[Senate Report 109-63]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 95
109th Congress Report
SENATE
1st Session 109-63
======================================================================
YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK SCHOOLS
_______
April 28, 2005.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mr. Domenici, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
[To accompany S. 136]
The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was
referred the bill (S. 136) to authorize the Secretary of the
Interior to provide supplemental funding and other services
that are necessary to assist certain local school districts in
the State of California in providing educational services for
students attending schools located within Yosemite National
Park, to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to adjust the
boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and for
other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably
thereon with amendments and recommends that the bill, as
amended, do pass.
The amendments are as follows:
1. Beginning on page 3, strike line 21 and all that follows
through page 4, line 8, and insert the following:
``(A) Any law authorizing the collection or
expenditure of entrance or use fees at units of
the National Park System, including--
``(i) the Land and Water Conservation
Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601-4 et
seq.); and
``(ii) the Federal Lands Recreation
Enhancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6801 et
seq.).
``(B) Any unexpended receipts collected
through--
``(i) the recreational fee
demonstration program established under
section 315 of the Department of the
Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1996 (16 U.S.C.
4601-6a note; Public Law 104-134); or
``(ii) the national park passport
program established under section 602
of the National Parks Omnibus
Management Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C.
5992).
``(C) Emergency appropriations for flood
recovery at Yosemite National Park.''
2. On page 6, line 11, delete ``(a)''.
Purpose of the Measure
The purposes of S. 136 are to authorize the Secretary of
the Interior to provide supplemental funding and other services
necessary to assist the State of California or local
educational agencies in California in providing educational
services for students attending schools located within or near
Yosemite National Park and to authorize the addition of
approximately 4,500 acres to the Golden Gate National
Recreation Area.
Background and Need
Title I--Yosemite Schools Funding: The Yosemite Valley, EI
Portal and Wawona schools are California public schools that
primarily serve the children of employees who live and work in
or near Yosemite National Park. Following historic floods in
January 1997, the number of families living within Yosemite
National Park declined sharply. Because the funding of schools
in the State of California is based on average daily
attendance, the reduced number of students attending the
schools resulted in a corresponding reduction in school
funding. This has left inadequate resources to pay for mandated
levels of educational services and virtually no funds for
construction, maintenance or other operations of the schools.
Although funding was included in the FY 2000 Education
Appropriations bill for the Mariposa County School District to
maintain services at two of the three schools, obtaining
special earmarks each year is an inefficient method to obtain
school funding.
The three schools, while in different locations, are in a
similar situation in that access to other area schools is
difficult. Yosemite Valley school is more than 1 hour from the
town of Mariposa via a narrow mountainous road. EI Portal
school is more than 40 minutes from Mariposa, and Wawona school
is 30 minutes from Oakhurst over a narrow mountain road. All
three schools are nearly 4,000 feet above sea level, and have
many snow days. The roads between Yosemite National Park and
the outlying communities are often closed due to weather or
rockslide. It is nearly impossible and clearly dangerous to
transport the students in these conditions.
Although National Park Service (NPS) funds are not
generally used for State educational purposes, there is one
precedent. Since 1948, Yellowstone National Park has operated a
park-based elementary school under statutory authority (16
U.S.C. 40a) that allows the NPS to provide supplemental funding
and facilities. Also, similar authority was provided at Grand
Canyon National Park for a short time in the 1970's.
S. 136 would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to
provide supplemental funding for 4 years to assist the State of
California or local school districts in providing educational
services for students attending the three schools.
Title II--Golden Gate National Recreation Area Addition:
The Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) encompasses
approximately 74,000 acres in several units in Marin, San
Francisco, and San Mateo counties in northern California. The
park's boundaries have been expanded several times since its
establishment in 1972 to provide for the inclusion of
additional lands. The most recent addition occurred in 2000,
when 1,500 acres were added to the park.
