[Senate Report 111-45]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 104
111th Congress Report
SENATE
1st Session 111-45
======================================================================
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2010
_______
July 9, 2009.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mr. Dorgan, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
REPORT
[To accompany S. 1436]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1436)
making appropriations for energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010,
and for other purposes, favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.
The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the
bill (H.R. 0000) making appropriations for energy and water
development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2010, and for other purposes, reports the same to
the Senate with an amendment, and an amendment to the title,
and recommends that the bill as amended do pass.
Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2010
Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $34,271,000,000
Amount of 2009 appropriations........................... 92,533,165,000
Amount of 2010 budget estimate.......................... 34,914,709,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
2009 appropriations................................. -58,262,165,000
2010 budget estimate................................ -643,709,000
CONTENTS
----------
Page
Purpose.......................................................... 4
Summary of Estimates and Recommendations......................... 4
Title I:
Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
Corps of Engineers--Civil:
General Investigations............................... 16
Construction, General................................ 32
Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries..... 50
Operation and Maintenance, General................... 52
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................ 73
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...... 74
General Expenses..................................... 74
General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil........ 76
Title II:
Department of the Interior:
Central Utah Project Completion Account.................. 78
Bureau of Reclamation:
Water and Related Resources.......................... 78
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.............. 86
California Bay-Delta Restoration..................... 86
Policy and Administration............................ 86
General Provisions--Department of the Interior........... 87
Title III:
Department of Energy:
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy................... 89
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.......... 96
Nuclear Energy....................................... 97
Fossil Energy Research and Development............... 100
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............... 102
Strategic Petroleum Reserve.......................... 102
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................... 102
Energy Information Administration.................... 103
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 103
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
Fund................................................... 104
Science.................................................. 104
High Energy Physics.................................. 105
Nuclear Physics...................................... 105
Biological and Environmental Research................ 105
Basic Energy Sciences................................ 105
Nuclear Waste Disposal................................... 108
Departmental Administration.............................. 109
Office of Inspector General.............................. 109
Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons Activities............................... 110
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................. 115
Naval Reactors................................... 117
Office of the Administrator...................... 118
Environmental and Other Defense Activities:
Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 118
Other Defense Activities............................. 121
Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal....................... 121
Power Marketing Administrations:
Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power
Administration................................. 122
Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power
Administration................................. 122
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and
Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration. 122
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and
Expenses........................................... 123
General Provisions--Department of Energy................. 154
Title IV:
Independent Agencies:
Appalachian Regional Commission.......................... 155
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.................. 155
Delta Regional Authority................................. 156
Denali Commission........................................ 156
Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................ 156
Office of Inspector General.......................... 157
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board..................... 157
Tennessee Valley Authority Office of the Inspector
General................................................ 157
General Provision--Independent Agencies.................. 158
Title V: General Provisions...................................... 159
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 160
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules
of the
Senate......................................................... 160
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 161
Budgetary Impact Statement....................................... 166
Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items............ 166
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority........................ 230
PURPOSE
The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for
the fiscal year 2010 beginning October 1, 2009, and ending
September 30, 2010, for energy and water development, and for
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources
development programs and related activities of the Department
of the Army, Civil Functions--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
Civil Works Program in title I; for the Department of the
Interior's Bureau of Reclamation in title II; for the
Department of Energy's energy research activities, including
environmental restoration and waste management, and atomic
energy defense activities of the National Nuclear Security
Administration in title III; and for related independent
agencies and commissions, including the Appalachian Regional
Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The fiscal year 2010 budget estimates for the bill total
$34,914,709,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The
recommendation of the Committee totals $34,271,000,000. This is
$643,709,000 below the budget estimates and $58,262,165,000
below the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year.
Subcommittee Hearings
The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water held
three sessions in connection with the fiscal year 2010
appropriation bill. Witnesses included officials and
representatives of the Federal agencies under the
subcommittee's jurisdiction.
The recommendations for fiscal year 2010 therefore, have
been developed after careful consideration of available data.
Votes in the Committee
By a vote of 30 to 0 the Committee on July 9, 2009,
recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the
Senate.
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
INTRODUCTION
The Corps of Engineers is made up of approximately 35,000
civilian and 650 military members that perform both military
and civil works functions. The military and civilian engineers,
scientists and other specialists work hand in hand as leaders
in engineering and environmental matters. The diverse workforce
of biologists, engineers, geologists, hydrologists, natural
resource managers, and other professionals meets the demands of
changing times and requirements as a vital part of America's
Army.
The Corps' mission is to provide quality, responsive
engineering services to the Nation including:
--Planning, designing, building and operating water resources
and other civil works projects. (Navigation, Flood
Control, Environmental Protection, Disaster Response,
et cetera);
--Designing and managing the construction of military
facilities for the Army and Air Force. (Military
Construction); and
--Providing design and construction management support for
other Defense and Federal agencies. (Interagency and
International Services).
The Energy and Water bill only funds the Civil Works
missions of the Corps of Engineers. Approximately 23,000
civilians and about 190 military officers are responsible for
this nationwide mission.
From our hundreds of rivers, lakes, and wetlands to our
thousands of miles of coastal shoreline, we are fortunate in
America to enjoy an abundance of water resources. As a Nation,
we value these resources for their natural beauty; for the many
ways they help meet human needs; and for the fact that they
provide habitat for thousands of species of plants, fish and
wildlife.
The Congress has given the Corps of Engineers the
responsibility of helping to care for these important aquatic
resources.
Through its Civil Works program the Corps carries out a
wide array of projects that provide:
--Coastal storm damage reduction;
--Disaster preparedness and response;
--Environmental protection and restoration;
--Flood damage reduction;
--Hydropower;
--Navigable waters;
--Recreational opportunities;
--Regulatory oversight and
--Water supply.
One of the biggest challenges the Corps and other
Government agencies face is finding the right balance among the
often conflicting concerns our society has related to our water
resources. Society wants these resources to help fuel economic
growth (navigation, hydropower). Society wants them to provide
social benefits (recreation). And finally society wants to be
sure that they are available for future generations
(environmental protection and restoration).
The Corps is charged with seeking to achieve the best
possible balance among these competing demands through an
integrated approach to water resources management that focuses
on regional solutions, involving an array of stakeholders (that
is other Government agencies, environmental groups, businesses,
and private organizations). In recent years, the Corps has
implemented this approach largely by concentrating on
watersheds.
OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2010 BUDGET REQUEST
The fiscal year 2010 budget request for the Corps of
Engineers is composed of $5,125,000,000 in new budget
authority. This is an increase of $384,000,000 from the fiscal
year 2009 request. The budget request is $277,000,000 less than
the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount--the narrowest gap in
recent memory. This is the first budget for the Corps of
Engineers by this administration and the Committee sees
definite improvements over the previous administrations
proposals. However, much more needs to be done to truly change
the paradigm under which Corps budgets seems to be produced
within the executive branch.
The Committee believes that the administration should
seriously evaluate the Nation's infrastructure needs and budget
accordingly. At a time when this existing infrastructure, the
foundation of our economic security and quality of life, is
depreciating much faster than it is being recapitalized, when
our increasing population is placing much greater stress on the
Nation's vital water resources, when shifts in population
centers mean new and different problems and when a growing
environmental awareness requires new solutions to persistent
problems, this underfunding is unacceptable and threatens our
continued well-being. Infrastructure budgets have got to be
increased. If not, the Nation will continue to face unscheduled
outages, damaged incomplete infrastructure and other emergency
situations that must be dealt with through ever increasing
emergency appropriations.
This budget proposal again ignores studies and projects
that are ongoing and funded in the Energy and Water section of
the fiscal year 2009 omnibus that was agreed to by the Congress
and signed into law by the President in favor of a select group
of studies and projects that comport to budgetary criteria
devised by the administration without any input from the public
or the Congress. The Committee accepts that it is the
prerogative of the administration to develop whatever criteria
that it sees fit to utilize in order to decide which projects
it will and will not fund. What this Committee does not accept
is that the administration developed criteria is somehow
superior to and should supplant the investment decisions of
Congress.
The Committee agrees with some of the administration's
criteria. The Committee believes it is important to fund the
capability level for dam safety projects. Likewise the
Committee believes that it is a Federal obligation to fund
mitigation and environmental compliance activities. Funding
obligations under continuing contracts and projects that factor
in the consideration of human safety are certainly laudable
criteria for determining which projects to fund.
However, the Committee differs with the administration
concerning benefit to cost ratios being utilized to establish
priority for funding. The Principles and Guidelines utilized by
the Corps require the Chief of Engineers to develop the
National Economic Development [NED] plan for a project. The NED
plan, among other things, is distinguished by the fact that it
provides the greatest excess benefits over the project costs.
This is not the same thing as the highest benefit to cost [B/C]
ratio. It is often the case that the NED plan and the plan with
the highest B/C ratio are not the same plan.
The Flood Control Act of 1936 established that project
benefits should exceed projects costs. This has been the Corps'
longstanding water resource policy and attempts to change this
legislative requirement have been unsuccessful. However, the
administration has arbitrarily decided that benefits simply
exceeding the costs is not a sufficient measure of a project's
worth. They have decided that they will only budget for
projects that have benefit to cost ratios significantly greater
than one to one. Unfortunately the B/C ratio has arbitrarily
changed from year to year in order to accommodate the
administrations desired level of investment.
The criteria for deciding which studies to budget for
appears to be even murkier than the criteria for determining
which construction projects to fund. What is obvious is the
result. Fewer studies are funded every year than are enacted in
the previous appropriation act. These studies provide the
information needed to make vital investments in our water
resources infrastructure. However, they are de-emphasized in
the budget request. One study, albeit an important one,
consumes nearly 50 percent of the resources dedicated to
studies across the country.
As this Committee has noted in the past, planning in the
Corps is a specialized skill set and once that ability is lost,
it is difficult to re-establish. Most of the criticisms of the
Corps' project development process in recent years have
centered on the planning process. The administration is
providing funding for some improvements to the planning program
such as funding the Planning Associates Program and Planning
Centers of Expertise. However, planning studies have to be
undertaken to utilize these improvements. The Committee
believes that the Corps should have a robust planning program
to not only address new water resource needs but to evaluate
changes throughout the project development process. Continued
budgets like this will lead to a complete loss of this vital
Corps of Engineers' competency. The administration should
seriously revise their priorities for this account in the
fiscal year 2011 budget.
The Committee is pleased that the shifting of items from
the Construction, General [CG] account to the Operation and
Maintenance [O&M] account has not been all but abandoned by
this administration. There is still roughly $47,067,000 of
traditionally funded construction items contained in the fiscal
year 2010 O&M account. The Committee believes this was just an
oversight in preparation of the budget. These items are
identified in a table in the section of this report dealing
with the CG account. The budget request is shown in the O&M
account and the funded amounts are included in the CG account.
With these items shifted to their proper accounts, the CG
account total for the budget request would be $1,765,067,000
and the O&M budget request would be $2,456,933,000. This means
that the administration's CG request is down $376,610,000 from
the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount and the O&M account shows a
true increase of $255,033,000 from the fiscal year 2009
enacted. This increase to the O&M account is long overdue as
this account has remained relatively stagnant this decade while
personnel and material costs continue to increase. The
Committee is pleased that the administration did not present
the O&M budget in the ill-conceived regional budget groupings
proposed for the last several years.
The regulatory budget is $190,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.
This is up about $7,000,000 from the fiscal year 2009 enacted
amount. This increase is largely due to the increased workload
from trying to implement regulatory requirements in light of
the unclear Rapanos and SWANCC Supreme Court cases.
The Committee is disappointed that funding for the Formerly
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] was cut by
$6,000,000 from the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount of
$140,000,000. This program was transferred to the Corps from
the Department of Energy, because the Committee was concerned
with management and cost issues of the program within the
Energy Department. This is a program that is being well managed
by the Corps and should have stable, adequate budget resources
to continue these radiological clean-up activities.
The Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account is
proposed at $41,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. These funds are
proposed for Corps readiness and preparedness activities of the
Corps of Engineers.
The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil
Works) is proposed as a separate account for $6,000,000. The
Committee continues to believe that the Assistant Secretary's
office should be funded in the Defense appropriations bill.
However, until such time as that can be reintegrated into that
bill, the Committee agrees that the office should be funded as
a separate account. The Assistant Secretary's duties encompass
much more than the civil works functions of the Corps of
Engineers and the budget needs of the office should be
addressed separately.
The General Expenses [GE] account is proposed at
$184,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. While this is a little less
than the inflation adjusted amount, the Committee is pleased to
see the recognition that the oversight functions of the
headquarters of the Corps should be strengthened. The Committee
notes that the Corps operates one of the most efficient
headquarters staffs in the National Capital region. Only about
3.5 percent of their staffing is at their headquarters level as
opposed to 10 percent or more for comparable agencies in the
National Capital region.
THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA]
was an attempt to combat the recession by putting our citizens
back to work rebuilding our Nation's water resource
infrastructure. The Committee was amazed that the Corps was not
included in the administration's original proposal. The Corps
would have seemed to have been one of the first agencies that
one would go to create jobs. However, after negotiations with
the Congress, the administration agreed that funding for the
Corps would be a component of the ARRA. The Corps was provided
$4,600,000,000 to stimulate job growth by addressing needed
water resource infrastructure needs.
The Recovery Act gave the administration complete
discretion as to which projects would be funded and how much
funding each project would receive. The Congress provided
general guidance expressing Congressional intent as to how the
funds should be utilized. The President signed the ARRA on
February 17, 2009, and by all accounts the Corps had internally
developed a list of projects within about 30 days that met the
Congress' intent of creating jobs across the country while
completing usable increments of projects or providing deferred
maintenance to projects. One of the primary criteria that the
Corps' utilized in their project list was the ability to get
the work underway quickly. After all, the goal was to quickly
create jobs. However, on the eve of releasing this list, the
administration decided to reevaluate the criteria that the
Corps had internally used to develop its' project list. This
review took another 30 days and by all accounts resulted in a
drastically different list than what the Corps originally
proposed--particularly in the CG account. In the Committee's
opinion, this additional administration review did not result
in an improved list. In fact the Committee believes that it
delayed execution of these funds and included projects that
were not ``shovel ready'' but may have had other attributes the
administration found compelling.
The Committee found many of the funding choices made by the
administration questionable. Again the internal criteria for
making these decisions was developed without public input.
Criteria was provided when the ultimate project lists were
released, but some of the logic behind the decisions was
tortured and hard to follow based on a straight reading of the
administration's criteria. The Committee was particularly
disappointed that shore protection projects were deemed
ineligible to receive funding from the ARRA. The Committee see
these projects as being ``shovel ready'' and providing the same
NED benefits to the Nation that any flood damage reduction
project does. The Committee believes they should have been
funded and encourages the administration to use unexpended ARRA
funds for this legitimate Federal purpose.
While the President was celebrating the initiation of the
1,000th transportation project funded by the ARRA, the Corps
project list was still under administrative review. The first
report on expenditures from the Corps was indicative of this
extended review by showing virtually none of the funds expended
more than 75 days after enactment of the ARRA. We are now more
than 4 months after enactment of the ARRA and are still seeing
little progress on getting projects started. This should be
unacceptable to the administration. It certainly is to this
Committee.
PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING
While not calling this a performance-based budget, many of
the same criteria seem to be at play in the decisionmaking
process. The Committee hopes that the administration will try
to work with Congress to try to find a better budget model as
they begin the development process for the fiscal year 2011
budget. It is imperative that the Congress and the executive
branch find common ground on investment decisions for water
resource development if we are to effectively confront the
numerous water resource issues that face the Nation.
The Committee believes that Corps budgets should be
developed from the bottom up, district to division to
headquarters to ASA to OMB. District commanders should be
responsible for developing and managing a program within their
geographic area. Division commanders should be responsible for
integrating the district office programs into a single
division-wide program. The headquarters office should integrate
the division programs into a single national program. The
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army should assure
that the program complies with administration policy and
budgetary guidance and OMB develops the budgetary guidance and
provides funding levels. Decisions for budgeting should be made
within the framework of administration policy by those who know
the projects and programs best, not Washington level
bureaucrats. Unfortunately, if the ARRA is any guide, this will
not be the case.
BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS
As often happens with a change of administrations, the
administration's fiscal year 2010 budget request was delayed
beyond the traditional first Monday in February release. This
is to be expected. The President released his budget outline in
March 2009, with the formal budget documents released on May 7,
2009. Inexplicably, the detailed budget justifications for the
Corps of Engineers were not received until 5 weeks after the
budget was released. The justifications that were provided only
covered the GI, and CG accounts plus the remaining items in
O&M. That means the administration provided no detailed
justification for $2,400,000,000 of the Corps budget. This is
unacceptable. This has now happened twice in the past 4 years.
It is inconceivable to this Committee that DOE with a budget 5
times the size of the Corps can get printed and bound editions
of their budget justification delivered on the day the budget
is released and the Corps cannot even get their justifications
on the Internet for 5 weeks after the budget is released. The
administration should note that this situation will not be
tolerated for the fiscal year 2011 budget. If every other
executive branch agency can produce detailed budget
justifications when the budget is released, the Corps should be
able to also.
The Committee appreciates the traditional layout of the
justifications that were finally delivered. It was especially
good to see that both the Flood Plain Management Services and
Planning Assistance to States GI line items provided a detailed
breakdown of the funding requests for these programs for the
first time ever. Unfortunately, this level of detail was not
included for the Continuing Authorities Program or the Dam
Safety/Seepage Stability Correction Program. The justifications
for these items showed a total dollar value and listed
projects, but neither program justification gives the Committee
an idea of how the program totals were arrived at. There is no
way to know whether the administration proposal underfunds or
overfunds these programs.
The Committee believes that budget justifications serve to
justify the administration's request. The budget justifications
should be improved by providing more relevant budget and
project information. For fiscal year 2011 the Corps is directed
to provide, at a minimum, detailed project information for each
O&M project justifying the needs for each project.
INLAND WATERWAY TRUST FUND
More than 3 years ago, this Committee was made aware of a
pending shortfall in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. It took
the previous administration 2 years from when they first
notified the Committee of the issue to actually submit a
proposal to Congress to address this shortfall. Unfortunately
this proposed lockage fee was developed as a part of the fiscal
year 2009 budget deliberations and, as such, the administration
did not coordinate it with industry. When the proposal was
announced it was loudly criticized by the navigation industry
(who had no input into the proposal) and was largely considered
dead on arrival. Unfortunately, the administration's budget
request assumed revenues from this lockage fee would be
available to fund a portion of their fiscal year 2009 budget
request. This put the Committee in the awkward position of
trying to make the budget work with insufficient funds.
When the fiscal year 2010 budget was presented to Congress,
the budget repeated the proposal to phase out the existing fuel
tax that funds the IWTF and phase in a lockage fee.
Fortunately, the budget was not predicated on this proposal
being enacted. The administration proposal only expends
existing revenues available in the IWTF and deposits assumed
revenues from the lockage fee into the IWTF to be used in
subsequent years. This is a much more prudent way to budget
with these limited funds.
The Committee has supported and continues to support
sharing the cost of construction and major rehabilitations
between the IWTF and the General Treasury in the CG account.
The Committee believes that this arrangement makes the users
active partners in the overall inland waterway system and
provides for a better more efficient system. As the Congress
already pays 100 percent of the O&M costs of the inland
waterway system, the Committee would not support a change in
cost sharing for the IWTF. Even if it did support a cost share
change, this would only prolong the inevitable bankrupting of
the IWTF.
The current fuel tax generates about $90,000,000 annually.
Currently awarded continuing contracts for IWTF projects will
require approximately $60,000,000 of this amount for the next 3
years. The Committee believes that the only way to solve the
problem is to generate additional revenues in the fund. The
current fuel tax is spread relatively equitably across all
commercial users of the inland waterway system. However, the
fuel tax has remained at $0.20 per gallon of diesel fuel since
1996. Inflation and increased efficiency in tow boats has
eroded the value of the fuel tax. One potential solution is to
index the fuel tax to inflation. Another solution would be to
keep the current fuel tax in place but to add a lock user fee
to the revenue stream. This way, all users would pay something
and those that use the locks would pay more. Other potential
solutions that could be considered include a bulk commodity tax
collected from the river terminals, a nationwide marine fuel
tax, or even a national sales tax. A wholesale change from a
fuel tax to a user fee as proposed by the administration
appears to be unacceptable to Congress or the inland waterway
industry. However, the Committee only proffers these as
discussion topics. As waterways are the most efficient mode of
transport any solution to the funding shortfall should not
provide disincentives for using the inland waterways.
Legislative text is again included this year to prohibit
the Corps from entering into any new continuing contracts for
any inland waterway project until the revenue stream for the
IWTF is enhanced. The administration should submit the fiscal
year 2011 budget based on expected revenues in the IWTF not
based on projections based on legislation that may or may not
happen. No change in law has been made nor will this Committee
propose any to alleviate the funding problem in this fund. A
solution to this problem must be developed with the users of
the system, the Corps and the appropriate authorizing
committees of the Congress.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING
The budget for the Corps of Engineers consists of
individual line items of projects. As presented by the
President, the budget contains 969 specific line item requests
for directed spending by the administration. Additional funding
is requested by the administration for nationwide line items.
All of these line items were specific requests by the
administration of the Congress to be funded in fiscal year
2010. They did not request these funds programmatically, they
requested them for a specific project in a specific location
for a specific purpose.
The Committee has returned to its tradition of including
funding for the Corps of Engineers by account in legislative
text and provided the details for each account within the
report that accompanies the legislation. This provides the
agency some flexibility in how funds are expended and allows
the Corps to effectively manage their program while honoring
the intent of Congress. The primary intent of Congress has
always been that once the Congress funded a study, it intended
for the study phase to be completed to determine if Federal
investment is warranted. By the same token, once the Congress
committed to initiation of construction of a project, it
intended for the project to be completed and the national
economy to accrue the project benefits.
CONTINUING CONTRACTS AND REPROGRAMMING
The Committee expects the Chief of Engineers to execute the
Civil Works program generally in accordance with congressional
direction. This includes moving individual projects forward in
accordance with the funds annually appropriated. However, the
Committee realizes that many factors outside the Corps' control
may dictate the progress of any given project or study.
The Committee is retaining the reprogramming guidance for
fiscal year 2010 that was enacted for fiscal year 2009. The
guidance is as follows:
General Investigations.--For a base funding level less than
$100,000, the reprogramming limit is $25,000. For a base level
over $100,000, 25 percent up to a limit of $150,000 per study
or activity. Amounts over this limit will require approval of
the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, except that the
Committee does not object to reprogramming up to $25,000 to any
continuing study or activity that did not receive an
appropriation in the current year.
Construction, General.--For a base less than $2,000,000,
the reprogramming limit is $300,000. For a base level over
$2,000,000, 15 percent up to a limit of $3,000,000 per project
or activity. The Committee will allow reprogramming up to
$3,000,000 for settled contractor claims, accelerated earnings
or real estate deficiency judgments. Amounts over this limit
require approval of the House and Senate Appropriations
Committees. Reprogramming within each section of the Continuing
Authorities is unlimited however, the percentages between
studies and implementation must be maintained as directed in
this report. Further, no reprogramming is allowed between
sections nor into or out of the overall CG account. The
Committee does not object to reprogramming of up to $300,000 to
any continuing project or program that did not receive an
appropriation in the current year.
Operations and Maintenance.--Unlimited reprogramming
authority is granted in order for the Corps to be able to
respond to emergency situations. The Chief of Engineers must
notify the House and Senate Appropriations Committees of these
emergency actions as soon thereafter as practicable. For all
other situations, for a base less than $1,000,000, the
reprogramming limit is $150,000. For a base over $1,000,000, 15
percent up to a limit of $5,000,000 per project or activity.
Amounts over this limit require approval of the House and
Senate Appropriations Committees. The Committee does not object
reprogramming up to $150,000 to any continuing project or
program that did not receive an appropriation in the current
year.
Mississippi River and Tributaries.--The Corps should follow
the same reprogramming guidelines for the GI, CG, and O&M
portions of the Mississippi River and Tributaries account as
listed above.
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.--The Corps
may reprogram up to 15 percent of the base of the receiving
project.
Continuing Authorities Program.--The reprogramming guidance
does not apply to the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP]. The
Corps has unlimited reprogramming within each section of the
CAP but shall not reprogram funding from the CG account to any
section of CAP or between CAP sections.
5-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PLANNING
While the Committee appreciates the Corps' attempts to
provide a meaningful 5-year budget plan, it recognizes the
inherent difficulties between the legislative and executive
branches in preparing a useful plan. The executive branch is
unwilling to project a 5-year horizon for projects for which
they do not budget leaving a sizeable percentage of the Corps
annual appropriations with a year-to-year event horizon for
planning purposes. The fact that a sizeable portion of the
annual appropriations are dedicated to congressional priorities
is not a new phenomenon. Many major public works projects over
the last two centuries have been funded on an annual basis
without a clear budget strategy. The Committee would welcome
the ideas and the opportunity to work with the executive branch
to determine a mutually agreeable way to develop an integrated
5-year comprehensive budget that displays true funding needs
for congressional as well as administration priorities.
Anything less will only give a partial view of the investments
needed in water resources infrastructure.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommendation includes a total of
$5,405,000,000. This is $280,000,000 over the administration's
budget request and $2,635,000 above the fiscal year 2009
enacted amount. Funding is displayed in the following table.
The first column represents the President's budget as
requested, the second column is displayed with the President's
request in the accounts where the projects have been
traditionally located, the third column is the Senate
Recommendation and the final column is the Senate
recommendation versus the President's request in the
traditional account structure. Funding by account is as
follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2010
President's Fiscal year 2010 Senate Request vs.
budget request recommendation recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Investigations.................. $100,000 $100,000 $170,000 $+70,000
Construction, General................... 1,718,000 1,765,067 1,924,000 +158,933
Mississippi River and Tributaries....... 248,000 248,000 340,000 +92,000
Operation and Maintenance............... 2,504,000 2,456,933 2,450,000 -6,933
Regulatory.............................. 190,000 190,000 190,000 ................
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies... 41,000 41,000 ................ -41,000
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action 134,000 134,000 140,000 +6,000
Program................................
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the 6,000 6,000 5,000 -1,000
Army (Civil Works).....................
General Expenses........................ 184,000 184,000 186,000 +2,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................. 5,125,000 5,125,000 5,405,000 +280,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW STARTS
Out of the more than 2,100 requests this Committee received
for Corps projects and studies for fiscal year 2010, 93 were
for new study requests; 163 were for new construction projects.
Of this 163, 92 were for new water and sewer projects for the
Corps. That is an astounding total of 12 percent of the
Committee requests for new studies and projects. This is
demonstrative of the tremendous need for water resource
solutions across the Nation. Neither the administration nor the
Congress is able to find the budget resources to address these
critical needs.
The administration's budget request proposed seven new
construction starts and three new study starts in fiscal year
2010. These new construction starts account for $92,700,000 or
5.4 percent of the CG budget request for fiscal year 2010 and
would require in excess of $800,000,000 in future
appropriations to fund the obligations that would be incurred
by starting these new projects. Starting these projects would
only increase the pressure on the administration next year to
establish budgetary criteria that would exclude more projects
from funding consideration in order to fund these new
priorities.
While the Committee is recommending a boost to the
construction budget that is $158,900,000 above the budget
request, this recommendation is $80,500,000 less than what was
proposed in the Senate bill in fiscal year 2009. Further, the
Committee's CG recommendation is $217,700,000 below the fiscal
year 2009 enacted CG amount. The Committee believes that
recommending new starts in this budget environment would be
imprudent. These new starts would get over the ``new start''
hurdle, only to face a budget that cannot accommodate all of
these needs. One has to ask, is it more prudent to start a
project, or to adequately fund those that have been started?
The Committee has decided that there just are not
sufficient resources to start any new studies or projects in
the fiscal year 2010 bill--either the administration's new
starts or those proposed by Congress. The Committee continues
to believe that new starts are a vital part of the Corps'
program, there just are not sufficient funding resources to
start new obligations at this time. If additional resources
become available in conference, the Committee might re-evaluate
this decision.
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
The Committee received more than 2,000 requests for
projects, programs, studies, or activities for the Corps of
Engineers for fiscal year 2010. These requests included the
budget request as well as requests by Members. The Committee
obviously was unable to accommodate all of these requests.
In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding
provided in the energy and water bill, all disclosures are made
in the report accompanying the bill.
All of the projects funded in this report have gone through
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to
decide what not to fund.
There are two disclosure tables this year. One table
discloses the recommended amounts that are in excess of those
proposed in the budget request and the Members names that made
these requests. If the Member requested the budget request or
if only the budget request was provided, Member names are not
listed next to these items because under the provisions of Rule
44 this would not be considered congressionally directed
spending. The second table discloses only those earmarks
requested by the President and the amount recommended or the
budget request whichever is appropriate.
The purposes for the funding provided in the various
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each
account. The location of the programs, projects, or studies are
denoted in the account tables.
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$168,100,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 100,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 170,000,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $25,000,000.
This appropriation funds studies to determine the need,
engineering feasibility, economic justification, and the
environmental and social suitability of solutions to water and
related land resource problems; and for preconstruction
engineering and design work, data collection, and interagency
coordination and research activities.
The planning program is the entry point for Federal
involvement in solutions to the Nation's water resource
problems and needs. Unfortunately, the General Investigations
[GI] account amount proposed in the budget is only marginally
better that what has been proposed in previous budgets.
Nationwide studies and programs consume almost half of the
administration's GI request. This budget is saying that the
Nation should concentrate scarce resources on completing
studies but not carrying forward ongoing studies. However, the
budget request was able to carve out $700,000 for three new
starts. While this Committee supports new study starts
believing them a vital part of the planning program, the
Committee does not support new starts when so many on-going
studies are unfunded in the budget request.
The Committee has provided for a robust and balanced
planning program for fiscal year 2010. However, no new starts
are included in this recommendation. To provide additional
transparency in the budget process, the Committee has
segregated the budget into three columns in the following
table.
The first column represents the reconnaissance phase of the
planning process. These studies determine if there is a Federal
interest in a water resource problem or need and if there is a
cost sharing sponsor willing to move forward with the study.
The next column represents the feasibility phase of the study.
These detailed cost-shared studies determine the selected
alternative to be recommended to the Congress for construction.
The third column represents the preconstruction engineering and
design phase. These detailed cost-shared designs are prepared
while the project recommended to Congress is awaiting
authorization for construction.
The Committee hopes that by segregating the table in this
manner that more attention will be focused on the various study
phases, and a more balanced planning program will be developed
by the administration. As the last two columns are generally
cost shared, they demonstrate the commitment by cost-sharing
sponsors to be a part of the Federal planning process. By the
same token, it also shows the level of commitment of the
Federal Government to these cost-sharing sponsors. The
Committee directs that the fiscal year 2011 planning budget be
presented to the Committee in this fashion.
The budget request and the recommended Committee allowance
are shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee recommendation
Project title ---------------------------------------------------------------
Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALASKA
HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK................... .............. .......... .......... 340 ..........
KOTZEBUE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK.................. .............. .......... .......... 210 ..........
MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK................... 100 .......... .......... 100 ..........
VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK..................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 385
WHITTIER HARBOR, AK............................. .............. .......... .......... 340 ..........
YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK.............................. 450 .......... .......... 450 ..........
ARIZONA
PIMA COUNTY, AZ................................. 275 .......... .......... 275 ..........
VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ.... .............. 658 .......... .......... 658
ARKANSAS
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR...... .............. .......... .......... 250 ..........
MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR...................... .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR.......................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 425
SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS, AR.......................... .............. .......... .......... 210 ..........
WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO........ .............. .......... .......... 250 ..........
WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR........ .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA..... 900 .......... .......... 900 ..........
CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA................... .............. 950 .......... .......... 950
COYOTE DAM, CA.................................. .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
GRAYSON AND MURDERER'S WALNUT CREEK BASIN, CA... .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
HAMILTON CITY, CA............................... .............. 400 .......... .......... 400
HUMBOLT BAY LONG-TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, CA... .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA..... .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERCOURSE, HEADWORKS, CA... .............. .......... .......... 230 ..........
LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
VICINITY,......................................
LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA......................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 250
MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA..................... .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
MIDDLE CREEK, CA................................ .............. .......... .......... .......... 250
PAJARO RIVER, CA................................ .............. .......... .......... .......... 425
REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA......................... .............. .......... .......... 210 ..........
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA....................... .............. .......... .......... 221 ..........
SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, CA (SYSTEMS .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
EVALU).........................................
SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA.... 468 .......... .......... 468 ..........
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA....................... .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA.................. .............. .......... .......... 340 ..........
SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA...................... .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN [SJRB], FRAZIER CREEK/ .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
STRATHMO.......................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS, .............. .......... .......... 370 ..........
ORESTIMBA CR...................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN .............. .......... .......... 640 ..........
RIVER, CA......................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
CREEK,.........................................
SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA................. .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA.................. 278 .......... .......... 278 ..........
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA............... .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
ST. HELENA-NAPA RIVER, CA....................... .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA........................ .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
SUTTER COUNTY, CA............................... 339 .......... .......... 339 ..........
UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA...................... 386 .......... .......... 386 ..........
WESTMINSTER (EAST GARDEN GROVE) WATERSHED, CA.. .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA............................. .............. .......... .......... 950 ..........
COLORADO
CACHE LA POUDRE, CO............................. .............. .......... .......... 50 ..........
SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO......................... .............. .......... 82 .......... ..........
CONNECTICUT
CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, .............. .......... .......... 380 ..........
NH &...........................................
DELAWARE
RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE.. .............. .......... .......... 264 36
FLORIDA
FLAGER COUNTY, FL............................... .............. .......... .......... 496 ..........
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON NORTH, FL................... 150 .......... .......... 150 ..........
LAKE WORTH INLET, FL............................ .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
LIDO KEY, SARASOTA, FL (SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL). .............. .......... .......... .......... 340
MIAMI HARBOR, FL................................ .............. .......... .......... .......... 510
MILE POINT, FL (JACKSONVILLE)................... .............. .......... .......... 185 ..........
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL...................... 510 .......... .......... 510 ..........
WALTON COUNTY, FL............................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 229
GEORGIA
AUGUSTA, GA..................................... .............. 278 .......... .......... 278
OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, GA... 100 .......... .......... .......... ..........
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA................... .............. 1,000 .......... .......... ..........
SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, GA PH II.... .............. .......... .......... .......... 210
TYBEE ISLAND, GA................................ 206 .......... .......... 206 ..........
GUAM
HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL..................... 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
HAWAII
ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI......................... 175 .......... .......... 408 ..........
KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI. .............. .......... .......... 300 ..........
MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI........................ .............. .......... .......... .......... 202
WAIAKEA-PALAI STREAMS, HI....................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 300
WALILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI....................... .............. .......... .......... 175 ..........
WEST MAUI FEASIBILITY STUDY, HI................. .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
ILLINOIS
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)................ 500 .......... .......... 500 ..........
ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL............ 400 .......... .......... 400 ..........
INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES, MISSISSIPPI 300 .......... .......... 300 ..........
RIVER A........................................
PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL............... .............. .......... .......... .......... 50
PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL........................ .............. .......... .......... 209 255
S. FORK, SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, (BUBBLY .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
CREEK),........................................
UPPER MISS-ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & .............. .......... .......... .......... 9,000
WI.............................................
UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, .............. .......... .......... 640 ..........
MN &...........................................
INDIANA
INDIANA HARBOR, IN.............................. .............. 300 .......... .......... 300
IOWA
CEDAR RIVER TIME CHECK AREA, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA... .............. .......... .......... 750 ..........
HUMBOLT, IA..................................... .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
KANSAS
MANHATTAN, KS................................... .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
TOPEKA, KS...................................... .............. 100 .......... .......... 250
UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS.......................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 170
KENTUCKY
GREEN RIVER WATERSHED, KY....................... 200 .......... .......... .......... ..........
LOUISIANA
BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA........................... .............. 1,239 .......... .......... 1,239
BOSSIER PARISH, LA.............................. .............. .......... .......... 150 ..........
CALCASIEU LOCK, LA.............................. 1,000 .......... .......... 1,000 ..........
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA.................... .............. .......... .......... 675 ..........
CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA....................... .............. .......... .......... 153 ..........
CROSS LAKE, LA.................................. .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA 25,000 .......... .......... 23,000 ..........
LOUISIANA COASTAL PROTECTION & RESTORATION 3,000 .......... .......... 3,000 ..........
[LACPR], LA....................................
PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LA.......................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 107
PORT OF IBERIA, LA.............................. .............. .......... .......... .......... 1,000
ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA...... .............. .......... .......... 391 ..........
SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
PROTECTION, LA.................................
WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA.............. .............. .......... .......... 425 ..........
MARYLAND
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMPREHENSIVE .............. .......... .......... 321 ..........
PLAN, MD.......................................
BALTIMORE METRO WATER RESOURCES--PATAPSCO URBAN .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
RIVER..........................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
MANAGEMENT,....................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT .............. .......... 143 57 ..........
MANAGEME.......................................
EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD.... .............. 250 .......... .......... 483
MIDDLE POTOMAC COMP PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC.... .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED, GREAT SENECA CREEK AND .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
MUDDY..........................................
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
ENVIRO.........................................
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA............. .............. 500 .......... .......... 500
PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA.......... 100 .......... .......... 100 ..........
MICHIGAN
GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, 400 .......... .......... 400 ..........
OH, PA.........................................
GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS [RAP], MI..... .............. .......... .......... 850 ..........
LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI. .............. .......... .......... 215 ..........
MINNESOTA
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, MN................... .............. .......... .......... 215 ..........
MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD........ 350 .......... .......... 350 ..........
WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, 271 .......... .......... 271 ..........
MN.............................................
MISSISSIPPI
PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS....................... .............. .......... .......... 200 ..........
MISSOURI
BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO...................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 242
KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................... 224 .......... .......... 224 ..........
MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS............. 600 .......... .......... 600 ..........
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 & R460-- .............. .......... .......... .......... 340
471, MO........................................
RIVER DES PERES, MO............................. .............. .......... .......... .......... 100
ST. LOUIS, MO (WATERSHED)....................... 400 .......... .......... .......... ..........
MONTANA
YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT.................. 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
NEW HAMPSHIRE
MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA........ 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
NEW JERSEY
DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ................ 290 .......... .......... 290 ..........
HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
NJ.............................................
HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ........... .............. .......... .......... .......... 255
NEW JERSEY SHORE PROECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
INLET..........................................
NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM .............. .......... .......... 110 ..........
NOURISHMENT....................................
PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ..................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 215
PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ..................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 215
PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ......................... .............. .......... .......... 300 ..........
RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ.......................... .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ.. .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ.... .............. .......... .......... .......... 25
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION-BEACH, NJ. .............. .......... .......... .......... 110
SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ............ 511 .......... .......... 511 ..........
SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............ .............. .......... .......... .......... 215
STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ.......... .............. .......... .......... 110 ..........
NEW MEXICO
ESPANOLA VALLEY, NM............................. .............. .......... .......... 150 ..........
RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX................... .............. .......... .......... 120 ..........
SANTA FE, NM.................................... .............. .......... .......... 228 ..........
NEW YORK
BRONX RIVER BASIN, NY........................... .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY........ 100 .......... .......... 100 ..........
HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY.................. 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ................ .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH NY..... 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY......................... .............. .......... .......... 441 ..........
MONTAUK POINT, NY............................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 255
NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED, NY..................... .............. .......... 104 .......... ..........
ONONDAGA LAKE, NY............................... .............. .......... .......... 215 ..........
UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, FLOODPLAIN .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
RECONNECTION...................................
UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, LIVINGSTON .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
MANOR, NY......................................
NEVADA
TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV............................. .............. .......... .......... .......... 10,000
NORTH CAROLINA
BOGUE BANKS, NC................................. .............. .......... .......... 135 ..........
CURRITUCK SOUND, NC............................. 150 .......... .......... 150 ..........
NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC........................... .............. 200 .......... .......... 200
NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC........... .............. .......... 104 170 ..........
SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC........... .............. .......... .......... 17 170
NORTH DAKOTA
MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO...... .............. .......... .......... 5,500 ..........
RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD AND 150 .......... .......... 3,050 ..........
MANITOBA,......................................
OHIO
HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH........... .............. .......... .......... .......... 437
MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH....... .............. .......... .......... .......... 640
WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI........... .............. .......... .......... 340 ..........
OKLAHOMA
GRAND [NEOSHO] RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS .............. .......... .......... 162 ..........
OOLOGAH LAKE WATERSHED, KS AND OK............... .............. .......... .......... 135 ..........
SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK..... .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK......................... .............. .......... .......... 215 ..........
OREGON
AMAZON CREEK, OR................................ .............. .......... .......... 320 ..........
WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA............ 203 .......... .......... 203 ..........
WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR..... .............. .......... .......... 215 ..........
WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR..... .............. 240 .......... .......... 240
PENNSYLVANIA
BLOOMSBURG, PA.................................. .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
DELAWARE RIVER BASIN, PINE KNOT, PA............. .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, .............. .......... 81 85 ..........
DE &...........................................
SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON, PA......... .............. .......... .......... 214 ..........
UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA................. .............. .......... .......... 1,700 ..........
SOUTH CAROLINA
EDISTO ISLAND, SC............................... 167 .......... .......... 167 ..........
REEDY RIVER, SC................................. .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
SOUTH DAKOTA
JAMES RIVER, SD & ND............................ .............. .......... .......... 200 ..........
WATERTOWN AND VICINITY, SD...................... .............. .......... .......... .......... 448
TENNESSEE
MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN....... 50 .......... .......... 50 ..........
TEXAS
ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN--ELM CREEK)..... .............. .......... .......... 190 ..........
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX.. 526 .......... .......... 526 ..........
DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX.. .............. .......... .......... 2,125 ..........
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX............................. 675 .......... .......... 675 ..........
GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
TX.............................................
GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX...... 423 .......... .......... 423 ..........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX.................. 425 .......... .......... 425 ..........
NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX................ 250 .......... .......... 250 ..........
RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX............................ 304 .......... .......... 304 ..........
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX...................... .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX................ 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX....... .............. .......... .......... 143 ..........
VERMONT
MONTPELIER, VT.................................. .............. .......... .......... 239 ..........
VIRGINIA
CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA...................... .............. .......... .......... 130 ..........
CHOWAN RIVER BASIN, VA.......................... .............. .......... .......... 215 ..........
DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA......... .............. .......... .......... 78 ..........
FOUR MILE RUN, VA............................... .............. .......... .......... 100 ..........
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA............... .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SECTION 300 .......... .......... 300 ..........
216)...........................................
LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA....................... 112 .......... .......... 112 ..........
NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA..................... .............. .......... .......... 90 ..........
UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II)......... .............. .......... .......... 170 ..........
VICINITY OF WILLOUGHBY SPIT, VA................. .............. .......... .......... 243 ..........
WASHINGTON
CENTRALIA, WA................................... .............. .......... .......... 1,000 ..........
CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA........................ .............. .......... .......... 1,000 ..........
ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, WA......................... .............. .......... .......... 255 ..........
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA & 300 .......... .......... 300 ..........
OR.............................................
PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT 400 .......... .......... 400 ..........
RESTORATION, WA................................
PUYALLUP RIVER, WA.............................. 250 .......... .......... 250 ..........
SKAGIT RIVER, WA................................ .............. .......... .......... 550 ..........
SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA....................... .............. .......... .......... 300 ..........
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA... .............. .......... .......... .......... 130
WEST VIRGINIA
CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV.......................... .............. .......... .......... 600 ..........
OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, .............. .......... .......... 2,000 ..........
OH, PA.........................................
UPPER GUYANDOTTE, WV............................ .............. .......... .......... 300 ..........
WELLS LOCK AND DAM, LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV .............. .......... .......... 40 ..........
(LITTLE K).....................................
---------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS..................... 44,468 6,115 514 85,028 32,439
NATIONAL PROGRAMS
COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES........ .............. .......... .......... .......... ..........
ACCESS TO WATER DATA (TECH ASSIST).............. 750 .......... .......... 750 ..........
COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS...... 100 .......... .......... 100 ..........
OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS..................... 4,330 .......... .......... 4,730 ..........
LAKE TAHOE...................................... (100) .......... .......... (500) ..........
PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES: 7,000 .......... .......... 8,051 ..........
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, AZ... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA..................... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
CITY OF PALMDALE, CA........................ (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA...................... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
SAN BERNADINO COUNTY, CA.................... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
SAN MANUEL BAND OF INDIANS, CA.............. (66) .......... .......... (66) ..........
SOBOBA BAND OF INDIANS, CA.................. (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
WEST CANAL/WILLOW BROOK FLOOD MANAGEMENT STU (20) .......... .......... (20) ..........
DELAWARE ESTUARY SALINITY MONITORING STUDY,. .............. .......... .......... (200) ..........
SOUTH BETHANY TIDAL PUMP SYSTEM STUDY, DE... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
EFFINGHAM COUNTY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (60) .......... .......... (60) ..........
NORTHWEST GA WATERSHEAD, GA................. (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
HAWAII DOT GIS, HI.......................... .............. .......... .......... (100) ..........
HAWAII WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, HI....... .............. .......... .......... (270) ..........
RAINFALL ATLAS OF HAWAII, STATE OF HAWAII .............. .......... .......... (100) ..........
AN.........................................
WAIMANALO WASTEWATER EFFLUENT REUSE PLAN, ST .............. .......... .......... (67) ..........
STATE OF HAWAII GENERAL FLOOD CONTROL PLAN U .............. .......... .......... (1,000) ..........
BOYER RIVER, MISSOURI VALLEY, IA............ .............. .......... .......... (36) ..........
NISHNABOTNA WATERSHED, IA................... (341) .......... .......... (200) ..........
WILLOW CREEK, IA............................ (45) .......... .......... (45) ..........
BIG WOOD RIVER--BELVUE...................... .............. .......... .......... .......... ..........
IDAHO, ID................................... (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
WEISER R. FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS, ID........... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
LAKE COUNTY WETLANDS RESTORATION, IL........ .............. .......... .......... (200) ..........
KS RIVER WATER RESOURCES, KS................ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
PAS TRIBAL SUPPORT, KS...................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
BARDSTOWN, KY............................... (88) .......... .......... (88) ..........
LOUISVILLE PARKS, KY........................ (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
CHITIMACHA WATERSHED PLANNING, LA........... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
NEW ORLEANS RIVER PARK, LA.................. (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
PORT OF LAKE CHARLES MASTER PLAN, LA........ (125) .......... .......... (125) ..........
RIVER PARISHES PEDESTRIAN PLAN, LA.......... (125) .......... .......... (125) ..........
ST. JOHNS PARISH MONUMENTATION, LA.......... (125) .......... .......... (125) ..........
TUNICA RECREATION TRAIL, TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE (125) .......... .......... (125) ..........
PENN'S HILL DRAINAGE STUDY, QUINCY, MA...... (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
TOWN LINE BROOK DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT, MALDEN, (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD....................... (20) .......... .......... (20) ..........
MACOMB COUNTY DRAIN MAPPING & DATABASE, MI.. (200) .......... .......... (200) ..........
STREAM CHARACTERISTICS STUDY FOR SAGANING RI (80) .......... .......... (80) ..........
CHOCTAW COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS................ .............. .......... .......... (100) ..........
CAPE GIRARDEAU GROUNDWATER STUDY, MO........ (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
CITY OF MARQUAND FLOOD STUDY, MO............ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
PAS MO MDNR NORTHWEST MISSOURI, MO.......... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
PERUQUE CREEK WATER QUALITY, MO............. (30) .......... .......... (30) ..........
ST. CHARLES RIVERFRONT MICRO-MODEL, MO...... (90) .......... .......... (90) ..........
HENRY R. DAM, BURKE, CO., NC................ (48) .......... .......... (48) ..........
GOOCHS MILLL, GRNADVILLE, CO., NC........... (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
FONTENELLE/BELLEVUE, NE..................... (40) .......... .......... (40) ..........
SPICKET RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH........... (55) .......... .......... (55) ..........
GRANTS DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN, NM......... (56) .......... .......... (56) ..........
TARRYTOWN, NY............................... (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
TOWN OF CLARENCE, NY........................ (80) .......... .......... (80) ..........
WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY........................ (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
HARPERSFIELD DAM, GRAND RIVER, OH........... (88) .......... .......... (88) ..........
STATE OF OHIO GIS, OH....................... (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
OKLAHOMA COMP WATER PLAN, OK................ .............. .......... .......... (500) ..........
PAS BOONE NUTE SLOUGH, OR................... (27) .......... .......... (27) ..........
PAS CITY OF MEDFORD FLOODPLAIN, OR.......... (60) .......... .......... (60) ..........
PAS NEHALEM RIVER ODOT FLOOD MAPPING, OR... (200) .......... .......... (200) ..........
PAS PORTLAND BALANCED CUT AND FILL STUDY, OR (35) .......... .......... (35) ..........
PAS TOUTLE RIVER RADIO TRACKING, OR......... (30) .......... .......... (30) ..........
ALLEGHENY CO AQUATIC ASSESSMENT STUDY, PA... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
NORTHERN ALLEGHENY CO STORMWATER MANGT STUDY (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING, PA... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SW PA SPILL RESPONSE STUDY, PA.............. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
USS YORKTOWN, SC............................ (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
KINGSPORT RIVERFRONT, TN.................... (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
TN DEPT OF ENV AND CONSERV PILOT STUDY--WTR. (200) .......... .......... (200) ..........
CHARLOTTESVILLE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT, VA (40) .......... .......... (40) ..........
JAMES CITY SURRY NON-STRUCTURAL, VA......... (35) .......... .......... (35) ..........
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COASTAL COMM .............. .......... .......... (220) ..........
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, VA.. (114) .......... .......... (114) ..........
WILLIAMSBURG STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, VA..... (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT........................ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
CLOVER ISLAND--PORT OF KENEWICK, WA......... (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
ELWHA RIVER, WA............................. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
HALF MOON LAKE ALUM DOSING STUDY, WI........ (30) .......... .......... (30) ..........
INTERNAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING ASSESSMENT STUDY (31) .......... .......... (31) ..........
ONEIDA NATION FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION, WI.... (250) .......... .......... (250) ..........
CITY OF RAVENWOOD, WV....................... (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
PUTNAM COUNTY DRAINAGE, WV.................. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA
AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRI-CADD.. 350 .......... .......... 350 ..........
COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION................... 1,400 .......... .......... 6,000 ..........
COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM............ .............. .......... .......... (1,000) ..........
PACIFIC ISLAND LAND OCEAN TYPHOON EXPERIMENT .............. .......... .......... (1,000) ..........
SURGE AND WAVE ISLAND MODELING STUDIES, HI.. .............. .......... .......... (1,250) ..........
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES.................. 75 .......... .......... 75 ..........
FLOOD DAMAGE DATA............................... 220 .......... .......... 220 ..........
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES................. 8,000 .......... .......... 13,200 ..........
MOBILE DISTRICT HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
SPECIAL STUDY--CROWDABOUT CREEK, AL......... (81) .......... .......... (81) ..........
SS--SFHE MONTGOMERY AL, LITTLE SANDY CREEK,. (40) .......... .......... (40) ..........
SS--BEAVER/CLEAR CREEKS, CAMP VERDE, AZ..... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS--COCHISE COUNTY, AZ...................... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS--GILA RIVER/DUNCAN, AZ................... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS--HOPI TRIBE FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, AZ....... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS--TOHONO O'ODHAM GU VO WASH, AZ........... (95) .......... .......... (95) ..........
SS--TOHONO O'ODHAM NATIONWIDE FLOOD- PLAIN. (250) .......... .......... (250) ..........
HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CA TSUNAMI PAS, CA......... (500) .......... .......... (500) ..........
RAYMOND BASIN CONJUNCTIVE USE DROUGHT STUDY. (125) .......... .......... (125) ..........
SAN MATEO COUNTY, CA LEVEE SURVEY, CA....... (30) .......... .......... (30) ..........
SS--ANAVERDE CREEK FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION,.. (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS--SOBOBA BAND OF INDIANS FLOOD MAPPING,... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
CARBON COUNTY, CO........................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
DURANGO, LAPLATA COUNTY, CO................. (60) .......... .......... (60) ..........
GREEN RIVER CITY, CO........................ (80) .......... .......... (80) ..........
LA PLATA COUNTY, CO......................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
MESA COUNTY, CO............................. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
FLOOD/HURRICANE EVACUATION, DC.............. (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
WHITE CLAY CREEK, NEW CASTLE, DE............ .............. .......... .......... (200) ..........
SAVANNAH DISTRICT HURRICANE EVAC STUDIES, G. (40) .......... .......... (40) ..........
SS--GA CLARKSVILLE STREAM SURVEY, GA........ (20) .......... .......... (20) ..........
ANAHOLA FLOOD HAZARD STUDY, KAUAI, HI....... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
HAWAII TECHNICAL SERVICES, HI............... .............. .......... .......... (40) ..........
HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, HAWAII........
.............. .......... .......... (1,000) ..........
KALUANUI STREAM FLOOD HAZARD DETERMINATION,. (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
NUUANU RESERVOIR FLOOD STUDY, HI............ (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
WAIMEA RIVER ZONE A FLOOD DETERMINATION, KA. (185) .......... .......... (185) ..........
WAIOHULI GULCH FLOOD HAZARD STUDY, KULA, MA. (200) .......... .......... (200) ..........
IOWA MULTI-STATE DAM SAFETY ANALYSES, IA.... .............. .......... .......... (37) ..........
LITTLE SIOUX WATERSHED, IA.................. .............. .......... .......... (50) ..........
MON-MAQ DAM REMOVAL STUDY & LOCAL FLOODPLAIN .............. .......... .......... (120) ..........
SS--EVALUATION OF FLOODING SCENARIOS, IA.... (120) .......... .......... (120) ..........
SS--REGULATED FREQUENCY CURVES.............. (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
SS BOULDER CREEK DONNELLY, ID............... (35) .......... .......... (35) ..........
SS WARM SPRINGS CREEK VIC OF CHALLIS, ID.... (38) .......... .......... (38) ..........
SS WARM SPRINGS CREEK VIC OF KETCHUM, ID... (45) .......... .......... (45) ..........
SS--IL LEVEES EVALUATION SUPPORT, IL........ (250) .......... .......... (250) ..........
WILL COUNTY SURVEY, IL...................... (400) .......... .......... (400) ..........
NODAWAY COUNTY BRIDGE STUDY, KS............. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LA, [GIS]............... .............. .......... .......... (250) ..........
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, LA [GIS]................ .............. .......... .......... (200) ..........
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [GIS]........... .............. .......... .......... (1,200) ..........
HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDY, SE LOUISIANA UP. (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [GIS]................. .............. .......... .......... (350) ..........
SS--CITY OF GRETNA GIS, LA.................. (200) .......... .......... (200) ..........
SS--EAST BATON ROUGE GIS, LA................ (450) .......... .......... (450) ..........
SS--LIVINGSTON PARISH GIS, LA............... (650) .......... .......... (650) ..........
CLAY PIT BROOK FLOODING STUDY, MA........... (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
HOOSIC RIVER FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY, CHESHI. (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
SAW MILL BROOK FLOOD STUDY, NEWTON, MA...... (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
SPEAR BROOK FLOOD CONTROL STUDY, WILBRAHAM,. (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, MD............ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
AUTRAIN RIVER SCOUR STUDY, MI............... (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT TRAINING, MO.......... (30) .......... .......... (30) ..........
SS--LINCOLN COUNTY, MO...................... (150) .......... .......... (150) ..........
JORDAN, MT.................................. (80) .......... .......... (80) ..........
NASHUA FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT, MT............ (55) .......... .......... (55) ..........
NORTH CAROLINA HES RESTUDY, NC.............. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
BEAVER & BLACK BROOKS FLOODING STUDY, LOND.. (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
FLOODPLAIN MAPS FOR MANALAPAN AND MATCHAPON. .............. .......... .......... (500) ..........
SS--MANALAPAN BROOK, NJ..................... (110) .......... .......... (110) ..........
ELBOW CREEK, NY............................. (60) .......... .......... (60) ..........
FORECAST STUDIES, NY........................ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, NY............ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
ONONDAGA CREEK, SYRACUSE, NY................ (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SPECIAL STUDY--FINGER LAKES, NY............. (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
NEW JERSEY--PORT AUTHORITY STUDY UPDATE, N.. (180) .......... .......... (180) ..........
SPECIAL STUDY--CRAWFORD COUNTY, OH.......... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS CITY OF JOHN DAY, OR..................... (160) .......... .......... (160) ..........
SS CROOKED RIVER FIS (CITY OF PRINEVILLE),.. (140) .......... .......... (140) ..........
SS JUNIPER CANYON FIS (CITY OF PRINEVILLE),. (137) .......... .......... (137) ..........
SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #1 (GRAY'S RIVER), OR... (155) .......... .......... (155) ..........
SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #2 (ELOCHOMAN RIVER), OR (130) .......... .......... (130) ..........
SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #3 (WILSON CREEK), OR.. (128) .......... .......... (128) ..........
SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #4 (SKAMOKAWA CREEK), OR (128) .......... .......... (128) ..........
PHILADELPHIA HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDY, P.. (10) .......... .......... (10) ..........
