Chechnyan terrorist
group affiliated with al-Qaeda, which has threatened the 2014
Winter Olympic games.

----------

Full Committee Hearings Held

``A New Perspective on Threats to the Homeland.'' February 13,
2013. (Serial No. 113-1)
``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and Responsibilities to Protect the
Nation's Critical Infrastructure.'' March 6, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-4)
``The President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security.'' April 18, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
11)
``The Boston Bombings: A First Look.'' May 9, 2013. (Serial No.
113-16)
``Assessing Attacks on the Homeland: From Fort Hood to
Boston.'' July 10 and 11, 2013. (Serial No. 113-16)
``Crisis in Syria: Implications for Homeland Security.''
September 10, 2013. (Serial No. 113-32)
``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How Westerners Joining Terror
Groups Overseas Affect the Homeland.'' October 9, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-38)
``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure is the Personal Information
Entered into the Flawed Healthcare.gov?'' November 13,
2013. (Serial No. 113-41)
``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications of Leadership Vacancies on
the Mission and Morale.'' December 12, 2013. (Serial
No. 113-46)
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence held four
hearings, receiving testimony from 19 witnesses.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

WMD INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SHARING ACT OF 2013

H.R.1542

Summary

This legislation requires the Department of Homeland
Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis to support the
analysis and dissemination of information regarding threats
involving chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
weapons throughout the Department and among other Federal,
State, local, and private sector partners.

Legislative History

112th Congress
H.R.2764 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2011, by
Mr.Meehan, Ms.Speier, Mr.Pascrell, Mr.Marino, Mr.King of New
York, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred to the Committee
on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2764 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.
The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
considered H.R.2764 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2764 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.2764 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-466.
The House considered H.R.2764 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.2764 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

113th Congress
H.R. 1542 was introduced in the House on April 24, 2013, by
Mr.Meehan, Ms. Speier, Mr. McCaul, Mr. King of New York, and
Mr.Higgins, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 1542 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The House considered H.R. 1542 under Suspension of the
Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 388 yeas
and 3 nays, (Roll No. 375).
H.R. 1542 was received in the Senate on July 23, 2014, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

U.S. COUNTERTERRORISM STRATEGY

The Subcommittee continued its review of homeland security
and counterterrorism efforts across the Federal Government to
counter the threat from al-Qaeda and other terrorist networks.
The Committee conducted a series of meetings, briefings,
and site visits to review U.S. counterterrorism efforts aimed
at disrupting and reducing threats to the U.S. homeland from
al-Qaeda and other Islamic terror groups.
On May 21, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
New York City, New York (NYC) to discuss ongoing
counterterrorism activities and coordination efforts between
NYC and the Department of Homeland Security.
On June 4, 2013, Committee staff met with former U.S.
Government intelligence officials regarding counterterrorism
strategies, as well as current and potential future terror
threats.
On July 30, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
the Department of Homeland Security, Office of Bombing
Prevention to discuss their role and capability in providing
training and information to State and local law enforcement
regarding identifying and disabling improvised explosive
devices (IEDs). The tragic events of April 15, 2013, where
terrorists exploded two IEDs at the Boston Marathon, as well as
the growing use of vehicle-born improvised explosive devices,
highlight the need for the Nation to increase efforts to detect
and disable these devices.
On September 10, 2013, Committee staff attended a
conference hosted by the American Enterprise Institute on the
current capabilities of al-Qaeda and what changes are necessary
to the current counterterror strategies moving forward.
On October 28, 2013, Committee staff received a classified
briefing from Department of Homeland Security officials
regarding the Department's roles and responsibilities related
to terrorism detainees held at Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba.

THREATS TO THE U.S. HOMELAND FROM AL-QAEDA

The Committee has examined the continued threat to the U.S.
homeland from: Al Qaeda core; al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
(AQAP); al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM); and other
emerging allied and affiliated organizations.
On May 22, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Assessing the Threat to the Homeland from al-Qaeda Operations
in Iran and Syria.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Seth G. Jones, Ph.D., Associate Director, International
Security and Defense Policy Center; Mr. Robin Simcox, Research
Fellow, The Henry Jackson Society; Mr. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior
Fellow, Foundation for the Defense of Democracies; and Mr.
Barak Barfi, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
In preparation for the May 22nd hearing, Committee staff
met with a number of outside experts on the situation in the
Syrian Arab Republic and potential threats to the Nation. These
meetings include the Institute of the Study of War on May 8,
2013, the RAND Corporation on May 10, 2013, and the Henry
Jackson Society on May 14, 2013.
On June 27, 2103, Members of the Subcommittee received a
classified briefing on terror threats to the Homeland. Members
were briefed by representatives from the Department of Homeland
Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
The Subcommittee conducted oversight after an al-Qaeda-
linked threat report in August 2013, lead to the closure of
nearly two-dozen U.S. Embassies across the Middle East and
North Africa for approximately one week with the U.S. Embassy
in Sanaa, the Yemeni Republic remaining closed for two weeks.
Committee staff met with numerous Government and private sector
experts on the threat information and the relationship between
al-Qaeda senior leadership and the affiliate organizations,
particularly AQAP.
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Understanding the Threat to the Homeland from
AQAP.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Frank J.
Cilluffo, Associate Vice President, Director, Homeland Security
Policy Institute and Co-Director, Cyber Center for National and
Economic Security, The George Washington University.; Ms.
Katherine Zimmerman, Senior Analyst Critical Threats Project,
The American Enterprise Institute; and Mr. Brian Katulis,
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.

AL QAEDA IN THE SINAI

On October 21 and 22, 2013, Committee staff met with
outside experts from the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy on the presence and capability of jihadist entities in
the Arab Republic of Egypt, particularly in the Sinai
Peninsula. The meetings included a discussion of the impact of
Administration's decision to limit military aid to Egypt.
On October 30, 2013, Committee staff met with experts from
the Council on Foreign Relations regarding security concerns in
the Sinai and the potential threat to the U.S. Homeland and
western interests from terrorist groups operating in the
region.

MUMBAI-STYLE ATTACKS AND LASHKAR-E-TAIBA

On June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks and the
Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. Joseph W. Pfeifer, Chief of Counterterrorism
and Emergency Preparedness, Fire Department of New York; C.
Christine Fair, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Georgetown
University, Security Studies Program in the Edumnd A. Walsh
School of Foreign Service; Stephen Tankel, Ph.D., Assistant
Professor, American University and Nonresident Scholar, South
Asia Program, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; and
Jonah Blank, Ph.D., Senior Political Analyst, The RAND
Corporation.
In preparation for the June 12th hearing, Committee staff
met with a number of outside experts regarding the capability
and intentions of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Additionally, the
Committee staff received a classified briefing on June 5, 2013,
and met with representatives from the Combating Terrorism
Center at West Point U.S. Military Academy regarding the threat
to the homeland posed by LeT.

AL SHABAAB

The Subcommittee continued its review of the terror threat
posed by Somali-based al-Shabaab. On September 21, 2013,
terrorists entered the Westgate mall in Nairobi, the Republic
of Kenya and killed almost 70 and injured over 200 people
during a four-day period. Al-Shabaab has claimed responsibility
for the attack.
On September 30, 2013, Committee staff met with an expert
from the Atlantic Council regarding threats from al-Shabaab and
lessons learned regarding the intentions and capability from
the group after the Westgate Mall terror attack.

BOKO HARAM

The Subcommittee has conducted extensive oversight over the
Nigerian terror group Boko Haram and the U.S. process for
designating foreign terrorist organizations (FTO).
On September 13, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee,
and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and
the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection
and Security Technologies, sent an oversight letter to the
Department of State urging the Department to move forward with
a FTO designation for Boko Haram and Ansar al Sharia, a
splinter group.
On September 11, 2013, Committee staff met with officials
from the Department of Defense's African Command regarding
capabilities and threats to the Nation from Boko Haram.
On September 13, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and
the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies released a report on the growing threat
to the homeland from Boko Haram. The Members shared a copy of
the report in a letter to the Secretary of State.
On September 30, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee and
the Chair of the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation,
and Trade of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, requested
the Government Accountability Office conduct a review of the
FTO designation process. The Department of State designated
Boko Haram as an FTO on November 13, 2013.

THREAT TO THE HOMELAND FROM IRAN AND HEZBOLLAH

In February 2013, Committee staff met with a number of
individuals from the Lebanese-American community to discuss the
capability and threat posed by Hezbollah to the U.S. Homeland.
On May 22, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Assessing the Threat to the Homeland from al-Qaeda Operations
in Iran and Syria.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Seth G. Jones, Ph.D., Associate Director, International
Security and Defense Policy Center; Mr. Robin Simcox, Research
Fellow, The Henry Jackson Society; Mr. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior
Fellow, Foundation for the Defense of Democracies; and Mr.
Barak Barfi, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
In preparation for the May 22nd hearing, Committee staff
met with a number of outside experts on the situation in Syria
and potential threats to the U.S. Homeland. These meetings
include the Institute of the Study of War on May 8, 2013, the
RAND Corporation on May 10, 2013, and the Henry Jackson Society
on May 14, 2013.

HOMEGROWN TERRORIST THREAT

The Subcommittee continued oversight over the threat from
homegrown extremists. On May 6, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Center regarding
online radicalization recruitment. On July 8, 2013, Committee
staff met with representatives from the Bipartisan Policy
Center regarding the role the internet played in the
radicalizing the terrorists involved in the Boston Bombings.

ECONOMIC THREATS

The Subcommittee conducted oversight over the Committee on
Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) process,
including review of a proposal by a state-owned foreign company
to build a factory in the United States. Committee staff met
with officials from CFIUS and the Intelligence Community, as
well as representatives from the state where the factory was
under consideration.

TERRORIST TRAVEL

On January 17, 2013, Committee staff conducted a conference
call with Department of Homeland Security personnel stationed
overseas regarding the Visa Security Program and
counterterrorism concerns.
On February 25, 2013, Committee staff met with Department
of Homeland Security personnel from Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regarding their databases used to track travel
into and out of the United States, as well as CBP's policies
and procedures for creating and removing terrorist alerts.

TERROR FINANCE

On January 17, 2013, Committee staff met with personnel
from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding past and IRS
investigations into terror finance cases. Additionally, the
meeting included an overview of IRS policy and procedures for
investigating non-profit entities with potential ties to
terrorist organizations.

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS

On March 28, 2013, Committee staff met with the Defense
Security Service within the Department of Defense regarding
their annual classified trends analysis on counterintelligence
threats across the Federal Government, including the Department
of Homeland Security. This session, several individuals have
damaged National security or committed tragic acts of violence,
emphasizing the need for reforms and rigorous oversight over
the security clearance process and programs to detect insider
threats. In May 2013, Edward Snowden, a contractor with the
National Security Agency, fled the U.S. to Hong Kong and later
to the Russian Federation leaking a large amount of information
on classified surveillance programs. On September 16, 2013,
Aaron Alexis, a contractor with the Navy shot his way into the
Washington D.C. Navy Yard and killed 12 people. Both of these
individuals were vetted, trusted U.S. security professionals
who abused that trust and committed heinous acts.
The Department of Homeland Security has over 120,000
employees holding security clearances. The Subcommittee
conducted oversight over the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) and Federal processes for investigating and adjudicating
security clearances.
On September 27, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from the DHS Office of Security on the Department's process for
requesting and adjudicating security clearances and suitability
checks for employees, and how the Office coordinates with
Department component agencies.
On October 28, 2013, Committee staff received a classified
briefing from the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis on
their Counter Intelligence program.
On October 24, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Assistant
Commissioner for Internal Affairs regarding CBP programs. The
briefing provided staff with information as to how the
Department determines the suitability of employees, adjudicates
security clearances, and manages the polygraph program.
On November 1, 2013, Committee staff met with officials
from the Government Accountability Office regarding
vulnerabilities in the security clearance process.
On November 12, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives from a private company with contracts to
conduct security clearance background investigations for the
Office of Personnel Management and DHS.
On November 13, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``The Insider Threat to Homeland Security: Examining
Our Nation's Security Clearance Processes.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr. Merton W. Miller, Associate
Director of Investigations, Federal Investigative Services,
U.S. Office of Personnel Management; Mr. Gregory Marshall,
Chief Security Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Mr. Brian Prioletti, Assistant Director, Special Security
Directorate, National Counterintelligence Executive, Office of
Director of National Intelligence; and Ms. Brenda S. Farrell,
Director, Defense Capabilities and Management, Military and DOD
Civilian Personnel Issues, U.S. Government Accountability
Office.

HOMELAND THREAT FROM A CBRN ATTACK

On March 5, 2013, Committee staff received a classified
briefing from the Federal Bureau of Investigations regarding
the threat weapons of mass destruction pose to the Nation.
On April 12, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) to examine
resources in their FY 2014 budget request.
On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, Biological,
Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the Homeland.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Richard Daddario,
Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism, New York City Police
Department; Dr. Huban Gowadia, Acting Director, Domestic
Nuclear Detection Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Mr. Scott McAllister, Deputy Under Secretary, State and Local
Program Officer, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security; and Dr. Leonard Cole, Newark,
New Jersey.
On May 16, 2013, Committee staff met with experts from
Sandia National Laboratories regarding the threat from
biological pathogens and the threat to the Homeland.
The Subcommittee discharged H.R. 1542, the WMD Intelligence
and Information Sharing Act of 2013, legislation designed to
address the issue of CBRN attacks. This bill passed the House
on July 22, 2013, for further information, see the discussion
of this measure listed above.
On September 6, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Center regarding a
new report on emerging threats.

HOMELAND SECURITY INTELLIGENCE ENTERPRISE

The Subcommittee held multiple briefings with officials
from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of
Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) to examine the structure,
mission, and capability of the office, as well as I&As role in
coordinating intelligence within DHS and State and local law
enforcement.
On March 22, 2013, Committee staff received a classified
briefing with officials from I&A regarding the DHS Intelligence
Enterprise and how intelligence analysis responsibilities are
divided between components of the Department.
On April 12, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the Office of
Operations regarding their FY 2014 budget request and the
mission, resources, and capabilities of their respective
offices.
On May 17, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding the capabilities
and policies related to the primary database used by CBP to
track travel in and out of the U.S. and identifying potential
terrorists.
On June 6, 2013, Committee staff received a classified
briefing from officials at the National Counterterrorism Center
regarding terrorist watchlisting protocols and information
sharing.
On July 12, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Government Accountability Office regarding a Committee
requested report on the DHS Intelligence Enterprise.
On July 16, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
Immigration and Customs Enforcement regarding the agency's
analytic framework for intelligence.
On July 17, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
the Federal Bureau of Investigations regarding the network of
Joint Terrorism Task Forces.

INFORMATION SHARING

The Subcommittee conducted extensive oversight over
information sharing between Federal, State, and local law
enforcement.
On March 28, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
the National Fusion Center Association.
On April 15, 2013, Committee staff met with officials from
the Department of Homeland Security regarding the National
Network of Fusion Centers.
On May 17, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Government Accountability Office regarding their
ongoing work reviewing information sharing and counterterrorism
activities between the Joint Terrorism Task Forces and Fusion
Centers.
On June 17, 2013, Committee staff met with the Director of
Analysis for the Office of Intelligence and Analysis within the
Department of Homeland Security to receive a briefing on the
size and mission of the office. The briefing included an
overview of new intelligence products and information sharing
efforts with State and local law enforcement.
On June 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a classified threat
briefing for Members on terror threats to the Homeland.
Representatives from the Department of Homeland Security,
Office of Intelligence and Analysis provided the threat
briefing and an overview of the analytical products produced by
their office, as well as discussed the process by which threat
information is shared with State and local law enforcement
officials.
On July 26, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee released a Majority Staff Report entitled ``The
National Network of Fusion Centers,'' detailing the Committee's
findings and recommendations developed from a comprehensive
study of fusions centers across the country. In developing the
report, Committee staff conducted numerous briefings and site
visits with Fusion Centers, the Department of Homeland
Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and other
entities.
On September 25, 2013, Committee staff met with officials
from the Department of Homeland Security regarding the 2012
National Network of Fusion Centers Assessment.
On November 14, 2013, Committee staff met with Federal,
State, and local law enforcement regarding security measures
and information sharing efforts in advance of Super Bowl XLVIII
to be played on February 2, 2014.

NATIONAL SECURITY LEAKS

Following up on a Committee investigation into the homeland
security impacts of national security leaks that began in the
112th Congress, the Subcommittee held numerous briefings and
oversight letters. This includes February 13, 2013 and a June
18, 2013 meetings with the Department of Defense (DOD)
Inspector General's Office regarding their review of the DOD
policies and procedures for working with the media and movie
producers.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical, Biological,
Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the
Homeland.'' March 23, 2013. (Serial No. 113-12)
``Assessing the Threat to the Homeland from al-Qaeda Operations
in Iran and Syria.'' May 22, 2013. (Serial No. 113-19)
``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks and the
Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.'' June 12, 2013. (Serial
No. 113-21)
``Understanding the Threat to the Homeland from AQAP.''
September 18, 2013. (Serial No. 113-34)
``The Insider Threat to Homeland Security: Examining Our
Nation's Security Clearance Processes.'' November 13,
2013. (Serial No. 113-42)
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security held seven
hearings, receiving testimony from 29 witnesses, and considered
one measure.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

BORDER SECURITY RESULTS ACT OF 2013

H.R. 1417 (S. 683)

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control
of the international borders of the United States, and for
other purposes.

Summary

H.R. 1417 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to
develop a comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain
situational awareness and operational control of the border,
and sets the requirement of achieving operational control in
high traffic areas within two years and nine months of
enactment and across the entire Southwest border within five
years. Operational control of the border, as defined by the
bill, means a condition where there is a 90 percent
effectiveness rate for the apprehension of illegal border
crossers and a significant reduction in the movement of illicit
drugs and other contraband.
This legislation sets the requirements for the Secretary to
consider when developing the strategy; outlines the benchmarks
and timetables for achieving situational awareness and
operational control; and requires metrics to measure
effectiveness. H.R. 1417 also requires the Secretary to issue a
baseline assessment of the current level of situational
awareness and operational control of the border and
periodically thereafter until the border is deemed to be under
operational control. Following the baseline assessment, the
Secretary would be required to submit a comprehensive strategy
and subsequent plan to gain situational awareness and
operational control. The plan would be comprised of
implementation plans for each of the Department's border
security components and a comprehensive border security
technology plan outlining a justification for technology
choices and a timetable for procurement and deployment. This
legislation also calls for periodic updates of the strategy and
implementation plan following the publication of future
Quadrennial Homeland Security Review.
H.R. 1417 requires the Secretary to implement a series of
metrics to measure the effectiveness of security between the
ports of entry, at ports of entry, and in the maritime
environment. H.R. 1417 also requires a Department of Homeland
Security National Laboratory and a Department of Homeland
Security Center of Excellence to provide an independent
assessment of the suitability of the metrics the Department
develops, and to make recommendations for additional metrics to
measure border security effectiveness.
Finally, the legislation requires the Government
Accountability Office to review and report to Congress on the
suitability and validity of the Secretary's strategy, plan,
metrics, and the certification of operational control.

Legislative History

H.R. 1417 was introduced in the House on April 9, 2013, by
Mr. McCaul, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Mr.
Thompson of Mississippi and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1417 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security. S. 683,
the Senate companion measure was introduced on April 9, 2013,
and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs. The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security considered
H.R. 1417 on April 24, 2013, and ordered the measure
reported to the Full Committee with a favorable recommendation,
as amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security considered H.R. 1417 on
May 15, 2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House with a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice
vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 1417 to the House on May 20,
2013 as H. Rpt. 113-87, and placed on the Union Calendar,
Calendar No. 62.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

SECURE BORDER

Security of the Nation hinges in large part on how well the
Department of Homeland Security can control who and what comes
into this country. A porous border is a conduit for not only
drug smugglers and human traffickers, but is also a
vulnerability that terrorists may exploit. The Department's
lack of a comprehensive national strategy to secure the border
and no defined measurable goals limits its ability to fulfill
this critical mission. The number of Border Patrol agents,
miles of fence, and various technology that Congress has funded
to help shore up security at the border is a means to an end.
The border is not necessarily ``secure'' because 21,370 agents
are on the border, nor is it necessarily secure because
apprehensions are the lowest they have been since the 1970s.
Instead, the Department must define the characteristics of a
secure border and establish a desired border security end-state
the Department can plan for and execute against.
On February 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``What Does a Secure Border Look Like?'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Michael J. Fisher,
Chief, Border Patrol, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.
Kevin McAleenan, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security; RAdm William D. Lee, Deputy For Operations
Policy and Capabilities, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security; Ms. Rebecca Gambler, Acting Director,
Homeland Security and Justice, Government Accountability
Office; and Marc R. Rosenblum, PhD, Specialist in Immigration
Policy, Congressional Research Service, The Library of
Congress. The purpose of this hearing was to take a holistic
look at the border to define what a secure border looks like,
assess what the Department needs to do to achieve a secure
border and how to measure border security progress.

STATE OF BORDER SECURITY

More than ten years after the creation of the Department of
Homeland Security, the Department does not have a comprehensive
national strategy to secure the border. Since the attacks of
September 11, 2001, Congress has appropriated billions of
dollars to enhance border security, primarily through new
investments in personnel, technology, and infrastructure. These
investments were made without the benefit of a national border
security strategy, so funds were often expended in an ad hoc
way, without a well-defined end state. Achieving greater border
security must be based on a solid understanding of current
border threats, particularly as they relate to illegal border
crossings and trafficking of contraband, and the coordination
of components.
Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations and
Office of Air and Marine, Border Patrol, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Government
Accountability Office, to discuss topics related to border
security including: technology, strategy, metrics, and reuse of
DoD equipment.
On March 13, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee received
a briefing on the state of border security. Representatives
from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, and the U.S. Coast Guard were present to
provide Members with an update on border security efforts and
respond to Member concerns. The purpose of this briefing was to
better understand the current state of border security efforts
from all the Department of Homeland Security components with a
role in border security and to identify the need for a National
strategy to secure the border.

BORDER SECURITY MEASURES

In 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stopped
reporting the number of miles border under ``operational
control.'' Since that time, DHS has failed to introduce the
``Border Condition Index'' (BCI), a new measure intended to
demonstrate border security in a more holistic way, or another,
alternative metric. Instead, the Department has relied on
incomplete or inconsistent measures of border security
progress, such as the resources sent to the border or the
number of people apprehended. The development of outcome-based
border security metrics at and between the ports of entry and
in the maritime environment are necessary to increase
confidence that the Nation's border security efforts are based
on measurable data.
Committee staff met with representatives from U.S. Customs
and Border Protection Office of Field Operations and Office of
Air and Marine, Border Patrol, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Government
Accountability Office to discuss how the Department's border
security components measure effectiveness.
On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Measuring Outcomes to Understand the State of Border
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.
Michael J. Fisher, Chief, Border Patrol, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. Kevin McAleenan, Acting Assistant Commissioner,
Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Mark Borkowski, Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; and Hon. Veronica Escobar, County Judge, El Paso
County, Texas. The purpose of this hearing was to examine the
status of the Border Condition Index (BCI), and further examine
outcome-based ways to measure the state of border security.

VISA SECURITY AND OVERSTAYS

Much of the focus on border security is devoted to the
southwest border; however, estimates show approximately 40
percent of the estimated 11-12 million aliens unlawfully
present in the United States entered legally and subsequently
overstayed their visas. According to the Department of Justice,
approximately 10 percent of all the individuals who have been
convicted on terrorism-related charges in the decade since the
attacks of September 11, 2001, were legal visitors who
overstayed their visas demonstrating a significant
vulnerability. All of the 9/11 hijackers entered the United
States on legally valid visas and at least four had overstayed
or were in violation of their status.
Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Government
Accountability Office to receive briefs as to how the
Department accounts for the population of persons who overstay
their visas and how to make progress in providing for exit
data.
On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Visa Security and Overstays: How Secure is America?'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. John Wagner, Acting
Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations,
Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. James Dinkins, Executive Associate Director,
Homeland Security Investigations, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Rebecca
Gambler, Director of the Homeland Security and Justice,
Government Accountability Office; and Mr. Shonnie Lyon, Acting
Director, Office of Biometric Identity Management, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security. The purpose of this hearing was to examine
the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to secure
the border by addressing challenges in identifying individuals
who overstay their visas.

THE FUTURE OF THE TWIC PROGRAM

Implementation of the Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) continues to be plagued by challenges due to
poor planning, technological hurdles, and lack of leadership by
the Transportation Security Administration and the U.S. Coast
Guard (USCG). Pilot programs that were designed to assist the
USCG to issue the required regulatory rules to make the program
operate as envisioned by the Congress have been less than
successful. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has
issued several reports on the shortfalls of the TWIC program
and called into question the overall security value of the
program stating, ``DHS has not demonstrated how, if at all,
TWIC will improve maritime security.'' [GAO-13-198]. Millions
of dollars of previously allocated and future grant spending
are predicated on the TWIC providing a tangible security
benefit at the Nation's ports and maritime facilities.
Committee staff met with representatives from TSA, USCG and
GAO to discuss the challenges facing the TWIC program and what
the intent is for future deployment of technologies and
improved customer service. On June 18, 2013, the Subcommittee
held a hearing entitled ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: The
Future of the TWIC Program.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from RADM Joseph A. Servidio, Assistant Commandant
for Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Mr. Steve Sadler, Assistant Administrator,
Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Transportation Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr.
Stephen M. Lord, Director, Forensic Audits and Investigative
Services, U.S. Government Accountability Office; and Capt.
Marcus Woodring, USCG (ret), Managing Director, Health, Safety,
Security and Environmental, Port of Houston Authority. The
purpose of this hearing was to reexamine the security value of
the TWIC card and determine the future of the program.

BORDER SECURITY

It is imperative that lessons learned from prior
immigration reform efforts inform current proposals for
immigration reform. The Senate's immigration bill, S. 744,
emphasizes resources, with limited accountability or
requirements to measure outcomes of those resources. The Senate
bill spends an additional $46 billion dollars to: Double the
size of the U.S. Border Patrol; build additional miles of
fence; and purchase new technology.
H.R. 1417, the Committee's border security legislation,
calls for a strategy and an implementation plan to be produced
prior to the expenditure of additional resources. It also
requires metrics to increase accountability, and applies a
standard of no less than 90 percent effectiveness to hold the
Department accountable.
Committee staff met with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Office of Field Operations, U.S. Border Patrol, U.S. Coast
Guard, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the
Government Accountability Office for briefings on the effect
that various border security bills would have on their
components.
On June 23, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``A Study in Contrasts: House and Senate Approaches to Border
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John
Cornyn, Senator, State of Texas; Hon. Xavier Bercerra, a
Representative in Congress from the 34th District, State of
California; Mr. Jayson Ahern, Principal, Chertoff Group; Mr.
Edward Alden, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow, Council on
Foreign Relations; and Mr. Richard M. Stana, Former Director,
Homeland Security and Justice, Government Accountability
Office. The purpose of this hearing was to assess the two
disparate border security approaches of the House and Senate,
and to better inform the legislation that is presented to the
Congress which seeks to achieve the outcome of a secure border.
For further action on H.R. 1417, see discussion above.

BIOMETRIC EXIT

Mandates for an electronic exit system designed to verify
when aliens on a valid visa depart the United States have
existed since 1996. While progress has been made on the
collection of fingerprints and photographs of aliens entering
the United States, the Department still does not collect
biometric information from individuals exiting the country.
Despite longstanding Congressional mandates, DHS has not
implemented a biometric exit system. Instead the Department has
focused on a less expensive ``biographic'' (matching names of
airline manifests) option. As a result, DHS has more than one
million ``unmatched'' records--records where the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection has entry, but no exit information on
aliens who entered into the country on a valid visa. Estimates
indicate that as many as 40 percent of all individuals
unlawfully present in the U.S. enter the country on a valid
visa and overstay their period of admittance. Any attempt to
fully secure the border must also address the challenge of
identifying and then removing visa overstays.
Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations to
receive briefings on the implementation of a biographic exit
program at air, land, and sea ports of entry/exit.
On September 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission Recommendation:
Implementing Biometric Exit.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. John Wagner, Acting Deputy Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, Customs and Border
Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. John
Woods, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and Ms. Rebecca Gambler,
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues, U.S. Government
Accountability Office. The purpose of this hearing was to
engage the Department of Homeland Security leadership on the
current state of biometric exit and to chart a path forward to
implement a system that is both a counterterrorism and border
security tool.

MARITIME SECURITY

As progress is made preventing illegal border crossings
along the land borders of the United States, Transnational
Criminal Organizations and have sought the path of least
resistance and have been utilizing maritime means to enter the
country. A serious threat to homeland security continues to be
the movement of illegal drugs in bulk through the Transit Zone
from South America through the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean.
Trafficking organizations are using advanced methods of
smuggling such as semi-submersibles and small vessels that are
increasingly difficult to detect. In constrained fiscal
environment, cooperative efforts to gain intelligence,
situational awareness across the Department's maritime agencies
is critical to securing the vast maritime borders of the
Nation.
Committee Staff met with representatives from the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Office of Air and Marine,
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), and the Government Accountability
Office, to discuss the following topics related to maritime
security: maritime domain awareness, threats in the maritime
environment, USCG and CBP asset recapitalization, maritime
strategy, and metrics.
On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``What Does a Secure Maritime Border Look Like?'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from RADM William D. Lee,
Deputy For Operations Policy and Capabilities, U.S. Coast
Guard, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen L.
Caldwell, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government
Accountability Office; and Capt. Marcus Woodring, (Ret. USCG),
Managing Director, Health, Safety, Security and Environmental,
Port of Houston Authority. The purpose of this hearing was to
examine: what DHS maritime components are doing to interdict
maritime threats before they arrive on shore or in U.S. ports:
what is being done to increase the Nation's understanding of
illicit networks that move in the maritime domain: DHS' layered
approach to secure the maritime environment; and how progress
is being measured.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``What Does a Secure Border Look Like?'' February 26, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-3)
``Measuring Outcomes to Understand the State of Border
Security.'' March 20, 2013. (Serial No. 113-8)
``Visa Security and Overstays: How Secure is America?'' May 21,
2013. (Serial No. 113-18)
``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability: The Future of the TWIC
Program.'' June 18, 2013. (Serial No. 113-23)
``A Study in Contrasts: House and Senate Approaches to Border
Security.'' July 23, 2013. (Serial No. 113-28)
``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission Recommendation: Implementing
Biometric Exit.'' September 26, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
37)
``What Does a Secure Maritime Border Look Like?'' November 19,
2013. (Serial No. 113-45)
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies held eight hearings, receiving testimony
from 34 witnesses, and considered two measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADVANCEMENT ACT OF
2013

H.R. 2952

Summary

H.R. 2952 directs the Department of Homeland Security to
facilitate the development of a Research and Development (R&D)
strategy for critical infrastructure security technologies.
This strategy will help our nation prioritize its investments
in those aspects of the infrastructure that are most at risk.
H.R. 2952 also directs the Secretary to explore the feasibility
of expanding the use of public-private R&D consortiums to
accelerate new security technologies and spur innovation and
economic combativeness. In addition, CIRDA will designate a
`Technology Clearinghouse' where proven security tools for
protecting infrastructure can be rapidly shared amongst
government and private partners.

Legislative History

H.R. 2952 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2013, by
Mr. Meehan, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 2952 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies.
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R.
2952 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 2952 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.

HOMELAND SECURITY CYBERSECURITY BOOTS-ON-THE-GROUND ACT

H.R. 3107

Summary

Legislative History

H.R. 3107 was introduced in the House on September 17,
2013, by Ms. Clarke, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 3107 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies.
On September 18, 2013, the Subcommittee considered H.R.
3107 and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a
favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 3107 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, as amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 3107 to the House on December
12, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-294.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

CYBER THREATS FROM CHINA, RUSSIA, AND IRAN

American critical infrastructure is under persistent cyber
attack from criminals, activists, and nation states intent on
compromising sensitive data or causing damage. One of the most
consequential cyber threats is a concentrated attack by a
nation state against key segments of American critical
infrastructure. In late 2012 and early 2013 a series of cyber
attacks, reportedly emanating from the Islamic Republic of
Iran, targeted the American financial services sector and
compromised the integrity and operation of several banks.
The Chair of the Subcommittee and Committee staff traveled
to New York, New York from February 7 through 8, 2013, to
receive briefings from representatives of the financial
services sector to examine the extent of the attacks and
effective remediation strategies, including improved Federal
cooperation.
On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Cyber Threats from China, Russia and Iran: Protecting
American Critical Infrastructure.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. Frank J. Cilluffo, Director, Homeland
Security Policy Institute and Co-Director, Cyber Center for
National and Economic Security, The George Washington
University; Mr. Richard Bejtlich, Chief Security Officer and
Security Services Architect, Mandiant; Mr. Ilan Berman, Vice
President, American Foreign Policy Council; and Mr. Martin C.
Libicki, Senior Management Scientist, RAND Corporation. The
purpose of this hearing was to examine the cybersecurity
threats to American critical infrastructure from key nation
states.

DHS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and
Technology (S&T) Directorate is the primary research and
development arm of the Department and manages science and
technology research, from development through transition, for
the Department's operational components and first responders to
protect the homeland.
On March 21, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee received
a briefing from representative from the Department's Science
and Technology Directorate. The purpose of this briefing was to
examine S&T's efforts to develop and promulgate new
technologies. As a result of this briefing, the Chair of the
Subcommittee introduced H.R. 2952, the Critical Infrastructure
Research and Development Advancement (CIRDA) Act of 2013, which
requires DHS to develop a strategic research and development
plan. See discussion of H.R. 2952, listed above.