S. 136 would expand the GGNRA boundaries to include
approximately 4,762 acres in San Mateo County, known generally
as the ``Rancho Corral de Tierra'' property. Although
negotiations to acquire these properties were occurring at the
time of the 2000 additions, they were not completed in time for
inclusion in that legislation.
The lands to be added to the GGNRA by S. 136 include
Montara Mountain and other coastal ridges. Rising 2,000 feet
from the nearby coast, the mountain ridges contain the
headwaters and most of the watershed for four coastal stream
systems, and provide an important riparian habitat for
threatened species such as the California red-legged frog and
San Francisco garter snake. Montara Mountain is home to two
plant species that are found nowhere else in the world: the
Montara manzanita and blue lupine. The area also provides
important open space and scenic values, with views over the
entire San Francisco Bay area.
Legislative History
S. 136 was introduced by Senator Feinstein on January 24,
2005. During the 108th Congress, the Committee considered
similar legislation, S. 302 and H.R. 620.
S. 302, the GGNRA expansion bill, was introduced by
Senators Feinstein and Boxer on February 5, 2003. At its
business meeting on February 26, 2003, the Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources ordered S. 302 favorably reported with
amendment (S. Rept. 108-15). S. 302 passed the Senate with a
technical amendment by unanimous consent on April 3, 2003.
Similar legislation, S. 941, was introduced by Senators
Feinstein and Boxer during the 107th Congress. The Subcommittee
on National Parks held a hearing on S. 941 on July 26, 2001. At
its business meeting on August 2, 2001, the Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources ordered S. 941 favorably reported with
amendments (S. Rept. 107-70). S. 941 passed the Senate by
unanimous consent on October 17, 2001. The House of
Representatives passed the bill amended with several unrelated
measures on September 24, 2002. The Senate agreed to the House
amendment, with an additional amendment, on November 19, 2002.
H.R. 620, the Yosemite Schools bill, was introduced by
Congressman Radanovich on February 5, 2003 and passed the House
of Representatives by voice vote on March 25, 2003. The
Subcommittee on National Parks held a hearing on H.R. 620 on
September 9, 2003 (S. Hrg. 108-193). At the business meeting on
March 24, 2004, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
ordered H.R. 620 favorably reported (S. Rept. 108-255), with an
amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the
title. The amendment incorporated the text of S. 302 into H.R.
620, along with several unrelated measures, and passed the
Senate by unanimous consent on December 7, 2004. The House of
Representatives did not consider the bill prior to the sine die
adjournment of the 108th Congress.
A bill similar to the original version of H.R. 620, H.R.
3421, was introduced in the 107th Congress by Congressman
Radanovich and passed the House on April 30, 2002. At the
business meeting on October 8, 2004, the Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources ordered the bill, with amendments, to be
favorably reported, but the Senate failed to act prior to
adjournment.
At a business meeting on February 16, 2005, the Committee
on Energy and Natural Resources ordered S. 136 favorably
reported, with an amendment.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, in an open
business session on February 16, 2005, by a voice of a quorum
present, recommends that the Senate pass S. 136, if amended as
described herein.
Committee Amendment
During its consideration of S. 136, the Committee adopted
an amendment to clarify that funds collected in accordance with
the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (P.L. 108-447) and
the Recreation Fee Demonstration Program (Section 315 of P.L.
104-134) cannot be used to fund the schools. The Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act repealed the Recreation Fee
Demonstration Program, although funds collected under the later
program may continue to be expended. The Committee amendment
clarifies that no revenues from either fee program may be
transferred to the schools.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 1 provides a table of contents.
TITLE I--YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK AUTHORIZED PAYMENTS
Section 101(a) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to
provide funds to the two named school districts for fiscal
years 2006 through 2009 for educational services to dependents
of park and concession employees. The Secretary's authority to
make payments to the schools terminates if the State of
California or local education agencies fail to provide funding
to the schools that is no less than the amount provided in FY
2005.
Subsection (b) allows payments only for educational
services that may be funded under this title and prohibits the
funds from being used for construction, construction contracts
or major improvements.