SOUTHEASTERN, PA............................ (250) .......... .......... (250) ..........
PUERTO RICO HES BEHAVIOR STUDY, PR.......... (112) .......... .......... (112) ..........
SOUTH CAROLINA HES RESTUDY, SC.............. (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
SS--CITY OF GALLATIN, TN.................... (85) .......... .......... (85) ..........
UNINCORPARATED WEBER CO., UT................ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
CITY OF GALAX, VA........................... (100) .......... .......... (100) ..........
SS--TOWN OF ABINGDON, VA.................... (56) .......... .......... (56) ..........
DAM BREAK STUDIES, VT....................... (31) .......... .......... (31) ..........
EAST LONG POND DAM, VT...................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
LAKE HARDWICK DAM, VT....................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
MACKVILLE POND DAM, VT...................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
NICHOLS POND DAM, VT........................ (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
RUGG BROOKS, ST. ALBANS CITY, VT............ (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
SS--STEVENS BROOKS, TOWN OF ST. ALBANS, VT.. (75) .......... .......... (75) ..........
SS--VERMONT, VT............................. (25) .......... .......... (25) ..........
WARREN LAKE DAM, VT......................... (50) .......... .......... (50) ..........
SS LIND COULEE, VICINITY OF LIND, WA........ (35) .......... .......... (35) ..........
SS MCCOY CREEK, VICINITY OF OAKESDALE, WA.. (67) .......... .......... (67) ..........
BEAR RIVER STUDY--UINTA CO., WY............. (140) .......... .......... (140) ..........
HYDROLOGIC STUDIES.............................. 250 .......... .......... 250 ..........
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES..................... 200 .......... .......... 200 ..........
PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE) 225 .......... .......... 225 ..........
REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM 150 .......... .......... 150 ..........
SUPPORT........................................
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS.... 50 .......... .......... 50 ..........
STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY).......... 600 .......... .......... 600 ..........
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.......................... 350 .......... .......... 350 ..........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........................ 16,892 .......... .......... 25,392 ..........
SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION, MD............ .............. .......... .......... (1,000) ..........
URBAN FLOOD DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, DRI, NV.. .............. .......... .......... (2,500) ..........
OTHER--MISC
FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT........................... 2,000 .......... .......... 2,000 ..........
INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW......................... 1,000 .......... .......... 1,000 ..........
NATIONAL SHORELINE.............................. 375 .......... .......... 750 ..........
PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM........................ 2,100 .......... .......... 2,100 ..........
TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM...................... 1,000 .......... .......... 1,000 ..........
WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY................ 2,000 .......... .......... .......... ..........
---------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL PROGRAMS............... 49,417 .......... .......... 69,223 ..........
---------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL..................................... 93,885 6,115 514 154,251 32,439
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE............................ .............. .......... .......... -17,224 ..........
---------------------------------------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL............................... 100,000 .......... .......... 170,000 ..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Harbor Modification, Alaska.--The Committee
recommends $340,000 to continue feasibility studies. A new
harbor basin would not only reduce existing overcapacity and
congestion, but would also enable Port and Harbor of Homer to
accommodate the growth in the use of Homer by the commercial
fleet.
Valdez Harbor Expansion, Alaska.--The Committee
recommendation includes $385,000 for preconstruction
engineering and design studies. Rafting during the commercial
fishing season has been reported up to eight boats deep on a
regular basis. The problem is highly seasonal, requiring a
large need for transient space primarily during the summer
months.
Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study,
California.--The Committee recommends $425,000 for this
feasibility study. The State of California has requested that
the Corps update the original Sacramento-San Joaquin Basin
Comprehensive Study. These studies will be muted to prepare a
comprehensive system approach to flood management for the
Central Valley.
Riverside County SAMP and San Diego County SAMP,
California.--The Committee recommendation includes funding to
complete these Special Area Management Plans. The SAMPs will
result in a streamlined section 404 process, which will
generate general and individual permits.
West Sacramento, California.--The Committee recommendation
includes $950,000 to continue the general re-evaluation of the
levee system.
Red Clay Creek, Christina River Watershed, Delaware.--The
Committee recommends $264,000 for the final screening of
alternatives, selection of recommended plan of improvement,
preparation of draft EA, and completion of draft feasibility
report, $36,000 is recommended to initiate preconstruction
engineering and design.
Miami Harbor Channel, Florida.--The Committee
recommendation includes $510,000 to continue studies of the
harbor deepening.
Walton County, Florida.--The Committee recommendation
includes $229,000 to initiate preconstruction engineering and
design activities. This project is a test bed for the Institute
of Water Resources Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction model.
Ocmulgee River Basin Watershed Management, Georgia.--The
Committee has recommended no funding for this administration
new study start.
Savannah Harbor Expansion, Georgia.--The Committee
recommendation has included funds for this project under the
Construction General Heading. The Construction Phase was
initiated in the fiscal year 2009 Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Act.
Prairie Dupont Levee, Illinois.--The Committee recommends
$209,000 for the feasibility study to assess the potential for
reconstruction of deteriorated features such as gates and
culverts. The recommendation also includes $255,000 for the
deficiency correction preconstruction engineering and design
studies to investigate solutions such as rehabilitation/
replacement of existing relief wells and the construction of
additional relief wells.
Upper Mississippi River--Illinois Waterway Navigation
System, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.--
The Committee recommendation includes $9,000,000 for
continuation of preconstruction engineering and design studies.
The Committee recognizes the need to modernize this more than
60-year-old navigation system and has provided continued
funding for both structural design and environmental
restoration work.
Green River Watershed, Kentucky.--The Committee has
recommended no funding for this new study star proposed by the
administration.
Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.--
The Committee recommends $23,000,000 for these important
studies. The Committee notes that the Science activities are
included within the overall line item rather than being
budgeted separately.
The reduction made to these studies should not be viewed as
any diminution of support for these efforts, rather it is an
attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide
program among the various missions of the Corps.
Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Project
[LACPR], Louisiana.--The Committee recommendation includes
$3,000,000 to refine and integrate LACPR findings and outputs
regarding alternative trade-offs, and coastal landscape
contributions to risk management, with ongoing Hurricane Storm
Damage Reduction projects and Coastal Protection and
Restoration projects and to delineate comprehensive plans for
higher levels of storm surge risk reduction.
Chesapeake Bay, Susquehanna Reservoir Sediment Management,
Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.--It has been estimated
that 280 million tons of sediment originating from the
Susquehanna River watershed are trapped behind the four
hydroelectric dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River
between Havre de Grace, Maryland, and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Three of the four dams Holtwood, Safe Harbor, and York Haven
have reached steady state. It is estimated that the Conowingo
Dam will cease to have trapping capacity in 15 to 20 years.
Once this last reservoir reaches steady state, the sediment
input to the bay may increase dramatically. The Committee
recommendation includes $143,000 to complete the reconnaissance
study to examine the impact of the Lower Susquehanna River Dams
on sediment transport into the Bay and $57,000 to initiate
feasibility studies.
St. Louis Watershed, Missouri.--The Committee has
recommended no funding for this new study star proposed by the
administration.
Upper Delaware River Watershed, Livingston Manor, New
York.--The Committee recommendation includes $170,000 to
continue flood control studies along the Delaware River.
Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota, North Dakota,
South Dakota and Manitoba.--The Committee recommendation
includes $3,050,000 to continue various flood damage reduction
studies in North Dakota and Minnesota. In the Fargo, North
Dakota/Moorhead, Minnesota area alone the Red River has
exceeded flood stage in 51 of the past 107 years and every year
from 1993 through 2009. Studies are ongoing under this
authority in the Fargo-Moorhead Metro area, Pembina, North
Dakota, the Fargo upstream area and additional studies of the
Sheyenne River will be undertaken to evaluate solutions to the
2009 spring flood.
James River, South Dakota and North Dakota.--The Committee
has recommended $200,000 to evaluate solutions to flooding
conditions in the James River Basin due to the spring 2009
flood.
Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Virginia.--The Committee
recommendation includes $255,000 to initiate feasibility
studies to address several problems articulated by the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Game
and Inland Fisheries including benthic impairments, low
dissolved oxygen concentrations, elevated nutrient levels, and
cold and warm water fisheries in the James River below the
lake.
Vicinity of Willoughby Spit, Norfolk, Virginia.--The
Committee recommends $243,000 to complete the General
Reevaluation Study.
Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, Washington.--The
Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000 to continue
preconstruction engineering and design efforts to reduce the
risk of flooding to the Interstate 5 corridor. Significant
flooding in 2007 and 2009 resulted in heavy damages to urban
and rural areas of the Chehalis Basin and closed I-5 for a
total of 6 days.
Chehalis River Basin, Washington.--The Committee recommends
$1,000,000 for plan formulation for a Feasibility decision
document, conduct a Feasibility Scoping meeting and initiate
the alternatives analysis for ecosystem and flood risk
management studies. It is the Committee's understanding that
Grays Harbor has recently indicated they would like to pursue
increasing the scope of the study to include flood risk
management.
Planning Assistance to States.--The Committee
recommendation includes $8,051,000 for this nationwide cost-
shared program. The Committee recognizes that there are
hundreds of these studies on-going at any given time. The
Committee has provided a listing in the table of projects that
should be given priority if cost-sharing funds are available
from the local sponsors. However, the Corps should view these
amounts as guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move
these studies forward as rapidly as possible.
Coastal Field Data Collection.--The Committee has
recommended $6,000,000 for this nationwide program. In addition
to budgeted funds of $1,400,000, $4,600,000 has been
recommended to continue the Coastal Data Information Program;
Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, Hawaii; and the Pacific
Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment Program. The Wave Data
Study should also be continued within this overall funding
amount. The Committee has included a portion of the climate
change funding from the O&M account to this line item to ensure
that this data collection effort continues. As a majority of
our population lives within 50 miles of the coast it is prudent
to invest in these data collection activities to be able to
evaluate how sea level rise will affect all of our coastal
areas. Recent studies have shown, for instance, that sea level
rise will affect the Atlantic Coast unequally with the
Chesapeake Bay area being impacted more than the northern and
southern portions of the Atlantic Coast. However, the Atlantic
and Gulf Coasts of 2100 will likely look much different than
they do today.
The Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States
Report (www.globalchange.gov/usimpacts) released by the White
House in May 2009 shows the impacts to our coastal environments
if even a moderate sea level rise of 2-4 feet occurs over the
next 100 years. Planning needs to be accelerated to determine
how sea level rise will be accommodated. This may involve an
orderly retreat from some of the lowest areas of the coast over
a period of years. Coastal protection projects will continue to
be vital to protecting our population, but the policy question
that must be answered is should all of our coastal areas be
protected and at what cost.
Flood Plain Management Services Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $13,200,000. The Committee has provided
a listing in the table of projects that should be given
priority if cost sharing funds are available from the local
sponsors. However, the Corps should view these amounts as
guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move these studies
forward as rapidly as possible.
Research and Development.--The Committee has recommended
$25,392,000 for the Corps nationwide research and development
programs. The Committee believes that this is an important area
of the Corps' program that should be supported and has
recommended $5,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee
believes that some of this additional funding should be applied
to climate change research to be conducted in concert with the
Coastal Data Information Program. The Committee has also
recommended $1,000,000 to continue submerged aquatic vegetation
research in the Chesapeake Bay and $2,500,000 to continue the
Urban Flood Demonstration Program in cooperation with the
Desert Research Institute.
National Shoreline Study.--The Committee recommends an
additional $375,000 for the national Planning Center of
Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage Reduction for continuing to
develop a process for managing shore protection projects as
part of a systems approach to coastal protection for the
purpose of achieving improved project performance, increased
cost effectiveness, and enhanced benefits.
Water Resources Priorities Study.--No funds are provided
for this new study start proposed by the administration.
CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $2,141,677,000
Budget estimate, 2009\1\................................ 1,718,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,924,000,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $4,835,000,000.
This appropriation includes funds for construction, major
rehabilitation and related activities for water resources
development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage
reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental
restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. The
construction and major rehabilitation for designated projects
for inland and costal waterways will derive one-half of the
funding from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Funds to be
derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund will be applied
to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities Program.
The Administration's budget request proposes funding for
most of the construction items in the CG account. However,
there were a few oversights that the Committee found within the
O&M account and have chosen to fund those items under CG. The
budget request for these items is displayed in the O&M account
as requested by the Administration. These items are listed
below.
When accounting for these items in the traditional
accounts, the President's CG budget request is actually
$1,765,067,000 rather than $1,718,000,000 as shown above. The
projects moved from the O&M request include:
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assategue, MD......................................... 1,000
Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, NJ............ 400
Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ.................. 200
Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes 350
Beach, DE............................................
Section 111 Program................................... 9,043
Poplar Island, MD..................................... 8,200
Dredged Material Disposal Facilities.................. 5,199
Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), IN....... 13,500
Section 204/145....................................... 9,175
-----------------
TOTAL, Projects Migrating from Construction to 47,067
O&M............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The projects that are included in the line item above for
the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities are listed in the CG
table.
Due to constrained funding, the Committee reduced the
requested amounts for some administration projects. This should
not be perceived as a lack of support for any of these
projects, rather it is an attempt by the Committee to balance
out the program across the Nation and fund most of the projects
or studies that were funded in fiscal year 2009 but were not
addressed by the administration proposal.
Even with a $280,000,000 increase to the Corps' accounts,
the Committee is unable to address all of the needs. The CG
account is down by $80,500,000 from the fiscal year 2009 Senate
proposal. By the Committee's estimate, less than 60 percent of
the needed funding is available for this account. Construction
schedules will slip due to this constrained funding. This will
result in deferred benefits to the national economy. The
Committee does not believe that there is any way to prioritize
the projects to alleviate this problem without serious
unintended consequences. Adequate resources have been denied
for too long. Only providing adequate resources for these
national investments will resolve this situation.
The Committee deleted the new construction starts requested
by the Administration as sufficient funding does not exist in
the current budget nor is there reasonable assurance that
sufficient funds will be available in the future to accommodate
these new items as well as ongoing work.
The appropriation provides funds for the Continuing
Authorities Program (projects which do not require specific
authorizing legislation), which includes projects for flood
control (section 205), emergency streambank and shoreline
protection (section 14), beach erosion control (section 103),
mitigation of shore damages (section 111), navigation projects
(section 107), snagging and clearing (section 208), aquatic
ecosystem restoration (section 206), beneficial uses of dredged
material (section 204), and project modifications for
improvement of the environment (section 1135).
The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are
shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget estimate recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
TUSCALOOSA, AL........................ ............... 10,000
ALASKA
ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK............ ............... 2,000
ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK................... 3,000 3,000
UNALASKA, AK.......................... ............... 2,000
ARKANSAS
RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LA, AR & ............... 2,000
TX...................................
RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, ............... 2,000
AR & TX..............................
CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON 6,700 6,700
FEATURES), CA........................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM 66,700 66,700
MODIFICATIONS), C....................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM 600 600
RAISE), CA...........................
CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA.... ............... 5,000
CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA................ ............... 500
FARMINGTON RECHARGE, CA............... ............... 1,000
GUADALUPE RIVER, CA................... ............... 304
HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS 14,250 14,250
RESTORATION, CA......................
KAWEAH RIVER, CA...................... 640 640
LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL 885 885
DEEPENING, CA........................
MID VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, ............... 2,000
CA...................................
MURRIETA CREEK, CA.................... ............... 2,000
NAPA RIVER, CA........................ 5,000 1,000
NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA. 6,750 ...............
OAKLAND HARBOR (50-FOOT PROJECT), CA.. 1,000 1,000
PLACER COUNTY, CA..................... ............... 2,000
SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA. 10,000 10,000
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION 15,000 15,000
PROJECT, CA..........................
SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA ............... 500
IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA..............
SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA................ ............... 2,500
SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA.......... 52,193 52,193
SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA... 2,500 2,500
SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (DAM SAFETY), 10,000 10,000
CA...................................
TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA........... ............... 3,000
UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA............. ............... 2,000
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA................... 2,955 ...............
YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA.................. ............... 2,000
DELAWARE
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT ............... 350
INLET TO LEWES BEACH.................
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE......... ............... 390
DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HELOPEN TO ............... 1,750
FENWICK ISLAND, BE...................
DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HENLOPEN TO ............... 2,000
FENWICK ISLAND, R....................
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WASHINGTON, DC & VICINITY............. 6,790 ...............
FLORIDA
BREVARD COUNTY, FL (MID AND SOUTH ............... 500
REACHES).............................
CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL........ 5,565 5,565
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE 130,000 130,000
CONTROL).............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... ............... 950
LEE COUNTY, FL........................ ............... 1,400
MARTIN COUNTY, FL..................... 350 350
PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL............... ............... 500
PINELLAS COUNTY, FL................... 6,000 6,000
SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM 214,357 163,402
RESTORATION, FL......................
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL.. (163,771) (117,004)
EVERGLADES AND S. FLORIDA (1,725) (1,725)
ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION,...........
KISSIMMEE RIVER, FL............... (44,673) (44,673)
MODIFIED WATER DELIVERIES, FL..... (4,188) ...............
TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... ............... 500
GEORGIA
ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ............... 1,000
GA...................................
RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & 1,615 1,615
SC...................................
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA................... ............... 1,000
HAWAII
IAO STREAMS, HI....................... ............... 250
HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI........... ............... 2,000
KAHUKU, HI............................ ............... 4,360
IDAHO
RURAL IDAHO........................... ............... 2,000
ILLINOIS
ALTON TO GALE LEVEE DISTRICT, IL & MO 300 300
(DEF CORR)...........................
CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI 6,500 6,500
RIVER, IL (DEF CORR).................
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, 5,000 5,000
DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................
CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL................. ............... 3,500
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL................. 3,300 6,800
EAST ST LOUIS, IL..................... 2,000 2,000
EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL....... ............... 540
MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL.... 25,000 25,000
NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ............... 300
IL...................................
OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL 109,790 105,000
& KY.................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, 20,000 18,000
IL, IA, MN, MO &.....................
WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL.................. 1,170 1,170
INDIANA
INDIANA HARBOR CONFINED DISPOSAL ............... 13,500
FACILITY, IN\1\......................
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN.............. 20,000 20,000
MT. ZION MILL POND DAM, FULTON COUNTY, ............... 575
IN...................................
IOWA
DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA..... ............... 2,700
DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND ............... 4,300
GREENBELT, IA........................
MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, 70,000 60,000
KS, MO, MT, NE.......................
KANSAS
TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO........... 2,500 3,500
KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE 1,000 1,000
RIVER, KY............................
MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY, IL (MAJOR 1,000 1,000
REHAB)\1\............................
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY 123,000 123,000
(SEEPAGE CONTROL)....................
LOUISIANA
ASCENSION PARISH, LA [EI]............. ............... 1,000
COMITE RIVER, LA...................... ............... 8,000
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [FC]...... ............... 3,000
EAST BATON ROUGE, LA [EI]............. ............... 500
J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA...... 7,000 7,000
LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA [CG]...... 1,200 5,800
LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [EI]............ ............... 500
MARYLAND
ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD................. ............... 1,000
ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD........ ............... 4,500
CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 1,000
RESTORATION AND PROTECTION...........
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & ............... 2,000
VA...................................
POPLAR ISLAND, MD..................... ............... 8,550
MASSACHUSETTS
MUDDY RIVER, MA....................... 4,000 5,000
MICHIGAN
GENESEE COUNTY, MI.................... ............... 600
GEORGE W. KUHN DRAIN PROJECT, MI...... ............... 300
GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM ............... 2,000
RESTORATION, MI......................
NEGAUNEE, MI.......................... ............... 1,000
SAULT STE MARIE REPLACEMENT LOCK, MI.. ............... 1,000
MINNESOTA
BRECKENRIDGE, MN...................... ............... 5,000
ROSEAU, MN............................ ............... 2,500
MISSISSIPPI
DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER ............... 8,000
SYSTEM, MS...........................
MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 10,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, MS...................
MISSOURI
BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO..... ............... 750
BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO... 5,600 5,600
CHESTERFIELD, MO...................... 3,331 3,331
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 40,000 40,000
KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS................. 700 ...............
MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY CITY ............... 1,525
LEVEE, MO............................
MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS 580 580
(REG WORKS), MO......................
MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPI RIVERS ............... 1,000
ENHANCEMENT, MO......................
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L-385), ............... 2,500
MO, IA, NE, KS.......................
ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO........ 566 566
SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS ............... 4,000
CITY, MO.............................
MONTANA
FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT........ ............... 1,869
RURAL MONTANA, MT..................... ............... 5,000
NEBRASKA
ANTELOPE CREEK, NE.................... 5,697 5,697
NEVADA
RURAL NEVADA [EI], NV................. ............... 15,000
NEW JERSEY
BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR ............... 5,000
INLET, NJ............................
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 2,000
INLET (ABSECON IS....................
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 80
INLET, BRIGANTINE....................
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ.. ............... 200
DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, ............... 10,000
NJ, PA, DE...........................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, 6,500 6,500
NJ...................................
GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, ............... 3,500
NJ...................................
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ............ ............... 500
JOSEPH G. MINISH WATERFRONT, NJ....... ............... 3,000
LOWER CAP MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, ............... 400
NJ...................................
PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MGMT, NJ.... ............... 1,000
RAMAPO RIVER AT MAHWAH AND SUFFERN, NJ ............... 200
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ.... ............... 2,000
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT ............... 2,000
MONMOUTH, NJ.........................
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB- 7,000 7,000
BASIN, NJ............................
SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ...... ............... 2,000
TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ. ............... 2,000
NEW MEXICO
ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM........ ............... 500
ALAMOGORDO, NM........................ ............... 4,200
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, ............... 800
BERNALILLO TO BELE...................
RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO 800 800
BOSQUE DEL APACHE,...................
SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM...... ............... 4,000
NEW YORK
ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET 3,000 3,000
TO NORTON POINT,.....................
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY 5,800 5,800
LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY................. 700 700
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & 64,716 60,000
NJ...................................
NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY........... ............... 1,000
NEW YORK STATE CANAL, NY.............. ............... 1,000
ONONDAGA LAKE, NY..................... ............... 1,000
ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NY.............. ............... 1,000
NORTH CAROLINA
BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC.......... ............... 900
CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC....... 1,500 1,500
WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, 400 400
NC...................................
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. 1,800 1,800
NORTH DAKOTA
GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND 8,620 8,620
(REPLACEMENT)........................
GRAND FORKS, ND--EAST GRAND FORKS, MN. ............... 2,617
MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND........ ............... 300
NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 15,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, ND...................
OHIO
DOVER DAM, MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH (DAM 18,500 18,500
SAFETY ASSURANCE)....................
HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OHIO....
............... 1,656
OHIO EI, OH........................... ............... 1,000
OKLAHOMA
CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY).......... 24,250 24,250
OREGON
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS 500 500
SITES, OR & WA.......................
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR.................... 500 500
WILLAMETTE TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR.... 11,000 11,000
PENNSYLVANIA
EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC 25,000 25,000
INSTABILITY CORRE....................
LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4, MONONGAHELA 6,210 6,210
RIVER, PA............................
PRESQUE ISLE, PA...................... 1,000 1,000
WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA.... ............... 1,200
PUERTO RICO
PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR....... 45,000 42,000
RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR.................. 5,000 5,000
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD...... ............... 4,000
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL DAM (SEEPAGE CONTROL), TN. 56,000 56,000
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 1,000 1,000
TEXAS
BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX.............. 7,300 5,300
CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER ............... 500
TRINITY RIVER, TX....................
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... ............... 2,000
DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY ............... 22,000
RIVER, TX............................
JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ............... 1,500
ARLINGTON, TX........................
RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & ............... 1,000
OK...................................
SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX... ............... 5,000
SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX............... 25,700 18,000
TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX................ 8,000 6,000
UTAH
RURAL UTAH, UT [EI]................... ............... 20,000
VERMONT
BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT................. ............... 500
LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT. ............... 1,000
VIRGINIA
AIWW, BRIDGES AT DEEP CREEK, VA....... 1,500 ...............
JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, ............... 2,234
VA...................................
JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC 16,915 16,915
(REPLACEMENT)........................
NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA..... 28,500 ...............
NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS ............... 1,000
(DEEPENING), VA......................
RICHMOND CSO, VA...................... ............... 150
ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS 1,075 1,075
AREA, VA.............................
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH GAS ABATEMENT, WA........ 1,000 1,000
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR & 95,800 85,000
WA...................................
DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA.... 2,600 2,600
HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA................. 13,000 13,000
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM 1,650 1,650
RESTORATION, WA, OR..................
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 1,500 1,500
COMP, WA, OR, ID.....................
MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA... 1,500 1,500
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA.................. 400 400
PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS ............... 200
RESTORATION, WA......................
SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA.......... ............... 5,000
WEST VIRGINIA
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.................... 86,700 86,700
GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV............ ............... 1,500
ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND ............... 21,750
LOGAN, WV, VA........................
LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER ............... 6,750
CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, V..............
VIRGINIA.............................. ............... (4,000)
WEST VIRGINIA......................... ............... (2,750)
LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV........... ............... 1,955
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, FOR PROJECTS.......... 1,610,020 1,815,414
NATIONAL PROGRAMS:
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL................. 4,000 5,000
GUNTERSVILLE LAKE HYDRILLA/MILFOIL.... ............... (150)
FIFE LAKE AQUATIC WEED CONTROL, MI ............... (145)
BLACK LAKE, OGDENSBURG, NY........ ............... (100)
SODUS BAY, NY..................... ............... (100)
LAKE CHAUTAUQUA, JAMESTOWN, NY.... ............... (50)
LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT................ ............... (500)
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 6,967 25,000
206).................................
UPPER YORK CREEK DAM REMOVAL, CA.. ............... ...............
GOOSE CREEK, CO................... ............... ...............
TAMARISK ERADICATION ALONG THE ............... ...............
COLORADO RIVER,..................
MILL RIVER RESTORATION, STAMFORD, ............... ...............
CT...............................
CHATTAHOOCHEE FALL-LINE ECOSYSTEM ............... ...............
RESTORATION......................
JACKSON CREEK, GWINNETT CO, GA.... ............... ...............
LITTLE RIVER WATERSHED, HALL ............... ...............
COUNTY, GA.......................
PARADISE CREEK, ID................ ............... ...............
CHARITON RIVER AND RATHBUN LAKE ............... ...............
WATERSHED, IA....................
EMIQUON PRESERVE, IL.............. ............... ...............
ORLAND PARK, IL................... ............... ...............
CHARITON RIVER/RATHBUN LAKE, IA... ............... ...............
CLEAR CREEK AND IOWA RIVER, ............... ...............
JOHNSON COUNTY, IA...............
DUCK CREEK, DAVENPORT, IA......... ............... ...............
STORM LAKE, IA.................... ............... ...............
VENTURA MARSH, IA................. ............... ...............
WHITEBREAST CREEK WATERSHED, IA... ............... ...............
BURAS MARINA, LA.................. ............... ...............
FALSE RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, ............... ...............
POINT COUPE......................
LAKE KILLARNEY, LOUISIANA STATE ............... ...............
PENITENTIARY,....................
ZEMURRAY PARK LAKE RESTORATION, ............... ...............
TANGIPAHOA PAR...................
MALDEN RIVER ECOSYSTEM, MA........ ............... ...............
MILFORD POND RESTORATION, MILFORD, ............... ...............
MA...............................
DEEP RUN/TIBER HUDSON, HOWARD ............... ...............
COUNTY, MD.......................
DOG ISLAND SHOALS, MD............. ............... ...............
GREENBURY POINT, MD............... ............... ...............
NORTH BEACH, MD................... ............... ...............
NORTHWEST BRANCH, ANACOSTIA RIVER, ............... ...............
MD...............................
PAINT BRANCH FISH PASSAGE, MD..... ............... ...............
PAINTER CREEK, MN................. ............... ...............
MUSCONETCONG RIVER DAM REMOVALS, ............... ...............
NJ...............................
BLUE HOLE LAKE STATE PARK, NM..... ............... ...............
JANES-WALLACE MEMORIAL DAM, SANTA ............... ...............
ROSA, NM.........................
KINGS PARK, NY.................... ............... ...............
MUD CREEK, GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY.... ............... ...............
SOUNDVIEW PARK, BRONX, NY......... ............... ...............
SPRING CREEK, NY.................. ............... ...............
CONCORD STREAMS RESTORATION, NC... ............... ...............
WESTERN CARY STREAM RESTORATION, ............... ...............
CARY, NC.........................
WILSON BAY RESTORATION, ............... ...............
JACKSONVILLE, NC.................
DRAYTON DAM, ND................... ............... ...............
CAMP CREEK, ZUMWALT PRAIRIE ............... ...............
PRESERVE, OR.....................
EUGENE DELTA PONDS, OR............ ............... ...............
KELLOGG CREEK, OR................. ............... ...............
OAKS BOTTOM, OR................... ............... ...............
SPRINGFIELD MILLRACE, OR.......... ............... ...............
CODORUS CREEK WATERSHED ............... ...............
RESTORATION, PA..................
NARROW RIVER, RI.................. ............... ...............
WINNEAPAUG POND RESTORATION, RI... ............... ...............
MOSES LAKE, TX.................... ............... ...............
RIO GRANDE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, ............... ...............
LAREDO, TX.......................
SPRING LAKE, SAN MARCOS, TX....... ............... ...............
STEPHENVILLE WWTP, TX............. ............... ...............
CARPENTER CREEK, WA............... ............... ...............
BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL ............... 10,000
(SECTION 204, 206, 933...............
BLACKHAWK BOTTOMS, IA............. ............... ...............
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, SHELL ISLAND ............... ...............
PASS, ST. MAR....................
CALC RV, MI 5--14 KS, LA.......... ............... ...............
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL BARRIER ............... ...............
ISLAND RESTORAT..................
CAPE COD CANAL, SANDWICH, MA...... ............... ...............
NEWBURY HARBOR, MA................ ............... ...............
NJIWW BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGE, NJ ............... ...............
NJIWW, DREDGED HOLE 35, NJ........ ............... ...............
BUFFALO RIVER, NY................. ............... ...............
MANTEO OLD HOUSE, NC.............. ............... ...............
MAUMEE BAY REGIONAL SEDIMENT ............... ...............
MANAGEMENT, OH...................
WYNN ROAD REGIONAL SEDIMENT ............... ...............
MANAGEMENT, OH...................
SOUTH PADRE ISLAND, TX............ ............... ...............
EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE 1,477 7,000
PROTECTION (SECTION..................
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205).. 12,049 38,000
INDIAN BAYOU, AR.................. ............... ...............
WYNNE, AR......................... ............... ...............
COSGROVE CREEK, CALAVERAS COUNTY, ............... ...............
CA...............................
LAS GALLINAS CREEK/SANTA VENETIA ............... ...............
LEVEE, CA........................
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT, ............... ...............
DE...............................
INDIAN/DRY CREEK CEDAR RAPIDS, IA. ............... ...............
MAD CREEK, MUSCATINE, IA.......... ............... ...............
WINNEBAGO RIVER, MASON CITY, IA... ............... ...............
CONCORDIA, KS..................... ............... ...............
EUREKA CREEK, MANHATTAN, KS....... ............... ...............
NEODESHA, KS...................... ............... ...............
SEDGWICK, KS...................... ............... ...............
HOPKINSVILLE DRY-DAM, KY.......... ............... ...............
NORTH RIVER, PEABODY, MA.......... ............... ...............
MCKINNEY BAYOU, TUNICA COUNTY, MS. ............... ...............
BLACKSNAKE CREEK, ST. JOSEPH, MO.. ............... ...............
LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION, DUTCHTOWN, ............... ...............
MO...............................
LIVINGSTON, MT.................... ............... ...............
PLATT RIVER, FREMONT, NE.......... ............... ...............
PLATT RIVER, SCHUYLER, NE......... ............... ...............
HATCH, NM......................... ............... ...............
ASSUNPINK CREEK, HAMILTON ............... ...............
TOWNSHIP, MERCER CO..............
JACKSON BROOK, NJ................. ............... ...............
PENNSVILLE, NJ.................... ............... ...............
PORT JERVIS, NY................... ............... ...............
BLANCHARD RIVER, OTTAWA, OH ............... ...............
(OTTAWA, OH).....................
DUCK CREEK, OH.................... ............... ...............
FINDLAY, OH....................... ............... ...............
PHILADELPHIA SHIPYARD SEA WALL, ............... ...............
PHILADELPHIA,....................
RIO DESCLABRADO, PR............... ............... ...............
RIO GUAMANI-GUAYA, PR............. ............... ...............
EAST PROVIDENCE, RI............... ............... ...............
BEAVER CREEK AND TRIBS, BRISTOL, ............... ...............
TN...............................
WV STATEWIDE FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, ............... ...............
WV...............................
NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)...... 1,436 7,000
SAVOONGA HARBOR, AK............... ............... ...............
OYSTER POINT MARINA/PARK ............... ...............
BREAKWATER, CA...................
NAPOLEAN AVENUE CONTAINER TERMINAL ............... ...............
ACCESS, NE.......................
BASS HARBOR, ME................... ............... ...............
BUCKS HARBOR, MACHIASPORT, ME..... ............... ...............
RHODES POINT, SOMERSET CO, MD..... ............... ...............
WOODS HOLE, GREAT HARBOR, WOODS ............... ...............
HOLE, MA.........................
MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR BREAKWATER, ............... ...............
MI...............................
NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN, TRAVERSE ............... ...............
CITY, MI.........................
HAMPTON HARBOR, NH................ ............... ...............
DELAWARE RIVER, FAIRLESS TURNING ............... ...............
BASIN, PA........................
CHARLESTOWN BREACHWAY AND INLET, ............... ...............
RI...............................
POINT JUDITH HARBOR, EXPANSION ............... ...............
STUDY, RI........................
NORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL ............... ...............
HARBOR, TN.......................
TANGIER ISLAND JETTY, VA.......... ............... ...............
MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION ............... 9,043
111).................................
MOBILE PASS, AL................... ............... ...............
EAST PASS CHANNEL, PANAMA CITY, FL ............... ...............
BRUN HARBOR/JEKYLL IMPROVEMENTS, ............... ...............
GA...............................
CAMP ELLIS, SACO, ME.............. ............... ...............
MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, ............... ...............
MI...............................
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY.............. ............... ...............
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH............... ............... ...............
VERMILLION HARBOR, OH............. ............... ...............
WHITCOMB FLATS, WA................ ............... ...............
PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE 5,736 25,000
ENVIRONMENT (SECTI...................
LOWER CACHE RESTORATION, AR....... ............... ...............
MILLWOOD LAKE, GRASSY LAKE, AR.... ............... ...............
LOWER KINGMAN ISLAND, DC.......... ............... ...............
BRAIDED REACH, ID................. ............... ...............
SHORTY'S ISLAND, ID............... ............... ...............
RATHBUN LAKE HABITAT RESTORATION, ............... ...............
IA...............................
GREEN RIVER DAM MOD, KY........... ............... ...............
BAYOU DESIARD, MONROE, LA......... ............... ...............
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL MILE 12-- ............... ...............
31.4 RESTORATION.................
MORGANZA FORE-BAY RESTORATION, LA. ............... ...............
BLOOMINGTON STATE PARK, MO........ ............... ...............
BLUE VALLEY WETLANDS, JACKSON ............... ...............
COUNTY, MO.......................
DUCK CREEK, STODDARD COUNTY, MO... ............... ...............
LINCOLN PARK WEST, ECOSYSTEM ............... ...............
RESTORATION STUD.................
LAS CRUCES DAM ENVIRONMENTAL ............... ...............
RESTORATION, DON.................
AQUATIC HABITAT RESTORATION at ............... ...............
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA, NM..........
NORTHPORT HARBOR, NY.............. ............... ...............
SMOKES CREEK, NY.................. ............... ...............
PRISON FARM SHORELINE HABITAT, ND. ............... ...............
TAPPAN LAKE, OH................... ............... ...............
LOWER COLUMBIA SLOUGH, OR......... ............... ...............
WALLA WALLA RIVER, OR............. ............... ...............
LAKE CHAMPLAIN LAMPREY BARRIERS, ............... ...............
VT...............................
BENNINGTON LAKE DIVERSION DAM, WA. ............... ...............
SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)........ 680 4,230
BAY FARM ISLAND, CA [BAY FARM ............... ...............
DIKE, CA]........................
GOLETA BEACH, CA.................. ............... ...............
PISMO BEACH, CA................... ............... ...............
PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT.... ............... ...............
COASTAL AREAS, MARSHFIELD, MA..... ............... ...............
SEASIDE PARK, OCEAN COUNTY, NJ.... ............... ...............
FORT SAN GERONIMO, PR............. ............... ...............
LINCOLN PARK BEACH, WA............ ............... ...............
SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION 208)... 200 200
CAMP BAYOU CANAL, MOREHOUSE ............... ...............
PARISH, LA.......................
SNAGGING AND CLEARING UPPER BAYOU ............... ...............
BOEUF, LA........................
AUGLAIZE RIVER, OH................ ............... ...............
BLACKWELL LAKE, BLACKWELL, OK..... ............... ...............
SWCD FLOOD REDUCTION, OR.......... ............... ...............
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY 49,100 49,100
CORRECTION PROGRAM...................
DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE STUDIES:
ISABELLA DAM, CA..................
MARTIS CREEK DAM, CA & NV......... ............... ...............
CHERRY CREEK DAM, CO.............. ............... ...............
DWORSHAK DAM, ID.................. ............... ...............
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA.... ............... ...............
SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION STUDIES:
BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAM, AR.......... ............... ...............
HIDDEN DAM, CA.................... ............... ...............
SAN ANTONIO DAM, CA............... ............... ...............
TERMINUS DAM, CA.................. ............... ...............
WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, CA.......... ............... ...............
TRINIDAD DAM, CO.................. ............... ...............
HOP BROOK DAM, CT................. ............... ...............
MANSFIELD HOLLOW DAM, CT.......... ............... ...............
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE (REACH 2&3), ............... ...............
FL...............................
DWORSHAK DAM, ID.................. ............... ...............
LA GRANGE L&D, IL................. ............... ...............
LAKE SHELBYVILLE DAM, IL.......... ............... ...............
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, LOCK AND DAM ............... ...............
24, IL&MO........................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, LOCK AND DAM ............... ...............
25, IL&MO........................
THOMAS J. O'BRIEN CONTROLLING ............... ...............
WORKS L&D, IL....................
BROOKVILLE DAM, IN................ ............... ...............
J. EDWARD ROUSH DAM, IN........... ............... ...............
PATOKA LAKE DAM, IN............... ............... ...............
SALAMONIE LAKE DAM, IN............ ............... ...............
HARTFORD LEVEE AT JOHN REDMOND, KS ............... ...............
GREEN RIVER LAKE DAM, KY.......... ............... ...............
MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY & OH... ............... ...............
NOLIN LAKE DAM, KY................ ............... ...............
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, DAM, KY......... ............... ...............
SALAMONIE LAKE DAM, KY............ ............... ...............
RUSSELL B. LONG L&D, LA........... ............... ...............
WESTVILLE LAKE DAM, MA............ ............... ...............
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LOCK AND DAM 1, ............... ...............
MN...............................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LOCK AND DAM 2, ............... ...............
MN...............................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LOCK AND DAM 3, ............... ...............
MN...............................
ORWELL RESERVOIR DAM, MN.......... ............... ...............
ARKABUTLA, MS..................... ............... ...............
CAPE FEAR RIVER LOCK AND DAM 1, NC ............... ...............
BEACH CITY DAM, OH................ ............... ...............
BOLIVAR DAM, OH................... ............... ...............
DELAWARE DAM, OH.................. ............... ...............
MAGNOLIA LEVEE,(BOLIVAR DAM), OH.. ............... ...............
MOHAWK DAM, OH.................... ............... ...............
CUMBERLAND DIKE--TEXOMA, OK....... ............... ...............
KEYSTONE LAKE DAM, OK............. ............... ...............
ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM, OK... ............... ...............
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA.. ............... ...............
FOSTER DAM, OR.................... ............... ...............
WILLAMETTE FALLS LOCK, OR......... ............... ...............
CHARLEROIS (MONOR), PA............ ............... ...............
CURWENSVILLE DAM, PA.............. ............... ...............
EAST BRANCH DAM, CLARION RIVER, PA ............... ...............
HAMMOND DAM, PA................... ............... ...............
MONTGOMERY LOCKS AND DAM, PA...... ............... ...............
J. PERCY PRIEST, TN............... ............... ...............
ADDICKS DAM, BUFFALO BAYOU, TX.... ............... ...............
BARKER DAM (BUFFALO BAYOU,), TX... ............... ...............
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX................ ............... ...............
PROCTOR DAM, TX................... ............... ...............
STILLHOUSE-HOLLOW DAM, TX......... ............... ...............
TOWN BLUFF DAM, TX................ ............... ...............
WHITNEY LEVEE, TX................. ............... ...............
BALL MOUNTAIN DAM, VT............. ............... ...............
HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA............. ............... ...............
MILL CREEK AND MILL CREEK ............... ...............
DIVERSION DAM, WA................
NEW CUMBERLAND L&D, WV............ ............... ...............
CEDARS LOCK AND DAM, WI........... ............... ...............
DEPERE GEN LAWS, WI............... ............... ...............
LITTLE CHUTE, WI.................. ............... ...............
RAPIDE CROCHE LOCK AND DAM, WI.... ............... ...............
DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES ............... 5,199
PROGRAM [DMDF].......................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL 1......... ............... (1,000)
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA 1............. ............... (900)
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN ............... (1,501)
1................................
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 1........... ............... (1,798)
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND........... 21,000 21,000
ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC 5,000 1,000
LAW 106-457).........................
INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD 60 60
EXPENSES)............................
INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE EXP). 275 275
SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT ............... 1,000
AND DEMONSTRATION....................
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, FOR PROJECTS NOT 107,980 208,107
LISTED UNDER STATES............
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.................. ............... -100,426
---------------------------------
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL..... 1,718,000 1,924,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa [ACT], Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-
Flint [ACF] Rivers, Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.--The
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers,
is directed to provide an updated calculation of the critical
yield of all Federal projects in the ACF river basin and an
updated calculation of the critical yield of all Federal
projects in the ACT river basin within 120 days of enactment of
this Act.
Tuscaloosa, Alabama.--The Committee recommends $10,000,000
for the relocation project at Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Unalaska, Alaska.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for
continuation of this navigation project.
Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Arkansas.--The Committee has included no
funding to complete the continuing contract for this project
that was not funded in the budget request. It is the
Committee's understanding that the administration has committed
to fund this project through surplus ARRA funds.
Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma
and Texas.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue
levee rehabilitation work in Arkansas and Louisiana to protect
the 1.7 million-acre flood plain from crop damage; loss of
livestock; damage to levees, railroads, highways, industries,
and other river and urban developments.
Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkansas and
Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for protection
of critical infrastructure and land along the Red River below
Index, Arkansas. The project plan provides for revetment,
dikes, or cutoffs that can be accomplished in advance of
developing the design for the entire project.
Mid Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, California.--The
Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 reconstruction of
this flood control project. The project includes levee
reconstruction through installing landside berms with toe
drains, ditch relocation, embankment modification, slurry cut-
off walls, and developing land for fish and wildlife
mitigation.
Napa River, California.--The Committee recommendation
includes $1,000,000 rather than the $5,000,000 proposed in the
budget. This amount was reduced in recognition of the nearly
$100,000,000 this project received in the ARRA not due to any
diminution of support for the project by the Committee.
Napa River Salt Marsh, California.--The Committee has not
recommended any funding for this new construction start
proposed by the administration.
Santa Ana River, California.--The Committee recommends
$52,193,000 to continue construction of this flood control
project.
West Sacramento, California.--The Committee recommendation
included funding for the General Reevaluation Report in the
General Investigations Table.
Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach,
Delaware.--The Committee has funded this item in this table.
The budget request is shown in the O&M table as proposed by the
administration.
Delaware Coast Protection, Delaware.--The Committee
recommendation includes $390,000 to reimburse the State for the
Federal share of the annual operation and maintenance of the
sand bypass facilities.
Washington, DC and Vicinity, District of Columbia.--The
Committee recommendation has provided no funding for this new
construction start proposed by the administration.
Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration,
Florida.--The Committee has chosen to display the various,
separately authorized components of the project in the table in
addition to a single line item as was proposed in the budget.
The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain
visibility of the various project elements in the budget
process. The Committee has deleted the two new start requests
proposed by the administration for the Everglades these are
Site one and Indian River Lagoon-South. The total for these new
construction starts is $46,767,000 and the Central and Southern
Florida line item has been reduced by this amount. This should
not be interpreted as a reduction of support by this Committee
for this project. Even without the new starts, the funding
level for fiscal year 2010 is nearly $40,000,000 more than what
was provided in fiscal year 2009. Since fiscal year 2000 this
Committee has provided more than $1,300,000,000 in funding for
Everglades restoration projects which is nearly twice the level
of resources received by any other construction project in the
same period.
The Committee has provided no funding for the Modified
Waters Delivery Plan ($4,188,000) as proposed in the budget.
The Committee directed in the fiscal year 2009 Omnibus that
this project should be funded through the Interior
appropriations budget in future years. The Committee again
directs the administration to include the Modified Waters
Delivery Plan funding in the Interior budget in future budget
submissions.
Central and South Florida, Florida.--Within the funds
recommended, the Corps shall continue work on the Upper St.
Johns River project.
Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.--The Committee has
recommended $950,000 to continue work on the general
reevaluation report concerning further channel deepening.
Tampa Harbor, Florida.--$500,000 is provided to complete
the preconstruction engineering and design of navigation
improvements and channel deepening.
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.--The Committee
has recommended $5,000,000 for construction on aquatic nuisance
species Barriers I and II.
Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.--
The Committee recommends $105,000,000 to continue construction
of this project. None of the funds provided for the Olmsted
Locks and Dam Project or any other construction funds are to be
used to reimburse the Claims and Judgment Fund.
Upper Mississippi River Restoration, Illinois, Iowa,
Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin.--The Corps is directed to
complete a plan to transition this project to the Navigation
and Ecosystem Sustainability Program [NESP] for the Upper
Mississippi River System [UMRS]. Funding for NESP is dependent
on a solution to shortfalls in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund,
therefore a transition to NESP is not anticipated in the
immediate future. However, in order to facilitate the eventual
transition, while maintaining the Corps ecosystem restoration
capacity on the UMRS, the Corps is directed to limit planning
or construction under this authority to projects that can be
completed or readily transferred to NESP within 2 years of NESP
receiving sufficient construction funding to support program
transition.
Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), Indiana.--The
Committee has recommended funding for this project in the CG
account rather than in the O&M account as proposed by the
administration.
Missouri Fish and Wildlife Recovery, Iowa, Kansas,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.--
The Committee recommends $60,000,000 for this project. Within
the recommended funds, $18,000,000 is to be used for
modifications to the Intake Dam to provide additional habitat
for the pallid sturgeon.
Turkey Creek, Kansas and Missouri.--The Committee
recommendation includes $3,500,000 to continue construction of
this project.
Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, Kentucky.--The
Committee recommends $1,000,000 for continuation of the
project. Funding deficits in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund
prohibit the Committee from providing additional funds for the
upstream lock excavation contract. The Committee recognizes
that this is a critical path contract for the overall schedule.
However, until the revenue stream for the Inland Waterway Trust
Fund is enhanced, the Committee actions will be limited by
available Trust Fund revenues.
Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.--The Committee has
recommended $5,800,000 to continue efforts to provide 100-year
flood protection for this project. Surveys show the levee grade
is deficient by 12-18 inches.
Assateague Island Restoration, Maryland.--The Committee has
recommended funding for this project in the CG table as has
been the Committee tradition. The budget request is shown in
O&M as proposed by the administration.
Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and Virginia.--The Committee has recommended
$1,000,000 for continuation of this project that is integral to
the clean-up of the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Maryland and Virginia.--The
Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue oyster recovery
efforts.
Poplar Island, Maryland.--The Committee has recommended
funding for this project in the CG table as has been the
Committee tradition. The budget request is shown in O&M as
proposed by the administration.
Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas.--The Committee has not
recommended any funding for this new construction start
proposed by the administration.
Meramec River Basin, Valley City, Missouri.--The Committee
recommendation includes $1,525,000 for additional flood risk
management features to address problems that became apparent
during the 2008 flood.
Fort Peck Dam and Lake, Montana.--The Committee
recommendation includes $1,869,000 for continuation of the
disposition of Fort Peck cabins.
Rural Nevada, Nevada.--The Committee recommendation
provides $15,000,000 for this project. Within the funds
provided the Corps should give consideration to projects at
North Lemmon Valley; Spanish Springs Phased Sewering Project;
Indian Springs Wastewater Collection and Treatment System
Project; the MoapaValley Wastewater Collection System Project;
the Searchlight Water System Improvements Project; Huffaker
Hills Water Conservation; Lawton-Verdi; Boulder City; Lyon
County; Gerlach; Incline Village; Esmeralda County; Cold
Springs; Fallon; Goldfield; Churchill County; West Wendover;
Yearington; Virgin Valley Water District; Lovelock; Truckee
Meadows Water Authority; McGill-Ruth Consolidated Sewer and
Water District; Carlin; Eldorado Valley; Ely and Carson City.
Other communities that meet the program criteria should be
considered as funding allows.
Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, New Jersey.--The
Committee has recommended funding for this project in the CG
table as has been the Committee tradition. The budget request
is shown in O&M as proposed by the administration.
Lower Cape May Meadows--Cape May Point, New Jersey.--The
Committee has recommended funding for this project in the CG
table as has been the Committee tradition. The budget request
is shown in O&M as proposed by the administration.
Acequias Irrigation System, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommends $500,000 to continue restoration of these historic
irrigation distribution systems.
Middle Rio Grande Restoration, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommendation includes $24,016,000 to continue environmental
restoration efforts along the Rio Grande River within
Bernalillo County.
North Dakota [EI], North Dakota.--The Committee has
recommended $15,000,000 for this program. $7,900,000 is for the
Traill Rural Water District; $3,000,000 is for the North
Central Rural Water District; $950,000 is for the Barnes Rural
Water District; $750,000 for the Williams Rural Water District;
$600,000 for the Langdon Rural Water District; $425,000 for the
North Prairie Rural Water District; and $375,000 for the
Greater Ramsey Water District.
New York and New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.--
The Committee recommends $60,000 for continued construction of
this harbor project. The reduction made under this heading
should not be viewed as any diminution of support for this
project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of
Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the
Corps.
Ohio [EI], Ohio.--The Committee recommendation includes
$1,000,000. These funds should be used for the Marietta WWTP
and the Coalton Waterline.
Presque Isle, Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommends
$1,000,000 to continue this project.
Big Sioux River, South Dakota.--The Committee recommends
$4,000,000 to continue construction of this project. The
Committee recognizes that, rightly or wrongly, there was an
expectation by the project sponsors that this project was to be
funded under the ARRA. When the project list was released, this
project was not on the list due to the incredibly tortured
criteria the administration utilized to decide which projects
were funded. The Committee encourages the Corps to give
consideration to funding this project if surplus ARRA funds
become available.
Central City, Fort Worth, Upper Trinity River Basin,
Texas.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for the
Central City, Fort Worth, Texas, project.
Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas
and Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 to continue
construction of the project.
Sims Bayou, Houston, Texas.--The Committee recommendation
includes $20,000,000 for this project. The reduction made to
this project should not be viewed as any diminution of support
for this project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of
Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the
Corps.
Rural Utah, [EI], Utah.--The Committee recommendation
includes $20,000,000 to continue construction of eligible
projects.
Burlington Harbor, Vermont.--The Committee recommends
$500,000 to continue work on removal of oil bollards in the
harbor.
Lake Champlain Watershed Initiative, Vermont.--The
Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000 for continuation
of this project.
AIWW, Bridges at Deep Creek, Virginia.--The Committee has
not recommended any funding for this new construction start
proposed by the administration.
Norfolk Harbor, Craney Island, Virginia.--The Committee has
not recommended any funding for this new construction start
proposed by the administration.
Columbia River Fish Mitigation, Washington, Oregon, and
Idaho.--The Committee recommendation includes $85,000,000 for
this project. The reduction made to this project should not be
viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an
attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide
program among the various missions of the Corps.
Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland
River, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Virginia.--The Committee
recommends $6,750,000 for the continuation of the project.
Within the funds recommended, the Committee includes $4,000,000
for the Buchanan County, Dickenson County, and Grundy, Virginia
elements. Further, the recommendation includes $2,750,000 for
Kermit, Lower Mingo County, McDowell County, Upper Mingo, and
Wayne County, West Virginia.
Aquatic Plant Control Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $5,000,000 for this program. Funds
above the budget request are included for cost-shared programs
for Guntersville Lake, Alabama; Fife Lake, Michigan; Black Rock
Lake, Odensburg, New York; Sodus Bay, New York; Lake Champlain,
Vermont; and Lake Chautauqua, Jamestown, New York.
Section 204 and Section 111 of the Continuing Authorities
Program.--The Committee has recommended funding for these
programs in the CG table as has been the Committee tradition.
The budget request is shown in O&M as proposed by the
administration.
Dredged Material Disposal Facilities Program.--The
Committee has recommended funding for this project in the CG
table as has been the Committee tradition. The budget request
is shown in O&M as proposed by the administration.
Estuary Restoration Program.--The Committee has included
$1,000,000 for this program. Within this amount, consideration
should be given to the Colorado Lagoon, California, Restoration
project.
Shore Line Erosion Control Development and Demonstration
Program.--The Committee has recommended $1,000,000 to continue
monitoring programs and other appropriate activities under this
authority.
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM
When Congress authorized the initial Continuing Authorities
in the 1940s and 1950s, they were envisioned to provide a small
pool of money available to the Corps of Engineers to solve very
small localized problems without being encumbered by the longer
study and project authorization process. As more programs were
added to the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP] they became
increasingly popular with congressional Members and the public.
More and more congressionally directed projects began to appear
in the annual appropriations bills. At first these
congressionally directed projects were added to the base
program. As more and more of these congressionally directed
projects came into the program it became difficult for these
congressionally directed projects to be added to the base, and
as such, the base program began to shrink. Congressionally
directed projects now dominate all sections of the CAP Program.
Congressionally directed projects have proliferated to such an
extent that several of the sections are over-subscribed.
The budget justifications for the CAP program do not
provide much useful information as to how the administration
developed its program for fiscal year 2010. There is a dollar
value associated with each section and a listing of projects in
priority order that corresponds to the amount. However, the
Committee has no way of knowing whether the amount shown is
adequate. The Corps is directed to provide more information to
justify the amount shown on the justification sheets for fiscal
year 2011.
Starting in fiscal year 2008 the Committee no longer
provided any congressional earmarks for the section 14,
Emergency Bank Stabilization authority. Again this year, the
Committee has not provided either the administration's earmark
requests for this section or requests by Members for fiscal
year 2010. By definition these are projects that are estimated
to fail within 9-12 months. As an emergency situation the Chief
of Engineers should have the responsibility for determining how
these funds are expended in the most efficient and effective
manner. Budget justifications for this section should display
the anticipated projects and associated costs to be undertaken
in the budget year as well as the anticipated resources
necessary to address emergencies that arise in the budget year.
Starting in fiscal year 2011, the Committee will no longer
list individual projects in the CAP program in the table. The
priority system that has been established will guide the
execution of the projects.
CAP projects and studies are listed in the CG table
immediately preceding this section. This listing includes the
priority projects listed in the President's budget request as
well as those that were requested by Members. The Committee has
not provided dollar amounts for the named projects in the
report. This lack of specificity in project amounts is intended
to give the Chief of Engineers flexibility within the various
sections of the CAP program in order to address the backlog.
The Committee has repeated the guidance below from the fiscal
year 2009 statement of the managers that accompanied Public Law
111-8 detailing how the Corps should prioritize work in the CAP
program.
The Corps shall give first priority to the projects listed
in the tables in this report. For each CAP section, available
funds over and above the amounts specified shall be allocated
to the projects listed in the table for that section, including
projects with specified amounts, in the following sequence of
steps until the funds are exhausted:
--capability-level funds for ongoing projects that have
executed cost sharing agreements for the applicable
phase;
--capability-level funds for projects that are ready for
execution of new cost sharing agreements for the
applicable phase and for which Corps headquarters
authorizes execution of the agreements;
--funds, as permitted by Corps policies, for other projects
previously funded for the applicable phase but not
ready for execution of new cost sharing agreements; and
--funds as permitted by Corps policies, for projects not
previously funded for the applicable phase.
Within the step at which available funds are exhausted for
each CAP section, funds shall be allocated to the projects in
that section that rank high according to the following factors:
high overall performance based on outputs; high percent
fiscally complete; high unobligated carry-in; and listing in
any conference report or statement of managers from fiscal year
2004 through fiscal year 2009. Section 14 funds shall be
allocated to the projects that address the most significant
risks and adverse consequences, irrespective of phase or
previous funding history.
The Corps shall continue the ongoing process for suspending
and terminating inactive projects. Suspended projects shall not
be reactivated or funded unless the sponsor reaffirms in
writing its support for the project and establishes its
willingness and capability to execute its project
responsibilities.
