[House Report 110-280]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]





110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    110-280

======================================================================



                    WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT

                                OF 2007

                               ----------                              

                           CONFERENCE REPORT

                              to accompany

                               H.R. 1495




                 July 31, 2007.--Ordered to be printed






                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007







110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    110-280

======================================================================

                    WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT

                                OF 2007

                               __________

                           CONFERENCE REPORT

                              to accompany

                               H.R. 1495




                 July 31, 2007.--Ordered to be printed






110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    110-280

======================================================================



 
                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007

                                _______
                                

                 July 31, 2007.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Oberstar, from the committee of conference, submitted the following

                           CONFERENCE REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 1495]

      The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 
1495), to provide for the conservation and development of water 
and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army 
to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and 
harbors of the United States, and for other purposes, having 
met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend 
and do recommend to their respective Houses as follows:
      That the House recede from its disagreement to the 
amendment of the Senate and agree to the same with an amendment 
as follows:
      In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the 
Senate amendment, insert the following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
          environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.
Sec. 1009. Small projects to prevent or mitigate damage caused by 
          navigation projects.
Sec. 1010. Small projects for aquatic plant control.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2002. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2003. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2004. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2005. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2006. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2007. Use of other Federal funds.
Sec. 2008. Revision of project partnership agreement; cost sharing.
Sec. 2009. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.
Sec. 2010. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2011. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2012. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2013. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2014. Lakes program.
Sec. 2015. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2016. Training funds.
Sec. 2017. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2018. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2019. Ability to pay.
Sec. 2020. Aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration.
Sec. 2021. Small flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 2022. Small river and harbor improvement projects.
Sec. 2023. Protection of highways, bridge approaches, public works, and 
          nonprofit public services.
Sec. 2024. Modification of projects for improvement of the quality of 
          the environment.
Sec. 2025. Remediation of abandoned mine sites.
Sec. 2026. Leasing authority.
Sec. 2027. Fiscal transparency report.
Sec. 2028. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 2029. Sense of Congress on criteria for operation and maintenance 
          of harbor dredging projects.
Sec. 2030. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 2031. Water resources principles and guidelines.
Sec. 2032. Water resource priorities report.
Sec. 2033. Planning.
Sec. 2034. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2035. Safety assurance review.
Sec. 2036. Mitigation for fish and wildlife and wetlands losses.
Sec. 2037. Regional sediment management.
Sec. 2038. National shoreline erosion control development program.
Sec. 2039. Monitoring ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 2040. Electronic submission of permit applications.
Sec. 2041. Project administration.
Sec. 2042. Program administration.
Sec. 2043. Studies and reports for water resources projects.
Sec. 2044. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
          actions.
Sec. 2045. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2046. Project deauthorization.
Sec. 2047. Federal hopper dredges.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama.
Sec. 3002. Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Seward Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3006. Tatitlek, Alaska.
Sec. 3007. Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Sec. 3008. Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona.
Sec. 3009. Tucson drainage area, Arizona.
Sec. 3010. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.
Sec. 3011. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 3012. Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas.
Sec. 3013. Red-Ouachita River Basin Levees, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Sec. 3014. Cache Creek Basin, California.
Sec. 3015. CALFED stability program, California.
Sec. 3016. Compton Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3018. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3019. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
          California.
Sec. 3020. Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 3021. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3022. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3023. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3024. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3025. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.
Sec. 3026. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3027. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3028. Redwood City Navigation Channel, California.
Sec. 3029. Sacramento and American Rivers flood control, California.
Sec. 3030. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3031. Sacramento River bank protection, California.
Sec. 3032. Salton Sea restoration, California.
Sec. 3033. Santa Ana River Mainstem, California.
Sec. 3034. Santa Barbara Streams, Lower Mission Creek, California.
Sec. 3035. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 3036. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 3037. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3038. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3039. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3040. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3041. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3042. South Platte River basin, Colorado.
Sec. 3043. Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, 
          Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 3044. St. George's Bridge, Delaware.
Sec. 3045. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3046. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3047. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3048. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3049. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3050. Peanut Island, Florida.
Sec. 3051. Port Sutton, Florida.
Sec. 3052. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3053. Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida.
Sec. 3054. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3055. Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia.
Sec. 3056. Dworshak Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3057. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 3058. Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois.
Sec. 3059. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3060. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3061. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, 
          Illinois.
Sec. 3062. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3063. Lasalle, Illinois.
Sec. 3064. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3065. Cedar Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3066. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3067. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3068. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa.
Sec. 3069. Perry Creek, Iowa.
Sec. 3070. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 3071. Hickman Bluff stabilization, Kentucky.
Sec. 3072. Mcalpine Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Indiana.
Sec. 3073. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3074. Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
          Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3075. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3076. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, regional visitor center, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3077. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3078. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana.
Sec. 3079. Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.
Sec. 3080. Red River (J. Bennett Johnston) Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 3081. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3082. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet relocation assistance, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3083. Violet, Louisiana.
Sec. 3084. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3085. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3086. Cumberland, Maryland.
Sec. 3087. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 3088. Detroit River shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3089. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 3090. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 3091. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 3092. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3093. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3094. Grand Marais, Minnesota.
Sec. 3095. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3096. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3097. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3098. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3099. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3100. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3101. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3102. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3103. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3104. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi.
Sec. 3105. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.
Sec. 3106. L-15 levee, Missouri.
Sec. 3107. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri.
Sec. 3108. River Des Peres, Missouri.
Sec. 3109. Lower Yellowstone project, Montana.
Sec. 3110. Yellowstone River and tributaries, Montana and North Dakota.
Sec. 3111. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sec. 3112. Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3113. Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska.
Sec. 3114. Lower Truckee River, McCarran Ranch, Nevada.
Sec. 3115. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.
Sec. 3116. Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 3117. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.
Sec. 3118. Middle Rio Grande restoration, New Mexico.
Sec. 3119. Buffalo Harbor, New York.
Sec. 3120. Long Island Sound oyster restoration, New York and 
          Connecticut.
Sec. 3121. Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed management, New 
          York.
Sec. 3122. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3123. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3124. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3125. Susquehanna River and Upper Delaware River watershed 
          management, New York.
Sec. 3126. Missouri River restoration, North Dakota.
Sec. 3127. Wahpeton, North Dakota.
Sec. 3128. Ohio.
Sec. 3129. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio.
Sec. 3130. Mahoning River, Ohio.
Sec. 3131. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3132. Arkansas River Corridor, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3133. Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3134. Oklahoma lakes demonstration program, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3135. Ottawa County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3136. Red River chloride control, Oklahoma and Texas.
Sec. 3137. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3138. Upper Willamette River watershed ecosystem restoration, 
          Oregon.
Sec. 3139. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
Sec. 3140. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3141. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
          Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3142. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3143. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3144. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3145. Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.
Sec. 3146. Missouri River Restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 3147. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3148. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3149. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3150. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3151. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3152. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3153. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3154. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3155. Connecticut River restoration, Vermont.
Sec. 3156. Dam remediation, Vermont.
Sec. 3157. Lake Champlain Eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other 
          nonnative plant control, Vermont.
Sec. 3158. Upper Connecticut River Basin wetland restoration, Vermont 
          and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3159. Upper Connecticut River basin ecosystem restoration, Vermont 
          and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3160. Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 3161. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 3162. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3163. Duwamish/Green, Washington.
Sec. 3164. McNary Lock and Dam, McNary National Wildlife Refuge, 
          Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3165. Snake River project, Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3166. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington.
Sec. 3167. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3168. Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3169. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 3170. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 3171. Mcdowell County, West Virginia.
Sec. 3172. Parkersburg, West Virginia.
Sec. 3173. Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3174. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3175. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3176. Upper basin of Missouri River.
Sec. 3177. Upper Mississippi River System environmental management 
          program.
Sec. 3178. Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system new 
          technology pilot program.
Sec. 3179. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 3180. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3181. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3182. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3183. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
          restrictions.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program.
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study.
Sec. 4004. Delaware River.
Sec. 4005. Eurasian milfoil.
Sec. 4006. Fire Island, Alaska.
Sec. 4007. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 4008. Kuskokwim River, Alaska.
Sec. 4009. Nome Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4010. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4011. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4012. Valdez, Alaska.
Sec. 4013. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
Sec. 4014. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4015. Aliso Creek, California.
Sec. 4016. Fresno, Kings, and Kern counties, California.
Sec. 4017. Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda, California.
Sec. 4018. Los Angeles River revitalization study, California.
Sec. 4019. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4020. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 4021. Orick, California.
Sec. 4022. Shoreline study, Oceanside, California.
Sec. 4023. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.
Sec. 4024. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4025. San Diego County, California.
Sec. 4026. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4027. South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, California.
Sec. 4028. Twentynine Palms, California.
Sec. 4029. Yucca Valley, California.
Sec. 4030. Selenium studies, Colorado.
Sec. 4031. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
          Delaware.
Sec. 4032. Delaware inland bays and tributaries and Atlantic coast, 
          Delaware.
Sec. 4033. Collier County Beaches, Florida.
Sec. 4034. Lower St. Johns River, Florida.
Sec. 4035. Herbert Hoover Dike supplemental major rehabilitation report, 
          Florida.
Sec. 4036. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
Sec. 4037. Meriwether County, Georgia.
Sec. 4038. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4039. Ballard's Island Side Channel, Illinois.
Sec. 4040. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4041. Salem, Indiana.
Sec. 4042. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4043. Dewey Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4044. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 4045. Vidalia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 4046. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Sec. 4047. Clinton River, Michigan.
Sec. 4048. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
Sec. 4049. Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
Sec. 4050. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4051. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4052. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey.
Sec. 4053. Bayonne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4054. Carteret, New Jersey.
Sec. 4055. Gloucester County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4056. Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
Sec. 4057. Batavia, New York.
Sec. 4058. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
Sec. 4059. Finger Lakes, New York.
Sec. 4060. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 4061. Newtown Creek, New York.
Sec. 4062. Niagara River, New York.
Sec. 4063. Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
Sec. 4064. Upper Delaware River watershed, New York.
Sec. 4065. Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4066. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4067. Yadkinville, North Carolina.
Sec. 4068. Flood damage reduction, Ohio.
Sec. 4069. Lake Erie, Ohio.
Sec. 4070. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4071. Toledo Harbor dredged material placement, Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4072. Toledo Harbor, Maumee River, and Lake Channel project, 
          Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4073. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4074. Walla Walla River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 4075. Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4076. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4077. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction.
Sec. 4078. Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4079. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4080. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4081. Woonsocket local protection project, Blackstone River basin, 
          Rhode Island.
Sec. 4082. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.
Sec. 4083. Broad River, York County, South Carolina.
Sec. 4084. Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia.
Sec. 4085. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 4086. Cleveland, Tennessee.
Sec. 4087. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 4088. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.
Sec. 4089. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 4090. Abilene, Texas.
Sec. 4091. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas.
Sec. 4092. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4093. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4094. Southwestern Utah.
Sec. 4095. Ecosystem and hydropower generation dams, Vermont.
Sec. 4096. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4097. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4098. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4099. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4100. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4101. Debris removal.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
          projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 5011. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration program.
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes tributary models.
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes navigation and protection.
Sec. 5015. Saint Lawrence Seaway.
Sec. 5016. Upper Mississippi River dispersal barrier project.
Sec. 5017. Estuary restoration.
Sec. 5018. Missouri River and tributaries, mitigation, recovery, and 
          restoration, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North 
          Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
Sec. 5019. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins, Delaware, 
          Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Sec. 5020. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
          program.
Sec. 5021. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration, Virginia and Maryland.
Sec. 5022. Hypoxia assessment.
Sec. 5023. Potomac River watershed assessment and tributary strategy 
          evaluation and monitoring program.
Sec. 5024. Lock and dam security.
Sec. 5025. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake River 
          salmon survival.
Sec. 5026. Wage surveys.
Sec. 5027. Rehabilitation.
Sec. 5028. Auburn, Alabama.
Sec. 5029. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5030. Alaska.
Sec. 5031. Barrow, Alaska.
Sec. 5032. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5033. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5034. Tanana River, Alaska.
Sec. 5035. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5036. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5037. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas.
Sec. 5038. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5039. California.
Sec. 5040. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, 
          Stockton, California.
Sec. 5041. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5042. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; Mallard 
          Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5043. Dana Point Harbor, California.
Sec. 5044. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5045. Eastern Santa Clara basin, California.
Sec. 5046. LA-3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, 
          California.
Sec. 5047. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 5048. Los Osos, California.
Sec. 5049. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat, California.
Sec. 5050. Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel 
          Basin, California.
Sec. 5051. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5052. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5053. San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh 
          ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5054. St. Helena, California.
Sec. 5055. Upper Calaveras River, Stockton, California.
Sec. 5056. Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New 
          Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 5057. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
          Connecticut.
Sec. 5058. Stamford, Connecticut.
Sec. 5059. Delmarva conservation corridor, Delaware, Maryland, and 
          Virginia.
Sec. 5060. Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5061. East Central and Northeast Florida.
Sec. 5062. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5063. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5064. Big Creek, Georgia, watershed management and restoration 
          program.
Sec. 5065. Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
Sec. 5066. Savannah, Georgia.
Sec. 5067. Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and 
          Wyoming.
Sec. 5068. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho.
Sec. 5069. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5070. Reconstruction of Illinois and Missouri flood protection 
          projects.
Sec. 5071. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 5072. Promontory Point third-party review, Chicago shoreline, 
          Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5073. Kaskaskia River basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5074. Southwest Illinois.
Sec. 5075. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5076. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa.
Sec. 5077. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 5078. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5079. Winchester, Kentucky.
Sec. 5080. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5081. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 5082. East Atchafalaya basin and Amite River basin region, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 5083. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana.
Sec. 5084. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 5085. Southeast Louisiana region, Louisiana.
Sec. 5086. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5087. Charlestown, Maryland.
Sec. 5088. St. Mary's River, Maryland.
Sec. 5089. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 5090. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 5091. Crookston, Minnesota.
Sec. 5092. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5093. Itasca County, Minnesota.
Sec. 5094. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 5095. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5096. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 5097. Mississippi.
Sec. 5098. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5099. Mississippi River, Missouri and Illinois.
Sec. 5100. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5101. St. Louis Regional Greenways, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5102. Missoula, Montana.
Sec. 5103. St. Mary project, Glacier County, Montana.
Sec. 5104. Lower Platte River watershed restoration, Nebraska.
Sec. 5105. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5106. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5107. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5108. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5109. Hudson River, New York.
Sec. 5110. Mount Morris Dam, New York.
Sec. 5111. North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed 
          restoration, New York.
Sec. 5112. Rochester, New York.
Sec. 5113. North Carolina.
Sec. 5114. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5115. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5116. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 5117. Ohio River basin environmental management.
Sec. 5118. Toussaint River navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 5119. Statewide comprehensive water planning, Oklahoma.
Sec. 5120. Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.
Sec. 5121. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5122. Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5123. Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5124. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5125. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5126. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5127. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5128. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina.
Sec. 5129. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
          terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 5130. East Tennessee.
Sec. 5131. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5132. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.
Sec. 5133. Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 5134. Nonconnah Weir, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 5135. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5136. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5137. Upper Mississippi embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and 
          Mississippi.
Sec. 5138. Texas.
Sec. 5139. Bosque River watershed, Texas.
Sec. 5140. Dallas County region, Texas.
Sec. 5141. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 5142. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5143. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 5144. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5145. Connecticut River dams, Vermont.
Sec. 5146. Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 5147. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
Sec. 5148. Eastern Shore and Southwest Virginia.
Sec. 5149. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 5150. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5151. Hamilton Island campground, Washington.
Sec. 5152. Erosion control, Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington.
Sec. 5153. Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 5154. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5155. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5156. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5157. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
          interests.
Sec. 5158. Additional assistance for critical projects.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.
Sec. 6002. Pilot projects.
Sec. 6003. Maximum costs.
Sec. 6004. Credit.
Sec. 6005. Outreach and assistance.
Sec. 6006. Critical restoration projects.
Sec. 6007. Regional engineering model for environmental restoration.

                    TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

Sec. 7001. Definitions.
Sec. 7002. Comprehensive plan.
Sec. 7003. Louisiana coastal area.
Sec. 7004. Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
          Force.
Sec. 7005. Project modifications.
Sec. 7006. Construction.
Sec. 7007. Non-Federal cost share.
Sec. 7008. Project justification.
Sec. 7009. Independent review.
Sec. 7010. Expedited reports.
Sec. 7011. Reporting.
Sec. 7012. New Orleans and vicinity.
Sec. 7013. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet.
Sec. 7014. Hurricane and storm damage reduction.
Sec. 7015. Larose to Golden Meadow.
Sec. 7016. Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

Sec. 8001. Definitions.
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration.
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements.
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization.
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress.

                 TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

Sec. 9001. Short title.
Sec. 9002. Definitions.
Sec. 9003. Committee on Levee Safety.
Sec. 9004. Inventory and inspection of levees.
Sec. 9005. Limitations on statutory construction.
Sec. 9006. Authorization of appropriations.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
the Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and 
other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports 
designated in this section:
            (1) Haines, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Haines, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 20, 2004, at a total cost of $14,040,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $11,232,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $2,808,000.
            (2) Port lions, alaska.--The project for 
        navigation, Port Lions, Alaska: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated June 14, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $9,530,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $7,624,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,906,000.
            (3) Santa cruz river, paseo de las iglesias, 
        arizona.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Santa Cruz River, Pima County, Arizona: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated March 28, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $97,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $63,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $34,400,000.
            (4) Tanque verde creek, pima county, arizona.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde 
        Creek, Pima County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $5,906,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $3,836,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $2,070,000.
            (5) Salt river (rio salado oeste), maricopa county, 
        arizona.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Salt River (Rio Salado Oeste), Maricopa County, 
        Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $166,650,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $106,629,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $60,021,000.
            (6) Salt river (va shly'ay akimel), maricopa 
        county, arizona.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for 
                environmental restoration, Salt River (Va 
                Shly'ay Akimel), Arizona: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total 
                cost of $162,100,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $105,200,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $56,900,000.
                    (B) Coordination with federal reclamation 
                projects.--The Secretary, to the maximum extent 
                practicable, shall coordinate the design and 
                construction of the project described in 
                subparagraph (A) with the Bureau of Reclamation 
                and any operating agent for any Federal 
                reclamation project in the Salt River Basin to 
                avoid impacts to existing Federal reclamation 
                facilities and operations in the Salt River 
                Basin.
            (7) May branch, fort smith, arkansas.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, 
        Arkansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $30,850,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $15,010,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $15,840,000.
            (8) Hamilton city, glenn county, california.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
        restoration, Hamilton City, Glenn County, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 
        2004, at a total cost of $52,400,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $34,100,000 and estimated non-Federal 
        cost of $18,300,000.
            (9) Silver strand shoreline, imperial beach, 
        california.--The project for storm damage reduction, 
        Silver Strand Shoreline, Imperial Beach, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 
        2003, at a total cost of $13,700,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $8,521,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
        cost of $5,179,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
        $42,500,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-
        year life of the project, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $21,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $21,250,000.
            (10) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Matilija Dam, 
        Ventura County, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $144,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $89,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $54,800,000.
            (11) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
        restoration, Middle Creek, Lake County, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 
        2004, at a total cost of $45,200,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $29,500,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $15,700,000.
            (12) Napa river salt marsh restoration, 
        california.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for 
                environmental restoration, Napa River Salt 
                Marsh Restoration, Napa, California: Report of 
                the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, 
                at a total cost of $134,500,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $87,500,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $47,000,000.
                    (B) Administration.--In carrying out the 
                project authorized by this paragraph, the 
                Secretary shall--
                            (i) construct a recycled water 
                        pipeline extending from the Sonoma 
                        Valley County Sanitation District Waste 
                        Water Treatment Plant and the Napa 
                        Sanitation District Waste Water 
                        Treatment Plant to the project; and
                            (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 
                        1, 1A, 2, and 3.
            (13) Denver county reach, south platte river, 
        denver, colorado.--The project for environmental 
        restoration, Denver County Reach, South Platte River, 
        Denver, Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $20,100,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $13,065,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $7,035,000.
            (14) Central and southern florida, indian river 
        lagoon, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry 
                out the project for ecosystem restoration, 
                water supply, flood control, and protection of 
                water quality, Central and Southern Florida, 
                Indian River Lagoon, Florida, at a total cost 
                of $1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $682,500,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $682,500,000, in accordance 
                with section 601 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680) and 
                the recommendations of the report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated August 6, 2004.
                    (B) Deauthorizations.--The following 
                projects are not authorized after the date of 
                enactment of this Act:
                            (i) The uncompleted portions of the 
                        project for the C-44 Basin Storage 
                        Reservoir of the Comprehensive 
                        Everglades Restoration Plan, authorized 
                        by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Water 
                        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
                        Stat. 2682), at a total cost of 
                        $147,800,000, with an estimated Federal 
                        cost of $73,900,000 and an estimated 
                        non-Federal cost of $73,900,000.
                            (ii) The uncompleted portions of 
                        the Martin County, Florida, 
                        modifications to the project for 
                        Central and Southern Florida, 
                        authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
                        Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at 
                        a total cost of $15,471,000, with an 
                        estimated Federal cost of $8,073,000 
                        and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                        $7,398,000.
                            (iii) The uncompleted portions of 
                        the East Coast Backpumping, St. Lucie-
                        Martin County, Spillway Structure S-311 
                        modifications to the project for 
                        Central and Southern Florida, 
                        authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
                        Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at 
                        a total cost of $77,118,000, with an 
                        estimated Federal cost of $55,124,000 
                        and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                        $21,994,000.
            (15) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, 
        central and southern florida, picayune strand 
        restoration project, collier county, florida.--The 
        project for ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive 
        Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern 
        Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration Project, Collier 
        County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        September 15, 2005, at a total cost of $375,330,000 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $187,665,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $187,665,000.
            (16) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, 
        central and southern florida, site 1 impoundment 
        project, palm beach county, florida.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive Everglades 
        Restoration Plan, Central and Southern Florida, Site 1 
        Impoundment Project, Palm Beach County, Florida: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a 
        total cost of $80,840,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $40,420,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $40,420,000.
            (17) Miami harbor, miami-dade county, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for 
                navigation, Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, 
                Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                April 25, 2005, at a total cost of 
                $125,270,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $75,140,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                of $50,130,000.
                    (B) General reevaluation report.--The non-
                Federal share of the cost of the general 
                reevaluation report that resulted in the report 
                of the Chief of Engineers referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be the same percentage 
                as the non-Federal share of cost of 
                construction of the project.
                    (C) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter 
                into a new partnership with the non-Federal 
                interest to reflect the cost sharing required 
                by subparagraph (B).
            (18) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The 
        project for environmental restoration and recreation, 
        East St. Louis and Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
        cost of $208,260,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $134,910,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $73,350,000.
            (19) Peoria riverfront development, illinois.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Peoria 
        Riverfront Development, Illinois: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated July 28, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $18,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,380,000.
            (20) Wood river levee system reconstruction, 
        madison county, illinois.--The project for flood damage 
        reduction, Wood River Levee System Reconstruction, 
        Madison County, Illinois: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated July 18, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $17,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,193,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,027,000.
            (21) Des moines and raccoon rivers, des moines, 
        iowa.--The project for flood damage reduction, Des 
        Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated March 28, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $10,780,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $6,967,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,813,000.
            (22) Licking river basin, cynthiana, kentucky.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Licking River 
        Basin, Cynthiana, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $18,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,830,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,370,000.
            (23) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total 
        cost of $9,600,000. The costs of construction of the 
        project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated 
        from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from 
        amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust 
        Fund.
            (24) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane 
                and storm damage reduction, Morganza to the 
                Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated August 23, 2002, and July 
                22, 2003, at a total cost of $886,700,000, with 
                an estimated Federal cost of $576,355,000 and 
                an estimated non-Federal cost of $310,345,000.
                    (B) Operation and maintenance.--The 
                operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, 
                and replacement of the Houma Navigation Canal 
                lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
                floodgate features of the project described in 
                subparagraph (A) that provide for inland 
                waterway transportation shall be a Federal 
                responsibility in accordance with section 102 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                (33 U.S.C. 2212).
            (25) Port of iberia, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $131,250,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $105,315,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $25,935,000; except that the Secretary, in consultation 
        with Vermillion and Iberia Parishes, Louisiana, and 
        consistent with the mitigation plan in the report, 
        shall use available dredged material and rock placement 
        on the south bank of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and 
        the west bank of the Freshwater Bayou Channel to 
        provide incidental storm surge protection that does not 
        adversely affect the mitigation plan.
            (26) Smith island, somerset county, maryland.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Smith Island, 
        Somerset County, Maryland: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated October 29, 2001, at a total cost of 
        $15,580,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $10,127,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $5,453,000.
            (27) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, 
        Minnesota: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $25,100,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $13,820,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $11,280,000.
            (28) Argentine, east bottoms, fairfax-jersey creek, 
        and north kansas levees units, missouri river and 
        tributaries at kansas cities, missouri and kansas.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Argentine, East 
        Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, and North Kansas Levees 
        units, Missouri River and tributaries at Kansas Cities, 
        Missouri and Kansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $65,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $42,530,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $22,900,000.
            (29) Swope park industrial area, blue river, kansas 
        city, missouri.--The project for flood damage 
        reduction, Swope Park Industrial Area, Blue River, 
        Kansas City, Missouri: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,037,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $5,943,000.
            (30) Great egg harbor inlet to townsends inlet, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction, Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, 
        New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        October 24, 2006, at a total cost of $54,360,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $35,069,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $19,291,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $202,500,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $101,250,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $101,250,000.
            (31) Hudson raritan estuary, liberty state park, 
        new jersey.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for 
                environmental restoration, Hudson Raritan 
                Estuary, Liberty State Park, New Jersey: Report 
                of the Chief of Engineers dated August 25, 
                2006, at a total cost of $34,100,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $22,200,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
                    (B) Restoration teams.--In carrying out the 
                project, the Secretary shall establish and 
                utilize watershed restoration teams composed of 
                estuary restoration experts from the Corps of 
                Engineers, the New Jersey department of 
                environmental protection, and the Port 
                Authority of New York and New Jersey and other 
                experts designated by the Secretary for the 
                purpose of developing habitat restoration and 
                water quality enhancement.
            (32) New jersey shore protection study, manasquan 
        inlet to barnegat inlet, new jersey.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, New Jersey Shore 
        Protection Study, Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, 
        New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $71,900,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $25,165,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $119,680,000 for periodic beach 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $59,840,000.
            (33) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, union beach, 
        new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, 
        New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        January 4, 2006, at a total cost of $115,000,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $74,800,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $40,200,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $6,500,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $3,250,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $3,250,000.
            (34) South river, raritan river basin, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction and environmental restoration, South River, 
        Raritan River Basin, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $122,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $79,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $42,800,000.
            (35) Southwest valley, bernalillo county, new 
        mexico.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
        Southwest Valley, Bernalillo County, New Mexico: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a 
        total cost of $24,840,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $8,690,000.
            (36) Montauk point, new york.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, 
        New York: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 
        31, 2006, at a total cost of $14,600,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
            (37) Hocking river basin, monday creek, ohio.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem 
                restoration, Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, 
                Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                August 24, 2006, at a total cost of 
                $20,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $13,440,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                of $7,540,000.
                    (B) Wayne national forest.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary, in 
                        cooperation with the Secretary of 
                        Agriculture, may construct other 
                        project features on property that is 
                        located in the Wayne National Forest, 
                        Ohio, owned by the United States and 
                        managed by the Forest Service as 
                        described in the report of the Corps of 
                        Engineers entitled ``Hocking River 
                        Basin, Ohio, Monday Creek Sub-Basin 
                        Ecosystem Restoration Project 
                        Feasibility Report and Environmental 
                        Assessment''.
                            (ii) Cost.--Each project feature 
                        carried out on Federal land shall be 
                        designed, constructed, operated, and 
                        maintained at Federal expense.
                            (iii) Authorization of 
                        appropriations.--There is authorized to 
                        be appropriated to the Secretary of 
                        Agriculture to carry out this 
                        subparagraph $1,270,000.
            (38) Town of bloomsburg, columbia county, 
        pennsylvania.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
        town of Bloomsburg, Columbia County, Pennsylvania: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 25, 
        2006, at a total cost of $44,500,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $28,925,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $15,575,000.
            (39) Pawleys island, south carolina.--The project 
        for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Pawleys 
        Island, South Carolina: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $5,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
        $21,200,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
        life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $10,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $10,600,000.
            (40) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, 
        texas.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation 
                and ecosystem restoration, Corpus Christi Ship 
                Channel, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
                Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total cost 
                of $188,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
                of $87,810,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
                cost of $100,300,000.
                    (B) Navigational servitude.--In carrying 
                out the project under subparagraph (A), the 
                Secretary shall enforce the navigational 
                servitude in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel 
                (including the removal or relocation of any 
                facility obstructing the project) consistent 
                with the cost sharing requirements of section 
                101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
            (41) Gulf intracoastal waterway, brazos river to 
        port o'connor, matagorda bay re-route, texas.--The 
        project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
        Brazos River to Port O'Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, 
        Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 
        24, 2002, at a total cost of $17,280,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from 
        amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
        Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (42) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to 
        brazos river, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway, High Island to Brazos River, 
        Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 16, 
        2004, at a total cost of $14,450,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from 
        amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
        Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (43) Lower colorado river basin phase i, texas.--
        The project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
        restoration, Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 
        2006, at a total cost of $110,730,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $69,640,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $41,090,000.
            (44) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge 
        replacement, deep creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The 
        project for Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge 
        Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated March 3, 2003, at a 
        total cost of $37,200,000.
            (45) Craney island eastward expansion, norfolk 
        harbor and channels, hampton roads, virginia.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for 
                navigation, Craney Island Eastward Expansion, 
                Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Hampton Roads, 
                Virginia: Report of Chief of Engineers dated 
                October 24, 2006, at a total cost of 
                $712,103,000.
                    (B) Non-federal share.--Notwithstanding 
                sections 101 and 103 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 and 
                2213), the Federal share of the cost of the 
                project shall be 50 percent.
            (46) Centralia, chehalis river, lewis county, 
        washington.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for flood 
                damage reduction, Centralia, Chehalis River, 
                Lewis County, Washington: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated September 27, 2004, at a 
                total cost of $123,770,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $74,740,000 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $49,030,000.
                    (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall--
                            (i) credit, in accordance with 
                        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
                        non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                        project up to $6,500,000 for the cost 
                        of planning and design work carried out 
                        by the non-Federal interest in 
                        accordance with the project study plan 
                        dated November 28, 1999; and
                            (ii) credit toward the non-Federal 
                        share of the cost of the project, the 
                        cost of design and construction work 
                        carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                        before the date of the partnership 
                        agreement for the project if the 
                        Secretary determines that the work is 
                        integral to the project.

SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Haleyville, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Haleyville, Alabama.
            (2) Weiss lake, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama.
            (3) Fort yukon, alaska.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Fort Yukon, Alaska.
            (4) Little colorado river levee, arizona.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Little Colorado River 
        Levee, Arizona.
            (5) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, 
        Arkansas.
            (6) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs 
        Wash, Palmdale, California.
            (7) Borrego springs, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Borrego Springs, California.
            (8) Colton, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Colton, California.
            (9) Dunlap stream, yucaipa, california.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, 
        California.
            (10) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, 
        Palmdale, California.
            (11) Ontario and chino, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California.
            (12) Santa venetia, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Santa Venetia, California.
            (13) Whittier, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Whittier, California.
            (14) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, 
        California.
            (15) Bibb county and city of macon levee, 
        georgia.--Project for flood damage reduction, Bibb 
        County and City of Macon Levee, Georgia.
            (16) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, 
        Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana.
            (17) St. francisville, lousiana.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana.
            (18) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Salem, Massachusetts.
            (19) Cass river, michigan.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, 
        Michigan.
            (20) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, 
        Minnesota.
            (21) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
            (22) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--Project for flood damage reduction, South 
        Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
            (23) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, 
        St. Joseph, Missouri.
            (24) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton 
        Lakes, New Jersey.
            (25) Canisteo river, addison, new york.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Canisteo River, Addison, 
        New York.
            (26) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, 
        New York.
            (27) Dry and otter creeks, cortland, new york.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter 
        Creeks, Cortland, New York.
            (28) East river, silver beach, new york city, new 
        york.--Project for flood damage reduction, East River, 
        Silver Beach, New York City, New York.
            (29) East valley creek, andover, new york.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, 
        New York.
            (30) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new 
        york.--Project for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside 
        Brook, Westchester County, New York.
            (31) Little yankee and mud run, trumbull county, 
        ohio.--Project for flood damage reduction, Little 
        Yankee and Mud Run, Trumbull County, Ohio.
            (32) Little neshaminy creek, warrington, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrington, Pennsylvania.
            (33) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Southampton Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania.
            (34) Spring creek, lower macungie township, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Spring Creek, Lower Macungie Township, Pennsylvania.
            (35) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, 
        yardley, pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Yardley Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, 
        Yardley, Pennsylvania.
            (36) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, 
        South Carolina.
            (37) Sandy creek, jackson county, tennessee.--A 
        project for flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, 
        Jackson County, Tennessee.
            (38) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, 
        Missouri City, Texas.
            (39) Dilley, texas.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Dilley, Texas.
            (40) Cheyenne, wyoming.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--The 
        Secretary may proceed with the project for the Cache 
        River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas, referred to in 
        subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding that the project is 
        located within the boundaries of the flood control 
        project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, 
        authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1950, (64 Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41).
            (2) Ontario and chino, california.--The Secretary 
        shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, 
        Ontario and Chino, California, referred to in 
        subsection (a)(11) if the Secretary determines that the 
        project is feasible.
            (3) Santa venetia, california.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Santa 
        Venetia, California, referred to in subsection (a)(12) 
        if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        feasible and shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
        participate in the financing of the project in 
        accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent 
        that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
        such section is necessary to implement the project.
            (4) Whittier, california.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for flood damage reduction, 
        Whittier, California, referred to in subsection (a)(13) 
        if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        feasible.
            (5) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--The 
        Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for 
        the project for flood damage, Wildwood Creek, 
        California, referred to in subsection (a)(14) and, if 
        the Secretary determines that the plan meets the 
        evaluation and design standards of the Corps of 
        Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary 
        may use the plan to carry out the project and shall 
        provide credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project for the cost of work carried out by the 
        non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
        that the work is integral to the project.
            (6) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--In carrying 
        out the project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary's 
        and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana, 
        referred to in subsection (a)(16) the Secretary shall--
                    (A) provide a 100-year level of flood 
                protection at the Berry Thieme, Park-Thompson, 
                Woodhurst, and Tillman sites along the St. 
                Mary's River; and
                    (B) allow the non-Federal interest to 
                participate in the financing of the project in 
                accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
                4184) to the extent that the Secretary's 
                evaluation indicates that applying such section 
                is necessary to implement the project.
            (7) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--In carrying out the project for flood 
        damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, 
        Borup, Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(22) the 
        Secretary may consider national ecosystem restoration 
        benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
        project and shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
        participate in the financing of the project in 
        accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent 
        that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
        such section is necessary to implement the project.
            (8) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--The 
        Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage 
        reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, 
        referred to in subsection (a)(24) if the Secretary 
        determines that the project is feasible.
            (9) Sandy creek, tennessee.--Consistent with the 
        report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 24, 1948, 
        on the West Tennessee Tributaries project, in carrying 
        out the project for flood damage reduction, Sandy 
        Creek, Tennessee, referred to in section (a)(37)--
                    (A) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to 
                be an authorized channel of the West Tennessee 
                Tributaries project; and
                    (B) the project shall not be considered to 
                be part of the West Tennessee Tributaries 
                project.
            (10) Dilley, texas.--The Secretary shall carry out 
        the project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, 
        referred to in subsection (a)(39) if the Secretary 
        determines that the project is feasible.

SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 14 
of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Aliso creek, california.--Projects for 
        emergency streambank protection, Aliso Creek, 
        California.
            (2) St. johns bluff training wall, duval county, 
        florida.--Project for emergency streambank protection, 
        St. Johns Bluff Training Wall, Duval County, Florida.
            (3) Gulf intracoastal waterway, iberville parish, 
        louisiana.--Projects for emergency streambank 
        protection, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Iberville 
        Parish, Louisiana.
            (4) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas and 
        louisiana.--Projects for emergency streambank 
        protection, Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and 
        Louisiana.
            (5) Piney point lighthouse, st. mary's county, 
        maryland.--Project for emergency streambank protection, 
        Piney Point Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
            (6) Pug hole lake, minnesota.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Pug Hole Lake, 
        Minnesota.
            (7) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, 
        missouri.--Project for emergency streambank protection, 
        Middle Fork Grand River, Gentry County, Missouri.
            (8) Platte river, platte city, missouri.--Project 
        for emergency streambank protection, Platte River, 
        Platte City, Missouri.
            (9) Rush creek, parkville, missouri.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Rush Creek, Parkville, 
        Missouri, including measures to address degradation of 
        the creek bed.
            (10) Dry and otter creeks, cortland county, new 
        york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Dry 
        and Otter Creeks, Cortland County, New York.
            (11) Keuka lake, hammondsport, new york.--Project 
        for emergency streambank protection, Keuka Lake, 
        Hammondsport, New York.
            (12) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new 
        windsor, new york.--Project for emergency streambank 
        protection, Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New 
        Windsor, New York.
            (13) Owego creek, tioga county, new york.--Project 
        for emergency streambank protection, Owego Creek, Tioga 
        County, New York.
            (14) Howard road outfall, shelby county, 
        tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank 
        protection, Howard Road outfall, Shelby County, 
        Tennessee.
            (15) Mitch farm ditch and lateral d, shelby county, 
        tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank 
        protection, Mitch Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby 
        County, Tennessee.
            (16) Wolf river tributaries, shelby county, 
        tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank 
        protection, Wolf River tributaries, Shelby County, 
        Tennessee.
            (17) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Johnson Creek, 
        Arlington, Texas.
            (18) Wells river, newbury, vermont.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Wells River, Newbury, 
        Vermont.

SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577):
            (1) Barrow harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, 
        Barrow Harbor, Alaska.
            (2) Coffman cove, alaska.--Project for navigation, 
        Coffman Cove, Alaska.
            (3) Kotzebue harbor, alaska.--Project for 
        navigation, Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska.
            (4) Nome harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, 
        Nome Harbor, Alaska.
            (5) Old harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, 
        Old Harbor, Alaska.
            (6) Little rock port, arkansas.--Project for 
        navigation, Little Rock Port, Arkansas River, Arkansas.
            (7) Mississippi river ship channel, louisiana.--
        Project for navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, 
        Louisiana.
            (8) East basin, cape cod canal, sandwich, 
        massachusetts.--Project for navigation, East Basin, 
        Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, Massachusetts.
            (9) Lynn harbor, lynn, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
            (10) Merrimack river, haverhill, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, 
        Massachusetts.
            (11) Oak bluffs harbor, oak bluffs, 
        massachusetts.--Project for navigation, Oak Bluffs 
        Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
            (12) Woods hole great harbor, falmouth, 
        massachusetts.--Project for navigation, Woods Hole 
        Great Harbor, Falmouth, Massachusetts.
            (13) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Au Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, 
        Michigan.
            (14) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Clinton River, Michigan.
            (15) Ontonagon river, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Ontonagon River, Ontonagon, Michigan.
            (16) Outer channel and inner harbor, menominee 
        harbor, michigan and wisconsin.--Project for 
        navigation, Outer Channel and Inner Harbor, Menominee 
        Harbor, Michigan and Wisconsin.
            (17) Sebewaing river, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Sebewaing River, Michigan.
            (18) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, 
        michigan.--Project for navigation, Traverse City 
        Harbor, Traverse City, Michigan.
            (19) Tower harbor, tower, minnesota.--Project for 
        navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota.
            (20) Olcott harbor, olcott, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York.
            (21) Milwaukee harbor, wisconsin.--Project for 
        navigation, Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, 
        michigan.--The Secretary shall review the locally 
        prepared plan for the project for navigation, Traverse 
        City Harbor, Michigan, referred to in subsection 
        (a)(18), and, if the Secretary determines that the plan 
        meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps 
        of Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the 
        Secretary may use the plan to carry out the project and 
        shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the project for the cost of work carried 
        out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.
            (2) Tower harbor, tower minnesota.--The Secretary 
        shall carry out the project for navigation, Tower 
        Harbor, Tower, Minnesota, referred to in subsection 
        (a)(19) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        feasible.

SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                    ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is appropriate, may carry out the project under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a):
            (1) Ballona creek, los angeles county, 
        california.--Project for improvement of the quality of 
        the environment, Ballona Creek, Los Angeles County, 
        California.
            (2) Ballona lagoon tide gates, marina del rey, 
        california.--Project for improvement of the quality of 
        the environment, Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del 
        Rey, California.
            (3) Ft. george inlet, duval county, florida.--
        Project for improvement of the quality of the 
        environment, Ft. George Inlet, Duval County, Florida.
            (4) Rathbun lake, iowa.--Project for improvement of 
        the quality of the environment, Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
            (5) Smithville lake, missouri.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, 
        Smithville Lake, Missouri.
            (6) Delaware bay, new jersey and delaware.--Project 
        for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
        Delaware Bay, New Jersey and Delaware, for the purpose 
        of oyster restoration.
            (7) Tioga-hammond lakes, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Tioga-
        Hammond Lakes, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is appropriate, may carry out the project under 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Cypress creek, montgomery, alabama.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cypress Creek, 
        Montgomery, Alabama.
            (2) Black lake, alaska.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the head 
        of the Chignik watershed.
            (3) Ben lomond dam, santa cruz, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ben Lomond 
        Dam, Santa Cruz, California.
            (4) Dockweiler bluffs, los angeles county, 
        california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Dockweiler Bluffs, Los Angeles County, California.
            (5) Salt river, california.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Salt River, California.
            (6) San diego river, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, San Diego River, 
        California, including efforts to address aquatic 
        nuisance species.
            (7) Santa rosa creek, santa rosa, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Santa Rosa 
        Creek in the vicinity of the Prince Memorial Greenway, 
        Santa Rosa, California.
            (8) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san 
        joaquin river, california.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel 
        and lower San Joaquin River, California.
            (9) Suisun marsh, san pablo bay, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Suisun 
        Marsh, San Pablo Bay, California.
            (10) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
        california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California, 
        including efforts to address aquatic nuisance species.
            (11) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, 
        Florida.
            (12) Clam bayou and dinkins bayou, sanibel island, 
        florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Clam Bayou and Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
            (13) Mountain park, georgia.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Mountain Park, Georgia.
            (14) Chattahoochee fall line, georgia and 
        alabama.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Chattahoochee Fall Line, Georgia and Alabama.
            (15) Longwood cove, gainesville, georgia.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Longwood Cove, 
        Gainesville, Georgia.
            (16) City park, university lakes, louisiana.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, City Park, 
        University Lakes, Louisiana.
            (17) Lawrence gateway, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration at the Lawrence Gateway 
        quadrant project along the Merrimack and Spicket Rivers 
        in Lawrence, Massachusetts, in accordance with the 
        general conditions established by the project approval 
        of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, 
        including filling abandoned drainage facilities and 
        making improvements to the drainage system on the 
        Lawrence Gateway to prevent continued migration of 
        contaminated sediments into the river systems.
            (18) Milford pond, milford, massachusetts.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Milford Pond, 
        Milford, Massachusetts.
            (19) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, 
        Littleton, Massachusetts.
            (20) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree 
        Brook, Milton, Massachusetts.
            (21) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.
            (22) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, 
        michigan.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Kalamazoo River watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.
            (23) Rush lake, minnesota.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Rush Lake, Minnesota.
            (24) South fork of the crow river, hutchinson, 
        minnesota.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        South Fork of the Crow River, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
            (25) St. louis, missouri.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, St. Louis, Missouri.
            (26) Mobley dam, tongue river, montana.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mobley Dam, Tongue 
        River, Montana.
            (27) S and h dam, tongue river, montana.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, S and H Dam, Tongue 
        River, Montana.
            (28) Vandalia dam, milk river, montana.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Vandalia Dam, Milk 
        River, Montana.
            (29) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, 
        Nevada, including features for fish passage in Washoe 
        County.
            (30) Grover's mill pond, new jersey.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grover's Mill Pond, New 
        Jersey.
            (31) Caldwell county, north carolina.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Caldwell County, North 
        Carolina.
            (32) Mecklenburg county, north carolina.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mecklenburg County, 
        North Carolina.
            (33) Dugway creek, bratenahl, ohio.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, 
        Ohio.
            (34) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, 
        Oregon.
            (35) Beaver creek, beaver and salem, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (36) Cementon dam, lehigh river, pennsylvania.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cementon 
        Dam, Lehigh River, Pennsylvania.
            (37) Ingham spring dam, solebury township, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (38) Saucon creek, northampton county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Saucon Creek, Northampton County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (39) Stillwater lake dam, monroe county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Stillwater Lake Dam, Monroe County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (40) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode 
        Island.
            (41) Wilson branch, cheraw, south carolina.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wilson 
        Branch, Cheraw, South Carolina.
            (42) White river, bethel, vermont.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, 
        Vermont.
            (43) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, College Lake, 
        Lynchburg, Virginia.
    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) Black lake, alaska.--The Secretary shall carry 
        out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Black Lake, Alaska referred to in subsection (a)(2) if 
        the Secretary determines that the project is 
        appropriate.
            (2) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--The maximum 
        amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
        project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Truckee 
        River, Reno, Nevada, referred to in subsection (a)(29) 
        shall be $6,000,000, and the Secretary shall carry out 
        the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        project is appropriate.
            (3) Blackstone river, rhode island.--The Secretary 
        shall carry out the project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island, referred 
        to in subsection (a)(40) if the Secretary determines 
        that the project is appropriate.
            (4) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--The 
        Secretary shall carry out the project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, College Lake, Lynchburg, 
        Virginia, referred to in subsection (a)(43) if the 
        Secretary determines that the project is appropriate.

SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 3 
of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation 
in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property,'' approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g):
            (1) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
            (2) Nicholas canyon, los angeles, california.--
        Project for shoreline protection, Nicholas Canyon, Los 
        Angeles, California.
            (3) Sanibel island, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Sanibel Island, Florida.
            (4) Apra harbor, guam.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Apra Harbor, Guam.
            (5) Piti, cabras island, guam.--Project for 
        shoreline protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam.
            (6) Narrows and gravesend bay, upper new york bay, 
        brooklyn, new york.--Project for shoreline protection 
        in the vicinity of the confluence of the Narrows and 
        Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, Shore Parkway 
        Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
            (7) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Delaware River in the vicinity of the Philadelphia 
        Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania.
            (8) Port aransas, texas.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Port Aransas, Texas.

SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following 
project and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project under section 
2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g): 
Project for removal of snags and clearing and straightening of 
channels for flood control, Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson 
River, New Windsor, New York.

SEC. 1009. SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DAMAGE CAUSED BY 
                    NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i):
            (1) Tybee Island, Georgia.
            (2) Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.

SEC. 1010. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
project for aquatic nuisance plant control in the Republican 
River Basin, Nebraska, under section 104 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610).
    (b) Special Rule.--In carrying out the project under 
subsection (a), the Secretary may control and eradicate 
riverine nuisance plants.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
            ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess 
        contributions.--The Secretary may not--
                    ``(A) solicit contributions from non-
                Federal interests for costs of constructing 
                authorized water resources projects or measures 
                in excess of the non-Federal share assigned to 
                the appropriate project purposes listed in 
                subsections (a), (b), and (c); or
                    ``(B) condition Federal participation in 
                such projects or measures on the receipt of 
                such contributions.
            ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--
        Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to affect 
        the Secretary's authority under section 903(c).''.

SEC. 2002. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 
Stat. 318; 120 Stat. 3197) is amended by striking ``2008'' and 
inserting ``2009''.

SEC. 2003. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``sec. 221.'' and inserting the 
        following:

``SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES 
                    PROJECTS.'';

            (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
            ``(1) In general.--After December 31, 1970, the 
        construction of any water resources project, or an 
        acceptable separable element thereof, by the Secretary 
        of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, or 
        by a non-Federal interest where such interest will be 
        reimbursed for such construction under any provision of 
        law, shall not be commenced until each non-Federal 
        interest has entered into a written partnership 
        agreement with the Secretary (or, where appropriate, 
        the district engineer for the district in which the 
        project will be carried out) under which each party 
        agrees to carry out its responsibilities and 
        requirements for implementation or construction of the 
        project or the appropriate element of the project, as 
        the case may be; except that no such agreement shall be 
        required if the Secretary determines that the 
        administrative costs associated with negotiating, 
        executing, or administering the agreement would exceed 
        the amount of the contribution required from the non-
        Federal interest and are less than $25,000.
            ``(2) Liquidated damages.--A partnership agreement 
        described in paragraph (1) may include a provision for 
        liquidated damages in the event of a failure of one or 
        more parties to perform.
            ``(3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any 
        partnership agreement described in paragraph (1) and 
        entered into by a State, or a body politic of the State 
        which derives its powers from the State constitution, 
        or a governmental entity created by the State 
        legislature, the agreement may reflect that it does not 
        obligate future appropriations for such performance and 
        payment when obligating future appropriations would be 
        inconsistent with constitutional or statutory 
        limitations of the State or a political subdivision of 
        the State.
            ``(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A partnership agreement 
                described in paragraph (1) may provide with 
                respect to a project that the Secretary shall 
                credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
                of the project, including a project implemented 
                without specific authorization in law, the 
                value of in-kind contributions made by the non-
                Federal interest, including--
                            ``(i) the costs of planning 
                        (including data collection), design, 
                        management, mitigation, construction, 
                        and construction services that are 
                        provided by the non-Federal interest 
                        for implementation of the project;
                            ``(ii) the value of materials or 
                        services provided before execution of 
                        the partnership agreement, including 
                        efforts on constructed elements 
                        incorporated into the project; and
                            ``(iii) the value of materials and 
                        services provided after execution of 
                        the partnership agreement.
                    ``(B) Condition.--The Secretary may credit 
                an in-kind contribution under subparagraph (A) 
                only if the Secretary determines that the 
                material or service provided as an in-kind 
                contribution is integral to the project.
                    ``(C) Work performed before partnership 
                agreement.--In any case in which the non-
                Federal interest is to receive credit under 
                subparagraph (A)(ii) for the cost of work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest and 
                such work has not been carried out as of the 
                date of enactment of this subparagraph, the 
                Secretary and the non-Federal interest shall 
                enter into an agreement under which the non-
                Federal interest shall carry out such work, and 
                only work carried out following the execution 
                of the agreement shall be eligible for credit.
                    ``(D) Limitations.--Credit authorized under 
                this paragraph for a project--
                            ``(i) shall not exceed the non-
                        Federal share of the cost of the 
                        project;
                            ``(ii) shall not alter any other 
                        requirement that a non-Federal interest 
                        provide lands, easements, relocations, 
                        rights-of-way, or areas for disposal of 
                        dredged material for the project;
                            ``(iii) shall not alter any 
                        requirement that a non-Federal interest 
                        pay a portion of the costs of 
                        construction of the project under 
                        sections 101 and 103 of the Water 
                        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                        U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 2213); and
                            ``(iv) shall not exceed the actual 
                        and reasonable costs of the materials, 
                        services, or other things provided by 
                        the non-Federal interest, as determined 
                        by the Secretary.
                    ``(E) Applicability.--
                            ``(i) In general.--This paragraph 
                        shall apply to water resources projects 
                        authorized after November 16, 1986, 
                        including projects initiated after 
                        November 16, 1986, without specific 
                        authorization in law.
                            ``(ii) Limitation.--In any case in 
                        which a specific provision of law 
                        provides for a non-Federal interest to 
                        receive credit toward the non-Federal 
                        share of the cost of a study for, or 
                        construction or operation and 
                        maintenance of, a water resources 
                        project, the specific provision of law 
                        shall apply instead of this 
                        paragraph.''.
    (b) Non-Federal Interest.--Section 221(b) of such Act is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--The term `non-
Federal interest' means--
            ``(1) a legally constituted public body (including 
        a federally recognized Indian tribe); or
            ``(2) a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
        affected local government,
that has full authority and capability to perform the terms of 
its agreement and to pay damages, if necessary, in the event of 
failure to perform.''.
    (c) Program Administration.--Section 221 of such Act is 
further amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection 
        (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the 
        following:
    ``(e) Delegation of Authority.--Not later than June 30, 
2008, the Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for 
partnership agreements that delegate to the district engineers, 
at a minimum--
            ``(1) the authority to approve any policy in a 
        partnership agreement that has appeared in an agreement 
        previously approved by the Secretary;
            ``(2) the authority to approve any policy in a 
        partnership agreement the specific terms of which are 
        dictated by law or by a final feasibility study, final 
        environmental impact statement, or other final decision 
        document for a water resources project;
            ``(3) the authority to approve any partnership 
        agreement that complies with the policies and 
        guidelines issued by the Secretary; and
            ``(4) the authority to sign any partnership 
        agreement for any water resources project unless, 
        within 30 days of the date of authorization of the 
        project, the Secretary notifies the district engineer 
        in which the project will be carried out that the 
        Secretary wishes to retain the prerogative to sign the 
        partnership agreement for that project.
    ``(f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this subsection, and every year 
thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
detailing the following:
            ``(1) The number of partnership agreements signed 
        by district engineers and the number of partnership 
        agreements signed by the Secretary.
            ``(2) For any partnership agreement signed by the 
        Secretary, an explanation of why delegation to the 
        district engineer was not appropriate.
    ``(g) Public Availability.--Not later than 120 days after 
the date of enactment of this subsection, the Chief of 
Engineers shall--
            ``(1) ensure that each district engineer has made 
        available to the public, including on the Internet, all 
        partnership agreements entered into under this section 
        within the preceding 10 years and all partnership 
        agreements for water resources projects currently being 
        carried out in that district; and
            ``(2) make each partnership agreement entered into 
        after such date of enactment available to the public, 
        including on the Internet, not later than 7 days after 
        the date on which such agreement is entered into.''.
    (d) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 4190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place 
                it appears and inserting ``may''; and
                    (B) by striking the last sentence; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' 
                the following: ``payment of damages or, for'';
                    (B) by striking ``to collect a civil 
                penalty imposed under this section,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed 
                under this section,'' and inserting ``any 
                damages,''.
    (e) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), 
(b), and (d) only apply to partnership agreements entered into 
after the date of enactment of this Act; except that, at the 
request of a non-Federal interest for a project, the district 
engineer for the district in which the project is located may 
amend a project partnership agreement entered into on or before 
such date and under which construction on the project has not 
been initiated as of such date of enactment for the purpose of 
incorporating such amendments.
    (f) Agreements and References.--
            (1) In general.--A goal of agreements entered into 
        under section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
        U.S.C. 1962d-5b) shall be to further partnership and 
        cooperation, and the agreements shall be referred to as 
        ``partnership agreements''.
            (2) References to cooperation agreements.--Any 
        reference in a law, regulation, document, or other 
        paper of the United States to a ``cooperation 
        agreement'' or ``project cooperation agreement'' shall 
        be deemed to be a reference to a ``partnership 
        agreement'' or a ``project partnership agreement'', 
        respectively.
            (3) References to partnership agreements.--Any 
        reference to a ``partnership agreement'' or ``project 
        partnership agreement'' in this Act (other than this 
        section) shall be deemed to be a reference to a 
        ``cooperation agreement'' or a ``project cooperation 
        agreement'', respectively.

SEC. 2004. COMPILATION OF LAWS.

    (a) Compilation of Laws Enacted After November 8, 1966.--
The Secretary and the Chief of Engineers shall prepare a 
compilation of the laws of the United States relating to the 
improvement of rivers and harbors, flood damage reduction, 
beach and shoreline erosion, hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, ecosystem and environmental restoration, and other 
water resources development enacted after November 8, 1966, and 
before January 1, 2008, and have such compilation printed for 
the use of the Department of the Army, Congress, and the 
general public.
    (b) Reprint of Laws Enacted Before November 8, 1966.--The 
Secretary shall have the volumes containing the laws referred 
to in subsection (a) enacted before November 8, 1966, 
reprinted.
    (c) Index.--The Secretary shall include an index in each 
volume compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this 
section.
    (d) Congressional Copies.--Not later than April 1, 2008, 
the Secretary shall transmit at least 25 copies of each volume 
compiled, and of each volume reprinted, pursuant to this 
section to each of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
    (e) Availability.--The Secretary shall ensure that each 
volume compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this 
section are available through electronic means, including on 
the Internet.

SEC. 2005. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2326a) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection 
        (d);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the 
        following:
    ``(c) Dredged Material Facility.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into a 
        partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with one or 
        more non-Federal interests with respect to a water 
        resources project, or group of water resources projects 
        within a geographic region, if appropriate, for the 
        acquisition, design, construction, management, or 
        operation of a dredged material processing, treatment, 
        contaminant reduction, or disposal facility (including 
        any facility used to demonstrate potential beneficial 
        uses of dredged material, which may include effective 
        sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using 
        funds provided in whole or in part by the Federal 
        Government.
            ``(2) Performance.--One or more of the parties to a 
        partnership agreement under this subsection may perform 
        the acquisition, design, construction, management, or 
        operation of a dredged material processing, treatment, 
        contaminant reduction, or disposal facility.
            ``(3) Multiple projects.--If appropriate, the 
        Secretary may combine portions of separate water 
        resources projects with appropriate combined cost-
        sharing among the various water resources projects in a 
        partnership agreement for a facility under this 
        subsection if the facility serves to manage dredged 
        material from multiple water resources projects located 
        in the geographic region of the facility.
            ``(4) Specified federal funding sources and cost 
        sharing.--
                    ``(A) Specified federal funding.--A 
                partnership agreement with respect to a 
                facility under this subsection shall specify--
                            ``(i) the Federal funding sources 
                        and combined cost-sharing when 
                        applicable to multiple water resources 
                        projects; and
                            ``(ii) the responsibilities and 
                        risks of each of the parties relating 
                        to present and future dredged material 
                        managed by the facility.
                    ``(B) Management of sediments.--
                            ``(i) In general.--A partnership 
                        agreement under this subsection may 
                        include the management of sediments 
                        from the maintenance dredging of 
                        Federal water resources projects that 
                        do not have partnership agreements.
                            ``(ii) Payments.--A partnership 
                        agreement under this subsection may 
                        allow the non-Federal interest to 
                        receive reimbursable payments from the 
                        Federal Government for commitments made 
                        by the non-Federal interest for 
                        disposal or placement capacity at 
                        dredged material processing, treatment, 
                        contaminant reduction, or disposal 
                        facilities.
                    ``(C) Credit.--A partnership agreement 
                under this subsection may allow costs incurred 
                by the non-Federal interest before execution of 
                the partnership agreement to be credited in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
            ``(5) Credit.--
                    ``(A) Effect on existing agreements.--
                Nothing in this subsection supersedes or 
                modifies an agreement in effect on the date of 
                enactment of this paragraph between the Federal 
                Government and any non-Federal interest for the 
                cost-sharing, construction, and operation and 
                maintenance of a water resources project.
                    ``(B) Credit for funds.--Subject to the 
                approval of the Secretary and in accordance 
                with law (including regulations and policies) 
                in effect on the date of enactment of this 
                paragraph, a non-Federal interest for a water 
                resources project may receive credit for funds 
                provided for the acquisition, design, 
                construction, management, or operation of a 
                dredged material processing, treatment, 
                contaminant reduction, or disposal facility to 
                the extent the facility is used to manage 
                dredged material from the project.
                    ``(C) Non-federal interest 
                responsibilities.--A non-Federal interest 
                entering into a partnership agreement under 
                this subsection for a facility shall--
                            ``(i) be responsible for providing 
                        all necessary lands, easements, 
                        relocations, and rights-of-way 
                        associated with the facility; and
                            ``(ii) receive credit toward the 
                        non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                        project with respect to which the 
                        agreement is being entered into for 
                        those items.''; and
            (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) 
        (as redesignated by paragraph (1))--
                    (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after 
                ``operation'' each place it appears; and
                    (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, 
                contaminant reduction, or'' after ``dredged 
                material'' the first place it appears in each 
                of those paragraphs.

SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and 
navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project 
without the need to demonstrate that the project is justified 
solely by national economic development benefits if the 
Secretary determines that--
            (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is 
        at least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible 
        commercial port and has no direct rail or highway link 
        to another community served by a surface accessible 
        port or harbor; or
            (B) the project would be located in the State of 
        Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the 
        Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the 
        United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa;
            (2) the harbor is economically critical such that 
        over 80 percent of the goods transported through the 
        harbor would be consumed within the community served by 
        the harbor and navigation improvement; and
            (3) the long-term viability of the community would 
        be threatened without the harbor and navigation 
        improvement.
    (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a 
project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the 
benefits of the project to--
            (1) public health and safety of the local 
        community, including access to facilities designed to 
        protect public health and safety;
            (2) access to natural resources for subsistence 
        purposes;
            (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
            (4) welfare of the local population; and
            (5) social and cultural value to the community.

SEC. 2007. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS.

    The non-Federal interest for a water resources study or 
project may use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided 
by a Federal agency under any other Federal program, to 
satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the study or project if the Federal agency that provides the 
funds determines that the funds are authorized to be used to 
carry out the study or project.

SEC. 2008. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; COST SHARING.

    (a) Federal Allocation.--Upon authorization by law of an 
increase in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
allocated for a water resources project or an increase in the 
total cost of a water resources project authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary, the Secretary shall enter into a 
revised partnership agreement for the project to take into 
account the change in Federal participation in the project.
    (b)  Cost Sharing.--An increase in the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be allocated for a water resources 
project, or an increase in the total cost of a water resources 
project, authorized to be carried out by the Secretary shall 
not affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the 
project.
    (c) Cost Estimates.--The estimated Federal and non-Federal 
costs of water resources projects authorized to be carried out 
by the Secretary before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
this Act are for informational purposes only and shall not be 
interpreted as affecting the cost-sharing responsibilities 
established by law.

SEC. 2009. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, 
design, and construction of any project for flood damage 
reduction for an area that, within the preceding 5 years, has 
been subject to flooding that resulted in the loss of life and 
caused damage of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a 
declaration of a major disaster by the President under the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 
(42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

SEC. 2010. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of 
                paragraph (4);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                paragraph (5) and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio;
            ``(7) Sauk River Basin, Snohomish and Skagit 
        Counties, Washington;
            ``(8) Niagara River Basin, New York;
            ``(9) Genesee River Basin, New York; and
            ``(10) White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
        the costs of an assessment carried out under this 
        section on or after December 11, 2000, shall be 25 
        percent.''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (g).

SEC. 2011. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) Program.--Section 203(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269(b); 114 Stat. 2589) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``carry out 
        water-related planning activities and'' after ``the 
        Secretary may'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting after ``Code'' 
        the following: ``, and including lands that are within 
        the jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as 
        determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are 
        recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as eligible 
        for trust land status under part 151 of title 25, Code 
        of Federal Regulations''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of 
                subparagraph (A);
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 
                subparagraph (C); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
                following:
                    ``(B) watershed assessments and planning 
                activities; and''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 203(e) of 
such Act is amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting 
``2012''.

SEC. 2012. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

    Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 
Stat. 1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the 
Army,'' after ``the Secretary of Energy,''.

SEC. 2013. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``The Secretary'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
            ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
            (2) by inserting after the last sentence in 
        subsection (a) the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--At the request of a 
                governmental agency or non-Federal interest, 
                the Secretary may provide, at Federal expense, 
                technical assistance to such agency or non-
                Federal interest in managing water resources.
                    ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical 
                assistance under this paragraph may include 
                provision and integration of hydrologic, 
                economic, and environmental data and 
                analyses.'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this 
        section'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``subsection (a)(1)'';
            (4) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``Up to \1/2\ 
        of the'' and inserting ``The'';
            (5) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
            (6) in subsection (c)(1) (as designated by 
        paragraph (5))--
                    (A) by striking ``the provisions of this 
                section'' and inserting ``subsection (a)(1),''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting 
                ``$2,000,000'';
            (7) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the 
        following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out 
        subsection (a)(2), of which not more than $2,000,000 
        annually may be used by the Secretary to enter into 
        cooperative agreements with nonprofit organizations to 
        provide assistance to rural and small communities.'';
            (8) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection 
        (e); and
            (9) by inserting after subsection (c) the 
        following:
    ``(d) Annual Submission of Proposed Activities.--Concurrent 
with the President's submission to Congress of the President's 
request for appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a 
fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate a report describing the individual 
activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
that fiscal year.''.

SEC. 2014. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
        (19) and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, 
        removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
        address excessive sedimentation;
            ``(21) McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New 
        Jersey, removal of silt and measures to address water 
        quality;
            ``(22) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, 
        removal of silt and restoration of structural 
        integrity;
            ``(23) Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey, 
        removal of silt and aquatic growth;
            ``(24) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, 
        removal of silt and excessive nutrients and restoration 
        of structural integrity;
            ``(25) Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and measures to address 
        excessive sedimentation;
            ``(26) Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania;
            ``(27) Lake Fairlee, Vermont, removal of silt and 
        aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation; and
            ``(28) Lake Morley, Vermont, removal of silt and 
        aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation.''.