Subsection (c) limits payments to the school district to
the lesser of $400,000 in any fiscal year or the amount
necessary to provide the educational services that are normally
available to students in the State of California.
Subsection (d) allows the Secretary to use funds available
to the National Park Service from appropriations, donations or
fees, except that fee revenues collected under the Land and
Water Conservation Fund Act, the Federal Lands Recreation
Enhancement Act, the Recreation Fee Demonstration Program or
any other law authorizing the collection or expenditure of
entrance or use fees at units of the National Park System may
not be used.
Section 102 provides the authority for the Secretary to
locate park facilities outside of Yosemite National Park to
support a transportation system.
TITLE II--RANCHO CORRAL DE TIERRA GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION
ADJUSTMENT ACT
Section 201 entitles this title the ``Rancho Corral de
Tierra Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment
Act.''
Section 202 amends section 2(a) of Public Law 92-589 to
include several parcels of land comprising approximately 4,500
acres known as the ``Rancho Corral de Tierra Additions'' to be
included within the park boundary. This section also states
that the Secretary may only acquire the described parcels of
land from a willing seller.
Cost and Budgetary Considerations
The following estimate of the costs of this measure has
been provided by the Congressional Budget Office:
S. 136--A bill to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide
supplemental funding and other services that are necessary to
assist certain local school districts in the state of
California in providing educational services for students
attending schools located within Yosemite National Park, to
authorize the Secretary of the Interior to adjust the
boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and for
other purposes
Summary: S. 136 would modify the boundary of the Golden
Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) in California. The bill
also would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make
payments to two California school districts that serve families
of Yosemite National Park employees.
CBO estimates that implementing S. 136 would cost $24
million over the 2006-2010 period, assuming appropriation of
the necessary amounts. The legislation could increase direct
spending, but we estimate that any such effects would be
insignificant. Enacting the bill would not affect revenues. S.
136 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as
defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would
impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments.
Enacting this legislation would benefit two California school
districts.
Estimated cost to the Federal Government: For this
estimate, CBO assumes that S. 136 will be enacted by the start
of fiscal year 2006 and that amounts necessary to implement the
legislation will be appropriated for each fiscal year as
needed. The estimated budgetary impact of S. 136 is shown in
the following table. The costs of this legislation fall within
budget function 300 (natural resources and environment).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--
-----------------------------------------------------
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION
Estimated Authorization Level............................. 0 16 2 2 2 2
Estimated Outlays......................................... 0 16 2 2 2 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basis of Estimate
GGNRA additions
Title II of S. 136 would expand the boundary of the GGNRA
to include the 4,076-acre Rancho Corral de Tierra and over 300
acres of property in the Devil's Slide area. Based on
information provided by the National Park Service (NPS), CBO
estimates that the agency would spend $15 million in 2006 to
purchase the Rancho Corral de Tierra from the Peninsula Open
Space Trust, a local nonprofit organization, which acquired the
property in 2001 for $29.7 million. (We expect that the
organization would recover the balance of the land's purchase
price from private and state sources.)
The cost of acquiring land within the Devil's Slide area is
less certain because formal property appraisals have not yet
been completed and because it is unclear how much of this
acreage might be acquired by the state of California for a
proposed highway diversion. Based on information provided by
the NPS, CBO estimates that the agency would purchase about 300
acres of land within the Devil's Slide area for a total cost of
$5 million over the 2006-2010 period.
Finally, CBO estimates that the cost to develop property
added to the GGNRA would total about $500,000 in 2007. We also
estimate that annual costs to administer the new lands would be
roughly $300,000 starting in 2006.
Yosemite school payments
For each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010, title I of S.
136 would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to pay a
total of up to $400,000 to two California school districts that
serve the families of Yosemite National Park employees. To make
those payments, the bill would authorize the Secretary to use
appropriated funds, donations, or offsetting receipts from
certain fees collected by the NPS. Because CBO expects that
there will be little or no receipts or donations available to
the NPS for new uses, we estimate that implementing the bill
would result in new discretionary spending of $400,000 a year
through 2009, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts.