In order to provide a mix of studies, design, and
construction within each CAP section, the Corps is directed to
divide the funding generally 80/20 between the design and
implementation and the feasibility phases within each
authority. The Chief of Engineers shall provide a report to the
Committees on Appropriations within 30 days of enactment of
this act detailing how funds will be distributed to the
individual items in the various CAP sections for the fiscal
year. The Chief shall also provide an annual report at the end
of each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the backlog
of projects. The report should include the completions and
terminations as well as progress of ongoing work.
The Corps is directed not to initiate any new continuing
authorities projects in sections 205, 206, 208, or 1135 without
explicit congressional direction. New projects may be initiated
in the remaining sections after an assessment is made that such
projects can be funded over time based on historical averages
of the appropriation for that section and after prior approval
by the Committees on Appropriations.
FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS,
KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$383,823,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 248,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 340,000,000
\1\Excludes emergency funds of $375,000,000.
This appropriation funds planning, construction, and
operation and maintenance activities associated with water
resource projects located in the lower Mississippi River Valley
from Cape Girardeau, Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico.
The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are
shown on the following table:
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Fiscal year
Project title 2009 budget 2010
request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVESTIGATIONS
ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA.............. 1,000 1,000
DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA.......... 400 400
COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA 84 350
LAKE, MS...............................
MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT 100 100
STUDY, TN & MS.........................
QUIVER RIVER, MS........................ .............. 160
SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR.................. .............. 300
SPRING BAYOU, LA........................ .............. 350
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA...... 500 1,665
CONSTRUCTION
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, 47,721 47,721
MO, TN.................................
GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................ .............. 10,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 28,874 45,439
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.............. .............. 3,700
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.. 2,664 3,000
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 5,834 15,000
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............ 2,250 2,250
YAZOO BASIN--BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... .............. 3,200
YAZOO BASIN--DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, .............. 23,200
MS.....................................
YAZOO BASIN--MAIN STEM, MS.............. .............. 25
YAZOO BASIN--REFORMULATION UNIT, MS..... .............. 1,500
YAZOO BASIN--UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS... .............. 13,000
YAZOO BASIN--BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU. .............. 75
YAZOO BASIN--YAZOO BACKWATER, MS........ .............. 629
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, 67,350 67,350
MO & TN................................
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR...... 211 400
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR....... 425 425
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR.... 223 223
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR.... 150 175
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 8,011 11,708
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR............... 1,217 1,217
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL....... 191 191
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY....... 100 100
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.. 2,532 2,532
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 12,374 12,374
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA..... 43 43
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA...... 54 54
BONNET CARRE, LA........................ 2,415 3,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA....... 1,716 1,716
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA 358 1,800
OLD RIVER, LA........................... 9,739 10,200
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA.. 100 100
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, 2,485 2,485
AR & LA................................
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA... 3,660 3,660
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS................... 24 500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS....... 25 25
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS.................... 42 537
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS......... 6,091 6,870
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... 154 2,400
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS.............. 5,915 7,640
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS.............. 807 807
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS........... 6,331 7,381
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.............. 1,733 2,800
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............ 7,329 9,183
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............ 778 825
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX 332 400
CHAN, MS...............................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS... 544 544
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS............. 731 731
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO....... 150 150
ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.............. 6,243 9,843
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO..................... 5,416 5,416
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN....... 45 45
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN....... 1,417 1,417
REMAINING ITEMS:
MAPPING............................. 1,112 1,112
REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE...... .............. -11,943
-------------------------------
TOTAL............................. 248,000 340,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
Quiver River, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended
$160,000 to continue studies to identify options for improving
water quality while addressing other needs to create a
situation where additional development could be accommodated
without adversely impacting fish and wildlife habitat.
Southeast Arkansas, Arkansas.--The Committee recommends
$300,000 to continue feasibility studies of current flooding,
ecosystem restoration and water supply problems and needs
throughout the 1.2 million-acre watershed.
CONSTRUCTION
Grand Prairie, Arkansas.--The Committee has recommended
$10,000,000 for continued construction of the project.
Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--Additional
funds above the budget request could be used for the following
activities: to fully fund relief wells at Delta, Mississippi;
Linda, Missouri; Vidalia-Moreville, Louisiana, Item 365-R; and
continue design efforts.
Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower Basin, Mississippi.--The
Committee recognizes the need for control of bank erosion along
the Big Sunflower River and has recommended $3,200,000 for the
continued construction of the Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River
Project. $2,00,000 is recommended to continue bank
stabilization erosion repairs at selected sites in the
Sunflower Basin.
The Committee expects the water quality funds to be used
for the monitoring and establishment of water quality reference
indicators and the development of Total Maximum Daily Loads
target loads on Yazoo Basin projects.
Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters Project, Mississippi.--The
Committee has recommended $23,200,000 to continue construction
of this erosion protection projects in the Yazoo Basin.
Yazoo Basin, Upper Yazoo Project, Mississippi.--The
Committee has recommended $13,000,000 to continue construction
of this flood control project.
MAINTENANCE
Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.--Funds provided
above the budget request are recommended for resurfacing the
mainline levee at various reaches to be determined throughout
the Memphis District; levee slide repairs; provide gravel for
levees; operation and maintenance of LMRMRIS [MV MISSISSIPPI
IV]; and mitigation in the Vicksburg District.
Mississippi Lakes.--The Committee has recommended
additional funding to address the maintenance backlog at
Arkabutla, Sardis, Enid, and Grenada Lakes in Mississippi.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL
Appropriations, 2009\1\................................. $2,201,900,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 2,504,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,450,000,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $2,117,875,000.
This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and
related activities at the water resources projects that the
Corps operates and maintains. Work to be accomplished consists
of dredging, repair, and operation of structures and other
facilities, as authorized in the various River and Harbor,
Flood Control, and Water Resources Development Acts. Related
activities include aquatic plant control, monitoring of
completed projects where appropriate, removal of sunken
vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce
statistics.
The O&M budget request appears to have been increased by
$302,100,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount. However
this is a little misleading. As was pointed out in the CG
table, $47,067,000 in projects appears to have been
inadvertently funded under O&M rather than CG. Once these
projects are shifted back to CG, the increase is still
$255,033,000 when compared to the fiscal year 2009 enacted
amount. This moderate increase is a step in the right direction
after years of flat budgets. The Committee also acknowledges
that the administration has returned to the tradition of
displaying the O&M budget on a project by project basis.
With the $47,067,000 in CG items removed from the O&M
request, the effective O&M request is $2,456,933,000 rather
than the $2,504,000,000 presented in the budget request. A list
of these migrated projects is displayed under the CG heading
earlier in this report.
Maintenance of our aging water infrastructure inventory
gets more expensive every year, however, it is consistently
underfunded. If this trend continues, the Corps will not be
able to maintain expected levels of service at all of its
projects. The Committee has maintained its tradition of
supporting what the budget request terms as ``low use harbors
and waterways''. The Committee recognizes the importance of
these facilities and will continue to provide funding for them.
The Committee is pleased that the Administration provided a
modest increase to O&M; however, this increase needs to be a
commitment for upcoming fiscal years to provide the resources
necessary to deal with our aging infrastructure.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget estimate recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ALABAMA-COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER 253 253
STUDY, AL............................
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL............... 16,785 16,785
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 24,180 24,180
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL........ 5,735 5,735
MOBILE HARBOR, AL..................... 23,996 23,996
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL......... 100 100
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE 2,100 2,500
MITIGATION, AL &.....................
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS. 22,978 25,000
WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA 8,972 8,972
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL. 76 76
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK.................. 18,659 18,659
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK................. 2,816 2,816
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK................. 885 885
HOMER HARBOR, AK...................... 400 400
KODIAK HARBOR, AK..................... ............... 240
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK..... 168 168
NOME HARBOR, AK....................... 820 820
PETERSBURG NORTH HARBOR, AK........... ............... 500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK......... 930 930
ARIZONA
ALAMO LAKE, AZ........................ 1,542 1,542
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ..... 199 199
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ.................. 1,320 1,320
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ... 31 31
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ................. 300 300
ARKANSAS
BEAVER LAKE, AR....................... 8,864 8,864
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR..... 6,579 7,079
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR................ 1,914 1,914
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR.................. 14,234 14,484
DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM, AR............. 9,754 9,754
DEGRAY LAKE, AR....................... 6,503 7,003
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR...................... 1,752 1,752
DIERKS LAKE, AR....................... 1,360 1,360
GILLHAM LAKE, AR...................... 1,366 1,366
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR................. 7,759 7,759
HELENA HARBOR, AR..................... 40 40
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR..... 673 673
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 40,016 40,016
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR................
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR..................... 5,122 5,122
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR......... 4,505 5,005
NIMROD LAKE, AR....................... 2,289 2,289
NORFORK LAKE, AR...................... 5,717 5,717
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR.................... 397 800
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA.. 9,605 9,605
OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM, AR...... 5,725 5,725
WHITE RIVER, AR....................... 40 40
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR.................. 4 115
CALIFORNIA
BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA.................. 2,234 2,234
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA..... 2,041 2,041
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA. 3,829 3,829
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & 5,139 5,139
CHANNEL, CA..........................
FARMINGTON DAM, CA.................... 481 481
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA.......... 2,170 2,170
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA........... 3,010 3,010
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA..... 6,702 6,702
ISABELLA LAKE, CA..................... 1,802 1,802
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA.. 4,597 4,597
MARINA DEL REY, CA.................... ............... 3,000
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA............. 451 451
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA.................. 288 288
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA.................. 3,300 3,300
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA.................... 2,515 2,515
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, 1,898 1,898
CA...................................
NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA................ 1,780 1,780
OAKLAND HARBOR, CA.................... 9,255 9,255
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA.................. 1,500 1,500
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA.................... 3,201 3,201
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA......... 2,442 2,442
REDWOOD CITY HARBOR................... 6,745 6,745
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA................... 9,589 9,589
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30-FOOT PROJECT), CA 3,351 3,351
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 1,712 1,712
(DEBRIS CONTROL), CA.................
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT 234 234
CHANNEL, CA..........................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL 1,118 1,118
STRUCTURE, CA........................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA 2,945 2,945
(DRIFT REMOVAL)......................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA.............. 3,237 3,237
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, 3,554 3,554
CA...................................
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, 2,650 2,650
CA...................................
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA............. 3,094 3,094
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA.............. 1,690 1,690
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA... 1,915 1,915
SUCCESS LAKE, CA...................... 1,989 1,989
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA................ 4,019 4,019
TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA......... 2,037 2,037
VENTURA HARBOR, CA.................... 6,426 6,426
YUBA RIVER, CA........................ 146 146
COLORADO
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO................... 395 395
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO.................... 1,442 1,442
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO................. 1,999 1,999
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO..... 773 773
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO............. 2,554 2,554
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO... 612 612
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO..................... 960 960
CONNECTICUT
BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT................... 1,436 1,436
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT.............. 615 615
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT................ 442 442
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT.................... 917 917
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT..... 392 392
LONG ISLAND SOUND DMMP, CT............ 2,000 2,000
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT............. 861 861
MYSTIC RIVER, CT...................... 250 250
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT............. 610 610
NORWALK HARBOR, CT.................... ............... 1,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT......... 1,050 1,050
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT........ 434 434
THOMASTON DAM, CT..................... 1,136 1,136
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT................ 569 569
DELAWARE
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT 350 ...............
INLET TO LEWES BEACH.................
HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE........... ............... 200
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO 28,390 28,390
CHESAPEAKE BAY, D....................
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO 70 70
DELAWARE BAY, D......................
MISPILLION RIVER, DE.................. 30 30
MURDERKILL RIVER, DE.................. 30 30
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE......... 105 105
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE................. 320 2,320
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC..... 140 140
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVER, DC (DRIFT 805 805
REMOVAL).............................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC......... 30 30
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC................. 25 25
FLORIDA
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL.................. 4,600 4,600
CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........ 23,876 23,876
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL....... 56 56
FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL................. 1,625 1,625
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL..... 1,200 1,200
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE 780 2,000
RIVER TO ANCLOTE.....................
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO 500 689
MIAMI, FL............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL\1\............ 7,035 6,035
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 9,732 9,732
SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA................
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL............... 2,357 2,357
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL................. 3,225 3,225
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL................ 2,055 2,055
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL.................. 67 67
PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL............... 600 600
PORT ST. JOE, FL, DMMP................ ............... 500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL......... 1,300 1,300
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL......... 4,445 4,445
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL... 30 30
ST. LUCIE INLET, FL................... 350 350
TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... 5,620 5,620
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL. 380 380
GEORGIA
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA.................... 7,077 7,077
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT 2,437 2,437
RIVERS, GA, AL &.....................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA.... 265 1,000
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA.................. 7,156 7,156
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. 8,924 8,924
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA.............. 8,318 8,318
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC................ 11,999 11,999
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 48 48
PROJECTS, GA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA..... 108 108
J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC........ 10,316 10,316
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA......... 151 151
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC. 9,209 9,209
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA\1\................ 15,087 14,187
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA...... 274 574
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL...... 9,591 9,591
HAWAII
BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI.............. 201 201
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI..... 705 705
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI......... 570 570
IDAHO
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID.................. 1,545 1,545
DWORKSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID....... 2,875 2,875
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID..... 324 324
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID................... 2,597 2,597
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID... 484 484
ILLINOIS
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN\1\.. 4,621 3,120
CARLYLE LAKE, IL...................... 5,171 5,171
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL.................... 3,889 3,889
CHICAGO RIVER, IL..................... 493 493
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL............. 352 352
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVR 1,748 2,648
PORTION).............................
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVS 31,736 31,736
PORTION).............................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 65 65
PROJECTS, IL.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL..... 1,298 1,298
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL........ 2,148 2,148
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL........... 683 683
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL.................. 5,454 5,454
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 58,714 58,714
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BTWN MISSOURI RIVER 22,227 22,227
AND MINNEAPOLIS......................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL......... 104 104
REND LAKE, IL......................... 5,386 5,386
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 685 685
WATERS, IL...........................
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL................... 492 492
INDIANA
BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN................... 862 862
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN............. 165 165
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN.................. 892 892
CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN.............. 1,027 1,027
INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL 13,500 ...............
FACILITY, IN\1\......................
INDIANA HARBOR, IN.................... 2,330 2,330
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN..... 709 709
J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.............. 944 944
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN................. 974 974
MONROE LAKE, IN....................... 1,101 1,101
PATOKA LAKE, IN....................... 887 887
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN......... 185 185
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN.................... 904 904
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 126 126
WATERS, IN...........................
IOWA
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA................... 3,381 3,381
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA..... 483 483
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO 129 129
SIOUX CITY, IA.......................
MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO THE MOUTH, IA, 6,059 7,000
KS, MO & NE..........................
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO RULO, 2,610 2,610
IA, KS, MO & NE......................
RATHBUN LAKE, IA...................... 3,019 3,019
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA... 3,978 4,567
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA.................. 4,685 5,032
KANSAS
CLINTON LAKE, KS...................... 2,073 2,073
COUNCIL GRAVE LAKE, KS................ 1,739 1,739
EL DORADO LAKE, KS.................... 786 786
ELK CITY LAKE, KS..................... 718 718
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS................... 1,283 1,283
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS.................... 860 860
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS..... 220 220
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS.... 3,685 3,685
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS.................... 2,288 2,288
MARION LAKE, KS....................... 1,820 1,820
MELVERN LAKE, KS...................... 2,151 2,151
MILFORD LAKE, KS...................... 2,057 2,057
PEARSON-SKUBITZ BILL HILL LAKE, KS.... 1,472 1,472
PERRY LAKE, KS........................ 2,015 2,015
POMONA LAKE, KS....................... 2,047 2,047
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS... 100 100
TORONTO LAKE, KS...................... 3,522 3,522
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS................. 2,062 2,062
WILSON LAKE, KS....................... 1,717 2,017
KENTUCKY
BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE, BARKLEY, KY & TN 10,393 10,393
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY................. 2,514 2,514
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY.................. 1,710 1,710
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY..................... 1,585 1,585
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY................... 1,737 1,737
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY..................... 926 926
DEWEY LAKE, KY........................ 1,775 1,775
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY...... 40 40
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY..................... 2,171 2,171
GRAYSON LAKE, KY...................... 1,709 1,709
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY........... 1,880 1,880
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 2,202 2,202
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY..... 665 665
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.................... 10 10
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY................. 1,927 1,927
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY................. 814 814
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY 113 113
NOLIN LAKE, KY........................ 2,477 2,477
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN 40,748 40,748
& OH.................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, 5,836 5,836
IN & OH..............................
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY.................. 1,231 1,231
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 2,742 2,742
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY................. 1,104 1,104
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY... 7,835 7,835
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY................... 1,143 1,143
LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, 11,640 11,640
BOEUF & BLACK, LA....................
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA............ 165 165
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA............ 954 954
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP 1,211 1,211
WATERWAY, LA.........................
BAYOU PIERRE, LA...................... 24 24
BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA........... 49 49
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILLION RIVER, LA.. 15 15
BAYOU TECHE, LA....................... 200 200
CADDO LAKE, LA........................ 224 224
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA.......... 17,968 23,968
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA.................. 2,235 2,235
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA........ 24,777 24,777
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA............ 2,569 2,569
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA..... 1,487 1,487
J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA....... 10,598 13,598
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA............ 22 500
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA............... 7 99
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA................... 1,913 1,913
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, 2,838 2,838
LA...................................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE 54,994 54,994
GULF OF MEXICO,......................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA......... 65 65
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA......... 1,410 1,410
WALLACE LAKE, LA...................... 244 244
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA.. 47 47
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO 48 48
BAYOU DULAC, LA......................
MAINE
BASS HARBOR, TREMONT, ME.............. ............... 60
BUCKS HARBOR, MACHIASPORT, ME......... ............... 750
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME.......... 1,000 1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME..... 215 215
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES, ME....... 17 17
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME......... 750 750
MARYLAND
ASSATEAGUE, MD........................ 1,000 ...............
BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNEL (50 15,513 20,000
FOOT), MD............................
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL).. 360 360
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV....... 177 177
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD..... 155 155
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV....... 1,779 1,779
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND ............... 1,400
SINEPUXENT BAY, MD...................
POPLAR ISLAND, MD..................... 8,200 ...............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD......... 400 400
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD... 108 108
SOMERSET COUNTY CHANNELS, MD.......... ............... 1,000
WICOMICO RIVER, MD.................... 1,676 1,676
MASSACHUSETTS
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA................... 753 753
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA.................... 1,203 1,203
BOSTON HARBOR, MA..................... 7,000 7,000
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 836 836
CAPE COD CANAL, MA.................... 13,263 13,263
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE 275 275
AREA, MA.............................
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA................. 210 210
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA............... 950 950
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA................ 567 567
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA..... 414 414
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA................... 1,421 1,421
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 889 889
NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA.. 500 500
NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET 619 619
HURRICANE BARRIER,...................
NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA................ ............... 350
PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA................... 200 200
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA......... 1,200 1,200
TULLY LAKE, MA........................ 666 666
WEST HILL DAM, MA..................... 572 572
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA.................... 784 784
MICHIGAN
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI........ 1,636 1,636
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI................. 203 203
DETROIT RIVER, MI..................... 5,415 5,415
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI................ 820 820
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI.................... 2,151 2,151
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI..... 158 158
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI................. 37 37
MICHIGAN HARBOR DREDGING, MI.......... ............... 7,000
ALPENA HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
ARCADIA HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
AU SABLE, MI...................... ............... ...............
BAY PORT HARBOR, MI............... ............... ...............
BIG BAY HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
BLACK RIVER (GOGEBIC), MI......... ............... ...............
BOLLES HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
CLINTON RIVER, MI................. ............... ...............
EAGLE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
INLAND ROUTE, MI.................. ............... ...............
LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
LELAND HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI.. ............... ...............
LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
MANISTEE HARBOR, MI............... ............... ...............
MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI............. ............... ...............
MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
PENTWATER HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI.......... ............... ...............
PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
PORTAGE HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
ROUGE RIVER, MI................... ............... ...............
SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI............. ............... ...............
ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI.................. 1,122 1,122
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI............... 335 335
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI......... 410 410
SAGINAW RIVER, MI..................... 3,624 3,624
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI................... 1,200 1,200
ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI................... 533 533
ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI................. 755 755
ST. MARYS RIVER, MI................... 23,010 23,010
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 2,612 2,612
WATERS, MI...........................
MINNESOTA
BIGSTONE LAKE--WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & 276 276
SD...................................
DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI....... 5,985 5,985
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN..... 633 633
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, 627 627
MN...................................
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................... 256 256
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 44,130 44,130
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS................
ORWELL LAKE, MN....................... 533 533
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN......... 82 82
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN................ 150 150
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 3,398 3,398
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 359 359
WATERS, MN...........................
TWO HARBORS, MN....................... 350 350
MISSISSIPPI
BILOXI HARBOR, MS..................... 1,250 1,250
CLAIRBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS............ 2 74
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS........ 187 187
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS................... 3,470 5,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS..... 183 183
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS.............. 40 112
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS.................... 1,703 1,703
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS................. 7,505 10,900
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA.................. 193 193
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS......... 75 75
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS................... 15 600
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS. 66 66
YAZOO RIVER, MS....................... 35 154
MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO............. 40 800
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN 6,813 6,813
LAKE, MO.............................
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO................... 2,933 3,018
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO.. 9,393 9,393
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO..... 1,491 1,491
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO........... 845 845
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO.................. 949 949
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND 23,403 23,403
MISSOURI RIVERS (R...................
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO................. 90 400
NEW MADRID HARBOR (MILE 889), MO...... 40 240
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO............... 2,231 2,231
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO... 327 327
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO................... 1,850 1,850
STOCKTON LAKE, MO..................... 4,370 4,370
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR.............. 7,550 7,550
UNION LAKE, MO........................ 6 6
MONTANA
FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT............. 6,361 6,361
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT..... 115 115
LIBBY DAM, MT......................... 1,948 1,948
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT... 145 145
NEBRASKA
GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK 8,165 8,165
LAKE, NE AND SD......................
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE................ 2,312 2,312
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE..... 714 714
PAPILLION CREEK, NE................... 847 847
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE........ 1,079 1,079
NEVADA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV..... 63 63
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, CA & NV............ 1,192 1,192
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV.... 341 341
NEW HAMPSHIRE
BLACKWATER DAM, NH.................... 610 610
COCHECO RIVER DREDGING PROJECT, NH.... ............... 2,000
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH............. 560 560
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH................ 1,921 1,921
HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH........... 1,148 1,148
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH..... 126 126
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH.................. 553 553
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA 500 500
RIVER, NH............................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH......... 275 275
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH............... 760 760
NEW JERSEY
ABSECON INLET, NJ..................... ............... 250
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.................... 225 225
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ.. 200 ...............
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ................. 250 250
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ.......... 15 15
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE 19,600 19,600
SEA, NJ, PA & DE.....................
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO 820 820
TRENTON, NJ..........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ..... 205 205
LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY 400 ...............
POINT, NJ............................
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ................... 160 160
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ.. 250 250
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC 150 150
RIVERS, NJ...........................
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ 553 553
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ......... 1,653 1,653
RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, 200 200
NJ...................................
RARITAN RIVER, NJ..................... 120 500
SALEM RIVER, NJ....................... 100 100
SHARK RIVER, NJ....................... 400 400
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ.... 80 80
NEW MEXICO
ABIQUIU DAM, NM....................... 3,305 3,305
COCHITI LAKE, NM...................... 6,876 6,876
CONCHAS LAKE, NM...................... 1,796 1,796
GALISTEO DAM, NM...................... 591 591
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM..... 639 639
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM.................. 756 756
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES 3,150 3,150
COLLABORATIVE PRO....................
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM........... 1,099 1,099
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM... 477 477
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM.................... 404 404
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS 4,188 4,188
MODEL STUDY, NM......................
NEW YORK
ALMOND LAKE, NY....................... 524 524
ARKPORT DAM, NY....................... 298 298
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA 1,503 1,503
HARBOR, NY...........................
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY.................... 1,325 1,325
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY................ 1,760 1,760
EAST RIVER, NY........................ 300 300
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY............... 2,950 2,950
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY.................. 588 588
EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 4,090 4,090
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY.. 150 150
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY............ 60 60
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, S.I., NY.......... 60 60
GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY................... 60 60
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY.............. 60 60
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT).............. 1,270 1,270
HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C).............. 1,550 1,550
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY..... 898 898
JAMAICA BAY, NY....................... 220 220
JONES INLET, NY....................... 150 150
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............... 100 100
LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY........... 5 5
LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY. 100 100
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY.................. 60 60
MORICHES INLET, NY.................... 100 100
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY.................. 2,696 2,696
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY.. 4,100 4,100
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY................... 3,698 3,698
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (PREVENTION 1,045 1,045
OF OBSTRUCTIVE DE....................
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT 7,000 7,000
REMOVAL).............................
NEWTOWN CREEK, NY..................... 150 150
OGDENSBURG HARBOR, NY................. ............... 70
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY..................... ............... 300
PORT CHESTER HARBOR, NY............... 60 60
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY......... 2,123 2,123
ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY.................. 5 5
SHINNECOCK INLET, NY.................. 100 100
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL 807 807
PROJECTS, NY.........................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 579 579
WATERS, NY...........................
WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 100 100
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY................ 685 685
NORTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC.... 4,300 4,300
B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.... 1,898 1,898
BEAUFORT HARBOR, NC................... ............... 250
BOGUE INLET, NC....................... ............... 650
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC.. 988 988
CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC.............. ............... 500
FALLS LAKE, NC........................ 1,859 1,859
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC..... 244 244
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC............. ............... 600
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC........... 3,945 3,945
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING 2,300 2,300
CHANNELS, NC.........................
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC.............. 9,500 9,500
NEW RIVER INLET, NC................... 700 700
NEW TOPSAIL INLET, NC................. ............... 600
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC......... 295 295
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC................. 50 50
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC................ 250 250
W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC... 3,421 3,421
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. 12,155 12,155
NORTH DAKOTA
BOWMAN HALEY, ND...................... 350 350
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND...... 14,746 14,946
HOMME LAKE, ND........................ 252 252
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND..... 452 452
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND... 1,351 1,351
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND..................... 496 496
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND... 138 138
SOURIS RIVER, ND...................... 286 286
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 35 35
WATERS, ND...........................
OHIO
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,545 1,545
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH.................. 840 1,840
BERLIN LAKE, OH....................... 2,198 2,198
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH................. 1,500 1,500
CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM, OH............. 1,145 1,145
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH.................. 7,357 8,357
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH................... 1,191 1,191
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,481 1,481
DELAWARE LAKE, OH..................... 1,322 1,322
DILLON LAKE, OHIO..................... 1,366 1,366
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH..... 555 555
LORAIN HARBOR, OH..................... 880 880
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 37 37
MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 1,089 1,089
OH...................................
MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH......... 1,727 1,727
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH............... 995 995
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH............. 7,306 7,306
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH.. 274 274
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH.................. 1,216 1,216
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH......... 295 295
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 35 35
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH................... 1,465 1,465
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 234 234
WATERS, OH...........................
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH..................... 5,034 6,034
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH................... 894 894
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH...... 745 745
WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH............ 1,029 1,029
OKLAHOMA
ARCADIA LAKE, OK...................... 521 521
BIRCH LAKE, OK........................ 902 902
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK................... 3,202 3,202
CANTON LAKE, OK....................... 2,217 2,217
COPAN LAKE, OK........................ 1,035 1,035
EUFAULA LAKE, OK...................... 6,620 6,620
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK.................. 11,768 11,768
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK.................. 1,104 1,104
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK............ 347 347
HEYBURN LAKE, OK...................... 748 748
HUGO LAKE, OK......................... 1,738 1,738
HULAH LAKE, OK........................ 2,097 2,097
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK..... 255 255
KAW LAKE, OK.......................... 2,751 2,751
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK..................... 6,947 6,947
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 6,173 6,173
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK................
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK...................... 4,106 4,106
OPTIMA LAKE, OK....................... 219 219
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE 114 114
CHEROKEES, OK........................
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK................... 1,276 1,276
ROBERT S. KEER LOCK AND DAM AND 8,441 8,441
RESERVOIR, OK........................
SARDIS LAKE, OK....................... 1,254 1,254
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK... 900 900
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK..................... 1,414 1,414
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK.............. 6,625 6,625
WAURIKA LAKE, OK...................... 1,431 1,431
WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM, OK.......... 5,903 5,903
WISTER LAKE, OK....................... 856 856
OREGON
APPLEGATE LAKE, OR.................... 1,302 1,302
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR................... 940 940
BONNEVILLE LOCK & DAM, OR & WA........ 13,911 13,911
CHETCO RIVER, OR...................... 909 909
COLUMBIA & LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER 24,495 24,495
BELOW VANCOUVER, WA..................
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA.. 12,945 12,945
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA & 689 689
THE DALLES, OR.......................
COOS BAY, OR.......................... 4,591 5,043
COQUILLE RIVER, OR.................... 339 339
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR................ 1,130 1,130
COUGAR LAKE, OR....................... 1,582 1,582
DEPOE BAY, OR......................... ............... 118
DETROIT LAKE, OR...................... 949 949
DORENA LAKE, OR....................... 1,160 1,160
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR................... 1,864 1,864
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR................... 2,362 2,362
GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR......... 3,650 3,650
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR.................. 843 843
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 34 34
PROJECTS, OR.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR..... 636 636
JOHN DAY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA.......... 8,901 8,901
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR................ 2,766 2,766
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR................... 3,636 3,636
MCNARY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA............ 7,137 7,137
PORT ORFORD, OR....................... 38 38
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR......... 200 200
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR......... 565 565
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR... 69 69
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR..................... 647 647
SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR.................. 6 6
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 10,400 10,400
WATERS, OR...........................
TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR............. 48 48
UMPQUA RIVER, OR...................... 1,174 1,174
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, 87 918
OR...................................
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR.. 41 41
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR................. 629 629
YAQUINA BAY & HARBOR, OR.............. 1,790 1,790
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA................... 9,039 9,039
ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA................. 659 659
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA............. 215 215
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA................... 1,201 1,201
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA................... 2,696 2,696
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA.............. 1,253 1,253
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA................... 1,889 1,889
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA................ 1,683 1,683
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA................. 757 757
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA.... 1,524 1,524
ERIE HARBOR, PA....................... 555 555
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA.......... 674 674
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA.............. 969 969
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND 224 224
RESERVOIR, PA........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA..... 880 880
JOHNSTOWN, PA......................... 34 34
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA 1,338 1,338
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA................... 1,346 1,346
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,286 1,286
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................. 16,758 16,758
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV 21,470 21,470
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & 516 516
WV...................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA......... 120 120
PROMPTON LAKE, PA..................... 434 434
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA...................... 22 22
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA..................... 3,847 3,847
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA... 59 59
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA.................. 200 200
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA............... 6,992 6,992
STILLWATER LAKE, PA................... 452 452
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 98 98
WATERS, PA...........................
TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA............... 2,456 2,456
TIONESTA LAKE, PA..................... 1,812 1,812
UNION CITY LAKE, PA................... 440 440
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,041 1,041
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA.............. 478 478
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD...... 2,335 2,335
PUERTO RICO
SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR................... 1,200 1,200
RHODE ISLAND
BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI..... ............... 1,250
FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI....... 500 500
GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (NEW 100 200
HARBOR)..............................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI..... 48 48
PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT ............... 200
BAY & WATCH HILL.....................
POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI..... 300 300
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI......... 500 500
PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI ............... 300
WOONSOCKET, RI........................ 200 200
SOUTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC.... 795 1,295
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC\1\.............. 12,492 10,694
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC... 4,685 4,685
GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC................. 250 1,250
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC..... 70 70
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC......... 465 465
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD......... 9,873 9,873
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER ............... 3,000
BRULE SIOUX, SD......................
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD................... 436 436
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD........... 271 271
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, 12,210 12,210
SD...................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD..... 75 75
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN................ 598 598
OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND.......... 11,816 11,816
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD... 81 81
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN.................. 6,143 6,143
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN............. 6,454 6,454
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 3,775 3,775
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN.... 6,813 6,813
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN.................. 6,386 6,386
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN..... 50 50
J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN. 4,818 4,818
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN.......... 12,304 12,304
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN................... 16,833 16,833
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN................. 373 373
TEXAS
AQUILLA LAKE, TX...................... 1,564 1,564
ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE 1,558 1,558
CONTROL-AREA VIII,...................
BARDWELL LAKE, TX..................... 2,229 2,229
BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 4,968 4,968
BELTON LAKE, TX....................... 3,280 3,280
BENBROOK LAKE, TX..................... 2,575 2,575
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX.............. 3,388 3,388
BUFFALO BAYOU & TRIBUTARIES, TX....... 2,958 2,958
CANYON LAKE, TX....................... 4,005 4,005
CEDAR BAYOU, TX....................... 1,790 1,790
CHANNEL TO HARLINGEN, TX.............. 2,161 2,161
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX........... 383 383
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... 4,523 4,523
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX & OK..... 7,676 7,676
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL 43 43
PROJECT, TX..........................
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE 3,485 3,485
PINES, TX............................
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................... 3,316 3,316
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX...... 13,095 13,095
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX......... 2,264 2,264
GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX............. 1,733 1,733
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX.............. 2,588 2,588
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX.................... 2,735 2,735
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX........ 26,046 26,046
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX.................. 1,605 1,605
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 15,063 15,063
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX..... 1,520 1,520
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX.................. 1,718 1,718
JOE POOL LAKE, TX..................... 1,096 1,096
LAKE KEMP, TX......................... 327 327
LAVON LAKE, TX........................ 3,497 3,497
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX.................... 3,549 3,549
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX............ 4,627 4,627
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX................ 4,168 4,168
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE 2,382 2,382
GEORGETOWN, TX.......................
O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX........... 1,164 1,164
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX.................... 1,208 1,208
PROCTOR LAKE, TX...................... 2,324 2,324
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX......... 223 223
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX.................. 1,324 1,324
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX............ 13,399 13,399
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX..... 6,247 6,247
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX... 149 149
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX................... 3,366 3,366
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX............. 2,096 2,096
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX........... 4,000 4,000
TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX. 100 1,000
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, 2,505 2,505
TX...................................
WACO LAKE, TX......................... 3,711 3,711
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX.................. 2,114 2,114
WHITNEY LAKE, TX...................... 8,348 8,348
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX........ 3,517 3,517
UTAH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT..... 84 84
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT... 594 594
VERMONT
BALL MOUNTAIN, VT..................... 858 858
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT..... 109 109
NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY.... 85 85
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT............... 772 772
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT............ 854 854
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT.................... 814 814
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT................. 627 627
VIRGINIA
APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA.................. ............... 500
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, 2,620 2,620
VA...................................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, 991 1,311
VA...................................
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA................ 913 913
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA..... 2,323 2,323
HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS 882 882
HARBOR, VA (DRIF.....................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA..... 369 369
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA............... 4,479 4,479
JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA & NC............ 11,585 11,585
JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 2,104 2,104
VA...................................
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA................... 277 277
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA.................... 11,343 11,343
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA.... 630 630
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA & NC................ 5,638 5,638
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA......... 850 850
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, VA......... 50 50
RUDEE INLET, VA....................... 795 795
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA. 104 104
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA. 201 201
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA.................. 790 790
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR.. 86 727
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND 7 847
SAND ISLAND, WA......................
EDIZ HOOK, WA......................... 730 730
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA 1,766 1,766
FRIDAY HARBOR, WA..................... 111 111
GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA... 11,140 11,140
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA................. 3,694 3,694
ICE HARBOR LOCK & DAM, WA............. 5,828 5,828
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 74 74
PROJECTS, WA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA..... 725 725
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA........ 9,246 9,246
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK & DAM, WA........... 2,551 2,551
LOWER GRANITE LOCK & DAM, WA.......... 7,651 7,651
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK & DAM, WA....... 2,735 6,735
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA................... 3,834 3,834
MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA... 279 279
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA.................. 3,056 3,056
NEAH BAY, WA.......................... 67 67
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA......... 524 524
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA.. 1,011 1,011
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA.................. 266 266
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA... 537 537
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA.................... 172 172
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA............... 165 165
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 50 50
WATERS, WA...........................
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA............ 130 130
THE DALLES LOCK & DAM, WA & OR........ 8,769 8,769
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA.......... 40 40
WEST VIRGINIA
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV................... 1,405 1,405
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.................... 1,661 1,661
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV................... 2,246 2,246
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV.................... 2,167 2,167
ELKINS, WV............................ 15 15
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV..... 336 336
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS & DAM, WV......... 14,089 14,089
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH 35,276 35,276
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & 2,996 2,996
OH...................................
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV................... 1,927 1,927
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............ 1,148 1,148
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV................. 3,234 3,234
SUTTON LAKE, WV....................... 2,413 2,413
TYGART LAKE, WV....................... 1,478 1,478
WISCONSIN
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI.............. 888 888
FOX RIVER, WI......................... 2,421 4,421
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI.................. 3,459 6,459
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI..... 91 91
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI................... 40 40
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI......... 283 283
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN 20 20
SHIP CANAL, WI.......................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 388 388
WATERS, WI...........................
WYOMING
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 10 10
PROJECTS, WV.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY..... 25 25
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY............... 877 877
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY... 118 118
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED BY 2,317,027 2,366,322
STATE..........................
REMAINING ITEMS:
ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE 8,000 5,000
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE........
AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH. 690 690
ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND 4,750 4,750
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE............
BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M 6,792 6,792
BUSINESS LINES...................
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM.... 3,000 3,000
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECTS ............... ...............
NOT REQUIRING SPECIFIC...........
BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED 9,175 ...............
MATERIAL (SECTION 204/145).......
NATIONAL MITIGATION PROJECTS ............... 9,043
(SECTION 111)....................
RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT 5,000 2,500
CORPS PROJECTS...................
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/ 2,500 2,500
CURATION)........................
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE.... 12,000 12,000
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE...... 12,000 12,000
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE 1,150 1,150
MONITORING SYSTEM................
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND 7,000 7,000
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (DOE...
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL 2,000 2,000
SUPPORT PROGRAM [DOTS]...........
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION 270 270
PROGRAM..........................
FACILITY PROTECTION............... 7,000 7,000
FERC HYDROPOWER COORDINATION...... 3,000 3,000
FISH AND WILDLIFEOPERATING FISH 4,700 4,700
HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT...........
GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT 1,200 1,200
MODEL............................
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS. 3,800 3,800
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS..... 1,780 1,780
LONG-TERM OPTION ASSESSMENTFOR LOW 1,500 1,500
USE NAVIGATION...................
MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION 1,800 1,800
PROJECTS.........................
NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM.. 7,000 12,000
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM....... 18,000 18,000
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 7,000 7,000
PROGRAM [NEPP]...................
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY.. 10,000 10,000
NATIONAL (MULTI PROJECT) NATURAL 4,230 4,230
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT.............
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR 571 571
REALLOCATION.....................
NATIONWIDE EVALUATION OF 2,000 2,000
HYDROPOWER REHAB.................
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL 300 300
SUPPORT [ABS-P2,WINABS]..........
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION:
REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS......... 500 500
PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN 50 50
CHANNELS (SEC 3).................
WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS.... 4,771 4,771
HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA 825 825
COLLECTION.......................
RECREATION ONE STOP [R1S] NATIONAL 65 65
RECREATION RESERVAT..............
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT 2,000 5,000
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM............
HAWAII RSM, HI................ ............... (500)
SOUTHEAST OAHU REGIONAL ............... (500)
SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, HI......
NORTH CAROLINA RSM, NJ........ ............... (600)
DELAWARE ESTUARY RSM, NJ...... ............... (200)
SOUTH COASTAL RHODE ISLAND ............... (750)
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.
CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEWPOINT ............... (350)
COMFORT, MATHEWS COUNTY,.....
RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR 608 608
MAJOR REHAB......................
RESERVE FOR KEY EMERGENCY 20,000 ...............
MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS..............
SHORELINE USE PERMIT STUDY........ 250 250
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 653 653
[WOTS]...........................
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, FOR ITEMS NOT LISTED 186,973 151,255
UNDER STATES...................
REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.... ............... -67,577
---------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 2,504,000 2,450,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kodiak Harbor, Alaska.--The Committee recommendation
includes $240,000 to secure environmental clearances and
prepare contract documents for St. Herman's Harbor and St. Paul
Harbor.
Petersberg Harbor, Alaska.--$500,000 is recommended to
obtain environmental clearances and prepare contract plans and
specifications.
Arkansas Lakes, Arkansas.--The Committee recommendation
includes an increase of $500,000 each for DeGray Lake, Lake
Greeson and Lake Ouachita, to provide adequate levels of
service and for backlog maintenance items.
Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.--The Committee recommends
$800,000 for maintenance dredging of this harbor.
Marina Del Rey, California.--The Committee recommends
$3,000,000 for dredging this project, the largest man-made
harbor in the United States with nearly 6,000 boat slips and
home to a U.S. Coast Guard Cutter.
Norwalk Harbor, CT.--The Committee recommends $1,000,000
for the Phase III maintenance dredging of the harbor.
Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach,
Delaware.--The Committee has included funding for this project
in the construction account.
Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, Delaware.--The Committee
recommends $200,000 to update existing preliminary design and
condition survey.
Wilmington Harbor, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation
includes $2,320,000 for this project. Additional funds
recommended above the budget request are for maintenance of
disposal areas and additional dredging.
Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee to Anclote,
Florida.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for maintenance
dredging.
Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.--The Committee recommendation
includes $6,035,000 for routine maintenance and $1,000,000 is
included in the CG account for Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities [DMDF].
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Georgia.--$1,000,000 is
recommended for dredging critical areas of this waterway as
well as for work related to new upland disposal sites.
Savannah Harbor, Georgia.--The Committee recommendation for
Savannah Harbor includes $14,187,000 for routine maintenance
and $900,000 is included in the CG account for Dredged material
Disposal Facilities [DMDF].
Chicago Harbor, Illinois.--The Committee is aware of the
city of Chicago's interest in modifying the existing Chicago
Lakefront Inner Breakwater consistent with the city of
Chicago's 2016 Olympic Master Plan for Chicago Harbor. The
Committee encourages the Chicago District of the Army Corps of
Engineers to continue to work with the city of Chicago on the
city's proposal.
Illinois River Waterway, Illinois and Indiana (MVR
Portion).--The Committee has recommended $900,000 above the
budget request for small boat harbor dredging in western
Illinois.
Calumet Harbor and River, Illinois.--The Committee
recommendation includes $3,120,000 for routine maintenance and
$1,501,000 is included in the CG account for DMDF.
Indiana Harbor Confined Disposal Facility, Indiana.--Funds
for this project have been included in the CG account.
Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.--The Committee has
included additional funds for dredging needs on this project.
J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.--The Committee has
included additional funds above the budget request for backlog
maintenance and dredging needs.
Assateague, Maryland.--The Committee has included funding
for this project in the construction account.
Poplar Island, Maryland.--The Committee has included
funding for this project in the construction account.
Somerset County Channels, Maryland.--The Committee
recommendation includes $1,000,000 for additional dredging
needs at these harbors that service watermen and the Maryland
seafood industry.
Michigan Harbor Dredging, Michigan.--The Committee notes
that there are some 50 Federally maintained harbors and
waterways in Michigan. However, the Committee also notes that
fewer than 20 are budgeted. With the limited funding available
to the Committee, the Committee has recommended $7,000,000
under this line item to provide for some of the dredging needs
of the State rather than trying to fund small amounts for each
project. The Committee has listed all of the harbors and
waterways in the table that are eligible for this funding.
However, recognizing that conditions on these small waterways
is constantly changing and the Great Lakes are suffering from
near historic low water levels, the Committee is directing the
Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2010 that
would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for
these harbor and waterway projects.
Mouth of the Yazoo River, Mississippi.--The Committee
includes additional funds for the maintenance dredging of the
entrance to the Vicksburg Harbor.
Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee has
recommended $10,900,000 for this project. Additional funds
above the budget request are recommended to perform additional
dredging and maintenance of the entrance and main channels.
Rosedale Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee recommendation
includes $600,000 for maintenance dredging of the harbor.
Absecon Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends
$250,000 for dredging of the inlet.
Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, New Jersey.--The
Committee has included funding for this project in the
construction account.
Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.--The
Committee has included funding for this project in the
construction account.
Ogdensburg Harbor, New York.--The Committee recommends
$70,000 to provide for Sediment Sampling and Analysis in order
to perform a tiered evaluation and characterize the channel
material for dredging and establish appropriate disposal
methods for the dredged material.
Oswego Harbor, New York.--The Committee recommends $300,000
to perform Engineering and Design for the East and West
Arrowhead Breakwater Repair.
Coastal Inlets, North Carolina.--The Committee has included
additional funds for the coastal inlets on the North Carolina
coast that were not funded in the administration's budget
request. With the limited funding available to the Committee,
the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging
needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on
these inlets are constantly changing the Committee is directing
the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2010
that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available
for these inlets.
Garrison Dam and Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The
Committee recommends $100,000 for mosquito control in the
Williston area due to the shallow-water mosquito breeding areas
created by the impoundment of Lake Sakakawea.
Ohio Great Lakes Harbor.--The Committee has included
additional funds for a number of the Great Lakes Harbors in
Ohio that were underfunded in the administration's budget
request. With the limited funding available to the Committee,
the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging
need of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on
these inlets are constantly changing the Committee is directing
the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2010
that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available
for these harbors.
Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oregon.--The
Committee recommends $918,000 for this project. Funds above the
budget request are for minimal seasonal lock operation for
commercial and recreational users and to prepare a design
report for comprehensive rehab of lock facility.
Block Island, Harbor of Refuge, Rhode Island.--The
Committee has recommended $1,250,000 to advertise and award a
fully funded contract to repair the east bulkhead.
Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.--The Committee
recommendation includes $10,694,000 for routine maintenance and
$1,798,000 is included in the CG account for DMDF.
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, South
Dakota.--The Committee notes that title VI of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999, as amended, requires that
funding to inventory and stabilize cultural and historic sites
along the Missouri River in South Dakota, and to carry out the
terrestrial wildlife habitat programs, shall be provided from
the O&M account. The Committee provides $3,000,000 to protect
cultural resource sites and provide funding to the State and
tribes for approved restoration and stewardship plans and in
compliance with the requirements of title VI, directs the Corps
to contract with or reimburse the State of South Dakota and
affected tribes to carry out these duties.
Texas Water Allocation Assessment, Texas.--$1,000 is
recommended to continue these studies to determine if existing
water can be better allocated to support more balanced water
use in light of future needs.
Appomattox River, VA.--The committee recommends $500,000 to
complete environmental testing and analysis and obtain
environmental permits.
Chinook, Head of Sand Island, and Baker Bay, Washington.--
The Committee notes the proximity of Corps navigation
facilities on the Columbia River between Chinook and the Head
of Sand Island, Washington, and at Baker Bay, Washington, and
encourage the Corps of Engineers to seek ways to achieve cost
savings and efficiency, such as by utilizing appropriate
contracting methods while having these two projects be
considered together when seeking bids and awarding contracts.
$1,574,000 is recommended for dredging at these harbors.
Mud Mountain Dam, Washington.--Within the funds
recommended, the Corps is directed to continue to satisfy
Federal fish passage obligations for the term of the
cooperative agreement with Puget Sound Energy.
Fox River, Wisconsin.--Additional funds recommended above
the budget request are to reimburse Wisconsin, in accordance
with the agreement, for the costs of repairs and rehabilitation
of the transferred locks and for the Corps of Engineers to
undertake major repairs for the dams and associated
infrastructure.
Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation
includes $3,000,000 above the budget request for backlog
maintenance and dredging needs.
Continuing Authorities Projects for Section 111 and Section
204.--These sections of the CAP are funded in the CG account
with the other parts of the CAP.
Response to Climate Change at Corps Projects.--A portion of
these funds were moved to the Coastal Data Information Program
in order to ensure that the period of record for coastal wave
information is maintained.
National Coastal Mapping.--$12,000,000 is recommended for
this program. Additional funds recommended above the budget
request are for LIDAR bathymetry for use in regional sediment
management and for Coastal Zone Mapping and Imaging LIDAR/LASER
to be conducted with the University of Southern Mississippi.
Regional Sediment Management Demonstration Program.--The
Committee has recommended $5,000,000 for this program,
$3,000,000 above the budget request. Within the funds
recommended, the Corps is directed to undertake studies for the
State of Hawaii; the Southeast Coast of Oahu, Hawaii; the State
of North Carolina; South Coastal Rhode Island; Delaware
Estuary, New Jersey; and for Chesapeake Bay, New Point Comfort,
Mathews County, Virginia.
Reserve for Key Emergency Maintenance/Repairs.--The
Committee has recommended no funding for this item. The
Committee believes it is critical for Corps Headquarters to
retain a maintenance reserve. Therefore, a proviso in the
operation and maintenance section of the bill is included to
address this need.
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... (\1\)
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 41,000
Committee recommendation................................................
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $3,680,290,000.
The Committee has recommended no funding for the Flood
Control and Coastal Emergencies account. Readiness and
preparedness activities have been funded through supplemental
appropriations acts. This account provides funds for
preparedness activities for natural and other disasters,
response, and emergency flood fighting and rescue operations,
hurricane response, and emergency shore protection work. It
also provides for emergency supplies of clean water where the
source has been contaminated or where adequate supplies of
water are needed for consumption.
REGULATORY PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$183,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 190,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 190,000,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $25,000,000.
An appropriation of $190,000,000 is recommended for the
regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers.
This appropriation provides for salaries and costs incurred
administering regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters,
including wetlands, in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 33 U.S.C. section 401, the Clean Water Act of 1977
Public Law 95-217, and the Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 Public Law 92-532.
The appropriation helps maintain program performance,
protects important aquatic resources, and supports partnerships
with States and local communities through watershed planning
efforts.
FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$140,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 134,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 140,000,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $100,000,000.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $140,000,000
to continue activities related to the FUSRAP in fiscal year
2005.
The responsibility for the cleanup of contaminated sites
under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program was
transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers in the fiscal year
1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public
Law 105-62.
FUSRAP is not specifically defined by statute. The program
was established in 1974 under the broad authority of the Atomic
Energy Act and, until fiscal year 1998, funds for the cleanup
of contaminated defense sites had been appropriated to the
Department of Energy through existing appropriation accounts.
In appropriating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the
Committee intended to transfer only the responsibility for
administration and execution of cleanup activities at eligible
sites where remediation had not been completed. It did not
intend to transfer ownership of and accountability for real
property interests that remain with the Department of Energy.
The Corps of Engineers has extensive experience in the
cleanup of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes through its
work for the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies.
The Committee always intended for the Corps' expertise be used
in the same manner for the cleanup of contaminated sites under
FUSRAP. The Committee expects the Corps to continue programming
and budgeting for FUSRAP as part of the Corps of Engineers--
Civil program. The Committee directs the Corps to prioritize
sites that are nearing completion during fiscal year 2008.
The Corps is directed to prioritize sites that are nearing
completion. The Committee directs the Corps of Engineers during
fiscal year 2010 to complete the Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study of the former Sylvania nuclear fuel site at
Hicksville, New York and to proceed expeditiously to a Record
of Decision and, if appropriate, initiate any necessary
remediation in accordance with CERCLA. The Secretary of the
Army shall submit a report to the Committees on Appropriations
of the House of Representatives and the Senate detailing the
progress not later than 120 days after enactment of this act.
GENERAL EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $179,365,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 184,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 186,000,000
This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office,
Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research
and statistical functions of the Corps of Engineers. The
Committee recommendation is $186,000,000.
Executive Direction and Management.--The Office of the
Chief of Engineers and 8 division offices supervise work in 38
district offices.
Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity.--This support
center provides administrative services (such as personnel,
logistics, information management, and finance and accounting)
for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and other separate
field operating activities.
Institute for Water Resources.--This institute performs
studies, analyses, and develops planning techniques for the
management and development of the Nation's water resources.
United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.--This
center provides centralized support for all Corps finance and
accounting.
Office of Congressional Affairs.--The Committee has
included statutory language for the past several years
prohibiting any funds from being used to fund an Office of
Congressional Affairs within the executive office of the Chief
of Engineers. The Committee believes that an Office of
Congressional Affairs for the Civil Works Program would hamper
the efficient and effective coordination of issues with the
Committee staff and Members of Congress. The Committee believes
that the technical knowledge and managerial expertise needed
for the Corps headquarters to effectively address Civil Works
authorization, appropriation, and headquarters policy matters
resides in the Civil Works organization. Therefore, the
Committee strongly recommends that the Office of Congressional
Affairs not be a part of the process by which information on
Civil Works projects, programs, and activities is provided to
Congress.
In 1998, The Chief of Engineers issued a Command Directive
transferring the oversight and management of the General
Expenses account, as well as the manpower associated with this
function, from the Civil Works Directorate to the Resource
Management Office. The Corps is reminded that General Expense
funds are appropriated solely for the executive management and
oversight of the Civil Works Program under the direction of the
Director of Civil Works.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS)
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $4,500,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 6,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,000,000
The Committee has recommended $5,000,000 for the Office of
the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) [OASA(CW)].
As has been previously stated, the Committee believes that this
office should be funded through the Defense appropriations bill
and directs the administration to budget for this office under
the Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance--Army
account in future budget submissions. It is the Committee's
opinion that the traditional role of the ASA(CW) is to provide
the Chief of Engineers advice about policy matters and
generally be the political spokesperson for the
administration's policies; however, the Chief of Engineers is
responsible for carrying out the program. This is underscored
by the administration's budget documents that state that the
OASA(CW) provides policy direction and oversight for the civil
works program and the Headquarters of the Corps provides
executive direction and management of the civil works program.
The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works advises
the Secretary of the Army on a variety of matters, including
the Civil Works program of the Corps of Engineers. The
Assistant Secretary is a member of the Army Secretariat with
responsibilities, such as participating in Continuity of
Government exercises that extend well beyond Civil Works. The
Assistant Secretary also oversees the administration, operation
and maintenance, and capital development of Arlington National
Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery.
Congressional oversight of the Army Cemetery program lies not
with the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, but
rather with the Appropriations Subcommittee on Military
Construction and Veterans Affairs and with the Committee on
Veterans Affairs.
The Army's accounting system does not track OMA funding of
overhead or Army-wide support offices on the basis of which
office receives support, nor would it be efficient or effective
to do so for a 20-person office. Instead, expenses such as
legal support, personnel services, finance and accounting
services, the executive motor pool, travel on military
aircraft, and other support services are centrally funded and
managed on a department-wide basis. Transferring the funding
for the expenses of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works to
a separate account has greatly complicated the Army's
accounting for such indirect and overhead expenses with no
commensurate benefit to justify the change. The Committee does
not agree that these costs should be funded in this bill and
therefore has only provided funding for salaries and expenses
as in previous years.
GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Section 101. The bill includes language concerning
reprogramming guidelines.
Section 102. The bill includes language prohibiting
implementation of competitive sourcing or HPO.
Section 103. The bill includes language concerning report
notifications.
Section 104. The bill includes language concerning
reallocations in Lake Cumberland, Kentucky.
Section 105. The bill includes language concerning
continuing contracts and the Inland Waterway Trust Fund.
Section 106. The bill contains language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 107. The bill contains language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 108. The bill contains language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 109. The bill contains language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 110 The bill contains language concerning a project
cost limit change.
Section 111. The bill contains language concerning a
reimbursement limit change.
Section 112. The bill contains language regarding Alaska
coastal erosion.
Section 113. The bill contains language making a correction
to a provision in WRDA 2007.
Section 114. The bill contains language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 115. The bill contains language concerning a
rescission of MR&T funds.
Section 116. The bill contains language concerning a
rescission of CG funds.
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Account
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $42,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 42,004,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,004,000
The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2010 to carry
out the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act
totals $42,004,000. An appropriation of $38,800,000 has been
provided for Central Utah project construction; $1,500,000 for
fish, wildlife, and recreation, mitigation and conservation.
The Committee recommendation provides $1,704,000 for program
administration and oversight.
Legislative language is included which allows up to
$1,500,000 of the funds provided to be used for administrative
costs.
The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II-VI of
Public Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the central
Utah project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District.
The Act also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish,
wildlife, recreation, mitigation, and conservation; establishes
an account in the Treasury for the deposit of these funds and
of other contributions for mitigation and conservation
activities; and establishes a Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission to administer funds in that account.
The act further assigns responsibilities for carrying out the
act to the Secretary of the Interior and prohibits delegation
of those responsibilities to the Bureau of Reclamation.
Bureau of Reclamation
WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$920,259,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 893,125,000
Committee recommendation................................ 993,125,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $1,000,000,000.
An appropriation of $993,125,000 is recommended by the
Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of
Reclamation. The water and related resources account supports
the development, management, and restoration of water and
related natural resources in the 17 Western States. The account
includes funds for operating and maintaining existing
facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to
protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to
improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work
will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal
entities and other Federal agencies.
The Committee has divided underfinancing between the
Resources Management Subaccount and the Facilities Operation
and Maintenance subaccount. The Committee directs that the
underfinancing amount in each subaccount initially be applied
uniformly across all projects within the subaccounts. Upon
applying the underfinanced amounts, normal reprogramming
procedures should be undertaken to account for schedule
slippages, accelerations, or other unforeseen conditions.