CYBERSECURITY AND PRIVACY

The Subcommittee's effort to improve the Department of
Homeland Security's ability to oversee the cybersecurity of
Federal networks and other critical infrastructures is driven
by the paramount importance of protecting the integrity of
sensitive data, including personally identifiable information
(PII).
On April 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Striking the Right Balance: Protecting Our Nation's Critical
Infrastructure from Cyber Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil
Liberties.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. Mary
Ellen Callahan, Partner, Jenner & Block and Former Chief
Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Ms.
Cheri F. McGuire, Vice President, Global Government Affairs &
Cybersecurity Policy, Symantec; and Ms. Harriet Pearson,
Partner, Hogan Lovells. The purpose of this hearing was to
inform Members of the various privacy issues to be addressed in
crafting cybersecurity policy and proposed legislation.
On November 1, 2013, Subcommittee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the National Cybersecurity &
Communications Integration Center to examine the policies and
procedures used by the Department to protect PII.
Additionally, Committee staff held a series of meetings
with privacy experts, advocates, and other stakeholders to
inform oversight and craft legislative language to ensure the
Department adequately protects private information.

CYBER THREAT INFORMATION SHARING

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the declared
mission, and an FY 2013 budget of $896 million, to oversee the
security of Federal civilian networks (the ``.gov'' domain) and
aid private sector owners and operators of critical
infrastructure in protecting their systems from cyber threats.
The Subcommittee examined the existing cybersecurity
information sharing and response capabilities at DHS used to
fulfill these roles and evaluated the budget for the DHS Office
of Cybersecurity and Communications (CS&C) to determine whether
resources were being effectively utilized. The Subcommittee
emphasized reviewing the authorities and activities of the CS&C
National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center
(NCCIC), which includes DHS information sharing and incident
response units, in order to inform legislation currently in
draft form.
On May 16, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Facilitating Cyber Threat Information Sharing and Partnering
with the Private Sector to Protect Critical Infrastructure: An
Assessment of DHS Capabilities.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Ms. Roberta Stempfley, Acting Assistant
Secretary, Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Larry Zelvin, Director,
National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and Mr. Charles K.
Edwards, Acting Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security. The purpose of this hearing was to inform Members of
the cybersecurity authorities, capabilities and limitations at
DHS.
On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and
Communications held a joint classified Member tour and briefing
at the Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity
and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC). This briefing
provided Members an opportunity to assess the capabilities and
impediments of operations at the NCCIC in order to inform
authorizing legislation.

CYBER INCIDENT RESPONSE

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offers technical
assistance to owners and operators of critical infrastructure,
including State and local governments, on a voluntary basis in
the event of cyber incidents. The Subcommittee in concerned
about the adequacy and effectiveness of DHS's efforts,
including education and outreach efforts to State and local
emergency planners.
On October 30, 2013, the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the Subcommittee
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies held a joint hearing entitled ``Cyber Incident
Response: Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms.
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary,
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National Protection
and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Mr. Charley English, Director, Georgia Emergency Management
Agency, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency
Management Association; Mr. Craig Orgeron, Chief Information
Officer and Executive Director, Department of Information
Technology Services, State of Mississippi, testifying on behalf
of the National Association of State Chief Information
Officers; Mr. Mike Sena, Deputy Director, Northern California
Regional Intelligence Center, testifying on behalf of the
National Fusion Center Association; and Mr. Paul Molitor,
Assistant Vice President, National Electrical Manufacturers
Association. This hearing examined the extent of cyber threat
information sharing and response capabilities to a cyber
incident with physical consequences. The purpose of the hearing
was to examine ways to improve the ability of DHS to aid state
and local emergency responders in the event of a significant
cyber incident.
In preparation for this hearing, Committee staff met with
stakeholders to discuss information sharing related to cyber
threats and cyber incident response capabilities. On September
18, 2013, Committee staff also received a briefing from
representatives from DHS's Office of Cybersecurity and
Communications on the Department's efforts to share cyber
threat information with emergency response providers.

PRIVACY CONCERNS WITH OBAMACARE

The implementation of systems associated with the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare),
including healthcare.gov, the Federal Health Insurance Exchange
(HIX) and the Federal Data Services Hub, raised concerns that
these systems do not properly secure sensitive personal data.
On July 17, 2013, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's Subcommittee on
Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements held a joint
hearing entitled ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, and Fraud
Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing Apparatus.'' The
Subcommittees received testimony from Mr. Alan R. Duncan,
Assistant Inspector General for Security and Information
Technology Services, Inspector General for Tax Administration,
Department of the Treasury; Mr. Terence V. Milholland, Chief
Technology Officer, Internal Revenue Service; Hon. Danny
Werfel, Principal Deputy Commissioner, Internal Revenue
Service; Hon. Marilyn B. Tavenner, Administrator, Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services; Mr. Henry Chao, Deputy Chief Information
Officer, Deputy Director of the Office of Information Services,
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services; and Mr. John Dicken, Director,
Health Care, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
On September 11, 2013, the Subcommittee continued to
examine the issue of the security of personal information
through a hearing entitled ``The Threat to Americans' Personal
Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability of the
Health Exchange Data Hub.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr. Michael Astrue, Former Social Security Commissioner,
Former U.S. Department of Health and Human Services General
Counsel; Stephen T. Parente, Ph.D., Minnesota Insurance
Industry Chair of Health Finance, Director, Medical Industry
Leadership Institute and Professor, Department of Finance,
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota; Ms. Kay
Daly, Assistant Inspector General, Audit Services, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services; and Mr. Matt Salo,
Executive Director, National Association of Medicaid Directors.
In preparation for these hearings, Subcommittee staff met
with stakeholders to examine what measures were being taken by
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to protect
personal identifiable information and whether those measures
were adequate. Despite assures from CMS, the Subcommittee
continues to be concerned that adequate security measures and
certifications have yet to be implemented.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13636

Executive Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure
Cybersecurity, has directed the National Institutes for
Standards and Technology (NIST) to work with stakeholders to
develop a voluntary framework for reducing cyber risks to
critical infrastructure.
On July 18, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Oversight of Executive Order 13636 and Development of the
Cybersecurity Framework.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr. Robert Kolasky, Director, Implementation Task Force,
National Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department
of Homeland Security; Charles H. Romine, PhD, Director,
Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce; and Eric
A. Fischer, PhD, Senior Specialist, Science and Technology,
Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
From July 10 through 12, 2013, Committee staff attended the
third Cybersecurity Framework workshop in San Diego, California
hosted by the University of California, San Diego and the
National Health Information Sharing and Analysis Center (NH-
ISAC). At this workshop, NIST presented an annotated outline of
the initial draft Cybersecurity Framework for discussion.
From September 11 through 13, 2013, Committee staff
attended the fifth Cybersecurity Framework workshop in
Richardson, Texas hosted by the University of Texas at Dallas.
At this workshop, NIST presented the draft Preliminary
Cybersecurity Framework for discussion. The purpose of
attending the workshops was to participate in the development
of the framework and meet with other stakeholders to inform
continuing oversight of the development of the EO framework.
In preparation for the hearing and workshops, Subcommittee
Members and staff held a series of meetings with stakeholders
participating in the development of the framework.

CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STANDARDS

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the statutory
authority, which currently expires on January 15, 2014, to
regulate chemical facilities for security purposes. While the
Subcommittee supports reauthorizing Chemical Facility Anti-
Terrorism Standards (CFATS), a number of concerns exposed by
Congress and reports from both the DHS Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO)
must be addressed. Concerns include the adequacy and
effectiveness of DHS efforts including program management.
The explosion on April 17, 2013, at the West Fertilizer
Company fertilizer distribution facility in West, Texas, led to
additional focus on DHS's ability to identify noncompliant
facilities as the company had not reported to DHS under the
CFATS program even though it appeared to have possessed more
than threshold quantities of chemicals of interest. DHS had no
knowledge of the facility's existence.
On August 1, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: The Problem of Unidentified
Chemical Facilities.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr. David Wulf, ISCD Director, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen
L. Caldwell, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, U.S.
Government Accountability Office; Mr. Donnie Dippel, President,
Texas Ag Industries Association; Mr. Paul Derig, Environmental
Health and Safety Manger III, J.R. Simplot Company, testifying
on behalf of the Agricultural Retailers Association; Mr.
Timothy J. Scott, Chief Security Officer, Corporate Director,
Emergency Services and Security, The Dow Chemical Company; and
Mr. Sean Moulton, Director, Open Government Policy, Center for
Effective Government. The purpose of this hearing was to
examine DHS efforts to improve their ability to identify other
``outlier'' facilities not currently identified.
Subcommittee staff received two bicameral, multi-Committee
briefings from DHS, Infrastructure Security Compliance
Division. In addition, Subcommittee staff held a series of
meetings with stakeholders to inform efforts to draft
reauthorization legislation.

DOMINO

The DHS National Protection and Programs Directorate,
Network Security Deployment Branch is currently in the process
of developing an approximately $920 million Request for
Proposal (RFP) for the Development, Operations and Maintenance
(DOMino) Federal Enterprise Network Security Program. The
Subcommittee has concerns regarding the size, scope,
effectiveness and cost of the program. On August 6, 2013,
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of the
Department of Homeland Security on this acquisition to update
timeline for the release of the RFP.

CONTINUOUS DIAGNOSTIC AND MITIGATION (CDM) PROGRAM

The Subcommittee examined the progress of the Government-
wide adoption of the $6 billion the Continuous Diagnostic and
Mitigation Program, which will consolidate Federal
cybersecurity practices under one set of requirements. On
October 30, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Department of Homeland Security on the
CDM program to ascertain contract awards and timelines for
deployment.

DOMESTIC NUCLEAR DETECTION OFFICE

The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) has the
mandate to develop technologies to detect radiological threats
within the United States. On March 14, 2013, Members of the
Subcommittee received a briefing from representatives from the
DNDO to investigate the adequacy of the office's $200 million
and the effectiveness of technologies under development.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Cyber Threats from China, Russia and Iran: Protecting
American Critical Infrastructure.'' March 20, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-9)
``Striking the Right Balance: Protecting Our Nation's Critical
Infrastructure from Cyber Attack and Ensuring Privacy
and Civil Liberties.'' April 25, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
13)
``Facilitating Cyber Threat Information Sharing and Partnering
with the Private Sector to Protect Critical
Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS Capabilities.''
May 16, 2013. (Serial No. 113-17)
``Evaluating Privacy, Security, and Fraud Concerns with
ObamaCare's Information Sharing Apparatus.'' Joint
hearing with the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform, Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements. July 17, 2013. (Serial No. 113-25)
``Oversight of Executive Order 13636 and Development of the
Cybersecurity Framework.'' July 18, 213. (Serial No.
113-27)
``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid: The Problem of Unidentified
Chemical Facilities.'' August 1, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
30)
``The Threat to Americans' Personal Information: A Look into
the Security and Reliability of the Health Exchange
Data Hub.'' September 11, 2013. (Serial No. 113-33)
``Cyber Incident Response: Bridging the Gap Between
Cybersecurity and Emergency Management.''Joint hearing
with the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications. October 30, 2013. (Serial
No. 113-39)
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency held 10
hearings, receiving testimony from 40 witnesses.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

PRIVACY ISSUES

The protection of the privacy of American citizens is
critically important especially when implementing programs and
policies to secure the Nation. Specifically, ensuring that the
Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) information gathering
and analysis functions and other programs across its components
adhere to established standards is a critical responsibility of
DHS through its Chief Privacy Officer. On February 6, 2013,
Members of the Subcommittee received a classified briefing on
privacy issues and the role of the Department and the National
Counterterrorism Center in collecting, analyzing, and storing
intelligence on U.S. persons. The Members learned how the
Center is implementing its new ``Guidelines for Access,
Retention, Use, and Dissemination of U.S. Persons
Information.''
On June 19, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from
officials from the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
on civil liberties concerns at border checkpoints.

DHS SPENDING

The terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, forced the
United States to fundamentally rethink the threats it faces and
its approach to defending the Nation. Today, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) has a budget of almost $60 billion,
employs more than 225,000 people, operates in more than 75
countries, and is the third largest Federal agency. At a time
when the Nation stands at over $17 trillion in debt, a rigorous
assessment is needed to review how the Department spends
taxpayer dollars. On February 15, 2013, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How Wisely is
DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. James Gilmore, III, President Free Congress
Foundation; Mr. Shawn Reese, Analyst, Emergency Management and
Homeland Security Policy, Congressional Research Service,
Library of Congress; Mr. Rick ``Ozzie'' Nelson, Vice President
for Business Development, Cross Match Technologies; Ms.
Cathleen Berrick, Managing Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office. The purpose
of the hearing was to address the Department's progress and
shortcomings in implementing its various missions 10 years
after its creation, integrating its components, and diligence
in making sure taxpayer dollars are being spent efficiently.
In addition, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter on
February 28, 2013, to the Undersecretary for Management on the
Department's conference spending. The letter noted concerns
over DHS's conference spending and previous data provided to
the Committee. The Department provided a response on May 28,
2013. Additionally, on November 6, 2013, the Chair of the
Subcommittee requested the Comptroller General of the U.S.
review DHS's management of fee based programs.
In light of egregious waste related to Internal Revenue
Service training videos uncovered by the Inspector General of
the Department of the Treasury, the Chair of the Subcommittee
sent a letter on June 6, 2013, to the Undersecretary for
Management, requesting that the Department provide the cost and
types of internal training materials, especially videos,
created by DHS and its components. To date, the Department has
not provided a response.

TSA'S PASSENGER SCREENING TECHNOLOGIES

After the 2009 Christmas Day Northwest Flight 253 bombing
attempt, deployment of the Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT)
machines at airports Nation-wide accelerated, resulting in a
total of 841 such machines being deployed to 208 airports.
These machines were deployed to enhance TSA's capability to
identify non-metallic and liquid explosives, akin to the bomb
used in the Flight 253 bombing attempt. Due to privacy
concerns, in January 2012, Congress mandated in the FAA
Modernization Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95) that all advanced
imaging technology be equipped with Automated Target
Recognition. Because of this, all backscatter AIT units, which
were unable to meet the new mandate, were removed from airports
at the vendor's expense.
In an effort to review the TSA's Passenger Screening
Technologies, on February 5, 2013, the Members of the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security and the Subcommittee on
Oversight and Management Efficiency received a joint classified
briefing. The Subcommittees were briefed by representatives
from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General
(OIG). The briefing addressed the development of the
technology, challenges with the acquisition process, among
other issues. Subsequent to the briefing, the OIG released a
report on TSA's deployment and use of AIT machines [OIG-13-
120]. The OIG Report found that TSA did not develop a
comprehensive deployment strategy to ensure all AIT units were
effectively deployed and fully used for screening passengers
due to the agency failing to have a policy or process requiring
program offices to prepare strategic deployment plans for new
technology that align with the overall goals of its Passenger
Screening Program and lacking adequate internal controls to
ensure accurate data on Advanced Imaging Technology
utilization.
As a result of the briefing, the Chair of the Subcommittee
sent a letter to the Administrator of TSA. The TSA provided the
Subcommittee with a response on March 15, 2013. The
Subcommittee Chair also signed onto ongoing GAO work evaluating
TSA's AIT program. The Subcommittee intends to further review
and monitor TSA's Passenger Screening Technologies in
conjunction with the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.

DHS HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION AT ST. ELIZABETHS

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stands as the
third largest department in the Federal Government, with its
components scattered at over 50 locations throughout the
National Capital Region. In an effort to consolidate locations
and increase a unified organization, construction is currently
underway for a new headquarters facility. The construction of
the Department's Headquarters at the St. Elizabeths campus, in
Washington, D.C. is the largest Federal construction project to
occur in the National Capital Region since the construction of
The Pentagon. To date, over $1 billion has been appropriated
for this project.
On March 1, 2013, officials from the Department briefed
Committee staff on construction efforts at the St. Elizabeths
facility and discussed budget requests. On March 15, 2013, the
Members of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit to the
Department of Homeland Security Consolidated Headquarters at
St. Elizabeths. While on campus, Members toured the facility
and were briefed by the Department on construction progress and
the status of consolidation efforts. As a follow up to this
site visit, on March 20, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee
requested the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a
comprehensive review of the consolidation project. GAO
acknowledged receipt of this request. On May 30, 2013,
Committee staff were briefed by officials from the General
Services Administration (GSA) on the St. Elizabeths
consolidated headquarters effort. Committee staff received
separate briefings related to GSA contracts awarded for this
project. On July 29, 2013, Committee staff attended the ribbon
cutting ceremony on the St. Elizabeth's campus for the United
States Coast Guard Headquarters. The Subcommittee will continue
to closely monitor this major project.

UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE

The Subcommittee examined the homeland security operations
of the United States Secret Service (USSS), including its
critical role of protecting the President of the United States,
particularly during the Presidential inauguration, and other
duties. The Committee is also monitoring the upgrading and
modernizing of USSS information technology (IT) capabilities,
and issues related to employee integrity and morale. On January
18, 2013, the Committee staff traveled to the U.S. Secret
Service, James J. Rowley Training Center in Beltsville,
Maryland to receive a briefing on preparations for the 2013
Presidential inauguration. Committee Staff visited the Multi-
Agency Communications Center and received a briefing on the
planning and logistical details of the inauguration from
cognizant Secret Service officials.
On April 17, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee received a
briefing with the Secret Service Director to discuss: The
Director's goals and priorities; budget issues; the Cartagena,
Columbia, employee misconduct investigation; among other
topics.
Committee staff received a briefing from Secret Service
officials on June 27, 2013 on the agency's information
technology modernization efforts. On August 8, 2013, Committee
staff also received a briefing on the next generation
Presidential limousine program and conducted a site visit at
the Secret Service mail screening facility in Washington D.C.
On November 12, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee conducted
a site visit to the Secret Service training facility in
Beltsville, Maryland. Members toured the facility and were
briefed by Secret Service officials on their training programs.

DHS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The Subcommittee reviewed the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) overall efforts to address information
technology (IT) challenges, including the management and
integration of the Department's IT systems. The Committee
reviewed the authorities and activities of the Chief
Information Officer (CIO) to ensure the effective management
and coordination of key IT systems planning, investment
management, cloud computing, data consolidating, operations,
policy development, and related personnel management. The
Subcommittee also examined component CIOs--particularly Customs
and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE), and United States Customs and Immigration
Services (USCIS)--and their efforts to modernize and implement
critical IT systems supporting our border agents and
immigration officers. On February 21, 2013, Committee staff
received a briefing from DHS Office of Inspector General
concerning their ongoing IT Audits and IT management issues.
From March 13 through 15, 2013, in preparation for the March
19, 2013 hearing, Committee staff received briefings from
representatives from DHS, including: The DHS Chief Information
Officer; USCIS, including the USCIS Chief Information Officer;
CBP; and ICE, including the ICE Chief Information Officer. On
August 22, 2013, Committee staff were briefed by the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on its
transportation infrastructure modernization efforts, which
seeks to update TSA IT infrastructure in maritime, surface, and
aviation environments.
On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS Harnessed
IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration Laws?'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. Margaret H. Graves,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. David Powner, Director, Information Technology
Management Issues, Government Accountability Office; and Mr.
Charles K. Edwards, Deputy Inspector General, Department of
Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was to assess how
IT resources are being effectively utilized to help secure our
borders and uphold immigration laws and how the Department is
exercising proper management and oversight of its IT
investments.
As a follow up to this hearing, the Chair and Ranking
Member of the Subcommittee requested on March 21, 2013, that
the Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine the
Department's tactical communication acquisition programs. The
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee additionally
requested on May 23, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing GAO review
of the TECS modernization program--the Treasury Enforcement
Communication System. Committee staff also received a briefing
from the Office of Inspector General regarding its
investigation related to the DHS Chief Information Officer.

DHS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

The Subcommittee conducted oversight of the Department of
Homeland Security's (DHS) progress to properly manage financial
systems and data to minimize inefficient and wasteful spending,
make more informed decisions to manage its programs and
implement Department policies. The Subcommittee also reviewed
the Department's efforts to enhance its managerial cost
accounting, address internal control weaknesses in financial
reporting, achieve a clean audit opinion on its financial
statements, and reduce the reliance on manual data calls to
collect cost information from the various components and
compile consolidated, reliable data. In light of the Government
Accountability Office's (GAO) 2013 High-Risk report which
identified financial management within the Department as high
risk, on February 20, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee
and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency,
and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies, sent a letter to DHS's
Chief Financial Officer regarding the Department's financial
management systems and efforts to obtain a clean audit opinion
on its financial statements. The Department provided a response
to this letter on March 8, 2013. On March 11, 2013, Committee
staff received a briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer.
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller
General on June 6, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing review of DHS
financial management efforts being performed at the request of
the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Committee. GAO issued its report DHS Financial Management:
Additional Efforts Needed to Resolve Deficiencies in Internal
Controls and Financial Management Systems on September 30,
2013, [GAO-13-561]. The report contained four recommendations
for executive action. On July 8, 2013, Committee staff received
a briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer regarding DHS's
efforts to modernize its financial systems.
To further examine these issues, on November 15, 2013, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``DHS Financial
Management: Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer
Dollars.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Asif
Khan, Director, Financial Management and Assurance, U.S.
Government Accountability Office; and Ms. Anne Richards,
Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of Inspector
General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of
the hearing was to examine relevant GAO and Inspector General
findings on DHS financial practices, including steps to obtain
a clean audit opinion and implement financial management
systems.

FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE

The Subcommittee is concerned with, and is monitoring, the
safety and security of Federal buildings and facilities,
including: The lead role and effectiveness of the Federal
Protective Service (FPS); its implementation of a risk-
assessment Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool; its
collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate; its use of and
documenting of qualifications for contracting officers; and
other issues related to its best practices in management and
conducting effective risk assessment reviews. As part of
ongoing FPS oversight, the Committee requested that the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine the sources that
inform how Federal agencies conduct their physical security
programs, and the management practices that agencies use to
oversee physical security activities and allocation physical
security resources. In response to this request, on January 24,
2013, GAO issued its report entitled Facility Security: Greater
Outreach by DHS on Standards and Management Practices Could
Benefit Federal Agencies [GAO-13-122]. The report contained two
recommendation. The GAO also released a supplement to the
report [GAO-13-22SP], which presented the results of GAO's web-
based survey of Executive Branch agencies about how they
approach the physical security of facilities that FPS is not
responsible for protecting. The Chair of the Subcommittee
signed onto ongoing work by the Government Accountability
Office (GAO) examining FPS contract guard management, Federal
facility risk assessment process, and Federal facility
evacuation preparedness. The GAO issued its report on FPS
contract guard management on September 17, 2013, Federal
Protective Service Challenges with Oversight of Contract Guard
Program Still Exist, and Additional Management Controls are
Needed, [GAO-13-694]. The report contained three
recommendations for executive action. The GAO issued its report
on Federal facility evacuation preparedness on October 25,
2013, Federal Facilities: Selected Facilities Emergency Plans
Generally Reflect Federal Guidance, [GAO-14-101].
On February 13, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from the GAO concerning their ongoing work related to the FPS.
On March 4, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from the
Federal Protective Services Union. On March 20, 2013,
Subcommittee Majority Staff received a briefing from FPS, DHS
Deputy Director for Policy and Planning, and Deputy Director
for Operations at the Federal Protective Service. On April 4,
2013, Committee staff visited FPS headquarters to receive a
briefing on FPS's risk assessment process and toured security
operations at a local federal Facility. On May 23, 2013, the
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight
and Management Efficiency, and the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies Subcommittee, requested the GAO to review physical
and information security efforts at Federal facilities. On June
12, 2013, Chairs and Ranking Members of the Full Committee and
the Subcommittee, requested the Comptroller General of the
United States review the coordination and sharing of Federal
facility security and threat information. On July 18, 2013,
Committee staff visited FPS operations at its C St. Facility in
Washington D.C. to learn more about how FPS protects Federal
buildings. Committee staff received a separate briefing from
FPS officials related to its activities based cost modeling
efforts.
In light of the tragic shooting at the Washington Naval
Yard on September 16, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing on
October 30, 2013, entitled ``Facility Protection: Implications
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. L. Eric Patterson,
Director, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Mr. Greg Marshall, Chief Security Officer,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Caitlin Durkovich,
Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Protection, U.S. Department
of Homeland Security, testifying on behalf of the Interagency
Security Committee; and Mr. Mark Goldstein, Director, Physical
Infrastructure Issues, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
The purpose of the hearing was to examine the state of physical
security at Federal facilities and identify opportunities to
prevent similar tragedies in the future.

SEQUESTRATION

In March 2013, sequestration took effect resulting in a
series of automatic, across the board spending cuts. The
Department provided conflicting public statements on the
impacts of these cuts. Initial plans to furlough Department
employees were later avoided yet public statements from the
Department on compromised border security and impassible
airport screening lines caused undue alarm among the American
people. As a result of these concerns, on April 12, 2013, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``The Impact of
Sequestration on Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible
Threat?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael
Borras, Under Secretary for Management, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Mr. Thomas S. Winkowski, Deputy
Commissioner, Performing the duties of the Commissioner,
Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. John Halinski, Deputy Administrator,
Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Mr. Daniel H. Ragsdale, Deputy Director,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; and Mr. Brandon Judd, President, National
Border Patrol Council. The purpose of this hearing was to
examine the Department's preparations for sequestration and its
conclusions on the possible impacts to homeland security.

DUPLICATION AND WASTEFUL SPENDING

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the
Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
have issued numerous reports identifying duplication and waste
within DHS. Private sector best management practices also offer
opportunities for DHS to improve operations. With the National
debt at about $17 trillion, rigorous oversight to identify and
eliminate duplicative and wasteful programs is essential. As a
result, on April 26, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Cutting DHS Duplication and Wasteful Spending:
Implementing Private Sector Best Practices and Watchdog
Recommendations.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms.
Cathleen Berrick, Managing Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office; Ms. Anne L.
Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of
Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Paul
G. Stern, Ph.D., Board Director, Business Executives for
National Security; Mr. Craig Killough, Vice President,
Organization Markets, Project Management Institute; and Henry
H. Willis, Ph.D., Director, RAND Homeland Security and Defense
Center. The purpose of this hearing was to assess the findings
of the GAO and the Inspector General related to duplication and
waste within the Department and examine best practices
identified by the private sector to improve DHS's efficiency
and effectiveness. As a follow up to this hearing, the Chair of
the Subcommittee sent a letter on May 17, 2013, to the
Secretary of Homeland Security summarizing the hearing's
findings and requesting additional information on steps the
Department has taken to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of its programs. The Department provided a
response on December 15, 2013.
Committee staff also received a briefing on March 26, 2013,
from Department officials on DHS's ``See Something, Say
Something'' campaign to examine the campaign's effectiveness
and ensure taxpayer dollars are spent wisely.
On September 23, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from GAO officials on the Department's progress in addressing
GAO's High-Risk List area of ``Strengthening Department of
Homeland Security Management Functions.'' The area includes
issues related to DHS acquisition management, financial
management, information technology management, human capital
management, and management integration. The GAO's High-Risk
List includes areas at high risk due to vulnerabilities to
fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. The GAO has included
DHS management functions in its Hight-Risk List since 2003.

DHS WORKFORCE MORALE

Rigorous oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's
(DHS) efforts to improve workforce morale has been conducted
since the Department continues to perform poorly in the Office
of Personnel Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the
Department's own personnel surveys. As a result, the Chair of
the Subcommittee signed onto ongoing Government Accountability
Office (GAO) work assessing the Department's recruitment and
hiring strategies. The GAO issued its report on September 17,
2013, DHS Recruiting and Hiring: DHS Is Generally Filling
Mission-Critical Positions, but Could Better Track Costs of
Coordinated Recruiting Efforts, [GAO-13-742]. The report
included one recommendation for executive action. On May 7,
2013, Committee staff were briefed by the Chief Human Capital
Officer on the Employee Engagement Executive Steering Committee
and Department leadership training to address the morale issues
at the Department.
On September 11, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from officials of the Institute of Medicine of the National
Academies. On September 12, 2013, the Institute of Medicine
released a report titled A Ready and Resilient Workforce for
the Department of Homeland Security: Protecting America's Front
Line. The report contained seven recommendations to improve the
readiness and resilience (the ability to withstand, recover,
and grow in the face of stressors and changing demands) of DHS.

EMPLOYEE INTEGRITY

Strong employee integrity within the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is essential to homeland security. Although the
vast majority of Department employees reflect the Department's
core values, even one corrupt employee represents a management
challenge. As a result, the Chair of the Subcommittee signed on
to GAO work evaluating employee misconduct issues at the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA). On July 30, 2013,
GAO issued its report entitled ``Transportation Security: TSA
Could Strengthen Monitoring of Allegations of Employee
Misconduct'' [GAO-13-624]. The report contained four
recommendations for executive action.
To examine these findings, the Subcommittee on Oversight
and Management Efficiency and the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security held a joint hearing on July 31, 2013,
entitled ``TSA Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by
Airport Security Personnel.'' The Subcommittees received
testimony from Mr. John Halinski, Deputy Administrator,
Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen M. Lord, Director, Forensic
Audits and Investigative Services, Government Accountability
Office; and Ms. Deborah Outten-Mills, Acting Assistant
Inspector General for Inspections, Office of Inspector General,
U.S. Department of Homeland. The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the scope of misconduct within TSA and determine to
what extent the Administration is taking action to address
employee integrity issues. On August 19, 2013, the Chair of the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security requesting an update on the Department's mandated
report on investigating corruption in DHS. The Department
provided a response on December 5, 2013.

FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OVERSIGHT

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the largest
law enforcement agency in the Federal Government. According to
the 2008 Census of Federal Law Enforcement Officers, DHS had
more than 45 percent of all Federal law enforcement officers
with arrest and firearms authority--with the number of officers
totaling approximately 60,000. On May 23, 2013, Member of the
Subcommittee conducted a site visit to the Federal Law
Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Cheltenham, Maryland.
The site visit provided Members the opportunity to tour the
facility and receive briefings on FLETC operations. As a follow
up to this visit, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter
to the Director of FLETC on June 14, 2013, related to FLETC
training, the letter specifically requested information on the
types of training FLETC provided to agencies outside DHS. FLETC
provided a response to the Subcommittee on July 22, 2013. In
addition, the Chair of the Subcommittee met with the Director
of FLETC on June 19, 2013, to obtain an overview of FLETC's
operations. On July 26, 2013, Committee staff received a
briefing from FLETC officials regarding training provided to
the Department of State.
In response to concerns regarding the Federal Flight Deck
Officer program, the Chairs of the Subcommittee on Oversight
and Management Efficiency and the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security, sent a letter to the Secretary of
Homeland Security on June 6, 2013, requesting obtain
information on the future of the program, including to what
extent the Department plans to use FLETC to continue this
essential training for pilots. A response was provided to the
Subcommittees on July 29, 2013.
Media reports of ammunition and weapons acquisitions by DHS
spurred public interest and led to wide-ranging questions
regarding the amounts of ammunition purchased by the
Department. As a result, the Chairs of the Full Committee and
the Subcommittee requested GAO to examine the Department's
ammunition and weapons procurements.

DHS COMMUNICATIONS

Effective communication is critical to implementing the
Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) mission of defending
the Nation. However, numerous recent incidents indicated the
Department was unresponsive to certain concerns from the
American people. A sound communication strategy is important to
help DHS's credibility, implement policy, respond to natural
disasters, and protect the homeland. On June 14, 2013, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Why Can't DHS Better
Communicate with the American People?'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr. Robert Jensen, Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary, Office of Public AffairsU.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Ms. Tamara Kessler, Acting Officer for Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. Bill Braniff, Executive Director, National
Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to
Terrorism, University of Maryland; and Mr. Doug Pinkham,
President, Public Affairs Council. The purpose of this hearing
was to assess the Department's strategy for communicating on
issues of importance and concern to the general public and key
stakeholders.
With continued concerns over the Department's transparency
with the American people, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to DHS's Acting Chief Privacy Officer on June 13, 2013,
requesting information on how the Department manages requests
submitted under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The
Department provided a response on July 22, 2013. Due to the
importance of this issue, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Comptroller General of the United States on
August 6, 2013, requesting a comprehensive review of DHS's
management of FOIA.
On June 21, 2013, Committee staff were briefed by Assistant
Secretary for the Office of Policy for Strategy, Planning,
Analysis, and Risk regarding the Department's strategic
planning efforts as part of the Quadrennial Homeland Security
Review. Officials from the Department responded to questions
regarding to what extent the Department is seeking input from
the public, industry, and other groups regarding the strategy,
among other things. As a follow up, on November 15, 2013, the
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittees sent a
letter to the Acting Secretary to ensure the review addresses
critical homeland security issues and relevant recommendations.