If any receipts or donations are deemed to be available for the
payments, discretionary spending for this purpose would be
less. Mandatory expenses would increase, but we estimate that
any new mandatory spending would be insignificant.
Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: S. 136
contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as
defined in UMRA and would impose no costs on state, local, or
tribal governments. Enacting this legislation would benefit two
California school districts.
Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Megan Carroll and
Deborah Reis Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments:
Marjorie Miller; and Impact on the Private Sector: Selena
Caldera.
Estimate approved by: Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant
Director for Budget Analysis.
Regulatory Impact Evaluation
In compliance with paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the
Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee makes the following
evaluation of the regulatory impact which would be incurred in
carrying out S. 136.
The bill is not a regulatory measure in the sense of
imposing Government-established standards or significant
economic responsibilities on private individuals and
businesses. No personal information would be collected in
administering the program. Therefore, there would be no impact
on personal privacy.
Little, if any, additional paperwork would result from the
enactment of S. 136.
Executive Communications
On February 16, 2005, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources requested legislative reports from the Department of
the Interior and the Office of Management and Budget setting
forth Executive agency recommendations on Title II of S. 136.
These reports had not been received when this report was filed.
During the 108th Congress, the Committee considered legislation
similar to Title I (H.R. 620). The views of the Administration
on Title I were included in testimony received by the Committee
at a hearing on H.R. 620 on September 9, 2003, as follows:
Statement of Richard Ring, Associate Director for Administration,
Business Practices, and Workforce, Development, National Park Service,
Department of the Interior
Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to present the
views of the Department of the Interior on H.R. 620, which
would authorize assistance to the State of California or local
educational agencies for educational services for students
attending schools in Yosemite National Park and would authorize
park facilities to be established outside the boundary of the
park. This legislation was passed by the House on March 25,
2003.
The Department supports H.R. 620, as we believe that
students who attend schools in Yosemite National Park should
have access to educational services that are comparable to
those that students elsewhere in California receive. The
funding authorized by this bill would be a strictly limited
provision of assistance to address a particularly severe
situation for schools located in a national park. The
Department also supports authorizing expenditures for
facilities outside Yosemite, as this would enable the National
Park Service to contribute to the regional transportation
system being developed to serve Yosemite's visitors and
employees.
Schools have been located within Yosemite National Park for
over 125 years to serve the needs of park employees and their
children. At present, two elementary schools are located within
the park, at Wawona and in Yosemite Valley. A third elementary
school and a small high school are located in El Portal, the
park's administrative site located on federal property just
outside the park boundary. Most high-school age students attend
the larger county high school in Mariposa because of the lack
of opportunity for a comprehensive program at the El Portal
school.
The Yosemite Valley School has 42 students in grades
kindergarten through eighth grade, divided into three classes.
The amount of funding from the State of California, according
to a formula based on average daily attendance, supports only
two teachers.
The school principal also serves as a teacher.
The elementary school in El Portal has 53 students in seven
grades, divided into multigraded classrooms. The Wawona school
mirrors the old ``one-room'' schoolhouse, with 16 children in
grades K-8, and one teacher. Because the current funding
formula provides for only one teacher, the school is unable to
serve more than 20 students. Consequently, in years when the
maximum teacher-student ratio is reached, parents are left with
the choice of either home-schooling their children or
transporting them on their own to schools elsewhere.
Because the schools in the park are located in remote
areas, students at the Yosemite schools lack services that are
normally available to students that attend schools elsewhere in
the state. For example, access to teachers to serve students
with special needs is very limited, and road and weather
conditions can often restrict teachers' abilities to reach the
park. Many facilities are in need of repair or do not meet
state or federal standards.
The quality of education that students receive in these
schools suffers as a result of lack of funding and staffing.