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
The Committee received more than 140 requests for projects,
programs, studies or activities for the Bureau of Reclamation
for fiscal year 2010. These requests included the budget
request as well as requests by Members. The Committee obviously
was unable to accommodate all of these requests.
In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding
provided in the Energy and Water bill, all disclosures are made
in the report accompanying the bill.
All of the projects funded in this report have gone through
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to
decide what not to fund.
There are two disclosure tables this year. One discloses
the recommended amounts that are in excess of those proposed in
the budget request and the Members names that made these
requests. If the Member requested the budget request or if only
the budget request was provided, Member names are not listed
next to these items because under the provisions of Rule 44
this would not be considered congressionally directed spending.
The second table discloses only those earmarks requested by the
President and the amounts recommended or the budget request
whichever is appropriated.
The purposes for the funding provided in the various
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each
account. The location of the programs, projects or studies are
denoted in the account tables.
The amounts recommended by the Committee are shown on the
following table along with the budget request.
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee
------------------------- recommendation
Project title -----------------------
Resources Facilities Resources Facilities
management OM&R management OM&R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA
AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT.................... ........... 10,600 .......... 10,600
ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT............................ 1,400 .......... 1,400 ..........
COLORADO RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT.................. 18,103 305 18,103 305
COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM..................... 2,350 .......... 2,350 ..........
NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................ 350 .......... 350 ..........
PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT....................... 200 .......... 200 ..........
SALT RIVER PROJECT............................................. 517 133 517 133
SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT................... 325 .......... 325 ..........
SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................... 1,000 .......... 1,000 ..........
SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT........... 1,703 .......... 1,703 ..........
YUMA AREA PROJECTS............................................. 1,327 23,173 1,327 23,173
LOAN FOR WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE, AZ....................... ........... .......... 3,209 ..........
CALIFORNIA
CACHUMA PROJECT................................................ 837 837 837 837
CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................. 500 .......... 500 ..........
CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT............. 1,400 .......... 1,400 ..........
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS:
AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION.................................... 1,681 7,895 1,681 7,895
AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT................................... 1,663 .......... 1,663 ..........
DELTA DIVISION............................................. 15,063 5,342 15,063 5,342
EAST SIDE DIVISION......................................... 1,676 2,750 1,676 2,750
FRIANT DIVISION............................................ 2,054 3,702 2,554 3,702
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS............................. 10,838 958 10,838 958
REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT........... ........... 25,000 .......... 25,000
SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION.................................. 15,517 1,379 15,517 1,379
SAN FELIPE DIVISION........................................ 1,635 16 1,635 16
SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION....................................... 356 .......... 7,356 ..........
SHASTA DIVISION............................................ 178 7,876 178 7,876
TRINITY RIVER DIVISION..................................... 7,310 3,185 7,310 3,185
WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS................................. 993 8,287 993 8,287
WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT................... 3,047 5,478 3,047 5,478
YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION............................ 450 .......... 450 ..........
INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT................. ........... .......... 100 ..........
IRVINE BASIN GROUND & SURFACE WATER............................ ........... .......... 100 ..........
LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS................................... 102 .......... 2,602 ..........
LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT............ 1,400 .......... 1,400 ..........
LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............... 700 .......... 700 ..........
MOKELUMNE RIVER REGIONAL WATER STORAGE & CONJUNCTIVE U........ ........... .......... 500 ..........
ORLAND PROJECT................................................. ........... 703 .......... 703
SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT.................................... 400 .......... 400 ..........
SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION PROGRAM....................... 3,500 .......... 3,500 ..........
SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT...................................... 1,400 .......... 1,400 ..........
SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.............. 208 .......... 208 ..........
SOBABO WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT PROJECT......................... 5,000 .......... 10,000 ..........
SOLANO PROJECT................................................. 1,612 2,497 1,612 2,497
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM..................... 520 .......... 520 ..........
VENTURA RIVER PROJECT.......................................... 397 195 397 195
COLORADO
ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT........................................ 53,743 445 53,743 445
COLLBRAN PROJECT............................................... 190 3,695 190 3,695
COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT.................................. 405 13,395 405 13,395
COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 300 .......... 300 ..........
FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT....................................... 99 160 99 160
FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT..................................... 252 8,398 252 8,398
GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II............................ 170 1,307 170 1,307
LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY.............................. 30 2,935 30 2,935
LOWER COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......................... 250 .......... 250 ..........
MANCOS PROJECT................................................. 71 107 71 107
PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II.......................... 64 2,282 64 2,282
PINE RIVER PROJECT............................................. 189 157 189 157
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT........................................ 244 4,636 244 4,636
UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT............................................ 228 140 228 140
UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM........................ 250 .......... 250 ..........
IDAHO
BOISE AREA PROJECTS............................................ 3,086 2,315 3,086 2,315
COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT FCRPS......... 18,000 .......... 18,000 ..........
IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................... 300 .......... 300 ..........
LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS..................................... 1,234 30 1,234 30
MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS......................................... 2,736 4,432 2,736 4,432
KANSAS
KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................. 25 .......... 25 ..........
WICHITA PROJECT--CHENEY DIVISION............................... 10 395 10 395
WICHITA PROJECT--EQUUS BEDS DIVISION........................... 50 .......... 2,050 ..........
MONTANA
FORT PECK DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM....................... 4,000 .......... 14,000 ..........
HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT........................................... ........... 1,865 .......... 1,865
HUNTLEY PROJECT................................................ 31 56 31 56
LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT...................................... 532 15 532 15
MILK RIVER PROJECT............................................. 314 1,486 314 1,486
MILK RIVER/ST. MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT........... 2,500 .......... 4,000 ..........
MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS......................................... 140 .......... 140 ..........
ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM............ 1,000 .......... 16,000 ..........
SUN RIVER PROJECT.............................................. 50 328 50 328
NEBRASKA
MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT........................................... 16 119 16 119
NEVADA
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS [NORTH LAS VEGAS, WATER REUSE]......... ........... .......... 2,000 ..........
HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY..................................... 125 .......... 125 ..........
LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT......................................... 4,745 2,531 4,745 2,531
LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM............................... 800 .......... 2,000 ..........
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER & RECLAMATION REUSE............... ........... .......... 500 ..........
CARLSBAD PROJECT............................................... 2,615 1,104 2,615 1,104
CHIMAYO, NM.................................................... ........... .......... 500 ..........
EASTERN NEW MEXICO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM...................... 50 .......... 50 ..........
EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY.......................... ........... .......... 500 ..........
JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM................ 1,000 .......... 5,000 ..........
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT...................................... 14,801 8,949 14,961 8,949
NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY..................................... ........... .......... 7,791 ..........
NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 200 .......... 200 ..........
PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT........................ ........... 209 .......... 209
RIO GRANDE PROJECT............................................. 824 4,175 824 4,175
SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................... 150 .......... 150 ..........
SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INV. PROGRAM.................... 150 .......... 150 ..........
TUCUMCARI PROJECT.............................................. 24 17 24 17
UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS.......................... 75 .......... 75 ..........
NORTH DAKOTA
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION.................. 30,654 5,639 64,361 5,639
OKLAHOMA
ARBUCKLE PROJECT............................................... 48 186 48 186
MCGEE CREEK PROJECT............................................ 20 644 20 644
MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT.......................................... 7 518 7 518
NORMAN PROJECT................................................. 25 452 25 452
OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 150 .......... 150 ..........
WASHITA BASIN PROJECT.......................................... 7 1,048 7 1,048
W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT............................................ 23 435 23 435
OREGON
CROOKED RIVER PROJECT.......................................... 412 427 412 427
DESCHUTES PROJECT.............................................. 300 182 800 182
EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS........................................ 573 272 573 272
KLAMATH PROJECT................................................ 20,589 4,411 20,589 4,411
KLAMATH DAM REMOVAL STUDY...................................... 2,000 .......... 2,000 ..........
OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................. 300 .......... 450 ..........
ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION..................... 814 331 1,014 331
SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL...................................... 1,160 .......... 1,160 ..........
TUALATIN PROJECT............................................... 68 271 68 271
TUALATIN VALLEY WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY....................... ........... .......... 300 ..........
UMATILLA PROJECT............................................... 958 3,352 958 3,352
SOUTH DAKOTA
LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM............................. 2,000 .......... 16,000 ..........
MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT................................. ........... 15 .......... 15
MNI WICONI PROJECT............................................. 17,280 10,200 27,280 10,200
PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM.............................. 1,000 .......... 2,000 ..........
RAPID VALLEY PROJECT........................................... ........... 79 .......... 79
TEXAS
BALMORHEA PROJECT.............................................. 41 17 41 17
CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT......................................... 54 163 54 163
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION P........ 50 .......... 2,550 ..........
NUECES RIVER PROJECT........................................... 20 721 20 721
SAN ANGELO PROJECT............................................. 35 401 35 401
TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................... 45 .......... 45 ..........
UTAH
HYRUM PROJECT.................................................. 152 46 152 46
MOON LAKE PROJECT.............................................. 4 76 4 76
NEWTON PROJECT................................................. 59 39 59 39
NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 200 .......... 700 ..........
OGDEN RIVER PROJECT............................................ 213 177 213 177
PROVO RIVER PROJECT............................................ 1,002 433 1,002 433
SCOFIELD PROJECT............................................... 107 80 107 80
SOUTHERN NEVADA/UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................... 25 .......... 25 ..........
SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 225 .......... 225 ..........
STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT...................................... 248 21 248 21
WEBER BASIN PROJECT............................................ 747 745 1,747 745
WEBER RIVER PROJECT............................................ 50 109 50 109
WASHINGTON
COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT......................................... 5,692 10,762 5,692 10,762
ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY................................... ........... .......... 3,000 ..........
WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS....................................... 193 15 193 15
WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................. 150 .......... 150 ..........
YAKIMA PROJECT................................................. 2,420 6,092 2,420 6,092
YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT................... 8,500 .......... 10,000 ..........
WYOMING
KENDRICK PROJECT............................................... 119 3,139 119 3,139
NORTH PLATTE PROJECT........................................... 266 1,351 266 1,351
SHOSHONE PROJECT............................................... 76 1,080 76 1,080
------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS.................................... 322,861 229,923 455,528 229,923
REGIONAL PROGRAMS
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE I......... ........... 11,450 .......... 11,450
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE I......... 6,970 .......... 6,970 ..........
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, [CRSP], SECTION 5...................... 3,449 4,888 3,449 4,888
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, [CRSP], SECTION 8...................... 2,710 .......... 2,710 ..........
COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM............... 233 .......... 233 ..........
DAM SAFETY PROGRAM:
DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.............................. ........... 2,029 .......... 2,029
INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION............................. ........... 81,600 .......... 81,600
SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS...................... ........... 18,250 .......... 18,250
DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM........................... 488 .......... 488 ..........
EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM................. ........... 1,432 .......... 1,432
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM............. 19,012 .......... 19,012 ..........
ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES............ 2,187 .......... 2,187 ..........
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION........................... 947 .......... 947 ..........
EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES............................. ........... 7,675 .......... 7,675
FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM........................ ........... 1,400 .......... 1,400
GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES....................................... 2,213 .......... 2,213 ..........
LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.............................. 8,682 .......... 8,682 ..........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM........................ 21,448 .......... 22,128 ..........
MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS......................... ........... 777 .......... 777
NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM................................ 6,197 .......... 6,197 ..........
NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING................ 1,563 .......... 1,563 ..........
OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.............................. 1,026 625 1,026 625
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--OTHER PICK SLOAN.................... 3,321 36,205 3,321 36,205
POWER PROGRAM SERVICES......................................... 724 307 724 307
PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM............................... 598 155 598 155
RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION................................. 2,199 .......... 2,199 ..........
RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............ 1,625 .......... 1,625 ..........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:
DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM................ 2,133 1,600 2,133 1,600
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM............................. 9,200 .......... 10,200 ..........
RURAL WATER LEGISLATION, TITLE I............................... 2,348 .......... 2,348 ..........
SITE SECURITY.................................................. ........... 28,877 .......... 28,877
TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.................. ........... .......... 2,500 ..........
UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT.......... 96 .......... 96 ..........
WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM...................... 6,510 .......... 6,510 ..........
WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVE.................................. 37,192 .......... 22,192 ..........
------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES.................... 465,932 427,193 587,779 427,193
UNDERFINANCING................................................. ........... .......... -18,404 -3,193
================================================
TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES....................... 893,125 .......... 993,125 ..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
White Mountain Apache Tribe, Arizona.--The Committee
recommends $3,209,000 to be provided as the subsidy for a loan
to the White Mountain Apache Tribe for a drinking water
project.
Central Valley Project--Friant Division, California.--The
Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for the Semi Tropic
Phase II groundwater banking.
Central Valley Project--San Joaquin Division.--The
Committee recommendation includes $7,000,000 for the San
Joaquin River Restoration. These funds should be utilized in
conjunction with and in advance of those funds available from
the San Joaquin River Restoration Fund.
Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project.--The
Committee recognizes that the authorizing statute (Public Law
104-266 as amended by Public Law 111-11) authorizes a cap of
$20,000,000 in 1996 prices, which could escalate to as much as
$26,000,000 in 2010 prices for the Orange County Regional Water
Reclamation Project. Accordingly, this project has not yet
reached its authorization ceiling and is eligible for
additional funding. Other projects may be similarly situated.
The Committee encourages Reclamation to allocate surplus funds
that may become available from the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act to this project and any other similarly
situated project. The Committee expects the Bureau to provide
accurate capability statements for all Title XVI projects that
reflect the escalator clause. Capability statements should not
contain restrictions and limitations that are based purely on
internal Bureau policies, but rather should reflect the true
maximum capacity of the Bureau under the governing statutes.
Lake Tahoe Regional Wetlands, California and Nevada.--The
Committee recommendation includes $2,602,000. Within the funds
provided, $2,000,000 is recommended for the Rosewood Creek,
Area A project in Nevada.
Sobabo Water Rights Settlement Project, California.--The
Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 above the budget
request for this water rights settlement.
Wichita Project--Equus Beds Division, Kansas.--The
Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 above the budget
request to continue this project.
Fort Peck-Dry Prairie Rural Water System, Montana.--The
Committee recommendation is $14,000,000. $9,000,000 of these
funds should be applied to the tribal portions of the water
system. These funds should be utilized in addition to the
normal tribal/non-tribal split of the underlying funded amount
in the budget ($4,000,000) and provided by the Committee
($1,000,000).
Milk River/St. Mary's Diversion Project.--The Committee
urges the Bureau of Reclamation to combine NEPA compliance
activities and preparation of design, specifications, and
contract documents for the entire St. Mary's project including
the diversion dam, fish passage structure, drop structures,
siphon, and canal as a single activity.
Rocky Boys/North Central Montana Rural Water System,
Montana.--The Committee recommendation is $16,000,000.
$11,000,000 of these funds should be applied to the tribal
portions of the water system. These funds should be utilized in
addition to the normal tribal/non-tribal split of the
underlying funded amount in the budget ($1,000,000) and
provided by the Committee (4,000,000).
Jicarilla Apache Reservation Rural Water System, New
Mexico.--The Committee recommendation includes an additional
$4,000,000 above the budget request to continue work on this
tribal water system.
Navajo-Gallup Water Supply, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommendation includes $7,791,000 for continued work on this
tribal water project.
Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin, Garrison Diversion Unit, North
Dakota.--Within the Committee recommendation, $52,000,000 is
recommended for rural water projects. Of this amount,
$26,000,000 shall be expended for the following projects:
$8,000,000 for the Northwest Area Water Supply; $9,000,000 for
the South Central Regional Water District; and $9,000,000 for
the Southwest Pipeline. Additionally the Committee recommends
$2,000,000 for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Irrigation
Project. The Committee directs Reclamation to rexamine the
Federal cost estimate of the annual operating costs of the
Three Affiliated Tribes water system.
Oregon Investigations Program, Oregon.--$150,000 above the
budget request is recommended for developing appraisal-level
designs and cost estimates for Umatilla on-reservation
distribution systems.
Rogue River Basin Project, Talent Division.--The Committee
recommendation includes $200,000 for the Water for Irrigation
Streams and Economy Feasibility study.
Mni Wiconi Project, South Dakota.--The Committee
recommendation is $33,280,000. $10,000,000 of these funds
should be applied to the tribal portions of the water system.
These funds should be utilized in addition to the normal
tribal/non-tribal split of the underlying funded amount in the
budget ($17,280,000).
Northern Utah Investigations Program, Utah.--The Committee
has recommended an additional $500,000 for the Rural Water
Technology Alliance.
Weber Basin Project, Utah.--The Committee recommends
$1,000,000 for feasibility studies to increase the storage
capacity of the reservoir impounded by the Arthur V. Watkins
Dam.
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Washington.--
The Committee recommends an additional $1,500,000 above the
budget request for the Yakima River Basin Water Storage Plan to
address water shortages in the basin.
Drought Emergency Assistance.--The Committee has provided
the budget request for this program. Within the funds provided,
the Committee urges the Bureau of Reclamation to provide full
and fair consideration for drought assistance from the State of
Hawaii.
Lower Colorado River Operations Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $680,000 above the budget request for
the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Plan for
California.
Research and Development, Science and Technology Program.--
The Committee recommends $1,000,000 above the budget request
for Quagga and Zebra Mussel research activities. The Committee
is concerned about the impacts to western waters of these two
invasive species. Reclamation efforts to date have necessarily
focused on addressing the problems caused by the mussels at
Reclamation facilities. The Committee believes that Reclamation
should establish a research program geared toward eradicating
or controlling these invasive species.
Title XVI, Water Reclamation, and Reuse.--The Committee has
provided $2,500,000 for the WateReuse Foundation. These funds
are available to support the Foundation's research priorities.
Water Conservation Field Services Program.--Within the
amounts provided, Reclamation is urged to continue urban water
conservation projects identified through the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California Innovative Conservation
Program; industrial water efficiency surveys to assess
opportunities to conserve water in industrial water use; and
for weather based irrigation controller activities to pilot
ways to speed distribution and acceptance of these landscape
water efficiency devices.
Water Conservation Initiative.--The Committee encourages
Reclamation to work with Water Research Laboratory at Utah
State University to expand water quality monitoring in the
Cache Valley, Utah, to provide the necessary data to reduce the
uncertainty of water quality management decisions pertaining to
Cutler Reservoir and to reduce the cost of maintaining and
improving water quality in the region.
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $56,079,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 35,358,000
Committee recommendation................................ 35,358,000
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $35,358,000
for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.
The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of
Public Law 102-575. This fund was established to provide
funding from project beneficiaries for habitat restoration,
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of
California. Revenues are derived from payments by project
beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project
beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant
Division surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to
non-CVP users, and tiered water prices) and, to the extent
required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation
and restoration payments.
CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $40,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 31,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 41,000,000
This account funds activities that are consistent with the
CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18
State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's
urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals
of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water
supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-
San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's
water distribution system.
POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $59,400,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 61,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 61,200,000
The Committee recommendation for general administrative
expenses is $61,200,000.
The policy and administrative expenses program provides for
the executive direction and management of all reclamation
activities, as performed by the Commissioner's offices in
Washington, DC, Denver, Colorado, and five regional offices.
The Denver office and regional offices charge individual
projects or activities for direct beneficial services and
related administrative and technical costs. These charges are
covered under other appropriations.
General Provisions--Department of the Interior
Section 201. The bill includes language regarding Bureau of
Reclamation Reprogramming.
Section 202. The bill includes language regarding the San
Luis Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California.
Section 203. The bill includes language that states
requirements for purchase or lease of water from the Middle Rio
Grande or Carlsbad Projects in New Mexico.
Section 204. The bill includes language regarding Drought
Emergency Assistance.
Section 205. The bill includes language extending a project
authorization.
Section 206. The bill includes language regarding the
administration of the Desert Terminal Lakes Program.
Section 207. The bill includes language regarding the
Desert Terminal Lakes Program.
Section 208. The bill includes language expending funds
from the Desert Terminal Lakes Program. The National Fish and
Wildlife Foundation will administer funds for water projects in
the Walker River Basin, including a demonstration water leasing
program to be managed by the Walker River Irrigation District.
Section 209. The Bill includes a provision pertaining to
the North Dakota Natural Resources Trust.
Section 210. The bill contains a provision concerning
CALFED.
TITLE III
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Laboratory Directed Research and Development [LDRD]
The Committee recognizes the invaluable role the Laboratory
Directed Research and Development [LDRD] program provides to
the Federal Government and the Nation in general. Discretionary
LDRD investments have been and will continue to be responsive
to the energy needs of the Nation, as evidenced by recent R&D
projects in materials science, optoelectronics, computer
science, and high-energy density physics. Cutting-edge LDRD
research provides the science base for energy-specific
applications such as fuel cells, hydrogen technologies, carbon
management, nuclear energy, and solid-state lighting. In
addition, LDRD is the national labs' most important tool for
maintaining the vitality of the national labs in support of
other national security missions. LDRD enables the labs to hire
the ``best and brightest'' young scientists and engineers and
allows them to seek innovative science and technology solutions
for current or emerging national security issues, including
those of energy security. LDRD investments have been effective
in providing solutions for today's energy problems and
demonstrate the inherent flexibility of the program to provide
national security mission support on a very timely basis.
Energy climate research needs can best be addressed by
continuing a vibrant LDRD program at the national laboratories.
Pension Shortfalls
The Committee includes section 311 in the General
Provisions to give the Secretary the authority to transfer
funds as necessary to fully fund pension obligations. Over the
last year, the stock market performance has had a devastating
impact on the defined benefit funds of the current and former
laboratory and plant employees. As required by law, these
shortfalls must be closed. All personnel costs, including
pension obligations are charged to the program as an indirect
cost. In fiscal year 2009, the NNSA and Environmental
Management program were forced to redirect nearly $400,000,000
in mission funding to meeting required pension contributions.
At the beginning of the year, the Department estimated that
$1,170,000,000 in pension contributions would be needed;
however, subsequent estimates have projected shortfalls to
increase by an additional $260,000,000, a 22 percent increase,
which can only be recovered through program funding. In the
fiscal year 2010 budget request, the administration has
attempted to provide additional funding to the various programs
impacted, but significant funding gaps remain. In order to
minimize the impact to program funding, especially those
programs that are facing flat or declining budget requests, the
Committee felt it was prudent to provide the Department with
additional authority to minimize the impact to programs and
personnel.
Reprogramming Guidelines
The Department of Energy is directed to operate in a manner
fully consistent with the following reprogramming guidelines. A
reprogramming request must be submitted to the Committees on
Appropriations for consideration before any implementation of a
reorganization proposal which includes moving previous
appropriations between appropriation accounts. The Department
is directed to inform the Committees promptly and fully when a
change in program execution and funding is required during the
fiscal year. To assist the Department in this effort, the
following guidance is provided for programs and activities
funded in the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act. The Department is directed to follow this
guidance for all programs and activities unless specific
reprogramming guidance is provided for a program or activity.
Definition.--A reprogramming includes the reallocation of
funds from one activity to another within an appropriation, or
any significant departure from a program, project, activity, or
organization described in the agency's budget justification as
presented to and approved by Congress. For construction
projects, a reprogramming constitutes the reallocation of funds
from one construction project identified in the justifications
to another project or a significant change in the scope of an
approved project.
Any reallocation of new or prior year budget authority or
prior year deobligations must be submitted to the Committees in
writing and may not be implemented prior to approval by the
Committees on Appropriations.
Energy Programs
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Appropriations, 2009..................................\1\$18,978,540,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 2,318,602,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,233,967,000
\1\Includes Emergency Appropriations of $250,000,000 under Public Law
110-329 and $16,800,000,000 under Public Law 111-5.
The Committee recommendation is $2,233,967,000 for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
In updating the renewable energy resource assessments
required by section 201 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the
Committee recommends that each program area assess the amount
of each type of renewable energy that can reasonably be
expected to be deployed by the year 2030. The reports should be
modeled on the Department's 20 percent Wind Energy by 2030
report issued in May 2008. The individual resource reports
should be integrated into a single report that investigates
multiple alternative scenarios for the potential deployment of
renewable resources by 2030.
Hydrogen Technology.--The Committee recommends
$190,000,000, all above the request of $0, to continue funding
189 contracts the Department has in place for fiscal year 2010,
saving approximately 140 jobs at universities, 150 at Federal
laboratories, and 235 jobs within industry. The Committee
provides additional funds to enable fuel research and
development, early market deployment, transformation, and
enabling activities in transportation applications. The
Committee also looks forward to the 2009 release of the updated
Hydrogen Program Plan that replaces the existing Posture Plan,
and encourages the Secretary to consider it more carefully as
the fiscal year 2011 program budget is developed.
Fuel Cell Technologies.--The Committee recommends $0,
rather than $68,213,000, as requested, for Fuel Cell
Technologies. Fuel cell technology can continue to be pursued
under the Hydrogen Technology program in fiscal year 2010 as it
has been in the past.
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D.--The Committee
recommends $235,000,000, the same as the request. Within the
available funds, the Committee directs the Department to
provide not less than $35,000,000 for a comprehensive research,
development and deployment strategy focused on algae biofuels.
This non-food source biofuel offers one of the best
opportunities to develop large-scale production on non-arable
land using non-potable water. The Committee encourages the
Department to develop a balanced program to address technical
challenges related to organism selection, cultivation, water
usage, biofuel production, and land-use issues. The Department
should particularly pursue algal biofuels that have a high
potential to beneficially re-use industrial carbon dioxide and
are fungible in existing infrastructure. The Committee expects
the Department to enlist the participation and to provide
funding to universities, laboratories and industry to support
this effort.
Also, within available funds, $7,500,000 is provided for
coordination with the Fuels Technology subprogram under
Vehicles Technologies to expand and accelerate testing of
intermediate fuel blends (15 percent-20 percent ethanol mixed
with 80 percent-85 percent gasoline). The testing is performed
on vehicles, other engines, and infrastructure components to
provide data on how these blends may affect materials,
durability, performance and emissions, and alleviate supply/
demand imbalances. Work should be done in coordination with the
Vehicles Technology Program.
Solar Energy.--The Committee recommends $255,000,000. From
within the amount provided, the Committee directs the
Department to provide $30,000,000 to support the demonstration
and deployment of concentrating solar technology. No funds are
provided for the Solar Electricity Energy Innovation Hub.
The Committee notes that flexible solar cell roofing
shingles and panels have the potential to provide significant
distributed, renewable electricity generation. The Committee
encourages the Department to support research, development, and
demonstration of novel technologies, including innovative
textiles, which have the potential to enhance power generation
and reduce production and installation costs of solar cells and
panels.
The budget request provides $30,000,000 to establish a PV
Manufacturing Initiative. The National Academies Board on
Science, Technology, and Economic Policy is exploring the
future of PV manufacturing in the United States, specifically
the economic and institutional issues for technology-related
public-private partnerships, conducting workshops in April,
July, and October 2009. The Committee directs the Department to
develop the PV Manufacturing Initiative consistent with the
recommendations of these workshops. The Committee recognizes
the value of creating a centralized facility to assist solar PV
companies in making the transition to commercial production,
and encourages the Department to create such a facility,
consistent with the recommendations of these workshops, either
at an existing facility to avoid additional mortgage costs, or
at a separate facility.
Wind Energy.--The recommendation is $85,000,000. The
committee directs this office and the Office of Electricity to
work collaboratively to improve wind systems integration and
forecasting modeling to facilitate increased deployment of wind
energy nationwide.
Geothermal Technology.--The recommendation for Geothermal
Technology is $50,000,000, the same as the administration's
request. The Committee directs the Department to provide not
less than $5,000,000 to develop and deploy low temperature
geothermal systems.
Water Power Energy R&D.--The Committee recommends
$60,000,000, a total of $30,000,000 above the request. The
Committee directs that all of the available increase be applied
to expand marine and hydrokinetic research, development, and
deployment. The Committee directs the Department to use the
available funding to validate economic and technical viability
of a variety of technologies and to provide a written report to
Congress on the prospect of each of the technologies. In
addition, the Department shall include its research and
development priorities and goals for this program for the next
5 years. The Department is directed to utilize the Department's
only marine sciences laboratory to undertake an R&D program to
expand marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy programs
consistent with section 633 of EISA 2007.
Vehicle Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$323,302,000. The Committee encourages the Department to
continue investigating the full portfolio of transportation
fuel options within the Fuels Technology Program, including
biofuels, electricity, natural gas, hydrogen, and other
advanced fuels.
Within available funds, $2,200,000 is provided to the
vehicles program for the Department to contract with the
National Academy of Sciences to conduct a comprehensive
analysis of energy use within the light-duty vehicle
transportation sector, and use the analysis to conduct an
integrated study of the technology and fuel options that could
reduce petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
Also within available funds, $7,500,000 is provided for
coordination with the Biomass program to expand and accelerate
testing of intermediate fuel blends (15 percent-20 percent
ethanol mixed with 80 percent-85 percent gasoline). The testing
is performed on vehicles, other engines, and infrastructure
components to provide data on how these blends may affect
materials, durability, performance and emissions, and alleviate
supply/demand imbalances.
The Committee further directs the Department to study the
variety and density of recharging infrastructure options
necessary to support significant penetration of plug-in,
electric drive, light-duty vehicles. The Department must report
back to Congress on the progress of the secondary applications
and disposal of electric drive vehicle batteries program
required under Section K of 42 U.S.C. 17231.
Building Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$202,698,000, a decrease of $35,000,000 to the request. No
funds are provided for the Equipment Standards and Analysis
Hub. The Committee has continued to invest additional resources
in building technologies and other renewable technologies, but
the Department has maintained the same goal of developing a
zero-energy home in 2020. The Committee challenges the
Department to better integrate renewable energy technology and
focus the buildings research to achieve a zero-energy home
sooner than the 2020 target date.
Industrial Technologies.--The Committee provides
$100,000,000, the same as the request.
Federal Energy Management Program.--The Committee
recommends $32,272,000, the same as the request. The Committee
is concerned with the lack of progress being made at the
Department in adapting Congressional direction to reduce its
electricity usage and support deployment of increased
efficiency technologies. The May 2009 Inspector General report
finds the Department has not taken many possible and practical
actions to reduce energy consumption associated with its
information technology resources. The Committee has
significantly increased funding to the Department for energy
efficiency initiatives. Yet, it does not appear that the
Department has implemented policies and procedures to save
millions of dollars annually, i.e., through implementing more
energy-efficient computer power management, thin-client
computing, and data centers which should apply more cost-
effective, power efficient storage systems. The Committee
believes the Department should aggressively implement the IG's
``low-hanging fruit'' recommendations as well as work with the
Office of Science and the NNSA Advanced Computing program to
apply innovative technology solutions. The Committee notes
these steps should be viewed as the bare minimum necessary to
meet congressional and presidential directives to the
Department.
RE-ENERGYSE.--The Committee recommends $0, a decrease of
$115,000,000 from the request.
Facilities and Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
$63,000,000, the same as the request. Of the total, $44,000,000
is provided for the South Table Mountain Ingress/Egress and
Traffic Capacity Upgrades project at the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. Through the ARRA, Congress
provided the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
with $16,800,000,000. The Committee would support the
Department using ARRA funding for the South Mountain Table
Ingress/Egress and Traffic Capacity Upgrades project, freeing
up $44,000,000 for energy research in fiscal year 2010. If the
Department is able to change the funding source for this
project, the Committee supports the Department using the
$44,000,000 to fund the proposed Fuels From Sunlight and Energy
Efficient Building Systems hubs at $22,000,000 each.
Weatherization Assistance Program.--The Committee
recommends $200,000,000. Of that amount, $3,300,000 is for
training and technical assistance. The Committee understands
the Department is looking at non-traditional initiatives to
increase the effectiveness of the weatherization program. From
within available funds, the Committee directs the Department to
develop two pilot projects, at $35,000,000 each. The first is
for the purpose of demonstrating energy savings through use of
improved insulating and sealing in homes built prior to 1980.
The Committee also directs the Department to develop a pilot
project that would increase the leverage of Federal funding
through the formation of partnerships between the Department
and traditional and/or non-traditional weatherization
providers. The current Weatherization Assistance Program
leverages less than $1 from non-Federal sources for every
Federal dollar invested. The Committee hopes the Department
could attain a $3 to $1 match.
Intergovernmental Activities.--The Committee recommends
$50,000,000 for State Energy Programs, $10,000,000 for Tribal
Energy Activities, and $5,000,000 for the Renewable Energy
Production Incentive.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $152,620,000.
Program Support.--The Committee recommends $72,000,000. The
Committee is supportive of two new efforts called Strategic
Priorities and Impact Analysis and Commercialization, and
provides $15,000,000 and $25,000,000 respectively. The
Committee understands the International Renewable Energy
Program is being transferred to this account in fiscal year
2010, where it is being increased to $10,000,000 from the
$5,000,000 appropriated in fiscal year 2009. Within the funds
provided, the Department is directed to begin conducting
feasibility studies of the most promising strategies and
projects identified in the recently updated Territorial Energy
Assessment. Authorized by section 252 of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005, the Assessment is looking at strategies and projects
that have the greatest potential for reducing the dependence of
U.S. territories and freely associated states on imported oil.
Further, of the International Renewable Energy Program funding,
$2,000,000 is available to support the U.S.-Israeli energy
cooperation agreement.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $148,075,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of energy
efficiency or renewable energy technologies or programs. The
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost-sharing
requirements may apply to these projects.
The Committee directs $2,000,000 of the total provided to
the Hawaii Sustainable Energy Security project be used to
evaluate the efficacy of integrating the full range of
renewable energy technologies into electricity grids including,
but not limited, to hydro electricity, solar, and
photovoltaics. Additionally, of the total provided to the
Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture project, $2,000,000
is to support pilot/commercial scale demonstrations using
renewable, nonfossil energy resources that provide
documentation of the efficacy of renewable energy technologies
and measures of the carbon footprint and other environmental
impacts associated with such projects, which could include but
are not limited to cold seawater air conditioning,
photovoltaics, and solar. Finally, of the total provided for
the Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass
Conversion project, $2,000,000 is for support of on-farm
demonstration of feedstock production and conversion
technologies and the Committee recommends expansion of these
activities to the American Pacific region through a partnership
with the Western Insular Pacific Subcenter.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21st Century Renewable Fuels, $1,250,000 Senators Levin,
Energy, and Materials Initiative. Stabenow
A123Systems Large Format 1,000,000 Senators Levin,
Nanophosphate Batteries for Solar Stabenow
Energy Storage.
Algae Biofuels Research............ 2,000,000 Senators Murray,
Cantwell
Algae to Ethanol Research and 750,000 Senators Lautenberg,
Evaluation. Menendez
Algal-Based Renewable Energy for 800,000 Senator Reid
Nevada.
Alternative and Unconventional 10,000,000 Senator Bennett
Energy Research and Development.
Alternative Energy School of the 1,200,000 Senator Reid
Future.
Bayview Gas to Energy Project...... 1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Ben Franklin Technology Partners-- 500,000 Senator Casey
Clean Technology Commercialization
Initiative.
Biodiesel Blending................. 600,000 Senator Kohl
Biodiesel Feedstock Development 1,000,000 Senator Bond
Initiative (MO).
Biomass Energy Resources Center.... 1,000,000 Senator Leahy
Black Hills State Heating and 1,000,000 Senators Johnson,
Cooling Plant. Thune
Cellulosic Diesel Biorefinery...... 1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg,
Menendez
Center for Biomass Utilization..... 7,000,000 Senators Dorgan,
Conrad
Center for Nanoscale Energy........ 5,000,000 Senator Dorgan
Center for Ocean Renewable Energy.. 750,000 Senator Shaheen
Central Vermont Recovered Biomass 500,000 Senator Leahy
Facility.
Clean Power and Energy Research 1,000,000 Senator Landrieu
Consortium.
Commercial Building Energy 500,000 Senator Durbin
Efficiency Demonstration.
Cooling Heating and Power (Micro- 2,000,000 Senator Cochran
CHP) and Bio-Fuel Application
Center.
Development of an Economic and 750,000 Senator Hagan
Efficient Biodiesel Production
Process.
Development of Biofuels Using Ionic 1,500,000 Senator Reid
Transfer Membranes.
Development of High Yield Tropical 6,000,000 Senator Inouye
Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion.
DRI Renewable Energy Center [REC].. 500,000 Senator Reid
Energy Storage/Conservation and 400,000 Senators Kennedy,
Carbon Emissions Reduction Kerry
Demonstration Project.
EngenuitySC Commercialization and 500,000 Senator Graham
Entrepreneurial Training Project.
Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe 200,000 Senator Reid
Demonstration Energy Park.
Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel 300,000 Senators Kennedy,
Blanket Process Project. Kerry
Fuel Cell Durability Research...... 1,000,000 Senator Dodd
Gas heat pump cooperative training 250,000 Senator Reid
program.
Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass. 1,500,000 Senator Reed
Great Basin College--Direct-Use 1,000,000 Senator Reid
Geothermal Demonstration Project.
Great Lakes Institute for Energy 1,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Innovation.
Great Plains Wind Power Test 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison
Facility, Texas Tech University,
Lubbock, TX.
Hawaii Energy Sustainability 6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
Program.
Hawaii Renewable Energy Development 6,000,000 Senator Inouye
Venture.
High Speed Wind Turbine Noise Model 1,000,000 Senator Cochran
with Suppression.
Hydrogen Production and Delivery 500,000 Senators Dodd,
Technology. Lieberman
HyperCAST R&D Funding for Vehicle 750,000 Senator Bennet
Energy Efficiency.
Independent Energy Community 1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Renewable Power System.
Institute for Sustainable Energy... 750,000 Senator Sessions
Iowa Central Community College 750,000 Senator Harkin
Renewable Fuel Testing Laboratory.
Lane Community College Energy 550,000 Senators Wyden,
Demonstration Building. Merkley
Lansing Plug-In Hybrid Initiative.. 750,000 Senators Levin,
Stabenow
Low Cost Production of Thin-film 1,200,000 Senator Specter
Photovoltaic [PV] Cells.
Marine Energy Technology........... 1,750,000 Senator Murray
MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy 1,000,000 Senators Lincoln,
Consortium. Pryor
Montana Algal BioDiesel Initiative. 500,000 Senators Baucus,
Tester
Montana Bio-Energy Center of 2,250,000 Senators Baucus,
Excellence. Tester
Nanostructured Materials for 1,000,000 Senator Cochran
Improved Photovoltaics.
Nanostructured Solar Cells for 500,000 Senators Lincoln,
Increased Efficiency and Lower Pryor
Cost.
National Center of Excellence in 1,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Energy Storage Technology.
National Open-Ocean Energy 2,000,000 Senators Bill Nelson,
Laboratory. Martinez
National Wind Energy Center, 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison
University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Near Zero Carbon Footprint Energy 1,000,000 Senator Specter
Creation Through Thermal Oxidation.
Nevada Renewable Energy Integration 3,000,000 Senator Reid
and Development Consortium.
NIREC--Nevada Institute for 1,000,000 Senator Reid
Renewable Energy Commercialization.
Northern Nevada Renewable Energy 500,000 Senator Reid
Training Project.
Norwich Cogeneration Initiative.... 750,000 Senators Dodd,
Lieberman
Novel Photocatalytic Metal Oxides.. 250,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Offshore Wind Initiative........... 5,000,000 Senators Collins,
Snowe
Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing 500,000 Senator Brown
Center.
Oregon Solar Highway--Innovative 1,000,000 Senators Wyden,
Use of Solar Technology. Merkley
Placer County Biomass Utilization 1,000,000 Senator Feinstein
Pilot Project.
Power Cube for Wind Power and Grid 500,000 Senator Specter
Regulation Services.
Renewable Energy Clean Air Project 1,000,000 Senator Klobuchar
[RECAP].
Renewable Energy Demonstration..... 500,000 Senator Durbin
Renewable Energy Feasibility Study 500,000 Senator Reid
and Resources Assessment.
Renewable Energy Initiative........ 500,000 Senator Durbin
Renewable Energy Initiatives for 1,000,000 Senator Reid
Clark County, Nevada Parks and
Recreation.
Research on Fuel Cell Powered by 675,000 Senator Schumer
Hydrogen Produced from Biomass to
Provide Clean Energy for Remote
Farms away from Electric Grids.
San Francisco Electric Vehicle 500,000 Senator Boxer
Infrastructure Initiative.
Shenandoah Valley as a National 750,000 Senators Webb, Warner
Demonstration Project Achieving 25
Percent Renewable Energy by the
Year 2025.
Smart Energy Program............... 500,000 Senators Dodd,
Lieberman
Solar Compactor Energy Efficiency 300,000 Senators Kennedy,
Research Demonstration Project. Kerry
Solar Electric Power for 500,000 Senator Reid
Nonsectarian Educational and
Social Services Facility.
Solar Energy Development, 800,000 Senator Collins
University of Maine at Presque
Isle, ME.
Solar Energy Zone Planning and 1,000,000 Senator Reid
Infrastructure for the Nevada Test
Site and Adjacent Lands.
Solar Panels in Municipal Owned 1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg,
Buildings. Menendez
Solar Pioneer and Solar 500,000 Senator Gillibrand
Entrepreneur Programs.
Southern Pine Based Biorefinery 1,000,000 Senator Chambliss
Center.
Southern Regional Center for 4,000,000 Senator Cochran
Lightweight Innovative Designs.
Southwest Alaska Regional 2,500,000 Senators Murkowski,
Geothermal Energy Project. Begich
Strategic Biomass Initiative....... 500,000 Senator Cochran
Student Sustainability Initiatives. 300,000 Senator Sanders
Sun Grant Initiative............... 2,750,000 Senator Johnson
Sustainable Energy Research Center. 10,000,000 Senator Cochran
Switchgrass Biofuel Research: 500,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Carbon Sequestration and Life
Cycle Analysis.
The CUNY Energy Institute.......... 1,550,000 Senators Schumer,
Gillibrand
Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & 500,000 Senator Leahy
Development.
Unconventional and Renewable 2,500,000 Senator Bennett
Energies Research Utilizing
Computer Simulations.
University of Louisville Research 2,000,000 Senator McConnell
and Energy Independence Program.
University of New Haven Solar 500,000 Senator Dodd
Testing and Training Lab.
UNR--Biodiesel from Food Waste..... 1,000,000 Senator Reid
UNR--Great Basin Center for 1,000,000 Senator Reid
Geothermal Energy.
UNR--Mass Exchanger Technology for 1,200,000 Senator Reid
Geothermal and Solar Energy
Systems.
Vermont Biofuels Initiative........ 750,000 Senator Leahy
Vermont Energy Investment 450,000 Senator Sanders
Corporation.
Wallowa County Integrated Biomass 500,000 Senators Wyden,
Energy Center. Merkley
Washoe Wind Turbine Demonstration 50,000 Senator Reid
Project.
Wind Turbine Development........... 1,000,000 Senators Baucus,
Tester
Wind Turbine Infrastructure for 1,000,000 Senators Carper,
Green Energy and Research on Wind Kaufman
Power in Delaware.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
Appropriations, 2009...................................\1\$4,637,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 208,008,000
Committee recommendation................................ 179,483,000
\1\Includes Emergency Appropriations of $4,500,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee provides $179,483,000 for Electricity
Delivery and Energy Reliability. No funding is provided for the
Grid Materials, Devices and Systems Hub.
The Committee is supportive of the increased investment in
cyber security funding to support a coordinated research and
development strategy that will improve the security of our
national electricity grid and establish the appropriate
protocols and policies for the integration on smart grid
technology and to validate and test SCADA technologies and
software. To ensure the effective deployment of this technology
in the electric transmission system the Committee directs the
Department to establish a private sector organization to
identify vulnerabilities, and develop research and development
and deployment strategies. It is important the users, owners
and operators of the bulk power system are able to work with
Federal agencies and laboratories to test and validate
technologies and software and develop and disseminate best
practices to ensure the thorough deployment of the state-of-
the-art technology. In addition, this organization must include
broad representation of owners, operators, users, and
technology providers. Due to the international threat the
Department should include other countries that face similar
cyber security threats to share best practices to the extent
possible. The Committee recommends that the Department provide
up to 50 percent of the funding for cyber security to establish
the organization and execute the recommended research,
development and deployment strategy.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $6,475,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of
electricity delivery and energy reliability technologies or
programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost-
sharing requirements may apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Development and Reliability. $325,000 Senator Dorgan
Navajo Nation Electrification 1,750,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom
Program. Udall
North Dakota Energy Workforce 1,900,000 Senator Dorgan
Development.
Oswego County BOCES Wind Turbine 200,000 Senator Schumer
Model Project.
Power Grid Reliability and Security 1,000,000 Senators Murray,
Cantwell
Technology Development............. 300,000 Senator Dorgan
UVM Smart Energy Grid Research..... 500,000 Senator Leahy
Watkins Glen, Schuyler County Gas 500,000 Senator Gillibrand
Storage project.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Energy
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $792,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 761,274,000
Committee recommendation................................ 761,274,000
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommendation for nuclear energy research
and development totals $761,274,000.
Integrated University Program.--The Committee provides
$5,000,000 to restore funding to current year levels and
sustain the ongoing collaboration between the Office of Nuclear
Energy, NNSA's Office of Nuclear Nonproliferation and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support the education and
training of engineers and scientists in nuclear engineering, as
well as nonproliferation, nuclear forensics, and nuclear
safeguards missions. This funding is to be used consistent with
the authorization provided in section 313 of Public Law 111-8.
This funding is not intended to supplant university research
funding provided within the nuclear energy research and
development activities. Studies by the American Physical
Society, American Association for the Advancement of Science,
and the American Nuclear Society recommended Federal investment
in university research and training in nuclear engineering and
forensics as well.
Nuclear Power 2010.--The Committee recommends $120,000,000,
an increase of $100,000,000. This funding is to be used to
support the engineering design work of U.S. reactor designs in
the development of a license application to the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. Not only will this reactor design
facilitate deployment in the United States, but will also
support export sales, where there is strong interest in nuclear
power.
Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems.--The Committee
recommendation is $143,000,000. The Committee has shifted
$10,000,000 to the Research Reactor Infrastructure program to
support university-led research and fund critically important
equipment upgrades.
Within the available funds, $10,000,000 is provided to
focus on existing light water reactor technology life
extension. Consistent with the MIT Study ``Update of the MIT
2003 Future of Nuclear Power'' the Committee directs the
Department to evaluate the issues related to extending the life
of the existing light water reactors to 80 years and support
research to increase the power output of future light water
reactors.
The Committee is concerned the budget request for this
program lacks focus and mission. This is demonstrated by the
fact that this budget reverses the previous decision by the
program to focus on two advanced reactor technologies in favor
of supporting research on six different technologies. This is a
step backwards and unproductive in advancing deployment of new
reactor designs. The Committee directs the program to select
two reactor technologies in fiscal year 2010 and focus its
research on those designs that offer the best opportunity to
realize commercial deployment, a high level of safety and
efficiency and exhibit the best waste management
characteristics.
The Committee does believe advanced computing and
simulation can play a critical role in developing advanced
fuels and modeling reactor performance. As such, the Committee
supports the establishment of the Energy Innovation Hub for
Modeling and Simulation. Advanced computing can only be
effective if its software codes are supported by validated
experiments which are supported by the Fuel Cycle Research and
Development program. The Committee also recommends this office
support an industry cost shared demonstration program to
develop and test high performance light water reactor fuel
utilizing ceramic cladding.
The Committee appreciates the fact that ongoing nuclear
research is being performed in aging nuclear facilities at our
national laboratories and campuses. The Committee believes
investment in these facilities is critical if the Department is
going to support a robust research program to develop advanced
fuels and reactor technologies. The Committee recommends
$20,000,000 from within the available funding to be divided
evenly between Oak Ridge and Los Alamos National Labs for hot
cell and nuclear testing infrastructure. The Committee has also
made additional investment in university research reactors and
the Idaho National Laboratory infrastructure as well.
Fuel Cycle Research and Development.--The Committee
recommends $145,000,000 for this program, the same as current
year levels. The Committee cannot support the proposed
innovation hub in extreme materials in light of the termination
of the LANSCE Facility upgrade at Los Alamos, which offers the
best existing opportunity to serve the extreme materials
research mission. Like the Generation IV program, this program
request lacks specificity, yet the mission is critical to
addressing our current and future spent fuel needs, especially
in light of the administration's decision to abandon Yucca
Mountain. Consistent with the recommendations proposed in the
MIT Update Study, the Committee directs the Department to
support the following R&D strategy: (1) Continue to support
fuel separations technologies to validate and demonstrate the
capability of technologies and processes that will produce
separate fuel, actinides and fission byproducts and produce new
fuel pellets for testing; (2) expand the capability to utilize
computer simulation and modeling to support this mission; (3)
consider alternatives to the existing waste management strategy
to support a wider variety of waste solutions including long
term geologic repositories and interim strategies (funding may
be provided to support site specific research and
characterization, in order to develop fuels that improve long-
term waste handling and storage requirements); and (4) develop
a strategy in cooperation with industry to support material
protection control and accounting of nuclear material.
RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Space and Defense Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
the budget request for this activity at $47,000,000.
Research Reactor Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
$15,000,000 for this activity to support facility upgrades at
reactor facilities and equipment purchases for universities
that support nuclear engineering programs consistent with
historic funding levels. The budget request had buried this
activity within the Idaho facilities management program.
Pu-238 Production Restart Project.--The Committee
recommends no funding for this program at this time. The
Committee understands the importance of this mission and the
capability provided to other Federal agencies. However, the
Department's proposed plutonium reprocessing program is poorly
defined and lacks an overall mission justification as well as a
credible project cost estimate. Sustaining the plutonium
mission is a costly but an important responsibility. The
Committee expects the Department to work with other Federal
agency customers to develop an equitable and appropriate cost-
sharing strategy to sustain this mission into the future.
IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
The Committee recommends $211,274,000. The Committee
opposes the Department's decision to included research reactor
funding within the Idaho Facilities Management line. The
additional funding provided in this account and the funds
provided for research reactors shall be applied to support
upgrades to the Advanced Test Reactor Life Extension program
for a total increase of 12,700,000 for the ATR. This is a one-
of-a-kind user facility supporting research and mission need
for Federal customers, academia, and commercial users that must
be maintained. The Committee recognizes that this account has
received $45,000,000 in additional funding to offset shortfalls
in pension funding caused by poor market performance. Without
these funds, mission priorities and goals would be compromised.
PROGRAM DIRECTION
The Committee recommends $73,000,000 to Program Direction,
consistent with the budget request.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $2,000,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of nuclear
energy technologies or programs. The Committee reminds
recipients that statutory cost-sharing requirements may apply
to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Fabrication Consortium..... $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Appropriations, 2009...................................\1\$4,276,320,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 617,565,000
Committee recommendation................................ 699,200,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $3,400,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee recommendation for Fossil Energy Research and
Development is $699,200,000. No funds are provided for the
Clean Coal Power Initiative and FutureGen because of
substantial increases in the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act. The Committee urges the Department to work thoroughly but
expeditiously to utilize these funds as well as to expand its
efforts on innovative concepts for beneficial reuse of carbon
dioxide activities. The Committee has also added bill language
to permit the Department to vest title to property acquired for
all programs under Fossil energy appropriations in the same
manner as authorized for the Clean Coal Power Initiative.
Fuels and Power Systems.--The Committee recommends
$428,200,000 for fuels and power systems which is $24,300,000
above the request. The recommendation includes $58,000,000 for
Innovations for Existing Plants [IEP]. The IEP program is
directed to continue carbon capture research for the existing
fleet. Of the IEP funds, $10,000,000 is for Federal
laboratories, in collaboration with universities, to continue
research and development on the critical link between water and
fossil energy extraction including unconventional fossil energy
resources and utilization. The Committee also supports
$5,000,000, in additional research for the mercury research
program. The Committee provides $2,000,000 for the Department
to work with utilities, cooperatives, and municipalities to
perform an assessment of coal-fired power plants in the
existing U.S. fleet that would be suitable candidates for
consideration of CO2 capture retrofits. The
Committee expects the Department to assess the retrofit
capacity based on a wide range of variables, including
available space, water supplies, sequestration potential,
labor, and other options. The Committee expects the Department
to provide the estimated cost and schedule for the various
control technology options that are known at this time. The
Committee recommends $65,000,000 for the Advanced Integrated
Gasification Combined Cycle activities and $32,000,000 for the
Advanced Turbines program. The Committee recommends
$160,200,000 for Carbon Sequestration activities but does not
support the request for the hub. The Committee has provided
$5,000,000 to be applied to advanced computational modeling and
visualization to be applied to the large regional sequestration
demonstration projects research. The Committee has further
provided $5,000,000 for the Department to explore co-
sequestration technology opportunities. The Committee
recommends $25,000,000 for Fuels to support both fuels research
from coal liquids and hydrogen. Within available funds for
Fuels, the Committee recommends adequate funding to continue
the integrated coal-biomass research activities. The Committee
recommends $58,000,000 for Fuel Cell research. The Committee
recommends $30,000,000 for Advanced Research, including
$3,000,000 for computational energy sciences.
Natural Gas Technologies.--The Committee recommendation
includes $25,000,000. Of this amount $15,000,000 is provided to
methane hydrates, and $5,000,000 is for research to continue to
develop solutions to minimize the impact or develop treatment
technologies for produced water as a by-product of natural gas
production. Within the remaining funding, the Committee
recommends supporting unconventional natural gas production
from basins that contain tight gas sands, shale gas and coal
bed methane resources.
Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies.--The Committee
recommends $25,000,000 to establish an unconventional fossil
energy technologies program to replace the Oil Technologies
program that was not funded in this budget request. The
Committee recognizes the vast potential to increase the
domestic production of on-shore unconventional oil, natural gas
and coal resources but acknowledges the technological, economic
and environmental challenges related to their production. The
Committee recommends $20,000,000 to establish a comprehensive
research, development and technology deployment strategy to
focus a range of unconventional oil, gas and coal resources. In
demonstrating technology applications, the program should look
to deploy new or validate existing technology applications and
should consider demonstrations located on state or Federal
lands. The Committee encourages the Department to include
funding for interdisciplinary university, laboratory and
industry consortia to develop and test technology and
productions methods. Within available funds, the Committee
recommends $1,200,000 to continue the Risk Based Management
System and the continuation of the stripper well program.
The Committee recognizes the tremendous potential that
computational visualization can offer in the development and
efficient production of unconventional fossil resources in an
environmentally responsible manner. The Committee directs the
Office of Fossil Energy, the Office of Science and NNSA's
Advanced Computing and Simulation [ASC] program to work in
collaboration with universities and industry to establish a
joint program to develop a research, development and
demonstration strategy and make awards to enhance domestic
production and minimize the environmental impacts utilizing
advanced simulation and visualization capabilities. The
Committee recommends $5,000,000 be provided to the Office of
Fossil Energy and has also provided funds to Office of Science
and the NNSA's ASC campaign for this joint effort.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $158,000,000
for Program Direction, of which $125,150,000 is for the
National Energy Technology Laboratory.
Other Programs.--The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for
Plant and Capital Equipment. The Committee recommends
$10,000,000 for Fossil Energy Environmental Restoration. The
Committee recommends $700,000 for the Special recruitment
programs. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for Cooperative
research and development. The Committee continues to support
the Department's project management efforts and the role of the
National Energy Technology Laboratory [NETL], with the
assistance of the Golden Field Office, in setting up a
successful Project Management Center [PMC]. The Committee
encourages the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
to continue collaboration and funding of the PMC with the NETL.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee
recommends $27,300,000 for the following congressionally
directed projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED FOSSIL ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design and Test of an Advanced SOFC $1,000,000 Senator Specter
Generator in PA.
Fossil Fuel Research and 4,000,000 Senators Dorgan,
Development. Conrad
Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research 1,200,000 Senator Cochran
Consortium.
Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing Station... 1,200,000 Senator Byrd
Long Term Environmental and 1,250,000 Senator Byrd
Economic Impacts of the
Development of a Coal Liquefaction
Sector in China.
Montana ICTL Demonstration......... 1,250,000 Senator Baucus
National Center for Hydrogen 3,000,000 Senators Dorgan,
Technology. Conrad
Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic 1,500,000 Senator Bennett
Membranes.
Shallow Carbon Sequestration Pilot 2,400,000 Senator Bond
Demonstration (MO).
Utah Center for Ultra-Clean Coal 8,000,000 Senator Bennett
Utilization and Heavy Oil Research.
Utah Coal and Biomass to Fuel Pilot 2,500,000 Senator Bennett
Plant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $19,099,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 23,627,000
Committee recommendation................................ 23,627,000
The Committee recommends $23,627,000 for fiscal year 2010,
the same as the budget request for the operation of the naval
petroleum and oil shale reserves. The Department is directed to
operate the field as close to maximum efficiency as possible,
given available funds.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $205,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 229,073,000
Committee recommendation................................ 259,073,000
The Committee recommends $259,073,000 for the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve. Of these funds, the Committee directs the
Department to use $30,000,000 for engineering activities at the
Richton, Mississippi expansion site. While the Committee has
provided for the operation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve,
it does not support any other expansion activities at this
time. The Committee also provides for the purchase of a
commercial storage cavern to replace an existing Strategic
Petroleum Reserve cavern due to environmental risk at the Bayou
Choctaw, Louisiana site.