SEC. 2015. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-
effective design and construction of wetlands restoration that 
is part of an authorized water resources project, the Secretary 
may enter into cooperative agreements under section 6305 of 
title 31, United States Code, with nonprofit organizations with 
expertise in wetlands restoration to carry out such design and 
construction on behalf of the Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--
            (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement 
        under this section may not obligate the Secretary to 
        pay the nonprofit organization more than $1,000,000 for 
        any single wetlands restoration project.
            (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried 
        out under cooperative agreements under this section may 
        not exceed $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.

SEC. 2016. TRAINING FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals not 
employed by the Department of the Army in training classes and 
courses offered by the Corps of Engineers in any case in which 
the Secretary determines that it is in the best interest of the 
Federal Government to include those individuals as 
participants.
    (b) Expenses.--
            (1) In general.--An individual not employed by the 
        Department of the Army attending a training class or 
        course described in subsection (a) shall pay the full 
        cost of the training provided to the individual.
            (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for 
        training received under paragraph (1), up to the actual 
        cost of the training--
                    (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
                    (B) shall be credited to an appropriations 
                account used for paying training costs; and
                    (C) shall be available for use by the 
                Secretary, without further appropriation, for 
                training purposes.
            (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under 
        paragraph (2) that are in excess of the actual cost of 
        training provided shall be credited as miscellaneous 
        receipts to the Treasury of the United States.

SEC. 2017. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a program to 
provide public access to water resources and related water 
quality data in the custody of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated 
        in water resources project development and regulation 
        under section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
        Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); and
            (2) appropriately employ geographic information 
        system technology and linkages to water resource models 
        and analytical techniques.
    (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in 
carrying out activities under this section, the Secretary shall 
develop partnerships, including cooperative agreements, with 
State, tribal, and local governments and other Federal 
agencies.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for 
each fiscal year.

SEC. 2018. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 
(33 U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, it 
is the policy of the United States to promote beach nourishment 
for the purposes of flood damage reduction and hurricane and 
storm damage reduction and related research that encourage the 
protection, restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, 
including beach restoration and periodic beach renourishment 
for a period of 50 years, on a comprehensive and coordinated 
basis by the Federal Government, States, localities, and 
private enterprises.
    (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy under 
subsection (a), preference shall be given to--
            (1) areas in which there has been a Federal 
        investment of funds for the purposes described in 
        subsection (a); and
            (2) areas with respect to which the need for 
        prevention or mitigation of damage to shores and 
        beaches is attributable to Federal navigation projects 
        or other Federal activities.
    (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy 
under subsection (a) to each shore protection and beach 
renourishment project (including shore protection and beach 
renourishment projects constructed before the date of enactment 
of this Act).

SEC. 2019. ABILITY TO PAY.

    (a) Criteria and Procedures.--Section 103(m)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(2)) 
is amended by striking ``180 days after such date of 
enactment'' and inserting ``December 31, 2007''.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall apply the criteria and 
procedures referred to in section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) to the following 
projects:
            (1) St. johns bayou and new madrid floodway, 
        missouri.--The project for flood control, St. Johns 
        Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri, authorized by 
        section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).
            (2) Lower rio grande basin, texas.--The project for 
        flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, 
        authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125).
            (3) West virginia and pennsylvania projects.--The 
        projects for flood control authorized by section 581 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
        3790-3791).

SEC. 2020. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) General Authority.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a 
        project to restore and protect an aquatic ecosystem or 
        estuary if the Secretary determines that the project--
                    ``(A)(i) will improve the quality of the 
                environment and is in the public interest; or
                    ``(ii) will improve the elements and 
                features of an estuary (as defined in section 
                103 of the Estuaries and Clean Waters Act of 
                2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902)); and
                    ``(B) is cost-effective.
            ``(2) Dam removal.--A project under this section 
        may include removal of a dam.''; and
            (2) in subsection (e) by striking ``$25,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$50,000,000''.

SEC. 2021. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s) is amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting 
``$55,000,000''.

SEC. 2022. SMALL RIVER AND HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.

    Section 107(b) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577(b)) is amended by striking ``$4,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$7,000,000''.

SEC. 2023. PROTECTION OF HIGHWAYS, BRIDGE APPROACHES, PUBLIC WORKS, AND 
                    NONPROFIT PUBLIC SERVICES.

    Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
701r) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$1,500,000''.

SEC. 2024. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
                    THE ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(h)) is amended by striking 
``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''.

SEC. 2025. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES.

    Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (33 U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking ``$7,500,000'' 
and inserting ``$20,000,000''.

SEC. 2026. LEASING AUTHORITY.

    Section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for 
flood control, and other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 
(16 U.S.C. 460d), is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian 
        tribes and'' before ``Federal'' the first place it 
        appears;
            (2) by inserting ``Indian tribes or'' after 
        ``considerations, to such''; and
            (3) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian 
        tribe'' after ``That in any such lease or license to 
        a''.

SEC. 2027. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT.

    (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each 
year beginning January 2008, the Chief of Engineers shall 
submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives a report on--
            (1) the expenditures by the Corps for the preceding 
        fiscal year and estimated expenditures by the Corps for 
        the current fiscal year; and
            (2) for projects and activities that are not 
        scheduled for completion in the current fiscal year, 
        the estimated expenditures by the Corps necessary in 
        the following fiscal year for each project or activity 
        to maintain the same level of effort being achieved in 
        the current fiscal year.
    (b) Contents.--In addition to the information described in 
subsection (a), the report shall contain a detailed accounting 
of the following information:
            (1) With respect to activities carried out with 
        funding provided under the Construction appropriations 
        account for the Secretary, information on--
                    (A) projects currently under construction, 
                including--
                            (i) allocations to date;
                            (ii) the number of years remaining 
                        to complete construction;
                            (iii) the estimated annual Federal 
                        cost to maintain that construction 
                        schedule; and
                            (iv) a list of projects the Corps 
                        of Engineers expects to complete during 
                        the current fiscal year; and
                    (B) projects for which there is a signed 
                partnership agreement and completed planning, 
                engineering, and design, including--
                            (i) the number of years the project 
                        is expected to require for completion; 
                        and
                            (ii) estimated annual Federal cost 
                        to maintain that construction schedule.
            (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of 
        the inland and intracoastal waterways identified by 
        section 206 of the Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978 
        (33 U.S.C. 1804)--
                    (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain 
                each waterway for the authorized reach and at 
                the authorized depth;
                    (B) the estimated annual cost of operation 
                and maintenance of locks and dams to ensure 
                navigation without interruption; and
                    (C) the actual expenditures to maintain 
                each waterway.
            (3) With respect to activities carried out with 
        funding provided under the Investigations 
        appropriations account for the Secretary--
                    (A) the number of active studies;
                    (B) the number of completed studies not yet 
                authorized for construction;
                    (C) the number of initiated studies; and
                    (D) the number of studies expected to be 
                completed during the fiscal year.
            (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be 
        received for interagency and international support 
        activities under section 234 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2323a).
            (5) Recreation fees and lease payments.
            (6) Hydropower and water storage receipts.
            (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterways Trust Fund 
        and the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
            (8) Other revenues and fees collected by the Corps 
        of Engineers.
            (9) With respect to permit applications and 
        notifications, a list of individual permit applications 
        and nationwide permit notifications, including--
                    (A) the date on which each permit 
                application is filed;
                    (B) the date on which each permit 
                application is determined to be complete;
                    (C) the date on which any permit 
                application is withdrawn; and
                    (D) the date on which the Corps of 
                Engineers grants or denies each permit.
            (10) With respect to projects that are authorized 
        but for which construction is not complete, a list of 
        such projects for which no funds have been allocated 
        for the 5 preceding fiscal years, including, for each 
        project--
                    (A) the authorization date;
                    (B) the last allocation date;
                    (C) the percentage of construction 
                completed;
                    (D) the estimated cost remaining until 
                completion of the project; and
                    (E) a brief explanation of the reasons for 
                the delay.

SEC. 2028. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2361 of title 10, 
United States Code, the Secretary may provide assistance 
through contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants to--
            (1) the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 
        Tennessee, for establishment and operation of the 
        Southeastern Water Resources Institute to study 
        sustainable development and utilization of water 
        resources in the southeastern United States;
            (2) Lewis and Clark Community College, Illinois, 
        for the Great Rivers National Research and Education 
        Center (including facilities that have been or will be 
        constructed at one or more locations in the vicinity of 
        the confluence of the Illinois River, the Missouri 
        River, and the Mississippi River), a collaborative 
        effort of Lewis and Clark Community College, the 
        University of Illinois, the Illinois Department of 
        Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, and other 
        entities, for the study of river ecology, developing 
        watershed and river management strategies, and 
        educating students and the public on river issues; and
            (3) the University of Texas at Dallas for support 
        and operation of the International Center for Decision 
        and Risk Analysis to study risk analysis and control 
        methods for transboundary water resources management in 
        the southwestern United States and other international 
        water resources management problems.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection 
(a)(1) $2,000,000, to carry out subsection (a)(2) $2,000,000, 
and to carry out subsection (a)(3) $5,000,000.

SEC. 2029. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
                    OF HARBOR DREDGING PROJECTS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Insufficient maintenance dredging results in 
        inefficient water transportation and harmful economic 
        consequences.
            (2) The estimated dredging backlog at commercial 
        harbors in the Great Lakes alone is 16,000,000 cubic 
        yards.
            (3) Approximately two-thirds of all shipping in the 
        United States either starts or finishes at small 
        harbors.
            (4) Small harbors often have a greater proportional 
        impact on local economies than do larger harbors.
            (5) Performance metrics can be valuable tools in 
        the budget process for water resources projects.
            (6) The use of a single performance metric for 
        water resources projects can result in a budget biased 
        against small and rural communities.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
the operations and maintenance budget of the Corps of Engineers 
should reflect the use of all available economic data, rather 
than a single performance metric.

SEC. 2030. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

    Section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2323a) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities 
(including contracting) in support of other Federal agencies, 
international organizations, or foreign governments to address 
problems of national significance to the United States.'';
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``Secretary of 
        State'' and inserting ``Department of State''; and
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``$250,000 for fiscal year 
                2001'' and inserting ``$1,000,000 for fiscal 
                year 2008''; and
                    (B) by striking ``or international 
                organizations'' and inserting ``, international 
                organizations, or foreign governments''.

SEC. 2031. WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES.

    (a) National Water Resources Planning Policy.--It is the 
policy of the United States that all water resources projects 
should reflect national priorities, encourage economic 
development, and protect the environment by--
            (1) seeking to maximize sustainable economic 
        development;
            (2) seeking to avoid the unwise use of floodplains 
        and flood-prone areas and minimizing adverse impacts 
        and vulnerabilities in any case in which a floodplain 
        or flood-prone area must be used; and
            (3) protecting and restoring the functions of 
        natural systems and mitigating any unavoidable damage 
        to natural systems.
    (b) Principles and Guidelines.--
            (1) Principles and guidelines defined.--In this 
        subsection, the term ``principles and guidelines'' 
        means the principles and guidelines contained in the 
        document prepared by the Water Resources Council 
        pursuant to section 103 of the Water Resources Planning 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 1962a-2), entitled ``Economic and 
        Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and 
        Related Land Resources Implementation Studies'', and 
        dated March 10, 1983.
            (2) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        issue revisions, consistent with paragraph (3), to the 
        principles and guidelines for use by the Secretary in 
        the formulation, evaluation, and implementation of 
        water resources projects.
            (3) Considerations.--In developing revisions to the 
        principles and guidelines under paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall evaluate the consistency of the 
        principles and guidelines with, and ensure that the 
        principles and guidelines address, the following:
                    (A) The use of best available economic 
                principles and analytical techniques, including 
                techniques in risk and uncertainty analysis.
                    (B) The assessment and incorporation of 
                public safety in the formulation of 
                alternatives and recommended plans.
                    (C) Assessment methods that reflect the 
                value of projects for low-income communities 
                and projects that use nonstructural approaches 
                to water resources development and management.
                    (D) The assessment and evaluation of the 
                interaction of a project with other water 
                resources projects and programs within a region 
                or watershed.
                    (E) The use of contemporary water resources 
                paradigms, including integrated water resources 
                management and adaptive management.
                    (F) Evaluation methods that ensure that 
                water resources projects are justified by 
                public benefits.
            (4) Consultation and public participation.--In 
        carrying out paragraph (2), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) consult with the Secretary of the 
                Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the 
                Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Housing 
                and Urban Development, the Secretary of 
                Transportation, the Administrator of the 
                Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary 
                of Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, 
                the National Academy of Sciences, and the 
                Council on Environmental Quality; and
                    (B) solicit and consider public and expert 
                comments.
            (5) Publication.--The Secretary shall--
                    (A) submit to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives copies of--
                            (i) the revisions to the principles 
                        and guidelines for use by the 
                        Secretary; and
                            (ii) an explanation of the intent 
                        of each revision, how each revision is 
                        consistent with this section, and the 
                        probable impact of each revision on 
                        water resources projects carried out by 
                        the Secretary; and
                    (B) make the revisions to the principles 
                and guidelines for use by the Secretary 
                available to the public, including on the 
                Internet.
            (6) Effect.--Subject to the requirements of this 
        subsection, the principles and guidelines as revised 
        under this subsection shall apply to water resources 
        projects carried out by the Secretary instead of the 
        principles and guidelines for such projects in effect 
        on the day before date of enactment of this Act.
            (7) Applicability.--After the date of issuance of 
        the revisions to the principles and guidelines, the 
        revisions shall apply--
                    (A) to all water resources projects carried 
                out by the Secretary, other than projects for 
                which the Secretary has commenced a feasibility 
                study before the date of such issuance;
                    (B) at the request of a non-Federal 
                interest, to a water resources project for 
                which the Secretary has commenced a feasibility 
                study before the date of such issuance; and
                    (C) to the reevaluation or modification of 
                a water resources project, other than a 
                reevaluation or modification that has been 
                commenced by the Secretary before the date of 
                such issuance.
            (8) Existing studies.--Revisions to the principles 
        and guidelines issued under paragraph (2) shall not 
        affect the validity of any completed study of a water 
        resources project.
            (9) Recommendation.--Upon completion of the 
        revisions to the principles and guidelines for use by 
        the Secretary, the Secretary shall make a 
        recommendation to Congress as to the advisability of 
        repealing subsections (a) and (b) of section 80 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-17).

SEC. 2032. WATER RESOURCE PRIORITIES REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a 
report describing the vulnerability of the United States to 
damage from flooding, including--
            (1) the risk to human life;
            (2) the risk to property; and
            (3) the comparative risks faced by different 
        regions of the United States.
    (b) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (a) shall 
include--
            (1) an assessment of the extent to which programs 
        in the United States relating to flooding address flood 
        risk reduction priorities;
            (2) the extent to which those programs may be 
        encouraging development and economic activity in flood-
        prone areas;
            (3) recommendations for improving those programs 
        with respect to reducing and responding to flood risks; 
        and
            (4) proposals for implementing the recommendations.

SEC. 2033. PLANNING.

    (a) Matters to Be Addressed in Planning.--Section 904 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Enhancing'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) In General.--Enhancing''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Assessments.--For all feasibility reports for water 
resources projects completed after December 31, 2007, the 
Secretary shall assess whether--
            ``(1) the water resources project and each 
        separable element is cost-effective; and
            ``(2) the water resources project complies with 
        Federal, State, and local laws (including regulations) 
        and public policies.''.
    (b) Planning Process Improvements.--The Chief of 
Engineers--
            (1) shall adopt a risk analysis approach to project 
        cost estimates for water resources projects; and
            (2) not later than one year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, shall--
                    (A) issue procedures for risk analysis for 
                cost estimation for water resources projects; 
                and
                    (B) submit to Congress a report that 
                includes any recommended amendments to section 
                902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280).
    (c) Benchmarks.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 12 months after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Chief of Engineers 
        shall establish benchmarks for determining the length 
        of time it should take to conduct a feasibility study 
        for a water resources project and its associated review 
        process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 
        1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Chief of Engineers 
        shall use such benchmarks as a management tool to make 
        the feasibility study process more efficient in all 
        districts of the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Benchmark goals.--The Chief of Engineers shall 
        establish, to the extent practicable, under paragraph 
        (1) benchmark goals for completion of feasibility 
        studies for water resources projects generally within 2 
        years. In the case of feasibility studies that the 
        Chief of Engineers determines may require additional 
        time based on the project type, size, cost, or 
        complexity, the benchmark goal for completion shall be 
        generally within 4 years.
     (d) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage 
Reduction Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for 
flood damage reduction shall include, as part of the 
calculation of benefits and costs--
            (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding 
        following completion of the proposed project;
            (2) a calculation of the residual risk of loss of 
        human life and residual risk to human safety following 
        completion of the proposed project;
            (3) a calculation of any upstream or downstream 
        impacts of the proposed project; and
            (4) calculations to ensure that the benefits and 
        costs associated with structural and nonstructural 
        alternatives are evaluated in an equitable manner.
    (e) Centers of Specialized Planning Expertise.--
            (1) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish 
        centers of expertise to provide specialized planning 
        expertise for water resources projects to be carried 
        out by the Secretary in order to enhance and supplement 
        the capabilities of the districts of the Corps of 
        Engineers.
            (2) Duties.--A center of expertise established 
        under this subsection shall--
                    (A) provide technical and managerial 
                assistance to district commanders of the Corps 
                of Engineers for project planning, development, 
                and implementation;
                    (B) provide agency peer reviews of new 
                major scientific, engineering, or economic 
                methods, models, or analyses that will be used 
                to support decisions of the Secretary with 
                respect to feasibility studies for water 
                resources projects;
                    (C) provide support for independent peer 
                review panels under section 2034; and
                    (D) carry out such other duties as are 
                prescribed by the Secretary.
    (f) Completion of Corps of Engineers Reports.--
            (1) Alternatives.--
                    (A) In general.--Feasibility and other 
                studies and assessments for a water resources 
                project shall include recommendations for 
                alternatives--
                            (i) that, as determined in 
                        coordination with the non-Federal 
                        interest for the project, promote 
                        integrated water resources management; 
                        and
                            (ii) for which the non-Federal 
                        interest is willing to provide the non-
                        Federal share for the studies or 
                        assessments.
                    (B) Constraints.--The alternatives 
                contained in studies and assessments described 
                in subparagraph (A) shall not be constrained by 
                budgetary or other policy.
                    (C) Reports of chief of engineers.--The 
                reports of the Chief of Engineers shall 
                identify any recommendation that is not the 
                best technical solution to water resource needs 
                and problems and the reason for the deviation.
            (2) Report completion.--The completion of a report 
        of the Chief of Engineers for a water resources 
        project--
                    (A) shall not be delayed while 
                consideration is being given to potential 
                changes in policy or priority for project 
                consideration; and
                    (B) shall be submitted, on completion, to--
                            (i) the Committee on Environment 
                        and Public Works of the Senate; and
                            (ii) the Committee on 
                        Transportation and Infrastructure of 
                        the House of Representatives.
    (g) Completion Review.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), not later than 120 days after the date of 
        completion of a report of the Chief of Engineers that 
        recommends to Congress a water resources project, the 
        Secretary shall--
                    (A) review the report; and
                    (B) provide any recommendations of the 
                Secretary regarding the water resources project 
                to Congress.
            (2) Prior reports.--Not later than 180 days after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, with respect to any 
        report of the Chief of Engineers recommending a water 
        resources project that is complete prior to the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete 
        review of, and provide recommendations to Congress for, 
        the report in accordance with paragraph (1).

SEC. 2034. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
            (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject 
        to a peer review by an independent panel of experts as 
        determined under this section.
            (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of 
        the economic and environmental assumptions and 
        projections, project evaluation data, economic 
        analyses, environmental analyses, engineering analyses, 
        formulation of alternative plans, methods for 
        integrating risk and uncertainty, models used in 
        evaluation of economic or environmental impacts of 
        proposed projects, and any biological opinions of the 
        project study.
            (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
                    (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be 
                subject to peer review under paragraph (1) if--
                            (i) the project has an estimated 
                        total cost of more than $45,000,000, 
                        including mitigation costs, and is not 
                        determined by the Chief of Engineers to 
                        be exempt from peer review under 
                        paragraph (6);
                            (ii) the Governor of an affected 
                        State requests a peer review by an 
                        independent panel of experts; or
                            (iii) the Chief of Engineers 
                        determines that the project study is 
                        controversial considering the factors 
                        set forth in paragraph (4).
                    (B) Discretionary.--
                            (i) Agency request.--A project 
                        study shall be considered by the Chief 
                        of Engineers for peer review under this 
                        section if the head of a Federal or 
                        State agency charged with reviewing the 
                        project study determines that the 
                        project is likely to have a significant 
                        adverse impact on environmental, 
                        cultural, or other resources under the 
                        jurisdiction of the agency after 
                        implementation of proposed mitigation 
                        plans and requests a peer review by an 
                        independent panel of experts.
                            (ii) Deadline for decision.--A 
                        decision of the Chief of Engineers 
                        under this subparagraph whether to 
                        conduct a peer review shall be made 
                        within 21 days of the date of receipt 
                        of the request by the head of the 
                        Federal or State agency under clause 
                        (i).
                            (iii) Reasons for not conducting 
                        peer review.--If the Chief of Engineers 
                        decides not to conduct a peer review 
                        following a request under clause (i), 
                        the Chief shall make publicly 
                        available, including on the Internet, 
                        the reasons for not conducting the peer 
                        review.
                            (iv) Appeal to chairman of council 
                        on environmental quality.--A decision 
                        by the Chief of Engineers not to 
                        conduct a peer review following a 
                        request under clause (i) shall be 
                        subject to appeal by a person referred 
                        to in clause (i) to the Chairman of the 
                        Council on Environmental Quality if 
                        such appeal is made within the 30-day 
                        period following the date of the 
                        decision being made available under 
                        clause (iii). A decision of the 
                        Chairman on an appeal under this clause 
                        shall be made within 30 days of the 
                        date of the appeal.
            (4) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a 
        project study is controversial under paragraph 
        (3)(A)(iii), the Chief of Engineers shall consider if--
                    (A) there is a significant public dispute 
                as to the size, nature, or effects of the 
                project; or
                    (B) there is a significant public dispute 
                as to the economic or environmental costs or 
                benefits of the project.
            (5) Project studies excluded from peer review.--The 
        Chief of Engineers may exclude a project study from 
        peer review under paragraph (1)--
                    (A) if the project study does not include 
                an environmental impact statement and is a 
                project study subject to peer review under 
                paragraph (3)(A)(i) that the Chief of Engineers 
                determines--
                            (i) is not controversial;
                            (ii) has no more than negligible 
                        adverse impacts on scarce or unique 
                        cultural, historic, or tribal 
                        resources;
                            (iii) has no substantial adverse 
                        impacts on fish and wildlife species 
                        and their habitat prior to the 
                        implementation of mitigation measures; 
                        and
                            (iv) has, before implementation of 
                        mitigation measures, no more than a 
                        negligible adverse impact on a species 
                        listed as endangered or threatened 
                        species under the Endangered Species 
                        Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) or 
                        the critical habitat of such species 
                        designated under such Act;
                    (B) if the project study--
                            (i) involves only the 
                        rehabilitation or replacement of 
                        existing hydropower turbines, lock 
                        structures, or flood control gates 
                        within the same footprint and for the 
                        same purpose as an existing water 
                        resources project;
                            (ii) is for an activity for which 
                        there is ample experience within the 
                        Corps of Engineers and industry to 
                        treat the activity as being routine; 
                        and
                            (iii) has minimal life safety risk; 
                        or
                    (C) if the project study does not include 
                an environmental impact statement and is a 
                project study pursued under section 205 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), 
                section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 
                28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
                section 107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 
                1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), section 3 of the Act 
                entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
                participation in the cost of protecting the 
                shores of publicly owned property'', approved 
                August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), section 111 
                of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 
                426i), section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
                authorizing the construction, repair, and 
                preservation of certain public works on rivers 
                and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
                March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), section 1135 of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2309a), or section 206 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
                2330).
            (6) Determination of total cost.--For purposes of 
        determining the estimated total cost of a project under 
        paragraph (3)(A), the total cost shall be based upon 
        the reasonable estimates of the Chief of Engineers at 
        the completion of the reconnaissance study for the 
        project. If the reasonable estimate of total costs is 
        subsequently determined to be in excess of the amount 
        in paragraph (3)(A), the Chief of Engineers shall make 
        a determination whether a project study is required to 
        be reviewed under this section.
    (b) Timing of Peer Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Chief of Engineers shall 
        determine the timing of a peer review of a project 
        study under subsection (a). In all cases, the peer 
        review shall occur during the period beginning on the 
        date of the signing of the feasibility cost-sharing 
        agreement for the study and ending on the date 
        established under subsection (e)(1)(A) for the peer 
        review and shall be accomplished concurrent with the 
        conducting of the project study.
            (2) Factors to consider.--In any case in which the 
        Chief of Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a 
        project study, the Chief of Engineers shall consider, 
        at a minimum, whether to initiate a peer review at the 
        time that--
                    (A) the without-project conditions are 
                identified;
                    (B) the array of alternatives to be 
                considered are identified; and
                    (C) the preferred alternative is 
                identified.
            (3) Limitation on multiple peer review.--Nothing in 
        this subsection shall be construed to require the Chief 
        of Engineers to conduct multiple peer reviews for a 
        project study.
    (c) Establishment of Panels.--
            (1) In general.--For each project study subject to 
        peer review under subsection (a), as soon as 
        practicable after the Chief of Engineers determines 
        that a project study will be subject to peer review, 
        the Chief of Engineers shall contract with the National 
        Academy of Sciences or a similar independent scientific 
        and technical advisory organization or an eligible 
        organization to establish a panel of experts to conduct 
        a peer review for the project study.
            (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for 
        a project study under this section shall be composed of 
        independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
        expertise suitable for the review being conducted.
            (3) Limitation on appointments.--The National 
        Academy of Sciences or any other organization the Chief 
        of Engineers contracts with under paragraph (1) to 
        establish a panel of experts shall apply the National 
        Academy of Science's policy for selecting committee 
        members to ensure that members selected for the panel 
        of experts have no conflict with the project being 
        reviewed.
            (4) Congressional notification.--Upon 
        identification of a project study for peer review under 
        this section, but prior to initiation of the review, 
        the Chief of Engineers shall notify the Committee on 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives of the review.
    (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a 
peer review for a project study under this section shall--
            (1) conduct the peer review for the project study;
            (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the 
        economic, engineering, and environmental methods, 
        models, and analyses used by the Chief of Engineers;
            (3) receive from the Chief of Engineers the public 
        written and oral comments provided to the Chief of 
        Engineers;
            (4) provide timely written and oral comments to the 
        Chief of Engineers throughout the development of the 
        project study, as requested; and
            (5) submit to the Chief of Engineers a final report 
        containing the panel's economic, engineering, and 
        environmental analysis of the project study, including 
        the panel's assessment of the adequacy and 
        acceptability of the economic, engineering, and 
        environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the 
        Chief of Engineers, to accompany the publication of the 
        report of the Chief of Engineers for the project.
    (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
            (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts established under 
        this section shall--
                    (A) complete its peer review under this 
                section for a project study and submit a report 
                to the Chief of Engineers under subsection 
                (d)(5) not more than 60 days after the last day 
                of the public comment period for the draft 
                project study, or, if the Chief of Engineers 
                determines that a longer period of time is 
                necessary, such period of time determined 
                necessary by the Chief of Engineers; and
                    (B) terminate on the date of initiation of 
                the State and agency review required by the 
                first section of the Flood Control Act of 
                December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887).
            (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel of 
        experts does not complete its peer review of a project 
        study under this section and submit a report to the 
        Chief of Engineers under subsection (d)(5) on or before 
        the deadline established by paragraph (1) for the peer 
        review, the Chief of Engineers shall complete the 
        project study without delay.
    (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
            (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of 
        experts under this section and before entering a final 
        record of decision for the project, the Chief of 
        Engineers shall consider any recommendations contained 
        in the report and prepare a written response for any 
        recommendations adopted or not adopted.
            (2) Public availability and transmittal to 
        congress.--After receiving a report on a project study 
        from a panel of experts under this section, the Chief 
        of Engineers shall--
                    (A) make a copy of the report and any 
                written response of the Chief of Engineers on 
                recommendations contained in the report 
                available to the public by electronic means, 
                including the Internet; and
                    (B) transmit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                a copy of the report, together with any such 
                written response, on the date of a final report 
                of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
                decision document for the project study.
    (g) Costs.--
            (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts 
        established for a peer review under this section--
                    (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
                    (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
            (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the 
        $500,000 limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in 
        cases that the Chief of Engineers determines 
        appropriate.
    (h) Applicability.--This section shall apply to--
            (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year 
        period preceding the date of enactment of this Act and 
        for which the array of alternatives to be considered 
        has not been identified; and
            (2) project studies initiated during the period 
        beginning on such date of enactment and ending 7 years 
        after such date of enactment.
    (i) Reports.--
            (1) Initial report.--Not later than 3 years after 
        the date of enactment of this section, the Chief of 
        Engineers shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report on the implementation of this 
        section.
            (2) Additional report.--Not later than 6 years 
        after the date of enactment of this section, the Chief 
        of Engineers shall update the report under paragraph 
        (1) taking into account any further information on 
        implementation of this section and submit such updated 
        report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a peer review 
panel established under this section.
    (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers to 
cause or conduct a peer review of a water resources project 
existing on the date of enactment of this section.
    (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
definitions apply:
            (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' 
        means--
                    (A) a feasibility study or reevaluation 
                study for a water resources project, including 
                the environmental impact statement prepared for 
                the study; and
                    (B) any other study associated with a 
                modification of a water resources project that 
                includes an environmental impact statement, 
                including the environmental impact statement 
                prepared for the study.
            (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', 
        as used with respect to a water resources project, 
        means a State all or a portion of which is within the 
        drainage basin in which the project is or would be 
        located and would be economically or environmentally 
        affected as a consequence of the project.
            (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible 
        organization'' means an organization that--
                    (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and 
                exempt from Federal tax under section 501(a), 
                of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
                    (B) is independent;
                    (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
                    (D) does not carry out or advocate for or 
                against Federal water resources projects; and
                    (E) has experience in establishing and 
                administering peer review panels.
            (4) Total cost.--The term ``total cost'', as used 
        with respect to a water resources project, means the 
        cost of construction (including planning and designing) 
        of the project. In the case of a project for hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction or flood damage reduction 
        that includes periodic nourishment over the life of the 
        project, the term includes the total cost of the 
        nourishment.

SEC. 2035. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW.

    (a) Projects Subject to Safety Assurance Review.--The Chief 
of Engineers shall ensure that the design and construction 
activities for hurricane and storm damage reduction and flood 
damage reduction projects are reviewed by independent experts 
under this section if the Chief of Engineers determines that a 
review by independent experts is necessary to assure public 
health, safety, and welfare.
    (b) Factors.--In determining whether a review of design and 
construction of a project is necessary under this section, the 
Chief of Engineers shall consider whether--
            (1) the failure of the project would pose a 
        significant threat to human life;
            (2) the project involves the use of innovative 
        materials or techniques;
            (3) the project design lacks redundancy; or
            (4) the project has a unique construction 
        sequencing or a reduced or overlapping design 
        construction schedule.
    (c) Safety Assurance Review.--
            (1) Initiation of review.--At the appropriate point 
        in the development of detailed engineering and design 
        specifications for each water resources project subject 
        to review under this section, the Chief of Engineers 
        shall initiate a safety assurance review by independent 
        experts on the design and construction activities for 
        the project.
            (2) Selection of reviewers.--A safety assurance 
        review under this section shall include participation 
        by experts selected by the Chief of Engineers from 
        among individuals who are distinguished experts in 
        engineering, hydrology, or other appropriate 
        disciplines. The Chief of Engineers shall apply the 
        National Academy of Science's policy for selecting 
        reviewers to ensure that reviewers have no conflict of 
        interest with the project being reviewed.
            (3) Compensation.--An individual serving as an 
        independent reviewer under this section shall be 
        compensated at a rate of pay to be determined by the 
        Secretary and shall be allowed travel expenses.
    (d) Scope of Safety Assurance Reviews.--A safety assurance 
review under this section shall include a review of the design 
and construction activities prior to the initiation of physical 
construction and periodically thereafter until construction 
activities are completed on a regular schedule sufficient to 
inform the Chief of Engineers on the adequacy, appropriateness, 
and acceptability of the design and construction activities for 
the purpose of assuring public health, safety, and welfare. The 
Chief of Engineers shall ensure that reviews under this section 
do not create any unnecessary delays in design and construction 
activities.
    (e) Safety Assurance Review Record.--The written 
recommendations of a reviewer or panel of reviewers under this 
section and the responses of the Chief of Engineers shall be 
available to the public, including through electronic means on 
the Internet.
    (f) Applicability.--This section shall apply to any project 
in design or under construction on the date of enactment of 
this Act and to any project with respect to which design or 
construction is initiated during the period beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act and ending 7 years after such 
date of enactment.

SEC. 2036. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE AND WETLANDS LOSSES.

    (a) Mitigation for Fish and Wildlife Losses.--Section 
906(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1) by 
        striking ``to the Congress'' and inserting ``to 
        Congress in any report, and shall not select a project 
        alternative in any report,'';
            (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) by 
        inserting ``, and other habitat types are mitigated to 
        not less than in-kind conditions'' after ``mitigated 
        in-kind''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Mitigation requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--To mitigate losses to 
                flood damage reduction capabilities and fish 
                and wildlife resulting from a water resources 
                project, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
                mitigation plan for each water resources 
                project complies with the mitigation standards 
                and policies established pursuant to the 
                regulatory programs administered by the 
                Secretary.
                    ``(B) Inclusions.--A specific mitigation 
                plan for a water resources project under 
                paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum--
                            ``(i) a plan for monitoring the 
                        implementation and ecological success 
                        of each mitigation measure, including 
                        the cost and duration of any 
                        monitoring, and, to the extent 
                        practicable, a designation of the 
                        entities that will be responsible for 
                        the monitoring;
                            ``(ii) the criteria for ecological 
                        success by which the mitigation will be 
                        evaluated and determined to be 
                        successful based on replacement of lost 
                        functions and values of the habitat, 
                        including hydrologic and vegetative 
                        characteristics;
                            ``(iii) a description of the land 
                        and interests in land to be acquired 
                        for the mitigation plan and the basis 
                        for a determination that the land and 
                        interests are available for 
                        acquisition;
                            ``(iv) a description of--
                                    ``(I) the types and amount 
                                of restoration activities to be 
                                conducted;
                                    ``(II) the physical action 
                                to be undertaken to achieve the 
                                mitigation objectives within 
                                the watershed in which such 
                                losses occur and, in any case 
                                in which the mitigation will 
                                occur outside the watershed, a 
                                detailed explanation for 
                                undertaking the mitigation 
                                outside the watershed; and
                                    ``(III) the functions and 
                                values that will result from 
                                the mitigation plan; and
                            ``(v) a contingency plan for taking 
                        corrective actions in cases in which 
                        monitoring demonstrates that mitigation 
                        measures are not achieving ecological 
                        success in accordance with criteria 
                        under clause (ii).
                    ``(C) Responsibility for monitoring.--In 
                any case in which it is not practicable to 
                identify in a mitigation plan for a water 
                resources project the entity responsible for 
                monitoring at the time of a final report of the 
                Chief of Engineers or other final decision 
                document for the project, such entity shall be 
                identified in the partnership agreement entered 
                into with the non-Federal interest under 
                section 221 of Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
                U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
            ``(4) Determination of success.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A mitigation plan under 
                this subsection shall be considered to be 
                successful at the time at which the criteria 
                under paragraph (3)(B)(ii) are achieved under 
                the plan, as determined by monitoring under 
                paragraph (3)(B)(i).
                    ``(B) Consultation.--In determining whether 
                a mitigation plan is successful under 
                subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consult 
                annually with appropriate Federal agencies and 
                each State in which the applicable project is 
                located on at least the following:
                            ``(i) The ecological success of the 
                        mitigation as of the date on which the 
                        report is submitted.
                            ``(ii) The likelihood that the 
                        mitigation will achieve ecological 
                        success, as defined in the mitigation 
                        plan.
                            ``(iii) The projected timeline for 
                        achieving that success.
                            ``(iv) Any recommendations for 
                        improving the likelihood of success.
            ``(5) Monitoring.--Mitigation monitoring shall 
        continue until it has been demonstrated that the 
        mitigation has met the ecological success criteria.''.
    (b) Status Report.--
            (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's 
        submission to Congress of the President's request for 
        appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a fiscal 
        year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of 
        construction of projects that require mitigation under 
        section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the status of such mitigation, 
        and the results of the consultation under subsection 
        (d)(4)(B) of such section.
            (2) Projects included.--The status report shall 
        include the status of--
                    (A) all projects that are under 
                construction as of the date of the report;
                    (B) all projects for which the President 
                requests funding for the next fiscal year; and
                    (C) all projects that have undergone or 
                completed construction, but have not completed 
                the mitigation required under section 906 of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.
            (3) Availability of information.--The Secretary 
        shall make information contained in the status report 
        available to the public, including on the Internet.
    (c) Wetlands Mitigation.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out a water resources 
        project that involves wetlands mitigation and that has 
        impacts that occur within the service area of a 
        mitigation bank, the Secretary, where appropriate, 
        shall first consider the use of the mitigation bank if 
        the bank contains sufficient available credits to 
        offset the impact and the bank is approved in 
        accordance with the Federal Guidance for the 
        Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks 
        (60 Fed. Reg. 58605) or other applicable Federal law 
        (including regulations).
            (2) Service area.--To the maximum extent 
        practicable, the service area of the mitigation bank 
        under paragraph (1) shall be in the same watershed as 
        the affected habitat.
            (3) Responsibility for monitoring.--
                    (A) In general.--Purchase of credits from a 
                mitigation bank for a water resources project 
                relieves the Secretary and the non-Federal 
                interest from responsibility for monitoring or 
                demonstrating mitigation success.
                    (B) Applicability.--The relief of 
                responsibility under subparagraph (A) applies 
                only in any case in which the Secretary 
                determines that monitoring of mitigation 
                success is being conducted by the Secretary or 
                by the owner or operator of the mitigation 
                bank.

SEC. 2037. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended to read as 
follows:

``SEC. 204. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    ``(a) In General.--
            ``(1) Sediment use.--For sediment obtained through 
        the construction, operation, or maintenance of an 
        authorized Federal water resources project, the 
        Secretary shall develop, at Federal expense, regional 
        sediment management plans and carry out projects at 
        locations identified in plans developed under this 
        section, or identified jointly by the non-Federal 
        interest and the Secretary, for use in the 
        construction, repair, modification, or rehabilitation 
        of projects associated with Federal water resources 
        projects for purposes listed in paragraph (3).
            ``(2) Cooperation.--The Secretary shall develop 
        plans under this subsection in cooperation with the 
        appropriate Federal, State, regional, and local 
        agencies.
            ``(3) Purposes for sediment use in projects.--The 
        purposes of using sediment for the construction, 
        repair, modification, or rehabilitation of Federal 
        water resources projects are--
                    ``(A) to reduce storm damage to property;
                    ``(B) to protect, restore, and create 
                aquatic and ecologically related habitats, 
                including wetlands; and
                    ``(C) to transport and place suitable 
                sediment.
    ``(b) Secretarial Findings.--Subject to subsection (c), 
projects carried out under subsection (a) may be carried out in 
any case in which the Secretary finds that--
            ``(1) the environmental, economic, and social 
        benefits of the project, both monetary and nonmonetary, 
        justify the cost of the project; and
            ``(2) the project will not result in environmental 
        degradation.
    ``(c) Determination of Project Costs.--
            ``(1) Costs of construction.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Costs associated with 
                construction of a project under this section or 
                identified in a regional sediment management 
                plan shall be limited solely to construction 
                costs that are in excess of the costs necessary 
                to carry out the dredging for construction, 
                operation, or maintenance of an authorized 
                Federal water resources project in the most 
                cost-effective way, consistent with economic, 
                engineering, and environmental criteria.
                    ``(B) Cost sharing.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Except as 
                        provided in clause (ii), the non-
                        Federal share of the construction cost 
                        of a project under this section shall 
                        be determined as provided in 
                        subsections (a) through (d) of section 
                        103 of the Water Resources Development 
                        Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
                            ``(ii) Special rule.--Construction 
                        of a project under this section for one 
                        or more of the purposes of protection, 
                        restoration, or creation of aquatic and 
                        ecologically related habitat, the cost 
                        of which does not exceed $750,000 and 
                        which is located in a disadvantaged 
                        community as determined by the 
                        Secretary, may be carried out at 
                        Federal expense.
                    ``(C) Total cost.--The total Federal costs 
                associated with construction of a project under 
                this section may not exceed $5,000,000.
            ``(2) Operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation costs.--Operation, maintenance, 
        replacement, and rehabilitation costs associated with a 
        project under this section are the responsibility of 
        the non-Federal interest.
    ``(d) Selection of Dredged Material Disposal Method for 
Environmental Purposes.--
            ``(1) In general.--In developing and carrying out a 
        Federal water resources project involving the disposal 
        of dredged material, the Secretary may select, with the 
        consent of the non-Federal interest, a disposal method 
        that is not the least cost option if the Secretary 
        determines that the incremental costs of the disposal 
        method are reasonable in relation to the environmental 
        benefits, including the benefits to the aquatic 
        environment to be derived from the creation of wetlands 
        and control of shoreline erosion.
            ``(2) Federal share.--The Federal share of such 
        incremental costs shall be determined in accordance 
        with subsection (c).
    ``(e) State and Regional Plans.--The Secretary may--
            ``(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation 
        of a comprehensive State or regional sediment 
        management plan within the boundaries of the State;
            ``(2) encourage State participation in the 
        implementation of the plan; and
            ``(3) submit to Congress reports and 
        recommendations with respect to appropriate Federal 
        participation in carrying out the plan.
    ``(f) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to a regional sediment management 
project in the vicinity of each of the following:
            ``(1) Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas.
            ``(2) Fletcher Cove, California.
            ``(3) Egmont Key, Florida.
            ``(4) Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
            ``(5) Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(6) Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York.
            ``(7) Smith Point Park Pavilion and the TWA Flight 
        800 Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.
            ``(8) Morehead City, North Carolina.
            ``(9) Toledo Harbor, Lucas County, Ohio.
            ``(10) Galveston Bay, Texas.
            ``(11) Benson Beach, Washington.
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 per 
fiscal year, of which not more than $5,000,000 per fiscal year 
may be used for the development of regional sediment management 
plans authorized by subsection (e) and of which not more than 
$3,000,000 per fiscal year may be used for construction of 
projects to which subsection (c)(1)(B)(ii) applies. Such funds 
shall remain available until expended.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
            (2) Existing projects.--The Secretary may complete 
        any project being carried out under section 145 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1976 on the day 
        before the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2038. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the 
shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 
(33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 3. STORM AND HURRICANE RESTORATION AND IMPACT MINIMIZATION 
                    PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Construction of Small Shore and Beach Restoration and 
Protection Projects.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a 
        program for the construction of small shore and beach 
        restoration and protection projects not specifically 
        authorized by Congress that otherwise comply with the 
        first section of this Act if the Secretary determines 
        that such construction is advisable.
            ``(2) Local cooperation.--The local cooperation 
        requirement of the first section of this Act shall 
        apply to a project under this section.
            ``(3) Completeness.--A project under this 
        subsection--
                    ``(A) shall be complete; and
                    ``(B) shall not commit the United States to 
                any additional improvement to ensure the 
                successful operation of the project; except for 
                participation in periodic beach nourishment in 
                accordance with--
                            ``(i) the first section of this 
                        Act; and
                            ``(ii) the procedure for projects 
                        authorized after submission of a survey 
                        report.
    ``(b) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
Demonstration Program.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct 
        under the program authorized by subsection (a) a 
        national shoreline erosion control development and 
        demonstration program (referred to in this section as 
        the `demonstration program').
            ``(2) Requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The demonstration 
                program shall include provisions for--
                            ``(i) projects consisting of 
                        planning, design, construction, and 
                        monitoring of prototype engineered and 
                        native and naturalized vegetative 
                        shoreline erosion control devices and 
                        methods;
                            ``(ii) monitoring of the applicable 
                        prototypes;
                            ``(iii) detailed engineering and 
                        environmental reports on the results of 
                        each project carried out under the 
                        demonstraton program; and
                            ``(iv) technology transfers, as 
                        appropriate, to private property 
                        owners, State and local entities, 
                        nonprofit educational institutions, and 
                        nongovernmental organizations.
                    ``(B) Determination of feasibility.--A 
                project under the demonstration program shall 
                not be carried out until the Secretary 
                determines that the project is feasible.
                    ``(C) Emphasis.--A project under the 
                demonstration program shall emphasize, to the 
                maximum extent practicable--
                            ``(i) the development and 
                        demonstration of innovative 
                        technologies;
                            ``(ii) efficient designs to prevent 
                        erosion at a shoreline site, taking 
                        into account the lifecycle cost of the 
                        design, including cleanup, maintenance, 
                        and amortization;
                            ``(iii) new and enhanced shore 
                        protection project design and project 
                        formulation tools the purposes of which 
                        are to improve the physical 
                        performance, and lower the lifecycle 
                        costs, of the projects;
                            ``(iv) natural designs, including 
                        the use of native and naturalized 
                        vegetation or temporary structures that 
                        minimize permanent structural 
                        alterations to the shoreline;
                            ``(v) the avoidance of negative 
                        impacts to adjacent shorefront 
                        communities;
                            ``(vi) in areas with substantial 
                        residential or commercial interests 
                        located adjacent to the shoreline, 
                        designs that do not impair the 
                        aesthetic appeal of the interests;
                            ``(vii) the potential for long-term 
                        protection afforded by the technology; 
                        and
                            ``(viii) recommendations developed 
                        from evaluations of the program 
                        established under the Shoreline Erosion 
                        Control Demonstration Act of 1974 (42 
                        U.S.C. 1962-5 note), including--
                                    ``(I) adequate 
                                consideration of the subgrade;
                                    ``(II) proper filtration;
                                    ``(III) durable components;
                                    ``(IV) adequate connection 
                                between units; and
                                    ``(V) consideration of 
                                additional relevant 
                                information.
                    ``(D) Sites.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Each project 
                        under the demonstration program may be 
                        carried out at--
                                    ``(I) a privately owned 
                                site with substantial public 
                                access; or
                                    ``(II) a publicly owned 
                                site on open coast or in tidal 
                                waters.
                            ``(ii) Selection.--The Secretary 
                        shall develop criteria for the 
                        selection of sites for projects under 
                        the demonstration program, including 
                        criteria based on--
                                    ``(I) a variety of 
                                geographic and climatic 
                                conditions;
                                    ``(II) the size of the 
                                population that is dependent on 
                                the beaches for recreation or 
                                the protection of private 
                                property or public 
                                infrastructure;
                                    ``(III) the rate of 
                                erosion;
                                    ``(IV) significant natural 
                                resources or habitats and 
                                environmentally sensitive 
                                areas; and
                                    ``(V) significant 
                                threatened historic structures 
                                or landmarks.
            ``(3) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out 
        the demonstration program in consultation with--
                    ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, 
                particularly with respect to native and 
                naturalized vegetative means of preventing and 
                controlling shoreline erosion;
                    ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
                    ``(C) private organizations;
                    ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research 
                Center established by the first section of 
                Public Law 88-172 (33 U.S.C. 426-1); and
                    ``(E) applicable university research 
                facilities.
            ``(4) Completion of demonstration.--After carrying 
        out the initial construction and evaluation of the 
        performance and cost of a project under the 
        demonstration program, the Secretary may--
                    ``(A) amend, at the request of a non-
                Federal interest of the project, the 
                partnership agreement for a federally 
                authorized shore protection project in 
                existence on the date on which initial 
                construction of the project under the 
                demonstration program is complete to 
                incorporate the project constructed under the 
                demonstration program as a feature of the shore 
                protection project, with the future cost 
                sharing of the project constructed under the 
                demonstration program to be determined by the 
                project purposes of the shore protection 
                project; or
                    ``(B) transfer all interest in and 
                responsibility for the completed project 
                constructed under the demonstration program to 
                a non-Federal interest or another Federal 
                agency.
            ``(5) Agreements.--The Secretary may enter into a 
        partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest or 
        a cooperative agreement with the head of another 
        Federal agency under the demonstration program--
                    ``(A) to share the costs of construction, 
                operation, maintenance, and monitoring of a 
                project under the demonstration program;
                    ``(B) to share the costs of removing the 
                project, or element of the project if the 
                Secretary determines that the project or 
                element of the project is detrimental to public 
                or private property, public infrastructure, or 
                public safety; or
                    ``(C) to specify ownership of the completed 
                project if the Secretary determines that the 
                completed project will not be part of a Corps 
                of Engineers project.
            ``(6) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, 
        and every 3 years thereafter, the Secretary shall 
        prepare and submit to the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing--
                    ``(A) the activities carried out and 
                accomplishments made under the demonstration 
                program since the previous report under this 
                paragraph; and
                    ``(B) any recommendations of the Secretary 
                relating to the program.
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary may expend, from any appropriations made 
        available to the Secretary for the purpose of carrying 
        out civil works, not more than $30,000,000 during any 
        fiscal year to pay the Federal share of the costs of 
        construction of small shore and beach restoration and 
        protection projects or small projects under this 
        section.
            ``(2) Limitation.--The total amount expended for a 
        project under this section shall--
                    ``(A) be sufficient to pay the cost of 
                Federal participation in the project (including 
                periodic nourishment as provided for under the 
                first section of this Act), as determined by 
                the Secretary; and
                    ``(B) be not more than $5,000,000.''.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 5 the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the 
shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 
(33 U.S.C. 426h), is repealed.

SEC. 2039. MONITORING ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a feasibility study for a 
project (or a component of a project) for ecosystem 
restoration, the Secretary shall ensure that the recommended 
project includes, as an integral part of the project, a plan 
for monitoring the success of the ecosystem restoration.
    (b) Monitoring Plan.--The monitoring plan shall--
            (1) include a description of the monitoring 
        activities to be carried out, the criteria for 
        ecosystem restoration success, and the estimated cost 
        and duration of the monitoring; and
            (2) specify that the monitoring shall continue 
        until such time as the Secretary determines that the 
        criteria for ecosystem restoration success will be met.
    (c) Cost Share.--For a period of 10 years from completion 
of construction of a project (or a component of a project) for 
ecosystem restoration, the Secretary shall consider the cost of 
carrying out the monitoring as a project cost. If the 
monitoring plan under subsection (b) requires monitoring beyond 
the 10-year period, the cost of monitoring shall be a non-
Federal responsibility.

SEC. 2040. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a program 
to allow electronic submission of permit applications for 
permits under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--This section does not preclude the 
submission of a physical copy.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 2041. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Project Tracking.--The Secretary shall assign a unique 
tracking number to each water resources project under the 
jurisdiction of the Secretary to be used by each Federal agency 
throughout the life of the project.
    (b) Report Repository.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the 
        Library of Congress a copy of each final feasibility 
        study, final environmental impact statement, final 
        reevaluation report, record of decision, and report to 
        Congress prepared by the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Availability to public.--Each document 
        described in paragraph (1) shall be made available to 
        the public, and an electronic copy of each document 
        shall be made permanently available to the public 
        through the Internet.

SEC. 2042. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.

    Sections 101, 106, and 108 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 
Stat. 2252-2254), are repealed.

SEC. 2043. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) Studies.--
            (1) Cost-sharing requirements.--Section 105(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2215(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Detailed project reports.--The requirements 
        of this subsection that apply to a feasibility study 
        also shall apply to a study that results in a detailed 
        project report, except that--
                    ``(A) the first $100,000 of the costs of a 
                study that results in a detailed project report 
                shall be a Federal expense; and
                    ``(B) paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall not apply 
                to such a study.''.
            (2) Planning and engineering.--Section 105(b) of 
        such Act (33 U.S.C. 2215(b)) is amended by striking 
        ``authorized by this Act''.
            (3) Definitions.--Section 105 of such Act (33 
        U.S.C. 2215) is amended by adding at the end the 
        following:
    ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
definitions apply:
            ``(1) Detailed project report.--The term `detailed 
        project report' means a report for a project not 
        specifically authorized by Congress in law or otherwise 
        that determines the feasibility of the project with a 
        level of detail appropriate to the scope and complexity 
        of the recommended solution and sufficient to proceed 
        directly to the preparation of contract plans and 
        specifications. The term includes any associated 
        environmental impact statement and mitigation plan. For 
        a project for which the Federal cost does not exceed 
        $1,000,000, the term includes a planning and design 
        analysis document.
            ``(2) Feasibility study.--The term `feasibility 
        study' means a study that results in a feasibility 
        report under section 905, and any associated 
        environmental impact statement and mitigation plan, 
        prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water 
        resources project. The term includes a study that 
        results in a project implementation report prepared 
        under title VI of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation 
        report, and a limited reevaluation report.''.
    (b) Reports.--
            (1) Preparation.--Section 905(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)) 
        is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``(a) In the case of any'' 
                and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Preparation of Reports.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any'';
                    (B) by striking ``the Secretary, the 
                Secretary shall'' and inserting ``the Secretary 
                that results in recommendations concerning a 
                project or the operation of a project and that 
                requires specific authorization by Congress in 
                law or otherwise, the Secretary shall perform a 
                reconnaissance study and'';
                    (C) by striking ``Such feasibility report'' 
                and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Contents of feasibility reports.--A 
        feasibility report'';
                    (D) by striking ``The feasibility report'' 
                and inserting ``A feasibility report''; and
                    (E) by striking the last sentence and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not 
        apply to--
                    ``(A) any study with respect to which a 
                report has been submitted to Congress before 
                the date of enactment of this Act;
                    ``(B) any study for a project, which 
                project is authorized for construction by this 
                Act and is not subject to section 903(b);
                    ``(C) any study for a project which does 
                not require specific authorization by Congress 
                in law or otherwise; and
                    ``(D) general studies not intended to lead 
                to recommendation of a specific water resources 
                project.
            ``(4) Feasibility report defined.--In this 
        subsection, the term `feasibility report' means each 
        feasibility report, and any associated environmental 
        impact statement and mitigation plan, prepared by the 
        Corps of Engineers for a water resources project. The 
        term includes a project implementation report prepared 
        under title VI of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation 
        report, and a limited reevaluation report.''.
            (2) Projects not specifically authorized by 
        congress.--Section 905 of such Act is further amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b) by inserting 
                ``Reconnaissance Studies.--'' before ``Before 
                initiating'';
                    (B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), 
                and (e) as subsections (d), (e), and (f), 
                respectively;
                    (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the 
                following:
    ``(c) Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress.--In 
the case of any water resources project-related study 
authorized to be undertaken by the Secretary without specific 
authorization by Congress in law or otherwise, the Secretary 
shall prepare a detailed project report.'';
                    (D) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) 
                by inserting ``Indian Tribes.--'' before ``For 
                purposes of''; and
                    (E) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated) 
                by inserting 
                ``StandardandUniformProceduresandPractices.--'' 
                before ``The Secretary shall''.

SEC. 2044. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
                    ACTIONS.

    (a) Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the non-Federal 
interest in the form of a written notice of intent to construct 
or modify a non-Federal water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure, flood damage reduction, storm damage reduction, 
ecosystem restoration, or navigation project that requires the 
approval of the Secretary, the Secretary shall initiate, 
subject to subsection (c), procedures to establish a schedule 
for consolidating Federal, State, and local agency and Indian 
tribe environmental assessments, project reviews, and issuance 
of all permits for the construction or modification of the 
project. All States and Indian tribes having jurisdiction over 
the proposed project shall be invited by the Secretary, but 
shall not be required, to participate in carrying out this 
section with respect to the project.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary shall seek, to the extent 
practicable, to consolidate hearing and comment periods, 
procedures for data collection and report preparation, and the 
environmental review and permitting processes associated with 
the project and related activities. The Secretary shall notify, 
to the extent possible, the non-Federal interest of its 
responsibilities for data development and information that may 
be necessary to process each permit required for the project, 
including a schedule when the information and data should be 
provided to the appropriate Federal, State, or local agency or 
Indian tribe.
    (c) Costs of Coordination.--The costs incurred by the 
Secretary to establish and carry out a schedule to consolidate 
Federal, State, and local agency and Indian tribe environmental 
assessments, project reviews, and permit issuance for a project 
under this section shall be paid by the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years 
after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary 
shall prepare and transmit to Congress a report estimating the 
time required for the issuance of all Federal, State, local, 
and tribal permits for the construction of non-Federal projects 
for water supply, wastewater infrastructure, flood damage 
reduction, storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and 
navigation.

SEC. 2045. PROJECT STREAMLINING.

    (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are 
important to the Nation's economy and environment, and 
recommendations to Congress regarding such projects should not 
be delayed due to uncoordinated or inefficient reviews or the 
failure to timely resolve disputes during the development of 
water resources projects.
    (b) Scope.--This section shall apply to each study 
initiated after the date of enactment of this Act to develop a 
feasibility report under section 905 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), or a reevaluation 
report, for a water resources project if the Secretary 
determines that such study requires an environmental impact 
statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary 
shall develop and implement a coordinated review process for 
the development of water resources projects.
    (d) Coordinated Reviews.--The coordinated review process 
under this section may provide that all reviews, analyses, 
opinions, permits, licenses, and approvals that must be issued 
or made by a Federal, State, or local government agency or 
Indian tribe for the development of a water resources project 
described in subsection (b) will be conducted, to the maximum 
extent practicable, concurrently and completed within a time 
period established by the Secretary in cooperation with the 
agencies identified under subsection (e) with respect to the 
project.
    (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With 
respect to the development of each water resources project, the 
Secretary shall identify, as soon as practicable, all Federal, 
State, and local government agencies and Indian tribes that 
may--
            (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
            (2) be required by law to conduct or issue a 
        review, analysis, or opinion for the project; or
            (3) be required to make a determination on issuing 
        a permit, license, or approval for the project.
    (f) State Authority.--If the coordinated review process is 
being implemented under this section by the Secretary with 
respect to the development of a water resources project 
described in subsection (b) within the boundaries of a State, 
the State, consistent with State law, may choose to participate 
in the process and to make subject to the process all State 
agencies that--
            (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
            (2) are required to conduct or issue a review, 
        analysis, or opinion for the project; or
            (3) are required to make a determination on issuing 
        a permit, license, or approval for the project.
    (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review 
process developed under this section may be incorporated into a 
memorandum of understanding for a water resources project 
between the Secretary, the heads of Federal, State, and local 
government agencies, Indian tribes identified under subsection 
(e), and the non-Federal interest for the project.
    (h) Effect of Failure to Meet Deadline.--
            (1) Notification.--If the Secretary determines that 
        a Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian 
        tribe, or non-Federal interest that is participating in 
        the coordinated review process under this section with 
        respect to the development of a water resources project 
        has not met a deadline established under subsection (d) 
        for the project, the Secretary shall notify, within 30 
        days of the date of such determination, the agency, 
        Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest about the failure 
        to meet the deadline.
            (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after 
        the date of receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), 
        the Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian 
        tribe, or non-Federal interest involved may submit a 
        report to the Secretary, explaining why the agency, 
        Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest did not meet the 
        deadline and what actions it intends to take to 
        complete or issue the required review, analysis, or 
        opinion or determination on issuing a permit, license, 
        or approval.
            (3) Report to congress.--Not later than 30 days 
        after the date of receipt of a report under paragraph 
        (2), the Secretary shall compile and submit a report to 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives, the Committee on 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and the 
        Council on Environmental Quality, describing any 
        deadlines identified in paragraph (1), and any 
        information provided to the Secretary by the Federal, 
        State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or 
        non-Federal interest involved under paragraph (2).
    (i) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or 
interfere with--
            (1) any statutory requirement for seeking public 
        comment;
            (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a 
        Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian 
        tribe, or non-Federal interest has with respect to 
        carrying out a water resources project; or
            (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of 
        the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the 
        regulations issued by the Council on Environmental 
        Quality to carry out such Act.

SEC. 2046. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``two years'' and inserting 
                ``year''; and
                    (B) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5'';
            (2) in the last sentence by striking ``30 months 
        after the date'' and inserting ``the last date of the 
        fiscal year following the fiscal year in which''; and
            (3) in the last sentence by striking ``such 30 
        month period'' and inserting ``such period''.

SEC. 2047. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.

    (a) Hopper Dredge Mcfarland.--Section 563 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3784) is amended 
to read as follows:

``SEC. 563. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.

    ``(a) Placement in Ready Reserve Status.--Not before 
October 1, 2009, and not after December 31, 2009, the Secretary 
shall--
            ``(1) place the Federal hopper dredge McFarland 
        (referred to in this section as the `vessel') in a 
        ready reserve status; and
            ``(2) use the vessel solely for urgent and 
        emergency purposes in accordance with existing 
        emergency response protocols.
    ``(b) Routine Tests and Maintenance.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall periodically 
        perform routine underway dredging tests of the 
        equipment (not to exceed 70 days per year) of the 
        vessel in a ready reserve status to ensure the ability 
        of the vessel to perform urgent and emergency work.
            ``(2) Maintenance.--The Secretary--
                    ``(A) shall not assign any scheduled hopper 
                dredging work to the vessel other than dredging 
                tests in the Delaware River and Bay; but
                    ``(B) shall perform any repairs, including 
                any asbestos abatement, necessary to maintain 
                the vessel in a ready reserve fully operational 
                condition.
    ``(c) Active Status for Dredging.--The Secretary, in 
consultation with affected stakeholders, shall place the vessel 
in active status in order to perform dredging work if the 
Secretary determines that private industry has failed--
            ``(1) to submit a responsive and responsible bid 
        for work advertised by the Secretary; or
            ``(2) to carry out a project as required pursuant 
        to a contract between the industry and the 
        Secretary.''.
    (b) Hopper Dredges Essayons and Yaquina.--Section 
3(c)(7)(B) of the Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 
Stat. 423), is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``This subparagraph shall not apply to the Federal hopper 
dredges Essayons and Yaquina of the Corps of Engineers.''.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944) is amended to read as 
follows:

``SEC. 111. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    ``(a) Construction of New Facilities.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the 
        following definitions apply:
                    ``(A) Existing facility.--The term 
                `existing facility' means the administrative 
                and maintenance facility for the project for 
                Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, 
                authorized by the first section of the River 
                and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 5, 1884 
                (24 Stat. 141), in existence on the date of 
                enactment of the Water Resources Development 
                Act of 2007.
                    ``(B) Parcel.--The term `Parcel' means the 
                land owned by the Corps of Engineers serving as 
                the operations and maintenance facility of the 
                Corps of Engineers in the city of Tuscaloosa, 
                Alabama, in existence on the date of enactment 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
            ``(2) Authorization.--In carrying out the project 
        for Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, the 
        Secretary is authorized, at Federal expense--
                    ``(A) to purchase land on which the 
                Secretary may construct a new maintenance 
                facility for the project, to be located--
                            ``(i) at a different location from 
                        the existing facility; and
                            ``(ii) in the vicinity of the city 
                        of Tuscaloosa, Alabama;
                    ``(B) at any time during or after the 
                completion of (and relocation to) the new 
                maintenance facility, to demolish the existing 
                facility; and
                    ``(C) to construct on the Parcel a new 
                administrative facility for the project.
    ``(b) Acquisition and Disposition of Property.--The 
Secretary--
            ``(1) may acquire any real property necessary for 
        the construction of the new maintenance facility under 
        subsection (a)(2)(A); and
            ``(2) shall convey to the city of Tuscaloosa fee 
        simple title in and to any portion of the Parcel not 
        required for construction of the new administrative 
        facility under subsection (a)(2)(C) through--
                    ``(A) sale at fair market value;
                    ``(B) exchange for city of Tuscaloosa owned 
                land on an acre-for-acre basis; or
                    ``(C) any combination of a sale under 
                subparagraph (A) and an exchange under 
                subparagraph (B).
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $32,000,000.''.

SEC. 3002. COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    Section 118(a)(3) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (title I of division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005; 118 Stat. 2945) is 
amended by inserting ``as part of the operation and maintenance 
of such project modification'' after ``by the Secretary''.

SEC. 3003. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, being 
carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3004. SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The project for navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska, 
authorized by section 101(a)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to extend the existing breakwater by 
approximately 215 feet, at a total cost of $3,333,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $2,666,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $667,000.

SEC. 3005. SITKA, ALASKA.

    The Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for navigation, 
Southeast Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by 
section 101(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4801), is modified to direct the Secretary to take 
such action as is necessary to correct design deficiencies in 
the Sitka Harbor Breakwater at Federal expense. The estimated 
cost is $6,300,000.

SEC. 3006. TATITLEK, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project for navigation, Tatitlek, Alaska, being carried 
out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577), shall be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3007. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Rio De Flag, 
Flagstaff, Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a total cost of $54,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost of $19,100,000.