For example, because teachers in the Yosemite schools are
responsible for multiple grade levels, they are at a
disadvantage compared to teachers who are able to focus on the
curriculum and standards for one grade. In addition to their
educational duties, teachers must also tend to administrative
duties normally performed by other employees. As a result, they
are unable to give the time or attention necessary to provide
the quality of education that the students deserve.
Recruitment and retention of employees at Yosemite National
Park is also adversely affected by the quality of the park
schools. Many highly qualified National Park Service employees
with school-age children who might otherwise be interested in
applying for jobs at Yosemite are discouraged from doing so
because of the school situation. Park employees often cite the
schools as a major factor in their decision to transfer from
Yosemite to other assignments.
H.R. 620 authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to
provide funds to the two school districts that administer
schools at Yosemite for educational services to students who
are dependents of park employees or who live on federal
property in or near the park. The bill prohibits funds from
being used for facility construction or major improvements, and
limits the amount of funding that may be provided to the lesser
of $400,000 annually or the amount necessary to provide
students with educational services comparable to those received
by other public school students in California. The bill allows
funding for this purpose to be derived from appropriations,
donations and fees, except that it prohibits the use of fees
collected under the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, from
the Recreational Fee Demonstration program, and from the
National Park Passport program. Thelegislation also prohibits
the use of emergency appropriations for Yosemite flood recovery for
this purpose.
We want to note that the proposal to assist Yosemite
schools has been refined considerably since it was first
introduced last Congress. The initial proposal was an
indefinite authorization of funding with no limit on the dollar
amount that could be spent or restriction on the use of the
funds. During the last Congress, the Department worked closely
with this committee, the House Resources Committee, and the
House and Senate Appropriations Committees to set limits on the
amount, duration, use, and source of the funding authorized by
this legislation. The result is that the proposal in its
current form is now a tightly drawn authorization of a limited
amount of federal assistance for what is a unique educational
situation.
We strongly believe that any assistance for schools
authorized by this bill should be supplemental to Yosemite's
annual budget and should not result in a reduction of the
amount of funding available for park operations and
maintenance.
H.R. 620 also authorizes the Secretary to provide
assistance for transportation systems and facilities outside
the boundary of Yosemite National Park. It does so by extending
to Yosemite the same authority Congress provided Zion National
Park in 1996 to enter into agreements and expend funds outside
the boundaries of the park. This bill explicitly allows
appropriations to be used for `transportation systems' along
with other administrative and visitor use facilities.
This provision would allow the park to contribute
financially to the regional transportation system that serves
the park's visitors and employees. Developing this system has
been a goal of the park since the adoption of the 1980 General
Management Plan.
In 1999 Mariposa, Merced, and Mono counties created a Joint
Powers Authority as an entity to implement the Yosemite Area
Regional Transportation System (YARTS) and entered into a
Cooperative Agreement with Yosemite National Park. Now in its
fourth successful year, YARTS provides an attractive
alternative for visitors and employees without having to
replace the use of private cars. In 2001, YARTS carried over
38,000 passengers, including park employees, during Yosemite's
prime visitor season (May through September). Many of these
visitors chose to leave their cars at their motels or other
locations outside the park. By choosing YARTS to access the
Yosemite Valley, over 11,000 parking places were made available
during the summer.
During the initial two years, the National Park Service
participated in the funding of this project using fee
demonstration program authority. In its third year of
operations, that funding was no longer available, and YARTS had
to reduce the number of runs it provides. The regional
transportation system is an important means to solve Yosemite's
parking and congestion issues by reducing the amount of
infrastructure development within the park, and thus
substantially reducing the funding requirements for
implementing the Yosemite Valley Plan. The Department believes
that a small amount of federal assistance will help make YARTS
an even bigger success.
In addition, the authority provided by H.R. 620 would
enable the National Park Service to establish visitor contact
facilities in the park's gateway communities, as is called for
in the Yosemite Valley Plan.