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $9,800,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 11,300,000
Committee recommendation................................ 11,300,000
The Committee recommends $11,300,000, the same as the
budget request.
Energy Information Administration
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $110,595,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 133,058,000
Committee recommendation................................ 110,595,000
The Committee recommends $110,595,000 for the Energy
Information Administration.
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$744,819,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 237,517,000
Committee recommendation................................ 259,829,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $483,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee's recommendation for Non-Defense
Environmental Cleanup is $259,829,000, a total of $22,312,000
above the request.
Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2010, the
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between
operating expense funded projects within the controls listed
below using guidance contained in the Department's budget
execution manual [DOE M 135.1-1A, Chapter IV]. All capital
construction line item projects remain separate controls from
the operating projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the
House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all
reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the
Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of
Congressional response. The Committee recommends the following
reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2010:
--Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and
Decommissioning;
--Gaseous Diffusion Plants;
--Small Sites; and
--West Valley Demonstration Project.
Internal Reprogramming Authority.--Headquarters
Environmental Management may transfer up to $2,000,000, one
time, between accounts listed above to reduce health and safety
risks, gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a
program or project is not increased or decreased by more than
$2,000,000 in total during the fiscal year.
The reprogramming authority--either formal or internal--may
not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on
Appropriations in the House and Senate must be notified within
30 days after the use of the internal reprogramming authority.
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and
Decommissioning.--The Committee recommends $7,652,000, the same
as the request.
Gaseous Diffusion Plants.--The Committee recommends
$104,444,000, the same as the request.
Small Sites.--The Committee recommends $82,233,000, an
increase of $14,886,000 above the request. An additional
$10,000,000 is provided to Moab, bringing the fiscal year 2010
total to $40,671,000, and an additional $4,886,000 is provided
to continue ongoing surveillance and operation of groundwater
treatment systems and completion of the decontamination and
decommissioning of two reactor facilities at Brookhaven
National Laboratory.
West Valley Demonstration Project.--The Committee
recommends $65,500,000, an increase of $7,426,000 above the
request, to maintain progress on cleanup.
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$925,503,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 359,377,000
Committee recommendation................................ 588,322,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $390,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee's recommendation is $588,322,000, an increase
of $228,945,000 over the request to sustain cleanup activities
at the Paducah, Kentucky Gaseous Diffusion plant consistent
with fiscal year 2009 level of $116,446,000 for cleanup. The
Committee provides $225,000,000 for East Tennessee Technology
Park and $246,876,000 for Portsmouth, both as requested. We
note there is no request for reimbursement for Uranium/Thorium
cleanup contracts, and therefore provide nothing in our
recommendation.
The Committee did not adopt the administration's proposed
$200,000,000 tax on uranium fuel. The Committee is aware of the
fact that over $5,000,000,000 in available funding remains in
the UED&D fund. If this administration is serious about this
cleanup effort it should demonstrate it by increasing the
funding requests, not through budgetary gimmicks.
SCIENCE
Appropriations, 2009...................................\1\$6,372,636,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 4,941,682,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,898,832,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $1,600,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee recommends $4,898,832,000 for the Office of
Science. The Committee applauds the successes, which have been
achieved when the Department of Energy has collaborated with
the National Institutes of Health [NIH]. These successes
include the human genome project, advances in bioinformatics,
and breakthroughs in atomic resolution structural biology. The
Committee strongly encourages the DOE Office of Science and the
National Laboratories to reach out to the NIH to
institutionalize senior level contacts with the goal of
identifying opportunities for sustained collaboration in
research and development. The Committee notes that long-lasting
relationships are necessary to build the types of integrated
collaborative programs that could bring about breakthroughs in
biomedical imaging, systems biology, and other key areas of
research. The Committee directs the Office of Science, in
consultation with the NNSA, to review all radioactive materials
held by the Department of Energy and to work with science,
medical, industrial and agricultural groups to ascertain if
available inventories can be used in industrial or medical
applications and how to improve the utilization of existing
sources and avoid further production or importation of new
sources. Finally, the Office of Science, working with all the
relevant offices, is directed to make recommendations for
investment in U.S. facilities including research reactors or
accelerators that could be upgraded to provide domestic sources
for medical and industrial applications.
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
The Committee recommends $813,000,000 for High Energy
Physics. The Committee questions the increased investment in
Large Hadron Collider [LHC] support when the timing of the
restart of the LHC is in doubt. The Committee urges the Office
of Science and the LHC managers to improve communication on the
status of the LHC.
NUCLEAR PHYSICS
The Committee recommends $540,000,000 for Nuclear Physics.
Within the funds provided, $17,500,000 is for nuclear medicine
medical application research. The Committee emphasizes its
commitment to nuclear medicine medical application research at
the Department of Energy. All of the added funds must be
awarded competitively in one or more solicitation that includes
all sources--universities, the private sector, and Government
laboratories. Funding for nuclear medicine application research
was previously within the Biological and Environmental Research
program.
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
The Committee recommends $604,182,000 for Biological and
Environmental Research. The Committee recognizes the
international communities' reliance on the NNSA laboratories
expertise in climate change modeling and continues to believe
the NNSA laboratories are well equipped to develop and deploy a
national system for science-based stewardship that combines
advanced modeling, multi-scale monitoring, and impact analysis
tools. These laboratories, with their experience in nuclear
weapons nonproliferation and their unique capabilities across a
wide range of technical resources are able to make a
significant contribution in the development and implementation
of a comprehensive climate research strategy. The Committee
directs the Office of Science to continue to work closely with
the NNSA laboratories on climate change modeling.
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee recommends $1,653,500,000 for Basic Energy
Sciences. Of these funds $154,240,000 is provided for
construction activities as requested in the budget. The
remaining $1,499,260,000 is for research. The Committee does
not accept the proposed new break out of subaccounts within
Basic Energy Sciences as proposed by the budget.
Within the research funds provided $35,000,000 is for the
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
[EPSCoR]. The EPSCoR program is currently funding energy
research that will help reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
EPSCoR States have significant energy resources, contain or are
near national laboratories and already undertake research in
areas of importance to the Department and Nation. In fact, 6 of
the top 10 energy-producing States are EPSCoR States. In order
to keep up with the increased national focus on energy, the
Committee recommends that the limit of one Implementation Grant
per EPSCoR State be removed and the cap on the maximum
allowable award be increased to $2,500,000.
Within the funding provided, $15,000,000 is provided to
develop a second target station at the Spallation Neutron
Source. The Committee strongly encourages the Office of Science
to fully fund all major items of equipment requested in the
budget and provide full funding of facility operations within
this account.
ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH
The Committee recommends $399,000,000 for Advanced
Scientific Computing Research. The Committee expects the Office
of Science to continue to support joint research with the NNSA
laboratories through the Institute for Advanced Architecture
and Advanced Algorithms. Within the available funds, $5,000,000
shall be provided to collaborate in a joint program to enhance
the production of unconventional fossil energy using advanced
simulation and visualization.
FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee recommends $416,000,000 for Fusion Energy
Sciences.
SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE
The Committee recommends $133,600,000 to support
infrastructure activities, the same as the budget request.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
The Committee recommends $83,000,000 for Safeguards and
Security activities, the same as the budget request. The
program provides funding for physical security, information
protection, and cyber security for the national laboratories
and facilities of the Office of Science.
SCIENCE PROGRAM DIRECTION
The Committee recommends $194,722,000 for the Office of
Science Program Direction. The reduction from the budget
request reflects the Committee's primary continued concern
about the proposed large increase for field office personnel.
The Committee supports the $8,916,000 for the Office of Science
and Technical Information.
SCIENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
These initiatives support the mission of the Department's
Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists program. The
Committee recommends $20,678,000, the same as the budget
request.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $41,150,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of science
technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that
statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these
projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SCIENCE PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Manufacturing and $1,000,000 Senator Lugar
Engineering Equipment.
Alaska Climate Center.............. 1,000,000 Senator Murkowski
Antibodies Research................ 3,000,000 Senators Dorgan,
Conrad
Carbon Nanotube Technology Center 1,000,000 Senator Inhofe
[CANTEC].
Center for Advanced Bio-Based 950,000 Senator Grassley
Binders and Pollution Reduction
Technologies at the University of
Northern Iowa.
Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems.. 3,000,000 Senator Byrd
Center of Excellence and Hazardous 750,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom
Materials. Udall
Clean Energy Infrastructure 500,000 Senator Brown
Educational Initiative.
Climate Model Evaluation Program... 1,800,000 Senator Shelby
Computing Capability............... 5,000,000 Senators Dorgan,
Conrad
Development of Ultrafiltration 800,000 Senator Reid
Membrane-Separation Technology for
Energy-Efficient Water Treatment
and Desalination Process.
Enhancement for the Intermountain 600,000 Senator Bennett
Center for River Restoration and
Rehabilitation.
Environmental Quality Monitoring 500,000 Senator Durbin
and Analysis.
Fuel Cell Research, Brown 1,500,000 Senators Reed,
University, RI. Whitehouse
Functional MRI Research............ 1,200,000 Senator Leahy
Idaho Accelerator Center Production 1,500,000 Senators Crapo, Risch
of Medical Isotopes.
Kansas University Cancer Research 4,000,000 Senators Brownback,
Equipment. Roberts
Marine Systems Energy/Environmental 300,000 Senators Kennedy,
Sustainability Research. Kerry
Martin County Microfiber Hydrogen 1,000,000 Senators Burr, Hagen
Fuel Cell Technology Development.
Material Science Smart Coatings.... 500,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Nanotechnology Initiative.......... 750,000 Senators Dodd,
Lieberman
Nevada Water Resources Data, 500,000 Senator Reid
Modeling, and Visualization Center
[CAVE].
Performance Assessment Institute... 1,000,000 Senator Reid
Pioneer Valley Life Science 400,000 Senators Kennedy,
Institute Translational Biomedical Kerry
Research.
Renovation and Development of the 1,000,000 Senators Landrieu,
LSU Nuclear Science Building. Vitter
RNAI Research...................... 300,000 Senators Kennedy,
Kerry
Science Center Equipment and Energy 900,000 Senator Bennett
Efficient LEED Technology.
Smart Grid Communications Security 1,000,000 Senator Udall, Mark
Project.
SUU Science Center Energy 1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Efficiency Modernization and
Enhancement Project.
Targeted Radiotherapy for Melanoma. 300,000 Senators Kennedy,
Kerry
Technology Transfer and 750,000 Senator Bingaman
Commercialization of Technologies
at DOE Laboratories.
The New School Green Building...... 1,000,000 Senators Schumer,
Gillibrand
USD Catalysis Group for Alternative 1,100,000 Senator Johnson
Energy.
Yttrium-90 Microspheres Research... 1,250,000 Senator Murray
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$400,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 10,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $400,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee does not recommend the $10,000,000 requested.
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $145,390,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 98,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 98,400,000
The Committee recommends $98,400,000, the same as the
request. The Nuclear Waste Fund has a current balance of
$22,000,000,000 and generates annual interest of just over
$1,000,000,000 that is added to the corpus. The Committee
believes that interest accrued, being more than five times the
President's fiscal year 2010 budget proposal of $196,800,000,
is more than adequate to cover planned activities proposed in
this budget request and is not aware of any specific strategy
to execute the statutory obligations to manage both defense and
nondefense material consistent with the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act. Given the Administration's decision to terminate the Yucca
Mountain repository program while developing disposal
alternatives, the Committee expects the Secretary of Energy to
suspend collection of payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund.
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009...................................\1\$6,484,880,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 1,543,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 43,000,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $6,000,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFSETTING RECEIPTS
Appropriations, 2009.................................... -$19,880,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... -1,543,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ -43,000,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $6,465,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 1,500,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2009...................................\1\$7,520,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 20,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,000,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $7,510,000,000 under Public Law
110-329 and $10,000,000 under Public Law 111-5.
The Committee recommends the $20,000,000 requested.
Departmental Administration
(GROSS)
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $272,643,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 302,071,000
Committee recommendation................................ 293,684,000
(MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)
Appropriations, 2009.................................... -$117,317,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... -119,740,000
Committee recommendation................................ -119,740,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $155,326,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 182,331,000
Committee recommendation................................ -173,944,000
The Committee recommends $293,684,000 for Departmental
Administration, which provides a net appropriation of
$173,944,000 in fiscal year 2010. The Departmental
Administration account supports 10 Department-wide management
organizations including administrative, human resources,
financial, workforce diversity, congressional liaison, and
program management functions.
The January 2009 Small Refineries Exemption Study issued by
the Department of Energy was intended to determine whether
small refineries faced a disproportionate economic hardship in
meeting Renewable Fuel Standard [RFS] requirements beginning in
2011. The Committee understands the study contained inadequate
small refinery input, did not assess the economic condition of
the small refining sector, take into account regional factors
or accurately project RFS compliance costs. Therefore, the
Committee does not believe the study is complete, nor is the
Department able to make the required determination at this
time. In view of these deficiencies and the importance of the
study, the Department is directed to reopen and reassess the
Small Refineries Exemption Study by June 30, 2010. The
Department is specifically directed to seek and invite comment
from small refineries on the RFS exemption hardship question,
assess RFS compliance impacts on small refinery utilization
rates and profitability, evaluate the financial health and
ability of small refineries to meet RFS requirements, study
small refinery impacts and regional dynamics by PADD, and
reassess the accuracy of small refinery compliance costs
through the purchase of renewable fuel credits. Finally, the
Committee notes that the 2009 study does not estimate the price
of tradable fuel credits, but the Committee is aware that from
2008 to 2009, price has increased nearly threefold. The
Committee expects the Department to undertake an economic
review to estimate the actual economic impact of the RFS on
small refineries on a regional basis.
Office of the Inspector General
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$66,927,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 51,445,000
Committee recommendation................................ 51,927,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $15,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee recommends $51,927,000, the same as the
request.
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
National Nuclear Security Administration
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $6,410,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 6,384,431,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,468,267,000
The Committee recommends $6,468,267,000 for Nation Nuclear
Security Administration Weapons Activities.
DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK
Life Extension Programs.--The Committee recommends
$209,196,000 for the Life Extension Program, the same as the
budget request.
Stockpile Systems.--The Committee recommends $390,300,000,
the same as the request.
Weapons Dismantlement.--The Committee recommends
$84,100,000, the same as the request. The funding for the Pit
Disassembly and Conversion Facility has been moved from this
program to the Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities
(Construction) program.
Stockpile Services.--The Committee recommends $844,055,000.
The Committee recommends an increase of $30,000,000 to support
experimental activities at the Nevada Test Site needed to
support subcritical experiments in the Science and Advanced
Simulation and Computing Campaigns. No funding is provided to
support the transition of the tritium design and gas transfer
R&D mission as proposed in the Complex Transformation plan. An
independent study found there was no compelling economic or
programmatic justification for this move and the transfer fails
to deliver any amount of budgetary savings. In fact, NNSA's
preferred alternative would cost an additional $86,000,000
above the no action alternative. The NNSA has a poor record of
transferring mission responsibilities without considerable
disruption to the mission. Until the NNSA is able to provide
both an economic or programmatic justification, the Committee
will not support the transfer of tritium design and gas
transfer R&D missions.
CAMPAIGNS
The campaigns support scientific research, experimental
activities and advanced computation, which make up the core of
the science-based stockpile stewardship program. This program
has enabled the U.S. Government to ensure the safety,
reliability, and security of our nuclear weapons stockpile
without underground nuclear testing for the past 15 years.
However, due to declining investment in the core scientific
capabilities, a Task Force Report by the Defense Science Board
found the lack of funding in the Advanced Computing program
will not allow the NNSA to meet its nuclear weapons milestones.
At the same time, the existing stockpile continues to age
presenting new scientific challenges as required modifications
move each system further and further away from its test
validated state, further taxing the scientific capacity of the
complex to accurately predict the expected margins and
reliability of the aging stockpile. The Committee does not
believe this level of funding is adequate to support
modernization of the complex including critical investment in
infrastructure and scientific capabilities. The Committee
recommends additional funding for both categories. The
Committee recommends $1,589,230,000 for NNSA Campaigns, which
is $29,500,000 above the request, but $34,120,000 below current
year levels.
Science Campaign.--The Committee recommends $319,690,000,
an increase of $3,000,000 which is added to Primary Assessment
Technologies.
Engineering Campaign.--The Committee recommends
$150,000,000, consistent with the budget request.
Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield
Campaign.--The Committee provides $453,415,000, an increase of
$16,500,000 to restore operation to current year levels for
Sandia's Z machine and the University of Rochester Omega
facility. The Committee is frustrated with NNSA's inability to
provide a balanced program to support full operations at each
of the facilities which are each critical to understanding the
complex high energy density science. The Committee provides
$54,000,000 to Sandia to operate full shift operations and
$55,000,000 to the University of Rochester to support Omega
operations.
The Committee understands the NNSA is preparing to
establish an advisory board for the National Ignition Facility
experimental program, as recommended by the JASONS, and is
considering the establishment of a national ICF/HED advisory
committee. The Committee strongly supports the creation of an
independent advisory board over the national ICF science and
HED physics research. This panel should review the program
strategy to ensure the experimental program appropriately
manages the facilities and make recommendations on the
appropriate scientific and technical aspects of the
experimental program.
The NNSA is to be commended on completing construction of
the NIF and the Committee encourages the NNSA to focus on the
goal of ignition, for which this facility was built.
The Committee is concerned by the sole-source award of
target development, which is inconsistent with its own policy
guidelines. The Committee recognizes that competition will
drive innovation and savings into the program. The Committee
expects the NNSA to ensure that all future target fabrication
solicitations be competitively bid.
Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee
recommends $566,125,000 for the Advanced Simulation and
Computing [ASC] Campaign, an increase of $10,000,000. The
Committee is frustrated with the continued inconsistency in
funding requests between the Office of Science and the NNSA ASC
program and believes the Department has not done enough to
integrate the cooperation and research and development between
the two programs.
The Defense Science Board produced a report on Advanced
Computing in March 2009. The report outlined five primary
conclusions, which this Committee is in full agreement: (1) The
advanced simulation and computing program is the ``principal
tool'' for assuring the safety and surety of the nuclear
deterrent without underground nuclear testing; (2) The NNSA
advanced computing program has enabled the United States to be
the leader in high performance computing; (3) This program has
also advanced the science and development of advanced computing
which has broad applications in national security, energy and
the environmental research within the Department of Energy, but
other agencies and commercial enterprise as well; (4) The ``ASC
program needs significantly more resources in the future to
achieve the goals stated in its roadmaps and planning
documents. At currently projected levels of funding it will not
meet its nuclear weapons milestones in a timely manner and
perhaps not at all.''; and (5) The program requires additional
resources if the program hopes to achieve the next level of
high performance computing capability. The Committee expects
the Department to provide sufficient resources to address the
concerns raised by the Advanced Computing Task Force report and
improve its cooperation between other offices within the
Department of Energy to apply these advanced computational,
visualization and simulation capabilities to solving other
complex science and energy applications. This point was
specifically endorsed by the Defense Science Board Report as
well.
The Committee also urges the Department to continue to
support the development and collaboration with the Office of
Science in development of advanced algorithms and architectures
in high performance computing systems.
The Committee has provided an additional $10,000,000 in
this program of which $5,000,000 shall be applied to a joint
program with the Office of Fossil Energy and the Office of
Science to work in collaboration with universities and industry
to improve our capacity to produce domestic unconventional oil
and gas resources and minimize environmental impact through by
utilizing high performance computing capabilities.
As the demands of stockpile stewardship continue to push
the limits of parallel computing, power consumption is becoming
untenable. While the industry focuses on power-efficient
processor technology, there are additional opportunities to
increase computational performance and optimize energy savings
through improvement in storage systems. The ASC program is
directed to allocate $5,000,000 to explore aspects of cost-
effective, power-efficient storage systems.
Readiness Campaign.--The Committee recommends $100,000,000
for the Readiness Campaign, consistent with the budget request.
READINESS IN TECHNICAL BASE AND FACILITIES
The Committee recommends $1,848,870,000, an increase of
$112,522,000 above the request. The funding is provided to fill
significant gaps in infrastructure development at the NNSA
facilities. The Committee has restored funding to support the
design effort and to minimize job losses associated with the
Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement facility at Los
Alamos and the Uranium Process Facility at Y-12. The facilities
replace aging facilities which pose a serious threat to worker
health and safety and have been recommended to be closed by the
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The Committee urges
the NNSA to continue the design efforts to develop
appropriately sized facilities to support the mission needs.
The Committee has also restored funding for the LANSCE
Refurbishment project initiated last year by Congress. This
facility is the cornerstone of scientific research at Los
Alamos serving between 500-600 users per year. This facility
still supports a wide range of experiments in both open science
and classified work in support of the stockpile stewardship
mission. The investment in this facility upgrade is one of the
most cost-effect science investments and will support new
applications to support advanced materials research.
The Committee has also rescinded the prior year balances of
$42,100,000 for the High Explosive Pressing Facility that was
cancelled in this budget upgrade.
The Committee recommends $1,519,966,000, for the Readiness
in Technical Base and Facilities account. This funding supports
the operations and maintenance of the NNSA laboratories and
production facilities, equipment purchases and personnel. Of
these funds:
Operations of Facilities.--The Committee recommends
$1,329,303,000.
Program Readiness.--The Committee recommends the requested
amount of $73,021,000.
Material Recycle and Recovery.--The Committee recommends
the requested amount of $69,542,000.
Containers.--The Committee recommends the requested amount
of $23,392,000.
Storage.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of
$24,708,000.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $328,904,000, an
increase of $125,522,000. The Committee provided this funding
to make key investment in laboratory and plant infrastructure.
Project 10-D-501, Nuclear Facilities Risk Reduction, Y-12,
Oak Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee provides $12,500,000, as
requested to support critical facility upgrades.
Project 99-D-141, Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility
SRS.--The Committee recommends $30,321,000, as requested for
this facility.
Project 09-D-007, LANSCE Refurbishment Project, Los Alamos,
New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000 to refurbish
the LANSCE facility.
Project 09-D-404, Test capabilities revitalization II,
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.--The
Committee recommends $13,000,000.
Project 08-D-801, High Pressure Fire Loop, Pantex, Texas.--
The Committee recommends $31,190,000 as requested.
Project 06-D-140, Project Engineering Design [PED], Various
Locations.--The Committee recommends $16,200,000. The project
account supports ongoing design efforts for the TA-55
Reinvestment Project, Phase II at $5,200,000, and the
Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility at $11,000,000.
Project 06-D-141, Project Engineering Design [PED], Uranium
Process Facility, Y-12, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee
recommends $94,000,000 to sustain the design efforts of this
facility and prevent layoffs of critical design staff. The
Committee has separated the UPF project from the other PED
projects to improve oversight of this project.
Project 06-D-402, NTS replace Fire Stations 1&2 Nevada Test
Site, Nevada.--The Committee recommends $1,473,000, as
requested.
Project 04-D-125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Facility
Replacement Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New
Mexico.--The Committee recommends $98,000,000 to keep the
Radiological laboratory completion and equipment installation
on schedule and to sustain design efforts of the nuclear
facility.
Project 04-D-128, TA-18, Criticality Experiments Facility,
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Nevada Test Site, Nevada.--The
Committee recommends $1,500,000, the same as the budget
request.
SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET
The Committee recommendation for the Secure Transportation
Asset program is $234,915,000, the same as the budget request.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS INCIDENT RESPONSE
The Committee recommends full funding of the nuclear
weapons incident response program. The Committee provides
$221,936,000 as requested.
FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE RECAPITALIZATION
The Committee provides $154,922,000 for Facilities and
Infrastructure Recapitalization activities, consistent with the
budget request. This program was developed to reduce the
backlog in deferred maintenance of aging infrastructure
facilities throughout the complex.
SITE STEWARDSHIP
The Committee recommends $61,288,000 a reduction of
$29,086,000. The Committee is supportive of the materials
consolidation mission. The Committee has not provided funding
for the Stewardship planning initiative as the mission
priorities are poorly defined. The Committee has attempted to
restore mission critical investments in both science and
infrastructure and is unable to provide additional funding for
the proposed Stewardship planning activities. The Committee
urges the NNSA to work with the Federal Energy Management
Program, including independent third party energy providers,
the National Renewable Energy Lab, and universities to develop
a range of solutions in meeting the Federal renewable energy
goals. The Committee would encourage the Administration to use
ARRA funds for this project as long at those funds will be able
to provide 100 percent of the project and will not create any
future funding liability for this program.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
The Committee recommendation for the Safeguards and
Security Program is $871,555,000, as requested.
Defense Nuclear Security Operations and Maintenance.--The
Committee recommends the requested level of $700,044,000.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $49,000,000, the
same as the budget request.
Project 10-D-701 Security Improvement Project Y-12 Plant,
Oak Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends full funding of
$49,000,000 for this project.
Cybersecurity.--The Committee recommends the full request
of $122,511,000, which is $1,225,000 above the current year
levels. The Committee is concerned about increasing attempts to
penetrate NNSA firewalls and urges the NNSA to take this threat
seriously.
Use of Prior Year Balances.--The Committee recommends the
use of $42,100,000 of prior year balances from unexpended
balances of the cancelled High Explosive Pressing Facility at
Pantex.
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $1,537,350,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 2,136,709,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,136,709,000
The Committee recommends $2,136,709,000. The Committee has
provided full funding for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication
Facility to support the nonproliferation mission of destroying
excess plutonium in United States and Russian stockpiles. The
Committee is aware that the administration is preparing to sign
an agreement with Russia accepting the use of fast reactors to
burn plutonium as their preferred path for disposal. The
Committee is aware that the administration intends to provide
$400,000,000 in funding to support the Russian effort
consistent with previous U.S. policy commitments. However, the
budget request did not include the estimated $100,000,000 in
funding needed to fulfill those commitments in this fiscal year
and this Committee does not have the resources to cover this
shortfall. In addition, the Committee does not include any of
the funding requested to support the denuclearization work in
North Korea. The Committee is supportive of this work, but
until relations improve, the Committee has applied this funding
to improving the U.S. capability to develop advanced nuclear
nonproliferation and detection technologies.
NONPROLIFERATION AND VERIFICATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommends $337,300,000, an increase of
$40,000,000 to support expanded investment in developing
advanced nuclear detection technologies. Within the available
funds, the Committee provides $15,000,000 to support the
Integrated University Program consistent with the section 313
of Public Law 111-8. The program is directed to cooperate with
the Office of Nonproliferation and International Security in
developing education and research funding priorities for
advanced nuclear safeguards research.
Also, within available funds, the Committee provides
$6,000,000 for NNSA laboratories for the purpose of applying
their expertise and advanced computational, modeling and
simulation capabilities to the Nation's space situational
awareness requirements. NNSA should execute this effort in
collaboration with the Air Force's efforts to ensure the
freedom of U.S. space operations and counter emerging threats
to space operations.
NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
The Committee recommends $187,202,000 a reduction of
$20,000,000. The reduction is tied to $40,000,000 in funding
requested for North Korea. If, in the future, North Korea
renews its commitment to denuclearization; the Committee would
be willing to work with the NNSA to provide additional funding
for that mission.
INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND COOPERATION
The Committee recommends $522,300,000 as requested. The
Committee has provided strong support to this program over the
past decade and believes this is an important mission. However,
the Committee wants to ensure that the U.S. investments in
Russian materials control and security are maintained. The
Committee expects the Russian Government to share in the
operations and maintenance responsibilities. The Committee
intends to closely follow this matter to ensure Russia fulfills
its obligations and United States resources are not wasted.
ELIMINATION OF WEAPONS-GRADE PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION
The Committee recommends $24,507,000 as requested by the
Administration.
FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION
The Committee recommends $701,900,000 as requested to
support the plutonium disposition program and construction
projects.
U.S. Surplus Fissile Materials Disposition.--The Committee
provides for the full request of $126,662,000, including
$90,896,000 for the U.S. plutonium disposition and $34,691,000
as requested for the U.S. uranium disposition program.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $574,238,000 to
support construction as requested.
Project 99-D-143, Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility,
Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee recommends
$504,238 as requested.
Project 99-D-141-02, Waste Solidification Building,
Savannah River South Carolina.--The Committee recommends full
funding of $70,000,000 for this project.
Russian Surplus Materials Disposition.--The Committee
recommends $1,000,000, as requested. If President Obama and
Russian President Medvedev sign a plutonium disposition
strategy, this budget does not provide adequate resources to
fulfill the U.S. requirements under that agreement and
additional resources must be found.
GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE
The Committee recommends $333,500,000. The Committee
recommendation does not include funding requested for North
Korea in this program. The Committee recognizes the shortfall
in supplies of isotope Molybedenum-99 for the use in medical
treatments and provides $20,000,000 to advance the creation of
a domestic supply of this isotope. The Committee recommends
that not less than $10,000,000 within available funds be made
available to undertake a full inventory of all Department of
Energy and NNSA nuclear material to determine if there are
materials that have value and can be reused in other mission or
commercial applications. These funds are to be shared with the
relevant programs across the Department to support the
Committee's direction. In February 2009, the Department of
Energy Inspector General released a report that found that DOE
could not account for 37 percent of the quantities or location
of nuclear materials that had been loaned or leased for
research or medical purposes. This inventory is managed by the
Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission through
the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards Systems. In
addition to the lack of rigorous management of existing
inventories, the Committee is concerned that the new nuclear
sources are being created without consideration of how these
will ultimately be tracked, stored and safely disposed. This
issue was addressed during March 2009 International Atomic
Energy Agency workshop, which urged a more comprehensive
``cradle to grave'' management strategy of medical and
industrial seal radioactive sources. Using the funds provided,
the Committee expects this office to work with the Office of
Science, the Office of Nuclear Energy, all of the relevant
Department of Energy Laboratories, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and other relevant Federal agencies, academia and
industry to identify the location, status and proposed disposal
pathway for all known radioactive source materials and which
Federal agency has responsibility for this material. The
Department of Energy is directed to implement the
recommendations made by the Inspector General [DOE/IG-0813] and
update the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards Systems
and report to the Committee on Appropriations on the status of
any inconsistency in that report or unaccounted materials.
Naval Reactors
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $828,054,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 1,003,133,000
Committee recommendation................................ 973,133,000
The Committee provides $973,133,000 for the Naval Reactor
program to provide the U.S. Navy with nuclear propulsion plants
that are capable of responding to the challenges of 21st
century security concerns. The Committee recommends
$905,533,000 for operations and maintenance. The Committee is
aware that additional funding has been provided to offset
pension shortfalls in this program, but is concerned that
additional funding may be needed. The Committee directs the
Secretary to utilize authorities provided in section 311 to
prevent any reduction in mission funding.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000 as
requested for the various construction projects proposed in the
budget request.
Office of the Administrator
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $439,190,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 420,754,000
Committee recommendation................................ 420,754,000
The Committee recommends $420,754,000 of the Office of the
Administrator.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2009..................................\1\$10,784,250,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 5,495,831,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,763,856,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $5,127,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental
Cleanup is $5,763,856,000. Within the total provided, the
Department is directed to fund the Hazardous Waste Worker
Training Program [HAZWOPER] at $10,000,000.
The Committee had hoped with the new administration that
the Cleanup budget submittal would--for the first time in
years--request sufficient funding to be legally compliant.
Sadly, it appears that the administration decided to lean on
the Recovery Act funding to meet many of its fiscal year 2010
compliance milestones. The result is that it has deliberately
underfunded the base program that should have requested funds
to meet those fiscal year 2010 milestones. Next year, rather
than parading out expensive new initiatives, the administration
should consider meeting its basic legal, moral, and human
commitments to clean up nuclear research and cold war sites.
The Committee is aware of the potential for significant
shortfalls in this budget because the program may have to cover
defined-benefit pension contributions later this year. We have
included a general provision that will permit the Secretary to
take steps to address the programmatic shortfalls that could
occur once the impact of the pension contributions becomes
clearer at the end of the calendar year.
Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2010, the
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between
operating expense-funded projects within the controls listed
below using guidance contained in the Department's budget
execution manual [DOE M 135.1-1A, Chapter IV]. All capital
construction line item projects remain separate controls from
the operating projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the
House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all
reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the
Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of a
congressional response. The Committee recommends the following
reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2010:
--Closure sites;
--Hanford site;
--Idaho National Laboratory;
--NNSA sites;
--Oak Ridge Reservation;
--Office of River Protection;
--Savannah River site;
--Waste Isolation Pilot Plant;
--Program Direction;
--Program Support;
--Technology Development and Deployment;
--Safeguards and Security; and
--All capital construction line items, regardless of site.
Internal Reprogramming Authority.--The new reprogramming
control points above obviates, in most cases, the need for
internal reprogramming authority. However, at the few sites to
which the internal reprogramming statute still applies,
Environmental Management site managers may transfer up to
$5,000,000, one time, between accounts listed above to reduce
health and safety risks, gain cost savings, or complete
projects, as long as a program or project is not increased or
decreased by more than $5,000,000 in total during the fiscal
year.
The reprogramming authority--either formal or internal--may
not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on
Appropriations in the House and Senate must be notified within
30 days after the use of the internal reprogramming authority.
Closure Sites.--The Committee recommends $41,468,000, the
same as the request.
Hanford Site.--The Committee recommends $1,023,080,000. An
additional $53,000,000 is provided for characterization of
groundwater, waste sites, and preparation of remedial
investigations and feasibility studies for the Central Plateau,
all aimed at completing CERCLA remedial decisions and
continuing Central Plateau cleanup in the 2012-2013 timeframe.
Another $27,000,000 of the increase is for continued treatment
of Mixed Low Level Waste, disposal of Low Level Waste and
retrieval and processing of Transuranic Waste. Finally,
$40,000,000 is provided to support sludge treatment for the K-
Basins sludge. The Committee understands the Department's
continued support of the B-Reactor Museum and the Hazardous
Materials Management and Emergency Response [HAMMER]
facilities, which are provided for within available funds.
Idaho National Laboratory.--The Committee recommends
$470,168,000, an increase of $64,000,000 to the request, all
for Soil and Groundwater Remediation.
NNSA Sites.--The Committee recommends $291,624,000, an
increase of $15,000,000 over the request. The additional
$15,000,000 is for Los Alamos National Laboratory to place two
regional ground water characterization wells and complete a
Field Investigation and subsequent Report of Materials Disposal
Area AB to maintain regulatory compliance.
Oak Ridge Reservation.--The Committee recommends
$153,768,000, the same as the request.
Office of River Protection.--The Committee recommends
$1,098,000,000, the same as the request. The Waste Treatment
and Immobilization Plant is funded at $690,000,000, and is
considered a single line-item construction project. Funding may
be moved between subprojects.
Savannah River Site.--The Committee recommends
$1,242,974,000, an increase of $33,025,000 above the request.
The increase is applied to the Soil and Groundwater Remediation
project, which was unfunded in the request.
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.--The Committee recommends
$235,337,000. This recommendation includes funding for Carlsbad
educational support, infrastructure improvements resulting from
operations at WIPP and for construction of the WIPP digital
records center, activities the program found meritorious enough
to support in fiscal year 2009.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $355,000,000,
the same as the request. The Committee recognizes and supports
the need for more Federal employees to manage the cleanup
contracts. However, the fiscal year 2010 request includes 52
new hires at headquarters (+17 percent), which is more than
half the number of new hires at all the field offices combined
(+97, +9.3 percent). Cleanup work is done in the field, where
the cleanup contracts are executed, not at headquarters. The
program would be well advised to constrain the number of
Headquarters new hires.
Program Support.--The Committee recommends $34,000,000, the
same as the request.
Technology Development and Deployment.--The Committee
recommends $55,000,000, the same as the request. This program
languished for years without support, or even recognition, of
Environmental Management's long-term mission. The new
administration seems to be taking a fresh look at the need for
break-through technologies that can, as the National Research
Council's March 2, 2009 report highlights, permit this program
to be completed safely, cost-effectively, and expeditiously.
The Committee supports the Technology Development and
Deployment program's involvement this year with the Office of
River Protection, whose budget includes $50,000,000 to advance
solutions for the treatment of radioactive waste including pre-
treatment processes, tank structural integrity, and advanced
retrieval technologies.
Safeguards and Security.--The Committee recommends
$296,437,000, a total of $17,000,000 above the request. The
increase is primarily to avoid workforce impacts where prior
year funding may no longer be available and to provide for
security investigations for field personnel, reflecting a
change in Departmental practice.
Federal Contribution to Uranium Enrichment Decontamination
and Decommissioning Fund.--The Committee recommends
$463,000,000, the same as the request.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $4,000,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of defense
environmental cleanup technologies or programs. The Committee
reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing requirements may
apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Characteristics and Cleanup of the $4,000,000 Senator Cochran
U.S. Nuclear Legacy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Defense Activities
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $1,314,063,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 852,468,000
Committee recommendation................................ 854,468,000
The Committee recommendation is $854,468,000, a decrease of
$461,595,000 from current year levels reflecting the shift for
the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility from this program to
the Office of Nuclear Nonproliferation. The recommended level
is consistent with the budget request.
Health, Safety and Security.--The Committee recommends
$449,882,000, as requested.
Office of Legacy Management.--The Committee recommends
$189,802,000 as requested.
Nuclear Energy.--The Committee recommends $83,358,000 for
Idaho infrastructure for sitewide safeguards and security, the
same as the request.
Defense-related Administrative Support.--The Committee
recommends $122,982,000, the same as the request.
Office of Hearings and Appeals.--The Committee recommends
$6,444,000, as requested.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $2,000,000 for the following list of projects of Other
Defense Activities. The Committee reminds recipients that
statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these
projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burlington Atomic Energy Commission $1,000,000 Senator Harkin
Plant [BAECP] and Ames Laboratory
Former Workers Medical
Surveillance Programs [FWP].
Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, $1,000,000 Senator McConnell
Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $143,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 98,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 98,400,000
The Committee recommends $98,400,000 for Defense Nuclear
Waste Disposal activities, the same as the request.
Power Marketing Administrations
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
The Bonneville Power Administration is the Department of
Energy's marketing agency for electric power in the Pacific
Northwest. Bonneville provides electricity to a 300,000 square
mile service area in the Columbia River drainage basin.
Bonneville markets the power from Federal hydropower projects
in the Northwest, as well as power from non-Federal generating
facilities in the region. Bonneville also exchanges and markets
surplus power with Canada and California. The Committee
recommends no new borrowing authority for BPA during fiscal
year 2010.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $7,420,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 8,638,000
Committee recommendation................................ 8,638,000
For the Southeastern Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $8,638,000, the same as the budget request.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $28,414,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 44,944,000
Committee recommendation................................ 44,944,000
For the Southwestern Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $44,944,000, the same as the budget request.
CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA
POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... \1\$228,346,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 256,711,000
Committee recommendation................................ 256,711,000
\1\Includes emergency appropriations of $10,000,000 under Public Law
111-5.
For the Western Area Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $256,711,000, the same as the budget request.
In this and subsequent fiscal years, the Committee
recommends adopting the proposal presented in the President's
budget request to reclassify from mandatory to discretionary
those power receipts associated with the repayment of Western's
annual expenses in this appropriations account. Such receipts
will now be credited to this account as discretionary
offsetting collections available for the sole purpose of
funding the annual expenses of Program Direction and Operations
and Maintenance (but excluding Purchase Power and Wheeling) of
this account. This change does not convert this account into a
revolving fund, since the Committee must specify a dollar limit
on this activity in annual appropriations acts. For fiscal year
2010, the Committee recommends that no more than $147,530,000
be credited to this account for this purpose.
The Committee directs the Western Area Power Administration
to continue to collaborate with its firm power customers to
develop annual work plans and accept funds advanced by
customers to the extent such customers deem funds to be
available, pursuant to its existing authorities.
For fiscal year 2010, the Committee supports a total
program level for this account of $899,317,000, which includes
$104,971,000 for Construction and Rehabilitation, $57,159,000
for Operations and Maintenance, $548,847,000 for Purchase Power
and Wheeling, and $180,756,000 for Program Direction. The
Committee recommends $7,584,000 for the Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation.
Offsetting collections total $501,216,000, consisting of
$147,530,000 for Western's annual expenses, $349,807,000 for
Purchase Power and Wheeling, and $3,879,000 from the Colorado
River Dam Fund (as authorized in Public Law 98-381).
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $2,959,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 2,568,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,568,000
The Falcon Dam and Amistad Dam on the Rio Grande River
generate power through hydroelectric facilities and sell this
power to public utilities through the Western Power
Administration. This fund, created in the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, defrays the
costs of operation, maintenance, and emergency activities and
is administered by the Western Area Power Administration. For
the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund, the
Committee recommends $2,568,000 the same as the request.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $273,400,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 298,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 298,000,000
REVENUES APPLIED
Appropriations, 2009.................................... -$273,400,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... -298,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ -298,000,000
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee recommendation
Committee compared to--
Enacted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------
Enacted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D:
Hydrogen Technology............................................ 168,960 ............... 190,000 +21,040 +190,000
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)................. 43,400 ............... ............... -43,400 ...............
Fuel cell technologies......................................... ............... 68,213 ............... ............... -68,213
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D............................ 217,000 235,000 235,000 +18,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)................. 786,500 ............... ............... -786,500 ...............
Solar energy................................................... 175,000 320,000 255,000 +80,000 -65,000
Wind energy.................................................... 55,000 75,000 85,000 +30,000 +10,000
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)................. 118,000 ............... ............... -118,000 ...............
Geothermal technology.......................................... 44,000 50,000 50,000 +6,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)................. 400,000 ............... ............... -400,000 ...............
Water Power.................................................... 40,000 30,000 60,000 +20,000 +30,000
Vehicle technologies........................................... 273,238 333,302 323,302 +50,064 -10,000
Building technologies.......................................... 140,000 237,698 202,698 +62,698 -35,000
Industrial technologies........................................ 90,000 100,000 100,000 +10,000 ...............
Federal energy management program.............................. 22,000 32,272 32,272 +10,272 ...............
RE-ENERGYSE (Regaining our energy science and engineering edge) ............... 115,000 ............... ............... -115,000
Facilities and infrastructure:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]................ 22,000 19,000 19,000 -3,000 ...............
Construction:
10-EE-01 South table mountain ingress/egress and ............... 44,000 44,000 +44,000 ...............
traffic capacity upgrades, National Renewable Energy
Laboratory, Golden, CO................................
08-EE-02 South-table mountain site infrastructure 13,000 ............... ............... -13,000 ...............
development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Golden, CO............................................
08-EE-01 Energy systems integration facility, National 41,000 ............... ............... -41,000 ...............
Renewal Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.................
07-EE-01 Integrated Biorefinery research facility, 13,500 ............... ............... -13,500 ...............
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO
(emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5)............
06-EE-01 Research support facility project, National 68,000 ............... ............... -68,000 ...............
Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO (emergency
appropriation Public Law 111-5).......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................. 135,500 44,000 44,000 -91,500 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Facilities and infrastructure.............. 157,500 63,000 63,000 -94,500 ...............
Advanced battery manufacturing:
Emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5................... 2,000,000 ............... ............... -2,000,000 ...............
Alternative fueled vehicles pilot grant program:
Emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5................... 300,000 ............... ............... -300,000 ...............
Transportation electrification:
Emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5................... 400,000 ............... ............... -400,000 ...............
Energy efficient appliance rebate program:
Emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5................... 300,000 ............... ............... -300,000 ...............
Information and communication efficiency:
Emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5................... 50,000 ............... ............... -50,000 ...............
Program direction: 127,620 238,117 152,620 +25,000 -85,497
Emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5................... 50,000 ............... ............... -50,000 ...............
Program support: 18,157 120,000 72,000 +53,843 -48,000
RDD&D...................................................... 5,976,375 2,017,602 1,820,892 -4,155,483 -196,710
Energy efficiency and conservation block grants--competitive 400,000 ............... ............... -400,000 ...............
(emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5)........................
Energy efficiency and conservation block grants--Subtitle E, title 2,800,000 ............... ............... -2,800,000 ...............
V, EISA (emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5)................
Weatherization and intragovernmental:
Weatherization:
Weatherization assistance.................................. ............... 220,000 200,000 +200,000 -20,000
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 4,900,000 ............... ............... -4,900,000 ...............
Training and technical assistance.......................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 100,000 ............... ............... -100,000 ...............
Weatherization and technical assistance.................... 200,000 ............... ............... -200,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization................................. 5,200,000 220,000 200,000 -5,000,000 -20,000
Other:
State energy program grants................................ 50,000 75,000 50,000 ............... -25,000
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 3,100,000 ............... ............... -3,100,000 ...............
International renewable energy program..................... 5,000 ............... ............... -5,000 ...............
Tribal energy activities................................... 6,000 6,000 10,000 +4,000 +4,000
Renewable energy production incentive...................... 5,000 ............... 5,000 ............... +5,000
Asia pacific............................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other.......................................... 3,166,000 81,000 65,000 -3,101,000 -16,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization and intragovernmental........... 8,366,000 301,000 265,000 -8,101,000 -36,000
Energy efficiency and renewable energy research and development 970,600 ............... ............... -970,600 ...............
[EERE R&D] (emergency appropriation Public Law 111-5).............
Use of prior year balances......................................... -13,238 ............... ............... +13,238 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 228,803 ............... 148,075 -80,728 +148,075
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110-329)...................... 250,000 ............... ............... -250,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY................. 18,978,540 2,318,602 2,233,967 -16,744,573 -84,635
Appropriations........................................... (1,928,540) (2,318,602) (2,233,967) (+305,427) (-84,635)
Emergency appropriations................................. (17,050,000) ............... ............... (-17,050,000) ...............
ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
Research and development:
High temperature superconductivity R&D......................... 23,796 ............... ............... -23,796 ...............
Visiualization and controls.................................... 24,373 ............... ............... -24,373 ...............
Energy storage and power electronics........................... 6,552 ............... ............... -6,552 ...............
Renewable and distributed systems integration.................. 30,000 ............... ............... -30,000 ...............
Clean energy transmission and reliability...................... ............... 42,000 42,000 +42,000 ...............
Smart grid research and development............................ ............... 67,000 32,000 +32,000 -35,000
Energy storage................................................. ............... 15,000 15,000 +15,000 ...............
Cyber security for energy delivery systems..................... ............... 50,000 50,000 +50,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research and development........................... 84,721 174,000 139,000 +54,279 -35,000
Operations and analysis............................................ 11,451 ............... ............... -11,451 ...............
Permitting, siting, and analysis................................... ............... 6,400 6,400 +6,400 ...............
Infrastructure security and energy restoration..................... ............... 6,188 6,188 +6,188 ...............
Program direction.................................................. 21,180 21,420 21,420 +240 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)..................... 22,500 ............... ............... -22,500 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.............................. 19,648 ............... 6,475 -13,173 +6,475
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5):
Smart grid investment program [EISA 1306].................. 3,375,700 ............... ............... -3,375,700 ...............
Smart grid regional and energy storage demos............... 700,000 ............... ............... -700,000 ...............
Workforce training......................................... 100,000 ............... ............... -100,000 ...............
Interoperability standards and framework................... 10,288 ............... ............... -10,288 ...............
Interconnection planning and analysis...................... 80,000 ............... ............... -80,000 ...............
Other recovery act......................................... 211,512 ............... ............... -211,512 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY....... 4,637,000 208,008 179,483 -4,457,517 -28,525
Appropriations....................................... (137,000) (208,008) (179,483) (+42,483) (-28,525)
Emergency appropriations............................. (4,500,000) ............... ............... (-4,500,000) ...............
====================================================================================
NUCLEAR ENERGY
Research and development:
Integrated university program.................................. 5,000 ............... 5,000 ............... +5,000
Nuclear power 2010............................................. 177,500 20,000 120,000 -57,500 +100,000
Generation IV nuclear energy systems........................... 180,000 191,000 143,000 -37,000 -48,000
Nuclear hydrogen initiative.................................... 7,500 ............... ............... -7,500 ...............
Advanced fuel cycle initiative................................. 145,000 ............... ............... -145,000 ...............
Fuel cycle research and development............................ ............... 192,000 145,000 +145,000 -47,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research and development........................... 515,000 403,000 413,000 -102,000 +10,000
Infrastructure:
Radiological facilities management:
Space and defense infrastructure........................... 35,000 47,000 47,000 +12,000 ...............
Research reactor infrastructure............................ 6,146 ............... 15,000 +3,854 +10,000
Oak Ridge nuclear infrastructure........................... 12,500 ............... ............... -12,500 ...............
Los Alamos nuclear infrastructure.......................... 12,500 ............... ............... -12,500 ...............
PU-238 production restart project.......................... ............... 30,000 ............... +5,000 -25,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Radiological facilities management............. 66,146 77,000 62,000 -4,146 -15,000
INL infrastructure:
INL Operations and infrastructure.......................... 140,000 203,402 211,274 +71,274 +7,872
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security..................... 78,811 83,358 83,358 +4,547 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, INL Infrastructure............................. 284,957 363,760 356,632 +71,675 -7,128
Program direction.................................................. 73,000 77,872 73,000 ............... -4,872
Use of prior year balances......................................... -5,000 ............... ............... +5,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nuclear Energy..................................... 867,957 844,632 842,632 -25,325 -2,000
====================================================================================
Funding from other defense activities.............................. -78,811 -83,358 -83,358 -4,547 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 2,854 ............... 2,000 -854 +2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY........................................ 792,000 761,274 761,274 -30,726 ...............
====================================================================================
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY
Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009................. 149,000 ............... ............... -149,000 ...............
Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D [CCPI]............................... -149,000 ............... ............... +149,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
====================================================================================
FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Clean coal power initiative........................................ 288,174 ............... ............... -288,174 ...............
FutureGen.......................................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Fuels and Power Systems:
Innovations for existing plants................................ 50,000 41,000 58,000 +8,000 +17,000
Advanced integrated gasification combined cycle................ 65,236 55,000 65,000 -236 +10,000
Advanced turbines.............................................. 28,000 31,000 32,000 +4,000 +1,000
Carbon sequestration........................................... 150,000 179,865 160,200 +10,200 -19,665
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5):
Carbon capture and storage................................. 1,000,000 ............... ............... -1,000,000 ...............
Geologic sequestration site characterization............... 50,000 ............... ............... -50,000 ...............
Geologic sequestration training and research grant program. 20,000 ............... ............... -20,000 ...............
Clean coal power initiative round 3........................ 800,000 ............... ............... -800,000 ...............
Carbon capture competitive solicitation.................... 1,520,000 ............... ............... -1,520,000 ...............
Fuels.......................................................... 25,000 15,000 25,000 ............... +10,000
Fuel cells..................................................... 58,000 54,000 58,000 ............... +4,000
Advanced research.............................................. 28,000 28,000 30,000 +2,000 +2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Fuels and power systems............................ 3,794,236 403,865 428,200 -3,366,036 +24,335
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Coal............................................... 4,082,410 403,865 428,200 -3,654,210 +24,335
Appropriations........................................... (692,410) (403,865) (428,200) (-264,210) (+24,335)
Emergency appropriations................................. (3,390,000) ............... ............... (-3,390,000) ...............
Natural Gas Technologies........................................... 20,000 25,000 25,000 +5,000 ...............
Petroleum--Oil Technologies........................................ 5,000 ............... 25,000 +20,000 +25,000
Program direction.................................................. 152,000 158,000 158,000 +6,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)..................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
Plant and Capital Equipment........................................ 18,000 20,000 20,000 +2,000 ...............
Fossil energy environmental restoration............................ 9,700 10,000 10,000 +300 ...............
Special recruitment programs....................................... 656 700 700 +44 ...............
Cooperative research and development............................... 5,000 ............... 5,000 ............... +5,000
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 43,864 ............... 27,300 -16,564 +27,300
Use of prior year balances......................................... -70,310 ............... ............... +70,310 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................ 4,276,320 617,565 699,200 -3,577,120 +81,635
Appropriations........................................... (876,320) (617,565) (699,200) (-177,120) (+81,635)
Emergency appropriations................................. (3,400,000) ............... ............... (-3,400,000) ...............
NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES............................. 19,099 23,627 23,627 +4,528 ...............
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................................ 205,000 ............... ............... -205,000 ...............
Storage facilities development................................. ............... 209,482 239,482 +239,482 +30,000
Management for SPR operations.................................. ............... 19,591 19,591 +19,591 ...............
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................... 205,000 229,073 259,073 +54,073 +30,000
NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE................................. 9,800 11,300 11,300 +1,500 ...............
ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION.................................. 110,595 133,058 110,595 ............... -22,463
NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)............................... 10,755 7,652 7,652 -3,103 ...............
Operating expenses................................................. 48,296 104,444 104,444 +56,148 ...............
02-U-101, Depleted uranium hexafluoride conversion facility........ 33,000 ............... ............... -33,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Gaseous Diffusion Plants.............................. 81,296 104,444 104,444 +23,148 ...............
Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion, 02-U-101................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Small Sites:
Argonne National Lab........................................... 9,479 ............... ............... -9,479 ...............
Transfer from Science...................................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
Transfer from NNSA......................................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)................. 98,500 ............... ............... -98,500 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Argonne National Lab........................... 127,979 ............... ............... -127,979 ...............
Brookhaven National Lab........................................ 8,433 12,614 17,500 +9,067 +4,886
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)................. 42,355 ............... ............... -42,355 ...............
Idaho National Lab............................................. 13,478 5,000 5,000 -8,478 ...............
Consolidated Business Center:
California Site support.................................... 187 262 262 +75 ...............
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center......................... 4,883 4,600 4,600 -283 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 7,925 ............... ............... -7,925 ...............
Energy Technology Engineering Center....................... 15,000 13,000 13,000 -2,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 54,175 ............... ............... -54,175 ...............
Los Alamos National Lab.................................... 1,905 ............... ............... -1,905 ...............
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 14,775 ............... ............... -14,775 ...............
Moab....................................................... 40,699 30,671 40,671 -28 +10,000
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)............. 108,350 ............... ............... -108,350 ...............
Tuba City.................................................. 5,000 ............... ............... -5,000 ...............
Completed sites administration and support................. 1,100 1,200 1,200 +100 ...............
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (emergency appropriation, 78,800 ............... ............... -78,800 ...............
Public Law 111-5).........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Consolidated Business Center................... 332,799 49,733 59,733 -273,066 +10,000
Funding from Science, NNSA................................. -20,000 ............... ............... +20,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Small Sites.................................... 505,044 67,347 82,233 -422,811 +14,886
West Valley Demonstration Project.................................. 65,500 58,074 65,500 ............... +7,426
Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111-5)..................... 73,875 ............... ............... -73,875 ...............
AARA Non-defense program direction (emergency appropriation, Public 2,415 ............... ............... -2,415 ...............
Law 111-5)........................................................
ARRA Non-defense unallocated (emergency appropriation, Public Law 1,830 ............... ............... -1,830 ...............
111-5)............................................................
Use of Prior year balances......................................... -653 ............... ............... +653 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 4,757 ............... ............... -4,757 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP..................... 744,819 237,517 259,829 -484,990 +22,312
Appropriations........................................... (261,819) (237,517) (259,829) (-1,990) (+22,312)
Emergency appropriations................................. (483,000) ............... ............... (-483,000) ...............
====================================================================================
URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
Decontamination and decommissioning................................ 525,503 559,377 588,322 +62,819 +28,945
Uranium/thorium reimbursement...................................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5):
Uranium/thorium reimbursement.............................. 68,950 ............... ............... -68,950 ...............
ARRA Oak Ridge............................................. 118,200 ............... ............... -118,200 ...............
AARA Paducah............................................... 78,800 ............... ............... -78,800 ...............
ARRA Portsmouth............................................ 118,200 ............... ............... -118,200 ...............
ARRA program direction..................................... 1,950 ............... ............... -1,950 ...............
ARRA unallocated........................................... 3,900 ............... ............... -3,900 ...............
Offsetting collections............................................. ............... -200,000 ............... ............... +200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UED&D FUND/URANIUM INVENTORY CLEANUP.................. 925,503 359,377 588,322 -337,181 +228,945
====================================================================================
SCIENCE
High energy physics:
Proton accelerator-based physics............................... 410,343 442,988 436,988 +26,645 -6,000
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 107,990 ............... ............... -107,990 ...............
Electron accelerator-based physics............................. 48,772 26,420 26,420 -22,352 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 1,400 ............... ............... -1,400 ...............
Non-accelerator physics........................................ 86,482 99,321 99,321 +12,839 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 4,445 ............... ............... -4,445 ...............
Theoretical physics............................................ 63,036 67,240 67,240 +4,204 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 5,975 ............... ............... -5,975 ...............
Advanced technology R&D........................................ 187,093 183,031 183,031 -4,062 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 112,580 ............... ............... -112,580 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, High energy physics............................... 1,028,116 819,000 813,000 -215,116 -6,000
Nuclear physics.................................................... 481,019 530,000 518,000 +36,981 -12,000
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 89,800 ............... ............... -89,800 ...............
Construction:
07-SC-02 Electron beam ion source Brookhaven National 2,438 ............... ............... -2,438 ...............
Laboratory, NY............................................