SEC. 3008. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and 
tributaries, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and 
modified by section 303 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) and section 302 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2600), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
cost of $25,410,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$22,930,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,480,000.

SEC. 3009. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and recreation, Tucson drainage area, Arizona, 
authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
cost of $66,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$43,350,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,350,000.

SEC. 3010. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Osceola 
Harbor, Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to allow 
non-Federal interests to construct a mooring facility within 
the existing authorized harbor channel, subject to all 
necessary permits, certifications, and other requirements.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as affecting the responsibility of 
the Secretary to maintain the general navigation features of 
the project at a bottom width of 250 feet.

SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, St. Francis River Basin, 
Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by the Act of June 15, 1936 
(49 Stat. 1508), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
undertake channel stabilization and sediment removal measures 
on the St. Francis River and tributaries as a nonseparable 
element of the original project.

SEC. 3012. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS.

    The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for flood 
protection, Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by 
section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078), 
is modified--
            (1) to add environmental restoration as a project 
        purpose; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project, including 
        treatment and distributions components, over a 30-year 
        period in accordance with section 103(k) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)).

SEC. 3013. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 173) is amended in the matter under the heading 
``red-ouachita river basin'' by striking ``improvements at 
Calion, Arkansas'' and inserting ``improvements at Calion, 
Arkansas (including authorization for the comprehensive flood-
control project for Ouachita River and tributaries, 
incorporating in the project all flood control, drainage, and 
power improvements in the basin above the lower end of the left 
bank Ouachita River levee)''.
    (b) Modification.--Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 
August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 642), is amended in the second 
sentence of subsection (a) in the matter under the heading 
``lower mississippi river'' by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ``; except that the Ouachita River 
Levees, Louisiana, authorized by the first section of the 
Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 
534), shall remain as a component of the Mississippi River and 
Tributaries Project and afforded operation and maintenance 
responsibilities as provided under section 3 of that Act (45 
Stat. 535)''.

SEC. 3014. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cache Creek 
Basin, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to mitigate the impacts of the new 
south levee of the Cache Creek settling basin on the storm 
drainage system of the city of Woodland, including all 
appurtenant features, erosion control measures, and 
environmental protection features.
    (b) Objectives.--Mitigation under subsection (a) shall 
restore the preproject capacity of the city of Woodland to 
release 1,360 cubic feet per second of water to the Yolo Bypass 
and shall include--
            (1) channel improvements;
            (2) an outlet work through the west levee of the 
        Yolo Bypass; and
            (3) a new low flow cross channel to handle city and 
        county storm drainage and settling basin flows (1,760 
        cubic feet per second) when the Yolo Bypass is in a low 
        flow condition.

SEC. 3015. CALFED STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 103(f)(3) of the Water Supply, 
Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (118 Stat. 1695-
1696) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``within the 
        Delta (as defined in Cal. Water Code Sec. 12220)'';
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(C) Justification.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding 
                        section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 
                        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), in carrying 
                        out levee stability programs and 
                        projects pursuant to this paragraph, 
                        the Secretary of the Army may determine 
                        that the programs and projects are 
                        justified by the benefits of the 
                        project purposes described in 
                        subparagraph (A), and the programs and 
                        projects shall require no additional 
                        economic justification if the Secretary 
                        of the Army further determines that the 
                        programs and projects are cost 
                        effective.
                            ``(ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) 
                        shall not apply to any separable 
                        element intended to produce benefits 
                        that are predominantly unrelated to the 
                        project purposes described in 
                        subparagraph (A).''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (D)(i) by inserting ``as 
        described in the Record of Decision'' after ``Public 
        Law 84-99 standard)''.
    (b) Additional Authorization of Appropriations.--In 
addition to funds made available pursuant to the Water Supply, 
Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law 108-
361) to carry out section 103(f)(3)(D) of that Act (118 Stat. 
1696), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
projects described in that section $106,000,000, to remain 
available until expended.

SEC. 3016. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Los Angeles Drainage Area, 
California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), is modified to add 
environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.

SEC. 3017. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson 
Creek/Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the 
        Federal interest in the project.

SEC. 3018. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton 
Airfield, California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated July 19, 2004, at a total cost of $228,100,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $171,100,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $57,000,000.

SEC. 3019. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
                    CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, 
California, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091) is modified--
            (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton 
        Ship Channel element of the project may be provided in 
        the form of in-kind services and materials; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of such element the cost of planning and 
        design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
        such element before the date of an agreement for such 
        planning and design.

SEC. 3020. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3658), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project, or 
provide reimbursement not to exceed $800,000, for the costs of 
any work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
project before the date of the project partnership agreement.

SEC. 3021. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, 
Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to determine whether maintenance of the 
project is feasible, and if the Secretary determines that 
maintenance of the project is feasible, to carry out such 
maintenance.

SEC. 3022. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
Llagas Creek, California, authorized by section 501(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 333), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to carry out the project at a 
total cost of $105,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$65,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,000,000.
    (b) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the 
project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement 
the project.

SEC. 3023. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for Magpie Creek, California, 
authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
(33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to direct the Secretary to apply 
the cost-sharing requirements of section 103(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085) for the 
portion of the project consisting of land acquisition to 
preserve and enhance existing floodwater storage.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
    (c) Cost.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
$10,000,000.

SEC. 3024. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific 
Flyway Center, Sacramento, California, being carried out under 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to authorize the Secretary to expend 
$2,000,000 to enhance public access to the project.

SEC. 3025. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Petaluma River, 
Petaluma, California, authorized by section 112 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2587), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
cost of $41,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$26,975,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,525,000.

SEC. 3026. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Pinole Creek Phase I, California, being carried 
out under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary 
to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3027. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam 
element of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River 
Mainstem, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the 
Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation for Prado Dam for 
Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the Department 
of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including all 
the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall remain 
in effect for volumes of water made available prior to such 
modifications.

SEC. 3028. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary may dredge the Redwood City Navigation 
Channel, California, on an annual basis, to maintain the 
authorized depth of -30 feet mean lower low water.

SEC. 3029. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Natomas Levee Features.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control and 
        recreation, Sacramento and American Rivers, California 
        (Natomas Levee features), authorized by section 9159 of 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 
        Stat. 1944), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
        credit $20,503,000 to the Sacramento Area Flood Control 
        Agency for the nonreimbursed Federal share of costs 
        incurred by the Agency in connection with the project.
            (2) Allocation of credit.--The Secretary shall 
        allocate the amount to be credited pursuant to 
        paragraph (1) toward the non-Federal share of such 
        projects as are requested by the Sacramento Area Flood 
        Control Agency.
    (b) Joint Federal Project at Folsom Dam.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control, 
        American and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized 
        by section 101(a)(6)(A) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274) and modified by 
        section 128 of the Energy and Water Development 
        Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is modified 
        to authorize the Secretary to construct the auxiliary 
        spillway generally in accordance with the Post 
        Authorization Change Report, American River Watershed 
        Project (Folsom Dam Modification and Folsom Dam Raise 
        Projects), dated March 2007, at a total cost of 
        $683,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $444,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $239,000,000.
            (2) Dam safety.--Nothing in this subsection limits 
        the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry 
        out dam safety activities in connection with the 
        auxiliary spillway in accordance with the Bureau of 
        Reclamation safety of dams program.
            (3) Transfer of funds.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary and the 
                Secretary of the Interior are authorized to 
                transfer between the Department of the Army and 
                the Department of the Interior appropriated 
                amounts and other available funds (including 
                funds contributed by non-Federal interests) for 
                the purpose of planning, design, and 
                construction of the auxiliary spillway.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--Any transfer 
                made pursuant to this subsection shall be 
                subject to such terms and conditions as may be 
                agreed on by the Secretary and the Secretary of 
                the Interior.

SEC. 3030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.

SEC. 3031. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 202 of the River Basin Monetary Authorization Act 
of 1974 (88 Stat. 49) is amended by striking ``and the monetary 
authorization'' and all that follows through the period at the 
end and inserting ``; except that the lineal feet in the second 
phase shall be increased from 405,000 lineal feet to 485,000 
lineal feet.''.

SEC. 3032. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
definitions apply:
            (1) Salton sea authority.--The term ``Salton Sea 
        Authority'' means the joint powers authority 
        established under the laws of the State by a joint 
        power agreement signed on June 2, 1993.
            (2) Salton sea science office.--The term ``Salton 
        Sea Science Office'' means the office established by 
        the United States Geological Survey and located on the 
        date of enactment of this Act in La Quinta, California.
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of 
        California.
    (b) Pilot Projects.--
            (1) In general.--
                    (A) Review.--The Secretary shall review the 
                plan approved by the State, entitled the 
                ``Salton Sea Ecosystem Restoration Program 
                Preferred Alternative Report and Funding 
                Plan'', and dated May 2007 to determine whether 
                the pilot projects described in the plan are 
                feasible.
                    (B) Implementation.--
                            (i) In general.--Subject to clause 
                        (ii), if the Secretary determines that 
                        the pilot projects referred to in 
                        subparagraph (A) meet the requirements 
                        described in that subparagraph, the 
                        Secretary may--
                                    (I) enter into an agreement 
                                with the State; and
                                    (II) in consultation with 
                                the Salton Sea Authority and 
                                the Salton Sea Science Office, 
                                carry out pilot projects for 
                                improvement of the environment 
                                in the area of the Salton Sea.
                            (ii) Requirement.--The Secretary 
                        shall be a party to each contract for 
                        construction entered into under this 
                        subparagraph.
            (2) Local participation.--In prioritizing pilot 
        projects under this section, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) consult with the State, the Salton Sea 
                Authority, and the Salton Sea Science Office; 
                and
                    (B) take into consideration the priorities 
                of the State and the Salton Sea Authority.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Before carrying out a pilot 
        project under this section, the Secretary shall enter 
        into a written agreement with the State that requires 
        the non-Federal interest for the pilot project to pay 
        35 percent of the total costs of the pilot project.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out subsection (b) $30,000,000, of 
which not more than $5,000,000 shall be used for any one pilot 
project under this section.

SEC. 3033. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem 
(including Santiago Creek, California), authorized by section 
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-111) and 
section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3713), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to 
carry out the project at a total cost of $1,800,000,000 and to 
clarify that the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line is an element 
of the project.

SEC. 3034. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Santa Barbara 
streams, Lower Mission Creek, California, authorized by section 
101(b)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $30,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $15,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $15,000,000.

SEC. 3035. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Santa Cruz Harbor, California, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 300) and modified by section 809 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4168) and section 
526 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
346), is modified to direct the Secretary--
            (1) to renegotiate the memorandum of agreement with 
        the non-Federal interest to increase the annual payment 
        to reflect the updated cost of operation and 
        maintenance that is the Federal and non-Federal share 
        as provided by law based on the project purpose; and
            (2) to revise the memorandum of agreement to 
        include terms that revise such payments for inflation.

SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 
Stat. 1329-11), section 102(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), and section 311 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), 
is modified to direct the Secretary--
            (1) to include ecosystem restoration benefits in 
        the calculation of benefits for the Seven Oaks Dam, 
        California, portion of the project; and
            (2) to conduct a study of water conservation and 
        water quality at the Seven Oaks Dam.

SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
Upper Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 
101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 275), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project generally in accordance with the Upper Guadalupe 
River Flood Damage Reduction, San Jose, California, Limited 
Reevaluation Report, dated March 2004, at a total cost of 
$256,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $136,700,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $119,300,000.

SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek 
Channel, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the 
        Federal interest in the project.

SEC. 3039. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being 
carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3040. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San 
Pablo Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project and to authorize the Secretary to 
consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in determining 
the Federal interest in the project.

SEC. 3041. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is 
modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
        project at a total cost of $107,700,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $70,000,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $37,700,000; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3042. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO.

    Section 808 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4168) is amended by striking ``agriculture,'' and 
inserting ``agriculture, environmental restoration,''.

SEC. 3043. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
                    DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware 
River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by 
the first section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 
1935 (49 Stat. 1030), and section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249), is modified to add recreation as a 
project purpose.

SEC. 3044. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE.

    Section 102(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4612) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``The Secretary shall assume ownership 
responsibility for the replacement bridge not later than the 
date on which the construction of the bridge is completed and 
the contractors are released of their responsibility by the 
State. In addition, the Secretary may not carry out any action 
to close or remove the St. George's Bridge, Delaware, without 
specific congressional authorization.''.

SEC. 3045. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Shoreline.--The project for shoreline protection, 
Brevard County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to include the mid-reach as 
an element of the project from the Florida department of 
environmental protection monuments 75.4 to 118.3, a distance of 
approximately 7.6 miles. The restoration work shall only be 
undertaken upon a determination by the Secretary, following 
completion of the general reevaluation report authorized by 
section 418 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2637), that the shoreline protection is feasible.
    (b) Credit.--Section 310 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary 
may credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project for shore protection the cost of 
nourishment and renourishment associated with the project for 
shore protection incurred by the non-Federal interest to 
respond to damages to Brevard County beaches that are the 
result of a Federal navigation project, as determined in the 
final report for the study.''.

SEC. 3046. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and 
Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), and modified by 
section 311 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 301), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of mitigation construction and derelict 
erosion control structure removal carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3047. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    In carrying out the project for navigation, Canaveral 
Harbor, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1174), the Secretary shall 
construct a sediment trap if the Secretary determines 
construction of the sediment trap is feasible.

SEC. 3048. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero 
Island segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized by section 201 
of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073), by Senate 
Resolution dated December 17, 1970, and by House Resolution 
dated December 15, 1970, and modified by section 309 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2602), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project.

SEC. 3049. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key 
Beach, Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized 
under section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and reauthorized by section 364(2)(A) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 313), 
is modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
$15,190,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,320,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,870,000, and at an 
estimated total cost of $65,000,000 for periodic nourishment 
over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $30,550,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$34,450,000.
    (b) Construction of Shoreline Protection Projects by Non-
Federal Interests.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest in 
accordance with section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1) for the modified project.

SEC. 3050. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Peanut Island, Palm Beach County, Florida, being 
carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be $9,750,000.

SEC. 3051. PORT SUTTON, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Port Sutton, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(b)(12) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a total 
cost of $12,900,000.

SEC. 3052. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out by 
the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3053. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct passing lanes in an area approximately 3.5 miles 
long and centered on Tampa Harbor Cut B if the Secretary 
determines that such improvements are necessary for navigation 
safety.
    (b) General Reevaluation Report.--The non-Federal share of 
the cost of the general reevaluation report for Tampa Harbor, 
Florida, being conducted on June 1, 2005, shall be the same 
percentage as the non-Federal share of the cost of construction 
of the project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new 
partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest to reflect 
the cost sharing required by subsection (b).

SEC. 3054. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.

    (a) Land Exchange.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange land 
        above 863 feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, 
        identified in the Real Estate Design Memorandum 
        prepared by the Mobile district engineer, April 5, 
        1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for land on the 
        north side of Allatoona Lake that is required for 
        wildlife management and protection of the water quality 
        and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land 
        exchanges under this subsection shall be a fair market 
        appraisal to ensure that land exchanged is of equal 
        value.
    (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Land, Allatoona Lake, 
Georgia.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may--
                    (A) sell land above 863 feet in elevation 
                at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
                memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1); 
                and
                    (B) use the proceeds of the sale, without 
                further appropriation, to pay costs associated 
                with the purchase of land required for wildlife 
                management and protection of the water quality 
                and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) Willing sellers.--Land acquired under 
                this subsection shall be by negotiated purchase 
                from willing sellers only.
                    (B) Basis.--The basis for all transactions 
                under this subsection shall be a fair market 
                value appraisal acceptable to the Secretary.
                    (C) Sharing of costs.--Each purchaser of 
                land under this subsection shall share in the 
                associated costs of the purchase, including 
                surveys and associated fees in accordance with 
                the memorandum referred to in subsection 
                (a)(1).
                    (D) Other conditions.--The Secretary may 
                impose on the sale and purchase of land under 
                this subsection such other conditions as the 
                Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.

SEC. 3055. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia, being carried 
out under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be $6,175,000.

SEC. 3056. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out additional 
general construction measures to allow for operation at lower 
pool levels to satisfy the recreation mission at Dworshak Dam, 
Idaho.
    (b) Improvements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall provide for appropriate improvements to--
            (1) facilities that are operated by the Corps of 
        Engineers; and
            (2) facilities that, as of the date of enactment of 
        this Act, are leased, permitted, or licensed for use by 
        others.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary shall carry out this 
section through a cost-sharing program with Idaho State parks 
and recreation department at a total estimated project cost of 
$5,300,000. Notwithstanding section 103 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2313), the Federal share of 
such cost shall be 75 percent.

SEC. 3057. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Gooding, 
Idaho, constructed under the emergency conservation work 
program established under the Act of March 31, 1933 (16 U.S.C. 
585 et seq.), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to rehabilitate the 
        Gooding Channel project for the purposes of flood 
        control and ecosystem restoration if the Secretary 
        determines that such rehabilitation is not required as 
        a result of improper operation and maintenance of the 
        project by the non-Federal interest and that the 
        rehabilitation and ecosystem restoration is feasible; 
        and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to plan, design, and 
        construct the project at a total cost of $9,000,000.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--Costs for reconstruction of a 
        project under this section shall be shared by the 
        Secretary and the non-Federal interest in the same 
        percentages as the costs of construction of the 
        original project were shared.
            (2) Operation, maintenance, and repair costs.--The 
        costs of operation, maintenance, repair, and 
        rehabilitation of a project carried out under this 
        section shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
    (c) Economic Justification.--Reconstruction efforts and 
activities carried out under this section shall not require 
economic justification.

SEC. 3058. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Muscooten Bay, 
Illinois River, Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, 
Illinois, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified--
            (1) to include the channel between the harbor and 
        the Illinois River; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to enter into a 
        partnership agreement with the city of Beardstown to 
        replace the local cooperation agreement dated August 
        18, 1983, with the Beardstown Community Park District.
    (b) Terms of Partnership Agreement.--The partnership 
agreement referred to in subsection (a) shall include the same 
rights and responsibilities as the local cooperation agreement 
dated August 18, 1983, changing only the identity of the non-
Federal sponsor.
    (c) Maintenance.--Following execution of the partnership 
agreement referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may 
carry out maintenance of the project referred to in subsection 
(a) on an annual basis.

SEC. 3059. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.

    The Cache River Levee constructed for flood control at the 
Cache River, Illinois, and authorized by the Act of June 28, 
1938 (52 Stat. 1217), is modified to add environmental 
restoration as a project purpose.

SEC. 3060. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The Federal navigation channel for the North Branch Channel 
portion of the Chicago River authorized by section 22 of the 
Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1156), extending from 100 feet 
downstream of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet upstream of 
the Division Street Bridge, Chicago, Illinois, shall be no 
wider than 66 feet.

SEC. 3061. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
                    ILLINOIS.

    (a) Treatment as Single Project.--The Chicago Sanitary and 
Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier Project (in this section referred 
to as ``Barrier I''), as in existence on the date of enactment 
of this Act and constructed as a demonstration project under 
section 1202(i)(3) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance 
Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4722(i)(3)), and 
the project relating to the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal 
Dispersal Barrier, authorized by section 345 of the District of 
Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 
Stat. 1352) (in this section referred to as ``Barrier II'') 
shall be considered to constitute a single project.
    (b) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, 
        shall--
                    (A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
                    (B) construct Barrier II, notwithstanding 
                the project cooperation agreement with the 
                State of Illinois dated June 14, 2005;
                    (C) operate and maintain Barrier I and 
                Barrier II as a system to optimize 
                effectiveness;
                    (D) conduct, in consultation with 
                appropriate Federal, State, local, and 
                nongovernmental entities, a study of a range of 
                options and technologies for reducing impacts 
                of hazards that may reduce the efficacy of the 
                Barriers; and
                    (E) provide to each State a credit in an 
                amount equal to the amount of funds contributed 
                by the State toward Barrier II.
            (2) Use of credit.--A State may apply a credit 
        provided to the State under paragraph (1)(E) to any 
        cost sharing responsibility for an existing or future 
        Federal project carried out by the Secretary in the 
        State.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 345 of the District of 
Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 
Stat. 1352) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 345. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, 
                    ILLINOIS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may 
be necessary to carry out the Barrier II element of the project 
for the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, 
Illinois, initiated pursuant to section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2294 note; 100 
Stat. 4251).''.
    (d) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental 
entities, shall conduct, at Federal expense, a feasibility 
study of the range of options and technologies available to 
prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species between the 
Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins through the Chicago 
Sanitary and Ship Canal and other aquatic pathways.

SEC. 3062. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
that may be expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
restoration, Emiquon, Illinois, being carried out under section 
206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330), shall be $7,500,000.
    (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance 
under section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for 
flood control, and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 
1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3063. LASALLE, ILLINOIS.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary 
shall give priority to work in the vicinity of LaSalle, 
Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan Canal.

SEC. 3064. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Spunky 
Bottoms, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control 
Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1583), is modified to add 
environmental restoration as a project purpose.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
that may be expended for the project for improvement of the 
quality of the environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being 
carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), shall be $7,500,000.
    (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance 
under section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for 
flood control, and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 
1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
    (d) Post Construction Monitoring and Management.--Of the 
Federal funds expended under subsection (b), not less than 
$500,000 shall remain available for a period of 5 years after 
the date of completion of construction of the modifications for 
use in carrying out post construction monitoring and adaptive 
management.

SEC. 3065. CEDAR LAKE, INDIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to plan, 
design, and construct an aquatic ecosystem restoration project 
at Cedar Lake, Indiana.
    (b) Complete Feasibility Report.--In planning the project 
authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall expedite 
completion of the feasibility report for the project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection, Cedar Lake, 
Indiana, initiated pursuant to section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
    (c) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated $11,050,000 to carry out the activities 
        authorized by this section.
            (2) Other.--The Secretary is authorized to use 
        funds previously appropriated for the project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection, Cedar 
        Lake, Indiana, under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) to carry out the 
        activities authorized by this section.

SEC. 3066. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, 
Indiana, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) and modified 
by section 520 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2655), is modified to direct the Secretary to seek 
to reduce the cost of the project by using innovative 
technologies and cost reduction measures determined from a 
review of non-Federal lake dredging projects in the vicinity of 
Koontz Lake.

SEC. 3067. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of 
White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586), and 
modified by section 323 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
        ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage 
        reduction components described in the Central 
        Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, dated February 
        1994, and revised by the Master Plan Revision Central 
        Indianapolis Waterfront, dated April 2004, at a total 
        cost of $28,545,000; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3068. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA.

    The project for the Des Moines Recreational River and 
Greenbelt, Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99-88 and modified by 
section 604 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4153), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage 
reduction components of the project, at a Federal cost of 
$10,000,000.

SEC. 3069. PERRY CREEK, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--On making a determination described in 
subsection (b), the Secretary shall increase the Federal 
contribution by up to $4,000,000 for the project for flood 
control, Perry Creek, Iowa, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4116) and 
modified by section 151 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2004 (117 Stat. 1844).
    (b) Determination.--A determination referred to in 
subsection (a) is a determination that a modification to the 
project described in subsection (a) is necessary for the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to certify that the project 
provides flood damage reduction benefits to at least a 100-year 
level of flood protection.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $4,000,000.

SEC. 3070. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

    (a) Right of First Refusal.--The Secretary shall provide, 
in accordance with the recommendations in the Rathbun Lake 
Reallocation Report approved by the Chief of Engineers on July 
22, 1985, the Rathbun Regional Water Association with the right 
of first refusal to contract for or purchase any increment of 
the remaining allocation of 8,320 acre-feet of water supply 
storage in Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
    (b) Payment of Cost.--The Rathbun Regional Water 
Association shall pay the cost of any water supply storage 
allocation provided under subsection (a).

SEC. 3071. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY.

    The project for Hickman Bluff, Kentucky, authorized by 
chapter II of title II of the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations and Rescissions for the Department of Defense to 
Preserve and Enhance Military Readiness Act of 1995 (109 Stat. 
85), is modified to authorize the Secretary to repair and 
restore the project, at Federal expense, with no further 
economic studies or analyses, at a total cost of not more than 
$250,000.

SEC. 3072. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA.

    Section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) is amended by striking 
``$219,600,000'' each place it appears and inserting 
``$430,000,000''.

SEC. 3073. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.

    The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for 
flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and 
Cumberland Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide a 
100-year level of flood protection for the city of 
Prestonsburg.

SEC. 3074. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
                    PARISH WATERSHED.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish 
Watershed, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified 
by section 116 of division D of Public Law 108-7 (117 Stat. 
140), is further modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the 
        project with the cost sharing for the project 
        determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996;
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
        project at a total cost of $187,000,000; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3075. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Acquisition of Additional Land.--The public access 
feature of the project for flood control, Atchafalaya Basin 
Floodway System, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to acquire from willing 
sellers the fee interest (exclusive of oil, gas, and minerals) 
of an additional 20,000 acres of land in the Lower Atchafalaya 
Basin Floodway for such feature.
    (b) Modification.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), 
        effective November 17, 1986, the $32,000,000 limitation 
        on the maximum Federal expenditure for the first costs 
        of the public access feature referred to in subsection 
        (a) shall not apply.
            (2) Cost.--The modification under paragraph (1) 
        shall not increase the total authorized cost of the 
        project referred to in subsection (a).
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 315(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603) is amended 
by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``and 
shall consider Eagle Point Park, Jeanerette, Louisiana, and the 
town of Melville, Louisiana, as site alternatives for such 
recreation features''.

SEC. 3076. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, REGIONAL VISITOR CENTER, 
                    LOUISIANA.

    (a) Project for Flood Control.--Notwithstanding paragraph 
(3) of the report of the Chief of Engineers dated February 28, 
1983 (relating to recreational development in the Lower 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway), the Secretary shall carry out the 
project for flood control, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, 
Louisiana, authorized by chapter IV of title I of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313) and 
section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4142).
    (b) Visitors Center.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the State of Louisiana, shall study, design, and 
        construct a type A regional visitors center in the 
        vicinity of Morgan City, Louisiana.
            (2) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) Cost of type b visitors center.--The 
                cost of construction of the visitors center up 
                to the cost of construction of a type B 
                visitors center shall be shared in accordance 
                with the recreation cost-sharing requirement of 
                section 103(c) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)).
                    (B) Cost of upgrading.--The non-Federal 
                share of the cost of upgrading the visitors 
                center from a type B to type A regional 
                visitors center shall be 100 percent.
                    (C) Operation and maintenance.--The cost of 
                operation and maintenance of the visitors 
                center shall be a Federal responsibility.
            (3) Donations.--In carrying out the project under 
        this subsection, the Mississippi River Commission may 
        accept the donation of cash or other funds, land, 
        materials, and services from any non-Federal government 
        entity or nonprofit corporation, as the Commission 
        determines to be appropriate.

SEC. 3077. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, 
                    LOUISIANA.

    The project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and Bayous 
Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, authorized by section 101 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to deepen up to a 1000-foot section 
of the area on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway west of the Bayou 
Boeuf Lock and east of the intersection of the Atchafalaya 
River, at a cost not to exceed $200,000, to provide for ingress 
and egress to the port of Morgan City at a depth not to exceed 
20 feet.

SEC. 3078. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.

    The project for the improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried out 
under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3079. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA.

    The project for the Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
(74 Stat. 481), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
provide $3,000,000 for each fiscal year, in a total amount of 
$15,000,000, for such rock bank protection of the Calcasieu 
River from mile 5 to mile 16 as the Secretary determines to be 
advisable to reduce maintenance dredging needs and facilitate 
protection of disposal areas for the Calcasieu River and Pass, 
Louisiana, if the Secretary determines that the rock bank 
protection is feasible.

SEC. 3080. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Red 
River Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and 
modified by section 4(h) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 102(p) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), section 301(b)(7) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3710), 
and section 316 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2604), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
        project at a total cost of $33,912,000;
            (2) to authorize the purchase and reforestation of 
        lands that have been cleared or converted to 
        agricultural uses (in addition to the purchase of 
        bottomland hardwood); and
            (3) to incorporate wildlife and forestry management 
        practices to improve species diversity on mitigation 
        land that meets habitat goals and objectives of the 
        United States and the State of Louisiana.

SEC. 3081. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized 
as part of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077) and modified by section 365 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the costs of relocating oyster beds in the Davis Pond project 
area.

SEC. 3082. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET RELOCATION ASSISTANCE, 
                    LOUISIANA.

    (a) Port Facilities Relocation.--
            (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to the Assistant 
        Secretary for Economic Development (referred to in this 
        section as the ``Assistant Secretary'') $75,000,000, to 
        remain available until expended, to support the 
        relocation of Port of New Orleans deep draft facilities 
        from the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet (referred to in 
        this section as the ``Outlet''), the Gulf Intracoastal 
        Waterway, and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to the 
        Mississippi River.
            (2) Administration.--
                    (A) In general.--Amounts appropriated 
                pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be administered 
                by the Assistant Secretary pursuant to sections 
                209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and 
                Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 
                3149(c)(2), 3233).
                    (B) Requirement.--The Assistant Secretary 
                shall make amounts appropriated pursuant to 
                paragraph (1) available to the Port of New 
                Orleans to relocate to the Mississippi River 
                within the State of Louisiana the port-owned 
                facilities that are occupied by businesses in 
                the vicinity that may be impacted due to the 
                treatment of the Outlet under title VII of this 
                Act.
    (b) Revolving Loan Fund Grants.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Assistant Secretary $85,000,000, to remain 
available until expended, to provide assistance pursuant to 
sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and Economic 
Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 3233) to one or 
more eligible recipients under such Act to establish revolving 
loan funds to make loans for terms up to 20 years at or below 
market interest rates (including interest-free loans) to 
private businesses within the Port of New Orleans that may need 
to relocate to the Mississippi River within the State of 
Louisiana due to the treatment of the Outlet under title VII of 
this Act.
    (c) Requirements.--In selecting one or more recipients 
under subsection (b), the Assistant Secretary shall ensure that 
each recipient has established procedures to target lending to 
businesses that will be directly and substantially impacted by 
the treatment of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet under title 
VII of this Act.
    (d) Coordination With Secretary.--The Assistant Secretary 
shall ensure that the programs described in subsections (a) and 
(b) are coordinated with the Secretary to ensure that 
facilities are relocated in a manner that is consistent with 
the analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection 
authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
    (e) Administrative Expenses.--The Assistant Secretary may 
use up to 2 percent of the amounts made available under 
subsections (a) and (b) for administrative expenses.

SEC. 3083. VIOLET, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Violet Diversion Project.--The Secretary shall design 
and implement a project for a diversion of freshwater at or 
near Violet, Louisiana, for the purposes of reducing salinity 
in the western Mississippi Sound, enhancing oyster production, 
and promoting the sustainability of coastal wetlands.
    (b) Salinity Levels.--The project shall be designed to 
meet, or maximize the ability to meet, the salinity levels 
identified in the feasibility study of the Corps of Engineers 
entitled ``Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas: 
Freshwater Diversion to Lake Pontchartrain Basin and 
Mississippi Sound'' and dated 1984.
    (c) Additional Measures.--
            (1) Recommendations.--If the Secretary determines 
        that the diversion of freshwater at or near Violet, 
        Louisiana, will not restore salinity levels to meet the 
        requirements of subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
        recommend additional measures for freshwater diversions 
        sufficient to meet those levels.
            (2) Implementation.--The Secretary shall implement 
        measures included in the recommendations developed 
        under paragraph (1) beginning 60 days after the date on 
        which a report containing the recommendations is 
        provided to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (d) Non-Federal Financing Requirements.--
            (1) Estimates.--Before October 1 of each fiscal 
        year, the Secretary shall notify the States of 
        Louisiana and Mississippi of each State's respective 
        estimated costs for that fiscal year for the activities 
        authorized under this section.
            (2) Escrow.--The States of Louisiana and 
        Mississippi shall provide the funds described in 
        paragraph (1) by making a deposit into an escrow 
        account, or such other account, of the Treasury as the 
        Secretary determines to be acceptable within 30 days 
        after the date of receipt of the notification from the 
        Secretary under paragraph (1).
            (3) Deposits by louisiana.--
                    (A) Use of certain funds.--The State of 
                Louisiana may use funds available to the State 
                under the coastal impact assistance program 
                authorized under section 31 of the Outer 
                Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1356a) 
                in meeting its cost-sharing responsibilities 
                under this section.
                    (B) Failure to provide funds.--
                            (i) In general.--If the State of 
                        Louisiana does not provide the funds 
                        under paragraph (2), the Secretary of 
                        the Interior, using funds to be 
                        disbursed to the State under the 
                        program referred to in subparagraph (A) 
                        or under the Gulf of Mexico Energy 
                        Security Act of 2006 (title I of 
                        Division C of Public Law 109-432; (43 
                        U.S.C. 1331 note; 120 Stat. 3000)), 
                        shall deposit such funds as are 
                        necessary to meet the requirements for 
                        the State under paragraph (2).
                            (ii) Deadline for deposit.--Any 
                        deposit required under clause (i) shall 
                        be made prior to any other 
                        disbursements made to the State of 
                        Louisiana under the programs referred 
                        to in clause (i).
                    (C) Exception.--The State of Louisiana 
                shall not be required to make a deposit of its 
                share in any fiscal year in which the State of 
                Mississippi does not make its deposit following 
                a notification under paragraph (1) or the State 
                of Mississippi notifies the Secretary that it 
                does not intend to make a deposit in that 
                fiscal year.
            (4) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project for the costs of design work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project.
            (5) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of the project authorized by subsection (a) shall be 75 
        percent.
    (e) Schedule.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of 
        appropriations, the Secretary shall complete the design 
        of the project not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act and shall complete the 
        construction of the project by not later than September 
        30, 2012.
            (2) Missed deadline.--If the Secretary does not 
        complete the design or construction of the project in 
        accordance with paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
        complete the design or construction as expeditiously as 
        possible.

SEC. 3084. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
                    LOUISIANA.

    Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 304-305) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``operation and 
                maintenance'' and inserting ``operation, 
                maintenance, rehabilitation, repair, and 
                replacement''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and 
                inserting ``Algiers Canal Levees''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
the project shall be 35 percent.''.

SEC. 3085. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project being carried out under section 111 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the 
mitigation of shore damages attributable to the project for 
navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, shall be $26,900,000.

SEC. 3086. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND.

    Section 580(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 375) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$25,750,000'';
            (2) by striking ``$9,750,000'' and inserting 
        ``$16,738,000''; and
            (3) by striking ``$5,250,000'' and inserting 
        ``$9,012,000''.

SEC. 3087. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation and environmental restoration 
through the beneficial use of dredged material, Poplar Island, 
Maryland, authorized by section 537 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776) and modified by 
section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2604), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the expansion of the project in accordance with the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at an 
additional total cost of $260,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $195,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $65,000,000.

SEC. 3088. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and 
shoreline protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, 
Michigan, being carried out under section 14 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), is modified to include 
measures to enhance public access.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be 
$3,000,000.

SEC. 3089. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    Section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 326) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
definitions apply:
            ``(1) Management plan.--The term `management plan' 
        means the management plan for the St. Clair River and 
        Lake St. Clair, Michigan, that is in effect as of the 
        date of enactment of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 2007.
            ``(2) Partnership.--The term `Partnership' means 
        the partnership established by the Secretary under 
        subsection (b)(1).
    ``(b) Partnership.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish 
        and lead a partnership of appropriate Federal agencies 
        (including the Environmental Protection Agency) and the 
        State of Michigan (including political subdivisions of 
        the State)--
                    ``(A) to promote cooperation among the 
                Federal Government, State and local 
                governments, and other involved parties in the 
                management of the St. Clair River and Lake St. 
                Clair watersheds; and
                    ``(B) to develop and implement projects 
                consistent with the management plan.
            ``(2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Actions taken under this 
                section by the Partnership shall be coordinated 
                with actions to restore and conserve the St. 
                Clair River and Lake St. Clair and watersheds 
                taken under other provisions of Federal and 
                State law.
                    ``(B) No effect on other law.--Nothing in 
                this section alters, modifies, or affects any 
                other provision of Federal or State law.
    ``(c) Implementation of St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
Management Plan.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) develop a St. Clair River and Lake 
                St. Clair strategic implementation plan in 
                accordance with the management plan;
                    ``(B) provide technical, planning, and 
                engineering assistance to non-Federal interests 
                for developing and implementing activities 
                consistent with the management plan;
                    ``(C) plan, design, and implement projects 
                consistent with the management plan; and
                    ``(D) provide, in coordination with the 
                Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
                Agency, financial and technical assistance, 
                including grants, to the State of Michigan 
                (including political subdivisions of the State) 
                and interested nonprofit entities for the 
                Federal share of the cost of planning, design, 
                and implementation of projects to restore, 
                conserve, manage, and sustain the St. Clair 
                River, Lake St. Clair, and associated 
                watersheds.
            ``(2) Specific measures.--Financial and technical 
        assistance provided under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 
        paragraph (1) may be used in support of non-Federal 
        activities consistent with the management plan.
    ``(d) Supplements to Management Plan and Strategic 
Implementation Plan.--In consultation with the Partnership and 
after providing an opportunity for public review and comment, 
the Secretary shall develop information to supplement--
            ``(1) the management plan; and
            ``(2) the strategic implementation plan developed 
        under subsection (c)(1)(A).
    ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.''.

SEC. 3090. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall expedite development of the dredged 
material management plan for the project for navigation, St. 
Joseph Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299).

SEC. 3091. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The text of section 1149 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``The Secretary shall construct, at Federal expense, a 
second lock, of a width not less than 110 feet and a length not 
less than 1,200 feet, adjacent to the existing lock at Sault 
Sainte Marie, Michigan, generally in accordance with the report 
of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, dated May 19, 
1986, and the limited reevaluation report dated February 2004 
at a total cost of $341,714,000.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeals.--The following provisions are 
repealed:
            (1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620).
            (2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717).
            (3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305).

SEC. 3092. ADA, MINNESOTA.

    In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, 
Wild Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Secretary shall allow 
the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the 
detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying such 
section is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3093. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, 
McQuade Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified 
by section 321 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2605), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
provide public access and recreational facilities as generally 
described in the Detailed Project Report and Environmental 
Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, Minnesota, 
dated August 1999.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
for the costs of design work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be 
$9,000,000.

SEC. 3094. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Grand Marais, Minnesota, 
carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) is modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project the cost of design work carried out for 
the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project.

SEC. 3095. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall provide credit in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the navigation 
project for Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577), for the costs of design work carried out for the project 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3096. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement the 
locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite 
Falls, Minnesota, at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $4,000,000. In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary shall utilize, to the extent practicable, the 
existing detailed project report dated 2002 for the project 
prepared under the authority of section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the 
project under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-
Federal interests to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the 
detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying such 
section is necessary to implement the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the project the cost of 
design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of execution of a 
partnership agreement for the project.
    (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
that may be expended for the flood damage reduction shall be 
$8,000,000.

SEC. 3097. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors 
Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to develop a final design and prepare plans and 
specifications to correct the harbor entrance and mooring 
conditions at the project.

SEC. 3098. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The project for flood control, Red Lake River, Crookston, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified 
to include flood protection for the adjacent and interconnected 
areas generally known as the Sampson and Chase/Loring 
neighborhoods, in accordance with the feasibility report 
supplement for local flood protection, Crookston, Minnesota, at 
a total cost of $25,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$16,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,750,000.

SEC. 3099. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 
2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to include operation and 
maintenance of the general navigation facilities as a Federal 
responsibility.

SEC. 3100. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, 
carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include operation and 
maintenance of the general navigation facilities as a Federal 
responsibility.

SEC. 3101. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the requirements of 
section 107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577(a)), the project for navigation, Two Harbors, Minnesota, 
being carried out under such authority, is justified on the 
basis of navigation safety.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditures.--The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be 
$7,000,000.

SEC. 3102. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, 
Harrison County, Mississippi, being carried out under section 
204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 
2326), is modified to authorize the non-Federal interest to 
provide, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), any portion of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind 
services and materials.

SEC. 3103. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Modification.--Section 331 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) is amended by striking 
``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$9,000,000''.
    (b) Applicability of Credit.--The credit provided by 
section 331 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 305) (as amended by subsection (a) of this section) shall 
apply to costs incurred by the Jackson County Board of 
Supervisors during the period beginning on February 8, 1994, 
and ending on the date of enactment of this Act for projects 
authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 
Stat. 1494).

SEC. 3104. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, Mississippi, authorized 
by section 401(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4132), is modified to authorize the Secretary, 
subject to subsection (c), to construct the project generally 
in accordance with the plan described in the ``Pearl River 
Watershed, Mississippi, Feasibility Study Main Report, 
Preliminary Draft'', dated February 2007, at a total cost of 
$205,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $133,770,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $72,030,000.
    (b) Comparison of Alternatives.--Before initiating 
construction of the project, the Secretary shall compare the 
level of flood damage reduction provided by the plan that 
maximizes national economic development benefits of the project 
and the locally preferred plan, referred to as the LeFleur 
Lakes plan, to that portion of Jackson, Mississippi and 
vicinity, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam.
    (c) Implementation of Plan.--
            (1) In general.--If the Secretary determines under 
        subsection (b) that the locally preferred plan provides 
        a level of flood damage reduction that is equal to or 
        greater than the level of flood damage reduction 
        provided by the national economic development plan and 
        that the locally preferred plan is environmentally 
        acceptable and technically feasible, the Secretary may 
        construct the project identified as the national 
        economic development plan, or the locally preferred 
        plan, or some combination thereof.
            (2) Construction by non-federal interests.--The 
        non-Federal interest may carry out the project under 
        section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (d) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the 
project under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-
Federal interests to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the 
detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying such 
section is necessary to implement the project.
    (e) Non-Federal Cost Share.--If the locally preferred plan 
is selected for construction of the project, the Federal share 
of the cost of the project shall be limited to the share as 
provided by law for the elements of the national economic 
development plan.

SEC. 3105. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI.

    Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$13,000,000''.

SEC. 3106. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The portion of the L-15 levee system that is under the 
jurisdiction of the Consolidated North County Levee District 
and situated along the right descending bank of the Mississippi 
River from the confluence of that river with the Missouri River 
and running upstream approximately 14 miles shall be considered 
to be a Federal levee for purposes of cost sharing under 
section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3107. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-
Chesterfield, Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of the planning, design, and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3108. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI.

    The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Missouri, 
authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and section 102(13) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), 
are each modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.

SEC. 3109. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA.

    The Secretary may use funds appropriated to carry out the 
Missouri River recovery and mitigation program to assist the 
Bureau of Reclamation in the design and construction of the 
Lower Yellowstone project of the Bureau, Intake, Montana, for 
the purpose of ecosystem restoration.

SEC. 3110. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND NORTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Definition of Restoration Project.--In this section, 
the term ``restoration project'' means a project that will 
produce, in accordance with other Federal programs, projects, 
and activities, substantial ecosystem restoration and related 
benefits, as determined by the Secretary.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance 
with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, 
restoration projects in the watershed of the Yellowstone River 
and tributaries in Montana, and in North Dakota, to produce 
immediate and substantial ecosystem restoration and recreation 
benefits.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), 
the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with, and consider the activities being 
        carried out by--
                    (A) other Federal agencies;
                    (B) Indian tribes;
                    (C) conservation districts; and
                    (D) the Yellowstone River Conservation 
                District Council; and
            (2) seek the participation of the State of Montana.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.

SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, 
Lincoln, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of design and 
        construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project; and
            (2) to allow the non-Federal interest for the 
        project to use, and to direct the Secretary to accept, 
        funds provided under any other Federal program to 
        satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of 
        the project if the Federal agency that provides such 
        funds determines that the funds are authorized to be 
        used to carry out the project.

SEC. 3112. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
reduction, Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized by 
section 101(b)(20) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project or reimbursement for the 
        costs of any work performed by the non-Federal interest 
        for the project before the approval of the project 
        partnership agreement, including work performed by the 
        non-Federal interest in connection with the design and 
        construction of 7 upstream detention storage 
        structures;
            (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited 
        under paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds 
        from the non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the 
        project schedule.

SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, authorized 
by section 101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct the project at a total cost of $21,664,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $14,082,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $7,582,000.

SEC. 3114. LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, MCCARRAN RANCH, NEVADA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project being carried out, as of the date of enactment 
of this Act, under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) for environmental 
restoration of McCarran Ranch, Nevada, shall be $5,775,000.

SEC. 3115. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem 
restoration, shore protection, and hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified to 
incorporate the project for shoreline erosion control, Cape May 
Point, New Jersey, carried out under section 5 of the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost 
of protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved 
August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426h), if the Secretary determines 
that such incorporation is feasible.

SEC. 3116. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jersey 
and New York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and modified 
by section 327 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2607), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
include the benefits and costs of preserving natural flood 
storage in any future economic analysis of the project.

SEC. 3117. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with 
any Indian tribe any land of which is located in the State of 
New Mexico and occupied by a flood control project that is 
owned and operated by the Corps of Engineers to assist in 
carrying out any operation or maintenance activity associated 
with the flood control project.

SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Restoration Projects Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``restoration project'' means a project that will produce, 
consistent with other Federal programs, projects, and 
activities, immediate and substantial ecosystem restoration and 
recreation benefits.
    (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select and 
shall carry out restoration projects in the Middle Rio Grande 
from Cochiti Dam to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir 
in the State of New Mexico.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), 
the Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities 
being carried out by--
            (1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act 
        Collaborative Program; and
            (2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio 
        Grande Bosque Initiative.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 3119. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1176), is modified to include measures to enhance 
public access, at Federal cost of $500,000.

SEC. 3120. LONG ISLAND SOUND OYSTER RESTORATION, NEW YORK AND 
                    CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall plan, design, and 
construct projects to increase aquatic habitats within Long 
Island Sound and adjacent waters, including the construction 
and restoration of oyster beds and related shellfish habitat.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
activities carried out under this section shall be 25 percent 
and may be provided through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 3121. MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVERS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, NEW 
                    YORK.

    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the State of New York and local entities, shall 
        develop watershed management plans for the Mamaroneck 
        and Sheldrake River watershed for the purposes of 
        evaluating existing and new flood damage reduction and 
        ecosystem restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed 
        management plans, the Secretary shall use existing 
        studies and plans, as appropriate.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in 
        any eligible critical restoration project in the 
        Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed in accordance 
        with the watershed management plans developed under 
        subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration 
        project shall be eligible for assistance under this 
        section if the project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the 
                watershed management plans developed under 
                subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Mamaroneck and 
                Sheldrake Rivers watershed in New York, 
                consists of flood damage reduction or ecosystem 
                restoration through--
                            (i) bank stabilization of the 
                        mainstem, tributaries, and streams;
                            (ii) wetland restoration;
                            (iii) soil and water conservation;
                            (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                            (v) restoration of stream 
                        stability;
                            (vi) structural and nonstructural 
                        flood damage reduction measures; or
                            (vii) any other project or activity 
                        the Secretary determines to be 
                        appropriate.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative agreements 
to provide financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, 
or local governments or nonprofit agencies, including 
assistance for the implementation of projects to be carried out 
under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 3122. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``maximum Federal cost 
of $5,200,000'' and inserting ``total cost of $20,000,000''.

SEC. 3123. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, 
New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is 
modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-
        Federal interest to construct a temporary dredged 
        material storage facility to receive dredged material 
        from the project if--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest submits, in 
                writing, a list of potential sites for the 
                temporary storage facility to the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
                of Representatives, the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and 
                the Secretary at least 180 days before the 
                selection of the final site; and
                    (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged 
                material generated in connection with the 
                project suitable for beneficial reuse will be 
                used at sites in the State of New Jersey to the 
                extent that there are sufficient sites 
                available; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of construction of 
        the temporary storage facility for the project.

SEC. 3124. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this 
section, the term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 
miles of navigable canal that comprise the New York State Canal 
System, including the Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and 
Champlain Canals and the historic alignments of these canals, 
including the cities of Albany, Rochester, and Buffalo.''.

SEC. 3125. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED 
                    MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK.

    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the State of New York, the Delaware or Susquehanna 
        River Basin Commission, as appropriate, and local 
        entities, shall develop watershed management plans for 
        the Susquehanna River watershed in New York State and 
        the Upper Delaware River watershed for the purposes of 
        evaluating existing and new flood damage reduction and 
        ecosystem restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed 
        management plans, the Secretary shall use existing 
        studies and plans, as appropriate.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in 
        any eligible critical restoration project in the 
        Susquehanna River or Upper Delaware Rivers in 
        accordance with the watershed management plans 
        developed under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration 
        project shall be eligible for assistance under this 
        section if the project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the 
                watershed management plans developed under 
                subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Susquehanna River 
                or Upper Delaware River watershed in New York, 
                consists of flood damage reduction or ecosystem 
                restoration through--
                            (i) bank stabilization of the 
                        mainstem, tributaries, and streams;
                            (ii) wetland restoration;
                            (iii) soil and water conservation;
                            (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                            (v) restoration of stream 
                        stability;
                            (vi) structural and nonstructural 
                        flood damage reduction measures; or
                            (vii) any other project or activity 
                        the Secretary determines to be 
                        appropriate.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements 
to provide financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, 
or local governments or nonprofit agencies, including 
assistance for the implementation of projects to be carried out 
under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 3126. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, NORTH DAKOTA.

    Section 707(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2699) is amended in the first sentence by 
striking ``$5,000,000'' and all that follows through ``2005'' 
and inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 3127. WAHPETON, NORTH DAKOTA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allotted 
for the project for flood damage reduction, Wahpeton, North 
Dakota, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be $12,000,000.

SEC. 3128. OHIO.

    Section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 381) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as 
        subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the 
        following:
    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
Federal interest for any project carried out under this section 
may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of the 
affected local government.''.

SEC. 3129. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, GIRARD, OHIO.

    Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3758) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary'';
            (2) in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) (as 
        designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection)--
                    (A) by striking ``Repair and 
                rehabilitation'' and all that follows through 
                ``Ohio'' and inserting ``Correction of 
                structural deficiencies of the Lower Girard 
                Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio, and the appurtenant 
                features to meet the dam safety standards of 
                the State of Ohio''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$2,500,000'' and 
                inserting ``$16,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Special Rules.--The project for Lower Girard Lake 
Dam, Girard, Ohio, authorized by subsection (a)(1) is justified 
on the basis of public safety.''.

SEC. 3130. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO.

    In carrying out the project for environmental dredging, 
authorized by section 312(f)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), the Secretary 
is directed to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3131. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the 
Secretary in October 1999 of all costs associated with present 
and future water storage costs at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under 
Arcadia Lake Water Storage Contract Number DACW56-79-C-0072 
shall satisfy the obligations of the city under that contract.

SEC. 3132. ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to participate 
in the ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage 
reduction components of the Arkansas River Corridor Master Plan 
dated October 2005. The Secretary shall coordinate with 
appropriate representatives in the vicinity of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 
including representatives of Tulsa County and surrounding 
communities and the Indian Nations Council of Governments.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 3133. LAKE EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Project Goal.--
            (1) In general.--The goal for operation of Lake 
        Eufaula, Oklahoma, shall be to maximize the use of 
        available storage in a balanced approach that 
        incorporates advice from representatives from all the 
        project purposes to ensure that the full value of the 
        reservoir is realized by the United States.
            (2) Recognition of purpose.--To achieve the goal 
        described in paragraph (1), recreation is recognized as 
        a project purpose at Lake Eufaula, pursuant to section 
        4 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
        Stat. 889).
    (b) Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with the Federal 
        Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), the Secretary 
        shall establish an advisory committee for the Lake 
        Eufaula, Canadian River, Oklahoma project authorized by 
        the first section of the River and Harbor Act of July 
        24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635).
            (2) Purpose.--The purpose of the committee shall be 
        advisory only.
            (3) Duties.--The committee shall provide 
        information and recommendations to the Corps of 
        Engineers regarding the operations of Lake Eufaula for 
        the project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
            (4) Composition.--The Committee shall be composed 
        of members that equally represent the project purposes 
        for Lake Eufaula.
    (c) Reallocation Study.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the appropriation of 
        funds, the Secretary shall perform a reallocation 
        study, at Federal expense, to develop and present 
        recommendations concerning the best value, while 
        minimizing ecological damages, for current and future 
        use of the Lake Eufaula storage capacity for the 
        authorized project purposes of flood control, water 
        supply, hydroelectric power, navigation, fish and 
        wildlife, and recreation.
            (2) Factors for consideration.--The reallocation 
        study shall take into consideration the recommendations 
        of the Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee.
    (d) Pool Management Plan.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, to the extent feasible 
        within available project funds and subject to the 
        completion and approval of the reallocation study under 
        subsection (c), the Tulsa district engineer, taking 
        into consideration recommendations of the Lake Eufaula 
        Advisory Committee, shall develop an interim management 
        plan that accommodates all project purposes for Lake 
        Eufaula.
            (2) Modifications.--A modification of the plan 
        under paragraph (1) shall not cause significant adverse 
        impacts on any existing permit, lease, license, 
        contract, public law, or project purpose, including 
        flood control operation, relating to Lake Eufaula.

SEC. 3134. OKLAHOMA LAKES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Implementation of Program.--Not later than one year 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
implement an innovative program at the lakes located primarily 
in the State of Oklahoma that are a part of an authorized civil 
works project under the administrative jurisdiction of the 
Corps of Engineers for the purpose of demonstrating the 
benefits of enhanced recreation facilities and activities at 
those lakes.
    (b) Requirements.--In implementing the program under 
subsection (a), the Secretary, consistent with authorized 
project purposes, shall--
            (1) pursue strategies that will enhance, to the 
        maximum extent practicable, recreation experiences at 
        the lakes included in the program;
            (2) use creative management strategies that 
        optimize recreational activities; and
            (3) ensure continued public access to recreation 
        areas located on or associated with the civil works 
        project.
    (c) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines for 
the implementation of this section, to be developed in 
coordination with the State of Oklahoma.
    (d) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report 
        describing the results of the program under subsection 
        (a).
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) 
        shall include a description of the projects undertaken 
        under the program, including--
                    (A) an estimate of the change in any 
                related recreational opportunities;
                    (B) a description of any leases entered 
                into, including the parties involved; and
                    (C) the financial conditions that the Corps 
                of Engineers used to justify those leases.
            (3) Availability to public.--The Secretary shall 
        make the report available to the public in electronic 
        and written formats.
    (e) Termination.--The authority provided by this section 
shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3135. OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
$30,000,000 for the purposes set forth in subsection (b).
    (b) Purposes.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
funds appropriated under subsection (a) may be used for the 
purpose of--
            (1) the buyout of properties and permanently 
        relocating residents and businesses in or near Picher, 
        Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas 
        determined by the State of Oklahoma to be at risk of 
        damage caused by land subsidence and remaining 
        properties; and
            (2) providing funding to the State of Oklahoma to 
        buyout properties and permanently relocate residents 
        and businesses of Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, 
        Oklahoma, from areas determined by the State of 
        Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land 
        subsidence and remaining properties.
    (c) Limitation.--The use of funds in accordance with 
subsection (b) shall not be considered to be part of a 
federally assisted program or project for purposes of Public 
Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), consistent with section 
2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455).
    (d) Consistency With State Program.--Any actions taken 
under subsection (b) shall be consistent with the relocation 
program in the State of Oklahoma under 27A O.S. Supp. 2006, 
sections 2201 et seq.
    (e) Consideration of Remedial Action.--The Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency shall consider, without 
delay, a remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 
9601 et seq.) for the Tar Creek, Oklahoma, National Priorities 
List site that includes permanent relocation of residents 
consistent with the program currently being administered by the 
State of Oklahoma. Such relocation shall not be subject to the 
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition 
Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).
    (f) Estimating Costs.--In estimating and comparing the cost 
of a remedial alternative for the Tar Creek Oklahoma, National 
Priorities List site that includes the permanent relocation of 
residents, the Administrator shall not include the cost of 
compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et 
seq.).
    (g) Effect of Certain Remedies.--Inclusion of subsidence 
remedies, such as permanent relocation within any remedial 
action, shall not preempt, alter, or delay the right of any 
sovereign entity, including any State or tribal government, to 
seek remedies, including abatement, for land subsidence and 
subsidence risks under State law.
    (h) Amendment.--Section 111 of Public Law 108-137 (117 
Stat. 1835) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the 
        following: ``Such activities also may include the 
        provision of financial assistance to facilitate the buy 
        out of properties located in areas identified by the 
        State as areas that are or will be at risk of damage 
        caused by land subsidence and associated properties 
        otherwise identified by the State. Any buyout of such 
        properties shall not be considered to be part of a 
        federally assisted program or project for purposes of 
        Public Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), consistent 
        with section 2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455-
        456).''; and
            (2) by striking the first sentence of subsection 
        (d) and inserting the following: ``Non-Federal 
        interests shall be responsible for operating and 
        maintaining any restoration alternatives constructed or 
        carried out pursuant to this section.''.

SEC. 3136. RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS.

    The project for water quality control in the Arkansas and 
Red River Basin, Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, authorized by 
section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) 
and modified by section 1107(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4229) is further modified to 
direct the Secretary to provide operation and maintenance for 
the Red River Chloride Control project, Oklahoma and Texas, at 
Federal expense.

SEC. 3137. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master 
Conservancy District payable to the United States Government in 
the amounts, rates of interest, and payment schedules--
            (1) is set at the amounts, rates of interest, and 
        payment schedules that existed on June 3, 1986, with 
        respect to the project for Waurika Lake, Oklahoma; and
            (2) may not be adjusted, altered, or changed 
        without a specific, separate, and written agreement 
        between the District and the United States.

SEC. 3138. UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 
                    OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and 
ecosystem restoration projects for the upper Willamette River 
watershed from Albany, Oregon, to the headwaters of the 
Willamette River and tributaries.
    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
restoration projects under this section for the Upper 
Willamette River watershed in consultation with the Governor of 
the State of Oregon, the heads of appropriate Indian tribes, 
the Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the 
Bureau of Land Management, the Forest Service, and local 
entities.
    (c) Authorized Activities.--In carrying out ecosystem 
restoration projects under this section, the Secretary shall 
undertake activities necessary to protect, monitor, and restore 
fish and wildlife habitat.
    (d) Priority.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to a project to restore the millrace in 
Eugene, Oregon, and shall include noneconomic benefits 
associated with the historical significance of the millrace and 
associated with preservation and enhancement of resources in 
evaluating the benefits of the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 3139. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND DELAWARE.

    The Secretary may remove debris from the project for 
navigation, Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and 
Delaware, Philadelphia to the Sea.

SEC. 3140. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, 
including construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline 
erosion between .07 and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State 
Route 994 on the east shore of Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3141. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 
                    PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden 
Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
Pennsylvania, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), up 
to $400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for planning and design work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 3142. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified 
to include as a project element the project for flood control 
for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3143. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 
117 Stat. 142) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (g)(1) by striking 
        ``$180,000,000'' and inserting ``$200,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Allegheny, 
        Armstrong, Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, 
        Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, 
        Mifflin, Somerset, Snyder, Washington, and Westmoreland 
        Counties'' and inserting ``Allegheny, Armstrong, 
        Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, 
        Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Somerset, 
        Washington, and Westmoreland Counties''.

SEC. 3144. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming 
Valley, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the 
Secretary shall coordinate with non-Federal interests to review 
opportunities for increased public access.

SEC. 3145. NARRAGANSETT BAY, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary may use amounts in the Environmental 
Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, under section 
2703(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, for the removal of 
abandoned marine camels at any formerly used defense site under 
the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense that is 
undergoing (or is scheduled to undergo) environmental 
remediation under chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code 
(and other provisions of law), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode 
Island, in accordance with the Corps of Engineers 
prioritization process under the Formerly Used Defense Sites 
program.

SEC. 3146. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Membership.--Section 904(b)(1)(B) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended--
            (1) in clause (vii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (ix); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after clause (vii) the following:
                            ``(viii) rural water systems; 
                        and''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 907(a) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2712) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``2005'' and 
inserting ``2010''.

SEC. 3147. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

    (a) Credit for Planning and Design.--The project for 
navigation, Cedar Bayou, Texas, reauthorized by section 
349(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2632), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of planning and design work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and 
operation and maintenance of the project shall be determined in 
accordance with section 101 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
    (c) Project for Navigation.--Section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632) is amended 
by striking ``12 feet deep by 125 feet wide'' and inserting 
``that is 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide''.

SEC. 3148. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Freeport 
Harbor, Texas, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is modified to provide 
that--
            (1) all project costs incurred as a result of the 
        discovery of the sunken vessel COMSTOCK of the Corps of 
        Engineers are a Federal responsibility; and
            (2) the Secretary shall not seek further obligation 
        or responsibility for removal of the vessel COMSTOCK, 
        or costs associated with a delay due to the discovery 
        of the sunken vessel COMSTOCK, from the Port of 
        Freeport.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--This section does not affect the 
authorized cost sharing for the balance of the project 
described in subsection (a).

SEC. 3149. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not take any legal or 
administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp improvement 
before the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the date of any 
transfer of ownership of the improvement occurring after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of 
its officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for any 
injury, loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake Kemp 
improvement, their lessees, or occupants as a result of any 
flooding or inundation of such improvements by the waters of 
the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for such injury, loss, or damage as 
may occur through the operation and maintenance of the Lake 
Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
    (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``Lake Kemp improvement'' means an improvement (including 
dwellings) located within the flowage easement of Lake Kemp, 
Texas, below elevation 1159 feet mean sea level.

SEC. 3150. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, 
Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
            (1) to include as part of the project flood 
        protection works to reroute drainage to Raymondville 
        Drain constructed by the non-Federal interests in 
        Hidalgo County in the vicinity of Edinburg, Texas, if 
        the Secretary determines that such work is feasible;
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary in calculating the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project, to make a 
        determination, within 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, under section 103(m) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability to pay.

SEC. 3151. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage 
reduction, North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, 
authorized by section 556 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is modified to include recreation 
as a project purpose.

SEC. 3152. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is directed to accept from the city of Paris, 
Texas, $3,461,432 as payment in full of monies owed to the 
United States for water supply storage space in Pat Mayse Lake, 
Texas, under contract number DA-34-066-CIVENG-65-1272, 
including accrued interest.

SEC. 3153. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is authorized to purchase fee simple title to 
all properties located within the boundaries, and necessary for 
the operation, of the Proctor Lake project, Texas, authorized 
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1259).

SEC. 3154. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 
Stat. 1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood 
protection on the Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas and 
modified by section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and section 335 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project and the 
cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project.

SEC. 3155. CONNECTICUT RIVER RESTORATION, VERMONT.

    Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), as in effect on August 5, 2005, with 
respect to the study entitled ``Connecticut River Restoration 
Authority'', dated May 23, 2001, a nonprofit entity may act as 
the non-Federal interest for purposes of carrying out the 
activities described in the agreement executed between The 
Nature Conservancy and the Department of the Army on August 5, 
2005.

SEC. 3156. DAM REMEDIATION, VERMONT.

    Section 543 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2673) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;
            (2) in subsection (a)(3) by striking the period at 
        the end and inserting ``; and'';
            (3) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the 
        following:
            ``(4) may carry out measures to restore, protect, 
        and preserve an ecosystem affected by a dam described 
        in subsection (b).''; and
            (4) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the 
        following:
            ``(11) Camp Wapanacki, Hardwick.
            ``(12) Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly.
            ``(13) Curtis Pond, Calais.
            ``(14) Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield.
            ``(15) Burr Pond, Sudbury.
            ``(16) Maidstone Lake, Guildhall.
            ``(17) Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam.
            ``(18) Lake Fairlee.
            ``(19) West Charleston Dam.
            ``(20) White River, Sharon.''.

SEC. 3157. LAKE CHAMPLAIN EURASIAN MILFOIL, WATER CHESTNUT, AND OTHER 
                    NONNATIVE PLANT CONTROL, VERMONT.

    Under authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary may revise the existing 
General Design Memorandum to permit the use of chemical means 
of control, when appropriate, of Eurasian milfoil, water 
chestnuts, and other nonnative plants in the Lake Champlain 
basin, Vermont.