IRAN IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

The Intelligence Community and the Department of Defense
has previously raised significant concerns regarding the
Islamic Republic of Iran's presence in Latin America and the
threat this presence poses to National security. A June 2013
State Department report responding to the Countering Iran in
the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-220) conflicted
these findings by stating that the Iranian presence in the
hemisphere is ``waning.'' To examine these important issues, on
July 9, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Threat
to the Homeland: Iran's Extending Influence in the Western
Hemisphere.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Ilan
Berman, Vice President, American Foreign Policy Council; Mr.
Joseph M. Humire, Executive Director, Center for a Secure Free
Society; Mr. Blaise Misztal, Acting Director of Foreign Policy,
Bipartisan Policy Center; Mr. Douglas Farah, President, IBI
Consultants. The purpose of the hearing was to examine these
findings and assess the threat to U.S. homeland security from
Iran's presence in the Western Hemisphere.
Additionally, the Chair of Full Committee and the Chair of
the Subcommittee requested the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) examine the extent to which the Department of Homeland
Security conducts covert testing to determine weaknesses in
border security. In February 2013, the Chair of the
Subcommittee sent a letter to GAO to sign onto on-going work
being conducted for the Chair of the Full Committee related to
Iran's presence in Latin America and DHS's international
counterterrorism activities. The GAO issued its report on DHS's
international counterterrorism activities on September 25,
2013, Combating Terrorism: DHS Should Take Action to Better
Ensure Resources Abroad Align with Priorities, [GAO-13-681]. It
contained three recommendations for executive action.

DHS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) invests
extensively in major acquisition programs to develop new
systems that help the Department execute its many critical
missions. The Department is acquiring systems to help secure
the border, facilitate trade, screen travelers, enhance cyber
security, and improve disaster response, among other things.
Oversight and accountability of these important acquisition
programs is critical to ensure taxpayer dollars are not wasted.
In February 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee requested to
sign onto on-going Government Accountability (GAO) work related
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) acquisition of
border surveillance technology and DHS's multiyear acquisition
planning process. On March 21, 2013, the Chair and Ranking
Member of the Subcommittee requested GAO conduct a review of
the tactical communication acquisition programs underway in
DHS.
The Assistant Commissioner for Customs and Border
Protection briefed Committee staff on July 15, 2013, on the
status of several acquisition programs related to border
security. On August 1, 2013, the Undersecretary for Management,
the Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Information Officer, and
other senior officials briefed Committee staff on the status of
the Department's acquisition management efforts. As a follow
up, on November 5, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and
the Subcommittee raised concerns, in a letter to the Chief
Procurement Officer, over the Department's Enterprise
Acquisition Gateway for Leading Edge Solutions II (EAGLE II)
and requested additional information. The Department provided a
written response on December 2, 2013.
To more closely examine challenges related to DHS
acquisition management, on September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee
held a hearing entitled ``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving
Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons
Learned.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael
Borras, Undersecretary for Management, Department of Homeland
Security; Ms. Michele Mackin, Director, GAO; Ms. Anne Richards,
Assistant Inspector General for Audits, DHS Office of Inspector
General; Mr. William C. Greenwalt, Visiting Fellow, American
Enterprise Institute; Mr. Stan Soloway, President and CEO,
Professional Services Council; Mr. David Berteau, Senior Vice
President, Center for Strategic and International Studies. The
purpose of the hearing was to examine DHS's acquisition
practices to determine if the Department is effectively
implementing its policies and to assess whether DHS could
leverage best practices and lessons learned from the Defense
Department and the private sector.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How Wisely is DHS Spending
Taxpayer Dollars?'' February 15, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
2)
``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS Harnessed
IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration Laws?''
March 19, 2013. (Serial No. 113-7)
``The Impact of Sequestration on Homeland Security: Scare
Tactics or Possible Threat?'' April 12, 2013. (Serial
No. 113-10)
``Cutting DHS Duplication and Wasteful Spending: Implementing
Private Sector Best Practices and Watchdog
Recommendations.'' April 26, 2013. (Serial No. 113-14)
``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate with the American People?''
June 14, 2013. (Serial No. 113-22)
``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's Extending Influence in the
Western Hemisphere.'' July 9, 2013. (Serial No. 113-22)
``TSA Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by Airport
Security Personnel.'' Joint hearing with the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security. July 31, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-29)
``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers
Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons Learned.''''
September 19, 2013. (Serial No. 113-3)
``Facility Protection: Implications of the Navy Yard Shooting
on Homeland Security.'' October 30, 2013. (Serial No.
113-40)
``DHS Financial Management: Investigating DHS's Stewardship of
Taxpayer Dollars.'' November 15, 2013. (Serial No. 113-
44)
Subcommittee on Transportation Security

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security held six hearings,
receiving testimony from 18 witnesses, and considered two
measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

HELPING HEROES FLY ACT

Pub. Law 113-27, H.R. 1344 (S. 1367, S. 1403)

Summary

This law directs the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) to develop and implement a process to ease travel and, to
the extent possible, provide expedited passenger screening
services for severely injured or disabled Armed Forces members
and veterans, and their accompanying family members or non-
medical attendants. The TSA is required to maintain an
operations center to provide for the movement of such members
and veterans through screening before boarding a domestic or
foreign passenger aircraft. Additionally, the law requires TSA
to establish and publish certain protocols to contact the
operations center to request expedited screening services for
the service member or veteran. Furthermore, the TSA is directed
to annually report to Congress on the implementation of the
program. The TSA retains its flexibility to require additional
screening of any individual if intelligence or law enforcement
information indicates that additional screening is necessary.
As of March 2013, TSA began implementing the policies
codified in this law at security screening checkpoints. This
law seeks to facilitat the screening of our Nation's wounded
warriors' through airports and free up TSA screeners to focus
on real threats to our aviation systems. The Committee has long
advocated for less onerous airport screening for our men and
women in uniform. In fact, this bill builds upon past
legislation promoted by the Committee, including the Risk-Based
Security Screening for Members of the Armed Forces Act (Pub. L.
112-86), which requires TSA to provide expedited screening to
active duty military traveling on official orders.

Legislative History

H.R. 1344 was introduced in the House on March 21, 2013, by
Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Joyce, and Mr. Richmond, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 1344
was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The House considered H.R. 1344 on May 21, 2013, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by a \2/3\
recorded vote of 413 yeas with none voting ``nay'', (Roll No.
166)/
H.R. 1344 was received in the Senate on May 22, 2013, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
On August 1, 2013, the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation was discharged from further
consideration of H.R. 1344 by unanimous consent. The Senate
then passed H.R. 1344, with an amendment, by unanimous consent.
The House concurred in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1344,
on August 2, 2013, by unanimous consent.
H.R. 1344 was presented to the President on August 6, 2013,
and signed into law on August 9, 2013, as Public Law 113-27.

S. 1367, a Senate companion measure, was introduced in the
Senate on July 25, 2013, by Mr. Pryor and Ms. Ayotte; and
referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation.

TSA LOOSE CHANGE ACT

H.R. 1095

Summary

H.R. 1095 directs the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) to transfer unclaimed monies recovered at
airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations
providing places of rest and recuperation at airports for
members of the Armed Forces and their families, and establishes
a request for proposals (RFP) process to select such
organizations.
Section 44945 of title 49, U.S.C., enacted as part of
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub.
L. 108-334), authorized and directed unclaimed money collected
at airport security checkpoints to be used for civil aviation
security. According to the report ``FY 2012 Unclaimed Money at
Airports,'' which was prepared by TSA, from FY 2009 through FY
2012, TSA has collected an average of $465,285 from airport
security checkpoints annually. Just in FY 2012 alone, TSA
collected $531,395. However as of March 1, 2013, TSA only
expended $6,539 for the purpose of civil aviation security.
The Explanatory Statement contained in the Conference
Report (H. Rpt. 112-492) that accompanied the Consolidated and
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, (Pub. L. 113-6),
required TSA to issue a report on the feasibility of
transferring the unclaimed money recovered at airport
checkpoints to non-profit organizations that are selected on a
competitive basis. According to the report, it would cost the
Federal Government approximately $201,000 for the first year
alone if TSA was to transfer the money to a nonprofit
organization selected on a competitive basis. Further, the
report concluded that to minimize administrative overhead, TSA
would prefer to award the use of funding to one nonprofit
organization. After reviewing TSA's report, the Committee
believes that in order to ensure fairness of opportunity while
minimizing administrative overhead, TSA should transfer the
funds after a RFP is issued. Currently, United Services
Organizations (USO) is the sole non-profit operating airport
lounges for military service members and their families.
However, any non-profit organization that provides these kinds
of services can submit a proposal to TSA to seek these
unclaimed funds.

Legislative History

112th Congress
H.R. 2179 was introduced in the House on June 14, 2011, by
Mr. Miller of Florida and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2179 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
On March 7, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security considered H.R. 2179 and reported the measure to the
Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, without
amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 2179 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 2179 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-468.

AVIATION SECURITY STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2013

H.R. 1204

Summary

H.R. 1204 authorizes the Aviation Security Advisory
Committee (ASAC) and requires Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) to consult with the ASAC on aviation
security matters, including on the development and
implementation of policies, programs, rulemakings and security
directives. Additionally, the bill requires the ASAC to submit
recommendations to TSA.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) established the
ASAC in 1989 following the bombing of Pan American World
Airways Flight 103. Upon the establishment of TSA, sponsorship
of the ASAC was transferred to TSA. However, despite strong
support from aviation security stakeholders who participated in
the ASAC, TSA has allowed the ASAC's charter to expire. On July
7, 2011, TSA published an announcement in the Federal Register
to re-establish the ASAC, providing a setting for the aviation
industry to formally communicate with TSA and on October 27,
2011, the Secretary of Homeland Security appointed 24 new
members to the ASAC. On June 11, 2013, TSA published a notice
of charter renewal in the Federal Register to announce the
renewal of the ASAC. This legislation not only codifies current
Department and TSA policy but also ensures that the ASAC
remains intact.
In these dire budgetary times, it is imperative that TSA
interact with industry stakeholders for input on security
procedures and technology to ensure that the Administration is
spending its limited resources on initiatives that will enhance
aviation security for the traveling public.

Legislative History

112th Congress
H.R.1447 was introduced in the House on April 8, 2011, by
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi and Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.1447 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security.
On September 21, 2011, the Chair discharged the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security from further
consideration of H.R.1447. The Committee proceeded to the
consideration of H.R.1447 and ordered the measure to be
reported to the House, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1447 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-269.
The House considered H.R.1447 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012
by voice vote.
H.R.1447 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

S. 1804, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in
the Senate on December 11, 2013.

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ACQUISITION REFORM ACT

H.R. 2719

To require the Transportation Security Administration to
implement best practices and improve transparency with regard
to technology acquisition programs, and for other purposes.

Summary

H.R. 2719 was developed with valuable input from
stakeholders across the Federal Government and industry. The
bill introduces greater transparency and accountability for the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) spending decisions
through a series of commonsense reforms. Specifically, it
requires TSA to develop and share with the public, for the
first time: A strategic, multiyear technology investment plan;
share key information with Congress on technology acquisitions,
including cost overruns, delays, or technical failures within
30 days of identifying the problem; establish principles for
managing equipment in inventory to eliminate expensive storage
of unusable or outdated technologies; and report on its goals
for contracting with small businesses.
H.R. 2719 requires TSA to do a better job of not only
managing its own resources, but also leveraging resources
outside of the Department of Homeland Security.

Legislative History

H.R. 2719 was introduced in the House on July 18, 2013, by
Mr. Hudson, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Richmond, and Mr. Thompson of
Mississippi, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 2719 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee considered H.R. 2719 on July 24, 2013, and
forwarded H.R. 2719 to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R. 2719 on October 29,
2013, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with
a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R. 2719 to the House on November
21, 2013, as H. Rpt. 113-275.
The House considered H.R. 2719 under Suspension of the
Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ record vote of 416
yeas and 0 nays (Roll Call Vote No. 616).
H.R. 2719 was received in the Senate on December 9, 2013,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

TSA'S PASSENGER SCREENING TECHNOLOGIES

On February 5, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security and the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Management Efficiency received a joint classified briefing on
the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) Passenger
Screening Technologies. The Subcommittees were briefed by
representatives from the Government Accountability Office and
the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector
General.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security continued to
examine this issue with a second classified Member briefing on
March 18, 2013. Representatives from TSA were present to
respond to Member questions.

TSA'S RISK-BASED SECURITY INITIATIVES

Since 2011, the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) has launched a series of risk-based security (RBS)
initiatives aimed at improving passenger experience and
security, including but not limited to Pre-Check, an expedited
screening program for certain domestic travelers. In addition,
TSA has applied a risk-based strategy to achieve the 100
percent screening of international inbound cargo on passenger
aircraft, and continues to work with the air cargo industry on
implementing RBS initiatives. Unfortunately, to date, TSA has
not made similar efforts to streamline and reform its surface
transportation programs, such as the Visible Intermodal
Prevention and Response (VIPR) Program or develop a method by
which the agency can display the value or cost-effectiveness of
the programs.
On March 14, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based Security.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John S. Pistole,
Administrator, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was
to provide an opportunity for the TSA Administrator to discuss
efforts of applying a risk-based approach to TSA's aviation and
surface transportation programs and ongoing efforts to make TSA
more effective and efficient.
The Subcommittee continued its oversight with a hearing on
April 11, 2013, entitled ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based
Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. Ken Dunlap, Global Director, Security &
Travel Facilitation, International Air Transport Association;
Ms. Sharon L. Pinkerton, Senior Vice President, Legislative and
Regulatory Policy, Airlines for America; Mr. Geoff Freeman,
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President, U.S.
Travel Association; Mr. Michael C. Mullen, Executive Director,
Express Association of America; Mr. Christopher U. Browne,
Airport Manager, Washington Dulles International Airport,
testifying on behalf of the American Association of Airport
Executives; and Mr. David A. Borer, General Counsel, American
Federation of Government Employees. This hearing was the second
in a two-part series focused on TSA's RBS initiatives. This
hearing provided an opportunity to hear from industry
stakeholders on their perspectives of the initiatives. In
addition, on April 9, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent
a letter to the President of the Association of Professional
Flight Attendants, regarding the association's concerns on
TSA's changes to the Prohibited Items List.
The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on June 19, 2013,
on TSA's PreCheck Program.

TSA PROCUREMENT REFORM

Technology procurement missteps have a large quantifiable
cost to taxpayers. The Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) must take immediate steps to address its technology
procurement challenges and implement necessary reforms in order
to eliminate the wasteful technology expenditures that do not
make Americans safer.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on May 8, 2013, entitled
``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving Taxpayer Dollars Through
Smarter Spending Practices.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Ms. Karen Shelton Waters, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Acquisition, Transportation Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Paul
Benda, Director, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Science &
Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Mr. Stephen M. Lord, Director, Forensic Audits and
Investigative Services, U.S. Government Accountability Office;
and Mr. Charles K. Edwards, Deputy Inspector General, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of this hearing
was to address how TSA can improve and streamline its internal
processes for procurement and increase small business
participation while engaging the private sector in the research
and development of new security technologies.
The TSA expends significant funds each year on developing,
purchasing, and maintaining screening technology. For example,
in FY 2012, TSA spent more than $550 million for explosives
detection screening technology, about two-thirds of which was
for equipment procurements, and the rest for maintenance. The
TSA is by far the largest purchaser of detection equipment in
the Department of Homeland Security, with approximately $3
billion in inventories, deployed across all major U.S. airports
and multiple storage locations. The Government Accountability
Office and the Department of Homeland Security Office of
Inspector General have found, through numerous studies, that
TSA is not effectively implementing government best practices
and DHS policy for acquiring new security capabilities. This
has resulted in acquisitions that have failed to meet security
performance objectives and have wasted taxpayers dollars.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 17, 2013, entitled
``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA Acquisition Reform.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Marc Pearl, President
& CEO, Homeland Security & Defense Business Council; Ms. Shene
Commodore, Government Contracts & Business Manager, Intertek,
testifying on behalf of the Security Industry Association; and
Mr. Dolan P. Falconer, Jr., Co-Founder, Chairman & General
Manger, Scan Tech Holdings. The focus of this hearing was to
obtain industry perspective on how TSA can improve and
streamline its internal processes for technology acquisition.

PASSENGER EXIT LANES

During the first week of June 2013, each affected airport
received a proposed amendment to its Airport Security Program
(ASP) shifting access control responsibilities to the airport
operators at an estimated taxpayer savings of $100 million
annually, according to the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA). Following delivery of the proposed
amendment, each airport operator was provided a 45-day Notice
and Comment period to share its thoughts and concerns on how
the amendment affects its particular operations. The TSA
reviewed comments from each airport and responded to individual
concerns. After the review, TSA changed the language before
issuing the amendments to clarify some matters in response to
the comments. In accordance with TSA rules, some airports
submitted petitions asking that TSA reconsider the amendments.
Under its current plan, TSA will provide a one month extension
to February 1, 2014, to certain airports, while others will be
notified to staff their exit lanes beginning January 1, 2014.
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 (H.J. Res. 59)
which passed the House on December 12, 2013, and the Senate on
December 19, 2012, contains a provision requiring TSA to
continue monitoring passenger exit points from the sterile area
of airports which the agency provided such monitoring as of
December 1, 2013. H.J. Res. 59 has been presented to the
President and is awaiting signature.
The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on June 27, 2013,
on TSA's plans to transfer the responsibility of monitoring
passenger exit lanes to local airport operators.
Representatives from TSA were present to respond to Member
questions.
The Department of Homeland Security's Fiscal Year 2014
budget request included a proposal to shift the responsibility
for exit lane monitoring from TSA to the Airport Operators at
certain locations.
The TSA decided to transfer the responsibility through an
amendment to the airport's Airport Security Program rather than
through the formal rulemaking process. On October 18, 2013, the
Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a letter to
the Administrator of TSA regarding the process the
Administration chose to follow to implement the transition. The
TSA provided a response on November 4, 2013.

TSA PERSONNEL MISCONDUCT

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is one of
the most publicly visible components of the Department of
Homeland Security. With TSA assuming a front-line, high-profile
position in the fight against terrorism, the agency is often in
the spotlight when allegations of misconduct arise.
The Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency and
the Subcommittee on Transportation Security held a joint
hearing on July 31, 2013, entitled ``TSA Integrity Challenges:
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.'' The
Subcommittees received testimony from Mr. John Halinski, Deputy
Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen M. Lord, Director,
Forensic Audits and Investigative Services, Government
Accountability Office; and Ms. Deborah Outten-Mills, Acting
Assistant Inspector General for Inspections, Office of
Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The
purpose of this hearing was to examine how TSA handles
allegations of misconduct among its employees including its
investigation and adjudication process and to discuss the
hiring practices, policies and training it has in place to
deter criminal or negligent behavior.

DHS RESEARCH LABORATORIES

On November 6, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee conducted
a site visit to Duke University in Durham, North Carolina to
examine the University's homeland security research
laboratories and receive a briefing by researchers on their on-
going Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology
Directorate-funded research, which seeks to develop future
generations of airport screening technologies.

AVIATION SECURITY

The leadership of the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) receives a daily classified aviation
intelligence briefing at the TSA headquarters in Arlington,
Virginia every morning. On February 14, 2013, the Chair of the
Subcommittee attended this briefing to better understand the
terrorist threats to U.S. transportation systems.
On March 7, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Comptroller General of the U. S. requesting to be
a co-requestor of the Government Accountability Offices (GAO)
review of TSA's Secure Flight Program.
On March 20, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee received an update from the Administrator of TSA
on TSA's Screening Partnership Program.
In 2003, Congress directed the Department of Homeland
Security through the Vision 100-Century Aviation
Reauthorization Act (Pub. L. 108-176) to develop a program to
ensure security of domestic and international aircraft repair
stations. After no action was taken, in 2007 Congress mandated
through the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission
Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-53), that TSA issue a final rule on
aircraft repair station security by August 2008, otherwise the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would no longer be
authorized to certificate new foreign repair stations for U.S.-
bound aircraft, Implementing. The TSA missed the deadline, and
FAA certifications of new foreign repair stations were halted.
In November 2009, TSA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) for repair station security, with the comment period
ending on February 19, 2010. Although the comment period ended
over three years ago, TSA has yet to issue a final rule. On
March 14, 2013, the TSA Administrator announced to the
Subcommittee at the hearing entitled ``TSA's Efforts to Advance
Risk-Based Security,'' that the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) received the rule. In response to the announcement, the
Chair and Vice Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter on April
18, 2013, to the Deputy Director for Management of the Office
of Management and Budget regarding the status of the Aircraft
Foreign Repair Station Rulemaking.
The Department of Homeland Security's FY 2014 budget
request eliminated funding for TSA's Federal Flight Deck
Officer (FFDO) program. On June 6, 2013, the Chairs of the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security and the Subcommittee on
Oversight and Management Efficiency sent a letter to the
Secretary of Homeland Security expressing concern over the
proposed elimination of funding for the FFDO program. The
Department provided a response on July 29, 2013.
On September 25, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Comptroller General of the U.S. requesting to be
a co-requester of GAO's review of TSA's Pre-Check trusted
traveler program.

TSA'S BEHAVIOR DETECTION AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM

The Transportation Security Administration's (TSA)
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques (SPOT)
program involves Behavior Detection Officers (BDO) observing
passenger behavior inside the airport. BDOs are trained to
detect individuals exhibiting suspicious behaviors that
indicate they may be a threat to transportation security.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on November 14, 2013,
entitled ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial Lessons From the LAX
Shooting.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John
S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Dr.
Daniel Gerstein, Acting Under Secretary, Science and Technology
Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stephen
M. Lord, Managing Director, Forensic Audits and Investigative
Service, Government Accountability Office; and Mr. Charles K.
Edwards, Deputy Inspector General, Office of Inspector General,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of this
hearing was to examine challenges with TSA's SPOT Program and
to gauge whether SPOT is a scientifically valid program.
On May 29, 2013, the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued a report on the
SPOT program entitled Transportation Security Administration's
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques [OIG-13-91].
The OIG concluded in its report that: TSA did not assess the
effectiveness of the SPOT program; have a comprehensive
training program for SPOT; ensure outreach to its partners
regarding the implementation and operation of SPOT; or have a
financial plan for the SPOT Program prior to Nation-wide
implementation.
On September 9, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Comptroller General of the U.S. requesting to be
a co-requester of a Government Accountability Office (GAO)
review of TSA's SPOT program.
On November 13, 2013, GAO released a report entitled, TSA
Should Limit Future Funding for Behavior Detection Activities.
[GAO-14-158T] The report found, among other things, that
available evidence does not conclusively support whether
behavioral indicators, which are used in the SPOT program, can
be used to identify persons who may pose a risk to aviation
security.

CANINE BREEDING PROGRAM

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) canceled
its explosive detection canine breeding program at Lackland Air
force Base based on a determination that the program was not
producing enough explosives detection canines to justify the
annual costs. In response to TSA's decision, on June 18, 2013,
the Chair and Vice Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to
the Secretary of Homeland Security expressing concerns about
how the research and development that was achieved under the
program would be used in the future. The Department provided a
response on July 15, 2013.

SHOOTING AT THE LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

On November 1, 2013, a gunman entered Terminal 3 of the Los
Angeles International Airport (LAX), approached the passenger
screening area and shot and killed Gerardo I. Hernandez, a
Transportation Security Officer (TSO) who was checking
passenger boarding passes. After shooting and killing Officer
Hernandez, the first TSA employee to be killed while performing
his duties, the gunman shot and injured two additional TSOs and
one passenger, none of whom were fatally wounded. Upon
engaging, shooting, and taking the gunman down, Officers of the
Los Angeles World Airport's Police Division found a note on the
gunman's person expressing anti-government views and his intent
to target and kill TSA employees.
On November 15, 2013, the Chair and Ranking Member of the
Full Committee, the Chair and Ranking Memmber of the
Subcommittee and Representatives Waters and McKeon introduced
H.Res. 415, expressing the sense of the House of
Representatives with respect to the tragic shooting at LAX and
honoring the dedicated public service of the TSO killed and the
TSOs injured in the incident.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based Security.'' March 14,
2013. (Serial No. 113-5)
``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-Based Security: Stakeholder
Perspectives.'' April 11. (Serial No. 113-5)
``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving Taxpayer Dollars Through
Smarter Spending Practices.'' May 8, 2013. (Serial No.
113-15)
``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA Acquisition Reform.'' July
17, 2013. (Serial No. 113-26)
``TSA Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by Airport
Security Personnel.'' Joint hearing with the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security. July 31, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-29)
``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial Lessons From the LAX
Shooting.'' November 14, 2013. (Serial No. 113-43)
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

----------

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications held six hearings, receiving testimony from 31
witnesses.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS ALLOWABLE USE ACT

H.R. 1791

Summary

H.R. 1791 amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107-296) to ensure that grants funds may continue to be used
for medical preparedness activities.

Legislative History

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

SUPERSTORM SANDY

Superstorm Sandy made landfall in New Jersey on October 29,
2012. Impacting the East Coast from Florida to Maine, the
National Hurricane Center cites damage estimates of $50
billion, the second costliest disaster in U.S. history. In
response to the storm, Congress passed the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, which the President signed on January 29,
2013 (Pub. L. 113-2). This Act appropriated $50 billion to fund
response and recovery efforts related to the storm. To date,
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has provided
more than $1.4 billion in Individual Assistance to disaster
survivors and $3.2 billion in Public Assistance to state,
local, and tribal governments for emergency protective
measures, debris removal, and repair and replacement of
infrastructure in the hardest hit areas. Throughout the 113th
Congress, the Subcommittee has conducted oversight of Federal
efforts to assist states, localities, tribes, and individuals
impacted by the storm.
On January 11, 2013, Committee staff attended the FEMA
Office of Response and Recovery's quarterly briefing and
received an update on changes to the National Flood Insurance
Program and Hurricane Sandy recovery.
On February 12, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee
conducted a site visit to FEMAs National Response Coordination
Center in Washington, D.C. This visit provided Members with an
overview of FEMA's mission, operations, and efforts to work
with its State, local, and private sector partners as well as
ongoing Superstorm Sandy recovery efforts. Members met with the
FEMA Administrator and other officials from throughout the
agency. Following the briefing, Members toured the National
Response Coordination Center.
The Members of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit to
the American Red Cross' Disaster Operations Center and Digital
Disaster Operations Center on March 12, 2013. The visit
provided information on the Red Cross' role in disaster
response and services it provides through its local chapters,
including an update on the Red Cross' response to Superstorm
Sandy.
On March 15, 2013, Committee staff attended the FEMA Office
of Response and Recovery's quarterly briefing and received an
update on implementation of the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act
of 2013 (Pub. L. 113-2), changes to the National Flood
Insurance Program, and Tribal declarations.
On March 25, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
of the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector
General to discuss oversight of Hurricane Sandy response and
recovery efforts.
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Comptroller General of the U.S. on April 22, 2013, requesting
that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) review
Individual Assistance provided by FEMA after Superstorm Sandy
to ensure there were no improper payments. The GAO has agreed
to this request and the review is ongoing.
On June 10, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the
U.S. requesting that GAO conduct a review of FEMA's response to
Superstorm Sandy, including a comparison with the Agency's
response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The GAO has agreed to
this request and the review is ongoing.
Committee staff attended the FEMA Office of Response an
Recovery's quarterly briefing on June 28, 2013, and received an
update on the implementation of the Sandy Recovery Improvements
Act and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
On August 26, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives from GAO to discuss their review of improper
Individual Assistance payments made by the FEMA in the
aftermath of Superstorm Sandy.
The Chair of the Subcommittee met with representatives of
the American Red Cross on October 2, 2013 to discuss ongoing
Red Cross response and recovery efforts to Superstorm Sandy.
On October 21, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Department of Health and Human Services'
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response
regarding its efforts in response to Superstorm Sandy and
lessons learned for future response efforts.

DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY

Since the beginning of the 113th Congress, states and
localities have experienced a string of disasters including: a
successful terrorist attack in Boston, tornadoes in multiple
states, wildfires, and flooding. It is imperative that the
Federal Government, along with its partners at the State and
local levels and the private sector, work to prepare for and
respond to terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and other
emergencies.
Members of the Subcommittee attended a briefing conducted
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on March 21,
2013, to obtain information on National Flood Week.
On March 28, 2013, Committee staff attended a briefing on
the implementation of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform
Act of 2012 (Subtitle A of Title II, of Pub. L. 113-41).
On June 6, 2013, Committee staff attended a briefing
conducted by FEMA on the roll out of the Planning Frameworks
mandated by Presidential Policy Directive-8 (PPD-8: National
Preparedness).
On June 10, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the
U.S. requesting that the Government Accountability Office (GAO)
review the use of disaster assistance funding for direct
administrative costs. The GAO has agreed to this request and
the review is ongoing.
On June 21, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and
Communications the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiency, the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and
the Chair of the Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee on
Emergency Management, Intergovernmental Affairs, and the
District of Columbia, sent a letter to the Administrator of
FEMA, regarding its Public Assistance program. The Committee
received an interim response to this letter on November 26,
2013.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Department of Homeland Security's National Protection and
Programs Directorate and the United States Secret Service, the
Department of Education, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation on July 31, 2013 on interagency school security
efforts.
On August 6, 2013, the Subcommittee held a field hearing in
Carmel, Indiana entitled ``Assessing Central Indiana's
Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr. Andrew Velasquez, III, Regional
Administrator, FEMA Region 5, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. John Hill, Executive Director, Indiana Department
of Homeland Security; Mr. Mark Bowen, Sheriff, Hamilton County,
Indiana; Mr. Steven Orusa, Fire Chief, Fishers, Indiana; Ms.
Diane Mack, University Director, Emergency Management and
Continuity, Indiana University; Mr. Chad Priest, Chief
Executive Officer, MESH Coalition, Inc.; Dr. Virginia Caine,
Director, Public Health Administration, Marion County (IN)
Public Health Department; Louis Profeta, M.D., F.A.C.E.P.,
Medical Director of Disaster Preparedness, St. Vincent
Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana; Dr. H. Clifton Knight, Chief
Medical Officer, Community Health Network; R. Lawrence Reed,
II, M.D., F.A.C.S., F.C.C., Director of Trauma Services,
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital; and Dr. Mercy
Obeime, Director, Community and Global Health, Franciscan St.
Francis Health, Indianapolis, Indiana. This hearing explored
ongoing efforts at the Federal, State, local, and non-profit
level to secure our most vital assets from a wide range of
threats, including mass casualty events.
The Chair of the Subcommittee addressed the Hazus Users
Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana on August 7, 2013.
On August 28, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives from FEMA regarding preparations for
addressing the needs of children during disasters.
On September 4, 2013, Committee staff conducted a site
visit of the Mount Weather Emergency Operations Center in
Virginia to receive a tour and briefing of the Federal
Government's continuity of operations programs.
Committee staff participated in a conference call held by
the FEMA on September 17, 2013, regarding the response to the
wildfires in Colorado.
On September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Assessing the Nation's State of Preparedness: A
Federal, State, and Local Perspective.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Hon. Timothy Manning, Deputy
Administrator, Protection and National Preparedness, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. Mark Ghilarducci, Director, California Governor's
Office of Emergency Services, testifying on behalf of the
National Governors Association and the Governors Homeland
Security Advisors Council; Mr. Jeffrey W. Walker, Senior
Emergency Manager, Licking County, Ohio, testifying on behalf
of the International Association of Emergency Managers; Chief
James H. Schwartz, Fire Chief, Arlington County Fire
Department, Arlington, Virginia, testifying on behalf of the
International Association of Fire Chiefs; Ms. Kathy Spangler,
Vice President, U.S. Programs, Save the Children. This hearing
provided Subcommittee Members with an opportunity to reflect on
the gains the nation has made in preparedness over the past 12
years and the challenges that still remain.
Committee staff received a classified briefing from
representatives from FEMA regarding its continuity of
operations and continuity of government operations on September
23, 2013.
On November 19, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee
participated in a panel discussion hosted by POLITICO in
Washington, D.C. on emergency and disaster response.

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS

The mission of the Department of Homeland Security's Office
of Health Affairs is to provide health and medical expertise in
support of the Department's mission to prepare for, respond to,
and recover from all hazards impacting the Nation's health
security. As a result, the Subcommittee conducted a number of
oversight activities related to the Office of Health Affairs
and other vital medical preparedness activities.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Health
Affairs (OHA) on February 28, 2013, on OHA's mission and
programs, including BioWatch, the National Biosurveillance
Integration Center, and workforce health initiatives.
On April 3, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from the American College of Emergency Physicians.
On April 11, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from OHA to discuss the President's Fiscal Year 2014 budget
request for OHA.
The Chair of the Subcommittee met with the Director, Office
of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention on April 18, 2013, to discuss medical
preparedness and the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS).
On May 6, 2013, Committee staff met with the DHS Acting
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs to discuss medial
preparedness and OHA priorities.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Department
of Health and Human Services' Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Preparedness and Response to receive a briefing on current
operations.
The Chair of the Subcommittee gave the keynote address at
the National Emergency Support Function 8 conference in
Indianapolis, Indiana on June 25, 2013.
On July 2, 2013, Committee staff participated in a
conference call held by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention regarding the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
(MERS) virus and H7N9 influenza.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Emergency
Services Coalition on Medical Preparedness on July 9, 2013, to
discuss medical countermeasures for first responders.
On September 3, 2013, Committee staff met with the Acting
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs to discuss ongoing
activities within the Office of Health Affairs.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Institute of Medicine on September 11, 2013 regarding their
report on the resilience of the Department of Homeland Security
workforce.