06-SC-01 Project engineering and design [PED] 12 GeV 28,623 22,000 22,000 -6,623 ...............
continuous electron beam accelerator facility upgrade,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator facility (was
project 07-SC-001), Newport News, VA......................
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.............. 65,000 ............... ............... -65,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear physics............................... 666,880 552,000 540,000 -126,880 -12,000
Biological and environmental research:
Biological research............................................ 423,613 ............... ............... -423,613 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 100,793 ............... ............... -100,793 ...............
Climate change research........................................ 177,927 ............... ............... -177,927 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 64,860 ............... ............... -64,860 ...............
Biological systems science..................................... ............... 318,476 318,476 +318,476 ...............
Climate and environmental sciences............................. ............... 285,706 285,706 +285,706 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Biological and environmental research................. 767,193 604,182 604,182 -163,011 ...............
Basic energy sciences:
Research:
Materials sciences and engineering research................ 1,129,391 381,112 1,172,903 +43,512 +791,791
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.............. 236,798 ............... ............... -236,798 ...............
Chemical sciences, geosciences, and energy:
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.............. 154,062 ............... ............... -154,062 ...............
Biosciences............................................ 297,113 338,357 326,357 +29,244 -12,000
Scientific user facilities................................. ............... 811,791 ............... ............... -811,791
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research....................................... 1,817,364 1,531,260 1,499,260 -318,104 -32,000
Construction:
08-SC-01 Advanced light source [ALS] user support building, 11,500 ............... ............... -11,500 ...............
LBNL, CA..................................................
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.............. 14,546 ............... ............... -14,546 ...............
08-SC-11 Photon ultrafast laser science and engineering 3,728 ............... ............... -3,728 ...............
[PULSE] building renovation, SLAC, CA.....................
07-SC-06 Project engineering and design [PED]:
National Synchrotron light source II [NSLS-II]......... 93,273 139,000 139,000 +45,727 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.......... 150,000 ............... ............... -150,000 ...............
05-R-320 LINAC coherent light source [LCLS]................ 36,967 15,240 15,240 -21,727 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................... 310,014 154,240 154,240 -155,774 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Basic energy sciences............................. 2,127,378 1,685,500 1,653,500 -473,878 -32,000
Advanced scientific computing research............................. 368,820 409,000 399,000 +30,180 -10,000
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 157,110 ............... ............... -157,110 ...............
Fusion energy sciences program..................................... 402,550 421,000 416,000 +13,450 -5,000
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 91,023 ............... ............... -91,023 ...............
Science laboratories infrastructure:
Laboratories facilities support:
Infrastructure support:
Payment in lieu of taxes............................... 1,385 1,385 1,385 ............... ...............
Excess facilities disposal............................. 24,844 ............... ............... -24,844 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.......... 14,301 ............... ............... -14,301 ...............
Oak Ridge landlord..................................... 5,079 5,214 5,214 +135 ...............
General plant projects (emergency appropriations Public 89,572 ............... ............... -89,572 ...............
Law 111-5)............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Infrastructure support..................... 135,181 6,599 6,599 -128,582 ...............
Construction:
10-SC-70 Research support building and infrastructure ............... 8,900 8,900 +8,900 ...............
modernization, SLAC...................................
10-SC-71 Energy sciences building, ANL................. ............... 10,000 10,000 +10,000 ...............
10-SC-72 Renovate science laboratory, Phase II, BNL.... ............... 7,000 7,000 +7,000 ...............
09-SC-72 Seismic life-safety, modernization and 12,495 34,027 34,027 +21,532 ...............
replacement of general purpose buildings Phase 2, PED/
Construction, LBNL....................................
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.......... 15,000 ............... ............... -15,000 ...............
09-SC-73, Interdisciplinary science building Phase 1, 8,240 39,387 39,387 +31,147 ...............
PED, BNL..............................................
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.......... 18,673 ............... ............... -18,673 ...............
09-SC-74, Technology and engineering development 3,700 27,687 27,687 +23,987 ...............
facilities PED, TJNAF.................................
08-SC-71 Modernization of laboratory facilities PED, 25,103 ............... ............... -25,103 ...............
ORNL..................................................
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.......... 60,568 ............... ............... -60,568 ...............
07-SC-05 Physical science facilities, PNNL............. 52,775 ............... ............... -52,775 ...............
03-SC-001 Science laboratories infrastructure:
MEL-001 Multiprogram energy laboratory 11,759 ............... ............... -11,759 ...............
infrastructure projects, various locations........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................. 208,313 127,001 127,001 -81,312 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Science laboratories infrastructure......... 343,494 133,600 133,600 -209,894 ...............
Safeguards and security............................................ 80,603 83,000 83,000 +2,397 ...............
Science program direction:
Headquarters................................................... 75,525 86,606 80,606 +5,081 -6,000
Office of Science and Technical Information.................... 8,916 8,916 8,916 ............... ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 1,600 ............... ............... -1,600 ...............
Field offices.................................................. 102,254 118,200 105,200 +2,946 -13,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Science program direction............................. 188,295 213,722 194,722 +6,427 -19,000
Workforce development for teachers and scientists.................. 13,583 20,678 20,678 +7,095 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 12,500 ............... ............... -12,500 ...............
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy [ARPA-E]................. 15,000 ............... ............... -15,000 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 93,687 ............... 41,150 -52,537 +41,150
Small business innovation research [SBIR]:
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 19,004 ............... ............... -19,004 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, SCIENCE............................................ 6,375,236 4,941,682 4,898,832 -1,476,404 -42,850
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use of prior year balances......................................... -15,000 ............... ............... +15,000 ...............
Unallocated recovery act funding (Emergency appropriation, Public 12,400 ............... ............... -12,400 ...............
Law 111-5)........................................................
====================================================================================
TOTAL, SCIENCE............................................... 6,372,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 -1,473,804 -42,850
Appropriations........................................... (4,772,636) (4,941,682) (4,898,832) (+126,196) (-42,850)
Emergency appropriations................................. (1,600,000) ............... ............... (-1,600,000) ...............
====================================================================================
ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND
Advanced research projects agency--Energy (Emergency appropriation, 398,000 ............... ............... -398,000 ...............
Public Law 111-5).................................................
Program direction.................................................. ............... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 2,000 ............... ............... -2,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND............... 400,000 10,000 ............... -400,000 -10,000
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL
Repository program................................................. 68,552 28,400 28,400 -40,152 ...............
Program direction.................................................. 74,983 70,000 70,000 -4,983 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 1,855 ............... ............... -1,855 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL................................ 145,390 98,400 98,400 -46,990 ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM
Administrative operations.......................................... 19,880 43,000 43,000 +23,120 ...............
Offsetting collection.............................................. -19,880 -43,000 -43,000 -23,120 ...............
Advance appropriation (Public Law 110-161)......................... 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000 ...............
Proposed change in subsidy cost.................................... 440,000 1,500,000 ............... -440,000 -1,500,000
Section 1705 Temporary loan guarantee program:
Direct loan subsidy costs (Emergency appropriations, Public Law 5,965,000 ............... ............... -5,965,000 ...............
111-5)........................................................
Administrative expenses........................................ ............... 17,000 17,000 +17,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 35,000 ............... ............... -35,000 ...............
Administrative expenses, offsetting collections............ ............... -17,000 -17,000 -17,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM. 6,465,000 1,500,000 ............... -6,465,000 -1,500,000
====================================================================================
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM
Direct loan subsidy costs (Emergency appropriations Public Law 110- 7,510,000 ............... ............... -7,510,000 ...............
329)..............................................................
Administrative expenses............................................ ............... 20,000 20,000 +20,000 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM... 7,510,000 20,000 20,000 -7,490,000 ...............
DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION
Administrative operations:
Salaries and expenses:
Office of the Secretary.................................... 5,700 5,864 6,864 +1,164 +1,000
Chief Financial Officer.................................... 43,257 65,981 63,981 +20,724 -2,000
Management................................................. 67,790 88,456 78,456 +10,666 -10,000
Human capital management................................... 31,436 29,537 29,537 -1,899 ...............
Chief Information Officer.................................. 53,738 38,146 38,146 -15,592 ...............
Congressional and intergovernmental affairs................ 4,700 7,326 5,826 +1,126 -1,500
Economic impact and diversity.............................. 3,545 3,896 3,896 +351 ...............
General Counsel............................................ 31,233 32,478 32,478 +1,245 ...............
Policy and international affairs........................... 19,469 19,296 19,296 -173 ...............
Public affairs............................................. 3,780 5,405 4,500 +720 -905
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs................ 1,500 ............... 5,500 +4,000 +5,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Salaries and expenses.......................... 266,148 296,385 288,480 +22,332 -7,905
Program support:
Minority economic impact................................... 855 2,775 2,775 +1,920 ...............
Policy analysis and system studies......................... 1,000 1,159 1,159 +159 ...............
Environmental policy studies............................... 531 528 528 -3 ...............
Climate change technology program (prog. supp)............. 2,000 9,270 9,270 +7,270 ...............
Cybersecurity and secure communications.................... 34,512 33,365 33,365 -1,147 ...............
Corporate management information program................... 27,250 9,403 9,403 -17,847 ...............
Energy information technology services..................... ............... 23,631 23,149 +23,149 -482
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Program support................................ 66,148 80,131 79,649 +13,501 -482
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Administrative operations......................... 332,296 376,516 368,129 +35,833 -8,387
Cost of work for others........................................ 48,537 48,537 48,537 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION........................ 380,833 425,053 416,666 +35,833 -8,387
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funding from other defense activities.............................. -108,190 -122,982 -122,982 -14,792 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Departmental administration (gross)................... 272,643 302,071 293,684 +21,041 -8,387
====================================================================================
Miscellaneous revenues............................................. -117,317 -119,740 -119,740 -2,423 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net)..................... 155,326 182,331 173,944 +18,618 -8,387
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL........................................ 51,927 51,445 51,927 ............... +482
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 15,000 ............... ............... -15,000 ...............
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES:
Life extension program:
B61 Life extension program................................. 2,123 ............... ............... -2,123 ...............
W76 Life extension program................................. 202,920 209,196 209,196 +6,276 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Life extension program............................ 205,043 209,196 209,196 +4,153 ...............
Stockpile systems:
B61 Stockpile systems...................................... 78,021 124,456 124,456 +46,435 ...............
W62 Stockpile systems...................................... 1,596 ............... ............... -1,596 ...............
W76 Stockpile systems...................................... 66,365 65,497 65,497 -868 ...............
W78 Stockpile systems...................................... 42,049 50,741 50,741 +8,692 ...............
W80 Stockpile systems...................................... 31,073 19,064 19,064 -12,009 ...............
B83 Stockpile systems...................................... 24,986 35,682 35,682 +10,696 ...............
W87 Stockpile systems...................................... 36,073 51,817 51,817 +15,744 ...............
W88 Stockpile systems...................................... 48,358 43,043 43,043 -5,315 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Stockpile systems................................. 328,521 390,300 390,300 +61,779 ...............
Reliable replacement warhead................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Weapons dismantlement and disposition:
Operations and maintenance................................. 125,322 84,100 84,100 -41,222 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-32............. 30,000 ............... ............... -30,000 ...............
Construction:
99-D-141 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS.. 64,883 ............... ............... -64,883 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition......... 220,205 84,100 84,100 -136,105 ...............
Stockpile services:
Production support......................................... 293,062 301,484 301,484 +8,422 ...............
Research and development support........................... 35,144 37,071 37,071 +1,927 ...............
Research and development certification and safety.......... 187,574 143,076 173,076 -14,498 +30,000
Management, technology, and production..................... 195,334 200,223 183,223 -12,111 -17,000
Pit manufacturing.......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Pit manufacturing capability............................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Plutonium capability....................................... 155,269 ............... ............... -155,269 ...............
Plutonium infrastructure sustainment....................... ............... 149,201 149,201 +149,201 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Stockpile services............................. 866,383 831,055 844,055 -22,328 +13,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Directed stockpile work........................... 1,620,152 1,514,651 1,527,651 -92,501 +13,000
Campaigns:
Science campaign:
Advanced certification, non-RRW........................ 19,400 19,400 19,400 ............... ...............
Primary assessment technologies........................ 80,181 80,181 83,181 +3,000 +3,000
Dynamic plutonium experiments.......................... 23,022 ............... ............... -23,022 ...............
Dynamic materials properties........................... 83,231 86,617 86,617 +3,386 ...............
Academic alliances..................................... ............... 30,251 30,251 +30,251 ...............
Advanced radiography................................... 28,535 22,328 22,328 -6,207 ...............
Secondary assessment technologies...................... 76,913 77,913 77,913 +1,000 ...............
Test readiness......................................... 5,408 ............... ............... -5,408 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Science campaigns........................ 316,690 316,690 319,690 +3,000 +3,000
Engineering campaign:
Enhanced surety, non-RRW............................... 46,112 42,000 42,000 -4,112 ...............
Weapons system engineering assessment technology....... 16,592 18,000 18,000 +1,408 ...............
Nuclear survivability.................................. 21,100 21,000 21,000 -100 ...............
Enhanced surveillance.................................. 66,196 69,000 69,000 +2,804 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Engineering campaign....................... 150,000 150,000 150,000 ............... ...............
Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield
campaign:
Ignition............................................... 100,535 106,734 106,734 +6,199 ...............
NIF diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support... 66,201 72,252 72,252 +6,051 ...............
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion............... 8,652 5,000 5,000 -3,652 ...............
Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas 3,053 4,000 4,000 +947 ...............
Facility operations and target production.............. 203,282 248,929 265,429 +62,147 +16,500
Inertial fusion technology............................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Naval Research Laboratory.............................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
NIF assembly and installation.......................... 55,192 ............... ............... -55,192 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal............................................. 436,915 436,915 453,415 +16,500 +16,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Inertial confinement fusion................ 436,915 436,915 453,415 +16,500 +16,500
Advanced simulation and computing.......................... 556,125 556,125 566,125 +10,000 +10,000
Readiness campaign:
Stockpile readiness.................................... 27,869 5,746 5,746 -22,123 ...............
High explosives and weapon operations.................. 8,659 4,608 4,608 -4,051 ...............
Nonnuclear readiness................................... 30,000 12,701 12,701 -17,299 ...............
Tritium readiness...................................... 71,831 68,246 68,246 -3,585 ...............
Advanced design and production technologies............ 22,261 8,699 8,699 -13,562 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Readiness campaign......................... 160,620 100,000 100,000 -60,620 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Campaigns..................................... 1,620,350 1,559,730 1,589,230 -31,120 +29,500
Readiness in technical base and facilities [RTBF]:
Operations of facilities:
Operations of facilities............................... ............... 1,342,303 ............... ............... -1,342,303
Kansas City Plant...................................... 89,871 ............... 156,056 +66,185 +156,056
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory................. 82,605 ............... 86,670 +4,065 +86,670
Los Alamos National Laboratory......................... 289,169 ............... 311,776 +22,607 +311,776
Nevada Test Site....................................... 92,203 ............... 79,583 -12,620 +79,583
Pantex................................................. 101,230 ............... 131,602 +30,372 +131,602
Sandia national Laboratory............................. 123,992 ............... 104,133 -19,859 +104,133
Savannah River Site.................................... 92,762 ............... 128,580 +35,818 +128,580
Y-12 Productions Plant................................. 235,397 ............... 210,774 -24,623 +210,774
Institutional Site Support............................. 56,102 ............... 120,129 +64,027 +120,129
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, operations of facilities................... 1,163,331 1,342,303 1,329,303 +165,972 -13,000
Program readiness.......................................... 71,626 73,021 73,021 +1,395 ...............
Material recycle and recovery.............................. 70,334 69,542 69,542 -792 ...............
Containers................................................. 22,696 23,392 23,392 +696 ...............
Storage.................................................... 31,951 24,708 24,708 -7,243 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, RTBF........................................... 1,359,938 1,532,966 1,519,966 +160,028 -13,000
Construction:
10-D-501 Nuclear facilities risk reduction Y-12 ............... 12,500 12,500 +12,500 ...............
National security complex, Oakridge, TN...............
99-D-141 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS.. ............... 30,321 30,321 +30,321 ...............
09-D-007, LANSCE Reinvestment PED Los Alamos National 19,300 ............... 30,000 +10,700 +30,000
Lab, Los Alamos, NM...................................
09-D-404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia 3,104 ............... 13,000 +9,896 +13,000
National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM................
08-D-801 High pressure fire loop [HPFL], Pantex Plant, 1,940 31,910 31,910 +29,970 ...............
Amarillo, TX..........................................
08-D-802 High explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, 27,386 ............... ............... -27,386 ...............
Amarillo, TX..........................................
08-D-804 TA-55 Reinvestment project, Los Alamos 7,663 ............... ............... -7,663 ...............
National Laboratory [LANL]............................
08-D-806 Ion beam laboratory refurbishment, SNL 6,100 ............... ............... -6,100 ...............
Albuquerque, NM.......................................
07-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 7,223 ............... ............... -7,223 ...............
locations.............................................
07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility 19,070 ............... ............... -19,070 ...............
upgrade project, LANL.................................
06-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 101,521 70,678 16,200 -85,321 -54,478
locations.............................................
06-D-141 Project engineering and design [PED], Y-12 ............... ............... 94,000 +94,000 +94,000
National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN..............
06-D-402 NTS replace fire stations 1 & 2 Nevada Test 9,060 1,473 1,473 -7,587 ...............
Site, NV..............................................
05-D-402 Beryllium capability [BEC] project, Y-12 4,865 ............... ............... -4,865 ...............
National security complex, Oak Ridge, TN..............
04-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement 97,194 55,000 98,000 +806 +43,000
project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
NM....................................................
04-D-128 TA-18 mission relocation project, Los Alamos 10,042 1,500 1,500 -8,542 ...............
Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 314,468 203,382 328,904 +14,436 +125,522
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities.... 1,674,406 1,736,348 1,848,870 +174,464 +112,522
Secure transportation asset:
Operations and equipment............................... 127,701 138,772 138,772 +11,071 ...............
Program direction...................................... 86,738 96,143 96,143 +9,405 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Secure transportation asset................ 214,439 234,915 234,915 +20,476 ...............
Nuclear weapons incident response.............................. 215,278 221,936 221,936 +6,658 ...............
Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization pgm: 79,550 144,959 144,959 +65,409 ...............
Construction:
08-D-601 Mercury highway, Nevada Test Site, NV......... 11,349 ............... ............... -11,349 ...............
08-D-602 Portable water system upgrades Y-12 Plant, Oak 26,836 ............... ............... -26,836 ...............
Ridge, TN.............................................
07-D-253 TA 1 heating systems modernization [HSM] 15,282 9,963 9,963 -5,319 ...............
Sandia National Laboratory............................
06-D-601 Electrical distribution system upgrade, Pantex 3,880 ............... ............... -3,880 ...............
Plant, Amarillo, TX...................................
06-D-603 Steam plant life extension project [SLEP], Y- 10,552 ............... ............... -10,552 ...............
12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN..........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................. 67,899 9,963 9,963 -57,936 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Facilities and infrastructure 147,449 154,922 154,922 +7,473 ...............
recapitalization program..........................
Site stewardship:
Environmental projects and operations...................... ............... 41,288 41,288 +41,288 ...............
Nuclear materials integration.............................. ............... 20,000 20,000 +20,000 ...............
Stewardship planning....................................... ............... 29,086 ............... ............... -29,086
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Site stewardship.................................. ............... 90,374 61,288 +61,288 -29,086
Environmental projects and operations:
Long-term stewardship...................................... 38,596 ............... ............... -38,596 ...............
Transformation disposition..................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Safeguards and security:
Cybersecurity.............................................. 121,286 122,511 122,511 +1,225 ...............
Defense nuclear security................................... 689,510 700,044 700,044 +10,534 ...............
Construction:
10-D-701 Security improvements project Y-12 Plant, ............... 49,000 49,000 +49,000 ...............
Oak Ridge, TN.....................................
08-D-701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los 44,620 ............... ............... -44,620 ...............
Almos National Laboratory.........................
05-D-170 Project engineering and design [PED], 1,078 ............... ............... -1,078 ...............
various locations.................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction........................... 45,698 49,000 49,000 +3,302 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense nuclear security............... 735,208 749,044 749,044 +13,836 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Safeguards and security................... 856,494 871,555 871,555 +15,061 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.............................. 22,836 ............... ............... -22,836 ...............
Use of prior year balances..................................... ............... ............... -42,100 -42,100 -42,100
====================================================================================
TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.................................... 6,410,000 6,384,431 6,468,267 +58,267 +83,836
====================================================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
Nonproliferation and verification, R&D............................. 345,332 297,300 337,300 -8,032 +40,000
Construction:
07-SC-05 Physical Science Facility, Pacific Northwest 18,460 ............... ............... -18,460 ...............
National Laboratory, Richland, WA.........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nonproliferation & verification R&D............ 363,792 297,300 337,300 -26,492 +40,000
Nonproliferation and international security........................ 150,000 207,202 187,202 +37,202 -20,000
International nuclear materials protection and cooperation 400,000 552,300 552,300 +152,300 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-32..................... 55,000 ............... ............... -55,000 ...............
Elimination of weapons-grade plutonium production program.......... 141,299 24,507 24,507 -116,792 ...............
Fissile materials disposition:
U.S. plutonium disposition..................................... 40,774 90,896 90,896 +50,122 ...............
U.S. uranium disposition....................................... ............... 34,691 34,691 +34,691 ...............
Supporting activities.......................................... ............... 1,075 1,075 +1,075 ...............
Construction:
MOX fuel fabrication facilities:
99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, ............... 504,238 504,238 +504,238 ...............
Savannah River, SC....................................
99-D-141-02 Waste solidification building, Savannah ............... 70,000 70,000 +70,000 ...............
River, SC.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... ............... 574,238 574,238 +574,238 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposal.... 40,774 700,900 700,900 +660,126 ...............
Russian surplus materials disposition.......................... 1,000 1,000 1,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Fissile materials disposition......................... 41,774 701,900 701,900 +660,126 ...............
Global threat reduction initiative................................. 395,000 353,500 333,500 -61,500 -20,000
International nuclear fuel bank.................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 1,903 ............... ............... -1,903 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................... 1,548,768 2,136,709 2,136,709 +587,941 ...............
Use of prior year balances......................................... -11,418 ............... ............... +11,418 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................... 1,537,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 +599,359 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION...................... 1,537,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 +599,359 ...............
====================================================================================
NAVAL REACTORS
Naval reactors development......................................... 771,600 935,533 905,533 +133,933 -30,000
Construction:
10-D-093, Security upgrades, KAPL.............................. ............... 1,500 1,500 +1,500 ...............
10-D-904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho................... ............... 700 700 +700 ...............
09-D-190, PED, Infrastructure upgrades, KAPL................... 1,000 1,000 1,000 ............... ...............
09-D-902, NRF Office Building #2, ECC upgrade, Idaho........... 8,300 6,400 6,400 -1,900 ...............
08-D-190 Project engineering and design, Expended Core Facility 300 9,500 9,500 +9,200 ...............
M-290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID
07-D-190 Materials research technology complex [MRTC].......... 12,400 11,700 11,700 -700 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction....................................... 22,000 30,800 30,800 +8,800 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Naval reactors development............................ 793,600 966,333 936,333 +142,733 -30,000
Program direction.................................................. 34,454 36,800 36,800 +2,346 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS........................................ 828,054 1,003,133 973,133 +145,079 -30,000
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
Office of the Administrator........................................ 415,878 431,074 431,074 +15,196 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 23,312 ............... ............... -23,312 ...............
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -10,320 -10,320 -10,320 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR........................... 439,190 420,754 420,754 -18,436 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.............. 9,214,594 9,945,027 9,998,863 +784,269 +53,836
====================================================================================
DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Closure Sites:
Closure sites administration................................... 13,209 8,225 8,225 -4,984 ...............
Fernald........................................................ 2,100 ............... ............... -2,100 ...............
Miamisburg..................................................... 30,574 33,243 33,243 +2,669 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 19,700 ............... ............... -19,700 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, closure sites..................................... 65,583 41,468 41,468 -24,115 ...............
Hanford Site:
Nuclear facility D&D, river corridor closure project........... 231,837 327,955 327,955 +96,118 ...............
Nuclear material stabilization & disposition PFP............... 122,483 118,087 118,087 -4,396 ...............
SNF stabilization and disposition.............................. 122,171 55,325 95,325 -26,846 +40,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions....................... 476,491 501,367 541,367 +64,876 +40,000
Nuclear facility D&D--remainder of Hanford..................... 89,903 70,250 70,250 -19,653 ...............
Richland community and regulatory support...................... 19,620 21,940 21,940 +2,320 ...............
Soil & water remediation--groundwater/vadose zone.............. 182,532 176,766 229,766 +47,234 +53,000
Solid waste stabilization & disposition--200 area.............. 198,430 132,757 159,757 -38,673 +27,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions....................... 490,485 401,713 481,713 -8,772 +80,000
Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111-5:
D&D river corridor......................................... 442,265 ............... ............... -442,265 ...............
D&D remainder of Handford.................................. 740,120 ............... ............... -740,120 ...............
Soil and groundwater RL-100................................ 145,780 ............... ............... -145,780 ...............
Soil and groundwater RL-1041............................... 77,815 ............... ............... -77,815 ...............
TRU and solid waste........................................ 228,520 ............... ............... -228,520 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Hanford Site...................................... 2,601,476 903,080 1,023,080 -1,578,396 +120,000
Idaho National Laboratory:
SNF stabilization and disposition--2012........................ 14,334 14,768 28,768 +14,434 +14,000
Solid waste stabilization and disposition...................... 191,237 137,000 137,000 -54,237 ...............
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition.... 46,025 95,800 132,800 +86,775 +37,000
06-D-401, Sodium bearing waste treatment project, ID........... 86,700 83,700 83,700 -3,000 ...............
Soil and water remediation--2012............................... 99,465 71,000 84,000 -15,465 +13,000
Nuclear facility D&D........................................... 34,133 ............... ............... -34,133 ...............
Idaho community and regulatory support......................... 3,867 3,900 3,900 +33 ...............
D&D (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5)............ 217,875 ............... ............... -217,875 ...............
TRU and solid waste (emergency appropriation, Public Law 130,000 ............... ............... -130,000 ...............
111-5)....................................................
Soil and groundwater (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 120,000 ............... ............... -120,000 ...............
111-5)....................................................
Total, Idaho National Laboratory......................... 943,636 406,168 470,168 -473,468 +64,000
NNSA:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory......................... ............... 910 910 +910 ...............
NNSA Service Center/SPRU....................................... 19,443 17,938 17,938 -1,505 ...............
Nevada......................................................... 75,674 65,674 65,674 -10,000 ...............
Nevada soil and groundwater (Emergency appropriation Public Law 44,325 ............... ............... -44,325 ...............
111-5)........................................................
California site support........................................ ............... 238 238 +238 ...............
Sandia National Laboratories................................... 3,000 2,864 2,864 -136 ...............
Los Alamos National Laboratory................................. 222,734 189,000 204,000 -18,734 +15,000
D&D acceleration (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5)... 118,200 ............... ............... -118,200 ...............
Soil and groundwater (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111- 78,800 ............... ............... -78,800 ...............
5)............................................................
SPRU recovery acct project (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 31,775 ............... ............... -31,775 ...............
111-5)........................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites....................... 593,951 276,624 291,624 -302,327 +15,000
Oak Ridge Reservation:
Building 3019.................................................. 58,000 38,900 38,900 -19,100 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D ORNL...................................... 64,825 38,900 38,900 -25,925 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D Y-12...................................... 48,392 34,000 34,000 -14,392 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D, E. Tenn. Technology Park................. 105 100 100 -5 ...............
OR reservation community & regulatory support.................. 6,100 6,253 6,253 +153 ...............
Soil and water remediation--offsites........................... 1,230 ............... ............... -1,230 ...............
Solid waste stabilization and disposition--2012................ 84,183 35,615 35,615 -48,568 ...............
Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111-5:
D&D Y-12 footprint reduction............................... 327,000 ............... ............... -327,000 ...............
D7D ORNL footprint reduction............................... 151,110 ............... ............... -151,110 ...............
TRU and solid waste........................................ 80,000 ............... ............... -80,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation............................. 820,945 153,768 153,768 -667,177 ...............
Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment & immobilization plant:
01-D-16A Low activity waste facility....................... 160,000 100,000 100,000 -60,000 ...............
01-D-16B Analytical laboratory............................. 65,000 55,000 55,000 -10,000 ...............
01-D-16C Balance of facilities............................. 75,000 50,000 50,000 -25,000 ...............
01-D-16D High-level waste facility......................... 125,000 160,000 160,000 +35,000 ...............
01-D-16E Pretreatment facility............................. 265,000 325,000 325,000 +60,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Waste treatment and immobilization plant....... 690,000 690,000 690,000 ............... ...............
Tank Farm activities:
Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition.............. 319,943 408,000 408,000 +88,057 ...............
Tank infrastructure (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 326,035 ............... ............... -326,035 ...............
111-5)....................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tank Farm activities........................... 645,978 408,000 408,000 -237,978 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of River Protection........................ 1,335,978 1,098,000 1,098,000 -237,978 ...............
Savannah River site:
Nuclear material stabilization and disposition:
Nuclear material stabilization and disposition............. ............... 385,310 385,310 +385,310 ...............
Construction:
08-D-414 Project engineering and design plutonium ............... 6,315 6,315 +6,315 ...............
preparation facility, VL..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions............... ............... 391,625 391,625 +391,625 ...............
SR community and regulatory support............................ 14,800 18,300 18,300 +3,500 ...............
Nuclear material stabilization and disposition................. 339,843 ............... ............... -339,843 ...............
Spent nuclear fuel stabilization and disposition............... 24,108 38,768 38,768 +14,660 ...............
Solid waste stabilization and disposition...................... 62,599 ............... ............... -62,599 ...............
Soil and water remediation..................................... 71,967 ............... 33,025 -38,942 +33,025
Nuclear facility D&D........................................... 12,052 ............... ............... -12,052 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions....................... 525,369 57,068 90,093 -435,276 +33,025
Tank Farm activities:
Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition.............. 546,250 527,138 527,138 -19,112 ...............
05-D-405, Salt waste processing facility................... 155,524 234,118 234,118 +78,594 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tank farm activities........................... 701,774 761,256 761,256 +59,482 ...............
Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111-5:
D&D P and R area........................................... 579,000 ............... ............... -579,000 ...............
D&D M and D area........................................... 130,000 ............... ............... -130,000 ...............
D&D soil and groundwater sitewide.......................... 365,400 ............... ............... -365,400 ...............
TRU and solid waste........................................ 541,000 ............... ............... -541,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Savannah River site............................... 2,842,543 1,209,949 1,242,974 -1,599,569 +33,025
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant:
Operate WIPP................................................... 137,425 144,902 159,902 +22,477 +15,000
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.................. 172,375 ............... ............... -172,375 ...............
Central Characterization Project............................... 38,206 13,730 13,730 -24,476 ...............
Transportation................................................. 28,170 33,851 33,851 +5,681 ...............
Community and regulatory support............................... 27,860 27,854 27,854 -6 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant........................... 404,036 220,337 235,337 -168,699 +15,000
Program direction.................................................. 309,807 355,000 355,000 +45,193 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5...................... 25,635 ............... ............... -25,635 ...............
Program support.................................................... 33,930 34,000 34,000 +70 ...............
Safeguards and Security:
Waste Isolation Pilot Project.................................. 5,124 4,644 4,644 -480 ...............
Oak Ridge Reservation.......................................... 27,020 32,400 32,400 +5,380 ...............
West Valley.................................................... 1,400 1,859 1,859 +459 ...............
Paducah........................................................ 8,196 8,190 8,190 -6 ...............
Richland/Hanford Site.......................................... 79,765 82,771 82,771 +3,006 ...............
Savannah River Site............................................ 134,336 132,064 149,064 +14,728 +17,000
Portsmouth..................................................... 4,500 17,509 17,509 +13,009 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Safeguards and Security............................... 260,341 279,437 296,437 +36,096 +17,000
Technology development............................................. 32,320 55,000 55,000 +22,680 ...............
Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution........................... 463,000 463,000 463,000 ............... ...............
ARRA defense unallocated (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111- 34,270 ............... ............... -34,270 ...............
5)................................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP..................... 10,767,451 5,495,831 5,759,856 -5,007,595 +264,025
====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 17,908 ............... 4,000 -13,908 +4,000
Use of prior year balances......................................... -1,109 ............... ............... +1,109 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP........................ 10,784,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 -5,020,394 +268,025
Appropriations........................................... (5,657,250) (5,495,831) (5,763,856) (+106,606) (+268,025)
Emergency appropriations................................. (5,127,000) ............... ............... (-5,127,000) ...............
====================================================================================
OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Health, safety and security:
Health, safety and security.................................... 346,874 337,757 337,757 -9,117 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 99,597 112,125 112,125 +12,528 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Health, safety and security........................... 446,471 449,882 449,882 +3,411 ...............
Office of Legacy Management:
Legacy management.............................................. 174,397 177,618 177,618 +3,221 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 11,584 12,184 12,184 +600 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of Legacy Management........................... 185,981 189,802 189,802 +3,821 ...............
Nuclear energy:
Infrastructure:
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security..................... 78,811 ............... ............... -78,811 ...............
INL infrastructure O&M..................................... ............... 83,358 83,358 +83,358 ...............
Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility:
Operations and maintenance................................. 19,200 ............... ............... -19,200 ...............
Construction and other project costs:
99-D-143 MOX fuel fabrication facility................. 467,808 ............... ............... -467,808 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility...... 487,008 ............... ............... -487,008 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear energy................................ 565,819 83,358 83,358 -482,461 ...............
Defense-related administrative support............................. 108,190 122,982 122,982 +14,792 ...............
Office of Hearings and Appeals..................................... 6,603 6,444 6,444 -159 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other Defense Activities........................... 1,313,064 852,468 852,468 -460,596 ...............
====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 999 ............... 2,000 +1,001 +2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.............................. 1,314,063 852,468 854,468 -459,595 +2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL..................................... 143,000 98,400 98,400 -44,600 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES...................... 21,455,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 -4,740,320 +323,861
Appropriations........................................... (16,243,907) (16,391,726) (16,715,587) (+471,680) (+323,861)
Emergency appropriations................................. (5,212,000) ............... ............... (-5,212,000) ...............
====================================================================================
POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and maintenance:
Purchase power and wheeling.................................... 63,522 85,228 85,228 +21,706 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 7,420 7,638 7,638 +218 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance.......................... 70,942 92,866 92,866 +21,924 ...............
Less alternative financing [PPW]............................... -14,002 -14,422 -14,422 -420 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -49,520 -78,444 -78,444 -28,924 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. ............... 7,638 7,638 +7,638 ...............
Spending in excess of receipts (proposal)...................... ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 7,420 8,638 8,638 +1,218 ...............
====================================================================================
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and maintenance:
Operating expenses............................................. 12,865 12,775 12,775 -90 ...............
Purchase power and wheeling.................................... 46,000 48,000 48,000 +2,000 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 24,330 28,153 28,153 +3,823 ...............
Construction................................................... 5,991 6,016 6,016 +25 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance.......................... 89,186 94,944 94,944 +5,758 ...............
Less alternative financing (for program direction)............. -2,200 ............... ............... +2,200 ...............
Less alternative financing (ofr O&M)........................... -9,381 ............... ............... +9,381 ...............
Less alternative financing [PPW]............................... -11,000 ............... ............... +11,000 ...............
Less alternative financing (Const.)............................ -3,191 ............... ............... +3,191 ...............
Less alternative financing..................................... ............... -12,000 -12,000 -12,000 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -35,000 -69,868 -69,868 -34,868 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. ............... 31,868 31,868 +31,868 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 28,414 44,944 44,944 +16,530 ...............
====================================================================================
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and maintenance:
Construction and rehabilitation............................ 74,544 104,971 104,971 +30,427 ...............
Operation and maintenance.................................. 52,365 57,159 57,159 +4,794 ...............
Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111-5.............. 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 600,960 548,847 548,847 -52,113 ...............
Program direction.......................................... 166,423 180,756 180,756 +14,333 ...............
Utah mitigation and conservation........................... 7,342 7,584 7,584 +242 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 911,634 899,317 899,317 -12,317 ...............
Less alternative financing (for O&M)........................... -15,499 ............... ............... +15,499 ...............
Less alternative financing (for Const.)........................ -47,663 ............... ............... +47,663 ...............
Less alternative financing (for Program direction)............. -15,800 ............... ............... +15,800 ...............
Less alternative financing (for PPW)........................... -197,842 ............... ............... +197,842 ...............
Less alternative financing..................................... ............... -288,920 -288,920 -288,920 ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 108-477, Public Law 109-103) -403,118 -349,807 -349,807 +53,311 ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 98-381)..................... -3,366 -3,879 -3,879 -513 ...............
Offsetting collections (for program direction)................. ............... -110,492 -110,492 -110,492 ...............
Offsetting collections (for O&M)............................... ............... -37,038 -37,038 -37,038 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. ............... 147,530 147,530 +147,530 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 228,346 256,711 256,711 +28,365 ...............
====================================================================================
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
Operation and maintenance.......................................... 2,959 2,568 2,568 -391 ...............
Offsetting collections............................................. ............... -2,348 -2,348 -2,348 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.................. ............... 2,348 2,348 +2,348 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS....................... 267,139 312,861 312,861 +45,722 ...............
====================================================================================
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission............................... 273,400 298,000 298,000 +24,600 ...............
FERC revenues...................................................... -273,400 -298,000 -298,000 -24,600 ...............
====================================================================================
GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY............................ 73,537,001 28,407,846 27,398,221 -46,138,780 -1,009,625
(Total amount appropriated).............................. (26,793,001) (28,407,846) (27,398,221) (+605,220) (-1,009,625)
(Emergency appropriations)............................... (46,570,000) ............... ............... (-46,570,000) ...............
(Rescissions, including emergency funding)............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
(Deferrals).............................................. (149,000) ............... ............... (-149,000) ...............
(Advance appropriation).................................. (25,000) ............... ............... (-25,000) ...............
====================================================================================
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS
Energy efficiency and renewable energy............................. 18,978,540 2,318,602 2,232,967 -16,745,573 -85,635
Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................ 4,637,000 208,008 179,483 -4,457,517 -28,525
Nuclear energy..................................................... 792,000 761,274 761,274 -30,726 ...............
Fossil Energy Research and Development............................. 4,276,320 617,565 700,200 -3,576,120 +82,635
Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves............................... 19,099 23,627 23,627 +4,528 ...............
Strategic petroleum reserves....................................... 205,000 229,073 259,073 +54,073 +30,000
Northeast home heating oil reserve................................. 9,800 11,300 11,300 +1,500 ...............
Energy Information Administration.................................. 110,595 133,058 110,595 ............... -22,463
Non-defense environmental clean up................................. 744,819 237,517 259,829 -484,990 +22,312
Uranium enrichment D&D fund........................................ 925,503 359,377 588,322 -337,181 +228,945
Science............................................................ 6,372,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 -1,473,804 -42,850
Energy transformation acceleration fund............................ 400,000 10,000 ............... -400,000 -10,000
Nuclear waste disposal............................................. 145,390 98,400 98,400 -46,990 ...............
Innovative technology loan guarantee program....................... 6,465,000 1,500,000 ............... -6,465,000 -1,500,000
Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loan pgm................ 7,510,000 20,000 20,000 -7,490,000 ...............
Departmental administration........................................ 272,643 302,071 293,684 +21,041 -8,387
Revenues....................................................... -117,317 -119,740 -119,740 -2,423 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Departmental administration........................... 155,326 182,331 173,944 +18,618 -8,387
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 66,927 51,445 51,927 -15,000 +482
Atomic energy defense activities:
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons activities......................................... 6,410,000 6,384,431 6,468,267 +58,267 +83,836
Defense nuclear nonproliferation........................... 1,537,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 +599,359 ...............
Naval reactors............................................. 828,054 1,003,133 973,133 +145,079 -30,000
Office of the Administrator................................ 439,190 420,754 420,754 -18,436 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration....... 9,214,594 9,945,027 9,998,863 +784,269 +53,836
Defense environmental cleanup.................................. 10,784,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 -5,020,394 +268,025
Other defense activities....................................... 1,314,063 852,468 854,468 -459,595 +2,000
Defense nuclear waste disposal................................. 143,000 98,400 98,400 -44,600 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Atomic energy defense activities...................... 21,455,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 -4,740,320 +323,861
Power marketing administrations:
Southeastern Power Administration.............................. 7,420 8,638 8,638 +1,218 ...............
Southwestern Power Administration.............................. 28,414 44,944 44,944 +16,530 ...............
Western Area Power Administration.............................. 228,346 256,711 256,711 +28,365 ...............
Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund.............. 2,959 2,568 2,568 -391 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Power marketing administrations....................... 267,139 312,861 312,861 +45,722 ...............
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses.......................................... 273,400 298,000 298,000 +24,600 ...............
Revenues....................................................... -273,400 -298,000 -298,000 -24,600 ...............
====================================================================================
Total Summary of Accounts, Department of Energy.............. 73,537,001 28,407,846 27,398,221 -46,138,780 -1,009,625
====================================================================================
FUNCTION RECAP:
NON-DEFENSE.................................................... 52,166,094 12,016,120 10,682,634 -41,483,460 -1,333,486
DEFENSE........................................................ 21,370,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 -4,655,320 +323,861
Environmental management........................................... (12,454,572) (6,092,725) (6,612,007) (-5,842,565) (+519,282)
DEFENSE RELATED................................................ (10,784,250) (5,495,831) (5,763,856) (-5,020,394) (+268,025)
NON-DEFENSE.................................................... (1,670,322) (596,894) (848,151) (-822,171) (+251,257)
Nuclear waste disposal............................................. (288,390) (196,800) (196,800) (-91,590) ...............
DEFENSE RELATED................................................ (143,000) (98,400) (98,400) (-44,600) ...............
NON-DEFENSE.................................................... (145,390) (98,400) (98,400) (-46,990) ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
The following list of general provisions is recommended by
the Committee. The recommendation includes several provisions
which have been included in previous Energy and Water
Appropriations Acts and new provisions as follows:
Section 301. Language is included under section 302, which
prohibits the use of funds in this act to initiate a request
for proposal of expression of interest for new programs which
have not yet been presented to Congress in the annual budget
submission and which have not yet been approved and funded by
Congress.
Section 302. Language is included to address issues under
section 3161 of Public Law 102-484.
Section 303. Language is included which permits the
transfer and merger of unexpended balances of prior
appropriations with appropriation accounts established in this
bill.
Section 304. Language is included that prohibits the use of
funds by the Bonneville Power Administration to enter into
energy efficiency contracts outside its service area.
Section 305. This section establishes certain notice and
competition requirements for Department of Energy user
facilities.
Section 306. Language is included specifically authorizing
intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year
2008 Intelligence Authorization Act.
Section 307. Language included related to laboratory
directed research and development.
Section 308. Language is included regarding transfer
authority.
Section 309. The Committee has included a provision related
to the Bonneville Power Administration Treasury account.
Section 310. The Committee has included a provision related
to notification of funding awards.
Section 311. The Committee has included a provision related
to pensions.
TITLE IV
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $75,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 76,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 76,000,000
Established in 1965, the Appalachian Regional Commission is
an economic development agency composed of 13 Appalachian
States and a Federal co-chair appointed by the President. For
fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $76,000,000 for the
ARC.
The Committee recognizes the importance of trade and
investment opportunities to the Appalachian Region and is
encouraged by the findings in a report that Appalachian firms
could find significant trade and investment opportunities,
particularly in the energy, high technology, and transportation
sectors in the Republic of Turkey and the surrounding region.
In this regard, the Committee supports the Appalachian-Turkish
Trade Project [ATTP], a project to promote opportunities to
expand trade, encourage business interests, stimulate foreign
studies, and to build a lasting and mutually meaningful
relationship between Appalachian States and the Republic of
Turkey, as well as the neighboring regions, such as Greece. The
Committee commends the ARC for its leadership role in helping
to implement the mission of the ATTP. The Committee expects the
ARC to continue to be a prominent ATTP sponsor.
The Committee has included no earmarks in the ARC funds.
The Commission allocates its funds by formula to its member
States, based primarily on need. Under the Commission's formula
system, earmarks out of ARC's base funding could come at the
expense of those States that have no earmarks. Accordingly, the
Committee directs that any earmarks in any State be taken from
within that State's regular ARC allocation.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $25,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 26,086,000
Committee recommendation................................ 26,086,000
For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $26,086,000,
the same as the President's request, for the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board [DNFSB]. This Board is responsible for
evaluating the implementation of standards for design,
construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department
of Energy's defense nuclear facilities. Based on these
evaluations, the Board makes specific recommendations to the
Secretary of Energy to ensure that both public and employee
heath and safety are protected. The Committee encourages the
DNFSB to undertake the responsibility to provide cost estimates
to accompany their recommendations.
Delta Regional Authority
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $13,000,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 13,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 13,000,000
For the Delta Regional Authority, the Committee recommends
$13,000,000. The Delta Regional Authority was established to
assist the eight State Mississippi Delta Region in obtaining
basic infrastructure, transportation, skills training, and
opportunities for economic development.
Denali Commission
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $11,800,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 11,965,000
Committee recommendation................................ 11,965,000
The Denali Commission is a Federal-State partnership
responsible for promoting infrastructure development, job
training, and other economic development services in rural
areas throughout Alaska. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee
recommends $11,965,000.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $1,034,656,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 1,061,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,061,000,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... -$860,857,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... -878,102,000
Committee recommendation................................ -902,402,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $173,799,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 182,898,000
Committee recommendation................................ 158,598,000
The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission for fiscal year 2010 is $1,061,000,000. This amount
is offset by estimated revenues of $902,402,000 resulting in a
net appropriation of $158,598,000. The Committee has provided
$15,000,000 to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support its
participation in an Integrated University Program as directed
by section 313 of Public Law 111-8. The Committee recommends
$10,000,000 of this amount to be used to support university
education programs relevant to the NRC mission. In addition,
not less than $5,000,000 of this amount will be used for grants
to support research projects that do not align with
programmatic missions but are critical to maintaining the
discipline of nuclear science and engineering. The Committee
expects the Commission to utilize a portion of existing
carryover balances to support license application reviews of
any new reactor designs, including modular reactors.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $10,860,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 10,102,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,860,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2009.................................... -$9,774,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... -9,092,000
Committee recommendation................................ -9,774,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $1,086,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 1,010,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,086,000
The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $1,086,000,
an increase of $76,000 over the budget request. The Committee
recommends that the current no year funding authority of the
Office of Inspector General be retained.
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Appropriations, 2009.................................... $3,811,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 3,891,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,891,000
The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established to
evaluate the scientific and technical validity of the
Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal program. The
Board reports its findings no fewer than two times a year to
Congress and to the Secretary of Energy. For fiscal year 2010,
the Committee recommends $3,891,000.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation
Projects
Appropriation, 2009..................................... $4,400,000
Budget estimate, 2010................................... 4,466,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,466,000
The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural
Gas Transportation Projects was established as an independent
agency in the executive branch on December 13, 2006, pursuant
to the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 2004. The Committee
recommends $4,466,000, the same as the budget request.
Tennessee Valley Authority
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2009....................................................
Budget estimate, 2010................................... $19,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................
OFFSET FROM TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND
Appropriations, 2009....................................................
Budget estimate, 2010................................... -$19,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................
The Committee recommendation does not include the
administration's proposal to establish a congressionally funded
Office of the Inspector General to oversee the Tennessee Valley
Authority. In recent years, the TVA has funded the requests of
the TVA-IG office out of power revenues and receipts. This
process has worked well, and the Committee sees no compelling
reason to change that mechanism for funding the TVA-IG.
General Provision--Independent Agencies
The following general provision is recommended by the
Committee.
Section 401. The provision addresses an issue with the
Delta Regional Authority.
TITLE V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following list of general provisions are recommended by
the Committee.
Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds
provided in this bill from being used to influence
congressional action.
Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority
under this act.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee recommends funding for the following programs
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal
year 2010:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: General Investigations;
Construction, General; Mississippi River and Tributaries;
Operations and Maintenance; Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial
Action Program;
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation;
Water and Related Resources;
Department of Energy: Energy Conservation and Supply
Activities:
Office of Fossil Energy: Fossil Energy R&D, Clean Coal,
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Research;
Health, Safety and Security;
Non-Defense Environmental Management;
Office of Science;
Department of Administration;
National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons
Activities; Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; Naval Reactors;
Office of the Administrator;
Defense Environmental Management, Defense Site Acceleration
Completion;
Other Defense Activities;
Defense Nuclear Waste Fund;
Office of Security and Performance Assurance;
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
Power Marketing Administrations: Southeastern,
Southwestern, Western Area; and
Energy Information Administration.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 9, 2009,
the Committee ordered reported an original bill (S. 1436)
making appropriations for the energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010,
subject to amendment and consistent with the budget allocation,
and authorized the chairman of the committee or the chairman of
the subcommittee to offer the text of the Senate-reported bill
as a committee amendment in the nature of a substitute to the
House companion measure, by a recorded vote of 30-0, a quorum
being present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Inouye
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray
Mr. Dorgan
Mrs. Feinstein
Mr. Durbin
Mr. Johnson
Ms. Landrieu
Mr. Reed
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Nelson
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Specter
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Bond
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mrs. Hutchison
Mr. Brownback
Mr. Alexander
Ms. Collins
Mr. Voinovich
Ms. Murkowski
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the Committee.''
In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is
proposed is shown in roman.
FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM ACT OF 2000, PUBLIC LAW 106-
382
SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) Assiniboine and Sioux Rural Water System.--There are
authorized to be appropriated--
(1) to the Bureau of Reclamation [over a period of
10 fiscal years] through fiscal year 2015, $124,000,000
for the planning, design, and construction of the
Assiniboine and Sioux Rural Water System; and
(2) to the Bureau of Indian Affairs such sums as
are necessary for the operation and maintenance of the
Assiniboine and Sioux Rural Water System.
(b) Dry Prairie Rural Water System.--There is authorized to
be appropriated, [over a period of 10 fiscal years] through
fiscal year 2015, $51,000,000 for the planning, design, and
construction of the Dry Prairie Rural Water System.
------
CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001, PUBLIC LAW 106-554
APPENDIX D--H.R. 5666
TITLE V--LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER REGION
SEC. 501. SHORT TITLE.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 503. DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY.
The Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7
U.S.C.1921 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``Subtitle F--Delta Regional Authority
``SEC. 382A. DEFINITIONS.
* * * * * * *
``SEC. 382B. DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY.
``(a)
* * * * * * *
``(c) Voting.--
[``(1) In general.--A decision by the Authority
shall require a majority vote of the Authority (not
including any member representing a State that is
delinquent under subsection (g)(2)(C)) to be
effective.]
(1) In general--voting.--A decision by the
Authority shall require the affirmative vote of the
Federal cochairperson and a majority of the State
members (not including any member representing a State
that is delinquent under subsection (g)(2)(C)) to be
effective.
------
FARM SECURITY AND RURAL INVESTMENT ACT OF 2002, PUBLIC LAW 107-171
SEC. 2507. DESERT TERMINAL LAKES.
(a) * * *
(1) be used by the Secretary of the Interior,
acting throughthe Commissioner of Reclamation, to
provide water to at-risk natural desert terminal lakes;
[or]
(2) remain available until expended[.] ; and
(3) for efforts consistent with researching,
supporting, and conserving fish, wildlife, plant, and
habitat resources in the Walker River Basin.
------
CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION, 2003, PUBLIC LAW 108-7
Sec. 122. The non-Federal sponsor shall receive credit in
an amount not to exceed [$10,000,000] $27,000,000 toward their
share of the cost of Des Moines Recreational River and
Greenbelt, Iowa, projects for work performed by the sponsor, or
others on behalf of the sponsor, including planning, design,
and construction performed after October 1, 2002, provided the
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers,
determines that such work is completed in accordance with
United States Army Corps of Engineers standards and procedures
and is integral to the Des Moines Recreational River and
Greenbelt project.
------
WATER SUPPLY, RELIABILITY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ACT, PUBLIC
LAW 108-361
TITLE I--CALIFORNIA WATER SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 103. BAY DELTA PROGRAM.
(a) * * *
* * * * * * *
(e) New and Expanded Authorizations for Federal Agencies.--
(1) In general.--The heads of the Federal agencies
described in this subsection are authorized to carry
out the activities described in subsection (f) during
each of fiscal years 2005 through [2010] 2015, in
coordination with the Governor.
* * * * * * *
(f) Description of Activities Under New and Expanded
Authorizations.--
(1) * * *
* * * * * * *
(3) * * *
(A) * * *
(B) Report.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the
appropriate authorizing and appropriating
committees of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report that describes the
levee stability reconstruction projects and
priorities that will be carried out under this
title during each of fiscal years 2005 through
[2010] 2015.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 107. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS.
(a) In General.--The Federal share of the cost of
implementing the Calfed Bay-Delta Program for fiscal years 2005
through [2010] 2015 in the aggregate, as set forth in the
Record of Decision, shall not exceed 33.3 percent.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 109. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary
and the heads of the Federal agencies to pay the Federal share
of the cost of carrying out the new and expanded authorities
described in subsections (e) and (f) of section 103
$389,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2005 through [2010]
2015, to remain available until expended.
------
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006, PUBLIC LAW 109-
103
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
General Provisions, Department of the Interior
Sec. 208. (a)(1) Using amounts made available under section
2507 of the Farm and Security Rural Investment Act of 2002 (43
U.S.C. 2211 note; Public Law 107-171), the Secretary shall
provide [not more than] $70,000,000 to the University of Nevada
or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. The Secretary may
provide funds to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in
advance without regard to when exenses are incurred. The funds
shall be subject to the provisions of the National Wildlife
Foundation Establishment Act, excluding subsection (a) of
section 10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 3709(a))--
(A) to acquire from willing sellers land, water
appurtenant to the land, and related interests in the
Walker River Basin[, Nevada; and] ; and
(B) to establish and administer an agricultural and
natural resources center, the mission of which shall be
to undertake research, restoration, and educational
activities in the Walker River Basin relating to--
(i) innovative agricultural water
conservation;
(ii) cooperative programs for environmental
restoration;
(iii) fish and wildlife habitat
restoration; and
(iv) wild horse and burro research and
adoption marketing[.] and
(C) to design and implement conservation and
stewardship measures to address impacts from activities
carried out--
(i) under subparagraph (A); and
(ii) in conjunction with willing
landowners.
(2) In acquiring interests under paragraph (1)(A), the
University of Nevada shall make acquisitions that [the
University determines are the most beneficial to--] the
University of Nevada or the National Wildlife Foundation shall
make acqusitions that the University or the Foundation
determines to be the most beneficial to--
------
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007, PUBLIC LAW 110-114
TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.
The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek,
Lincoln, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is
modified--
(1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of
1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share
of the cost of the project the cost of design and
construction work carried out by the non-Federal
interest for the project before, on and after the date
of the partnership agreement for the project; and
(2) * * *
* * * * * * *
TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS
SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND
WYOMING.
* * * * * * *
(1) * * *
* * * * * * *
(3) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the
following:
``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period
beginning with fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural Nevada,
[$25,000,000 for each of Montana and New Mexico] $75,000,000
for Montana, $25,000,000 for New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho,
[$50,000,000] $100,000,000 for rural Utah, and $30,000,000 for
Wyoming. Such sums shall remain available until expended.''.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI.
Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999
(113 Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking
``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$200,000,000''.
------
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations
to its subcommittees of amounts in the Budget Resolution
for 2010: Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development:
Mandatory............................................... ........... ........... ........... ...........
Discretionary........................................... 33,750 33,750 43,201 \1\43,201
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2010.................................................... ........... ........... ........... \2\19,820
2011.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 9,270
2012.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 3,004
2013.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 607
2014 and future years................................... ........... ........... ........... 804
Financial assistance to State and local governments for NA 93 NA 19
2010.......................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the
purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should
make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money.
As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the
Senate, the term ``congressional directed spending item'' means
a provision or report language included primarily at the
request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit
authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan,
loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure
with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality
or congressional district, other than through a statutory or
administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process.
For each item, a Member is required to provide a
certification that neither the Member nor the Senator's
immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such
congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are
available to the public on the website of the Senate Committee
on Appropriations (www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm).