SEC. 3158. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION, VERMONT 
                    AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
States of Vermont and New Hampshire, shall carry out a study 
and develop a strategy for the use of wetland restoration, soil 
and water conservation practices, and nonstructural measures to 
reduce flood damage, improve water quality, and create wildlife 
habitat in the Upper Connecticut River watershed.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study and 
developing the strategy under this section, the Secretary may 
enter into one or more cooperative agreements to provide 
technical assistance to appropriate Federal, State, and local 
agencies and nonprofit organizations with wetland restoration 
experience. Such assistance may include assistance for the 
implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and 
water conservation measures.
    (c) Implementation.--The Secretary shall carry out 
development and implementation of the strategy under this 
section in cooperation with local landowners and local 
government officials.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000, to 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 3159. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, VERMONT 
                    AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) General Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with 
        the Secretary of Agriculture and in consultation with 
        the States of Vermont and New Hampshire and the 
        Connecticut River Joint Commission, shall conduct a 
        study and develop a general management plan for 
        ecosystem restoration of the Upper Connecticut River 
        ecosystem for the purposes of--
                    (A) habitat protection and restoration;
                    (B) streambank stabilization;
                    (C) restoration of stream stability;
                    (D) water quality improvement;
                    (E) aquatic nuisance species control;
                    (F) wetland restoration;
                    (G) fish passage; and
                    (H) natural flow restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the general 
        management plan, the Secretary shall depend heavily on 
        existing plans for the restoration of the Upper 
        Connecticut River.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in 
        any critical restoration project in the Upper 
        Connecticut River basin in accordance with the general 
        management plan developed under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration 
        project shall be eligible for assistance under this 
        section if the project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the 
                general management plan developed under 
                subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Upper Connecticut 
                River and Upper Connecticut River watershed, 
                consists of--
                            (i) bank stabilization of the main 
                        stem, tributaries, and streams;
                            (ii) wetland restoration and 
                        migratory bird habitat restoration;
                            (iii) soil and water conservation;
                            (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                            (v) restoration of stream 
                        stability;
                            (vi) implementation of an 
                        intergovernmental agreement for 
                        coordinating ecosystem restoration, 
                        fish passage installation, streambank 
                        stabilization, wetland restoration, 
                        habitat protection and restoration, or 
                        natural flow restoration;
                            (vii) water quality improvement;
                            (viii) aquatic nuisance species 
                        control;
                            (ix) improvements in fish 
                        migration; and
                            (x) conduct of any other project or 
                        activity determined to be appropriate 
                        by the Secretary.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative agreements 
to provide financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, 
or local governments or nonprofit agencies. Such assistance may 
include assistance for the implementation of projects to be 
carried out under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. Such 
sums shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 3160. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

    Section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2671) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of 
                subparagraph (D);
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as 
                subparagraph (G); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the 
                following:
                    ``(E) river corridor assessment, 
                protection, management, and restoration for the 
                purposes of ecosystem restoration;
                    ``(F) geographic mapping conducted by the 
                Secretary using existing technical capacity to 
                produce a high-resolution, multispectral 
                satellite imagery-based land use and cover data 
                set; or'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)(A)--
                    (A) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and 
                inserting the following:
                            ``(i) In general.--The non-
                        Federal''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Approval of district 
                        engineer.--Approval of credit for 
                        design work of less than $100,000 shall 
                        be determined by the appropriate 
                        district engineer.'';
            (3) in subsection (e)(2)(C) by striking ``up to 50 
        percent of''; and
            (4) in subsection (g) by striking ``$20,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$32,000,000''.

SEC. 3161. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The project for beach erosion control and hurricane 
protection, Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 
authorized by section 101(22) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804) and modified by 
section 338 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Secretary to review 
the project to determine whether any additional Federal 
interest exists with respect to the project, taking into 
consideration conditions and development levels relating to the 
project in existence on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3162. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.

    Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total cost 
of $1,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $300,000.'' and inserting ``at 
a total cost of $3,600,000.''.

SEC. 3163. DUWAMISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, 
Washington, authorized by section 101(b)(26) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2579), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
            (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to 
        provide any portion of the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of the project in the form of in-kind services and 
        materials.

SEC. 3164. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, MCNARY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
                    WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--
Administrative jurisdiction over the land acquired for the 
McNary Lock and Dam project and managed by the United States 
Fish and Wildlife Service under cooperative agreement number 
DACW68-4-00-13 with the Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla 
District, is transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary of 
the Interior.
    (b) Easements.--The transfer of administrative jurisdiction 
under paragraph (1) shall be subject to easements in existence 
as of the date of enactment of this Act on land subject to the 
transfer.
    (c) Rights of Secretary.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph 
        (C), the Secretary shall retain rights described in 
        subparagraph (B) with respect to the land for which 
        administrative jurisdiction is transferred under 
        paragraph (1).
            (2) Rights.--The rights of the Secretary referred 
        to in paragraph (1) are the rights--
                    (A) to flood land described in subsection 
                (a) to the standard project flood elevation;
                    (B) to manipulate the level of the McNary 
                project pool;
                    (C) to access land described in subsection 
                (a) as may be required to install, maintain, 
                and inspect sediment ranges and carry out 
                similar activities;
                    (D) to construct and develop wetland, 
                riparian habitat, or other environmental 
                restoration features authorized by section 1135 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                (33 U.S.C. 2309a) and section 206 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
                2330);
                    (E) to dredge and deposit fill materials; 
                and
                    (F) to carry out management actions for the 
                purpose of reducing the take of juvenile 
                salmonids by avian colonies that inhabit, 
                before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
                this Act, any island included in the land 
                described in subsection (a).
            (3) Coordination.--Before exercising a right 
        described in any of subparagraphs (C) through (F) of 
        paragraph (2), the Secretary shall coordinate the 
        exercise with the Director of the United States Fish 
        and Wildlife Service.
    (d) Management.--
            (1) In general.--The land described in subsection 
        (a) shall be managed by the Secretary of the Interior 
        as part of the McNary National Wildlife Refuge.
            (2) Cummins property.--
                    (A) Retention of credits.--Habitat unit 
                credits described in the memorandum entitled 
                ``Design Memorandum No. 6, LOWER SNAKE RIVER 
                FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, Wildlife 
                Compensation and Fishing Access Site Selection, 
                Letter Supplement No. 15, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
                FOR THE WALLULA HMU'' provided for the Lower 
                Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan 
                through development of the parcel of land 
                formerly known as the ``Cummins property'' 
                shall be retained by the Secretary despite any 
                changes in management of the parcel on or after 
                the date of enactment of this Act.
                    (B) Site development plan.--The Director 
                shall obtain prior approval of the Washington 
                State department of fish and wildlife for any 
                change to the previously approved site 
                development plan for the parcel of land 
                formerly known as the ``Cummins property''.
            (3) Madame dorian recreation area.--The Director 
        shall continue operation of the Madame Dorian 
        Recreation Area for public use and boater access.
    (e) Administrative Costs.--The Director shall be 
responsible for all survey, environmental compliance, and other 
administrative costs required to implement the transfer of 
administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a).

SEC. 3165. SNAKE RIVER PROJECT, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The fish and wildlife compensation plan 
for the Lower Snake River, Washington and Idaho, as authorized 
by section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 
(90 Stat. 2921), is amended to authorize the Secretary to 
conduct studies and implement aquatic and riparian ecosystem 
restorations and improvements specifically for fisheries and 
wildlife.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 3166. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Yakima 
River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington, being carried out under 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.

SEC. 3167. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4810, 110 Stat. 3726, 113 Stat. 312) is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``(ff) Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.--
            ``(1) In general.--The project for flood control, 
        Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia, 
        authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1938 (52 Stat. 1217) is modified to direct the 
        Secretary to implement Plan C/G, as defined in the 
        Evaluation Report of the District Engineer dated 
        December 1996, to prohibit the release of drift and 
        debris into waters downstream of the project (other 
        than organic matter necessary to maintain and enhance 
        the biological resources of such waters and such 
        nonobtrusive items of debris as may not be economically 
        feasible to prevent being released through such 
        project), including measures to prevent the 
        accumulation of drift and debris at the project, the 
        collection and removal of drift and debris on the 
        segment of the New River upstream of the project, and 
        the removal (through use of temporary or permanent 
        systems) and disposal of accumulated drift and debris 
        at Bluestone Dam.
            ``(2) Cooperative agreement.--In carrying out the 
        downstream cleanup under the plan referred to in 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary may enter into a 
        cooperative agreement with the West Virginia department 
        of environmental protection for the department to carry 
        out the cleanup, including contracting and procurement 
        services, contract administration and management, 
        transportation and disposal of collected materials, and 
        disposal fees.
            ``(3) Initial cleanup.--The Secretary may provide 
        the West Virginia department of environmental 
        protection up to $150,000 from funds previously 
        appropriated for this purpose for the Federal share of 
        the costs of the initial cleanup under the plan.''.

SEC. 3168. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking 
``$47,000,000'' and inserting ``$99,000,000''.

SEC. 3169. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 30(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988 (102 Stat. 4030; 114 Stat. 2678) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
preservation and restoration of the structure known as the 
`Jenkins House' and the reconstruction of associated buildings 
and landscape features of such structure located within the 
Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp in accordance with the standards of 
the Department of the Interior for the treatment of historic 
properties. Amounts made available for expenditure for the 
project authorized by section 301(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110) shall be available for 
the purposes of this subsection.''.

SEC. 3170. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control at Milton, West Virginia, 
authorized by section 580 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790) and modified by section 340 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2612), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the draft report of the Corps 
of Engineers dated May 2004, at an estimated total cost of 
$57,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,825,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,275,000.

SEC. 3171. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The McDowell County nonstructural component of the project 
for flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and 
Cumberland Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
protection, throughout McDowell County, West Virginia, from the 
reoccurrence of the greater of--
            (1) the April 1977 flood;
            (2) the July 2001 flood;
            (3) the May 2002 flood; or
            (4) the 100-year frequency event.

SEC. 3172. PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the ecosystem 
restoration, recreation, and flood control components of the 
report of the Corps of Engineers, entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna 
Riverfront Park Feasibility Study'', dated June 1998, as 
amended by the limited reevaluation report of the Corps of 
Engineers, dated March 2004, at a total cost of $12,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $6,000,000, and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $6,000,000.

SEC. 3173. GREEN BAY HARBOR, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN.

    The portion of the inner harbor of the Federal navigation 
channel of the Green Bay Harbor project, authorized by the 
first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
purposes'', approved July 5, 1884 (23 Stat. 136), from Station 
190+00 to Station 378+00 is authorized to a width of 75 feet 
and a depth of 6 feet.

SEC. 3174. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, 
authorized by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 
Stat. 58), is modified to direct the Secretary to deepen the 
upstream reach of the navigation channel from 12 feet to 18 
feet, at a total cost of $405,000.

SEC. 3175. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

    Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
(102 Stat. 4027) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting 
                ``1278.42'';
                    (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting 
                ``1221.31''; and
                    (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting 
                ``1235.30''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water levels 
established in subsection (a) in accordance with water control 
regulation manuals (or revisions thereto) developed by the 
Secretary, after consultation with the Governor of Minnesota 
and affected tribal governments, landowners, and commercial and 
recreational users. The water control regulation manuals (and 
any revisions thereto) shall be effective when the Secretary 
transmits them to Congress. The Secretary shall report to 
Congress at least 14 days before operating any such headwaters 
reservoir below the minimum or above the maximum water level 
limits specified in subsection (a); except that notification is 
not required for operations necessary to prevent the loss of 
life or to ensure the safety of the dam or if the drawdown of 
lake levels is in anticipation of flood control operations.''.

SEC. 3176. UPPER BASIN OF MISSOURI RIVER.

    (a) Use of Funds.--Notwithstanding the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103), 
funds made available for recovery or mitigation activities in 
the lower basin of the Missouri River may be used for recovery 
or mitigation activities in the upper basin of the Missouri 
River, including the States of Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, 
and South Dakota.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The matter under the heading 
``Missouri River Mitigation, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and 
Nebraska'' of section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143), as modified by section 334 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 306), is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``The Secretary may 
carry out any recovery or mitigation activities in the upper 
basin of the Missouri River, including the States of Montana, 
Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota, using funds made 
available under this paragraph in accordance with the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and 
consistent with the project purposes of the Missouri River 
Mainstem System as authorized by section 10 of the Flood 
Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 897).''.

SEC. 3177. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
                    PROGRAM.

    Section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended 
by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, 
including research on water quality issues affecting the 
Mississippi River (including elevated nutrient levels) and the 
development of remediation strategies''.

SEC. 3178. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM NEW 
                    TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation System 
Defined.--In this section, the term ``Upper Ohio River and 
Tributaries navigation system'' means the Allegheny, Kanawha, 
Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers.
    (b) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a 
        pilot program to evaluate new technologies applicable 
        to the Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation 
        system.
            (2) Inclusions.--The program may include the 
        design, construction, or implementation of innovative 
        technologies and solutions for the Upper Ohio River and 
        Tributaries navigation system, including projects for--
                    (A) improved navigation;
                    (B) environmental stewardship;
                    (C) increased navigation reliability; and
                    (D) reduced navigation costs.
            (3) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall 
        be--
                    (A) to increase the reliability and 
                availability of federally owned and federally 
                operated navigation facilities;
                    (B) to decrease system operational risks; 
                and
                    (C) to improve--
                            (i) vessel traffic management;
                            (ii) access; and
                            (iii) Federal asset management.
    (c) Federal Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is federally owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into 
        local cooperation agreements with non-Federal interests 
        to provide for the design, construction, installation, 
        and operation of the projects to be carried out under 
        the program.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall include the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a navigation improvement project, 
                including appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Total project costs under each 
        local cooperation agreement shall be cost-shared in 
        accordance with the formula relating to the applicable 
        original construction project.
            (4) Expenditures.--
                    (A) In general.--Expenditures under the 
                program may include, for establishment at 
                federally owned property, such as locks, dams, 
                and bridges--
                            (i) transmitters;
                            (ii) responders;
                            (iii) hardware;
                            (iv) software; and
                            (v) wireless networks.
                    (B) Exclusions.--Transmitters, responders, 
                hardware, software, and wireless networks and 
                other equipment installed on privately owned 
                vessels or equipment shall not be eligible 
                under the program.
    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the pilot program carried out under this section, together with 
recommendations concerning whether the program or any component 
of the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000. Such 
sums shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 3179. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), 
the following projects shall remain authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary:
            (1) The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep 
        Water Ship Channel, California, authorized by section 
        202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4092).
            (2) The project for flood control, Agana River, 
        Guam, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
            (3) The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor 
        and Channels, Maryland and Virginia, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 
        Stat. 1818).
            (4) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731); except that the 
        authorized depth of that portion of the project 
        extending riverward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. 
        Memorial Bridge, Fall River and Somerset, 
        Massachusetts, shall not exceed 35 feet.
            (5) The project for flood control, Ecorse Creek, 
        Wayne County, Michigan, authorized by section 
        101(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1990 (104 Stat. 4607).
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) 
shall not be authorized for construction after the last day of 
the 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act, unless, during such period, funds have been obligated for 
the construction (including planning and design) of the 
project.

SEC. 3180. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects may be carried out by the 
Secretary and no construction on any such project may be 
initiated until the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible:
            (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and 
        wisconsin.--The project for navigation, Menominee 
        Harbor and River, Michigan and Wisconsin, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 
        Stat. 482) and deauthorized on April 15, 2002, in 
        accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        579a(b)(2)).
            (2) Hearding island inlet, duluth harbor, 
        minnesota.--The project for dredging, Hearding Island 
        Inlet, Duluth Harbor, Minnesota, authorized by section 
        22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
        Stat. 4027).
            (3) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of 
        the project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, 
        Wisconsin, authorized by the first section of the River 
        and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 Stat. 58), 
        consisting of the channel in the south part of the 
        outer harbor, deauthorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176).

SEC. 3181. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized 
after the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of 
        the project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the 
        River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), 
        consisting of an 18-foot channel in Yellow Mill River 
        and described as follows: Beginning at a point along 
        the eastern limit of the existing project, N123,649.75, 
        E481,920.54, thence running northwesterly about 52.64 
        feet to a point N123,683.03, E481,879.75, thence 
        running northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet to a point 
        N125,030.08, E482,394.96, thence running northeasterly 
        about 139.52 feet to a point along the eastern limit of 
        the existing channel, N125,133.87, E482,488.19, thence 
        running southwesterly about 1,588.98 feet to the point 
        of origin.
            (2) Mystic river, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Mystic River, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
        Appropriations Act of September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 436) 
        consisting of a 12-foot-deep channel, approximately 
        7,554 square feet in area, starting at a point 
        N193,086.51, E815,092.78, thence running north 59 
        degrees 21 minutes 46.63 seconds west about 138.05 feet 
        to a point N193,156.86, E814,974.00, thence running 
        north 51 degrees 04 minutes 39.00 seconds west about 
        166.57 feet to a point N193,261.51, E814,844.41, thence 
        running north 43 degrees 01 minutes 34.90 seconds west 
        about 86.23 feet to a point N193,324.55, E814,785.57, 
        thence running north 06 degrees 42 minutes 03.86 
        seconds west about 156.57 feet to a point N193,480.05, 
        E814,767.30, thence running south 21 degrees 21 minutes 
        17.94 seconds east about 231.42 feet to a point 
        N193,264.52, E814,851.57, thence running south 53 
        degrees 34 minutes 23.28 seconds east about 299.78 feet 
        to the point of origin.
            (3) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--
                    (A) In general.--The portions of a 10-foot 
                channel of the project for navigation, Norwalk 
                Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
                section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 
                1276) and described in subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Description of portions.--The portions 
                of the channel referred to in subparagraph (A) 
                are as follows:
                            (i) Rectangular portion.--An 
                        approximately rectangular-shaped 
                        section along the northwesterly 
                        terminus of the channel. The section is 
                        35-feet wide and about 460-feet long 
                        and is further described as commencing 
                        at a point N104,165.85, E417,662.71, 
                        thence running south 24 degrees 06 
                        minutes 55 seconds east 395.00 feet to 
                        a point N103,805.32, E417,824.10, 
                        thence running south 00 degrees 38 
                        minutes 06 seconds east 87.84 feet to a 
                        point N103,717.49, E417,825.07, thence 
                        running north 24 degrees 06 minutes 55 
                        seconds west 480.00 feet, to a point 
                        N104,155.59, E417,628.96, thence 
                        running north 73 degrees 05 minutes 25 
                        seconds east 35.28 feet to the point of 
                        origin.
                            (ii) Parallelogram-shaped 
                        portion.--An area having the 
                        approximate shape of a parallelogram 
                        along the northeasterly portion of the 
                        channel, southeast of the area 
                        described in clause (i), approximately 
                        20 feet wide and 260 feet long, and 
                        further described as commencing at a 
                        point N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence 
                        running south 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 
                        seconds east 133.40 feet to a point 
                        N103,743.76, E417,922.89, thence 
                        running south 24 degrees 07 minutes 04 
                        seconds east 127.75 feet to a point 
                        N103,627.16, E417,975.09, thence 
                        running north 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 
                        seconds west 190.00 feet to a point 
                        N103,786.28, E417,871.26, thence 
                        running north 17 degrees 05 minutes 15 
                        seconds west 72.39 feet to the point of 
                        origin.
                    (C) Exclusion.--Notwithstanding any other 
                provision of this paragraph, the Secretary 
                shall realign the 10-foot channel potion of the 
                project referred to in subparagraph (A) to 
                include, immediately north of the area 
                described in subparagraph (B)(ii), a triangular 
                section described as commencing at a point 
                N103,968.35, E417,815.29, thence running south 
                17 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds east 118.09 
                feet to a point N103,855.48, E417,849.99, 
                thence running north 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 
                seconds west 36.76 feet to a point N103,886.27, 
                E417,829.90, thence running north 10 degrees 05 
                minutes 26 seconds west 83.37 feet to the point 
                of origin.
            (4) Rockland harbor, maine.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, 
        authorized by the Act of June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202), 
        consisting of a 14-foot channel located in Lermond Cove 
        and beginning at a point with coordinates N99,977.37, 
        E340,290.02, thence running easterly about 200.00 feet 
        to a point with coordinates N99,978.49, E340,490.02, 
        thence running northerly about 138.00 feet to a point 
        with coordinates N100,116.49, E340,289.25, thence 
        running westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with 
        coordinates N100,115.37, E340,289.25, thence running 
        southerly about 138.00 feet to the point of origin.
            (5) Rockport harbor, maine.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project 
                for navigation, Rockport Harbor, Maine, 
                authorized by the first section of the Act of 
                August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 400), located within 
                the 12-foot anchorage described in subparagraph 
                (B).
                    (B) Description of anchorage.--The 
                anchorage referred to in subparagraph (A) is 
                more particularly described as--
                            (i) beginning at the westernmost 
                        point of the anchorage at N128800.00, 
                        E349311.00;
                            (ii) thence running north 12 
                        degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 seconds east 
                        127.08 feet to a point N128923.88, 
                        E349339.32;
                            (iii) thence running north 17 
                        degrees, 40 minutes, 13.0 seconds east 
                        338.61 feet to a point N129246.51, 
                        E349442.10;
                            (iv) thence running south 89 
                        degrees, 21 minutes, 21.0 seconds east 
                        45.36 feet to a point N129246.00, 
                        E349487.46;
                            (v) thence running south 44 
                        degrees, 13 minutes, 32.6 seconds east 
                        18.85 feet to a point N129232.49, 
                        E349500.61;
                            (vi) thence running south 17 
                        degrees, 40 minutes 13.0 seconds west 
                        340.50 feet to a point N128908.06, 
                        E349397.25;
                            (vii) thence running south 12 
                        degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 seconds west 
                        235.41 feet to a point at N128678.57, 
                        E349344.79; and
                            (viii) thence running north 15 
                        degrees, 32 minutes, 59.3 seconds west 
                        126.04 feet to the point of origin.
            (6) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of 
        the project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172), beginning at a 
        point along the eastern side of the inner harbor 
        N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 25 
        degrees 48 minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to a 
        point N200,559.20, E845,377.76, thence running north 22 
        degrees 7 minutes 52.4 seconds east 596.82 feet to a 
        point N201,112.15, E845,602.60, thence running north 60 
        degrees 1 minute 0.3 seconds east 83.18 feet to a point 
        N201,153.72, E845,674.65, thence running south 24 
        degrees 56 minutes 43.4 seconds west 665.01 feet to a 
        point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence running south 32 
        degrees 25 minutes 29.0 seconds west 160.76 feet to the 
        point of origin.
            (7) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion 
        of the project for navigation, Island End River, 
        Massachusetts, carried out under section 107 of the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), described 
        as follows: Beginning at a point along the eastern 
        limit of the existing project, N507,348.98, 
        E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 feet to 
        a point N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running 
        northeast about 324 feet to a point N507,590.51, 
        E721,433.17, thence running northeast about 345 feet to 
        a point along the northern limit of the existing 
        project, N507,927.29, E721,510.29, thence running 
        southeast about 25 feet to a point N507,921.71, 
        E721,534.66, thence running southwest about 354 feet to 
        a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence running 
        southwest about 357 feet to the point of origin.
            (8) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion 
        of the project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, 
        Washington, authorized by the first section of the 
        River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 
        (32 Stat. 347), consisting of the last 1,000 linear 
        feet of the inner portion of the waterway beginning at 
        station 70+00 and ending at station 80+00.
            (9) Aunt lydia's cove, massachusetts.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project 
                for navigation, Aunt Lydia's Cove, 
                Massachusetts, constructed under section 107 of 
                the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
                577), consisting of the 8-foot deep anchorage 
                in the cove described in subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Description of portion.--The portion of 
                the project described in subparagraph (A) is 
                more particularly described as the portion 
                beginning at a point along the southern limit 
                of the existing project, N254,332.00, 
                E1,023,103.96, thence running northwesterly 
                about 761.60 feet to a point along the western 
                limit of the existing project N255,076.84, 
                E1,022,945.07, thence running southwesterly 
                about 38.11 feet to a point N255,038.99, 
                E1,022,940.60, thence running southeasterly 
                about 267.07 feet to a point N254,772.00, 
                E1,022,947.00, thence running southeasterly 
                about 462.41 feet to a point N254,320.06, 
                E1,023,044.84, thence running northeasterly 
                about 60.31 feet to the point of origin.
            (10) Whatcom creek waterway, bellingham, 
        washington.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
        Whatcom Creek Waterway, Bellingham, Washington, 
        authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910 
        (36 Stat. 664), and section 101 of the River and Harbor 
        Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299), consisting of the last 
        2,900 linear feet of the inner portion of the waterway 
        and beginning at station 29+00 to station 0+00.
            (11) Oconto harbor, wisconsin.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project 
                for navigation, Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin, 
                authorized by the Act of August 2, 1882 (22 
                Stat. 196), and the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 
                Stat. 664) (commonly known as the ``River and 
                Harbor Act of 1910''), consisting of a 15-foot-
                deep turning basin in the Oconto River, as 
                described in subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Project description.--The project 
                referred to in subparagraph (B) is more 
                particularly described as--
                            (i) beginning at a point along the 
                        western limit of the existing project, 
                        N394,086.71, E2,530,202.71;
                            (ii) thence northeasterly about 
                        619.93 feet to a point N394,459.10, 
                        E2,530,698.33;
                            (iii) thence southeasterly about 
                        186.06 feet to a point N394,299.20, 
                        E2,530,793.47;
                            (iv) thence southwesterly about 
                        355.07 feet to a point N393,967.13, 
                        E2,530,667.76;
                            (v) thence southwesterly about 
                        304.10 feet to a point N393,826.90, 
                        E2,530,397.92; and
                            (vi) thence northwesterly about 
                        324.97 feet to the point of origin.
    (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.--The 
portion of the project for navigation, New London Harbor, 
Connecticut, authorized by the River and Harbor Appropriations 
Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 333), that consists of a 23-foot 
waterfront channel and that is further described as beginning 
at a point along the western limit of the existing project, 
N188, 802.75, E779, 462.81, thence running northeasterly about 
1,373.88 feet to a point N189, 554.87, E780, 612.53, thence 
running southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N189, 
319.88, E780, 983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 
feet to a point N188, 864.63, E780, 288.08, thence running 
southeasterly about 567.39 feet to a point N188, 301.88, E780, 
360.49, thence running northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the 
point of origin, is redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut.--The project 
for navigation, Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut, 
authorized by section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 
1829, and by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), and section 364 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3733-3734), is 
modified to redesignate a portion of the 9-foot-deep channel to 
an anchorage area, approximately 900 feet in length and 90,000 
square feet in area, and lying generally north of a line with 
points at coordinates N108,043.45, E452,252.04 and N107,938.74, 
E452,265.74.
    (d) Saco River, Maine.--The portion of the project for 
navigation, Saco River, Maine, constructed under section 107 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and described 
as a 6-foot deep, 10-acre maneuvering basin located at the head 
of navigation, is redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (e) Union River, Maine.--The project for navigation, Union 
River, Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as an 
anchorage area that portion of the project consisting of a 6-
foot turning basin and lying northerly of a line commencing at 
a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, thence running north 61 
degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 132.34 feet to a 
point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.
    (f) Mystic River, Massachusetts.--The portion of the 
project for navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, authorized 
by the first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act 
of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 96), between a line starting at a 
point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 and ending at a point 
N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a point 
N514,595.15, E707,746.15 and ending at a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38 shall be relocated and reduced from a 100-foot wide 
channel to a 50-foot wide channel after the date of enactment 
of this Act described as follows: Beginning at a point 
N515,721.28, E707,069.85, thence running southeasterly about 
840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, E707,601.27, thence running 
southeasterly about 177.54 feet to a point N514,904.84, 
E707,665.98, thence running southeasterly about 319.90 feet to 
a point with coordinates N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence 
running northwesterly about 163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38, thence running northwesterly about 161.58 feet to 
a point N514.889.47, E707,618.30, thence running northwesterly 
about 166.61 feet to a point N515.044.62, E707,557.58, thence 
running northwesterly about 825.31 feet to a point N515,683.77, 
E707,035.45, thence running northeasterly about 50.90 feet 
returning to a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85.
    (g) Rivercenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.--Section 38(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 59j-
1; 102 Stat. 4038) is amended by striking ``subsection (a) of 
this section'' and inserting ``subsection (a) (except 30 years 
from such date of enactment, in the case of the area or any 
part thereof described in subsection (a)(5))''.
    (h) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects 
are not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, 
except with respect to any portion of such a project which 
portion has been completed before such date or is under 
construction on such date:
            (1) The project for flood protection on Atascadero 
        Creek and its tributaries of Goleta, California, 
        authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (84 Stat. 1826).
            (2) The project for the construction of bridge 
        fenders for the Summit and St. Georges Bridge for the 
        Inland Waterway of the Delaware River to the C & D 
        Canal of the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, 
        authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 
        Stat. 1249).
            (3) The project for flood control, central and 
        southern Florida, Shingle Creek basin, Florida, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1962 (76 Stat. 1182).
            (4) The project for flood control, Brevoort, 
        Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control 
        Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1587).
            (5) The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, 
        Greenfield Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of 
        the Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 649).
            (6) The project for flood damage reduction, Lake 
        George, Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 
        602(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (100 Stat. 4148).
            (7) The project for navigation at the Muscatine 
        Harbor on the Mississippi River at Muscatine, Iowa, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
        of 1950 (64 Stat. 166).
            (8) The project for flood control and water supply, 
        Eagle Creek Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1188).
            (9) The project for flood control, Hazard, 
        Kentucky, authorized by section 3(a)(7) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1988 (100 Stat. 4014) and 
        section 108 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1990 (104 Stat. 4621).
            (10) The project for flood control, western 
        Kentucky tributaries, Kentucky, authorized by section 
        204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1076) 
        and modified by section 210 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (84 Stat. 1829).
            (11) The project for flood damage reduction, 
        Tensas-Cocodrie area, Louisiana, authorized by section 
        3 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 
        643).
            (12) The uncompleted portions of the project for 
        navigation improvement for Bayou LaFourche and 
        LaFourche Jump, Louisiana, authorized by the Act of 
        August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1033), and the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481).
            (13) The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides 
        and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, 
        authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (84 Stat. 1825).
            (14) The project for erosion protection and 
        recreation, Fort Livingston, Grande Terre Island, 
        Louisiana, authorized by the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 
        U.S.C. 426e et seq).
            (15) The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, 
        Maine, authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 
        1945 (59 Stat. 12).
            (16) The project for navigation, Tenants Harbor, 
        Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
        March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1275).
            (17) The project for navigation, New York Harbor 
        and adjacent channels, Claremont Terminal, Jersey City, 
        New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098).
            (18) The project for navigation, Olcott Harbor, 
        Lake Ontario, New York, authorized by section 601(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4143).
            (19) The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, 
        Buffalo, New York, authorized by section 110 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
        4817).
            (20) The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers 
        Memorial, Hammond, Oregon, authorized by title I of the 
        Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1991 
        (104 Stat. 2078).
            (21) The project for navigation, Narragansett Town 
        Beach, Narragansett, Rhode Island, authorized by 
        section 361 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1992 (106 Stat. 4861).
            (22) The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset 
        Point-Davisville, Rhode Island, authorized by section 
        571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
        Stat. 3788).
            (23) The structural portion of the project for 
        flood control, Cypress Creek, Texas, authorized by 
        section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
            (24) The project for flood protection, East Fork 
        Channel Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the 
        Trinity River, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1185).
            (25) The project for flood control, Falfurrias, 
        Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(14) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
            (26) The project for flood control, Pecan Bayou 
        Lake, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 742).
            (27) The project for navigation improvements 
        affecting Lake of the Pines, Texas, for the portion of 
        the Red River below Fulton, Arkansas, authorized by the 
        Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 103) and modified by the 
        Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635), the Act of May 17, 
        1950 (64 Stat. 163), and the River and Harbor Act of 
        1968 (82 Stat. 731).
            (28) The project for navigation, Tennessee Colony 
        Lake, Trinity River, Texas, authorized by section 204 
        of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091).
            (29) The project for streambank erosion, Kanawha 
        River, Charleston, West Virginia, authorized by section 
        603(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (100 Stat. 4153).

SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the 
        State of Arkansas, without monetary consideration and 
        subject to paragraph (2), all right, title, and 
        interest in and to real property within the State 
        acquired by the Federal Government as mitigation land 
        for the project for flood control, St. Francis Basin, 
        Arkansas and Missouri Project, authorized by the Flood 
        Control Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et seq.).
            (2) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) In general.--The conveyance by the 
                United States under this subsection shall be 
                subject to--
                            (i) the condition that the State of 
                        Arkansas agree to operate, maintain, 
                        and manage the real property for fish 
                        and wildlife, recreation, and 
                        environmental purposes at no cost or 
                        expense to the United States; and
                            (ii) such other terms and 
                        conditions as the Secretary determines 
                        to be in the interest of the United 
                        States.
                    (B) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines 
                that the real property conveyed under paragraph 
                (1) ceases to be held in public ownership or 
                the State ceases to operate, maintain, and 
                manage the real property in accordance with 
                this subsection, all right, title, and interest 
                in and to the property shall revert to the 
                United States, at the option of the Secretary.
            (3) Mitigation.--Nothing in this subsection 
        extinguishes the responsibility of the Federal 
        Government or the non-Federal interest for the project 
        referred to in paragraph (1) from the obligation to 
        implement mitigation for such project that existed on 
        the day prior to the transfer authorized by this 
        subsection.
    (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, California.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey, by 
        separate quitclaim deeds, as soon as the conveyance of 
        each individual portion is practicable, the title of 
        the United States in and to all or portions of the 
        approximately 86 acres of upland, tideland, and 
        submerged land, commonly referred to as the ``Oakland 
        Inner Harbor Tidal Canal'', California (referred to in 
        this section as the ``Canal Property''), as follows:
                    (A) To the city of Oakland, without 
                consideration, the title of the United States 
                in and to all or portions of that part of the 
                Canal Property that are located within the 
                boundaries of the City of Oakland.
                    (B) To the city of Alameda, or to a public 
                entity created by or designated by the city of 
                Alameda that is eligible to hold title to real 
                property, without consideration, the title of 
                the United States in and to all or portions of 
                that part of the Canal Property that are 
                located within the boundaries of the city of 
                Alameda.
                    (C) To the owners of lands adjacent to the 
                Canal Property, or to a public entity created 
                by or designated by one or more of the adjacent 
                land owners that are eligible to hold title to 
                real property, at fair market value, the title 
                of the United States in and to all or portions 
                of that part of the Canal Property that are 
                located within the boundaries of the city in 
                which the adjacent land is located.
            (2) Requirement.--The Secretary may reserve and 
        retain from any conveyance under this subsection a 
        right-of-way or other rights as the Secretary 
        determines to be necessary for the operation and 
        maintenance of the authorized Federal channel in the 
        Canal Property.
            (3) Annual reports.--Until the date on which each 
        conveyance described in paragraph (1) is complete, the 
        Secretary shall submit, by not later than November 30 
        of each year, to the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate and Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives an annual report that describes the 
        efforts of the Secretary to complete that conveyance 
        during the preceding fiscal year.
            (4) Form.--A conveyance made under this subsection 
        may be, in whole or in part, in the form of an 
        easement.
            (5) Right of first refusal.--For any property on 
        which an easement is granted under this subsection, 
        should the Secretary seek to dispose of the property, 
        the holder of the easement shall have the right of 
        first refusal to the property without cost or 
        consideration.
            (6) Repeal.--Section 205 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633; 110 Stat. 
        3748) is repealed.
    (c) Milford, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by 
        quitclaim deed without consideration to the Geary 
        County Fire Department, Milford, Kansas, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to real 
        property consisting of approximately 7.4 acres located 
        in Geary County, Kansas, for construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of a fire station.
            (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that 
        the real property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases 
        to be held in public ownership or ceases to be operated 
        and maintained as a fire station, all right, title, and 
        interest in and to the property shall revert to the 
        United States, at the option of the United States.
    (d) Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting 
        through the Tulsa District of the Corps of Engineers, 
        shall transfer to Pleasant Township, Coffey County, 
        Kansas, for use as the New Strawn Cemetery, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        land described in paragraph (3).
            (2) Reversion.--If the land transferred under this 
        subsection ceases at any time to be used as a nonprofit 
        cemetery or for another public purpose, the land shall 
        revert to the United States.
            (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under 
        this subsection is a tract of land near John Redmond 
        Lake, Kansas, containing approximately 3 acres and 
        lying adjacent to the west line of the Strawn Cemetery 
        located in the SE corner of the NE\1/4\ of section 32, 
        township 20 south, range 14 east, Coffey County, 
        Kansas.
    (e) Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    (A) Federal land.--The term ``Federal 
                land'' means the 2 parcels of Corps of 
                Engineers land totaling approximately 42 acres, 
                located on Buffalo Island in Pike County, 
                Missouri, and consisting of Government Tract 
                Numbers MIS-7 and a portion of FM-46.
                    (B) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-
                Federal land'' means the approximately 42 acres 
                of land, subject to any existing flowage 
                easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, 
                upstream and northwest, about 200 feet from 
                Drake Island (also known as Grimes Island).
            (2) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraph (3), on 
        conveyance by S.S.S., Inc., to the United States of all 
        right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal 
        land, the Secretary shall convey to S.S.S., Inc., all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and 
        to the Federal land.
            (3) Conditions.--
                    (A) Deeds.--
                            (i) Non-federal land.--The 
                        conveyance of the non-Federal land to 
                        the Secretary shall be by a warranty 
                        deed acceptable to the Secretary.
                            (ii) Federal land.--The conveyance 
                        of the Federal land to S.S.S., Inc., 
                        shall be--
                                    (I) by quitclaim deed; and
                                    (II) subject to any 
                                reservations, terms, and 
                                conditions that the Secretary 
                                determines to be necessary to 
                                allow the United States to 
                                operate and maintain the 
                                Mississippi River 9-Foot 
                                Navigation Project.
                            (iii) Legal descriptions.--The 
                        Secretary shall provide a legal 
                        description of the Federal land, and 
                        S.S.S., Inc., shall provide a legal 
                        description of the non-Federal land, 
                        for inclusion in the deeds referred to 
                        in clauses (i) and (ii).
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary may 
                        require the removal of, or S.S.S., 
                        Inc., may voluntarily remove, any 
                        improvements to the non-Federal land 
                        before the completion of the exchange 
                        or as a condition of the exchange.
                            (ii) No liability.--If S.S.S., 
                        Inc., removes any improvements to the 
                        non-Federal land under clause (i)--
                                    (I) S.S.S., Inc., shall 
                                have no claim against the 
                                United States relating to the 
                                removal; and
                                    (II) the United States 
                                shall not incur or be liable 
                                for any cost associated with 
                                the removal or relocation of 
                                the improvements.
                    (C) Administrative costs.--The Secretary 
                shall require S.S.S., Inc. to pay reasonable 
                administrative costs associated with the 
                exchange.
                    (D) Cash equalization payment.--If the 
                appraised fair market value, as determined by 
                the Secretary, of the Federal land exceeds the 
                appraised fair market value, as determined by 
                the Secretary, of the non-Federal land, S.S.S., 
                Inc., shall make a cash equalization payment to 
                the United States.
                    (E) Deadline.--The land exchange under 
                subparagraph (B) shall be completed not later 
                than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
                this Act.
    (f) Union Lake, Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall offer to 
        convey to the State of Missouri, before June 30, 2007, 
        all right, title, and interest in and to approximately 
        205.50 acres of land described in paragraph (2) 
        purchased for the Union Lake Project that was 
        deauthorized as of January 1, 1990 (55 Fed. Reg. 
        40906), in accordance with section 1001(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)).
            (2) Land description.--The land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) is described as follows:
                    (A) Tract 500.--A tract of land situated in 
                Franklin County, Missouri, being part of the 
                SW\1/4\ of section 7, and the NW\1/4\ of the 
                SW\1/4\ of section 8, township 42 north, range 
                2 west of the fifth principal meridian, 
                consisting of approximately 112.50 acres.
                    (B) Tract 605.--A tract of land situated in 
                Franklin County, Missouri, being part of the 
                N\1/2\ of the NE, and part of the SE of the NE 
                of section 18, township 42 north, range 2 west 
                of the fifth principal meridian, consisting of 
                approximately 93.00 acres.
            (3) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the State of 
        Missouri of the offer by the Secretary under paragraph 
        (1), the land described in paragraph (2) shall 
        immediately be conveyed, in its current condition, by 
        Secretary to the State of Missouri.
    (g) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting 
        ``the Boardman Park and Recreation District, 
        Boardman,''; and
            (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the 
        city of Boardman''.
    (h) Lookout Point Project, Lowell, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey without 
        consideration to Lowell School District, by quitclaim 
        deed, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to land and buildings thereon, known as 
        Tract A-82, located in Lowell, Oregon, and described in 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Description of property.--The parcel of land 
        authorized to be conveyed under paragraph (1) is as 
        follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the 
        west line of Pioneer Street with the westerly extension 
        of the north line of Summit Street, in Meadows Addition 
        to Lowell, as platted and recorded at page 56 of Volume 
        4, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence north on the 
        west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 176.0 feet to 
        the true point of beginning of this description; thence 
        north on the west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 
        170.0 feet; thence west at right angles to the west 
        line of Pioneer Street a distance of 250.0 feet; thence 
        south and parallel to the west line of Pioneer Street a 
        distance of 170.0 feet; thence east 250.0 feet to the 
        true point of beginning of this description in Section 
        14, Township 19 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette 
        Meridian, Lane County, Oregon.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--Before conveying the 
        parcel to the school district, the Secretary shall 
        ensure that the conditions of buildings and facilities 
        meet the requirements of applicable Federal law.
            (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that 
        the property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be 
        held in public ownership, all right, title, and 
        interest in and to the property shall revert to the 
        United States, at the option of the United States.
    (i) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, at 
        fair market value, to the State of South Carolina, by 
        quitclaim deed, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to the parcels of land described 
        in paragraph (2)(A) that are managed, as of the date of 
        enactment of this Act, by the South Carolina department 
        of commerce for public recreation purposes for the 
        Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, 
        project authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control 
        Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420).
            (2) Land description.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraphs 
                (B) and (C), the parcels of land referred to in 
                paragraph (1) are the parcels contained in the 
                portion of land described in Army Lease Number 
                DACW21-1-92-0500.
                    (B) Retention of interests.--The United 
                States shall retain--
                            (i) ownership of all land included 
                        in the lease referred to in 
                        subparagraph (A) that would have been 
                        acquired for operational purposes in 
                        accordance with the 1971 implementation 
                        of the 1962 Army/Interior Joint 
                        Acquisition Policy; and
                            (ii) such other land as is 
                        determined by the Secretary to be 
                        required for authorized project 
                        purposes, including easement rights-of-
                        way to remaining Federal land.
                    (C) Survey.--The cost of the survey shall 
                be paid by the State.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--
                    (A) In general.--The State shall be 
                responsible for all costs, including real 
                estate transaction and environmental costs, 
                associated with the conveyance under this 
                subsection.
                    (B) Form of contribution.--As determined 
                appropriate by the Secretary, in lieu of 
                payment of compensation to the United States 
                under subparagraph (A), the State may perform 
                certain environmental or real estate actions 
                associated with the conveyance under this 
                subsection if those actions are performed in 
                close coordination with, to the satisfaction 
                of, and in compliance with the laws of the 
                United States.
            (4) Additional terms and conditions.--
                    (A) No effect on shore management policy.--
                The Shoreline Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) 
                of the Corps of Engineers may not be changed or 
                altered for any proposed development of land 
                conveyed under this subsection.
                    (B) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the 
                conveyance under this subsection, the Secretary 
                and the State shall comply with all obligations 
                of any cost sharing agreement between the 
                Secretary and the State in effect as of the 
                date of the conveyance.
                    (C) Land not conveyed.--The State shall 
                continue to manage the land that is subject to 
                Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500 and that is 
                not conveyed under this subsection in 
                accordance with the terms and conditions of 
                Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500.
    (j) Denison, Texas.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        offer to convey at fair market value to the city of 
        Denison, Texas, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to the approximately 900 acres of 
        land located in Grayson County, Texas, which is 
        currently subject to an application for lease for 
        public park and recreational purposes made by the city 
        of Denison, dated August 17, 2005.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact 
        acreage and description of the real property referred 
        to in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey 
        paid for by the city of Denison, Texas, that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Conveyance.--Not later than 90 days after the 
        date of acceptance by the city of Denison, Texas, of an 
        offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall convey 
        the land surveyed under paragraph (2) by quitclaim deed 
        to the city of Denison, Texas.
    (k) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact 
        acreage and the legal description of any real property 
        to be conveyed under this section shall be determined 
        by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (2) Applicability of property screening 
        provisions.--Section 2696 of title 10, United States 
        Code, shall not apply to any conveyance under this 
        section.
            (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary 
        may require that any conveyance under this section be 
        subject to such additional terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary considers appropriate and necessary to 
        protect the interests of the United States.
            (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a 
        conveyance is made under this section shall be 
        responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs, 
        including real estate transaction and environmental 
        documentation costs, associated with the conveyance.
            (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is 
        made under this section shall hold the United States 
        harmless from any liability with respect to activities 
        carried out, on or after the date of the conveyance, on 
        the real property conveyed. The United States shall 
        remain responsible for any liability with respect to 
        activities carried out, before such date, on the real 
        property conveyed.

SEC. 3183. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
                    RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Idaho.--
            (1) In general.--With respect to the property 
        covered by each deed in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) the reversionary interests and use 
                restrictions relating to port and industrial 
                use purposes are extinguished;
                    (B) the restriction that no activity shall 
                be permitted that will compete with services 
                and facilities offered by public marinas is 
                extinguished; and
                    (C) the human habitation or other building 
                structure use restriction is extinguished if 
                the elevation of the property is above the 
                standard project flood elevation.
            (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following 
        county auditor's file numbers are referred to in 
        paragraph (1):
                    (A) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez 
                Perce County, Idaho--2.07 acres.
                    (B) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez 
                Perce County, Idaho--7.32 acres.
    (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma.--
            (1) Release.--Any reversionary interest relating to 
        public parks and recreation on the land conveyed by the 
        Secretary to the State of Oklahoma at Lake Texoma 
        pursuant to the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the 
        sale of certain lands to the State of Oklahoma'' (67 
        Stat. 63), shall terminate on the date of enactment of 
        this Act.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
        shall execute and file in the appropriate office a deed 
        of release, an amended deed, or any other appropriate 
        instrument to release each reversionary interest to 
        which paragraph (1) applies.
            (3) Preservation of reserved rights.--A release of 
        a reversionary interest under this subsection shall not 
        affect any other right of the United States in any deed 
        of conveyance pursuant to the Act referred to in 
        paragraph (1).
    (c) Lowell, Oregon.--
            (1) Release and extinguishment of deed 
        reservations.--
                    (A) Release and extinguishment of deed 
                reservations.--The Secretary may release and 
                extinguish the deed reservations for access and 
                communication cables contained in the quitclaim 
                deed, dated January 26, 1965, and recorded 
                February 15, 1965, in the records of Lane 
                County, Oregon; except that such reservations 
                may only be released and extinguished for the 
                lands owned by the city of Lowell as described 
                in the quitclaim deed, dated April 11, 1991, in 
                such records.
                    (B) Additional release and extinguishment 
                of deed reservations.--The Secretary may also 
                release and extinguish the same deed 
                reservations referred to in subparagraph (A) 
                over land owned by Lane County, Oregon, within 
                the city limits of Lowell, Oregon, to 
                accommodate the development proposals of the 
                city of Lowell/St. Vincent de Paul, Lane 
                County, affordable housing project; except that 
                the Secretary may require, at no cost to the 
                United States--
                            (i) the alteration or relocation of 
                        any existing facilities, utilities, 
                        roads, or similar improvements on such 
                        lands; and
                            (ii) the right-of-way for such 
                        facilities, utilities, roads, or 
                        improvements as a precondition of any 
                        release or extinguishment of the deed 
                        reservations.
            (2) Conveyance.--The Secretary may convey to the 
        city of Lowell, Oregon, the parcel of land situated in 
        the city of Lowell, Oregon, at fair market value 
        consisting of the strip of federally owned lands 
        located northeast of West Boundary Road between Hyland 
        Lane and the city of Lowell's eastward city limits.
            (3) Administrative cost.--Notwithstanding 
        paragraphs (1) and (2), the city of Lowell, Oregon, 
        shall pay the administrative costs incurred by the 
        United States to execute the release and extinguishment 
        of the deed reservations under paragraph (1) and the 
        conveyance under paragraph (2).
    (d) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, 
Tennessee.--
            (1) Release of retained rights, interests, 
        reservations.--With respect to land conveyed by the 
        Secretary to the Tennessee Society of Crippled Children 
        and Adults, Incorporated (commonly known as ``Easter 
        Seals Tennessee'') at Old Hickory Lock and Dam, 
        Cumberland River, Tennessee, under section 211 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1087), the 
        reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
        relating to recreation and camping purposes are 
        extinguished.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
        shall execute and file in the appropriate office a deed 
        of release, amended deed, or other appropriate 
        instrument effectuating the release of interests 
        required by paragraph (1).
    (e) Lower Granite Pool, Washington.--
            (1) Extinguishment of reversionary interests and 
        use restrictions.--With respect to property covered by 
        each deed described in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) the reversionary interests and use 
                restrictions relating to port or industrial 
                purposes are extinguished; and
                    (B) the human habitation or other building 
                structure use restriction is extinguished in 
                each area in which the elevation is above the 
                standard project flood elevation.
            (2) Deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraph (1) 
        are as follows:
                    (A) Auditor's File Numbers 432576, 443411, 
                499988, and 579771 of Whitman County, 
                Washington.
                    (B) Auditor's File Numbers 125806, 138801, 
                147888, 154511, 156928, and 176360 of Asotin 
                County, Washington.
    (f) Port of Pasco, Washington.--
            (1) Extinguishment of use restrictions and flowage 
        easement.--With respect to the property covered by the 
        deed in paragraph (3)(A)--
                    (A) the flowage easement and human 
                habitation or other building structure use 
                restriction is extinguished if the elevation of 
                the property is above the standard project 
                flood elevation; and
                    (B) the use of fill material to raise areas 
                of the property above the standard project 
                flood elevation is authorized, except in any 
                area for which a permit under section 404 of 
                the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
                U.S.C. 1344) is required.
            (2) Extinguishment of flowage easement.--With 
        respect to the property covered by each deed in 
        paragraph (3)(B), the flowage easement is extinguished 
        if the elevation of the property is above the standard 
        project flood elevation.
            (3) Affected deeds.--The deeds referred to in 
        paragraphs (1) and (2) are as follows:
                    (A) Auditor's File Number 262980 of 
                Franklin County, Washington.
                    (B) Auditor's File Numbers 263334 and 
                404398 of Franklin County, Washington.
    (g) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section 
affects the remaining rights and interests of the Corps of 
Engineers for authorized project purposes.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

    Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-21) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal 
interest may provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal share 
required under subsection (f) in the form of in-kind services 
and materials.''.

SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the nature 
and frequency of avian botulism problems in the vicinity of 
Lake Erie associated with dredged material disposal sites and 
shall make recommendations to eliminate the conditions that 
result in such problems.

SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the 
Secretary of Commerce, and other appropriate agencies, shall 
conduct, at Federal expense, a comprehensive study of drought 
conditions in the southwestern United States, with particular 
emphasis on the Colorado River basin, the Rio Grande River 
basin, and the Great Basin.
    (b) Inventory of Actions.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall assemble an inventory of actions taken or 
planned to be taken to address drought-related situations in 
the southwestern United States.
    (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the study shall be to develop 
recommendations to more effectively address current and future 
drought conditions in the southwestern United States.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
$7,000,000. Such funds shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER.

    The Secretary shall review, in consultation with the 
Delaware River Basin Commission and the States of Delaware, 
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, the report of the Chief 
of Engineers on the Delaware River, published as House Document 
Numbered 522, 87th Congress, Second Session, as it relates to 
the Mid-Delaware River Basin from Wilmington to Port Jervis, 
and any other pertinent reports (including the strategy for 
resolution of interstate flow management issues in the Delaware 
River Basin dated August 2004 and the National Park Service 
Lower Delaware River Management Plan (1997-1999)), with a view 
to determining whether any modifications of recommendations 
contained in the first report referred to are advisable at the 
present time, in the interest of flood damage reduction, 
ecosystem restoration, and other related problems.

SEC. 4005. EURASIAN MILFOIL.

    Under the authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary shall conduct a 
study, at Federal expense, to develop national protocols for 
the use of the Euhrychiopsis lecontei weevil for biological 
control of Eurasian milfoil in the lakes of Vermont and other 
northeastern States.

SEC. 4006. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational 
improvements, including a barge landing facility, Fire Island, 
Alaska.

SEC. 4007. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
potential impacts on navigation of construction of a bridge 
across Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

SEC. 4008. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, Kuskokwim 
River, Alaska, in the vicinity of the village of Crooked Creek.

SEC. 4009. NOME HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall review the project for navigation, Nome 
Harbor improvements, Alaska, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 273), to 
determine whether the project cost increases, including the 
cost of rebuilding the entrance channel damaged in a September 
2005 storm, resulted from a design deficiency.

SEC. 4010. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of providing navigation improvements at St. George 
Harbor, Alaska.

SEC. 4011. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for hydropower, 
recreation, and related purposes on the Susitna River, Alaska.

SEC. 4012. VALDEZ, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, Valdez, 
Alaska, and if the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible, shall carry out the project at a total cost of 
$20,000,000.

SEC. 4013. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
damage reduction, Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
    (b) Review of Plans.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall review plans and designs developed by non-
Federal interests and shall incorporate such plans and designs 
into the Federal study if the Secretary determines that such 
plans and designs are consistent with Federal standards.

SEC. 4014. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply source 
for Searcy County, Arkansas.

SEC. 4015. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for streambank protection 
and environmental restoration along Aliso Creek, California.

SEC. 4016. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
Fresno, Kings, and Kern Counties, California.

SEC. 4017. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall prepare a 
comprehensive report that examines the condition of the 
existing Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda County, 
California (referred to in this section as the ``Railroad 
Bridge''), and determines the most economic means to maintain 
that rail link by either repairing or replacing the Railroad 
Bridge.
    (b) Requirements.--The report under this section shall 
include--
            (1) a determination of whether the Railroad Bridge 
        is in immediate danger of failing or collapsing;
            (2) the annual costs to maintain the Railroad 
        Bridge;
            (3) the costs to place the Railroad Bridge in a 
        safe, ``no-collapse'' condition, such that the Railroad 
        Bridge will not endanger maritime traffic;
            (4) the costs to retrofit the Railroad Bridge such 
        that the Railroad Bridge may continue to serve as a 
        rail link between the Island of Alameda and the 
        mainland; and
            (5) the costs to construct a replacement for the 
        Railroad Bridge capable of serving the current and 
        future rail, light rail, and homeland security needs of 
        the region.
    (c) Submission of Report.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) complete the Railroad Bridge report under 
        subsection (a) not later than 180 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act; and
            (2) submit the report to the Committee on 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives.
    (d) Limitations.--The Secretary shall not--
            (1) demolish the Railroad Bridge or otherwise 
        render the Railroad Bridge unavailable or unusable for 
        rail traffic; or
            (2) reduce maintenance of the Railroad Bridge.
    (e) Easement.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the 
        city of Alameda, California, a nonexclusive access 
        easement over the Oakland Estuary that comprises the 
        subsurface land and surface approaches for the Railroad 
        Bridge that--
                    (A) is consistent with the Bay Trail 
                Proposal of the city of Oakland; and
                    (B) is otherwise suitable for the 
                improvement, operation, and maintenance of the 
                Railroad Bridge or construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of a suitable replacement bridge.
            (2) Cost.--The easement under paragraph (1) shall 
        be provided to the city of Alameda without 
        consideration and at no cost to the United States.

SEC. 4018. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
city of Los Angeles, shall--
            (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental 
        ecosystem restoration, flood control, recreation, and 
        other aspects of Los Angeles River revitalization that 
        is consistent with the goals of the Los Angeles River 
        Revitalization Master Plan published by the city of Los 
        Angeles; and
            (2) consider any locally-preferred project 
        alternatives developed through a full and open 
        evaluation process for inclusion in the study.
    (b) Use of Existing Information and Measures.--In preparing 
the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use, to the 
maximum extent practicable--
            (1) information obtained from the Los Angeles River 
        Revitalization Master Plan; and
            (2) the development process of that plan.
    (c) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        construct demonstration projects in order to provide 
        information to develop the study under subsection 
        (a)(1).
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of any project under this subsection shall be not more 
        than 65 percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
        subsection $25,000,000.

SEC. 4019. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction and groundwater recharge, Lytle Creek, Rialto, 
California.

SEC. 4020. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for water 
supply along the Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, 
California.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to invalidate, preempt, or create 
any exception to State water law, State water rights, or 
Federal or State permitted activities or agreements.

SEC. 4021. ORICK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Orick, California.
    (b) Feasibility of Restoring or Rehabilitating Redwook 
Creek Levees.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
determine the feasibility of restoring or rehabilitating the 
Redwood Creek Levees, Humboldt County, California.

SEC. 4022. SHORELINE STUDY, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ``32 months'' and 
inserting ``44 months''.

SEC. 4023. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.

SEC. 4024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to 
determine the feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures to 
protect water diversion facilities and fish protective screen 
facilities in the vicinity of river mile 178 on the Sacramento 
River, California.

SEC. 4025. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, San 
Diego County, California, including a review of the feasibility 
of connecting 4 existing reservoirs to increase usable storage 
capacity.

SEC. 4026. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged 
material from the San Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San 
Joaquin Delta, California, including the benefits and impacts 
of salinity in the Delta and the benefits to navigation, flood 
damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, water quality, 
salinity control, water supply reliability, and recreation.
    (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall cooperate with the California department of water 
resources and appropriate Federal and State entities in 
developing options for the beneficial use of dredged material 
from San Francisco Bay for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta 
area.
    (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the 
feasibility of using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for 
levee maintenance material, as well as for ecosystem 
restoration. The review may include carrying out and monitoring 
a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic yards of dredged 
material and being carried out at the Sherman Island site, 
examining larger scale use of dredged materials from the San 
Francisco Bay and Suisun Bay Channel, and analyzing the 
feasibility of the potential use of saline materials from the 
San Francisco Bay for both rehandling and ecosystem restoration 
purposes.

SEC. 4027. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with non-
Federal interests, shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for--
            (1) flood damage reduction along the South San 
        Francisco Bay shoreline, California;
            (2) restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt 
        ponds (including on land owned by other Federal 
        agencies); and
            (3) other related purposes, as the Secretary 
        determines to be appropriate.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        submit to Congress a report describing the results of 
        the study under subsection (a).
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) 
        shall include recommendations of the Secretary with 
        respect to the project described in subsection (a) 
        based on planning, design, and land acquisition 
        documents prepared by--
                    (A) the California State Coastal 
                Conservancy;
                    (B) the Santa Clara Valley Water District; 
                and
                    (C) other local interests.
    (c) Credit.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with section 221 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), and 
        subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary shall credit 
        toward the non-Federal share of the cost of any project 
        authorized by law as a result of the South San 
        Francisco Bay shoreline study--
                    (A) the cost of work performed by the non-
                Federal interest in preparation of the 
                feasibility study that is conducted before the 
                date of the feasibility cost sharing agreement; 
                and
                    (B) the funds expended by the non-Federal 
                interest for acquisition costs of land that 
                constitutes a part of such a project and that 
                is owned by the United States Fish and Wildlife 
                Service.
            (2) Conditions.--The Secretary may provide credit 
        under paragraph (1) if--
                    (A) the value of all or any portion of land 
                referred to in paragraph (1)(B) that would be 
                subject to the credit has not previously been 
                credited to the non-Federal interest for a 
                project; and
                    (B) the land was not acquired to meet any 
                mitigation requirement of the non-Federal 
                interest.

SEC. 4028. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction 
in the vicinity of Twentynine Palms, California.

SEC. 4029. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Burnt Mountain basin, in the vicinity of Yucca 
Valley, California.

SEC. 4030. SELENIUM STUDIES, COLORADO.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the United States 
Geological Survey, in consultation with State water quality and 
resource and conservation agencies, shall conduct regional and 
watershed-wide studies to address selenium concentrations in 
the State of Colorado, including studies--
            (1) to measure selenium on specific sites; and
            (2) to determine whether specific selenium measures 
        studied should be recommended for use in demonstration 
        projects.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 4031. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
                    WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction and related purposes along the Delaware and Christina 
Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, Delaware.

SEC. 4032. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC COAST, 
                    DELAWARE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of modifying the project for 
navigation, Indian River Inlet and Bay, Delaware.
    (b) Factors for Consideration and Priority.--In carrying 
out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) take into consideration all necessary 
        activities to stabilize the scour holes threatening the 
        Inlet and Bay shorelines; and
            (2) give priority to stabilizing and restoring the 
        Inlet channel and scour holes adjacent to the United 
        States Coast Guard pier and helipad and the adjacent 
        State-owned properties.

SEC. 4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction and flood damage reduction in the vicinity of 
Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and Naples beaches, Collier County, 
Florida.

SEC. 4034. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
restoration, including improved water quality, and related 
purposes, Lower St. Johns River, Florida.

SEC. 4035. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION 
                    REPORT, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish a 
supplemental report to the major rehabilitation report for the 
Herbert Hoover Dike system approved by the Chief of Engineers 
in November 2000.
    (b) Inclusions.--The supplemental report under subsection 
(a) shall include--
            (1) an evaluation of existing conditions at the 
        Herbert Hoover Dike system;
            (2) an identification of additional risks 
        associated with flood events at the system that are 
        equal to or greater than the standard projected flood 
        risks;
            (3) an evaluation of the potential to integrate 
        projects of the Corps of Engineers into an enhanced 
        flood protection system for Lake Okeechobee, 
        including--
                    (A) the potential for additional water 
                storage north of Lake Okeechobee; and
                    (B) an analysis of other project features 
                included in the Comprehensive Everglades 
                Restoration Plan; and
            (4) a review of the report prepared for the South 
        Florida Water Management District dated April 2006.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.

SEC. 4036. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
restoration, water supply, and improvement of water quality at 
Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.

SEC. 4037. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
Meriwether County, Georgia.

SEC. 4038. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized 
by section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 324), is modified--
            (1) to add ecosystem restoration and water supply 
        as project purposes to be studied; and
            (2) to require the Secretary to credit toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the study the cost, 
        not to exceed $500,000, of work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
        that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 4039. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for ecosystem 
restoration, Ballard's Island side channel, Illinois.

SEC. 4040. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan 
and'' before ``the Chicago River''.

SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project to provide an additional 
water supply source for Salem, Indiana.

SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of modifying the project for flood 
damage reduction, Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky, authorized by 
section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1217), to add ecosystem restoration and recreation as project 
purposes.
    (b) In-Kind Contributions.--The non-Federal interest may 
provide the non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the 
form of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of modifying the project for Dewey Lake, Kentucky, 
to add water supply as a project purpose.

SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
flood control, Louisville, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of 
the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to 
investigate measures to address the rehabilitation of the 
project.

SEC. 4045. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation 
improvement at Vidalia, Louisiana.

SEC. 4046. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of deepening that portion of the navigation channel 
of the navigation project for Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts 
and Rhode Island, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), seaward of the Charles M. 
Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and Somerset, 
Massachusetts.

SEC. 4047. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.

SEC. 4048. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction on Ore Lake and the Huron River for Hamburg and Green 
Oak Townships, Michigan.

SEC. 4049. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for storm damage 
reduction and other related purposes along Lake Erie at Luna 
Pier, Michigan.

SEC. 4050. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study and 
prepare a report to evaluate the integrity of the bulkhead 
system located on and in the vicinity of Duluth-Superior 
Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, and Superior, Wisconsin.
    (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
            (1) a determination of causes of corrosion of the 
        bulkhead system;
            (2) recommendations to reduce corrosion of the 
        bulkhead system;
            (3) a description of the necessary repairs to the 
        bulkhead system; and
            (4) an estimate of the cost of addressing the 
        causes of the corrosion and carrying out necessary 
        repairs.

SEC. 4051. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Tennessee-
Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi, to provide water 
supply for northeast Mississippi.

SEC. 4052. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project in the vicinity of the 
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, New Jersey, for the 
construction of a dredged material disposal transfer facility 
to make dredged material available for beneficial reuse.

SEC. 4053. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
restoration, including improved water quality, enhanced public 
access, and recreation, on the Kill Van Kull, Bayonne, New 
Jersey.

SEC. 4054. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
restoration, including improved water quality, enhanced public 
access, and recreation, on the Raritan River, Carteret, New 
Jersey.

SEC. 4055. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Gloucester County, New Jersey, including the 
feasibility of restoring the flood protection dikes in 
Gibbstown, New Jersey, and the associated tidegates in 
Gloucester County, New Jersey.

SEC. 4056. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
restoration and recreation on the Arthur Kill, Perth Amboy, New 
Jersey.

SEC. 4057. BATAVIA, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for hydropower and 
related purposes in the vicinity of Batavia, New York.

SEC. 4058. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
damage reduction, Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
    (b) Evaluation of Potential Solutions.--In conducting the 
study, the Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to 
flooding from all sources, including flooding that results from 
ice jams.

SEC. 4059. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem 
restoration and protection, Finger Lakes, New York, to address 
water quality and aquatic nuisance species.

SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for storm damage 
reduction and shoreline protection in the vicinity of Gallagher 
Beach, Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.

SEC. 4061. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out ecosystem restoration improvements 
on Newtown Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, New York.

SEC. 4062. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for a low-head 
hydroelectric generating facility in the Niagara River, New 
York.

SEC. 4063. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for shoreline protection in the vicinity 
of the confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New 
York Bay, Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.

SEC. 4064. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK.