OUTREACH TO STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE PRIVATE
SECTOR

Throughout the 113th Congress, Committee staff met with
various Federal agencies and stakeholder groups representing
the first responder and emergency management communities to
discuss issues of concern to their membership. These meetings
included the International Association of Fire Chiefs, the
National Emergency Management Association, the International
Association of Emergency Managers, the National Sheriff's
Association, the Major Cities Chiefs, the Jewish Federations of
North America, and the American Red Cross.
On February 11, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee visited
the Indiana Intelligence Fusion Center to learn more about
their mission and their experience sharing information with
Federal, State, and local partners.
On February 15, 2013, Committee staff conducted a
conference call with the Executive Director of the Indiana
Department of Homeland Security to receive an update on the
Department's priorities.
On March 20, 2013, Committee staff participated in a panel
discussion at the National Emergency Management Association's
(NEMA) Mid Year Conference. Subsequently, on March 21, 2013,
Committee staff attended a briefing with NEMA leadership to
receive an update on their priorities.
The Chair of the Subcommittee addressed a roundtable held
by the Congressional Fire Services Institute on May 9, 2013.
The Chair of the Subcommittee visited emergency management
officials within Indiana on numerous occasions throughout the
113th Congress; including in Hamilton County, on May 29, 2013,
and Madison County on June 21, 2013.
On August 7, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee addressed
the National Association of State Fire Marshals Annual
Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Committee staff met with representatives of the 9/11 Museum
Commission to discuss security efforts at the 9/11 Memorial
site on November 21, 2013.

EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS AND INDIVIDUALS

The Department of Homeland Security has distributed nearly
$40 billion in grants to States and localities since the
attacks of September 11, 2001. Administered by Federal
Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Grant Programs
Directorate, this funding is used to help jurisdictions
prevent, prepare for, mitigate, and respond to terrorist
attacks.
In furtherance of the Subcommittee's work to ensure that
grant expenditures are appropriately measured and monitored, on
February 22, and 28, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives from FEMA to learn about its grants monitoring
procedures and efforts to measure the effectiveness of these
grants.
Subsequent to these meetings, on March 19, 2013, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Homeland Security
Grants: Measuring Our Investments.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. Tim Manning, Deputy Administrator,
Protection and National Preparedness, Federal Emergency
Management Agency. Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Anne
Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security; and Mr.
David C. Maurer, Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office. This hearing examined
the effectiveness and efficiency of homeland security grants
and provided Members an opportunity to examine: The impact of
these grants; how these grant dollars are utilized; how the
impact is being; measured and how the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) and FEMA are ensuring that grants are being used
in a manner appropriate to their intent.
On March 28, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
of the National Fusion Center Association regarding the use of
grants by fusion centers.
Committee staff met with representatives of numerous local
stakeholder groups on April 26, 2013, to discuss the proposed
National Preparedness Grant Program.
On May 9, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives of
the National Governors' Association to discuss grants.
Committee staff received a briefing from the FEMA's Grant
Programs Directorate on May 20, 2013 on the Fiscal Year 2013
guidance for the Homeland Security Grant Program and other FEMA
administered programs.
On June 13, 2013, Committee staff met with the Assistant
Administrator of FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate to discuss
FEMA's preparedness grants.
Committee staff participated in a conference call held by
FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate on June 17, 2013 regarding
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessments.
On June 18, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee received
a classified briefing on the risk formula employed by FEMA to
allocate State Homeland Security Grant Program and Urban Areas
Security Initiative grants. Representatives from the FEMA's
Grant Programs Directorate, the Office of Intelligence and
Analysis, the Office of Infrastructure Protection, and Customs
and Border Protection were present to respond to Member
questions.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives
from FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate on Fiscal Year 2013
grant awards on August 22, 2013.
Committee staff participated in a panel discussion at the
National Governors Association Governors Homeland Security
Advisors Council annual meeting on September 20, 2013,
regarding homeland security grants.
On September 25, 2013, Committee staff attended a briefing
with representatives DHS's Office of Intelligence and Analysis
regarding the National Network of Fusion Centers Assessment,
including the use of grants to fund fusion centers.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate on efforts to monitor grant
funds on November 12, 2013.

PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND
NUCLEAR THREATS

Terrorists actively plot and have attempted to use weapons
of mass destruction (WMD) to attack the United States. At a
2010 Committee on Homeland Security hearing with the
Commissioners of the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of
Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism (WMD Commission),
the Commissioners noted that ``it is more likely than not that
there will be a weapon of mass destruction used someplace on
earth by a terrorist group before the end of the year 2013 and
that it is more likely that the weapons will be biological
rather than nuclear.'' In the WMD Commission's report card on
the Nation's efforts to protect the Nation for WMD terrorism,
the Government received a grade of ``F'' on its efforts to
enhance the Nation's capabilities for rapid response to prevent
biological attacks from inflicting mass casualties.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives
from Sandia National Laboratory regarding BioWatch and
Generation--3 on January 29, 2013.
On February 1, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Government Accountability Office (GAO)
to receive a briefing on agricultural security.
On February 25, 2013, Committee staff met with the Director
of Texas A&M University's Foreign and Zoonotic Disease Defense
(FAZD) Center to receive a briefing of FAZD's biosurveillance
efforts.
On March 5, 2013, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on the Office of Health Affairs' BioWatch program. The
Assistant Secretary, Office of Health Affairs conducted the
briefing and responded to Member questions.
On March 25, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from GAO to discuss their work on BioWatch.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Health
Affairs on April 3, 2013, regarding the National
Biosurveillance Integration Center.
On May 6, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives from FEMA on the Radiological Emergency
Preparedness Program.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Center for
Strategic and International Studies and Sandia National
Laboratory regarding the release of their report, A Biological
Threat Prevention Strategy.
The Chair of the Subcommittee met with the DHS's
Undersecretary for Science and Technology to discuss chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear threats.
On September 25, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the Office of Health Affairs regarding
its Chemical Defense Program.
The Chair and Ranking Member of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the
U.S. on September 25, 2013, requesting that GAO review the
progress made by the National Biosurveillance Integration
Center, including an update of its December 2009 report,
Biosurveillance: Developing a Collaboration Strategy is
Essential to Fostering Interagency Data and Resource Sharing.
On November 15, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee
received a classified briefing on the Office of Health Affairs
Chemical Defense Program. Representatives from the Office of
Health Affairs, along with representatives from DHS's Office of
Intelligence and Analysis, were present to brief the Members
and respond to their questions.

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, exposed
communications failures with catastrophic implications.
Communications challenges persisted during Hurricane Katrina.
Since that time, great strides have been made in interoperable
communications, including through the National Emergency
Communications Plan and its associated goals and the
establishment of the First Responder Network Authority
(FirstNet). However, communications challenges remain.
On January 28, 2013, Committee staff attended a roundtable
to get stakeholder perspectives on the FirstNet and the
development of the National Public Safety Broadband Network
(PSBN).
Committee staff met with representatives of the Office of
Emergency Communications on February 22, 2013, to discuss the
Department of Homeland Security's role on the FirstNet board
and with the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC).
On April 11, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials
(APCO) International to discuss SAFECOM and the National Public
Safety Broadband Network.
On April 12, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Office of Emergency Communications to receive a
briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2014 budget request for
the Office.
The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on April 16, 2013,
on the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Emergency
Communications. The Director of the Office of Emergency
Communications, provided Members with an overview of OEC and
its role in the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet).
Committee staff met with representatives of the Interagency
Communications Interoperability System on May 22, 2013
regarding the Public Safety Broadband Network and the T-Band.
On July 18, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Department of Commerce's National
Telecommunications and Information Administration and the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Emergency
Communications on FirstNet and the development of the Public
Safety Broadband Network.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Office of Emergency Communications regarding OEC's efforts
to update the National Emergency Communications Plan on
September 6, 2013.
On September 24, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of APCO International to discuss public safety
communications issue.
On November 21, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Director of the Office of Emergency
Communications, regarding the need to update the National
Emergency Communications plan and requesting additional
information on the Office of Emergency Communications' efforts
to do so.

SOCIAL MEDIA AND NEW TECHNOLOGY

In today's technology driven world, social media and other
types of new technology are becoming one of the primary ways
people receive, process, and relay information. Studies have
shown that more than 60 percent of the people in the United
States have at least one social media account, with many having
multiple accounts including Facebook pages, Twitter profiles,
and Pinterest boards. While social media originally started out
as a way to share information among friends, it is evident that
it has evolved to serve other functions, and is a prevalent
source for news, advertising, and entertainment. There were
numerous stories from Hurricane Sandy, the Boston Bombings, and
the Oklahoma tornados of how citizens used Facebook, Twitter,
and Instagram to relay information to first responders,
communicate with love ones, and request assistance. The
management of ``big data'' and the use of social media can
provide enormous opportunities for efficiencies in emergency
management.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on April 11, 2013, to
discuss the Agency's use of social media, particularly as an
aid in disaster response operations.
On June 4, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are
Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery #Disasters
#Part1 #Privatesector.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr. Matthew Stepka, Vice President, Technology for Social
Impact, Google.org; Mr. Jason Matthew Payne, Philanthropy Lead,
Palantir Technologies; Mr. Michael Beckerman, President and
CEO, The Internet Association; and Mr. Jorge L. Cardenas, Vice
President, Asset Management and Centralized Services, Public
Service Enterprise Group, Inc. This hearing examined advances
in social media and technology and their applications for
disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.
The Subcommittee continued its hearing on Emergency
Management 2.0, with a hearing on July 9, 2013, entitled
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are
Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery #Disasters
#Part2 #Govt/NGOs.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr. Shayne Adamski, Senior Manager of Digital Engagement,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Ms. Suzanne C. DeFrancis, Chief Public
Affairs Officer, American Red Cross; Mr. Albert Ashwood,
Chairman, NEMA Legislative Committee, Director, Oklahoma
Department of Emergency Management, testifying on behalf of the
National Emergency Management Association; and Sergeant W. Greg
Kierce, Director, Jersey City Office of Emergency, Management
and Homeland Security. This hearing continued the discussion
that began at the June 4th hearing and examined how emergency
management practitioners are leveraging social media and new
technology and working with the private sector to enhance their
preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities, particularly
through the lens of recent disasters.
In preparation for these hearings, Committee staff met with
various stakeholders in the public and private sectors to learn
more about the applications of social media and new technology
for disaster response and recovery.
On June 12, 2013, the Chair of the Subcommittee met with
the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology
Undersecretary and the Director of the First Response Division
to discuss advancements in technology for disaster preparedness
and first responders.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Department
of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate on
June 27, 2013 ,to discuss the Virtual Social Media Working
Group.
On July 31, 2013, Committee staff met with representatives
from FEMA to discuss FEMA's implementation of Executive Order
13642, Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for
Government Information.
Committee staff attended the Social Media in Emergency
summit at George Washington University on August 13, 2013.
As a result of testimony about the need for open and
machine readable disaster related data received by the
Subcommittee at the June 4th Emergency MGMT 2.0 hearing, on
November 19, 2013, the Chair and the Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications, the Chair of the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence, the Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies, and other Members of the Committee, sent
a letter to the Administrator of FEMA, regarding implementation
of the requirements of Executive Order 13642.

ALERTS AND WARNINGS

Terrorist attacks and natural disasters can occur at any
time, often with little-to-no notice. Alerts and warnings
provided in advance of potential threats and hazards can help
to direct the public to seek safety. The benefit of alerts and
warnings were evident during the November 2013 outbreak of
tornadoes in the Midwest. Messages through sirens, television,
radio, and cell phones alerted citizens to seek shelter from
the storm and many noted that those messages got them out of
harm's way.
On April 22, 2013, Committee staff held a conference call
with representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) to discuss the Integrated Public Alert and Warning
System (IPAWS).
On May 7, 2013, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing on
FEMA's IPAWS. The Assistant Administrator of FEMA's National
Continuity Programs (NCP) Directorate responded to Member
concerns.
Committee staff also met with stakeholders regarding alerts
and warnings on numerous occasions throughout the 113th
Congress.
Committee staff participated in a conference call with
representatives from FEMA to discuss IPAWS and the application
of new technologies.
Committee staff met with stakeholders to discuss
legislation to authorize the Integrated Public Alert and
Warning System on November 19, 2013.

TRAINING AND EXERCISES

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), through its
National Exercise Division and partners such as the National
Preparedness Consortium, supports training and exercises for
emergency response providers. As terrorist continually change
their tactics, these programs are vital for emergency response
providers so they are prepared for the threats and hazards they
face.
On February 11, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of Texas A&M University, a member of the
National Domestic Preparedness Consortium, to receive an update
on current operations and training programs.
On February 15, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of New Mexico Tech's Center for Explosives
Research and Education, a member of the National Domestic
Preparedness Consortium, to receive an update on its training
programs.
Committee staff attended a briefing held by member
universities in the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium
on April 29, 2013.
On July 15, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of FEMA's National Exercise Division on the
National Exercise Program.
Committee staff visited Texas A&M University on August 14
and 15, 2013 to observe homeland security and emergency
management training programs at the Texas Engineering Extension
Service and learn about other homeland security programs
conducted by Texas A&M. The visit included a tour of Disaster
City.
On November 1, 2013, Committee staff visited the Maryland
Fire Rescue Institute to observe and participate in firefighter
training and response activities.

CYBER INCIDENT RESPONSE

A cyber attack on critical infrastructure could have
damaging cascading physical effects, and as such, state and
local emergency management officials must be prepared to
respond. While gains in cyber incident response capabilities
have been made, the 2013 National Preparedness Report again
highlights States' concerns about their cybersecurity
capabilities. It is vital that the Federal Government share
information with emergency response providers about the cyber
threat so they are prepared to respond.
On April 25, 2013, Committee staff attended a workshop held
by CNA on cyberpreparedness.
On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and
Communications held a joint classified Member tour and briefing
at the Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity
and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC).
Committee staff attended a briefing held by the National
Governors Association's Resource Center for State Cybersecurity
on September 26, 2013 on the release of its report, Act and
Adjust: A Call to Action for Governors for Cybersecurity.
On October 30, 2013, the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the Subcommittee
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies held a joint hearing entitled ``Cyber Incident
Response: Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms.
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary,
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National Protection
and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Mr. Charley English, Director, Georgia Emergency Management
Agency, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency
Management Association; Mr. Craig Orgeron, Chief Information
Officer and Executive Director, Department of Information
Technology Services, State of Mississippi, testifying on behalf
of the National Association of State Chief Information
Officers; Mr. Mike Sena, Deputy Director, Northern California
Regional Intelligence Center, testifying on behalf of the
National Fusion Center Association; and Mr. Paul Molitor,
Assistant Vice President, National Electrical Manufacturers
Association. This hearing examined the extent of cyber threat
information sharing and response capabilities to a cyber
incident with physical consequences.
In preparation for this hearing, Committee staff met with
stakeholders to discuss information sharing related to cyber
threats and cyber incident response capabilities. On September
18, 2013, Committee staff also received a briefing from
representatives of the Department of Homeland Security's Office
of Cybersecurity and Communications on the Department's efforts
to share cyber threat information with emergency response
providers.

DEFENSE SUPPORT TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES

In times of emergency, Federal, State, and local civilian
response agencies can greatly benefit from the experience and
capabilities of the United States Military, be it active duty,
National Guard, or reserve forces. It is vital that civilian
agencies are aware of and can leverage the support that the
military is willing and able to provide.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of
Defense on April 2, 2013, regarding the use of the Defense
Production Act (Pub. L. 81-774) for disaster response
activities.
On October 3, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the National Governors Association
regarding the issue of dual status command.
Committee staff attended a briefing with the United States
Army Reserve on November 20, 2013 to discuss the role of the
military in disaster response and the military's response to
Superstorm Sandy.

MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Efficient and effective management of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is vital to ensuring its ability to
meet its mission. Without the successful execution of
management and operations, the Agency will not be able to
fulfill its mission.
On April 8, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives from FEMA on its Qualification System and other
workforce initiatives.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency on April 12, 2013 to receive a
briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2014 budget request for
FEMA.
On November 21, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of FEMA's Mission Support Bureau to receive a
briefing on the Bureau's functions and operations.
Committee staff met with representatives of FEMA's Office
of the Chief Human Capital Officer on December 6, 2013, to
receive a briefing on issues related to hiring, training,
performance management, and employee morale.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Homeland Security Grants: Measuring Our Investments'' March
19, 2013. (Serial No. 113-6)
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are
Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery
#Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.'' June 4, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-20)
``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How #SocialMedia & New Tech are
Transforming Preparedness, Response, & Recovery
#Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.'' July 9, 2013. (Serial
No. 113-20)
``Assessing Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty
Event.'' Field hearing in Carmel, Indiana, August 6,
2013. (Serial No. 113-31)
``Assessing the Nation's State of Preparedness: A Federal,
State, and Local Perspective.'' September 19, 2013.
(Serial No. 113-35)
``Cyber Incident Response: Bridging the Gap Between
Cybersecurity and Emergency Management.''Joint hearing
with the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies. October 30,
2013. (Serial No. 113-39)
Oversight Plan of the Committee on Homeland Security for the 113th
Congress

Clause 2(d), Rule X of the Rules of the House of
Representatives for the 113th Congress requires each standing
Committee to adopt an oversight plan for the two-year period of
the Congress and to submit the plan to the Committees on
Oversight and Government Reform and House Administration not
later than February 15th of the first session of the Congress.
Rule XI, clause 1(2)(d)(1) requires each Committee to
submit to the House of Representatives not later than January
2, of each odd-numbered year, a report on the activities of
that committee under Rule X and Rule XI during the Congress
ending on January 3 of such year. Clause 1(2)(d)(3) of Rule XI
also requires that such report include a summary of the action
taken and recommendations made with respect to each such plan;
and a summary of any additional oversight activities undertaken
by the Committee, and any recommendations made or actions taken
thereon.
Part A of this section contains the Committee on Homeland
Security Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress which the Full
Committee considered and adopted by unanimous consent on
January 23, 2013, a quorum being present.
Part B of this section contains a summary of the actions
taken by the Committee on Homeland Security to implement the
Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress and the recommendations
made with respect to this plan. Part B also contains a summary
of the additional oversight activities undertaken by the
Committee, and the recommendations made or actions taken
thereon.

PART A--COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY OVERSIGHT PLAN

This is the oversight plan for the Committee on Homeland
Security for the 113th Congress. It includes the areas in which
the Committee expects to conduct oversight during the 113th
Congress, but does not preclude oversight or investigation of
additional matters as needs arise. The Full Committee will
examine the following four key priorities, among other issues.

PREVENTING A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE HOMELAND

Our enemies continuously plot to harm Americans. As we saw
warning signs prior to the 9/11 attacks including the bombings
of our embassies in Africa and attack on the USS Cole, we are
experiencing events today, which should cause concern. The Arab
spring has brought some welcome changes to the Middle East.
However, the region has also witnessed some dangerous warning
signs, such as the assassination of our US Ambassador in
Benghazi along with three other Americans. We now see radical
and dangerous groups achieving political prominence in the
Middle East. This is a dangerous time for our nation and we
cannot become complacent about the threats against us.
During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
persisting threats to Americans and American interests from Al
Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and new and emerging
threats such as Iran and Hezbollah in the Western hemisphere.
The Committee will assess the various vulnerabilities of our
nation's systems and mechanisms that dangerous people and
entities aspire to exploit, such as our aviation and other
transit systems, our cyber networks, and critical
infrastructure control systems. The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) has the responsibility to protect Americans from
these dangers and the Committee intends to examine the
Department's relevant strategies and capabilities.
The Committee will also continue to evaluate the Obama
Administration's policy concerning the Detention Center at the
US Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This oversight will
include a review of the Secretary of Homeland Security's role
as a member of the President's Guantanamo Detention Task Force,
as outlined in Executive Order 13492. Furthermore, the
examination will include a review of the potential risk of
holding high-value detainees, such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
and other co-conspirators of the attacks of September 11th on
domestic soil; the risk of inadvertent disclosure of sensitive
information during the trial; and the recommendations delivered
by the Department as part of the Guantanamo Review Task Force.

securing our borders

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to
examine the Department's efforts to secure land and maritime
borders of the United States. The Committee will assess
programs and technologies used to secure U.S. land borders on
the north and the south, as well as the Caribbean region. The
Committee will also examine how the Department is leveraging
defense technologies to effectively secure the borders and how
best to utilize equipment coming re-deployed from Iraq and
Afghanistan. The Committee will continue to monitor the threat
of spill-over violence stemming from the rise of drug cartels
and the violent conflict throughout Mexico.

protecting against cyber attacks

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Department's role in hardening our national critical
infrastructure against cyber attacks by fortifying Federal and
civilian networks and collaborating with the private sector to
reduce vulnerabilities. The Committee will review the
integration of the various cyber missions carried out across
the Federal government and will monitor the Department's role
in fulfilling its goals in order to prevent a catastrophic
cyber attack. The Committee will ensure that the Department
facilitates the improved security of our Nation's critical
infrastructure while earning and building on the trust of the
owners and operators of that infrastructure.

managing dhs with a business-model approach

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will oversee the
Department of Homeland Security's management and operations to
ensure that it is functioning in the most efficient manner
possible and accountable to the American people. The Committee
will work to identify potential opportunities to leverage
proven private sector best practices, find efficiencies that
will contribute to the Department's ability to meet its vital
missions, and identify areas for cost savings. The Committee
intends to conduct oversight and ensure better business
practices in areas, such as acquisition, financial management,
information technology, and employee morale.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

counterterrorism

The security of the American homeland is linked to
international security as vulnerabilities in one part of the
world can quickly become security threats in another. During
the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the Department's
international counterterrorism activities. This review will
include examining the roles, responsibilities, and resources
devoted by the Department and its components to achieving
United States goals to combat terrorism overseas.
The Committee will examine the counterterrorism policies of
the US government, with a focus on the Department of Homeland
Security. This examination will include an assessment of the
worldwide threat against the US homeland from various groups,
such as Al Qaeda core, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
(AQAP), Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), al Shahbab,
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Boko
Haram, and other emerging terrorist groups. The Committee will
also examine Iran's sponsorship of terrorism via its proxies,
most notably Hezbollah, including expanding ties in the western
hemisphere. This examination will include the extent to which
the Department's strategic planning efforts address these
threats. The Committee will monitor the homeland security
ramifications of potential military action against the illicit
Iranian nuclear program and the geopolitical ramifications
across the Middle East and North Africa. The Committee will
also monitor issues related to homegrown terrorist threats,
economic threats, and terrorist travel and financing issues.

counterintelligence

Throughout the 113th Congress, the Committee will track the
development of the Department of Homeland Security
Counterintelligence Program, to ensure it is fully meeting the
Department's needs. DHS's counterintelligence efforts are
intended to prevent adversaries from penetrating the Department
to exploit sensitive information, operations, programs,
personnel, and resources.

unconventional and emerging threats

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
capabilities and efforts of the Department to identify,
prevent, deter, and respond to emerging future threats. For
example, GPS navigation systems have a significant impact on
the daily lives of most Americans but these systems are highly
susceptible to being jammed and hijacked. These threats could
disrupt civil aviation and emergency communications, attack
global financial exchanges, and corrupt the energy grid. The
Committee will monitor the extent to which the Department
effectively coordinates and collaborates with other relevant US
agencies to mitigate these threats to the homeland.

homeland security intelligence enterprise

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will conduct
oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's Intelligence
Enterprise, including intelligence activities throughout the
Department and component agencies. This will include a focus on
the coordination and collaboration across intelligence offices
and personnel within the Headquarters' elements and component
agencies. Additionally, the Committee will review efforts to
build the intelligence, analytical, and assessment capabilities
of the Department and to ensure its full participation in the
Intelligence Community as part of its homeland security
mission. This will include an examination of the hiring
authorities, practices, and career-development of intelligence
analysts and professionals within Headquarters elements and
component agencies. The Committee will examine the Department's
role in managing, distributing, and otherwise using terrorist
threat information in furtherance of its homeland security
mission. The Committee will also examine national security
clearance policies and processes within the Department.

information sharing

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
progress being made to improve terrorist and homeland security
information sharing efforts among Federal, state, and local
governments, law enforcement entities, first responders,
emergency management personnel, and the private sector. The
Committee will examine the Department of Homeland Security's
efforts to coordinate information sharing efforts from across
the Federal government to and from state and local fusion
centers throughout the country. As part of this examination,
the Committee will review the efficacy and efficiency of state
and local fusion centers to determine their impact on securing
the homeland.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

border security

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to
examine the Department's efforts to secure land and maritime
borders of the United States, including but not limited to
personnel, technology, infrastructure, and coordination. The
Committee will also assess the status of programs and
international agreements to secure US land borders on the north
and the south, as well as the Caribbean region, from illegal
entry by persons or contraband. The Committee will monitor the
extent to which the Department can measure its performance in
securing the borders and how these measures reflect the state
of border security.
The Committee will also examine the technologies used to
secure the borders. Specifically, the Committee will conduct
oversight of the Department's acquisitions of border
technologies, such as those used in the Arizona Border
Surveillance Technology Plan, and examine the extent to which
the Department is leveraging defense technologies, such as
unmanned aerial systems, to effectively secure the borders.
This oversight will also include the Department's use of aerial
assets in support of border security. The Committee will
continue to monitor the threat of spill-over violence stemming
from the rise of drug cartels and the violent conflict
throughout Mexico. The Committee will also examine the
Department's efforts to identify, detain, prioritize, and
remove criminal aliens from the United States, including those
apprehended at or near US borders and ports of entry who are
subject to deportation, particularly those from special
interest countries.

border screening and terrorist travel

In the 113th Congress, the Committee intends to review
efforts to ensure the deployment and implementation of training
and infrastructure enhancements to assist border and consular
officials in identifying, intercepting, and disrupting
terrorists or others who would do our Nation harm and who are
attempting to enter or travel within the United States. The
Committee will address security-related deficiencies in the
immigration and naturalization process that terrorists could
use to gain entry to or remain in the country for illegitimate
purposes. These weaknesses have and will continue to be
exploited by terrorists and those seeking to commit terrorist
acts. The Committee intends to continue to explore challenges
associated with visa security.
The Committee will also examine the integration, security,
and reliability of criminal, immigration, and terrorist
databases used to screen persons seeking to enter and exit this
country, to include advanced passenger information and the
United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology
(US-VISIT) program. The Committee will also assess the
development of secure travel documents. In addition, the
Committee will examine the integration and effectiveness of
transportation and border security screening systems at ports
of entry for detecting high-risk passengers and cargo
transported within the United States and across our borders,
including efforts to better facilitate travel and trade such as
implementation of ``trusted traveler'' programs and the Beyond
the Border Agreement. The Committee will also examine the
Department's security efforts between ports of entry and the
extent to which it collaborates with other federal, state, and
local agencies regarding border security.

port and maritime security

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine various
aspects of port and maritime security, including the security
of port facilities; the screening of vessels, passengers,
cargo, and crew for potential terrorists, terrorist weapons,
and contraband; nuclear detection efforts; the development of
international security standards for shipping and containers;
and the implementation and operation, including technology
utilized, of the Transportation Worker Identification
Credential. The Committee also plans to review how the
Department manages risk emerging from maritime threats and
vulnerabilities such as small boats and semi-submersible
submarines.
The Committee plans to review the efficiency and
effectiveness of the Department's supply chain security
programs, such as the Customs Trade Partnership Against
Terrorism (C-TPAT) and the Container Security Initiative (CSI),
to ensure a proper balance between the facilitation of lawful
trade and the security of the homeland. This will include an
assessment of implementation of the Maritime and Transportation
Security Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-295), the Security and
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-
347), relevant provisions of the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-458), and the
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007
(P.L. 110-53).

u.s. coast guard

During the 113th Congress, the Committee plans to review
the Coast Guard's homeland security missions, to include ports,
waterways, and coastal security; drug interdiction; migrant
interdiction; law enforcement; and defense readiness. The
Committee will examine Coast Guard afloat, aviation, and shore-
based operations in support of these missions to ensure that
the service is using a risk-based, layered strategy to enforce
laws and keep America's waters secure. This will include a
specific assessment of the Coast Guard's anti-terrorist
capabilities, most notably those found within the Deployable
Operations Group and its units, including Maritime Safety and
Security Teams, Port Security Units, Tactical Law Enforcement
Teams, and the Maritime Security Response Team.
The Committee will monitor the Coast Guard's efforts to
address threats from small vessels, issues from offshore oil
rigs, and essential vulnerable vessels such as tankers.
Additionally, the Committee will review resource and asset
needs within the Coast Guard to determine whether the service
is operationally ready to address threats and emergencies while
pursuing a long-term sustainable path of fleet
recapitalization. The Committee will specifically examine the
progress, efficiency, and efficacy of acquisitions programs to
ensure major procurements remain on schedule without a
reduction in readiness throughout the service.
Furthermore, the Committee will investigate the Coast
Guard's specific maritime security operations and initiatives,
such as the International Port Security Program and the
inspection of vessels originating from ports with inadequate
anti-terrorism measures. The Committee will examine these and
other programs to ensure that the service is developing a full
sense of maritime domain awareness and executing all of its
missions in the most effective manner possible to keep America
secure.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

aviation security

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the risks
to the aviation system, as well as the development and
implementation of security measures to reduce or mitigate such
risks. The Committee's oversight will review programs and
procedures implemented by the Department of Homeland Security
related to the security of all types of aircraft, including
commercial passenger, air cargo, and general aviation aircraft.
In addition, the Committee will examine airport perimeter and
access controls and technology for limiting access to the
secure areas of commercial and general aviation airports. The
Committee will also examine the training and management of the
Federal Air Marshal Service.
In addition, the Committee will examine the Department's
global strategy for securing the aviation system including its
cooperation with foreign countries on security procedures and
technologies and the harmonization of aviation security
standards worldwide. The Committee will identify international
best practices to aviation security that could result in
efficiencies in the United States. The Committee also remains
concerned about weaknesses in the Alien Flight Student program
and will continue to monitor the Department's progress in
correcting these weaknesses. The Committee will continue to
pursue options for strengthening the security process for US
citizens enrolled in flight training.

passenger and baggage screening

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review TSA's
deployment of technology and implementation of procedures
related to the screening of passengers in all modes of
transportation and will examine TSA's balancing security
interests with the need for the efficient flow of travel,
including privacy and civil liberties safeguards. The Committee
will conduct oversight on the cost and effectiveness of
technology related to the screening of baggage; transportation
security information sharing within the Federal interagency
process; and the effectiveness of the credentialing process.
The Committee will also review TSA's passenger search policies
and pre-screening programs, including the screening of
passengers against no-fly and selectee lists, the performance
of the Secure Flight program, and other measures that affect
the security of domestic and international air travelers.

reforming transportation security

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine
additional options for the Department to allow the private
sector more flexibility to innovate transportation security
including the Screening Partnership Program. The Committee will
explore the costs and benefits of these options. The Committee
will continue to examine the extent to which a risk-based
security approach can increase efficiencies in the TSA
workforce without compromising security. This examination will
include the effectiveness of the Department's outreach to the
public on its transportation security measures. The Committee
will also monitor the progress of the Department to implement
risk-based screening initiatives, such as TSA's Pre-Check
program, at airports nationwide to increase efficiencies in the
screening process. This includes assessing the effectiveness of
these initiatives.
The Committee will review the Department's acquisition and
procurement policies, practices, and procedures for screening
technologies to ensure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
The Committee will continue to seek input from independent
groups outside the Department to help ensure a leaner, smarter,
more efficient organization. In addition, the Committee will
monitor the extent to which the Department enlists the private
sector to modernize and, to the extent feasible, automate the
passenger screening process to reduce invasive pat-downs;
implements privacy software on all Advanced Imaging Technology
machines; sponsors an independent analysis of the potential
health impacts of AIT machines; and further validates the
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques program and
assesses the value added to aviation security.

surface transportation

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the
Transportation Security Administration's efforts to secure
surface transit systems, including the most at-risk mass
transit systems, buses, subway light rail, and passenger rail,
freight rail, pipelines, and highway systems. Moreover, in
examining the security of surface transportation systems, the
Committee will consider options to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of the surface transportation inspection program.
The Committee will also examine the efficacy and impact of
Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response teams. The Committee
will also monitor the extent to which the Department
effectively coordinates with other Federal partners, such as
the Department of Transportation, the Federal Rail
Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration to
secure our nation's transportation systems. The Committee will
continue to monitor the implementation of the Transportation
Worker Identification Credential and its impact on those
required to obtain the credential.

transportation security regulations

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine
transportation security regulations in order to reduce the
burden on the economy and improve American global
competitiveness. The Committee will examine the challenges to
finalize guidance related to foreign-aircraft repair-station
security. The Committee will continue to seek perspectives from
the private sector on the impact of transportation security
regulations and options for the Department to become more
efficient and effective.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

preparedness and response

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Administration's efforts to implement Presidential Policy
Directive 8 (PPD-8), and the required National Preparedness
System, which includes the various frameworks and the National
Preparedness Goal. Additionally, the Committee will review the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) response and
recovery efforts for declared disasters to ensure capabilities
are enhanced by lessons learned and Federal resources are used
appropriately. The Committee will investigate issues, if any,
of waste, fraud, and abuse associated with FEMA's disaster
response efforts.