Following is a list of congressionally directed spending
items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this
report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a
request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so
identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this
report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff
benefits as defined in rule XLIV.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Account Project title Funding Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM...................................... $500,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ALAMOGORDO, NM...................................................... $4,200,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK.......................................... $2,000,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ASCENSION PARISH, LA [EI]........................................... $1,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, GA............................ $1,000,000 Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD...................................... $4,500,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ....................... $5,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD.................................... $4,000,000 Johnson, Thune
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO................................... $750,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BRECKENRIDGE, MN.................................................... $5,000,000 Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BREVARD COUNTY, FL (MID AND SOUTH REACHES).......................... $500,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET (ABSECON ISLAND), NJ..... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE, NJ.......... $80,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC........................................ $900,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT............................................... $500,000 Leahy
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA.................................. $5,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER, TX................... $500,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA & PA $1,000,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA............................. $2,000,000 Mikulski, Cardin, Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL............................................... $3,500,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. COMITE RIVER, LA.................................................... $8,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX..................................... $2,000,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA.............................................. $500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER, TX........................ $22,000,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HELOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, BETHANY BEACH TO $1,750,000 Carper, Kaufman
SOUTH BETHANY, DE.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, REHOBETH BEACH $2,000,000 Carper, Kaufman
AND DEWEY BEACH, DE.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE....................................... $390,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, NJ, PA, DE................... $10,000,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA................................... $2,700,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA..................... $4,300,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DES PLAINES RIVER, IL............................................... $3,500,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM, MS........................ $8,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [FC].................................... $3,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. EAST BATON ROUGE, LA [EI]........................................... $500,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL..................................... $540,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. FARMINGTON RECHARGE, CA............................................. $1,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT...................................... $1,869,000 Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GENESEE COUNTY, MI.................................................. $600,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GEORGE W. KUHN DRAIN PROJECT, MI.................................... $300,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GRAND FORKS, ND--EAST GRAND FORKS, MN............................... $2,617,000 Dorgan, Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ............................. $3,500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI................... $2,000,000 Voinovich, Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV.......................................... $1,500,000 Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA................................................. $304,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ.......................................... $500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI......................................... $2,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OHIO.................................. $1,656,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. IAO STREAMS, HI..................................................... $250,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND LOGAN, WV, VA...................... $21,750,000 Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............................................. $950,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, VA............................. $2,234,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX................... $1,500,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. JOSEPH G. MINISH WATERFRONT, NJ..................................... $3,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. KAHUKU, HI.......................................................... $4,360,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT............................... $1,000,000 Leahy
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA [CG].................................... $4,600,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. LEE COUNTY, FL...................................................... $1,400,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, KY......... $6,750,000 ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. VIRGINIA........................................................ ($4,000,000) Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. WEST VIRGINIA................................................... ($2,750,000) Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [EI].......................................... $500,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV......................................... $1,955,000 Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY CITY LEVEE, MO.......................... $1,525,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MID VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA............................ $2,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELE, NM.......... $800,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS........................ $10,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO............... $1,000,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L-385), MO, IA, NE, KS................. $2,500,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND...................................... $300,000 Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MT. ZION MILL POND DAM, FULTON COUNTY, IN........................... $575,000 Lugar
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MUDDY RIVER, MA..................................................... $1,000,000 Kennedy, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MURRIETA CREEK, CA.................................................. $2,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NEGAUNEE, MI........................................................ $1,000,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY......................................... $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NEW YORK STATE CANAL, NY............................................ $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA......................... $1,000,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND....................... $15,000,000 Dorgan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL............................. $300,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. OHIO EI, OH......................................................... $1,000,000 Voinovich, Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ONONDAGA LAKE, NY................................................... $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NY............................................ $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL............................................. $500,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MGMT, NJ.................................. $1,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. PLACER COUNTY, CA................................................... $2,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. POPLAR ISLAND, MD................................................... $350,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA..................... $200,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RAMAPO RIVER AT MAHWAH AND SUFFERN, NJ.............................. $200,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ.................................. $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK........................... $1,000,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LA, AR & TX............................ $2,000,000 Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR & TX........................ $2,000,000 Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RICHMOND CSO, VA.................................................... $150,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ROSEAU, MN.......................................................... $2,500,000 Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RURAL IDAHO......................................................... $2,000,000 Crapo/Risch
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RURAL MONTANA, MT................................................... $5,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RURAL NEVADA [EI], NV............................................... $15,000,000 Reid, Ensign
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. RURAL UTAH, UT [EI]................................................. $20,000,000 Bennett
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA.............. $500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX................................. $5,000,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA.............................................. $2,500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.................................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SAULT STE MARIE REPLACEMENT LOCK, MI................................ $1,000,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA........................................ $5,000,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM.................................... $4,000,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO......................... $4,000,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA......................................... $3,000,000 Reid, Feinstein, Ensign
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. TAMPA HARBOR, FL.................................................... $500,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ............................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO......................................... $1,000,000 Roberts, Brownback, Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. TUSCALOOSA, AL...................................................... $10,000,000 Shelby
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. UNALASKA, AK........................................................ $2,000,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA........................................... $2,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA.................................. $1,200,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA................................................ $2,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES.................. ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL............................................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Guntersville Lake Hydrilla/Milfoil.............................. $150,000 Sessions
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Fife Lake Aquatic Weed Control, MI.............................. $145,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Black Lake, Ogdensburg, NY...................................... $100,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Sodus Bay, NY................................................... $100,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Lake Chautauqua, Jamestown, NY.................................. $50,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Lake Champlain, VT.............................................. $500,000 Leahy
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM...................................... ............... ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206)......................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Upper York Creek Dam Removal, CA................................ ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Tamarisk Eradication along the Colorado River, CO............... ............... M. Udall, Bennet
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Mill River Restoration, Stamford, CT............................ ............... Lieberman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Chattahoochee Fall-Line Ecosystem Restoration Project, GA....... ............... Chambliss
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Paradise Creek, ID.............................................. ............... Crapo/Risch
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Chariton River/Rathbun Lake, IA................................. ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Clear Creek and Iowa River, Johnson County, IA.................. ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Duck Creek, Davenport, IA....................................... ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Whitebreast Creek Watershed, IA................................. ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Buras Marina, LA................................................ ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. False River Ecosystem Restoration, Point Coupee, LA............. ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Lake Killarney, Louisiana State Penitentiary, LA................ ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Zemurray Park Lake Restoration, Tangipahoa Parish, LA........... ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Milford Pond Restoration, Milford, MA........................... ............... Kennedy, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, Howard County, MD........................ ............... Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Dog Island Shoals, MD........................................... ............... Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Greenbury Point, MD............................................. ............... Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. North Beach, MD................................................. ............... Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Northwest Branch, Anacostia River, MD........................... ............... Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Paint Branch Fish Passage, MD................................... ............... Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Painter Creek, MN............................................... ............... Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Musconetcong River Dam Removals, NJ............................. ............... Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Blue Hole Lake State Park, NM................................... ............... Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Janes-Wallace Memorial Dam, Santa Rosa, NM...................... ............... Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Kings Park, NY.................................................. ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Mud Creek, Great South Bay, NY.................................. ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Soundview Park, Bronx, NY....................................... ............... Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Spring Creek, NY................................................ ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Concord Streams Restoration, NC................................. ............... Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Western Cary Stream Restoration, Cary, NC....................... ............... Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Codorus Creek Watershed Restoration, PA......................... ............... Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Narrow River, RI................................................ ............... Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Winneapaug Pond Restoration, RI................................. ............... Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204, 207, 933)......... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Houma Navigation Canal Barrier Island Restoration, LA........... ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NJIWW, Dredged Hole 35, NJ...................................... ............... Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)................................ ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Indian Bayou, AR................................................ ............... Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Cosgrove Creek, Calaveras County, CA............................ ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Las Gallinas Creek/Santa Venetia Levee, CA...................... ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Pennsylvania Avenue Improvement, DE............................. ............... Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Indian/Dry Creek Cedar Rapids, IA............................... ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Winnebago River, Mason City, IA................................. ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Concordia, KS................................................... ............... Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Neodesha, KS.................................................... ............... Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Sedgwick, KS.................................................... ............... Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Hopkinsville Dry-Dam, KY........................................ ............... McConnell, Bunning
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. North River, Peabody, MA........................................ ............... Kennedy, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. McKinney Bayou, Tunica County, MS............................... ............... Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, MO................................ ............... Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Hatch, NM....................................................... ............... Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Assunpink Creek, Hamilton Township, Mercer County, NJ........... ............... Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Jackson Brook, NJ............................................... ............... Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Pennsville, NJ.................................................. ............... Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Port Jervis, NY................................................. ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Philadelphia Shipyard Sea Wall, Philadelphia, PA................ ............... Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. East Providence, RI............................................. ............... Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107).................................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Oyster Point Marina/Park Breakwater, CA......................... ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Napolean Avenue Container Terminal Access, New Orleans, LA...... ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Bass Harbor, ME................................................. ............... Collins
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Rhodes Point, Somerset Co, MD................................... ............... Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Woods Hole, Great Harbor, Woods Hole, MA........................ ............... Kennedy, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Northwestern Michigan, Traverse City, MI........................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Hampton Harbor, NH.............................................. ............... Gregg, Shaheen
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Delaware River, Fairless Turning Basin, PA...................... ............... Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Charlestown Breachway and Inlet, RI............................. ............... Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Point Judith Harbor, Expansion Study, RI........................ ............... Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Northwest Tennessee Regional Harbor, TN......................... ............... Alexander, Corker
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Tangier Island Jetty, VA........................................ ............... Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111)........................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Mattituck Harbor, NY............................................ ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135)...... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Lower Cache Restoration, AR..................................... ............... Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR.................................. ............... Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA............................ ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA....................................... ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Houma Navigation Canal Mile 12-31.4 Restoration, Terrebonne ............... Landrieu
Parish, LA.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Morganza Fore-Bay Restoration, LA............................... ............... Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Lincoln Park West, Ecosystem Restoration Study, NJ.............. ............... Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Las Cruces Dam Environmental Restoration, Dona Ana County, NM... ............... Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Northport Harbor, NY............................................ ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Smokes Creek, NY................................................ ............... Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Lake Champlain Lamprey Barriers, VT............................. ............... Leahy
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)...................................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Bay Farm Island, CA (Bay Farm Dike, CA)......................... ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Goleta Beach, CA................................................ ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Pismo Beach, CA................................................. ............... Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT.................................. ............... Lieberman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. Seaside Park, Ocean County, NJ.................................. ............... Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106-457).................... $1,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General................. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION............. $1,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN--ELM CREEK)......................... $190,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI............................................. $233,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ AMAZON CREEK, OR.................................................... $320,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD.............. $321,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ BALTIMORE METRO WATER RESOURCES--PATAPSCO URBAN RIVER REST, MD...... $100,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ BLOOMSBURG, PA...................................................... $130,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ BOGUE BANKS, NC..................................................... $135,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ BOSSIER PARISH, LA.................................................. $150,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ BRONX RIVER BASIN, NY............................................... $130,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO.......................................... $242,000 Bond, Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CACHE LA POUDRE, CO................................................. $50,000 M. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA........................................ $675,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA........................................... $153,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CEDAR RIVER TIME CHECK AREA, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA....................... $750,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY (SACRAMENTO-SAN $425,000 Feinstein
JOAQUIN COMPREHENSIVE).
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CENTRALIA, WA....................................................... $1,000,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA............................................ $1,000,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV.............................................. $600,000 Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL MANAGEMENT, MD........... $170,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, MD........ $200,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CHOWAN RIVER BASIN, VA.............................................. $215,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA.......................................... $130,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, NH & VT............ $380,000 Dodd, Lieberman, Kennedy, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ COYOTE DAM, CA...................................................... $100,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ CROSS LAKE, LA...................................................... $100,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX...................... $2,125,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ DELAWARE RIVER BASIN, PINE KNOT, PA................................. $130,000 Specter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, DE & NJ............ $166,000 Lautenberg, Specter, Kaufman,
Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA............................. $78,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD........................ $233,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, WA............................................. $255,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ FLAGER COUNTY, FL................................................... $496,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ FOUR MILE RUN, VA................................................... $100,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA................................... $255,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS.................... $162,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ GRAYSON AND MURDERER'S WALNUT CREEK BASIN, CA....................... $100,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS (RAP), MI......................... $850,000 Voinovich, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH............................... $437,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK....................................... $340,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ.................................... $170,000 Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer,
Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ HUMBOLT BAY LONG TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, CA....................... $130,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ HUMBOLT, IA......................................................... $130,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ JAMES RIVER, SD & ND................................................ $200,000 Dorgan
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI...................... $300,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ KOTZEBUE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK...................................... $210,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............................................. $441,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LAKE WORTH INLET, FL................................................ $100,000 Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI..................... $215,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LIDO KEY, SARASOTA, FL (SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL)..................... $340,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA......................... $100,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERCOURSE, HEADWORKS, CA........................ $230,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND VICINITY, CA........... $130,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA............................................. $250,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR.......................... $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ............................... $255,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI............................................ $202,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH........................... $640,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA.......................................... $100,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MANHATTAN, KS....................................................... $255,000 Roberts, Brownback
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR.......................................... $425,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MIAMI HARBOR, FL.................................................... $510,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MIDDLE CREEK, CA.................................................... $250,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MIDDLE POTOMAC COMP PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC........................ $255,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED, GREAT SENECA CREEK AND MUDDY BRANCH, MD... $255,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MILE POINT, FL (JACKSONVILLE)....................................... $185,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, MN....................................... $215,000 Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 & R460-471, MO.............. $340,000 Bond, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO.......................... $5,500,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MONTAUK POINT, NY................................................... $255,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ MONTPELIER, VT...................................................... $239,000 Leahy
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ NEW JERSEY SHORE PROECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ.......... $130,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM NOURISHMENT, NJ.......... $110,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA......................................... $90,000 Webb,
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED, NY......................................... $104,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC............................... $274,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, PA................ $2,000,000 Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ONONDAGA LAKE, NY................................................... $215,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ OOLOGAH LAKE WATERSHED, KS AND OK................................... $135,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PAJARO RIVER, CA.................................................... $425,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ......................................... $215,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ......................................... $215,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS........................................... $200,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............................................. $300,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL................................... $50,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR.............................................. $425,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LA.............................................. $107,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PORT OF IBERIA, LA.................................................. $1,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL............................................ $464,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ.............................................. $255,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ....................... $255,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ........................ $25,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION-BEACH, NJ..................... $110,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE....................... $300,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD AND MANITOBA, CANADA....... $2,900,000 Dorgan, Klobuchar, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA............................................. $210,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ REEDY RIVER, SC..................................................... $170,000 Graham
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX....................................... $120,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RIVER DES PERES, MO................................................. $100,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA........................................... $221,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ S. FORK , SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, (BUBBLY CREEK), IL........... $100,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX.......................................... $170,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, CA (SYSTEMS EVALUATION)........ $425,000 Feintein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA........................................... $100,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA...................................... $340,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA.......................................... $130,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), FRAZIER CREEK/STRATHMO, CA.......... $130,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY CREEK, CA........... $130,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA................ $640,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS, ORESTIMBA CREEK, CA....... $370,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA..................................... $425,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SANTA FE, NM........................................................ $228,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, GA PH II........................ $210,000 Chambliss, Graham
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON, PA............................. $214,000 Specter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SKAGIT RIVER, WA.................................................... $550,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA........................................... $300,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO............................................. $82,000 Bennet
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ................................ $215,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA................................... $425,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK......................... $255,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS, AR.............................................. $210,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA................ $425,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX........................... $143,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA.......................... $391,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ ST. HELENA-NAPA RIVER, CA........................................... $170,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ STILLAGUAMISH RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA....................... $130,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ.............................. $110,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA............................................ $130,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC............................... $187,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL $130,000 Mikulski
RESTORATION STUDY, MD, PA, & NY.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ TOPEKA, KS.......................................................... $150,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV................................................. $10,000,000 Reid, Ensign
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, FLOODPLAIN RECONNECTION, NY......... $130,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, LIVINGSTON MANOR, NY................ $170,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER GUYANDOTTE, WV................................................ $300,000 Byrd
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, MN & WI............ $640,000 Durbin, Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER MISS-ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI.................. $9,000,000 Durbin, Harkin, Bond, Grassley,
Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA..................................... $1,700,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II)............................. $170,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS.............................................. $170,000 Roberts, Brownback
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK......................................... $385,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ VICINITY OF WILLOUGHBY SPIT, VA..................................... $243,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WAIAKEA-PALAI STREAMS, HI........................................... $300,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WALILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI........................................... $175,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WALTON COUNTY, FL................................................... $229,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK............................................. $215,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WATERTOWN AND VICINITY, SD.......................................... $448,000 Johnson, Thune
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WELLS LOCK AND DAM, LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV (LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, $40,000 Byrd
WV).
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WEST MAUI FEASIBILITY STUDY, HI..................................... $100,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WEST SACRAMENTO, CA................................................. $950,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA.................................. $425,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI............................... $340,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WESTMINSTER (EAST GARDEN GROVE) WATERSHED, CA....................... $100,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO............................ $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR............................ $170,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WHITTIER HARBOR, AK................................................. $340,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR......................... $215,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ GENERAL INVESTIGATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES................. ...............
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES............................ ...............
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS......................................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ LAKE TAHOE.......................................................... $400,000 Reid, Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES....................................... ...............
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Delaware Estuary Salinity Monitoring Study, DE & NJ............. $200,000 Lautenberg, Kaufman, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Hawaii DOT GIS, HI.............................................. $100,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Hawaii Water Resources Management, HI........................... $270,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii, State of Hawaii and Pacific $100,000 Inouye
Territories, HI.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Waimanalo Wastewater Effluent Reuse Plan, State of Hawaii and $67,000 Inouye
Pacific Territories, HI.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ State of Hawaii General Flood Control Plan Update, State of $1,000,000 Inouye, Akaka
Hawaii and Pacific Territories, HI.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA................................ $36,000 Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Lake County Wetlands Restoration, IL............................ $200,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Choctaw County Reservoir, MS.................................... $100,000 Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Oklahoma Comp Water Plan, OK.................................... $500,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Storm Water Management Plan for Coastal Communities, VA......... $220,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA.................................. ............... ................................
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION....................................... ............... ................................
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM................................ $1,000,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ PACIFIC ISLAND LAND OCEAN TYPHOON EXPERIMENT, HI................ $1,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ SURGE AND WAVE ISLAND MODELING STUDIES, HI...................... $1,250,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES..................................... ............... ................................
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ White Clay Creek, New Castle, DE................................ $200,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Hawaii Technical Services, HI................................... $40,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Hurricane Evacuation Studies, Hawaii............................ $1,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Waiohuli Gulch Flood Hazard Study, Kula, Maui, HI............... $200,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Iowa Multi-State Dam Safety Analyses, IA........................ $37,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Little Sioux Watershed, IA...................................... $50,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Mon-Maq Dam Removal Study & Local Floodplain Master Planning, $120,000 Harkin, Grassley
Monticello, IA.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Chitimacha Tribe of LA, [GIS]................................... $250,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ City of Alexandria, LA [GIS].................................... $200,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ East Baton Rouge Parish, LA [GIS]............................... $1,200,000 Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Livingston Parish, LA [GIS]..................................... $350,000 Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Floodplain maps for Manalapan and Matchaponix Brooks, NJ........ $500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Southeastern, PA................................................ $250,000 Specter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............................................ $5,000,000 Cochran
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, MD................................ $1,000,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................ Urban Flood Demonstration Program, DRI, NV...................... $2,500,000 Reid
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 106......................................................... ............... Cochran
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 107......................................................... ............... Johnson, Thune
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 108......................................................... ............... Bennett, Tester
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 109......................................................... ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 110......................................................... ............... Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 111......................................................... ............... Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 112......................................................... ............... Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 113......................................................... ............... Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 114......................................................... ............... Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 205......................................................... ............... Tester
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 206......................................................... ............... Reid
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 207......................................................... ............... Reid
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision..................... Section 208......................................................... ............... Reid
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR............................................ $10,000,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN............... $16,565,000 Cochran, Pryor, Landrieu, Bond,
Lincoln, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.......................................... $3,700,000 Pryor, Bond
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.............................. $336,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA............................................... $10,166,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS................................ $3,200,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS........................... $23,200,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--MAIN STEM, MS.......................................... $25,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--REFORMULATION UNIT, MS................................. $1,500,000 Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS............................... $13,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU............................. $75,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG.............................. YAZOO BASIN--YAZOO BACKWATER, MS.................................... $669,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI.............................. QUIVER RIVER, MS.................................................... $160,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI.............................. SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR.............................................. $300,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI.............................. SPRING BAYOU, LA.................................................... $350,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI.............................. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA.................................. $1,665,000 Cochran, Landrieu, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR.................................. $211,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR................................ $25,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN............... $3,697,000 Cochran, Landrieu, Pryor,
Lincoln, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... BONNET CARRE, LA.................................................... $1,085,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA............................ $1,442,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... OLD RIVER, LA....................................................... $461,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS............................................... $476,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS................................................ $495,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS..................................... $779,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS................................ $2,246,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS.......................................... $1,725,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS....................................... $1,050,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.......................................... $1,067,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS........................................ $1,854,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS........................................ $47,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS........................ $68,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--Maintenance..................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.......................................... $3,600,000 Pryor, Bond, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Absecon Inlet, NJ................................................... $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Appomattox River, VA................................................ $500,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Ashtabula Harbor, OH................................................ $1,000,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway--DSC, VA............................. $320,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, GA.................................. $735,000 Chambliss
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, SC.................................. $500,000 Graham
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Baltimore Harbor and Channel (50 Foot), MD.......................... $4,487,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME............................................ $60,000 Collins
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Beaufort Harbor, NC................................................. $250,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Blakely Mt Dam, Lake Ouachita, AR................................... $500,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Block Island Harbor of Refuge, RI................................... $1,250,000 Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Bogue Inlet, NC..................................................... $650,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME....................................... $750,000 Collins
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Bull Shoals Lake, AR................................................ $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Calcasieu River and Pass, LA........................................ $6,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Carolina Beach Inlet, NC............................................ $500,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Caruthersville Harbor, MO........................................... $760,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, SD................... $3,000,000 Johnson, Thune
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Clairborne County Port, MS.......................................... $72,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Clearwater Lake, MO................................................. $85,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Cleveland Harbor, OH................................................ $1,000,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Cocheco River Dredging Project, NH.................................. $2,000,000 Gregg, Shaheen
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA & OR................................ $641,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Columbia River Between Chinook and Sand Island, WA.................. $840,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Coos Bay, OR........................................................ $452,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. DeGray Lake, AR..................................................... $500,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Depoe Bay, OR....................................................... $118,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Fox River, WI....................................................... $2,000,000 Kohl
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND.................................... $200,000 Dorgan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Georgetown Harbor, SC............................................... $1,000,000 Graham
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (New Harbor)...................... $100,000 Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Green Bay Harbor, WI................................................ $3,000,000 Kohl
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Gulfport Harbor, MS................................................. $1,530,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, DE......................................... $200,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Illinois Waterway, IL & IN (MVR Portion)............................ $900,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL.... $1,220,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL.................... $189,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, LA.................................... $3,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Kodiak Harbor, AK................................................... $240,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Lake Providence Harbor, LA.......................................... $478,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Lockwoods Folly River, NC........................................... $600,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Lower Monumental Lock & Dam, WA..................................... $4,000,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Madison Parish Port, LA............................................. $92,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Marina Del Rey, CA.................................................. $3,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Michigan Harbor Dredging, MI........................................ $7,000,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Alpena Harbor, MI................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Arcadia Harbor, MI.................................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Au Sable, MI........................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Bay Port Harbor, MI................................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Big Bay Harbor, MI.................................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Black River (Gogebic), MI........................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Bolles Harbor, MI................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Clinton River, MI................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Eagle Harbor, MI.................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Frankfort Harbor, MI................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Inland Route, MI.................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI............................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Leland Harbor, MI................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI.................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Little Lake Harbor, MI.............................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Ludington Harbor, MI................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Manistee Harbor, MI................................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Manistique Harbor, MI............................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Marquette Harbor, MI................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Menominee Harbor, MI................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. New Buffalo Harbor, MI.............................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Pentwater Harbor, MI................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Point Lookout Harbor, MI............................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Port Austin Harbor, MI.............................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI............................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Portage Harbor, MI.................................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Rouge River, MI..................................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Saugatuck Harbor, MI................................................ ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. South Haven Harbor, MI.............................................. ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. White Lake Harbor, MI............................................... ............... Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Missouri River--Rulo to the Mouth, IA, KS, MO & NE.................. $941,000 Harkin, Bond, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Mouth of Yazoo River, MS............................................ $72,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Narrows Dam, Lake Greeson, AR....................................... $500,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. New Madrid Harbor (Mile 889), MO.................................... $200,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. New Madrid Harbor, MO............................................... $310,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. New Topsail Inlet, NC............................................... $600,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Newburyport Harbor, MA.............................................. $350,000 Kennedy, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Norwalk Harbor, CT.................................................. $1,000,000 Dodd, Lieberman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD.................. $1,400,000 Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Ogdensburg Harbor, NY............................................... $70,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Osceola Harbor, AR.................................................. $403,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Oswego Harbor, NY................................................... $300,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Pascagoula Harbor, MS............................................... $3,395,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay & Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT. $200,000 Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Petersburg North Harbor, AK......................................... $500,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Port St. Joe, FL, DMMP.............................................. $500,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Providence Harbor Shipping Channel, RI.............................. $300,000 Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Raritan River, NJ................................................... $380,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Red Rock Dam and Lake, Red Rock, IA................................. $589,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Rosedale Harbor, MS................................................. $585,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA.................................... $300,000 Isakson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Saylorville Lake, IA................................................ $347,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Somerset County Channels, MD........................................ $1,000,000 Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS........... $400,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS............................... $2,022,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Texas Water Allocation Assessment, TX............................... $900,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Toledo Harbor, OH................................................... $1,000,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR............................ $831,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Wilmington Harbor, DE............................................... $2,000,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Wilson Lake, KS..................................................... $300,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Yazoo River, MS..................................................... $119,000 Cochran
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Yellow Bend Port, AR................................................ $111,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Operation and Maintenance Items Not Listed Under States............. ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM.................................... $5,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.................. ...............
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Hawaii RSM, HI.................................................. $500,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Southeast Oahu Regional Sediment Management, HI................. $500,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. North Carolina RSM, NJ.......................................... $600,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Delaware Estuary RSM, NJ........................................ $200,000 Lautenberg, Kaufman, Menendez,
Lautenberg
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. South Coastal Rhode Island Regional Sediment Management......... $750,000 Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance............. Chesapeake Bay, Newpoint Comfort, Mathews County, VA............ $350,000 Webb, Warner
Bureau of Reclamation.......... California Bay-Delta Restoration...... CALFED.............................................................. $10,000,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER & RECLAMATION REUSE.................... $500,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... CHIMAYO, NM......................................................... $500,000 Bingaman
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS (NORTH LAS VEGAS, WATER REUSE).............. $2,000,000 Reid
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... CVP--FRIANT DIVISION................................................ $500,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... CVP--SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION........................................... $7,000,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... DESCHUTES PROJECT................................................... $500,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY............................... $500,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... FORT PECK DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM............................ $10,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT...................... $100,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... IRVINE BASIN GROUND & SURFACE WATER................................. $100,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM..................... $4,000,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM.................................... $1,200,000 Reid, Ensign
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS........................................ $2,500,000 Reid, Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM.................................. $14,000,000 Harkin, Johnson, Grassley,
Klobuchar, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... LOAN FOR WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE, AZ............................ $3,209,000 Kyl
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION PROGRAM........ $2,500,000 Hutchison
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT........................................... $160,000 T. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... MILK RIVER/ST. MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT................ $1,500,000 Tester
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... MNI WICONI PROJECT.................................................. $10,000,000 Johnson, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... MOKELUMNE RIVER REGIONAL WATER STORAGE & CONJUNCTIVE USE............ $500,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY.......................................... $7,791,000 Bingaman, T. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ $500,000 Bennett
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY........................................ $3,000,000 Murray, Cantwell
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM....................................... $150,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM................................... $1,000,000 Johnson, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION....................... $33,707,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM................. $15,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION.......................... $200,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... TUALATIN VALLEY WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY............................ $300,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... WEBER BASIN PROJECT................................................. $1,000,000 Bennett, Hatch
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... WICHITA PROJECT--EQUUS BEDS DIVISION................................ $2,000,000 Roberts, Brownback
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT........................ $1,500,000 Murray
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES................. ...............
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM............................. $680,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............................................ ...............
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM...................................... $1,000,000 Feinstein, Bennet
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources........... TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM....................... $2,500,000 Reid
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy Energy Development and Reliability (ND)............................. $325,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy Navajo Nation Electrification Program (NM).......................... $1,750,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy North Dakota Energy Workforce Development (ND)...................... $1,900,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy Oswego County BOCES Wind Turbine Model Project (NY)................. $200,000 Senator Schumer
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy Power Grid Reliability and Security (WA)............................ $1,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy Technology Development (ND)......................................... $300,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy UVM Smart Energy Grid Research (VT)................................. $500,000 Senator Leahy
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Electricity Delivery and Energy Watkins Glen, Schuyler County Gas Storage Project (NY).............. $500,000 Senator Gillibrand
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 21st Century Renewable Fuels, Energy, and Materials Initiative (MI). $1,250,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy A123Systems Large Format Nanophosphate Batteries for Solar Energy $1,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Storage (MI).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Algae Biofuels Research (WA)........................................ $2,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Algae to Ethanol Research and Evaluation (NJ)....................... $750,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Algal-Based Renewable Energy for Nevada (NV)........................ $800,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alternative and Unconventional Energy Research and Development (UT). $10,000,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alternative Energy School of the Future (NV)........................ $1,200,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bayview Gas to Energy Project (UT).................................. $1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Ben Franklin Technology Partners--Clean Technology Commercialization $500,000 Senators Specter, Casey
Initiative (PA).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Biodiesel Blending (WI)............................................. $600,000 Senator Kohl
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Biodiesel Feedstock Development Initiative (MO)..................... $1,000,000 Senator Bond
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Biomass Energy Resources Center (VT)................................ $1,000,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Black Hills State Heating and Cooling Plant (SD).................... $1,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Cellulosic Diesel Biorefinery (NJ).................................. $1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Center for Biomass Utilization (ND)................................. $7,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Center for Nanoscale Energy (ND).................................... $5,000,000 Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Center for Ocean Renewable Energy................................... $750,000 Senator Shaheen
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility (VT)..................... $500,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Clean Power and Energy Research Consortium (LA)..................... $1,000,000 Senator Landrieu
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Demonstration (IL)............ $500,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Cooling Heating and Power (Micro-CHP) and Bio-Fuel Application $2,000,000 Senator Cochran
Center (MS).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Development of an Economic and Efficient Biodiesel Production $750,000 Senator Hagan
Process (NC).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes (NV)......... $1,500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion $6,000,000 Senator Inouye
(HI).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DRI Renewable Energy Center [REC] (NV).............................. $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Storage/Conservation and Carbon Emissions Reduction $400,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Demonstration Project (MA).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EngenuitySC Commercialization and Entrepreneurial Training Project $500,000 Senator Graham
(SC).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Demonstration Energy Park (NV)......... $200,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Process Project (MA)..... $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fuel Cell Durability Research (CT).................................. $1,000,000 Senator Dodd
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Gas heat pump cooperative training program (NV)..................... $250,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass (RI)............................. $1,500,000 Senator Reed
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Great Basin College--Direct-Use Geothermal Demonstration Project $1,000,000 Senator Reid
(NV).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Great Lakes Institute for Energy Innovation (OH).................... $1,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech University, $2,000,000 Senator Hutchison
Lubbock, TX (TX).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program (HI)........................... $6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture (HI).................... $6,000,000 Senator Inouye
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy High Speed Wind Turbine Noise Model with Suppression (MS)........... $1,000,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Hydrogen Production and Delivery Technology (CT).................... $500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy HyperCAST R&D Funding for Vehicle Energy Efficiency (CO)............ $750,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Independent Energy Community Renewable Power System (UT)............ $1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Institute for Sustainable Energy (AL)............................... $750,000 Senator Sessions
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Iowa Central Community College Renewable Fuel Testing Laboratory $750,000 Senator Harkin
(IA).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Lane Community College Energy Demonstration Building (OR)........... $550,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Lansing Plug-In Hybrid Initiative (MI).............................. $750,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Low Cost Production of Thin-film Photovoltaic (PV) Cells (PA)....... $1,200,000 Senator Specter
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Marine Energy Technology (WA)....................................... $1,750,000 Senator Murray
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy Consortium (AR)........................ $1,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Montana Algal BioDiesel Initiative (MT)............................. $500,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Montana Bio-Energy Center of Excellence (MT)........................ $2,250,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Nanostructured Materials for Improved Photovoltaics (MS)............ $1,000,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Nanostructured Solar Cells for Increased Efficiency and Lower Cost $500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
(AR).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy National Center of Excellence in Energy Storage Technology (OH)..... $1,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy National Open--Ocean Energy Laboratory (FL)......................... $2,000,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX (TX) $2,000,000 Senator Hutchison
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Near zero carbon footprint energy creation through thermal oxidation $1,000,000 Senator Specter
(PA).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Nevada Renewable Energy Integration and Development Consortium (NV). $3,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy NIREC--Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization (NV). $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Northern Nevada Renewable Energy Training Project (NV).............. $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Norwich Cogeneration Initiative (CT)................................ $750,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Novel Photocatalytic Metal Oxides (NE).............................. $250,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Offshore Wind Initiative (ME)....................................... $5,000,000 Senators Collins, Snowe
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center (OH)...................... $500,000 Senator Brown
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Oregon Solar Highway--Innovative Use of Solar Technology (OR)....... $1,000,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project (CA)................ $1,000,000 Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Power Cube for Wind Power and Grid Regulation Services (PA)......... $500,000 Senator Specter
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Clean Air Project [RECAP] (MN)..................... $1,000,000 Senator Klobuchar
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Demonstration (IL)................................. $500,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Feasibility Study and Resources Assessment (NV).... $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Initiative (IL).................................... $500,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Initiatives for Clark County, Nevada Parks and $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Recreation (NV).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Research on Fuel Cell Powered by Hydrogen Produced from Biomass to $675,000 Senator Schumer
Provide Clean Energy for Remote Farms away from Electric Grids (NY).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy San Francisco Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Initiative (CA)....... $500,000 Senator Boxer
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Shenandoah Valley as a National Demonstration Project Achieving 25 $750,000 Senators Webb, Warner
Percent Renewable Energy by the Year 2025 (VA).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Smart Energy Program (CT)........................................... $500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Compactor Energy Efficiency Research Demonstration Project $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
(MA).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Development, University of Maine, Presque Isle, ME..... $800,000 Senator Collins
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Electric Power for Nonsectarian Educational and Social $500,000 Senator Reid
Services Facility (NV).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Zone Planning and Infrastructure for the Nevada Test $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Site and Adjacent Lands (NV).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Panels in Municipal Owned Buildings (NJ)...................... $1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Pioneer and Solar Entrepreneur Programs (NY).................. $500,000 Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Southern Pine Based Biorefinery Center (GA)......................... $1,000,000 Senator Chambliss
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Designs (MS).... $4,000,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project (AK)............ $2,500,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Strategic Biomass Initiative (MS)................................... $500,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Student Sustainability Initiatives (VT)............................. $300,000 Senator Sanders
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Sun Grant Initiative (SD)........................................... $2,750,000 Senator Johnson
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Sustainable Energy Research Center (MS)............................. $10,000,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Switchgrass Biofuel Research: Carbon Sequestration and Life Cycle $500,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Analysis (NE).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy The CUNY Energy Institute (NY)...................................... $1,550,000 Senators Schumer, Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development (VT).................. $500,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Unconventional and Renewable Energies Research Utilizing Computer $2,500,000 Senator Bennett
Simulations (UT).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy University of Louisville Research and Energy Independence Program $2,000,000 Senator McConnell
(KY).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy University of New Haven Solar Testing and Training Lab (CT)......... $500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy UNR--Biodiesel from Food Waste (NV)................................. $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy UNR--Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy (NV).................. $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy UNR--Mass Exchanger Technology for Geothermal and Solar Energy $1,200,000 Senator Reid
Systems (NV).
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vermont Biofuels Initiative (VT).................................... $750,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VT).......................... $450,000 Senator Sanders
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wallowa County Integrated Biomass Energy Center (OR)................ $500,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Washoe Wind Turbine Demonstration Project (NV)...................... $50,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind Turbine Development (MT)....................................... $1,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind Turbine Infrastructure for Green Energy and Research on Wind $1,000,000 Senators Carper, Kaufman
Power in Delaware (DE).
Department of Energy........... Environmental Management--Defense..... Characteristics and Cleanup of the U.S. Nuclear Legacy (MS)......... $4,000,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Design and Test of an Advanced SOFC Generator in PA (PA)............ $1,000,000 Senator Specter
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Fossil Fuel Research and Development (ND)........................... $4,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium (MS).................... $1,200,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing Station (WV)............................... $1,200,000 Senator Byrd
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a $1,250,000 Senator Byrd
Coal Liquefaction Sector in China (WV).
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Montana ICTL Demonstration (MT)..................................... $1,250,000 Senator Baucus
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... National Center for Hydrogen Technology (ND)........................ $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Membranes (UT).................. $1,500,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Shallow Carbon Sequestration Pilot Demonstration (MO)............... $2,400,000 Senator Bond
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Utah Center for Ultra-Clean Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil Research $8,000,000 Senator Bennett
(UT).
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy......................... Utah Coal and Biomass to Fuel Pilot Plant........................... $2,500,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Nuclear Energy........................ Nuclear Fabrication Consortium (OH)................................. $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering Equipment (IN)............... $1,000,000 Senator Lugar
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Alaska Climate Center (AK).......................................... $1,000,000 Senator Murkowski
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Antibodies Research (ND)............................................ $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Carbon Nanotube Technology Center [CANTEC] (OK)..................... $1,000,000 Senator Inhofe
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Center for Advanced Bio-Based Binders and Pollution Reduction $950,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Technologies at the University of Northern Iowa (IA).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems (WV).............................. $3,000,000 Senator Byrd
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials (NM)................... $750,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Clean Energy Infrastructure Educational Initiative (OH)............. $500,000 Senator Brown
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Climate Model Evaluation Program (AL)............................... $1,800,000 Senator Shelby
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Computing Capability (ND)........................................... $5,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Development of Ultrafiltration Membrane-Separation Technology for $800,000 Senator Reid
Energy-Efficient Water Treatment and Desalination Process (NV).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Enhancement for the Intermountain Center for River Restoration and $600,000 Senator Bennett
Rehabilitation (UT).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Environmental Quality Monitoring and Analysis (IL).................. $500,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Fuel Cell Research, Brown University, RI (RI)....................... $1,500,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Functional MRI Research (VT)........................................ $1,200,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Idaho Accelerator Center Production of Medical Isotopes (ID)........ $1,500,000 Senators Crapo, Risch
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Kansas University Cancer Research Equipment (KS).................... $4,000,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Marine Systems Energy/Environmental Sustainability Research (MA).... $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Martin County Microfiber Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Development $1,000,000 Senators Burr, Hagen
(NC).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Material Science Smart Coatings (NE)................................ $500,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Nanotechnology Initiative (CT)...................................... $750,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Nevada Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization Center $500,000 Senator Reid
[CAVE] (NV).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Performance Assessment Institute (NV)............................... $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Pioneer Valley Life Science Institute Translational Biomedical $400,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Research (MA).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Renovation and Development of the LSU Nuclear Science Building (LA). $1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... RNAI Research (MA).................................................. $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Science Center Equipment and Energy Efficient LEED Technology (UT).. $900,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Smart Grid Communications Security Project (CO)..................... $1,000,000 Senator Mark Udall
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... SUU Science Center Energy Efficiency Modernization and Enhancement $1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Project (UT).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Targeted Radiotherapy for Melanoma (MA)............................. $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Technology Transfer & Commercialization of Technologies at DOE $750,000 Senator Bingaman
Laboratories. (NM).
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... The New School Green Building (NY).................................. $1,000,000 Senators Schumer, Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy (SD)..................... $1,100,000 Senator Johnson
Department of Energy........... Office of Science..................... Yttrium-90 Microspheres Research (WA)............................... $1,250,000 Senator Murray
Department of Energy........... Other Defense Activities.............. Burlington Atomic Energy Commission Plant [BAECP] and Ames $1,000,000 Senator Harkin
Laboratory Former Workers Medical Surveillance Programs [FWP] (IA).
Department of Energy........... Other Defense Activities.............. Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN $1,000,000 Senator McConnell
(KY, OH, TN).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Account Project title Funding Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AIWW, BRIDGES AT DEEP CREEK, VA................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ALTON TO GALE LEVEE DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR)................................ $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA.................................. $6,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), CA......................... $66,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE), CA................................. $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ANTELOPE CREEK, NE.............................................................. $5,697,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, NY....................... $3,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO............................................. $5,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.............................................................. $86,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX........................................................ $5,300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY).................................................... $24,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC................................................. $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL.................................................. $5,565,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CENTER HILL DAM (SEEPAGE CONTROL), TN........................................... $56,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (DEF CORR).......................... $6,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHESTERFIELD, MO................................................................ $3,331,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL.......................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN........................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHIEF JOSEPH GAS ABATEMENT, WA.................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL)........................................... $40,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR & WA......................................... $85,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA............................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DES PLAINES RIVER, IL........................................................... $6,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DOVER DAM, MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE)........................... $18,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA.............................................. $2,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. EAST ST. LOUIS, IL.............................................................. $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ELK CREEK LAKE, OR.............................................................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION).................... $25,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY.......................................... $5,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND (REPLACEMENT).................................. $8,620,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ......................................... $6,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA...................................... $14,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE CONTROL)....................................... $130,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA........................................................... $13,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA................................................ $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (REPLACEMENT)........................... $16,915,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. KAWEAH RIVER, CA................................................................ $640,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY...................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (CG)................................................ $5,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN........................................................ $20,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................................ $6,210,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY........................................................... $700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, CA................................... $885,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA, OR.............................. $1,650,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMP, WA, OR, ID............................ $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY, IL (MAJOR REHAB).................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MARTIN COUNTY, FL............................................................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL.............................................. $25,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL..................... $580,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE.............................. $60,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA............................................. $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA............................................................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MUDDY RIVER, MA................................................................. $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA........................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NAPA RIVER, CA.................................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ......................................... $60,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA............................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA............................................ $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY...................................... $105,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL............................................................. $6,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR................................................. $42,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. PRESQUE ISLE, PA................................................................ $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ.................................. $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC......................................... $1,615,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM........................ $800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR............................................................ $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA.................................. $1,075,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA........................................... $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA.................................... $15,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA.................................................... $52,193,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA............................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX......................................................... $18,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL.............................. $163,402,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA............................................. $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO.................................................. $566,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK............................................................. $3,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (DAM SAFETY), CA........................................ $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX.......................................................... $6,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO..................................................... $3,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI........................ $18,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WASHINGTON, DC & VICINITY....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, NC....................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WEST SACRAMENTO, CA............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WILLAMETTE TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR.............................................. $11,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC........................................................... $1,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL)........................... $123,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL............................................................ $1,170,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES............................. ............... .......................
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL........................................................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM.................................................. ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206)................................. $25,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Goose Creek, CO............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Jackson Creek, Gwinnett Co, GA............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Little River Watershed, Hall County, GA.................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Chariton River and Rathbun Lake Watershed, IA.............................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Emiquon Preserve, IL....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Orland Park, IL............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Storm Lake, IA............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Ventura Marsh, IA.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Malden River Ecosystem, MA................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Wilson Bay Restoration, Jacksonville, NC................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Drayton Dam, ND............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Camp Creek, Zumwalt Prairie Preserve, OR................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Eugene Delta Ponds, OR..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Kellogg Creek, OR.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Oaks Bottom, OR............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Springfield Millrace, OR................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Moses Lake, TX............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Rio Grande Ecosystem Restoration, Laredo, TX............................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Spring Lake, San Marcos, TX................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Stephenville WWTP, TX...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Carpenter Creek, WA........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material (Sections 204, 207, 933)............... ............... .......................
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Blackhawk Bottoms, IA...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Atchafalaya River, Shell Island Pass, St. Mary Parish, LA.................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Calc Rv, Mi 5-14 Ks, LA.................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, MA............................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Newbury Harbor, MA......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NJIWW Beneficial Use of Dredge, NJ......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Buffalo River, NY.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Manteo Old House, NC....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Maumee Bay Regional Sediment Management, OH................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Wynn Road Regional Sediment management, OH................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. South Padre Island, TX..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14).................. $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)........................................ $38,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Wynne, AR.................................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Eureka Creek, Manhattan, KS................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO...................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Livingston, MT............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Platt River, Fremont, NE................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Platt River, Schuyler, NE.................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH (Ottawa, OH)................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Duck Creek, OH............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Findlay, OH................................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Rio Desclabrado, PR........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Rio Guamani-Guaya, PR...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Beaver Creek and Tribs, Bristol, TN........................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WV Statewide Flood Warning System, WV...................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)............................................ $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Savoonga Harbor, AK........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME.............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mackinac Island Harbor Breakwater, MI...................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mitigation of Shore Damages (Section 111).................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mobile Pass, AL............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. East Pass Channel, Panama City, FL......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Brun Harbor/Jekyll Improvements, GA........................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Camp Ellis, Saco, ME....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Manistee Harbor and River Channel, MI...................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Fairport Harbor, OH........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Vermillion Harbor, OH...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Whitcomb Flats, WA......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135).............. $25,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Lower Kingman Island, DC................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Braided Reach, ID.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Shorty's Island, ID........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Green River Dam Mod, KY.................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Bloomington State Park, MO................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Blue Valley Wetlands, Jackson County, MO................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Duck Creek, Stoddard County, MO............................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Aquatic Habitat Restoration at Pueblo of Santa Ana, NM..................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Prison Farm Shoreline Habitat, ND.......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Tappan Lake, OH............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Lower Columbia Slough, OR.................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Walla Walla River, OR...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Bennington Lake Diversion Dam, WA.......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Shore Protection (Section 103)............................................. ............... .......................
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Coastal Areas, Marshfield, MA.............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Fort San Geronimo, PR...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Lincoln Park Beach, WA..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Snagging and Clearing (Section 208)........................................ ............... .......................