    In accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a nonprofit organization may serve, 
with the consent of the affected local government, as the non-
Federal interest for a study for the Upper Delaware River 
watershed, New York, being carried out under Committee 
Resolution 2495 of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, adopted May 9, 
1996.

SEC. 4065. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of existing water and 
water quality-related infrastructure in Lincoln County, North 
Carolina, to assist local interests in determining the most 
efficient and effective way to connect county infrastructure.

SEC. 4066. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, Wilkes 
County, North Carolina.

SEC. 4067. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
Yadkinville, North Carolina.

SEC. 4068. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction 
in Cuyahoga, Lake, Ashtabula, Geauga, Erie, Lucas, Sandusky, 
Huron, and Stark Counties, Ohio.

SEC. 4069. LAKE ERIE, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for power generation at 
confined disposal facilities along Lake Erie, Ohio.

SEC. 4070. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction 
on the Ohio River in Mahoning, Columbiana, Jefferson, Belmont, 
Noble, Monroe, Washington, Athens, Meigs, Gallia, Lawrence, and 
Scioto Counties, Ohio.

SEC. 4071. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall study the feasibility of removing 
previously dredged and placed materials from the Toledo Harbor 
confined disposal facility, transporting the materials, and 
disposing of the materials in or at abandoned mine sites in 
southeastern Ohio.

SEC. 4072. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL PROJECT, 
                    TOLEDO, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of constructing a project for 
navigation, Toledo, Ohio.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In conducting the study 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into 
consideration--
            (1) realigning the existing Toledo Harbor channel 
        widening occurring where the River Channel meets the 
        Lake Channel from the northwest to the southeast side 
        of the River Channel;
            (2) realigning the entire 200-foot wide channel 
        located at the upper river terminus of the River 
        Channel southern river embankment towards the northern 
        river embankment; and
            (3) adjusting the existing turning basin to 
        accommodate those changes.

SEC. 4073. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration 
and fish passage improvements on rivers throughout the State of 
Oregon.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, 
        local governments, and other Federal agencies; and
            (2) place emphasis on--
                    (A) fish passage and conservation and 
                restoration strategies to benefit species that 
                are listed or proposed for listing as 
                threatened or endangered species under the 
                Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 
                et seq.); and
                    (B) other watershed restoration objectives.
    (c) Pilot Program.--
            (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the 
        study under subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out 
        pilot projects to demonstrate the effectiveness of 
        ecosystem restoration and fish passages.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out 
        this subsection.

SEC. 4074. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    In conducting the study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla 
River basin, Oregon, the Secretary shall--
            (1) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the study the cost of work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
        that the work is integral to the project; and
            (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the form 
        of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 4075. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4076. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
flood control, Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Warren, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act 
of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), and modified by section 2 of 
the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), section 
2 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 646), 
and section 4 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
Stat. 887), to review operations of and identify modifications 
to the project to expand recreational opportunities.

SEC. 4077. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of 
structural and nonstructural flood damage reduction, stream 
bank protection, storm water management, channel clearing and 
modification, and watershed coordination measures in the 
Mahoning River basin, Pennsylvania, the Allegheny River basin, 
Pennsylvania, and the Upper Ohio River basin, Pennsylvania, to 
provide a level of flood protection sufficient to prevent 
future losses to communities located in such basins from 
flooding such as occurred in September 2004, but not less than 
a 100-year level of flood protection.
    (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary shall give priority to the following Pennsylvania 
communities: Marshall Township, Ross Township, Shaler Township, 
Jackson Township, Harmony, Zelienople, Darlington Township, 
Houston Borough, Chartiers Township, Washington, Canton 
Township, Tarentum Borough, and East Deer Township.

SEC. 4078. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
flood control, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, authorized by 
section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 
1570), to investigate measures to rehabilitate the project.

SEC. 4079. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, at Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania, including the 
alternative of raising River Road.

SEC. 4080. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
reevaluate the project for flood damage reduction and water 
supply, Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico, authorized by 
section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197) 
and section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1828), to determine the feasibility of carrying out the 
project.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the study the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 4081. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, 
                    RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study, and, not later than 
June 30, 2008, submit to Congress a report that describes the 
results of the study, on the flood damage reduction project, 
Woonsocket, Blackstone River basin, Rhode Island, authorized by 
section 10 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
Stat. 892), to determine the measures necessary to restore the 
level of protection of the project as originally designed and 
constructed.

SEC. 4082. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, Crooked 
Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.

SEC. 4083. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, Broad 
River, York County, South Carolina.

SEC. 4084. SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects--
            (1) to improve the Savannah River for navigation 
        and related purposes that may be necessary to support 
        the location of container cargo and other port 
        facilities to be located in Jasper County, South 
        Carolina, in the vicinity of Mile 6 of the Savannah 
        Harbor entrance channel; and
            (2) to remove from the proposed Jasper County port 
        site the easements used by the Corps of Engineers for 
        placement of dredged fill materials for the Savannah 
        Harbor Federal navigation project.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In making a determination 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into 
consideration--
            (1) landside infrastructure;
            (2) the provision of any additional dredged 
        material disposal area as a consequence of removing 
        from the proposed Jasper County port site the easements 
        used by the Corps of Engineers for placement of dredged 
        fill materials for the Savannah Harbor Federal 
        navigation project; and
            (3) the results of the proposed bistate compact 
        between the State of Georgia and the State of South 
        Carolina to own, develop, and operate port facilities 
        at the proposed Jasper County port site, as described 
        in the term sheet executed by the Governor of the State 
        of Georgia and the Governor of the State of South 
        Carolina on March 12, 2007.

SEC. 4085. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Chattanooga Creek, Dobbs Branch, Chattanooga, 
Tennessee.

SEC. 4086. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Cleveland, Tennessee.

SEC. 4087. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for recreation on, 
riverbank protection for, and environmental protection of, the 
Cumberland River and riparian habitats in the city of Nashville 
and Davidson County, Tennessee.

SEC. 4088. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.

SEC. 4089. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, in the vicinity 
of Memphis, Tennessee, to include the repair, replacement, 
rehabilitation, and restoration of the following pumping 
stations: Cypress Creek, Nonconnah Creek, Ensley, Marble Bayou, 
and Bayou Gayoso.

SEC. 4090. ABILENE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
Abilene, Texas.

SEC. 4091. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop a 
comprehensive plan to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for flood damage reduction, hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, and ecosystem restoration in the coastal areas of 
the State of Texas.
    (b) Scope.--The comprehensive plan shall provide for the 
protection, conservation, and restoration of wetlands, barrier 
islands, shorelines, and related lands and features that 
protect critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure from 
the impacts of coastal storms, hurricanes, erosion, and 
subsidence.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``coastal areas in the State of Texas'' means the coastal areas 
of the State of Texas from the Sabine River on the east to the 
Rio Grande River on the west and includes tidal waters, barrier 
islands, marshes, coastal wetlands, rivers and streams, and 
adjacent areas.

SEC. 4092. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for dredged material disposal in the 
vicinity of the project for navigation and environmental 
restoration, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, 
authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).

SEC. 4093. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
Grand County and the city of Moab, Utah, including a review of 
the impact of current and future demands on the Spanish Valley 
Aquifer.

SEC. 4094. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Santa Clara River, Washington, Iron, and Kane 
Counties, Utah.

SEC. 4095. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
potential to carry out ecosystem restoration and hydropower 
generation at dams in the State of Vermont, including a review 
of the report of the Secretary on the land and water resources 
of the New England-New York region submitted to the President 
on April 27, 1956 (published as Senate Document Number 14, 85th 
Congress), and other relevant reports.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) 
shall be to determine the feasibility of providing water 
resource improvements and small-scale hydropower generation in 
the State of Vermont, including, as appropriate, options for 
dam restoration, hydropower, dam removal, and fish passage 
enhancement.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to carry out this section $500,000. Such sums shall remain 
available until expended.

SEC. 4096. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The study for rehabilitation of the 
Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington, being carried out 
under Committee Resolution 2704 of the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives adopted September 25, 2002, is modified to 
include a determination of the feasibility of reducing future 
damage to the seawall from seismic activity.
    (b) Acceptance of Contributions.--In carrying out the 
study, the Secretary may accept contributions in excess of the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the study from the non-Federal 
interest to the extent that the Secretary determines that the 
contributions will facilitate completion of the study.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a 
result of the study the value of contributions accepted by the 
Secretary under subsection (b).

SEC. 4097. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
protection projects in the watersheds of the Monongahela River 
Basin lying within the counties of Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, 
Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, 
Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, 
Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia.

SEC. 4098. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, Kenosha 
Harbor, Wisconsin, including the extension of existing piers.

SEC. 4099. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Johnsonville 
Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin, to determine if the structure 
prevents ice jams on the Sheboygan River.

SEC. 4100. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration, Menomonee River and 
Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, and greater Milwaukee 
watersheds, Wisconsin.

SEC. 4101. DEBRIS REMOVAL.

    (a) Evaluation.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 
        of the United States, in coordination with the 
        Secretary and the Administrator of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency, and in consultation with affected 
        communities, shall conduct a complete evaluation of 
        Federal and non-Federal demolition, debris removal, 
        segregation, transportation, and disposal practices 
        relating to disaster areas designated in response to 
        Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (including regulated and 
        nonregulated materials and debris).
            (2) Inclusions.--The evaluation under paragraph (1) 
        shall include a review of--
                    (A) compliance with all applicable 
                environmental laws;
                    (B) permits issued or required to be issued 
                with respect to debris handling, 
                transportation, storage, or disposal; and
                    (C) administrative actions relating to 
                debris removal and disposal in the disaster 
                areas described in paragraph (1).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General, in consultation 
with the Secretary and the Administrator, shall submit to the 
Committee on the Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives a report that--
            (1) describes the findings of the Comptroller 
        General with respect to the evaluation under subsection 
        (a);
            (2)(A) certifies compliance with all applicable 
        environmental laws; and
            (B) identifies any area in which a violation of 
        such a law has occurred or is occurring;
            (3) includes recommendations to ensure--
                    (A) the protection of the environment;
                    (B) sustainable practices; and
                    (C) the integrity of hurricane and flood 
                protection infrastructure relating to debris 
                disposal practices;
            (4) contains an enforcement plan that is designed 
        to prevent illegal dumping of hurricane debris in a 
        disaster area; and
            (5) contains plans of the Secretary and the 
        Administrator to involve the public and non-Federal 
        interests, including through the formation of a Federal 
        advisory committee, as necessary, to seek public 
        comment relating to the removal, disposal, and planning 
        for the handling of post-hurricane debris.
    (c) Restriction.--
            (1) In general.--No Federal funds may be used to 
        pay for or reimburse any State or local entity in 
        Louisiana for the disposal of construction and 
        demolition debris generated as a result of Hurricane 
        Katrina in 2005 in a landfill designated for 
        construction and demolition debris as described in 
        section 257.2 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, 
        unless that waste meets the definition of construction 
        and demolition debris, as specified under Federal law 
        and described in that section on the date of enactment 
        of this Act.
            (2) Applicability.--The restriction in paragraph 
        (1) shall apply only to any disposal that occurs after 
        the date of enactment of this Act.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, 
the Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the 
following navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or 
improved by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary 
determines that such maintenance is economically justified and 
environmentally acceptable and that the channel or breakwater 
was constructed in accordance with applicable permits and 
appropriate engineering and design standards:
            (1) Manatee Harbor basin, Florida.
            (2) Tampa Harbor, Sparkman Channel and Davis 
        Island, Florida.
            (3) West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
            (4) Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, 
        Louisiana.
            (5) Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana.
            (6) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial 
        Park, Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
            (7) Houston Ship Channel, Bayport Cruise Channel 
        and Bayport Cruise turning basin, as part of the 
        existing Bayport Channel, Texas.
            (8) Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, 
        Texas.
            (9) Jacintoport Channel at Houston Ship Channel, 
        Texas.
            (10) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
    (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months 
after the date of receipt of a request from a non-Federal 
interest for Federal assumption of maintenance of a channel 
listed in subsection (a), the Secretary shall make a 
determination as provided in subsection (a) and advise the non-
Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.

SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, 
planning, and design assistance to non-Federal interests for 
carrying out watershed management, restoration, and development 
projects at the locations described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under 
subsection (a) may be in support of non-Federal projects for 
the following purposes:
            (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
            (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
            (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, 
        wetlands, and other water bodies to their natural 
        condition as a means to control flooding, excessive 
        erosion, and sedimentation.
            (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, 
        including urban watersheds.
            (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural 
        measures to reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 25 
percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in 
subsection (a) are the following:
            (1) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.
            (2) Those portions of the watersheds of the 
        Chattahoochee, Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee 
        Rivers lying within the counties of Bartow, Cherokee, 
        Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, 
        Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Paulding, 
        Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia.
            (3) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
            (4) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
            (5) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish 
        and Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.
            (6) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
            (7) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts.
            (8) Marlboro Township, New Jersey.
            (9) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, 
        Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, New York.
            (10) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and New 
        Jersey.
            (11) Long Island Sound watershed, New York.
            (12) Ramapo River watershed, New York.
            (13) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.
            (14) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio.
            (15) Those portions of the watersheds of the 
        Beaver, Upper Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, 
        Kiskiminetas, Lower Monongahela, Youghiogheny, 
        Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying within the counties 
        of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, Pennsylvania.
            (16) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
            (17) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (18) Sauk River basin, Washington.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to 
enhance dam safety at the following locations:
            (1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
            (2) Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois.
            (3) Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, Fulton County, 
        Indiana.
            (4) Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan.
            (5) Congers Lake Dam, Rockland County, New York.
            (6) Lake Lucille Dam, New City, New York.
            (7) Peconic River Dams, town of Riverhead, Suffolk, 
        Long Island, New York.
            (8) Pine Grove Lakes Dam, Sloatsburg, New York.
            (9) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
            (10) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
            (11) Brightwood Dam, Concord Township, Ohio.
            (12) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (13) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
            (14) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
            (15) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, 
        Pennsylvania.
    (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection 
(a) for State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project for 
rehabilitation in accordance with the report on State Dam 
Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake Outlet, New York, dated March 1999, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out subsection (a) $12,000,000.

SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, 
the Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and 
effectiveness of a project for flood damage reduction and, if 
the Secretary determines that the project does not meet such 
minimum standards as the Secretary may establish and absent 
action by the Secretary the project will fail, the Secretary 
may take such action as may be necessary to restore the 
integrity and effectiveness of the project.
    (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall carry out an evaluation 
and take such actions as may be necessary under subsection (a) 
for the project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas River 
Levees, Arkansas.

SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 212(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraphs 
        (23) and (27);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
        (28) and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and
            ``(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 212(i)(1) of 
such Act (33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by striking 
``section--'' and all that follows before the period at the end 
and inserting ``section $20,000,000''.

SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 
Stat. 334) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
        (7);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
        (8) and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(18);
            ``(10) $27,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(19);
            ``(11) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(20);
            ``(12) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(23);
            ``(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(25);
            ``(14) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(26);
            ``(15) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(27);
            ``(16) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(28); and
            ``(17) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(40).''.
    (b) East Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.--Federal 
assistance made available under the rural enterprise zone 
program of the Department of Agriculture may be used toward 
payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of the project 
described in section 219(c)(20) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-219) if such 
assistance is authorized to be used for such purposes.

SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
                    PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall 
expedite completion of construction for the following projects:
            (1) Project for navigation, Whittier, Alaska.
            (2) Laguna Creek watershed flood damage reduction 
        project, California.
            (3) Daytona Beach shore protection project, 
        Florida.
            (4) Flagler Beach shore protection project, 
        Florida.
            (5) St. Johns County shore protection project, 
        Florida.
            (6) Chenier Plain environmental restoration 
        project, Louisiana.
            (7) False River, Louisiana, being carried out under 
        section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (8) North River, Peabody, Massachusetts, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
        of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (9) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, 
        being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (10) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, 
        being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (11) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, 
        being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (12) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New 
        York, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (13) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney 
        Point, New York, being carried out under section 1135 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2309a).
            (14) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, 
        being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).

SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of 
the reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary 
determines that a project is justified in the completed report, 
proceed directly to project preconstruction, engineering, and 
design:
            (1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, 
        Arkansas.
            (2) Watershed study, Fountain Creek, north of 
        Pueblo, Colorado.
            (3) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont 
        Key, Florida.
            (4) Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, 
        Texas and Louisiana.
            (5) Project for ecosystem restoration, University 
        Lake, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
    (b) Special Rule for Egmont Key, Florida.--In carrying out 
the project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida, 
referred to in subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall waive any 
cost share to be provided by non-Federal interests for any 
portion of the project that benefits federally owned property.

SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal 
expense, an assessment of the water resources needs of the 
river basins and watersheds of the southeastern United States.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out the 
assessment, the Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements 
with State and local agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit 
entities, and regional researchers.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $7,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5010. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

    Section 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by adding at the end 
        the following: ``The Secretary shall ensure that such 
        activities are carried out throughout the geographic 
        area that is subject to the plan.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as 
        subsections (g) and (h), respectively;
            (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the 
        following:
    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)), for any project or activity carried out under this 
section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity 
with the consent of the affected local government.'';
            (4) in subsection (g) (as redesignated by paragraph 
        (2) of this section) by adding at the end the 
        following:
            ``(4) Non-federal share.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal share of 
                the costs of activities carried out under the 
                plan may be provided--
                            ``(i) in cash;
                            ``(ii) by the provision of land, 
                        easements, rights-of-way, relocations, 
                        or disposal areas;
                            ``(iii) by in-kind services to 
                        implement the project; or
                            ``(iv) by any combination thereof.
                    ``(B) Private ownership.--Land needed for 
                activities carried out under the plan and 
                credited toward the non-Federal share of the 
                cost of an activity may remain in private 
                ownership subject to easements that are--
                            ``(i) satisfactory to the 
                        Secretary; and
                            ``(ii) necessary to ensure 
                        achievement of the project purposes.''; 
                        and
            (5) in subsection (h) (as redesignated by paragraph 
        (2) of this section) by striking ``for the period of 
        fiscal years 2003 and 2004.'' and inserting ``per 
        fiscal year through fiscal year 2015.''.

SEC. 5011. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration.--Section 
506(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-22(c)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
        paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Reconnaissance studies.--Before planning, 
        designing, or constructing a project under paragraph 
        (3), the Secretary shall carry out a reconnaissance 
        study--
                    ``(A) to identify methods of restoring the 
                fishery, ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the 
                Great Lakes; and
                    ``(B) to determine whether planning of a 
                project under paragraph (3) should proceed.''; 
                and
            (3) in paragraph (4)(A) (as redesignated by 
        paragraph (1) of this subsection) by striking 
        ``paragraph (2)'' and inserting ``paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 506(f) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``The Federal share'' and 
                inserting ``Except for reconnaissance studies, 
                the Federal share''; and
                    (B) by striking ``(2) or (3)'' and 
                inserting ``(3) or (4)'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking 
                ``subsection (c)(2)'' and inserting 
                ``subsection (c)(3)''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``50 
                percent'' and inserting ``100 percent''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5) by striking 
        ``Notwithstanding'' and inserting ``In accordance 
        with''.

SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (33 U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 114 Stat. 2613) is 
amended by striking ``through 2006'' and inserting ``through 
2012''.

SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS.

    Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``through 
2006'' and inserting ``through 2012''.

SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION AND PROTECTION.

    (a) Great Lakes Navigation.--Using available funds, the 
Secretary shall expedite the operation and maintenance, 
including dredging, of the navigation features of the Great 
Lakes and Connecting Channels for the purpose of supporting 
commercial navigation to authorized project depths.
    (b) Great Lakes Pilot Project.--Using available funds, the 
Director of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, in 
coordination with the Secretary, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, the Commandant of the Coast 
Guard, and the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, shall carry out a pilot project, on an emergency 
basis, to control and prevent further spreading of viral 
hemorrhagic septicemia in the Great Lakes and Connecting 
Channels.
    (c) Great Lakes and Connecting Channels Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``Great Lakes and Connecting Channels'' 
includes Lakes Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario, 
all connecting waters between and among such lakes used for 
commercial navigation, any navigation features in such lakes or 
waters that are a Federal operation or maintenance 
responsibility, and areas of the Saint Lawrence River that are 
operated or maintained by the Federal Government for commercial 
navigation.

SEC. 5015. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, using amounts 
contributed by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation under subsection (b), to carry out projects for 
operations, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation, including 
associated maintenance dredging, of the Eisenhower and Snell 
lock facilities and related navigational infrastructure for the 
Saint Lawrence Seaway, at a total cost of $134,650,000.
    (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary is authorized to accept 
funds from the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation to 
carry out projects under this section. Such funds may include 
amounts made available to the Corporation from the Harbor 
Maintenance Trust Fund and the general fund of the Treasury of 
the United States pursuant to section 210 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238).
    (c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
section authorizes the construction of any project to increase 
the depth or width of the navigation channel to a level greater 
than that previously authorized and existing on the date of 
enactment of this Act or to increase the dimensions of the 
Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities.

SEC. 5016. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal and State agencies, shall study, design, 
and carry out a project to delay, deter, impede, or restrict 
the dispersal of aquatic nuisance species into the northern 
reaches of the Upper Mississippi River system. The Secretary 
shall complete the study, design, and construction of the 
project not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Dispersal Barrier.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
            (1) investigate and identify environmentally sound 
        methods for preventing and reducing the dispersal of 
        aquatic nuisance species through the northern reaches 
        of the Upper Mississippi River system;
            (2) use available technologies and measures;
            (3) monitor and evaluate, in cooperation with the 
        Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
        Service, the effectiveness of the project in preventing 
        and reducing the dispersal of aquatic nuisance species 
        through the northern reaches of the Upper Mississippi 
        River system;
            (4) submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
        a report on the results of the evaluation conducted 
        under paragraph (3); and
            (5) operate and maintain the project.
    (c) Requirement.--In conducting the study under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall take into consideration the 
feasibility of locating the dispersal barrier at the lock 
portion of the project at Lock and Dam 11 in the Upper 
Mississippi River basin.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $4,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5017. ESTUARY RESTORATION.

    (a) Purposes.--Section 102 of the Estuary Restoration Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2901) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting before the 
        semicolon at the end the following: ``by implementing a 
        coordinated Federal approach to estuary habitat 
        restoration activities, including the use of common 
        monitoring standards and a common system for tracking 
        restoration acreage'';
            (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and implement'' 
        after ``to develop''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``through 
        cooperative agreements'' after ``restoration 
        projects''.
    (b) Definition of Estuary Habitat Restoration Plan.--
Section 103(6)(A) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2902(6)(A)) is amended by striking ``Federal or State'' 
and inserting ``Federal, State, or regional''.
    (c) Estuary Habitat Restoration Program.--Section 104 of 
the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2903) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``through the 
        award of contracts and cooperative agreements'' after 
        ``assistance'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3)(A) by inserting ``or 
                State'' after ``Federal''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4)(B) by inserting ``or 
                approach'' after ``technology'';
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``Except'' and 
                        inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Except''; and
                            (ii) by adding at the end the 
                        following:
                    ``(B) Monitoring.--
                            ``(i) Costs.--The costs of 
                        monitoring an estuary habitat 
                        restoration project funded under this 
                        title may be included in the total cost 
                        of the estuary habitat restoration 
                        project.
                            ``(ii) Goals.--The goals of the 
                        monitoring shall be--
                                    ``(I) to measure the 
                                effectiveness of the 
                                restoration project; and
                                    ``(II) to allow adaptive 
                                management to ensure project 
                                success.'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``or 
                approach'' after ``technology''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3) by inserting 
                ``(including monitoring)'' after ``services'';
            (4) in subsection (f)(1)(B) by inserting ``long-
        term'' before ``maintenance''; and
            (5) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking ``In carrying'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--In carrying''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Small projects.--
                    ``(A) Small project defined.--In this 
                paragraph, the term `small project' means a 
                project carried out under this title with an 
                estimated Federal cost of less than $1,000,000.
                    ``(B) Delegation of project 
                implementation.--In carrying out this section, 
                the Secretary, on recommendation of the 
                Council, may delegate implementation of a small 
                project to--
                            ``(i) the Secretary of the Interior 
                        (acting through the Director of the 
                        United States Fish and Wildlife 
                        Service);
                            ``(ii) the Under Secretary for 
                        Oceans and Atmosphere of the Department 
                        of Commerce;
                            ``(iii) the Administrator of the 
                        Environmental Protection Agency; or
                            ``(iv) the Secretary of 
                        Agriculture.
                    ``(C) Funding.--A small project delegated 
                to the head of a Federal department or agency 
                under this paragraph may be carried out using 
                funds appropriated to the department or agency 
                under section 109(a)(1) or other funds 
                available to the department or agency.
                    ``(D) Agreements.--The head of a Federal 
                department or agency to which a small project 
                is delegated under this paragraph shall enter 
                into an agreement with the non-Federal interest 
                for the project generally in conformance with 
                the criteria in subsections (d) and (e). 
                Cooperative agreements may be used for any 
                delegated project to allow the non-Federal 
                interest to carry out the project on behalf of 
                the Federal agency.''.
    (d) Establishment of Estuary Habitat Restoration Council.--
Section 105(b) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2904(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the 
        end and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) cooperating in the implementation of the 
        strategy developed under section 106;
            ``(7) recommending standards for monitoring for 
        restoration projects and contribution of project 
        information to the database developed under section 
        107; and
            ``(8) otherwise using the respective authorities of 
        the Council members to carry out this title.''.
    (e) Monitoring of Estuary Habitat Restoration Projects.--
Section 107(d) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2906(d)) is amended by striking ``compile'' and 
inserting ``have general data compilation, coordination, and 
analysis responsibilities to carry out this title and in 
support of the strategy developed under this section, including 
compilation of''.
    (f) Reporting.--Section 108(a) of the Estuary Restoration 
Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2907(a)) is amended by striking ``At the 
end of the third and fifth fiscal years following the date of 
enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``Not later than 
September 30, 2008, and every 2 years thereafter''.
    (g) Funding.--Section 109(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
                (A) by striking ``to the Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking subparagraphs (A) through 
                (D) and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) to the Secretary, $25,000,000 for 
                each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
                    ``(B) to the Secretary of the Interior 
                (acting through the Director of the United 
                States Fish and Wildlife Service), $2,500,000 
                for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
                    ``(C) to the Under Secretary for Oceans and 
                Atmosphere of the Department of Commerce, 
                $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 
                through 2012;
                    ``(D) to the Administrator of the 
                Environmental Protection Agency, $2,500,000 for 
                each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012; and
                    ``(E) to the Secretary of Agriculture, 
                $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 
                through 2012.''; and
            (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and other information 
                compiled under section 107'' after ``this 
                title''; and
                    (B) by striking ``2005'' and inserting 
                ``2012''.
    (h) General Provisions.--Section 110 of the Estuary 
Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2909) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or contracts'' after 
                ``agreements''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, nongovernmental 
                organizations,'' after ``agencies''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (d) and (e).

SEC. 5018. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, RECOVERY, AND 
                    RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, MONTANA, 
                    NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND WYOMING.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the Missouri River Recovery Implementation 
        Committee to be established under subsection (b)(1), 
        shall conduct a study of the Missouri River and its 
        tributaries to determine actions required--
                    (A) to mitigate losses of aquatic and 
                terrestrial habitat;
                    (B) to recover federally listed species 
                under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
                U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (C) to restore the ecosystem to prevent 
                further declines among other native species.
            (2) Funding.--The study to be conducted under 
        paragraph (1) shall be funded using amounts made 
        available to carry out the Missouri River recovery and 
        mitigation plan authorized by section 601(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4143).
    (b) Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.--
            (1) Establishment.--Not later than 6 months after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        establish a committee to be known as the Missouri River 
        Recovery Implementation Committee (in this section 
        referred to as the ``Committee'').
            (2) Membership.--The Committee shall include 
        representatives from--
                    (A) Federal agencies;
                    (B) States located near the Missouri River 
                basin; and
                    (C) other appropriate entities, as 
                determined by the Secretary, including--
                            (i) water management and fish and 
                        wildlife agencies;
                            (ii) Indian tribes located near the 
                        Missouri River basin; and
                            (iii) nongovernmental stakeholders, 
                        which may include--
                                    (I) navigation interests;
                                    (II) irrigation interests;
                                    (III) flood control 
                                interests;
                                    (IV) fish, wildlife, and 
                                conservation organizations;
                                    (V) recreation interests; 
                                and
                                    (VI) power supply 
                                interests.
            (3) Duties.--The Committee shall--
                    (A) with respect to the study to be 
                conducted under subsection (a)(1), provide 
                guidance to the Secretary and any affected 
                Federal agency, State agency, or Indian tribe; 
                and
                    (B) provide guidance to the Secretary with 
                respect to the Missouri River recovery and 
                mitigation plan in existence on the date of 
                enactment of this Act, including 
                recommendations relating to--
                            (i) changes to the implementation 
                        strategy from the use of adaptive 
                        management;
                            (ii) coordination of the 
                        development of consistent policies, 
                        strategies, plans, programs, projects, 
                        activities, and priorities for the 
                        Missouri River recovery and mitigation 
                        plan;
                            (iii) exchange of information 
                        regarding programs, projects, and 
                        activities of the agencies and entities 
                        represented on the Committee to promote 
                        the goals of the Missouri River 
                        recovery and mitigation plan;
                            (iv) establishment of such working 
                        groups as the Committee determines to 
                        be necessary to assist in carrying out 
                        the duties of the Committee, including 
                        duties relating to public policy and 
                        scientific issues;
                            (v) facilitating the resolution of 
                        interagency and intergovernmental 
                        conflicts between entities represented 
                        on the Committee associated with the 
                        Missouri River recovery and mitigation 
                        plan;
                            (vi) coordination of scientific and 
                        other research associated with the 
                        Missouri River recovery and mitigation 
                        plan; and
                            (vii) annual preparation of a work 
                        plan and associated budget requests.
            (4) Recommendations and guidance.--In providing 
        recommendations and guidance from the Committee, the 
        members of the Committee may include dissenting 
        opinions.
            (5) Compensation; travel expenses.--
                    (A) Compensation.--Members of the Committee 
                shall not receive compensation from the 
                Secretary in carrying out the duties of the 
                Committee under this section.
                    (B) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses 
                incurred by a member of the Committee in 
                carrying out the duties of the Committee under 
                this section shall not be eligible for Federal 
                reimbursement.
    (c) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Committee.

SEC. 5019. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, 
                    MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of 
the 1997 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery 
From Natural Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, 
Including Those in Bosnia (Public Law 105-18; 111 Stat. 176), 
section 2.2 of the Susquehanna River Basin Compact to which 
consent was given by Public Law 91-575 (84 Stat. 1512), and 
section 2.2 of the Delaware River Basin Compact to which 
consent was given by Public Law 87-328 (75 Stat. 691), 
beginning in fiscal year 2002, and each fiscal year thereafter, 
the Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps of 
Engineers--
            (1) shall be--
                    (A) the ex officio United States member of 
                the Susquehanna River Basin Compact and the 
                Delaware River Basin Compact; and
                    (B) one of the 3 members appointed by the 
                President under the Potomac River Basin Compact 
                to which consent was given by Public Law 91-407 
                (84 Stat. 856);
            (2) shall serve without additional compensation; 
        and
            (3) may designate an alternate member in accordance 
        with the terms of those compacts.
    (b) Authorization To Allocate.--The Secretary shall 
allocate funds to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 
Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Interstate Commission 
on the Potomac River Basin to fulfill the equitable funding 
requirements of the respective interstate compacts.
    (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Delaware River 
Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Delaware River Basin Commission to 
        provide temporary water supply and conservation storage 
        at the Francis E. Walter Dam, Pennsylvania, for any 
        period during which the Commission has determined that 
        a drought warning or drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that 
        the cost for water supply and conservation storage 
        under paragraph (1) shall not exceed the incremental 
        operating costs associated with providing the storage.
    (d) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Susquehanna 
River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
        to provide temporary water supply and conservation 
        storage at Federal facilities operated by the Corps of 
        Engineers in the Susquehanna River basin for any period 
        for which the Commission has determined that a drought 
        warning or drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that 
        the cost for water supply and conservation storage 
        under paragraph (1) shall not exceed the incremental 
        operating costs associated with providing the storage.
    (e) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Potomac River 
Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Interstate Commission on the Potomac 
        River Basin to provide temporary water supply and 
        conservation storage at Federal facilities operated by 
        the Corps of Engineers in the Potomac River basin for 
        any period for which the Commission has determined that 
        a drought warning or drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that 
        the cost for water supply and conservation storage 
        under paragraph (1) shall not exceed the incremental 
        operating costs associated with providing the storage.

SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
                    PROGRAM.

    (a) Form of Assistance.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended 
by striking ``, and beneficial uses of dredged material'' and 
inserting ``, beneficial uses of dredged material, and 
restoration of submerged aquatic vegetation''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510(i) of 
such Act (110 Stat. 3761) is amended by striking 
``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''.

SEC. 5021. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND.

    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph 
        (4);
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the second sentence by striking 
                ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''; 
                and
                    (B) in the third sentence by striking 
                ``Such projects'' and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Inclusions.--Such projects'';
            (3) by striking paragraph (2)(D) (as redesignated 
        by paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection) and inserting 
        the following:
                    ``(D) the restoration and rehabilitation of 
                habitat for fish, including native oysters, in 
                the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries in 
                Virginia and Maryland, including--
                            ``(i) the construction of oyster 
                        bars and reefs;
                            ``(ii) the rehabilitation of 
                        existing marginal habitat;
                            ``(iii) the use of appropriate 
                        alternative substrate material in 
                        oyster bar and reef construction;
                            ``(iv) the construction and 
                        upgrading of oyster hatcheries; and
                            ``(v) activities relating to 
                        increasing the output of native oyster 
                        broodstock for seeding and monitoring 
                        of restored sites to ensure ecological 
                        success.
            ``(3) Restoration and rehabilitation activities.--
        The restoration and rehabilitation activities described 
        in paragraph (2)(D) shall be--
                    ``(A) for the purpose of establishing 
                permanent sanctuaries and harvest management 
                areas; and
                    ``(B) consistent with plans and strategies 
                for guiding the restoration of the Chesapeake 
                Bay oyster resource and fishery.''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Definition of ecological success.--In this 
        subsection, the term `ecological success' means--
                    ``(A) achieving a tenfold increase in 
                native oyster biomass by the year 2010, from a 
                1994 baseline; and
                    ``(B) the establishment of a sustainable 
                fishery as determined by a broad scientific and 
                economic consensus.''.

SEC. 5022. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT.

    The Secretary may participate with Federal, State, and 
local agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, regional 
researchers, and other interested parties to assess hypoxia in 
the Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 5023. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY STRATEGY 
                    EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM.

    The Secretary may participate in the Potomac River 
watershed assessment and tributary strategy evaluation and 
monitoring program to identify a series of resource management 
indicators to accurately monitor the effectiveness of the 
implementation of the agreed upon tributary strategies and 
other public policies that pertain to natural resource 
protection of the Potomac River watershed.

SEC. 5024. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY.

    (a) Standards.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Tennessee Valley 
Authority, and the Coast Guard, shall develop standards for the 
security of locks and dams, including the testing and 
certification of vessel exclusion barriers.
    (b) Site Surveys.--At the request of a lock or dam owner, 
the Secretary shall provide technical assistance, on a 
reimbursable basis, to improve lock or dam security.
    (c) Cooperative Agreement.--The Secretary may enter into a 
cooperative agreement with a nonprofit alliance of public and 
private organizations that has the mission of promoting safe 
waterways and seaports to carry out testing and certification 
activities, and to perform site surveys, under this section.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
                    RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL.

    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(16 U.S.C. 3301 note; 110 Stat. 3761; 113 Stat. 375) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(6) by striking 
        ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$25,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ``$1,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 5026. WAGE SURVEYS.

    Employees of the Corps of Engineers who are paid wages 
determined under the last undesignated paragraph under the 
heading ``Administrative Provisions'' of chapter V of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1982 (5 U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 
Stat. 832) shall be allowed, through appropriate employee 
organization representatives, to participate in wage surveys 
under such paragraph to the same extent as are prevailing rate 
employees under subsection (c)(2) of section 5343 of title 5, 
United States Code. Nothing in such section 5343 shall be 
construed to affect which agencies are to be surveyed under 
such paragraph.

SEC. 5027. REHABILITATION.

    The Secretary, at Federal expense and in an amount not to 
exceed $1,000,000, shall rehabilitate and improve the water-
related infrastructure and the transportation infrastructure 
for the historic property in the Anacostia River watershed 
located in the District of Columbia, including measures to 
address wet weather conditions. To carry out this section, the 
Secretary shall accept funds provided for such project under 
any other Federal program.

SEC. 5028. AUBURN, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary may provide technical assistance relating to 
water supply to Auburn, Alabama. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5029. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall design and 
construct the locally preferred plan for flood protection at 
Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama. In carrying out the 
project, the Secretary shall utilize, to the extent 
practicable, the existing detailed project report for the 
project prepared under the authority of section 205 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Participation by Non-Federal Interest.--The Secretary 
shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if 
the detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying 
such section is necessary to implement the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 5030. ALASKA.

    Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 369) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``environmental 
        restoration,'' after ``water supply and related 
        facilities,'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last 
        sentence;
            (3) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$45,000,000''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)), for any project carried out under this section, a non-
Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5031. BARROW, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, under section 117 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 
Stat. 2944), a nonstructural project for coastal erosion and 
storm damage prevention and reduction at Barrow, Alaska, 
including relocation of infrastructure.

SEC. 5032. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.

    (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--
            (1) Maintenance and repair.--The Secretary shall 
        assume responsibility for the long-term maintenance and 
        repair of the Lowell Creek tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
            (2) Duration of responsibilities.--The 
        responsibility of the Secretary for long-term 
        maintenance and repair of the tunnel shall continue 
        until an alternative method of flood diversion is 
        constructed and operational under this section, or 15 
        years after the date of enactment of this Act, 
        whichever is earlier.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine whether an alternative method of flood diversion in 
Lowell Canyon is feasible.
    (c) Construction.--
            (1) Alternative methods.--If the Secretary 
        determines under the study conducted under subsection 
        (b) that an alternative method of flood diversion in 
        Lowell Canyon is feasible, the Secretary shall carry 
        out the alternative method.
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of carrying out an alternative method under paragraph 
        (1) shall be the same as the Federal share of the cost 
        of the construction of the Lowell Creek tunnel.

SEC. 5033. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, 
necessary removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the 
entrance to the St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, 
Alaska, at a Federal cost of $2,000,000.

SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, the 
removal of the hazard to navigation on the Tanana River, 
Alaska, near the mouth of the Chena River, as described in the 
January 3, 2005, memorandum from the Commander, Seventeenth 
Coast Guard District, to the Corps of Engineers, Alaska 
District, Anchorage, Alaska.

SEC. 5035. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) General Navigation Features.--In carrying out the 
project for navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, authorized by 
section 101(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 279), the Secretary shall consider the dredging 
of the mooring basin and construction of the inner harbor 
facilities to be general navigation features for purposes of 
estimating the non-Federal share of project costs.
    (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the partnership agreement for the project to reflect the 
change required by subsection (a).

SEC. 5036. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation 
of authorized and completed levees on the White River between 
Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas, at a total estimated cost of 
$8,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,200,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $2,800,000.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the rehabilitation 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek reimbursement 
from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to the 
costs allocated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of 
such rehabilitation.

SEC. 5037. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, 
Des Arc, Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel scour 
along the White River threaten the existing project and whether 
the scour is a result of a design deficiency. If the Secretary 
determines that such conditions exist as a result of a 
deficiency, the Secretary shall carry out measures to eliminate 
the deficiency.

SEC. 5038. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the 
vicinity of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if 
the Secretary determines that the damage is the result of a 
Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a 
project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).

SEC. 5039. CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in California.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in California, 
including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
facilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity.
    (g) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of amounts made available to carry out this section may be used 
by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5040. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, 
                    STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--Unless the Secretary determines, by not 
later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
that the relocation of the portion of the project described in 
subsection (b)(2) would be injurious to the public interest, a 
non-Federal interest may reconstruct and relocate that portion 
of the project approximately 300 feet in a westerly direction.
    (b) Project Description.--
            (1) In general.--The project referred to in 
        subsection (a) is the project for flood control, 
        Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, 
        California, authorized by section 10 of the Flood 
        Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 902).
            (2) Specific description.--The portion of the 
        project to be reconstructed and relocated is that 
        portion consisting of approximately 5.34 acres of dry 
        land levee beginning at a point N. 2203542.3167, E. 
        6310930.1385, thence running west about 59.99 feet to a 
        point N. 2203544.6562, E. 6310870.1468, thence running 
        south about 3,874.99 feet to a point N. 2199669.8760, 
        E. 6310861.7956, thence running east about 60.00 feet 
        to a point N. 2199668.8026, E. 6310921.7900, thence 
        running north about 3,873.73 feet to the point of 
        origin.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
reconstructing and relocating the portion of the project 
described in subsection (b)(2) shall be 100 percent.

SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, 
                in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost 
                of planning and design work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
        subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
        this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
        paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
                    MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

    Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end 
the following: ``All planning, study, design, and construction 
on the project shall be carried out by the office of the 
district engineer, San Francisco, California.''.

SEC. 5043. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water 
quality degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to 
determine if the degradation is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that the 
degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, the 
Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate the degradation 
at Federal expense.

SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 336) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, 
                in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design and construction 
                work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                for the project before the date of the 
                partnership agreement for the project.
                    ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-
                Federal interest may provide any portion of the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
                the form of in-kind services and materials.''; 
                and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
        subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
        this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
        paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5045. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 
2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 
2763A-224) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$28,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 5046. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, 
                    CALIFORNIA.

    The third sentence of section 102(c)(4) of the Marine 
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 
1412(c)(4)) is amended by striking ``January 1, 2003'' and 
inserting ``January 1, 2011''.

SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``water'' the following: 
        ``and wastewater''; and
            (2) by striking ``$14,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$24,500,000''.

SEC. 5048. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(c)(27) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(27) Los osos, california.--Wastewater 
        infrastructure, Los Osos, California.''.

SEC. 5049. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Cooperative Program.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall participate 
        with appropriate State and local agencies in the 
        implementation of a cooperative program to improve and 
        manage fisheries and aquatic habitat conditions in Pine 
        Flat Reservoir and in the 14-mile reach of the Kings 
        River immediately below Pine Flat Dam, California, in a 
        manner that--
                    (A) provides for long-term aquatic resource 
                enhancement; and
                    (B) avoids adverse effects on water storage 
                and water rights holders.
            (2) Goals and principles.--The cooperative program 
        described in paragraph (1) shall be carried out--
                    (A) substantially in accordance with the 
                goals and principles of the document entitled 
                ``Kings River Fisheries Management Program 
                Framework Agreement'' and dated May 29, 1999, 
                between the California Department of Fish and 
                Game and the Kings River Water Association and 
                the Kings River Conservation District; and
                    (B) in cooperation with the parties to that 
                agreement.
    (b) Participation by Secretary.--
            (1) In general.--In furtherance of the goals of the 
        agreement described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary 
        shall participate in the planning, design, and 
        construction of projects and pilot projects on the 
        Kings River and its tributaries to enhance aquatic 
        habitat and water availability for fisheries purposes 
        (including maintenance of a trout fishery) in 
        accordance with flood control operations, water rights, 
        and beneficial uses in existence as of the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Projects.--Projects referred to in paragraph 
        (1) may include--
                    (A) projects to construct or improve 
                pumping, conveyance, and storage facilities to 
                enhance water transfers; and
                    (B) projects to carry out water exchanges 
                and create opportunities to use floodwater 
                within and downstream of Pine Flat Reservoir.
    (c) No Authorization of Certain Dam-Related Projects.--
Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any 
project for the raising of Pine Flat Dam or the construction of 
a multilevel intake structure at Pine Flat Dam.
    (d) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, 
studies in existence on the date of enactment of this Act, 
including data and environmental documentation in the document 
entitled ``Final Feasibility Report and Report of the Chief of 
Engineers for Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat 
Restoration'' and dated July 19, 2002.
    (e) Credit for Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--The 
Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of construction of any project under subsection (b) the value, 
regardless of the date of acquisition, of any land, easements, 
rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, or relocations 
provided by the non-Federal interest for use in carrying out 
the project.
    (f) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, 
repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of projects carried out 
under this section shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. Such 
sums shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 5050. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN GABRIEL 
                    BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation and 
coordination with appropriate Federal, State, and local 
entities, shall develop a comprehensive plan for the management 
of water resources in the Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino 
Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, California. The Secretary may 
carry out activities identified in the comprehensive plan to 
demonstrate practicable alternatives for water resources 
management.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
the cost of operation and maintenance of any measures 
constructed under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 5051. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Port of San Francisco, California, may carry out the project 
for repair and removal, as appropriate, of Piers 30-32, 35, 36, 
70 (including Wharves 7 and 8), and 80 in San Francisco, 
California, substantially in accordance with the Port's 
redevelopment plan.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to 
be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5052. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

    (a) Area To Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--
Unless the Secretary finds, after consultation with local and 
regional public officials (including local and regional public 
planning organizations), that the proposed projects to be 
undertaken within the boundaries of the portion of the San 
Francisco, California, waterfront area described in subsection 
(b) are not in the public interest, such portion is declared to 
be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The 
portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area 
referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Beginning at the 
intersection of the northeasterly prolongation of that portion 
of the northwesterly line of Bryant Street lying between Beale 
Street and Main Street with the southwesterly line of Spear 
Street, which intersection lies on the line of jurisdiction of 
the San Francisco Port Commission; following thence southerly 
along said line of jurisdiction as described in the State of 
California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended 
in 1961, to its intersection with the southeasterly line of 
Townsend Street; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly 
line of Townsend Street, to its intersection with a line that 
is parallel and distant 10 feet southerly from the existing 
southern boundary of Pier 40 produced; thence easterly along 
said parallel line, to its point of intersection with the 
United States Government Pierhead line; thence northerly along 
said Pierhead line to its intersection with a line parallel 
with, and distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing easterly 
boundary line of Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said 
parallel line and its northerly prolongation, to a point of 
intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 10 feet 
northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 30-32; 
thence westerly along last said parallel line to its 
intersection with the United States Government Pierhead line; 
thence northerly along said Pierhead line, to its intersection 
aforementioned northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced 
northeasterly; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly 
line of Bryant Street produced to the point of beginning.
    (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those 
parts of the area described in subsection (b) that are or will 
be bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent 
structures and does not affect the applicability of any Federal 
statute or regulation applicable to such parts the day before 
the date of enactment of this Act, including sections 9 and 10 
of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 and 403; 30 Stat. 
1151), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation 
Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of 
enactment of this Act, any area or part thereof described in 
subsection (b) is not bulkheaded or filled or occupied by 
permanent structures, including marina facilities, in 
accordance with the requirements set out in subsection (c), or 
if work in connection with any activity permitted in subsection 
(c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance of such 
permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for such area 
or part thereof shall expire.

SEC. 5053. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN MARSH 
                    ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) San Pablo Bay Watershed, California.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall complete work, 
        as expeditiously as possible, on the ongoing San Pablo 
        Bay watershed, California, study to determine the 
        feasibility of opportunities for restoring, preserving, 
        and protecting the San Pablo Bay watershed.
            (2) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2008, the 
        Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
        results of the study.
    (b) Suisun Marsh, California.--The Secretary shall conduct 
a comprehensive study to determine the feasibility of 
opportunities for restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
Suisun Marsh, California.
    (c) San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh Watershed Critical 
Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in 
        critical restoration projects that will produce, 
        consistent with Federal programs, projects, and 
        activities, immediate and substantial ecosystem 
        restoration, preservation, and protection benefits in 
        the following sub-watersheds of the San Pablo and 
        Suisun Bay Marsh watersheds:
                    (A) The tidal areas of the Petaluma River, 
                Napa-Sonoma Marsh.
                    (B) The shoreline of West Contra Costa 
                County.
                    (C) Novato Creek.
                    (D) Suisun Marsh.
                    (E) Gallinas-Miller Creek.
            (2) Types of assistance.--Participation in critical 
        restoration projects under this subsection may include 
        assistance for planning, design, or construction.
    (d) Credit.--In accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the Secretary shall 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of construction 
of a project under this section--
            (1) the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-
        way, dredged material disposal areas, or relocations 
        provided by the non-Federal interest for carrying out 
        the project, regardless of the date of acquisition;
            (2) funds received from the CALFED Bay-Delta 
        program; and
            (3) the cost of the studies, design, and 
        construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest before the date of the partnership agreement 
        for the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5054. ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may construct a project for 
flood control and environmental restoration, St. Helena, 
California, substantially in accordance with the plan for the 
St. Helena comprehensive flood protection project dated 2006 
and described in the addendum dated June 27, 2006, to the 
report prepared by the city of St. Helena entitled ``City of 
St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection Project, Final 
Environmental Impact Report'', and dated January 2004, if the 
Secretary determines that the plans and designs for the project 
are feasible.
    (b) Cost.--The total cost of the project to be constructed 
pursuant to subsection (a) shall be $30,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $10,500,000.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The non-Federal interest shall be 
reimbursed for any work performed by the non-Federal interest 
for the project described in subsection (a) that is in excess 
of the required non-Federal contribution toward the total cost 
of the project, if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the 
feasibility of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee 
extensions on the Upper Calaveras River element of the project 
for flood control, Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, 
carried out under section 211(f)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to determine the 
eligibility of such elements for reimbursement under section 
211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the 
reevaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not 
reject a feasibility determination based on one or more of the 
policies of the Corps of Engineers concerning the frequency of 
flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff.
    (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the 
elements referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary 
shall reimburse, subject to appropriations, the non-Federal 
interest under section 211 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 for the Federal share of the cost of such elements.

SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
                    MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
definitions apply:
            (1) Rio grande compact.--The term ``Rio Grande 
        Compact'' means the compact approved by Congress under 
        the Act of May 31, 1939 (53 Stat. 785), and ratified by 
        the States.
            (2) Rio grande basin.--The term ``Rio Grande 
        Basin'' means the Rio Grande (including all tributaries 
        and their headwaters) located--
                    (A) in the State of Colorado, from the Rio 
                Grande Reservoir, near Creede, Colorado, to the 
                New Mexico State border;
                    (B) in the State of New Mexico, from the 
                Colorado State border downstream to the Texas 
                State border; and
                    (C) in the State of Texas, from the New 
                Mexico State border to the southern terminus of 
                the Rio Grande at the Gulf of Mexico.
            (3) States.--The term ``States'' means the States 
        of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas.
    (b) Program Authority.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, in 
        the Rio Grande Basin--
                    (A) a program for the planning, 
                construction, and evaluation of measures for 
                fish and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and 
                enhancement; and
                    (B) implementation of a long-term 
                monitoring, computerized data inventory and 
                analysis, applied research, and adaptive 
                management program.
            (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and 
        not later than December 31 of every sixth year 
        thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Secretary of the Interior and the States, shall submit 
        to Congress a report that--
                    (A) contains an evaluation of the programs 
                described in paragraph (1);
                    (B) describes the accomplishments of each 
                program;
                    (C) provides updates of a systemic habitat 
                needs assessment; and
                    (D) identifies any needed adjustments in 
                the authorization of the programs.
    (c) State and Local Consultation and Cooperative Effort.--
For the purpose of ensuring the coordinated planning and 
implementation of the programs described in subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with the States, and other appropriate 
        entities in the States, the rights and interests of 
        which might be affected by specific program activities; 
        and
            (2) enter into an interagency agreement with the 
        Secretary of the Interior to provide for the direct 
        participation of, and transfer of funds to, the United 
        States Fish and Wildlife Service and any other agency 
        or bureau of the Department of the Interior for the 
        planning, design, implementation, and evaluation of 
        those programs.
    (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The costs of operation and 
maintenance of a project located on Federal land, or land owned 
or operated by a State or local government, shall be borne by 
the Federal, State, or local agency that has jurisdiction over 
fish and wildlife activities on the land.
    (e) Effect on Other Law.--
            (1) Water law.--Nothing in this section shall be 
        construed to preempt any State water law.
            (2) Compacts and decrees.--In carrying out this 
        section, the Secretary shall comply with the Rio Grande 
        Compact, and any applicable court decrees or Federal 
        and State laws, affecting water or water rights in the 
        Rio Grande Basin.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
$15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.

SEC. 5057. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
                    CONNECTICUT.

    The western breakwater for the project for navigation, New 
Haven Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of 
the Act of September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 428), shall be known 
and designated as the ``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.

SEC. 5058. STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and 
recreation components of the Mill River and Long Island Sound 
revitalization project, Stamford, Connecticut.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5059. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND 
                    VIRGINIA.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical 
assistance to the Secretary of Agriculture for use in carrying 
out the Conservation Corridor Demonstration Program established 
under subtitle G of title II of the Farm Security and Rural 
Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 note; 116 Stat. 275).
    (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water 
resources projects in the States on the Delmarva Peninsula, the 
Secretary shall coordinate and integrate those projects, to the 
maximum extent practicable, with any activities carried out to 
implement a conservation corridor plan approved by the 
Secretary of Agriculture under section 2602 of the Farm 
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 note; 
116 Stat. 275).

SEC. 5060. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.

    (a) Comprehensive Action Plan.--Not later than one year 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in 
coordination with the Mayor of the District of Columbia, the 
Governor of Maryland, the county executives of Montgomery 
County and Prince George's County, Maryland, and other 
interested entities, shall develop and make available to the 
public a 10-year comprehensive action plan to provide for the 
restoration and protection of the ecological integrity of the 
Anacostia River and its tributaries.
    (b) Public Availability.--On completion of the 
comprehensive action plan under subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall make the plan available to the public, including on the 
Internet.

SEC. 5061. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA.

    (a) East Central and Northeast Florida Region Defined.--In 
this section, the term ``East Central and Northeast Florida 
Region'' means Flagler County, St. Johns County, Putman County 
(east of the St. Johns River), Seminole County, Volusia County, 
the towns of Winter Park, Maitland, and Palatka, Florida.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in the East Central and Northeast Florida Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in the East 
Central and Northeast Florida Region, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and 
related facilities, environmental restoration, and surface 
water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5062. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

    Section 109 of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 
(enacted into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-222) 
is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e)(2) the 
        following:
                    ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of 
                the partnership agreement.--The Secretary shall 
                credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
                of the project--
                            ``(i) in accordance with section 
                        221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
                        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of 
                        construction work carried out by the 
                        non-Federal interest for the project 
                        before the date of the partnership 
                        agreement for the project; and
                            ``(ii) the cost of land acquisition 
                        carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                        for projects to be carried out under 
                        this section.''; and
            (2) in subsection (f) by striking ``$100,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$100,000,000, of which not more than 
        $15,000,000 may be used to provide planning, design, 
        and construction assistance to the Florida Keys 
        Aqueduct Authority for a water treatment plant, Florida 
        City, Florida''.

SEC. 5063. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake 
Worth bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, 
at an estimated total cost of $9,000,000.

SEC. 5064. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION 
                    PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with, by 
providing technical, planning, and construction assistance to, 
the city of Roswell, Georgia, as the non-Federal interest and 
coordinator with other local governments in the Big Creek 
watershed, Georgia, to assess the quality and quantity of water 
resources, conduct comprehensive watershed management planning, 
develop and implement water efficiency technologies and 
programs, and plan, design, and construct water resource 
facilities to restore the watershed.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 to carry out 
this section.

SEC. 5065. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
establish a program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in the Metropolitan North Georgia Water 
Planning District.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in north Georgia, 
including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
facilities, elimination or control of combined sewer overflows, 
water supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, 
and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section, in an amount not to 
                exceed 6 percent of the total construction 
                costs of the project, the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
                project before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.

SEC. 5066. SAVANNAH, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--After completion of a Savannah Riverfront 
plan, the Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, recreation, navigation, and flood damage reduction 
components of the plan.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in 
the vicinity of Savannah, Georgia, including the Georgia Ports 
Authority, the city of Savannah, and Camden County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND 
                    WYOMING.

    Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 
118 Stat. 440) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading by striking ``AND RURAL 
        UTAH'' and inserting ``RURAL UTAH, AND WYOMING'';
            (2) in subsections (b) and (c) by striking ``and 
        rural Utah'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``rural Utah, and Wyoming''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural Nevada, 
$25,000,000 for each of Montana and New Mexico, $55,000,000 for 
Idaho, $50,000,000 for rural Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming. 
Such sums shall remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 5068. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek 
Recreation Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management 
Plan, dated October 2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation Area, 
Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner County, Idaho.

SEC. 5069. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
inundation areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, 
Illinois.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
accurately show the flood inundation of each property by flood 
risk in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a high 
resolution format and shall be made available to all flood 
prone areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois, 
in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
Federal interests for the project shall work with the 
Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
ensure the validity of the maps developed under the project for 
flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to modify the prioritization of map 
updates or the substantive requirements of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency flood map modernization program 
authorized by section 1360 of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

SEC. 5070. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI FLOOD PROTECTION 
                    PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
reconstruction of an eligible flood control project if the 
Secretary determines that such reconstruction is not required 
as a result of improper operation and maintenance of the 
project by the non-Federal interest.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for 
the reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by 
this section shall be the same non-Federal share that was 
applicable to construction of the project. The non-Federal 
interest shall be responsible for operation and maintenance and 
repair of a project for which reconstruction is undertaken 
under this section.
    (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means 
addressing major project deficiencies caused by long-term 
degradation of the foundation, construction materials, or 
engineering systems or components of the project, the results 
of which render the project at risk of not performing in 
compliance with its authorized project purposes. In addressing 
such deficiencies, the Secretary may incorporate current design 
standards and efficiency improvements, including the 
replacement of obsolete mechanical and electrical components at 
pumping stations, if such incorporation does not significantly 
change the scope, function, and purpose of the project as 
authorized.
    (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control 
projects are eligible for reconstruction under this section:
            (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, 
        Illinois.
            (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage 
        District, Illinois.
            (3) Prairie Du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, 
        including Fish Lake Drainage and Levee District, 
        Illinois.
            (4) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, 
        Illinois.
            (5) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois.
            (6) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alexander 
        County, Illinois.
            (7) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, 
        Illinois.
            (8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, 
        Shawneetown, Old Shawneetown, Golconda, Rosiclare, 
        Harrisburg, and Reevesville, Illinois.
            (9) City of St. Louis, Missouri.
            (10) Missouri River Levee Drainage District, 
        Missouri.
    (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project 
authorized by this section shall not be considered a separable 
element of the project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5071. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

    (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is 
amended by striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
    (b) Maximum Federal Share.--Section 519(c)(3) of such Act 
(114 Stat. 2654) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$20,000,000''.
    (c) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 
Stat. 2655) is amended by inserting before the period at the 
end of the first sentence ``if such services are provided not 
more than 5 years before the date of initiation of the project 
or activity''.
    (d) Monitoring.--Section 519 of such Act (114 Stat. 2654) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall develop an Illinois 
River basin monitoring program to support the plan developed 
under subsection (b). Data collected under the monitoring 
program shall incorporate data provided by the State of 
Illinois and shall be publicly accessible through electronic 
means, including on the Internet.''.

SEC. 5072. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO SHORELINE, 
                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
        third-party review of the Promontory Point feature of 
        the project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
        erosion protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from 
        Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State line, 
        authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), at a cost not 
        to exceed $450,000.
            (2) Joint review.--The Buffalo and Seattle 
        Districts of the Corps of Engineers shall jointly 
        conduct the review under paragraph (1).
            (3) Standards.--The review under paragraph (1) 
        shall be based on the standards under part 68 of title 
        36, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor 
        regulation).
    (b) Contributions.--The Secretary may accept funds from a 
State or political subdivision of a State to conduct the review 
under paragraph (1).
    (c) Treatment.--The review under paragraph (1) shall not be 
considered to be an element of the project referred to in 
paragraph (1).
    (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to affect the authorization for the project referred 
to in paragraph (1).

SEC. 5073. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.

    (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``Kaskaskia River Basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, 
Illinois, its backwaters, its side channels, and all 
tributaries, including their watersheds, draining into the 
Kaskaskia River.
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
        expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for 
        the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting 
        the Kaskaskia River Basin.
            (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of 
        new technologies and innovative approaches--
                    (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a 
                transportation corridor;
                    (B) to improve water quality within the 
                entire Kaskaskia River Basin;
                    (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve 
                habitat for plants and wildlife;
                    (D) to ensure aquatic integrity of side 
                channels and backwaters and their connectivity 
                with the mainstem river;
                    (E) to increase economic opportunity for 
                agriculture and business communities; and
                    (F) to reduce the impacts of flooding to 
                communities and landowners.
            (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan 
        shall include such features as are necessary to provide 
        for--
                    (A) the development and implementation of a 
                program for sediment removal technology, 
                sediment characterization, sediment transport, 
                and beneficial uses of sediment;
                    (B) the development and implementation of a 
                program for the planning, conservation, 
                evaluation, and construction of measures for 
                fish and wildlife habitat conservation and 
                rehabilitation, and stabilization and 
                enhancement of land and water resources in the 
                Kaskaskia River Basin;
                    (C) the development and implementation of a 
                long-term resource monitoring program for the 
                Basin;
                    (D) a conveyance study of the Kaskaskia 
                River floodplain from Vandalia, Illinois, to 
                Carlyle Lake to determine the impacts of 
                existing and future waterfowl improvements on 
                flood stages, including detailed surveys and 
                mapping information to ensure proper hydraulic 
                and hydrological analysis;
                    (E) the development and implementation of a 
                computerized inventory and analysis system for 
                the Basin;
                    (F) the development and implementation of a 
                systemic plan for the Basin to reduce flood 
                impacts by means of ecosystem restoration 
                projects; and
                    (G) the study and design of necessary 
                measures to reduce ongoing headcutting and 
                restore the aquatic environment of the Basin 
                that has been degraded by the headcutting that 
                has occurred above the existing grade control 
                structure.
            (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be 
        developed by the Secretary in consultation with 
        appropriate Federal agencies, the State of Illinois, 
        and the Kaskaskia River Watershed Association.
            (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
        shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
        a report containing the comprehensive plan.
            (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After 
        submission of a report under paragraph (5), the 
        Secretary shall conduct studies and analyses of 
        projects related to the comprehensive plan that are 
        appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
    (c) General Provisions.--
            (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities 
        under this section, the Secretary's recommendations 
        shall be consistent with applicable State water quality 
        standards.
            (2) Public participation.--In developing the 
        comprehensive plan under subsection (b), the Secretary 
        shall implement procedures to facilitate public 
        participation, including providing advance notice of 
        meetings, providing adequate opportunity for public 
        input and comment, maintaining appropriate records, and 
        making a record of the proceedings of meetings 
        available for public inspection.
    (d) Critical Projects and Initiatives.--If the Secretary, 
in cooperation with appropriate Federal agencies and the State 
of Illinois, determines that a project or initiative for the 
Kaskaskia River Basin will produce independent, immediate, and 
substantial benefits, the Secretary may proceed with the 
implementation of the project.
    (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities 
carried out under this section with ongoing Federal and State 
programs, projects, and activities, including the following:
            (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
            (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State 
        of Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of 
        the Illinois department of natural resources.
            (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices 
        Program and the Livestock Management Facilities Act 
        administered by the Illinois department of agriculture.
            (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural 
        Resources Conservation Service.
            (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by 
        the Illinois environmental protection agency.
            (6) Other programs that may be developed by the 
        State of Illinois or the Federal Government, or that 
        are carried out by nonprofit organizations, to carry 
        out the objectives of the Kaskaskia River Basin 
        Comprehensive Plan.
    (f) In-Kind Services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of 
in-kind services provided by the non-Federal interest for an 
activity carried out under this section toward not more than 80 
percent of the non-Federal share of the cost of the activity. 
In-kind services shall include all State funds expended on 
programs that accomplish the goals of this section, as 
determined by the Secretary. The programs may include the 
Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other 
appropriate programs carried out in the Kaskaskia River Basin.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $20,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5074. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS.

    (a) Southwest Illinois Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Southwest Illinois'' means the counties of Madison, St. 
Clair, Monroe, Randolph, Perry, Franklin, Jackson, Union, 
Alexander, Pulaski, and Williamson, Illinois.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in Southwest Illinois.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in Southwest 
Illinois, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of a project that is the subject of an 
                agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal 
                share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5075. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.

    Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 335; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$100,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, 
                in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of planning and design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
                project before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
        subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
        this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
        paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5076. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
inundation areas in the State of Iowa, along the Missouri 
River.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
accurately portray the flood hazard areas in the floodplain. 
The maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and 
shall be made available to the State of Iowa in an electronic 
format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
Federal interests for the project shall work with the 
Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
ensure the validity of the maps developed under the project for 
flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to modify the prioritization of map 
updates or the substantive requirements of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency flood map modernization program 
authorized by section 1360 of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 5077. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall complete a feasibility report for 
rehabilitation of the project for flood damage reduction, 
Paducah, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control 
Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary may 
carry out the project at a total cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 5078. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5079. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY.

    Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
            ``(41) Winchester, kentucky.--Wastewater 
        infrastructure, Winchester, Kentucky.''.