assistance to state and local governments and first responders

Throughout the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine
FEMA's allocation and administration of grants to enhance the
ability of state and local governments and emergency response
providers to prevent, prepare for, respond to, mitigate, and
recover from a terrorist attack, including proposals for
reforms to these programs. The Committee will review the
coordination of grant programs across the Federal government;
coordination within the Department of Homeland Security in
developing guidance and administering grants; the ability of
state and local governments to access, obligate, and expend
funds; strength of regional partnerships developed through
grants; and the risk-based distribution and expenditure of such
grants at the state and local levels. The Committee will
examine options to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of
grant programs. The Committee will also review ongoing efforts
to comprehensively assess these investments and the impact on
preparedness capabilities through the lens of the National
Preparedness Goal, National Preparedness Report, State
Preparedness Reports, and other related measures.

chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear planning, preparedness,
and response

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
significant challenges posed by chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons to homeland security
and assess the Department's progress in implementing security
strategies including prevention, preparedness, and response
approaches that utilize multiple tools and policies to reduce
the likelihood and impact of CBRN attacks and, thus, the CBRN
risk to the Nation. The Committee will oversee the Department's
efforts to predict and respond to the evolving CBRN threat
landscape, and ensure that CBRN expenditures are risk-based,
coordinated, and in general represent wise use of taxpayer
dollars. The Committee will examine the Department's capability
to mitigate CBRN risks through appropriate means including
detection of, preparedness for, and response to CBRN threats.
The Committee will continue its oversight of those activities
needed to ensure the safety of the public and the first
responder community in the event of an attack, such as through
the development of medical countermeasures programs. The
Committee will also oversee preparedness for agricultural
terrorism events.

communications

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
coordination of the various communications programs and offices
within the Department of Homeland Security. The Committee will
monitor activities of the First Responder Network Authority
(FirstNet) and the development of the public safety
interoperable wireless broadband network. In addition, the
Committee will review the Department's programs in the
establishment of the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System
to ensure timely and effective alerts and warnings are provided
to the public in the event of an emergency.

emergency response provider training

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the
Department's terrorism preparedness training programs,
including awareness of these resources among first responders
and state and local governments and the level of coordination
among Federal, state, and local training programs. The
Committee will also review existing training centers and
determine whether the Department is optimally utilizing these
facilities to enhance first responder terrorism preparedness.

exercises and simulations

The Committee will examine the Department's efforts to
streamline and improve the National Exercise Program to ensure
the program enhances the preparedness of the Nation. The
Committee will monitor the extent to which FEMA is
incorporating lessons learned from national exercises into
future training, planning, and response, recovery, and
mitigation activities.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

cybersecurity

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Department's role in hardening our national critical
infrastructure against cyber attacks by fortifying Federal
civilian networks and collaborating with the private sector to
develop the means to detect and prevent cyber attacks, reduce
vulnerabilities, provide incident response, and facilitate
recovery. That oversight will consider the Department's ability
to detect the incursion of malicious activity; attribute the
source of that activity; and promote best practices, risk
assessments, and sharing of threat information across all
levels of government and the private sector.
The Department has been delegated authority by the White
House to develop cybersecurity policy across the civilian
government agencies. The Committee will monitor that this
policy is effective, efficient and scalable to ensure the
security of government networks. In addition, the Committee
will examine the Department's ability to foster research and
development cybersecurity technology as well as developing a
substantial and capable professional cybersecurity workforce.
The Department has recently reorganized the offices tasked with
carrying out its cybersecurity mission so the Committee will
review the efficiencies in these offices to make sure that the
bureaucracy enables, and doesn't hinder, the mission. The
Committee will also examine the resiliency of national critical
infrastructure to withstand cyber attacks and the need to
optimize supply chain risk management in order to protect
against manipulation without unnecessarily impeding commerce.
The Committee will also review the integration of the
various cyber missions carried out across the Federal
government, including its collaboration with the defense and
intelligence agencies. Similarly the Committee will monitor the
Department's role in fulfilling the goals of the Homeland
Security blueprint for cybersecurity, as well as the
development and the implementation of the National Cyber
Incident Response Plan, which expands upon the National
Response Framework. The Committee will ensure that the
Department facilitates the improved security of our Nation's
critical infrastructure while earning and building on the trust
of the owners and operators of that infrastructure.

critical infrastructure protection

Pursuant to Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7
(HSPD-7), the Department is responsible for integrating sector
specific strategies into a National Strategy for Critical
Infrastructure Protection, and for coordinating Federal efforts
across all such infrastructure sectors. During the 113th
Congress, Committee oversight will focus on the Department's
national coordination responsibilities and its sector specific
critical infrastructure protection responsibilities. The
Committee will also examine the Department's efforts to assess
national critical infrastructure priorities.
In addition, the Committee will review the Department's
progress in identifying, prioritizing, recommending, and
implementing protective measures to reduce vulnerabilities for
critical infrastructure and key resources, including its
administration of programs to promote private sector sharing of
critical infrastructure threat and vulnerability-related
information, and its administration of systems and programs to
provide timely warnings of potential risks to critical
infrastructure.

chemical facility security

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue to
review the Department's efforts to secure chemical facilities
and take action, as appropriate, to optimally balance the
program's effectiveness in reducing risk posed by certain
chemical facilities and the everyday demands for chemicals in
commerce. The Committee will review the management challenges
associated with the Department's related chemical facility
security program and the progress in increasing its efficiency
and effectiveness.

science and technology

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will oversee the
capability of the Department's Science & Technology Directorate
to rapidly develop and deliver products and technology
solutions to its customers, including the operating components
of the Department, and state and local emergency responders and
officials, to help them secure the homeland by preventing,
protecting against, and responding to terrorist threats and
natural disasters. The Committee will examine, in particular,
the Department's progress in developing a more rigorous process
to identify, prioritize, and fund research, development,
testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) opportunities that balances
risk to the homeland with cost, impact, and time to deliver.
The Committee will review the Department's efforts to
coordinate the homeland security research and development
agenda and leverage scientific knowledge and technical
expertise, research, and facilities at relevant universities,
research institutions, government and national laboratories,
and the private sector, including the Homeland Security Centers
of Excellence and Federally Funded Research and Development
Centers. The Committee will also assess the status of the
Department's technical infrastructure and workforce to ensure
current and future homeland security RDT&E needs will be met.
The Committee will review the Department's activities relating
to evaluation, testing, and certification of private sector
homeland security technologies.
During the 113th Congress, the Committee will also continue
to review the Directorate's implementation of the Support Anti-
terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act (the SAFETY
Act), to determine its impact on homeland security and
facilitation of jobs in the private sector.

technology to counter chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
threats

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Department's progress in improving the Nation's capability to
counter the threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear weapons in the United States through
multi-layered approaches at the Federal, state, and local
levels. The Committee will review the Department's chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear analysis capabilities and
information sharing mechanisms to provide actionable
information and an integrated operating system to guide
decision makers in carrying out appropriate responses,
including interdiction.
To enhance the ability to interdict chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear smuggling across US borders (land,
air, and sea), the Committee will oversee the Department's
progress in employing risk-based methods for developing,
testing, certifying, deploying, and operating current and next
generation chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
detection equipment. The Committee will also examine the
Department's ability to detect chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear materials in the interior of the
United States and the Department's coordination with state and
local partners to reduce the risk of these threats. Finally,
the Committee will examine the Department's chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear forensic activities to
support national priorities for deterrence, attribution, and
prosecution.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

departmental efficiency and waste, fraud, abuse, and duplication

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will oversee the
Department of Homeland Security's day-to-day operations to
ensure that it is operating in the most efficient and effective
manner possible. Pursuant to Rule X, clause 2(d)(F) of the
Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee will work
to identify potential opportunities to eliminate duplicative or
unnecessary programs, find efficiencies that will contribute to
the Department's ability to meet its vital missions, and
identify areas for cost savings. The Committee will also
conduct rigorous oversight to ensure departmental regulations
enhance security without posing an unnecessary barrier to
private sector job creation. The Committee will investigate
homeland security programs and practices, as warranted. For
example, the Committee will continue to monitor the safety and
security of Federal buildings and facilities, including the
role and effectiveness of the Federal Protective Service. The
Committee's oversight will include monitoring the extent to
which the Department is responsive to the Committee's requests.

acquisition management

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the
efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to improve
acquisition outcomes, and to ensure that effective management
controls are put in place to prevent contract waste, fraud, and
abuse while promoting efficiency and effectiveness. The
Committee will review the authorities and activities of the
Undersecretary for Management and Chief Procurement Officer to
ensure the effective management of these key functions. The
Committee will monitor the cost, schedule, and performance
status of major Department acquisition programs. The Committee
will also examine the impact of the Department's acquisition
initiatives to enhance processes and improve outcomes related
to its major acquisition programs.
The Committee also will review the Department's
implementation of Section 831(a) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002, which grants the Secretary authority with respect to
research and development projects to use more flexible
contracting mechanisms in an effort to attract ``nontraditional
government contractors'' for needed homeland security
technologies, as well as the Secretary's use of other
streamlined acquisition practices. The Committee will continue
to monitor the Department's efforts to leverage strategic
sourcing, as outlined in Federal guidance, to increase
efficiencies.

financial management

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will continue its
oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's progress to
properly manage financial systems and data to minimize
inefficient and wasteful spending, make more informed decisions
to manage its programs and implement Department policies. The
Committee will also review the Department's efforts to enhance
its managerial cost accounting, address internal control
weaknesses in financial reporting, achieve a clean audit
opinion on its financial statements, and reduce the reliance on
manual data calls to collect cost information from the various
components and compile consolidated, reliable data.

information technology management

During the 113th Congress, the Committee will review the
Department's efforts to address information technology (IT)
challenges, including the management and integration of the
Department's IT systems. The Committee will review the
authorities and activities of the Chief Information Officer
(CIO) and component CIOs to ensure the effective management and
coordination of these key functions. The Committee will also
monitor the Department's progress in IT architectural planning,
investment management, cloud computing, policy development,
operations, and related personnel management.

departmental workforce

Throughout the 113th Congress, the Committee will monitor
the Department's efforts to recruit and retain personnel and to
address employee concerns set forth in the Office of Personnel
Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the Department's
own personnel surveys, which have indicated morale problems
across the Department. In addition, the Committee will continue
to examine the Department's Balanced Workforce Initiative,
which seeks to convert contractor positions into Federal
positions, to ensure an appropriate balance is struck between
Federal employees and private contracts and guard against any
unnecessary elimination of private sector jobs.
The Committee will continue to monitor the Department's
efforts to effectively and efficiently consolidate its
headquarters from more than 40 locations throughout the
National Capital Region, known as the St. Elizabeth's
Headquarters Consolidation Project.

employee integrity

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine employee
corruption and misconduct issues and their effect on homeland
security. Although the vast majority of Department employees
reflect the agency's core values, even one corrupt employee
represents a significant management challenge. The Committee
will review Department statistics and case studies associated
with employee integrity issues, as well as, the effectiveness
of policies, procedures, and practices the Department utilizes
to address such issues.

united states secret service

In the 113th Congress, the Committee will examine the
homeland security operations of the United States Secret
Service, including its critical role of protecting the
President of the United States, among other duties. The
Committee will also monitor issues related to employee
integrity.

privacy and civil liberties

Section 222 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (the Act)
created a Privacy Officer for the Department of Homeland
Security to ensure that the Department's information gathering
and analysis functions and other programs across its components
adhere to established standards for the protection of privacy.
Section 705 of the Act also established an Officer for Civil
Rights and Liberties to review and assess information alleging
abuses of civil rights or civil liberties by employees and
officials of the Department of Homeland Security. During the
113th Congress, the Committee will continue to monitor the
Department's efforts under such laws to strike an appropriate
balance between the need to combat terrorist attacks against
the United States with the privacy expectations and civil
rights of US citizens. For example, the Committee will continue
to monitor the Department's role in oversight of the domestic
use of unmanned aerial systems.
PART B--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY OVERSIGHT
PLAN FOR THE 113TH CONGRESS

Part B of this section contains a summary of the actions
taken by the Committee on Homeland Security to implement the
Oversight Plan for the 113th Congress and the recommendations
made with respect to this plan. Part B also contains a summary
of the additional oversight activities undertaken by the
Committee, and the recommendations made or actions taken
thereon.

PREVENTING A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE HOMELAND

During the first session of the 113th Congress, the
Committee continued its focus on the security of the United
States Homeland. On April 15, the landscape of American
security was greatly impacted when two American persons who
used improvised explosive devices (IED), killed three people
and injured approximately 260 others at the finish line of the
Boston Marathon. Since this attack, the Committee has been
working on a report on the events that led to the attack as
well as recommendations for how the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) and other U.S. Governmental agencies can make
adjustments to their operating procedures to reduce the
likelihood this atrocity could be repeated. The Committee held
two hearings on the Boston Marathon Bombing, one on May 23 and
the other on July 10, sent Committee staff to Moscow, Russia,
and twice to Boston, Massachusetts to obtain additional details
on the bombing and the suspects. The Committee expects a
report, one classified and one open version to be released in
early 2014.
This major national security event continued to drive the
Committee to conduct preemptive oversight of other major
Homeland security events and issues. In August 2013, the
Committee conducted oversight after al-Qaeda-linked threat to
United States' interests throughout the Middle East and North
Africa. During this threat, Committee staff met with Government
officials and private sector experts on al-Qaeda's growing
spider web of affiliates and the threat they pose to the
Homeland. This continued into September when the Committee,
raised awareness of the growing level of al-Qaeda and Islamist
extremists in the Syrian conflict. The Committee conducted a
hearing on the subject entitled ``Crisis in Syria: Implications
on the Homeland'' on September 10, 2013. This hearing affected
the national debate of the Syrian conflict and its impact on
homeland security.
During the Committee's investigation into the Syrian
conflict, the Committee became increasing concerned, as Syria
was the world's third largest holder of chemical weapons. As
parts of Syria fell to the opposition, the Committee, working
with DHS and intelligence organizations, as well as private
companies, raised the National debate on the affects of
chemical weapons falling into the growing hands of Islamist
extremists. The Committee held classified meetings with DHS,
FBI, and Intelligence Community members to discuss this issue
and raise awareness. The Committee held meetings and attended
meetings with government officials from intelligence
organizations from August to November 20, 2013 on issues
related to Syria that have the potential to affect the
Homeland. The Committee is continuing to monitor the impact
from this crisis.
International tragedy continued in September when al-
Shabaab, a Somali based al-Qaeda linked terrorist organization
attacked a mall in Kenya. The soft target or Mumbai-style
attack was quickly recognized by the Committee as having
implications on the Homeland and a hearing was held on October
9, entitled ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How Westerners
Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the Homeland.'' Experts
from private industry attended speaking of the threat to the
Homeland and Sheriff Stanek from Minneapolis area of Minnesota
spoke as a senior law enforcement official dealing with
citizens who have participated in al-Shabaab.
The Committee continued to investigate and push the
Administration on the Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO)
designation for Western Africa (Nigeria) terrorist group, Boko
Haram. The Committee issued letters to the Secretary of State
on 13 and 30 September urging the Department to rethink its
stance on the terrorist organization and issued an update to
the Committee's report from the 112th Congress on Boko Haram.
On November 13 2013, the Department of State issued the FTO
designation making it more difficult for Boko Haram to obtain
support. The Committee, during the 113th Congress, will
continue to move the Administration to isolate terrorist
organizations such as al-Shabaab and Boko Haram, in order to
better safeguard the homeland.
Designating these groups as FTOs provides the Federal
Government with additional tools to fight terrorism and to
protect the Homeland, something this Committee has continued to
do in the First Session of this Congress. Ensuring information
sharing from the highest levels to the lowest has been a
priority, and another key to preventing attacks on the
Homeland. On July 26, 2013, the Committee issued its year long
investigative report on the National Network of Fusion Centers,
the hub of information sharing for State and Local law
enforcement and emergency management. The Committee's
evaluation found that while the Network of fusion centers is a
vital part of our Nation's counterterrorism efforts, it is not
currently functioning at its full potential. The Committee will
continue to monitor the progress of the Fusion Centers to
ensure that they continue to improve and add to the national
collection, analysis and sharing of critical information that
will protect the Homeland.
In the beginning of 2014, the Olympic Games will be held in
Sochi, Russia, close to the Caucus region. The Caucuses have
been a hot bed of extremism, and have connections to conflict
zones throughout the world, as well as the suspects believed
responsible for the Boson Marathon bombing. In November 2013
sent staff members to Sochi, as well as neighboring Georgia, to
further investigate the region and the Islamist extremists
there. The Committee released a report in late November
detailing the unclassified portion of the trip and plans to
continue monitoring these groups as well as the threat they
pose to the nearly 15,000 American athletes and attendees at
the Olympic Games.

securing our borders

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Committee examined the Department's efforts to secure the
Nation's land and maritime borders. As result of this
oversight, the Committee unanimously approved legislation that
would require the Department to develop a comprehensive border
security strategy to gain and maintain situational awareness
and operational control of the border. The legislation requires
tangible metrics for the apprehension of illegal border
crossings and a significant reduction in the movement of
illegal drugs and contraband.
From August 3 through 6, 2013, the Committee conducted a
site visit to the southwest border. The purpose of the site
visit was to examine current border security conditions,
including the maritime environment. Members experienced
witnessed border security operations in the maritime domain,
urban environment, border security infrastructure, Unmanned
Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operations, and border security challenges
in the Rio Grande Valley. In San Diego, Members examined United
States Coast Guard port security operations, conducted an
aerial tour of the international border, and examined tactical
infrastructure and counter tunneling operations. In Tucson,
Arizona Members toured various facilities including: the Tucson
Joint Field Command and Predator Operations Center; a
demonstration of advanced Integrated Fixed Tower technologies,
in Sasabe; and received an overview of UAV operations at Fort
Huachuca. Members then traveled to the Rio Grande Valley to
participate in border terrain tours with local law enforcement,
receive briefings on the South Texas Campaign, and the Texas
National Guard on RC-26 fixed-wing aerial detection and
monitoring operations supporting the Department of Homeland
Security.
Throughout the First Session, the Committee has actively
examined the key elements of border security including the
definition of a secure border, border security metrics and
measures, visa security and overstays, the implementation of a
biometric exit system, cargo security, maritime security, and
the future of the Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC).
From August 3 through 6, 2013, the Committee conducted a
site visit to the Southwest border. The purpose of the site
visit was to examine current border security conditions,
including the maritime environment. Members witnessed border
security operations in the maritime domain, urban environment,
border security infrastructure, UAV operations, and border
security challenges in the Rio Grande Valley. In San Diego,
Members examined United States Coast Guard port security
operations, conducted an aerial tour of the international
border, and examined tactical infrastructure and counter
tunneling operations. In Tucson, Arizona Members toured various
facilities including: the Tucson Joint Field Command and
Predator Operations Center; a demonstration of advanced
Integrated Fixed Tower technologies, in Sasabe; and received an
overview of UAV operations at Fort Huachuca. Members then
traveled to the Rio Grande Valley to participate in border
terrain tours with local law enforcement, receive briefings on
the South Texas Campaign, and the Texas National Guard on
fixed-wing aerial detection and monitoring operations
supporting the Department of Homeland Security.
During the First Session, the Committee received updates on
the Arizona Technology Plan and successfully pushed for the
Department of Defense to re-deploy aerostats to DHS for
assessment in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. The Committee is
optimistic that Mexican government reforms will provide new
economic opportunities so that citizens will choose stable,
viable jobs, especially in the energy industry, instead of
joining criminal cartels. The Committee will continue to
recommend to the Department to secure our borders in the north,
south, and the maritime domain.

protecting against cyber attacks

During the first session of the 113th Congress, the
Committee met extensively with the Department and various
stakeholders to examine the Department's role in the hardening
our national critical infrastructure against cyber attacks by
fortifying Federal and civilian networks and collaborating with
the private sector to reduce vulnerabilities.
The National Infrastructure Protection Plan and Executive
Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
solidified the Department's role as the lead Federal entity in
protecting domestic critical infrastructure. The Committee held
numerous briefings to understand the role of the Department in
implementing the Executive Order. Upon issuance of Executive
Order 13636 and Presidential Policy Directive--21 on Critical
Infrastructure Security and Resilience, the Committee received
briefings from DHS to understand the role of the Department in
implementing these documents. On March 13, 2013, the Committee
held a hearing entitled ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical
Infrastructure.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon.
Jane Holl Lute, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. Anish B. Bhimani, Chairman, Financial Services
Information Sharing and Analysis Center; Mr. Gary W. Hayes,
Chief Information Officer, Centerpoint Energy; and Ms. Michelle
Richardson, Legislative Counsel, American Civil Liberties
Union.
As the Nation approached key Affordable Care Act milestones
during 2013, the Committee raised security and privacy concerns
prior to problems as healthcare.gov went live in October. The
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies held hearings in July and September on
healthcare.gov and the Health Exchange Data Hub. On November 8,
Committee staff also received a briefing from the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Office of
Cybersecurity and Communications on Department of Homeland
Security roles in the implementation of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act. On November 13, 2013, the Full
Committee held a hearing entitled ``Cyber Side-Effects: How
Secure is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed
Healthcare.gov?'' The Committee received testimony from Ms.
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Acting Assistant Secretary,
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Ms. Soraya Correa, Associate Director,
Enterprise Services Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Mr.
Luke Chung, President, FMS, Inc.; and Mr. Waylon Krush, Chief
Executive Officer, Lunarline, Inc. In preparation for this
hearing, Committee staff met with stakeholders to discuss
technical flaws with healthcare.gov.

managing dhs with a business-model approach

During the first session of the 113th Congress, the
Committee has been actively monitoring the Department of
Homeland Security's (DHS) management and operations to ensure
that it is functioning more efficiently and is accountable to
the American people. The Chairman and Ranking Member have
attended Subcommittee hearings on management issues. The
Committee met with DHS headquarters and many components to
examine management practices in acquisition, financial
management, information technology, human capital, and employee
integrity.
Integrated Investment Life Cycle Management (IILCM) is the
Department's transformational concept to integrate all phases
of the Department's multi-billion dollar budget and investment/
acquisition management process--more like a business would do.
The framework provides critical linkages between Strategy,
Capabilities and Requirements, Programming and Budgeting, and
Investment Oversight phases to ensure the effective execution
of federal funds to support strategic priorities. IILCM was
signed into policy by Secretary Napolitano in February 2013 and
the framework is being piloted through March 2014 using the
cybersecurity, biodefense, and common vetting portfolios. On
November 14, 2013, DHS officials briefed the Committee on their
approach to IILCM.
On August 1, 2013, the Undersecretary for Management, the
Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Information Officer, and other
senior officials briefed Committee staff on the status of the
Department's acquisition management efforts. As a follow up, on
September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Management Efficiency held a hearing entitled ``DHS Acquisition
Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and
Private Sector Lessons Learned.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. Rafael Borras, Undersecretary for
Management, Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Michele
Mackin, Director, Government Accountability Office; Ms. Anne
Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, Office of
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. William
C. Greenwalt, Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute;
Mr. Stan Soloway, President and CEO, Professional Services
Council; Mr. David Berteau, Senior Vice President, Center for
Strategic and International Studies. The purpose of the hearing
was to examine DHS's acquisition practices to determine if the
Department is effectively implementing its policies and to
assess whether DHS could leverage best practices and lessons
learned from the Defense Department and the private sector.
In light of the Government Accountability Office's (GAO)
2013 High-Risk report which identified financial management
within the Department as high risk, on February 20, 2013, the
Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight
and Management Efficiency, and the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies, sent a letter to DHS's Chief Financial Officer
regarding the Department's financial management systems and
efforts to obtain a clean audit opinion on its financial
statements. The Department provided a response to this letter
on March 8, 2013. On March 11, 2013, Committee staff received a
briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer. The GAO issued its
report DHS Financial Management: Additional Efforts Needed to
Resolve Deficiencies in Internal Controls and Financial
Management Systems on September 30, 2013, [GAO-13-561]. The
report contained four recommendations for executive action. On
July 8, 2013, Committee staff received a briefing from DHS's
Chief Financial Officer regarding DHS's efforts to modernize
its financial systems. To further examine these issues, on
November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiency held a hearing entitled ``DHS Financial Management:
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Asif Khan, Director,
Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. Government
Accountability Office; and Ms. Anne Richards, Assistant
Inspector General for Audits, Office of Inspector General, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of the hearing was
to examine relevant GAO and Inspector General findings on DHS
financial practices, including steps to obtain a clean audit
opinion and implement financial management systems.
The Committee reviewed the authorities and activities of
the Chief Information Officer (CIO) to ensure the effective
management and coordination of key IT systems planning,
investment management, cloud computing, data consolidating,
operations, policy development, and related personnel
management. The Committee also examined component CIOs--
particularly Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and United States
Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS)--and their efforts to
modernize and implement critical IT systems supporting our
border agents and immigration officers. On February 21, 2013,
Committee staff received a briefing from DHS Office of
Inspector General concerning their ongoing IT Audits and IT
management issues. Committee staff also received briefings from
representatives from DHS, including: The DHS Chief Information
Officer; USCIS, including the USCIS Chief Information Officer;
CBP; and ICE, including the ICE Chief Information Officer. The
Committee reviewed the Department's efforts to address
information technology (IT) challenges, including the
management and integration of the Department's IT systems. The
Committee monitored the Department's progress in IT
architectural planning, investment management, and cloud
computing. On March 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``DHS Information Technology: How Effectively Has DHS
Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and Uphold Immigration
Laws?'' The purpose of the hearing was to assess how IT
resources are being effectively utilized to help secure our
borders and uphold immigration laws and how the Department is
exercising proper management and oversight of its IT
investments. The Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee on Oversight & Management Efficiency additionally
requested on May 23, 2013, to sign onto an ongoing GAO review
of the TECS modernization program--the Treasury Enforcement
Communication System. Committee staff also received a briefing
from the Office of Inspector General regarding its
investigation related to the DHS Chief Information Officer.
The Committee has been vocal about the need for key
Department leadership positions to be filled as vacancies lead
to ineffective government. On March 5, 2013, the Chairman and
Ranking Member sent a letter the President urging him to
swiftly appoint an Inspector General at DHS.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

counterterrorism

During the first session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence examined the
counterterrorism efforts of the U.S. Government across the
government to counter the threat from al-Qaeda and other terror
networks with a focus on the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The Committee conducted a series of meetings, briefings,
and site visit from DHS and component agencies, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National Counterterrorism
Center (NCTC), and the Department of State (DOS).
Subcommittee Members and staff received classified briefing
from the above agencies, as well as others, on the threat posed
by al-Qaeda core and affiliates, as well as the emerging al-
Qaeda threats in Syria, North Africa, and the Sinai. The
Subcommittee held oversight hearings on the threat to the
Homeland from Syria and Iran, al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula, and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
The Subcommittee conducted oversight over the Foreign
Terrorist Organization (FTO) designation process. While DOS
handles this process, the designation of entities as FTOs has a
direct impact on homeland security. The Chairs of the Full
Committee and Subcommittee, along with the Chair of the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies, sent a letter to DOS and issued a report
urging a FTO designation for Boko Haram.

counterintelligence

The Subcommittee conducted oversight over the programs
within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) focused on
detecting insider threats, including counterintelligence,
polygraph, and security clearance programs. The Subcommittee
staff met with representatives from the Defense Security
Service within the Department of Defense, the DHS Office of
Security, the Customs and Border Protection Internal Affairs
Office, the Intelligence and Analysis Counterintelligence
Program, and the Government Accountability Office. The
Subcommittee held a hearing on insider threats and the security
clearance process.

unconventional and emerging threats

The Subcommittee held a hearing on U.S. counterterrorism
efforts to combat a chemical, biological, radiological, and
nuclear (CBRN) attack. Additionally, Subcommittee staff
received classified and unclassified briefings on CBRN threats
from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Bureau
of Investigations, Sandia National Laboratory, and outside
entities.

homeland security intelligence enterprise

The Subcommittee has had multiple classified and
unclassified briefings with officials from the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis
(I&A) to examine the structure, mission, and capability of the
office, as well as I&As role in coordinating intelligence
within DHS and State and local law enforcement. Subcommittee
staff also met with Customs and Border Protection, Immigrations
and Customs Enforcement, the National Counterterrorism Center,
the Government Accountability Office, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigations regarding the network of Joint Terrorism Task
Forces.

information sharing

Subcommittee Members received classified and unclassified
briefings on DHS intelligence and information sharing efforts.
Members received additional briefings on the mission and
capabilities of the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
Subcommittee Members and staff received threat briefings from
the Department of Homeland Security and reviewed new
intelligence products and information sharing efforts. In
addition, Subcommittee staff met with representatives from the
National Fusion Center Association, Government Accountability
Office, and multiple State and local law enforcement
jurisdictions regarding the quality, quantity, and timeliness
of information shared between Federal, State, and local law
enforcement.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the
Subcommittee released a Majority Staff Report entitled ``The
National Network of Fusion Centers,'' detailing the Committee's
findings and recommendations developed from a comprehensive
study of fusions centers across the country.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

border security

During the First Session of 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security examined the
Department of Homeland Security's efforts to secure the borders
of the United States at and between the ports of entry, as well
as in the maritime domain. The Subcommittee held hearings on
these border security related topics on February 26, 2013,
March 20, 2013, and July 23, 2013. The Subcommittee also
considered H.R. 1417. The Chair and Ranking member of the
Subcommittee sent letters to the Secretary regarding the
continuance of the Tethered Aerostat Radar System.
In 2013 the Subcommittee held several oversight hearings
regarding border security which dressed personnel, technology,
infrastructure, coordination and assessed the status of
programs and agreements to secure U.S. international borders
from illegal entry by persons or contraband. The first hearing
was held on February 26, 2013, and was entitled ``What Does a
Secure Border Look Like?'' The hearing took a holistic look at
the border and called upon the Department to define what a
secure border looks like, assess what needs are to achieve a
secure border and how to measure border security progress.
The Subcommittee reviewed the available technologies used
to secure the borders by hosting a briefing from Department of
Homeland Security Officials on the state of border security on
March 13, 2013. The purpose of this briefing was to better
understand the current state of border security efforts from
all the Department of Homeland Security components with a role
in border security and to identify the need for a national
strategy to secure the border.
The second hearing the Subcommittee held further explored
the technologies currently employed and the future recourse
plans of the Department. This hearing was held on June 23,
2013, and was entitled ``A Study in Contrasts: House and Senate
Approaches to Border Security.'' The purpose of this hearing
was to assess the disparate border security approaches of the
House and Senate, and to better inform the legislation that is
presented to the Congress which will finally seek to achieve
the outcome of a secure border.
The Department has struggled to convey metrics that measure
performance in securing the borders and reflect the state of
border security. On March 20, 2013, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand the State
of Border Security.'' The purpose of this hearing was to
examine the status of the Border Condition Index (BCI), and
further examine outcome-based ways to measure the state of
border security.
The Subcommittee considered legislation to require a
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain situational
awareness and operational control of the border, and sets the
time requirements to achieve operational control. H.R. 1417,
the Border Security Results Act of 2013, was introduced on
April 9, 2013; considered by the Subcommittee on April 24,
2013. The Full Committee considered the measure on May 15,
2013, and reported H.R. 1417 to the House on May 20, 2013.
In the Second Session the Subcommittee will be further
examining the threat of spill-over violence stemming from the
rise of drug cartels and the violent conflict throughout
Mexico. The Subcommittee will also examine the Department's
efforts to identify, detain, prioritize, and remove criminal
aliens from the United States, including those apprehended at
or near U.S. borders and ports of entry who are subject to
deportation, particularly those from special interest
countries.

border screening and terrorist travel

In the first session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee reviewed efforts to ensure the deployment and
implementation of training and infrastructure enhancements to
identify, intercept, and disrupt terrorists or others who would
do our Nation harm and who are within the United States.
The Subcommittee held hearings on these border screening
and terrorist travel related topics on May 21, 2013, and
September 26, 2013. The Chair of the Full Committee and Chair
of the Subcommittee sent a letters to: The Secretary of
Homeland Security regarding the expansion of the Global Entry
trusted traveler program to the Republic of Saudi Arabia; The
Secretary of Homeland Security regarding Customs and Border
Protection pre clearance operations to the United Arab Emirates
Abu Dhabi International Airport; The Director of Immigrations
and Customs Enforcement and the Deputy Commissioner of Customs
and Border Protection regarding the Student and Exchange
Visitor Information System (SEVIS) in the aftermath of the
Boston Marathon Bombing; The Director of Immigrations and
Customs Enforcement regarding the release of detainees.
As part of their efforts to address border screening and
terrorist travel the Subcommittee held several oversight
hearings. The Subcommittee explored the security-related
deficiencies of the visa security program that terrorists could
use to gain entry to or remain in the country for illegitimate
purposes. The first hearing which addressed this issue was held
on May 21, 2013, entitled ``Visa Security and Overstays: How
Secure is America?'' The purpose of this hearing was to examine
the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to secure
the border by addressing challenges in identifying individuals
who overstay their visas and explore ways to be more effective.
The second hearing the subcommittee closely examined the
integration, security, and reliability of criminal,
immigration, and terrorist databases used to screen persons
seeking to enter and exit this country. The subcommittee
closely assessed the development of the Department's
comprehensive biometric exit system. On September 26, 2013, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11
Commission Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.'' The
purpose of this hearing was to engage with Department of
Homeland Security Leadership on the current state of biometric
exit and to chart a path forward to implement a biometric
system at the nation's ports of entry/exit that is both a
counterterrorism and border security tool.
On March 13, 2013 the Subcommittee received a briefing from
Department of Homeland Security Officials on the state of
border security which examined the collaborative security
efforts between ports of entry with other federal, state, and
local agencies. This briefing was held to better understand the
current state of border security efforts including the
integration and effectiveness of transportation and border
security screening systems at ports of entry for detecting
high-risk passengers and cargo transported across our borders,
including efforts to better facilitate travel and trade such as
implementation of ``trusted traveler'' programs.

