[House Report 110-1]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
110th Congress Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
1st Session 110-1
======================================================================
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5, THE COLLEGE STUDENT RELIEF ACT
OF 2007
_______
January 16, 2007.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
printed
_______
Mrs. Matsui, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following
R E P O R T
[To accompany H. Res. 65]
The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration
House Resolution 65, by a record vote of 8 to 4, report the
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution
be adopted.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5, the
College Student Relief Act of 2007 under a closed rule. The
rule provides three hours of general debate equally divided and
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the
Committee on Education and Labor.
The rule waives all points of order against the bill and
against its consideration except for clause 9 and 10 of Rule
XXI. The rule provides one motion to recommit with or without
instructions. Finally, the rule provides that the Chair may
postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated
by the Speaker.
EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS
The waiver of all points of order against the consideration
of the bill (except for clause 9 and 10 of Rule XXI) includes a
waiver of section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act
(prohibiting the consideration of legislation providing new
budget authority for any fiscal year that would cause the
applicable allocation of new budget authority made pursuant to
section 302(a) or (b) to be exceeded). The bill violates
section 302(f) because its direct spending will exceed the
Committee on Education and Labor's allocation.
COMMITTEE VOTES
The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion
to report, together with the names of those voting for and
against, are printed below:
Rules Committee Record Vote No. 4
Date: January 16, 2007.
Measure: H.R. 5.
Motion by: Mr. Diaz-Balart.
Summary of motion: To report an open rule.
Results: Defeated 4-8.
Vote by Members: McGovern--Nay; Hastings (FL)--Nay;
Matsui--Nay; Cardoza--Nay; Welch--Nay; Castor--Nay; Sutton--
Nay; Dreier--Yea; Diaz-Balart--Yea; Hastings (WA)--Yea;
Sessions--Yea; Slaughter--Nay.
Rules Committee Record Vote No. 5
Date: January 16, 2007.
Measure: H.R. 5.
Motion by: Mr. Hastings (WA).
Summary of motion: To make in order and provide appropriate
waivers for an amendment by Rep. Bishop (UT) to return to state
and local education officials the power to determine what
constitutes a ``rigorous secondary school program of study''
when determining eligibility for the Academic Competitiveness
Pell Grant program. This power was given to the U.S. Secretary
of Education in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.
Results: Defeated 4-8.
Vote by Members: McGovern--Nay; Hastings (FL)--Nay;
Matsui--Nay; Cardoza--Nay; Welch--Nay; Castor--Nay; Sutton--
Nay; Dreier--Yea; Diaz-Balart--Yea; Hastings (WA)--Yea;
Sessions--Yea; Slaughter--Nay.
Rules Committee Record Vote No. 6
Date: January 16, 2007.
Measure: H.R. 5.
Motion by: Mr. Sessions.
Summary of motion: To make in order and provide appropriate
waivers for an amendment by Rep. Keller to add a Sense of
Congress to H.R. 5. The Sense of Congress states that the money
being saved in the bill should be used to increase grant aid
for students rather than provide interest rate cuts to college
graduates.
Results: Defeated 4-8.
Vote by Members: McGovern--Nay; Hastings (FL)--Nay;
Matsui--Nay; Cardoza--Nay; Welch--Nay; Castor--Nay; Sutton--
Nay; Dreier--Yea; Diaz-Balart--Yea; Hastings (WA)--Yea;
Sessions--Yea; Slaughter--Nay.
Rules Committee Record Vote No. 7
Date: January 16, 2007.
Measure: H.R. 5.
Motion by: Mr. Dreier.
Summary of motion: To make in order and provide appropriate
waivers for an amendment by Rep. McKeon to increase disclosure
to students and families about the cost of college. It would
also provide for increased accountability for institutions of
higher educations through establishing a userfriendly college
affordability comparison, creating quality efficiency task
forces, and authorizing the Secretary to waive burdensome
regulations so that institutions could experiment with cost
saving processes.
Results: Defeated 4-8.
Vote by Members: McGovern--Nay; Hastings (FL)--Nay;
Matsui--Nay; Cardoza--Nay; Welch--Nay; Castor--Nay; Sutton--
Nay; Dreier--Yea; Diaz-Balart--Yea; Hastings (WA)--Yea;
Sessions--Yea; Slaughter--Nay.
Rules Committee Record Vote No. 8
Date: January 16, 2007.
Measure: H.R. 5.
Motion by: Mr. McGovern.
Summary of motion: To report the rule.
Results: Adopted 8-4.
Vote by Members: McGovern--Yea; Hastings (FL)--Yea;
Matsui--Yea; Cardoza--Yea; Welch--Yea; Castor--Yea; Sutton--
Yea; Dreier--Nay; Diaz-Balart--Nay; Hastings (WA)--Nay;
Sessions--Nay; Slaughter--Yea.