SEC. 5080. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.

    Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by 
striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.

SEC. 5081. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of a dredged 
material management plan for the Calcasieu Ship Channel, 
Louisiana, and may take interim measures to increase the 
capacity of existing disposal areas, or to construct new 
confined or beneficial use disposal areas, for the channel.

SEC. 5082. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN REGION, 
                    LOUISIANA.

    (a) East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region 
Defined.--In this section, the term ``East Atchafalaya Basin 
and Amite River Basin Region'' means the following parishes and 
municipalities in the State of Louisiana: Ascension, East Baton 
Rouge, East Feliciana, Iberville, Livingston, Pointe Coupee, 
St. Helena, West Baton Rouge, and West Feliciana.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin 
Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in the East 
Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water 
supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of a project that is the subject of an 
                agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal 
                share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5083. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT, LOUISIANA.

    Not later than July 1, 2008, the Secretary shall--
            (1) issue a final environmental impact statement 
        relating to the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock 
        project, Louisiana; and
            (2) develop and maintain a transportation 
        mitigation program relating to that project in 
        coordination with--
                    (A) St. Bernard Parish;
                    (B) Orleans Parish;
                    (C) the Old Arabi Neighborhood Association; 
                and
                    (D) other interested parties.

SEC. 5084. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    For purposes of carrying out section 121 of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273), the Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, basin stakeholders conference 
convened by the Environmental Protection Agency, National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and United States 
Geological Survey on February 25, 2002, shall be treated as 
being a management conference convened under section 320 of 
such Act (33 U.S.C. 1330).

SEC. 5085. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Definition of Southeast Louisiana Region.--In this 
section, the term ``Southeast Louisiana Region'' means any of 
the following parishes and municipalities in the State of 
Louisiana:
            (1) Orleans.
            (2) Jefferson.
            (3) St. Tammany.
            (4) Tangipahoa.
            (5) St. Bernard.
            (6) St. Charles.
            (7) St. John.
            (8) Plaquemines.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in the Southeast Louisiana Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in the Southeast 
Louisiana Region, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
protection and development (including projects to improve water 
quality in the Lake Pontchartrain basin).
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of amounts made available to carry out this section may be used 
by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $17,000,000.

SEC. 5086. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Modification of Study.--The study for the project for 
waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, and 
enhancement, Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, 
Louisiana, being carried out under Committee Resolution 2570 of 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives adopted July 23, 1998, is modified to add 
West Feliciana Parish and East Baton Rouge Parish to the 
geographic scope of the study.
    (b) Construction.--The Secretary may, upon completion of 
the study, participate in the ecosystem restoration, 
navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation components 
of the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of design work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
for the project before the date of the partnership agreement 
for the project.
    (d) Expedited Consideration.--Section 517(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge, West 
        Feliciana, and East Baton Rouge Parishes, Louisiana, 
        project for waterfront and riverine preservation, 
        restoration, and enhancement modifications.''.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 5087. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
nonstructural flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration 
at Charlestown, Maryland.
    (b) Land Acquisition.--The flood damage reduction component 
of the project may include the acquisition of private property 
from willing sellers.
    (c) Justification.--Any nonstructural flood damage 
reduction project to be carried out under this section that 
will result in the conversion of property to use for ecosystem 
restoration and wildlife habitat shall be justified based on 
national ecosystem restoration benefits.
    (d) Use of Acquired Property.--Property acquired under this 
section shall be maintained in public ownership for ecosystem 
restoration and wildlife habitat.
    (e) Ability to Pay.--In determining the appropriate non-
Federal cost share for the project, the Secretary shall 
determine the ability of Cecil County, Maryland, to participate 
as a cost-sharing non-Federal interest in accordance with 
section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5088. ST. MARY'S RIVER, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the project 
for shoreline protection, St. Mary's River, Maryland, under 
section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g).
    (b) Use of Funds.--In carrying out the project under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall use funds made available 
for such project under Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103).

SEC. 5089. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

    The Secretary may cooperate with Massachusetts in the 
management and long-term monitoring of aquatic dredged material 
disposal sites within the State and is authorized to accept 
funds from the State to carry out such activities.

SEC. 5090. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the 
vicinity of the project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, 
Ontonagon County, Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the 
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and reauthorized 
by section 363 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3730), to determine if the damage is the result of a 
Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines 
that the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, 
the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage 
under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
U.S.C. 426i).

SEC. 5091. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for 
emergency streambank protection along the Red Lake River in 
Crookston, Minnesota, and, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project 
under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
701r); except that the maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project shall be $6,500,000.

SEC. 5092. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Project Description.--Section 219(f)(61) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is 
amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``and 
        kathio township'' and inserting ``, crow wing county, 
        mille lacs county, mille lacs indian reservation, and 
        kathio township'';
            (2) by striking ``$11,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$17,000,000'';
            (3) by inserting ``, Crow Wing County, Mille Lacs 
        County, Mille Lacs Indian Reservation established by 
        the treaty of February 22, 1855 (10 Stat. 1165),'' 
        after ``Garrison''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following: ``Such 
        assistance shall be provided directly to the Garrison-
        Kathio-West Mille Lacs Lake Sanitary District, 
        Minnesota, except for assistance provided directly to 
        the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe at the discretion of the 
        Secretary.''.
    (b) Procedures.--In carrying out the project authorized by 
such section 219(f)(61), the Secretary may use the cost sharing 
and contracting procedures available to the Secretary under 
section 569 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 368).

SEC. 5093. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage 
reduction, Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, Itasca County, 
Minnesota, without regard to normal policy considerations.

SEC. 5094. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
Minneapolis by quitclaim deed and without consideration all 
right, title, and interest of the United States to the property 
known as the War Department (Fort Snelling Interceptor) Tunnel 
in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    (b) Applicability of Property Screening Provisions.--
Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
to the conveyance under this section.

SEC. 5095. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Section 569 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Benton, 
        Sherburne,'' and inserting ``Beltrami, Hubbard, 
        Wadena,'';
            (2) by striking the last sentence of subsection 
        (e)(3)(B);
            (3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)), for any project carried out under this section, a non-
Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.'';
            (4) in subsection (h) by striking ``$40,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$54,000,000''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.
    (b) Biwabik, Minnesota.--The Secretary shall reimburse the 
non-Federal interest for the project for environmental 
infrastructure, Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out under section 
569 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
368), for planning, design, and construction costs that were 
incurred by the non-Federal interest with respect to the 
project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project and that were in excess of the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project if the Secretary determines that the costs 
are appropriate.

SEC. 5096. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the general 
reevaluation report, authorized by section 438 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2640), for the 
project for flood protection, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 
Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives to the Twin Valley Lake 
feature, and upon the completion of such report, shall 
construct the project at a total cost of $20,000,000.

SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking 
``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$110,000,000''.

SEC. 5098. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI.

    In carrying out projects for the protection, restoration, 
and creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats 
located in Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, 
Mississippi, under section 204 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the Secretary shall 
accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
projects in the form of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 5099. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS.

    As a part of the operation and maintenance of the project 
for the Mississippi River (Regulating Works), between the Ohio 
and Missouri Rivers, Missouri and Illinois, authorized by the 
first section of an Act entitled ``Making appropriations for 
the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public 
works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 630), the Secretary may carry out 
activities necessary to restore and protect fish and wildlife 
habitat in the middle Mississippi River system. Such activities 
may include modification of navigation training structures, 
modification and creation of side channels, modification and 
creation of islands, and studies and analysis necessary to 
apply adaptive management principles in design of future work.

SEC. 5100. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 337) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``a project'' and inserting 
        ``projects'';
            (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$35,000,000''; and
            (3) by inserting ``and St. Louis County'' before 
        ``, Missouri''.

SEC. 5101. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction 
components of the St. Louis Regional Greenways Proposal of the 
Metropolitan Park and Recreation District, St. Louis, Missouri, 
dated March 31, 2004.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in 
the vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri, including the Metropolitan 
Park and Recreation District, the city of St. Louis, St. Louis 
County, and St. Charles County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5102. MISSOULA, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the Clark Fork River Revitalization Project, 
Missoula, Montana.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5103. ST. MARY PROJECT, GLACIER COUNTY, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
Bureau of Reclamation, shall conduct all necessary studies, 
develop an emergency response plan, provide technical and 
planning and design assistance, and rehabilitate and construct 
the St. Mary Diversion and Conveyance Works project located 
within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet Reservation in 
the State of Montana, at a total cost of $153,000,000.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the total cost of 
the project under this section shall be 75 percent.
    (c) Participation by Blackfeet Tribe and Fort Belknap 
Indian Community.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), no construction shall be carried out under this 
        section until the earlier of--
                    (A) the date on which Congress approves the 
                reserved water rights settlements of the 
                Blackfeet Tribe and the Fort Belknap Indian 
                Community; and
                    (B) January 1, 2011.
            (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with 
        respect to construction relating to--
                    (A) standard operation and maintenance; or
                    (B) emergency repairs to ensure water 
                transportation or the protection of life and 
                property.
            (3) Requirement.--The Blackfeet Tribe shall be a 
        participant in all phases of the project authorized by 
        this section.

SEC. 5104. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with and 
provide assistance to the Lower Platte River natural resources 
districts in the State of Nebraska to serve as non-Federal 
interests with respect to--
            (1) conducting comprehensive watershed planning in 
        the natural resource districts;
            (2) assessing water resources in the natural 
        resource districts; and
            (3) providing project feasibility planning, design, 
        and construction assistance for water resource and 
        watershed management in the natural resource districts, 
        including projects for environmental restoration and 
        flood damage reduction.
    (b) Funding.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of carrying out an activity described in subsection 
        (a)(1) shall be 75 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of carrying out an activity described in 
        subsection (a) may be provided in cash or in kind.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
$12,000,000.

SEC. 5105. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``design'' and inserting 
                ``planning, design,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Hackensack Meadowlands 
                Development'' and all that follows through 
                ``Plan for'' and inserting ``New Jersey 
                Meadowlands Commission for the development of 
                an environmental improvement program for'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading by striking 
                ``Required'';
                    (B) by striking ``shall'' and inserting 
                ``may'';
                    (C) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting 
                the following:
            ``(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant 
        wetlands and aquatic habitat that contribute to the 
        Meadowlands ecosystem.'';
                    (D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and 
                aquatic habitat'' before the period at the end; 
                and
                    (E) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting 
                the following:
            ``(7) Research, development, and implementation for 
        a water quality improvement program, including 
        restoration of hydrology and tidal flows and 
        remediation of hot spots and other sources of 
        contaminants that degrade existing or planned sites.'';
            (3) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``non-Federal sponsor'' and 
                inserting ``non-Federal interest''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the last sentence 
                the following: ``The non-Federal interest may 
                also provide in-kind services not to exceed the 
                non-Federal share of the total project cost.'';
            (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection 
        (e);
            (5) by inserting after subsection (c) the 
        following:
    ``(d) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a 
project to be carried out under the program developed under 
subsection (a) the cost of design work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.''; and
            (6) in subsection (e) (as redesignated by paragraph 
        (4) of this subsection) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000''.

SEC. 5106. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    (a) Development of Program.--Section 404(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``processes'' and inserting ``and 
        related environmental processes'';
            (2) by inserting after ``Atlantic Coast'' the 
        following: ``(and associated back bays)'';
            (3) by inserting after ``actions'' the following: 
        ``, environmental restoration or conservation measures 
        for coastal and back bays,''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following: ``The plan 
        for collecting data and monitoring information included 
        in such annual report shall be coordinated with and 
        agreed to by appropriate agencies of the State of New 
        York.''.
    (b) Annual Reports.--Section 404(b) of such Act is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Initial Plan.--Not later than 12 
        months after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
        the'' and inserting ``Annual Reports.--The'';
            (2) by striking ``initial plan for data collection 
        and monitoring'' and inserting ``annual report of data 
        collection and monitoring activities''; and
            (3) by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 404(c) of 
such Act (113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking ``and an 
additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter'' 
and inserting ``$2,500,000 for fiscal years 2000 through 2004, 
and $7,500,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 
2004,''.
    (d) Tsunami Warning System.--Section 404 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Tsunami Warning System.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $800,000 for the Secretary to carry out a project 
for a tsunami warning system, Atlantic Coast of New York.''.

SEC. 5107. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639), the Secretary shall 
give priority to work in College Point, New York City, New 
York.

SEC. 5108. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 221 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for ecosystem 
restoration, Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York, 
the cost of design and construction work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.

SEC. 5109. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary may participate with the State of New York, 
New York City, and the Hudson River Park Trust in carrying out 
activities to restore critical marine habitat, improve safety, 
and protect and rehabilitate critical infrastructure with 
respect to the Hudson River. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5110. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK.

    As part of the operation and maintenance of the Mount 
Morris Dam, New York, the Secretary may make improvements to 
the access road for the dam to provide safe access to a Federal 
visitor's center.

SEC. 5111. NORTH HEMPSTEAD AND GLEN COVE NORTH SHORE WATERSHED 
                    RESTORATION, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and 
recreation components of the North Hempstead and Glen Cove 
North Shore watershed restoration, New York.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5112. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and 
recreation components of the Port of Rochester waterfront 
revitalization project, Rochester, New York.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5113. NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
establish a program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in the State of North Carolina.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for environmental infrastructure and resource 
protection and development projects in North Carolina, 
including projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
        treatment, and related facilities;
            (3) drinking water infrastructure including 
        treatment and related facilities;
            (4) environmental restoration;
            (5) stormwater infrastructure; and
            (6) surface water resource protection and 
        development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities development plan or 
                resource protection plan, including appropriate 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project, in an amount not to exceed 6 percent 
                of the total construction costs of the project, 
                the cost of design work carried out by the non-
                Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land).
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $13,000,000.

SEC. 5114. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by inserting ``water 
and'' before ``wastewater''.

SEC. 5115. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the 
calculations necessary to negotiate and execute a revised, 
permanent contract for water supply storage at John H. Kerr Dam 
and Reservoir, North Carolina, among the Secretary and the Kerr 
Lake Regional Water System and the city of Henderson, North 
Carolina.

SEC. 5116. CINCINNATI, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake the ecosystem 
restoration and recreation components of the Central Riverfront 
Park Master Plan, dated December 1999, at a total cost of 
$30,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 5117. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
definitions apply:
            (1) Ohio river basin.--The term ``Ohio River 
        Basin'' means the Ohio River, its backwaters, its side 
        channels, and all tributaries (including their 
        watersheds) that drain into the Ohio River and 
        encompassing areas of any of the States of Indiana, 
        Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Illinois, 
        New York, and Virginia.
            (2) Compact.--The term ``Compact'' means the Ohio 
        River Watershed Sanitation Commission flood and 
        pollution control compact between the States of 
        Indiana, West Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, 
        New York, Illinois, and Virginia, to which consent was 
        given by Congress pursuant to the Act of July 11, 1940 
        (54 Stat. 752) and that was chartered in 1948.
    (b) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide planning, 
design, and construction assistance to the Compact for the 
improvement of the quality of the environment in and along the 
Ohio River Basin.
    (c) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this 
section, the Secretary shall give priority to reducing or 
eliminating the presence of organic pollutants in the Ohio 
River Basin through the renovation and technological 
improvement of the organic detection system monitoring stations 
along the Ohio River in the States of Indiana, Ohio, West 
Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 5118. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The costs of operation and maintenance 
activities for the Toussaint River Federal navigation project, 
Carroll Township, Ohio, that are carried out in accordance with 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) 
and relate directly to the presence of unexploded ordnance, 
shall be carried out at Federal expense.
    (b) Calculation of Total Costs.--The Secretary shall not 
consider the additional costs of dredging due to the presence 
of unexploded ordnance when calculating the costs of the 
project referred to in subsection (a) for the purposes of 
section 107(b) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 577(b)).

SEC. 5119. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance for the development of updates of the Oklahoma 
comprehensive water plan.
    (b) Technical Assistance.--Technical assistance provided 
under subsection (a) may include--
            (1) acquisition of hydrologic data, groundwater 
        characterization, database development, and data 
        distribution;
            (2) expansion of surface water and groundwater 
        monitoring networks;
            (3) assessment of existing water resources, surface 
        water storage, and groundwater storage potential;
            (4) numerical analysis and modeling necessary to 
        provide an integrated understanding of water resources 
        and water management options;
            (5) participation in State planning forums and 
        planning groups;
            (6) coordination of Federal water management 
        planning efforts; and
            (7) technical review of data, models, planning 
        scenarios, and water plans developed by the State.
    (c) Allocation.--The Secretary shall allocate, subject to 
the availability of appropriations, $6,500,000 to provide 
technical assistance and for the development of updates of the 
Oklahoma comprehensive water plan.
    (d) Cost Sharing Requirement.--The non-Federal share of the 
total cost of any activity carried out under this section--
            (1) shall be 25 percent; and
            (2) may be in the form of cash or any in-kind 
        services that the Secretary determines would contribute 
        substantially toward the conduct and completion of the 
        activity assisted.

SEC. 5120. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.

    The Secretary may treat all work carried out for emergency 
corrective actions to repair the embankment dam at the Fern 
Ridge Lake project, Oregon, as a dam safety project. The cost 
of work carried out may be recovered in accordance with section 
1203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
467n; 100 Stat. 4263).

SEC. 5121. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(66) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, 
                in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
        subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
        this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
        paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5122. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' 
and inserting ``$2,000,000''.

SEC. 5123. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is amended by striking 
``Dams'' and inserting ``Dams No. 1-5''.

SEC. 5124. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall use existing water quality data to 
model the effects of the Francis E. Walter Dam, at different 
water levels, to determine its impact on water and related 
resources in and along the Lehigh River in Lehigh County, 
Pennsylvania. There is authorized to be appropriated $500,000 
to carry out this section.

SEC. 5125. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``and Monroe'' 
and inserting ``Northumberland, Union, Snyder, Luzerne, and 
Monroe''.

SEC. 5126. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--Section 567(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3787; 114 
Stat. 2662) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 
        inserting ``and carry out'' after ``develop''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``$10,000,000.'' 
        and inserting ``$20,000,000, of which the Secretary may 
        utilize not more than $5,000,000 to design and 
        construct feasible pilot projects during the 
        development of the strategy to demonstrate alternative 
        approaches for the strategy. The total cost for any 
        single pilot project may not exceed $500,000. The 
        Secretary shall evaluate the results of the pilot 
        projects and consider the results in the development of 
        the strategy.''.
    (b) Partnership Agreements.--Section 567(c) of such Act 
(114 Stat. 2662) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading by striking 
        ``Cooperation'' and inserting ``Partnership''; and
            (2) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``and carrying out'' after 
                ``developing''; and
                    (B) by striking ``cooperation'' and 
                inserting ``cost-sharing and partnership''.
    (c) Implementation of Strategy.--Section 567(d) of such Act 
(114 Stat. 2663) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary'';
            (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) (as so 
        designated)--
                    (A) by striking ``implement'' and inserting 
                ``carry out''; and
                    (B) by striking ``implementing'' and 
                inserting ``carrying out'';
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Priority project.--In carrying out projects 
        to implement the strategy, the Secretary shall give 
        priority to the project for ecosystem restoration, 
        Cooperstown, New York, described in the Upper 
        Susquehanna River Basin--Cooperstown Area Ecosystem 
        Restoration Feasibility Study, dated December 2004, 
        prepared by the Corps of Engineers and the New York 
        State department of environmental conservation.''; and
            (4) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
        paragraph (1) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this 
        subsection) with paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph 
        (3) of this subsection).
    (d) Credit.--Section 567 of such Act (110 Stat. 3787; 114 
Stat. 2662) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of a project under this section--
            ``(1) in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of 
        design and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project; and
            ``(2) the cost of in-kind services and materials 
        provided for the project by the non-Federal 
        interest.''.

SEC. 5127. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the non-
Federal interest concerning flood protection and environmental 
restoration for Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and, 
if the Secretary determines that the report meets the 
evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and 
that the project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the 
project at a total cost of $150,000,000.

SEC. 5128. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838) is 
amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting 
``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 5129. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
                    TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, SOUTH 
                    DAKOTA.

    (a) Disbursement Provisions of State of South Dakota and 
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.--Section 
602(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 386) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (i) by inserting ``and the 
                Secretary of the Treasury'' after 
                ``Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting 
                the following:
                            ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause 
                        (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                        shall make available to the State of 
                        South Dakota funds from the State of 
                        South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife 
                        Habitat Restoration Trust Fund 
                        established under section 603 to be 
                        used to carry out the plan for 
                        terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration submitted by the State of 
                        South Dakota after the State certifies 
                        to the Secretary of the Treasury that 
                        the funds to be disbursed will be used 
                        in accordance with section 603(d)(3) 
                        and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
                        capitalized.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking clause (ii) and 
        inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause 
                        (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                        shall make available to the Cheyenne 
                        River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
                        Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne 
                        River Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife 
                        Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and the 
                        Lower Brule Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife 
                        Habitat Restoration Trust Fund, 
                        respectively, established under section 
                        604, to be used to carry out the plans 
                        for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration submitted by the Cheyenne 
                        River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
                        Sioux Tribe, respectively, to after the 
                        respective tribe certifies to the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury that the 
                        funds to be disbursed will be used in 
                        accordance with section 604(d)(3) and 
                        only after the Trust Fund is fully 
                        capitalized.''.
    (b) Investment Provisions of the State of South Dakota 
Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund.--Section 603 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 388; 114 
Stat. 2664) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any 
        other provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall invest the amounts deposited under subsection (b) 
        and the interest earned on those amounts only in 
        interest-bearing obligations of the United States 
        issued directly to the Fund.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the 
                Treasury shall invest the amounts in the Fund 
                in accordance with the requirements of this 
                paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                            ``(i) Principal account.--The 
                        amounts deposited in the Fund under 
                        subsection (b) shall be credited to an 
                        account within the Fund (referred to in 
                        this paragraph as the `principal 
                        account') and invested as provided in 
                        subparagraph (C).
                            ``(ii) Interest account.--The 
                        interest earned from investing amounts 
                        in the principal account of the Fund 
                        shall be transferred to a separate 
                        account within the Fund (referred to in 
                        this paragraph as the `interest 
                        account') and invested as provided in 
                        subparagraph (D).
                            ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest 
                        earned from investing amounts in the 
                        interest account of the Fund shall be 
                        credited to the interest account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                            ``(i) Initial investment.--Each 
                        amount deposited in the principal 
                        account of the Fund shall be invested 
                        initially in eligible obligations 
                        having the shortest maturity then 
                        available until the date on which the 
                        amount is divided into 3 substantially 
                        equal portions and those portions are 
                        invested in eligible obligations that 
                        are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued 
                        publicly issued Treasury obligations 
                        having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
                        maturity, and a 10-year maturity, 
                        respectively.
                            ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As 
                        each 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year 
                        eligible obligation matures, the 
                        principal of the maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall also be invested 
                        initially in the shortest-maturity 
                        eligible obligation then available 
                        until the principal is reinvested 
                        substantially equally in the eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except 
                        for transferability) to the next-issued 
                        publicly issued Treasury obligations 
                        having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year 
                        maturities.
                            ``(iii) Discontinuance of issuance 
                        of obligations.--If the Department of 
                        the Treasury discontinues issuing to 
                        the public obligations having 2-year, 
                        5-year, or 10-year maturities, the 
                        principal of any maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall be reinvested 
                        substantially equally in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except 
                        for transferability) to the next-issued 
                        publicly issued Treasury obligations of 
                        the maturities longer than 1 year then 
                        available.
                    ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                            ``(i) Before full capitalization.--
                        Until the date on which the Fund is 
                        fully capitalized, amounts in the 
                        interest account of the Fund shall be 
                        invested in eligible obligations that 
                        are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to publicly issued 
                        Treasury obligations that have 
                        maturities that coincide, to the 
                        maximum extent practicable, with the 
                        date on which the Fund is expected to 
                        be fully capitalized.
                            ``(ii) After full capitalization.--
                        On and after the date on which the Fund 
                        is fully capitalized, amounts in the 
                        interest account of the Fund shall be 
                        invested and reinvested in eligible 
                        obligations having the shortest 
                        maturity then available until the 
                        amounts are withdrawn and transferred 
                        to fund the activities authorized under 
                        subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be 
                paid for eligible obligations purchased as 
                investments of the principal account shall not 
                exceed the par value of the obligations so that 
                the amount of the principal account shall be 
                preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible 
                obligations having the same maturity and 
                purchase price, the obligation to be purchased 
                shall be the obligation having the highest 
                yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible 
                obligations purchased shall generally be held 
                to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not 
        less frequently than once each calendar year, the 
        Secretary of the Treasury shall review with the State 
        of South Dakota the results of the investment 
        activities and financial status of the Fund during the 
        preceding 12-month period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the 
                State of South Dakota (referred to in this 
                subsection as the `State') in carrying out the 
                plan of the State for terrestrial wildlife 
                habitat restoration under section 602(a) shall 
                be audited as part of the annual audit that the 
                State is required to prepare under the Office 
                of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a 
                successor circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An 
                auditor that conducts an audit under 
                subparagraph (A) shall--
                            ``(i) determine whether funds 
                        received by the State under this 
                        section during the period covered by 
                        the audit were used to carry out the 
                        plan of the State in accordance with 
                        this section; and
                            ``(ii) include the determination 
                        under clause (i) in the written 
                        findings of the audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the 
                Treasury determines that meeting the 
                requirements under paragraph (2) with respect 
                to the investment of a Fund is not practicable, 
                or would result in adverse consequences for the 
                Fund, the Secretary shall modify the 
                requirements, as the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a 
                requirement under subparagraph (A), the 
                Secretary of the Treasury shall consult with 
                the State regarding the proposed 
                modification.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ``of the 
        Treasury'' after ``Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Fund and auditing the uses of 
amounts withdrawn from the Fund--
            ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 
        2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each 
        subsequent fiscal year.''.
    (c) Investment Provisions for Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Trust Funds.--Section 604 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389; 114 
Stat. 2665) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any 
        other provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall invest the amounts deposited under subsection (b) 
        and the interest earned on those amounts only in 
        interest-bearing obligations of the United States 
        issued directly to the Funds.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the 
                Treasury shall invest the amounts in each of 
                the Funds in accordance with the requirements 
                of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                            ``(i) Principal account.--The 
                        amounts deposited in each Fund under 
                        subsection (b) shall be credited to an 
                        account within the Fund (referred to in 
                        this paragraph as the `principal 
                        account') and invested as provided in 
                        subparagraph (C).
                            ``(ii) Interest account.--The 
                        interest earned from investing amounts 
                        in the principal account of each Fund 
                        shall be transferred to a separate 
                        account within the Fund (referred to in 
                        this paragraph as the `interest 
                        account') and invested as provided in 
                        subparagraph (D).
                            ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest 
                        earned from investing amounts in the 
                        interest account of each Fund shall be 
                        credited to the interest account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                            ``(i) Initial investment.--Each 
                        amount deposited in the principal 
                        account of each Fund shall be invested 
                        initially in eligible obligations 
                        having the shortest maturity then 
                        available until the date on which the 
                        amount is divided into 3 substantially 
                        equal portions and those portions are 
                        invested in eligible obligations that 
                        are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued 
                        publicly issued Treasury obligations 
                        having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
                        maturity, and a 10-year maturity, 
                        respectively.
                            ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As 
                        each 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year 
                        eligible obligation matures, the 
                        principal of the maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall also be invested 
                        initially in the shortest-maturity 
                        eligible obligation then available 
                        until the principal is reinvested 
                        substantially equally in the eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except 
                        for transferability) to the next-issued 
                        publicly issued Treasury obligations 
                        having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year 
                        maturities.
                            ``(iii) Discontinuation of issuance 
                        of obligations.--If the Department of 
                        the Treasury discontinues issuing to 
                        the public obligations having 2-year, 
                        5-year, or 10-year maturities, the 
                        principal of any maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall be reinvested 
                        substantially equally in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except 
                        for transferability) to the next-issued 
                        publicly issued Treasury obligations of 
                        the maturities longer than 1 year then 
                        available.
                    ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                            ``(i) Before full capitalization.--
                        Until the date on which each Fund is 
                        fully capitalized, amounts in the 
                        interest account of the Fund shall be 
                        invested in eligible obligations that 
                        are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to publicly issued 
                        Treasury obligations that have 
                        maturities that coincide, to the 
                        maximum extent practicable, with the 
                        date on which the Fund is expected to 
                        be fully capitalized.
                            ``(ii) After full capitalization.--
                        On and after the date on which each 
                        Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in 
                        the interest account of the Fund shall 
                        be invested and reinvested in eligible 
                        obligations having the shortest 
                        maturity then available until the 
                        amounts are withdrawn and transferred 
                        to fund the activities authorized under 
                        subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be 
                paid for eligible obligations purchased as 
                investments of the principal account shall not 
                exceed the par value of the obligations so that 
                the amount of the principal account shall be 
                preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible 
                obligations having the same maturity and 
                purchase price, the obligation to be purchased 
                shall be the obligation having the highest 
                yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible 
                obligations purchased shall generally be held 
                to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not 
        less frequently than once each calendar year, the 
        Secretary of the Treasury shall review with the 
        Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux 
        Tribe (referred to in this subsection as the `Tribes') 
        the results of the investment activities and financial 
        status of the Funds during the preceding 12-month 
        period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the 
                Tribes in carrying out the plans of the Tribes 
                for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
                under section 602(a) shall be audited as part 
                of the annual audit that the Tribes are 
                required to prepare under the Office of 
                Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a 
                successor circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An 
                auditor that conducts an audit under 
                subparagraph (A) shall--
                            ``(i) determine whether funds 
                        received by the Tribes under this 
                        section during the period covered by 
                        the audit were used to carry out the 
                        plan of the appropriate Tribe in 
                        accordance with this section; and
                            ``(ii) include the determination 
                        under clause (i) in the written 
                        findings of the audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the 
                Treasury determines that meeting the 
                requirements under paragraph (2) with respect 
                to the investment of a Fund is not practicable, 
                or would result in adverse consequences for the 
                Fund, the Secretary shall modify the 
                requirements, as the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a 
                requirement under subparagraph (A), the 
                Secretary of the Treasury shall consult with 
                the Tribes regarding the proposed 
                modification.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Funds and auditing the uses of 
amounts withdrawn from the Funds--
            ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 
        2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each 
        subsequent fiscal year.''.

SEC. 5130. EAST TENNESSEE.

    (a) East Tennessee Defined.--In this section, the term 
``East Tennessee'' means the counties of Blount, Knox, Loudon, 
McMinn, Monroe, and Sevier, Tennessee.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in East Tennessee.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in East Tennessee, 
including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
facilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of a project that is the subject of an 
                agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal 
                share of the project cost.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project cost (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5131. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall--
            (1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing 
        Agricultural Spur Levee, Tennessee, to determine the 
        extent of levee modifications that would be required to 
        make the levee and associated drainage structures 
        consistent with Federal standards;
            (2) design and construct such modifications; and
            (3) after completion of such modifications, 
        incorporate the levee into the project for flood 
        control, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized 
        by the Act entitled ``An Act for the control of floods 
        on the Mississippi River and its tributaries, and for 
        other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534-
        539).

SEC. 5132. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct a trail 
system at the J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee, 
authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers 
and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and adjacent public 
property, including design and construction of support 
facilities. In carrying out such improvements, the Secretary is 
authorized to use funds made available by the State of 
Tennessee from any Federal or State source, or both.

SEC. 5133. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, recreation, navigation, and flood damage 
reduction components of the Nashville Riverfront Concept Plan, 
dated February 2007.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in 
the vicinity of Nashville, Tennessee, including the Nashville 
Parks and Recreation Department, the city of Nashville, and 
Davidson County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5134. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

    The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee 
and Mississippi, authorized by section 401 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124) and modified 
by section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2611), is modified to authorize the Secretary--
            (1) to reconstruct, at Federal expense, the weir 
        originally constructed in the vicinity of the mouth of 
        Nonconnah Creek; and
            (2) to make repairs and maintain the weir in the 
        future so that the weir functions properly.

SEC. 5135. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP.

    (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance 
of the project for navigation, Tennessee River, Tennessee, 
Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, authorized by the first 
section of the River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 
927), the Secretary may enter into a partnership with a 
nonprofit entity to remove debris from the Tennessee River in 
the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, by providing a vessel to 
such entity, at Federal expense, for such debris removal 
purposes.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.

SEC. 5136. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall design and construct the project for 
flood damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in the Town 
Creek, Lenoir City, Loudon County, Tennessee, feasibility 
report of the Nashville district engineer, dated November 2000, 
under the authority of section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwithstanding section 1 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a; 49 Stat. 1570). 
The non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 
subject to section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).

SEC. 5137. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, AND 
                    MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary may participate with non-Federal and 
nonprofit entities to address issues concerning managing 
groundwater as a sustainable resource through the Upper 
Mississippi Embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi, 
and to coordinate the protection of groundwater supply and 
groundwater quality of the Embayment with local surface water 
protection programs. There is authorized to be appropriated 
$5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5138. TEXAS.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
establish a program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in the State of Texas.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of planning, design, and 
construction assistance for water-related environmental 
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects 
in Texas, including projects for water supply, storage, 
treatment, and related facilities, water quality protection, 
wastewater treatment, and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection, and 
development, as identified by the Texas Water Development 
Board.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--Before providing assistance 
under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        the project under this section--
                    (A) shall be 75 percent; and
                    (B) may be provided in the form of grants 
                or reimbursements of project costs.
            (2) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share may be 
        provided in the form of materials and in-kind services, 
        including planning, design, construction, and 
        management services, as the Secretary determines to be 
        compatible with, and necessary for, the project.
            (3) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, 
        in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
        of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of design 
        work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement 
        for the project.
            (4) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
        way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
        land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
        the non-Federal share of project costs.
            (5) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
        share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
        constructed with assistance provided under this section 
        shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5139. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation 
with appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall 
develop, as expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan 
for development of new technologies and innovative approaches 
for restoring, preserving, and protecting the Bosque River 
watershed within Bosque, Hamilton, McLennan, and Erath 
Counties, Texas. The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Secretary of Agriculture, may carry out activities identified 
in the comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable 
alternatives for stabilization and enhancement of land and 
water resources in the basin.
    (b) Services of Nonprofit Institutions and Other 
Entities.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may 
utilize, through contracts or other means, the services of 
nonprofit institutions and such other entities as the Secretary 
considers appropriate.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (2) Development of comprehensive plan.--The non-
        Federal share of the cost of development of the plan 
        under subsection (a) shall be 25 percent.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
        share of the cost of operation and maintenance for 
        measures constructed with assistance provided under 
        this section shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 5140. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS.

    (a) Dallas County Region Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``Dallas County region'' means the city of Dallas, and the 
municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, Lancaster, Wilmer, 
Hutchins, Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, Glenn Heights, and Ferris, 
Texas.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in the Dallas County region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
resource protection and development projects in the Dallas 
County region, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
        partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a 
        project entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                cost of a project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of 
                        grants or reimbursements of project 
                        costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall 
                credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost design work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of a project that is the subject of an 
                agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal 
                share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-
                of-way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to be 
carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5141. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Trinity 
River and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the 
Act entitled, ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, 
and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 18), 
is modified to--
            (1) direct the Secretary to review the Balanced 
        Vision Plan for the Trinity River Corridor, Dallas, 
        Texas, dated December 2003 and amended in March 2004, 
        prepared by the non-Federal interest for the project;
            (2) direct the Secretary to review the Interior 
        Levee Drainage Study Phase-I report, Dallas, Texas, 
        dated September 2006, prepared by the non-Federal 
        interest; and
            (3) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        technically sound and environmentally acceptable, 
        authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
        total cost of $459,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $298,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $161,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--
            (1) In-kind contributions.--The Secretary shall 
        credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
        of planning, design, and construction work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project.
            (2) Cash contributions.--The Secretary shall accept 
        funds provided by the non-Federal interest for use in 
        carrying out planning, engineering, and design for the 
        project. The Federal share of such planning, 
        engineering, and design carried out with non-Federal 
        contributions shall be credited against the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project.

SEC. 5142. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    Section 575(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;
            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at the 
        end and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding the following:
            ``(5) the project for flood control, Upper White 
        Oak Bayou, Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4125).''.

SEC. 5143. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
environmental restoration, and recreation, Johnson Creek, 
Arlington, Texas, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat 280), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the report entitled ``Johnson 
Creek: A Vision of Conservation'', dated March 30, 2006, at a 
total cost of $80,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $28,000,000, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project may be provided in cash or in the form 
        of in-kind services or materials.
            (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
    (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the 
project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4184).
    (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 134 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2263) is 
repealed.

SEC. 5144. ONION CREEK, TEXAS.

    (a) Inclusion of Costs and Benefits of Relocation of Flood-
Prone Residences.--In carrying out the study for the project 
for flood damage reduction, recreation, and ecosystem 
restoration, Onion Creek, Texas, the Secretary shall include 
the costs and benefits associated with the relocation of flood-
prone residences in the study area for the project in the 
period beginning 2 years before the date of initiation of the 
study and ending on the date of execution of the partnership 
agreement for construction of the project to the extent the 
Secretary determines such relocations are compatible with the 
project.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
referred to in subsection (a) the cost of relocation of those 
flood-prone residences described in subsection (a) that are 
incurred by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.

SEC. 5145. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate, design, and 
carry out structural modifications at Federal cost to the Union 
Village Dam (Ompompanoosuc River), North Hartland Dam 
(Ottauquechee River), North Springfield Dam (Black River), Ball 
Mountain Dam (West River), and Townshend Dam (West River), 
Vermont, to regulate flow and temperature to mitigate 
downstream impacts on aquatic habitat and fisheries.
    (b) Inclusion.--During the evaluation and design portion of 
the modifications authorized by this section, the Secretary 
shall ensure that a sustainable flow analysis is conducted for 
each dam.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.

SEC. 5146. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

    (a) Dispersal Barrier Project.--The Secretary shall 
determine, at Federal expense, the feasibility of a dispersal 
barrier project at the Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New 
York, to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species.
    (b) Construction, Maintenance, and Operation.--If the 
Secretary determines that the project described in subsection 
(a) is feasible, the Secretary shall construct, maintain, and 
operate a dispersal barrier at the Lake Champlain Canal at 
Federal expense.

SEC. 5147. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park 
Service to restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.

SEC. 5148. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20,000,000 for water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water 
                supply, wastewater infrastructure, and 
                environmental restoration'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, 
                in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
        subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
        this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
        paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5149. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park 
Service to provide technical and project management assistance 
for the James River, Virginia, with a particular emphasis on 
locations along the shoreline adversely impacted by Hurricane 
Isabel.

SEC. 5150. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation 
in Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine if the 
siltation is the result of a Federal navigation project 
(including diverted flows from the Columbia River) and, if the 
Secretary determines that the siltation is the result of a 
Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a 
project to mitigate the siltation as part of maintenance of the 
Federal navigation project.

SEC. 5151. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and construct 
a campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at Hamilton Island 
(also known as ``Strawberry Island'') in Skamania County, 
Washington.

SEC. 5152. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Lower Columbia River levees and bank 
protection works authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 178) is modified with regard to the 
Wahkiakum County diking districts No. 1 and 3, but without 
regard to any cost ceiling authorized before the date of 
enactment of this Act, to direct the Secretary to provide a 
one-time placement of dredged material along portions of the 
Columbia River shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, between 
river miles 38 to 47, and the shoreline of Westport Beach, 
Clatsop County, Oregon, between river miles 43 to 45, to 
protect economic and environmental resources in the area from 
further erosion.
    (b) Coordination and Cost-Sharing Requirements.--The 
Secretary shall carry out subsection (a)--
            (1) in coordination with appropriate resource 
        agencies; and
            (2) at Federal expense.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.

SEC. 5153. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON.

    Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2675) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``may 
        construct'' and inserting ``shall construct''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and ecosystem restoration'' 
        after ``erosion protection'' each place it appears.

SEC. 5154. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    (a) Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia.--Section 
581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 313) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``flood control measures'' and 
        inserting ``structural and nonstructural flood control, 
        streambank protection, stormwater management, and 
        channel clearing and modification measures''; and
            (2) by inserting ``with respect to measures that 
        incorporate levees or floodwalls'' before the 
        semicolon.
    (b) Priority Communities.--Section 581(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
        (5);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
        (6) and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek 
        watershed; and
            ``(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty's Run 
        River basin.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 581(c) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is 
amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$90,000,000''.

SEC. 5155. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 371) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Nicholas,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Gilmer,'';
            (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$10,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$20,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this section, a non-
Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5156. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Corps of Engineers.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 Stat. 320) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Corps of Engineers.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects 
under this section at Federal expense.''.
    (b) Southern West Virginia Defined.--Section 340(f) of such 
Act is amended by inserting ``Nicholas,'' after 
``Greenbrier,''.
    (c) Nonprofit Entities.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is further amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)), for any project carried out under this section, a non-
Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 5157. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                    INTERESTS.

    Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(12) Perris, california.--The project for flood 
        control, Perris, California.
            ``(13) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--
        An element of the project for flood control, 
        Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Illinois.
            ``(14) Larose to golden meadow, louisiana.--The 
        project for flood control, Larose to Golden Meadow, 
        Louisiana.
            ``(15) Buffalo bayou, texas.--A project for flood 
        control, Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an 
        alternative to the project authorized by the first 
        section of the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938 
        (52 Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the Flood 
        Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 1414).
            ``(16) Halls bayou, texas.--A project for flood 
        control, Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative 
        to the project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and 
        tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
        4610).
            ``(17) Menomonee river watershed, wisconsin.--The 
        project for the Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin, 
        including--
                    ``(A) the Underwood Creek diversion 
                facility project (Milwaukee County Grounds); 
                and
                    ``(B) the Greater Milwaukee Rivers 
                watershed project.''.

SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 113 Stat. 1494; 
114 Stat. 2763A-219; 119 Stat. 2255) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(5) by striking ``a project 
        for the elimination or control of combined sewer 
        overflows'' and inserting ``projects for the design, 
        installation, enhancement, or repair of sewer 
        systems'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(1) by striking 
        ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$32,500,000''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking the undesignated paragraph 
                relating to Charleston, South Carolina, and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater 
        collection systems, and stormwater system improvements, 
        Charleston, South Carolina.'';
                    (B) by redesignating the paragraph (71) 
                relating to Placer and El Dorado Counties, 
                California, as paragraph (73);
                    (C) by redesignating the paragraph (72) 
                relating to Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and 
                Nevada Counties, California, as paragraph (74);
                    (D) by striking the paragraph (71) relating 
                to Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure for Indianapolis, 
        Indiana.'';
                    (E) by redesignating the paragraph (73) 
                relating to St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as 
                paragraph (76);
                    (F) by redesignating paragraph (72), 
                relating to Alpine, California, as paragraph 
                (77); and
                    (G) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(78) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, St. Clair County, 
        Alabama.
            ``(79) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
            ``(80) Alameda and contra costa counties, 
        california.--$25,000,000 for recycled water treatment 
        facilities within the East Bay Municipal Utility 
        District service area, Alameda and Contra Costa 
        Counties, California.
            ``(81) Aliso creek, orange county, california.--
        $5,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Aliso 
        Creek, Orange County, California.
            ``(82) Amador county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure, 
        Amador County, California.
            ``(83) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, 
        california.--$33,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Arcadia, Sierra Madre, and Upland, 
        California, including $13,000,000 for stormwater 
        infrastructure for Upland, California.
            ``(84) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, 
        california.--$15,000,000 for water reclamation and 
        distribution infrastructure, Big Bear Area Regional 
        Wastewater Agency, California.
            ``(85) Brawley colonia, imperial county, 
        california.--$1,400,000 for water infrastructure to 
        improve water quality in the Brawley Colonia Water 
        District, Imperial County, California.
            ``(86) Calaveras county, california.--$3,000,000 
        for water supply and wastewater infrastructure 
        improvement projects in Calaveras County, California, 
        including wastewater reclamation, recycling, and 
        conjunctive use projects.
            ``(87) Contra costa water district, california.--
        $23,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure for 
        the Contra Costa Water District, California.
            ``(88) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara 
        areas, california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination 
        project to serve the East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa 
        Clara areas, California.
            ``(89) East palo alto, california.--$4,000,000 for 
        a new pump station and stormwater management and 
        drainage system, East Palo Alto, California.
            ``(90) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 
        for wastewater infrastructure, including a wastewater 
        disinfection facility and polishing system, to improve 
        water quality in the vicinity of Calexico, California, 
        on the southern New River, Imperial County, California.
            ``(91) La habra, california.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, city of La 
        Habra, California.
            ``(92) La mirada, california.--$4,000,000 for the 
        planning, design, and construction of a stormwater 
        program in La Mirada, California.
            ``(93) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 
        for wastewater and water related infrastructure, 
        Diamond Bar, La Habra Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los 
        Angeles County, California.
            ``(94) Los angeles county, california.--$20,000,000 
        for the planning, design, and construction of water 
        related infrastructure for Santa Monica Bay and the 
        coastal zone of Los Angeles County, California.
            ``(95) Malibu, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        municipal wastewater and recycled water infrastructure, 
        Malibu Creek Watershed Protection Project, Malibu, 
        California.
            ``(96) Montebello, california.--$4,000,000 for 
        water infrastructure improvements in south Montebello, 
        California.
            ``(97) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure to improve water quality in 
        the New River, California.
            ``(98) Orange county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, 
        Brea, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba 
        Linda, Orange County, California.
            ``(99) Port of stockton, stockton, california.--
        $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure 
        projects for Rough and Ready Island and vicinity, 
        Stockton, California.
            ``(100) Perris, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        recycled water transmission infrastructure, Eastern 
        Municipal Water District, Perris, California.
            ``(101) San bernardino county, california.--
        $9,000,000 for wastewater and water related 
        infrastructure, Chino and Chino Hills, San Bernardino 
        County, California.
            ``(102) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 
        for an advanced recycling water treatment plant in 
        Santa Clara County, California.
            ``(103) Santa monica, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        improving water system reliability, Santa Monica, 
        California.
            ``(104) Southern los angeles county, california.--
        $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the 
        groundwater basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los 
        Angeles County, California.
            ``(105) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for 
        water treatment and distribution infrastructure, 
        Stockton, California.
            ``(106) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
        california.--$375,000 to improve water quality and 
        remove nonnative aquatic nuisance species from the 
        Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
            ``(107) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for 
        water, wastewater, and water related infrastructure, 
        Whittier, California.
            ``(108) Arkansas valley conduit, colorado.--
        $10,000,000 for the Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado.
            ``(109) Boulder county, colorado.--$10,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Boulder County, Colorado.
            ``(110) Montezuma and la plata counties, 
        colorado.--$1,000,000 for water and wastewater related 
        infrastructure for the Ute Mountain project, Montezuma 
        and La Plata Counties, Colorado.
            ``(111) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers 
        counties, colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission 
        infrastructure, Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and 
        Prowers Counties, Colorado.
            ``(112) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--
        $34,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
        Pueblo and Otero Counties, Colorado.
            ``(113) Enfield, connecticut.--$1,000,000 for 
        infiltration and inflow correction, Enfield, 
        Connecticut.
            ``(114) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--
        $7,113,000 for water infrastructure, Ledyard and 
        Montville, Connecticut.
            ``(115) New haven, connecticut.--$300,000 for 
        stormwater system improvements, New Haven, Connecticut.
            ``(116) Norwalk, connecticut.--$3,000,000 for the 
        Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvement Project, Norwalk, 
        Connecticut.
            ``(117) Plainville, connecticut.--$6,280,000 for 
        wastewater treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
            ``(118) Southington, connecticut.--$9,420,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Southington, Connecticut.
            ``(119) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
        maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure 
        and resource protection and development to enhance 
        water quality and living resources in the Anacostia 
        River watershed, District of Columbia and Maryland.
            ``(120) District of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
        implementation of a combined sewer overflow long-term 
        control plan in the District of Columbia.
            ``(121) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
            ``(122) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, 
        florida.--$20,000,000 for water supply 
        interconnectivity infrastructure, Charlotte, Lee, and 
        Collier Counties, Florida.
            ``(123) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for 
        water infrastructure to improve water quality in the 
        vicinity of the Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
            ``(124) Hillsborough county, florida.--$6,250,000 
        for water infrastructure and supply enhancement, 
        Hillsborough County, Florida.
            ``(125) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure, including septic 
        tank replacements, Jacksonville, Florida.
            ``(126) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, 
        Florida.
            ``(127) South seminole and north orange county, 
        florida.--$30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for 
        the South Seminole and North Orange Wastewater 
        Transmission Authority, Florida.
            ``(128) Miami-dade county, florida.--$6,250,000 for 
        water reuse supply and a water transmission pipeline, 
        Miami-Dade County, Florida.
            ``(129) Palm beach county, florida.--$7,500,000 for 
        water infrastructure, Palm Beach County, Florida.
            ``(130) Albany, georgia.--$4,000,000 for a storm 
        drainage system, Albany, Georgia.
            ``(131) Banks county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for 
        water infrastructure improvements, Banks County, 
        Georgia.
            ``(132) Berrien county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for 
        water infrastructure improvements, Berrien County, 
        Georgia.
            ``(133) Chattooga county, georgia.--$8,000,000 for 
        wastewater and drinking water infrastructure 
        improvement, Chattooga County, Georgia.
            ``(134) Chattooga, floyd, gordon, walker, and 
        whitfield counties, georgia.--$10,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Armuchee Valley, 
        Chattooga, Floyd, Gordon, Walker, and Whitfield 
        Counties, Georgia.
            ``(135) Dahlonega, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Dahlonega, Georgia.
            ``(136) East point, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, city of East Point, 
        Georgia.
            ``(137) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine 
        mountain (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, 
        georgia.--$24,500,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, 
        Pine Mountain (Harris County), Douglasville, and 
        Carrollton, Georgia.
            ``(138) Meriwether and spalding counties, 
        georgia.--$7,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Meriwether and Spalding Counties, 
        Georgia.
            ``(139) Moultrie, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Moultrie, Georgia.
            ``(140) Stephens county/city of toccoa, georgia.--
        $8,000,000 water infrastructure improvements, Stephens 
        County/city of Toccoa, Georgia.
            ``(141) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--
        $1,700,000 for wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon 
        and Butlerville, Indiana.
            ``(142) Salem, washington county, indiana.--
        $3,200,000 for water supply infrastructure, Salem, 
        Washington County, Indiana.
            ``(143) Atchison, kansas.--$20,000,000 to address 
        combined sewer overflows, Atchison, Kansas.
            ``(144) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure and resource protection and 
        development, Scott, Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, 
        Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, Boyle, Lincoln, Garrard, 
        Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, Montgomery, and Bourbon 
        Counties, Kentucky.
            ``(145) Lafayette, louisiana.--$1,200,000 for water 
        and wastewater improvements, Lafayette, Louisiana.
            ``(146) Lafourche parish, louisiana.--$2,300,000 
        for measures to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into 
        the freshwater system, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana.
            ``(147) Lake charles, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater improvements, Lake Charles, 
        Louisiana.
            ``(148) Northwest louisiana council of governments, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        improvements, Northwest Louisiana Council of 
        Governments, Louisiana.
            ``(149) Ouachita parish, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater improvements, Ouachita Parish, 
        Louisiana.
            ``(150) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for 
        sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Plaquemine, Louisiana.
            ``(151) Rapides area planning commission, 
        louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        improvements, Rapides, Louisiana.
            ``(152) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
            ``(153) South central planning and development 
        commission, louisiana.--$2,500,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, South Central Planning and 
        Development Commission, Louisiana.
            ``(154) Union-lincoln regional water supply 
        project, louisiana.--$2,000,000 for the Union-Lincoln 
        Regional Water Supply project, Louisiana.
            ``(155) Chesapeake bay improvements, maryland, 
        virginia, and district of columbia.--$30,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure projects to benefit the 
        Chesapeake Bay, including the nutrient removal project 
        at the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment facility in the 
        District of Columbia.
            ``(156) Chesapeake bay region, maryland and 
        virginia.--$40,000,000 for water pollution control, 
        Chesapeake Bay Region, Maryland and Virginia.
            ``(157) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--
        $35,000,000 for correction of combined sewer overflows, 
        Michigan.
            ``(158) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
        minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure 
        for the Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to 
        serve the cities of Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and 
        Kinney, and Balkan and Great Scott Townships, 
        Minnesota.
            ``(159) Central lake region sanitary district, 
        minnesota.--$2,000,000 for sanitary sewer and 
        wastewater infrastructure for the Central Lake Region 
        Sanitary District, Minnesota, to serve Le Grande and 
        Moe Townships, Minnesota.
            ``(160) Goodview, minnesota.--$3,000,000 for water 
        quality infrastructure, Goodview, Minnesota.
            ``(161) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
            ``(162) Willmar, minnesota.--$15,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Willmar, Minnesota.
            ``(163) Biloxi, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, 
        Mississippi.
            ``(164) Corinth, mississippi.--$7,500,000 for a 
        surface water program, city of Corinth, Mississippi.
            ``(165) Gulfport, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater related infrastructure, city of 
        Gulfport, Mississippi.
            ``(166) Harrison county, mississippi.--$5,000,000 
        for water and wastewater related infrastructure, 
        Harrison County, Mississippi.
            ``(167) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, 
        Mississippi.
            ``(168) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
            ``(169) Clean water coalition, nevada.--$50,000,000 
        for the Systems Conveyance and Operations Program, 
        Clark County, Henderson, Las Vegas, and North Las 
        Vegas, Nevada.
            ``(170) Glendale dam diversion structure, nevada.--
        $10,000,000 for water system improvements to the 
        Glendale Dam Diversion Structure for the Truckee 
        Meadows Water Authority, Nevada.
            ``(171) Henderson, nevada.--$13,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
            ``(172) Indian springs, nevada.--$12,000,000 for 
        construction of wastewater system improvements for the 
        Indian Springs community, Nevada.
            ``(173) Reno, nevada.--$13,000,000 for construction 
        of a water conservation project for the Highland Canal, 
        Mogul Bypass in Reno, Nevada.
            ``(174) Washoe county, nevada.--$14,000,000 for 
        construction of water infrastructure improvements to 
        the Huffaker Hills Reservoir Conservation Project, 
        Washoe County, Nevada.
            ``(175) Cranford township, new jersey.--$6,000,000 
        for storm sewer improvements, Cranford Township, New 
        Jersey.
            ``(176) Middletown township, new jersey.--
        $1,100,000 for storm sewer improvements, Middletown 
        Township, New Jersey.
            ``(177) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
            ``(178) Rahway valley, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for 
        sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements in the 
        service area of the Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, 
        New Jersey.
            ``(179) Babylon, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Town of Babylon, New York.
            ``(180) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for 
        water supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Ellicottville, New York.
            ``(181) Elmira, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
            ``(182) Essex hamlet, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New York.
            ``(183) Fleming, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
        water infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
            ``(184) Kiryas joel, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        drinking water infrastructure, village of Kiryas Joel, 
        New York.
            ``(185) Niagara falls, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Niagara Falls Water Board, 
        New York.
            ``(186) Patchogue, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, village of Patchogue, New 
        York.
            ``(187) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, town of Sennett, New York.
            ``(188) Springport and fleming, new york.--
        $10,000,000 for water related infrastructure, including 
        water mains, pump stations, and water storage tanks, 
        Springport and Fleming, New York.
            ``(189) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Wellsville, New York.
            ``(190) Yates county, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        drinking water infrastructure, Yates County, New York.
            ``(191) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--
        $4,500,000 for water related infrastructure, Cabarrus 
        County, North Carolina.
            ``(192) Cary, wake county, north carolina.--
        $4,000,000 for a water reclamation facility, Cary, Wake 
        County, North Carolina.
            ``(193) Charlotte, north carolina.--$14,000,000 for 
        the Briar Creek Relief Sewer project, city of 
        Charlotte, North Carolina.
            ``(194) Fayetteville, cumberland county, north 
        carolina.--$6,000,000 for water and sewer upgrades, 
        city of Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(195) Mooresville, north carolina.--$4,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure improvements, 
        town of Mooresville, North Carolina.
            ``(196) Neuse regional water and sewer authority, 
        north carolina.--$4,000,000 for the Neuse regional 
        drinking water facility, Kinston, North Carolina.
            ``(197) Richmond county, north carolina.--
        $13,500,000 for water related infrastructure, Richmond 
        County, North Carolina.
            ``(198) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 
        for water related infrastructure, Union County, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(199) Washington county, north carolina.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Washington County, North Carolina.
            ``(200) Winston-salem, north carolina.--$3,000,000 
        for stormwater upgrades, city of Winston-Salem, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(201) North dakota.--$15,000,000 for water-
        related infrastructure, North Dakota.
            ``(202) Devils lake, north dakota.--$15,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Devils Lake, North Dakota.
            ``(203) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--
        $20,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Saipan, 
        Northern Mariana Islands.
            ``(204) Akron, ohio.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Akron, Ohio
            ``(205) Burr oak regional water district, ohio.--
        $4,000,000 for construction of a water line to extend 
        from a well field near Chauncey, Ohio, to a water 
        treatment plant near Millfield, Ohio.
            ``(206) Cincinnati, ohio.--$1,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Cincinnati, Ohio.
            ``(207) Cleveland, ohio.--$2,500,000 for Flats East 
        Bank water and wastewater infrastructure, city of 
        Cleveland, Ohio.
            ``(208) Columbus, ohio.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Columbus, Ohio.
            ``(209) Dayton, ohio.--$1,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(210) Defiance county, ohio.--$1,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Defiance County, Ohio.
            ``(211) Fostoria, ohio.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Fostoria, Ohio.
            ``(212) Fremont, ohio.--$2,000,000 for construction 
        of off-stream water supply reservoir, Fremont, Ohio.
            ``(213) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
            ``(214) Lawrence county, ohio.--$5,000,000 for 
        Union Rome wastewater infrastructure, Lawrence County, 
        Ohio.
            ``(215) Meigs county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to extend 
        the Tupper Plains Regional Water District water line to 
        Meigs County, Ohio.
            ``(216) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
            ``(217) Vinton county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to 
        construct water lines in Vinton and Brown Townships, 
        Ohio.
            ``(218) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
            ``(219) Ada, oklahoma.--$1,700,000 for sewer 
        improvements and other water infrastructure, city of 
        Ada, Oklahoma.
            ``(220) Alva, oklahoma.--$250,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure improvements, city of Alva, Oklahoma.
            ``(221) Ardmore, oklahoma.--$1,900,000 for water 
        and sewer infrastructure improvements, city of Ardmore, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(222) Bartlesville, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, city of Bartlesville, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(223) Bethany, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Bethany, Oklahoma.
            ``(224) Chickasha, oklahoma.--$650,000 for 
        industrial park sewer infrastructure, city of 
        Chickasha, Oklahoma.
            ``(225) Disney and langley, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 
        for water and sewer improvements and water related 
        infrastructure, cities of Disney and Langley, Oklahoma.
            ``(226) Durant, oklahoma.--$3,300,000 for bayou 
        restoration and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Durant, Oklahoma.
            ``(227) Eastern oklahoma state university, 
        wilberton, oklahoma.--$1,000,000 for sewer and utility 
        upgrades and water related infrastructure, Eastern 
        Oklahoma State University, Wilberton, Oklahoma.
            ``(228) Guymon, oklahoma.--$16,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater related infrastructure, city of Guymon, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(229) Konawa, oklahoma.--$500,000 for water 
        treatment infrastructure improvements, city of Konawa, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(230) Lugert-altus irrigation district, altus, 
        oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure 
        improvements, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District, Altus, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(231) Midwest city, oklahoma.--$2,000,000 for 
        improvements to water related infrastructure, the City 
        of Midwest City, Oklahoma.
            ``(232) Mustang, oklahoma.--$3,325,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Mustang, Oklahoma.
            ``(233) Norman, oklahoma.--$10,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure, Norman, Oklahoma.
            ``(234) Oklahoma panhandle state university, 
        guymon, oklahoma.--$275,000 for water testing facility 
        and water related infrastructure development, Oklahoma 
        Panhandle State University, Guymon, Oklahoma.
            ``(235) Weatherford, oklahoma.--$500,000 for 
        arsenic program and water related infrastructure, city 
        of Weatherford, Oklahoma.
            ``(236) Woodward, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, 
        Woodward, Oklahoma.
            ``(237) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, 
        Oregon.
            ``(238) Beaver creek reservoir, pennsylvania.--
        $3,000,000 for projects for water supply and related 
        activities, Beaver Creek Reservoir, Clarion County, 
        Beaver and Salem Townships, Pennsylvania.
            ``(239) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 
        for wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield 
        Borough, Pennsylvania.
            ``(240) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 
        for stormwater control measures and storm sewer 
        improvements, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(241) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--
        $1,516,584 for wastewater related infrastructure for 
        North Wales Borough, Pennsylvania.
            ``(242) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
            ``(243) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(244) Stockerton borough, tatamy borough, and 
        palmer township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures, particularly to address 
        sinkholes, in the vicinity of Stockerton Borough, 
        Tatamy Borough, and Palmer Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(245) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
            ``(246) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure in the 
        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
            ``(247) Charleston, south carolina.--$4,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer 
        improvements, Spring Street/Fishburne Street drainage 
        project, Charleston, South Carolina.
            ``(248) Charleston and west ashley, south 
        carolina.--$6,000,000 for wastewater tunnel 
        replacement, Charleston and West Ashley, South 
        Carolina.
            ``(249) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south 
        carolina.--$25,000,000 for a project for water storage 
        and water supply infrastructure on Crooked Creek, 
        Marlboro County, South Carolina.
            ``(250) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$18,000,000 
        for environmental infrastructure, including ocean 
        outfalls, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(251) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--
        $11,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including 
        ocean outfalls, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(252) Surfside, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including stormwater 
        system improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South 
        Carolina.
            ``(253) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and 
        ziebach counties) and perkins and meade counties, south 
        dakota.--$65,000,000 for water related infrastructure, 
        Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation (Dewey and Ziebach 
        counties) and Perkins and Meade Counties, South Dakota.
            ``(254) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
            ``(255) Blaine, tennessee.--$500,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Blaine, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(256) Claiborne county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 
        for water supply and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Claiborne County, Tennessee.
            ``(257) Giles county, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure, county of 
        Giles, Tennessee.
            ``(258) Grainger county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Grainger 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(259) Hamilton county, tennessee.--$500,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Hamilton 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(260) Harrogate, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, city of 
        Harrogate, Tennessee.
            ``(261) Johnson county, tennessee.--$600,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Johnson 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(262) Knoxville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, city of 
        Knoxville, Tennessee.
            ``(263) Nashville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Nashville, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(264) Lewis, lawrence, and wayne counties, 
        tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure, counties of Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(265) Oak ridge, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, city of Oak 
        Ridge, Tennessee.
            ``(266) Plateau utility district, morgan county, 
        tennessee.--$1,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Morgan County, Tennessee.
            ``(267) Shelby county, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for 
        water related environmental infrastructure, county of 
        Shelby, Tennessee.
            ``(268) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, 
        Grimes, Hill, Hood, Johnson, Madison, McLennan, 
        Limestone, Robertson, and Somervell Counties, Texas.
            ``(269) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure and resource protection, 
        including stormwater management, and development, El 
        Paso County, Texas.
            ``(270) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, 
        Texas.
            ``(271) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, 
        utah.--$10,800,000 for water related infrastructure, 
        Duchesne, Iron, and Uintah Counties, Utah.
            ``(272) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, 
        Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
        Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, 
        Tucker, Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Ritchie 
        Counties, West Virginia.
            ``(273) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 
        for wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix 
        Anguilla wastewater treatment plant and the St. Thomas 
        Charlotte Amalie wastewater treatment plant, United 
        States Virgin Islands.''.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA.

    (a) Modification.--The project for Hillsboro and Okeechobee 
Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a total 
cost of $42,500,000.
    (b) Treatment.--Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the 
        following: ``The project for aquifer storage and 
        recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, 
        authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), shall be 
        treated for purposes of this section as being in the 
        Plan, except that operation and maintenance costs of 
        the project shall remain a non-Federal 
        responsibility.''; and
            (2) in clause (iii) by inserting after 
        ``subparagraph (B)'' the following: ``and the project 
        for aquifer storage and recovery, Hillsboro and 
        Okeechobee Aquifer''.

SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS.

    Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$69,000,000'' and 
                inserting ``$71,200,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$34,500,000'' each place 
                it appears and inserting ``$35,600,000''; and
            (2) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and 
                inserting ``$8,200,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' each place 
                it appears and inserting ``$4,100,000''.

SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS.

    (a) Maximum Cost of Projects.--Section 601(b)(2)(E) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2683) is 
amended by inserting ``and section (d)'' before the period at 
the end.
    (b) Maximum Cost of Program Authority.--Section 601(c)(3) 
of such Act (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(C) Maximum cost of program authority.--
                Section 902 of the Water Resources Development 
                Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) shall apply to the 
                individual project funding limits in 
                subparagraph (A) and the aggregate cost limits 
                in subparagraph (B).''.