port and maritime security

In the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee has examined various aspects of port and maritime
security, including the security of port facilities and the
implementation and operation, including technology utilized, of
the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC). The
Subcommittee held hearing on these port and maritime security
related topics on June 18, 2013 and November 19, 2013.
The subcommittee held its first maritime focused hearing
on June 18, 2013, entitled ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability:
The Future of the TWIC Program.'' The purpose of this hearing
was to reexamine the security value of the TWIC card and
determine the future of the program.
The Subcommittee held a second maritime related hearing to
review how the Department manages risk emerging from maritime
threats and vulnerabilities such as drug and undocumented
migrant smuggling via small boats and semi-submersible
submarines. On November 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``What Does a Secure Maritime Border Look
Like?'' The purpose of this hearing was to examine what DHS
maritime components are doing to interdict maritime threats
before they arrive on shore or in U.S. ports, what is being
done to increase the Nation's understanding of illicit networks
that move in the maritime domain, and examine the Department's
layered approach to secure the maritime environment, and how
progress is being measured.
In the Second Session of the 113th Congress the
Subcommittee will be further examining the efficiency and
effectiveness of the Department's supply chain security
programs, such as the Customs Trade Partnership Against
Terrorism (C-TPAT) and the Container Security Initiative (CSI),
to ensure a proper balance between the facilitation of lawful
trade and the security of the homeland. This will include an
assessment of implementation of the Maritime and Transportation
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-295), the Security and
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-
347), relevant provisions of the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-458), and the
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of
2007(Pub. L. 110-53). Furthermore, the Subcommittee plans to be
more robust in the review of the Department's efforts in the
screening of vessels, passengers, cargo, and crew or potential
terrorists, terrorist weapons, and contraband; nuclear
detection efforts; the development of international security
standards for shipping and containers.

u.s. coast guard

During the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee reviewed the Coast Guard's homeland security
missions, which included the ports, waterways, and coastal
security; drug interdiction; migrant interdiction; and law
enforcement missions. The Subcommittee held hearings U.S. Coast
Guard related topics on November 19, 2013.
The Subcommittee held a hearing focusing on the Coast Guard
and the other maritime Components of the Department in the
collaborative effort to secure the border. On November 19,
2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``What Does a
Secure Maritime Border Look Like?'' The purpose of this hearing
was to understand what is being done to increase maritime
domain awareness and interdict maritime threats before they
arrive on shore or in U.S. ports. It examined the illicit
networks that move in the maritime domain, and examined the
Department's layered approach to secure the maritime
environment, and how progress is being measured.
In the Second Session of the 113th Congress the
Subcommittee will be further examining Coast Guard related
topics. The Subcommittee will investigate the Coast Guard's
specific maritime security operations and initiatives, such as
the International Port Security Program and the inspection of
vessels originating from ports with inadequate anti-terrorism
measures. The Subcommittee plans to assess the Coast Guard's
anti-terrorist capabilities, most notably the Deployable
Specialized Forces, including Maritime Safety and Security
Teams, Port Security Units, Tactical Law Enforcement Teams, and
the Maritime Security Response Team. Additionally, the
Subcommittee will review Coast Guard resources needed to ensure
the service is operationally ready to address threats and
emergencies while pursuing a long-term sustainable path of
fleet recapitalization. The Committee will specifically examine
the progress, efficiency, and efficacy of acquisitions programs
to ensure major procurements remain on schedule without a
reduction in readiness throughout the service.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

aviation security

Pursuant to the Committee Oversight Plan, the Subcommittee
examined risks to the aviation system, as well as the
development and implementation of security measures to reduce
and mitigate such risks through a series of classified and
unclassified briefings, hearings, general oversight, and
legislation. For example, Subcommittee Members received a
classified briefing on November 20, 2013, to discuss current
threats to the nation's aviation systems with the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Administrator. A
number of other briefings pertaining to aviation security
technologies, policies, and the Department of Homeland
Security's global strategy for securing the aviation system
were received on February 5, 2013, June 19, 2013, and June 27,
2013, respectively. The Subcommittee also conducted meetings
and held six hearings to receive testimony from TSA, the
Government Accountability Office (GAO), the DHS Inspector
General, and private sector stakeholders pertaining to TSA's
risk-based security initiatives, Federal Air Marshal Service
operations, and air cargo security.
In addition to these briefings and hearings, Subcommittee
Members sent oversight letters to TSA and GAO regarding
aviation security risks. A letter was sent on March 7, 2013, by
the Chair of the Subcommittee to the Comptroller General of the
United States requesting to be a co-requester of the GAO's
review of TSA's Secure Flight program, which is expected to be
completed in FY 2014. The Chair and Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee also sent a letter to the TSA Administrator on
October 18, 2013, seeking additional information and
clarification on TSA's decision to shift the responsibility of
monitoring exit lanes to airport operators.
Finally, Subcommittee Members and Staff developed and
refined legislation to improve TSA's ability to protect the
Nation's aviation systems. H.R. 2719, the Transportation
Security Acquisition Reform Act, would help improve security
technology planning and, ultimately, performance in the field.
H.R. 1204, the Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act,
would ensure that industry stakeholders continue to have a
voice in TSA policy decisions through the existing Aviation
Security Advisory Committee. With passage of this legislation,
TSA would not be able to allow the Committee's charter to
expire, which has happened in the past and has prevented the
private sector from having a formal body to engage the agency
and make recommendations.

passenger and baggage screening

Committee staff visited the Transportation Security
Administration Systems Integration Facility on August 28, 2013,
to observe current and future security screening technology
research and testing.
Pursuant to House Rule X, clauses 2(n) and (p), on November
14, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing to examine TSA's
Screening Passengers by Observable Techniques (SPOT) Program.
This hearing looked into the cost effectiveness and overall
security effectiveness of the SPOT program, based on a report
from the Government Accountability Office.
On November 6, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee visited
the campus of Duke University to observe research being done to
advance current and future passenger screening technology.
While in the area, staff also toured Raleigh Durham
International Airport to observe security operations at the
airport's security check point.

reforming transportation security

The House passed H.R. 2719, the Transportation Security
Acquisition Reform Act, introduces greater transparency and
accountability for TSA spending decisions through a series of
commonsense reforms. Specifically, it requires TSA to develop
and share with the public, for the first time, a strategic,
multiyear technology investment plan; share key information
with Congress on technology acquisitions, including cost
overruns, delays, or technical failures within 30 days of
identifying the problem; establish principles for managing
equipment in inventory to eliminate expensive storage of
unusable or outdated technologies; and report on its goals for
contracting with small businesses.
H.R. 2719 is budget neutral, and simply requires TSA to do
a better job of not only managing its own resources, but also
leveraging resources outside of the Department of Homeland
Security.
Further, the House passed H.R. 1204. This bill authorizes
the Aviation Security Advisory Committee (ASAC) and requires
TSA to consult with the ASAC on aviation security matters,
including on the development and implementation of policies,
programs, rulemakings and security directives. In addition, the
bill requires the ASAC to submit recommendations to TSA.
Staff also continued to monitor the progress of the
Department to implement risk-based screening, such as the
expansion of TSA's Pre-Check program.

surface transportation

In keeping with the Oversight Plan's intent to review the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)'s efforts to
secure surface transit systems, the chairman of the Full
Committee, along with the chairmen of the Subcommittees on
Transportation Security; Counterterrorism and Intelligence; and
Emergency Preparedness Response and Communications sent a
letter to the TSA, DHS, and FBI on October 4, 2013, seeking
information on how state, local, and federal agencies
collaborate and share information on surface transportation
security matters.
Moreover, on September 12, 2013, Committee staff visited
Washington, D.C.'s Union Station to observe K9 explosives
detection teams, TSA surface passenger screening, and other
passenger rail security efforts.

transportation security regulations

Staff visited the Transportation Security Administration
Systems Integration Facility (TSIF) on August 28, 2013, to
observe current and future security screening technology
research and testing.
Pursuant to House Rule X, clauses 2(n) and (p), on November
14, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing to examine TSA's
Screening Passengers by Observable Techniques (SPOT) Program.
This hearing looked into the cost effectiveness and overall
security effectiveness of the SPOT program, based on a report
from the Government Accountability Office.
On November 6, 2013, Members of the Subcommittee visited
the campus of Duke University to observe research being done to
advance current and future passenger screening technology.
While in the area, staff also toured Raleigh Durham
International Airport to observe security operations at the
airport's security check point.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

preparedness and response

During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee conducted
oversight of efforts at the Federal, State, local, tribal, and
private sector levels to prepare for, respond to, and recover
from terrorist attacks and natural disasters. Through a series
of hearings, a field hearing, briefings, and site visits, the
Subcommittee worked to ensure that the whole community is
engaged in these efforts. The Subcommittee held hearings to
assess the state of preparedness through the lens of the
National Preparedness Report; assess preparedness for mass
casualty events; and examine cyber incident response
capabilities. Subcommittee Members visited the Federal
Emergency Management Agency's National Response Coordination
Center, the American Red Cross' Disaster Operations Center, and
the National Protection and Programs Directorate's National
Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center to observe
response capabilities and operations. The Subcommittee will
continue its oversight of these vital issues during the second
session of the 113th Congress.

assistance to state and local governments and first responders

The Department of Homeland Security has awarded nearly $40
billion to State and local governments and first responders
since the September 11th terrorist attacks. To ensure the
Department is allocating this funding based on risk and
effectively monitoring the use of funds, the Subcommittee held
a hearing and classified briefing. In addition, Committee staff
has held numerous briefings with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency representatives on the development of
performance metrics to measure the effectiveness of the grants
and programmatic and financial monitoring efforts. During the
second session of the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee will
continue its oversight of the grant funds, including the
Department's proposal to develop a new National Preparedness
Grant Program. The Subcommittee is disappointed that despite
repeated requests for additional information and legislative
language on this proposal, the Department has failed to provide
sufficient information.

chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear planning, preparedness,
and response

Preparedness for and response to chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear events has remained a focus for the
Subcommittee in the 113th Congress. The Subcommittee has
received numerous briefings on the Office of Health Affairs'
BioWatch, National Biosurveillance Integration Center, and
Chemical Defense Programs at both the classified and
unclassified levels. At the Subcommittee's request, the
Government Accountability Office is conducting a review of the
National Biosurveillance Integration Center to ensure it is
meeting its mission and effectively working with interagency
partners as intended in the Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act (Pub. L. 110-53). In furtherance of
oversight conducted in the 112th Congress, the Committee passed
legislation, H.R. 1791, that was referred to the Subcommittee,
permitting the use of grant funds for medical preparedness
activities, including the procurement of vital medical
countermeasures.

communications

In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee has continued its
oversight of communications issues with a visit to the
Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity and
Communications Integration Center, briefings on the Office of
Emergency Communications, the First Responder Network Authority
and the implementation of the Public Safety Broadband Network,
and the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System. A series of
hearings on the use of social media and new technology
considered new and innovative ways to communicate with the
public before, during, and after emergencies. The Subcommittee
is considering legislation to authorize the Integrated Public
Alert and Warning System and has encouraged the Office of
Emergency Communications to update the National Emergency
Communications Plan. The Subcommittee will continue its
oversight of this vital issue during the remainder of the 113th
Congress.

emergency response provider training

As part of its oversight of first responder training
programs, the Subcommittee received numerous briefings on DHS-
funded training programs and from Federal and State training
providers. Committee staff visited the National Emergency
Response and Rescue Training Center and Maryland Fire Rescue
Institute and observed training and exercise programs.

exercises and simulations

In the First Session of the 113th Congress, the
Subcommittee received a briefing from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's National Exercise Division on the
implementation of changes to the National Exercise Program. The
Subcommittee, through its cyber incident response hearing, also
inquired about lessons learned from National Level Exercise
2012 and efforts to address issues raised in the recently
released after action report. Committee staff also participated
in first responder training. The Subcommittee will continue to
examine the extent to which lessons learned are reviewed,
incorporated into programs and plans, and shared with State and
local exercise participants.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

cybersecurity

The Subcommittee held a series of hearings on the topic of
cybersecurity examining the cyber threat, Department of
Homeland Security capabilities and resources, privacy and civil
liberty concerns, the security of the Federal Data Services Hub
and Healthcare exchanges, and the implementation of Executive
Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity.
Additionally, the Subcommittee held over 300 meetings with
stakeholders to determine topics of oversight and need for
additional legislation.

science and technology

The Subcommittee held a series of meetings with the Science
and Technology Directorate examining the Department's progress
in developing and delivering products and technology solutions
to their customers. As a result of these meetings, the
Subcommittee drafted and reported favorably H.R. 2952, the
Critical Infrastructure Research and Development (CIRDA) Act.

Chemical Facility Security

The Subcommittee held a series of meetings with
stakeholders, including other committees of jurisdiction in the
House and Senate, to conduct oversight and consider possible
reauthorization of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
Standards program at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
In addition, the Subcommittee held a hearing on August 1, 2013
on the topic of mismanagement of the CFATS program. This
hearing was held pursuant to clause 2(n)(1) of the rule as `` .
. . mismanagement in Government programs which that committee
may authorize'' and clause 2(p), as DHS Management is a ``high-
risk'' issue identified by the Comptroller General of the U.S.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

departmental efficiency and waste, fraud, abuse, and duplication

During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee on Oversight
and Management Efficiency oversaw the Department of Homeland
Security's day to day operations to ensure that it was
operating in the most efficient and effective manner possible.
On February 15, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How Wisely is DHS Spending
Taxpayer Dollars?'' The purpose of the hearing was to address
DHS's progress and shortcomings in implementing its various
missions 10 years after the Department's creation, integrating
its components, and its diligence in making sure taxpayer
dollars are being spent efficiently.
Pursuant to Rule X, clause 2(d)(F) of the Rules of the
House of Representatives, the Committee worked to identify
potential opportunities to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary
programs, find efficiencies that will contribute to the
Department's ability to meet its vital missions, and identify
areas for cost savings. On April 26, 2013, the Subcommittee
held a hearing entitled ``Cutting DHS Duplication and Wasteful
Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices and
Watchdog Recommendations.'' The purpose of this hearing was to
assess GAO and Inspector General findings related to
duplication and waste within DHS and examine best practices
identified by the private sector to improve DHS's efficiency
and effectiveness. On September 23, 2013, Subcommittee staff
also received a briefing from GAO officials on the Department's
progress in addressing GAO's High-Risk List area of
``Strengthening Department of Homeland Security Management
Functions.'' The area includes issues related to DHS
acquisition management, financial management, information
technology management, human capital management, and management
integration. GAO's High-Risk List includes areas at high risk
due to vulnerabilities to fraud, waste, abuse, and
mismanagement. GAO has included DHS management functions in its
List since 2003.
The Committee investigated homeland security programs and
practices, as warranted. In an effort to review the TSA's
Passenger Screening Technologies, on February 5, 2013, the
Members of the Subcommittee on Transportation Security and the
Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency received a
joint classified briefing. The Subcommittees were briefed by
representatives from the Government Accountability Office and
the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector
General. The briefing addressed the development of the
technology, challenges with the acquisition process, among
other issues. In addition, in light of egregious waste related
to Internal Revenue Service training videos uncovered by the
Treasury Inspector General, the Subcommittee Chair sent a
letter on June 6, 2013 to the Undersecretary for Management.
The purpose of the letter was to determine the cost and types
of internal training materials, especially videos, created by
DHS and its components. To date, the Department has not
provided a response.
The Subcommittee will continue to oversee the efficiency of
the Department and issues related to waste, fraud, abuse, and
duplication.

acquisition management

During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee reviewed the
efforts of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)to improve
acquisition outcomes, and to ensure that effective management
controls are put in place to prevent contract waste, fraud, and
abuse while promoting efficiency and effectiveness. The
Subcommittee reviewed the authorities and activities of the
Undersecretary for Management and Chief Procurement Officer to
ensure the effective management of these key functions. The
Subcommittee also examined the impact of the Department's
acquisition initiatives to enhance processes and improve
outcomes related to its major acquisition programs. On
September 19, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``DHS Acquisition Practices: Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers
Using Defense and Private Sector Lessons Learned.'' The purpose
of the hearing was to examine DHS's acquisition practices to
determine if the Department is effectively implementing its
policies and to assess whether DHS could leverage best
practices and lessons learned from the Defense Department and
the private sector. In February 2013, the Subcommittee Chair
requested to sign-on to ongoing Government Accountability
Office (GAO) work related to CBP's acquisition of border
surveillance technology and DHS's multiyear acquisition
planning process. On March 21, 2013, the Subcommittee Chair,
along with the Subcommittee Ranking Member, requested GAO
conduct a review of the tactical communication acquisition
programs underway in DHS.
The Subcommittee monitored the Department's efforts to
leverage strategic sourcing, as outlined in Federal guidance,
to increase efficiencies. The Subcommittee Chair, along with
the Chair of the Full Committee, requested GAO to examine the
Department's ammunition and weapons procurements.
The Subcommittee will monitor the cost, schedule, and
performance status of major Department acquisition programs.

financial management

In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee oversaw the
Department of Homeland Security's progress to properly manage
financial systems and data to minimize inefficient and wasteful
spending, make more informed decisions to manage its programs
and implement Department policies. The Subcommittee reviewed
the Department's efforts to enhance its managerial cost
accounting, address internal control weaknesses in financial
reporting, achieve a clean audit opinion on its financial
statements, and reduce the reliance on manual data calls to
collect cost information from the various components and
compile consolidated, reliable data. The Subcommittee Chair
sent a letter to the Comptroller General on June 6, 2013 to
sign-on to an ongoing review of DHS financial management
efforts being performed at the request of the Senate Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. GAO issued its
report on September 30, 2013. It contained four recommendations
for executive action. On July 8, 2013, Subcommittee Staff
received a briefing from DHS's Chief Financial Officer
regarding DHS's efforts to modernize its financial systems. On
November 15, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``DHS Financial Management: Investigating DHS's Stewardship of
Taxpayer Dollars.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine
the financial practices within DHS.
The Subcommittee will continue to monitor how efficiently
the Department manages its finances.

information technology management

During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee reviewed the
Department's efforts to address information technology (IT)
challenges, including the management and integration of the
Department's IT systems. The Subcommittee monitored the
Department's progress in IT architectural planning, investment
management, cloud computing, policy development, operations,
and related personnel management. On March 19, 2013, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``DHS Information
Technology: How Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our
Borders and Uphold Immigration Laws?'' The purpose of the
hearing was to assess how IT resources are being effectively
utilized to help secure our borders and uphold immigration laws
and how the Department is exercising proper management and
oversight of its IT investments. The Subcommittee Chair, along
with the Chair of the Full Committee, also requested on May 23,
2013 to sign on to an ongoing GAO review of the TECS
modernization program at the request of the Senate Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The Subcommittee will continue to monitor the Department's
management of its information technology.

departmental workforce

Throughout the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee monitored
the Department's efforts to recruit and retain personnel and to
address employee concerns set forth in the Office of Personnel
Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the Department's
own personnel surveys, which have indicated morale problems
across the Department. The Subcommittee Chair signed on to
ongoing Government Accountability (GAO) work assessing DHS's
recruitment and hiring strategies at the request of the Senate
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The GAO
issued its report on September 17, 2013. It included one
recommendation for executive action. On May 7,
2013,Subcommittee staff were briefed by the Chief Human Capital
Officer on the Employee Engagement Executive Steering Committee
and DHS Leadership training to address the morale issues at the
Department.
The Subcommittee monitored the Department's efforts to
effectively and efficiently consolidate its headquarters from
more than 40 locations throughout the National Capital Region,
known as the St. Elizabeth's Headquarters Consolidation
Project. On March 15, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee
conducted a site visit to the Department of Homeland Security
Consolidated Headquarters at St. Elizabeths. While on campus,
Members toured the facility and were briefed by the Department
on construction progress and the status of consolidation
efforts. As a follow up to this site visit, the Subcommittee
Chair requested on March 20, 2013, the GAO to conduct a
comprehensive review of the consolidation project.
The Subcommittee will continue efforts to oversee the
Department's human capital management.

employee integrity

In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee examined employee
corruption and misconduct issues and their effect on homeland
security. The Subcommittee reviewed Department statistics and
case studies associated with employee integrity issues, as well
as, the effectiveness of policies, procedures, and practices
the Department utilizes to address such issues. The
Subcommittee held a joint hearing with the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security on July 31, 2013, entitled ``TSA
Integrity Challenges: Examining Misconduct by Airport Security
Personnel.'' The purpose of the hearing was to examine the
scope of misconduct within the Transportation Security
Administration and determine to what extent action is being
taken to address employee integrity issues. On August 19, 2013,
the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary
requesting an update on the Department's mandated report on
investigating corruption in DHS.
The Subcommittee will continue its oversight of DHS
employee integrity issues.

united states secret service

In the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee examined the
homeland security operations of the United States Secret
Service, including its critical role of protecting the
President of the United States, among other duties. On April
17, 2013, the Subcommittee held a member briefing with the
Secret Service Director to discuss the Director's goals and
priorities, budget issues, Cartigena employee misconduct
investigation, among other topics.
Subcommittee staff received a briefing from Secret Service
officials on June 27, 2013 on the agency's information
technology modernization efforts. On August 8, 2013,
Subcommittee staff also received a briefing on the next
generation Presidential limousine program and conducted a site
visit at the Secret Service mail screening facility in
Washington D.C. On November 12, Members of the Subcommittee
conducted a site visit to the Secret Service training facility
in Beltsville, Maryland.
The Subcommittee will continue to examine operations of the
United States Secret Service.

privacy and civil liberties

During the 113th Congress, the Subcommittee monitored the
Department's efforts to strike an appropriate balance between
the need to combat terrorist attacks against the United States
with the privacy expectations and civil rights of U.S.
citizens. On February 6, 2013, the Members of the Subcommittee
received a classified briefing on privacy issues and the role
of the Department of Homeland Security and the National
Counterterrorism Center in collecting, analyzing, and storing
intelligence on U.S. persons. The Members were briefed by
representatives from the Department and the National
Counterterrorism Center, and they learned how the Center is
implementing its new ``Guidelines for Access, Retention, Use, &
Dissemination of U.S. Persons Information.''
On June 19, 2013, Subcommittee staff received a briefing
from officials from the Office of Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties on civil liberties concerns at border checkpoints.
The Subcommittee will continue to examine the Department's
balance between security and privacy and civil liberties.

=======================================================================

A P P E N D I C E S

=======================================================================

APPENDIX I

Committee Rules--Committee on Homeland Security

Adopted January 26, 2011

RULE I.--GENERAL PROVISIONS.

(A) Applicability of the Rules of the U.S. House of
Representatives.--The Rules of the U.S. House of
Representatives (the ``House'') are the rules of the
Committee on Homeland Security (the ``Committee'') and
its subcommittees insofar as applicable.

(B) Applicability to Subcommittees.--Except where the
terms ``Full Committee'' and ``subcommittee'' are
specifically mentioned, the following rules shall apply
to the Committee's subcommittees and their respective
Chairmen and Ranking Minority Members to the same
extent as they apply to the Full Committee and its
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member.

(C) Appointments by the Chairman.--Clause 2(d) of Rule
XI of the House shall govern the designation of a Vice
Chairman of the Full Committee.

(D) Recommendation of Conferees.--Whenever the Speaker
of the House is to appoint a conference committee on a
matter within the jurisdiction of the Full Committee,
the Chairman shall recommend to the Speaker of the
House conferees from the Full Committee. In making
recommendations of Minority Members as conferees, the
Chairman shall do so with the concurrence of the
Ranking Minority Member of the Committee.

(E) Motions to Disagree.--The Chairman is directed to
offer a motion under clause 1 of Rule XXII of the Rules
of the House whenever the Chairman considers it
appropriate.

(F) Committee Website.--The Chairman shall maintain an
official Committee web site for the purposes of
furthering the Committee's legislative and oversight
responsibilities, including communicating information
about the Committee's activities to Committee Members,
other Members, and the public at large. The Ranking
Minority Member may maintain a similar web site for the
same purposes. The official Committee web site shall
display a link on its home page to the web site
maintained by the Ranking Minority Member.

(G) Activity Report.--Not later than the 30th day after
June 1 and December 1, the Committee shall submit to
the House a semiannual report on the activities of the
Committee. After adjournment sine die of a regular
session of Congress, or after December 15, whichever
occurs first, the Chair may file the second or fourth
semiannual report with the Clerk at any time and
without approval of the Committee provided that a copy
of the report has been available to each Member of the
Committee for at least seven calendar days and the
report includes any supplemental, minority, or
additional views submitted by a Member of the
Committee.

RULE II.--TIME OF MEETINGS.

(A) Regular Meeting Date.--The regular meeting date and
time for the transaction of business of the Full
Committee shall be at 10:00 a.m. on the first Wednesday
that the House is in Session each month, unless
otherwise directed by the Chairman.

(B) Additional Meetings.--At the discretion of the
Chairman, additional meetings of the Committee may be
scheduled for the consideration of any legislation or
other matters pending before the Committee or to
conduct other Committee business. The Committee shall
meet for such purposes pursuant to the call of the
Chairman.

(C) Consideration.--Except in the case of a special
meeting held under clause 2(c)(2) of House Rule XI, the
determination of the business to be considered at each
meeting of the Committee shall be made by the Chairman.

RULE III.--NOTICE AND PUBLICATION.

(A) Notice.--

(1) Hearings.--Pursuant to clause 2(g)(3) of
rule XI of the Rules of the House of
Representatives, the Chairman of the Committee
shall make public announcement of the date,
place, and subject matter of any hearing before
the Full Committee or subcommittee, which may
not commence earlier than one week after such
notice. However, if the Chairman of the
Committee, with the concurrence of the Ranking
Minority Member, determines that there is good
cause to begin the hearing sooner, or if the
Committee so determines by majority vote, a
quorum being present for the transaction of
business, the Chairman shall make the
announcement at the earliest possible date. The
names of all witnesses scheduled to appear at
such hearing shall be provided to Members no
later than 48 hours prior to the commencement
of such hearing.

(2) Meetings.--The date, time, place and
subject matter of any meeting, other than a
hearing or a regularly scheduled meeting, may
not commence earlier than the third day on
which Members have notice thereof except in the
case of a special meeting called under clause
2(c)(2) of House Rule XI. These notice
requirements may be waived if the Chairman with
the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member,
determines that there is good cause to begin
the meeting sooner or if the Committee so
determines by majority vote, a quorum being
present for the transaction of business.

(a) Copies of any measure or matter to
be considered for approval by the
Committee at any meeting, including any
mark, print or amendment in the nature
of a substitute shall be provided to
the Members at least 24 hours in
advance.

(b) At least 24 hours prior to the
commencement of a meeting for the
markup of a measure or matter, the text
of such measure or matter, including
any mark, print or amendment in the
nature of a substitute, shall be made
publicly available in electronic form
and, to the extent practicable, posted
on the official Committee web site.

(c) Not later than 24 hours after
concluding a meeting to consider a
measure or matter, the text of such
measure or matter as ordered forwarded
or reported, including any adopted
amendments, shall be made publicly
available in electronic form and, to
the extent practicable, posted on the
official Committee web site.

(3) Publication.--The meeting or hearing
announcement shall be promptly published in the
Daily Digest portion of the Congressional
Record. To the greatest extent practicable,
meeting announcements shall be entered into the
Committee scheduling service of the House
Information Resources.

RULE IV.--OPEN MEETINGS AND HEARINGS; BROADCASTING.

(A) Open Meetings.--All meetings and hearings of the
Committee shall be open to the public including to
radio, television, and still photography coverage,
except as provided by Rule XI of the Rules of the House
or when the Committee, in open session and with a
majority present, determines by recorded vote that all
or part of the remainder of that hearing on that day
shall be closed to the public because disclosure of
testimony, evidence, or other matters to be considered
would endanger the national security, compromise
sensitive law enforcement information, tend to defame,
degrade or incriminate a witness, or violate any law or
rule of the House of Representatives.

(B) Broadcasting.--Whenever any hearing or meeting
conducted by the Committee is open to the public, the
Committee shall permit that hearing or meeting to be
covered by television broadcast, internet broadcast,
print media, and still photography, or by any of such
methods of coverage, in accordance with the provisions
of clause 4 of Rule XI of the Rules of the House.
Operation and use of any Committee operated broadcast
system shall be fair and nonpartisan and in accordance
with clause 4(b) of Rule XI and all other applicable
rules of the Committee and the House. Priority shall be
given by the Committee to members of the Press
Galleries. Pursuant to clause 2(e) of rule XI of the
Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee
shall, to the greatest extent practicable, provide
audio and video coverage of each hearing or meeting in
a manner that allows the public to easily listen to and
view the proceedings and shall maintain the recordings
of such coverage in a manner that is easily accessible
to the public.

(C) Transcripts.--A transcript shall be made of the
testimony of each witness appearing before the
Committee during a Committee hearing. All transcripts
of meetings or hearings that are open to the public
shall be made available.

RULE V.--PROCEDURES FOR MEETINGS AND HEARINGS.

(A) Opening Statements.--At any meeting of the
Committee, the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member
shall be entitled to present oral opening statements of
five minutes each. Other Members may submit written
opening statements for the record. The Chairman
presiding over the meeting may permit additional
opening statements by other Members of the Full
Committee or of that subcommittee, with the concurrence
of the Ranking Minority Member.

(B) The Five--Minute Rule.--The time any one Member may
address the Committee on any bill, motion, or other
matter under consideration by the Committee shall not
exceed five minutes, and then only when the Member has
been recognized by the Chairman, except that this time
limit may be extended when permitted by unanimous
consent.

(C) Postponement of Vote.--The Chairman may postpone
further proceedings when a record vote is ordered on
the question of approving any measure or matter or
adopting an amendment. The Chairman may resume
proceedings on a postponed vote at any time, provided
that all reasonable steps have been taken to notify
Members of the resumption of such proceedings,
including, when practicable, circulation of notice by
the Clerk of the Committee. When proceedings resume on
a postponed question, notwithstanding any intervening
order for the previous question, an underlying
proposition shall remain subject to further debate or
amendment to the same extent as when the question was
postponed.

(D) Contempt Procedures.--No recommendation that a
person be cited for contempt of Congress shall be
forwarded to the House unless and until the Full
Committee has, upon notice to all its Members, met and
considered the alleged contempt. The person to be cited
for contempt shall be afforded, upon notice of at least
72 hours, an opportunity to state why he or she should
not be held in contempt prior to a vote of the Full
Committee, with a quorum being present, on the question
whether to forward such recommendation to the House.
Such statement shall be, in the discretion of the
Chairman, either in writing or in person before the
Full Committee.

RULE VI.--WITNESSES.

(A) Questioning of Witnesses.--

(1) Questioning of witnesses by Members will be
conducted under the five--minute rule unless
the Committee adopts a motion permitted by
clause 2(j)(2) of House Rule XI.

(2) In questioning witnesses under the five--
minute rule, the Chairman and the Ranking
Minority Member shall first be recognized. In a
subcommittee meeting or hearing, the Chairman
and Ranking Minority Member of the Full
Committee are then recognized. All other
Members that arrive before the commencement of
the meeting or hearing will be recognized in
the order of seniority on the Committee,
alternating between Majority and Minority
Members. Committee Members arriving after the
commencement of the hearing shall be recognized
in order of appearance, alternating between
Majority and Minority Members, after all
Members present at the beginning of the hearing
have been recognized. Each Member shall be
recognized at least once before any Member is
given a second opportunity to question a
witness.

(3) The Chairman, in consultation with the
Ranking Minority Member, or the Committee by
motion, may permit an extension of the period
of questioning of a witness beyond five minutes
but the time allotted must be equally
apportioned to the Majority party and the
Minority and may not exceed one hour in the
aggregate.

(4) The Chairman, in consultation with the
Ranking Minority Member, or the Committee by
motion, may permit Committee staff of the
Majority and Minority to question a witness for
a specified period of time, but the time
allotted must be equally apportioned to the
Majority and Minority staff and may not exceed
one hour in the aggregate.

(B) Minority Witnesses.--Whenever a hearing is
conducted by the Committee upon any measure or matter,
the Minority party Members on the Committee shall be
entitled, upon request to the Chairman by a majority of
those Minority Members before the completion of such
hearing, to call witnesses selected by the Minority to
testify with respect to that measure or matter during
at least one day of hearing thereon.

(C) Oath or Affirmation.--The Chairman of the Committee
or any Member designated by the Chairman, may
administer an oath to any witness.

(D) Statements by Witnesses.--

(1) Consistent with the notice given, witnesses
shall submit a prepared or written statement
for the record of the proceedings (including,
where practicable, an electronic copy) with the
Clerk of the Committee no less than 48 hours in
advance of the witness's appearance before the
Committee. Unless the 48 hour requirement is
waived or otherwise modified by the Chairman,
after consultation with the Ranking Minority
Member, the failure to comply with this
requirement may result in the exclusion of the
written testimony from the hearing record and/
or the barring of an oral presentation of the
testimony. The Clerk of the Committee shall
provide any such prepared or written statement
submitted to the Clerk prior to the hearing to
the Members of the Committee prior to the
commencement of the hearing.