In order to assure that the park has the ability to
contribute to YARTS through all available transportation
authorities, we suggest amendment H.R. 620 to make the
transportation fee authority provided under Title V of the
National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-391)
applicable to parks that fund transportation services through a
cooperative agreement. The existing language allows parks to
use that authority only in cases where transportation services
are provided through a service contract. The text of this
proposed amendment is attached.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my remarks. I would be happy
to respond to any questions that you or the other members of
the subcommittee may have.
Changes in Existing Law
In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the
Standing Rules of the Senate, changes in existing law made by
S. 136, as ordered reported, are shown as follows (existing law
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new
matter is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is
proposed is shown in roman):
PUBLIC LAW 92-589
AN ACT To establish the Golden Gate National Recreation Area in the
State of California, and for other purposes
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
* * * * * * *
COMPOSITION AND BOUNDARIES
Sec. 2. (a) [The recreation area shall comprise] (1)
Initial lands.--The recreation area shall compromise the lands,
waters, and submerged lands generally depicted on the map
entitled: `Revised Boundary Map, Golden Gate National
Recreation Area', numbered NRA-GG-80,003-K and dated October
1978, plus those areas depicted on the map entitled `Point
Reyes and GGNRA Amendments and dated October 25, 1979'. The
authority of the Secretary to acquire lands in the tract known
as San Francisco Assessor's Block number 1592 shall be limited
to an area of not more than one and nine-tenths acres.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the
Secretary shall not acquire the Marin County Assessor's parcels
numbered 199-181-01, 199-181-06, 199-181-08, 199-181-13, and
199-181-14, located in the Muir Beach portion of the recreation
area. For the purposes of this subchapter, the southern end of
the town of Marshall shall be considered to be the Marshall
Boat Works. [The following additional lands are also hereby
included within the boundaries of the recreation area: Marin
County Assessor's parcel numbered 119-040-04, 119-040-05, 119-
040-18, 166-202-03, 166-010-06, 166-010-07, 166-010-24, 166-
010-25, 119-240-19, 166-010-10, 166-010-22, 119-240-03, 119-
240-51, 119-240-52, 119-240-54, 166-101-12, 166-010-13, and
119-235-10. The recreation area shall also include the lands
and waters in San Mateo County generally depicted on the map
entitled `Sweeney Ridge Addition, Golden Gate National
Recreation Area', numbered NRA GG-80,OOO-A, and dated May 1980.
The recreation area shall also include those lands acquired
pursuant to the Golden Gate National Recreational Area Addition
Act of 1992. The recreation area shall also include the lands
generally depicted on the map entitled `Additions to Golden
Gate National Recreation Area', numbered NPS-80,076, and dated
July 2000/PWR-PLRPC.]
(2) Additional lands.--In addition to the lands
described in paragraph (1), the recreation area shall
include the following:
(A) The parcels numbered by the Assessor of
Marin County, California, 119-040-04, 119-040-
05, 119-040-18, 166-202-03, 166-010-06, 166-
010-07, 166-010-24, 166-010-25 119-240-19, 166-
010-10, 166-010-22, 119-240-03, 119-240-51,
119-240-52, 119-240-54, 166-010-12, 166-010-13,
and 119-235-10.
(B) Lands and waters in San Mateo County
generally depicted on the map entitled `Sweeney
Ridge Addition, Golden Gate National Recreation
Area', numbered NRA GG-80,000-A, and dated May
1980.
(C) Lands acquired under the Golden Gate
National Recreation Area Addition Act of 1992
(16 U.S.C. 460bb-1 note; Public Law 102-299).
(D) Lands generally depicted on the map
entitled `Additions to Golden Gate National
Recreation Area', numbered NPS-80-076, and
dated July 2000/PWR-PLRPC.
(E) Lands generally depicted on the map
entitled `Rancho Corral de Tierra Additions to
the Golden Gate National Recreation Area',
numbered NPS-80,079E, and dated March 2004.
(3) Acquisition limitation.--The Secretary may
acquire land described in paragraph (2)(E) only from a
willing seller.
* * * * * * *