SEC. 6004. CREDIT.

    Section 601(e)(5)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2685) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of 
                subclause (I);
                    (B) by adding ``or'' at the end of 
                subclause (II); and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(III) the credit is provided for 
                        work carried out before the date of the 
                        partnership agreement between the 
                        Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor, 
                        as defined in an agreement between the 
                        Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor 
                        providing for such credit;''; and
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by striking ``design agreement or the 
                project cooperation''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the semicolon the 
                following: ``, including in the case of credit 
                provided under clause (i)(III) conditions 
                relating to design and construction''.

SEC. 6005. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE.

    Section 601(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2691) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) Maximum expenditures.--The Secretary may 
        expend up to $3,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal 
        years beginning after September 30, 2004, to carry out 
        this subsection.''.

SEC. 6006. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and 
        all that follows and inserting ``$95,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the 
        following:
                            ``(ii) Federal share.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--Except 
                                as provided in subclause (II), 
                                the Federal share of the cost 
                                of carrying out a project under 
                                subparagraph (A) shall not 
                                exceed $25,000,000.
                                    ``(II) Seminole water 
                                conservation plan.--The Federal 
                                share of the cost of carrying 
                                out the Seminole water 
                                conservation plan shall not 
                                exceed $30,000,000.''.

SEC. 6007. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete the 
development and testing of the regional engineering model for 
environmental restoration as expeditiously as practicable.
    (b) Usage.--The Secretary shall consider using, as 
appropriate, the regional engineering model for environmental 
restoration in the development of future water resource 
projects, including projects developed pursuant to section 601 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2680).

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Coastal louisiana ecosystem.--The term 
        ``coastal Louisiana ecosystem'' means the coastal area 
        of Louisiana from the Sabine River on the west to the 
        Pearl River on the east, including those parts of the 
        Atchafalaya River Basin and the Mississippi River 
        Deltaic Plain below the Old River Control Structure and 
        the Chenier Plain included within the study area of the 
        restoration plan.
            (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the 
        Governor of the State of Louisiana.
            (3) Restoration plan.--The term ``restoration 
        plan'' means the report of the Chief of Engineers for 
        ecosystem restoration for the Louisiana Coastal Area 
        dated January 31, 2005.
            (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the 
        Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration 
        Task Force established by section 7003.
            (5) Comprehensive plan.--The term ``comprehensive 
        plan'' means the plan developed under section 7002 and 
        any revisions thereto.

SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
Governor, shall develop a comprehensive plan for protecting, 
preserving, and restoring the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (b) Integration of Plan Into Comprehensive Hurricane 
Protection Study.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
Secretary shall integrate the restoration plan into the 
analysis and design of the comprehensive hurricane protection 
study authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
    (c) Consistency With Comprehensive Coastal Protection 
Master Plan.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
Secretary shall ensure that the plan is not inconsistent with 
the goals, analysis, and design of the comprehensive coastal 
protection master plan authorized and defined pursuant to Act 8 
of the First Extraordinary Session of the Louisiana State 
Legislature, 2005.
    (d) Inclusions.--The comprehensive plan shall include a 
description of--
            (1) the framework of a long-term program integrated 
        with hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood damage 
        reduction, and navigation activities that provide for 
        the comprehensive protection, conservation, and 
        restoration of the wetlands, estuaries, barrier 
        islands, shorelines, and related land and features of 
        the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including protection 
        of critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure from 
        the effects of a coastal storm, a hurricane, erosion, 
        or subsidence;
            (2) the means by which a new technology, or an 
        improved technique, can be integrated into the program 
        referred to in paragraph (1);
            (3) the role of other Federal and State agencies 
        and programs in carrying out such program;
            (4) specific, measurable success criteria 
        (including ecological criteria) by which success of the 
        plan will be measured;
            (5) proposed projects in order of priority as 
        determined by their respective potential to contribute 
        to--
                    (A) creation of coastal wetlands; and
                    (B) flood protection of communities ranked 
                by population density and level of protection; 
                and
            (6) efforts by Federal, State, and local interests 
        to address sociological, economic, and related fields 
        of law.
    (e) Considerations.--In developing the comprehensive plan, 
the Secretary shall consider the advisability of integrating 
into the program referred to in subsection (d)(1)--
            (1) an investigation and study of the maximum 
        effective use of the water and sediment of the 
        Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers for coastal 
        restoration purposes consistent with flood control and 
        navigation;
            (2) a schedule for the design and implementation of 
        large-scale water and sediment reintroduction projects 
        and an assessment of funding needs from any source;
            (3) an investigation and assessment of alterations 
        in the operation of the Old River Control Structure, 
        consistent with flood control and navigation purposes;
            (4) any related Federal or State project being 
        carried out on the date on which the plan is developed;
            (5) any activity in the restoration plan; and
            (6) any other project or activity identified in one 
        or more of--
                    (A) the Mississippi River and Tributaries 
                program;
                    (B) the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands 
                Conservation Plan;
                    (C) the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management 
                Plan;
                    (D) the plan of the State of Louisiana 
                entitled ``Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and 
                Hurricane Protection--Louisiana's Comprehensive 
                Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast''; and
                    (E) other relevant reports as determined by 
                the Secretary.
    (f) Reports to Congress.--
            (1) Initial report.--Not later than 1 year after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        submit to Congress a report containing the 
        comprehensive plan.
            (2) Updates.--Not later than 5 years after the date 
        of submission of a report under paragraph (1), and at 
        least once every 5 years thereafter until 
        implementation of the comprehensive plan is complete, 
        the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
        containing an update of the plan and an assessment of 
        the progress made in implementing the plan.

SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
ecosystem restoration, Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana, 
substantially in accordance with the report of the Chief of 
Engineers, dated January 31, 2005.
    (b) Priorities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to--
                    (A) any portion of the program identified 
                in the report described in subsection (a) as a 
                critical restoration feature;
                    (B) any Mississippi River diversion project 
                that--
                            (i) will protect a major population 
                        area of the Pontchartrain, Pearl, 
                        Breton Sound, Barataria, or Terrebonne 
                        basins; and
                            (ii) will produce an environmental 
                        benefit to the coastal Louisiana 
                        ecosystem;
                    (C) any barrier island, or barrier 
                shoreline, project that--
                            (i) will be carried out in 
                        conjunction with a Mississippi River 
                        diversion project; and
                            (ii) will protect a major 
                        population area;
                    (D) any project that will reduce storm 
                surge and prevent or reduce the risk of loss of 
                human life and the risk to public safety; and
                    (E) a project to physically modify the 
                Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and to restore 
                the areas affected by the Mississippi River-
                Gulf Outlet in accordance with the 
                comprehensive plan to be developed under 
                section 7002(a) and consistent with sections 
                7006(c)(1)(A) and 7013.

SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION TASK 
                    FORCE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established a task force to be 
known as the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and 
Restoration Task Force (in this section referred to as the 
``Task Force'').
    (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall consist of the 
following members (or, in the case of the head of a Federal 
agency, a designee of the head of the agency at the level of 
Assistant Secretary or an equivalent level):
            (1) The Secretary.
            (2) The Secretary of the Interior.
            (3) The Secretary of Commerce.
            (4) The Administrator of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency.
            (5) The Secretary of Agriculture.
            (6) The Secretary of Transportation.
            (7) The Secretary of Energy.
            (8) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
        Management Agency.
            (9) The Commandant of the Coast Guard.
            (10) The Chair of the Coastal Protection and 
        Restoration Authority of Louisiana.
            (11) Two representatives of the State of Louisiana 
        selected by the Governor.
    (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall make recommendations to 
the Secretary regarding--
            (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, 
        projects, and activities for addressing conservation, 
        protection, restoration, and maintenance of the coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem;
            (2) financial participation by each agency 
        represented on the Task Force in conserving, 
        protecting, restoring, and maintaining the coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem, including recommendations--
                    (A) that identify funds from current agency 
                missions and budgets; and
                    (B) for coordinating individual agency 
                budget requests; and
            (3) the comprehensive plan to be developed under 
        section 7002(a).
    (d) Report.-- The Task Force shall submit to Congress a 
biennial report that summarizes the activities and 
recommendations of the Task Force.
    (e) Working Groups.--
            (1) General authority.--The Task Force may 
        establish such working groups as the Task Force 
        determines to be necessary to assist the Task Force in 
        carrying out this section.
            (2) Hurricanes katrina and rita.--
                    (A) Integration team.--The Task Force shall 
                establish a working group for the purpose of 
                advising the Task Force of opportunities to 
                integrate the planning, engineering, design, 
                implementation, and performance of Corps of 
                Engineers projects for hurricane and storm 
                damage reduction, flood damage reduction, 
                ecosystem restoration, and navigation in those 
                areas in Louisiana for which a major disaster 
                has been declared by the President as a result 
                of Hurricane Katrina or Rita.
                    (B) Expertise; representation.--In 
                establishing the working group under 
                subparagraph (A), the Task Force shall ensure 
                that the group--
                            (i) has expertise in coastal 
                        estuaries, diversions, coastal 
                        restoration and wetlands protection, 
                        ecosystem restoration, hurricane 
                        protection, storm damage reduction 
                        systems, navigation, and ports; and
                            (ii) represents the State of 
                        Louisiana and local governments in 
                        southern Louisiana.
                    (C) Duties.--In developing its 
                recommendations under this subsection, the 
                working group shall--
                            (i) review reports relating to the 
                        performance of, and recommendations 
                        relating to the future performance of, 
                        the hurricane, coastal, and flood 
                        protection systems in southern 
                        Louisiana, including the reports issued 
                        by the Interagency Performance 
                        Evaluation Team, the National Academy 
                        of Sciences, the National Science 
                        Foundation, the American Society of 
                        Civil Engineers, and Team Louisiana for 
                        the purpose of advising the Task Force 
                        and the Secretary on opportunities to 
                        improve the performance of the 
                        protection systems;
                            (ii) assist in providing reviews 
                        under section 2035; and
                            (iii) carry out such other duties 
                        as the Task Force or the Secretary 
                        determines to be appropriate.
    (f) Compensation.--Members of the Task Force and members of 
a working group established by the Task Force may not receive 
compensation for their services as members of the Task Force or 
working group, as the case may be.
    (g) Travel Expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by members 
of the Task Force and members of a working group established by 
the Task Force, in the performance of their service on the Task 
Force or working group, as the case may be, shall be paid by 
the agency or entity that the member represents.
    (h) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task Force 
or any working group established by the Task Force.

SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the non-
Federal interest of the project involved, shall review each 
Federally-authorized water resources project in the coastal 
Louisiana ecosystem being carried out or completed as of the 
date of enactment of this Act to determine whether the project 
needs to be modified--
            (1) to take into account the program authorized by 
        section 7003 and the projects authorized by sections 
        7006(e) and 7013; or
            (2) to contribute to ecosystem restoration under 
        section 7003, 7006(e), or 7013.
    (b) Modifications.--Subject to subsections (c) and (d), the 
Secretary may carry out the modifications described in 
subsection (a).
    (c) Public Notice and Comment.--Before completing the 
report required under subsection (d), the Secretary shall 
provide an opportunity for public notice and comment.
    (d) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Before modifying an operation or 
        feature of a project under subsection (b), the 
        Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
        modification.
            (2) Inclusion.--A report describing a modification 
        under paragraph (1) shall include such information 
        relating to the timeline for and cost of the 
        modification, as the Secretary determines to be 
        relevant.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Science and Technology.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
        coastal Louisiana ecosystem science and technology 
        program substantially in accordance with the 
        restoration plan at a total cost of $100,000,000.
            (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall 
        be--
                    (A) to identify any uncertainty relating to 
                the physical, chemical, geological, biological, 
                and cultural baseline conditions in the coastal 
                Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (B) to improve knowledge of the physical, 
                chemical, geological, biological, and cultural 
                baseline conditions in the coastal Louisiana 
                ecosystem;
                    (C) to identify and develop technologies, 
                models, and methods to carry out this 
                subsection; and
                    (D) to advance and expedite the 
                implementation of the comprehensive plan.
            (3) Working groups.--The Secretary may establish 
        such working groups as the Secretary determines to be 
        necessary to assist the Secretary in carrying out this 
        subsection.
            (4) Contracts and cooperative agreements.--In 
        carrying out this subsection, the Secretary may enter 
        into a contract or cooperative agreement with a 
        consortium of academic institutions in Louisiana with 
        scientific or engineering expertise in the restoration 
        of aquatic and marine ecosystems for coastal 
        restoration and enhancement through science and 
        technology.
            (5) Applicability of the federal advisory committee 
        act.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
        App.) shall not apply to a working group established 
        under this subsection.
    (b) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary may carry out demonstration projects 
        substantially in accordance with the restoration plan 
        and within the coastal Louisiana ecosystem for the 
        purpose of resolving critical areas of scientific or 
        technological uncertainty related to the implementation 
        of the comprehensive plan.
            (2) Maximum cost.--
                    (A) Total cost.--The total cost for 
                planning, design, and construction of all 
                projects under this subsection shall not exceed 
                $100,000,000.
                    (B) Individual project.--The total cost of 
                any single project under this subsection shall 
                not exceed $25,000,000.
    (c) Initial Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        carry out the following projects substantially in 
        accordance with the restoration plan:
                    (A) Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet 
                environmental restoration at a total cost of 
                $105,300,000, but not including those elements 
                of the project that produce navigation 
                benefits.
                    (B) Small diversion at Hope Canal at a 
                total cost of $68,600,000.
                    (C) Barataria basin barrier shoreline 
                restoration at a total cost of $242,600,000.
                    (D) Small Bayou Lafourche reintroduction at 
                a total cost of $133,500,000.
                    (E) Medium diversion at Myrtle Grove with 
                dedicated dredging at a total cost of 
                $278,300,000.
            (2) Modifications.--
                    (A) In general.--In carrying out each 
                project under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
                shall carry out such modifications as may be 
                necessary to the ecosystem restoration features 
                identified in the restoration plan--
                            (i) to address the impacts of 
                        Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the 
                        areas of the project; and
                            (ii) to ensure consistency with the 
                        project authorized by section 7013 
                        (including work in and around the 
                        vicinity of the Mississippi River-Gulf 
                        Outlet).
                    (B) Integration.--The Secretary shall 
                ensure that each modification under 
                subparagraph (A) is taken into account in 
                conducting the study of comprehensive hurricane 
                protection authorized by title I of the Energy 
                and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
                (119 Stat. 2247).
                    (C) Mississippi river-gulf outlet.--In 
                carrying out the project under paragraph 
                (1)(A), the Secretary shall carry out such 
                modifications as may be necessary to make the 
                project consistent with and complementary to 
                the closure and restoration of the Mississippi 
                River-Gulf Outlet authorized by section 7013.
            (3) Construction reports.--Before the Secretary may 
        begin construction of any project under this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall submit a report 
        documenting any modifications to the project, including 
        cost changes, to the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
        Senate.
            (4) Applicability of other provisions.--
        Notwithstanding section 902 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), the cost of a 
        project under this subsection, including any 
        modifications to the project, shall not exceed 150 
        percent of the cost of such project set forth in 
        paragraph (1).
    (d) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, substantially in 
        accordance with the restoration plan, shall implement 
        in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem a program for the 
        beneficial use of material dredged from federally 
        maintained waterways at a total cost of $100,000,000.
            (2) Consideration.--In carrying out the program 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the 
        beneficial use of sediment from the Illinois River 
        System for wetlands restoration in wetlands-depleted 
        watersheds of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (e) Additional Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        carry out the following projects referred to in the 
        restoration plan if the Secretary determines such 
        projects are feasible:
                    (A) Land Bridge between Caillou Lake and 
                the Gulf of Mexico at a total cost of 
                $56,300,000.
                    (B) Gulf Shoreline at Point Au Fer Island 
                at a total cost of $43,400,000.
                    (C) Modification of Caernarvon Diversion at 
                a total cost of $20,700,000.
                    (D) Modification of Davis Pond Diversion at 
                a total cost of $64,200,000.
            (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2009, the 
        Secretary shall submit feasibility reports on the 
        projects described in paragraph (1) to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate.
            (3) Projects subject to reports.--
                    (A) Feasibility reports.--Not later than 
                December 31, 2008, the Secretary shall submit 
                to Congress feasibility reports on the 
                following projects referred to in the 
                restoration plan:
                            (i) Multipurpose Operation of Houma 
                        Navigation Lock at a total cost of 
                        $18,100,000.
                            (ii) Terrebonne Basin Barrier 
                        Shoreline Restoration at a total cost 
                        of $124,600,000.
                            (iii) Small Diversion at Convent/
                        Blind River at a total cost of 
                        $88,000,000.
                            (iv) Amite River Diversion Canal 
                        Modification at a total cost of 
                        $5,600,000.
                            (v) Medium Diversion at White's 
                        Ditch at a total cost of $86,100,000.
                            (vi) Convey Atchafalaya River Water 
                        to Northern Terrebonne Marshes at a 
                        total cost of $221,200,000.
                    (B) Construction.--The Secretary may carry 
                out the projects under subparagraph (A) 
                substantially in accordance with the plans and 
                subject to the conditions, recommended in a 
                final report of the Chief of Engineers if a 
                favorable report of the Chief is completed by 
                not later than December 31, 2010.
            (4) Construction.--No appropriations shall be made 
        to construct any project under this subsection if the 
        report under paragraph (2) or paragraph (3), as the 
        case may be, has not been approved by resolutions 
        adopted by the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
        Senate.

SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.

    (a) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a study or project 
under this title the cost of work carried out in the coastal 
Louisiana ecosystem by the non-Federal interest for the project 
before the date of the execution of the partnership agreement 
for the study or project.
    (b) Sources of Funds.--The non-Federal interest may use, 
and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal 
agency under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or 
in part, the non-Federal share of the cost of the study or 
project if the Federal agency that provides the funds 
determines that the funds are authorized to be used to carry 
out the study or project.
    (c) Nongovernmental Organizations.--A nongovernmental 
organization shall be eligible to contribute all or a portion 
of the non-Federal share of the cost of a project under this 
title.
    (d) Treatment of Credit Between Projects.--Any credit 
provided under this section toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of a study or project under this title may be applied 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of any other study or 
project under this title.
    (e) Periodic Monitoring.--
            (1) In general.--To ensure that the contributions 
        of the non-Federal interest equal the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of a study or project under this title 
        during each 5-year period beginning after the date of 
        commencement of the first study or project under this 
        title, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) monitor for each study or project under 
                this title the non-Federal provision of cash, 
                in-kind services and materials, and land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
                disposal areas; and
                    (B) manage the requirement of the non-
                Federal interest to provide for each such study 
                or project cash, in-kind services and 
                materials, and land, easements, rights-of-way, 
                relocations, and disposal areas.
            (2) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct 
        monitoring separately for the study phase, construction 
        phase, preconstruction engineering and design phase, 
        and planning phase for each project authorized on or 
        after the date of enactment of this Act for all or any 
        portion of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (f) Audits.--Credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and disposal areas (including land value and 
incidental costs) provided under this section, and the cost of 
work provided under this section, shall be subject to audit by 
the Secretary.

SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision 
of law, in carrying out any project or activity under this 
title or any other provision of law to protect, conserve, and 
restore the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, the Secretary may 
determine that--
            (1) the project or activity is justified by the 
        environmental benefits derived by the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem; and
            (2) no further economic justification for the 
        project or activity shall be required if the Secretary 
        determines that the project or activity is cost 
        effective.
    (b) Limitation on Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not 
apply to any separable element of a project intended to produce 
benefits that are predominantly unrelated to the protection, 
preservation, and restoration of the coastal Louisiana 
ecosystem.

SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.

    The Secretary shall establish a council, to be known as the 
``Louisiana Water Resources Council'', which shall serve as the 
exclusive peer review panel for activities conducted by the 
Corps of Engineers in the areas in the State of Louisiana 
declared as major disaster areas in accordance with section 401 
of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in response to Hurricane 
Katrina or Rita of 2005, in accordance with the requirements of 
section 2034.

SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of 
the reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary 
determines that a project is feasible, proceed directly to 
project preconstruction engineering and design:
            (1) The projects identified in the study of 
        comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by title 
        I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
        Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2447).
            (2) The projects identified in the Southwest 
        Coastal Louisiana hurricane and storm damage reduction 
        study authorized by the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on 
        December 7, 2005.
    (b) Submission of Reports.--Upon completion of the reports 
identified in subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit the 
reports to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 7011. REPORTING.

    Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate a report, including a description of--
            (1) the projects authorized and undertaken under 
        this title;
            (2) the construction status of the projects;
            (3) the cost to date and the expected final cost of 
        each project undertaken under this title; and
            (4) the benefits and environmental impacts of the 
        projects.

SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to--
            (1) raise levee heights where necessary and 
        otherwise enhance the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity 
        project and the West Bank and Vicinity project to 
        provide the level of protection necessary to achieve 
        the certification required for a 100-year level of 
        flood protection in accordance with the national flood 
        insurance program under the base flood elevations 
        current at the time of construction of the levee;
            (2) modify the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue, and 
        London Avenue drainage canals in the city of New 
        Orleans and install pumps and closure structures at or 
        near the lakefront at Lake Pontchartrain;
            (3) armor critical elements of the New Orleans 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction system;
            (4) modify the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to 
        increase the reliability of the flood protection system 
        for the city of New Orleans;
            (5) replace or modify certain non-Federal levees in 
        Plaquemines Parish to incorporate the levees into the 
        New Orleans to Venice Hurricane Protection project;
            (6) reinforce or replace flood walls in the 
        existing Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and 
        the existing West Bank and Vicinity project to improve 
        performance of the flood and storm damage reduction 
        systems;
            (7) perform one time stormproofing of interior pump 
        stations to ensure the operability of the stations 
        during hurricanes, storms, and high water events;
            (8) repair, replace, modify and improve non-Federal 
        levees and associated protection measures in Terrebonne 
        Parish; and
            (9) reduce the risk of storm damage to the greater 
        New Orleans metropolitan area by restoring the 
        surrounding wetlands through measures to begin to 
        reverse wetland losses in areas affected by navigation, 
        oil and gas, and other channels and through 
        modification of the Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion 
        structure or its operations.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Activities authorized by subsection (a) 
and section 7013 shall be carried out in a manner that is 
consistent with the cost-sharing requirements specified in the 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the 
Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 
109-234).
    (c) Conditions.--The Secretary shall notify the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate if estimates for the expenditure of funds 
on any single project or activity identified in subsection (a) 
exceeds the amount specified for that project or activity in 
the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the 
Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006. No 
appropriation in excess of 25 percent above the amount 
specified for a project or activity in such Act may be made 
until an increase in the level of expenditure has been approved 
by resolutions adopted by the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.

SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET.

    (a) Deauthorization.--
            (1) In general.--Effective beginning on the date of 
        submission of the plan required under paragraph (3), 
        the navigation channel portion of the Mississippi 
        River-Gulf Outlet element of the project for 
        navigation, Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf 
        of Mexico, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act to 
        authorize construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf 
        outlet'', approved March 29, 1956 (70 Stat. 65) and 
        modified by section 844 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4177) and section 
        326 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
        Stat. 3717), which extends from the Gulf of Mexico to 
        Mile 60 at the southern bank of the Gulf Intracoastal 
        Waterway, is not authorized.
            (2) Scope.--Nothing in this paragraph modifies or 
        deauthorizes the Inner Harbor navigation canal 
        replacement project authorized by that Act of March 29, 
        1956.
            (3) Closure and restoration plan.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                a final report on the deauthorization of the 
                Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, as described 
                under the heading ``Investigations'' under 
                chapter 3 of title II of the Emergency 
                Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, 
                the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
                Recovery, 2006 (120 Stat. 453).
                    (B) Inclusions.--At a minimum, the report 
                under subparagraph (A) shall include--
                            (i) a plan to physically modify the 
                        Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and 
                        restore the areas affected by the 
                        navigation channel;
                            (ii) a plan to restore natural 
                        features of the ecosystem that will 
                        reduce or prevent damage from storm 
                        surge;
                            (iii) a plan to prevent the 
                        intrusion of saltwater into the 
                        waterway;
                            (iv) efforts to integrate the 
                        recommendations of the report with the 
                        program authorized under section 7003 
                        and the analysis and design authorized 
                        by title I of the Energy and Water 
                        Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
                        (119 Stat. 2247); and
                            (v) consideration of--
                                    (I) use of native 
                                vegetation; and
                                    (II) diversions of fresh 
                                water to restore the Lake 
                                Borgne ecosystem.
            (4) Construction.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
        plan to close the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and 
        restore and protect the ecosystem substantially in 
        accordance with the plan required under paragraph (3), 
        if the Secretary determines that the project is cost-
        effective, environmentally acceptable, and technically 
        feasible.

SEC. 7014. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) Reports.--With respect to the projects identified in 
the analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection 
authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247), the Secretary shall 
submit, to the maximum extent practicable, specific project 
recommendations in a report developed under that title.
    (b) Emergency Procedures.--
            (1) In general.--If the President determines that a 
        project recommended in the analysis and design of 
        comprehensive hurricane protection under title I of the 
        Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
        could--
                    (A) address an imminent threat to life and 
                property;
                    (B) prevent a dangerous storm surge from 
                reaching a populated area;
                    (C) prevent the loss of coastal areas that 
                reduce the impact of storm surge;
                    (D) benefit national energy security;
                    (E) protect emergency hurricane evacuation 
                routes or shelters; or
                    (F) address inconsistencies in hurricane 
                protection standards,
        the President may submit to the President pro tempore 
        of the Senate for authorization a legislative proposal 
        relating to the project, as the President determines to 
        be appropriate.
            (2) Prioritization.--In submitting legislative 
        proposals under paragraph (1), the President shall give 
        priority to any project that, as determined by the 
        President, would--
                    (A) to the maximum extent practicable, 
                reduce the risk--
                            (i) of loss of human life;
                            (ii) to public safety; and
                            (iii) of damage to property; and
                    (B) minimize costs and environmental 
                impacts.
            (3) Expedited consideration.--
                    (A) In general.--Beginning after December 
                31, 2008, any legislative proposal submitted by 
                the President under paragraph (1) shall be 
                eligible for expedited consideration in 
                accordance with this paragraph.
                    (B) Introduction.--As soon as practicable 
                after the date of receipt of a legislative 
                proposal under paragraph (1), the Chairman of 
                the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
                of the Senate shall introduce the proposal as a 
                bill, by request, in the Senate.
                    (C) Referral.--A bill introduced under 
                subparagraph (B) shall be referred to the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
                the Senate.
                    (D) Committee consideration.--
                            (i) In general.--Not later than 45 
                        legislative days after a bill under 
                        subparagraph (B) is referred to the 
                        committee in accordance with 
                        subparagraph (C), the committee shall 
                        act on the bill.
                            (ii) Failure to act.--If the 
                        committee fails to act on a bill by the 
                        date specified in clause (i), the bill 
                        shall be discharged from the committee 
                        and placed on the calendar of the 
                        Senate.
            (4) Effective date.--The requirements of, and 
        authorities under, this subsection shall expire on 
        December 31, 2010.

SEC. 7015. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a report describing any modification required 
to the project for flood damage reduction, Larose to Golden 
Meadow, Louisiana, to provide the level of protection necessary 
to achieve the certification required for a 100-year level of 
flood protection in accordance with the national flood 
insurance program.
    (b) Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to carry 
out a modification described in subsection (a) if--
            (1) the Secretary determines that the modification 
        in the report under subsection (a) is feasible; and
            (2) the total cost of the modification does not 
        exceed $90,000,000.
    (c) Requirement.--No appropriation shall be made to 
construct any modification under this section if the report 
under subsection (a) has not been approved by resolutions 
adopted by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 7016. LOWER JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
flood damage reduction in Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.
    (b) Existing Studies.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, 
existing studies for projects for flood damage reduction in the 
vicinity of Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, prepared under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (c) Construction.--The Secretary may proceed to 
construction or complete the construction of projects in Lower 
Jefferson Parish if the projects are being developed or carried 
out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as of 
the date of enactment of this Act.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $100,000,000 to carry out this section.

   TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

SEC. 8001. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the project for 
        navigation and ecosystem improvements for the Upper 
        Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 15, 2004.
            (2) Upper mississippi river and illinois waterway 
        system.--The term ``Upper Mississippi River and 
        Illinois Waterway System'' means the projects for 
        navigation and ecosystem restoration authorized by 
        Congress for--
                    (A) the segment of the Mississippi River 
                from the confluence with the Ohio River, River 
                Mile 0.0, to Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock in 
                Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, River Mile 
                854.0; and
                    (B) the Illinois Waterway from its 
                confluence with the Mississippi River at 
                Grafton, Illinois, River Mile 0.0, to T.J. 
                O'Brien Lock in Chicago, Illinois, River Mile 
                327.0.

SEC. 8002. NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS AND RESTORATION.

    Except as modified by this title, the Secretary shall 
undertake navigation improvements and restoration of the 
ecosystem for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
System substantially in accordance with the Plan and subject to 
the conditions described therein.

SEC. 8003. AUTHORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Small Scale and Nonstructural Measures.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    (A) construct mooring facilities at Locks 
                12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 24, and LaGrange Lock or 
                other alternative locations that are 
                economically and environmentally feasible;
                    (B) provide switchboats at Locks 20 through 
                25; and
                    (C) conduct development and testing of an 
                appointment scheduling system.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total 
        cost of projects authorized under this subsection shall 
        be $256,000,000. Such costs are to be paid \1/2\ from 
        amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
        Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Such sums shall remain 
        available until expended.
    (b) New Locks.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct new 
        1,200-foot locks at Locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the 
        Upper Mississippi River and at LaGrange Lock and Peoria 
        Lock on the Illinois Waterway.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total 
        cost of projects authorized under this subsection shall 
        be $1,948,000,000. Such costs are to be paid \1/2\ from 
        amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
        Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Such sums shall remain 
        available until expended.
    (c) Concurrence.--The mitigation required for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), including any 
acquisition of lands or interests in lands, shall be undertaken 
or acquired concurrently with lands and interests in lands for 
the projects authorized under subsections (a) and (b), and 
physical construction required for the purposes of mitigation 
shall be undertaken concurrently with the physical construction 
of such projects.

SEC. 8004. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Operation.--To ensure the environmental sustainability 
of the existing Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
System, the Secretary shall modify, consistent with 
requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, the 
operation of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
System to address the cumulative environmental impacts of 
operation of the system and improve the ecological integrity of 
the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River.
    (b) Ecosystem Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, 
        consistent with requirements to avoid adverse effects 
        on navigation, ecosystem restoration projects to attain 
        and maintain the sustainability of the ecosystem of the 
        Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River in 
        accordance with the general framework outlined in the 
        Plan.
            (2) Projects included.--Ecosystem restoration 
        projects may include--
                    (A) island building;
                    (B) construction of fish passages;
                    (C) floodplain restoration;
                    (D) water level management (including water 
                drawdown);
                    (E) backwater restoration;
                    (F) side channel restoration;
                    (G) wing dam and dike restoration and 
                modification;
                    (H) island and shoreline protection;
                    (I) topographical diversity;
                    (J) dam point control;
                    (K) use of dredged material for 
                environmental purposes;
                    (L) tributary confluence restoration;
                    (M) spillway, dam, and levee modification 
                to benefit the environment; and
                    (N) land and easement acquisition.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraphs (B) and (C), the Federal share of 
                the cost of carrying out an ecosystem 
                restoration project under this subsection shall 
                be 65 percent.
                    (B) Exception for certain restoration 
                projects.--In the case of a project under this 
                section for ecosystem restoration, the Federal 
                share of the cost of carrying out the project 
                shall be 100 percent if the project--
                            (i) is located below the ordinary 
                        high water mark or in a connected 
                        backwater;
                            (ii) modifies the operation of 
                        structures for navigation; or
                            (iii) is located on federally owned 
                        land.
                    (C) Savings clause.--Nothing in this 
                subsection affects the applicability of section 
                906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act 
                of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)).
                    (D) Nongovernmental organizations.--In 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for 
                any project carried out under this title, a 
                non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit 
                entity, with the consent of the affected local 
                government.
            (4) Land acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire 
        land or an interest in land for an ecosystem 
        restoration project from a willing seller through 
        conveyance of--
                    (A) fee title to the land; or
                    (B) a flood plain conservation easement.
    (c) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall carry out a long term 
resource monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, 
and applied research program for the Upper Mississippi River 
and Illinois River to determine trends in ecosystem health, to 
understand systemic changes, and to help identify restoration 
needs. The program shall consider and adopt the monitoring 
program established under section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
652(e)(1)(A)(ii)).
    (d) Ecosystem Restoration Preconstruction Engineering and 
Design.--
            (1) Restoration design.--Before initiating the 
        construction of any individual ecosystem restoration 
        project, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) establish ecosystem restoration goals 
                and identify specific performance measures 
                designed to demonstrate ecosystem restoration;
                    (B) establish the without-project condition 
                or baseline for each performance indicator; and
                    (C) for each separable element of the 
                ecosystem restoration, identify specific target 
                goals for each performance indicator.
            (2) Outcomes.--Performance measures identified 
        under paragraph (1)(A) shall include specific 
        measurable environmental outcomes, such as changes in 
        water quality, hydrology, or the well-being of 
        indicator species the population and distribution of 
        which are representative of the abundance and diversity 
        of ecosystem-dependent aquatic and terrestrial species.
            (3) Restoration design.--Restoration design carried 
        out as part of ecosystem restoration shall include a 
        monitoring plan for the performance measures identified 
        under paragraph (1)(A), including--
                    (A) a timeline to achieve the identified 
                target goals; and
                    (B) a timeline for the demonstration of 
                project completion.
    (e) Consultation and Funding Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the environmental 
        sustainability, ecosystem restoration, and monitoring 
        activities authorized in this section, the Secretary 
        shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior and 
        the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and 
        Wisconsin.
            (2) Funding agreements.--The Secretary is 
        authorized to enter into agreements with the Secretary 
        of the Interior, the Upper Mississippi River Basin 
        Association, and natural resource and conservation 
        agencies of the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, 
        Missouri, and Wisconsin to provide for the direct 
        participation of and transfer of funds to such entities 
        for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of 
        projects and programs established by this section.
    (f) Specific Projects Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out this subsection 
        $1,717,000,000, of which not more than $245,000,000 
        shall be available for projects described in subsection 
        (b)(2)(B) and not more than $48,000,000 shall be 
        available for projects described in subsection 
        (b)(2)(J). Such sums shall remain available until 
        expended.
            (2) Limitation on available funds.--Of the amounts 
        made available under paragraph (1), not more than 
        $35,000,000 in any fiscal year may be used for land 
        acquisition under subsection (b)(4).
            (3) Individual project limit.--Other than for 
        projects described in subparagraphs (B) and (J) of 
        subsection (b)(2), the total cost of any single project 
        carried out under this subsection shall not exceed 
        $25,000,000.
            (4) Monitoring.--In addition to amounts authorized 
        under paragraph (1), there are authorized $10,420,000 
        per fiscal year to carry out the monitoring program 
        under subsection (c) if such sums are not appropriated 
        pursuant to section 1103(e)(4) the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(4)).
    (g) Implementation Reports.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than June 30, 2009, and 
        every 4 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to 
        the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an 
        implementation report that--
                    (A) includes baselines, milestones, goals, 
                and priorities for ecosystem restoration 
                projects; and
                    (B) measures the progress in meeting the 
                goals.
            (2) Advisory panel.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                appoint and convene an advisory panel to 
                provide independent guidance in the development 
                of each implementation report under paragraph 
                (1).
                    (B) Panel members.--Panel members shall 
                include--
                            (i) one representative of each of 
                        the State resource agencies (or a 
                        designee of the Governor of the State) 
                        from each of the States of Illinois, 
                        Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and 
                        Wisconsin;
                            (ii) one representative of the 
                        Department of Agriculture;
                            (iii) one representative of the 
                        Department of Transportation;
                            (iv) one representative of the 
                        United States Geological Survey;
                            (v) one representative of the 
                        United States Fish and Wildlife 
                        Service;
                            (vi) one representative of the 
                        Environmental Protection Agency;
                            (vii) one representative of 
                        affected landowners;
                            (viii) two representatives of 
                        conservation and environmental advocacy 
                        groups; and
                            (ix) two representatives of 
                        agriculture and industry advocacy 
                        groups.
                    (C) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall serve 
                as chairperson of the advisory panel.
                    (D) Application of federal advisory 
                committee act.--The Advisory Panel and any 
                working group established by the Advisory Panel 
                shall not be considered an advisory committee 
                under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
                U.S.C. App.).
    (h) Ranking System.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the Advisory Panel, shall develop a system to rank 
        proposed projects.
            (2) Priority.--The ranking system shall give 
        greater weight to projects that restore natural river 
        processes, including those projects listed in 
        subsection (b)(2).

SEC. 8005. COMPARABLE PROGRESS.

    (a) In General.--As the Secretary conducts pre-engineering, 
design, and construction for projects authorized under this 
title, the Secretary shall--
            (1) select appropriate milestones;
            (2) determine, at the time of such selection, 
        whether the projects are being carried out at 
        comparable rates; and
            (3) make an annual report to Congress, beginning in 
        fiscal year 2009, regarding whether the projects are 
        being carried out at a comparable rate.
    (b) No Comparable Rate.--If the Secretary or Congress 
determines under subsection (a)(2) that projects authorized 
under this title are not moving toward completion at a 
comparable rate, annual funding requests for the projects shall 
be adjusted to ensure that the projects move toward completion 
at a comparable rate in the future.

                TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

SEC. 9001. SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``National Levee Safety Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 9002. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Committee.--The term ``committee'' means the 
        Committee on Levee Safety established by section 
        9003(a).
            (2) Inspection.--The term ``inspection'' means an 
        actual inspection of a levee--
                    (A) to establish the global information 
                system location of the levee;
                    (B) to determine the general condition of 
                the levee; and
                    (C) to estimate the number of structures 
                and population at risk and protected by the 
                levee that would be adversely impacted if the 
                levee fails or water levels exceed the height 
                of the levee.
            (3) Levee.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``levee'' means 
                an embankment, including floodwalls--
                            (i) the primary purpose of which is 
                        to provide hurricane, storm, and flood 
                        protection relating to seasonal high 
                        water, storm surges, precipitation, and 
                        other weather events; and
                            (ii) that normally is subject to 
                        water loading for only a few days or 
                        weeks during a year.
                    (B) Inclusion.--The term includes 
                structures along canals that constrain water 
                flows and are subject to more frequent water 
                loadings but that do not constitute a barrier 
                across a watercourse.
            (4) State.--The term ``State'' means--
                    (A) a State;
                    (B) the District of Columbia;
                    (C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and
                    (D) any other territory or possession of 
                the United States.
            (5) State levee safety agency.--The term ``State 
        levee safety agency'' means the agency of a State that 
        has regulatory authority over the safety of any non-
        Federal levee in the State.
            (6) United states.--The term ``United States'', 
        when used in a geographical sense, means all of the 
        States.

SEC. 9003. COMMITTEE ON LEVEE SAFETY.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established a committee to be 
known as the ``Committee on Levee Safety''.
    (b) Membership.--The committee shall be composed of 16 
members as follows:
            (1) The Secretary (or the Secretary's designee), 
        who shall serve as the chairperson of the Committee.
            (2) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
        Management Agency (or the Administrator's designee).
            (3) The following 14 members appointed by the 
        Secretary:
                    (A) 8 representatives of State levee safety 
                agencies, one from each of the 8 civil works 
                divisions of the Corps of Engineers.
                    (B) 2 representatives of the private sector 
                who have expertise in levee safety.
                    (C) 2 representatives of local and regional 
                governmental agencies who have expertise in 
                levee safety.
                    (D) 2 representatives of Indian tribes who 
                have expertise in levee safety.
    (c) Duties.--
            (1) Development of recommendations for national 
        levee safety program.--The committee shall develop 
        recomendations for a national levee safety program, 
        including a strategic plan for implementation of the 
        program.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, the committee shall submit to 
        the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
        a report containing the recommendations developed under 
        paragraph (1).
    (d) Purposes.--In developing recommendations under 
subsection (c)(1), the committee shall ensure that the national 
levee safety program meets the following goals:
            (1) Ensuring the protection of human life and 
        property by levees through the development of 
        technologically, economically, socially, and 
        environmentally feasible programs and procedures for 
        hazard reduction and mitigation relating to levees.
            (2) Encouraging use of the best available 
        engineering policies and procedures for levee site 
        investigation, design, construction, operation and 
        maintenance, and emergency preparedness.
            (3) Encouraging the establishment and 
        implementation of an effective national levee safety 
        program that may be delegated to qualified States for 
        implementation, including identification of incentives 
        and disincentives for State levee safety programs.
            (4) Ensuring that levees are operated and 
        maintained in accordance with appropriate and 
        protective standards by conducting an inventory and 
        inspection of levees.
            (5) Developing and supporting public education and 
        awareness projects to increase public acceptance and 
        support of State and national levee safety programs.
            (6) Building public awareness of the residual risks 
        associated with living in levee protected areas.
            (7) Developing technical assistance materials for 
        State and national levee safety programs.
            (8) Developing methods to provide technical 
        assistance relating to levee safety to non-Federal 
        entities.
            (9) Developing technical assistance materials, 
        seminars, and guidelines relating to the physical 
        integrity of levees in the United States.
    (e) Compensation of Members.--A member of the committee 
shall serve without compensation.
    (f) Travel Expenses.--To the extent amounts are made 
available in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary 
shall reimburse a member of the committee for travel expenses, 
including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized 
for an employee of a Federal agency under subchapter I of 
chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from the 
home or regular place of business of the member in performance 
of services for the committee.
    (g) Applicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply 
to the committee.

SEC. 9004. INVENTORY AND INSPECTION OF LEVEES.

    (a) Levee Database.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        establish and maintain a database with an inventory of 
        the Nation's levees.
            (2) Contents.--The database shall include--
                    (A) location information of all Federal 
                levees in the Nation (including global 
                information system information) and, for non-
                Federal levees, such information on levee 
                location as is provided to the Secretary by 
                State and local governmental agencies;
                    (B) utilizing such information as is 
                available, the general condition of each levee; 
                and
                    (C) an estimate of the number of structures 
                and population at risk and protected by each 
                levee that would be adversely impacted if the 
                levee fails or water levels exceed the height 
                of the levee.
            (3) Availability of information.--
                    (A) Availability to federal, state, and 
                local governmental agencies.--The Secretary 
                shall make all of the information in the 
                database available to appropriate Federal, 
                State, and local governmental agencies.
                    (B) Availability to the public.--The 
                Secretary shall make the information in the 
                database described in paragraph (2)(A), and 
                such other information in the database as the 
                Secretary determines appropriate, available to 
                the public.
    (b) Inventory and Inspection of Levees.--
            (1) Federal levees.--The Secretary, at Federal 
        expense, shall establish an inventory and conduct an 
        inspection of all federally owned and operated levees.
            (2) Federally constructed, nonfederally operated 
        and maintained levees.--The Secretary shall establish 
        an inventory and conduct an inspection of all federally 
        constructed, non-federally operated and maintained 
        levees, at the original cost share for the project.
            (3) Participating levees.--For non-Federal levees 
        the owners of which are participating in the emergency 
        response to natural disasters program established under 
        section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
        construction of certain public works on rivers and 
        harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
        approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), the 
        Secretary shall establish an inventory and conduct an 
        inspection of each such levee if the owner of the levee 
        requests such inspection. The Federal share of the cost 
        of an inspection under this paragraph shall be 65 
        percent.

SEC. 9005. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this title shall be construed as--
            (1) creating any liability of the United States or 
        its officers or employees for the recovery of damages 
        caused by an action or failure to act; or
            (2) relieving an owner or operator of a levee of a 
        legal duty, obligation, or liability incident to the 
        ownership or operation of a levee.

SEC. 9006. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to 
carry out this title $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 
through 2013.
      And the Senate agree to the same.

                From the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure, for consideration of the House 
                bill and the Senate amendment, and 
                modifications committed to conference:
                                   James L. Oberstar,
                                   Eddie Bernice Johnson,
                                   Ellen O. Tauscher,
                                   Brian Baird,
                                   Brian Higgins,
                                   Harry E. Mitchell,
                                   Steve Kagen,
                                   Jerry McNerney,
                                   John L. Mica,
                                   John J. Duncan, Jr.,
                                   Vernon J. Ehlers,
                                   R.H. Baker,
                                   Henry E. Brown, Jr.,
                                   John Boozman,
                From the Committee on Natural Resources, for 
                consideration of secs. 2014, 2023, and 6009 of 
                the House bill and secs. 3023, 5008, and 5016 
                of the Senate amendment, and modifications 
                committed to conference:
                                   Nick Rahall,
                                   Grace F. Napolitano,
                                   Cathy McMorris Rodgers,
                                 Managers on the Part of the House.

                                   Barbara Boxer,
                                   Max Baucus,
                                   Joe Lieberman,
                                   Tom Carper,
                                   Hillary Rodham Clinton,
                                   Frank R. Lautenberg,
                                   James M. Inhofe,
                                   John Warner,
                                   George V. Voinovich,
                                   Johnny Isakson,
                                   David Vitter,
                                Managers on the Part of the Senate.
       JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE

      The managers on the part of the House and the Senate at 
the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on 
the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1495), to provide 
for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct 
various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the 
United States, and for other purposes, submit the following 
joint statement to the House and the Senate in explanation of 
the effect of the action agreed upon by the managers and 
recommended in the accompanying conference report:
      The Senate amendment struck all of the House bill after 
the enacting clause and inserted a substitute text.
      The House recedes from its disagreement to the amendment 
of the Senate with an amendment that is a substitute for the 
House bill and the Senate amendment. The differences between 
the House bill, the Senate amendment, and the substitute agreed 
to in conference are noted below, except for clerical 
corrections, conforming changes made necessary by agreements 
reached by the conferees, and minor drafting and clarifying 
changes.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

                  SECTION 1001--PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

      1001(1). Haines, Alaska. House Sec. 1001(1), Senate 
Sec. 1001(1).--Senate recedes.
      1001(2). Port Lions, Alaska. House Sec. 1001(2). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1001(3). Santa Cruz River, Paseo de Las Iglesias, 
Arizona. House Sec. 1001(4). No comparable Senate Section.--
Senate recedes.
      1001(4). Tanque Verde Creek, Pima County, Arizona. House 
Sec. 1001(5), Senate Sec. 1001(2).--House recedes.
      1001(5). Salt River (Rio Salado Oeste), Maricopa County, 
Arizona. House Sec. 1001(3). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1001(6). Salt River (Va Shly'ay Akimel), Maricopa County, 
Arizona. House Sec. 1001(6), Senate Sec. 1001(3).--House 
recedes, with an amendment.
      1001(7). May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas. House 
Sec. 1001(7), Senate Sec. 1001(4).--House recedes.
      1001(8). Hamilton City, Glenn County, California. House 
Sec. 1001(8), Senate Sec. 1001(5).--House recedes.
      1001(9). Silver Strand Shoreline, Imperial Beach, 
California. House Sec. 1001(9), Senate 1001(6).--House recedes.
      1001(10). Matilija Dam, Ventura County, California. House 
Sec. 1001(10), Senate 1001(7).--House recedes.
      1001(11). Middle Creek, Lake County, California. House 
Sec. 1001(11), Senate 1001 Sec. 1001(8).--House recedes.
      1001(12). Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, California. 
House Sec. 1001(12), Senate Sec. 1001(9).--Senate recedes.
      1001(13). Denver County Reach, South Platte River, 
Denver, Colorado. House Sec. 1001(13), Senate Sec. 1001(10).--
Senate recedes.
      1001(14). Central and Southern Florida, Indian River 
Lagoon. House Sec. 6005, Senate Sec. 1001 (12).--House recedes.
      1001(15). Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
Central and Southern Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration 
Project, Collier County, Florida. House Sec. 6005, Senate 
Sec. 1001(14).--House recedes.
      1001(16). Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
Central and Southern Florida, Site 1 Impoundment Project, Palm 
Beach County, Florida. House Sec. 6005, Senate Sec. 1001(11).--
House recedes.
      1001(17). Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida. House 
Sec. 1001(14), Senate Sec. 1001(13).--Senate recedes.
      1001(18). East St. Louis and Vicinity, Illinois. House 
Sec. 1001(15), Senate Sec. 1001(15).--Senate recedes.
      1001(19). Peoria Riverfront Development, Illinois. House 
Sec. 1001(16), Senate Sec. 1001(16).--House recedes.
      1001(20). Wood River Levee System Reconstruction, Madison 
County, Illinois. House Sec. 1001(17), Senate 1001(17).--House 
recedes.
      1001(21). Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines, 
Iowa. House Sec. 1001(18), Senate 1001(18).--Senate recedes.
      1001(22). Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, Kentucky. House 
Sec. 1001(19). No comparable Senate Section.--Senate recedes.
      1001(23). Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana. House 
Sec. 1001(20), Senate 1001(19).--House recedes.
      1001(24). Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana. 
House Sec. 1001(21), Senate Sec. 1001(20).--House recedes.
      1001(25). Port of Iberia, Louisiana. House Sec. 1001(22), 
Senate Sec. 1001(21).--House recedes, with an amendment.
      1001(26). Smith Island, Somerset County, Maryland. House 
Sec. 1001(23), Senate Sec. 1001(23).--House recedes.
      1001(27). Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota. House 
Sec. 1001(24), Senate Sec. 1001(24).--Senate recedes.
      1001(28). Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, 
and North Kansas Levees Units, Missouri River and Tributaries 
at Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kansas. House Sec. 1001(26), 
Senate Sec. 1001(26).--House recedes.
      1001(29). Swope Park Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas 
City, Missouri. House Sec. 1001(27), Senate Sec. 1001(27).--
Senate recedes.
      1001(30). Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New 
Jersey. House Sec. 1001(28), Senate 1001(28).--House recedes.
      1001(31). Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, New 
Jersey. House Sec. 1001(29), Senate Sec. 1001(29).--Senate 
recedes.
      1001(32). New Jersey Shore Protection Study, Manasquan 
Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey. House Sec. 1001(30), 
Senate Sec. 1001(30).--Senate recedes.
      1001(33). Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, 
New Jersey. House Sec. 1001(31), Senate Sec. 1001(31).--House 
recedes.
      1001(34). South River, Raritan River Basin, New Jersey. 
House Sec. 1001(32), Senate Sec. 1001(32).--House recedes.
      1001(35). Southwest Valley, Bernalillo County, New 
Mexico. House Sec. 1001(33), Senate Sec. 1001(33).--House 
recedes.
      1001(36). Montauk Point, New York. House Sec. 1001(34), 
Senate Sec. 1001(34).--Senate recedes.
      1001(37). Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio. House 
Sec. 1001(35), Senate Sec. 1001(35).--House recedes, with an 
amendment.
      1001(38). Town of Bloomsburg, Columbia County, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1001(36), Senate Sec. 1001(36).--
Senate recedes.
      1001(39). Pawleys Island, South Carolina. House 
Sec. 1001(37), Senate Sec. 1001(37).--Senate recedes.
      1001(40). Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, 
Texas. House Sec. 1001(38), Senate 1001(38).--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.
      1001(41). Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to 
Port O'Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas. House 
Sec. 1001(39), Senate Sec. 1001(39).--House recedes.
      1001(42). Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, High Island to 
Brazos River, Texas. House Sec. 1001(40), Senate 
Sec. 1001(40).--House recedes.
      1001(43). Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas. 
House Sec. 1001(41), Senate Sec. 1001(41).--Senate recedes.
      1001(44). Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge 
Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia. House 
Sec. 1001(43), Senate Sec. 1001(43).--Senate recedes.
      1001(45). Craney Island Eastward Expansion, Norfolk 
Harbor and Channels, Hampton Roads, Virginia. House 
Sec. 1001(44), Senate Sec. 1001(42).--House recedes, with an 
amendment.
      1001(46). Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, 
Washington. Senate Sec. 1001(44). No comparable House 
section.--House recedes.

          SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION

      1002(a)(1). Haleyville, Alabama. House Sec. 1002(a)(1). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(2). Weiss Lake, Alabama. House Sec. 1002(a)(2). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(3). Fort Yukon, Alaska. House Sec. 5032. No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.
      1002(a)(4). Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(5). Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(4), Senate Sec. 1004(1).--Same.
      1002(a)(6). Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, California. 
House Sec. 1002(a)(5). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(7). Borrego Springs, California. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(6). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(8). Colton, California. House Sec. 1002(a)(7). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(9). Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(8). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(10). Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California. 
House Sec. 1002(a)(9). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(11). Ontario and Chino, California. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(12). Santa Venetia, California. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(13). Whittier, California. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(12). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(14). Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(15). Bibb County and City of Macon Levee, 
Georgia. Senate Sec. 1004(2). No comparable House section.--
House recedes.
      1002(a)(16). Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana. Senate 
Sec. 1004(3). House Sec. 3051.--House recedes, with an 
amendment.
      1002(a)(17). St. Francisville, Louisiana. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(14). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(18). Salem, Massachusetts. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(15), Senate 1004(4).--Same.
      1002(a)(19). Cass River, Michigan. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(16). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(20). Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(17), Senate Sec. 1004(5).--Same.
      1002(a)(21). Marsh Creek, Minnesota. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(18). No comparable Senate Section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(22). South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, 
Minnesota. House Sec. 1002(a)(19), Senate Sec. 1004(6).--Same.
      1002(a)(23). Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri. 
House Sec. 1002(a)(20). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(24). Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(21). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(25). Canisteo River, Addison, New York. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(22). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(26). Cohocton River, Campbell, New York. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(23). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(27). Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New York. 
House Sec. 1002(a)(24). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(28). East River, Silver Beach, New York City, New 
York. House Sec. 1002(a)(25). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(29). East Valley Creek, Andover, New York. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(26). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(30). Sunnyside Brook, Westchester County, New 
York. House Sec. 1002(a)(27). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(31). Little Yankee and Mud Run, Trumbull County, 
Ohio. House Sec. 1002(a)(28). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(32). Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrington, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(29). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(33). Southampton Creek Watershed, Southampton, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(30). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(34). Spring Creek, Lower Macungie Township, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(31). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(35). Yardley Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, 
Yardley, Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(32). No comparable 
Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(36). Surfside Beach, South Carolina. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(33). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(37). Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee. 
Senate Sec. 3113. No comparable House section.--House recedes, 
with an amendment.
      1002(a)(38). Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas. House 
Sec. 1002(a)(34). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1002(a)(39). Dilley, Texas. House Sec. 1002(a)(35). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1002(a)(40). Cheyenne, Wyoming. Senate Sec. 1004(7). No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.

     SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION

      1003(1). Aliso Creek, California. House Sec. 1003(1). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(2). St. Johns Bluff Training Wall, Duval County, 
Florida. House Sec. 1003(2). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(3). Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Iberville Parish, 
Louisiana. House Sec. 1003(3). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(4). Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and 
Louisiana. House Sec. 1003(4). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(5). Piney Point Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, 
Maryland. House Sec. 1003(5). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(6). Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota. House Sec. 1003(6). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(7). Middle Fork Grand River, Gentry County, 
Missouri. House Sec. 1003(7). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(8). Platte River, Platte City, Missouri. House 
Sec. 1003(8). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(9). Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri. House 
Sec. 1003(9). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(10). Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland County, New 
York. House Sec. 1003(10). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(11). Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, New York. House 
Sec. 1003(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(12). Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New 
Windsor, New York. House Sec. 1003(12). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(13). Owego Creek, Tioga County, New York. House 
Sec. 1003(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(14). Howard Road Outfall, Shelby County, Tennessee. 
House Sec. 1003(14). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1003(15). Mitch Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, 
Tennessee. House Sec. 1003(15). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(16). Wolf River Tributaries, Shelby County, 
Tennessee. House Sec. 1003(16). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1003(17). Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. House 
Sec. 1003(17). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1003(18). Wells River, Newbury, Vermont. House 
Sec. 1003(18). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

                SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION

      1004(a)(1). Barrow Harbor, Alaska. Senate Sec. 1005(1). 
No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(2). Coffman Cove, Alaska. House Sec. 5030. No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.
      1004(a)(3). Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska. House Sec. 5033. No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.
      1004(a)(4). Nome Harbor, Alaska. Senate Sec. 1005(2). No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(5). Old Harbor, Alaska. Senate Sec. 1005(3). No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(6). Little Rock Port, Arkansas. Senate 
Sec. 1005(4). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(7). Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana. 
House Sec. 1004(a)(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1004(a)(8). East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
Massachusetts. House Sec. 1004(a)(2), Senate 1005(5).--Same.
      1004(a)(9). Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts. House 
Sec. 1004(a)(3), Senate Sec. 1005(6).--Same.
      1004(a)(10). Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts. 
House Sec. 1004(a)(4), Senate Sec. 1005(7).--Same.
      1004(a)(11). Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, 
Massachusetts. House Sec. 1004(a)(5), Senate Sec. 1005(8).--
Same.
      1004(a)(12). Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, 
Massachusetts. House Sec. 1004(a)(6), Senate Sec. 1005(9).--
Same.
      1004(a)(13). Au Sable River, Michigan. House 
Sec. 1004(a)(7), Senate Sec. 1005(10).--Same.
      1004(a)(14). Clinton River, Michigan. Senate 
Sec. 1005(11). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(15). Ontonagon River, Michigan. Senate 
Sec. 1005(12). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(16). Outer Channel and Inner Harbor, Menominee 
Harbor, Michigan and Wisconsin. Senate Sec. 1005(16). No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(17). Sebewaing River, Michigan. Senate 
Sec. 1005(14). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1004(a)(18). Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, 
Michigan. House Sec. 1004(a)(8), Senate Sec. 1005(13).--Same.
      1004(a)(19). Tower Harbor, Tower Minnesota. House 
Sec. 1004(a)(9), Senate Sec. 1005(15).--Same.
      1004(a)(20). Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York. House 
Sec. 1004(a)(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1004(a)(21). Milwaukee Harbor, Wisconsin. Senate 
Sec. 1005(18). No comparable House section.--House recedes.

    SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                              ENVIRONMENT

      1005(1). Ballona Creek, Los Angeles County, California. 
House Sec. 1005(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1005(2). Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Ray, 
California. House Sec. 1005(2). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1005(3). Ft. George Inlet, Duval County, Florida. House 
Sec. 1005(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1005(4). Rathbun Lake, Iowa. House Sec. 1005(4). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1005(5). Smithville Lake, Missouri. House Sec. 1005(5). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1005(6). Delaware Bay, New Jersey and Delaware. House 
Sec. 1005(6). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1005(7). Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pennsylvania. House 
Sec. 1005(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

      SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

      1006(a)(1). Cypress Creek, Montgomery, Alabama. House 
Sec. 1006(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(2). Black Lake, Alaska. House Sec. 1006(2), 
Senate Sec. 1006(1).--Same.
      1006(a)(3). Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, California. House 
Sec. 1006(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(4). Dockweiler Bluffs, Los Angeles County, 
California. House Sec. 1006(5). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(5). Salt River, California. House Sec. 1006(6). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(6). San Diego River, California. Senate 
Sec. 1006(2). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1006(a)(7). Santa Rosa Creek, Santa Rosa, California. 
House Sec. 1006(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1006(a)(8). Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and Lower 
San Joaquin River, California. House Sec. 1006(8). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(9). Suisun Marsh, San Pablo Bay, California. 
Senate Sec. 1006(3). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      1006(a)(10). Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, 
California. House Sec. 1006(9). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(11). Biscayne Bay, Florida. House Sec. 1006(10). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(12). Clam Bayou and Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel 
Island, Florida. House Sec. 1006(11). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(13). Mountain Park, Georgia. Senate 
Sec. 2037(a)(2)(A). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      1006(a)(14). Chattahoochee Fall Line, Georgia and 
Alabama. House Sec. 1006(12), Senate Sec. 1006(4).--Senate 
recedes.
      1006(a)(15). Longwood Cove, Gainesville, Georgia. House 
Sec. 1006(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(16). City Park, University Lakes, Louisiana. 
House Sec. 1006(15). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1006(a)(17). Lawrence Gateway, Massachusetts. Senate 
Sec. 1006(5). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1006(a)(18). Milford Pond, Milford, Massachusetts. Senate 
Sec. 1006(7). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1006(a)(19). Mill Pond, Littleton, Massachusetts. House 
Sec. 1006(16), Senate Sec. 1006(6).--Same.
      1006(a)(20). Pine Tree Brook, Milton, Massachusetts. 
House Sec. 1006(17), Senate Sec. 1006(8).--Same.
      1006(a)(21). Clinton River, Michigan. Senate 
Sec. 1006(9). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1006(a)(22). Kalamazoo River Watershed, Battle Creek, 
Michigan. House Sec. 1006(18). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(23). Rush Lake, Minnesota. House Sec. 1006(19). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(24). South Fork of the Crow River, Hutchinson, 
Minnesota. House Sec. 1006(20). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(25). St. Louis, Missouri. House Sec. 1006(21). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(26). Mobley Dam, Tongue River, Montana. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      1006(a)(27). S and H Dam, Tongue River, Montana. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      1006(a)(28). Vandalia Dam, Milk River, Montana. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      1006(a)(29). Truckee River, Reno, Nevada. House 
Sec. 1006(22). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(30). Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey. House 
Sec. 1006(23). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(31). Caldwell County, North Carolina. Senate 
Sec. 1006(10). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1006(a)(32). Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Senate 
Sec. 1006(11). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1006(a)(33). Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio. House 
Sec. 1006(24). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(34). Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon. House 
Sec. 1006(25), Senate Sec. 1006(12).--Same.
      1006(a)(35). Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1006(26). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(36). Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, Pennsylvania. 
House Sec. 1006(27). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      1006(a)(37). Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 5003(a)(5). Senate 
Sec. 2037(a)(2)(E).--House recedes.
      1006(a)(38). Saucon Creek, Northampton County, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1006(28). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(39). Stillwater Lake Dam, Monroe County, 
Pennsylvania. Senate Sec. 2037(a)(2)(F), House 
Sec. 5003(a)(7).--House recedes.
      1006(a)(40). Blackstone River, Rhode Island. House 
Sec. 1006(29), Senate Sec. 1006(13).--Same.
      1006(a)(41). Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South Carolina. House 
Sec. 1006(30). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(42). White River, Bethel, Vermont. House 
Sec. 1006(31). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1006(a)(43). College Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia. Senate 
Sec. 1006(14). No comparable Senate section.--House recedes.

           SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION

      1007(1). Nelson Lagoon, Alaska. House Sec. 1007(1). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1007(2). Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, California. Senate 
Sec. 4006. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      1007(3). Sanibel Island, Florida. House Sec. 1007(2). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1007(4). Apra Harbor, Guam. House Sec. 1007(3). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1007(5). Piti, Cabras Island, Guam. House Sec. 1007(4). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      1007(6). Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, 
Brooklyn, New York. House Sec. 1007(5). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1007(7). Delaware River, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1007(7). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      1007(8). Port Aransas, Texas. House Sec. 1007(8). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

      SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL

      1008. Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, 
New York. House Sec. 1008. No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.

   SEC. 1009. SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DAMAGE CAUSED BY 
                          NAVIGATION PROJECTS

      1009(1). Tybee Island, Georgia. Senate Sec. 1007(1). 
House Sec. 4032. House recedes.
      1009(2). Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana. Senate 
Sec. 1007(2). House Sec. 5069. House recedes.

          SEC. 1010. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL

      1010. Republican River Basin, Nebraska. Senate Sec. 1008. 
No comparable House section.--House recedes, with an amendment.

                      TITLE 2--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                  SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS

      House Sec. 2001, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 2002. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS

      House Sec. 2003, Senate Sec. 2017. Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.
      The Managers recognize the importance of efficient and 
effective processing of permits by the Corps of Engineers for 
activities affecting federally regulated waters, including 
wetlands, in compliance with the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). Congress included a 
provision in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (Pub. 
L. 106-541, Sec. 214) to expedite the permit processing time 
for nonfederal public entities.
      The Managers also recognize the findings and 
recommendations of the May 2007 report of the United States 
Government Accountability Office (``GAO''), entitled ``Corps of 
Engineers Needs To Ensure That Permit Decisions Made Using 
Funds From Nonfederal Public Entities Are Transparent and 
Impartial'' (GAO-07-478). In this report, GAO emphasized the 
importance of transparency and impartiality in permit reviews 
and decisionmaking, and ensuring that all of the Corps' 
District offices follow internal Corps' Headquarters guidance 
on maintaining impartial decisionmaking, including, at a 
minimum, that all Corps District offices provide that permits 
decisions under section 214 are reviewed at least by one level 
above the decisionmaker, that all final permit decisions are 
made available electronically, that the Corps not eliminate any 
procedures or decisions that would otherwise be required for 
the type of project under consideration, and that the Corps 
comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The GAO report 
also expressed concern that certain Corps districts have 
allowed private companies to submit permit applications under 
section 214, in contravention to the intent of this authority.
      Although GAO was not able to conclude definitively 
whether permitting processing times have decreased under the 
section 214 program, the report does recognize some benefits 
reported by participating non-Federal public entities, 
including the potential for reduced cost and time for permit 
processing for those entities that have contributed funds to 
the program, and improved communication between participating 
entities and the Corps.
      The Managers intend to conduct additional oversight on 
the implementation of this program before the authority for 
this program expires in 2009.