(2) To the greatest extent practicable, the
written testimony of each witness appearing in
a non--governmental capacity shall include a
curriculum vita and a disclosure of the amount
and source (by agency and program) of any
Federal grant (or subgrant thereof) or contract
(or subcontract thereof) received during the
current fiscal year or either of the two
preceding fiscal years by the witness or by an
entity represented by the witness. Such
disclosures shall be made publicly available,
with appropriate redactions to protect the
privacy of the witness, in electronic form not
later than one day after the witness appears.

RULE VII.--QUORUM.

Quorum Requirements.--Two Members shall constitute a quorum
for purposes of taking testimony and receiving evidence. One--
third of the Members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum
for conducting business, except for (1) reporting a measure or
recommendation; (2) closing Committee meetings to the public,
pursuant to Committee Rule IV; (3) authorizing the issuance of
subpoenas; and (4) any other action for which an actual
majority quorum is required by any rule of the House of
Representatives or by law. The Chairman shall make reasonable
efforts, including consultation with the Ranking Minority
Member when scheduling meetings and hearings, to ensure that a
quorum for any purpose will include at least one Minority
Member of the Committee.

RULE VIII.--DECORUM.

(A) Breaches of Decorum.--The Chairman may punish
breaches of order and decorum, by censure and exclusion
from the hearing; and the Committee may cite the
offender to the House for contempt.

(B) Access to Dais.----Access to the dais before,
during, and after a hearing, markup, or other meeting
of the Committee shall be limited to Members and staff
of the Committee. Subject to availability of space on
the dais, Committee Members' personal staff may be
present on the dais during a hearing if their employing
Member is seated on the dais and during a markup or
other meeting if their employing Member is the author
of a measure or amendment under consideration by the
Committee, but only during the time that the measure or
amendment is under active consideration by the
Committee, or otherwise at the discretion of the
Chairman, or of the Ranking Minority Member for
personal staff employed by a Minority Member.

(C) Wireless Communications Use Prohibited.--During a
hearing, mark--up, or other meeting of the Committee,
ringing or audible sounds or conversational use of
cellular telephones or other electronic devices is
prohibited in the Committee room.

RULE IX.--SUBCOMMITTEES.

(A) Generally.--The Full Committee shall be organized
into the following six standing subcommittees and shall
have specific responsibility for such measures or
matters as the Chairman refers to it:

(1) Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security

(2) Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response and Communications

(3) Subcommittee on Transportation Security

(4) Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

(5) Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies

(6) Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations,
and Management

(B) Selection and Ratio of Subcommittee Members.--The
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Full
Committee shall select their respective Members of each
subcommittee. The ratio of Majority to Minority Members
shall be comparable to the Full Committee, except that
each subcommittee shall have at least two more Majority
Members than Minority Members.

(C) Ex Officio Members.--The Chairman and Ranking
Minority Member of the Full Committee shall be ex
officio members of each subcommittee but are not
authorized to vote on matters that arise before each
subcommittee. The Chairman and Ranking Minority Member
of the Full Committee shall only be counted to satisfy
the quorum requirement for the purpose of taking
testimony and receiving evidence.

(D) Powers and Duties of Subcommittees.--Except as
otherwise directed by the Chairman of the Full
Committee, each subcommittee is authorized to meet,
hold hearings, receive testimony, mark up legislation,
and report to the Full Committee on all matters within
its purview. Subcommittee Chairmen shall set hearing
and meeting dates only with the approval of the
Chairman of the Full Committee. To the greatest extent
practicable, no more than one meeting and hearing
should be scheduled for a given time.

(E) Special Voting Provision.--If a tie vote occurs in
a Subcommittee on the question of forwarding any
measure to the Full Committee, the measure shall be
placed on the agenda for Full Committee consideration
as if it had been ordered reported by the Subcommittee
without recommendation.

RULE X.--COMMITTEE PANELS.

(A) Designation.--The Chairman of the Full Committee,
with the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member,
may designate a panel of the Committee consisting of
Members of the Committee to inquire into and take
testimony on a matter or matters that warrant enhanced
consideration and to report to the Committee.

(B) Duration.--No panel appointed by the Chairman shall
continue in existence for more than six months after
the appointment.

(C) Party Ratios and Appointment.--Consistent with the
party ratios established by the Majority party, all
Majority members of the panels shall be appointed by
the Chairman of the Committee, and all Minority members
shall be appointed by the Ranking Minority Member of
the Committee. The Chairman of the Committee shall
choose one of the Majority Members so appointed who
does not currently chair another Subcommittee of the
Committee to serve as Chairman of the panel. The
Ranking Minority Member of the Committee shall
similarly choose the Ranking Minority Member of the
panel.

(D) Ex Officio Members.--The Chairman and Ranking
Minority Member of the Full Committee may serve as ex--
officio Members of each committee panel but are not
authorized to vote on matters that arise before a
committee panel and shall not be counted to satisfy the
quorum requirement for any purpose other than taking
testimony.

(E) Jurisdiction.--No panel shall have legislative
jurisdiction.

(F) Applicability of Committee Rules.--Any designated
panel shall be subject to all Committee Rules herein.

RULE XI.--REFERRALS TO SUBCOMMITTEES.

Referral of Bills and Other Matters by Chairman.--Except
for bills and other matters retained by the Chairman for Full
Committee consideration, each bill or other matter referred to
the Full Committee shall be referred by the Chairman to one or
more subcommittees within two weeks of receipt by the
Committee. In referring any measure or matter to a
subcommittee, the Chair may specify a date by which the
subcommittee shall report thereon to the Full Committee. Bills
or other matters referred to subcommittees may be reassigned or
discharged by the Chairman.

RULE XII.--SUBPOENAS.

(A) Authorization.--Pursuant to clause 2(m) of Rule XI
of the House, a subpoena may be authorized and issued
under the seal of the House and attested by the Clerk
of the House, and may be served by any person
designated by the Full Committee for the furtherance of
an investigation with authorization by--

(1) a majority of the Full Committee, a quorum
being present; or

(2) the Chairman of the Full Committee, after
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member
of the Full Committee, during any period for
which the House has adjourned for a period in
excess of 3 days pursuant to a concurrent
resolution when, in the opinion of the Chairman
of the Full Committee, authorization and
issuance of the subpoena is necessary to obtain
the material or testimony set forth in the
subpoena. The Chairman of the Full Committee
shall notify Members of the Committee of the
authorization and issuance of a subpoena under
this rule as soon as practicable, but in no
event later than one week after service of such
subpoena.

(B) Disclosure.--Provisions may be included in a
subpoena with the concurrence of the Chairman and the
Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, or by
the Committee, to prevent the disclosure of the Full
Committee's demands for information when deemed
necessary for the security of information or the
progress of an investigation, including but not limited
to prohibiting the revelation by witnesses and their
counsel of Full Committee's inquiries.

(C) Subpoena duces tecum.--A subpoena duces tecum may
be issued whose return to the Committee Clerk shall
occur at a time and place other than that of a
regularly scheduled meeting.

(D) Affidavits and Depositions.--The Chairman of the
Full Committee, in consultation with the Ranking
Minority Member of the Full Committee, or the Committee
may authorize the taking of an affidavit or deposition
with respect to any person who is subpoenaed under
these rules but who is unable to appear in person to
testify as a witness at any hearing or meeting. Notices
for the taking of depositions shall specify the date,
time and place of examination. Depositions shall be
taken under oath administered by a Member or a person
otherwise authorized by law to administer oaths. Prior
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member of the
Full Committee shall include written notice three
business days before any deposition is scheduled to
provide an opportunity for Minority staff to be present
during the questioning.

RULE XIII.--COMMITTEE STAFF.

(A) Generally.--Committee staff members are subject to
the provisions of clause 9 of House Rule X and must be
eligible to be considered for routine access to
classified information.

(B) Staff Assignments.--For purposes of these rules,
Committee staff means the employees of the Committee,
detailees, fellows, or any other person engaged by
contract or otherwise to perform services for, or at
the request of, the Committee. All such persons shall
be either Majority, Minority, or shared staff. The
Chairman shall appoint, determine remuneration of,
supervise, and may remove Majority staff. The Ranking
Minority Member shall appoint, determine remuneration
of, supervise, and may remove Minority staff. In
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member, the
Chairman may appoint, determine remuneration of,
supervise and may remove shared staff that is assigned
to service of the Committee. The Chairman shall certify
Committee staff appointments, including appointments by
the Ranking Minority Member, as required.

(C) Divulgence of Information.--Prior to the public
acknowledgement by the Chairman or the Committee of a
decision to initiate an investigation of a particular
person, entity, or subject, no member of the Committee
staff shall knowingly divulge to any person any
information, including non--classified information,
which comes into his or her possession by virtue of his
or her status as a member of the Committee staff, if
the member of the Committee staff has a reasonable
expectation that such information may alert the subject
of a Committee investigation to the existence, nature,
or substance of such investigation, unless authorized
to do so by the Chairman or the Committee.

RULE XIV.--COMMITTEE MEMBER AND COMMITTEE STAFF TRAVEL.

(A) Approval of Travel.--Consistent with the primary
expense resolution and such additional expense
resolutions as may have been approved, travel to be
reimbursed from funds set aside for the Committee for
any Committee Member or Committee staff shall be paid
only upon the prior authorization of the Chairman.
Travel may be authorized by the Chairman for any
Committee Member or Committee staff only in connection
with official Committee business, such as the
attendance of hearings conducted by the Committee and
meetings, conferences, site visits, and investigations
that involve activities or subject matters under the
general jurisdiction of the Full Committee.

(1) Proposed Travel by Majority Party Committee
Members and Committee Staff.--In the case of
proposed travel by Majority party Committee
Members or Committee staff, before such
authorization is given, there shall be
submitted to the Chairman in writing the
following: (a) the purpose of the travel; (b)
the dates during which the travel is to be made
and the date or dates of the event for which
the travel is being made; (c) the location of
the event for which the travel is to be made;
(d) the estimated total cost of the travel; and
(e) the names of Members and staff seeking
authorization. On the basis of that
information, the Chairman shall determine
whether the proposed travel is for official
Committee business, concerns a subject matter
under the jurisdiction of the Full Committee,
and is not excessively costly in view of the
Committee business proposed to be conducted.

(2) Proposed Travel by Minority Party Committee
Members and Committee Staff.--In the case of
proposed travel by Minority party Committee
Members or Committee staff, the Ranking
Minority Member shall provide to the Chairman a
written representation setting forth the
information specified in items (a), (b), (c),
(d) and (e) of subparagraph (1) and his or her
determination that such travel complies with
the other requirements of subparagraph (1).

(B) Foreign Travel.--All Committee Members and
Committee staff requests for foreign travel must
include a written representation setting forth the
information specified in items (a), (b), (c), (d) and
(e) of subparagraph (A)(1) and be submitted to the
Chairman not fewer than ten business days prior to the
start of the travel. Within thirty days of the
conclusion of any such foreign travel authorized under
this rule, there shall be submitted to the Chairman a
written report summarizing the information gained as a
result of the travel in question, or other Committee
objectives served by such travel. The requirements of
this section may be waived or abridged by the Chairman.

(C) Compliance with Committee Travel Policy and
Guidelines.--Travel must be in accordance with the
Committee Travel Policy and Guidelines, as well as with
House Rules, the Travel Guidelines and Regulations and
any additional guidance set forth by the Committee on
Ethics and the Committee on House Administration.
Committee Members and staff shall follow these rules,
policies, guidelines, and regulations in requesting and
proceeding with any Committee--related travel.

RULE XV.--CLASSIFIED AND CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

(A) Security Precautions.--Committee staff offices,
including Majority and Minority offices, shall operate
under strict security precautions administered by the
Security Officer of the Committee. A security officer
shall be on duty at all times during normal office
hours. Classified documents and controlled unclassified
information (CUI)-- formerly known as sensitive but
unclassified (SBU) information-- may be destroyed,
discussed, examined, handled, reviewed, stored,
transported and used only in an appropriately secure
manner in accordance with all applicable laws,
executive orders, and other governing authorities. Such
documents may be removed from the Committee's offices
only in furtherance of official Committee business.
Appropriate security procedures, as determined by the
Chairman in consultation with the Ranking Minority
Member, shall govern the handling of such documents
removed from the Committee's offices.

(B) Temporary Custody of Executive Branch Material.--
Executive branch documents or other materials
containing classified information in any form that were
not made part of the record of a Committee hearing, did
not originate in the Committee or the House, and are
not otherwise records of the Committee shall, while in
the custody of the Committee, be segregated and
maintained by the Committee in the same manner as
Committee records that are classified. Such documents
and other materials shall be returned to the Executive
branch agency from which they were obtained at the
earliest practicable time.

(C) Access by Committee Staff.--Access to classified
information supplied to the Committee shall be limited
to Committee staff members with appropriate security
clearances and a need--to--know, as determined by the
Chairman or Ranking Minority Member, and under the
direction of the Majority or Minority Staff Directors.

(D) Maintaining Confidentiality.--No Committee Member
or Committee staff shall disclose, in whole or in part
or by way of summary, to any person who is not a
Committee Member or authorized Committee staff for any
purpose or in connection with any proceeding, judicial
or otherwise, any testimony given before the Committee
in executive session. Classified information and
controlled unclassified information (CUI) shall be
handled in accordance with all applicable laws,
executive orders, and other governing authorities and
consistently with the provisions of these rules and
Committee procedures.

(E) Oath.--Before a Committee Member or Committee staff
may have access to classified information, the
following oath (or affirmation) shall be executed:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will not
disclose any classified information received in
the course of my service on the Committee on
Homeland Security, except as authorized by the
Committee or the House of Representatives or in
accordance with the Rules of such Committee or
the Rules of the House.

Copies of the executed oath (or affirmation) shall be
retained by the Clerk of the Committee as part of the
records of the Committee.

(F) Disciplinary Action.--The Chairman shall
immediately consider disciplinary action in the event
any Committee Member or Committee staff member fails to
conform to the provisions of these rules governing the
disclosure of classified or unclassified information.
Such disciplinary action may include, but shall not be
limited to, immediate dismissal from the Committee
staff, criminal referral to the Justice Department, and
notification of the Speaker of the House. With respect
to Minority staff, the Chairman shall consider such
disciplinary action in consultation with the Ranking
Minority Member.

RULE XVI.--COMMITTEE RECORDS.

(A) Committee Records.--Committee Records shall
constitute all data, charts and files in possession of
the Committee and shall be maintained in accordance
with clause 2(e) of House Rule XI .

(B) Legislative Calendar.--The Clerk of the Committee
shall maintain a printed calendar for the information
of each Committee Member showing any procedural or
legislative measures considered or scheduled to be
considered by the Committee, and the status of such
measures and such other matters as the Committee
determines shall be included. The calendar shall be
revised from time to time to show pertinent changes. A
copy of such revisions shall be made available to each
Member of the Committee upon request.

(C) Members Right To Access.--Members of the Committee
and of the House shall have access to all official
Committee Records. Access to Committee files shall be
limited to examination within the Committee offices at
reasonable times. Access to Committee Records that
contain classified information shall be provided in a
manner consistent with these rules.

(D) Removal of Committee Records.--Files and records of
the Committee are not to be removed from the Committee
offices. No Committee files or records that are not
made publicly available shall be photocopied by any
Member.

(E) Executive Session Records.--Evidence or testimony
received by the Committee in executive session shall
not be released or made available to the public unless
agreed to by the Committee. Members may examine the
Committee's executive session records, but may not make
copies of, or take personal notes from, such records.

(F) Availability of Committee Records.--The Committee
shall keep a complete record of all Committee action
including recorded votes and attendance at hearings and
meetings. Information so available for public
inspection shall include a description of each
amendment, motion, order, or other proposition,
including the name of the Member who offered the
amendment, motion, order, or other proposition, and the
name of each Member voting for and each Member voting
against each such amendment, motion, order, or
proposition, as well as the names of those Members
present but not voting. Such record shall be made
available to the public at reasonable times within the
Committee offices and also made publicly available in
electronic form and posted on the official Committee
web site within 48 hours of such record vote.

(G) Separate and Distinct.--All Committee records and
files must be kept separate and distinct from the
office records of the Members serving as Chairman and
Ranking Minority Member. Records and files of Members'
personal offices shall not be considered records or
files of the Committee.

(H) Disposition of Committee Records.--At the
conclusion of each Congress, non--current records of
the Committee shall be delivered to the Archivist of
the United States in accordance with Rule VII of the
Rules of the House.

(I) Archived Records.--The records of the Committee at
the National Archives and Records Administration shall
be made available for public use in accordance with
Rule VII of the Rules of the House. The Chairman shall
notify the Ranking Minority Member of any decision,
pursuant to clause 3(b)(3) or clause 4(b) of the Rule,
to withhold a record otherwise available, and the
matter shall be presented to the Committee for a
determination on the written request of any member of
the Committee. The Chairman shall consult with the
Ranking Minority Member on any communication from the
Archivist of the United States or the Clerk of the
House concerning the disposition of noncurrent records
pursuant to clause 3(b) of the Rule.

RULE XVII.-- COMMITTEE RULES.

(A) Availability of Committee Rules in Electronic
Form.--Pursuant to clause 2(a) of rule XI of the Rules
of the House of Representatives, the Committee shall
make its rules publicly available in electronic form
and posted on the official Committee web site and shall
submit such rules for publication in the Congressional
Record not later than 30 days after the Chairman of the
Committee is elected in each odd--numbered year.

(B) Changes to Committee Rules.--These rules may be
modified, amended, or repealed by the Full Committee
provided that a notice in writing of the proposed
change has been given to each Member at least 48 hours
prior to the meeting at which action thereon is to be
taken and such changes are not inconsistent with the
Rules of the House of Representatives.
APPENDIX II

Membership Changes

January 2013

On January 3, 2013, Mr. Michael T. McCaul of Texas was elected as
Chair, and Mr. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi as Ranking Member
pursuant to H. Res. 6 and H. Res. 7, respectively.
Minority Members were elected to the Committee on January 3, 2013,
pursuant to H. Res. 7.
Majority Members were elected to the Committee on January 4, 2013,
pursuant to H. Res. 17.
Ms. Janice Hahn of California resigned as a Member of the Committee
on Homeland Security on January 14, 2013; and Mr. Filemon Vela of
Texas, Mr. Steven A. Horsford of Nevada, and Mr. Eric Swalwell of
California were elected to the Committee pursuant to H. Res. 22.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee
Membership was as follows:
__________

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Brian Higgins, New York
Loretta Sanchez, California
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Loretta Sanchez, California
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Keith J. Rothfus, Pennsylvania
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Yvette D. Clarke, New York
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Filemon Vela, Texas
Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Keith J. Rothfus, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Ron Barber, Arizona
Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana,
Ranking Member
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Eric Swalwell, California
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Brian Higgins, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)

April 2013

Mr. Keith J. Rothfus of Pennsylvania resigned as a Member of the
Committee on Homeland Security on April 16, 2013.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee
Memberships was as follows:
__________

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Yvette D. Clarke, New York
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Filemon Vela, Texas
Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Vacancy
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Ron Barber, Arizona
Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

June 2013

Mr. Mark Sanford of South Carolina was elected to the Committee
pursuant to H. Res. 257 on June 12, 2013.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee
Memberships was as follows:
__________

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Steve Daines, Montana
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Yvette D. Clarke, New York
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Filemon Vela, Texas
Steven A. Horsford, Nevada
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Richard Hudson, North Carolina
Steve Daines, Montana
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Ron Barber, Arizona
Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Candice S. Miller, Michigan
Susan W. Brooks, Indiana
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana,
Ranking Member
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Eric Swalwell, California
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

Peter T. King, New York
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
Mark Sanford, South Carolina
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Donald M. Payne, Jr., New Jersey
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Brian Higgins, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)

August 2013

On August 1, 2013, the Chair announced the appointments of Vice
Chairs for the Subcommittees.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee
Memberships was as follows:
__________

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Brian Higgins, New York
Loretta Sanchez, California
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Steven M. Palazzo, Mississippi
Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania
Chris Stewart, Utah, Vice Chair
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
(ex officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Loretta Sanchez, California
Beto O'Rourke, Texas
Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(ex officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

December 11, 2013

Mr. Chris Stewart of Utah resigned as a Member of the Committee on
Homeland Security on April 16, 2013.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and Subcommittee
Memberships was as follows:
__________

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S. Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Richard Hudson, North Carolina, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Susan W. Brooks, Indiana, Chairman

List of Public Laws

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Law Date Approved Bill Title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-27.............................. August 9, 2013......... H.R. 1344............. ``Helping Heroes Fly
Act''
To amend title 49, United
States Code, to direct
the Assistant Secretary
of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security
Administration) to
provide expedited air
passenger screening to
severely injured or
disabled members of the
Armed Forces and
severely injured or
disabled veterans, and
for other purposes.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX IV

Committee Reports
H.Rpt. 113-87 Border Security Results Act of 2013
H.R.1417 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to
develop a comprehensive strategy to gain and
maintain operational control of the
international borders of the United States, and
for other purposes.
Filed May 20, 2013.H.Rpt. 113-273 Medical Preparedness Allowable Use Act
H.R. 1791 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
codify authority under existing grant guidance
authorizing use of Urban Area Security
Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant
Program funding for enhancing medical
preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass
prophylaxis capabilities, with an amendment.
Filed November 21, 2013.H.Rpt. 113-274 TSA Loose Change Act
H.R. 1095 To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct
the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security Administration) to
transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport
security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations
that provide places of rest and recuperation at
airports for members of the Armed Forces and
their families, and for other purposes, with an
amendment.
Filed November 21, 2013.H.Rpt. 113-275 Transportation Security Acquisition Reform Act
H.R. 2719 To require the Transportation Security
Administration to implement best practices and
improve transparency with regard to technology
acquisition programs, and for other purposes,
with an amendment.
Filed November 21, 2013.H. Rpt. 113-278 Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act
H.R. 1204 of 2013
To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct
the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security Administration) to
establish an Aviation Security Advisory
Committee, and for other purposes.
Filed December 2, 2013.H. Rpt. 113-294 Homeland Security Cybersecurity Boots-on-the-
H.R. 3107 Ground Act
To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to
establish cybersecurity occupation
classifications, assess the cybersecurity
workforce, develop a strategy to address
identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce,
and for other purposes.
Filed December 12, 2013.

APPENDIX V

Status of Legislation Referred to the Committee

PUBLIC LAWS

Pub. Law 112-54 H.R. 1444._Helping Heroes Fly Act. To amend
title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary
of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration)
to provide expedited air passenger screening to severely
injured or disabled members of the Armed Forces and severely
injured or disabled veterans, and for other purposes. Referred
to Homeland Security Mar. 21, 2013. Rules suspended. Passed
House amended May 21, 2013; Roll No. 166: 413-0. Received in
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation May
22, 2013.

LEGISLATION IN THE SENATE

H.R. 1542._WMD Intelligence and Information Sharing Act of
2013. To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish
weapons of mass destruction intelligence and information
sharing functions of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of
the Department of Homeland Security and to require
dissemination of information analyzed by the Department to
entities with responsibilities relating to homeland security,
and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Apr. 12,
2013. Rules suspended. Passed House July 22, 2013; Roll No.
375: 388-3. Received in Senate and referred to Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs July 23, 2013.
H.R. 1095._ TSA Loose Change Act. To amend title 49, United
States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland
Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer
unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to
nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and
recuperation at airports for members of the Armed Forces and
their families, and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland
Security Mar. 12, 2013. Committee ordered reported Oct. 29,
2013. Reported amended Nov. 21, 2013; Rept. 113-274. Passed
House Dec. 3, 2013; voice. Received in Senate and referred to
Commerce, Science and Transportation Dec. 9, 2013.
H.R. 1204._Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act
of 2013. To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the
Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation
Security Administration) to establish an Aviation Security
Advisory Committee, and for other purposes. Referred to
Homeland Security Mar. 14, 2013. Committee ordered reported
Oct. 29, 2013. Reported amended Dec. 2, 2013; Rept. 113-278.
Passed House Dec. 3, 2013; Roll No. 617: 411-3. Received in
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation
Dec. 9, 2013.
H.R. 2719._Transportation Security Acquisition Reform Act.
To require the Transportation Security Administration to
implement best practices and improve transparency with regard
to technology acquisition programs, and for other purposes.
Referred to Homeland Security Jul. 18, 2013. Committee ordered
reported Oct. 29, 2013. Reported amended Nov. 21, 2013; Rept.
113-275. Passed House Dec. 3, 2013; Roll No. 616: 416-3.
Received in Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and
Transportation Dec. 9, 2013.

LEGISLATION REPORTED TO THE HOUSE

H.R. 1417 (S. 683)._Border Security Results Act of 2013. To
require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a
comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control
of the international borders of the United States, and for
other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Apr. 9, 2013.
Reported amended May 20, 2013; Rept. 113-87.
H.R. 1791._Medical Preparedness Allowable Use Act. To amend
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under
existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security
Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding
for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and
mass prophylaxis capabilities. Referred to Homeland Security
Apr. 26, 2013. Committee ordered reported Oct. 29, 2013.
Reported amended Nov. 21, 2013; Rept. 113-273.
H.R. 3107._Homeland Security Cybersecurity Boots-on-the-
Ground Act To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to
establish cybersecurity occupation classifications, assess the
cybersecurity workforce, develop a strategy to address
identified gaps in the cybersecurity workforce, and for other
purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Sep. 17, 2013.
Committee ordered reported Oct. 29, 2013. Reported amended Dec.
12, 2013; Rept. 113-294.

LEGISLATION ORDERED TO BE REPORTED TO THE HOUSE

H.R. 2952._CIRDA Act of 2013. To amend the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 to make certain improvements in the laws
relating to the advancement of security technologies for
critical infrastructure protection, and for other purposes.
Referred to Homeland Security Aug. 1, 2013. Committee ordered
reported Oct. 29, 2013.
APPENDIX VI

Executive Communications, Memorials, Petitions and Presidential
Messages

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

Executive Communication 651
March 11, 2013--Letter from Acting Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's
Privacy Office's report entitled, ``2012 Data Mining Report to
Congress'', pursuant to Pub. L. 110-53 (121 Stat. 266).

Executive Communication 2178
June 28, 2013--Letter from Chief, Border Security
Regulations Branch, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Department's final rule-Extension of Border
Zone in the State of New Mexico [Docket No.: USCBP-2012-0030]
(RIN: 1651-AA95) received June 10, 2013, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 3765
November 19, 2013--A letter from the Chief Privacy
Officer, Department of Homeland Security, transmitting a report
entitled, ``DHS Privacy Office 2013 Annual Report to
Congress''.

Executive Communication 3782
November 20, 2013--A letter from the Chief, Border
Security Regulations Branch, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Department's final rule--Technical Corrections
Relating to the Procedures for the Production or Disclosure of
Information in State or Local Criminal Proceedings [CBP Dec.
13-18] received November 18, 2013, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).

----------

MEMORIALS

Memorial 38
May 24, 2013--Memorial of the General Assembly of the
State of California, relative to Assembly Joint Resolution No.
4 urging the federal government to fund necessary improvements
at the San Ysidro, Calexico, and Otay Mesa Ports of Entry.

Memorial 39
May 24, 2013--Memorial of the General Assembly of the
State of California, relative to Assembly Joint Resolution No.
4 urging the federal government to fund necessary improvements
at the San Ysidro, Calexico, and Otay Mesa Ports of Entry.

Memorial 119
July 31, 2013--Memorial of the Senate of the State of
Louisiana, relative to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 119
memorializing Congress to establish a task force to study and
make recommendations relative to implementation of the Federal
REAL ID Act of 2005 in Louisiana.

----------

PRESIDENTIAL MESSAGES

Presidential Message 8
April 24, 2013--Communication from the President of the
United States, transmitting the Administration's 2013 National
Drug Control Strategy, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1504.
APPENDIX VII

Committee Staff

MAJORITY STAFF

Greg Hill, Chief of Staff
Paul Anstine, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security
Jennifer Arangio, Sr. Counsel
Diana Bergwin, Professional Staff Member
Kate Bonvechio, Professional Staff Member
Mandy Bowers, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism
and Intelligence
Luke Burke, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Robert Carretta, Advisor for Transportation Security / DHS
Reauthorization
Alan Carroll, Professional Staff Member
Ryan Consaul, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Oversight and
Management Efficiency
April Corbett, Press Secretary / Director of Digital Media
Brett DeWitt, Sr. Advisor for Cybersecurity
Laura Fullerton, Sr. Advisor for Strategy and Coalitions
Tina Garcia, Staff Assistant
Michael Geffroy, Deputy Chief of Staff / Chief Counsel
Steven Giaier, Parliamentarian / Counsel
Nicole Halavik, Professional Staff Member
Eric Heighberger, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications
Deborah Jordan, Subcommittee Clerk
Joshua Katz, Advisor
Kerry Kinirons, Sr. Counsel
Kyle Klein, Professional Staff Member
Tom Leonard, Advisor for Border Security
Alex Manning, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies
Natalie Matson, Staff Assistant
Dirk Maurer, Counsel
Kyle McFarland, Assistant Security Director
Jason Miller, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Margaret Anne Moore, Special Assistant / Press Assistant
James Murphy, Professional Staff Member
John Neal, Professional Staff Member
Joan O'Hara, Deputy Chief Counsel
R. Nicholas Palarino, Deputy Chief of Staff Member / Policy
Amanda Parikh, Staff Director, Subcommittee on Transportation
Security
Meghann Peterlin, Sr. Professional Staff Member / Security
Director
Erik Peterson, Staff Assistant
Michael Rosen, Sr. Advisor
Bradley Saull, Professional Staff Member
Charlotte Sellmeyer, Communications Director
Dennis Terry, Subcommittee Clerk
Jake Vreeburg, Deputy Parliamentarian

MINORITY STAFF

I. Lanier Avant, Staff Director
Moira Bergin, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Cherri Branson, Chief Counsel for Oversight
Rosaline Cohen, Chief Counsel for Legislation
Adam M. Comis, Communications Director
Shante Gauthier, Executive Assistant
Hope Goins, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
Director and Counsel
Claytrice Henderson, Legislative Assistant
Cory Horton, Professional Staff Member
Nicole Wade Johnson, Office Manager
Deborah R. Mack, Professional Staff Member
Alison B. Northrop, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security Director
K. Christopher Schepis, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Tamla T. Scott, Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiencies Director
Nicole Tisdale, Sr. Professional Staff Member / Counsel
Brian B. Turbyfill, Subcommittee on Transportation Security
Director
Shaun West, Professional Staff Member

SHARED COMMITTEE STAFF

Dawn M. Criste, Chief Financial Officer
Michael S.Twinchek, Chief Clerk
Natalie Nixon, Deputy Chief Clerk / Administrator
Heather Crowell, GPO Detailee, Printer

FORMER MAJORITY STAFF

Ellen Carlin, Professional Staff
Kevin Carroll, Sr. Counsel
Kevin Gundersen, Sr. Professional Staff
Zach Harris, Assistant Security Director / Professional Staff
Michael McAdams, Deputy Press Secretary
James Meek, Advisor for Counterterrorism
Krista Powers, Professional Staff
Mary Rose Rooney, Professional Staff Member
Monica Sanders, Sr. Counsel /Investigator
Michael Spierto, Professional Staff Member
Kerry Ann Watkins, Staff Director, Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence

FORMER MINORITY STAFF

Hillary Anderson, Research Assistant
Pizza Ashby, Professional Staff Member
Curtis Brown, Professional Staff Member
Synarus Greene, Professional Staff Member
Marisela Salayandia, Sr. Professional Staff Member
Charles Snyder, Professional Staff Member
APPENDIX VIII

Witnesses

----------

-- A --

Adamski, Shayne, Senior Manager of Digital Engagement, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Ahern, Jayson, Principal, Chertoff Group.
LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Alden, Edward, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow, Council on
Foreign Relations.
LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Allen, Thad, (ADM, Ret.), Senior Vice President, Booz Allen
Hamilton.
LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to
the Homeland.''
Ashwood, Albert, Chairman, NEMA Legislative Committee,
Director, Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management,
Testifying on behalf of the National Emergency
Management Association.
LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Astrue, Michael, Former Social Security Commissioner, Former
U.S.Department of Health and Human Services General
Counsel.
LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans'
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''

-- B --

Barfi, Barak, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
Beckerman, Michael, President and CEO, The Internet
Association.
LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Bejtlich, Richard, Chief Security Officer and Security Services
Architect, Mandiant.
LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China,
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
Benda, Paul, Director, Advanced Research Projects Agency,
Science & Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
Bercerra, Xavier, a Representative in Congress from the 34th
District, State of California.
LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Berman, Ilan, Vice President, American Foreign Policy Council.
LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China,
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
LOME, July 9, 2013, ``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's
Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere.''
Berrick, Cathleen, Managing Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office.
LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''
LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Berteau, David J., Senior Vice President and Director,
International Security Program, Center for Strategic
and International Studies.
LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices:
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Bhimani, Anish B., Chairman, Financial Services Information
Sharing and Analysis Center.
LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical
Infrastructure.''
Biddle, Stephen, PAdjunct Senior Fellow for Defense Policy,
Council on Foreign Relations.
LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications
for Homeland Security.''
Blanchard, Lauren Ploch, Specialist in African Affairs,
Congressional Research Service, The Library of
Congress.
LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
Blank, Jonah, PhD., Senior Political Analyst, The RAND
Corporation.
LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Borer, David A., General Counsel, American Federation of
Government Employees.
LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Borkowski, Mark, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Technology
Innovation and Acquisition, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand
the State of Border Security.''
Borras, Rafael, Under Secretary for Management, U.S. Department
of Homeland Security.
LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices:
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Bowen, Mark, Sheriff, Hamilton County, Indiana.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Braniff, Bill, Executive Director, National Consortium for the
Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism ,
University of Maryland.
LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate
with the American People?''
Browne, Christopher U., Airport Manager, Washington Dulles
International Airport, testifying on behalf of the
American Association of Airport Executives.
LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''

-- C --

Caine, Virginia, Dr., Director, Public Health Administration,
Marion County (IN) Public Health Department.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Caldwell, Stephen L., Director, Homeland Security and Justice,
U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid:
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Callahan, Mary Ellen, Partner, Jenner & Block and Former Chief
Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Apr. 25, 2013, ``Striking the Right Balance:
Protecting Our Nation's Critical Infrastructure from Cyber
Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
Cardenas, Jorge L., Vice President, Asset Management and
Centralized Services, Public Service Enterprise Group,
Inc.
LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Chao, Henry, Deputy Chief Information Officer, Deputy Director
of the Office of Information Services, Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing
Apparatus.''
Chung, Luke, President, FMS, Inc.
LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed
Healthcare.gov?''
Cilluffo, Frank J., Director, Homeland Security Policy
Institute and Co-Director, Cyber Center for National
and Economic Security, The George Washington
University.
LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China,
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
LCTI, Sep. 18, 2013, ``Understanding the Threat to the
Homeland from AQAP.''
Cohen, John, Deputy Counterterrorism Coordinator and Senior
Advisor to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LFULL, Jul. 11, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Cole, Leonard, Dr., Newark, New Jersey.
LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the
Homeland.''
Commodore, Shene, Government Contracts & Business Manager,
Intertek, testifying on behalf of the Security Industry
Association.
LTS, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA
Acquisition Reform.''
Cornyn, John, Senator, State of Texas.
LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Correa, Soraya, Associate Director, Enterprise Services
Directorate, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed
Healthcare.gov?''