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Camp Bayou Canal, Morehouse Parish, LA..................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Snagging and Clearing Upper Bayou Boeuf, LA................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Auglaize River, OH......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Blackwell Lake, Blackwell, OK.............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SWCD Flood Reduction, OR................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAM............................. $49,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Isabella Dam, CA........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Martis Creek Dam, CA & NV.................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Cherry Creek Dam, CO....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Dworshak Dam, ID........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. John Day Lock and Dam, OR & WA............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Seepage/Stability Correction Studies........................................ ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Blakely Mountain Dam, AR................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Hidden Dam, CA............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. San Antonio Dam, CA........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Terminus Dam, CA........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Whittier Narrows Dam, CA................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Trinidad Dam, CO........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Hop Brook Dam, CT.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mansfield Hollow Dam, CT................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Herbert Hoover Dike (Reach 2&3), FL........................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Dworshak Dam, ID........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. La Grange L&D, IL.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Lake Shelbyville Dam, IL................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mississippi River, Lock and Dam 24, IL&MO.................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mississippi River, Lock and Dam 25, IL&MO.................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Thomas J. O'Brien Controlling Works L&D, IL................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Brookville Dam, IN......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. J. Edward Roush Dam, IN.................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Patoka Lake Dam, IN........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Salamonie Lake Dam, IN..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Hartford Levee at John Redmond, KS......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Green River Lake Dam, KY................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Markland Locks and Dam, KY & OH............................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Nolin Lake Dam, KY......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Rough River Lake, Dam, KY.................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Salamonie Lake Dam, KY..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Russell B. Long L&D, LA.................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Westville Lake Dam, MA..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mississippi River Lock and Dam 1, MN....................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mississippi River Lock and Dam 2, MN....................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mississippi River Lock and Dam 3, MN....................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Orwell Reservoir Dam, MN................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Arkabutla, MS.............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Cape Fear River Lock and Dam 1, NC......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Beach City Dam, OH......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Bolivar Dam, OH............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Delaware Dam, OH........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Magnolia Levee,(Bolivar Dam), OH........................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mohawk Dam, OH............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Cumberland Dike--Texoma, OK................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Keystone Lake Dam, OK...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, OK............................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Bonneville Lock and Dam, OR & WA........................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Foster Dam, OR............................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Willamette Falls Lock, OR.................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Charlerois (MonoR), PA..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Curwensville Dam, PA....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. East Branch Dam, Clarion River, PA......................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Hammond Dam, PA............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Montgomery Locks and Dam, PA............................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. J. Percy Priest, TN........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Addicks Dam, Buffalo Bayou, TX............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Barker Dam (Buffalo Bayou,), TX............................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Lewisville Dam, TX......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Proctor Dam, TX............................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Stillhouse-Hollow Dam, TX.................................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Town Bluff Dam, TX......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Whitney Levee, TX.......................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Ball Mountain Dam, VT...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Howard Hansen Dam, WA...................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Mill Creek and Mill Creek Diversion Dam, WA................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. New Cumberland L&D, WV..................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Cedars Lock and Dam, WI.................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Depere Gen Laws, WI........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Little Chute, WI........................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, WI............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (DMDF)............................. $5,199,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Jacksonville Harbor, FL..................................................... ($1,000,000) The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Savannah Harbor, GA......................................................... ($900,000) The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Calumet Harbor and River, IL & IN........................................... ($1,501,000) The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. Charleston Harbor, SC....................................................... ($1,798,000) The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND..................................................... $21,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106-457)................................ $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD EXPENSES).................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE EXP)........................................... $275,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI......................................................... $408,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ AUGUSTA, GA..................................................................... $278,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA........................................................... $1,239,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA............................................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX................................... $526,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY........................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ CALCASIEU LOCK, LA.............................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA..................................... $900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA................................................... $950,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ CURRITUCK SOUND, NC............................................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ................................................ $290,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)................................................ $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD.................................... $483,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ EDISTO ISLAND, SC............................................................... $167,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ FREEPORT HARBOR, TX............................................................. $675,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX.............................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI..................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GREEN RIVER WATERSHED, KY....................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX...................................... $423,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL..................................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HAMILTON CITY, CA............................................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY.................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ............................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL............................................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ INDIAN RIVER LAGOON NORTH, FL................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ INDIANA HARBOR, IN.............................................................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQ NUISANCE, IL, IN, OH, WI $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH NY..................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (Section 216)............................ $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................................................... $224,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA................................ $23,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOUISIANA COASTAL PROTECTION & RESTORATION (LACPR), LA.......................... $3,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX.................................................. $425,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA & OR............................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA....................................................... $112,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA........................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN....................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD (MN RIVER AUTHORITY)................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS............................................. $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC........................................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX................................................ $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, GA................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA.......................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PIMA COUNTY, AZ................................................................. $275,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL...................................................... $510,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA............................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PUYALLUP RIVER, WA.............................................................. $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD AND MANITOBA, CANADA................... $3,050,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX............................................................ $304,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX................................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA.................................... $468,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA................................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ............................................ $511,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA.................................................. $278,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ST LOUIS, MO (WATERSHED)........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SUTTER COUNTY, CA............................................................... $339,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ TOPEKA, KS...................................................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ TYBEE ISLAND, GA................................................................ $206,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA...................................................... $386,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ.................................... $658,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA............................................ $203,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN............................... $271,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR..................................... $240,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK.............................................................. $450,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT.................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GENERAL INVESTIGATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES............................. ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES........................................ ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ACCESS TO WATER DATA (TECH ASSIST--SEC 2017 WRDA 2007)...................... $750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS................................................. $4,730,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES............................................... $8,051,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Arizona Department of Water Resources, AZ.................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ City of Los Angeles, CA.................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ City of Palmdale, CA....................................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Los Angeles County, CA..................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ San Bernadino County, CA................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ San Manuel Band of Indians, CA............................................. $66,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Soboba Band of Indians, CA................................................. $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ West Canal/Willow Brook Flood Management Study, New Britain, CT............ $20,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ South Bethany Tidal Pump System Study, DE.................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Effingham County Storm Water Management Plan, GA........................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Northwest GA Watershead, GA................................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Nishnabotna Watershed, IA.................................................. $341,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Willow Creek, IA........................................................... $45,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Big Wood River--Belvue Idaho, ID........................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Weiser R. Floodplain Analysis, ID.......................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ KS River Water Resources, KS............................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS Tribal Support, KS..................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Bardstown, KY.............................................................. $88,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Louisville Parks, KY....................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Chitimacha Watershed Planning, LA.......................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ New Orleans River Park, LA................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Port of Lake Charles Master Plan, LA....................................... $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ River Parishes Pedestrian Plan, LA......................................... $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ St. Johns Parish Monumentation, LA......................................... $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Tunica Recreation Trail, Tunica-Biloxi Tribe, LA........................... $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Penn's Hill Drainage Study, Quincy, MA..................................... $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Town Line Brook Drainage Assessment, Malden, MA............................ $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Montgomery County, MD...................................................... $20,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Macomb County Drain Mapping & Database, MI................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Stream Characteristics Study for Saganing River, MI........................ $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Cape Girardeau Groundwater Study, MO....................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ City of Marquand Flood Study, MO........................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS MO MDNR Northwest Missouri, MO......................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Peruque Creek Water Quality, MO............................................ $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ St Charles Riverfront Micro-Model, MO...................................... $90,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Henry R Dam, Burke, Co., NC................................................ $48,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Goochs Milll, Grnadville, Co., NC.......................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Fontenelle/Bellevue, NE.................................................... $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Spicket River Watershed Study, NH.......................................... $55,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Grants Drainage Management Plan, NM........................................ $56,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Tarrytown, NY.............................................................. $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Town of Clarence, NY....................................................... $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Wappingers Falls, NY....................................................... $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Harpersfield Dam, Grand River, OH.......................................... $88,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ State of Ohio GIS, OH...................................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS Boone Nute Slough, OR.................................................. $27,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS City of Medford Floodplain, OR......................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS Nehalem River ODOT Flood Mapping, OR................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS Portland Balanced Cut and Fill Study, OR............................... $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PAS Toutle River Radio Tracking, OR........................................ $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Allegheny Co Aquatic Assessment Study, PA.................................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Northern Allegheny Co Stormwater Mangt Study, PA........................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Pennsylvania Flood Inundation Mapping, PA.................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SW PA Spill Response Study, PA............................................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ USS Yorktown, SC........................................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Kingsport Riverfront, TN................................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ TN Dept of Env and Conserv Pilot Study--Wtr Res Tech ADVISORY Committee, TN $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Charlottesville Water Quality Management, VA............................... $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ James City Surry Non-Structural, VA........................................ $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Virginia Department of Transportation, VA.................................. $114,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Williamsburg Stormwater Management, VA..................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ South Burlington, VT....................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Clover Island--Port of Kenewick, WA........................................ $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Elwha River, WA............................................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Half Moon Lake Alum Dosing Study, WI....................................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Internal Phosphorus Loading Assessment Study, Big Eau Pleine Flowage, WI... $31,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Oneida Nation Floodplain Delineation, WI................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ City of Ravenwood, WV...................................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Putnam County Drainage, WV................................................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA.............................................. ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRI-CADD.............................. $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION............................................... $6,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES.................................................. $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ FLOOD DAMAGE DATA........................................................... $220,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES............................................. $13,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Mobile District Hurricane Evacuation Studies, AL........................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Special Study--Crowdabout Creek, AL........................................ $81,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--SFHE Montgomery Al, Little Sandy Creek, AL............................. $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Beaver/Clear Creeks, Camp Verde, AZ.................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Cochise County, AZ..................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Gila River/Duncan, AZ.................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Hopi Tribe Floodplain Mapping, AZ...................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Tohono O'odham Gu Vo Wash, AZ.......................................... $95,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Tohono O'odham Nationwide Floodplain Maopping, AZ...................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Humboldt County, CA Tsunami PAS, CA........................................ $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Raymond Basin Conjunctive Use Drought Study, CA............................ $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ San Mateo County, CA Levee Survey, CA...................................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Anaverde Creek Floodplain Delineation, CA.............................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Soboba Band of Indians Flood Mapping, CA............................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Carbon County, CO.......................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Durango, LaPlata County, CO................................................ $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Green River City, CO....................................................... $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ La Plata County, CO........................................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Mesa County, CO............................................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Flood/Hurricane Evacuation, DC............................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Savannah District Hurricane Evac Studies, GA............................... $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--GA Clarksville Stream Survey, GA....................................... $20,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Anahola Flood Hazard Study, Kauai, HI...................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Kaluanui Stream Flood Hazard Determination, Oahu, HI State Parks, DLNR..... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Nuuanu Reservoir Flood Study, HI........................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Waimea River Zone A Flood Determination, Kauai, HI......................... $185,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Waiohuli Gulch Flood Hazard Study, Kula, Maui, HI.......................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Evaluation of Flooding Scenarios, IA................................... $120,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Regulated Frequency Curves............................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Boulder Creek Donnelly, ID............................................. $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Warm Springs Creek vic of Challis, ID.................................. $38,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Warm Springs Creek vic of Ketchum, ID.................................. $45,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--IL Levees Evaluation Support, IL....................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Will County Survey, IL..................................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Nodaway County Bridge Study, KS............................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Hurricane Evacuation Study, SE Louisiana Update Support Data............... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--City of Gretna GIS, LA................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--East Baton Rouge GIS, LA............................................... $450,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Livingston Parish GIS, LA.............................................. $650,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Clay Pit Brook Flooding Study, MA.......................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Hoosic River Flood Mitigation Study, Cheshire, MA.......................... $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Saw Mill Brook Flood Study, Newton, MA..................................... $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Spear Brook Flood Control Study, Wilbraham, MA............................. $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Hurricane Evacuation Studies, MD........................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ AuTrain River Scour Study, MI, MI.......................................... $71,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Floodplain Management Training, MO......................................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Lincoln County, MO..................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Jordan, MT................................................................. $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Nashua Flood Risk Assessment, MT........................................... $55,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ North Carolina HES Restudy, NC............................................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Beaver & Black Brooks Flooding Study, Londerry, NH......................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Manalapan Brook, NJ.................................................... $110,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Elbow Creek, NY............................................................ $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Forecast Studies, NY....................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Hurricane Evacuation Studies, NY........................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Onondaga Creek, Syracuse, NY............................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Special Study--Finger Lakes, NY............................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ New Jersey--Port Authority Study Update, NY, NJ............................ $180,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Special Study--Crawford County, OH......................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS City of John Day, OR.................................................... $160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Crooked River FIS (City of Prineville), OR.............................. $140,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Juniper Canyon FIS (City of Prineville), OR............................. $137,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #1 (Gray's River), OR.................................. $155,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #2 (Elochoman River), OR............................... $130,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #3 (Wilson Creek), OR.................................. $128,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #4 (Skamokawa Creek), OR............................... $128,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Philadelphia Hurricane Evacuation Study, PA................................ $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Southeastern, PA........................................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Puerto Rico HES Behavior Study, PR......................................... $112,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ South Carolina HES Restudy, SC............................................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--City of Gallatin, TN................................................... $85,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Unincorparated Weber Co., UT............................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ City of Galax, VA.......................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Town of Abingdon, VA................................................... $56,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Dam Break Studies, VT...................................................... $31,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ East Long Pond Dam, VT..................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Lake Hardwick Dam, VT...................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Mackville Pond Dam, VT..................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Nichols Pond Dam, VT....................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Rugg Brooks, St. Albans City, VT........................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Stevens Brooks, Town of St. Albans, VT................................. $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS--Vermont, VT............................................................ $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Warren Lake Dam, VT........................................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS Lind Coulee, vicinity of Lind, WA....................................... $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SS McCoy Creek, vicinity of Oakesdale, WA.................................. $67,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ Bear River Study--Uinta Co., WY............................................ $140,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HYDROLOGIC STUDIES.......................................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE)............................ $225,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT...................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)...................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS...................................................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........................................................ $25,392,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ OTHER--MISC..................................................................... ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT....................................................... $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW..................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ NATIONAL SHORELINE.......................................................... $375,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM.................................................... $2,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY............................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--CG.......................... Channel Improvement, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, NO, TH................................. $47,721,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--CG.......................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................... $45,439,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--CG.......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.......................................... $3,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--CG.......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA........................................................... $15,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--CG.......................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA.................................................... $2,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--GI.......................... ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA...................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--GI.......................... DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA.................................................. $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--GI.......................... MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT STUDY, TN & MS............................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--GI.......................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA.............................................. $1,665,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................................ $67,350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR.............................................. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR............................................... $425,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR............................................ $223,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR............................................ $175,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................... $11,708,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR....................................................... $1,217,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL............................................... $191,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY............................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.......................................... $2,532,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA........................................................... $12,374,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA............................................. $43,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA.............................................. $54,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. BONNET CARRE, LA................................................................ $3,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA............................................... $1,716,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA........................................ $1,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. OLD RIVER, LA................................................................... $10,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA.......................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA.................................. $2,485,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA........................................... $3,660,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS........................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS............................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS............................................................ $537,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS................................................. $6,870,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS............................................ $2,400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS...................................................... $7,640,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS...................................................... $807,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS................................................... $7,381,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS...................................................... $2,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS.................................................... $9,183,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS.................................................... $825,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS.................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS........................................... $544,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS..................................................... $731,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO............................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO...................................................... $9,843,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO............................................................. $5,416,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN............................................... $45,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN............................................... $1,417,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T--Maintenance................. MAPPING......................................................................... $1,112,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Abiquiu Dam, NM................................................................. $3,305,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Alabama-Coosa Comprehensive Water Study, AL..................................... $253,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Alabama River Lakes, AL......................................................... $16,785,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Alamo Lake, AZ.................................................................. $1,542,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Albeni Falls Dam, ID............................................................ $1,545,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Allatoona Lake, GA.............................................................. $7,077,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Allegheny River, PA............................................................. $9,039,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Almond Lake, NY................................................................. $524,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Alum Creek Lake, OH............................................................. $1,545,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA........................................................... $659,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Anchorage Harbor, AK............................................................ $18,659,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, GA, AL & FL....................... $2,437,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Applegate Lake, OR.............................................................. $1,302,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Aquilla Lake, TX................................................................ $1,564,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Arcadia Lake, OK................................................................ $521,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control--Area VIII, TX....................... $1,558,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Arkport Dam, NY................................................................. $298,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ashtabula Harbor, OH............................................................ $1,840,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Assateague, MD.................................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf & Black, LA........................... $11,640,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway--ACC, VA......................................... $2,620,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway--DSC, VA......................................... $1,311,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, GA.............................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, NC.............................................. $4,300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, SC.............................................. $1,295,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA....................................................... $215,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC.............................................. $1,898,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ball Mountain, VT............................................................... $858,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Baltimore Harbor and Channel (50 Foot), MD...................................... $20,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Baltimore Harbor, MD (Drift Removal)............................................ $360,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Barataria Bay Waterway, LA...................................................... $165,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Barbers Point Harbor, HI........................................................ $201,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bardwell Lake, TX............................................................... $2,229,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Barkley Dam and Lake, Barkley, KY & TN.......................................... $10,393,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Barnegat Inlet, NJ.............................................................. $225,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Barre Falls Dam, MA............................................................. $753,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Barren River Lake, KY........................................................... $2,514,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA...................................................... $954,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump Waterway, LA................................. $1,211,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayou Pierre, LA................................................................ $24,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA..................................................... $49,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayou Teche and Vermillion River, LA............................................ $15,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayou Teche, LA................................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bayport Ship Channel, TX........................................................ $4,968,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bear Creek Lake, CO............................................................. $395,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Beaver Lake, AR................................................................. $8,864,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Beech Fork Lake, WV............................................................. $1,405,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Belton Lake, TX................................................................. $3,280,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Beltzville Lake, PA............................................................. $1,201,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Benbrook Lake, TX............................................................... $2,575,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Berlin Lake, OH................................................................. $2,198,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Big Bend Dam, Lake Sharpe, SD................................................... $9,873,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Big Sandy Harbor, KY............................................................ $1,710,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bigstone Lake--Whetstone River, MN & SD......................................... $276,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Biloxi Harbor, MS............................................................... $1,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Birch Hill Dam, MA.............................................................. $1,203,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Birch Lake, OK.................................................................. $902,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Black Butte Lake, CA............................................................ $2,234,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY..................................... $1,503,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Black Rock Lake, CT............................................................. $1,436,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL.......................................... $24,180,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Blackwater Dam, NH.............................................................. $610,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Blakely Mt Dam, Lake Ouachita, AR............................................... $7,079,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Blue Marsh Lake, PA............................................................. $2,696,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Blue Mountain Lake, AR.......................................................... $1,914,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Blue River Lake, OR............................................................. $940,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bluestone Lake, WV.............................................................. $1,661,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bonneville Lock & Dam, OR & WA.................................................. $13,911,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Boston Harbor, MA............................................................... $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bowman Haley, ND................................................................ $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Brazos Island Harbor, TX........................................................ $3,388,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Broken Bow Lake, OK............................................................. $3,202,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Brookville Lake, IN............................................................. $862,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Brunswick Harbor, GA............................................................ $7,156,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buchanan Dam, HV Eastman Lake, CA............................................... $2,041,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buckhorn Lake, KY............................................................... $1,585,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buffalo Bayou & Tributaries, TX................................................. $2,958,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buffalo Harbor, NY.............................................................. $1,325,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buffumville Lake, MA............................................................ $836,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buford Dam and Lake Sidney Lanier, GA........................................... $8,924,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Bull Shoals Lake, AR............................................................ $14,484,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Burns Waterway Harbor, IN....................................................... $165,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Burnsville Lake, WV............................................................. $2,246,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Buttermilk Channel, NY.......................................................... $1,760,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Caddo Lake, LA.................................................................. $224,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Caesar Creek Lake, OH........................................................... $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cagles Mill Lake, IN............................................................ $892,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Calcasieu River and Pass, LA.................................................... $23,968,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Calumet Harbor and River, IL & IN............................................... $4,621,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Canaveral Harbor, FL............................................................ $4,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Canton Lake, OK................................................................. $2,217,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Canyon Lake, TX................................................................. $4,005,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cape Cod Canal, MA.............................................................. $13,263,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cape Fear River Above Wilmington, NC............................................ $988,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ............................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Carlyle Lake, IL................................................................ $5,171,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Carr Creek Lake, KY............................................................. $1,737,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Carters Dam and Lake, GA........................................................ $8,318,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Caruthersville Harbor, MO....................................................... $800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cave Run Lake, KY............................................................... $926,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN........................................................ $1,027,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cedar Bayou, TX................................................................. $1,790,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Center Hill Lake, TN............................................................ $6,143,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Central & Southern Florida, FL.................................................. $23,876,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Channel To Harlingen, TX........................................................ $2,161,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Channel To Port Bolivar, TX..................................................... $383,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Channels in Lake St Clair, MI................................................... $1,636,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Charles River Natural Valley Storage Area, MA................................... $275,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Charleston Harbor, SC........................................................... $12,492,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Charlevoix Harbor, MI........................................................... $203,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chatfield Lake, CO.............................................................. $1,442,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN....................................................... $6,454,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chena River Lakes, AK........................................................... $2,816,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cherry Creek Lake, CO........................................................... $1,999,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chetco River, OR................................................................ $909,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chicago Harbor, IL.............................................................. $3,889,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chicago River, IL............................................................... $493,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chickamauga Lock, Tennessee River, TN........................................... $3,775,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chief Joseph Dam, WA............................................................ $790,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Chincoteague Inlet, VA.......................................................... $913,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Lake, MO..................................... $6,813,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Clarence J. Brown Dam, OH....................................................... $1,145,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Clearwater Lake, MO............................................................. $3,018,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cleveland Harbor, OH............................................................ $8,357,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Clinton Lake, KS................................................................ $2,073,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cochiti Lake, NM................................................................ $6,876,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cold Brook Lake, SD............................................................. $436,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cold Spring Inlet, NJ........................................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Colebrook River Lake, CT........................................................ $615,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Columbia & Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA & Portland, OR............ $24,495,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA & OR............................................ $727,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Columbia River at the Mouth, OR & WA............................................ $12,945,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Columbia River Between Chinook and Sand Island, WA.............................. $847,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA & the Dalles, OR........................... $689,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Conant Brook Lake, MA........................................................... $210,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Conchas Lake, NM................................................................ $1,796,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Conemaugh River Lake, PA........................................................ $1,253,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Conneaut Harbor, OH............................................................. $1,191,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC............................................. $4,685,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Coos Bay, OR.................................................................... $5,043,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Copan Lake, OK.................................................................. $1,035,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Coquille River, OR.............................................................. $339,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Coralville Lake, IA............................................................. $3,381,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir, TN.............................................. $6,813,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX................................................. $4,523,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cottage Grove Lake, OR.......................................................... $1,130,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cottonwood Springs Lake, SD..................................................... $271,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cougar Lake, OR................................................................. $1,582,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Council Grave Lake, KS.......................................................... $1,739,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cowanesque Lake, PA............................................................. $1,889,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, CA........................................... $3,829,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Crooked Creek Lake, PA.......................................................... $1,683,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV................................................. $177,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Curwensville Lake, PA........................................................... $757,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dale Hollow Lake, TN............................................................ $6,386,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dardanelle Lock & Dam, AR....................................................... $9,754,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Deer Creek Lake, OH............................................................. $1,481,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DeGray Lake, AR................................................................. $7,003,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach, DE...................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Delaware Lake, OH............................................................... $1,322,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Delaware River at Camden, NJ.................................................... $15,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Delaware River, Philadelphia to the Sea, NJ, PA & DE............................ $19,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ................................. $820,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Denison Dam, Lake Texoma, TX & OK............................................... $7,676,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DeQueen Lake, AR................................................................ $1,752,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Detroit Lake, OR................................................................ $949,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Detroit River, MI............................................................... $5,415,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dewey Lake, KY.................................................................. $1,775,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dierks Lake, AR................................................................. $1,360,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dillingham Harbor, AK........................................................... $885,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dillon Lake, OH................................................................. $1,366,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Disposal Area Monitoring, ME.................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dorena Lake, OR................................................................. $1,160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA..................................... $5,139,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI................................................. $5,985,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Dworkshak Dam and Reservoir, ID................................................. $2,875,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East Branch Clarion River Lake, PA.............................................. $1,524,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East Brimfield Lake, MA......................................................... $950,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East Fork, Tombigbee River, MS.................................................. $187,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East Lynn Lake, WV.............................................................. $2,167,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East River, NY.................................................................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East Rockaway Inlet, NY......................................................... $2,950,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... East Sidney Lake, NY............................................................ $588,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Eastchester Creek, NY........................................................... $4,090,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Eau Galle River Lake, WI........................................................ $888,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ediz Hook, WA................................................................... $730,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Edward MacDowell Lake, NH....................................................... $560,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... El Dorado Lake, KS.............................................................. $786,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Elk City Lake, KS............................................................... $718,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Elkins, WV...................................................................... $15,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Elvis Stahr (Hickman) Harbor, KY................................................ $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Erie Harbor, PA................................................................. $555,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, FL................................................. $56,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Estelline Springs Experimental Project, TX...................................... $43,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Eufaula Lake, OK................................................................ $6,620,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA.......................................... $1,766,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fall Creek Lake, OR............................................................. $1,864,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fall River Lake, KS............................................................. $1,283,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Falls Lake, NC.................................................................. $1,859,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Farm Creek Reservoirs, IL....................................................... $352,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Farmington Dam, CA.............................................................. $481,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fern Ridge Lake, OR............................................................. $2,362,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fernandina Harbor, FL........................................................... $1,625,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ferrells Bridge Dam, Lake O' the Pines, TX...................................... $3,485,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY............................................ $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fishtrap Lake, KY............................................................... $2,171,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Flushing Bay and Creek, NY...................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fort Gibson Lake, OK............................................................ $11,768,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD......................................... $12,210,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fort Supply Lake, OK............................................................ $1,104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA.................................................... $674,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, RI................................................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Fox River, WI................................................................... $4,421,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Francis E Walter Dam, PA........................................................ $969,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Franklin Falls Dam, NH.......................................................... $1,921,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Freeport Harbor, TX............................................................. $3,316,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Freshwater Bayou, LA............................................................ $2,235,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Friday Harbor, WA............................................................... $111,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ft. Peck Dam and Lake, MT....................................................... $6,361,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Galisteo Dam, NM................................................................ $591,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX................................................ $13,095,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND................................................ $14,946,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA............................................... $2,323,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gavins Point Dam, Lewis and Clark Lake, NE and SD............................... $8,165,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA...................................... $224,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Georgetown Harbor, SC........................................................... $1,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gillham Lake, AR................................................................ $1,366,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GIWW, Channel to Victoria, TX................................................... $2,264,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GIWW, Chocolate Bayou, TX....................................................... $1,733,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Grand Haven Harbor, MI.......................................................... $820,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Granger Dam and Lake, TX........................................................ $2,588,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Grapevine Lake, TX.............................................................. $2,735,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA............................................. $11,140,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Grayson Lake, KY................................................................ $1,709,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Great Kills Harbor, S.I., NY.................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Great Salt Plains Lake, OK...................................................... $347,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (New Harbor).................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Great South Bay, NY............................................................. $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Green and Barren Rivers, KY..................................................... $1,880,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Green Bay Harbor, WI............................................................ $6,459,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Green Peter--Foster Lakes, OR................................................... $3,650,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Green River Lake, KY............................................................ $2,202,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Greers Ferry Lake, AR........................................................... $7,759,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, AL.................................................. $5,735,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, LA.................................................. $24,777,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX.................................................. $26,046,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Gulfport Harbor, MS............................................................. $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hampton Rds, Norfolk and Newport News Harbor, VA (Drift Removal)................ $882,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hancock Brook Lake, CT.......................................................... $442,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Harlan County Lake, NE.......................................................... $2,312,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Harry S Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO............................................ $9,393,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hartwell Lake, GA & SC.......................................................... $11,999,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Helena Harbor, AR............................................................... $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Heyburn Lake, OK................................................................ $748,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hidden Dam, Hensley Lake, CA.................................................... $2,170,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hills Creek Lake, OR............................................................ $843,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hillsdale Lake, KS.............................................................. $860,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hodges Village Dam, MA.......................................................... $567,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Holland Harbor, MI.............................................................. $2,151,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Homer Harbor, AK................................................................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Homme Lake, ND.................................................................. $252,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hop Brook Lake, CT.............................................................. $917,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH..................................................... $1,148,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hords Creek Lake, TX............................................................ $1,605,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Houma Navigation Canal, LA...................................................... $2,569,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Houston Ship Channel, TX........................................................ $15,063,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Howard Hanson Dam, WA........................................................... $3,694,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hudson River Channel, NY........................................................ $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hudson River, NY (MAINT)........................................................ $1,270,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hudson River, NY (O & C)........................................................ $1,550,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hugo Lake, OK................................................................... $1,738,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Hulah Lake, OK.................................................................. $2,097,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA..................................................... $3,010,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ice Harbor Lock & Dam, WA....................................................... $5,828,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Illinois Waterway, IL & IN (MVR Portion)........................................ $2,648,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Illinois Waterway, Il & IN (MVS Portion)........................................ $31,736,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Indiana Harbor, Confined Disposal Facility, IN.................................. $13,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Indiana Harbor, IN.............................................................. $2,330,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, GA.............................. $48,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, IL.............................. $65,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, OR.............................. $34,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, WA.............................. $74,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, WV.............................. $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, AK............................................... $168,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, AR............................................... $673,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, AZ............................................... $199,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, CA............................................... $6,702,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, CO............................................... $773,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, CT............................................... $392,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, DC............................................... $140,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, FL............................................... $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, GA............................................... $108,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, HI............................................... $705,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, IA............................................... $483,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, ID............................................... $324,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, IL............................................... $1,298,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, IN............................................... $709,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, KS............................................... $220,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, KY............................................... $665,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, LA............................................... $1,487,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MA............................................... $414,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MD............................................... $155,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, ME............................................... $215,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MI............................................... $158,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MN............................................... $633,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MO............................................... $1,491,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MS............................................... $183,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, MT............................................... $115,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NC............................................... $244,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, ND............................................... $452,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NE............................................... $714,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NH............................................... $126,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NJ............................................... $205,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NM............................................... $639,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NV............................................... $63,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, NY............................................... $898,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, OH............................................... $555,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, OK............................................... $255,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, OR............................................... $636,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, PA............................................... $880,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, RI............................................... $48,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, SC............................................... $70,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, SD............................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, TN............................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, TX............................................... $1,520,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, UT............................................... $84,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, VA............................................... $369,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, VT............................................... $109,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, WA............................................... $725,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, WI............................................... $91,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, WV............................................... $336,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Inspection of Completed Works, WY............................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... International Water Studies, ME................................................. $17,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL................ $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware R to Chesapeake Bay, DE & MD.................... $28,390,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL................................ $689,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Intracoastal Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE......................... $70,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Isabella Lake, CA............................................................... $1,802,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, LA................................................ $13,598,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. Edward Roush Lake, IN........................................................ $944,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, TN........................................... $4,818,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. Strom Thurmond Lake, GA & SC................................................. $10,316,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jackson Hole Levees, WY......................................................... $877,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jacksonville Harbor, FL......................................................... $7,035,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jamaica Bay, NY................................................................. $220,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... James River Channel, VA......................................................... $4,479,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jemez Canyon Dam, NM............................................................ $756,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jennings Randolph Lake, MD & WV................................................. $1,779,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jim Chapman Lake, TX............................................................ $1,718,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Lake Seminole, FL, AL & GA........................... $9,732,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Joe Pool Lake, TX............................................................... $1,096,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... John Day Lock & Dam, OR & WA.................................................... $8,901,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... John H. Kerr Lake, VA & NC...................................................... $11,585,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... John Martin Reservoir, CO....................................................... $2,554,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS.............................................. $3,685,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, VA......................................... $2,104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Johnstown, PA................................................................... $34,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Jones Inlet, NY................................................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kanawha River Locks & Dam, WV................................................... $14,089,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kanopolis Lake, KS.............................................................. $2,288,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kaskaskia River Navigation, IL.................................................. $2,148,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kaw Lake, OK.................................................................... $2,751,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kentucky River, KY.............................................................. $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kewaunee Harbor, WI............................................................. $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Keweenaw Waterway, MI........................................................... $37,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Keystone Lake, OK............................................................... $6,947,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA.......................................... $1,338,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Knightville Dam, MA............................................................. $1,421,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAC Qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN........................................ $627,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, ND............................................. $1,351,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Kemp, TX................................................................... $327,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Michigan Diversion, IL..................................................... $683,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Montauk Harbor, NY......................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Providence Harbor, LA...................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Shelbyville, IL............................................................ $5,454,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Traverse, SD & MN.......................................................... $598,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA.................................................. $9,246,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Laurel River Lake, KY........................................................... $1,927,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lavon Lake, TX.................................................................. $3,497,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lewisville Dam, TX.............................................................. $3,549,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Libby Dam, MT................................................................... $1,948,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Little Blue River Lakes, MO..................................................... $845,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Little Goose Lock & Dam, WA..................................................... $2,551,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY..................................................... $5,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Littleville Lake, MA............................................................ $889,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Long Branch Lake, MO............................................................ $949,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, NY........................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Long Island Sound DMMP, CT...................................................... $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lookout Point Lake, OR.......................................................... $2,766,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lorain Harbor, OH............................................................... $880,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA............................................ $4,597,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lost Creek Lake, OR............................................................. $3,636,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, NJ...................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lower Granite Lock & Dam, WA.................................................... $7,651,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lower Monumental Lock & Dam, WA................................................. $6,735,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Loyalhanna Lake, PA............................................................. $1,346,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lucky Peak Lake, ID............................................................. $2,597,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Lynnhaven Inlet, VA............................................................. $277,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Madison Parish Port, LA......................................................... $99,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mahoning Creek Lake, PA......................................................... $1,286,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Manasquan River, NJ............................................................. $160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT....................................................... $861,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC..................................................... $3,945,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Marion Lake, KS................................................................. $1,820,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Martins Fork Lake, KY........................................................... $814,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Martis Creek Lake, CA & NV...................................................... $1,192,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Masonboro Inlet and Connecting Channels, NC..................................... $2,300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Massillon Local Protection Project, OH.......................................... $37,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Matagorda Ship Channel, TX...................................................... $4,627,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mattituck Harbor, NY............................................................ $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR............................. $40,016,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK............................. $6,173,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... McNary Lock & Dam, OR & WA...................................................... $7,137,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Melvern Lake, KS................................................................ $2,151,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Merced County Streams, CA....................................................... $451,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mermentau River, LA............................................................. $1,913,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, OH......................................... $1,089,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Pro.......................... $3,150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Middlesboro Cumberland River Basin, KY.......................................... $113,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Milford Lake, KS................................................................ $2,057,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mill Creek Lake, WA............................................................. $3,834,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Millwood Lake, AR............................................................... $5,122,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Minnesota River, MN............................................................. $256,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mispillion River, DE............................................................ $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississinewa Lake, IN........................................................... $974,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi Flood Control, OH................................................... $1,727,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis (MVP Portion), MN...... $44,130,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis (MVR Portion), IL...... $58,714,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi River BTWN Missouri River and Minneapolis (MVS Portion), IL......... $22,227,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi River btwn the Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Reg Works), MO & IL........ $23,403,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi River Outlets at Venice, LA......................................... $2,838,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA........................ $54,994,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Missouri River--Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA............................. $129,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Missouri River--Rulo to the Mouth, IA, KS, MO & NE.............................. $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Missouri River--Sioux City to Rulo, IA, KS, MO & NE............................. $2,610,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mobile Harbor, AL............................................................... $23,996,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mojave River Dam, CA............................................................ $288,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Monongahela River, PA........................................................... $16,758,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Monroe Lake, IN................................................................. $1,101,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Morehead City Harbor, NC........................................................ $9,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Moriches Inlet, NY.............................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Morro Bay Harbor, CA............................................................ $3,300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mosquito Creek Lake, OH......................................................... $995,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mount Morris Dam, NY............................................................ $2,696,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mouth of Yazoo River, MS........................................................ $112,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA............................................. $279,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mud Mountain Dam, WA............................................................ $3,056,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Murderkill River, DE............................................................ $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Muskingum River Lakes, OH....................................................... $7,306,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Mystic River, CT................................................................ $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Narrows Dam, Lake Greeson, AR................................................... $5,005,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Narrows of Lake Champlain, VT & NY.............................................. $85,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Navarro Mills Lake, TX.......................................................... $4,168,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Neah Bay, WA.................................................................... $67,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, MA............................................ $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Bedford Fairhaven and Acushnet Hurricane Barrier, MA........................ $619,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Hogan Lake, CA.............................................................. $2,515,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, NJ............................................ $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Madrid Harbor (Mile 889), MO................................................ $240,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Madrid Harbor, MO........................................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New Melones Lake, Downstream Channel, CA........................................ $1,898,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New River Inlet, NC............................................................. $700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New York and New Jersey Channels, NY............................................ $4,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New York Harbor, NY............................................................. $3,698,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New York Harbor, NY & NJ (Drift Removal)........................................ $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... New York Harbor, NY & NJ (Prevention of Obstructive Deposits)................... $1,045,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, NJ................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Newport Bay Harbor, CA.......................................................... $1,780,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Newtown Creek, NY............................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Nimrod Lake, AR................................................................. $2,289,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Nolin Lake, KY.................................................................. $2,477,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Nome Harbor, AK................................................................. $820,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Norfolk Harbor, VA.............................................................. $11,343,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Norfork Lake, AR................................................................ $5,717,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... North Branch Kokosing River Lake, OH............................................ $274,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA.............................................. $630,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... North Hartland Lake, VT......................................................... $772,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown, TX................................... $2,382,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... North Springfield Lake, VT...................................................... $854,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Northfield Brook Lake, CT....................................................... $610,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... O C Fisher Dam and Lake, TX..................................................... $1,164,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Oahe Dam, Lake Oahe, SD & ND.................................................... $11,816,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Oakland Harbor, CA.............................................................. $9,255,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Oceanside Harbor, CA............................................................ $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ohio River Locks and Dams, KY, IL, IN & OH...................................... $40,748,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ohio River Locks and Dams, PA, OH & WV.......................................... $21,470,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ohio River Locks and Dams, WV, KY & OH.......................................... $35,276,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ohio River Open Channel Work, KY, IL, IN & OH................................... $5,836,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ohio River Open Channel Work, PA, OH & WV....................................... $516,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ohio River Open Channel Work, WV, KY & OH....................................... $2,996,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Okatibbee Lake, MS.............................................................. $1,703,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Okeechobee Waterway, FL......................................................... $2,357,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN.................................................... $12,304,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ontonagon Harbor, MI............................................................ $1,122,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Oologah Lake, OK................................................................ $4,106,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Optima Lake, OK................................................................. $219,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Orwell Lake, MN................................................................. $533,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Osceola Harbor, AR.............................................................. $800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Otter Brook Lake, NH............................................................ $553,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA............................................ $9,605,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam, AR................................................ $5,725,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Paint Creek Lake, OH............................................................ $1,216,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Painted Rock Dam, AZ............................................................ $1,320,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Paintsville Lake, KY............................................................ $1,231,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Palm Beach Harbor, FL........................................................... $3,225,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Panama City Harbor, FL.......................................................... $2,055,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Papillion Creek, NE............................................................. $847,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pascagoula Harbor, MS........................................................... $10,900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Passaic River Flood Warning System, NJ.......................................... $553,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pat Mayse Lake, TX.............................................................. $1,208,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Patoka Lake, IN................................................................. $887,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pearl River, MS & LA............................................................ $193,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pearson-Skubitz Bill Hill Lake, KS.............................................. $1,472,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pensacola Harbor, FL............................................................ $67,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pensacola Reservoir, Lake of the Cherokees, OK.................................. $114,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Perry Lake, KS.................................................................. $2,015,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Philpott Lake, VA & NC.......................................................... $5,638,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pine and Mathews Canyons Lakes, NV.............................................. $341,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pine Creek Lake, OK............................................................. $1,276,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pine Flat Lake, CA.............................................................. $3,201,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pipestem Lake, ND............................................................... $496,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Plymouth Harbor, MA............................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Point Judith Harbor of Refuge, RI............................................... $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pomme De Terre Lake, MO......................................................... $2,231,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Pomona Lake, KS................................................................. $2,047,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ponce De Leon Inlet, FL......................................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Poplar Island, MD............................................................... $8,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Port Chester Harbor, NY......................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Port Orford, OR................................................................. $38,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, NH...................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Potomac and Anacostia River, DC (Drift Removal)................................. $805,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Presque Isle Harbor, MI......................................................... $335,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Proctor Lake, TX................................................................ $2,324,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, AK................................................... $930,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, AL................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, CA................................................... $2,442,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, CT................................................... $1,050,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, DC................................................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, DE................................................... $105,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, FL................................................... $1,300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, GA................................................... $151,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, HI................................................... $570,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, IL................................................... $104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, IN................................................... $185,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, LA................................................... $65,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, MA................................................... $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, MD................................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, ME................................................... $750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, MI................................................... $410,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, MN................................................... $82,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, MS................................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, NC................................................... $295,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, NH................................................... $275,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, NJ................................................... $1,653,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, NY................................................... $2,123,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, OH................................................... $295,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, OR................................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, PA................................................... $120,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, RI................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, SC................................................... $465,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, TX................................................... $223,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, VA................................................... $850,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, WA................................................... $524,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Project Condition Surveys, WI................................................... $283,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Prompton Lake, PA............................................................... $434,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Puget Sound and Tributary Waters, WA............................................ $1,011,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Punxsutawney, PA................................................................ $22,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Quillayute River, WA............................................................ $266,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... R D Bailey Lake, WV............................................................. $1,927,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-off, NJ........................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Raritan River, NJ............................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rathbun Lake, IA................................................................ $3,019,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ray Roberts Lake, TX............................................................ $1,324,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Raystown Lake, PA............................................................... $3,847,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Red Lake Reservoir, MN.......................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Red Rock Dam and Lake, Red Rock, IA............................................. $4,567,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Redwood City Harbor............................................................. $6,745,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Removal of Aquatic Growth, FL................................................... $4,445,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA................................................... $1,410,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Removal of Aquatic Growth, VA................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rend Lake, IL................................................................... $5,386,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN............................... $3,398,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Richard B Russell Dam & Lake, GA & SC........................................... $9,209,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Richmond Harbor, CA............................................................. $9,589,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Robert S. Keer Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK................................... $8,441,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rochester Harbor, NY............................................................ $5,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rogue River at Gold Beach, OR................................................... $565,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rollinson Channel, NC........................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rosedale Harbor, MS............................................................. $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Roseville Local Protection Project, OH.......................................... $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rough River Lake, KY............................................................ $2,742,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Rudee Inlet, VA................................................................. $795,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX...................................................... $13,399,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sacramento River (30 Foot Project), CA.......................................... $3,351,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sacramento River and Tributaries (Debris Control), CA........................... $1,712,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sacramento River Shallow Draft Channel, CA...................................... $234,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Saginaw River, MI............................................................... $3,624,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Salamonie Lake, IN.............................................................. $904,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Salem River, NJ................................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE.................................................. $1,079,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX............................................... $6,247,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... San Francisco Bay, Delta Model Structure, CA.................................... $1,118,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Drift Removal)................................ $2,945,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... San Francisco Harbor, CA........................................................ $3,237,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... San Joaquin River, Port of Stockton, CA......................................... $3,554,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... San Juan Harbor, PR............................................................. $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA........................................ $2,650,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sandusky Harbor, OH............................................................. $1,465,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Santa Ana River Basin, CA....................................................... $3,094,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Santa Barbara Harbor, CA........................................................ $1,690,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM..................................................... $1,099,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sardis Lake, OK................................................................. $1,254,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Savannah Harbor, GA............................................................. $15,087,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Savannah River Below Augusta, GA................................................ $574,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Saylorville Lake, IA............................................................ $5,032,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, AZ............................................. $31,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, CA............................................. $1,915,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, CO............................................. $612,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, FL............................................. $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, ID............................................. $484,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, KS............................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, MD............................................. $108,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, MO............................................. $327,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, MT............................................. $145,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, ND............................................. $138,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, NM............................................. $477,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, OK............................................. $900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, OR............................................. $69,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, PA............................................. $59,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, SD............................................. $81,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, TX............................................. $149,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, UT............................................. $594,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, WA............................................. $537,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Scheduling Reservoir Operations, WY............................................. $118,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Schuylkill River, PA............................................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Seattle Harbor, WA.............................................................. $172,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sebewaing River, MI............................................................. $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Shark River, NJ................................................................. $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Shenango River Lake, PA......................................................... $6,992,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Shinnecock Inlet, NY............................................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, NJ.............................................. $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Silver Lake Harbor, NC.......................................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Siuslaw River, OR............................................................... $647,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Skiatook Lake, OK............................................................... $1,414,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Skipanon Channel, OR............................................................ $6,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Smithville Lake, MO............................................................. $1,850,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Somerville Lake, TX............................................................. $3,366,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Souris River, ND................................................................ $286,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Southern New York Flood Control Projects, NY.................................... $807,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... St. Clair River, MI............................................................. $533,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... St. Joseph Harbor, MI........................................................... $755,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... St. Marys River, MI............................................................. $23,010,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... St. Lucie Inlet, Fl............................................................. $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Stamford Hurricane Barrier, CT.................................................. $434,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Stillaguamish River, WA......................................................... $165,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX....................................................... $2,096,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Stillwater Lake, PA............................................................. $452,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Stockton Lake, MO............................................................... $4,370,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV...................................................... $1,148,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sturgeon Bay Harbor and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI............................ $20,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Success Lake, CA................................................................ $1,989,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Suisun Bay Channel, CA.......................................................... $4,019,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Summersville Lake, WV........................................................... $3,234,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surry Mountain Lake, NH......................................................... $760,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, IL.................................... $685,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, IN.................................... $126,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, MI.................................... $2,612,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, MN.................................... $359,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, ND.................................... $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, NY.................................... $579,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, OH.................................... $234,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, OR.................................... $10,400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, PA.................................... $98,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, WA.................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, WI.................................... $388,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Sutton Lake, WV................................................................. $2,413,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Table Rock Lake, MO & AR........................................................ $7,550,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA...................................................... $130,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tampa Harbor, FL................................................................ $5,620,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Taylorsville Lake, KY........................................................... $1,104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK........................................................ $6,625,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tennessee River, TN............................................................. $16,833,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS....................... $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS........................................... $25,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Terminus Dam, Lake Kaweah, CA................................................... $2,037,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Texas City Ship Channel, TX..................................................... $4,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Texas Water Allocation Assessment, TX........................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... The Dalles Lock & Dam, WA & OR.................................................. $8,769,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Thomaston Dam, CT............................................................... $1,136,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR....................................................... $48,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA......................................................... $2,456,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tionesta Lake, PA............................................................... $1,812,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Toledo Harbor, OH............................................................... $6,034,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tom Jenkins Dam, OH............................................................. $894,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Toronto Lake, KS................................................................ $3,522,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Town Bluff Dam, B A Steinhagen Lake, TX......................................... $2,505,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Townshend Lake, VT.............................................................. $814,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Trinidad Lake, CO............................................................... $960,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tully Lake, MA.................................................................. $666,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tuttle Creek Lake, KS........................................................... $2,062,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Two Harbors, MN................................................................. $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Two Rivers Dam, NM.............................................................. $404,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Tygart Lake, WV................................................................. $1,478,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Umpqua River, OR................................................................ $1,174,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Union City Lake, PA............................................................. $440,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Union Lake, MO.................................................................. $6,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Union Village Dam, VT........................................................... $627,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Upper Rio Grande Water Operations Model Study, NM............................... $4,188,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Ventura Harbor, CA.............................................................. $6,426,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC............................................. $3,421,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Waco Lake, TX................................................................... $3,711,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wallace Lake, LA................................................................ $244,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wallisville Lake, TX............................................................ $2,114,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA.......................................... $8,972,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Washington Harbor, DC........................................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Water/Environmental Certification, AL........................................... $76,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Water/Environmental Certification, FL........................................... $380,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Water/Environmental Certification, MS........................................... $66,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Water/Environmental Certification, VA........................................... $104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Waterway from Empire to the Gulf, LA............................................ $47,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA.......................... $48,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Waterway on the Coast of Virginia, VA........................................... $201,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Waukegan Harbor, IL............................................................. $492,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Waurika Lake, OK................................................................ $1,431,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Webbers Falls Lock & Dam, OK.................................................... $5,903,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH................................................ $745,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... West Hill Dam, MA............................................................... $572,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... West Point Dam and Lake, GA & AL................................................ $9,591,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... West Thompson Lake, CT.......................................................... $569,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Westchester Creek, NY........................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Westville Lake, MA.............................................................. $784,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... White River, AR................................................................. $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Whitlow Ranch Dam, AZ........................................................... $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Whitney Lake, TX................................................................ $8,348,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Whitney Point Lake, NY.......................................................... $685,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wicomico River, MD.............................................................. $1,676,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR........................................ $918,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Willamette River Bank Protection, OR............................................ $41,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Willapa River and Harbor, WA.................................................... $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... William H. Harsha Lake, OH...................................................... $1,029,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Willow Creek Lake, OR........................................................... $629,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wilmington Harbor, DE........................................................... $2,320,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wilmington Harbor, NC........................................................... $12,155,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wilson Lake, KS................................................................. $2,017,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wister Lake, OK................................................................. $856,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wolf Creek Dam, Lake Cumberland, KY............................................. $7,835,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wolf River Harbor, TN........................................................... $373,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Woodcock Creek Lake, PA......................................................... $1,041,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Woonsocket, RI.................................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX.................................................. $3,517,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Yaquina Bay & Harbor, OR........................................................ $1,790,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Yatesville Lake, KY............................................................. $1,143,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Yazoo River, MS................................................................. $154,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Yellow Bend Port, AR............................................................ $115,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... York Indian Rock Dam, PA........................................................ $478,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Youghiogheny River Lake, PA & MD................................................ $2,335,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Yuba River, CA.................................................................. $146,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... Operation and Maintenance Items Not Listed Under States......................... ...............
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE......................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH............................................... $690,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE........................... $4,750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M BUSINESS LINES................................ $6,792,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM.................................................. $3,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT REQUIRING SPECIFIC LEGISLATION.............. ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204/145)....................... $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL MITIGATION PROJECTS (SECTION 111).................................. $9,043,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS PROJECTS.................................... $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION)............................................ $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE.................................................. $12,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE.................................................... $12,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM............................ $1,150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (DOER)........................ $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS)............................ $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM............................................ $270,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FACILITY PROTECTION............................................................. $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FERC HYDROPOWER COORDINATION.................................................... $3,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FISH AND WILDLIFEOPERATING FISH HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT.......................... $4,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL............................................ $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS............................................... $3,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS................................................... $1,780,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LONG-TERM OPTION ASSESSMENT FOR LOW USE NAVIGATION.............................. $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTS..................................... $1,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM................................................ $12,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM..................................................... $18,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM [NEPP].................................. $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY................................................ $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL (MULTI PROJECT) NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES................ $4,230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATION.................................. $571,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NATIONWIDE EVALUATION OF HYDROPOWER REHAB....................................... $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT [ABS-P2, WINABS].......................... $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION........................................................ ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS (SEC 3).............................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS.............................................. $4,771,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION...................................... $825,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RECREATION ONE STOP [R1S] NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVATION....................... $65,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.............................. $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR REHAB...................................... $608,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RESERVE FOR KEY EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS................................... ............... The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SHORELINE USE PERMIT STUDY...................................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT [WOTS]....................................... $653,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... California Bay-Delta Restoration.. CALFED.......................................................................... $41,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT..................................... $10,600,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT......................................................... $54,188,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ARBUCKLE PROJECT................................................................ $234,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT............................................. $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... BALMORHEA PROJECT............................................................... $58,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... BOISE AREA PROJECTS............................................................. $5,401,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CACHUMA PROJECT................................................................. $1,674,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................... $500,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT.............................. $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT.......................................................... $217,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CARLSBAD PROJECT................................................................ $3,719,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS......................................................... ...............
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION..................................................... $9,576,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT.................................................... $1,663,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... DELTA DIVISION.............................................................. $20,405,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... EAST SIDE DIVISION.......................................................... $4,426,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... FRIANT DIVISION............................................................. $6,256,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS.............................................. $11,796,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT............................ $25,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION................................................... $16,896,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN FELIPE DIVISION......................................................... $1,651,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION........................................................ $7,356,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SHASTA DIVISION............................................................. $8,054,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... TRINITY RIVER DIVISION...................................................... $10,495,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS.................................................. $9,280,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT.................................... $8,525,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION................................................. $450,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLLBRAN PROJECT................................................................ $3,885,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................................. $300,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT................................... $18,408,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM...................................... $2,350,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT................................................... $13,800,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT FCRPS ESA IMP.................. $18,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT.......................................................... $16,454,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... CROOKED RIVER PROJECT........................................................... $839,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... DESCHUTES PROJECT............................................................... $982,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... EASTERN NEW MEXICO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM....................................... $50,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS......................................................... $845,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... FORT PECK DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM........................................ $14,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT........................................................ $259,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT...................................................... $8,650,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II............................................. $1,477,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY...................................................... $125,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT............................................................ $1,865,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... HUNTLEY PROJECT................................................................. $87,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... HYRUM PROJECT................................................................... $198,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................................... $300,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM................................. $5,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................................... $25,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... KENDRICK PROJECT................................................................ $3,258,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... KLAMATH DAM REMOVAL STUDY....................................................... $2,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... KLAMATH PROJECT................................................................. $25,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT.......................................................... $7,276,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM................................................ $2,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS.................................................... $2,602,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY............................................... $2,965,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM.............................................. $16,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS...................................................... $1,264,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT............................. $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................................ $700,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LOWER COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................................... $250,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION PROGRAM.................... $2,050,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT....................................................... $547,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MANCOS PROJECT.................................................................. $178,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MCGEE CREEK PROJECT............................................................. $664,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT.................................................. $15,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT....................................................... $23,910,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MILK RIVER PROJECT.............................................................. $1,800,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MILK RIVER/ST. MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT............................ $4,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS.......................................................... $7,168,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT............................................................ $135,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MNI WICONI PROJECT.............................................................. $37,480,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS.......................................................... $140,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MOON LAKE PROJECT............................................................... $80,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT........................................................... $525,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................ $200,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NEWTON PROJECT.................................................................. $98,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NORMAN PROJECT.................................................................. $477,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NORTH PLATTE PROJECT............................................................ $1,617,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM......................................... $350,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................ $700,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NUECES RIVER PROJECT............................................................ $741,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... OGDEN RIVER PROJECT............................................................. $390,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................................. $150,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................................... $450,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ORLAND PROJECT.................................................................. $703,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II........................................... $2,346,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT......................................... $209,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM............................................... $2,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT........................................ $200,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION................................... $70,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PINE RIVER PROJECT.............................................................. $346,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PROVO RIVER PROJECT............................................................. $1,435,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... RAPID VALLEY PROJECT............................................................ $79,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... RIO GRANDE PROJECT.............................................................. $4,999,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM............................. $16,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION...................................... $1,345,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SALT RIVER PROJECT.............................................................. $650,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT..................................................... $400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN ANGELO PROJECT.............................................................. $436,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT.................................... $325,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION PROGRAM........................................ $3,500,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT....................................................... $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM............................... $208,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM..................................... $150,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT......................................................... $4,880,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL....................................................... $1,160,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SCOFIELD PROJECT................................................................ $187,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SHOSHONE PROJECT................................................................ $1,156,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOBABO WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT PROJECT.......................................... $10,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOLANO PROJECT.................................................................. $4,109,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................... $1,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT............................ $1,703,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM...................................... $520,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOUTHERN NEVADA/UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM..................................... $25,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INV. PROGRAM..................................... $150,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................ $225,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT....................................................... $269,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SUN RIVER PROJECT............................................................... $378,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................................... $45,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... TUALATIN PROJECT................................................................ $339,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... TUCUMCARI PROJECT............................................................... $41,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... UMATILLA PROJECT................................................................ $4,310,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT............................................................. $368,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM......................................... $250,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS........................................... $75,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... VENTURA RIVER PROJECT........................................................... $592,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT............................................................. $458,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS........................................................ $208,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................... $150,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WASHITA BASIN PROJECT........................................................... $1,055,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WEBER BASIN PROJECT............................................................. $2,492,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WEBER RIVER PROJECT............................................................. $159,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WICHITA PROJECT-CHENEY DIVISION................................................. $405,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WICHITA PROJECT-EQUUS BEDS DIVISION............................................. $2,050,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... YAKIMA PROJECT.................................................................. $8,512,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.................................... $10,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... YUMA AREA PROJECTS.............................................................. $24,500,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES............................. ...............
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE I.......................... $11,450,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE II......................... $6,970,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, (CRSP), SECTION 5....................................... $8,337,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, (CRSP), SECTION 8....................................... $2,710,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM................................ $233,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.............................................................. ............... The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM............................................... $2,029,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION.............................................. $81,600,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS........................................... $18,250,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM............................................ $488,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM.................................. $1,432,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM.............................. $19,012,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES............................. $2,187,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............................................ $947,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES.............................................. $7,675,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM......................................... $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES........................................................ $2,213,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM............................................... $8,682,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM......................................... $22,128,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS.......................................... $777,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM................................................. $6,197,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING................................. $1,563,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT............................................... $1,651,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--OTHER PICK SLOAN..................................... $39,526,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... POWER PROGRAM SERVICES.......................................................... $1,031,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM................................................ $753,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION.................................................. $2,199,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............................. $1,625,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........................................................ ............... The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM................................. $3,733,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.............................................. $10,200,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... RURAL WATER LEGISLATION, TITLE I................................................ $2,348,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... SITE SECURITY................................................................... $28,877,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM................................... $2,500,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT........................... $96,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM....................................... $6,510,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVE................................................... $22,192,000 The President
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2010
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2009 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2009
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
Investigations..................................................... 168,100 100,000 170,000 +1,900 +70,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Investigations..................................... 193,100 100,000 170,000 -23,100 +70,000
Construction....................................................... 2,141,677 1,718,000 1,924,000 -217,677 +206,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110-252).................. 2,835,000 ............... ............... -2,835,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 2,000,000 ............... ............... -2,000,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction....................................... 6,976,677 1,718,000 1,924,000 -5,052,677 +206,000
Mississippi River and tributaries.................................. 383,823 248,000 340,000 -43,823 +92,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 375,000 ............... ............... -375,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Mississippi River and tributaries.................. 758,823 248,000 340,000 -418,823 +92,000
Operations and maintenance......................................... 2,201,900 2,504,000 2,450,000 +248,100 -54,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 2,075,000 ............... ............... -2,075,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-32)................... 42,875 ............... ............... -42,875 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operations and maintenance......................... 4,319,775 2,504,000 2,450,000 -1,869,775 -54,000
Regulatory program................................................. 183,000 190,000 190,000 +7,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Regulatory program................................. 208,000 190,000 190,000 -18,000 ...............
FUSRAP............................................................. 140,000 134,000 140,000 ............... +6,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 100,000 ............... ............... -100,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Regulatory program................................. 240,000 134,000 140,000 -100,000 +6,000
Flood control and coastal emergencies.............................. ............... 41,000 ............... ............... -41,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110-252).................. 2,926,000 ............... ............... -2,926,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-32)................... 754,290 ............... ............... -754,290 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Flood control and coastal emergencies.............. 3,680,290 41,000 ............... -3,680,290 -41,000
Expenses........................................................... 179,365 184,000 186,000 +6,635 +2,000
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............ 4,500 6,000 5,000 +500 -1,000
====================================================================================
Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil................. 16,560,530 5,125,000 5,405,000 -11,155,530 +280,000
Appropriations........................................... (5,402,365) (5,125,000) (5,405,000) (+2,635) (+280,000)
Emergency appropriations................................. (11,158,165) ............... ............... (-11,158,165) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Account
Central Utah project construction.................................. 39,373 38,800 38,800 -573 ...............
Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation and conservation......... 987 1,500 1,500 +513 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 40,360 40,300 40,300 -60 ...............
Program oversight and administration............................... 1,640 1,704 1,704 +64 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Central Utah project completion account............... 42,000 42,004 42,004 +4 ...............
Bureau of Reclamation
Water and related resources........................................ 920,259 893,125 993,125 +72,866 +100,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 1,000,000 ............... ............... -1,000,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Water and related resources........................ 1,920,259 893,125 993,125 -927,134 +100,000
Central Valley project restoration fund............................ 56,079 35,358 35,358 -20,721 ...............
California Bay-Delta restoration................................... 40,000 31,000 41,000 +1,000 +10,000
Policy and administration.......................................... 59,400 61,200 61,200 +1,800 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Bureau of Reclamation................................. 2,075,738 1,020,683 1,130,683 -945,055 +110,000
====================================================================================
Total, title II, Department of the Interior.................. 2,117,738 1,062,687 1,172,687 -945,051 +110,000
Appropriations........................................... (1,117,738) (1,062,687) (1,172,687) (+54,949) (+110,000)
Emergency appropriations................................. (1,000,000) ............... ............... (-1,000,000) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs
Energy efficiency and renewable energy............................. 1,928,540 2,318,602 2,233,967 +305,427 -84,635
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110-329).................. 250,000 ............... ............... -250,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 16,800,000 ............... ............... -16,800,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy efficiency and renewable energy............. 18,978,540 2,318,602 2,233,967 -16,744,573 -84,635
Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................ 137,000 208,008 179,483 +42,483 -28,525
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 4,500,000 ............... ............... -4,500,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Electricity delivery and energy reliability........ 4,637,000 208,008 179,483 -4,457,517 -28,525
Nuclear energy..................................................... 792,000 761,634 761,274 -30,726 -360
Clean coal technology:
Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009............. 149,000 ............... ............... -149,000 ...............
Transfer to fossil energy R&D.................................. -149,000 ............... ............... +149,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Clean coal technology................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Fossil energy research and development............................. 727,320 617,565 699,200 -28,120 +81,635
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 3,400,000 ............... ............... -3,400,000 ...............
Transfer from clean coal technology............................ 149,000 ............... ............... -149,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, fossil energy research and development............. 4,276,320 617,565 699,200 -3,577,120 +81,635
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............................. 19,099 23,627 23,627 +4,528 ...............
Strategic petroleum reserve........................................ 205,000 228,573 259,073 +54,073 +30,500
Northeast home heating oil reserve................................. 9,800 11,300 11,300 +1,500 ...............
Energy Information Administration.................................. 110,595 133,058 110,595 ............... -22,463
Non-defense environmental clean up................................. 261,819 237,517 259,829 -1,990 +22,312
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 483,000 ............... ............... -483,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Non-defense environmental cleanup.................. 744,819 237,517 259,829 -484,990 +22,312
Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund........ 535,503 559,377 588,322 +52,819 +28,945
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 390,000 ............... ............... -390,000 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... ............... -200,000 ............... ............... +200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, UEDDF.............................................. 925,503 359,377 588,322 -337,181 +228,945
Science............................................................ 4,772,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 +126,196 -42,850
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 1,600,000 ............... ............... -1,600,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Science............................................ 6,372,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 -1,473,804 -42,850
Nuclear Waste Disposal............................................. 145,390 98,400 98,400 -46,990 ...............
Energy transformation acceleration fund............................ ............... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 400,000 ............... ............... -400,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy transformation acceleration fund............ 400,000 10,000 ............... -400,000 -10,000
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program....................... 19,880 43,000 43,000 +23,120 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -19,880 -43,000 -43,000 -23,120 ...............
Proposed change in subsidy cost................................ 440,000 1,500,000 ............... -440,000 -1,500,000
(Public Law 110-161):
Advance appropriation from previous years.................. 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 6,000,000 ............... ............... -6,000,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Innovative Technology Guarantee Program............ 6,465,000 1,500,000 ............... -6,465,000 -1,500,000
Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loans program........... ............... 20,000 20,000 +20,000 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110-329).................. 7,510,000 ............... ............... -7,510,000 ...............
====================================================================================
Subtotal, Advance technology vehicles manufacturing loans 7,510,000 20,000 20,000 -7,490,000 ...............
program.....................................................
Departmental administration........................................ 272,643 302,071 293,684 +21,041 -8,387
Miscellaneous revenues......................................... -117,317 -119,740 -119,740 -2,423 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net appropriation............................................ 155,326 182,331 173,944 +18,618 -8,387
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 51,927 51,445 51,927 ............... +482
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 15,000 ............... ............... -15,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Office of the Inspector General.................... 66,927 51,445 51,927 -15,000 +482
Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons activities............................................. 6,380,000 6,384,431 6,468,267 +88,267 +83,836
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-32)................... 30,000 ............... ............... -30,000 ...............
Defense nuclear nonproliferation............................... 1,482,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 +654,359 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-32)................... 55,000 ............... ............... -55,000 ...............
Naval reactors................................................. 828,054 1,003,133 973,133 +145,079 -30,000
Office of the Administrator.................................... 439,190 420,754 420,754 -18,436 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration........... 9,214,594 9,945,027 9,998,863 +784,269 +53,836
Defense environmental cleanup...................................... 5,657,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 +106,606 +268,025
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 5,127,000 ............... ............... -5,127,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup...................... 10,784,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 -5,020,394 +268,025
Other defense activities........................................... 1,314,063 852,468 854,468 -459,595 +2,000
Defense nuclear waste disposal..................................... 143,000 98,400 98,400 -44,600 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities...................... 21,455,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 -4,740,320 +323,861
====================================================================================
Power Marketing Administrations
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration....... 56,940 78,444 78,444 +21,504 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -49,520 -70,806 -70,806 -21,286 ...............
Spending in excess of receipts (proposal)...................... ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Southeastern Power Administration............. 7,420 8,638 8,638 +1,218 ...............
Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration....... 63,414 82,944 82,944 +19,530 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -35,000 -38,000 -38,000 -3,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Southwestern Power Administration............. 28,414 44,944 44,944 +16,530 ...............
Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance, Western 624,830 610,397 610,397 -14,433 ...............
Area Power Administration.........................................
Offsetting collection.......................................... -403,118 -349,807 -349,807 +53,311 ...............
Offsetting collection Colorado River Dam Fund.................. -3,366 -3,879 -3,879 -513 ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111-5).................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Western Area Power Administration............. 228,346 256,711 256,711 +28,365 ...............
Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund.................. 2,959 2,568 2,568 -391 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Power Marketing Administrations....................... 267,139 312,861 312,861 +45,722 ...............
====================================================================================
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 273,400 298,000 298,000 +24,600 ...............
Revenues applied................................................... -273,400 -298,000 -298,000 -24,600 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title III, Department of Energy....................... 73,537,001 28,407,706 27,398,221 -46,138,780 -1,009,485
Appropriations........................................... (26,793,001) (28,407,706) (27,398,221) (+605,220) (-1,009,485)
Emergency appropriations................................. (46,570,000) ............... ............... (-46,570,000) ...............
Deferrals................................................ (149,000) ............... ............... (-149,000) ...............
Previous year advance appropriations..................... (25,000) ............... ............... (-25,000) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission.................................... 75,000 76,000 76,000 +1,000 ...............
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................ 25,000 26,086 26,086 +1,086 ...............
Delta Regional Authority........................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 ............... ...............
Denali Commission.................................................. 11,800 11,965 11,965 +165 ...............
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses.......................................... 1,034,656 1,061,000 1,061,000 +26,344 ...............
Revenues....................................................... -860,857 -878,102 -902,402 -41,545 -24,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 173,799 182,898 158,598 -15,201 -24,300
Office of Inspector General.................................... 10,860 10,102 10,860 ............... +758
Revenues....................................................... -9,774 -9,092 -9,774 ............... -682
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 1,086 1,010 1,086 ............... +76
====================================================================================
Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission......................... 174,885 183,908 159,684 -15,201 -24,224
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board............................... 3,811 3,891 3,891 +80 ...............
Tennessee Valley Authority: Office of Inspector General............ ............... 19,000 ............... ............... -19,000
Offset......................................................... ............... -19,000 ............... ............... +19,000
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska natural gas 4,400 4,466 4,466 +66 ...............
transportation projects...........................................
====================================================================================
Total, title IV, Independent agencies........................ 307,896 319,316 295,092 -12,804 -24,224
====================================================================================
TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Western Area Power Administration (borrowing authority) (sec. 301). 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
====================================================================================
Grand total.................................................. 92,533,165 34,914,709 34,271,000 -58,262,165 -643,709
Appropriations........................................... (33,621,000) (34,914,709) (34,271,000) (+650,000) (-643,709)
Emergency appropriations................................. (58,738,165) ............... ............... (-58,738,165) ...............
Deferrals................................................ (149,000) ............... ............... (-149,000) ...............
Previous year advance appropriations..................... (25,000) ............... ............... (-25,000) ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------