       SEC. 2003. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

      House Sec. 2009, Senate Sec. 2001, 2023, and 2039.--
Senate recedes.

                     SEC. 2004. COMPILATION OF LAWS

      House Sec. 2011, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 2005. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL

      House Sec. 2012, Senate Sec. 3089.--Senate recedes.

               SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS

      House Sec. 2015, Senate Sec. 2038.--Senate recedes.

                 SEC. 2007. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS

      House Sec. 2018, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

   SEC. 2008. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; COST SHARING

      House Sec. 2019, 2020, 2035. No comparable Senate 
sections.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.

   SEC. 2009. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION

      House Sec. 2021, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 2010. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS

      House Sec. 2022, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                 SEC. 2011. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

      House Sec. 2023, Senate Sec. 2027.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                    SEC. 2012. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING

      House Sec. 2024, Senate Sec. 2022.--Same.

                    SEC. 2013. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

      House Sec. 2025, Senate Sec. 2009.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                        SEC. 2014. LAKES PROGRAM

      House Sec. 2026, Senate Sec. 5001.--House and Senate with 
comparable sections, combine list of House and Senate projects.
      This section amends section 602(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 to add the following locations to the 
Lakes Program: Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois; McCarter 
Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey; Rogers Pond, Franklin 
Township, New Jersey; Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey; 
Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina; Lake Sakakawea, North 
Dakota; Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania; Lake Fairlee, Vermont; 
and Lake Morley, Vermont.

                   SEC. 2015. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS

      House Sec. 2029, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                       SEC. 2016. TRAINING FUNDS

      House Sec. 2030, Senate Sec. 2003.--Same.

                SEC. 2017. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA

      House Sec. 2031, Senate Sec. 2010.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                  SEC. 2018. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS

      House Sec. 2032, Senate Sec. 2014.--Senate recedes.

                       SEC. 2019. ABILITY TO PAY

      House Sec. 2033, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 2020. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION

      House Sec. 2006, Senate Sec. 2033, 2035, and 2037.--
Senate recedes, with an amendment.
      The Managers recognize the importance of projects for the 
restoration of salt-water estuaries and for the rehabilitation 
and removal of dams in improving aquatic ecosystems and the 
environment. The Managers recognize that such projects are 
typically eligible under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
      This section amends section 206 to explicitly authorize 
projects that improve elements and features of an estuary (as 
defined in section 103 of the Estuaries and Clean Waters Act of 
2000 (33 U.S.S. 2902)) and projects for the removal of dams, 
that otherwise meet the requirements of section 206.

            SEC. 2021. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS

      House Sec. 2007, Senate Sec. 2040.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

         SEC. 2022. SMALL RIVER AND HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

      Senate Sec. 2031, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

SEC. 2023. PROTECTION OF HIGHWAYS, BRIDGE APPROACHES, PUBLIC WORKS, AND 
                       NONPROFIT PUBLIC SERVICES

      Senate Sec. 2032, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

 SEC. 2024. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
                            THE ENVIRONMENT

      House Sec. 2008, Senate Sec. 2034.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

             SEC. 2025. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES

      Senate Sec. 2036, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.
      In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall give 
priority to the Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine Clean-up project in 
Contra Costa County, California.

                      SEC. 2026. LEASING AUTHORITY

      House Sec. 2034, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 2027. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT

      Senate Sec. 2004, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

             SEC. 2028. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM

      House Sec. 2041, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

SEC. 2029. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
                      OF HARBOR DREDGING PROJECTS

      House Sec. 2043, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

       SEC. 2030. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY

      Senate Sec. 2002, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

          SEC. 2028. WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES

      House Sec. 2036, Senate Sec. 2006.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

              SEC. 2032. WATER RESOURCE PRIORITIES REPORT

      Senate Sec. 2006(d), No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                          SEC. 2033. PLANNING

      Senate Sec. 2005, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                   SEC. 2034. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW

      Senate Sec. 2007, House Sec. 2037.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.
      Section 2034 provides that project studies shall be 
subject to peer review by an independent panel of experts, as 
provided in this section. The conference agreement is a 
combination of independent peer review proposals passed by the 
Senate and the House of Representatives. The managers believe 
that the conference agreement improves upon both the House and 
Senate proposals to create a strong, workable, and independent 
process for review of project studies carried out by the Corps 
of Engineers. For example, the conference agreement authorizes 
the independent peer review to run concurrent with the project 
study period, and requires that the peer review panel remain 
beyond the release of the independent peer review report to 
allow the expertise gained during the review period to be 
utilized by the Corps up to the release of the draft report of 
the Chief of Engineers.
      This section establishes two categories for independent 
peer review--project studies for which independent peer review 
is mandatory, and project studies for which such review is 
discretionary. This section provides for mandatory review of 
project studies that have an estimated total cost of more than 
$45 million, project studies for which the Governor of an 
affected state requests an independent peer review, and project 
studies that the Chief of Engineers determines are 
controversial. In determining whether a project is 
controversial, the Chief of Engineers must consider whether 
there is significant public dispute as to the size, nature, or 
effects of the proposed project, and whether there is 
significant public dispute as to the economic or environmental 
costs or benefits of the proposed project.
      Section 2034(a)(3)(B) provides for discretionary 
independent peer review of project studies for which the head 
of a Federal or state agency charged with reviewing the project 
study determines that the proposed project is likely to have a 
significant adverse impact on environmental, cultural, or other 
natural resources under the jurisdiction of the agency after 
implementation of the proposed mitigation plans. This section 
provides that the Chief of Engineers must reach a decision 
whether to conduct an independent peer review of such project 
studies within 21 days of a receipt of a request by the head of 
the Federal or state agency. In the event that the Chief of 
Engineers decides not to conduct a discretionary independent 
peer review, the head of the Federal or state agency that 
requested the review may appeal this decision to the Chairman 
of the Council on Environmental Quality (``CEQ''). The Chairman 
of CEQ must reach a decision on whether an independent peer 
review must be conducted for the project study with 30 days of 
receipt of an appeal. In the event that the Chief of Engineers 
decides not to conduct an independent peer review, the Chief of 
Engineers must make the reasons for not conducting the review 
publicly available, including on the Internet.
      Section 2034 permits the Chief of Engineers to exclude a 
very limited number of project studies from independent peer 
review. The managers expect that project studies that could be 
excluded from independent peer review are so limited in scope 
or impact, that they would not significantly benefit from an 
independent peer review.
      Sections 2034(a)(5)(A) and (B) establish criteria for the 
Chief of Engineers to exclude a project study that is subject 
to independent peer review because its estimated total costs 
exceed $45 million. The managers expect that these criteria 
allow the Chief of Engineers to exclude from independent peer 
review only those project studies for which there is no 
controversy, a lack of significant impact to cultural, 
historical, or tribal resources, a lack of substantial adverse 
impacts to fish and wildlife species or habitat, and a lack of 
an impact on endangered or threatened species under the 
Endangered Species Act, or involve projects that, in essence, 
replace existing components of ongoing projects within the same 
footprint as the original project, or have minimal risk to life 
or public safety.
      Project studies subject to independent peer review based 
on the request of the Governor of an affected State may not be 
excluded from review.
      Section 2034(a)(5)(C) authorizes the Chief of Engineers 
to exclude the small project studies developed under certain of 
the Corps of Engineers continuing authorities programs; 
however, such project studies could be subject to independent 
peer review under the factors established under section 
2034(a)(3)(A).
      Sections 2034(a)(2) and 2034(d) establish the duties of 
the independent peer review panel and the scope of review for a 
project study. The managers have defined the scope of review 
broadly to allow the independent review panel to examine all of 
the economic and environmental assumptions and projections, 
project evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental 
analyses, engineering analyses, formulation of alternative 
plans, methods for integrating risk and uncertainty, models 
used in evaluation of economic or environmental impacts of 
proposed projects, and any biological opinions of the project 
study. The managers expect the independent peer review panel to 
review those components of a project study for which the panel 
believes there is a reason for review. The managers do not 
expect the independent peer review panel to review components 
of the project study where the panel determines there is no 
controversy, disagreement, or concern.
      Sections 2034(b) and 2034(e)(1)(A) establish the timing 
of the independent peer review. The managers expect that, in 
all cases, the independent peer review will occur during the 
period beginning on the date of the signing of the feasibility 
cost-sharing agreement, and will be conducted concurrent with 
the development of the project study by the Corps of Engineers. 
The managers believe that having the independent peer review 
carried out concurrently with the development of the project 
study will allow the independent peer review panel to receive 
relevant information from the Corps, on a timely basis, and 
allow the independent peer review panel to provide ongoing 
input into the development of the project study. The managers 
expect that this process will provide the independent peer 
review panel with sufficient information to conduct its review, 
as well as allow the peer review panel to recommend mid-course 
corrections to the ongoing project study, and avoid the 
potential for significant issues or delay to arise at the end 
of the project study period. The managers recognize that the 
recommendations of the independent peer review panel are 
advisory; however, the managers expect the Corps to give full 
consideration to the findings of the independent peer review 
panel.
      Section 2034(e)(1)(A) provides that the independent peer 
review panel conclude its peer review, and submit a report to 
the Chief of Engineers, not more than 60 days after the close 
of the public comment period for the draft project study. The 
Chief of Engineers may extend the period for the peer review 
panel to conclude its peer review if the Chief of Engineers 
determines that additional time is necessary. The managers have 
included language to terminate the peer review panel on the 
date of the initiation of the State and agency review, which is 
conterminous with the release of the draft Report of the Chief 
of Engineers for the project, and which is after the issuance 
of the peer review report. The managers recognize that the 
Corps of Engineers intends to allow a member or members of the 
peer review panel to participate on the Civil Works Review 
Board, which requires District Commanders to present their 
final reports and recommendations for review. The managers have 
included language to keep the independent peer review impaneled 
beyond the issuance of the peer review report to allow a member 
of the peer review panel to participate on the Civil Works 
Review Board, and to be available as experts, if needed, for 
additional consultation with the Corps of Engineers on the 
project study.

                   SEC. 2035. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW

      Senate Sec. 2007(d), No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

    SEC. 2036. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE AND WETLANDS LOSSES

      House Sec. 2013 and 2014, Senate Sec. 2008.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.
      Section 2036 amends section 906(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 with more explicit mitigation 
requirements and to specify the elements that must be 
identified in a mitigation plan required under that section.
      This section requires the Secretary to mitigate losses to 
flood damage reduction capabilities and losses to fish and 
wildlife of the project area. The specific mitigation plan must 
include a description of the physical action to be undertaken. 
The plan also must include a description of the lands or 
interests in lands to be acquired for mitigation, and the basis 
for a determination that such lands are available. This 
description is not intended to be a description of the specific 
property interests, but the plan must describe how the 
mitigation will be implemented.
      The managers expect the mitigation plan to identify the 
quantity and type of lands needed, and include a determination 
that lands of such quantity and type are available for 
acquisition. The plan also must include the type, amount, and 
characteristics of the habitat to be restored. The plan must 
include success criteria based on replacement of lost functions 
and values of the habitat, including hydrologic and vegetative 
characteristics. Finally, if monitoring is necessary to 
determine success of the mitigation, the plan must include a 
plan for monitoring and to the extent practicable, 
identification of the entities responsible for monitoring. As 
monitoring is part of operation and maintenance of a project, 
in most cases the entity responsible for any monitoring will be 
the non-Federal sponsor. If such person is not identifiable at 
the time the mitigation plan is prepared under this section, 
such person must be identified in the partnership agreement 
entered into with the non-Federal interest.
      The managers support more specificity in Corps reporting 
documents concerning expected mitigation efforts. Such 
increased specificity will better inform the Congress, the non-
Federal sponsor, and the public as to planned mitigation 
efforts and the likely success of these efforts. This section 
also directs the Secretary to submit to Congress a report on 
the status of mitigation concurrent with the submission of 
reports on the status of project construction, as part of the 
President's budget submission.
      Section 2036(c) directs the Secretary, when carrying out 
water resources projects, to first consider the use of a 
mitigation bank if the bank has sufficient and appropriate 
(including ecologically appropriate) credit to offset the 
impact, and the mitigation bank meets certain criteria. To the 
maximum extent practicable, the service area of the mitigation 
bank shall be in the same watershed as the project activity for 
which mitigation is required.
      Nothing in this section affects the responsibility of the 
Corps of Engineers to apply the regulatory guidelines developed 
under section 404(b)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (40 CFR Part 230) related to mitigation sequencing.

                SEC. 2037. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT

      House Sec. 2016, Senate Sec. 2012.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.
      This section amends section 204 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), and includes a new 
subsection (f) that directs the Secretary to give priority to 
regional sediment management projects in the following 
locations: Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas; Fletcher 
Cove, California; Egmont Key, Florida; Calcasieu Ship Channel, 
Louisiana; Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and Pennsylvania; 
Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York; Smith Point Park 
Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 Memorial, Brookhaven, New York; 
Morehead City, North Carolina; Toledo Harbor, Lucas County, 
Ohio; Galveston Bay, Texas; and Benson Beach, Washington.

   SEC. 2038. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

      House Sec. 2005 and 2004, Senate Sec. 2013.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

              SEC. 2039. MONITORING ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

      Senate Sec. 2015, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

        SEC. 2040. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS

      Senate Sec. 2018, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 2041. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

      Senate Sec. 2024, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 2042. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

      Senate Sec. 2025, No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

      SEC. 2043. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

      House Sec. 2038, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 2044. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
                                ACTIONS

      House Sec. 2027, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                    SEC. 2045. PROJECT STREAMLINING

      House Sec. 2028, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                   SEC. 2046. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION

      Senate Sec. 2028, House Sec. 3123(f).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

                   SEC. 2047. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES

      House Sec. 2042, Senate Sec. 2020.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

           SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA

      Senate Sec. 3003. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                     SEC. 3002. COOK INLET, ALASKA

      House Sec. 3001. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3003. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA

      House Sec. 3002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3004. SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA

      Senate Sec. 4001. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                        SEC. 3005. SITKA, ALASKA

      House Sec. 3003, Senate Sec. 3002.--Same.

                      SEC. 3006. TATITLEK, ALASKA

      House Sec. 3004. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 3007. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA

      House Sec. 3005, Senate Sec. 3005.--Same.

 SEC. 3008. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, ARIZONA

      Senate Sec. 3004. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                SEC. 3009. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, ARIZONA

      Senate Sec. 3006. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 3010. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS

      House Sec. 3006. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI

      Senate Sec. 3010. House Sec. 5043.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                 SEC. 3012. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS

      House Sec. 3007. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

   SEC. 3013. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 3009. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                SEC. 3014. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3013. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

            SEC. 3015. CALFED STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3014. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 3016. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3009. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 3017. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3010, Senate Sec. 2016(1).--Senate recedes.

                SEC. 3018. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3011, Senate Sec. 3015.--Senate recedes.

  SEC. 3019. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
                               CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3012. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      The managers recommend that the Secretary and the Chief 
of Engineers expedite the completion of the ongoing General 
Reevaluation Report for the San Francisco Bay to Stockton 
project.

                  SEC. 3020. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3013. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 3021. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3014, Senate Sec. 3017.--Senate recedes.

                  SEC. 3022. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3015, Senate Sec. 3018.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                  SEC. 3023. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3016, Senate Sec. 3019.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

        SEC. 3024. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3017. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 3025. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3020. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3026. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3018. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3027. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3019. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 3028. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3029. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      The managers recognize the importance of annual operation 
and maintenance of navigation channels and note that the work 
addressed in this section can be addressed under existing 
statutory authorities. The managers do not intend to address 
the operation and maintenance of every navigation project 
through the enactment of additional statutory language, but 
expect the Corps to address the maintenance dredging needs of 
authorized projects under existing statutory authorities.

  SEC. 3029. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3008 and 3020, Senate Sec. 3023.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

       SEC. 3030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3019. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 3031. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3024. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

             SEC. 3032. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3026. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

            SEC. 3033. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA

      No comparable Senate or House section.

   SEC. 3034. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3027. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                SEC. 3035. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3022. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3023, Senate Sec. 2016(2).--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.

              SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3025, Senate Sec. 3028.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

              SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3025, Senate Sec. 2016(3).--Senate recedes.

         SEC. 3039. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3026. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 3040. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3027, Senate Sec. 2016(5).--Senate recedes.

            SEC. 3041. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 3028, Senate Sec. 3029.--Senate recedes.

             SEC. 3042. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO

      House Sec. 3029. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 3043. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
                         DELAWARE AND MARYLAND

      House Sec. 3030. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 3044. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE

      Senate Sec. 3033. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3045. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3031, Senate Sec. 3035.--Senate recedes.

         SEC. 3046. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3032. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3047. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3033. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

           SEC. 3048. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3034. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              SEC. 3049. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3036, Senate Sec. 3038.--Senate recedes.

                   SEC. 3050. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3038. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3051. PORT SUTTON, FLORIDA

      Senate Sec. 3039. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

           SEC. 3052. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3039. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3053. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 3040, Senate Sec. 3040.--Senate recedes.

                   SEC. 3054. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA

      House Sec. 3041, Senate Sec. 3041.--House recedes.

             SEC. 3055. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA

      House Sec. 3042. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3056. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO

      Senate Sec. 3042, House Sec. 3043.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

              SEC. 3057. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO

      Senate Sec. 3043. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

   SEC. 3058. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3044. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3059. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3045, Senate Sec. 3045.--Same.

                   SEC. 3060. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3046, Senate Sec. 3046.--Same.

SEC. 3061. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
                                ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3047, Senate Sec. 5015.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                      SEC. 3062. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3048. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 3063. LASALLE, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3049. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3064. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 3050, Senate Sec. 3050.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                     SEC. 3065. CEDAR LAKE, INDIANA

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                    SEC. 3066. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA

      House Sec. 3052. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3067. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA

      House Sec. 3053. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

            SEC. 3068. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA

      House Sec. 3054. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

                      SEC. 3069. PERRY CREEK, IOWA

      Senate Sec. 3145. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                     SEC. 3070. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA

      House Sec. 3055, Senate Sec. 3146.--Same.

            SEC. 3071. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY

      Senate Sec. 3054. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         SEC. 3072. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA

      Senate Sec. 3055. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3073. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 3056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 3074. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
                            PARISH WATERSHED

      House Sec. 3057, Senate Sec. 3059.--Senate recedes.

        SEC. 3075. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 3059 and 3062, Senate Sec. 3056.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

SEC. 3076. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, REGIONAL VISITOR CENTER, 
                               LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 3058, Senate Sec. 3057.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

   SEC. 3077. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, 
                               LOUISIANA

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                 SEC. 3078. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 3056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 3079. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 3058. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

     SEC. 3080. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 3061, Senate Sec. 3061.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

             SEC. 3081. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 3063. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    SEC. 3082. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET RELOCATION ASSISTANCE, 
                               LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 3060. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                      SEC. 3083. VIOLET, LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 3076. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

 SEC. 3084. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
                               LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 3065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3085. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE

      House Sec. 3066, Senate Sec. 3062.--Senate recedes.

                    SEC. 3086. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND

      Senate Sec. 3069. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3087. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND

      Senate Sec. 1001(22). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

         SEC. 3088. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 3067. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 3089. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 3067, Senate Sec. 3074.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                 SEC. 3090. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 3065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 3091. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 3070, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      The Managers recognize the importance of constructing a 
second lock at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, to enhance overall 
national security by avoiding any potential disruption to Great 
Lakes, national, and international shipping that would occur in 
the event of a shutdown or terrorist attack at the existing 
lock. The Secretary is directed to carry out the project, as 
expeditiously as practicable, without regard to normal policy 
considerations.

                       SEC. 3092. ADA, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3071. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

           SEC. 3093. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3072, Senate Sec. 3075.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                   SEC. 3094. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 3095. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3096. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                SEC. 3097. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3076. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3098. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3077. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3099. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3100. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3079. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3101. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 3078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

          SEC. 3102. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

      House Sec. 3078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3103. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

      Senate Sec. 3147. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

               SEC. 3104. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI

      House Sec. 3082. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

              SEC. 3105. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI

      House Sec. 3083. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3106. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI

      House Sec. 3084, Senate Sec. 3078.--Same.

               SEC. 3107. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI

      House Sec. 3085. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3108. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI

      House Sec. 3086. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 3109. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA

      Senate Sec. 3080. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

 SEC. 3110. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND NORTH DAKOTA

      Senate Sec. 3081. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

              SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA

      House Sec. 3087. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 3112. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA

      House Sec. 3088. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA

      House Sec. 3089, Senate Sec. 3082.--Same.

         SEC. 3114. LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, MCCARRAN RANCH, NEVADA

      Senate Sec. 3083. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

     SEC. 3115. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 3090. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

      SEC. 3116. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 3091. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 3117. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO

      Senate Sec. 3084. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

          SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO

      Senate Sec. 3085. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 3119. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.

      House Sec. 3092. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     SEC. 3120. LONG ISLAND SOUND OYSTER RESTORATION, NEW YORK AND 
                              CONNECTICUT

      Senate Sec. 3086. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      The Managers recognize that oyster restoration activities 
are consistent with the Corps environmental protection and 
restoration mission, and are appropriately cost shared at a 
non-Federal cost of 35 percent, consistent with section 103 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213). 
This section does not create a new cost share for oyster 
restoration activities.

 SEC. 3121. MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVERS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, NEW 
                                  YORK

      Senate Sec. 3087. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

               SEC. 3122. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 3093, Senate Sec. 3088.--Senate recedes.

  SEC. 3123. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 3094. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3124. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM

      House Sec. 3095, Senate Sec. 3090.--Same.

    SEC. 3125. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED 
                          MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK

      Senate Sec. 3091. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

          SEC. 3126. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, NORTH DAKOTA

      Senate Sec. 3092. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3127. WAHPETON, NORTH DAKOTA

      No comparable Senate or House section.

                            SEC. 3128. OHIO

      Senate Sec. 3093. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

             SEC. 3129. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, GIRARD, OHIO

      House Sec. 3096, Senate Sec. 3094.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                    SEC. 3130. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO

      House Sec. 3074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3131. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 3096. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

              SEC. 3132. ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 3012. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                   SEC. 3133. LAKE EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 3097. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

       SEC. 3134. OKLAHOMA LAKES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 3099. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3135. OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 3100. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.
      Section 3135 provides general authorization to complete 
the current buyout of residences and businesses in the 
communities of Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma for 
those applicants that wish to participate in the program being 
administered by the State of Oklahoma. The funds authorized in 
this section may be appropriated through any Act of 
appropriation.
      Section 3135 directs the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency to consider a remedial action 
for the Tar Creek, Oklahoma, National Priorities List site that 
includes permanent relocation of residents consistent with the 
program and costs of the program being administered by the 
State of Oklahoma. The Administrator should make appropriate 
use of the expertise and experience of the State of Oklahoma 
Lead-Impacted Communities Relocation Assistance Trust in 
developing such a remedy.
      Section 3135 also provides that the inclusion of 
subsidence remedies, such as relocation, as part of the 
remedial action does not preempt or in any way delay or 
interfere with the right of any sovereign entity, including any 
state or tribal government, to utilize state laws to seek 
additional or other remedies, such as abatement, for the land 
subsidence and subsidence risks. This section does not 
supersede state or tribal authority to seek remedies for land 
subsidence.

       SEC. 3136. RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS

      Senate Sec. 3101. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 3137. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 3102. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

  SEC. 3138. UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 
                                 OREGON

      Senate Sec. 3104. House Sec. 5103.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

   SEC. 3139. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND DELAWARE

      House Sec. 3098. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3140. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 3099. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

SEC. 3141. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 
                              PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 3100. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 3142. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 3101. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3143. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 3102. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 3144. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 3103. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 3145. NARRAGANSETT BAY, RHODE ISLAND

      Senate Sec. 3106. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

          SEC. 3146. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA

      Senate Sec. 3108. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                     SEC. 3147. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3104, Senate Sec. 3113.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                   SEC. 3148. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3105, Senate Sec. 3116.--House recedes.

                      SEC. 3149. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3106. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 3150. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3107. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 3151. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3108. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 3152. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3109. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      The managers recognize the need to review Federal policy 
concerning water supply at Corps of Engineers reservoirs, and 
to determine whether changes are warranted. At many existing 
Corps of Engineers reservoirs, there is the possibility of 
expanding the storage space that is dedicated to municipal and 
industrial water supply (drinking water) as an alternative to 
alleviate local water supply shortages. This is particularly 
true throughout the Southwest and Southeast. The current policy 
of the Corps of Engineers is to maximize the return to the 
Treasury for the right to utilize storage at these existing 
reservoirs. This often makes the cost of storage too high for 
many communities.
      The managers have included section 3152 in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007 to address this issue at Pat 
Mayse Lake, Texas; however, the managers do not expect to 
address additional water supply agreements on a case-by-case 
basis in future water resources bills, but rather to review the 
overall Federal policy concerning the operation of Corps of 
Engineers facilities.

                     SEC. 3153. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3110. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3154. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

      House Sec. 3111. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3155. CONNECTICUT RIVER RESTORATION, VERMONT

      Senate Sec. 3118. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                  SEC. 3156. DAM REMEDIATION, VERMONT

      Senate Sec. 3118. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      This provision adds the following dams to section 543 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000; Camp Wapanacki, 
Hardwick; Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly; Curtis Pond, Calais; 
Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield; Burr Pond, Sudbury; 
Maidstone Lake, Guildhall; Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam; Lake 
Fairlee; West Charleston Dam; White River, Sharon.

 SEC. 3157. LAKE CHAMPLAIN EURASIAN MILFOIL, WATER CHESTNUT, AND OTHER 
                    NONNATIVE PLANT CONTROL, VERMONT

      Senate Sec. 3120. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

 SEC. 3158. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION, VERMONT 
                           AND NEW HAMPSHIRE

      Senate Sec. 3121. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

SEC. 3159. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, VERMONT 
                           AND NEW HAMPSHIRE

      Senate Sec. 3122. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

       SEC. 3160. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED, VERMONT AND NEW YORK

      Senate Sec. 3123. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         SEC. 3161. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA

      Senate Sec. 3148. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

              SEC. 3162. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 3112, Senate Sec. 3126.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                 SEC. 3163. DUWANISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 3113. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

   SEC. 3164. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, MCNARY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
                          WASHINGTON AND IDAHO

      Senate Sec. 3128. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

          SEC. 3165. SNAKE RIVER PROJECT, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO

      Senate Sec. 3130. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         SEC. 3166. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 3114. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       SEC. 3167. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 3115. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 3168. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 3116. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3169. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 3117. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3170. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA

      Senate Sec. 3132. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

               SEC. 3171. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

      Senate Sec. 3133. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3172. PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 3118. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

           SEC. 3173. GREEN BAY HARBOR, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN

      Senate Sec. 3134. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 SEC. 3174. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN

      House Sec. 3119. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 3175. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS

      House Sec. 3120, Senate Sec. 3137.--Senate recedes.

              SEC. 3176. UPPER BASIN OF THE MISSOURI RIVER

      Senate Sec. 3140. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

  SEC. 3177. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
                                PROGRAM

      Senate Sec. 3139. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

   SEC. 3178. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM NEW 
                        TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM

      Senate Sec. 3144. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

           SEC. 3179. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

      (1) Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California. House 
Sec. 3121(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      (2) Agana River, Guam. House Sec. 3121(2). No comparable 
Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      (3) Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland and Virginia. 
House Sec. 3121(3), Senate Sec. 3067.--Senate recedes.
      (4) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts. House Sec. 3121(4), 
Senate Sec. 3071.--Senate recedes.
      (5) Ecorse Creek, Wayne County, Michigan. Senate 
Sec. 3073, No comparable House section.--House recedes.

                  SEC. 3180. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS

      (1) Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and Wisconsin. 
House Sec. 3122(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      (2) Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, Minnesota. 
House Sec. 3122(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      (3) Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin. House Sec. 3122(2), 
Senate Sec. 3135.--Senate recedes.

                  SEC. 3181. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS

      (a)(1) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut. House 
Sec. 3123(a)(1), Senate Sec. 6003.--Senate recedes.
      (a)(2) Mystic River, Connecticut. House Sec. 3123(a)(2). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      (a)(3) Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut. Senate Sec. 3031. No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      (a)(4) Rockland Harbor, Maine. House Sec. 3123(a)(4), 
Senate Sec. 3036.--House recedes.
      (a)(5) Rockport Harbor, Maine. Senate Sec. 3064. No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      (a)(6) Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts. House 
Sec. 3123(a)(5), Senate Sec. 6027.--Senate recedes.
      (a)(7) Island End River, Massachusetts. House 
Sec. 3123(a)(5), Senate Sec. 6028.--Senate recedes.
       (a)(8) City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington. House 
Sec. 3123(a)(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (a)(9) Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts. House 
Sec. 3123(a)(8), Senate Sec. 3070.--Senate recedes.
       (a)(10) Whatcom Creek Waterway, Bellingham, Washington. 
Senate Sec. 3131. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (a)(11) Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin. Senate Sec. 3136. No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut. 
Senate Sec. 3031, House Sec. 3142(a)(3).--House recedes.
      (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut. House 
Sec. 3123(b). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      (d) Saco River, Maine. House Sec. 3123(c), Senate 
Sec. 3065.--Same.
      (e) Union River, Maine. House Sec. 3123(d), Senate 
Sec. 3066.--Senate recedes.
      (f) Mystic River, Massachusetts. House Sec. 3123(e), 
Senate Sec. 6029.--Senate recedes.
      (g) Rivercenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      (h) Additional Deauthorizations. Senate Sec. Sec. 6002, 
6004, 6005, 6007, 6008, 6009, 6011, 6013, 6014, 6015, 6016, 
6017, 6018, 6019, 6022, 6023, 6026, 6033, 6034, 6036, 6037, 
6042, 6045, 6046, 6048, 6049, 6050, 6051, 6052, 6053, and 6055. 
No comparable House sections.--House recedes.

                      SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES

      (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri. House 
Sec. 3124(a), Senate Sec. 3011.--Senate recedes.
      (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, California. Senate 
Sec. 5006. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      (c) Milford, Kansas. House Sec. 3124(b), Senate 
Sec. 3052.--Senate recedes.
      (d) Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas. Senate 
Sec. 3051. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      (e) Pike County, Missouri. House Sec. 3124(c), Senate 
Sec. 3077.--House recedes.
      (f) Union Lake, Missouri. Senate Sec. 3079, No comparable 
House section.--House recedes.
      (g) Boardman, Oregon. House Sec. 3124(d). No comparable 
Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      (h) Lookout Point Project, Lowell, Oregon. House 
Sec. 3124(e), Senate Sec. 3103.--Senate recedes, with an 
amendment.
      (i) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina. House 
Sec. 3124(g), Senate Sec. 3107.--House recedes, with an 
amendment.
      (j) Denison, Texas. House Sec. 3124(h), Senate 
Sec. 3114.--House recedes, with an amendment.
      (k) Generally Applicable Provisions. House Sec. 3124(i). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

      SEC. 3183. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
                              RESTRICTIONS

      (a) Idaho. House Sec. 3125(a), Senate Sec. 3044.--House 
recedes.
      (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma. House Sec. 3125(b), Senate 
Sec. 3098.--House recedes, with an amendment.
      (c) Lowell, Oregon. House Sec. 3124(f). No comparable 
Senate provision.--Senate recedes.
      (d) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, 
Tennessee. House Sec. 3125(c), Senate Sec. 3111.--House 
recedes.
      (e) Lower Granite Pool, Washington. Senate Sec. 3128. No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      (f) Port of Pasco, Washington. House Sec. 3125(d). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

            SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM

      House Sec. 4001. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES

      House Sec. 4002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY

      House Sec. 4003. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER

      House Sec. 4004. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 4005. EURASIAN MILFOIL

      Senate Sec. 4031. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                     SEC. 4006. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5031. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                SEC. 4007. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA

      House Sec. 4005. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4008. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA

      House Sec. 4006. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              SEC. 4009. NOME HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS, ALASKA

      Senate Sec. 4002. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                  SEC. 4010. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA

      House Sec. 4007. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 4011. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA

      House Sec. 4008. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       SEC. 4012. VALDEZ, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5037. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                SEC. 4013. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA

      House Sec. 4009. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4014. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS

      House Sec. 4010. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4015. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4011. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 4016. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4013. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    SEC. 4017. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 4004. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

     SEC. 4018. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4014, Senate Sec. 4005.--Senate recedes.

               SEC. 4019. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4015. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       SEC. 4020. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4016. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 4021. ORICK, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4018. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 4022. SHORELINE STUDY, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 4007. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

           SEC. 4023. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4019. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 4024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4020. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 4025. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4021. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 4026. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4022, Senate Sec. 4009.--Senate recedes.

        SEC. 4027. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4023, Senate Sec. 4010.--House recedes.

                SEC. 4028. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4024. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 4029. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 4025. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 4030. SELENIUM STUDY, COLORADO

      Senate Sec. 4013. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

     SEC. 4031. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
                          WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

      House Sec. 4027. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 4032. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC COAST, 
                                DELAWARE

      Senate Sec. 4014. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

               SEC. 4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 4028. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 4034. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 4029. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

   SEC. 4035. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION 
                            REPORT, FLORIDA

      Senate Sec. 4015. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

              SEC. 4036. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 4030. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 4037. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA

      House Sec. 4031. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     SEC. 4038. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO

      House Sec. 4033, Senate Sec. 4016.--Senate recedes.

           SEC. 4039. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 4034. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 4040. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

      Senate Sec. 3046. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                       SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA

      House Sec. 4035. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 4036. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 4037. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 4038. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4045. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 4018. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

      SEC. 4046. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND

      Senate Sec. 3071(b). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4047. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 4039. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 4048. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 4040. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              SEC. 4049. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN

      Senate Sec. 4019. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

       SEC. 4050. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN

      House Sec. 4041. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 4051. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI

      House Sec. 4042. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 4052. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 4044. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     SEC. 4053. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 4045. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 4054. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 4046. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 4055. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 4047. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4056. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 4048. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                      SEC. 4057. BATAVIA, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4049. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              SEC. 4058. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4050. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4059. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4051. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4052. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4061. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4053. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4062. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4054. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 4063. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4055. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 4064. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 4056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 4065. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 4057. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 4066. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 4058. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 4067. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 4059. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 4068. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO

      Senate Sec. 4022. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                       SEC. 4069. LAKE ERIE, OHIO

      House Sec. 4060. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 4070. OHIO RIVER, OHIO

      House Sec. 4061, Senate Sec. 4024.--Same.

   SEC. 4071. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, OHIO

      Senate Sec. 4025. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

   SEC. 4072. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL PROJECT, 
                              TOLEDO, OHIO

      Senate Sec. 4026. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

 SEC. 4073. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON

      House Sec. 4062. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 4074. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON

      House Sec. 4063, Senate Sec. 4038.--Senate recedes.

           SEC. 4075. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 4064. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

      SEC. 4076. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 4065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 4077. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION

      House Sec. 4066. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 4078. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 4067. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 4079. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 4068. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 4080. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO

      House Sec. 4069. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

SEC. 4081. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, 
                              RHODE ISLAND

      Senate Sec. 4027. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

        SEC. 4082. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 4070. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 4083. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 4071. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 4084. SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA

      Senate Sec. 4028. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 4085. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 4072. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 4086. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 4073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 4087. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 4074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       SEC. 4088. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 4075. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     SEC. 4089. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 4076. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       SEC. 4090. ABILENE, TEXAS

      House Sec. 4077. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 4091. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TEXAS

      House Sec. 4078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 4092. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS

      House Sec. 4079. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 4093. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH

      House Sec. 4080. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 4094. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH

      House Sec. 4081. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

      SEC. 4095. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT

      Senate Sec. 4030. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

          SEC. 4096. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 4083, Senate Sec. 4034.--Senate recedes.

       SEC. 4097. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 4084. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 4098. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN

      House Sec. 4085. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 4099. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN

      House Sec. 4087, Senate Sec. 4035.--Same.

                    SEC. 4100. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN

      House Sec. 4086. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       SEC. 4101. DEBRIS REMOVAL

      Senate Sec. 4036. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

             SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS

      5001(a)(1). Manatee Harbor Basin, Florida. House 
Sec. 5001(a)(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      5001(a)(2). Tampa Harbor, Sparkman Channel and Davis 
Island, Florida. No comparable Senate or House section.
      5001(a)(3). West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, 
Florida. House Sec. 5001(a)(2). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      5001(a)(4). Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, 
Louisiana. House Sec. 5001(a)(3). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      5001(a)(5). Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana. 
House Sec. 5001(a)(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      5001(a)(6). Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial 
Park, Memphis Harbor, Tennessee. House Sec. 5001(a)(5). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      5001(a)(7). Houston Ship Channel, Bayport Cruise Channel 
and Bayport Cruise turning basin, as part of the existing 
Bayport Channel, Texas. No comparable Senate or House section.
      5001(a)(8). Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers 
County, Texas. House Sec. 5001(a)(6). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      5001(a)(9). Jacintoport Channel at Houston Ship Channel, 
Texas. No comparable Senate or House section.
      5001(a)(10). Racine Harbor, Wisconsin. House 
Sec. 5001(a)(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

                    SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

      House Sec. 5002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      Subsection (d) of Sec. 5002 authorizes the Secretary to 
provide technical assistance to non-federal interests for 
carrying out watershed management, restoration and development 
projects in the following locations: Charlotte Harbor 
watershed, Florida; Those portions of the watersheds of the 
Chattahoochee, Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Rivers lying 
within the counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, 
DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, 
Henry, Paulding, Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia; Kinkaid Lake, 
Jackson County, Illinois; Amite River basin, Louisiana; East 
Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish and Pointe Coupee 
Parish, Louisiana; Red River watershed, Louisiana; Taunton 
River basin, Massachusetts; Marlboro Township, New Jersey; 
Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, Sullivan, and 
Ulster Counties, New York; Greenwood Lake watershed, New York 
and New Jersey; Long Island Sound watershed, New York; Ramapo 
River watershed, New York; Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio; 
Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio; Those portions of the watersheds 
of the Beaver, Upper Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, 
Kiskiminetas, Lower Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and 
Mahoning Rivers lying within the counties of Beaver, Butler, 
Lawrence, and Mercer, Pennsylvania; Otter Creek watershed, 
Pennsylvania; Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, 
Pennsylvania; and Sauk River basin, Washington.

                         SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY

      House Sec. 5003. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      Section 5003(a) authorizes the Secretary to provide 
assistance to enhance dam safety at the following locations: 
Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois; Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, 
Fulton County, Indiana; Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho; 
Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan; Congers Lake Dam, 
Rockland County, New York; Lake Lucille Dam, New City, New 
York; Peconic River Dams, town of Riverhead, Suffolk, Long 
Island, New York; Pine Grove Lakes Dam, Sloatsburg, New York; 
State Dam, Auburn, New York; Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New 
York; Brightwood Dam, Concord Township, Ohio; Ingham Spring 
Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania; Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh 
County, Pennsylvania; Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, 
Pennsylvania; Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, 
Pennsylvania.

              SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS

      House Sec. 5004. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

               SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS

      House Sec. 5005. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      Section 5005(a)(3) adds the following locations to 
Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(33 U.S.C. 2332(e)): Ascension Parish, Louisiana; East Baton 
Rouge Parish, Louisiana; Iberville Parish, Louisiana; 
Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and Pointe Coupee Parish, 
Louisiana.

        SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS

      House Sec. 5006, Senate Sec. 3008.--Senate recedes.
      The managers recognize that in carrying out the project 
for the Colonias along the United States-Mexico border, the 
Secretary may provide assistance to projects in Webb, Zapata, 
Starr, and Hidalgo counties, Texas.

SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
                                PROJECTS

      House Sec. 5007, 5038, and 7010(2). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.
      Section 5007 directs the Secretary to expedite completion 
of the reports, and if the Secretary finds that the project is 
feasible, to expedite completion of construction of following 
projects: Project for navigation, Whittier, Alaska; Laguna 
Creek watershed flood damage reduction project, California; 
Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida; Flagler Beach 
shore protection project, Florida; St. Johns County shore 
protection project, Florida; Chenier Plain environmental 
restoration project, Louisiana; False River, Louisiana; Fulmer 
Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York; Moyer Creek, Village of 
Frankfort, New York; Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York; 
Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York; Whitney 
Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New York; North 
River, Peabody, Massachusetts; and Chenango Lake, Chenango 
County, New York.
      The managers request that a timetable for the execution 
and completion of a feasibility cost-sharing agreement and 
initiation of construction of the Laguna Creek watershed flood 
damage reduction project, Fremont, California, be provided to 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives within 90 days of the enactment of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007.

    SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS

      House Sec. 5008(a), Senate Sec. 4012.--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.
      Section 5008(a) directs the Secretary to expedite 
completion of the following reports, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is justified, authorizes the 
Secretary to proceed to project preconstruction, engineering 
and design: Project for water supply, Little Red River, 
Arkansas; Watershed study, Fountain Creek, north of Pueblo, 
Colorado; Project for shoreline stabilization, Egmont Key, 
Florida; Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas 
and Louisiana; and Project for ecosystem restoration, 
University Lake, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
      In carrying out the review of the project for navigation, 
Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas and Louisiana, referred to in 
subsection (a)(3), the Secretary is directed to utilize all 
current available data, models, and analyses to facilitate the 
scheduled completion of the Chief of Engineers report.
      House Sec. 5008(b). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

      House Sec. 5009. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 5010. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

      House Sec. 5011, Senate Sec. 3109.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

    SEC. 5011. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM

      House Sec. 5012, Senate Sec. 3141.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

 SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION

      House Sec. 5013, Senate Sec. 3142.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS

      House Sec. 5014, Senate Sec. 3143.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

            SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION AND PROTECTION

      House Sec. 5015 and 5016, Senate Sec. 5029.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The Great Lakes contain 134 deep-draft harbors and six 
connecting channels within the Corps of Engineers' dredging 
responsibility, including 25 of the nation's largest ports. The 
total waterborne commerce on the Great Lakes equals nearly 7 
percent of the nation's maritime commerce. Recent shortfalls in 
the Corps' dredging appropriation have delayed dredging at many 
Great Lakes ports and waterways. The low water levels that have 
plagued the Lakes since the late 1990s have only exacerbated 
the problem. As a result, the largest vessels in the Great 
Lakes fleet must forfeit nearly 270 tons of cargo for each 1-
inch reduction in loaded draft. Ocean-going vessels in the 
international trade lose roughly 100 tons of cargo for each 1-
inch loss of draft.
      Section 5014(a) directs the Secretary, using available 
appropriated funds, to expedite the operation and maintenance, 
including dredging, of the navigation features of the Great 
Lakes and Connecting Channels for the purpose of supporting 
commercial navigation to authorized project depths.

                    SEC. 5015. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY

      House Sec. 5017. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

      SEC. 5016. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT

      House Sec. 5018, Senate Sec. 4021.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                     SEC. 5017. ESTUARY RESTORATION

      Senate Sec. 5002. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

 SEC. 5018. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, RECOVERY, AND 
 RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, 
                       SOUTH DAKOTA, AND WYOMING

      Senate Sec. 5016. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

 SEC. 5019. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, 
                  MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 5019, Senate Sec. 5010.--House recedes.

  SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
                                PROGRAM

      House Sec. 5020, Senate Sec. 3068.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

  SEC. 5021. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND

      Senate Sec. 3124. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                     SEC. 5022. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT

      House Sec. 5021. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 5023. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY STRATEGY 
                   EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM

      House Sec. 5022. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5024. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY

      House Sec. 5023. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
                         RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL

      House Sec. 5025. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                        SEC. 5026. WAGE SURVEYS

      House Sec. 5135. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       SEC. 5027. REHABILITATION

      House Sec. 5024. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       SEC. 5028. AUBURN, ALABAMA

      House Sec. 5026. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 5029. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA

      House Sec. 5027. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                           SEC. 5030. ALASKA

      House Sec. 5028, Senate Sec. 5004.--Senate recedes.

                       SEC. 5031. BARROW, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5029. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 5032. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5034. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

       SEC. 5033. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5035, Senate Sec. 3001.--Same.

                    SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5036. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5035. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA

      House Sec. 5039. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 5036. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS

      House Sec. 5040, Senate Sec. 3007.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

             SEC. 5037. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS

      House Sec. 5041. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 5038. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS

      House Sec. 5042. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                         SEC. 5039. CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 5005. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

   SEC. 5040. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, 
                          STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 5007. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                     SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5044. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

   SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
                 MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5045. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 5043. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5046. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5047. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 5045. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5048. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

   SEC. 5046. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, 
                               CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 3016. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5049. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5048. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5050. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     SEC. 5049. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5051, Senate Sec. 3021.--House recedes.

  SEC. 5050. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN GABRIEL 
                           BASIN, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5052. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 5051. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5053. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         SEC. 5052. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA

      House Sec. 5054, Senate Sec. 3025.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

   SEC. 5053. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN MARSH 
                         ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

      House Sec. 5055, Senate Sec. 4011.--Senate recedes.

                   SEC. 5054. ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA

      Senate Sec. 4008. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

         SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA

      House Sec. 5056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
                           MEXICO, AND TEXAS

      Senate Sec. 5008, House Sec. 5002(d)(9).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

   SEC. 5057. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
                              CONNECTICUT

      House Sec. 5057, Senate Sec. 3030.--Senate recedes.

                    SEC. 5058. STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

  SEC. 5059. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND 
                                VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 5081, Senate Sec. 5009.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

     SEC. 5060. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND

      House Sec. 5080, Senate Sec. 5011.--Senate recedes.

             SEC. 5061. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA

      House Sec. 5060. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 5062. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS

      House Sec. 5058. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     SEC. 5063. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 5059. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 5064. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION 
                                PROGRAM

      Senate Sec. 5012. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

     SEC. 5065. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT

      Senate Sec. 5013. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                      SEC. 5066. SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

 SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND 
                                WYOMING

      Senate Sec. 5014. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

             SEC. 5068. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO

      House Sec. 5062. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 5069. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 5066. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

  SEC. 5070. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI FLOOD PROTECTION 
                                PROJECTS

      House Sec. 5063, Senate Sec. 3049.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

              SEC. 5071. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION

      House Sec. 5064, Senate Sec. 3048.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

  SEC. 5072. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO SHORELINE, 
                           CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 5067, Senate Sec. 4017.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

        SEC. 5073. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION

      House Sec. 5065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                     SEC. 5074. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 5068. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5075. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA

      House Sec. 5070. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 5076. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA

      House Sec. 5071. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                      SEC. 5077. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 5072. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 5078. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 5073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5079. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY

      House Sec. 5074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5080. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 5075. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              SEC. 5081. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 5076. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    SEC. 5082. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN REGION, 
                               LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 5077. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    SEC. 5083. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT, LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 5028. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                SEC. 5084. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA

      No comparable Senate or House section.

            SEC. 5085. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 5017. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

             SEC. 5086. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA

      House Sec. 5078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                    SEC. 5087. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND

      House Sec. 5079. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 5088. ST. MARY'S RIVER, MARYLAND

      No comparable House or Senate section.

        SEC. 5089. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES

      House Sec. 5082. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 5090. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN

      House Sec. 5083. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5091. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 5084. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 5092. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 5085. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 5093. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 5086. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5094. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 5087. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5095. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 5088. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 5096. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA

      House Sec. 5089, Senate Sec. 4020.--Senate recedes.

                         SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI

      Senate Sec. 5018. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

    SEC. 5098. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI

      House Sec. 5090. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 5099. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS

      House Sec. 5091. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     SEC. 5100. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

      House Sec. 5092. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

      SEC. 5101. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

                      SEC. 5102. MISSOULA, MONTANA

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

          SEC. 5103. ST. MARY PROJECT, GLACIER COUNTY, MONTANA

      Senate Sec. 5019. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.
      In carrying out this section, the managers expect the 
Secretary to conduct all hiring and contracting in accordance 
with the requirements set forth in the Indian Self 
Determination Act.

     SEC. 5104. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEBRASKA

      Senate Sec. 5020, House Sec. 5002(d)(8).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

           SEC. 5105. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY

      House Sec. 5093. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 5106. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK

      House Sec. 5094. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           SEC. 5107. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 5095. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       SEC. 5108. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 5096. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5109. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 5097. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

                 SEC. 5110. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK

      House Sec. 5098. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     SEC. 5111. NORTH HEMPSTED AND GLEN COVE NORTH SHORE WATERSHED 
                         RESTORATION, NEW YORK

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

                     SEC. 5112. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

                       SEC. 5113. NORTH CAROLINA

      Senate Sec. 5021. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                SEC. 5114. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 5100. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       SEC. 5115. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA

      House Sec. 5099. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      SEC. 5116. CINCINNATI, OHIO

      House Sec. 5101. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

          SEC. 5117. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

      Senate Sec. 5022. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

 SEC. 5118. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO

      House Sec. 5102, Senate Sec. 3095.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

      SEC. 5119. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA

      Senate Sec. 5023. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5120. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON

      House Sec. 5104. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 5121. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 5105. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 5122. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 5106. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 5123. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 5107. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

          SEC. 5124. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 5108. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5125. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA

      House Sec. 5109. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  SEC. 5126. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK

      House Sec. 5110, Senate Sec. 3105.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

           SEC. 5127. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

      House Sec. 5111. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

          SEC. 5128. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA

      No comparable House or Senate section.

  SEC. 5129. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
         TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA

      House Sec. 5112, Senate Sec. 5024.--Same.

                       SEC. 5130. EAST TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 5113. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 5131. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 5114. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 5132. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 5115. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5133. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

      No comparable Senate or House section.
      The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
riverfront development projects to local communities and that, 
in some instances, waterfront and riverfront development plans 
contain elements that fall within traditional Corps mission 
areas of navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental 
restoration, and associated recreation. However, the managers 
believe that waterfront and riverfront development projects, in 
and of themselves, are not a Corps mission and Corps 
participation in these development projects must be limited to 
traditional Corps missions. While recreation is frequently an 
element of waterfront and riverfront development projects, the 
managers do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely 
recreational elements of the project, unrelated to the 
traditional missions of the Corps. The managers direct the 
Corps to limit its work on recreation features to only those 
elements that relate to the traditional Corps mission areas 
that are being built as an element of the larger waterfront and 
riverfront development project plan.

             SEC. 5134. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

      Senate Sec. 3110. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 SEC. 5135. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP

      House Sec. 5117. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             SEC. 5136. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE

      House Sec. 5116. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

   SEC. 5137. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, AND 
                              MISSISSIPPI

      House Sec. 5118. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                            SEC. 5138. TEXAS

      Senate Sec. 5025. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                SEC. 5139. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS

      House Sec. 5119. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 SEC. 5140. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS

      House Sec. 5120. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 5141. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS

      House Sec. 5121. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5142. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

      House Sec. 5122, Senate Sec. 3117.--House recedes.

               SEC. 5143. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS

      House Sec. 5123, Senate Sec. 4029.--Senate recedes.

                     SEC. 5144. ONION CREEK, TEXAS

      House Sec. 5124. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               SEC. 5145. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT

      Senate Sec. 5026. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         SEC. 5146. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL, VERMONT AND NEW YORK

      Senate Sec. 4032. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

            SEC. 5147. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 5126. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

            SEC. 5148. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 5125. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5149. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA

      Senate Sec. 3125. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

           SEC. 5150. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 5127, Senate Sec. 4033.--Senate recedes.

           SEC. 5151. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 5128. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 5152. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 5129, Senate Sec. 3127.--House recedes.

                   SEC. 5153. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON

      House Sec. 5130. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        SEC. 5154. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL

      House Sec. 5131. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    SEC. 5155. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 5132. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   SEC. 5156. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA

      House Sec. 5133. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

   SEC. 5157. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                               INTERESTS

      House Sec. 5134, Senate Sec. 2011.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.
      (12) Perris, California
      (13) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.
      (14) Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
      (15) Buffalo Bayou, Texas.
      (16) Halls Bayou, Texas.
      (17) Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin.

         SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS

      House Sec. 5136, Senate Sec. 5003.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

          SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA

      House Sec. 6001, Senate Sec. 3037.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                       SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS

      House Sec. 6002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                        SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS

      House Sec. 6004, Senate Sec. 3034.--Senate recedes, with 
an amendment.

                           SEC. 6004. CREDIT

      House Sec. 6006. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      The managers are concerned about the practice of the non-
Federal sponsor performing work on the project without a 
written agreement with the Corps, and then relying upon 
legislation to receive credit against the non-Federal share. 
Consistent with section 2003 of this bill, for future work to 
be considered eligible for credit, it must be performed under a 
written agreement with the Secretary.

                   SEC. 6005. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE

      House Sec. 6007. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                SEC. 6006. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS

      House Sec. 6008, Senate Sec. 3036.--House recedes, with 
an amendment.

  SEC. 6007. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION

      House Sec. 6011. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  INITIAL PROJECTS, COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN, FLORIDA

      The managers have agreed to delete House section 6003 
that would have increased the maximum cost for three initial 
projects of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan 
(CERP)--Water Conservation Areas 3A/3B Levee Seepage 
Management, C-11 Impoundment and Stormwater Treatment Area, and 
C-9 Impoundment and Stormwater Treatment Area. These projects 
are still undergoing study and final cost estimates are not 
available. Project components of CERP have seen their cost 
estimates vary widely during the project formulation and design 
phases. The managers support the completion of the studies on 
these projects prior to taking action on their cost estimates. 
Until the final project implementation report recommends final 
cost estimates, the managers believe that it is premature to 
enact new cost figures.
      The project implementation reports for the three projects 
are projected to be completed in 2008. The managers expect to 
consider the correct authorization levels for these projects in 
a water resources bill next year.

               MODIFIED WATER DELIVERIES PROJECT, FLORIDA

      The Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act 
of 1989, Public Law 101-229, (1989 Act), authorized the 
expansion of Everglades National Park (Park), a change to more 
natural water deliveries to the Park, and flood damage 
reduction measures for the area known as the eight and one-half 
square mile area. Of the three activities, there still has been 
no change in water deliveries to the Park. Without a change in 
water delivery to the Park, restoration of the Everglades, and 
many of the projects authorized as components of the 
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) in 2000, will 
not succeed.
      To achieve more natural water deliveries to the Park, it 
is necessary to modify the way water crosses under the Tamiami 
Trail Highway. The managers of the bill are concerned that 
nearly 18 years have passed since the 1989 Act, and the 
restoration of more natural water flows has not occurred. While 
the House bill contained language directing a particular option 
toward restoring flows, the Corps of Engineers and other 
interested parties have indicated that the ``two-bridge'' 
option may not be the preferred solution. However, the managers 
are concerned that continuing re-analysis of options for 
modifying water deliveries will only delay benefits to the 
Everglades.
      The managers have observed proposals related to improved 
water deliveries to the Park come and go over the years, yet 
the more natural flows to the Park do not occur. It is time for 
the Chief of Engineers to implement measures to improve water 
deliveries and adopt an adaptive management approach toward 
restoring flows.
      The managers have agreed to delete the House language on 
the two-bridge option. The managers direct the Chief of 
Engineers to re-examine options to modify the water delivery to 
the Park. However, the managers also direct the Chief of 
Engineer to pursue immediate steps to increase flows to the 
Park of at least 1400 cubic feet per second, without 
significantly increasing the risk of roadbed failure. Flows 
less than 1400 cubic feet per second will not produce 
measurable benefits to the Park.
      The managers direct the Chief of Engineers to proceed 
with increasing flows to the Park upon the completion of the 
eight and one-half square mile area construction this fall. 
Completing that construction removes the current constraint on 
water levels within the Northeast Shark River Slough area of 
the Park.
      The managers direct the Chief of Engineers to re-examine 
the prior reports and environmental documentation associated 
with modifying water deliveries to the Park prepared under the 
1989 Act, and to evaluate the practicable alternatives for 
increasing the flow of water under the highway and into the 
Park. The recommendations resulting from this re-examination 
are to be for improving flows in a manner that is consistent 
with the direction in the 1989 Act that the Secretary of the 
Army construct modifications ``to improve water deliveries into 
the park and shall, to the extent practicable, take steps to 
restore the natural hydrological conditions within the Park.'' 
The managers direct that the flows to the Park have a minimum 
target of 4000 cubic feet per second so as to address the 
restoration envisioned in the 1989 Act.
      The Chief of Engineers is to develop the recommendations 
in consultation with the Department of the Interior, the 
Department of Transportation, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians 
of Florida, the Seminole Tribe of Florida, and the State of 
Florida, and shall consider environmental benefits produced, 
cost, related CERP improvements, and other relevant factors.
      The recommendations of the Chief of Engineers shall 
identify a plan for increasing and distributing water flows to 
the Park through project components that take into account the 
fact that a subsequent project involving modifications to the 
Tamiami Trail Highway may be accomplished under the authority 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. Modifications 
that are not compatible with that project or are duplicative 
should be avoided.
      The recommendations of the Chief of Engineers shall be 
available for public review and comment consistent with 
applicable law, and shall be submitted to Congress not later 
than July 1, 2008.
      Concurrent with the preparation of recommendations for 
modifying water deliveries under the 1989 Act, the managers 
direct the Chief of Engineers to initiate an evaluation of the 
Tamiami Trail project component of the Comprehensive Everglades 
Restoration Plan authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(viii) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000, or other 
appropriate authorities, as soon as practicable. The 
recommendations shall include an evaluation of modifying 
Tamiami Trail from Krome Avenue to the boundary of the Big 
Cypress National Park to restore natural flows and ecological 
connectivity through the Park to Florida Bay. Upon completion 
of these recommendations the Chief of Engineers shall submit 
the recommendations to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
      The House language in section 6009 also addressed cost 
allocations between the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
Interior. The managers direct that any arrangements for sharing 
of costs between the Secretaries be prospective only. The 
mangers do not support any arrangement where the Secretary of 
the Interior is credited with expenditures for land acquisition 
toward the costs of modifying the water delivery to the Park. 
These costs represent separate responsibilities within the 
missions of the Department of the Army and the Department of 
the Interior, and the costs of one should not be used to offset 
the costs of the other.

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

                         SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS

      House Sec. 7001. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes, with an amendment.

                     SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

      House Sec. 7002, Senate Sec. 1003(h).--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.

                   SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

      House Sec. 7003, Senate Sec. 1003(a) and (b).--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION TASK 
                                 FORCE

      House Sec. 7004, Senate Sec. 1003(i).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

                    SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS

      House Sec. 7005, Senate Sec. 1003(m).--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.

                        SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION

      House Sec. 7006, Senate Sec. 1003(c), (d), (e), (f) and 
(j).--House recedes, with an amendment.
      For the benefit of the Louisiana coastal area, the 
managers have authorized a number of projects and programs. In 
the case of the Additional Projects authorized in section 
7006(e), the managers have authorized 4 projects for 
construction and have authorized 6 other projects contingent 
upon a Chief's Report being completed no later than December 
31, 2010. The managers understand that the 4 projects 
authorized for construction are closer to having a completed 
study than are the other 6 projects. The managers expect the 
Secretary to plan and construct all of these projects on a 
priority and a schedule that maximizes the efficient and timely 
delivery of benefits.

                   SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE

      House Sec. 7007, Senate Sec. 1003(g).--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.

                    SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

      House Sec. 7008, Senate Sec. 1003(k).--Senate recedes.

                     SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW

      House Sec. 7009, Senate Sec. 1003(n).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

                      SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS

      House Sec. 7010, Senate Sec. 1003(t).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

                          SEC. 7011. REPORTING

      House Sec. 7011. No comparable Senate provision.--Senate 
recedes.

                  SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY

      House Sec. 7012, Senate Sec. 1003(p).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

                SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET

      House Sec. 7013, Senate Sec. 1003(s).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

            SEC. 7014. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION

      Senate Sec. 1003(u). No comparable House provision.--
House recedes, with an amendment.

                   SEC. 7015. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW

      Senate Sec. 1003(q). No comparable House provision.--
House recedes, with an amendment.

              SEC. 7016. LOWER JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

      Senate Sec. 1003(r). No comparable House provision.--
House recedes, with an amendment.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM

                         SEC. 8001. DEFINITIONS

      House Sec. 8001, Senate Sec. 1002(a).--Same.

          SEC. 8002. NAVIGATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS AND RESTORATION

      House Sec. 8002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 SEC. 8003. AUTHORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

      House Sec. 8003, Senate Sec. 1002(b).--House recedes, 
with an amendment.

             SEC. 8004. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION

      House Sec. 8004, Senate Sec. 1002(c).--Senate recedes, 
with an amendment.

                     SEC. 8005. COMPARABLE PROGRESS

      House Sec. 8005, Senate Sec. 1002(d).--Senate recedes.

                TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

                         SEC. 9001. SHORT TITLE

      Senate Sec. 2051. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                         SEC. 9002. DEFINITIONS

      Senate Sec. 2052. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                  SEC. 9003. COMMITTEE ON LEVEE SAFETY

      Senate Sec. 2053 and 2054. No comparable House section.--
House recedes, with an amendment.

             SEC. 9004. INVENTORY AND INSPECTION OF LEVEES

      Senate Sec. 2054. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

            SEC. 9005. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION

      No comparable House or Senate section.

               SEC. 9006. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

      Senate Sec. 2055. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes, with an amendment.

                           ADDITIONAL MATTERS

      The managers request the Secretary make it a priority to 
reimburse non-federal project sponsors for carrying out federal 
projects in accordance with cooperative agreements. These 
projects provide benefits to the federal taxpayer and the Corps 
of Engineers should make every effort to reimburse non-federal 
project sponsors the appropriate amount in a timely manner. In 
one instance, Manatee County, Florida carried out the Anna 
Maria Island beach re-nourishment under a cooperative agreement 
with the Army Corps of Engineers for construction of the 
Manatee County Shore Protection Project in 2002. For Fiscal 
Year 2002, Congress appropriated $1 million for the project, 
and in Fiscal Year 2003, Congress appropriated $3.5 million for 
the project. Yet, Manatee County has received only $2.3 million 
in reimbursement from the Army Corps of Engineers and is still 
owed over $1.7 million for work that was completed in 2002. 
Many local communities and other non-federal project sponsors 
that undertake federal projects put their financial security at 
stake and timely reimbursement by the Corps of Engineers is 
critical to their economic prosperity.
      The Corps recently determined that the stability of Wolf 
Creek Dam is threatened by seepage under and around the dam, 
increasing the risk of catastrophic failure. The managers 
recognize that the Corps has cited an extreme concern for 
safety and lowered the level of Lake Cumberland dramatically to 
mitigate the risk of failure. The managers recognize that the 
Nashville District of the Corps has recommended that this 
project be classified as a dam safety project and therefore 
subject to reimbursement rates in accordance with the Dam 
Safety Act. Given the threat to safety as cited by the Corps 
and the recommendation by the Corps district office, the 
managers urge the administration to accept the recommendation 
of the Corps to classify this project as dam safety, and to 
finalize such a decision as soon as possible.
      The managers have increasingly heard concerns from 
Members of Congress regarding the backlog in the processing of 
permits under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In 
particular, the Jacksonville District of the Corps of Engineers 
processes \1/8\ of all the permits nationwide. The managers 
direct the Chief of Engineers to examine the permitting 
workload and consider alternatives for better distribution of 
the workload. The managers also direct the Chief of Engineers 
to work with States using current authorities to minimize the 
time required for the Corps to respond to permit applications.

                     COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XXI

      Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure is required to include a list of congressional 
earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits (as 
defined in clause 9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) of rule XXI of the Rules 
of the House of Representatives) in the Conference Report. The 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure requires Members 
of Congress to comply with all requirements of clause 9(d), 
9(e), or 9(f) of rule XXI. The following table provides the 
list of such provisions included in the Conference Report:


                From the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure, for consideration of the House 
                bill and the Senate amendment, and 
                modifications committed to conference:
                                   James L. Oberstar,
                                   Eddie Bernice Johnson,
                                   Ellen O. Tauscher,
                                   Brian Baird,
                                   Brian Higgins,
                                   Harry E. Mitchell,
                                   Steve Kagen,
                                   Jerry McNerney,
                                   John L. Mica,
                                   John J. Duncan, Jr.,
                                   Vernon J. Ehlers,
                                   R.H. Baker,
                                   Henry E. Brown, Jr.,
                                   John Boozman,
                From the Committee on Natural Resources, for 
                consideration of secs. 2014, 2023, and 6009 of 
                the House bill, and secs. 3023, 5008, and 5016 
                of the Senate amendment, and modifications 
                committed to conference:
                                   Nick Rahall,
                                   Grace F. Napolitano,
                                   Cathy McMorris Rodgers,
                                 Managers on the Part of the House.

                                   Barbara Boxer,
                                   Max Baucus,
                                   Joe Lieberman,
                                   Tom Carper,
                                   Hillary Rodham Clinton,
                                   Frank R. Lautenberg,
                                   James M. Inhofe,
                                   John Warner,
                                   George V. Voinovich,
                                   Johnny Isakson,
                                   David Vitter,
                                Managers on the Part of the Senate.

                                  