-- D --

Daddario, Richard, Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism,
New York City Police Department.
LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the
Homeland.''
Daly, Kay, Assistant Inspector General, Audit Services, U.S.
Department of
Health and Human Services.
LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans'
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''
Davis, Edward F., III, Commissioner, Boston Police Department.
LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First
Look.''
DeFrancis, Suzanne C., Chief Public Affairs Officer, American
Red Cross.
LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Derig, Paul, Environmental Health and Safety Manger III, J.R.
Simplot Company, testifying on behalf of the
Agricultural Retailers Association.
LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid:
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Dicken, John, Director, Health Care, U.S. Government
Accountability Office.
LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing
Apparatus.''
Dinkins, James, Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security
Investigations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How
Secure is America?''
Dippel, Donnie, President, Texas Ag Industries Association.
LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid:
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Duncan, Alan R., Assistant Inspector General for Security and
Information Technology Services, Inspector General for
Tax Administration, Department of the Treasury.
LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing
Apparatus.''
Dunlap, Ken, Global Director, Security & Travel Facilitation,
International Air Transport Association.
LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Durkovich, Caitlin, Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure
Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
testifying on behalf of the Interagency Security
Committee.
LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''

-- E --

Edwards, Charles K., Deputy Inspector General, Office of
Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LOME, Mar. 19, 2013, ``DHS Information Technology: How
Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and
Uphold Immigration Laws?''
LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
LCIPST, May 16 2013, ``Facilitating Cyber Threat
Information Sharing and Partnering with the Private Sector to
Protect Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS
Capabilities.''
LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
English, Charley, Director, Georgia Emergency Management
Agency, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency
Management Association.
LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response:
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.''
Ervin, Clark Kent, Partner, Patton Boggs, LLP.
LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to
the Homeland.''
Escobar, Veronica, El Paso County Judge, El Paso, Texas.
LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand
the State of Border Security.''

-- F --

Fair, C. Christine, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Georgetown
University, Security Studies Program in the Edumnd A.
Walsh School of Foreign Service.
LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Falconer, Dolan P., Jr., Co - Founder, Chairman & General
Manger, Scan Tech Holdings.
LTS, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA
Acquisition Reform.''
Farah, Douglas, President, IBI Consultants.
LOME, July 9, 2013, ``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's
Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere.''
Farrell, Brenda S., Director, Defense Capabilities and
Management, Military and DOD Civilian Personnel Issues,
U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance
Processes.''
Fisher, Eric A., PhD, Senior Specialist, Science and
Technology, Congressional Research Service, Library of
Congress.
LCIPST, Jul. 18, 2013, ``Oversight of Executive Order
13636 and Development of the Cybersecurity Framework.''
Fisher, Michael J., Chief, Border Patrol, Department of
Homeland Security.
LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand
the State of Border Security.''
LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look
Like?''
Freeman, Geoff, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice
President, U.S. Travel Association.
LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Fulghum, Chip, Acting Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Department
of Homeland Security.
LOME, Nov. 15, 2013, ``DHS Financial Management:
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.''

-- G --

Gambler, Rebecca, Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look
Like?''
LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How
Secure is America?''
LBMS, Sep. 26, 2013, ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission
Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.''
Gerstein, Daniel, Deputy Under Secretary, Science and
Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
Ghilarducci, Mark, Director, California Governor's Office of
Emergency Services, testifying on behalf of the
National Governors Association and the Governors
Homeland Security Advisors Council.
LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Gilmore, James, III, President, Free Congress Foundation.
LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''
Giuliani, Rudolph ``Rudy'' W., former Mayor, New York City.
LFULL, Jul. 10, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Goldstein, Mark, Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues, U.S.
Government Accountability Office.
LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''
Gowadia, Huban, Dr. Acting Director, Domestic Nuclear Detection
Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the
Homeland.''
Graves, Margaret H., Deputy Chief Information Officer, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Mar. 19, 2013, ``DHS Information Technology: How
Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and
Uphold Immigration Laws?''
Greenwalt, William C., Visiting Fellow, Marilyn Ware Center for
Security Studies, American Enterprise Institute.
LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices:
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private
Sector Lessons Learned.''

-- H --

Halinski, John, Deputy Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
LOME & TS, July 31, 2013, ``TSA Integrity Challenges:
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.''
Hayes, Gary W., Chief Information Officer, Centerpoint Energy.
LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical
Infrastructure.''
Henry, Shawn, President, CrowdStrike Services.
LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to
the Homeland.''
Hill, John, Executive Director, Indiana Department of Homeland
Security.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Hoffman, Bruce, Professor and Director, Center for Peace and
Security Studies and Security, Georgetown University.
LFULL, Jul. 10, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Humire, Joseph M., Executive Director, Center for a Secure Free
Society.
LOME, July 9, 2013, ``Threat to the Homeland: Iran's
Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere.''

-- I, J --

Jensen, Robert, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate
with the American People?''
Jones, Seth G., Ph.D., Associate Director, International
Security and Defense Policy Center.
LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
Joscelyn, Thomas, Senior Fellow, Foundation for the Defense of
Democracies.
LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications
for Homeland Security.''
Judd, Brandon, President, National Border Patrol Council.
LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''

-- K --

Katulis, Brian, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
LCTI, Sep. 18, 2013, ``Understanding the Threat to the
Homeland from AQAP.''
Kelley, Colleen M., National President, The National Treasury
Employees Union.
LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''
Kessler, Tamara, Acting Officer for Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate
with the American People?''
Khan, Asif, Director, Financial Management and Assurance, U.S.
Government.
LOME, Nov. 15, 2013, ``DHS Financial Management:
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer
Dollars.''Accountability Office.
Kierce, W. Greg, Sgt. Director, Jersey City Office of
Emergency, Management and Homeland Security.
LEPRC, July 9, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part2 #Govt/NGOs.''
Killough, Craig, Vice President, Organization Markets, Project
Management Institute.
LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Knight, H. Clifton, Chief Medical Officer, Community Health
Network.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Kolasky, Richard, Director, Implementation Task Force, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Jul. 18, 2013, ``Oversight of Executive Order
13636 and Development of the Cybersecurity Framework.''
Kostro, Stephanie Sanok, Senior Fellow and Acting Director,
Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Program, Center
for Strategic and International Studies.
LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
Krush, Waylon, Chief Executive Officer, Lunarline, Inc.
LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed
Healthcare.gov?''

-- L --

Lee, William D., Rear Admiral, Deputy For Operations Policy and
Capabilities, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look
Like?''
Leiter, Michael E., Former Director, National Counterterrorism
Center.
LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to
the Homeland.''
LFULL, Jul. 10, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the
Homeland: From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Libicki, Martin C., Senior Management Scientist, RAND
Corporation.
LCIPST, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Cyber Threats from China,
Russia and Iran: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure.''
Lieberman, Joseph I., former Senator from the State of
Connecticut.
LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First
Look.''
Lord, Stephen M., Director, Forensic Audits and Investigative
Services, Government Accountability Office.
LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability:
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
LOME & TS, July 31, 2013, ``TSA Integrity Challenges:
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.''
LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
Lovegrove, Brett, Chief Executive, City Security and Resilience
Network (CSARN).
LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
Lute, Jane Holl, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical
Infrastructure.''
Lyon, Shonnie, Acting Director, Office of Biometric Identity
Management, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How
Secure is America?''

-- M --

Mack. Diane, University Director, Emergency Management and
Continuity, Indiana University.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Mackin, Michele, Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management,
U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices:
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Manning, Timothy, Deputy Administrator, Protection and National
Preparedness, Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Mar. 19, 2013, ``Homeland Security Grants:
Measuring Our Investments.''
LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Marshall, Gregory, Chief Security Officer, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''
LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance
Processes.''
Maurer, David C., Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office.
LEPRC, Mar. 19, 2013, ``Homeland Security Grants:
Measuring Our Investments.''
LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''
McAleenan, Kevin, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look
Like?''
LBMS, Mar. 20, 2013, ``Measuring Outcomes to Understand
the State of Border Security.''
McAllister, Scott, Deputy Under Secretary, State and Local
Program Officer, Office of Intelligence and Analysis,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LCTIApril 25, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Counterterrorism Efforts to Combat a Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Attack on the
Homeland.''
McGuire, Cheri F., Vice President, Global Government Affairs &
Cybersecurity Policy, Symantec.
LCIPST, Apr. 25, 2013, ``Striking the Right Balance:
Protecting Our Nation's Critical Infrastructure from Cyber
Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
Mellor, Richard, Vice President, Loss Prevention, National
Retail Federation.
LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
Milholland, Terence V., Chief Technology Officer, Internal
Revenue Service.
LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing
Apparatus.''
Miller, Merton W., Associate Director of Investigations,
Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management.
LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance
Processes.''
Misztal, Blaise Acting Director of Foreign Policy, Bipartisan
Policy Center
Molitor, Paul, Assistant Vice President, National Electrical
Manufacturers Association.
LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response:
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.''
Moulton, Sean, Director, Open Government Policy, Center for
Effective Government.
LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid:
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Mullen, Michael C., Executive Director, Express Association of
America.
LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''

-- N --

Napolitano, Janet, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LFULL, Apr. 18, 2013, ``The President's FY 2014 Budget
Request for the Department of Homeland Security.''
Nelson, Rick ``Ozzie'', Vice President for Business
Development, Cross Match Technologies.
LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''

-- O --

Obeime, Mercy, Dr., Director, Community and Global Health,
Franciscan St. Francis Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Olsen, Matthew G., Director, National Counterterrorism Center.
LFULL, 11, 2013, ``Assessing Attacks on the Homeland:
From Fort Hood to Boston.''
Orgeron, Craig, Chief Information Officer and Executive
Director, Department of Information Technology
Services, State of Mississippi, testifying on behalf of
the National Association of State Chief Information
Officers.
LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response:
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.''
Orusa, Steven, Fire Chief, Fishers, Indiana.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Outten-Mills, Deborah, Acting Assistant Inspector General for
Inspections, Office of Inspector General, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
LOME & TS, July 31, 2013, ``TSA Integrity Challenges:
Examining Misconduct by Airport Security Personnel.''

-- P --

Parente, Stephen T., Ph.D., Minnesota Insurance Industry Chair
of Health Finance, Director, Medical Industry
Leadership Institute and Professor, Department of
Finance, Carlson School of Management, University of
Minnesota.
LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans'
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''
Patterson, L. Eric, Director, Federal Protective Service, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Facility Protection: Implications
of the Navy Yard Shooting on Homeland Security.''
Payne, Jason Matthew, Philanthropy Lead, Palantir Technologies.
LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Pearl, Marc, President & CEO, Homeland Security & Defense
Business Council.
LTS, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Stakeholder Perspectives on TSA
Acquisition Reform.''
Pearson, Harriet, Partner, Hogan Lovells.
LCIPST, Apr. 25, 2013, ``Striking the Right Balance:
Protecting Our Nation's Critical Infrastructure from Cyber
Attack and Ensuring Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
Pfeifer, Joseph W., Chief of Counterterrorism and Emergency
Preparedness, Fire Department of New York.
LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Pinkerton, Sharon L., Senior Vice President, Legislative and
Regulatory Policy, Airlines for America.
LTS, Apr. 11, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security: Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Pinkham, Doug, President, Public Affairs Council.
LOME, Jun. 14, 2013, ``Why Can't DHS Better Communicate
with the American People?''
Pistole, John S., Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Mar. 14, 2013, ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk-
Based Security.''
LTS, Nov. 14, 2013, ``TSA's SPOT Program and Initial
Lessons From the LAX Shooting.''
Powner, David, Director, Information Technology Management
Issues, Government Accountability Office.
LOME, Mar. 19, 2013, ``DHS Information Technology: How
Effectively Has DHS Harnessed IT to Secure Our Borders and
Uphold Immigration Laws?''
Priest, Chad, Chief Executive Officer, MESH Coalition, Inc.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Prioletti, Brian, Assistant Director, Special Security
Directorate, National Counterintelligence Executive,
Office of Director of National Intelligence.
LCTI, Nov. 13, 2013, ``The Insider Threat to Homeland
Security: Examining Our Nation's Security Clearance
Processes.''
Profeta, Louis, M.D., F.A.C.E.P., Medical Director of Disaster
Preparedness, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis,
Indiana.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''

-- Q, R --

Ragsdale, Daniel H., Deputy Director, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
Reed, R. Lawrence, II, M.D., F.A.C.S., F.C.C., Director of
Trauma Services, Indiana University Health Methodist
Hospital.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''
Reese, Shawn, Analyst, Emergency Management and Homeland
Security Policy, Congressional Research Service,
Library of Congress.
LOME, Feb. 15, 2013, ``Assessing DHS 10 years later: How
Wisely is DHS Spending Taxpayer Dollars?''
Richards, Anne L., Assistant Inspector General for Audits,
Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Mar. 19, 2013, ``Homeland Security Grants:
Measuring Our Investments.''
LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices:
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private
Sector Lessons Learned.''
LOME, Nov. 15, 2013, ``DHS Financial Management:
Investigating DHS's Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars.''
Richardson, Michelle, Legislative Counsel, American Civil
Liberties Union.
LFULL, Mar. 13, 2013, ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and
Responsibilities to Protect the Nation's Critical
Infrastructure.''
Ridge, Tom J., Former Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''
Romine, Charles H., PhD, Director, Information Technology
Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
LCIPST, Jul. 18, 2013, ``Oversight of Executive Order
13636 and Development of the Cybersecurity Framework.''
Rosenblum, Marc R., PhD, Specialist in Immigration Policy,
Congressional Research Service, The Library of
Congress.
LBMS, Feb. 26, 2013, ``What Does a Secure Border Look
Like?''

-- S --

Sadler, Steve, Assistant Administrator, Office of Intelligence
and Analysis, Transportation Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability:
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
Salo, Matt, Executive Director, National Association of
Medicaid Directors.
LCIPST, Sep. 11, 2013, ``The Threat to Americans'
Personal Information: A Look into the Security and Reliability
of the Health Exchange Data Hub.''
Scales, Robert H., Jr. (Major General, Ret. U.S. Army), former
Commandant of the U.S. Army War College.
LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications
for Homeland Security.''
Schueur, Michael, Adjunct Professor, Center for Peace and
Security Studies, Georgetown University.
LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
Schwartz, James H., Fire Chief, Arlington County Fire
Department, Arlington, Virginia, testifying on behalf
of the International Association of Fire Chiefs
Schwartz, Kurt N., Undersecretary, Executive Office of Public
Safety and Security, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First
Look.''
Scott, Timothy J., Chief Security Officer, Corporate Director,
Emergency Services and Security, The Dow Chemical
Company.
LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid:
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''
Sena, Mike, Deputy Director, Northern California Regional
Intelligence Center, testifying on behalf of the
National Fusion Center Association.
LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response:
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.''
Servidio, Joseph A., Rear Admiral, Assistant Commandant for
Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability:
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
Shays, Christopher, Former Representative in Congress from the
4th District of Connecticut.
LFull, Sep. 10, 2013, ``Crisis in Syria: Implications
for Homeland Security.''
Simcox, Robin, Research Fellow, The Henry Jackson Society.
LCTI, May 22, 2013, ``Assessing the Threat to the
Homeland from al Qaeda Operations in Iran and Syria.''
Soloway, Stan, President and CEO, Professional Services
Council.
LOME, Sep. 19, 2013, ``DHS Acquisition Practices:
Improving Outcomes for Taxpayers Using Defense and Private
Sector Lessons Learned.''
Southers, Erroll G., Professor and Associate Director of
Research Transition, DHS National Center for Risk &
Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), Sol
Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern
California.
LFULL, May 9, 2013, ``The Boston Bombings: A First
Look.''
Spangller, Kathy, Vice President, U.S. Programs, Save the
Children.
LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Stana, Richard M., Former Director, Homeland Security and
Justice, Government Accountability Office.
LBMS, June 23, 2013, ``A Study in Contrasts: House and
Senate Approaches to Border Security.''
Stanek, Richard W., Sheriff, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
LFull, Oct. 9, 2013, ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: How
Westerners Joining Terror Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
Stempfley, Roberta ``Bobbie'', Acting Assistant Secretary,
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LCIPST, May 16 2013, ``Facilitating Cyber Threat
Information Sharing and Partnering with the Private Sector to
Protect Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS
Capabilities.''
LEPRC & CIPST, Oct. 30, 2013, ``Cyber Incident Response:
Bridging the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.''
LFULL, Nov. 13, 2013, ``Cyber Side-Effects: How Secure
is the Personal Information Entered into the Flawed
Healthcare.gov?''
Stepka, Matthew, Vice President, Technology for Social Impact,
Google.org.
LEPRC. Mar. 19, 2013, ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: How
#SocialMedia & New Tech are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery #Disasters #Part1 #Privatesector.''
Stern, Paul G., PhD., Board Director, Business Executives for
National Security.
LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Stier, Max, President and CEO, Partnership for Public Service.
LFULL, Dec. 12, 2013, ``Help Wanted at DHS: Implications
of Leadership Vacancies on the Mission and Morale.''

-- T --

Tankel, Stephen, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, American
University and Nonresident Scholar, South Asia Program,
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
LCTI, June 12, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland Against Mumbai-Style Attacks
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba.''
Tavenner, Marilyn B., Administrator, Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.
LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing
Apparatus.''

-- U, V --

Velasquez, Andrew, III, Regional Administrator, FEMA Region 5,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Aug. 6, 2013, (Carmel, Indiana) ``Assessing
Central Indiana's Preparedness for a Mass Casualty Event.''

-- W --

Wagner, John, Acting Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Field Operations, Customs and Border Protection, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 21, 2013, ``Visa Security and Overstays: How
Secure is America?''
LBMS, Sep. 26, 2013, ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission
Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.''
Walker, David M., Founder and CEO, The Comeback America
Initiative.
LFULL, Feb. 13, 2013, ``A New Perspective on Threats to
the Homeland.''
Walker, Jeffrey W., Senior Emergency Manager, Licking County,
Ohio, testifying on behalf of the International
Association of Emergency Managers.
LEPRC, Sep. 19, 2013, ``Assessing the Nation's State of
Preparedness: A Federal, State, and Local Perspective.''
Waters, Karen Shelton, Assistant Administrator, Office of
Acquisition, Transportation Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, May 8, 2013, ``TSA Procurement Reform: Saving
Taxpayer Dollars Through Smarter Spending Practices.''
Werfel, Danny, Principal Deputy Commissioner, Internal Revenue
Service.
LCIPST and the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform's Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements, Jul. 17, 2013, ``Evaluating Privacy, Security,
and Fraud Concerns with ObamaCare's Information Sharing
Apparatus.''
Willis, Henry H., PhD., Director, RAND Homeland Security and
Defense Center.
LOME, Apr. 26, 2013, ``Cutting DHS Duplication and
Wasteful Spending: Implementing Private Sector Best Practices
and Watchdog Recommendations.''
Winkowski, Thomas S., Deputy Commissioner, Performing the
duties of the Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LOME, Apr. 12, 2013, ``The Impact of Sequestration on
Homeland Security: Scare Tactics or Possible Threat?''
Woodring, Marcus, [Captain, USCG (ret)], Managing Director,
Health, Safety, Security and Environmental, Port of
Houston Authority.
LBMS, June 18, 2013, ``Threat, Risk and Vulnerability:
The Future of the TWIC Program.''
Woods, John, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Sep. 26, 2013, ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 Commission
Recommendation: Implementing Biometric Exit.''
Wulf, David, ISCD Director, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Aug. 1, 2013, ``West Fertilizer, Off the Grid:
The Problem of Unidentified Chemical Facilities.''

-- X, Y, Z --

Zelvin, Larry, Director, National Cybersecurity and
Communications Integration Center, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LCIPST, May 16 2013, ``Facilitating Cyber Threat
Information Sharing and Partnering with the Private Sector to
Protect Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment of DHS
Capabilities.''
Zimmerman, Katherine, Senior Analyst Critical Threats Project,
The American Enterprise Institute.
LCTI, Sep. 18, 2013, ``Understanding the Threat to the
Homeland from AQAP.''
APPENDIX IX

Printed Hearings\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ FULL -- Full Committee; CTI -- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism
and Intelligence; BMS -- Border and Maritime Security; CIPST --
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security
Technologies; OME -- Subcommittee on Oversight and Management
Efficiency; TS -- Subcommittee on Transportation Security; EPRC --
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications
Number Title Date113-1 ``A New Perspective on Threats February 13, 2013
to the Homeland.''
FULL113-2 ``Assessing DHS 10 Years Later: February 15, 2013
How Wisely is DHS Spending
Taxpayer Dollars?''
OME113-3 ``What Does a Secure Border February 26, 2013
Look Like?''
BMS113-4 ``DHS Cybersecurity: Roles and March 13, 2013
Responsibilities to Protect
the Nation's Critical
Infrastructure.''
FULL113-5 ``TSA's Efforts to Advance Risk- March 14, 2013
Based Security.''
TS113-6 ``Homeland Security Grants: March 19, 2013
Measuring Our Investments.''
EPRC113-7 ``DHS Information Technology: March 19, 2013
How Effectively Has DHS
Harnessed IT To Secure Our
Borders and Uphold Immigration
Laws?''
OME113-8 ``Measuring Outcomes to March 20, 2013
Understand the State of Border
Security.''
BMS113-9 ``Cyber Threats from China, March 20, 2013
Russia and Iran: Protecting
American Critical
Infrastructure.''
CIPST113-10 ``The Impact of Sequestration April 12, 2013
on Homeland Security: Scare
Tactics or Possible Threat?''
OME113-11 ``The President's FY 2014 April 18, 2013
Budget Request for the
Department of Homeland
Security.''
FULL113-12 ``Counterterrorism Efforts to April 25, 2013
Combat a Chemical, Biological,
Radiological, and Nuclear
(CBRN) Attack on the
Homeland.''
CTI113-13 ``Striking the Right Balance: April 25, 2013
Protecting Our Nation's
Critical Infrastructure from
Cyber Attack and Ensuring
Privacy and Civil Liberties.''
CIPST113-14 ``Cutting DHS Duplication and April 26, 2013
Wasteful Spending:
Implementing Private Sector
Best Practices and Watchdog
Recommendations.''
OME113-15 ``TSA Procurement Reform: May 8, 2013
Saving Taxpayer Dollars
Through Smarter Spending
Practices.''
TS113-16 ``The Boston Bombings: A First May 9, 2013
Look.''
FULL113-17 ``Facilitating Cyber Threat May 16, 2013
Information Sharing and
Partnering with the Private
Sector to Protect Critical
Infrastructure: An Assessment
of DHS Capabilities.''
CIPST113-18 ``Visa Security and Overstays: May 21, 2013
How Secure is America?''
BMS113-19 ``Assessing the Threat to the May 22, 2013
Homeland from al Qaeda
Operations in Iran and
Syria.''
CTI113-20 ``Emergency MGMT 2.0: ...................
``How #SocialMedia & New Tech June 4, 2013
are Transforming Preparedness, ...................
Response, & Recovery ...................
#Disasters #Part1 July 9, 2013
#Privatesector.''
``How #SocialMedia & New Tech
are Transforming Preparedness,
Response, & Recovery
#Disasters #Part2 #Govt/
NGOs.''
EPRC113-21 ``Protecting the Homeland June 12, 2013
Against Mumbai-Style Attacks
and the Threat from Lashkar-e-
Taiba.''
CTI113-22 ``Why Can't DHS Better June 14, 2013
Communicate with the American
People?''
OME113-23 ``Threat, Risk and June 18, 2013
Vulnerability: The Future of
the TWIC Program.''
BMS113-24 ``Threat to the Homeland: July 9, 2013
Iran's Extending Influence in
the Western Hemisphere.''
OME113-25 ``Evaluating Privacy, Security, July 17, 2013
and Fraud Concerns with
ObamaCare's Information
Sharing Apparatus.''
CIPST Joint with the Committee
on Oversight and Government
Reform Subcommittee on Energy
Policy, Health Care and
Entitlements113-26 ``Stakeholder Perspectives on July 17, 2013
TSA Acquisition Reform.''
TS113-27 ``Oversight of Executive Order July 18, 2013
13636 and Development of the
Cybersecurity Framework.''
CIPST113-28 ``A Study in Contrasts: House July 23, 2013
and Senate Approaches to
Border Security.''
BMS113-29 ``TSA Integrity Challenges: July 31, 2013
Examining Misconduct by
Airport Security Personnel.''
OME & TS113-30 ``West Fertilizer, Off the August 1, 2013
Grid: The Problem of
Unidentified Chemical
Facilities.''
CIPST113-31 ``Assessing Central Indiana's August 6, 2013
Preparedness for a Mass Carmel, Indiana
Casualty Event''
EPRC113-32 ``Crisis in Syria: Implications September 10, 2013
for Homeland Security.''
FULL113-33 ``The Threat to Americans' September 11, 2013
Personal Information: A Look
into the Security and
Reliability of the Health
Exchange Data Hub.''
CIPST113-34 ``Understanding the Threat to September 18, 2013
the Homeland from AQAP.''
CTI113-35 ``Assessing the Nation's State September 19, 2013
of Preparedness: A Federal,
State, and Local
Perspective.''
EPRC113-36 ``DHS Acquisition Practices: September 19, 2013
Improving Outcomes for
Taxpayers Using Defense and
Private Sector Lessons
Learned.''
OME113-37 ``Fulfilling A Key 9/11 September 26, 2013
Commission Recommendation:
Implementing Biometric Exit.''
BMS113-38 ``From al-Shabaab to al-Nusra: October 9, 2013
How Westerners Joining Terror
Groups Overseas Affect the
Homeland.''
FULL113-39 ``Cyber Incident Response: October 30, 2013
Bridging the Gap Between
Cybersecurity and Emergency
Management.''
EPRC and CIPST113-40 ``Facility Protection: October 30, 2013
Implications of the Navy Yard
Shooting on Homeland
Security.''
OME113-41 ``Cyber Side-Effects: How November 13, 2013
Secure is the Personal
Information Entered into the
Flawed Healthcare.gov?''
FULL113-42 ``The Insider Threat to November 13, 2013
Homeland Security: Examining
Our Nation's Security
Clearance Processes.''
CTI113-43 ``TSA's SPOT Program and November 14, 2013
Initial Lessons From the LAX
Shooting.''
TS113-44 ``DHS Financial Management: November 15, 2013
Investigating DHS's
Stewardship of Taxpayer
Dollars.''
OME113-45 ``Help Wanted at DHS: December 12, 2013
Implications of Leadership
Vacancies on the Mission and
Morale.''
FULL
APPENDIX X

Committee Prints

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
113-A.................................. Rules of the Committee on
Homeland Security for the
113th Congress.------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Views

ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF RANKING MEMBER BENNIE G. THOMPSON

During the 113th Congress, Democratic Members of the
Homeland Security Committee have diligently worked to assure
that the programs, policies, and practices of the Department of
Homeland Security are effective and efficient in: safeguarding
the nation from the terrorist threat; addressing the
destructive impact of natural disasters; mitigating known and
unknown vulnerabilities; and ensuring resiliency in the
operation of both publicly- and privately-owned facilities and
infrastructures. The Democratic Members are committed to
protecting the homeland. In the event of a terrorist attack or
other catastrophic occurrence, the Democratic Members of the
Committee will work to ensure that the well-being of each
impacted American is the paramount interest of Congress.
The work undertaken by the Democratic Members of this
Committee has taken various forms, including introducing
legislation, arranging briefings from Administration officials,
and sending oversight requests to the Department of Homeland
Security. Most importantly, these efforts have been a
continuation of work done by the Democratic Majority in the
110th and 111th Congresses. Despite minority status, Democrats
have found a way to follow through on our earlier efforts
designed to protect the American people.
Under the Rules of the House, Activity Reports are intended
to reflect a comprehensive review of a Committee's legislative
and oversight activities. The goal must be to produce a report
of the highest caliber to inform our constituents--the American
taxpayer--of the actions we have taken on their behalf.
Unfortunately, in producing the Activity Report, the
Majority opted to include meetings and other actions that were
neither officially noticed under the rules of the House nor
committee proceedings. The report contains several instances of
vague, dateless references to meetings between Majority staff
and external, non-governmental stakeholders. The Minority was
neither invited to these meetings nor informed of their
occurrence. These one-party undertakings are referenced in the
report as ``committee'' activities. While the Committee has
generally enjoyed bipartisan cooperation, Minority requests
that these references be changed to reflect their true nature
were rejected.
The occurrence of these one-party meetings raises questions
about the influence these non-governmental stakeholders may
have had on the work of this Committee. Alternatively, it is
unclear whether these meetings had any goal or purpose.
To identify inaccuracies is not intended to raise the
implication that the actions were taken for partisan reasons.
Given the nature of many of the events, it is likely that if
informed, the Minority would have participated.
However, the reality remains that the Minority was not
informed. The Activity Report should be an accurate
representation of Committee's actions. One-party activities
undertaken without appropriate notice should not be re-defined
as ``Committee'' activities. The exclusion of the Minority,
either purposely or unintentionally, makes these events
ineligible to be considered ``Committee'' activities:
Below is a sample of the meetings and other events that
Minority Members and staff were not invited to attend or were
not officially noticed, and therefore, should not be included
in the Committee's Activity Report:
On January 28, 2013, Committee staff attended a roundtable
to gain stakeholder perspectives on FirstNet and the
development of the National Public Safety Broadband Network
(PSBN).
On February 7-8, 2013, the Chair of the CIPST Subcommittee
and staff traveled to New York City, New York, to receive
briefings from representatives of the financial services
sector.
On February 22, 2013, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Office of Emergency Communications to
discuss the Department of Homeland Security's role on the
FirstNet board and with the Public Safety Advisory Committee
(PSAC).
On February 25, 2013, Committee staff met with the Director
of Texas A&M University's Foreign and Zoonotic Disease Defense
(FAZD) Center to receive a briefing of FAZD's biosurveillance
efforts.
On March 20, 2013, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee received an update from the TSA Administrator on
TSA's Screening Partnership Program.
On June 19, 2013, the Chair of the OME Subcommittee met
with the Director of FLETC, to obtain an overview of FLETC's
operations.
On August 6, 2013, CIPST Subcommittee staff received a
briefing from representatives of the Department of Homeland
Security on the release of a $920 million Request for Proposal
(RFP) for the Development, Operations and Maintenance of the
Federal Enterprise Security Network Program.
On August 14-15, 2013, Committee staff visited Texas A&M
University to observe homeland security and emergency
management training programs at the Texas Engineering Extension
Service and learn about other homeland security programs
conducted by Texas A&M.
On October 30, 2013, CIPST Subcommittee staff received a
briefing from representatives of the Department of Homeland
Security regarding the progress of the government-wide adoption
of the $6 billion Continuous Diagnostic and Mitigation Program,
which will consolidate Federal cybersecurity practices under
one set of requirements and to ascertain contract awards and
timelines for deployment.
The Minority looks forward to continuing a bipartisan and
cooperative relationship with the Majority and hopes that the
Second Session of the 113th Congress will not involve one-party
meetings and events that should rightfully involve Members of
the Committee, regardless of party affiliation.
This Committee's mission--safeguarding the nation from the
terrorist threat; addressing the destructive impact of natural
disasters; mitigating known and unknown vulnerabilities; and
ensuring resiliency in the operation of both publicly and
privately-owned facilities and infrastructures--must not be
undermined by partisan division.

Bennie G. Thompson.