[House Report 108-88]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



108th Congress                                                   Report
 1st Session          HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                   108-88
======================================================================
 
     USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR THE D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 
                         ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

                                _______
                                

 May 1, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Young of Alaska, from the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                    [To accompany H. Con. Res. 128]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

    The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom 
was referred the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 128) 
authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the D.C. Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run, having considered the same, 
report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that 
the concurrent resolution be agreed to.

                       PURPOSE OF THE LEGISLATION

    The purpose of H. Con. Res. 128 is to authorize the use of 
the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

                BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION

    H. Con. Res. 128 was introduced by Mr. LaTourette and Ms. 
Norton. The resolution authorizes use of the Capitol Grounds 
for the 18th Annual Law Enforcement Torch Run, benefiting the 
District of Columbia Special Olympics. The Capitol Police, 
along with the D.C. Special Olympics, will participate in the 
torch run to be held on June 6, 2003. The D.C. Special Olympics 
will work closely with the Capitol Police and the Architect of 
the Capitol to see that the event is in full compliance with 
the rules and regulations governing the use of the Capitol 
Grounds.

            LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

    No hearings were held in conjunction with ordering reported 
H. Con. Res. 128.
    On April 9, 2003, the Full Committee met in open session 
and ordered reported H. Con. Res. 128, a resolution authorizing 
the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. The resolution was 
discharged from the Subcommittee on Economic Development, 
Public Buildings and Emergency Management and a motion by Mr. 
LaTourette to order H. Con. Res. 128 favorably reported to the 
House was agreed to by the Full Committee unanimously, by voice 
vote with a quorum present. There were no recorded votes taken 
during Committee consideration of H. Con. Res. 128.

                       SUMMARY OF THE LEGISLATION

Section 1. Authorization

    This section authorizes the use of the Capitol Grounds for 
the District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch 
Run on June 6, 2003 or such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Senate Rules and 
Administration Committee may jointly designate.

Section 2. Responsibility of Capitol Police Board

    This section requires the Capitol Police Board to take such 
actions as may be necessary to carry out the event.

Section 3. Conditions relating to physical preparation

    This section allows the Architect of the Capitol to 
prescribe conditions for the physical preparations for the 
event.

Section 4. Enforcement of restrictions

    This section requires the Capitol Police Board to enforce 
all applicable restrictions on the use of the Capitol Grounds, 
including those relating to sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations.

                             ROLLCALL VOTES

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives 
requires each committee report to include the total number of 
votes cast for and against on each rollcall vote on a motion to 
report and on any amendment offered to the measure or matter, 
and the names of those members voting for and against. There 
were no recorded votes taken in connection with ordering H. 
Con. Res. 128 reported.

                      COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(1) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee's oversight findings and recommendations are 
reflected in this report.

                          COST OF LEGISLATION

    Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives does not apply where a cost estimate and 
comparison prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 has been timely submitted prior to the filing of the 
report and is included in the report. Such a cost estimate is 
included in this report.

                    COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XIII

    1. With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(2) of 
rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, and 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee 
references the report of the Congressional Budget Office 
included below.
    2. With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(4) of 
rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee advises that the resolution contains no measure that 
authorizes funding, so no statement of general performance and 
objectives for which any measure authorizes funding is 
required.
    3. With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(3) of 
rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and 
section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the 
Committee has received the following cost estimate for H. Con. 
Res. 128 from the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.

                                     U.S. Congress,
                               Congressional Budget Office,
                                    Washington, DC, April 10, 2003.
Hon. Don Young,
Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office, has 
prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H. Con. Res. 128, a 
concurrent resolution authorizing the use of the Capitol 
grounds for the District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
Enforcement Torch Run.
    If you wish further details on these estimates, we will be 
pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Matthew 
Pickford.
            Sincerely,
                                          Barry B. Anderson
                               (For Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director).
    Enclosure.

H. Con. Res. 128--Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the 
        District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run

    H. Con. Res. 128 would authorize the District of Columbia 
Special Olympic Law Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the 
Capitol grounds on June 6, 2003, or on such other date as the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Senate 
Committee on Rules and Administration may jointly designate. 
CBO estimates that passage of H. Con. Res. 128 would result in 
no significant cost to the federal government.
    The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Matthew 
Pickford. The estimate was approved by Peter H. Fontaine, 
Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.

                   CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

    Pursuant to clause (3)(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, committee reports on a bill or 
joint resolution of a public character shall include a 
statement citing the specific powers granted to the Congress in 
the Constitution to enact the measure. The Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure finds that Congress has the 
authority to enact this measure pursuant to its powers granted 
under article I, section 8 of the Constitution.

                       FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

    The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of Federal 
mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act. (Public Law 104-4).

                        PREEMPTION CLARIFICATION

    Section 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
requires the report of any Committee on a bill or joint 
resolution to include a statement on the extent to which the 
bill or joint resolution is intended to preempt state, local or 
tribal law. The Committee states that H. Con. Res. 128 does not 
preempt any state, local or tribal law.

                      ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this 
legislation.

                APPLICABILITY TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act. (Public Law 
104-1).

         CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

    H. Con. Res. 128 makes no changes to existing law.

                                
